DEBATE BLOODSPORTS

Step with the 10.

Sleeper Cell with the 10.

Vortex with the 10.

Stalin Barrier Gulag with the 25.

Tail, Johnny, Real Stranger.

What's up, guys?

How is everybody doing?

We are going to get right into the

Confront the chairman space.

And I'm gonna start the space.

Though I believe I have something of great importance to talk to you guys about.

But you want to know what's great?

I can talk to you about it in the space itself.

So let's get the space going.

I'm going to start it.

And you guys should spread it around.

Let's and I need a co-host as well.

Okay, huh.

I'm starting the space.

Okay.

Amila with the 10.

What's going on, Amila?

I appreciate you so much.

Appreciate you so much.

So, guys, I have the space going.

I'm going to copy the link.

Uh I think it automatically forces me to tweet the space.

So, what I'll have you guys do is just boost this tweet.

I'll just have you guys boost my tweet.

Give me one sec.

All right.

You guys should be boosting my tweet.

Alright, there you go.

There you go.

So, I want to start off talking about why I prohibit discourse in the Discord.

And I advised last night the prohibition of discourse in general about the events in DC where apparently some guy from the PSL or they're claiming he's not PSL.

I don't know.

ABC, what's up?

He shot and killed two embassy entity embassy staffers or something.

So here's why.

So it just was breaking news last night.

And I made the decision because.

I didn't want any reckless discourse.

I didn't want a discourse to start because the nature of discourse is that it's going to generate a lot of different perspectives and a lot of different takes.

And all it takes is one reckless take to fucking put us in danger.

Okay.

So that's why I, for the security of our community, I shut it down.

That's why.

Okay.

Because I know most of you have common sense, but there are two to five percent of you who are mentally retarded and who don't think.

And so you'll type away saying some nonsense, not think, and you won't think about it, you know?

And this is what I had to shut.

So, because of that, 5%, 95% has to be censored.

Okay.

So, that's really why I had to shut it down, you know.

Um

You gotta be careful and exercise security.

You don't get to say whatever you want, believe it or not, you don't.

There's some stupid people that, you know, they have this idea that they LARP as revolutionaries.

And the first thing they do is they'll be like, hello, FBI.

You know what a really revolution?

I'm a huge revolutionary, by the way.

I don't believe in the law.

I don't believe in laws.

I believe in violence.

You hear me?

Everyone, hear me.

Everyone, listen to me.

I'm so smart and radical.

Everyone, everyone.

These people are retards, you know?

And I spit in their face because they're just fucking stupid.

They're just like, I the it's just like how fucking stupid can you be?

You're a fucking idiot, you know.

Like, what do you think?

You think we live in the George Soros open society where you could just say whatever the fuck you want?

Are you stupid?

It's like so stupid, you know?

It's really fucking stupid, you know.

I don't know.

These people are not radicals, they're feds because.

I straight up don't think it's the way forward, to be clear.

I don't think it's the way forward.

You know, I don't think that voluntarism and terrorism and violence is the way forward.

I straight up don't.

Okay?

Like, I'm not just saying that because you're not allowed to endorse that view.

I'm I'm saying it because I genuinely.

Look, you just have to read Lenin on adventurism and terrorism.

I'm not even using terrorism as the spooky word that it's acquired in recent decades.

I'm talking about the word as it was used in the early 20th century, okay, by the Bolsheviks, by Marxists.

It is fundamentally individualistic.

And in a principled way, I don't have to say this, but I am saying it.

I reject it.

It is the antithesis of discipline and collective organization.

Now, if we eventually, see, some people are stupid.

They go, so what are you, a pacifist?

It's like revolutionary situations are not drawn out of a hat.

You don't just create a revolutionary situation because you feel like it.

It's an objective phenomenon.

Revolutions are objective phenomena.

It all depends upon the masses, and it depends upon material conditions that are not in your control.

It doesn't matter what you believe in your head.

That's not what determines a revolutionary situation.

So whoever is pushing violence right now is a Fed and an agent provocateur.

Because all they're doing is encouraging people to go to jail.

And what good is that?

You're not going to take down the state.

You're not going to take down the army.

You're not going to take down the military.

You're going to fucking go to jail.

And that's all that's going to happen.

It's not going to inspire and rouse the masses into action either.

They tried it in the 70s.

It doesn't work.

It's not going to happen.

Put the fucking fries in the bag and shut the fuck up.

It's not going to happen.

Um

So, okay, so I want to be clear.

Like, first of all, even, I mean, like, you.

Anyone who end this is why I'm saying these people are feds.

Anyone who endorses this course of action and talks about it publicly is a fucking Fed.

If they're on a Fed, they're a child, okay?

Because if you were serious about that, you probably would just not even be on social media.

You'd probably just be doing it.

Not that I endorse it, I don't.

But that's what you'd be doing.

You just you'd go and do it, you know?

Um.

But you're talking about it in public, which tells me that you're an agent provocateur and you're a Fed.

Case closed.

It's the end.

You know?

That's it.

It's really that simple.

Anyways, anyone want a co-host?

I'll give you the co-host.

So uh okay, so I I just want to be clear about that.

And I don't have to if I look if I wanted to if I wanted there to be ambiguity I could just keep my mouth shut and not say anything if I was like trying to be ambiguous about what what my feelings on this just because I'm afraid of the law but I am saying openly and directly that this is fucking stupid and useless and it accomplishes literally nothing and I don't have to say that no one's making me say that I'm freely and voluntarily saying

That adventurism

And wanton acts of criminal violence do not advance the movement, they don't advance the cause, they do the exact opposite.

And that's just an objective fact.

And if you don't understand this,

Um

I don't even know what to tell you.

You just are so fundamentally far gone.

I don't even know how I could have a conversation with you.

Um, so look, I I want to be clear about that, you know?

Uh oh, ABC, you can co-host, perfect.

I'll give you the co-host.

So, guys, I want to talk, but I want to add to this because I'm not done talking about it yet, right?

And this is, I don't want you guys saying this in Discord, and I don't want you saying it in general, but let me tell it to you right here.

Don't repeat my words, let me just tell it to you live.

I

Think that the loss of human life is tragic, and I think life is sacred, and I genuinely do.

But you know what?

I don't give a single fuck about what happens to the government employees of the Zionist entity.

I literally don't give a shit.

Ask me if I care.

I don't give a fuck.

I literally don't give a shit.

It's not my fucking problem.

I don't give a fuck.

If 68 people die every day in the United States and I never hear about them and therefore just can't care about them because I don't know who they are.

Why should I give a fuck about the government employees of a Nazi genocidal state and shed tears for them?

I don't have to condemn anything.

Just like I'm not condemning all these other random, because I'm not responsible for it.

It has nothing to do with me.

I'm just what I want to communicate very loud and clear is that you should not be doing this.

You should not be encouraging it.

And you should not be like rallying behind this 'cause it's fucking stupid.

But to dispel any ambiguity in, you know, my attitude toward this is.

Well, look, if this happened to the government employees of the Third Reich, that's how I see it.

That's straight up the same way.

And I don't have sadism.

I'm not gloating and laughing at anyone dying.

But.

Justice means that we don't start feigning moral outrage over these government employees getting killed in acts of violence until consistently and across the board everyone understands the gravity of the crit and the scale of the criminal genocidal acts of the Zionist entity in Gaza.

And currently that's not the case.

Tens of thousands of innocent civilians are being slaughtered and killed and massacred.

And nobody gives a shit.

And you expect me for even one second to start shedding tears about this?

I mean, no, I'm not.

If you don't care about a genocide, don't expect people to give a fuck about this.

And that's just a testament to the fact that, of course, we're against violence.

It's all around violence is evil.

We're fighting for a world without violence, you know?

But.

To start shedding tears over these two government employees, I feel like is to say that

The life of Gazans is cheap because they literally target government employees in Gaza and they call them terrorists.

All these children, all these babies getting killed and murdered, uh uh you're cheapening the value of their life when you start discursively feigning outrage over shit like this.

Life is precious and life is sacred.

I genuinely am not happy about anyone dying.

Um by the way, you should have the same attitude as me.

No one should be sadistic and be happy about anyone dying.

But we have no moral duty to condemn this.

As though we're responsible for it, 'cause we're not.

We have nothing to do with it.

We have no moral duty either to start

Feigning outrage and says oh, what a horrible yeah, what a what a horrible thing across the board.

What a horrible thing that's been happening to Gaza.

You know?

And what a horrible thing that's happening to the sixty eight people murdered every day in the USA.

Every day in the USA sixty eight people are murdered.

We have a general problem of gun violence, we have a general problem of crime.

I am not wi I'm not going to start categorizing this as different.

So that's what I have to say, you know.

This is the same thing to me, and I'm not saying I don't care.

It's tragic, it's horrible, but it's like if you heard on the news there was some some gun violence in Chicago with gangs or in Detroit.

It's terrible, but is this changing everything?

No, it's not going to change everything.

You know, there's a genocide in Gaza.

How is this going to change everything?

You know?

So these are my unfiltered thoughts and feelings on the matter, and it's that simple.

I think it was an idiotic act.

Simultaneously, I don't care.

Um like I don't give a fuck.

Uh like I don't care.

I would never would tolerate my community entertaining this.

This is not my problem, it's that simple.

And I want to say a final thing before I move on.

Final thing on this matter, right?

Um ha ha ha ha.

This is not anti-Semitic violence.

That's another thing I want to say.

I see all these lib-tarded politicians like AOC.

And, um, pf who is that new fucking guy who all the DSA people are rallying behind now?

What's his name?

The new guy, um, what's his name?

The new mayor?

Yeah.

Um

Zo Zohron.

Zohron.

Yeah, what what is anti-Semitic about this?

I don't I don't even get that.

What's where's the anti-Semitism?

Uh that's just fucking nonsense, you know?

Uh yeah, so it's another stupid thing people are saying.

If you say if you call this anti-Semitic, you're a Zionist.

Because it was clearly motivated by the conflict involving the Zionist entity.

And if you're equating that with Judaism in general

Then guess what, you're a Zionist.

So Zohron and Aoc are Zionists.

That simple.

Okay, so that's my unfiltered thoughts.

Now we only have one person requesting, and it's Rambly.

We'll give them 15 seconds.

Go ahead, Rambly.

15 seconds.

15.

This is one of the people that were groomed into the anti-ACP cult and they're being sent here to embarrass themselves in public.

Go ahead, Rambly, unmute yourself.

Okay, as a member of PSL, I feel the need to ask you this question: How many rules do women have below the belt?

Yeah.

As a member of PSL the first thing you ask is about women's genitals and that's

That tracks, I guess, you know.

I hear they have a problem with sex pests in their organization.

So it tracks, that would be the thing you ask.

So you had that was 15 seconds.

You had your chance.

AB.

And by the way, guys, I want to say another thing.

Don't, you know, let's not.

I I want to tell you guys what's going to happen.

If there's any crackdowns on PSL.

We're gonna defend PSL.

And if there's a crackdown on Hassan Piker legally, we'll defend Hassan Piker.

And why?

Because we're principled.

Not because we like them personally, we don't, but we're actually principled.

That's why.

Because we're actually principled, literally, that's why.

If PSL starts getting persecuted over this which is not fair, because PSL didn't give the uh orders to do this, they didn't tell him to you see how fu am I a sucker for how un for how principled I am?

Like

If this was one of if this was somebody who was like even one degree of separation related to us, they would just be screaming on the top of their lungs, arrest ACP, they're criminals, whatever.

But look at how principled we are defending the truth, right?

I guess that's the price of being principled.

So ABC will bring on ABC or ABS not ABC.

Go ahead, ABS.

Can you hear me all right?

Yeah.

Hey Haas, I have a question about the ACP and what it feels what was the ACP doing differently that made the CPUSA ultimately fail in its mission?

I don't know the whole history of the CPUSA, but are there things are there mistakes that were learned from and the ACP has done like structurally or internally to not repeat those mistakes?

I would sum that up by saying there's a lot of things, but I would sum it up and simplify it by saying that we make work the default, not the exception.

So a heightened state of activity is just something we just have learned, I think, to keep going constantly.

Even if it's not being, I mean, it's just, that's the norm.

It's just a heightened state of activity.

I mean, that alone separates us from them.

I mean, the CPUSA back before it was reconstituted, they were dead.

All these clubs were dead.

The membership was dead.

They were passive members and there was nothing really going on.

I would not be surprised if we have more active members than CPUSA right now.

I'm not going to lie.

It wouldn't surprise me.

They really don't have a lot.

Well, was there, there was a time when CPUSA was more active and a lot more popular.

This is like maybe during the Great Depression.

Yeah, in the 30s.

I mean, they were unable to, it seems like they were unable to somehow benefit from even the Great Depression.

I guess FDR was too popular in the minds, the imaginations of Americans.

There was a big struggle in the CPUSA, and it was all about Foster versus these Trotskyite factions that were gatekeeping.

And Foster was a very hands-on, experienced, organic, working-class, organic intellectual who had experience on the ground, you know, organizing labor unions and being involved in the radical movement with farmers and so on and so on.

And Foster was definitely, I think, on track to really bring that party to glory, making it more populist and so on.

But they kind of just shut it down.

They shut down.

Foster introduced a lot of uniquely American things that they shut down.

And that was due to the preponderance of social dem democratic and Trotskyite influences.

Aztec, what's up going on?

So

That's my interpretation, at least.

I think that there was a lot of heterodox.

ideas Foster pioneered that we're not really able to

get taken off the ground, but um

And they were an independent party.

They were not liquidated as the current CPUSA is.

They were not wedded to the Democratic Party.

That was a significant difference.

Okay, that's all I have.

For sure.

See you later, man.

So

Do we have any other requests?

It's just Rambly again.

I guess it's si he's the only one requesting.

We'll bring him for twelve seconds.

Go ahead, Rambly.

You have twelve seconds.

Or he disconnected.

What a shame.

Twelve seconds, Rambley.

Twelve, eleven, ten.

Okay.

Well, he's gone.

Oh he's back.

Twelve, eleven.

Answer the question.

Answer just answer the question for me.

Come on, has how many holes?

Three.

How many holes?

One, zero.

Thank you, Rambly.

Appreciate your women's genitals questions on a weekly basis.

They really do a lot to enrich the seriousness of your cult.

Rambly, by the way, he's a self admitted, like, autistic, um guy who's been groomed into this cult because they're taking advantage of his mental his neurodivergent tendencies and to manipulate him.

I find it sad.

Uh, he's n I don't think he's PSL.

I think he's just he just said that.

Uh have you already addressed why doesn't the ACP program mention class?

Umph.

Okay, let's pull up our program.

Let's just pull it up, right?

Let's just do that.

Some

The first thing

Cancellation of debts, abolition of the Federal Reserve, economic bill of rights, land, housing reform, national industrial policy.

So we have all of these kind of policies.

Which are giving context

to the political form of the class struggle.

This is

It's like

It's such a baffling question because I d it's almost asking like why doesn't

Why wasn't Stalin literally?

In the bullet casings of the guns that were fired at the Nazis.

It's like,

This is how you create the ground that defines the context of political class struggle.

This program.

very clearly, if it was ever to gain traction, polarizes the country on class lines, because it's only in the interests of the working class, right?

Um we are already a party of the working class, we're already involved in the labor movement.

The uh we are a Marxist Leninist party.

I mean, the the people focus too much on form and not content.

This is the content of the demands of a proletarian party.

Just because it is not formally announcing

Uh you know, how much it identifies as proletarian.

I mean, that it's it's form versus content, I guess, you know.

Um

Yeah, why doesn't it mention Marks?

Why doesn't our program mention uh

It's just kinda fucking stupid, you know.

What what can you say?

This is what we have to offer to the country and to the people of this country, and it's going to polarize this country if it gains traction on class lines.

It's pretty clear, okay this is a working class program.

A working class program does not need to call itself a working class program.

It's there in the content.

It's in the constitution.

Because people don't know what a program is.

Yes, it's there in the constitution, obviously.

We are a party of the working class.

The const the the program

'Kay.

Uh um I have to I want to be patient.

I'm a patient educator.

Marxists are not advocating class struggle in their program because class struggle is an objective reality.

We're not telling the American people, we would like to create class conflicts as if they don't already exist.

No, that already exists.

We are already a society characterized by class antagonism.

The Constitution is where you're supposed to take a side.

We're constituting ourselves as a party of the working class in this class conflict.

The program is a political program.

Is not going to make me make mention.

of uh the very context within which it has meaningfulness.

Because it is the pro already the program of the American Communist Party.

Like, it's not a random program that creates that's already the context, you know, I don't understand.

I don't understand the silliness sometimes.

People don't understand how parties work or anything.

Uh is anyone else requesting ABC?

Uh we've got one from uh CryptQ Santa.

What I don't know, I didn't hear that, but bring them on.

Girl, I'll let him in.

There's a guy named Maga, we'll bring him on as well.

Okay, qu um Santa, go ahead.

Uh, Jew, truth teller, good over evil, truth over propaganda.

I don't know what go ahead, Santa, what is this?

Do you uh do you really want to talk?

Yeah, I mean you've been brought up.

Maybe MAGA has something to say.

Okay.

MAGA, go ahead.

Yeah, hey, uh go USA.

I think you guys are great.

Um I just want to say this.

Um my God.

Are you are you guys communist Americans?

Is that what we're dealing with here?

uh yeah these guys are i'm not it's in the well crypto i'm we got to do one at a time well yeah it's in the name american communist do you what so when you say you're a communist um like again let me let me preface this i'm a poor kid from brooklyn new york that's a multi-millionaire today in america and so now okay i'm a financial advisor who didn't know anything about being a financial advisor when i started and then america through the education system taught me how to be that so now you sell me on how i should share my wealth with people that didn't work like me go ahead you sell me on that as a financial advisor i i i teach people how to i'm a 401k primarily financial advisor so i teach people how to save for retirement as a financial advisor okay so like i'm teaching people can't that all be automated no it can't why not it can't be because you have i'll tell you why because you have to teach people how to okay if you're a 20 year old saving in america you would be in an aggressive growth portfolio meaning primarily stocks whereas if you're a 60 year old why couldn't saving in america think ai could could take those variables and calculate that absolutely not because you have why because you have to age and calculate risk based on age and all this stuff why couldn't it because you have to deal because you have to actually relate with people when you're talking to them about their money that's the first reason why ai i can relate chat gbt can relate to me right now no i no it can't it you might think that because you're you're you're comfortable with computers like i get what you're saying and i'm not trying to make fun of you or like whatever like but you might think that because you're comfortable in that respect in that medium but the truth be told when it comes to people's money it it's very personal so you have to actually they have to be able to say i trust you so much i i i i i i don't want to make it personal i'm keeping it impersonal but the truth be told if we had our way your job would not exist

Okay, how so?

Well, there wouldn't have to be this need for everyone to have to have this completely wild financial situation with this broken financial system.

What's wild about it?

What do you perceive as wild?

I think Singapore has a better model for savings where it's actually government that more or less oversees and manages people's savings accounts and stuff.

I think that's a way for that model.

I might be sold on this.

What's their model?

I don't know their model.

Um, I couldn't get into the details right now, but what they basically do is they can't.

Of course, you can't.

No, I mean, I can't off the top of my head.

But what I do know is different about, okay, well, your job is fake, so I figured that you know, you wouldn't.

I'm fake, but you can't dive into the Singapore model.

You were about to say, no, it's your job.

You should know these things.

This is what you're doing.

No, I don't know.

I don't know this.

I'm an American.

I know the American model.

But your whole life is about.

You just said that you were going to tell me about a Singapore model.

No, I said I couldn't tell you all the details, but very vaguely how they do it is the state basically manages the question of people's savings and so on and so on.

So instead of having to go to middlemen like you, we said so on and so on.

I could speak specifically about what I do.

You told me about a Singapore model you were going to tell me about, and now you can't tell me about it.

You want to know how to do why I'm not going to tell you about it.

Should I be the host?

Because you're a terrible host.

You want to know why I'm not going to tell you about it?

Because you can't?

No, I'll tell you why.

No, that's the truth.

Because you can't.

Do you want to know?

You can kick me now.

Because you've got to do it.

I want you to ask me.

Do you want to know?

Go ahead.

I'm going to give you a chance to redeem yourself because you failed so far.

Fucking chat GBT could do it right now for you.

I know.

You couldn't chat GPT quick enough.

Go ahead and open it.

You couldn't chat GPT quick enough.

Go ahead, open chat GPT.

Go ahead and educate me.

You simply couldn't do this.

I asked you.

I gave you multiple chances.

Go ahead.

I'm drunk and I'm better than you right now.

Nope.

That's how sad.

GPT deep at your job.

It blows you out of the water.

Yeah, I know, but you couldn't tell me about the Singapore model.

You were telling me how it was going to replace my job, though.

You can drop it.

You said AI is going to replace your job.

You're just a middle man.

Oh, you guys are funny.

All right.

So we're real money.

This guy's a fake person.

I'm still talking about MAGA right now.

MAGA, you need to get the story straight.

I know you're just going to be.

Dude, I'll give you 500 bucks to shut up right now.

So your audience is not going to be awesome.

Hey, boys, sit down, bar.

Your job is fake.

You're dummy.

I own your job.

By the way, if we had our way.

If we had our way, sit down, sit down.

If we had our way.

You should make me co-sit down so I can help you.

MAGA, sit down.

If we had our way, your job would not exist.

This could be a good show.

For a number of reasons.

First of all, it wouldn't need to because of AI.

Second of all, it would be centralized by the state, if any.

If there's any centralized by the state.

Now, that's an answer to financial security.

You're a dummy.

You're a real dummy.

That's what Singapore has.

So who's the financial state?

My God.

This guy's pathetic.

You want somebody centralized controlling?

I'll pay you $1,000 to shut up right now.

MAGA, you sound very estrogenic.

You're soying out.

Can you calm down and speak rationally?

You seem very upset.

So, MAGA, this is the thing, right?

You're conflating two different things.

One is that I said your job probably is going to get automated.

The second thing is that if we had our way, it would not even exist in the first place, not just because it's going to be automated, but because there would probably be more of an intervention by the state to oversee.

See, right now in the U.S., the question of financial security for each and every person is treated as a purely individual question.

So in order for people to know how to save and how to spend and so on and so on for their future, all of it, they have to go through middlemen like you.

They have to basically a more responsible system.

I have to mute these estrogenic people who don't know how to control themselves.

In order to have a better system that's more responsible, because at the end of the day, a random person does not know how to save the best way.

It's just the truth.

That's why they have to pay money to consult parasites such as yourself to do it for them.

They're 401k.

So that would just be in the near term, right?

Upon an more immediate seizure of power where there's still a financial system, where money still exists and so on and so on, where people still do have to save and spend wisely and so on.

So that's, I mean, your job is not involved in any physical production, though.

Your job is basically parasitical.

And I'll tell you why it's objectively parasitical.

And I don't want you to get emotional because it's not personal.

But.

Money as it exists right now is just credit printed by the Federal Reserve, backed up by nothing, right?

And it's all debt.

Remember, we're thirty trillion, over thirty trillion in debt, basically.

And it's supposed to be collateralized by real physical goods and real physical production, that's what they say, but it really isn't.

And so it's just one great bubble waiting to burst and collapse at any moment, more or less, right?

And your job is to basically scam people in the short term into thinking that, you know, 30, 20, 30 years from now, whenever, everything's just going to go on as usual as it is now.

And that this is sustainable, that we're going to triple our debt.

We're going to quadruple.

It'll all be fine.

The exponential rate of growth, the runaway debt, it's not going to be an issue.

Runaway inflation won't be an issue.

And the whole stock market, it's all gambling and speculation.

And it's not rooted in anything tangible or substantial, right?

So your whole job is just a scam.

I'm not trying to hate on you for it.

I'm not saying on a personal level you should feel guilty.

Get your bag however you can.

But you came into my space talking about how you feel entitled to scamming the American people and being a parasite on a social level.

You have no such entitlement.

That's all I'm telling you.

Like, yes, if we had our way, your job would not exist.

You'd have to pick up a shovel and get a real job.

So that's my answer to you.

On a personal level, I'm not hating.

Do what you got to do to make money.

But you're asking us and now at the level should should America's policies

Revolve around people like you?

Fuck no, they shouldn't.

They should revolve around people who actually work for a living, like truckers, like people who work in factories, like people who actually do physical labor and don't just sit around LARPing as the wolf of Wall Street.

So that's my answer to you.

Simple as that.

I'll go ahead and unmute you.

Go ahead, MAGO.

Thank you so much.

And Hans, I'm going to tell you, I gave you a follow.

I gave you a follow.

I love to follow idiots like you.

I really do.

Like, you're an idiot.

You're a fucking dummy.

Like, you know nothing about life or making money.

You have a, you're LARPing for people, for 122 people to listen to you that are probably hard on their luck.

And I'm being honest with you, bro.

You probably want the insurance job.

Are you going to make this money?

Are you going to make us money?

A guy like you sounds like a really good guy that I put at the corner to like sell the lowest of the low.

Like you're, you're, you're a liar.

To your own people.

Like, these people are looking for a cause.

Anyone listening to you is looking for a cause.

All right.

But you don't make any sense.

I get it.

Like you're.

I want to say one thing real quick.

I'll give you the floor.

Let's all start getting rich and making money.

Go ahead.

Because you're saying I'm deceiving everyone from learning how to build true wealth, right?

So I'll give you the floor and you could lecture all of us on how we can all make money and improve.

Instead of communism, instead of politics, instead of devoting our life to this noble, selfless cause.

By the way, nobody here has the expectation this is going to get them a good life.

It's called working selflessly for a noble common good.

You wouldn't know that as a financial manager, unfortunately.

You know, look, if it helps your guilty conscience, you can donate to our party.

I'll give you that permission.

If it helps your guilty conscience.

But go ahead and explain to us the good life in the platonic philosophical sense.

What is the good life?

How do we do it?

Go ahead.

The floor is yours.

Thank you so much.

Well, I will say you're gracious.

Like

Yeah.

You're not muted, go ahead, unmute yourself.

Sorry, the double mute got me.

Okay, so if you're in America, all right, I'm gonna start you from high school.

This is how it's gonna work.

Ready?

As a guy, that's worth about $300 million right now, maybe more.

You are?

Okay.

Yeah, I'm easily worth that.

Easily.

Okay, you know what?

Let's start there.

Wait, wait, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, wait, wait.

Wait, you don't have to interrupt.

You have to ask one question.

I was just going to give that MAGA magazine.

You don't have to interrupt me.

I would to prove it, donate $50,000 to our party right now to prove it.

If it's nothing to you, I mean, $300 million.

$50,000 is nothing.

It's like pocket change.

Why would I?

Wait, wait, to the Communist Party?

No, I would not.

I would not do that.

No, it's like going ban for ban.

It's like to flex to basically prove.

No, no, no, no.

I don't have to flex.

Trust me, I will show you.

All right, well, you're lying.

You're new.

It's not worth it.

What do you want to see?

You want to see my check-in account, my brokerage account?

What do you want to see?

It could all be Photoshop.

The only way you could prove it is by sending 50,000.

Okay.

All right.

Maybe to someone else that is a capitalist.

Like, I would.

Maybe I would.

No, it's like not some losers.

You just got called out.

You got to go ban for ban now.

You just got called.

All right.

He can send a show.

I'm going to show you.

I'm going to show you.

I'll label 50k to the communist party to prove you're worth that much.

There's people smiley facing because there are people in your audience that know who I am that know that I'm not lying to you.

So just shut up and listen, you dumb guy.us right now.

Okay.

And show us your wealth.

I would never give to a commie.

I hope you die, you commie pig.

So let me tell the rest of the audience.

Why would I care?

But you're broke, aren't you?

You're a pig.

You're a liar.

You're a bad guy.

I exposed you.

No, let's not go.

You're a 25-year-old with no business experience trying to tell everyone how to live.

You're not worth $300 million.

Wait, no, hold on.

I'll blast you.

It doesn't matter.

I don't know who I am.

You are not worth, sir.

You are not worth $300 million.

All right.

Yes, I am.

Easily worth that.

No, you're not.

Look at the thumbs up in the audience.

You're a dummy.

I don't see you.

I just came in here.

I just get.

Yes, you do.

You see it.

Did you look down long enough?

I don't see it.

I promise you.

I promise you, I'm not lying to you.

I know you're getting real weirded out right now, but there are people in here that know who I am.

I think you're lying.

You're about to get really.

I know you do.

I know.

I know because you're honestly just a little commie prick.

I get it.

What is being?

Like, you're just a little commie prick.

I get it.

Let me tell the audience how to become rich.

Go ahead.

Without you.

Okay.

One last thing.

I'm going to unmute you real quick.

Tell my audience how to become rich, but don't lie to them and tell them you have 300 million because you really don't.

No, I do.

No, you don't.

No, you don't.

You really don't.

That's the thing.

You really don't.

Go ahead, unmute yourself.

Just don't lie.

Okay, let's do this.

How about we do this?

There's a guy in the audience right now.

His name's Look.

This is like a classic scam artist magician.

Oh, there's a guy in the audience who's going to pull the rabbit out of my ass.

It's like, it's totally just a scam.

We don't want to hear it.

This is literally that movie with them magicians.

Was it called?

Now you see it with David Franco or whatever.

Oh, we got a guy in the audience totally random.

Get get the hell out of here with yo now you see it at get the hell out of here with that shit.

What are you talking about?

This magician bullshit talking nonsense.

We got a guy in the audience.

I got 300 million.

Shut the hell up.

Nobody believes that shit.

Anyway, go ahead.

I'll mute you.

I can't go ahead.

You can't.

Go ahead, sir, go ahead.

I can't.

You keep muting.

Because I'm telling you, you have to.

Let his audience know he keeps muting.

And that's why I can't know.

Okay.

Okay.

So before we go forward, there's a communist, literally a communist in the audience that will come up and tell you, watch who you're talking to.

You don't know who?

Okay.

His name is ISKRA.

And he's Pravda.

His name is Pravda.

And he's a communist.

He hates capitalism.

No way.

All right.

Bring him up.

Iskra, go ahead.

Warn me about who I'm talking to.

Get up.

Pravda, come up.

He's doing thumbs down.

Come up, Pravda.

Tell him that he needs to know who he's talking to first.

Go ahead, Pravda.

Come on.

Let us all know.

Tell him.

Go.

Tell him.

Pravda.

This guy doesn't even understand who he's talking to.

First, he thinks I'm some poser that's pretending to be rich that doesn't know who he's talking to.

So let's just do this.

I know you do.

I know you do.

So let's go there first.

Let's get my credit score first.

And then we'll go from there.

And then you can shut your little broke ass up.

Did you leave?

And then I'll talk.

Did the guy leave?

Let's go.

You're a broke ass.

You know you're a broke ass.

So shut up.

Let's get Pravda.

Let's get Pravda.

Pravda, come up.

Tell the students.

No, I understand.

I understand.

And let's go from there.

All right.

I've been there for three months, whatever.

Your country's broke.

Communism's stupid.

But we'll start there.

So, all right.

Let me tell you how to get rich in America.

No, I'm not broke at all.

But let's go from there.

Okay.

So if you're an American and you're in high school and you want to make it, right?

You're an American.

Let's start there.

Okay.

I'm going to take you through a story.

I'm going to make you rich.

In about five minutes, I'll show you how to do it.

If you shut the fuck up and don't be a communist.

Go ahead.

Okay.

So, okay.

First thing you do, you're dead broke.

You have no money.

You have no money.

You start with a Pell Grant.

A Pell Grant is given by the government for broke people like me when I was in high school.

Okay.

I was a Puerto Rican from Brooklyn, New York.

Motherfucking Brooklyn, New York, little brown guy with a mom with an eighth grade education.

Right.

And I said, man, I want to go to college.

I don't know.

These guys with ties on.

I want to do that one day.

Okay.

Get a Pell Grant.

You go to fucking college, right?

You got to, and then at night, I was telemarketing, Marriott, Vacation Club, Sears, Robot, anything I could do to make extra money while I put myself through community college, University of Central Florida, University of Florida, got my fucking AA.

Okay, you call me, shut the fuck up while I'm talking.

So here's how this works.

So you put yourself through college.

And then I became a youth pastor at a church while I was at, while I was at University of Florida.

I was like, I'm going to be a youth minister at a church.

Great.

I'm going to make a few extra bucks here.

I'm going to become a history major, right?

I bachelor's in history.

I graduated.

Still no money, right?

I'm broke.

I got student loans.

I'm coming out.

I got my job at enterprise, rent a car.

And then I got a manager, right?

So you can get a manager, right?

Taught me about business for the first time in my life.

He said, show up.

Eddie Shook.

I after I graduated from university, so I'll talk slower for the communists.

So I graduated college, I paid for my loans, and then when I graduated, I got a job because I showed up with my degree and said, this is what I can do.

Skip to the part where you got 300 mil.

Okay, I'm about to get there.

It's going to take about four minutes.

That's a long time.

You didn't need four minutes.

You already encompassed four minutes talking about becoming a youth pastor and a Sears robot.

That wasn't four minutes.

Maybe, maybe, maybe you communist doing that.

It was a minute and 17 seconds.

Hey, you communists need four minutes to make millions.

Maybe the problem with communists, they're not patient.

So shut up for four minutes and I'll teach you how to become a millionaire.

That's how that works.

Ready?

So here we go.

Here we go.

Ready?

I graduated college.

True story.

And then I got my first job renting cars with a tie on.

Okay.

Okay.

So I rented cars.

And then while I was renting cars, I met business guys with great suits and beautiful ties.

Enterprise rent a car.

Have you read an enterprise?

So you rented from enterprise and then you illegally no I was I worked for enterprise.

Why is this so hard?

Excuse me.

I worked for enterprise.

That's what I did.

How could I know?

I thought you were renting them yourself and you were now we know why they're communists because they're not bright.

Okay.

They're not bright.

He can't follow a story.

So I literally graduated from Florida, came to Orlando.

I'll tell you who I am.

By the way, at the end of the story, I'll show you who I am.

How about that?

I'll show you who I am.

Okay.

So listen, listen.

Okay.

So I graduated from Florida.

University of Florida is where I graduated from.

Okay.

I moved to Orlando because my mom lived in Little Single Eyed.

And then I came to Florida and I said, I need a job.

And then they gave me a job and I put a tie on and decided to go to work like every like all of us do.

And then I showed up to a job and this guy gave me a job and said, rent my fucking cars.

Okay.

That's where we are in the story.

I rented his cars and then 65 hours a week vacuuming cars with my tie sweating Florida.

You get it.

It's not a good job.

Right.

And so, but then I met business guys like my man Ramy down there, like people that are listening right now that are listening that know who I am.

And then I clean their cars.

I clean their fucking cars.

And then, you know what they said to me?

They said, they said, Eddie, which is my real name, Eddie, I kind of like you.

Let's give you a chance.

Let's give you a chance.

Let's give you a chance.

I'm going to give you a job.

And then you know what they did to me?

They gave me a fucking chance, you fucking communist.

And you know what they did?

And you know what I did?

I didn't betray that chance.

And then I took the job.

And then, and then they said, we're going to teach you how to sell 401k plans.

And I said, what's a 401k plan?

They said, that's a savings plan for Americans where we can save for retirement so that people that are young can one day retire and we're going to teach them to invest in the stock market.

You know what I said?

When I was in Brooklyn, New York, I used to look at those buildings, the Twin Towers, and you should say, what goes on over there?

And they said, that's the stock market over there.

And then I said, and they said to me, they said,

Yo, that's that.

What does that mean?

They said that's where you can buy Walmart and fucking Uber and fucking Amazon and all these companies.

And I said, man, that's intriguing to me.

And I'm a little Puerto Rican from fucking Brooklyn that could do that.

So convince rich people to give you their money.

Freedom.

Freedom to invest.

Are you finished with the story yet or no?

No, no, no, no, I'm not finished.

I haven't made my millions yet.

And I'm not a liar.

And you're about to find out I'm not a liar because the Pravda came up who doesn't even like that I'm so so so here's so so so what I did is I took that knowledge I started selling 401k plants and then I found a fiduciary aspect to it that needed additional help and then I invented it myself a little kid from Brooklyn hold on hold on hold on hold on hold on Pravda because Pravda is a communist like you why you and Pravda because that's his real name it like I know his real name because he knows who I am no it's a count basically no he's he's on another count so so before you think this capitalist is full of like I got literally communists in here and it tells this guy is he no he's he's rich as fuck he's rich but it's it's a lot of it's a lot easily I've seen him send around thousands personally I wouldn't lie but everything else what have you seen that what have you seen that backs up what he says I've seen him send people thousands on here uh hey if I send you 500 will you shut up and let me finish my story if you send me 500 yeah I'll let you finish the story then he send me your Venno just shut up and let me finish my story when he cash has when he cash out can you can you uh acp.us and then donate on the website no i won't donate to communists but i must open open chicken open kick no because you're a liar because you guys are lying to the bro you're full of bro you see the only thing i agree with is that he's rich you seen this guy that he's 300 mil you've seen that yeah he was a um he played college ball he just he's just gonna tell you find rich people convince them to give you some money start a business get more rich people to give you money bro 300 mil you seen 300 miles hey do you want to see my brokerage bro this is no i'm worth more than that provda i'm worth 300 mil liquid no but i think no i'm worth more than that provda provda i'm worth more than that just so we're clear i don't know i've already thrown around thousands man you got to send me 10 does it really matter what he's worth at this point listen listen listen you could be throwing around thousands so we know we're not out so at this point we know i'm not full of yes this dude full of you are not worth 300 mil i've got to speak who gives a what he's worth why do you think i'm lying the point is that he made his money through freedom but i think he's lying about his success level okay this is what communists do is they try to like draw you down and like wait a minute socialism man but but like let me give you let me give you your escape let me give you your parachute your parachute is this well you might be just one person right that's your parachute let me give you your parachute we didn't even get there yet i need to see the money yeah we gotta see his money yeah provda you know you know probably sound like he know he don't sound like he knows no i would i would give you a couple million i'm not gonna lie but yeah no couple couple you got i could believe he's worth a couple mil i could believe well a couple provd i stop probably i would never get i would never hand people money if i was worth a couple of million are you stupid i mean a couple hundred dollars man i've done that and i'm a thousand if you are worth 300 mil why have you not retired why are you not retired i am retired i'm talking to you dummies on my retirement what are you talking about like this is my retirement 50k is nothing to you is that the case

Like literally, that's about the first three seconds of the market opening.

So that's nothing.

50K is the worst thing.

That's how you gain that kind of wealth.

You don't look at 50,000 as nothing.

50K is nothing to you, right?

Like literally nothing.

You're stupid.

If that is the truth, if that is the truth, that 50K is nothing to you.

The only way you can prove that is by giving it to people you hate, which are commies.

It's the only way.

Because you're basically saying, you're basically saying, I care so little.

It's so nothing to me.

I'll even the Palestinians take you out with a unibomber.

Because I hate you, commies.

No, because you commies.

50K is truly nothing to you.

New commies are the worst.

Okay, don't give it to us.

Like, literally, the worst.

Don't give it to us.

All right, you know what?

Don't give it to us.

I'll give it to the Palestinians before I give it to you.

Give it to a Palestinian charity right now and show us the receipt.

Do that.

Dude, I'll be honest with you.

Palestinian French.

And by the way, I gave money to you French.

Bruh, bruh, show us right now, send 50K to a charity of your choice and then show us the receipts.

You have to go ban for band now, man.

We don't want to hear any more words.

I don't want to hear words.

I don't want to hear more.

What's this guy's name?

Oz Alga.

If you want to talk, just send Santa some Bitcoin.

If you want to talk, don't be friendly.

I'll show you my day at trading.

No, no, no.

I'll show you my day.

Show us a receipt of you sending 50K to a charity right now if you're worth 300 mil.

That's what we want.

No, I won't.

I won't.

I won't do that because I don't believe in anything you believe in.

You're like a weirdo.

Send it to the charity.

But I'll show you my bank account.

I'll show you my bank account.

No, it's Photoshop.

So I know it's real.

I can do anything nowadays.

Okay.

Pravda, shame on you for giving this guy a platform.

Hey, Remy, you hear Pravda?

He's pretending like he doesn't know who he is.

You don't sound like he knows.

Pravda knows where I went to high school.

He knows my first name is.

Shut up and sit down.

And we're going to bring on the, we're going to have crypto going.

Pravda.

Tell him you know exactly.

Shut the fuck up.

Go ahead.

Of course you want me to shut up.

Of course you want to.

Bro, stop.

You are literally the fake Willy Wonka.

You're talking about your 300 million.

What the hell are you talking about?

Fake ass.

You're not George So.

I mean, what do you think this is?

You're like the complete fraud.

I didn't know I changed you.

You the goddamn monopoly guy from T Mu.

You're the damn monopoly guy from T-Mu.

You lying.

You monopoly guy with the monopoly.

Communist American existed until this.

You're the monopoly guy.

Your top hat is from Halloween USA.

All right, bro.

God, this is where you get your propaganda.

All right, you're as straight as Halloween USA Monopoly guys.

Shut the hell up.

Crypto, go ahead.

I don't know where we're at at this point.

Haz, I'm going to send you.

You befriend me.

I'm going to send you my bank account right now.

Who?

Bro, 50 bands or $300.

Who cares about his bank account?

And if he's a good boy, if he's a good boy, he might make a little money.

No, 50 bands that we want to hear it.

All right.

Go ahead and get crypto.

The point is, who controls the money supply right now?

Like a New Yorker, you're a fucking Moscow guy.

You're not a New Yorker.

You control the money supply right now.

You're a Moscow guy.

You're not a New Yorker.

Apparently, this guy, Eddie, couldn't.

Don't talk like a New York guy.

Yes, I do.

Apparently, he controls the money supply.

You're a Moscow guy.

Don't say bands.

Right?

Don't say bands, Haas.

You're a Moscow guy.

Good.

You're all Moscow guys.

You're not New Yorkers.

Don't talk like a New Yorkers.

Bro, I don't give a shit about New York.

Get out of my city.

Get out of my city.

Get out of my city.

They're very confused people.

If you walk in your city, it's my city when I walk in your city.

No, it's not.

And they're driven by the city.

When I go to your city, when I go to New York, get out of my city.

You idiot.

Get out of here.

You sell out.

You literally.

Shut your dirty ass out of my city.

Crypto, go ahead.

Everyone shut your head.

This guy's broke.

Crypto, go ahead, speak your piece.

I'm trying to think where I should start here, but basically.

Start with this guy's credit score.

This guy's cursing.

The leader of the host, the host has got a freaking 650 credit score.

Start with when they talk about China social credit, they want us to fall apart, but they'll weaponize credit against the world.

Exactly.

Robney, you're my greatest weapon.

Thank you so much.

This guy's broke, bro.

I'm laughing my ass off.

So broke.

What do you do for work, Haz?

I got a $5 billion investment.

What do you do, Haz?

I'm worth $600 million.

You're worth nothing.

What do you do for work?

No winner is what's your story?

Tell us your story.

We got a billion.

We got any story.

What's your story, Haz?

Tell us, I'll tell my story.

So, right out of high school.

I was broke, I had nothing, right?

Still broke.

Hold up.

I'm telling you my story, how I reached success, right?

Right out of high school I was broke, I had nothing, right?

So I w uh you know there's something called a Pell Grant.

And I got the Pell Grant.

Keep up, y'all.

Keep up.

And then, you know, I was working in and out of Sears with the Sears robot.

You know, beep boo bop, bitch.

The Seers Robot.

It was just beeping around, Sears.

You know, I was just there.

Don't ask me what I was doing.

Something was going on.

Anyway, uh

You know, I I moved down to uh

To Florida.

and I became a youth pastor.

I was making some some money as a youth pastor.

And I was singing at the church and I'm like, Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey You know, I was in the core and all that shit, you know, the the youth pastor and I was it was all going on.

I was making some money doing that, right?

And then uh I went to Orlando.

And uh

By this time, I'm worth about five million, you know?

It's like you gotta hustle, pull yourself up by the bootstraps, you know?

So I go to Orlando.

Sorry, I'm coughing because, you know, I got so much wealth that I you know, I'm it's like I got asbestos from the money, you know.

Anyway, I go to Orlando and I bring my Sears robot 'cause it's basically my companion now.

Um

And I start working for, I start selling renting out cars.

And I'm renting out a lot of cars, right?

And I'm in my tie.

I put my tie on.

I'm vacuuming, sweating.

You know, with the vacuum, cleaning out the cars.

And then uh these dudes in suits and ties came up.

And they're like, you see that bitch-ass Puerto Rican guy right there?

And I was like, yeah.

And they were like,

We can clearly see you're better than him.

So, whatever he's getting, you get double.

I said, damn, okay.

They said, we could tell you're smarter, better, superior in every respect.

I said, shit.

That's what you said, not me.

So at that point, you know, I was managing people's 401k, and now I'm worth 600 mil, which is double what this dude has.

You know, so follow my advice, just be better than this dude.

You tens of hundreds of millions will come your way.

Anyway, any questions on this you, bro?

I think you are way smarter than I thought.

Hold up, hold up, hold up.

I didn't finish my story, all right?

So I go to New York and I see the towers, and that's that's where Walmart and Uber.

And McDonald's, everything.

And I had a fiduciary opportunity.

And then the rest was history.

Then now the story's done.

All right, go ahead.

He said fiduciary.

He said fiduciary.

This motherfucker is really a lot smarter than I thought.

And I'm proud of you, bro.

I am so inspired by you guys.

I thought this guy was a good person.

He was fucking listening to your story, too.

God damn.

God damn.

This motherfucker was listening the whole time.

I thought this was some dumb commie.

This guy's not a dummy.

No.

I'll leave this room.

This guy's good.

You guys are good.

He's probably like a CIA operative.

Yeah, he's good.

He actually listens, too.

He said, hey, Jesus.us 50K.

No, this guy.

Send me your Venmo.

I'll send you some.

You're worth keeping online.

He's good.

Okay.

You're not a dummy.

I thought this guy was a dummy.

He's kind of an asshole.

Yes, he's an asshole.

He's a smart communist.

He's a smart asshole, though.

He's a smart asshole.

He's a smart communist.

He's going to be part of the central.

Yo, yo, the people at the side.

Haz, what's this guy's name?

Haz?

What do you call yourself?

The elite class.

I'm going to go on to some losers.

You seem to be good.

You're in good hands, folks.

All right.

This guy's smart.

This guy's no communist.

You're not a communist, are you, Haz?

Absolutely.

100%.

Okay.

All right.

I'll hang out a little longer.

I didn't know this guy's still claiming to be communist.

He's still a fucking dummy.

All right.

Crypto.

It's crypto's turn.

Go ahead, crypto.

Crypto, go.

You guys just kept me off track.

I mean, it's kind of entertaining, though.

You literally have contributed literally nothing the entire time.

I'm drinking.

I'm drinking.

Max, go.

I'm drinking top shelf scotch right now in my fucking theater.

Educate me.

He's a GTA character.

Go ahead, Max.

Thanks, guys.

So, like, I just wanted to ask, things are really heating up.

And you said maybe 20, 30 years will get to do some of the things you're planning to.

But, you know, seeing where the world is at right now, we were just wondering if there are any plans to kind of speed up things.

And we had a fun conversation about boycotting the Super Bowl.

I mean, I know that pretty.

We're not trying to speed up.

Wait, what are we doing here, Haas?

Boycotting the Super Bowl?

Fuck.

We're not speeding up anything.

That's glowy talk.

And what the hell you mean, boycotting the Super Bowl?

Oh fuck.

You were throwing some ideas and commenting about how bad the global situation is going.

No, we're not boycotting the fucking Super Bowls.

That's fucking ridiculous.

What are you doing?

What are we doing?

Max, Max.

Maya, shut the fuck up.

Max, listen.

There's probably like total, like maybe like 600 people listening to this at best, you know, right now.

Can you tell me what six hundred people not watching the Super Bowl is going to do?

Absolutely nothing.

Max, say nothing.

Can you say nothing?

That's up to you guys.

Like, Max, say nothing.

Max, say nothing.

Just say nothing.

Dude, there you go.

I gotta remember.

My God, I'm getting you.

You fucking lost your mic privileges.

Holy shit.

Fucking can't control yourself.

Anyway, we're trying to keep this a little bit serious, right?

He'll be back next time.

He'll be a recurring character.

Max, go ahead.

We're going to wrap the space up and bring everyone who's requesting on.

Max, the world is blowing up, right?

A war in Russia.

A war.

Talk about the Super Bowl business.

What is the Super Bowl going to do for us?

I mean, that's just about a publicitary stunt, getting more people into the movement, especially since they're already open.

All right, what I'm going to tell you is, I'm going to tell you to go and think about it for five more minutes and then come back, because I don't think you've thought about this.

Zayd, I'll bring you on right now.

Go ahead.

Go ahead, Zaid.

We don't know what happened to him.

Landless.

Go ahead.

And then the third worlder, so we're gonna have all these people on.

Ah, we brought all these people on.

See what's going on.

Can I make a quick statement?

Yeah, this dude's voice is like really loud.

What the hell?

Go ahead.

Haas, can I go ahead?

So uh I I remember criticizing Pravda about communism and why communism doesn't work.

And today, Mega, where you live?

I live in America.

Why?

Oh, because you got like an accent, something going on.

I don't know.

I know, it doesn't matter.

Anyway, just make a quick point and then you can give me a rebuttal.

I really want to hear from you.

So I remember criticizing Pravda, because Pravda is a hardcore communist, and I told him that one of the weaknesses of communism is the elites, when you become the Politburo, you will become corrupt.

And we saw this today with MAGA, right?

MAGA is a bona fide, literally, I know him really well.

He's 300 million.

It's true.

He donated a huge amount of money to me.

Now, that guy, right?

I noticed how you treated him.

You gave him a lot of airtime and you were like, you know, floating with him because he's got money.

Now, imagine some brokey just came online and he was trying to get rid of him.

So that shows you that money does matter, and all this communism is a LARP.

But to be honest, he was really entertaining.

I mean, we can't deny that.

No, but you guys all claim money doesn't matter and that, you know, communists will stick to ideals.

And I told Provider this uh al all along that yeah, that's what you say when you don't have money.

Once the money comes into the game, people start pumping real money, you will see your own people start selling you out.

Like that's what I'm saying.

There's only one way to test it.

Only one way.

ACP.us send us one thousand dollars and see what happens.

No, but I'm telling you, if you do make a lot of traction, right, you will be offered money.

Money will come to you.

They will try to shut you down with money eventually.

Initially, they'll try to shut you down by insulting you and stuff.

Then the real money will start coming in, and that's where the truth will come out.

Are you guys real or not?

And I guarantee you, what about why people stop selling you?

You want me to answer this seriously, or are you trolling here?

What's going on?

No, I'm serious.

This is a serious question.

Ultimately, people get caught up.

I'm not damned, this dude.

Just I muted you because you can't control yourself.

So, look, you may not believe this.

You don't have to believe it.

1000%, if I wanted to, if I wanted to ditch communism, if I wanted to ditch this entire path that I pursued.

I would probably have the opportunity to make millions.

And I have had that opportunity to make millions, live a very good life.

So, as far as that test, I guess I already passed it, you know?

So, I don't want to hear this nonsense.

Oh, once you guys, once you start seeing money and you got the chance to get money, then you're going to sell out.

And it's like, well, I've been had the chance to have money, you know?

So, you know, I don't know what you're even talking about.

So, go ahead.

That's my answer to you.

Well, that's not true, though.

I mean, the reality is, you haven't got the serious money yet.

I mean, this is kanging.

Like, I know your audience, maybe that just low IQ don't believe it.

I know, I've been in this fucking industry.

When it comes to real politics, okay, money talks, all this, you know, benevolent angels in the world, Hazard Al-Adin will do everything for us.

No motherfucker, you will sell us out.

Every human being will sell you up.

Processes, we don't need human beings.

Only a low IQ would believe a human being will save us.

There is no Jesus out there that will save us, okay?

There's no Hazard Al-Adin who will save us.

No, there will be processes that will save us, not the fucking individuals.

Individuals won't sell us out.

This is human nature.

I didn't say that I was going to save everybody, first of all.

Second of all, by claiming that everyone is fundamentally corrupt, you're just kind of telling on yourself.

Not everyone is like that.

There's a lot of people who are, I agree, but you're saying that everyone is, it's just not true.

You know, and young children from the cookie jars.

Give them the choice.

You have to set the hell out of this cookie jar nonsense.

We want to listen.

Listen, Lenin, Mao, you're telling me there is some pure people out there.

Yes.

Even Stalin was a criminal.

He was a thief.

Everybody does know.

How much money did Lenin, Stalin, and Mao have?

How much money do they have?

How much luxury did they have?

Do you know?

Do you know the facts?

Go ahead.

Let's hear it.

Xi Jinping's official salary is less than the McDonald's workers.

And if you believe that, you're a retard.

Why is that so hard to believe that some people really do just devote themselves?

Because this is fake.

It's not me, Kenyan.

I don't do it.

Bro, the truth is, you're not ready to hear this.

There's some people who straight up do not give a fuck about your cringe Gucci bags and your cringe fucking Prada and whatever fuck you wear.

Your dumbass Rolexes and your stupid ass cars.

Some people straight up don't give a fuck about that and I'm one of them.

I literally do not give a shit about the things you breathe, live, and die for.

You die for a fucking Gucci belt.

I spit on your Gucci belt.

You fucking die for a Birken bag.

I shit in your Birken bag, light it on fire and throw it in a fucking lake because I don't give a fuck about the things you live for.

Your principles are these stupid, meaningless luxury items you don't even need.

My principles are the eternal laws of history itself.

Bitch!

Go ahead, I'll mute you.

Go ahead.

Tell us about how everybody gives a fuck about dumbass.

Tell us about that.

That's why they should talk about my ACP party while Jackson Inkel flies around Moscow with a Rolex on and Kanging as I am the leader.

Here's I'm smoking cigars, guys, with champagne and living a great life.

Yeah, dear leader is living like King Jong-un and we as the fucking slave clause.

But I'm the chairman of the party, okay?

So I don't know what you're talking about.

Second of all, Jackson can buy whatever he wants.

He can live however he wants to live because he's not taking money from the party.

He's making his own living.

And there's nothing wrong with that.

But you're not you're accusing us of only caring about that.

Go ahead and tell us about everyone in the world gives a fuck about Gucci flip-flops and sandals, and that's the meaning of life.

Go ahead, tell us.

Tell us how, for everyone in the world, the meaning of life is a stupid ass Birkin bag they make in a Chinese factory, and then they send it to Italy, and someone wipes their ass and smidges it on it, and then it smells a little bit like poo-poo.

And then they say it's made in Italy because some sweaty Italian with a mustache sweat on it one time, and it was all made in China anyway.

Go ahead, tell us about how we all give a fuck about that.

Go ahead.

I don't tho think uh it's about Gucci handbags.

I don't give a shit about Gucci handbags doesn't mean I'm not material.

What are you claiming?

Every human being.

In fact, communism is based on materialism.

It's understanding that materialism

Can you shut the hell up for two seconds and just explain what every human being cares about, according to you?

Because.

There's only so once you have like a roof over your head and you have the basics, all the other stuff is kinda extra, right?

So tell us about how we all care about this really extra shit.

And it's the only reason we live is 'cause we want a stupid car.

Even though Toyotas are the best cars, even though, you know, Japanese cars, they make the best ones.

Well, Chinese do now, but you know, you can't get them in the US.

Honda engines are better than Ferrari engines.

Tell us what you know, tell us tell us what we're missing out here.

Go ahead.

You know how I thought you were a real communist.

Like if I wanted all it's a double mu let me mix my house.

I thought you were a genuine communist, okay?

So you thought I thought you understood that communists believe materialism is real.

We don't promise in the afterlife that life will be great.

Because what that's what you're kagging?

Let's all be papayas.

Do everything hold on

Doesn't matter, guys.

In the afterlife, you will get 72 virgins.

Bro, what the hell are you talking about?

You think materialism and Marxism is the same thing as when your pastor talks about it?

Materialism

Oh, this dude's a f okay, this d apparently this dude is uh

Is no good.

We're gonna move him from the space.

Showtime just said some shit about this dude.

I believe Showtime Showtime doesn't lie.

But uh apparently this dude creepy as hell.

I don't wanna hear about that shit.

But uh, you know, materialism in Marxism is not the same thing as when you hear the word materialism, usually you're talking about people who only care about worldly things.

And that's usually like they're obsessed with wealth, they're obsessed with luxury, they're obsessed with pleasure and hedonism.

That's not what the word means in Marxism.

The word materialism in Marxism.

is about understanding that there are objective laws of history and economic development that govern changes, both political, social and cultural, and so on.

So it's a very different things.

You know, it's got nothing to do with forsaking

Or totally embracing, you know, trivi you know, Stalin lived like an ascetic.

You know, Stalin he slept on a cot, you know, he only had one cigar, he had one outfit basically.

He lived like a saint, he lived like an ascetic, you know.

So

That you know, and he was a materialist, so you don't get it twisted.

This is ignorance we're hearing.

It's pure ignorance.

All right, Michael, entrepreneurial innovator.

What's going on?

Go ahead.

What's going on with the innovation entrepreneurially?

And then we'll bring Lance.

Oh Jesus Christ, it's like people like Somebody fucking talk right now.

Michael, go ahead.

What's up with the finance team today?

I don't know.

I really don't know.

But it's caused a discourse.

Red design, go ahead.

Michael, go ahead.

You can unmute.

Oh, I gotta unmute everyone.

Go ahead.

Every Michael first.

This dude's got a suit and tie.

What's going on, Michael?

I was gonna I was gonna say damn I know I'm in a communist space, but shit I thought I could have at least a couple words.

No, I'm just joking.

Um

Alright, anything?

Yeah, I was gonna say the innovation about North Korea, um, you know, they make the best chips.

You should uh check them out.

That's a knee slapper.

Anything else?

That's all?

Yeah, no, no, but like, I know I had a little mishap today, but like, if you d I'm serious, like, you really check it out.

Like, it was five thousand pons.

Like that that was pretty that's pretty incredible for uh a compan or a uh country like that, wouldn't you say?

Uh D P R K is a very advanced society, very strong, powerful and resilient society.

Oh yeah, I mean I definitely agree.

I mean I think they're very strong.

I think they're uh

All around, um, just a great, uh, you know, a great country to rely on.

That's good, some good common ground.

Thank you, Michael.

The one thing, the one thing, though, I did hear some reports about them going to Russia and like fucking around with the Russian girls and all that.

I guess they just saw white, white ass for the first time, and they're like, Oh my god, all right, Michael, he's watching too much pornography on his uh office job, his office job break.

He's sitting in his cubicle.

And he's he's spending too much time watching pornography in his office on his desk.

So Michael, you need to get better habits.

You need to get more

More perspective on life.

Go ahead, Landless.

You've been waiting for a long time.

No, thanks, thanks.

Look, uh I'm I'm coming from South Africa, so

I was wondering if the American Communist Party has been paying attention to

The paid visit by the South African President to Washington.

And particularly the attitude of Washington toward the

The Socialist Party of South Africa called the the EFF, right?

We are with the EFF and we are with the Commander in Chief, Julius Malema.

And uh we are in full solidarity with them and we reject the White House's nonsense provocations.

About South Africa.

Well that's that's that's satisfying to to hear.

Now, more more theoretically perhaps, if the what should be our reading towards uh imperialism in the

in the current century, particularly in relation to the fourth industrial revolution.

Because our own it's a it's a complex question, but um

I would say imper imperialism has become unipolar imperialism, and it doesn't have much meaning outside of that, in my view.

Imperialism is the unipolar world order.

You know.

Um.

It's no longer a general phenomena, but a concrete.

Global system centered in the USA.

And with respect to the fourth industrial revolution, imperialism is the number one impediment, or superimperialism, rather, is the number one impediment to that revolution being rolled out on a global scale, which is what China is leading the way in doing.

China's whole initiative is to basically unleash the fourth industrial revolution on a global planetary scale, and it's the forces of imperialism that are retarding that prospect.

So, this is my analysis.

Oh, okay.

No, thanks.

That's very uh refreshing uh and a very d int interesting perspective, you know.

But look, the then the follow up question will be

Should we anticipate the fourth industrial revolution to resolve the historical and very stubborn inequality, poverty and unemployment experi especially experienced by the third world, and South Africa in particular?

There will be no solution to such issues without revolutionary forces and the third world, it's a big

The third world as a concept is

Uh lacking because it doesn't address the specificity of different regions and conditions.

So there's no way for such issues to be solved without revolutionary forces re-establishing economic sovereignty.

And that's why we support the EFF, because that's what they're fighting for in South Africa.

And it's it's creating a new principle of politics based in the principle of economic sovereignty and the economic question.

So it will not be solved technocratically.

It will be solved.

With uh once again raising the property question to the fore.

So that's our view.

No, thanks.

Now, the last thing is this, right?

And I read your post, I think, a couple of months ago.

Landless, thank you so much, but that was a lot of questions.

Lance, go ahead.

Yeah, so this um

As you can see, my little descriptor, my profile, I'm an anti-Ismist, right?

And I read this somewhere a while back, and it was very provocative, but it got me thinking.

And this person said, I can't remember who it was, what article was it in a book with an article?

It said that, you know, ultimately

Every ruler, you know, or government or whoever's in power ultimately can only govern, you know, sustained.

You could have a coup, you could have an immediate takeaway with it.

You can't have sustained rule without the consent of the governed.

And, you know, obviously in a democracy, parliament, republics, you know, you have a little bit of elections and you have some.

But he meant even a dictatorship or a monarchy or anything.

Ultimately, without the consent of the government, you're done.

Just ask Marie Antoinette, let them eat cake.

And the hubby Louis XIV, they were rich.

They can afford to pay the army really good.

You know, keep your soldiers happy and they won't turn on you and all that.

And they got their heads chopped off.

So having ultimate power doesn't matter.

Eventually, they'll chop your head off too.

Dictatorship.

Frederick the Great, maybe he was made a product of his time.

But he was in the Enlightenment.

And he conquered other parties, other countries, or that's what you did.

You needed more land.

So he did conquest.

But he was loved.

And he had everybody from young Mozart to an old Bach.

And he had all the thinkers, you know, and Enlightenment, you know, thinkers, provocative thinkers into his court.

You can't pick your parents.

You can't pick your king.

You could have Caligula or Nero.

You could have Frederick the Great.

So, you know.

Oh, I can't hear him.

What happened?

Hello?

Hello?

Uh I think he disconnected.

Straight up.

I think he disconnected.

Um damn.

Mm.

I I straight I don't know what happened, I think he just connected, I dunno.

Well, thank you so much for that.

That we did we did get some information from that, so you know, thanks for that.

We'll bring on Edelweiss.

Go ahead, Edelweiss.

Howdy.

Mm-hmm.

What's going on?

Just one second.

I've got a question that I've been wondering.

Okay.

Um so I've missed a lot of context, I just hopped in, I'm here at just a break at work.

Um what has been you know kind of briefly touched on?

Well, not a whole lot, so you'd be the first to really introduce something.

Okay.

Well, I guess we can just start with what I consider to be the elephant in the room, and that's um

allegations of chauvinism against uh ACP okay um you know looking at the community in the discord and looking at responses here on Twitter um is there accountability for that is there policy for that is there is that a priority of the proletariat is that what we're looking to like what is kind of your take on that 'cause I'm out of the loop almost entirely as it worked too much we have standards and rules uh as a party for party members um and regarding infrared and our discord because our party doesn't have a discord we we tend to have standards but those are more difficult to police because anyone can be an infrared fan technically but the community tries to police itself in the best ways and I see.

But but yes, do we consider I do I have a question then to follow up then.

Do we consider things like the liberation of women or the liberation of people of color to be necessary for the proletariat as well?

Look, uh no no one has a problem with um you call them people of color.

This just means non-white people.

No one has an issue with non-white people and women.

The thing is that people use politically incorrect language on social media and there's a range of speech there that I guess is higher than average for leftist communities who, you know, definitely I just kind of see it as a kind of Victorian tone policing thing going on.

I don't really know how much that's related to the actual substance.

I mean, I mean, substantively, for example, what would be a political program or a political agenda for the liberation of non-white people and women right now?

That's something they included womanism.

Okay, what does that mean?

So womanism was like a kind of like a feminism thing.

What should that mean for us?

Like what what concretely should that mean?

So acknowledging you know the intersection of racism and sexism, it's just more inclusive and more expansive approach to mainstream feminism.

Sorry for uh talk about acknowledgement is fine, but what what concretely does that translate into in practice?

What does it mean?

Well in in the context of

W womanism specifically, it was a response to, you know, civil rights movements.

Um but drawing the parallel here

Like, is it a policy?

Is is it s is it priority?

You know, feminism, you know, the w women's liberation, subclasses.

Tell us what it means in practice today.

Womanism specifically or feminism?

Because I'm kind of more so.

See, we're concerned with we're not concerned with shaping perceptions when it comes to people's cultural attitudes, as much as we're concerned with frax is not optics, right?

Optics is fine.

Of course, we care about optics, but we're not interested primarily when it comes to these issues in doing this kind of cultural analysis of, oh, you use that word, this is your attitude, this is how you feel.

We're more interested in a concrete and binding principle of organization and action.

That's what we're interested in.

So, because we're a collective, but we are not interested in engineering the feelings of individuals on various different things, you know, because we think that's impossible to do authentically.

I know that leftist communities try to do that, and I think they fail.

I think that they try to tone police people and they try to eliminate the germs of racism and sexism and transphobiaism and whateverism from people's minds, but they're still there, and it doesn't change anything.

It's just that people, you know, they just police how they express their real thoughts and feelings, and they just repress them.

So, okay, I can agree with that.

I can agree with that.

Right.

So, you know, for us, we're more interested in what do these things mean concretely for us today?

Because, for example, we don't practice any discrimination.

We don't discriminate against women.

They're fully equal within our party.

We are not against working with different communities.

We're not even saying that we, you know, all black people must follow us.

If black people want to create their own organizations and actually have a foothold in their own communities, we're humble.

Same with a bunch of other different groups and peoples.

We're humble because it's all about who can organize the masses.

If we're unable to organize black communities and leaders from the black or the brown, the indigenous communities can do that themselves.

We want to have a dialogue with them and work with them.

So I don't see how that's chauvinistic.

I think that we're very humble when it comes to such matters.

I don't think we're, for example, forcing, we're not saying that we have all the answers, no one else has any answers.

We're just saying we're trying to create a united principle of this thing where we want to try and build a unifying principle of organization that unites people across race, across their culture.

And we're not saying we have successfully done that.

We're saying that our organization is founded upon the goal of doing that.

So we're humble about it.

We're not claiming we have already united the entire country in the form of our organization.

Our organization doesn't reflect all of America's communities right now.

We don't have a foothold in the indigenous communities.

We don't have the biggest foothold in a lot of different communities.

This kind of does segue into my final kind of question before I stop hogging the mic here.

I was kind of looking at how your approach is, not your specifically approach, but the organization's approach to conservatism and conservative ideologies.

Because I do see, well, I mean, I may have seen on Twitter, which again is like kind of its own kind of universe, right?

But this is why I'm asking to you directly now that I got you here.

What is our approach towards conservative individuals?

Because I'm like a super, super hardcore leftist, and I don't really think that we should be personally, I don't think we should be taking the time to try to convert these people more left before we take action ourselves.

But what is your guys' approach on that?

Because I have seen mega communism.

I don't see the thing is, a word like conservative, sometimes it just refers to people's unfiltered set.

Sometimes it doesn't refer to an ideology, but it refers to a people's resistance to or unwillingness to accept some of the newest trends that come from the media or whatever.

So.

Is that conservatism?

Who knows?

But what I can say is that I guess it's reactionary.

Well, I disagree with that.

I think it's not reactionary to not buy into the latest trends that so happen to be pioneered by the hegemony.

I mean, I think the hegemony is actually what's reactionary.

And people's norms and conventions and their consciousness and their thoughts about things can be ignorant, they could be uninformed, but a lot of it is also rooted in their wisdom and their experience living normal lives and living in communities, raising families, working for a living, getting by.

And so, you know, overall, we have a profound patience because of that fact.

We have a profound patience.

And we are not phased or offended or clutching our pearls because of the unfiltered, raw thoughts, emotions, and manners of expression of the American people.

They don't kind of trigger us into a knee-jerk reaction of just saying, oh, that's fascism, that's this, that's that.

We have a profound patience.

And some people say that makes us reactionary or conservative or whatever they want to say.

But I think what it really makes us is patient, you know, and patience doesn't mean we know better than the masses and that we're waiting for them to come around to our view.

It means that we're not being presumptuous about all these ideological projections and stuff just because people don't talk the same way as us or they don't use the same words that we do.

And we, you know, that's what you're getting at.

Right.

I mean, you know, that's that's really what comes down to.

I mean, someone can be extremely politically incorrect and not use the right words, but actually come to the correct conclusion along the way.

And they don't design that that deserves to be cultivated and recognized rather than punished just because the form of people's cultural expression is not considered acceptable by like very isolated.

And if I must say, bubbles, these are bubbles that are forming in colleges and sites of citadels of privilege, if you will.

There's a term for that that I'm forgetting.

It's escaping my mind right now.

Not Puritanism.

That's not the right word.

But I know what you're getting at.

Yeah.

So yeah, that's really it.

I mean, we just have a radical patience and a level of tolerance, I guess, that a lot of people.

Do you think that there is?

Sorry for cutting off, but I guess my question then is: do you think that there is no value in putting at the forefront things like LGBT, you know, women, more marginalized groups?

Do you think that there's no benefit in putting that at the forefront of your policies to maybe attract more leftists?

No.

I mean, women is a different question because I don't know what's meant by that.

But overall, the things that leftists usually virtue signal over and stuff that no, there's no utility in putting that at the forefront.

And I can explain very carefully why.

Because what we call leftism is basically a hodgepodge of unprincipled affiliations.

And I'm not saying this to be a moral grandstander.

I'm saying it because there is no authoritative center of gravity outside the Democratic Party.

These are people concentrated in corporations, in college campuses, and they are loose affiliates of the hegemony, right?

But when the going gets tough, they are not going to totally declare independence from the Democrats and stand upon the basis of an entirely new principle of authority and organization.

As soon as the connection to the hegemony, which is also a connection to all the things that are considered, I'm definitely referring to people over that line, people that have disavowed the Democratic Party.

Well, I don't think there's a lot, to be honest.

I mean, I think on the college campuses.

The political center of gravity is still the Democratic Party.

Even among those who have disavowed it, they have not deigned to establish an alternative because I can agree with that, yeah.

Just like a lot of anarchists will oppose the state, you know, like Robert Evans or whatever, they'll still acquiesce to the existing state because by opposing the state in general, they are in practice accepting the state we have in particular, right?

Unless they partake in like dual power or whatever, right?

Exactly.

Unless they partake in dual power and create a new authority.

The only way to really challenge the state is by founding a new principle of state.

It's basically dialectics, you know?

Yeah, yeah.

So that's that's basically the issue is that it's trendy and it's safe for a lot of people because the power is safe.

I mean, it's considered normal.

I'm not even moralizing.

It's just people go to college campuses.

This is a range of acceptable opinion in the institutions they're familiar with and they're comfortable with.

And there is definitely a pipeline where, you know, through Hassan Piker and others, people start to quote unquote become more radicalized with more than one thing.

He was what initially radicalized me.

Yeah, and that initially burning.

Yeah, but more and more radical ranges of opinion become tolerated that are accepted within the hegemony.

But when the hegemony shuts that down and then leftists are thrown into the underground alongside the right-wing extremists, what then?

I don't think there's going to be a lot of current form of leftism is not going to survive that.

When the crackdown begins on the Hassan Pikers and stuff, and leftists are thrown in the wilderness, and there's no sanction for them in Hollywood and anything, you know, admittedly, I think that's going to happen.

They're going to have to realize how brutal the world outside the hegemony is.

And then this whole thing about clutching pearls over language and stuff, it's over, you know.

Well, I guess I wasn't more so at the end of that, talking more about the language, but more so, like, there's a lot of real issues.

Let's talk about, for example, let's just bring up trans individuals for a moment, right?

A lot of to them, this issue is important enough a topic that it overpowers everything else that is in their lives.

It's less so politicizing it, and more so, and you know, less being identity politics, and more so being the fact that it's their identity, period.

And it gets to the point where, because of the hegemony and because of the bigotry, you know, they end up taking their own lives.

It is a commonly known kind of thing.

Is that a completely disconnect thing from?

I am really hostile to this idea that some Marxists in the West had, which is that they were searching for a revolutionary subject who had nothing to lose, right?

And they couldn't find it in the working class.

So, what they did is they want to find people whose very sexual identity forces them to, you know, to basically be radicalized.

And I think that's kind of that whole I think that's even degrading to the transgender people, to be honest, because you're basically holding them hostage.

No, I agree with that point.

And you're prohibiting them the possibility of just being normal and like anyone else, having the bare minimal of the subjective gap and distance from which to actually choose what they consider to be the correct political.

But this thing of holding people at gunpoint, whether it's the transgender issue or another one, which is, you know, you'll be surprised I mentioned this, is sometimes people say we need socialism or we're all going to go extinct because of climate change.

It's another kind of, I don't, I don't like this.

It's, it's, it's.

I'm on that camp.

I only see a socialist revolution or human extinction, but not specifically to climate exchange either.

Look, maybe, and not necessarily saying it's wrong.

I'm saying it's a wrong way of going about justifying the subjective basis of socialist consciousness.

No, I can agree with you.

No, I absolutely can agree with you.

I tend to just use that talking point when I'm upset and talking to like, you know, normies or whatever.

Yeah, I think that weaponizing people's sexuality degrades them for political goals.

And also weaponizing.

Well, that's true.

That's true.

It's just that the reason that I bring that up now is because a lot of them find comfort within the hegemony through the Democratic Party, kind of like how you mentioned, which has failed them.

Well, um yes, and so where would they go?

Well, I I mean

We have to ask the question not of where will this sexual minority go, but we have to pose the question from a class perspective.

If you want me to answer that question very broadly and vaguely, what unifying principle can defend and impose the necessary justice so that everyone's dignity is protected and everyone can be an equal before the law and be an American and be part of a greater whole?

And I think that would be the Communist Party.

But catering exclusively to a small portion of the population, 1% of the population, at the expense of the majority is suicidal and it's wrong.

But that doesn't mean it's not important to also be just and have principles in the sense of you're not going to tolerate abuse, you're not going to tolerate inhuman torture and sadism and so on.

So that's what I would say.

I don't think.

I I look, i if it gets to a point where you know people are hunting transgenders for sport, which they're not, but if it got to that point, we would condemn that phenomenon and oppose it.

But

I don't think that they necess I don't think we're at a point where they need to be protected in that way.

I don't see that.

I don't even think it's ever been that way, you know?

I see, I see, I see.

I hold a kind of a a different opinion on that topic, but we're a bit limited on time.

We can shift gears back to you saying leftists are eventually going to be, you know, essentially kicked out by the hegemony and being, you know, in the wilderness.

I also agree with that.

I ask you, what should we do then?

Well, I mean, we already have been doing it for years.

We've already been acting in such a way as as though that's already happened.

And it's allowed us to take a principled stance on a lot of different issues that many leftists can't.

And you know, there's you know, the difference between us and Hassan Piker, it's really two or three years, you know, because two or three years from now he's going to have the positions we do now, just like he's starting to have the positions we had and we were canceled for two or three years ago from today.

So, you know, this is really you just have to already build the principle of organization now and not wait for that.

I've got one last thing.

When you mentioned Americans earlier, I I've noticed that you know word kind of floating around in ACP kind of spaces.

Uh do do we not disavow the colonialism and imperialism under the American label and want to make our own thing?

Yeah, we oppose imperialism and we oppose colonialism, but the American Communist Party is a communist party of this nation.

It's not claiming to be the leading party of Mexico or the leading party of no, of course, I see that, but to me, like me personally, and I don't know about other leftists, but to me personally, the American flag is stained in genocide and blood and built by slavery and maintained by colonialism and imperialism.

And I would want, I personally would want to distance myself from being a patriot and being the American flag.

It is definitely stained by those things, but it's also stained by other things that have been forgotten because the ruling class wants you to forget them.

And our job as communists is to remind people the alternative history of America, right?

What Howard Zinn called the people's history.

And that like the communist riots that led to working protections, or you're finding things like that?

Yes, yes.

And even things that were not even explicitly communist, but undoubtedly reflected progressive and democratic tendencies among the people.

I mean, racial unity of poor farmers in the 1800s, you know, abolitionists.

There's so many different things.

There's so many hidden, miraculous things and struggles that were buried and erased and forgotten because the ruling class wanted us to forget them.

I see.

I see.

I am running a little low on time here.

I'm probably hogging the mic.

I feel kind of bad.

If you can maybe recommend me a reading or two to leave me off.

Uh, or maybe something else I can read to continue the conversation.

Kind of, I don't know, I'm just trying to read stuff and learn stuff, man.

Yeah, um.

Well, I would s have you read our declaration?

Not really.

I j I mostly just kind of just see discourse from other leftists and ACP people.

I would read our declaration that's pinned.

It's really short short read.

It's really easy to read.

I could definitely recommend that as a reflection of our party's views on what it means to build a party in this country and so on and so on.

Okay, okay.

Do would you would you say you guys uh follow any sort of footsteps of any great leftists throughout history at all, or it's kind of our own thing?

Well, I mean, we're Marxist-Leninists, so it's Marx, Lenin, Engels, the whole thing.

Okay, okay.

Yeah.

I consider myself a Marxist-Leninist.

I like some Holgel works, so all right.

Well, you've answered a lot of my questions.

I appreciate you for uh even though I kinda I kinda came out swinging for uh you know being respectful with me and taking me seriously.

For sure, all right, see you later.

You guys have a good time.

Bye bye.

Thank you.

Alright guys, we're gonna wrap up the space.

Um

So it was great.

I'll see you guys next week.

Bye bye.

Ah man.

I am actually exhausted, for real.

Like I'm actually exhausted.

Um super exhausting.

What happened with the Patreon?

Good question.

Sunday, I'll be coming back with the Patreon QA.

I'll give you guys some time to ask questions.

I'll do it Sunday.

Just remind me.

I straight up gotta go to bed, though, for real.

Um oh another str like weird thing guys two days ago

I was one seventy three, right?

I just weighed myself.

I was 177.

How did I gain four pounds in two days?

That's fucking crazy.

It was the same time of day, too.

It's like insane.

And I'll tell you why, because I've been eating.

Crazy.

Like, you know how I was dieting?

I've been dieting and then I've been intensely in the gym.

Like I have an intensity of my lifting is intense, weightlifting.

And then my cardio is intense because this is not going to sound like a lot.

I do 4.4 miles per hour for 45 minutes.

Which to me that's pretty straining.

I don't know if you guys that's nothing, but continuously with no breaks, it's kind of straining, you know?

So like I'm sweating all the time and that's on top of the lifting that I do.

That's keep that in mind, right?

That's on top of the lifting, I do.

So the lifting wears me out, and I do that, all right?

Anyway, uh

And and I've just been like knock I've been losing weight, been like super lightheaded, super tired.

And so I've just been eating like fucking crazy, like eating a fuck ton, you know, like eating a shit ton.

Like eating, eating, eating.

It's all I do.

And uh I've been eating sh like shit, burgers, fries, pizza, whatever.

And I'm like, it's still not enough because I'm so fucking.

knocked out from

All this weight I'm rapidly losing.

But uh anyway.

Alright, guys, but I'm, yeah, I'm gonna go to bed, guys.

I'll see you Sunday, alright?

Bye-bye.