Communist Views on Gender Relations

[Music]

thank you

[Applause]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Applause]

what's wrong

foreign

[Music]

somewhere

[Music]

[Music]

is

true

[Music]

two three

[Music]

two four

[Music]

five five

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

[Applause]

foreign

[Applause]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

I'll Flash

[Music]

today

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

is

[Music]

let it fall apart

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

two three

[Music]

two

[Music]

[Music]

four five

two three

[Music]

two three

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Applause]

[Music]

[Music]

it was

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

yourself

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Applause]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

into today

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

three two

[Music]

times

[Music]

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

[Applause]

foreign

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

please

[Music]

[Music]

get it right

[Music]

into two three

[Music]

[Music]

thank you

Emilio thank you so much for the 10

gifted memberships how's everybody doing

today just kidding I don't give a

wanna know why I'm late wanna know why

I'm late I mean let me adjust something

he's just something

I have a lot of explaining to do oh boy

all right well I'll explain

I'll explain

explaining I have to do is the fact that

I didn't stream yesterday reason I

didn't stream yesterday was because I

was caught up working on my sub stack I

was also

doing other talking to stuff I was just

overall in any general

why the is this mic not working

consistently I don't get it

right I need to get a new mic

uh it's not really big my voice

what the is

hey

hello hello

okay yeah I don't know what the is

wrong with this

piece of Mike

um

for now

is it good now is it good now

you know

hello

hello

hello

my name is Hakeem

all right are we good

sake all right I think you should

be good now

should be good now

gain is too low

it's too loud now I'm Gonna Keep it this

way I'm Gonna Keep it this way uh the

mic is not picking up my voice

you know what hello

should pick pick up like this right

hello can you hear me now yeah you can

hear me now everything's good okay so

ladies and gentlemen

all right we're just gonna do go with

this okay

um

I actually have a serious topic for

today and uh Destiny's crack two who

should thank so much for the 20.

appreciate you man holy thank you

appreciate you

we actually have somewhat of a serious

topic today uh it's not gonna be that

much of a comedic stream and uh the

reason I don't want to make this too

much of a comedic stream is that every

time I really talk about gender issues

and gender relations thank you so much

Dusty spratfield appreciate you

every time I talk about gender issues

and gender relations in general

I tend to notice a pattern and that

pattern happens to be that I just

fundamentally don't take it seriously

when I talk about it but the reason I

don't really take it seriously whenever

I talk about it and the reason I'm

always trolling and I'm always memeing

about it is because I'm committed to the

view that it is fundamentally impossible

to establish any universal

you know

judgment on

gender right

when you belong to one of the Sexes so

what I mean by that is that

when I talk about women I'm going to be

talking about women as a man you're not

going to get a complete picture of what

a woman is just by listening to what a

man has to say I don't feel like it's my

responsibility to account for what

femininity is I just don't feel like

that's my responsibility

I I find it absurd that there are these

male feminists out here that think that

all women belong to their Harem and that

they somehow can speak for all women and

then oh yeah are you a woman did you

know that I'm for women's rights I just

find that really weird

well it's not only weird I just find it

inauthentic most importantly I find it

inauthentic I find it inauthentic when

people

can decide that they have accounted for

the woman's question in the sense that

you're going to be able to deduce things

about every woman you meet based on some

kind of like political or ideological

General view on women so that's really

why I don't really take it seriously

whenever I talk about it and then

furthermore I also disagree with the

view that your personal attitude when it

comes to gender relations in terms of

your personal interaction with women

should in any way have to reflect

directly at least uh whatever theory of

gender relations you have so for example

I think I believe in hypocrisy I think

someone should be extremely sexist

when it comes to their personal

relationships but still believe you know

you know on a broader societal level I

mean should women be allowed to have the

same jobs that men should yeah should

they re should I mean I joke about it a

lot I do joke about it a lot

but should women be allowed to vote

I mean yeah come on let's be mature like

being serious yeah they should be right

being serious technically speaking women

should have the right to be able to do

anything a man should and the reason I

have to emphasize this and stress this

and and just to be clear to people when

I'm joking when I'm not joking is

because when it comes to building a

Communist Party

you are going to be dealing with women

and in the capacity in Your Capacity as

communists women

should not be treated differently as men

in a Communist party or in any formal

organization so I fully reject the view

that women should be treated differently

from Men

on any legal political organizational or

even social level

but I fundamentally believe men and

women should be treated differently on a

personal level right on a personal level

of course men and women should be

treated differently but on a

organizational level on a political

level on a formal level of course you

shouldn't take into account someone's

gender

just like you shouldn't take into

account any any other of the immutable

characteristics of women

sorry immutable characteristics of human

beings it's just not fundamentally

relevant right it's not relevant it's

not a relevant matter when it comes to

the business of political work and being

a communist

so we are this is going to be a

difficult stream to follow because a lot

of it's going to appear contradictory

um and also we're dealing with a crisis

that has to be addressed and the crisis

is the fact that communism in the west

has become an ideology for it's

become an ideology for effeminate low

testosterone

um soy males who are devoid not only of

manhood but of all of the virtues that

are supposed to accompany manhood such

as honesty Integrity dignity

forthrightness

um honor right there's no Honor Code any

longer

you just have these weasels and

worms these lying scum who sound like

this when they talk hi comrade I'm at

the meeting right now yeah that's the

state we're in so whenever I bring this

issue up and I talk about the fact that

there's never been a revolution in

history that was successful that wasn't

led by men in the majority and then

people decide to talk to me about what

Mao said about women holding up half the

sky or what Enver hoja said about the

defense of women's rights in Albania I

hate to break this to you but

neither Mao and verhoja nor any other

communist leader in history was talking

about how women are to be treated on

this phenomenological cultural level of

the internet and memes and personal

relations and even personal prejudices

when it comes to relationships what they

were actually talking about was the fact

that women actually didn't have the

status of Being Human Beings at the time

there was the foot binding practices

there was the fact that there were child

Brides who were sold off when they were

five years old for a sack of

potatoes there is the fact that women

weren't allowed to get an education

there was the fact that women weren't

allowed to participate in the political

process in any capacity the fact that

they were subjugated to prostitution and

slavery that's what they were beginning

from

and on the solid foundation of an

inarguably masculine revolutionary

Foundation right when men men first and

foremost

actually fulfilled the Revolutionary

task of seizing power and building a

state men owing to the theories created

by men and we're going to get to that

part as well decided that the status of

women

um

was also relevant to the you know to

Communism to what communism was and the

primary reason for that was because in

the process of proletarianization that

happens in the 19th century there's no

social distinction between men and women

socially speaking men and women are the

same the same labor value so if you're a

factory worker and you're a man or or

you're a woman it doesn't matter what

your gender is what your sex is because

the labor value that is inherent in the

Commodities being produced is is um

indifferent to that right

so on two levels on the Bourgeois

political level of equal legal rights

and on the level of social equality

which just means at the workplace right

there's this indistinguishability of men

and women and Communists sought to give

recognition to that fact because they

had to right but if you want to talk

about

the some of the non-negotiables that was

never questioned once not again not once

in the entire history of Communism and

I'm going to actually cite relevant

examples of this and we're going to go

through the whole thing and I'm going to

talk to you about this if you actually

go through the history of communism

it has never ever been questioned okay

it has never been questioned that

communism is fundamentally masculine

it has never been questioned that

revolutionaries by and large I mean A

revolution is an event that is only seen

to its conclusion

when men start picking up the gun

there's no there has never been one

exception to this in the entirety of

human history you can talk about how

women's protests led to some kind of

social unrest that's fine women can lead

protests they can protest all they want

but fundamental changes as far as who

holds power is concerned have never ever

ever happened

outside of the leadership of men or at

least extreme majority of men and those

extremely minor examples people like to

point to like the failed German

Revolution uh of the um

Bavarian Soviet Republic with Rosa

Luxembourg I think Rosa Luxembourg was a

hero but let's not kid ourselves that

was a failed Revolution and Luxembourg

was by no means the sole leader of that

Revolution the majority of the leaders

of the German Revolution were met now

Rosa Luxembourg is so remembered as a

figurehead because she did play a very

prominent role theoretically speaking

she made

you know I guess contributions to

Marxism I disagree with those

contributions but she's also remembered

a lot by Western leftists because she's

a token female just like they do with

Angela Davis and a bunch of other women

every time I

you know there's never been a successful

revolution in history without men and

when I say without men I don't mean

simps and I mean actual like a

masculine event

of taking power and seizing power it's

never happened in history

I always get people point to me the

exceptions I might have it's almost like

whenever you say like who's better

at fighting men or women broadly there's

always going to be that feminist impulse

for people to be like what about Ronda

Rousey has what about Ronda Rousey yeah

what about the one percent exception

right what about the one percent

exception just because there are one

percent exceptions doesn't denigrate the

reality of the broad Tendencies and the

general patterns that yes are probably

grounded in something like nature

probably grounded yes in something

materially essential and materially

definite okay

let's let's yeah let's point out how um

it is on you can't say men are better at

women than fighting because of Ronda

Rousey the like small exception right

it's stupid but you talk you

confront Communists with the fact that

for example China today you you look at

the Central Committee of the Communist

Party you look at the Central Committee

of the Communist Party of any ruling

Communist party in history and it is

dominated by men okay at least the

prominent ones in the Soviet Union the

Soviet Union never saw a female leader

I can't think of a communist state that

had a female leader not one okay and we

are but because enverjo said something

about women's rights that somehow makes

this fact insignificant but this is

where the feminists are going to bring

about their Trojan Horse and I'm

actually going to show you some feminist

literature critiquing the Soviet Union

so you can see where these people are

coming from they're going to go ahead

and say well communism is not adequate

we that's why we need feminism Marxism

is not Advocate that's why we need

feminism no we don't need your feminism

you can keep your feminism it has

nothing to do with Marxism it has

nothing to do with Communism go shove it

up your ass it's got nothing to

do with us go um

beg your sorrow sugar daddy and leave us

the alone

we communist men will not entertain

feminism we will not entertain the

demands of the feminists we will not

entertain the of the feminists

and I actually have some experience

toward this end because believe it or

not guys I didn't despite the fact that

I'm such a male chauvinist and such a

misogynist and whatever else they say I

actually never gave a about

opposing feminism in any capacity when I

first started out I was never threatened

by feminism because all of my enemies

were men I was a man at war with other

men like vosh and others I didn't have

female enemies even the women who were

against me were oh never mind I can't

say that

um I can't say that but I I wasn't

threatened by women I've never been

threatened by women uh in in any

personal capacity but especially not on

a political or cultural or social

capacity right I was never threatened by

them I never saw it as a threat I didn't

really care if they wanted to be

feminists go be a

feminist I don't give a right but

it's when I started to realize the true

nature of feminism isn't actually just

about how women are deciding to get

together and um

you know um

attend to their own Affairs I guess I

didn't really have a problem with that I

started to realize how these feminists

started to deliberately serve the aims

of the men that I was at war with so I

really just see feminists as of

the male bourgeoisie I don't actually

respect feminists as a formidable enemy

or a foe I see them as of the

male bourgeoisie I don't actually

respect or recognize feminists

as enemies I just see them as the

of my enemies that's all I see them as

as they're horrors of the capitalist

bourgeoisie I'm going to explain exactly

what I mean by that and why that is

first and foremost

it needs to be established that there is

absolutely no similarity there's no

parallel there's no commonality between

the Communist address of the women

question and feminism

and before I talk about those specific

way in which the communist

uh Communists address the woman's

question I'm going to talk about

feminism and the origins of feminism so

broadly speaking what is feminism let's

just go ahead and Define it because I

always hear this thing that people say

which is that feminism isn't what you're

saying has feminism just means we want

men and women to have some degree of

equality when it comes to politics and

when it comes to formal organizations

and there's feminism is not all toxic

I'm not actually one of those people

who is upset at feminists because

they're too harsh on men well no not

really I don't really think it's

possible to be a gender separatist I

think all feminists are loyal to some

kind of man right I don't think it's

possible for women to segregate and

secede from the male sex and if they do

do that then congratulations I don't

give a about you right but the only

reason I'm talking about them right now

is because the majority of them have

decided to prostitute themselves to my

male enemies right so this is why I'm

talking about them right because I'm

calling out the Sham that they are

speaking on behalf of women and women's

rights when in reality they're speaking

on behalf of the prominently old male

old money bourgeoisie which is their

true Master which is the actual people

they really serve right

anyway

um feminism if you guys didn't know this

is actually a male invention feminism is

a male invention not only literally

speaking just drawing from the fact that

Charles foulier coined the term feminism

not only broadly speaking in terms of

theory about how it was actually

something that came from the mind of a

male who said yeah why are women

different from men they shouldn't be

different how about we just treat them

the same way that came from men that's a

long lineage of Enlightenment men okay

even if we ignore and neglect that fact

even on this more vague kind of

metaphysical level

the origin of feminism is modernity and

modernity is logocentric modernity is

inherently masculine modernity begins

with Descartes who said I think

therefore I am and cogito according to

Descartes is devoid of sexuation women

have cogito and men have cogito so the

thing that unites the equality of men

and women in the first place is

masculine but the Satanism that is

feminism and feminism is a form of

Satanism I'm going to qualify that

because it sounds sensationalist but I

can actually qualify why I think

feminism is a form of Satanism

is also male it's just as male as

anarchism is it's just as male as

liberalism as a whole is

feminism

and this is um

going to be something

that may be a new idea to you but

feminism

is pretty much

when it comes to gender relations the

same thing as anarchism it should be

thought of in the same way it should be

understood in the same way and it should

be treated in the same way feminism is a

form of anarchism now what do I mean by

that in the case of anarchism

because of the collapse of any

traditional legitimation of statehood

there is a new fundamental metaphysical

distrust for Statehood right and only

this collapse this negativity of the

destruction of legitimate forms of

statehood becomes reified as an ends in

a state in and of itself and that's what

anarchism is now I've if you don't

remember I gave a lecture on anarchism

and why Hitler was an anarchist and I

talked about the history of anarchism

rooting it and you know the English

Civil War and the Protestant Reformation

but feminism is actually coming out of

the same thing and obeying the same

exact logic because feminism doesn't

just say men and women are equal

feminism goes a step farther

and decides to claim that

every expression and manifestation of

gender differences is the result of some

kind of primordial arbitrary inequality

between men and women just like how

anarchists believe that every expression

of statehood and state power is the

expression of our primordial inequality

of man over man which is an injustice

because all men are equal and therefore

there should be no State and there

should be no hierarchy feminism is the

exact same way it grounds all

manifestations of the differences

between Sexes insofar as they're

expressed in reality and that expression

is called gender right by them because

what I have come to learn about

feminists is that they basically believe

that gender

is the problem that even even when the

radical feminists they say Okay sex is

okay

but whenever sex

um

is phenomenally intelligible culturally

that's gender and that's therefore

something that has to be opposed and

genocidally

um eradicated in the same way that

anarchists were you know kind of squeal

and wine every time there's a semblance

of hierarchy or authority in an

organization you know anarchists are

like well who are you to be the boss of

the party who are you to tell me what to

do and like feminists have the same

exact thing they'll make problems out of

nothing right I have first-hand

experience with this now I used to be

friendly toward feminists and then just

because I'm a man just because

I'm a man right no other reason

obeying the normal natural laws

um

that had been passed down to me right

who are you would I be yeah I mean it's

it's rooted in the same fundamental

hysteria and psychosis and most

importantly metaphysical distrust that

every expression of differences between

gender right have to owe themselves to

some kind of

um to some kind of like arbitrary

willful inequality and this actually is

the source of feminist resentment toward

men feminists look at men and say oh

you're just basking in my oppression

you're just basking in the difference

you pose to me but the in men here are

kind of innocent in this case right I'm

just talking about a very I'm not

talking about all the expressions of

male crimes against women it's talking

about a very broad level like a man

could be totally innocent and doing

nothing wrong nothing wrong at all

and a feminist will still Harbor

resentment toward him and the feminists

will say well this is because of the

crimes of men against women but that's

not the case it's because feminists have

a a you know it's just easy Freudian

electra complex they think

that the man stole something from them

right the reason this man just finds it

so natural and into intuitive

to be different from me

is because he stole something from me he

took it from me I should be able to have

that right and it's what it really is is

just a misplaced form of sexual

resentment

okay because that impulse that hey a man

has something I want usually should

manifest itself in a natural setting as

just sexual attraction but but when you

turn it into a kind of ideology it turns

into sexual resentment right

um which are very actually similar to

each other and if that sounds familiar

to you it should because that's actually

what characterizes on the reverse end of

the coin the incel phenomena

in cells are pretty much caught up in

the same form of misrecognition in cells

who are men are

oftentimes consciously actually

misplacing the natural attraction they

have to the opposite sex into a form of

sexual resentment and and and here it's

it's simpler I guess because in their

case it's because the people that

they're attracted to are not getting

with them and they're not able to

them right

but I kind of feel like in cells are

more honest than feminists because in

sales will straight up say I'm mad

because I can't get women are not

giving me so I'm mad and that's

why everyone recognizes in cells as

illegitimate incel is just a it's a

derogatory term I'm called an insult

you're called an insult we're all in

cells I guess if we're not um

you know I I guess on Twitter Twitter's

probably the only places on Earth where

a fat uh disgusting slob Low T

estrogenic dude who has to beg for a

crumb of can call a man like me an

incel and me and Jackson but

that is the case but I feel like

installs are pretty honest about their

sexual resentment they want they

can't get any so they're mad right but

women are dishonest about their sexual

resentment women will not just say I'm

mad because men don't want me they'll

say I'm mad because I'm being oppressed

by men I am primordially oppressed by

men and I want to actually entertain the

following question guys why do we make

this assumption we're living in the same

capitalist Society we're living in the

same historical era why do we make this

assumption that women don't have the

same level of resentment that men do why

do we think that incellism is just the

thing that men have you think men are

the only people who are sexually

frustrated and then I guess I got a lot

of feminists will say well Haas we're

sexually frustrated but we we just um

carry all that weight silently our

fundamental sexual resentment doesn't

manifest itself in any outward fashion

like it does within cells well I beg to

differ sexuality is constitutive

of human subjectivity it is the most

fundamental thing about us it is the

fundamental grounding of our sense of

selfhood our identity and our ego I

think sex honestly is more important

than money on in terms of defining your

real status and your real ego and your

real identity it is so fundamental to

who you are as a human being I beg to

differ that women's sexual resentment

doesn't find any outward manifestation

in the same way that in cells do now

I'll grant you that male sexual

resentment tends to just manifest itself

in the form of anti-social violence like

spree shootings and killings and all

these horrible things I agree but

there's also an outward manifestation of

female sexual resentment which is

manifest confess itself in a different

way and it primarily manifests itself in

the form of feminism and manifests

itself in the form of feminism and

manifests itself in the form of cancel

culture cancel culture is an inherently

feminine thing by the way and manifests

itself in the form of destroying

people's reputations destroying people's

livelihoods not by directly violent

means like going and getting a Gun and

shooting people or beating people but

more so through social manipulation to

basically socially ostracize someone to

such a great degree that they become

dead right like more or less may as well

be dead right

so women pretty much kill people on a

social level men kill people on a

physical level now I I agree that the

what men do is worse when they're

sexually resentful right to a huge

degree I agree it's it's worse because

in a woman's case you still have life

and there's hope but the problem is that

that's not always true right a woman you

know that saying from um

Emmett Till there's nothing more

dangerous than a white woman's tears

well there's a reason for that because a

woman's tears can lead to a man getting

killed right

so it's it's just come it's just they're

they're they're the same phenomena but

they're just being expressed in

different ways and everyone loves to

talk about the incel thing and the

problem that poses it doesn't really

pose a problem uh in communist spaces it

I mean maybe it does but the incels just

disguise themselves as male feminists

see

feminism on the male side of things is

just a form of in-cell cope it's

basically saying that the man's access

to women see I'll explain this to you

there's two forms of incellism right

the right wing kind is individualistic

it pretty much just says that my access

to women

is because women are and I hate

them and women I I don't like them

right that's the male

sorry that's like the mainstream overt

uh obvious form of insulism but

communist in cellism

it's not communist leftist in cellism

primarily manifests itself in an edible

rage toward the figure of the Father

which is that

the patriarchal father is depriving me

the man of having access to women which

means sexist patriarchy is making it

harder for me a fat disgusting ugly slob

worthless slob from being able to

the women I want to right I can't

women because of sexism restricting

women's sexual Liberty if we didn't have

so much patriarchy if we had more sex

positivity I would be able to get more

if we were more amicable towards

sex work and we we made it there was

less stigma attached to it I would be

able to access women in a better way so

it's too it's the pretty much the exact

same

expression of incellism right it's just

there's different kinds one is

individualistic and blames women the

other one is socialistic and blames the

male patriarch right but they're rooted

in the exact same form of sexual

resentment the exact same form okay

on the woman's side of things

the primary form is feminism right and

why is that by the way what what

actually is feminism and why do I think

feminism and communism or Marxism are so

fundamentally incompatible

because in the case of feminism it's not

just about we want men and women to be

treated equally and fairly on a legal or

on a social level

feminism says we want men and women to

be equal on a sexual level

at the level of our interpersonal

relations we want them to be equal at

the level of the family we want them to

be the same at the level of how we

interact with each other in

relationships we want to be the same at

the level of how we are perceived we

want to be the same right that's where

that comes from

and again feminism kind of reifies this

destruction of traditional forms of

gender relations and their legitimation

and

reifies that in the same way anarchism

reifies the vacuum of state power

collapsing during the English Civil War

into an ends in itself just like how

traditional manhood and traditional

gender relations collapse and all that's

left is this kind of boundless

modernistic negativity that is

associated with the feminine essence

all that's left is that and this is the

ultimate truth feminism is really just a

form of gender Calvinism gender

Calvinism which says that gender

relations are a world of total depravity

and the possibility of any good or at

least authenticity being there is

impossible

it's based on a metaphysics of distrust

and I'm just saying oh women have a

right to be distrustful of men has it's

not what I'm saying

I'm saying it's based on this idea that

every possible it is impossible it is

impossible for

men to ever be trusted ever even if a

man is innocent even if he's done no

crime even he's done nothing wrong the

mustache of Stalin indicts him Stalin

could be a great guy Stalin's not a

horrible guy but because he's just a

he's got that mustache and he's a male

patriarch he must be indicted as bad

it's basically a metaphysics of bad

faith

feminism just like in cellularism is

based in a metaphysics of bad faith and

distrust right and

the idea of feminism is basically that

women can form this shield to protect

them from the risks of male

um

criminality or male transgression

through some kind of alternative to the

patriarchy through this kind of feminine

um

sociality and collectivity right but the

feminine sociality and collectivity is

quite literally just a harem that's just

a harem feminine sociality which is

supposed to be a weapon against the it's

supposed to be a shield against the um

risks associated with men

still is grounded on a firm foundation

of male structural violence

uh all of the feminism we see in our

society that's affected in actual

practice

rests upon the foundation of violent

State and police power which is yes

necessary to enforce I mean

put it this way

if a man rapes a woman and when I say

rape I mean violently rapes them

straight up no room for ambiguity you

know violently rapes a woman

who are you gonna go to

is is the is there going to be an Amazon

Collective of of of uh militant women

that are going to come in and do

something you know what the truth is

that's just not practical and it's not

realistic there's going to be some kind

of male Authority and method of

enforcement to deal with that right so

feminine sociality and collectivity is a

harem and I don't even just mean that in

the sense of a harem of like oh these

they're just the horrors of some man I

also mean in the fact that

the politics of the Harem which existed

by the way for example in the Ottoman

Empire The Harem had its own politics

but the harem was not based in the

actual Foundation of statehood it was

just this kind of excess of gossip and

manipulation and social perceptions and

kind of things relating to that nature

that's the reality of the Harem The

Harem rests upon the foundation of some

kind of patriarchy there's no

way around it patriarchy is fundamental

it's essential every form of female

empowerment that's being passed off as a

form of female empowerment actually

actively depends on a form of patriarchy

and I think the difference that we're

witnessing right now with Andrew Tate

and men looking for

they're not it's not that we have this

narrative like vosh is saying oh men are

looking for a role model of some kind I

think it's more

it's it's more um specific than that

it's that men

have realized right

have become aware of the fact that

they're being conned men have become

aware of the fact that

they are men that they hold you know

they hold

masculinity itself they they they

have that burden right

and they're just looking for a way

for that to be recognized or for that to

make sense even mostly right

because it's not like so I I saw

something fundamentally on my

TL

the other day I I it's it's like

bafflingly I saw some that

was saying oh women are on the March

right now and has he represents the

reactionary attempt for men to cling to

power because women are at the

Gates and women are about to take power

and it's so stupid dude what a

baffling lack of self-awareness yeah I

get that the girl bosses

who are being promoted in our society

right now they will never be the people

in power the people in power right now

are men the people Andrew Tate are

addressing are young men who want to

overthrow those men but this this idea

that the girl boss phenomena somehow

represents like this oh now Society is

going to be ruled by women Society will

never be ruled by women and has never

been ruled by women

and if you want to point out to these

matriarchical uh hunter-gatherer

societies as an example of matriarchy

they're not okay women don't actually

rule because there's no ruling to begin

with there's no real established form of

statehood there the state that such is

absent right so the reason women have so

much influence in those societies is the

little societies are almost entirely

dictated by convention right and yes

women are

um caretakers of convention and

tradition but when it comes to ruling

and rulership there's never been a

female dictatorship in history I mean

even these female matriarchal Queens

like Queen Elizabeth

and so on and so forth that was just

symbolic right and that is fundamentally

resting upon masculine and male forms of

violence okay

so yeah

it's like I I want I want people to just

come to terms with something whenever

you point out exceptions you say oh yeah

we should encourage women to be listen

you need to realize how much you're

taking for granted like I saw some

on Twitter say hi didn't

Mao say women hold up half the sky

can you guys think about that for a

second how absurd that is

in order to justify

The View that women play such a

prominent role sorry that women are all

you need for a revolution to happen

because all I actually said was that you

need men I didn't even say you didn't

need women I just said you need men

there's never been a revolution in

history that wasn't led by men period

right

or at least a successful one

but can you believe that someone would

cite

a man Mao zeitong to justify that like I

think you're taking for granted the fact

that Mao the pla you know that's what

carried the Chinese proletarian

dictatorship right you know there was no

proletarian dictatorship unless the men

rise up why is that so controversial I

just wonder why is that so like

bafflingly impossible to come to terms

with yeah

yeah the revolution doesn't happen

unless the men rise up I mean why is

that so hard to understand

and before people say but has what about

Ronda Rousey

what about the raw women play but the

thing is in our society of girl boss

feminism which is the society we live in

don't tell me when you go to a

DSA meeting that that's a patriarchy

it's not

don't sit here and tell me if

you walk into a PSL meeting and

the man not like this hi I'm just

running to talk right now

um basically that's what the men sound

like don't tell me

don't tell me this feminists

always act like oh we know Haas you're

just stating the obvious Haas everyone

knows men are needed but no one's

appreciating how women are needed no you

don't know how much men are

needed because I go into your

organizations I go into your DSA I go

into your PSL and there are no

real men there are none it's not

something that's appealing to men it's

just unappealing to men all of leftism

and communism in America it's a

feminine ideology it's something that

only appeals to women it's a

effeminate feminine ideology and even

though the majority of these people

and these organizations are men they are

the most low testosterone men in our

society they don't represent the

masculine like they don't represent

masculinity they don't represent the

male signifier right these are the Low T

simps that need to go to these

organizations because it's their only

reproductive strategy to get you

want to do some evolutionary psychology

their evolutionary strategy is to be

feminists who are joining these

socialist organization because they need

some socialized because they're

not man enough to get some

private so they need socialized

that's why they join these

organizations do not sit here

and tell me that you are actually

appreciating the extent to which

Communism yes was a fundamentally

masculine phenomena and I'm actually

going to cite some stuff here because

even when you talk about the role that

women play

in communist revolutions and how

important that was if you actually study

and I implore you to actually study this

the history of Communism and the woman's

question women were only ever afforded

political recognition within the context

of communist revolutions or even

communist projects primarily

to the extent that they weren't women

all of the aspects of femininity

uh in the October Revolution and even

during the Chinese culture Revolution

those were seen as decadent Bourgeois

waste of time makeup fashion doing your

hair like this a women's concerns

women's interests women's like all of

these things were derided as bourgeois

women yes were accepted only to the

extent that they weren't woman though

right I'll give you an example of this

because you may not be understanding

what I'm trying to say here communism

implicitly has always been understood to

be something fundamentally masculine in

nature

so this is from 17 moments in Soviet

history it's a pretty good archive

of uh you know commentary on Soviet

history

uh and

it talks about the consumer throughout

the 1920s right and it talks about how

men outnumbered women eight to one right

and that was because the ethos of young

Communists were coded masculine even if

the girl neglected boys torments her

very femininity precluded her from being

a true communist

so the only way women get accepted in

the comsumal at this time is if they

shed any semblance of femininity they

have to be like men right in order to

craft a new everyday life young male

Communists denied all signs of the

feminism in mannerism dress and emotions

the most visible symbols were the

leather jacket knee-high leather boots a

Sam brown belt a pistol indeed one

commentator noted that the chidor of the

so-called pure-blooded proletarian

included a whole assembly of fashion and

attitude com Smalls went around in

dilipated boots with permanently stuck

on black dirt

a long worn out leather jacket living on

dry crust and denying themselves rest

entertainment and often food emotions

like sentimentality were rejected for a

cold hard demeanor the ideal Communists

according to cardsef was a serious

business-like show disdain for dancing

and gallantry only saying revolutionary

songs dispersed in secluded pairs

didn't

attend Village parties

and only hung out with non-party guys

for political discussions and not for

fun

okay

now here's the most important part

because this is where I'm going to talk

about where did the Soviet state

actually begin to recognize femininity

because women's equality in the Soviet

state was legal equality and it was the

social equality as in the economic

equality of you can have the same jobs

that we do and you can get paid the same

way as long as you're doing the same job

so it's legal and social equality at the

workplace but private domestic life as

far as what gender roles were and what

the expressions of gender was

they didn't give a about that

women's equality in communism was just

the right to be a man pretty much on a

social and political level women had the

right to do anything socially and

politically that men were granted the

privilege of doing it's not that women

okay I'm gonna continue though right

because I'm gonna I'm gonna explain what

I'm what I'm getting at here

it was best seen in how girls who

adopted it were treated

girls struggling to fit in cast off

their dresses makeup and other forms of

feminine beauty for a more masculine

style as statements of their

revolutionary authenticity

however this is the important part

to come small males the gender bending

was an anathema

even Nikolai samasco the people's

commissar of Health

decried these masculine women with

disheveled frequently dirty hair a

cigarette between her lips deliberately

Gruff like a man deliberately rude as

violations of nature itself

this is the entire context of what's

called in Soviet history by feminists

and others the double burden problem

because when people talk about women's

Liberation in the USSR you need to

realize

that this was not something feminist it

was not something pro-feminist

and it wasn't even necessarily

a great thing for women

because it came with a double burden

because although you were given the

right to work the same way as men and

you had to follow the same social

standards and expectations of men you

also still had to attend to your

household duties your household chores

rearing the children and attending to

your feminine you know

concerns so that's the whole thing about

the double burden right

um there's also an article for that in

this archive but it's it's very well

researched and studied

by Scholars of Soviet history

right it's called the double burden

because believe it or not

the actual authentic core of femininity

that is the indivisible remainder after

you achieve political and social

equality is irreducibly natural

distinction between man and woman right

it's what Stalin would called

women's ability to fulfill the great and

honorable Duty that nature has given

quote them

which is what being a mother motherhood

rearing raising a family right that's

what Stalin recognized as what nature

gave to women

so you have to understand that

women's rights and communism didn't

address

femininity in any social capacity it

just addressed the fact that beforehand

women by account of their sex were

excluded from participating in things

that men participated in and that was

gone now right but that doesn't mean

they were reifying the feminine question

as a social question and that's really

how I'm going to Define feminism here

feminism is when you do something

impossible

it's when you take femininity

something that is inherently

beyond the ability for any social form

to address or reify or somehow

domesticate right into a clear discreet

form to be enforced that's that's

masculinity right feminism is an

ideology of hermaphrodite it's a

hermaphrodite

ideology and I'm going to qualify that

by saying feminism attempts

to turn the fact that men cannot be Wim

sorry women cannot be men into a

metaphysical Injustice the fact that

there is never going to be an ability to

distill this feminine Essence into some

kind of socially

Eternal form

uh it's not what I'm saying probably

doesn't make sense to you right now I'm

going to qualify what I mean by that

femininity as such

is not something that can be given

social recognition

when I say social recognition I don't

mean social acknowledgment I mean you

can't have special rights for femininity

you can't have special rights addressed

to the inevitable microaggressions that

arise from the encounter between

masculine and feminine temperaments you

can't address femininity on any social

or Collective level femininity is the

Adobe of private life it's the Adobe of

the family femininity is the Adobe of

the unconscious of all of the relations

that are implicit and unconscious in

society rather than overt femininity did

exist in the USSR and it was venerated

and given recognition sorry given

acknowledgment in the USSR in art and in

culture and so on and so forth but there

was never femininity as such

was never raised to the level of being a

social question that's what I'm trying

to say it was never elevated to being a

social question

reified forms of femininity were not

particularly appreciated in the USSR

things like beauty pageants didn't exist

until the very end of the ussr's

existence

um

you know uh the idea of women's sexual

empowerment with the sexual Revolution

Unthinkable in the USSR until the

Gorbachev ears right

um the the idea of the figure of the

mother Gaia the figure of the feminine

goddess

being this kind of like source of female

empowerment and and impassion kind of

resentment toward men impossible in the

USSR which is still

fundamentally a

a patriarchal society

at its core right

it's not a society that's attempting to

kind of um

metaphysically reify femininity into

some kind of political signifier that's

that's my problem with feminism it turns

something private fundamentally private

fundamentally unconscious into a

political signifier

feminism right it's an ism of femininity

I find this to be an impossibility it's

basically trying to turn the universal

sociological woman right the entire body

of humanity the feminine body of

humanity into a man I find that to be

satanic right

feminism is just an infinite regress and

a bad

Infinity pretty much what Hegel would

call a bad Infinity it's an infinite

regress it's never a feminist demands

could never be satisfied and never

fulfilled in reality

and that's also true for an anarchist

demand and Anarchist will never get what

they want a feminist will never get what

they want but that's what drives them

forward the fact they're not getting

what they want is their resin I don't

know how to pronounce it it's their

reason for it's their causes

belly right it's their reason for going

on

and on and

what's disgusting to me about feminism

and I'm going to go ahead and say it's

worse than incellism at least on a

philosophical level

in cells will plainly admit I'm mad

because I can't get feminists will

say my inability to find a man in my

sexual resentment has led me to contrive

this vast political and social question

it's so narcissistic and

disgusting at least the incel is

just

openly individually like saying yeah

this is about me being butthurt right

when women are sexually resentful and

they're they're turning it into a yeah

that right this is why

because in the absence of strong fathers

in the absence of strong men in their

life and yeah I'll admit in the absence

of a decent selection of real men to

choose from in their life women have

basically gained feminist women I mean

have basically deigned to the conclusion

that they can they can uh

find allow themselves to be in the

Embrace of a man who will never let them

down and that man is Satan okay

because feminism is based and has its

origins in a man feminism is male in

origin feminism is the metaphysical

distrust feminism bases itself in the

accuser of the Bible feminism is an

ideology of the accuser and if you don't

know who the accuser is the accuser is

Satan and the accusation inherent in

feminism

is that every expression of sexual

difference in our society every

expression of differences between men

and women

must necessarily have its origins in

some kind of Injustice and some kind of

malign

uh malign crime malign Injustice and

reality it can't just be possible that

men and women are different

because they're actually

different right it has to have its roots

in some kind of malign

inequality that's the view of the

accuser Satan right

Satan is the one who says that all of

the differences of God's creation

are malign

in intention right man is always evil

and corrupt

Satan is like the Joker and

Batman man can never be good man can

never follow the footsteps of Christ

right man is accursed man is inherently

evil

God's truth on Earth is a lie right this

is the view of the accuser Satan it's

also inherent in anarchism when it comes

to the understanding of statehood

but what feminism and anarchism actually

have in common because we don't actually

have to equate them is liberalism

liberalism is the is what's built upon

this idea of negative rights according

to the same metaphysical distrust

liberalism says that because we have

lost an ability to connect to our

Humanity in any positive intuitive or

natural sense we have to contrive

institutions of abstract abstractly

Universal human relations instead of the

real ones that actually exist and this

is completely in contrast to the spirit

of not only Marx's Discovery but the

experience of Communism itself communism

is rooted in a fundamental metaphysical

trust not distrust the proletarian

dictatorship for example can do whatever

it wants it does have impunity and

unlimited power there are no formal

institutional checks and balances but

communism is rooted in a spirit of trust

between the party and the people without

this Mutual trust between the party and

the people the whole Enterprise of the

proletarian dictatorship and communism

becomes impossible with the

collectivization which was a very harsh

thing that happened

peasants were mistrustful of the

motivations of the ruling Communist

party there was a distrust there it did

lead to conflict but what happened

afterwards although so much power was in

the hands of the Communist party and

although the peasants

gave up so much direct forms of power

that they thought they had it led to an

un like an unprecedented level of wealth

and prosperity and you know

um Quality of Life Improvement for the

peasants and they they became grateful

and appreciative

after the fact they saw why it was

necessary after the fact why because the

process of Communism was rooted in a

fundamental metaphysics of trust

that's why

so it's it's completely opposed to

feminism

it's like oh do you blame women for not

trusting men well on a personal level if

it was just on a personal level that

would be fine but when you come to say

that every form of patriarchal Authority

is to be condemned and accused right

like I was I'm I am a victim of the

accuser right I came into the

space and so many feminists attacked me

for what right why do you attack me

really based on what what have I done

really right well they say oh you

represent all the crimes of men have I

committed any of those crimes can you

really justify that accusation no you're

feminism is a form of Satanism it's a

it's inherently evil right and it's male

in origin it doesn't even represent

women because women can never be

represented socially

woman refers to the non-all with Lacon

called the non-all of sociality

the reason there's no political or

social form of femininity is because

sociality as a whole is feminine all of

the social bonds that glue us together

are imminently and already inherently

feminine they cannot find any

concentrated representation in anything

it is already imminently feminine this

is coming from the idea of so sociology

right sociology which basically

is the view

that the entire body of humanity

represents the fourth feminine

um

element to the Christian Trinity right

the father son the Holy Ghost and the

Sophia the Sophia representing the whole

the non-all of the collective body of

humanity it's an inherently mystical

femininity feminism is a kind of harsh

modernistic attempt to contrive a

logocentric understanding of femininity

and The Feminine which has led to a

complete disaster

a complete disaster again I find it so

funny

people say Mao said women hold up half

the sky

again

first of all the implicit assumption

already is that men uphold the other

half right

but worse yet

do you actually think you're saying

something revolutionary when you say

that now you're beating a dead

horse you go into a PSL meeting

you're a bunch of low T cuck males you

go into a DSA meeting it's the

same thing oh guys let's be more

feminine and effeminate that's not what

Mao meant by the way when Mouse says

women hold half the Sky he's not

saying men should be more effeminate and

should stop being masculine he's just

saying that women should be acknowledged

they should be acknowledged I'm not

saying they shouldn't be acknowledged

right they're already acknowledged it's

men who are not only not acknowledged

but impossible in communist spaces you

can't be a man

in the PSL or in the GSA you

can't everything you do will be a

microaggression imagine me imagine if I

was a formal

a formal man I never you cost used any

swear words I didn't do anything but

just because I'm a bearded guy who talks

the way I do and the tone that I do I

don't sound a metrosexually like this

just because I don't sound like some

kind of like self-aware Champion Trap

House guy just because I sound like I

have a lot of testosterone I will make

people uncomfortable they will be uneasy

around me and I will be like

um this guy is bad for women's rights

why right

I'm sorry I paused super chats let me

unpause them thank you so much Jen I

appreciate you slay King thank you so

much Jen I appreciate you man

hey so much Julian appreciate it chaos I

live in Michigan too and I love the Maca

movement appreciate you Julian I love

hearing that thank you

based thank you so much Chris feminism's

view of masculinity is schopenhauer's

will a caged Beast only subdued with

stoicism

well kind of thank you so much lower

would you appreciate it black red guard

and we've left radio and many others

hide behind women and trans to demonize

Islamic States like Iran all to

indoctrine what I really find is why is

it that

um women's rights has been a signifier

in communist spaces for weak men to hide

behind whenever you call out or make

weak men uncomfortable they'll

immediately talk about how envir hoja

fervently defended women's rights I'm

not talking about women's rights you

I'm not talking about

women right now I'm talking about you

being a I'm not talking about

women I'm talking about you who despite

is a male you're effeminate women's

rights it doesn't mean feminization it

doesn't mean effeminizing men that's not

what it meant actually

the opposite is true and almost all

communist contexts women's rights

actually just meant the rights for men

women to be masculine but when women

became masculine they had to Forfeit

their femininity so it's like that's why

they oftentimes didn't right

you go into Communist States and guess

what there's still a huge gender gap

there's still a huge disparity in terms

of what industries women choose to work

in compared to men there's still a huge

disparity in terms of expectations and

gender roles in all of these societies

that's not because of patriarchy

it's because there are inherent

differences between men and women which

in communist societies were recognized

and acknowledged as natural but what do

these feminists have to say for example

about the fact that in Soviet art women

were often represented in the form of

agricultural peasants where men were

represented as industrial laborers well

let's see what feminists have to say

about this

um

on one level such images such as

piamov's women delegate corroborated The

Constitution's claims that women in the

Soviet Union already enjoyed equality

now this is actually why Alexandra

collantes

female fighting organization was

disbanded in 1930 because kalanti said

we women already have equality in the

Soviet Union now what did she mean by

that does she mean that women and men

retreated the same way no she meant that

to the furthest extent possible or

relevant to the aims of a communist

state men and women are equal there's no

Injustice anymore because now the

difference between men and women that we

see are just resulting from nature

rather than patriarchal Injustice but

feminists will step in and say no

there's still a hidden patriarchical

Injustice in the Soviet women Union you

know a lot of these um

black panther women if you listen to

them today they go in the Black Panthers

there was a primordial patriarchy going

on no there wasn't you're just a

feminist sellout there was no

patriarchy in the black panthers

they did a lot they did a lot to help

women you know have a voice and but

it's it's never enough

it's never gonna be enough for

feminists why because they're anarchists

they're based in a metaphysics of

distrust and accusation even when

there's no crime being committed even

when nothing bad is going on

it's an it's an inherently satanic

thing which is completely not

only antithetical to what communism is

but to the actual lived historical

experience of Communism talking about

how women's status was uplifted in

Communist States is irrelevant to the

point no one here no one here is

interested in making it impossible for

women formally to do the same things

that men do but what we are saying is

that the disparities in terms of what

women choose to do and what men do are

not grounded in some kind of patriarchal

Injustice the fact that the majority of

leaders of any Collective organization

that is Sovereign are men isn't rooted

in patriarchy or some kind of conspiracy

to keep women down it's rooted in the

fact that men and women are inherently

different and fulfill different roles

and feminists

believe me believe me feminists are not

interested in becoming men they're not

call their Bluff I want you to start

treating women like men and see if

they're gonna like it see stop being

sensitive to them stop caring about all

their needs stop caring about all their

special feminine

whatever nature don't be sensitive to

women anymore treat them like you treat

a man you think they're gonna

appreciate that they're not I promise

you they're not right I promise you

they're not they are engaging in a

hysteria no reasonable man should

entertain the they're

doing

women don't want to be Stalin they don't

want to be the leader they just

want validation and recognition and what

they primarily want is to have a

man

or to be halved by a man honestly

speaking that's what they want

the Russian women's organization Senate

they'll supported no fault divorce but

the actual women protested to have it

removed to protect their families

feminists ignore this exactly red saw

that's a perfect example because I was

reading earlier I was reading about how

the divorce legislation in the Soviet

Union which was actually something

feminist you know would have been in

favor of women hated it women would

constantly write to the um the

Communist Party Central Authority they'd

be like these hoes are are

sleeping with our husbands having kids

and our husbands have to pay them

alimony and they're sleeping around

their hoes their they have loose

morals that's what they would they would

literally say this it wouldn't say

hoes but they'd be like they have loose

morals they have no sense of

responsibility and they're dirty these

dirty women are going around sleeping

with all of our men having kids with

them and forcing our men to pay alimony

there's the case of this one guy you

know who killed himself because

this woman forced him to pay alimony

even while she was another man

and that's the regular complaints women

would give to the central

Authority

in Moscow

okay women but it's right on my point

women don't want to be filling the

central authority of the Communist Party

in China they don't want that right what

they want is recognition because if they

wanted that they would do it based on

Merit they wouldn't say oh we need some

special affirmative action because we're

women no we're gonna treat you

equally and on the basis of your Merit

you will be promoted I am not saying

women should be discriminated against

I'm saying they shouldn't get any

special treatment

if women want to be leaders be a leader

effectively be a leader you know how

many women I see on Twitch and

complain that they don't get as many

viewers as men

you don't get as many viewers as men

because not as many people want to watch

you

it's not a conspiracy you're not

entitled to the same thing men do

you're not entitled to that Society

shouldn't have to intervene on a social

level

or a chair its Essence is still yeah

well why should Society have to

intervene

and rectify all differences between men

and women that appear to favor men

sorry but there are advantages and

disadvantages of being both a man and a

woman period

there's advantages and disadvantages

it's stupid like for example in

a family who's gonna be the one that has

to go and give their life to protect the

family the man

who is gonna go have if they're if

you're at a bar and there's a fight you

think okay you want to be equal woman

you want to go fight the guy at

the bar you're not going to fight the

guy at the bar that's a man's job you're

not gonna do that you're not

gonna be you know what about Ronda

Rousey house what about Ronda Rousey

shut the up dude really you know

how dishonest you're being be

honest okay be honest there's

nothing inherently uh sexist or

misogynistic about acknowledging the

fact men and women are different it's

just common sense I'm so

sick of feminists with their stupid cope

you're not gonna create an Amazon

fighting women's organization

if you want go do it holy why am I

the one preventing like these feminists

attacked me all the time as if I'm

preventing them listen you

listen to me

my audience is like 90 male what the

do you want from me you want me to

tell my people to be okay

everyone in my audience go wear a dress

go wear a dress I guess that's

what they want from us what do you

want literally I don't give a f

you want to go make an all women's party

go do it why do you have to ride

my dick why do you need my dick huh you

need my success you're resentful toward

me go be your own woman streamer

then go Do Your Own Thing

why are you so resentful toward me like

I took it from you

you know what I mean they're like always

attacking me all the time online and

thank you my father's generation

mlspww it was a truism to accept the

reality that communism especially in

America required a level of aggression

slash toughness even beyond that of the

rest of the world Chris that's what I'm

saying man thanks so much for the 10.

but you're not really saying here I'm

just saying if it turns out that

the people who are more

masculine happen to be men or the people

who are more like you know

aggressive and tough happened to be men

that's not because of an I'm not even

saying men deserve special privileges

I'm not saying that I'm just

saying don't and whine

when a communist organization has a 90

male leadership stop making it seem like

it's a Injustice it's not it's

because men and women are not the

saying that's what I'm actually

saying here like the point isn't

even really like for example take take a

military take a military

take a military okay your Homeland gets

invaded

all right we need people who are

aggressive who are warriors who carry

guns and who are going to go die for

their country

now

and they're going to be on the front

lines of battle

now we're not discriminating against

women as long as you fit this criteria

that's that's what we need

okay

majority of that is going to be male

majority of that is going to be male

that's not because of a patriarchal

conspiracy okay shut the up it's

not an injustice that there's a

difference there it's not okay that's

what I'm trying to say but feminism

which is grounded in a metaphysics of

distrust is gonna sit here and it's

gonna go now that's because of a

conspiracy that's because of Injustice

we need to destroy the Soviet state and

support Hitler because Stalin's

patriarchical we need to support Hitler

because not all of the Soviet troops

we're women I mean it's stupid

right even I'm not I'm by the way you're

denying the role women played

um fighting in wars and and uh on the

battlefield and being revolutionaries no

it's just that that was never that's

never been called into question women's

role in Revolution

in American leftist spaces has never

once been called into question but it

really does feel like people forgot

about the fact

that these were masculine endeavors

through and through and women to the

extent that they were participating in

these things were doing so in a

masculine capacity but even then take

Soviet women on the front lines

you had incredible Heroes like

pablochenko and others right I'm not I

would never deny that okay

but as a general broad phenomenon it's

still true that

the role men and women played on the

front lines

was different women primarily served as

Medics men

were serving as infantry troops on a far

more you know on a far greater level so

my point there is that that's not in

it's not unjust that that's the fact

that's not that's a natural expression

of differences between men and women but

feminists want to sit here and tell us

things like that are the result of

patriarchal relations shut the up

you're I mean honestly go have your

feminist Revolution I'm not entertaining

it my infrared will not entertain it

unless you can come debate me and and

prove with reason why we should

entertain this We're not gonna

entertain it

We're not gonna entertain it

why should we

feminism is wrecker all feminists

want to do is turn us into and

make us the eunuchs

of the capitalist ruling class

that pays their rent

and pays for their think tanks

and institutions that's all they want to

do all feminists want to do

is feminize us and turn us what into a

weaker opponents of our enemies sorry

we're not under to get the out of

here you're not welcome here we don't we

don't feminism is counter-revolutionary

feminism is anti-communist period

thank you so much African communities I

will not wear the dress WTF

well then you're sexist apparently

you're sexist then

based

male feminists love dropping licanians

as a fancy feminism can be explained as

anxiety well my dude look up what he

said about perverts no respect for

sexual distance

I am not anxious about women

I am just

not scared to point out that communism

is masculine Revolution is masculine

every masculine truth a man feels in his

heart communism is supposed to resonate

in that with that

my problem isn't that I think women are

becoming too powerful

I don't think women are becoming

powerful I don't

I actually think women are just

protecting the power of old men who are

already in power and preventing the

younger generation of men from

challenging the male authorities that

enable their retardation

that's actually what I believe I don't

actually believe

women are a threat

I think weak males are a threat

I think men who listen to women are a

threat I think men listening to these

feminists are a threat I think every

time I see a man

shouldn't we also be nice to women

you know what

you are a simp you are so

desperate you are so desperate

for some literally oh you're

not a Saint you're not a

leader of the Harem you are a incel who

has instead of having women as the

object of your resentment you have it as

the patriarchal male

again in cells either women are

preventing their access or a patriarch

like me is preventing their actors yeah

I'm preventing your access I'm the

reason you can't get you

I'm the one who's doing it yeah me

I'm the bad guy

you pervert ugly it's not

the fact that you're a fat ugly dumb

it's the fact that I'm preventing

you

it's not the fact that you

have a testosterone level

that is in the negatives

it's my fault

it's my fault right

I feel like a lot of you know what it is

men have a fetish

for just imitating women and women are

enabling this and playing along with it

to as a channel for their sexual

resentment thank you so much appreciate

you if leftists in America read Soviet

literature like how the steel was

tempered they would know what it meant

to be a communist man that's what I mean

I mean men young men have these

revolutionary instincts they want to

shake the system they want to

bring it down their Mongol

Warriors stirring in their

stomach and Andrew Tate

is speaking to that

and worse before that's a bad thing shut

the up man oh because young men

don't want to be feminized socialized

that's a bad thing

if you're so upset

see if if feminists were legit they

would just be like you know what we want

to join you we want to join you if if

feminists were real they would be like

all right we see you

we want to join you I don't like how we

women are treated as we want to

we we want to also you know be Warriors

alongside of you

if that's what it was

that would be legit right but that's not

what they're saying women are saying you

men who are on the rise trying to

challenge the system that's toxic it's

toxic masculinity to be against the

world economic Forum it's toxic

masculinity to be against imperialism

it's toxic masculinity they're trying to

drag us down we're not gonna be dragged

down to the level of being a hoe

you know what I mean if you want to come

up to our level We're not gonna

We're not gonna make anything up the

fact you're a woman we don't care you're

a woman I don't give a if you're a

woman or a man you want to join in the

struggle join

but if you try to drag me down in the

name of feminine Liberation shove it up

your ass I will be a

misogynist I don't give a call me

one I don't give a you know what I

mean I will not let a feminist

woman drag me down in my war against the

status quo and that's what they're

trying to do you know that's

what they've always done

that's what they've always done

the future is not female the future is a

male

mimicking a female

honestly and what I mean by that is then

you started female no it ain't that

female

is not a female

the futurist they say the future is

female

but it's not actually real females I

hope you know that it's a it's a it's a

it's a simps version of a Gaia female

okay

you know how men have avatars of anime

women

that's what the future is female means

you people need to understand this

like you know how men when they play

Skyrim I've noticed this play as women

I've never understood this in high

school I played Skyrim a video game a

lot I always wanted to be the warrior

right

because when I was a kid it's like I

played with action figures I didn't play

with Barbies right so I didn't

understand

the men who played as women in Skyrim I

never understood that right

but then I started seeing the anime

and I'm like

that oh women women I love

the wholesomeness of women

you know what I mean

the woman represents the unlimited

enjoyment of a man

that's all it represents all of these

male feminists all these men

who are virtue signaling for women and

feminism you realize that unconsciously

the figure of the woman is their

unlimited and their own unlimited and

boundless enjoyment

the figure of the woman

is pretty much a man's

unlimited orgasm that's all it is for

these men they don't actually see they

don't actually respect women

the women they should respect are the

women who don't show themselves to them

right the women they don't know

but it's always the image of the woman

right because this is what it the male

in cell takes many forms he don't just

take the form of a guy who's mad at

women because he can't get he also

takes the form of a guy who's mad at the

patriarchy because the patriarchy is

depriving him a oh if it wasn't

for this patriarchy women would be more

open to having sex with me

that's what it is

and these feminists are enabling these

guys holy these feminists are hand

in hand enabling these washes and these

people

yes the radical feminists are doing it

too they are enabling these rabid simps

hand in hand

because of their inner they're so

narcissistic they have this intersexual

resentment that they're trans that

they're um

turning into a social narrative

I have never ever mixed my view of the

world and my politics with my personal

sexuality I haven't

if you know my history there's like no

correlation

at all

between my general views of women and

gender relations and communist Theory

and my relationship history it's like it

would make no sense to you if you try to

correlate those things because they're

completely unrelated right

and the reason they're completely

unrelated is because

I don't I don't think

those two things should be confused

right

but what I'm trying to say here really

is that you know there's also a case

there's also a case of it's pretty

prominent actually where you will find

men

who are also fixated on

women

in the in the sense that like it is just

like they blame feminism for every

manifestation

a female difference I understand that

like every time females assert their

different nature they do like oh this is

feminism's fault no it's not feminism's

fault it's just that

you're not enough at a distance

with

between your own

Psychopathology and your obligations to

other people in the world and Associates

like

trying to think of a good example of

this like

I guess um

feminine the feminine femininity

subverts and undermines every

established form of

gender relations in a sense

and the way it subverts that is that it

um

I have to explain this in like a way

that stupid people can understand

and non-laconian terms

gender difference or sexual difference

is rooted in a male phallic signifier so

the patriarch in feminist Theory will

tell you this too but it's just

like in Freud the patriarchal signifier

is the ground of is the signifier of

sexual difference right

and

that is just a pure difference so it's

how we relate to this difference that we

become gendered it's how we relate to

that fundamental difference right

and Men relate to that Difference by

um possessing that signifier themselves

but at the same time that they possess

that signifier they also castrate or

um

they also prohibit themselves from fully

realizing it because they possess it

whereas in the case of women

are the content of that signifier women

are the content of the sexual difference

itself

which means women just reflect back to

men

the basis of sexual difference itself as

far as what it actually is and lacan

calls this relation the relation of the

non-all

and

what that means is that

both feminists and anti-feminists

males right

some of them at least are wrong when

they try to attribute

female Behavior to some kind of like uh

prescribed

role

women don't have a prescribed role per

se

the female gender the roles taken on by

the female gender are not actually

duties in the same way men have duties

this role is just the content of the

sexual difference itself

that's why women

women's role confines itself to the

inner world of the family and the

meticulous detail of the home

and so on and so on things like fashion

other kinds of things

It's really because not because this is

an arbitrary arbitrarily prescribed role

oh men do this and women do that no

no there's an imminent dialectical

relationship that is responsible for why

this it's not rooted in anything

arbitrary whatsoever right

okay what do you ever what is everyone

saying in Shoku

hello

hello

hi

anyway stop spamming my chat

guys

anyway

um

basically I'll explain it this way

women's role confines itself to all of

the overlooked things

it's like women's role

is fulfilling the things inherent

to a man's role that men inherently

overlook

pretty much

it's the same it has the same object

though is what I'm trying to say it's

not an arbitrary distinction it's a

dialectical relationship that Hegel

actually does describe

but uh

I don't even think you need to bring

that up per se it's just that feminists

are going out of their way

to

um condemn and accuse

all of these differences in this reality

and boil them down to like some kind of

conspiracy of power

but then when you actually give the

feminists what they want they don't

want it

oh this is just you know what I you you

ask feminist okay then what do you want

do you want men to be like you said you

want to get rid of gender roles so does

that mean men become more like women or

do you want to become more like men and

you know what they'll say they'll say no

we just want us to be able to like mix

and match instead of having roles we

just be full human beings but you

realize that's a quintessential like

pathological fantasy right that is

trying to cope with the fundamental fact

of sexual difference you realize you're

trying to really realize a perverse

fantasy According to which

um

something that is inherently and

imminently sexuated becomes one

wholesome thing the problem is that if

we allow the feminists and entertain

them and say okay no more men and

women's roles we're just going to be

human

all living together in in a sameness of

humanity right

the content of what that is will

dialectically like a Mobius strip

even though it's the same thing

there's an inherent difference in terms

of the

how that could be possibly realized

and these different the because what

does it actually mean well there's

different possibilities well if it's all

like this is the the dialectic of um

gender relations under communism itself

was actually this like okay

men and women are the same

okay

all right we're all it's the new man men

and women are the same

and the Communists never believe this

but I'm just saying this is a paradox

that's noted by Bourgeois historians

often okay men and women are the same

okay how are we the same because there's

different possibilities for how it's the

same and then women say men and women

are the same and as a human being not a

woman not a man I love flowers I love

fashion I love homemaking I'm gonna do

this

am I not allowed to do that no we're all

human we could do whatever we want and

then men say okay well I like this

so gender differences just reassert

themselves organically

again maybe not in the exact same way

but the difference is still there just

in a new way

right

so even if you begin with okay not men

not women just human there is there are

possibilities latent in

the human right human being that is

one or the other it's just a possibility

one possibility is not better than the

other one possibility is not

metaphysically privileged over the other

it's just that

this human being cannot account by

itself for these different possibilities

you can't say no this is not human no

that's not human no they're both human

but they're different

right

and this is exactly what elides the

paranoia and accusatory world view of

feminists for them all of these

expressions of difference are these

arbitrarily discreet forms right what if

there's just one form the human being

what if there just so happens to be an

imminent tension within this singular

form of the human being that can realize

itself in one of these two possibilities

and it's simply a kind of superposition

what if it's imminent what then

right what if

sexual difference

is imminently part of the same object

it's just one of the two possibilities

by which this object realizes Itself by

saying that you want to collapse sexual

difference back into the one object and

say no we don't want men or women's

roles anymore we just want no gender

just human beings okay but

you realize that all you're going to be

doing

is re-grounding the basis of sexual

difference back into its own material uh

basis

like you not actually going to overcome

it because

men and women are not arbitrary

constructs they are dialectical

realizations of the same human object

no

foreign

culture in China

look up Ronda Rousey

all generalities are impossible because

of Ronda Rousey shut up

hello

hi can you hear me yeah

okay perfect now you um called for

people to debate you on this subject

so I actually disagree with your opinion

on women's rights women's suffrage women

holding political office in general

I agree with the Taliban

um I wanted to hear your case for

women's suffrage

uh I I don't believe it's all about have

a modern Universal state or elections a

direct elections

well when we ask them if they uh agreed

with women holding political office

um they you know took a very very strict

stance on it yeah because the Taliban is

rooted in traditional forms of tribal

power

and that's just like not it's not a

modern Universal State though it's the

foundation of one that will probably

come into existence soon but um you

understand the the Taliban cannot be

permanently

in that state because it it will

collapse back into its premises and

tribal differences in tribal Warfare so

one day it's going to hack actually have

to become a universal state of some kind

okay so how do you reconcile

um stalinism with talibanism as you

would say like stalobonism

in terms of like women's rights

it's just yeah very quick question I

don't I'm not going to take all night

um yeah I think that the Taliban are the

foundation my idea of the Taliban was

always that they're another

um they're an alternative foundation for

the universal state

and it's an alternative universality I

don't see the Taliban 's history is over

I don't see like the Taliban is like

done in terms of developing

that state right I just think that

it's the foundation for a new Universal

State that's being created by them okay

so how

compare the Iranian State when it comes

to women's rights and the Taliban I mean

whatever exists today

um Iran is a universal Republic it's an

Islamic Republic and actually the funny

thing is is that a lot of people try and

say that Communist States were extremely

feminist but it's arguable that you know

women's rights in the same sense at

least

we're also given extremely like due

consideration in the Iranian Revolution

women are very prominent in the irgc

than the police force and the morality

police women pretty much have the right

they're the most educated women in the

world they have scientific positions in

scientific research it's just the

differences of traditional gender

relations at the cultural level that

people accuse Iran of being like an

extremely um

backwards Society for but Iran and

Stalin's I mean in many ways Iran is

more women have more opportunities

in some sense in Iran than in Stalin

Soviet Union

how would you make that case to for

example like a PSL or cpusa Western

communists

um

I would basically say that they

um

I mean I don't think I would make the

case to them unless they're asking a

good faith but I think those people

don't actually

when they say we want men and women's

equality what they really just mean is

we want to be in a state of

pre-pubescence forever where we're just

pretty much children because among

adolescent children there's no real

distinction between men and women

so by just treat by just acting like

children and just um refusing to

acknowledge actual patriarchy as a real

thing that's like that's the foundation

of any party right you're not actually

achieving equality you're just in a

prepubescent stage which as you look at

the Aesthetics and the art and the um

the like uh

characteristics of Western communist

organizations it's very much this like

prepubescent cartoonish adolescent kind

of like wholesome minions communism or

whatever it doesn't actually reflect a

mature

uh relationship between adult men and

women generally it's just

prepubescence and

a lot of that has to and it is it isn't

I guess in a sense matriarchical

but matriarchy means permanent

prepubescence for men

like matriarchy corresponds to the state

of prolonged

uh adolescents or even prepubescents

where men just never become men

or ever grow up because for men to grow

up you need a man a father figure has to

be there to actually you know

allow men in lacanian terms to make the

transition from the imaginary to the

symbolic stage

so

you don't you know you don't actually

have so-called women's equality and you

know the thing is is that in historical

communist organizations quote unquote

women's equality was just this obviously

men were leading it you had a male

masculine revolutionary movement and

urge and thrust and then women were

allowed to join in you're like yeah if

you're a woman you can come you can join

in you can be a part of it but right now

we're seeing the effeminization of men

where instead of women being allowed to

join the men men are having to lower

themselves to the status of women and

that's somehow revolutionary I mean a

feminists claim that women are oppressed

right

so how did a revolutionary for men to

just join you in your oppression

so-called even they admit but it's a

woman's status to respond to what trans

ideology so I mean I've asked them this

question I asked them about women's

Liberation specifically Liberation from

one and then you know they'll pause for

a little bit and then they'll say please

keeps everything together as in you know

their rights

so uh that's my position on it and I

actually didn't expect us to agree on

this generally so I think that we should

probably set a debate up

um with you and like a rad fam or even

the Taliban I think that would be an

interesting conversation for you to have

oh and it's possible yeah I don't know

if the Taliban would be so interested in

what I have to say

uh I think they were dealing with their

own problems right now and like it

probably just confused them honestly

but um well I mean let's say questions

like women's rights and stuff you know

they talk to us they'll get into our

Twitter spaces like every day I think

the problem is that you talk you to

women's rights or they talk people talk

about women

but

those are not

that's just basically a back door for

Western ngos and uh oh absolutely you

know American Union polarity to be like

you look at the edicts of the Taliban

and it places a huge emphasis on Banning

women from working in these NGO

organizations because it's basically

trying to stop this use and

weaponization of women

buy American unipolar Imperials which is

absolutely a fact right absolutely and

when you subvert the sovereignty of the

state because absolutely sovereignty is

sexuated as male there is no sovereign

state that is matriarchical I know they

like to fantasize about a fighting

Amazon force of matriarchal women in the

jungle who are fiercely Sovereign it's

never hot it's it's not a real

thing it's a male it's

actually a male fantasy actually

it's a male fantasy because it's a

sexualized man's fantasy yes yes exactly

sovereignty is inherently you know you

know what I was going to say also is

that um

feminism it just relies upon invisible

patriarchal power they are attacking

patriarchy

they're attacking every manifestation of

patriarchy

apparent manifestation but men are still

in charge men will always be in charge

because power is inherently masculine

statehood is inherently masculine you

make an American unipolar imperialism I

mean no Kamala Harris or a like

AOC I mean that bimbo will never be in

power in actual power it's always going

to be these Shady shifting networks of

the city of London and Wall Street and

Epstein I mean that you just don't

see that's really where the real

patriarchal power is feminists don't

address it they can't address it because

it's fundamentally invisible on a

cultural phenomenological level right so

they yeah oh we're feminists see

what these old men basically do is they

appoint these to be their

representatives and they laugh at us

they're like oh yeah girl power bosses

there's some like fat old guy from the

city of London with a top hat

and a monocle sitting in a freemasonic

basement like in his conspiracy

sacrificing babies he's sitting on his

chair smoking a cigar he's

laughing hysterically as he's letting

loose his prostitutes and

to Lord over uh all these young men to

boss them around but he's the one who's

still in power you just don't know who

he is or see see him right they appoint

women to be in power to disguise the

actual basis of power right right and

that's exactly what's happening now

um you've heard about all of these

things regarding Biden they're trying to

get rid of Biden so that they can run

Michelle Obama in 2024 but I mean she

would play the same exact role AOC plays

the exact same role the entire squad for

that matter and then you know when they

call for feminism that allows for all of

this imperialism in countries like Iran

and Afghanistan and then that's why I'm

completely against Western communist

parties like the PSL and like the cpusa

even giving like a single inch to that

feminist argument because it's going to

be misused and misdirected against Iran

and Afghanistan so

we'll see what happens with that but

that's all I had to say to you guys yeah

thank you yep thanks bye

yeah as I was saying um you know you're

dealing with a situation where

uh to answer benign's question how do

you respond to what trans ideology

proponents say that sex and gender are

different what do you think of gender

identity my understanding is just

Cartesian dualism reasserted

I think it's simple I think sex is the

cause of gender gender just refers to

the cultural expression of sex

um so I don't actually think they're

different

I just think there's a discontinuity

between them but they're the same thing

it's just the discontinuous expression

of the same thing like

gender is just how sex manifests itself

culturally

and that's my view right

but um no seriously I I joke a lot I

joke a lot

I am actually being serious when I say

two things are necessary one feminism is

anti-communist feminism has no place

in a Communist Party among Communists

whatsoever and period feminism is

anti-rev it's counter-revolutionary

period right at the same time

men have to be cognizant of Their Own

psychopathologies and not to confuse

those thank you so much Chris Nancy

Pelosi had the most power in Washington

for decades because she wasn't

intelligent enough to realize she had

total power yeah

yeah thank you so much Chris

yeah

um

completely wrong account of gender

ontology so explain correct gender

ontology then

but uh as I was saying um

men need to be cognizant of Their Own

psychopathologies

because a lot of the time

um men see I always say this there's two

afflictions in the West

the Affliction of women is to become

hoes the Affliction of man is to become

porn addicts the number one Affliction

of males is the number one

Psychopathology is perversion and

pornography and these two things can

become obstacles for mature and

professional business-like political

work

because

um

I always have to take into account the

kind of like

the kind of man who's in a woman's DMS

and he's like oh hey smiley face and

then she's just kind of like ignoring

him not really paying him attention and

then he's just like coping reading too

much into it

I've seen so many cases of that and I

feel like that happens also

on an interpersonal level where Women's

indifference is taken to be some kind of

positive expression of

um

it's men and women do the same thing to

each other pretty much right when men

are indifferent women read into that

when women are indifferent Men read into

that there needs to be a way for men and

women to properly ignore each other

and

recognize that their their metabolisms

are

um

even on a Chronicle chronological level

opposing they have completely opposing

metabolisms like the direction of time

I don't care how much quantum

gobbledygook I need to justify this I

know this for a fact even the direction

of time at which the cellular process of

reproduction occurs for a man

is completely opposite to that of a

woman women literally live in the

opposite direction as men

so the space of male meaning is

completely

occupied by female indifference and a

space of female meaning is completely

occupied by male indifference

broadly speaking it's true

like yes women care about meticulous

small details men care about big broad

things I am probably not wrong when I

say the majority of the people who play

strategy games

probably men and the majority of people

or at least a the majority of women

probably play games like Animal Crossing

and The Sims where they can

fickle fiddle around with the meticulous

details of private personal life as

opposed to these broad like only men

concern themselves with the outer realm

of like broad big things

women tend to be more focused on small

things

now are there exceptions and yeah

there's always going to be exceptions

but it's a broad tendency that holds

true

now why does this hold true

um

because they're the same object it's not

that one is better than the other

it's not that one is more important than

the other by the way it's not true it's

just they're it's it's two ways of

dealing with the same exact thing right

it's two ways of dealing with the same

thing

it's not that one is better or more

important than the other they're just

dealing with different things

unironically speaking the Sultan's Harem

in the Ottoman Empire was hugely

important for how the fate of the empire

was to be decided it was like really

important there's this Trope that the

Harem is just like all the Sultans wives

and he just goes in and them

whenever he wants that's kind of a Trope

the harem was just the house of women

a lot of intrigue and Court Intrigue and

like all the stuff relating to family

that was very very political and

important it wasn't fighting on the

battlefield with swords and and

conquering vast territories but there

was still like a really fundamental

reality going on there right

so

yeah I mean um

I'm not using these examples to say this

is like

necessary difference

so if there's a deviation from that Norm

it's a problem I'm just trying to give

people an idea of

what is so irreducible about the

difference between men and women it's

just not something you're ever going to

be able to overcome

Communist States again did not really

give any

ideological or political recognition of

to femininity except beginning in the

Stalin period

where the role of motherhood began to be

important

and um

you know things like that but

that was a supposed step back from the

feminism of the 20s the hardcore

feminism it wasn't feminism it was

actually menanism that was inclusive to

women

see

communist equality equality to women is

actually meninist not feminist I like

that

communism women's rights is meninist

women can do the things men do and we're

going to treat you like men

but when it comes to like the meticulous

female resentments and needs

it was pretty much like oh who gives a

right nobody cares

women's issues

uh and so in Soviet times

we're not taking that

the women's domestic complaints and

resentments and issues did not really

receive the attention of the highest

levels of power throughout the Soviet

period the same could also be said about

um

about the uh

about China and the and the cultural

revolution in China again women's issues

were seen as like meticulous but what

were women's issues right the specific

specific micro micro resentments and

aggressions this nobody gave a

about this right it's really this

broad attempt to allow women to be equal

to men

at the level of male roles

that defined what Women's Rights was in

Communist States women can pick up the

gun and fight women can be Steel Workers

women yeah sure women can do all these

things you can if you don't end up doing

that it's not a conspiracy but you have

the opportunity to

but when it comes to effeminization

Communist States

we're very much against a femininity I

once told my mother that no women lived

in the Vatican then she told me then who

does the cooking and the cleaning and

the laundry

thank you Patriot

um what I'm trying to say here is that

femininity was given was Allah accepted

in Communist States

but that was not feministically not in a

feministic way like it wasn't like

yeah men should be

rearing the kids and no no no women

it was seen as the woman's job

to do the child rearing and all that

kind of stuff mainly

still a woman's role

femininity was respected

but it was not

not in a feminist way is what I'm trying

to say it was still like based in

traditional gender roles like for

example

uh from 17 moments in Soviet history

uh

in 1954 the year saw many elements of

the reinforcement of traditional gender

roles prominent for the last 20 years

femininity as a specific set of

behaviors centered around home and

family was reinforced by new

opportunities in the consumer economy

women can now pretty up their apartments

or even themselves buy a visit to the

department store or a local hairdresser

Role Models such as the housewife or

school teacher started as the foundation

for gender differentiation

for example right so

um

what what should be a takeaway of this

stream guys should you start treating

women differently on a social and

political level no

no

you shouldn't

just don't treat them differently it's

like it doesn't I don't who gender

doesn't matter right

but

just because

it needs to be understood that the

Revolutionary impulse that's a man's

impulse that's going to come from your

soul

you have to be a man the same

that Andrew Tate is provoking and

young men that's where the Revolutionary

flame comes from okay

um

being a revolutionary means

to radically emancipate yourself

from any form of socialization

sorry any established form of

institutional socialization

it means to cut the

and deal with reality as it is not as it

should socially be

um see the thing is is that there was

this maybe maybe you could say that okay

Communists wanted men and women to be

the same

they thought that by economically making

women equal to men

that would um

make air all the other super structural

phenomenal and cultural differences

Superfluous and gone

okay but that's not what happened at the

level of the base men and women were

equal the economic base they were

treated equally

but super structurally and culturally

they were different and Communists

didn't see that as a problem now

in 2023 he we have feminists who say

that cultural differences between men

and women are a problem

again Communists were not addressing

cultural differences they were

addressing

realities

they were addressing economic realities

and political realities they were

addressing

um

violations of the humanity of women

they were addressing like you know them

being sold off at a young age and so on

and so forth they were not addressing

um

the fact that culturally men and women

are different were that men are men and

that that is uh

somehow making you feel uneasy when it

comes to your overly socialized overly

feminized ass like

the basis of communist power was in the

gun

in enviraja Albania everyone had guns in

Mao's China

it was based in the PLA and the Soviet

Union was the same thing

especially after the post-war period but

even before it was militancy based on

something phallic and masculine

that was and it would these were these

were Andrew Tate countries

oh do you mean Andrew take the sex

trafficker no I just mean the toxic

masculinity that you associate with

Andrew Tate where oh my God all these

men are um

starting to not be simp again

that's what it was

it was it was no place for

period it was no place for little

ass people period it was no place for uh

scrawny little ass

oh hi guys

I I love women's rights

women's equality Mouse head women hold

up half the sky

Mouse and women on them have the sky and

that's why Baristas are the

revolutionaries

shut up

it's like Mouse talking about

foot binding and like he's talking about

literal prostitution and brothels and

slavery and these women are being sold

for rice paddies and and

you're no what he actually meant is that

no you know what this is what these uh

people are imagining they're imagining

that Mao was talking about this like

female anime protagonist I'm going to

tell you another quintessential incel

fantasy so

the incel often fantasizes about a

patriarchal father who is prohibiting

them from achieving full sexual access

basically the patriarch is preventing me

from getting

so oftentimes they will fantasize about

a female anime cartoon protagonist with

a weapon and sword ha

and she's gonna fight and take down the

patriarch but they've projected that

onto um

posters of communist women with guns but

it's the same it serves the same

function like the man is an incel he

sees the patriarch is preventing him

from all the women that he wants

to

and he deploys a female anime kind of

Avatar as this vessel like a Skyrim

character pretty much representing

unlimited Jewish songs unlimited

enjoyment unlimited

um full full presence for a full phallic

presence of Desire it's the actual

um

Paradox which is why you know you get

things like femme boys and all this

other stuff I'm not going to mention

because paradoxically

um

paradoxically uh it's it's a form of the

fetishes to survival like

the anime female protagonist that these

incels project as women's rights

paradoxically represents a full phallic

presence

that is undifferentiated by any

castration any symbolic castration so

the ultimate quintessential figure

is a female anime protagonist for for a

leftist pervert man the quintessential

heroic

figure they project their inner in

seldom onto is a female anime

protagonist

who happens to also have something

swinging down there

if you catch my drift

but that is the figure of the Divine

absolute for them like that is

literally to them that's a god

that's literally what they see as a god

I'm not kidding when I say this I'm

this is what my impersonal

laconian psychoanalysis leads me to the

conclusion of and I'm pretty sure

this actually aligns with what most of

you have seen

you know

uh in reality

because the basic idea is that

the phallic Master signifier

uh paradoxically

gives men both The Possession

of the object of Jewish songs but also

castrates them so that they can't have

all of it

right

so there's no it's not a full phallic uh

possession it's a possession that's

paradoxically is responsible for

castration

so castration gives men as much as it

takes right but then this leads to the

perverse fantasy of acquiring the full

phallic presence well femininity

revolves around

the lack

that is inherent in the master signifier

right

um paradoxically this also means women

is non-all women is the content of the

phallic signifier so in a man's fantasy

women represent the full presence of a

phallic signifier

undifferentiated by uh castration Let's

do an intro to lecon stream soon I'll

carry the entire Dono burden if I have

to thank you so much ABC mind appreciate

you I should do that I want to do a

proper introduction

but um

so the reason why you're seeing a lot of

female protagonists in movies

has nothing to do with any elevated

status of women

it has more to do with the fact that men

project their own fantasies of

undifferentiated access to full sexual

enjoyment

on to women

women kind of represent this like

boundless

you know this boundlessness of male

desire

and that's why women are becoming the

protagonists of all of these movies and

TV shows and it's being passed off as a

form of female empowerment it's not

um

I guess women are making a living off of

this pornographic uh derangement with

only fans and stuff because it is as

part of the pathos of pornography that's

what pornography is actually about

the only way women are being empowered

by these like

um

these new heroic roles

is uh pornography is becoming more

lucrative I guess

uh but there's no it's not it's not

empowering in any it's not like uh you

know for example how many women

are scientists in America compared to

Iran

yeah I think Iran's women are

I think America I think Iran even

um

okay I want to explain to you something

crazy okay

check this out for example you want to

talk about women's empowerment thank you

so much and on

I was wondering what are your thoughts

on the condemnation of the Red Army by

Western feminist so-called Communists

they claim Stalin encouraged the Red

Army to sexually and violently attack

Germans

it adds more Credence to the fact that

feminism is a form of anarchism an

anarchism is a Hitler is is um Hitler

was an anarchist

feminism

is an inherently Hitler right

ideology I hope everyone knows the

feminazi thing is not just a joke it's

literally true

[Music]

um

Fascism and Nazism

treats the nation the same way like

national socialism pretty much is the

same thing as feminist socialism like

the reification of the nation and the

reification of femininity

follows the same logical structure and

the same conclusion

yes feminism is a form of Nazism

I think that should be strongly

emphasized going forward feminism is

inherently racist

it's inherently uh genocidal and yes it

is inherently fascistic

yes feminism is fascist thank you so

much Komodo dragon vs Tiger who are you

betting on

okay

in Iran

seventy percent of University graduates

in stem fields are women

in United States women are vastly

underrepresented in stem fields

so you want to talk about uh ways in

which gender roles are subverted

paradoxically you find this in Iran 70

percent

of

the people graduating stem fields are

women and Iran is a severely traditional

gender role culture

so I think you know in many respects

Iran surpasses even socialist or

Communist States

when it comes to the ability for women

to realize their human latent abilities

but I I kind of feel like

uh having 70 of your stem graduates

being women I kind of feel like that's

more empowering than being a cam

but maybe I'm just a little bigoted and

patriarchal and sexist but I I suspect

that women

who acquire expertise in

science medicine technology mathematics

and Engineering I suspect

that that's a little bit more empowering

than

um taking a photo of your and

putting it on the internet for money

I but I could be wrong

that could just be my patriarchal sexist

programming

I could just have that inherent

patriarchal sexist

you know programming but I kind of feel

like

there's something true about how that is

the case but maybe that's just maybe I

just want to keep women down you know

maybe that's what this is maybe I just

want to keep women down and prevent them

from being empowered who knows

who knows

right

yeah I'm basically trying to um

foreign

you can't really this stream is kind of

go it's gonna like go over the head of

um stupid people and well leftist

specifically because ultimately what

they're going to say is that Haas what

about the role women play

in revolutions or in the military

again things that were never called into

question or denied

ever it's just that today you're seeing

a stunning lack of the masculine

Foundation but in Western countries at

least first medalist Miriam mercani was

Iranian yeah exactly right again all

people are going to respond to this by

saying is Haas you're underplaying the

role women played in historical

revolutions

no I'm not I'm emphasizing the fact that

all of those roles women played rested

Atop A firm masculine revolutionary

foundation and we're not for that

Foundation

those roles would have not existed those

new roles by women would have not been

possible nor existed

and what you see in the west today is a

stunning lack of masculinity on the part

of male Communists a bunch of cuckolds

in the west they do

everything they need to get more women

in stem cheaper schools Etc but women

aren't interested how do you explain

that

yeah because

um

I must be the patriarchy right

yeah I know you're right East you're

right

there's a lot of reasons right it's just

that I'm not saying gender relations

can't even change

I'm just saying they don't change

according to differences

um

they don't change according to uh

sorry according to

um

the liberal Anarchist impulse to

paranoically contrive every

manifestation of differences as a form

of political Injustice

they change according to an organic

a development of the interaction between

men and women

again

every depiction of femininity in the

USSR was gendered statues of women in

the USSR typically depicted them as

Coco's women as opposed to the

industrial male worker

these are facts it was gendered now

we're both men and women seen as

powerful yes of course but not in the

same way right the Soviet powerful woman

was not a girl boss she literally

represented the motherland itself she

represented the power not only of the um

institutional State that's male coded

represented the power of the

sociological people which is why they

were often dressed as peasants

um

it's almost as as trying to say

that the Statue of Liberty

and other statues of women in the West

Olympia or whatever I don't know that's

somehow a tribute to feminism and female

empowerment it's not

it's not and in the USSR especially the

statues of women

were not

always tributes

to

um

individual women specifically but we're

using women as a kind of symbol for

something else like the Statue of

Liberty

but I mean regardless

people people are just gonna

like for No One's Gonna actually listen

to what I said I guarantee you guys

because people are they're

gonna try and draw the conclusion of

haza saying women play no significant

role in revolutions

and in in uh socialist history or in war

and Haas is the denying pavlichen who

exists I'm sorry you are like I

can't help you like you're actually just

stupid

there's nothing that can be done to help

you you are arguing with a straw man

because you are a fundamentally stupid

person you're a stupid and inept person

who is avoiding confrontation with your

own Low T

self like you are just a low-t

who's trying to make excuses by hiding

behind women for the sorry state of your

masculinity like there's nothing I can

do to help you no one has ever called

into question the role women played in

revolutions it's just that people have

somehow forgotten the fact that

regardless of these roles these

revolutions were still primarily

masculine primarily led by men and yes

masculine femininity is the uh is not

something that can be given any formal

status as far as uh political cause is

concerned

foreign

I want to give you an example of a dumb

right now because I'm looking at just

look at this guys just look at this

does this make anyone else depressed

does this make anyone depressed so look

at the tweet I made

I will lay to rest the misconception

that women's rights under communism many

of you with feminism and the absolutely

essential role of men throughout every

revolution in history

if you search

this thing you guys are into

instances the Communist position on

women's importance Revolution is pretty

unanimous

foreign

how do you

how do you explain to this that I

didn't actually mention women I just

said that men play an essential role

I say men

the absolutely essential role of men

throughout every revolution in history

and this funky to disprove what I

say cites literal men yeah the reason

you're citing Lenin Mao and Castro I

mean those were men you idiot

you're like overlooking the fact with no

self-awareness that these are men

by the way nobody nobody called into

question women's importance to

Revolution I'm just emphasizing the

essential role of men something you're

literally denying and overlooking

but you you it's like it's like there's

NPCs you it's like you can't communicate

this stuff you can't just

communicate to them okay women play an

important role but fun men play a

fundamental role okay in every

revolution in history

no but what about what about where was

the Luxembourg has

you don't even in Rosa luxembourg's

failed Revolution you don't think Men

played a fundamental role

are you stupid

and when I say men play a fundamental

role I don't just mean men are just

involved I mean like the male

instinctual impulse

to overthrow power and to seize power

like that is so important

right that militancy oh man women can be

militant too okay fine but men is the

manhood is defined by that

women I can do anything men can do but

better okay but that's what men can do

that's what defines manhood I don't care

if women can do it too that's what

manhood is women are women and they can

also do some things men can do fine but

that's not all women are all that's all

manhood is it's that's what defines it

holy

it's like so stupid I was like

it never ceases to piss me off like it's

it's like

yeah please please

yeah please tell me more about how Mao

said women hold up half the sky

please please tell me Mao

hapath the sky so brave

so brave so brave

post the quotes

Jezebel magazine I'm not gonna respond

to this it's like but

it's like a so brave

you're so like making a point right now

it's like this thing is like battered

into our every day you go on

Twitter and you see oh Thomas Sankara on

women's rights every day

it's not in dispute nobody's ever

disputed that it's like a given but what

seems to be in dispute is the fact that

yeah men play a fundamental role in

revolutions why the is that under

dispute the

there is no successful revolution in

history that was led by women people

literally use Mao's wife

as an example

Mao's wife as an example of

revolutionary female leadership

Mao's wife

it's a joke

I'm not even saying Mao's wife didn't

play an important role but it was still

Mao's wife okay there's no Mao's wife

without Mao period people have no it's

they're they are literally

using patriarchical authorities to

disprove what I'm saying that yeah it's

far it's rooted in patriarchy now just

look at what this patriarch said and you

have no self-awareness none

stupid

man it's stupid

damn

foreign

foreign

a lot of people think there's hysteria

on racial stuff there's not

but from the very beginning that I

started streaming

there's always been Hysteria

when it comes to gender if I say

something like men are stronger than

women has wants to enslave women

and hus

believes in beheading women who dare

speak in public why is there such like a

knee-jerk projection

impulse of bad faith

whenever I say anything about the

differences between men and women maybe

it's because people are racist

and I'm an Arab guy with a beard

who has a mascot who has extremely

masculine

and people just project their own psycho

fantasies on me like if I say some

like

in a fight all things equal a man will

win

[Music]

yeah

eyes believes that women

are the same as cattle

can you actually quote me on something I

said to justify that you

again it's a male in seldom that sees

the patriarch as prohibiting them from

accessing the the female sex that's all

it is

that's all it is

you know what's prohibiting women from

not being able to get married and men

from being unable to even talk to women

the fact that men and women are not

taught

how to mutually recognize their

differences

and expect those differences rather than

Channel them into forms of resentment

that's why

foreign

it's always that bad faith you know

that's really what it is

bad faith people are just satanists

they're just scum all of them not just

feminists anarchists all of them they're

all scum

they I there's nothing you can do right

they're always gonna

you say you like pancakes oh you hate

waffles you hate waffles

you know what I mean

you know what I mean you say one thing

you didn't say about that has

you're denying you're denying the role

women playing revolutions no I'm not I

never denied that

I didn't deny that

that's why I started to be like it

I started to be edgy I'm just like

I don't give a yeah I'm right yeah

I am sexist I'm misogynist and you know

what on a personal level I am I'm sorry

I am on a personal level yeah

it I am I'm definitely sexist on

personal level are you kidding

I'm just saying if I'm the chairman of a

party I'm gonna just like in my Discord

just like anywhere I'm gonna enforce

formal gender equality but like on a

personal level

I'm not gonna be in an equal

relationship with someone the

right but those are two different things

hmm

but you know my experience is guys

for some odd reason and this is what

incels

woke in cells hate here

for some odd reason women just seem

happier

and they seem to really like it when I'm

like

when I'm so sexist in person I don't

know it's just so crazy you know

I don't know man it's just that's

probably every single every single

relationship I've ever been in

every single one

I have never met a woman who wanted a

male feminist in my life

in my whole life I've never I've never

come across it in my whole life

ever

ever

I've never thank you so much Christmas I

appreciate you establishment figured out

that if leftism is identified with the

feminine you get another great way for

finance reindeer to dominate production

exactly holy you're right

yeah feminine yeah leftism America's

feminine the right wing is masculine

anyone who denies that as a liar

you're a lying If you deny that

that is literally how these things are

coded in the U.S

I wish I could talk about more

I would do it on Rumble mental illness

plays a big role in this

I'm part of men

no I will not elaborate

um it does though a really big one

foreign

female in cells justify their ideology

and social terms this is a societal

Injustice male in cells straight up say

I'm mad because I can't get

or the patriarch is preventing me from

getting that's another version of

insult them two sides of the same coin

it's the same

so basically I want to broadly release

an edict saying that um

both men who are mad they can't get

and females who are upset they

can't get a man you have no place in the

infrared Community we don't want any of

that sexual resentment

ass we don't I don't want

sexually resentful people

around me I don't want you around me I

don't want your negativity you know

there's so many women who have a problem

with me

when they find out I'm with another

woman you ever I always I always make so

many political enemies of women online

whenever it's discovered

that uh I'm with another woman and not

them

there's they're so nice to me until they

find out I I decided to be with a

different woman than them then I'm a

enemy and they have to attack me

I don't give a that's incel

that's femcel right

same

same as always been the case

always been the case

holy that is so true like

that is so true for the whole two years

I've been streaming that's been true for

the entire two years I've been streaming

it's been true

holy

because the other party is consenting to

the inequality why doesn't person

reflect General it's kind of like that

E2 because it's a personal relationship

the relation is between two people

whereas the relationship of a collective

Institution

to society is a relationship between one

and all so the reason there should be

formal equality between men and women is

because the relationship we have to the

state is between the state and all of us

whereas in a

um

personal relationship that's between you

and another person that's a relationship

founded on Mutual Trust

the problem with feminism is that

oftentimes

they try to

ground personal relationships in a

politics and metaphysics of distrust

making the relationship impossible

but I don't think that's really the case

because most of the time feminists don't

get picked like

there's no man who even wants to enter

into a relationship with them

and that's the causes belly of their

feminism a lot of the time right like

they just are not getting chosen

so

you know

what do I mean by chosen by a man I'm

not saying there's not men in their DMS

simping for them and trying to get with

them I'm saying like there's no

masculine presence in their life

so you know

that's what they call anti-feminist

women pick me

yeah it is because they're just not

getting picked

it's that simple like

and I'm not telling feminists oh yeah

you'll get picked if you stop being a

feminist I'm gonna tell you the cold

hard black pill truth you're probably

not getting picked

because you are not a high quality

female simple if you want to settle for

like a low value male you probably can

you probably can but you don't want that

you want a completely high quality man

you want like the best of the best type

of guy you want like a dude who ticks

all the boxes and he's and you don't get

that but you yourself are a four out of

ten so you become a feminist sorry that

ain't how I work

but one of them is praised as powerful

and bold and then when men do it it's

their incels but when women do the same

you know what I mean

you know what I mean

damn what a joke

all right

that's really the the thrust of today's

stream honestly great stream yeah

great stream I'll see you guys tomorrow

see y'all tomorrow

see you guys tomorrow

all right see you guys tomorrow bye