US IRAN INVASION BEINGS | HEATED DEBATES!

What is up, Drama Nation?

We've got a lot to talk about today.

First of all, I want to say that this is not clickbait.

There's actually solid evidence showing that the ground invasion, more or less, has begun.

I will get more to that in a second, the implications, what that's going to mean for us and our party, because this is going to actually be a point of no return, in my view.

I think it's a very serious moment.

I'll tell you directly where I got my intel from.

It's from Jackson.

And yeah, so we're gonna get into that.

Second of all, for the second half of the stream.

For the second half of the stream, I'm going to be doing the TikTok debates again.

And not even debates, just education.

Why?

Because I stream for five hours Sunday.

Which is a lot.

Because I genuinely enjoyed it.

I enjoyed being on TikTok, having no pressure at all, and just being able to talk to the idiots and my uh

I'm not one of these celebrities, these e-celebrities who are above interacting with the lowest, most irrelevant fucking retard.

All right.

And I like the discourse.

I like it.

I like being able to just have a free platform to educate and to push back and to debate these things.

So, in the second half of the stream.

Uh we're gonna be doing that again.

And ones if you're excited for that, by the way.

Anyway guys, not that this is a fucking democracy.

Okay, so I'm just gonna stop delaying it and tell you directly what's what's happening.

Okay.

So Trump is claiming that there's negotiations going on between Witkoff and the Iranians.

I believe that was denied by the Iranians.

However, it seems like

The talks of negotiations are ongoing.

This is not caffeine, by the way, this is chamomile tea, actually.

Because I need to fucking sleep.

Anyway.

Um

I also need my shirt to be fucking tailored.

Anyway, guys, no more swearing.

Look, Trump is sending the 11th MEU, 31st MEU, 82nd Airborne Division, 3,900 infantry in total with 3,900 support.

Two amphibious ready groups, including air support, warships, sub and land recon equipment.

One is coming from Okinawa, which has already departed and it is set to reach its destination this Saturday.

The other one has just left from San Diego.

Very serious business.

So let me tell you what the plan is.

They plan on taking the southeast part of Iran, which has two fully kitted ports, one international airport, that they're going to use to deploy an additional 3,000 members of the 82nd Airborne Division.

There isn't another airport within six hundred kilometers of Chabahar, which is where they plan on landing.

It's surrounded by dry land, flat terrain, desert.

There's only three roads into there.

So Iranian defensive deployments, at least in uh conventional defensive deployments, will not be able to

deter this kind of invasion.

And I want to show you a map so you understand exactly what I'm talking about.

This is set to happen this weekend, by the way.

And they're all the reason the invasion started, the reason I'm saying that is because they're already on the way.

They are already on the way, okay?

So, I'm gonna show you a few maps of Iran, okay?

So, let me show you this first.

Alright, uh this is this is so confusing.

I'm not gonna show you this one because this implies that India has something to do with this, which

Fuck, I I really every fucking map is is of India.

Like anyone gives a shit about India.

Alright, hold on.

Let me just get this very low-res piece of shit map with that doesn't even show borders.

It's quite incredible, actually.

It's quite incredible.

They don't have any good maps.

Here we go.

One map.

There we go.

Alright.

Here.

Okay, so this is the port, Chabahar port, okay, and notice something, they don't have to sail through the Strait of Hormuz, they don't have to spend a lot of time in the uh uh near Oman.

They don't have to spend a lot of time in the Gulf of Oman.

Uh they're just gonna land here, they're gonna get their ground equipment, ground troops there, they're gonna seize control of the international airport, which they're going to use to uh bring in more deployments and more ground troops.

And we're looking at a full-fledged ground invasion.

Full fledged ground invasion.

Now, if you don't know where this is, I want to show you.

What's significant about this?

This is in the Balochistan region.

So, undoubtedly, the plans of the United States are to do something similar to what they did with the Kurds in Iraq.

They're going to try to enlist the Baloch tribes to join them in the ground invasion of Iran and enlist them for support.

The Balochistan Separatists.

So to translate all of this for you, it's happening.

Okay?

I'll give you some additional information.

Two to three million Beluchis are there that they're planning on recruiting.

Actually the the the eleventh MEU from San Diego was deployed a few days ago.

And they're going to be deployed to the golf bases first.

And I want to give you an idea about how this could potentially go.

And what we could be looking at here, okay?

First of all,

If anyone thinks it's so over and this is going to be an easy march through Iran, I want to give you a picture of Iran's topography a little bit.

So, Balochistan is itself pretty mountainous with some natural defensive barriers.

But to the northwest of Balochistan, you have very difficult to maneuver natural defensive barriers, which undoubtedly play into the hands to the advantage of the Islamic Republic.

However, I think the United States probably does have the capacity to take control over this region and establish air superiority and just occupy it, at least in the beginning for a period.

Do I think that they're going to be able to take Tehran in two weeks like they took Baghdad in two weeks during Desert Storm?

No, I don't think that's going to be possible.

And that's why I'm really sharing this with you.

I'm not a fucking news anchor.

I'm not a news reporter.

I'm not a war correspondent.

I'm sharing this to you.

Because if this actually happens.

We are going to look at a conflict that could potentially last at the very bare minimum on the most conservative side of things six months.

If it lasts six months.

That is, six months of the Strait of Hormuz continuing to be closed.

And the world economy cannot afford that.

The American economy can't afford that.

The global oil markets cannot afford that.

And we are looking at something that directly has an impact to our party.

Our national congress is supposed to be this October.

If this goes on, how are our people going to afford plane tickets to go to the national congress?

That's such a stupid, superficial concern in the grand scheme of things.

But it just goes to show you it directly has relevance, even for our plans as a party, right?

And if it has plans for us as a party, of course, this is going to shut down the American economy.

The U.S.

cannot afford a war with Iran, a ground war with Iran, for six months.

I don't think it can.

I think that we're on the cusp of some major civil unrest in this country, some major political unrest.

And

A scenario of a ground invasion of Iran that is lasting longer than two weeks, longer than the promised four to five weeks, which wasn't even supposed to be a boots on the ground ground invasion that was never even planned.

These are the circumstances and conditions that are going to give rise to that second American Civil War we have always been talking about here.

And so it directly has relevance for us, guys.

This is very serious and the fact that you know it's a blind alley is that first of all Trump admitted in a press conference that they had no idea Iran was going to start targeting the Gulf bases and they had the expectation that by decapitating the leadership of Iran with Khamenei that that would be the end of it similar to the non-lethal decapitation of the leadership of Venezuela.

However, Iran is not Venezuela and things didn't go as they expected it to.

And now we're facing a scenario and a situation where the US is gearing up, because it has no choice, by the way, for a protracted conventional well, hybrid war, when you think about it.

But ground war with the Islamic Republic that will last a long time, a very long time.

And the more and and that obviously is to the benefit of the Islamic regime in the long haul Islamic Republic, I should rather say, in the long haul, benefits the Islamic Republic in the long haul, for certain.

Uh but most certainly is going to be an ugly conflict, for sure.

MF Villain, what's going on, man?

Appreciate you.

Few things to point out for consideration.

one.

The nature of war has changed.

In addition to the fact that Iran is not Iraq for it just because of its topography alone.

To say nothing of the fact that the Islamic Republic is infinitely more advanced than the Baathist state that existed in Iraq.

We are in an era of drone warfare.

I know what's going on on the front lines in Donbass and in the Ukraine war.

Russia borders Ukraine, and the front barely moves.

It's almost unmovable.

The United States doesn't border Iran.

It has to go through this extremely convoluted strategy just to land troops there.

What do you think it's gonna look like when Iran launches thousands, tens of thousands of cheap Chinese FPV drones to absolutely cause chaos and a complete breakdown of control for the occupation of Balochistan by the US ground forces?

The swam I mean, at this point the United States uh I understand Russia is much less brutal than the United States is.

I understand Russia will not go to the lengths the US might be willing to go to.

But understand something about the nature of war.

Okay, war is always about morale.

That's the only factor that's relevant for warfare.

If you have an army of brave,

People who don't care about their lives, but are so dedicated to the cause that they're going to just basically throw their lives away.

Then you don't have the same problems the US military does.

Okay.

The problem with the US military is that.

When you have operated a base of operations and you've occupied territory for the furtherance of US military operations, there's a need to there's a kind of operational paradigm, security paradigm that's in place where there's not there's no tolerance for chaos.

Meaning they have to secure airspace and they have to have a degree of security with respect to the safety of personnel before they are comfortable proceeding with the expansion of operations.

If FPV drones are just constantly bombing and taking out and killing US soldiers and disrupting operations,

The expansion of operations is just not going to be possible at the level of a uh the expansion of a ground war.

If you're a fanatical army that doesn't give a fuck, and you'll keep marching while you get picked off one by one, there's a drone here that you won't give a fuck.

You'll keep marching because, you know, you don't need that level of control necessarily.

You just kind of say, Alhamdulillah, you know, inshallah.

You just say, inshallah, and fuck it, right?

You just march in and you continue doing what you're doing, knowing that there's maybe a 5, 15, 30% chance you're going to be killed.

But you keep doing it anyway because you put the cause first.

Okay, but if there's a 2 to 5% chance that.

you know, US soldiers are going to be blown up, they're not going to take the risk.

Do you understand?

So just the usage of asymmetrical drone warfare on the part of the Iranians, similar to what's going on in the Ukraine war actually, will be enough to severely halt and deter and disrupt

US military operations by way of a a ground invasion and a ground war.

So this is the situation we're looking at.

So, we are looking at a scenario.

Why is this relevant?

Because the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed for no other reason than the fact that if the United States

has to move

defensive military infrastructure for the interception of drones and missiles and so on to the Balochistan region, which is going to be a pretty long term base of operations for a pretty long term protracted ground war invasion.

This will leave the Gulf states defenseless.

The United States has already moved the Patriot systems from South Korea to the Gulf states.

Who's to say they're not going to have to move those same Patriot systems to Balochistan if they mount a ground invasion?

The Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed.

Not only that, but the movement of U.S.

military personnel here is going to leave the Gulf states highly vulnerable.

If I were the Iranians, I would not.

Uh and you know what?

I'm so worried that this is gonna happen actually.

If I were the Iranians.

I would not bother with

Uh basing my hostility toward the Gulf States on whether or not they're hosting US military personnel.

If US military personnel evacuate the Gulf states and all move to a ground invasion in Balochistan, Iran could still use a now more defenseless Gulf GCC community as leverage to actually blackmail the United States.

Just bomb the shit out of the Emirates, bomb the shit out of the Saudis, bomb the shit out of the Qataris, and the United States will panic.

Why?

Because you're looking at the centers of the global oil markets and the linchpins of the entire global US economic system at large.

If the Iranians are smart, which I believe they are, they will not stop their hostilities toward the Gulf states.

They'll continue bombing Gulf States throughout this entire ground invasion, which they should.

Um of course they should.

But um this is what's now happening.

Now, there is a slight chance, and I don't

Even want to entertain this outcome or possibility that negotiations go through and sell outs and traders within the Islamic Republic prevail, like in Venezuela, and that's that.

That's the only way that the ladder of escalation doesn't climb higher.

So there are two vectors going on right now.

One vector is in the direction of world revolution.

The other vector is in the direction of a long term postponement of that same world revolution and an era of global reaction, so to speak, setting in.

Uh there is a direct line between the US ground invasion of Iran and world revolution.

Because the longer that conflict continues, the longer the Strait of Hormuz continues to be closed, the longer that insurance companies will no longer cover the cost of travel for commercial vessels to traverse the Strait of Hormuz, we're looking at a worldwide energy crisis.

And given the fact that we're basically already in a worldwide economic crisis, a worldwide energy crisis will accelerate the vectors of political instability and social unrest in every single state on earth, besides a few like China and DPRK and so on.

But this is going to absolutely turn the world upside down, including the world of the United States itself domestically.

We're going to be looking at a situation of unprecedented domestic civil unrest in the United States itself.

I went to the pump the other day and gas was $4.5.

What's the price of gas in your local area?

Everyone, tell me right now.

Just go ahead, type the the price of gas in your area.

Mine was $4.05.

$399, $350, $579, $43.

Where the fuck are you, Texas?

$6.

$6.

You must be California, right?

$590.

Where the fuck do you guys live?

Holy shit.

$334.

Wow.

550.

Southern Washington, it's 550.

Wow.

Okay.

So, that's already happening.

That's already happening.

Now, what happens when gas goes up to $6 in the Midwest?

Fuck it, what happens when gas goes to $8 anywhere in the country?

What happens when gas reaches $10 in the United States of America?

Well, that's just about the threshold that I would say is the fuck this threshold for the U.S.

population.

Meaning, fuck this, it's the 4th of July, bring out the fireworks, we don't give a fuck anymore, we're gonna chimp out.

Uh the rednecks will take fireworks and just blow up the world.

They'll blow up everything.

Kmart is gonna fall.

McDonald's will fall.

Like, I just think that's kind of the ten if it gets ten dollars a gallon, just imagine that.

People are just gonna say, Fuck this.

It's gonna be a fuck this moment.

Someone's gonna go to the pump.

It's gonna be ten dollars a gallon.

They're gonna grab gasoline, uh, barrels of gasoline.

Uh, what are they fucking called?

Holy shit.

You know, they're gonna canisters of gasoline.

This is gonna start blowing shit up.

Fuck this.

I have to go to my stupid fucking job.

I'm tired as fuck.

Gross by the way, if there's an energy crisis, that means the price of food goes up too.

People are gonna be fucking pissed and they're gonna say fuck this shit.

And there was one fuck this shit moment in the history of recent and the recent history of the United States of America, which was 2020, because of the COVID lockdowns.

I don't care how many of these people were liberals who cared about Black Lives Matter objectively.

Did the entire country start blowing up Target and McDonald's because they cared so much about George Floyd?

No, nobody cared about George Floyd.

Everyone said fuck this because they were sick of the disruption.

The disruption of everyday life started making them realize how retarded and shitty life in general in this country is and how irrational and torturous it is.

And it was the fuck this shit moment that led to the explosion of Targets and McDonald's everywhere.

And an energy crisis is going to cause a level of social instability that I would say is far more intense than the lockdowns were.

Because the lockdowns at least permitted people with the ability.

To sit home, watch Netflix, order Uber Eats with the Trump stimulus checks that they were given, and everyone was kicking back, chilling.

And that still caused them a huge degree of aggravation and social anxiety.

Oh, social anxiety.

Civilizational anxiety

And a you know, uh, just grievance, okay.

So it that that fucked shit up.

That was a fuck this shit moment, okay.

So we are looking at another fuck this shit moment in the United States this year, probably.

I think I know the nature of human beings, I know the nature of my fellow Americans.

If if in the Midwest somebody goes to the gas pump and it's $8 a gallon, people will start shooting guns in the sky and like straight up just just fucking fuck this shit.

They're gonna just start smashing and ramming their cars into shit and they're just gonna fucking lose their mind and get so pissed.

And it's gonna be a breakdown of

And that's going to create, in my opinion, I want to be a fortune teller here.

I'm the new Professor Jung.

Okay, so Iran, Iran.

So the mountains here in Iran are noticed because the Gnostics and the Sabbatean Jews have conversated in these mountains that Alright, well no, I'll just give you uh what I consider a reasonable prediction, all right?

My very reasonable prediction is going to be that the massive degree of irrational, meaningless social unrest that happens as a consequence of the forthcoming energy crisis, provided that this ground invasion happens, is going to be responded to politically in the form of a division of the House, quite literally, the House divided at the level of Washington, D.C.

Democrats will point the fingers at Trump, Republicans will point the fingers at Democrats, and that is when we're going to really start seeing the constitutional crisis that's already underway, by the way, intensify into something that could potentially be an armed conflict of some kind.

Social unrest is violent by nature.

It's bound to happen that it's going to lead to people killing each other in some capacity.

That spilling over into a like intra-regime conflict of some kind, National Guard versus police versus conventional military, yada yada yada.

Very possible.

It's absolutely very possible.

There's already a constitutional crisis underway.

And if I don't know who's forgotten this, but.

The midterm elections are this year.

And we're looking at a population that is very disillusioned with both the Democrats and the Republicans at this point.

Trump's former base, they are not having it.

Nobody buys these narratives.

Nobody's cheer there's about I think Dugan was right, about fifteen percent of the US population is cheerleading what's going on.

And then fifteen percent are you know uh sorry, fifty percent are Democrats.

They're they're divided themselves.

Thirty five percent are the MAGA Tucker Carlson fans, okay?

And um

I don't know if any of this is planned.

I don't know if this is part of some long-term agenda.

I couldn't tell you that.

Carlos, what's up, man?

I couldn't tell you if this was part of a long-term agenda or not, but what I could tell you is that the foundations and the basis and the seeds are being laid, more or less.

And I mean this very seriously.

Four.

The US Civil War.

This is how it happens.

You just have an an um

You have an energy crisis, okay, which we cannot afford as a society.

We don't have the morale or the resolve.

We're not un unif w we're really just the reason we're everyone's so on edge in this country, but the reason people are domesticated is a few things: alcohol.

uh video games, pornography, mm, you know, uh some some small degree of small comforts and in that people find.

Mm, just but when when that becomes impossible, when people can't even fucking afford to commute to work anymore,

Um

Yeah, people are going to be ready to just start popping off and just say fuck it's going to be the fuck this moment, okay?

It's gonna be the fuck this moment.

We are not a society unified by any morale that will have us endure.

And can you can anyone does anyone want to laugh at the idea of that?

Hey, I want you to think about something, okay?

The the just think about something for one second.

I want you to laugh a little bit, 'cause the the idea is just kinda fucking funny, right?

You have

I gotta tailor my fucking shirt, man.

This is whatever.

Who gives a shit?

Look.

You have the Iranians who've been living under crippling sanctions for decades.

You have the Cubans that have been living under the world's most

Sadistic embargo for how many years?

Does anyone know the amount of years it's been exactly?

Um

Minimum sixty?

Yeah, sixty.

Sixty years of embargo.

Uh that the Cuban people have been suffering.

Sorry.

Sorry.

I'm very I'm motivated by rage right now.

And when this shit stops working.

It's gonna set me off.

That's gonna be my fuck you moment.

All right?

It's gonna be my fuck you moment.

You understand?

My fuck this moment.

Anyway, uh I have intense k I have a I'm I'm always in control.

Understand that even when I have rage and I spur gout, I'm totally in control the whole fucking time.

That's why I'm so deadly.

Do you understand?

But uh the Koreans have been suffering worse conditions maybe than the Cubans.

So Iranians, Cubans

Koreans of the DPRK, what do they all have in common?

They have the morale to endure it.

They've come together as a society and they said, This is our collective.

you know, uh uh collective hardship that we're gonna endure together and make meaning out of together and we have this solidarity together that we're in it together and we're gonna endure and we're gonna survive and yada yada yada.

Now I want you to laugh a little bit.

Can you imagine Trump going on TV and saying, guys, hard times ahead, but all Americans lock arms together and just endure it.

And we're here in solidarity.

The wicked Iranians are doing to this.

And then go out on the street and start singing.

The Ayatollah is doing this.

And it's like, everyone, come together and just...

experience this breakdown of life and like have this reinforce the regime narrative that Iran is the bad guy and we'll we'll beat them don't worry we'll beat the Ayatollah it'll be like the commercials for Halo 3 right we got to finish the fight the covenant we're we're the oh my god we're losing so much the covenant needs to be defeated and then like we could I'll tell you you know who's gonna you know who that narrative is gonna appeal to

Mentally retarded army recruits who go on TikTok.

You know those stupid fucking Fed TikToks for.

Um, like 17-year-old retards who like glorify the military because they played a lot of Helldivers, and it's like it'll show the footage of the US aircraft carriers and play the song, like Yoho.

You know what I'm talking about?

Because I'm just I'm laughing because I'm thinking of the logo tweet.

Uh because Logo said something about how the US military is like a bunch of fucking cornball like epic bacon.

Like they have the fucking finely trimmed beards with the glasses and like the the uh lumberjack shirts.

They hi Epic Bacon

It's like the f corn just kind of military cornball shit.

You know what I mean?

The new metal.

Yo, hoist them back.

And like, they're like, don't fuck with the US military, man.

We're so powerful.

You see those TikToks?

Yeah, like Matt Walsh.

Yeah, so you guys know what I'm so you guys like this is like uh military cornball shit, right?

Um yeah, black rifle coffee military cornball shit.

Okay, though there's gonna be five percent of the population who go outside with candles and they're like Iran did this to us, but we will unite and persevere.

It's like gas is twelve dollars, electricity doesn't work, nobody bare people are eating canned food and they're literally shooting and killing each other.

And then the five percent cornballs, they're gonna go outside with candles.

Come on, guys, let's unite.

We'll get it together.

Let's be patriots.

Okay, I'm just okay.

The joke is over, but

Can you fucking imagine how ridiculous that scenario would be to even think about?

It's not gonna happen.

Like, we're not the Cuba.

We're not North Korea.

We're not Iran.

The minute there's a disruption of normal life, people are going to start grab.

There's six, what is it, 700 million guns in circulation in this country?

They're going to take out their AR-15s, take out their guns, just going to start shooting everywhere.

Not even each other necessarily, just everywhere.

And it's going to, you know, there's going to be some stray bullets here or there.

And people are just going to start blowing shit up, burning shit, killing each other, and fucking lose their minds.

The minute, the minute, the minute that life as usual is disrupted in this way.

The minute the look, could you think about this for a second?

Most third world countries, I don't have to say most, a lot of third world countries, they don't have 24-hour electricity.

Is there any region of the United States of America where the population could tolerate not having 24 hours of electricity for a very, very long time?

Well we've seen it with natural disasters.

And but whenever it's a natural disaster, there's never anything to blame.

You just say, oh, we'll just blame the natural disaster.

And then it's people start to then realize the government's to blame because where's our taxes going?

They're not helping us.

But when people realize that this energy crisis and they're not getting twenty-four hour electricity anymore because of Trump's retarded invasion of Iran.

Um

People are going to really get pissed and very angry, violently angry at the US government.

Like very, very angry.

And uh I don't I don't think we can we can handle it as a society, I just don't.

And that's what you really have to.

If you want to take away something about this ground invasion for the domestic, what does it mean domestically for us?

For us in America, what does it mean?

Um you know, take away the following fact.

We can't afford it as a society.

We simply cannot, will not be able to afford it.

So

Uh we have to start preparing, okay?

Um I think we'll know more definitively by the weekend.

How this is gonna go, we're gonna know by the week's end.

And the weekend, but also the week's end.

That's when we're going to get a clearer idea of

You know, what trajectory, what kind of vector we're gonna be on.

Who knows?

Maybe there's gonna be negotiations and it all ends, you know, in a week.

We're coming up on the three to four to five week deadline that Trump announced at the beginning all of this, of all this, by the way.

And uh

Preppers, let's prepare.

What if there's a draft?

Orvo, what a wonderful question.

What if there's a draft?

That I cannot answer in any public capacity, and I won't.

So I'll just smile and stare at the camera.

So, that's it, really.

So yeah, that's my answer.

But apparently they're extending the uh draft

Age, potential draft age, if they do do a draft, to forty two, from thirty four to forty two years old.

And they are removing the uh prohibition on people who have a record of marijuana offenses.

Pretty serious.

It's gonna be like Ukraine.

They're gonna be they they're gonna be trying to draft a lot of old people.

Let me tell you something.

If there is a draft that is successful, you are going to have a considerable portion of the military-aged male population in this country who will get combat and operational combat military experience and access to military infrastructure that will accompany their deep hatred and resentment for the U.S.

regime.

And they will bring all their skills and experience back home with them.

And all of the access and know-how, back-end access to U.S.

military infrastructure.

They're going to bring all that back home.

And that

Would very much make a revolution possible in ways that it currently is not.

So, I mean, there's no way that that would that would very much intensify everything I'm talking about to such an extent that I don't even need a smile at the camera or anything.

I mean, it's by itself, it's gonna cause problems for sure.

Uh we are definitely looking at something which

There's no off-ramp.

And I keep emphasizing this every stream that I talk about this conflict and I talk about this issue, you know?

Which is the absence of an off-ramp.

Is my mic still working?

Say he's giving me an error.

Still working, still working, we're good, we're good, we're good.

Okay, good.

Okay.

My back is fucking killing me.

Shit.

Don't worry guys, it's all good.

We're all good.

So

Um

There's no off-ramp because if the United States withdraws

It will have had to do so under Iran's terms and conditions, because Iran is not going to stop until the US is gone from the region.

And if the United States accepts the terms that Iran is demanding, then that's the end of the US Empire.

And even if somehow this is able to end without that happening,

The US will never recover from having shown the world that Iran was able to stand up to it.

It's another factor people don't understand.

Short of a comprehensive regime change, there is no recovery.

There's no way to save face for the United States because it accomplished literally nothing.

Literally nothing.

I want you to think about that from all of this.

What did the United States accomplish so far?

Nothing.

There is no victory Trump can bring back home.

And it's not as though.

There's a gray area between victory and defeat here.

He either comes home a winner or he comes home a loser.

And if he comes home now, he comes home a fucking loser.

Not only will this disgrace Trump forever in the eyes of the US conventional politics.

This is going to destroy the prestige of the United States Empire around the world forever, way more, by the way, than Iraq and Afghanistan did.

And I'll tell you why.

The United States left Afghanistan because it could no longer afford to occupy Afghanistan.

The United States left Iraq for the same reason.

But the United States is getting its fucking ass kicked with conventional ballistic missiles.

Its bases are being terrorized and bombed.

By the way, in Iraq itself, Victoria Base was just evacuated.

Thousands of U.S.

military personnel evacuated one of the largest bases the U.S.

has in the Middle East because of the Iraqi militias and popular security forces, mobilization forces.

And Iran is humiliating the United States through the use of sophisticated military hardware, not through a bunch of guerrillas in the mountains with AK-47s and RPGs harassing an occupation that just is too costly.

This is like the U.S.

is getting its ass kicked in a far more conventional military sense.

So if it leaves now, there's no off-ramp like there was in Afghanistan and Iraq as far as the prestige of the global US uh empire.

How is the US going to beat its chest at China ever again after this?

That's the real question you have to ask.

How is the United States going to beat its chest and talk a big game to China or Russia ever again?

after this, if small much comparatively smaller Iran was able to cause it this much trouble.

This it's over.

This will be the end of Pax Americana.

It's the beginning of the end of the US Empire.

And this is a matter of objective fact, not opinion, by the way, this is fact.

This is one hundred percent fact.

PMF is hitting positions in Syria that I have not seen any confirmation of or evidence for.

Let me check my trusted news source.

Fucking translation doesn't work on desktop, great.

Yeah, I don't I don't even know what the fuck anything says.

Okay, let me see.

Let me see.

I'll check right now.

I'll check that right now.

I might have the ability.

Bill Fo, what's up?

Alright, let me try to see if you're if I can confirm what you're saying about Syria.

Okay, there's a recent missile attack against the Zionist entity that I could show you.

I'm not going to show it to you because there's no strike.

Okay, another swarm of drones on Saudi Arabia 30 minutes ago.

Explosions shaking Bahrain right now.

Uh, Iran, okay, according to Axios, I'll give you some updates.

Axios says that Iran informed mediators that it was deceived by Trump twice and it won't be deceived a third time.

So, regarding those who are putting their bets on the negotiations panning out, I wouldn't quite count on it, to be honest.

Um

Explosions shake Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Canadian Energy Minister, the world is facing the biggest disruption in energy supplies in history.

The Canadian Energy Minister is repeating what I just told you right now.

So anyone who says I'm kooky and I'm crazy for saying this, you need to understand this is some very serious shit.

Drone attacks are ravaging Kuwait, Saudi Arabia.

Uh missile strike from Iran toward Israel.

Israel's been getting hit a few times.

Iraqi resistance is destroying American radars and helicopters at the Victoria base at the capital Baghdad, which has by the way been evacuated.

Uh floods.

Tornadoes, rains are expected to strike Turkey, Syria and Iraq in the coming days, what the hell?

So I don't know where you're getting the Syria thing.

I can't find anything about Syria.

Global oil prices have exceeded $104 a barrel as of five days ago.

Uh yeah, this is fucking crazy.

Um

Cyprus demands a new security agreement regarding British bases after Iran's targeting of British bases.

The American base in Victoria has been getting pummeled in Iraq, by the way.

A lot of people don't know this.

The Iraqi resistance are hitting them hard.

Yeah the source for uh oil is eighty nine dollars.

Well, I'm reporting from what was at seven or six PM, so I don't know.

Couldn't tell ya.

I don't know where you're getting the cereal thing, that'd be crazy.

Iraq, I always knew, of course, the Iraqi resistance would join the war.

I know that.

Of course, I know that.

Um that what I mean, what why do you think Iran has been supporting the Iraqi militias so aggressively for decades to so that they wouldn't help in an event like this?

Of course.

And the killing of Kamenai was just uh

I mean, it was just outrageous to Shias around the entire region, you know, for whom he was a a religious leader, their religious leader, their Marjah.

Although, you know, technically there's local marjahs and all this kind of stuff, but a lot of for a lot of people, Khamenei was the guy

So

Yeah, we're looking at a pretty grim grim scenario.

You know, as far as

Scott Ritter said Iran has a thorium nuke.

Yeah.

Yeah, can we just like this is slop?

Just slop.

Just total slop.

Could Iran hit the American Navy before they even reach Iranian soil?

That I couldn't tell you.

I don't know.

I'm not a, I have no fucking idea.

Uh those those ships that are coming for the ground invasion are equipped, themselves equipped, with uh uh um

Missile defense systems

That much I know.

Now could Iran hit them with hypersonics, probably, I don't know.

But they are equipped with uh defensive air defense systems.

On board.

So uh

Yeah.

I mean we're we're looking at uh some serious serious

Serious escalation is happening.

Okay, rockets were launched from Mosul targeting the US base in northeastern Syria.

Got you.

I didn't know that base was still never mind.

Yeah, they can't hit moving targets, right, that makes sense.

Well, look, if the ground invasion happens, you're gonna see FPV drones, footage with cameras attached on them, blowing up American soldiers.

We're gonna see the American public is gonna see that.

So uh that's uh pretty uh

Pretty serious.

Pretty serious actually.

Pretty serious.

Pretty very real, very real.

What the hell?

Is this guy talking about the same thing?

This is from eleven hours.

Who the g who the first of all, who is this guy, Justin Taylor?

Can anyone tell me if this is uh

A c is this a cuffer or is this a decent guy, or is he a cuffer?

You know, at least my screw-ups don't cost half a billion dollars.

Right now, the US Navy is facing a problem: how to reopen the Strait of Hormuz against Iranian attacks while protecting civilian cargo tanks.

I don't know who the fuck that is.

It's like, who the fuck is this guy?

You're like, uh, he's CIA.

All right.

But good news: the US Navy spent billions designing a ship to fight this kind of fight in this kind of geography against this kind of enemy.

Bad news, it is quite possibly one of the worst ships we have ever built.

And also, for some reason, we literally just moved them from the Middle East, you know, the place where all the fighting is right now, to a random port in Malaysia.

Today we are going to be talking about the independence class littoral.

Okay, this is some CIA diversion tactics nonsense.

Okay.

Mm.

Complete fucking diversion diversionary nonsense.

This is what psychological collapse looks like.

Israeli and US strikes hit Merabad Airport in Tehran and destroyed at least 17 aircraft on the ground.

And Iran's response was to pile every vehicle they could find all over the airport, especially on runway 29R.

Fire trucks, ground support equipment, baggage carts, anything with wheels got dragged onto the tarmac.

You only do this when you're afraid someone is going to land troops on it.

Iran watched what happened in Iraq in 2003.

On April 3rd, the U.S.

Army's 3rd Infantry Division seized Saddam International Airport on the western edge of Baghdad.

Within days, the city had fallen.

Medabad sits in the same position for Tehran that Baghdad International sat for Baghdad.

Right on the edge of the capital, big enough to land anything.

So they're filling it with anything they can get their hands on.

This is what psychological collapse looks like.

That was five days ago.

If true, which you don't even know if it can be.

Remember when Trump said forty-eight hours and they're going to strike the power plants and then that didn't happen?

Uh it's just like losing face constantly.

On Trump's part.

Trying to find information about the invasion of Balochistan.

Maybe the ground invasion won't happen after they watch my stream.

Maybe they're gonna watch my stream and they're gonna say it's not gonna happen anymore.

Wouldn't that be wonderful?

Anyway guys, I think we're gonna move on to the next segment of the stream.

Um

We're going to be uh doing our debates.

Ones if you're excited for that.

Uh best way to show excitement of course is to uh drop um five subs, you know, I mean I just uh I'm just saying, I'm just saying, I'm just I'm just just saying.

Let's let's go ahead and start.

Jason, what's up, man?

Appreciate you.

Alright, let's start our uh debate segment or our education segm segment.

Think there was a lot of education, uh education.

Going on.

Gorilla, what the fuck, guys?

Thank you.

Holy shit.

Shrell Stanny, Gorilla.

Thank you guys.

Appreciate you.

What's up guys?

You can't see me right now, but trust me, I still exist.

Trust me, it's everything is still real, right?

I'm still real.

I've always been a real one.

Trying to get a good title in here, I'm saying Communism Works.

What is what is our dividing line with these Redditors?

It's always the L G B T shit that I just don't care about.

I don't even wanna

bait um that trigger them with that.

I just don't care.

Bass Vobulus, what's up?

Alright, we're gonna do this.

By the way guys, I want to tell you something.

Uh do not fucking donate on TikTok to me.

You wanna fucking donate?

Do it on Kik, where I get literally a hundred percent.

Don't fucking do it on shit talk, where they take fifty.

Alright.

Just letting you know.

Alright y'all, we're operational.

Okay, so um

Alright, uh so we're gonna be doing this and we're gonna be resuming.

We're gonna be um

Resuming our talk.

Holy shit.

I am actually you can see in my fucking eyes how tired I am, holy fuck.

That's okay.

We can solve that.

All right.

So uh we're gonna be having people debate.

We're gonna be having people step up and uh confront me with

Their objections, uh if they if they have any, uh which I doubt.

Because uh most of these people are not human.

But uh yeah, we're gonna be talking about uh in general Marxism, Marxism, Leninism, Communism, things like that.

You know, you have to first start out by pointing out the obvious, which is that.

If you want to if first of all, if you're interested in Marxist or Communist ideas, first thing you have to do is avoid communities besides ours, which is correct, but if you don't if you don't trust that, then avoid all of them, which have been founded on the basis of a shared

Interpretation because these communities have gone nowhere.

So you should directly

Directly try to interpret and understand what Marx, Lenin, Mao, and so on and so on were trying to say and avoid the prejudices that are established on subreddits and Discords and Reddits that attempt to monopolize the meaningfulness of the revolutionary tradition.

Why?

Because the people who try to monopolize the meaningfulness of communist experience and the revolutionary tradition, especially in Western countries, have not accomplished anything.

They've never accomplished anything.

I mean, if you're a Marxist-Leninist in the West, and I keep saying this and I keep emphasizing this, if you're, if you forget that, if you call yourself a communist and you live in a Western country, there has never been a successful communist revolution in any Western country.

So where does the gatekeeping and dogmatism come from?

That's what I want to know.

Where does the gatekeeping and dogmatism come from?

The question of how we interpret the revolutionary experiences of non-Western countries is not automatically given.

There are no academic gatekeepers who understand the Chinese revolution who live in Western countries.

Because if there were, they would be able to distill that experience and apply it to the country we live in.

But they haven't.

So therefore, they don't actually know anything about what happened in China.

Western...

quote-unquote Marxists don't know anything.

If they knew anything, they'd have the practice to show for it.

So the floodgates are open as far as how we interpret Marxism and how we make sense of it.

And there's no ability for anyone to say, you're a Nazbull, you're not a real leftist, you're not a real Marxist, yada, yada, yada.

Because where's the practice you have to show for this grandstanding, this sense of authoritative knowledge about the tradition when there's no practice to show for it?

This is the thing I've been saying since 2021 when infrared first launched.

That there's no basis for dogmatism because you have no practice to show for it.

Communism will never win.

Except in China, except in Russia, and pretty much destined to win on a world historical scale in exact proportion to the collapse and breakdown of Pax Americana, which is now happening as a consequence of the imminent ground invasion of Iran, which is going to cause a global energy crisis, which is going to lead to social unrest and political turmoil in nearly every nation on earth and break down the global economic and political system of geopolitical hegemony and financial control as we know it.

Now, if you don't think that's going to entail a victory of communism in the long run, then you probably just believe we're going to have another dark ages for another thousand years, which we may very well have.

We may have a dark age that lasts another thousand years.

But guess what?

After that dark age is over, communism's coming back.

In the end, communism will win, and it is a matter of cosmic inevitability.

It's unavoidable.

It's absolutely unavoidable and it's a matter of cosmic inevitability.

It is destined.

Communism is the resolution of cosmos, the deeper nature and lawful order of things, and logos, the principle that guides the development of said things and determinations.

The resolution of communism and the resolution of cosmos and logos is communism.

I am the Arab Professor Jong, and I will teach it to you on my white board.

I don't need a whiteboard to teach you the truth.

Communism is cosmos and logos reconciled and resolved.

Cosmos is the order of nature and the stars and the earth and the planets and the heavenly bodies and the biology and all of the things in the physical universe.

Logos is the underlying principle that guides the development of things which are only intelligible to the thinking consciousness and to human beings with the rise of humanity, which is the culmination of nature, by the way.

Now, for entire the history of humanity is a conflict between the cosmos and the logos.

And communism is a resolution of that conflict.

So it is a matter of inevitability, communism.

As long as there is cosmos and there is logos, on the other hand, there is the communism because both of these things occupy and partake and exist within the same reality.

Go ahead, Joey.

Hello?

Hello?

Can you hear me?

Yep.

Hey, uh do you like to do political debates or uh okay.

Great.

One thing that I I know that you're a pretty uh you're an ACP party member.

Um I think I understand the basics of your ideology.

I would just pose one quick thing.

Do you believe that communist movements can actually unify different civilizations?

I view them I view it as insufficient and that the Russian and Cynic civilizations are simply too incompatible, which is what led to all the conflicts during the Cold War.

That's how it works.

You build cities along the border.

And then the cities are commercial and cultural and sites of exchange.

And that's how people just become.

Fused together.

But do you do you actually believe that these civilizations can be fused?

I think this is uh in the in the long run, yeah, they can be fused in proportion to the proliferation of other differences.

Uh for example, you know, difference is something that is also constantly being reproduced in a direct proportion to the uh cur kind of consolidation of homogeneity.

So there's nothing there's the problem is not the difference and the problem is not the homogeneity.

The problem is finding the harmony between the two.

And the notion that the boundaries between the two are fixed is absolutely false.

So currently we have certain boundaries of the heterogeneity and the homogeneity.

These boundaries change across history.

Will there always be differences between people?

Yes, but which people?

This will always change, never has remained constant.

I guess my argument is a bit different in the sense of not purely from a civilization.

You can stay, Joey.

I didn't interrupt you, but congratulations, 15 people left because they thought you were boring.

But I just wanted to let you know that.

Please continue.

Oh, would you like me to be more.

No, no, no, just continue.

I just wanted to let you know people found you boring.

I don't know if it makes you feel.

Go ahead.

Sure.

I mean, I think the topic is, I think I'm trying to be a bit unique.

You know, I feel like a lot of the talking points are over and over.

But the key thing for me is that you see two great continental empires, the Russians and the Chinese.

And I think that inherently they want the other side to be weak.

That's why Stalin funded both sides of the Chinese Civil War.

And that's why China is okay with the USSR dissolving.

I don't think you can have two great superpowers bordering each other because that undermines both of their security.

Yeah, but this is why, by the way, six people just left because they were really bored by what you said.

But I just want you to be aware of these things.

But anyway, no, this is the problem with your paradigm is it doesn't understand how the internal contradictions within the Soviet Union and China played the determining and driving role in the interactions between the communist movement within China on one hand and the USSR on the other hand.

The reason that Moscow was suspicious and wary of the Chinese was not because Stalin feared China and because of an inevitable kind of civilizational clash between Russia and China.

It was because.

I haven't slept in one day, so you'll forgive me for not remembering the precise conference.

No worries.

I'm not here to like.

Don't interrupt me.

There's a specific conference that happens following a series of continuous tactical military defeats on the part of the People's Liberation Army and the Chinese, the Communist Party of China.

And this is in the early 1930s.

And this is a consequence of the fact that the Chinese were following the advice of the Moscow-educated and aligned Communist Party leadership and attachés that were sent from Moscow to basically domineer and lead the communist movement within China, you know, on behalf of the Comintern.

Now, out comes Mao Sedong, who very much is a heterodox Marxist with respect to the Common Turn's orthodoxy and specifically the Moscow's orthodoxy.

Mao is an unconventional thinker for a number of reasons.

He has a kind of unique appraisal of the class conditions within China.

He believes there's a revolutionary potential among the Chinese peasantry.

The majority of Marxists in China claim that the peasantry were petty bourgeois.

They owned property or something.

So Mao, he he is disagreeing with the dogmas of Moscow, the institutional dogmas.

And because of the failures of the PLA and the CPC yeah, the Zun Yi conference, thank you so much, the Zun Yi Conference I knew it started with a Z, I was fuzzy on on the name.

Uh Mao won out, he won the he his arguments were compelling, and that's what began the Long March, okay, which is a series of guerrilla tactics pioneered by Mao, which saved the CPC.

And this humiliated Moscow, and that is the source and the beginning of the tension.

And you know these this that exact clift between Mao's revolutionary strategy, which is unconventional, which is based in guerrilla war, which is based in being rooted in the Chinese masses and the Chinese peasants, fell out with Moscow's orthodoxy.

That was the source of the tension.

It wasn't because Stalin feared a powerful China for the sake of it.

What Stalin specifically feared was that there was going to be a new kind of center of rev Marxism and Communism that undermined the institutional orthodoxy.

uh centered in Moscow, which could lead leads to all sorts of problems which you can absolutely translate domestically within the Soviet Union.

For example, what about what if these Siberian uh kind of ambiguous populations within Russia began to take up Mao's line of thinking and apply it domestically and internally?

This kind of suspicion of experts, this wariness with respect to um

There were isola there were kind of examples of this in the USSR.

For example, the the Shakty trial, the trial of the various Menshevik engineers.

You had the Stakhanov movement itself.

But ultimately, Stalin remained committed to the social democratic paradigm.

of the urban proletariat taking a leading role.

And um

Ultimately, uh that was the source of the conflict.

It wasn't because there's no possible the problem with your view is it's metaphysical, Joey.

You believe that these civilizations are completely self-same discrete categories of identity and that there's just an incommensurability of identity.

You know, cat cannot be dog, fox cannot be wolf, whatever.

But you neglect the dimension of logos, the real principle that gives these civilizations the determinations they have.

That principle is continuously suspended in a revolutionary development.

And it manifests itself in the internal contradictions of each civilization.

Uh to say that a civilization is incompatible with another innately

Neglects what actually gives that civilization its character in the first place.

Yeah, I guess for me, my argument is quite simple.

You can make arguments of experts, urban versus rural, to justify what created the collapse of the Sino-Soviet split.

I'm simply suggesting that it is because of civilizational incompatibility.

How?

No, no, name the causal mechanism.

How?

Well, I would say for one, it's the idea that a civilization creates a great empire.

And these are poop-fart, hoifor, poop-fart strategy map game.

Give me the causal mechanism that makes Russia and China irreconcilable at the level of bordering communities.

Like at the level of the people themselves.

There's no ability for them to fuse together in any kind of way.

And there's an absolute barrier between them.

Just like at that level, talk about it.

Don't say, well, there's a big empire and that big empire doesn't like the other big empire.

It's like this is brain rot from map games.

Okay.

Give me the causal mechanism.

Are you saying biologically?

Because there's some racial theorists who will claim, well, there's these immutable racial characteristics we acquired in the savannah 200,000 years ago, which still are the causal determining basis of the character of civilizations.

I kind of think that's really stupid.

But you're free to argue that if you want, but what's the causal mechanism?

Sure.

My argument's not along racial lines.

I think that's pretty played out.

My argument is more along the idea of being a continental empire and that we've seen throughout history continental empires can't be secure unless their neighbors are failed states.

Okay.

So you just gave me a big poop fart answer.

It's a very big poop.

Very, very loud fart.

Like it's a big big one.

Um

But what you didn't do is explain the causal mechanism specifically.

Besi w without resorting to this metaphysical abstraction of the eternity of continental empires who what makes it impossible for two imperial centers, for example,

Forget about this abstraction of imperial centers.

Analyze how the Soviet Union worked concretely.

Don't just claim it's an empire.

How did the empire work?

'Cause it's not the same kind of empire as

you know, the British Empire, for example.

And then talk about the kind of the People's Republic.

What what was structurally and systematically incommensurate?

'Cause I could give you an answer at the causal level.

Um so I challenge you to do the same thing.

Sure.

And just so I understand you're saying between like the Tsarist regime and the Soviet regime?

No.

Between the Soviet regime and the People's Republic of China, what was actually structurally incommensurate in terms of how these systems worked?

Sure.

I would say that both, I know you're not going to like this answer, but both the Chinese Communist Party and the Soviet Communist Party were inherently quite nationalistic.

And because of this disputed territory such as Manchuria, and such as the territories that were taken by the Russian Empire against the Qing Empire, that this revanchism would forever happen between these two great civilizations.

Okay.

So those border disputes have already been resolved, by the way, through bi um bilateral treaties between the Russians and Chinese.

So I guess that argument is just shot out of existence because of things that have actually happened recently.

Well, I mean, w again, you're we're talking about during that time period.

No, I'm saying that the idea that it would have been impossible for them to come to an understanding about those doesn't square with the fact that they have already done so today.

Well, I will say this.

It's because the Russian civilization has been so degraded to the point that they can no longer actually exert much influence in the region.

And they have China hasn't taken over those regions and annexed them.

Yet.

Yeah, but okay, so China has not performed in the capacity of transgressing the legalistic agreements it makes within a bilateral framework thus far, so this is just pure speculation.

And you can't argue with speculation that is baseless.

You just say, well, it's going to happen.

Okay, so.

The y you're proposing that the reason for the Sino-Soviet split ultimately lied i it lied in the disputed territories over the history of Russia and China.

Yes, because I do go to the original point of that it's because continental empires can't allow strong continental empires next to each other.

And poopy farts.

Another reduction to poopy, poopy wet farts can't poop all over the place without leaving a poop stain on the poop fart noise.

But one quick thing.

This is just complete metaphysical gibberish.

Okay.

Specifically what happened with respect to the breakdown of relations between the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union, which happens after Stalin's death, by the way, the roots of the tensions lie in the fact that Mao Zedong tapped into a revolutionary strategy and a revolutionary subject, the construction, structure of a revolutionary subject, which is the institutional and political base of political power itself, became an irreconcilable political paradigm, structural, systemic, and political economic paradigm.

I can explain how that is concretely with respect to the system that existed in the Soviet Union.

And that made mutual recognition almost impossible.

The Soviets were disgusted by the way Mao was running things in China.

And it's not that they weren't able to understand it.

It's precisely because they were able to understand it that they were hostile to it.

These bureaucrats and technocrats in the USSR were looking at China and saying, would we let this happen in our country?

Hell no.

So first of all, we can't share a kind of great big union with the Chinese because we have a fundamental disagreement about how shit's supposed to be run.

And that was a close a kind of class antagonism and distinction that we're talking about.

You had Soviet educated engineers and experts that became the foundation of the People's Republic of China infrastructurally.

The engineers, the scientists, the technical experts, first of all, were all educated in Russia.

And then in addition, Russia sent its own engineers and experts to China.

Now, what it also sent was loans.

They gave them pretty generous loans, but these loans are what kind of were the bedrock and the basis of China's initial industrial development in the 1950s.

Now, Joey, what actually ended up happening is that a major dispute and conflict ensued within the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, I think around the time of the second.

Second five third five year plan, I forget.

Where they're saying, okay, so far we've been industrializing on the back of Soviet loans, but the pace of our industrialization is such that we're never even going to repay these loans.

Okay, so we're kind of permanently putting ourselves in debt to the Soviets, and we're not able to build our own industrial base that is actually going to like escape this dependency.

Structurally and institutionally, the adoption of Soviet paradigms of development and industrialization was the reason for this.

The Chinese had adopted Soviet expertise and Soviet educated expertise, and they had to think outside of the box and search for creative solutions for how they're going to industrialize their country, which inevitably is going to disrupt the system of bureaucracy and industrial development that the Soviets saw as sacred, sacrosanct, and orthodox, right?

And just kind of a given.

So there was a conflict within China between doing things the Soviet way or this new creative way.

And the Soviets didn't like this for a number of reasons.

One,

Um they thought that this was like a blind alley.

You know, the Chinese are gonna pursue they're gonna pursue the construction of socialism in a way that totally defies all of our paradigms and and and methods of development.

Du doesn't that provoke a degree of introspection on our part?

Should this leads us to even question how we're doing things now, which they very well could have question.

So the roots of the tension has always been in a kind of class struggle within the bureaucracies.

The Soviet bureaucracy was fearful, ultimately, that something like Mao's disruption of the Communist system was going to happen or spill over into the Soviet Union, which they were deathly afraid of.

That was the source.

That's how I'm naming causally the source of the disruption and the dispute.

It wasn't because there was a failure of mutual understanding.

There was precisely a mutual understanding.

And the understanding was on the basis of an irreconcilable difference of the future of socialist construction.

And I guess the other causal relationship that I think gets missed a lot, especially when we look back on the post-mortem.

And by the way, if this problem didn't exist, all the border disputes and that could have easily been resolved.

No problem.

They could have formed a union state together.

Such talks, by the way, were motioned.

It wasn't impossible.

If the Soviet Union can exist uh uh as a union of all these disparate cultures and so on of course there could be a union state with the Chinese, as long as there's a they're on the same page about what socialist construction is and what the proletarian dictatorship is.

But there is a dis disagreement at that level.

Which was a reflection of contradict uh a kind of symmetrical and parallel contradictions both within China and the USSR.

There was a very prominent faction and force within Chinese politics and institutions that represented the Soviet way of doing things and pushed for increased closeness and so on with the Soviet Union.

For example, even in the heydays of the Cultural Revolution, Lin Bao.

Uh fled fled to the Soviet Union.

And then, um, for example.

During the speech in 1959, in the midst of the Great Leap Forward, or was it 1960?

I forget.

Um, what was his name?

He was accused of being a Soviet spy and denounced on that basis and arrested.

A lot of people were one specific guy who gave a speech at the uh uh Henan, was it the Henan conference?

I forgot.

I literally haven't slept in one day, so I forgot.

It's okay.

I just want to interject real quick.

So, Peng, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Uh, I think it was Peng D.

I think, I believe it was, I believe it was.

One thing that I just want to stress, though, is that Stalin was by the way, Lushan Conference, not Hinan, what the fuck am I talking about?

The Lushan Conference.

I remembered.

Lushan Conference.

Anyway.

If your theory was correct, this

internal conflict wouldn't have existed.

It would have just been the Chinese versus Russians.

But we see it wasn't so.

Well, I wouldn't say it's as simple as Chinese versus Russians, because I agree with you.

The Soviets were multi-ethnic.

They were the descendants of just the Russian Empire.

But the key thing is that the great conflict with Stalin, in particular in terms of antagonizing Mao and essentially the seeds that led to the collapse of relations, was because he was a real student of Realpolitik.

He actually did not want to see a unified China.

He did fund both the KMT.

No, there's no proof of that.

Stalin.

It's just speculation.

The reason Stalin had close ties to the KMT was for two reasons.

One, Stalin.

Uh in the 1920s, the KMT was a popular front, wasn't inherently anti-communist.

All of that changed in 1927 during the Shanghai massacre.

But during the Japanese invasion of China,

And by the way, Stalin was a cynic.

He didn't believe that Mao's peasant-led army was going to be able to assume leadership of China.

So they were banking on the KMT still being the real leaders of China.

And by the way, don't this is so normal for the Soviets because the Soviets are dealing with a world where the majority of the communist parties are marginal forces.

So you want to deal with the leadership of a country, you deal with the actual leaders, not the idealists and ideologues who agree with you.

Yeah.

It's just kind of Soviet way of thinking.

But there was also a popular front after the Japanese invaded where the communists and the KMT aligned.

Now, the idea that's so this is the basis of Stalin quote-unquote funding both sides.

The reality is, Soviet support for the communists in China was absolutely decisive for their victory because the Manchuria

Soviet invasion of Manchuria is what gave the Communists a base of operations, militi access to advanced, relatively advanced military infrastructure and capabilities that they could use to uh conquer the rest of China to the south.

So if Stalin didn't want China to be unified, he sure as hell did a a bad job of preventing it from happening.

I think the reason why I say he didn't want to unify China is because when there was an attempt for Mao to clip a Chiang Sai-check, it was put down by Stalin.

He essentially didn't commend the operation.

I think this would have been 34, 5 or 6.

I can't remember.

At the time in which the Russians regarded the KMT as the dominant force within China and didn't want to jeopardize their relationships, that's not proof of Stalin not wanting China to be unified.

It's just proof that he didn't want to make a risky move with respect to the forces he considered the dominant leadership within China.

Yeah.

And I think the other example of how they were okay with essentially a fractured, failed China at its border was taking all the territories from the Qing Empire, where they actually started to seize territory.

And they liked that because they could physically expand their borders.

The the Soviet Union did not do that.

Uh the Soviet Union did take territory during the Chinese Civil War.

The Soviet Union not from the Qing Empire.

Sorry, um from the descendants of the Qing Empire during the Warlord period.

Okay, uh which territory specifically are you referring to?

Uh I believe the pronunciation was uh Xiaoma.

It was um in western China and it was fed into Tanituva, I believe.

And also bringing Mongolia and setting it up as yeah, Mongolia.

We're we're not gonna talk about Mongolia right now, but uh

That's that's a more complicated case.

I thought you would you would be referencing Mongolia.

Uh you're talking about in western part of China yeah, well

Uh again, I don't think this is proof that the Soviets were deliberately attempting to prevent the unification of China.

And I guess the I want to go on, continue to watch this.

I'm going to simplify this.

You see different civilizations.

I ask the question: what makes civilizations the way they are?

There's a logos, okay?

The logos, there's a shared intelligibility of the same logos that makes one civilization different from another within the other civilization, which if you want me to translate to you.

Logos is universally intelligible.

Okay, so you can't say, well, this is the Chinaman and this is the Russian, and they're just distinct specimen.

No, there's a reason they the way they are, and that reason is mutually intelligible, actually, both internally and between each other, right?

In terms of like an exchange of perspectives or whatever.

And also, in what ways could I also be like this or see things this way?

And that manifests in internal contradictions.

So, this is the problem I have with the kind of metaphysical idea of discrete civilizations that are self-same identities.

The logos that makes a civilization.

is not exclusively intelligible only to that civilization.

It's the same logos responsible for the development of all history across all the whole world, right?

Like the Hegelian spirit, if you will.

Look, I totally agree with you.

I think you can socially engineer someone into a different civilization.

It's not there's not a different thing.

It's not about socially engineering.

It's about the fact that there is no meta-civilizational framework where one can s be said to be better than the other.

There are different ways of responding to the same thing and you cannot say like, well, it's not even like about better in a normative sense.

It's about like, well, we're going to do it this way instead of that way because.

There's no because.

There's no kind of meta-civilizational framework with which to compare them.

That's the problem in the first place.

I guess the uh the the main point that I wanted to make, and I wanted to I would this is the one that I'm actually curious about your take.

Since I operate under a concept of clash of civilizations and not necessarily on a racialized line, but along a linguistic, cultural line, religious line, even but you consider these things hard barriers, and I see the I see the fluidity of these barriers.

Yes, I understand.

I agree.

They can become fluid.

I just think that it's in the border regions, not as a whole.

But my main point.

No, no, as a whole, there's a fluidity that is in the form of the internal contradictions.

The fact that they're just constantly suspended in development and change.

And the logic underlying that change is what's decisive.

Yes.

But I want to pose this to you.

I understand that you would like to implement a similar political system of the Chinese inside the American system, but since we've seen the insane competition infighting land disputes between the Chinese and the Soviets, who's to say that even if you implement this system, there won't be an inevitable clash between American and Chinese civilization.

Mm, because w we have to understand first what is a civilization.

It's because we don't understand what is a civilization at the level of.

Uh at the level of uh um how should I say?

a consciously intelligible logos that we st that there was uh that there are such disputes in the first place.

And only the transition from American barbarism to civilization will universalize the science of civilization for mankind.

China is a civilization, but is the logos of Chinese civilization overtly and explicitly transparent to the Chinese or anyone?

No, of course it's not.

It's profoundly unconscious and remains only unconscious.

So the true science of civilization doesn't exist yet.

Now, people like Alexander Dugan attempt to establish the foundations of this science.

As a Marxist and materialist, I don't fully agree with Dugan, but

He is

Occupying a niche that Marxists are not.

With respect to that.

Fair enough.

I will say I appreciate our conversation.

And just remember, I do believe that the results of history are not determined by ideology, but based off our history and our civilizations.

Ideology is merely a ideology is about ideality.

It's about the eidos and idea.

But logos is more fundamental than eidos.

So let's talk about logos.

Anyway.

But uh I appreciate your time and I wish you the best.

You too.

Bye bye.

You also dropped ten ten subs.

Only if you want.

Okay, who else uh requesting?

Someone else was requesting.

Nobody's requesting.

Na-no-n-n.

This is just uh great content.

So I'm talking about Marxism and uh the inability for dogmatism to be

Possible in western countries when you've never had a successful.

Revolution or practice to show for it.

I'm your

What's up?

Thank you so much.

Request

Course.

Who has a problem?

You say you're trolling, right?

Trayvon, go ahead and request and see who's trolling.

Go ahead and request and we'll see who's trolling.

Why do you think I'm trolling?

What is this?

You think it's the circus?

Somebody named Eurasian Larp just joined, thank you for that name.

What a great name.

Guys, I'm just an unk.

I'm literally 29.

I'm an old person.

So you could just troll me.

I'm so stupid.

I'm like a boomer.

You just trolling me.

I'm so clueless.

Unc status.

You need a banner with the topic.

I'm unkn status.

I don't understand anything about Tic Tac.

Tic Tac.

I don't know how to use Tic Tac.

So it's not my fault.

I I uh tic-tac is just very difficult for me to understand.

You're so whatever coded.

Can you speak English, buddy?

What are you talking about?

Kinda talking nonsense here.

Unk thought Stalin stages him as proof that he wanted Yeah, and I thought you were making fun of me for a second.

I I don't think Stalin it's not Stalin's fault, by the way.

It's the fault of the institutionalization of many of the pregiven conventions of social democratic theory that the Bolsheviks didn't have time to comprehensively reevaluate.

And Stalin is the voice of the party.

He's the voice of the Soviet Union on an impersonal level.

So of course he's going to

You know, the same things that made Stalin great were also the same things that

are in the thirty percent that that Mao criticized, the things that uh made Stalin a less revolutionary thinker than Mao.

Stalin is still, I mean,

Don't get me wrong, he's still Stalin, but

Um, he was wrong with respect to his dispute with Mao, you know?

You're a legend, I like your stuff.

Thank you, man.

Is Putin Putin holding back Russia?

No, he's not.

He's not.

Uh Putin is not holding back anything.

Russia itself

Is holding itself back.

Well, it's not holding itself back.

It just hasn't discovered how to pursue socialism today in the 21st century at the level of the society.

The society itself, r Putin just represents the state of Russian society, you can't blame him.

You can't you cannot blame him at all.

You think Russia yes, of course.

I mean, um Russia is in infrastructurally a socialist country.

Okay?

And Russia is a socialist country.

You want to debate me on that?

I'll take you to town on it.

Russia is a socialist country that has been colonized financially by the IMF and Western financial institutions since 1991.

But the fundamental foundation materially of socialist the socialist system and civilization didn't disappear overnight.

Um so for Russia to kind of return to

Uh sovereign socialism is really what we're talking about is a matter of increasingly breaking with the unipolar world order economically.

So this is the truth.

And the SMO is a big factor in jump starting Russia's development toward that end.

ACP American Chud Party.

Uh, based on what?

How are we Chuds?

Isn't the Ch aren't Chuds super pessimistic and like hate society and stuff?

Isn't that you?

When you think about it, if you're trying to total if you're at war with uh conventional

Mm, like, I don't know, uh, sexuality and norms within society.

Doesn't that make you kind of a chud sitting there being like, I hate that everyone isn't a furry?

Like, aren't you the chud when you think about it?

How are we the chud?

We literally swim among the masses like a fish swims in the sea.

So, what are you talking about?

You ever drink, not really.

Not really.

Not really.

Megacoms or chuds hate to break it to you.

Um, you're you're cattle.

You're just brainwashed by y you're not saying this because you've arrived at this conclusion through some independent device of of thought.

You are going with you're just repeating with what some Discord or Reddit made popular to say, and I d I feel bad for you.

You've you've never actually like thought about that critically.

You're just saying it because it's like a popular thing to say, basically.

Which I mean, I guess that's human nature, right?

Whatever.

Mega comms, it's like it's such an N P C take.

It's just like, well, you're just saying that 'cause it's a popular thing to say.

What's the basis of it?

Is it is there actually a foundation or basis of this claim?

It's kind of stupid.

I mean, look at look at look at our go on HCP main right now.

Look at our people.

I don't really think we're chuds.

I think you're just a little soy in Reddit yourself.

Why'd you stop posting on YouTube?

Um, because uh becoming the chairman of the Communist Party in coupled with my writings uh just totally made it impossible for me to run the YouTube channel.

I'm I'm trying to post on it again.

Kinda working on a big video project for that, but uh

Doing it with the same degree of regularity as before just became impossible.

H to be greatest chud movement.

De you know what, I'm curious.

So Deadboy Status, do you speak with a like uh Like this?

Are you neurodivergent in any way?

Or like I just don't see like the sapience or the sentience behind your contributions to the to the live stream.

I just kinda think you're like an automaton who's just repeating things over and over again.

How's it like to organize and run a Communist Party?

Um

The hardest part was like um

Thinking first the first year of it was very hard because you just had to start really no longer thinking as an individual, but mm like being really impersonal about shit.

And um

Squabbles, disputes, and stuff, you just have to really be acquire a level of patience that is inhuman, frankly.

Um n not not not normally human, really.

But how is it?

I mean, it's wonderful, it's great, it's it's a it's it's a purposeful existence.

This person saying Slava Ukraini

Uh so you're a child predator?

Got it.

Noah has a problem with MAGA communism.

Noah, what's the problem with MAGA communism?

And before you answer that, are you a Marxist-Leninist, self-proclaimed one, or are you a Trotskyite?

Because if you're a Trotskyite, I don't consider you human and I don't even care what you have to say.

Or if you're some other kind of variant of non

Communist.

Noah, what's your problem with mega communism?

Let's hear it.

I'm not above engaging you.

I'm so famous.

I understand how famous I am.

I'm not above this.

I'm looking at you directly, Noah.

I'm literally looking at you on a personal level right now.

I'm literally looking at you.

I'm literally looking at you.

Yeah.

You?

Can you explain?

Oh no, he he looked away.

Okay, it's over.

Mega oh wa what is this thing where it's like I go I go somewhere, I drop a video, I'm on TikTok, and then these automaton NPCs will just like I'm gonna poop on you with this login

Maga communism, this or that.

It's like they're what are you what do you what do you you're just kind of like

Hooping.

What are you saying?

You're just repeating with some.

You're just kind of a sheep.

Like, I don't know.

You've never thought about it yourself.

You still caught yourself a MAGA communist despite the files.

Um.

The files have led to the break between the MAGA movement and Trump that vindicates and proves that that movement was never reducible to Trump in the first place, which was the founding purport of the idea of MAGA communism, that we should try to disseminate communist consciousness among the MAGA base and not interpretive dance students and other glasses wearing parasites.

That was the basic gist of it.

Instead of the professional managerials as the base of a communist movement, let's actually go to the blue-collar working class MAGA people.

Like, that's the whole idea.

And I feel like that was very vindicated by the fact that two simultaneous political developments have occurred.

The MAGA base has shifted to anti-Zionism, broke with Trump, and is fully against the regime, basically, and ready for revolution.

Whereas the Democratic Party base has shifted more in the favor of Zionism because it has to morally justify Israel.

And it has simultaneously become doubled down on its support for the so-called NATO allies and imperialism.

So the MAGA base became anti-Zionist and anti-NATO, and the liberal Democrat base became more pro-Zionist and more pro-NATO.

Even the socialist wing, like Kate Abu Ghazala, is very much fervently pro-NATO, pro-Ukraine, and anti-one China policy.

So I think that mega communism was very much vindicated, actually.

Earth Eater, go ahead.

Hey, what's going on, man?

What's up?

I've seen you on Twitter quite a bit.

I am.

The ACP does seem pretty good.

I have to admit that communism does follow a logical train of thought.

I'm just wondering what the ACP um

Do you guys still worship niggers or what?

Oh, very funny.

I'm not it's not a joke.

It's so edgy.

It's just so edgy.

It's like, oh, I've never heard that word in my life.

I'm just traumatized.

Um

I'm gonna get you banned from TikTok.

I'm gonna get you banned.

It's funny because this is the guy who thinks he's the funny troublemaker in school.

I'm the bad kid.

You think you're a bad kid, right?

You're the bad guy.

But you're actually a snitch.

Why?

Because you're just saying these things to get me reported and get my life taken down or limited or banned.

You're not the bad, the cool bad kid.

You're a snitch.

You're a pathetic, weak snitch.

Oh, I'm so edgy and I'm so cool.

No, you're not.

You're a snitch.

If it weren't for the fact that, uh,

TikTok, you know, is gonna censor me and punish me for you saying this dumb shit.

Uh what you say would have had no reaction at all.

Nobody cares.

You just embarrass yourself and poop your own pants.

I'll I'll I'll uh I'll even level with that if you can go to black people and keep that same energy.

You can't.

When you're around black people, you start pooping your pants.

You don't you don't speak in this big way.

So don't speak that way on the internet.

Simple as that.

By the way, if you are scared of and you hate black people, I just see you as a pathetic weakling.

You're not even human to me if you uh if there's something about black people that just scares you and you can't even you're just like a p you're weak to me.

You're like a very if you give very like effeminate male energy and I just cannot respect you.

Nobody takes your party seriously.

There is no point to MAGA communism LMAO.

So, Rid, um.

What

What did you think you were doing by saying that when you typed that in the I just wanna like visualize it.

What was what's the point of what you're trying to say?

Nobody even if it was true that nobody took us seriously.

What does that have to do with whether we're correct or not?

And you're saying, well, some people have to take it seriously, correct.

How many people took the Bolsheviks seriously after the Bolshevik-Menshevik split?

Was it nineteen oh four?

Or oh seven.

I haven't slept in one day, so I'm fuzzy on dates.

During the Bolshevik-Menshevik split, how many people took the Bolsheviks seriously?

Can you tell me?

How many?

Uh was Lenin a popular or obscure figure for the majority of his life?

So these phrases, you're just announcing to the world that you're unprincipled.

You think you go with the flow, you're a cattle, and you just whatever's popular is what you believe in.

Um I never claimed that our position

is popular among the liberal left, which institutionally

uh is is disadvantages us because it gets the support from the bourgeoisie directly through billionaire money and through its connections to the Democratic Party and so on and so on.

I never said we weren't institutionally disadvantaged, even on the media space.

But

Have I ever been able to been unable to justify my position?

Of course I can justify my position.

Which is why you don't have a critique or line of attack that holds under scrutiny.

Would you call yourself a nationalist?

No.

No, actually I just said in the debate with Joey, not only am I not a nationalist, I go a step farther than Dugan does.

I believe there is a universal intelligibility of the same logos that defines civilizations.

Um, so the problem with na I can tell you the problem with nationalism.

The problem with nationalism is the same thing as the problem with bourgeois formalism because nations are a form of a revolutionary process that is itself devoid of national identity.

So, when a revolution happens within a nation, the national identity is fully suspended in a relational process that there's no identity anymore.

It's like a chaos, and that contradictory development.

is what creates nations and and gives nations the determinations that they have.

So the reason I reject nationalism is because I don't think the nation

is the cause of nations.

Just like I don't think the Platonic idos, the idea, the form, is the basis of the form.

I believe in the content.

The content is a um uh revolutionary process that fully suspends all fixed identities.

And is the real content and causal basis of?

the various diverse different civilizations and nations on earth.

So I have a proper theoretical justification for the rejection of nationalism.

Do you actually organize the working class or just post content?

Do I personally?

I'm one individual.

So I personally do not individually organize the working class.

The party that I belong to.

The American Communist Party does in fact organize the working class.

And in fact, to be frank with you, let's think about what is the paradigm.

We do that, by the way.

We absolutely show up to strikes and we try to organize workers and we do that.

We do the basics that Lenin talked about.

But the most fundamental way to organize the proletariat is to build dual power and to be an organization of preppers, basically.

That's the Mao that's the line of thinking we learn from Mao Zetong thought.

Did Mao Zedong even do what we do with the organ?

No, he didn't.

He he simply built an alternative basis of political authority and power in the P L A.

Which became the foundation of the future proletarian dictatorship.

S so that's more important to me.

But additionally, yes, we do try to organize the working class.

Costco.

I think you're one of us, are you not?

Costco?

What's up?

I am.

Yeah, what's up, man?

I've been thinking, I got this idea sticking in my head that I wanted to hear your thoughts on, but it's essentially boils down to the U.S.

government foreign policy exists right now to eliminate every single option except for World War III with China.

And then at that point, it comes down to either full-on war with China that nobody thinks we can win, or full cooperation with them.

In which case, I feel like the rallying cry of, well, they built the trains here once already, pretty strong pull of the American people.

I just kind of see that as being like a possible future.

The long-term strategy is the destruction of the CPC.

The problem the U.S.

has is not necessarily China.

Um but more specifically China's sovereignty.

Yeah.

The U.S.

CPC is a great big system that it has to align with its control.

And the CPC is outside of that control.

And that's the problem they have.

I see it more in terms of the thoughts of the American people, unless you think their individual allegiances aren't going to matter in that conflict.

But at a certain point, they won't.

They'll find a way to spin it.

The U.S.

government are masters of psychological manipulation.

They will find a way to spin.

Conflict with China.

I can see that.

I just kind of see it as like, you know, you know what?

The BAP people already do it.

They constantly posting about Chinese animal cruelty, which somehow works for many people.

Well, it works now, but as China's material conditions improve, it's working less and less, right?

The zoomers are less.

There is a total information control.

Flow of the information is controlled.

The flow of narratives are also controlled.

For now, there seems like they're wild and they're free.

But when it becomes decisive that they need the control, they'll be able to do it.

I think.

I can see it.

I think that there's going to be some pull from the people when they actually say, like, hey, decide to go die for Taiwan.

They didn't even know that.

Or we could just spend that money on.

You know, let's be realistic.

Yeah.

But anyway, thank you, man.

Appreciate it.

And by the way, you know, I'll tell you this.

I think that the moral basis.

Moral in quotes, I mean like morale wise, moral basis of and justification of US aggression against China will come from the democratic socialists.

It's not going to come from Trump.

It's going to come from kind of democratic socialists who claim that China is a capitalist, authoritarian, fascist state.

And that's what's going to make it a viable position to convince the US public.

Can you give specific examples of organizing the working class?

We're attempting to organize drayage workers who are unmisclassified proletarians.

Uh at the ports uh around the country.

We're still doing that.

We show up wherever we can to acts of labor action like strikes, sit downs and so on and so on.

We attempt wherever we can to organize ununionized, non-unionized workers and participate in that unionization.

We link up with labor organizations and labor initiatives wherever we can.

Specifics.

Okay, go to ACP Main and scroll through and you'll find plenty examples.

You're talking about specifics.

What do you mean?

Specific ports like the New Newark port or the uh the Los Angeles port in Orange County, both of which I visited personally.

And uh participated in the uh you know organizing efforts and uh in the limited capacity that I did.

Has dual power strategy ever worked in a way it's never been attempted.

How do you deal with able-bodied people that refuse to work under communism?

Um

Good question.

Uh I mean I have several answers, but

You know, the spirit of communism, which is a society that is not resting so much on the laurels of the state to enforce

and compel behavior, you're going to be talking about at the cultural level, shame.

Shame, ostracization, uh social ostracization and marginalization and shame are going to be the primary factors that prevent antisocial behavior, according to the Leninist paradigm.

Hello?

Yeah, what's up?

Like do you let them be homeless and starve them?

Um i well, no, in a in a communist society, um

Before it gets to that point, they're going to be given a headache socially.

They're not going to be able to have access to things without squaring the question of their reputation and honor and so on.

So

Sorry, go ahead, Kay.

Go ahead.

Yeah, no worries.

So I've recently come across the ACP.

I've been looking for something that's like, obviously, the leftist space has been overrun by feds and shit.

So I'm just like trying to find something that's a little bit more actual Marxist.

But I've heard you guys have like connections with like Alexander Dugan.

I don't know too much about Dugan or like Duganism.

All I hear is like what I see online, and it's all like saying he's a fascist or that's like pushing like a ultra like nationalistic kind of rhetoric.

But I was just looking if you could clarify that or explain that.

So I'll explain who Dugan is without getting too much in the intellectual side of things.

Dugan is renowned for being the theorist of multipolarity.

So he is the theorist and primary thinker within Russia who connects Russia's special military operation and global foreign policy goals with the Iranians, with the Chinese, with Venezuelans, with the whole world basically.

So Dugan is a kind of symbol of.

Opposition to the U.S.

unipolar hegemony.

And the reason that is more fundamental than leftist quote-unquote anti-imperialism is because leftist European-style anti-imperialism has been opportunistically hijacked to accuse Russia, China, Iran, and so on of being imperialist.

So, Dugan has a much more comprehensive and principled paradigm of opposition to the U.S.

unipolar world order.

This is the basis upon which he has renown and fame.

During 2016, and there was intense anxiety on the part of the U.S.

intelligence community and uh

think tanks and and so on, that Brahmins, if you will, who are witnessing the rise of populism within the US from Bernie Sanders and Trump, whatever,

And they were connecting that to the multipolar world order, and Russia specifically.

So the boogeyman of Dugan was created, that he's this dark evil wizard who's destabilizing Western democracies and promoting populisms that cut across traditional political alignments and distinctions.

Now, the reason there's a cutting across of political alignments and distinctions isn't because Dugan's a fascist who is repeating the kind of traditional fascist transcending left and right type of thing, but because the political alignment within the United States and within Europe is within the hegemony, okay?

So it's a kind of a fake two-party system, for example, Democrats versus Republicans.

And they're gerrymandered in such a way that doesn't permit real structural opposition to the machine itself.

So Dugan is associated with this kind of chaotic populism that is just disrupting conventional politics.

Of course, it's not true, but it was a thing created by a CIA-employed thinker, researcher, named Alexander Reed Ross.

He created the Dugan scare and the Nosbowl scare.

Okay.

So that's who's the source of it, is a CIA guy, Alexander Reid Ross.

He created the entire boogeyman or uh status around Dugan.

That status accelerated Dugan's fame, intensified it and um led several people like myself to to try and study and understand Dugan.

So, I have engaged with Dugan's thinking, and Dugan's thinking is a source of influence for me, but I remain a Marxist and a Marxist-Leninist.

Um.

Okay.

But people think that if you're a Marxist, you're a Marxist-Leninist, you can't engage with 21st century thinkers.

You have to confine yourself to the to two things, the canon of Marxist-Leninist literature and Judith Butler's queer theory and transgender theories that come out of French and American universities in the 1980s and 1990s.

So I reject that.

I think we can engage with any th thinker we want, and it's our duty as Marxists, actually.

That's a really respectable position.

I appreciate your answer, sir.

You have a great rest of your day.

Thank you.

Alright guys, I think we're gonna wrap up.

Are live.

Hope everyone had a wonderful and great time.

And we're wrapping it up.

Guys, this is such easy content, I can literally do it like.

Every time I don't have content on stream, I could just do this instead.

Straight up.

It's like such easy content.

What do you guys think?

Is this like easy good content for like whenever I just need to end the stream or something?

But we'll see guys, we'll see.

Uh anyway guys, if you're gonna drop a you know, if you're gonna drop some subs, then you should wait because I'm literally about to end the stream right now.

So totally don't be dropping subs.

After I end the stream.

Watch out that you don't milk TikTok dry.

You know what's funny is that if I do it consistently, I'll actually grow on the algorithm on TikTok.

I just need to do it consistently and I'll just keep growing there.

Um and I think little by little it's making look guys, put it this way, the the the X spaces I think are much less effective than this.

In fact, I may do the confront the chairman on ti on TikTok next time, uh because it's just so much more effective.

And X spaces you don't get

The broad spectrum X Spaces, you get all sorts of random foreigners and stuff and it's just kind of nonsense.

Anyway guys, uh

Scotty, thank you.

We'll appreciate it.

Okay guys, I hope you had

Good stream.

We're gonna wrap it up.

Bye-bye.

See you guys.

See you guys Thursday.