🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

Oh, I was made for love,

I was made for love for all,

I was made for loving you,

baby, you were made for loving me,

and I can't get enough for you baby. Can you get enough for you, can you get enough for me. I was made enough for you, baby. Can you get enough for me?

I was made for loving you, baby. You are made for loving me.

And I can't get enough for you, baby.

Can you get enough for me?

But you are made no, ooh, I can't get no.

So I can't get no.

So I can't get no. I'm who's made for loving you, baby. No, no, no, no,

do, no, no, no, no, no,

do, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I was made for loving you, baby,

you are made for loving me.

And I can't get enough for you, baby.

Can you get enough for you baby can you get enough for me.

Ooh no no no no no no no

and I can't know for you baby can you get a job for you, baby.

Can you get a job for me?

I was made for love in you, baby.

You are made for love in me.

And I can't get enough for you, baby. Can you get enough for me?

You will make a little, I can't get enough.

So I can't get know. Oh, I can't know.

I was meant for loving you,

baby. I would make for love for you baby you are made for loving me and I can't get enough for you

baby can you get enough for me?

Oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,

no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,

no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,

and you, baby, can you get enough for you, baby.

Can you get enough for me?

I was made for love for you, baby.

You are made for loving me.

And I can't get enough for you, baby. Can you get enough for me?

You're only.

Can't get enough.

So I can't get enough. Oh, I can't get enough.

I was made for loving you,

baby.

Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I was made for love in you,

I was made for you,

I was made for loving me. I was made for loving you baby you are made for loving me and I can't get enough for you

baby can you get enough for me me. I was made for love in you, baby.

You are made for love in me.

And I can't get enough for you, baby,

can you get enough for me?

You are made a new one man.

I can't get no.

So I can't get no.

So I can't get no.

I'm who's made make for loving you baby. Fly with me like a rainbow butterfly kiss me and I will sing the angels lullaby

Won't you be light with me like a rainbow butterfly

Do you leave and you won't see all the colors in the sky?

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh What's a dieter, you're all? It's a de la. It's a lot.

It's a day.

What's the day you're all?

It is a lot of the law.

We have a lot.

I have all. As the D'Amatou,

to be on the same, he, as good to him.

Bion as we can show,

what's a pech on the line.

L'e'n't you're going to be My TUR-O-Doh-T-O-Oly, yeah, yeah, yeah, fly with me like a rainbow butterfly, kiss me and I will sing the angels on a buy.

Won't you be light with me like a rainbow butterfly

Believe and you won't see all the colors in the sky Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, uh, uh,

michu nichu nichu nichu nichu nichu nicho

a s

a s

a s

a hmah mahhoo I'm gonna'er, or another I, because I'm gonna'er, because I'm Fly with me like a rainbow butterfly

Gives me and I will sing the angels follow I'm going to be a memory of a your paid in my desire,

to save him. You can see from me despair. Oh, uh, uh, uh, oh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, I'm not.

Yeah, I'm in the year.

Oh,

Yeah, uh, uh... Oh, I'm not. Oh, oh, I'm going to. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, and oh, oh, oh, Oh, I'm going to go.

Oh, oh, oh, oh,

Oh, oh,

Oh, oh, Oh, I'm going to go.

I'm going to go. Oh, Hight, only for life, our lifestyle Hollywood life.

We're not a child, I'm going to be right, only for life.

Our lifestyle, Hollywood life.

We're in a stye,

rick, ever is right. E- got a brat and they were in the mirror

Only for life, only for life, only for life, only for life, only for life, only for life. life. It, it, it, it, it, e.

Heh, hah, eh, eh, eh, hight hight,

only for life.

U hunse life

our life on the life on the I'm over a site It's gonna bar to dive it into my life

I'm gonna go,

I'm gonna go for me a ticket to me for me

To me for me to hight yeah

I will hoo hoo I'll hoo hoo

I'll hoo hoo And I'll hoo

take you to the fait dain dain Cough me a ticket to me need for it but hoi to nigh line

only for life

only for life

only for life only for life Hollywood

only for life only for life. life. like.

Hollywood.

Hollywood.

I've been hoi you not your line sign.

I've been hoi and not your line sign.

I've been hoi and not your line sign.

I'm hoi and not your line sign.

I'm I've been hoi and not your line sign. I will be hoy in a line sine

the cap put tive my air was clean

trag the brain

the brain

nreel for me early days bricke.

Can't I've left up in a fen jest in the fen jest of me nah nahoeing Dauphine and even Caves and Dixon the oven Jots even he'll be sure

but just me segück the gosh was

but just me up for a set up,

pachcom, that's for you and gumsen love

kauf me a ticket in the fai hai,

say,

Sai hai, Sai hai, Sai hau.

Hai ha only for life.

On the life, side, Hollywood life.

Is an ech Stein,

Echrech, but it's life.

He's got a bridal dive it into my life.

Hisech, k me right Pise Klein.

Gough me a ticket to the fai-hai.

I'll be hooch with us your line.

Coffee I take it to me faines,

I'm going to be fine-hain.

Only for life, only for life,

only for life, only for life.

Hollywood.

Only for life,

only for life.

Hollywood. I know a place a place where we can't dance all my door

Come take my head when the night's up

Come take my head when the night's gone gone

We stay away from the still done Yeah from past ever Yeah, this must be the place

to attack with the force of the base.

Recets!

Resets! Reset.

7 is the number.

7 is the number. 8 wonder.

We got the sound, we're raving fast.

Enjoy the night, it might be all ass.

Wizards on the keys and me on the wire.

Believe what I say, we are still on fire.

Because I am to the early on it.

You can be sure it's the final warning.

I'm raw, super sharp, gonna make your body rough.

Tik-drop, got the drop, rave on, never stop.

I know the place, a place where we belong, where we can dance all night long.

Come take my head, and it lights I've go, please stay away.

From there I still go.

When nothing goes right, go there!

Go there! As we step in the door we cross panic even like the last few minutes on the

Titanic. Come on! Give it up. Oh, I know the place. Ahh!

Oh, I know the place.

What I'm going to be?

What's for living in our place today? Where we're not breaking the day,

Oh my God.

Come take my head

when the night's so gone, we stay away

from the still done.

Waste your youth as we cause fire in the booths.

Yeah. He had my kites Klein only for life.

Our lifestyle Hollywood life. Only for life life life life

Hollywood life

Wies isn't the right

over it's right

it's right it got up right

to dive it in semis right

only for life You're not. You're not. I gotta say this.

say this.

Whitter's down for everybody.

Down for me, it's down for you, down for the whole fucking world. I got a message to tell

Elon Musk. Elon Musk is your website, you can do whatever the fuck you want with it, you

own it. Let me tell you something, Elon Musk. Do not fucking shut Twitter down until I finish my fucking book and can put it out there.

After I finish my book, after I put it out there, after I change Western Marxism as we know it,

that's when you can shut Twitter down.

Let me do this shit right now, man.

I'm not going to let these Fishers win, man. That's okay. This is going to be the big breakthrough. I've dedicated my

all to this. Trust me I have guys. I'm physically sick because of it because I'm so

fucking exhausted but I'm still marching through.

I'm still marching through anyway.

Part of the sickness might be that I went to Costco today and got their all beef hot dog.

I don't know if that made me sick.

But let's just say

I've been round the world and back

10,000 years past in history and back

Let me tell you guys what's up. We're not we don't have Twitter we're not gonna be able to cover the news using any Twitter so it's just

going to be us today you understand but that's okay even though it's just gonna be

us that's not gonna make this stream any less fruitful and eventful.

Motherfuckers, I've been gone for two days. I've been sporadically streaming throughout the week.

But don't you for a goddamn second think I don't have a good reason. And you're going to see that good reason when my shit comes out.

And then you'll say, ah, that's the fucking reason.

Don't be thinking I ain't got shit to talk about either because I do. I got some things on my mind.

Interesting things going on as well. By interesting things I mean to say.

We might see a Slavoy Jizizizek-Nickland debate, February 2024. That is if Nick Land agrees to it, which I hope he does,

because the world needs to see this.

The world needs to fucking see this. We are gonna watch this. We are gonna watch this.

Oh my God dude we have the crossover of a century going on.

We're going to watch these together. We're going to watch these together.

Straight up, if you find it boring, you're a fucking fucking retard low IQ I don't give a

fuck because we already apparently have some clips of zizek throwing shade

at Mr. Land and this is like Christmas for me because I've been waiting 10 years

for these people to collaborate not not collaborate I've been waiting like 10 years for these people to collaborate. Not collaborate.

I've been waiting like 10 years for these people

to talk about each other.

And I'm prepared to be disappointed, don't get me wrong.

But I've been waiting for this for this crossover for a very long time okay and oh

boy I don't know where to begin but this is I'm gonna be real with you guys right now

Twitter's down Twitter please don't come back up because I actually want to watch this.

Because this is something I would watch on my spare time.

Okay, this is typically not something I would watch for the stream because I assume most people

are fucking too retarded.

But this is something I'd watch on my spare time

and we're actually gonna watch it together.

And yeah, I'm gonna talk about the whole Trump,

the whole Trump stuff about Trump being thrown in jail or whatever and

Actually, we'll slight we'll save the ziezek stuff for later I guess because I guess we do have some immediate pressing matters to cover

Before we do that

But we'll save that for the end of the stream. For now we can actually talk about

what's going on in Colorado. I don't think I'll be too long either and I'll give you my

thoughts on it. So the Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that because of Trump's role

in fomenting an insurrection during January 6th, quote unquote,

he is going to be disbarred.

I don't know if that's the right word.

He's going to be prevented from appearing on the ballot

of the Republican primary in that state. Now this is the recipe for a civil war. I know that the

phrase civil war was trending on Twitter, but I want to take credit for

something and I want you guys to be my witness for this. I'm not a magician. I'm not a

magician. I don't have access to special powers. But I do feel as though I have a

vision in terms of intuition. Cohearing many different things and putting them

together and drawing a conclusion

based on a more holistic perspective, a far-sighted perspective, right?

Did I not tell you shit was going to go down in the Rocky Mountains?

Did I not fucking tell you shit was going down there? Because as it happens, I'm gonna call it,

I usually yell into this mic as it happens, okay?

The Colorado Supreme Court is the one doing this.

This is happening in Colorado.

It's gonna happen in the West. doing this is happening in Colorado.

It's gonna happen in the west. It's gonna happen out west. I said this, all right? I said this is where shit's gonna happen to happen.

And I was right. You didn't believe me before, start believing me as time passes, the

Rocky Mountains is the future of American communism. Put it this way, if American communism

of the 1930s was based in the Midwest Chicago and so on and so on.

If that was based in the Midwest, the Workers Farmers Party and so on.

2036 is going to be centered in the Rocky Mountains region. It's going to be centered in the Rocky Mountains region.

It's going to be centered in the Western territories

where the majority, not the majority,

where a bulk of the land is federally owned,

I don't know if it's the majority or not,

where it's sparsely settled,

where a nomadic step population currently resides,

where Elon Musk cyber trucks are going to be driving around.

It's going to be a futuristic, it's going to be like a death stranding, right?

This is where the future of 2036 is going to be.

Believe it when I tell you, okay?

The first, can I tell you guys something?

2036 came to me as an artistic vision. It didn't come to me as like a blueprint

based on a mechanical formula. It was an artistic vision and a big part of that artistic vision for

reasons I just don't care to explain were the

salt flats of Utah.

I envisioned vehicles driving over the salt flats of Utah, military vehicles, and a great

battle occurring there. I didn't call Coloradans that, shut up dude. I'm saying

it's that fucking region, okay? The Rocky Mountain region, that whole... I circled it on the map. That's where shit's going to be, all right? And this is one of the things where I don't care to reason about it. I just kind of have the feeling and I just choose to go with that if that makes sense.

And I'm not saying like I received some prophecy or I'm not saying that.

I'm literally saying like I made it up.

But I didn't make but I don't think I made it up I feel like I can't

explain shit to you guys I got a sixth sense you know I have this sixth sense where

it's not that I made it up completely it's that I detect it and this is kind of what I'm writing

about a little bit where does my power to do this come from it's not a

supernatural power it's just I happen to see things very coherently and bring a lot of things together.

Right?

And then later you can you can see how they I am of the view that human beings naturally everyone has this

everyone has this ability naturally like everybody has the ability to

understand where the wind is going you do it's just like what David

Lynch says you know David Lynch he was giving a speech like David how do you come up with

the shit you do and he's like he's said some weird shit about like well the ideas are

just like bubbles and it's like a dream and you have to let it just come to it's just but but the you read between the lines of that is that we human beings

are already confronted with the entire intelligence the collective intelligence of mankind

and we have to use brain power to make that explicit and

actually connect the dots ourselves, right? But it's still there whether we use the

brain power or not. Does that make sense? Like our stream of experience already opens us to the concrete hole of our existence,

historically, the winds of history, the world spirit, is already immediately in front

of us, right?

And the reason people can't see it is because they overthink it. They overthink it and they think too logically without just, I can't explain, it's a very American thing. I'm not a magician, right? Don't don't get these funny ideas that

Taz is a that I'm some kind of profit or something. You know, the reason I'm able to predict

shit the way I am the reason I'm able to see with the clarity that I have is not because of

It's not because I have magical abilities. All right? I'm just kidding

But anyway, it's everything's unconscious, right? Everything's

about the unconscious for real. Like I'll give you examples of the Zir, he's really big into this occult stuff. He's really big into this occult stuff. I don't know if I've told them this in private, but I'm like, everything's on the surface. Accultism is not you being a magician in the dark and

getting all this. That's so much energy. That's not what it is. A magician is

exactly like Twin Peaks the Return where, what's his name again?

Fuck.

What is Dale Cooper's other Toulpa called?

What was that called again?

It was a different name.

Not the evil coop, but the other Tulpa. The other Tulpa. What was that called?

There's nobody nobody fucking remembers that

Dougie Jones exactly holy shit a real magician is like Dougie Jones

straight up you know the scene where Dougie Jones goes into the

Casino and like he just starts like fucking getting jackpot on every single slot machine and

he's like he's completely blissful while he does it that's what it is that's

how you do it all right that's how you roll that's that's how you do it. That's how you roll. That's how you do magic. And if you don't get it, you don't fucking get it. You're overthinking it. Straight up, you're overthinking it. You know? Like I'm not saying you have to be clueless and oblivious. You have to keep everything in the back of your mind,

but you have to channel that into a seamless opening, right? Where things just come to you naturally. I can't fucking explain that to you, right?

Anyway, no, I'm not saying you should physically move to the Rocky Mountains. I'm saying you should stay where you are

and start paying attention to that region and its economic significance, its political significance, and its

historical significance, because shit is going to go down from that region, right?

But everything's on the surface is what I'm trying to say, you know? That's really what I'm trying to say. Anyway, I don't know exactly how I got to this. Oh, the Trump thing, of course.

Yes, Civil War will be the result of this. There's no doubt about that in my mind.

And I'm going to tell you some outcomes that I think would be really boring, right?

One outcome that I find really boring is that another Republican gets elected and all this gets buried and Americans are

retarded enough to fall into a George W Bush 2.0 patriotic war yeah yeah and it's just

fascism right so that's the fascism part one, sorry version one

fascism. Version two fascism is Trump actually does get elected but he

doesn't get elected on on the back of some populistic movement he gets elected because the gopee

and the democrats decide

hey

this is not worth a civil war

we're just going to give trump emergency powers wink wink and work with him. That's the biggest

fucking thing we have to be fearful of. Trump is not horrible by himself but Trump

combined with the swamp is a fucking disaster, all right?

And specifically the GOP because it didn't really work out that well during his four-year presidency,

but if the GOP falls in line behind Trump and

anoints him as a dictator with emergency powers, just know Trump was a fed

from the start because that was their whole game plan which was to engineer a

false political crisis in order to give dictatorial powers to the

regime to circumvent our constitutional rights.

And I mean that earnestly as a MAGA communist, I mean it earnestly.

We are not afraid to keep Trump in check and no we don't

fucking worship Trump. We don't worship Trump. We don't worship Trump. We are very

much prepared to oppose Trump if it comes to the point where he decides to allow himself to be a tool of the

establishment. Now this is not the situation right now to the extent of

my knowledge but be vigilant of these things. That's all I'm trying to tell you.

Be vigilant of it.

There's no way they could have predicted that far.

Maybe you're right.

You could be right.

You could be right.

That's possible.

I'm not discounting the possibility

uh... I'm not discounting the possibility that things are unfolding not a truly

antagonistically it's not a false thing. But I don't trust Trump, you should not trust Trump, but we

will independently assess the situation ourselves. If it comes down to Trump versus the world, we will support him.

If it's Trump versus the world, we will support him.

If it's Trump versus the entire GOP and the Democratic Party,

and there's no segments of the ruling class that go behind him.

Then we will be very clear about our approval of his political existence, of his political significance, but we will do it from an

independent perspective because we're not here to facilitate the

dictatorship of Donald Trump. We are here to see to the establishment of the dictatorship of the working class, the dictatorship

of the party of the working class.

And it is to that party we owe our loyalty to.

In the last and final instance. But we will not discount the

possibility of joining together in a popular front that includes Donald

Trump if it if and under the circumstances I just described if it's him versus both of the

duopoly parties and he's on his own we will come to his aid and the aid and

and and we are already with magga by the way we are already with Maga but we are not

automatically loyal to Trump we do so from the perspective of an independently

articulated

proletarian consciousness from the perspective of scientific socialism backed by the history and tradition of the immortal science of Marxism-Leninism.

Know that our authority and our tradition is irreplaceable. No single personality, no

one like Trump or anyone else can erase the necessity of internalizing, of respecting, of upholding. the of the tradition of Marxism, Leninism, and of world communism, which we seek to apply in the American context.

So let's be clear, they accuse us, some accuse us of tailism. We have no

Tailist bone in our body. It's not us who are growing tales. It's the people who abandon humanity as a whole. They're the ones themselves growing tales.

Don't throw that tail is on us when you're a bunch of

fucking Democrats anyway. We will assess the situation independently and act

accordingly. We don't know anybody our fucking loyalty. Understand that.

Understand that our priority is the formation of an independent party of the

working class and it is from the headquarters of the working class as an independent

organ as an independent organization

That we will decide

Our relationship to Trump's political existence. We won't do so individually. We won't we're not Trump's fan club. We are not Trump's fan club.

We have complete independence from Trump and anyone else.

We will create the headquarters to articulate the interests of the working class and yes

Be the Vanguard as the most advanced section of the proletariat

To articulate correctly the class consciousness and the overall orientations and aims of the

proletarian class. Yes it will be the party that does that. Yes the party will be an exceptional minority. a dictatorship of the working class.

And he say, so you want a tyranny where a party lords or...

No, we want to reduce the government to the bare minimum.

As far as government is concerned as a coercive monopoly on violence, we want to reduce it.

We want to pulverize it into a bare minimum, a bare minimum which is simultaneously emanating grand and awesome power fueled and charged by the faith loyalty

belief of the masses and it will be the masses who attend to their own affairs having

their own guns having their own militias having their own affairs, having their own guns, having their own militias,

having their own local forms of organization, but it will be the center and the state

dictatorship which will be the culmination of that power.

Simplified, yet great great awesome and powerful powerful like the power of

the kings of Babylon and sumer and Assyria and the powers of the

of the pharaohs

so let me clarify where we stand as to the matter of our relationship

to the elections in 2024. The only elections that we personally are going

to concern ourselves with are the elections internal to the party of the working class and

our eyes are set on the CP USA to that end.

But we may and we are preparing for a scenario in which if the CP USA plays dirty tricks

to circumvent its own protocols of democratic centralism and prevent the elections on a fair basis,

we will do what Maga is threatening to do to the US government.

We will do that to the CP USA.

If they want to steal our election, if Joe Sims wants to be Joe Biden and

steal the CP USA election, we will have our own January 6th within the CP USA.

We will have our own organization and yes, yes, mark my words, our own party.

Because remember, for now, the organization that I'm launching, which evidently is going to be launched in January,

but the organization that I'm launching is not going to be a party.

It's going to be rendering the party superfluous in many ways.

But there may come a point in which we declare this is the party, period.

And we will act in the capacity of a party.

It will be a decentralized organization which bears, I'm not going to name it.

I'm not going to tell you what the plan is. You'll see when we announce it.

But yes we have plans for 2024. We have plans for 2024. No, those plans do not amount to

campaigning and canvassing for some fucking politician. Our plan is to build the backbone of a working class party.

And we will build it with our hand.

We will build it with our work and our labor.

And that's what I can promise you for 2024.

I'm not going to be some faggot conservative sitting here and just

commentating about Trump oh president Trump oh president Trump oh

president Trump oh bardin that Oh President Trump, I'll buy it this, I'll buy it in that.

And then a scandal comes out and turns out their pedophiles.

I am not here to commentate upon happen. I am here to speculate

and gamble about what's going to happen. I am here to seize fate itself. This much I can't

this much I can promise you.

When my book comes out you you're going to understand why I postponed launching the organization to finish this book.

When you look at the title, you're going to say, ah, that's why.

It's perfectly on the nose. you're going to fucking understand.

We will be the standard bearers of a new America.

An America whose capital is not going to be in fucking Washington, D.C.

But it's going to be in fucking Salt Lake City, Utah.

Or somewhere else, I don't know. Don't quote me on that.

We'll move the capital to the Rockies.

Like the Mongols, move the capital of China to Beijing.

Like the Baltimore's moved it to Moscow. we're going to move it to the Rockies.

Of course we're Mormons. Of course we're Mormons.

Mormons, Mormons who look ahead to the future.

Mormons who follow in the footsteps of destiny,

not looking backwards whatsoever with each step that they take.

Not that destiny.

Yes, we're Mormons.

We will be riding cyber trucks across the salt lakes and the salt flats of the Rocky Mountains surrounded by these mountains.

For what purpose I don't know. But it's just a cool aesthetic isn't it? Anyway.

I'm not going to concern myself with what's going on in a minute? What's going on?

I mean, shut up.

What's going on? We know what's going on.

The empire is collapsing.

That's not enough.

We're here to pick up the pieces to be the new standard bearers.

What's in store for America is the same thing that was in store for the ancient Mesopotamian

city of Aruk.

It's the same thing that was in store for the city of Baghdad when the Mongols were descending upon it.

Heaven has grown weary of the excessive luxury and arrogance of Washington, D.C.

I'll tell you that much. The nomads are coming.

The nomads are coming.

The nomads are coming.

The cities will surrender or be destroyed.

The cities will surrender or be destroyed.

We will besease New York City,

and they will submit or they will be destroyed. We will be

besieged Los Angeles. The crackheads must stop sittingitting in the streets, but most importantly, all the Hollywood celebrities

must give up their Hollywood mansions to the soldiers of the future Red Army. We need a place to stay in

headquarters and all that. Anyway we're engaging in fantasy fiction right now.

Fiction which may have granules of truth for the future.

Granules of truth.

It's not going to be the complete.

It's not going to be a fantasy.

It'll have granules, not even grains,

granules of truth. Granules.

yes granules.

The fishermen will submit.

The fishermen will be allowed to fish, yes.

But they will not be allowed to consume so much fish oil and fat to the point where they

decide that it's okay to engage in cannibalism and in slavery and human sacrifice. They need to not have that huge fish-fat oil festivals that they do,

not going to be allowed. We're going to promote a healthy diet, which includes not only fish, also poultry and even some beef maybe.

Unless you're Hindu.

A well- balanced diet.

A well balanced diet! A well balanced diet!

Anyway... Anyway, the inside jokes were getting out of hand.

They're getting quite out of hand. Nuke the Pacific? No, we're not going to nuke the Pacific. No, we're not going to nuke the... Anyway...

But what the fuck is going on in like Washington State, really, you know?

Once a fucking Bill Gates, Microsoft...

Yeah, we're going to watch the Zeezeg video, okay?

Hold your damn horses and chill the fuck out.

Holy shit.

Okay.

Now I'm going to give you my overall thoughts in all seriousness.

Seems like shit's going down 2024.

Everything's going down. There's going to be wars in the Middle East.

That ain't going nowhere

and is going to be political instability at home

now what precedent i mean we've seen this coming it's coming it's coming it's

coming the fact the Colorado Supreme Court and I'm gonna tell you it's not even

necessarily a conspiracy hegemony doesn't work that way It's not some guy sitting in a room.

Maybe it is, I don't know, but I don't think it's a group of people sitting in a room plotting everything, right?

I don't suspect that's what's going on.

I suspect this is what's going on.

At the Colorado Supreme Court, the judges there,

who's in a very restricted media ecosystem.

They're going on Libtard Twitter with Ukraine flags, and they're just living in a different reality.

And then there's interns there with glasses and Starbucks, hi, my pronouns are bad,

nah, and they're just living in a different fucking reality, right? And then they're part of this network of like

NGOs and volunteer activism groups and think tanks and it's a completely

isolated ecosystem and they're reading the New York Times and then it's so easy for this

judge to be like you know what we're gonna be different we're gonna be

different in 2023 we're gonna be different and we are deciding that Thomas Jefferson was a black woman.

No, that's a different thing.

They said we're going to be different and we've come to the decision

that Kim Kardashian is Time Magazine's man of the year.

Oh, that's a different thing.

Okay.

Well they said, we're gonna come to the decision, we're gonna be different this time.

We're not gonna let Trump, we're not gonna let Trump on the ballot.

You know?

And it's like they thought it was such a bold and brave move.

They're like brave.

It's like a Saturday Night Live.

You know what those pathetic moments?

When Saturday Night Live tries to be serious, like when they did that disgusting shit for Kyiv.

They fucking pronounced it with K Y IV and candles,

and they had some fucking retard sing.

It was so serious.

Ukraine.

So serious.

And this was like on the eve of Vladimir Putin's invasion, right?

When they get serious, right?

This was another moment where the cast of New York Times got serious.

We are going to get rid of Trump on and this this is kind of how it manifests itself the

division I mean and I'm not saying that's the class that there's no class

element to I'm not saying I'm saying the opposite I'm saying this is how it

manifests in people's cultural consciousness, right?

The class significance is absolutely clear.

Look at the institutions.

Look at the universities.

Who funds the universities?

Follow the money.

It's literally that simple.

The think tanks, the NGOs and so on the

media ecosystems that place people in these contexts so yeah you can have a

clear class analysis of why this is but it's it's very easy for me to understand why the Colorado Supreme Court

effortlessly came to the decision that it did.

And regardless of what you think about the matter,

regardless of what your opinion is about the matter, right?

One thing is absolutely clear.

What's clear is that political power in the US no longer resides in the constitutionally sanctioned

institutions. I'm not making a normative judgment, a moral judgment.

People's political consciousness and people's political loyalties,

the institution and organ of political power

is no longer what's on the surface.

It's this whole ephemeral, seemingly intangible world of a

meta-partisanism, right? It's like beyond, it's like a meta-politics in a way, way right and the natural result of that is going to be a

civil war because if our political institutions cannot properly contain the

differences that we're seeing in this more intangible and

how do we put it more fluid realm of political consciousness when there's such an

acute distinction between those two things I've said this before there's such an acute distinction between those two things.

I've said this before there's going to be a collapse of the political system.

I'm not just saying this because I'm all we all want to collapse.

Yeah, of course we do, but I'm telling you there's no way out of this.

I mean unless the Constitution is amended. Of course we do, but I'm telling you there's no way out of this.

I mean, unless the Constitution is amended or the way the government works officially

works like a corporate PR firm, then that's the, I mean, look, put it this way. if you want to know what's foreboding the

destruction of a government pay attention to the like how was corporate

governance work and look how different that is to how our government works right Now this seems like a retarded thing to say

because businesses have always worked differently

from government, right?

But in today's world, corporations also assume

relative roles of governance, which is usually about gatekeeping access to the company and

consumers and how big tech works and so on. And compare that to how the

institutional government works. The institution of government seems extremely archaic in comparison.

But that difference, it's not just a difference between government and business.

There's a difference between the form of civilization that we're entering into and the government which is supposed to be the

supreme power of that civilization. Like the form of civilization that we've entered is no longer

compatible with the institution of statehood that we have.

It simply isn't.

The civilization which characterizes America right now,

no longer compatible with the superstructure. The base is no longer

compatible with the superstructure. It's literally that simple. It's literally that

simple. The Supreme Court judge who decided Trump is going to be not allowed on the ticket.

He was not like some, some like, you know, some judge kind of like focused on the sanctity of the Constitution.

No that was like a judge who was kind of like you know what?

This is a year for trans black people like I'm not I know it's not necessarily that

but I'm saying like this was this was them giving a

nod to something clearly outside the state and I'm not saying Trump is a

constitutionalist because he's not he's obviously not but I'm saying both sides see fit to operate in a both

sides view political power in a way that instrumentalizes the Constitution and instrumentalizes the form of

government have to the point where both Trump and the Democrats are like

okay how do we like get a loophole around this shit you know what I mean and you could say that was true since

FDR but I think it's a little different now you could say oh that's FDR that's Richard

Nixon right and I'm like yeah but it but it was never so FDR, that's Richard Nixon, right?

And I'm like, yeah, but it was never so explicit.

It was never, at least there was this like veneer back then.

There was this aestheticization of American democracy into an ideology, which I think covered up that

discrepancy for a long time. But I think that precisely that ideology has

collapsed. And I think that's what we're talking about. Like the ideology of American

democracy collapsed and now we can see very clearly

the the irreconcilable difference between the base and the superstructure you know? So, yeah, you know? Civil war is not something we're going to we're saying to be sensationalist

to exaggerate or to kind of blow things out of proportion civil war is something

we're talking about

realistically like yeah that this is gonna happen

this is straight up it gonna happen you know we're not trying to be drama You know? We're not trying to be drama

queens or whatever. We're not trying to blow things out of proportion. It's

straight up going to happen, you know, and like it or not, it's going to happen. I can't believe this but Twitter is still down.

Twitter is still down by the way it's pretty fucking crazy. Anyway guys, um, yeah, I get the thing being trapped by

imagination, but I'm saying civil war is gonna happen. And if it's not gonna be a

civil war it's gonna be a fascist dictatorship on an explicit level.

But this whole thing of like...

The cynical Washington DC intern walking around and hide heels who's like, I just watched House of Cards. I'm going to be just

like House of Cards. I'm going to be just like Sircy Lannister from Game of Thrones. I'm going to be like my favorite character

from the TV show. I don't get a fuck about the Con station. I'm going, that's not sustainable. You know what I mean? Like I get that everyone thinks there's such like a cynical like like cynical like like cynical Machiavellian. Oh yeah, I don't believe in the system. I just manipulate yeah, but eventually the system's gonna have its revenge on you. See, systems don't like

being neglected for that long. The Egyptian goddess called Maat, if I'm

pronouncing it correctly, she was the incarnation and personification of

balance and order and a basic minimum of the commensurability of formal

relations. You see Maat can only take shit for so long.

Eventually, Maat is going to bite you back in the ass.

Okay, you can't do that forever.

Eventually, I'm saying what I'm trying to say in so many words,

is that eventually there's going to be consequences at the level of the system itself.

This whole thing of coasting by and just this cynical consciousness doesn't last a cynical consciousness

forebodes the destruction of

the thing you're cynical about in the first place

this whole convenient kind of attitude of like oh yeah this is like a movie is like a

yeah well you know what eventually movies become real fucking life you know

eventually the movie becomes real life right and it's not a movie anymore it's the fucking real world and it has

consequences and you're gonna have to be responsible for the world you live in

instead of just being cynical about it oh yeah I mean fucking Machia Valian, shut up.

Anyway.

Yeah, yeah, I'm gonna be like the office and look at the camera, uh-huh.

Yeah, but eventually the office is gonna want a word with you. You know, you go to a workplace today, you can't be like the office is going to want a word with you.

You know, you go to a workplace today, you can't be like the office.

You want to know why?

Because your fucking manager is in on the joke too.

Oh, you watch the office too?

He, look what I did.

And there's like a Christmas stocking that shows the face of like the office character.

I don't fucking know.

And you have to have the office party and it's like mandatory, the HR department is putting it up and it's like it's so and there's no way to

enact this kind of cynical distance because your your your

disnified theme park consciousness has already been integrated into the workplace itself

You're not able to be this like cool

Cyberpunk character who's you know can I tell you guys this is the most genius shit ever

Tell logo I said this because I feel like I love logo's

validation right maybe he'll think it's smart I don't know but everyone wants to

be in the cyberpunk world right like they want to be in like the Blade Runner

cyberpunk city where we're just like walking around with the trench code and it's raining and it's like oh my god

What is going on?

This you want this existential drama because it's there's something about it that is very pleasant.

But you want to know the fucking problem with that? The problem is that the cyberpunk city,

eventually the sun comes up and it actually turns out to be a theme park and then every other guy you see is also

wearing a trench coat trying to be that one guy it's like every it's like Disney

world does like a 300 pound guy wearing a stormtrooper costume because he

wants to like be in Star Wars like Like yeah you're going to have to

reckon with there's going to be like a 500 pound black guy trying to be

fucking Harrison Ford too, all right? There's going to be like a Mexican guy there's going to

be a Mexican Harrison Ford there's going to be a 12 year old Harrison Ford with his dad and his whole family's there

and including his grandma who's complaining about the weather.

And everyone's going to be walking around the cyberpunk city, like trying to capture

the essence of this.

Until they realize you have a collective responsibility for your

fantasies. You don't you're not alone in this fantasies you have. There's a level of collective

responsibility for this fantasy, right? Yeah it it's like Gotham or yeah, that's

any more vulgar version. It's like it's like you're walking around in

Gotham City and you're Batman and you're looking for all the criminal scum and

all these people who just don't get it right?

But then the lights turn on.

Gotham City is a theme park created by like, I don't fucking know,

Universal Studios, it's all like plastic.

And there's like a million other Batman's walk, and it's not only is it a million other Batman's,

it's crowded.

It's like packed like sardines, the hot amount of people

in Batman costumes walking around.

You want to know where this is actually a real thing.

Universal Studios in Orlando has a Hogwarts section of the theme park where everyone wants to be Harry Potter or Hermione Granger or Ron

Weasley right everyone does right but it's literally packed like sardines of everyone wearing the thing and it's just it ruins it for you know

if there are people don't realize there's you your fantasies are collective fantasies.

There's collective responsibility for this fantasy.

You want to be Harrison Ford in Blade Runner.

You want to be Ryan Gosling in Blade Runner 2079, right? You want that so bad, but so does everyone

fucking else. So you got to ask yourself the question, why do we want this dark shitty world

so much, right? And then you realize the whole dark shitty world is a fucking fantasy itself.

That's the ultimate utopia.

That's the ultimate utopia.

The reality is the sobering realism is that we just live in communism. The fantasy, like even Nick Land has this

fantasy, is Harrison Ford and Blade Runner. That's the actual libidinal fantasy

of the of a of a satisfaction of our desires. If you play any video game that allows you to have the freedom to enter

world's second life.

What's that other game?

VR chat.

And yeah, this is how these theme parks are themed.

Everyone wants to be a dark emo angel.

Back off, I'll take you on.

I know, I'll take on anyone.

I know that you are wrong.

This is now where you belong

the darkness inside me is everyone like everyone wants that you know

because they're a bunch of fucking babies who can't take responsibility for like huge mega construction

mining projects to keep the fucking lights on in the first place you fucking baby.

It's literally the South Park episode where like the handymen become billionaires because everyone's a

fucking retard who can't even attend to the basic premises of the technological society

they take for granted which they just use as a vehicle to realize these fucking pathetic childish fantasies.

It's like this is this is the truth.

Remember that Blade Runner theme park I just told you out or a Gotham City

theme park?

Imagine that theme park, and then it's in like in the middle of the

desert and in the background it's a bunch of like cheap Mexican migrant labor workers,

very working really hard to like keep the city running. There's like underground tunnels for like

service workers to like shift through

and there's like it's like it's such like a pain in the ass to keep this stupid

childish fantasy going whereas in reality it would be a lot more realistic and utilitarian

to just have like a normal city you know like in reality a normal city would be way

Easier to maintain but because they want it to be a dark sprouting cyberpunk world where I can be Harrison Ford walking in the

rain looking around what's going on right that's even more effort to maintain that do

you know how gay that is you know what I? Like it's even more effort to do that.

This is also true for like BAP. This is literally BAP shit. Like BAP is like,

Let's set off the veneers of the synthetic, you know, long house and just embrace the wild of life.

Let's run around as nude as body welders in the wilderness.

Ah, raping and pillaging. it's going to be so great.

Okay, in reality, there's going to be a theme park plastic forest

for these man children to fulfill the fantasy.

It's going to be ancient Greek themed, and you're going to be the lone Nietzsche

and Superman bodybuilder, you're gonna be running around,

yes, I've achieved the fantasy!

And then you're gonna run into another guy who's naked.

And there's gonna be like fucking 20,000 people

in this small place, and everyone's trying to be the main character, right?

And then you're going to look to the

horizon and see like actually the the backdrop is fake and it's like it's in the

middle of a fucking like it's in the middle of like some like shitty like I don't know it's like in the middle of some like

shitty mid western uh... city or something like cleveland ohio and it's actually just

cheap real estate i guess for the theme park development and it's like

it's actually like not even the wilderness at all and

it's just enclosed and then in in the back there's all these Mexicans just working

there's just I don't know what they're doing they're digging coal and they're throwing it in the

furnace so that the special effects and the

the theme parks electricity can keep going because it because there's there's really cool

electricity moments where like they're the Arians are like onots, naked, like Bap says.

And then there's a lightning bolt, like, shh!

Oh my God, man!

But actually, that takes a lot of electricity and like,

it takes a lot of labor to do.

There's like a whole army of, I don't know, like foreign migrant workers who have to like,

it's like really technically complicated. It's a technical feat of engineering basically. And you know, this forest, it's like, it's got to, it's so much work to maintain. It's so much work, right? But we have to do it because these guys have this fantasy that we have to like, we have to like, give them what they want. Like, dude, that's the same shit as like a childish fan, like this is what we do for children, right?

For our kids, we build a fort.

Or like, we tell a story, or I don't fucking know, we make them feel like they're living in a fantasy

so that our kids will be happy and then they

have to fucking grow up and get a job right but now we have a population of

people who like think that they're like this main character in this but it's

actually a fucking fantasy and like there's this expectation that everyone has to keep it up.

And this is actually what happened with like the 80s vapor wave aesthetic right?

Everyone's like we're living in the 80s vapor but you have to like artificially maintain that

aesthetic as a

theme park takes so much energy it just it would just be so much like easier to just

like have straight up bland communism pretty much like just having like normal bland communism would be a lot. And you know I like the cyber truck

don't let me wrong. I'm not a hater of Elon Musk's vehicles but something tells me like a normal

shitty looking car that's like boring looking probably is a lot

less effort to make than Elon Musk's like extremely simple design the boxy design like I

feel like it's a lot easier to just make like a shitty like aerodynamic looking car

It's probably a lot cheaper

But the brutalism is like very forced and it's like it's kind of like too complicated to make and too hard to make right so everyone should just really be mindful to be responsible for your fantasy. That's all I'm saying. Be responsible for your fantasy. You know? Understand that you're, you did, it's a fantasy. It's not, it's not real life, okay? And you're like, oh, yeah, yeah, I understand that this is common sense when it comes to Star Wars,

or when it comes to like, maybe even medieval fantasy, but a lot of people watch like cyberpunk,

where they play the game Cyberpunk, which I fucking hate for this reason by the way

or they like read BAP's books or they read his tweets and they feel like this is such like or they even like they're

into Nick Land and they're like this is such a cruel realism. This is the true cruelty of the

cold hard world and in reality it's a very warm fantasy that has to be attended to in a very

motherly and caring basis to keep the fantasy of a cold brutal world going.

You know what I'm saying?

You what I'm fucking saying with that?

Guys, clip this stream and clip these parts because this is literally a fucking, put

this on YouTube. this was such a genius

put it all over Twitter I don't fucking care this was like the most genius one

most genius things that are said anyway

why do China cities look cyberpunk though

either but it's not cyberpunk.

Okay, cyberpunk is like about chaos, right?

China cities are very like orderly and integrated and organized.

There's an extreme level of organization

when it comes to China Cities.

It's all the lights in China Cities

are not a bunch of like fucking random like porn ads.

It's like a coordinated light show like and it's all coordinated. You know what I'm saying?

So like it's totally different, you know?

The tweets are back. No shot. No shot. Let me see about that. They are back. Anyway, uh, okay, guys, uh, before we do anything, I want you to boost this.

I'm going to, uh, link this in the discord but I'm going to also pull it up on stream.

Before we watch the videos I want you to boost this just so we can get the word

out that there's... by the way like it and retweet it because it gets deleted, so it's not going to clutter your TL. It gets deleted after the stream.

So there's literally no reason not to. Go ahead and like this tweet, boost the shit out of this. It's right under my latest tweet boost the shit out of this like and

retweet it and then we're gonna we're gonna watch the videos you know I play Pokemon Go every day. What happened to the infrared dot

gee site? Infra fed?

What the fuck? Why is Infra Fed?

I don't know what's going on to the site. I mean. I'm going to You're going to. You can't be a dittily darn second here.

Ughtily darn second here.

Um...

And I don't want to find it now. You're not going to. Yol Nitez, that's the first subscription of the stream, what's going on?

Uh, Yone!

Nitez, that's the first subscription of the stream what's going on.

We're gonna watch the Zizik thing by the way.

In a sec.

All right, so... Hmm. All right. Okay, Infrared. GG is up and running. Alright, I fixed it.

Invered.g. is up and running.

Alright guys, I fixed it. Invered.g.g. geeg is up and running right now.

Anyway, let's, uh, let's get, let's get to the Zeejack Nick Land stuff because this is what I'm

super curious about. Let's watch.

What about this?

Nick like N. I. K. Land like land, land of glory, blah, blah.

Yeah.

So Nick Land is a British philosopher and at this point he's one of the most famous philosophers on the internet like I know you're a

meme in some way like there's muddly

let's go smudley that way but the air.

There's three philosophers that catch on with people online.

You're one of them.

Nick Land is another one.

Nick Land's a British philosopher.

He's a deluso Guatarian and he has the most... I don't even know how to describe his

concept of capitalism real quick is this he takes the losing

guitari he doesn't think he doesn't factor in re-territorialization that much he thinks capitalism is

basically synonymous with cardi marks let's go this is um this is a really

wrong description of Nick Land that he doesn't take into account re-territorialization.

I find this to be the most stupid Delosian critique of Nick Land as though he doesn't take this into account.

Well, Land is trying to say that, let's say in a given in a given let's call it in a given

cycle of de-territorialization and re-territorialization put it that way a time circuit of acceleration has occurred, which is irreversible by the way, because the

actual core of Lands' worldview is thermodynamics, remember that, right? Anyway, an irreversible, there's an irreversible arrow of time.

So even after re-territorialization, the damage is already done. Do you what I'm saying?

Re-territteratorialization never actually fully recuperates.

The, what is it called, the schiz, the schiz, uh, skit, what is it? I don't know what to fucking call it, the rhizomatic schizification, whatever you

fucking call it, that can't be reversed, right? The re-territorialization is always relative,

always in vain, right?

Ultimately from a broader perspective, not schism.

It's always, uh, it's always

It cannot reverse the general trend. That's what I mean to say. Okay. And this is this early land by the way

With de-territorialization. So he thinks capitalism is just going to decode and de-territorialization. So he thinks capitalism is just going to decode and

de-territorialize everything up until the point that it produces artificial

intelligence. He thinks that this is going to be a superintelligence and basically

like a godlike entity and it's going to bring about the

extinction of the human race because he's a battalion he thinks somehow our death is a good thing and so his

theory of capital... again I think this is uh not a very good.

Sciop, what's up? This is not a good description of Nikoline and I don't agree with

Nikolayana on anything but, oh not, not there's a kernel of truth I think in there. you have to get it right first you know

he he basically in the 90s he was around leftist and he was he was at

Warwick university and he was embraced as a kind of leftist back then.

Nowadays he'd say he never was.

But he's basically the most faithful champion of capitalism

I've ever seen, even maybe more so than Ein Rand or anything.

But precisely because he thinks it's going to bring about the end of

humanity and he he he basically got into amphetamines he had an

overdose or he had a psychotic break this is then why he's, he's like doing drugs.

What's the point of mentioning him?

He moves to China, and now he's like the biggest proponent

that spokesman for Shanghai, because he thinks actually Shanghai or the mega-

I actually don't think this is true.

I think that was true up until-

Up until late 2019, I would say.

And I think after COVID, ever since COVID, Nick Land has not been very pro-China.

I've observed that.

Because I think he was a little late to catching up to the Jizhin Ping era of China and for when he was there

he was he got there right when it started and he was more so kind of talking about an earlier era of China's opening up era

but the spiritual rejuvenation era

era of Jejin Ping, he's not a big fan of that.

The city of Shanghai is going to give rise to artificial intelligence and that's where

the singularity is going to emerge and so he's all for China, he's all for capitalism.

He ends up becoming one of the founding figures in the Neo Reaction Movement with Mencius Molebug,

Curtis Jarvin.

So he now has this really strong following online with people on the neo reactionary right.

Yeah. They all love them because they think he loves capitalism so much.

And he does, but what they don't get is he loves it because he thinks

it's going to produce a God entity that destroys all of us.

And so because he's so influential, though, and here's the thing, I mean, he hates Lacon, he hates Hegel,

he's all about to lose him Guatari, and so it's one of the things, everybody's always been curious,

though. This is such a funny description about what you think of him because he's having

he's like he's deceived the entire right wing. I don't think this is really true but it is kind of funny it's like a funny idea you know he had

such an impact on the neo reaction movement he's also considered the father of

accelerationism I know you're not a fan of acceleration is him here's the thing for him

acceleration means

accelerating capital turning itself into a god entity that's going to annihilate all of us.

And so without that being said, what do you think of what you just heard? I think it may sound shocking. I don't

want to use too much time. But I... Is Jeeject's going to say, uh... But not enough.

I think it's way too optimistic theory. There you go.

You know, optimis...

Very predictable.

For me, optimism is not simply everything will turn out good, well, and so on and so on.

Optimism is precisely this stance of being a clear line of development and then there is some

point which appear to most of us catastrophic but for him it's a desired goal and so on and so on for theoretical reasons I think that I

think that singularity in this precise sense I've elaborated this in my book Hegel in the wire brain,

singularity in the sense of all of us single individuals

becoming...

I think this is really where I stopped thinking Jizek was producing productive

insights to be honest. I think sex and the failed absolute was very good. It had problems of its own by the way but I think that

was his final work in my eyes. After that this whole stupid shit about Hagel in a

wired brain I just I find it completely a disaster, you know?

Like collectively flowing in some kind of divine like mind that it simply is imminently impossible that again here again we have a wonderful example

of what I was talking about before the big other singularity in the sense of godlike artificial intelligence is the

latest figure of the big other and it's interesting that I forgot who I quote it in

one of my books that some there are even some

thinkers of singularity who claim that you know I count them among what I

I only call not yet Hegelians who who are these people I know it's not

the resa Nagarastani because he doesn't talk about singularity, but he does talk about the nature of

intelligence and intelligence.

You want to know what I find to be a great tragedy is I like Nickland, don't get me wrong, I like Nick Land, right?

I'm not saying his popularity is unjustified.

I'm not saying that.

But I'm saying that Resa Nagararestani is worthy of generating a movement and in a general

and he raises questions that deserves to spur trends of its own, right? To aestheticize, to think about, to kind of

whatever. And I think Nick Land, I think a lot of people underestimate that one of the reasons Nick Land was able to catch on on the

internet so well is just how striking his writings are from the perspective of like their aesthetic significance like they're

they're very spectacular right the descriptions are they're very

uh... i'm not i don't find the good words right now but you know what I'm saying they were very

colorful I guess but I think one of the most underrated people is Raza and I did I have a I have

profound disagreements with him as well but

Reza is a fundamental context for Haas even if I'm disagreeing with him, it's like,

my stance is that you don't, you're not going to get a full picture of it, I don't think.

Maybe, maybe, I don't know.

But Rezzo was the one who inspired me to

think within the context that I did. Does that make sense? Like, he established the necessary range of relevant questions and problems which I

resolved in my own way which was a complete independence which drew me to

conclusions that even disagree with his framing a lot but regardless

I think that he is very very very very underrated I would say that he's extremely underrated like very underrated. I would say that. He's extremely underrated, like criminally

underrated. Intelligence and spirit is not, like Nick Land generated the whole

fucking movement on Twitter, right? Like the whole cave Twitter, right? Like the neo-rationalists, I admit, they were

considered very boring, right? A lot of it wasn't that fun, because a lot of it was analytical

philosophy, boring math stuff, right?

But with Resa in particular, and I would say Ray Brescia, if I'm saying his name, right?

People like that, there's a depth to that.

It's not just like boring math shit there's an actual depth to it

the way he interprets analytical philosophy I think

he does it in a way that leaves no room for

for what I would say metaphor He does it in a way that leaves no room for

for what I would say metaphysical thinking, right? He doesn't like just say philosophy is one way of thinking and that's it.

He really is trying to get to the nature, the fundamental nature of reality through philosophy, right? And that takes a lot of courage.

And you know, this is why I still respect him to this day. But I all I can say I can't say I agree with him on everything. I can't say I have the same

views as him but what I can say is he is criminally underrated I could say that.

Those readers of Hegel who think Hegel was in some sense right but he jumped to his

conclusion too early what Hegel, total reconciliation of subject and substance of man and God

needs some more time. So even Marx was this in a sense, at least in the reading of young

Lucach history and class consciousness.

Yeah, and there's your problem.

There's your problem.

Mark said...

Sleeper so, what's going on?

Diya was dead.

Not in the spirit to a domain.

Where's the up to these days?

You know, I don't know at all, but I can tell you that I've been waiting for his new book,

it's going to be called something abducting the outside, I don't know what it's called. And that one is going to be called something abducting the outside.

I don't know what it's called.

And that one is going to be probably,

I think they're probably aiming for that to be on a similar level

in terms of the

popularity as I hope it is this fang noumina like maybe somewhat of a response to that lands

because it's gonna be his collected works over a long period

and it's been delayed it's like fucking holy shit, it's like, it's like the

star citizen of philosophy books because it's been delayed for like 20 years and I'm no one to talk.

I'm definitely not want to talk when it comes to that but it's been delayed since forever.

Like I've been I remember that was supposed to come out in like 20, I don't know.

I think it was supposed to come out in like 2019.

And then it's just still not out, which shocks me.

Yeah.

I am looking forward to that, and I actually am going to read it and review it and I'm actually I might even make a video

Reviewing it and giving my thoughts on it

But I'm I've been waiting for it and it's it's supposedly coming out in the spring and I what I don't understand is that it's the it's the collected or selected works I don't know from from the early 2000s I think all the

way up to 2018 so there's a cutoff point so I don't think anything new is being

written for it so I'm I'm just wondering what is going on. I don't know. Maybe the editing process or I have no idea. I have no idea. But it's it's up to 2018.

So it's not like there's need there's more time being to write new things.

I don't know what what's going on.

But that's going to be a lot of very interesting.

But in the social domain, subject and substance, which means work and capital will be reconciled only through communist revolution.

So Hegel was too early.

Then you have of course Pukuyama who thought Hegel was too early.

It's only with today's liberal democracy, global capital, that we are there.

And then you had, again, artificial intelligence Hegel, Hegel, who said what Hegel prophesied as the reconciliation of subject and substance

will happen only with singularity where individual subjectivity will be drowned in and in this sense totally reconciled with substance.

My first point here is that already at the limited level of artificial intelligence that we know today.

Why do we presuppose?

And I just want the tour.

I follow here even some intelligent, I don't agree with them but they are not

idiots quantum physicist and quantum cosmologists like the German lady Sabine

a cousin fell there why is he why is she such a thing nowadays? Where did Sabine come from? What the fuck? Like why is she so...

Even Paul Coxshot was like gassing her up. Why does everybody love Sabine?

What the fuck, dude?

And she's literally just a Yewtuber.

I know she's a professor and shit.

But she's the pop scientist, alright? And she's my like biggest arts nemesis too.

Who is huge anti-Hagelian by the way huge disaster

Who claims that why do we always imagine artificial intelligence in this trans-human

sense as some consistent god-like totality? What if it will be a breathtaking total inconsistent mess?

It will not be anything...

That kind of tracks with Sabine's hideous worldview in general where she talks,

you know, she doesn't believe in the necessity of

elegance and simplicity for scientific theory. And I just reject this

disgusting hideous, you know, atonal theory of, or I should rather say this atonal

representation of reality. And I hope Reso would agree with me on this, but maybe not. But I think definitely for me, I agree with

a platonic orientation that everything must be thought of as one whole, just to begin,

just as a beginning. And then there's definitely a dialectic in there, sure, but there is one truth and one reality, but I don't know. Maybe I'm alone when it comes to that.

Fine.

But a more important point for me is this one that I would strictly prohibit here the use of the term

God because here I follow another person whom you mentioned in

your letter to me, Heidegger. The thing to learn from Heidegger is that what we imagine as the divine immortal dimension is always rooted in our

finitude, which I read in a more materialist way, in our concrete social constellation.

There is no God in itself.

What we experience as divine is a moment of our concrete historical texture,

which means that the moment we become infinite in the sense of directly participating

in God-like entity, we not only lose our humanity, but we lose the divine dimension itself also.

We cannot do direct...

What the fuck?

You see, but the only way to...

The earbuds can find it.

What what the fuck is this?

Okay, it's over.

Anyway.

I don't agree with what he says, uh,

nah, yes, yes, our, um, the extent of our ability to have knowledge about God, which saying that itself is kind of already heretical.

Is obviously something historical, but

does that mean God is himself historical?

And I think God renders history superfluous.

So I don't know, I don't want to talk too much about this. I'll just watch this one and then talk about this one. But he didn't really I didn't I wasn't I didn't think his answer was

interesting. That's the thing. I I was hoping that he knew who Nickland was and I think he does know who he is

But he just see Zizek for the first time acknowledged Dugan

Recently and it was just like a Wikipedia summary so I'm really disappointed that he's not

engaging with these thinkers but at the same time he is not he's not an internet

philosopher if I'm a philosopher I'm an internet philosopher and you know what I don't see serious philosophy happening in universities. I don't see that anymore.

I actually see it happening on the internet. And sure, there's a lot of fucking retards and

bullshitters, I I agree but I think serious

serious theory is happening has been happening on the internet for and

Zizek has been the exception by the way at the expense of his academic environment not

because of it because of the internet I think.

The only thing I'll add is for him I don't know if divine for land he thinks this deity or entity as he calls it is more

Lovecraft it's a pure nightmare we can't even begin to process it it's not like I

think there's a lot of confusion here about the actual theory which probably also has to do with the fact there was it was never very rigorously presented

but um this is just kind of a not a very good introduction anything divine in the way that we would think of Christ or Allah or some as divine.

It's it's a complete Lovecraft nightmare that we can't begin to process.

What I would say is that it is, uh...

I think, I think the Lovecraft thing is first of all, I don't think Nick Land believes

artificial intelligence is a singularity per se and I think the significance of

Lovecraft for him is less about AI.

It's actually more that AI, the ideas about AR are more like a conclusion of his underlying

I guess Lovecraftian ontology but it's not it's

not like he first begins with an AI fiction and then creates a theory around it so I what I'm trying to say is I think this kind of undersells what Nick Land's theory or provides a very wrong picture of it.

I don't know. I can't put this eloquently.

I still think that the way he describes it, it's too risky.

Because if that is...

It's just going to refine its intelligence and just it's almost like surplus

intelligence just more and more it's just going to get better and better more consistent

okay what's our algorithms here is what does you mean by intelligence because my basic point in my Hevelin and the Wire Brain book is that.

See Nick Land completely independently, a big part of his ontology is, if you can call it an ontology you'd

probably reject that idea but it's about the it's about like I can't even say

mathematics because this has a platonic undertone to it maybe but

definitely he develops a response to de laus

which many have compared to bad due because of the strong emphasis on mathematics, and I guess

you would maybe a mathematical ontology, but he violently opposes Badu's platonic orientation and they're not they're very different as what I'm trying to say

but they both have that similarity which is the general emphasis on mathematics is the most fundamental numbers

basically is the most fundamental reality right the most fundamental way in which we can interface with reality comes to us in the form of numbers. Anyway, it's more that Nickland has a very specific view of what intelligence is and what

knowledge is and what human is and so on and so on that leads him to the

conclusion of AI and that's really what's important I don't

think this guy's talking about any of that. If there is and I ask this question many

many many theorists with whom I'm in regular contact you you know, I have my strange connections.

Yeah, land is like G. G. 3-3 pill.

Yeah.

With quantum physicist with artificial intelligence theories.

And my big question, one of the big questions to them is,

is precisely this one, how that obviously his representation of artificial intelligence is

the lesion it is yeah absolutely means he bases it on desiring production and machinic unconscious.

Yeah, but we see here's here's what I'm not satisfied. I think I think there was

I think the whole c c c r u thing

needs to be acknowledged not just as an extension of Deloze but like an entirely new branch on the tree and I know Deloze H trees or whatever but you get what I'm saying. It's an entirely new qualitative development. Yes, Deloza is very important there, but let's ask the

question, why couldn't we Laconians have our own breakthrough like that? Or maybe we did and it's called infrared.

You know? Who knows? I wouldn't, at this point i wouldn't really say i'm a lacanian

but uh... the genealogy is definitely there

but you know is it

le con is to infrared what de lus was to CCRU and I might be able to die on that hill to be honest

I think so and you can't see it because I don't sound like a Laconian, but the logic is, if you're familiar with it, you can see it, you know?

I think that again, here my Friday approach enters, unconscious is... that's

that is really just Hegel and then de laus is really just spinosa right that's really

what we're dealing with like it's not really lacacon, it's Hegel.

And that's, those are the patriarchal foundations. It's Spinoza versus Hegel.

Simply a meaningless term without subjectivity,

because for Freud, unconscious is not. Like notice how all the refined

acceleration is just became Spinoza's so cringe. Some basic flux without subject and so on.

What Wright calls unconscious is.

Unconscious formations, fantasies, and so on

are answers replies to a certain deadlock,

which characterizes the rise of the subject.

So all these descriptions, infinite flux, no border, no longer human, blah, blah,

for me still remain fantasies, fantasies in the sense of avoiding a certain break. My counter answer would have been

with. Thoughts on the Lubliano school? Yeah, that's where I, that's, that's, see, one day the story of Haas will be told,

it'll be very interesting. But, um,

We don't.

Yeah, I'm definitely.

Within this world, that's the school that I had strongly identified the most with, you know?

No, if this will happen, i don't think it will happen

we don't why it doesn't keep the conclusion that we are already there

well i'll tell you what because he has a teleological

concept of time he thinks the future is more real than the present moment is and that the

I actually agree with that I agree with that notion the future is more real than the

president I agree with that the future is actually I mean you're you're the you're one of the great

thinkers of retroactivity but he takes it not as a quilting point we change the

past because we re symbolize it yeah there's something in him he's taken like a

literal physical record.

That's why he's badass. That's why I like Nick Land because I don't like this dumb shit where everyone's just like,

oh, it's just like a metaphor man. Yeah, I'm simplifying it, but it's like, I hate this shit where it's like,

no, it's just the transcendental frame

of which we re-symbalize the past

and we reinterpret it, but nonetheless, this is the most fundamental horizon of reality so it may as well be reality like no motherfug let's talk about real reality you know let's talk about actual reality

intro causality like this thing exists out in the future and it's time traveling or sending influential based

by caught retro causes that's the courage of Nickland he actually was about it can

time to affect I know but I'm. But I, now we are coming.

See, I believe the same thing, but instead of an AI, I believe it's, um,

civilization states, if you can call them that, polarities. See I combine Nick Land with Dugan.

I like this very much to even more fundamental let's call them naively I don't like

this term metaphysical questions. I remain here a Hegelian materialist. Let me explain this crazy

notion. You know when Hegel says, I quoted this at least ten times, when Hegel says how philosophy can only grasp a certain Levenskisalt figure of life, social order,

when it enters its decline. That and I think that I agree with land.

How much do you advance theories?

Ah. It's not that deep.

I mean it's deep but it's like

just intense focus I guess.

I guess.

I think there's two types of people one one type of person is in the university

discourse whether just kind of like

reinterpreting what authorities have said and it varies different ways

Very scared of the possibility of a novel insight. And then you have the

schizophrenic who believes they've they've stumbled upon a theory of

everything because they've given their first shot at trying to understand the world.

And then, you know, a lot of people in the community were guilty of this too, I observed it.

It's like, you basically this is the first time you stumbled upon a theoretical observation and then you get schizophrenic and

think you're a prophet of God and that you're the smartest person ever, no one's ever thought of this.

Academia will keep you in check and say, nofucker somebody's thought of that before go back

you know your understanding is incomplete and then there's the other type of person who's

completely like wild and thinks schizophrenically believes that they're like a god, right?

Not a god, a prophet or something, right?

And then with me, I feel like I've always been able to be kept in check

because a different selection process was at play that

was driving my theoretical development where I was under a selective pressure to not be ignorant of whether I was treading familiar ground and to

discipline myself have I taken into consideration what others have already

said about this and so on.

It was just a very unique circumstance, I would say.

Which I think is kind of rare, you know?

I think it's pretty rare.

I think people just kind of don't know how to balance these

two extremes and tend toward one or the other where actually you have to be in the

middle and have to balance them but it takes see it takes a lot of courage to break from the university discourse.

And for how much effort and courage and bullshit you're going to have to go through just to do that,

a lot of people find it very easy to just like

go full schizophrenic retard

and forego any discipline.

And that's what I don't.

And it's, you know what, it's the same when it comes to ideology.

I mean like, look at anarchists and Gonzalese,

isn't that the same thing?

They reject mainstream politics, and then I'm a

Bordagus now, I'm a anarchist now, I'm a whatever fucking edg lord you want to be who's just like

lacks any discipline at all to have any sort of responsibility

ideologically for the actual reality you live in, you know?

So you have to understand, there's a...

The selection pressure is an important thing. I would say.

Yes, the representation of human being that is now in danger with artificial intelligence is something disintegrating today. But what he learned projects into the future as this.

But I'll say I would not be where I was today.

I don't want to throw him under the bus,

because I know I'm a very bad guy and I'm a big villain. But, um...

Resa is straight up very underrated. Wouldn't be where I was today without that perspective. I could just say that I view him as a very courageous

thinker if not one of the most courageous thinkers which you wouldn't you wouldn't

think which you wouldn't wouldn't think just gleaming off of the kind of

appreciation he has for analytic philosophy which I don't have

but when you understand that he doesn't consider it

like a special division of labor within the sphere of the

intellect but actually a real description of reality it's actually there's like a

a lot to it you know know, I don't know.

Okay, let me put it this way.

Resa has just as much, if not more, metaphysical depth as Nick Land does.

I think, right? He does. It's just in a roundabout way it seems really boring but

there's a lot behind it like it seems really boring but there's just as much

metaphysical I don't like using that word but you get the idea there's this as much metaphysical, I don't like using that word, but you get the idea.

There's this as much metaphysical depth.

And when I say metaphysical depth, I mean to say, being able to step outside of the bounds of a conventional view of reality

and take a very kind of alien perspective, you know? I guess I would put it that way.

But I have severe disagreements with his views, with his philosophy in general, but at the same time I think that there's something called the courage of thought you know it's a real thing Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think that this is, this is a strict, again, projection, fantasy formation on the gap in our situation here, which is already here.

Can you say that you're losing Blotari even do this at the end of antietepus with their image of the new earth which

it's like, oh, we have a form of desire that's not neurotic, it's not based on the signifier law, it's not

caught up with that.

Exactly. I think that I this is why we don't have time to enter it, but this is why I think that

Anti-Edipus is arguably the worst book that they wrote.

I much prefer difference in repetition, logic of sense,

then maybe their last book is a little bit better introduction to philosophy or what

What about a thousand plateaus?

What do you think about a thousand plateaus where do you put that?

A little bit better.

It's already a little bit better than that lower.

I agree. I don't like Ant-edipus either, not a fan.

Point of anti-edipus. You know how I would read the Lewis and Guateri, especially the Lus.

In anti-edipus, edipus is defined as the agent of territorialization, retotalizing whatever.

But read his own logic of sense, where towards the end Etypus is introduced precisely as an

unlocatable outcast.

So the latest for me a wonderful example of something that holds for many great thinkers.

Their big moment is not at the end.

It can be at the beginning in the middle or where, for example, as I repeatedly tried to show with

selling. No, what I would say again, but let's not lose time with Nick

Lent. We can't He's okay so that that was

All right I didn't we didn't know gems and it was not that not that interest it was nothing new

as he's been saying that ship since forever so it's like

It's not necessarily what he said is uninteresting it It's just not new, you know, it's just not particularly new.

Uh, okay guys, Twitter's back.

back. What do I mean by the

what do I mean by the courage of thought?

Um,

I basically mean to isolate everything else and to elevate the intellect as the highest.

It is kind of a rationalistic thing when you think about it, but not necessarily, but I think it's platonic in origin.

It's taking responsibility for the whole of reality by means of the intellect and affording no consolation for yourself whatsoever in this wider division of labor with which we comprehend the whole of reality, right? So I think that's what I mean by the

courage of thought. It's the courage of being able to really believe you can account for all reality by the incipient gesture of thinking.

But my view is a little different, right? I believe this is a very courageous act, but I think why this is the necessary

necessary act is because thought as the privileged medium by which we relate to the whole of reality

is the first obstacle to it. So my view is kind of more about a sixth sense, right? Not necessarily

thought or I'm definitely not a rationalist at all, right? But I do believe thought is the most immediate means by which the

concrete becomes for us one thing, right?

One thing in which we are forced to confront

our relation and our decision in relation to that, you know, because that's a real thing.

What is our decision in relation to the reality we live in?

What choice do we make in terms of assuming responsibility for our place in it, you know?

There you go through philosophy to discard philosophy and that's my view. Once you go through

philosophy you can responsibly act as a Marxist-Leninist wizard who has the Stalin and Mao-like far-sightedness and sage-like insight into the entirety of reality

and all its fullness and depth and wisdom.

And that's what I ultimately believe in. The sage-like

wisdom of Marxism-Leninism. But anyway that's neither here nor there. Uh, guys we're going to wrap it up. Good stream. I hope it was substantive for you.

We didn't have Twitter throughout it and I don't want to go back to Twitter to be quite frank.

I'm going to get back to work.

I'm going to get back to work and then probably go to bed. I'll see you guys.

And I'm cooking, I'm cooking, no I don't have an ETA, but I don't plan on it.

I don't plan on taking too much longer to be honest. Anyway guys.

See you see.