🔴 RED NEWS | WW3 STARTING!!!!! | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES

I can't, I can't.

That version is so terrible.

It's the first time you're hearing it because that song, any version of that song, Midwest, thank you, any version of that song, you go.

I wanna know what love is

I want you to show me.

Like, you gotta have that part.

And they didn't have it because they're a bunch of fucking artsy fartsy losers from Slovenia because they're above that.

They're above good melody, because they're fuck Leibach, you know?

I've been giving them a pass for too long, and I'm done with them.

That was my final straw.

Run the Maya house.

Welcome, cult members, to the infrared broadcast.

Um.

Welcome, cult members.

Welcome, cult.

We are here congregated now in the forest with our dark, you know.

I don't know what cults do these days.

Um and in any case, uh we are here now.

The cult is here.

This is a cult.

And um I'm mentioning that this is a cult because a lot a lot of people seem to forget sometimes the cult that is infrared.

By the way, I'm not talking about the party, I'm talking about infrared.

This is a cult.

I'm gonna explain the cult a little bit.

Um, specifically as it regards one of the um

One of the high ranking cult members

Jackson, you know?

And some people, some people just forget that this is a cult and they decide to air their opinions on Jackson's tweets about Andrew Tate.

Andrew, Jackson made a tweet saying he endorsed Andrew Tate for prime minister.

And the cult just forgot for some reason.

I don't understand it.

That this is a cult and that

Like, you what are you doing, you know?

What are you fucking sh expressing an opinion?

Anyway, uh, no, in all seriousness, uh, what do I mean by this?

Do you guys want to know the crime you're committing when you are chiming in and making criticisms of Jackson's tweets?

Is it that you are breaking our unity?

Well, not necessarily.

Is it that you are going against one of the leaders of our movement?

No, not really.

Is it that you're counter-signaling us, bro?

Well, that's imprecise, not really.

What is the real issue with it from the infrared perspective?

Uh, party-wise, that's a totally different discussion, which I'm not gonna have right now.

I'm gonna express views that reflect my views only.

Well, it could reflect the views of others as well, but I'm like, I'm not making this official.

Like, you have to agree or something.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Well, if you're in infrared, you have to agree, because this is a cult and everyone is here by force.

Um

What is the real problem with it?

And and one could say it is a distraction, but w how do we become more precise about this?

What is the real issue with it, right?

From the infrared perspective, that beginning in twenty twenty one, when infrared launched, when this cult, so to speak, started

It's that you you are partaking in discourse.

That's the problem.

You are partaking in discourse in such a way that you

That

that demonstrates an agnosticism with respect

to the ends and conclusion of discourse.

And that is the sin you're committing.

Agnosticism.

Agnosticism with respect to the fact

That discourse is finished.

It's over.

Discourse has been completed.

You're not on Twitter.

Twitter is not a forum of dialogue where people are sharing their takes and they're comparing and contrasting them.

And from there, a conclusion is arrived.

And no, no, no, the conclusion, the conclusion, my friends, of all discourse on the internet, the way in which human beings are recognized online through social media, measured in engagement, and all of that is already completed.

It's over.

And you are committing a stupid mistake by thinking that it isn't over, or at worst, by recognizing that it's over, but being agnostic about the ends of what this all is, what all of this discourse actually ends in.

I am very confident in what the discourse ends in.

The discourse ends, and I'm not saying that the discourse builds up to this conclusion through discourse.

I'm saying.

That discourse

already has as its object, right?

Fulfillment.

Fulfillment in what?

Fulfillment in the universal and homogeneous state.

Fulfillment in the universal empire, right?

Fulfillment in the party.

Right?

Fulfillment in the impersonal and collective.

form of a united common existence.

A universal empire that already recognizes all mankind.

That is mercy and justice.

Mercy, justice and cruelty.

For that matter.

To all mankind.

It's all already finished.

Why are you partaking in discourse that's already done?

And if the discourse is done, then we have to be clear about what our

Place in social media actually is.

It's not to have a dialogue, it's not to participate in discourse.

It is to more or less rig the game and rig the discourse in a direction

of revelation, right?

Rigging the discourse in such a way that it creates openings that reveals to people, that reveals to people the fact that the discourse is over.

Frankly, that's always the message I've carried with me since the very beginning when I first hit the live button and decided that all of these grand plans that I had to somehow influence reality

All of these big plans I had, because I fundamentally understood the fact that this medium, the internet and social media,

is not an authentic way of communicating with people in their innermost real existence and that something is fundamentally lost in communication.

and that the ability to recognize people through this medium is just not possible.

Because again, we all find satisfaction with respect to our desire for recognition

In the universal empire or the universal state or the Communist Party.

But something compelled me to just say fuck it and hit live and just talk to you directly, whoever you may so fucking be.

Saints, sinners, scum

And nobles alike.

You know, upstanding people, um, downstanding people.

Evil, evil scum and very, very good people.

The Faithful and the Disbelievers.

You know?

people with profound moral integrity and people with none human beings and demons and monsters alike.

And trust me, I've had my fair share of those I've had my fair share of those in these long four years.

Be certain of that.

I uh

I decided to talk to everyone to whom it may concern and give you that chance.

And I had written all of you off.

I with I didn't know who you were, but all of you I had written off preemptively for years.

I said, You're not worth it.

You're a lost cause because E, this is the devil's playground, more or less, you know?

Social media.

The whole fucking game is rigged.

People's perceptions and their consciousness is so rigged that the only way you could get through to people somehow is just sitting and waiting for

them to eventually wake up and realize the truth.

And that was the only thing you could really do.

But I decided no.

No, I'm gonna

I'm going to talk to everyone equally.

All twenty people.

Um.

When I say talk to everyone, I mean, like, open up the possibility that literally anyone could could hear this message, you know?

Hear the message.

And the message was what?

The message was that.

You know?

The discourse is over.

That's always been the message of infrared, in a way.

Socialism is already here because China is a socialist country, and we are entering a Chinese era of world history.

And we're entering an era of multipolarity in the post-COVID world, and it's done, it's over.

Your tired, tired, vain attempt to discover through discourse what generations before you had already not only discovered but accomplished these plans you have, these struggles you have to articulate the correct position on the internet.

or anywhere else for that matter,

were already finished fifty years ago.

And it's all been happening.

China has had a plan, and that plan has been working.

It's been coming into fruition quite well.

And everything you think you have thought about and argued about, whatever I really mean this not only in an abstract mumbo jumbo sense, which is what this sounds like to most of you probably, but

In a really simple way.

All of these debates and discussions leftists have, all of these.

Forms of discourse that they partake in.

It was settled a century ago, probably longer.

One of the most profound revelations you get as a Marxist

Is that actually, yeah, Marx did think of that.

Because not Marx, but you know, Kant and a whole generation of of philosophers, they had already thought about all of that shit.

And they did think about it and they did successfully resolve it.

And Marx did not cut off.

That that that

Um

accumulated tradition that was before him.

Marx did not undo that.

You know, he was that was the foundation upon which he rested through Hegel's totalizing and complete system of the entire history of Western philosophy and history, right?

History in general.

And Marx preserved that integral totality.

So, yes, motherfucker, they did think of that shit.

Okay?

And not just Marx and Engels, but Lenin.

Yeah, they thought about it.

And to make matters worse, not just Lenin, but Soviet civilization.

Okay?

You're a bunch of idiot 15-year-olds on Twitter.

Not you, the gorillas, but in general, leftists.

Or stupid dipshit grad students, and you're bickering, you're trying to learn and whatever.

But there was an entire Soviet civilization, just in the 20s and 30s alone, with millions and millions of people who were institutionally embedded in Marxism.

And yes, they had debates and discussions, and they talked about all this shit.

Okay, everything you could possibly talk about on Twitter that you think you're talking about, they talked about it and they resolved it and came to a conclusion.

At least understand they came to a conclusion that was reflected historically, right?

But to make matters worse, to put a hold that the Soviet Union didn't end until 1991 and that there was the 40s, the 50s, the 60s, and 70s, China, okay?

The debates and discussions that happened during the Cultural Revolution alone.

Among Chinese Marxists, every possible fucking thing you can think of they debated about and they discussed and they thought about and they talked about.

Every fucking thing that people argue about, they already did.

And they came to a conclusion a long time ago.

And

Somehow

We are living in this false modernity.

Modernity, by the way, means now-ness, right?

A false now-ness, a false modernity, where we think it hasn't been resolved yet.

We are still me, I'm gonna go on Twitter and, well, no one knows.

We're all agnostic, we're trying to resolve it.

No, it was resolved before.

And not only was it resolved, it was implemented.

As a

500 year plan

A

A JOURNEY ACROSS THE STARS

With an exact coordinate.

Exact location put into the navigation drive.

And we are slowly, slowly drifting in that direction.

And that was decided a long time ago.

And here we are debating and discussing about where we should be going or if we should go in the first place.

And meanwhile, meanwhile, we're living in the three body problem.

Already, and we are the Tri-Solarians, and we're already embarking upon our journey across the stars.

By the way,

The journey across the stars, it's socialism with Chinese characteristics.

It's the wandering earth.

Searching for its new son.

And we're already on that journey.

And we think we are somehow exercising discretion and control.

And we are negotiating the terms and conditions under which this journey is going to take place.

And we feel like that our discourse, that our participation within discourse gives us power and authority to negotiate and talk and decide these outcomes.

But the outcome has already fucking been decided before we ever fucking uttered a single word.

And that, my friends.

Is the mistake?

of criticizing Jackson Hinkles tweets.

Before you said a thing, the outcome was already decided.

You're not changing the outcome.

Of what of what he's actually doing, of what the end goal of what he's doing is, that was decided and set long ago.

Understand there is a plan, and there has always been a plan.

And yes, people have thought about it.

And the goal is not to talk to you in real time.

in a dialogue or a discourse, but through brute force, hijack modernity itself in the direction and in a way that is conducive

To the supremacy not only of the Communist Party.

But of not only the American, but the international working class.

Yeah.

Uh

Let me calm down.

Marxism-Leninism is not a discourse.

For Marxism-Leninism to be a discourse

It assumes

That the object of our language and our discourse somehow will come to fruition through the process of discussion.

But the object

Of Marxism-Leninism is history itself, and that history.

Predates our participation within discourse.

It predates it.

Emilo with the ten!

It predates that.

It predates that.

Before you were even fucking born, the Chinese had already mapped out and planned and thought through fully how communism is going to conquer this planet.

Before you even

Were a before you were even inserted into your mother's womb.

This plan was in motion.

Before the Chinese were that matter.

Because the victory of socialism and the victory of the proletariat was already decided by history itself, and it is an outcome

That will be realized independently, independently of your participation within discourse.

By the time you decide to have something to say on Twitter.

The outcome was already predetermined and decided.

So, who are you fooling?

You are not a sovereign individual.

Participating in discourse.

That's the mistake you're making.

It's not that I hate discourse.

The most beautiful object of discourse, I think, is the Holy Quran.

That is a book of discourse, it's a book of poetry, it's a book of language, of logos.

arising from the real.

And I'm sure the same well, I'm not sure, the same is true, I will assert, for the Bible and other holy books.

What I find to be vain and what I reject

is the participation, the illusion that we can somehow participate within discourse, that our use of language allows us to define the content of the object.

And it doesn't.

It's already something that's been decided before we ever uttered a fucking word.

So what is the point in talking?

That's a very, very good question.

That question

Of why the fuck you should even say anything at all is

One of the questions that were the driving forces behind why I basically took I didn't talk at all and I isolated myself from society and I didn't say a fucking word for years, for years, guys, for years, because I didn't even understand what the fuck the point in saying anything even was anymore.

When everything was already set,

But

But what allowed me to rediscover the point of using words?

Well,

Although the outcome is already determined.

The longer human beings

The longer they are prolonged from realizing this fact, from realizing that.

That the outcome of discourse has been decided

The longer that they suffer, the longer that they find themselves in cycles of

Suffering and

Um confusion and despair.

And not content with life-killing despair and suffering that just allows people, I guess, to wither away.

It leads them to take drastic actions, drastic actions against other human beings, cannibalism.

Um violence.

Uh not divine violence, as Benjamin would put it, but petty violence, you know, savagery, destruction.

Destroying things for no good fucking reason actually.

No good fucking reason.

Destroying things that you have no fucking right to destroy.

You know?

No fucking right.

Like what?

The destruction of your subjective integrity gives you the fucking right to destroy history and the accumulation of history and what?

The accumulation of generations of wisdom and tradition, you can just fucking destroy all of it because you don't fucking get it right now and you're fucking hurting right now?

And that was just a source of rage inside of me, just a source of rage and rage, because I could see that the United States.

Was assuming that position on a global level, just destroying entire fucking nations and attempting to fucking destroy more Russia and China, and trying to undo everything China had fucking built for decades and decades, and doing everything they can to just tear apart the accumulation of people's cultural and historical traditions and telling them that they're fucking wrong and backward.

Even this shoe, this shit has worked for generations and generations, but just because you don't fucking get it, all of it should just be destroyed and families should be fucking eviscerated, and people's ability to fucking make sense of the world should what?

All liquidated, liquidate everything, you know, just because of your fucking inability to get it, liquidate fucking everything, right?

And that's the position of the Atlanticist world hegemony.

You know, it was profoundly destructive with respect to humanity.

And this rage

This rage

Is what compelled me to start speaking.

And what was the thing that I said that condemned me from the very beginning?

And when I say condemned me, it sealed my fate.

As in, I would be ostracized from society.

There is nothing I could possibly do to prevent character assassination and being maligned and totally just crushed and killed in terms of my reputation and whatever.

What did I insist upon saying?

What did I insist upon saying?

What was this word?

What was this thing I was saying?

Well,

I acquired the courage to say something very simple, and this is what inspired me to speak.

No, it doesn't have to fucking be that way.

You know?

Like, no, actually, that's not the fucking logical conclusion.

That has to be drawn necessarily.

You know?

Like actually fucking no.

You don't fucking have to do that to preserve

The integrity of meaning itself.

You can show some good fucking faith, you know?

And when I say good faith, I mean, I mean, remember the shit that I used to get angry about, like definitions and shit?

It's like, no, you don't fucking need to reduce a word to this limited fucking box that is just this finite understanding you have now immediately, right?

Now.

You can't reduce you can't reduce it to something because that would abstract it from the integral, you know, totality of associations, unconscious and so on and so on, that it has.

The subtlety, the richness, the depth of its meaning.

And

This

You know, was um

This is the shit I started saying from the very beginning, you know?

Um.

That

That we are living in a false modernity.

Again, modernity means what?

Nowness.

It's a false modernity.

It's not a real nowness, a real nouness.

is truly now not

Not a farcical repetition of the past, but a real now, right?

When you participate in discourse, you are partaking in false modernity.

False nounness

False noun is when in fact

The outcome

of your activity actually is in the past.

Not the now, but in the past.

And where is the opening of the now, the real modernity?

That has always been the goal of Infrared.

Real nowness.

Real nowness.

I gave history its proper due.

Marxism, Leninism in the age of multi-polarity and the post COVID world.

Socialism with Chinese characteristics and Xi Jinping thought.

And that is where we are up to now.

That is where we are so far.

And here we are now.

And thinking about the now and considering the now, the true modern, the true modernity, the true nowness, from the very beginning inspired me with dreams and visions,

When I say dreams and visions, I'm not saying from some otherworldly power.

I'm saying

Visions that were a consequence of contemplating, profoundly contemplating, the meaning of what now means.

on the basis of giving history its proper credit and due.

My first infrared vision

Was CPUSA 2036?

And I thought about that.

I thought about the now being this fundamental confrontation within America, you know.

That multipolarity, and by multipolarity, I had a very specific understanding of, you know.

Universal empires in the Kojev sense, you know, China, Russia and so on.

And the end of American led unipolar modernity, unipolar world order.

And um

I thought I couldn't shake off.

It wasn't a rational thought, a procedure of logic or thought that made me arrive at the CPUSA thing.

It was such an intuitive, very much a vision.

Yes, I'm not gonna cut it.

I'm not gonna lie to you and like say it was something else.

It was a vision.

As a materialist, how was I able to have that vision?

It's not because of magic, it's because, again, I gave history its proper due so I could actually have a clarity with respect to what is actually now, right?

And that

And that to me was

This confrontation

between the American state tradition

and the Communist Party.

And it made so much sense to me.

It made so much fucking sense to me.

Because I understood very well.

Something about

The Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China and every other Communist State in the twentieth century

Which is that

Their modernity was Americanism.

And in this sense Curtis Yarvin was right, communism is as American as apple pie.

They

already had America.

They already had a universal state, a united state, you know universal state where everyone is fundamentally equal before the law.

And um

And everybody is more or less um and nobody cares about your your race or whatever, none of that matters.

It's just the universal form of law and state, you know, and that is America.

That's what America is, that's the dream of the American Republic, which

Which dwells in

in this ambiguity between this completely formalistic, rigid abstraction and all of the sublime might and brilliance and beauty of the Asiatic empires of world history.

And it dwells in that ambiguity between, you know, um

the high modernist square buildings, um, and the neoclassical white house and the blue dome.

on the roof of on the ceiling of the various great mosques and palaces in

in uh Constantinople or

Central Asia.

And it dwells within that ambiguity.

And um

And that experience

In the twentieth century, that is all that ha communists in China and in Russia they imported

America, the American dream.

They imported the American dream.

The real American dream is the United Republic, and they imported that.

to their countries, and they experienced a confrontation, where they rediscovered their histories and their traditions and their civilizations,

By discovering the internal contradictions within American modernity itself.

And they were reconciled with it and they were chillin'.

They they got over their American phase, so to speak.

and they moved on.

And here we are still in

United States of America, the actual country.

And um we don't realize it yet, but

Our fate has been sealed as a country.

And

We have been outmoded.

Before, we have already been outmoded and we just don't realize it yet.

So,

Where do we go from here?

And what is the now in consideration of that fact?

Well communism if communism in the twentieth century was some kind of Americanism,

Which is not a good thing, by the way, because that was the undialectical communism that had to be sublated in Stalin and Mao and Deng Xiaoping and stuff.

But what does it mean for America to fight itself?

What does it mean for America to confront its own dark shadow, which is what communism is?

Confront its own distilled essence?

What does that confrontation look like?

Well, that confrontation to me was the now.

That is how I could comprehend nowness.

And that confrontation will be the ground and the basis of the universal state

With a universal empire.

That

That will reign supreme in this land.

And what does this have to do?

With Jackson's tweets.

Well,

It has to do with the fact

That

We don't figure this shit out by participating in discourse.

At this point, guys, the reason we're a cult, more than anything,

It's not because I know all of you personally and I'm keeping track of you and I'm whatever and I'm

You know, forcing you to come to the woods with me or something, I

That's not why.

It's because if anything

We control the fucking discourse, we are not in the discourse, we fucking control it.

And we have to be certain and very confident

That we have already figured our shit out.

We're not taking to Twitter to figure our shit out.

We've already figured our shit out.

And we're using Twitter as a tool and as a means to an end.

And we are not really looking at social media or even this kickstream or even Discord for that matter as a ground.

of partaking and uh and and and acquiring fulfillment with respect

To our desire for recognition.

You want to be recognized and you want to be seen?

Good.

Be recognized and be seen by God alone in silence.

Sit alone and silenced.

And be recognized by God.

And then you'll fucking know that this whole thing was rigged from the start.

And that the outcome was decided a long time ago.

Sublime stepboard.

And if you're an atheist and you don't like me saying God,

That's fine.

Instead of God

Just

Replace it with history.

You know?

Replace it literally with history.

Replace it with communism.

Replace it with communism.

Where all of us, all of us mankind, right?

All mankind is already

Walking

In the sunlight, together

In a world

of mercy and justice and equality.

And humanity.

Iron Rose with the ten.

In that world of communism,

is already here.

Or I should say rather

It has already been achieved.

I mean, that outcome was decided.

Before it's already been decided, you don't need.

To convince people, you don't need to pour your heart out and beg people to recognize you, that please we need to have the communist system.

You don't need to fucking do that.

Because the outcome of history has already been decided.

and your role and the content of your activity and you sho you still need to be active, but what should be the content of your activity?

The content of your activity needs to be awakening people to that fact.

So please have the confidence that we know what we're fucking doing here.

Have the confidence that we have our shit figured out.

And

These tweets about Andrew Tate by Jackson

Do not partake.

In that

You need to understand that.

The vision that's compelling Jackson forward.

Informing every single action and decision that he takes.

That is not being

Communicated to you through tweets directly.

He's not opening discourse, okay?

The discourse is closed.

And that's what makes us a cult.

We have a closed discourse.

A closed discourse means that well

We are going toward communism and no, that's I'm not gonna talk about it with you.

We're on the train and we're going forward and if you wanna talk, that's fine, I'm not here to talk to you about it.

We are on a ship and it's sailing.

I'm not gonna talk to you about whether the fucking ship is sailing or not.

It is.

If you can't fucking see that.

That does not change my

My certainty in that fact.

That doesn't mean we don't have to convince people of the fact.

We do.

But don't let it shake your faith.

You know?

And that's that's how we're a cult, I guess.

We have a kind of faith that is just above discourse.

And

Even if you don't know why Jackson's tweeting about T Tate, I think he deserves your good faith that, yeah, this is part of a fucking plan.

There is a reason behind it.

It does serve a purpose.

Maybe you just don't fucking get it, that's fine.

But why are people so fucking like eager to find excuses to lose faith?

I don't get that.

Because me, I'm always looking for excuses to have faith.

'Cause it's all I fucking have.

Have we not delivered results?

Has Jackson not delivered results?

Ask yourself that question.

Before you ever decide to shit on Jackson and treat him in bad faith,

Has he not delivered results for us?

Hmm?

Or maybe you just take it for granted, you know?

Has Jackson not brought

Our party and our flag to the highest, to unthinkable summits and heights.

Has he not done it?

Is there an ACP without Jackson?

Or maybe people take it for granted.

But I'm pretty sure all the people who are saying I like ACP, I just have a problem with that Jackson guy wouldn't even think.

to even entertain something like ACP, were it not for the fucking fact that Jackson made it as relevant as it is in the first place by trafficking such huge volumes of attention toward it.

Oh, I like Haas, but I have a problem with that Jackson guy.

Motherfucker Haas was crucified a long time ago.

And my ability to actually like go super viral was totally cut off from me.

Okay?

I suffered a lot for these fucking words I decided to utter to the world.

I suffered a lot, and I still am, by the way.

But beyond this subjective suffering, I was cut off, which means what?

You know?

It's thanks to Jackson.

It's thanks to Jackson that Haas's words, that Haas's message.

Gets the reach.

gets to reach anything for that matter outside of this community.

You, mostly, you guys are mostly the same people, okay?

From the beginning.

Mostly, you are.

And

You need to understand I was fundamentally kneecapped when it comes to this social media shit.

Why and why am I saying that?

Because I came out in public and I fucking

I came with a message of trying to tell everyone that the discourse is fucking over and none of it matters.

You know, this is not the place to judge human beings on this internet.

It doesn't give you any insight into people's soul like you think it does.

All you're doing is torturing people.

And but I knew there was a paradox, which is for anyone to take me seriously or even consider what I was saying.

You know, I have to be a human being, I have to be seen as human.

And what ended up happening is I was fundamentally dehumanized.

You know, I was really, I was fundamentally dehumanized.

And, um,

And um

You know, uh nobody nobody had to take anything I said seriously.

So you like me, you like Haas, but you hate Jackson, but Jackson has been...

By the way, somebody who's believed in the shit I was saying from the beginning.

Who throughout every period of his success, every period of every summit and mountain top that he's climbed, okay, he's fucking lent his hand and brought me up with him.

And there's nothing I've ever asked Jackson.

Nothing I've ever asked him when it comes to help where he said no.

Okay, yo, can you retweet this?

Can you?

He's never said no.

Yo, could you help me get in contact?

Never in my life.

Not only that, guys.

Even if I don't ask Jackson for any help for anything at all, he's still Stralistani appreciates you.

So when people say they like Haas but they don't like Jackson, it's almost like you're saying, I wish Haas would have just like disappeared.

you know, three or whatever, three years ago, so I could have fond memories of him.

And then move on.

Well I'm not finished yet, you know?

And um

When I'm asking people to have faith and trust the plan, I'm just asking you: do you think that's unfair given the results?

Even the results

Go ahead.

Go ahead, since you like to participate in discourse so much.

Discursively explain how our position has not been justified by results.

Name anyone else who could fucking do what we did.

Name anyone else, and I will shut up.

But name anyone else.

I think a lot of you fucking forget that Jackson was literally one of us, and now he has.

Two, three million followers?

He was the number one guy on X social media.

He's world famous.

Talk to Maduro.

Who could do that?

Who could launch an American Communist Party like we did?

Take the world by storm?

Who could do that?

Who could do what our party has done in the past three

Four months

Since our convention

Who could do that?

Tell me who has fucking done that ever, and I'll shut the fuck up.

I will shut the fuck up if you can give me a single example of anyone.

Who has this level of success and results?

When I not anyone, any movement.

So that's the first thing I'm gonna say when it comes to that controversy.

You're wrong to participate in discourse and silly for it.

Discourse is a means to an end.

We have an agenda that's set in stone and it's closed.

And there is no fucking conversation to be had on Twitter that's going to change the unshakable faith a real believer in this cause has and the final and true and ultimate outcome of this discourse, the real one that was decided long ago, which is the sublime emergence of the universal state.

Led by the Communist Party.

before which all Americans, all mankind, is equal, is the same,

and finds full fulfilment with respect to their longing, their suffering to be recognized.

In the Communist Party

and in the state we are trying to build.

The whole of the people are recognized as one.

The lowest fucking bum down on their luck.

On the middle of the sidewalk with cold pouring rain.

is an equal

to the most professional and refined and wealthy fucking CEO

Sitting atop

The New York City skyline.

And that's our vision.

And that's what we believe.

Fundamentally the same.

with respect to recognition of their humanity, their dignity, and their worthiness of the mercy of a really universal state,

But to address the content of this discourse, and I suppose temporarily demean myself in that respect,

And then the third part of this is going to be the most interesting, which is it's going to be a new term I'm gonna coin.

Laddo Miffy!

Thank you so much, brother.

It's going to be a new term I'm gonna coin, actually.

This new term, I'm going to call it Jackson Hinkle modernity.

And that's going to be the third part of this.

So please stay tuned.

It's gonna be well worth it.

Um

I

I simply have no interest in hearing.

Any claims about Jackson or Andrew Tate?

He was a sex trafficker.

Well,

Ninety nine percent of these people have no issue.

Talking to Hassan Piker

If Jackson were to ever praise Hassan Piker for something, or I or anyone else were to praise Hassan Piker for something.

I wonder if it would cause similar levels of controversy and discourse.

Because Hassan Piker

Did also, by the same logic even more, participate in sex trafficking.

And yet he's not known for that for some reason, why isn't he?

Or would you like to tell me that you think that the reason the Romanian authorities have a problem with the Tates is because they are sex traffickers?

I want to um enlighten you about some sober realism.

Romania is an incredibly fucking corrupt state where there is no rule of law and nobody gives a shit about morals and laws or anything.

It's a mafia state full of actual sex traffickers and pedophiles and the state not only doesn't give a fuck about that, they actually aid and abet it and participate it themselves because there are a bunch of fucking dirty corrupt officials who are themselves themselves

Literally clients of the sex trade.

You think these corrupt Romanian officials aren't sex traffickers themselves or b or or or clients of sex sex industry and sex trafficking?

You think the Romanian fucking state is like some it's it's this profoundly ethical uh you're an idiot.

You don't know anything about these these uh ex communist, anti-communist, Euro trash countries.

Romania is a shithole right now, post-communism, full of poverty and crime and corruption.

And what the Tates are accused of

Is nothing close, nothing even close, to what coincidentally easily flies under the radar of the authorities in that country.

So absolutely.

The charges brought against them, whether they are correct or not, I'm not interested in speculating in.

Because the point I'm trying to make is that wasn't the reason that they were being charged.

The reason they were being charged is because what they were saying deeply upset

The CIA

And

The

American state.

Okay, I know deep state is a really dirty word for some idiots, but that's the truth.

And that is the actual reason he was targeted.

That's why Hassan Piker can visit a brothel and he's totally fine and nothing happens to him.

And, um,.

The Tates, they are participating in, um

Pornography and um and and organizing it or something and um

The results are very different, both with respect to the law and to their how their character and reputation is treated.

And all I'm trying to say

Is that until the two are treated equally, not just the two, until they're treated equally.

You should cast deep suspicion upon

Tate.

Negative Tate discourse.

When it is so rabid and to the point where Jackson's, you know, that's a red line for you.

Well, I have suspicion.

Because you're not treating Hassan, you're not treating the BuzzFeed journalists and the academics and the media personalities and the influencers and the OnlyFans creators themselves with the same level of contempt and criticism, even though they are responsible for so many more girls and young women being trafficked into the sex trade.

Human trafficking, by the way, doesn't mean

You are putting people in car and shipping containers in chains and moving them or whatever.

You are psychologically manipulating.

HIT, what's up?

You are psychologically manipulating people.

Into

The sex trade.

But that's happening on a mass scale.

On a mass scale.

With every single OnlyFans creator that is going in the public and saying, Oh my God, I made twenty million dollars last month That is a sex trafficker by the same standard and logic.

And I'm not saying everyone is I'm not saying that absolves anything.

If you wanna have a conversation about what should be done with people who exploited women in that in the sex trade in general,

You think I'm averse to that conversation?

I'm not.

But let's apply it equally to everyone, including some of the people that were, again,

The the the independent creators who trafficked and encouraged other young women to do it 'cause it's cool and trendy and it makes a lot of money.

I see that the same fucking way actually.

You know?

So save me this bullshit and until we treat everybody equally when it comes to um dispensing justice.

I'm not gonna buy this shit you're saying, that this is your real motivation, okay?

I'm not gonna buy it.

Anyone who's ever said sex work is real work.

Should be seen as just as much as quote-unquote sex traffickers as when what the Tates were doing.

Um.

when they were uh involved in this um cam pornography stuff.

So, you wanted my participation in the discourse?

Well, there it is.

There it is.

By the way, you know what else is very strange?

I'm gonna go ahead and drop another bomb.

The Tates were not found guilty of anything, right?

But Scott Ritter actually was, you know?

He actually was found guilty and he went to prison for it.

But when is there ever this level of contention whenever somebody promotes something Scott Ritter says?

You know?

It's kind of fucking crazy when you think about it.

Like, people can retweet Scott Ritter and talk about Scott Ritter having good takes, but and his past means nothing, right?

But with Tate, everyone loses their fucking mind.

I don't buy that it's because people have concerns about the sex trade and that's why they're losing their minds.

Um I don't actually think that's the reason.

If that was the reason, then they would apply that standard equally and they're not doing that.

So something else is going on.

Was Ritter framed?

Well, the Tates make uh the same argument that they are being framed, okay?

And they haven't even been fucking found guilty of it.

There's there's way more evidence to support that than in the case of Ritter.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Um

Yeah, Chomsky excused the Depstein and n nothing happens to Chomsky.

I don't actually know if he excuses Epstein, just taking your word for it.

Um another thing is that uh

Maybe this is part three, Jackson Hinkle Modernity.

Um

Yeah, I mean uh

I believe in justice.

I believe in destruction of the sex industry, justice for victims.

And uh punishment for

For the enablers.

and the ringleaders.

But until the fucking CEO of OnlyFans is facing trial and is in jail,

And is having their character maligned in the same way the Tates are.

I'm just not going to buy into the idea that.

This is the real reason for them being under attack as much as they are.

You want a universal standard?

Let's have one.

Let's apply it universally.

That's justice.

Justice is not opportunistically.

Um

disguising one's true contentions.

In the name of something.

Something else.

And that is, by the way, discursive nonsense.

And that's what I'm coming to with number three: Jackson Hinkle Modernity.

What is Jackson Hinkle modernity?

Very simple.

Remember, modernity is nowness.

That's what modernity means, nowness, right?

Jackson Hinkle.

On social media.

is not a traditionalist, but a modernist.

And

In this case, the content of what Jackson Hinkles posts is a NOW that is meant to traffic attention now towards something, now for a specific purpose, NOW.

You understand?

It is not this integral totality of tradition building off of itself

And being presented in its rich inter its rich totality of interdeterminations and depth.

Long story short, when Jackson Hinkle tweets something

Instead of drawing logical conclusions from it or reading into it, you should just fucking take it at face value.

Because it's something that's.

Ninety percent of the time meant to be forgotten tomorrow.

It's that simple.

Isn't that simple compared to all the theory I was engaging in?

That's Jackson Hinkle modernity, okay?

This shit is not supposed to be remembered uh in the annals of all history forever to form one totality of interdetermi interrelated determinations.

No, that's what I do.

That's what Haas does.

That's what I fucking do, okay?

When Rev tweets, this man is not your enemy, that is a form of Jackson Hinkle modernity, all right?

That is not like some philosophical mediation that is meant to like but some fucking retards treat it that way.

All the idiots that critique Rev all the time, oh, Rev's tweets are not sophisticated.

What the fuck do you think the purpose is?

The purpose is A promote content very superficially that is adjacent and aligned with us, but most importantly B build a huge fucking account with a lot of engagement, very big on the algorithm that is actually capable of exercising p power when it comes to our need to actually traffic large volumes of attention to items of concern and that are useful to us.

It's these fucking retarded academic word cells who think typed language, written language, is their they have a monopolistic control on all written language.

See, they don't do this shit on TikTok.

On TikTok, everyone fucking knows what it is.

The TikTok you watched is supposed to be forgotten in two hours.

You're not supposed to remember it in two hours.

But on Twitter!

Fucking retarded academic PMC fucks treat it like it's like a law book where like everything is just like I treat Twitter that way, I agree.

But you see how Jackson has 3 million followers and I only have 100,000?

There's a reason for that.

And without Jackson having as much as he has, I wouldn't have as much as I have even.

And nobody would know.

I wouldn't be nearly as famous as I am.

All right.

Uh

I think that's what really breaks people's brains when you just tell them, hey, it doesn't fucking matter, and like everyone's gonna forget this tomorrow.

They're like, no, no.

But this, but that, but X, but Y, but Z, but, but, but, but, but it's not gonna be remembered in like three days.

But but I'll remember it exactly.

Why is that?

Because you are inserting yourself as the subject of discursive recognition.

When you should already

Know what the fuck you're doing before you even say anything on Twitter.

You should have completely sorted out any kind of.

recognition or discourse stuff, you should have silently read a book that completely enlightened you, or watched a cult infrared stream that completely filled you in, that fucking like gave you confidence and belief in what this shit is actually about.

But no, people remain suspended in discourse for some fucking reason.

When discourse is

Fulfilled already, it's over.

Um

Yeah, Jackson will have a tweet of him literally like a photo of him with like Putin in Canada or some shit.

Oh my god What what would Hegel think of this?

What are the philosophical conclusions?

What are the

How does this affect LeBron's legacy?

It's like a bunch of academic retards who just don't fucking understand the nature of modernity in the in the information age.

Yeah, this is the modernity you always fucking praise, idiot.

Modernity is nowness.

It's nowness.

It's not there in this and allness and being and the whole interconnected universe.

No, it's now, now, now, now, now.

That's what you wanted, right?

That's progress.

Well, consider Jackson the most progressive.

Jackson is a ruthless modernist.

Jackson.

is a ruthless

avant garde modernist.

He's like Henry Ford.

Well, it's a bad example.

He's like um he's a ruthless modernist in a train

And all of Jackson Hinkle's detractors are like these fucking backward, feudal, backwater, like, you know, um, sentimental, like, reactionary like uh Joseph Day Maestre and whatever fucking Thomas Carlyle.

And they're like a bunch of like

They're a bunch of like rubbish from the feudal era that are just gonna get mowed down by the Jackson Hinkle progress of modernity.

And that is the problem.

Jackson Hinkle is a Zoomer modernist.

And all of his detractors are these fucking TF2, what's up?

Jackson Hinkle is a ruthless modernist, and all of his detractors are a bunch of romantic, sentimental, feudal, reactionary fucks.

Jackson is casting fire to the four olds of discourse.

That is why he is fundamentally progressive in form.

I defend it completely.

Okay?

It's progress!

Fuck the integrity of your discourse, you academic bitch.

This is TikTok now.

Um it's it's that simple though.

But people are confused.

But it's very simple.

Yeah, this is fucking skibbity toilet now.

Fucking discourse yourself out of that box.

Alright, progress.

We are progressive, they are reactionary.

Can't you see that, like, the you can see this was all decided before, like, it's over.

You need to have the bare minimum of, like, charity where you're just like, well, yeah, I could see how this actually.

The message of this is very simple.

Like, okay, I'll I'll break down semiotically, or not semiotically.

I'll break down like unconsciously

If it's very simple, like Jackson's tweet, right?

He's like, I support Andrew Tate for Prime Minister.

Modernity, nowness, right?

What does it mean?

It means Jackson is very happy with Andrew Take's foreign policy views, and they are way better than the ones that prevail in Downing Street right now.

So it's like, yeah, let's.

Downing Street's foreign policy is so bad that even this would be better.

Like, yeah, this is better.

Like, it's really simple.

You don't have to read into it past that.

It's like so simple.

But people are reading into it and making a fucking academic treatsee about it when it's uh when it's not um

It there's nothing more complicated than that.

And um

It's modernity, it's nowness, it's not allness, it's nowness.

It's nowness, it's it's supposed to be abstracted from all of the interrelated determinations that it's a part of, the concrete whole it's a part of.

It's supposed to serve that purpose.

Because in order to give expression to the concrete directly, you have to be like Haas and have a cult.

You can't reach the masses who are alienated and who are plugged in in uh uh uh an alienated and abstracted totality defined by a division of labor.

For whom they actually do experience reality as a unrelated sequence of now-ness, right?

And in order for us to influence that just a little bit, we have to get plugged into that.

And we have to basically.

In making these interventions in that sequential experience of now-ness.

Meanwhile, there's this fucking huge master plan in the background that nobody even takes seriously because it's just too crazy to believe.

And everyone just nobody believes in this like big master plan.

Everyone just believes in Jackson Hinkle's.

Um fame, and they think the fame is all there.

There's no like plan, they don't get it.

But that's the point.

If they did understand it, we'd be in trouble because they'd realize we actually are very dangerous because we are a fucking cult, right?

Um.

Anyway, uh, or a cult in an ironic sense for all the Autistic people.

Um

Yeah, the Costco guys are historically progressive.

Very true.

The booms are but that we get the boom, that's all we do.

We get the boom, it's that simple.

Nobody questions it on TikTok, but on X it's all different.

Um

I also want to say that like ACP has never endorsed any no ACP has never said anything about Andrew Tate ever.

So I don't know why the fuck people are again.

It's the people are being selective about their Jackson Hinkle modernity.

They're like, oh, Jackson is like the most viral guy and he is like associated with ACP.

Therefore, everything he says is literally the law of ACP.

Well, you fucking idiot.

The ACP is a material collective institution.

It's like it's an actual fucking party.

It's not an ephemeral, discursive object on the fucking internet.

It's actually an institution with protocols and laws and a collective voice and it issues statements about it's a formal thing.

You don't just throw onto ACP these vague discursive associations based on Twitter.

You know, we actually yeah, what we say actually does matter in a professional and formal capacity as a party.

That that does matter.

All right.

Um

But in any case, um

I always love when someone quote tweaks Jackson, like saying something controversial and they're like, you see, this is what they are.

This is the holistic integral totality of all interrelated determinations that defines the content of what all ACP and MAGA communism is and infrared is as a as a completely holistic consistent ideology.

No, you fucking idiot, that's a tweet.

Which is modern, it's nowness, it's not this, like, ideological, like, tome, it's not this precept of this ideological project of, you know, like this contribution to theory of, like, fucking, you know, some kind of, like,

People like to take it and freeze it and be like, you see everything.

No, no, no, motherfucker, you wanna do that?

Then do it with everything.

Everything, how everything is interrelated, and all of the interrelated rationale behind it, and all of the interrelated determinations, and all the logical conclusions we draw from it.

Once you do it to everything in the discourse, you're gonna fucking realize, oh wait, the infrared guys are just right anyway.

You're being selective about how holistic you're treating

The logical conclusions of everything Jackson says are you're being selective.

Because you should do that with everything then.

You know, not just his tweets, but the whole fucking thing, the whole discourse.

Once you do that, you'll see the brilliance and the logic and rationale behind why he says what he says.

But people don't think concretely.

They don't want to think concretely.

They want to think abstractly.

And that's the issue.

They're thinking abstractly, but in a selective way.

In a way that's selective.

Um

Kantbot used to talk about destroying the discourse.

Everyone doesn't realize that everything that's transpired was a consequence between an argument between me and Kantbot.

Kantbot and I this is literally like Bloodborne, where there was a debate between the guy who sits on a chair before you kill the spider and the other guy who turned into a big monster.

I forgot their name.

Anyway, me and Con me and Kant's bot were, um

We were sitting in, like, this extremely sophisticated, like, arcane library, both wizards, both whatever.

And we both agreed

That the discourse needed to be destroyed.

And he understood that was my goal, and I understood it was his goal.

And we were having tea.

Master Wilhelm, exactly.

And who's the other guy?

A Ludwig.

Master Wilhelm and Ludwig.

The debate they ha or not Ludwig, the other guy.

I forget.

Anyway, uh Kantbot was Master Wilhelm who ju wanted to just sit on a chair and I was the g the guy who wanted to turn the blood into the healing church and actually like make something of it, right?

Anyway, we were sitting and uh shar we were sharing tea.

And we we both agreed the discourse must be destroyed.

And Kantbot was saying, the only way we destroy the discourse is just by.

Telling people to shut up and like not even giving it recognition.

We're not even gonna give it attention.

We're just gonna say shut up and like, you know, we're gonna resist participating in it entirely.

We're going to completely purify ourselves from any acknowledgment and just totally turn our backs on it.

And then I was sitting there.

And I said

No, the way we destroy discourse is from within.

We have to actually hijack the discourse and engineer it and manipulate it.

And through the appearance of us earnestly participating within discourse, we are actually disclosing to people the revelation that it has already ended.

And Kantbod said, No, you can't do that.

You can't do that.

And I said, Watch me.

And ever since then, we've went our separate paths.

The same goal, but different strategies.

And, um

Kantbaat is the Old Testament and Haas is the Islamic t Islam.

I am here to build a grand, sublime empire for all the faithful, for all humanity, all mankind.

Kantbaat wants to just kind of

Well

He thinks that is pointless.

I don't know.

Anyway.

Um

Who's Christianity?

Logo.

That's why me and Logo get along so well.

This is a very bad metaphor, right?

Forget this whole metaphor.

Forget this whole metaphor.

Very problematic metaphor.

I take it back.

Anyway, um

Uh

Yes.

Um well, I didn't necessarily call him Jewish.

I

Pre-Christian biblical tradition is not necessarily the same as modern Judaism.

Uh i there's continuity, of course, and Judaism claims that continuity.

Not wrongly, I don't think, but uh it's not quite the same.

Um

It's not quite the same.

For example, Jesus was a Jew.

But not in the modern sense.

But nonetheless, it was the pre-Christian biblical tradition, right?

I would say Khanbad is more like Greek to actually be uh s correct.

He's more Greek.

So when I now I solved everything, see?

Anyway, um

Uh what was I gonna say?

Uh

So

What was I saying?

Ah, yes, the Jackson thing.

Well,

I want to remind people that

If you are hung up on Jackson's tweets, I recommend you experience getting bombed by a high Mars missile.

Not successfully, but like it hits you 300 meters away.

And if you have that experience, you will realize what a real problem is.

And that's the truth.

After after I was almost after the High Mars experience, I kind of just don't have patience for like people crying over Jackson's tweet any more at all.

'Cause I was really shown perspective that

Like there is just some shit that that is the real world and some shit that just doesn't fucking matter at all.

Put it into per s there's real problems in the world, all right?

Like I know we want to think we have arrived at the end of history and we're all Nietzsche and last men.

But I think that's only jobless people.

I think only the jobless or the PMC, which is the same thing.

Only the jobless and the PMC give a shit and get hung up about this bullshit.

People who face real problems, whether they're soldiers, whether they're workers, or whether they are people in a war zone, do not care about tweets or see them as real problems.

So that is a really simple way of summing up my view, but that's the truth.

The laptop class cares because, like, the PowerPoint the language we use on the PowerPoint presentation, that's how you pay your fucking bills.

All right.

How, you know, the fucking website, I, you know.

The website bio does that's how you fucking literally put food on your table.

But that does not put you into proximity with real adversity or real problems.

And that's the issue.

Again, the unity of the jobless and the PMC, it's always this class alliance.

that is causing problems on the internet.

The ja and I know this 'cause I'm one of them.

I'm a fucking streamer.

I'm plugged into the Discourse twenty four seven.

Um

That's why I go to the fucking gym every day.

Just so I can be faced with physical ex adversity every day.

Um, you you know.

And then then I can spend the rest of my time being a a mental laborer parasite.

But for a portion of the day I'm facing physical adversity.

Um

because that puts me into proximity with reality.

And um inadvertently I also was put into proximity with reality when I was almost struck by a high Mars missile.

And now I realize that uh really the tweets don't matter.

Put it, there's two types of people.

People who don't want problems from the internet.

And what they want i they they they're so good faith and charitable to tweets 'cause they're like, yeah, I don't want a problem.

Just whatever, I'll just be good faith.

And then when it is a problem, it's a really bad like burden, like oh shit, fuck.

But then there's like jobless people who are like, oh, I'm looking for a problem.

Yeah.

Yeah, this is a my patience has gone thin.

I've excused so many things as non-problems.

But this is this is my last straw.

I can only hold it in for so long.

I've been looking for a problem so long.

And I finally can't help it.

This is a problem.

I mean, yeah, you were looking for discourse problems from the beginning.

We w the fact you had to repress this urge to just make a fucking big deal out of words on the fucking computer screen.

Means you need a reality check.

You know?

You probably fucking need to reevaluate.

your life and your not only your life, your perspective on life.

Some of these PMC people, you know, look, it's fine.

I'm I don't hate you.

Do your job.

It's well paying.

It's good.

I'm just asking you to have some perspective, that's all.

I'm not saying I have, I'm better, I'm a streamer, but I try to have perspective and you don't, and that's the difference.

And you should just have perspective, you know?

Just try to have perspective.

I'm not saying quit your job.

I'm not saying hate yourself and loathe yourself.

I'm saying try to have perspective.

That's all.

I do it.

Why can't you?

What is PMC?

Like, you know, people who um

People who like people, you know, okay, this is what the definition of PMC is people who go to work and there's a bunch of like funky colorful couches at their workplace.

And there's like T V's and like, you know, there's like a Switch and there's like

There's like all this like

There's all these couches everywhere.

Bean ba tho not just couches, those um those bean bags.

Is that is that what they're called?

That's the definition.

What's the PMC stand for?

It stands for pontification.

Many crying Pontification Pontification of Much Crying.

That's the meaning of PMC.

Pontification of much crying.

Presentation

Um

Of much people may cry.

No, that's not it, 'cause it's people are certain to cry, not may, people will.

That's the PWC.

Look, we need the PMC.

Wagner PMC We really need the PMC consciousness in our party.

I'm not speaking as a party, sorry.

Within infrared we need the PMC consciousness.

Right?

The Wagner PMC consciousness.

And with that being said, ladies and gentlemen.

I accept your hundreds of sub donations for that incredible fucking

Thing I just said.

I'll wait.

And with that being said, ladies and gentlemen, we are.

We are.

I'm hungry and I have to go.

So

I yeah, Jennifer, not this is not Jen.

Jennifer will actually do it.

Yo, Barrillo, thank you.

What the fuck?

You guys are doing it.

Austral Stani.

Harold with the five.

Suez.

What the fuck?

Blackpack with the ten.

So this is the only community, this is what a cult we are.

The only community where I tell a joke, Suez, what's going on?

Iron Rose.

Wiz Wazzle.

Um see I almost wanna tell you guys to stop and that it was just a joke but like why would I want you to stop yo banana

Third, Isaiah with the five.

What's going on?

What the fuck?

Mechareb with the one.

This is what I get for a good joke.

All for a good joke.

Comrade Kid with the five.

What's going on?

What's going on?

See, I'm not against the PMC.

I just want to be the only one.

I'm not against the PMC.

I just want to be the only one.

Only I make a living from mental labor.

No one else.

The only person who should be entitled to mental.

Work is me.

I'm trying to destroy all of the competitors so I can have all the money for myself because I'm just a self-aggrandizing.

Scammer M I G with the five.

Alright, I want you guys to know something.

I'm gonna be full disclosure.

There's a secret donation goal you don't know about.

Of infrared.

Once the goal is reached, I disappear forever, pack my bags, and I have an island waiting for me and a yacht.

And I'm it's the scammer's escape.

Johnny with the five.

As soon as I have a secret donation goal, and you guys are getting very close.

As soon as you reach the donation goal, I pack my bags in my briefcase as a true cult leader and I make a run, yeah, rug pull, and then I'm off to paradise.

And then the song that's playing is What Suez with the 50!

What the fuck?

Suez.

Wow, now I feel bad for making that joke.

Wow, Suez, holy shit!

With the fifty, this is crazy.

Suez, thank you.

Um

Now I leave.

I'm just kidding.

Now my goal is met.

Um, what call stream do you recommend we listen to after?

I don't know.

I don't know who's streaming at 2 a.m.

Um.

Would you guys believe me if I like straight up did not expect that at all?

I straight up did not expect so much.

Of that from one joke.

What the f well, guys, I literally said 100 subs.

As a joke for like the Wagner PMC thing.

But you guys actually donated like a hundred subs.

Like you actually did.

Yeah, I'm checking no, it was actually like a hundred.

Like a little yeah, pretty much a hundred.

That's fucking crazy.

If that's not a cult, I don't know what is.

Okay?

If that's not a cult, I don't know what is.

And guys, the hour, the song I will play when I scam everyone in the world and make haste.

To paradise.

The song I'll play is um

Well, it's a big mystery, right?

It's a big mystery.

But I'll fill you in on a hint.

Hot zone, is that what devils do?

Took you so long, where only fools gone.

I shook the angel and ya

I'm myself on the ground.

As enough to go

Feel with all the strength I find There's nothing I can't do

Is that what demons?

They bang down angels not come

Whoa.

I'm not sure if I can do it.

William Jennings, genuinely thank you.

I was just enjoying the song, actually.

But, guys, I'll see you.

See you next time, maybe tomorrow.

Bye-bye.