🔴 RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸

Stone with you.

You're not going to be able to do it.

Actually, but that's ready with all

Robusta wheels get out.

Madieuski.

Midwest Singh with the five.

I see you, brothers.

Stalin Berry, Agulag.

What's going on, man?

I see you.

The fuck is up, everybody?

Ah, excuse my friends, off to a bad start.

Gotta work on that.

Gotta work on that.

Guys, you know the funny thing about LARP?

Like the music video I just showed you about United Eurasia?

You know, we think to ourselves, oh, that's just like some hoi four.

That's, you know, a lot of people on the internet they always accuse me, uh, oh, hoi for hoi, I don't even know what the fuck that is.

I had to look it up.

Hearts of iron four.

Apparently, it's a dumb game where you can't even like you don't even take control of the guy and shoot people.

You ha it's just like, I don't know, it's a text-based game or something.

Don't understand any of that.

I like games where you can, you can be the guy that's running around and doing stuff, shooting people and.

Blowing stuff up, but anyway, um, wow, crass, what's going on with the one?

What's up, man?

Anyway, I uh

I wanted to say, you know, it's so funny because like

Things like that video are literally what people in like some Eastern European conflict or in Ukraine for that matter pick up guns and go and take bullets for.

Like inspired by stuff like that on YouTube.

I'm not even kidding.

Psyop Shorty, what's up?

It's like people have everything so topsy-turvy.

Like LARP, LARP has actually become a factor in geopolitics.

It's become a motivating factor in increasing the morale of soldiers and motivating them to fight and die for things.

Additionally, I remember the golden days of YouTube where

The beef was incredible.

The Balkan beef, such as the conflict between Gay Rees and Monkey Donia.

If you don't know what I'm talking about, you are not a veteran of the true internet.

But things like that, it'd just be a video of like some low it's like a 144p video of monkeys dancing, some Greek guy saying this is what Macedonians look like, and there would be like firefights over that.

There'd be wars declared over shit like that.

I also remember when YouTube was banned in Turkey in the two thousands because there was a YouTube video, another one forty four P video.

Um it was supposedly it was insulting Ataturk by it was like a floating face CGI of Ataturk saying some things in a language I don't understand, but it wa it was very offensive to the Turkish government, so they banned YouTube entirely.

They sh probably should have kept it banned, to be honest.

If I'm being honest, and built their own internet.

But here we are.

Here we are.

Red Saffron with the five.

Wow.

Thank you, brother.

I see you.

Thank you so much, Red Saffron.

Guys, I have a lot to talk about tonight.

I would never just hit the live button with absolutely nothing prepared to talk about.

It's not my style.

I'd never do that.

Are you kidding?

I'd never do that.

We have a lot to talk about.

I have a lot prepared for you tonight.

Don't worry about it.

We're totally not just going to wing it and see what's going on on Twitter and just chill.

But to be honest, there was something I did want to mention.

Give me a second.

Give me a damn second.

Uh hold on.

Something I wanted to show you.

Okay, this is something we should talk about.

The South African elections were today, they went to the polls.

if you can believe it.

That was today.

The last time they had elections was in twenty nineteen.

And this time it I don't know what the exit polls are looking like for the EFF, for the speculated polls.

I don't know exactly what those are called.

But I mean, I don't.

Is there a chance?

Let's actually check that out.

This should probably be where I South Africa polls.

Let me see.

Mm.

A are there like uh what are those s what are they called?

What are they called?

Uh South Africa general election.

Opinion polls, that's what it is.

Okay, so the EFF, all right, it's not slated to win according to the opinion polls.

Okay, apparently A and C is just gonna win again.

That sucks.

I was actually really surprised in twenty nineteen when the EFF did not win.

I thought they were actually gonna win.

Shows how little I understood South African politics.

But listen, the EFF is here to stay.

You know, they've clearly affected South African politics irreversibly and regardless of whether they win or not, it doesn't matter.

They're here to stay.

Um we will see Julius Malemma in power one day.

I have no doubt about that at all.

I have no doubt about that whatsoever.

But I wanted to talk about it because I constantly keep getting people

I constantly uh am getting people bothering me from actually both

Leftists and right wingers

And they keep pointing out the EFF's uh pro-LGBT politics and by pro-LGBT politics they are against the apparently widespread violence that exists in South Africa against sexual minorities.

So apparently that should apparently that should affect my opinion on them for some reason.

Meanwhile, we have these pan-leftists who have nothing in common with Melema, who denounced Milemo for years as a toxic, masculine fascist or whatever.

Infrared, I mean, we were repping Melema since 2016, 2017.

You know, we've always upheld the EFF and we've we've maintained our stance on that.

But they keep s you know, they keep trying to make it seem like this is somehow a contradiction.

I'm kind of tired.

I shouldn't get tired.

I should be more zen about it because it's to be expected that you get these uh

Complete freaking bourgeois idiots, as Jason Unruh would probably put it, who don't understand that contradictions are not a problem for us.

We can handle contradictions.

Okay, they're like, Oh, isn't it a contradiction that you guys are critical of the um international network of pro-LGBT NGOs and stuff, and yet simultaneously uphold EFF, which also seems to have some relationship to that through their student organizations?

And my answer to that is is it a contradiction?

Maybe, but what's wrong with contradictions?

I mean, where where did you get the idea that Marxist Leninists

Whose entire outlook and worldview is predicated upon the recognition of contradictions are somehow impervious to contradictions.

Like, you're somehow getting us by pointing out a contradiction.

All you're pointing out is an objective contradiction that actually exists in reality, which we also recognize.

This is exactly why everyone should read Carlos's book.

Both right-wingers and pan-leftists have a purity fetish.

They somehow have this idea that the default that to have a consistent outlook means to have one that is devoid of contradictions.

And nothing could be further of the truth.

To have a consistent and principled outlook means to have a consistent relationship with objective contradictions.

It's not about whether your worldview involves contradictions, it's about which contradictions.

That's what's important.

Liberals simultaneously call everyone Nazis while supporting Nazis in Ukraine.

We are keen on pointing that out all the time, but it's also an objective contradiction that actually exists in reality.

We're seeing it in real time with the erosion of liberalism and its transformation into fascism.

A contradictions are real.

They actually exist.

They're actually real.

And

We don't we're not we're not queasy about contradictions.

We don't we don't get scared of them and somehow, you know, change we our our world view is not defined around trying to be purely formally consistent.

The consistency of principle is not the same as formal consistency.

Formal consistency is one sided.

The consistency of principle, as a matter of principle, involves a dialectical relationship between form and content.

Which means it involves a consistency of contradiction.

Class struggle is a contradiction.

It's like someone saying, How could you be a Marxist or a communist?

Well, how could you say that we live in a society and a specific mode of production while that mode of production also has class antagonisms and struggles within it?

It's like, well,

Well, maybe you just don't understand maybe you're just making a lot of assumptions.

Maybe you're just making the assumption that, you know, everything is reducible to the form of an idea.

Maybe you just lack dialectics.

You ever thought of that?

Anyway, to to get back into the matter at hand.

When it comes to the EFF and their social views Liam Neeson, wow You brown bastard.

You read brown bastard.

Well, Liam Neeson, thank you for the five, but those are pretty hurtful words, I'm not gonna lie.

I I expect better from you, to be honest, Liam.

You know, the guy from Taken and the guy Kwai what's his name?

Kwai Gonjin from Star Wars The Phantom Menace.

I expect you to, you know, aren't you supposed to be the good guy or something?

Anyway, as I was saying, um, we we don't have an issue with contradictions.

Um

I'm going to say this for the last time because people seem to think for the EFF doesn't die on that hill in terms of canceling or wanting to murder people that have disagreements with them over this.

The EFF really disagreed with Uganda's anti-homosexuality bill or whatever, but they also received the creator of that bill on a separate issue.

They received him and let him speak on a different issue pertaining, I believe, to Pan-Africanism.

And those and is that a contradiction?

Well, no more than reality itself is contradictory.

The EFF has the maturity to be able to disagree with him on this minor issue, while also recognizing that that doesn't mean that you're going to completely write off everything the Ugandan government is doing and the officials in the Ugandan government on other matters.

So the EFF doesn't have a purity fetish, right, like the Western left does.

And that's the difference.

Okay, the EFF understands the nuances.

They don't crucify people on these minor issues.

They have their own views, and it's within their right to have their own independent views on things like this.

I'm not claiming I have all the answers.

I have a specific perspective on this.

I can't really cancel people and go after them for disagreeing with me, especially if they're disagreeing with me in a principled and rational and a way that doesn't erect arbitrary, discursive barriers.

So that's really what we're not the ones with the purity fetish on this issue.

It's our enemies who are.

Finally.

Um

I don't understand why that specific, such a niche position they have should f should make it somehow that we overlook all the other things about them.

That doesn't make any sense to me.

A party is consistently anti-imperialist, consistently pro-multipolarity, supports Putin, supports Russia and China, supports Iran, supports the Palestinian resistance, has one of the most advanced, comprehensive political programs of any mass socialist organization that's not in power in the 21st century.

They are reintroducing the topic of land reform back into modern politics, and I'll I guess I'll talk about that in a second.

Um and we're supposed to not like them because of this minor, minor disagreement we potentially might have and we're not even in a position to disagree with them on it.

Why?

Because it's the business of them and the South African people to decide that.

It's the EFF's business.

It's it's i their stance on cultural issues

Are between them and the people of South Africa.

That's who's going to decide.

It's, it's, it's, that's their relationship, that's their.

um business you know it's not in our business to intervene in that doc you know personally do i have my own opinions uh on on potential i'm not south african i don't know anything about south african politics i suspect that it may not be the best strategy to pursue or it may not be the best position to have it may not be the most reflective of the position of the masses um it may be an out of touch position from their may not be doing enough to take into consideration their perspective but i am not claiming to know that with any certainty i just maybe can have you know my own uninformed impressions on the matter

But it doesn't matter because it's none of my business anyway, right?

I, I, you know, people don't understand this.

I don't have a purity fetish, and I don't mistrust the people, I trust the people.

I trust humanity, I trust masses, right?

I trust the masses.

to make sure that the political authorities which are representing them are responsive to them, take into account their perspective.

I trust the masses will keep the people who represent them in check.

I trust the position of the masses is ultimately a good position.

I trust the wisdom of the masses.

I trust that societies form coherent, rational,

unities.

They form coherent and rational uh

Commons, a common sociality, a common social logic.

I'm confident in that.

I don't believe in being a Pharisee.

I don't believe in, you know.

I don't believe in attacking and and uh

You know, scolding the masses for not being enlightened enough on any issue for that, whether it's a right-wing thing or a pan-leftist thing.

I don't believe in scolding the masses.

I don't believe in waging vain campaigns of you know, I understand the need to be principled and you know, be a voice for the voiceless and speak unspoken truths, even uncomfortable truths, but I ultimately believe.

The masses will be correct.

Again, I hate to be such a religious nut, but you look in the stories of the Bible, you look in the stories of the Holy Quran, right?

And you see the prophets speaking against the corruption of their societies.

And at first their message is not well received.

But time passes and what happens?

Eventually, people cannot ignore the truth of their message because they feel it's intuitive truth.

They can't ignore it.

They can't repress it.

They can't deny it.

That becomes something powerful.

It becomes something inescapable.

There's just no way to cope with it.

It becomes an objective force on its own right, right?

That's the logic in our religions.

That's the logic in the Bible.

That's the logic in the Quran, right?

The logic isn't, you know, I need a form.

I need to form this kind of uh

Exclusive, pure community that scolds the masses for not being enlightened enough.

Again, whether you're some kind of religious LARPer or you're a pan-leftist woke scold, it's the same thing in my eyes, right?

You don't have faith in the masses, you don't trust them.

I feel that in order to have a relationship with God you need to have almost a mystical connection with the masses, with the people you need to have a reverence and respect for the wisdom of the people.

Our relationship to God is given to us.

Our relationship to the divine is defined by our relationship toward mankind as a whole, toward our communities, toward our peoples, toward masses of people, masses of anonymous people who will never meet on a personal level, but who nonetheless exist, who nonetheless we can establish a relationship toward mentally, spiritually, psychologically, and ideologically.

That's my position.

Um

You know, so many people try and create red lines.

around arbitrary positions, which in no way

reflect the objectivity of the contradictions, which in no way reflect any kind of primary contradiction.

You know, you're you're it's ultimately a vanity and I completely oppose it.

Completely op I am I oppose it entirely actually.

But

I don't want to ramble on this topic too much.

I just wanted to.

I mean, it's just kind of so silly, you know?

It's so silly.

And another thing you have to keep in mind is something we shouldn't underemphasize.

And I used to kind of have you guys ever seen that image of like, I got your back, you got my bre bl back, bro.

And it's like a black guy who's like a black nationalist, Pan-African, and then it's the white guy with the Confederate.

shirt and they're like

They're like uh pounding fists or whatever.

And yeah, the only thing the establishment fears, and it's like, I got your back.

I got your back, too.

Anyway, I kind of used to think that was the correct.

And I think there's still truth to it.

This kind of it's kind of like the Black Panthers Rainbow Coalition.

You're bringing together all these kinds of nationalists in America.

But

I simultaneously, and this is why it's important to have dialectical thinking.

I don't think you should one-sidedly get too caught up.

in the romanticization and glorification of a kind of confederation of separatists.

Because I think that's one sided.

I'm not here to neglect and erase that component and that aspect of American national solidarity, because it is one, right?

American national solidarity should include people's various different kinds of

you know, traditional forms of communal identity, including black nationalism.

Um but I also think that one of the reasons things like the Black Panthers uh Rainbow Coalition

Was so appealing and so powerful is because it was kind of revolving around something that was missing.

It was almost a kind of

How should I put this?

It was almost kind of a symptom of a missing unified American national identity, a unified American

sense of national belonging and community, that is, beyond the racial differences.

So on the one hand, you have this kind of mentality of a confederation of kind of

Forms of ethnic separatism or whatever.

But then on the other hand, I think that.

Belies.

I don't know if that's the correct word to use.

That really.

That unity, that confederate unity in the form of confederation, is trying to speak into existence a more fundamental unity that is more than the sum of its parts.

That's not just a unity of the young patriots and black nationalism, right?

It's not just the unity of all these different forms of racial nationalism.

It's a more fundamental unity of American nationalism.

I wouldn't call it identity, I'd just call it existence, right?

And I'm not talking about this necessarily and and exclusively in the sense of MLK because I'm a big Malcolm X guy.

I understand ma um um and Midwestern Marks people point this out all the time that MLK has a and and um

An irreversible significance for American history.

But there's truth to MLK, right?

There's truth to that response to ya to MLK that formed afterwards.

Which in no way I'm against, right?

But what I'm trying to say is that

Not you know

We should be keen on emphasizing

An America Beyond Racial Distinction.

Which is not just within the narrow confines of a dream of racial unity, but an actually existing racial unity, one that already exists.

Objectively, and I think it's fair to say there is a racial unity that exists objectively in America.

You go to any factory, at least here in Detroit, and it's multiracial.

The workplaces are multiracial now.

It society is increasingly but it's not multiracial in the sense of HR.

It's like, you know, it's like these white communities, these trailer parks where like, you know, people just kind of mix and intermarry with indigenous people and it's totally and Mexicans and it's totally normal.

So you need to understand something about America today.

Multiracialism.

I don't know what you would call it.

Is not an ideological project.

You know, the reactionaries were trying to make that a

Portray it as an as an ideological project of intermixing or whatever, uh, fifty or or eighty years ago or something.

Maybe in the past there was a idealism in and I don't know, but today it's not.

There's no idealism to it.

MAGA supporters that have that red MAGA hat are marrying Latinos and Latinas.

You know, they're mixed with indigenous.

They don't care about racial purity.

That's why.

The white nationalists in America are such an antisocial, irredeemable force.

Because among the actual American masses, nobody cares about racial purity.

Nobody cares.

There's maybe some small pockets of some towns in America where they still care about that.

I doubt that the new generation does, though.

It's not being carried forward into the next generation.

So there already is, after the civil rights movement, an American national identity which I don't think is white or black or brown or whatever.

I you know, even Europeans mock Americans.

With the memes they made of like El Gablino and What is the other one?

Uh what is the other one?

It's like

What is it called?

El Gablino and La Critura and then what else?

El abominissio or something.

But they're basically trying to say that like Americans are so they're just racial abominations.

But you know what?

We Americans should respond to that and be like, Yeah, we're fucking Americans.

This is what we are.

We're Americans.

That's what an American is.

And that's not to say everyone has to look like that.

That's not to say people have to mix and not, you know, be with people that look like them, as Keith Woods would put it.

Everyone is welcome.

I mean, it's part, it's, but that's part of our nation.

And you see, in Russia, Chechens want to be with Chechens.

That's totally cool.

It doesn't make them any less Russians.

Ethnic Russians want to be with ethnic Russians only.

That's totally cool.

It doesn't make them any less Russians.

But if they want to mix with each other, that's also totally cool.

See?

Doesn't make them any less Russian.

It's pretty common.

If, you know, people from Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan in Russia are mixing with ethnic, it's like totally fine.

So you see, same thing for America.

We should have a big, lofty vision of what America is.

And anyone who's trying to promote some kind of racial exclusionism

is an enemy of any kind of American communist project, period.

I used to be sympathetic to the whole separate the black separatism stuff.

And then I realized it has no leg to stand on.

It's simply not viable.

It will never happen.

Because black people in this country are so inexorably connected with white people.

And there's no getting around that.

There's no I mean, yes, they are different communities and there's different cultures there.

But those cultures in part are formed around however negative or positive the relationships they have with each other as communities.

So we have a common American civilization.

We have a common American reality.

Petty racialism

only serves to divide us.

It only serves and it's exac I mean, it's it's it's it's exactly what the ruling classes intended.

It's adverbatum what they said.

How do we protect our property against the masses?

Against the hungry masses and the toiling masses, we divide and conquer.

We divide them on race, we divide them on all this other kind of stuff, right?

But here's the thing, that doesn't mean people have to ignore their heritage.

That doesn't mean people have to suppress their heritage and dissolve their heritage and liquidate it.

American civilization is inclusive of all these different peoples' particular heritages.

It's inclusive of that.

So it's an inclusive, it's an inclusive kind of identity.

And I wouldn't even call it an identity necessarily, but it's an inclusive shared civilizational reality.

It's an inclusive nation.

You know, China did not go the way of Russia.

in terms of creating a confederation of different nationalities and ethnicities, the Chinese were very insistent upon one China, one Chinese nation.

One Chinese nation that's multiethnic, that's multilingual, sure, but one Chinese nation.

And I think we should

We should learn from that.

And again, I'm not saying be one-sided.

I'm just saying too often I see people neglect that aspect of the American Union, right?

All these people claiming, Oh, I'm America first, I'm it's No, you're just a white nationalist.

You're not America first.

You're just a white nationalist.

And your your vision doesn't square with the sentiments, with the reality and with the wisdom of the American people.

I'm not saying the American people have politically correct views on race generally.

They don't.

No one's claiming that.

But how how common is it really for Americans to really just say, you know, this this should be a country just for one race, where one race is supreme over others?

That's not a matter of ideology.

You go and talk to an ordinary common man who has no

No um heavy investment in any particular ideology, no heavy investment in any particular political views.

And what will they tell you?

Judge a man by his character rather than the color of his skin.

That is the that is the thing that is why Midwestern Marxists is right to point out how the civil rights movement was a kind of third American revolution, I think.

Just in the sense that it really did irreversibly change the fabric of American consciousness.

And yes, Malcolm X was correct.

The Black Panthers were correct.

Others are correct.

Civil rights has been warped and twisted, just like in Reconstruction.

A lot of corruption happened in the Reconstruction era.

But does that mean we're against the Union in the Civil War?

Absolutely not.

So our attitude toward the Civil Rights Movement should be exactly the same thing.

There's still a kernel of redeemability that was there.

There's still a kernel of historical authenticity, a revolutionary kernel in the civil rights movement, which is manifested not in DEI and not in all this kind of crazy attempts to extend civil rights logic to sexuality and all this other kind of stuff, but just in the ordinary, just in the way that American consciousness has changed.

You know how Americans now take it as an axiom.

It doesn't have to be forced on them.

They really believe it.

That you should judge a man by his character, not the color of his skin.

That we are all created equal in the eyes of God.

You know?

That you can't exclude people just based on their race, just based on their background.

And I think that is that has had an irreversible effect on the development of American national identity.

And I think people overlook that a little too much.

I think people neglect that, you know, they they take it for granted is the problem.

People really take the civil rights move for for granted, I think, you know.

I don't you know, I'm not a fan of how Caleb Maupin tries to make it seem like he's the next MLK and like LARPs.

We don't need MLK anymore.

MLK was already a thing, okay?

And there was a lot of limitations to MLK.

Again, I'm more of a Malcolm X guy, right?

But let's also not take it for granted.

Let's not take it for granted how we've all come to an agreement as a society that America is more than just one race or more than a few races, that this is something that transcends these petty and parochial racial differences that we got from the old world.

There are differences that existed and still exist in the old world.

came to this soil, came to this land, you are an anti American if you are trying to impose the differences of the old world on the new world.

You are an anti American.

If you are somehow trying to maintain

These boundaries that were created on another continent here just because of what genetic lineage.

As scientists prove that genes aren't even real in the first place, so it doesn't even matter.

Literally, did you see that new article where this guy is like, yeah, we pretty much figured out that uh DNA um

doesn't function as a gene and it actually itself is something that uh the mutations within DNA are not random, they're responsive to the relationship and interaction the organism has with its surroundings.

And it's like, huh, it's like exactly what Lysenko said, right?

But we're crazy for being Lysenkoists.

But I digress.

The old world is the old world.

This is America.

America is a unique national project.

It's a unique history.

America is not an amalgamation of ethnicities from the old world trying to coexist.

America is a new national project to build a civilization that has never existed before on earth.

America is a project to build a civilization, to build a state, to build a society that has never been seen on the face of the earth before.

That's what America is.

America is about building a new

National reality.

It's about building a new nation, a new civilization, a new history.

One that incorporates older ones, sure.

But one that is ultimately for this continent, for this land.

We're not here to be colonizers from the old world onto this land.

We are here to adapt to this land, to build a civilization, a state, and a society based on a relationship to this land and no other land.

And as the son of immigrants, I have no problem saying that if you're not on board with that project, pack up your bags and fucking leave.

If you want to be a white nationalist, go back to Europe.

If you want to insist.

You know, on some kind of other form of ethnic separatism, go to the place where that ethnicity comes from.

America is an American project.

We're not here to be white, black, brown, yellow, or whatever else.

We're here to be red.

That's what being an American means.

You say, oh, so Haas, you're saying race doesn't matter and it doesn't exist?

No, I'm saying that you're an idiot and you're not qualified to talk about it.

You should shut your mouth beyond the casual observances you make in your day-to-day life, which everyone can make, that there are clearly differences between different ethnic groups and different cultural groups.

You are not qualified to speak on the matter.

All you have is what we all have.

But when you try to theorize the matter, it flies over your head.

And what are you going to say?

Oh, Haas, you're just yapping because you're a fucking idiot.

Shut your mouth about race if you're not willing to explore the topic of ethnogenesis.

If you're not willing to explore the topic of exactly what a race supposedly is.

What does constitute an ethnos or an ethnicity?

You don't explore these topics with any manner of depth.

You simultaneously want to uphold that we should just take it as self-evident that the social, the ethnic distinctions that came from the old world are eternal forms.

They're eternal platonic forms that will just exist forever because of genetics.

That's fucking nonsense.

Different ethnicities come to be in a specific way based on a people's relationship both to their own history and to the land that they live on.

They are not static categories that exist for all eternity.

And if you're not willing to explore, like look, there are differences based on different histories and lineages between various different groups in America.

Nobody's denying that.

But what we're claiming is to be an American, to believe in the American National Project, to believe in an American union, means that those differences will coalesce into a united lineage, a united history, a united and shared common reality, which doesn't dissolve those differences or deny them or liquidate them, but integrates them into something more, a whole that is more than the sum of its parts.

That's what the American National Project is.

That's what it means to be an American.

If you don't agree with that, leave, pack up your bags, and go somewhere else.

You don't belong here.

Who says Haas?

This is the same as liberalism.

This is again another stupid nonsense gibber point you're making.

If you're talking about neoliberalism,

You're talking about this kind of um

this kind of it w what what Stalinists would call it cosmopolitanism, national nihilism, which liquidates the unique histories and lineages and cultures of various different peoples, amalgamating them into one kind of

Purely institutional culture where it's just purely defined by the negation, purely defined by some abstract equality and human rights and stuff.

That's not what I'm talking about, though.

I'm talking about the specificity and the particularism of the American National Project.

The American National Project isn't just defined by everyone being the same.

It's a specific project based on a unique relationship between the people and the land and the history here.

It's something specific.

It's a specific civilization that I'm talking about.

It's a specific history that is in the process of being born.

So this is another stupid thing people say.

Um

I mean people s people all say, Well, well, Haas, wasn't the Civil Rights Movement co-opted?

Yeah, but so was the Civil War.

So was Lincoln.

Lincoln was also co-opted.

That shouldn't lead you to be an idiot.

And you know, there's no way we're doing CPUSA 2036.

And erasing the CPUSA's uh relationship to that, to the civil rights movement, because it's so fundamental.

Now, but that doesn't mean it's uncritical.

Because that's also the beginning of the end of the CPUSA as we know it, and there's reasons for that.

And we're trying to resolve that and come to an understanding exactly why that was.

But you can't do that by just negating histories entirely.

That's national nihilism, you know?

And look, I'm not saying that it's wrong.

to you know

To have a sense of particularism on a cultural level, on a level in terms of preferences when it comes to looks, you know, when it comes to even people you want to associate with, like I that's your personal decision.

There's nothing wrong with that.

But the minute you try to elevate that into something political, that's where it becomes a problem.

Because at that point, you are.

Setting herself up as an enemy of America, in the real sense of the word.

You're setting yourself up as an enemy of everything.

The people who built this country sacrificed and died for.

You know?

Why why did we become a United States?

What's the point?

Why not just continue to be colonies of old Europe?

What was the point of this?

You know, think about it.

What was the point of an American Union?

If we're just going to continue to carry the baggage of the old world,

And colonize this land with that baggage.

Well, what's the point then?

Why not just be colonies of the old world?

Well, that's exactly what the far-right tradcaths exactly want.

You know, they say, We want a monarchy, we want a Catholic monarchy in America.

Oh, so you mean like the Habsburgs?

You mean like these actual monarch monarchical lineages that actually exist in Europe and have existed there?

What is American about that?

Explain what's American about that.

These people have an idiotic.

This is what I despise.

They have a notion of civilization and national identity that is based on 19th century.

Anglo-Saxon scientific, scientific racism, literally Reddit science.

So that is supposed to somehow liquidate, you know, the breadth of culture and literature, the spiritual aspect of what unites a people, right?

The thing that actually glues a people together as having a common reality.

All of that is now reduced to biology and to some, not only biology, but an extremely narrow, retarded.

Comprehension of biology in terms of Mendel and Mendelianism, that we have these gene essences that are just immutable and just we're just vessels for DNA to continue to reproduce itself indefinitely.

You're a fucking Reddit-brained retard.

If you are a Mendelian, if you believe in genetics, if you are a racist, scientific racist, you are a fucking retard.

You are no different than Reddit.

You sit here and mock Reddit nihilist for claiming that we're all just made of SARS-STAR stuff and none of this matters.

And you mock Rick and Morty, and yet you're claiming that we exist only to propagate DNA, and that's the only reason organisms exist just to propagate DNA.

You are a Redditor.

You're a Redditor.

If you blindly reject Lysenko without even investigating the matter, without even having an open mind about doing the research yourself, you are a Redditor.

I don't care how based you think you are.

I don't care how based and right-wing and trad you present yourself aesthetically and all the stupid memes you share.

You're nothing but a fucking Redditor with extra steps.

Excuse my French, but I'm sick of these goddamn Mendeloids.

I'm sick of these goddamn Mendelians.

These Reddit Mendelians mocking us for being Lysenkoists, while they literally have the same metaphysical outlook that Reddit has.

Really?

All these common histories shared by these different civilizations just exist to propagate DNA?

Why don't you go add to your Funko Pop collection?

Okay.

Why don't you go add, in addition to that collection you have, read some fucking books about the history of biology?

How about you do that?

Why don't you add to your Funko Pop collection a Lysenko Funko Pop?

Because I'll tell you what that Funko Pop looks like.

It looks like dynamite, because it's going to blow up your entire world.

You're going to get a Lysenko Funko Pop, and it's just going to detonate and explode.

And you're probably going to die, and you will have deserved it.

Imagine sharing that clip out of context.

Like, people are like, what the fuck is he talking about?

Uh anyway.

Anyway, I'm just joking guys, this is all jokes.

But uh anyway.

Okay.

You know what, here's the thing.

Even if you're not a lysenquist, you s you still have to be open minded.

You still have to admit you don't know it all and maybe there's a point there, even if you're not persuaded.

Like that's a hill I'll die on, definitely, a hundred percent.

See, these right-wingers are like, you're just like a left liberal when your views on race.

No, I am a Lysenkoist Stalinist.

I go that far.

I don't deny human biological reality.

I just insist upon the fact that Mendel got it wrong and therefore your entire coping racialist outlook is bullshit.

And Lysenko was actually right.

Lysenko destroys your world from within.

See, liberals will just say, Mm, racism's bad because it's immoral.

Well, I'll say that it's bad because it's uh not based in science.

How about that?

Because real science is uh Lysenko.

See, they'll just be like, science doesn't agree with it because the science...

No, no, no.

No, Mendelian science does agree with racism.

There's no doubt about that.

Any liberal who's you see, all these geneticist liberals be like, oh, actually, no, no, no.

Genetics is an inherently racist science.

There's no, I mean, yeah, even the right-wing, the far-right people will agree with me on that.

It is.

If we define genetics in terms of this idea that the biological organisms just exist to propagate random mutations of DNA, of course, of course, cannibalism, Malthusianism, and racialism are the correct conclusions.

Why not?

Why not?

If we all just exit, and then some lip tards will be like, well, it's also hard-coded in our DNA to take care of each other.

And that's how I know they're a pedophile, right?

That's how I know because they, and don't make me explain myself because I don't feel like it.

But that's how I know, right?

They're like, well, it's also in our biology to be caring and be moral.

And it's like, yep, that's a pedophile.

That's exactly what they would say.

Because think about it, if you're gonna reduce the fundamental human values if you're gonna reduce the fundamental qualities of what it means to be a human being to random accidents of biology, you're probably diddling kids.

Yo, anonymous, what's up?

These are just retarded communists who haven't realized they are at the back of line for the short bus to Stalinist paradise.

I don't even know what that means, but thanks for the five.

Um

No, no, we are not human beings are not social because of something hardwired in our DNA.

DNA is downstream from sociality.

It's DNA that takes orders from the Hegelian spirit.

Bitch And if you don't like the idealist terms Hegel uses,

Man as a social being is an ontological fact.

That is ontology.

Biology is downstream from that.

Genetics, not real.

DNA is downstream from that.

Okay, our DNA is shaped by history.

Yes.

Yeah, I'm going that far.

History commands our DNA.

Yeah.

What Hegel calls spirit.

You don't have to call it spirit if that upsets you.

You can just call it.

You can just call it uh

a social ontology or something.

It's the same shit, though.

Where does life come from?

If you can't answer that question, shut up.

Shut up about it.

If you don't know where life comes from, how does life emerge from non-life?

It doesn't even emerge.

How does life exist in distinction to non-life?

No one knows that.

You know, people don't even have a clue.

And yet they're making these crazy claims about how we just exist to propagate DNA, which is a small part.

It's a very important part, but it's just one part of what we call the process of biological reproduction, cellular reproduction.

DNA plays an important role, sure.

But reducing everything to DNA, really?

That's ridiculous.

How does anyone believe that?

Because some idiot named Mendel, who is a superstitious metaphysician, and look, I'm not here to knock on Catholics.

But Basla doesn't have to do an Inquisition and torture me on that you know that Spanish Inquisition shit, that the Iron Donkey or whatever, where they literally rip you in half?

Like, don't do that shit to me because, uh

I'm not knocking on Catholicism as a whole, but the biggest L ever taken by Catholicism was Mendel.

Mendel was the biggest disaster of Catholic worse than the Inquisition.

Which probably wasn't even that bad, let's be honest.

Much worse than anything in the history of Catholicism, Mendel was the worst.

The only thing that would ever make me anti-Catholic is Mendel having been a Catholic monk, okay?

Um, we need a pope to basically totally denounce Mendel and excommunicate him and we can go and destroy his grave.

That's what we need, okay?

They killed your people in Spain.

Yeah, but it's war.

War is war.

I mean, I think I'm going to bitch about that.

That's war.

We took it, and then we lost it.

Fair game.

Imagine CNN watching this stream.

It's literally a bunch of jokes.

Holy shit.

Wait, did I talk about killing people?

That was a joke.

If I talked about that.

Yo, for Robbie, what's up?

Thanks for the five.

The guy who came up with the Big Bang, that's.

Yeah, you see.

What's up with Cath.

All right.

I'm not against Catholic priests.

We just need to ban them from science.

That's all.

The Big Bang?

Another fake nonsense, gibber idea was created by a Catholic.

Ban Catholics from science.

They keep just giving us nonsense.

Who's that other guy, Niels Bohr?

Or is that Niels Bohr?

Was he Catholic too?

Because I don't like that guy.

Yeah, the Big Bang is the is fake.

Not real.

Engels was literally right.

You can't have a beginning and no end.

That's just as stupid as having an end with no beginning.

Thomas Aquinas, not a fan of that guy at all.

Yeah.

We need to have uh religious prohibitions on specific

Specific scientific imagine yeah, CNN is probably watching this and they're like, This guy goes on rants about Mendel and Lysenko, but watch uh any right winger wants to debate me on this shit and I'll wipe the floor with them.

Yeah, debate me on Lysenko.

I will wipe the floor with you.

I will literally use you as a mop.

I'll use your head as a mop and sweep the floor with it.

If you believe in genes after being exposed to basic education, you are a fucking moron.

I have no other I have nothing else to tell you.

Right.

Um and it's such an important distinction, you know.

We emphasize

You know, I shouldn't say that.

I should say Mendelian genes.

Because did you know Lysenko?

used the term genetics in a positive way where he was like yeah we do believe in genetics as a science and as a school.

We just reject the metaphysical concept of a gene forwarded by Mendel.

But if we understand genetics as just a general science of heredity, we are all for that.

We're all for exploring that and inquiring into that and developing that and contributing to that.

I'm joking a lot and I'm just kind of being edgy or whatever, but to tell you the truth, Me uh Lysenko was not against genetics per se.

He was just against Mendel's specific Mendel Morganism.

That specific dogmatic concept of genes he was against.

There is a G nerd who's going on for thirty minutes yapping about sources.

He does know his shit.

Do you want me to get him to come on and debate?

He is boring as fuck though.

Uh I have to go in thirty minutes.

That's the issue.

I'm going on R T.

1145, so maybe another day.

Yeah, Ray Pete knew the truth, okay?

It's like, look, if I people are like, you know, we share 98% of our DNA with chimps?

That's how important DNA differences are and I'm like actually that that proves that DNA probably doesn't matter as much as you think it does.

If we share like 99.9% of our DNA with a fucking chimp, my best guess is that DNA probably isn't that important.

Just my best guess though.

It was just Russia Defender.

That guy's an annoying troll.

I don't want to deal with that.

See, every time I get a debater, it's just Russia Defender, one of his alts.

He just comes on.

trolling and I'm just ah, can we get one other guy to debate me?

I genuinely believe that you can have the same DNA.

and turn into a banana under the right conditions.

I believe that.

I actually believe that.

Like, it'd probably take like millions of years.

But it's definitely possible.

Not exactly the same, because it would affect it somewhat.

But uh, probably not that.

Maybe not a banana, probably like uh

Uh I'm not saying g by the way, I'm not saying DNA has no relationship to heredity.

That would be ridiculous.

If that was true, they wouldn't be able to pinpoint who you are with GNA test DNA testing or your family for that matter.

So it does have a relationship with heredity, obviously.

But the question revolves around: are the DNA mutations random?

That's the question.

Does is DNA ordered in the way it is, just randomly?

Is that the result of something random?

Or is it because of a deeper rationality of how the organism functions, how the organism the logic of the biological reproduction of the organism?

That's what heredity is, you know.

Heredity, people are like, Haz, you just believe that heredity doesn't matter, and it's like, you're an idiot.

You think ancient peoples.

had to care about a retarded idea of a gene to understand heredity?

They didn't.

Heredity is self evidently a fundamental fact of nature and also human society.

But that doesn't, that's not because we're inheriting genes, Retard.

I'm not, when you see, can you imagine like Shakespeare and Hamlet and like.

You know, the ghost of that the the gho Hamlet, the ghost of the father comes, Avenge me and it's just a fucking gene or it's just a strand of D N A.

Avenge me I'm a strema compilation of D N A strands.

It's idiotic.

That's not what lineage is.

Learn about Hegel, you fucking moron.

D heredity is about a t a total integration of a specific histor historical lineage.

It's about avenging the uniqueness and authenticity of experiences, of a specific existential relationship between mankind and the world around them.

Right?

One that is irreducibly unique.

You know, biologically we are symptoms.

We are symptoms in the Lacanian sense.

We have to answer for our symptom.

Why are we the way we are?

And no other way.

There's no escaping that logic.

There's no escaping it and just ignoring it.

You you have to answer to the thing that repeats, that comes from the real.

Soviets exiled to scientists were trying to splice humans and chimpanzees based on genetics.

Yeah, that guy was just a pervert.

He was literally just doing bestiality.

I'm just kidding.

I don't even know what that guy was doing.

To be honest, they were doing some pretty funky stuff.

Okay?

If you're injecting women with.

you know, monkey stuff.

I don't know.

That's just kinda

The CPUSA has banned deodorant from the Convention.

I heard about that.

Um, I don't know how to respond to it.

Except uh when we come to power, we're gonna um.

Alright, new rule.

All gorillas doing Takia have to stay the fuck away from me at future events, because apparently you can't wear deodorant.

So I can't be around you.

Uh no, I saw that.

I'm o what was the reason they gave?

Is it because like autistic people are sensitive to it?

Why exactly is deodorant banned?

'Cause I'm sensitive to people who smell like shit.

Is that ableism if they're violating that preference?

Can you explain why they banned the?

I don't know why they did it, though.

Can you explain why?

I heard about that, but why?

Allergies?

You know what?

Go to a fucking doctor.

If you're allergic to deodorant, you're allergic to life itself.

Go

If you're allergic to deodorant, stay home and go on Zoom.

That's like saying I'm allergic to other people.

You know what?

You know what?

There's that pisses me the fuck off.

There's literally probably one fucking guy in the CPUSA.

One guy who's allergic to it.

So everybody...

No, that guy needs to sacrifice.

Just like Stalin said, where's your Bolshevik manhood?

What?

You're right and everyone else is wrong?

The majority must prevail.

There's one fucking guy allergic to deodorant, so we all must suffer?

No, you stay home.

You're the black sheep.

You're the odd one out.

The majority will not bow to the minority.

That's Menshevism and it's also smelly.

Like when they banned peanut butter sandwiches at school.

Ah.

But this is way worse because there's one guy in the CPUSA who's allergic to deodorant, so no one can use it?

No, you stay home.

You stay home.

And you do it through Zoom, you inconsiderate asshole.

We all have to smell bad f and sacrifice for you?

Where's the logic in that?

The majority must prevail, not the minority.

Smelly Menshevism Some stanky Menshevism is here.

Some stanky, stanky Menshevism.

I am allergic to peanuts, and they put me at the nut free table.

Which was also the handicap table.

That's what you deserve.

You deserve that, you fucking weirdo.

Why are you allergic to peanuts?

Jesus.

No, I'm kidding.

I don't know.

Honestly peanut butter sounds so good right now.

I might I don't have bread.

I have peanut butter.

I just don't have bread.

I should order some bread.

Yeah, I gotta do an R T interview in like twenty minutes.

But I it sounds so g you just reminded me of something.

Peanuts got pooped.

That's why I don't fuck with Ray Pete fully because it's like he's like, Yeah, you can't have peanut butter anymore.

And I'm like, you know, whatever, dude.

I'll just like die then.

I don't really care.

Like, it's not even worth it at that point.

Crunchy.

Oh, we got a fat ass in the room.

I didn't, I wasn't talking about all that.

Okay, the crunchy kind, taking things a little far.

Okay, I have the natural organic one that's not even sugar.

There's no sugar, nothing.

You're talking about.

Some extremely extra shit.

Okay, people want me to react to stuff.

Let's see.

Mm.

Show requests

The new Black Ops Six.

I I watched it without I I can't watch it 'cause I already watched it, but we'll see.

Uh yeah.

Yeah.

Guys, I'm not gonna lie to you, it's kinda dead in terms of news.

Besides, uh, I'm sure you're all aware, because I hope I have an informed audience that uh

The Zionists are carrying out a massacre in Ruffo right now.

I don't know what else I could say about that, though.

I look really good.

It's the first time I saw myself.

How many?

I saw that.

I saw that.

Hamenai tells the protesters.

Pretty based.

Um

Thought my thoughts on One Piece, what are your thoughts on Five Piece?

'Cause that's what you're gonna become after you're cut in five pieces for telling me about that stupid shit.

I'm just kidding, holy shit.

The only reason I'll I'll give uh I'll cut One Piece some slack is 'cause Logo vouches for it, and I'm not even kidding.

Huzz, you're gonna do you're gonna drop your anti-anime thing just 'cause yeah, Logo is someone whose judgment I actually trust.

On almost everything.

And, you know, honestly, like, when we're talking about anime, we're just like, is it so much for me to ask that if you're a grown ass man, you don't like have a profile picture of like some five-year-old girl, five-year-old anime girl that's sexualized?

We had to overcorrect because of how degenerate anime fans are.

Like, can is it so much to ask that you don't like share like cartoon pornography?

That's pedophilic?

Is it so much to ask that you don't have a body pillow of some like anime girl and be a cringe weirdo?

Yes, we had to overcorrect.

I'm not even saying anime is like all bad.

Okay, Dragon Ball Z is like great.

All young people in the world love it, but I'm like.

Damn, is it so much to ask to just be fucking normal?

Yeah, it is so much to ask.

So we have to be so extreme on this issue because of like how f like who is that guy that literally wanted to write a thread exposing Jackson for being CIA who agreed with Jackson about everything on Russia and all this stuff but like totally lost their mind because Jackson made a tweet saying anime's for pedos.

And that guy is like, You know what?

I'm gonna destroy Jackson now.

He's he has to die.

I'm gonna kill him.

I'm gonna write a thread about him.

All of a sudden, I just realized he's a Fed 'cause he said that.

Uh, yeah, Khamin I said, Dear university students, my advice to you is to become familiar with the Quran.

Kind of based, pretty based.

I agree.

That's such a great thing to say.

Because it also contains all the criticisms we could possibly have of them.

Just read the Quran.

That's it.

No issue.

Just read the Quran.

There's no issue after that.

That's all you gotta do.

Yeah.

Um

Wow, this guy has uh Polaroid photos of me.

And these are pretty cool.

Yeah.

Oza was many times and I can confirm that deodorants and perfumes were banned because one old guard member is sensitive to scents.

Oh, never mind.

It's based now.

'Cause if it's an old guard member, uh then it's pretty much like a dictatorship where he's like he's got like these small preferences he forces on everyone.

Never mind, that's based.

Anyway, uh no, a gorilla posted we we took a photo together.

I could show it on stream.

It's on my for you.

Um

Polaroids.

I remember that.

He was like, can we take a picture with this camera?

And I was like, yeah.

And this looks so cool.

It looks like, you know what this looks like?

It looks like we're.

were drug traffickers in nineteen ninety three in South America.

And we're both like that's what it looks like.

It looks like we're both like uh

In the cartel in 1993.

Super cool.

This actu we look like we're literally part of uh the PLO when they were hijacking planes.

That's what we look like.

We actually look like terrorists from nineteen eighty seven.

You remember when terrorists were based, like in the seventies and eighties?

when it wasn't about religious fundamentalism, but it was just like cool guys with sunglasses who just like hijacked airplanes and did all robbed banks and stuff and they were communists and that's what we look like here.

We look like that.

Watch CNN be like Haz Aldeen endorses terror terrorism.

First, should be my profile pick.

I don't look that good in this, dude.

Come on.

I don't look that good in this.

I like these a lot.

This makes me look like I'm like a time traveler.

This makes me look like I've been around for a long time.

Uh 'cause I have actually.

I have.

I love these.

I'm gonna like it.

I love it so much.

Love it.

Yeah guys, there's really not much going on.

Hmm.

Take off my hat.

Sure.

Don't miss our teacher.

Let me double check exactly when that is.

I think we have some time.

Uh it's gonna be at

1145.

But I have to use the bathroom, so we probably should wrap it up.

Probably should wrap it up.

Tomorrow, I'm going live.

We're resuming regular scheduling, so I'm going live tomorrow.

But I wanted to go live today.

Day.

Interesting things on my TL.

Anyway, uh

I used to be anti-Israel, this is why I changed my mind.

I think it was a view that I was supposed to have as a black woman.

When I was a social justice warrior, I viewed everything through this oppressed, oppressed

Yo, with the 25, what the fuck?

Holy shit.

Alte.

Alte with the 25.

Let's go.

Wasn't even expecting that.

Holy shit, that was a surprise bomb in a great way.

What's up, Alte?

How you doing, man?

Uh what should we do about the bigoted Israel?

What?

Uh bought farms in India.

Ah.

Yeah, I don't know what to do about that.

I have no idea.

You they they win.

You know, here's you know what?

I'm not you know what I think?

India should nationalize its own social media.

Just because we speak English doesn't mean we need to be on the same platforms.

We really don't.

A lot of cultural misunderstandings.

Uh yeah.

India should have its own great firewall of China.

And then we'll bring and then we should bring ch you know what we should do?

I'm just kidding.

How about this?

America, Russia, and China have one social media.

No one else is allowed in.

Unless you become a communist state, then you're allowed in.

We need to build a unit.

This is the end goal.

The end goal is a international communist state exclusive internet.

You don't have to be communist.

You just have to be like bricks aligned.

You have to be multipolar.

And if you're like some Libtar bitch country like Latvia, you are f you're you're nuked.

You're not even banned you're not just gonna be banned from being on our internet.

We're gonna send a nuke

Multiple nukes.

Not just one, multiple.

Uh, that's a joke, CNN.

Sorry.

I, you know, is it a joke though?

Like, you know, like, I'm kind of fucking sick of these people.

Like, I'm not gonna lie.

I'm sick of seeing them.

I'm from Latvia.

Nobody gives a shit.

I'm from Estonia.

I'm from Estonia.

Did you forget to ask me, a guy from Estonia?

Oh, I didn't forget.

I didn't forget.

Didn't it wouldn't even cross my mind.

If the Baltics don't get their shit together, I'm straight up all for nuking them.

Like I mean that.

You better get your stuff get your shit together.

Like I'm really my patience is up to here.

Really getting sick of these people.

Um I definitely think it's a good start to ban them from the internet.

And do a total blackout EMP, but probably won't be enough.

But you know something, you know.

Ah, I don't wanna say this 'cause it's kind of crass of me to say.

But

You know, the women from those countries, I don't know, man.

They're kind of fine.

I don't know.

It's kind of bad for me to say that.

It's unprofessional, but.

That's the only thing they have going for 'em.

And and if you know if you know, you know.

Like it's straight up true.

It's so strange.

Like, that's the one thing they got going for them.

Um, India's right wingers cold post that India did socialism under Nehru and that's why it's poor.

Yeah, well those people think that me and Rev are literally the same guy, so I don't know how you reason with them at all.

I could still be on Twitch if I said in-game.

No, I mean in real life about the Baltics nuking them.

I mean that.

John Jackman, what's going on, man?

I appreciate you.

Yo, what up?

Your credit score has decreased by one million.

Your onion slop credits have been frozen until further notice.

Oh no!

Not the onion slop.

Anyway, let's listen to this.

Uh

Brilliant person.

And entire demographics would be given one of these two labels, and I never questioned why.

I was told that Israel was a racist apartheid state that was oppressing the brown Palestinians that lived there, and that all of this who said that?

Who who made this about skin color?

Not me.

Who made this about skin colour?

Shut the fuck up.

That's just like some dumb American shit.

It's not about skin color.

Like that's some retarded ass uh American nonsense that they're trying to it's like ain't nobody said that.

Who said that?

Who said this was about skin color?

It's like these people have they've been living in these houses for centuries and some people from, you know, I don't know, Poland or wherever came and just took it from them.

It's like who cares about skin color?

Nobody made it about skin color.

Alright.

Um.

It's really unprofessional for me to rate her, isn't it?

I'm not gonna do that.

That's pretty bad.

Uh Harold, wow, with the five.

What's up?

I gotta get going, guys.

I gotta prepare for this interview.

Uh, anything else?

I'll see you guys tomorrow.

There wasn't a lot of news tonight.

Bye, guys.

See you tomorrow.