DRAGON AWAKENED

Oh

Oh

That's

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Nell

and I see I love and be nor do you

and

I'm interested

and I I don't know that I'm so near the dream of my dreamt

so no turn in my face. I'm I'm never You

I'm

Diggas

I'm

Dive I'm

I'm

back I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm Gore improvido The nivvo

From the vent of the vento

Rappito

And Oh, infinite Oh, Oh, oh, I love Oh

Oh

Oh

No

my

no deep in

and

you

see this I

Oh Oh Oh Oh I'll see her. Oh, yeah.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, yeah. Blue

Deep-in-pourri-blue

Ben-in-Bur-i-Sat and in the sea of I see that I'm sorry I'm Oh,

cat Oh,

Oh,

in the

blue

in the

blue

in the

ince to be to sun Oh deep in blue bell in the

tinge to be

assu can't I Oh

Oh

Oh

Nell

I'm I'm

New

and he said

and he says

to Oh my and city sense Oh I think I'm in the

I'm a dream of

so I'm not return my tea

I'm going to bring

my hands to pass to leave I'm I'm going to my

mania

and

I'm I'm I'm I'm of people in the

general

that's

a shadow

in the

spirit

voire

oh oh Oh, yeah, oh, oh, I can't have.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, no, I truth of three days ago.

Oh, oh, oh, oh. I'm Never Deep been put in Oh Nell

Deep in blue

And in Oh, yeah, oh, oh, ha, ha, can't.

Oh, oh, oh. oh oh

in the

blue in the

light of

in

star in suv

oh My heart Hey

My heart

And Oh, no, no, I know, he be able to do, and then it's any sense. I think I think the same thing I'm going to think the

so that I'm thinking a sonio

my name

my mind

and I'm

getting

I'm glad

in the car

and I'm

in the

I'm provisier of journey For

improvising

Or improvise

the nivocal

navvon

the vento

raptito

And

to fly

in the

sky

in the

of

infinite

I'm I love can and any city

Saturday

Oh my

Oh I'm Oh, Oh,

Oh

Oh In blue, the blue, and inceive of blue, and in cedar of blue, and then cedisar and as soon. in the felice

to be sure to see and Oh, ha. Oh, ha.

Kater

Oh, oh, oh, In blue, the pink of blue,

and in the sea of

starry on.

Oh, hey.

Oh, ha, ha, and I'm going to My heart can't

Oh

Oh

Oh

No

and you

and

to the city and soon and be able to be that

I'm saying

so

Oh I think I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

in the

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

revere of the

I'm Rappito I'm I've been the nivou of the Vento

Raptito

Enum I'm finito flying

Oh

my Oh Oh

Now

I think

people

and Oh, yeah. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, and Oh Oh Oh

Oh

Nell

and Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, okay, oh, okay, oh. I can't I

Oh

Oh

Oh

In

blue

in

the

I'm

in star

in his voice and in cemisarice to be in suvade

oh oh oh

no

in the

living

in the

man

and I see

in the

so

oh

ah ha ha and so Oh Oh Yeah I don't know that I'm

I'm sorry,

don't know

I'm going to turn my dream

and give you

in jean by the man

and the and I'm going to I'm I'm sure

I'm Marry

I'm

in I'm I'm

I'm

I'm never I'm And when I would have

Laughan Oh, can't

Oh, oh, oh.

Oh, oh, oh.

Now, I think he's putting blue, and you say I'm deep in the and

you

see this

I'm Oh, my, my, my, and so. I'm Nellu

Deep in blue and Nell-lis, and blue

and blue

and

in the sea of Oh, yeah, oh, ha, ha, can't tell you, oh, ho, oh, ho. Oh No

In blue

In pink

blue

And in

I see I'm

Sauri

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh, my love Oh, oh,

I can't

Oh, me

believe

there is

any

sense Thinks that I'm soo'i

I'm sorry so don't return

never

you

I'm trying

I'm I'm

in jeaned

with the

man and

the fracial

to live

out of

I'm

provis a rivet and I'm by O'ry improvise or the nivou,

and the ventura rapido

and I began to go to lair in the sky of the sky no

infinite. Let's shadow infinites a infinite

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh, can't like Oh

Oh

Oh

no and I'm going to be 70s Saturday Oh Oh, oh, oh, oh.

Oh.

Oh. In blue, deep in blue,

Deep in blue,

Felicity star in

to be in the sun. Felicity Sarin'is in sir I'm sure Oh, ha, can't tell me. Oh, oh, ha. Nehook deep blue, then it's redressress in blue in pink blue and

it's

and

I'm star as

oh can't I

Oh

Oh

now

if people

you

then it's

any set to fall love you and city sense

ooh

oh

la

la

la I think so

think I'm a-timore

my dreamtorn and I make

my tea

I'm in

the

man in the car and I'm going to the ventura Rappito And

I begin to

learn

Ince to

infinite

I'm

Oh,

I Oh, Oh, Oh,

I Oh, oh.

No, deep in the

people

and I'm

and I'm

sitting star my Oh, yeah. Oh, my.

Oh, yeah. Oh my Oh Oh,

Me too, Deep in blue

Felice

to be sure

to be sure

to be

Oh, Oh, yeah, oh, ha, ha.

Okay, day.

Oh, ha. in Oh

Oh

Oh

In the

blue

in the

blue

and in

star

in

so

I'm Oh any saddens Oh, Oh, man.

Oh,

and I know. Oh Nell

Ibidivoli

you

and I see

and I'm

Sera Sons

Oh

La la

la la I think I think the same.

I think that I'm

I'm not

never here

I'm never here

I'm going to

my car jane

I'm going to in the magic a minute For

you improvise

I'm privy

for the vivor

a ventura

people

And

to begin

to learn

Nels Nell Nell Nell Selo Infid And yet oner, La Cello of Infinite

Valle Oh, I can't

Oh, oh, oh, oh.

My blue, and blue.

And in so many cities' Sariress and I'm and I'm

and I'm sorry

and

I'm going to be.

And my.

And so, in blue

and blue

and blue and

to

see in Oh, yeah Oh, ha, ha,

catte

Oh, oh, oh, in blue

in blue

and in city

sadness

to fall

and I'm

a heart can't find.

Oh, oh.

Oh.

No, no, the people

in you, and it's any sight Nell no, the beauty and beauty and love

and

in the sadness soon I don't know I'm

I'm

I'm

so I'm

never never

you so so no turn me and you know

I'm

I'm

in

mind

and

I'm

back to see I Oh, I provisor, the nivio, the wind of rapid,

and I'm going to flyer in the sky to light, and the sky's all the sky's infinite.

Oh, oh, oh, my! that I'm in the spirit of Oh

Oh

Yeah Oh Oh

Oh

Now

I'm

You

many city

sadness

Oh

Oh Oh Oh RONALD RONAD

NAD. I The The The I don't know. I'm a man. and the and the uh...

I'm

and I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm I'm and the other people are not going to be.

I'm going to be.

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

a

I'm

I'm I'm not

I'm

and

I'm going to

I'm

and

I'm gonna be a lot of

I'm gonna

and and I'm

I'm

The I'm going to be. I'm going to be.

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm Wow, the mic has been on this entire time.

I didn't even realize.

Good thing I wasn't fucking talking about my master plans.

Good thing I wasn't discussing some of the conspiracies we have afoot.

Well, thank you everybody for these little

what do you call them they're bits

they're called hypes

I don't know what they mean

but there's a lot of them

and I thank you for these

coins

guys let's shout out to the sponsor And I thank you for these, these coins.

Guys, let's shout out to the sponsors of today's stream.

Australia's standing with the 50, 50, two hours ago, 50.

And PJ, the based from Texas with the 45

7 hours ago

I mean

I mean I mean I mean

we're talking about some

intense

crazy how do you how do y'all like my We're talking about some intense, crazy.

How do y'all like my cut?

You know?

Am I chop?

What's going on?

I don't answer that question.

I don't want to hear your opinion.

Anyway, y'all, what a blessed

day, what a blessed stream.

Okay, we already beginning with blessings.

Is it, we crabbed

his Ducane chop.

Shit.

Damn, man.

I always trying to get it right.

Anyway, we'll survive.

Anyway, y'all.

What a blessed day.

Okay, what a blessed day.

Because we got a lot on the table in terms of content, of course.

But also, I mean, it's been craved up.

The Krusty Krab opened early.

Phil Fo, what's up?

What's going on, bro?

Appreciate you.

Anyway, y'all

so y'all what's up i want to talk about some some shit i've been seeing that's some stupid

by the way venezuela apparently Venezuela signed his strategic partners.

Grandma Americana with the 25.

That's what I'm talking about that's all talking about what's up grandma americana with the 25 what What up, bro?

So, guys, apparently Venezuela has signed a strategic partnership with Russia.

I don't know what that means in practice.

I don't know how that, I don't know what maneuvering Russia and China are engaged in diplomatically to prevent the regime change, imminent regime change invasion of Venezuela from happening. But certainly, I hope

they will do everything in their power to stop this from happening.

And that, I mean, I'm going to be honest, I'm not optimistic about the situation.

And I hope to be proven wrong, okay?

I hope to absolutely be proven wrong

so I want to talk about something okay that doesn't seem

Russian troops and assets rumored to be in Venezuela see See, this is what I like to hear, and this is what I hope is, in fact, the case.

It's just the trouble is, you know, what happened in Syria.

I don't know.

I am not optimistic. I am not optimistic.

I'll just tell you that much.

I'm not optimistic.

But I'm not...

I haven't completely abandoned the possibility that miracles...

Sue is...

What is... What... Sue is? Thank you. But is what is? What what

Sue is? Thank you. But I don't even know

what bro. What is that?

Let me look

this up.

Kick

hype to dollars.

Hype to USD.

Huh?

Guys, what's going on

why can i why can i not find this

i don't know tell me guys what what what was just sent to me 1,000 oh 10 bucks bro thank you okay thank you bro

appreciate you thank you austral sannie what's, and now I understand. I got the assignment. Okay, we crabbing it up. All right, y'all. So we good. Okay, we good. And by the way, y'all, let me

continue talking about what I wanted to talk about.

Okay?

So... So let me continue. It's not a grievous. What's up, bro. Appreciate you. It's not exactly an optimistic situation. I'm not optimistic about it. It's actually quite disheartening to hear about.

And especially, you know, the thing that actually is disgusting that I've talked about extensively

is the way in which the so-called dissident right is just coming out in support of it.

And we're, you know, that, I mean, what do you, you say, what do you expect?

Of course, what do you expect?

But it's just so brazen and shameless and absolutely hideously disgusting to witness that.

Well, we remember the dissident right and their true disgusting face.

And speak of the devil, there's, there's things I want to talk about. There's things I want to talk about

that are actually pretty important, but are not as pressing in terms of like

the timetable talking about history, but I would like to talk about this extensively, and I will

talk about it and nobody's going to stop me, which is a myth, a meme that I've been seeing. Give me one second. Give me one second.

You're seeing the real infrared headquarters right now. This is a real place.

By the way, this is a real place.

It's not fake.

It's an actual place that exists.

This is actually what my real streaming room looks like.

If you were curious, this is what it looks like and and and uh and uh let me go ahead and uh just let me move this and fix this okay okay my camera's fine now okay there's always the danger, my camera is fine now.

Okay.

There's always the danger of my camera falling over, which is a disaster because it's an expensive camera.

Anyway, guys, I want to talk about something important.

And it is this meme that is actually starting to go viral that I'm seeing, okay, by the fascist LARPers, people trying to rehabilitate historical fascism. And it's a myth that I first encountered.

Comeron, what's up when the liar, Keith Woods and his debate partner. When I first debated them with Logo, they brought this up and it was the first time i heard this lie but it's it's gaining a lot

of traction so one of the reasons these people say that china is fascist and that oh it's just

italy's also fascist that there i've seen this on x so many times and i want you guys to make

memes to counteract it i want you guys to make memes to counteract it.

I want you guys to be prepared with sources to respond to this because it's a lie.

They claim that in the mid-1930s, the fascist state in Italy took over 80% of the economy and nationalized 80% of the economy

and controlled 80%. He said, it's the same thing as China! You know, the IRA, this is what it was called.

They created something called the IRA, the, you know, I don't know how to say it in Italian.

But this institute, it basically, you know, it had controlling shares and a bunch of different firms, right?

So it's the same thing in China, you know, how the state has controlling firms everywhere

and, you know, they control the economy.

It's about the control, you know.

It's about the iron fist of the fascist authority.

They're controlling the capitalist, and the

capitalists in Italy are under

control by the state.

Okay.

So, this is the

lie that they say that 80%

of the economy was owned by the state in

Italy, that the IRA was owned by the state in Italy, that the

IRA was an instrument

of genuine nationalization.

And I'm here to debunk that myth

so you can respond to this

lie properly

and, you know, know what you're

talking about. So, let's talk about Italy. So first of all, by the early 30s, the whole world was witnessing a banking crisis and a general crisis of capitalism. So across the world, companies were underperforming. There was a crisis in the rate of

profit. I don't have to get into it. Yada, yada, yada. There was banking crisis, all sorts of problems

going on in the world, right? And this hit Italy very hard. Italy was already not a very rich country, very developed country compared to others.

So in the early 30s, there was a banking crisis in Italy because the major Italian banks, and actually before I want to get into

anything, I want to talk about the Italian banks. So the major Italian banks, I think I have two

off the top of my head, one of them, and I'm not going to remember the name, so you have to

forgive me. One of them was outright an not going to remember the name so you have to forgive me one of them was

outright an organ of international finance it was created by the Germans you know and

all this money it ultimately comes from the the British and the Dutch or whatever

but the Germans the Austrians and the Swiss, they created a bank in Italy and created

on the German model.

I think this was in the early 1900.

So that was one of the major Italian banks, just a direct, like, tether and proxy for, you know, the interests of the global international capitalist class. Another bank was created by these weird, you know, Genovese's ancient vampire,

the nobles and landowners and merchants and all these creepy weird fucks,

you know, these Italian inbred aristocrats,

these creepy vampires.

Hero, what's up with the 100?

Suis, what's up?

So this is the origin of the major Italian banks.

Fully private banks, they represent the international capitals class, and they also

represented, in a way, I would would argue domestic feudal interests that existed

within italy you know that were very old that dated for very back in the day the weird you know

they wear those masks like eyes wide shut and they're molesting children and this is what they do

anyway um let me continue and they're molesting children, and this is what they do. Anyway,

let me continue.

They're doing all these rituals and shit.

A bunch of weird, creepy fucks on his fucking vampire disgusting abominations

on the face of the earth.

Anyway, I don't want to get into that.

So they were hit with a crisis in the early 30s because these banks had issued a ton of loans.

You know, this was the German model.

They were trying to prop up.

There is a dual model from the German the German model. They were trying to prop up, though there's a dual model from the German

Universal Bank model. I'm going to explain it to you, okay? And I want you guys to bear with me here. So what they

would do is that in order to acquire the collateral assets with which to expand the issuing of loans,

they would actually become shareholders in these various newly propped up and created industrial firms so these industrial firms and companies

would be created that are expected to yield revenues and grow in size the banks would have a

controlling interest through shares directly, but those shares would then be used as collateral in order to lend out more loans, right?

And the companies in question, you know, these banks are like parasites.

The companies are servicing interest to them

because they're in debt to these companies

and the debt will never be paid off

because this is how the companies acquire

in a combination of shares and loans that they can collateralize and then thereby, you know, expand their loanmongering, usurious bankster interest.

So they don't call it usury.

They call an interest, but it's the same thing.

Majority shares, I would

say the decisive, I mean, the

original starting capital that made

the industries and companies

possible in the first place, okay?

So the Italian capitalism had a very peculiar,

strange character from the outset, okay? So in the 30s, when we're talking about industries

in Italy, when we're talking about, you know, the means of production, so to speak, the banks own that

shit. We're not talking about, like, private captains of industry and bold, audacious captains

of industry. These are, all of them were slaves of the banks okay and you need to understand that context to understand

the nature of the fascist nationalizations wink wink and nationalizations okay so um there is a banking crisis and because these companies that a lot of them were

originally created through the loans that these banks issued uh they were they were underperforming

just like the rest of the world. So they were

not doing well. These industrial firms were being hit with the global crisis that everyone else was,

and they were increasingly insolvent, they they became bad their their liabilities the

banks liabilities with respect to them was endangering the banking system within

Italy was endangering the big banks and the banksters,

and thereby, you know, endangering their fucking foreign vampire paymasters or whatever, right?

The international financial networks of capitalism.

So these banks that have assets,

they have shares and they have loans,

they're bad loans.

This is a typical crisis of capitalism.

It happens all the time.

It happens in 2008.

They have these shit, bad loans.

They need to fucking get rid of them.

Because they're threatening to destroy the banks, okay?

And so the banks, you know, they had these these horrible loans they had these worthless shares and uh you know these outstanding liabilities that were an immense burden on them immense immense burden, immense burden, okay?

So what did Mussolini?

What did Mussolini do and the fascist state do within Italy?

Did they suddenly the corporate vision of the syndicalism?

Did they suddenly have a change of heart and decide to, you know,

now we will tell the capitalist what to do?

No, I'm going to tell you the Ponzi scheme that happened

in case one of these anime retards

try to say that fascist Italy nationalized shit, which they didn't.

What happened was like one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in the history of Europe, which is saying something, right?

This thing called the i r i was this new um this new institution created by the state right

and what it did is it relieved the banks of their outstanding liabilities with respect to, A, their loans, as well as their shares in these industrial firms.

And the IRA took those from the banks.

Well, it didn't, sorry, it didn't take them from the banks.

It took the burden from the banks that the ownership of those things entailed.

Now, how did it do, how did it acquire the loans and how did it acquire the shares?

Okay, let me explain this Ponzi scheme to you.

How did the IRA acquire the controlling shares in these various bankrupt and insolvent companies to steer them and restructure them and whatever it did how did they do it so if it's a net when

they say nationalization what comes to your head is like you know bolsheviks style expropriation

they're just going to take it that's not what they fucking did so let's just start there they didn't nationalize it what

they actually did is they issued bonds in order to acquire the loans and the shares from the banks, the controlling shares in the firms. They issued bonds in order

to finance it. So they paid for it. That with the nationalization compensated the owners,

the banks, okay? But here's the hilarious part. This is the

important part. And I want you to, who did they sell these bonds to, these state bonds? Who did they

sell the state bonds to?

To pay for it.

To the banks. So the banks bought bonds from the state, and the state used what the banks gave them

in order to literally relieve the banks of their liabilities

and rescue them

so it was like an obi was like worse than an obama bank bailout

what happened is the public sector assumed the liabilities.

The public...

The capital is fucked up, so the

public sector not only had to pay

for it, but in paying

for it, had to

indebt itself to these private banks so the state became indebted

through the issuing of bonds to the banks and the entire purpose of this switcheroo the state state was going to use public finances to make these

firms solvent again, to restructure them, to fix them, whatever. And instead of the banks

getting serviced interest from these shitty unreliable firms and

companies they had a more secure uh you know collateral and and effectively a controlling interest

in the state the state you know was a more secure asset to own. Basically,

the banks would own the state itself instead of the fucking companies. And you own the companies,

the companies, how reliable are they in terms of servicing the debt? Well, clearly they weren't. But if the state

takes over, quote unquote, and then services you that same fucking interest on the debt, but just in a

new form, in the form of bonds, it's more reliable. You're using the power of politics and the power of the

state to pay debt and pay interest to the bankers. And that is the essence of what fascism is.

Fascism is basically when instead of the market in the private sector, the banksters acquire their usurious interest-mongering um uh

using the batons of the state the state takes a big stick and it beats the shit out of the debtors

uh in this case the italian public

in order to pay the creditors usually in a a normal capitalist economy, this has to happen in a purely

economic way. But because of a crisis in capitalism, the banksters will weaponize the state

and use public resources and assets in order to pay themselves, I guess, in order to exact their pound of flesh proverbially and so to speak.

So this is actually what happened in Italy. The private sector took over the state effectively, fully and completely. The firms in question that the IRA took over were never independent to begin with.

They were controlled and owned and created in the first place by the banks,

but they became a financial liability because they were underperforming.

And so we're talking about a banking crisis crisis we're talking about these banks not only they're no longer able to be paid anymore

uh the the foundations upon which they rest are are being shaken so what musilini in the fascist state actually did was they rescued the banks so

anytime somebody says the i ri nationalized the italian economy just tell the truth what what what the

fascists did was rescue the banks by making the public assume their liabilities,

which is exactly what happened.

At no point, at no point, at no point was the economy expropriated at no point did the state actually

fucking own anything everything they owned was financed from bonds that were issued on credit from the banks themselves.

If the state owned it, the state wouldn't be in debt to the banks, but they were.

This like weird, by the way, credit or debtor, Cissigy, it's like it was a prototype of the American super imperialist system described by Hudson.

But you see this in Italy, absolutely.

Because here the state, the IRA, is both a creditor by assuming the bank's liabilities, but also a debtor.

Because, you know, in order to finance the acquisition of these shares in these firms and the acquisition of the bank's debts

uh it had to sell bonds right and the bonds are themselves servicing uh interest or servicing payments

so you see that this is um this is why I wanted to talk about it.

It's funny when they say, oh, the fascists were fighting the capitalists.

The entire state was made a prostitute of the capitalist class.

The public continued servicing the bankster vampires in a new form, assuming all the liabilities and the

burdens. But where were the benefits? Well, there weren't any benefits. And although the scheme was a failure, couldn't work so how the math the balance sheet is not going to square when you think about it just in these terms okay the state is going to issue bonds what is going to what is going to issue bonds. What is going to guarantee the reliability of the state issued bonds? What's going to securitize the IRA in the Italian state?

Because everything is going to shit.

Well, it's war.

Let's go invade Ethiopia.

Let's go conquer and attack other Croatia and the Balkan countries, whatever.

I'd be steal their resource and steal their land.

And that way we can make the balance sheet even.

Okay?

We can somehow ensure that the whole thing doesn't spiral into an infinite void and vortex of insurmountable debt.

And we just take resource.

I mean, by the way, does that sound familiar?

This is what the USA is basically de facto doing right.

Actually, not even de facto, did you're about to do right now with venezuela so

yeah they socialized the losses that's what happened in fascist italy they socialized the losses

that the state did not nationalize anything in the sense of expropriation.

They didn't just take it over and say, this is ours now.

They paid for it using loans, bonds, given to them, by private banks.

They paid for it. Not only did they recompense the banks, they did it on and with interest, on interest.

Yeah, the Italian military industrial complex was also controlled by the banking cartels as well.

So there was no state-owned enterprise in Italy. Nothing was nationalized. So let's compare that to China. How did China acquire? It's like so stupid, I have to say this. Let's compare the IRA to Chinese institutions, the Chinese, the People's Bank, the People's National Bank, the various state-owned

enterprises, the various assets, and whatever. How did the CPC acquire the various means

of production that it does own within China.

Well, they originally had them in the first place because under the Mao era,

it was owned as such. It was a was a traditional soviet style socialist economy so the

cpc in the state already was the controlling interest there was no mediation by any banks

they built it in the first place and they did not build it on credit they didn't take out loans

from banks in order to do so.

They did so through sheer willpower, through the Mao era mass mobilizations.

Now, admittedly, in the first five-year plan of the People's Republic of China China China was taking on

immense debts

from the Soviet Union

and the great leap forward

and the rest happened

because China didn't want to be indebted

to the Soviet Union anymore. So

it had to just build everything up from scratch

using sheer willpower.

So the way the fascists

like to posture, oh, we're just going to do it

with the pure will! The way

they posture

and this facade they put up,

well, the Chinese actually

did use sheer willpower

to build up their economy.

And that's why China has

state ownership

to this day.

They didn't have to borrow from banks and recompense capitalists and, no, they just fucking

did it.

They're ones who build a circuit.

What's going on, bro?

Appreciate you. um and and you need to understand in italy you don't even have to look at the industrialists and the capitalists

because those are not the people at the highest point of the pecking order.

It's the bankers.

The bankers in Italy were in command and control of the whole thing.

The whole history of Italy, the whole history of Germany, it's all about finding roundabout ways to service interest on debt.

Germany was the same thing.

Germany's – and you know what's funny about Italy?

Let me continue.

Even post-1935 with the sanctions by the League of Nations that was imposed on Italy,

at no point did Italy legally declare the obligations that it owed Britain for World War I null and void. It never did so.

The outstanding payments, the private banks of Italy,

owed to the foreign banks,

they may have been disrupted by war,

but they were never legally nullified.

They were still on paper and legally, and the fascist government could have nullified them and

canceled the debts, and they didn't. They didn't, because there was an expectation that if the fascist powers won the war, that the international capitalist, the financial capitalists, would be recompensed and would be, you know, continuing to extract and suck the blood of the resources and capital and wealth of Italy and of the world, of Ethiopia, by proxy in the world, you know?

Yeah, these cartels, as Rev is saying, I mean, this is another example of the Ponzi scheme of Italian fascism.

Private companies and banks would threaten to go on strike.

They would, they would, um, overcharge on their shitty equipment, their war equipment.

And if the government didn't pay the prices that they wanted, they would threaten to go on strike.

So this was the fucking circus of fascist Italy, where literal capitalists, just like an Ayn Rand's book, Atlas Shrug,

they would literally threaten to go on strike.

Has that ever happened in China?

I think that guy Jack Maugh, he like said one thing semi-critical about China's government one time. Nobody ever heard of him again. But in Italy, we're supposedly, it's the same thing as China or China is a fascist country apparently.

In Italy, the so powerful and emboldened were the private parasite class that they would threaten to go on strike if the state didn't pay for their ridiculously, you know, overmarked shitty, shitty assets.

So when people say China is just like fascist Italy, because, well, IRI, Italy, the state-owned, they're talking, they're taking excerpts from these retarded books where they're like, you know that one excerpt were like, effectively, Italy had the second largest state-owned assets in the world next to the Soviet Union.

They take that and read it, and there's all these assumptions that come with that, that they just,

oh, really, base Mussolini just took it from the capital?

No, he paid for it on credit to private banks,

who themselves wanted to get rid of it because it was a liability that was threatening to destroy them.

The state didn't actually own it.

How can the state own it if they were indebted, first of all, to these banks?

Second of all, the state didn't even have, when they said, oh, they controlled it. Controlled it for what purpose

to restructure them and make them

solvent so that they could be given back to the banks?

That's another thing. This wasn't even considered

a permanent solution. The idea was that the state was going to take

these liabilities, take on the burden, fix the state was going to take these liabilities take on the burden fix the mess the

capitalist made in the first place and give it back once they did that so this is the reality instead of the fake false history that they're trying to feed you.

The IRA was not an organ for genuine nationalization.

Genuine nationalization means, I'm taking this factory.

This factory is mine.

I own it, and that's it.

That's not what the IRA did.

The IRA took, it paid for shares

that

control

it sometimes

controlling

shares sure

that banks

owned

in some

firms

that these

shares

were liabilities

by the way

and took

the liabilities the debts

as well

and paid for them using

not only using public coffers and public

treasuries

but by issuing

bonds to the very same banks

and you want to know yeah yeah and you want to know issuing bonds to the very same banks.

And you want to know, yeah, yeah, yeah. And you want to know the worst part. This is the fascist playbook. You want to know how else the state paid for this? Or I should say the

public paid for it? How did the public pay for this?

This burden that the state took on on behalf of the banks.

How did the public pay for it?

Well, in what literally is one for one, the same thing as austerity that we see today, like in Javier, Malays, you know, Argentina and elsewhere.

The Italian fascist state privatized a bunch of previously publicly owned assets to pay for this shit.

Literally privatizations happened on a monumental scale in both Italy and Germany under Hitler.

For this exact reason.

So, yeah, yeah, and the people, you know, yeah, that's another good point.

Who actually own the shares in the first place, in the, you know, the FASH, the IRA, where they're just faceless public servants and bureaucrats?

No, they were literally the former capitalist industrialists and landowners

themselves, the agricultural

landowners. So there you go.

I mean, that was not

nationalization. That was not

the state is taking

over. No, it didn't take over. It became

a def, it became a de-jure, you know, literal tool,

direct, like, weapon of the capitalist class to do, to accomplish what it could not through the market.

It became the prostitute.

The IRA, it's like institutes, let me look it up because I don't, I don't, it's something in the, in, uh, in Italian. I don't speak italian all right see yeah i didn't know that giuseppe was one of them

one of the richest italian commercial bankers see i didn't even know that. They go, well, China also has billionaires.

Hey, let's look at the balance sheet. All this shit was created by the CPC. All of it.

The whole economy. The whole economy was created by the communist state.

And to whatever extent, there is a private sector

in China and whatever,

that was created

first by the state.

Second,

people were allowed to benefit

as beneficiaries, you know, of a regime-led system.

In Fascist Italy, you had a pre-existing capitalist class that made the state its bitch.

So the order is completely reversed.

In China, the CPC and the state owns, controls, and beats the shit out of the capitalists.

Well, let's call them the entrepreneurs to be politically correct.

But in Italy, the opposite was true.

The capitalists and the, the, the, the, the, they all banded together and made the state,

their prostitute, their bitch.

And they raped the Italian public wholesale,

looting public

treasuries, indebting

the Italian people unfairly

and unduly, and

privatizing public goods

in order to pay for it.

So it was a big Ponzi scheme. And by the way, doesn't this make

sense? Do you really, I mean, even from what you know of the aesthetics of Italian fascism,

just judging off of that, you really think the state just came in and took over? No, they didn't.

It was a big...

It was a... Mussolini was putting on a big show. Doesn't it make sense it was a Ponzi scheme the whole time?

Because by the way, it was a Ponzi scheme the whole time. Because by the way, it was.

It was.

It was just a big Ponzi scheme.

Okay.

Like, no,

what, you think they wipe

the debts and just said, well, we're never

going to pay? That's what Lenin did.

See, the difference between

communism and fascism, isn't that

like fascists were more realistic and like, oh, no, we don't want to do these utopian experiments.

It has nothing to do with social engineering or social experimentation.

The difference between communism and fascism is that the communists straight up say, hey, bankers, fuck you, we're not, we're literally just not going to pay. We're not paying you any debt. We're wiping it out. We're taking over like, fuck you. like literally, go kill yourself.

And then the fascist way is like, we have to, of course, fascists are more realistic.

They're not breaking with international finance.

They're not canceling the debt.

They're not, we believe in the

sacred institution of private

property. When fascists say

that, you think they're talking about

some Joe Schmo

like small farmer

who's defending his ranch with his

dogs, they're talking about private who's defending his ranch with his dogs.

They're talking about private property.

They're talking about... They're talking about assets and debts owned by banks.

That's what they're talking about.

They're talking about outstanding debts that have to be serviced through interest. Usury. When they use the term usury, remember this in history. Whenever you read them talking about usury, they're talking about competitive

market petty usurers who undercut the big dog interest-bearing, loanmongering, sorry, the loan-mongering sorry the loanmongering

big bankers

often felt

cheated and cheapened

by these lower rate

you know usurious like

maybe Shlomo Schekyllstein

in history. In history, I'm just

going to tell you the truth. In European

history, Shlomo Schekyllstein

would sometimes sit on the corner

and you'd give these very like cheap,

trashy loans,

interest-bearing loans, right?

And they were competitive, but it was

just like small fry shit.

And it would disrupt sometimes

and it would fuck up

the bigger

the bigger fish

and the you what they call

usury the biggest

usurers of Europe

were

goyim institutions the goyem

were the most

the elite goyim ruling class these are the true usurers the difference between usury and interest is that usury oftentimes has more competitive rates than interest but it's the same fucking thing if you read the bible it's the same thing

but and i have to tell you the truth the church changed the name

from usury to interest

interest was more reputable

it was more official

but it was the same fucking thing

maybe there was a Jew on the corner

who would offer a more competitive

sleazy rate

and it was less

institutionalized.

See, the Jews of Europe that were

giving out these interest-bearing loans,

they were small fry.

Look at the Crusades. Look at the Knights knights templar look at all these different orders that were created the knights of malta these are the big dogs

with what they call the institution of usury.

The Medici's, the Genovese,

who were at the Battle of Constantinople.

Why? To defend,

Khrushandong, Daio's fault!

Why do you think the Crusades happen?

Deus fault! Because the Muslim!

The Muslims had nothing to do with it. Actually, they had nothing to do with it.

They didn't care about Muslims.

But Muslims are just some desert people in Arabia.

They were targeting the other churches

so they could have this monopoly

for the enslavement of the entire world through usury.

And Michael Hudson, he's, I think his book, I don't know if it came out yet, he's writing a book

about it on the Crusades and the whole purpose of the Crusades.

All the things the right wing glorifies.

So fascism, the Crusades and Deus Volt

and all this nonsense.

It's all a bunch of Ponzi schemes.

The right, and a matter of fact, the right wing is, there's two wings of politics, the left wing, the revolutionary wing.

And then literally, I'm not kidding, the Ponzi scheme wing.

Because I think about this, Trump is a Ponzi scheme.

They like, they unironically liked Trump. They liked him, I should say, unironically. He was a big Ponzi scheme. Fascism is a Ponzi scheme. The Crusades was a Ponzi scheme. World War I was a Ponzi scheme.

And let me tell you right now, what's one of the biggest Ponzi schemes that just, I just exposed the right wing that they're a bunch

of Ponzi scheme

peddling and

duped suckers

the crypto shit

at the end of every

you know

it's all it's people are trying to make money

that's it they're much of scammers ponzi scheme i mean god in heaven forgive us for being such suckers.

The ACP, we're the only ones are not in it for money.

We're not scamming anyone with this Ponzi scheme, with a...

With a...

Hustlers University with shit coins or nothing.

We're actually the genuine entrepreneurs.

Let's build manufacturing.

Let's build industry.

We're just broke. we can't do it

yet by the way that's going to change

but um

we're the we're the only ones that are not scammers

every other political faction are scammers

money that are not scammers every other political faction are scammers money deletes i mean look you know how

stupid we are you know i gotta say a solid i would say half of everything you guys give me, I give back.

And the other half I used to pay for my existence.

Pay my bills, pay my rent, pay my...

You know, you think about, like, am I hoarding anything?

I look at my fucking bank account.

I'm like, I gotta be the most stupid

fucking guy in the world. Even, you know why I've been crabbing it up? And the reason I don't

say this is because I can't make guarantees. And it's always good. In for NRG, energy what's up i've been crabbing it up not just because i'm

going to be going to that southeast summit with the acp chapters soon not just because of the

i'm going to be going to california not just because i want, I'm going to be going to California, not just because I wanted

to visit more chapters, visit more states, but because I want to do that, oh, so, so what's up,

I wanted to make it a surprise, but I don't think it's happening in December as planned.

I want to do that infrared event.

I want to do the merch.

And I know you guys are,

you guys are,

you guys are trying hard.

I can see.

You guys are crabbing it up for sure.

But I feel like an idiot, you know?

Like everybody else is a scammer.

I genuinely...

I'm literally like a...

Like an Oriental despot. I'm just I taking your your money to give it back to you in some kind

of way lucas what's up you know i'm just centralizing it it's like a tax you're just you're allowing me to use it for our movement anyway uh you know the

the the michigan infrared event that i wanted to do remember that guys anyway you know the the the michigan infrared event that i wanted to do remember that guys

anyway you know this is the truth you know um it is a dog it is absolutely a dog eat dog world

and nobody let nobody ever deceive you otherwise, but we are genuinely like the ones that are not motivated by money. Now, are we motivated by other things? Yes. I mean, do I enjoy being a communist? Yes. Do I enjoy this? Absolutely. It's plenty motivation. But most others are just trying to get rich i'm just telling you the truth fascism was a ponsie scheme never forget it it was a big ponzi scheme and then they try to

say the same about communists but you look at at the bank account of Lenin and there was literally

zero. What was Stalin's

wealth? Stalin had one pipe

and like one outfit.

Nothing.

They tried to claim that Castro had trillions

or something.

And it was a lie.

They tried to claim that Hugo Chavez and Maduro, they try to say Xi Jinping, they're liars.

They're liars.

Communists are not motivated by money.

Oh, you guys, don't worry about it. You guys are, you're very generous army. We crab it up. We crab it up like crazy in here, right?

Anyway, what I'm trying to say, though, is that I've been to see this meme too much where they go,

Italian fascists actually stuck it to the capitalist.

They were the prostitutes of the capitalists.

The IRA took it.

You got that from Keith Woods, who took it out of his ass.

I think, did they all get this from Keith Woods, this lie?

Is that where it originates?

The IRA

was a Ponzi scheme to indebt the public

sector to the banks.

It had nothing, nothing was nationalized. Nothing was nationalized.

Nationalization means you own it.

The state never owned it.

Well, they controlled it.

Okay.

To do what?

They controlled it, and since they managed it,

to fix it up and clean it up for the banksters.

That's all they fight.

And they made the public pay for it.

Amila, what's up?

Sue is, what's up with the 10, bro?

Appreciate you.

Is it really all come from Keith Woods?

Because it's such the biggest lie that

I saw a tweet with 200

likes, I saw a tweet with 500

likes repeating this lie

that the IRA nationalized

things in the Italian guy. No, it fucking didn't.

The IRA didn't fucking nationalize

anything. Nationalization means you take it lionel what's up amila

what's up appreciate you nationalize equals take

you take it and it's yours

it can't belong to you if you're taking it on credit

from private banks

at no point

did fascist Italy become

autarkic

you guys need to make an IRA

you need to make a meme of mocking the fascists who say that the IRA, say this was Obamaomics.

This was nothing.

You say, put Obama's face.

Put Obama's face and say, this is the true fascism bailing out the banks

ha ha ha ha ha The You know what Anonymous?

Anonymous, I'm going to put you on the spotlight

as you're trying to get away with it

because you know stream labs is telling me

renissio

bro i'm thanking you

you're trying to be shy and shit

thank you bro thank you bro Bro, I'm thanking you. You're trying to be shy and shit.

Thank you, bro.

Thank you so much, man.

I appreciate you.

But Stream Labs, no, it's not his real name.

It's a username.

Come on. Don't be stupid it's a username it's a username bro thank you he's

trying to be shy thank you bro appreciate you wow or maybe that's maybe it's a glitch on

stream lab it could be a glitch. Anyway, whoever it was, thank you.

Appreciate you, bro.

I mean, let's, I mean, we crabbing it up.

I mean, we're crabbing it up in here.

Nearly 200 gifted subs.

If not, I think we did hit 200.

See, let's see, it's 95 plus 50, 145 plus 25.

That's 175. 145 plus 25 that's 170 plus 10 it's 180 and i mean we plus 5 at one 18 eighty five plus another five one ninety ninety

yeah we we basically two hundred subs some real shit We basically 200 subs.

That's some real shit.

They massacred an entire monastery.

The people need you understand this.

Yellowstone with a 10.

What's up?

What's up?

Yellowstone with a 10. What's up? What's up? Yellowstone with a 10.

What's it? We crabbing it up in this bitch.

This is the crusty crab has never been more.

I mean, this is the

chum bucket.

Plankton must be watching this shit.

Crying his eyes out.

Okay, the crusty crab is popping here.

We got the...

You know what this...

Do you know what today's stream is?

What's up, Taktow?

We've been selling those...

What the fuck they call them?

Pretty patties.

Pretty patties.

Today we got this on some pretty Pretty Patty type of shit

You know, oh so's what's up?

Sold out

We read like crabs in this bitch

I mean, wow

Oh, do you mention taxes?

I have a fucking heart attack.

I don't want to hear about taxes, all right?

I don't want to hear about that.

Tax season.

I saw the term tax season.

I don't like that.

Don't like that don't like that term anyway

I wanted to

I wanted you guys to understand

and combat and counteract this argument

whenever you hear it

because it's a disgusting lie that I keep

seeing. The fascists nationalize a fucking thing.

These people don't even read the book.

Is Sue is with the 20.

What's up, bro?

I nationalize nothing.

Okay?

Nationalization.

So, you know, you guys, do you have the ability to make the memes?

That's the question.

I saw a meme get 2,000 likes, where they were like responding to a leftist

they were like

the fascists are the ones that fought the capitalist

some bullshit like that. It's like

and fuck the phalanches. I don't want to hear about that.

Anyway,

why is it? I don't want to hear about that. Anyway,

why is it so hard to be normal?

It's like, you know that meme where they're driving and there's like a retarded screaming autistic child?

Why can't you just be normal?

Why do you have to flirt with the flange and all this night?

You realize, do you think the Spanish Republicans were like transgender weirdos or some shit?

They were honest, good communists.

Just fucking be normal.

Why do you have to flirt with these stupid, like, banker, gimp slave, like, child-raping

death squads?

Why do you have to sympathize with these weird, like, satanic freakazoid?

Why can't you just be fucking normal?

Like, oh, we have to be the phalanche.

Oh, we have to be this.

We have to, oh, the black shirts.

Why is that appealing to you?

Because you think communists are care bears?

Is that what you think?

You think communism is like weenie hut juniors and fascism is where the cool people are?

Because you've got it dead fucking wrong, buddy.

Okay, being, you know, being a gimp, a deranged gimp going around, killing, and there's nothing cool about that.

All right?

The communists were just honest, good people.

I mean, what can you say?

And they were warriors and they were tough.

You know, isn't that sad?

It's like stolen valor from the Italian partisans.

Because when you think about it, who were the real...

The Italian partisans, I mean, they were running through grenades and they were some tough motherfuckers.

The partisans were sons of the soil, you know, over the hills and the mountains and some tough, they were some tough, tough, tough tough tough people okay the italian partisans they were true

red-blooded warriors and then people with the black shirts or the black shirts were what do i have to say it they

were doing the pride parade on rome and then they did what they were gimp slaves of the banksters

they would go and massacre workers and go to the countryside and massacre, beat, and rape farmers, and shit. There's nothing tough about that.

So why should we hear this? Why do we...

I ought to have to keep hearing these people that are so confused.

They want to sympathize with the historical fascists, because they don't know the real history of the communists.

They think communism is

weenie hut juniors because

and you know the who is to blame it's

well a combination. The Trotskyites

who fled the Soviet Union that came

to the U.S. that completely poisoned

the well and then of course the CIA

completely discrediting, blackening, and twisting the name, the good name of the left wing and of the Marxists and of the communists. They totally, totally fucking twisted it. And by the way, all the bad things you hear about the Republicans in Spain, it came from

the anarchists.

The anarchists, two things.

The anarchists were literally adjacent, sociologically and ideologically, to the phalanjists to the fascists the only reason

the fascists were feuding with it was like interfactional interfascist infighting same demographic

same background same origins same history It was like a split, you know,

the syndicalist in the syndicalist movement, okay? Subterranean, what's up? So anarchists were always

within proximity to the fascists.

Can you explain the fascism is anarchism thing?

I have a whole video on it on YouTube.

Well, how can I explain you here better than in my video?

Okay.

There's a whole history of anarchism going back to the 1800s, and this evolves into fascism.

So anyway, in Spain, there was some, just like how sometimes in a inter, you know, when communists are fighting, rightists, you'll get some Trotskyite

on the side of the rightest.

This was the same thing in the case of the anarchists

who were on the side of the republic.

At every turn, the anarchists were undermining

the Republican government.

They weren't following orders.

They were engaging in, you know, treason, you could say.

The alignment was very limited in practice.

And then at the tail's end, when it became decisive, when Stalinists were on the cusp of taking over the Republican

government, the anarchists and the Trotskyites and the liberals all colluded to open the gates

for Franco.

So the real

element within the Republican

movement, the Stalinists,

were snaked

by the liberals, the anarchists,

and the Trotskyites.

And these people were never, ever calling for the extremism and the wild insane, the thing about shooting nuns or...

This was some fascioid mental rot.

The anarchist shared with the philangis and it had nothing to do with the

Stalinists in the republican movement or the repub the genuine real Republicans in Spain

had nothing to do with that.

Nothing.

So if you sympathize with, you know, the counter-revolution in Spain because you hear about atrocities committed by Republicans.

Understand these were atrocities committed by the anarchists the same people that betrayed the republic later on.

And by the way, the atrocities were overwhelmingly committed by the monarchists anyway. But I digress.

But I digress.

You know, I don't...

But, you know, sometimes, guys, I look into these people that sympathize with historical fascism.

And you'd think that, oh, you know, you just misguided.

And then you look into them in their psychology.

And then, like, these people are in, like, dog raping discords and monkey torture

I'm making that up but it's like there's some very dark weird people

like with very dark

psychologies and personalities

these are not people looking for good

it's like no we could show you the good path.

No, these people, they're not looking for...

They're not looking for anything good.

They have very, very sick, sick, morbid mental illnesses that make them attracted to depravity again they are attracted to depravity

these all these people are attracted to depravity absolutely and they are just these are the people

that are ripping their body

parts so off and they're

eating them and they're

gore fetishes and they're just a lot

of horrible things

so I'm telling you the true history.

I'm giving you real history right now.

You know, I'm not giving you the fake stuff.

I'm not giving you nonsense.

I'm giving you true history, you know.

Okay, anime and I don't want to fucking hear about this.

When you think about it, it seems like leftists are the worst. And by extension, it seems like theists are the worst and by extension

it seems like the left is the worst

but I have to say

honest to God

I have to say

all the sick psychopathy

and horrible horrific things

leftists are guilty

of those are

general symptoms of a sick

disgusting society

and you know you're saying fuck leftists

and you have a right to say that yeah fuck them

but

compared to everyone else,

they're actually not that bad.

I'm just going to be honest.

And I'll tell you exactly why.

Because almost every leftist community

enforces moral guidelines to a bare minimum usually

you know do not tolerate pedophilia like they're like straight up they actually have they like they enforce morals in some kind of way

they don't they're not loose in terms of like they don't promote rape okay they don't promote

bestiality like

what about

Vosch and Destiny

I'm talking about more

I'm talking about

like our red lib

enemies I'm not talking about

Vash and Destiny

I would not consider

them leftists

in the conventional sense.

Nor do I even think they identify

with that, you know?

Yeah, like Hakeem types.

Let's just start there, like the Hakeem types.

Red lips. Like, let's just like start there, like the Hakeem types. Red lips. Like, they're straight up, not that bad.

All right? Or even the Hassan Piker

community. Fuck it, I'll say it. Like, they're

pretty bad.

And you're like, well, they're laughing at Charlie Kirk's

murder.

And like,

yeah,

that's horrible.

But it's just

like compare them

to all the other

political subcultures.

Like,

compare them to the rest,

though.

Think about that.

Like,

compare them to the rest.

The rest are pretty bad.

They're all bad, but we'll never stop calling out the corruption.

We'll never stop criticizing them.

Because, you know, it is dangerous that you can use the veil of morality to excuse extreme immorality,

extreme depravity.

I'm not denying that.

And they do that, you know,

for sure.

But it is nice

to have, like, basic standards

in place that are like,

you know, this kind of, like, fetish you have for, like, you know this

kind of like fetish you have for like

anime, pedophilic beastiality?

It's kind of like

not okay

or allowed.

It's kind of nice to have that

like standard in place.

And these extreme, right communities, they don't have that standard.

They don't have anything like that.

You know, hey, guys, hey, am I wrong?

Like, it's nice to enforce some degree of morality, you know?

And my whole critique of leftism has not been against the law.

I'm merely a Christian.

I want the spirit of the law, not just the dead letter.

My problem with leftism is it hinges on the dead letter of the law,

whereas I think we need to go further and enforce the spirit of the law. It's not enough to simply ban and prohibit, you know, inhuman, grotesque things. We need to follow the spirit of the law as well by banning anime altogether.

Okay, but in all seriousness, in all seriousness, no, that's an important distinction, the letter of the law versus the spirit of the law.

Infrared has been known to be much more charitable

toward right-wingers

and conservatives

and people who are misguided.

And we don't hide

behind the veil

of political correctness.

And all of these things

are true, you know? and this is what makes our community great

but in the end of the day let's never underestimate the the genuine evil that does exist on the

right it's genuine evil we're trying to save a lot of people that are on some very dangerous pipelines, and we're trying to rescue their consciousness from filth and degeneracy. But don't underestimate there are absolutely psychopathic, antisocial bad faith actors

on the right.

They dominate the right, actually,

who are genuinely just bad people

like pieces of shit.

They're like genuinely like dark,

evil people.

Like, I don't know what else to say.

Like, I don't know what else to say. Like, genuinely, just like...

And these people obviously exist on the left,

but they don't have as much free reign,

frankly, on the left.

Um, yet.

Now, leftists are very dark and depraved and fucked up, too.

But at least there's like a bare minimum commitment to some kind of like law. Law.

Okay, I'm not talking about all right-wingers.

I'm talking about most right-wing communities I've come across are pretty fucked up.

And hey,

if I could stand to be corrected, I will be.

I'm not dogmatic.

I'm just telling you what I've seen in my four years of being online in this way, I've noticed that.

That anime shit is very dark and twisted. so yeah I mean

usually right wing

individuals I find are very

capable of being redeemed.

But right-wing communities oftentimes are not.

That's the thing.

Right-wing communities are oftentimes irredeemable.

Well, I think they're all irredeamable, actually.

Right-wing communities are irredeemable.

Right-wing individuals can be redeemed.

And that's, it's so ironic.

Leftist communities, you can at least splinter off from them and redeem that splinter, even if it's a minority.

But you don't even bother with the individual aspect, because why?

Leftists at least understand that Logos is collective and the

Wright doesn't take any

responsibility for Logos. It says

Logos is individual. So when the

Wright produces a disgusting, evil,

horrific community,

they're like, well, it's not my problem. I'm just

trying to make shit coin money.

So this is the problem, you know.

And, you know,

uh, The problem is insincerity. The problem is not being genuine, you know?

That's really the issue.

From the very beginning with the SJW shit and the political correctness stuff, the problem with that was always how insincere it was.

But, you know, look, in principle, I like the idea of an SJW.

I like it, in principle.

Like, abstractly, like a social justice warrior.

Like, it's fucking based.

What's wrong with that?

If you're not, like, cringe about it,

if you're not fake, if you're not insincere, if you're

not genuine about it, if you're straight up just like, you know, like you're actually

fighting for justice in a way that doesn't like give you the

pretence of being morally superior

but just committed to

you know

justice I think that's not a bad thing

at all

I respect feminists

of libs more than

Otaku. Yeah. See, you kind of get it. I respect feminists and libtards

more than crazy anime fucked up

right-wing. Honestly, the anime thing is the deciding

factor

but

can I tell you guys something

interesting about me

you know

oftentimes

I side with feminists

not because I'm on their side

but because their opponents

are worse

they're like well you think the feminists are correct and i'm like well

not really but I can't stand

their enemies

you know

it's like the enemy of my

the enemy of my enemy

is my friend

like I don't believe

in men's rights

I believe

I don't believe

in any rights

I'm against human rights

um and also there's something rights. I'm against human rights.

And also there's something kind of funny about it. You know, The reason I don't,

feminism doesn't bother me because I trust in the natural ability for women to to see the light

to be normal

like I don't have a problem with

I trust common sense will always prevail

you know

I trust common sense will always prevail, you know?

I trust common sense will always prevail.

That's the thing, you know.

Now, there's some cases of, like, total irrational extremism and resent genuine resentment of the sexes

which is a problem

for sure in society

but

but then you know just take things those feminists who genuinely have genuine resentment to men

they'll always expose themselves as slaves of the bourgeoisie in some other way.

You don't have to focus on the feminism.

You can just wait for them to confess their love of NATO and their love of Ukraine.

And that's it.

That's enough to write them off.

You don't have to entertain the sexual... By the way, American sexual team sports is the most retarded shit.

And it genuinely...

Always confuse me because... Are men right or are women right?

And I'm like

there's a war.

And it's like, so do we want to kill each other or what's going on?

Like there's literally like a war, right?

Between men and women.

And it's like, but isn't this this like a silly game isn't this like kind of a game like i remember

watching nicolodeon or that one spin off where there's like boys versus girls blue team versus pink team and it's like yeah it's a where there's like boys versus girls, blue team

versus pink team. And it's like, yeah,

it's a game. It's like a silly game. Whatever.

It's like... And then I remember

I was in kindergarten. We had like a boys

versus girls

team

sports thing. I don't know. But how can... i don't know

but how can i don't understand what is the meta symbolic framework under which

there can genuinely be a battle of the sexes

because look to not be not be overcomplicated I really

assume even with that before I knew anything about

philosophy or anything like I always assumed

innately that subjectivity

is sexed like they're

I don't like the thing

we're like well men and it takes a team

men and women need to work together

it's like I'm not trying to be wholesome

I'm genuinely saying like the nature

of subjectivity is that it's sexed

to be a man

is to imply a woman to be a man is to imply a woman. To be a woman is to imply a man. There's no like autonomy of the sex where it can be like a literal sovereign subject at war with the... That doesn't make...

Like what?

There's a woman country

and there's a male country.

Like, that's what I'm saying.

It doesn't make sense.

You know?

And,

um,

subjectivity is sexed.

So it's like,

basically men get the women they deserve and women get the men they deserve like that's the extent of the interrelation you know um men are the way they are because of women and vice versa.

Like, there is an interrelation.

How is that not common?

I'm not talking about something wholesome.

I'm talking about what is,

what should be like common sense.

I don't know. Well, like, well, which way is superior, the male way or the female way?

And it's like...

But you're either one or the other, so it's not a choice.

It's not like this is a battle of ideas.

It's just you don't have a choice in the matter.

Right?

It's like the whole thing about ageism.

Oh, there's a battle between ages.

What? You're, but like, you're, what do you mean? You're gonna, like, you're, like, you are,

you are, Grant, what's up? It's like, but there's a lifespan.

Like, how can there be a fight between an age?

Someone who's 30 and someone who's 20,

these are just different points in a given lifespan.

It's not like these are different borders on a country.

Like, I don't know, it's just like fucking stupid.

There's so much stupid shit.

Now, the generational war, understand that but um there's a lot of and i think a lot of it has to do with

you know lack of the ability to comprehend any kind of existence or subjectivity beyond the individual.

So this is the stupidity we're in.

You can't think beyond individuals.

And that's why I want to talk.

I wanted to talk about this.

Why does the USA have the worst bureaucracy in the world?

By the way, am I wrong?

The USA has the worst bureaucracy in the world.

Like, our government institutions are world-class in terms of how bad they are they're the worst in the world

anything that we do bureaucratically or publicly is shit the worst and then you think why, because we haven't taken responsibility for the fact that these things are necessary.

We're constantly punishing ourselves for the fact that we have a public sector, that we have bureaucracy, that we have public initiative, that things do need to be done

on the, at the expense of the taxpayer, or at the expense of the common, you know, the common

or on behalf of the common interest. And we resent it.

We're trying to individualize it as much as we can.

Oh, I'm just an individual.

I'm just an individual.

But nonetheless, it is inevitable that we are going to aggregate ourselves in collective

ways that do need to be managed to some

extent, you know, bureaucratically,

as much as I hate bureaucracy,

but to some extent,

it does become an impersonal thing, right?

And it's like,

we don't accept that.

So everyone is becoming a baby

we have a nanny state in America

that is affording every American the

the like babying them the illusion that they're just an individual and it's coming at the expense

of our common existence and our common good like everyone everyone has to just be like a little baby

and oh yeah you're a free individual

sure

and it's making it so that our actual

public institutions

and services

and whatever are just completely

dysfunctional and are totally

neglected and treated with so why does the DMV suck

why does anything government related suck because we have to be because we don't take responsibility

that these kind of things have to exist in the first place.

That's why.

And because of that, nobody – there's no art of public service or common service in America.

There isn't.

And you know, the best example of this is like, okay, we're all individuals with our little cars.

We're all motorists with our automobiles.

And then whenever you're in traffic, you kind of look around and realize how retarded our system is.

It's like, yeah, the price of everyone having to feel like they're like a special individual and their stupid car is that we just have like hundreds of thousands of these giant vehicles crammed together

in the most stupid way to get from somewhere that would take 10 minutes by a train. It's going to take two hours.

And, you know, it's like, this is already at scale collective, and there are collective consequences, not individual, collective consequences.

But because we're unwilling to take responsibility, we have a dysfunctional collective existence.

We have the worst bureaucracy in the world.

We have the worst transportation system in the entire modern world, right?

And

this is what I'm

talking about, okay?

China, which accepts and recognizes to some extent the reality of collective existence absolutely irreducible to individuals, there's such a flow of life.

There's such a flow of of day-to-day life

that it's just so masterfully

and elegantly facilitated

there's such a like eloquence to the facilitation

of collective existence in China.

And in America, it's just a blocked, constipated bureaucracy that is just too much of a baby to take responsibility for the fact that we do exist collectively.

You know, this is the problem.

We don't have a collective, we don't have a, we don't have a national logos that we all recognize.

And so we are a stupid country of big fat babies.

It's just the truth.

Did I ride the high speed rail in China?

I didn't.

I didn't.

We are not,

people say Americans are individualistic that's not true

I'm sick of hearing that

how can you have communism

in a country that's so individualistic

and at first I was like well

we'll combine communism with individualism

but you know what?

I'm done with that.

I'm done saying that, because I'm going to tell you the truth.

America is not an individualistic country or culture.

America is a collectivistic culture and country.

It just so happens to be that our collective ideal

is the fantasy of individualism individualism is a is an ideology upheld by collectivism in America.

Like, no, we're not an individualistic country.

We're a collectivistic country.

We're just deluding ourselves about our existence and thinking that we're just individuals,

at the expense of that collective existence, by the way. And the way that manifests itself is extremely dysfunctional bureaucracy because no one wants to take responsibility, horrific government institutions, horrifically dysfunctional government institutions, crumbling public infrastructure, nothing the government does can even work at all in any kind of way, and general societal dysfunction and decline. So, no, we're not individuals, okay? We are collective, absolutely, but instead of taking responsibility for that existence, we are coddled as babies

spoon fed the lie

that we are independent individuals. Our

independence is a lie.

It's a lie. Okay?

I'm sick of hearing about it.

I've never met an actual survivalist who'll truly be independent.

No one will do it.

No one will do it.

The people that try it do it for a year and then come back.

Nobody's independent in this country.

So I don't want to hear about individualism.

There's no such thing.

Now, what I love about the culture,

I want to be able to ignore people.

I don't want to talk to people.

I want to be anti-social. I want to be able to ignore people. I don't want to talk to people. I want to be anti-social.

I want to think.

I'm a thinker.

I don't want to...

Don't talk to me in public.

Well, if you know me, you can talk to me.

But when I'm at the gym and when I'm out and about, when I'm at the gym and when I'm

out and about when I'm walking

and when I'm going on a walk and I have this

beautiful vision and line of thought

and I'm so inspired and I'm thinking so deeply

I don't want a fat retard interrupt me going,

hi, let's talk about my shoelaces. I don't want to deal with that. I want to ignore

motherfuckers. So I am for silence and not having to you know a truly

collectivistic society doesn't have

that only our stupid individualistic

society has

I'm going to call it

you're forcing me to give you my emotional labor

because that's what it's just babies babies that need forcing me to give you my emotional labor.

Because that's what it's just babies, babies that need.

Oh, you're such a special individual.

You need to be talked to and you need to be validated all the time.

You know, I go to China and everyone's silent and I go to Russia.

They're all silent and nobody's bothering each other.

You see, it's like, I support that.

I support just let's ignore each other for real, you know.

And if we have to strike up a conversation, let it be meaningful and let it not be in a way that bothers us. For some reason, we say this country is individualistic, but this country per capita has the most annoying people who like to talk.

That's not individualistic.

And it's because you feel like a baby and you need validation.

Can you just get validation from the grand year and sublime aura of the state, like the Russian and the Chinese do?

And they don't have to go bothering pedestrians and talking all the time. When you're getting validated by Stalin

himself, looking down

that giant statue,

you need to go and bother people and get

validation,

you know, jip-yapping

talking to people

all the fucking time.

You can just fucking go about your merry way

and ignore the fuck out of everyone around you

in terms of this.

Now, if someone needs help,

you go and help them.

You don't even think.

You go and help.

I do that.

When I see someone next to me,

even at the gym, for example, I rarely pay attention to others, but when I do see someone who needs help, I don't think. I go and help. When I'm in public and I see someone needs help, I don't think

I go and help. That's the communist way.. I don't think I go and help.

That's the communist way.

I don't like the emotional shit,

this stuff.

Yip yapping.

I don't like that.

I don't like the gibbering.

I like to... I don't need it from others

and they shouldn't need it from me

you know

you know the

you know what

I have a problem with America

I say all these things

in the vein of let's improve it. Let's start improving it. Cultural revolution. Every conversation between strangers is ground zero for the discursive logos that endangers an empire.

So we will never create an imperial principle.

I'm using these terms in an ancient sense, not in the modern Leninist sense.

By imperial principle, I mean like a collective civilizational principle, right?

We don't, we're not creating that, right?

We keep hitting the reset button.

We don't cultivate it, so we liquidate it every time we get close

to it, and then whenever you meet

a stranger and yip yap with them,

the logos is being

born again.

And then, you know, you walk away

after talking for 10 hours

because people love doing that, and then you forget about it, and it's forgotten, and it disappears.

And the cycle repeats. It's like Groundhog Day, right? And what needs to happen is a cultivation of logos instead of honestly can i critique the party i'm

going to critique my own party because we can critique every you guys can critique me too for not

getting sleep or something right but? But let's all critique.

Let me critique the party.

So often I witness conversations.

People who are relitigating Marxism from scratch.

In front of me, like, let's go back to the basics of Marxism, Leninism, and Marxism, from scratch, every time I see you in person and talk to you.

Well, why haven't you, why have you not cultivated this already and and and stuck to a line

of reasoning or a line of of of education and or something you're that tells me you're not

cultivating anything it tells me that every time you want to show up to a meeting you're going to relitigate everything

from scratch and you want to relearn every you want to talk about everything from scratch

that's not a good sign because learning means there's a great deal you internalize that you do not have to talk about.

So if you've ever come up to me and you wanted to talk about theory or ideology or something like that,

and I've kind of like given you the cold shoulder, and I, once if that's happened to you,

because I've done that to so many of you.

The reason is because for my 10 years of being a Marxist, education means you internalize things that you don't have to make explicit you you you already it's like a it's a

common it's a given to you you know you can be critical toward it sure but the barrier to entry

for really for um opening a critical reexamination of a given thing you've learned is very very high

when you've actually internalized it as correct so for example I have internalized as correct a specific interpretation of the significance of socialism in one country, for example, right? Now, I can think continually be critical toward that, sure. But the barrier to entry to successfully challenge that interpretation that I have internalized is pretty high because it took a lot of education and reasoning and thinking and research and studying and so on and so on.

And in order to challenge it, there's a great deal that would have to go into that, you know?

So to really impress me and say,

Haas, I have this new idea I want to present to you.

You have to measure up to that.

Okay, you have to show me that you didn't just think about this in the shower yesterday, but you're thinking holistically. You're taking into account an integral accumulated traditional thought that we're calling Marxism, Leninism, and you're taking everything into account.

Now, I rarely encounter that, you know?

Yeah, Mike gets it.

To have an unorthodox view, you need to master the Orthodox view.

You have to understand the Orthodox view.

That's a good way of putting it.

Sure.

So,

ML is hard to master.

And you know what?

I don't blame you guys because let me just be honest.

It's hard to be,

it's impossible to be an ML without a meta,

without a meta,

um, an ML without a meta, without a meta, a meta commentary or a meta narrative.

By itself, Marxism, Leninism is, it's difficult to even, I mean, like today in 2025.

I mean, what does that mean today?

I mean, it's really difficult, if not.

And to be honest, most of you, I don't think I can master. Very few people have mastered it that I met. Very few people, if I could say they have.

Infrared is a meta-narrative, by the way, on Marxism. It's a specific way of interpreting it and situating it within a wider

meta-narrative, right? For sure it is.

But then also there's the issue of my book.

You know, my book is not done.

And every, so whenever I witness

your guys as ignorance or you guys getting something

wrong, I don't resent you for it.

I'm just like, it's my fault.

I haven't finished

my book and you guys just

you have really nothing to go off of.

Or you have things to go off of from my streams I've streamed a lot but like you know

my book probably will be

when my book comes out

for a lot of you it's going to be very new

and you're like oh I'm not

and then me it's well this was me the whole time.

I just, I resent you for having to write

this down. No, I'm kidding.

But, um...

So I don't blame you at all.

I blame myself, for sure.

You need to be an ML so long before you come in ML.

I don't know if I'd say that. I would say that to be an ML, you have to you absolutely have to

submit

to a certain process

a dialectical process.

You have to accept

this back and forth of what is, you know, you have

you have to get in the rhythm of contradiction.

That's how it really works.

And I think, you know, communism at the outset is a type of common sense.

The problem is not communism, convincing people to be communists.

So for most people, communism represents universal justice, morality,

even love, and all these kind of things. But there's a dialectic in the journey of their consciousness, where, okay, this is what communism is, and there's a very

convincing dialectic that 99.999% of people on Earth accept, listen very closely to me, okay?

Nobody should be ignoring what I'm saying right now.

Most people begin with communism.

But it's a dialectical process, a very, very compelling one, that makes 99.999% of people dismiss communism, right?

So at the outset, for most people, communism is good.

It's universal justice and morality and love on earth and it's great and whatever

but then there's a dialectical response

because this is the nature of everything in life is dialectical you see

so this is the first let let's say, premise,

and then there's a response, right?

So, okay, on paper,

but then in practice, it's an imperfect world.

So there's always a response that is actually

what compels people to reject communism now the logic of right-wing ideology and fascism is very different. Most people begin with, of course,

Nazism is bad. Of course, fascism is bad. And then later, they, through a dialectical process,

well, what I thought was bad actually is good.

So this is why fascism is just so compelling for most people, by the way.

Because there's an insufficient, the dialectic of anti-fascism in the liberal era.

Liberal anti-fascism, its dialectic is a bad infinity.

So fascism bad because fascism bad because fascism bad.

It's just this bad infinity of, it's with Norman Finglestine, he called it the

Holocaust industry. But it's in an industrial logic in terms of it's constantly beginning with

a kind of negation and it's continually perpetuating negation, negation, negation. Fascism bad, fascism bad, fascism bad.

And it has to become more and more creative in terms of its vilification of the fascism.

Star Wars and all these kind of things. This is why Hitler becomes like absolute evil in a liberal society because it's a bad, it's a dialectic of a bad infinity and so-called anti-fascism. But communism is very easy, very easy to, through a dialectical logic, to make unconvincing and impotent and weak in a liberal society.

Okay, beginning with the premise of communism, it's good.

But, you know, it's not a self-perpetuating logic of the good.

It is, okay, well, everything is good is also bad. This is dialectics, right? Something that appears good, of course, is bad. So how is communism bad? Well, it's the worst thing in the fucking world. Because something that appears good, but doesn't take into account the reality of its dark side or its bad side, it's like scary.

It's actually a category of horror.

It's like, that's why in horror movies, when you see like an uncannily smiling face,

and it's not, okay, well, nobody just smiles like that,

because there are other temperaments people

have and if you're not able to communicate

how you're interfacing with those other temperaments

you are effectively

like

you're teasing

the bad you're basically strip teasing you're teasing the bad.

You're basically strip teasing.

You're evil.

Like, I'm...

What kind of horrific evil,

scary monstrosity lurks behind that smile

is an open door.

Because it's not... it's not being communicated right whereas somebody who just kind of smiles faintly you're like well that person has a bad side of course we all have a bad side, so whether it's relatable. So communism is a similar

problem. It's presented as this unconditional good for most people, and then, okay, well, the good

always has a bad side. So in the case of communism, how are people taught the second

moment or second term of the dialectical process of consciousness confronting communism?

Well, first, it's either

tragedy, like, okay, it's good,

but it's too good,

and therefore only on paper

it's good, and then in practice it's a horrible,

or in practice it's a tragic failure.

Or in the case of the right wing trajectory, it's like communism presents itself as a telitubbies and Barney the dinosaur.

But that's actually a Jewish deception and trick and in reality they're going to

they're going to

kill 600

trillion white Christians

and torture

and rape and kill everyone. So

you know what,

an example of right-wing anti-communism is Pinocchio.

Have you seen the Disney movie Pinocchio?

So Pinocchio is promised An island

Of, what is it?

Fun Island, what is it called?

Where it's always playtime

And it's, you know, a bunch of children

And everyone's having fun

And there's toys everywhere or whatever.

Paradise Island, yeah. Paradise Island in Pinocchio. This is a kind of

quintessential right-wing anti-communist logic. Like Pinocchio is promised

Pleasure Island. Okay, it's Pleasure Island.

Now, not Peter Pan. I know I'm talking about.

It's Pinocchio.

Pinocchio is promised pleasure island.

And then, okay, it's too good to be true, but in reality, it's this horrific

exploitation where he's being turned into a donkey. You could say this is like a, you know,

in the mind of the bourgeois, American bourgeois,

this is like type of anti-communism.

Like, okay, the communists are promising you pleasure island,

and then they're going to exploit you,

and you're going to be a slave,

and it's going to be the worst thing ever.

So this is, but this is a dialectical logic

of, you know,

the good and the bad.

This is a dialectical logic

of the good.

And it's imperfection.

And it's fallenness.

You see?

Yeah, animal farms the same formula.

Sure.

So I want you to understand the structure of anti-communist consciousness.

The problem isn't that people...

America, communism has a bad rap.

No, it doesn't.

Communism does not have a bad rap in America or anywhere.

Communism actually has a good rap everywhere, and that's why it's ineffective in America, because it has too good of a rep reputation.

Most Americans associate communism. because it has too good of a rep reputation.

Most Americans associate communism with unconditional universal good, and that's why they don't accept it or think it's possible or or or take it seriously so to become a marxist leninist you don't already need to be a marxist leninist but there has to be an interesting

development at the level of that

process which not everyone

goes through it everyone hears

about communism

this thing that's so good

and then through a dialectical

process 99.999%

of them

settle on a specific

dialectical logic of, okay, communism

proposes itself as great, but in reality, it's bad.

So the second term of the dialectic and the encounter with communism, if you can somehow overcome what 99.999% of people fall into, which is this very compelling narrative of the good and its fallenness, that's how you become an ML.

That's how.

Okay, communism works on paper.

Okay, well, communism is good on...

Why can we not attain the good?

Every human being in their heart wants to attain the good.

This is what Plato said, right?

I'm pretty sure Christian theologians will say the same.

All human beings, they want, and Gnostics will say the same.

All human beings, they. Communism is the good

for everyone. No one says communism is in itself bad. Nobody thinks that. So communism is the good. If you

realize that the obstacles toward the attainment of the good or the realization of the good or not the realization i should rather say toward the um fulfillment okay let's say that fulfillment of the good.

If you realize that the obstacle is not reality itself or nature itself, but a more... but

and more

um

for example one of the things i think that work the most effectively for most pipelines is when people

say okay communism is the original thing. Okay, communism is justice.

It is the good.

Whatever.

Why can't this be fulfilled?

And then the first thing that I think sets people on the path of questioning anti-communist narratives is like, well, the reason we can't have this is actually because of US

interventions I mean the US the capitalist class and the US interventions that they brainwashed people, they attacked communist countries, they encircled them, they bombarded them. So that's why. There's another path people take, usually, which is the, well, the real one never was actually realized.

Real communism has never been tried. I think 95% of leftists, they go with that fork. let me can I put Microsoft paint

so uh this is the dialectic of anti-communism Okay, so let's go ahead and this.

Okay, so usually you have, um...

So this is the closed circuit, you know?

So, okay.

I gotta make this fit inside the box.

Okay, you know what?

I'll just make the box bigger.

So you guys can see better, right?

Okay, so everyone begins with this premise. right so 99% of people will go here, you know.

Um... You know, So remember Pinocchio, if you want to think about the Jewish deception trick or whatever, right?

So... or whatever, right? So.

Okay.

So communism does not have a bad rap in America, okay?

Forget the fucking Anglo box.

Fuck, I fucking use the square.

You're autistic.

I use a square and you have to, it's irrelevant.

Just ignore that, okay?

I'm using a fucking square for convenience sake.

Fuck sake.

It's like, don't overthink shit.

If I say Anglo Box box I'll say it

anyway look guys

this is the reason

communism struggles in America

it's not nobody's beginning with the premise that it's bad okay

everyone begins with the premise that it's good the problem is how they reconcile that premise

with its inevitable contradictions, okay?

Dialectics refers to a real, real nature of being, okay?

So this is a dialectical logic.

This is the circuit.

This is the closed circuit, the dialectical logic of anti-communism.

Okay.

And... okay and um

it's not it's not that

it's bad it's what's the response

you know so how do most how do people become mls or how do people become communists

well there there is forks so i'll give you a few forks okay so fork one let's just call this

fork one, let's just call this 85 percent i think most people start you i'd say 95 right this is how they response so this is a fork but this is also a response so

you see we can say like this is circuit one this is like what 99% of people right They go down this path.

This is circuit one, right?

This is circuit two.

This is another dialectical logic.

So you see, this is a pipeline.

See, when you can break with this fork, when you can break with

this fork

when you can break with this fork

you can get

some pretty interesting

pipelines going

but this is a closed pipeline

for sure this is closed

if you can somehow avoid this short circuit right here, you can set yourself on a path that's pretty interesting.

Because this is not a closed pipeline.

Well, this can end up being a type of brain rot.

Closed pipeline.

But usually, usually, um...

Usually what happens is that usually

usually let's say like 95% of the time this goes back here

okay so this becomes a close so this is the short circuit

the short circuit is always going to end So this is the short circuit. The short circuit is

always going to end here.

This is short. So even if you take this roundabout detour right here, there's a good chance you'll end up just back here, right, in the short circuit.

Okay?

But this is not a short circuit.

So if you can start forking, you can actually escape

the short circuit of the logos.

So look, I don't

have time to develop this in full.

I'd love to.

But

when I'm trying to...

Okay.

So this is the logic.

Okay, this is a logic.

It's not an ideal.

It's not a premise.

It's a logic.

This is the logic.

Communism's good, but it's...

It's...

But it's actually bad.

So this is the, this is a short circuit logic.

This is a fork you can take.

It's good, but it's never been tried.

Usually that's going to lead to another one, right?

Okay, well, there's other ways.

Actually, this can maybe lead to some more interesting things.

So, for example, if you avoid the short circuit and keep going down the rabbit hole further through the study of Marxism, for example, maybe you'll say something like this. I mean, Michael Parenti, I think. Some people, the Parenti pill, I think. So, for example, this is the Parenti pill.

Parenti pill, usually...

Usually, Parenti allows people to just go straight here, but a lot of time leftists also come to this way, right?

Yeah, these are Trotskyites and leftcoms and anarchists and all sorts of people are usually in the second box, and they usually short circuit.

But there's a, you can kind of go here as well. are usually in the second box, and they usually short circuit.

But there's a, you can kind of go here as well, you know.

Well, it wasn't given the proper chance because of U.S. imperialism.

Okay?

Let's say, I'll say 5%. Let's just say 5% to 15% of leftists, we'll say this, okay?

I should qualify, the ones that call themselves communist.

So, so this is one of the things, okay? And then, well, it wasn't given the proper chance, right?

Because of U.S. imperialism.

And then, you know, you go further, let's just say, I don't know, you know, I don't know, I don't know exactly where I would put the next stage, but maybe I'll end with the final stage. There's probably a lot more stages of the dialectic, right? Remember, dialectic is a tit for tat, you know?

But basically, eventually you realize that... You know, you get to the realization that, you know, you get to the realization that... You know, Okay, so basically you'll conclude with this,

and you'll say the, the obstacle of of communism and its true attainment is actually an imminent fact of all societies that this is what the division of labor actually is described by Marx's historical materialism. And all

communism is, is just the process of historical development itself, whereby this division

of labor develops, eventually developing toward, you know, a point where society somehow takes responsibility for its contradictory existence.

So this is how you get to Marxism-Leninism.

Marx-Lennon, it's literally Marx-Lennon, it's a contradiction, okay?

It's a logic of contradiction that you eventually accept by going through this basic pipeline with these basic circuits.

This is a short circuit dialectical circuit than most people end with.

But if you keep, I'm not, this is not a comprehensive, by the way, visual.

This is a very simple...

This took me like five seconds, right?

Eventually, what we call

Marxism-Leninism,

let's say,

Marxism-Leninism

becomes not one of these boxes

but kind of like the logic

of this circuit coming full circle

and you accept

and submit yourself to that logic

you know, materialist dialectics

dialectical materialism

where

Marxism does remain committed

to that kind of original premise

though of communism good

universal justice

the true fulfillment of morality and the goal, the riddle of history

solved. But only insofar as there's a recognition of the contradictory nature of that process, that the thing itself, which is good, communism, is traversed by this irreducible internal absolute contradiction.

And that this is the object of being. This is what being is. It is not an ideal. Okay, Marx says communism is not for us an ideal. It's the real movement. Well, this is why, Because communism is a logic. It's a dialectical logic, if you will. Communist consciousness is a dialectical logic. Anti-communist consciousness is also a dialectical logic. But communist consciousness is a dialectical logic, which is aware of its own dialectical nature as a logic. It's a logic which endangers a general a general

comprehension of the dialectic itself

you know and going through this process as a baby

leftist who's forking away from the

NPC 99% of people pipeline and you're forking away from the NPC, 99% of people pipeline, and you're forking away into these other pipelines.

Eventually, when you realize all the contradictions and whatever involved in the history of communism, and you start reading and you try to understand Marx Marxism and Marxist capital, and, like, you actually set yourself to the task of mastering that, you become aware of the dialectic itself. And by becoming aware of the dialectic, you actually understand what communism is in the first place and what it's referring to. It's not referring to a utopia. It's not referring to a perfect society. It's not referring to all problems disappearing. But the original

premise, which is an original commitment to the good, right, that remains. It's just,

see, it's so interesting and fascinating because the development of communist consciousness, and so it's like a kind of platonic or neo-platonic kind of process of development whereby you comprehend how you arrive at knowledge of the good.

What it takes to arrive at the true knowledge of the good

is not from an original naive premise of the good,

but the good kind of falling into the recesses of its real

premises and its real existence. And you know, James Lindsay, he calls Marxism, Gnosticism, the Gnosticism of the

the Gnostic

kind of

Gnosticism is just a kind

of like

blueprint

for all kinds of

consciousness in the West

if you talk

to the Chinese

about this,

dialectics is ingrained into their consciousness.

The Indians, dialectics is ingrained in their consciousness.

All these other civilizations take dialectics for granted.

So, Western consciousness

oftentimes needs to consult

with Gnosticism

to understand the dialectic

of knowledge.

Because Gnosticism deals

with, you know, the contradiction

between appearances

and this is

because Chinese

civilization is

5,000 years

old, okay?

What we call

Western civilization,

it's a process

of the development

of Manikianism

and Zoroastrianism and Judaism and Christianity and all these kind of hodgepodge, more primitive forms of the dialectical outlook, which are not refined to the point of constituting a definite civilization yet.

Whereas the Chinese have a 5,000-year-old civilization, they have an extremely refined dialectical outlook that has been cultivated for thousands of years.

Okay.

Is revelation not dialectics?

Yeah, of course, of course.

I mean, dialectics is everything, okay?

Everything, everything is dialectical, including dialectics itself, okay?

So,

ones if you found this to be insightful or fruitful in some kind of way. Marxism-Leninism is communism

Because Marxism

Leninism is a dialectical logic

It's an index of the application practically of that logic with respect to politics, especially.

But Marxism, you know how to, you should interface with Marxism, Leninism and your imaginary

in Alita Battle Angel

when she discovers

the lost technique of Panzer Kunst

or whatever it's called

fuck am I saying that right

Yeah Panzer Kunst Yeah Marks Fuck, am I saying that right?

Yeah, panzer kunst.

Yeah, Marxism-Leninism is panzer-kunds, okay?

That's what it is.

It's like a fucking martial art.

That's how you should think of it. It's a martial art.

Put it this way.

Communism is the goal of being a good fighter.

That's communism.

If communism is you want to be able to defend yourself, you want to be able to fight,

then Marxism-Leninism is Panzer-Kunst.

It's a martial art.

You understand?

This is how you should think of it.

Sounds Nazi.

I hate that response, man, because Alita Battle Angel is such a cool movie.

Alita Battle Angel is great because it's reactionary, but in a progressive way.

Alita is living in a disgusting

monarchy, or not Alita,

sorry, the people are living in a disgusting monarchy.

And I hate anime, but I like this new movie.

And there's nothing

people who sexualize it are weird

I mean I didn't even think of that

Alita is an angel

that came from the former USSR

and

this disgusting feudal shithold fallen world that they're living in, Alita has to rediscover the glorious USSR and the lost art of Marxism, Leninism, in order to overthrow the fallen, betrayed world of the corrupt, pedophile capitalist elite. That's how I interpret Alita Battle Angel, by the way.

Because, no, in all honesty, the the what is it called

the united martian republic

it's literally a republican

modern form of government

that is being

mythologized as something in the distant

past whereas today

is a corrupt feudal monarchy.

But what's fascinating about that is the usual trope in films is the opposite.

Usually, you revolting against the modern world to restore the monarchy, to restore some ancient birthwriter. This film is the opposite.

Alita is revolting against the postmodern neo-futalism on behalf of a more progressive Republican

ideal from the past that was forgotten and considered dead and defeated.

And the past thing is more advanced and futuristic, like, futuristic, like the armor she takes

from that crash ship.

So you can think of it like the Soviet Union.

Sure, why not? um um if you like the stream. I mean, I hope I want to have more

big brain streams with you guys

you know, and yeah.

So, so, show, show, show, show, show, show, show,

goodbye, everybody. I'm gotta eat. I'm hungry.

Goodbye.