EPSTEIN APOCALYPSE + VENEZUELA INVASION NOW? + DARK MA LI + MORE

The

Chodhaphaq

Waphaq Kut

Kut

Kut Kut Kna

Krat

Krat

Kut Kut

Kut Kut Kna

K

K Chuck, and I'm not going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to

get a lot of

I'm going to and uh... uh... uh...

uh...

uh...

uh... bork Yeah! I'm

a

I'm

a That's up the construction of business. Self-destruction system has been activated.

This island will self-destruct in 10 minutes.

All the personnel must evacuate immediately

all the personnel evacuated immediately September 28th, Daylight.

The monsters have

Overtaicing the scene

The I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to

I'm I'm a lot of I'm Oh! Oh! and the uh... uh...

uh...

I'm uh... The 2028

Monsters

The Monsters The Monsters I'm The monsters

I'm gonna

Yeah and I'm a bit of it. I'm sorry I'm I'm sorry I'm

I'm

I'm I'm sorry

This is a good

I'm happy

happy

This is

I'm

The island

Come on Strang

in

Get in

Oh

and

I'm

down and I'm going to be able to be.

Oh, my God's right. I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to

be a lot of I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to be a lot of Thank you. Oh! Puck! Puck!

Tuck!

Tuck! The Just my God. Chachot, Chalkenny. Just my dad.

Cut, my dad. Cut, my dad.

Cut, my dad.

Jock, Jock, Jock, Jock, Jop.

Jop.

My dad.

Joppaq. Mopek.

Joppaug.

Joppaug.

Joppaug

Joppaq.

Poh.

Poh. Jop. Thank you. Oh, my. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,

and and the I'm uh, uh,

uh,

but

uh, and so you know, so That's out of it. That's out of the years. The self-instruction system has been activated.

This island will itself be struck in 10 minutes.

All the personnel must evacuate immediately

all the personnel evacuated immediately Ropters! September 28th Daylife

The monsters have overtaken the team Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. I'm going to be. I'm B. I'm Oh! Oh! Oh! Oh!

Oh! Oh! I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to The

28

Daily The monsters

The monsters have focused

They're going to and so uh... uh...

uh...

the

uh... the and the I'm a lot of my This is out of the sun and the system how he has been happy-backed.

This planet is your son is from here and then to the planet.

All the power now have the trackway to see a-dney and me for the down

on the

right

way and I'm going to be. and so you know, and I'm going to be. Thank you. Yeah! Yeah! Yeah.

Yeah. You know day I'm

I'm going to

my nose

if I blow

will have been

a little

a widow

without a lot

a

woman

now

a

woman

and I'm

a man and I'm and I'm a man and and I'm and I'm We've been enough for us. We're going to see what in my mind.

We've been in love to know we know. I'm going to be able to be so much I'm going to be

I'm sorry

and I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm Oh Oh Oh

Oh I'm

I'm I don't

I'm I don't want to go with that those Oh, no We're looking

Oh,

I'm doing

I'm doing I'm and there was no he don't want to go with

that's all

so a lot

with it

I don't go without

I don't

press up

I don't

I know

I know

I know

and I'm

there was

and

they don't don't don't they don't don't don't don't I don't keep feeling like the devil's no they don't want to go with that devil if I blow will it be a reason that I don't cashed up'm thinking like the devil.

No, we know.

Yeah.

Oh,

for all the life.

Now I can't put a play

Oh

No I'm not I'm going to

I'm

I'm I'm

a little

I know

I'm Will you be able to be a reason I don't want to show

I don't know

I don't know

I don't want to see what they're going to be able to

see you will go and no

and no Oh no

Will it be a baby I don't I don't know Will it be a little I don't

I'm doing

I know

I'm doing

I know seventy four seventy four seventy five 74 75

I was the one to let you know I was the sorry ever after 74 75

I was the one who let you know I was a sorry ever after 74 75 I was the one to let you know I was a sorry ever after 74 75 I wasn't one

I was a one who led to know

I was a story ever after

74 75

Got no reason for come to me and the rain running down.

There's no reason.

And the same voice come to me like it's all slowing down and believe me i was the one who let you know i was a sorry ever turned seventy four seventy five if you made me more and I'll define

because you're really only under

74, 75

It's not easy

nothing to say good I'm ready to say and I'm

ready to say it's never

easy

when I look

down your eyes

and I find

that I'll find

when I look out

your eyes

and I'll say I was the one to let you know I was the song we ever after 74 75 I was the one to let you know, I was a song we ever actor, 74, 75, 74, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, more, Now is the time.

Now is the time. I'm not you know I was just one I was a story

ever actor

74

75

giving me more

and I'll define

because you're really only after

74 75

75 You know, I found a lot of I found a love but get me to mess

One little baby, you're a cute and mass

I can do by the super, I can't do what I do do

I just go ahead and a fuck and a bunch of my knees Come on to come on and come up I'm a big you know what you're going to be able to make me

and go to the house

so I'm a tree

I'm going to get I'm a

I'm going to be able to be.

I'm going to get up. I'm going to get down

in the world.

I want to come to my knees

and go my

my mind.

I'm going to get up.

I'm going to get up.

I'm going to get that I'm in the I'm going to be yours I'm going to get in a lot

I'm getting in a mess

One little baby if I'm shooting back

I just know why I'm glad

What I can do

I can do I'm looking at a bunch of

No I put on my knees

And I love

I'm happy, really and I'm looking at a lot No, I put your money, I want to go My dream

I'm going to love

I'm going to love I'm

I'm talking

I'm looking in your hands

so

I'm going to

get down

for a house I don't know and see a lot and see a

man

go up

and get now

and a

my

need and go

and go and go and

my eyes and

I'm

and I'm

and see you

go and see you go and I'm and a and I'm going to be like to my soul and see a while

I'm going to be a lot of

a lot of I'm going to be able to be able to be. I'm going to be.

What's going to be. I don't know. I'm a lot of the people and love

a big

I'm saying

I'm

I'm I. I'm going to see. I'm going to see. I'm going to go.

I'm going to go.

I'm going to get a I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

I'm a to die I'm going to love

love and it's a bunch of

days

and the people are

a lot of the black

what I can do

like you do like you

do so I'm

so I'm and I'm you're on the money

I'm gonna go

Bye

I'm gonna get up I PORAN BORAN BORAN BORAN BORN PORN PORN PORN PORN POSLAZED URA Burren, burn, From, B'ron'n B'Rone

Ombudsy

Y'amata

Koldurrondur

Y'all'all

the

assol'l Kine,

thirrull

Gael

Y'u' Gell,

y'u'

Y'b' Y'b' Y'b' Y'am down B'am yawful. Hey, hey, hey, yeah,

I'm a bitrulled downbole.

Dirmatiguan, shup shir

car at durr, but

yawuslick,

bashed up,

cool to yarm,

do you know,

yackshelick,

and yackshelick, the yckshelick and yaggillik

and the other

there's

there

there's

there there

there I'm Burl,

Burl,

carl,

carl,

the

God, the

of the

hall of

Gill,

ha,

ha,

y' ha ha ha hoz-g--go--ol'-o-o-y-o-o-y-bo-lid-he, hey, yvok-purn, naw-lid. I'm a-wark-move-d'-dhurn, I've been'm I'm men

Thee

Man gillik Tams Bailhen

Jone

Herbewain

Big Borund Herbatt

Ely

Isen

Yusin Yer

Yen

Yer

Yolan

The Hulan Hul Rely

Rhy yu'll my hulke is in Yenna back I'm Yeah Oh Yeah The Jets is man and Kloyaland, you're heiard, you're I'm in the caroling

I'd keep up

I'm gonna'

Yulehurt Yorahua

Thouan goal Thurrilug

Yarratow

Halkind

Yeratow

Dellin

Tograwe Ode Leneu' Tohra'u' Tohra'u'd

Toh'r'n'n' From' Then, I was the way of Uralbath

Uralbath

Yolal' Yeah, I'm a riverdalabal. Oh,

Pah, p, t'rush,

our owasy,

the,

call,

hilly,

jolololars, the

ha'all of

the

the

ha'r, the

the

of the wall there, I'm Toshone our Ovasily

Kondon

The

Kovolam

and The sunerun, baron, boron, boron, borne

Theirchlandish ovation,

Ura, Routa,

Theololars' Theolars'

Kine thurr'r hulik

Y'w'uze'

Gell, y'uolip

Hey,

Y'ibe,

Yabur

Galbole,

D'boh

D'n'te

Degan, Y'bati Irmened-digin'-ir-by-shy-shyms ch'-o'-wraughts'n't

ba'-shoulde harrap-doer me?

Jocchill'n't-yckshelike-y-l'-dur-d'-l-bar.

Yaw-uslick'-haw-s'-hull-bar. I was a lot of Karj, I was the Gha-Arj, I was the Gator, Ghanelabar. The I'm I'm I'm gosh yeah

I'm

I'm jololing

on the asses

I'm

who

people

love come God

come

y'

y' y' y' I

have

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm John Erebewen Big Boron Herbather

Elyrism

Yerrater

Mottottor

Oolan

The whole man

Theean

Hulkin Yenotr Andetur The The The What's the moon? and the I'm not

I'm

and

I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm going to be able to be. And I'm going to

I'm going. I'm Oh I'm I'm

I'm

I'm gonna go

and a lot of

I'm going to and

I'm happy I'm I'm I'm

I'm a so a

I'm

I'm

a lot of and the other than the I'm not

a lot of

I'm and and I don't know

I'm

No

No Oh, no, no, no, no, no.

No, ro, ro, ro. Oh. and I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm Fuck is up, everybody.

First of all, we up to a great start.

It's a great start, okay?

I mean, Australia was Australia with the 10.

Okay, we got Midwest Singh with the 10.

We got Corvids sending 100 kick tokens.

I don't know what the hell that is, but thank you, bro.

We got Vortex with the 10.

You know what I mean?

We got October broadcast, no, with the 10.

Okay, what's up, y'all?

Steven Saint with the five,

Comrade Kid with the five.

These are the pack leaders, y'all what I'm telling you know what I'm talking about?

We're crabbing it up in this bitch even before the crab has left the fucking building.

What up y'all? This is my new outfit forever. This is what I wear now. I'm a certified

Molly Grandmaster. Okay, you know what I mean? I'm the...

They call me...

You know what they call me?

They call me the...

The Master Shifu of Marxism-Leninism.

They call me the Master Shifu of Mali.

For you, I'm Master Shifu.

You understand?

So, I wear this 24-7. This is where I wear everywhere.

I wear it at the gym. I wear it everywhere I go, I wear this shit, you know?

This is what I wear. This is my, this is, this is,

welcome to the new world.

It's dark in this bitch, by the way.

It's dark.

It's tinted.

Dark, what's up?

Dark energy.

What's up?

What's up?

Dark energy.

Juzon.

With the five.

What's up,

Juzon?

That's what it's all about okay

i want to tell you guys some okay the thing with the shades we have to start normalizing that

we got it's got to be dark we got to be looking

to bring the light to others

the power of the sun

to unleash the power of the sun

we got to be able to see

you understand

high level thinking I'm on some high level thinking okay but uh no in all

seriousness we've got said this is very serious of course yo comrade Comrade Jacobich.

What's up, bro?

How you doing?

Yides, what the fuck?

You know, I'm all, we got to hype everything and we have to cover everything.

We have to treat it like news so that it's content, I guess, and yada yada.

But to be completely honest, it's just the least surprising thing I've ever.

There's nothing about this that shocks me or surprises me.

As a matter of fact, I would be surprised and shocked if this was released and, like, there was nothing.

So we've got Larry Summers, the guy from Google.

There's all sorts of weird things.

But just to show you who was proven correct about Lula and Noam Chomsky, they were in that shit, too.

Lula and Noam Chomsky were friends of Epstein.

This guy Epstein, I mean, what did he do that was...

What were people consulting him for?

Like, what was he doing?

You know, thing.

Noam Chomsky.

Is he still alive, by the way?

Yeah, Tom Barak.

The guy who's, you know, that idiot Tom Barak?

The guy who's going to Lebanon and he's like, you know, the French and the British, they carved up the Sykes-Picot and it was a disaster.

You know, the people, the, the way that the people in the Middle East are going to thrive is by having these monarchies, like the, like, um, you know, the UAE andudi arabia that's the model for the middle east and then i'm like what a cursed fucking timeline holy shit and by the way uh chomsky okay

noam chomsky was on some crazy shit is he alive but he's still alive all right so i'm not

speaking ill of the dead when i say noam chomsky what were you doing with Jeffrey Epstein, bro?

He's barely alive.

I mean, bro, to be honest, to be honest with you,

they had Stephen Hawking on that fucking island, all right?

They had Stephen Hawking on that island.

They had Stephen Hawking in that wheelchair

on that island.

that dude is was a cyborg he was literally like on that chair on that island bruh they were bringing him okay so you're telling me tromsky's 90 well stephen hawking

in that chair who's

Microsoft Sam is that what it is it was literally

Microsoft Sam Stephen Hawking used to talk as

Microsoft Sam, okay?

And they had him in that bitch, okay?

Some wild shit, bro.

Some wild ass shit.

And, you know,

I don't even know the ultimate

question is this. This is what I'm going to actually

talk about here. What I'm going to talk about is very

simple. Okay, because by the way, the thing,

there's stuff about Trump in there.

We, which we all knew. I mean, none of that is a surprise. Now, the million dollar question is, is there anything that's going to happen as a consequence of it?

Of everyone finding out that we're literally ruled by pedophiles. Is there any, is

going to be any consequences? Is there anything going to happen? Is there going to be any repercussions

of any kind? Are people going to do anything about it?

Will people care?

Alas, you know,

this is a regime that has no credibility

and is regarded as pedophiles by everyone.

I'm not even just talking about the Trump administration, the whole regime.

But nothing's going to happen.

I wish I could be like a liar like Scott Ritteritter, and just bullshit, and bullshit for views and likes, and just tell you a bunch of nonsense.

But I'm here to tell you the truth, and the truth is, doesn't seem like anything's going to happen as a consequence of these revelations at all.

And they know that, and we know that.

And on and on it goes.

Now, apparently, it's just, I guess, it contributes to the moral corrosion of our civilization that we just don't have morals.

But in any case, guys, Venezuela, apparently they've authorized strike action against narco terrorists and cartels.

And they have about three, was it three, aircraft carriers right in front of on the shore of Venezuela, ready to go, ready to attack.

And this is what we're dealing with, right?

Like, imminently. I heard it with, right, like imminently.

I heard it was happening tonight, by the way.

So we'll see if that happens.

And is this a popular war?

No, it's not.

Is this type of interventionism?

But they don't care.

They don't care what's popular or what's unpopular.

Again, you know, a lot of people talk about the radical shift in this generation, in terms of their moods and their consciousness.

But that's not all that consequential if it's not able to be affected into any kind of action, which I don't see it actually is.

Can I actually expose Gen Z and put Gen Z on

blast? Gen Z doesn't have willpower. Gen Z is probably the most passive generation in history, which is saying something.

Gen Z doesn't have the will to go against the flow.

So like Gen Z have opinions that are very radical and Gen Z will like

and consume certain content

and they will

they'll go on TikTok whatever

but Gen Z

is not about to like stand

on some shit

at least for now you know that's, that's the, that's the issue.

It's like, people are talking about how in the Republican Party, it's all full of these

Gen Z. Roypers.

Okay, but those people are not simply hiding their power level.

They are too socially anxious

to even go against whatever the room is.

They're not going to stick their neck out for anything.

They're not going to actually act upon anything.

And that's true

for the Democrat interns. It's true

for the Republican interns.

Whatever you want to call it.

Gen Z are on some fake

demon shit. They're like super edgy on the

internet for sure. But in

real life, they

don't have willpower, they don't know how

to exercise authority,

and they don't know how to take

initiative. And that's, I'm telling you the truth.

Like, I'm not even saying this to demonize them.

Like, it's just straight up the truth. They're, they're very,

very passive. They're like, you know what, straight up the truth. They're very, very passive.

They're like, you know what? They're like broccoli.

They're like broccoli. They're like cabbage.

A lot of y'all not going to like hearing that a lot of them are not going to like hearing that

but i shit on millennials all the time i shit on gen x i'm a shit on everybody i shenzy as well

they're straight up on some cauliflower shit they're straight up on some broccoli shit

they're straight up on some broccoli shit.

They're straight up vegetables.

They got social anxiety.

They got awkwardness. They got

nervousness. They got inability to

interact.

They've got

all sorts of fucking

problems, all right?

And

don't, I don't, I hate

hearing people who are constantly on

some, oh, Gen Z is going to change

everything. Gen Z's going to change everything. Gen Z is going to change everything.

How?

You know, that's what I want to know.

I want to know how.

How is Gen Z going to change a fucking thing?

Okay.

Tell me what's actually going to happen, because I see the shift in opinions is very clear. There's a shift in consciousness. Sure. But how is that translate into reality? What does that actually amount to? How is that affected into? Gen Z may be less enthusiastic to participate in politics, which I think we're starting to see.

They may not want to vote as much.

They may patent.

Gen Z, honestly, you know what, the reason everybody's losing their mind over Gen Z.

Because, like, Gen Z is like Beavis and Butthead.

That's straight up the generation.

Beavis and Butthead generation.

Because all they do is give passive support or passive...

What's the opposite of support passive like rejection i guess

but nothing is ever active with them it's literally like bevis and buthead like

gen z is straight up just being like

Huh.

Yeah, passive dissent.

They're like,

Ah,

Israel sucks.

Ah,

Israel sucks.

And then, like,

you got these, like,

Zionists,

like,

losing their mind over this shit. Like, like, you got these like Zionists, like, losing their

mind over this shit. Like, oh,

my God, the anti-Semitism.

Oh, my God.

Oh, my God. This is...

Oh, my God.

Israel. And, like, Gen Z's just in there, like,

Beavis and Butthead

Ha, you suck

Huh, fuck you

Like, but it's just passive. It's not active. That's the thing.

It's funny. It's funny seeing this

interaction going on with the generations,

but like let's not dilute...

Those of us who are about some real-ass shit, those of us on some serious shit, which we are, should not be deluding ourselves about the capacity for this current generation to actually do anything in practice or in real life.

That is unfortunately something that's going to have to be cross-generational.

It's going to have to involve other generations.

And millennials, see, you know, millennials do act, but all they know how to do is shit themselves in public.

The problem with millennials is that they are willing to act. They are willing to do things,

but all it ever amounts to is pooping their pants in public. So we need probably a cross-generational

type of collaboration

where we can actually

act effectively, not just

I agree

the cultural revolution should start

from the youngest generations. The youngest

generation should lead the shift in

consciousness for sure.

But learning how to act, learning how to actually organize and do things in real life with competency, that's going to take across generational effort and alliance

but i i do believe in generational warfare in the realm of culture and consciousness i think

millennials are coping i think gen x are coping i think that boomers are coping. I think Gen X are coping. I think that boomers

are coping. I think that

Gen Z is

also starting to cope

when it comes to BrainRot. They invented the term

brain rot. It's the type of slander

against

Tung Tong Suhore, which is very powerful.

Anyway, the problem is that we need to tear down all forms of modern coping.

And each generation has their own form of cope that they use to defend their sensibilities

against the cultural de-territorialization

that is coming from the next

degeneration, right? So they're all just

like coping and like, oh, I've got it

figured out. I'm cool. No, you're fucking not.

Okay. Tung-Tung-Sahor right now

is the coolest thing.

I think.

No, it's not, actually.

There's a new thing.

The new thing is, uh, it's that beautiful song.

It's that song.

It's that song.

You know about that shit?

Y'all know about that shit?

I'm just so cutting edge.

Y'all don't even know about that shit.

No, it's not 6-7.

It's some other shit.

There's some shit going on.

You don't know about it.

All right.

That's okay.

I'm cutting edge.

I know about that shit.

So that's...

And that's actually completely meaningless.

By the way, but here we are.

Here we are. Here we are.

We have research.

Who the fuck is we, bro?

Here we got Sigma Gorilla on some same shit he's always been on.

Bro, who is we?

Who is we? What are you talking about?

What do you mean we?

Who is we? Y'all are a collective now?

This is a group that I'm dealing with now.

It's bad enough that there's one of y'all.

Now there's a we involved.

There's an entire group.

Who the

fuck is saying this shit?

Or maybe you got split personality

disorder. That's fine.

Anything. anyway y'all um um i have some shit i want to talk about for sure

uh that of course you're talking about the headlines.

The headlines, the headlines.

I don't give a fuck about headlines.

Can I tell you the truth?

I like talking about real shit.

I like talking about real shit.

I don't like talking about headlines.

Long guy, what's up?

What's up with the three?

Appreciate you.

I feel very exhausted when it comes to headlines because they're all just kind of

fucking boring. Okay?

I mean...

Did you hear about this? Did you hear

about... did you fucking hear about

nothing ever happens because for you know i i'll let you know when something happens all right

but i want to talk about dark molly because I feel like we didn't have a proper discussion

not a discussion I didn't give you a proper introduction about Dark Molly

last stream so I would like to talk about that

you know but um

so you got to strap in and you got to be patient

and you got to actually listen to this shit okay

because this is some

some real as shit you all ready

y'all ready

let's not overhype Dark Mali.

Dark Mali is just an aesthetic.

Dark Ali is like an art.

Dark Mali is just...

Dark Mali is just an art movement.

You know, it's our response.

I want to lay out the goals of Dark Malie so that it's pretty, it's like it's clear what this is actually for and what it's about.

Dark Malie is a art movement. It's an aesthetic movement that we're trying to launch

in response to something.

Stalin, Beria Gulag with the 10.

What's up, bro?

I never get tired of saying that name.

Real stranger.

What's up?

Um... name real stranger what's up um um in response to something that is probably the number one problem with communism in the USA right now.

Why?

Let's be honest.

Our shit is not popping right now.

I'm going to fucking give you guys a wake-up call.

You guys, you know what you need to see me.

You need to see me as the head artiste. see me You need to see me as the head

Artiste

Y'all need to see me as the head artiste.

Okay?

Y'all need to take my shit series

When I tell y'all this is what you gotta do

This is what you gotta make

This has got to be the vibe

Like understand

That's like,

I know what I'm fucking doing.

All right? Y'all got to, you got to listen to me.

I'm the head artiste.

You understand? I'm the head artiste.

Anyway, I thought it wasn't a call.

Who the fuck said this shit ain't a cult?

Who said that? This is a cult, motherfucker.

But we need to be a cult that spreads this influence and affects the world.

Can't be a fucking circle jerk, right?

So, let's talk about it.

Yeah, is the head artiste.

I want to talk about this.

So the number one problem with the communism vibes in the USA is that communism is too good. And it seems like you're a carebear. Communism is associated with care bears. Communism is associated with naive libtards and John Lennon. That's the fucking issue,

okay? So communism is associated with naiveness and a naive sense of the good. So we have to,

we're launching the Dark Mali movement as a way to embrace the dark unconscious

side of communist history.

That's really what it fucking is.

Like, we're not going to allow right wingers to wag the dark aspects of

communist history in our faces as if we're

a bunch of fucking naive libitards

who don't already know about that and be like

oh you and you know everybody

thinks they're like a head you think

you're fucking already know this

but that's why you're an arrogant fuck.

And I'm casting a spell on your bitch ass.

Bob, bitch, fuck y'all.

You know, I just cast it a spell on y'all.

Welcome to the schizophrenic homeless stream, bro.

I'm on some crazy shit right now.

I'm casting a spell on y'all. Fuck y'all for that shit.

For your arrogance. Because you may be in a state of consciousness that's like, okay, you're preaching to the choir like I already know.

But listen to what I'm saying. Like, out of 10 Americans, no, 19 out of 20 Americans, okay, easily, probably 99 out of 100, to be honest.

99 out of 100 Americans,

their whole take on communism is that

it's a great idea,

but in practice

it turns out to be

scary and dark.

Like,

I'm telling you,

it doesn't matter

how much you're a

Stalinist,

it doesn't matter

how much you're

an infrared,

right or die, it doesn't matter how much you're a Stalinist. It doesn't matter how much you're an infrared ride or die.

It doesn't matter how much you're like a real motherfucker. It doesn't matter how much you yourself

within your consciousness have come to this journey where you can be like

you know,

um, you know, like, say loft goes hard as

fuck. Like you can be in that state of your consciousness right now

but humble yourself and understand where the american masses are at the american masses are at a place

where they they think communism looks good on paper in practice, it's dark and scary.

So that's why it's like hard for our shit to grow.

It's easy for fascist aesthetics to grow because like everyone's like, well, fascism is

dark and scary

on paper and in practice

and you know in a time

where people are

interested in exploring and

embracing the dark

and scary aspects and brutal aspects

of our brutal reality and you know and just

being like enough bullshit enough illusions of this liberal order you know let's kind of let's be

honest with ourselves about our dark brutal reality right um fascism is more compelling

than communism is like because people see fascism is like strong because it's like oh

these are some bad motherfuckers on some bad shit and then you know communism

is the nice guys and what the fuck's

going on guys we are the ones

so it's stop and then it makes us look

worse when like

we look like we're naive

and like care bears

and then they're like oh but look at all this dark shadowy scary shit from your history

so it's like dark ma lee

is about us reappropriating and embracing

and aestheticizing the dark and unconscious aspects of communist history.

Emphasis, by the way, on unconscious.

Now, among the artists that I shared in my compilation on the tweet that launches this movement

is not even necessarily communist artists.

One of them was the, I forgot their brothers,

I forgot their names,

but they made the cover for Boris Groes' total art of Stalinism.

It's literally Stalin sitting next to like E.T. or something, right?

And that's the type of shit we need to like take seriously.

We need to take seriously post-talk or retrospective, you know, like socialist surrealism, like a type of retrospect on communist history that does explore the unconscious dimension that is not on the surface.

We need to do that.

That's why, why do you think we draw so much

from ancient history and like

the Mongols and shit? Well, because it's like

beyond the surface

of a strictly modern ideology

and outlook, there are unconscious dimensions and associations

which do have a deeper resonance across history that do make them much deeper, much deeper,

much more like metaphysically a substantive and, you know, even, even cosmic in their significance, right?

And that's the aspect of, you know, if you ask, honestly, like, think about think about like what separates infrared

from like these

greek

these greek larper

like dogmatists

like soy foliolysm

for all or whatever

and like all these other fucking retards on

YouTube like what separates me from them well some

people will be like oh well huss is a dougainist and he's a well no the truth is is that

I'm actually not a coping retard about the 20th century you know ultimately guys

here's the truth

I mean this is the truth

as much as we

accept the continuity of Chinese Marxism-Leninism and embrace Xi Jinping thought.

If I thought Xi Jinping thought sufficed for all of humanity to face this future that's ahead of us,

I would not even bother with infrared. The truth is, Xi Jinping thought is an important chapter of China's history.

But as far as a comprehensive revival of communism on a planetary scale and of the tradition of Marxism, Leninism, in particular, the next generation is going to need something deeper, something more comprehensive, and not just based on the continuity of history, but based on a re-examination of history, and a rediscovery of a forgotten and lost history because here's the truth and i never

actually talk that much in depth about my take, right? Because I have a lot of views

that align me with Maoism. To be clear,

I have a lot of views that align me with Maoism.

First of all, I have no

I have absolutely no patience

or sympathy with Bukharan sympathies in Marxism.

I think there's a lot of like Chinabu Marxists today who put some glasses on

and they're like

I'm just a pragmatic

South Sala'ath

Bukharan like

I fucking hate y'all

don't don't even go near me

fuck y'all

like literally get out of my face

I have a lot of views

that align me

with Maoism, for sure.

And I'll

tell you something that I ride or die

with, and there's a reason I promote

Dongping Han and stuff.

Mao was

right.

And all of Mao's, like, in all of his confrontations with rival figures within the CPC, I side with Mao.

Mao was correct.

I defend Mao.

I defend the Great League Forward, I defend the cultural revolution. I defend Mao. I defend that revolutionary experience. But do you want to know the actual reason why I defend Deng Xiaoping? The reason why I defend Deng Xiaoping. The reason

why I defend Deng Xiaoping

is because I think

that rather than

Mao getting betrayed by

Deng, rather than

Mao getting betrayed, and

Deng Xiaoping being a revisionist,

Deng Xiaoping emerged as a consequence of Mao's own limitations.

You know, I think Slavoie Zhijak has written about this a little bit,

and I don't fully, I don't fully like endorse his, his, um,

specific analysis that, like, it's because of Mao's dialectic is, you know, inferior to the

classical Hegelian kind, But it is related to that.

Absolutely, it's related to that.

Mao did not have a place for the third term of the dialectic within his outlook.

And it was the very limitations of the revolutionary experience under Mao that made Deng Xiaoping's reforms necessary. So I defend Deng Xiaoping as historically necessary. Rational and historically necessary. Deng Xiaoping was a rational historical necessity.

And so I, this is what separates me from Maoists.

I am a, I am a Maoist in some sense that like I agree.

I'm against these glasses wears who are like, no, Mao fucked up with, you know, and in the two-line struggle.

And the culture revolution was one giant mistake.

No, no, I totally disagree with that.

I totally disagree with that. I think that's historical nihilism. Okay? The thing is, Deng was loyal to Mao, and Mao protected Deng throughout his entire time and power.

But Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up was a direct conclusion from Mao's revolutionary line.

And that's where I disagree with Maoists.

I disagree with Maoists in their false notion that the CPC, after, you know, the gang of four was overthrown,

became revisionist and became illegitimate,

and that, you know, China is ruled by a revisionist clique,

and that China has betrayed socialism,

and that China is no longer a proletarian dictatorship.

I fully reject that perspective because it brushes over how that is what fidelity to Mao Zedong thought looks like. There was no other choice.

Today's China

is a

consequence of Mao Zey Tung.

It's not a betrayal of Mao. There is a consequence of Mao Zedong. It's not something, it's not a betrayal of Mao.

It's con- there is a continuity with Mao that's there.

That might have been inconvenient

if if Mao was still alive, maybe he would have regarded as inconvenient,

but nonetheless that that is the limit.

That's where it met its limit, and it is logical and rational and necessary in that perspective.

Is this position of yours any different from the official CPC position?

There's a lot of different views in the CPC about this.

It definitely would not be a view that would be like banned or, you know, not tolerated by the CPC, but there's just a, like, a huge diversity

of views in the CPC. Now, this is another thing I wanted to address. When Deng Xiaoping said, Mao was 70 percent good and 30 percent bad i actually agree with that

but it's not because i think that that 30 percent has anything to do with mao's decisions

or excesses.

No, I think the 30% that makes Mao wrong

had more to do

with his revolutionary outlook

and his Marxism being incomplete, Mao's revolutionary mission expounded into consciousness and into theory was never completed. And to that

extent, he was 30% wrong.

Mao was

30% wrong because

his endeavor to cynicize Marxism was cut short.

And he didn't really...

I mean, he kind of understood this,

but he never saw where the blind spot was.

And to me, the blind spot is very clearly...

The lack of a comprehensive totalizing universal conclusion at the end of it that situates Marxism

within a comprehensive universal history of mankind and reconciles it with that, for example,

right? So, I fully defend Mao Zedong, like fully, you know,

but no, it's not that he was too pragmatic.

You're misunderstanding me if that's what you think, you know?

I think Mao's dialectic was very dualistic.

And I'm more, I think that the completion of the dialectical outlook requires a dialectic that, rather than dualistic, rediscovers a notion of the one or oneness that is itself latent with the possibility for accounting for change and development.

And that is what I think is the final fulfillment of Marxism and Marxism-Leninism.

The abandonment of dualism, and even in some sense, the abandonment of dualism and even in some sense the abandonment of the notion of contradiction in favor of a new notion of the object objectivity or oneness which is capable

of accounting

for the reality of change.

So this is what interests me, you know,

or this is what I consider,

infrared believes that Marxism-Leninism was never fully synthesized.

If you want to know like what makes us revisionist or something, Marxism-Leninism, although synthesized by virtue of concrete practice, although having proven its reality through practice, having proven itself as real and so on and so on.

In the realm of consciousness,

I'm talking about in the realm of consciousness,

a full

comprehensive synthesis

was never accomplished.

And then most MLs

will tell me well that's ideal

that's kind of metaphysical because

it can never be fully synthesized because

for as long as reality changes

consciousness too must change

right so the notion of a full

synthesis is ridiculous because every turn of

history demands a new synthesis and i i don't think that is entirely wrong, per se.

But when I'm talking about consciousness,

I'm not necessarily talking about something as superficial

as something that could be changed or adapted

to new or different historical circumstances.

I'm rather talking about an original revolutionary impulse, let's call it that, which I do think transcends history. And that's why I'm a Marxist

Leninist who's not uncomfortable talking about ancient history and the revolutionaries of ancient history. And I'm not uncomfortable talking about ancient history and the revolutionaries of

ancient history. And I'm not

uncomfortable talking about Mongols.

And I'm not uncomfortable talking about

religion. Because I think

there is an essence

to Marxism-Leninism that is

in common with the revolutionary traditions of all humanity's history, that in some sense transcends history.

And the knowledge of this essential reality, let's call it that, knowledge of this essential reality, knowledge of this essential reality is is something that transcends history but can only be arrived at through a specific response to your own concrete, real historical circumstance.

So I agree. The revolutionary outlook and the theory has to be synthesized according to new and novel historical circumstances. And there's never

going to be a doctrine or an idea that's eternal. I totally agree with that. But on the other hand,

there is a certain responsivity to history that, when achieved in the here and now,

concretely, echoes eternal into the past.

So you can say the struggle that I'm waging right now is the exact same one.

That Mao, that Stalin, that Lenin, that Marx, Engels, the French revolutionaries, you know, the various nomadic revolutions in history, the prophetic traditions, all sorts of other revolutionary events within history

share. It's the same one and in its essence, it's the same.

So the notion of a common essence that transcends history is not something that is conventionally accepted within marxism at all and yet it is

something that i believe is necessary for marxism today um again i don't think today.

Again, I don't think it's metaphysical because the essence in question is not, and it's not an idea. Okay.

So it's not an idea, okay? So it's not like a form of thought, okay?

But it is something that is universally common to all civilizations and all history across time.

If you want to put it this way, what I basically think is that every unique and particular

historical epoch

nation and civilization

and people

these are diverse contexts

of the

of social

total divisions of labor these are diverse

forms you know, total divisions of labor. These are diverse forms of social existence, right? Whether they're historical or whether they're

geographic and cultural and civilizational. I think that these are different puzzles.

Each puzzle has a different configuration.

So there is definitely a difference.

There's a different logic even.

The logic is different.

The configuration is different. The logic is different. The puzzle fits together in different ways. But when resolved, when it does fit together, it's all the same thing.

The pieces might be different. They might fit together in different ways. They might interact in different ways. But at the the conclusion when they finally are resolved and achieve

their purpose it's the same fucking thing so i literally think for example that jesus and the early christians in some refined sense

had the exact same revolutionary content as lenin. The circumstances are completely different. The material conditions

are completely different. The history is completely different. But there is a shared essence

as far as a relationship to being in general to all of history

as it as it stretches backwards and more importantly as it echoes forwards you know in some sense i think that

jesus christ you know or or anything you know like like sparticus marks like sparticus right the slave

revolution of sparticus when they fighting, they weren't just, you know, aligning themselves with

a revolutionary tradition from the past. In some sense, Jesus was proclaiming himself as part of the same kingdom as lenin thousands of years later and mao he was

aligning himself not just with the past profits but also the future right and um when we fight today our

revolutionary struggle we project a certain existential modality that does echo also into the future.

So this is what I think today.

So I think something wrong, something went wrong in 20th century Marxism.

Something that began with what we call social democracy, right?

Something went wrong there.

And you could say Marx and Engels were the ones who started it.

But that would be kind of unfair because they just didn't say enough.

To whatever extent they did

write and, you know,

um,

theorize.

They died fairly correct, but there's a lot that was unsaid.

And social democracy, in large part, filled that vacuum.

But something is fundamentally wrong from the beginning.

The reason there were contradictions within socialism, as Mao put it,

is that there was something unaccounted for,

and something Marxist-Leninists got wrong

and it's not even in terms

of

the correct practice.

It has more to do with the ability to reproduce consciousness correctly.

How do you reproduce the original revolutionary flame and the original revolutionary

spark of consciousness.

That really is what got lost

after the 20th century.

Marxism, Leninism, as a modality

and as a logic, did not get lost russia operates today unconsciously

and in and accidentally on the logic of marxist leninist politics. So does China.

More intentionally, I guess.

And even some countries that aren't

nominally

inheritors of communist states

legally, or

communist states at all.

So the logic of Marxism, Leninism, and the logic of proletarian dictatorship

prevailed objectively after the 20th century.

That's the great irony. It did prevail objectively.

So much so that the

entire MAGA movement and

Trump's, Trump as a political

person and as a phenomena,

was a farcical

reflection.

And this is what got us a lot in trouble because we acknowledged it in the

Maga communism memes. But it's true. Trump and the Maga movement absolutely was this farcical

reflection of the objective victory of Marxism-Leninism on a planetary and

civilizational scale. There were so many aspects of it that were just these farcical kind of

caricature mimicries of it.

Um... mimicries of it. So that much is secured.

Marxism, Leninism's dent on history

will never, will never be reversed. It's irreversible. It's absolutely irreversible. But what has been lost or forgotten is the original revolutionary spark within consciousness.

That is what's forgotten. That's what we don't have today.

And that's what infrared is interested in igniting and rediscovering. And, you know, look, and let me just be frank about

something. I do avow myself with the belief of having rediscovered it. I do have that insanity.

I do believe I've rediscovered it. What I struggle with is

communicating it myself. I mean, I know for a fact, we joke about being a cult and shit,

but it is kind of a problem that, you know, for a lot of you, I am like your only source of morale okay which is not a good thing

amyla what's up with the 10 if I disappeared for one or two or three months I know that a lot of you

would quickly lose morale.

And your ability to

like believe in this

shit

would be

severely severely curtailed.

And

um that's not okay and um

that's not

that's actually like pretty depressing to me

and I'll tell you why in a second

but um

that's because you see me as living, I'm a living, I'm a living, breathing proof of it.

If somebody who's like actually crazy enough to believe in this shit, right?

So if I have this confidence and i have this belief

it inspires many of you to have the same but without me a lot of you would just not be able to

retain it and that's a problem it's a problem because i'm not going to live forever okay first of all it's a problem because I'm not going to live forever okay first of all it's a problem because

eventually I probably will need to be offline for a long period of time. It's a problem because I, um, because we need a party and an

organization that has, um has systemic redundancy.

Things would just work better

if more people

could have or discover

authentically the revolutionary consciousness

without it simply just flowing directly from me if if others could

independently discover that correctly that would be that would help us grow immensely. And ideally, you know, the whole goal for me is that

this small community we have, I want every single member of this small community to be a node

within a systemic redundancy that like you guys would not need me necessarily

right and it's like the some of the things that discourage me about my book that I'm writing, and that's why I was writing the book, and it's why I still want to write it.

But I do find it discouraging sometimes because, like, people have a tendency to just not...

There's something about how I came onto to this shit that's just like, I, I don't think a book alone, like, awakened me in the way that I was awakened.

There's nothing I could just read that would have like awakened me to where I am now, you know?

It's, there's a lot of like indescribable aspects, or not indescribable, but more like non-reducible aspects to the development of consciousness,

that have more to do with like, first of all, a very difficult confrontation which frankly most people in these circles don't have right a confrontation with like doubt you know like revolutionary doubt, like

genuinely facing, like,

am I actually crazy?

Is Marxism for me just a psychological

cope for something else?

How do you draw up internally,

you know, the sense of necessity

that guides you?

And I, sometimes I try to ask people this

to gauge their seriousness.

And I guess I'm giving the trick away now,

but I'll ask people this to gauge their seriousness.

And whenever I hear anybody tell me some shit where they're like, oh, well, I'm motivated because, uh, you know, uh,

throughout my life, I, you know, had these experiences.

Um... And these experiences...

It's like, well...

I don't take that seriously at all.

I really don't.

Um... I don't take that seriously at all. I really don't.

Because your experiences are pretty ubiquitous and they're not unique.

They're likely not unique, right?

So if you're saying that the necessity of Marxism is something you're drawing upon from your experiences or from your background or something, it's like, that's not reassuring to me at all, you know?

Um... know um um but yeah the the revolutionary spark is the hardest thing of all to disseminate and reproduce and communicate you know that's not that's something extremely extremely

difficult you know and um we have to be smart and cognizant about how that type of thing can even happen, you know?

Like...

Um... um

sorry

yeah so i was saying like

i've been obsessed with the question Yeah, so I was saying, like,

I've been obsessed with the question of where narcos keep coming from for years.

This landed me at communism.

You haven't gotten it yet, though.

You really have not become a communist until you can see let me let me use a term that I want to make sure there's like no other connotations to it so I don't use it accidentally

okay accidentally. Okay. At a certain point, you have to front load everything.

I don't know if that's even the correct term.

You know, you have to like, you have to, you have to leave behind everything behind you in some sense.

And you have to accept communism as an irreducible horizon in front of you.

That is without without any like justification that comes from behind from your past and once you isolate it there, you start to realize that this thing that's in front of you, that's compelling everything, right?

That is something that's real, that we do

relate to actively, whether we're aware

of it or not. That that's not just something

you're imposing on reality

from thin air.

So,

communism becomes this way to be aware or have some kind of, uh...

What's the word uh lingual i guess relation toward your your ability to name it this force that

compels the determination of all things in front of you, not behind you, right?

Which is all very mystical and strange sounding and stuff, but it does make sense when you start to apply this reasoning to how is it that people become communists?

You know, I tend to realize something about... to how is it that people become communists?

You know, I tend to realize something about... The way people become communist is that...

They always begin with what the big other or the they is talking about. For example, one of the reasons people find

Marxism compelling is the fact that Marxism is taken seriously by many other different people.

So, well, Marxism is this thing that other people are always talking about, and it's this

it's this thing, it's taken seriously.

Marxism is a discourse, it's a thing, people take it seriously.

You know, communism, it's this thing out there.

Like, as much as libertarians and American right-wingers

try to efface the patriarchs of communism and Marxism

by making mockeries of Marx, of Karl Marx,

and making mockeries of revolutionaries in the past,

it actually is not all that effective,

you know?

Because Marxism is not a...

It's a patriarchical tradition

in a historical sense, but in another sense, in a historical sense,

but in another sense,

in a modern sense,

it's not a patriarchical

tradition.

Marxism, the name

of Marxism is not associated

with the authority of any

particular voice, or any particular figure authority of any particular voice or any particular figure or any particular

guru or any particular personality. Marxism and communism cannot be tied to the vanity project

of a specific personality. It does have a universal quality

just in the strict sense of in embodying and incarnating this collective trend and discourse

that seems to transcend the logic of interpersonal relationships.

Marxism is the thing that they're taught. It's this trendy thing. It's a thing that's trendy

in universities and it's popular, communist ideas and so on and so on the guy it's not about suffering it's

about lowering yourself to the status of the masses johnny castro can't take you seriously bro i'm

sorry like you you don't get it you're not, your typing doesn't reassure me at all,

all right?

Especially the fact that you put it in all caps

doesn't reassure me at all,

frankly.

Um,

nobody was talking about suffering. Who fuck mentioned suffering by the way like

again uh you know

you guys don't get it i'm just telling you the truth

i'm trying to communicate to you but it's like like, you're like ignoring me, you know? It's like you're ignoring me. Like, I'm talking about something that is like not that easy to put into words, but like I'm really trying to like refer to something very specific, which is like, what type of information is Marxism to the average Joe? Is it, do they associate it with a specific personality, like a cult leader or some kind of like authority figure.

And I'm saying like, well, no, it's this kind of like decentralized, you know, disembodied discourse that is not reducible

to some kind of like particular interest or personality.

Like that's what I'm saying, right? And then there's a guy in the chat who's like,

it's not about suffering! And the suffering of the masses! And I'm like,

bro, you're not gonna make it if this is like

I'm like literally

can you even just let me finish

what I'm trying to say

before you just start like

screaming slogans

that reassure you

like

what you said has nothing to do with anything

I'm talking about at all

like straight up

literally straight up.

Literally straight up nothing.

Okay.

Like literally nothing, like to the point where it gives me a fucking headache thinking about how they could be related.

I don't want to talk about suffering, dude.

I really don't.

Like, suffering?

What?

Lowering yourself to the status of the masses?

What does that even mean? And also, I fucking disagree. and also I

fucking disagree with that

because for a lot of people

lowering yourself to the masses means

putting on overalls and becoming a

caricature of what you think the masses are

and then you you know,

thinking that you're relating to working people

by, like, trying to blend in with them,

which I find deeply cringe.

And I don't fuck with, okay?

So it's not what I'm trying to say at all, actually.

Anyway... so it's not what I'm trying to say at all, actually. Anyway,

back to what I'm trying to talk about.

One of the things that makes Marxism compelling to people

as difficult as it is to transmit Marxism, is, you know, the big other.

Like, when people get this idea that Marxism is already something popular, it's already something trendy, it's already something that's controversial and people are talking about it, and it's like this open source thing, it compels people and incentivizes them to have the confidence in the faith

that there's this other

that's supposed to know

you know

some smart experts out there

and it kind of humbles you like I don't have a lot of knowledge of some smart experts out there.

And it kind of humbles you.

Like, I don't have a lot of knowledge of Marxism.

Others have this knowledge of Marxism.

Marxism is taken seriously.

It's treated as credible.

And I want to learn.

And that actually assists the learning process for a lot of people because it does impose upon them the assumption or the presumption that like it is a serious thing it's worth taking seriously

it's worth humbling yourself in pursuit of understanding, right?

Baincap, Marxism equals Bernie or AOC. I'm i'm saying regular uh american associated that with marxism okay can you write a paragraph explaining how that has

anything to do with

what the fuck I'm saying

the fuck does that have to do

with what I'm talking about

what the fuck

do Bernie and aos

what do what the fuck

do Americans

who associate Marxism

with Bernie or

AOC

have

anything to

do with

what the

fuck I'm

saying?

You are

so lost

and out

there.

You're like

cutting

your

you're,

you're you're like cutting your you're putting the entire caravan in front of the fucking horse

because what I'm talking about no before anyone

gives a shit about Bernie or AOC,

this is how people become interested

in Marxism. Okay?

That's what I'm talking about.

What you're talking about is

well, everyone is Bernie and

AOC and that, like, bro,

can you just fucking like

listen to what I'm saying?

I'm trying to help you

you fucking idiot

I don't like being a cult leader

I wish y'all just got

this shit I go fucking relax. Jesus.

Like I'm straight up trying to fucking explain to y'all. Okay, today I spoke with a very average American who's the DPRK is the worst and their slaves.

I understand what you're trying to say.

Okay, well, I'm not talking about that.

I'm not talking to some of the hangups people have about Marxism.

I'm not talking about the things that make people hesitant to adopt communism or Marxist outlooks.

I'm not talking about the prejudices and anti-communist forms of consciousness people have.

What I'm talking about is what when we do see what little and you know what it's not even that little, okay?

I can fucking open TikTok and look at a TikTokic talk about you know like marxism 101 or a defense of a communist state it'll get like fucking 100,000 likes so clearly this shit there is a pipeline going on that is making people interested in Marxism.

That's already a real fucking thing.

Okay? So,

and you know what else? Like, I'm also

witnessing that with people like

academic agent.

Genius.

Like, academic agent came from a right wing background, and I'm looking at how he's, like, starting to kind of have an open mind and, like, learn from other perspectives about things like this.

So it's like

instead of focusing on the negative,

I'm trying to focus on what works right now and what's the positive

so that we could refine it

and understand it better.

Jesus fucking Christ.

Okay, the fact that there's a subconscious understanding

of the massive historical role of the tradition.

No. No, you still don't get it, dude.

No, it's the fact that Marxism

for a lot of people...

Fuck y'all, we're doing Microsoft Paint.

I guess for the retards, you know?

It's like, I wanted you guys to be smart enough that we don't have to do this,

but y'all are just retarded, and we're just going to do it like this okay literal fucking cave

paintings for fucking Neanderthals

that's the level

of fucking retardation.

You fucking brain-rotted

TikTok retards are on.

Ah.

Okay.

Now if there's anything you should know about dialectics okay

dialectics

is a tit for tat it's a back and forth

okay

that's literally what dialectics means okay it's a it's a it's a constant back and

forth okay it's you yelling at the cosmos and the cosmos yelling back okay it's you affecting

something upon reality and that thing returning in favor to you. Okay? That's just a, if you wanted, the dialect is very simple to understand. So let's talk about the dialectic of Marxism. Okay. So before we talk about this, I want to talk about a different dialectic.

So that has nothing to do with politics, okay?

Because, you know, a lot of you guys are just retarded, and I have to, like, explain shit.

That, that is super easy to understand, but, you know, you guys make it difficult because you

overthink it.

And you're too stuck in your own head of your own copium ways of justifying Marxism to yourselves, which you're so comfortable with despite that they don't work because you're clearly not like recruiting people en masse. trying to like make trying to like make I want this to be quite expressive, okay? All right.

All right.

Let's just have a fat ass here because...

Why the fuck not?

Kind of make this quite expressive, you know. So that's the something was vulgar. Um, uh, you know, somebody, some fucking guy trying to convince you of some shit, you know,

let's just say, um... All right. Let's, like, let's, like, some stupid shit like this right so this is a dialectical scenario

it took me five minutes to set up with 20 subs for the fucking trouble it's causing me um all right so this is a dialectical interaction this guy's coming up

to you some scrawny nerd he says at one time i beat up kabib okay and then you have a response

okay and then you have a response okay

you look right in the face

and you say

shut the fuck up bro

no you didn't and all

the cred is all on this guy okay

it's just his face it's him it's his personality the entire

proposition the this all this information can be dismissed as the the delusions and the ego and the

pettiness of this retard and this loser, right?

So it can be easily dismissed.

This is, you know, this guy is a fucking liar.

He's not credible.

He's just bullshitting me.

And that's the end of that, right?

Okay.

Now, let me show you another scenario, okay? Thank you. You know, Okay, so like some shit like this, gang.

So like some shit like this, gang. Okay?

So, like, some shit like this, okay?

Like, let's just say there's some shit like this, right?

You can even...

Damn, fuck. Okay, I guess that...

We can even have the, you know, the CPI logo, right?

Fucking... Okay. Okay. You know, Thank you. You know, Thank you. You know, all right so All right. So I've given you one interaction. Okay. So the first interaction was this guy, you know, bragging about how he beat up Khabib,

some like crazy shit, right?

And then this guy,

the whole thing just goes back to this guy, right?

So he's just like, this guy's not credible.

I'm going to dismiss that piece of information.

And it's just a reflection of this one person right that's it another interaction

is like a cult right and you know we could be guilty of this as well we should do self-criticism so

we're not like this. You know, some kind

of cult coming

up to someone and saying,

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And then this person

being like, okay, and then they look into

it, and it all goes back to

like this guy, right? It's just like all

this guy. So it's just like this guy right it's just like all this guy so it's

just like this guy shit okay

so it's like a specific type

of like embodied

authority here

and it's just this guy

this guru who just knows it all right

it could be this could be the lorush stuff it could

anything honestly could be any like organization that's like this you see people like sometimes

on the subway they're handing out newspapers they're handing out something else or bob avakian or

something like that and it's like

okay well this is this all traces

back to the

consciousness of like this

yeah Fallon whatever this

but always back to like this this one guy

you know

but why why is Marxism different? Why guy, you know. But why

is Marxism different?

Why does Marxism

invite...

So, what's the dialectic

here?

Okay, the dialectic is

this guy trying to spread his

shit, this guy being like

who are you

and then this guy saying

look into it and then it all going

it ends here with this personality

see in this interaction this guy's like

hey I beat up Khabi and then this guy's like okay fuck you and then it's over right

this the dialectic here is different a marxist will talk about marxism joe schmoe will express skepticism

the marxist will make an appeal maybe to the big other and that will actually lead

joe schmo to overlook this marxist and be like hey a lot of people are talking about marxism a lot of

people are taking it seriously.

There is this like thing going on.

And that opens the horizon of the dialectic of relating to Marxist consciousness in a way that clearly surpasses the horizon of like this one person who happened to tell Joe Schmo about it.

So oftentimes you'll see libertarians and you'll see right-wingers and Republicans trying to pin down Marxism to the fanciful personality or conceits of Karl Marx, and they'll try to mock Carl Marx, but Karl Marx is dead. They don't really ever have a boogeyman or a straw man to nail Marxism too.

So how do you account for its trendiness and popularity as like a big other, right?

And Marxism is one of the only comprehensive outlooks that have this ability to kind of reflect, you know, the disembodied

logos.

Disembodied collective logos.

See, one of the limitations of infrared

is, or our movement, is that, like,

we have not yet become this.

Now, this can involve

personalities. For example, the Groypers

become this because they made Nick

a meme. Because they made Nick

a meme, he has

ascended to this

status within

cultural consciousness

but

Marxism is here

it's a disembodied

collective logos

that is just

non-reducible

to any specific individual or personality. Now, if you're a materialist,

interactions are based on interactions between people. And Marxism cannot be tied to a specific person.

So this is the sense in which thinkers, like Al-N. Bedou,

tried to situate communism in the Platonic tradition. You know, communism, like Plato's forms, is absolutely above or beyond any kind of like particular private interests or patholo psychopathologies and so on and so on

and in that sense it's what's in common which i don't necessarily agree with um for say

disembodied is the right word.

How the fuck do you explain this to Normies? Hey, buddy, I'm not explaining this to Normies. I'm explaining this to you. You fucking retard.

Blunt, here's what I'm explaining to you, okay?

What I'm explaining to you is that the thing that's going to get Joe Shmo's wheels turning in his head, wanting to study Marxism and communism more, is when he finds out that it's here. This is what's going to string him along.

The fact that it's in the, the true Marxist is a big other. The real Marxist is a big other.

And that he, his consciousness, relative to this, is clearly inferior and has some catching up to do.

Because this is the accumulation of a rich dialectic of back and forth, trial and error, practice and theory, debate, you know, criticism, self-criticism, yada, yada, yada, yada.

Culminating in this, okay?

And he is going to realize, hey, I might have thought this in my head as a response to Marxism, but this already accounts for that. Clearly, I have catching up to do to understand this. So this is what makes Marxism something that's not just like the fanciful product of some kind of cult or personality. It's what makes Marxism something out there and, you know, clearly reflective of something that is in the realm of the big other.

And this is actually something you should critique Marxists about,

because oftentimes Marxists rely upon the authority of an imaginary big other.

You see it all the time on X. Marxists oftentimes... rely upon the authority of an imaginary big other.

You see it all the time on X.

Marxists oftentimes rely upon, you know, there being some kind of, well, Marxism has been confirmed by the scientists.

Oh, well, today, the top universities are confirming and accepting Marxism. They delude themselves into thinking that the hegemony, the knowledge within the hegemony is Marxist and has a Marxist bent as a way to legitimize Marxism. Like God.

No, not like God.

Okay, cool.

Not like God.

You know, cool.

You know, I could tell you're not that curious.

Because if you were smart, you would think to yourself, what are some other examples of a disembodied collective logos? Well, airplanes. When you get out an airplane, you're presuming that there's

some kind of expertise involved in the design, construction, and manufacturing of the airplane, and, you know, that allows you to say, well, they know what they're talking about. Clearly, this plane is going to be safe. They know whoever made it knows what they're doing. There's all sorts of ways in which you experience reality and society in this way. Okay.

And usually you're not getting on a plane and when someone tells you it's going to be safe,

you're not going to sit there and say, oh, this is all, you know, this all goes back to this one guy, you know, Mr. Clean or something. I don't forget. Dr. Phil. Dr. Phil is the reason that we're being told that airplanes are safe. No, it's not Dr. Phil.

There's some kind of disembodied

collective logos that

makes you trust flying on planes

and also makes you respect the authority of the state

and politicians and laws and norms and conventions and routines and so on and so on.

So this is just how reality is structured for human beings.

So it's like trust.

It's not just like trust.

You're missing the point.

I'm talking about as it concerns knowledge.

More specifically, knowledge.

Okay. Islam. Islam

Bro, just drop a 20, just drop a 20.

Just drop a 20, bro.

Like, just pack it up, drop a 20.

Just drop a 20.

Drop 20 gifted. I don I want to hear this shit

pack it up bro just drop a 20 gifted what are we even talking about here All right. All right. all right you think china you know china is a big see this is what's interesting that china is the reason

the disembodied collective logos is no longer disembodied collective logos

is no longer disembodied.

So the specter that's haunting Europe

in Marx's time, this is what it was

referring to, by the way,

is no longer a specter.

It has a body. It's China.

China is an embodied collective logos. It literally is. It's an embodied collective logos. That's what China is. As a society.

It's this embodied civilizational dialectic

of how people relate to society

and how they relate to each other

and how they relate to their history

and their future and so on and so on.

But in any case,

what about when society trusted the vaccine and the other half wasn't?

Absolutely.

Precisely, there is a conflict people are losing their ability to process or accept the reality of any disembodied collective logos they're trying to embody it first and foremost in different personalities and private interests,

which is a radical step in the direction of Marxism.

What we thought was universal and so on is actually particular.

It reflects the particular interest of a class.

So it's a crude false consciousness, the conspiracism,

but it's a step in the direction of Marxism.

But the problem is that Marxism itself is a disembodied collective logos.

And that's why we have so much trouble.

But that's also why people become interested in it.

Yeah, Caleb's tried to fedge jacko as many times.

I just, I don't care.

I don't care, bro. This is how cults cope with themselves.

A cult copes with itself by saying, I'm, the reason I'm failing is because, you know,

the CIA is preventing people from seeing how I'm the Messiah, and that's why.

Like, I just don't care.

If that's what makes you feel better about yourself, just continue thinking that.

I could give you tangible examples of how I feel like intelligence agencies have actually thwarted like we're just

minding our business without any entitlement and I could tell you how we do get thwarted and how

we do get blocked and it probably is intelligence agencies, right?

But just because you're failing and no one wants to listen to you doesn't mean you're being blocked at all.

Okay?

He says that we're evil. Yeah, don't care i just i don't fucking care all right and by the way the reason i brought him i the reason i brought that shit up in this example is because sometimes I see those tendencies and that mentality because some former CPI people are in ACP. So that's baggage that needs to be left behind if you join ACP.

You can't, CPI was ostracized and going against the synthetic left.

Well, and we're ostracized and going against the synthetic left.

Well, we're not doing it in the same way.

Okay, I'll tell you that much.

Anyway.

People yearn for the collective logos to be embodied.

But... People yearn for the collective logos to be embodied, but... And hence the proliferation of different cults and...

...things like that.

Come on, what's up?

I want everyone to focus... Come on, what's up?

I want everyone to focus on what I'm trying to communicate here, though, you know?

I want everyone to focus on, um,

the topic and shut the fuck up about nonsense. Okay.

So.

Yeah, they tried, this is what, this is what the Nazis tried to do.

They tried to embody communism is jewish absolutely exactly

exactly because once you can embody the collective logos of marxism into a jew named shekelstein or

something and i can do this because I'm Semitic.

Okay?

But once you can do that, once you can put a face on it and you can embody it in something,

then this dialectical authority disappears.

Suddenly, the dialectical process of the mind attempting to master the dialectical process by which this greater result comes to be ends, and it's simply dismissed and reduced to some like big nose Jewish guy, you know, then it's somehow, it loses its, it loses its ability to kind of contain contradictions. It suddenly just becomes a front for this vulgar individual Jewish person or something, right? So that's why the Judeo-Bosivism

thing was so effective psychologically and in combating

marxism in germany um but in any case the truth is is that marxism now do i think marxism

is a disembodied collective logos?

No, I think it has a concrete body.

The concrete body is, for example, the Communist Party.

There is a...

This is bourgeois consciousness, okay?

When that person in the chat was like, well, what about during the vaccine stuff?

Dude, I'm talking about the bourgeois consciousness.

Buzwa consciousness regards it as the realm of a big other, right?

But this is what also makes it compelling to people.

This is how Marxism sneaks in through bourgeois consciousness to turn bourgeois intelligentsia into proletarian.

People with proletarian consciousness, right?

This disembodiedness and abstraction of the logos, collective logos, that is, you know, in so many words, that's also a proxy for the commodity form.

That's also a proxy for bourgeois democracy.

It's also a proxy for bourgeois metaphysics.

Absolutely it is.

And the kind of noetic superstructure of bourgeois civilization. Absolutely it is. When Marxism can assume

the authority of that in people's minds, it makes them start taking Marxism seriously, and this is superior to a cult, right?

But it's also inferior to a proletarian consciousness, which is able to embody this kind of collective logos in something concrete, such as classes, class interests, and specific, you know, tangible organizations and parties and movements and historical

formations and so on and so on.

For example, China is an embodied collective logos

and it's not disembodied, it's embodied.

But it's also, China is also not a cult, okay?

It's a civilization. It has a dialectic.

It has debate within it. It's open-ended. It has an open-ended fate.

It has all of the qualities,

collective qualities

of the kind of disembodied bourgeois logos

that make it dynamic and not

parochial and petty.

It's not like a petty nationalist society,

but it is embodied in something particular and concrete.

Haas, this is too difficult.

I'm struggling to comprehend this.

Yeah, I bet you are.

You know.

I bet you are. all i can do is try you know you know i've been doing this for years i've tried to refine my teaching to make it more palpable further retarded but you But you know, you know what people's

problem is, is that when you're

a pit bull and you bit

a baby's head,

you got to let go first.

You just, you just, you

won't, you, you, you won't loosen your grip and the grip in question is this kind of

this type of consciousness that people have, which is just...

I am somebody who's cool, calm, and collected, but...

To be educated by me truly is to really go through an agonizing process of schizophrenia and psychosis.

And sometimes I worry and wonder if I've actually driven people to schizophrenia.

Because these are all the different ways in which, you know, your presumptions, your psychological security system attempts to resist the truth.

Your psychological security system would rather drive you crazy and schizophrenic then accept the truth

like a system

when a system is threatened

by something

external one of the ways

it resists that

is by like turning inward and just cannibalizing itself,

which at least allows it to resist, you know, this, this foreign threat from without, that it just cannot accept or come to terms with and the foreign thing in question is the alienated you know um the reality of the alienated the alienated essence of mankind,

the alienated reality that we partake in.

People do not want to accept alienation.

They don't want to accept this alien other.

So your mind has all sorts of ways of just trying to persist that fatal realization, you know?

Um... um that you know you partake in this kind of alienated consciousness which is collective

and that this alienated consciousness

exists,

really exists,

and is something real.

Like,

it's not just,

um,

the product of some twist and turn in discourse.

It's irreducible.

I don't know how to put it.

But... Well, if you need a takeaway, the takeaway is very simple.

One of the things that makes Marxism very compelling to people is that when Joe Schmo talks to a Marxist, he knows that this consciousness is coming from somewhere else. Now, Republicans can blame the university system. They can blame Obama. They can blame Karl Marx himself. They can

blame any kind of personality or private formation or interest that they want. But at the end of

the day, they're going to fail. Because Marxism is something that is shaped by history.

And as long as history exists, Marxism is going to be compelling to people and be regarded as this big other

it comes from somewhere else

now where does some people say well it's jewish it comes from jewish it comes from jewish it comes from jews but that's not going to make it less popular

or compelling or interesting to people

we should lean into the otherness of it.

Yeah, I wonder why my name is Hazaldine and not fucking Jonathan Dingleberry.

You know, I wonder why my name is...

I love all the intelligent people who are like,

oh, your name is Hazaldeen, and you're an American...

You're trying to appeal to Americans.

You should make her name Jonathan Dingleberry

and put on fucking overalls,

and LARP is a fucking country boy.

That's totally going to smuggle Marxism into America, right?

It's almost like I know what I'm fucking doing.

Anyway, to continue.

Um, Anyway, to continue. Um...

Yeah, so... I'm not done with the stream yet.

That was literally a detour I had to take to explain a point that people were just not understanding or getting.

I got to talk more about this.

Anyway, so Marxism has this quality of being associated with the other or otherness in a good way, you know, like the they, the them, it's popular, it's trendy, yada, yada, yada. There's this open-ended significance to it that allows it to not be reduced to specific cults of personality or, you know, private interests and so on and so on.

Anyway, that's one of the reasons that people find it compelling.

And that is also a dialectic.

So that's an advantage.

For sure.

And for certain.

But one of the reasons um that marxism or communism is difficult, you know, its dialectic is oftentimes cut short, is because what we're facing today, and, you know, what I'm talking about is that crisis of a lack of a revolutionary spark

is that revolutionary consciousness develops from a radical mistrust of the other.

The other is Jeffrey Epstein.

I know a lot of people, I bet you at least 75% of people here, if they're over the age of 25, were radicalized at some point in their life because they encounter Noam Chomsky.

But Noam Chomsky was literally dropped in the Epstein emails.

You know, you trusted the authority of Marxism because, oh, this respectable scholar is vouching for it.

Well, that respectable scholar was also on Epstein's emails.

So we're living in an era where the disembodied collective

logos is no longer

regarded as something as disembodied.

And, you know,

the Badu's

platonic civilization

is tearing apart at the seams.

This notion of a truth

beyond anything embodied

is just

fundamentally bourgeois

and it's being torn apart at the seams.

It's just, it's no longer possible to maintain that kind of consciousness and currency among the masses.

So we're in an era of Marxism, in America, at least, where it does need to be situated on the side of radical skepticism and mistrust and doubt with respect to the other, which is associated with the right, actually, with the right actually with the right wing so this is one of the challenges

actually you know when you think about it but in any case um you have to hate the antichrist

uh All right, if you want to be in a cult forever, just give me 20 subs.

Like, if that's what you want, just give me 20 subs.

Literally just drop 20 subs.

Like, you want to, you want to do this?

You want to just be in a cult?

You don't want to learn? Literally just drop 20 subs. Like you want to, you want to do this? You want to just be in a cult. You don't want to learn.

Literally just drop 20 subs.

Drop 20 subs and I'll just, I'll just repeat. I'll I'll just yell that you gotta hate the Antichrist Aren't people becoming interested in Marxism through China or the ZPRK?

Harold with the 10. Wow, Harold's coming through. Crazy. Harold, what's up, bro?

Appreciate you, bro. Um...

Yes, they are, but...

They are for certain.

But the problem is that this

this is not enough.

Because then

you can't grow a party just based on

wow sombra with the just based on...

Wow! Sombra with the 10! I can't believe it. You guys actually fulfilled the quota.

The problem is that when you make it about China, there's no shortcuts.

Yes, for certain.

We do need a way to get a foot in the door that people take us seriously, and it's not just like we're some cult.

So, yeah, China helps with that, for certain.

But it's ultimately not enough to sustain a long struggle and and a kind of dialectic an antagonistic dialectic struggle it's it's

absolutely not enough

because at a certain point

you're going to be resting on the

the laurels or whatever.

But Kyle said that shit

like a year ago. I can't fucking

resting on the laurels.

You're going to be resting on the laurels, basically, of China.

And all Marxism is going to be resting on the laurels basically of China and all Marxism is going to be

is just defending China and talking about how great China is. And at a certain point, people's

radical skepticism is going to kick in and they're like, so you're selling me China, then what are you selling here?

You're selling China?

China's not a perfect society at all.

And also, I think the Chinese are probably annoyed of that as well, right?

So Midnight Warrior, what's up?

So you have to discover an embodied collective logos here.

That's the task and that's the struggle, you know?

That's something that you cannot rely upon anything going on elsewhere you know you have to really derive it from here but you have to do it intelligently and you have to do it in a way that works.

That doesn't just rest upon the authority of Hazaldeen. the reason you guys like

Hazaldine so much is because you were already

Marxist when you found me

and Hazaldean is trying to teach you a different

way

of applying Marxism

in America and it's inspiring a lot of you with hope.

But our task is really

to bring Marxism to the masses.

And to bring Marxism to the masses,

you can't just bring Hasaldine to the masses.

The masses have no

positive

predisposition toward me

in the way that you do, because

they're not already Marxists.

You were Bernie bro

when he found Haas.

Your streams brought me to Marksman that actually surprises the shit out of me

I didn't know that

I assumed most people

started out as leftists.

Anyway, I know there's exceptions, but I assume most people did. I didn't know that.

Because I usually take surveys in my chat, and it's like a lot of times it'd be like 80% leftists right uh anyway anyway to

take another survey

yeah it's fucking crazy like the minute

for a long time I I was like, yeah,

and we're going to do that pipeline, whatever,

and I'm like, no, it's not going to happen.

And then I realized, actually, it did happen.

I just needed to be more patient.

Anyway,

kind of a classic thing.

It happens to me all the time.

So,

um,

so the whole dark Mali thing.

Going back to that original, like this exploring and accepting the unconscious significance of 20th century communism and Marxism, well, it does come with also a radical acceptance that something either went wrong or was not completed or was gotten wrong.

What I find very sad are Western sects, self-avowed Marxist-Leninist sects, who think that communist states had it all figured out and that the only problem is that they stopped reading the theory.

So I shit you not. You know, there are some MLs who will explain the collapse of the soviet union in terms of

well they stopped teaching marxism leninism all we have to do is read books written by lennon and marx and stallin and recite and repeat those books

and you know um that's what's going to restore the integrity of the communist movement.

And I completely reject that perspective.

It's just Talmudism.

What else is it?

No insult to Jews, but it's Talmudism in the sense that Stalin would use that word.

Maybe not in the real Jewish.

Maybe not, I'm not talking about Jewish religion, maybe, but Stalin used that word of textualism, right?

Because before... because before theory can even be sensible to us we have to have a more fundamental horizon of dare I say, belief.

There's a more fundamental revolutionary spark that pre-exists our ability to learn Marxism through theory.

And that spark is common to many...

It's something that transcends history.

And that's infrared's revisionist idea, I guess.

I don't believe that you can become a Marxist-Leninist

just by reading the selected works of Lenin or Stalin or Marx and Engels.

I absolutely don't believe that.

I think that there's this original revolutionary spark

that is absolutely responsive to the era that you live in,

which pre-exists any kind of theoretical education when it comes to Marxism.

And my view is that Marxism and Marxism Len Leninism, is the language of this revolutionary spark.

It's the logos of this revolutionary spark.

And the reason there's an integrity within the religion of Marxism, Leninism.

I want to tell you about Hazaldi

me, right?

When I

confront this revolutionary

fire, this flame

that is within us all, when I confront it within myself and I

articulate it in the language of Marxism and the language of Marxism, Leninism, it actually becomes rational.

I understand what Stalin and Lenin and Marx and Engels are extremely lucid to me because i understand the dialectical context of their words i understand not only what

they're responding to but what is the subject of that discourse the subject of that

discourse is a more original revolutionary disposition and the word

revolutionary what does it mean?

Well, it's a disposition in relation to the world, which regards it from the perspective of a kind of totality, right?

Precisely the moment within the world that it must confront itself as a whole and confront what it is, you know, that is the moment which the revolutionary position occupies.

And so that position and that moment entails inevitably entails a logic a back and forth if you will begin from the position of utopianism and begin from the position example, that there's something wrong with the world.

Something about it is at odds with our innermost existence as human beings.

And so respond to that by saying, I want to create a new world.

I want to create a world that satisfies our human existence instead of this one begin from that

premise and there's a response the response is that by attempting to fashion the world according to your whim the whims and fancies of your consciousness

you end up producing something that itself reflects the same world you're trying to

annihilate right for? For example,

Fascism. Sigma, can you just shut the fuck up, bro?

Like, you owe me $20, just for saying that.

Like, that actually pissed me off when you said that. Like...

Bray, if this was a real life lecture i straight up just rob you of twenty dollars like right now

i straight up just rob you i like i would straight up expropriate twenty dollars out of your pocket

for saying for saying that stupid as shit, okay?

Like, I'm on some shit that I think is, like,

important for people to understand.

And you're like, you're like,

you yelled the most retarded as shit.

I could...

Like, I straight up...

...feel like

more stupid than I was

before you said that.

Woo! than I was before you said that. Who is talking about fascism?

I'm talking about the baby steps, the first

y'all.

Can't I can't do this shit Do you fucking know what dialectics is?

Okay.

Okay, I'll give you an example you brain-rotted retards can grasp.

You run game on a bitch.

And she responds by saying you stank.

She says,

your shit stank she says your shit stank she calls you

chopped as fuck

so you run to the fucking barbershop

to get a fucking nice cut

and then

you run back to the

bitch

she's still

clowning on you

saying you chop

so you run

to the fucking

mall

and you try to

change your

clothes that's a

dialectic

it's a back

and forth

you stupid

motherfuckers

do you understand it now?

There's an interaction that is producing changes.

So if you have a revolutionary disposition to the world, a pre-theoretical revolutionary disposition, which, by the way, some people can discover through theory and through philosophy, Marx discovered it through philosophy. Hegel's philosophy

inspired Marx to realize and attain the revolutionary disposition. But it is pre-theoretical

and pre-philosophical, not necessarily in a chronological sense,

but in the strict sense that it is a more fundamental background of consciousness.

And that more fundamental background of consciousness, which I will call revolutionary disposition or response to the world has to articulate itself in a logos, in a language.

And in order to articulate itself in something, in a logos, it has to undergo a dialectical interaction by which it responds to itself. And it responds to the response to itself, and it responds to the response to the response

to its, and so on, and so on. And it's out of that process that Marxism was born. There's a revolutionary prehistory

prehistory of Marxism before Marxism

and it was

the revolutionary history of a more fundamental revolutionary predisposition.

Marx and Engels specifically identified its origins

in the German peasant revolts

during the Protestant Reformation

Thomas Munser and so on and so on

I think Engels

says this is where communism was born

but it doesn't have you don't have to say it was born there.

You can go much further.

Okay, very clearly.

Something is at play here before then.

So, there, so, you know, Louis Althusserer a guy i don't like he says philosophy has no history

he rejects historicism when it comes to uh the philosophy the history of philosophy he says

philosophy is this kind of thing that is just that just transcends history

and it doesn't move at the pace of history and and so on and so on. So Louis Althusser said

philosophy has no history.

I would retort that by saying my response is that in some sense,

revolutionary subjectivity has no history.

It exists only through history, right?

And it articulates itself only through the concrete reality of history, but in some sense, it has no history.

Jesus Christ was about the same thing that Lenin was.

And I believe that.

I believe that the animus behind the expansions of

Kingis Khan were shared

between the Mongols and the Bolsheviks. I do believe that. Absolutely. The Mongols

were the Bolshevik party who had to ally with the northern Chinese peasants in order to conquer China.

How do you think China was conquered?

It was disgruntled peasants, subsistence farmers, who were overly taxed,

who welcomed the nomadic conquerors to topple the dynasty that they were dissatisfied with in which

they regarded as corrupt.

This is how all nomadic revolutions ever happened.

There's never been a nomadic conquest where people on horses just came and put a sword to everyone's throat and said, we're the new bosses.

They always had to make an alliance with the farmer.

The Turks conquered the Byzantines because they made an alliance with the indebted Anatolian farmers who were feeling the pressure of debt from the Genoese and Venetian bankers across the pond. So there's something about the revolutionary history of mankind that does transcend history

itself.

And this is something that soviet orthodox marxism leninism never recognized this is something

which the cultural revolution under Mao attempted to discover at least, at the very least, the impetus behind the cultural revolution in China was a recognition that there was a loss of an original revolutionary consciousness within China and that they must restore it.

So the problems with the cultural revolution emerged from, well, how did people try to restore it?

By repeating phrases, by proving how pure you were, ideologically, by holding people to the standard of a very pure, rigid, ideological outlook.

So the response may have not been entirely correct, but the problem it was trying to respond to absolutely was correct.

And infrared is different from these ML LARPers

that exist in Western countries

because I have the humility

to say it has not yet

been discovered or named.

Now, full disclosure, the

shit that I'm saying,

where do you learn this stuff

why can't

buddy I don't know

go fucking read my book

five years from now like I don't know what to

why am I streaming to you if I'm just

where do I read this stuff

I'm talking to you about it now because I want you to think about it.

Okay.

Before I get into that, all right?

Full disclosure. all right um full disclosure what i'm saying sounds a lot like islam the logic of it is sounds like islam It just straight up does.

To the point where it's like almost indistinguishable.

Not necessarily doctrinaire Islam.

Not necessarily a specific school of Islamic thought.

But it just seems and sounds like Islam. In the specific way, it articulates itself as beyond history, because Islam articulates itself as something beyond history, right? A truth beyond history. That has been attained

by mankind because of the final

message of the prophet

and I

will say

I think the logic

is sound

um it and you know forget about think the logic is sound.

You know, forget about religion for two seconds. I think that that specific notion of truth as something that transcends history but only exists through history is correct.

And maybe that's because I was born a Muslim and raised as one.

Or maybe it's because there's something about Islam that is consequential for the history of human thinking, you know, and civilization. That should be taken seriously.

And the reason I don't identify strongly as a Muslim is because of, yeah, because I hate self-ide. I hate people who have a Muslim identity on the Internet and draw conclusions from that that I have no interest in at all.

But I can't help but point out that, you know,

that infrared Marxism, Leninism,

it does seem to have that.

And it's almost like through that,

that's how.

For those that came to this movement, because they like how dynamically it has been able to reconcile Marxism with Christianity and religion, I feel like I should do my due diligence by telling you the reason infrared has that dynamic ability to connect communism with religion is because of this. It's because of this specific insight, it's because of this

specific insight.

It's almost like, it's like Sufism.

It can be, like, connected with any religion

and any tradition, even Hinduism,

whatever.

But,

that's the source.

Just so you don't feel like you're being deceived by a fucking Islamic sorcerer.

So, yeah. Islam in form is insufficiently, I think there's legitimate criticisms of Islam,

which I grapple with... I mean, I think about it all the time.

In light of this understanding of Marxism, Leninism, especially... um i mean that i want us to be on track though to have the right questions that's all

i don't i don't necessarily want to impose an answer on everyone i just want us to have

the right questions i want there to be a curiosity

about understanding the meaning of Marxism in the 21st century, which I don't see with these dogmatic

sects, you know?

And that's really all I'll insist upon is just they're neat, we need to be oriented

toward asking the right questions.

Um, really, you know? You know, uh the biggest critique could be the final profit notion i disagree i think the biggest

critique has more to do with the way

in which Islam

came to be

concretized

in

Islam.

In other words, like,

the notion of a final message and a final transcendent, universal truth, I think is the most compelling thing.

The thing that was the beginning of the end, frankly, throughout all Islamic history was, how was that articulated in something real and on this earth, right? And for example, that's Sharia law.

Okay.

How do we ensure that Sharia law

is integral in the sense that

it's, it's, these laws

are continuously

upheld in the spirit of the original law rather than just the letter.

Well, Islam failed in a lot of ways with that.

Mainstream Islam failed.

Absolutely it failed in a lot of ways with that. You know, laws that were rational and,

you know, good, I would say, in these 800s are not necessarily all going to be good in the 1900s, right?

So, and then, for example, the universal medium of the Arabic language,

the privileging of certain aspects of Arabic culture and language. The

privileging of

certain aspects of

Arabic culture and

language.

Is this

the fundamental

and final

truth?

Was this

the necessary

at the time, you know, the necessary medium of revelation?

So there's a distinction between the necessary medium of revelation, given a certain historical time and place, versus the actual essential truth.

And that's the whole Shia-Suni split when you think about it.

The whole Shia-Suni split

boils down to the Sunnis-believed

in a continuity of the accidents of revelation, in the form of, you know, the existing Islamic community.

And the Shia believe a radical cut and contradiction between the accident of revelation and the essence of revelation, which to be fair is something that Sufis, including Sunni Sufis, also believe in,

but the bridge between some heterodox orientations within Sufism and Shia Islam are not too far.

For example, the way in which the Safaviyah Sufi Order eventually became the Kizalbash that founded the Safavid dynasty in Persia. So that is a contradiction within Islam that you see through the fact that there is a Sunni Shia split in the history of Islam proves that Islam the message of Islam was completed but the the law of Islam was completed but the

law of Islam

the community of Islam

the civilization

of Islam was not completed

which is very interesting.

The message was completed for certain, but the medium was not.

Put it, put it, if you want to understand Islam, put it this way.

The message of Islam was complete, but the medium never was completed.

And how can the message pre-exist the medium?

Well, that's why Islam is a futuristic, you know, Terminator religion.

That's why Nick Land is a crypto-Muslim.

Because this notion of a future that retroactively shapes its past is a logic that is within Islam.

Very much so. Very much so.

If Judaism is a religion that has a notion of a very strong foundation, out of which, you know, comes the modern, right?

The now.

And then Christianity has a notion of no foundation,

but not necessarily any future either,

just nowness.

Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. future either just nowness christian islam judaism christianian islam let's call them different articulations of the modern so judaism believes that the modern is shaped by the past christianity only believes the modern is real and nothing else.

But Islam shapes, believes that the modern is shaped. believes shapes

believes that the modern is shaped

by something that has already come to pass

so the question of how the modern is shaped

belongs to the future right so in Islam

but but in contrast to Judaism Islam doesn't believe this has happened in the past it kind of

it's like it happened in the future.

The message is final and complete,

but the very medium by which that message articulates itself is suspended in contradictions.

It's like Rokos Basilisk.

The AI is in the future.

And it already exists in some sense.

And the AI is assembling itself from the future through the past.

So the message is complete, but the the medium the means of the production of the

message is incomplete and that's the paradox of is Islam if you want to think about it.

And this can be blasphous. Is Marxism itself another is, how did the modern Christianity come to articulate the modern in a new way?

And that was the Protestant Reformation, the origin of modernity right christianity became

truly the religion of the modern with the protestant reformation before the protestant

reformation you could say could say Christianity may have been an addendum to Judaism, right? The Protestant Reformation made Christianity a religion of the now and the now only without a past and without a future, just the now. so much to think about everybody much to think about everybody much to think about

about any guys we're gonna wrap it up we're gonna wrap it up here i hope you found the stream

insightful and whatever there's only 300 people here though it's late You know, I am not able to be able anymore. I am not as instant as before.

I stay in the mirror in my room,

and bang, I feel it stronger in my soul.

But I'm not so ready for this wall.

Now if you think that even see before i need an explanation tell me more why i've been a no i don't know how can he leave forever i don't know where can you can't happen i don't know what Where can you care of heaven? I don't know.

What is I going to happen?

I don't know.

No, why I'm in my phone.

I don't know.

No.

I don't know.

No.

No.

No.

No.