Russia's Return to Greatness
2022-04-22
Tags:
Russia's Return to GreatnessRussia's Return Greatness toRussia's to Return GreatnessRussia's to Greatness ReturnRussia's Greatness Return toReturn Greatness to Russia'sReturn Greatness Russia's toto Russia's Return Greatnessto Russia's Greatness Returnto Return Russia's Greatnessto Return Greatness Russia'sto Greatness Russia's Returnto Greatness Return Russia'sGreatness Russia's to ReturnGreatness Russia's Return toGreatness Return to Russia's
all right
okay everybody i prepared a lot for this
stream a lot of shit i have lined up
um
took a little longer than i expected to
get the stream going and get it prepared
and shit
but hopefully we're gonna have a good
four hour stream today a pretty long
stream also decided to change my camera
layout again because um
the old one i just wasn't really liking
it that much
didn't have that same effect
i was looking for
but uh yeah we're back hopefully we have
a good stream today hopefully have a
good time
um you know and i'm streaming wow i
can't believe i'm calling this an early
stream because it's fucking 8 p.m right
i mean the goal
ultimately is to be
having streams at like from 4 to 6 p.m
is when i want to start these streams
and have these streams actually
so
first things first not a lot has
happened between yesterday and today i
did finish that thing i was watching on
netflix
and
you know i'm not gonna really tell you
what i watched i'm not gonna tell you
what it was exactly but um
i was really disappointed
i was really disappointed and uh
it was the first type of show let's just
call it that it was a tv show it was the
first type of show i watched
that was in that format because
everyone's always hyping it up and i was
like i want to know what the hype is
right i don't i don't know why people
like this shit
and what i'm missing because i just in
my life i never was able to come around
to appreciate that that medium
and this was like the most popular one
like this was an extremely extremely
popular
uh show
it's like a cult classic everyone always
talks about it and shit so i i did give
it a chance and it was literally like
the most stupid fucking thing i've ever
watched in my head i i can't believe how
much fucking time i wasted
watching that bullsh like it was so
cringy i'm actually like
super
like pissed off that i wasted so much
time
why it wasn't even that long but like
oh my god what a stupid cringey show
like i i'm even more pissed off because
i've always
hated that medium and i've always talked
shit about that medium right and
everybody's always been telling me shit
like oh has you just got to give it a
chance okay i did give it a chance and
it every not only was everything
confirmed
it's like even it's way worse than i
thought it's just
i i i actually sat through that and to
be fair you know most of the time i was
on my phone
like doing other shit because it was so
fucking boring right
and
i'm actually pissed off about it now
like i'm actually fucking pissed i'm not
gonna tell you what it was because like
it's just embarrassing it's just
embarrassing i mean it's very common
it's not really that embarrassing but
i'm embarrassed that i fucking watched
it because
it was like such a cringey disgusting
experience
you know
it's not really embarrassing it's just
like it's just
oh god it's like it's very popular like
a lot of people are a lot of
intellectuals are like oh this is so
deep this is a really deep show you
gotta really you know it's just it's
just so intellect it's so fucking it's
like stupid psychology tropes and
fucking
is shit like it's like oh it's the
definition of like trying to be it's the
definition of like i'm 14 and this is
deep right but i did think that at the
end there must be some like beautiful
ending
that that somehow justifies this shit
and the ending was so
i skipped half of the ending because i
fast forwarded it
because the second to last episode was
like the most pretentious waste of time
i ever saw and i watched the whole thing
and the last episode was the same thing
so i just fast forwarded like halfway
through it until it got to a part where
it returned to some kind of fucking
story
but um
it's
what up
you know uh i'm i'm laughing and i'm
like i'm a little um jolly and i'm like
joyful and shit right now
um
but
i need i need to understand that in my
heart right now like in my soul
i'm actually
full of a lot of anger because
oh my god this has been it's such like a
big cultural influence in our society
and so many people talk about it and
it's like i knew it was exactly what i
thought it was going to be but everyone
kept telling me now you have to watch it
before you can come i didn't have to
fucking watch it because i already knew
what it was going to be
it makes me pissed off i can't fucking
what a scringy society
all right
what a cringe society
that we live in
and like when i was a kid
i knew i was never into it and i was
like okay maybe i'm an adult now maybe
there's something about being an adult
that makes it better no
no
there's not
all right
i was right as a kid it's shit is just
boring as fuck and lame as fuck
and you know i have a lot of anger about
this i got a lot of i'm like butt hurt
about it you know i'm actually mad
um
and i fucking hate everyone who likes
that shit i just
i am gonna make it personal like i
fucking hate you i actually hate you
i don't like you i would never talk to
you in real life i would never be your
friend
you are so fucking cringed i just got to
i just got a peek of what you like and
what you hold close to your heart
and wow i've i now i judge you like i've
never judged anyone before like i will
never look at you guys ever the same
again i didn't even know what that shit
was before and now that i fucking know
it's like
you should be ashamed of yourself
like you should literally be ashamed of
yourself what the fuck is wrong with you
you guys should do a video on thomas
sankara and burkina faso similar to the
stalin vid keep it up thank you emperor
tanki although i'm gonna say something
that's gonna like piss people off you
know when it comes to thomas sankara who
wait very admirable guy big hero
oh my god how is this rank i'm not
ragging on him i'm just ragging on the
fan base
again he's he's a favorite of these kind
of like tropicalist western leftists who
just love a story of of of someone
losing right
and
you know oh you're gonna love you're
gonna you're not like look don't trust
people who just throw all this praise
and obsess the fandom of sankara because
lol did you watch evangelion thank you
push and pee and thank you tanki don't
um
don't don't trust people who throw all
the he throw heaps of fucking praise
on sankara
when they won't do the same for for
fugabe
or gaddafi
especially mugabe though right
so yeah you got to ask yourself the
question and this is the same topic as i
was talking about with the latin
american all of the fandom of thomas
sankara you see on twitter and the
internet those are the same people who
were against mugabe right
so you gotta like kind of like yeah yeah
it's kind of like that you know
i don't like this i'm sick of this story
of like the virtuous martyr who lost
you know i i
i don't like leftists who do that shit
and you know
there's something so ugly about the
leftist aesthetic there's something so
fucking ugly about it like
uh uh it's the worst type of tanky the
worst type of tanky is the one that's
like oh
it's the luna oy tanky it was like oh in
vietnam
we organize
the fields differently and then shut the
fuck up literally shut the fuck up
i don't even know it's the hakeem
tankies you know the hakeem tankies hey
guys it's me hakeem
so i'm going to be responding to what
prager you said so prageru basically um
i'm not going to tell you what the
fucking show was
because
it's one of those things where it's like
i regret ever watching it in the first
place
like
nothing was all that happened was my
preconceptions were confirmed okay
but anyway hey guys it's me hakeem here
and today i'm going to talk about um
why
socialism is actually workers ownership
workers ownership of the means of
production
uh
a lot of people in chat are give are
showing their asses like you guys are
such fat sweaty nerd fucking losers
and the fact that
like how would you even know you know
like you're such losers
you're such fucking losers
i can't even it could have been anything
but you somehow you knew right
y'all are fucking losers really for real
jesus
um
yeah that
yeah
look at this guy achievement scrubs when
it has that destiny and nick
betty him like that you know what this
comes down to is a cultural difference
like
is that what you think bullying is you
stupid bitch
so for me bullying means i call you a
cuck i say you have gyno and you're a
little bitch
and that's what bullying is right but
for you bullying is like ah
but you never thought about the fact
that indeed just like how you're short
you're literally
you are the guy who watches anime you
are a fucking anime
kid you're the anime kid
that's literally you
that's what you think bullying is you
stupid bitch
fucking band kid
we're not gonna get into it we're not
gonna get into it
these people we're not gonna get into it
right but
i want you all to know i'm an
afro-asiatic
mediterranean male and there's a
cultural bridge between us there's just
a cultural bridge between us how i was
raised with my cousins and all that shit
we that's not how it is that's just not
how it is okay there's a cultural bridge
between us we don't understand each
other even fucking circa based even with
zircon
book i should read thank you dashie even
circa understands like when me and zurka
talk about roasting someone we're on the
same page thank you gavriel when circus
chat talks about someone getting roasted
we all understand each other and we're
on the same page but for some other
communities it's just there's just this
cultural bridge i cannot bridge that
bridge right like y'all don't
sway like
roasting for you is literally witty band
kid humor roasting for me
is
dragon ball z super scion mode dragon
energy
literal fire
fucking spit roast direct
right where i disrespect your manhood to
your face in a direct aggressivity way
but um
yeah you fucking pussy little bitch
the fuck is that guy's name hey why
don't you get in my vc i'll show you
what a roast looks like
oh
bitch
achievement scrubs how about you get in
my vc little bitch
fucking band kid ass pussy
um um i i i i i
i i i shut the fuck up
and um actually and and i don't got time
for that i have solar energy i have
solar afro-asiatic mediterranean male
energy
bitch
why are you so confident right now why
don't you get in my vc little pussy
you're fucking confident enough to type
in my chat you little bitch and you must
not be familiar with who the fuck i am
bitch
you must not be familiar with who the
fuck i am
oh i wasn't confident with nick and
destiny why because i was i was bored as
fuck and i wasn't doing shit because
there was literally no content going on
he was fucking being cringe all by
himself that's me not being fucking
confident you projecting pussy you're
just a projecting pussy how about you
get in my fucking vc and i fuck your
skull how about i fuck
your skull in front of everyone and you
get in my vc do you have the confidence
to withstand me in vc
based
i was the anime kid kaiji is the only
marxist leninist anime i can recommend
for you or chat
oh fi thank you for the 10
but that's just not the move oh yeah and
dashi i'm sorry i uh
i like i uh skipped over your question
but um
the dugan boogie series political
platinism what do you want to debate
i'm just gonna roast the fuck out of you
you're gonna cam up or you're gonna just
talk
and i'm gonna show you what it looks
like to be roasted oh bitch
and you're gonna you're gonna i'm gonna
give you a cultural experience of
cultural exchange how about that
cultural experience of cultural exchange
you get on my vc imma roast the fuck out
of you and then you're gonna see the
difference right
you're gonna see the difference
fucking gyno having little bitch in my
chat
fucking little harry potter ass
motherfucking scar on your forehead
little bitch imma be your lord voldemort
today bitch
and your fucking bitch look like hagrid
bitch fucking harry potter ass
but the best i watch anime
look at this look at this guy you fell
off
does that does that sound like you
getting in my vc
does that sound like vc to me
that don't sound like vc to me it sounds
like you're a pussy
it sounds like you're a pussy to me i
genuinely think you're a pussy
you're genuinely a fucking pussy
what do you want to debate
i want to debate about whether anything
you said
can be verifiable i wanna i wanna debate
about whether anything you've typed in
my chat
can be demonstrated to be true how about
that
see the this is the problem with these
fucking nerds i can play their game i
can play your game i know how to act
like you i look i know how to act like
you understand
i will beat you at your own fucking game
i will beat you at your own game
yeah the perfect example of a beta
yeah anyway
we i have a i have so much to talk about
today like i have not only news to cover
but we're gonna do a deep dive into the
whole
history of the ukraine it's gonna be a
really big thing we're gonna get into
right
but um
you know what i'm
look it's not often i get pissed
visibly
this guy chin is permanently banned from
the chat
and we know what your chin looks like
chin
your perm chin i don't even care if
you're a fucking uh
super patreon sub you are fucking
permanently banned from my chat you
fucking bitch
don't get stun locked
just unlocked when i'm not talking for
four seconds
okay i'm gonna i'm gonna i'm gonna do a
new youtube type of stream i'm not gonna
change how i am for youtube i'm not
gonna change who i am for youtube
so if you're the type
that is waiting for me to like stop
talking for four sec just leave get the
fuck out of my stream right now all of
you i want all the rats to get the fuck
out of my stream i don't care if we go
back to 100 viewers all rats get the
fuck out of my stream scurry away little
bitch
this is not for you
imma talk according to my own pace
and i'm really tempted to do a silent
stream for all four hours i'm really
tempted to do a silent stream for four
hours
i'm really tempted to do a completely
silent stream where i just stare at the
camera for four hours
because i think we're in need of that
level of discipline
we are in need of that level of
discipline because this is disgusting
right
it's actually disgusting
but uh yeah the 300 spartans
but you know i'm gonna be i'm gonna
actually be honest about something
i don't even know if the live streaming
shit on youtube is viable i'm gonna be
honest i don't know if it's viable if we
go back to 200 100 viewers i just may
never stream and just do video content
and do writing content because there's
got to be a demand for it you know i
always say there's just i'm going to
keep doing this for months and months
but there does gotta be a demand for
this shit you know
there's gotta i'm not gonna it's just
too much
it's not enough to make a living off of
at that point you know
it's really not
it's just simple as that it's really not
you know
all right we're gonna have a new rule
ready
mods
literally permanently ban
every single person
who says any type of negativity in my
chat
permanently ban
every single person
who spreads negativity in the chat
every single one
including this guy ylvar
write scripts make video comment and
only stream when you have a lot to say i
just don't feel like
ever hearing your advice again so you're
permanently banned
we need a purge every single negative
thing in this chat
is gone
because in order to grow again we need
to get rid of these fucking
dead weight little bitches holding us
down
you understand purge every single one of
these fucking people we don't want them
we don't need them
get them the fuck out of here
get them the fuck out of you
get them the fuck out of you
when i have that cultural revolution
not a cultural revolution it's a purge
we're gonna have a great purge thank you
what stop streaming
what
what
thank you what
appreciate you
appreciate you so the first thing i
wanted to talk about right
first thing i wanted to talk about is
the fact that we have this thing with uh
addison cawthorn
what kind of content are you making
you know what i don't know what's up
with youtube chat but like there's so
many people in the youtube chat that
just think they have freedom of speech
yeah okay achievement scrubs let's
debate on whether i fell off or not go
ahead get in my fucking vc
little bitch
but there's so many people in my chat
anti-nerd purge who just feel like they
have the right to talk
they just feel like they have the right
to speak
holy fuck lo-fi thank you
do you still intend to do the podcast
with jackson yes samira khan yes i could
increase the demand
yes i do
anyway um
yeah i do
yeah achievement scrubs get in my vc you
fucking pussy
go ahead and get my vc but uh there's
just a lot of people in these chats that
just in this chat like they feel like oh
this no this is a this is the gorilla
army this isn't just somewhere you could
just come and be yourself and get the
fuck out of here bitch go watch richard
medhurst or some shit go watch a fucking
neutral whatever fucking streamer this
is a parasocial community this is a
parasocial
community
this is not open to everyone we don't we
don't just take in anyone in this
fucking street understand
we this is a parasocial type of stream
we this is not open to the public you
have you need vip access to be here it's
not a lounge stupid bitch talking shit
in my chat
anyway
as i was saying is that is that the guy
gonna get in my vc
is that fucking pussy getting my in my
vcr
let's see
no he's a pussy is achievement getting
on my vc or not
something tells me
achievement is gonna bitch out
and not get in my vc
something tells me achievement is gonna
bitch out and not get in my vc
something tells me he's not gonna
in my discord you stupid bitch hurry up
and stop wasting our time
you fucking pussy
damn
damn
look at this
look at this dude trying to make excuses
because he's a pussy
damn damn you have literally 15 seconds
to join the discord 15
14
13
12 11
10
9
8
seven
six
five
four
three
two
one
zero
look at this bitch
so even though ahmad linked it to you in
the chat
even though ahmad literally linked it to
you in the chat
oh you fell off dude you wanna okay you
know what achievement you wanna
challenge me right now so how about in
six months in six months whether i'm 1k
average
six months
will you still say i fell off you stupid
bitch yeah i got d platform dumbass not
gonna have the same amount of fucking
views as i did before you stupid bitch
what are these stupid fucking people
like don't just type shit and run away
i want you to feel the shame of typing
that it's so fucking stupid do you even
think what the fuck
and then people go and then people go um
um oh look at this jilly love yikes i'm
out
please on your way out
slip on a banana peel and break your
head in a video game
okay
and never come back ever literally never
come back ever and you can't either
because you're fucking banned
anyway let me tell you guys something
let me tell you guys something i'm sick
of these dumb fucks who go on the
internet and freely
they freely out of their own time
no one is forcing them to do this shit
based on their own fucking free will and
out of their own time
type bullshit in my chat
say stupid fucking things
and then when i give them a response
thank you uh mac appreciate you i'm new
but boy i like you do you think thank
you meg appreciate you and then
appreciate you so much man holy shit and
then when i do this shit where it's like
when i give them the reaction deserving
of that level of stupidity they go oh my
god
you are you you you get so angry so
easily
you are literally a dumb fuck
you don't understand
that my reaction is proportionate to
your fucking stupidity and your stup you
should feel so much shame that you
should call your mother crying
and asking her what went wrong
just ban him to the exit holy shit thank
you soul i appreciate you so much
appreciate you so much but you should
literally call your mother crying about
what a dumb fuck
you are and ask her what went wrong with
me why did you raise me to be this way
what about you is respond and you should
maybe you should blame your parents i
don't know blame somebody but you are a
stupid fuck you are literally a stupid
fuck
yeah emirio you emirio prove it you in
the first place in the uh
you know you got a lot of imposters in
this fucking chat so yeah you can't even
you can't even uh reliably know who's
even fucking real right so you gotta
go in the discord and uh
that kind of shit
but damn i don't this is not let me tell
you all something this is not a
respectable
i'm not part of that sphere of the
internet you come i don't know where the
fuck you come from that's not my shit i
am not like you
anybody who has a problem with this me
getting angry shit i don't i'm not like
you i don't
yo get the fuck out of here go watch
someone else go watch a a polite
respectable person that's not me
damn
[Music]
this is realness here we we have
realness here you're a fake little bitch
so get the fuck out
damn
damn
i don't want these these fucking uh you
know
oh um
actually huh shut the fuck up
damn
damn and people act like i'm the one
who's crazy i'm crazy
no what's crazy is that you woke up
and
really typed stupid shit in my chat
as if oh what that's just nature that i
just overlooked that like i overlooked
nature no
you need to be shamed you need to be
called out
you're dumb as fuck
added me in the discord
you didn't
oh emirio okay emirio i'm gonna mod you
emirio i'm mirio amerio where the fuck
are you
emirio
where the fuck are you
there you go
add mod
there you go
based thank you zach zolco you got
dedication
thank you zack soka appreciate you
appreciate you
you know okay you know what you know
what there is i'm gonna talk about this
internet problem right there's this
internet thing
where
rev again don't at me in the fucking
chat at me in the discord and tell me
what your name is i don't know i don't
know if you're real look there's this
thing on the internet where people have
this uh the default
the default type of psychological state
is just being like
this is the reddit stare i'm gonna i'm
gonna introduce a new concept it's
called the reddit stare right there's
different temperaments on the internet
and one of them is the thing where like
the only normal cool person is the
person with the reddit stare
everything we do every joke we make
every action we take is to return to the
reddit stair
i'm normal i'm normal no bitch
that's not us
that's not us we yell over here we get
angry over here we're hot tempered over
here and we're passionate over here
bitch we don't have that reddit stare
like you
literally suck my cock suck my fucking
cock for
real and by the way that's why they d
platinum for me from fucking everything
that's why stream labs d-platform me
that's why stream elements d-platforming
cause i'm unapologetic about it
i'm unapologetic about it
i'm not like you
i'm not like you
i don't just say i want putin
to take ukraine
i don't just say that putin was
justified in taking ukraine
i'm saying putin would be justified in
taking can canada
that's why
and i'm serious about that
i'm actually serious about that
yeah
yeah
he should take canada
now you know what i just i'm i'm this is
a new resolution because i've been
thinking about this shit
i've really been thinking about this
shit i am not gonna adjust to youtube
youtube is gonna adjust to me
you understand i'm not gonna change who
the fuck i am for youtube youtube's
going to change for me
i can't do this shit where i just
sitting here and being professional i
can have a professional setup and i can
be
thank you eyes on green appreciate you
so much man for the warchest khan don't
worry the anti-anime community still
considers you a benchmark leader
evangelion is everything that's wrong
with pseudo intellectuals online thank
you eyes on green
go insane for ukraine the platformers
deserve the pain but just in a video
game thank you alex appreciate you man
and yeah
i'm gonna say something there's
something on the internet called an
anime intellectual and these people
need to work in boot camp so i don't
know if we're allowed to say gulags but
we can say boot camp so all the anime
people need to go to boot camp all anime
intellectuals have to go to boot camp
that's where they belong boot camp
that's where the anime intellectual
belongs
okay
boot camp
and i'm not joking that's not a joke i
actually believe that by the way
um all right so here's here's what okay
we a lot of distractions and shit here's
what i wanted to talk about today right
here's what i wanted to talk about so
there's
a
currently right now i used i talked
about this on twitch i don't know if you
guys saw that stream
but i can't do a full recap about it
unfortunately let me pull this up
i can't do a full recap about what i
covered on twitch
but i'm sure most of you remembered it
the reason i think most of you
remembered it actually
is because
most of you are the same people that
were watching me on twitch right most of
you right so you guys probably remember
the time i covered madison cawthorne and
how i commended his bravery
uh in being able to expose
the republican establishment
so madison cawthorne
the republican establishment
he exposed you know
he exposed them further they're engaging
in debauchery and orgies and all this
sick twisted shit and being a bunch of
fucking hypocrites and i commend him for
that and we commanded him for that and
he deserves to be commended right but by
doing that madison conform made a lot of
enemies right he made so many enemies
actually
that he started to be trending on
twitter today right
and the reason he was uh trending on
twitter actually
was
how the fuck does this have stupid shit
happen man
like
every stupid fucking thing man
all right
and the reason for that right
okay there we go
the reason for that is um
so according to former finance uh former
campaign uh
staffers on his campaign so the same
people that helped hawthorne get elected
and we can imagine that those people
come from the republican establishment
one way or another or their ambassadors
who were sent down from them right they
decided to leak
from hawthorne
supposedly and this is the well i saw
the photo right they decided to leak
this dumb photo right it's like a
complete nothing burger
you know i'm gonna talk about this
because
i i really don't get how some people
take the bait when it comes to this shit
it was like this photo of cawthorne
i almost kind of want to show it to you
okay should i just show it to you i'm
gonna show it to you fuck it i was gonna
like not show it out of respect for him
but it's such a nothing burger
that i'm just gonna show it to you just
to show you like
you're like okay cawthorne was caught
wearing women's ling
lingerie
he was caught wearing women's lingerie
so the republican fucking um
establishment is the one who's behind
this fucking uh smear campaign against
his image because he fucking exposed
them right so this is the women's
lingerie that madison called thorn was
wearing and you you're gonna think this
is super degenerate and like oh my god i
mean this is really bad this is really
bad right well this is all it fucking
was here you go
oh my god you know what this is this is
a chad
who's
hanging out with you know i don't know
if this is his mother i don't know who
the fuck this is women
and you know they're clearly drinking
and he's just they're just having a fun
time and it's literally a nothing burger
and no he's not wearing women's lingerie
because he's wearing his own fucking
actually i can't even tell i don't even
know what the fuck he's wearing right
who gives a fuck
who gives a fuck
it's it's the biggest nothing burger
i've ever seen in my fucking life
if this is if this was just a normal
photo on his facebook who would give a
fuck now you some people may be like but
but cawthor imposters as a conservative
and as a traditional conservative male
um
yeah but he's also 20 what is he like 25
years old so he's also 25 years old and
this is not
that bad this is like not really i mean
this isn't the this wouldn't be like the
symbol of a conservative male
per se
but like this is not really that out of
the ordinary for like
you know i mean even you know holy shit
like you don't think fucking jordan
peterson was having fun at 25 just
fucking around a little bit i mean this
is nothing but because um can i say the
r word on youtube can i say that word
anyone know if i could say that word
because i really want to talk about how
there's this issue of people who are um
differently abled
who can't tell the fucking difference oh
so
it would be okay if there was a a sex
tape leaked of cothorn where he was
getting pegged by another man
no because it's not the same thing
and you must have some disability if
you're not able to fucking understand
that
this isn't cross-dressing these are
women he's with while drinking and
they're just fooling around and i don't
mean fooling around in a even in a dirty
way it's just they're just joking around
they're just clowning he's okay madison
cawthorne is clowning around with some
women
he's clowning around with some women at
a party
that's it this is the biggest fucking
nothing burger i've ever seen in my
fucking life he's 25 years old who gives
a fuck and the shit that he was alleging
that the conservative politicians were
doing was way fucking worse
those people are old creepy fuck men who
are in orgies doing drugs there's a
really big difference between that
and this nothing burger right here which
is not it shouldn't even be fucking news
okay and by the way
just to be fucking clear
the amount of butt hurt spite driven
rage behind
the
media reporting on this shit and like
them making it go viral actually makes
me sick to my fucking stomach so some
old pedo fuck who caught thorn exposed i
don't mind calling them that because we
know that they're probably involved in
that kind of shit too
so some old creepy fuck was like oh
we're gonna get caughthorn back fire
everything search everything look for
the worst possible thing in this guy's
past that could be the most embarrassing
thing ever and this is all they could
come up with
this is the
only thing they could they could come up
with it's literally nothing
it's
there's there's nothing it's there's
literally nothing here
and then you know here's here's what
actually disgusts me and this is what's
something like no one's talking about
this right which is like it's the way
leftists progressives liberals and these
fucking republican establishment pieces
of shit lincoln project people and the
rest of those people they're all
coalescing around attacking cauthor so
the original publication that um broke
this story let me look up who exactly
did it again
it was who was the first it was politico
yeah
politico was the first
to do this okay so where does politico
lean on the political spectrum where do
you think politico leans on the
political spectrum politico is a
left-leaning
libtard magazine right so that's
political
and yet they're
they're um doing dirty work and they're
engaging in this hatchet job
on behalf of the republican
establishment wait a fucking second so
i'm smeared as a republican a lot of the
times because i'm reaching out to
populists all over and i reach out to
everybody so they come and smear me as a
fucking republican right but here you
have these lefties and and progressives
and all these fucking people who are
literally doing the hatchet job dirty
work of the republican establishment
i reach out to those very
populistic maga republicans who are
underdogs who by no means represent the
mainstream of the party and who are
pretty much trying to just represent a
new political orientation you know the
jd vance type of people and not even
even even further than that right just
you know just general populist the trump
people whoever the fuck those people are
right those are the people i reach out
to when i talk to you and i have
crossover viewership with and i have
some measure and degree of sympathy with
right
but
these people it's like
you you got to understand it's the
establishment versus the populace it's
the establishment
versus the people like and you want to
know how we can know that is because
when the republican establishment wants
something done the lefties the liberals
the progressives all coalesce around it
and they join hand in hand with the
republican establishment
to smear this
25 year old young man
absolutely despicable
it is just absolutely despicable
so
photographs obtained by politico appear
to show madison cawthorne the embattled
republican congressman from north
carolina recently accused his gop
colleagues of inviting him to orgies
wearing lingerie in what appears to be a
party setting i mean this is so fucking
like
misleading
because like they're trying to make it
seem like he's naked posing in lingerie
or some shit it's not what's going on
right um the revelation of the two
photos
unflattering headline the young member
of congress
yeah and this is the crucial context
it's that on may 17th there's going to
be a primary in north carolina where
several republican
establishment challengers want to
overthrow hawthorne
and politico was acting as the hatchet
job for
doing the fucking dirty work of these
absolutely disgusting scumbags right
um
thorne who was paralyzed from the waist
down in a car accident
he called zalensky a thug that's not a
negative highlight that's not a see this
is really what we're dealing with so
kawthorne had the bravery called
zelinski a thug
he exposed pelosi for being a drunk
and he also
exposed the republican establishment for
engaging in orgies and also all kinds of
sick twisted shit right so as as a form
of revenge uh politico decided to
publish these photos which they
apparently
obtained from where
all right
so they actually this is clawthorne's
response i didn't even know he responded
to them
so he goes i guess the left thinks goofy
vacation photos during a game of on a
cruise
is somehow going to hurt me they're
running out of things to throw at me
share your most embarrassing vacation
pics and the replies
and i'm going to tweet about this
the most despicable part about this is
that it isn't just the left
it's the left
so it's the synthetic left teaming
up with the republican
establishment
to unseat hawthorne ahead of his primary
next month
is the establishment he doesn't even
argue for the abolition of class
okay
can you site can you get in my vc and
cite to me one passage
where marx angles
or even lenin
talk about the abolition of class go
ahead
go ahead and do that for me
and they're trying to say he's a
hypocrite because he's like a
conservative or he's a christian or
whatever
you know and and he also had these
photos published which is like the most
stupid fucking thing i've ever heard
ever because first of all how is it
somehow incompatible between being a
conservative
christian and
going on a cruise and taking goofy
nothing burger photos i mean like that
doesn't sound like that's about being a
conservative it sounds like at that
point
that's just about being
a fundamentalist i don't think hawthorne
ever said he was a fundamentalist like
what are they going to say next i mean
call thorn is
hawthorne watches uh tv shows and movies
at the movie theater that are not
christian in content that means he's a
hypocrite i mean no he's clearly a
normal just because he's a fucking
conservative christian and has
conservative values doesn't fucking mean
he's not a normal human being who has
fun on vacations like yeah i know
they're like sexually harassing the shit
out of him and that's what leftists
fucking do is they make everything
extremely fucking sexual
right
they always make everything so fucking
sexual
i don't see giovanni i don't you keep
spamming me about giovanni i don't see
him
where is giovanni
where is giovanni
where is he at
where is he at i don't see him don't
spam me about somebody when i can't even
okay
all right here he is
giovanni
admon
there you go
all right
um
so that again the most disgusting thing
about this story
is
it's an exam and let's look at it let's
look at some more examples of this
actually of how what leftists are saying
about this so let's let me show you i'll
give you an example so you just go to
madison cawthorne
science matters well i'm kind of
speechless i'm not sure if mannequin
hawthorne is gonna like this media
attention so yeah go ahead and hold
water for like the literal republican
establishment that's bought out by
special interest groups i mean look you
can be against cawthorne but you're
literally just helping the republican
establishment
it's actually fucking crazy
eric swalwell
oh my god it's eric swalwell
they're trying i love how they're trying
to say like that this somehow demeans
his manhood
in some kind this people are so fucking
disgusting like he should somehow be
ashamed of this is the biggest nothing
burger i've ever seen in my fucking life
right
i don't care that madison cothor likes
to wear lingerie in his free time it
doesn't bother me doesn't affect me
okay charlotte first of all you have a
fucking ukraine flag
in your fucking name you are a nazi you
are an azov hitlerite nazi
so that completely disqualifies your
credibility completely so let's actually
address the content of your little tweet
here we know you're a fucking nazi you
have no credibility as far as anything
you're fucking saying is concerned but
let's just address what you're fucking
saying here right
so you're saying i don't care that
madison cawthorne likes to weigh
lingerie in his free time doesn't bother
me okay first of all this is an example
of a mental disability and there's
nothing wrong with that but we need to
have some kind of cross
able age
able um mentally abled cross
communication so i could inform you that
taking a goofy vacation picture in no
way
betrays the idea that you like to wait
wear lingerie in your free time
and that he's played he's being playful
with no you're really overlooking you're
really like
reaching and over reading into this shit
and honestly
like
it does remind me of a specific type of
mental disability i'm just saying like
you just can't even you can't even like
tell the difference and you're just
gonna reach and like make a fucking big
deal out of nothing
so
clear about today's gop mickey mouse is
a groomer and madison cawthron is a
conservative christian
yes you don't know what a fucking
conservative christian means you think a
conservative christian is a
fundamentalist to be clear a
conservative christian can be a 25 year
old male
that does 25 year old male things
it it's just
anywhere in the world you go
conservative does not mean
fundamentalist conservative is not
actually about
how you yourself live your life
as much as it is about what you to be
what you believe to be like the
underlying
why being so angry it makes good content
emo but you sound mentally ill
no refunds bitch thank you with f uh
thank you for the five fucking dollars
and
i'm fucking angry
at bullshit and if you don't like
like i said this guy what who freely
gave me his five fucking dollars
this is the guy i was talking about who
has that fucking default reddit stare
that's his default stare that's like the
default temperament he has
he has the reddit stare
that's it
no passion no human anything he's
there's nothing there there's just
completely empty soulless fucking
and five dollars for that fucking snarky
comment
give me out good give me 50 if and
give me 50 or you're permanently banned
forever
mods give him like
five minutes to give me fifty dollars to
uh
to pay for what he just said
you sound mentally ill
you're a fucking blank fluoride stare
npc
and you're calling me mentally ill
you have no passion you don't live for
anything in this world you watch anime
and you have gyno
why do you even wake up from bed
why do you even wake up from bed in the
morning i don't know you tell me i don't
know why the fuck you do that
anyway um
yeah this is an example of an npc
dumbass who just like uh
needs to go to boot camp
so
eric champ
doesn't understand that a conservative
christian doesn't mean you're a
fundamentalist
okay a fundamentalist believes that
every aspect of your life is going to be
dictated
according to like prescribed
norms and prescribed forms of behavior a
conservative has views about society in
a very general sense especially when it
relates to
the decisive political decisions that
are on the table like okay what we have
decisions we have to make politically
what decisions should we make right
should we go far should we promote
like this
fundamental change of gender relations
or sex relations or whatever relations
or
should we kind of hold and that's where
it's decisive to be a conservative or
not as far as like how you live your
life personally
um
unless you're like fundamentally
deviating from the norm
you know you can't really say you can't
be a conservative if you're partying at
25 years old
and having some fun now if if
i would understand if he was like you
know involved in some like
same-sex shit because at that point oh
you're a conservative christian and
clearly that contradicts like in a very
direct way you know so i get that but
uh i mean i would understand that more
right if he was like involved in like
some you know same-sex activity or some
shit like that like okay i don't
understand right
um
but this is literally a nothing broker
this is like the it's actually fucking
mind-boggling that anyone's making a big
deal out of it let's continue looking at
these
dead npc comments from like the biggest
dumbass dumb fuck
npc blue check mark
oh dear
fifteen thousand like fifteen thousand
people are coping that this is somehow
embarrassing
fifteen thousand people are somehow
coping that it's embarrassing
madison cothran can take goofy vacation
photos it's not the photos it's the
hypocrisy you know what i noticed
the cr
the biggest irony i noticed about
leftists is that
they're fundamentalists
they can't
comprehend
just
just being a normal person
or if someone else is a conservative
everything has to be the most extreme
conclusion
thing possible
they are i don't want to insult puritans
but it's kind of like that kind of like
you know it does come from puritanism
right
fundamentalists in every
literal psychopaths
yeah it's like
why are they like that why are they
always just yeah they have this idea
that like
if you it's somehow hypocritical to do
that no it's fucking not
it's not hypocritical you're just a
fucking fundamentalist
you're just a fundamentalist that's not
hypocritical hypocrisy
would be if he was like you know telling
people oh
never even then it's not hypocrisy you
know i have such a different
um
understanding of like aesthetic and
morality than leftists like for example
let me actually tell you guys something
let's say can i give you guys an
intellectual kind of lecture right let's
say i told you for just for one second
like let's say i told you guys
the worst sin you could ever do is um
eat chocolate
candy bars do not eat chocolate candy
bars it is a sin
and then
don't do it it's bad and then i actually
was eating chocolate candy bars is how's
a hypocrite no
and i know for most of you
that's gonna be like fucking like un
unthinkable you're gonna be like what
of course that's the definition of
hypocrisy
actually it's not
it's not because in one case you are
talking about what you think is a good
message socially
to communicate to others for our common
sociality right and on the other hand
you're doing something personally which
may reflect some kind of imperfection on
your part or inability to live up to
what you think
would ultimately be good for people that
doesn't make you a hypocrite okay
yeah you have to actually kind of be
like a little bit smart to understand
this there's going to be a lot of dumb
fucks who don't understand that right
being flawed
on a personal level does not
somehow invalidate the messages you give
socially they don't now what's the
difference between that and the orgies
and shit
libs are calling him a hypocrite
hypocrisy implies he secretly transfer a
cross-dresser this was a goofy drinking
game at vacation party exactly so
there's only there's going to be two
levels to hypocrisy right one level of
hypocrisy is at the personal level that
doesn't have anything to do with what
you tell others to do
what it actually has to do with is what
you tell yourself you are and whether
you live up to what you tell yourself
you are now in that case you would be a
hypocrite if i look in the mirror and
tell myself
that i am someone who does not eat um
chocolate candy bars and i actually do
them then yeah there is a level of
hypocrisy to that
but
thank you roy abele for the five by the
way but actually
most hypocrisy is social right
so
hypocrisy is something that manifests
itself at the social level not in not at
the level of your personal lifestyle
choices or your personal decisions and
that's what makes the
orgies and cocaine parties
a form of hypocrisy it's not because
they are in their individual capacity
engaging in personal decisions that
contradict their public message is that
they're doing it together in this kind
of almost institutionalized
ritualized way where it's just this
dirty ritualized secret that in public
we preach one thing but yet we have this
like
we have this like um ritual this social
ritual that we do behind closed doors
that reflects that this is not something
we think
is for the society the corruption
manifests itself in some kind of
externalized social way
that's what makes it hypocritical
hypocrisy doesn't come
from when you're just like fucking doing
shit just personally hypocrisy enters
the frame
when you have this kind of scandalous
and symptomal
tick
sanctioned and manifested at some kind
of social level
right
it's just
hypocrisy is always about
implicit don't ask don't tell kind of
cultures where you're just like yeah we
know
that lindsey graham
is
secretly doing things we just don't talk
about it that's hypocrisy right
hypocrisy is when it becomes
a part of the norm
on a social level right
so who the fuck is in my show cue this
what
yo
what who the fuck are you
i was talking your discord chad yeah and
talking shit on communism
and please told you go on
against the sultan
okay raise your mark volume raise your
mic volume what's your problem
i want to know why do you believe in
such a you know big ideology
what do i believe in what
in this big ideology that is communism
big
big
big
big
like the animal
pig ideology yeah or where are you from
lithuania
you're from lithuania yeah and why are
you butt hurt about communism
it's in my fucking blood
no it's fucking not
there's shot communists
in the fucking woods i don't give a fuck
what your ancestor did bitch
it destroyed my country bro no it didn't
and many others
delayed
our progress but
there's
what about the communists in lithuania i
know them
oh all ten of them
no they don't matter
they exist
yeah and they're shunned from society
for being fucking retarded bro
no their son because lithuania is kind
of trying to bring back that neo-nazi
nostalgia now aren't they
nice nostalgia
oh you don't think germans fucked us too
we're tied with poland for being the
soviet red army are the ones who
liberated lithuania from the fucking
germans and the poles
and they shipped off 300 000 political
prisoners on off to siberia for what
yeah i keep keep talking about these
fairy tales listen fairy tales yeah
every fucking lithuanian no no why don't
you make it 300 billion who gives a fuck
at this point right but anyway
yeah the red army are the ones who
liberated hold on who liberated
lithuanian cities from polish control
from polish control yeah
the soviet union before they occupied us
okay so you wouldn't have had those
cities if it wasn't for the soviets now
would you have yeah
we had them for like one month
for a year at most i don't know exactly
and they were given back to poland all
of them
no
after
what do you mean they were getting so
what what what what is what how in what
way did the soviet union hurt lithuania
well after killing like around 300 000
of us like let's just say 300 trillion
right
no yeah yeah like how about 500.
a billion big number all right a billion
people
okay so tell me this why after the
soviets first
conquered us
illegally annexed us why did so many
lithuanians fire on the german side out
of sheer anger
against the soviet unions it was a class
war because the lithuanian bourgeoisie
and the classes that had everything to
lose from the soviet
yeah they left before that
ah they they took up arms and they
fought
not the
it wasn't the intellectuals who were
fighting the soviets it was young people
19 year olds you're not fucking
philosophers or
an intellectual from cities
from cities yeah
they're urbanized
yeah lithuania wasn't very urbanized
then the institutionalized
the institutionalized
the
you gotta understand back then tell me
why why be angry at lithuania why be
angry at the soviet union
well because they started shipping us
away
siberia so did you get shipped away to
siberia they removed the freedom of
speech yes we didn't have a lot of it
but we had a lot more
than with the soviets
and we had more freedoms
they didn't take our land
so what was the problem
what i just told you
you're saying there's a story three
hundred thousand got shipped
three hundred thousand
over the period of around five or ten
years i'm not sure yeah okay lithuania
right now has a population of 2.7
million people yeah back then it had a
similar one like 2.2 million
you're saying 300 000 out of 2.2 million
got shipped off to siberia yeah
even more even more died during the
world war ii
a lot of jews you think we like the
germans
we don't
jews were like i don't know uh
a seventh of the fucking population like
three hundred thousand it was yeah i
don't know what like any of this shit
has to do with anything like what okay
you he okay
the only thing you've given me so far is
that the soviets allegedly shipped 300
000 people out of lithuania i just find
that hard to believe
freedom of speech
okay
hold on who okay you know what you know
what let's talk about freedom of speech
goddess what's an example of a country
with freedom of speech does lithuania
have freedom of speech
no you can't see comments exactly so you
don't you don't clearly don't give a
fuck about freedom of speech does
america have freedom of speech i'm
against it i i think they should speak
their minds
okay america
so what was the difference then with the
soviet
that you union say anything
that's same in lithuania now
no yeah you just can't say different
things now but it's like the same
you go to jail if you support russia now
i agree there is a bad they can't say
communist and fascists so why are you
okay let's say you're a guy who just
wants freedom of speech right why are
you shitting on the soviet union then
because lithuania also doesn't have
freedom of speech now so it's clearly
not a soviet problem it's
maybe a deeper problem but don't blame
and just shit on the soviet union
yeah
they were banning
most of the fucking books that were
published the writers most of them got
killed
or ran away to america okay i i i just
have a hard time believing that if you
weren't
writing good stuff about the soviet
union i'm not saying that they were
writing bad stuff they were just not
writing
not that sounds like a tall tale to me
sorry i just i have a hard time given
what i know about the soviet union and
the diversity of literature that was
tolerated within the soviet union
including literature that even in the
stalin era there was literature that was
critical and satirical
of the soviet union and it wasn't banned
and this was in the 1930s so i highly
doubt that in lithuania throughout the
entire duration of the soviet union you
couldn't have any writings that weren't
not only were critical of the soviet
union but didn't directly praise this i
just find that hard to believe it just
sounds like a crazy tall tale
well
i'd have a really hard time seeing
finding any book that was being
published
publicly
and printed
by lithuanians critic criticizing the
soviet union in any way back then
there's no way that a single book like
that ever yeah it probably wasn't
allowed to be direct but i'm talking
about like backhanded satire and all
that that was very common in the soviet
era
yeah
it was
so it was
made in such a way so that the you know
shitty bureaucrats wouldn't find out
about it
what do you think look i i have look
let's
to be clear with you
hold on to be clear with you i'm not
saying the soviet era was perfect i have
critiques of the bureaucracy mao had
critiques of the bureaucracy stalin had
critiques of the bureaucracy i'm not
saying it's perfect what i have a
problem with is the way that you make it
seem like the soviet union you're
singling it out unfairly as the problem
when many of these issues
not only continue to persist after the
soviet union's gone but even got fucking
worse
i agree
so why single out the soviet union i
don't get it i think i don't think it
has anything to do with the soviet era i
think it has a lot to do with
nationalism and having a hostile
attitude toward russia today it doesn't
have anything to do with the soviet
union
we only have a far south attitude
against against russia right now
well there's been a hostile kind of a
nationalist to be honest i would love to
bring back the old days of the
lithuanian grand dutch you know
well if you're just more honest about
that you wouldn't have to hide behind
liberalism and you know some kind of
like humanitarian
decrying of the evil of the soviet union
you could just be a nationalist instead
of uh
i think the word nationalist has changed
a lot i mean like i love my country and
uh okay there's nothing wrong with that
lithuania is a proud country with a deep
history of statehood and it's not like
latvia and uh estonia which have no
history of of uh state at all it is it
is a real country with
you know it's it's a proud history and
tradition so there's nothing wrong with
that but i don't see why that has to be
bounded up with anti-russian hatred
well they were
the russians in both occupations the
russian empire and the communists
they both tried to
kill the
national spirit of lithuania i don't
think that's true lithuania was
no lithuanian
lithuania was allowed to be a a republic
in the soviet union
sure
so
the language was preserved
but it doesn't matter lithuanian i think
i i'm going to go ahead and bet that
lithuanian culture was better preserved
under the soviet union than it's being
preserved now where american liberal
globalization is melting away at all
differences i'm gonna make a bet and say
that
lithuania probably preserved its culture
better under the soviet union than it is
today
i don't like modern leftists i don't
like liberalism right now i hate the way
the modern world is looking right now
yeah but i'm
i'm just saying look at lithuania in the
interwar period where it was free
the fucking proudness of the people
the strength of the people how they
loved the country so much that 80 000 of
them
it's it's a small fucking country 80 000
fought for 10 years against the soviets
in the parties anymore
yeah i mean the the numbers the numbers
aren't fully known about how much it's
not i'm just giving on them wait what
what is this the interwar period or the
post-war period
yeah loving this
you're a very thank you for an inspiring
comrade thank you so much
it started in the war and
after the war it progressed a lot and
grew to around 80 000. yeah but this
sounds like the national the type of
national myth-making that a lot of
post-communist states invented
almost in part artificially to create
this independent sense of national
identity
just like ukraine did with bandera and
elsewhere i mean
you may you you may have been taught to
recall the partisan war and the post-war
period as like some glorious struggle of
the partisans but in the soviet era it
was remembered as just a handful of
bandits in the forest just kind of
leftovers fucking around it was making
so much
it was so annoying to the soviets that i
don't know who was the second in command
stalin some
kgb guy or something i don't know area
this guy yeah i think him
he
told stalin maybe we should just let
these baltics go they're making too much
trouble installing stalling well
that's
that's not because of lithuania's
resistance it's because barry uh
didn't want he barry wanted to give
germany back barrio didn't want to
expand the soviet union's
orders a great deal and he also didn't
want to expand the socials block
a great deal in general and he wanted
more approachment with the west and with
america in general
that was like a nice guy but i'm pretty
sure he was a fucking gun
who touched little kids
i those
have not ever been proven or
corroborated yeah i'm just saying i'm
pretty sure he looks like the type of
guy
well
speaking as someone who's not a fan of
baria a lot of shit was made up by the
khrushchev gang
who
overthrew barrier you know
they were they represented the soviet
bureaucracy barrio represented the um
nkvd which wasn't just the secret police
but was like uh
the internal affairs of the soviet union
in general
so there were all sorts of factions that
were fighting each other
and a lot of bullshit was made up by the
victorious faction
khrushchev's faction
i think we kind of straight from the
main point when we started talking about
lithuania
why do you
believe in communism
what
makes you believe that is actually a
good idea to distribute everything
equally and give all the power to some
retarded bureaucrats
that's not what communism is it's not
about distributing anything equally and
bureaucracy is a bad side effect
which the main communist leaders all saw
as a bad side effect and did everything
they could to curtail
leading up to mao who pretty much
smashed most of the soviet era chinese
bureaucracy i mean there's still
bureaucracy in china but they don't have
the power they used to
can you like give me a rough definition
of what you believe communism is but
because communism is when
a government
um
sorry it's not just one the government
it's not just political policy communism
is basically when a country's productive
forces are directed
in such a way
that maximalizes the well-being of the
majority of the people
so without the governments let's say how
would you do that
no you do it with the government but
it's not just
prevent bureaucrats from being corrupted
um
bureaucrats
gain power in a situation
where
communism doesn't really manifest itself
um
in a way that is economically reproduced
by the people which means people aren't
doing anything independently with their
own economic life
to actually reproduce the system they
the whole system is just top down
centralized from the top down based on a
command economy and that's really where
the bureaucracy comes from right but you
have a country like china where people's
everyday activities and everyday
economic activity actually
keeps the system together right
you don't you have less of a need for
that kind of bureaucracy right you can
have more kind of
more decentralized way where the system
can use and then also to be fair to more
utopian thinkers
capitalism you're saying
there's that well they call it markets
right there's that but then there's also
you know talk about super computers and
planning i don't know if you know the
guy paul cockshot
where you know um cybernetics could
allow for these both centralized and
decentralized mechanisms
of basic economic planning scientific
planning of the entire economy that
happens in a decentralized way through
feedback loops and inputs that come from
the consumer level
so there's all sorts of different ways
you can mitigate but the bureaucracy
problem basically comes from when you're
rapidly transitioning from an agrarian
country to a modern country through
um
socialistic and command economy planning
it's not just communism that had that
problem it's pretty much every
you know society had that problem that
japan had that problem communism it
never went away
up until the 90s
it was still a command economy
yeah in this in the soviet-led eastern
bloc uh they never got they never solved
that problem
but
the question is why
okay in china they kind of did yeah
but now they're like
you have no privacy
that's that's not true actually china is
actually spearheading privacy laws
that tech companies and tech platforms
have to abide by where you have to
consent
for any of your data to be taken and and
consumers have far more rights as far as
data protections are concerned
compared to the west if if you're
concerned about government surveillance
and i don't know the extent of it in
china i would be surprised if it was
that
invasive
well i'll tell you what a lot if there's
a lot it's like if there's a lot that's
just because people know about all of it
in america i can guarantee you there's
an equal amount if not
or i don't know if you know about it
fall apart soon what's
that do you believe that china will
fall apart soon
no
no
no
don't you think uh
the one child policy is gonna eventually
show its uh
repercussions
nah that's something that comes from
this youtube essayist i don't know
it's from the infographic show wherever
you got that from no
uh
the population graph
by age
of china
yeah i i i heard that some people are
saying there's a demographic crisis on
the horizon people have been foretelling
the collapse of china for decades and
decades i don't really see why this
would lead to the collapse of china
just don't see why
because
when
the biggest chunk of your population are
how do you say seniors they have to get
pensions and there's not a lot of young
people productive people who work
yeah but that's also mitigated by
automation right in the fact i mean the
reason why you're able to have that
demographic um composition in the first
place
is because of changes in technology and
the way society's production is being
organized right there's not a need for
the same amount of labor as before in
order to reproduce society
true
and also a lot of the things that people
get paid for are not necessarily based
in physical labor that seniors can't
perform so i mean just a lot of things i
mean
the
how we don't even really know how the
bulk of economic value is being produced
in the 21st century and i really have a
hard time believing the majority of that
is through physical labor
look i kind of thought you were like a
real hard line communist yeah
but yeah don't seem like that much of a
communist in reality
you seem like you're not that against
capitalism like most of them are
uh i don't know what it means to be
against capitalism but i definitely
don't think china would have been able
to get to the point that it is now if it
didn't have a command economy in the
beginning because when you're coming
from an agrarian society
have to centralize the forces of
production
and um the means of production most
in order to like um
direct them in such a way so as to like
consciously
um promote industrialization and all
that doesn't just happen
spontaneously you know
in a in a agricultural society so you're
either going to remain backward forever
like a third world country or you go
down the hard path the communist states
took and what you do with that i mean it
varies look at the netherlands
yeah but all of those they were making a
lot of they were
very agrarian for most
their industrialization was slow
you know it was over time they were
getting a lot of benefit from the
agrarian side
yeah but you're talking about the
history of europe so europe had the 30
years war they had all this crazy
history of violence and peasant all you
know protestant reformation before then
europe and then the black death was a
big factor but europe had like this
huge
problem they went through then they
accidentally
stumbled into capitalism
because of its own specific history
other countries don't have that same
history right europe went through a very
chaotic process to arrive at something
like industrial capitalism actually only
the only britain actually arrived at
being an industrial capitalist society
and it's through the banks that were
created by british industrial capitalism
that other countries were able to be
industrialized in the first place
through the loans that they were um
giving out right even germany right
uh
so in an independent path to
industrialization that wasn't reliant on
existing concentrations
of capital
uh
is only possible through communism
there's never been an example in history
of a country pursuing that path
unless they submit to the world economic
system that was created by the british
empire
i think it was the banks who were
leading in this realization i think it
was more so the culture of the english
well no the english the english
arrived at the industrial revolution for
their own reasons well the british
empire was a huge factor in that sea
but yeah they had their own reasons but
then the wealth that they created
through that industrial revolution and
through the british empire i should add
was channeled through those banks
which was then used to give loans to
other countries that they could use to
industrialize so create a lot of wealth
and use some of that wealth to help
other countries
as a as an investment that's what we're
talking about
and uh
by the way
i kind of get why you would like putin
yeah i don't believe that you should uh
you know get banned and twitch and stuff
for believing
in the russian cause or whatever
but
uh why do you see them in the good light
exactly
what i see in in
in the case of russia is i see a people
the majority of whom
are were left behind after the collapse
of the soviet union
their their lifeline is coming from
pensions or government aid or some some
some vestigial
kind of fossil of the past
no one gives a shit about they're not
considered economically useful they're
not considered economically viable and
they're pretty much completely left
behind
and i see in the case of eastern ukraine
a case where russia's
undergoing this internal revolution
where they're trying to make a state for
the people they're they don't care if
these people aren't economically viable
they're gonna wager on forging a state
that represents and defends their
interests
um
investing in them instead of investing
you know most of today's economy is
based in algorithms and wise investments
they say and why is investments that are
based on precedent i see what russia's
doing is that it's investing in its own
people despite the short-term economic
losses that are going to come with that
uh
which there's no data precedent for i
mean if you took blackrock's a.i
and you asked it you know is what
putin's doing wise it would say no right
so i find it very heroic and admirable
that putin
and russia is doing what it's doing
regardless of what the world thinks and
regardless of what the economists think
and regardless of what the technocrats
think according to
globalist neoliberalism
saying putin putin is for the russian
people yeah
as far as
insofar as he's doing what he's doing in
ukraine yes
you said uh you mentioned that uh
the russian people were kind of left
behind after the fall of the soviet
union yeah that they were poor and
didn't have much
yeah
well you know that
that was caused by the oligarchs
because they bought up all the
businesses
you know they were usually
dog the first oligarchs
were criminals in the soviet union
yeah
they were the only ones who had money
when it fell
yeah so they used that money and they
bought up all the businesses
and they got these massive monopolies on
everything
and then
as you said the russian people were left
behind and then putin came in
yes
he did
eliminate some of those oligarchs who
didn't support him
but most of them
or he just made new ones
he's still supported they're still there
of course some of them are getting
killed right now because they don't
support the war
and that's that's what i consider it to
be like this internal revolution is that
i think
putin was fueling this
the poorness of his people you know
he's not exactly i don't i don't think
it was necessarily i think it was it's
not so much putin's actions it's his
lack of action
putin wasn't doing enough for the
russian people and i agree with that
um
and he was not being hard enough on the
oligarchs and
the financial capitalists
in russia and i agree with that but
not being hard enough he was recruiting
them that he was
you know trying to get but you you could
say recruit them another person could
say he was being conciliatory and
compromising with right and it means the
same thing to me he was not
doing enough i agree with that right but
it's about which and where is the
pendulum swinging right and to me the
pendulum is swinging more in the
direction of the russian people
at it at the expense of these oligarchs
which have been a stranglehold on the
russian economy for so long i think this
is going to be at the expense of putin
too because of all the things he didn't
do i think it's going to be at the
expense of putin himself as well it it
may
yeah
it it depends it may right um
it it depends on how far he's willing to
go and whether so for example if putin
compromises and kind of you know
he falls short of the russian people's
aspirations and demands they may turn
against him right who knows but so far
that's not what he represents right now
they're all rallying behind him because
it represents this kind of defense of
russia and russian sovereignty against
the whole western world
it's true that a lot of peop a lot of
russians are rallying with him but
it's also true that
many in a lot of russians are rallying
against him of course they can't say it
right now
not i don't think those russians are a
significant portion of the population i
think
among the westernized segments of the
population there's probably you know a
lot of resentment about the fact that
anti-communism thank you i appreciate
you there's probably a lot of resentment
about the fact that they're not able to
like interact
with the west in the same capacity as
before or have those same connections
and but that you have to understand
that's the ruling class that's kind of
like the upper elite i think for the
majority of the russian people
they're rallying behind
as this war drags on and it's probably
and it probably will you know the
ukrainians are holding them back
relatively well
you know they have a small smaller army
and all so they're doing pretty good
right now as this war drags on more and
more people in russia will feel
the
economic effects of this war and of the
sanctions
and they're gonna you know who are they
gonna blame the ukrainians or the or
putin
i i don't i think when it comes to i
think you're kind of being a little too
materialist right
i think when it comes to a people
choosing sovereignty versus economic
comfort i think sovereignty and pride
will always come from
but people
i don't think people will say like oh
yeah we're just gonna like
give up russia's
deeper aspirations because of the
hardship we're facing right now i think
you know people
put their dignity before anything else
i mean they've been facing hardship with
putin
since crimea
has been going bad
of course it was slowly climbing back up
but it was still
way down since before crimea
so it's been a long time no the opposite
effect has happened crimea and the
recent operation have helped putin i
think they've actually
single-handedly have been responsible
for the
longevity of putin's political career i
think without crimea
and without the recent operation putin
you know putin was being challenged by
his opposition the communists
pretty significantly and severely until
he initiated the special operation
in which case the approval of putin shot
way back up and
communists kind of lost out well
communists are irrelevant
no they're they're the sec they're the
largest opposition party yeah because
every other one who's actually a threat
and gets
eventually poisoned like uh
i forget his name you know the
it was a big story not long ago that
putin poisoned
one of his political
opposition
i don't remember the name
um
yeah there's been a lot of stories about
people getting poisoned and those the
details surrounding those stories are a
bit shady
oh no he didn't get poisoned he
got arrested in an airport i believe oh
you mean navalny
yeah navalny
yeah navalny was never popular
he was never he was polling at like one
percent in russia he was never relevant
or popular he had no potential to ever
represent anything i mean maybe he
represented a hashtag that's only
you're just trusting that no i mean no
western source is actually real
i'm not saying that but i'm just saying
nobody in russia wanted navalny to be
their leader almost no one
but he was still a symbol of the
resistance to putin he was still high
a lot of people behind them i i am not
sure if he's gonna be the president it
matters
the idea i think navalny represented the
western path right and there's a lot of
people in russia who represent the
western path
and
some russians showed some sympathy
toward this before the recent operation
now it's completely gone right
i mean
there they because there was this
illusion people had
that russia could somehow co-exist
within a western
like european-led order and russia could
just be a part of that and they could
have its
it couldn't it could be respected within
that and it's clear that's not possible
the soviet union has to join nato i
believe
because it's an
anti-soviet russian alliance
you can't have two superpowers in one
yeah exactly
so yeah i mean
that's pretty much the point
yeah
well i mean it's 5 am in lithuania so
i'm probably gonna go
better right now
all right now i don't really know what
we can talk about more no
like i said i respect you you're cool i
just don't really believe in the
communist idea you know
yeah that's fine
there's still a lot that has to be
elaborated about communism and
just pointing to china i know it's
really not that convincing right now so
that's pretty fair
in terms of covet
i may have a radical idea of making
china pay for covet because okay
it's a little radical well i i don't
know if i could talk about this on
youtube but i think um you should
definitely do some more
research about the origins of uh a
recent event and i'm not sure china is
actually the culprit but um yeah with
that being said
yeah good talk
yeah see ya man
all right so
with that
right
with that
um
[Music]
we actually have a lot to cover
so i was going to cover some stuff about
the republican civil war going on right
now there is a republican civil war and
this is kind of what i wanted to talk
about a little bit which is how there's
this populist uprising
in the gop i mean just very briefly i'll
cover it you know um you have jd vance
in ohio
who
is a populist who was you know
he's being challenged by these
establishment you know he a wealthy
businessman and these kinds of fucking
former state treasury these swamp
creatures who are challenging him in
ohio right and
they're using some criticisms advance
made of trump
the difference is that when vance
critiqued trump he was doing so as an
independent person not someone signaling
to the establishment or submitting to
the establishment right so there's and
the hawthorne news is really just a part
of this bigger context of this civil war
that's going on right now within the gop
right which we should pay a lot of
attention to we shouldn't just assume
it's all the same so vance by the way is
being supported by
peter thiel right
is peter thiel's doing some shit behind
the scenes against these people
and
let me see what this institute
people tell me about this institute
yeah i don't know what
the fuck they're talking about but yeah
theo comes from a specific background
and
it's just yeah
he he supports all these
anti-establishment people behind the
scenes
specifically from the right wing side of
the aisle
and um
yeah the the primaries are approaching
and i think i i don't i really haven't
been covering these enough and i think
that's what i want to start doing
starting tomorrow is i'm going to shift
a little bit from the geopolitical stuff
assuming that there's not
a bunch of breaking news about it and
i'm going to actually start talking more
about these upcoming republican
primaries right because we are seeing
the swamp creatures of the republican
party going after jd vance going after
madison cawthorne going after a bunch of
other people i imagine we're going to
cover all of it i want to do an in-depth
analysis of this stuff because it's
fucking important you understand
now anyway the main nuke of today is
actually not going to be about domestic
politics it's going to be about the
situation going on in surprise ukraine
okay
so the first item of importance i want
to talk about
which i don't see a lot of people
talking about is how
before any of this shit happened in case
so a lot of people are just trying to
paint this picture that russia is
somehow
you know just this blanket aggressor
that wants to take ukraine and all of
its actions have reflected the intention
on part of russia of breaking up ukraine
and reclaiming novorossiya and you know
that they were the sinister russians
were scheming and plotting to take
ukraine from the very beginning well i i
have some evidence to present that goes
in the opposite direction of that and
you know the results may actually shock
you right so
dmitry peskov in december 26th of 2021
and this is just as far back as i
decided to go today with minimal
research said this
the conflict in donbass should not be
resolved by military means otherwise
there'll be a question of ukrainian
statehood
so the russians are clearly saying
listen we don't want to have it to get
to this point where we have to call into
question the existing territories and
borders of ukraine as a state
but if we don't solve this problem in
the donbass right
this is going to be called into question
this was in december before russia had
ever laid a foot
on ukrainian soil at least in the form
of its official
special operation
so it's just crazy how brazen
and reckless ukraine's leadership has
been acting despite countless warnings
that have been coming from the russian
side
um to stop what you're doing or there's
going to be a question of ukrainian
statehood and what did zelinski do what
did the ukrainian government do no
no
they kept acting like they had fucking
leverage of some kind when they didn't
it was extremely irresponsible and
misleading as far as the ukrainian
people were concerned right because if
you're gonna act this way it sounds like
you have some guns to back it up but
the truth of the matter is that
throughout the entire duration of this
conflict with russia
ukraine has been acting like a whiny
little bitch
i'm gonna show you
the exact person who epitomizes in my
view this whiny little bitch stance of
ukraine this
whining bitch made baby ass little bitch
shit right
and it's this guy
so i don't know if you know who this guy
is
and he's at the u.n he represents
train at the security council i mean
let's just see you'll have it here here
he is here he is this is the fucking guy
clemens this guy this guy right here
right here i don't know if you ever he
heard this guy talking before refugees
but
let's hear him talk antonio
and finally to flee
from when russia has been doing is
really disrespectful and russia better
stop doing right now
and russia and he just like sounds like
a whiny little baby bitch and i just i i
know it's a little immature i don't give
a fuck i really wanted to talk about
this i really wanted to talk about how
fucking annoying this guy is
and how much his voice epitomizes the
vanity of the stance of the ukrainian
leadership they have been given multiple
opportunities to stop fooling around and
stop fucking around and get serious
about getting to the negotiation table
with the people in the dawn bass or
they're going to risk the very future of
ukraine
and if you don't know this we are now
looking at a scenario in which the
novorossiya whole of novorossiya so
that's the whole of the donbass the
whole of the donetsk the whole of the
luhansk and southern ukraine
uh mariupol
us quite possibly odessa so that there's
going to be a border with transnistria
all of that is going to be taken and
annexed by russia and ukraine won't have
a claim to it any longer
that is that is the concrete and
material result of the actions of the
ukrainian leadership you don't fucking
believe me
all you have to do is look at the fact
that the russian side has been
persistently warning the ukrainians that
this was going to be the inevitable
outcome now if this was russia's
intention all along just to annex and
swallow up these parts of ukraine you'd
think they would have kind of kept that
intention under wraps
rather than directly tell the ukrainians
that that's not something we want to
have to
it's not a level of escalation we want
to have to get to we'd much rather
prefer you get to the negotiation table
and settle things out and hash things
out with the people in the donbass but
no the ukrainians decided not to listen
they decided that
instead they were going to be whiny
little bitches who keep pleading to
europe and the west as if europe gives a
fuck and as if europe's going to do
anything except use ukraine use and
abuse ukraine right and they didn't want
to cooperate and do that and where did
this come from at this point you kind of
have to get to a psychological type of
analysis because where this really comes
from
is this type of exuberance this type of
arrogance this type of
stuck-up mentality that comes up with
thinking you're somehow more civilized
and more western and more favored in the
eyes of the anglo-saxon masters of the
world than the russians it literally
comes from a place of pure hubris that
the western ukrainians decided that they
were not going to sit at the table with
the russians they were not going to
implement the minsk agreements that they
themselves agreed to they were going to
continue to keep up the public front
they were going to join nato and they
were going to not even seed a single
inch or centimeter despite not having
any fucking leverage whatsoever to back
that stance up at all this idea of
having this like unconditional posturing
stance where you're just gonna say no
i'm not gonna work what leverage do you
fucking have we're gonna fight to the
very last man i mean that sounds poetic
that sounds like some western ancient
greece greek strategy of the 300
spartans were out of their values they
decided to sacrifice themselves to the
very last man because they didn't want
to compromise
but when you translate that into the
actual modern world in reality and up
the scale from like a few people the
snake island 13 which by the way was a
made-up story if you didn't know that to
an entire fucking country of like tens
of millions of people it's an extremely
childish and irresponsible
form of posturing right which leads to
the deaths of thousands of people leads
to the displacement of millions and
leads to a geopolitical catastrophe so
in the real world you don't get to act
like a hero of some greek tragedy where
you go no despite not having any
leverage whatsoever we're not going to
compromise or cede an inch to russia
we're not going to compromise anything
we're yeah that's something you can only
do if you have leverage ukraine didn't
have any fucking leverage they ca and
even more despicable and pathetic about
the fact that ukraine didn't have any
fucking leverage is the fact that they
pretended like they did they didn't even
go down the path of just saying our
principles are enough we'll sacrifice
ourselves to the last man
it's also the fact that they hid behind
nato in the west acting like nato was
gonna come to their rescue and back them
up in the event of this fucking commerce
confrontation which embarrassingly
didn't turn out to be the fucking case
and now we can see the concrete and
material results of ukraine's posturing
and its actions and what do you know
it's led to a complete disaster where
millions of people's lives have been
displaced a ton of infrastructure within
ukraine has been destroyed um
thousands and thousands of people have
been killed and tens of thousands i
imagine have been injured i mean
and all for what when you maintain this
heroic greek posture
you're not taking into account the fact
that this isn't just your call your
decision is affecting women and children
it's affecting civilians who don't agree
with you it's affecting people who would
rather actually be with russia it's
affecting people who don't think it's
worth it there's nothing heroic about
that whatsoever it's a high form of
cowardice especially considering the
fact
that this fucker right here people like
this fucker are not doing any of the
fighting themselves he's gonna be cozy
sitting behind his fucking desk at the
u.n while he postures in this fucking
way with this fake and false bravado
using the ukrainian people as
sacrificial lambs with which to hide
behind
when you poke the russian bear and incur
a response that's actually exactly what
the azov terrorists are doing in
mariopol and azov stall where they're
holding
allegedly thousands of civilians hostage
in tunnels which they're not allowing to
evacuate or be freed from now that's
going to be an item on our agenda a
little later
in the coverage but i want you to keep
that in mind and keep that in your head
because we're going to get to that and
actually cover that
a lot more depth
later on in the stream
now if you didn't think that was enough
after weeks after the special military
operation i mean after russian soldiers
were you know
close to kiev and pretty much
way farther into ukraine than just the
dawn bass where they had every
opportunity
to do whatever they fuck they wanted
they even issued another warning
so on march 5th
which was last month putin directly said
that if the ukrainian leadership
continues to do what they are doing
it will call into question the future of
their statehood and this will be
entirely their responsibility
so again they were warned again even
after russia had initiated its
intervention how did the ukrainian side
act they projected the same level of
western hubris that got them to the
point of the russian special military
operation in the first place we don't
care what you're saying russia it's all
a bluff i mean what this is really the
basic pathology of the western arrogance
and hubris when your adversary wants to
sit at the table and negotiate something
with you you take it for weakness or you
just you completely
annihilate the other and just say we
don't negotiate with terrorists
we don't negotiate with putin we don't
negotiate you have to in the world you
have to be a fucking grown-up and
negotiate people who define the region
that you're governing over you do have
to negotiate with the people you fucking
share a region with if you want to put
what's in the best interests of your own
people
in the front now this again ukraine's
posturing
may be heroic to some fucking twitter
dumb fucks living in america who don't
know anything about the history the
culture the tradition
anything relating to the region
whatsoever
but again the concrete implication to
that is what the concrete implication
is
a devastating loss
of livelihood for the ukrainian people
you know it's just
it's so pathetic it's so disgusting
how
the lives of ukrainians on the ground
ukrainian civilians was gambled with by
the ukrainian government they i mean
march 5th again we are now at a point
and i'm telling you guys this because
this is really the story of today
yes ukraine as we know it is gone i told
you about that yesterday thank you
tristan jones
so much um nova garcia is going to be
returned back to russia
and you know odessa will probably be
taken and it's just like a line there's
no going back from right i doubt this is
ever this is
this is a rubicon that you can't go back
from it's been crossed already right
now the real question is though how did
we get to this point because recently
right i mean ukraine
has accused russia of imperialism right
what did ukraine say about
russia's plans on taking southern
ukraine so this is what the ukrainian
leadership said kiev accuses moscow of
imperialism after russian flags
interest in southern ukraine
right
and they say
this is this is a form i mean this is
the problem with the western hubris that
i'm talking about so they're they're
they they they keep coming up with new
forms of bitching but they don't get to
the fundamental meat and potatoes of how
you got here in the first place so first
when russia initiated the special
military operation what did ukraine say
can you guys hear me like really listen
closely and pay attention to what i'm
saying here hear me out okay
hear me out
when this first started okay
ukraine said that russia is hitler and
it's the worst thing in the world and
we're not going to negotiate with them
and now a month later when russia
decides to express interest in southern
ukraine after they had already given
ukrainians the chance to negotiate about
this ukraine is fuming with indignation
about the imperialism of russia
now if you didn't catch that let me
break it down to you why that is so
fucking
irrational right
the reason that's so fucking irrational
lies in the fact
hold on give me a fucking second
mods get rid of these fucking dumb fucks
in my chat
i don't know what the fuck you're doing
get rid of these stupid fucking pedo
bitch
dumb fuck scum in my chat
alright
now the reason that's so fucking
irrational
lies in the fact
that you already decided that russia was
the worst thing in the world
should be annihilated isn't worthy of
negotiating with isn't worthy of having
any dialogue with you already decided
that the other russia was literally
satan so
why are you acting surprised when russia
does things that you consider oh no
russia just massacred a bunch of people
oh no russia just did this russia did
just did that hold on how was that
breaking news you had already decided
preemptively that russia was the worst
fucking thing in the world and now what
i mean you've ran
your words don't have any meaning
anymore you're choosing russia of
imperialism well you already called
putin hitler you already called them
fucking nazis you already called them
the worst thing in the world how is how
did how was the bar get any fucking
worse when you've already painted them
with this broad brush of dehumanization
and refusal to negotiate refusal to sit
and talk or concede or compromise even
an inch you're going to be this greek
hero who just you know we're going to
sacrifice ourselves to the last man and
zelinski said or some dumb shit that
they've been fucking saying so now when
russia says okay
we're looking at the situation in
southern ukraine where most people do
want to join russia and you know what
we're going to have southern ukraine now
you're decrying and accusing russia of
imperialism but the russians warned you
about this on march 5th okay and that's
to say nothing about even earlier than
march 5th
but
march 5th
russia warned you about this russia told
you that if you continue down the path
you're currently on
then the ramifications are going to be
that ukrainian statehood is going to be
called for question and how did you
respond to what putin said
we don't care what you say poo and
you're literally hitler then when he
fucking does it all of a sudden you care
now
so you care now but you didn't care back
in march 5th
right because you were operating under
the arrogant
assumption that nato's gonna come to
your rescue and you don't have to
negotiate with russia because you're
gonna you're gonna destroy and kick
russia's ass i mean this is a common
theme in common pattern we even saw in
mariupol in maryupol right what did we
see we said we're not going to surrender
we're not going to negotiate we're going
to abandon
the nazis the nazis of mary opal acted
like greek heroes now that they're being
cornered in as of stall with no escape
what's going on now the ukrainian
government is appealing to the
humanitarians
at putin please open a corridor and
they're using human shields oh the
civilians
listen what what you why didn't you keep
that same energy you had before
why didn't you just keep that same
fucking energy you had before
when you decided
that the russians
you know what i mean you already decided
these people were satan and they were
the fucking devil and they're they're
not worthy of any negotiation they're
not worthy of any dialogue they're not
worthy of any cooperation
and now what
now you're gonna cry and act like you're
surprised surprised pikachu face
this is the western hubris that i'm
talking about western hubris is when you
paint your enemy
in a completely dehumanized way where
they're orcs and you're not gonna
negotiate whatever and then you have a
surprised pikachu face when they decide
to do things that violate the
conventions of an otherwise negotiated
agreement
and it's such a common fucking thing
and it's like you philosophers could
write books about this
mentality and it really is this kind of
like ideological
psychological form of stupidity that
western ukrainians have duped themselves
into adopting because they want to be
civilized europeans even though the
europeans will never accept them because
they consider them backward slavs just
like russians are and they're being used
that doesn't seem to matter though right
yeah and it's
like speaking of as of stall which is
what we're talking about here
right
so we covered this yesterday about how
putin orders troops to seal marijuana's
last defenders and thousands of
civilians oh my god putin's just this
evil horrible man who's closing people
into tombs what a ruthless horrible guy
oh putin's so evil what a what an
asshole what a horrible person right i
mean that's what you think if you listen
to the media and if you listen to
the daily mail
but
as far as what russia has actually been
saying we haven't seen a fucking
response so
the russian ministry of defense issued
this statement today where they said
the situation in mary opal has
normalized
residents of the city have been able to
move freely through the streets without
hiding from ukrainian nazi shelling
humanitarian aid is being delivered food
water and basic necessities the
authorities of the dunetsk people's
republic are organizing the clearing of
the streets from rubble and the removal
of damaged ukrainian military equipment
all the remnants of the ukrainian as of
nazis together with foreign mercenaries
from the usa and european countries are
securely blocked on the territory of the
azov stall plant
our demands to release women and
children
allegedly staying with them for free
departure in any direction are ignored
by the nazis so russia is not only
saying yeah we will allow them to leave
they are demanding that women and
children be released
and they're being completely ignored
that's not being reported in the western
press
no what's being reported in the western
press is this false bravado and false
heroism of azov stall is still ukraine
did you any of you guys see that fucking
picture that they posted on twitter let
me show it to you it's so fucking
pathetic let me show you that picture
that they posted to twitter to try and
posture and say that oh as of stall is
still ukraine so heroic
so heroic
oh look at the heroism
ukrainian fighters hold out an azov
stall such heroes hiding behind me women
and children that they refuse to allow
let go to safety they say
we are such heroes and
we're gonna fight to the very last women
and child
what heroes what fucking heroes if
you're such fucking heroes release the
women and children and then you can
fight to the last man
how was this fucking heroic
i'm gonna make a tweet about this
i'm actually baffled
i'm actually baffled that
as of terrorists as of nazis are being
called
pulled up in azov stall are being called
heroes
if they're such heroes why don't they
release the women and children
and fight to the last man after
what's heroic about using women and
children as hostages
literally what is so fucking heroic
about what they're doing
what is so fucking heroic about that
our demands to release women and
children
are being ignored the order and they're
giving an order they're demanding it
it's not just that they're allowing for
it it's something that they're demanding
of the exit of civilians if they are
indeed there from the territory of as of
still for further evacuation is reported
to the nazis on an hourly basis so every
fucking hour they're telling these
people release the women and children
release the women and children release
the women and children release the women
and children and they're falling on
completely deaf ears
and they dare accuse russia of not being
willing to open quarters no russia is
being is is more than willing to allow
for women and children to evacuate what
they're not willing to do is allow for
as of neo-nazi terrorists to flee
alongside them why would russia allow
these terrorists to flee when they're
just going to kill more russians
it's such despicable cowardly fucking
behavior that's just like it baffles the
fucking mind that anyone could conceive
of that as somehow fucking heroic right
um so it's on an hourly basis it's not
just you know uh they didn't just tell
them once on an hourly basis and this
information information is also being
communicated to the representatives of
the kiev regime through the deputy prime
minister so the ki of regime which is
constantly bitching about russia and
telling russia they have to open up a
corridor and also bitching to the west
and the foreign press right
they could easily communicate to those
as of nazis to stand down
or could they
because that operates under the
assumption that the ukrainian government
are the people in control
the truth is that they're not the truth
is that the wild thugs of azov these
neo-nazi thugs and criminals
are actually the ones in power the
ukrainian government has no power
whatsoever to strong-arm or reign those
people in they do whatever the fuck they
want and if the ukrainian government
tells them to stand down
the ukrainian government will be
overthrown
make no mistake of who's actually in
fucking power here as in almost every
case right political power comes out of
the barrel of the gun
who has the guns in ukraine right now
it's the azov nazis and hitler right
criminals those are the people with guns
therefore those are the people in power
not the ukrainian government
the retention by the as of nazis and
foreign mercenaries of civilian hostages
if there are any
proves that they are not defenders but
utter terrorists
in connection to this the u.s state
department speakers attempts to lie
about the nazi rabble's alleged
retention of control over mariopol are
fake and directly aiding and abetting
terrorists at the highest level of
government
the state department is habitually
misinforming its own citizens and
everyone else
ukraine itself its inhabitants in
mariupol and other cities are of
interest to washington only in the
profits from armed suppliers and the
fight against russia at least to the
last ukrainian as washington and all its
satellites repeat with the help of the
state department
so again if they were actually
interested in the humanitarian concern
of the people trapped in as of stall
right
then you would release the women and
children and as of they won't do that
because the ukrainian nazis hold up
there know that they're going to be
captured
if they release the women and children
because russia will simply storm his off
stall and won't have any more hesitation
so this is the position they're putting
russia in if russia storms is off stall
there's going to be a lot of human
tragedies
which they're going to use
pornographically as war material to
further demonize russia
this is the sick reptilian criminal
brains and mentality of the kiev junta
and the neo-nazi criminals running
ukraine
almost
in a lizard-like reptilian way
they are using human tragedies as
material for war
to bombard western audiences with
with absolutely no human regard for the
civilians trapped in azov stall
within their hearts they don't give a
fuck about the women and children
trapped in there they are banking on an
investment that they can either use
the deaths of some of those people as
pornography with which to further
demonize russia
or
they can use them as their one-way
ticket out of his off stall and to
safety
at which point they will continue to
shoot and kill
russian soldiers and terrorize russian
civilians and also
not face any accountability for the war
crimes and criminal actions they were
responsible for in mariupol and
elsewhere
now the cherry on top of this entire
thing is when you contrast
this type of posturing
with the bravado
with the arrogance
and with the stance these same as off
terrorists had in the past few weeks
before they found themselves in this
situation of being cornered and as off
stall we're gonna fight to the last man
we're gonna beat the russians back
oh we failing grab the women and
children we're gonna take them
underground
that's fucking heroic
maybe there's a different cultural
conception of heroism between russia and
the western world
but as far as i'm fucking concerned as
an american who was born here i don't
consider that heroic at all i consider
that
the utmost cowardice of fucking criminal
bandit wild animals who have no sense of
honor or dignity whatsoever you act like
a tough guy who's gonna fight to the
last man and you're gonna act like this
isis terrorist who's willing to yeah but
but then you're gonna take the women and
children as hostages what a fucking
brave man you are
what a brave soldier and a brave man you
really fucking are
right it's absolutely fucking pathetic
i mean we're witnessing
an unprecedented level
of criminality
and terrorism
i mean why don't we reverse the rules
reverse the rules here
let's say that russia
was the culprit
and you had russian soldiers who took
civilians
underground and won't let the civilians
i mean how would the western press
report on this if the roles were
reversed let's say these were donetsk
militiamen instead of as of nazis how do
you think ukraine in the west would be
reporting on this right
and the most disgusting thing of all
ladies and gentlemen
is that
you would be able to report on that on
twitch if it was donetsk militiamen
doing the exact same thing as the azov
nazis you could report on that on twitch
and say oh what horrible people but for
me to report on what the azov is doing
here that would be a bannable offense on
twitch.tv that's a bannable offense oh
it's okay if it's the donetsk militiamen
doing something bad but if you report on
what the azoff terrorists are doing
you're gonna get censored and
de-platformed twitch is gonna ban you
streamlabs is not gonna process
donations for you stream elements is
gonna ban you
the hammer is gonna come down on you
you're gonna get
completely de-platformed you don't even
deserve to feed yourself anymore how
dare you
how dare you
i wanna look one of these people in the
fucking eye and ask them hey
do you think it's honorable
to use women and children as human
shields
do you think that it's criminal
for for someone to use women and
children as shields
where
you're not going to actually let them
leave
because you just want to save your own
skin is that somehow honorable in your
eyes
happy easter us
thank you gabriel appreciate you so much
there's nothing fucking honorable about
that whatsoever
it's it's the
pinnacle of cowardice right
that's something that if if people just
knew about what was going on in azov
stall it would make
the azov terrorists look so bad but like
i said guys this is an information war
where nobody actually has any concern or
care about the truth
what they're actually concerned with is
doing the best they can
to make russia look bad
make ukraine look good
and it has nothing to do with truth and
they've admitted this they've admitted
that this is an infowar they've admitted
that ukraine won the infomore with the
stories about the ghost of kiev and the
snake island 13 all outright
fabrications just like they're now
fabricating the lie that russia is the
one who's endangering civilians and has
off stall and keeping them trapped there
rather than the fucking as off
terrorists who won't let these innocent
people go
they simply won't let these fucking
people go
holy fuck
thank you matteo can't wait for the next
rambo sequel good american guy fighting
alongside nazis against russians is
gonna effing sick
yeah appreciate you man yeah i wouldn't
surprise me i mean it's kind of funny
like they've never made any
i think i made a tv show where isis were
the good guys there was like this show
on fx called uh tyrant where like these
like isis fanatics were actually the
good guys something like that
it's kind of funny i don't know
but um
if more americans were informed about
this if the international community as
they like to call it was informed about
the situation as of stall i think that
would actually put pressure to release
those civilians i think an international
campaign should start where people talk
more about azov stall talk more about
the civilians trapped in his off stall
and petition the ukrainian government to
put pressure on their wild animal
neo-nazis
to release those people
and we're the bad guys mind you i have
to get the platform from twitch i have
to be the platform from all these
payment processing
systems right streamlabs has to ban me
stream elements has to ban me i have to
get totally de-platformed we're the bad
guys because we're the people who are
saying leave women and children out of
it if you want to fight russia go ahead
and fight russia fight them on your own
we can't convince you you're neo-nazi
fanatics whatever do it on your own
stop using women and children as
hostages though
and the cowardice is this it's that
russians are not barbarians russians
aren't going to go and kill women and
children locked in as off stall russia
doesn't want to go and harm civilians
and that's the only fucking thing that's
keeping russia from storming as of stall
it's the only fucking thing
the only reason russia is not now
storming as off stall
is because of this
thank you johnny so much
appreciate you man
that's the only fucking reason it's it's
it's insanity it's crazy it's actually
insane
it's the only fucking reason
the only fucking reason
that russia is not storming as hostile
is because they don't want to hurt
civilians and the azov terrorists
literally know that
nobody cares
absolutely nobody cares about this
nobody's talking about it nobody's
covering it i mean yeah there's a great
deal of people on our side of the aisle
that are covering it but as far as the
mainstream press is concerned as far as
the international community is concerned
nobody's talking about it nobody cares
about the lives that are actually
trapped under there in a soft stall all
they care about is doing what benefiting
the azov terrorists and benefiting the
azov nazis with more morale and more
pornographic overtures and sucking them
off about how fucking heroic they are i
mean did you guys see this pathetic shit
i have to show you won't even fucking
believe it i have to show it to you
it's that is one fight i can't believe i
can't find it right now
it might have deleted it out of shame
and embarrassment i hope that's the
fucking reason
let me see if i can find it
again if you want a picture of what azov
stall looks like
this is the whole complex and this is
the network of underground tunnels that
these civilians are being held hostage
in which russia is demanding the release
of because they're cornered from all
sides there's no escape of this without
you know
being received by russian troops or
being captured by russian troops so the
azov nazis have no nothing they can do
except hold these civilians as hostage
it's almost like a bank robbery where
they're holding the civilians hostage
nobody step any foot further or the
civilians get hit
it's exactly what's going on
that's exactly what's going on here
i i can't believe i can't find that
photo
they said azov stole here it is here it
is i think i found it this is it here it
is this is the photo i was talking about
i can't believe i couldn't find it
but yeah
um
here you go azov stall is ukraine
thank you yellow on its way to michigan
thank you so much galo appreciate you
man and um yeah tomorrow the weather is
gonna be beautiful but guys guess what
because i gotta focus on the channel
right now and i'm like in a really bad
precarious situation
um i am not taking tomorrow off
i usually take saturday saturdays off to
go um visit family
and tomorrow i'm not taking the day off
i'm going to be streaming tomorrow i'm
going to be streaming
i'm gonna be streaming until next
saturday at which point i'll take a day
off but i'm gonna be grinding every
single day right
so you can look forward to that
especially since the last few days i've
only been streaming for like two hours
per day right so yeah you can look
forward to me streaming every single day
right
but um
and it's not as much work as before
because these are just four hour streams
right so you know it's not it's not like
i'm streaming six hours continuous
non-stop youtube level engagement
or you know five to eight hours like i
was before playing video games or any
kind of shit like that like i'm actually
you know two hours on youtube is like
four hours on twitch right so
yeah
anyway this is the as of stall is
ukraine and what a heroic picture except
you're missing all of these civilians
and women and children below this guy's
feet
who are being fucking trapped
what is fucking heroic about it just
actually pisses me off like what is
actually fucking heroic about this shit
what is so fucking heroic about having
civilians trapped under your fucking
feet and holding them hostage and using
them
while posturing as some fucking hercules
type of hero oh you're such a big tough
fucking hero
using the you think russia's scared of
you little bitch they're not fucking
scared of you they actually care about
the civilians you're holding hostage
make no fucking mistake about it if you
didn't have these civilians you're
holding hostage russo would storm your
plant
and it would be game over for the
fucking neo-nazis hold up their like
fucking rats and rodents
and you think russia's scared of this
guy you think this guy's a fucking tough
hero that russell's scared of no they're
not you're using civilians as fucking
hostages and it's the only fucking
deterrent to russia storming this place
and the world deserves to fucking know
that
it's actually insane that people don't
fucking know that
what fucking cowards it's unbelievable
it's actually unbelievable
this is i this is a i don't i don't know
i mean this is a humanitarian crisis
guys how do you rescue those civilians
these ass off people they got nothing to
lose because if russia captures them
they're either going to be put on trial
for their war crimes they're going to be
taken as prisoners of war and and who
knows what else so they don't really
have anything to lose these are fanatics
who don't give a fuck it's just that
these women and children
who are completely innocent i mean what
how do you rescue these people it's it's
it's like uh it's a classic
counter-terrorism operation of hostage
rescue situation it's a complete
you know and i i heard something before
that most hostage
rescue operations don't work this is the
tragedy right
these people have no honor they're wild
animals they're animals
they don't have anything to fucking lose
and they're more they're more than
willing
to use women and children and civilians
um
as hostages
uh
you know
and prevent anyone from fucking leaving
to the very we're gonna fight to the
very last women and child
is basically what they're fucking saying
here we're gonna fight to the very last
women and child if it's the last thing
we do
we'll fight to the last women and child
if it's the last thing we do
is that's basically what they're saying
here right that's heroism
we have different definitions of heroism
um
now on top of that
the russian ministry of defense is also
reporting
that you the ukrainian side is preparing
another false flag war crime accusation
so in the urban village of
bosc
bosque
region
on the instructions of the afu command
they staged the filming of acts of
looting allegedly committed by the
russian military against civilians
fighters of the 191st battalion of the
103rd territorial defense brigade
dressed in russian uniforms using
vehicles with a z sign were demonstrably
looting private homes and filming their
crimes on cell phones
moscow warns that the civilized west in
advance
that this latest fabrication by kiev
about russian atrocities is to be spread
through objective and independent
western media
now this actually might be a deterrent
for the media to pick this shit up and
do it because like
the ministry of defense has already
reported on it
but who knows most of the time when the
ministry of defense
issues these warnings it doesn't happen
so they catch them before it fucking
happens because you know the way that
these info warriors are they're like
rats they're fucking rodents right they
scurry around they catch russia by
surprise with some insane fucking fake
allegation which the russians you know
because they don't have any time to
defend themselves event they inevitably
become incriminated and accused of shit
they didn't fucking do because they just
don't have time to preemptively act and
they say no we didn't do that so russia
keeps track of all this like rat shit
that ukraine is doing where they're
staging all this shit they're doing all
this kind of stuff and russia basically
says hey we weren't giving you a heads
up ukraine's planning on blaming us for
some bullshit that they fucking staged
in this village
and usually that's kind of like a
deterrent
most of the time i think
i could be wrong and i could have missed
it or maybe the stories didn't go as
viral because again that russian
pre-emptive um
sorry those russian pre-emptive actions
but um
yeah i mean that's basically
how this pattern has been going i mean
usually when russia says they're about
to stage some shit we don't hear about
in the news and the things we do hear
about are the things russia wasn't able
to catch so again they're acting like
fucking rodents and sneaky little
snake-like fucking rats
and all this is to worship the golden
calf by the way of the west oh the
western ideals allow us to do anything
civilian doesn't matter no honor
anything all for the golden calf of the
dream of europe
act like fucking wild animals
for what
holy shit and void burn for some reason
it's not reading your super chat
you might have said some bad words but
holy fuck thank you so much and i'm
gonna read out your super chat so
voidburn says i'm behind you all the way
don't ever let these pharisees these
deceitful absolute scum fuck bastards
ever hold you down cause doubt within
your soul or deter you from expressing
your truth the truth may be painful for
some but it liberates us all voidburn
thank you so much for that donation holy
fuck
um
thank you so much man i appreciate that
so much
um
that's very much uh
so appreciated man thank you
thank you insane donation
insane donation
right
um thank you so much man
but um yeah in the urban village of
so yeah they're warning about this
happening preemptively right
and
hopefully this doesn't it it will it'll
be a deterrent for them to spread the
latest i mean aren't you guys getting
fucking exhausted every time they like
spread this bullshit and they just do
this shit we're like oh my god ladies i
mean doesn't it kind of like fucking
bother you a little bit or just at least
it's it's like
it got to the point for me where i
stopped covering it because i was
getting so sick of the barrage of lies i
was like okay clearly like
we can't address all of these claims at
once so i'm just gonna say that they're
all bullshit and move on right because
there's so much of it
thankfully
there is another team there is another
side to this info war of people
valiantly fighting against
is barrage of propaganda there's been a
division of labor where people are
left and right confronting the
propaganda addressing it and responding
to it
and that is all thanks to the fact that
you guys
right it's all thanks to you guys really
it's thanks to the fact that we have a
community
which is backing us up
through thick and thin right
i mean um
that's what i consider to be like the
fact that there's some people that are
able to see past the fucking propaganda
that's incredible that's a level of
resilience right that you just would not
expect from this type of internet
but i mean again the only weapon they
have at their fucking disposal
censorship
and the platforming the only reason
you're able to get to see this fucking
news presented in this fucking way is
because we're not being censored or
de-platformed yet right that's the only
real weapon
they
they have at their disposal i want to
remind you guys
none of them want to debate about this
that piece of shit adam something won't
debate me about it adam something's a
fucking pussy he lied and said that me
and jackson avoided a debate with him
actually he's the one who fucking ran
away and wouldn't debate about anything
we wanted to debate him i still want to
debate that guy
he's still running away we have all the
receipts and dm's through it so none of
these people will debate about this
topic they're all too fucking scared
they just channel their resentment and
anger and um
bitterness
through other means and through other
forms
right
so that's what they fucking do
it's all resentment bitterness and anger
you know i got completely d platformed
from twitch
that's a debate now isn't it oh you're
so willing to debate me about this topic
you have to go and fucking de-platform
me and censor me right and the most
pathetic thing of all is like you'd
think since almost all of my growth
has been on twitch that that would have
been the end of me
but it hasn't somehow it hasn't somehow
we're still here and i have about half
of the views i had on twitch but still
half
is more than nothing right especially
because it's an entirely new platform
all of the growth i made on twitch was
on twitch those were twitch viewers on
twitch by the way not youtube viewers
there's a strong core of 300 people that
make this possible
um
and it's the only reason i'm still here
it's because of those 300 spartans that
make this shit possible in the first
place right
and you know this is going to be a big
test of endurance because if we endure
if we endure through this we'll endure
through anything right
if we grow through this we'll grow
through anything this is going to be the
test of whether or not we can survive on
another platform because after let's say
i grow on youtube and prove i can do
that
that'll incentivize me to say you know
what if youtube de-platforms me i'll go
on rumble i'll go on another fucking
platform and we'll grow all over again
right
but until then we have our core of 300
spartans
you know i appreciate your guys's
support so much i appreciate all the
donations not just the donations i just
appreciate the people sticking around
the og's the real ones that stick around
instead of the pussies who fucking
what
all fled and scattered like mice
the minute the opportunity
presented itself to
right do that
so anyway
uh this is kind of a little more minor
in the news but it is something i do
think is worth reporting on the very
least
and that ladies and gentlemen
is something a little spooky
in the spirit of um
in april halloween i guess well
apparently
now i don't know if you guys know this
but the as off terrorists are nazis so
nazis are pagans
and pagans are also big into the occult
right
it's on their ruins it's on their
symbols it makes up their ideology these
are pagans they're into the occult
hate christianity they're absolutely
enemies of christianity in every
possible and conceivable way right
and that's basically what you're dealing
with here right
thank you tristan appreciate
but i like your passion thanks for
teaching us about things not spoken
about in the msm also de-radicalizing us
from western prop thank you so much
tristan appreciate you so much
thank you anonymous i appreciate it so
much man thank you
um
so here you go
this is an actual azov pagan occult site
is
thank you so much man appreciate it
appreciate you so much
so this is the spooky weird
pagan
occult site
as of set up and
i we're going to talk about this because
i really think if you let it seep in to
what extent
this is actually like
well i'll let the videos
um
the 300 spartans will follow us wherever
he goes thank you johnny appreciate you
so much let me tell you guys something
this is actually fucking insane
so
when you actually try and think about
like what fundamental worldview can a
human being have
that leads them to have such a level of
criminal depravity and evil just
outright human evil
as the as of terrorists and the rest of
them right
when you start thinking about these
things you ask the basic question
of
they express this evil it's not just
like blank 300 spartans cannot be
stopped infrared will rise to the sun
truth and knowledge are on our side not
the troglodyte liberals thank you so
much you appreciate you man
yeah it's it's it's really a matter here
of
they give expression to their evil they
have encyclopedias
of their evil right it's actually like
very specific and it's in the form of
this paganism this paganism is like the
different gods that they worship and
this occult sickening shit i mean it's
really weird how you can just be like
this you can just be like this ragged
bandit terrorist on the ground and
somehow you're getting the same level of
like wavelength and frequency as far as
like your this fundamental evil is
concerned as our own pagan elites it's
like they have this paganism in common
where they're just worshiping these
bizarre forces
that lead to the same outcomes and the
same types of behaviors
and the same types of anti-human
depravity it's like
what does it actually mean to be a pagan
like the azov people and worship all
these demonic entities and worship all
these different fucking gods well if you
ask me it means to worship the same
things that are elites worship it means
to tap into the vital source
of american hegemony right this
internet media cultural hegemony they
have and that they exercise over you
know hundreds of millions of people
[Music]
cool
within the pagan system but ultimately
being pagan is about causing a
consequence on the material world
through the act of sacrifice thank you
vary sattva and it just kind of sounds
scary to me like
causing an act through sacrifice it's
like
that's a little scary i don't know it
just sounds
i mean what our azov sacrificing
women and children in the bottom of us
off stall
you know it's like it's just
just spooky stuff
but thank you so much for the super chat
um
having bataille flashbacks about
sacrifice
by the
way damn
sacrifice
sacrifice
damn
damn
damn
damn
no further comment but damn i can't
really talk about it
but um
[Music]
all right so we have been able to kind
of like
paint a pretty specific
in-depth
kind of deep dive into what's been going
on in azov stall recently and what's
been going on as far as the future of
ukraine and the region but it's always
opportunities like this where we need to
take a step back a little bit and we
need to ask tougher questions like
how did we get here
and what is the fundamental and
underlying history
of what's happened here right
how did we get to a point where nova
russia is going back to russia and how
did we get to a point
where
ukraine as a state is no longer going to
exist
i am not really satisfied with
moralistic pictures of good or evil what
i want to set about to do today and what
i want to accomplish definitively
is actually
engage in a type of materialist analysis
of the history of russia and ukraine
following the fall of the soviet union
leading up to the events
of the maidan coup
and the implications that this has
for russia i think you got a sneak peek
and a little bit of a hint of that
in that kind of debate i had with the
lithuanian guy
but we're dealing with a very
interesting scenario which i think
deserves more thought more analysis and
more reflection than just good and bad
narratives about what's been going on
now we know for a fact that the western
press is full of shit and they're
inaccurately reporting on what's going
on and i think we get that and i'm not
so much interested anymore in just
reporting the details of that i want us
to think more deeply and broadly as
marxist leninist and with the tools of
analysis available to us
using marxist lenin's theory to be able
to have a superior understanding
of how it got to this point
okay and that's what i i wanna i wanna
set about to do
here right
um so we can have a more kind of neutral
just objective understanding underlying
because i think that's what's missing
right we're caught up in this info war
where they're saying okay they're lying
a lot about russia we're telling the
truth about russia where's the
neutrality where's the objectivity
where's a a basic sense of reality
unpre-trooped by ideological prejudices
and and national passions and things
like that and that's what i want to set
about to accomplish with today's stream
and it actually is going to be the main
theme of today's stream it's going to be
about the future of russia itself where
russia's going right now what
implications the end of the soviet union
had for russia these kind of big topics
of analysis are basically the meat and
potatoes and the thrust of what
direction i want my future streams to
take in general i don't want to just be
a news streamer i want to be able to
stream
big ideas and and
broader forms of analysis about these
types of things right
so the first thing we have to point out
is there's a lot of details people miss
that are important to bring into the
picture
and we're going to go from an analysis
that's based on the hurried kind of
excitement of what's on the daily
headlines oh russia is doing this we're
just doing that too let's just broaden
the context and create a hermeneutic
circle so i'm going to teach you today
what a hermeneutic circle is
so
a hermeneutic circle is basically a way
of
deriving meaning and knowledge from a
given object or from a different
from a given body of work a book a
region a history whatever you want where
knowing details allows you to paint a
big broad picture and with that big
broad picture you get more details and
with more details the big broad picture
starts to be more complete the issue
with the hermeneutic circle the kind of
paradox it represents is that every
detail of knowledge reflects some broad
picture
but every broad picture is only given
expression through these little details
and they work together dialectically to
give us a more holistic understanding of
the situation so
when we actually have a deep analysis of
what's going on
of the history and all these kinds of
things we're beginning from the
particular then to the universal rather
than the reverse we're not being
beginning from some universal
ideological claim and then
filling in the blanks we're actually
beginning from some kind of objective
analysis right
and
that analysis isn't as informed of all
of the biases and ideological fanaticism
that prevents people from being able to
have an accurate picture of what's going
on sure right but it's also an analysis
that's
going to need to arrive at a positive
objective kind of conclusion rather than
just the fact that okay the west is bad
ukraine's bad azov is bad we get that
but what actually is going on here right
and this speaks to the mission statement
of infrared infrared's original mission
statement was
marxist leninist analysis
beyond the visuals
beyond the visual spectrum right
um beyond the visible spectrum beyond
what's immediately apparent to us so the
first thing i want to present to you is
this article
by catahon the caton institute which
talks pretty briefly about the history
of novoracia and ukraine right
so here they talk about how there are
several lies and this was from 2016
circulating on the internet regarding
former ukraine novorossiya and russia
these lighters spread by the key of
nazis trolls
and your american masters with the
obvious goal of disinformation but only
fools will believe it
so
the first lie you're gonna hear commonly
about the situation is that the
ukrainian people chose to go to the eu
well it's not true
because these people and i'm showing it
to you on a map
chose not to do that they chose to go
toward russia the russian world the
customs union
belarus and kazakhstan
when they elected yanukovych's president
and a pro-russian rada
in the last
legitimate elections before the nazi
coup
then there was a coup directed from the
u.s against the legal president and
government
all elections after the nazi coup are
void and illegal
were neither democratic nor fair as all
the opposition has been banned
imprisoned or killed let no one forget
this
we do not want the traitors to distort
the facts
the russians and nova racia and
malarusia the russian-speaking
ukrainians and the central parts if they
are allowed to speak what they want were
of all the people of mixed origin
the next lie
russia doesn't need navrasia those who
make this statement have no idea about
russian history or culture and they have
no knowledge of geopolitics in general
and security politics in particular
russia needs novarosia for many reasons
first and most important because it is a
genuine part of russia it has been for
300 years
it was stolen from russia during a
period of russian weakness and when
russia was ruled by american lackeys in
the 1990s
the majority of the people in
novorossiya are russians or
russian-speaking ukrainians who are
opposed to the ki of junta and who want
to join the russian world
but nova racia is also a shield of
russia against nato aggression and enemy
military bases now this is what i really
want to highlight here
because when it comes to coming to a
materialist analysis of why novador sia
is so important we can't just proceed a
kind of national analysis we can't just
proceed even from a perspective of
military strategy because ultimately war
is an extension of politics and this
would be engaging in the kind of
cardinal sin of idealism it would be
assuming that political formations are
what's behind all this it would be
assuming even that national formations
are behind what's all this when a
materialist is going to proceed
at the most fundamental level of what
the essence of all those things are what
makes a nation what makes politics this
is what's at stake in being able to form
a coherent
and sustainable analysis
of what's been going on in ukraine
so the same is true for eastern mellorca
all lands east of the dniper i can't
pronounce that correctly is russian land
paid for by russian blood
many times over through history it is
treason to even think of abandoning
these lands to nazis and to nato
yet another lie to be exposed there will
be a world war if russia liberates
novorossiya
this is absurd and it's contradicted by
statements from the europe and usa
none are prepared to go to war to save
some nazis in kiev especially as any
russian liberation
would be just that a liberation and not
an occupation
this liberation would not be extended to
galicia because that part was never
genuine russian land and is too infected
with nazis to be worth the cost of
denotification so if you don't know what
galatia is
right
um
alicia is right here
sorry
fuck
it's different there's one in spain and
there's one in france it's right here
right
so this is what they're talking about
this part was never historically russian
land it was taken from the polls i think
by stalin
it had
belarusian and ukrainian populations
living there which the polls oppressed
but historically speaking i mean this is
austria-hungary this is the polish
lithuanian commonwealth whatever it's
not really historically russian land
they don't think they're ever going to
be able to take this right
they have no illusions as far as that's
concerned
you know another lie is that the russian
world is only russia now this is a
pretty interesting part of the article i
think
is people think these are fascists
you know because these are the fourth
position is duganist or so these might
be fastest well look what they're saying
and this is gonna actually piss off a
lot of like
alt-right
you know type of people but this is what
they say
actually there are no limits to the
russian world if a person would like to
join the russian world for whatever
reason they should be welcome
it could be that a person has a russian
spouse
likes russian culture or russian
orthodoxy or lifestyle and so on
and i'm not talking about creating
ghettos like what happened in western
europe any person joining the russian
world should be willing to assimilate at
least to a certain degree to russian
society without having to deny his her
own roots
russia ought to in half a million such
people from all over the world annually
and they should preferably be young and
educated or willing to get an education
in the new country
there are quite a lot of such people all
over the world that would give russia a
chance
that would boost the russian economy and
society too and of course refugees from
former ukraine and overseas should also
be taken into russia
but with a clear understanding that they
will be returned to a liberated
novrossia and malarosia sooner or later
geopolitically geographically it's of
course easier to define the russian
world
russian federation plus belarus plus
northern kazakhstan
plus navarasia plus eastern malarosia
transnistria
and some regions of the baltics such as
narva
any part of this territory is just as
holy and russian as as moscow
should be as equally defended
so that's a kind of picture of the
geopolitical
vision underlying this but i think
that's the kind of weakness of our
analysis thus far is that we have
overwhelmingly relied on a geopolitical
based analysis a political based
analysis in general almost everything i
just described to you and read out to
you in that article ultimately boils
down to politics it doesn't boil down to
a materialist conception or
understanding of the situation
in order to break that down we need a
deeper understanding of the
circumstances surrounding the fall of
the soviet union and the implications it
had for the peoples living in that
region in a material sense okay
and we're going to begin here with the
donbass itself and its significance i
want to paint a picture to you because i
think it's pretty easy to draw
materialist analysis of american
politics
specifically when it comes to regions
like west virginia west virginia was a
coal mining state
and you know that's where joe manchin
and the rest are based that's where a
lot of republicans and support for trump
is based is that you basically had these
heavy industries that defined the
backbone of the american national
economy
and these people's jobs were threatened
or otherwise not invested in it as much
and that's kind of defined the politics
of the region it's about preserving that
older way of life and i think that's a
really easy materialist analysis
to draw from to explain a lot about
you know what goes on in american
politics why do you have joe manchin and
people like that elected into congress
uh well it's because of coal because the
progressives want to eliminate coal and
coal is the source of livelihood of the
people living in west virginia right and
then you have this whole understanding
of a materialist understanding of
political economy itself where it's
quite literally political economy that
america's regulatory kind of monopoly
state
in conjunction with coal companies and
oil companies and car companies and
manufacturing
all form this kind of totality of an
american dream and an american way of
life which actually defined people's
living being and it defined their way of
life and it defined them as a class a
new type of class
people it's not quite the working class
of the past which you know had no
country it was a working class that
somehow had a country that had some
investment or stake in the state and you
know most marxists are going to define
that as a labor aristocracy but i i
think that's simplistic the the labor
aristocracy lenin talked about was like
the upper stratum of the labor movement
this is a mass phenomena that defined
people from the bottom up the very soil
of the people selves right
unless it happened this kind of
american dream can also be translated in
the soviet and russian context because
just like there was an american dream
there was also a soviet
green in the form
of the soviet
economy itself the heavy industries of
the soviet working class that were
employed i mean this there was a soviet
dream the soviet worker
right had a daca in the con dacha in the
countryside they had a house or an
apartment they had a little farm if they
were peasants toiling on the soil
they had a very specific way of life
that was tied
to heavy industry and to manufacturing
right
they didn't have that service economy
bullshit they didn't have that tech
economy bullshit it was it's very
similar when you compare the american
economy the 20th century
to the soviet economy in the 20th
century from a sociological perspective
there's a lot of differences but there's
also a lot of similarities i mean both
a lot of people get pissed off by this
but i mean you're dealing with a
situation where most of the world is
turning in a socialistic direction the
us included the state is increasingly
becoming a worker state where its vast
regulations and its vast mechanisms of
economic control
have to take into account
people's ability to like get by and it
has to take social considerations into
account has to take the life of the
working class and the american dream
into account i'm not saying the american
state served the working class it was a
workers state a sense of a proletarian
dictatorship clearly it was a state that
served the interests of financiers and
financial capitalists and capitalist
monopolists and
city of london bankers and all those
kind of fucking spooky people whatever
right um
but this st i'm just trying to say that
there were aspects of it that you could
you could vaguely collect if you're not
too autistic about it say it's a workers
state you know if you get autistic about
it clearly it's not a workers state but
to some extent the state and the economy
is being fashioned around the
reproduction of a very specific way of
life now the intention behind that as
far as the ruling class in the
bourgeoisie was concerned in the 20th
century was to make
sure that the working class would be
satisfied and complacent and wouldn't
turn to communism right so that was the
reason that was the motivation and that
was the intention behind that and i
don't think it was only that either i
think to in a certain extent the
democratic party and other parties did
kind of
you know
gain their mandate and their power from
this kind of working class um but they
were still captured and completely
beholden to these capitalists but there
was some measure of a state
infrastructure that had emerged
that
wasn't directly controlled by the
capitalist class if that makes sense
like it was this arrangement you can
vaguely call it socialistic you can call
it whatever the fuck you want but it
existed for social reasons it didn't
just exist to make the capitalists rich
it ultimately figured in the wider
imperialist state machinery sure
especially the system of global
imperialist control sure
but the only real evidence that you need
that it wasn't directly serving the
interests of capital lies in the fact
that in the so-called era of
neoliberalism much like the
dismantlement of the ussr and the soviet
union itself this entire thing was
dismantled right it was it was
completely divested
the state ceased to invest in it the
people in west virginia were left behind
the people in ohio and detroit indiana
were left behind manufacturing was
outsourced to mexico and it was
outsourced overseas so very clearly that
degree of socialization that had
occurred after the post-war period
wasn't only to support profit
there was a degree of like american
socialism that emerged i mean
say was
ultimately fascistic or social fascist
i'm open to that interpretation as well
but i i don't buy the idea that it was
just oh this is just part of capital
it's no it's clearly this is a post
not post imperialist because it's still
part of imperialism right but it's it's
something beyond what lenin described in
imperialism is all i'm trying to say
right
someone's in show queue
um
no yeah okay
this i'm gonna get through this lecture
and then we might be able to take in
collins if we have some time to spare
right because i want to get into this
deep dive of analysis so i'm going to
show you a map right now
of what is actually the part eastern
ukraine and the donbass region right
so this was a propaganda poster from the
soviet period
and what you're witnessing here is that
this part is powering the entirety
of the soviet union's economy and its
industry so factories all over the
soviet union
being powered by this now what is this
what actually is this
well where it is
is in the eastern part of ukraine it's
in the dawn bass but what
is it
well if you speak russian
i think it's here but
it's coal
so this is a basin in eastern ukraine
that was responsible for the
overwhelming majority of the energy
consumption of the soviet union
internally now the soviet union was an
oil exporting
country after the 1970s
but in terms of the internal consumption
of energy that fueled soviet industry
itself
um this was coming from the donetsk
basin
similar to west virginia right it's just
this part of soviet union just like west
virginia is a part of america which is a
coal producing region okay
and that was actually the source of
livelihood
for the people living here so all of the
infrastructure
that was built in the dunya in the
donbass region
right
all of the way of life the education the
facilities the food that people
consumed the way in which they consumed
it all that was through the wealth
that was being um
created because of coal
because of the specific economic
arrangement it had with the rest of the
soviet union
so
and to give more context to give more
added context to this
um
to this day the infrastructure the
cities the towns that exist in the
donbass region
are a leftover of that soviet era
so that's the first thing i want you
guys to keep in mind and keep in in your
head right
it's a very important point
i want you guys to lodge it and keep it
in your heads
that's the context of the donetsk region
i'll show you a more contemporary map
show you the significance school still
has thank you i think slow expansion of
socialism in u.s is bad because it gives
people enough reason to not overthrow
government as a whole like marx intended
no and the reasons people have to
overthrow the government isn't to
establish socialism now that's a common
myth a lot of people will tell you oh we
need a revolution to create socialism
anyone who tells you that revolutions
are about creating socialism is a dumb
fuck doesn't know shit about history or
marxism and is a fucking lying dumb
piece of shit okay
first of all
marx talked about violent revolutions
within the context of overthrowing the
ancient regime so those were revolutions
that weren't being created because of
ideology but were revolutions like the
french revolution that
took form because of an antagonism
between a democratic petty bourgeoisie
from the countryside
and the aristocrats and feudal ancient
regime so that was actually the source
of revolution marx was talking about
okay
and marx was basically saying that the
proletarian revolution
is going to be like a cherry on top of
this and he said that in places that
have already had their democratic
revolution like the united states or
even england he said right it's possible
for a peaceful transition to occur now
the reason marx and engels change their
view about this is because of the rise
of the imperialist state machinery
which actually overturned a bourgeois
democracy
right and it had to be smashed into a
thousand pieces marx writes about this
in his writings on the civil war in
france also in his writings about the
paris commune more generally right
and
that isn't because again it's not
because of ideology it's because
contradiction is forming between the
vast state bureaucratic machinery and
this imperialist state machinery and
again
uh the proverbial peasant in the
countryside in marx's case the french
peasant who's being indebted to banks
um
and who's having all of their economic
life being sucked out of them
again through through rentier capitalist
feudal-like monopolists right so the
reasons violent revolutions happen
according to marxism is not
because the proletarian dictatorship
should be established it's not because
of some fucking ideological vision it's
not because of socialism it's not
because of any of those fucking things
violent revolution is an inev it's a
sociological phenomena it's what we call
today populism it's literally the same
thing it's a sociological phenomena
where the majority of people materially
enter into contradiction
with the establishment
just as a general law of social
revolution right
and
the whole point of ideology is to guide
that not to create it that's what
happened in russia the contradiction
between the peasants and russia and the
the
the the tsar and the nobility wasn't
because of ideology it was because there
was a genuine material contradiction
there which the bolsheviks only led
that's why they said peace land and
bread and not
socialism they didn't say any of that
shit they said peace land and bread
because they were leading
that
revolution okay
so
yeah i know that's a lot of time taken
up for one super chat but it's something
i just need to always stress time and
time again that it's just such a common
myth
people arrive at that that revolutions
are because of you know whatever so
anyway this is a more contemporary map
of ukraine
and look at this okay so
so here this region of ukraine produces
18.4
billion tons of coal
15.6 billion tons of coal five point
three billion tons of coal so this is
the donets
region we're talking about here in
ukraine
um
so
nationally speaking yes these people are
russian speakers
many are ethnic russians
but what is the more fundamental
connection that they have to russia
that is actually responsible
for the conflict
at large
well it has a lot to do again with coal
now after the fall of the soviet union
okay
um
investing in coal well a few things
happen right and this is true for both
russia
and it's true for ukraine and this is
actually going to be the formative
context of the maidan protests which is
why the story of how ukraine and russia
got to this point
is actually kind of more like a tragedy
rather than a one-sided story of good
versus evil it's more like a tragedy
ukraine had most of soviet heavy
industry it was built specifically to
cooperate with russian industry the
separation of russia and ukraine was
particularly painful the atlanticist
plan thank you so much chris morlock i
appreciate so much the that super chat
thank you so much man
anyway um
when the soviet union collapsed i'm sure
you guys know what happened you had an
oligarchic class emerge both in russia
and in ukraine
so all of the industry as morlock
himself pointed out that was built up
under the soviet union
throughout all of ukraine not just
eastern ukraine all of ukraine
was bought out by these oligarchs right
and what oligarchs basically did is that
they privatized socialism they kept
these very vast
companies and entities intact that were
kind of like fractures of they were kind
of little pieces of the soviet giant
central planning what the oligarchs did
is they consolidated
all of these kinds of means of
production
in the form of these like privatized
socialistic
equity companies and general companies
and whatever
bundled them all together into this kind
of like private form of a mini centrally
planned economy and private kingdom
where the
a lot of people need to understand this
much of the necrosis of the soviet
industry
is because of the oligarchs the
oligarchs are parasites what they did is
that they took all of the infrastructure
that was built under the soviet union
and they turned those into financial
speculative assets
they didn't invest in them they didn't
update any of the infrastructure they
just extract rent from that
infrastructure from the former soviet
peoples in order to turn them into like
financial assets which are then
integrated into the world of
international finance and offshore
companies through the city of london and
all that kind of stuff so basically the
soviet economy wasn't actually dissolved
a lot of people think oh socialism was
abolished well
ideologically yeah but in terms of that
like centrally planned economy in
general it was divided up into little
bits and pieces where these like new
lords these for all intents and purposes
feudal lords took over these segments of
this wider soviet planned economy
and
they kept them running and kept them
intact but they charge the right the
former soviet population like these
rents
in order to be able to live so these are
like literally like vampire parasites
who took over segments of the former
soviet economy right
and unlike the soviet union they didn't
reinvest in this stuff they didn't
update it in any kind of way or
integrated into like this greater
polarity or greater whole that benefits
the whole people you know as a holistic
entity they turned them into financial
assets and instruments integrated into a
world of international finance
centered in the city of london
i should add and and wall street and
whatever right
basically turning them into parts of the
kind of western polarity now russia's
game-changing nationalization of the oil
industry under putin was pretty much the
first act that offset that and
established some form of economic
sovereignty now when we're talking about
economic sovereignty i wanna
don't just like let that fly over your
head i actually want you to think about
what that entails economic sovereignty
means you basically
are having a part of your economy that
is being organized around serving your
economy and serving your sphere so in
this case
russia's oil industry allows the russian
government to invest in its population
it allows them to build russian
industries it allows them to fuel and
power a russian economy right whereas in
the oligarchic type of arrangement of
the privatizations of the 1990s both in
ukraine and in the former sorry and in
russia you had these basic parasites
gobble up
big pieces of the former soviet planned
economy
um keep the people who relied on them in
order to survive on a lifeline and
basically charge them rent to continue
existing and subsisting
on them so basically i want to like give
you a better representation of what that
would be like right so let's say
you were like on life support in a
hospital right and that was basically
kind of free right i just put it that
way and some guy comes and and takes
over the life support with a gun
and he says
i'm gonna call your mother every hour
she's gonna give me five dollars or i'm
gonna unplug your life support
that's pretty much
how the oligarchic
organization of the economy is is in
ukraine and russia
right
it's like they're basically
holding these
things that are the life support of the
people living in these regions
and they're they're they're it's they're
not even like good capitalists a lot of
people think oh russia became a
capitalist economy well technically in
an ideal world
a capitalist
you know
makes an investment and then gets a
return on their investment but in this
case you just have this kind of
privatization of a very stagnant
and decaying form of socialism where
it's like
they're not in it's not like they're
making profits based on returns on on
risky investments they're holding these
gargantuan
bits and pieces of the former soviet
infrastructure
and charging people who relied on them
as a source of livelihood and
subsistence
in order to squeeze out not profits and
this is the
most fascinating part of this entire
dilemma that's why you can't
understand this conflict from like an
anti-capitalist traditional critique of
capitalism perspective
but from rents right from rents of the
financial economy right
so
haas can you debate michael moore yeah i
could debate this guy if he gets in my
fucking vc okay i could definitely
debate him okay stop spamming my chat
michael get in my fucking vc or get
banned forever it's simple as that
you stupid fuck
and by the way russia doesn't pretend to
be a liberal democratic country that's
why you dumb fuck if the west wants to
come forward and admit we live in a
fascist fucking state then it can
fucking do that and and and cure the
repercussions that comes from violating
the fucking social contract that is the
bedrock of order and stability the
reason people don't fucking take up
torches and pitchforks
like thomas jefferson talked about is
because we have constitutional liberties
if they want to create a new arrangement
where they want to be an illiberal
democracy
then they can go ahead and step forward
and tell the people that that's what
we're living under until then you got to
still have that free speech
because that's the understanding that
our people and the government have come
to since 1776. that's my fucking answer
to you you stupid dumb fuck now stop
fucking spamming my fucking chat
especially when you say something so
fucking stupid
okay
as i was saying before
okay i want to give you a broad picture
of the oligarch economy so what did you
learn from this okay a the soviet union
collapsed
the soviet economy was still the source
of survival and livelihood for the
majority of people living under it what
happened is that this soviet economy was
privatized by
these
parasitical financial capitalists who
did not reinvest in the infrastructure
but merely kept that on a lifeline
leaving both it and the people relying
on it to decay
left behind while extracting rents not
profits from them and these rents in
turn were turned into financial
derivative as speculative assets
derivative assets basically that were
integrated into the world capitalist
financial market through the city of
london and its offshore companies yada
yada yada wall street and the rest of it
so that's the basic rundown of the
picture that's forming the context of
this entire thing okay
i want you to keep that in mind as we go
forward keep what i just told you in
mind
okay and stop fucking being distracted
in the chat do i have to start banning
people because
this shit is important you know i don't
i'm sick of this being a community of
dumb fucks yeah go ahead and just spam
z's in my chat but you don't actually
want to be fucking educated
you don't want to be educated about
what's fucking going on in the first
place you want to just spam zs in the
fucking chat
what's a dumb fucks stop fucking
focusing on one dumbass who's too much
of a pussy to get in my fucking vc
if you don't get in my v okay mods ban
everyone who doesn't
get in my vc who talk shit because
clearly people are getting too fucking
distracted by bullshit
when what i'm talking about is actually
fucking important
right
damn
you want to just spam z's and shit but
you don't want to actually think about
this in any kind of fucking way it's
fucking pathetic
okay anyway
like i was saying
now the main thing that upset this
arrangement
was
putin's rise to power now a lot of
people underestimate the extent to which
there was a level of continuity between
the yeltsin regime which was completely
captured by the oligarchs and putin
there was continuity putin was appointed
by yeltsin
so the reason putin
came to represent russian sovereignty is
the the fact of the matter that we now
have to address okay because putin again
was appointed he wasn't a populist he
was appointed okay
he didn't rise to power as like a
caesarean populist like hugo chavez or
anything he was appointed by yeltsin
okay
now some deeper context here the context
of putin is politics specifically
geopolitics the first form of a major
rift between the west and russia
was yugoslavia it was serbia
and yeltsin actually this was the first
form of the expression of some kind of
like it wasn't just yugoslavia there's a
lot of unresolved shit in abkhazia in
south ossetia in transnistria and
elsewhere right
russia was thrown into this situation
where even yeltsin and the oligarchs
supporting him
had to be russian patriots in some kind
of sense now why was it in the interest
of the parasitical oligarchic class
to kind of adopt a russian geopolitical
vision well the reason is pretty simple
because
in order to be able to maintain the
steady flow of financial rents
that they were extracting from the
privatization of the former soviet
economy
they had to consider russia
as a block with its own interests that
it has to defend i mean it they're
basically tried to turn russia into a
cartel
one big cartel enterprise whose interest
they were willing to defend on that
basis okay
and this is basically going to like
define
the entire tragical contradiction that
defines russia's current geopolitical
predicament okay
when putin was appointed
putin made the decision to nationalize
russia's gas industry
basically cementing the first form
of russian economic sovereignty
and at that point
the very same al and also by the way the
geopolitical issue was chechnya right
and that's what putin dealt with and and
so on and so on and that's that whole
issue of geopolitics defending russia's
territorial sovereignty
right as a kind of cartel for these
oligarchs
but putin would then turn against these
oligarchs
for reasons that may relate to personal
ideology
something like that
but putin did cross the rubicon and his
julius caesar moment
was when he decided to nationalize the
russian oil industry turn against the
oligarchs
right
and start to derive his mandate
from the russian people
so in a way
and this may come to a shock to many of
you
russia became more democratic now in
talks with us diplomats
russian oligarchs ad verbatim said
russia is not a western country russia
is an asiatic country so we cannot have
an immediate transition to democracy we
have to have an oligarchy because
russians are too savage and uncivilized
to be able to be democratic and rule
based on a majoritarian
you know
uh
rule by the people the people are too
stupid and uncivilized to rule so us
oligarchs have to be in charge almost ad
verbatim when they were sitting down
with us diplomats this is what the
oligarchs had told
the americans
well putin um was increasing the
democratization of russia by having the
actual source of legitimation and
sovereignty of the russian state not
come from a select group of oligarchic
rulers but come from more or less a
popular mandate of the russian people
now putin is not a savior of the russian
people i want you guys to to understand
that he's not like some julius caesar
communist and he's all doing it out of
the goodness of his heart and it's
because he's a socialist or he's doing
it for ideological reason
reasons
putin was confronted with like a a
rubicon and just to be a normal centrist
right it's like
nationalizing the oil industry
will give the russian state a definite
source of revenue with which it will be
able to sustain
the russian people on a lifeline because
the oligarchs are not able to do this in
a disparate dissipated
way so under putin's reign
and this is where we're going to really
start talking about the tragical aspect
of this
um
you still had the same level of decay
necrosis
and
stagnation that define the rule of the
oligarchs the only difference is that
there was increasingly a semblance of a
new type of russia i mean moscow sure as
hell
got a hell of a renovation under putin's
reign
uh and other parts of russia admittedly
as well other stuff was going on but for
the majority of the russian people
um you know they were living in the same
way that people in in ukraine was
basically living in a lifeline
but
lifeline being pensions pensions for the
elderly
um
the kind of menial jobs
the working class as they had before and
then moscow also represented this kind
of more urban economy with more urban
oriented jobs
or and then also you had this immense
flight from russia the rain drain and
people migrants going to the west young
people looking for opportunities there
but also moscow did turn start to be a
bedrock for new entrepreneurs and and
new kind of startups and new kinds of
businesses that was enabled by this
newfound russian economic sovereignty
all of these things undermine the
oligarchs right
so russia is in this steady steady state
of basic survival survival people
pensioners are still getting their money
the russian people are surviving and
enduring
that's not nothing because in the 90s
they were dying they were dying of early
mortality they were dying they weren't
being supported by the state there was
nothing
they were dying right so they're
surviving under putin but under putin
you still have stagnation
you still have some of that same
oligarchic control of the former soviet
economy you still have that necrosis you
still have that parasitism you still
have this kind of sale of the russian
people to the western financial
capitalist world market in the form of
derivative and speculative assets right
this is true not only for russia but for
the entire former soviet world
russia's stagnating now under medvedev
they wanted to even get closer to the
west to geopolitically to con
conciliatory with them for geopolitical
reasons they couldn't
now let me tell you uh let me give you a
picture right now of um
ukraine's exports
russia and russia's exports to ukraine
now here you can clearly see
these are all heavy industry
i mean these are all heavy and so these
are kind of manufactured goods
and these are more um
what do you call it primary processed
raw materials these are kind of more
chemicals
this is um iron and steel and things
like that these are kinds of like
manufactured industrial goods
so this is basically what
ukraine is exporting to russia right
but you have to understand that these
are all controlled under the uh these
are so i want you to think of it like
the intestines of the soviet economy
ripped out
right
and privatized under the control of
oligarchs and oligarchic families
and
there was a semblance of a centrally
planned soviet economy and the bits and
pieces of this economy were now being
privatized by these like feudal lords
right who are extracting monopoly rents
feudal-like monopoly rents in order to
facilitate similar levels of economic um
activity that happened in the soviet
union so like the iron that ukraine is
exporting to russia
was probably also iron that
that's factories or whatever based in
russia we're getting from ukraine as
well so the semblance of this former
soviet economy is being kept on a
lifeline right
um
now
what were what
what really underlied the history
that led to the maidan and the
dissatisfaction with russia and the
dissatisfaction with putin well
stagnation continued to more or less
define
the whole russian sphere russia itself
and ukraine under yanukovych
yes survival survival yes
but innovation opportunity
no
those are the things that were missing
and
kind of understandably in the more
developed parts of western ukraine
people were fed up
with the old arrangement they were fed
up with the corrupt oligarchic class
so there there came to be this kind of
like
illusion by the population and this is
what makes it a fucking tragedy guys
this is literally the crux of what we're
talking about which is like
there's many forms of utopias people
have when they become dissatisfied with
the status quo
and with the prevailing system right
and in ukraine western ukraine's case
the utopia was europe
there was this illusion this idea
that increased economic integration with
europe is going to lead to you know the
the um
the
enrichment of the ukrainian you know
democratic petty bourgeoisie and
startups and entrepreneurs this hungry
youth that are looking for opportunities
oh we'll all get it from increased
economic
cooperation with
with europe and with western europe
right and and europe became this utopia
it became this utopic vision right so
when yanukovych
um so this is the tragedy though so
yanukovych pressured by the western
ukrainian population and also because he
was not actually loyal to russia in the
first place
decided to pursue european economic
integration so he went to brussels and
he went to belgium
and he told the leaders he told the head
of the eu he said listen he told the
eurobank he told all these people he
said listen i am willing to join you i'm
willing to ditch russia and join you my
oligarchs who back me
also want this to happen right
we're done with russia russia's you know
those people they're dead beat their
they're wasteful we don't we can't get
any more profits from them our oligarchs
are hungry for profit they need more
profits
so yeah we'll
we'll join you europe
and we'll ditch russia
but
this is how economically dependent we're
on
with russia now
so if we ditch russia and join you
you have to give us loans and you have
to give us aid and bail out our economy
and help us
what did brussels tell yanukovych
brussels told yanukovych
no way jose
we're not going to invest in you
ukrainians you lowly ukrainians we don't
believe in you you're not an investment
that's worth it to us
if you join the european union
yeah we'll use you as an economic colony
for cheap labor and migrant labor oh boy
yeah and we're going to extract your raw
materials and you know
use you as a debt colony more or less
but seriously restructure your economy
and fill the hole left behind by russia
no way
europe refused to agree
to what ukraine needed in order to join
europe
and leave russia behind
that's the story behind this
and when yanukovych
decided to abandon pursuing economic
integration with europe
not because he didn't want to
but because europe refused to actually
um
fulfill what ukraine would have needed
to do that
there you had maidan and we have to ask
this question beyond america's
intervention
right beyond america's intervention um
beyond the cia interference and all that
shit let's just put that behind why were
so many people in kiev and western
ukraine angry with the government
that oh we're not joining europe because
you're in bed with russia because this
is the impression they had in their mind
they thought
okay
europe represents for me economic
opportunity it represents a future for
us it represents us to be able to you
know update our infrastructure
have just have a semblance of a future
ahead where we don't have to
be in stagnation and decay and
corruption for so long right
so
that was the thought that they had in
their head and when they when yanukovych
turned
his back on on the european integration
thing they were like
he only did this because of putin and he
only did this because of russia because
of the corruption of the oligarchs the
same oligarchs that they associated with
this stagnant post-soviet world right
so they thought basically that it's
almost as if putin is preventing us the
russian world is presenting us our
blackened soviet past is preventing us
from having any more economic
opportunities and we're stuck in this
hellish decay and stagnation of the
former soviet world and we're gonna
blame it all on russia
the truth is more tragic
it's not yanukovych it's not putin it's
not even the oligarchs
that are the reason europe rejected you
europe rejected you because europe
doesn't care about ukraine europe
doesn't care about ukrainians europe
doesn't see them as equal europe had no
intention of investing in ukraine and
helping ukrainians
no longer become dependent on russia
because the europeans have nothing
historically to do with ukraine when
germany invaded ukraine in world war ii
they had a plan to starve anyone there
and loot all the fucking resources and
have german settlers settle the land
they are entirely different peoples
europeans don't give a fuck about
ukraine
that's the tragic truth that's why
yanukovych couldn't pursue
european economic integration
that's why
but the maidan protesters
angry with the corruption and angry with
the stagnation angry with the lack of
opportunity
decided that europe was their utopia
okay
and it was a kind of like deranged form
of utopian socialism that quickly
transformed into a very scary nazism and
genocidal fascism where their dream came
at the expense of reality and that
russians are getting in the way of our
dream
so that's the scenario you have in the
western ukraine right
now going from heaven to earth from
dreamland back to reality you have the
people of eastern ukraine
now the people of eastern ukraine
are getting by they're getting by
through economic aid getting by through
vestigial industries from the soviet era
and yeah there's not a lot of
improvement or whatever but they're
primarily focused with just not starving
and just having some lifeline right
so they see what's going on in the
maidan and they
quite correctly see this like these
people want to destroy everything they
want to destroy everything we have and
they want to destroy us as a people
because we ourselves only exist because
of the soviet past our infrastructure
our way of life our culture
our ability to get an income everything
about us
comes from the soviet past
and you want to take all of that away
and destroy us so it's almost like this
is the tragedy in western ukraine it
became a kind of struggle for becoming
and struggle for future and
transformation
but in eastern ukraine it was a struggle
for being
a struggle for surviving
and a struggle to defend the past
right
so you basically had
a very tragic situation
where
both people in russia and in ukraine
are not necessarily aware of the fact
that the reason you're stagnating the
reason you don't have these new
opportunities the reason you don't have
this kind of like you know reinvestment
in your own people the reason nobody's
willing to invest in you
the people
whether it's europe or whether it's this
you know necrophiliac
kind of post-soviet oligarchic economy
it's very simple
it's because russia turned away from
communism
and communism was the only fucking thing
that invested in these people
it turned from an economy
that was based
in what's in the best interests of the
common people
to an economy that was based on liberal
capitalist
bullshit free market principles which in
reality translated into abandoning in
almost a genocidal way
the people and leaving them to rot
at best
or allowing them to subsist at best and
leaving them to decay and die
at worst
that's the entire context that's
informing
his situation people who were angry with
the yanukovych government
were not necessarily at fault it's just
that they articulated it in the wrong
way in a delusionary illusory way
the real enemy of the ukrainian people
also never forget how almost immediately
after health care was privatized in the
russian federation nearly 7 million
rural russians died from lack of health
care now necrosis and decay rises in
ukraine and oligarchs think they own the
russian people holy fuck voidbring thank
you so much for the 50 man and i agree
yeah appreciate it so much
appreciate it so much man
i appreciate that so much but um
the the bottom line guys is that the
enemy of the ukrainian and russian
people alike
it's not a national issue when you think
about it like this it's a class issue
with a civilizational context the
civilization created by the soviet union
it's these oligarchs
who converted the post-soviet economy
into a feudalistic rentier state
where they extract from the lifeblood
of the former soviet peoples
while giving nothing back and investing
nothing in them especially investing
nothing in the youth and investing
nothing in the new generation
okay
so you may ask me a question haas then
why do you support russia when russia
also has these people in power
because you have to understand the
context of the revolution that's going
on in the russian world
which is for all intents and purposes
also a social and class revolution
against the oligarchs
and that's something i'm gonna explain
to you if you don't understand
what i'm talking about now
because that's what's really going on
since
the revolutions
they're very much heideggerian
revolutions for being in eastern ukraine
you had a profound class and social
revolution initiate
which will undoubtedly spread to russia
even if it comes at the expense of putin
himself
i'll show it to you
now check this out this is a story
published by the new york times
on march 4th
2014.
now why am i showing you an article from
2014 because in the eastern ukraine
immediately after the maidan which
duped
the urbanites of western ukraine into
actually serving the interests
of oligarchic factions of the
post-soviet world that were against
russia
as tensions rose on the streets of the
russian-speaking eastern portion of
ukraine the response of the new
government in the capital on sunday was
not to send troops
but to send rich people keep in mind
this is
march 2nd 2014.
the interim government worried about
russian efforts to destabilize or seize
regions in eastern ukraine after
effectively taking control of the
crimean peninsula in the south
is recruiting the country's wealthy
businessmen known as oligarchs
to serve as governors of the eastern
provinces
so
as these eastern provinces were up in
arms and were in turmoil trying to kind
of rebel against the new junta to give
you an idea of the maidan government
the response they had to that
thank you so much upstream in a minute
sorry twitch dogged you but glad that
you're still out here grinding and
crushing it cuddy thank you so much
sankara's renault i appreciate you so
much man
well as a basic response to that right
what they did was
send literal oligarchs to be the
governors of these eastern provinces to
reign in on these people
now when i said feudal lords that was
kind of like a metaphor but in this case
it seems like it's direct now wait until
you hear about who these oligarchs are
so the strategy which ukrainian news
media are attributing to yulia v
timochenko a former prime minister and
party leader is recognition that the
oligarchs represent the country's
industrial and business elite
and exercise a great influence over
thousands of workers in the east which
is still largely ethnically russian
now what kind of influence do they
exercise
these oligarchs
own the industries in eastern ukraine
they own the coal mines they own the
mines they own the factories and the
russian workers are their employees
the office of president olexir
v church
tertianov
announced on sunday the appointments of
two billionaires sergey tartura let's
look up this guy sergey tartura
what does he do sergey tartura
is the founder of the industrial union
of donbass
what is the industrial union of donbass
it's an it owns order over 40 industrial
enterprises in eastern ukraine
hungary and poland
um
there you
go
i'm not sure what happened to its
holdings
in eastern ukraine exactly but
this guy
was up this oligarch who i literally
just described to you
the the industries he owns
heard about you through jackson i loved
how you tore apart destiny always good
to hear independent voices that don't
bow to the establishment thank you so
much curtis i appreciate it so much man
that is
appreciate it man um
when i i mean this guy he says he owns
industrial enterprise these are all
enterprises created by communist
infrastructure communism created these
enterprises this fucking parasite just
gobbled them up
and
put them into a fucking holding company
so that's like the definition of what
we're talking about
when it comes to an oligarch now who
else are they mentioning they're talking
about ihor colum kolomoski i you
probably heard of that name before
um
but if you haven't
this guy is the
he
owns where is it
he owns the uh
yeah pre-vet bank
he owns yeah he owns that's just a
fucking private football club it doesn't
matter this is pr they sometimes these
oligarchs buy football clubs like that
guy uh abramovic
owns chelsea or whatever
so this was a private bank that owned
and this is where you're gonna get
the money
right
when 2016 it was nationalized supposedly
but he owns
the vet group yeah prevet group there it
is it's not just a bank it's a group
so it controls thousands of companies of
virtually every industry in ukraine
steel oil gas chemical
energy
the prime influence and expertise
you can bet what that means for eastern
ukraine as well this is the pre-vet
group understand
so these two guys were appointed the
governors of eastern ukraine
so
and and all over you this isn't just
eastern ukraine all over ukraine
oligarchs were appointed directly into
positions of power
to lord over the people of if it wasn't
enough that they fucking owned the
commonwealth of the former soviet
peoples economically they also owned it
now politically
right
this is from
march 19 2014
oligarch governor seeks aid to keep
donbass ukrainian so in this article
you're basically going to see him say
some shit like oh my god the
kremlin-funded militants
are calling moscow to step in and shake
charge and they're they're taking over
everything and western countries need to
react very quickly and give us aid we
need urgent economic and humanitarian
aid in the dawn bass or these militants
are going to take over so let me tell
you what's going on
a big broad picture is about to be
painted here
um this is also from
the carnegie institute and it's called
ukraine's kingdom of oligarch so a year
after the collapse of yanukovych's
government hope that the new ukraine can
check the power of the oligarchs and
install a new generation of reform minor
elites is shaky at best
right
so ukraine's government officials and
their backers in the west tend to focus
on russia's aggression this is from 2015
by the way right so it brought down
yanukovych it didn't diminish the role
oligarchs play in ukrainian politics or
to legitimize
fully the power of the central
government especially in the eyes of
oligarchs right
maidan was a tragedy again a tragedy
it's a tragedy the people were duped to
be an instrument of this oligarchic
inter-oligarchic squash squabbles right
between ukrainian oligarchs and russian
oligarchs
um
they were united against yanukovych step
by step funded key resistance groups and
that's a thing like me and jackson
focused a ton
on western
funding for the maidan
but
looking back we should have actually
focused a lot on the way these oligarchs
were funding
the maidan as well right
because
they'll
yanukovych's um grip on power directly
threaten their in their um interests
maidan was a people power movement
directed because yanukovych was getting
closer to russia and russia the
oligarchs as a class are declining and
losing power right again we have to
understand this within the frame of
class warfare
that's exactly what i intend i wrote an
article for cpi news that covered
kolominsky's ties it's on the cpi
website thank you so much chris morlock
appreciate you a ton man thank you so
much
it was none other than
dimitro for tosh who despite being under
house arrest in vienna reportedly forged
the deal that united the political
parties led by poroshenko and vitale
klitschko ahead of the may presidential
election
ukraine continues to be run by oligarchs
today yet the power dynamics between
oligarchic groups has shifted
dramatically most importantly the
overall influence of the traditional
power brokers with control over
ukraine's metallurgical and coal assets
is waning
having lost
point eight billion dollars of his net
worth in 2014
renee ahmet of ukraine's richest man
before the war
appears to be the biggest loser
however he remains powerful and has
ability to broker relationships between
kiev and donbass
where he still controls assets
he has ties with this guy the
self-proclaimed leader of the donetsk
people's republic
and he's widely believed to be working
with forces on both sides of the
ceasefire line
his energy business however has come
under pressure from fellow oligarch
ighor kolomowski who until recently was
believed to be the biggest winner of the
post-maidan era in terms of political
influence
the war in the don best has led to a
rise of patriotism across the country
the population in southeastern ukraine
continues to harbor pro-russian
sympathies of course that does not mean
many residents of the region actually
want to be ruled by moscow this is uh
whatever
their attitudes are this is in 2015.
archive in eastern city remains
vulnerable to separatist-led violence
blah blah blah
okay
so
this is this kind of broad picture
of the maidan actually increasing the
power of the oligarchs
to heights that have never been seen
before right
is the basic broad picture we're rolling
with here right
the question is what is the significance
actually
of this revolution in novorossiya of the
proclamation of the donetsk people's
republics bohansk people's republics and
now with ukraine's special operation the
wider sentiment within russia and the
way the winds are turning within russia
because of the war
what you have going on
is a situation
in which these people who are a bad
investment left behind and kept purely
on a lifeline
by these oligarchs and by this
oligarchic economy and by both to a
certain extent the ukrainian and russian
governments respectively
are now taking up arms
and establishing forms of political
power which remember
forms out of the barrel of a gun
and remember it's political power in
chechnya and in elsewhere that got put
into power in the first place that is
coming at the expense
of the power of the oligarchs whose rule
mind you is not simply as as it is with
capitalists based on their ownership of
certain types of property
but is based on their ownership
and their capture of the state right
so with guns
people in the dawn bass
are finally rising to the occasion of
defending themselves as a people not
only are people
worth investing in as far as economic
measures are concerned as far as the
economic policy is concerned
but as the ends
of
regional statehood of both russian
statehood and
well not ukrainian state to it anymore
but of the
state new russian state that's going to
emerge which emerges nova russia
so you have to understand the immense
social revolution
that is now at hand these people did not
have the revolutionary aspirations of
the western ukrainians the western
ukrainians were sick of the situation
they just started rioting and went to
the streets and destroying things
people in eastern ukraine no matter how
fucked over they were didn't have a
revolution like that
uh
where they're going on rioting on the
streets and and whatever to cause change
they're defending the ability
to maintain the status quo just like in
the iranian revolution that's why i'm
calling it a heidegarian revolution it's
just that the status quo
isn't what you think it is the status
quo is the essence
let's just say the da sign of soviet
civilization
just like in the chinese revolution with
the chinese peasants
you can have the chinese civilization
but don't assume you know what that
looks like it doesn't necessarily entail
agrarian backwardness
and all the rest of that
this revolution that the people in
eastern ukraine are fighting is a
hydarian revolution it's not a
revolution to go out on the street and
implement change
it's a revolution to defend what they
have
and what is under dispute is precisely
what they have and this is precisely
what does undermine the power of the
oligarchs because now
what is being brought to the forefront
is the existence of the russian peoples
and the former soviet peoples at large
if you will but specifically
the russian peoples of russia as a
civilization right
whether or not the ends and aims of
this polarity and this mode of
production
will be about them
them
their way of life
their culture
their inheritance of the soviet union
their wealth and their living being
the economic consequences of this
we haven't even seen as far as the
system that's now in place we can expect
nationalizations to be possible
the oligarchs to have their power
completely undermined
a true revolution for the reinvestment
into the peoples of russia i mean
you want to talk about a democratic
revolution these were regions that were
ruled by oligarchs
the donetsk people's republic and the
lugonx people's republic
chose leaders based on elections based
on what the people wanted
what we're witnessing
is a kind of bourgeois democratic
revolution and that's an outdated
archaic term but it's an authentic
democratic revolution it's like a
revolution
like 1776
was a revolution
where they're breaking up the grip on
political power that the oligarchs have
in order so that the state cannot be
used as an arm
of financial monopoly oligarchic
capitalists this is unprecedented
fertile soil
for an up and coming petty bourgeoisie
to be able to have its chance in the sun
a new era for the russian people a new
era for a russian economy
a genuine and authentic democratic
revolution
it's a democratic revolution it's a
progressive democratic revolution
that's really the crux of what we're
talking about here a progressive
democratic
revolution
that's the story people have been
missing here
soviet democracy was destroyed
by an oligarchic regime
from a materialist perspective
this democratic revolution its
implications are open-ended
i mean it's not even clear whether putin
is going to survive them the russian
people have been awakened to such an
extent
you can't put that back in the box
they are no longer accepting
the necrosis
and the decay
of their soviet past
they want to rise to the occasion of
acknowledging their sphere
their polarity
as something worth not only fighting for
with arms but worth establishing for as
the ultimate ends of a political economy
the russian sphere the russian world is
vlast
this civilization
is now something that's going to be
worth investing in
it's going to be something worth
investing in because people are
investing now
with something more worth more than all
the money in the fucking world and
that's their own blood
you don't think that's the epoch
defining thing
that define that even comes before
capital it does
capitalism emerged from the context of
war from the english civil war to the 30
days war
the ability for the sovereign to
exercise
their power
through blood
is the definitive context that laid the
groundwork for modernity
except in this case we don't have the
abstract sovereign leviathan of
modernity
we have
the vlast
and the polarity
of the russian world
asserting itself
and paying for that in blood
through war
through arms
through life itself
are we looking at the revival of the
soviet union no
we're looking at
something that even goes beyond the
soviet union we're looking at an
awakening
which i still believe the communist
party of the russian federation is best
equipped to provide the necessary
leadership for
the maidan was a false revolution it was
a false
overthrow of the oligarchs
this is the real revolution that's now
happening
you know about all the talk of
nationalizing assets and completely
changing the economy if you want to know
how drastic the changes are
you just have to consult
the changes in symbolism that are being
discussed i mean look at this
the communist party of the russian
federation is seriously proposing
through a bill it's submitting to the
state duma
to establish the flag of the ussr
as the official flag of russia
they are the ones spearheading this
and leading the way and why is that
because they
represent
from the very beginning the independence
movements of the donbass from the very
beginning supporting
crimea's joining an ascension to joining
the russian federation
communist party of the russian
federation from the very beginning
spearheading and representing the former
soviet peoples and the russian peoples
left behind
that's where it draws its material
bedrock of support from them
i don't know how else to cut it to you
guys if you're not already convinced
russia's returning to greatness
from a materialist perspective russia is
returning to greatness
russia is becoming a great power
again
and it's not just because of its special
operation in ukraine
it's because there's a social revolution
going on in russia
there's a class
struggle and social revolution going on
in russia
that is dethroning the power of the
oligarchic class
and what's next for this is an open
question it's an open book
the
the
enslavement
and the sale of russia and its wealth to
international financial capitalism is
over russia is now going to draw its
wealth
through a the strength and power of its
own people
and b
this is what i didn't get a lot of time
to talk about yet
further economic integration
china
needless to say
if you want to just run down in tldr of
this whole situation and what's been
going on here
russia's back
from a materialist perspective
understanding the causes
these events this is a
democratic
civilizational
revolution doesn't represent
the interest of some private class
it represents the interests
of the peoples of the former soviet
union out of the russian polarity
itself
all right ladies and gentlemen that
concludes the news segment
of today's stream however i am willing
to take in pollens and people who want
to debate um
if anyone wants to debate anything
uh
you know
willing to take in some collins now
and we need hostiles i don't have it in
me to have like a discussion or a
cordial conversation so i'm really
talking about debates
going once
owen twice
all right guys well to conclude things a
little bit
you know today was a really nice stream
it was actually a lot of work on my part
uh very exhausting but
appreciate so much of the donations also
especially from voidburn thank you so
much man
for those um
thank you so much for the donations guys
um
[Music]
appreciate it don't so much is the guy
in the show is not a liberal he's not a
liberal
he's not a liberal serpent sushi is not
a liberal
so no
oh oh hold on
super chats we have a few more
we do have a few more super chats
thank you morgan 100 correct us
euromaidan was by definition not a
revolution and merely a coup nothing
fundamentally changed apart from
reshuffling of individual oligarchs and
nato allegiance critical points thank
you so much
liberals think putin is fascist now wait
until russia gets a communist president
true
okay he is a liberal okay i'll have him
on well he's he's an elite benefactor
guys so this is not going to be meat for
the gorillas this is going to be a
okay you're now okay let's see
hello
hello can you hear me yes
all right sorry i i had the stream on
first i just had to get that muted i
think everything's all set on my m
good
so um i guess what people would like me
to discuss is in the discord i've been
kind of an advocate for liberal hegemony
and the um pushback against populist and
communistic movements i i imagine that
that's very counter to your position but
i just wanted to engage with you on that
i have a good time i have a good faith
question though
absolutely absolutely
so you say you're against populist
movements and stuff i'm not trying to
corner you here but i do see you are an
elite benefactor which means
and you you donate a lot of money to me
a month so you're you're contributing to
a
just don't want to deceive you of a very
illiberal cause so what is the reason
for that
yeah so i mean i i very much like the
community i like participating in it i
like debate and also i mean part of it's
egotistical i like having the orange
name as opposed to a yellow and discord
i'll be honest there but uh i don't know
i think you're much more intelligent
than people give you credit for even if
i do disagree with you and i think i
like seeing your content so i don't mind
contributing oh yeah i was just curious
but yeah that's perfectly legitimate all
right so uh what what exactly did so you
want to debate principally about this
issue of liberal hegemony
would say so i think that that is
perhaps where i could best represent my
views
and without um putting you in a box just
very vaguely what what do you mean by
liberal hegemony specifically
of course so i would say that liberal
hegemony
represents the collective interests of
western liberal democracies uh this
could be universal but right now we
mostly see it in western areas um and
the promotion of free markets of capital
relations however i'm not explicitly
pro-capitalist i think we are
over-represented through capital and we
need a strong proletarian political
movement so that's also part of why i
support you is i think through what
infrared is doing they can build more
proletarian power i just disagree on the
nature of revolution and communist rule
all right so
what i guess what i'm trying to get at
is why the western liberal democracy
absolutely so i feel that western
liberal democracy represents kind of the
ideal within a hegelian dialectic of
contradiction between the two classes
and rather than taking the marxist or
communist perspective of sublimating a
class i think that contradiction is
actually healthy for the development of
society and progressive in that capacity
i i i kind of it's hard for me to see
your perspective because
within liberal democracies there's
obviously no clear there's no
acknowledgement of classes in any
capacity whether in a formal you know
institutional capacity or in a kind of
capacity of like corporates right i know
there is a specific
uh fascist not to smear anything there
is a kind of giovanta sorry uh giovanni
gentile interpretation
of actually fascism is fitting that
description that you know from a
hegelian perspective the ability to
mediate the different interests of
various different classes through
corporates
represents the realization of the alien
absolute idea right
so sure
it's it's just hard for me to see how
that's true in liberal democracy though
where you have this kind of blank kind
of
see
hegel was very critical of of um
democracy and liberal democracy he was
writing screeds against the english
reform bill that precisely he didn't
like this idea of like a universal state
that indiscriminately rep
represents everyone's rights in the form
of direct kind of elections and we're
all equal before the law and for hegel
that that's that's a state that's not
sensitive enough to the contradictions
you're talking about so
why do you i mean um from how do liberal
democracies
sustain class struggle
rather than just be an accelerant for
the class struggle to lead to a
political antagonism because i mean in
liberal democracy it's very clear that
you you usually have these kind of
polarizations that lead to
you know you have these polarizations
not only in the form of politics but
wealth inequality that leads to a lot of
actual you know social unrest and stuff
so how does liberal democracy
prevent class struggle
so i i think that liberal democracy
doesn't prevent class struggle it
facilitates class struggle and i'm like
more of a pr part of me i'm more of a
proponent of
the
advocacy of working class like relative
power compared to the bourgeoisie and
that could be through unionizing efforts
that could be through political bodies
but it needs to be a conscious effort to
represent workers in order to counter
this uh capitalist hegemony that we find
ourselves yeah but you understand that
that's more of a kind of like
that's not really liberal democracy per
se maybe that's kind of like a social
democratic view
or a kind of more corporatist view
third position kind of you don't see the
contradiction between liberal democracy
and maybe social democracy i think that
social democracy is a more proletarian
form of liberal democracy
yeah i mean but the issue you run into
there is that we did have kind of social
democratic states in the 20th century
um
but they weren't they didn't survive so
i mean what were the reasons for those
states not being able to
persist
yeah well i think um there's a lot of
reasons i i'm not sure if i could like i
might be going too broad so is there a
specific like case like would you want
to talk about germany or why i think
there's like a broad understanding and
you can contradict this if you disagree
with it but i think there's a broad
understanding that what actually
happened was
you know with the
um end of the soviet well not just that
but with the kind of left the 73 crisis
and the newfound economic crisis and
also newfound populistic dissatisfaction
with status quo i mean all this form
together into kind of like a backlash
against
welfare state and social democracy
at that reagan revolution in america yes
and then with the fall of the soviet
union the last incentive
that actually maintain the social
democratic order which was this kind of
ability to be in between the united
states and the soviet union was gone
because the soviet union
collapsed so
the fear that workers were going to turn
to communism was the leverage that they
had
the only leverage that sustained social
democracy in my view was the threat of
a worker's
uprising or
some kind of threat by the working class
and
that was gone after the soviet union so
i just struggled to see how i mean
ideally
it's nice to be able to avoid all of the
instability that comes with like a
communist revolution and all that stuff
but
i don't see how social democracy can
avoid that instability itself
well again i i think that social
democracy is too oriented towards the
proletariat like i think the united
states like what i want to see happen
like i can give you like my proposal of
what i would like to see happen at least
in the united states because that's
where i am is i would like to see this
realignment within the republican party
that i see forming where regional and
proletarian power is more represented
than the democrats who have chosen
urbane and finance capital to be their
base of political representation so i
think advocating for that republican
shift will help counterbalance what we
have as an overly parasitic financial
class that currently operates in the
united states like i think that was much
of the reason for de-industrialization
was like you were saying there wasn't
this strong proletarian power i agree
that communistic states provided that
strength but they are fundamentally in
my view unstable and un uh not
undemocratic but um repressive in their
nature and i i don't support them and i
also don't believe that they
sufficiently increase productive forces
for developing societies
sure i mean so it vaguely sounds like
you kind of want to take on the
establishment and take on the ruling
class that exists now and you may have
an ideal of a future
in which you know capitalists in some
capacity but you are against the
existing class correct
yes but like let's say if i were in
china i would be much more advocating
for the liberalization and increase of
capitalist power in china due to their
overemphasis of proletarian power
well i mean that's just the kind of
hypothetical speaking now right sure
it's kind of bizarre that you then say
though that you want to help
liberal democratic hegemony
when this hegemony is actually an arm of
this very same ruling class that you're
claiming you want to take on with the
republican
talking law so i kind of see a
contradiction i mean how can you retain
that hegemony
when the only reason that hegemony
expresses itself is to serve the
interests of that class
i think i would disagree about it
serving specifically the interests of
that class in my view it's it does serve
the interests of capital like i won't
deny that but in doing so it provides a
mutual benefit for workers by increasing
their standard of living and their
expectations of what they can consume
within a market economy and even for
developing nations it provides the
capital necessary to begin to
industrialize and develop their economy
so that they too can become a more
developed society
right that sounds good ideally but
that's not actually what happened i mean
the u.s foreign policy for example to
maintain liberal democratic hegemony has
not resulted in any
benefit
you know the people um as far as
industrialization of other countries i
mean that's even an even worse case
because
those countries are de-industrialized
because of our policies in relation to
them so i mean i disagree with the
notion that we haven't seen under
liberal democracies a significant
increase in say like a human development
index or gross national income per
capita or mean years of schooling i
think these indices are very important
measures for seeing the quality of life
of individuals and they have increased
from 1980 to 2011 at least according to
the data that i'm uh looking at i could
send it to you if you'd like but i'm not
sure if that would derail the
conversation yeah i i don't i don't
doubt that but a lot of that has to do
there are indexes that do show from 1980
2011 there's been some
movement in the standard living of the
but i mean there's two things here right
a lot of that is just the inevitable
result
of technology increasing which calls
into question
how much how much of missed
opportunities are there like relative to
the level of growth before then things
have kind of flattened out right when
they don't necessarily have to and then
second i don't feel that they flattened
out i feel that we're seeing an
acceleration if anything the flattening
out is partially due to this uh
narrative of environmentalism that we
need to be maintaining and that is uh
like this de-growth narrative that's uh
present in like certain yeah but
the rate of growth as far as the
expansion of western economies is
by no means has retained any from world
war ii
1980
1980 to 2011 the former vastly was a
much higher rate of growth right
so that's what i'm talking about there
and second of all yes
um
the other problem i have
here is that when it comes to concrete
measures taken to defend liberal
hegemony
what i'm saying is that that doesn't
lead to an any type of benefit i mean
even if people have benefited under
liberal democracy right the concrete
measures taken to defend liberal
democracy like
edo expansion or wars in the middle east
or any of that other kind of stuff
people don't see any material benefit
from
so i would say that within nato we have
seen a
a demilitarization of some of the most
violent societies that we have seen in
the past hundred years and a cooperation
that's unprecedented in that regard what
i mean uh what society is in question
sure france germany the united states
i i feel that nato is uh i mean it's a
product of that world war ii you know
it's a product of what happened
afterwards no um nato was a product of
the cold war world war ii
um
did not produce nato well maybe world
war ii produced the european union i
could see a case for that
the concrete economic case
nato was an alliance that was formed to
basically destroy the soviet union
yeah i would say that that's more
accurate i'm willing to accept that yeah
um
so that i mean that's just really more
over what i'm talking about here it's
like
i
i also don't know
specifically why um
one of the issues i have with this
ideology of social democracy and i
really don't like getting in the
nitty-gritty of ideologies but it's like
if you have enough leverage political
leverage to be able to like
implement your goal why not take it a
step farther and just go full communism
because
if you have the leverage to do it you
have the freedom to do right the only
reason we don't we can't go full
communism or whatever
uh depending on how you interpret that
right which is like you know
a complete social revolution and
revolution in the forces of production
whatever it's like it's because we don't
necessarily always have the leverage
especially now so i mean i could be open
to seeing like a communistic like form
it's just whenever we understand um like
the united states or western societies i
mean the people living now
the part of the issue i feel with marx's
analysis was he felt that london or not
that london rather that germany was
going to be one of the centers for this
revolution but what he didn't take into
account in my view or maybe he did but i
feel like uh this was ignored perhaps by
others was that the revolutions occurred
in areas of the least amount of
development and the highest amounts of
stress so marx uh
yeah marx
he um initially actually thought england
it's even written in the communist
manifesto england was going to be the
first
um
and later in their lives they said no
germany but then later in their lives
they said no russia right so there's
this gradual shift where they're kind of
um
rethinking their original premises and
what marx and eagles never did was
arrive at a kind of like
theory of why that was
sure that's something that
that's something that lenin would would
kind of add to marxism which is why it's
called marxism feminism
yes yes um so like just as a point of
like uh i guess clarification i mean you
said earlier that i'm not a liberal and
i mean at a point that was true i used
to be a marxist londonist but i've since
reframed my understanding as i feel that
that project doesn't have a strong
material base for its reproduction and
when we've seen these societies develop
they've been out competed and out
stomped by these liberal democracies and
whether or not that's moral or justified
is necessarily the concern it's been the
reality that they just have supreme
productive and military power
that that's a true description for the
soviet um led eastern bloc and the
soviet union itself but you do have to
admit it's not true for china right
china
is not out competed by liberal i mean
china blew liberal democracies that were
starting from a similar place that it
was economically out of the water in
terms of it it's even blowing the us out
of the water
for that to even begin
right
it took until dengs reforms for that to
begin
yeah i know but china's still a
communist state it still took the
national industrial system built by mao
for granted
which deng had to take for granted in
order to industrialize the country i
mean it took the political system from
taking the rule of the party still and
its ability to kind of see the economy
as like something that it controls and
it plans for or the it doesn't plan for
it in the same way as before
but yes well it actually it still plans
for it but
it just it doesn't use the same
instruments it did before
in this planning right it doesn't use
the same
organs of planning but it still
lands the economy right
so and i think that that planning of the
economy is a big part of why we're
seeing issues around china say like
population having problems i know you
were talking to someone earlier about
this issue which i do think is more
important than you give it credit for
but in addition i think that china
demonstrates
that when you liberalize even from a
socialistic position you have this
explosion of growth and i think rather
than saying that this is evidence of the
communist project working i'd say it's
evidence of the weakness of communism
and the strength of liberalism even when
it's being subdued by a communist state
i i disagree with that because i
wouldn't actually really characterize
china's economy as having been liberal
um
while there wasn't opening up i don't
think that's the same thing as
liberalism i think
actually i think um with
whatever degrees of more freedom and
autonomy
for chinese markets that were opened up
there was also a huge increase in the
amount of control
the government exercised over them so
the same amount of
let's call it liberalization also
corresponded to a proportionate amount
of control
by the government right
so it's kind of like a not a one-sided
thing out of control due to an increase
in technological capacity and
statistical analysis
not necessarily due to the communist
regime
well
um no i don't even think that's true i
think at the level of the extent to
which china really intervenes and
regulates its economy even before the
widespread adoption of computer
technology
um the government had just more control
i mean the ability to so trade with the
west for example is something you would
call liberalization but if this trade
with the west is like
it's just leading to more control by the
party it's it allows the party to
control more things
than it did previously right
um how do you mean
like for example um
the extent foreign investment was
allowed in china but it was only allowed
in a way that was controlled
and beneficial for the project of china
yeah but it was still controlled by the
party right and then um you know uh
there was an extent of markets that were
opened up in china and so on
but only in a way again that was
directed and controlled
by the party so it's it's kind of like a
dual thing it's it's not a once i feel
that that control weakened what we could
have seen as possible growth
that's where i really disagree because i
think in in russia i think russia did
adopt that view where it's like
we're not going to have
the control at all we're going to have
just pure
liberalization but what kind of
dialectics teaches us is that
you
when you are one-sided you end up at its
opposite so
when russia fully liberalized formally
the concrete material result was
actually no change at all it's just
retained that old soviet economy
uh just now privatized with no actual
expansion and growth you you need to
have a kind of dialectic
where you don't have full liberalization
but you take into account
um yeah no
clarification like i'm not a laissez
faire like type no i i understand but
it's like i don't it's not necessarily
true that um
you know
just because china received a certain
extent of growth
uh after the reform and opening up oh
that's just a shadow of what it could
have experienced if it fully opened up
but i think that doesn't take into
account the fact that control isn't just
an impediment
to the forces of production it's a
crucial part of the forces of production
ability to develop in the first place
so why do you feel that there's a direct
connection between control of a singular
party and the increase in efficiency of
productive forces development because
for the productive forces to develop
they have to develop in a directed way
they will not spontaneously
lead to a desired result they have to be
directed because capitalists think in
the short term
whereas a political party thinks in the
long term right so capitalism strictly
think in the short term
even the even like blackrock
the the highest
extent of like capitalist financial
abstraction where
they're going to think about long-term
investments they can only make
investments ultimately based on
precedent when it comes to risky gambles
that are based on like ephemeral ideals
like the well-being of the people good
of the people nation or civilization
that's something that requires political
will
no i i would agree like when it comes to
building like uh large infrastructure
projects or like energy uh like plants
like nuclear power something i very much
advocate for i think these types of
industries very much need government
control and intervention but to me it
should be negotiated through a process
of parliamentary or democratic um
dialectical discussion rather than being
dominated by the uh control of a
democratically centralized party well
dialectical discussion forms the bedrock
of communist parties decision-making
process
um parliamentary statehood all that does
is create artificial barriers
in the kind of organization of the state
and artificial differences that don't
necessarily have to be like with maui's
terms
primary contradictions right i mean like
within the party there's a lot of
differences but everyone recognize hey
we're on the same page we all want the
same thing which is
want what's best for the chinese people
whereas political parties kind of create
these barriers where they say
even if you know it's not about being on
the same page as far as what we want we
have fundamental ideological
disagreements and political
disagreements i'm sorry i'm sorry i had
to change uh the sound output what was
the last minute um
my apologies yeah
a multi-party system is kind of like
defined by like
definite political and ideological
differences
which i don't think lends itself well to
having a unified state i think
you can have differences in
disagreements but if you're on the same
page about
what the state should do and all and
like in a very general sense i don't
think there's a need for different
parties
yeah i think though that the different
parties are able to especially when you
have like i think the us is too limited
and it's two-party dynamic but when you
have the ability to form coalitions and
negotiate among them these different
interest groups can be represented in a
far more impactful way than in say a
communistic or a marxist londoners
society where you have a strict doctrine
that party members have to follow and
then internal debate within that
doctrine i think that that doctrine of
centralization um
land uh collective ownership by the
state and these other things are highly
limiting and to one's own individual
liberty but also one's ability to
develop and prosper
all right well in china there are a
whole host of interests that do get
ultimately represent i think better than
they do in the west actually because
it's serving that specific goal i don't
i don't think there has to be a need
to give formal expression to antagonism
i think if antagonisms are authentic
they can express themselves within
single forms right and that's what
happens successfully within china is
that all sectors of society get
representation through distinct groups
it's just that you don't have this war
with society has with itself
in the form of like this civil war i
mean
and also
what you said about limiting prosperity
man i just don't see that being true in
china's case because
again china's experience like an
unprecedented level of growth and
prosperity
um
compare china has had large
leaps and strides in terms of its
development and growth but when it comes
to its um like what i view as a highly
important figure the gross national
income per capita it's about the same as
thailand still and even though there's
this massive productive basis massive
population you don't really see the you
know you said this
was that the gross
gross national income per capita oh per
capita i i don't
yeah i just i don't think that's um
that doesn't really speak to like
the direction of where china is going it
doesn't really speak to the context it
doesn't speak to the potential
i don't really think it's a very
reliable
um
metric as far as understanding a macro
economy just kind of taken out of
context yeah i think why i like
emphasize this um
in like uh per capita figure is because
when it comes to
developing like productive forces part
of what you need is the human capital of
having a very educated populist a
populist that has money to invest in the
market yeah
well i think that's a non-factor
not not what the things you talked about
but the gross capital because it's
taking a snapshot of something that's
constantly undergoing and there is a
rising chinese middle class and there is
a rising consumer chinese class they're
very educated as well so those are non
issues right i mean
um
but gross capital isn't going to really
represent everything because it it
doesn't take institutions into it right
in
the extent to which those have decisive
significance
yes but when we see like china's like
gdp development a lot of it's going into
and this is part of why it's investing
into the belt and road so hard is
because so much of its production went
into construction and uh like building
up of housing and a big problem there is
that while some of these houses were
eventually filled in a lot of this
development was redundant
and not actually contributing towards
the development of an economy
sorry you're saying that they built too
many houses
i'm saying that the infrastructure that
they built didn't have the economy to
match it and that the issue there no
that's the kind of that's like the myth
of the uh chinese ghost cities and the
basic problem with that
myth is that these ghost cities you see
do actually become eventually populated
it just takes a few years and
people go with cameras and say oh
they're all ghost cities but
again it's taken out of context
sure no i and i understand that but i
don't think that that's necessarily the
unified case i think that there are some
cities that have developed in that way
and i can understand china taking that
policy but more of what i'm talking
about is like where we see these uh
large road like developments uh these
investments in buildings that are
somewhat shoddy in their development due
to poor quality materials and that this
produces an inflated sense of gdp that
isn't really representative of the
prosperity of the people which i guess
is something i value more than the
prosperity of society because i see them
as interrelated
um
i disagree because
it's about a disagreement about what
fundamentally drives an economy and the
things you're talking about are
investments in
in the chinese people okay
and
for china
those types of investments which you
don't make an immediate profit on
ultimately do lead to what is the
fundamental engine of economic growth
because these cities and this
infrastructure that it builds which
eventually becomes
populated in the long term
become sources for the ability
for businesses
to invest in
they become sources to cultivate human
capital from that they become sources to
have new i mentioned the consumer market
thing
yes so this is where i think communists
kind of have it uh reversed i i think
that they're focusing on developing this
infrastructure developing this uh
ability for people to live in a region
before the region has the incentives to
drive the people there to want people to
come so like when you have instances of
like eminent domain being used and
houses being built uh
torn down and people having to move
towards these new developed areas part
of the issue there is that their job
that they worked at is now like an hour
away
chinese people do have
an incentive to move to these places
because
you have if like um
a huge kind of urbanization push
that's a result of the material
growth of the chinese people's wealth
but what industry is compelling that
urbanization and growth
there's that's the beautiful thing about
china it's not like another country
where
there's one industry there is no one
industry
it's a whole multitude of industries
right yeah yeah but like what are
examples of those industries
from what i see is that
really china has like in order in order
to understand china you kind of have to
like
understand the circuit the circularity
of it
it's not the industry is itself
economic growth it's developing the
forces of production whether that's
infrastructure construction
um
mining or manufacturing i mean it's all
the things that develop the forces of
production which for china has become
the ends of a state itself
i think we differ on where we define
what um the mode of production and how
it's developed because to me my
understanding is that
what is a mode of production primarily
for capitalism was this uh and this is
coming from paul cockshot like a
communist he talks about there being
this uh steam-powered steam engine which
produces the capitalist mode and that
electrification and electricity is
fundamental to the communist mode in
some levels i can agree there i just
think that liberalism is much more
efficient at producing these uh sources
of power generation that can then be
used in industry whereas i don't think
that building houses building roads
necessarily produces that industrial
growth it's there for after
you're talking more about like the
underlying
source of energy for all these other
things
um i would say that that's like the
fundamental core because the the norm in
the well that's an interesting thing to
bring up because
the majority of the world has been
reliant on fossil fuels and oil
and china is actually leading the push
not only for like that solar bullshit
but
more interestingly fusion energy right
they're making these artificial suns
i think that's excellent
yeah i mean i so i i don't really
you know
i what i'm saying though is that
their infrastructure projects that are
largely inflating their gdp are not
reflective of those other projects i
think that china as a centralized state
has a really strong ability to mobilize
taxes and capital in order to fund these
uh electrification projects perhaps
maybe better than i think here's here's
the basic difference it's gonna boil
down to this right yeah for china
there's two things that are the prime
want of life work is life primes want
developing the forces of production
and people increasing the people's
livelihood and standard living for them
that is the only real engine of economic
growth it's not only the the ends of
economic growth
that's what drives economies to grow
i mean so when you invested
this like uh increase in the like
well-being or productivity of
individuals like to me that's where that
per capita statistic comes in but do you
have china china still
china has over a billion people it's
still developing right it's not finished
with its developments so i think that's
just
a snapshot of where it is at now rather
than
[Music]
where it's going to be in 30 years or so
i mean america had 200 years right
china's
i think they're doing very well for
how how
bad the
starting line was
yes and i and i do give credit to
the
when communists do by the way we gotta
wrap this up soon yeah wrap it up no
worries no worries
uh is there like a concluding point or
something that i should address or would
you like to kind of just end things
there because i feel like we've had a
good discussion yeah we can just end
things right no problem i hope you have
a good one
all right revolution we got to make this
quick and this is the last caller we're
taking in what's going on
it's it's going good um i just want to
debate about uh the cognitive cognitive
dissident
uh when it comes to like the
geopolitical
uh issues when it comes to identity
politics
and uh kind of the ideas between
um
i'm pretty sure you know how liberals
tend to group communism and fascism
together a lot
and usually you could just chalk it up
to an authoritarian
uh generalization of them but as i've
done a lot of research into both sides
because i i don't really identify as a
marxist lindenist or a fascist i i kind
of just been sitting on the fence
essentially but as i've done reading
into
tons of different uh works
uh on both sides i've noticed a lot of
things that kind of
can be interpreted
by people who identify as fascists and
people i identify as communists
where
they really do overlap in kind of a
a way that can make someone hold two
ideas that are basically
uh contradicting one another
and that's what makes it so hard for me
to to pick a side so so to speak
like uh like a big one is like both
bulkasoka i've read
uh the doctrine of fascism by mussolini
and that is basically the what is
considered to be
the communist manifesto of
self-proclaimed fascists and whatnot
so that's where i started first on my
research and as i read it i noticed a
lot of different
uh
you know basically semantics in it and
whatnot
that one could really
say is a lot more materialist than it is
idealist which most people agree
idealism is usually what uh
fascism usually entails
so
i mean historically speaking mussolini
was a marxist before he
basically invented fascism
so we could chalk it up to that but at
the same time
we group movements that are 100 percent
idealist like the national socialist
movement of germany in in the same group
and as i've sort of gone on like a
political journey i've noticed that a
lot of people
are
claimed to be fascists but reject nazism
and it's a really strange phenomenon to
me that if you if i explain to people
that they have a lot more in common with
marxist leninism for example than they
think it just completely baffles them
and i really have uh
i really don't have an exact stance on
why that is
it's more of a phenomenon than anything
um
i don't know if i agree with the
description of um
doctrine of fascism
i think
a lot of
the difference between uh
what happened in italy and germany can
kind of be chalked up
uh geopolitics
right that the situation germany
how it was
handled by uh
nazis
which had precursors and whereas italy
was not as significant
less stakes but
i guess the real question would be um
if a
if mussolini or
had the same mentality or let's just say
had the same material relationship
uh to class struggle
power in germany would they have acted
the same way
nazis i think probably would have
taking into consideration
um
germany's
geopolitical situation and all the
inheritance from
um
i think there is the reason people just
call them the same just fascism
it's not so much about ideology as it's
much about kind of this idea of
um
the former status quo
going into emergency mode and kind of
like
using extra liberal and extra democratic
power
to kind of maintain these zombie uh
yeah that's that's the biggest problem
though that arises about it is that uh
fascism has always been labeled as
reactionary when
mussolini and the doctrine of fascism is
explicitly
revolutionary by description and even
you know the march on roman what not
it's historically speaking is
revolutionary rather than reactionary
and mussolini definitely clashed heads
with a lot of
big oligarchs and business type figures
that tried to invest while on the
contrast
the
nazi germany and hitler and whatnot were
very
very uh
close with people like the rockefellers
yeah like charles lindbergh and like the
well because like that's the thing about
corporatism the thing is is that
corporatism
is um
is defined very vaguely like you you ask
someone what's corporatism and one
person will say oh it's state-controlled
industry right and another person will
say oh it's like a corporatocracy it's
like corporations run the government
it's complete opposites it's like do the
corporations run the government or do
the government run the corporations
well the thing with italy though is that
it didn't actually have a developed
industrial capitalist class so what
happened in italy was that
the main class that was in power was the
landowner class the landowners in the
countryside
owned the land
and what they would do is that they
would turn their land specifically in
southern italy as a speculative kind of
asset
which they would use as a form of
leverage
with which to give out loans for
industrial capitalists but there was not
a great extent of industrialization that
was their fruit of this arrangement but
the ruling class in italy the elite
families
kind of stuff
those came from the landowners that up
to the bankers and all those other
people right if industrial capitalists
we're not that enthused about mussolini
and the fascist and the later on at very
least or in the beginning i mean
i i've seen i've heard conflicting
things i've heard you know that that
were mixed
i've heard seen cases where they were
supporting the fascists especially in
the 20s they all got on board with
mussolini
uh very quickly
but when it came to the violence that
led up to the march on rome
although i i to be to be fair to great
to be granted to you i didn't see a lot
of evidence
that industrial capitalists were like
the main bedrock of support for the
fascists
it was mainly soldiers ex-soldiers and
whatnot it is well just let me finish it
was the landowners
the most acute violence was not
happening in rome in the cities
the most acute form of class struggle
where the black shirts were fighting the
most the countryside it was between the
landowners and the landowning club
and the landless
so that it's a very overlooked context
of what happened
but um
there was also the suppression of that
working-class movement in
in rome and in the urban context that
also there was a great extent of fascist
violence but most of the fascist
violence
was
on the behest of the landowning class
yeah um
so so basically what you're saying is
the the landowners were probably more
like the closest thing to the
proletariat you could get in italy at
that time since there wasn't much of an
industrial base no are you saying that
it was it was basically bourgeoisie um
no i think what actually happened was
that
the communists in italy were too
dogmatic
to recognize
that there was this bulwark in in
southern italy of these rural italian
kind of they weren't necessarily
peasants but they weren't they also
weren't
a you know a proletariat
urban proletariat and they didn't really
learn from what lenin did in russia and
apply that to italy because they're like
well italy is more advanced than russia
we don't have to have we don't have to
learn the lessons of the unity of the
workers and the peasants now later on
communists in italy would kind of draw a
cringe conclusion from workers and
peasants this idea of like
gramsci's hegemony like unite the urban
proletariat with the bourgeois
institutions
and that's how we accomplish
dualistic um
after power but
really what they should have been
looking at was the kind of rule movement
in
italy
which which wasn't addressed i don't
think by any political movement the
fascists weren't particularly popular
among them the communists weren't the
socialists weren't they were kind of my
extent to my investigations they were
kind of left behind
yeah
it is really that's that's really the
main thing that makes it so much of a
phenomenon the whole
like the origins of original fascism and
the way it just kind of conflicts with
things is it
it italy is definitely weird and that it
is a central european nation with a lot
of characteristics that are not normal
of you know
like because normally when we think of
central europe we think of germany we
think of like austria
when we think of italy it's really
they share more in common with
like the the balkan nations in terms of
their historical amount of
industrialization and whatnot and their
politics are really weird for that like
there was a schism
originally when mussolini formed like uh
the fascist combat whatever whatever he
formed originally i can't remember the
name it exactly well when he originally
formed the precursor to the fascist
party there was a schism in the
communist party with a group of uh
ex-communists just like him
that were
still still considered themselves
marxist then ended up joining him
and he created this
huge ordeal where it brought about
basically mussolini
repressing the communist party and
killing a few of their leaders when he
took power
yeah but
i i uh i don't know you kind of lost me
there what what year was that
i i think it was right after you took
power i think it was like uh
what 20 and what was the schism within
the communist party about
it it was about uh
whether or not they should follow
mussolini because the thing is there's a
lot of people that time were seeing
mussolini as possibly like
uh well you have to understand that if
there was a communist party
then it's taking its orders from the
common turn
right which linen linen actually
personally made a statement on mussolini
uh yeah he said that mussolini was um
that we lost mussolini he would have
been a good asset
yeah
so like
that i think that's a good question
the common turns position at that time
on
fascism
the reason communists were the first
kind of anti-fascist was because of the
experience
and they saw
you know what happened there as like a
big lesson
about this new phenomena that hadn't
taken
into account before but
the bolsheviks i was like these are like
the black hundreds right
yeah
which we've already had experience with
before
the problem is that in the modern
context uh
if you just hand your average a person
especially in in western society if you
hand your average person
the communist manifesto and then you
find another person of almost the same
like the the same mentality and hand
them the fascist the manifesto
essentially
really
it's gonna
form the same general
idea of anti-capitalism
but in weird twisted ways that are based
off the same material technically
because it's undeniable i think most
people interested in fascism today
tend to be young people
like or against the status quo
a lot of the ability for it to serve
that
goal
comes from how demonized
fascism is by the mainstream
so a lot of people then come to see
fascism as revolutionary because of that
um
the problem though is that
that's not a reflection accurately in my
view of fascism was a story
and i think a lot of the demonization of
fascism
today
okay
there you fucking happy with the fucking
game
yeah the problem is that historically
um
fascism doesn't historically represent
what it actually is today yeah and
that's what i mean yeah and it's like uh
i think the reason why it's demonized
today is because
basically of like uh i think it's the
it's it's this
emergence of a liberal democratic
ideology
after world war ii
where
fascism was unsust
fascism is always like a secret
arm
used by
the deep state and used by the status
quo around the world death squads and
all that kind of shit as of in ukraine
it's a good example
but the reason why they don't adopt it
you know unanimously here is because it
was just
it it's like the state of the class war
is not so easily
in that direction i do think we're kind
of close to that if you ask me
um
but you know
it's for a lot of complicated reasons
that have to do with like
first of all fascism is like a
determinate ideology and according to
the open society that's a no go i always
see fascism as kind of like a tentacle
of the octopus which is liberal
anglo-saxon liberalism
and the reason anglo-saxon liberalism
doesn't just become fascism
is because that would be like reducing
the octopus to the tentacle it destroyed
the whole thing it'd be an internal
contradiction it's unsustainable
so it's just my view i think i i see
fascism as
a type of
weapon of liberal order
but it's metaphysically liberal still
there's no independent in my view
independent fascist
my number one critique of fascism
will be summed up this way
there is no independent fascist
metaphysics
fascist metaphysics is just liberal
modern metaphysics nietzsche was the
poet of this obviously but it's just
liberal i mean
what i've noticed specifically in my
interaction with destiny's community and
then some
fascist communities before like a year
ago is they both have the same realism
they both
inhabit the same world they both have
the same
metaphysics it seems like you have to be
like an insane
marxist leninist like me
to actually believe in a different
metaphysics like i don't for example
uh i you know why i always say i'm a
lysenkowist
why
because
if you if someone's claiming they're a
true revolutionary and they're against
the established whatever i kind of want
to test you and say
but
how far will you go to call everything
into question will you retain the same
metaphysics as liberalism
with some edge or will you actually go
beyond that threshold
and that's kind of how i test it and a
lot of the times people who call
themselves fascists
they are still liberal realists they
still believe in the same world liberals
believe in
they are just more cynical and realistic
maybe about it but
they still believe in the same thing
like i also think
it's kind of like i think most liberals
believe in race science and uh
race and iq this is actually the most
beautiful example i can find i don't
want to ramble but you know liberals do
believe in
race science
liberals do believe there's such a thing
as iq that's determined by your genetics
and there's a behavioral genetics and
whatever every we're all
we're all determined by like whatever
some biological
darwinian view of things right
all fascists
do is then say okay
we're just gonna take that same premise
and take it to its conclusion and then
the liberal goes oh no no that's immoral
but the fascist says okay who cares if
it's immoral
is it true or not and the liberal is
like well
they can only find recourse into
morality they don't they but they share
the same metaphysics they share the same
underlying
realist view of the world
it's just that
liberals kind of soften
the edge and the
um
kind of bad implications
that has for our humanity with morality
it's kind of like when liberals say shit
like oh yeah we can be transhumanists
and we're able to upload our brains into
computers but we shouldn't because it's
immoral or we shouldn't develop a human
like ai because it's immoral and then
you have to take this ridiculous yeah
and then you have the first place you
have like the nick land edge lord who's
like no let's just do it fuck morality
and then you have a marxist leninist
like me who's like wait a second
you can't do that because it's literally
not possible
like
so
to me i think that's my biggest critique
of fascism and and basically the right
in generals i don't think they ever
arrive at a point
where
they
they um believe in a different world
than liberals it's still this
metaphysically speaking i mean it's like
still the same one it's just
uh
taken to its
extreme conclusion
so do you do you believe so i i know
everyone uses the left and right
terminology but do you believe truly
that there is like a definitive left and
right because i i think the the
horseshoe theory is a little more
accurate today than it was before
since if you were to ask like i said
before if you're after the average
person
chances are they wouldn't understand the
semantics of fascism and communism
they're equally anti-capitalist they
they might accept one of those my my
view is i don't give any essentiality to
left and right but i do think these
distinctions uh
somehow do arise i just
i think my controversial view basically
is um
i think there's a left and right
within
a party within an institution within a
state maybe right
right i don't think there's a general
universal left and right
i don't think it's a universal right so
i just think it's relative and i i don't
think it's it's essential like
let's say there's a um
a war between
syria and america or something right
and right-wing forces are in power in
syria it's like who gives a fuck right
that's internal to syria
so i think geopolitics really does
displace that i think things like that
kind of
displace that in a more fundamental view
than
the political no political spectrum is
unconditional right so it's like
you know um it's not about being left or
right even though that distinction i
think is inevitable i don't think that's
what it's about
yeah i i definitely do agree with you on
the fact that it really does seem like
there is no really universal left and
right as much as there is because the
the funny thing is the alliances we see
that are supposed to be ideologically in
history are are usually more
geopolitics than they are
ideological alliances
and instead the way i i think it
actually truly might be is that within
certain ideologies there is a left right
and center that you could kind of
identify in each one like the nazi party
for example in germany literally had
their own
schism and the night of the long knives
was it was like a three-part thing where
the black front formed which was the
left the left the far left form of the
uh the national socialist party led by
otto strasser and whatnot and then there
was that center
that was more so of uh they weren't as
radical as strasser in the black front
and all these other people
but yeah they they were more they were
basically communists that got well i
think a lot of that had to do with we're
gonna have to wrap this up but um all
right it's getting really late but uh
i think that had more to do
with
not
them being communist where i think it
was like those represented more of kind
of like the lumpen and more criminal
elements
of the essay and the the nazi party and
hitler kind of wanted to go mainstream
yeah i was using that more of just a
broad example because you could see that
in all sorts of types of parties like
even the republican party in the united
states has its populist wing that is
more left-wing and then i think that's a
completely um different case which it's
a very important uh
thing to talk about it's just we don't
have any time but yeah thank you thank
you for coming on and
thank you for having me on yeah no
problem all right guys that's it for
call-ins for today we're gonna have to
limit those next time so we can have
more but we do have some more super
chats
so thank you grimes the replacement of
the russian flag with the ussr flag is
far more than legislation it is
basically an example of the culmination
of the revolt against legacy of the
great enslaver that was yeltsin
can i get unbanned from the discord i
don't know why you were banned
based thank you morlock cockshot maps
energy types to production modes it's a
k-wave-based analysis hydro equals
feudal steam equals capital electricity
equals socialism info equals
thank you morlock and
in i don't think information is a uh
a production mode all of those other
production modes you mentioned were
very much grounded in physics
revolutions in physics
but
can i say something guys
paul if you're a fan of paul coxshot you
must agree with my thesis
that we already live in socialism
because cockshot's right electricity is
inherently socialist
look around us
we live in an electrified world
socialism has clearly prevailed
so even you dogmatic whatever marxoids
you have to come around and
acknowledge it to some extent right
um
you know what that is so intelligent by
cockshot
now that i think about it
because the identification of steam
and specifically turbine power with
capital
i think more so than steam is turbine
right turbine power because steam can be
replaced with coal
steam can be replaced with other shit
but
even electric energy everything comes
from turbine turbines generate
so the turbine is the capital right
turbines generate electricity
and
the way electricity works yes it is
it is yeah it is to socialism with the
turbine is
oh it is steam power
yeah it actually is yeah it's it's it
it's what powers the turbine you're
right
you're actually
right you're actually right about that
a history of power is finding new ways
to spin wheels using water
that's so true a lot of people don't
know that we still use turbines for
power
you guys know how people are like oh
yeah hydro and and um you know we have a
dam and we have a nuclear plant
all of those things are used to
the way we get energy is the same it's
through fucking spinning a wheel we
still do get it from spinning a wheel
and the only other one is air
yeah even nuclear's turbine
everything's turbine
so turbine is kind of a stand-in for
capital i think
with capital becomes an epicycle in
socialism it doesn't just disappear it
just becomes an epicycle of the
production process and no longer becomes
an ends in and of itself
but uh
i am trying to think
[Music]
i'm so tired
i'm still trying to think um
what's next
what comes after electricity
you say information
all of that is still coming from that
fucking turbine
okay
there has to be a revolution in physics
only a revolution in physics
uh
yeah i heard gonzalo lira's alive and
well i'm glad to hear it
i kind of like this guys because like
i'm not under pressure to like entertain
you right now i could just chill just
like give me a moment guys to like
feel like how i was on twitch before all
of the viewers leave
uh
remember how on twitch i could just sit
here and do this
and people wouldn't
remember
remember the good old days
i wish i could just sit here and chill
with you guys i wish i could just sit
here chill with you guys
talk about whatever i want
and i am gonna do that
when i get to like a thousand peak
viewers
i'm gonna have chill streams with just
like 500 people
right
but
yeah
yeah i already lost 50 viewers going
silent
yeah like i said youtube viewership is
not loyal they're not loyal
because it's not this is why because
it's not based on personality
it's based on content only
um that's kind of something sad you know
on twitch it was parasocial
can i tell you guys something
twitch
i'm sad man fuck it i gotta i had to
grow out of that twitch shit i'm not
gonna lie that shit was like
it's like i never grew up on it's like i
was going back to childhood on twitch
you know
some
because i'll tell you why
which
so you guys want to know the truth
no you're not going to get more quality
view i don't know thank you chris
cockshot's video is called modes of
production on his channel worth a look
thank you so much chris morlock
um
i'm gonna tell you guys the truth
twitch's parasociality
it wasn't just for you it was also for
me
because i just like to chill i like to
go live and be with my chat
and be with my people and be with my
community
and
you know
and all that shit is gone
remember when we played minecraft
remember when we played minecraft
remember our minecraft server remember
all that shit we did together remember
us
remember our community
they took it away because of ukraine
amber gta
oh cause of
ukraine
insane for ukraine
insane
they took it all took it away because
ukraine
yeah youtube's way less parasocial way
less
but
i was running away from our true task
because
i was running away
i gotta grow here
i gotta get a serious audience
gotta reach serious viewers
but i'm gonna miss those days
i don't i see your super chat
based
remember when you had the babushka fight
the pack of lions
no i don't i'm trying to think about
what the fuck you're talking about i
don't remember that
what is that
i don't it kind of sounds oh gary's mod
yes
damn all right guys i'll see you
tomorrow
see you tomorrow guys bye