Racking up Ws

Study driver bonk

Study colour slash

Wait so this noise media.

I'm not sure if I can do it.

I'm glad to hold him back.

Why is the little best?

Estude mendan, es allas cutsurías es.

I'm not sure if I can do it.

You come and must the leader

That is the

This next to spare.

Edrena Suleiman.

Do was alone.

And yes, we're still the box.

And that's the last of the stem

You come and I'm deliver

You come and last in this

Unscant

They're shaking it.

Hip on the mouse that needs

Come Austin.

They come as a leave.

They come close and

Tours that shall

To the gas.

Talking 100, 100, 100.

My city says I run it cause I never ever fumble.

Harry Thomas said, make the pretty woman love me.

I can be a poor, be a homie, be a plumber.

Sunset summer, all black puller.

I got more gas than the H3 hummer.

I'm baped up, really, gorilla or grizzly.

Landin' Les Giddy on the way to Surilar.

Lev's getting left.

This shit by repetition.

My outfit and hit for a condom of cracker ticket.

Wally Valon, really the hardest to rep the city.

I'm hungry, you're up by demons.

Dreamin' the message to the sum, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

She leave them pictures in your sum, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Bitches.

Bit it!

Colt was born, asking ye shall receive what a Christ in unbelief.

Now he's shepherded.

Now he's our shepherd.

Jeremiah saved from

Going out of the campus.

American stamp, what's going on?

Say, Long to here.

Anyway, what's up, guys?

Um

Wow, what a fucking.

I don't want, let's not get arrogant, guys.

Don't get arrogant.

God punishes the arrogant, humbles the arrogant.

We're very humble.

We've been very humble, okay?

We will still be humble.

Comrade Kid, what's up?

But look, we've been going through a dark ages under Biden.

To be frank, it was a dark ages under Biden.

It was a demonic atmosphere, and our enemies had the high ground.

It was a bad time.

Shit is getting a little lit right now.

I'm not gonna lie, all right.

Uh it's going crazy right now.

USAID is getting cut.

It's chaos in the regime.

It's in disarray.

The CIA and FBI are melting down and freaking out.

Everyone's freaking out.

Um and they the the liberal left lawn guy, what's going on?

The liberal left is so fucking demoralized, it's crazy.

And I want to show you the epitome of that demoralization in the aftermath.

Of the EFF's announcement that they have done a podcast with Jackson.

Um

I want to show that to you.

Um, because I think you've all seen on X the reactions to that.

I will talk about that in a moment.

But let me show you these reactions as they happen behind closed doors, you know, in the

In um Johnny's Discord server, which we're still in.

Anyway, look at this.

Tag him.

Look at them panic.

You have a blue check mark!

Please stop this from happening!

Stop!

By the way, this is the lumpin' guy.

And

You know.

Contact they're they're they're contacting them.

They're writing messages and emails and everything.

They're emailing them.

Um I just wanted to show you that as an update.

Uh well, yeah.

Um

We have well, I'm not gonna even say anything.

I'm just gonna let you sit on it.

But needless to say, the reactions have been delicious, frankly.

Oh, it has been a good day.

It has been a good day.

We've been racking up W's on W's on W's.

Just W's on W's.

Okay.

As soon as I look, we have had Jackson has had contacts with the EFF for over a year.

Like, they know him, he knows them.

But.

I've told you guys that, but you know, people don't believe it, they don't know.

Um

I don't want to jinx it, but I'm just going to say this is far from the end.

This is just the beginning.

And you're gonna see that soon, okay?

You're gonna see that very soon.

We have had contacts with the EFF and those contacts are turning into relationships, official relationships, and you're gonna see soon, sooner rather than later.

I can honestly devote the entire stream to going on a spiel, theoretically explaining in depth exactly the dynamic that's going on.

Exactly what led the Infrared Collective to be so inspired by the EFF in the first place.

And it was precisely because we correctly understood the class dynamics in South Africa, and when we mapped on those same class dynamics going on in South Africa onto the United States, we found something very strange.

The entire Baiswa, the entire PMC left, is in the DA.

One for one.

And the EFF is closer to MAGA populism than it is to the American leftists.

Far closer class wise, sociologically, culturally.

A lot of people have drawn a lot of attention to the EFF's protest of the Uganda law and its very progressive politics within South Africa, social socially progressive views.

But what they're ignoring is the class politics uh sorry, the class dimension of the EFF.

They're ignoring the fact that

The context is so different such that in South Africa, nobody is getting canceled for being a bigot.

They don't have a cancel culture over being a bigot toward the LG whatever the the the the rainbow thing.

Nobody's it's not mandatory, it's not being forced on everyone in society and on children.

So what the EFF has done is position itself in a way where it's trying to protect minorities against mob violence and mass societal violence.

And that doesn't require it to sacrifice norms.

EFF doesn't sacrifice and destroy norms.

These are normal people.

And they're not socially engineering them.

I mean, they are militant.

They're not snowflakes.

All right.

We knew this and we understood it.

And I kept trying.

I mean, look, these people made when remember that stream where I was like, is it a contradiction that we don't exactly see eye to eye on every single cultural issue?

Maybe, but who who what's wrong with contradictions?

I said that, and then they re- the way they responded to that was, oh, listen.

The EFF doesn't fuck with people like you.

You are the DA in South Africa.

You know, we knew this.

We've always known this.

We've known this for over a decade.

I feel like it's stupid that I even need to point it out.

Yes, the EFF.

Do you even know what's going on in South Africa?

The EFF has been getting accused of being fascist for a decade.

They're constantly getting canceled by fucking snowflake-triggered crybaby lip tards all the fucking time.

I mean, just because it has these niche um

positions on cultural issues, which b by the way, nobody really cares about.

I mean, it's not that's something that the rank and file it's not extraordinarily popular among them, but nobody really cares.

Like it's not it's not a focus at all.

It's a very marginal issue, you know?

And because

They had the position on that issue that aligns with, you know.

Western international left.

An assumption was made that the EFF is closer to the Baiswoa than they are to us and to ACP.

But nothing could be further than the truth.

The EFF, at the end of the day, is a vulgar populist organization rooted in the people.

They are not a politically correct, snowflake, glasses-wearing, libtard organization.

They are rooted in the masses.

They are outspoken.

They hate the media.

They are constantly fighting with the media.

And Malemma calls all these cancel culture people crybabies.

He literally, that's what he calls them.

I could tell these people knew nothing about the EFF or Malemma when I see them doing engaging in behavior that's just gonna get them called crybabies by Malemma, you know, if he heard about it.

And like the South African people in the comments were saying.

Even though the EFF and Jackson might disagree about some things, which they don't really, because it's two different issues in different countries.

The EFF doesn't cancel people.

They don't like they don't ca they don't do this thing where they're gonna cancel you.

They they understand priorities.

They understand what primary contradictions are.

They don't call you fascist for disagreeing with them on cultural stuff.

For them, the most important thing is anti-imperialism, period, you know?

We've been trying to tell people this for a very long time.

But anyway, yeah, I I mean uh it's I guess it's surprising to them.

It's not surprising to me.

Yeah.

What did you think?

You think the EFF gives a fuck about this nebulous shit that leftists are crying about on the internet?

Malemma can give speeches and have his own view.

That's totally fine.

But he's not a crybaby on Twitter who's going to be receptive to this bullshit cancel culture nonsense.

Sorry, but.

It's just complete nonsense, alright?

I don't know what to say.

These people are probably going to um

Well

God help them in the coming weeks, that's all I could say.

That's all I could say on that matter, to be frank.

It is, uh, I'm I find it hard to like rub shit in people's face because it's like, okay, we win.

But we were supposed to win from the beginning.

But we win, okay.

It's good.

But is it a surprise?

Not necessarily.

I'm already seeing a lot of these people say, oh, the SACP is the way.

Yeah, go back to the fucking SAP.

Go back to cheerleading for the SACP.

That's way more up your alley.

The EFF.

They are considered very problematic by the South African Libtard elites, right?

Uh, you can go back to the SACP or the DA.

It's the same thing, to be honest, at the end of the day.

You guys, winning, you're gonna get used to winning.

There's a lot of winning coming our way, all right.

I just find it funny that a lot of people spent so long acting like the EFF is aligned with them and not us, um, over an issue that they neither we or they consider antagonistic or a primary contradiction.

And then they they basically like tried to make it seem l I mean, I saw the craziest things, you wouldn't believe it.

They were.

Oh, it was crazy.

I don't even want to talk about it.

What they were trying to do in terms of their propaganda, the Baisu, I mean, it's so funny.

But basically, guys, welcome to the fucking real world.

I guess you have to be in a cult to see just like what the real world is.

Because had we told them two weeks ago that the EFF fucks with us and likes us, they would have been like, you're just saying that because you're in a cult.

And like, look what happened.

I guess you have to be in a cult to just like know common sense and just see the truth.

But a lot of people, a lot of people are outraged and they're trying to message Malemma and the EFF to stop this from happening.

But like, why should the EFF give a fuck about them?

Like, what have you done to prove that your voice is worth anything?

Why should they listen to you?

Who are you?

Jackson has 3 million followers and he has become an internationally renowned voice against anti-imperialism.

Who the fuck are you?

You're a piss ant.

Nobody gives a fuck about your warnings and you're crying, you dumb bitch.

You're calling him a fascist.

We are calling you fascists.

And we have 3 million and you have nothing.

Fuck you.

You don't ever justify your accusations through reason or through evidence.

You're just resorting to your popularity.

Well, we are more popular than you, bitch.

So fuck you!

Cry babies.

The option to debate has always been there.

You don't want to debate and you just want to rely on the laurels of your popularity.

We are more popular than you.

Okay?

So don't count on it.

Social fascist scum.

Yeah, we're the cult, but we don't know if Jackson's the cult leader or Jeremiah Tahir is the cult leader.

I dress like one, so I'm the le cult leader.

ACP is basically like um you ever play those games until dawn for Sony where like it's constantly switching between like this main it's it's like um those games where it's like those story games where it's switching the characters.

Something happened in January where it went from Jackson to me 'cause Jackson's in Russia and I became the main character.

Um, which is fine, we alternate.

But um I'm the call leader now.

Maybe when he comes back to America he'll he'll be the cult leader again.

It depends.

I think uh the the the the EFF stuff When's Eddie's turn?

Ah, good question.

Interesting question.

Um, Eddie is not as hated as us two yet, but I don't think he sh he wants, I don't think it would be good if he was as hated.

It's up to him.

Anyway.

So, um

Yeah, dark Carlos.

Dark Carlos.

Oh, the day wai the day may come.

The day really may come.

For real.

That I could see that.

You know, like I could be s you know, there there could be something that happens where

It's a dark Carlos is gonna do some

Santeria shit.

Cult Santeria rituals.

Anything can happen.

Anyway, guys, um so yes, um

I actually had a a topic planned for tonight that I decided I wanted to talk about last night, but the EFF news that has taken Tweeter by storm has kind of overshadowed a lot of it.

Um

Also, the exposure of the anti-ACP cult.

Yikes, okay?

That Fido guy, I think I briefly alluded to it.

Fido actually owned a bookstore where he was selling, in his own words, CP, to children and was calling people prudes for finding that to be unacceptable and questionable and disgusting.

But that's not even the worst of it.

That's all I'm gonna say.

That's not even the worst of it.

And predictably, the head of the anti-ACP cult, which is full of literal miners, decided to respond to this clear smoking gun proof through the most weasly, disgusting form of deflection of just opening himself up to action to litigation.

I mean, to be fair, that's already happening.

Um to basically responding as a child would and saying no you.

Like, you can reach, you can try reaching as much as you want and say no you.

But we gave actual, like, smoking gun proof, okay?

In their own words, not the words we put in their mouth, their own words, all right?

Um yeah because I don't know I don't did Eddie interview Scott Ritter?

Yeah, Eddie interviewing Scott Ritter doesn't make Eddie

Uh uh someone who has committed the same level of crime that you have, okay?

By the way, even if you're right about this stupid logic of like if you've interviewed someone one time.

Or if in the past you streamed one time with someone.

Uh that makes you associated with them.

Well, the EFF is interviewing Jackson.

And that is happening.

So will you cancel the EFF 'cause everything you're accusing us, the EFF is now guilty for because they're interviewing Jackson.

And that's how it fucking works by your stupid logic.

You know, it's so stupid.

But it's smoking gun evidence, absolute smoking gun evidence.

And, you know, instead you what you should really do is take responsibility and own up to it.

Instead of this childish no you, like, that's so fucking stupid.

You just got exposed for something really fucked up.

Having a discord full of minors, mm I would say half are minors or more, you know?

Um, half or more, and they are grooming minors into this hate cult and exploiting their gullibility and their, you know, the fact that their brains aren't fully developed to use them as pawns.

It's really disgusting, it's really grooming, it's really fucking sickening.

All right, this whole deflection attempt of just saying no, you is just really fucking stupid.

I mean, everyone knows.

What our policy is in our Discord, if anyone's found out, they're banned immediately.

And by the way, on top of that, we don't even allow any inappropriate discussion.

Now, mods have to get there and ban the people when they see them.

So sometimes they can get away with it for 10 minutes, or I don't know.

I don't know, but.

There's no way to automate it all the time, but we absolutely crack down and ban on all this shit.

Some of their main lieutenants are minors in their cult.

You know, it's really fucked up.

You don't have anyone in our moderation, anyone who's a hero, anyone who's actually prominent.

Nothing.

No minors at all.

So, it's a really disgusting, sick thing going on.

And if you see the screenshots of the type of things they're discussing in there, it's not appropriate for minors to be engaging in these kinds of topics with adults, with strangers, you know?

So.

Uh again, it's it's really pathetic to see in response to this, instead of accountability, instead of apologizing, instead of deciding, you know what, this is messed up, maybe I should fix this problem.

Maybe

Instead of doing all that, they're just attempting literally to deflect.

Oh no, I didn't do anything, but you know you.

What the fuck?

I mean, it's smoking gun.

Anyone can look at those screenshots we shared.

Anyone can look at them.

Smoking gun, okay?

They are reaching so hard.

It's incredible.

It's profound, you know?

And and and you know what we need to do guys, hold people accountable.

Um, and and ask people: hey, do you approve of this?

Is this acceptable to you?

Will you condemn this?

Because uh it's too far involving minors.

It's really too far, you know.

Yeah, they're attempting to pull a reverse Uno by just opening what?

Opening yourself to defamation by lying and making things up.

Yeah, I mean, good luck, you know, in court, in a court of law, see how it's gonna hold up.

It's it's fucking incredible, you know?

It's really disgusting.

Well, that's the update on that front.

I don't want us to dwell too much on the negativity.

Because again, you should always never hate.

We're not here to hate.

We're not a hate cult.

We just are concerned.

And we have a right to be concerned.

So keep that in mind, that this is a hate cult that is grooming minors.

Because of course it makes sense.

Who is going to believe these crazy lies about us except actual children?

There's no reasonable adult I have ever spoken to in my entire life who buys into any of the crap they say about us.

I've talked to Daniel Tutt in private many times and he could never, ever, ever, ever be pressed to admit that he believes any of that crap is real.

I've talked to all sorts of people in private about it.

None of them believe in any of this bullshit.

It's only minors and in particular mentally disabled Autistic Minister who are being roped into this hate cult, believing in this clear just nonsense.

It's not even plausible.

I mean, if you just scrutinize it a little bit, it makes no sense.

It's completely implausible.

It's not even logically consistent.

The things that they say.

About us make no sense, literally no sense, no coherence.

You have to actually be a child to believe it, for real.

Um, well, I met Daniel Tut in person.

I'm not just saying in public in person, he was very clear about his true beliefs.

Um

He knows we're being targeted by feds.

Like, he knows it.

He's well, he's not stupid.

There's, you have to be stupid to not see what's going on.

Everyone can see it, okay?

Um, so we're concerned about that.

I don't want to dwell on it because uh, it's not going to be handled on stream.

In any case.

I want to talk about something that I got to thinking about yesterday, which is actually on the topic of fascism.

Because I was on YouTube right before I went to bed and I saw this British documentary on the rise of Nazi Germany and the early years and the 30s of Hitler.

And I was just curious about what they were going to say and how they were going to even make sense of that.

But this liberal British, whatever.

So I clicked it and I was skipping through it and watching it.

And

It is kind of a quagmire to think about the contradictions of how the bourgeois liberals are fascinated with fascism and how bourgeois consciousness articulates fascism.

In versus communism, for example.

And it really got me to and I wanted to share these thoughts with you.

Because I think it's so relevant.

Because with Kanye and with X promoting Hitlerism and lionizing Hitler and making Hitler seem like he's so cool, and it's you could see with this British liberal documentary, that same level of like fascination with Hitler is there, even among these ostensibly anti-fascist liberals.

I mean, they have a same degree of fascination.

Like, wow, this is a really like.

I want to kind of get to the core of it and think about how Nazism was a counter-revolution against Bolshevik, and how the Western mind has made sense of that from liberalism to now the kind of new Zumer neo-Nazism we're seeing, right?

And, you know, what struck me the most about that documentary was how much of an emphasis they would place on the fact that under Nazi Germany, individuals were seen as part of a collective.

And every Sunday, instead of having family dinners, they would go to great mess halls.

And they would all be collective.

And there was a great feeling of solidarity.

And it was like everyone was a part of something.

And the individual was suppressed.

And instead, it was the collect.

You know.

And I was thinking to myself this whole time, I was like

But but Nazism was extremely tame when it came to collectivism in comparison to communism, right?

If that is horrifying and fascinating you liberals, I wonder how you would fucking feel about what they were doing in the Soviet Union, you know?

Because they were trying to like, oh, you know, children were being indoctrinated with political ideology and singing.

And I was just like.

This is why when right wingers try to say that communism is worse than um Nazism, they oftentimes get away with it.

Because by the logic of how liberals are receiving Hitlerism,

They

Um they are setting up communism to be worse.

And you know, it's fucking crazy to me because it's like

Um

The Liberals seem to be

Fascinated with this with the notion of social change in general.

Like the fact that there was a s so-called totalitarian societal transformation, which there wasn't under Nazism, but the aesthetics of one were definitely there.

The appearance of one, I should rather say.

And liberals, for some strange reason,

They cannot even process what happened with the Bolshevik Revolution, which was much more radical, much more transformative when it came to society.

I mean, they they it's it's literally like a Kantian thing.

It's like a it's an unnameable, incom totally incomprehensible outside that is beyond the threshold of their ability to rationally comprehend.

And what I find disturbing about

American consciousness, to be frank, is that it seems like

For them, there's a spectrum of totalitarianism.

And the first introduction they seem to have to totalitarian collectivism is Nazism.

And there was always this peculiar, strange thing, even in the 30s in America, where the American mind would lump in fascism with Soviet communism.

Oh, that's just this weird partisan collectivism.

And

It is so important that we be mindful.

Of how dangerous this pipeline is, where

It's much easier for people

Who come from an ordinary kind of consciousness, when they get radicalized, to go straight to Nazism.

Rather than uh Marxism or Communism.

It's much easier.

And that's because it's very strange.

I think this is how I kind of try to explain it, you know?

It is thi this puzzle is the one we need to solve to win in the West.

Not in the East, in the West.

To win in the West, we have to crack this code of how to.

Solve this problem, you know?

Because this is exactly what it was.

Weimar Germany was already on a trajectory to the dominance of socialism or the workers' movement by default.

By default, right?

And there was Bolshevism to the east, and it was exerting tremendous pressure societally.

But the right-wing reaction was such.

that there was a filter.

Bolshevism became an object of fascination and terror, terror.

What happened in Russia in their revolution was not it was not um beyond the threshold of comprehension for the majority of Russian peasants who already lived communal village ways of life.

Um

Now in the cities there was something there were that was the the breakdown of the traditional feudal relations.

I mean that was already in and of itself a huge transformation.

What ended up happening in Russia is they kicked out all the aristocrats and nobles and the capitalists.

They just kicked them out.

They kicked them, they swept them, they kicked them out and the people were left to build a a state and a civilization.

Not necessarily from scratch, but um

But uh but definitely one that um was the dictatorship of the exploited, the the masses, the people, the majority, right?

A popular state.

And um

In Germany,

There was this way the right and the reaction would depict Bolshevism, not as we're gonna kick out the elites and the ruling class and just take the reins of power and just steer the ship ourselves, but more along the lines that this nefarious Bolshevik force and plot is going to violently uproot everyone at the most fundamental level of life.

And lead to bloody terror and it's just the same, the fear-mongering of the French Revolution.

It's similar, right?

And um

There was this established bourgeois society in Germany,

Which did not know how to comprehend that this ultimate object of fear, which was Bolshevism.

Just sheer terror.

99% of German anti-Semitism I don't know if 99%, a huge portion, was a traumatic response to Bolshevism and the way they could cope with Bolshevism is by blaming it on the Jews.

Because at least the Germans knew Jews.

At least Jews were somewhat familiar to them.

Bolshevism was like this extremely alien thing from the East that was totally incomprehensible to their mind.

So one of the ways they coped with that trauma is by giving it a Jewish face.

That made it more familiar at least.

No less terrifying and whatever.

But at least a little more familiar and a l at least it's an enemy we can defeat and so on and so on.

For them, you know.

And, um, uh so uh they um

People need to understand something.

There was nothing interesting about the collectivism under Nazism.

That was rather seamless for the majority of Germans.

That was stolen from social democratic traditions that were not alien, that were not these.

Radical changes or anything, those were compromises.

Um

Made

in order to uh uh allow the regime

To uh how should I say

Avoid being immediately overthrown by the workers, right?

They smashed the labor unions, they jailed them, they beat them through t terror, you know, and and violence.

Um they crushed any semblance of workers' power.

And I remember this fucking documentary was like, oh, and Hitler, he built the Autobahn and shit.

And I was like, but the Autobahn was a thing from Weimer Germany.

You know, so the real essence of Nazism is not what these British liberals are trying to say it was.

Oh, collective solidarity and all this kind of stuff.

That was seamless.

The majority of German workers were not individualists.

They're working in factories.

They're living in communal settings.

That is not something fascinating.

It's not something big and profound or something.

Only for the bourgeoisie, that's the case.

You need to understand that.

That's the bourgeois perspective, that's not the workers' perspective.

And I tried to think what really then is the essence of Nazism?

What made Nazism a new thing that was distinct?

And the truth is

Nazism

Um

The real evil of Nazism, in my view,

Was that it was this intrusive um

It was this intrusive uh kind of

Psychosis

where there was no fundamental changes at the level of ownership.

There were no fundamental changes at the level of the underlying logic of production.

There were no fundamental changes at the level of the organization of society or even

Sovereign political power.

Germany was never really a democracy.

Um.

The real thing was it was this reign of terror, counter uh counter revolutionary terror.

And the principal thing was the intrusiveness, the the constant state of

LARP, so to speak.

It was a a constant and uninterrupted state of excitation, subjective excitation, right?

Where

Intrusive symbolism and slogans and shouting, it's constantly happening unendingly, right?

And

That is s that is portrayed in the fascist ideology as somehow revolutionary.

Yeah, kind of like forced LARP, you know?

Forced performativism, that's the most thing that c you could characterize it by.

And um

The the terrifying thing I think, which r r really makes it evil and sick.

is that the the justifying derangement of the Nazis was always, but at least we are not like the Bolsheviks.

Notice how dangerous this is.

If you can depict Bolshevism as this

Terrifying sublime, even beyond the threshold of civilization, where it's just pure depravity and pure totalitarian collectivism or whatever, whatever they were depicting it as, right?

The Nazis perversely they really did engage in a perverse perversity of um

Totalitarian uh

Intrusive ideologi, I mean, invading invading people's privacy, not allowing them to breathe.

And so on and so on, because they were like, well,

This is necessary to stop Bolshevism.

To stop Bolshevism, we have to um

we have to in in some ways mimic it.

But the mimicking was much more evil than the original thing.

It's like a a dark, twisted, perverse way

Of, put it this way: let's say you're depicting the Bolsheviks as the devil, right?

What the Nazis did is they said, Okay, that's a devil.

We can act like devils a little bit because at least we're not like the big devil, we can be kind of small devils.

At least we won't be the big, scary one, right?

Meanwhile, the Bolshevik caricature in their head was a complete construction of their own mind, their own sickness within, right?

So, you know, there is um the the thing that that that was really characteristic of Nazism was the constant ta state of subjective excitation and

This um

This this actual destruction of civil society and privacy, ironically.

Which was perversion on a mass scale.

Children in their families, homes, um

Swastikas everywhere and shit, a very alien, strange, bizarre symbol.

Um, it was like imagine if it was pornography, it's the same thing, it's the same level of perversion, of just lack of respect for basic dignity and privacy.

And if you want to understand the difference between communism and Nazism, I think that if you look at footage from any communist state,

One thing you'll notice is that there is civil society authentically in the strict sense.

I'm not talking about liberals, civil society, and NGOs.

I'm talking about people can just chill and relax.

There's an element of serenity, of contemplation, not individual contemplation like free thinking.

I'm not talking about that.

I'm talking that people were given the ability to breathe in their villages, in their homes.

They weren't in a constant state of ideological excitation.

Sometimes they're just standing around in their dachas or their you know, apartments, their whatever, and they're just chilling.

I mean, it's not always constant agitation, precisely.

And that is very authentic.

That's a very authentic thing.

You know?

Because they were allowed to be human.

They were allowed to actually carve out an existence that was not entirely defined by ideology.

but could just be spo uh authentic, real, authentic existence in the Soviet Union and other Communist states.

But when you look at footage from Nazi Germany, everyone is constantly on meth.

Like all the time.

There's not a single fucking moment where they're turning it off.

And they're they're ceasing to perform in this footage.

They are always on meth.

I thought about the difference of communism and um Nazism in terms of like the feelings it conjures.

And this is I'm gonna I'm gonna give you the feeling.

Like Hitler's Germany.

This is the vibe.

Right?

And then Stalin's Soviet Union.

This is the vibe.

There's a profound difference between these two vibes.

I'm going to explain them.

In the Stalinist society, so to speak.

There is an element

Of the recognition of an indecisiveness and risk.

In the real, like you're building a grand factory, right?

You have a plan, you have the blueprints.

You're building the courage to do, but you're bracing the real, you know?

You're risking yourself.

You're not acting like a god who's already done being built.

You have to build.

You have to face a challenge.

You may fail in that challenge.

It's not guaranteed.

So there there is this risk you have to take, you know?

There's this type of risk you have to take.

And there is a serenity there where

you understood that this not not necessarily there is a time line in which this wouldn't have hap had happened.

Meaning it is possible that this may not happen.

It is possible that, um

That

Well there is a multiplicity of possibilities.

And you are bracing the challenge of

Realizing one.

you know.

But there is always a serene, sober and wise acknowledgment of that multiplicity of possibility.

You know.

Bolshevism very much

did not always need to be in a in an excited subjective state.

In order to be a confident outlook.

Bolshevism

You can be in an excited state, an enthusiastic state.

You could also even have doubts and be you can have that.

You can have um a relaxed state, a calm state, a serene and wise, far reaching, far seeing state.

But you really have a sense of the objective, the objective.

That is the fundamental distinction in terms of the aesthetic.

When I say aesthetic, I don't mean cosmetic.

I mean the fundamental sensibility of human existence.

A sense of the objective.

A reverence and respect and humility before the objective.

And in Nazism, that was the precise opposite.

In Nazism there was no sensibility of the objective.

It's just a pure subjectivism and pure subjective enthusiasm without any regard

So in in in the Nazi um mobilization

There is no possibility, there is no serenity, there is no kind of acquiescence and acknowledgement of the fact that.

There is an element of indecisiveness and and you must be called upon to meet a challenge, and it's a real challenge.

Nazism has the hubris of invincibility, that there are no challenges, that it's already uh overcome everything, and it's literally you're on meth, you're just in this hyper excited state all the fucking time.

And that's not authentic.

It's not authentic because it doesn't encompass the full range of human sensibility and the human aesthetic, so to speak.

Communist totalitarianism was an effective reality even when people were chilling and were calm and were not thinking about ideology.

But Nazism was humiliated by this element of authentic material civil society.

You had to constantly be thinking about Adolf Hitler and the Führer, and the minute

You're not.

It's an embarrassment, you have to cover it up, you know?

And there's no ability to just chill and just like, okay, objectively we're on the right path.

It doesn't depend entirely upon my subjective feeling because there's an element of objectivity there.

The decisi I'll tell you, the decisiveness in Bolshevism is not a decisiveness of mustering up a subjective sensibility.

It's a decisiveness of of properly acquiescing to material and objective necessity.

The aesthetic of Bolshevism again, aesthetic doesn't mean cosmetic, it's a sensibility.

The sensibility of Bolshevism is such.

It's like a a a reverence

Of steel, right?

Steel must be tempered.

Steel is not automatically steel, it needs to be tempered.

But will, true will, precisely consists in how the steel is tempered.

Nazism

is the opposite.

For Nazism, will is about liquefying steel and turning it into air, turning it into the whims and fancies of the subjective, um pure subjective spirit.

overcoming all barriers, m you know, uh uh conquering, enslaving, destroying all whatever barriers that get uh you know, it's a completely different thing.

Um

The Bolshevik sensibility is about giving way

to what is solid, you know, what is um what is concrete.

Bolsheviks look upon the mountain they revere the strength and mightiness of the mountain.

The Nazis look upon nothing.

They're blind.

They're just perverts who are trying to affect a desire.

And an an uh uh uh uh ideology that in no way has to justify itself before material reality.

So that is a fundamental difference, which is very difficult because the tricky thing is the way Nazism tried to steal and appropriate and mi r turn into a perverse mockery of uh Bolshevism.

And the social democratic tradition in general.

It was like a disgusting B D S M perverse twisting and subversion.

they partook in, which turned it into the opposite of what it actually meant.

But you want to know what I find fascinating is that the Communist rejection of fascism.

has nothing really in common with the bourgeois liberal one.

The bourgeois liberal one is much more focused on the horror and terror of what appears to be a grand social transformation.

But communists

Do not have that fear.

And what liberals look, I I wish there was a smarter way I could put this.

What liberals fail to understand about fascism

Is that the very same evil that they perceive in fascism is not a projection.

It's something the Nazis themselves self-consciously

We're aware of and we're doing purposefully.

Whereas when liberals project evil upon communist states, that is really just projection.

And why is that distinction important?

Because liberal um

Liberal depictions of fascism

Um

Failed to comprehend that the Nazis were also liberals who were reacting to communism, right?

And they were just enacting all of the evil and filth, some of the evil and filth, let's say, that they projected on the Bolsheviks, the Jewish Bolsheviks, right?

They said the Bolsheviks are doing all this, so in response and in retaliation, we should be able to do this twisted evil shit.

But what they were accusing the Bolsheviks of was complete fucking bullshit, you know?

But it was you see, they projected filth on the Bolsheviks, and then through this projection, they gave themselves the green light to partake in a lot of wickedness and evil.

And then liberals see that evil from the Nazis.

And

Somehow it turns into a form of anti-communism.

You see?

It's like Nazis are holding up a warped mirror in front of communism and enacting that.

Liberals are looking at that and what do you know, communism gets blamed for all the evil of Nazism.

When the Nazis themselves were self-consciously trying to be an uh an evil, subversive caricature of the Bolsheviks.

Isn't that fascinating?

Isn't it fascinating how that is why

Hitler

Is someone so easy to lionize among um uneducated and politically immature people?

who are angry at the system and want radical change.

He is the caricature.

He is the cosmetic performance.

Everyone needs to understand something.

Um Nazism.

Had all of this great pageantry, all of these marches not great in the sense of it looked good, but this grand pageantry, grand aesthetics, grand uh performance, grand simulation and performance of a profound change happening, all to alleviate pressure

That was a consequence of precisely nothing changes.

Nothing changing, really.

Instead of having basic fucking nationalized health care.

They did this incredible performative theatrics, and Hitler didn't nationalize a single fucking company in that country.

Not a single industry.

Nothing was nationalized.

Nothing was actually owned by the sovereign country.

Not even the banks.

And yet there's this theatrix of grand change and collective solidarity going on to precisely cover up the fact as a way of um

really demoralizing the workers, if anything.

Nothing happening.

Really nothing.

Besides, of course, the violence and the terror and stuff.

And it was the whole thing was just rearmament.

The whole economy was based on weapons manufacturing.

The whole fucking thing.

You know how these Nazis say that Hitler was giving people jobs?

All the jobs were weapons manufacturing.

All of them.

It was all based on that.

The Autobahn, again, the Autobahn was a project that began in Weimar, Germany.

The whole plan for an Autobahn was in Weimar, Germany.

Nothing about the Nazis.

It was nothing unique.

The main thing they did is rearmament.

You know?

And people need to there's two traps you need to avoid, okay?

One, you need to avoid the bourgeois liberal false anti-fascism.

Because that is also anti-communism.

When I watched that documentary last night just to see, I was like, oh my god, if they said this shit about the USSR, it would be way worse.

What they're trying to say.

Oh, yeah, um, people ate together in collective mess halls, or oh, how scary, you know.

Wait until they find out about the USSR.

So you need to avoid that trap.

You need to avoid bourgeois liberal liberalism.

when it comes to how you confidently confront fascist ideology.

Because the biggest friends of the resurgent neo-fascists are the liberals.

And I'll tell you the neoliberals.

I'll tell you why.

Because the way in which neoliberals attack fascism is all they do is attack the superficial aspects of fascism that appeal to um to the common people, right?

Uh collectivism, uh a strong, powerful state, uh, you know, uh willingness to get things done, I guess, uh, when it comes to um

Public works, or I don't know.

But what liberals will never criticize about fascism is the the evil of the subjectivism, the subjective enthusiasm, you know, the twisted and perverted w because you wanna know why?

Because fascism and Nazism, the closest thing we've gotten to it so far, I'll say it, it's literally the woke shit.

The intrusive way it's just like being nothing's changing at the level of the relations of production or or the property relations, and yet at every level of life, they're just like constantly pushing this like intrusive, hyperactive, like you're on meth, you have to constantly fucking engage in this performative ideology.

That actually has a lot in common with how Nazism was experienced.

Forget the con oh, well, in this case, the content is social justice.

Sure, but the form is very similar in terms of the real underlying reality of it, you know.

Um

You just can't even breathe.

There's no authenticity at all.

So, um.

That's just true.

Look in Ukraine.

The Azov, it's not a huge leap to go from Libtard and Azov in Ukraine, you know?

Um

Yeah, Bolshevism, the problem with Bolshevism, the reason it does it's not as taboo and banned as Nazism, is because it's too banal and too mundane.

But in actual reality, despite the fact that communism doesn't fascinate liberals as much as Nazism does, the way they react to Bolshevism is way more aggressive.

That's the thing.

Liberals may not react to the this is the thing.

Liberals don't react to the imagery of communism with as much hostility as they do to the imagery of communism, right?

When a liberal sees a swastika, they're very whatever.

When they see a hammer and sickle, it's not as offensive to them.

But that's just about images.

When it comes to reality, liberals react much more aggressively and with much more hostility to real communist phenomena and states and societies.

In comparison, liberals are much more conciliatory toward Nazism and fascism as a phenomenon.

Compare the way liberals accuse China of carrying out an Uyghur genocide and all these things, but they're fine with Azov Nazis in Ukraine, you know?

So, you need to understand that it's not that Nazism is more dangerous to the system, it's that it tempts liberals too much, such that it is censored to some extent, not anymore on X, and it is.

In terms of its images, more taboo.

But in terms of its reality, it's not more taboo.

It's far from it.

It's much more acceptable in terms of its reality to liberals.

You know?

And um Kanye is a Nazi for the same reason he likes porn.

Okay, it's the same thing.

Anyway, um

Same exact thing, okay, no difference.

Um

So these are things I was thinking about.

Like um

Hmm.

Do not fall into the liberal temptation.

Of assuming that the problem of fascism was just the fact that there was collective collectivism, okay?

Because they apply that same thing against communism.

Understand the distinct evil of fascism.

And to understand that distinct evil, you have to be a communist.

You cannot be a liberal and be a real anti-fascist.

You can kind of, you can be a principled, like in the 30s, there were principled liberals who opposed fascism, of course.

But today, what liberal means is quite different.

It's the neoliberal hegemony bullshit ideologist, right?

There's no anti-fascism from neoliberal ideology.

It's not possible.

Um these British documentaries

They are enabling fascism and they are simultaneously a source of extreme anti-communism.

Because the first thing someone sees who's angry at the system, who watches those documentaries, is A, if this is bad, then communism must have been way worse, and B, you know what, in comparison to the status quo, this doesn't seem so bad.

So it's no wonder that, given the way the hegemony

has uh performatively engaged in anti-fascism, they've ended up actually tempting people into fascist ideology at the expense of communism.

Yeah, same documentaries are always clutching pearls about uh Soviets uh during and after World War II.

You're so correct, it's very true.

I want you guys to be real effective.

Ah, fuck, Volk, you you

I fucking forgot about Confront the Chairman.

Fuck.

Okay, we're gonna do it Sunday.

We're gonna do confront the chairman Sunday.

Because I forgot tonight.

It's not happening tonight.

Totally forgot.

So we'll do it Sunday.

But um

We need to be real anti-fascists.

Real anti-fascism has nothing in common with those British documentaries.

Nothing.

I mean, I was watching that documentary and I was going.

These guys are retarded.

I mean

You could tell how hard they were trying not to like how hard they had to try to convince themselves to to regard Nazi Germany as bad.

You know what sickens me to my core guys?

What sickens to me to my core about these documentaries is how they truly, truly tried to convince us.

That Hitler was universally popular and universally beloved by everyone.

Even though the Nazis never won an election,

And even though they had to beat the shit out of an attack, all the trade unions, all the they beat them violently.

They would you get taken away.

And I understand h he had popularity.

But the way they depict it is is as if there was no contradictions at all within German society.

And you know what I fucking hate about that documentary?

They make it seem like there were no contradictions, class contradictions, in the Nazi German society, and that the only contradiction, in fact,

was between people's moral conscience

and their temptations to have the sense of colle they're like, well, you have this collective belonging and and and and the satisfaction of these basic human needs to be together wi you know.

But you're doing s but but you you but in doing so you've lost your individual moral conscience and you've turned into a monster.

Therefore every collective existence is a monstrosity.

And it sickens me because there were contradictions in German society, and those contradictions explain Nazi militarism.

Because it was in order to alleviate the class pressure internally that they had to go outward.

Does anyone seriously fucking believe that Lebensraum was real?

Let me ask you guys that.

Do you think Leben's Rom was real?

In terms of it being a real need?

Like Lebensraum was a real policy, but do you think it was a real need?

Do you really think Germany needed living space?

If j you don't think there was enough land in Germany?

Yes, there was.

But there wasn't enough land and space

To accommodate both the monopolists who fucking hoarded a shit ton.

Right?

And common people.

who needed it.

So instead of redistributing it,

They wanted to enslave and and and and annex and conquer other people, and that was because of an internal class pressure.

Absolutely.

So many people were hung because of Nazism.

Uh so many people were y th this history.

I n every time I watch these fucking documentaries, all they're doing is talking about how all the the danger of of populism and and and people losing their moral conscience.

As if it just people it as if it just happened because uh we weren't being ruled over by enough glasses wearers, you know?

Like do you really think when Hitler was talking about Lebensraum, that he w that that was real in terms of like they needed space?

Oh, we just if Germany needed space, why doesn't Germany today need space?

What am I mistaken about, Crunchy?

What am I mistaken about?

Go ahead.

It happened because there were glasses wear yeah that's what I'm saying.

That's absolutely what I'm saying.

The biggest enabling factor in the rise of fascism

Is in fact

Uh liberalism.

Absolutely.

Absolutely, always was.

I like glasses, I can't see without them.

Listen.

But you know what we mean by it, so that's it, you know.

Why is it that academics wear glasses more?

Why is that actually?

Why is it that like um why why is that?

Why is it that intelligentsia tend to wear glasses more?

I don't even know why that is.

Don't worry about it for now.

You know who you should worry about it?

The people who wear it as an aesthetic.

If you wear it as an aesthetic.

I can't say what's gonna happen, but uh it's not gonna be good.

Glasses but without the lens.

Disgusting.

Guys, how is the campaign to stop the appearance from happening?

How's the campaign to stop

Jackson's appearance going

What do you think?

How's it going?

They're really trying hard, they they said let's contact Julius Milema.

They got they even got these um alt media people to join in.

Everyone, they're all trying to stop the EFF from from making this happen.

Uh, how is that going?

This was just released 20 minutes, 10 minutes ago.

This was 10 minutes ago, all right.

Commander-in-Chief Malema, who stood steadfast with the Palestinian resistance and called for even arming South Africa to arm the Palestinian resistance, is really incredible.

It is extremely hypocritical.

And what it comes down to is it's not about Julius Malema being a criminal, and he's not.

What Julius Malema is guilty of, he is guilty of something.

Julius Malema is guilty of trying to destroy the apartheid economic system that still presides over South Africa today because apartheid may have politically ended, but the economic system still remains.

And that is what Julius Malema is fighting against.

He's fighting against the big banks.

You know how stupid you look calling Jackson a.

Do you think this guy is stupid who's interviewing him?

He heard him himself what he said.

All these people in the comments, oh, don't bring Jackson, he's this, he's that.

The guy's thinking, hey, I talked to him, it's fine.

What are you talking about?

This is what's wrong with what he's saying?

You know, you think you're going to trick him?

It may work in these minors and these discords.

It's not going to work on an adult freedom fighter, South Africa.

He's fighting against Zionist interests, he's fighting against the monopolies that are controlled by Western institutions that are enslaving the South African people, and that is what really gets under Elon Musk's skin, and that is the only crime he is guilty of committing, and for that I consider him a hero.

It's just uh I don't want these people I don't want anyone to engage in self-harm.

I don't know what's gonna happen, all right?

I don't know how they're gonna handle this shit.

It's gonna be really bad.

I hope everyone is just takes a break from the internet who's freaking out about this 'cause I don't I'm worried about how they're gonna react, to be honest.

I'm super worried about that.

Imagine spending the entire day trying to stop this from happening.

Imagine spending the entire day trying to stop it from happening, and it already can I spoil it?

It already happened, fucking idiots.

The interview had happened before.

I didn't want to spoil it.

I wanted it to be a surprise, but it was just spoiled, I guess.

The interview happened yesterday, okay?

The interview literally happened yesterday, all right?

It's not.

It was pre-recorded.

It's not like you can't stop something that already fucking happened, right?

Oh, Jackson told you in Discord.

I was trying to wait to reveal it.

I was gonna wait till they release it to just tell to you know, hey guys, it turns out you couldn't have even stopped it because it was pre-re you wasted all that.

I let them waste all that time contacting and emailing the EFF.

Because it was funny.

Because like they didn't realize it was already done.

Oh, man.

Oh, man.

It's just very sad for our enemies.

What can I say?

Margaret Kimberly

you should have no affiliation with this person.

You know what, Margaret, nobody gives a fuck.

But she does follow me, which is so weird.

Why does she follow me?

Margaret literally follows me, right?

Honestly, you guys are kind of funny sometimes.

Sometimes you guys are kind of

Sometimes you guys are a little funny.

I'm not gonna lie.

Like, for this, this specific interaction right here is a little funny.

Debay Hinkle Now!

All calves again, coward?

Yeah.

Oh my god, bro.

What is this?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Alright, this is another bizarre thing.

I'm gonna show that one.

I'm not gonna I'm not gonna show that one.

Mm-hmm.

What the fuck is this?

Alright, this is the most schizo one I've seen so far.

This is the most schizo one.

Julius is an agent of the British.

Working with Lord Robin to knock out Briggs Jackson.

You what?

Who what is this?

This is the most str this is like the biggest curve ball in this enti this is like a LaRouche is joining with all these leftists to cancel and j What's even going on anymore?

Yeah, this gu I think this guy's

Their location says Gay British Possession Canada.

is what their location says.

It's gay British

What is this?

What is this?

La Russite brain rot.

LaRouche brain rot.

Oh, God.

Volk replied to this?

No, he didn't.

Quiet Gorilla replied.

Okay.

Oh yeah, thi this one bulk uh also wrote a reply, very concerned.

Urgent.

Potential consequences of Jackson's

Dear EFF team, I hope this message finds you well.

I'm rising to raise a significant concern regarding any potential involvement of Jackson on the upcoming podcast.

Allow me to explain how this would be a deeply problematic decision.

Jackson's participation.

Can be seen as a direct assault on the non-neurotypical barist bar barista tariat the non-neurotypical baristatariat and mentally unstable Western left.

This group whose approval and support online are crucial for the EFF's legitimacy.

would likely view any association with Jackson

as a betrayal of the values they hold dear.

In turn, this could result in severe backlash and potentially place the EFF on their watch list, which would jeopardize our standing with this community.

It's important to consider that the Western left maintain significant online influence, and without their endorsement, gaining broader legitimacy and recognition in the current political landscape would be extremely difficult for the EFF.

In short, distancing ourselves from Jackson is not just a matter of principle, but of strategic necessity.

Please let me know if there's any further clarification needed on this matter.

Oh my god.

Oh my god.

This is unbelievable.

Yeah.

The barista chariot.

This is what they think, this is actually what they think.

They actually think that this would happen.

That's what they're projecting on Mo.

Like, they actually think this.

Oh, people from South Africa are probably so confused seeing this shit.

Anyway, again, like, they don't really it's not like a big deal where they're gonna like

They don't really fucking care, dude, like about it that much to where they're not even gonna interview someone for not having the exact same view.

Such a niche issue that's like not the most important thing in the fucking world.

Yeah.

Uh I love this.

This is nice.

This should be proof that DSA and other left wing organizations need to get themselves together.

How are they being outflanked by the ACP?

I wonder how.

I like how the EFF was getting like spammed a shit ton.

And all they did, this is what they did.

They just posted this as their next post.

And then they posted a second time, which was just a sneak preview.

Don't miss it.

They're not even gonna fucking acknowledge.

These people crying, bro.

What did you think would happen?

Like, what did you think?

You think they're going to, like, oh no, you're right.

What do you think?

They're not even acknowledging it.

Don't miss it.

Full steam ahead.

The full episode is out.

I didn't know that.

Oh, it's out!

Yeah, it's out.

Oh, in two hours, it's out in two hours.

Two hours.

Wow, William Jennings with the 14.

Unbelievable.

Wow.

Thank you, brother.

I appreciate it a lot.

Wow

Alright guys.

Anyway, I I uh just wanted to talk to you about that documentary.

I s I didn't watch all of it, I just some of it inspired some thoughts because I was just trying to think about like how do people get exposed to ideas politically, alternative ideas.

Lennon Dubois, what's up?

And uh I I I think we need to learn that.

And we need to learn how to

Make communism more lucrative to people and more interesting.

uh than how liberalism programs them to be interested in Nazism and fascism and Hitlerism.

You know?

So that's what we need to do.

We need to we need to actually introduce people to

The fact that communism is a very strong, powerful historical force.

Which has not been given its proper recognition.

Project though this is what it's really it's about recognition.

Communism has not been given proper recognition, you know, that it deserves.

And that's what it all boils down to, really, you know.

But anyway, guys.

Do you

What?

I didn't say anything.

I didn't say anything.

I didn't say anything.

MV, what's up with the five?

What's going on?

Strella Stani, what's up bro?

How you doing?

Alright.

All right.

Alright guys, um

You know what I have to say?

Confront the chairman has got to be Sunday.

It's way too late.

I forgot about it today.

So we'll do it Sunday.

All right.

But what I have to say is, um

Did you think about me?

I don't think just win.

Girl, I want you, I guarantee you.

Spend my life.

The most over my traps and you waited out in the end.

I should've known you were just a hard click.

I'ma call you Medusa, cause you was just a snake.