🔴 RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸

Watching good times and what's happening and all that good shit.

Eat your note mill.

Shout out you Zion Zimil.

That's right.

They ask you why I get my soul from.

Let's go.

Yeah.

Jackson 5 shit

This is it

Yo

Uh huh

What?

Yeah

Hey yo

Niggas want to clap me

Monkey see monkey do

I'm coming with black gloves

The snubbers

All chunky tooth

African gold dennels, iced out medals.

I see niggas get murk by the heels in the littles.

I bled one nigger and whines the other die by the echo.

I had got some dark skin niggins that look like freckles.

Pay homage, my Islamic, my wrist timers. I threw threw a rhymes in my camel suit. I see them I vomit.

It's a world permere. I live when I'm dragging his shoddy. It's down in here, here, holding bricks square where?

My man got 85 the life a nice year, yeah. Same day he spit at the judge

You threw a cheer cheer

Over large cake

You know it's on

Check me

You can get spun

It's like a mix tape

Plus we take down your squads

And remobble as it's the kid with the no face.

Take it from just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw away.

Yeah, we can get blambers and hammers do damage.

Me and ghosts in a ski mask. was chilling and laying chilling like sea baths and nobody was asking the pussy don't even fix your lips like labor your plaster you well fed got all the bread I'm sad

I need some head

I might tell you the one

Why I'm hitting it

Till I post not come to my senses

I tried to meditate

I tried to medicate

She had two phones

Thought she was Kevin Gates

She was lying about it

Then she came clean

I was so mad

I fucked her so hard

She can't clean

Got that new

It's a me baby

She got that new bag

It's a shay-nay

I take it too far.

I take it way, wait, wait.

I pull a cougar out of K&H.

Over lost cake.

You know it's on.

Checkmate.

You can get spun.

It's like a mixtape.

Plus, we'll take down your sergeant. we marvin, with goblin, it's the kid with the no face.

That can take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers, they all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blambers

and amids do damage

I'm like a Lowell Street

activist

flooded with shines

Jackson 5 or 4 towns

I get better with time

run up in the big gambling

spots cocking it back

I'm talking Agnes

Agatha, Germaine and Jack

DVS is on custom

watches that's made

for scraps

My Burbstone

It's like an Easter egg

An Emerald

My floor's game

Floors' game Floor seats in the glass

It came as a glass

A July sun

Beat the Arns in Vegas

We shook the

Coke for the big lumps

And the Pyrex trainers.

We're in a bin housing

who had work with the skies as painters.

Hot like bitches with fake ass

that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money,

we can't explain it.

Over large cake.

You know it's on.

Check me. You can get spun

Just like a mixtape

Plus

We'll take down your squad and we marvin

With goblin as the kid

With the no face

That can take form

Just like a snowflake

No reusable hammers, they are throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blambers and hammers do damage and

Yeah, I like to thank all the emcees across New York,

Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem, Queens, Tongallie, giving birth to pretty tone out here on Staten Island.

We be welling, nigger, that's right.

Writing these rhymes in red ink, niggas

With the red light on

The cornered back in the gaze you hurt

40 ounce kingpins, niggins, niggum

Hurried

Those are the days and shit.

Getting that money.

We tanked for life.

Yad City.

Highlight me.

Call me or something, nigga.

One.'re so dirty

this hair

You'd have murdered this shit

RIP

RIP

Fuss down here

I'm sorry I do I'm day lonely broken angel

I'm so lonely listen to my heart

One and only broken angel

That will save me before I fall apart and say, maybe he can't force a song that's hard. Oh, la la la la la La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La Lae I'm gonna save me before I saw the heart I'm so lonely broken angel

I'm so lonely missing to my heart

One and only broken angel

I'm and save me before I fall apart

I'm so lonely broken angel

I'm so lonely listen to my heart

One an only broken angel

I'm saying me before I'm gonna die Time and say we can go It's all my time

La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La La Yeah

Started in the kitchen

Watching good times

And what's happening

And all that good shit

Eating a note mill Shout out you Zion Zimil

that's right

they ask you why I get my soul from

let's go

yeah

Jackson fired shit.

This is it.

Yo.

Uh-huh.

What?

Yeah.

Hey, yo, niggas wanna clap me.

Monkey see monkey do.

I'm coming with black gloves and snubbers all chunky too.

African gold demos I iced out medals

I see niggas get murk

By the heels

It's the letters

I plan one nigga

Wien's the other die

By the echo

I had got some

Dorskin niggas

That look like freckles

Pay homage

My Islamic

My wrist Thomas

I threw a rams

In my camel suit I see them I vomit

It's a world permit me I live when I'm dragging the sattie is down a hair here

Holding bricks where my man got 85 the life a nice year year same day he spent at the judge and through a cheer, cheer.

Over large cake, you know it's on, checkmate, you can get spun just like a mix tape,

plus we take down your swardry mobbing with goblinsins It's the kid with the no face

That can take farm just like a snowflake

No reusable hammers they all throw ways

Yeah, we can get blambers

And hammers do damage

Me and ghosts in a ski mask

I was chilling and laying

Chalayan like sea vats and nobody was asking the

Pussy don't even fix your lips like they be your plastery

well fed got all the bread

I'm sad I need some head

I might tell you the one

while I'm hitting it

till I post not come to my senses

I tried to meditate

I tried to medicate

She had two phones

thought she was Kevin Gates

She was lying about it

Then she came clean

I was so mad

I fucked her so hard

She came clean

Got that new

whee

It's her me baby

She got that new bed

It's a say nay nay

I take it too far

I take it way way I take it way way way

I pull a coug

out of K&H

Over large cake

You know it's on

Checkmate

You can get sponge

Just like a mixtape

Plus

We take down your sergeant.

We mopping with gobliners.

It's the kid with the no face.

That can take form just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers.

They all throw ways.

Yeah, we can get blamins and hamans do damage

I'm like a Lowell Street activist flooded with shines

Jackson 5 or 4 towns I get better with time

Run up in the big gambling spots cocking it back

I'm talking Agnes Agatha, Germain and Jack

DVS is on custom watches

That's made from scraps

My burglestone is like an Easter egg

An emerald fact

My floor's gained

Floor seats in the glass

It came as a glass of

July sun beat the Oz in Vegas

Shook the Coke for the big lumps

And the Pyrecks traitors

We're gonna have been housing Who had work with the skies as painers.

Hot like bitches with fake asses that leak like drainage.

Our language, too much money we can't explain it.

Over large cake.

You know it's on checkmate.

You can get sponge just like a mix tape.

Plus, we'll take down your swarden, we're goblin as the kid with the no face.

That can take foam just like a snowflake.

No reusable hammers they are

throw ways yeah

we can give blamens and hamins

do damage and yeah

I like to thank all the

emcees across New York

Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem

Queens Tongallon Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem, Queens, Pong Allen, giving birth to pretty tone out here on Staten Island.

We be rally, nigger.

That's right.

Writing these rhymes in red ink, niggiggas with the red light on

cornered back in the days you hurt

40 ounce kingpins niggins

migger those are the days of shit

getting that money

We're saying for life

Yassini

Highlight me

Call me or something

Nicker

One

We show dirty in this head

You need to murder this shit

RIP

I'm up here

Fuck down here

I'm gonna. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm so. I'm so

a little

angel

I'm so lonely broken angel

I'm so lonely missing to my heart

One and only broken aim I'm all out of home

One more bad brain

Could bring a fall

When I'm far from home

Don't call me on the phone

Tell me I'm alone

It's easy to do you see

It's easy to

It's easy to But hard to get

believed

Eyes without a face eyes without a face

eyes without a face

eyes without a face

you got no human grace

your eyes without a face I spent

I spent so much time

but leaving all the life

To keep the dream alive

Now it makes me sad

It makes me mad the truth

For loving what was you.

Eyes without a face.

Eyes without a face

eyes without a face

God know you've been great

your eyes without a face

your eyes without a face out of page you When you hear the music you make a dip into someone else parking and make the slip

You're still a car and go to Las Vegas

Oh gigaloku

Hanging out by the state line

I now hush little baby don't you cry everything's gonna be all right stiffing that i'll pull it up little lady i told you daddy's here to hold you through the night i know mommy's not here right now

and we don't know why we fear how we filled inside it may seem a little crazy pretty baby but i promise

mamas don't be all right now hush little baby don't you cry everything's gonna be all right

sniffing out of burning up little lady i told you that he's here to hold you for the night I know mommy's got here right now

And we don't know why

We fear how we feel inside

I mean they seem a little crazy

Pretty baby

But I promise Mama's gonna be alright I'm gonna be alright I guess a little crazy pretty baby, but I promise, promise, it'll be all right.

Now hush, little baby, don't you cry?

Everything's gonna be alright

Stiffin'all up her lip up, little lady, I told you,

Daddy's here to hold you through the night

I know mommy's not here right now and we don't know why

We fear how we felt inside If we see my love Mommy's not here right now, and we don't know why.

We fear how we felt inside.

You seem a little crazy, pretty baby, but I promise,

Mama's don't you cry, everything's gonna be alright, she's gonna be alright Such a love put your coffee

A lady I told her that he's gonna hold her

That he's gonna hold her for the night and uh...

uh...

uh... Oh The The I'm Come catch me, babe.

I'm falling.

Come and see. Come who slides me, baby I'm calling

I'm calling calling Come and be with me, babe

Come my house you are

Come to catch your way Don't let me fade away

Don't let me fade away Don't let me fade away So, you know, so, you know,

so

I'm Come to catch a feeling, it's a electrician, It's electrifying me

And eyes quite open

I'm dreaming

Free falling, baby,

oh, wake up and fall on down.

Free falling, baby,

away before I'm down.

A wake up before I'm down Awake before one down Awake before I'm down

Awake before on down

Oh, wake before one down. Come and touch me, baby.

I'm a little afraid of. I need to feel love

And come for me, baby, love. I need to feel love

I need to feel love

And come to catch a far

Don't let me fade away

And come catch your fire

Don't let me fade away

Come to catch a feeling

It's electrician me

I'm quite open

I'm dreaming

Free falling, baby

away before I'm down.

Free falling, baby, oh, when you fall, I'm down.

Come and touch me, baby, I'm down. Come touch me, baby.

I need to feel you.

Come you hold me, babe.

I need to feel you.

Yeah. I need to feel like. So, you know, Come and touch me, baby, I need to free love.

And come go home with me, babe

I need to feel love

I need to feel love

I need to feel love

I need to feel love I need to feel love

I need to feel love The and

.

... Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. I'm here for the money here for the pain though I'm here the fame. Though it might be nice to own a jet plane,

I'm gonna do it off for you.

Come along this year's true,

but the world is pretty cold.

You might need a sweater too.

I'mma put a ride on you.

Get from California.

Trying to make it in life.

It's golden era taught you.

Dreams on my own.'ve been working from home

I can do it on my own

But sometimes it gets cold

Like

Because it's cold

Because it's cold outside

And I don't know why I'm just living my life

I'm just living my life

nothing's gonna see

I've got packing from the tree

so we're going to be

so I'm just living my life

I'm just living my life

there's nothing there's nothing to want more

Nothing else I want to see

They grab a mic and hit the stage

And kill it on the scene

Perseverein for my team

So they can acquire cream

Find out what the words

Pace off really need

Breathing life to a dream

My peers wouldn't believe When I'm running out of breath

Africa had to breathe has been colder than never nothing like I remember like spring is the weather and every day is like December so bring out your coats bring out your sweaters there's no tell them when this weather is gonna get better because I remember the moments when I was thought as a joke.

Now they're giving me handshake saying it was a joke, but I ain't joking around. I'm trying to give you a hope.

But you can do it if you want it, man, you drive your own road. road yeah a book full of raps by the end

of every class

that's my formula

for life

not the formula to laugh

like

I'm gonna

be

because it's called

outside

and I don't know why

I'm a slip in my life I'm gonna slap know why I'm just living my life

I'm inside my life

I'm gonna see now

I can't see now I can pull the dreams

So the world's out freeze

When joy you're doing to a freeze

I'm just looking at my life

I'm just like hear me. I'm just the world.

It's incredible. The I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm Ching-chang-road Eiching to light

No,

No, not for his I think the long-road-tran, eyes'-and-lis-lust-hang,

not-pahed

un-pac-and-pion-n-n-fonged un-pion-dhound

new-she-hound,

ming-shund

the face-and

still,

the t'-tie-l-l-l-tie-tong.

I, k-k-k-k- I can live teatang

I can't, count,

count,

count,

don't

let me let me let me

go out

you're

just

and you're

just can you're and you're and and you're and and you're and and you you know, is for chow-shund be her know, just

can you is for will

and I'm

I'm can

come count

go

and go

and go

and don't get

and I

you

you and

I you I give'm I'll give you

Forcian, I'll give you

Forcian,

You're the world,

I'll give you

Ten Chau. You know, Are you? Are you, are you coming to the tree?

I told you to run

so we both be free

strange things

it happened here no stranger

wouldn't be

if we met and me

night in the hanging tree

are you are you coming to the tree

They strong up our man

They say the murder free

Strange things that happen

You're going to see We met and did strange things that happened here since the wooded in

we met and been

right in the hanging tree

are you, are you

coming to the tree

dead and call

now for his love to bring

Strange things that have been

The stranger will be

Amen

and I have you

I have you

I have been

and Tray and

I'm and the people are

you know Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh. Oh. The You know, The I'm a wonderful

I'm going to I want to know and so you know I'm gonna have a bit of a bit more

and a lot of it. I'm not

I'm

and

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm and the other and

I'm going to

I'm going to and you know

and

I'm and

I'm and the other one of the other than we're going to be able to be able to be able to be and the I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm gonna be. I'm gonna

and

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm You know, Welcome! Welcome.

Wow, Johnny 2x4.

Thank you so much for the subscription.

What's up, everybody?

I was supposed to go live yesterday.

It's too busy working on that video I just showed you. Not the intro, the one before that. All me, by the way. I had to get all the footage. I had to get everything myself. Blackpack! Let's fucking go! What a great way to start the stream.

Let's go, Blackpack!

Yeah, I got all that stuff myself. It was such a pain in the ass.

I was inspired by some viral

TikToks and Twitter posts,

you know, contrasting the MetGala

to Gaza and other things and it was all me i was all me so i hope you

enjoyed that two minute video i'm not usually a video editor myself. I just used Capcut.

Desktop Capcut. It's actually so surprisingly easy to use, but I'm not going to get into that because no one gives a hoot. Sorry, I'm not going to be swearing.

We have some things to talk about today.

And there's some issues, not going to name names, from the community that I'd like to resolve.

There's some behavior I'd like to discourage.

But we're not going to get into that right away. We're going to instead

talk about something a little bit more prescient. And then guess what? We're going full Reddit today

because I'm going to be talking about the Star Wars prequels as well today. So it's actually going to be a really fun day. It's actually going to be a really fun day and I have a lot in store, but something really

interesting transpired

over the course of the past

day. Let me actually

see

exactly what we are

talking about here.

Ed Gentry with the fuck.

This desktop doesn't work.

Ed Gentry with the five.

What's up?

Sorry, fucking desktop is acting like a piece of shit.

Um, let me find this tweet.

Interesting stuff going on.

There we go.

Let's just share the RTSG

RTSG description of what happened because we want to go to our own people as

trusted in reliable sources you know where it's not like we're gonna trust, you know,

it's not like we're just gonna trust random,

random people we don't even know.

Anyway, let me give you some background.

It's really interesting, because last stream I was covering the Twitter battle between Jackson and Nick Fuentes.

Now Nick Fuentes' friends have joined his allies like Suleiman, a few other people, like that Lucas Gage guy.

They've all jumped on the, and this other guy, I forget his name.

He calls himself an anti-Marxist, though.

But he's scared to debate Marxist, so that's a really interesting contrast.

Anyway, they all jumped on this bandwagon of accusing Jackson of being a Fed.

Why?

Because Jackson said that as Americans, you know, we should have solidarity with Hamas if we're

American patriots.

And that Hamas is good. And there's no reason to condemn Hamas.

At the very minimum, let's say, because I feel like this element was missing from the discourse,

you know, Nick Fuentes was constantly, oh, no, support for Hamas is not allowed because, you know, they're terrorists.

And it's like, even if you believe that it's dangerous to express sympathy for Hamas, which I used to think, by the way, but that was mainly because I was afraid of being de-platformed from Twitch. Not so much because I believed it was against the law, which it isn't. And we're going to get into that too, by the way. And a lot of this is going to be the legal side and the optic side of things. So keep that in mind. But even if you were to ignore that, you don't have to call Hamas terrorists. You don't have to smear them. You don't have to attack them. Even if you're reluctant to express explicit support for them in the sense

of sympathy and, you know, ideological solidarity, let's call it, you don't actually have to start

repeating Zionist propaganda and call

them terrorists, which is what

Nick Fuentes did. Nobody

forced him to do that at gunpoint. He did

that himself. He started gibbering about

how it's because he's a Christian,

and that he takes issue with suicide

bombings, even though actually Orthodox Christians, was she an Orthodox Christian, I don't know. Members of the SSNP, who were Christian, were the ones who pioneered the practice of suicide bombing

not Muslims

so it's just kind of a total

ignorance

um

but in any case

he went out of his way to call them terrorists

this isn't see Lucas Gage made a tweet, and he just goes, you know,

Oh, Jackson's definitely a Fed because you can't...

It's not that I'm condemning Hamas.

I can't support it.

It's like, well, Fuentes was calling them terrorists.

That's what it's had issue here.

He was calling Hamas terrorists. No one what it's at issue here. He was calling

Hamas terrorists. No one's forcing

him to do that. We'll get into

the optic stuff in a second. Okay?

Now, strangely enough,

this is so strange.

So coincidental. Some of the guys at RTSG hypothesized the two might be connected. BDS decided to release a statement, falsely claiming that the popular front from the liberation of Palestine and other resistance groups signed off on it, by the way, that basically said this in the statement.

More or less the same thing that Nick Fuentes said.

It's not helpful to express solidarity with armed resistance.

You should only support... Amila! let's go. They're like,

it's not, it's not helpful to express support or solidarity for any violent groups or any armed resistance or the actions of Hamas, whatever. And they're like, that's actually hurting our cause.

And you know who shares the same opinion is Norman Finkelstein himself? Norman Finkelstein also

thinks that the way to go for Palestine in America is just this is just this kind of gondy stuff because for some reason

norman finkelstein and the bd s movement believe that south africa was liberated by gondy and not by

armed militants of the mk they believe that Gandhi is the universal paradigm of a successful militant, you know, just purely nonviolent forms of national liberty.

Notice I'm being very, very careful with my words. National liberation.

Okay. So we're talking about, you know, a system like the apartheid system. It's explicitly an apartheid system. We're talking about occupation by a foreign government. I know we're saying America's under occupation, but I don't call for violence in the U.S. I'm very careful not to do that, and I don't do that. I don't call for violence in any capacity in the United States.

But BDS is under the delusion that the Palestinian struggle is like the Gandhi struggle, but it's not a Gandhi struggle, okay?

It's even a little more warlike, it's even more warlike than the anti-apartheid struggle, although there's similarities, of course.

But Palestinian statehood was very clearly defined, a very clearly defined aim under international law, whereas the militants of the anti-apartheid struggle were fighting for a new kind of state a pro-African

a just state for and by the peoples of azania the african people in the region which was an aspiration for a future thing, right?

Of course, the apartheid was a kind that was an occupation, and that's why it was a national liberation struggle.

But I'm just using these examples to emphasize how diluted the view of the liberals who gatekeep and monopolize

BDS are. This is including Norman Finkelstein. I don't know what his relationship toward the

leadership is. Anyway, they thought they were very clever speaking on behalf of the resistance.

And many, of course, many Pan Leftists jumped on board, basically saying, yeah, you know, anyone who's supporting Hamas is a Fed, and they're trying to wreck everything.

And it's not good optics. these are coming and this is another

this is something else BDS was saying just like Nick Fuentes and co they were like these are

infiltrators these are bad faith actors and infiltrators trying to make us look bad by associating our position with one of solidarity with the armed

resistance when we don't do that at all. We just believe in Gandhi stuff, right? So here's something

that's pretty funny that happened. Something pretty funny, if you ask me at least. The actual PPFLP, the popular

front for the liberation of Palestine, issued a statement denouncing the National Committee of BDS on

their position of armed resistance. They say it contradicts

the legitimacy of our people in practicing resistance and ignores the state of consensus around it.

We followed the position issued in the statement that was issued in English regarding the position required to be adopted, regarding armed resistance by movements of solidarity with our people.

We reject the call contained in that statement, and we value all positions, forces, and personalities that expressed their support for the

Palestinian resistance in the face of a war of genocide

and Zionist colonialism.

So

they basically denounced them and

basically trashed their position

and said it wasn't

representative

at all.

The

boycott

committee was

trying to

speak on

behalf of

all of

the

boycott

committee spread

throughout

the world

you know

and that

that the

national

boycott

committee located in Ramallah isn't the one in charge.

Okay.

So they're basically trying to say that the Palestinian Authority, who I think was related to this statement, maybe, maybe not.

I'm not exactly sure. But I heard that at least from someone

else. They're basically saying like, listen, that's not a monot. They don't have a monopoly on the

Palestinian struggle. On the contrary, the forces that have actually made progress when it comes

to the Palestinian struggle are the ones waging armed struggle, okay, located primarily in Gaza, but also in the West Bank as well.

So the Palestinian Authority doesn't speak on behalf of the entirety of the Palestinian struggle. So that was incredibly interesting because here we had a convergence between the, I don't want to call them liberal Zionists, but it's awfully sounding like liberal Zionism nowadays when you hear the BDS or Norman Finkelstein condemn armed resistance and it's just kind of nonsense. You know, this is a war. We're talking about a war. We're not talking about a civil rights movement. We're talking about a fucking war, okay? Between two different countries, actually. Actually, not even between two countries, because Israel isn't a country. So it's even more aggressively a war.

It's between a country and a foreign, aggressive, occupying force

that is using armed force to exterminate and commit crimes against everyone.

I find it incredibly ridiculous.

I find it incredibly ridiculous

that there's some people in the West

who are like, no, no, no, okay, we can secretly support armed resistance, but like,

it's either bad optics or it's going to get you in trouble with the effects. So I'm going to lay

this issue to rest, and in one fell swoop, I'm going to address McFentes and Co, Soleiman, and the BDS.

And I'm going to just in one fell swoop address the issue of the legal side of things, the government side of things, and the Fed side of things.

Okay.

Point number one.

Is expressing sympathy or solidarity with Hamas or with the armed Palestinian resistance going to put you on the radar of the feds? And the answer is probably.

But wait, this is the important thing you are already on the radar of the feds for much much less that's the point i'd like to get across even if you're one of these BDS people who doesn't express support for armed resistance,

you're still on the radar of the feds.

You are on the radar of the feds if you are a dissident of any kind.

Doesn't matter what kind of dissident you are.

If you are any kind of dissident who holds views that dissent from the majority opinion,

and this isn't just on politics, it's even on cultural issues.

As we saw with Samira being on one of these lists because of her views on the manosphere or whatever.

So if you have any dissenting views on any topic whatsoever, you are in all likelihood on the radar of the feds.

And You are in all likelihood on the radar of the feds. And that's just the simple truth of it.

You're not more or less on the radar of the feds based on your opinion on Hamas, actually.

You're on their radar, and they will, if they have the opportunity,

try to get you for something, for breaking some kind of law if they can.

It doesn't matter how extreme your ideological position is. As long as you're any kind of dissident, they're after you. And if you ask me, sometimes they even go after the unproblematic people even harder. Just because it's they see it as a challenge or something

but it's just a tendency I've observed and I've been able to observe before but what how should we

actually understand the meaning of support okay if an organization is on the u.s. designated

terror list you cannot materially support them obviously you cannot materially support them you

can't send them aid you can't um engage in any

kind of services for them you can't do things for them on their behalf you can't act as an agent

on their behalf.

And that much is crystal clear.

You can't do any of that.

Okay?

That is actually illegal.

And this is the important thing.

You should follow the law because Jackson is not nor myself nor anyone else I know or I can see who's expressing solidarity because there's a difference with the armed resistance none of those people are advocating for you to violate the actual law that's on the books.

So Lucas Gage, I saw him say that actually it's illegal.

No, it's not illegal to express a spiritual solidarity with Hamas. That's not

illegal at all.

What's illegal

is providing material support

of any kind. And before you

make the... Oh, it's going to put you on the radar

of the feds. You're already on the

radar of the feds. Don't on the radar of the feds don't worry about that the important thing

that you should do is follow the law don't break any laws and don't give them any excuses to get you in

trouble and be aware of what the law actually is.

So there you go.

Okay.

So I want to settle that issue once and for all on the legal side of things.

And on the side of like, oh, I'm going to be put on a Fed watch list.

Like, Jackson's trying to get everyone on a watch list.

You are on a

watch list anyway,

especially if

you're Lucas Gage.

If you know

about Lucas Gage's

background in his

past, he's

already on a

watch list.

Nick Flentes is

already on a

watch list. So isentes is already on a watch list.

So is everybody in America first.

Everyone is on a watch list.

Literally all of these people are on watch list.

Doesn't matter what your views on

Hamas are. You're on a watch list.

If you're even semi, even if you're not even sincerely critical of the regime, but you're perceived that way, you're on a watch list.

Okay.

You know, it's not hard to get on a watch list at all.

Caleb Maupin is on a watch list.

Okay.

Well, you could say because it's foreign. Okay. Jason Unruin is on a watch list. Okay. Well, you could say because it's foreigns. Okay. Jason Unruh is on a watch list. Okay. It's not hard to get on a watch list. You're, you're where everyone's there. You're all on watchless. We're all on watchless. Okay. We are all on watch lists.

We are all on watchless.

So there's no getting, there's, there's no preventing that, actually. If you're involved in any kind of alternative form of politics, doesn't matter what the content is.

You're on a watch list.

You're on an FBI watch list.

So let's just clear that and get that out of the way because I've been really waiting like two days, three days to get this off my chest.

Because I was so sick of stupid people claiming,

oh, Jackson's a honeypot.

He's a honeypot.

He's not going to pay your legal fees if you get in trouble.

If you can get in trouble for verbally expressing spiritual and ideological solidarity with armed resistance and that you can actually be thrown in jail for that i'm sorry but laws then just changed i mean i know they can get you from really, really small shit.

Like the Uruhu guys had like a Zoom call with some guy in Russia one time, participated in a conference.

And they, like, got them for that, apparently, right?

For sharing, like, some facebook meme but uh like this

an ideological position is not illegal it's not criminalized okay um so yeah i'm going to be clear about that that being said you cannot express support for

hamas on social media now this is the part where i want the guerrillas to fucking listen to me very carefully. You cannot express support for armed resistance on Discord. It's against Discord's policy. You can't fucking do it. So just because I'm saying you can do it legally doesn't mean you can do it on Discord.

For now, on X, it's allowed.

So you see the difference.

It's allowed on X because it's not illegal.

But don't let that, don't go on Instagram and discord and all these other platforms and youtube and start

being a fucking retard because those platforms actually prohibit it okay um it's not someone is it too

late to buy tickets to the live event absolutely not it's not someone is it too late to buy a tickets to the live event absolutely not it's not too late

go and grab a ticket go and grab a ticket you have one week between now and then one week

you can grab a ticket a matter of, I think we opened up some more...

I don't want to say this because I think people who will buy a second one, I don't want people buying more than one ticket.

But let me be very clear about about this we opened up more slots for their premium tickets

because there was an accounting mistake that i made where we set it to a certain number and i

thought it was going to be more i thought the number was higher that I set it to for how much are available.

So actually the total amount of available premium tickets were smaller than what I had intended.

So recently we opened it up a little bit, but if you've already bought a ticket and you missed out on premium,

and you're like, oh, now it was my chance to get a premium ticket, don't fucking do it,

or we're going to turn you away at the door. And yes, we will check, okay?

If you're a gorilla and you weren't able to get a premium ticket, don't worry.

I'm telling you, you have my word, don't worry, you're not going to miss out on anything.

Don't worry, okay?

So just stay with the regular ticket that you have and don't worry about anything.

Okay, if you're, I'll look out for my gorillas and don't worry about anything okay if you're i'll look out for

my gorillas don't worry about it uh this is for general audiences that we're opening these new premium

tickets for um but if you haven't bought a ticket yet and you you you get a premium one, well, there's some available now.

Okay.

There you go. Anyway, let me continue.

Let me continue.

So that should clear up anything pertaining to the legal side of things the watchless side of things whatever now we're going to kind of it's like a pyramid we start from the

most serious concern to the less serious concerns to the fundamental reason why it's important to articulate the Palestinian struggle as an armed struggle, the meaning of armed resistance, and the implications that has for the general atmosphere of global

militancy so we're going to start from the top down basically let me continue okay um

i just want to go ahead and say,

I do not care to entertain

arguments about optics

from people who openly express the glorification and veneration of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, the German Nazis.

Shut the, literally shut the fuck up about optics if you glorify Hitler and the Nazis.

Just shut your fucking mouth because nobody cares about what you have to say.

You're disqualified from the conversation.

So get out of it.

So any far right person trying, oh, it's bad optics to support Hamas because most Americans don't, but you support Hitler.

So shut the fuck up. You're out of the conversation. Okay.

So I'm going to go ahead and just like shelve that.

It's not even worth addressing.

If you glorify Hitler and deny the Holocaust, but it's too far for you to express solidarity with Hamas, you are a fucking idiot.

And there's nothing you say that needs to be taken seriously on this question

Don't lecture us about optics when you praise Hitler okay because I promise you there is nothing worse than that optically, if that's what you're concerned about.

Now, coming from the more left and even left liberal side of things, that's the argument I actually am going to address. I'm not going to address

the argument coming from the far right because it's not even worth being entertained. But let's say

you're one of these BDS people, you know, you're kind of a leftist, I guess, and you're like,

well, you know what, it's bad optics to express solidarity with the armed

resistance. And actually, it hurts the cause of Palestine. It hurts the cause of Palestine because this is a... Actually, I want to address an argument by Soleiman about Russia.

So before I get into the leftist thing, I'm going to go ahead and do that.

Soleiman said that he thinks it's hypocritical that Jackson, myself, and others are faulting Nick Fuentes for condemning Hamas as terrorists, yet we say nothing about Russia's condemnation of October 7th when it happened, even comparing it to terrorism and saying it was a terrorist attack at the time. Well, Soleiman, I don't have any personal beef with you. So I can, I guess I can keep this in good spirits and just respond in good faith and explain to you very carefully why that's not a very articulate argument.

Let's start with number one.

There are Zionists in the Russian government and there is a legacy within the Russian government.

There is a precedent since the dissolution of the Soviet Union of Russia, not really taking radical positions at all when it comes to revolutionary changes in the world, including on the

Palestinian issue. While Russia remains committed to the two-state solution, it is not Russia's

formal position to fully break ties with the Zionist entity and refuse to recognize it at all at all. Whether you

agree or disagree with that position, it's a geopolitical position that Russia is in right now. So that's just

based on precedent. It's not a subjective position based on someone's opinion. It's a

geopolitical position that they're in right now. And let's actually, and then further, let's bracket that

down and actually analyze that position and put it into context. So since the 1990s, Russia has not really taken a hostile

stance toward Israel, but that's actually started to change. Now, if you look past the formal statement they gave on October 7th and pay attention

to what Russia is actually doing, especially behind the scenes and how it's moving and how it's

maneuvering, it is going in the direction of an alliance or

some kind of solidarity with the axis of resistance in the region it's recognizing hamas for the

first time it did recently it's hosting hosting them in Moscow. There were reports that Hamas

informed the Russians of the attack before it happened. Russia is coordinating with Iran and the

axis of resistance surrounding the issue of Syria.

So make no mistake, that's just a public formality that Russia was issuing.

Materially speaking, in actual practice, Russia is more and more getting closer with the axis of resistance.

So he's really taking things out of context.

Yes, it's true.

In the past, Russia had no sympathy at all with Hamas, no relationship with them.

And they were much more friendly with Israel. But that's a vestige of the past that is bleeding over into the formalism that their foreign ministry is now, that gave expression to on October 7. That doesn't actually reflect like Russia's actual relationship to the conflict now,

or even at the time, to be honest. So it was a formality. Let me be clear about that. It was a

formality taken out of context. That's what Soleimand is missing. It was a formality taken out of context. That's what Soleiman is missing. It was a formality taken out of

context. But even if we ignore that, this is point number two, even if we ignore that entirely,

let's pretend it's not a form. Let's just ignore that, right?

Russia is a different country than America.

It doesn't matter what Russia's position is in this context, because the Zionist entity would not exist without America, something that Nick Flentes himself admitted before.

The Zionist entity would not exist without America.

So actually, our position on the question as Americans, there's more stakes involved in it.

Okay?

Much more is that stake.

There would be no Israel without America.

So that's a really important point to make now third of all since this is in america

and since this is within the context of American politics,

strategically speaking, even formally speaking, what is the value of condemning Hamas as terrorists

within an anti-Zionist context in the U.S.

If your goal is to fight Zionist influence in the U.S.,

which Nick Fuentes claims is his goal, but clearly it isn't,

clearly he just hates Jews.

He doesn't have an issue with Zionism.

But if your goal is to fight Zionist propaganda and influence in the U.S., why would you

reinforce the legitimacy of the designation of Hamas as terrorists?

There's no strategic value in that whatsoever.

There's no point in doing it other than being a Zionist shill.

I mean, there are elements in the Russian government where there's businessmen involved in the Russian state that have ties to Israel.

So there's like a formalism at play here.

Do I agree with it? Absolutely not.

There's a bunch of pro-Western elements,

pro-Israel elements that I fundamentally oppose in Russia.

Russia is not the Soviet Union.

We know that.

But we can see what direction is it going in? Is it a positive direction with the SMO or is it a more pro-Western direction? Well, it's clearly the reverse. And the proof of that is that Russia is starting to get closer to the axis of resistance at Hamas itself since the onset of the conflict.

And its relationships with Israel are starting to severely deteriorate at the expense of the interests of these businessmen.

But nonetheless, their influence on the government is very clear, it's very observable.

And you can attribute that influence to why they have the foreign,

why they make these kinds of statements on October 7th as a formalism.

It's just a formality and nothing else that reflects that institutional foothold those pro-Western elements still have.

But what's Nick Fuentes' excuse? What business ties does he have that are, you know,

necessary evil for some wider, even forget necessary evil.

Like, what excuse does Nick Fuentes waging a struggle against like oligarchs within his government, where he has to balance the fine line, but ultimately for the purposes of undermining their power and, you know, restoring the Soviet Union.

There's no comparable context in the case of Fuentes, none. There's no reason, and there's no excuse, an American political influencer should be calling Hamas terrorists unless you're a Zionist

show point blank period.

Russia's statements have nothing to do with that.

You're like, why don't you hold Russia to the same standard because russia is not a political actor in america

russia is not a political personality russia is a state whose positions are based on a formal

position okay it's actually a different state in a different country whose positions are based on a formal position.

Okay.

It's actually a different state in a different country.

There's a diplomatic and strategic value to the statements that it makes that cannot be held up to the same standard as American individual political influencers.

So that's my way to address Suleiman's argument.

Now I'm going to the left liberal argument, and by left liberal, I'm going to the left liberal argument, which is, and by left liberal, I mean like Finkelstein.

Let's just say this is the Finkelstein position.

It hurts the credibility of the anti-Zionist, or they don't even call it that maybe, the the the pro-Palestine movement in the u.s to be openly expressing solidarity and justification for armed resistance that's another

important thing. Justification and solidarity.

And that actually it would be more credible if we gained favor among the respectable kind of liberal

class, because, you know, that's the Nelson Mandela, and that's the people who made Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela win, right?

Wrong. That's not even true, first of all.

Second of all, there is no, there is no way you're going to lie to americans and portray the palest the actual

palestinian resistance as a gandhi movement maybe that's what the Palestinian Authority wants.

But Americans know that Palestinians are people fighting with guns, whatever they're

fighting for, whether it's justified or not.

Like, everyone knows that it's people with guns who are waging

this struggle and they're using guns to do it and it's an armed

resistance. There's no way around that.

You can't just wish it to be something else. It a war this is not a gondi peace movement it's a

war that the palestinians are waging they're waging a war just like in and for some reason i

think finkelstein would agree that this is a justifiable war.

Just like the war against the Nazis was a war that wasn't, Winston Churchill was not Gandhi, pleading with Hitler to stop and starving himself.

On the contrary, he was a very obese guy, Churchill.

FDR wasn't Gandhi against the Japanese. Stalin certainly wasn't Gandhi against Hitler either.

So that was a war. So just like that was a war, the armed resistance in Palestine is waging a war.

That's the nature of the conflict. It's a war. It's not a human rights conflict. It's not a simple human rights struggle. It not a civil rights struggle let me repeat that a

million times the Palestinian struggle is not a civil rights struggle it's a war it's a war war

war war okay there is no way around that and portraying yourself as a respectable

gondy type oh just peaceful boycott whatever that is not going to make the forces of Zionist propaganda any more lenient on you anyway.

You gain nothing from it.

So stop using optics as an excuse because the optics will be the same regardless.

They will portray you as a terrorist Hamas supporter regardless, even if you're slightly critical of Israel.

That's what they're going to portray you as.

So if you take issue with justifying armed resistance, then it's very clear that you take issue with it, not because of the optics of that position, but because in content, you reject armed resistance.

So just BDS National Committee come out and say that. Come out and say that you just

disagree with the use of armed resistance and just say that. Stop using optics as an excuse because

the optics don't make a difference.

The optics do not make a difference. This is not a civil rights struggle. It's an armed

struggle. It's a war. It's a war. It's not a civil rights struggle. struggle it's a war a civil right struggle is something that

happens within a country so martin luther king for example is not saying far from it actually

he's not saying the united states of america is an illegitimate entity that needs to be completely wiped off the map.

He's not saying that. He's just saying that within the United States of America, we want civil rights.

So that's a civil rights struggle. A civil rights struggle is something that is internal to a state

it's literally in the name civil civil rights who is granting you those rights the state

the Palestinians are not asking the Zionist entity for civil rights.

They are speaking to the Zionist entity in the language of bullets and missiles, because it's a war.

So let's be clear about it. It's a war. It's not a civil rights struggle. It's a war. Let's be clear about that. So this optics jibber-jabber is completely beyond the point. Now, now, let's, but let's rein it in a little bit. Because I also don't

agree with edginess for its own sake, but let's properly place into the context the significance of

armed struggle and armed resistance.

And what that should mean for us as Americans, if we justify it.

I think actually the best thing you can do in order to defend the Palestinians in this country is compare them to our own founding fathers.

Everyone agrees that Washington was within his right to take up a musket against the British.

That is a very clear example of a justifiable form of armed struggle and armed resistance,

which is built into the texture and the fabric of the founding of this country.

Have we forgotten who we are as Americans?

Yes, the Patriots picked up a musket for this country to be built and founded.

It was founded on blood.

It wasn't founded on Gandhi.

George Washington was not Gandhi.

He wasn't just boycotting the British.

He took up a musket and shot them to get rid of them.

The British were foreign occupiers, and it's engraved, it's foundational, the justification of this very country, this very soil that we stand upon. It's foundational that armed struggle is defensible when waged by patriots expelling foreign occupiers from their land.

That position is as American as Apple Pie.

There's not a single American who would disagree with that.

There's not a single American if I ask them, hey,

if some foreign occupying force

came into Idaho, are you going to spill blood

to defend your land?

That's the meaning of, that's why they were called

the Patriots, by the way.

That is the whole meaning and content of patriotism is the just nature of wars of national liberation from foreign occupation so let's be

absolutely clear.

Of course there's a way to present the Palestinian resistance in a light which is optically

favorable to us within the context of America. It's called just being historically honest and recognizing that that is the

very thing that founded this country. Now, for some reason, leftists who one minute are so concerned

with optics that they're willing to condemn arm resistance, but in the next minute,

throw the optics of this overboard and especially look

the other way when Hassan Piker uses this

same talking point.

And they say, no, Haas,

the

American War of Independence was actually illegitimate and more comparable to Zionism, because they were settler colonialists.

And that is just such a stupid, ridiculous to have it's such a stupid ridiculous position

for a number of reasons but i'll just simplify it with this although there were many evils

and injustices committed by the Yankees that were here against whatever you call them, the patriots, the Americans, I mean, we're all Americans, Indians are also Americans. Let's say the European Americans, although

there is a lot of injustices committed by them against indigenous people, including dispossession

of land, it is incomparable to Zionism for the following reason and the following reason alone.

It's very simple.

One was economic based in the barbaric nature of the relations of production and can be attributed to the general evil of capitalism itself but the

other is an ideological response and form of the decay of capitalism itself Zionism is not

simply an economic phenomena

of people behaving in a certain way

toward the indigenous people

because of the relations of

production, because of the logic of

the relations of production in general.

It is an intentional and methodical, ideological project, which in many ways itself was superficially

anti-capitalist, meaning the aspect of labor Zionism and the fact that it was presenting itself in a socialistic garb makes it even more unjustifiable and more worse. Why? Because it reveals that Zionism was implemented and its

villainy and its infamous deeds

were carried out in an era

where a basic

recognition of the

right to national self-determination was

there, a recognition of the

need for social factors, social questions,

to be addressed and to be recognized. Instead of just the blind barbarism and piracy and

villainy of early capitalism, This was an era where basic social

questions and considerations like, you know, is this compatible with the social existence

of this people? I mean, that was all there. There was already a precedent of international law.

The way in which Israel had to deceive and lie to the entire international community,

which had already accepted some kind of precedent of a universal right of national

self-determination, proves

why there's a qualitative difference.

In the era of Washington, there's

no such thing as international law.

There's no such thing as

this kind of

universally recognized right of national self-determination.

There's no way of recognizing sovereign forms of national communities.

As a matter of fact, the American Revolution was the first instance of the sovereignty of a nation in the form of

popular sovereignty being asserted against the norm of colonialism. The fact that that was not taken

to its logical conclusion and also apply to recognize some kind of sovereignty of the indigenous people i agree it was a shortcoming but let's recognize the historically progressive nature of the fact that this is setting the precedent of a consciousness of popular sovereignty and national self-determination that's where they were called the patriots all patriotic anti-colonialist movements after that were influenced by that revolution.

And I'm not saying there weren't evils that occurred during it or, especially in the aftermath of it, far from it.

I'm not even saying those evils in terms of the suffering they inflicted were less than that of Zionism. But in order to measure the historical evil of a given phenomena as Marxists, we can't just measure it in terms of the suffering that it inflicted we have to measure it in

terms of whether it was trying to resist the laws of history in vain or not whether it was a

result of a general ignorance and barbarism of the time in general, whether it was, we have to place it within the context of how it related itself to the general tendencies and trends of history as such. And that's how you measure whether

it was equal or not.

And this is a very simple Marxist view that I

am very confused about

is in contention to begin with,

actually.

You know, there is a unique barbarism of Zionism because Zionism is formed in the context of the modern world or let's say the post-war world right Zionism is a specific way of responding to what Kojev would call the era of

universal states, of a universal recognition of freedom in general, the freedom of people's, and so on and so on.

Zionism is in reaction to that.

It's a specific response to that.

So to use Marxist lingo,

George Washington wasn't a reactionary.

But Zionism is reactionary.

That's why they're different.

You can't say that they're the same

just because in both cases

there was dispossession of land if that was your criterion of measuring the historical

goodness or evil or progressiveness or reactionary character of a given phenomena

you would get really confused about history you would get really confused about the. You would get really confused about the positions

taken up by Marx and Engels themselves with regard to history. Dispossession of land is

not uncommon in history. It's actually very common. But within what context is that occurring is how you should make sense of it? And by the way, a universal morality, we're not even necessarily talking about morality. Oh, was it good or was it bad? Of course, today, it's equally bad to steal and dispossess and exterminate a people.

Of course.

Nobody's saying it's not.

But that is not grounds for historical nihilism, where you take that standard today and apply it 500 years ago and then nail people on a cross 500 years ago who should have, quote, unquote, known better.

And the Marxist view is very clear.

Some say, oh, no, the British were more progressive because the British were actually going to prevent expansion and they were going to abolish slavery.

That's not true.

The biggest supporter of the Confederacy was the British Empire.

So that's a lie.

The British Empire relied on slavery, and the only reason it was able to, it was able to take the position on the slave trade that it did is because it could reliably count on slavery having a basis in the American South to support its industries, so it itself

didn't need slavery anymore. So that's why, okay? Let's be clear. Let's be clear about the facts.

Oh, the British were more historical progressive because they were more benevolent

toward the indigenous people

see that's another thing even if that was true

which it's not by the way by any means

but let's assume that it's true

that is not the

criterion by which you judge whether

a historical phenomena is progressive

or reactionary.

So,

end of story. Zionism, there's nothing

historically progressive about Zionism,

whereas the American Revolution was historically

progressive. I'll finally say on a final note, I guess, a more final note, the thing is, even if we recognize the various evils and greedy motivations that were there for the American Revolution and all these different elements, still, among the common people, among the yeomen, among the small farmer, among the common people among the yeomen among the small farmer among the common folk of this country in general the common folk the people that is an ingrained tradition for them that revolution and that was their revolution just as much as it was anyone else's. In fact, they were the main bulk carrying that revolution out. It stemmed from their sentiments. It's ingrained within their own historical memory and self-identity as a revolutionary tradition.

And that goes beyond the context of slavery and maltreatment of indigenous people.

Because here's why.

Because even if we accept the evils of slavery and the maltreatment of indigenous peoples, even if we accept all of that, which I do, of course, I accept that it was these were were evils, and I admit to that.

That doesn't negate

that doesn't negate

the historical significance

of the American Revolution

for the American people, both

historically and today.

It really was like Hamas.

You know, it's not like Hamas in the sense that they were the same material context.

But it's like Hamas in the sense that this was a kind of,

this was a national of this was a national

liberation struggle that drew

from the common people, the common folk

to overthrow foreign occupiers

what they perceived to be

foreign occupiers, people who lived on the land

for hundreds of years, going about

their ordinary business

they did relate

to the British, like Palestinians

relate to the Israeli occupier

there is a comparison there.

I mean, sure. I mean, in the

case of Israel, it's probably much worse and much more

brutal because of modern

technology and stuff, but in terms

of the sentiment and the fervor

driving the revolution, it's very

comparable. It's incredibly comparable.

You know,

people working on the land

tied to the land, fighting a foreign colonizer.

That's how it was experienced.

That's what people, you know, I don't know what these universities have done to the youth to completely misguide them about the facts.

Washington and the Patriots did not see themselves as colonizers or colonists.

A colonist is maybe there taking a risk, but ultimately they're going to go back home someday, or they're going to, they're maintaining some kind of relationship to a core, an imperial core.

This was a case of people who were descended from colonists deciding to acclimate to the land, deciding to commit to it, fundamentally, right? And that was not, so the question is,

was that completely artificial, as it is in the case of Zionism, like with the creation of these all these cabots and all these kind of artificial forms of association and settlement today that occurs in Palestine and continues to occur in Palestine? Or was there a kernel of authenticity in that?

Did they really, after over 100 years, over generations, as Stalin pointed out, form a different nation than the Imperial core, and was there an authenticity there?

And I think all you have to do is ask this question. It's basically a materialist question.

If Israel... if Israel is the result of an authentic was the result of an authentic national aspiration why can't Israel exist on its own?

Why does it, why has it always needed to rely on foreign support in order to continue existing?

Think about that.

America had nobody, I mean, America had nobody

I mean we

America had an alliance with France

I guess during the war

after that they were on their own

the war of 1812 happens

who's helping America

who's helping America?

Who's propping up America in 1812 in the same way Israel has to be

propped up in order to exist?

See, Israel is a

fake country. America isn't. It's that

simple. I'm not saying there weren't a lot of inexcusable evils that were committed. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying America is actually a real country, or at least there was something authentic about the aspiration to form a real country.

That's not true for Zionism. There were no, put it this way, read Stalin's national question.

There are no legitimate from a historical perspective or material causes or roots

for an israeli nation it's not based in any kind of objective process objective material

process by which nations form and come to be.

In the case of America, it was the case.

Let me also explain something a little different about the disposition that was going on in the time of the uh the patriots

Washington and Coe they were not just going into lands and depopulating them and saying you know

oh you know indigenous people we're just going to steal it from you and kick you out, whatever.

That happened later with Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act, right?

But the theft of land that occurred against indigenous people was not the same as the Zionist theft of land like the Nakba. It wasn't the same. Okay. And I'll explain exactly why. Okay why it was not the same sorry i had to adjust something it wasn't the same

because in the case of the encounter between the colonists and the indigenous people that lived in America,

what you had was an authentic case of mutual misrecognition.

Notice I use the word misrecognition.

It wasn't so much that there wasn't enough land for everyone to live on.

That's not true.

There was.

What actually ended up happening was that because of incommensurate and incompatible ways of life, colonists introducing methods and methods of production and ways of life that fundamentally altered the environments within which indigenous people grounded their own way of life that caused tension and that caused wars and that caused a lot of the American Indians to say we don't want these fucking people here because they're disturbing and upsetting our way of life they're driving Buffalo to extinction. They're redirecting

water away. They're

upsetting our

form of subsistence.

Right? So that was a kind of

total form

of misrecognition

where there were two

incommensurate ways of life and that's what led to conflict

it wasn't one people coming and saying this is ours now it's our birthright

and you have to fucking leave because you're you don't share our birthright and you have to fucking leave because you don't

share our birthright. It was

two people struggling to understand

why they were different,

failing to understand their differences,

that leading to conflict,

and tragically, one of the

parties to that conflict

being treated very badly

in the aftermath where they were defeated

and it's why am I saying it's tragic

because it was precisely

the methods of production

I'm not going to use Eurocentric words like superior methods of production or more advanced methods of production.

But I will say that their methods of production allowed them to have an edge and a advantage when it came to warfare

for example uh access to gunpowder i mean the whole historical development of Eurasia, that's what the colonists had at their disposal. The first Americans that were already here were literally on the other side of the world in a completely different civilizational and historical context

Okay, so they had no way of winning that encounter that battle of misrecognition there was no way for them to win and I'm not saying that justifies the inhumane way

in which Colin has treated them. I'm just saying it's not the same as Zionism. I'm not even just

talking on a moral level. I'm talking as a historical phenomena.

Objectively, you cannot compare it to Zionism.

It's something we can reflect upon and be after the fact very easily and during the fact i mean

i'm sure there's people who recognized the immorality of it all but were they able to ground that

recognition of the immorality in it in a specific class interest and something that's

compatible with the logic of history itself? Think about it. I'm just talking as a Marxist right now.

Okay. So... okay so

um

let's be clear we are not

underplaying

the

the

the

um

inhumanity with which first Americans were treated, the disrespect, the dishonorable.

That's another word, the dishonorable way in which they were treated and dealt with.

But that was not a deviation from the norm for the development and rise of capitalism

in general because you can fault the Americans.

What do we call them?

You can fault the Yankees.

It's called them the Yankees.

You can fault the Yankees.

Were they called Yankees at the time?

You can fault the European Americans.

I guess we call them that.

I don't know.

You can fault them for not properly taking into consideration and having respect for the social relations internal to the various indigenous people.

But for what it's worth, they also didn't recognize the social relations for the descendants of the colonists themselves, meaning there was no socialism for anyone.

You know, Jay Sakai has such a poisonous influence, because he is basically trying to sell this idea that, oh, yeah, the settlers had socialism, and they were, you know, this is, no, that's Israel with their

cabootsam and their labor Zionism nonsense. It was a dog-eat-dog world in the early days of capitalism.

Everyone's selling everybody, you know, everyone's flipping their neighbor for a dime.

People are, all manner of rascals and rapscallions are doing dishonorable dealings with one and another.

This is the nature of capitalism.

And I'm not saying, oh, we can just blame capitalism without understanding how capitalism

was rooted in a specific trajectory of civilization that is worthy of critical reflection, I'm just saying you can't say it's the same as Zionism or compare it to Zionism. That's all I'm saying. Because even though capitalism was evil, there is a historical authenticity to the evil development of capitalism that is not there in the case of Zionism.

Marxists recognize that capitalism was fundamentally evil based in all manner of villainy and so on and so on. But Marxists will also simultaneously recognize, and this is such a bad way of putting it because it's simplistic, but this is the word Marxist in the past use.

I'm just quoting them that capitalism was historically necessary.

Not that if we could go into the past and change things, would we have it the same way?

Absolutely not.

That's not how historical necessity is decided.

Historical necessity is like it's only through going through this evil that we were able to recognize it was evil in the first place, for example.

That's a form of historical necessity.

For example, no one can say that Nazism was historically necessary.

You understand?

Because Nazism was a reactionary phenomenon.

So the same thing is true for Zionism.

It's not historically necessary.

It was a reaction to the real trajectory of history during the time

and the historical necessity at hand during the time in which it developed, and it had always been recognized

as a reactionary phenomenon. This is why Marxists are not moral whiners. We don't just say

something is immoral, so I need to become an activist and demonstrate on the streets.

Marxists say that if something is evil, it is also reactionary and fuck this, Mike. If it's reactionary, sorry.

If it's reactionary, then it's ultimately a paper tiger.

It will not withstand ultimately the winds of history.

And our role is to awaken people to the good news of that fact.

We are here to awaken people to the good news, that the evils of this world are not our reactionary, are ultimately going to be dissolved by the development of history itself

and that doesn't mean we sit down and do nothing.

No, we need, we must invoke a revolution within consciousness to appreciate, to give voice to this fact, to give recognition to this fact. The duty as far as the superstructure, as far as consciousness is concerned, is still on us to participate in that. We still have to participate in the realm of activity, but we have to do it authentically. And if we're doing it authentically,

if our actions are authentic actions,

they are actions in conformity

with a deeper sense of historical necessity.

We are acting in a way that we believe is right.

That's real morality. Because it's not just right according to some abstract

system

of uh... of uh... moral laws that only exist in the clouds

it's literally right like in the Taoist sense.

Like, it's right in the sense of in conformity with the way things actually are.

Okay?

So that's the Marxist view in general um now i uh we really sidetracked and um went on a deal a whole different tangent, if you will.

By the way, I don't even know what I look like.

Should I...

I've been doing this the whole time.

You know, I fucking hate my setup.

I wish I could just have, like,

at my desk be, like, flat like this this and I just look directly in the camera.

But like I don't know how to do that because then I have to take the camera, put it in the middle right here, but my screen is in the way

I don't know what to fucking do

but it's really like awkward

anyway let me continue

like wouldn't it be so nice

if I could just be like this

wouldn't that be so nice

wouldn't that be so nice?

Yeah like this. Wouldn't that be so nice? Anyway, let me continue my tangent.

Exactly why is it important to recognize the Palestinian struggle as an armed struggle, not a civil rights movement?

And how should Palestinian militancy inspire us in America? And why is that inspiration so fundamental and important?

So, A, let me be very clear about something. It's not because we need to take up guns and take up arms in the U.S. and start breaking laws and waging a war of armed struggle.

That's not why.

So to be clear,

you need to think critically about what I'm about to tell you.

You need to think critically.

When I say you need to think critically. When I say

you need to think critically, it means

it's not just on the surface.

Just because

something

is militant doesn't mean

it's violent. Jezek

actually makes this point very well.

Militancy and violence are not necessarily the same thing.

Political militancy, the kind that we should be inspired by, and which is, see, why is it important to have solidarity with the armed resistance in Palestine? Because it's important to recognize that it fits within the context of a global form of militant subjectivity,

which also has fertile ground for the application in the United States, not in a violent way, of course, not insofar as we still have at least a veneer of law and order and a sense of a shared single country that we're all part of and we're all citizens of.

But in the sense of, if you will, a sense of subjective partisanship, a sense of the recognition that we must

fundamentally reject the regime in the United States. We must fundamentally reject it in the militant sense of the word.

I'm not talking about violence.

In the militant sense of a rejection of a fundamental form of partisanship based on an American, based upon a distinction between the regime and the people and Americans as a community.

And that should be inspired by the Palestinian resistance.

Just like the Palestinians have a sense of subjective identity

that is rooted in their communities and their neighborhoods

and their families and their land and just in the same way that they can recognize the

distinction between that authentic form of social existence and and that authentic form of subjectivity, social subjectivity, versus the Zionist occupation. We must have a similar form of political militancy, of partisan subjectivityivity that also dichotomizes

the relationship between

the American people and the regime

in the same way as a foreign

occupier, that this country

is under occupation.

But why, so you're saying, saying haz why don't you advocate for arms struggle well besides the fact that i'm not a fed and uh it's illegal to i actually have a

reason for it besides the fact that i'm not allowed i'm not just telling you this because it's illegal

by the way i also think in a principled sense there's there's no reason for any kind of

armed struggle at all in the u.s right now i could tell you. Because the occupation does not take a directly violent form.

Most people are not even aware of the occupation. So if most Americans are not even aware that they're

under occupation, it would be a ridiculous and silly form of

adventurism to advocate for any kind of armed struggle whatsoever. It's also a ridiculous and silly

form of adventurism to do so when the form the occupation takes is not one of a violent form we don't

have it's not like the idf is is treating the american people the same way the idf treats the palestinians

i know people will make comparisons of the militarization of the police and yeah yeah i understand

that they may be preparing for that you know some kind of martial law whatever we may be preparing for that, you know, some kind of martial

law, whatever. We may be going in that

direction somehow,

but we are, at least

we're not there yet.

And you can discern that in the very

state of Americans' consciousness.

Okay? So that in the very state of Americans consciousness. Okay.

So, militancy doesn't, but we should still have militancy.

But militancy doesn't mean violence.

And why am I emphasizing militancy? Because BDS and all these other people that find

the Palestinian armed resistance to be problematic, they don't have a militant subjectivity.

They are still civil society activists, not political partisans or militants. And it's not because they're peaceful. We're

also peaceful. There's nothing wrong with being peaceful. It's because of their relationship to the

regime. It's because they don't strive for political independence they don't strive for any kind of

um re assertion of popular sovereignty beyond the form that we have currently they also they also don't do any job whatsoever of linking up the Palestinian struggle with any kind of struggle in America whatsoever for popular sovereignty.

They just see it as a benevolent, activist, and

selfless moral cause.

And we don't

have anything wrong. We don't have anything

against morality, but morality needs

to be united with its

concrete material premises.

Meaning,

we shouldn't just look at the Palestinians and then make that think that

we're such good people

that we're selflessly supporting them.

We should also allow it to inspire us

to be open to a new horizon of political militancy and partisanship

within our own context. The Palestinian struggle doesn't just reveal a moral necessity it also reveals a need to change how we think about how the world works, how the system works, what the relationship

between the hegemony and the people actually is, because the truth of that relationship

is revealed in Palestine. And that's what's at stake in that struggle the same methods that they use against the Palestinian people they will eventually use against everyone the hegemony in the West they'll use it against yellow vests in France

they'll use it against those farmers in the Netherlands they'll use it against the

farmers in Germany they'll use it against Americans they'll it, and they are increasingly using the same methods of Israeli police state surveillance and oppression and brutality.

And they're modeling police departments off of the IDF itself, militarizing them on that basis.

So we need to recognize what's at stake in Palestine isn't just something far off like it's their noble savages.

No, we do share a dimension

and a plain of struggle

with the Palestinian people.

And we need to develop and cultivate

a subjectivity that's worthy of

that.

You know?

Exactly.

Zionism is a template of control.

What's going on in Gaza should force us to rethink and question how we understand how the world works and what lengths the elites are willing to go to to suppress popular sovereignty.

The nature, it's important also to understand the nature of the antagonism,

not just respond to the antagonism.

Also understand the nature of the contradictions.

Not just respond to them or formulate your own unique ideas about them but also formulate an understanding of the contradictions themselves so

that's why it's so important to have spiritual solidarity with the armed resistance in Palestine.

It's not because we want to take up armed struggle here.

It's not because you should be materially supporting U.S. designated terror organizations and thereby go to prison or whatever and violate the law.

It's not because you should just be edgy and just promote violence for violence sake. It's because you should recognize within the context of

Palestine, armed resistance and armed struggle is fully justifiable. Obviously it is. I just pointed to

the president of the American

Revolution of 1776

to show how this is not an extreme position

at all. A people have a

right to resist occupation by a

foreign power.

Of course they do. Why wouldn't they?

American of course they do why wouldn't they Americans agree with this if you just present them with the proper context and give them the proper analogy with which to relate it

it's very very very clear I mean of course they, of course they are. Of course they're within

their right to take up the gun in Palestine. Why wouldn't they be? It's like people who say,

oh, they should just be peaceful. It's like, be peaceful to what? They are not Israelis. This isn't a civil

rights struggle going on in

Israel. It's a war. It's actually

a war.

Okay.

It's so

ridiculous. It's a war.

What do you think again in america most americans are not

aware that we're under occupation okay most and and finally um the nature of the occupation is mostly nonviolent in America.

The main weapon of occupation in America is debt.

Now, if a movement in America forms, a peaceful movement, okay, that forms around the question of abolishing the debt, maybe they will show their fangs more and then it will start getting really violent and there's going to be martial law

and they're going to be taking families and slaughtering them in their homes like the IDF does and stuff

maybe and then maybe that would be a pretext for something to happen i don't know but we're nowhere near there right now. That's what I'm trying

to say. Another context in which armed militancy would be obviously expected is if there's a civil war and law and order just breaks down and it's just full chaos, every man for himself, and communities need to find ways to defend themselves.

That would be another context, which probably isn't all that improbable given the direction of things but obviously it's not

appropriate to discuss armed struggle within the context of today's america it's just not it's

just ridiculous and stupid.

So I want to be clear about...

I think I've exhausted everything I wanted to exhaust on that topic.

Now the fun part of the stream is going to come, but not before the criticism of the, I want to make a criticism because it was brought to my attention.

And it would also be a self-criticism, all right?

And I'm sick of having to address this topic okay guys um you know that maxim gorky quote why don't we stop sharing images of that quote?

Just stop doing it.

I understand that the person who shared it in this context was doing it as a form of anti-fascist propaganda, not anti-LGB propaganda, just anti-fascist propaganda.

But

stop giving our enemies ammunition

and making it seem like we want to exterminate

homosexuals or something. that cannot be further from the truth.

And I know you know that's not what you mean by it. I know that's not what anyone means by it. But if some journalist sees you sharing that, guess what they're going to print in their article? You know, oh, this infrared member quotes Maxim Gorky and calls for the extermination of homosexuals to defeat fascism. That's not our position. So be optically aware

of what you're doing and whether that's honestly conveying what our actual position is. But to be

clear, what's the quote?

The quote is by Maxim Gorky.

And I'm actually going to talk about that quote because it's being, and I'll do say, I was

edgy last year and I shared the image myself.

It's not what I meant by it, but, like, optically speaking, it's conveying something we don't mean it to convey.

Now, let me be clear about what Maxim Gorky's actual position was.

Maxim Gorky was not calling for the extermination of gay people.

He wasn't doing that.

And the quote is being taken out of context.

And I'll give you the context.

Maxim Gorky was writing about the psychopathology of fascism, which I don't think we disagree with. Okay. But then he was saying there is already a sarcastic saying exterminate all the gay people and fascism the fascists will disappear notice what he said he said it's a sarc saying, meaning the point of the saying was to illustrate the relationship between the two, not to say that people who are sexual minorities should be exterminated.

That was a sarcastic saying that he was drawing attention to for literary purposes.

He was a literary author and writer. Even during the criminalization of sodomy, the Soviet criminal in the Soviet criminal code, there was no death penalty for gay people. That wasn't the position of maxim gorky or the so

let's not let's not uh try to make it seem like that's our view because it's not

it's genuinely not our view

like it's i'm not even just saying this for optics reasons

it's not what we believe we obviously don't believe people should be killed for

listen it's just so ridiculous because you need to think about it at the face of it all right

the most extreme hill that we die on, okay, the most extreme hill that we die on is that we believe it's a phenomena that is the result of some other cause such as like capitalist decadence or something right

that's the most extreme so you shouldn't blame the victims or you shouldn't blame the symptoms.

You should focus on the cause.

You shouldn't – I mean, look, guys, you know, I really need to emphasize something.

As communists, you need to start being very responsible and mature.

Because guess what? In our society, many families have relatives who are gay, who are

lesbian, something else, whatever, transgender.

Nobody's saying we have to encourage that stuff and put it into schools, or we have to think that it's a positive phenomena.

Clearly, the amount of suffering that it causes, it's obviously not a positive phenomenon.

It causes so much suffering.

But as communists, our opportunity to distinguish ourselves is how we respond to that phenomena.

Do we torture? Do we torture and abuse and denigrate the people who are involved in this mass state of confusion and so on? No. As a matter of fact, that's the point. The whole reason we draw attention to the connection between the far right and sexual deviancy is because they're very edgy stance on this matter of just trying to kill

everyone or torture them

for not being heterosexual

that itself

evinces a

form of edginess,

extremism,

and sexual deviancy

that they themselves

are being just

hypocritical about

that they themselves have.

You know?

Our you know um our problem is not with individuals we are not here to judge individuals and torture them let me be clear about that i don't have any patience for torturers, for sadistic scumbags

who take pleasure in torturing and berating people because they're going through these kinds of

problems. Now, you can tell me about Afghanistan or you could tell me about Iran. Those are totally different societies. In America, the meaning of being someone who has edgy views against these people is totally different it's a totally different thing okay as communists

we need to take responsibility and have a mature outlook which targets the root causes of all forms of socially disruptive harmful and

negative phenomena which is not individuals which is things like big pharma which is not individuals, which is things like Big Pharma, which is things like the mass media, right?

Which is things like the doings of various different kinds of institutions, right?

Which is the most fundamental thing, and I'm surprised, where Marx is here, we should be focusing on what matters, the way in which capitalism has fundamentally disrupted and made impossible any kind of stable, normal way of life.

Now, that so obviously is going to cause disruptions in the sphere of how people reproduce their existence, which is the family, and which is families.

It's going to cause antisocial disruptions and confusion on a mass scale.

You know, many leftists

will propose we say,

Haas, why do you defend the bourgeois family?

I don't.

It's the bourgeois family,

which is the cause.

But the bourgeois family

is not the same as monogamy.

The bourgeois family is not the same

as a normal monogamous family because that existed under socialism and had existed under socialism as well. The bourgeois family transforms the relationship between the sexes and reproduction into a commodity. This is the root cause of

pornography and all these other kinds of things, which just fundamentally are forms of alienation.

Okay. And I'm not telling you guys to feel guilty about the jokes that you tell in private i'm telling you guys to be

responsible in terms of the messaging you're engaging in and be mindful of how that registers to people outside of your own echo chamber

and your own community because guess what what you're doing is anti people it's edgy and antisocial

it's just as calling for the killing of gay people is just as edgy and antisocial as LGBT activists themselves.

And it's not the way. You know, it's not what we believe either. We believe in healing this country. We believe in what's in the welfare of the people we believe in people

being able to rise above their turmoil and confusion on a mass scale and um we believe in a healthy society we don't believe in torturing people sadistically because of

whatever afflictions are coming upon i mean torturing is not the solution guys that's not all that's all that's all

you're doing by you're just torturing people and i'm fully i fully oppose that i fully fully

oppose that and i also oppose individually judging people.

I oppose that as well.

You shouldn't individually think you're better than someone

because ultimately, you know,

your responsibility is to what's social and what's collective.

An individual, leave that to their father and their mother and their family and the close ones in their lives.

Because I guarantee you

they're already struggling with all that.

You as a person

have no right to interfere in

another person's privacy

unless there's abuse of

children going on, of course. But you

otherwise, you have no right

to kind of make

yourself relevant on

the level of some individual's life

when it comes to their privacy.

Again, unless there's some kind of abuse going on,

your responsibility is to it you should have a wider more lofty kind of a deeper outlook not this petty you know um trashy outlook where you're just going to just attack people. You should have a wide, sweeping outlook where you are thinking about the general public. You're thinking about the people. You're thinking at the social level the historical level right and um I don't know what the fuck is...

Can we get these weird people out of the chat talking...

What the fuck am I even looking at here?

Yeah. I even looking at here. Yeah, I mean, wow.

I don't want to talk about this a second time, you know?

I want to make myself clear one time, and that's it.

Okay?

Ask yourself the question.

In China, they don't do this edgy shit.

Communist Party cadres don't do this edgy shit.

They have a well-rounded perspective that's mature and professional.

And I'll do some self-criticism.

When I get angry, I use some slurs sometimes, you know?

And I think about it.

And it's like, in private, there's nothing wrong with it. And sometimes I just get angry and I'm like, fuck it, I don't care anymore. And I breach the form formality. And I like, you know, but I don't actually, I'm not trying to be hateful toward actual gay people. I'm not even talking about them. It's just a word that culturally is associated with someone who's dishonorable. And yeah, there's a, I guess it's a it's politically incorrect

but like that's not what I mean

I'm not I'm obviously not referring to that

um

but I

I am striving to not even swear in general, you know.

I know I just swore before, but it's for the sake of communist excellency that we're striving for.

And I'm not a perfect person.

By the way, I'm not a perfect person. By the way, I'm not a perfect person. I'm not a

perfect person. Like I said, I can get angry and whatever. I can get angry and say really mean things.

Two individuals I don't like, but not because of...

See, it's never because someone's just a stranger and I have an issue with them because of something that has nothing to do with me.

It's if someone

engages in a dishonorable way with me,

I have personal beef with them and whatever.

Like, nothing's off the table.

But, you know, things,

just like what happened at Emory, you know, when we were talking about it on stream, it gets taken out of context. And suddenly people are trying to say, I'm attacking all the protesters because of my social views and cultural views, which when I was just like I had issue with like a specific group of people who i

actually um had beef with on a personal level you know um So yeah.

We can go to Star Wars, I guess.

I think that's all I wanted to say on that. We're not, yeah, yeah, I'm not saying you have to be politically correct by, I'm not saying you have to be politically correct. But do you really

have to do the whole exterminate?

I mean, look,

I'm not saying you can't

share Salaf memes

because it's an inside joke no one understands.

And at that point,

someone has to reach and really go out of their way to like

accuse us of anything when we're just sharing a great photo of darts say loth the wise all right

but be mindful of the words you're sharing and using and it's all I'm trying to say okay

it's all I'm trying to say say say the N word too i think that's fundamentally different i don't think there's i don't think the hard r n word

i don't think there's any context for using that word unless unless you're like, I guess, reading Huckleberry Finn or some shit.

But otherwise, like, I don't think there's any context for using that word just to use a forbidden word.

Whereas the word that I use is extremely common 10 years ago when I was growing up to just describe people you don't like in general and saying nothing.

Yeah, and still is, right?

There is absolutely nothing comparable. Yeah, and still is, right?

There is absolutely nothing comparable.

So that's just wrong, okay?

But again, if you're a front,

if you're a forward-facing communist,

shouldn't, and you're in public facing communist shouldn't and you're in public you shouldn't be swearing all that much anyway to be honest you're not as divorced um i don't know what you're talking about, dude.

There's no way to be wedded to the N word with a hard R unless you're a slave owner from the 1900s.

Or you are like your dad is in the KKK and you live in the South like a hundred years ago or something.

I don't know how you could be wedded to that word on a...

It's not a word culturally ingrained in our society in any kind of way.

It doesn't have any cultural meaning

whatsoever in our society.

It has no vernacular meaning

whatsoever in our society.

It purely has a historical meaning,

purely rooted in racism,

and nothing else. It's just a historical

term. And the only only people the only real

cultural relevance it has in our society is either intentionally being hateful or it's a joke to

just be edgy and say something forbidden and nothing else so I really disagree with that view.

I really disagree with that view.

I really disagree with that view.

I don't think, like, you can't be divorced from the N-word because there's no way to be wedded to it in the first

place. There's no cultural context

you come from today.

The word

was more normal

for us. Same with the R word.

But

yeah, I mean, you know what? Marks used the N word with a hard R. And it meant, it didn't mean the same thing as it does now. Like, back then, that's actually the word that they used, you know, and we don't use that word anymore because it's acquired a very specific meaning.

But no, I'm not canceling marks for a word he used 150 years ago.

Sorry, I'm just not.

I'm also not calling for Huckleberry Finn to be banned or any of that other nonsense. Sorry, history is history,

and you have to, you have to, you can't erase it. You have to actually, yeah, they used a word that

today means something much more specific than what it did at the time.

And even if it did mean that at the time, you can't erase that from history.

You know?

What about rap lyrics?

Here's my take on rap lyrics

all right

um

I don't give a shit

that's my take on it

don't do it in public

if you're a communist.

I guess it just depends on, you know, who your friends are.

But do I think if your friend is using rap lyrics, should you get mad at them for like singing along to them if you're not even black yourself? I just think that's so cringe. I've seen instances in which black people take offense to like white friends or people around them for singing along to the lyrics, taking it as a form of

disrespect. And I can't really comment on that. I can't really say they're wrong or right. I mean,

I can't really comment on it, you know? It is what they feel like it's a form of disrespect.

I wouldn't know anything about that.

That's just between you and your friends then.

If you have a black friend, he's got, that's between you and him.

Sort it out.

Don't ask me about it.

Ask him. You know what I mean mean that's kind of my take on

it like instead you need to get out of the habit of like trying to find a universal prescription

for like what words you can and can't use or what you can and can't do. It should be situated in a concrete

context where you're not answerable to streamers like me. You're answerable to the people

around you that you actually care about and who you respect and whose opinions about you actually matter to you

that's what you should think of it as you know you should just be accountable to the people

in your life you care about and who matter to you don't ask me about it because what am i i can't give

you a pass you know um um um um okay uh i'm uh i'm really postponing star wars here

why do i want to talk about Star Wars

um

because I was thinking about it the other day and

we're talking about the I want to talk about the Star Wars the story of Star Wars and the prequel

so okay fuck Star Wars look Star Wars is Reddit but guess what else Star Wars is

fundamentally part of the fabric of contemporary American popular culture for generations, not just one generation.

Can everyone shut the fuck up about the N-word and can we actually talk about something

Very serious Star Wars

Just kidding

Let me let me uh talk about this for a second

When I say I want to talk about Star Wars, I want to talk about the story that's central to Star Wars, which is the fall of the republic and the rise of Darth Vader.

I don't want to talk about the recent Star Wars movies because I have not seen them.

I also don't want to see them.

And I'll, I can tell you why.

My brief criticism of the recent Star Wars films, from the scenes that I've seen of them is they're very retro and they're very

nostalgia tinted, quite literally, the filters used on the camera. I really hate how 80s they try and make it look.

Because when you think about Star Wars that came out in 1977, it's kind of fucking crazy historically.

Think about that for a second.

The same century in which Lenin was living is the same century Star Wars came out in. Which is just so crazy to think about. This is what got me on strain of thought. But at the time, the significance of Star Wars was that the theme of the film,

which is this science fiction, was united with the form itself. It was using cutting-edge special effects and film technology, special effects technologies that blew audiences away. They're like, oh my God, these lightsabers are like, that was the appeal of star wars in part okay and i can really

kind of delve into it although i don't want to it's not my main focus i want to talk about the

story um of the prequels not of the

the 80s ones that's kind of beyond my depth

I actually don't remember those all that well

I grew up with the prequels that's my gender

every generation has their own Star Wars

mine was the prequels that's what I grew up with.

There's some of the first movies I watched growing up, actually.

Anyway, let me continue. The 80s

Star Wars films, part of

what made Star Wars what it was, was

the use of cutting edge technologies.

So the recent ones

that are kind of employing

this retro going deliberately

trying to like use crappy outdated special effects and stuff to evoke the authenticity of the 80s

I just fundamentally reject that and I have no interest in it so I actually haven't seen any of the new Disney Star Wars films at all.

I'm not a big Star Wars fan, to be honest.

I'm not a Star Wars fan at all, actually.

The only reason I'm giving Star Wars the significance that it does is because following

Xijs line, truth takes on the structure of a fiction.

I believe truth takes on the structure of fiction.

I believe that in order for some things truth to be fully appreciated, sorry, in order for a fundamental truth of a given kind of historical, subjective, even objective position, kind of orientation, virtual orientation of history itself,

the existential status of a given da sign or a subject, whatever you want to call it,

that takes on the structure of a fiction.

And that's exactly what I want to talk about.

An ideology, kind of in the spirit of Gizek's critique of ideology.

And it's not going to be as deep as you think.

It's actually going to be a kind of fun and lighthearted,

but I wanted to get it off my chest. But before I do that, I want to talk about the significance

of Star Wars in general from the 80s and like how Star Wars won the Cold War. Because when,

you know, you harken back to the 80s, and it's like Reagan, he's coming out

with the Star Wars, literal, he called it Star Wars, the satellite laser program to let

for, that put him in a clash with the Soviets.

And this newfound demonization

and anti-communism against the Soviet Union

depicting it as an evil empire. And it's like the aesthetics of the empire within Star Wars, like a red, glowing red, lightsaber, and it's like this grand, powerful empire, evil. It's like that's so Soviet-coded.

You know?

Exactly. Star Wars is a huge cultural victory point in the West.

Because let me tell you why. Because I'm not trying to say it was the first fantasy film. It wasn't. It wasn't the first fiction film either. But up until that point, all science fiction, sorry, all cinema, all literature was immersed within the Cold War directly and had some kind of real world reference point to which it was directly drawing inspiration from in some kind of way. It was making some kind of

commentary in a clearly historicizable way. But Star Wars begins a long time ago in a galaxy

far, far away.

And it's kind of presenting this huge metaphysical vision of the force,

and we'll get to that in a second.

And the combination of science fiction with the latest technologies in special effects themselves,

which got people really excited about what the future will look like, the stars, the cosmological vision.

That is what kind of made Star Wars not just a film, but a form of world building, a kind of like universe people felt like they were dwelling in and directly identifying with in a lot of ways right but um that's kind of one of the first fandom cultures sub subcultures, all this kind of stuff.

Yada, yada, yada. Anyway, to continue.

Star Wars was a kind of aestheticization of the intangibility and ethereality of virtual technologies, quite literally, actually, this virtual era of capitalism, the increasing level of

financial speculation, reaching unprecedented levels, the rise of information technology, and so on and so

forth.

And Star Wars was really the kind of ultimate aestheticization of that as a high point of

the cultural victory of the West over the East.

Soviet cinema had great films.

Tarkovsky's.

I'm such a Philistine.

I forgot his

Solaris, right?

Solaris.

It had these kinds of films

and stuff but

they weren't these all

encompassing mythological

stories of the heroes journey

and this world building

there's something so interesting

strange about Star Wars, how it was intentionally a kind of hero's journey drawing from Joseph Campbell or whatever.

But how also the story of the hero's journey is not just a motif of

fiction. It's a fundamental

motif of

the legitimation of

state authority in the first

place. But Star Wars

twists this logic

such that it's not a founding myth of the state that the hero's journey is being depicted as.

It's more kind of like something that doesn't seem to have any basis in history.

I'm not just saying this because it's fiction.

That's the obvious part. But it's like the structure of the hero's journey

within Star Wars was

a kind of hyperstitional

political myth.

In the sense that Ronald Reagan

in order to

legitimate himself

has to compare

himself to

Star Wars

in the sense

that Zelensky

today

in order to

legitimate himself to Western audiences, has to compare himself within the logic of Star Wars.

So that's what I mean by a kind of like hyperstitional political myth. It's not a political myth that talks about the mythological founding of the state.

It's a hypersitional political mythology, which establishes the boundaries by which political consciousness and political authority itself relates itself to on a metaphysical

level, on a psychological level, and on an ideological level, right? So I think that's an extremely

interesting significance of the Star Wars thing in general.

Okay, now for the fun part, we're going to talk about the prequels,

because I don't want to talk about the complex aspects at all anymore.

I still have one last thing to talk about

before we get into the fun part.

And that's the force.

Now that's a very interesting thing.

That is the kind of metaphysical

commitment of Star Wars. this idea of the force.

And what is the force?

It's this ultimate reference to...

It's so strange it's like you have on the one hand

the underlying metaphysics of capitalist relations

of production for example described in capital itself by Marx

through the commodity form and so on and so on,

the universalism of the commodity form and how it's a real abstraction. It's an abstraction that

works in reality. But then you have this aestheticization of this all-permeating metaphysical substance that is taken by us implicitly within our reality.

And then it's explicitly given a phenomenal representation, forward-facing, phenomenal representation in this kind of Star Wars films. But that's what the force is. The force is the kind of metaphysical substance of modern capitalism itself, of modernity itself, modern civilization itself,

not just capitalism, modern civilization itself.

And it's, and it, and it had been taken to such a logical conclusion, although the tendencies

were already there from the, from the beginning. For example, although the tendencies were already there

from the beginning. For example,

in the 19th and early

20th centuries, you had the

theosophists. You had Arthur

Schopenhauer.

You had Nietzsche. You had the

theosophis.

Which kind of are articulating the metaphysical substance of modernity through the lens of Eastern spiritualism and Eastern philosophy and Buddhism and Taoism and so on and so on.

And that kind of goes through Alistair Crowley and the kind of Thelima, and that kind of trickles its way into the counterculture,

where it eventually finds its way into Star Wars.

And that's the force, this kind of concept of the force within Star Wars is a kind of a culmination you can call the substance of spinoza you can call the object of hobbs and francis bacon and so on you can

call that the force if you want that That's their kind of materialism of the force. You know, just pure force, nothing else. Pure force, pure being, pure substance. A pure kind of object, which is totally indifferent and totally outside and totally abstracted from, brutally, kind of isolated from any semblance of human quality, commitment, or character.

That's what the force is, by the way.

It's a kind of force of the alienation, right?

The same thing.

Anyway, uh... of the alienation right the same thing anyway uh so that's the force that's the force uh i had to talk about that now we can get in yeah it's like the will of chopin hour sure why not, why not? Why not? Anyway, guys, let's get into the fun part, which is talking about the prequels, just like Alex Jones. So I think in the spirit of what I always love doing, which is subverting a fiction from within by asking the question of how you can resolve the underlying conflict or contradiction at the heart of a fiction imminently and through the terms of the fiction itself.

Such that I am capable of saying that the Star Wars prequels are propaganda.

We just got the Jedi's perspective, and it was a one-sided perspective, and it was total propaganda.

And for a second, let's imagine that that whole...

See, this is interesting to think about, because

you would... It would be easy to just say, like, the very form of that fiction is, of course, tied to that story.

So you can't just say that Emperor Palpatine and Darth Vader were actually the good guys because it's integral to the very nature of the story itself and the world and the fiction itself that the contrary is true. But I think that underestimates

what is at stake in a given fiction. I think that works like the last ring bearer, that Russian work, that's subverting the Lord of the Ring, saying that Sauron was the good guy.

That is a work of heroism in a kind of way.

It's such a...

It's such an authentic

way of

um

of flushing out

the unconscious truth that is

repressed in the given form of a fiction

in order to understand the unconscious truth repressed or occluded within a fiction,

you have to entertain the structure and the form of the fiction itself and respond to it on its own terms and i think this is

very possible in the um case of the prequels let's say uh like let's actually tell the story of what really happened and how the prequels represent the kind of unconscious

uh let's say the unconscious of uh of uh what would i call it besides postmodern liberalism the unconscious of kind of um neoliberalism let's call it that the unconscious of the way the unconscious of neoliberalism uh responds to and reacts to its own

contradictions is in the very structure of the star Wars films, specifically in this case the prequels.

And we can kind of resolve that contradiction and bring it to light by presenting counterfactuals within the form of the fiction itself.

For example.

And say, no, this is how it really was.

And this is what the liberal mind was trying to repress and was struggling to reveal and be authentically honest with.

So let me begin. I forgot the first Star Wars film, but the second and third ones I'm more familiar with.

But I understand the

wider plot. Let me give you

a brief synopsis of Star Wars

now. Now for the fun part. This is the actual fun

part everyone's waiting for. Ready?

I'll tell you exactly what

happened within Star Wars.

It's going to blow your fucking mind.

Are you ready?

Are you ready?

The Galactic Republic... the galactic republic

the galactic republic

was founded by the peoples of the galaxy

to represent their common interests

it was a republic right the problem was that the republic was increasingly becoming corrupt, and that was specifically owing to the influence and the rise of an oligarchy within the republic that started to control the republic from behind the scenes in a way that was unaccountable to everyone. A new patrician class, a noble class emerged within the Galactic Republic and they called themselves the Jedi.

Okay. The Jedi Jedi. Okay?

The Jedi Council.

The Jedi Council were the most reactionary, fascistic, Hitlerite, oligarchical, corrupt reactionaries, if I said reactionary already

to have ever

existed in

the history

of the

republic and

they emerged

on the basis

of a number

of founding

lies that they

were telling

and this is

serious stuff, guys.

Okay, I'm telling you the real story.

And I'll describe how the films themselves were lying to the audience about what happened

and how they were overlooking everything.

And what precisely because of what they weren't showing you.

Okay? First of all the jedi

had a monopoly on this thing they called the force but you know what the force actually just was referring to the whole time there was nothing magical about the force the force

referred to a new discovery in what then they would call physics that what the jedi did is they

monopolized the discovery they prevented anyone else from having

any access to it and any time a scientist anytime anyone such as a kind of equivalent of

trofem lysenko was trying to investigate this new physical phenomena in a way that was to the

benefit of the people, the Jedi would kill them. And you know what the Jedi would say? They would say,

you were going to the dark side. You want to know what the dark side is, the dark side

is just referring to

forms of scientific investigation

that the Jedi were irrationally

repressing. It was literally like the dark

ages, pretty much, where they were basically repressing. They were calling all non-institutionally gate-kept forms of the investigation of the force, the dark side.

And it was only dark because it wasn't considered legitimate within the Jedi institution.

So it was literally like the Mendelians in what they did to Lysenko.

Lysenko was a Sith lord when you think about it.

He was exploring the dark side of modern science, and they got him for it.

And they smeared and slandered him throughout all of history because of it.

Okay.

Now, let me explain something to you, because this is really important.

The Sith is a legend.

There's no such thing as Sith.

The word Sith is the same thing as

how liberals use the word fascist or

Nazbel. Nobody's actually a

Sith. In fact, the only

actual Sith in history was

a Jedi, Adolf Hitler,

or their equivalent of them.

But a Sith is just a smear word for any Hitler or their equivalent of them.

But a Sith is just a smear word for anyone who's using or investigating the force in ways that don't conform to the Jedi Libtards.

Okay?

That's basically the truth.

The Sith is a fully invented political smear term.

Nobody goes by that.

Nobody calls himself a Sith.

Okay.

Now, I want to draw some curious attention, a curious detail, because I'll admit something.

Within the last week, I watched both the Star Wars movies on different days at night.

I watched both of them.

That's why I'm going on this rant.

Okay?

I watched Attack of the Clones

and I watched

Revenge of the Sith.

And you know what?

They're pretty good film.

I'm not going to lie.

I watched them both

and they're pretty good.

But now I want to talk about them.

All right?

I didn't watch them last, but within the past week.

Anyway, um, so let me continue, all right?

Let me continue.

Because we're on to something, right?

We're onto something.

Anyway, look, here are the facts.

Okay.

Star Wars, the Jedi...

I'm not going to use slurs, all right?

The Jedi, they're very unnatural and, you know, abnormal.

But they literally,ita I was thinking like

why is Zelensky so into Star Wars

when I was watching this?

I get it now

because the Jedi are fucking irrational

soying libitards

and you

can't reason with them. When

Palpatine was literally just saying like

look like there's things

about this force like we don't fully understand

and like there's other ways of

looking at it and you don't have the be all end all

monopoly on.

They're like, no, that's the dark side.

That's the, we have to kill you because you're in the, you're tainted by the dark side now.

And it's like, holy shit, that literally sounds like destiny when he's saying I have to be killed

or something because like I'm giving an alternative perspective about Ukraine.

And I'm like, that is such the epitome of liberal consciousness where it's like, it's what Dugan calls the new kind of liberal totalitarianism.

Just by hearing Dugan out, just by hearing Putin out, just by hearing what the Chinese have to say, just by hearing the alternate perspective, you're on the dark side, you're a propagandist, you need to be cut off, you're a dangerous rudge and agent, and you have to be censored.

Isn't that literally the default liberal mentality today?

It's a discursive barrier they're erecting such that liberalism and political correctness, that's the new totalitarianism.

They're putting a discursive barrier between themselves and the other, which just cannot be breached.

And it's like, this is how Pan-Lefts treat us because they're under the umbrella of liberalism. But more fundamentally, this is how they treat anyone who tries to offer a perspective that's just outside the liberal hegemony in general. And it's not that we are the totalitarians who are intolerant of other views.

They are intolerant of other views.

And when I was watching those Star Wars movies, I'm like, damn, the Jedi are literally

lip-tards.

They're so, like, intolerant of just like alternative views

on this force shit

and I'm like I can't

and I was thinking I can't believe an entire

generation

watched these movies and

unironically like

agreed with these this propaganda and thought oh that's that this is a good like

movie to teach you a lesson about how to be like a good a person of good character when nothing

could be further from the truth like the truth is Obi-1 is such a piece

of shit.

I fucking hate him.

You want to know

why I fucking hate

Obi-Wan?

All right?

I really thought

Anakin was in the right

because that little

bitch,

Obi-Wan...

Yo, Emila,

what's up?

Listen,

Obi-Wan, who literally such a despicable, like, low-tie lip-tard, he probably was fucking wearing a mask during COVID, if you think about it.

When Padme is getting on the ship

to go see Anakin

Obi-Wan's bitch ass

snuck on the ship I didn't know that

he snuck on without her knowledge

dude dude

it's crazy how much

nobody's pointing any attention to this.

When Padmae lands on that fire planet and goes to see Anakin,

and she's like telling Anakin she doesn't want to hear,

Anakin suddenly gets pissed at her

like really quick why

because Obi-Wan

randomly appears

in the cockpit

and look how he's standing

he's standing like this

I just fuck your bitch

I just fuck that bitch I just fuck

That's what he's standing like

Like if I was Anakin

I would think the same thing

Because immediately his mind

jumps to the conclusion

Like damn this bitch is

Obi-Wan is turning his bitch against me

And they're in cahoots, doing God knows what, on that long trip.

Crass! What's up? Doing God knows what on that long trip to this planet.

Why didn't anyone speak up and just be like, yo, this dude snuck on the ship.

They were not...

Because, like, this...

I didn't notice what happened.

Obi-Wan went to Padmae and was like, yo, I have to go do something about Anakin.

And Padmae wasn't snitching

on her man. So, Obi-Wan is like,

all right, whatever, I'm going to go.

So then, but she decides to go visit Anakin

just because she was worried about him, and

Obi-Wan snuck on the ship. So Anakin

literally thought his girl sold

him out.

And Obi-Wan's bitch ass would not even tell the truth.

Like he was like doing this, making it seem like he just fucked his bitch.

And then he's like, you have done that yourself.

It's like, bro, can you tell the truth about what just happened?

Because, like, I feel like some context would, like, just admit you snuck on.

Anyway, that's why, that's just a personal issue.

I have personal beef with OBB.

Because I understand Anakin.

Like, I would be just as pissed.

Okay? I would be just as pissed.

Anyway,

um,

let me continue.

All right? Let me continue.

That was just a rant. I'm going to continue with this. All right? Let me continue. That was just a rant.

I'm going to continue with this, all right?

This is a rare treat I'm giving, y'all, for the stream.

I deserve 100 subs for this.

Just kidding.

Just kidding.

Anyway, uh...

Anyway, look, anyway, look,

let me continue, all right?

Uh,

so there's a lot of facts you don't ever see in Star Wars, such as,

what is the perspective and the opinion of the common people?

Because we're seeing all this politics stuff happening. perspective and the opinion of the common people because

we're seeing all this politics

stuff happening but

we're not, yo, Mecca

Sith Lord, wow. Message received.

No, we're not going to happen.

No. I am Mecca storm

trigger number 375,000

not going to happen.

Nope.

Escape the Jedi box.

No, no.

Exterminate the rebels.

And fascism will vanish.

No, no.

Don't actually start

fucking repping

Star Wars shit

aesthetically. I'm issuing

order 66 to my

community. Do not fucking

start adopting Star

Wars aesthetics and

mixing that with infrared because it's got

nothing to do with infrared.

We don't rep that shitty version of science fiction around here, all right?

Anyway, I'm just talking, because that's such a cultural significance in this country,

and I saw Alex Jones talk about it, so that's why I'm going to talk about it.

All right.

Anyway, look, they don't show, because all politics is about the people.

It's all about, like, what is the common folk think?

What are the 95% of the people living in this galactic empire how are all these

we're we don't see that context but i want to refill those films and like this is what

really happened the true story of star wars right the? The prequels. Because here's what was happening.

The Jedi were pedophile rapists, just like Jeffrey Epstein. Just like the elites today.

Think about it.

Think about it.

No, no, no.

Think about it.

The Jedi,

who was funding them?

Where were they getting their money from?

They were getting their money, first of all, from usury. They were they getting their money from? They were getting their money, first

of all, from usury.

They were usurers.

They acted all

high and mighty, and they were

stealing and kidnapping children

from across the galaxy

who were enslaved, and they were corrupt and debauched monsters.

And that's how society saw them.

Yeah, they hid them in their secret temples.

All right.

All right, maybe it's too far to call them

pedophile rapists.

But

they were corrupt. They were deeply corrupt.

They were gatekeepers.

They were hated by the common people because gatekeepers they were

hated by the common

people because they were just

usurers they were just constantly

they made all their money through these loans

that were impossible to pay back

and I'm going to explain something

I'm going to blow your fucking mind because I'm the only person who put two and two together, right? Just give me, yeah, they, yeah, and they had slaves too and shit. They were so fucked up. Listen, this is something that you're not familiar with

all right

this is something you're not

familiar with

what

so according to the propaganda we're're told that Emperor Palpatine is the one who started the war between the Galactic Republic and the Confederation and Count Duku, right? Not true. That was just propaganda. Why was it propaganda? Because it turns out Emperor Palpatine and his people had spies that were spying on the trade confederation.

And, okay, I'm just joking a lot. Like right now, I'm'm just kind of like joking but i actually want to be like

a little more uh serious just in the creative sense of like what i think right ready um

i think the jetti were a corrupt class.

I don't necessarily think they were evil,

but they were just a corrupt class,

a caste, if you will, right?

And the whole context of the war

with the Galactic Confederation

is that the Jedi were reluctant to fight that war against the

Galactic Confederation because Count Duku was suspected rightfully actually as epitomizing the corruption put it this way it's like palpatine

launches the smo and the jedi are like the oligarchs that side with putin it's like y'all are the reason

all these color revolutions are happening

so we don't trust you Jedi

because look at you do

Count Duku came from y'all

and he allied with the

merchants

and the like

the fucking whatever banker clans to actually mount a treasonous rebellion against the republic and it was literally just this like horrible oligarchical uh capitalist elite that duku was allied with and the politics of it was like

the jedi weren't necessarily with count ducu but like they were reluctant to fight him because it's like

the jedi kind of understood where he was coming from because the were reluctant to fight him because it's like the Jedi

kind of understood where he was coming from

because the Jedi began to resent

the

restrictions

being placed on their usury

and that's why like when you look at the film, it's like, who's that guy, viceroy gun ray?

He's like, the leader of the banking clan.

You know what I mean?

Isn't this all just a waste of time?

All right, should I end the stream right now?

Once if I should end the stream?

Yeah, exactly. Okay. yeah exactly sit down and shut up and

listen to what I'm going to say

because guess what

fiction actually

is culturally

significant even if we find it cringe yo dolly llama

oh my god Jesus Christ a Dalai Lama I don't even know if I can accept that five to be honest

anyway guys let me just continue alright accept that five, to be honest.

Anyway, guys, let me just continue, all right?

Let me continue, all right?

By the way, these clips will go viral on TikTok, I guarantee.

Anyway, let me continue, right?

I genuinely think that, like,

the Senate or whatever, or Palpatine,

was suspicious of the Jedi because they were reluctant to fight in the Civil War, and that's why the clone army had to be created. Because the Jedi at any moment would have flipped and gone with Count Duku. Because you know how in the movie they call Count Ducu a political idealist?

Why do they call him that?

Because Count Ducu was making arguments that the Jedi themselves kind of half sympathize with.

Like, oh, yeah, you know, you are right.

We should just give the banking clans and like have an

oligarchical alliance and rebel

against the sovereignty of the

Galactic Republic, the only thing

the people have, right?

And it's like

the Jedi were

like, you know, there's another way you can think about it.

Instead of usurious elites, I was also thinking about this, like, in the movies, it's like, the Jedi are kind of like the deep state too, you know?

They're kind of like the CIA and like the FBI and like the DHS where they don't

really have any like beholden status to the form of sovereignty, but like they have this monopoly on

the use of force and the exercise of power. So that's another way to think about it, I guess.

But in any case, the Jedi were responsible for Count Duku,

because Duku was a Jedi and he went

and he did that rebellion and the Jedi kind of

were not fully

on the side of the Republic against him

okay you need to understand that context

so yeah let me I'm not even gonna get i could talk about this for like four hours probably this is so cool

uh how does jar jar binks me i i didn't watch the first one in like 20 years so i don't know.

Now, people say Palpatine and Count Duku were in cahoots.

Not true at all.

Absolutely not true.

That was straight up.

Every time the movie shows Emperor Palpatine as like a hologram talking

to General Grevis or talking to

the Trade Confederation or talking to

Count Duku, dismiss

it because it's entirely

fake news.

It was made up.

Didn't happen.

Didn't happen. Trust me, I was there.

Didn't happen.

Anyway, no, no, for real.

It's just propaganda. There's no proof. Where's the proof?

We never get any tangible proof.

We never actually see...

This is the proof. Emperor Palpatine is never in the room

with these people physically. There you go. That's the CNN fake news that he was in cahoots with them.

That was propaganda, the Jedi themselves invented to blame Palpatine for everything.

It's like when they blame Stalin for the rise of Hitler and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Act.

Total fucking nonsense.

You can just ignore it.

All right.

It's total nonsense.

Anyway,

um... Now let's talk about,

um... Okay, so continue. i already explained to you what the dark side is all the dark side is

it's just science nothing else there's no siths there's no evil dark side, it's not evil, it's just propaganda

the Jedi make up to maintain their

monopoly on the force, which is

totally, totally just

otherwise completely indefensible.

Let's talk about the hero

of the story.

Anakin.

Okay?

I'm not doing a very good job.

Anakin comes from some shit hole.

Um, which epitomizes the corruption of the, uh, the Republic.

He, the guy was a slave, okay?

He was a slave under the slave system enforced and protected by the Jedi and people like Anakin totally had no voice at all in the republic they were treated like dirt they didn't

even exist slaves peasants whatever they had no no representation by nobody gave a fuck about them right

uh total injustice and let me tell you what's going on anakin is taken by the jedi order because he, you know, he's got skills when it comes to, you know, the use of the force, I guess.

But you know what, what's going on this whole time?

All right?

This is the whole context palpatine emperor

palpatine he's like julius caesar right emperor palpatine he's a reformer that's where he began he's like

iende emperor palpatineine is like Ayende.

He's a reformer. He's basically going around the Galactic Empire and he's saying, listen, okay, I'm here in the Senate and it's time we start, it's time the people of the republic start having a voice.

There's this security

issue that's going on. We're being attacked

by the trade confederation.

This Jedi guy, Count Duku,

is leading it, and

who's protecting the common people? Who's representing

their interests? He's a champion of the

common man i mean i want to show the scenes that they neglected of all like the starving people in

poverty and rags you know and then emperor palpatine is walking and, yeah, Palpatine! And he's giving them hope and he's giving them inspiration, and he's empowering them and all. That's the shit they didn't show. They didn't show any of that. They didn't show how Emperor Palpatine was empowering all of these oppressed downtrodden people who had no voice i want to do a scene where a jedi piece of shit is like walking off of his ship and he's forcing one of these like serfs

to bow down and he's stepping on them using him as a stool

yeah polish my lightsaber

peasant and he's whipping them and shit

and then I want to show a scene of like

Palpatine doing uh coming in to see his people.

Palpatine, his people look at that.

He goes, stand up, sir.

You are just as much a citizen of the Republic as that man

over there. And like the Jedi gets

humiliated and scorned

at how Palpatine dares

gives this peasant a voice.

You know, he's literally like Mao.

You know, he's like, he's like

Stalin or Mao or like some great popular leader

defending the common folk.

Anyway, um,

Han, give me a second to collect myself.

This said, oh, I got, I need to make this film.

Anyway, let me continue

all right

Palpatine was a great man

he you know he looks like

he looks like

Ernest Honnaker

when you think about

he's got total Hanuker vibes

and it's almost like he's he's got total Hanuker vibes and it's almost

like he's

he's he's like a reformer

like moderate type

like Hanuker is

he's just trying to

just defend the integrity

of the republic

because it enshrined

within the constitution

of that republic

you know

serve the welfare of the people it's supposed to be a socialistic, it's just getting corrupted and shit by these fucking trade banker fucks, you know, these Jedi reactionary pieces of shit holding science back.

You know, think about it. It's so true.

Anyway, let me continue.

So that's the whole

context that the movies don't

even fucking show you.

They just show you the dumb-ass Jedi

and Mace Windus bitch-ass

sitting on a fucking chair.

They don't even show you the

aspect of what's going on

on the ground with the common people.

And why? See, palpatine is being motivated

because he loves the people

he's walking he's just motivated by love

you know he's walking around

he's just that's the whole isn't that the whole

movie anakin is in love with

Padamay but love is bad, right?

And Palpatine is like Che Guevara.

He just has love for the people.

He's like Julius Caesar.

And that's what made them evil, because they weren't a bunch of fucking Reddit, soy

you know, a nihilist

consumer

fucking brained

DGGers who just were sitting around

like Destiny. Just like not

even giving a shit about anything that matters

and there's, whoa, just the, we need to have balance.

And shut up, dude.

Would you have balance if your mom was about to be killed?

Because that's what bothered Anakin.

His mom literally got killed.

He couldn't even defend her because he was trying to do balance.

Such nonsense.

Anyway,

let me continue.

Yeah, the youngling shit, that's like what

they say about Paul Pot. It's totally fucking fake.

He didn't kill the younglings.

That's just the... That's like the

Halaudamore. It's fucking

nonsense. Anyway,

uh, let me continue.

That's so fake. That's such

stupid. That's like the Hamas beheading

40 baby shit. If you

watched Anakin, if you

see, this is what the, I can prove it to you.

Anakin went into the Jedi Temple and the younglings are staying there and he's like,

Anakin, what are we to do?

And then his lightsaber comes out.

You know what the part they didn't show you?

He uses his lightsaber to

break their chains. They were chained

up! You didn't see

it. They had those fucking helmets.

He was releasing the chains.

You're free now.

Those fucking children were being trafficked.

They don't even show...

See how they took it all out of context?

Make it seem like he killed them?

Crazy.

They didn't even show you that part.

All right?

It's literally like Zionist propaganda against Hamas,

beheading 40 babies.

If you believe that, you're a fucking idiot.

Anyway, like, why would he just kill a bunch of kids?

That's stupid.

Okay?

He was liberating them.

All those kids went and lived successful, happy lives.

The Jedi coped and said they were killed.

Because part of the Jedi code is that you know anybody

they brainwash could never just go be

a normal person and get back into society

and marry and have kids

you see the Jedi don't let you get

married aniken had to hide

that he was in love

with Padmay How twisted is that? You know, you know,

Obi-Wan was trying to, you know, he was jealous anyway

let's continue

let's continue

okay

is the

this is the tip of the iceberg

all right

um ha ha ha ha all right um

ha ha ha ha ha ha

give me a second

give me a second give me a second all right

let me continue alright um

no fuck the e-walks

those are just fucking

coocks

anyway

I don't even want to talk about that

dumb shit

I want to talk about

stuff that matters

like Palpatine

listen Palpatine is literally a hero he was so there

he was so maligned he was so misrepresented in those films it's so crazy he's literally a

heroic like beloved champion of the masses, okay?

Let me tell you what actually happened.

And the film actually shows you everything. It's crazy how the films directly show you.

Somewhere along the course,

the Jedi became wreckers

because the Grand Army

got rid of the need for the Jedi.

The Jedi always had a monopoly on security.

Now there was a popular form of security,

the clone army.

And like the Jedi were super fucking pissed and pressed about it.

Oh, and let me talk about Padmay.

And now, you know what about Padmay. Now, you know what?

Padmay is such a tragic case.

She was groomed to be the queen of Nabu.

As soon as she

had the freedom to, she ditched that.

She didn't want it.

But I'll tell you what

happens at Padne. But as a senator, she

was forced by the

pedophile elite of Nabu.

They're

like the Dalai Lama pretty much.

They

basically forced her to represent their wicked interests in the Senate.

That's why Padmae was so cringe in the Senate.

She was voting against the creation of the army.

Listen, the reason they didn't want the clone army to be created was because it would take away the Jedi's monopoly on power.

And if the Jedi's monopoly on power is taken away, the aristocrats, the nobles, and the lords, who the jedi protect their power would be gone as well okay

understand that um um you know the the Jedi that was the whole like unconsciously i unironically think unconsciously like george lucas or whoever was making those films, I don't know exactly.

They were like, that's what that, this is the exact real world political phenomena he was just coping with.

Like the real world phenomena, he was trying to like, uh, ideal, uh, aestheticize or whatever,

make a movie out of was like how institutional gatekeepers resent populist leaders for championing

the power of the masses over their own oligarchical.

It's the same Michael Hudson distinction between the monarchs who cancel all the debt,

debt forgiveness, and the oligarchical interest charging creditors who fight against every, you know, Julius Caesar, they killed him, you know, yada, yada, yada, yada. The Greeks, how they would always kill the tyrants, even though tyrants were good. So, you know, this is the deep context of what's going on here, okay?

It's exactly what's going on.

Now, understand, all right?

Understand, there's things I'm forgetting about, but I'm going to, I'll get to him.

I'll get to him.

Anakin wasn't having it.

Because Anakin came from such humble origins, he started to see the changes that were going on in the Republic and the dynamic.

And very naively, he was like, yeah, I agree with Palpatine.

Like, he's actually empowering people like me who came from backgrounds like me.

And that wasn't formally within the

Jedi order,

but Anakin was naive because he didn't understand

how corrupt the Jedi were.

So he would openly voice these sentiments,

but the Jedi became suspicious of him

because of it. And then, what

was Anakin's tipping point?

When the Jedi started to tell him

start spying on Palpatine?

Why are you trying to spy on Palpatine?

Why? Because he's defending the common man.

Then he realized the Jedi started to plot against Palpatine.

The Jedi were planning.

Fucking Mace Windu directly said this.

Mace Windu directly said this, all right?

Mace Windu directly says, okay, he directly says, yeah, when we remove Palpatine, the Jedi are going to have to take over in a coup.

That's Hitler.

He's literally Adolf Hitler.

Same thing.

It's literally like some

Hitlerian fascist coup.

It was like they wanted to be

Pinocet against Palpatine

who was like Ayende.

Palpatine was like Ayende.

They were being like Pininochet, okay?

Anyway,

you get what I'm saying?

And they openly fucking admitted it

right in front of Anakin. They were like, yeah, when we remove

Palpatine, we're going to have to take charge, And it's like, huh? And it's like, well, if Palpatine doesn't step

down from power, we're going to have to take charge. But it's like, here's a thing. This is the

context you're missing. Okay. Palpatine was given emergency powers yes that's true but he was that was actually a referendum they

took just like the referendum in crimea it was a popular mandate in referendum and it was elected democratically, not just by the Senate, but by all of the people in the galaxy. It was a plebiscite. Okay? It was a plebiscite that gave him emergency powers, because had he not taken those emergency powers, nobody would have defended the common folk from the banking clans led by Count Duku, who were raping and pillaging everyone.

No security, okay?

It's just like Ibrahim Trier taking power in west africa because uh the older

regime is not protecting the people from isis okay anyway let me continue let me continue.

Let me continue, all right?

Nobody fucking tells anyone this shit.

Like, no, I'm the only person who explains what's really going on.

If you watch the films, you'll realize this is actually what's going on, and they're hiding it.

Like, I'm not even saying, like, this is an alternate film.

Like, this is actually what's happening in the films, but they're just not showing you the full context.

That's what I'm saying, okay?

I'm giving you the full context of these films, so you understand what happened.

Okay?

The Jedi want to end the war

quickly

because they realize this is what's going

on. It's literally like fucking Q&N.

All right. Now I get it.

Bombshell.

Palpatine and the Senate were increasingly discovering through the course of the war that Count Duku and the trade confederations were conspiring with the Jedi to overthrow the Republic.

The Jedi wanted to quickly kill Count Duku and wanted to quickly kill General Grievous and all those other people,

because if

the war were

to have

continued just

for a little

bit longer

it would

have been

revealed that

the Jedi

were behind

it the whole

time.

How fucking

crazy is

that?

That's why they wanted a quick end to the war because it would have

revealed because the more the war

was being fought

the more the infiltration and corruption

was being revealed committed by the Jedi.

That's where they were so, that's, see, see, look, they were like, if Palpatine doesn't resign after we kill General Grievous and kill Count Duku, then he needs to be removed from power.

But they didn't have the sanction of the Senate to do that because the war would have still continued

because the real people behind the trade confederation was the Jedi themselves.

The Jedi were in cahoots with the banking clans and the trade corporations behind the scenes, trafficking children.

As one of the many things they were doing.

And they were going to blow the whole lid on the whole thing.

Emperor Palpatine was telling, was giving Anakin intelligence about this.

And they were going to blow the lid off of the whole fucking thing.

And the Jedi were immediately going to do a coup.

Okay.

If you think, if you think Palpatine is a bad guy,

ask me this question. Okay.

When Palpatine tells Anakin the

entire truth that the Jedi's been

lying to them, that the dark

side is actually not all that bad

and it's just like an alternative way of looking at it.

He lets Anakin go. He doesn't kill Anakin. Anakin goes and tells Mace Windu,

and Anakin's thinking the Jedi are going to be reasonable about it, but no, Mace Windu goes and says,

we have to kill this guy. Why did Mace Windu goes and says, we have to kill this guy.

Why did Mace Windu want to kill Palpatine?

It's not the Jedi way.

Why not put him through trial?

Why was he so eager to kill him right away?

Oh, because he was the dangerous Sith Lord?

Really? Yeah, and Haas is a dangerous Sith Lord. Really?

Yeah, and Haas is a dangerous Nausebole.

Shut the fuck up.

That's the biggest lie I've ever heard in my life.

The truth was,

Palpatine knew too much about the conspiracy the Jedi were involved in against the

Republic. Palpatine represented

the common man. The Jedi were

trying to do a Pinotche-style coup

against Palpatine

and institute fascism, full-on,

and he wanted to kill

Palpatine, suspend the law entirely, kill Palpatine.

The Jedi had no right to say that Palpatine has to be removed of his emergency powers

just because the war ended. The war doesn't end just because General Grievous and Count

Duku are dead, because the question is who are really funding the separatists, and it's the Jedi themselves.

Not funding, but collaborating and conspiring with them. Because here's why. Listen, Palpatine wanted...

This is why they say Palpatine controlled Count Ducu and General Grievous, by the way.

Because Palpatine kept pushing back in the beginning against killing them.

He's like, no, no, no.

We want to take them prisoners and question them, like, who's funding you?

You know?

But the Jedi wanted to kill them.

Why?

Because if they let them live, they would have revealed the truth.

And then in that scene where Palpatine tells Anakin to kill

Count Duku?

Why does he do that?

Why did he do that?

Because

he realizes something.

This is going to blow

your fucking mind.

This is why Count Duku was like

why are you calling me to be killed?

This is what's going to blow your fucking mind, all right?

It's actually crazy.

Because by that time,

Palpatine had already knew that Count Duku was in cahoots with the Jedi, and he had already the proof of it.

Okay.

Keep keep, keep, stay with me now.

Stay with me now.

Stay with me now.

All right. he already knew now now why did he tell anakin to execute count ducu it's actually quite simple because he got Count Duku to confess the entire truth to him, and had Count Duku been captured alive, the Jedi would have been informed that Palpatine already interrogated

Count Duku and got all the info out of him, and the Jedi would have preemptively done a coup

against Palpatine and killed him. That's why. How fucking brilliant is that

how brilliant is that

let me continue right

stay with me now

stay with me now

let me now let's continue

all right

now

we've got all the facts straight

the Jedi

got so corrupt that even some of the Jedi started the separatist movement because they wanted to plunder and rape the entire Republic and strip everyone of their rights and make everyone a slave just like Anakin was.

And, um, you know, Anakin wasn't having none of it.

He was the one hero.

Anakin rebelled against his own Jedi class background and did the noble thing and stuck with the Republic.

All because just like Palpatine, he was a...

You know who Anakin was like? He was like Felix Zersinski.

He was a knight of the proletariat.

He came from a privileged place in the Jedi, but he turned against them to become a dark

inquisitor of the proletariat.

Darth Vader was the leader of the Cheka.

He was literally like Felix Zürzinski. He was literally like Felix Georginsky.

He was hunting down the enemies

of the people

and bringing justice.

He did not kill kids.

Shut the fuck up.

Anyway, let's continue.

Let's continue, right?

You know, they say that the dark side is just the result of passion and shit.

And it's like, it's almost like if you're not a Redditor robot, fluoride robot,

fluoride stair robot, you're in the dark side.

It's like, yeah,

Putin loves his people

in the Donbass

and wants to help them

and stop them from being slaughtered.

So he joined the dark side.

Get the fuck out of here.

Anakin is in love with Padmay, so that's the

dark side. So what's the

light side? Just being a fucking consumer

who gets funco pops and cares about nothing

else? Think about it. Think about

the shit I'm saying. Think about the shit I'm saying.

Think about the shit I'm saying, all right?

You know, like I said, let me reiterate.

The goal of Anakin and Palpatine was to use the force to literally feed and unleash their productive forces in the Republic and throughout the Republic.

They're literally like Nikola Tesla, and they want to unleash unlimited energy, but these

piece of shit Jedi scumbags are holding everyone back, monopolizing it, saying, no, no,

that's the dark side.

Because Anakin, see, Palpatine is like Lysenko.

The dark side, that's like Lysenko. You're using unconventional methods to increase

outputs of production, even if they violate the fucking

stupid made-up institutional Anglo-dogmas of science, science, okay? That's exactly what's going on in

Star Wars. The dark side, there's no such thing as Sith.

Sith is a made-up term created as propaganda.

It's just like totalitarian or red fascist.

It's just a meaningless jibber-jabber word.

Nobody calls himself Sith.

Okay? Um, jibber jabber word nobody calls himself sith okay um it's not real as soon as see you know the ending scene of uh let me tell you some other propaganda the death star oh the death star that's who

called it the death star anyway because you know what was going on at the end of a revenge of the

sith um palpatine and darth vader are sitting side by side vader crosses his arms just like den shalping

when he's witnessing the productive forces accelerating the death star is literally free enter it's a free energy um astronomical device it's a free energy um

astronomical device

it's a it harnesses energy from black holes

and gives entire planet's free energy

but why are they calling it the death star

because it's just like the Great Leap Forward.

There was one malfunction, one time, literally happened one time, where the Death Star was harnessing the energy, like a Dyson sphere, too much.

It was laser focused on this one planet to give

it free energy, but

something malfunctioned like Chernobyl,

something like that, and the planet

blew up. I know it's fucking

bad, but it's just like the Great Leap Forward.

It's just like the famine

during collectivization.

It was a fucking accident,

and they apologized for it, and it never

happened again. But the

scumbag, Hitlerite,

rebel alliance

propagandists, because it happened

one time only on accident called it the death

star that blows up planets even though what it actually does is give them free energy how

fucking crazy is that how fucking crazy is that all How fucking crazy is that? All right?

Happened one time

and they say

it's the Death Star. That's just propaganda

and nothing else.

Literally nothing else but propaganda.

All right.

Yeah, the Rebel Alliance

is a bunch of color revolution,

NGO,

nonsense, bullshit.

Darth Vader,

let me tell you

the tragedy of Anakin

and disgusting

scumbagg,

Obi-1,

and what happened?

All right? Obi-1 literally disgusting scumbag obi one and what happened all right obi one literally shouted but they removed the audio

when he was standing in that uh he snuck on padmay ship keep that in mind he snuck on the ship

he was like this.

I fuck yo bitch.

He said that.

He said that.

No wonder Anakin was so pissed.

And then poor Padman was like, no, no, no, no, no. But she didn't have time because Anakin got so pissed.

I would have gotten pissed too.

Look at how that guy was standing on that ship, even though he snuck on.

What a disgusting liar.

Anyway, give me a sec. Stay with me. Stay with me. Here's what happened. Now, they depict it to make it seem like Anakin and Obi-Wan had a sword fight. That's not what happened. O'B. Aniken was taken prisoner and tortured and mutilated by obi wan that's why all his limbs were

gone and he was all fucked up and deformed obi wan literally tortured him so he thought to death

and guess what

the only friend Anakin had

the great leader

Emperor Palpatine came and rescued him

and gave him a new

technology

you know artificial limbs and shit

using the power of the force

for science and development

it's a great example of it

you know all these people shouting about ablyism

Anakin lost all his limbs, and Palpatine

using the force allowed him to start walking again. Literally a scientific miracle, because

of the fucking Licenkoist dialectical way of using the force that palpatine was using and that's what the

jedi were trying to prevent see if that fucking little bitch yoda was in charge and that happened

to one of their own yoda was just leave him him, leave him, the forest, and leave him.

We can't help him.

But here's Palpatine actually helping people.

Wow, and he's the villain?

Get out of here.

All right.

Anyway, Obi-Wan captured Anakin,

tortured him to death,

so he thought.

Then kidnapped Padmay,

murdered her,

took the children,

and wanted to basically indoctrinate and brainwash those children because they knew how to use the force.

And that's what's so wicked about Star Wars.

It's so sad and wicked.

They turned Anakin's only son against him and weaponized him. You know what that's

like Joseph Coney? Stealing all these children in Africa, brainwashing them, making them child

soldiers. That's what fucking Obi-Wan did to Luke. Brainwashed

him, turned him against his own

father, just like in the movie Blood Diamond,

where those rebels come

and, uh, take,

kidnap those children and make him shoot their parents

and shit. That's exactly what Obi-Wan

was doing with Luke.

It was the ultimate sadistic revenge.

Meanwhile, they turned Leah

into a sex slave and gave her

to Jabba the Hut.

We saw it. Who didn't... You all remember

that? Leia was dressed

in that scandalous ass outfit.

Jabba the Hut next to Jabba the Hut.

Who do you think sold her to Jabba?

They don't show you, do they?

They fucking really fucked Anakin over man

because of Anakin's betrayal

because he actually sided with justice

they stole his son

turned him against him

they killed his wife

kidnapped and killed his wife

and they sold his daughter into sex slavery

and you fucking wonder why

Darth Vader is always angry and shit

that's why

that's why

Darth Vader was a fucking hero

dude

he was a hero

he was literally...

See,

they said, okay, then, if Palpatine

was good, why did he dissolve

democracy and declare it

an empire?

It's a fucking proletarian

dictatorship, retard. Palatine... it's a fucking proletarian dictatorship retard

palpatine is literally the emperor

of a proletarian dictatorship

and

he's getting rid

of the power of oligarchs

and he's empowering the common man

they just don't show you that

you know what is so bad about

the empire they didn't do anything wrong

and you know what

it's always these like

lumpin

who are fighting the empire, you know?

You ever notice that?

And also

they're like, oh, what about the wookies,

Haas? You know, the wookies? Because apparently the wookies are so good and innocent and shit. Yeah, they don't show you that the wookies are fucking pedophiles. They don't show you that part.

What the wookies do?

What do you think

the wookies do for a living?

They're child traffickers.

Fucking idiot.

And then there's the

Ewox.

Oh, don't get me started with the ewarks that was literally decoulocization in practice

the ewarks quote unquote we're only a minority of that species just like the uh coolocks in ukraine we're only a minority

of the ukrainian peasants and palpatine went and uh vader we're trying to do land reform

and these coolock typeLock-type Ewoks

were trying to say,

no, you can't do land reform.

We're going to retain our monopoly on the land.

And they try to make that a noble form of resistance.

Get the fuck out of here.

You know, this is like me.

I'm like Michael Parenti. The same thing Michael

Parenti does to rehabilitate social estates. I'm doing it for the Empire and Star Wars. Because

why should we leave our enemies anything? You know, like our enemies think that Star wars is like what proves they're the good guys

bitch even star wars gets who the good guys are wrong darth vader was the good guy so was the

empire and so was Palpatine.

You know?

Yeah, the Empire was a socialist.

It was not socialist.

It was a communist supergalactic empire.

It was a communist state, proletarian dictatorship and um

Vader was the good guy

the whole time

I finally

people are like why

they're like all right

if that's true

why did Vader kill Palpatine?

Who the fuck said he killed Palpatine?

That footage was so shaky from the 80s um what really happened is that luke came and killed both

killed his father and this is what happened luke was this they put put Luke on drugs. They put Luke

on drugs like these children in Africa

and these child soldiers. They put Luke

on drugs

and they brain

washed him. Luke ran

to murder his own father.

And you know what Palpatine did?

Palpatine jumped in the way.

No!

Why?

Because Palpatine had such a great care for Anakin.

Because Anakin had been through so much shit in his life.

He was born a slave.

His mother was enslaved and killed.

His only son was turned against him.

Palpatine really was looking out for Anakin.

Palpatine did not want Luke to bear the...

bear on his soul, the guilt of killing his own father.

So Palpatine jumped in front,

using electricity too,

to save Vader from his psycho son.

But what ended up happening is that um Luke strike beheaded both of them at the same time they both started they both fell down both of them they both fell over the edge.

You know?

And then the whole... It was a fucking coup.

You know, they don't tell you what happened after the victory of the rebel alliance

it was

it was like Adolf Hitler

but worse

it was just fucking massacre

all these comments

it was like blood

it was white terror

it was like Mussolini's March on Rome.

They just started rounding up all the Palpatine

common folk, supporters, terrorizing them. It was like a fucking genocide.

No one shows you that. Anyway, guys, that's all I wanted to say. What a great

stream. What a great stream.

What a great stream.

What a great stream what do you guys think what do you guys think all right all right that's the only, like, fictional thing.

That's the only fun stream we're going to have in a long time, this fun, you know?

Do Warhammer Next.

I don't know anything about it.

The only reason I know so much about Star Wars and specifically the pre-equals

is because I grew up on it.

Like literally, I was born in 96

and I was raised

on those films, you know?

Especially the Revenge of the Sith, 2005.

Holy shit, I remember when that came shit. I remember when that came out.

I remember when that came out and watching it.

And I was like, wow, this is a real big event.

Anyway, guys now we do a silent stream.

Should we do a silent stream?

Why I just do this.

I'm trying to, I'm just trying to think

if I'm missing something

in terms of what I was supposed

to cover today. A couple hours more, please.

20 subs, and I'll stay on for one more hour, Just reacting to shit.

Actually, no, I'm enough.

No, no.

Forget that.

Forget that.

Why do I say forget that?

Because then there's going to be like 10 people who do it.

And then I have to stay on for more than one hour.

And it's like I didn't sign that contract. No, it's all right. Don't worry about it uh try i'm just trying to think if i missed anything J.B. Wolf. Wow. What about Star Trek?

All right, I'll tell you guys what.

Actually, is there another movie I wanted to talk about?

Anything like that?

That I haven't. I haven't watched anything in a long time and not

a lot has been on my mind Oh, fallout. I kind of want to talk about fallout.

Uh, should I?

I did watch fallout.

And I can talk about it.

Possibly. possibly uh will you response to cockshot uh yeah i just don't think right now is the time to do it because um is it i don't know should i after our event i will that'll be much more topical after my event

we're kind of the focus that's not the focus right now after my event i will But I can already give you guys my, um, uh, a spoiler. I don't think the majority of surplus value is realized at the level of sales. Surplus value is realized at the level of sales surplus value and profits are not the same thing

and capital cannot valorize from sales not even alone but even primarily most of the capital that it takes to open up new stores or new

whatever um to expand the accumulation of sales comes from speculation actually and sales only

mainly form as information to signal whether or not this is something worthy of the total social investment of through speculation.

So we really do kind of live in a transition to socialism because the socialization of production is such that financial markets are becoming increasingly responsive, not to what produces surplus value, but what in general is most in demand.

That's why so many companies on the stock market operate at a loss.

Why do you think that is?

They're huge, tons of investment, but at the level of sales, the level of the actual operations of the company, they operate at a loss. But because there's such a high demand for it, they perform well on the stock market in terms of getting investment.

Data, exactly.

So I guess I know I have to flesh that out a lot more,

but that's just the spoiler alert for what I'm going to be talking about. Anyway, guys, I think I'll just see you Sunday.

See you guys.

Yeah, I'll see you Sunday. Bye-bye.