US IRAN INVASION BEINGS | HEATED DEBATES!

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.

Oh, la Cosmosse Jinping.

Allah, God was S&Jing thing.

God,

Cosmos, Jid,

Ping,

Allah, God, God, The cosmos is big, all the cosmos is bright.

The star is bright, horizon red, the blade is swift, and horses tread.

Allah moscow sea in bay, Allah was must be made, Allah was must be Godosmos will be Allah Cosmos

City Him God

God God

God God

God God

God God

God God God God God God God God

God God

God God God

God Godosmos Heimbi Allah Mosulsi Nipi

Allah

God God God God God God God revolutionary dynasty

On the cosmos

day

Allah

Cosmosby

today

A lot of Ponsonsi Dendy Mug

Mawr

Pondon

Mug

Pondon Pond Pond The Babylonismuchy Alawful Mephyi

Atauptu Kyi

Alauptu Kyi

Inche

Ala

Alau Kyi

Inche Ara

Povovti in

Fight The Earth has belong to linen's fight the earth has turned and within light allah cosmosh sitting training allah cosmos hitting hang allah postman God bless you in pain Allah God blessesied

day

Allah Allah

God bless my God

Yeah all yahayayayayayay hey hey hey hey hey oh yeah yeah hey yeah yeah oh yeah Allah Allah Allah Allah God

God

Mossey

Jain

God

Mosch

God God God God God God God God God God God

God God God God God God God, God, God. God. God.

God.

God.

God.

God.

God.

God.

God.

God. God.

God.

God.

God.

God.

God. God, God, Oh my my my L'O

L'O

N'A OOOOO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh The star is big. Allah cosmos Egypt big.

The star is bright, horizon red, the blade is swift, and horses tread.

Oh, Allah was machine in pain, Allah was must be God Godosmoses, God, God,

God,

God,

God,

God,

God, God,

God,

God,

God,

God, God,

God, God,

God,

God, God, God, God, Godosmoschini Allah cross must be

God

God

God's way

for us to

He Your revolutionary

dynasty Leth Revolutionary Dynasty

God

God

Cosmos' Day

God

God

God God God God God God God God God God

God God God God God From Allopos

From Babylon

To lay

Inns fight The earth has turned I belong to Lenin's fight

The earth has turned and within my

All the post postings trading

Allah postings thing

Allah post machine kidding Allah Allah God God God God

God

God God

for season thing

Hey

Yeah

Yahya Yeah

Yeah

Yeah

Yeah

Yeah Yeah Yeah Yeah all right allahy allahyaheehs

Allah Osmosied in place God, yeah, yeah, hey. Allah cosmos is

pain.

Allah cosmos

hidden

Big.

Allah cosmos

city and

God

God God

God God

God

God God

God God, I'm A lot I'm

A lot

I'm I'm I'm I'm God God, Allah,

and

I'm not

my and

I'm

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, Allah cosmos

jimping,

Allah

Cosmosi jimping

Ollah

cosmos

jim ping

Allah cosmos

jimpe

Jamb

Rang the cross most changing big Oh

Oh

Yeah is bright a horizon and the I don't know my face and

a lot

I'm and no my and

I'm

I'm

I'm and the other people and the other

I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm

a lot of I'm a so so

I'm not

I'm going

I'm I'm I'm gonna go to the I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm a I'm I'm going to be what I'm going to be. and the uh...

and

I'm and

I'm and the I think and a

I'm

a

I'm and and the other people and the other

and the other

I'm a

God

and

I'm a and

I'm

and I'm and I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm uh, uh,

uh,

Uh,

uh, I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm not I'm not I'm going to be able to be. I'm what is up

what is up drama nation

we've got a lot to talk about today first of all i want to say that uh this is not clickbait

there's actually solid evidence showing that the ground invasion more or less has begun i will get

more to that in a second the implications uh what that's going to mean for us in our party, because this is going to actually be a point of no return in my view. I think it's a very serious moment. I'll tell you directly where I got my intel from, it's from Jackson.

And yeah, so we're going to get into that.

Second of all, for the second half of the stream,

for the second half of the stream,

I'm going to be doing the TikTok debates again, and not even debates, just education. Why? Because I stream for five hours Sunday, which is a lot. Because I genuinely enjoyed it. I enjoyed being on TikTok, having no pressure at all,

and just being able to talk to the idiots in my, I'm not one of these celebrities, these

ye celebrities who are above interacting with the lowest, most irrelevant fucking retard.

And I like the discourse. I like it. I like being able to just have a free platform to educate and to push back and to debate these things.

So in the second half of the stream, we're going to be doing that again.

And ones if you're excited for that, by the way.

Anyway, guys, not that this is a fucking democracy.

Okay, so I'm just going to stop delaying it and tell you directly what's happening.

Okay.

So Trump is claiming that there's negotiations going on between Whitkoff and the Iranians. I believe that was denied by the Iranians. However, it seems like the talks of negotiations are ongoing. This is caffeine by the way this is chamomile tea actually

because I need to fucking sleep

anyway

I also need my shirt to be fucking tailored anyway guys no more swearing

look trump is sending the eleventh me u 31st m u 82nd, 82nd Airborne Division.

3,900 infantry in total with 3,900 support.

Two amphibious ready groups,

including air support, warships,

sub, and land recon equipment.

One is coming from Okinawa,

which is already departed, and it is set to reach its

destination this Saturday. The other one has just left from San Diego. Very serious business.

So let me tell you what the plan is.

They plan on taking the southeast part of Iran,

which has two fully-kitted ports,

one international airport,

that they're going to use to deploy an additional 3,000 members

of these 82nd Airborne Division.

There isn't another airport within 600 kilometers of chabahar which is where they plan on landing it's surrounded by dry land, desert. There's only three roads into there.

So Iranian defensive deployments, at least in conventional defensive deployments, will not be able to deter this kind of invasion. And I want to show you a map so you understand exactly what I'm talking about

this is set to happen this weekend by the way

and they're all the reason the invasion started

the reason I'm saying that is because they're already on the way.

They are already on the way, okay?

I want to show you a few maps of Iran, okay?

So let me show you this first all right uh this is so confusing i'm not going to show you this one because this implies that India has something to do with this, which...

Fuck, I really... Every fucking map is of India. Like anyone gives a shit about India.

All right, hold on. Let me just get this very low-res piece of shit map.

That doesn't even show borders.

It's quite incredible, actually.

It's quite incredible.

They don't have any good maps.

Here we go.

One map.

There we go.

All right.

Here. Okay. So this is the port. Chabahar port. Okay. And notice something. They don't have to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. They don't have to spend a lot of time in the,

near Oman.

They don't have to spend a lot of time in the Gulf of Oman.

They're just going to land here.

They're going to get their ground equipment, ground troops there.

They're going to seize control of the international airport,

which they're going to use to bring in more deployments and more ground troops.

And we're looking at a full-fledged ground invasion full-fledged ground invasion

now if you don't know where this is i want to show you what's significant about this this is in the baluchistan region so undoubtedly the

plans of the united states are to do something similar to what they did with the kurds in iraq

is they're going to try to enlist the baluch tribes to join them in the ground invasion of Iran and enlist them for support.

The Balochistan separatists.

So to translate all of this for you it's happening okay

i'll give you some additional information

two to three million baluchis are there

that they're planning on recruiting

actually the the eleventh emu from san diego that they're planning on recruiting.

Actually, the 11th M.E.U from San Diego was deployed a few days ago.

And they're going to be deployed to the golf bases first.

And I want to give you an idea about how this could potentially go and what we could be looking at here. Okay. First of all, if anyone thinks it's so over and this is going to be an easy march through Iran,

I want to give you a picture of Iran's topography a little bit. So Balochistan is itself pretty mountainous with some natural defensive barriers, but to the northwest of Balochistan, you have very difficult to maneuver natural defensive barriers,

which undoubtedly play into the hands to the advantage of the Islamic Republic.

However, I think the United States probably does have the capacity to take control over this region and establish air superiority and just occupy it, at least in the beginning for a period.

Do I think that they're going to be able to take Tehran in two

weeks like they took Baghdad in two weeks during Desert Storm? No, I don't think that's going to be

possible. And that's why I'm really sharing this with you. I'm not a fucking news anchor. I'm not a news reporter. I'm not a war

correspondent. I'm sharing this to you because if this actually happens, we are going to look at a

conflict that could potentially last at the very bare minimum on the most

conservative side of things six months if it lasts six months that is six months of the

strait of war moves continuing to be closed.

And the world economy cannot afford that.

The American economy can't afford that.

The global oil markets cannot afford that.

And we are looking at something that directly has an impact to our party.

Our national Congress is supposed to be this October.

If this goes on, how are our people going to afford plane tickets to go to the National Congress?

That's such a stupid, superficial concern in the grand scheme of things.

But it just goes to show you it directly has relevance, even for our plans as a party, right?

And if it has plans for us as a party, of course, this is going to shut down the American economy.

The U.S. cannot afford

a war with Iran, a ground war with Iran

for six months. I don't think it can.

I think that we're on the cusp

of some major civil unrest

in this country, some major

political unrest, and a scenario of a ground invasion of Iran that is lasting longer than two weeks, longer than the promised four to five weeks, which wasn't even supposed to be a boots on the ground, ground invasion. That was never even planned.

These are the circumstances and conditions that are going to give rise to that second American Civil War we have always been talking about here.

And so it directly

has relevance for us, guys.

This is very serious.

And the fact that you know it's a blind

alley is that first of all, Trump admitted

in a press conference that they had no idea

Iran was going to start targeting the golf bases.

And they had the expectation that by decapitating the leadership of Iran with Khomeini, that that would be the end of it similar to the non-lethal decapitation of the leadership of Venezuela.

However, Iran is not Venezuela, and things didn't go as they expected it to.

And now we're facing a scenario and a situation where the U.S. is gearing up because it has no choice, by the way, for a protracted conventional, well, hybrid war when you think about it, but ground war with the Islamic Republic that will last a long time, a very long time. And the more, and that

obviously is to the benefit of the Islamic regime in the long haul, Islamic Republic, I should

rather say, in the long haul. Benefits the say, in the long haul.

Benefits the Islamic Republic in the long haul.

We're certain.

But most certainly is going to be an ugly conflict, for sure.

MF villain, what's going on, man?

Appreciate you.

Few things to point out for consideration.

One.

The nature of war has changed. In addition to the fact that Iran is not Iraq, for it, just because of its topography alone, to say nothing of the fact that the Islamic Republic is infinitely more advanced than the Ba'athist state that existed in Iraq.

We are in an era of drone warfare. I know what's going on on the front lines in Donbass and in the Ukraine war.

Russia borders Ukraine, and the front barely moves.

It's almost unmovable.

The United States doesn't border Iran.

It has to go through this extremely convoluted strategy, you know, just to land troops there.

What do you think it's going to look like when Iran launches thousands, tens of thousands, cheap Chinese FPV drones to absolutely cause chaos

and a complete breakdown of control for the occupation of Belochistan by the U.S. ground forces.

At this point, the United States, I understand Russia is much less brutal than the United States is.

I understand Russia will not go to the lengths the U.S. might be willing to go to.

But understand something about the nature of war.

Okay, war is always about morale.

That's the only factor that's relevant for warfare.

If you have an army of brave people who don't care about their lives but are so dedicated to the cause that they're going to just basically throw their lives away, then you don't have the same problems the U.S. military does, okay?

The problem with the U.S. military is that when you have operated a base of operations

and you've occupied territory for the furtherance of U.S. military

operations, there's a need to, there's an kind of operational paradigm, security paradigm, that's in in place where there's no tolerance for chaos, meaning they have to secure airspace and they have to have a degree of security with respect to the safety of personnel before they are comfortable

proceeding with the expansion of operations. If FPV drones are just constantly bombing and

taking out and killing U.S. soldiers and disrupting operations,

the expansion

of operations is just not going to be possible

at the level of a...

the expansion of a ground war.

If you're a fanatical army

that doesn't give a fuck,

and you'll keep marching while you get picked off one by one,

there's a drone here there, you won't give a fuck, you'll keep marching,

because, you know, you don't need that level of control necessarily.

You just kind of say, al-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-hack-h you just march in,

and you continue doing what you're doing,

knowing that there's maybe a 5-15, 30- 30% chance you're going to be killed. But you keep doing it anyway, because you put the cause first.

Okay, but if there's a 2% to 5% chance that, you know, U.S. soldiers are going to be blown up,

they're not going to take the risk.

Do you understand?

So just the usage of asymmetrical drone warfare on the part of the iranian similar to what's going on in the ukraine war actually

will be enough to severely halt and deter and disrupt

u.s military operations by way of a ground invasion and a ground war.

So this is the situation we're looking at. Thank you. So we are looking at a scenario. Why is this relevant?

Because the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed.

For no other reason than the fact that if the united states has to move

defensive military infrastructure for the interception of drones and missiles and so on to the

balochistan region which is going to be a pretty long-term base of

operations for a pretty long-term protracted ground war invasion. This will leave the Gulf

States defenseless. The United States has already moved the Patriot Systems from South Korea to the Gulf States.

Who's to say they're not going to have to move those same Patriot Systems to Balochistan if they mount a ground invasion?

The Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed. Not only that, but the movement of U.S. military personnel here is going to leave the Gulf states highly vulnerable.

If I were the Iranians, I would not, and you know what, I'm so worried that this is

going to happen, actually. If I were the Iranians, I would not bother with basing my hostility toward the Gulf states on whether or not they're hosting U.S. military personnel.

If U.S. military personnel evacuate the Gulf states and all move to a ground invasion in Balochistan, Iran could still use a now more defenseless Gulf GCC community

as leverage to actually blackmail the United States. Just bomb the shit out of the

Emirates, bomb the shit out of the Saudis, bomb the shit out of the Qataris, and the United States will panic.

Why? Because you're looking at the centers of the global oil markets and the lynchpins of the entire global U.S. economic system at large.

The Iranians are smart, which I believe they are, they will not

stop their hostilities toward the Gulf states. They'll continue bombing Gulf states

throughout this entire ground invasion, which they should.

Of course they should.

But this is what's now happening.

Now, there is a slight chance, and I don't even want to entertain this outcome or possibility that negotiations go through and sellouts and traders within the Islamic Republic prevail, like in Venezuela, and that's that.

That's the only way that the ladder of escalation doesn't climb higher.

So there are two vectors going on right now.

One vector is in the direction of world revolution.

The other vector is in the direction of a long-term postponement of that same world revolution and an era of global reaction, so to speak, setting in. There is a direct line between the U.S. ground invasion of Iran and world revolution.

Because the longer that conflict continues, the longer the Strait of Hormuz continues to be closed, the longer that insurance

companies will no longer cover the cost of travel for commercial vessels to traverse the

Strait of Hormuz, we're looking at a worldwide energy crisis. And given the fact that we're basically already in a worldwide

economic crisis a worldwide energy crisis will accelerate the vectors of political instability and

social unrest in every single state on earth, besides a few, like China and DPRK and so on.

But this is going to absolutely turn the world upside down, including the world of the United States itself domestically.

We're going to be looking at a situation of unprecedented domestic civil unrest in the United States itself.

I went to the pump the other day and gas was $4.5.

What's the price of gas in your local area?

Everyone tell me right now.

Just go ahead.

Type the price of gas in your area.

Mine was $4.4.5.

$3.99, $350, $5.799, $4.95. $3.99. $350. $5.79. $3. Where the fuck are you, Texas? $6. $6. It must be California, right?

$5.90. Where the fuck do you guys live? shit 334 wow 550 uh southern washington is 550 wow okay so that's already happening

that's already happening. That's already happening. Now, what happens when gas goes up to $6 in the Midwest?

Fuck it. What happens when gas goes to $8 anywhere in the country? What happens when gas reaches $10 in the United States of America?

Well, that's just about the threshold that I would say is the fuck this threshold for the U.S. population, meaning fuck this.

It's the 4th of July. Bring out the

fireworks. We don't give a fuck anymore.

We're going to chimp out.

The rednecks

will take fireworks and just blow up

the world. They'll blow up everything.

Kmart is going to fall.

McDonald's will fall.

I just think that's kind of the...

If it gets $10 a gallon, just imagine that.

People are just going to say,

fuck this.

It's going to be a fuck this moment.

Someone's going to go to the pump.

It's going to be $10 a gallon.

They're going to grab gasoline,

barrels of gasoline.

What are they fucking called?

Holy shit.

You know, they're going to,

canisters of gasoline. This gasoline this just start blowing shit up

fuck this i have to go to my stupid fucking job i'm tired as fuck

gross by the way if there's an energy crisis that means the price of food goes up too.

People are going to be fucking pissed, and they're going to say, fuck this shit.

And there was one fuck this shit moment in the history of recent and the recent history of the United States of America, which was 2020 because of the COVID

lockdowns. I don't care how many of these people were liberals who cared about Black Lives Matter

objectively. Did the entire country start blowing up Target and McDonald's?

Because they cared so much about George Floyd?

No, nobody cared about George Floyd.

Everyone said, fuck this, because they were sick of the disruption.

The disruption of everyday life started making them realize

how, like, retarded and shitty life

in general in this country is,

and how irrational and torturous it is. And it was the fuck this shit moment

that led to the explosion of targets and McDonald's everywhere. And an energy crisis is going to cause a level of social instability that I would say is far more intense than the lockdowns were.

Because the lockdowns at least permitted people with the ability to sit home,

watch Netflix, order Uber Eats

with the Trump stimulus checks

that they were given, and everyone

was kicking back chilling.

And that still

caused them

a huge degree

of aggravation

and social anxiety

of social anxiety

civilizational anxiety

and you know uh just grievance okay so it that that fucked shit up

that was a fuck this shit moment okay so we are looking at another fuck this shit moment in

the united states this year probably.

I think I know the nature of human beings.

I know the nature of my fellow Americans.

If in the Midwest somebody goes to the gas pump and it's $8 a gallon,

people will start shooting guns in the sky

and like straight up

just fucking fuck this shit.

They're gonna just start smashing

and ramming their cars into shit

and they're just gonna fucking lose their mind

and get so pissed.

And it's gonna to be a breakdown of...

And that's going to create, in my opinion.

I want to be a fortune teller here.

I'm the new professor, Jung.

Okay, so Iran, Iran.

So the mountains here in Iran are noticed because the Gnostics and the Sabatian Jews have conversated in these mountains that, all right no i'll just give you a what i consider

a reasonable prediction right my very reasonable prediction is going to be that the massive

degree of irrational meaningless social unrest that happens as a consequence of the forthcoming energy crisis, provided that this ground invasion happens, is going to be responded to politically in the form of a division of the House, quite literally, the House

divided at the level of Washington, D.C.

Democrats will point the fingers

at Trump, Republicans

will point the fingers at Democrats,

and that is when

we're going to really start seeing the constitutional

crisis that's already underway, by the way, intensify into something that could potentially be an armed conflict of some kind.

Social unrest is violent by nature. It's bound to happen that it's going to lead to people killing each other in some

capacity. That's spilling over into a, like, intra-regime conflict of some kind. National Guard versus

police versus conventional military, yadaada yada very possible it's

absolutely very possible there's already a constitutional crisis underway and if i don't know who's

who's forgotten this but the midterm elections

are this year.

And we're looking

at a population that

is very disillusioned with both

the Democrats and the Republicans

at this point.

Trump's former base, they are not having it. Nobody buys and the Republicans at this point.

Trump's former base, they are not having it.

Nobody buys these narratives.

Nobody's cheerle. There's about, I think Dugan was right.

About 15% of the U.S. population is cheerleading what's going on.

And then 15% are, you know, sorry, 50% are Democrats.

They're, they are divided themselves.

35% are the MAGA Tucker Carlson fans, okay?

And, um... Carlson fans. Okay. And

and we're all the

I don't know if any of this

is planned. I don't know if this is part of some long-term

agenda. I couldn't tell you that. Carlos,

what's up, man? I couldn't tell you if this was part of a long-term agenda or not,

but what I could tell you is that the foundations and the basis and the seeds are being laid, more or less,

and I mean this very seriously for

the U.S. Civil War

this is how it happens

you just have an

you have an energy crisis

which we cannot afford

as a society we don't have the morale or the resolve.

We're not, you know, we're really just, the reason, everyone's so on edge in this country, but the reason people are domesticated is a few things. Alcohol, video games, pornography,

you know, some small degree of small comforts that people find. but when that becomes impossible

when people can't even fucking afford

to commute to work anymore

um

yeah people are going to be ready to just start popping off and just say, it's going to be the fuck this moment.

Okay.

It's going to be the fuck this moment.

We are not a society unified by any morale that will have us in dur can you can anyone does anyone

want to laugh at the idea of that they i want you to think about something okay just think about

something for one second i want you to laugh a little bit

because the idea is just

kind of fucking funny right

you have

I gotta tailor my fucking shirt man

this is whatever

who gives shit?

Look,

you have the Iranians who've been living under

crippling sanctions for decades.

You have the Cubans that have been living

under the world's most sadistic embargo for how many years?

Does anyone know the amount of years? It's been exactly.

Minimum 60? Yeah, 60. minimum 60

yeah 60

60 years of embargo

that the Cuban people have been suffering

fuck

sorry

I'm motivated by rage right now.

And when this shit stops working,

it's gonna set me off.

That's gonna be my fuck you moment.

All right?

It's gonna be my fuck you moment.

You understand?

My fuck this moment.

Anyway, uh, I fuck this moment. Anyway,

I have intense...

I'm always in control.

Understand that even when I have rage

and I spurg out,

I'm totally in control

the whole fucking time.

That's why I'm so deadly.

Do you understand?

But the Koreans have been suffering worse conditions maybe than the Cubans.

So Iranians, Cubans, Koreans of the DPRK, what do they all have in common?

They have the morale to endure it.

They've come together as a society and they said, this is our collective, you know,

collective hardship that we're going to endure together and make meaning out of together.

And we have this solidarity together that we're in it together and we're going to endure and we're going to survive and yada, yada, yada.

Now, I want you to laugh a little bit.

Can you imagine, imagine Trump going on TV and saying

guys hard times ahead

but all Americans

lock arms together and just

endure it and

we're here in solidarity.

The wicked Iranians are doing to this.

And then go out on the street and start singing.

The Iatong is doing this.

And it's like everyone come together and just

experience this breakdown

of life

and like have this reinforce

the regime narrative that Iran is the bad

guy and we'll beat them.

Don't worry. We'll beat the Ayatollah.

It'll be like the commercials for Halo 3, right?

We got to finish the fight.

The covenant.

We're, oh my God, we're losing so much.

The covenant needs to be defeated.

And then, like, I'll tell you, you know who's gonna...

You know who that narrative is gonna appeal to?

Mentally retarded army recruits

who go on TikTok...

You know those stupid fucking fed TikToks?

For

um, like

17 year old retards who like glorify

the military because they played a lot of hell divers.

And it's like, it'll show the footage

of the U.S. aircraft carriers and it'll

play the song. I'll be like,

Yo ho.

You know what I'm talking about?

Because I'm laughing, because I'm

laughing, because I'm thinking of the logo tweet.

Because Logo said something about how

the U.S. military is like a bunch of fucking cornball,

like, epic bacon. Like, they have the fucking finely trimmed

beards with the glasses and like the the

Lumberjack shirts they hit epic bacon

It's like the corn just kind of military cornball shit you know what I mean the new metal

Yo ho. Hoistumbera.

And they're like, don't fuck with the U.S. military, man.

We're so powerful.

You see those TikToks.

Yeah, like Matt Walsh. Yeah, so you guys know what I'm, so you

I'm just like, this is like, uh, military cornball shit, right? Um, yeah, black rifle coffee, military

cornball shit. Okay, though, there's going to be 5% of the

population

who go outside

with candles

and they're like,

Iran did this to us,

but we will unite

and persevere.

It's like gas is $12.

Electricity doesn't work.

Nobody, people are eating canned food

and they're literally shooting

and killing each other. And then the 5%

corn balls, they're going to go outside

with candles. Come on, guys,

let's unite. We'll get it together. Let's be Patriots.

Okay, the joke is over.

But can you fucking imagine how ridiculous

that scenario would be to even think about?

It's not going to happen.

Like, we're not the Cuba. We're not, we're not North Korea.

We're not Iran. The minute, there's a disruption of normal life, people are going to start,

there's six, what is it, 700 million guns in circulation in this country.

They're going to take out their AR-15s, take out their guns, just going to start shooting everywhere.

Not even each other necessarily, just everywhere.

And it's going to, you know, there's going to be some stray bullets here or there.

And people are just going to start blowing shit up, burning shit, killing each other, and fucking lose their minds.

The minute, the minute, the minute that life as usual is disrupted in this way.

The minute the...

Look, can you think about this for a second?

Most third world countries...

I don't know if it's just say most.

A lot of third world countries, they don't have 24-hour electricity.

Is there any region of the United States of America

where the population could tolerate

not having 24 hours of

electricity for a very, very long time.

Well, we've seen it with natural

disasters,

but whenever

it's a natural disaster,

there's never anything to blame.

You just say, oh, we'll just blame the natural disaster.

And then people start to then realize the government's to blame because where's our taxes going?

They're not helping us.

But when people realize that this energy crisis and they're like, they're not getting 24-hour

electricity anymore because of Trump's retarded invasion of Iran, people are going to really get pissed and very angry, violently angry at the U.S. government.

Like, very, very angry.

And I don't, I don't think we can, we can handle it as a society. I just don't think we can

handle it as a society. I just don't.

And that's what you really have to, if you want to take away something about this ground invasion for the domestic, what does it mean domestically for us?

For us in America?

What does it mean?

You know, take away the following fact.

We can't afford it as a society.

We simply cannot, will not be able to afford it so uh we have to start preparing okay? I think we'll know more definitively by the weekend.

How this is going to go, we're going to know by the week's end.

And the weekend, but also the week's end.

That's when we're going to get a clearer idea of and the weekend, but also the week's end.

That's when we're going to get a clearer idea of, you know, what trajectory, what kind of vector we're going to be on.

Who knows, maybe there's going to be negotiations and it all ends, you in a week we're coming up on the

three to four to five week deadline

that Trump announced at the beginning

all of this of all this by the

way

and uh

preppers let's prepare

what if there's a draft

orvo what a wonderful question

what if there's a draft

that I cannot

answer

uh in any public capacity, and I won't.

So I'll just smile and stare at the camera.

So that's it, really.

So, yeah, that's my answer.

But apparently they're extending the draft age, potential draft age, if they do a draft to 42, from 34 to 42 years old and they are removing the prohibition on people who have a record of marijuana offenses pretty serious it's going to be like ukraine they're going to be they're going to be trying to draft a lot of old people.

Let me tell you something. If there is a draft that is successful, you are going to have a considerable portion of the military-aged male population in this country who will get combat and operational combat military experience and access to military infrastructure that will accompany their deep hatred and resentment for the U.S.

regime.

And they will bring all their skills and experience back home with them and all of the access

and know-how, back-end access to U.S. military infrastructure.

They're going to bring all that back home.

And that would very much make a revolution possible in ways that it currently is not. So, I mean, there's no way...

That would very much intensify everything I'm talking about.

To such an extent that I don't even

need a smile at the camera or anything.

I mean, it's by itself, it's going to cause problems.

For sure.

We are definitely looking

at something which

there's no off ramp

and I keep emphasizing this every stream that I talk about

this conflict and I talk about this issue

you know

which is the absence of an off ramp.

Is my mic still working?

It's giving me an error.

Still working, still working.

We're good.

We're good, We're good. We're good. Okay.

My back is fucking killing me.

Shit.

Don't worry, guys. It's all good. We're all good.

So, there's no off-ramp because if the United States withdraws, it will have had to do so under Iran's terms and conditions because Iran is not going to stop until the U.S. is gone from the region.

And if the United States accepts the terms that Iran is demanding, then that's the end of the U.S. Empire.

And even if somehow, this

is able to end without that happening,

the U.S. will never

recover from having shown the world

that Iran

was able to stand up to it.

It's another factor people don't understand.

Short of a comprehensive regime change, there is no recovery, or there's no way to save

face for the United States, because it accomplished

literally nothing. Literally nothing. I want you to think about that. From all of this,

what did the United States accomplish so far? Nothing. There is no victory Trump can bring back

home. And it's not as though there's a gray area between victory and defeat here.

He either comes home a winner or he comes home a loser.

And if he comes home now, he comes home a fucking loser. And if he comes home now, he comes home a fucking loser. Not only will this disgrace Trump

forever in the eyes of the U.S. conventional politics, this is going to destroy the prestige of the

United States Empire around the world forever.

Way more, by the way, than Iraq and Afghanistan did.

And I'll tell you why.

The United States left Afghanistan because it could no longer afford to occupy Afghanistan.

The United States left Iraq for the same reason.

But the United States is getting its fucking ass kicked with conventional ballistic missiles.

Its bases are being terrorized and bombed.

By the way, in Iraq itself, Victoria base was just evacuated.

Thousands of U.S. military personnel evacuated one of the largest bases the U.S.

has in the Middle East because of the Iraqi militias and

popular security forces, mobilization

forces.

And Iran

is humiliating the United States

through the use of sophisticated military

hardware. Not through a bunch of sophisticated military hardware. Not

through a bunch of guerrillas in the mountains

with AK-47s and RPGs

harassing an occupation

that just is too costly.

This is like the U.S. is getting

its ass kicked in a far more

conventional military

sense.

So if it leaves now, there's no off-ramp

like there was in Afghanistan and Iraq

as far as the prestige of the global

U.S. Empire.

How is the U.S.

going to beat its chest at China ever again after this? That's the real question you have to ask. How is the United States going to beat its chest and talk a big game to China or Russia ever again after this.

If much comparatively smaller Iran was able to cause it this much trouble, it's over.

This will be the end of Pax Americana.

It's the beginning of the end of the U.S. Empire.

And this is a matter of objective fact, not opinion, by the way.

This is fact.

This is 100% fact

PMF is hitting positions in Syria

that I have not seen any confirmation of or

evidence for.

Let me check my trusted news source.

Fucking translation doesn't

work on desktop. Great.

Yeah, I don't even know what the fuck anything says okay let me see let me see i'll check right now i'll check that right now. I might have the ability. You know, I don't know. Bill Fo, what's up? All right, let me try to see if you're, if I can confirm what you're saying about Syria.

Okay, there's a recent missile attack against the Zionist entity that I could show you.

I'm not going to show it to you because there's no strike.

Okay, another swarm of drones on Saudi Arabia 30 minutes ago.

Explosions shaking Bahrain right now.

According to Axios, I'll give you some updates.

Axios says that Iran informed mediators that it was deceived by Trump twice and it won't be deceived the third time.

So regarding those who are putting their bets on the negotiations panning out, I wouldn't quite count on it, to be honest.

Explosion shake Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Canadian Energy Minister, the world is facing the biggest disruption in energy supplies in history.

The Canadian Energy Minister is repeating what I just told you right now.

So anyone who says I'm kooky and I'm crazy for saying this,

you need to understand this is some very serious shit.

Dron attacks are ravaging Kuwait Saudi Arabia missile strike from Iran toward Israel

Israel's been getting hit a few times

Iraqi resistance is destroying American radars and helicopters at the

Victoria base at the capital Baghdad, which has, by the way, been evacuated. uh floods tornadoes syria and iraq in the coming days. What the hell?

So I don't know where you're getting the Syria thing. I can't find anything about Syria.

Global oil prices have exceeded $104 a barrel as of five days ago.

Yeah, this is fucking crazy.

Um... Um Cyprus demands a new security agreement regarding British bases after Iran's targeting of British bases.

The American base in Victoria has been getting pummeled in Iraq, by the way.

A lot of people don't know this.

The Iraqi resistance are hitting them hard. You know, yeah the source for uh oil is eighty nine dollars well i'm reporting from what was at seven or 6 p.m., so I don't know.

Couldn't tell you.

I don't know where you're getting the Syria thing.

That'd be crazy.

Iraq, I always knew of course the Iraqi resistance would join the war.

I know that.

Of course I know that.

Why do you think Iran

has been supporting the

Iraqi militias so aggressively

for decades

so that they wouldn't help in an event like this, of course.

And the killing of Kham and I was just, I mean, it was just outrageous to Shias around the entire region, you know, for whom he was a religious leader.

They're religious leader. They're Marja.

Although, you know, technically there's local Marjahs and all this kind of stuff.

But a lot of, for a lot of people, Kham and I was a guy.

So... so yeah we're looking at a pretty

grim

grim scenario

you know as far as

Scott Ritter said Iran has

a thorium nuke

yeah

yeah

can we just like

there's just like

slop just slop just slop yeah can we just like this is the

slop just slop

just stop

just total slop

could Iran hit

the American Navy

before they even reach Iranian soil

that I couldn't tell you I don't know

I'm not a I have no fucking idea.

Those ships that are coming for the ground invasion are equipped, themselves equipped,

with missile defense systems.

That much I know.

Now, could Iran hit them with hypersonics?

Probably.

I don't know.

But they are equipped with defensive air defense systems on board.

So, yeah, I mean, we're looking at some serious, serious...

Serious escalation is happening.

Okay, rockets were launched from Mosul, targeting the U.S. base in northeastern Syria. Got you.

I didn't know that base was still... Never mind.

Yeah, they can't hit moving targets, right?

That makes sense.

Well, look, if the ground invasion happens, you're going to see FPV drones footage with cameras attached on them blowing up American soldiers.

We're going to see. The American public is going to see that. So that's pretty

Pretty serious.

Pretty serious, actually. Pretty serious. Pretty serious, actually. Pretty serious. Pretty very real. Very real. Thank you. You know, what the hell

is this guy talking about the same thing

this is from 11 hours ago you know at least my screw up so

who the who the first of all who is this guy justin taylor

can anyone tell me if this is a...

Is this a koffer or is this a decent guy or is he a coffer?

You know, at least my screw-ups don't cost half a billion dollars.

Right now, the U.S. Navy is facing a problem.

How to reopen the straight of war moves against Iranian attacks while protecting civilian

cargo tanks.

This shitty version of Chris Cabb...

I don't know who the fuck that is.

It's like, who the fuck is this guy?

You're like,

oh, he's CIA. All right.

But good news, the U.S. Navy spent billions designing a ship to fight this kind of fight in this kind of geography against this kind of enemy.

Bad news. It is quite possibly one of the worst ships we have

ever built. And also, for some reason, we literally just move them

from the Middle East,

you know, the place where all the fighting is right now,

to a random port in Malaysia.

Today we are going to be talking about the independence class,

Littoral.

And this is some CIA diversion tactics nonsense.

Okay. Complete fucking... complete fucking diversion

diversionary nonsense You know, The This is what psychological collapse looks like.

Israeli and U.S. strikes hit Medabad airport in Tehran and destroyed at least 17 aircraft on the ground.

And Iran's response was to pile every vehicle they could find all over the airport, especially on

runway 29R. Fire trucks, ground support equipment, baggage carts, anything with wheels got dragged

onto the tarmac. You only do this when you're afraid someone is going to land troops on it.

Iran watched what happened in Iraq in 2003. On April 3rd,

the U.S. Army's 3rd Infantry Division seized Saddam International Airport on the western edge of Baghdad.

Within days the city had fallen. Medabad sits in the same position for Tehran that Baghdad International sat for Baghdad, right on the edge of the capital, big enough to land anything.

So they're filling it with anything they can get their hands on.

This is what psychological collapse looks like.

That was five days ago.

If true. Which you don't even know if it can be Remember when Trump said 48 hours and they're going to strike the power plants and then that didn't happen?

It's just like losing face constantly on Trump's part. trying to find information about the invasion of Balochistan. Thank you. You know, Maybe the ground invasion won't happen after they watch my stream. Maybe they're going to watch my stream and they're going to say it's not going to happen anymore.

Wouldn't that be wonderful?

Anyway, guys, I think we're going to move on to the next segment of the stream.

Um... I think we're going to move on to the next segment of the stream. We're going to be doing our debates.

Ones, if you're excited for that.

Best way to show excitement, of course,

is to drop five subs.

I mean, I just...

I'm just saying.

I'm just saying.

Let's go ahead and start.

Jason, what's up, man?

I appreciate you.

All right.

Let's start our debate segment.

Or our education segment.

I think there was a lot of education,

education.

Going on.

Gorilla! What the fuck? Guys, thank you. Holy shit.

Strayal Stani, Gorilla, thank you guys. Appreciate you.

What's up guys?

You can't see me right now, but trust me I still exist.

Trust me, everything is still real, right?

I'm still real.

I've always been a real one. You know, Trying to get a good title in here.

I'm saying communism works. Trying to get a good title in here.

I'm saying communism works.

What is our dividing line with these redditors?

It's always the LGBT shit that I just don't care about

I don't even want to

bait that

trigger them with that I just don't care

base populace what's up All right.

All right.

We're going gonna do this.

By the way, guys, I want to tell you something.

Do not fucking donate on TikTok to me.

You want to fucking donate?

Do it on kick, where I get literally 100%. Don't fucking do it on shit talk where they take 50 all right

just letting you know all right y'all, we're operational.

Okay, so, um, all right.

So we're going to be doing this and we're going to be uh

resuming

our talk

Holy shit

I am actually

you can see in my fucking eyes how tired I am

holy fuck

that's okay

we can solve that

all right

so uh... we're gonna be having people debate

we're gonna be having people debate.

We're going to be having people step up and confront me with their objections if they have any, which I doubt, because most of these people are not human.

But yeah, we're going to be talking about, in general,

Marxism, Marxism, Leninism, communism, things like that.

You know, you have to first start out by pointing out the obvious, which is that

if you want to, if, first of all, if you're interested in Marxist or communist ideas, first thing you have to do is avoid communities, besides ours, which is correct.

But if you don't trust that, then avoid all of them, which have been founded on the basis of a shared interpretation, because these communities

have gone nowhere. So you should directly, directly try to interpret and understand what Marx, Lenin, Mao, and so on and so on, we're trying to say, and avoid the prejudices that are established on subreddits and discords and reddits that attempt to monopolize the meaningfulness of the revolutionary tradition. Why? Because the people who try to monopolize the

meaningfulness of communist experience and the revolutionary tradition, especially in Western

countries, have not accomplished anything. They've never accomplished anything. I mean, if you're a

Marxist-Leninist in the West, and I keep saying this, and I keep emphasizing this, if you forget that, if you call yourself a communist and you live in a Western country, there has never been a successful communist revolution in any Western country. So where does the gatekeeping and dogmatism come from? That's what I want to know. Where does the gatekeeping and dogmatism come from? The question of how we interpret the revolutionary experiences of non-Western countries is not automatically given. There are no academic gatekeepers who understand

the Chinese Revolution who live in Western countries, because if there were, they would be able

to distill that experience and apply it to the country we live in, but they haven't. So therefore,

they don't actually know anything about what

happened in China. Western, quote-unquote, Marxists don't know anything. If they knew anything,

they'd have the practice to show for it. So the floodgates are open as far as how we interpret

Marxism and how we make sense of it. And there's no ability for anyone to say, you're a Nasbole, you're not a real leftist, you're not a real Marxist, yada, yada, yada, because where's the practice you have to show for this grandstanding, this sense of authoritative knowledge about the tradition when there's no practice to show for it. This is the thing I've been saying since 2021 when infrared first launched, that there's no basis for dogmatism because you have no practice to show for it.

Communism will never win.

Except in China, except in Russia and pretty much destined to win on a world historical scale

in exact proportion to the collapse and breakdown of Pax Americana, which is now happening as a

consequence of the imminent ground invasion of Iran, which is going to cause a global energy crisis, which is going to lead to social unrest and political turmoil in nearly every nation on earth and break down the global economic and political system of geopolitical hegemony and financial control as we know it. Now, if you don't think that's going to entail a victory of communism in the long run,

then you probably just believe we're going to have another dark ages for another thousand years,

which we may very well have. We may have a dark age that lasts another thousand years. But guess what?

After that dark age is over, communism's coming back. In the end, communism will

win, and it is a matter of cosmic inevitability. It's unavoidable. It's absolutely unavoidable,

and it's a matter of cosmic inevitability. It is destined.

Communism is the resolution of cosmos, the deeper nature and lawful order of things, and logos, the principle that guides the development of said things and determinations

the resolution of communism and the resolution of cosmosmos and Logos

is communism.

I am the

Arab Professor

Jiang and I will teach it to you

on my white board. i don't need a white board to teach you the truth communism is cosmos and logos reconciled and resolved. Cosmos is the order of nature and the stars,

and the earth and the planets and the heavenly bodies and the biology and all of the things in the physical universe.

Logos is the underlying principle that guides the development of things, which it's only

intelligible to the thinking consciousness and to human beings with the rise of humanity, which is the culmination of nature, by the way.

Now, the history of humanity is a conflict between the cosmos and the logos, and communism is a resolution of that conflict. So it is a matter of inevitability, communism. As long as there is cosmos and there is logos, on the other hand, there is the communism, because both of

these things occupy and partake and exist within the same reality. go ahead joey hello hello do you hear me yeah, do you like to do political debates or?

Yeah.

Okay.

Great.

One thing that I know that you're a pretty, you're an ACP party member um i think i understand the basics of your ideology i would

just pose one quick thing do you believe that communist movements can actually unify different

civilizations i view them i view it as insufficient and that the Russian and

cynic civilizations are simply too incompatible, which is what led to all the conflicts

during the Cold War.

You just have to build cities along the border. That's it. That's how it works. You build cities along the border. And then the cities are commercial and cultural and sites of exchange. and that's how people

just become

fused together.

But do you

do you actually believe

that these civilizations can be fused?

I think this is a...

In the long run, yeah, they can be fused in proportion to the proliferation of other differences.

For example, you know, difference is something that is also constantly being reproduced in a direct proportion to the kind of consolidation of homogeneity.

So there's nothing, the problem is not the difference and the problem is not the homogeneity.

The problem is finding the harmony between the two.

And the notion that the boundaries between the two are fixed is absolutely false.

So currently we have certain boundaries of the heterogeneity and the homogeneity.

These boundaries change across history.

Will there always be differences between people?

Yes, but which people?

This will always change.

Never has remained constant.

I guess my argument is a bit different in the sense of not purely from a civilizational

You can stay, Joey, I didn't even interrupt you, but congratulations 15 people left because they thought you were boring. But I just wanted to let you know that. Please continue.

Oh, would you like me to be more... No, no, no, just continue. I just wanted to let you know people

found you boring. Oh, I don't know how it makes you feel. Go ahead. Sure. I mean, I think the topic is,

I think I'm trying to be a bit unique.

You know, I feel like a lot of the talking points are over and over.

But the key thing for me is that you see two great continental empires, the Russians and the Chinese.

And I think that inherently they want the other side to be weak.

That's why Stalin funded both sides of the Chinese Civil War.

And that's why China is okay with the USSR dissolving.

I don't think you can have two great superpowers bordering each other because that

undermines both of their security. Yeah, but you're

you're, this is, this is

why

by the way, six people just left because they were

really bored by what you said. But

I just want to, I just want you to be aware

of these things.

But anyway, no, this is the problem with your paradigm is it doesn't understand how the internal contradictions within the Soviet Union and China played the determining and driving role in the interactions between the communist movement within China on one hand and

the USSR on the other hand.

The reason that Moscow

was suspicious and wary

of the Chinese was not

because Stalin feared

China and because of an inevitable kind of civilizational clash between Russia and China.

It was because I haven't slept in one day, so you'll forgive me for not remembering the precise conference.

No worse.

I'm not here like,

gotcha.

Don't interrupt me.

There's a specific conference

that happens

following a series of

continuous tactical

military defeats on the part

of the People's Liberation Army and the Communist Party of China.

And this is in the early 1930s.

And this is a consequence of the fact that the Chinese were following the advice of the Moscow educated and aligned Communist Party leadership and attaches that were sent for Moscow to basically dominate and lead the communist movement within China on behalf of the common turn.

Now out comes Mao Zeyong, who very much is a heterodox Marxist with respect to the common turn's orthodoxy, and specifically the Moscow's orthodoxy.

Mao is a unconventional thinker for a number of reasons. He has a kind of unique under appraisal of the class conditions within China. He believes there's a revolutionary potential among the Chinese peasantry.

The majority of Marxists in China claim that the peasantry were petty bourgeois.

They, you know,

own property or something.

So Mao,

he is disagreeing

with the dogmas

Moscow,

the institutional dogmas.

And because of the

failures of the PLA and the CPC,

yeah, the Zuni

conference, thank you so much. The Zunei conference

I knew it started with a ZI. It was fuzzy on Yeah, the Zuni conference. Thank you so much. The Zunyi conference.

I knew it started with a Z.

I was fuzzy on the name.

Mao won out.

He won the, his arguments were compelling.

And that's what began the long march, okay, which is a series of guerrilla tactics pioneered by Mao, which saved the CPC.

And this humiliated Moscow. And that is the source and the beginning of the tension.

And, you know, this, that exact cliff between Mao's revolutionary strategy, which is unconventional, which is based in guerrilla war, which is based in being rooted in the Chinese masses and the Chinese peasants, fell out with Moscow's orthodoxy.

That was the source of the tension.

It wasn't because Stalin feared a powerful China for the sake of it what Stalin specifically feared was that there was going to be a new kind of center of Marxism and

communism that undermined the institutional orthodoxy centered in Moscow, which could lead to all sorts of problems, which you can absolutely translate domestically within the Soviet Union. For example, what if these Siberian kind of ambiguous populations within Russia began to take up Mao's line of thinking and apply it domestically and internally?

This kind of suspicion of experts, this wariness with respect to

there were

kind of examples of this in the USSR,

for example, the Shakti trial,

the trial of the various Menshevik engineers.

You had the Stokhanov movement

itself. But ultimately, Stalin remained committed to the

social democratic paradigm of the urban proletariat taking a leading role. And ultimately uh that was the source of the conflict

it wasn't because there's there's no possible

the problem with your view is it's metaphysical joey you believe that these civilizations

are completely self-same, discrete categories

of identity, and that there's just an incommensurability of identity. You know, cat cannot be dog,

fox cannot be wolf, whatever. But you neglect the dimension of logos, the real

principle that gives these civilizations the determinations they have. That principle is continuously

suspended in a revolutionary development, and it manifests itself in the internal contradictions of each civilization.

To say that a civilization is incompatible with another innately neglects what actually gives

that civilization its character in the first

place?

Yeah, I guess for me

my argument is quite simple.

You can make arguments

of experts, urban versus rural, to justify what created the collapse of the Sino-Soviet split. I'm simply suggesting that it is because of civilizational incompatibility.

How? Name the causal mechanism. How?

I would say, for one, name the causal mechanism. How? I would say

for one,

it's the idea

that a civilization

creates a great

empire.

No,

no,

I don't want these.

These are poop fart,

Hoy,

for,

poop fart,

poop fart,

strategy map game.

Give me the causal mechanism that makes it that makes Russia and China irreconcilable

at the level of bordering

communities

like at the level of the people themselves

there's no ability for them to fuse together

in any kind of way,

and there's an absolute barrier between them. Just like at that level, talk about it. Don't say,

well, there's a big empire, and that big empire doesn't like the other big empire. It's like,

this is BrainRot from map

games, okay? Give me

the causal mechanism. Are you saying

biologically? Because there's some

racial theorists who will claim.

Well, there's these immutable racial characteristics

we acquired in the Savannah 200,000

years ago

which still are the

causal determining basis of

the character

of civilizations. I kind of think

that's really stupid. But

you're free to argue that if you want, but what's

the causal mechanism?

Sure.

My argument's not along racial lines.

I think that's pretty played out.

My argument is more along the idea of being a continental empire and that we've seen throughout history, continental empires can't be secure unless their

neighbors are failed states.

Okay.

So you just gave me a big

poop fart answer.

It's a very big poop.

Very, very loud fart.

Like, it's a big, big one.

But what you didn't do is explain the causal mechanism specifically.

Without resorting to this metaphysical abstraction of the eternity of continental empires.

What makes it impossible for two imperial centers, for example?

Forget about this abstraction of imperial centers.

Analyze how the Soviet Union worked, concretely.

Don't just claim it's an empire.

How did the empire work?

Because it's not the same kind of empire as, you know, the British Empire, for example.

And then talk about the kind of the People's Republic.

What was structurally and systematically incommensurate?

Because I could give you an answer at the causal level.

So I challenge you to do the same thing.

Sure.

And just so I understand you're saying between like the Tsarish regime and the Soviet regime?

No.

Between the Soviet regime and the People's Republic of China.

What was actually structurally incommensurate?

In terms of how these systems worked?

Sure.

I would say that both, I know you're not going to like this answer, but both the Chinese Communist Party and the Soviet Communist Party were inherently

quite nationalistic and because

of this disputed territory such as

Venturia and such as the territories that were taken

by the Russian Empire

by the Russian Empire against the Qing Empire

that this revanchism would forever happen between these two great civilizations.

Okay. So those border disputes have already been resolved, by the way, through bilateral treaties between the Russians and Chinese. So I guess that argument is just shot out of existence because of things that have actually happened recently.

Well, I mean, again, you're talking about during that time period

no i'm saying but the idea that it would have been impossible for them to come to an understanding

about those doesn't square with the fact that they have already done so today.

Well, I will say this.

It's because the Russian civilization has been so degraded to the point that they can no longer actually exert much influence in the region.

And they have to be sent to. China hasn't taken over those regions and annexed them.

Yet.

Yeah, but, okay, so China has not performed in the capacity of transgressing the legalistic agreements it makes within a bilateral framework thus far. So this is just pure speculation.

And you can't argue with speculation that is baseless. You just say, well, it's going to happen. Okay, so the, you're proposing that the reason for the Sino-Soviet split ultimately lied in a disputed territories over the history of Russia and China.

Yes, because I do go to the original point of that it's because continental umpires can't allow strong continental empires next to each other

and poopy fart can't poopy wet farts can't poop all over the place without leaving a poop stain on the poop fart fart noise.

But one quick thing.

This is just complete metaphysical gibberish, okay?

Specifically what happened with respect to the breakdown of relations between the People's

Republic of China and the Soviet Union

which happens after Stalin's death

by the way, the roots of the tensions

lie in the fact that

Mao Zedong tapped into

a

revolutionary strategy and a revolutionary strategy

and a revolutionary

subject, a construction,

structure of a revolutionary subject, which is

the institutional and political base of political

power itself, became an

irreconcilable political paradigm. systemic and political economic paradigm i can

explain how that is concretely with respect to the system that existed in the soviet union and that

made mutual recognition almost impossible the so The Soviets were disgusted by the way

Mao was running things in China. And it's not that they weren't able to understand it. It's

precisely because they were able to understand it that they were hostile to it. They. These bureaucrats and technocrats in the USSR were looking at China and saying,

would we let this happen in our country?

Hell no.

So first of all, we can't share a kind of great big union with the Chinese because we have a fundamental disagreement about how shit's supposed to be run.

And that was almost a kind of class antagonism and distinction that we're talking about.

You had Soviet-educated engineers and experts that became the foundation of the People's Republic

of China, infrastructurally.

The engineers, the scientists, the technical experts.

First of all, we were all educated in Russia.

And then in addition,

Russia sent its own engineers and experts to China.

Now, what it also sent was loans.

They gave them pretty generous loans,

but these loans are what kind of were the bedrock and the basis of China's initial industrial development in the 1950s.

Now, Joey, what actually ended up happening is that a major dispute and conflict ensued within the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.

I think around the time of the second, third, five-year plan, I forget, where they're saying, okay, so far we've been industrializing on the back of Soviet loans.

But the pace of our industrialization is such that we're never even going to repay these loans.

Okay?

So we're kind of permanently putting ourselves in debt to the Soviets. and we're not able to build our own

industrial base that is actually going to, like, escape this dependency. Structurally and

institutionally, the adoption of Soviet paradigms of development and industrialization was the reason for this the chinese

had adopted um soviet expertise and soviet uh educated expertise and they had to think outside of the box and and search for creative

institute creative solutions for how they're going to industrialize their country which inevitably

is going to disrupt the system of bureaucracy and industrial development that the Soviets saw as sacred, sacroscent, and orthodox, right? And just kind of a given. So there was a conflict within China between doing things the Soviet way or this new creative way.

And the Soviets didn't like this for a number of reasons.

One, they thought that this was like a blind alley.

You know, the Chinese are going to pursue,

they're going to pursue the construction of socialism

in a way that totally defies all of our

paradigms and methods of development.

Doesn't that provoke a degree of

introspection on our part?

This leads us to even question how we're doing

things now, which they very well could have

question.

So the roots of the tension has always

been in a kind of class struggle

within the bureaucracies. The Soviet bureaucracy was fearful,

ultimately, that something like Mao's disruption of the communist system was going to happen or spill

over into the Soviet Union, which they were

deathly afraid of. That was the source. That's how I'm naming causally the source of the

disruption and the dispute. It wasn't because there was a failure of mutual understanding.

There was precisely a mutual understanding.

And the understanding was on the basis of an irreconcilable difference of the future of socialist

construction.

And I guess the other causal relationship that I think gets missed a lot, especially when we look back on the post-mortem.

And by the way, if this problem didn't exist, all the border disputes, that could have easily been resolved. No problem. They could have formed a union state together such talks by

the way were motioned it it wasn't impossible if the Soviet Union can exist as a

union of all these disparate cultures and so of course Of course there could be a union state with the Chinese,

as long as they're on the same page about what socialist construction is

and what the proletarian dictatorship is.

But there was a disagreement at that level,

which was a reflection of

a kind of symmetrical and parallel contradictions

both within China and the USSR.

There was a very prominent faction

and force within Chinese

politics and institutions

that represented

the Soviet way of doing things

and pushed for increased

closeness and

so on with the Soviet Union.

For example, even in the heydays

of the culture of revolution, Lin Bao, fled to the Soviet Union.

And then, for example, during the speech in 1959, in the midst of the Great Leap Forward or was it 1960? I forget.

What was his name? He was accused of being a Soviet spy and denounced on that basis and arrested.

A lot of people were.

One specific guy who gave a speech at the... on that basis and arrested. A lot of people were.

One specific guy who gave a speech at the Hennon, was it the Hennon conference?

I literally haven't slept in one day, so I forgot.

It's okay.

I just want to interject real quick.

So.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

I think it was Peng D.

I think I believe it was.

I believe it was.

One thing that I just want to stress, though, is that Stalin was a student.

By the way,

Lushan conference, not Hinnon.

What the fuck am I talking about?

The Lushan conference.

I remembered.

Lusanne conference.

Anyway.

I just want to say.

If your theory was correct, this internal

conflict wouldn't have existed. It would have just been

the Chinese versus Russians.

But we see it wasn't so.

Well, I wouldn't say it's as simple as

Chinese versus Russians because I agree with you. Soviets were multi-ethnic they were the descendants of just the Russian Empire but the key thing is that the great conflict with Stalin in particular in terms of antagonizing Mao, and essentially the seeds that led to the collapse of relations, was because he was a student of Realpolitik. He actually did not want to see a unified China. He did fund both the KMT.

There's no, no, there's no proof of that.

Stalin,

it's just speculation.

The reason Stalin had close ties to the KMT was for two reasons.

One,

Stalin, uh, was for two reasons one uh stallin uh in the 1920s the kmt was a popular front wasn't inherently

anti-communist all of that changed in nineteen twenty seven during the shanghai massacre27 during the Shanghai massacre.

But during the Japanese invasion of China, and by the way, Stalin was a cynic, he didn't believe that Mao's peasant-led army was going to be able to assume leadership of China.

So they were banking on the KMT still being

the real leaders of China. And by the way, don't, this is so normal for the Soviets, because

the Soviets are dealing with a world where the majority of the communist parties are marginal

forces. So you want to

deal with the leadership of a country, you deal with the actual leaders, not the idealists and

ideologs who agree with you. Yeah. It's just kind of Soviet way of thinking. But there was also a

popular front after the Japanese invaded where the communists and the KMT aligned.

Now the idea that's, so this is the basis of Stalin quote unquote funding both sides. The reality is Soviet support for the communists in China was absolutely decisive for their victory.

Because the Manchuria, Soviet invasion of Manchuria is what gave the communists a base of operations,

access to advanced, relatively advanced military infrastructure and capabilities

that they could use to conquer the rest of China to the south.

So if Stalin didn't want China to be unified, he sure as hell did a bad job of preventing it from happening.

I think the

reason why I say he didn't want to unify China

is because when there was an attempt

for Mao to clip

Changsai Czech. It was

put down by Stalin. He essentially

didn't commend the operation he said.

I think this would have

been 34,

five or six. I can't

remember.

At the time in which

the Russians regarded the KMT

as the dominant force within China

and didn't want to

jeopardize their relationships,

that's not proof of

Stalin not wanting

China to be unified.

It's just proof that he didn't want to make a risky move with respect to the forces he considered the dominant leadership within China.

And I think the other example of how they were okay with essentially a fractured, failed China at its border was taking all the territories from the Qing Empire, where they actually started to seize territory. And they liked that because they could physically expand their borders.

The Soviet Union did not do that.

The Soviet Union did take territory during the Chinese Civil War.

The Soviet Union, not from the Qing Empire.

Sorry, from the descendants of the Qing Empire during the warlord period.

Okay.

Which territory specifically are you referring to?

I believe the pronunciation was Zhao Ma.

It was inumann. It was

in western China

and it was

fed into Tanitouva,

I believe. And also

bringing Mongolia and setting it up as

Yeah, Mongolia, we're not going to talk about Mongolia

right now, but

that's a more complicated

case.

I thought you would be referencing Mongolia.

You're talking about in western part of China, yeah, well, again, I don't think

this is proof that the Soviets were deliberately attempting to

prevent the unification of China.

And I guess the

I want to go on to continue to logic.

I'm going to simplify this.

You see different civilizations.

I ask the question, what makes civilizations the way they are?

There's a logos, okay?

The logos, there's a shared intelligibility of the same logos that makes one civilization different from another

within the other civilization which you want me to translate to you

logos is universally intelligible

okay so

you can't say well this

this is the China man and this is

the Russian and they're just distinct

specimen no there's a reason

they their way they are and that

reason is mutually intelligible, actually.

In both internally and between each other, right?

In terms of like an exchange of perspectives or whatever.

And also, in what ways could I also be like this or see things this way?

And that manifests an internal contradiction.

So this is the problem I have with the kind of metaphysical idea of discrete civilizations that are self-same identities. The logos that makes a civilization

is not exclusively intelligible only to that civilization. It's the same logos responsible for the development of

all history across all the whole world, right? Like the Higelian spirit, if you will.

Look, I totally agree with you. I think you can socially engineer someone into a different civilization.

There's not a genetic basis. It's not about social engineering. It's not about socially engineering. It's about the fact that there is no meta-civilizational framework where one can be said to be better than the other. There are different

ways of responding to the same thing and you cannot say like, well, it's not even like about

better in a normative sense. It's about like, well, we're going to do it this way instead

of that way because. There's no because. There's no kind of meta-civilizational framework with which

to compare them. That's the problem in the first place. I guess the main point that I wanted to make, and I wanted to, I would, this is the one

that I'm actually curious about your take.

Since I operate under a concept of clash of civilizations, and not necessarily on a

racialized line but along a linguistic

cultural line, religious line.

But you consider these things

hard barriers and I see

the

fluidity of these barriers.

Yes. I understand.

I agree.

They can become fluid.

I just think that it's in the border regions, not as a whole.

But my main point...

No, no, as a whole, there's a fluidity that is in the form of the internal

contradictions.

The fact that they're just

constantly suspended in development

and change. And the

logic underlying that change is what's

decisive.

But the, I want to pose this to you. I understand that you would like to implement a similar

political system of the Chinese inside the American system. But since we've seen the insane competition

infighting land

disputes between the Chinese

and the Soviets, who's to

say that even if you implement this system

there won't be an inevitable clash

between American and Chinese civilization?

Because we have to understand first what is a civilization.

It's because we don't understand what is a civilization at the level of...

At the level of at the level of

how should I say

a consciously

intelligible logos

that we

that there was that there are such disputes

in the first place and only the transition from

american barbarism to civilization will universalize the science of civilization for mankind

uh china is a civilization but of civilization for mankind.

China is a civilization, but is the logos of Chinese civilization overtly and explicitly transparent to the Chinese or anyone?

No, of course it's not. It's profoundly unconscious and remains only unconscious. So the true science of civilization doesn't exist yet. Now people like Alexander Dugin attempt to establish the foundations of this science.

As a Marxist and materialist, I don't

fully agree with Dugin,

but he is

occupying a niche that Marxists are not

with respect to that.

Fair enough.

I will say, I appreciate our conversation,

and just remember,

I do believe that the results of history are not determined by ideology, but based off our history and our civilizations.

Ideology is merely a...

Yeah, but let's forget.

Ideology is about ideality.

It's about the idos

and idea. But logos is more fundamental

than idos. So let's

talk about logos.

Anyway.

But I appreciate

your time and I wish you the best.

You too.

Bye-bye.

You also drop 10 subs.

Only if you want.

Okay, who else requesting?

Someone else was requesting.

Nobody's requesting.

This is just a great content.

So I'm talking about Marxism and the inability for dogmatism to be possible in Western countries when you've never had a successful revolution or practice to show for it.

Amila!

What's up?

Thank you so much. request

of course

who has a problem

you say you're trolling right

Trayvon go ahead and request and see who's trolling

go ahead and request and we'll see who's trolling

why do you think I'm trolling?

What is this?

You think it's the circus?

Somebody name Eurasian Larp just joined.

Thank you for that name.

What a great name.

Guys, I'm just an unk.

I'm literally 29.

I'm an old person.

So you could just troll me.

I'm so stupid.

I'm like a boomer.

You just trolling me.

I'm so stupid i'm like a boomer you just trolling me i'm so clueless

unk status you need a banner with the topic i'm unk status i don't understand anything about Tick-Tac. Tick-Tac.

I don't know how to use Tick-Tac.

So it's not my fault.

Tick-Tac is just very difficult for me to understand. you're so whatever coded can Can you speak English, buddy? What are you talking about?

Kind of talking nonsense here. Unthought Stalin stages him as proof that he wanted...

Yeah, I thought you were making fun of me for a second.

I don't think Stalin...

It's not Stalin's fault, by the way.

It's the fault of the institutionalization

of many of the pre-given conventions

of social democratic theory

that the Bolsheviks

didn't have time to comprehensively reevaluate.

And Stalin is the voice of the party.

He's the voice of the Soviet Union on an impersonal level. So of course he's going to, you know, the same things that made Stalin great were also the same things that are in the 30%

that Mao criticized, the things that made Stalin

a less revolutionary thinker than Mao.

Stalin is still, I mean,

don't get me wrong, he's still Stalin, but

he was wrong with respect to his dispute with Mao, you know?

You're a legend. I like your stuff thank you man

is putting Is Putin holding back Russia? No, he's not. He's not.

Putin is not holding back anything. Russia itself is holding itself back. Well, it's not holding itself back.

Well, it's not holding itself back.

It just hasn't discovered how to pursue socialism today in the 21st century.

At the level of the society, the society itself, Putin just represents the state of Russian society. You can't blame him.

You cannot blame him at all.

You think Russia's you think russia yes of course i mean um russia is in infrastructurely a socialist country okay

russia is a socialist country you want? Russia is a socialist

country. You want to debate me on that?

I'll take you to town on it.

Russia is a socialist country that has been

colonized financially by

the IMF and Western

financial institutions since 1991.

But the fundamental foundation materially of socialist, the socialist system and civilization didn't disappear overnight.

So for Russia to kind of return to sovereign socialism is really what we're talking about is a matter of increasingly breaking with the unipolar world order economically. So this is the truth.

And the SMO is a big factor in jump-starting Russia's development toward that end.

ACP American Chud Party Based on what?

How are we Chuds? Isn't that aren't chuds super pessimistic and

like hate society and stuff isn't that you

when you think about it if you're trying to total if you're at war

with uh conventional, like, I don't know, sexuality and norms within society, doesn't that make you kind of a chud sitting there being like, I hate that everyone isn't a furry

like aren't you the chud

when you think about it

how are we the chud

we literally swim among the masses

like a fish swims in the sea

so what are you talking about

do you ever drink not really So what are you talking about?

Do you ever drink? Not really.

Not really.

Not really.

Magacombs are chuds. Hate to break it to you.

You're cattle. You're just brainwashed by, you're not saying this because you've arrived at this conclusion through some independent device of thought. You are going, you're

just repeating with what some Discord or Reddit made popular to say. And I'd feel bad for you. You've never actually, like, thought about that critically. You're just saying it because it's like a popular thing to say, basically. Which, I mean, I guess that's human nature, right? Whatever.

Yeah. nature, right? Whatever. Megacombs, it's like, it's such an NPC take. It's just like, well, you're just saying that because it's a popular thing to say. What's the basis of it? Is it, is there actually a foundation or basis of this claim? It's kind of it. Is there actually a foundation or basis of this claim?

It's kind of stupid. I mean, look at our, go on ACP main right now. Look at our

people. I don't really think we're chuds.

I think you're just a little

soy and Reddit yourself. Why'd you stop posting on YouTube?

Because becoming the chairman of the Communist Party,

coupled with my writings, just totally made it impossible for me to run the YouTube channel. I'm trying to post on it again. Kind of working on a big video project for that, but doing it with the same degree of regularity as before just became impossible.

I used to be greatest chud movement.

You know what? I'm curious. So Dead Boy status, do you speak with a like uh like this are you

neurodivergent in any way or like i just don't see like the sapiens or the sentience behind

your contributions to the to the live stream. I just kind of think you're like

an automaton who's just repeating things over and over again. How does it like to organize

and run a communist party? Um... his party.

The hardest part was like thinking first year of it was very hard because you just had to start really no longer thinking as an individual but like being really impersonal about shit and um squabbles and stuff, you just have to really acquire a level of patience that is inhuman, frankly.

Not normally human, really. But how is it? I mean, it's wonderful. It's great. It's a, it's a purposeful existence.

This person saying Slava, Ukraine.

So you're a child predator got it

noah has a problem with maga communism no what's the problem with Maga Communism.

Noah, what's the problem with Maga Communism?

And before you answer that, are you a Marxist-Leninist, self-proclaimed one, or are you a Trotskyite?

Because if you're a Trotskyite, I don't consider you human, and I don't even care what you have to say.

Or if you're some other kind of variant of non-communist.

Noah, what's your problem with maga-communism? Let's hear it. I'm not above engaging you. I'm so famous. I understand how famous I am. I'm not above this. I'm looking at you directly, Noah. I'm literally looking at you on a personal level right now.

I'm literally looking at you. I'm literally looking at you. Yeah. You? Can you explain? Oh no, he looked away. Okay, it's over.

Maga, what is this thing where it's like

I go

I go somewhere

I drop a video

I'm on TikTok

and then

these automaton

NPCs will just like

I'm gonna poop on you

with a slogan

mega

communism

desert that

it's like

what are you what are you

what are you you you're just kind of like

pooping

what are you saying

you're just repeating with

some

it's kind of a sheep

like I don't, you've never thought

about it yourself.

You still call these old

Maga Communists

despite the files.

The files

have led to the break

between the MAGA movement

and Trump that vindicates

and proves that that movement was never

reducible to Trump in the first place, which is the founding purport of the idea of MAGA

communism, that we should try to disseminate communist consciousness among the MAGA base

and not

interpretive dance

students and other

glasses wearing

parasites. That was

the basic gist of it. Instead of the

professional managerials as the base of a communist movement, let's actually go to the blue-collar working class, MAGA people.

Like, that's the whole idea.

And I feel like that was very vindicated by the fact that two simultaneous political developments have occurred.

The MAGA base has shifted to anti-Zionism, broke with Trump, and is fully against the regime, basically, and ready for revolution, whereas the Democratic Party base has shifted more in the

favor of Zionism because it has to morally justify Israel. And it has simultaneously become, it's doubled

down on its support for the so-called NATO allies and imperialism.

So the MAGA base became anti-Zionist and anti-NATO,

and the liberal Democrat base became more pro-Zionist and more pro-NATO.

Even the socialist wing, like Kate Abu Ghazala,

is very much fervently pro-Nado, pro-Ukraine,

and anti-Wun-China policy.

So I think that Maga-Communism was very much vindicated, actually.

Earth Eater, go ahead.

Hey, what's going on, man?

What's up?

I've seen you on Twitter quite a bit.

I am

the ACP does seem pretty good.

I have to admit that communism does follow a logical train of thought

I'm just wondering what

the ACP

do you guys still worship niggers or what

Oh very funny

I'm not it's not a joke

It's just so edgy It's just a joke. It's so edgy.

It's just so edgy.

It's like, oh, I've never heard that word in my life.

I'm just traumatized.

Um, I'm going to get you banned from TikTok.

I'm going to get you banned from TikTok.

I'm going to get you banned. It. I'm gonna get you banned...

It's funny because this is the guy who thinks

he's the funny troublemaker in school.

I'm the bad kid.

You think you're a bad kid, right?

You're the bad guy.

But you're actually a snitch. Why? because you're just saying these things to get me

reported and get my live taken down or or limited or banned you're not the you're not the

bad the cool bad kid you're a snitch you're a pathetic weak snitch oh i'm so edgy and i'm so cool no you're not

you're a snitch if it weren't for the fact that uh tic you know, is going to censor me and punish me for you saying this dumb shit,

what you say would have had no reaction at all. Nobody cares.

You just embarrass yourself and poop that same energy.

You can't.

When you're around black people, you start pooping your pants.

You don't speak in this big way.

So don't speak that way on the internet.

Simple as that.

By the way, if you are scared of and you hate black people, I just see you as a pathetic weakling.

You're not even human to me if you... If there's something about black people that just scares you and you can't even...

You're just like a... you're weak to me you're

like a very if you give very like effeminate male energy and i just cannot respect you Thank you. nobody takes your party seriously there's no point to Maga Communism, LMAO.

So, Ridd, um, what, what did you think you were doing by saying that when you type that in it?

I just want to visualize it.

What was, what's the point of what you're trying to say?

Nobody, even if it was true that nobody took us seriously.

What does that have to do with whether we're correct or not?

And you're saying, well, some people have to take you seriously correct.

How many people took the Bolshevik seriously?

After the Bolshevik-Menshevik split, was it 1904?

Or 07?

I haven't slept in one day, so I'm on dates during the bolshevik menshevick split

how many people took the bolshevik seriously can you tell me how many uh was lenin a popular

or obscure figure for the majority of his life?

So these phrases, you're just announcing to the world that you're unprincipled.

You think you go with the flow, you're a cattle, and you you just whatever's popular is what you believe in

um i never claimed that our position is popular among the liberal left which institutionally

uh is is disadvantages us because it gets the left, which institutionally is,

is, disadvantages us

because it gets the support from the bourgeoisie

directly through billionaire money and

through its connections to the Democratic

Party and so on and so on. I never

said we weren't institutionally disadvantaged,

even on the media space.

But have I ever been able to, been unable to justify my position?

Of course I can justify my position, which is why you don't have a critique or line of attack that holds under scrutiny.

Would you call yourself a nationalist?

No.

No, actually, I just said in the debate with Joey, not only am I not a nationalist, I go a step farther than Dugan does.

I believe there is a universal intelligibility of the same logos that defines civilizations.

So the problem with now, I can tell you the problem with nationalism.

The problem with nationalism is the same thing as the problem with bourgeois formalism. Because nations are a form of a revolutionary process that is itself devoid of national identity. So when a revolution happens within a nation, the national

identity is fully suspended

in a relational process

that there's no identity

anymore. It's like a chaos.

And that contradictory development

is what creates nations and gives nations the determinations that they have.

So the reason I reject nationalism is because I don't think the nation is the cause of nations.

Just like I don't think the platonic idos, the idea, the form, is the basis of the form.

I believe in the content.

The content is a revolutionary process that fully suspends all fixed identities and is the real content and causal basis of the various diverse different civilizations and nations on earth.

So I have a proper theoretical justification for the rejection of nationalism.

Do you actually organize the working class or just post content?

Do I personally, I'm one individual. So I personally do not individually organize the working class. The party that I belong to, the American Communist Party does in fact organize the

working class

and in fact

to be frank with you

let's think about what is the paradigm

we do that by the way

we do we absolutely show up to strikes and uh you know we try to organize

workers and we do that we do the basics that lennin talked about but the more most fundamental

way to organize the proletariat is to build dual power and to be an organization of preppers, basically.

That's the line of thinking we learned from Mao Seitong thought.

Did Mao Seitong even do what we do with the organ?

No, he didn't.

He simply built an alternative basis of political authority and power in the

PLA which became the foundation of the future proletarian dictatorship so that's more important to me

but additionally yes we do try to organize the working class. Costco.

I think you're one of us.

Costco.

I am. Yeah, what's

up, man? I've been thinking,

I got this idea stick in my head that I wanted to hear

your thoughts on, but it's essentially

boils down to the U.S. government

foreign policy exists right now

to eliminate every single option except

for World War III with China.

And that at that point, it comes down to either

full on war with China that nobody thinks we can win

or full cooperation with them, in which case I feel like

the rallying cry of, well, they built the trains here once

already, some pretty strong

pull of the American people.

I just kind of see that as being

like a possible future.

The long term strategy is the destruction

of the CPC.

The problem

the U.S. has is not necessarily

China,

but more specifically

China's sovereignty.

Yeah.

The U.S.

The U.S. is a great big

system that it has to align with its control.

And the CPC is outside of that control.

And that's the problem they have.

I see it more in terms of the thoughts of the American people,

unless you think like their

individual allegiances

aren't going to matter in that conflict

but like at a certain point. They won't.

They'll find a way to spin it.

The U.S. government

are masters of psychological manipulation.

They will find a way to spin

conflict. Yeah, I can see that. I just kind of see manipulation. They will find a way to spin.

I can see that. I just kind of see it as like, you know... You know what?

The BAP people already do it. They constantly

posting about Chinese animal cruelty,

which somehow works

for many people. Well, it works

now, but as China's material conditions improve,

it's working less and less. The zoomers are less problem. There is a total information control.

The flow of the information is controlled. The flow of narratives are also controlled.

For now, there seems like they're wild and they're free. But when it becomes decisive that they need the control, they'll be able to do it, I think.

Yeah, black build.

I can see it.

I just, I think that there's going to be some pull from the people when they actually say like hey it's time to go die for Taiwan of just like

Or we could just spend that money on you know let's be realistic yeah um but anyway thank you man appreciate and by the way you know i'll tell you this

i think that the moral

basis,

moral in quotes, I mean, like,

morale-wise, moral basis of

and justification of U.S.

aggression against China

will come from the Democratic socialists.

It's not going to come from Trump. It's going to come from kind of democratic socialists who claim that China is a capitalist, authoritarian, fascist state.

And that's what's going to make it a viable position to convince the U.S. public.

Can you give specific examples of organizing the working class?

We're attempting to organize

drainage workers who are

unmiss classified proletarians

at the ports

around the country.

We're still doing that.

We show up wherever we can

to acts of labor action like strikes, sit downs,

and so on and so on. We attempt wherever we can to organize ununionized, non-unionized workers

and participate in that unionization. We link up with labor organizations and labor initiatives wherever we can. Specifics. Okay, go to ACP Main and scroll through, and you'll find plenty examples.

You're just talking about specifics.

What do you mean?

Specific ports like the Newark Port or the Los Angeles Port in Orange County,

both of which I visited personally.

And... both of which I visited personally and participated in the organizing efforts

in the limited capacity that I did There's dual power strategy ever worked in a way?

It's never been attempted.

How do you deal with able-bodied people that refuse to work under communism? um good question uh i mean i have several answers but

you know, the spirit of communism, which is a society that is not resting so much on the laurels of the state to enforce and compel behavior, you're going to be talking about at the cultural level, shame, shame, ostracization, social ostracization, and marginalization and shame are going to be the primary factors that prevent

antisocial behavior according to the leninist paradigm hello yeah what's up

like you let me do you let them be homeless and starve them um well no in a communist

society um before it gets to that point, they're going to be given a headache socially.

They're not going to be able to have access to things without squaring the question of their reputation and honor and so on.

So, sorry, go ahead, Kay, go ahead.

Yeah, no worries.

So I've recently come across the ACP.

I've been looking for something that's like,

obviously the leftist space has been overrun by feds and shit,

so I'm just like trying to find something

that's a little bit more actual marxist but uh i've heard you guys have like connections with like

alexander dougan i don't know too much about dougan or like Duganism. All I hear is like,

what I see online and it's all like saying he's a

fascist or that's like pushing like a

ultra like nationalistic kind of rhetoric. But I was just looking if you could

clarify that or explain that. So I'll explain who Dugan is without getting too much in the intellectual side of things.

Dugan is renowned for being the theorist of multiparity.

So he is the theorist and primary thinker within Russia who connects Russia's

special military operation and global foreign policy goals with the Iranians, with the Chinese,

with Venezuelans, with the whole world, basically. So Dugan is a kind of

symbol of opposition to the U.S. unipolar hegemony. And the reason that is more fundamental than

leftist, quote-unquote, anti-imperialism is because leftist European- unquote anti-imperialism

is because leftist European

style anti-imperialism has been

opportunistically hijacked to accuse

Russia, China, Iran,

and so on of being imperialist.

So Dugan has a much more comprehensive

and principal paradigm of opposition to the U.S. unipolar world order.

This is the basis upon which he has renowned in fame.

During 2016 and there was intense anxiety on the part of the U.S. intelligence community and think tanks and so on, that Brahmins, if you will,

who were witnessing the rise of populism within the U.S.

from Bernie Sanders and Trump, whatever,

and they were connecting that to the multipolar world order,

and Russia specifically. So the boogeyman of dougan was created

that he's this dark evil wizard who's destabilizing western democracies and promoting populisms

that cut across traditional political alignments and distinctions. Now, the reason there's a cutting across of political alignments and distinctions isn't because Dugan's a fascist who, you know, is repeating the kind of traditional fascist, transcending left and right type of thing, but because the political alignment within the United States and within Europe is within the hegemony. Okay, so it's a kind of a fake

two-party system, for example,

Democrats versus Republicans.

And they're gerrymandered in such a way

that doesn't permit real structural opposition

to the machine itself.

So Dugan is associated with this kind of chaotic populism that is just disrupting conventional politics.

Of course, it's not true, but it was a thing created by a CIA employed thinker researcher named Alexander Reed Ross. He created the Dugan scare and the Nossbol scare.

Okay. So that's who's the source of it. Is the CIA guy, Alexander Reed Ross. He created the entire bogey manor status around

Dugan. That status

accelerated Dugan's fame,

intensified it, and

led several people like myself

to try and study and understand Dugan.

So I have engaged with Dugan's thinking, and Dugan's thinking is a source of influence for me, but I remain a Marxist and a Marxist Leninist.

Um, um, but people think that if you're a Marxist, you're a Marxist, you're a Marxist, you can't engage with 21st century thinkers. You have to confine yourself to the, to two things. The canon of Marxist-Lennonist literature

and Judith Butler's queer theory and transgender theories

that come out of French and American universities

in the 1980s and 1990s.

So I reject that.

I think we can engage with any thinker we want,

and it's our duty as Marxists, actually.

That's a really respectable position.

I appreciate your answer, sir.

You have a guest rest of your day.

Thank you.

All right. I think we're going to wrap up

our life.

Hope everyone had a wonderful and great time.

And we're wrapping it up. guys this is such easy content.

I can literally do it like every time I don't have content on stream, I could just do this instead.

Straight up.

It's like such easy content.

What do you guys think?

This is like easy, good content for like whenever I just need to end the stream or something.

But we'll see, guys. We'll see.

Uh, anyway, guys, if you're going to drop a, you know, if you're going to drop some subs,

then you should wait because I'm literally about to end the stream right now.

So totally don't milk TikTok dry.

You know what's funny is that if I do it consistently,

I'll actually grow on the algorithm on TikTok.

I just need to do it consistently,

and I'll just keep growing there.

And I think little by little it's making...

Look, guys, put it this way.

The X-spaces, I think, guys, put it this way. The X-Spaces

I think are much less

effective than this. In fact,

I may do the confronted chairman on

TikTok next time

because it's just so much more

effective. And

X-spaces, you don't get

the broad spectrum.

X-spaces, you get all sorts of random foreigners and stuff,

and it's just kind of nonsense.

Anyway, guys, uh...

Scotty, thank you, bro, appreciate it.

Okay guys, I hope you had...

Good stream. We going to wrap it up

bye bye bye see you guys. See you guys Thursday.