WE UP

2025-11-05T04:06:52+00:00
Swine-Wan New Year,
Poo-Wan Dili,
K'LUli
K'Li,
share-e-SI
Waii-Ci
Cigris
and tiny liquor bottles
just what you
expect
inside a new Balenciagos
Yeah
cigarettes inside your liquor bottles
Just what you expect inside a new
Balenciago
Oh my son and all Oh my family in new the I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm
I'm
believe between
the turn fang
and
the
the
city and
the
world the
man
and
no
no no co-co No one could Kew Kodi My D-D My D-D
One-Wing
I'm
In the War
I'm
I'm
Chouin'
No
No
No
No No
No No No No
I
No No No
To M
P
City
and
I think The I just Sandsen-thewan't To see
Thee
Whence
When you To see For
Thee I'm
To be
Chon-chang
Hym
Nien
I
I'm
The I'll talk I'll talk a little bit chan't
Aikoultice
I'd another
I'd another
Turn and turn
and go to see Yeah, I'll see our girls I'm at a A day chanue This is New Valencia
Gaucea Gilles
Gilles Fouly
Fon
Furn Pue
Fonger Pue and me
The
Furn
Pue Light New New New New New
I
I'm I I'm I'm what I'm not tronemental.
I'm a tronel. I'm a long
d'any.
Turnpongchie.
No.
Chon be shy.
It's
is the need.
When the
the home
we're in
no
no quix,
you know
no
coogee.
The me the and I know show you know the and I'm not No one No one No one
No one
In the
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm I'm
I'm I'm I'm I'm man I'm
I'm
many
No
many and one
I'm
No I'm don't believe and you The One day Thee
One's
Thee
When you see and the
When he
Thee
I'm
Thee I'm behind
Thee
Thee
The Gave Gave Gave Gaud I I'm I'm I and I see all this year the sky
you're like to see all good Quotan that truan, noon, no, yet,
Poo-Wan bierlii,
Kolo-lii,
and some-sehs like-wee-te-wee tini.
Cigarettes and tiny liquor bottles just what you expect inside a new Valenciago
Cigarettes inside your liquor bottles with the chair, expect, inside a new Valenciago. I don't know. It's scary. Inside New
Valencia
I can't
I'm car car
I'm
beyond is you when the home you you
don't
come you
and you
and
you
and
I'm I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
many no many
and
I'm can't I can't know Dely How long Y'i
Shee
Chieie
Chieue Chieffey
From
Lue
Dity
Dichichie
When you Choo-N-Shy
Wachy
I do
Chon-hank
Yen-Gy
I and hear you you and I'll hear of a longue I'd
another one
I'd
turn and
go see
I'm
New Valencia
Gauau GERauau unlaw
free
If
if I take
I take I for
I'm
I'm I'm I'm beautiful I see you New New New New New I'm just a need I'm going to see
I'm going to be like I'm going to
I'm going to
get away
between between
trangangue
No country
it's in
it's your Deng
when the
Hovee Hocke
You're not
No.
No. No.
The world
show you
I'm not
Hsuie Inu
Inu I
I'm
I'm
Inu
no In my
no
In Lue In one One one one One The The heart me inside you see all this
I'm
excited
you
see all
this see all this. Yeah. I Quotan that
Chon, that Chon,
no,ue
No,
in Pue Wands
K'O'O'Ne,
and see,
like, c'i,
c'i, and siding he said some away in the street
cigarettes
and tiny liquor bottles
just what you
expect
inside a new
Valenciauga
cigarette
inside
inside liquor bottles with which you should expect in the lights inside the big of bribal
the chair
except
inside in new
Blaise I'm gonna
cross
love
and I'm
breath
in the
country chancity
and
the ches of you and the and the family who's the chen
chris
ernie
the
humonged
and
the
home the
get
no no I love a truan-a-torn-wa-chang-wet,
I'm not really,
it's not really,
and yet,
and the think-s'-since-s'-wee-thin-be-thin-be,
the
and in-shundsui-lid-chee, by you shui loci I don't know I'd
go to
call
and
it's and I don't know how to be a
turn in a year
I'd another
another time
year,
this name,
trin'er,
there's a new
glensia,
ghost,
the loy,
the free,
the floor, if I'm for me, and I'm, I'm going to I love The world The free The Fonger
Take I Chesue
I'm
I feel
I'm I think
I'm
I'm
I'm Chon
I'm I'm
many
D'
Chon Fing
Ch
Fing
No you
Ches You and you and the you, tromboky The chung The chen Thee
When the
The Hull
Poo
The I'm
No
No No
No
Rue I'm
No
Rue I'm
I'm
I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
know
I'm
I'm I'm I'm
I'm I'm
I'm I'm I'm I'm
I'm see
and I'm
see like see and see
and you see and see and see The city is for you shrewing I'm going to
hear of
the world and
I'm sorry you're willing to see all this. See I wish I Wight I'm I'm Ch Oh, wands nil, but only the
day he's every every
place in the new Valencia Scress
Inside the
Pickle bottle
and
Instead
inside in New
Belaxia Oh come
on
Furning War Migh
Boon Daly Chon Fanchi Ch Fong Ch Fong Ch Fuch I'm not I'm not I'm going between
from quix
I'm
the churned
and you
and
the
behind the unlaw and
you
get
and the and the and the you be the most you know so you would be I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm my night
I'm
I'm
believe I'm
only unty so
I'm
the
d' think
the
d' d' d'
in the city and the city the city
and the
people who
people
and the
people
and
the
and the
I don't
and a and and I'll find a I don't know I'll see
I'm going to
let me
turn in a
meet
I'm in
see see
there's
turn and go
let's see our a girl so let's your goose I'm good for a free and let's in the turn, and go to see the seymal Go ahead
let's see our good
foot of
let's
take me
take me like
and if
I'm like
I'm
see you
see
New Valencia
I'm
I'm I'm my my
I'm
I can't go many can't and can't I'm I'm many
the way
I'm
in the
ch'
It's
the
time
and the I'm
could be
uncoe
you
and the
you
the
and I see you I'm think I'm I'm
in the
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
one
I'm
one one and
I'm
one
one
and the ming
I
you and you see and you see and The one of the people from the city Thank you I'm sorry to new
and see all good
Let's see all good I'm I'm sorry to New See our
GERG
I'm
On B Quotan that truan, no-ye No one
No one
In Column Cue
Cien
Some
Cigratus
and tiny
liquor bottles
Just what you
expect Inside New Balenci tiny liquor bottles just what you expect inside a new belenziago cigarette inside your liquor bottles
get to show expect inside a new belenziago I see the United I'm gonna see I'm I'm gonna
see I'm
the world I'm
car
I'm
couldn't
be the people
and
turn P
Pue
the city and the you
and
the
and you and Pauau Pau Pau Pau you the and the one You know, No one No one No one No
No
No
No
I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm Man Man Man
I'm
No
Lung I
Chie
A Tien T
N City T
D D D D D D D D and the loo-heed I seey A-teecian-see-e Like-s-S-wee-thew-ty-ty-thew-ty-kiss-she-by-she-le-le-k-she-k-she-la-chee,
and-hru-lach-kissure-he. I'm Tohurt
To find a In a year I'm
turn and
Go ahead
New Valencia
Gau
Gau
Saly
Farnu
Furn
Pond
Firm
Pond
me
Go
and
I think
I see New
New
Lanes New New New New I'm going to be like to be a big living. I'm a car.
I'm a car.
I'm a long.
I'm going to be in
trombie.
Uncundity
all the city
chen is you
the
unbeat.
You know,
could be co-key and me and I see me and I see The No way Noe The Longy The Aulue Aik Thee
Thee Pue
The
I'm
The
I'm The
I'm
When
I'm
I'm
I'm
Hsu
Rue
Rue Rue G G G G G G G G G G
I I I I starting you and see all the same I'm I'm excited
New
and see all this I Woh tan that
Chuan
New Year
Poo-Wan
Geli
K'Lewan
K'O'i K'i-Gye
Shink
cigarettes
and sny liquor bottles just what you expect inside a new Valencia.
Go cigarette and tiny liquor bottles just a sure.
Expect inside a new binaia I can't see a lot,
trunna,
I'm going to be in
truanity,
the country
the chung-de-chengue
the chenish of you
and the home-de-heu-chie and who The city's in the city's You're the On the
Holy Wrig
You know
No one No
No
No No
No
No I think the world I'm not yet I'm a-wain-he-li-li-li-he-he-he-chie
se-y-chie-see-se-s'-s'-sci-se-weeck-be-thew-ty-becky-chew-kissue-h-hury-hye-h Kung-Chang-hany. I don't know
I'd like
a while I'm seeing I love her, I'll go and a
turn in a
year, I'd
see
turn,
and
go see
a
no I'm going to sea
a and I'm
for the for me
and I take me I'm I'm I'm I'm see you I'm going to
let's see you
I'm
I'm going to
I'm
I'm trying
a
I'm
a you're unquest unquest you
ch'
man
ch'
ch' The city's You know It's a myth When the
How many
No.
No.
No.
The
The
Mour Sury No
No No No No No No No
No No No
No
No No No No No No No No I'm in the world's I don't know I'm in
long as long as
one's
one's
I'm sorry
and See, I'm excited Heart me Inside in
See our
We're We're starting new and we'll be all this. I Here he can't jump away to see
cigarettes
and tiny liquor bottles
just to chew
expect
inside a new
Valenciaga
cigarettes
inside
liquor bottles
bottle
bottle
just to churn Valencia Goal Girlress inside the black
in
the glass
inside
the new
Black
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm many
I'm
in many many
in it in unhing and you in I don't know. From the From Fongue The city
The
City The
Rue The Rue
The Pongue
There
A
No No No No No No No No No I don't know I'm sorry I'm I'm I'm a
Chouye
I'm
many
I'm a
Leroye
Chie
A-e Chie Stee St, N' St,
D'
D'
D' Dichich
When you
Wich G Ch' Coo Cong The City is by you slurgy Thee
Go
Shunuch Kung
and Yeah and and the I don't know the I'm down a little
I'm doing
I'll wait
I'd
then a time
turn a
june
see I think
I can't see all goods
through
the flue the through flight of lau the floor and I take I for for I for for I New Valencia August The way From the free
The floor
If I'm not
For the key
I cherish
When I'm
I'm going to
Get away
To see
New Valencia
Ago
I'm not
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm
No one
Dany
Chongongue Chongue No Chooning You Choon You Choo Ch I don't know In the From home To see
The city
When you It's
The Man
The
Hovey
You
No
No
No
No No
No
No
No No No No
I I I'm I I'm I I I'm not only, I'm in, I'm in, I'm a-
I'm in
, I'm in
the way,
and I'm
light,
and I'm
a-e-he-chie see-se-wee
un-p
-ty-n-d-d-
-pe-n-ty-
-chie-chie-sui,
and you sleep light
and
I don't and
I'm in the and, the, and,, The sight of New Belmont to see our wish I wish I I
Quotan that
One
Quotan that
Chon that Chouin'na
Chouin'u'an
B'irii and hear a shan-s-sue wine, no one yet, no one bally co-lo
in
yet
a every every every every every every and in in the i would you expect inside a new
Valencia
cigarette
in sight
entire liquor bottle
to change
expect
inside a new
Valenciagos
Oh I'm not from a
ball
to tell you
I'm barely'm a car In the
I'm D'i
To bring
The Quet
The
Quet
The
city
It's
You
It's You and
No
No
No
No No one No
No I'm New
I'm I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm many I'mauauauauau I'm
I I'm Chie M't Pym Ping P City L
P The When I think of the city's wett.
The city's,
By you shui-n-said,
and you shui-law-key,
I do-do-shrou-chung,
and yet-gee.
I'm going to see
I'm
a little
I'm I think the sign-you This is New Valenciargo
So
L'A
GER GER L'A
GER
Ful'
Fon
Faye
Furn
Ferry
Farn Pue Furn Fug Furn
I
Mug Mug Mug Mug Mug M Mug
I Mug M I'm gonna see our... I'm gonna cross. I'm gonna travel I'm my
one many
from
the turn fang
to
the
and
the
world the the
and
the
no
no no no no no, No one Thee
Thee
I'm
No,
I'm I'm I'm, The one's the same-sue and see-upon-quist
and the sea
and in the sea, and in the sea,
the world's
rain-up
the world's
behind the
the
and the Let's see I'm excited
new
but let's see all this. Quotan that truan,
no-ye,
no one
d'i,
and c'o-lid
and scy
scythe-since-wee
cigarette
and tiny liquor bottles
just what you expect inside a new Balenciaga's
Yeah
Correct, inside your liquor bottles, just with your
expect inside a new Balenciago Oh, I'm not going to sit inside a new When I see our
I'm
I'm going to
get in
The moon
The Middle Man DeLey
Turn greek
The city
The
Man's
Your
Man the
Hovee
No No No No No No when the home the world and
no co-e
the
world
and the
one
I'm
the light
I
light
the
I'm
no no and I
and
I see and the and see and the I think the I'm there's no like I'm
a year see
and the I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
Don't
I'm I'm I'm
A day
I'm in a
See
I'm See See Zing turn and I'll be a A while a A while I'd I'd I'd
See then
A turn
You
Go ahead
SIDING
New Valencia
GAR GER
So
GER
You're Fon Faye
Fon Faye
PON
Furner Tew
Fongue
Fongue
I
Toch
Pallor
LID LIT Y I think the I'm going to be back the
New Orleans
I can't
I'm On the
I'm
between
Thee
between between
The Quet Chimbing Burt Cheney
It's
you
It's you
No
many
No
no
No No No No day No one way No one
To get
To be
I'm free
I'm sorry
I'm in
I'm in
I'm in
I'm
I'm
I'm turn and
I'm
I'm many
It's
It's long history and One thing and three and three and again I don't know any way And so longy
Shere a gist
Like-scy
Wainty and
The heart me inside you will be see all
this I'm going to
see our I Quotan that
Chon,
that's
Chon
Thee
Pue
Cologne
Inche
a scene
Siams
We tinge
Cress and slyly goodbye I'm throwing in Cinerettes
inside your liquor bottles
just what you expect
inside a new
balance yoghugust
cigarette
inside liquor bottles
get to show expect inside I'm not inside the big of a virus Get a
It's dead
Inside in
New New New New New New New
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm Mar
many
auau man
many
The The Wuchengue of city Choms'
The
Wally POM I had the turn, I see yet I'm many
I'm
many
and
I'm
like
I'm
I'm
and
I'm
think think
and
the thing the
I'm
see
and
and and the book and
the
city
and the I'm in the I'm I'll talk a
man-y-gue,
I'd then a-tong-a-torn
and then-tron,
and go to sea.
New Valencia-Garco
Sourouly-Pon-Pay-Den-Pay-D
Fong-Lor-Ti-Wi and shi upon me and shan-law-to-you I'm gonna let's see The Flanlo Take me
Please
I'm gonna
keep on the
I'm gonna
leave
leave let's see
I'm
I'm gonna
go ahead
I'm
unbue
Wondi
Daly
chungongue
Chich
Duchery
It's It's you Thee D from the from the city the city the city the
when the
there's
no
no
there
no
the
I'm the
I'm
no
in the
I'm
I'm
I can
I
see I'm I'm I'm I'm in I'm in I'm not close to watch the heartily lonely
lonely
I'm
a
I'm a I'm a I'm
I'm One thing you know and the I don't know and and I'm not going to be. I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm not going to
I'm going
and a lot of
I'm not I'm not I'm and and the I'm
a lot of
the I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm not
I'm
I'm I'm I'm not
I'm
I'm
I'm What's up, everybody? I want to, first of all, say, Australia Stanley with the 20. What the fuck is up, bro? Appreciate you.
Appreciate you, Australia, Stanney.
And Steve Saint with a tan, what's up, bro?
Phil Fo, what's up?
Appreciate you all.
Ah.
What an interesting day.
I got some explaining to do.
Okay.
How do I put this this why is the stream late what was i talking about in the discord what was i hyping up sold sold r oA Things did not quite go
as expected
I did say likely
I didn't say guaranteed
but I want to actually at least get i want the opportunity to
explain it okay so you guys are not sitting on the edge of your seat okay so today there was a possibility that a muslim communist was going to win mayor of a city
eating odds and i know you're thinking you know haz you're talking about zoron right
zoron already won no i'm talking about an actual muslim communist so now you get it so let me
let me just give you the story from the top.
I think a few months ago there was a good guy.
He's a good guy, okay?
Brigham, he's a good guy he's a good guy okay uh brigham he's a good guy you know i keep keep calling him brigham young but his name is brigham keys because in my head i mean brigh Young is like, I don't know why I keep
going back to that name. The Mormon
guy. No, his name is Brigham Keyes.
And, you know,
some of our comrades in Georgia
got into contact with him a few months ago.
I think sometime in the summer.
And Brigham Keyes is a good guy.
He's a, he's a, he's a, he's a communist before our party.
So he wasn't raised up and trained by our party.
He's somebody who came before our party as a communist.
But he was, he liked our message.
He liked what we were putting down. And he, um, you know, he, he, but he was, he liked our message, he liked what we were putting down,
and he, you know, he got into contact with our party. He met some of our party people.
And he just so happened to be, you know, kind of campaigning. Tank, what's up, campaigning for
mayor in, uh, in Fitzgerald, Georgia, which is a Republican conservative town.
And it's like he's a communist, and he's well liked in his community.
And, you know, he's a good member of his community.
And, you know, so basically what happened is that he didn't have resources.
He wasn't campaigning with, like, money, but anything close to what his opponents had. And he was just straight up going word of mouth. So he wasn't like launching this giant canvassing campaign necessarily. It was a very modest in size, very small scale kind of thing. And it was an interesting
kind of test run, I guess, for future endeavors like this that we may do as a party.
Because we didn't do this as a party.
He was just doing it all by himself.
But he joined the party, you know?
He later on, and kind of like in the middle of it, he joined the party.
And the reason we didn't give a flat-out public endorsement
is because we didn't think a flat out public endorsement is because
we didn't think the odds
were very high that he could win
and that we couldn't commit
the resources, the manpower
because it's just there was no way we could
possibly make it more
probable or make it more likely within the short time
span regardless, right? And that's just a fact. Now, here's the thing. I was given information,
which was an honest mistake, but it was information that had led me to believe that he had a shot.
You know, he actually had a shot and that, you know, it'll be close or he'll potentially even win
and he didn't.
He got
about 7%
of the vote.
Which, you know, look, it's a small Republican
town. It's about a hundred random people a hundred
random people who aren't communists voted for him just because they liked him and they liked
what he was saying which you know is not nothing it's It's honestly, it's not, it's not nothing, okay.
Now, why am I even bringing this up?
Well, because, uh, I was going to cover it and I was going to cover the...
I didn't think it was guaranteed at all he would win.
I just...
You know, we were given some incorrect information.
Like a week before this happened, we were given incorrect information. Before then, we had a pretty realistic, clear view about it. But just like a week ago or so, we were given mistaken information. But why am I talking about this?
Because the smart thing to do is just to not even talk about this, right?
And the smart thing for me to do would have been like,
the thing I was hyping up is something else.
But you know what?
I'm a Maoist.
I want to do this in the spirit of Mao and actually talk about this.
So look,
Comrade Brigham is in very, very poor spirits.
He's in very poor spirits.
And he just,
he's devastated. I mean,
he is shocked. Like,
he is genuinely shocked and devastated. I mean, he is shocked. Like, he is genuinely shocked and devastated.
And he just, like,
had no idea it was going to be, like,
this bad and this severe.
You know, he, he was actually expecting
that this was going to be close, at least,
based on what he was saying from his experiences on the ground
and, you know, how much positive reception he was getting
and so on and how well-known he was.
I mean, there were some of our comrades that had went down to
Fitzgerald, and they did, they did contact the local community, and they did meet a lot of people,
and a lot of people came up to him. They made a very good impression. They were popular. People liked them. People liked him. They liked what he was saying, apparently. But, you know, instead of despairing, in the spirit of Mao, I want to actually talk about, what should we walk away from this from a
critical perspective, you know?
Because this campaign wasn't organized
by our party at all.
And,
um,
you know, I don't want...
Instead of him being demoralized, you know, I think the correct thing is to kind of walk away...
I think there should be a critical reflection, you know?
And my two sense is this.
And this is kind of, this is relevant for, this is relevant for ACP for a party, right?
Because I want to say this, there is a broad tendency of,'s call it marxism leninism um like i don't know um traditional style or o g style so to speak, right?
The classical kind in Western countries,
where people are not too fond of like the culture war stuff, they're not fond of like
the woke stuff and things like that.
And that's fine.
But the problem is that it's insufficiently developed in the sense that, like, it leaves room for something I want to call naive cultural realism, right? Where basically you are not embracing the new era that we live in. And I'm not talking about that when it comes to progressive cultural values. I'm talking about that in terms of how the new era, the information
age we live in, has just fundamentally disrupted and changed the nature of how culture,
consciousness, and socialization occurs. And like, you can drop the woke, but that, you know, sometimes wokes can out maneuver you in terms of how advanced they are just because at least they're a little more in tune with like, like being grounded in reality to some extent.
You know what I mean?
What I'm trying to say is that I notice a tendency among like the, the type of MLs that's just like,
I just want to be like a strict Orthodox ML, like a classic ML,
where they,
they, um, they're guilty of ideology.
It's a problem of ideology, you know?
People are like, what the fuck are you even coming at this from
and I'll explain it okay
when I'm basically trying to say
is that
the attitude
that postmodernism
is just a bunch of bullshit
and we need to just go down and back to our, you know, back to
naive realism, uh, is absolutely fundamentally wrong and mistaken. Like, fundamentally
mistaken view.
And actually, in a sense, I'm not going to say this in a politically accusatory way, but more in a general kind of way, right?
Infra, it's reactionary, you know?
Because you're not embracing, you're not accepting the essence of the new era.
That doesn't mean you have to follow every stupid new trend, but it does mean you cannot retreat from the world and live in an ideological cope world of delusion. You can't put on, you know, LARP outfits,
like, unironically and be like, I revolt against the modern world. Let's return to the time when we didn't have to deal with all this, you know, new challenges that we face as a civilization and a society. And it's like, that's what I think is fundamentally problematic. And I also think that ideology in general, and it's not just communist ideology, it's all ideology, all ideology in general, has this effect where when you retreat into it at the expense of the world, this is actually especially true for Marxism, if I'm going to be honest, because like, there's a certain type of, like, naive cultural realist Marxism, which basically says, I could just go directly to the masses and directly to the people. I can know what the people and the masses are based on my personal interactions with them. And that we need to be offline instead of being terminally online, we need to go offline and just personally on a personal level, make friends with as many people as we can.
And in this way, we have a pulse on the attitude and spirit of the masses.
And absolutely not. The terminally online aspect of civilization is a fundamental part of civilization you know and you
you cannot bypass it and retreat back into the world of interpersonal, you know, immediacy and interactions at that level.
And I think what was happening in Fitzgerald was that. There was an incorrect appraisal about the prospects of winning the race based on the positive reception that came with all of these different kind of immediate personal, like touching grass interactions. There wasn't a sufficient degree of abstraction and an insight into the
abstract and alienating dimension of scale scale is alienating okay scale means it doesn't matter what you're, the human faces.
It's the fucking numbers, right?
That's scale.
Scale is like it's the numbers.
It's a complete opposite of the romanticism
of personability
the complete opposite of the romanticism
well I'm just a good old local
you can't do
come on that's LARP you can't do that
you need to be fucking. You need to be
fucking ruthless. You need to be ruthlessly
alien in a sense.
You need to absolutely be realistic
yeah, in the postmodern
sense, okay?
You need to be realistic in the sense
that you understand that every ideology is not directly the same thing as reality, including communism, including Marxism, Leninism, is not directly just reality.
Some MLs will say, why are you an ML?
And let's be like, well, because it's just directly reality.
That is not true.
That was never true.
Historically, to be a marxist leninist was something that the the reality that tempered and you know continuously affirmed that outlook was the culture of the party that you were in a party that was working in a specific way.
It was a working environment, so to speak. And that was the material source of that outlook's reality, right?
Um... that outlooks reality right um but everyone always understood that it's not directly reality it's of course it's not directly reality there's all sorts of delusions and fantasies and ideological biases and sometimes
these are not even political furries genuinely think that there are spirit animals or something like
they genuinely think that like they literally think that for them that's directly reality and these are ways of insulating
ourselves from reality these are ways of insulating ourselves from the alienating cold dimension
the brutality of the world the brutality of existence the brutality of the world, the brutality of existence, the brutality of reality.
And nobody should be insulating themselves, whether it's through an ideology, whether it's through any kind of other hug box, whether it's through a religion.
Nobody should be insulating themselves from the brutality of the real.
And that's really where I'm coming from.
To be a, I'll say this, I say this unabashedly.
I have faith in the revolutionary cause even before Marxism, which is literally true.
Revolution is what is objective.
What dialectics talks about that's the actual objective thing
it's a brutality of existence
it's a brutality of reality
that constantly disrupts
all comfort zones
all senses of of conce, of safety, all determinate established things
will be brought to the mercy of their real premises. And that is a brutal, revolutionary
violence of existence. The movement of the heavenly bodies is compelled by a violent revolutionary principle.
And if there appears to be harmony in the cosmos, like, for example, our so-called solar system,
this is nothing more than a consequence of a very violent encounter between opposing and contrary forces that gives the appearance of stability and order.
And Marxism is the method that is born of the revolutionary faith. Okay. The faith is not in an ideology. You can't have faith in an ideology. Hell, it's not even a faith in the revolution. It's more like an atteness, an atteness to the brutality of existence and reality. It's the real.
You can run from it.
You can hide from it.
You can cope in the face from it.
Or you can accept it.
And you can recognize it.
Be as revolutionary as reality itself if you see postmodern capitalism as alienating as brutal as as violent with respect to your sensibilities and your comfort zone you need to be even more revolutionary than that. You don't retreat into a hug box. Now, I'm not critiquing, you know, comrade Brigham here. I'm not like
directing all this at him specifically. I'm directing this at a specific modality of sensibility with respect, or specific mode of
sensibility, I should say, with respect to how we articulate what it means to be a communist in the 21st century and in this world,
no one can ever defer to the masses and say, well, the masses are with me.
No, what are the masses?
The masses are not your your your
family your neighbors your friends and your community I'm sorry they're not the
masses are masses they exist at scale if you don't want the coldness and
ruthlessness of that abstraction then name, simply name them all as individuals.
And it's in this sense that I say,
revolutionary first,
you know, ideology second.
Because revolution is the objective fact.
The world of constant movement and motion.
That is just true.
It doesn't matter what your ideas are.
It doesn't matter what your fantasies are, what your desires are. Everything that exists deserve to perish as Goet, whatever the fuck his name is. How do I say the German guy's name? I'm sorry, I'm a verbal Philistine. I only know how to fucking read.
I don't know how to pronounce everything.
How do I pronounce him?
G-O-E-T-H-E. Gerta.
Okay, his name is Gerta.
Gerta. Okay, Gerta.
Okay, now this guy's saying Geta. Okay, whatever. Whatever.
That guy.
Ling La, what's up? Appreciate you.
My critique of ideology is not based in naive realism. My critique of ideology is not based in naive realism.
My critique of ideology is based in a different kind of realism, a different kind of
principle of realism.
One that is, yes, dialectical.
But dialectics isn't philosophy.
Dialectics is not a relationship between concepts.
Dialectics is first and foremost the insight into contradictions.
Before thoughts, before ideas, before any of that exists,
reality is suspended in motion,
in revolutionary motion.
Because it's not only motion,
it's a motion that returns to place, you know, that, that, that, that, that, that returns, and it returns differently, right? This is the essence of a revolution. Returning to place, but what is returning is not what appears as what was before it's still the same
thing in essence it's the same essence only if we regard the essence as a relationship, a contradictory relationship,
the only thing that is real, the only
determination that is real, right, is the relation
of opposites? In any case, I'm ever talking
about the Economic Reich Minister? I'm talking about the fucking poet. The poet.
G-O-E-T-H-E.
If I'm even fucking spelling it right.
No, G-O- yeah, G-O-E-T-H-E.
Yeah, that's how you, how do I fucking say his name?
I don't know.
I only know how to read it.
Gerta.
Okay, Gerta.
Got it.
Fuck.
What form of Marxism would exist in post-modernity?
Can I tell you the type of Marxism I'm on, you know? The type of Marxism that I'm on is...
At some point in my life, I realized how stupid subjectivism was in the sense that, like, you know, the entire basis of Cartesian modernity is being overtaken by a new epoch of humanity,
the Chinese era.
I talked about
this in my early streams a lot.
This is OG infrared shit, right?
I talked about how, you know,
classical modernity is over.
There's a new metaphysical horizon, so to speak, completely supplants
everything we know about objects and subjects and so on and so on. And I came to that kind of
realization, though, that the truth is, I came to that kind of realization though that
the truth is
like
true revolutionary
nosis so to speak
is do nothing and win
like people underestimate this but I spent a great is do nothing and win.
Like people underestimate this, but I spent a great deal of my time before I was ever public,
very much immersing myself in Chinese Marxism and in Chinese philosophy and
history
and the
Chinese way
of looking at
things in
general
you know
so at a
certain point
and also
Xi Jinping
there was a
profound faith
and confidence
I had in
Xi Jinping
you know I was thinking to myself America is There was a profound faith and confidence I had in Xi Jinping.
And I was thinking to myself, America is destined for a long night.
China is ascendant.
Everything will be fine.
Everything will be okay.
I no longer felt any kind of urgency to act, you know, no revolutionary excitement, because nothing is more revolutionary than reality itself. And I found it beautiful how reality by itself is so revolutionary and so ruthless that it falls back into place and it harmoniously reconciles contradictions by virtue of its being and that that is something that belongs to being. It's not something we have to will into existence because we wish it so, because we desire it so. Now, keep in mind, this is like a long period of reflection about the history of
Marxism like China's cultural revolution
and the existential
questions raised by it like
the contradiction between
our moral
sentiments
that are attached to communism and our disappointments from me we want to be good
we want things to be good but then everything gets disappointed disappointing what if reality
disappoints us can we trust reality can we trust the masses we we trust the masses? We talk about the masses,
but what if the masses don't agree with us? What if they don't share our convictions? Or what if,
instead of contradicting our convictions, they simply exist in a state of antecedence with respect to our ideas, such that our ideas can't account for them.
Isn't that pretty traumatic?
It's a chaos, you you know the masses are chaos it's a chaos reality is a chaos you know and should we build a refuge it does being on the left does being a marxist build we mean we build a refuge, does being on the left, does being a
Marxist
build,
we mean we
build a
refuge at the
expense of
reality through
political
correctness,
you know,
through institutions,
through gatekeeping,
through,
through,
you know,
collectively
deluding
ourselves
about what reality is and making sure to pretend like we don't
find certain jokes funny and stuff.
Should we performatively aspire to be what we regard as the good, even if it comes at the expense of how we actually feel?
So these are the kind of like deep questions that, which are stupid when I describe them, of course, but on a much, try to elongate that and think about the logical consequences of this kind of line of inquiry and how much it can really take you down a rabbit
rule, right?
Anyway, eventually I came to the conclusion, though, which was a conclusion that I found adequate
and fulfilling at the mental level, at the level of my consciousness, at the level of my feeling, at the level of my sensibility.
Like, do nothing win.
You know, I don't have to be a revolutionary adventure.
I could just be a normal guy
who's just going to go to law school.
I'm just going to live a normal life,
have a normal family.
And this would be the ultimate form of Tequia.
You know?
Because I'm just going to blend in
with society with this wink-wink secret knowledge in my head
that society is going to be submitted to the mercy of a very, very profound revolutionary changes.
Corvitt, what's up?
Not even necessarily on account of anyone's political will,
but just because of the nature of how the world is changing,
how the mode of production is changing,
how socialism or communism will be victorious
because we're already living in it, in a sense,
and that everything will simply fall into place, led by Xi Jinping and led by China.
Everything will be fine.
So... everything will be fine. So,
like,
everything's fine.
Like I know this,
a lot of serenity came with this kind of
gnosis,
this enlightenment on my part.
And I had completely abandoned any kind of nois, this enlightenment on my part. And I had completely abandoned any kind of aspiration for intervening in reality at all, let
alone talking, okay, to other people about my views and spreading the evangelizing and spreading the message.
I thought all that is so stupid.
It's so stupid because why?
I mean, you speak, you give it to the world, and it comes out the wrong direction.
You know, in other words, to put it in less vulgar terms, I guess, you speak to the world
and you destroy what you wanted and intended to communicate by doing so
by pretending to communicate by pretending like the subject of communication is unlimited and undefined when it is in fact defined
you know i could speak into the void and say to it to whomever it may concern but we know only
some people are going to receive that message based not on some universal
commitment to reason or curiosity, but because they come from a specific demographic or background
or some kind of material disposition or bias to incline them to agree with you.
And that not cultivating that intentionally, right, is just a waste. I mean, why do you, what is it? And this is something it mean why why do you what is it
and this is something
it's so
like what is it
about human
nature that compels
people
for example
to just kind of
like
spill their heart
out to the world.
You notice it takes people more effort to just shut the fuck up than to like spill their heart out to the world.
If you think something that contradicts what you're told, for some reason, your first instinct is just run to the hills and scream it on top of the mountaintops.
Young Soviet, what's up?
Instead of, you know who you should scream it to?
Yourself.
You should tell yourself what you intend to tell others and measure it up to something.
Tell yourself and ask yourself, what could you respond?
Do what Plato did
in his
in his dialogues
respond to yourself
you know
put on a puppet show
okay this is
this is what I want to scream to the world
okay well
hypothetically
to play the devil's advocate,
this is how I could respond. That's how you
develop dialectics.
You understand?
Because a lot of times,
most communists within the past 30 or 40 years, you are screaming to the mountaintops and telling society, they already gave you their response. And you went no further than that. And you retreated back.
You went and gave them your response.
And what did you do?
You retreated back and you said, these people are brainwashed.
These people are reactionaries.
These people are chauvinistic.
These people are bigoted. And you went back into some fucking hug box and made an excuse for the fact that your dialectic is undeveloped. That it's unrefined. That it's untested. That it's not lindy, that it's not anti-fragile, right?
It's a frat, you have a fragile dialectical proposition that is immediately shot down by the world.
And instead of developing your proposition, you condemn the world itself.
Your first mistake was seeking validation and approval from the second term of the dialectical interaction through the world. If you want to address the world,
address the world with a principle
that has already gone through the crucible
of some kind of dialectical conflict.
Address the world with something
that has gone through it,
that has anticipated the response of the world,
that accounts for the contradictions within the world.
In any case, I don't want to keep rambling about this.
In any case, I had come to a position of a very,
a position which I think, to be honest, even most of you now in this community
if you discovered it tomorrow
I could already anticipate you'd be like
damn I'm enlightened I've reached
gnosis and it's like well
you're five six years behind
right
position that I think is mature and advantage you're five, six years behind, right?
Position that I think is mature and advanced with respect to almost all existing ideological sensibilities and sentiments and so on. I mean, I sound like a douchebag. I don't do a fuck.
Genuinely what I think.
Anyway, so what changed?
Why did I commit the cardinal sin and hit this live button and start screaming at the world?
Why did I do that?
Like, why did I, why did I fucking do that?
Why did I, like,
just decide one day,
could I not help it?
Was there something
unconscious that compelled me
to do this?
Did I need
to talk to the world
and share my views.
I mean, do nothing happen, right?
So, like, why did I feel like I needed to make an intervention in reality?
Well, when I give people this answer, and I always do, they never fucking understand.
Okay, one person got it.
And I'm surprised that they got it.
Precisely at the moment that I felt like
I was subjectively at peace with the world
mentally and whatever
as a communist
like I was just okay
like everything's gonna be fine
I don't need
it's I genuinely like optimistic and not in a naive sense, but in, like, I'm at peace.
Let's say when I found peace, right?
Precisely at that moment, and I was in the middle of law school and, like, everything, whatever.
I'm on course for a normal normal life
um my physical nervous system started revolting against me in a way that i literally had no control over for the first time in my life
i just could not sleep like i straight up stopped being able to sleep.
And the more I think about it, the more I, like, understand why that is.
I read about how Mao couldn't sleep.
Do you know Mao couldn't sleep?
And he was, like, taking sleeping pills a lot.
And... a lot and
the most advanced
Marxism
Leninism thus far
the Chinese kind
in its most brilliant or I should say its most dramatic manifestation, during the culture of Luzian, it was a restless dialectic, restless, the continuous intensity of infinite multitudes of contradictions
of contradictions you know,
articulate it as a single
reality. I mean, this
is what the dragon is, by the way.
And, um, but how do you sleep?
That was the question the cultural revolution couldn't answer.
Only the cultural revolution
could not
address the question of how do
communist sleep?
Because it's a constant continuous state of wakefulness awareness consciousness comprehension you, of the dragon, of the contradictory and revolutionary nature of existence, continuously imposed and grasped and seized upon by a wrathful angry consciousness, right? This is Chinese Marxism, really, it is, in a stupid way that I'm putting it in a stupid way, but it's relevant to what I'm trying to say.
So, um, the only way
China was able to rest,
it had to force.
See, this is, you know what I think is an often overlooked fact about Chinese communism or Chinese Marxism in its history. Many people from the West will make the wrong
conclusion that during the Cultural Revolution, everyone had to constantly impose and force upon
themselves ideology, right?
We have to constantly sing the
songs, we have to constantly
shout the slogans,
but secretly, we
don't like doing it.
It's not how we feel.
We don't want to do it, but we're only doing it because of, you know, it's, we're only doing it because of political belief, you know, and it's not sincere. And that Deng Xiaoping finally opened up by just allowing people to breathe and just, okay, now I can finally just be myself and and, uh, and, and, and whatever, let go.
Actually, the opposite is true the thing that was the most seductive and compelling and intoxicating and enjoyable and just so easy to just
fucking take hold of your mind and it's so seamless was the revolutionary
I mean the spiritual activation of the chinese masses during the cultural revolution to this day is of a much higher quality of enjoyment and conscious how should i put it fulfillment
than all the consumer goods
and luxury brands and all that stuff that
exists in China today
there is a much much
there is such an acuity and
intensity of the
fulfillment of the spirit,
you know, of really was something
that fulfilled people
and something that almost intoxicated
and it was something addicting.
The revolutionary passion of the cultural revolution was more compelling and could take hold and seize hold it was more tempting could seize hold of the consciousness of the masses far more
effectively and far more
intensively
than all of the Western consumers
bullshit McDonald's and Gucci.
That's why, you know, when you study
the Chinese post-Deng Xiaoping consumer culture, even I see that, I saw this in Beijing myself. I mean, you say, well, you're extrapolating too much. Well, okay, look, see if my bullshit squares with anything you've ever observed, okay, in that case.
Chinese people have a kind of somber attitude to the consumerism, where they will consume.
They will try the McDonald's and they'll get consumer goods, but it's a kind of somber, almost indifference. I would rather say it's an indifference that they have. It's not a libidinal intensity of fanaticism, of an extreme degree of subjective engagement.
The kind of Chinese consumerism, as much as it might be status driven and so on and so on is very much something somber and calm compared to the frenzy of the cultural revolution for sure meaning McDonald's has not taken over the consciousness of the mind of the Chinese people.
No brand.
Disney hasn't.
Nike hasn't.
Why do you think China didn't become a liberal democracy?
Think about it.
The West penetrated China with all of its soft power, stupid ideology. It about it. The West penetrated China with all of
its soft power, stupid ideology.
It's Disney, it's Coca-Cola,
whatever. The
Chinese were not impressed compared
to the level of subjective
engagement that they had
experienced during the cultural revolution
and never measured up.
It never actually was able
to surmount that, you know?
And people don't understand this
about China, by the way, right?
But why am I going on this rant? Because
what Deng Xiaoping's reform or the post-cultural revolution period, which was necessary, by the way,
I'm not denying its necessity, absolutely was necessary. But what it did was it forced.
It had to force.
It had to impose
the revolutionary outlook it had to force that into the recesses of the chinese unconscious and it had to enforce it into the unconscious it had to repress it forcibly not that so not so it would be
annihilated but so it could finally exist unconscious and the only manifestation of the unconscious is in the dreams
when you're sleeping so the china's night during the reform and opening up period.
The cultural revolution and its kind of ideology was not discarded.
It was repressed into the recesses of the unconscious and all of the consumerism and openness was precisely a way to escape that it was to repress and to escape and distract in a sense, you know?
And that's, that, that, that had to be something, that was the thing that had to be imposed.
That was the thing that had to be like, um,
adopted forcibly in a way, right?
You know, you know what it reminds me of, like I'm going to just say like what an autistic person I am.
Sometimes when I listen to the revolutionary songs from the Chinese period of the cultural revolution and elsewhere.
I find it so compelling and so stirring and so intense.
I don't want to fucking listen to any other music.
I'm like, fuck every other.
Fuck.
Every other song kind of sucks.
Like,
I don't,
like,
this is like,
this shit is so,
like,
motivating.
I'm at the gym.
I fucking lifts my spirits up.
I feel like I can
fucking lift mountains.
It's like,
it's so
intensely compelling, you know?
And it's rousing of the spirit and so on and so on.
But then, you know,
then I can't sleep.
Just like, my, like I straight up can't sleep any.
Like, I'm so activated that I cannot fucking sleep.
So what I do is I force myself to listen to Normie music, and I force myself to listen to stupid, meaningless music just to have an unconscious again.
Just to have an unconscious again just to have an unconscious right so um why am i saying this i'm saying this because
why did i make the decision to intervene into the world, right?
The way that I did.
When I'm saying that it was insomnia and I simply couldn't sleep,
this was the fullest completion of my adoption of Marxism. When I finally adopted Marxism to such a point where on a full subjective level, like I was completely
a communist, like a complete, fulfilled communist, right?
Um,
um,
at that point
um
I could no longer sleep
physically I couldn't
it's not you know I hate I hate saying this because a lot of people go I couldn't. It's not, you know, I hate, I hate saying this because a lot of people go, I couldn't sleep at night. And they're like, well, because I was guilty about, no, no, no, there was nothing wrong with me. There's nothing wrong with me in my head. Okay, I wasn't guilty. I wasn't upset. I wasn't distressed. I was so happy and I was so fine. I literally could just suddenly not sleep anymore and my life became a fucking nightmare. Like all the problems in my life at that point came from the fact that I just couldn't fucking sleep. Like,
everything else was fine. Like, I was in the middle of law school. It was all great. I was, like,
on course for a very great normal life. I couldn't fucking sleep. Like, can you think about that for a second?
Like, you just can't sleep anymore.
Like, imagine if that fucking...
Imagine you're on normie and that just fucking happens to you.
You straight up just can't sleep.
Maybe sometimes you can sleep one or two hours a night.
Very unpleasant sleep, by the way.
But I just couldn't sleep anymore right so that's when i had that aha moment, you know, which was basically like, the reason. The reason I'm, I'm telling you guys the story is because I'm trying to give you advice.
And I'm trying to give you advice in case you are...
I'm observing an error, you know, ideological fanaticism or I should say delusion versus realism.
And I'm trying to share this story to give you an understanding of what does it mean to be a communist actually in the 21st century, right?
So let me continue with this.
I realized that... that um
that um how should I put it
fuck I was thinking about this earlier today
and it
it was so simple to me um the reason i couldn't sleep was because there had been something i got wrong about the dialectic i'll just
simplify it that way i had wholesale internalized fully you you know, Mow's dialectic.
Like, that's just true.
I fully internalized and adopted Mow's dialectic.
Like, I was one with the dragon, you know.
I just couldn't fucking sleep anymore.
So, this led me to slowly realize, not even necessarily,
not even necessarily like on a conscious intellectual level but on a level of like my entire
sensibility my entire outlook of the world and so on of my life of my existence
that Mao's dialectic was incomplete that's what I took my insomnia to mean
Mao's dialectic was not complete there was another term in a dialectical process of reconciliation, which created an irony.
The moment that finally, on an objective level, let's say, you know, socialism triumphs, the good guys win, it's over.
Like, China is ascending.
Xi Jinping is leading the world into a new era.
A new civilization is triumphant and ascendant, and so on and so on.
Communism all along proved itself to be a negation within the dialectic that led to the third term of the reconciliation of civilizations.
We're reawakening after dormancy for so long.
You know, communism guided, lost civilizations to their reawakening, to their self-realization, you know, or so on and so on. I got that wrong, basically. What I neglected, oh, fuck, I sound so crazy right now.
This is, like, so disorganized.
Basically, what I had gotten wrong...
...was... was once you excise the subjectivist element from the revolutionary consciousness and from Marxism, and by subjectivist element, I mean the one that is at odds or at least anxious about reality, the one that is somehow unrereconsiled with reality. Let's just say it that way, which is all Marxism thus far, right? I finally overcame that problem. Okay, finally I'm at peace with reality. my mistake in achieving that piece was assuming that reality
that reality itself doesn't have fangs fangs their subjectivist fangs, that want to intervene and change reality and be bombastic on account of this consciousness and this moral, whatever.
And then I was like, okay, that's gone. Everything will be fine. But then I was like, okay, that's, that's gone.
Everything will be fine. But then
I neglected to realize that
that unruly, subjective
element, for example, the one
we see during the culture revolution
in China, that is proper,
that is something objective itself. Like, that is proper to reality. Not within people's consciousness and in their head, but within their existence, there is a violence that corresponds to it.
It's not a smooth, you know, a peaceful development.
It's a violence.
And I... it's a violence and I shit you not like that moment
like late 2020
early 2021 when I first
like the minute I started hitting live
the entire fucking crazy, you know, hallucination of CPUSA and the American Civil War, that's when it fucking struck me like lightning if myos dialectic is not
finished that means the reconciliation has been an illusion and we are in store for a fuck,
for a lot of fucking fireworks.
Like,
you know,
what does it say in the national anthem and the,
with the rockets or whatever?
Like,
we're in store for that,
for sure.
I mean,
we're in store for a, for sure. I mean, we're in store for a big, bugging storm.
The revolution is happening, and it is going to compel our subject to.
Like, I can't perform to Kia.
I can't just be in law school and be like, I have this knowledge within me about all
these, this new era we're entering into, but I'm going to blend in with society and just be normal because I'll be vindicated anyway and I don't even need to intervene.
I, like, my body literally didn't allow me to fucking do that. Like, I had to expend that distance between myself and the world that I was hiding with
Tequia was too expensive to maintain. I had to squander it. I had to expend it. I had to
somehow articulate it into something I could give back to the world.
You know?
As a matter of physical necessity, I will admit myself as this.
I didn't fucking go live because I'm a, you know, I'm a Messiah and I'm a, I'm such a nice guy and I'm a great revolutionary.
I started, I kept streaming because I literally couldn't sleep otherwise.
The more I would yell and the more I would scream and whatever at the top of my lungs just like
rage on camera I would
sleep soundly
raging on camera literally
was my way of curing my insomnia
that's the only way
I could fucking sleep
you know people don't fucking sleep, you know?
People don't know this, but, you know, the Mongoloid video where I'm, that shit, I slept really well that night.
You know?
I slept really well that night.
And I was an instant...
That day, I had no sleep.
I got all that off my chest.
I slept really fucking well at night.
You know?
So... fucking well at night, you know. So, um,
you know, what I'm trying to say is that, uh,
I did this out of physical necessity.
I probably die otherwise.
Like,
I'm not even kidding.
I couldn't sleep.
People say,
well,
just sleep.
I can't.
I literally tried everything.
I tried every pill.
I tried everything.
I couldn't fucking sleep.
You know?
Um, and that's why I hit the live button. Like, that is the origin of this whole fucking
thing. And, and why am I, Okay, so why am I saying this?
Why am I saying this?
Why am I telling you this?
I guess if there's a lesson in there,
the lesson is
I think
that the body of America
is going to revolt against a peaceful and content mind in the same way mine did against me. And what I think is that there's going to be a stirring within this country, an awakening, an explosive, an explosive conclusion of a long dialectic that will be violent.
And not on our account, not on my account, subject, not on anyone else, it's going to fucking be a storm.
It's going to fucking be a storm it's going to happen like a storm
and
um
everything I acquired such a clarity
in those months
about the future of America
he was like
Haas how do you get this vision
and it you know the truth
I got a very
distorted
vision in a way but a strong clarity of feeling and a distorted vision, you know, about the future of this country.
It's not going to go down into the night peacefully.
It's going to be a fucking storm. It's going to be a fucking storm.
It's going to be a storm.
You know, a very brutal, brutal, ugly, violent, explosive thing.
And maybe this is the projections of an insomnia maybe those are the projections of an insomniac right or or but every time I'm looking at the direction this country is going in I feel like I'm on the mark
I literally feel the civil war happening like at the most visceral level of my nervous system.
It's happening.
You know?
And, um...
I don't know how to explain to people just how much China already won.
In a sense, people don't appreciate yet.
China, been there, done that.
They went through that
cultural revolution and it
it gave them a kind of
civilizational and existential
level of perspective that is just so much more advanced than anything else that exists.
When the Chinese said that we have stood up, when they awoke, when the china awakened after 1949 it did shake the whole world in ways that
make the grand proclamations of its revolutionary era that it's not an exaggeration. China fundamentally
changed humanity and planet Earth. So much so that I could say we are in the West and in America
living in a Gnostic world of illusions. And China has this perception of the true reality that we do not.
And we're living in a world of illusions and inertia.
And China already kind of got it you know they understand and what did China get and I talk
about this in my old streams but China what awakened with China is a new logos.
And if you don't want to call it a logos,
call it where they call it, a new, a Tao.
They awoken, they have awakened to the reality of the Tao the tau is a ruthless ruthless dimension of the contradiction one that is not based on the relationship of concepts nor based on the relationship between substantive empirical objects, as the naive Marxist regarded.
The Tao, Taoist dialectic, if you want to call it that, is a vicious, ruthless, powerful, magnificent dialectic that they unleashed, they somehow tapped into it and allowed it to pulverize and break through the barrier of Anglo-Saxon 17th century metaphysical prison
that humanity was in Chandwin
after modernity.
The Chinese Taoist dialectic of modernity
yeah, it's like in a machine-like way
just completely tore
apart and ravaged
to shreds
tore to shreds
the Anglo-Saxon
metaphysics of the 17th century
and just pulled through it with an intensity and violence
that was seamless seamlessly um thrust it upon the world stage
you know
it smoothly cut through
and um
i think dogan has a good description of the chinese logos by the way the the the dragon so to speak
you know uh anyway let me continue um so they why people ask well why doesn't china do more
for the world and in the world well i'll tell you why because china already
they attained the most advanced and most aggressive and violent in the more refined sense of the word, revolutionary consciousness ever achieved in the history of mankind. They did achieve that. And they did it as a society. The cultural revolution was not
some stupid exercise of elites or intellectuals. It took hold of entirety of Chinese society,
the entirety of Chinese society, the entirety of Chinese society, okay?
And they internalized that. That didn't fucking just disappear. They internalized it. It was taken to the recesses of the Chinese unconscious. And within that unconscious, China's ascendancy has torn through the fabric of the old world
order.
There is nothing more disruptive and violent and revolutionary than that in the past decades. Nothing. So everything you want China to do, so superfluous compared to what they've already done, without even imposing it upon reality as a matter of
subjective conceit by the way civilize the mind make the body savage that's another example of
that dialectic i'm talking about.
These sayings of Mao.
I mean, people do not, they do not appreciate Mao Zedong thought.
There's a lot of stupidity where people are like, well, what's Mousay Dung thought?
That's not,
it's not like Guy Dibord.
Guy Dibord is sophisticated.
Mouser Deng thought is so simple.
Oh my God,
you don't fucking get it.
You really,
we're not gonna fucking make it.
Because you lack the understanding of how much Mao's thinking was an articulation of the entire consciousness of the Chinese civilization, not only at that point, but up to that point, meaning the context of ancient Chinese literature, the classics of Chinese literature, and poetry,
and sensibility and sentiment. This is a very different way of relating to the world and relating to reality.
Even just the Chinese language itself, it's a very fundamentally different way of articulating
being and reality than our way of doing it, the one that we're used to.
And people don't get that.
They don't appreciate it.
Where did China come from? China's taking over the world.
Well, you should humble yourself and study what happened.
Because a lot happened while you were sleeping and mocking China.
You know.
Anyway. you know anyway um
so
uh
but
but
that has happened.
So is it over?
You know, is the whole thing over?
Is it finally complete?
And when I say the whole thing, I mean Marxism, the revolutionary cause, communism, is it just over now you know and no according to my nervous system
no and according to what we see, no, because at every turn of development and change within our country, in terms of how fast things are changing here and how we're responding to this new order
that it has been inadvertently produced as a consequence of China's ascendancy.
How we're adapting to it and responding to it and reacting to it as a country.
It's taking us
deeper and deeper down
the abyss, and it's
imposing upon us an internal
conflict
and confrontation.
That is intensifying.
It is intensifying it is intensifying so why am i telling you this?
I'm telling you this because don't feel the need to impose an ideology on reality.
If you have enough discernment and it's a fucking scary
I think people
people hide behind revolutionary ideology
because they're scared of revolutionary reality.
They would prefer to have strong slogans and strong delusions than confront the dragon itself.
Far more terrifying and scary.
The reality itself is far more revolution and scary. The reality itself is far more revolutionary than any fucking idea or conviction you can hold dear to your heart.
And facing that, facing that is, uh,
face that, don't, don't hide behind ideas, don't hide behind. For God's sake.
Don't run from the alienation you see in the world.
Don't run from being terminally online.
Don't run from the internet. Don't't run from the internet don't fucking run
from culture don't fucking run from anything
don't run from pop music
don't run from popular bullshit
don't fucking run from stupid bullshit
on TikTok don't even run from brain rot
don't fucking insulate yourself
from anything that disturbs and calls into question
and upsets the sensibility and ideas that you're comfortable with. Everything must be
submitted to the test and the crucible. that you're comfortable with. Everything must be submitted
to the test and the crucible
of its most
violent and ruthless opposite
before it can be regarded
and considered as real.
It's not healthy to watch that.
I'm not saying, again, you're misunderstanding me.
Do you know how easy it is for me
to become a red guard
in my consciousness?
Do you know how easy it is for me to shun the world
and shun TikTok,
shun movies and TV and everything and just literally, like be an ascetic Redguard Maoist?
Like, you think that's hard for me?
It's not hard for me.
In fact, it's tempting.
I fight that temptation.
I fight that temptation because it's easier than what I'm doing now.
Which is embracing
the entirety of what reality
is instead of hiding
from it.
You think I was tempted
to become a fucking Twitch streamer?
You think that was tempting for me to be on Twitch
become fucking entertaining and relatable to people
and funny to people and shit and
stream for
just sit there and fucking do stupid shit on Twitch
you think that you think that's like actually
what I find easy it's
as you guys witness
God be my witness as you guys witness
it was really fucking hard
really fucking hard.
Really fucking hard for me. And not
because it's physically demanding or whatever.
It's hard for me to bring myself
to like want to do
that.
What I, what I, what I, what I, what I, what I, what I, what I, what I, what I'm tempted to do is be an ascetic Maoist Red Garden.
Like proverbially, you know.
But tapping into reality and putting yourself at the mercy of the real, in some sense,
and what is the real, by the way?
Well, what the realist, which?
Yeah, in a way it is, because all the real is is the way. Well, what the real is, which? Yeah, in a way it is, because all the real is is the opposing
force with respect to the conceits of your consciousness and the stupid fantasies you create to create a comfortable world for yourself
everything that opposes the world is real everything that opposes your preconceptions is real
everything that forces you out of your comfort zone is real the real is boring increasingly so yes why because it's becoming a hug box
for example in america you don't have you don't have a wilderness of the imaginary anymore.
You have a domesticated familiar face.
You have Netflix.
You have ugly actors and ugly actresses on Netflix to make you feel more content with how you
appear. For example, you have forms of media and consumption and, and streamers that are
telling you what you want to hear and being nice.
All the things,
Groyper's to be comfy and cozy with chicken tendies and chalky milk,
it's bending in that that we're losing.
We're losing our grasp upon the real.
The only thing, the only thing the only thing that is real that is left guess what is what is left because the sheer volume and intensity of culture and media, for example, I'll admit it's not.
Not the culture industry, no, it's no longer a receptacle of the real.
So what is real?
Conflict. White listed, what's up, bro, appreciate you.
Work is real, really? I beg to differ. Most jobs are total bullshit.
Why is the thing with Whiteless not coming through?
Wow, Whiteless with a 25.
Holy fuck, bro.
Thank you.
Any minute now.
There we go.
Whiteless, what's up bro
she shows up on stream labs before
appreciate you bro thank you
the last real thing is conflict
and war
not war necessarily in a armed struggle sense but war in the sense of
irreconcilable contradictions within information.
This continues to be real.
This dimension of the logos continues to be very authentic and very real and very open.
I know AI is shitting everything up,
but AI can't tango in a war, in a discursive war,
information war.
It can't.
It really can't.
I see when my people, haters
or whatever reply with AI, chat, G.B. It's a nothing. This is not opposition to what I'm saying. This is a nothing. This is nothing. This doesn't reflect any kind of authentic dialectical opposition
to my position.
The last real thing
is the conflict.
We must look handsome and beautiful.
No, you're missing the point of what I'm trying to say.
What I'm trying to say is that um what i'm trying to say is that uh what i'm trying to say is that uh there's no retreat that's it
i don't know if this is even useful to some of you but
in terms of what i'm trying to say, but, um... You have to be online.
You have to be online.
You have to be online.
Like, you have to be online. Like, you have to be. Like, you have to be. Like. If you're not online, you know, every time I go to an ACP event, you know how I feel? I feel like, oh, fuck the internet. I'm with my people. This is so much better than that dumb bullshit. I mean, like, we're chilling. But you know what that is? That's just losing perspective. That's losing perspective of the scale within which things are happening.
Because you're immediately experiencing only what's in front of you.
And that's much more pleasant and comfortable than what's going on at scale.
What's going on at scale is really fucked up.
And some people say, well, what's going on at scale doesn't concern me.
I just ignore it and tune out of it.
And that's fine.
You can't do that as a communist.
Our commons as a communist is an unpleasant commons. It's not the commons of when you go in person and meet with people and there's 10 or 20 people and you're all together around a campfire. That's not the fucking commons relevant to the word communism. The commons that is relevant
to the word communism
you know when people go
I hate watching the news, I hate seeing
all the fucked up shit going on in the world
well the fucked up shit that's the
commons relevant to communism
the thing that disturbs your everyday individual
experience of life is what is relevant and should be on the mind and concerning communists.
Who else is going to think about that kind of shit?
Who else is that for to think about?
Who else is going to take responsibility?
When we increasingly start seeing on the news or on X or on social media, killer clown gangs and people in this country fucking massacring each other, who is going to take responsibility?
Or whose problem is that? What crisis
is this a consequence of? How do we make sense of it?
You know, it's people embedded
in pleasantries
that find themselves caught in the worst excesses and atrocities of our current civilization.
People who are not thinking consciously about their relationship to the world.
Master, what's up?
So they offer themselves as receptacles of the prevailing logic of society. The prevailing logic of our society is an abstract logic. If you're not aware of it, you will become possessed by it and you will think about all the hideous fucked up criminals committing all these horrible crimes these people are simple receptacles of the logic of a very sick society.
And they are offline.
The ones that are online are at war, so they think with society.
So we're the only ones that want to take responsibility.
That want to wage a war on behalf of the people for the people
not against them not out of hatred toward them not out of resentment toward them But as a consequence of faith in them.
And who are the people?
The people are precisely those that you will never meet,
that you cannot name, that you do not see,
and that will never know you.
These are my words of wisdom you know I mean Yankee I'm not.
I don't know.
I don't know why you think like you're taking this person. I'm not talking about I don't know why you think, like, you're taking this person.
I'm not talking about you.
Of course, you don't have to be on X if you don't want to be or if you can't be or so.
I'm not...
You're missing the point.
You're missing the point of what I'm trying to say.
What I'm trying to say is that communism is not a safe space from the world.
All the most brutal disappointments, savage inconveniences of the world should be internalized biased continuously.
And only when we have done so can we, in response to that, prevail, prevail you know and assert ourselves against it but you can't
retreat now i i haven't been mentioning comrade brigham or what specific criticism i think would
be relevant for him you know because I wanted to talk more
generally about disappointment and hope as a communist and you have an expectation and reality. So
I'm addressing a more general problem of existential problem of communist the communist outlook.
But regarding Comrade Brigham, I would say, you know, um...
It's never going to be direct.
It's never going to be direct.
It's never going to be direct.
Communism will never directly strike the consciousness of the masses directly.
It's never going to happen.
Simply going down and talking to people and, you know, doing what is right according to a doctrine or something, I mean, it is never going to be direct, you know.
He won, I mean, look, 7% is not nothing, okay?
It's a, it's a Republican, thoroughly Republican town. Okay.
So it's not nothing.
But, you know, simultaneously, in terms of expectations or why there could be disappointment, you know, if those expectations, if you don't achieve those expectations, you have to appraise reality in a much more ruthless way.
You cannot presume the masses are biased in your favor.
Because you have a correct, you seem or you think you have a correct understanding of the situation.
You expect the masses to be on your side because this is the situation, yada, yada, yada.
You may be correct about the situation in terms of what's wrong, but rousing people and mobilizing them to show up for you.
It's a totally different thing. Totally different thing. Totally different thing. No, we did not run a candidate. We did not run a candidate.
There was a comrade who was running that in the middle of or at the end of their campaign joined our party. We did not publicly say anything or endorse anything.
But they are in low spirits as a consequence of the results.
And... the results. And we ourselves were, we, we didn't think their prospects were anywhere close to large, but we had been misinformed because of some mistakes made on the ground there that, you know, his prospects were much higher than they actually were.
So it was just an honest mistake.
He's a good guy, you know.
But, um...
Okay, the...
Again, in the spirit of Mao's self-criticism, okay again
in the spirit of Mao's self
criticism it's like
I'm gonna just
look fucking stupid
right now like
the message I sent about
getting hype and shit
we thought we thought that when the results came in, maybe he wouldn't win, but it would be like, wow, you know, what a great pull.
Like, we were not given accurate information.
And because of honest mistakes, by the way, it wasn't intentional.
But I feel obligated and responsible to explain to you what I was so confident in that I was hyping up that, you know, we would have some exciting news on that front.
But alas, we keep going forward, you know.
And by the way, to be fair, fair i mean our party wasn't really involved with
it in the first place would have been exciting news for sure but it's not something we organized
it's not something we planned for it's not something we strategized for i'm sure if if we had, it would be very different.
But this was one guy by himself with almost no resources.
In the middle of, like, Georgia in the most, one of those conservative towns,
straight up openly as a communist, openly calling himself a communist. Straight up.
Openly as a communist.
Openly calling himself a communist.
Uh, you know, doing this.
So... So yeah.
Anyway, guys, I want to tell you about I'm going to the southeast this weekend or the southeast summit.
I'll be in the South, the American South, I'll be there.
Go to NYC.
I may actually be going to NYC for another debate hosted by the same guy that hosted the
Praxben debate,
Ekmat.
He messes me if I want to debate about China being fascist.
They said, sure.
But there's no debate opponent yet, so we'll see.
But I'd be going to
NYC in that case at the end of the month.
Yeah.
When am I coming in Pennsylvania?
I'd like...
Well, maybe there should be a northeast summit, you know?
Maybe you guys should put together a northeast summit. the Northeast Summit.
There was... No, there wasn't.
It wasn't called the Northeast Summit.
I'll tell you that.
Gettysburg.
I wasn't even invited,
so there you go.
I wasn't get the message.
My bad, I probably overlooked it or something.
So,
guys, once of you found the stream a little bit
insightful, I don't know. Okay, I'm going to try to stream tomorrow, but we'll see.
Okay, I'll try tomorrow.
Anyway, guys, see you when I see you, hopefully, IRL.
All right, y'all.
I'm glad you said this instead of a Mamdani ran.
Oh, yeah.
Momdani won.
New York City's still going to be a shithole,
but now socialism's going to be blamed for that.
So get ready.
Get ready for finally.
Finally, we're going to get some accountability in our society.
So all the dead rats and dead people on the subway and all this shit everywhere and piss everywhere and all the garbage and bullshit
and people running around naked and on
crack and stuff
that's now
now there's going to be accountability
and socialism's to blame
so nothing changed
only this guy who
calls himself a socialist got elected. So suddenly a switch is going to be flipped where, you know, all the problems of New York City that have always existed are going to be blamed on us. So get ready for that.
Guys, anyway, I'll see you guys later.
Bye-bye.
I'll see you guys.
Bye-bye.