🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

How about now? I had to reset the stream, unfortunately.

How about now?

How about now? Is it fixed?

Let me know if it's fixed.

1080P.

Hold the line, by the way.

Don't be an idiot.

You got to hold the line.

Better or totally fixed.

Okay?

Okay, we're good.

We're good then.

Wow, guys.

Anyway, I don't know if you guys have noticed i cleaned up my beard a little bit

so i don't look as um it's not that relevant we have important things to talk about

wow black pack what's going on man, wow, what a way to start the stream. Blackback. Thank you so much, brother. I appreciate you. Appreciate you a ton. So, guys, we have some things we need to talk about. First order of business is I see your guys's efforts to combat the JQ stuff on X and it's commendable, especially when it comes to the Judeo bolshevism stuff. That's really

where it's relevant for us.

But there's some problems. Thank you so much, Red Saffron. I appreciate you.

There's so, wow, Red Saffron. Wow, way to go. There's some things we need to be mindful of, and I think there's been a little

bit of an overcorrection. And I want to introduce you guys to the concept of a bad infinity,

where you do the same thing over and over and over again and the result doesn't change the approach you guys

have been doing when it comes to jq great especially i love that meme where somebody i think it was like

a gropeper somebody put a Jewish star over Nick Fuentes

and then showed it to him.

And he was like, yeah, well, you know, he might be controlled opposition.

Instantly changed his mind just with a Jewish star.

So that stuff is funny, all right?

I'm not saying that's the problem.

But I'm saying that a hyper fixation, we don't want to, we don't want to, like, be JQers about the JQ.

The whole point of this, thank you so much, Terry.

I appreciate you so much. Wow wow what a way to start off

i want you guys to be mindful of something and it's basic psychology the more attention you give this

the more you fight back against it the more you just just, this is not the hill we're here to

die on. All right, we are confident in our position. We are confident in the superiority,

the analytical superiority of Marxism. And when we excessively try to overcorrect,

well, what's going on?

Appreciate you so much.

When we try to excessively overcorrect when it comes to JQ stuff, it's not good optics.

It's not good optics.

It's not a good strategy. And it doesn't work. That's the most important thing. It doesn't work. And I'm going to explain exactly how we make it work. Because guys,

conspiracy theories about Jewish people is not the primary contradiction. Midwest

Singh! I appreciate you so much, man.

I want you guys to understand

something. Antisemitism

is not the primary contradiction.

We consider it a weakness.

We consider it a defect.

But it's not the primary contradiction. Sleeper cell, wow, what's going on?

What I mean to say by this is that us counter JQwing all the time

especially as aggressively as the community has been

doing

puts us on the back foot, puts us on the defense.

And it's not where we want to be.

Where we want to be right now.

W-11. Wow! Holy shit, what a way to start. We don't want to focus on it because it puts us on the back foot. It makes us seem like we're in the defensive and we're like pushing back against this rising tide and we're on the

defensive that's not where we want to be we are the nomadic mongols of the internet okay what that

means is we want to constantly, Dark Peterson.

Thank you so much.

Appreciate you a lot.

What I mean to say by that is that we want to constantly be on the offensive.

So the point, our biggest concern is not anti-semitism that's not our biggest

concern we consider it

a weakness we warn against

it because we consider it a mental defect

we consider it limiting in our ability to

actually understand the world properly.

But when all is said and done, the point isn't to just eliminate anti-Semitism.

The point is to more fundamentally offer a positive vision, a positive analysis of the world

and to do that in practice.

To do it in...

We don't want to get fixated

in our points of

disagreement with right wingers

and die on that hill. We want to focus.

Alte, wow, with the 10, appreciate you so much. What we want to do is focus on what sets us

apart in the positive sense. Prove indeed why our position is superior

in terms of the analysis it's able to yield. In terms of the positions it's able to yield,

the most cutting-edge analysis, the most cutting-edge analysis, the most cutting-edge

theory, the most cutting-edge consciousness, the most cutting-edge art, that's how we prove

the superiority of our position over the right. But as long as we constantly obsess and fix,

we don't want to die in this hole thinking we're dying on a hill

but we're really spiraling into a hole actually and there's no way to get out us having to be

on the defensive on this issue is allowing them to win and put us in a position of weakness.

And by the way, the reason it's bad optics is because, of course, we oppose anti-Semitism.

I don't even need to say that, okay?

But right now, Jewish people are not oppressed. Jewish people are not

persecuted right now. They're not, you know, there's no need for to call for a movement to

liberate Jewish people from that-Sem it's ridiculous okay

and I'm not saying Jewish people are bad and I'm not saying they're all ruling class I'm just

saying anti-Semitism is not like it was a hundred years ago okay it's there's i don't really see pogroms and stuff happening

anymore on the contrary you have an extremely aggressive extremely powerful yes powerful permeating

huge degrees of the power structure in America and in the West of the Zionist ideology and the Zionism that's aligned with the hegemony. That's part of the hegemony, right? We don't like seeing people get canceled for expressing their opinions what

Candice Owen said about Bolsheviks was uninformed it was ignorant but we don't

support Candice Owens getting fired for expressing her opinion differently, especially when it's relevant to the Gaza conflict.

So I really want people to understand the optical significance of the various hills we choose to die on.

Fighting Zionism is much more important right now.

There is a secondary contradiction where we want to dispel errors.

We want to dispel mistakes people are making when it comes to the JQ stuff.

But setting ourselves up in this way where we're on the defensive rather than the offensive is a disastrous blunder and a disastrous mistake.

And I want the community to understand that.

I want the community to understand that we need to be on the offensive.

And we're on the offensive when we are at the vanguard of fighting Zionist hegemony.

Now, what is Zionist degemony?

Does that mean the hegemony is just Zionist?

No.

But Zionism is part of the hegemony.

So the hegemony is qualitatively Zionist.

Absolutely.

It's important to fight the Zionist hegemony.

It's important to fight the ideology of Zionism in concrete terms, not just for humanitarian reasons, because there's a genocide going on in Gaza.

Thank you so much, Paperwin. I appreciate you so much.

Not only because there's a genocide going on in Gaza, this is the really important thing but also because

well i don't want to get too philosophical because i know i use a lot of words and people

are intimidated by these words but i'll paper paperwin. Wow, I'm seeing that now. Thank you so much, brother.

Zionism is one of the most rabid and aggressive manifestations of what we call bourgeois civilization from the 19th century.

It's one of the last remnants of the last remnants of the fundamentalism of the artifice of the nation-state institution,

which stands in the way of civilization states and regional integration, and therefore,

multipolarity.

So Zionism is reactionary, not just in the sense of Israel.

It's also reactionary in the sense of the international networks connected and headquartered

in Wall Street, the city of London, and Tel Aviv, for that matter.

These networks are not exclusively Jewish. No one's saying that.

But Zionism is a very important part of the global hegemony.

So the anti-Zionist struggle is very important.

It's an existential struggle. It's a struggle about the meaning of what a community is. Is a community just something you create artificially,

completely from scratch, and artificially create a sense of nationhood based on this bourgeois ideology, or is there a fundamental deeper texture of civilization that needs to be recognized, which Zionism seeks to suppress, seeks to exterminate, and so on and so forth.

The Zionist ideology also must be opposed on account of the specific vector, it represents in terms of the development of Western liberal hegemony after World War II.

In the Second World War, you had the Soviet Union, and then on the other hand, you had the Soviet Union and then on the other hand you had the

Atlantisist forces Great Britain and the United States

Zionism was very important

in narrativizing and responding to the events of World War II in such a way that reinforced the hegemony of the Atlantisist forces.

It was a specific articulation of the events of the persecution of Jews because of Hitler's Germany and Nazism, according to which, and this was used during

the Cold War, all kinds of populism.

And by the way, in the 30s, they didn't call it populism.

They just called it democracy.

The root words are the same.

Populism, what is this?

I think I believe it's Latin, right?

The root word comes from the people, right?

Democracy, the root word is Greek, Demos, so it's literally just the same thing.

It's just different Greek or Latin, pick your poison, basically.

But

after the Cold War,

proletarian populism,

in general,

and Stalinism and communism, took the blame for the atrocities of the Nazis.

And the Zionist ideology was basically constructed around this idea that if you have a proletarian populism,

all these national liberation movements going on in the world, you know, the mobilization of masses, the cultural revolution in China, we're going to talk about that in a second, by the way.

Millions and millions of ordinary, illiterate, yes, uneducated, yes, peasants being mobilized to form real political power. That was, according to the Zionist ideology, running cover for

the liberal hegemony, this same thing is fascism.

The vulgar populism that's targeting the Jewish minority or the minority of educated

specialists, glasses wearers, right?

Now, to actually concede this point to the Zionists would be wrong, because we know that in Eastern Europe, there were not all Jews were professionals or educated people, urbanized, educated people. A lot of them were proletarians working in factories.

A lot of them were small artisans, you know, small business owners.

So it wouldn't be fair to concede to them that point as being true.

But I'm just trying to explain to you that Zionism has been a powerful ideological tool of the liberal hegemony for purposes of anti-communism, to fight communism.

Because more or less, communism was blamed for the atrocities of Hitler in the

form of blaming mass politics

in general for the crimes

of fascism

and the basic idea

became that

outside of liberal democracy it's just Hitler so you have liberal

democracy and then you have authoritarianism which according to the mind of the bourgeoisie is just

Hitler so that's what we were

dealing with in the post-war period.

All forms of

illiberal societies

were dismissed as

fascist and Hitlerite

because, you know, Hitler was

regarded by the bourgeoisie as a kind of strong man you know

Stalin is a strong man Fidel Castro is a strong man Hugo Chavez is a strong man so those were all

basically thrown into the basket so to speak of fascism with the aid of Zionist ideology, which is even going farther to reinforce this point by saying, and, you know, the danger of a new Holocaust is going to happen too, because these people are vulgargar populace just like Hitler wasn't that,

by the way. He was a ruling class puppet. But I'm just telling you from the mind of the ruling

class, that's what it is. So all I'm trying to say is understand what our priorities need to be right now.

We will fight against the right. We will fight all forms of anti-communism, including falsehoods about the heroic Bolsheviks, but we need to do it most of all in a positive way, not just in a reactive, negative and defensive way, but in a positive way. We need to assert communism as a positive alternative, aesthetically, ideologically, as a tool of analysis, as a type of consciousness.

And that's the hard part.

It's easy to just respond to the dumb things right-wingers are saying.

And by the way way we should respond

when it concerns communism any traces of anti-communism whether it's this new string of posts

i'm seeing from illiterates about the cultural revolution because they watched a new show on Netflix.

I'm actually going to talk about that in a second.

Or it's the nonsense about the Bolsheviks being Jews or whatever.

We should respond to those things and bring up the threads we did debunking

and we should defend the legacy of Mao and the

cultural revolution. But we also need to be on the offensive. And right now I see guerrillas lacking

on that front. It's hard to be on the offensive. When you're on the offensive,

you actually have to do work.

You have to do a kind of computational work where you don't know what the output is going to be,

but you have to kind of search for an output.

You have to search for a message that works positively.

You don't have it ready at hand.

Communism, good, Stalin, good, Mao, good.

That's all something we have at hand.

But how do we actually make communism a persuasive, positive message? You need to actually...

You need to actually have a deeper sense of people's intuitions and their consciousness. You need to do meme magic. You have to like understand the vibe that it makes sense.

That's not an easy thing to do, but it's what we need to be doing right now.

So I'd like to strongly emphasize that point. I don't like the direction the community to a certain extent is going in on the info or on X of just constantly obsessing over the responding to the JQ people. Those people are not going to be convinced with facts and reason.

And if you don't believe me, again, all it took for them to be convinced is like you just put a Jewish star on a photo and they, that's it.

So clearly there's something going on subconsciously and unconsciously. And we need to be Lacanian and and break that down and understand it in order to counteract it and bypass it.

And it's not going to be done directly by just talking about facts and things of that nature.

So that's an extremely important point I'd like to make, you know.

Another thing I'd like to talk about a little bit is the Netflix adaptation of the three-body problem.

I watched the first episode last night and then I just kind of skipped through it after that.

I mean it when I say this.

And I mean this with complete sincerity.

I mean this with complete sincerity. It was a zero out of ten. There are no redeeming qualities. It was so bad. I actually kind of felt a little bit sick in my stomach and wanted to vomit because of how bad it was.

I don't even know where to start talking about how bad Netflix's adaptation of it is.

If you have any interest in watching the three body problem in any capacity,

just watch the Tencent version. And I'm not just saying this because I'm a China shill or whatever.

I'm saying that from the bottom of my heart. The Netflix adaptation. Hamza, what's going on, man? Thank you so much. Now, I'm going to,

I'm going to briefly kind of talk about why the Netflix adaptation is so bad. And the first one,

I'll lay my cards on the table, the ideological bias I have.

Their depiction of the Cultural Revolution has excited some very smart and bright, high IQ intellectuals from the right wing who are like, oh my God, this is so horrific.

This is what the left wants to do in America.

And it's like,

I was actually going to say something really fucked up as a joke,

but I know my community won't take it as a joke.

So I'm not going to say it.

It's just the writers the writers chose a bad time who are the david and whatever from game of thrones i have some

things to say about them but i'm not going to say it because no one will be able to take the joke but you know i

kind of want to say it i'm not going to anyway um the depiction of the cultural revolution

and just in general china in thes, was your typical kind of like Cold War style Orwellian demonization of totalitarianism, which I thought was very cheap, I thought was overly ideological, and I thought was unrealistic.

That's the most important thing. It just wasn't convincing that this is actually a thing that was happening or could happen.

Now, if you watch the 10-cent version, you know, they do depict the harsh relatively harsh conditions in

which the youth had to work and you know chopping down trees and the sent down youth movement

and they kind of they did show that she got caught with the book, and she got in trouble for it. But in the

10 cent version, it's just more realistic. It's actually like more in tune with how that would

have actually played out. Instead of like this Orwellian giant dystopian state, it's more like, there's just this general communal atmosphere of ideological rigidity.

It's not like, oh, the state is all powerful. It's not like that. It's more like it's just a kind of

it's a communal

and cultural thing going on

and it makes sense in the context

and at the time. However bad

and not cool

it is that she's being interrogated for having

a book. When you watch the tenn cent

version it's actually convincing like to put it into context how that could have happened or

why that would have played out the way it did and it's an accurate depiction of china more or less

i think during that time in general it's pretty an accurate depiction of

China's history and I know this because the cultural revolution is not idealized in China

okay people don't regard it as a very great time you you know, officially speaking. So they don't have a problem

depicting some of the errors or mistakes that were made during that. But the kind of wholesale,

you know, horror show, demon or Wellian totalitarianism that the three-body problem was depicting, I just found it very childish, very cartoonish, and just frankly ridiculous.

Now, if that was the only problem i could probably look past it i'm going to be honest i am an ideological person i have ideological biases but i'm not an unreasonable

person i understand we live in america i understand this is but I'm not an unreasonable person.

I understand we live in America.

I understand this is the kind of stupid ideas that people have in their head about communism.

I could otherwise overlook it.

But the thing I can't forgive in the show, most of all, is just one of the things I really liked about the Tencent version of the Three Body Problem is how hardcore science fiction it was.

Emphasis on the science part.

You know, it's like going in depth into like mathematical formulas and all these kinds of, you know,

electromagnetism and like how radios work and like all these

crazy convoluted scientific gadgets and real life like equipment that's used to

measure.

And I, you know, a good example of this is that the famous scene where the main scientist is told to kind of go and look at the sky flicker, the way he does it is he gets a really expensive piece of equipment that's held by an

observatory which kind of just when you when you put up put on the equipment it kind of just shows

you frequencies very very abstract science right and that's how he saw the flickering.

So it was like, extremely abstract, complicated, convoluted science and engineering in order to like depict the science fiction, the fictional aspect of like, actually this is like an extraterrestrial presence.

So the presence, the extraterrestrial presence is never direct.

It's always indirect.

And the horror aspect I thought was so cool was how you actually have to know

a lot about

you know basics of like modern science

to understand why things are going wrong

on the everyday level

just walking around like there's nothing

extraordinary happening when you're when you

understand the regularity with which scientists record astronomical events and you know frequencies

and i don't know radiation and all this kind of stuff. At that level, that's where things are going wrong

and things are getting really weird.

So it's really, it's like Timothy Morton's idea of a hyper object, right?

Which is extremely cool and interesting.

And it's very

slow burn in the Tencent one. They really

take their time to develop. It was

great. When Wenji

is in the observatory, by the way,

that's another thing I wanted to talk about.

Like, the Wenji's time in the observatory, that's another thing I wanted to talk about. Like, the

Wenji's time in the observatory,

it's also extremely realistic.

It seems like. It's like, it's very...

The set pieces are just great.

They're great.

They're so interesting looking how historical they are

depicting 60s in China where even

in this radio observatory, everyone's wearing

the Red Guard outfits and there's red stars

and it's like

it's

her various struggles to get promoted

to get informed about what's actually going on at Red Coast Base. It's her various struggles to get promoted, to get informed about what's actually going on at Red Coast Base.

It's like, it seems like it's like thematic.

It's good writing.

It's good storytelling.

Whereas in the show, I don't want to get everywhere at once

but just just bear with me

back to that flickering sky thing right

put that on hold for a second

where like he has to put on the

expensive piece of goggles or whatever

to like see the radio frequencies acting in an irregular manner

which for a scientist is going to freak them out for the average person it's like who cares right

if you're a scientist though that's what you're you're realizing something's wrong.

An example of how unsophisticated and vulgar and cheap the Netflix adaptation is, the scientist,

and I'll get to that in a second, the equivalent main character just goes outside in the middle of like

in the middle of like a

college campus just like walks outside

with no equipment

and just looks at the sky with the naked eye

and

the stars just flicker like yeah like like like a supernatural event basically

and i just kind of that just really is the that's not the only way in which that translation is like

totally botched and vulgarized and made it look stupid.

But like that's just like the epitome of what the Netflix adaptation is compared to the 10-cent show.

Okay.

Now there's another thing I want to talk about and I'm going to kind of go into the quartering territory here, actually.

I did not like that they replaced the main character with a woman and a pretty woman at that.

Now, in the Tencent version, the main character is a guy who looks like your average scientist.

wears glasses, not particularly handsome, not particularly charismatic,

but he's such a compelling and good character precisely because he does the job of like being a scientist who's like losing his mind and like trying to figure out what the hell is going on in the way that you would expect like you know an egghead scientist too in the show they like

some like supermodel woman they replaced him with some like extremely pretty woman i don't know why they

did that i don't even think it should be a woman in the first place because I think there's something very male about that character, like the anxiety he has, the logo-centric anxiety that he has of like, you know, physics breaking down and nothing is making sense, that level of paranoia and all that kind of stuff. I think there's something very male about that, that a woman, you just can't replicate it in that. But even if you were going to, why would you choose like an extremely attractive pretty woman to do it?

It just looks really stupid and it felt like it was an insult to our intelligence.

So that's another thing I wanted to complain about.

Finally, the show went through the path of eight episodes, about an hour each, and the whole

book was covered, and like half of the second book, which I'm not necessarily against in principle.

I understand we don't all have a lot of time.

The 10-cent version, admittedly, was very long, though I appreciated it.

I wouldn't have mind

that path

if they would have made it much more spectacular

at the level of sci-fi.

If you want dumbed-down

sci-fi and you don't want to do the slow-burn

sophisticated science fiction

of the Tencent show, then give us spectacular sci-fi.

Show us these aliens.

Show us their alien world.

If you're going to deviate from the books so much, which again, in principle I'm not even

necessarily against, but make it a spectacular blockbuster piece of sci-fi.

And I think you could do that.

I think the world of Tricilaris and the world of the three-body problem is extremely interesting.

The idea of the dark forest is an extremely interesting. The idea of the dark forest is an extremely interesting sci-fi concept. If you want to Americanize that or make it Hollywood style and just kind of vulgarize it, make a spectacular sci-fi series based in that world

in that setting

like by all means

you know it's you have some

bare and bones elements

to work with that I think would work

you have

what is it called the society

of I don't even know what it's called the society of

I don't even know what it's called

the triselaris

society this science

whatever it's called

this cult that forms on earth

of people who want to aid the aliens

like you have a lot of elements to make it work, right?

But what I find insufferable about these Game of Thrones writers is that they didn't make it spectacular sci-fi because 90% of it is just some fat guy

and some

like

nine out of

10

female

just like

talking by a

campfire

or like

eating dinner

together

talking about nothing it was really infuriating it's just they're

like farting around pretty much the whole time even the even when they're they're showing the

game the VR game it's just, was so much less compelling and even visually less impressive than the

Tencent version. I'm not just saying this as a China shill who's biased toward China. Like, do not watch

the Netflix version. Okay. It's, it's not good.

There's no reason to, it has no redeeming qualities.

Unless you're like some kumer, or what do they call it now, gooner?

You're going to be gooning or something, and you want to see some pretty lady i guess that's the only

upside of it i i still wouldn't recommend it because it's not worth all that to be honest but

i don't really see any redeeming qualities to the Netflix version. I just don't.

Regarding the Game of Thrones writers, I really, really think, and I'm not joking when I say this, I really think they belong in a gulag.

And I mean it.

You think I'm joking right now, but I'm not.

If I had any kind of power,

I would throw them in a jail cell,

possibly for life or deport them. They are so hideous and disgusting with their writing. Game of Thrones was a bad show, by the way. Wasn't good.

But even if we put that aside,

these pretentious idiots,

I could just see them telling themselves,

like, oh, you really decided to, like,

going for, like, actually, like,

having it be only eight hours and you know like

the every decision every exercise of discretion every discretion they exercised every decision

they made for that show is just so wrong and bad that i actually think they

deserve to go to jail for it and i i sincerely and seriously stand by that so final verdict is a

zero out of ten a zero out of ten, absolute zero out of ten, and I want to spit in the face of the writers.

Absolutely disgusting. It's not even just like bad. It's actually disgusting. So, that

aside, all right? I wanted to get that out of the way.

I think

the cultural revolution

discourse to briefly talk about that,

and we're going to get to the Russia stuff, so don't worry.

But I find it interesting

that all these like conservatives

are like,

oh, this is what woke people

are trying to do in America

when they're like,

again, I'm not here

to just like flaunt

how much more educated

than I am than them.

But it's just funny

when you compare the context. The cultural revolution was more or less a spontaneous grassroots event that sought to challenge the hegemonic institutions in china the institutions of education the institutions of education, the institutions of the party.

It was a revolt against, in many ways, the leadership of the Communist Party, at least at the lower level.

So the culture revolution in China has a lot more in common with what Maga is doing to America's institutions now, challenging Dr. Fauci and whatnot. The idea that it's like somehow an equivalent to the woke stuff is just an institutional top-down thing it's not a grassroots thing so

i just the comparison is really stupid but it reminded me and i want someone to actually correct me if i'm

wrong there is a scene in the three body problem netflix adaptation that I found really stupid, and I want someone to fact check me if this is actually in the book or the Tencent version because I forgot.

But when Wenji and her friend are like, hey, we want to send a beam to the sun.

Cantreezy, thank you so much.

They were like, we want to send a beam to the sun,

a radio frequency signal, something like that,

so it can be amplified.

And then the radio guy is like, no!

Because do you understand the political symbolism?

Because Mao is the red sun.

And it's like shooting Mao.

And that's why they weren't allowed to do it.

Now, I don't remember that being in the Tencent cent version i don't know if that was in the books i found that extremely

ridiculous and stupid does anyone remember if that's in the book okay well it's really stupid i'm

sorry to say he He said it as an offhanded

comment and did not mention Mao. Yeah, I don't, I don't know. It's like really, I don't know if that was in the

10 cent. I don't remember that in the 10 cent version if it was there, which just even if it was,

which just goes to show like the execution of that dialogue in the Netflix series was so

ridiculously stupid and embarrassing watching it that someone wrote this down and thought

it was like good.

That's another thing I wanted to get off

my chest of how like really stupid.

Really stupid it was

in the Netflix version.

We're done with the three body problem.

We're also done talking about the cultural revolution.

And we're going to talk about what happened in Russia.

Now, I don't know if you saw, but I make an appearance on r t to briefly give my preliminary thoughts

as more information is coming out it seems clear that we know the following facts fact number one

they were from tajikistan apparently and they were from Tajikistan, apparently, and they were from Muslim backgrounds.

Fact number two, they were hired on the internet, I think paid the equivalent of $5,000, which is incredible, to carry out these attacks.

Fact number three, this is where it gets a little interesting, I guess.

The U.S. knew about this. The U.S. Embassy knew about it.

I want to address a lot of the stupid arguments I've been getting for pointing this fact

out. So if you don't know this, on March 7th, the U.S. Embassy basically said that within 48 hours,

keep that in mind. Within 48 hours, we have reports of a possible attack on some kind of

crowded venue, theaters or whatever. On the dot, they were talking about it, right? The responses I got for pointing that out were really crazy, which just kind of proves to me that they weren't authentic or genuine responses, but probably fed astroturfed.

So one of the responses I got was, no, no, no, that was just a warning issued in response to the FSB foiling an attack on a synagogue, which happened the same day. No, it's not, because why did they say within 48 hours in a crowded venue? They didn't say avoid synagogues. They gave, so it was too specific. So first of all, that's not true. Secondly, why simultaneously do you also say? Well, that, oh, no, they only said that because the U.S. has the most advanced intelligence in the world. Of course, that's how they knew, right? It's U.S. intelligence. It's the best in the world. Well, which one is it? Is it U.S. intelligence picking this up? Or were they just reacting to something that happened the same day in Russia

which one is it okay so

you know get out of here

with that nonsense you're just contradicting yourself

twisting yourself into a pretzel

and I think the reason it's significant

to point out the foreknowledge

is because if you read the warning by the embassy

it kind of reads like a threat like it wasn't specific enough to the point i mean were they

feeding information to the fsb to foil the attacks we don't know we don't know i mean i've heard a theory

that the fsb between then and what happened was attacking various isis strongholds and doing a lot of work, but we're blindsided by how just

random people were, we're hired to do it, just like nobody's, right, that they couldn't have

scoped out beforehand. I don't know.

Also, I find it suss, the ISIS thing.

It's just there's a lot of...

There's a lack of clarity as to whether ISIS even did this.

Or...

This is going to blow

your mind whether ISIS

even exists anymore

does it I don't know

think about it what is ISIS

thank you so much

slump man wound if

they're saying well ISIS

took responsibility for it well

so you're saying like on some telegram

channel some guys

took responsibility for it well

is there proof that they were connected to it or that they

did it?

We have none.

There's also the mysterious

fact that, yes, this is

another thing I got community noted on.

And by the way, we shot that

shit down, so pat yourselves on the back.

That's a good job that you did that.

They made their way...

Sorry for swearing.

I'm excuse my French.

The terrorists were trying to make their way to the Ukrainian border before having gotten apprehended.

Now, CNN is trying to claim that it was the Belarusian border because it was also close to Belarus.

But if you look at the escape route, it's a direct line from Moscow to the border with Ukraine.

Not to Belarus.

It's a direct line. Belarus is another line. Okay. So, yeah, it was near the

Belarusian border, but closer to the Ukrainian border. Okay. And the route they were on was headed

towards Ukraine. So they were trying to make a go

for Ukraine.

Now,

if that were not enough to convince me of some kind

of Ukrainian involvement,

the final nail in the coffin

to me is Russia's response that it's gearing up for right now.

Russia is preparing for an unprecedented bombing campaign in Ukraine in revenge for the attacks.

So, if that doesn't prove that according to the Russian authorities, they have reason to believe Ukraine was involved, I don't know what does.

I've also heard people ask the question, Grandma Americana, what's going on? I've also heard people ask the question,

Grandma Americana, what's going on?

I've heard people basically ask the question more or less like,

well, why would the U.S. and Ukraine do this?

And if they did do this, why would the U.S. issue a warning about it? Right? Well, it's called, first of all, it's called plausible deniability. If the U.S. wants to carry a terrorist attack, they could just be like, yeah, well, we picked up some information that this may be happening. Whoopsies but if it does it has nothing to do with us so that's the kind of vibe it's being interpreted as you know we're not saying that

the u.s is directly announcing that they're going to do it it's more like oh well if this happens

who see we don't know who did it, but they do.

The other thing is that I think it's a false assumption that it's necessarily true that this was done on the orders of the authority of the so-called Kiev regime, Ukrainian government, or the United States.

We know that in the Ukrainian military, the neo-Nazis are in control, not Zelensky.

Zelensky's a patsy. He doesn't control anything. Zolensky tried to go to Donbass

before the SMO to get these people under control and he couldn't. So it is, it is easily possible that these are extremist elements fighting on behalf of Ukraine that did this.

And that the U.S. may have known about it. Ukraine may have known about, they can't control these people.

So they just let them do it.

Can't stop them.

What are you going to do?

Right?

And people are like, well, what's the motive?

Well, the motive is, one, these are insane extremists.

Two, they're getting desperate.

Russia's recent victories.

You need to understand the context.

I was in Moscow

a week or two weeks before this happened, right?

Month before this happened, something like that.

Okay, the atmosphere in Moscow is very chill.

It doesn't seem like Russia's at war.

Moscow is like totally normal.

It's just like people are going on with their lives.

You couldn't even tell Russia was at war. It's just like people are going on with their lives. You couldn't even tell Russia was at war.

It's just totally normal.

Like there's nothing, life is going on as usual.

It's very like chill, okay?

And as a final act of desperation

or one of the final acts of desperation

because they're losing so much

the idea is like okay

well we're just going to engage in

thank you so much black pack

two days after the first

State Department warning, Russia arrested

some ISIS guys on their territory.

Sounds like a misdirection from

the deep state to me. Could be. Could be

misdirection. Thank you so much, Slup.

Appreciate you a lot.

But I swap appreciate you a lot um but i i think people need to appreciate that uh sorry i think people need to appreciate that um let me fix this people need to appreciate that when you're desperate

you know you're gonna you're gonna go through your head you to say, you know, maybe what I should be doing right now is causing terrorism and chaos and panic and fear in Moscow and Rust really hit them, right? It's the last thing you can really do. Terrorism, like more or less, just cause

panic and fear on a wide scale. Maybe, maybe in hopes of spreading some kind of demoralization

and dissatisfaction with the military operation.

And plus just plain revenge out of anti-Russian hatred.

People need to understand what motivates the Ukrainian extremists is not,

oh, we just want to, we're like the blue guys from Avatar. No, what motivates them is a

genocidal exterminationist hatred of Russians. And yes, revenge is a good enough motivation for

these people. The precedent also is there for terrorism in the Donbass on multiple occasions, okay?

They've done it in the Donbass for 10 years.

They've done it on Russian soil with the murder of Darya and the murder of the blogger in St. Petersburg, Tatarsky.

So the precedent is there. These guys are psychopaths, and yeah, they are like that. You know,

if you're asking what motivation would Ukraineraine have to do this ask what motivation

isis would have to do it these are not rational people okay the assumption that the rational

i think is a big mistake travali thank you so much i accidentally stumbled across footage coming

directly from the i s media affiliate of themselves doing the massacre,

but that still doesn't rule out Ukrainian involvement. IS is a lump and gang.

Yeah, that's another thing. Like, what is IIS? I don't think it's a really centralized organization at this point.

And I think they mysteriously tend to show up, you know, causing wrecking havoc and committing atrocities against the foreign adversaries of the United States.

So, you know, what is ISIS?

Isis just seems like it's a name.

It's a cover.

You know, it doesn't really seem like this is a real organization that has independent goals, that operates independently.

That may have been true in Iraq and Syria.

Once ISIL was pretty much totally defeated,

all these other versions of ISIS,

that kind of just seems to me like

a cover for plausible deniability of U.S. State Department sanctioned terrorism.

Thank you so much, MIG. I appreciate you a lot.

So that's more or less what we have going on in Russia.

And we're going to continue to receive updates.

And remember, we shouldn't jump too forward in our assumptions because ultimately it's

the Russian government, the Russian authorities are investigating and may have already

found a deeper culprits behind this attack. authorities are investigating and may have already found

the deeper culprits behind

this attack.

But we need to basically

make sure...

Thank you so much, Australia, Stanley.

I appreciate you so much. What we need

to do is basically make sure that we raise awareness of the various red flags and not in a good way surrounding the events.

And I really did get death threats in my DMs from weird anonymous accounts saying here's a few of them I got

don't think it wouldn't be easy for you this weekend this weekend something like that for us to find, this weekend. Something like that.

For us to find you this weekend.

You know, I get other death threats from a huge Ukraine account who's like, you'll be seeing our intelligence services very soon.

What's that guy's name?

Spaghetti Faggot?

Sorry for swearing. Holy shit.

I swore again. Excuse my French.

My bad. My bad. I'm trying not to swear.

You slurs.

What's that guy's name? The Naifo guy. Spaghetti something.

Well, he tried to threaten me.

Good luck.

If I ever saw that guy in person, I would just slap him in the face so hard he would lose a tooth.

And I will do that if I ever see him.

And, you know, that's a joke, if that gets me in trouble to say.

But interpret that how you will.

Anyway, yeah, I've gotten to a point where not only me, but I think we should all block NAFO.

I block every NAFO pro-Ukrainian account I see.

If you have a Ukraine flag, I block you.

I don't care. Like, I block you. I block

all of them. And then they say,

oh, well, you're a coward, Haas. Why do you block

us? And, you know, I don't want to talk smack

over the internet. But that's

exactly the problem. Thank you so much to show

Estani. I don't like talking smack over the internet.

I block, 99% of the people that I block, I block them because

what needs to happen to you can't be done over the internet.

Thank you so much, Yeat.

For the, for the, Yeat. For the,

for the, for the trash talking you're doing

and all this big talk you're doing,

it's like,

at this point,

I'm kind of done seeing you

on the internet.

Bring that energy to me to my face.

And yeah,

I'm going to be an internet tough guy and say that.

But it's like at a certain point, I just like, I don't distrash talking of these guys on the internet behind their keyboard.

I'm not, I'm not, I'm not getting entertained it, all right?

Because I know for a fact, if I see any of these disabled NAFO people in person,

they're going to be quivering and very nervous.

And if they're not quivering and if they're not nervous and they're feeling, you know, bold,

I don't know what to tell you.

You know,

they're going to put me in a self-defense

situation where their teeth

are going to be on a curb, and

my foot is going to be

stomping somewhere.

Anyway,

don't know what to say. okay? I don't need to entertain it. I don't need

entertain trash talking on the internet anymore. In the beginning, it was entertaining. In the

beginning, it was fun, especially when it was in VC. At this point, I just block.

I'll just block you.

You know, I don't need to hear it.

You know, it's like, what are you going to do?

Nothing.

You know, keep that energy.

You can't keep that energy offline.

You're getting

blocked. That's how it is. And by the way, I'm a very public person. I don't hide who I am.

I don't, I don't hide in the shadows. I'm very public. Catch me around. I walk around. I'm around,

especially in the summer, but even in the winter. I'm here. I'm out and about.

Thank you so much brutal Stalinists. You know, I've been out and about, straight up. And I'm telling you that because not a single person, not a single person, has ever come at me with any negative energy at all, not a single person.

Even when I met those destiny orbitors at TwitchCon, they were, when they first saw me,

they were trying to be friends with me. I'm the one who, uh, kept that same energy.

But I'm not different, all right?

That's all I'm trying to say.

I'm not trying toot my own horn.

I'm just trying to say, I don't hide.

I'm not hiding from anyone.

I'm out on about, you know, keep that energy.

You know, because if you say the things you've been saying online

you're going to get slapped in the face you're going to get smacked up you're going to get smacked up

all right anyway uh i don't need a trash talk. I need to say any of this.

I'm above that.

I'm wearing a suit.

I'm very professional.

It's okay.

Anyway, I have some important announcements to make as well.

Jackson and I are going to be holding an event here in Michigan six to eight weeks from now.

So mark your calendar six to eight weeks from now within that time frame, give or take.

It's going to be in Michigan. It's going to be in Metro Detroit. I don't know how much of you are going to be able to attend that. I don't want you to

go bankrupt, buying plane tickets, or I don't want it to be too much of an expense on your part but if it's feasible

for you if it's if it's within your means I'd like you to show up I'd like the guerrillas to show

out and come because uh you know, and be normal. That's our slogan. But that's something that's

going to be happening. And it's not going to be the organization we're launching. We're not going to be

launching the organization. At that point,

we're going to be launching something else related to the organization, but very relevant to it.

And it's going to be very important. And that's something we're going to be doing four to six weeks, sorry, six to eight weeks from now, not four to six.

Six to eight weeks, all right?

And an exact date, we're going to have it locked down as soon as we booked the venue.

So don't worry about that.

But we will release the exact date pretty soon.

We're working on it.

And stay posted.

Okay?

A lot of interesting things, like I said, are going to be happening this year.

And it kind of sucks a lot because...

It kind of sucks a lot because this is also an election year, and I don't care about the election.

I don't care. I mean, I only care about it within the context of the American Civil War, I guess, but it's like I have, there's more important things going on than the U.S. election. That's all I'm trying to say. Okay, it's not that important.

Yeah, it's going to be Biden versus Trump.

And if it's not that big whoop, it's going to be some surprise.

Who cares, right?

Who cares?

No, you don't have to suit up.

You don't have to suit up. It don't have to suit up it's not that

you know you can you can just not

dress in a ridiculous

manner um

so

so yeah

I mean if it's Nikki Haley

running for office,

this, I don't, I don't,

I don't even know why I have to pay

attention. I mean, yeah, the elections

are rigged, you know, I think we're kind of

I know the election matters. It does matter.

It's just, we are not going to do organizing in relation to the election.

That's what I'm trying to say.

We're not, oh, yeah, we should canvas to vote.

You know, I don't know why organizations feel the need to respond to elections every time

they happen like okay either a they're going to do canvassing for the democrats or b we need to

spread adjut prop about how we need to oppose both bourgeois parties, you know, don't vote for the

Democrats or the Republicans vote for my party. And it's like, you know, maybe instead of, thank

you so much, Juzon. Nifosburgs couldn't handle 15 minutes in Detroit.

Yeah.

That's true.

But what I'm trying to say is, you know,

when it comes to election years, it's like, these are not as big as you think,

you know, in terms of their actual impact on politics. And whether it's an election year or not, I think what organization should be focusing

on the most is building hegemony, building their own institutions, building their own

organizations, which do things tangibly for people.

I'm not just talking about charity, but organize people in ways that the bourgeois hegemony is not

capable of doing. And in the information age, it's really hard to understand how that works, because it's not canvassing and knocking on doors to get people to vote. That might be part of it if you're fielding a candidate yourself, but it really comes down to understanding what you have to offer that no one else does.

It's kind of just like economics.

If you want to be an organization, what do you offer that no one else offers?

Start there.

I'm not talking, and I'm not talking about your policy prescriptions either.

I'm talking about the way in which you're organizing people's lives,

the way you're making sense of their lives.

Like, what are you offering that no one else is?

You know,

one of the ways socialist organizations used to organize people is like they'd have

clubs, you know, they'd have different kind of recreational clubs and activities, and they'd have

just things like that, you know, like you're offering a higher form of socialization.

You're offering a higher form of socialization. You're offering a higher form of community.

I'm not saying that's the first and most urgent task of a party, but I'm saying you need to think about things like that if you want to actually have a political presence.

And... want to actually have a political presence. And responding to the election, it's just tiring.

All these elections every year, it's just not exactly the move, okay?

It's not exactly the move.

The most important thing

is building close

ties in contact

with the workers

with the working class

that's what's important

but nobody does that

everyone just kind of

shouts at them

I But nobody does that. Everyone just kind of shouts at them.

I don't know if I should even respond to this.

Apparently there's a new Trotskyite organization in New York or something.

And I just don't feel the need to respond to it because it's like they're Trotskyists.

Being a Trotskyist is as remote from anything we're doing as like if you're a Scientologist. It's like, okay, you might use some of the same symbolism, but you're not

a competitor. You're not

a legitimate competitor to us.

You're not like, you're not even

using our same brand, really.

I don't really care about Trotskyites.

They're not, they don't live in my world.

You know, I don't know. Like, oh, well, they don't live in my world, you know, I don't know.

Like, oh, well, they're calling themselves communists.

It's like, well, Hitler called himself a socialist.

It doesn't mean anything to me.

Another thing I wanted to say is, um, on that note,

give me a damn sec, me a damn sec.

Give me a sec.

What was I just going to say?

What was I just going to say?

Ah, okay, I remember. I actually remember.

You know, I was talking about the other day in our ex-space, the whole thing about Bolsheviks, and the word Bolshevism.

Like, a lot of people, they're like, who were the Bolsheviks? What were they? And it's like, you know what I feel like a simple response could be? You know, to dispel the idea that there's like some kind of like ethnic interest behind the Bolsheviks is the Jews or whatever. It's like, I feel like instead of just, we shouldn't even mention Jews, first of all, like, it's not relevant, right?

I think the best response should be Bolsheviks were motivated by drumroll ideology.

It's not exactly true because Marxism isn't an ideology, but I feel like people will get it when you say that. No, the motivation was an ideology. It was an idea because it's so powerful when you think about it in those terms. Like, because I remember what Stalin said.

He said the Bolsheviks are like a, it's so cool.

It's so based how he described them.

He said, he compared the Bolsheviks to a religious military order, like knights, like an order of knights, like a religious military order, like the Hashashin, which is so true.

It's like this militant order based on belief, ultimately, based on the belief in something, right?

And it's kind of like Dugin's phrase of like the Knights Templar of the proletariat.

But like that's kind of what the Bolsheviks were.

And that's, I feel like it's just a simple way of putting it.

Like all the mystery kind of gets honed in when you put it that way.

It's, yes, there's a mystique to it because these are like actual templars.

Like, these are, like, these are, like, militants of the faith.

And people are like, well, what faith is that exactly?

And that's exactly where...

That's what I mean by a positive consciousness and a positive response.

Because it's like...

Because here's the difference, because Bolsheviks or Marxists

actually did believe in absolute knowledge they

believed in the absolute they believed in absolute truth they believe this is the truth of the world

this is the truth of the universe the the the dialectical and materialist outlook is the truth of the universe. The dialectical and materialist outlook is the fundamental truth of being.

The history of class struggle is the totality of human history.

It's like a very powerful, all-encompassing vision and

form of belief that's

incomprehensible from liberal

consciousness, which is why fascists

misconstrued what Bolshevism is.

But Bolshevism is a faith.

It's a form of faith i'm not going to call it a religion but it's a form of faith

it's a militant order of faith you know and that's really what it is. It's like,

it's like, yeah, the Bolsheviks were these, like, ascetic

religious militants, in a way.

You know,

and what religion is that exactly?

It's like, it's the religion of the prophets in actuality. But Marxism, more generally, was like this all-encompassing outlook that spared no room for agnosticism and no room for ambiguity.

It was like, this is the truth. We're here for it. We're going to die for it. We're going to fight for it. We're going to dedicate our entire lives to the cause of the

proletariat. And it was a real faith that they held, you know? And I think that as a motivation

is more, is more, um, how would I put it? It's more

comprehensible to people

than

us quipping about the details

of the ethnic composition, which is a dead-end argument, because we can

show them as much proof as we want, and they're not going to listen to it so you should just say the actual truth it's a it was a it was a militant religious order you know pretty much what Stalin said um and that's so cool.

Like, that's what the Bolsheviks were.

And you think about the way Lenin was buried.

You know, they didn't bury him in some kind of, like,

scientific, you know, they didn't bury him in some kind of, like, scientific, you know, secular...

Bolshevism is not secularism.

The way they buried him was...

They modeled his tomb based on the Tomb of Cyrus the Great.

You know, this kind of connection to the Zoroastrian universal religion, fire, you know, and I personally think, I don't know if this is

an official Muslim view

but in my understanding of Islam

because I've heard and this is the official

Iranian position

Zoroaster

was a prophet of God

in Islam so it's official canon.

Zoroastrianism are people of the book, right?

Zoroastra, if I'm pronouncing him correct, was a prophet of God.

Okay. was a prophet of God. And I believe that.

So it's part of Islam, basically.

You know?

I'm not sure if it's the similar position is held in Judaism or Christianity, but I believe it.

I believe it's the truth, you know, that that it's part of the holy, the great religions, you know?

Anyway, um, that's basically the vibe that we're on

um it's so interesting because

uh we we basically are

actual true believers I don't think anyone else is a true believer we are true believers.

I don't think anyone else is a true believer.

We are true believers.

You know, everyone else

believes in the authority of these various religions,

not because they believe in the religion,

but because they believe in the authority

that the religion is claimed in the name, that

claims the religion, name of the religion, right? Meanwhile, we're here with very little authority

to go off of, and we totally claim it, you know.

So, yeah, Lenin's Tomb is our pilgrimage. Well, it's wrong to put it that way, but it's the truth. I'm going to be honest.

Full disclosure, I consider myself a Muslim. I'm not lying when I say that. I'm not lying when I say I consider myself a Muslim.

But for me personally, there's more importance in visiting Lenin's tomb than there is the holy sites of Islam.

For me personally, I understand if you disagree,

you can't get on board with that,

but that is how I feel.

That's how I feel.

I especially feel that way.

When I look at what Saudi Arabia has done to Mecca, I look at this clock tower they've built and I'm like, really seems like that place is under occupation.

You know, Mecca needs to be restored.

And then,

then I can consider it just as important as Lenin's tomb.

But for now,

I just,

sorry.

Have me burn in hell.

I don't care.

Have me burn in hell.

That's how I feel you know and the another thing i didn't i didn't lay flowers at stalin's grave because I didn't know what the protocol was if that's allowed, if it would be considered, if I'm allowed to do that.

I did visit his grave and I wanted to lay flowers at it

but

it would be kind of awkward to ask

the guards if I could do that

I think they would be a little confused

and

it's such a shame because

I think a few days

yes

a few days after I left

there was an official ceremony

led by the Communist Party

to lay flowers at Stalin's grave

they had a bunch of flowers they gave them out everyone

laid flowers at Stalin's grave together They had a bunch of flowers. They gave him out. Everyone laid flowers at Stalin's grave together. I would have loved to do that. I just, unfortunately, my flight left. My visa expired two days before that happened. So I had to leave. But I did visit his grave. I wanted to lay flowers at it. I also didn't want...

You know, the way it is, is that it's... Everything is so pristine. There's such a sacred aura around everything, around Lenin's mausoleum that

I didn't even know if I would

be allowed to do that

you know because

you know

who am I to leave a flower is like how I was

thinking of it like can I actually

do this or would it be considered littering?

Are the flowers that are there only laid by people who have official positions of importance or prominence in like a ceremonial context?

Basically, it's like I was confused about the funery rights surrounding it.

Like, those are not things you want to mess with.

You know, funery rights are very important.

How you treat graves, the protocol.

I didn't know what that was.

And I didn't have anyone there to teach me or tell me what i was supposed to do but i i the important thing is i treated stalin's grave

and lennon's tomb with the exact amount of respect and reverence that I would for one of the world's great religions, including my own religion, which is Islam.

So I think that's the important thing.

So you don't want to mess up when it comes to things like that.

You don't want to do something that's not allowed or considered out of the ordinary.

But it is kind of a regret that I didn't do it if I was allowed to do it. And I will be back in Moscow.

So there's that. I will be back in Moscow.

Why do I believe in Islam over Christianity?

You know, I think in America I would like Islam to be represented as just a sect of Christianity actually.

There's so many sects of Christianity here, Mormonism.

Islam may as well just be a sect of Christianity in America.

Like, that's how it should be branded, in my opinion.

Because you need to level with people's understanding and where they're at it's according to them. That's what it would be

You could say oh well, it's not that and it's like well how are you going to teach Islam to non-Muslims in America? You're not going to do it by

telling them that this, this, this religion has no continuity with your religion at all. And that's not true. Islam

conceives itself as a, continuity with christianity so i feel like

i also feel like a big mistake that islam made historically is that it underappreciated the role, the historical role of Christianity, which had not been fully exhausted.

I do believe Islam is the last religion, but think islam historically was too quick to assume that the world historical

role of christianity was was finished which it wasn't and that's very important to always bear in mind.

Like, Christianity is not done with having relevance in the world, even if Islam is the last religion, which it is, in my opinion, or in my, according to my faith.

But I think, I think, I'll, I'll tell you why I believe in Islam over Christianity on a personal level.

If I'm allowed to do that.

I try not to talk about these kinds of topics because I don't want to be divisive.

I don't want to be sectarian.

HDG, thank you so much.

And I don't want to give the impression.

I don't want to weaponize my authority as a thought leader and as a guide to you to assert the dominance of one religion or the other. So if you respect me and you listen to the things that I say, I don't want my, I don't

want my, that position I have to be weaponized in a way where like, I pressure you to abandon

your religion and adopt mine. So full discretion. I could be wrong. There's a lot of things I think Islam is

lacking when it comes to Christianity that I see. I'm not that educated. I'm not, I'm not a God. I'm not

like a prophet. I'm not somebody you should

you should learn your religion from. But I'll just tell you my perspective, personally. And that's it, right? Not saying this is the absolute truth. I'm just saying this is how i see it um the reason is

because to me i really like this idea in islam of the seal of the prophets i like this idea that

the message has to be completed the seal of the prophets i like this idea that

the message has to be completed

before the end times

the message must be completed

the word must be completed

totally completed before the end times

in the form of this book in the form of this book, in the form of this, this symptom of meaning, the Holy Quran, right?

Which, which, which I, and I think that renders

concrete the entire

story

of the great religions

through the book, and people think

that's the text, that's the dead letter, and it's

not. The Quran

is a

work of poetry.

It's a work of

it's not like a

direct statement of fact.

It's not a direct

enunciation of the law.

It's meaning

is conveyed indirectly

through the miracle of language

and the signifier. And that

the focus on the symbolic

order that's called in Lacan

his psychoanalysis symbolic order, the signifier,

and the return and redemption of the signifier,

or the rebirth of the signifier, I should rather put it,

after the kind of, what do you call it, the split that was introduced by Christianity between the dead letter

and the kind of phenomenal

beauty, right?

And

I think Islam reconciles

um I think Islam reconciles Jesus' message in a more final way than Christianity does.

And that's kind of why I consider myself a Muslim and not a Christian.

I think Islam is more complete. Because I think in Christianity the idea is that completion will come in the end times.

And I think Islam says, no, the message is complete before the end times happen.

And I just kind of love this idea that like the message is complete.

And now we're just kind of like waiting for the end times.

Like, okay, it's complete.

The mission of the prophets is complete. Humanity finally has absolute knowledge. It has

an absolute understanding of its role. And I like that idea like we already know. And that has

influenced kind of like my Marxism a lot.

Like we already live in socialism.

Like it's already here.

It's already complete.

All we have to do is shed our ignorant, arrogance, shed our conceit and submit to what is already here in islam

the word is submission but what are you submitting to you're submitting to something that's

already been completed that's already here that's already present and that And that's why I'm a Muslim. And it also informs in a lot of ways my

understanding of Marxism. To me, Christianity is not complete. It's not, you know, submit to what's already here it's more kind of like okay wait for the

presence to come to return Jesus's return that's when it will come and I understand

in Protestantism there's this kind of attempt

to make that more immediate

through the word, through the Bible

itself, without any mediation through any

bigger authority.

And it's like there's an attempt... And it kind of seems

like it's similar to Islam there. And

I guess there's room to explore. Finally,

when it comes to Orthodox Christianity, and you ask me, why am I a Muslim and not an

Orthodox Christian, I think the question becomes a little bit more complicated for me, because I feel a great affinity toward Orthodox Christianity on a spiritual and an emotional level, actually.

Not just like a philosophically, actually an emotional level, actually. Not just like a philosophical, actually an emotional level as well.

I kind of schizophrenically believe that both Russian Orthodox Christianity specifically, but I guess broadly, Orthodox Christianity, which I don't know, I always, if you, I always think about it like how in Haji Sophia, like the wall is a little bit covered up, but it's not all covered up. And there's like an icon of like Jesus or Justinian that's there, but it's like partially covered up.

And I feel like that partial, that kind, I don't know if that would be called a liminal space of some kind, between Islam and Christianity, where both of them meet. It's impossible for them to be totally

reconciled. One represents this absolute division that brings us to the past, and then the other

represents this kind of like absolute authority of the future the message that we just

submit to here and now in the presence and I like I don't know if I'm using the word

correctly the liminal space in between both of those is kind of where I am, I guess.

So that's kind of my take on it.

I am not against Christianity.

I'm not against Judaism either, and I don't claim to know it all or, or, you know, have, have all the answers.

But that's just my perspective.

Could be wrong.

Could be totally full of it, whatever.

You know,

it's everyone's job to

it's very

personal, it's everyone's job to kind of figure

it out for themselves.

But I don't, I don't agree

with, the only religion that I'll use as a stick

to bludgeon people with

is Marxism

put it that way

like I'm not going to have an Islam stick

I'm not going to have a Christianity stick

I'll have a Marxism stick

you know as long as you, as long as you can obey a proletarian dictatorship, I don't care what religion you have, have whatever you. It's up to you. It's up to your conscience. Right. But first of all, we need to establish the worldly authority of a proletarian dictatorship. We need to establish a worldly authority of a new type of state which does respond, which is responsive to the absolute of that is humanity you know um a state

that contains the most noble and lofty ideals of mankind that represents a broad and sweeping

vision of the future.

That needs to be built, established, and enshrined, and all need to submit to it.

I don't know if that's...

You know, I don't... Maybe we come full circle, I don't know, but...

I do believe in beating people with the stick of Marxism, specifically the writers of Game of Thrones,

James Lindsay, other kinds of Thrones, James Lindsay,

other kinds of anti-communists.

When I see people bickering over religion on the internet,

I kind of think that they are

mentally handicapped.

I don't consider that something worth bickering over.

You know, like you either believe it or you don't.

I don't know what to tell you.

Some guy tweeting at you or insulting you, it's not going to affect religious belief in any kind of meaningful way.

So that's my take.

I also really like the perennial.

One last thing.

One of the reasons I also prefer being Muslim over Christian is because I think that because Islam claims to be the last religion and the completion of all of the messages bequeathed to mankind by the divine and the final

completion of the absolute message the absolute meaning bestowed to humanity on earth that also

gives it a kind of dynamism in terms of the perennial outlook.

Islam is extremely dynamic.

When you look at it historically, all these Sufi orders or whatever,

extremely flexible and dynamic when it comes to leveling with other religions, like Sufi saints in the Indian subcontinent, literally mastering the Hindu religion, translating it over into the language of Islam and like converting people through that way.

And I feel like there's an, there's, Islam has this like radical perennial outlook, which

finds something sacred in everything. There's a sacredness in all things in everything. There's a sacredness in all things in everything. there's a sacredness in all things in everything there's a sacredness in all

religions you know that it appreciates and i that very much also resonates with me as well.

So, yeah.

That's pretty much it, though. Exposed Rabbi Shmooley.

I don't...

I, you know, I saw something really interesting.

Rabbi Shmuli was in the Kahwa House in NYC.

I didn't know NYC had one of those because we have them in Dearborn.

You know, we have a few of them actually here in Metro Detroit.

I love that place. I actually get coffee from there like every day.

Spoiler!

But I saw a clip of Rabbi Shmuli

walking into an NYC Kahuahah

If you don't know this, it's Yemeni coffee.

He walked into one and he was with his phone.

He's like, you see, why can't all the Muslims be like this?

You know, I love this coffee, really good.

And I'm like, all right, Rabbi Shmooley is kind of mentally ill.

All right. This guy's clearly mentally ill. He's clearly confused. Clearly is just a deeply confused, mentally ill, man.

And yes, his face is, is okay i'll be mean i'll say he's he looks physically disgusting i don't know what is going on here with uh i don't know what that he's got like a rash or something

I don't know what it is

It's just kind of not pleasant to look at

But do I consider him dangerous

No I don't

I just kind of think he's a crazy guy

And if I saw

him in person,

I would not be angry at that guy.

I would just kind of like,

I'd either laugh

or I'd be like, gee, oh man,

this guy,

this guy's here.

You know?

Better turn around and just walk the other direction.

I kind of pity him.

Yeah, exactly.

That's really it.

That's really it.

I just do kind of pity him.

Did he get Candace fired? I don't know.

I honestly think Candice got fired because

because she was talking smack,

I guess, in their eyes

against Israel.

Zionists run the Daily Wire.

Also Judaism.

It's really sensitive topic.

What do you know?

I mean, like, you know, I guess the Daily Wire is owned by Jews, and Candice Owen is talking bad about Judaism or whatever, and then that's what happens.

Or talking bad about Israel, because there's Zionists, not just Jews.

And it's like, you know, like, yeah, that makes sense.

I don't agree with it.

But, you know, I also want to kind of say, because like, why are we acting like the Daily Wire was ever a platform for just like authentic free speech?

I feel like conservatives are the ones losing their mind over the daily.

I always thought the Daily Wire was like a piece of trash.

Zionist trash.

But like these X DailyWire people are like, oh my God, there's this huge battle.

The DailyWire was always trash.

What are you talking about?

When was Ben Shapiro and the DailyWire ever like a platform for people's free speech?

You're just like, oh, the DailyWire just fired Candace for...

And it's like, yeah, I don't think Candice should be fired, but I also don't know what she expects working for the Daily Wire.

What do you expect? I mean, am I crazy for saying that or what? Like you work for

you literally work for Zionists.

What do you expect to happen?

You know, did you think... It's more of a problem when, like, the ADL

or the Zionist lobby

pressures like

third party, like social media to censor.

That's where like, I'm like, okay, I don't, I'm not down with that.

Yeah.

That's a problem.

But I don't know what Candice Owen expected, you know.

Uh, I don't know what Candice Owen expected, you know. The whole Christ is Christ is King anti-Semitic?

No.

I don't know who's saying that. Doesn't seem like it to me. I mean, what, what's wrong with? If you're a Christian, that's literally, it's literally in the name, Christianity. Okay, it's called Christianity. So that's part of what the religion is. If that's what you say, I mean, we say, you know, we Muslims have our own things we say. And I'm sure Jews have their own things they say. So I don't think that's anti-Semitic at all.

If you yell it at Jewish people...

Yeah, yeah, I guess.

If you're antagonizing Jewish people at all

and going up to them and harassing them

because they're Jews,

pretty sure that's... harassing them because they're Jews. Pretty sure

that's

that's yeah, you're

anti-Semitic, you know, but

here's a thing.

I'll

I'll

I'll

probably Here's the thing, I'll, I'll, I'll, um, probably see it as a bigger danger if I start seeing, like, ordinary Jews in real life.

You know, they're, they're starting to get attacked by, like, conservatives or whatever.

Then, you know, because I, because I see, you know, Jake Shields and all these people are,

well, we just want to kind of curb the influence of the Zionist lobby on foreign policy.

And it's like, if that's all you're, that's all you're about and that's all this is about, it's like, okay.

But we have a suspicious eye open, you know, that's the thing.

We have to keep a suspicious eye on what is ultimately going to come of that.

Ultimately, you know.

Also, I want to say something that I think is important, not speaking of, it's kind of completely irrelevant.

But... but I think people should start to appreciate now, especially now, springtime, we're really entering into the heated moments of the election season now is the time where we need we need to reflect and learn from optics messaging the word communism in the right way.

You need to think of it subconsciously and intuitively, and I'll explain it to you, okay?

When you tell people, the number one question

that needs to be on everyone's mind

why is it that immediately

I'm saying immediately without any thought

fascism is more appealing and attractive

to dissident-minded people,

uneducated people than communism is.

That's the number one thing that should be on your mind.

And you need to focus on an unconscious level

of how that confusion arises and why it arises and what mental associations people associate with both, okay?

Because propagating communism is not just, we've been doing it in a factually oriented way. We should keep doing that, but it's not enough. Propagating communist ideas needs to be unconscious. It needs to be intuitive. It needs to make intuitive sense. That's the most important thing, okay?

And I think we're lacking in that department to do honest self-criticism.

We are somewhat lacking in that department.

We need to focus on the right...

We need to be like M.K. Ultra, but for communism, basically. We need to focus on the right we need to be like M.K. Ultra

but for communism basically. We need to focus on the right

trigger words and trigger images

and propagate

communism in the most effective

way because the fascists

already, fascists, they

mastered that. You have to understand something about fascists. They mastered that.

You have to understand

something about fascists.

They are knee-deep

in like all these

esoteric whatever

traditions.

Rosenberg and all these

Nazis were,

like they kind of

were engaging in their own psychoanalysis of, like, how to, like, make this libidinally attractive and appealing to people.

And I kind of agree with Georgia Bataille and the sociological society

the Akafel

where they're like, we need

to also do that for communism in a way, you know?

And

that's like meme warfare, you know,

and some of you are very proficient at it.

I'll name names, Karem knows what he's doing

kareem he's got this down he's not perfect but he understands like how this He understands the move

And I think you guys should learn from his example a little bit

When it comes to like

Counter-Signaling

Memitic warfare

Counter-signaling right-wing Mimetic warfare counter signaling right-wing

Mimetic

vectors of

libidinal attraction

and having communism

Orvo as well

but I

Orvo as well

But like

Yeah yeah A lot of people are great.

I'm just telling you, I'm mentioning him specifically because, like, he kind of understands that the appeal of the right wing is not logical logically based strictly

it's it's very intuitive it's very much

that kind of thing and we need to very much

tap into that and well that's the point of lacan and all this stuff

you know i mean i'm a lacanian

it's on my sleeve i wear it on my sleeve i'm literally a lacanian

infrared i mean infrared is as big as it is because of like the limited extent of lacanian

wizardry that i'm capable of all right there's the me being able to present communism the way I did

had you guys see the light, right?

So we need to like double down and expand upon these methods.

And do better at it. because it's honestly, I'm just to tell you guys the truth.

You tell me, okay, communism is the way.

And it's like, what are you telling them?

Because they hear in their head, like, oh, so you're just giving me a utopia? Where's the edge? Where's the negatives? You know, where's there's, you need to understand. It's like, it's almost like being a pickup artist, you know? It's cringes that sounds. It's like, you don't go up to a woman and just be like, you know, you know what?

Saying nice guys finish lies.

You don't want to be ideological nice guys, you know?

Don't be ideological nice guys.

You don't go up to a woman

and just be like, hi,

I'm a great person.

You know?

Not a good thing.

Hi, I'm a really nice guy.

You don't want to be that equivalent ideologically.

But I feel like 99% of Western communists are that.

The reason Russian communists are not like that,

the reason Chinese communists not like that,

because they have a

patriarchical

tradition of authority.

Communism is authority.

It's power.

That is already

in the unconscious

of their people.

Like, that's what it is.

It's power and authority, right?

Here, what are you selling people?

What are you telling them?

Oh, calm you, I can fix all your problems.

No, we have to be...

That's why Maga communism was a great...

We need to, like, do more Maga Communism,

but not exactly that same phrase,

but, like, more things like that,

which, like, trigger the right associations

in people's heads.

Logo is really good at this by the way he's like super good at it but he um if i ever become rich

like a like a multi-millionaire.

Like, I'm going to like hire a logo as like a meme wizard to just like pump out memes and

shit.

Sorry, excuse my French, but he's just so brilliant at it.

Exactly what I'm talking.

Intuitively being correct.

Not just factually.

Like you have to

make sense intuitively, right?

Anonymous, thank you so much.

Did you hear about Vogue Vulture 2 on X-Lowl?

No. And there's only

one Volk Vulture. Correct me if I'm wrong.

It's our Volk Vulture, and I don't

see the need to entertain

any impostors, so that's what that is.

Well, that's another

donation. Thanks for the donation.

It's kind of weird.

But, uh, you know, the, the thing about communism that I've learned is that, I think, in contrast to Nazism and fascism, indirectness is good.

Thank you so much, Yeet. Appreciate you.

The reason Maga communism was so great, I think it was because of that indirectness.

If you're just...

Now, we need to... Let me lay out the plan for you.

This is very important.

I want you to pay you very close attention.

Very close attention.

Understand my words and understand.

Gorillas.

Very close attention.

So, communist egemony we defend the word communism we assert proudly the word

communism of the capital c we've we've been doing all that that's great we need to keep doing that

but we need to also allocate energy to another important sphere.

Let me explain to you the difference between hegemony as an authority and persuasiveness as a means of compulsion.

Okay.

Now, us standing on business when it comes to communism, very good.

Very good.

We nailed it down.

Now we need to go to another phase, which is not just defending the authoritative tradition

of communism,

but communicating

and conveying and propagating

communist ideas

in an effective way.

Propagating communist ideas and defending the authority of communism are two different things.

They're related. You can't propagate the idea effectively if you don't stand on business.

Lowerty, thank you so much. If you don't stand on business lowity thank you so much if you don't stand on business

you can't propagate the ideas effectively but once you've got the standing on business

locked down now it's time to propagate the ideas effectively a good example of propagating the ideas was maga communism. A good example of standing on business is how we respond to anti-communist propaganda, how we, you know, we rep the red flag, we rep the capital city, we rep Stalin. That's the authority.

Propagation is a, is it, propaganda is a different thing, okay? So, when it comes to

effectively, um, propagating communist ideas

it needs to be

indirect

you don't shove

portraits of

Stalin in people's faces

to convince them

to be communist

you shove portraits

of Stalin and people's faces

to show them we stand on business and we are willing to defend the authority of communism and communism has authority. But it's not enough just for communism to have authority. It also needs to be attractive to people. To make it attractive, it needs to be attractive to people to make it attractive it needs to be indirect

and good examples of that is it needs to be subtle one of the great things about fan whenons

um depiction of communist America is it's kind of very subtle. It's like ordinary America. There's a few red flags. There's a subtlety there that I think is attractive because it's not directly in your face, bombastically, but it's just kind of in the background.

And that's exactly what we need to do. We need to have the motto of socialist realism was socialist in content, national form we need to nail the form thing down we have the content thing down communism hammer circle red flag we have that down but the form is another matter we need to nail that down better. Okay? One of the best ways is just being aesthetically pleasing, having aesthetically pleasing stuff. One of the best vectors to make people interested in communism. The Soviet anthem has probably converted more people to communist

ideas in the west within the last two decades in the internet age than any amount of pamphlets

held out by the street, period.

So, um, that's like very clear, right?

Um, so that's one thing you could do.

Another thing you could do is formulate effective slogans, strategies, narratives, analyses, which, the form of which is not just communism,

but ultimately the content is just indirectly.

So you guys need to understand what I mean by this.

Like,

guerrillas, some of you are lacking in the charisma department

and you need to improve yourself,

you know? Some

of you only are shock troops that

just belligerently...

I'll give you guys a good example

on this you know actually thinking

about it

when they're

when when when people

jq and they're not being aggressive

about it

you don't necessarily have to antagonize them. If they're being aggressive and

like attacking us, sure, yeah, stand on business, right? But if they're not doing that,

you don't need to be belligerent for no reason. Just because someone disagrees with us is not cause for belligerents.

If someone expresses a view that's wrong, you should be patient. You should effectively communicate with them and actually persuade them in a charismatic way.

Now, if they're attacking our authority and they're trying to disrespect us,

and they're disrespecting us specifically, have at it, you know.

But ones in the chat, if you understand this distinction I'm talking about between authority and propaganda.

The two are connected.

You need to maintain both.

We have authority nailed down.

We don't have propaganda nailed down.

You guys get what I'm saying?

You guys are lacking in the propaganda department.

You're doing great on the standing on business defending the authority department, but you're not, okay, some of you don't get it.

That's okay I'm not sure how I could

explain it besides

how I did

but um

let's be mindful of the following fact.

The alt-right has been around since 2016, 2015.

And they only came to the fore because for like a decade, these neo-Nazis on 4chan, elsewhere, they were mastering this tool of propaganda, you know, mastering it.

Very methodically.

We came to the four in 2021 with barely any precedent.

And we catch up rapidly, just like Stalin catches up rapidly,

industrializing in 10 years.

But we need to know what direction we need to go on, because we're serious about replacing, not just replacing, outmoding the alt-right and establishing the neo-Bolshevik

tendency, the communist tendency

as the future.

All that stuff is the past. This is the future.

The cutting edge of that crowd

right now is pushing the Overton window when it comes to talking about Jews, I guess.

But that's a road to nowhere.

That's not cutting edge.

That's not a...

And I guess a lot of the other stuff, too, is the religious revivalism.

I guess they would say that's cutting edge.

You could see that as cutting edge. But we need to tap into the religious stuff in our own way,

disencouraging the larping elements, the cringe larp, but

we need to be fully up front about the fact that Marxism

in a perennial way integrates the spiritual traditions of mankind.

We shouldn't be allergic or shy away from the deeper search for religiosity that is affecting the youth right now.

We've done an excellent job talking to libertarians for a long time.

And... libertarians for a long time and um we need to

we need to wage

an effort that is on multiple fronts, not just one.

And, um,

Bordogal lover, 406.

Hey, that's my alt.

You guys remember my alt,

Bordiga lover, my

famous Twitter alt that totally

is my alt, but is somehow in the chat.

How you doing, man? You've been around

for a long time.

Anonymous.

What about them being nostalgic for the 50s or 80s?

It seems to evoke the right emotion.

No. No.

No, no, this is a mistake.

We need to be very futuristic and have a retro-futurism, if anything, similar to Fon-Wan's works, similar to Xi Jinping works and stuff. There's nothing wrong with retro-uturism, but the vapor wave, nastop? No, no, no. That's not, that's just kind of encouraging homosexuality. Excuse my French. Not meaning to spread hatred, but it's just confusing a psychosexual pathology that we don't want to reinforce.

It's unhealthy and it's false.

So we have to distinguish ourselves.

That's an important thing.

Guys, we're not here to rebrand the alt-right and just like do all the things they did but with a red coat of paint no we need to qualitatively give form to an alternative communist position.

So we're not going to do like, oh, the alt-right memes, but with a red coat of paint.

No.

It's going to be a fundamental difference of aesthetic orientation.

It's going to be a fundamental difference of the emotions it caught.

See, this is the thing.

We're not here to target the same emotions that the alt-right does in people's subconscious.

We are here to target an untapped reservoir, completely different emotions, okay?

The emotions of bigness, of grandness, of wanting to be part of something a loftiness, not the narrow, pornographic, immediate, direct, you know, libidinal satisfaction that far-right ideology gives its victims, but a sense of wideness, bigness, and it's literally the

Sun-Garilla meme we have the power of the sun. It's a wide perspective. It's not a narrow

perspective. It's one that allows you to appreciate the

depth of reality the greatness the bigness of it um the power of the people this you know that

understand this significance of power you know, that understand this significance of power, you know, in the alt-right or fascist

psychopathology, it's a kind of sadomasochistic BDSM thing. For us, power is not power to abuse and victimize people. It's power to do great things.

Power as empower, right? That's like the power of the sun. we have a totally different aesthetic we have a totally

different vibe we're aiming for we're not here to just put a red coat of paint on all the

kinds of strange forms of homosexuality the right wing alt-right cultivates in its victims um no not the roman empire sorry but

we are the byzantine empire we're not the... We're not the Cringe Roman Empire. We're more like the Byzantine and then the Ottomans and then Russia. That's our guys, all right?

We're not the cringe Roman Empire.

If we are the Roman Empire, it's a totally different interpretation.

Like the whole, the Red Centurian...

That's cringe nonsense.

We're more like Byzantine style. All right?

We are a kind of orientalized perspective on the legacy of Rome, not the Western one.

Anyway, yeah, we're the Mongols. That's, yeah, exactly.

Mongols.

Um, exactly. Exactly. Why is the Roman Empire cringe?

It's just kind of like this...

It's not the Roman Empire in reality.

It's more like the way it's remembered

after British neoclassicism

in the 1600s is more or less like

this kind of like stringent um

the whole neoclassical tradition kind of reinterprets the roman empire just kind of like empire of

rationalism it's just kind of like empire of Rationalism.

It's an empire of like stringent, um, logocentric rigidity and rationalism and kind of like anal fixation in psychoanalytic terms we don't want any of that we are the Byzantine Empire we have a kind of more sophianic orientation which

is a

kind of

the depth

of

the

mystical

and the kind

of mystery

you know

that's kind of mystery, you know?

That's kind of where we are.

We're not like this stupid Roman Larp.

But anyway, um... but anyway and then also neoclassicism kind of culminates in

Nazism right? The Nazis are doing the

Hail Hitler salute

it's a Roman, that's what they call it the Roman.

It's neo-class, it's not exactly Rome, it's neoclassicism, it's a Roman. That's what they call it the Roman. It's neoclassicism. It's a specific interpretation of antiquity, according to which it's kind of like this Cartesian rationalist empire, you know, the pure formalism of pure form, right? So that's what we reject completely. And the name of our

enemy aesthetically is this kind of gay, alt-right Roman centurion,

but it's vapor-waved, and then

there's like a black box over the eyes, and it's

like, this is what we lost.

And it's like vapor wave, fake.

And then there's a Sun and Rand or some shit.

It's like, we need to take an RPG

and literally blow that up need to take an RPG and literally

blow that up and launch an RPG

missile at that shit and all the

people who created and just blow

it up. Like, we need to have a

gorilla like the Kool-Aid man, just break through that

fucking shit, through the wall.

Excuse my French.

The power of a sun radiating through it and just burning and exterminating all of the people who indulge in that disgusting

slop garbage

okay

um

so you need to understand what kind of vibe that we're on

all right

definitely not that one

there is also

Stalinist neoclassism

kind of true.

That's not necessarily true, actually.

Socialist realism

incorporated

the good elements

of neoclassicism,

but ultimately

it did away with the formalism.

So, I would actually say Stalinist architecture incorporated neoclassicism.

It incorporated Mediterranean, kind of like Byzantine style.

It seemed like it was incorporating even more like ancient Bronze Age kind of stuff, all sorts of stuff pretty much, mishmashing them together into one like integrated, holistic kind of aesthetic orientation, which was the important thing,

it was substantive.

It wasn't just like an empty, pure form.

Thank you, Anonymous.

Do you have any examples of aesthetics you like most?

I mean, just look at socialist realism, honestly.

That's the best thing

I could tell you for now. But

Stalinist

aesthetics

were substantive,

whereas

neoclassism

by itself is substanceless.

That's the whole point.

It's trying to give an expression of pure formalism,

pure air with no earth.

Stalinist aesthetics is very,

they're very earthly, right?

It's not the pure white marble.

It's colored in.

It's tan a little bit.

It's a little bit brown.

It's a little bit colored in, you know?

You've got some of that Egyptian admixture, you know?

So to speak.

You got that solar

admixture.

It's impure, so to speak.

But it's like,

it's weighty,

it's substantive.

It's human, you know?

It's like Babylonian, not Greek.

Anyway.

Um... Anyway That's kind of what I'm talking about Brutalism

Again, all these kinds of things

Brutalism, modernism,

just like neoclassism,

there's a line of continuity, neoclassicism, you know, that develops into modernism. That develops into, you know, formalism and constructivism and brutalism and high modernism, whatever the hell you want to call it. And it's all based on trying to arrive at the purity of form, right?

Pure formalism, pure geometry, pure mathematics.

In contrast to that, you have the Baroque.

You have the kind of more ornamental orientation which it's not as ascetic it's not as rigid it's kind of more not just pure form but also like substantive

content you know and

it's the dialectical interaction between

both that we need to

we need to arrive at the golden center

basically like

in excess

both are bad in either direction.

It's the perfect golden mean

that socialist realism arrives at

because it's a dialectical form and content, you know?

So yeah.

So yeah, I mean like compare Nazi propaganda to the Soviet kind.

Here's the thing.

Soviet propaganda is swarthy.

Okay, they're white people. Sure, they're blonde, but they're tanned.

They're like

actual people. You know, they're not like this

marble statue nonsense

of like this unhealthy

dead, lifeless,eless pure form it's kind of like a vital

humanity just like the sun gorillas that we have right that's why i say the soviet union was a black

empire like it was black i'm not That's why I say the Soviet Union was a black empire.

Like it was black.

I'm not going to elaborate.

It was like on the side of the black world.

Thank you so much crass. It's like let's say there's a war between the white world and the black world. Thank you so much crass. It's like, let's say there's a war between the white world and the black world.

Like the Soviets were on the side of the black world, all right?

I'm not going to explain or elaborate.

But I'm not going to elaborate.

I just don't feel like I have to.

All right?

Anyway,

50s Democrats would say,

and I'm like

it's not based on

skin color or race

it's like a vibe

like the Soviets

like they were white people

like they were like

I guess racially Caucasian

but it's like

they were on the side

of the black world empire, right?

The white,

and then also there could be black people who are part of the white world empire.

But it's not based on race.

It's more like kind of based on like pure formalism versus

dialectics.

I don't know how else to put it, guys.

I don't know how else to put it.

It's like bignessess like bigness

where's like little merit

you know what I mean like there's a big contrast

like big and powerful

versus like an African elephant

versus like some limp-risted little pencil-neck weakling,

hiding behind some tower,

employing mercenaries using

usurious, fictitious capital

to accomplish their aim

versus like a direct conqueror,

you know, it's kind of,

it's like, I don't know,

I don't know what to tell you guys.

Anyway, I don't know. I don't know what to tell you guys. Anyway,

um, people are like, well, you're anti-white.

And it's like, you know, you might be on to something.

It depends on what you mean if you mean like racially no

but if you mean like if you mean by white

this metaphysical notion of like

formalistic

neuroticism

yeah you're kind of right

I'm not going to lie

like yeah I've always been like direct about that though

like I've always been

I always been kind of up front about that

I don't mean it in the sense of like

actually I'm against white

people it's more kind of like if you if you're like this neo nazi who has this kind of like

neuroticism metaphysical neuroticism

where you're like

you

I don't know how to explain it

you know I don't know

it's not really a racial thing

it's kind of a civilizational thing when you think about it it's not really a racial thing it's kind of a civilizational thing

when you think about it it's like

the crisis of Western civilization

like the inability to come

to terms

with material being

and just kind of always trying to

it's like

the problem of

you know

Dugan has this thing where like

Western civilizations defined by the unity

of Apollo and

Dionysus

but it's like in the

absence of a

Dionysus replaces the female

so instead of a man and a woman

as the foundation like the metaphysical foundation

of your civilization it's like a man

and then a guy pretending to be a woman, basically,

who adopts all the feminine mannerisms

and thinks that they know,

that thinks they can just kind of replicate the essence

of what the female is.

And it's like,

that is kind of a problem, you know?

I don't know. It's missing

the sophianic

element.

Which is the context of the patriarchical authority.

I'm kind of gibbering.

It kind of sounds like nothing, I'm saying.

But if you get it, you get it.

Anyway, I'm getting my...

I already got myself in too much trouble.

Anyway, guys... Anyway, guys.

Anyway, guys, I will see you Tuesday.

Been a great stream.

Had a great time.

Once in the chat, if you had a great time today.

Just a great time.. Just a great time.

Just chilling, hanging out. chilling out maxing all cool

well i don't even know how the song goes um

when's the book out ones, the more you ask,

the longest are you going to say,

okay?

We've had a great stream.

And Tuesday,

we may have it on X.

I haven't decided

all right guys i'm gonna go play Minecraft.

I'm just kidding.

But, uh, no, I got a lot of work to do.

Kind of slacked off last night watching that show so I actually have to do work I'll see you

guys Tuesday I'm trying to think is one last thing I forgot to say.

I'm going to say this and it's not happening.

Like the infrared Minecraft, when we did it in 2021, the first one we did, that was straight up so fun. But we're never doing that again, ever. I'm a grown ass man 27 years old. I kind of miss it. But I'm not going to do it. Because at a certain point, guys, you have to say, like, you know what?

Listen, video games sound fun.

I'm a grown-ass man.

It's not for us anymore.

It's just not.

But it's true.

You could be 40 years old and still playing video games because they actually are fun.

You know, there's never an age where you're going to, like, get bored of video games.

So you need to actually put a line in the sand and be like, I am too old for this.

I'm not doing it.

After I got back from Russia, that's what I was.

I was like, I haven't, I'm like, I'm not, I'm done.

I'm not playing any video games ever, even just like check them out.

You know?

But it was good times, and that's the truth.

It was fun. video video games can help elderly surgery patients avoid dementia.

I didn't know that.

But I'm trying to think, like,

there's no game that was made better than Minecraft When you think about it.

I'm trying, there's all hell divers and...

You ever see those TikTok videos of that guy who's like,

pretending to be a boomer?

And, um,

he,

he's like doing a skit where he's like he's going up to the uh plant people

he's at he's at like a home depot and he's in the plant section and it's like uh pov you meet a boomer

who thinks he's the only person that exists.

Something like that.

And he like goes up to the,

uh,

he goes up to like the employee and he's like,

you guys don't happen to have an Acadia tree, do you?

You know what that is, right?

And then the guy's like, uh, let me just, um, yeah, sure, let me just look it up in my system.

And then the boomer's just like, and he just walks away like, do it.

I love it so much.

Did you guys see that?

You guys know what I'm talking on.

Are you like an old person?

Like, they're just walking away like that.

Dismissive hand wave.

Yeah, that's the guy who does the average reddeter skit like i've seen

like all his videos not all of them like a lot of them at this point

i can't dig it up but it's like so on point

i don't know who is. Who is that guy?

Is that guy like the CIA?

Because he's so good at what he does.

It's like he's so on point.

Like, yeah, like average redditor.

Like he's so, I don't know how he, like, that guy's a genius.

What's wrong with him?

It's like so

on point. I don't even know how to

put it, you know? Anyway, yeah,

the slappable jerk, that's his name.

Anyway, guys, I do, I got it going up.

I do gotta go now. See you guys later.

Stay out of it, liquor. Bye-bye. Oh my god, I'm smart

My boy, infrared, man

I appreciate you, bro. Thank you, I love you man

I love you so much man

Realist in the fucking game bro. You are the realist in the motherfucking game bro. I love you bro.

Holy, open up. See, I'm smart. Tell me I'm dumb or not. She won't know I'm here. But I needed the knife. I missed.

Turn around, please.

I missed up.

What? Me?

Yes, you. Hands behind your back. Let's go. Hold still.

Hey, you're hurting.

I don't know what you...

I don't know what you...

This is a mistake.

Thank you, thank you, I don that bro. Thank you, man.

I don't.

You must be, look.

Ida.