RESPONDING TO OPPOSITION

It's complicated.

It always is.

That's just the way it goes.

It feels like I waited so long for this.

I wonder if it shows

Head underwater

Now I can't breathe

It never felt so good

Because I can feel it coming over me

I wouldn't stop it if I could

Will I take over

Yeah

I know you can't deny

Will I take over

Yeah I could put this here When I take over me

I'm gonna'

Cause something's here tonight

Give me a reason

I gotta know

Do you feel it too

Can't you see me here on over?

Lord

At this time I blame you

Looking out for you

To hold my hand

It feels like I could fall

Now love me write

Like I know you can

We could lose it all

When I take so bar

Yeah

You know you can't deny

Well, I take so by

Yeah

Something's here tonight

Tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight, tonight. and I'll be loving you all the time.

It's true.

And I want to make it fly.

When love When I takes over When I takes over

When I takes over

When I takes over when I takes over

when it takes over

when it takes over

when it takes over

when it takes over

over over when I take over, over, over, over, over, over, over.

Over.

Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. Over. over over

When I take over

Oh my

When I take over

Yeah

I know you can't

I'll take

So much

Yeah I'm right so much Yeah

Because something's here to love Hold meh

Keep me Hold me fast, go not

I know's

I don't know

I'm like my love

Without you

Reckise me

I mean I

I will that it

And it's I'm going to I'm I'm I'm I'm I's I will that It's just And I'm like I feel like I feel like I feel like I'm I'm afraid All right I'm around I'm like You're playing Life's It's right I'm not But I'm I'm gonna But I'm I'm gonna I'm Let me ask me Come, my fucking stone Say me Please

But I can

again

I'm going to I'm going

I'm going

I'm going

I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going

I'm going

I'm I think I think little I'm a little bit

so you're going to

see the way of me I'm coffee all of so that

I'm

I'm I'm

and I'm

I'm

so I'm

so I'm

so I'm

like I'm don't see that

I'm

and I'm

and I'm

and I'm trying to make sure you're in the future I'm trying to say I'm sorry

I'm talking about you

I'm talking about

and you're like to

see what I'm

the other day

the people

who are the same I'm going to see that I'm to see I don't know I can't get on

my mind I'm

I'm

in the life

I'm

I'm

that's I'm

I'm I'm and I'm not so I'm going to I'm

a lot of

I'm Oh, I think so. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. Oh my Oh my six Oh I'm not you know, You know, Can you feel the fire burning?

I love the way your body feels like me.

For your touch is my lower. let me taste i want your lips for me i don't know why why you get me high high high you're so fine fine fine i'm so addicted i want to make you mind more in mind don't waste no time time time you're still fine fine fine fine

i love all you oh my mind can get you love you right don't try just let me love you right all right cause i love for you oh oh my i can't try just love you right oh i know why because i'm the thing i love you right oh right

oh oh oh oh i see what i'm a-ha-bye i'm gonna be I should I want to be

a

I'm trying

I want to

I don't need

No say

This is more than just as I have

Let me love you till I'm in too deep

I don't know

I want to I

You get me high, high, fine

There's something I'm fine, fine fine fine i'm so addicted i want to make a line one

line and want to stop time time time you're so fine fine fine fine fine fine oh I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm You want me. I be apples The Onward I Let it all

Go up in the

too soon

Oh, I know that I

Did some things

Right, but you did too

Maybe this was over

The thought that even began

Give me another seven

Don't want it out to end

Only one more moment

Even if it's pretend

Really I should become

because I know it's over now

I know it's over now

I know it's over now I know it's over now I know what's all I know I'm going to all my oh myrival

I would know I'll never know if we could

You saved it from the start

If we took it slow

With a soft to touch

But it also fall

upon

maybe it is resolved

I thought really

it began

give me a mind

a second

don't want it

to end

only one more moment

even if it's pretending really I should be covered Only one more moment We can't just pretend

Really I should be caught

Because I was all alone

I'm not over now

I'm not over now

I'm not I'm not over now i'm

over now

i'm going to The Thank you. Oh, You know, The The touch, my, yeah, cut, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chock, chump, chock, chock, chock,

cut, cut,

but

, and uh... a hapah hap

uh

yeah

uh

yeah Yeah! and the I'm I'm going to I'm No The self-destruction system has been activated.

This island will be disrun in 10 minutes. All the personnel must evacuate immediately to meet.

All the personnel

in fact

away

he's getting

a

lady

make September 28th

The monsters have hope to take in the city.

Goh! I'm going, I'm going to be. and the I'm I'm a

I'm a

I'm I'm going to I'm going to Thank you. The 128 Yeah! Yeah! I'm going to be a lot of the I'm going to I'm going to

I'm

I'm not a bit of a hapahed

but I'm

I'm not My God

What's out of this is all the subject

How do you have a bit out of this is the happy at this

violent

because of this

time is

getting

and the

all of

a

that way a

and

it is a a place and a place to me holding out of the blacklist. Oh yeah, my name. and so uh... uh...

uh...

uh... uh... bork I'm The The and you know

I'm

No

No The

The The The The Yeah, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, and I'm going to life. Oh Oh

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm Hey, don't want to go with that's all. If I blow, will it fool to be the reason that I do.

Cash down on my soul.

Repetting now for our soul.

Voices deep up in my mind and all me feeling like the devil's on me do.

Yeah.

Say, hey, say. and no we know. We know. and so you're a lot of

the

I'm not

I'm

I'm Yeah Oh

Yeah I don't know I'm

I'm gonna say

I'm

I'm

I know I'm

I know I know I don't

I know

I know I know I know I know I know I know I'm I know I'm doing I do

I do

I do

I do people

and don't I'm

I'm

so do

I'm

don't and so

and so

will

and I do

I do

and show I'm and so I'm Will it be the reason I don't I don't cash up

I'm going to

I don't I'm still

And it won't keep feeling

There will be

No

I'm going to go

And so

If I blow

Will it want to be the

reason that I don't cash down on my soul with hands on if I blow Will it be the reason

that I don't

cash down

on my soul

reaping now

for our soul

with this people

in my mind

and go

keep feeling like

the devil

don't he know

he's no

yeah

it's cold for my man I'm going to call.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, I'm a good light now.

I can have you heard of play.

Oh, you know.

Oh. I'm going to be able to say, oh, I'm going to see.

I'm going to see.

I'm

a lot of

I'm sure

with you

I don't

I know

I know

I know

I know

I know

I'm going to and it's one and he's and I'm I know I know I know

I know

I'm and I'm

and I'm don't

and he's

a

and I'm

a so a

I'm

a

man and

I'm

I'm

and I know I know

I know I know I know and I know we can know I know

I know just make

a look out

and it

only

and then

I know The Love is a burning fire stay

Because then the flames grows higher, babe

Don't let them steal your heart

It's easy, easy

Girl easy girl love love

love is a burning fire still.

Because then the flames grows higher pay.

Don't let him steal your heart.

It's easy.

Easy.

Girl, this game can't last forever. easy girl

this game can't last

forever

why

we cannot live

together

try

don't let him take

your love from me

you're look good

can she see

brother louis louis louis

I'm a love set to breathe

oh she's only looking to me

only love breaks apart

brother louis louis only love paradise and she's only Only love breaks up hard, Brother Louis, Louis, Louis.

Only love, paradise, and she's only looking to me.

Brother Louis, Lily, Lily, I'm so looking to me.

Oh, and so looking to me.

She's on her nothing to me.

Brother, loo, Louis, Louis, Lo, Lo, Lo, Lo, and so... She's not in cover But I know you're doing

Oh, I'm doing

It's all in my doing

Because I'm a love

I'm a lot of

Oh fucking suck

Suckin'

MENT

MENTR while we know

they'd beas'd

that's all right

to know to do you'd

do you'd

me wascabas

me comia's

but it was

called when eva

was a per diea and a mansella mordia

our liars see mirene and these

and these gans not go More me comies, more me Gusta No me It's No me It's a

It's a

If you

to do I want to I want to

I want I don't know. Since Ike from you were magicas that's like

a video

without publicar

because this

relation was

so physical

because you and

you and I

always

were chemica

no matter

that's

a secret

a little

a life

because

even we

don't we

don't

we're

we know

the people

know

the people the Bible that we're not we're We're just We know The people Yeah, And the

In the The

Biblical The

The Angels too Beca

Me

Me and and

you

say

And

that that

when

she

That

that person

That

when

you to you

do and If we we that when you to talk, you obsesion

if we

we

don't

function

let me

tenert

one

that

that's that

that's going

so

how much more more me you go do how you want to

you

go miss most no

I'm

I'm

I'm

if

to

you don't I'm

I'm I'm

I

I

know another night I want to I want to I don't know I think

I don't

see if you're I want I want to

Another

Another

Another

No

I'm I'm

I'm Another

Another Another Another Another But I'm put you up to turn, another, other, other, one's night. The President The President

The

The What I know? Oh, and the I'm going to be able to be

my

and

I'm not

I'm

I'm not

a lot of

I'm not going to be. I'm

a lot of I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm and the other people and the other

and the other

and

the other

and I'm

a new I'm and a

I'm

and and the other people are going to be able to be.

And I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm going to

I'm

a

man I'm I'm not

I'm going to

I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm not going to

I'm going to

I'm

I'm mood up y'all y'all been pretty late you know i mean i'm not gonna budge y'all get you shit together i mean it's better than yesterday but you know what I mean

y'all still on that same old shit

even now you know what I mean

yo comrade kid with the 25

what's up bro appreciate you

uh vortex what's up with the 10

what's up y'all

fuck we got a lot to talk about today.

Shit, my camera

didn't, it ain't moved, did it?

See,

y'all,

I mean, I don't want mean, I don't want to

I don't want to look paranoid

but I kind of feel like my fucking camera

moved which I don't know

who the fuck moved it if that's the case

it's just like

it was because my bookshelf always used to be shown bro what the fuck is going on in my house Bro, who's moving my shit?

What the fuck?

Who the fuck is moving my shit?

Right?

I caught that shit.

What the fuck is going on?

Gotta watch out gotta watch out man

gotta i gotta watch out i don't know what the hell is going on

anyway y'all

i got a lot of shit to talk about like there's a lot of shit to talk about.

Like, there's a lot of shit I'm seeing.

I got to break it down.

I got to talk about it because, yeah, this is like,

this whole stream, you call the stream

the multi-polarity stream

because I'm going to break down

everything I'm going to talk about

what is multipolarity

what does it actually mean

forget about the bricks

bitcoin scammers.

What is the theory of world revolution, which is another thing I've been pioneering?

Because, you know, I'm a pioneer of sorts.

And what is it?

What is?

I kind of have to go to the basics.

It's not, this is not a multiparity stream.

This is, this is about what is revolutionary consciousness i want to talk about revolutionary consciousness

so this is going to be a very important stream like legitimately this is an important stream

like i'd love to fuck around i'd love to um i love to just like just like mess around the whole stream this is actually going to be a

serious and important stream and it's going to be very important and i you know y'all need to

pay attention to my words carefully and closely and listen to what i'm saying okay so i want to start this off by responding directly to some of the

outrage we're seeing among left it american leftists and others globally regarding russia and china at

u.n am i fucking disliked others globally regarding Russia and China at UN

am I

fucking dislexic

am I fucking dyslexic?

Stop!

Am I fucking dyslexic?

Why am I

slurring words? All right.

Russia and China's abstentation for u.n resolution 2308 okay a lot of people are super upset because they're basically like u.n. resolution 2 It's the whole weird Tony Blair plan where, you know, they're going to colonize Gaza led by Tony Blair. And it's calling for Hamas to disarm. And it's that weird Trump Tony Blair plan. the UN unanimously agreed to pass it and the permanent members of the Security Council except Russia and China who, you know, abstained rather than vetoed.

Oh, they didn't veto it.

Okay.

A lot of people are upset that they didn't veto it.

And they're saying that Russia and China sold out Palestine.

And that Russia and China have betrayed Palestine and they, they you know their abstentation is uh is a disaster and it's they should have vetoed it they should have intervened they should be and then

it's opening up a conversation like why isn't china doing more for palestine why isn't

russia doing more for palestine isn't Russia doing more for Palestine?

Why are they letting America just get away with anything America wants to do?

What's going on?

You know, why are they...

Okay, so we need to talk about this.

Huh.

Now, I already made the argument, but I'm seeing people respond to the argument that I made. So I think we need to break this down a little bit more, you know, than previously, right?

Lukak's class consciousness.

Guys, who the fuck is Carl Maxing?

Does anyone know that guy in our chat?

Because I'm straight up like ready to ban you

for fucking dropping that fucking disgusting name in my chat.

You just put me in a bad fucking mood and you're on my shit list now. I hope you know that.

Anyway.

So... anyway so it's so fucking cringe

like you know talk about the one fucking thing that destroyed western mark

all Marxism is fucked up

in the West because of this ugly

piece of shit, Luke Cox, this fucking

piece, I am fucking violently

angry. And you know what? I'm going to

drop a bomb on everyone.

Okay?

And please watch Donald Farkinson try to fucking debate okay and please

watch Donald

Farkinson

try to

fucking debate

me on this

such a fucking retard

in original

German

Marx and Engels

never once

use the term

class consciousness

not once in English translations just like the Never once use the term class consciousness. Not once.

In English translations, just like the whole, you know,

spiel about off-hebong and abolition,

yeah, some English translations, you know,

translated some of their words into class consciousness.

But in an original German, they never use that term.

And Lukox is the epitome of Anglo-Box, autism, Marxxism and he should have been shut in the fucking head i never say this i'm an easy-going guy i love open discussion i'm pro intellectual

but but there's some people who commit such egregious revisions of Marxism.

And it makes me enraged because of how popular, not popular, how uncritically people cite Lukox as like the standard way of interpreting and understanding

the various contradictions

and problems within

Marxism. Well, Lukaks is the

go-to guys. Marxism in the West

is literally all fucked up

and mangled and

disgustingly fucking bombed because of Luke Cox.

He is an enemy of you, man.

I hate that guy.

He has no redeeming qualities.

Sorry.

I don't want to go on this fucking spiel.

Okay?

What term did they use for class consciousness?

They didn't have a term for class

consciousness. That's the funny thing.

They never had that kind of term.

Because Marx and Engels had a different understanding of how

revolutionary consciousness

is cultivated than what lucox claims they had a different understanding of what

marxist consciousness was then what lucox claims they never

claimed that marxism was this kind of rendering transparent, you know, what was previously regarded as, you know, strictly objective. They never talked about merging the subjective in the objective in the way

Lukox implies with that term, right? So, no, they had a different understanding of what class

struggle actually is, and more importantly, what is entailed by the revolutionary consciousness.

They had a different understanding of what it's meant.

You know, what are the implications of the kind of idea of a revolutionary subject?

They had a completely different understanding of that than what Lukox attempts to imply.

Anyway, I'm not going to try to get into that.

Somebody fucking wrote that name in my chat.

I got triggered.

It's completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about.

So, Russia and China.

Okay, so the argument that everyone who's smart is making is that Russia and China cannot deliver liberation to the Arabs and Muslims if they don't want it themselves.

You know, the logic of regime change is the epitome of Trotskyism and bourgeois derangement.

The idea that you can liberate of foreign people, when they themselves lack their own domestic revolutionary leadership

when they themselves lack their own domestic revolutionary movement when they themselves

lack their own domestic form of sovereignty, is just preposterous.

What does China know about the Arab and Islamic world? How is that China's business? How can China, you know, or Russia for that matter

give them a guidebook about how to fucking run their own affairs

and part of running your own affairs

is absolutely taking responsibility for your regime

I'm going to go ahead and say that.

The Arab and Islamic world, although

the masses are against the regime,

they can't complain to

Russia and China

that, you know,

well, why aren't you doing anything?

Your own governments are to blame. And they say, well, we aren't you doing anything? Your own governments are to blame.

And they said, well, we're powerless before our own governments.

Well, the CPC was pretty powerless during the long march.

The Bolsheviks were pretty powerless for decades.

Even with respect to questions of international solidarity, the USSR provided plenty of that.

It didn't go anywhere. But even if we discount that fact, what forces exist in the Middle East or

the Arab world right now?

Even if Russia and China wanted to engage in international solidarity and assisting these revolutionary forces, where are they? Who are they?

Where are they and who are they?

Okay, someone mentioned Yemen.

Okay, well, they are helping Yemen.

China is helping Yemen.

So show me where these forces are.

Where's the leadership?

Where are the revolutionary forces in the Arab and Islamic world that Russia and China should stick their neck out for? Because what you have is Hamas, which is encircled within Gaza, which you have is Hezbollah, which has been severely neutralized or incapacitated i should say and is also isolated because of what

happened in syria and by the way before anyone wants to point fingers about what happened in

syria before you blame russia before you blame china hell even before you blame Russia, before you blame China, hell, even before you blame Iran, although

the, I would say in this case, the reformist factions in Iran, because that's their turf, because

it's Iran's turf, that region, it's mainly their blame if you're going to blame any foreign actor.

I'll go ahead and say that 100%.

Who's the blame for what happened to Hezbollah?

I would say it's the reformists in Iran.

I would not blink before saying that. But you know who it's,

you know who's to blame before it's any external government or state or anything? It's the people.

And that's actually a rotten truth, but it's the fucking truth.

The people are to blame.

We are to blame.

Everyone is to blame.

Those who have not mustered the ability to produce a new revolutionary outlook and new revolutionary leadership

are to blame. The Chinese

people produced the CPC

who experienced

the long march. That wasn't easy.

The Russian people produced the Bulls. That wasn't easy.

Russian Civil War wasn't

fucking easy to win. Chinese Civil War wasn't fucking easy to win.

Chinese Civil War wasn't easy to win.

That was an extreme...

They had overwhelming odds stacked up against them.

So, who do you blame for shit being all fucked up?

Well, you blame no one but yourself, actually. Now,

who should Western leftists blame,

since we're playing the blame game?

Should blame themselves. Why haven't

you held your regime accountable?

Why can't you mount pressure on

your own government? What's

your fucking excuse,

you piece of shit? Before you go and blame

Russia and China, you're an American

living in the USA, the country

most responsible, like Donald Parkinson,

whose whole strategy is to

dwell inside the DSA

and just wait, and they're playing Menshevik Stagesome within an organization that's not even a party.

Like not even as applied to the scale of a country, but to some fucking nebulous, trendy organization that's not even a political party. I digress.

What is your fucking excuse for not being able

to effectively mount

some kind of opposition to the regime inside the USA?

You know, some kind of pressure to exert upon them. Okay. Now, you could ask me,

what's your, what's your excuse, Haas? None. Literally none whatsoever. I feel like I'm doing

everything that I possibly can at the rate that is possible, but I can't do it alone.

Okay.

I've always extended and opened my hand anyone.

I mean, you know, I want to talk about this for one second.

I don't want to, like, detract or digress too much or whatever, get carried away on it.

But it's like, you know, if the entire U.S. Radical Left joined the ACP, like tomorrow,

like we'd probably have a revolution in five years.

I mean, I shouldn't say that. We'd probably have a revolution in five years i mean i shouldn't say that we'd probably

have a pretty good chance of at least exerting significant influence and pressure on the country

forget forget winning the masses if all the u.s leftists just joined acp tomorrow

that's all it would really take they just

and what's so what's their excuse not to join us well their excuses that they have you know

their preferences well i don't prefer that. These aren't my values.

It's not my revolution.

It's not my revolution unless it's about my preferences.

My personal preferences and taste.

And it's like, here I am.

It's like, okay, you don't want to join ACP?

Well, why don't we just put together like a coalition of all the people we currently have who are against Israel and against U.S. foreign policy?

No, you're a bigot. Now, I want to be picky. I want to be picky. Okay, so you picky little bitch, you fucking eat the blame for Gaza.

You eat it. Because since you're so

fucking picky with your tastes

and preferences, this is on you.

You can't

fucking do what it takes

to actually build

a competent, large, successful pressure and opposition against your

own regime because of your preferences, not because of material necessities, not because an

appraisal that, you know, oh, HCP has the wrong strategy. I mean, nobody

thinks, by the way, nobody opposes us

because they think we can't win. I want you

to know that. Not a single one of these left

is opposed the ACP because they

think we can't win. They do think

we can win. That's why they actively go out of

their fucking way to sabotage

us.

If their opposition to us

was based in the idea that we're not viable

and that we can't win,

they would fuck off and never talk about

us and just

if we're going to fail

they are not going to be the ones to assume

responsibility right no they go out of their way to try

to fucking wreck us and fuck

our shit up right

nobody opposes us because they think

we're not viable because they think we have a bad

strategy because they think that we can't win because they think we have a bad strategy, because they think

that we can't win. I see these people fear-mongering about the possibility that we win, the

possibility that we go. These people are going to be the next Hitler. Oh my God! Like, they consider

us to be dangerous for a reason, right?

Nobody fucking thinks

that ACP

is bad because they, like, can't win.

No, they, they are

going out of their way to gatekeep

and ensure in their mind that we can't win because they actually think it would be bad for them if we did.

So there you go.

I don't want to hear people talk about Russia and China when you will not even commit to forming a competent opposition within your own country who's the main guilty party to the entire genocide because you have these small little preferences that make you feel comfy and cozy about being such a morally good person.

Fuck you, Aggie. Literally, fuck you. It's not my revolution. Hey, fuck you.

Literally, fuck you.

It's not my revolution.

Hey, fuck you.

It'll never be your revolution, you piece of shit.

The revolution exists to fucking wipe your bitch ass off the fucking face of the fucking universe you bitch it's it's never

going to be your fucking revolution you're not the subject of the revolution you should be grateful to serve the revolutionary cause.

It has nothing to fucking do with appeasing you personally.

Anyway, I don't want to talk about this.

I want to talk about what's important, right, in terms of this debate.

Russia and China can't liberate the Arab and Islamic world. They can't. Okay, so

why is it that they couldn't veto the current plan for Gaza? Well, people are saying, well, why couldn't

they at least veto it?

Well, it's going to cause World War III if they

veto the resolution? No,

it's not going to cause World War III.

But I'll tell you exactly

why it's in their interests to abstain

rather than veto it ready do i have to pull up a map of the

world should i do that should i pull up a map of the world i will i'll just do that i'm gonna just

pull up a map of the world hopefully this is a large one all right we'll just do that. I'm gonna just pull up a map of the world. Hopefully this is a large one. All right. We'll just gonna have a map of the world. Okay, world map.

Or be tall with the 10. What's up, bro? Appreciate you. So we're going to pull up a map of the world, all right?

And I will just show you and explain to you.

All right. So I like visual helpers, you know, so people understand. Because, you know, a lot of these, like, liberal universalists think that geography in the world, like, it's just like this abstract plane of morality. And say, it's not. There's actually, this is actually like a reality, right? so we're talking about tangible countries and geographies

here right anyway look so russia china are here okay now here's the middle east okay so i'm

putting this up because i think a lot of Americans, like, don't know where things are on the map.

My cursor is not even showing. Jesus Christ.

So how do I... I don't know.

All right, well, the Middle East is here, right?

Here you go.

My cursor's not showing up.

Dark NRG.

What's up?

All right.

So, here's the issue.

So, here is Gaza.

You can't see it because my cursor

is not showing, right? But

it's in the Middle East.

It's so stupid.

All right. Anyway,

I want you to

understand this geopolitically and geographically.

This is Trump's plan. The U.S. is the preeminent, super-imperialist, unipolar hegemon.

And Trump and the UK are imposing this plan on the Middle East.

Okay.

Syria is ruled by Jolani.

Okay.

Saudi Arabia.

Okay.

Egypt.

Algeria.

Algeria voted in favor of this.

Okay.

Here's nuclear armed Pakistan.

Pakistan was member of the Security Council and voted in favor of it.

Temporary Security Council, not the permanent one, but they voted in favor of it.

Pakistan is one of the largest Muslim countries. I think it's the second largest one after Indonesia. Am I correct? And it's the only one that's nuclear armed. Pakistan voted in favor of Trump's plan. There is not a single Arab or Islamic

power in the world

besides Iran

and maybe, and

the Houthis in Yemen, who are not even

recognizing the UN, I don't think,

who oppose this plan. So look where Gaza is surrounded by.

In order for Russia and China to veto this plan that all of these powers already agreed to,

they would have to be contradicting and going against the will of the Arab and Islamic

countries. Now, what's wrong with that? All these countries are ruled by bastards. You think China or

Russia have any love for Saudi Arabia or the Emirates or Egypt or something like that?

Of course they don't. Of course they don't have any love for these regimes.

But all this would do, all this would do, all them vetoing this and saying

no we reject this all that's going to do

is take away what little

influence they do actually happen to exert

upon these regimes

and throw that in the fucking garbage

and put the Gulf states, Egypt, and all the Arab and Islamic countries unconditionally behind the U.S.

Now, of course, these are already, Master Yoto, what's up?

Now, of course, okay, these countries are U.S. puppets. No one's denying that. But China and Russia

have done things to irritate the U.S. when it comes to inroads and deals and partnerships and economic

agreements and things like that to kind of undermine

help chip away and undermine at the U.S. adgemony politically. For example, look at the reaction of these

countries to Russia's SMO. Okay. So there are slow kind of small things that Russia's SMO. Okay. So there are slow,

kind of small things

that Russia and China have done

to win over

these like neutral countries

in their favor against the U.S.

Are they still ultimately

under U.S. egemony?

Yes, they are. Are they still ultimately answerable to the U.S.? Yeah, of course they are. But Russia and China do have some degree of influence that they didn't have before. Now, in order for Russia and China to have an alternative plan, which Russia did actually draft an alternative plan, Russia drafted an alternative peace agreement and shared it and circulated it, and it was rejected by the Muslims and Arabs themselves, the countries, that is, their governments.

So what, let's say Russia and China veto this resolution. What's their alternative? What alternative resolution will Russia and china deem necessary when this resolution this alternative one

that they would be forwarding instead would be going against the will of the Arab and Islamic governments and countries.

How are Russia and China going to clash heads with them?

And how can they even fucking afford to do that?

Russia is dealing with Europe and is dealing with Ukraine.

China is dealing with the Pacific and Taiwan province and now Japan.

So what kind of confrontation do U.S. leftists expect Russia and China to have? not only with the U.S. and England and so on, but also with all the Arab and Islamic governments. I think what they want is Russia and China to export revolution, which is a policy of adventurism, but let's even entertain it let's entertain it because the uss

r tried this right let's entertain it okay to entertain it who are they going to support

what revolutionary forces to entertain it where? What revolutionary forces to entertain

it? Where's the revolutionary

forces in Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood?

In the UAE and Saudi

Arabia, in the region.

Is there like a large

communist movement

revolutionary movement

in the Middle East

that has a viable chance of like

toppling these regimes and

restoring

dignity to the people of the Arab and Islamic

world

there was Iran and Hezbo dignity to the people of the Arab and Islamic world.

There was Iran and Hezbollah and the axis of resistance.

There was.

Russia and China did whatever they could to assist them.

There's not much they could do.

They did it through Iran.

Iran was the linchpin of that entire thing.

But Iran, Reisi, died in a helicopter crash under mysterious circumstances, and Iran decided to pursue agreements and ties with the West.

Iranian politicians, prevailing Iranian politicians, very loudly, very loudly, talked about their open mistrust for China, how they fear Iran becoming dependent upon China, how Iran needs to preserve its balanced, neither east nor west, posture with respect to the conflict between China and the United States.

Skepticism and hostility toward Russiaussia is even more prominent within iranian politics so

russia and china see iran not even fully on board and on code which is ostensibly the most the most

anti-u-. force within the region. What can they fucking do? Literally, what can they do?

Now, people say, well, they could just veto it. By them vetoing it, the burden falls upon Russia and China to produce a different resolution.

So, Russia and China have a better idea of what it should be? I mean, in collaboration with what?

Okay, you could say, well, in collaboration with Hamas. But if you have Russia and China and Hamas working together against Egypt and Jordan and Syria, Algeria, Algeria is not a neighboring country, but they were, just like Pakistan.

They did vote in favor of the resolution.

How is Iran, think about this, how is Russia and China going to maintain an alliance

with Hamas, not the Palestinian

authority that they formally recognized, by the

way,

and have this kind of, I don't know,

this, maybe Iran can be thrown

in, even though Iran is like begging

and negotiating the U.S. right now

for

and negotiating with them for peace.

So Russia

and China should work with Hamas

against the entire

Middle East region. How are you going to

do that without declaring war on these

regimes and governments how can russia and china sustain that how can they sustain that how

and then people say well what about america america this america that you're right russia and

china are not America.

They absolutely aren't.

America is a global hegemon, and Russia and China aren't.

America has how many military bases worldwide compared to Russia and China?

Think about it.

People don't understand this. Russia and China

don't have U.S. military bases around

the world at any comparable scale.

They don't have

the IMF. They don't have the World Bank.

They don't have unilateral rules-based world order institutions

they don't have the financial domination of the world they don't china has extensive

economic and trade deals with the world.

But you know what?

China is not the primary world creditor.

It's not.

It really isn't.

China doesn't have anywhere near as much leverage,

whether economic or military, over the world,

that the U.S. does. Neither does Russia. Russia has a lot of arms from the Soviet era. They have a lot of military equipment. They don't have U.S. military

bases around the world. They don't have the U.S. Navy. Neither Russia nor China has the U.S. Navy.

How many aircraft carriers do Russia and China have compared to the U.S.?

Anyone want to in my chat, if you know?

Compare U.S. aircraft carriers to Russia and China, okay?

Absolutely incomparable.

It's a negligible amount in comparison.

Okay.

So stop deluding yourself.

Russia and China can do a lot for for liberating the former Soviet space and large parts of Eurasia and East Asia from U.S. influence. They can.

Yes.

That's China's entire goal is here.

The South China Sea and East Asia.

China wants to kick out all of U.S. influence in East Asia and in the Indo-Pacific

region in general.

That's what China's working toward. It's

extremely difficult for China to

maintain that strategy.

Same thing with Russia. Russia's trying to do the same

in the former Soviet space. they've been in ukraine

for over three years coming on four years now very very difficult it's not easy okay so now

u.s leftists are demanding r Russia and China open a new front by themselves with that

in the Middle East for Gaza, for Palestine? And they're like, well, that's as good a cause as any.

Sure. Sure sure I agree morally speaking and if we abstract

morality in a vacuum it is but wouldn't that just escalated into a bigger war?

Wouldn't that mean that the carnage and destruction we see in Gaza would just spread on a much larger scale

because that would inevitably create a confrontation with the U.S. and a third world war?

Isn't that exactly what it would do if Russia and China started making aggressive moves in the Middle East?

Wouldn't that immediately activate

a confrontation with the

U.S.?

I mean, how could they do that?

Literally, explain to me how they can...

How can Russia fight in Ukraine

and fend off NATO in Europe?

How can China fend off...

I mean, look at the U.S.

This is why I opened the map, because some people

are retarded and don't understand geography.

Look at the U.S.

What threatens

the U.S.?

Venezuela?

By the way, it's one of the pretexts for intervention in Venezuela right now.

Cuba?

Mexico, the Mexican cartels?

Where's the threat coming to the U.S.?

Because the U.S. is all the way over fucking here, okay?

They're all the way here.

Russia has all of NATO right on his doorstep.

China has the disgusting regime in Japan to deal with.

It has Taiwan

Separatist forces in Taiwan

and it has this giant

headache over here

in Southeast Asia

to deal with and manage.

And then it has India, right on his doorstep.

You think Russia and China have the same freedom that America has?

I want people to just think in realistic terms.

So this is the reality.

Russia and China. Russia and China

should not be expected to do much.

I don't even know how to explain this shit to people.

Russia and China do not want to govern the world

for a very simple reason, and it's not because they're benevolent or whatever.

Contrary to what the retard realists think, governing the world is very costly and very

expensive, and it's a massive headache. I want to explain to you the difference between Russia, China, and the USA.

And this will help you better understand multipolarity, because they have actually different systems.

Even Russia has a different system than the USA.

So in US-unit polarity,S. acts as a world police with a rules-based international order.

But compare the rate of internal development in the United States without Russia and China. Russia and China expend a great deal more of resources on

internal governments and development than the USA does. So it's a cost-benefit analysis.

The U.S. decides that ruling the world is better than ruling your own country, having your own house in order.

The U.S. doesn't govern effectively inside the U.S.

The U.S. is not economically developing the U.S. in any comparable degree that Russia and China are self-developing.

So this is a fact, okay?

So Russia and China

have very, very

complex systems of

internal governance and internal

economic development.

That system, that's internal to Russia and internal economic development. That system that's internal to Russia and internal to China is at the same degree of complexity, if not more complex, than the global U.S. unipolar system. Can you understand that? At the scale of the

entire world, the entire U.S. unipolar system in its complexity is the same as the internal systems of governance and development within russia

and within china can you please appreciate that fact china's internal system rivals in its complexity, the unipolar system at the scale of the entire world led by the US. Why? Because the unipolar system at the scale of the entire world isn't even all that. It's not intensive. It's one broad brush, one big stick that's unilaterally imposed on the entire world. It's not very intelligent. It's not very intensive. It hasn't actually

succeeded in developing the world. It's extremely crude. But because it encompasses the scale of the

entire world, it's pretty complex. But has a very very complex internal system of governance and internal system of economic development that is i would say it's in some ways it's more complex and more profound than U.S. unipolar

globality.

Okay.

So given that fact, internal governance in both Russia and China is a tremendous feat.

It's not easy.

It's like what it's like it's what they're all about.

Like it's really hard.

In Russia it's really hard to keep the population satisfied and keep everything stable and ensure the country is developing.

And the same exact thing is true within China. Same exact thing. It's a lot of effort that goes in to taking care of your own which the u.s. doesn't do by the way

so there's a lot of effort that goes into that if russia and china wanted to rule the world

they would have to take that internal system that they have and suddenly expand it just from the logic of bureaucracy it is not in their interest the chinese state and the russian state do not want to have to fucking deal with the world and governing the world.

It's way too costly. It's way too resource intensive.

China, you know how much it costs China to stabilize and ensure the security within Xinjiang?

The same thing is true of Russia in the caucuses.

Imagine Russia's area of responsibility going beyond the Caucasus, beyond Ukraine, beyond its own fucking neighborhood.

Now Russia has

to ensure the security

of Iraq

and of Sudan.

How the fuck is Russia going to do that?

And then Russia and China

are going to go

and confront nuclear-armed Israel.

You know how difficult it is for Russia to confront the non-nuclear armed bandits that were in Chechnya?

That was really costly for its internal state machine.

How was you going to overextend to the Middle East?

Same thing in China.

China was very, very worried and anxious about the situation in Xinjiang.

You think China is going to cross Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Afghanistan,

and then somehow also Iran, I guess, or maybe they'll go through the Arabian Sea.

And I guess they're going to what?

They're going to trample over Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, you know, Syria with ISIS, Jolani, Egypt, and

nuclear-armed Israel.

It sounds based.

You know, I see these ex-posterers who are like,

oh, uh, I wish there was red bonapartism.

It's like, look, it sounds totally based.

It's just not fucking real.

You're not living in the same planet.

You're not living in reality.

It's so fucking infantile.

It's literally like you're a child.

And you're watching movies about atrocities

in Africa like Hotel Rwanda

and you're like, why can't we just send

the military to save those people?

That's not how

the world works. It's not how anything works.

You're literally a fucking child. That's not how it works. It's just not.

You think that your moral aspirations can simply be affected upon the world through missiles and tanks and guns and airplanes.

You're a trots. I mean, you're literally just a neo-conservative. You're literally just a liberal.

This is the liberal universalism of the Anglolo-saxon civilization that's what you

believe you believe in humanitarian interventionism but that's not how the world works

nobody's going to free palestine if the region if the entire region is against palestine

if the entire region doesn't care about Gaza.

Who can you blame?

But the region itself... that that's something that that entire region's going to have to reckon with for all history i'm saying well it's just the government's not the people.

Yeah, and it's the responsibility of a people

to hold their regimes

to account. Well, they can't because it's a because it would be a very bloody struggle and stuff.

Well, China and Russia went through that struggle.

So why should they sympathize with anyone who's not willing to do what they had to do?

Why should China sympathize with anyone who's not going to, who's not, who doesn't want to put

down their match coffee and have their own long march?

Think about that.

China had a long, you know how fucking brutal the long march was?

Why would China sympathize with any people,

including American people,

in the sense of like China's going to fight your revolution for you?

Who fought China's revolution?

Where was the world when the CPC was encircled from all fucking corners during the long march, bleeding out and dying and starving.

Where was the fucking world?

And China's not bitter and upset at anyone over that.

It's just that revolutionary responsibility falls upon you and no one else.

It falls upon you and no one else. It falls on you to be responsible for your own future.

If you're not willing to make the sacrifice,

China can't be expected to Neither can Russia

How many people live in Egypt?

I want to put this in your fucking mind

How many people live in Egypt?

It's somewhere south of what 90 100 million am i correct 80 to 100 million right in egypt

do i have that correct? Okay, about 100 million.

Over 100.

I didn't know that.

Over 100.

Over 100 million people live in Egypt alone.

China can't liberate Gaza if the 116 million people in Egypt cannot force their own regime and organize to save Gaza themselves.

And I'm sure if they did that,

Russia and China would have no problem assisting them.

But they can't do it by themselves.

And they're a wise America able to do all this shit.

Because America's right here.

Nobody threatens America.

America has no security situation surrounding it.

America had a hundred-year head start.

Are you forgetting that America had a hundred-year head start to create the biggest war machine ever seen on the face of the earth?

Are you forgetting that the USA had the head start in consolidating the entirety of the fucking British Empire?

Hey, remember, these guys, Russia and China, they've always been

the underdogs. Rebelling against the system. They did not, they did not topple the system.

That's not what multipolarity means. Okay. okay so yeah they could have vetoed it

and clashed with all the Arab and Islamic

governments and Pakistan

and the burden is now on Russia and China to have a different

right okay how are Russia and China to have a different...

Okay, how are Russia and China going to enforce the...

Is Russia and China going to send their own

peacekeeping troops to Gaza?

How are they going to do that without directly going

to war with the U.S.?

Think about... Just think in your

fucking head.

You reject the resolution.

That means the burden falls on you to produce an alternative.

What's their enforcing mechanism for the alternative?

And what's the incentive for anyone to cooperate?

China's going to say, okay, I'm going to shut down the entire world.

All roads lead to a war with the USA, if

that's the case.

You know?

So this is the fact

is it's tragic and it's horrible and it's not good nobody in china or russia

or not i would say nobody they they don't particularly find it to be a good situation either.

Both Russia and China have critiqued the resolution, but without the cooperation of the regional powers or the regional actors, they cannot impose their will

on the Middle East.

They just can't.

And how is the U.S. able to do that?

You think

the U.S., you think Russia

and China want to become the next U.S.?

They don't.

They really don't.

They have a completely different logic of existence

that's based on internal development.

Not being the world police.

That's something that their own bureaucracies find to be a nightmare scenario.

They don't want it. They literally don't. It's just, it's just, for them in their mind, it's like, this is just going to take resources. It's going to be too costly.

It would cause so much instability for their internal governance.

People forget the fact that Russia and China are insurgent world powers that are, yes, still going up against the grain of U.S. unipolar hegemony.

China has become the largest economy in the world.

That doesn't mean at this point it's going to be able

to embark on a revolutionary adventure

against the U.S.

Okay.

So people are saying, also so so china's acting in self-interest russia's acting in self-interest where's the revolutionary morality where's the morality okay first of all

this is why i want to talk about

multipolarity because this is a

unipolar logic

this is a unipolar

moralistic logic and I'm going to

completely dismantle it

all right I'm going to completely

dismantle it

a lot of people are extremely confused about the

meaning of multipolarity so i will explain it in materialist terms okay

got to roll up my sleeves

Because this is a tall order

Yeah

The unipolar world order

Should I use MS paint?

I need a bunch of ones

If 20, 20 subs

If you want me to use MS paint Fuck it Drop a subs if you want me to use MSPaint.

Fuck it.

Drop a 20 if you want me to use MSPaint.

Let me continue.

Yeah, you have to pay me for it.

I'll just use my hands, okay?

So... use my hands. So, the unipolar system...

In the Cold War, there was a bipolar system.

You had ComCon.

You had the Socialist Block.

And you had this kind of small, relatively small, network of, you know, paradigm of global development.

Jesus Christ.

Jennifer, I wasn't expecting that.

Well, thank you so much.

Okay, Jennifer.

Jennifer paid for it.

I mean, I didn't even know it was worth it.

Jennifer, thank you.

I didn't know an MS paint was worth that. Jennifer, thank you. I didn't know an MS.

Paint was worth that much.

Anyway, thank you so

much, Jennifer. Appreciate you.

Anyway,

um,

so this is just

unipolarity, right?

U.S.

unipolarity. right? U.S. unipolarity.

All right.

I'm talking about the bipolar world.

So U.S. unipolarity, following 1945, created this kind of...

Amila with the 10. What's going on? Wow!

Amila with the 10! What's up?

It's the system of super-imperialism that Michael Hudson talked about.

So they actually...

In actual fact, there's a specific kind of circuit of, you know,

dollar recycling, the recycling of imperialist super profits.

That's what U.S. Unipolar, you know, the unipolar system was.

It's what Michael Hudson describes as super imperialism. Okay, so there was a bipolar world that in fact did not create an alternative system at all so the look, this is the snake.

Okay.

I'm not, I'm going to leave out the E.

Because I, you know, this is how, according to psychologists, by when you spell

shit wrong wrong people remember

or something right

the snake

um

ribania with the five what's up

okay

this is the snake so

the Soviet the other world in the bipolar world it was just a kind of asymmetrical

resistance the soviet union would just bite it'd be a thorn in the side of the u.s that's all it was

doing the communist world didn't create an alternative

system whatsoever it created

kind of irregular

economic political

especially political warfare

to cause instability and chaos

for saz what's up with the 10 the Soviets were To cause instability and chaos.

VersaSaz, what's up with the 10?

The Soviets were basically, this is what JFK was talking about by armed guerrillas by night, causing chaos and revolution.

The Soviet Union was trying to, like, fuck up the entire U.S. led Brentwood system and they were doing so

primarily through political means.

So economics was an extension of politics.

That was the Cold War.

So the Soviets were mounting a resistance and just trying to, like, tear the system up,

waging an asymmetrical war against U.S. unipolarity.

So bipolarity is kind of misleading, because you had U.S. unipolarity. So bipolarity is kind of misleading

because you had U.S. unipolarity

and then you had the Soviets

trying to resist it.

Well, Soviets were resisting it in vain.

I can't talk about this

in depth too much

because there's so many nuances,

but it was in vain. The U.S. system actually

turned out to work pretty well, the system of super imperialism, and its form of development was just more complex than the Soviet kind.

More complex, more robust, more dynamic, yada, yada, yada.

So this is a fact, by the way. This is a fact.

So this is the U.S. Unipolar world.

The American snake prevailed.

Okay?

So in 1991 or 1889 happens.

Poland want to be part of the New World Order, please.

Czech Republic is

a noble European member.

All right.

So, you know,

there were these kind of

epicycles within

the U.S.

Unipolar system.

This is the EU

right here.

So, remember,

I don't know how to explain Michael Hudson's super imperialism in a really simple way, but I'll just explain it this way. In essence, super imperialism emerges when imperialist capital undergoes a transformation where the same forces that are exporting capital are also simultaneously importing it.

Okay?

This is so complicated.

Lenin talked about imperialism primarily as the export of capital, right?

But in super imperialism, you have the export of capital in the form of financial capital which simultaneously

um simultaneously um simultaneously establishes you as the importer so this is what they mean by dollar recycling.

It's this dual status of being a net,

I'm sorry, being a creditor and a debtor.

So for example, when the Federal Reserve,

you know, when it prints money

out of thin air

it's doing it as a loan

and it's pumping

credit to fund

the U.S. economy and to fund primarily

the U.S. military, right?

So it's credit.

They're printing money,

and this is a form of credit.

Okay.

But they're also creating,

you know,

they're creating debt.

So they're becoming a debtor. Because the way that they print money is that they issue bonds and they have to pay these bonds over a period of time. So it's this kind of

scissigy between being a creditor

and a debtor that basically

defines U.S. Unipolar

imperialism, you know,

the whole system. The whole system of dollar

recycling. Okay?

I'm like simplifying

the fuck out of this because I just don't have

the patience to fucking go so in depth

that it's going to take like three hours

so this is unipolar

imperialism

okay dollar recycling

now I'm simplifying okay dollar recycling now

I'm simplifying a lot

like a lot

and I'm not even getting to the origins of how

multipolarity actually emerged

but multipolarity

let's say

you know we're talking about China

is different

within multipolarity

the same logic

of you know the simultaneous status of debtor and creditor is used as a mechanism

not for the accumulation of capital so this is all about the accumulation of capital okay this is all the accumulation of

capital but for example if you're the um people's bank in china you there is a recycling mechanism

that's going on okay

there's so much complexity

here because they have a dual

track currency system and I don't want to have

to get into the nuances of how

they use their foreign exchange currency

to fuel this process. It's really complex, especially how that interfaces with U.S. Unipolarity. But just know this. China kind of does the same thing that the U.S. does, but it does it for a strategic purpose.

So, so let's just say

strategic internal development,

capital.

The system that

that's represented by

US unipolarity is just to accumulate capital.

So it has its origins in Anglo-Saxon liberal capitalism, right?

Where the whole thing is a profit motive.

I mean, the linchpin is just capital accumulation, right?

But it's also being used to fund the U.S. military. Well, China takes the logic

of polarity, U.S. unit polarity. This is, so this is a polarity.

This is what economic polarity means okay

this is a polarity this is what it is okay

so this polarity which was abstract and global, became something regional, civilizational, and determinate in China.

Because China has this kind of profit recycling mechanism internally,

whose purpose is to fund or facilitate strategic internal development.

The same thing thing so China

literally borrows from itself

okay can I just

explain this like because it's so fucking simple

the Chinese people's bank will print

money to build fucking railroads

and they'll build fucking infrastructure and they'll build

fucking cities and then

they'll pay and then they're in debt to

themselves and then they'll pay themselves

back when those things

become economically lucrative

and efficient.

So they'll print money

as a debt to themselves

and then they'll pay themselves back

when it fucking yields results.

Like that's just as that fucking simple.

So after the SMO in 2022,

Russia started doing the same thing.

Russia stopped being a net borrower from, you know,

global financial institutions, and Russian banks just started internally lending to themselves to Russian enterprises, to Russian strategic sectors of the economy, in line with a industrial policy that was based on internal

strategic economic development so russia cemented its status as an independent poll when it stopped being a net borrower and it started just

pumping out its own credit and borrowing from itself to bankroll its own development

and fund its own development.

So I'm skipping all of the scams

that you hear about Bricks News and Bitcoin shit.

I'm just giving to you what actual multipolarity is you have something that was universal and abstract

and only for the abstract purpose of capital accumulation this system kind of regionalized

in a sovereign way because

the Cold War it was very clear. America

won the Cold War. China understood this. Russia understood this.

So they adopted a very complex economic system

that was in many ways inspired by the U.S. global capitalist

system, but

which was put in the service

of strategic internal

development rather than capital

accumulation.

And that's what happened

in Russia. First, it happened in China, and then Russia slowly started doing this. How did Russia start doing this? Russia started doing this when Putin nationalized the energy sector. When Putin nationalized the energy sector which is actually what put him into

conflict with the west that was actually used to build the basis for uh russian capital for

the purposes of independent development internally.

And Brazil, which is supposedly another poll,

is regarded as a poll because they did the same with Petrobras,

with their state-owned oil company in Brazil under Lula.

I have a lot of criticisms of Lula.

I'm not saying he's a champion of political multipolarity.

But economically, you see something similar in Brazil because of that.

So how many polls are there?

Well, we should, you have to analyze the economics.

You have to analyze, is the country a net borrower?

How is the country bankrolling its development?

Is it borrowing from the IMF?

If you're dependent on the IMF? If you're dependent

on the IMF, you haven't

established your own poll. But if

you've created a sovereign basis

of the

dispension of credit for the purposes

of independent development, and you've

created this kind of recycling mechanism of profit that facilitates internal development, you've created a poll.

So that's what China and Russia have.

So this is the essence of multipolarity.

It's primarily an emergent economic tendency within the world.

It's not necessarily a geopolitical reality.

It is first and foremost a change in the global economic system, which is objective.

And it is objectively true.

Would you say the IMF itself is a poll?

Well, if you've been paying attention, this is the unipole, which the IMF is a part of.

It's the unipole. Okay. i mf is a part of it's the unipole okay the reason there's no longer just a unipole and there's also other poles is because um of something that happened in terms of the development of economic systems.

So yes, the IMF is a poll, but it's not one poll among others.

That's the difference.

For the IMF to be one poll among others, like within multipolarity

it has to be employed

for the purposes

how do I

explain shit to people like do you need

Hegel to understand this

you take what you fucking have

because you're probably a large country or a large region

so whether it's oil,

whether it's natural wealth,

whether it's capital,

whether it's skilled labor or something,

you just,

you have it. It's yours. You use that, okay, to create the basis for dispensing and creating credit, which indebts you to yourself

to facilitate industrial policy and strategic industrial development.

That's not what the U.S. does, though. What the U.S. does is that it originally kind of had that for its industrialization period in the late 19th century and after.

But when it started becoming an imperialist power, as per Lenin, as Lenin understood it,

what the U.S. does is it prints money that it that is not backed by anything like unlike Russia, which is backed by its own oil assets. Now, technically, it's backed by, you know, Aramco, and it's backed by Saudi oil or something, right?

But you see how this is just abstract and global in scale, unlike Russia and China, whose own pull is based in like what they themselves can control and have themselves regionally.

The U.S. form of capital.

Okay, put it this way, right?

U.S.

Economic polarity and global capital is based in natural resources, supply chains,

supply chains um Okay, typing it is easier for me than saying it. Can you understand this?

When the Federal Reserve prints money,

like what is, what is that, what, um, what is it securitizing, you know, what is it it collateralizing i should rather say trust in the u.s because we have a big navy what what's the collateral for when the federal reserve prints

money the collateral in the case of r and China is A, the existing, you know,

industrial and natural resource wealth that they have, and then B, future ability to develop

and therefore pay it

pay it off but in the case of the US

it's actually nothing

there's no need to even consider that because it's nothing

it's based on the abstraction of financial capital and nothing else.

Now, in reality, we know that's not the case.

In reality, you know, you have Aramco, you have all sorts of things which collateralize the U.S. dollar capital, right?

But that is not like systemically

something guaranteed, like formally,

unlike Russia and China.

So, so U.S.

unipolarity is just not viable.

For many reasons, it's not viable.

Okay, it's not viable.

I'm just, I'm not using any moral language.

I'm telling you why it's not sustainable.

A, it comes at the expense of strategic internal development.

Because it's based only on capital accumulation, it's not based on a strategy.

So it's, it comes at the expense of, um, prosperity at home, which is something we've been seeing, okay?

We've, we've been seeing that for sure.

Like, most definitely right and then also you have the problem of control it demands an extraordinary

degree of control over global natural resources and supply chains.

This is, if you look at the balance of payments, which is a term that Michael Hudson

loves using, doesn't add up. The cost of maintaining this form of capital is just much higher than what it can yield in

term of the bottom line in terms of profit this is why the u.s is 40 trillion dollars in debt because the

u.s needs to control because it's not guided by a is $40 trillion in debt. Because the U.S. needs

to control, because it's not

guided by a strategic economic policy

of development, it has

to control Saudi oil. It has

to control or limit,

I should rather say, the extent

to which EU industries can develop. It has to do all sorts of things that require

the backing of the U.S. military and maintaining

thousands of military bases across the world and in engaging in armed interventions

around the world it's just not viable it's just not something that's sustainable it's just not

it's really just not. I mean, the balance of

payments, ads doesn't add up. It just doesn't add up. So that's why, you know, the U.S. is

marked by systemic dysfunction. And ultimately, the system can technically keep going forever if human beings just don't do anything about it. but it's going to come at the cost

of the system being

solvent, and eventually it's going to come

at the cost of Americans

being able to put food on their table.

When Americans can no longer

put food on their table,

there's going to be civil unrest internally.

And then second of all, when enough actors globally start getting pissed off, there's going to be military confrontations, which the U.S. will probably lose because it can't fight the entire world.

So this can't go on indefinitely for those two reasons.

Unless the population does nothing while it starves and dies and just dwindles, you know?

So, this is the reality.

Okay, so I hope you have an understanding of multiparity that is better than what you had before.

Okay.

So that's all multipolarity is that's all it is it's

nothing else now now i'm gonna go back to ms paint because now i just explained to a multipolarity is right so now there's a different thing going on right which people confuse with multipolarity but is actually different okay so remember this distinction in Marxism between the superstructure and the base?

Okay, well, I'm just going to simplify it here.

The base is multipolar, okay?

It's the superstructure. is multipolar. Okay.

It's the superstructure that remains unipolar. Because

the U.S. global military machine

is no longer

a

a like is no longer a, um, a, like, uh, determining, like, you know, material form of the relations of production.

It is a political superstructure.

Okay.

Keep that in your mind.

U.S. military is a political superstructure.

Okay. same with russia so so globally you still have u.s unipolarity at the level of the superstructure okay

the base is multipolar already the superstructure is unipolar.

So this is, so look,

during the Cold War,

during the Cold War,

you had U.S.

multipolarity, and then you had

the Soviet Union politically

harassing the shit out of this system and preventing it from

taking full from from from functioning as intended or whatever right from taking form right remember um

so the so the soviet union was the political superstructure attempting to retard

and prevent the consolidation of what was primarily actually an economic system that was not necessarily reducible to political intentions.

So it was the Soviet Union that was causing trouble based on politics, basically, right?

But now it's the opposite.

The U.S. unipolar system is no longer this economic primarily it's no longer a system primarily based in the development of economic systems or the evolution of economic systems now it's primarily based in this

you know super structure based on the u.s military right fuck this piece of shit you know the tanks

does that look like a tank

probably not

and then if aeroplane Does that look like a tank? Probably not.

And then... Airplanes.

Beow!

There's an airplane!

Wow!

How do I fucking draw an airplane? fucking drawn airplane.

Doing my best.

So tanks and airplanes and the military.

That's a political superstructure. It's no...

So the economic system...

Alexander Kojev was correct. I wrote about this in Alexander Kojev and the Russian Special Military Operation.

More or less, the U.S.

did make progress

in the development of socialism.

So Lenin said,

imperialism is the final stage of capitalism.

U.S. super-imperialism was this kind of like transitional stage between capitalism and a socialist mode of production.

And the Soviet Union in the post-war period,

rather than advancing socialism necessarily,

was actually just resisting the consolidation of the super-imperialist system.

But when the super imperialist system.

But when the super imperialist system did consolidate,

that actually led to the emergence of what all we can call it is the socialist mode of production which exists in china which took which was an evolutionary continuity economically not politically

because people hear the word evolution they go Bern Bernstein. I'm talking about economics.

All Marxists agree that economically, capitalism is evolving to socialism.

Not politically, but economically.

The reformism comes from political reformism and so on.

It has nothing to do with anything I'm talking about.

Anyway, China, China system developed in a continuity from the U.S. global system.

And it actually did succeed

in the

consolidation of the socialist mode of production.

A real objective.

So, you know, people ask me, is Russia socialist?

Yeah.

Yeah, economically, yeah, it is.

Especially after the SMO.

But, yeah, the socialist tendency,

you know,

is dominant in the mode of production within Russia.

Is Russia politically socialist?

Well, no.

Politically, Russia is a democracy.

Politically, Russia is not a socialist.

But socialism is not about political policy at all.

Socialism is an economic system

that is rooted in a systemic logic.

Okay. and that logic happens to be one. Thank you. So this is what I'm talking about.

So that's that. Okay.

So,

infrared's theory is more or less that multipolarity is not only an economic reality today, but that multipolarity equals socialism.

They're the same thing. Polarity refers to the logic of socialist

economics. Polarity is a socialistic economic logic. That's That's what a polar polarity is.

Economic polarity. It's a socialist logic.

Now,

this is our very mundane, boring reality.

Iran's undergoing new private. Privatization doesn't matter.

It doesn't actually matter.

You have to look at the monopoly on the creation of credit, because everything is downstream

from that.

You know, private accumulation that's happening at any level of enterprise

does not become important or a dominant tendency until it rises to the status of

you know

becoming a form of capital

that can

assume the logic of

of credit

or not even just credit

but the kind of credit debt

scissigy that only kind of

state banks or the Federal Reserve

are capable of.

So, there you go.

Um, there you go now I want to talk about revolutionary consciousness

this stream should honestly be like five hours

in terms of like how much I want to talk about

but uh to be like five hours in terms of like how much I want to talk about.

But, uh, fuck, my eyes are fucking hurting.

So, China, I will say one thing that, you know, everyone can recognize, frankly, at the political level, neither China or Russia are revolutionary powers.

China and Russia politically both pursue political reformism when it comes to international affairs. They're not politically revolutionary powers.

So that's a fact.

Now they are geopolitically revolutionary. Russia's SMO was.

And they're revolutionary in the historical and economic sense,

materialist sense, but politically they're not revolutionary.

They don't have revolutionary consciousness.

Yo, Noxter, what's up, man?

Anyway.

So, uh...

You know, not, Knox is not even a groiper, all right?

It's like, you think about it, he's not even a groiper.

He's not even a groiper.

The actual groipers are like an actual thing.

Like, those people, they're all in them telegrams and whatever.

He's not a fucking Groyper, bro.

He's not, like, plugged in with that whole movement.

He's just a fan.

He's an Instagram fan.

Anyway, I'm not going to get into it uh let me let me let me let me let me continue all right so uh where was I?

Yeah, they're not politically revolutionary.

And that's true.

I mean, that's indisputable.

But before anyone criticizes russia and china for being

you know politically reformist uh international affairs for not having the revolutionary consciousness

and this kind of revolutionary spark, that's my primary issue, is the people criticizing them.

Because let me talk about China especially here, because the case of Russia is complex and actually legitimate as well, but it's just more complex.

Especially in the case of China, I think it's fair to say that China did reach the maximum thus far in the history of humanity, the ultimate threshold of what it is possible to maintain as revolutionary consciousness in the 20th century.

There is no

country or civilization in all

of human history

which cultivated, which adopted,

which pursued to its logical

conclusion, and took seriously

on a mass scale at the scale of hundreds of millions of people, the revolutionary consciousness.

And what upsets me is that people don't appreciate China's experience because the retreat

that followed Mao Zedong's death

with respect to that consciousness

and I've talked about this before on stream

but that wasn't because Deng Xiaoping

and Co.

Were, you know, evil traitors who, you know, what?

They were just sellouts or something.

That's not why that happened.

There's a reason almost all of chinese society got the memo and went along with it because it reached a certain limit a limitation right based on its own insufficiencies,

based on its own inadequacies.

So the Chinese revolutionary consciousness

during the cultural revolution

reached a specific limit

because of its own internal inadequacies

because it was unable to resolve fundamental

questions about how do you maintain the correct revolutionary consciousness in the world?

You know, when the material world is at odds with your ideology and with your consciousness, I'm simplifying, but it's like, that's the question. Like, how do you actually reconcile the need to feed yourself with the need to be like a fulfill your revolutionary duty.

I mean, I think that is a starting point for a very important question.

How do you reconcile the pragmatic need to maintain your existence with the duties that revolution, you know, with the obligations compelled by revolutionary duty,

and the kind of revolutionary super ego.

And that doesn't seem like a deep question, but it absolutely is, because the tail end of the

cultural revolution was leading to a point

where the party authority

itself was being undermined.

The CPC was being threatened

as a dictatorship.

Which would have opened the floodgates

of chaos and instability

and like probably U.S. intervention or something, and China would do you know more.

So it's like you're at a crossroads where you have to sacrifice what appears to be your duty, your revolutionary duty, in the name of preserving the very material basis and foundation of being able to sustain your position in the first place. And what did China choose? It chose the latter. China could have chosen to sacrifice itself on the altar, on the altar of ideology, and it instead decided to finally attend to the necessities of its own existence.

China said,

we can flagellate ourselves and beat ourselves up for not being revolutionary all we want,

but we're still pretty hungry and very poor.

And China did what was necessary to attend to the material premises of its own existence as a proletarian dictatorship. I'm not saying they did self-care, but it's like, that was the nature of the retreat.

China said we're going to cultivate our existence, you know, and that's step one.

You know, step one for the revolutionaries, you have to attend to the material basis

and premises of your existence.

This is, you know,

to be profound,

this is the same dilemma

is how can you be a communist

with an iPhone? Oh, you're a communist

and you live in a capitalist system?

See, leftists think that they've, like, mastered these

uh,

quandaries, but actually you haven't.

You really haven't.

Um... I'm not here to necessarily

you know, one of the beautiful things about Deng Xiaoping thought and the reform

and opening up, it's not a triumphant, you know, revolutionary burst of energy.

It's also a somber retreat.

But there's also something beautiful about that.

Tragedy is also beautiful, the acknowledgement of the limits

and the same thing was Stalin's

socialism in one country there was

a somber feeling

and a somber atmosphere that surrounded

the first five-year plan

in the Soviet Union

it wasn't all,

oh, we're fulfilling our

our, you know, our

revolutionary fire and energy. No, it's also

like we can appreciate

the beauty of our revolution now.

We can finally cultivate and consolidate, you know?

And that's a very somber process

because it's like,

you know, that song,

I'm gonna just fucking,

you know,

I'm gonna do something that I deserve to get shot over

because it's so, like, sacrilegious.

But it's like, closing time on a, but you can't stay here.

It's like the party's over.

Now you have to consolidate.

And it's like, don't cry because it's over. Now you have to consolidate. And it's like,

don't cry because it's over.

Smile because it happened.

And like, that's the vibe kind of,

you know?

Um, and that's pretty dark

and somber in a way. But it's also pretty beautiful, you know.

And that's part of the history of Marxism, Leninism.

And it's also the part of the history of Marxism, because Marx, contrary to what people think,

Marx was not a fanatical Jacobin

Marx

elevated

the revolutionary

significance

of the proletariat

he elevated the proletariat to the status of having

world historical significance, precisely because Marx was saying that with respect to the kind

of all-encompassing Hegelian system, you know, of the spirit, he said it's over. He said, this consolidates itself in the very existence of the proletariat materially.

The grand aspirations of the spirit and of Feuerbach for the pure man, it's over.

There's a moment of resignation there that is so crucial to the sensibility and the aesthetic of Marxism and Marxism Leninism,

which is not appreciated by leftists at all. Leftists are still, they're not, it's not that they haven't

learned from 20th century communism. It's that they've never matured from 1789, from bourgeois revolutionary consciousness.

At their best, the Jacobin consciousness was a one, it was a sword of just one thrust forward.

And then Napoleon took the sword and he...

We love Napoleon, of course, in a way.

And it's very romantic and whatever, but it's like...

Napoleon failed.

The Jacobin consciousness

is like, I have the pure revolutionary

consciousness, and I'm literally going to

annihilate the world.

Slow-mo, what's up? And it's like, there's something

cool about that. There's something badass

about that. But something badass about that

but the proletarian

outlook

is a maturation

from bourgeois radicalism

that's why

the Nazis if you want to think about this, Trotskyism and fascism and Nazism,

took bourgeois radical consciousness and refused to mature from it.

And the logical conclusion was the kind of genocidal, destructive outlook that was just based on annihilating everything that was impure, right?

Trotsky was the same.

Trotsky thought that the Russian peasants were too impure.

They weren't the true proletariat, and, you know,

it sounds romantic and badass and cool, but it's just immature fanaticism.

So, you know,

um, You know, we're deficient, and we're deficient in artists, we're deficient in musicians, we're deficient in the architects of the soul, the engineers of the soul, you know, we're deficient in that because it's like really hard for me to communicate this sensibility.

Just American left, they just don't fucking get it, man.

They just don't fucking get it.

It's like, you aspire toward an apocalypse that has already happened and now you need to reflect on it and

and and and what i mean to say is that you need to accept the historical necessity of Deng Xiaoping.

Why did the cultural revolution have to end?

You need to accept there was something about that that was born of the internal limitations of that revolution.

And the same is true for the Soviet experience. And only once you

accept that fact, can you be at peace. And I was at peace. I was at peace. I remember, I said, we already live in socialism, and I'm at peace.

And then what happened, guys?

I told you the story.

What happened to me?

I couldn't fucking sleep anymore when I was at peace.

And that is such a beautiful, profound irony.

Because once you attain peace with history,

no longer the generations of old

weighing on your head like a nightmare

once you let the dead be buried

and you attain that peace

then will you know what it means to be compelled by a higher revolutionary calling

by force i could not sleep My whole vision of world revolution on the second American Civil War was wrought from a physically agonizing condition that was literally my physical body rebelling against

the internal peace that i found in making peace with

how history went. Because

once you make peace

and accept

why what happened

had to happen,

you now take on a burden of historical necessity, which is not subjectively but objectively revolutionary.

Then and only then does everything be clear.

You think I have a subjective enthusiasm for revolution?

None.

I have a somber objective understanding that we are on the cusp and we are in the era of world revolution.

Now we are in the era of world revolution. Now, we are in the era of a profound, destructive, revolutionary

change coming to the U.S. Because for that internal peace to be possible. Don't think

you're going to rest easy

and just go about your fucking day with it.

No. Now

you're going to be confronted and shown

exactly how much violence,

how much turmoil, how much

chaos, how much war and destruction will be necessary for that same

exact sense of reconciliation hegelian reconciliation and peace you attained internally to be reflected

by the world without.

Then and only then will you understand the price of peace.

No more subjective enthusiasm or subjective radicalism.

Now you're actually going to be a real revolutionary.

You know? now you're actually going to be a real revolutionary you know if your revolutionary

subject to if your revolutionary consciousness

is even 1% rooted in subjectivism

it's false

it's not real

only when you acquire and an objective sensibility with respect to the historical

necessity of the world can you actually be revolutionary because when you do

the Hegelian kind of thing

and you say the world is as it is

by objective historical necessity,

only then

do you open yourself,

perilously open yourself

in a way that makes you totally exposed without any safe space

to the burden of acting

the world is as it is by necessity, but

now a burden is imposed upon you to act.

And you cannot take refuge in the past to act now that is a kind of anxiety and turmoil imposed upon you which imposes upon you by historical necessity, by objective historical necessity,

with the burden of acting in a new way. That's where the space of the new emerges when you accept deng's chauping when you accept

Putin and post-soviet russia and the russian federation when you accept why everything had to be what it became,

something incredible happens. The space for a new, not an old, a new revolutionary consciousness emerges and that's what infrared is

something new that wasn't in the cultural revolution we've made our peace with the cultural revolution we've made our peace with the soviet union but there's something new here that wasn't there before there's something unaddressed there's something that remains here a new revolutionary era demands a new revolutionary consciousness

one that is not based on subjectivism and subjective feeling, but an acceptance of the objective reality and

necessity of the world. Because the sword cuts in both ways, when you make peace with and accept the objective necessity of world history

you are now put at odds with a regime and with a system that denies this peace, that continues to insist upon crucifying the population, crucifying the people on the altar of a cruel subjective whim that they confuse for impersonal objective reality.

You are put at odds with a system that won't deliver peace to the world.

The U.S. is acting as a subjectivist terrorist power worldwide.

It's not out of any blind systemic necessity that the U.S. is doing what it's doing.

It's no blind determinism of history.

It's an excessive, subjective indulgence by the rotten pedophile bourgeoisie. You know, our consciousness Our consciousness, our revolutionary consciousness is post, for the first time, post-20th century.

It's the revolutionary consciousness of the 21st century after denchalping and after 1991 in order for the ussr to be restored marxasus must make peace with why its dissolution was historically necessary according to the objective limitations of the CPSU itself.

And we can say we blame Khrushchev. No, we shouldn't blame Khrushchev.

No, we shouldn't blame Khrushchev.

We should go further and deeper.

We should say much of the errors were there in Stalin.

Right. were there in Stalin. Many of them were there in Lenin.

Why?

Because both Lenin and Stalin, although infallible in their historical direction, came out of and emerged out of social democracy.

They carried with them the baggage from European social democracy, baggage that they never actually fully discarded.

That's what puts Stalin on a collision course with Mao.

Mao discovered a revolutionary praxis that outmoded social democracy.

Mao went to the peasants and organized among them an army

and that was the basis of the CPC

Stalin said he's not a Marxist

well that's because Stalin had a social democratic Stalin said he's not a Marxist.

Well, that's because Stalin had a social democratic background.

He never fully discarded. He did break from it through Lenin by proxy, but Lenin and Stalin did not have enough time to reflect upon the rot within European social democracy.

The bastard Karl Kotzky.

You want to blame someone, it began there.

Now, Kotsky did make an innovation, which was important for Marxism.

Namely, out of the subjectivism of theory and ideological consciousness turning that into the logic of a

functioning, objective, political

authority. That's what social democracy

accomplished.

But the way it was done

from the outset, the way that happened, predestined it to revisionism, reformism, and ultimately the liquidation and abandonment of Marxism itself.

So we must rediscover

not just

Marxism

Leninism but all of

Marxism itself

that's what infrared is all about

and that's why I have been put at odds on a collision course

with the gatekeepers of the

you know

American left

who refuse to reflect

upon their errors

or at worst

succumb entirely

you know I was first put on a collision course with the worst succumb entirely.

You know, I was first put on a collision course with these autistic, you know, naive narrative realist MLs, Maoists, but then, you know, it became who, the Democratic Socialism.

Democratic socialism is just an open and notorious acceptance of corruption.

Not a sober acceptance of objective reality and historical necessity, but wink-wink corruption.

It maintains the subjectivism of leftism and combines it

with turning a blind eye in an unprincipled manner

to opportunism, all in the name of what,

or we're being realistic and pragmatic.

No, you're not, you're just being unprincipled.

Your principles should align with your realism.

My principles are rooted in objective reality.

Yours are not. You may be the the the quantum the paradox of the dsa is oh we have a hundred thousand members you have all the people that are out of touch with the masses that's a lot of people sure country of 300 million, you have, you've rounded up all the people who are the most extremely out of touch with the masses. It's not an accomplishment. It's only when an interaction with the masses and we have interacted with masses, no, you you haven't you've interacted with people that have already been educated by the institutions of the u.s. state or the or of civil society those are not the masses the masses are those between the cracks. That's why they're masses, you fucking idiot. They're not masses because it's many individuals. They're masses because they cannot be coded. They cannot be qualified

according to the institutional

means of identifying

populations. That's what it means

to be the masses. You could say

maybe they're U.S citizens but you can you can only

call them the masses when there is an insufficient ability to to identify them according to the logic

of an institution you know if if you're talking about institutionalized

subjectivities those are not the masses the abstract element is the institution in the case of

the masses what's the element of abstraction?

It's a vacuum.

It's that there's an absence.

There's a lack of recognition of the masses.

There's no institution interpolating them.

That's why they're the masses.

They're decoded.

They are just masses.

That the element of abstraction is a wild revolutionary tendency.

But in the case of amalgamating different university students or, or, you know, I don't know, Starbucks or something.

All you're doing is amalgamating different institutionalized subjectivities.

That's not the logic of a mass movement.

It's the logic of fascist corporatism.

You're creating an alliance between different institutionalized subjectivities.

Yeah, that's literally fascist corporatism.

It's the same logic.

The element of abstraction is entirely consolidated at the scale, at the same scale of abstraction of the institution itself. Yeah, that's not the masses.

I couldn't possibly... the masses are what resist

institutionalization.

You know?

So

and it's the whole bullshit

about, you know, intersectionalism

and the diverse coalition

shit.

The whole point is they want to create a black people institution and a Latino Latinx institution, Asian institution.

All these different races and ethnicities need to have their own, you know, institutional representation, this kind of like corporate representation, like in the fascist sense of corporate. And, you know, you just kind of bind them together. know and and that's the unity to lead the masses, as they are, not as they're institutionalized, as they really and truly exist.

As a national reality.

Object, not an institutional nation, a real one.

It's a profound, profound difference.

It's the difference between Mao Zedong and Adolf Hitler.

We are with the party of Mao.

You are with the party of Hitler.

See, this is, what's the difference between ACP and DSA?

ACP is of the party of Mao.

DSA is of the party of Hitler.

Simple as that.

It's all you have to say. you will not save Palestine or Gaza if you cannot attend to the material premises of your own existence.

If you cannot build your own revolutionary party, your own revolutionary movement, among your own people, you will never be worth shit to Gaza or Palestine.

You are of no use to them you can virtue signal on x all you want

you can morally grandstand all you want but ultimately you're worthless to them keep morally grandstanding, keep virtue signaling.

You've done nothing for them.

All these fucking people,

virtue signaling and morally grandstanding at Russia and China.

They sat and watched, like everyone else,

that children and people of Gaza get slaughtered,

and they didn't do a fucking thing about it to make a difference.

Because their head was in the wrong

place the entire time. You are not

Superman. Fuck Superman

and fuck that guy, whatever James

Gunn, that pedophile.

Your focus should be what China

does. Your own country, your own people.

Because if you could do that, you could literally take the entire basis of the genocide against Gaza.

You can wipe it out.

All you have to do is attend to your own business, and you would save Gaza. You can wipe it out. All you have to do is attend

to your own business, and you would

save Gaza. But no, you have the

mentality that you want to be Superman.

That Zionist Hollywood

movie that was created by pedophile

James Gunn that they all love.

I mean Superman! created by pedophile James Gunn that they all love. That's not how fucking works.

You have no use to Gaza if you can't be a leader for your own people.

Liberate America first.

Because you are nothing

to Gaza as an individual.

Nothing.

The only thing you could be for them is a

leader of the American people.

Because it's the American government that is responsible

for the genocide against Gaza. Who lifted a finger for Gaza? In America, nobody. I don't want to

fucking hear a word about people bitching about Russia and China.

Using the DSA gave a fuck about Gaza.

The DSA spent the last three fucking years, debating about whether they want to be Zionists.

They spent the last two fucking years debating about whether they're fucking genocide supporters or whether they condemn it.

What did they do for Gaza?

Who the fuck is any DSA piece of shit

to say a fucking word about China or Russia?

They're literally promoting the fucking democrats you know the bulk of the genocide occurred under biden the democrats are a genocidal party, and they promote them.

You're going to purity test Russia and China?

Fuck you, you piece of shit.

You tell people to vote Democrat.

China does these economic deals with Israel.

That's economics.

You politically support

Zionism, you piece of shit.

I'm going to talk shit about

China.

Because there's Chinese people making money

out of Israel.

Okay.

But who

who put a fucking gun to your head and told people that they should support

zohran momdani and continue supporting democrats did anyone force you to fucking do that

who forced you to fucking do that?

That was a decision of political will.

You are infinitely more guilty, you piece of shit.

It's a big thing, people hating on, oh my God, it's like, it's changing everyone's consciousness.

They're like, oh, my God, China's not Superman.

Yeah, James Gunn is a disgusting millennial pedophile. And Superman is for millennial

retards

who lack taste

in anything. Like, Superman is for

glasses wearing millennial pieces of shit

man children adults that can't fucking grow up

it's a Hitlerite film whose basic premise

is that Zionism is good it just needs a human face

imagine being Nazi Germany is that Zionism is good. It just needs a human face.

Imagine being Nazi Germany.

And you're literally commit, you're killing all the Jews.

You're Nazi Germany.

You're slaughtering all the Jews.

And then some like Nazi hipster makes a movie in Nazi Germany about how this like Nazi hero is saving all the Jews.

How fucking disgusting is that? They literally were satisfied by Superman the movie during while they were sitting in that theater watching a Superman children in Gaza were being bombed and torn to shreds while they were self-satisfied oh Superman is this? Superman is it?

You are a disgusting piece of shit for implying that sensibility and that aesthetic has anything to do with the liberation of the Palestinian people.

It's just to make you feel good and nothing else.

So, stop getting it twisted.

You don't care about Gaza.

You care about making yourself feel good.

Just admit that fact.

You don't care about Gaza. If you cared about gaza you would be you within u.s. politics would do everything necessary to form a competent opposition to the regime.

And yes, if you had to sacrifice transgender and whatever feelings, you would.

You wouldn't even think twice about it.

But you're so fucking picky,

and you have so many of these preferences that you refuse.

So there we have it.

You don't care about Gaza,

because you're a picky little bitch

who only cares about feeling

good about themselves

not about stopping a genocide

Master Yoda what's up

and I have hatred

and disgust in my system

because I remember the

ISIS dogs at Emory I remember the ISIS dogs at Emory. I remember these free Syria ISIS people at Emory. And I remember they're talking about Palestine, Palestine, but holy fucking shit.

I'm calming myself down because I'm going to get so triggered if I think about this.

So I'm... The situation in the Middle East is the most black-pilled, fucked up thing you can imagine

because the free Syria people got what they wanted.

Palestine got sold

Lebanon got fucked

okay no one cares about Lebanon

I guess

but Palestine got mega fucked

because of Joe Lanny

and these same people were canceling me in Jackson because we opposed regime change in Syria

while simultaneously claiming that we're grifters and we're not the true advocates for Palestine,

they are. I true advocates for Palestine. They are.

I didn't know Palestinians didn't need weapons.

I didn't know they didn't need military infrastructure.

I didn't know they didn't need anti-Zionist neighbors.

I didn't know they didn't need material.

See, remember what I told you about revolutionary consciousness?

And how it has to be rooted in objective reality.

It has to be rooted in realism.

Remember what?

This is exactly why.

In the same breath that these people

said, we're more free Palestine than you, Jackson.

Why? Well, you're a grifter and you support Bashar.

Okay, you got what you wanted. How did that help Palestine? How did it help Palestine that

Jolani took power? How was Palestine, how did it help palestine that jollani took power how was palest how did palestine

benefit from the regime change in syria who's going to take responsibility for that no they won't they won't.

They won't.

Because they're disposed of the same leftist infantilism that the Chinese and the Russians moved on from 100 years ago.

Okay? So, and the Russians moved on from 100 years ago. Okay.

So China and Russia don't have patience

for that. And neither do

I.

We did it. We saved

the city. It's like, how did that help?

Did you feel good about yourself that you

toppled Assad did that make you feel good i hope it did but to appraise the material reality

so to speak uh you fucked palestine more than any more than the ua or Saudi or anyone else you free Syria people did

your endless lobbying in the US had you not even been here by the way in the US

you would have even helped more.

If there was no ability for Jolani to normalize with the U.S., maybe they would have been forced to help Palestine.

But you enabled that normalization.

So you...

There you go.

What can I say?

What can I say?

The reason Nick flentes is lapping these people which i mean these people are fascist collaborators so make no mistake they're happy to see Nick Fuentes win. Are you kidding?

You know, Donald Parkins is like a fucking Groyper?

Like, he secretly cheers him on.

He's like, he's part of these weird, like,

group chats.

And I don't even, like,

I don't even fully understand it really but like they have this implicit wink wink thing going on

or like well we don't actually want to win

we're just going to let the right wing win

and I guess they want to be like what

the left wing of this like new and I guess they want to be like what?

The left wing of this new fascist

thing?

Anyway, I could give less of a

fuck.

But it's like, isn't...

I'm not here to moralize I'm rather here to point out

these people do not

take seriously the possibility

of like principled communist leadership or principled

revolutionary leadership.

They, as much as they posture as like moral and revolutionary, they cynically believe

and they see, this is the source of the revolutionary corruption. This is the source of it. Because you can feel good about yourself in your head and then wink, wink, you'll kind of like, oh, but in actual reality where, you know, the right wing wing is winning i'm going to just acquiesce to

that and accept that because well that's just reality like they all they all do acknowledge

there's a reality that contradicts their revolutionary ideals and aspirations and their moral aspirations. They do, they do acknowledge it, they do acknowledge it, but they don't take responsibility. And they enable it. And they say, well, it's not my problem. I couldn't, I could, I can't control it. There's nothing I can do about it.

Yeah, there is. You could start by taking responsibility.

But by taking responsibility, you become tainted by an imperfect world.

And you have to be ruthlessly pragmatic and realistic like Den Xiaoping was.

And you have to compromise your moral values and you have to uh you know you have to have to have a toleration for people saying bad

words and shit no you won't do that you'll continue to be pure in your head. But, you know,

what you really are is corrupt and hypocritical, right?

Yeah, these are the same people calling China Jewish and doing the China Jew edits.

I don't care.

For the record, I don't care.

I don't care about anti-Semitic jokes.

I literally don't fucking care.

But I kind of see how the stars are aligning here. I kind of see how the stars are aligning here

I kind of see how this is all

aligning with my thesis that DSA is going to become

the next like the basis for like a new Nazi movement

in the U.S.

Because what they're going to do is be like, well,

you know, all the forces against U.S.

imperialism are bankrupt.

So we may as well support U.S. imperialism.

And they're going to kind of like make that leap.

And it's going to be very easy for them.

And that's the next step.

And, you know, the theory I have of world revolution, it presupposes an acceptance, A, of the objective reality of economic multipolarity, doesn't mean that the superstructure is multipolar, by the way.

And it's a new 21st century revolutionary consciousness

that must

guide

and lead the world revolution

and

because world revolution

is inevitable. It's happening

geopolitically.

But the world revolution is inevitable. It's happening geopolitically. But the world revolution, I argue,

will cut across not only geopolitics, but it will lead to civil unrest and profound change,

political change, within the so-called global south and the

neutral countries

who are bribed

and corrupted by the U.S. Unipole.

The world revolution will be in Brazil.

It will be in South America.

It will be in Africa.

It will be in parts of Southeast Asia.

It will be in the Middle East.

And it will have to topple the remnants and vestiges of the elites and the bourgeoisie aligned with U.S. imperialism.

There's no other solution.

Like I said, what's the solution to the Middle East?

Revolution.

The axis of resistance has been dismantled so there needs to be a new revolution after the

Islamic revolution in 79 there needs to be a next stage there needs to be an evolution of that

there is no other solution There needs to be an evolution of that.

There is no other solution. I am not a political reformist.

I have no illusion. I'm not a BRICS political reformist.

I don't care about BRICS political reformist.

I don't care about BRICS.

Multipolarity, to me, is a challenge that we must meet through a corresponding consciousness that has not been developed

and which must be revolutionary.

Okay. Well, I hope you guys got enough from today's stream. I'm very not optimistic about the situation in the Middle East, guys.

I'm not...

The axis of resistance was dismantled.

The only thing that...

The only way forward is revolution.

There's nothing else.

And this revolution will rock the world.

And I'm telling you the truth.

But a new revolution means a new revolutionary consciousness a new revolutionary theory this is

something we don't have today and this is something i'm trying to develop this is what

infrared was always about but i'm stuck arguing with people all the time who just have worldviews that have been outmoded by history like a long time ago and nobody seems to be willing to accept the now anyway so that's that

see you guys

thursday

ah by the way i forgot to mention this

guys friday i'm going to be in Chicago.

And I'm going to be, me and Carlos, we're going to be speaking, open dialogue and discussion and debate, hopefully, with the audience.

And it's going to be like an in-person event.

So I'll be there.

Carlos will be there.

We're going to be talking about Zoran Mamdani.

So yeah. run momdani so yeah bye bye bye everybody see you later