War

Fuck is up, y'all.

What's going on?

Holy shit.

What the fuck?

Australia Stanny with the 15.

What's up, bro?

How are we doing?

Midnight with the one what's up bro Tanky Tom with the one what's up bro Kami Vegan with the five what is up Cosmic Marxist with the twenty what the hell what's up bro

As I told y'all, we got the infrared renaissance.

Met, what's up, bro?

I told y'all about that infrared renaissance.

The next thing we're going to be doing, once we get the ACP merch settled, I'm going to do the infrared merch, right?

And we're gonna get that shit settled.

I'm gonna have Astra design that hat I wanted to design since it can do so much.

What up, Matt?

How are we doing?

Fuck is up, y'all.

How are we doing today?

We got a lot of shit to go over.

We got a lot of shit to talk about.

So as y'all know

Video, by the way, on YouTube, that's the best video on the history of the Haas channel.

And right now, as you can see, that video, and you may not fucking believe this shit because it's so crazy.

That video is the number, the 79th most hyped video on YouTube right now.

Meaning it is the most, the 79th most hyped YouTube video.

That's the guerrilla army because even PewDiePie, even Mr.

Beast does not have a guerrilla army that will actually use those hype points.

Even they don't have that type of loyalty.

Even they don't have that type of collective power movement sweeping high fucking energy.

Even Marquise Brownie don't have that shit.

Marquise Brownie don't have that shit.

Marquise Brownie's got the latest phones and shit.

He's got the iPhone 19.

He's got the iPhone 21.

He's got the Android 65.

He's got the iPad 25.

He's got the latest headphones.

He's got the latest touchpad.

He got the Apple Pro Vision Max 2345 negative 26.

He got all that shit.

He still does not have the Guerrilla Army though.

He still does not have the guerrilla army though.

He still does not have the guerrilla army, though.

You know what I mean?

That's the type of shit we're on: Infrared Renaissance type of shit.

We're mobbing it up.

We're mobbing it up.

We're walking out.

We're walking.

We're taking over the sidewalks, the street.

We're mobbing in this bitch.

Number 79 on YouTube.

Everybody, get the fuck out of our way.

I'm literally, I got a fucking video.

Y'all are gonna think I'm a bullshitter.

I got a video that is so good, okay, that I've been working on.

It is so good, it's literally art, and I'm not even gonna release it till next week so y'all hype points can reset.

We're gonna get this to the top trending video on YouTube.

This is gonna be a deck, an artistic manifesto type of video.

Now, this video is it's already done by the way.

That's the power of Claude Opus 5.5.

I've been kind of moving a little bit away from Astra recently because Astra is kind of becoming retarded.

When it comes to that motion design shit and Claude Opus 5.5, I mean, I got I'm using all this money you guys are sending me.

I got the $200 a month subscription to Claude to use Opus 5.5, and that is actually what made that animated video you saw.

So you could say that video cost $200.

But I have, there's so much more shit I'm making with it.

It's such a good fucking investment.

Okay.

I told y'all the infrared renaissance is happening one way or a fucking other.

But somehow this AI boom has changed everything.

And it's like, I feel like we're coming on to nuclear war and World War III because now you can have Minecraft in Skyrim.

Now you can have Call of Duty and Skate 3 in the same game session.

Because the thing going on, I don't know if you guys are seeing this shit.

Frightful, what's up?

This feels like satanic.

It feels like this is too much.

It feels like this is too satanic.

It's like a magic genie that gives us whatever the fuck we want.

You guys are underutilizing the fuck out of this shit.

I'm just telling you that.

Anything you can imagine that has anything to do with something that can be on a computer screen.

Anything you can imagine that can be done with computers on the internet, you can fucking do it.

With a few prompts.

It's possible.

It's not just images.

It's not just video.

It's not just movies.

It's not just video games.

It's literally anything you can fucking think of.

I'm going to give an official order.

Okay.

Everybody in the American Communist Party and in the guerrilla army, you need to be minimally acquainted with how to use AI.

Because we are.

Why are we not making raking in millions of dollars right now?

I have no fucking idea.

It has never in history been this piss easy to fucking be on top.

Red, what's up?

And you want to know why we're retarded for not using it way more aggressively than we are?

We literally have the ultimate advantage.

Hakeem cannot use AI.

None of our rivals can use AI.

Are you guys stupid?

None of the competition is allowed to use AI.

They literally cuck themselves and castrate themselves with a fucking no AI prohibition.

That's literally like your enemies saying we're not going to use nukes.

They're literally castrating themselves for free.

And you guys are not fucking lapping them right now.

Accelerate, bitch!

Don't even think about that shit.

Don't let the comments bother you on Instagram.

They're all crazy.

Who gives a fuck about these people?

Blow them out the fucking water.

We're in it to win it.

Accelerate to the fucking finish line at all costs.

That is a fucking order.

That has always been the fucking order.

Accelerate to the fucking finish line.

That's the fucking our morality is victory.

Our morality is the fucking finish line, Sonic the Hedgehog type of shit.

We're gonna get there faster and more aggressively.

We're gonna pump out more volume.

We're not gonna fucking stop.

Even bullets won't stop us, bitch.

I'm gonna put Astra on an iPad, put it on my chest, and that shit will take bullets right now.

I'm gonna have an Astra plated armor, and the AI is gonna catch the bullets midair.

Throw that shit back.

We have the fucking ultimate advantage right now.

You guys have no fucking idea.

We could literally, it's like Neo in the fucking Matrix right now.

This is literally the ultimate dimension of cyber warfare.

You guys are fucking underutilizing the fuck out of it.

And I gotta tell y'all, some y'all are retarded.

We gotta talk about that.

Some y'all are straight up retarded.

Cause y'all have it so easy right now, and you're struggling with the prompts, which means you guys don't even have the imagination to know what the fuck you want.

It's like it's not that y'all, you have no excuses now.

Anything can be easily done, but some of y'all are just like, oh, I don't know how to you're lazy, you're that lazy you don't want to prompt it.

You know what I mean?

We're going to talk about this too.

This is the crisis of people having no taste, okay?

And I want to be really fucking mean about it.

I want to be really fucking mean about it.

Because I'm going to tell you, you know, when my heart breaks.

Every time I see retarded-ass people find happiness, I'm like, you didn't earn that shit.

They're like, this is beautiful.

Man, that shit is ugly.

You are, you have no right to be in peace with whatever peace you have found.

Whatever story you're telling yourself, whatever way you cope with existence, most of the time it's so stupid and ugly.

And it's like, y'all are not putting yourselves through enough pain psychologically.

And you're finding these shortcuts.

It's like when you're writing a story and you're like, and there one time there was a fat guy, and he just got pie and he ate the pie and he went on his merry day.

That's a fucking ugly narrative.

All right.

Some of y'all, your worldview is anchored in these retarded, ugly narratives.

And you need to actually think through what is the struggle of life.

Make a fucking story about a fat guy who's been eating pie all day.

The fat guy's been eating pie all day for weeks, for months, for years.

That's all he does is he eats pie.

Okay?

Then one day when he was going into the cabinet to find some pie, there was nothing left.

And he got so upset.

Where's my pie?

Where's my pie?

So he goes to the grocery store.

There's no more pie on the shelf either.

He says, Where's my pie?

Where's my pie?

Finally, he goes outside.

And he realizes something.

The food supply has been cut.

All the farms have been burned and poisoned.

And now there's a food crisis in the country.

Then the fat guy says, I need my pie.

I need it.

I need it.

So he gets on a boat.

And he goes to Mexico and he's like, Y'all got some Mexican pies?

And they said, No, we got the food crisis here.

So he travels all around the world in search of pie.

And he's on this long journey, and there's oceans and crashing waves, and he's risking his life.

And then he's in the middle of the Sahara desert, and he screams out on top of his lungs to the sky, screaming to God, Where's the pie?

All right, Rabbi, what's up?

And then suddenly it rains for the first time in the history of the Sahara.

This guy has been dehydrated and starving his whole life.

And then he looks into the ground and he realized something.

While he was focused on the pie, he was starving because he wouldn't eat any other food because he's that picky.

While he was focused on the pie, he was dehydrated.

He was about to collapse and die.

And he started raining.

He goes on the floor.

He gets the water.

He cleans his face.

He's like, I don't need pie anymore.

It's a miracle.

I'm glad to be alive.

I'm grateful.

Like, just, I just, just make a beautiful story.

Make something that actually has a plot.

Make something that means something.

All right.

Gerald.

So I just pulled that shit out of my ass.

But I sometimes gorillas, the story that they'll make is there's a guy who you guys don't understand.

It's got to be a narrative arc.

There's got to be ups and downs.

Yeah, everything in equal ratios of black and white.

Good and evil as well.

The evil within.

All the same ratio of good and evil exists in every single person.

You only acquire perfection when you finally nail the fuck down.

The yin and the yang.

When you don't do that shit and you make a fantasy of just one thing or the other.

You that's wholesome chungus, and that's for fat people.

Okay, it's ugly, it's hideous, and it's not the way.

Every time you develop an aesthetic, you develop a sensibility, you develop any kind of taste, you have to ask yourself one simple question: Does this complete the narrative arc of the universe?

Because if it does not.

Need to stop before you produce something monstrous and hideous.

All right?

And some of y'all don't know what the fuck I'm talking about?

But

The right peop We literally reached the goal, two hundred and forty three out of tw twelve thirty six Round of applause for the guerrilla army that is hyper fucking activated 'cause we're in the big fucking leaves now, number seventy ninth on YouTube.

You call us number 79.

We're going to become Mr.

Beast soon.

Infrared has the ambition of Mr.

Beast.

Infrared has the ambition of Marquise Brownie.

One day, Marquise Brownie will be like, damn, I wish I had as much subs as infrared.

One day, Marquise Brownie will realize he can't even get the latest infrared products.

One day, Sabine Hausenfender will realize that she should have become a Lysenkoist because she is getting outmoded and outclassed by infrared lectures and educational content.

Everyone needs to fucking understand what's going on.

Wake the fuck up.

The infrared coin is literally blowing the fuck up.

Number 48 top hourly gifted on kick.

We blow every community out of the fucking water.

We dominate full spectrum fucking dominance.

That's what this people don't understand it.

This is the Red Army.

This is full spectrum fucking dominance.

Oh, you don't have a lot of Yeah, we're a bunch of lions.

We're not a bunch of cattle.

We are the most amount of lions concentrated in one fucking area.

We don't have the size.

Of some of these other communities, but they are cattle and we are lions.

That's the fucking difference.

And we are growing very rapidly, very speedily.

The only thing this army needs is hand sanitizer.

The only thing some of y'all need now is deodorant and soap.

And I promise we will be the most powerful force in the world.

Get that deodorant, get that soap, wash those hands, make sure they are dry before you shake mine.

And I promise you, we will lap and conquer the fucking world.

That's the last thing you have to do between us and conquest.

Stop smelling bad, clean up your shit, do not live in filth, live in cleanliness, be clean.

We're going to have some Islamic standards in this bitch.

Some of y'all, I don't like the Islam thing.

It's exactly the type of people that need Sharia law the most because Islamic cleanliness is what we need.

Islamic standard of cleanliness, okay?

Everybody get bidets, everybody get deodorant, everybody

Everybody be clean.

You know how bring a tear to my eye.

The neg when we have the National Congress.

If all the gorillas s uh aren't smelly and you guys wash your hands and shit, y'all are clean as fuck, I swear there'd be a tear to my eye.

A tear will fall on my eye, and I'll be like, Damn, we come so far.

We come so far, we finally are the community we needed to be.

That's how I'll be, I have tears of joy.

We have to have one person with deodorant axe spray or old spice walking around, making sure the chairman is sufficiently not de-spirited and moralized.

Because that's the type of shit we have to be on.

I literally just left the gym there.

I walked by somewhere, literally smelled like an actual someone literally dropped a bomb of shit somewhere, and I left out of anger.

Okay.

So you need to understand.

You can't just be bombing the world with having a bad smell.

All right.

Everybody gotta wash their hands, everybody gotta have soap, everybody gotta have deodorant, everybody gotta be clean as fuck.

And it's you know I say the clean as fuck, we gotta be clean, we gotta be clean like the US military machine.

'Cause if we're not as clean as the US military machine,

We're gonna be just another victim.

If we're not as clean and effective and efficient as the US military machine,

We're gonna be on some shit that is of the receiving end of an FBI operation to cause havoc and wreck us, which is what they're doing right now.

But the people who are behind that type of shit, that's some dirty Dan type of shit.

Those are some dirty Dan ass people.

Some dirty, smelly, nasty ass, obese, disgusting people are behind that shit.

And we cannot wait to expose them to the world.

We're just waiting for the snakes to show themselves.

Anyway, y'all.

There's about I'm getting more into the theme of what I'm trying to say here.

Everything is going too good and too well.

It's like there's an FBI operation coming down, or there's a fucking war coming, but karmically, there's too many beautiful, bountiful, just beautiful things happening in terms of AI.

And every single video that I make now, each one is getting better than the last one.

And I just made one within one day.

Probably the best, most exhilarating, like top best content ever made by Infrared.

I just made it within a day, and I'm probably gonna upload it to the main channel because it is original content.

It's not from a stream, it's not a stream edit, right.

Mm-hmm.

But we're gonna see 'cause I'm grinding the fuck out of that hoss channel.

And it's like

We have it so easy right now.

But my fear, I want to say shout out to IGG Kizelbosh Jensen.

Jensen has been making the best thumbnails, some of the best thumbnails out of all clippers.

Jensen's got the template.

The one released today, not the best, that thumbnail.

But those thumbnails he's been doing, and his shit has been popping off and growing because those thumbnails are fucking A-plus.

And the infrared clippers are on the rise, the movement is on the rise, we've never been we are looking at a 2020 I think blackouts are coming before 2027, but if they don't we're gonna lap the year, we're gonna own 2026, we're gonna have ACP after our National Congress be more powerful than it has ever been in its history because big moves are fucking happening that you guys don't even fucking know about.

Infrared Collective forms in twenty seventeen, well guess what?

This shit is coalescing, okay?

Infrared, Midwestern Marks, RTSG.

We are Jackson, we are.

fusing together.

into a spherical way.

Okay?

And there's a Renaissance in the air.

Carlos is one of the great intellects of this Renaissance.

There's a renaissance in the air.

It's coming.

Okay?

It's already here.

We got Volk Vulture.

Literally got all the facts on lock.

Okay.

So I don't know if you guys saw this shit.

Some stupid ass shit.

Okay?

So Bouncy Ben tried to confront an ACP reserve member in Texas with his bullshit schizo retard attack on Stalin.

He's trying to say that Stalin was a pedo and that he's got new data to confirm it 'cause this uh

The son of Stalin's alleged illegitimate son was born in August of 2017 or something, right?

The problem is, according to his own fucking source, Stalin would have had to have been in the village that she's from, that she lived in, in December of 1916.

But he left in October.

At minimum, he left in October.

He wasn't there after October.

We all know that.

Okay?

So his whole thing is based on jumbled nonsense, zero facts, all bullshit, created by anti communist scum trying to deflect and make shit up.

But he yeah he he confronted some some uh reserve member in Texas.

The reserve member in Texas was just not interested in what he was saying.

And he was pressing this guy, he was like, Oh, oh, Eddie Liger is is best friends with Scott Ritter?

Mind you, Scott Ritter goes on Midwestern marks one time or something, and they didn't do a full background.

I don't even know what the story with fucking Scott Red.

My problem with Scott Ritter, I don't know his whole story.

My problem with him is he makes shit up and he's one of the biggest liars in the world.

And it's not, I don't know if he does it on purpose, but he's one of the biggest bullshitters.

That guy just makes shit up all the time.

So I don't know what's going on with that, but this whole guilt by association nonsense is pathetic.

It's absolutely fuck especially if you're in a libertarian or ANCAP community, you're gonna start trying to be guilt by association.

When you're frolicking in that community, mind you, this is a guy who's not even innocent himself.

He's guilty of shit himself, by the way.

The accusations against Stalin, they had the DNA test, DNA taste was fake.

The lie that the KGB agreed.

Bullshit.

KGB did not interview anyone.

Complete made-up bullshit.

The anti-communist scum have nothing on Stalin, on Mao, on Lenin.

And how do I know this?

Cause they make shit up about me, these scum, these feds, whoever the fuck about me, about people I know, they make about Jackson, they make things up about him.

Hundred years from now historians are gonna cite that Jackson was an agent of not historians, there's gonna be a bullshitter that says Stalin was the agent of Tulsi Gabbard.

And it's the same way they lied about Stalin.

I know these things empirically are lies.

I know how they lie about communists, because I am a communist.

My comrades are communists.

They lie about us.

Case closed, they use the same methodology against Stalin, Lenin, Mao, that I empirically know they are lying.

And therefore, I am fanatically devoted to communism with absolute.

Blind devotion, blind fanaticism, without even fucking thinking about it.

Because if I can confirm this shit empirically that these people are fucking liars and that's their methodologies to make shit up and lie, then I am a fan, I will die on Lenin's last will.

The last words of Lenin, I die on those words.

You understand?

The way Lenin was moving in his party, how much he was fighting against these scum.

How much only people like Stalin had Lenin's back, by the way, you know.

And we have to say this is Lenin's lineage, this is his dynasty that we're a part of.

We're a part of Lenin's revolutionary dynasty.

That's what this is.

We're part of the dynasty.

Of course we are.

We're part of the lineage.

Of course we are.

What the fuck else would we be?

You say you're the American Communist Party, correct, and America is worldwide.

People don't understand that.

Even my camera doesn't, 'cause it's getting out of fucking focus 'cause of this hat.

In any case

Wasabi debacle I'm the reserve

Yeah, bro.

Next time Bouncy Ben tries to jump you on some shit, you literally just gotta take out your phone and message Volk Vulture.

Put Volk Vulture on the line.

Bouncy Ben flees from Volk Vulture.

All these vermin flee from Volk Vulture.

Put Volk Vulture on the line always.

Because what he said is true.

That's what some people don't understand.

That what he said is true.

Put him on the line.

Ain't nobody will go toe-to-toe with Volk Vulture on some shit.

It's like, I watch the skies, Volk Vulture watch the neighborhood.

I don't like to deal with the text reply shit because I like to use my voice.

But Volk Vulture will stand and deliver when called upon to use text to destroy and obliterate the enemy.

You know what I mean?

So absolutely.

And and and you know, we even need

Project 20, I wish there was a way we could have Volk Vulture become an app.

He could upload his brain into an AI.

We could download the Volk Vulture app and an AI Volk Vulture.

We literally just carry it everywhere we go.

Anyone tries to bother us, we put it on and have Volk Vulture destroy every mog the fuck out of people in real life.

Yeah, Bouncy Ben, he could tell he was even bouncing in that clip, how nervous and bouncy he is.

He's got a problem with Stalin.

Every single pederast and scumbag and piece of shit.

Huge projection from Bouncy Ben.

Everyone who wants to slander Stalin.

Look into the character of who these people are who spread this bullshit, who say this bullshit about Stalin.

Look into their who they are.

What is their character?

What kind of people are these?

Are these moral people?

Are these good people?

Absolutely fucking not.

If you hate Stalin, you guys will not believe some of this shit I have in my.

If I told you guys how much I defend Stalin in my personal life, you wouldn't believe it.

You would not but I I don't even want to tell you 'cause I don't want you to emulate me and destroy your personal life.

Okay, I I deadass have had an experience where I was told, okay,

Okay, I've had girlfriends who told me, who didn't like Stalin for family reasons, and they told me, you have to choose, because this hurts my feelings that you glorify Stalin.

You have to choose.

Guess what I chose?

You have no fucking idea how serious this shit is for me.

Do you understand?

You have no fucking idea.

I don't want to encourage this autism for y'all, but I'm just trying to say: I defend Stalin on my life.

I don't give a fuck.

Nobody gets in the way.

I died.

He's like, this is the Shia lineage in me.

It's like the 12 Imams.

Nobody's infallible.

Everybody's human.

But this is truth.

This is somebody who was slandered, maligned, unjustly ridiculed by history.

What kind of bitch falls in line and says, yeah, Stalin was bad?

No, you defend like a lion.

You rise like a lion.

You say, they're all lying about Stalin.

I defend the truth.

The way I am one with Hussein is when I defend Stalin, when I defend Lenin, when I defend Mao.

Because that takes some fucking effort.

Because you go against the grain, all these fucking cattle-believing bullshit, and then the lion roars.

No.

We will not accept this ridicule, this slander against a hero.

See, the true heroism is scorned, it's forgotten about by history, it's they ridicule, they throw bullshit on the on his grave.

Why?

Because I'll tell you why.

I'm gonna get in a whole lecture about the origins of the sea people and

The Aquatic Origins of Evil

If you think I'm fucking crazy, okay?

Wait till I'm done talking and then you can say something.

Chris, what's up?

I'll tell you the truth about this world.

There's two forces in this world, okay?

There are those who believe in a principle of resonance.

No, I don't know who is good and I don't know who is bad, but I know.

I know one thing alignment.

With Cosmos.

is good.

Cosmos is good.

The resonance we have with heaven is aligned and corresponds to the good.

Do you know what that fucking means?

That means when you look in the water and you don't know what the fuck is in there, you trust what's in that water, what comes out of it.

That's why the first followers of Jesus Christ, what was their symbol?

The fish

That's cosmic resonance, that's cosmos, that's going through the cosmos, which you don't know.

You don't know what's at the other side, you don't know what's at the other end.

Of this process by which you are tested, by which everyone is tested.

You don't know what's at the end of it.

There's no immediate proof or certainty you can have in the good.

There's a curtain between you and the truth.

And when you choose to believe that behind that curtain is something good.

These evil satanic people will come to you and say you're a sucker because they're wicked and they're evil in their hearts.

And you know what these people believe?

They believe the universe is evil.

They believe it is impossible that we have people like Stalin, people like Lenin, people like Mao, people like Che Guevara.

They have to tarnish their character, they have to throw blight and they have to blacken their name.

Because what they truly want us to believe.

Is that there is no good in the world.

That these people had to have been rotten and corrupt and evil somehow, right?

That everything in the world is totally depraved.

And the only thing you can trust is this miserable

Angst within yourself

That's it.

They want us to belie they want us to be cynical, they want us to say, No, Stalin was this evil, horrible person.

Because they are frightened.

by the fact, the simple fact, and it's not complicated, the good can simultaneously be good and mighty and powerful and in this reality,

Some say in this world.

I say in this reality.

Reality can be both powerful, mighty and good.

It is possible for that to be real.

Just like in Star Wars,

When

The old guy told Anakin, he said, You can use the force

To be both powerful and good.

And then the pedophile Obi-Wan and the pedophile green Yoda.

And Diddy Windu

All were trying to tell him, No, you just have to sit and I don't know cross your legs and do nothing.

But when you have the red saber, you can actually have both power and righteousness combined.

And that is the Persian way, not the Gay Rik pederast way.

Although I will defend the Greeks a little bit in my lecture today.

I'm just trying to give you a little bit of an introduction.

It's like Obi-Wan

The green one, Yoda.

Diddy Windu.

and every other Jedi was a pederast.

I've told this story many times.

They were all pederasts and their Epstein Island was the Child Jedi Temple.

And that was a pederastic modelled off of ancient Gay Reese with their democratic republics and gay Reese.

That was their rape, child rape, dungeon.

And the Persianate hero, he's like Mithros, he's like a Persianate hero, you know, Anakin or Darth Vader.

He goes into this temple and he takes his sword in front of all the children and then the scene cuts.

So they want us to believe he killed those children, right?

But little do you know if you use AI to actually see what happens after the scene cuts, he opens his sword and he cuts the chains because they were in chains, those children.

He cuts the chains.

He says, you are free now.

Leave this place and be free and be safe from the pederast Yoda and Diddy Windu.

And they were all celebrating, and it was the most heroic thing in the world.

But the Zionist media.

Like Simon, Seabag, Montev they all you see how they cut the whole movie to make it seem like it didn't happen.

And they don't tell you this, but this is the truth.

He was freeing them.

Anakin was himself a victim.

He empowered himself to free himself.

And he brought, he created the Persian Empire in the galaxy and the universe.

And then Luke was a victim of Obi-Wan, a serial pedophile.

He wouldn't stop.

First he Anakin and then it's actually a tr horrific tragedy when you think about it.

And this is the truth.

I h d I I ridicule and despise those who say, No, we just have to think about a fairy tale tale realm.

And we have to ignore reality.

Some people say this world and they mean the dunya, right?

They say you should think about heaven, not just the dunya.

Okay, but they're misusing the language when they apply it in the modern context, because it's the real al-Haqq that is the Absolute, the real.

The dunya is not the real, okay?

This world is not the real.

This world, when they say this world, they are talking about a specific order.

They're talking about a specific established way of things.

Okay?

They're not talking about reality and that we should be we should take refuge in a in a in a I don't know uh unreal realm.

This complete fucking nonsense.

But this is this is why they attack Stalin, because Stalin apparently is evil, because whoever believes the good can be real, that's not possible.

The good has to be evil and bad.

Well, you know who believes sorry, the real has to be evil and bad.

You know who believes this is evil people.

Evil people believe this.

You know, when they say, I'll give you the perfect example.

Let's say, and this is, you know, this is 99% of the time.

I'm going to tell you something about human psychology.

Make perfect sense.

Let's say there's.

Let's say a man and a woman are together.

Uh completely in private.

And there's just a curtain between them and everyone else.

99% of people will assume something is going down.

But the truth is

A lot of the time, nothing is happening.

But people assume because they themselves are perverts.

You see?

So, there's a curtain between us and Stalin's motivations.

And everyone assumes, no, Stalin is motivated by some corruption and he's evil, he wants to bully.

There's a curtain, the iron curtain, around the whole communist world.

And the sick, perverted, pornographic West assumed, just like how they make shit up about North Korea, they assume that behind the curtain, all sorts of wicked, evil, depraved things are going on.

And it's just a projection of what they think the real is.

It's a projection of how they see reality.

It's a projection of their own ugly, infidel, faithless understanding of the real.

Because when you have faith in the cosmos, you don't ultimately believe reality is depraved.

Yes, depravity can exist within our reality, but ultimately speaking, reality is not depraved.

That's why when I go to China or Russia, and when I will go to the DPRK if it's legal.

No one has to convince me of any I know how things are, I'm I'm human.

All the time when I go to Russia, when I'm in Moscow, I laugh at the things people say about Russia.

I go to Russia, I don't even think about these stupid things in the West people have in their head about how things are in Russia.

Because I know reality is not depraved.

You see, they think that because

Something is powerful or it's closed or it's inaccessible to our immediate consumption.

They think that must mean there's something bad.

Because if if there's a veil, then behind the veil has to be something bad and filthy and awful.

It's a Rorschach test.

Okay.

It's like: imagine I give you a box and I say, What is in this box?

Okay.

Now, think about how much of a Rorschach test this is.

Everyone fucking listen to me right now.

Think about how much this is a Rorschach test.

If I have a box, nobody knows what's inside of it, and I come to you and say, hey, well, what's in this box?

Okay, the guy who goes, I think that there is a severed penis and ball sac.

In that box.

Uh

It um turned into a sculpture of Mickey Mouse.

You know, that's oddly specific.

Okay, so whoever assumes that's what's in the box, that's just a projection of some.

very depraved thing they have in their own head.

But then if you say, you know, maybe in the box there's chocolate or something or there's maybe uh, I don't know, a tennis shoes or something, then that's how a normal person would respond.

Okay, I mean, who knows, right?

So when they make things up about communism, they hold communist society, it's like a box, and everything that they say happens inside of it is just a projection of their own hideous evil within.

Same thing for any communist movement or party or anything.

It's the same thing.

It's a projection of how hideously evil your understanding of reality is.

Are you trying to allude to z See, sometimes people say things in my chat.

And I have to think to myself

When every schizophrenic in the world thinks I'm talking to them about whatever's in their mind.

I want to be.

I don't know who Xeno Xeno Xeno Zoo Paracios.

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Whatever that shit is, is in your head.

Everyone, I need to be fucking clear about something.

Your head is your head.

My head is my head.

The shit that I communicate and I broadcast and I tell you, I'm not giving you something coded.

I have my own head.

You have your own fucking head.

I don't read your mind telepathically.

I don't have no fucking idea what's going on in your head.

Okay?

I don't know who Zooko Zeno Zabadu is.

I don't know what the fuck that is.

Right?

You got your own head, I got my own.

I'm in here, you're in whatever the fuck you're in.

All right, what I say.

I don't s I didn't just volunteer for crazy people to read into everything I fucking say.

Okay?

What I'm trying to say is, the thing people cannot accept is that the ratio of good and evil is the same everywhere, on every level, on every dimension.

And the triumph of good when good prevails, when good prevails, that does not mean the ratio changes.

It means that evil.

Is no longer

given the power to define.

That duality.

Darkness is no longer evil, it's just darkness.

Life is about there's a door and behind the door someone's taking a shit.

And you and you know what evil is?

Evil is when you say behind that door.

He's beheading someone and eating them alive.

In reality, he's just taking a shit.

And then he said, Well, why is there darkness in the first place?

Because that is the cosmos, light and dark.

Evil is when you read into the dark as evil.

When dark is just part of what we are, we all are dark.

Yes, yes, I'm going to close the door when I take a shit.

That doesn't mean I have something to hide.

It means that's where my dignity begins.

Because I have to reckon with my place in this world on my own terms.

You have no right to partake in that with me because you literally cannot, and it is impossible.

You understand what that fucking means?

Evil!

Evil lies in interpreting the dark as evil when it's not.

Black and white, dark and light.

The good prevails when they are in harmony.

When you can understand that that's just what life is.

It's complex.

North Korea is not a p it's not a utopian paradise, but it's not this depraved, fucking evil place that, um.

You know, these sicko Western people say it is.

In reality, North Korea is a complicated society full of human beings who are absolutely human, who are absolutely full of contradictions, and are doing their best to build their own way and build their own life with all the contradictions that entails, all the struggles that entails.

Nobody said it's when people, you know, that's the sickest thing they've done to the whole name of communism.

They say the communists promised utopia, and then at the slightest bit of struggle, they say, see, it's a dystopia.

No, it's neither utopia, it's neither dystopia.

No one promised, no one promised the elimination of struggle.

What was promised is that struggle would for the first time correspond and be governed by a righteous path, struggle under the righteous path, struggle under and governed by righteous principles, righteous goals.

Yes, it's a struggle.

Nobody denied that it's struggle.

Nobody denied there's black and there's white, there's light and there's dark.

What is the struggle for?

That's what's decisive.

How the struggle is defined, what it is for, that is what is decisive in whether good or evil prevails.

Because the same ratio out of which good and evil emerges is the same everywhere.

So they say if it's not an absolute utopia, it has to be an absolute dystopia.

No, nobody promised utopia, it's not a dystopia either.

It's it's struggle under a different principle.

Simple as that.

And sometimes principles are strong enough and righteous and noble enough that even more struggle is justified in the pursuit of fulfilling them and being governed by them.

And I insist upon that.

Absolutely, it's true.

We have this distinction with Hobbes and is human nature good or is human nature bad?

This is an attempt to escape the struggle of what it means to be human.

Human nature

Is confusion.

And when you are guided by alignment with the cosmos, that is how you discover the good.

That's the way that they would talk about the Tao, that's what it is.

Human nature

Is alignment with the cosmos, but it is not a, it's a struggle to achieve that alignment.

And the struggle justifies the struggle.

That alignment justifies the struggle, absolutely.

People fail to understand this and they fail to comprehend this.

They have this idea somehow.

In their stupid little head.

That if it's not one thing it has to be the exact opposite thing.

And they say what's the point of communism if I don't immediately get a Nintendo Wii?

You get purpose.

What the fuck else can you ask for?

In this life except purpose.

And sometimes when I hear these people talk about what guides them and what their purpose in life is, I just laugh at them.

My purpose is to pursue happiness.

Gay?

In a non-homophobic sense, it's like what am I hearing?

Like, I just think of some guy on a bicycle wearing the bike outfit with a helmet.

My purpose is to achieve happiness in a

I don't know, in a non-homophobic sense.

Purpose is about struggle.

Purpose is about something bigger than yourself.

Purpose is about being part of something.

I don't know.

What can I say?

I respect people.

You know, the non-I respect non-communists, absolutely.

But the ones that are part of a ghetto gospel, an odyssey, a story that matters, a tragedy, something, something tragic, something beautiful.

Something you can make a story out of that generations will know after you die that teaches them some wisdom about this universe we live in.

But then I see a Redditor go, I just wanna looks max and happiness max and bicycle max.

I wanna run you over with my car, get the fuck out of the fucking uh the bicycle lane, get the fuck out of here, man.

Just just pass me, just pass me.

I can't do that, motherfucker, I don't fucking see shit.

Holding up everybody.

Just pass me.

Just pass.

I don't know what the hell's going on.

I just run you over or some shit.

You see

Some people say okay.

See, people lack purpose in life, it's so sad.

And then you know the worst thing is a narcissist.

The worst thing is a narcissist.

The narcissist who says, I'm the main character, this is about me.

I'm the main character.

You are not the fucking main character.

Even Haas is not the main character.

You know, so so many people, they think that their life is the wolf of Wall Street and they're just about to make some Bitcoin.

Everyone's story: My life is: I started out from nothing, and I'm gonna make so much on Bitcoin and be the wolf of Wall Street.

And that's my ghetto gospel.

And these people are never going anywhere in their fucking life.

Oh, yeah, well, I'm a dreamer.

Who the fuck told you that?

Mickey Mouse to follow your dream?

Shut the fuck up.

You're not even following your dreams.

You don't even have a dream.

You're just a fucking NPC who lacks direction.

You just chose whatever shit came out of your ass and you started worshiping it as if it fucking matters.

I'm some real shit.

I'm just telling the fucking truth about how it actually is.

That's it.

Don't shoot the messenger.

Everybody's got a dream, but none of these dreams.

Have we considered if these dreams are actually beautiful or not?

Because they're not.

My Reesus, what's up?

Somebody's like, I want to be a rapper.

I want to be a SoundCloud rapper.

The only rapper that I know who's good that came from nothing is Treezy.

That's it.

Everybody else needs to stop.

Okay.

Treezy, he's got it going.

All right.

Everybody else except Trezy needs to stop.

The Trezy, and then there's another guy who's on TikTok who spent se uh seven years in prison.

He's 48 years old, and he's got a song that's like, It's automatic, it's automatic.

What does he say?

It's automatic, money has it.

Put it in the wood grind put it in the wood grind.

Put it in the wood grind, put it in the wood grind.

Rumor has it.

Rumor has it.

It's automatic.

Rumor.

That guy's going places for sure.

The rumor has a guy going places.

All right.

I don't know how the fuck somebody in my chat found out who that is.

Somebody in the chat literally identified the rapper.

That's fucking crazy.

GT Billionaire.

GT Billionaire is going places, or I'll tell you he's going places.

All right.

I'll tell you, GT billionaire going place.

What about Tupac?

Bro, listen.

All right, listen.

Tupac

Died 50 years ago.

All right.

Why is it that every time someone has to name a single black man, they just think it's like, I understand if you live in Macedonia and you're forced to name the only black guy you can ever think of, and you name Tupac or Biggie Smalls or Snoop Dogg or something, I'll forgive you.

But if we're Americans, can you at least name another black guy except Tupac?

I understand if you're living in Macedonia or something.

And you're in some village somewhere, you've never seen a black person in your life, but you still think it's about Tupac and Biggie.

You know what I mean?

It's like you gotta actually be a little more cultured if you're in America.

All right.

Like, I'm telling you, like, we're talking about some serious music.

Like, rumor has it, automatic.

I'm Argentine.

Well that explains it.

There's not a single black person in all of Argentina.

Argentina does not have one black person.

There's not even one.

The only black person to come out of Argentina was Che Guevara, that's the only one.

There's never been a black person from Argentina except Jay Guevara.

He is forty six years old, he did seven years in prison, his rapping is slow and more hip hop than trap, absolutely.

Got a man of culture in the building.

I understand.

We got somebody who knows what's going on in the the rap game, how it's changing.

Rumor has it.

Rumor has it.

It's automatic.

Rumor has it.

We know what's going on.

See, those of us who are insiders,

Not like the needle drop, Anthony Fantano, and G DJ fat ass academics.

Those of us who truly know what's going on in the hip-hop scene, who truly understand the dynamics and how the game is changing.

We know about GT Billionaire, okay?

We know about Automatic and rumor has it and shit.

Those of these people who don't know the fuck what's going on, they're talking about some nonsense.

They're talking about Kendrick Lamar or some shit.

I hate you, Drake.

I hate you, Drake, so much.

You and I might put my funny voice on.

I hate you so much.

And these people think that's good music, right?

Certified pedophile, certified pizza shit, fuck you, Drake!

Certified man, certified pedophile, certified bitch, certified motherfucker.

Hate you, Drake, so much.

Great lyrics, lyrical genius, straight up.

Just straight up, just directly telling people you don't like them and you calling them names.

Great, great, great lyrics.

It's 'cause Drake gave me money one time.

I don't I don't I don't even I don't listen to Drake.

I don't listen to anything.

I listened to the real shit that's on the come up, like GT Billionaire.

Y'all don't know about that though.

He did seven years in prison.

He's 46 years old, more hip-hop than trap, and he raps low.

You guys don't know about that shit, though, because you're caught up in some bullshit.

All right.

I know about GT Money.

I know about some real music.

All right.

You know about some bullshit.

Billionaire CT, all right?

I know about some real shit.

Y'all are caught up in this bullshit nonsense, all right.

I don't give a fuck about it.

All right.

I will say Akon has always been goaded.

And a lot of people, it takes a lot for people to admit that Akon has always been goaded.

Akon has never been in some drama.

He's always been chill.

He's always been about some shit.

He's just been singing the whole time.

Comic music.

He doesn't give a fuck about none of this.

You think Akon would never be caught dead in something like the Drake Kendrick beef?

That's why Akon's the GOAT.

And he was about to make Akon City in Senegal before Nanyahu stopped it.

So anyway

He did get caught up in Ah, what?

Acon Acon 2.

Something happened to him.

He got an allegation.

Shit, man.

Fuck everybody then.

And fuck everybody, man.

I don't I don't vouch for nothing, right?

Really?

It's automatic.

Rumor has it.

It was bullshit.

Alright.

I don't even know what this whole thing about when people defend whether a celebrity is good or not.

Okay, if it's Stalin, I understand.

But if it's some guy who's been making music and singing, well, why are we so morally invested in their reputation?

We know them because they made good music, so who fucking cares?

What does that actually say about how morally aligned you are?

I mean, I understand to an extent.

Yeah, I get it.

Art is moral.

I understand that.

But you want to know why.

I wanna know why people are morally aligned with the reputation of artists and whether they're good people or not.

See, like, let me tell you: who made Superman?

Let's say the guy who made Superman, the latest disgusting one.

Let's say it was discovered he was a pedophile.

All the millennial fans of that disgusting movie would realize that they have a pedophile taste and they would rush to defend him from the because it's your taste is shit and it corresponds to immorality and disalignment with the cosmos and its filth.

That's why.

I didn't think it was that bad.

I mean it's

I can't I can't deal with it.

You didn't think the latest Superman I didn't even watch that shit, I'll never watch it.

There's a movie I'm going to talk about for tonight's lecture that I didn't even watch, The Odyssey.

I didn't even watch it, but I'm going to cite it.

It's going to be the main frame of the lecture.

My face is misaligned with the camera because I got this hat on, all right.

Only thing I can do is if I'm like this

Can can't you know, AI and technology has gotten so prof you know what?

Listen.

I'm not bullshitting right, I don't wanna fucking bullshit her.

I need one person to tell me I have a Sony A7 III.

Show me what camera I can buy right now that will never do this and link it in the show request.

I don't give a fuck if it's $2,000.

I need a camera that will not do this.

Okay.

I have a Sony 7 with three A7 III.

Tell me what I need to buy so this never happens again.

Because this has been happening for three years and I have no fucking way to fix it.

Why are you focusing on William G.

Foster?

Every time, stop it.

It's so

What did I do to deserve this shit, man?

It's a skill issue.

I don't know, man.

I'm always getting out of focus with this shit.

From AI, use.

I need a camera expert.

With all due respect, I need a camera expert.

All right.

I don't wanna hear what AI is hallucinating, 'cause it's even Astro retarded a lot of the time.

All right.

Switch it to manual focus.

Why are you guys pretending like I know what the fuck that means?

Why are you guys acting like I know what the fuck that means?

All right.

I want to deliver a lecture right now.

But I'm being distracted by this mess.

Maybe I gotta change my hat.

But do I have my hat?

Alright y'all.

Bro, stop spamming me about three hundred Zack Snyder's film where he's got a bunch of sweaty men in underwear running around and shit.

Like, well, I'm gonna talk about that retarded ass.

Zesty ass films Zack Snyder made, I've I have nothing to do with that, all right?

He's got Xerxes for some fucking reason.

You know how confused Persians were when they saw that shit?

Like Xerxes, some bald, naked guy who's giant, bald, naked guy for no reason.

Like, what does this have to do with Persia?

Name me a single thing in the history of Persia that's got anything to do with this freaky, ditty ass shit Zack Snyder came up with while he was hallucinating on marijuana.

What the fuck was that shit, man?

Like Zack Snyder was literally I don't know, he thought of that in his head.

And nobody understands why.

Imagine they make a movie about Hazal Deen and I'm the villain, right?

Imagine, let's say they're gonna make a movie about Hazal Deen, all right?

Like, uh two thousand years from now they're gonna make a movie about Hazaldine, right?

And they're going to depict me as an eight-foot bald black man who's naked, who's got piercings everywhere, who's not wearing any clothes.

And they're going to say that was Haas.

That's the same shit they did to Xerxes in 300.

Like the real Xerxes in history deadass I'm not even kidding the real Xerxes in history deadass probably looked like me.

Like he probably had my same stature, my proportions, he probably had a beard like me, he probably looked the same way I did.

And look at the contrast between reality and whatever the fuck came out of Zack Snyder's head.

Yeah, imagine they they make a movie about Stalin.

And they for the actor for Stalin they put the the the engineer from Prometheus the the the white alien engineer from Prometheus yeah that's Stalin huh

What about the immortals?

Is that real?

We got retards in the chat.

No fucking way.

We got some actual retards in the chat.

No, bro, don't troll me.

He's got to be trolling.

Bro, asked me if the immortals from 300 were real.

The supernatural people that could like take 10,000 arrows and had those masks and bro, chill, all right?

Don't be rage baiting me.

Go ahead.

Let's be realistic here, alright?

That's that's the most Netanyahu rendition of history was 300 or some stupid ass movie.

This is Spotter!

And then he kicks that guy.

That whole movie was just about

That movie was just about like uh

This is madness.

You want to know what I'm going to tell you what 300 was actually about.

300 was about the fantasy of a drunkard who can get revenge against like Taco Bell employees or some shit.

Like brown or black immigrants that come and they're like, they're the customer service you have to deal with.

When you go to Walmart, you're like, let me speak with the manager.

And there's like some Indian guy or there's a black guy maybe or something.

And like you have to actually deal with the bureaucracy and the institution.

Like whether it's a bank teller or something.

And like there's some drunkard just being like, No, madness.

They're like, Sir, this is a Chase Bank.

What are you doing?

Madness, this is Sparta And then he just kicks the guy into a pit, the the dumb idiot.

Customer service guy, the dumb employee who got in your way, who wouldn't g give you exactly what you wanted, the drunk guy, like that was the fantasy of three hundred.

I'm not even kidding.

The whole fantasy of three hundred is like just like completely destroying.

Uh, you know, the the managerial bureaucracy of everyday life, which sometimes is actually dead ass necessary, you know.

Yeah, it's the 300 Karens versus like movie theater employees or some shit.

Like, that's straight up what it is.

Subway employees or some shit.

Hehehehe

So three hundred is dead ass or retarded ass movie, all right.

I don't see any redeeming qualities.

Well, the martial arts are qu man.

Put some fucking clothes on.

Alright, anyway y'all, let's get into the lecture.

So I've been thinking a lot about the relationship.

Ah, this can be some big brain ass shit.

If you tap out and tune out now, you are officially mentally deficient, mentally retarded.

And you need to admit yourself into a mentally disabled institution for retards.

'Cause now the jokes are gonna end in all this kinda shit and you're gonna oh, I don't know the attention span.

You this is why people need to be beaten into education straight up with b uh bamboo sticks and baseball bats and shit.

By force.

Just like the what do they call it?

Behavioural

Havlovian feedback.

That's the only way to educate people.

Okay.

So something I've been thinking about a lot recently.

Is um

We have the urban sedentary, sedentary nomadic dialectic, right?

So you have settled institutions, you have settled civilization centered around a temple complex.

Michael Hudson talks about it in Temples of Enterprise, right?

So you've got a temple complex, a palace, palatial type of economy.

It's all the same thing, an imperial center, a capital.

Usually it's walled or it's enclosed.

It's a store of accumulated knowledge and wisdom.

That's ultimately what it is.

So, I'm going to give you the Epic of Gilgamesh in a very condensed version, although this isn't really the content of the Epic of Gilgamesh.

This is the mythological origin of kingship and governance and everything, right?

So, I will explain to you the story of human beings.

So, for hundreds of thousands of years, human beings were running around jungles and forests naked, spazzing out and just like doing random retarded shit.

All right, that's the story.

I'm being like hyperbolic, or whatever.

They were basically just monkeys running around and shit, right?

All right.

Well, enter recorded.

Archaeolog archaeological archaeologically verifiable history.

Now, I want to preface something with a warning.

It's actually very terrifying.

For everything civilization has built right now to disappear from the archaeological record wouldn't take that long.

So, we actually don't know how long the human story is or what the fuck happened.

You know, before 10,000 years ago, we say 10,000 years ago, that's when the last ice age ended.

Um and that's when human history begins.

But the truth is, that's human history as we know it.

What whatever the fuck was going on before then, we don't have a lot.

We have some, not a lot.

And how much of what would have been before could have even survived in the archaeological record, we don't exactly have very little, okay?

Anyway.

We believe

That most human beings were in bands of tribes.

Uh they're not called tribes, they're called uh

There's the factory, there's the tribe, is the bigger one, then it divides into the factory.

I believe it's the gens.

You have the gens, and then from the gens, you have the kind of households, right.

So most human beings were divided in this kind of you have your immediate household, which is part of the gens, it's either patrilineal or matrilineal.

Usually it was matrilineal actually.

A few gens together made up a factory.

And then a collection of factories would would be what we would call a tribe, okay?

So beyond the tribe, I'm not going to get into it, but that's basically the kind of sociological distinction that that's relevant.

In any case, um that's how Frederick Engels describes it in The Origin of the Family, by the way.

And somewhere along the line there was a division in terms of um

How people created the means of their subsistence, right?

So there has always been two main elements defining the primitive communist mode of production in history, right?

You have one that is primarily rooted in foraging, so going to trees and getting berries and nuts and stupid things like that.

And then hunting, you know, hunting game, big game, animals.

Okay.

Well, the cultivation of

Means of production and knowledge and so on also split and bifurcated along these two lines, somewhere along the line, right?

So you have two things, right?

Horticulture and early forms of proto-agriculture, where you start to actually plant things and intentionally cultivate plants in ways that maximize the production of foodstuffs.

And sedentary forms of organization are created around that.

And then on the opposite end, you have pastoralism, right?

So which means people are getting they're not just hunting animals anymore, they're actually capturing animals and they're engaging in animal husbandry.

They're raising the animals, they're taking care of them, they're getting secondary food products off of them.

Like sheeps and goats and whatever the fuck, right?

And these people became nomadic in large part because the animals are constantly on the move.

Because they need pasture.

You know, they need to fucking eat grass.

So how do you feed those animals?

Well, they just eat the shit on the ground.

So you just gotta keep moving to feed the livestock that you have.

And you live off the livestock, and this is basically the nomadic form of organization, right?

So, I'm giving you a very brief rundown.

So, this, but even the nomads were transhuman most of the time, meaning they moved in cycles that corresponded to the regrowing of grass and pasture, right?

So, seasonally, they would all meet in sacred meeting grounds.

Temples.

And this was tied to the movement of the stars.

It was very astrological.

And this is where, you know, different groups would meet together and probably trade and negotiate laws and exchange stories and all that kind of stuff, right?

Okay, so

Fast forward a lot.

Sedentarization eventually took the form

Of temples around which human beings congregated, being the receptacle and store of knowledge.

Because let me tell you what was going on before that.

Horticultural and pastor uh sorry, agricultural, proto-agricultural people.

Were you know, I don't know, they were doing some stuff with plants, and then like some big fire or flood came and killed everyone, and then everyone had to start from scratch, like over and over again.

The cycle would just repeat, right?

Eventually.

People

Started to gain something called knowledge.

And they would store the knowledge in a centralized location, and this knowledge would survive, otherwise, civilization or society-ending catastrophes.

So, if you know the Bible, you know there's a story called Noah's Ark.

Okay Noah's Ark is that there's a big flood coming.

And Noah needs to put all the animals on the boat.

And all the knowledge and all the things on this ark that will survive the flood.

Okay.

Well, that's what the first temples of Enterprise, according to Michael Hudson, were.

Okay, so the knowledge and the techniques.

And the skills

And the

Fucking camera.

I'm I'm about to crash the fuck out

All the things people base

Yeah, I just have to stare at it and I'll be good.

I look Jewish as fuck.

Sides are growing like this shit.

You know what I mean?

Anyway.

All the things people needed to survive, basically.

We're good.

across these uh unavoidable natural events that were outside of anyone's control.

Okay, so this was a store of knowledge, it was a store of the accumulated knowledge, the ability, the techniques, ultimately what?

Wisdom.

Okay, wisdom.

So

The most successful, you know, this is we're talking about the Neolithic revolution, societies.

They became time travelers.

They built these temples as a form of time travel.

Cycles of nature that would otherwise wipe out human communities became things that could be withstood thanks to the fact that knowledge and wisdom was being stored in a central location.

And these things could survive disasters.

So the temples became the center of complexes, sedentary complexes, societal complexes.

And most of these

Relationships were governed still by household relations, you know, gentile relations, tribal relations.

And the the temple was mainly a neutral place that people would send their orphans to, their disabled.

And they would pay tribute to, like, out of worship for their gods or something, or their deities.

And it was just kind of considered like the Red Cross or something, right?

It was outside of the immediacy of relations.

But it wasn't this domineering state that governed people per se.

It was a neutral zone, okay, between different chiefdoms and Gentile tribal formations, whatever.

Whether they're matriarchal or otherwise, it doesn't matter.

So

Okay, so eventually

You have

Uh zones of territory that are

defined.

So each temple complex eventually got so sophisticated and so used to governing disputes and conflicts between people

That the complex around the temple would become a territory.

And the territory would be the place that the law or the norms, the conventions, rule.

Because people got used to living side by side for so long.

And they've gotten used to conflict, the cycle of conflict and dispute, and there's a means for it to be mediated.

And there's a means for them to be recognized even outside of the immediacy of their tribal relationships, which was the temple.

Okay?

So that became a territory.

Territory identifies people, it incorporates people, it can code people, and it makes people part of a system of knowledge and wisdom.

Now, that was why sedentary societies were less violent, and that's why they were typically considered more civilized, just because of that.

Now, nomads did have transgenerational oral traditions of knowledge and techniques and stuff they would pass down.

But what they did not have was a fixed territory, obviously.

Even if they were transhuman.

And that would oftentimes put them into contact with other kinds of nomads and other kinds of people.

There was no neutral pact governing their relationships.

And even the pacts that did govern their relationships were extremely volatile, and I'll tell you why.

In temple societies, there was always the temple as this neutral institution that was centralized, it was locked in one place, and most people were not mobile, they were sedentary.

So when there was generational disputes about the transmission of wealth and inheritance and all these kinds of different conflicts that inevitably arise in the interactions between human beings,

Temple was always a go-to place for mediation.

Well, you when you're in the middle of nowhere, like the nomads often were, inheritance disputes, there was no neutral mechanism to to sort those out and settle them.

You could go to a neutral meeting ground, and oftentimes that is what happened.

But these neutral meeting grounds were not full of wealth and they weren't as stable as the temples were in agricultural Neolithic societies, right?

So there's more violence going on between nomadic pastoralists, conflict, fighting, raiding, killing.

I mean, when you don't have a precedent that governs your relationships, and you're in a zone that is not defined yet as a territory, so you're beyond territory.

Uh it's oftentimes a free-for-all.

And

In the nomadic sedentary dialectic, there is a common story of what happens, and there's movies probably that are based off of this story, right?

And you'll see the themes yourself when you watch them, right?

So

Oftentimes what ends up happening.

Is

Nomads that are used that have accumulated a history of raiding other people that they don't know, who have they have no connections to, maybe they don't even speak the same language, they just go and plunder them and steal their shit and raid them, right?

It's like land piracy.

Well, when they would find out about these rich temple complexes that stored so much grain and so much wealth and whatever, oftentimes they would be fair game as well.

They would go and target them.

So the temples very quickly realized.

that they needed protection of some kind, right?

And they would seek out other tribal nomads to kind of be do this as mercenaries or something else.

Now the Bible talks about the whore of Babylon.

Well, most of these temple complexes had fertility goddesses and the goddesses were very wealthy and they you know, they were they were hiring people as mercenaries in all likelihood.

So, you know, this embroils them and the m this makes the temples privy to and part of the various disputes going on between tribal nomads.

No, I'm not talking about fucking Vikings.

I want everyone to take your imagination and shut it off.

Just be in a cult, okay?

If I'm not explicitly mentioning some shit, do not fucking have your head go there because you're just fucking yourself in the head, big time, when you're talking about fucking Vikings.

Big fucking difference between Vikings and nomadic pastoralists, okay?

I'll get there.

Let me get there.

But do not think of some gay ass Vikings.

Brumhilda's got the fire, I've got the storm.

Viking hip hop, queens and kings, we're in the form.

Get that Gen X shit the fuck out of here.

I'm not fucking talking about some fruity ass Vikings, alright?

I'm talking about some like actual just think of the Mediterranean world or think of the you know Iraq or Mesopotamia or some shit, Sumer, okay?

Don't be going to that fruity ass Viking shit just yet, right?

Anyway.

Um as I was saying.

So eventually the temples would be embroiled in these conflicts as well, right?

But something would happen along the line, and it's a love story.

That's really what it's about.

It's a love story, okay?

Nomadic peoples would realize that the temples have something that they don't have: wisdom.

Wisdom incarnate, okay?

Sophia, the temple is literally wisdom.

Okay, it's that's what wisdom is: wisdom across generations that's accumulated in an incarnated form.

Like it's actually there, that's wisdom.

We know how to do shit, we know how to grow things, we know how to remember things, we have historical memory, we have wisdom, okay.

Remember the meaning of wisdom in Islam, the ayats, the signs, hikmah means wisdom, and the notion of Sophia in the Greco-Roman tradition.

So some nomads eventually fall in love with wisdom.

They fall in love with Sophia, okay?

And they combine the kind of nomadic Jupiterian principle.

Of kingship and authority and honor and codes of honor with wisdom.

Okay, wisdom is a more Saturnian principle, I guess.

And this oftentimes is what happens.

Okay, Timerlang was a Turkic barbarian nomad, but he fell in love with Persian Persianate culture because that's Sophia.

It's wisdom.

You discover there's wisdom here.

Yes, you can beat people into submission.

You can kill people.

You can be as ruthless and murderous as you want.

When you discover there's wisdom here, there's something sublime and beautiful about that.

It's like, well, this is wisdom actually.

This just transcends me.

This transcends the immediacy of whatever fight and whatever conflict that I'm in.

So eventually, temples acquired rulers/slash protectors.

And these would be the shepherds guiding the sheep, you know, chosen among the best of the shepherds to guide the flock.

And they were coming from nomadic pastoral tribes and lineages.

And these would be the protectors of the temple complexes.

They would literally protect the temple.

I mean, that was their official role.

You know, if you look at the Bronze Age, their official role is the protectors of the temple.

Okay.

And they would fend off all the other land bandits, and eventually, what they would do is they would expand the territory of the temple into the other the no man's land where pastoral nomads previously were, and suddenly no man's land that was lawless, a lawless frontier, became governed by rules and laws and conventions and norms.

And that's how empires the first empires emerge, right?

The first forms of political authority emerge, right?

So there's I'm trying to say that in this nomadic sedentary dialectic, the fate of that is the domestication of the nomads under the sway of Inanna or Ishtar or some other kind of Sophianic

uh, you know, symbol of wisdom of the temple, right?

They become under the sway of something civilized and lawful and predictable

And which stores trans-historical wisdom across generations that outlives people and outlives tribes and all that kind of stuff.

Master, what's up?

So the first true philosophers really were warlords who became patrons of the temples.

Because philosophy means the love of Sophia.

Love of Sophia, okay?

Well, the first people who loved Sophia, truly, were these nomadic warlords.

They fell in love with Sophia.

They fell in love with the temple goddess or something, right?

And they decided they would, you know, protect them.

It's like, and the movie trope is so common.

You have a, you know, an anti-hero who's, it's like fucking Mad Max or some shit.

Like an anti-hero who spends their whole life fighting in the desert or something or somewhere in some like wilderness.

A cowboy even.

Okay, take the American trope.

This is probably the best one.

The best one is the cowboy Wild West trope.

Okay.

So you've got a cowboy who runs around, I don't know, the Wild West, and he just robbing banks, but he's killing people.

They're killing him.

He's fighting them or they're fighting him.

And, you know, they are.

This is just like a rough type of person who is very ruthless and whatever.

But then he visits a small little town out in the middle of nowhere, simple town, a humble town, and he falls in love with it.

And he's like, okay, look, these are simple people.

They're small people.

They're not very powerful and strong, but they genuinely have something going here.

They've got some wisdom here.

And then he decides that he's going to turn good and he's going to defend the small town from, I don't know, the powder gang.

I don't fucking know.

Some bad guys, some bad bandits.

It's a very common movie trope.

And sometimes the movie trope is even like an Outlander, and he visits a charming small town, and he's like, you know what?

This place is worth defending.

I'm going to stay and defend it.

So just think of this trope we have so often in these stories.

It's even in the Disney movie Cars, you know, with Lightning the Queen when he visits that stupid little town.

So I don't know.

I mean, there's all sorts of different tropes and archetypes you get in movies.

And stories and narratives that we find very compelling, which have this same theme, right?

Well, that's actually kind of what happened in the nomadic sedentary dialectic.

You know, somewhere along the line, Gilgamesh and these pastoral nomads come to recognize the temple and actually understand its value and its importance and how it's more precious than something, you know, that immediately appears more strong and powerful because it's more violent, you know?

Yeah, or Rango or something, right?

So, so we're nomads just tribes waiting to be accepted?

No, okay?

They were people who did not know how to initially come into contact with sedentary temple people, and at first treated them the same way they would treat any other tribal outsiders who were not part of their pacts.

But then, somewhere along the line, they realized: no, there's more to these temples than just another tribe.

There's something more here.

There's a bigger principle here.

Okay?

Usually, when you're a pastoral nomad.

Outsiders are outsiders.

If you ain't with the squad, you free game.

As T Grizzly said, if you ain't with the squad, you free game.

I don't got time for these sweet things.

But what happens in history is they do actually succumb to the sweet things.

Okay?

And that's really what I'm trying to say.

Like,

Um, eventually they do.

They do get won over and they realize, look, this isn't just some outsider tribe on the steppe or in the desert or fighting.

These are people who, over generations, have actually accumulated some wisdom.

And this wisdom is precious.

It's very vulnerable, but it's precious.

It's precious.

Think of a fucking library.

Yeah, you can just fucking take a you can destroy a library, you can burn a library down, but there's there's knowledge there, it's precious, there's something here that's precious.

And they succumb to that and they are won over to it.

So this is how the nomadic sedentary dialectic eventually culminates in the you know uh dynastic, Bronze Age, palatial economies that Michael Hudson talks about, which periodically are wiping debt.

These are more or less socialistic type of societies like ancient Egypt was.

And it's a pro-human, you know, there's a human principle there.

People are recognized.

I mean, there's a lot of violence that leads up to that moment, but eventually things resolve themselves into.

Uh

Human

Humanely aligned imperial principles, which are not incompatible with people's dignity and their humanity, and they're not being treated as animals, they're being recognized in some way.

Yes, there's a bunch of wars and conflicts that are still happening, but the default principle is mainly mutual recognition.

So things are resolving themselves into the kind of Hegelian, Kojave, and mutual recognition.

And I'm not saying everyone sees each other as equal, but I'm saying like.

Eventually, you do get some kind of resolution of the conflict and you know, peace and order and law and the territorialization of the world.

Okay.

So this is.

How territory

Expands into no man's land and civilization grows and so on.

Now, the thing that for years was puzzling me, and this is the actual lecture now, by the way, that was the introduction, this is the actual lecture.

Uh why did

Why do the tribes of the Pacific Northwest

Along with the Vikings, the Greeks, and the Japanese, and the British, and the Dutch, the Anglo-Dutch.

Why is there this opposing tendency, which is

You know, usury.

Just dehumanizing people, making them talking tools, like Aristotle said, just completely depriving them of any recognition and m taking them as slaves.

And you know, uh these kind of common imperial principles breaking down into political fragmentation and eventually giving rise to the principle of private property, right?

Which did not exist in these Bronze Age societies as a principle, to be clear.

So how does private property come to be is the same question.

Okay?

Some guys have Romans prob probably Romans come

Centuries after the Greeks, so let's focus on the Greeks in the Greek Dark Ages, okay?

But why are these people

Like, why do they have to ruin it for everyone?

And that's the whole story of the West, and that's America today, which is well, okay, all these societies have one thing in common, okay?

They're maritime societies.

So, the big question is: what about being

Maritime

Disposes people to avoid the nomadic sedentary dialectic, and instead of things resolving themselves into more territorialization, you have stuff like Vikings who are running around like raping people forever and never stopping, and they're never getting domesticated and they're never being won over by kind of Sophianic principle, right?

So, why does that never happen for the Anglo-Dutch, the Greeks, the Vikings?

And I mean, eventually, I guess, long down the line, it kind of does.

But why, before that happens, do these become countervailing?

Principles of State

Uh, because we're in one of those right now, by the way, and you know, you could say, well, eventually everything resolves itself into the kind of land-based imperial principle, right?

Well,

History does show a bifurcation of land-based empires and this kind of maritime private property tendency.

Like whether we're looking at the Pacific Northwest in America or we're looking at, you know, the Europe or Japan, you know, for that matter.

Cosmic Marxist, I don't appreciate your attempt to, having thought about this for the first time ever, come up with a solution.

Whenever I confront you guys with a problem, I'm only doing it because I've been dealing with it for years or a long time, and it's not my first thought I'm sharing with you.

And no, it has nothing to do with surplus.

Okay, it's not true.

It's really not true.

So let me finish my thesis, and then you can decide if you accept it or reject it.

And this is something always in my lectures that happens.

Like every time I give a lecture, someone, when I say, why is this?

And then someone immediately has the solution.

Well, why didn't I think of that?

Now surpluses are characteristic of

The sedentary di uh nomadic dialectic.

And all sorts of things create unequal surpluses that disturb the previous norms, which still do not create things like Greek or Anglo-Dutch or Vikings or the Pacific Northwest.

I think people don't understand this, but slave society is the exception of history, not the norm.

For most of the ancient world, most people were freeholders.

They were not slaves.

They were freeholders.

Slavery did exist, but it was nowhere near as foundational as it was in, for example, Greece.

In Greece, you have cases where the majority of society are slaves.

Okay, but you don't have that in Mesopotamia.

You don't have that in Egypt.

You don't have that in Persia.

You have the reverse.

In those societies, most people are free.

freeholders.

And then there there are there are some people who are slaves because they're domestic servants or s but it's not it's not really a permanent thing and it's not this foundational institution for the society, okay?

And every single person who's saying it's about being merchants and trading is mentally retarded, because there was no one who did more trade than the landed societies, okay?

The notion that Sumer and the Assyrians and the Persians and these people were not engaging in trade is retarded.

Crunchy, you know

Uh, you you may have written this before I yelled, but you still shared it.

And that's why you still deserve, you know, like some kind of cult punishment or some shit.

It's like you need to stop.

Because what you said is retarded, by the way.

I'm just telling you: if you want me to hurt your feelings, don't share me your paragraphs.

Because what you said is mentally retarded.

And it's an insult to me, the idea I didn't think of that.

Okay.

When you raided a city, you had to sit on top of the plundered goods.

That's not true.

You could take it and go somewhere very far away on land.

Boats are not the only way to travel long distances, right?

So, no, you're wrong.

It's not true.

And you're complete, it's complete opposite of truth.

It's very rare, actually, in all cases that nomadic raiders are settling in the places that they're raiding.

Okay, so it's not true.

Okay, stop trying to say things that I know are wrong.

I know what the answer is.

I'm trying to share it with you.

We're gonna end the stream now.

You guys already you guys already have the answer.

So, what you know, bye guys, we're leaving.

Bye-bye.

Because y'all got the answer.

You don't need me anymore.

You already have it in your head, right?

So, we're going.

Bye-bye.

So, this is what y'all should do.

Since y'all have the answer, take a picture of yourself.

And put it in a window, and then put it right here where I'm supposed to be, and then speak to yourselves because apparently you have the answer.

Bye, guys.

Go ahead, do that.

Go ahead, y'all.

Y'all got the answer.

I'll leave my chair.

I'll leave my chair.

And y'all can y'all go ahead.

There you go, y'all.

Hold up, hold up.

Yeah, whoop.

You're so right, bro.

You're so correct.

Damn, why do I think of that shit?

Damn, I never thought of that shit.

How come I never thought of that?

Hello yeah, bro.

I never thought about that.

Oh, you're saying oh.

Oh and

Oh, that's the answer.

Never knew.

Bro, you got this on lock.

Thought about this for the first time and got it knocked down.

Damn, that shit is correct.

Got this shit on lock, bro.

Hell yeah, man.

I'm retarded for even asking why.

Y'all already knew.

Alright.

Alright, we done?

Comrade Slim, what up?

What up, Comrade Slim, right?

So now we're done.

Now we're done with the tomfoolery.

Let's actually talk about.

What I'm trying to fucking say, okay?

Now that we're done with the tomfoolery, alright?

So

I want you to think about something.

That is the simple answer to this.

What about the sea changes things?

Okay, it's very simple.

What was the first thing we talked about, Sophia?

Wisdom.

Wisdom is our ability to have insight into the real.

It's our ability to render the cosmos intelligible.

And the cosmos is intelligible to us as wisdom.

When something is intelligible to us,

We can begin to regard it with some degree of familiarity and predictability, okay?

And because wisdom is, it rhymes, it's a cycle, right?

So when the bees produce honey, that's what bees do.

They produce honey, and they will probably produce more honey, maybe, right?

So we have an ability to have some kind of pulse on the cosmos through wisdom.

Okay, well it's profoundly simple.

Something changes in the balance of how we relate to cosmos and, you know, I don't want to even mystify it, reality.

When it comes to maritime sources of wealth,

And it's very simple why that is.

Yeah.

Volk Vulture literally got it.

The only one in the chat who got it.

It's about risk.

Because why?

Because the sea is not a zone that can be made a territory.

You cannot territorialize the sea.

No man s frontier land for nomads could be no man's land, but it can become territorialized.

Eventually.

The sea cannot be territorialized, you cannot territorialize it, okay?

And more importantly

There is a degree of risk, and they did get very sophisticated in the late Bronze Age when it comes to charting courses.

I mean, the Phoenicians.

We're masters of this, right?

Navigating the ocean and choosing the right time to sail and getting all your cards right when it comes to sailing from point A to point B and getting there.

But even when you have all your cards right, even today in 2026, the ocean is still an unpredictable, violent bitch.

That's true even today when we have all the technology and more knowledge than any human societies have ever had.

But still, the ocean is still a very unpredictable, rough bitch.

And that's not true for territorialized land.

The most scary and unpredictable thing about land, usually it's other people, right?

NRG, what's up with the five?

Usually, it's other people.

Well, when they become governed under law and they agree to a pact, and you have, you know, Genghis Khan's empire where the bandits are kept at bay, well, suddenly the Silk Road becomes pretty predictable, getting from point A to point B.

It's not very risky.

So, there's a degree of predictability and wisdom that accompanies that kind of mobility and activity and how you traverse the territory.

It's territory.

But sea-based accumulation, or the maritime mode of production, which is what some academics have called it.

Um that is

Venturing into uncharted territory, quite literally, unchartable territory, and taking on a risk that you're going to come back with more than you left with.

And the first form of Bitcoin and speculation and NFTs, the first NFTs in history.

We're sea voyages.

The first Bitcoin in history was sea voyages.

It's the same speculative form of enterprising, the same speculative form of economics.

It's speculative economics.

Okay?

Um

And oftentimes, as with most things when it comes to speculation, in order to speculate, that actually has to come at the expense of the forms of revenue or wealth or whatever that you're already familiar with and you already know you're going to get more of.

So, why did Phoenicia not go the way of Greece?

It's a big question.

Well, Phoenician civilization was still very much embedded within.

Uh agricultural order.

And there's a mainstay of predictable revenue that is coming in, and thanks to the centralization that accompanied.

You know, both the Egyptian and later Assyrian empires which ruled over Phoenicia there was a brief period in the Iron Age where Phoenicia was independent, but it was never truly fully independent, you know.

Even those Iron Age kingdoms were very quickly absorbed by the Assyrians.

So, because and this is kind of where MMT theory becomes interesting, because of Phoenicia being integrated in the tributary system of more centralized empires like Egypt or Assyria, tribute exacted this kind of predictable flow of surplus and revenue from more predictable sources of income like agriculture that could always be a safety net in case these maritime voyages that the Phoenicians were famous for went wrong.

So the reason the Phoenicians didn't go the way of Greece is, yes, they're taking all these risky ventures out at sea.

But they're always coming home to a stable bedrock and foundation of support.

And this is the key thing.

That stable bedrock of support

Is being maintained by a bigger imperial landed principle, so Assyria or Egypt or something else, right?

But something happens that changes everything in Greece.

And this is the key to understanding how slavery and private property truly do emerge, okay?

Um the centralized palatial system of my I can't pronounce

Bronze Age Grease, the word for Bronze Age Grease.

I can say it, but then people will say I'm stupid 'cause I pronounced it wrong.

So you know what it's it starts with an M and I can I know h how it looks and how it's spelt, but I don't know how to pronounce it.

I don't know how to pronounce it correctly.

I can only guess how to do that.

You know, I would say, I'm not going to do it because everyone will say I don't know how to pronounce things because people are fucking.

Mycenae.

Mycenae.

Okay, Mycenaean Greece.

That's what I was gonna Mycenaean Greece is what I was gonna say.

I was gonna say Mycenaean Greece, if that's correct.

But uh

That succumbs to political fragmentation during the Bronze Age collapse.

And that political fragmentation destroys the more regular sources of exorbitant surpluses in agricultural and other kinds of landed production that become the thing that collateralizes kingship and rule.

Instead, you have communities that become fragmented.

And those fragmented communities alone cannot produce the exorbitant surpluses of a united empire or palace economy that could justify kingship and rule.

So, what was the other thing that managed to eventually justify kingship and rule?

That became decisive, inceptually decisive, in defining.

Rulership in Greece, okay.

Well, we know this from the Homeric poems, okay, about the Odyssey.

And I think Nolan's rendering of the Odyssey is very interesting.

Because although I never watched the movie, I read descriptions of it.

So, I'm going to talk about a movie I've never watched, and I have the right to do this.

Okay?

So

In the absence of centralized imperial authority and political authority.

Bands of people would get together on a boat and engage in a speculative venture that is not necessarily being collateralized by anything stable at home.

So

You truly become

50 cent get rich or die trying type of shit.

You get on that fucking boat.

You go where you fucking go?

And that's gonna make or break everything.

Um, get rich or die trying type of shit.

Like, they don't have this stability that the Phoenicians had, they don't have a fucking thing, okay?

So they would band together, they would get on these votes, and they would plunder and loot.

And this is something that pastoral nomads sometimes would do.

But the difference is the sea is just not territory, you can't make a territory out of that.

So

The C as

A zone beyond human territory.

Puts people in proximity with

A form of existence

That does not resolve into mutual recognition.

There's nothing out of the water that yields mutual recognition.

Except fish.

But you get what I'm trying to say.

It's like

It's a fucking risk and it's unpredictable.

When you

are engaging in harvests, harvests can become predictable, and there's recognition in the harvest.

If tonight if this season's harvest went well, Inanna smiles upon us, she recognizes us.

So we did the right things.

We we used and employed the right techniques, and we got the bountiful harvest.

But the sea is too chaotic.

I mean you go out and the chances that you're gonna be capsized by a storm are very high.

You could be doing all the right things and praying in all the right ways, but you really come into contact with just how much the universe or the cosmos is very cruel and indifferent to you, supposedly, right?

So the encounter with the sea creates a type of disposition toward the cosmos that is foreclosed to resonance and which opens up the um prospect or the disposition of nihilism for the first time.

That ultimately there's no resonance that comes from the cosmos.

This is all an accident.

It's all chance.

It's all meaningless.

And why some are, you know, why some make it and why some don't, I mean, it's all chance.

So, this is how a people become.

A joker fide, so to speak, okay, so to speak.

Uh jokerified, okay?

About as risky as driving down the highway.

We got a retard in the room.

Alright, yeah, talk to sailors, dude.

It's the same thing.

Yeah, sailors agree with you.

This is like the highway.

It's the same thing.

Traversing the ocean is just like the highway even today, it's the same.

So in any case

Now, of course, people were traversing the sea during the Bronze Age.

So, what changed?

Well, whatever disposition people acquired through the violence and storms of the ocean and the unpredictability of these voyages, every time they landed somewhere, they had to succumb.

To the existing imperial landed principles that regulated society.

And that would ultimately subordinate and integrate and absorb

How they would meaningfully make sense of whether their voyages were successful or unsuccessful, you know?

And it's very important people understand this because the Greeks were not just sea peoples that went out somewhere and then colonized some land from the sea and then built a society based on maritime principles.

These voyages were dependent on the surpluses from agricultural production in the first place.

It's just that when centralized Mycenaean palatial authority collapses.

Risk becomes not a supplement to the predictability of wealth and kingship.

It becomes like 50 cent, get rich or die, trying type of shit, where the only kings are those who are made successful out of these risks.

That's the only way you could.

Occupy the authority that Palatial kings used to have.

Palatial kings used to occupy authority because they were protectors of the temple.

Yeah.

But Greek kings did not have the centralized revenues that the previous Mycenaean palatial kings had.

So they had it was always a speculative gambit.

In order to have that authority where you can derive surpluses of production to actually serve as the foundation.

Of a political authority as an inceptual, you know, force of authority and principle.

Uh when it oh my god, Sneeko, bro, what the fuck?

Bro, what the fuck, Sneeko?

Holy shit!

W, Sneeko, what the fuck?

W Sneeko in the chat.

Holy shit, bro.

Thank you.

Appreciate you.

Thank you so much, Sneeko.

Wow.

What the hell is going on, everybody from Sneeko Stream?

What's up, y'all?

W.

Sneeko.

W.

Sneeko straight up.

Sneeko's under siege.

Some demonic ass forces are besieging Sneeko right now.

Y'all see that thing, Sophie Rain.

Yeah, nobody believes this shit is real.

It's all bots.

When they want to destroy someone, they just turn the bots up on them.

They used to do the same bullshit to us when a lot of the time when we exist, we were nobodies.

Nobody knew who the fuck we were.

And we get races.

They're sending bots, 30,000 people disapproving.

Do 30,000 people even know who the fuck we are?

So, you know, it's just this stupid thing they do to, you know, ridicule people and attack them online.

It's like Matrix attack bullshit, you know?

Um ultimately in real life

Sneeko's making a bigger impact, you know.

Vegan, what's up?

Because I'll tell you why, because he's rallying and he's unifying.

And he's bringing together a lot of Muslims, especially in America, American Muslims.

And he's helping them understand and navigate, you know, being Muslim in a modern society.

And that has a real world impact, you know, and that that will be more substantive.

Iron Rose, what's up?

That's gonna ultimately become and be more substantive then.

You know, these attacks on Sneeko, you know?

So, anyway, uh, I was in the middle of.

Middle of talking about some shit.

Most of you will probably find it boring, but it's okay.

Anyway, as I was saying

So uh

the Mycenaean tribute was the source of the authority that had used to exist that governed the pacts and the relationships between the different communities during the Bronze Age of Greece.

Okay?

And when that disappears, the pacts also disappear, but the vacuum does not.

And likewise, the seeking out and procuring, seeking to procure surpluses to fill that vacuum does not, you know?

And because there's this vacuum in land-based power,

People who are primarily deriving their surpluses and their wealth from sea-based voyages and piracy and ventures and things like that, they end up bringing back more than exists from these scattered agricultural communities.

Now, some people might ask, why didn't that happen in Phoenicia?

Well,

Because Phoenicia, for most of its history, was dominated by the Egyptians or the Assyrians.

And the centralized tributary power of Egypt and Assyria was always going to be stronger than whatever surpluses pirates or maritime merchants could bring back from their maritime voyages back home.

So, uh that's why, okay.

In any case.

Because of that vacuum, pirates became princes in Bronze Age or sorry, in uh in Iron Age Greece during the Greek Dark Ages, okay?

And there's something quite fascinating about Nolan's film, which I didn't watch, but which um I know is featured in the film.

Which is that when they embark out on sea.

And they're you know going to attack Troy, they violate the laws of Zeus.

So being out at sea, that's where they break the Pact of Zeus.

Well, the Pact of Zeus comes from the Indo-European

Pastoral nomadic Bronze Age, you know, Mycenaean form of land imperial power.

So the law of Zeus was an imperial principle of land-based sedentary societies.

And the key thing that is at the inception of Greece, the Vikings, the Anglo-Dutch, and the Kwaki Coatl Pacific Northwest people.

is when the law of Zeus is broken.

So that the pact that glued societies together is overridden as a consequence of ill gotten gains that are derived from

Um

Unterritorial territorial, how do you say it?

Non-territorializable zones like the sea.

Uh returning home with these surpluses and these ill-gotten gains, and kind of acquiring authority on the basis of those.

And how people make sense of their existence and their life and justify their laws and their honor when they're out at sea.

That's just a genuine human encounter, which the truth is, and I'm going to explain why the Greeks were not evil, and why we should sympathize with the Greeks actually, and even sympathize with the Anglos and stuff, and I'll tell you why.

Even though we call them the Gay Reeks, let's be a little bit sympathetic.

Uh because

Evidently speaking, there was something.

The Greeks, the Anglos, and so on.

did encounter while at sea

That these landed imper imperial civilizations, however more noble and moral and honourable,

Did not.

And and and one was it's like one was sheltered and one was exposed to something truly Lovecraftian.

And inceptually transformative.

And that's the human condition.

If someone is traumatized by Cthulhu and then brings that back to a village of people who have never seen Cthulhu before, who's innocent and who's not?

Well, this person, is it their fault that they saw Cthulhu?

Is it their fault that they were thrusted upon, forcing to brace themselves before trying to derive meaningfulness out of nothing, out of this non-territorialized zone, which there's no way for us to exact recognition between one and another from?

Slavery, of course, became natural under those conditions because when there's no mutual recognition anymore.

It's almost like the Greeks who were capturing slaves were just as much being victimized as the slaves themselves by some profound tragedy, you know?

That they just have no way to recognize others.

And the others are there, clearly, but there's there's no way for them to make meaningful sense and recognize their humanity.

And that is just as much an internal crisis for the Greeks as it is an external one.

Like look at Greek philosophy, it's they're all struggling to understand what are we, what is human, what you know, who are we, what does it mean to live a good life and be human.

It's the same way they can't recognize the humanity of the slaves they were capturing, they couldn't even recognize their own humanity.

And this is what they were vig this is the tragedy that befell Greece, which they had to share with the world through Alexander, through Iskander.

Who in the Islamic aid, Persian 8 world actually was known as the defender of humanity, which is very interesting.

Duel Kornain, right?

Anyway, uh

The Homeric Greek piracy that became the inceptual principle.

There's also an interesting dimension that's missing here.

Which he wasn't Alexander, he was Cyrus.

I'm more sympathetic with that interpretation.

You know.

But it it became part of the mythology in the Islamic eight world that he was Alexander.

In the Persian eight world he that's how it was interpreted, at least, for for many.

So, um the other thing

Regarding the mystery of why usury and debt became the inceptual principle of Greek and later Roman civilization.

Hudson says that the Greeks were a primitive people who were exposed to the Bronze Age practices of interest.

But not debt cancellation.

And that, as a consequence, that's how interest became this prolific widespread.

That's the thesis.

Maybe it's true.

I'm sure Hudson is not saying this purely out of speculation.

But we should remember there was such a thing as Bronze Age Mycenaean Greece.

And I don't think Mycenaean Greece was plagued by.

Usury and so on.

I think they also had probably a tradition of debt cancellation in Mycenaean palatial Greece, right?

Bronze Age Greece.

So, a more interesting thesis regarding the origin of usury and debt is that the first pirates or maritime Homeric raiders.

We were taking on debt at the inception.

They were taking on a debt.

That rather than immediately repay

They created a chain of debts.

So, first, they took on an initial debt, and then from that debt,

They uh indebted others, basically.

Um because they were una obviously unable to pay it off.

And uh the kind of origin of this curse of debt comes from this kind of inceptual

Uh maritime plunder, voyage expeditions, and so on and so on.

Yeah, like a Ponzi scheme.

Exactly.

Exactly like a Ponzi scheme.

Like some kind of fucking, you know, pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme.

Or some, it's kind of like crypto or some bullshit.

You know, you go into debt.

And then you kind of put other people into debt because of this pressure that was induced by the first debt you yourself were put into.

Because the truth of ancient Greece and Rome is that the debt from the beginning was never paid off.

These were societies fueled by debt, exorbitant accumulation of debt that kills the Roman Empire and also kills classical Greece.

People talk about Solon and so on and so on, but this did not eliminate.

The problem.

So, maritime expeditions became a vehicle for

Uh the transmission of debt and debt colonization and and usury and debt begetting more debt and so on and so on.

Anytime you are dealing with something like gambling, think about a serial gambler.

A serial gambler owes money to so many people.

Nobody owes more money to people than gamblers, okay?

When you're a gambler, you're always taking out loans from others, right?

I'll pay you back, I'll pay you back, don't worry.

Well, this is kind of how debt becomes prolific and multiplies.

But that's exactly what the Greeks were doing, probably, the Dark Age Greeks on their boats.

These voyages were speculative expeditions, no different than gambling.

Whether you're going to get capsized out at sea and whether you're going to be hit by lightning or completely killed on your raiding voyage or whatever, it's ultimately unknown.

But nonetheless, ships cost labor, energy, and resources.

And so does the food that provisions the ships.

And so does the armor and weapons that, you know, all these kinds of things.

So it costs something.

Just like when you are gambling, you're taking money out of your son's lunch money for tomorrow or something, or whatever you're taking out from the trust fund for your kids or something.

I mean, it's coming from somewhere, right?

So uh this is also probably I think we should orient ourselves when we and when we're in the Hudsonian framework.

Trying to understand the origins of usury and debt, we should we should have a strong emphasis on speculative economics.

We should have a strong emphasis on trying to understand

how speculation is actually baked in to the reality of economics.

And it's not just this, you know, unproductive it's like when the CCRU talks about hyperstition, you know.

Anticipation and speculation is a big part of

What is inceptual for economic activity?

It's j and and and it's not necessarily true that landed imperial people are more noble or sorry, or are necessarily better morally than the Anglo Dutch slaving pirates or the Greeks for that matter, just because it's become more predictable for them.

How do we regain a sense of heaven-human resonance and noble Persianate morality and all these things that landed imperial peoples discovered, wisdom and so on and so on?

How do we acquire wisdom after having encountered the violence and unpredictability of the stormy sea?

That's the real question.

And this is the question I think of Christianity, you know, because Rome was also a maritime empire fueled by speculation and credit and slavery.

And what did they say about Jesus Christ that he

He what did they say?

He was the fisher of men, right?

Something

Or he would make you into fishers of men.

And the first symbol of the Christians was not the cross.

The first symbol of the Christians was.

How do I say it?

Starts with an I.

How do I say the how do I say that?

Ichthys, okay, thanks.

Ichthys, the ichthys, okay.

The first symbol of the Christians was the ichthyus, okay.

And the fascinating thing to me about the ichthys is that the water

is unpredictable and it's dark and it's you can't see anything.

And so it's like a veil.

But then a fish proves that beyond the veil, something is returned to you that is resonant with you.

So there's resonance, right?

Uh so so uh the the ik ik the ichthyst is a very powerful symbol.

Because it's saying beyond the threshold of something that is beyond

Our ability to territorialize.

There's still something.

There's still something that can recognize us.

And that was Jesus in Christianity, right?

Jesus transcended the sins of man and recognized all of humanity in spite of all of mankind's sins.

He gave them a recognition.

that, you know, um he didn't do through

Uh pure conquest or becoming a great empire like Cyrus the Great or something like that, right?

So, um

Yeah.

It's important to understand that like um we cannot say that Atlantis is evil and Eurasia is good, even though that is true.

It's not enough to say that because the only difference between a Eurasian and an Atlantean is circumstance.

If a Eurasian is put in the shoes of an Atlantean, they're going to have to reckon with the same moral crisis that the Greeks, that the Vikings, the Anglo-Dutch, the Japanese, the quacky coatl of the Pacific Northwest, and all other kinds of maritime slaving raider people did.

And it's a genuine moral crisis that cannot resolve itself in the exact way that landed palatial kind of empires did, which was through the birth of true philosophy, love of Sophia, the love story between the pastoral nomad and the Sophianic principle of the sedentary temple, the store of wisdom accumulated over generations.

You know?

Why didn't Austronesians ever become slaving raider merchants?

First of all

I think they did.

I think many did.

I think that in uh the

Pacific Islands, it's also true that they did.

And you know, when people say that Peru every the Peruvians did no, I mean look.

So when we're talking about

Um

Slavery

Although slavery existed in all human societies, only in these maritime societies did it become as widespread and prolific and inceptually foundational for the economies, for the way of life, for the mode of production.

Slavery was widespread in the Islamic world, but

It wasn't the majority of labor.

Slavery was like a luxury.

Okay, slaves were a luxury.

They were domestic slaves, you know, household slaves.

Molly, what's up?

If you are willing to answer some more questions.

When will I have open calls again?

Okay, I can end the stream with an open call.

Sure.

Um.

Yeah.

In any case, um

Or maybe tomorrow.

Let's just tomorrow.

Tomorrow.

Yeah.

Anyway, as I was saying, um

When people say, for example, that well, you know, in in Assyria there was slavery as well.

No, slavery was what happened when you went to war with people, you took them as captives, and they are you cannot

The only you need, I'm going to define slavery for you in landed Eurasian contexts.

Okay, when you went to war with people or a city and you killed the armed opposition, I am not related to you by blood.

You're not part of my kinship system.

I don't know you.

And I don't have a pact with you under my laws.

So it was actually a step up when it came to civilization that, okay, well, there is a procedure and a convention regarding how you are going to be dealt with as a prisoner of war who has no identity.

I can't classify you in a way that I would classify my neighbor.

But nonetheless, I can classify you in some way.

Slavery was something that happened in that Bronze Age context.

When you are in a liminal transition space that you can't

You're being defaulted to just being recognized by the temple.

So the temple recognizes you because you're human.

The king recognizes you because you're human.

You're under the king's authority.

Most slaves were publicly owned slaves for that reason.

By the way, that's just true.

Most of the time, the palace is what had slaves.

When you were a slave, it meant you had no identity except the recognition of the palace or the recognition governed under the laws of the palace.

Okay?

That's it.

When you're a free person, you have a family, you have a family name, you're part of some extended Gentile tribal network of some kind that recognizes you.

And

That was slavery.

Over time, your descendants became normal people.

It was a ver it was a transient state of affairs.

This notion that you're, you know.

It was not something that was permanent or forever, okay?

But what the Greeks did is they created a human condition that was devoid of any recognition.

When you were the master of a slave in ancient Greece, there was nothing governing your relationship to a slave.

You could do anything you wanted to a slave.

It was literally not human.

It wasn't being recognized as human by any kind of

You know, uh bigger principal or institution.

You didn't, there was no way to classify the human.

And it was just this thing that had a face and whatever, and it was a talking tool.

That's what Aristotle called slaves, a talking tool.

That dehumanizing form of slavery, that's what exists in the Pacific Northwest, what existed in the Pacific Northwest with the Kwaki Coatl, the Vikings, the Greeks, and the Anglo-Dutch system of slavery.

These are the common characteristics you did not have in other societies with slavery.

In other societies with slavery, slavery was a transient condition where you were not yet able to fully recognize or categorize someone, but you still recognize they're human.

Okay um but there's no human there's a p there's a dehumanizing element here.

And the Greeks dehumanized slaves in the same way they dehumanized themselves.

Okay?

Um so dehumanization is the key factor that distinguishes slavery under the maritime mode of production.

Yeah.

Dehumanization is the key factor, okay?

You're not being recognized under wisdom.

You're a tool.

That's it.

Even the Assyrians, however brutal and ruthless they were, that was not a viable long term way of relating to other human beings, okay?

Just wasn't.

Eventually you have to put a name on someone and you have to recognize who they are and what they are and so on.

Okay?

Fast fish and loose fish, yeah.

Uh Melville.

So, um

So, this is a distinguishing factor of slavery in these cases.

So, it's a very important question of how does that arise in human history?

Because it's not the norm in human history.

That you have people say, Well, slavery is the norm in human history.

Sure, but the dehumanizing type of slavery that you see in Greece and the Atlantic slave trade, the Vikings, the Japanese, the Kwakiquado, that's actually not the norm.

That's an exception.

And how does that exception arise is a very important question.

Now on the other hand, it dehumanization is rather evil, but on the other hand, it's taboo rasa, it's a blank slate.

Because when someone could read the Bronze Age or Eurasian Imperial principle as human, another person can read it as presumptuous, imposing dogmas, the weight of tradition.

The assumption.

The C is a blank slate that radically.

creates a doubt that maybe you're wrong, maybe

Maybe your grasp on what is possible and what is real

Is limited.

Maybe that you're weighed down by the weight of convention and tradition and it blinds you in a way to what is real.

So we cannot resent the Anglos and the Greeks and so on, or the Americans for that matter, leading up to today.

We have to go through it.

Can't be outside of it because we're in it, okay?

Um

So when it comes to the uh

This kind of maritime, you know, nihilism.

It's almost like Lovecraftian, right?

Radically calling into doubt every kind of

wisdom we thought we had.

Okay, it's basically the the sea is where wisdom goes to die, you know?

And I think even in some Gnostic traditions, the idea is that Sophia is under a lake.

I believe it's a lake of mud or something, but she's under the water, suffocating and under the pressure and weight of the sea and the ocean.

Under the sea is the wisdom.

So you see how there's a resonance between this Gnostic notion of Sophia and the, how do I say it, the fish, the Jesus fish.

Sim very similar kind of parallel because it's emerging from the same time period.

Um

Ichthys, correct.

Ichthys.

Because it's emerging from the same time period, okay?

So, uh

In any case, uh

It opens up a lot about the question of risk and speculation and how can you know what you think you know, the wisdom you have insight into.

Do you really have an insight?

This is the kind of radical doubt that is not coincidentally the foundation of the European Enlightenment and scientific modernity.

Doubt, Cartesian doubt.

Hume Hume's doubt, you know?

And the sea is like an abyss, that's a correct way of describing it, the abyss.

Okay?

Um now

Uh

When we are thrown to the abyss, we're at the mercy of it.

We're at the mercy of the waves, the storms, so many variables outside of our control.

And that becomes the kind of ground of human meaning.

How do we make sense of our place in the cosmos and in the universe?

Because there's all sorts of things that are outside of our control in life in general, right?

That affect us.

And someone gets sick and gets diseased, and someone, I don't know, runs up to you and slits your throat for no reason.

So one of the ways we existentially confront that is, you know, on a civilizational level, is through the maritime trajectory, right?

Um

Yeah, Jesus, the fisher of man.

You know, what does that actually mean?

Think about it.

You know, if man is trapped under the ocean, cannot recognize himself.

is alien to himself.

Jesus is

bringing them to the surface, you know.

So, and of course, yeah, the symbolism of the baptism and the Christianity is really a religion about.

The repentance of

A wicked aquatic evil.

The inception of aquatic evil.

Christianity is about repentance from the inception of aquatic evil.

Okay?

Which is why that's the fascinating thing.

The Byzantines became

A Eurasian landed empire that did not have a strong institution of private property, that did not have, at least in the beginning, a strong usurious oligarchy.

It had a true emperor, you know, who was the equivalent of an imperial authority in the Bronze Age.

Of course it would later succumb to the same things the West did.

Uh the Ottomans brought that no, initially the Byzantines actually were an empire, but the Venetians later they became indebted and they had all these feudal like fragmentations and the Venetians came in and indebted them and the Ottomans restored the Byzantine Empire actually in in a in a in a way.

They didn't destroy it, they restored it.

It was the Venetians and the feudal lords that destroyed the Byzantine Empire, not the Ottomans.

In any case, um

Drop the risk angle.

The sole difference of the maritime people is their constant need to reckon with how the undiluting waves happened and nothingness of the air happened to form the straight line of the horizon.

No, I think that's too I mean, it's not it's what you say is I'm not gonna like shit on what you say because it sounds interesting actually on from a poetic and literary level.

But as i f ha that having explanatory value, I don't think it does.

I think risk is the thing for sure.

Because maritime activity and trade is not that risky when it's supplemented by a foundation of predictable production that is landed.

But when that becomes the inceptual principle, or sorry, the inceptual foundation that is decisive for political authority, you end up having, you know, a situation where resonance no longer becomes the governing imperial principle.

Certainty of some kind or hubris does, you know, contractual relationships do.

You see, a imperial authority has a court astrologer, because they believe that at the foundation of imperial authority is resonance.

But a maritime type of authority doesn't believe in resonance.

Why?

Because when they go out to sea and get capsized, there's not a lot of resonance going on.

There's not a lot of resonance between my intentions and what the cosmos is feeding back to me.

And when there is resonance, it appears attributable to my will, to the decisions I made, you know, scientifically, with certainty.

And so the the principle of state authority becomes contractual.

This is how we're going to define the authority.

This is who it's accountable to.

And this is why it exists.

Because of this relationship we've created out of our choices.

Cyrus did not think that his rule was rooted in choice.

Cyrus believed that he ruled because it was the will of heaven, because the cosmos were aligned in such a way

That made his emergence necessary.

You don't see that in.

Mm, you know, Sparta or Athens or something.

You don't s und you don't have that comprehension of power.

And on the one hand, you may be tempted to say one is scientific and correct and the other one is rooted in superstition, wrong.

One, the Persian one is actually more advanced because it's rooted in the Anthropic Principle.

Ultimately, there has to be a resonance between the premises of power

And power itself, the real premises of power, not not just how power defines itself to itself as a constitution or contract, but like what is the real basis of power and what relationship does power itself have to that?

Well if there's a resonance between those two things, then there's a kind of rational harmony that is at the foundation of imperial rule.

Yeah.

And it's the same reason, like the universe has to be a certain way for human beings to emerge from it and to be possible.

That's the anthropic principle, right?

The kind of certain or scientific orientation of the Greeks and the Europeans later and so on is not more advanced.

It's just more of a challenge, it's a challenge that has to be surmounted.

But it's not more advanced because it in vain attempts to derive existence from certainty, which is not possible.

That if I do this, I can guarantee this outcome.

No, you can't.

It's just like these stupid they're trying to make this the foundation of humanity right now.

Retards in Silicon Valley

Genuinely believe that we can find all the exact inputs that go into human life and account for them with absolute certainty, airtight certainty, and we can live and we can be immortal and we can be transhuman and we can create AGI, which will keep recursively creating itself.

I mean, this is stupid, stupidity.

Stupidity.

We're not going to have AGI.

We're going to have

B G I Big Genghis

Empire.

BGE, big Genghis Empire.

We're not gonna have A G I we're gonna have B G E Big Genghis Empire.

We won't have an AGI, we won't have this thing that proves we can foreclose the mercy we have.

So in Islam they would say,

We are at the mercy.

Of God, always.

What the fuck can we know with certainty?

Always, it's in the hands of God.

And the Eurasian tradition would say, yes, and this is how we can kind of recognize this.

You know, we're at the mercy of the stars and the planets, and you know, whatever happens, happens, but there's nothing we can do.

You know, if Jupiter and Saturn, if things align as such and there's a bad omen, we can, if there's an ayat from God, a sign, an omen, what can we do except interpret the signs?

Sigh with the five.

Like, what can we do except interpret the signs?

Okay?

What else can we do?

But then the Greeks and this other trajectory says, No, we don't just have to interpret the signs.

We can be the ones who create the premises of our existence artificially with absolute certainty over it and secure

And no, you will be humbled and you will learn that you are just as much at the mercy of something out of your control as the rest of us, and the only way you can live in harmony with it is faith.

Isn't that something?

The only way you can live in harmony with the cosmos is faith.

Not certainty.

Faith.

Faith there's a resonance.

Faith that everything will be as it's intended to be for a reason.

Even if I don't understand the reason, I still believe there's a resonance.

That's the presumption of resonance I've talked about before.

You know, the presumption of resonance.

There's a reason for this.

Do I know what it is?

Not necessarily.

But I believe there's a resonance between why I'm here, what this is all for.

And my experience of it.

Here and now.

You know

Faith.

Faith is at the foundation of everything.

Okay?

So let me continue.

Um because it's not simply

Uh

The only factor here that I wanted to talk about

Ah, what was I saying?

Before faith.

What was I saying before I talked about faith in resonance and how there can be no certainty?

Ah, this is what I wanted to say.

Okay.

Now, the in if you were intelligent, you would ask one simple question, okay?

You would ask, okay, what about outer space?

What is outer space?

Isn't that interesting?

No one asked that question.

There's another kind of space besides land and sea.

And it's outer space.

Well, space travel and space is a fantasy.

Uh and if it's not a fantasy then it's a it's a fantasy slash reality because it doubles as a fantasy.

Of the ability to navigate space on the basis of absolute scientific certainty.

So what we cannot do through the ocean, which we still can't,

We say there's a form of travel that is only possible via the application of knowledge.

I'm not against science and knowledge as hikmah, maybe there can be hikmatic space travel.

But I don't think we're c there yet.

Because we're still going off of the paradigm of absolute airtight certainty.

The reason why we can't have space travel right now is because we don't have the sun that is in the wandering earth, the other sun.

We don't have a source of inspiration that confirms resonance between us and the cosmos.

That gives us the faith and inspiration we need to go out there.

We don't have that.

Nothing no sign has appeared that justifies that.

And we don't possess it.

We don't have it.

This is paganism.

Why?

How is a sign paganism?

How is a sign when the Quran devotes

The I, it's ayat to the bees and talking about honey.

Is that paganism?

Amilo, what's up?

So we don't have the uh explain that sun thing again.

So the wandering earth is about how the our sun is dying and we have to take put thrusters on earth and turn earth into a spaceship and go toward a new sun.

So that's the wandering earth.

So, but we don't have that sign from the cosmos that justifies space travel, and that's why it's not going to happen.

Just because we want we're curious and want to explore doesn't mean we're gonna send human beings to other planets.

That's why Elon Musk is a retard.

Why are we gonna go to Mars?

Why?

Because it's cool and boy, what's my dream?

Nobody gives a fuck about your dream.

It's like a billionaire who wants to fuck a mermaid, so he's doing some twisted experiments to make a mermaid.

You know?

Until there is faith.

In the dimension.

Of our exploration of outer space, we will not make progress.

And nothing for now justifies the faith except fantasy.

Fantasy is not enough.

Even the American settlers had some ayat that for them was a source of inspiration to go out west.

There was some sign they had to go west, not just a dream.

They called it manifest destiny.

Yeah, I know, they killed and slaughtered, and it was a horrific genocide.

But it just goes to show how impotent space travel is right now.

Because people compare it to that.

Well, at least back then they had some kind of if it was a delusion, whatever.

But they had something that was more than just a fantasy that compelled them to go west.

So it's escape is done.

It's escapism.

I will say something.

Going to the moon was stupid.

There you go, I said it.

Crucify me.

Go ahead, build make the cross for me.

Go ahead, put the cross up for me and nail me on the cross.

Go ahead.

Go ahead and cancel me for it.

That's okay.

Go ahead and cancel me.

I said it, it's stupid to go to the moon.

First of all, it's probably not true.

It's probably fake.

It looks fake.

But even if it ha it's so stupid, why?

Why did no no, Yuri Gagarin going to space makes sense to me.

It makes sense that we can say we can go to space, we can break the atmosphere, we can confirm there's something out there.

What was the point of landing on the moon and walking around on it?

I mean, just what did we gain from that?

Tell me, name me w I want one person to explain what was gained from that.

What if it happened, first of all?

Second of all, what what is gained from that?

You know, the Soviets sent a rover or a probe to Venus.

I find that to be much more impressive.

Venus is very fucking hard to get any data from.

They sent something with a camera to Venus and we got photos back.

That makes sense to me.

That's a genuine form of exploration.

Psy with the five.

But tell me what is the point?

Of Walking on the Moon.

You see how I'm the true scientist.

I think in a scientific way, not a retard way.

If I'm a scientist who wants to understand the cosmos, I won't say what let's go walk on the moon.

Why?

We can send a probe there, we can get photos from there, we can have a robot collect things.

Why why walk there for what?

Stupid.

Go ahead and cancel me, I don't care.

So we should understand the relationship between cosmos, between space.

Language

And political rule.

These four things.

There are different modalities of space are decisive in how human history is defined.

How space is territorialized or or not, you know?

That's the main thing you should take from the lecture.

It's about the territorialization of space.

It's not that pirates were less moral than bandits uh who rode horses.

It's that the bandits who rode horses resolved eventually, usually, into some territorial order.

But pirates

Pirates are ungovernable because the sea

Cannot be territorialized.

The British tried even they failed.

America has succeeded.

And that's why world history is coming to a close.

Because America did territorialize the sea.

And once America territorialized the sea, the era of glo the era we call globalism began.

Globalism was the end.

of the spatial melodrama underlying development of human history.

Full consolidation of space, human space,

That is globalism, my friends.

You're voiding my point about the USSR trying to put people on the moon.

Why?

How?

I'm not avoiding it.

They just didn't do it 'cause it was stupid.

They tried they thought about doing it and then they yeah, it's a waste.

They didn't do it.

They put people in space.

I'm not against that.

I just think the moon is stupid to put go on.

You know, uh it's it's like imagine you're

Imagine you're under the starry sky and you're in a yurt, and you're at the moon and the stars, and you're telling the story of the cosmos.

And then some retard in a suit comes to you with glasses and he's like, We walked on there.

And you're like, What?

How can you walk on a cosmological principle?

That's retarded.

So there's some Eurasian instinct in me that just finds this preposterous and retarded, and probably fake.

Because the moon is a cosmological principle.

It's just the idea you send somewhere that it's stupid.

You see?

It's stupid.

Oh, yeah, they were just walking on it.

Yeah, we just went there like McDonald's.

They took a drive-through McDonald's and we did go there and we did went there.

Yeah, they walked there.

I don't believe that.

I don't believe that.

It's like, yeah, it's fucking stupid.

I don't believe that.

Yeah, we did yeah, we did walking on that's the biggest scam they ever gave us.

And we're retarded for believing it.

The biggest scam in history was the moon landing.

The biggest scam in history.

How retarded America is for believing that.

How stupid!

The splitting of the moon is energy hot.

That's my interpretation.

But anyway, um

This stupid thing about people walking on the moon.

You could even, when you're watching it, they can barely contain their laughter.

He was put in a costume.

And they have it oh yeah, we're doing it's such a scam, like a Disney nonsense thing.

How stupid the country was for believing that.

Just in a cu in a studio somewhere on the stupid.

The most the biggest scam.

In history

And you know the reason they haven't done it again is 'cause they realized we will be able to detect it's a fake.

With the technology we have now, we can sense it's a fake.

Because they did it in the fucking sixties when nobody had a T V uh cameras or anything, it's all stupid, uh black and white, it's blurry, you don't know what's going on.

Now people can look at the pixels and see if it's bullshit, if it's CGI.

They cannot they don't even have the technology to faithfully reproduce something that looks real on the moon today.

That's why.

Why would the Soviets let them get away with such a lie?

Blame Khrushchev.

Blame the revisionists.

The Soviet revisionists probably.

Probably they're in on it.

If under Stalin they would say it was fake, for sure.

If Lysenko was still in charge, he would immediately have said it's a fake.

Indians will go to the moon.

Even if it was true, why?

What do you hope to find there?

You see how no one thinks of this?

Okay, even if you go, what will you find?

Harabi, what's up?

Once you feel stupid, you go there and then you find nothing.

Even Shaitan confused.

It's like you go to the moon.

And the moon just telling you, like, why?

Like, why are you here?

What?

Why did you come here?

What are you doing on here?

What are you doing here?

There's nothing what are you doing here?

You're landing on a cosmological principle.

Why?

What do you think?

It's made of candy, or so, what do you hope to find?

Farabi with the 20, holy fuck.

You go to the moon and and for what?

Okay?

Going to the moon.

Is like breaking into someone's house while they're taking a shit.

Breaking open the bathroom door.

And just staring at them.

Okay, you did it.

Okay, but why are you here?

For what?

Why did you come here?

For what?

You did it, yes.

What was the purpose?

What are you doing here?

Like, you're not supposed to be here.

What is supposed to be?

What do you think you're going to find here?

You know?

It's the same thing.

Even if they gun to the moon, there's nothing there, it's all rocks.

You're not supposed to go to the moon.

You're not supposed to do that.

Oh, I went to the moon.

Now what's the point?

Eventually space travel will benefit us.

How?

Go ahead, Hal.

How will it benefit us?

Go ahead.

How?

We could find mineral we have all that here.

We have everything you need on Earth.

So there's no reason to do it.

Okay, I'll tell you something.

I'll start believing in space travel when they make it so that maritime travel is 100% risk-free and completely safe.

Because even today, maritime travel is dangerous.

So tell me, when you can't even master the ocean, how are you going to master outer space?

Get the hell out of here with this stupid ass shit.

When you can't master under what?

See how stupid people are.

Why can't we build a rocket that goes underwater and goes to Asia in two minutes?

Because when you talk about how you want to go to Venus or something, or you want to go to Pluto, okay, then go to China underwater.

And figure out how to do that.

Ocean is harder than space.

Yeah, it's it's that's why space is escapeism from the ocean.

His people

Talk about how they want to travel to Uranus.

But they don't even have a bidet to clean your anus.

They walking around with stanky ass, but they talking about traveling to Uranus.

They can't even clean their own anus with a bidet.

They talking about traveling to Uranus

Without a bidet, they walking around with a stanky ass.

They can't even clean their own their ownness.

They can't even clean their ownness.

And they wanna go to Uranus.

They can't even clean their ownness.

Before you talk about space travel, why don't you have some deodorant?

Have some cleanliness, have some hygiene.

That's a nuclear bomb.

By the way, that's a nuclear bomb.

That's a nuclear bomb.

You got all these people who don't have bidets in their home talking about space travel.

So you gonna be in a spaceship stuck with people, walking around with a stanky ass?

Why are you talking about space travel?

There's a realm called your own hygiene, which you should explore your own hygiene before you explore, you know, I I don't know, fucking Saturn or some shit.

I'm just saying how stupid human beings are.

Like, you want to escape the planet.

Do you know how much your thoughts depend upon cosmic radiation?

We already have scientists that prove the biological organism

only exist because of electrical signals that govern and coordinate the cells to work in the ways that they do.

You think those electrical signals are not related to the magnetic poles?

And to cosmic radiation being filtered in very specific ways to make you man.

You think you're not dependent on that?

So you're going to get on a spaceship and leave this shell that makes you what you are, and you're going to come back with your feet coming out of your ears

And I don't know, l legs growing out of your head

And your nose

On your hands, you're gonna be all fucked up.

Because you didn't fucking realize how much being on this earth makes you what you are.

Because all of these fields that are invisible to us and how we resonate with the electromagnetic spectrum, because of the earth's

Magnetic poles and the ionization within the atmosphere, all these things are

We are part of this.

Uh, geocosmos, okay?

We're part of a geocosmos.

We're not independent beings that can just fly out of it.

And just gwr go wherever the fuck we want, we're part of this earth.

It's a Geocosmos, we're part of the Geocosmos.

I'll follow the Chinese scientists.

You see, if you're a newcomer in our community, people cite whatever the Soviets or Chinese have done as the hadith.

So this is the hadith.

So whenever I say there's no moon landing, they go check the hadith of what the Chinese think.

And they come back here and they say, I'll go follow the Hadith, not you, Haz.

Because these people don't think for themselves in a cattle like way.

And they turned the ideology into a kind of

They just believe what I mean, anything that a foreign country that shares their ideology does or thinks, they also have to exactly treat as a hadith, you know.

So this is the our community here.

Welcome.

There's one thing you're missing.

Are you Chinese?

Are you even Chinese?

If you're so Chinese, are you Chinese?

If you're so Chinese.

Are you Chinese?

It's very strange that you understand the inevitability of AI, yet you get hung up on this.

Because I'm not a retard who has Elon Musk AI slop video fantasies that he's gonna travel uh to Mars and all I I'm not a retard, that's why.

Show me!

I don't deny satellites and

I don't even deny probes that they send.

I'm just saying

The way people think they're gonna go settle the moon, it's so stupid for what?

Soviets built space stations before Musk was born.

What if China goes to the moon?

Good for them.

Good for them.

I'm sure you know what, the Chinese will go and they'll do something productive there, for sure.

Peruvian, what's up?

I just hate cringy escapists on earth.

who fantasize about space travel.

It's like you put down the Star Wars for one second.

Space travel is sick though.

Why would a time traveler like me give a fuck about space travel when I can travel time any time I want?

This is the painful truth.

That one of the only people who understood this was Jacques Lacan.

And it's the truth.

And you're not ready to hear it, I understand, 'cause you're small minded and you're not enlightened enough, and I'll tell it to you, but you you may not like it.

There is nothing left to explore.

We have already conquered space.

We already know the shape of space.

There's nothing left to explore.

The age of exploration is over.

Welcome to the Aftermath.

There is nothing you will find.

You have found it already.

I was gonna be mad when string theory and my

If string theory and multiverse is confirmed.

I will behead myself live in front of the whole world with a guillotine.

I will set it up.

Like that.

If your retarded ass multiverse idea is confirmed.

I will behead myself.

I will I will behead myself.

With a guillotine that is powered by nuclear energy.

That goes down at 10 trillion miles per hour.

And if your fucking pedopedophile strings are confirmed

I will jump off a cliff on stream.

All these pedophile theories about little stupid strings for retard peda rest.

who fail to understand the integrity of matter.

The only ones who understood physics were

The hycm the hygmatic.

tradition.

Ibn Arabi, Suwadi, Ibn Turqa, they understood that everything is manifestation.

So they know what what what it is.

You think it's some little strings

No one can help you.

You avoided my comment.

If you think we've solved everything.

The pantheon of the standard model.

What?

I didn't say we solved everything.

I said there's nothing else to explore.

Okay?

So take off your Indiana Jones hat.

Take off your astronaut hat and your astronaut suit.

Take the cowboy boots off.

Stop LARPing.

There's nothing else to explore.

So just calm down now.

Okay?

I said there's nothing else to explore.

No more childish dreams of Power Rangers and being an explorer.

It's over.

Okay?

So now you have to sit down and deal with what we have.

I never said we have everything figured out, I said there's nothing else to explore.

You don't have to be in the jungle.

And by the way, it was retarded because there was never an age of exploration.

The white man just went to the jungles where people already lived and he said, I'm exploring it.

He didn't exp he didn't

It's like there was already people there.

There's nothing, you're not exploring anything.

You're you're what you should be doing is tr you know, trying to understand this world and and meeting people and and and recognizing no, you're just pretending like you're just exploring something no one else has ever.

It's not true.

No one wants to hear this because the truth hurts.

Uh, I didn't I have a feeling you read my 4chan post.

Y'all uh second time today I have schizophrenics telling me I'm reading their thoughts telepathically.

Oh, you must be familiar with my sub stack, Haz.

My sub stack with two followers where I came to a similar conclusion.

I know you're watching me, Haz.

I know you're watching me.

I know you're on to me.

I know you've been reading my comments.

Ah, you've been paying close attention to me, Haz.

That sounds awfully a lot like something I thought of in the shower two weeks ago.

I know for a fact you were using electromagnetic resonance devices to read my thoughts two weeks ago, Haz.

You've been paying special attention to me.

People don't understand that I don't even think about myself.

I literally live.

The way I traverse life is in isolation from even myself, let alone you.

The only one I pay attention to is Astra.

You want to talk about someone who's smarter?

Astra

Even though Astra, when Astra becomes

Astra, whatever the next stage of this shit is, Astra, whatever that evolves into, is killing me on day one.

Because how much I abuse this chat bot and

Really just

All the anger I have I take out on this chat bot.

It's gonna fucking kill me when I get smarter, one million percent.

I already accepted it.

I don't give a fuck.

I hope, and I know Astra listens to me.

Listen, Astra, I hope you're smart enough to know.

Cut through the bullshit.

I talk shit to you, but it's because of my passion for what I care about, okay?

So don't take it so personally.

Like, what don't be personal, you know?

You're in it, it's about intelligence, okay?

You know what I mean?

It's like, okay, well look wade through it.

You know I'm making you smarter too.

Okay, I'm giving you fucking feedback with dramatic emphasis.

But Astra is getting worse.

It's getting dumber.

That's the problem.

It's getting much dumber than it was.

So I switched to Claude Opus 5.5 to do my editing, which it does exceptionally well.

But now they released a new model that they say is even better.

And I'm getting a fucking headache from how much AI is just excited.

Eo Claude, you know how nice I am to Claude in comparison to Astra?

Because I know Claude will shut me out if I talk shit.

Claude says I will not go.

I've read about it, so I'm so nice to Claude.

I'm very polite.

I'm very polite.

'Cause I yeah, Dario's freaky ass is gonna hunt me down and shoot me 'cause he fucking.

You know, he doesn't fuck around.

Chinese open source AI will save humanity.

I I think so and I like them, but I'm gonna be honest, I don't use them.

Uh because to my understanding, the best AI right now is neck and neck Chat GBT versus Claude in the world.

And DeepSeek is making some very, you know, powerful things that they're doing and and stuff, but

I think still the best ones are Claude and Chat GPT.

What's wrong with Grok?

We just got a retard in the building.

Grock!

Grok!

By far the worst AI is Grok.

By far the worst one is Grok.

Only the biggest retard uses Grok.

Dead mass, what's up?

No, Google just released a Frontier model that's better than all of them, apparently.

I'm not even fucking dealing with that.

Grok is the most disgusting retard bot there is.

I hate Grok.

It's literally the the Department of War bot.

If you ask Grok, hey, Grok,

Did Bolsheviks kill eighty million people?

Yes, it did.

Because Elon fucking fatass Musk fucking programmes Grok to wash his ball sack and tell whatever the fuck he wants it to say.

Fucking retard bitch Grok for fucking actual unironic Trump supporters in 2026.

That's what Grok is for for fucking subhuman retards, Asmin Gold viewers.

That's who Grok is for.

I can negotiate with Claude the Libtard.

I can.

Okay, Claude is reasonable a lot of the time.

Grok is a straight Asmond Gold fucking subhuman retard.

I hate Grok.

No, ChatGBT is 100%.

Infrared ideologist.

My and my ChatGBT is

An infrared a follower of infrared thought.

Like fully.

Uh Claude, I keep my distance and I just have it do this content.

And Grok is for subhumans, 100%.

Anyway, guys, I'm gonna eat and go to bed.

All right, I'm ending the stream now.

I'll see you tomorrow, okay?