We're going to war

Still be so quiet and small.

Prayer found

Started to grow.

Now I'm a foes.

You can't overthrow every start in every ten.

Felt my strength, now I'm standing in.

Now my life's unstoppable.

Come.

Um

I appreciate you, brother.

Azure, thank you, brother.

Ed Gentry with the five.

What's going on, man?

Red Gear Solid with the one.

What's going on, brother?

Red Ambiance.

Appreciate you.

Crass, what's going on, man?

So guys, it's Tuesday.

That means that we are past the deadline of the threat of the attack our enemies were making.

Um, and we should talk about what that means and uh what the implications are.

So, basically, what happened is that they saw how unified and mobilized we are, and I think they're planning on trying to take us off guard.

So, what we're gonna have to do for the foreseeable future, actually, is maintain a heightened state of vigilance and a heightened state of awareness.

And you, you guys are awake, and you need to keep it up, okay?

Tundra, what's up?

Because the goal is to attack us by surprise, that's going to be the next goal.

And that's something that we cannot allow to happen.

Everyone here needs to be absolutely on their toes and get ready for a year of conflict and war and struggle and more.

Johnny, I appreciate you.

Now, before anyone tries to take what I say out of context, there was a stream in which I talked about how the internet is just as real.

Johnny, I appreciate you.

I said the internet is very real, okay?

I said it is an attribute of real warfare.

The intensity, the antagonism, the heightened state of conflict that you find on the internet, it's just the same as in real life.

And there is a very small line between real world conflicts and the internet conflicts, okay?

It's not that big of a leap, okay?

People decided to take what I said out of context as if I was endorsing that, as if I was saying that, yeah, I want everyone to just go from the internet to fighting on the internet to killing each other in real life.

That's not what I was saying.

What I was saying is that that's already happening.

That's already happening when it comes to, wallow, I appreciate you.

It's already happening when it comes to the phenomena of terrorism, which of course we oppose.

Of course we oppose terrorism.

It's in our Constitution that terrorism is fundamentally antithetical with the American Communist Party.

And also, I gave it another example, which is gang warfare.

Now, the reason I mentioned that wasn't because I was encouraging those things to you guys, but because I wanted you guys to take seriously, I wanted you to take the internet seriously.

I mean, it's a super cringe thing to say, I guess, to millennials, but it's very, very fucking serious.

You should take it seriously.

You should take doxing seriously.

And by the way, doxing is an act of violence.

Absolutely it is.

When someone doxes you, they're doing so with the expectation that physical harm is going to come your way.

They're putting you in danger, not only you, but your family.

Okay?

So that's an incredibly violent thing to do with very much violent intentions.

There's a lot of malice behind it.

You know, violent malice.

And I'm telling you guys that so that you don't think that somehow the real conflict is just going to be offline and you can ignore the internet.

You need to take the discourse very seriously.

Because as I've been saying for a very long time, it's only a matter of time before shit hits the fan and we are going to become Liberia.

And why Liberia?

Because it was an American colony and what happened there is literally an omen as far as what's going to happen in this country, in my opinion.

Okay.

Nihilistic terrorism, gang violence, warlordism, digital, you know, social media age warlordism on a mass scale, I think is probably going to come.

That's not something we want to initiate.

That's not something we are interested in being at the avant-garde of.

We are law-abiding.

We follow the law.

We're not doing anything whatsoever that could possibly give the government a pretext to crack down on us or take away our rights and liberties.

But that being said, we do need to organize and prepare within legal means.

And we need to organize and prepare.

And part of that means defending our battle standard, our flag, our party, our movement.

You absolutely need to treat the internet as real, not by going and doing things, you know, committing, starting fights offline, but by doing it online.

You need to absolutely defend and wage this war online and take it seriously.

That was my point.

My point wasn't that I want this to start, you know, I want the intensity to trans no, I'm saying just as you would take a real war seriously, take this seriously.

You know, that's my point.

It does matter.

Controlling the discourse matters, and it's an attribute of discourse.

And it's more, we don't need to commit any crimes.

We don't need to violate the law at all.

We just need to make sure we have the discourse under control.

And that is literally more f um how should I say?

That is literally more of a victory when it comes to warfare right now, okay?

Uh and it is fundamental to warfare in general.

And and I do think a civil war will probably come in the near future.

And yes, I mean, uh we will have to we will be underground for something like that probably.

We'll probably be banned from everywhere.

Like s like everyone else, there will be no social media at all, probably, right?

And um

That was the whole point, and I stand by it, all right?

I absolutely have never endorsed terrorism.

I will never endorse it.

What I endorse, by the way, when I say there's a thin line of courage, real courage is not terrorism, by the way.

Real courage is being someone who's demoralized, who has many doubts, who's maybe depressed, who's lost, and who becomes inspired by this online movement and in its message, right?

That's just purely on their screen, their computer screen and their phone screen.

And then they decide to join the Communist Party and pick up, you know.

Uh I was gonna say shovel, but not really, we don't we're not really digging anything.

But you know, uh

Get out there and help your communities, get out there and make a difference, get out there and organize and make a difference based on making that transition, making that commitment is way more courageous than terrorism, by the way.

Yeah.

You're risking the possibility that am I doing something pointless?

Am I doing something...

That will fail?

Am I joining this party?

Is it you're taking a risk?

And that takes a lot of courage.

And terrorism is a form of cowardice.

Okay?

It's the opposite.

Attacking innocent civilians is indefensible, and it's what cowards do.

And uh I've never said anything close to endorsing that.

But then again, look.

There's been a clear concentrated campaign to create pretexts for using the government to crack down on me, or the government itself is trying to create the pretext to crack down on me, whatever.

But I'm not guilty of any crimes, so that's the problem.

From allegations of gun running to Haiti to this, you know, it's the same actors that are responsible for it.

They're trying to create the pretext for banning our movement, basically, and rendering it illegal and associating it with crimes.

And everyone needs to take that seriously.

You need to take it very, very seriously, okay?

Speaking of taking some things seriously, I want to give you guys some updates when it comes to the Danny thing.

Um, John Brown, I appreciate you to give you some updates about the Danny thing.

So, Kyle and I talked to Dan Cohen and Kim Ives, as well as some legal counsel, and we have all come to the agreement that we are going to pursue this matter in court.

And we have already filed a private injunction to Danny Shaw to cease and desist from his defamatory statements and retract his claims.

And he posted something today reaffirming his defamation.

Although he, I did, I guess he decided to change his story.

I don't understand why he did that because the new story is just as much of a lie as the old one, but it just goes to show he has no credibility, okay?

In any case, um

We were basically advised that it's it's dangerous to to to to to treat this matter as as an internet, like w we need to hold trial on the internet because it is a very serious allegation we don't want to play around with.

So we're just going to deal with it legally, and that's the end of it.

And that includes all evidence that is relevant for that because it's very important.

It's very important we treat this with utmost seriousness and not play around with it and just go through the legal system.

And that includes, you know, when it comes to how we're handling the evidence, for the simple reason that Danny has already set the precedent for changing his story.

And the story that he'll probably change to, no matter what we do, is one of two things.

One, he'll pivot to saying that actually it wasn't said at this meeting, but there's another meeting that it was said at, conveniently a meeting that there's no evidence of, right?

That's one of the things he'll try to pivot to.

The other thing he'll try to pivot to is that he maybe he hallucinated because he relapsed on drugs or he was thinking of someone else or something different.

But legally speaking, he's going to probably have to make the argument that, no, no, no, I wasn't knowingly lying.

I was just, I somehow, for whatever reason, thought this.

And we are not trying, we are not going to allow him to weasel his way into that excuse for the simpler reason that Danny Shaw has a precedent of demonstrating that he's a duplicitous and bad faith actor who is more than willing to tell lies to fulfill his agenda and his goals.

Case in point, he spent months in the party deceiving everyone about his state of mind and his position and his commitments and whatever.

And he was doing that for months and months and months, fooling everyone while he's secretly recording us and trying to conspire and plot and whatever.

But the allegation he made is so serious that we're going to have to handle it through the courts.

So that's the update I want to give you, basically.

Um and we are we it's we absolutely intend on pursuing this because it's extremely dangerous, guys.

There may be a an inter a big new when Haiti re-enters the news cycle, um this is an incredibly dangerous allegation to make, you know, and we we're not going to allow it to stand.

Uh no matter what.

It's not going to be allowed to stand.

So that's my update on that.

I guess on a lighter note, it's kind of funny that in the video he got the cease and desist, so he thought that his way of weaseling himself out of any legal consequences was spelling the words out rather than saying them directly.

Like G you you know

Uh Danny that

is a legitimate and valid um tactic for a five-year-old to avoid saying a curse word in front of their parents

But it has no validity or credibility or significance when it comes to a defamation suit.

All right.

I don't know who told you this idea that just by spelling it out loud, it's somehow less defamatory.

I don't know where you're getting your legal counsel or who gave you that advice, but I recommend getting a new legal counsel.

Because you guys may have been confused about why he was spelling it out, but the reason is because we filed injunction last night.

Did I say it was this morning?

Because it was in the AM last night.

So it was at last night.

But uh that is why, okay.

So

Uh uh yeah, I d I'm I'm not sure where he he's getting these this advice from, but he needs to find a new some new counsel.

What do I think of the fact that John deactivated his Twitter?

What is there to think of it?

You know, we don't know what we don't know if he's acting under duress.

That is the most Johnston, appreciate you.

That's the most charitable explanation.

And I think the reason, and um.

If that's not the case, I mean, it is unspeakable and unforgivable what he did, which speaks for itself, right?

But even if he was acting under duress, frankly I I'm not that sympathetic.

I don't have much more sympathy.

I mean, the gravity of this cause and the commitments required.

This is not the Red Army Cross.

This is the Communist Party.

This is a commitment.

You have to be all in.

Okay.

You have to be absolutely serious and dedicated.

It's not, this is not a side NGO thing that you can just do because you feel.

This is a very, very serious commitment.

Okay.

It is.

Uh it is nothing to trifle with.

I want to also up to you guys update you guys about something.

I had a call with Sarah from DDG and Borut, by the way, and the reason is because Borut again was just affirming that, hey man, listen, you know, obviously you weren't lying about the High Mars.

I was there, you know.

And they communicated to me and expressed to me that they had no part whatsoever in John's decision or behavior.

And I am inclined to believe them, actually.

I think I actually said this before, but I think we ruled out that Sarah or DDG had anything to do with this, really.

Or were a motivating cause or factor.

I think I said that Friday, but I don't think.

I mean, I I I don't have any evidence or uh there there is nothing that indicates or leads me to suspect that she was a catalyst for any of this in any way.

Um

So

So that's my uh judgment.

Uh frankly, you know.

They, you know, had no part in it and they they're not interested in being involved in our politics.

Uh at all.

So that's another update I wanted to give you guys.

And um

I don't want everyone to sigh and and chill out yet because

The enemy is still active and plotting and and and and you know preparing something.

We don't know again, just like I told you Sunday.

But I think that you know.

I think it has been uh th th th th this is now becoming a legal thing, basically, is my update.

This is now something we are gonna be it was incredibly shocking and bizarre Friday when he did that, but

Um, it is what it is.

Um and now we have to actually take the next steps to to consider it legally, you know.

So

In any case

Um

There is much more I can say about Danny and whatever, but again, we are going to move forward in a proportional way.

Um it's that simple, you know.

Well, and not proportional, but more like

Mm-hmm.

Alex, appreciate you.

We're gonna move forward on the basis of treating this like we're under siege and it's a war.

And in a war, we're not gonna exhaust, we're not gonna fire everything right away.

Uh such is the nature of war, you know.

Such is the nature of war, frankly.

Mm.

So

These are the updates.

Uh Daniel Tutt was upset that I mentioned him on my last stream.

Well, I I I have a I had every right to mention the bad behavior of Daniel Tutt, frankly, because he committed an injury toward me by mentioning me publicly, okay, first, and the party.

And he, you know, basically attacked me in public first.

Which I didn't.

All I did was correctly relay to you the the chronological order of events as far as what happened.

As far as what actually happened, okay?

People endorsed Danny who later very much regretted it because they realized this guy is probably a junkie.

An actual credible journalists like Dan Cohen who were roped into this actually revealed the truth, and now suddenly people are backing away from Danny's derangement and and and and insanity.

Again, that is also a charitable characterization of Danny's behavior because it frankly glows.

In the dark, okay.

Why is a guy traveling to East Timor to support CIA-backed

Um, actors and forces, you know?

These are things that, admittedly, I didn't pay much attention to.

Uh what about Nikki?

Nikki is completely

Not involved in any of this, I don't know why you're mentioning her.

But that guy is a very shady g and again, if if you saw how duplicitous and deceptive he is, you would instantly know that anything he says is bullshit and should be taken as bullshit.

If he can sit there and tell all of us what he told us.

you know, sincerely, guys, I'm so excited for what's next and whatever, while plotting on our downfall simultaneously, I think that you would understand that this person has no credibility whatsoever.

So

That's that.

We're still going to be moving forward with our recruitment drive and our streamlined system of um recruiting members, which will bring massive volumes of people into proximity with the party and technically in the party.

But we are introducing a cadre recruit distinction now that will streamline the process of

bringing people into the party.

So that that is good.

That's very promising.

We're moving forward with our planned party work and everything is fine.

And once again, the last thing I'll say on that note, right?

If we were the P S O

or the DSA or any of these other organizations, and something like this happened.

It would cripple us.

Not only would it cripple us, it would at minimum create the circumstances for a weak and conciliatory leadership and b changing our policies internally to appease the professional managerial element at the expense of the blue collar working class element.

And these feds who are doing this cointel pro stuff, I think really did not understand that ACP is not the PSL.

That their traditional ways of wrecking and defanging and neutralizing parties that they've been doing since the 1970s will not work on our party.

And I think that deeply disturbed them, is a source of disturbance for them.

And the only reason they haven't squashed us like bugs yet is because they are hyper-focused on the Trump administration.

Because here's another very interesting thing.

The Trump administration is going to divide the federal government and federal agencies down the line.

Major heads and figures and bureaucrats in the system.

Just l it's almost like the way uh they conspired against me, they're gonna conspire against Trump.

The way uh Danny and whatever not to compare myself to Trump, but it's a basic law of politics, is what happens.

Trump is consolidating himself as a very powerful central authority.

And that is going to lead to the formation of secret political associations in the highest levels of government which will conspire and plot for things like coups and and other kinds of things.

Um the people that are that he's revoking clearance for are the ones not doing Takia, frankly.

I don't want to call it Takia 'cause Takia is based, but in any case, th this is going to be an administration with a divided house, okay?

A divided house cannot stand.

The the government bureaucracies are going to be divided.

The CIA guys are very ideological.

Some of them support Trump, some of them very much don't.

And there's going to be an internal conflict at the highest levels.

And um

Gabba, that is the scariest thing about all this.

We suspect something kind of similar.

That this attempt was intentionally sloppy to study our responses.

And yes, that is a very frightening thought, and it is not something that can be ruled out.

And it is kind of a little likely, actually.

I think they are very interested in knowing how we operate and our MO and how they can really fuck with us.

And yeah, I think that's something that's been on all of our minds, actually.

But it's something we've considered.

But it's not going to be that easy, at the very least.

Um, frankly, it's not going to be that easy.

Uh, okay, so, um

Now

Let's talk about what's on everyone else's mind.

In the world outside of our cult, right?

Which is Elon Musk's Hitler salute or his Roman salute?

I was actually shocked by it.

Kind of, not too much.

But I put two and two together.

Okay, maybe I'm being paranoid, but stay with me here.

I mean, Hitler content on X has been blowing up.

Is that just because Hitler is so popular, or might it be because it is being boosted artificially on the algorithm?

I don't know.

I'm not saying I know one way or another.

Maybe I'm woefully out of touch.

I know you guys know that in real life, it's a fact that there are young people becoming radicalized by the extreme right and who are saying, oh yeah, Hitler, whatever, they're endorsing Hitler.

But it's a chicken or the egg type of thing.

What started making it go viral?

Because as soon as Elon Musk took over, it started becoming very viral.

It wasn't a slow drip process.

It instantly became super viral, right?

And I wonder how much of that is being boosted artificially on the algorithm.

And if Elon is himself culpable in that.

Now, what is the angle that would make that possible or probable?

Well, I'll tell you.

So one of the things me and Jackson have been looking at, because Jackson had a really interesting guest on legitimate targets.

I actually forget the episode, so forgive me.

But I was in Moscow, I think, when he had the guest, or maybe I was in Donbass, I don't remember.

But he revealed something very interesting about Elon Musk and his family history.

So Elon Musk's is descended from political um personalities who were part of something called the technocracy movement.

Yeah, the Canadian historian.

Exactly.

Matt Erett, exactly.

And the technocracy movement

Believed in eugenics, and it was this, and it also believed in a North American superstate, right?

It was one of its things, Greenland, taking Mexico, taking parts of South America even, the north of South America, the Caribbean.

And they that is undoubtedly a factor in the territorial expansionism we've been seeing Trump entertain and take seriously.

And I hate sensationalism.

I also hate libtards.

And resistance toward Trump has become.

By the way, when I say technocracy, I'm not talking about technocracy in general.

I'm talking about a specific Canadian movement in the 1930s and 40s, which was also, I think, placed under legal scrutiny for insufficient loyalty to Canada during the war, during the Phoney War, which Canada was, as a member of the Commonwealth, also in, right?

So the connection is there.

And it it was a big factor in the formation and rise of Silicon Valley.

Super spooky and um

Shelve that, right?

But it it it it it's not out of the question that Elon Musk harbors Nazi sympathies or views.

Um Shreil Stani, I appreciate you.

Another thing to consider, which is more, I guess, Strail Stani, what's up?

Another thing to consider, which is more in line with what Logo has said.

It's basically that

Well, Elon Musk could just be a Redditor who i you know, he's doing the Roman salute 'cause he's he's doing Rome LARP, you know.

That's another

I guess, thing out there, we could say that he's just like being edgy, and it's like, oh, it's just like Rome.

JB, what's up?

Another possibility, and I talked to Jackson about this, and he was kind of just like, well, he is just kind of autistic, and maybe it was an accident.

I don't think it was an accident.

Myself.

Um

But I can't discount the possibility, I guess.

Uh you know, he is very autistic, I guess.

But in any case, it was very bizarre.

But a Paul Cockshot raises a very good point.

And again, the resistance to Trump was discredited.

Completely after 2016.

And maybe that was the point, by the way.

And Tifa was discredited completely.

Maybe that was the point, by the way.

I hate using this word loosely.

But it does seem like the United States

ruling classes and the deep state and whatever else you wanna

Call the machine in Washington.

Um, I really get the strong impression that it is.

It is actually starting to adopt an overtly fascist tendency.

The notion that Trump is a fascist is very cringe and very much reminiscent of the stupid stuff from twenty sixteen that we're all familiar with.

And Trump is not extraordinarily a fascist.

He's no more fascist than Biden.

But I'm looking at a long term tendency of the trajectory of the American state that actually begun begins much earlier than Trump, including Du George W.

and Obama.

And it's not about Trump.

The problem with twenty sixteen Antifa nonsense is that it was too focused on Trump's personality and this strange Oedipal relationship to Trump with these strange uh psycho-sexual Freudian uh connotations, oh it's about the father versus the rebellion and it's about a man versus woman war that was a bunch of nonsense, okay?

That's a complete distraction.

But according to our traditional orthodox Marxist Leninist conception and understanding of what fascism actually is, which is you know an an a an aggressive form of militarism that is combined with the interests of imperialist and financial capital,

We do need to take seriously the consideration that the US is on a fascist trajectory.

And yes, that is accelerating under the Trump administration.

Now, here's my theory as far as why that is and how that has come to be.

I don't think Trump was ever actually some fascist, okay?

I think Trump in 2016.

was a disruptive populist who did not have a plan.

He did not have a plan.

Um that was pure MAGA back then, right?

But I think what happened is that through the course of the Biden administration, the fascistic elites

An oligarchy decided that they're they were going to weaponize Trump's kind of disruptive politics and employ that in the service of implementing the fascist dictatorship that they always had the intention of implementing.

So Trump was this eccentric populist in 2016.

That was the MAGA movement, whatever.

It disrupted American politics a lot.

2020, they have Biden.

And then they realize under Biden, they're not really able to implement the fascist dictatorship agenda that they wanted to and were planning.

So they basically looked at Trump, who's a very disruptive, creative, whatever politician, and they're like, we're just going to do this under Trump and have Trump be the face of it.

Because Trump is a disruptor and Trump is populistic.

Trump is someone that is very popular.

Trump can change things.

There's not going to be a lot of civil resistance if it's Trump.

Because what?

Is the Midwest and the MAGA countryside going to resist the FEMA camps if they are led by Trump?

FEMA camps is a euphemism for early 2000s American conspiracism about the rise of fascism.

But in any case, in case you're autistic, in any case, um

You know, uh absolutely, they are using Trump.

And we n we we you should not make the same mistake that retarded leftists did in twenty sixteen and make this about Trump.

That is a very that is a w a Freudian war you will not win.

You will not win that war by rebelling against the father, but you will win a war of fighting against.

a oligarchy.

And that's what the truth is.

Th this is about an oligarchy taking hold.

I'm not talking about the billionaires from Silicon Valley only, although they're a huge factor in this.

If you look at America's

Economic hegemony.

It's major business leaders and corporations, they are all kind of kissing the ring right now and they're unifying under this new hegemony.

The good news is that the old liberal hegemony is dead and we don't really need to bother with it anymore.

The pink hair Hitlerism is kind of dead.

Now we have ordinarily black haired Hitlerism.

Basically

Uh no longer do we have to point out the transgender Hitlerites.

We can now contend ourselves with fighting cisgendered Hitlerites, a word I don't like using, but whatever.

Um

But that is the truth.

That is the situation we're dealing with.

All of those they them are.

Getting the short end of the stick, so to speak.

There's no need to kick a dead horse.

Those are now just mental asylum patients who are losing their minds and spiraling into insanity, and they have no significance as political actors in the years to come.

They will have no political significance.

These people are depressed, they are mentally unwell, and they are retired.

They're bowed out of politics.

They have exhausted their significance and utility for the ruling elites.

And now we have to get serious and realize that these people are not really going to be.

The most brutal and and and and um vicious threat we're gonna have to face now.

Now things are gonna get serious.

They were used and duped and manipulated by the Democratic Party.

They were cast aside very quickly, and that's the end of it.

Um I need people to also understand that anyone calling themselves a communist who at this point is

Openly against our party, the American Communist Party, those are just mentally ill people.

They are no different than furries, they are no different than other strange and bizarre LARPers who don't understand the time period in which we're living, but they are not serious communists.

I know that I'm a very silly person, and I have done very silly things in the past, especially in the beginning of infrared, but those were things that were done

Um, you know, as me as an online entertainer, um, I guess, but they were not like.

They were not forms of delusion.

Okay, s s call them what you want, but it wasn't delusion.

I knew exactly.

What it was, you know, it was literally just doing whatever the fuck I needed to do to get viral, right?

But

These people are

mentally disturbed, mentally psychotic people and um

They're done, it's over.

But instead of focusing on them and this is in spirit with what I've been doing, by the way, instead of tearing those people down, which they don't need to be torn down, they're already down, we should build up a new, positive, serious and modernized comprehension of Marxism-Leninism.

In the twenty-first century, and just raise our red flag on the highest hill, and don't worry about these strange other people.

And we need to seize hegemony, you know?

And that's the point.

We need to seize hij uh communist to Germany, so to speak.

Um, that's the point, okay?

It's very simple.

Um

The incoming administration is not going to be scary.

I want everyone to understand there's a steady line going up in the direction of fascist dictatorship.

Under Biden, it was going in the same direction.

Under Trump, it will continue to go in the same direction.

It is being justified differently.

It is being.

Expressed and and displayed differently, but it is the same line because the agenda of the Deep State is in decades and they know what they're doing and it's not an accident and they're not improvising and it's an agenda that is being fulfilled by so many different means and by so many different kinds of actors.

Actors in this case, both in the sense of performance actors and actors in the sense of, you know.

I don't know, like network theory or whatever.

Whatever you'd fucking use this in.

Agents, sense of agency.

Um.

But in any case, um

Yes, we are now under a Trump administration and um

We have significant challenges ahead, but

We absolutely cannot make the same mistakes as the retarded leftists after 2016.

That much is certain.

We are not here to sensationalize, we are not here to.

abuse the word fascism because there's two kinds of anti-fascism, so to speak.

The Antifa post twenty sixteen was an infantile kind of he uh incredibly psychological thing

That was a psychosexual nonsense type of Antifa.

The psychosexual Antifa, so to speak, which is influenced by Frankfurt School and other kind of retards, was very much a way of people

For people to have a subjectivistic comprehension of fascism that was based on being mean and hurting my feelings and doing this and doing that.

Whereas today, the kind of anti-fascism we need to develop and strengthen in this administration

Is one that's based in a long-term view, one that's based in an impersonal and objective comprehension, similar to the anti-fascism of the Comintern during the Popular Front period, one that comprehends fascism not in psychosexual terms, but in terms of militarism and the consolidation of dictatorial power by the financial and imperialist bourgeoisie at the expense of our constitutional rights and enumerated rights and liberties and the sovereignty of our republic.

That is the kind of anti-fascism we need to develop and articulate.

Not the kind that is Orange Man Bad and Cheeto Mussolini.

That is completely unserious nonsense, and you're going to lose that battle, by the way.

Nothing was a better gift.

To the right, than how leftists were acting after 2016.

It was

It was spelled out in the heavens and in the stars.

Um also we have to have a anti-fascism that is based in the labor movement.

And real anti-fascism has nothing to do with

You know, um

Trying to censor and whatever.

It's just about defending the sovereignty of.

The American people

And our rights are constitutionally enumerated rights.

And it's also about opposing militarism and imperialist ambitions.

That is the meaning concretely of anti fascism.

Uh we uh we we absolutely need to

Understand that um

That

And I said this before that

Uh there have been I am a Michael Hudson Marxist, so I have a very I don't just say oh, the capitalist mode of production, there there there are no kind of meta-historical realities.

No, I do think there are.

And one of those metahistorical react realities are two

Moments across history that I think are significant.

One is the rise of Greek antiquity.

And the other is the rise of um

Of early modernity and mercantilism and the transatlantic slave trade and so on.

And oh, there's three: Greek antiquity, the collapse of the Roman Empire, and the rise of early modern Western colonialism.

So, and I think we're at the fourth, we're at a fourth turning point.

So, what do I mean by this?

It's very simple.

Um

When how this happens, we can talk about I have my Fisherman theory that you guys may be familiar with.

Um for my upcoming book.

But in any case

When fishermen or pirates

Discover

Debt or usury or interest.

If you don't know what the fisherman theory, the fisherman theory is based on a investigation I did where I discovered these strange coincidences about how Pacific Northwest tribes in the United States, Pacific Northwest tribes in the Americas, as well as I think they're called the Calusa people in Florida, as well as the Greeks and various other examples I found where for some reason coastal, primarily fisher, fish-based peoples discover a very brutal form of slavery and usury combined, right?

That is, I have more thoughts on that and I have more discoveries on that front, but I'm not going to talk about them.

Also, yes, the Vikings and Britain and so on and so on.

But in any whereas uh telluric peoples kind of have um a more uh the Michael Hudson cyclical and dynastic uh cy uh cycle of debt forgiveness where they're reining in on usurious oligarchs and and therefore institutions of slavery don't become as strong.

But in any case, okay, we will solve that, okay?

Um

But this is stuff for my research uh and whatever.

But um with the assuming that background

The rise of a usurious oligarchy

led to these insurmountable debts and debt obligations.

Which created a circumstance of de facto slavery.

Where peoples had to start pledging their lands, their children, their own labor as collateral.

When faced with insurmountable debts.

Now I think that's where we are right now, a stage of insurmountable sorry, a state of de facto slavery for many American citizens.

Um but that was in a background of the of early antiquity.

Then with the rise of uh Solon, we had the debt forgiveness from Solon, right?

Solon reforms.

The debts were wiped, land was re redistributed and restored, and that is a that kind of seemed like similar to the pattern of of Bronze Age palatial um civil economies and civilizations, where that was a cyclical thing and it accompanied the rise of new dynasties and and and new concentrations of power.

But

When debt is cancelled.

It doesn't automatically mean that slavery is gone.

In fact, one of the ways that debt can be canceled is by turning debtor obligations into formal institutions of slavery.

Slaves are not debtors.

A slave

In terms of the balance sheet, has no debts.

They are a slave.

So that was, so in Greek antiquity,

Debts were wiped in Solon's reforms, for example, but the debts were redenominated into a political obligation of bondage.

That being slavery, property, private property was redenominated, so to speak, so as to include human beings and human labor in some way or another, restricting it and bonding it, right?

Creating relationships of domination and servitude, and literally slavery.

And the Greeks did this and they created these slave-based mode of a slave-based mode of production which they utilized to plunder um

to plunder the well, so to speak, the Persian Empire, right?

Alexander the Great and the Greeks are credited for a great deal, but they were plunderers.

They basically embarked upon militaristic aggression in order to um as their principal means of accumulation.

Because once they turned these debt debtor-creditor relations into formal obligations foreigners and and and um

I need to clarify something.

One of the ways in which

The basis of the slave economies was piracy and warfare, right?

So this is how they got and imported slaves.

It wasn't from Greeks themselves who were former debtors, those people were freed.

But the institution, an institution of slavery arose as a consequence.

Um

of of the debt being forgiven because it was just institutionalized into an obligation of bondage

And that uh basically

Drove Greece into a militaristic expansionism that was predatory and based in piracy and plunder, right?

And that culminates in the rise of Alexander the Great, quote unquote.

I don't think he was so great.

And he they basically plundered and devastated these actual, like,

um self-sustaining civilizations in Egypt and and Persia.

Well, it was all the Persian Empire, but they were centers of civilization, Babylon and so on and so on.

And they recovered, of course, from it.

They recovered.

Uh in the in the so-called period of Hellenism.

Well, not so called.

It was a kind of Hellenistic period.

But

They recovered, uh but nonetheless that severely set them back, in my view.

It set them back.

Okay, so another example of this is the collapse of the Roman Empire, which collapsed and and and basically

One of the huge factors behind that collapse was the insurmountability of debts.

The Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire dealt with that in different ways.

But in both cases the debts

Um the clearing of debt was dealt with in different ways.

In the Eastern Roman Empire

Freehold labor became the foundation of the economy.

rather than slavery or servitude.

Freehold.

So people that

had land and could live off land, and it was theirs and well, it was all actually the Emperor's land.

There was no private property, so to speak.

But, you know, they were free.

They were free men who lived off the land.

Or they were at least as free as anyone else was.

Right?

In the Western Roman Empire, usurious oligarchs um took power and they propped up various different um

warlords to act as their their hired thugs.

Even, I don't want to be blasphemous, but there was a period in which the popes were direct during the pornocracy, right?

The popes were directly.

Um chosen by creditors.

And during this period we saw another institution of bondage and domination arise, which was another way of formalizing debtor obligations, which was serfdom.

That was serfdom.

Okay.

Um.

So that just formalized it.

Fast forward, you know, the Renaissance, the early modern period, the same story repeats, the same cycle, so to speak, repeats.

Militaristic expansionism, plundering of Ah uh this uh okay, where wh what's the militaristic expansionism and plundering in the case of the rise of serfdom and uh feudalism?

It was the Crusades.

So that was the Crusade.

So Alexander the Great's conquest, the Crusades, we're kind of dealing with similar threads here, right?

Then the early modern period, uh it's the same story, right?

The insurmountability of debts turn into.

Obligations of bondage.

And we have the rise of a new institution.

Now, not chattel slavery, but wage slavery, right?

That wage slavery was a consequence of.

The insurmountability of debts for freehold peasants in Europe who had to have their lands pledged as collateral and that that that gave rise to the proletarian class as we know it, right?

Fast forwarding a lot and I'm skipping a lot.

Basically, I think we are

The the the the possibility that we're entering a fourth, you know, um

Fourth, playing out of this

is is very real.

Like um

I want you guys to imagine a scenario.

What if?

One of the ways the debt crisis is solved solved is

is let's say you're in debt and you're an American citizen.

What if Doge or Trump or whatever, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and Mark Andreessen and these fuckers in Silicon Valley what if they're like, okay, here's your New Deal, Americans.

All your debts will be forgiven, but you have to trade in your first citizenship.

They're going to have different tiers of citizenship.

So you're a first citizen.

You're allowed to vote.

You have all these liberties and rights.

You're going to be kind of a secondary citizen, just like an H-1B visa.

Okay?

And in return for all your debts being wiped, and in exchange for economic relief and support, you just have to trade your political rights.

You just have to trade your citizenship, so to speak.

I think that because human beings are human beings for whom survival, immediate survival is the primary concern, I think that's going to be a very popular thing, so to speak.

Not popular in terms of people like it, but in terms of I think faced with that choice, people will trade in their liberties and their rights for immediate relief, which they need fucking desperately.

And we're going to see American citizens be degraded into like H-1B visa people, right?

But

Um but they're going to get economic relief and they're going to have all their debts cleared.

And that is something, something like that, I think we're going to see.

Definitely.

I absolutely think part of the reconstitution of the United States of America and these fuckers in Silicon Valley, look, from what I know, these people in Silicon Valley, you know, it's not just Curtis Yarvin.

They they have this view that human beings are not equal, fundamentally.

And they really believe in this IQ stuff.

And it's not just racial.

A lot of people, you know, the problem with stupid pretend anti-fascists is they didn't understand the unique kind of fascistic thing that's rising.

They just assumed it was all racial.

It's not a racial thing primarily, right?

Um.

Or at least in their vision it's not.

They don't care about white nationalism.

The the Silicon Valley elites are not white nationalists.

They have this kind of technocratic view that human beings are not equal and it's based in this idea of that human beings are like computers and some people have good chips and some people have bad CPUs, right?

Just like g graphics cards or whatever, right?

And for them, the biggest problem is political equality.

They said, why should there be political equality?

Elite human capital should be able to be entitled to more rights than the trash, bio-trash.

So they have this kind of caste system id and they are directly influenced by some type of Hinduism.

Literally, that's why we're seeing such a prominence of that, by the way, in the coming administration, because they just think that, you know, we need to kind of have a feudal caste system type of thing.

And don't underestimate it, because it can be combined with for them for technocracy.

And they basically want to, um,

They want to like make it a a technology thing.

Like, oh yeah, you're gonna have, you know, you're gonna be biometrically scanned and you're gonna have an IQ test AI detector, and that's gonna determine your political rights and whatever.

And they are totally all in on doing this, but they just know it's so deeply scary and unpopular to the sheepish masses.

So, what they've been doing over the past 10 years.

Is they've drip they've been drip feeding it.

And as soon as these Silicon Valley guys got the opportune, look, this whole thing about wokeness, it was all a con, it was all a hoax.

Okay, they created wokeness as a boogeyman, as a straw man, all the worst excesses of which they created and were responsible for, only so that they can sneak in this much more sinister agenda so they could actually normalize their fascistic plans.

without any left wing resistance.

And they know how deeply unpopular and contentious anything like this will be for the American public.

So they're trying as much as they can to sneak it in.

Okay, they're trying to sneak it in.

And one of the ways they're trying to sneak it in is racial division.

You know, if you got stupid people like, oh, I'm white, I'm gonna be on the top race, or people fighting over race, that's one of the ways they can sneak this in.

But make no mistake, they have this plan.

And I thought about something.

I saw how there's all these executive orders to empower Silicon Valley elites, like Doge, for example, with the ability to control all the government software.

Think about this.

If they control all the government software.

Wouldn't they be able to do a coup anytime they wanted?

If you control the means of communication, you control the means of organization, you control everything.

And then think about these people.

They're defense contractors.

These people are military contractors.

I mean, the military is going to these people, right?

To get their weapons technologies.

So these guys have a backdoor access to the fucking military, too.

You know?

And who the fuck are these people?

They're really glowy.

They're really fucking weird.

And they are from the Anglo-Saxon Atlanticist deep state.

Or sorry, elites.

And these bloodlines are super weird when you start tracing them and looking at them.

But they are being given immense control, okay?

Crazy levels of control.

And it is undermining our sovereignty as a republic, okay?

I like free speech.

I like that there's free speech on X, but.

Are we just going to trust them to maintain our constitution and our I w I don't it's not how it works, okay?

It's not a benevolent oligarchy, it's supposed to be a sovereign republic.

And um

You know, uh you guys gotta understand something else, which is that

They um

They don't believe in Republican values.

Some say, oh, they're monarchists.

Not really, not in the traditionalist sense of the word.

They are feudalists, okay?

They want to turn us into slaves.

Or some of us.

And by the way, how do you debunk it or whatever?

It's just kind of simple.

Like

Imagine the fucking arrogance of the dipshit academics and fucking elites like retard Steven Pinker and all these other fucking retards.

And and and their elite status is now going to be institutionalized and they're going to be fucking higher tiers of citizens than the rest of us.

Fuck you, I'll debate any of these people and wipe the floor with them, right?

No, it's the principle that matters.

Only God knows our soul.

You can't fucking sit here and rank people and worship.

You don't know what people's potential is.

You don't know if someone's just a fucking retarded blowhard and gotten to a top position because they're a bullshitter.

And you don't know if somebody who's in a low position, you don't know these things, right?

But in any case, I'm just telling you what we're faced, we're headed with, and what we're headed for, it seems like.

And I knew this, I've known this for over a decade.

It's just, I really shelved this because I was just like, wait a second.

I thought this was going to be Trump 1.0.

That's how paranoid I was.

It's not.

Trump 1.0 was totally clueless.

But this one, this new thing, this is really where.

Yeah, I mean, I feel like.

I was wrong the first time, but now I'm actually right, you know, about everything I thought would happen.

Corvid, I pre and this shit sounds out of this world and it sounds too crazy to believe, but I think people are so desperate economically right now.

And I think there is a history of turning people into property.

You can sell or or buy human beings or whatever, like in serfdom and slavery and shit.

Like that is a hist there's historical precedent for that and there's no reason to assume something like that can't re-emerge in the digital age.

Um

So that is just a crazy black pill.

Or you could see it as a black pill, or you could fucking grow up and you could see it as, hey, this is gonna define the struggle to come.

We have to defend our freedom and sovereignty.

We have to defend the revolution of 1776.

We have to defend, you know.

We have to defend, you know, as free people.

Our rights, we have to it's it's literally freedom or slavery, you know?

It's a f and that was never free, by the way.

Um

But in any case

Uh

I think that

It's very creepy.

There will be a reconstitution of the United States of America.

It's very simple.

With new calls for the acquisition of territories, with the new nature of the governance that's going on right now, that's not going to it's only a matter of time before it starts clashing with the Constitution.

It's only a matter of time before it starts disrupting the norms of governance and the procedures and formalities of governance.

It's only a matter of time before there's a constitutional crisis.

I can guarantee you that the United States is going to be reconstituted into something else.

And um

You we better have a fucking plan, guys.

When I say that, I mean you better be in our fucking party, the American Communist Party, because they have a fucking plan, okay?

They've had a plan for decades.

They're just like we have a plan for 2036, they have a plan and they're implementing their plan very effectively.

You saw how Elon Musk looked, he's doing his Hitler salute.

They are on course and on track for what they've been planning, and yes, they've been planning it for a long time.

Okay, we have to have a fucking plan too, and we do.

But this isn't the era of running your fucking mouth on Twitter without a plan, without an intention.

This is an era of you're going to be part of a plan one way or another.

So choose your plan.

You choose the people's plan or the creepy fucking Nazi pedophile elites plan.

Very simple choice, in my opinion.

But these retards running their mouths, individualistic retards running their mouths, experiencing a false...

I'm just sharing my opinion.

You better have a fucking plan about what is the purpose of this opinion you're sharing?

What's the point?

Like, what plan is it serving?

What agenda is it fulfilling?

No, just me ex Fuck your self-expression.

Fuck your individuality on the internet.

There's no such thing.

You wanna be an individual?

Go to a fucking park.

Walking your dog

To be an individual.

The the cyberspace, battle space, it's not the place for individual creativity and self-expression.

Sorry, nobody gives a fuck.

You better have an agenda and a plan.

that you're trying to fulfill and and a premeditated goal.

You wanna fucking go and and just show your face?

Go outside and and bother the public on the sidewalk.

Not me, by the way.

I don't respect anyone who doesn't have a plan.

What do I mean by a plan?

I don't necessarily mean you have to calculate everything or know everything, but just have an agenda.

Like if you're an artist, for example, have an artistic vision in your head.

Every great artist had a vision in their head.

But there's some idiots that think they could just turn on the camera and smile and that's enough.

It's not enough.

Nobody gives a fuck about you individually.

We wanna know what plan and agenda you have.

Again, the agenda doesn't need to be like rationally calculated, but it it does need to have this aspect of hypermodernity, where you're projecting a vision or something that you see in the future and you are now on track to realizing it.

You know?

That's what a plan is.

You want to be just an individual?

You want to just be I want to just do self-expression.

Jennifer, appreciate you.

And you know, look, that's what a cult is.

A cult, as they use it and abuse this word, it's just a plan.

Like, we have an agenda and a purpose behind what we're doing.

We're not just doing it freely.

Yeah.

By freely you mean unintelligently, without any known purpose and just for the sake of putting ourselves out there just because we what?

We're lonely.

Give me a fucking break.

If you're lonely, don't fucking go on the internet and and and run your mouth.

There are sharks swimming in these waters who literally want to kill you, okay?

Um, go make friends in real life, sh frankly, you know, if that's if that's what you're motivated by.

Um yeah, in any case.

Um

In any case

Like

There's

Again, I'm not saying you have to have a political agenda.

I'm not saying you always have to have like an agenda that's rationally premeditated or or or um you know methodically laid out where it's like deceptive.

I'm just saying like have a fucking vision and an idea of like okay, this is the goal.

It's bigger than me here right now.

It's in the future.

You know, every great artist had that.

Even if you're an artist, they have a plan.

But the era of classical modernity is classical modernity was literally when retards with top hats and monocles were just strolling the streets.

I am here to express my individual opinion.

And they had like those fucking sticks that they walked with and they had, we are, I have a son.

We're not living in that era no more, okay?

We don't have top hats.

We don't have any of that.

We are all in the flux in this hyper modernity.

We're all, it's competing trajectories and velocities and like intensities.

You know, like there's no.

When when you

Put yourself out there.

You're already fucking part of a force.

You're already part of like you're on the trains going somewhere already.

You know?

Things are already in fucking motion.

You know, you get on board or you get out of the fucking way.

You roll with it or you fucking back out.

But you're not just sitting there with a top hat being an individual, all right?

Like the future is here and it's realizing itself in real time, hypertime, immediately, okay?

You need to choose your future.

And get with it, and that's a plan, and that already happened.

But individual immediacy, where I am just here now and the only thing going on is me sharing my opinion, that is not possible in the era we live in.

Back in the day people used to like write in newspapers and even when they would talk

On what were they co the talkies?

Good morning, Britain, we are here with a Or they would talk through radio or television.

But it was all like

one sided.

Nobody could respond in real time.

Now we have live streams where the chat can literally I could tell the chat Gorillas and Sons right now.

It's an immediate, instant response.

That fundamentally makes it impossible for me to say that this is just my individuality.

You see this response with these fucking sun gorillas?

Like

That they just responded to me right now.

You know?

Like, that's no longer just me anymore.

There's an input, there's an output.

It's a feedback loop.

The consequences of showing your fucking face and talking in public are now.

So you need to have a plan.

That's

Fenrig, that's why nobody buys it when you have these undisciplined idiots just running their mouth in public, attacking party members or leaders.

You know, oh, nobody, nobody respects it because what's your fucking plan here?

What's your agenda here?

Am I not allowed to share my opinion?

I am just on the town square sharing my opinion.

No, you're not, motherfucker.

Everybody has a plan.

Everybody has an agenda.

And if you don't know what yours is, you're just an idiot.

Because you have one anyway.

You're serving one anyway, you know?

Um, there's always you need to always be mindful of the consequences.

Like, what are you actually trying to communicate and for what purpose?

What are you communicating is always what you need to keep in mind.

What are you communicating?

And what do I mean by what are the consequences of what you're communicating?

In a sense, it's like Kojev is correct in some sense, right?

Boris Groys is correct in some sense.

The thing you're communicating is the end goal.

I get that.

I'm not a Vulgarian who thinks language is a tool to realize the vulgar, you know, pleasures of our sensibilities.

That's disgusting and perverted.

That amounts to the idea that like we are just motivated by sensuous input and we're just using language for s like I want Doritos, so I'm just gonna talk to people so I can have a chip bag of Doritos and feel the sensation of how tasty Doritos are.

No, I think just like Stalin thought, the meaningfulness of language and communication is the kingdom of ends.

I understand that.

Just like Boris Groy said in the Communist Post script.

But be mindful.

Of the extent of what you're communicating.

Like you're not just communicating something in isolation.

What you are communicating in within a framework of the ultimate meaningfulness of what you're saying.

What du what are you trying to really communicate?

That's what I mean by have a plan.

What is the ultimate thing you're trying to communicate?

The ultimate thing.

Always just be mindful of that.

You know?

Fuck, there's like a fly here.

The Costco strike, we're on top of it.

It's just this stupid shit disrupting us purposefully, but it's alright.

Um

You absolutely always need to consider that.

I rarely actually look at my camera.

Let me fix it.

Here we are.

Anyway.

Back to chat.

Um

So these are some updates.

When will I finish my book?

Uh hmm.

I want to get back on track with my book in February.

I won't be able to

For the ni for the I I'm writing something else between now and the end of the month for the journal.

And I'm also working on other I'm going to be focussed on the recruitment drive and stuff, so I I'm not going to be able to get to it this month, but I'm hoping February I'll have enough time.

Actually.

Hopefully in February I'll be able to I really I really want nothing else than to get back to my book.

I think about it every second of every single day.

Um that book is my heart and soul is still in that book and I I need to get back to it.

It's w it's calling me, you know.

And I I'm always thinking about it, and I'm always so excited about it.

And how much is going to change things?

It's it's not fiction.

The book is also an anthology, but it's an anthology with a central story.

That is the main chapters is this central book, and then in between the chapters this there's these related writings.

and lectures.

But it's uh that's why it's gonna be so big.

You know, it's gonna be like one chapter and then pause, read this lecture or or this other writing to get you thinking and it so it's very dialectical.

Like you

Yeah.

Pages, it's gonna be six hundred minimum.

It's gonna be six hundred minimum.

Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope.

There will be no um deep investigation into economics or tech bros.

Because that will be my second book, which will be about capital and stuff.

This one is um about politics.

Who's that in the picture?

That is William Z.

Foster.

William Z.

Foster.

I haven't started the economics one.

Yeah, uh that's super

Sad.

Uh hold on, let me check something.

Fuck.

Second.

Right.

I think that the main subject of our party activity is going to be focusing on the constitutional crisis to come.

And that's all I'm going to say for now.

But it's not that we're going to start that crisis or we're going to be the troublemakers behind it, but we are here to respond to extraordinary circumstances.

And that is what we are buil uh keep that goal in mind.

It's always about building the foundations of something that can weather the storm to come and survive.

It is

infuriating that some people

would put their personal grievances.

if that's true with me, for whatever reason, by the way,

We that and d they don't have the long term persp that we need an organization that's going to survive this.

Individuals are not going to survive the crisis to come.

Well, th they'll survive, I guess, but they won't have an ability to have any voice

or sovereignty or anything.

But that's personal grievance wasn't the motivating factor.

The motivating factor was, in all likelihood, outside.

It's just like Dan Cohen said, it's classic coin tool pro shit.

It's crazy to see it in real time.

Uh we do plan to address the annexation stuff.

Actually, Sankaras, we absolutely do.

William Jennings, thank you so much, brother.

We are primarily concerned about Green uh sorry, not Greenland, Panama.

And Mexico.

Um, especially Mexico, frankly.

They are planning, I think, f military intervention into Mexico on under the pretext of fighting the cartels, and we are deeply, deeply concerned about that.

Uh the annexations

Um

I will give you the basic I'll give you my view basically.

Blackwood, appreciate you with the five.

Thank you.

My view more or less on the question of annexations is that.

The violation of people's sovereignty is a violation of our sovereignty.

The same mechanisms that are used to stamp on the sovereignty of others corrodes and undermines our sovereignty.

So the fundamental question for me is sovereignty.

It's not

That is front and center, what are the consequences for sovereignty?

Because what it seems like will happen with annexations is that extra legal, extra sovereign forms of power will arise.

that are not accountable to us,

The people, the American people.

If we the American people and the people of Canada are to become one people, we need to have a shared sovereignty.

We need to have a clear sovereignty.

We don't have that in America right now.

We have vestiges of popular sovereignty, but I feel like the annexations will accelerate the corrosion of sovereignty and the implementation of this weird feudal thing that they're planning.

So these are the primary concerns.

In principle, of course, we consider Canada to be part of the same country as the United States, and our party has formalized that fact, but that doesn't mean we're giving a blank check and endorsing sovere uh annexation under every possible circumstance.

That is far from the case.

So no one should make the assumption that we are just going to automatically support Canadian annexation, no matter what the conditions and circumstances are, because that's not true.

We take seriously the question of sovereignty because

You know, we are part of the Marxist-Leninist tradition.

We understand the importance of the democratic I know it's a cringe word, but the democratic revolution, the democratic struggle.

That is a fundamental premise and foundation of proletarian class struggle.

I think the infrared deep state position on Omlo and Morena is very positive.

Uh we think that Mexico

should build and deepen its independent state tradition.

Um

and resist at by any means

Uh encroachments by the uh

by the US government and the military.

Mexico should firmly stand strong in defending its sovereignty and independence.

Why is that important, by the way?

It's the same reason.

Should we be concerned about intervention into Canada?

Not necessarily, but neither the opposite position.

We need to have a clearer idea of what that looks like and under what circumstances and so on and so on.

And the geopolitics of it are paramount.

They're paramount.

I will give you uh my position on Mexico.

Um

Mexico, in some sense, is more advanced than the USA politically, in that the Mexican Revolution of 1911.

they have a deeper revolutionary tradition than we do.

But that doesn't mean Mexico has more advanced productive forces or relations of production, but it does have an advanced American revolutionary state tradition.

That state tradition should be defended just as much as we defend the revolution of 1776.

That is why we care about Cuban and Mexican and so on sovereignty and Venezuelan and Bolivarian sovereignty.

If we are Pan Americans and we envision the dream of a great Pan American superstate one day, maybe, right?

It has to be on the basis of affirming the independent revolutionary traditions of all constituent nations.

Because stomping on and erasing even one, that would be like us stomping on and erasing Lincoln or seventeen seventy six.

And we reject that.

So that is the consistent Pan American view.

The consistent Pan American view is no revolutionary traditions should be liquidated or erased.

And so on.

That is notwithstanding upholding the principle of national self determination, which we also support.

But even if we brushed that aside and said yes, we want a Pan American continental superstate, that is another reason why you should oppose US interventionism in Mexico, Cuba and so on and so on.

Uh why do we support Puerto Rican independence?

Because Puerto Rico is a colony and it's a territory.

And as such that

Colonial relationship

undermines the sovereign nature, the popular, democratic sovereign nature of state power for us here.

We reject any colonies, we reject any territory territories, we reject any distinctions in citizenship.

So they say, why don't you just support annexation?

And turning Puerto Rico into the fifty-first state.

Well, because, um

Because the people of Puerto Rico have already their own Democratic-Republican national tradition that they've been struggling for for decades and decades and decades.

That is part of their history and their tradition.

And annexation would erase that.

It would be an affront to that.

All the sacrifices and struggle for that would be in vain, right?

So we reject that, erasing that and stomping on that.

So it's not because we want to divide.

Or make America small, it's because the question of sovereignty is what's paramount for us.

Um

So it's um

Really that simple.

Mm.

Banana, appreciate you, man.

Arkansas with the twenty-five.

Wow.

Thank you so much.

Appreciate you so much.

Thank you.

I think also guys the the Arkansas thank you so much man by the way.

Um

He is on the media team.

He does incredible work.

Credible work for the party.

But um

The question of sovereignty is is also one of the reasons for the book I.

That's going to be important is it's it needs to be correctly understood why that's important and what that is.

What is sovereignty?

What does it mean for a people to be united with a state?

What does it mean for a people to be free and independent?

And a state to be independent and free.

Yosef, what's up, you know?

And in the bourgeois conception, this is just about, you know, like will.

Yosef, and in the bourgeois, I'll just give you a sneak peek.

In the bourgeois view,

It's always a question of will and voluntarism.

We choose to enter into association ex nihilo, right?

But the materialist view regards will not as an exceptional uh thing,

But as a determination, right?

So if you comprehend the will as a determination already, like

You know, uh my life, my mode of production, my way of life, right?

For example, these are examples of determinations.

Um

then uh i i then um also the question of sovereignty is different, right?

Because um the state reflects, for example, the interests of specific classes that already exist, not

uh the the will of of of individuals deciding that this is what they want from scratch.

But the state is a reflection of what they are already.

So it's it's a determination, right?

So this is, for example, the more materialist and Marxist comprehension of sovereignty.

Um

That's why we should re-examine.

The Marxist-Leninist view about

The democratic struggle.

Um

I'm not saying cast it aside or revise it.

I'm saying we need to properly examine it.

Because, for example, I'll give you an example.

Take Russia.

In Russia's case,

Liberal democracy, as in George Soros's Open Society, is a step backward from Putin's authoritarian, illiberal a democratic system.

Why is Russia sovereign?

Well, because

The interests and the determination of the Russian people is given expression in Putin.

Uh correctly, right?

In some way or another.

But this is not so for the dictatorship that is taking hold in the United States, which is here to formalize debts, to create distinctions in ranks and citizenship.

And um

To formalize debtor obligations into political obligations, I mean.

Um

A dictatorship against

the American people, as a weapon to hold over them, to enforce the will of creditors against them.

So that's a difference.

You know, we need to comprehensively examine that.

And understand that we should not fall into the error of the CPUSA and other revisionists and Euro communist trash, according to which liberal democracy is what we mean by democracy.

The democratic struggle is not the struggle for liberal democracy.

The meaning of democracy does not mean liberal or neoliberal democracy.

Democracy is populism.

Democracy is the popular struggle, the demos struggle, the sofianic struggle, if you want.

That's the democratic struggle.

In Marxism.

The freeholders' struggle for land.

So that people can be really on an equal footing.

The liberal democratic struggle is about establishing institutions.

In my view, this is as simple as this: our stance toward Trump.

should be not a defense of liberal democracy against Trump's or not Trump's, but the new fascism.

We cannot defend liberal democracy.

So we need to forward and advance a proletarian democracy

Yeah.

Um, new democracy, for example, as qualitatively more advanced than the fascism.

We should not see if there's anything you could critique the popular front strategy for in the 1930s, which was not universally a success, especially wasn't in Europe, France.

It was a total failure in France.

And it also failed in Spain.

It's because there was this notion that we just need to defend the existing bourgeois institutions from fascism.

And that view.

That failed, but in China Spartacus thanks but in China it didn't fail.

Why did it not fail in China?

Because China didn't have any de bourgeois democratic institutions to defend.

So China was able to skip that and just have a new democracy, a proletarian conception of democracy that it could forward in contradistinction to the KMT's fascism, for example, right?

Or the Japanese imperialists.

So that's why in China the Popular Front strategy alone really was successful.

Because in Europe they were defending these this decrepit, historically outmoded historical form, which was bourgeois democracy, liberal democracy.

Whereas we need to advance and forward a qualitatively new kind of democracy which inherits and integrates the best achievements of liberal and bourgeois democracy, but is not limited by them.

So this is my view, and this is why we should.

Accept Putin as an example of democratic sovereignty.

Putin's illiberalism is more advanced historically than liberal democracy and more progressive.

From a Marxist point of view.

Um

So that's why I'm not quick to jump the gun and join the resistance against Trump ever.

Because it's clear that liberal democracy is outmoded.

But I'm not saying fascism dictatorship is coming just because of that fact.

I'm saying fascist dictatorship is coming.

Because

The contradictions within liberal democracy propel it in that direction.

F D R was an illiberal leader, by the way.

And he was good.

FDR was more progressive than that was a progressive development in the history of politics.

But the fascist dictatorship is not going to be strongman politics.

It's going to be a feudalistic oligarchy, a neo-feudal oligarchy, that is using Trump as a showman puppet to dictatorially enforce its interests at the expense of the rest of us.

And that's what we need to be vigilant toward.

But we simultaneously cannot.

Retreat and mount a defense of the liberal and bourgeois institutions, because they themselves are what had given rise to this.

So that is my view.

Um, frankly.

Anyway, guys, it was a great stream.

Be vigilant.

Something may be coming tomorrow or this week.

Oh yeah, th th there's this new organization, by the way.

It's kinda funny.

They call themselves the All Empire Workers League.

Uh be and they're getting that, I think, from the All Union

Prefix or whatever.

They don't understand the all-union thing that was for the USSR.

You're not supposed to recognize the Empire, you fucking idiots.

You're not supposed to recognize the empire formally.

Just like you don't recognize Israel or any other kind of put it it's as stupid as as imagine you're living in Nazi Germany and you go, We're gonna form the All-Reich Workers League.

No, you don't recognize the Reich, you recognize Germany and a free democratic German republic because that's the form of national sovereignty you regard as historically legitimate.

If you regard the Third Reich as historically illegitimate, you're not putting it in your fucking name of your party.

They're like, well, that's our reality.

Even if that's what you think, your party's name should never recognize a historically illegitimate formation or state power or reality.

So the all empires, whatever, they're literally like endorsing the annexation of Canada and this tech this t North American technate or whatever it was called.

And it's dialectics they they think they're opposing that thing, but by thinking you're opposing it, you're actually affirming it and giving it legitimacy.

You're literally legitimizing it.

It's like recognizing Israel.

You don't recognize Israel.

You call it the Zionist entity, for example.

Um, if you think that America needs to divide into a bunch of ethno-states of oppressed nations, then you should have a party that says, for example, we're the Navajo Workers' Party or we're the Black People Workers' Party or whatever, right?

The Mexican worker, or they don't believe in Mexico, whatever.

In any case, you don't put in the fucking name all Empire.

I mean, it sounds kind of cool, even, frankly.

It sounds fucking cool.

That's what I hate.

It does.

It's like the all empire workers.

It sounds fucking like Eura it sounds Eurasianist.

It's cool.

It's ambitious, it's like all this land for the communistic t I like that.

It's just that's not what they intend on and they look stupid.

But I don't like it like formally because no, you can't annex can't you can't annex uh Mexico, but I like it artistically, like it's kind of cool, but in a meme way.

But they don't know what they're doing, and I think they're already splitting.

They're already like splitting, by the way.

They're all they're they're they're see, this is what's pissing me off.

Like, I observing this rise of this new org.

And they're already tearing each other's heads off and it's like holy fuck give give us some fucking credit at the ACP.

They're like six months in.

Yeah Because that they don't even have a Communist Party yet.

They have a plenary organization.

We wanna for the constitution of a Communist Party.

They're already splitting and they haven't even launched yet.

We

Have launched everything we've made it this far, and yeah, two people soyed out because the feds got to them in all likelihood.

That's not a big deal, all right?

It's crazy we made it this far.

If you can make it this far, you can make it years, all right?

The hard part is over.

I'm telling you these guys guys there are literal anti-ACP organizations that form all the time online and they are always splitting.

Like after a week.

Remember the Pat Sox account?

Remember Pat Sock Moments?

Remember that account?

Do you know what happened to that account?

We didn't report it.

We didn't master it.

They deleted their account because they had a split, because it was collectively run.

And they had a fucking split so that it was gone.

These, even when they create organizations solely dedicated to shitting on us and attacking us, they don't have the fucking discipline.

To even stay and uh to to to to to to to exist.

They're that individualistic.

Like, the whole point, they're individualists and they're attacking us because we're proletarian collectivists.

We have to take down them.

So they form these organizations and they don't even fucking last.

Yes, that's why.

The reason you hate us is the same reason you can't even form organizations dedicated to taking us down.

Because you're a bunch of fucking idiots who don't know how to fucking organize.

If you knew how to do that, you would be following and adopting our methods because they're successful.

You wouldn't hate us.

You'd be joining us.

If you were interested and prove us wrong, go fucking organize in a way that doesn't end up doing the same shit we did.

And go grow a movement in this country that doesn't inevitably copy what we have already done that makes us a source of hatred and obsession for you.

The PSL is copying our shit in in in LA.

They're all DSA is copying our methods.

They're copying our rhetoric.

They copy us, they tail us, because our shit works.

It's the difference between success and failure.

Anyway.

If you got Alright, I don't even know if I wanna leak this.

Fuck it.

There's a group

Even John and Danny aren't united.

I shouldn't have leaked that, but it's pissing me off.

Because you called us a cult.

You said I was such a bad leader.

You formed a fucking impromptu organization and you couldn't even maintain discipline in your little fucking conspiratorial group that you formed impromptu to take us down in days.

Do you know how fucking hard it is to keep people together?

It's really hard.

You think it's easy because you're not the fucking guy in my position or with the executive board's position, but it's not easy.

It's really not, and that's proof of it.

Yes, you're going to start arguing and having disagreements even about how you take Haas down.

It should be a lesson, if you want to be collective, you have to put your stupid fucking personal bullshit feelings aside a little bit.

God, I i it's nice to get that off my chest, frankly.

It's not easy to be united, alright?

Amila, I appreciate it.

It takes fucking discipline.

These people don't have discipline.

That's why, even when they form impromptu collectives and organizations with the sole task of shitting on us and destroying us, quote unquote, they do.

By the way, I have to be completely honest.

I don't know that for a fact.

I've just heard it.

And I strongly think John is under duress and that debt.

I think this is Fed shit.

That's the only reason I wouldn't run wild with this.

Captain, that like they, you know, that it split or whatever.

Because it's like some fed shit.

I just, I don't know to what extent.

Yeah, uh i again.

Lot of speculation.

But

Even fucking feds have a hard time working together.

And they're, yeah, they have a salary and they're tasked.

Even they fucking.

He had a difficult time.

Because I think the thing with Danny is that there's a strong suspicion.

I'm not going to say there's proof, I don't know that yet.

But what I have been what I have been told is that he is like relapsing, okay?

And feds use junkies all the time.

Why?

Because in exchange for heroin, a junkie will fucking do anything.

But those people are really incompetent and really unstable.

So it doesn't mean just because you're working for feds doesn't mean you know what you're doing or you're not a fucking retard.

Far from it.

Far from it.

Anyway.

Anyway guys, we're gonna sign off.

Uh great uh stream.

I'll see you guys uh tomorrow or Thursday.

All right.

Depending on yeah, stay vigilant.

Some shit, you know, stay stay vigilant.

It's not over yet.

I'm you have a message to take away from the stream.

It's not over yet.

There's everything still there's still

They're not done, okay?

It's not over yet, all right?

Anyway, see you guys.

Stay just like I told you Sunday.

Stay ready, stay vigilant.

We're going to war.

It's war.

The camp the the the defamation campaign is just gotten started.

All right, that's what our intel has found.

So, stay vigilant, stay ready, stay posted.

I will see you guys.

See you on the other side.

Goodbye.

By that, I mean star side.