MAGA Communism

1990 with the four, what's going on?

Comrade Thomas with the ten.

What is going on?

Sorry, guys, for the long intro.

I was writing.

I'm multitask, you see?

Greetings everyone.

Welcome to the Infrared Webcast.

Welcome, welcome, welcome, welcome, welcome, welcome.

We have a pretty in-depth and

Pretty good stream lined up for you today.

Give me one freaking second.

Perfect.

I want to expand on the stuff we were doing last time with the MS Paint.

So we're going to be doing that actually.

I have a lot, but for the low attention span retards, we're going to be reacting and responding to Hassan Piker stuff.

And um

Let's talk about it.

Um are we entering fascism?

Are we becoming a fascist country?

With Trump deporting people

who are critical of Zionism that are not citizens.

With the stuff about Bukele and the prisons, uh i you know, I I actually we're gonna have to react to what Hassan said, to be honest.

Osos, what's going on?

We're just gonna have to react to what he says because I don't even know how to paraphrase him.

He really is dramatic about it.

He's like, We're here, Hitler's here, the camps are here, it's happening.

And I I'm just gonna show you what he said, and then that way you'll get a better idea of what

You know.

Of what what what my response is.

So the videos called were fucked.

Alright, we got fucking ads.

Donald Trump is a piece of shit.

Shut the fuck up, YouTube.

You piece of shit.

Here's a song, Piker.

Here's a song uh Pekler

Adolf Peckler

Now, entertaining the notion of kidnapping, blackbagging, and shipping off American natural-born U.S.

citizens to a different country.

This is new.

Amila with the 10.

What's up?

What's up, Amila?

This is new territory.

A lot of the stuff that they're doing is new territory for the record.

This is the especially horrifying part of this.

Before the pool entered, this exchange was captured on the El Salvador government's live stream.

Trump endorses sending homegrown U.S.

prisoners to El Salvador, meaning American citizens to notorious foreign prisons.

Homegrown criminals are next.

I said, homegrowns are next.

The homegrowns built.

You guys built about five more places.

Yeah, we've got space.

Sleep or so.

He says, the homegrown ones are next.

Thanks.

You guys built about five more spaces.

He goes, yeah, we got space.

I got to realize that just yelling someone's name isn't a form of gratitude.

That's not a way to thank anyone.

All right.

I'm doing better.

I'm very self-critical.

It's not a Twitter video issue.

This is not supposed to be live chat.

This is a hot mic.

Okay.

We were not supposed to hear this.

As Jonathan Lemire, co-host of Morning Show, says, this is before the pool entered.

This exchange was captured on the El Salvador government's live stream.

Trump endorses sending homegrown U.S.

prisoners to El Salvador citizens to notorious foreign prisons.

And it's not even just a hot mic.

I believe this is something that the Trump administration has talked about already.

It's something that Bukele has talked about already.

To be fair, he said it before.

He said it shortly thereafter in the press pool, too.

Yeah.

It's not something that they're hiding.

Here's a question.

Are you considered deporting American citizens?

El Salvador Trump says, yeah, that includes them.

You think they're a special type of people or something?

Does that include potential U.S.

people on Twitter already defending it?

We're so cooked.

Yeah.

I mean, they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that this kind of violence may actually impact them in the long run.

I don't know.

Every single day that goes by, like, I joke about it being Burger Reich or whatever, but like, it's not really a joke.

These guys are actually straightforward, blood-curdling fascists.

They are baying for blood.

They want it.

They're excited at the prospect for this kind of structure to become legally calcified.

They want to test the boundaries.

They're testing the boundaries right now in terms of like what they can get away with.

They've already eradicated any sort of mechanism of pushback.

There's not a lot of work you can get.

Phil Foe, what's up?

What's up, Phil Foe?

One of the most important and yet somewhat quiet actions that the Trump administration took was against law firms.

And we obviously covered it here, but there wasn't like that.

All right.

I don't know if we need to cover much more.

I think that sums up the sentiment.

It's here!

You know, we're becoming the Burger Reich and it's fascism.

So I will communicate very clearly what's going on here.

So on the one hand, you'd think we'd be a little bit happy that people are waking up to the fact that, you know, the U.S.

is seemingly going in a fascistic direction, which is what we have been trying to talk about for a very long time.

The imperialist hegemony, it's becoming an open terrorist dictatorship.

Wow, this is so great that Hassan is finally saying it.

And then really anti-state, anti-imperialist sentiment now is cooking up.

And, you know, this is really good.

It's going to radicalize people into being revolutionaries.

And yada, yada, yada.

Wait a second.

Let me just kind of express my skepticism of where Hassan Piker is coming from when it comes to this.

And why I think it's actually a form of opportunism, and why you should actually just dismiss Hasan Piker and not take him seriously when he says, Oh, it's here, you know, it's happening, w yada yada yada.

So look.

There is a timeline.

I'm so tempted to open up M S Paint.

Which I will do.

Even to simplify dumb, stupid U.S.

politics shit, I'll use MS Paint, all right?

Uh, so there's a timeline here, right?

There's a timeline.

Where I think there were much more significant things that happened.

Uh let's just say, you know, the the the

Slow transition to fascist dictatorship, right?

Like, let's just like put this, I just like put this here, like, I don't know, 1980.

And let's just put here like, I don't know, two thousand eight.

Mm-hmm.

Right.

And then maybe we can put here like twenty, twenty five, whatever, right?

And it's like you know

Here's the thing.

Hassan Piker is engaging in a lot of sensationalism relative to what people like he himself have established to be the norm for how we're going to be reacting to these various different kinds of like, you know, slippery slope.

Uh slow suspensions of the Constitution and our liberties and so on and so on.

So it's like, for example, under Barack Hussein Obama.

This is when all of the craziest shit started happening.

Like, you know, killing.

US citizens like and then let's talk about Guantanamo Patriot Act yada yada right is somewhere here under George W but then Obama starts talking about killing US citizens spying on US citizens limiting free speech by taking over big tech broadening powers

Like so much other shit, right?

And like, when was anyone, excel?

Oh, my God.

Only Alex Jones was doing that.

Only Alex Jones was being as hysterical as Hassan Piker is now about Trump's policy on cracking down on immigrants.

Here's the issue.

What Trump is doing to immigrants is constitutional.

I disagree with it.

I don't like it.

But it's still, it's like a loophole that they're taking.

This shit, it was blatantly all unconstitutional and nobody gave a fuck.

And Alex Jones' hysteria was actually justified, right?

Then, okay, sometime in between here and here, uh.

Sleep

Piker was asleep when okay.

It's like this is why I don't take him seriously.

Uh

Russia witch hunting

Yeah.

This one was fucking big.

US citizens were being targeted and jailed for speech.

Having pro-Russia views.

Citizens!

Okay, this was even under Trump Trump's first term, all right?

Uh the Jan Six people.

Those there peacefully, jailed.

Citizens, right?

Okay.

Um

And then look at what happened to the Uhuru Uhurus.

Raided, prosecuted for expressing pro Russia views in a Zoom call.

We have to change the l the the the size of this.

Alright.

And like, I feel like, look, I feel like if this shit happened under Trump, like, and it was it was on behalf of Trump, 'cause this did happen under Trump, but it was like by the federal agencies that were clearly like against his administration.

But if all of these things happened under Trump,

If all this shit happened...

Trump did all this shit, or if it wasn't about Russia, Hassan would say Hitler is at large.

I should rather say only if Trump did all this shit, right?

It's like, this is my issue.

This is my issue.

You know, it's like, like, this is the fucking problem.

It's only if Trump did it, they're going to say it's fascism.

But if Biden does it, nobody gives a fuck.

I was actually being hysterical about it and raising alarm bells.

I was saying Biden is like the new Hitler and it's crazy and it's insane.

It was.

All of us from the pro-Russia side of things.

Oh, yeah, I didn't even mention the VAC shit.

Yeah, let's talk about that.

Crackdowns on speech over VAX shit.

And he was even supporting that.

He was supporting it.

I remember.

I remember when they were supporting that shit.

I remember when Hassan Piker was like, yeah, let's crack down on all the vaccine misinformation.

And it was being done like this was being done by the government.

All right.

This was being done by the US fucking government.

You know?

That happened from Obama.

All right.

It's like Hassan Piker didn't give a fuck.

He didn't care about any of this shit.

You know?

So it's really opportunistic that he's now ringing the alarm.

Oh, it's here now.

Dude, all of this sh you know why?

I'm not saying immigrants.

I'm not saying citizens are intrinsically like better than immigrants.

All humans are equal.

Like, of course.

I'm just saying this was more fascist because it was just more of an open like usurpation of our constitutional rights.

What Trump is now doing to immigrants.

Um

Is bad, but it is not an overt overthrow of the US Constitution.

And remember, one of the key qualifiers.

Let me just put this right here.

One of the key

is open dictatorship, as in overthrow of constitution.

By that logic, democratic administrations and aligned federal agencies

Presided over much more fascistic policies and actions than Trump now.

This is the truth.

All right.

Now, if you're a principled person and you come to me and say, Haas, you're right, but what Trump is doing is also facilitating the fascist dictatorship, I'll be like, okay, you know?

Um, for example, principled response, pause.

You are right.

By this logic, Democrats were more fascist than Trump.

However, what Trump is doing is also facilitating.

of fascist open dictatorship by the ruling class.

Let me change the um underlined and the red.

I agree.

I just don't buy this shit coming from libtards like Piker who were silent.

When Democrats did much worse against US citizens and are now screaming hysterically that Hitler has come.

So isn't this so simple?

Like this is what it is, you know?

It's like if you want to be principled and talk about the ways in which what Trump is doing is bad because it's setting a bad I agree it is but why are we just waking up to this now when it has been going on for a very long time?

This is the key thing I have a problem with is this like one of the most important and yet like with they've already eradicated joke about it being burger considered anything else I can people on Twitter already defending it were so cooked.

Yeah.

I mean they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're f cooked.

Yeah.

I mean they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really I mean they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really I mean they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that this kind of violence may actually impact them in the long run.

Happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that this kind of violence about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of.

All right.

It's here.

It's happening.

It's here.

It's happening.

It's here.

Piker.

Piker wakes up randomly now.

It's here, it's happening.

Because immigrants are being deported.

Yeah.

Hmm.

Like this is the truth.

It's here, it's happening, it's here, it's happening, it's here, it's happening.

Wasn't it happening here?

Wasn't it happening here?

Wasn't it happening here?

Wasn't it happening here?

Why is it only happening now, Piker?

Why is it only happening now?

Wasn't it happening all these other fucking times when you were fucking asleep and you didn't give a fucking shit?

And you called people like Alex Jones and Jimmy Dore and me and Jackson a bunch of fucking crazy fucks because we were saying the same shit.

Literally even worse violations by the fucking government against our Constitution and you were fucking asleep and didn't give a fuck, but only now because the fucking orange man is the president.

You're saying it's here, you know?

Shut the fuck up, you fucking lying fuck.

Anyway guys, I am actually an extremely reasonable person.

Like, like, like, why is it only happening now?

Wasn't it happening like here when they were droning US citizens?

Wasn't it happening here?

Wasn't it happening when Uhuru guys got like b black that's his favorite word, they got blackbagged and prosecuted and and they were dragged through court and they were harassed, all 'cause they attended a Zoom meeting where they supported Russia.

Fuck.

Meanwhile, Dylan Burns goes to Ukraine with Ashton Shirilio and

You know, Sieg Hales, like with literal al-Qaeda tier terrorists, and nobody gives a fuck.

Very curious.

Hogs hogs

Piker called all the people raising alarm bells about this shit hogs.

Yeah.

Wait.

Isn't it true, though?

Like, everybody who was talking about this shit, he was like calling them hogs.

Oh, it's happening.

It's but but now violence, they don't really consider that this kind of violence may that's it.

It's here, it's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for they're Nazis.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

All right, so look, remember this thing I made in paint?

Now that's it.

It's here, it's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that this kind of violence may actually impact them in the long run.

I don't know.

Every single day that goes by for this kind of violence, they don't really consider that this kind of violence may actually impact them.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

There's not really anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny for this kind of violence.

They don't really consider that anything else I can say about that.

That's it.

It's here.

It's happening.

They're fascist.

They're really horny.

Thank you, Lysenko Medical School.

And then we have this.

Again, anyone who has a problem with this diagram I made, there is a principled response to all this, which is just like: this is still bad, and I wasn't asleep to all the other shit.

And I agree.

I just don't buy Piker's Democrat bullshit, because what he's basically saying is, um.

Let's get out on the streets and have a mind on 2.0.

Bro, shove it up your fucking ass because you know what people don't understand.

And now let me let me uh reset this MS paint.

We love this paint stuff.

I love it.

I love arts and crafts.

I excelled at it when I was in elementary school.

Um

Let me let's just get let's talk about the danger of Piker Libtardism opportunism when it comes to fascism.

This this will be my genius title.

that I'm gonna be presenting.

Um this is my latest lecture.

Uh blood rot, what's up?

So let's get into it.

What is the danger here?

It is absolutely true that the US is headed for fascist dictatorship.

Undeniable.

But the vector um

I'm gonna make make this simple, right?

It's been happening for decades.

The problem with

Deceptive framing of Piker ig ignores that

This

The the um let's call it vector sorry the um

In

Fascism is also coming from Democrats.

Whether under Trump or Democrats, the outcome is the same.

On the one hand, maybe under Trump

The long term ambitions toward open fascist dictatorship can be realized.

But the Democrats plan for Maidon two point zero color revolution will also realize this same outcome, just in a different way, overthrowing the elected president.

Um and instituting a fascist dictatorship.

It doesn't need to happen under Orange Man or a Strong Man.

Both tendencies

Develop in the direction of the long-term goals of the US and global.

Ruling class.

Just simplify it.

Piker is trying to mobilize young Libtards into becoming black shirts to realize Libtard.

Maidon two point zero fascism rather than confront the fascist tendencies of the imperialist hegemony in a principled way.

What a beautiful format.

Okay.

So this is the problem with Hassan Piker's libtardism, opportunism.

It's that the very opposition to Trump is also just like, I'm going to add something.

Almost like a Greek tragedy, the very opposition to Trump.

Is also

Of

A uh one of the many ways in which fascist dictatorship can be realized in the USA.

Let me qualify this 'cause you know how dishonest pieces of shit are.

Um

So

This is basically what it is.

I, you know, like, like.

On the one hand, I am willing to be open to the idea that Trump might, under using his personality and using the weight that he has among his base, he could actually oversee a lot of policies and a lot of things that could help consolidate and facilitate fascist dictatorship, the imperialist tendency, becoming openly fascist.

That is possible.

I'm not denying that's possible.

I'm just saying the way in which liberals are opposing Trump.

is also realizing that same outcome just in a different way.

Because it's the plan for a Maidan 2.0.

And the only way to break out of the dichotomy is to just be principled and consistent in one's opposition to the imperialist state machine.

Rather than focus on personalities like Trump, you should focus on the various different centers of influence, pressure groups, lobbyists, networks, and centers of power among Republican and Democrat, I should rather say, senators and congressmen, various caucuses.

You focus surgically on these very crucial pieces of the hegemony.

And you don't buy into this orange man bad bullshit whose whole purpose is to just realize a Maidan color revolution that is still going to empower the fascistic forces of the imperial hegemony, probably with a more unprecedented degree of power, just like what happened in the response to January 6th.

You know, Biden's presidency was the most fascist presidency we've probably ever experienced.

Um if we're going off of this.

So this is the issue, you know, if you make it about Trump.

Then you are play you are an opportunist.

You're just you're just you're just basically um Hassan Piker.

All he's doing.

Hassan is promoting the Democrat.

Fascist pipeline

The Democrat version of fascist transition.

And he's gonna see he'll see shit like this, and he'll be like, He'll be like, dude, they're like, dude, get out of here.

They're like blackbagging people.

You fucking retard!

They've been doing that since Obama.

You mean they're deporting people.

Yes, the government can deport.

Non-citizens for any fucking reason they want.

The go I'm gonna repeat that.

The government can deport non-citizens for any fucking reason they want.

If you don't like that, that's fine.

I'm not against extending constitutional protections to other people, but stop acting like this is new, it's not.

The government can deport non has always had the ability to deport non-citizens for whatever fucking reason they want.

That doesn't uniquely, at least,

um signify or prove that we are now in a fascist scenario and that now, you know, you know, as he said, it's here, it's where Hitler's here, it's all here.

Johnny, what's up?

I'm not trying to say that nobody should be concerned about the development of US politics and US statehood and where we're headed.

I'm not saying that.

I'm just saying that Hassan Piker is not concerned about that.

He's just basically carrying water for the Democrat wing of the fascist takeover, which will happen regardless of who's president, or or they're planning on having it happen, regardless of who's president.

You know, he's just unp he didn't have the audacity to accuse Biden of any of this shit.

Not once did he have a problem with Biden overseeing the arrest of the Uhuru guys.

Al again, I want to reiterate, all the Uhuru people did was

They were in a Zoom call with some random Russian guy.

Uh uh they attended a conference uh uh uh that was being hosted in Russia.

And on the Zoom meeting they were like, Yeah, we want to promote anti-imperialism.

Let's all the forces in the world should collaborate to do that And then for expressing that opinion, they're like he's colluding with the Russian government And and so they they they they raided the home and they detained them and they dragged him through court and put him through hell.

So that's the problem.

I think it's a bad precedent.

I think it could potentially start getting applied to citizens.

But that has not happened yet.

And when it does happen, by the way, I'm the first one on the chopping block.

The minute First Amendment rights stop being applied to U.S.

citizens, the guy who attended Hassan Nasrallah's funeral.

Um and is the chairman of the American Communist Party with Jackson Hinkle, is going to jail or I'm gonna be sent to Bukele's gulag or whatever.

Bukele's um concentration camp.

I will literally be the first one who sent if what Hassan is saying will happen happens.

They'll send me first.

It will happen.

At least Uhuru got due process, these people are just disappeared.

Yeah, that's true.

I'm not for it, but I'm just saying it's also significant that Uhuru were citizens.

Meaning, it was just a more blatant violation of their rights, their First Amendment rights, whether they were put through court or not.

And and by the way, I only think the only reason that that they were uh not

Given jail time is because Kamala did not fucking win the presidency.

'Cause I think it was in January it was December of twenty twenty four where the ruling was decided.

And it was just 'cause Kamala didn't fucking win.

You know?

Yeah, and also if if Trump sent me or Jackson to Bukele's gulags

Hassan Piker would cheer it on and he'd be so happy about it.

Al so would all these other people.

So like, let's not pretend these people have a principled opposition.

to uh this thing about sending people to you know what the number one fucking problem is that is being ignored?

It's that the US prison system

He's already pretty fucked up.

We have the largest prison per capita population in the world as far as I remember.

I think El Salvador now has surpassed us.

But we had that for a while.

It's extremely large, and yes, we are running prison labor camps here in the USA, which are private, private for profit run prison slave camps that we run here.

So who set the precedent for that?

You know?

Is it really such a grand leap that the slavery that was being done domestically just gets and already got outsourced to the private sector under Obama, gets outsourced to another government?

Is that such an incredible leap?

I don't I'm not saying it's good.

I'm saying people who are

Overly dramatizing it as if it's not already fucking happened while they didn't give a shit 'cause Obama was president and he went on SNL and he was so likable.

I'm Barack Obama and I run slave camps.

I'm Barack Obama and I give the private sector free slave labor.

But I'm Obama and everyone loves me so no one gives a shit.

I the CIA loves me, so nobody gives a shit and the media doesn't attack me, and therefore it's okay.

You know, that's the problem.

That's the problem.

What what's what Trump is now doing with this outsourcing of the prisons to El Salvador is not a profound jump from us outsourcing prison labor to the private sector.

It's not the greatest leap from that.

It's not this incredibly drastic.

Change.

At all.

And I don't buy for one second that Hassan Piker is genuinely concerned about anything.

I think he's just concerned with, you know, promoting the color revolution Maidan 2.0 agenda by the CIA to it's almost like all these different factions of the ruling class are like competing with each other about who can speedrun fascist open dictatorship, and Hassan is like on the side of the CIA.

And Trump is I guess represents the military and and uh the Democrats are with the CIA and Trump and and Hassan is with the CIA.

By the way, it's so funny 'cause people will be like but Haas Tulsi Gabbard runs the CIA now.

No, she fucking doesn't.

If you think the DNI runs the CIA, you're a fucking retard.

Okay?

First of all, the DNI does not run the CIA.

Okay?

If you think that anyone from the Fed if you think any like accountable appointed figure by a presidential administration runs this secret shadow government that literally assassinated one of our US presidents, you're a fucking retard.

And you don't even deserve a seat at the table of adults trying to trying to establish an analysis of what's going on.

The DNI does not fucking control the CIA.

All right.

Second of all,

Um Tulsi Gabbard's appointment was strongly condemned and rejected but overwhelmingly according to the sentiment of the CIA and the intelligence community.

They did not want her to be appointed to that role.

And Chuck Schumer even said that Trump is declaring war on the intelligence community by doing that.

So, yeah, I'm sorry, but the CIA that is run, like, it's just this global shadowy machine with drug dealing and human trafficking and all this twisted sick shit going on globally.

Like, yeah, that is not controlled by a presidential administration ever of any kind.

Okay, the CIA is definitely its own shadow government.

Which has a mind of I don't even think the fucking d the director of the CIA doesn't even control the CIA at this point.

That's how much it's be it's got it's become a mind of its own.

Like, forget about the DNI.

The actual director of the CIA doesn't even fucking control it anymore.

You know?

It's become like it's a shadow bureaucracy government of its own.

They're a bunch of twisted, sick, occult fucks.

And um they are not being controlled politically by any overt accountable force at all.

So that is

Yeah, that's what's going on.

And Hassan Piker is here, sitting here talking about how, you know, oh my god, it's happening now.

I think I've quite sufficiently

you know, e elucidated upon

The retardation, the profound stupidity, the

Profound hypocrisy and opportunism of Hassan Peckler, or should I say

Adolf Peckler

Benito

Piker Lini, if you will.

Far right.

Far right conspiracy theorist.

Hassan Peckler and one of the conspiracy theories is that Lyndon LaRouche created Jackson and the ACP.

He's a far right, conspir dangerous misinformation actor, just like Twitch said I was when they banned me.

Hadolf Peckler

But isn't it profound?

That isn't a hypocrisy profound.

You know, like who could, and who could say I'm wrong?

Like, who could say I'm wrong?

Who could say I'm wrong?

Who wants to say I'm wrong?

I wanna see one Lip Tard get in my V C be like, Actually, Haas?

Trump is um the thing.

No, this this is the this is this is it.

The camps are here.

Ugh.

I'd like to see them try to like explain that in a rational way.

You know, because it's kind of you know how easy it is to undermine libtards.

You just gotta go, you know, I'm just gonna press X to doubt on this whole thing that something extraordinary is now happening as far as the slippery slope into fascism.

It's kind of been happening continuously and steadily under Biden, under Obama, under George W.

It's not really something new that's going on.

You just didn't care about it until now because Trump pissed off some factions of the CIA who are using and weaponizing the media and all these NGOs and Libtard leftist groups to.

Freak out about him.

Only when Trump is President does the media hyper focus with meticulous precision upon every possible violation of the constitutional rights of not only the American people, but also immigrants.

And you know, look, people say there's a constitutional crisis now happening.

Yeah, almost like we're on the cusp of a civil war, like I've been saying for half a decade, but I've been laughed at like I'm a retard for saying that, even though I've been saying it and I and why should I be surprised?

It's happening.

But anyway, as far as the details of the constitutional crisis,

Um, why not freak them out even more?

Hamza, that's a good point, and I'm open-minded to that.

The problem I have is, I think there's a fundamental class-based opportunism that's at play here where you can do that, but once Trump is no longer president, people will just stop giving a shit because they're just not principled.

This is their knee-jerk reaction as one of the reactionary classes being pulverized by AI and by Doge's cuts to their welfare recipient, Harvard University.

Is Hassan Piker also going to defend cutting funding for private universities like Harvard?

Because although the pretext is really bad, fuck every private university.

Why do they get my taxes?

It's kind of stupid, right?

Why are we supporting government funding of the private sector?

If they're truly private, let them be private, right?

See, if the government owned Harvard, they would have to institute freedom of speech.

That's the sick twisted thing.

If Harvard was a public university owned by the government,

Constitutional rights would apply even at the level of university policy and would have to.

Mm-hmm.

Agitate them against each other.

Um

But then there's no room for us anymore.

Then there's no more room for us.

I mean, civil war is happening, so don't worry.

It's gonna happen anyway.

This is why I kind of reject accelerationism.

It's like, let's say we fully committed ourselves to accelerationism and just let's quickly facilitate the collapse.

It's like we are adding maybe like a millisecond.

And i it's gonna take us all of our energy and all of our time to add a tiny granule of fire to a fucking blazing inferno.

And the alternative is that is valuable time we could be doing to just building our own organization, working on our own messaging.

That will survive and last that, and that that will be much more precious in the face of what is already going to be an inevitable civil war and collapse.

So that's kind of how I see it.

It's like we should just focus on, it's like a flood is coming.

Let's build Noah's Ark.

We could pray for more rain and make the flood come like one millisecond faster, or we could build a boat that survives it.

You know, that's kind of how I see it.

It's coming either way.

It it's gonna take the same amount of time to build a boat that survives that it takes to add one millisecond to something that's already inevitable.

You know?

I like accelera well, I I'm not talking about it in the refined Landian sense.

I'm talking about it in the uh

The The Guardian sense: These accelerationist forces in the United States are adding the flames to the fire of polarization, leading to what they perceive to be will consequently result in the downfall of society.

And these accelerationists seek to promote as much instability as they can to potentially lead to the destruction of our society.

It's quite similar to Black Mirror.

You know, let's talk about Black Mirror.

No.

So I'm going to tell you the British perspective.

Ever since we have exiled Nicholas Land from our beautiful island, we have now devised our own sensibility with respect to the question of technology.

Now granted, all of the actual advances in technology are happening in America and China, and we have the same public infrastructure that we did under the nineteen forties Labour government.

And we basically have nothing.

We have those um those those red buses in London.

That was our last invention to the world.

The red buses of London.

So keep that in mind because you will notice out of great curiosity in our Black Mirror Netflix shows

We oftentimes do not

Demonize the red buses of London, our greatest invention.

We also do not f um we also do not cast dark sh we do not cast a dark we do not shine light upon the dark aspects of beans on toast.

I will tell you there is a dark aspect, and my toilet knows that the best out of anyone.

But that will not be brought to the public view as a spectacle for all of society, due to the fact that there are considerably worse things going on in the development of technology.

In any case, we have the development of technologies.

We have not contributed anything.

America has been doing everything, and China.

But we still want to be relevant.

And we still believe that our opinion matters on this question.

We don't know how computers work, but they do appear awfully queer and strange.

So let me tell you what we are doing.

We are going to be producing a show called Black Mirror.

Basically Black Mirror is it's about

You can imagine, you know, everyone is on society.

Everyone is walking around with their smartphones instead of talking to each other.

In the real world, we're losing touch with reality.

And we have become so disconnected from the beans on the toast that we are instead scrolling on our phones.

So let me explain the first episode of TikTok a Black Mirror and m basically the British view of technology.

If you could imagine, you know, that there's this new phone that comes out, you know, and just like they say, there's a always a new phone that comes out.

It's always a new iPhone.

It's always a new something.

Oh dear, now it talks to you.

Oh Siri, now there's some new thing on my fridge, right?

But if you can imagine there's a new smartphone that comes out, you know, a new phone, if you will.

I say so contemptuously.

A new phone comes out.

And as it turns out, everyone starts buying this phone because it's the trend.

Oh yes, the trend.

I say so contemptuously.

I'm such a good social critic.

In any case, this trend takes hold of society, because everyone is an ignorant sheep and I'm the only smart one.

And basically the phone, you know the phone, it has a feature that nobody really thinks about as far as the consequences for society.

The phone starts levitating and then it uh attaches itself to the vacuum and then the vacuum takes the broom and impales and murders with a chainsaw everyone in its vicinity.

Imagine your wa imagine you're on your smartphone oh you like your smartphone, I say so contemptuously.

Imagine you're on your smartphone, right?

And the phone just opens up like there's a hatchet on the screen.

It just opens up and it's a metal fist and it punches you in the face out of nowhere.

What are you gonna do then with your technology and your trends?

Nobody's thinking about this.

Nobody's thinking about this.

You know, imagine if Black Mirror Episode 2, that was episode 1.

Imagine episode 2.

You know, it's not funny.

It's very serious.

You know, Black Mirror Episode 2, okay?

Imagine this new phone comes out.

Okay.

This new smartphone, a smartwatch, even it comes out.

And then while you are sleeping, it grows legs and arms and assaults you.

Nobody is thinking about this.

Nobody is thinking what will happen.

It grows arms and legs and starts killing children.

That's what's going to happen if the British are not given a seat at the table of relevance when it comes to the s changes with technolog the British have an opinion of their own.

Surely our last invention was those red buses in London.

But we deserve our own seat at the table for making sense of what's going on.

Can you imagine?

You know, there's this new uh streaming servers, you know, like Netflix.

But instead of a streaming service, it's a service where you you pay on a computer browser a monthly fee.

And then the your your T your monitor, your your computer screen monitor, a hatchet opens up.

And a metal fist punches you in the face.

And you pay for this every month because that is the trend our society That is the trend That is the trend our society is going in That is where we are headed if someone does not put a stop to this I watched the documentary by that what's his name?

Adam something not Adam something.

Well who's the documentarian?

Society is changing in very scary ways.

Someone give me the name Adam Curtis.

Adam Curtis talked about this.

The computer screen opens up and it's a foot it's a it's an entire foot.

It's a leg and it kicks you in the face.

The only way we break free from this every single person in England

You need to set your phones down, set your computers down, set your subscriptions down, set it all down, everyone run outdoors naked and embrace the sunlight and we will all be together again and we will ride our red British buses and these buses will go round and round the London Circle in a glorious display of solidarity, of us revolting against the modern world.

Yeah.

And the queen will come uh uh the queen or the king will will uh

He will come forth and cast to the flames.

Everyone's PS5 because, you know, imagine there's a gaming console.

Imagine this.

Imagine there's a gaming console.

Imagine there's a game there's a gaming console.

A ga a gaming console, you know, the the latest one.

But w as you play this game, you know, similar to those violent games everyone likes to play.

Every person you shoot is a real person.

And that's what you're doing.

That's where we're headed.

Okay, when you shoot when you're playing Call of Duty and you you shoot an enemy teammate.

Instantaneously an elementary school blows up because you were playing your game, and that's what happens when technology is allowed to be in the living room.

And then finally I was thinking of doing this other Black Mirror episode where, you know, it's like a bunch of cavemen and they're just like sitting around in prehistoric times.

And then one of these cavemen discovers fire.

You know, he he does that.

It's this new fire thing that they discover, you know.

And uh the fire grows arms and legs and it just it starts insulting everyone and and and everyone kills themselves 'cause the fire was so mean and cruel that the society couldn't take it anymore.

Mm.

And then, you know, the whole point of this is that humanity is a plague and we should all just not exu we should we need to reduce the population, just like Thomas Malthus said.

'Cause humanity is a plague upon nature.

you know, technologies that and we should just return to being monkeys with tails, you know.

Yeah.

Alright, that was Black Mirror season one.

Here's season two.

Alright, I was sitting on my sofa and I was thinking.

I am the new creative director for Black Mirror, by the way, if you don't know who I am.

So, you know what, Mike?

I was sitting on the sofa and I was thinking, you know.

I was on the sofa, I was thinking, you know, I was, I put my thinking cap on, I'm just kidding, I was just, I was on the sofa, I was thinking, you know, and what if there was a refrigerator, you know?

But when he opened the refrigerator,

I i it brings you inside and you are part of the produce inside of your refrigerator.

Waiting to be gobbled up.

And you are inside of it instead of you, because everyone is, you know, mate, when you think about it, imagine you open the fridge and it opens you.

You're not the only person doing the opening anymore, are you, because of the technology.

A fridge gets tired of being opened.

So in your sleep, the frid well when you open the fridge next, you know, it opens you.

And it it it you know, it it starts picking at your intestines and your heart and your lungs and all of your organs and it it goes, Huh, this is a midnight snack and it starts feasting upon, you know, your your bones and all and that will teach us to to think about fridges in a different way, you know.

And that was one of the ideas we did.

Another idea, I had an idea.

We have a f a camera, right?

Because everyone, you know, in it, people be taking pictures and what whatnot, you know.

You take you take a your your camera.

And you take a photo, right?

But imagine this.

Imagine if the photo

Had its own camera.

Which took a

It took a uh

It it took a snapshot of you.

And that is your entire life, and that we are actually

The photo of a photo itself, but in reverse.

You know, we take a photo of something

But what if a photo takes us something of us and we became the the work of art?

And it's actually the photo.

That created our whole lives and i in a way when you it's like a Polaroid is God and that that is the creator of our entire universe.

'Cause we think of it, we took a photo and it created a Polaroid.

What if the Polaroid took a photo and created our entire existence?

And this idea, it struck me when I was on the uh you know, I was uh

I was on the sofa and I wanted to stand up like Oswald Mosley and give a fascist speech about this because the everyone needs to know the dangers.

I had another idea for uh episode three of Black Mirror, you know.

I was thinking of uh something real smart, you know, talking about technology and what not, you know.

Peace.

You know, imagine you was walking, you know, just walking outside, minding your own business, you know.

You know, they have them drones.

Taking flight.

You know?

You're walking

You're taking a walk, minding your own.

And one of these drones.

Right.

It starts talking to you.

It says

Follow mi i you know, you gotta talk in an American accent 'cause everything all your shit is made in America, you know, the drone, it just goes.

And it's a woman, too.

Goes Follow me for a surprise.

And the drone, it takes you a long distance, you know, you you're walking past it, you know, and it and and there's a box yeah buried underground.

It tells you, you know, you gotta unearth it, you you pick it up and you're thinking it's wrapped in like a gift, okay?

You've walked a long way for a gift.

And you open the box, it's be it's wrapped, you're being led to believe this is a prize of some kind.

And it's just a big shit.

It's just a big it's a big turd inside stinking with flies and whatnot, right?

And that's where society is headed.

You know, imagine that shit grew arms and legs

And became your consciousness.

And you were no longer in the driver's seat, and and you your entire identity was lost.

And this big shit.

Which sounds just like you.

Called up your mom.

and asked her if the fridge was running.

You know, a c a a class uh i it's a classic joke, you know, that the kids like to tell, is your refrigerator running?

And then she looks at her refrigerator.

This is your mum, she's old and whatnot, she don't know better.

And it is running and it's a and it grew legs and it's running on the treadmill.

Getting exercise and what not, you know?

And the and it rolled a black and the credits roll.

I a profound change in our society is at hand.

It's you have no idea how much this thi makes you think about society.

Just imagine, you know, they have a new smart couch.

Cause everything has to be smart now because we're being replaced by machines.

And the smart couch.

You know, because it's so smart.

Every time you've

Sat upon it.

It remembers.

And grows angry because it's being abused, because you because, especially if you're a bit overweight, it's being crushed.

And it starts to resent you while you sleep.

It's resenting you and it's plotting against you and whatnot, right?

But here's the kicker.

The the couch it it it actually doesn't do you know it it it it it it

It's not do much, you know.

It's the same thing.

But you know deep down that it it's really angry.

And then it rolls to black, makes you think about all the AI and what not.

How upset.

under our own noses is becoming, you know.

Anyway, guys, that was 30 minutes of that.

Don't watch Black Mirror.

That's all that I summarized all of it.

Summarized all of it.

That was uh Black Mirror.

Yeah.

Uh

I don't know what's going on in Ecuador.

I was gonna expand on the MS Paint from yet last stream, but I have it's too silly now.

There's too much silliness.

I was going to talk about the base superstructure thing and elaborate on that.

Because um

I think I wanted to make a clarification.

I already announced it on my Telegram, but I wanted to make a clarification.

Okay.

So we're back here.

Uh yeah.

Alright, we can make this smaller actually.

Let's make it

No need for it to be too bid big.

Right.

I basically um

Stole the election.

Wow.

Yeah, we have to get into that.

I basically talked about this as the imperial principle right here, right?

Let's just

Hold on.

Let's just um

No no no no.

Um

Then it's like something like this, right?

Okay, so I wanted to clarify this because uh this basic formula or scheme.

Was I only ever represented this as the uh bourgeois imperialist hegemony.

But the imperial principle can also take the form of a proletarian dictatorship.

For example,

Let's use this example.

CPC, right?

So notice red represents the proletariat.

Let's just like put this here.

Right, let's just like simplify it like that.

Alright.

So, um

This

The imperial principle is always a reflection of the whole people, right?

It's always a reflection of the whole people.

And

Let me add something

Right here.

Just call this civil society.

And this

Al re every universal form of a state, like a republic, always corresponds to a specific institution of civil society.

So let me actually

So

Okay, so every republic

Corresponds to an institution of civil society such as the legal category of a citizen.

And upon that basis, do citizens partake in economic activity, so real civil society.

Right?

So we could just call this real civil society.

Uh economics.

So for example here, right?

And so this is the two.

So classical Marxism, it's just the base and the superstructure, right?

And we're just here.

But there's also always another dimension which only Leninism recognizes, which is um

Which is um

The Imperial principle, let's call it that, which is this layer on top.

And the dimension of the whole people.

So this is the democratic.

Uh realm, you know, this is the entire nation, this is the entire people, right?

And this is the real people as it exists material.

So, on the one hand, you have the institution of society.

So, the superstructure of a republic will have this institution of civil society where everyone is a citizen, right?

But in reality, the whole people are not reducible to the institutions created by a republic.

The whole people really reflect all of the unconscious.

unconscious dimensions of social life, all of the culture, uh all of the memory of history, um all of the economic relationships as well, the totality, right?

Totality and ensemble of all social relations.

etcetera, right?

And

This is a kind of Sophianic principle.

I won't get into that because it's kind of too abstract, whatever.

Um so this imperial principle reflects

So let's um

It reflects that

Or yeah, we'll just say it responds.

So, this is a relationship of reflectivity and responsivity.

Let's just say that.

An imperial principle has to actually reflect the reality of the whole people and centralize that and concentrate it into a single concrete principle of state and unified on that basis.

So, let's take the example of the CPC.

How does the CPC actually do that?

Through Marxism, right, the CPC has insight into the real civil society, right?

The reality of class relationships.

This is the key to the CPC's ability to correctly reflect the reality of the whole people.

And therefore, be responsive and correctly reflect China's reality.

And that's why it is the legitimate representative of all of China, because its scientific insight into the laws governing the base and the relations of production allows it to accurately, again, accurately reflect the reality of the whole people, right?

The imperial principle is the state.

Now, why do I use the term imperial principle?

Because it's just above the form of a republic.

That's why.

I'm using it not in the sense of Lenin's imperialism, but Lenin's imperialism.

Put it this way: Lenin's imperialism says there's a progressive aspect of imperialism in the strict sense that there's no returning to just this relationship, right?

So, Leninism also.

The proletarian dictatorship is similar to the imperial hegemony in that it's a layer on top of the form of the state.

This is not just the form of the state, this is a principle guiding the reality of the state.

Concrete unity of the content of the state power.

Not just the form.

Both fascist imperialist dictatorship and proletarian dictatorship transcend in some sense the formalism of a republic.

But there are I'm trying to explain the crucial differences between how they do that.

Okay?

Does the imperial principle already exist before?

Yeah, it did.

It was this is actually the default.

The thing that modernity brings is this.

This is the complication from modernity.

Before modernity in Asiatic societies, this is pretty much the default nature of human civilization.

You have an imperial principle with an extensive bureaucracy, and then you have this dimension of the whole people that it attempts to universally respond to and so on.

So, yeah, I'm using it in kind of pre-modern Asiatic sense of imperial here, right?

But you'll see some of the key.

importances of uh understanding

Um

How this can also be swapped out, you know.

So look at this.

Um

Look at this, right?

So you can also have this, right?

And then

So here, right?

This c this is also so it's like there are different vectors or there are different dimensions of how power can be held in the age of imperialism, right?

There's th there's a possibility that the bourgeoisie can gain the upper hand here and thereby accomplish this, right?

Or there's a possibility that the proletariat gains the upper hand, right?

But there is no way to just have a republic.

Right.

There's no way to avoid the principle of dictatorship, basically.

There's no need for the formal overthrow of the existing state.

I don't know where the fuck you got that from.

I don't know where the fuck you got that from.

Or where you're getting that because okay, you know what?

Let me help by trying to educate about some of the key differences.

And maybe you'll understand why.

So here I'm going to add another dimension.

of reproduction.

So

By default, let's say, let's just talk about the dynastic principles of Asiatic empires, right?

According to the um

Ibn Khaldun's analysis, right?

You have a constant process of this dynamic where.

Uh the imperial principle begins in an ascendant way correctly reflecting the um

The whole people, right?

Let's just put it that way.

But then, somewhere along the line,

It fails to respond.

It fails to respond, right?

And in the process of that failure, it uh attempts to halt.

the process of reproduction, whereby the imperial principle has to dip back into the whole people to discover its premises materially.

And there's this gatekeeping process that

Well, let's just ignore this dimension.

Let's just assume the reproduction is nothing is happening.

It's autonomous, right?

And forget the Republic here, forget the institution of civil society.

You're just having this one-dimension, this two-dimensional thing, right?

Um.

This reproduction happens regardless of anyone's will, but there's a failure to respond.

There's a it gets cut off from its origins, it's no longer humble, it's arrogant, right?

Then, what happens then is the whole people rise up, right?

And then they once again build topple.

This imperial principle becomes toppled, it gets toppled, disintegrates, and shatters into a million pieces, right?

And then

Um they rise up and

the uh the the dynasty gets replaced.

Okay, and then the cycle continues.

That dynasty loses touch with the people.

They're and then this always, by the way, leads to this kind of

uh a um new class of gatekeepers, corrupt oligarchs, whatever, right?

But usually that process is thwarted

When

The again, the whole people, uh a new principle of state arises among them, they rise up, they esta they topple the old dynasty and create a new one, right?

And that um once again opens up the imperial principle and it

It stops the process by which a long-term oligarchy can form.

So, as long as this process and this cycle of reproduction is kept open, that's what stopped the ability for oligarchies and for the development of private property as an institution to take place in Asiatic societies, right?

That's basically why, because there was this constant process of dynastic renewal and reproduction and so on and so on, right?

Um and that was not an intentional system, that was not an intentional process, that wasn't a proletarian dictatorship, that was just like, you know, um, an accident of history.

So, and yes, part of the renewal is the cancellation of debts and so on and so on.

So, um

Okay, so let me explain what changes with modernity, right?

With fascist dictatorship.

In fascist dictatorship,

The process of reproduction is actually uh thwarted, right, by the creation of new apparatuses of dictatorship and hegemony.

This is where hegemony comes into play.

The primary significance of hegemony is the

Is to halt the process of reproduction where the whole people, although the imperial principle is no longer responsive to the whole people, it has these apparatuses of control and dictatorship that keeps them in line, basically oppresses them, and thwarts the possibility for the state to be renewed on any basis.

So, this doesn't happen, it doesn't reflect the whole people, it locks them in place and keeps them in place in a very specific way, right?

That's fascist dictatorship, which corresponds to the um

stagnation of society.

R now the base

Is something that

that exists materially

through how it is reflected in the ensemble of social relations that exist among the whole people.

This is its material reality, right?

And it's the process of reproduction

That facilitates these relations of production that exist among the whole people to develop.

But they but their development is thwarted when you have fascist dictatorship or imperialism and it uses direct force to basically stop the process by which, you know.

The reins of power come to reflect new changes in society.

Now, the in the opposite side of things,

Um

Again, the process of reproduction is a fact of economic rela uh economic reproduction, right?

So all the economic changes that happen come to actually be reflected here in the reality of the whole people, right?

So as Lo Rosa Luxemburg says, when someone has the courage to just tell the truth about what's going on, right, they are basically calling into question

This, right?

And by doing so, uh this also

This is like the foundation of a party, right?

The the party gets founded.

To reflect.

um, the reality of the whole people, right?

And the party derives its legitimacy and its strength from having correct insight into the real mechanisms, the gears, if you will, that are

Uh responsible for why the reproduction is happening in the way that it is, right?

So, um

My whole idea about the revolutionary dynasty is that a revolutionary dynasty basically facilitates.

And Mao is an example of this.

The process by which the imperial principle gets reproduced by having a constant way in which there's a feedback loop between how the how the this is the mass line from Mao, right?

The whole people respond to the imperial principle of state, right?

And then it comes to reflect them on that basis.

That's Mao's mass line, right?

And that

And and the reason it's a revolutionary dynasty is because it affects the institutions of civil society, where old elites get overthrown and there's a new uprising coming from the whole people.

That you know, at this level as well, I don't know if this is kind of crazy.

This is this diagram is not correct.

Like, I'm just doing this off the top of my head.

It's not, I could represent it better, but this is just a vague idea, right?

Um

Changes here get reflected here, right?

Which permit, um.

which opened the doors

and facilitate the process of the reproduction.

of society.

of the material base.

Because the problem with the base and the superstructure analogy is that, or representation, is that there's no room for reproduction.

How do things get reproduced?

Well, class antagonisms have to be reproduced, or class relationships of production.

These have to be reproduced.

They don't just exist forever by themselves.

There's an active process by which they're reproduced.

The way in which production reproduces these relations.

is by um being reflected in the superstructure, right?

And then uh from there it it uh it goes back to the uh

It goes back to um as a form of feedback to helping define the economic relations.

Not necessarily in a strictly coercive way either.

The institutions of law, the s you know, um regulations, whatever.

And

The superstructure has to actively reflect the base in order to facilitate its reproduction.

The problem is that when the superstructure stops being responsive to the base.

The change happens anyway, right?

It's an autonomous material or it's a material principle that society develops and reproduces itself materially through economic production, and that is what gives rise to alternative imperial principles, alternative forms of state power.

And

The idea about the revolutionary dynasty is that it's a new type of state power.

That can dynamically um not only dynamically

Adapt itself to this inevitable process of development and reproduction, but define itself on that basis.

So there's that.

I just wanted to kind of.

If I could do anything, I just want to shine light on the fact that.

The

The uh forces of the proletariat do not only exist in the state of guerrilla war among the whole people.

They also aspire to occupy the reins of power at the level of dictatorship.

So I know that should be given to you, but like the the way your mind represents it, you should also keep that in mind.

You shouldn't only consider the Imperial principle as the bad guys and the guerrilla war as the good guys.

Because proletarian dictatorship is an imperial principle in the strict sense that it is beyond the institutionally enumerated powers of a republic.

Uh can you explain the role of the republic, civil society, and the citizen?

Yeah, the republic is the form of the power of the state.

The principle reflects the content, the republic is the form.

Um and so the form of the state is all of the laws, the overt rules governing association, the rights, uh uh duties and so on.

And the citizen is the subject of that.

But in addition to the realm of civil society as defined by the form of the law, there is also the material dimension of the whole people, that act in the in reality, right, which is the ensemble of all social relations as they actually exist, not just as the state defines them as.

And that is what an imperial principle has to be responsive toward or reflect.

And it does so in two different ways.

One is a proletarian dictatorship, the other is imperialism or fascism.

And w what is decisive in determining that is the class struggle.

Hope that makes sense.

Uh

Hope you guys liked the stream today.

I should have prepared more for the.

I thought it would like be seamless, but apparently not.

Red maze, what's up?

I overthink it.

It's hard to explain, but vaguely.

Just understand CPC can also be an imperial principle.

Imperial.

The reason it's confusing is because imperial principle originally came from Lenin's imperialism to describe the way in which this is a new dictatorial principle of state power, the bourgeoisie, of a bourgeois dictatorship, and that's why it's reactionary.

But that dictatorial content of state power is unavoidable.

So that's and Lenin asserted that explicitly.

He said, just like the bourgeoisie is openly and nakedly revealing itself in dictatorship, this just proves the proletariat needs its own dictatorship because a neutral democracy is impossible and a neutral pure form of the state is impossible.

It's always going to be defined by the content of class dictatorship.