UKR-RUSSIA TRUTH (EXPOSING DISINFO) / ADAM SOMETHING IS A LIAR! [2022-03-19]
2022-03-20
Tags:
"Communism"
i floating by
i'm a slacker you are always first to act but daddy used to say that a stc ya ya ya ya there always goe to make it we never have to sak
again and's gone to break and wag just about it we justots gone to make and then have to fakgain and n's gone to breakg wajust about we just
all around the world i you believe in be there i like tody so we never see to go a spt way
every night go back with a ne house you day ya
wager ay well he the rest y
i read a magazine there at the filmver screen w about it about it
wa go
thing's going to breakg we just laug about it we just laugh about it
we
the sstans of s ofsistans of bces of profss and sal
hm
all rods are of gln ving no ence
i'm trapped insad my heir i'm trapped insad my he wile balancing the air undertrol thkpordsmen through mn
sixports went through my
i'm trapped inside my head no i've got nowhere to go got nowhere to go
y haaty haty paty
mom loves me f come dom how
he don't love me no more he don't love me no more and i'm so coling i'm so colin i'm so colin
i regular don't put me in no box i ain't baking out fro nothing icecan and no os i forced suprema and goust some cheese and yo ho want me to hit it till it cream no ice cream got a mek a filly sauce tarkr up on four eggs not a bitch filly bot and the first time you asked me for some breades when you lost you attempt to take my blesses but a i'm a foreign whips on my es
t ty to cut my little bit so she tight so we don't get this money and iug put that on by o no shit b little fives nm on my gy hear i'm talking the phone to my s wire tile to my curent t in't want to hear to see song sy i'm talking fext to no one shit i brough it back b wll do my bone to cok sche she had he hey guys
we're going to watch the news
we're soliciten to the order of events
i'm going to expose this piece of shit adam something then we're going to cover news then we're going to watch the flints debate
time
ten
good more
by oh no shit love f
be
thank
time
hear
on the phone in my s wire i title
ty
st with me thet
problemly if i click it
problem give up pull it i'm a fine
w
of it
celia be mad
moe i don't go out all my song i'll be making
ham like white but we made sheep mot goto mikae irrors but i dive by believe i think this sh was possible thank for big chi bk to city we got smoked like a shep would have thought i was a be but the way i gave be
but
thank
time
ten
good moye
by me oh no shitboy love f
be
thank
time
here
on the phone in my be wir i on title
w hear these songs li
yold jackson what's up
thank you radical leftist
wance you guys to understand you don't understand you really fuck and don't you just don't write no matter what i say it doesn't fuck and matter
it gos over your fucking head can you guys tell me what a lie is what is a lie l i e what is a lie it doesn't matter does it matter anymore we live in the post truth era truth does not matter no one actually cares about truth
all people care about is authority and power people don't respect the language of truth they have completely you guys think i'm just saying that that's what really gets to me is it's how you know you guys really think i'm just saying that and i'm just sitting here saying i'm complaining about truth but really
i'm talking about some bias type of no i'm talking about the sky blue level of truth and it doesn't fuck and matter anymore and that's what really drives me insane can yous tell me i'm not signaling you my partisan position i'm not signaling to your buckan ideology i'm talking about black and
right truth i'm really talking about right and right truth i'm talking about that level of fucking lying
ok
it's like
doesn't fucking truth matter
at all
maybe if you get away with a small lie it doesn't matter but this is a pretty fucking big lie
for a guy who almost has one million subscribers
and this already seven hours ago it has ten thousand likekes ok that's ten thousand likekes
ok
so i'm trying to ask you
does truth
you know the reason i'm saying this guy's dic whenever i was in your shoes whenever i was watching in your shoes guys and i'd watch
influencers or streamers or celebrities or politicians complain about lies and truth i always thought you know what
they're coping because every lie has a grain of truth in it
right there's got to be a grain of truth
and i'd be like okay he's talking about lies but it's not literal it's not really a literal lie
well this is a literal lie
this is a fucking literal lie
i don't know how to fucking tell you that our enemies are just
you know p i'm so glad putin coined the term empire of lies
because that is exactly what we're up against here we are up against an empire of lies and adam ththing has made a lot of videos about the ukraine russia conflict and this piece o shit scum bag this fucking lying dirt bag piece of shit
c i a shill
you're going to see his
fense of commitment to the truth just in this post so whatever you've seen from his videos just assume
that he regards the ukraine russia conflict with the same level
of
lying right
he regards it with the same level of chliice disregard for the facts
and outright lying as he does
his description
of this plan debate we were going to have
and that's why this is really important this isn't just about him lying just about this
when someone lies about something like this it's they're going to lie about other things too right
m
and this actually is a reflection of the rest of his videos about the ukraine russia conflict among other things now let's talk for a minute about adam something
so this is a you know one million subscriber andy he was clearly astro turfed clearly fed shit
right
ah he made a video about elon musk and he's basically represents every soy male
liberal um you know couck whatever fucking beta mail
a
yeah
and whatever you want to fuck and call it right these are basically just
you know these nerdy kids in high school and college who are like political science nerds
and they the they just rule following people whatever we don't have to get into it right
so ok
i want to just walk you guys through this so i'm going to pretend i'm going to be has and i'm going to be a neutral audience
and we're going to
guys you sld care about facts and shoul care about the truth so let's just walk through this right
am i really that scary
this is what he opens it with am i really that scary
i don't know well what does he mean by that he made this whole post
nine point seven thousand likes
and he's saying am i really that scary what does he mean by that
i was supposed to do a twov do debate
on the russian invasion with destiny on modern day debate
arguing against russia supporters tankies
first our opponents
we're supposed to be two you tubers
an assad apologies grriftter and a very short very insecure
arabic
man who compensates for his lack of manhood with screaming
so
just
this is not that important here wright
because whatever this is just
your typical fucking um personal attacks
which aren't really personalt tacks because you know they're just they fall flat i mean assad apologist grifter
yeah you're just basically
that's just like a very morally loaded accusation that and grifter meet means nothing right then a very short
m
i don't even know what the relevance of that is supposed to be isn't this supposed to be like a serious you tuber
oh
makes documentaries about fucking serious topics like
even if i was very short
you know if i was the world's shortest man in the guinness world book of records
like what does that have to do with anything is that supposed to speak poorly on my character that i'm the shortest guy in the entire world and i mean the comedy is that i'm actually just five eight which is like
the average height in hungary which is where adams something comes from and that's just the funny part of it is that i'm really not very short right
but i mean just like ok assuming i'm the shortest man in the whole world
in the guinness book of world records
like
route
what're you trying to say
right is this supposed to speak poorly on my character
did you look that up no i actually just guessed because most hungarians i met are pretty short
i just assume that they're on the shorter side i could be wrong i actually could be wrong
m
yeah i don't know it doesn't it doesn't matter you're right it really doesn't fuck it matter i don't know why you'd mention this then he wases very insecure
okay based on what
based literally on what i'm pretty sure all of like
my nit picking
about getting the facts straight about like my personal appearance in my life
have been to prove that i was not insecure
in other words like the whole stop the tilt thing ok fifty per cent was a mem fifty per cent was also to prove that i never lied about my height
wasn't the proof that i wasn't short
that's i guess subjective it was to prove that i never lied about it right because if i lied about it that would mean i'm insecure i just
want to get the record shet that i don't fucking lie right
then this is my favorite part
arabic
arabic
average mail in hungry's five ten ok whatever
i'm two inches shorter than the average in hungry
by the way i don't even buy that because that's you know
i just don't buy it
they say in lebanon it's like
all too it's not true
they they did go to the cities and
you know
the countryside is shorter than cities typically i don't actually i don't know who cares right
but this is the most this is a more important part
is
arabic
so this is
this is like ok so he talks about very short very insecure these are like negative things right
and then he says arabic
and
he puts a question mark
again i don't know what the significance of being very short is supposed to be
a it's interesting that you like you highlight that is somehow significant very insecure
uh
i don't know why you're calling me very insecure i mean what exactly should i be insecure about
a an arabic
so apparently you know it speaks poorly on my
character that i'm you know this is actually something a lot of alt right people like to do so i am actually like a white passing guy sometimes or at least like i guess a european passing or caucasian passing whatever you want to fuck and call it
and whenever people find out i'm an arab they like toy use it as a smear
they're like you're an actual arab haz you're brown haz it's like a stain it's supposed to be some kind of stain so let me put this on fuck and record let me put this
on fuck and record right now
i want to put this on record right now
game
just so everyone knows that it's not a secret
and i'm putting it on record
right now right
i'm putting it on record right now
ok
because people seemed to be fucky confused
about this
are you ays confused
you're arabos your brown
right
and i'm supposed to i'm supposed to like that's supposed to be a stain on me right
that's supposed to be a stain something i'm supposed to be ashamed of right
so let me put it
let me make it a matter of public record just so everyone is clear
i am white passing i am caucasian but this is supposed to be an insult right so let me be fucking very something i'm talking to you right now mother falker by the way i'm talking to you
ready
i'm talking to you adam something i'm solet me make this very very fucking clear i don't want to have the police call i'm just getding keep it down right want to make this very clear let me be very fucking clear
adam something i'm an arab my father was an arab his father was an arab his father before him was an arab and his father before him was a fuckan arab as a matter of fact the's not an ounce of me that's not fucking arab i'm one hundred percent a fuckan arab one hundred percent of my blood is arab one hundred percent of my
soul is arab my skin is arab my bones are arab my organs are arab my heart is arab my brain is arab every fucking aspect about me is arabic and is arab you understand and i'm not just an arab i'm an arab with a capital a
i'm an arab i'm an arab of half i said i'm an arab you know the arabs that fought in ar is that type of fucking arab you understand let's be very fucking clear that my family s the fight people in lebanon wh said we
weren't arabs that we were phoenicians and we were pure and we were europeans fuckt arabs that's what we fucking are i am an arab every fuckt aspect fiber and so of my is arabic and you think this is something i'm ashamed of or this is something up swept under the fuck and rug and that's
supposed to be an insult against me fucking what swept it under the rug i've never swept it under the fuck and rug the's not a fuck and single part of my ancestry that isn't fuck and errab every fucking aspect of who i am is erra of every single aspect adam something you adam something
you think i'm ashamed of that adam something
insecure arabic like that's a stain like that's a stain i want to ask a question just it's a description of events that's all the w in two thousand and six was it the arabs the ar in two thousand and six just curious i'm just putting it out there adam something
that's that's the land i originate from in my blood in my soul every fiber of
my being is that in the war war comes again just like the war in ukraine
they're going to be carving ziz on the streets of lunan
that's all i have to tell you fuck and pussy little bitch
that's a promise
that's a promise
so let's clear the air and get that part out of the way
let's clear the air
and git that part out of the fuckin way
like this is supposed to be a fucking insult
and you're a pure european riight adam something
you're a pure european and me i'm a i'm an arab and i should be ashamed of that
that's a stain on my character
that's supposedly a stin on my character
he used to be an alt writer which is really interesting
used to be an old writer which is really interesting
i just want to know like where did this idea come from that i'm hiding my background i'm hiding what i am
so he goes
and the this is my favorite part we're not even done with this
who compensates for his lack of manhood with screaming
his lack of manhood
so adam something must be a really tough man he must be a really really you know real man right
this is a real man we're talking about
so
i wonder
okay
is there a way we can evaluate adam something's manhood so first of all
they sound like a little pussy they sound like a bitch right there's nothing wrong with that
and they have a very feminine voice when i hear them talk i mean i'll give you an example of one of their videos
so this is what a real man sounds like first right so this is what a man sounds like everyone so as you might have heard russia has invaded ukraine
full scale all directions with the full use of their sounds like a pedophile playing mind graft trying to learn children
oh
y he sounds like some fucking weird creep
sounds like some fuck and creek
arsenal this video is in analysis of the current situation in you it's bey inanity sod like a little bitch right but maybe that's just deceptive and you know
maybe the voice is deceptive and it's just
you know
what you sound like and you're really a really real man when we take a good look at you
we're goninga see what real manhood looks like right
that's what i'm assuming
but i'm assuming right
because
he claims
that i
don't have any manhood
adam somepthing claims that i don't have manhood right so
this must be a guy who's who's you know a real authority on what is and isn't a man
right he's got to be this is got to be a real authority on manhood
since i'm not a man this is a real authority on manhood right
ladies and gentlemen
adam something
this is the guy remember let's go back
his's lack of manhood
this is a guy talking about others manhood
this is someone talking about someone else's manhood
this is someone who's trying to talk about my manhood i was a question guys let's say me and adam something were in a room together
let's say we were in a room together me
os
and adam something
would he look me in the eyes
and say
you don't have manhood
just take a guess what do you do that
why not i'm really short aren't i i mean i'm like five one or four five
so i'm really really short right so he wouldn't have a problem doing it right
because he has a million he's willing to tell his one million subscribers this that
i compensate for my lack of manhood
right
so if i was in a room with him would he look me dead in the eye and tell me that to my face
yeah i'm going to watch the flints debate after we cover the news
he would look down but yes oka sure
you really think that you would tell me that to my face would you tell it to my face by the way
that's how i don't know i the even if i was five four or five five
i'm still bigger than you
i'm still more massive than you
i still have more to show than you i could still probably beat the fuck out of you if i want i would eever do it it's not legal
yeah
you know
ah that's the truth
some of the scariest people in my life i used to go to a gym and there used to be a guy who's
like five five and he's a wall
he's a wall he was this wide
i stayed away from him
and he was on royd's he was jacked up and i'm i'm not talking about like a he was an old guy he was in prison and
he was just like a combination of fat and giant in jacks
and he was terrifying
even those people you don't fuck with
so me i don't take royd's right i got a natural physique
you would not come to me in person saying this shit
even if you're right about my height you still wouldn't
a five seven you have c fire slep the set six one guy no height means something in a fight
it does
each is important
oh he that he would look down oka
whatever
something tells me he would not so much as insult me to my face something tells me he would not so much
as attempt to insult me to my face
i don't know
so these are the people that are now running around on the internet
talking about other people's manhood and talking about all that shit right
so let's continue
with screaming
now here's the important part
remember adam's a scary guy he said am i really that scary this is a scary guy right
this is a scary scary guy we haven't even gotten to the meat and potatoes here
scary out of right
shortly after i accepted the debate
they cancelled
ten thousand likes
they cancelled
ten thousand likes
they cancel
ten thousand likeks
they cancelled
ten thousand likes
they cancel
ten thousand likes
this isn't my side of the story
this isn't another perspective
this isn't another opinion
this isn't
oh this is just hars's view
this is black and white
this is black and white
this is a matter of truth or falsehood
did we cancel
or did we not cancel
show d ms to prove it
i will
but better yet
i don't even have to show the ups
i can just show this to you
even better
even better
ready
modern day debate themselves
i asked dylan burns if adam something could take his place
and dilan burns was open to it because he's burning the wick at both ends
we couldn't get adam in on this one
so original plan is on
anyone who listens to this idiot needs to get some help hey swarm you stupid little pussy you fucking little bitch you little fucking pussy you fucking bitch you want to know why people fucking listen to me because they see people with a million fucking subscribers lie in say shit like this with ten thousand fucking likes and they come in my fucking channel
and they see
this
that it's directly a fucking lie
and guess what focking happens
they
trust me more suddenly they see me as a source of truth
and they can't trust these big streamers and these big fucking contentrators because they're fucking liars and even you
even you are seeing that he lied and that he's a fucking liar
he has one million subscribers i have twenty thousand followers and he's a fuking liar and that is a fact with god as my fucking witness with god as my fucking witness with god as my fucking witness let me spontaneously combust into fire
if he isn't a fuckon liar
with god as my falking witness he's a falking liar
and you don't have to take my word for it that's the best part
you don't have to take my word for it
don't have to take my willingness to believe this for it because this is modern day debate themselves we couldn't get atam on this one
but we cancel
there's more
maybe you're going to say has maybe the reason you couldn't git him on
is because ah you
were the ones who wum
who who insisted he couldn't come on ok
this is what we were presented with
adam something
what we want dylan burns to moderate all wes said was dylan can't be involved
period no dylan
that's it
i have no idea why he would even be involved or why he would co host anything so they wanted bas you has heard it when it happened right so adam something came on
and all he said was dylan can't be involved
no dylon i've no idea why he's involved
jaggsd agreed he said no problem we can keep it the same as originally planned i let delan know
the same as originally planned being we're going to debate adam something
g
and then on stream i announced we're going to be debating adam something you guys saw the streams and i talked about this i talked about how didylon pussied out and wanted to moderate it we said fuck no
remember when i said dillon pussied out and we replaced him with adam something
so at what point
did we cancel let's see
let's check the d ms maybe we canceled somewhere in these fucking d ms
me find it
here it is
ca
ar is
let me just make sure there's no like doking or anything like that oka
re it is
there you go okay here it is
dylan can't be involved agreed no problem we can keep it the same
three p m
perfect
you could do modern day debate i sympathet we're just talking about the title
and then yeah
so i don't want to leak the zoom
but
it's just the zoom thing and it says joined now
and if you since you don't believe me i'll literally just
mark can i do that
me try
s message
doing now
can i leve
is there a way to cover it
we see
take this image
its image
yeah i can't i can't touch the image
move this
hey it doesn't matter if you don't believe me i'll i'll
can i show the zoom in the pass code will it like be a problem it won't be a problem
ok sot me show you ready
here
there it is
that's it that was the rest of itgame
now let me show you my personal d ms with modern day debate
you just make sure there's no docxing anything like that
ok here it is this is literally it
so this was
before we were discussing it was going to be destiny maybe destiny said sure yah that could work whatever
some other debate
there you go let's just say atack
we're i'm in now so there you go
jackson i'm sure would be willing to leak his personal dms as well
so it's kind of weird at no point
did we cancel on adam something whatsoever
so
if you're a hods hater and you're an adam something fan
he john
i want to talk to you john
this is personal i'm directly talking to you
and john just to make just to make it clear to you you don't have your twitter mob to help you here so first of all i want to show you what's going on here socially you don't have the social validation you have on twitter so john one's in the chat
if john is a little bitch
one's in the chat if he's a little bitch john i want to show you what real social validation looks like
a lot of people john
it's a lot of people that are saying you're a little bitch
maybe you stumbled into the wrong place cause your twitter friends aren't here john
on i want to tell you another thing
you will fucking lose
your side is going to lose
your side is going to lose
john
your side is going to lose
you're a little bitch you're scum you're a coward
and you won't fuck and win you want know why
because we have the truth on our side it's that fucking simple we literally just have the truth on our side this is a black and white struggle
between the empire of lies and the forces of truth
and it is literally that fucking simple you little bitch you fucking pussy i want you to go to bed knowing os called you a pussy there's nothing you can do about it you're a failure and you're a little bitch i want you to go to bed knowing that
i want you to go to bed knowing that
this is literally
a battle between truth and falsehood
lies
and truth
it's
there is no debate there is no perspective there is no opinion
there is no two sides of the story
he lied and said we cancelled we did not cancel
he canceled
he canceleed
not us
it's that fucking simple
he claimed we canceleed
and that this makes him very scary
to prove it to you
to prove it to you
ugly fat
ugly pedophile fat fuck in my chat you ugly fat disgusting
walk
the'll prove it to you though
the prove it to you
i will debate adam something
any time he wants
or i should say any time of any day of the week he wants
i will debate adam something
literally any day of the week i will debate him right now
are you that scary adam something
so here's what we should do guys
hey adam
am i really that scary
that you
you would fabricate
the lie
that we canceled on you
am i really that scary
that you won't
debate me and are still
running
way
to this day
i know how you
also
are you
a man
adam something
i couldn't tell
yeah
so what we're going to do
is we're going to boost this to the very top
we're going to like this
this common
so he could see
here's the link
like this
we're not going to race you obviously not thisre ten thousand blinks
just make sure he sees it
finally
check this out before we do that though
i want you to read
the willing brainwash soldiers of the empire of lies i want to show you what fucking disgusting scum and liars these people are
it's a common thing for propagandists to cancel debate invites
for example in russia
nevanni oh really it's common
you scared them shitless
and well educated well informed smart ass with a sense of humor is debate kryptonite for the grifters
it's that you deradicalize withhich points
that are backed by examples
there's good chances you won't change their views but of the audience who follows them
it's because you are european
the usual american viewpoints are falling when the guys had to debate someone who was from europe and from a former soviet influence country
the terrified you will give them they're all talking about the reasons
for why me and jackson cancelled on the debate
the only problem is that we never actually cancelled on any fucking debate whatsoever so this video is going on the you tube and my editor olive i want you to hear me for this part
i want you to preserve this part because these stupid dumb fuck brain dead pieces shit scum commenters deserve to live in shame for the rest of their fucking lives we are documenting in real time a fucking circus we are documenting in real time a fucking circus
let's read these comments guys
let's read these comments
ready
let's go let's have some fun with this guys let's go honest to god i've never seen destiny research as much as this debate it may have scared them off you're actually east european so you can represent regional political viewpoints better than they can lie about them i think it's the combination of you knowing what you're talking about
your accents being obviously eastern european area means they are outmatched might be too scary because you're actually good at debating no idea though
pankees are scared of getting absolutely railed maybe it's because in order to debate tankeyes you have to have their exact education history no more no less
looking out for the top commons there was more with like a thousand lights probably being scared of debating in eastern europe
pm adam hasn't even begun his debate proark and his opponents are already quivering in their boots
you may have to pull off a sam seter and just drop in on them you're like ben shapiro too scared to debate somebody that actually has debate skills
now this this is one of his beta male fans that are like i'm short in the herb too you hurt my feelings
this is what i love about and what i love about people who attack me for my height is it doesn't make me insecure it makes like at least fifty per cent of your audience insecure like i'm pretty sure like what thirty to fifty per cent of men are below five nine something like that i think it's thirty right thirty per cent of men are below five nine so it's like
you're literally just like shitting on one third of your audience by calling me like this extremely short guy or whatever when i'm only five eight like imagine the people in your audience who are like just five five dudes or five four dudes there's a lot of dudes who are five four five five more than you think and you're literally just and they're all live like it doesn't it's not something that's ideological there's liberal short guys there's tanky
short guys guys want to know why i do this because i'm destroying their morale and therefore i'm destroying one third of the males in their fucking audience one third of their army is wiped out by hos because they have to do all these short jokes that applies to one third of their entire male audiencely fucking wiped out
it's just easy this is actually a great compliment for adam look at an burns who knew it was a fucking lie burns knew this was a fucking lie to adam it's simply because they wanted to debate someone with
youthful vigor like me you literally know this i'm i'm going to fuck and do that but guys you know you want to find wlling burns comment in this and yeah what a fucking lyining piece of shit look at this lying piece of shit in the fucking comments lying
so i'm gona go take a piss i'll be right back i'm goinga go take a piss be right back
ah
member how dylan burns also lied and said that we also canceleed on him and that he forced him to adopt these new terms of debate of changing the title when they were never forced whatsoever and that if you ever once implied that that was a condition for debating us would have just been like a ppkt all we did was ask them
to change the title we never said like that's a condition for debating him and he's the one who actually pitched out and said no he's not debatd
so
start us chat about a roll through why
why
what are you talking about
she's talking shit
gate
what does startterst want
she wants to debate me ok call debatter tllr to get in my v c all debatter
you didn't sochoke you
tller to get in my v c
fll this orbiter to get in my vcs
thank you victory will come
i couldn't because i couldn't watch it lie
that's why
short tiny man
they have nothing
they literally have nothing
they literally have nothing
do'es no why
he b like a horse
why do you even entertain
when your enemies
talk sht about your height
because they don't talk about anything else
it's not like they talk about my beard they literally don't talk about it's not like they talk about my positions or my arguments
they like
put it this way
the only thing my enemies talk about
is the fact that i'm five eight
which is not that's all
but that's all they talk about that's literally all they don't have any arguments
they don't have any substance they never actually bring anything up
that is like meaningful in any kind of fucking way
so like what do you want me to do w am i supposed to ignore it
well then why do they keep they keep like ok should i ignore every single enemy that i have then
that
here's start us
what a fuck you want
hello
yeah what do you want
but are you the father
go haad say your joke
are you
go ahead and tell your joke
i don't have a joke
you' used low today what do you want
that what's up did you see my tweet
no
oh it's been two weeks here let me link it to you
i'll just link you the clip itself here
ok
here you go
did you get it
want to ask a question ok if in weeks
moscow doesn't have
people on the ground in kiv hasn't taken the city
what are you going to say what's the reason for that
if i was i would say things did not go as planned then
in what sense
that they they failed to execute their goals probably
want to ask a question
them
what's your point
i'm just saying it's been two weeks
yeah well
i didn't
what do i mean to say clearly the operations much longer than expected
that i expected
i have admitted that
okay all right well just wanted to you know just wanted to check how come uh how come you won't you won't uh fist fight me
ps
i've been i've been challenging you since day one ok
and i know
i know you're jealous of my girthiness ok but there's no nothing to be jealous of
if you eat enough
you can reach my level of girth
hello
did you want to debate about something
h not really
why aren't russian troops in kiev
no
they're outside
oh so when they were reporting that like these
russian spec ops guys or whatever were in t of that was a lie
i'd have to look into that but i don't believe that's true
so
it's interesting ukrainians lie
m
yeah well i mean i think uh i think
what that
russian t can see say you didn't whyyea it isn take the interior of kiev yet but they've have it fully surrounded and can pretty much take it whenever they want
the should just take it then
well
that would
probably di't danger a lot of civilians
they didn't give a fuck about that with piarson did they
m example
they're destroying infrastructure
which is they're pretty much starving like
they're starving ukrainian cities by destroying
infrastructure
which infrastructure
if you ight talk about the hospital in the the
the school
hospitals basically were running the water electricity and also the fater in mariople right
well yeah but i'm talking about just like
well that it was that did russia did russia blow up the theater in mariopl by the way
look
i'm talking about about electricity and water right
there are people who don't have access to running water
on people who don't have access to electricity i believe in maripol
people are like burning pieces of furniture just to keep warm
so it's a it's a little bit fucked yeah people are is is cutting off water the same as killings and having no regard for civilians
it's a slow killing
okay so then okay i have to ask you a question
when crimea cut off water and electricity sorry when ukraine cut off water and electricity from crimea for eight years
was that a slow killing
was it for eight years
yes
do they have access to electricity and water from other places
they only did because of russia
all right and and russia already had
had h annexed it right
yeah but they still really couldn't get water because they dammed up
could they or could they not get water
no
i mean
their access to water was severely limited
ok
well why should ukraine provide water and electricity
to a town
or not town but to it a region where
russia has annexed
i don't know but why should russia
not cut off water and electricity
which is vital for the
because it's as militias that are there currently fighting
it's ukraines
it is not just the as of
um uh militia that they're fighting they're they're fighting
civilians
which civilians are they fighting
and they well they're bombing the
they're bombing buildings right
ing strikings let's be precise about this
i mean
there are residential buildings that have been
bomb there are hospitals that have been bombed
which hospital
i can't name every single one but here
well there's obviously the maternity one the maternity hospital right that which was the news recently
on the one in mariople
h oh
did russia do that
yea why you think they didn't
i'm just curious as to like what evidence you have that it was russian
um do you have evidence otherwise
well that's not really how it works when you accuse someone of a crime you have to actually establish the're the ones who so there's been reporting that that's what it is right
you really not know
i mean
explain to me if it's all if if they're if it's different then explain it to me
the maternity hospital
anne mariol
mmhmm
you know about the nature of the
collision
i sorr you know the nature of explosives that come from
air to surface
and the nature of how that actually destroys buildings and what that looks like
i don't but this starting to sound like like ninehunred eleven truth or stuff
ok
so
you know i guess that's what it is then
i mean look i don't know a whole lot about what so basically what are you just si like whatever you saw on twitter
n on twter
and that wt do b
ight
let's say russia didn't do it
in
marriel
how would russia be able to defend itself
against the claim
um
without being able to like analyze the nature of
if russia din't it did
russia accuses
the i can't say this but russia accuses it of being staged
a staged
yap
ok
a maternity hospital
bombing staged
can i ask you question why would russia
bomb a maternity hospital what's what interest does russia have to bomb a maternity hospital
they have used the tactic where they will destroy infrastructure in the past
'm in other conflicts yeah ok
so you work by attrition right yeah you're trying to say like oh this is what they did in grosney ok
then why isn't russia you would
think that they're doing this at a go much higher scale that you don't just have these one examples you have like dozens of examples where they're doing this like
and may ho
i mean there it's not hit
why russia bombing more hospitals than that one
they have taken out like i said they've taken out electricity and they've taken out water that's already enough to put people in a very desperate situation but we're talking about their bombing of civilian infrastructure
mmhm
so why aren't they doing that at the same
like a much higher level of scale
then these like sensationalized single events which russia denies
well i know that there are um
having um
basically
they're having trouble with u they're like running out of of supplies essentially so
i know that they're trying to be
strategic and
whary are you saying russia is running out of bombs and that's why they can't buy i don't know if itust bombs but there are there what would it be because you have in order to bomb hospital you rather going to use
ground to ground missiles
are sorry surface to surface missiles or you're going to use
aircraft
right and i'm not sure exactly what they've run out of to be able to do that let me take a quick look i was just reading something have you chat help you that's usually what all the other
well no we we read articles um
let me see here i
putin underestimated the national pride and battlefield skills that ukrainians have built up over the past eight years
you see ah
ukraine keeps like securing all these victories closer and closer to key it's crazy
uh i don't know about that i mean i mean kerson and and mari paol are not doing great right now so
i thought the ukraine the valor of the ukrainians was holding the russians back
but it's not like you said right it's not going as quickly as putin anticipated no it's not going as quickly as i thought it
okay
there have been tons of there have been tons of experts who weighed in who said that
cooton
uh was expecting this to be done in a certain amount of time and it wasn't first estimate was like forty eight hours the next one was like
a week two weeks you know so well the forty eight hour one came from the idea that putin was just going to steamroll ukraine
regardless of minimizing casualties to civilians and harm to civilian infrastructure
which had nothing to do with the nature of the special operation itself
oky
special operation in myd what the americans were saying
was that russia
was going to launch a full scale invasion
of ukraine
and a full deployment which basically implies
they're just going to roll through it like blidscreen style right
and that's not what we've seen we've seen a very surgical and
incissive
procedure
of choking off
ukrainian cities
the resistance that's situated within them
and taking over
with his little violence as possible
it's very methodical
i
um so this claim that it was staged is
not correct
um
there's tons of footage of the of the maternity hospital
um
also there is w
wo who world health organi just a second just a second world health organization confirms eighteen attacks on ukrainian hospitals and ambulances creating the worst possible ingredients for spread of disease
ya i trust the who but
m
what i'm trying to say is that the
no one is denying the hospital was destroyed in mariople
mmhmm
we're talking about how it was destroyed
okay eighteen attacks on ukrainian hospitals and ambulances you asked me if it was mo if
if why wouldn't they be attacking more they are attacking more
can you name the other eighteen or can we explore those
i can't name them off the top of my head but the world health organization has confirmed it
so eighteen attacks
so it's just a matter if we trust the who
you just said that you trust the holl
i'm obliged to trust them
because they have a blue check mark
oka
do so do you or do you not trust them because you just said five minutes ago you trust them and now you're saying you're only because they have o
okay
are you kidding
in want to get banned
ok i'm sorry i didn't realize that that was the thing
um
ok
so
what exactly did you want to debate about
i wanted to ask you why you won't fight me
that's it
pretty much i mean also i wanted to ask you about the playf but you didn't really you didn't really say anything
no eighteen confirmed attacks by the who
the infrastructure being damaged all around ukraine and
and
is the the byetritan
ok is there evidence that russia is deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure if so please provide
concrete examples
i mean there's footage of civilian infrastructure
having been attacked
i remember in the very early stages of this
there was footage
of a residential building that got shot
and it turned out
that it was actually a ukrainian
a surface to air
missile defense system
that misfired
and like it was proven through the projectile and everything
and russias still got the blame
i remember another example when there was a supposed bombing of kiev
sorry harkve i forget which city it was
when actually it was a downed ukrainian plane that just fell and crashed into the middle of the you evidence for these things can you provide them to me
sure wh do you want me to provide them
you can dedamn them to me
hey guys if you guys remember which ones put them in fact checking
so i could just link them to her
kind of eating right now
ok so you can lookt the one from the very early
days of the conflict where
the building that first building that got hit
that was a miss fire from ukraine's missile defense system
the other one
was the ukrainian plane that got down the middle of ukrainian city
do you have the name of the building
no it was just a random residential building
or the name of the guy who accidentally fired a missile
why would i have the name of a random ukrainian soldier
well because i don't know you asked me for
for all these specifics so i figured id ask you
i asked you for specific events not
nam was
of people uh huh
where are the sources from
i'm not seeing anything in fact checking by the way nothing's happening
so
i guess i'll have to dig through my tweets
oh it's a twitter it's a tweet didn't you just come at me for saying oh it wll you know you re do you just read through twitter when i don't read through twitter but ok if you want to source tweets that's fine you know that we has the footage are you talking about
which we just as the p
count
there's no footage in this tweet
i didn't provide any tweet
ok well you told your chat to
to put stuff in fact checking rather than sending me stuff right
so i just clicked on it i don't see anything
so the well clearly they either don't remember or don't have it on hand
so that's w so you can't prove what you were claiming n i can't ok start us i am literally in my likes right now and i'm just scrolling down i'm on march ninth nw so i'm going to keep scrolling down till i find
thank
okay alright i appreciate that
that's literally what i'm doing right now
so
no just wait
okay
you want to come on a chaos cast sometime ok it is here it is here it is this is it
this is the first one this is the what date was this
yeah this was twenty sixth of february okay
so this is one of th pieces of evidence right here someone finally provided it
this was this one
i
so they reported that a gear residents that was hit by a missiles firing rages yeah
okay
ok and this was actually a ukrainian missile defense system
which was blamed on russia
amm
se it and
there's there was i don't know if a s b as b currently got banned
so i'm going to try to find the footage of the projectile
like
ot where it was hit from and the projectile
which proves that it was from a ukrainian missile defense system and not from russia
okay
isbes on gabria
you guys can't find it first just post it
yeah the b u k m one exactly that's
yeah here it is here it is here it is
as be report on but they got
taken down that's why ne could find it
could you wanle get taken gown
re could you because there's a massive campaign of censorship against the
fro russian sources
and you are
in you archive that as v thing on way back machine isn't on way back
on no
because they actually proved it
i'm looking at this al jzazeer article that somebody linked
yeah the al jazeera article blamed on russia because that's
when it first hit everyone blamed it on russia then it was later shown
it b from a b uk missile defense system
ok on i'm sure guys link i you on the telegram and get it from their telegram
i'm sure that
that there are i'm sure that there are cases especially in wars and conflicts like this
where
where there's friendly fire and i'm sure it's unintentional and
but i or you know i'm not sure but
i'm sure it's unintentional
i still the i still don't
i still don't think even even if this is it has been done by ukrainian forces
i still don't think that
that can erase the massive amount of damage that you see all over ukraine o it will not but we're talking about looking for evidence of intentional attacks against civilian infrastructure
that's what this is about
it was a ukrainian missile defense firing at a russian missile a b u k m one
so it was so it was in defense against russian a russian missile
and it and it hit a residential building
which was blamed on russia
yes because a missile from russia was it was in defense against that the missiles from russia was striking military targets
not civilian
within why would
a residential
is all explain there was literally footage
so there's an r
every surface the surface missile has an arc
or service their missile
it's a projectile right
you shoot it up into the air
and then there's an r
through the sky
they
so this one was meant to hit an airplane or something
right
and instead
it hit a tall building
because it missed
mm
theres youtube video in fact checking
it hill it hit its yeah therek
missile defense system and the missile
hit the residential building
ok
so
you can see here
miss the missile rush a fired
yeah this came down
pheasant re
so it arc
over
right
it was a surface to air missile that arc
and then
basically took this trajectory
uh do you think that um
h jet fuel can melt steel beams
was
so
what is your argument then
um h so my argument is that even if it was friendly on fire even
why does your ask me a and you i mean because you're not answering you're not for you're not answering i am i'm about to answer you and answer let me answer ok
um so you asked me
what what am i what am i guess what i'm here for or what i'm trying to say
s even if even if i that't why interrupted you because you're not actually talking about
why are you sing
hy are you saying do et why do you saying jets fuel melts steel being oh my god not has let me answer the question first
no you already said you already said that even if it was true that this was a ukrainian missile you already made that argument i don't want to hear it again
i want to hear
why specifically you're talking about nine eleven truthism because
it sounds like from your side of the aisle every time you're confronted with an actual argument
you you basically your rebuttal is always like well this sounds like something i deem ridiculous what doesn't even if it's
correct
that this sounds like nine eleven truthism
it doesn't actually talk about its actual merits like you're not actually arguing with what i'm saying
and then when i have' f you know when i confront you with that not then start us i when i do't front you with that you start i'm saying do start us on when i can on do and i confront you o right then go ahead and s yet that you thatf that is my argument you say even if so when i confront you on that
you wrote back and you go well even if it's true hold on
let's not do that even if it's true
let's go back to that that
this jet fuel melt steel beams thing because you're trying to compare this
the nine eleven truthism
what is the significance of that are you hung up on it
are you really hung up on a choke
yeah
am dude that is that's kind of sad
well it just like little joke
then to be all your side has when it comes to you can't actually seriously debate this topic
no i i can and again
it still doesn't explain
the massive amount of damage in ukraine
right
that can't all be ukraine
no one' saying no one's saying it is but
i'm trying to say a lot of the times
things that are used as evidence of russia deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure
tend not to be
sometimes it may be collateral damage but we don't really have any evidence
that russia is deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure that i've seen at least now if you can give me examples of this
i'm more than willing to
the seabos
was sthill ok
i know that who is saying that eighteen hospitals have been hit
o not eighteen just eighteen attacks have been on ukrainian hospitals and ambulances by russia is what the h saying
o
okay
here's also a fact check on the russian attack on mari pul maternity hospital was staged
oka
where's that and
i'm putting it in your dams
baseless attacks
let's read it
um
russian officials and conspiracy theorists are promoting the baseless claim by a march ninth bombing
the air strike killed three civilians including a child and left seventeen wounded
but online some assert the hospital nombing never took place
ok well this is immediately a straw man because even the russian ministry of defense
and the russian side well they get to the other argument later on in the article
ok they get to the other argument about the demolition that they claim it was a demolition
h they claim that the building was occupied by as of battalion there's also
um
say
um
first of all
just to be clear
russia did claim that it was being occupied and there is widespread evidence
of militias occupying theaters and schools and hospitals
using civilians as human shields there is widespread evidence of that
but russia still
doesn't consider that as ands an excuse
to endanger civilians so russ is not saying this is an excuse for us bombing the hospital
but they are denying that they bomb the hospital
they're not denying that the hospital was bombed
so the reason ok i have i have to
there's also this i just linked is captured rush pilot s on this order so it's a vill we are nowhere in this article is russia's allegation
that the nature of an air to surface missile explosion
could not possibly
was not shown in that hospital
like that's not been to bre just in this article that youres you know there's no evidence the aspital was a non operational facility used by aviighters for military sources
as social media posts and russell officials claim
the russian embassy in israel treeated an image of a military tank in front of a building to claim
the hospital is occupied by the azlviziant
our research is at belling cat a famously reliable and impartial source
um
found the photo was captured more than six miles away from the hospital
yet but the embassy didn't say
that this was that hospital they said this is an example of the widespread
occupation of civilian infrastructure by military agents ok
so the un said in a march eleventh statement the hospital was both clearly identifiable and operational when it was hit
on march second the hospital shared a facebook post asking for fuel tanks to keep the facility running
oky this is
so if this was like a research project for school this would get an f minus
cat
this doesn't
debunk anything as far as with russians claim are concerned
m
i mean keeping the hospital running
uh a facebook post
asking for more fuel i mean
that's what you're talking about here
let me get back to thats russ
captured russian pilot
says he was ordered to hit civilian targets
what does this prove exactly
what kind of evidence could i provide to you has that would change your mind
examples of russia targeting civilian infrastructure
deliberately and on a mass scale
but even just deliberately
ok so is a russian pilot saying that he was ordered to hit civilian targets not
evidence of that
no because he is a prisoner of wars start us
ok
um look i haveo it's not i reliable evidence by any standard or metric or
you know
like i don't know what to tell you
okay
um
ok so look i have chaos cast actually it starts at nine
so i do have to get going but i would love to continue this conversation with you
if you know yeah i accept your surrender don't worry
it's not surrender yeah i accept your wholesale and complete surrender of being unable to defend any of your positions on russia's intervention you and what positions andm i what did i say what russia is engaging in the widespread targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure
they have a history of doing it right
the who has said that there have been eighteen attacks on ambulances and on hospitals
we've got a russian pilot who says he was ordered to hit civilian targets
we've got tons of different you that wouldn't s you've got tons of different news s that wouldn't stand're also saying that they've been fired at that they've seen a
russian forces firing at civilians russian forces firing at
reporters
so yeah i think that there is plenty there i would love to continue this conversation with you know but i have you have yar say you have a prisoner of war
finally you have the who's claim
uh and
who said it only get worse we have eighteen confirmed attacks
though who actually has not attributed responsibility
soley to russia for these attacks as far as this c b s article is concerned so you are wrong about that
you you have to understand that there's also hospitals in the dawn bass
a and indoniatsk in lugans which is being shelled
and there is evidence of the shelling of civilians and civilian infrastructure by the ukrainian military there
how many of the hospitals being attacked are in the dawnbas
and are being shelled by russia sorry by ukrainians
i think ukrainians are in a defensive a
that is not what i'm asking amission right now right
no
they've been attacking the dawn bass
for over eight years
they just
shot a missile into a civilian center
in the dawn bass killing twenty people which the n didn't even
bother to hear or entertain
so not the case w they shouldn't be blowing up hospitals for sure but
m
but that doesn't take away from the fact that russia is engaging in a war of attrition right so
here's a link
rs is engaging in a war of attrition
so you it for ukraine dot belling cat dot com oh boy
's a super
it super reliable
what is reliable to you what is reliable to you
i evaluate the primary sources first
just
some so if i shared with you oky what if i shared with you r t
would you come would you make a comment about it before evaluating the primary sources
i i probably would make a comment about it yeah if i'm going to be honest with you
are
are they associated with the cia i'm not aware of that
really
yeah
well
according to this belling gt is funded by u s and uktelligence contractors
that aided extremists in syria
ok
the national endowment for democracy ons belling cat
the cia officials have declared their love quote unquote for belling cab this is from foreign policy dot com
a
yeah i meaning primaries further and it ansially publish sine and any o here's plenty of footage again i' listen it a gound this sounds like a funny yousy theory but
this is the
record of the annual accounts
rum belling to belling cat
who funds belling cat
and i just think we should take a look at this right because you just decided to mock
the allegation that they're
affiliated with the cia
funded by u s intelligence
that i mocked or did i just ask a question
well you asked the question in a mocking tone right you s in a mocking i mean i laughed while i asked it but that doesn't mean a' mocking youo know i think you're i think you're attributing like intention to me that i don't have
i
i think
that
if you're looking for primary footage there's tons of it there's tons of reporters who are on the ground
who have been shot at who have footage of being shot at
by russian forces
re there reporters who have also been shot at by ukrainian forces
not that i've seen
why haven't you seen that
i don't know
why don't you asking i ever heard or seen you asked about primary sources i you're just changing
with you're just changing what you want now
right so i don't know what case of reporters being shot you're talking about but
those were actually ukrainians
we're not up to date on it
ok
they were murdered by ukrainians
okay
all right has look i would love to continue this conversation
but i actually have my panel that starts at nine o'clock again surrender accepted
no surrender no surrender yeh well i'm calling it a surrender because it is you can call it a surrender if that makes you feel better
but i will still point out to all of chat
and everybody who's listening
that i have been challenging has to a fistfight
thens like three months ago ok and this guy won't
fucking fight me and all he does
is compare my physique to a bowling ball instead of actually fight me
look potin potsicle
i
i'm not i'm not playing around ok
you don't need to be afraid if you eat enough
you can you too can have the physique of a bowling ball
ok
you should be you should be are you a comedian as well as a twitchtreamer
i don't know
b bullet
i don't know what would tell the joke i'm i'm just saying i actually appreciate how much you break the stereotype that women can't be funny
i can't tell if you're being sarcassic i'm not
you're breaking glass ceilings and breaking stereotypes
okay
h appreciated all right i'll see you later has
let's continue this talk please ok
will you promise me
yeah if you want to surrender again that's fine
you can call whatever you want haz
this is
not that but i have a mean panel to me mons
i will see you soon
gave surrender accepted
your surrender has been accepted as well thank you
no i surrender except
what a boring foxing
sae
what a literal boring fuck and com
houly shit
literal boring waste of time
oy anyway um
so
this guys
adam something
ithe has been completely discredited
proved he's a fucking liar nothing else but a fucking liar always been a fucking liar
um
all right we're goinga we have some news to cover guys we actually have some news to cover
so starting with um
we're going to do our
some telegram
stuff that i wanted to show you
just some funny stuff so the anti russian hysteria has gotten so fucking wild and out of proportion out of pocket i should say
look at this
russian cosmonauts
you'rey gagar
the first person who's been to space
has been stripped of his honors by the space foundation in light of current world events
what does your ggarn have to do with anything that's going on in ukraine
uri go garin was just a guy who went to space that's literally what he's known for he was the first man
you go this bace
he was
russian i guess
you went to space
and the
space foundation
has stripped him of his honours
to be fair
this is the most bitter but hurt response i could think of because
mean he was still in space forir you can't strip him of the honor of being in space first because he literally was the first man
to ever leave the earth's atmosphere and you can't change that by
but gagaron's no longer the fucking
first man in space because of what's happening in ukraine i mean
these people are just directly trying to fucking rewrite history
trying to completely
create this make believe fucking world
they're trying to rewrite historina
four civilians killed twenty six wounded in the dp r in the past day
according to the militia
a
mines placed by ukraine in the black sea may drift
toward the bosporous
that ki
potentially you
turkish cargo ships are international targets
cargo ships
which may trigger article five so that's a
hod situation
unconfirmed reports of the kernel the
georgian armed forces
bild in mariopool
ministry of defence of ukraine has said
that the armed forces of ukraine have lost control of the sea of asaf
they've lost control of the sea of as off apparently that's what they're saying that's pretty
game changes
russia has started using suicide drones on ukrainian positions
this is interesting
ina
nato secretary john stoltenberg said that china has an obligation as a member of the un security council
to actually uphold and support international law
enjoin the rest of the world
in condemning russia's invasion and brutal war against the ukrainian nations
what it trying to say
we' have taken note of the relevant remarks chinese people can fully relate to the pains and sufferings of other countries
because we will never forget who had bombed our embassy in the federal republic of yugoslavia
we need no lecture on justice from the abuser of international law
as a cold war remnant and the world's largest military alliance
nato continues to expand its geographical scope and range of operations
what kind of rule
it has played in world peace and stability
nato needs to have a good reflection
china told the un
to souck my nuts
ya
pretty
direct response
you know what's beautiful about the coming future guys
the you in this coming future you're going to start to see
i want to show you a cartoon that i think epitomizes this fact
you're going to start to seon
let me show you what you're going to start to see
in it's beautiful
it's just fucking
i don't know what else to call
view
you're going to start to see
this
gate
this is what you're going to start to see like
just this
the newest and stalcker carlson
you' going to see a realgnment
where you know populices in the united states are going to increasingly look to russia and china
as counter hegemonic and anti globalist political forces
which is something
we had already anticipated
years ago
and we got a lot of flack from it from jenz dong and you know
all these people who could have astro turfed us and helped us fight the liberals and shit on social media they turned they were against us they're still against us right
is having p o ws make statements in front of cameras a violation of the geneva convention
yeah but ukraine doesn't care about
mm
law is about war crimes
mean ukrainian social media was saying that we're not going to take any prisoners we're just going to kill people
they don't care right they don't care about fuck andwarz
frimes
anyway
speaking of the devil
so this is shared on twitter so i can share this i can't
and for i can't like
agree with it
but i can share it
because this is the russian embassy of the u k making this claim this is not my claim this is the russian embassy's claim
president putin
there was a network of dozens of laboratories in ukraine where military biological programs were conducted under the guidance
and with the financial support of the pentagon
luding experiments with the corona virus strains anthrax chlera and other deadly diseases
the president of russia putin is saying that
and they've provided documents which they have actually submitted
to you won
they submitted them to the un
so they've submitted everything to the u n and i hope the u n conducts a fair and impartial investigation
on whatever they've submitted
thank
speak of the devil
of
people talking shit
if you don't think a lot of the negative attention directed against me or at least most or at least a large proportion of it
the tweets and all the shit people talk about me
is just astral turf
i want to refer you to this
ok
so uus must counter russian misinformation on ukraine
with pyops
according to experts
psychological operations are tactics geared toward shaping how people perceive things
you guys have to understand none of this shit is a conspiracy
all this shit is pretty much out in the open
it's pretty much out in the open and it always has been you just have to know where to look
most actual conspiracies
that are real
are on the surface you just have to know where to look and everything's admitted
i
check fact checking for evidence of azebites taking civilians hostage
yeah i saw that one
there's this weird video which i don't know can be confirmed or not
it's just a very weird video
t me show it to you it's really weird
mh
now some are accusing this of being staged i don't know if it's staged or not
it is a little cinematic like this is like a movie villain you know like you'll see it's like it's really weird right
ah
mhm
like
the vill the villains are like you know they're playing the piano and it's
kind of like straight out of a movie
in a lot of ways
you know
hello hello
i don't know it's
yeah
the reason i don't know if it's real or not and i got to listen i got to call it when i got to call it right i'm fair and i'm impartial
and
you know i'm not going to just
say well this this would make the russian side look better
but
i don't know i mean the one thing that really is getting me is
who filded this and why was it posted
how is it posted publicly
yeah the as off patch is also strategically displayed as well
so let's be fair and impartial guys this mary very well be staged
this would be one of the only and first examples
of russia staging objects
to look better
which the ukrainian side is doing on a widespread level
um
by
you know we're going to call it how we call it
the thing is we don't even know if this is
bake or not i'm just saying
just going off of this it kind of looks a little sauc
i just it looks a little sauce right
yeah it's just a little sauce we can't confirm or deny anything
um
we also don't even know what
context for that video was
so we'll be fair
wll be fair
there is a new accusation that a russian attack on ukrainian base in mi
may hoyllave
has killed dozens as it killed dozens of soldierss it killed dozens of civilians
m
that we cannot see
come from russian fortune yeah
yeah just so you guys know that like
most of myer people are attacking me
that this is the astroalturf
revealed
s spy operation that manipulates social media military sock puppet software
creates fake online identities to spread pro american propaganda
mm
no
this is from
march two thousand and eleven
i wonder if they' ever use that against chm
i wonder if they've ever used that against hos or
jackson or any of that right
well
before we get into
more
yes
youms just like
let's have levels of comedy
ok
guts e re see this
the times reported
that
three russian cosmonauts arrived at the international space station
last night in flight suits
made in the yellow and blue of the ukrainian flag
it would appear to be a daring statement against the war
that is very
very brave of those carsmen i
very brave very brave
the problem
course is that
from twenty fifteen we can see them also protesting in favor of ukraine
i mean look
the solidarity of these russian cosmonauts
is so profound and deep
that
they were showing solidarity with ukraine
before the intervention even happened
in twenty fifteen
that's how much
they weep
for the snake island thirteen who bravely gave their lives
resisting
russia
ok
i mean they they were so mournful for the snake island thirteen that they were
mourning them before they even die
hunter suits normally yellow wall
you so if you're an average guy you may ask the question
is that what their suits normally look like
but since this is checkmark
and its coming from the times which is a legitimate and credible source
three russian cosmonauts arrived at the international space station last night in flight suits
made in the yellow and blue of the ukrainian flag
would appear to be a daring statement against the war
so you're assuming that the times had some knowledge or information that you didn't youre assuming that
this isn't their regular uniform that they're specially wearing this
new uniform to show solidarity with ukraine
except
now what you guys have to start realizing is that
stop trusting experts
because anyone can work in media you could work in media
any discord ship poster can work
for the times you just have to like
know how to spinshit a little bit and it's not like they know things that we don't
you guys understand
you know most media
it doesn't have insider sources
doesn't have primary sources that you can't access our most media actual media starting to report
witterpoles
they don't really have access to things that
anyone else you know we can all
pretty much
do the same level of reporting as mainstream media
and it would be like the same level of factual truth because most of their primary sources
are not coming from these like
special inside secret sources you know
yeah
ok that's not the funniest thing i'm going to show you all night
o
that is not the funniest thing i am going to show you allight
the funniest thing i'm gon to show you
and by the way
this is not
n i just have the shorts
fk
this is the funniest thing i'm going to show you
so what's so funny about this well
this slot
doble wach youve sem
ss a chaf to keep meanly
oor in the
just love us
us go a little more
fo
ilve said nore
my tosion she
but almost
to missionm
villnin o would the villna
ok
projigom nioa doscia o ptuvali richna
laponoa
but it is one tagenya
maintenance
on azilter national boroni
clanashaclude bodwik zavosdis volgerino
still kill lerkor not stkillke them
this w las
this is the bad as everyone's been praising for being so brave that they're not leaving and they're staying on the front lines
thank
by the way this isn't a mean this is something they actually posted the ukrainian government actually post
now
you may say has you know what it just was filmed weird and you know yeah the lighting is really off
really off
um
and it also looks weird
but
that' the cony
pusic
but but i am more
absolute of suberocraty if she popert theiata co
sorry
but the wim i'm sorry it's so unnatural looking e so unnatural but that absolutely
ok yeah look none of the weirdest part of this is like
the floor
the floor doesn't you know what i mean like look at this
this doesn't look like someone
maybe it's real
i don't know what do you guys think
this real
there's no shadows there's oh there is hod on wait a w
no wait there are shadows look at that
maybe it's real
we there's shadows
that should mean something right
this is so
you know why they don't care if it looks real or not this is the truth
i want to know why they don't care if it looks real or not
because
this is something i have learned firsthand
the majority of people are stupid his fut
you know that
the majority of people are literally dumb
no and it's
guys
did you ever hear that thing that mean where it's like
most people don't have an internal monologue is that true like
most people
don't even think to themselves
is that actually real
like most people don't even have inner thoughts
is that actually true
i dont believe it's true
red scarre wants to debate me to tell him to get in show q it's not hard to debate me you literally just have to get in show q and
give me something to debate about
some people can't imagine an apple in their head
youuys don't always have like a voice in your head do you guys always have like
in internal consciousness
does anyone have not have an internal consciousness
then why did i hear this idea that a majority of people don't have
an inner monologue
they don't have any thought
i think for changs pit made that up because they were so blackpilled by how fuck and stupid people are
i'm pretty sure they were just but herd a how fucking stupid people were so they're like
they just made that up
it's actually true though think about it it's actually true like
most people are going to look at this and they're going to be like
yah the namscay yeah
you thinky
six
they don't care they don't they literally don't give a fuck
the
i know this firsthand
all right every time i
whenever i make any
post on twitter
whenever i make a post on twitter people are likeh sure
and they share that photo yeah two holes
must go maint
people are literally just stupid they're literally just fucking stupid
yaleski yeah
he's a tough guy
w
that
that's literally the majority of people they don't even think
they don't care
they're not going to notice that this is
if this is sauce looking they don't give a fuck
they don't think
maybe it's just boomers
i don't know
but whoever the mass target for this is does not care
they're like
yeah
got a tough nie
most people are just dumb as fuck
ok
just like the walking is really weird this is what really weirded me out like
yeah that's weird
sorry but
that's just a little too convenient
you know that's just a little too convenient
when he walks up like this
u
the lank you to the beggar
this shadow ok let's say it's a green screen
i'm pretty sure if you just have a light
here
you would have a shadow on the greenscreen i think that's what we're looking at
but
the shadow does kind of interact
with this shadow so i really don't know but it doesn't matter because most people won't fuck and care anyway
they flicker and there's zero depse in the background
yeat the weird thing is is that if this is green screen
this would not be a vidio this is literally just a picture
actually does
if you look the lights do kind of flicker like they do kind of change a little bit in the background
i don't know if you can see on your end
but they are kind of yeah if you look at here they are kind of flickering in't know
well we know where our taxpayer money is going
it
we know where our taxpayer is going
taxpayer money's going
and
to be honest
this is a rip he's getting ripped off he should go to congress and he's going to he should be like
i am not gidting
i'm not gitting
even hollywood this is what this is hollywood
i nean the hollywood
anet transformers michael bale
you are giving me bodywood
everyone keeps talking
about a no fly zone when what we really need to start talking about
is
um
a no
we need to start talking about a different kind of thzone
which in hollywood they called a blue screen
missing
only fuk
mmhmm
noble mooma thank you so much
i heard that
i really heard that
i actually heard that in a second
m
that's literally my best alert
that's the best sob blert i've ever had
also because it scares the shit uto everyone
that's the sublert that scares this shit out of the child thank you moll missionank you appreciate you
sas
they oposed the jackson speech really
see
lies holding firm refusing to back down
the great jackson hanke ladies and gentlemen
w'll stop everybody it's good to see you all big rad a plaa kb a moppin and the center for political innovation for putting this on
it's good to see so many normal people in here you know it's allday some
white pretty much father was a so guys i'm you can't actually see me because i'm very much
to the left right here i'm like out of frame it's an interesting place to grow up
my father
and you know what they're using that money at the capitol police to do now
they're using
st in united peru
iice
that's super cool
ah you can see logo in the intro video
hello everybody can you see me in the opening
i see
yeare you can
re you can guys guys heremy here i am
i'm right here
see me
right here
i'm right here
and that's samira
this is me and this is samira right here
my name is adn wester and i would like to welcome everyone to the suort conference of the center for political innovation
i saw you
dm i did not there's a lot of you in the chat to watch me
did not
approach me
i don't the only people who approached me was tallen
void burn
and one other one other guy i think one or two other guy you were scared
that's my biggest regret
honestly
you know how much that makes me feel like shit
come on guys
if anyone was scared to
come say hi
that makes me feel like shit that makes me feel like
wanting to go to bed feeling like shit
ok
and honestly guys i wanted to just chill with you guys in the middle but i was stcreaming instead
just because i had to stream like i didn't stream the day before whatever
but guys ok let me just be clear guys iw wasys joke about this
if you guys see me in person
you can show with me you can hang with me okay
like
i'm not going to fuck and be an asshol like you know this is our community it's my community you know
i joke like when i say that shit weere like if you see me in person don't go near me i don't want to talk to you like
it's mostly a joke ok
it's mostly to keep the weirdoes away right but like
you know
this is one of the only events where you guys get to see me in person you know
so don't be a stranger
but m
yeah i was really glad to meet everyone i met
i met twin i met voidburn
i wish i could have chilled more with everyone i met pesto i just wish i could have chilled more with you guys
instead of swimming
you know
but im
what did you think of the fentes destinyes w we're going to watch it
we're actually going to watch that
oh fuck you can see my ball spot look at this
am
that's vicious
there it is you can see my that this is how you know it's me
can see the ball swat it's a beacon
go to turkey i am going to go to turky
and he s i'm a narciist i only care about
it one of fck they turn back
y
i think this is me
no it's not
enforce idleness
and pledge our words and skill international
i'm not going to use an oxen i'm just going to go to turkey and get a transplant
right here
no are we no weh're in front right here oh f missed us
is that would of good
you can see me
just take the first sack
this first sec you could see me
one
there i am
i was so fuck and tired
but there i am
let's do like very slow mo
ah
there i am
right there
my posture's really bad here
madn my posture's horrible
pt the fog
i didn't get any sleep then
this does not look good
this is me
right here
this is like footage of me
its caught
why was my posture bad
h is dint ge any sleep
i di don't get any sleep
here i am
it looks really bad i'm not gonna lie
this looks really weird i look fat here
i am a narcisist i'm sorry
gotta wait until my
speech
i
yea that's me
and then i'm sure they're going to release my speech
in a few days
and we'll actually watch that ontream if you guys want you guys want to watch my speech on stream
when it's released
yeah we'll watch it onstream when it's released
when it's released
when it's released
yeah anyway
this is that l
zelenski
ok putin
appeers to a moscow stadium
and praises troops in ukraine andt check this out
raises the troops in ukraine
proud chance russia russia
they don't they only show you the protest of like a hundred people in moscow they don't ever show this to you
right
si pisana christians the the saying all of these supporters were paid
if all of these supporters were paid one dollar how much would that be
'd be a lot of fuck and money gy no they're all paid five dollars
two chairs two
a beautiful photo in fact checking let me chack it down
this is like batman
is this real
ten
that's real
that's real
that's a sign
yeah
story that er say it sis yes se if n p sty ve se if ca serious even the national here theational w you p youars be them you to dok w you have these two industral together for you to bece believe sure
what you do i d noting do' no brath bk wait del about noby good do go you need
is there rereditor account that said holy shit
my commanding officer came to my barracks to bring me an m r e and i literally screamed at her and hit the plate of rations out of her hand
she started yelling and swearing at me in ukrainian
which i didn't understand and i slammed the door on her
i'm so distressed right now i don't know what to do
i didn't mean to do that to my superior officer but i'm literally in shock from the cruise missile strike
feel like i'm going to explode
why the focking fock is a lenski losing
this can't be happening
i'm having a mental breakdown i don't want to believe the world is so corrupt that nato won't impose an ol fly zone
i want a future to believe in i want zelenski to be president of a united ukraine
and fix this broken country
i cannot fucking deal with this right now it wasn't supposed to be like this i thought we had an anti air coverage in western ukraine this is so
ntial gans so po sireus nugenia so polis you ginia and know who is nia but the uses you way nigeria paches the pople fy uss use what you be station what you do and yourly playground he
doctors gzll so girls you i don't us love i see that that thats you what you see that
the dsa is self destructing what's going on with this
o oh drama
the dsa n p c just released a statement discharting the b d s working group and suspending all b d s steering committee members
from holding positions in national leadership
one year after
had the audacity to stand with the palestinians
lexies bicps infra eight ready lexies bicps to
mm
mm
if nick land say anything no don't don't bother him
if you want to come on you can come on
don't bother him though you know like don't be annoying
don't be annoying
ya
finally i wanted
this final piece of news before we watch the destiny versus nick fuents debate
india has just bought oil from russia at a discount and in rupe's roubles this is a story you hear on hear on the news global
india does not give a far
about
he sanctions they don't give his shit
they don't fuck and care
they don't
give a flock
they literally don't care
all right we're going to watch the flintas
the debate
those who dance
keep saying the
all right we have to watch it on destiny's channel
uh but
you know
we're debating about the justification of russia change the title to
s invasion of ukraine the february invasion of ukraine cannot be justified by any means that are not overt russian propaganda or statements that entirely dismiss the sovereignty and right to self determination the ukrainian people
this invasion into ukraine must be opposed by any means necessary short of direct military conflict by anyone in the west who values any of the basic tenets of liberalism
or the rights of any nation to determine their own path forward in the world
tonight nick might try and convince you that nato promised it would not expand one inch further to the east ignoring that these comments were originally made by secretary of state james baker in nineteen ninety with regards to nato expanding its military presence into eastern germany
no it wasn't
because
you read the actual statements
it said if we guarantee
a nato presence in a reunified germany
we won't expand one inch east
gorbachev made it clear
that certainly we would not
expt
or find acceptable in expansion of nato's
zone
to the east of germany
which remains demilitarized to this day
interview with russia beyond the headlines gorbachev himself the soviet leader in one thousand nine hundred during these negotiations responded to a question asking why nato promises hadn't been legally encoded with gorbachev responding and i quote
the topic of nato expansion was not discussed from the what the twenty fourteen interview
yeah
gorbachev was talking about what they had been discussing at that time
but baker made it very clear that one inch east was one inch east it was only germany
best at all and it wasn't brought up in those years another issue we brought it wasn't brought up in those years
because nato never had the gall or the audacity to even suggest
to russia
that they were going to expand their sphere of influence
let's say we just granted destiny his argument and we granted this fairy tale idea
that
oh what they actually meant was they weren't going to expand it to the east
in germany
what do you think the implications of expanding even more east
would be then
you know that was just assumed that that's way off the table poland and the baltics and
you know hungary i mean that's just way of
if if they're supposedly negotiating about germany
you think that it's even like it would have even been conceivable for nato at the time
to entertain to gorbachev an expansion of nato to the east
of its eastern europe and folkna
up was discussed making sure that nato's military structures would not advance and that additional armed forces would not be deployed on the territory of the then
after german reunification
baker statement was made in that context
everything that could have been and needed to be done to solidify the political obligation was done and fulfilled quote
nick may try to say that some verbal assurances were made between leaders
but why would anyone ever expect the geopolitical landscape of an entire continent be dictated by verbal agreements made in one thousand nine hundred ninety between only two nations one that no longer even exists
this is even less reliable
because one inch east meant
not one inch yeast it's that simple
when you consider that the entire security situation would have radically changed with the rapid dissolution of the soviet union and along with the warsaw pact
no it wouldn't have because the russians
were thinking that the collapse of the soviet union would mean a complete and wholesale end
the hostilities
between the west and russia they said ok we're going to join the free world now that's what the whole fucking thing was about
the whole transition to democracy was about russia joining the west that's what it no one was thinking there's going to be a new
security situation
when everyone's assuming ok we're just going to have a new unified europe
what was gorbachev's vision of a
what did he call it
a europe from lisbon to something like that
perhaps nick will try to tell you that nato represents a real security threat against russia to that i have to ask a security threat preventing what exactly is it the
preventing what
i don't fuckon n
why don't you look at the the long trail of iraq
libya syria
et cetera i mean
what do you mean
along what do you mean preventing what
preventing regime change
the invasion of russia which there is absolutely zero precedent for any nato country doing is of
destiny be like
oh we didn't under we didn't have nuclear armageddon that means nato doesn't have bad intentions toward russia
oh nato didn't initiate
the end of the world and we're still
sitting on the computer
talking into mike's
oh that must mean what destiny
the fact that you're sitting down in front of a computer right now
means that nato did not
and no nato state has ever invaded russia because
that would be tantamount to starting a nuclear holocaust
the destruction of russian forces in russian territory there couldn't be a precedent for that
that doesn't mean nato doesn't have the intention
of regime change toward russia
in a way that could
bypass nuclear holocaust so fucking stupid
which there is also no precedent for any nato country doing is that the annihilation of russian forces in russian allied territory by nato countries whichs only happened when russia has lied about its deployed paramilitary forces as they did in two thousand and eighteen in syria during the battle of kasham
perhaps if i may suggest instead what nato represents is a threat to russia's ability to undermine and interfere with the politics of its neighboring countries
imagine a situation
situation where russia recognizes two independent self proclaimed republics that no one else in the world recognizes they thena
g that's not true
i don't know if he's being hyperbolic but
there are countries around the world that recognize the donyatsk and lugonks people's republics
and in their military to secure peace not only in the contested region but to march far beyond that the rest of the country simply out of fear the election the democratic leader who favors dealing with the west more than russia
not even talking about the modern day conflict in ukraine but instead this is the story of the two thousand and eight was so georgian war where instead of the self proclaimed republics of luhonskin donessk it was the self proclaimed republics of south osetia and and
yeah but that was a dispute that was never settled even after the collapse of the soviet union
the conflict in georgia began immediately in the nineties
that never ended
aazya and abbazia sorry
instead of securing the important geographical funnel of ukraine it was establishing loyalist states in the south caucasus region
how many of these strategically vital war no it wasn't about establishing loyaliestates you dumb fuck
there was a civil war in georgia
the south ossetian separatists were not created by russia
because that was in the immediate aftermath of the end of the soviet union the same thing happened in transnistria
there was no like russian deep state the the soviet didn't collapse
everything was like in chaos
you had these russian speakers
living in georgia
living in moldova now transnistria
who were not accepting the new status quo and russia
because of the overwhelming consensus of the russian people
supported them
this is a complete fucking
rewriting of history
or is are we forced to allow russia to engage in
i wonder if nick will bring up broken promises and agreements with the soviet union and russia that were actually put to paper could be the nineteen ninety paris charter signed by
i was it broken
the u s sr which and i quote fully recognize the freedom of states to choose their own security arrangements
one nick match
ok but then there's also the o s c e
which recognize that one state's security cannot come at the expense of another
in the nato russia founding act nineteen ninety seven pro to four months of intense negotiations between the secretary general of nato javier solana and the russian foreign minister primakov which established the p j c or russian nato permanent joint council that committed both nato and russia too and i quote build together a lasting and inclusive peace in the euro atlantic area on the principles of democracy and cooperative security i wonder if you'll mention any of the budapest
how was russia violated that
and notnatal
meorandom the budapest memorandum was violated when the u
it started sanctions against belarus in twoentousand and thirteen twenty fourteen
don't fucking talk about the budapest memorandum when the uus already violated it
three separate agreement signed in one thousand nine hundred four between the world's nuclear powers to eliminate the existence of nuclear weapons in belarus kazakhstan and ukraine an agreement i should say that required these three countries to give up the most reliable means they had securing their sovereignty in exchange for promises of and again i quote
independence and sovereignty in the existing borders
and a refrain from the threat or the use of force against belarus kazakhstan and ukraine signed by the united states the uk and russia
maybe nicholas you're omitting the part about how it also says you cannot use economic coercion which u s sanctions
did indeed use
finally the maidan coup in twenty fourteen which there is overwhelming evidence
for us
meddling and support for also violates the budapest memorandum
attack thes just all brain dead stupid fucking bullshit
idea of nato being a defensive alliance and point of time for nato has indeed active acted aggressively in the past
we're supposed to ignore that none of these aggressions happened towards russia itself of course
i'm curious which intervent interventions particularly threaten putin
does nato's intervention in one thousand nine hundred five the bosnian war threatened putin's plans for neighboring countries
this is like one of those toys where you wind it up
and you just let it talk
yea yaa the and he'
shot the fock up you were a stupid falking person shot the fock up literally shot the fock up
he's like going off thinking he's smart
saying this
hold on destiny hold your horses for a second in one thousand nine hundredine five putin wasn't the leader of russia was he
that wasyeltson
putin wasn't even in the fucking picture yet now was he
how could that be how could putin's plans be relevant whatsoever when putin was a nonexistent political force in one thousand nine hundred five
hold on a second destiny before you get fucking excited
with your dumb ass fucking onm
claims
and he was pro west back then
guys so fucking dumb
an intervention that ended the precision bombing campaign that brought about an end to the indiscriminate shelling of civilian cities and towns ethnic cleansing and systematic mass rapes being committed during sauid conflict sputin worried that his attacks today on mariopol kharkiv kirson and against countless civilians in ukraine resembled too closely the absolute destruction he wrought in twenty fifteen the city of aleppo during the syrian civil war or the twenty seven thousand civilians killed when grozi was decimate during the first jechen war in nineteenine fourin his own borders
he threatened putin do natos intervention in one thousand nine hundred five in the bosnian war threatened putin's plans for neighboring countries intervention that ended with precision bombing campaign that broughtbout an end to the indiscriminate shelling of civilian cities and towns ethnic cleansing and systematic mass rapes being committed during sauch conflict beuten worried that his attacks today on mariopol arki cerson and against countless civilians
cratee resembled too closely the absolute destruction
why would he be worried about that
assuming it's true which you have not established in any kind of way
he wrought in twenty fifteen the city of aleppo during the syrian civil war
or the twenty seven thousand civilians killed when grozi was decimated during the first chechen war in nineteen ninety fourin his own borders does natan intervent does nato intervention in kosovo stop the to stop the ethnic cleansing of albanias by yugoslavia skerputin does he see himself
self as momloshevik the first sitting had hed a state be charged with war crimes a man who was complacent with genocide occurring under his own military is he worth
am i am literally speechless about how fucking stupid this guy is
that he may want to repeat of what he did in georgia with the russian backed to recognize south thesia forces were responsible for an ethnic cleansing of georgians of almost twenty thousand of them being displaced from their homes
does the twenty eleven nato intervention in libya scare putin does he imagine him so
ok i think we're getting more we're getting warmer destiny
yeah libya we're getting kind of warmer
where
well are you going to justify that one go ahead
ought to be gaddaffi a man who imprisoned tortured and gassed his own citizens ah ok now we begin with the lies
so
yeah i'm not that educated about the balkan war so i'm not going to speak on them
i know that
horrible atrocities were committed
against the
bosnians and against albanians it about that
that's my impression right
um
but i do know more about libya
and in the case of libya
you know
yeah that's when i know i can start calling bullshit
right
the man who had the incredulity incredulity to accuse al qaeda of using l s d and nest cafes to poison the minds of his political adversaries
ah
is
does destiny think every side committed atrocities that's what i've heard as well
there's destiny on
is this thething smart
k gaddafi accused al qaeda of using lsd to to
boison his political adversaries
ok
that doesn't justify
an encroachment upon libya's sovereignty by nato
nato does not have the right to intervene in the affairs of other states
for because they have opinions about how the political process should be done
that's what sovereignty means
ok
nato does not have that fuckin right
it doesn't matter how crazy or how bad you think aadhafi is
you don't have the fuckin right to invade a country
and encroached upon its fucking sovereignty
just because you think the regime is bad
unless gaddafi poses some kind of material threat to europe
which i
which is not true gaddafi is actually the one who came to an agreement with europe
but limiting migration as well as cooperating on the issue of counter terrorism
so that al qada
does not attack euro
uh after the uh overthrow of gaddhafi we saw a
libya become a transport hub for mass migration into europe
a increasing overall social instability within europe
ah because of the clash of
cultures and stuff
increased levels of terrorism in europe because isis was infiltrating as well
a isis had a foothold in libya still has a foothold in libya to my knowledge
um
and there's also you want to start airing dirty laundry destiny as a result of nato's intervention slavery has returned to libya
for the first time
like over one hundred years it's returned
mean libya's the worst example you could use libya was once the most
prosperous country on the african continent
and it got reduced to rubble and dust
because of nado's intervention
this is the worst example you could use
of putin unreasonably fearing nato's actions thse
perfectly reasonable to fear
that nato has
the same designs on russia that it did for libya
maybe nick will repeat krevilin's talking points about the fear of nazis in ukraine
where are they where are all these nazis every time i hear someone claim about nazis the only two things they seem to bring up are the azov battalion small force numbering less than a thousand soldiers and
did destiny just say that the asof battalion only has a thousand soldiers
because i'm twenty seventeen
it had twenty five hundred
according to wikipedia by twenty twenty two
it had only nine hundred members
that's according to al jazeera apparently
but the azoll battalions
wasn't
not only a battalion anymore it spread to much others
right
yet they're they're officially part of the national guard
al zezeer claims it's estimated at nine hundred
no source given
and we can pretty we can be certain that it's even if it was nine hundred before this
war
it's much much higher now
much higher
the pon ndera me but it is no actually to be fair it's about to be zero in a few days
true
who died in one nine hundred fifty nine that remains incredibly divisive in ukraine to this day
i'll be take
yet he's divisive
because
pro russians hate him and anti russians love him
like that simple
gld off nick if nick wants to take up the position we should be canceling people based on problematic histories and their associations with far right movements i suppose we'll see what he does
far right party of svota today has only fifteen thousand members across the entirety of some forty four million people who live in ukraine they only hold a single seat in that parliament
polling data shown the ukrainian to s of thst welcoming people towards jewish people and all of eastern europe between may and august twenty one thousand ukraine was the only country in the world other than israel nex favorite country jewish people are not the only victims of contemporary neo nazism
there's also russians
first and foremost
but then there's also immigrants like africans and other minorities
to have both a jewish head of government boldmre grossman and jewish head of state vuldimre zlenski the only time ukrain's recent history when the svotter party even had any real political influence at all was when they were being propped up by unakov to be pro russian president
if russia was so concerned about fascist why would she not turn her eyes to the russian imperial movement operate so freely out of staint petersburg this is a movement that coordinates with several neo nazi movements all throughout europe even
russia does not allow nunazis to freely demonstrate on its streets
and it certainly doesn't give them any
say in the russian government
training three swedish neo nazis before sending them back to sweden where they bombed a center for asylum seekers among other attacks in europe they've been involved in nothing operates with the russian border so freely without putin's implicit approval so why does he not remove this organization from existence clearly because putin explicit why doesn't putin remove liberal organizations from existence he doesn't
it's not how russia's political system works
support putin does not have absolute control over everything that fucking happens in russia
and is supported by nazis dimitrikins the founder of russia's wagner group wagner group and he bears wafan s s tattoos on his collarbone and chest commanding officers commanding officers have been seen sporting where macds giving nazi saluteespring swastikas on desecrated houses a place of worship while conducting operations in syria the central african republic and libya on behalf the russian state
evidence that it's on behalf of the russian state
lastly maybe nick will just appeal to the illegal coup known in ukraine as the revolution of dignity staged in twenty fourteen by america in order to overthrow yanukovych there is not a shred of verifiable evidence for this the euromidon protest erupted across ukraine from late twenty thirteen to early twenty fourteen for a whole host of reasons wasn't solely du to yanakoviych who against the will of the parliament
exited a non exclusive free trade agreement the e u and entered the exclusive eurasian economic union with russia ukraine was widely considered in the
who would wait did you say yanakovich started a coup
j already nine donated ten dollars
thank you
wenty tent be one of the most corrupt countries in the world the actual ousting of yanukovych would only happen after he ordered his police to open fire on protesors killed over a hundred and spend a few days
which was debunked by jackson by the way detsey saying shit that was debunked by jackson
because the testimony of the snipers
he's out there
and almost no one repeats this lie anymore
with anukovych ultimately fleeing the country in fear of repercussions who knows maybe the shooters were secret cia agents as well russia's right to security does not supersede ukraine's right to sovereignty fresia has a problem with all its neighboring members choosing to look west for their future instead of to russia perhaps it's an issue for russia to sort through
nations should be able to dictate their own security without being threatened by a neighboring power hell bent on rebuilding a dying empire
miter
i front desk go ahead sir
all right
are you going to call it a dying empire because i'm pretty sure russia's in these stages of the birth
of a new russian great power what do you mean dying empire what's dead the soviet union's gone
there's no dying empire
well
very interesting opening statement but i think the rebuttal the counter argument is supposed to come after
my argument i didn't hear a whole lot of justification
for the nato position only just sort of these preemptive counter arguments against some of the so called kremlin arguments so called pro russian arguments
i
i didn't prewrite my statements so i'm just going off the comp here i'll say
o
yeah he's he debates just like me i don't do this fucking cuckshit
where i write down ever i don't do that fucking cockshit right
i feel like everyone who's smart
does this they just like you could if you're smart you could do it off the top of your head you don't need a fucking
rewrite anything and sound like a little bitch so in off
you know in authentically like a little cock you know
say this
you a lot of what i just heard is really wholly irrelevant
to the core argument in favor of the russian intervention or the argument that the russian
special military operation in ukraine is appropriate and reasonable and limited
in terms of its objectives
my position has little to do
with the asop ittaliion or the policing infsities discord is feeding the him in for the whole time
did you know that
let me tell you something
destiny doesn't know how to debate about anything without
the life support coming from
he scored and chat
without that
he does not survive he's li i told you he has a symbiotic relation
with the chat where he just starves he starves
b think you bring him
all right it has little to do
you did it once with a vegendude
that was the one exception and i'll tell you why it was the one exception
because
i
insisted that the debate happen in the afternoon
and he said no
so i ended up not getting any sleep at all
and knowing i wasn't getting any any sleep because he insisted that it was going to be so early
i pre wrote an opening statement the night before cause i knew i wasn't getting any sleep
and that was his fault
even with the claims that the u s had involvement in the made on revolution in twenty fourteen
it has nothing to do with the assurances made to gorbachev that
photin claims were there and others deny
has nothing to do with any of that
that has to do principally with the expansion of nato into eastern europe and specifically into ukraine
and if you go through a timeline of events it's really quite simple
a in nine hundred ninety one of course you have the dissolution of the soviet union and this is a
you know w famously describes this as a geopolitical catastrophe and what he's referring to is the fact that
overnight russia loses half of its population and parts of its territory that it control for hundreds of years
formerly under the russian empire and then
under the soviet union
yeah and additionally
russian speakers
were displaced
beyond the borders of russia
which is
probably the biggest one
right
ukraine in particular was controlled by russia for hundreds of years it was only an accident of how lenin
organized the soviet union administratively that ukraine had any kind of autonomy or any kind of nationhood at all
but
what liberals and what the nato faction likes to do is save
is this fucking cock jat
look at this chad of little bitches l
why theyre spamming the copium re mot
at a literal fact
like
this dude is literally just stating facts and there's do doing the copa mode
it's like they cope by using the copa mote it's fucking crazy
it after the dissolution of the soviet union after
the former soviet union countries
and declared independence
that there's no take these backseas that's just
set in stone these accidents
administrative accidents of world history are now locked in ethnic russians abroad and former russian lands whether they be
russian empire soviet union are forever lost now
and the so called sovereignty of nations that never really existed states that never existed must be respected
add infinitum until the end of time and there's nothing that russia can do about it
i
and i find that problematic as far as the sovereignty argument goes but let's take it a step further
you and i love about this debate
destiny had to put his own chat up on screen
cause his own chat was consoling and comforting the whole time he'd be like
well find the chattel make me look better
nato was formed explicitly to counter russian power on the european continent of course nato was formed in response to stalin's control over eastern europe
and was formed to shore up western europe against a threat of the soviet union which emerged from world war two was the second world superpower
why then did after the fall the soviet union the having of russia's population the decimation of the russian military decimation of the russian empire
did nato a defensive alliance formed explicitly as a counterbalance to russia not only not to spand with the soviet union and the warsaw pacts
remain in place
but actually then expand further
and oneusand nine hundred ne sen that's exactly what they did they announced their intention
to expand and there was of course the first trunch of natohdsiriaus
this chat
right here
would get en alive
by this guy's chat
they would get eaten alive it's like
this is like a fucking cot
this is a fucking literal cope savee space
for them
because if this guy's chat
oh my god it's fuckinglegg
expansion in one thousand nine hundred nine to poland czech republic and hungary the second trig of expansion two thousand and
which included the baltic states as well as
uh slovenia and other nations but like i'm saying that because
destiny's chat is known for being like one of the most toxic brutal chats
yeah you guys you guys will all get fucking eaten for breakfast by this guy's chat
then the third triy they would get fucking desecrated
is
there would be
mental scarring and p ts d for life
if this guy's chat
ever clash with this one
these guys would literally
i can't even say it
they
in two thousand and nine with albania
and with croatia
what's more there would be trauma one hundred percent
in two thousand and eight
no to gyet you know you know what see look
people say
that nicks communities
the be the worst to me ever
but destiny's community just attacks women
they just attack like
he's like defenseless
irrelevant
or defenseless
other type they just attack like random women right
is chat
attacks people like destiny you know
that's why destiny scared shitless of nick
it's not because he actually respects this guy
doesn't respect anyone i mean how could he right
does' he en respect himself
but he's scared really scared of his chat
declared that they would respect the aspirations
of ukraine and georgia to join nato it's at this point that russia draws a firm red line
and russia says at the outset at the bucharest conference in two thousand and eight
that ukraine and georgia would not be permitted to join nato
they said that that's unacceptable to their security posture that's unacceptable to their national interest
a and of course russia then intervenes in the georgian civil war akazi ands avo stia to that a stabilize georgia prevent them from joining
ukraine
of course then in twenty fourteen you've got the mad on revolution
a pro western leader is installed
russia intervenes in crimea and don bass again to secure their part switching of oscowll secure the if yous moscow government chp ability in the region
and then
why he kept it on twitch for this long
and got away with it
has fueled the civil war in don bass ever since for the past eight years again to prevent ukraine from joining nato it is at this point in twentousyd fourteen that we saw really the fundamental root causes of the crisis
for the twenty two years
between the fall the soviet union and the madan revolution there's no crisis in ukraine there is no war there is no invasion there are not hundreds of thousands of troops on the border the status quo which was to have ukraine a is a neutral buffer state means that there is peace
it is not until the twenty fourteen coup
when the prospect of ukraine joining nato becomes a real distinct possibility again
six years of nato ignoring russia' security concerns that the crisis begins and russia invades crimea
and begins fueling the separatistm don maass it is at this point that nato in the west begin a full scale demonization campaign of russia
and they say that russia is doing this because and we for the usual line russia is evil putin is evil he is a revanist meaning that his principal goal is destiny sat is to rebuild the soviet union or the russian empire
at any cost
and it's sort of an interesting prospect that for fourteen years the most that russia had ever done was quell is sdonesty the most brain dead take from destiny that i've ever heard he saes like
phu diin just want to rebuild the soviet union
and it's like you know why because it's such like a stupid
fok brain dead educated
just like
surf it's like it's like what a fifth grader would say oh you have this so your bfar and blut just want to bring it back
it's like the dumbest fucking thing i have ever heard
separatists
in chahnya
as well as provide material support to separatists notzi and south the seta you know that some empire building project that for fourteen years
there's no real expansion of the russian state again outside of arguably to small breakaway regions in georgia
it's in twentusyd fourteen in response
to a pro western coup in kiev that russia begins its
attack on ukraine
but where was the provocation of course the provocation was a continued
so called aspirations of ukraine to join nato and then the ouster
of democratically elected and most trusted politician in ukraine yanekoviych in the installment of a rapidly
anti russian leader
so what precipitated the crisis truly well was the western forces
since then the west engages in the demonization campaign its is all along even though they
and honestly when russian invaded crimea this hot the west off guard that
fuilling in separaateist and don bast caught the west off guard but overnight
you know whereas obama said in two thousand and twelve you know
ladies call they want their foreign policy back and hillary clinton hit the reset but with sgate labp overnight
we determined that pu was always
no good evil dictator and so on with these revenges
just clas
after his response to the mad on revolution
does the united states abandon its ambitions for ukraine to join nato of course not and these are some of the precipitating factors
for the current crisis in september of twenty twey
isn't this such like a cocki mote
what is this a mod called
it's like the moat of the nerd
sowing out
what is it
ll w yeah ll w
is like
ll w is like i just imagine is like this nerdy guy with his fucking
titdy's hanging and he's just like
and he's like soying out
you know like
he's like he's like having fun he's like
he like
it's like an adult on a swing we and that's what a fucking looks like
it looks like the most pathetic thing ofver
it looks like the bliss of nerves
i hate it so much
lullw is the ugliest mode of all time
now kk w is a fucking god to remote
keck w is way fucking better
loll dubby is just such a hideous
facial expression
it's total biscuit i don't know who that is okay i just don't know who that is
i don't care who the guy is i'm saying
the
fox
and facial expression are hideous
ok
it's just a bad emotion
moey the united states flies be pass to
guys you know what i i can't see anything anymore and so i can't see anything it's like i critique
i like i say some short like you know what i i i don't like hambur i don't like fucking um
i don't like uh big max and people be like you know the guy who made big max actually is s s the fuck upra i don't even know what to say
like
you know you can't even do anything anymore you can't i'm i hate this song i really did you know that the that the grandma of the guy who made this song passed away and i don't fuck it no
the two bombers
across the edge of the crimean peninsula and
nar don bass a very provocative action these are nuclear capable bombers
in june twenty twenty one
so i don't know who total bit who is total biscuit let me look it up
i don't know who that is
i wouldn't i'm not going to disrespect anyone who's dead ok r ip anyone who's dead
i'm just saying it's like you guys think i know shit and i don't
you guys think i know something and i don't ok
he was
of video gaming commentator and game critic on youtib ok well r i p sorry
months later the ar i peat to everyone who'se
you know
i don't know what to tell you
the united kingdom sales a british destrct can't critique lull w and the vibe i get from lull w without
going down this rabbit hole
the hms defender
into disputed black sea waters weres chased out by russia
i don't like ok fine i love the amote guys no i don't like the
ok
november tenth twenty twenty one ukraine in the united states in't have to like
every mode
ok
the charter on strategic partnership
no guy stop stop stop
he actually died then stopped
yes
and this is updated
document from two thousand and eight washington says it supports ukraine's qote aspirations to join nato
oh my god
o megalow is the amot of petals o megalow is the petal amte
omegalol is the ultimate pedal remlde
yeah
goglfan has it exactly correct
this is the ranking w is the best
then the normal imogies the best
then k w then loll
then lu w and the worst one is omegalow omegalow's the worst one i hated so fuckin much
october twenty sixth twenty twenty one ukraine
begins using turkish by rocor drones and don bass which decisively of course the mega law looks like an annoying kid
like sponge bobs going like some fucking annoying
it l yeah it's like it's the most annoying a mot
of all time and i fuck and hateed
tide of the
twenty twenty to cornokre abok war and of course they purchased
these turkish draws from turkey a nato country and this is
this is the rearmament of ukraine and then finally the the last drock coms in february nine hd twenty twenty two
when vladimir selenski at the munich security conference suggests
that ukraine may rearm itself with nuclear weapons
and so you see in twenty fourteen
installment of the pro western government the prospect that ukraine will join nto something that's unacceptable to russia which they make clear since two thousand and eight and then you see what the precipitating factors rough twenty twenty twenty twenty one and finally in twoentousyd and twenty two is there omega kick w where it's omgall but inside of it is kick w
once again a security situation that is increasingly unacceptable for the russian state
a nuclear ukraine antagonism by the british navy in the black sea by the american i don't have that one i don't have the
ya you know what
mod's replace i don't we're not having omega alall on our chat we're going to have omega k w but not both
get rid of omega wall and replace it with omega kgw
force
overcriming and don bass once again
unfaced nato expansion into ukraine and i would point out for anybody that says that russia is some revangist state or
something like this what does russia have to fear from a defensive alliance
i'll reiterate
nato was formed explicitly this was its express purpose
to counter russian power
on the european continent that they fet you know what get rid of a lol w i hate that one get rid of it
yeah get rid of lud i don't want to it just gives me bad vibes i don't even want to fuck and see it
i didn't want to see ld w
my chat
purpose of nato is to contain russia after the soviet union collapses and russia is weak and vulnerable and amputated nato expands in three major trotes thirteen countries
over the past twenty years the combined military spending of nato exceeds one trillion dollars in just twenty twenty one alone
compared to russia which is only spent sixty seven billion dollars
on its military
they say that russia' is revanjus because it expanded allegedly into crimea donbass
alkaze and soltho stya nato was expanded to thirteen additional countries
they talk about russian aggression when nato has done far more military interventions in the century
in afghanistan iraq libya
and elsewhere across africa and the middle east whereas russia had a minor engagement in the syrian civil war
u and fundamentally what it comes down to is the
ignorance of the americans and the refusal to acknowledge that america is not a benign hejimonch we are the most powerful country in the world
the purpose of the military alliance is to contain russia and russia
just like ukraine has a legitimate security interest that it is seeking to protect and so therefore the special operation in ukraine is something that is reasonable and pursuant to those valid strategic goals
the united states should listen to russia negotiate with russia
not some items that they can find common ground on and if they had done that back in january there would be no
so that concludes my oping state
i was very good
the god dessing he did that all off the top of his head
we'll do some questions back and forth and we'll
take
maybe take questions from the audience as well but as you guys know the main part of the guys questioning each other so i'll begin with you dos'ny
so before we dive in because we agree on maybe half of this and that some of this were prettygus was on i'm curious if we
if i grant almost every ud is already conceding
everything you've said let's say that i grant that russia has a legitimate security interest
in in having ukraine be a vassal state or what of their
uh they're big union let's say that i
i do grant that
why would russia's security interests there supersede ukraine's sovereignty to make decisions for themselves
what like
i just weep
were the stupid
i just weep for them
and under what how would you tell an entire country
what is ukraine's security interest
feel like listen we know you guys want to look more west we know you want trying to reclaim crimea
and increase its attacks against eastern ukraine
on of these three trade agreements but we can't do that because daddy russia is scared so you kind of have to couk yourself eternally to that country good luck
yes i've heard that argument before and it's this question of security versus sovereignty and
you know unfortunately i think the consequence of you know this nato expansion everything is that slens he was in bold and you know the question is to me
you know whether there's sovereignty or security i think is sort of an abstract question the question is you know why is russia currently in ukraine
well i guess you would say that right you know russia having some kind of control over ukraine a allur influence
over ukraine at all compromises or sovereignty in favor of russia security
i would say this is just how great powers behave this is unfortunately you knowun fortunately or unfortunately this just how
the world is
the question is how do we prevent conflict in ukraine you know why are there currently people dying why is there a war going on
and that is because nato has expanded in ebolden zelenski
um and they have not negotiated with russia now russia has had to undertake something which uh
you know they've had to demonstrate what a sphere of influence is really about which is that there's an underlying threat
of the use of force
um so you know i agree with you in some sense that
that you know ukraine must be a vassal state for russia to have it security but
this is how great powers operate this is how the entire western hemisphere is organized this is how if that's like or goanized if that's the response then why can't i just so i'm looking for some normativity from you not just descriptions and
but if we are just going to go on descriptions you can't really then attack nato for continuing to expand because i would just utter the same backterial well this is just what the united states would do of course we want to expand our sphere of influence
no because we're not just talking about expanding your sphere influence
as much as it's about defensively securing the one you already have
once and include ukraine and tonato but at that point you're not really left with
with being able to defend russia's actions any more than i would defendos actions including ukraine
well here's what i would say the difference is is that
for
for russia ukraine is a vital security interest
for nato ukraine is not a vital security interest and that really is where the
it is literally that simple
difference lies is that
you know you know once again when you consider that you could say that well ukraine has a right to join the nato alliance you know they may prefer it i would say there's a yeah there's a plurality of people in ukraine who want ukraine to be a nato member state but what exactly does this do for
of the united kingdom what exactly and really more fundamentally what is this
have anything how does it benefit the united states of america you know because ultimately
the nato defenseive alliance and security guarantee is built on the american military more than anything else more than you know the paltry contributions of germany france the unit in it's about the american
defense guarantee
that's the question is
you know as far as russia intervening this is a defensive act
shoring up a vital security interest nato expansion into
slovenia croatia ukraine how is this i guess i will throw it back to you
why is this a vital security interest for the nato countries and more specifically the united states which underlies also well so the first first it doesn't have to be a viutal security interest the membership into nato is contingent upon a country wanting to join and contingent upon nato membership countries wanting cot
destiny asked for a normative argument and then gives a descriptive response to a question that begs a normative conclusion
to join doesn't necessarily have to represent a security interest for everybody to allow countries into into the fold right we would argue like did the baltic states represent like
yeah but the question is normatively loaded
if it doesn't
why would they want ukraine actual security interest for the rest of europe did any of something like that these countries from these countries need to join nato to show up the security of europe other people might argue that the broader
peace enjoyed by europe might be because of the expansion of nato that it's hard to attack a country that is under this umbrella this guarantee of safety and peace other people might say if we start seeing massive excursion massive fleeings of refugees everything from ukraine they might point to that and go oh well look there's the security interest you know similar to
you know what this is like
this is like going up to some guy
slapping him across the face unprovoked
and then he punches you into next weekend
and then you wake up
and then some one comes to they ask
why did you slap him across the face and he goes
look at the way he punched me
that's why
but when we had the massive fleeing of syrians from syria and we had a refugee criss europe well now we have refugees fleeing from ukraine because of actions that russia is taking into ukraine i notice when you frame this conversation a lot i not blame you for this but it's a often framed as like an issue between russia and the united states security interest what is the russian security interest what is the united states security interest what about ukraine security interest right if we talked to any of the other eastern european nato member states like oh well you know like how are the baltics feeling right now you know how are poland how how are you guys feeling right i n
how are the baltics feeling right now
i don't know it depends
are they doing another one of their s s march rallies that they fuck and do
the commemorate the nazis during world war two
how have the baltics felt how do they treat the russian minorities
in their own countries how does latvia
treat the russian minority in its own country
how does estonia
treat the russian minority in its own country
lithuania is the least
bad to the russian minority
because lithuania actually has a history of being a state
lat to be estonia don't
they're probably feel pretty good they're probablyeel a lot more secure you would ask ukraine imagine they would probably feelretty secure as well they probably wouldn't have to worry about their ports being taken over by russians breakaway states being recognized as independent and
i can't fok and believe how disgusting these people are
i can't believe how funked and disgusting they are
the baltic countries already joined nato
they already joined nato
russia' is doing this because of the culmination
of nato's eastward expansion right on to its border
and ukraine is the last straw
and now destiny saying well i'm sure that it's what i just told you you go up to a guy you spit in his fuck and face you keep spitting in his face
five hundred times
and then
finally you spit in his face one last time this time loaded with mucus
and he gets so fuckin mad
that he just does a donkey kong from super smash brother's maylades pah fucking sclaps your fucking face
and you have like a
you have like a a two d face because the got clapped
and then you turn and someone asked you
why did you spit in his face i'm sure you don't regret spitting in his face ha do you look what he did to your face
what he just fucking sad
russia has never exhibited any
any like annexation or taking over ports or anything that you're talking about except in defence of toenato's expansion
which started first
and that's a fucking fact
i think it's worth addressing so so answerr question like in one the security interest isn't necessarily relevant that's a requirement to join nato but too if we are going to talk about security interest that it is relevant
because you started this argument
by asking why does russia security supersede ukraine's
be able to talk about the ukrainian security interests which is keeping their country free of russia i know about the vulgar red gap i' one who brought it up
well and i think that's actually i mean to ask the question is to answer it what is ukraines security interest you know ukraine's not very secure right now
right i mean russia is invading ukraine russia is currently bombing ukraine involved in a full scale invasion of ukraine
and so
you know what was alenski daring russia to intervene you know when lens he goes to the munix security conference and says
and he didn't say you know because i know you're very
very technical about the details didn't say explicitly we're going to get nukes but he says look he says
ukraine disarmed because of the budahest memoranda he said
we've asked the signatories
the thre times since twenty fourteen
to shore up their promise from the buddahest memorandum which is to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of ukraine and this we're going to ask them one fourth and final time but if they don't do it then we're going to rescind all the that all the material
promises ofu the budapest memorandum which is like an implication
which is very startling and you i think you would amit a very provocative thing
but it'sres almost suggesting
and you may say it's fair but it's suggesting
nuclear rearmament on russia's border
and so you know the question about security it's like well this ukrainian policy of pro poking the bear and saying we're not giving up don bass we're not giving up crimea you know and we are considering nuclear armament and then they get invaded by russia
i mean obviously this is and the point i'm trying to make is this
the expansion of nato
it's not enhancing the security of ukraine it's not enhancing the security of the united states or russia this is a it's a reckless action and proof of the putting is in the eating because the outcome has been catastrophic for the whole world we've now
hold on
what
i'm looking at something and apparently doogan got appointed the e o
of channel one news in russia can anyone confirm
no
that whole time there was no sound
okay fur
poking the bear and saying we're not giving up don bass we're not giving up crimea you know and we are considering nuclear armament and then they get invaded by russia
i mean obviously this is and the point i'm trying to make is this
the expansion of nato
it's not enhancing the security of ukraine it's not enhancing the security of the united states or russia this is a it's a reckless action and the proof of the putting is in the eating because the outcome has been catastrophic for the whole world we've now got
you know potentially a shooting war which could break out between russia and the united states is what selensi is invited
sletsky is saying
let's have a no fly zone over ukraine you understand what that entails
and the united states won't even send their fier jets to powers compensate all right because
and so the point is this
is this expansion it's not good for it's not good for ukraine security clearly or russia's or the united states
what should have been done is that russia and the united states and ukraine could have had a constructive dialogue about surface to surface missiles
about the russian base in crimea
you know and
fats
there's just and i don't want to ramble too much ill is my last point i'll liket you respond that's the thing
russia kept asking for dialogue they kept asking
let's sit down let's just
he let's just negotiate and they don't want to fucking do it they don't take him seriously
you know
yeah for eight years they're trying to fuckhi dialogue
and they don't give a fou
only now they give a fuck when they actually do something you know
he talked about we can enhance one country's security at the expense of another well let's say for the sake of argument that nato expansion
enhances the security of ukraine because you're right i mean would this prevent russia from intervening if it was a done deal probably yes
but what does this entail this entails that nato now has a right
to put military bases surface to surface missiles potentially a b m platforms and other things in ukraine it means that there's a nato naval base in crimea if that that becomes part of ukraine again
this is a detriment to russian security so by bringing nato forces and again and what is the purpose of nato the purpose of nato is to contain russia so you've got nato now again its purpose is to contain russia and ukraine right on their border and you know how strategically important the black sea is
you brought those bases to russia's doorstep
is this a detriment to russia's security interest yes so if you talk about you know what hancing one security one nation security at expense of another that's what nato enlargement dots the status quo
p
he's not crazy
we see the injustice
at every level of life
you want to know the only evidence you need
of the arrogance of how the west behaves in the world
and how they don't believe in any fairness or equality or anything like that
look at within our countries
look at every institution how they act
every single mainstream media every establishment every institution
they always act in a way
where power goes before truth
they say oh we don't need to be just we have power
that's with everything
everything
look at hot any any fucking company you work for anything you do
barness doesn't fuck and matter the only thing that fucking matters is what
you know
the law of the jungle yet
it's not just the west of you're right
but
the only difference is that the west pretends to be this
democracy that believes in the rule of law and justice and fairness and equality or ever nobody else to pretends to be that you know
that's the difference
ensure the security of all the countries the west uses the authority of democracy
uses the authority of the
liberal freedoms and shit
to be able to boss around others
they say oh we're not see look if this world was the law of the jungle china and russia would eat the it would eat europe for breakfast
europe gets its power because they go oh we're defending
democracy we're defending human rights we're defending equality if all that shit was gone there would be no chance it would be eaten alive
india's got over a billion people
it's more than all of europe combined
's involved in you know and i gea but like the record of history clear on
i don't like that it's equivalently talked about that like well let ukraine security interest is to not be fucked with and russia's security interest is to continue to fuck with so i'm going to be a little bit more laniing on the side of ukra
russia's security interest is to continue to fogk with
again
it's the anoalogy i gave you
you slap someone in the face
then
they fucking body slam you into next week
and then you ask why did you slap him in the face look how we body slamed me
the same shit
crane that not doesn't want to be invaded it doesn't want its territorial integrity constantly threatened the doesn't want which i am glad at least you acknowledge that like all of those eastern separatists who did it
it's like it's like the terminator you did it because in the future it happened
you did it
to retaliate against the consequences of your actions
what
groups are fully funded and backed by russian militaries right
lithuania doesn't have these problems stonia doesn't have right you don't have these problems in countries that have joined nato and when you
why would you have those problems in the first place let's say there was no nato
is there any evidence russia would have invaded the baltics
in any capacity if there was no nato
it when you're ukrainian and you look to the north and you look to the west and you look and you see these countries are in nato don't have to worry about russia coming over to threaten your territorial integrity
i'
you're territory
when you put all this in the context of the twenty and fourteen anti russian coup
ukraine's hostility toward russia
and russians within ukraine
russia's security interest becomes very fuck and clear
i don't understand how we can say that there isn't a vital security interest there for ukraine unless you're literally saying well there's not because look russia made it not right i don't know that's necessarily a fair thing to say that they don't have a security interest because now russia is afraid of them
dealing with their security interests
um
we talk about like the
it's so iron this is another thing that's altterrunnic to is we talk about like well nato is an organization without purpose it was created to only contain the soviet union the wors off pact in ninety one should have been disbanded you know people say that other people yeah it should have
because
russia did never show russia wanted to join the west after the soviet union fell
they even wanted to join nato the west spit in their face
why
there was no threat
say well maybe the expansion of nato can ensure greater periods of peace and prosperity for europe which arguably it has but now today now you have countries you
like sweden and in finland talking about potentially joining nato just because of how aggressive russia's been acting so while you might say on one hand like well look it's not a
if sweden and finland join nato
russia is going to create military pacts with cuba and venezuela
good luck america
you know they're not going to invade finland or sweden
but they're just going to
they're going to give you a taste of your own medicine
and see if the u s will tolerate
the security interest of ukraine because now russias attacking them i could say on the other hand dukes in venezuela and cuba
and well look this isn't in the interest of russia because now everybody else wants to join nato it feels like and even if you are pro russian you have to acknowledge that today the nato alliance is probably stronger than it ever has been there has been like a revitalization across even even nato skeptic countries like france even germany that was unwilling to go as far as some of the sanctions and military equipment even by the way
let's say mexico amlo decides to put
ah
russian bases in mexico is uus going its allt russian bases in mexico
and that initially wanted to contribute as much these countries have been revitalized in purpose united against russia to where if russia doesn't succeed in if they do succeed in ukraine it feels like now all they've done is create a stronger nato i feel like something that the united states has done a decent job of say for iraq at least in the past thirty years feels like exerting soft power
well safe for a rack
though like the most important example of u s fucket foreign intervention
that's it was going to put that on the side
let's put that one on the side
i wasll just put that one on the side
the main fucking highlight of america's
foreign policy career
lets put on a side
butle forget about them
that's like saying
that's like saying
you know
epstein did not
listen guys
that's like
it's like saying fucking a
it's so fucking stupid
a's exact charles manson is a very kind good man
i mean save for the time like he butchered a bunch of people and like massacred people and whatever and
stabbed people or
forget about that i mean
all in all he's a great guy right
but that's what he's known for
you just brush that out to the side
instead of this hard power this idea you need to invade and take over everything maybe it would have been a better route to go for russia rather than i'm going to seveastobl i'm going to crimea i'm stealing your base i'm finding these separatists i'm going to invade the fuck abot a million people dead isn't enough for it to be significance right
true if you don't do exactly what i say i feel the error for that politics is passed and all russia has done with her current actions is undermine the security of all of europe revitalize nato andorry two million yeah
let's put that to the side
ukraine's sovereignty for no real justification of its own other than they want control of that piece of land
well
and you even conceded though it's you know there is a vital security interest in ukraine it's it's not just because they're greedy and everything and i would flip it on its head and say we talk about the security of ukraine we're not talking about a bilateral security guarantee
we're talking about nato
which is an empire
in a sense that
you know the nato states are beholden to the united states i mean we know this that
georgia and ukraine
you know you call this guy a liar you think he cares he knows he's a liar you call him a liar he don't give a fuck
i mean
hypothetically adude
whose
in an open marriage
you going to bed at night and your wife is with
you knowan you don't
what is being a liar you're not going to care what do you care
you know
you don't care if you're known as a liar if you're a fucking liar what is truth
who cares
their aspirations to you don't care you don't truth don't matter if you don't got any fucking honor or shame
nanea we recognized the first place
over the objections of france and germany
in two thousand and eight we know that the united states run nato we know that the united states is always run nato so when we talk about ukraine it's fine and well to say oh well ukraine might be concerned or something
but we are talking that you know you sort of lose your
lose your ability to talk about oh well am i right my self determination when you're talking about inviting
another empire and becoming an outpost of another empire
next to russia and putting nato bases and listening to nato decisions and nato military and becoming a vassal state you know what i think i'm like i better not i' would hate to be caught in a lie in this because i'd be really embarrassed and it'd be shameful
and it'd almost be like being a cock like that's like my girl getting fucked by another dude that would be like
shame for you know
but if you don't care about that
wow that's scary you could do a lot of things
with a good conscience
of nato in a certain sense becoming and with the european union too with the currency and economic union
are we going to pretend that there's no pressure exerted on ukraine from brussels and the e u there's no pressure exerted on ukraine in nato from washington d c as a result of their being joined up with these suprnational unions of course there is and i also want to frame the conversation this way you everybody talks about big bad russia and russias this revanchist and russian aggression and so on but let's let's flit the script and let's put ourselves in russia's shoes
the combined military budget of nato you've got more than eight hundred billion dollars
in military spending for the united states eight hundred billion and three hundred fifty billion for the rest of the nato countries
you have one point one one point two trillion dollars in military spending from nato which is now expanding and again
in you can say nato doesn't have a purpose
i think that's a little disingenuous the purpose of nato is to contain the soviet union the purpose of nato is to contain russia they're not expanding into africa they're not expanding into
latin america they're expanding in eastern europe they're expanding ino former warsap paxs countries former buffer states former soviet satellites
so you
if you took away this guy's chat
it just like looking at his facial expression
take away his chat like this chat right here he would just go
he we was just fucking
it would deflate like a balloon
he would deflate like a balloon
he would like to lose the source of his life for good
you've got one point two trillion dollars in spending on nato you've got
thirteen countries are taken over in the span of twenty years
and you're russia and russia spends sixty seven billion which is of less than a tenth of what nato is spending in the same thing happened to you
now i started fucking twitch one year ago
see the way i carried myself before i started twitch i've always been this way i've always walked with my fucking nuts hanging mother fucker
if i had a passive
attitudes to my fucking community
i wouldn't even be getting in the trouble i've gone
one ha these optical blunders
do i mean i've always been a warrior
i've always been a warrier i've always been a soldering of a fuck
and the west paints russia as the aggressor nato is coming
to their doorstep they've got the baltics they've got all these countries russia says a red line is ukraine and they say that's not good enough we're taking ukraine to
and of course understand what that entails is
and you want to i haveven't heard you acknowledge this
what about russia's legitimate security concerns about not ukraine safety but nato missiles in ukraine and you can say that's defensive but everybody knows there's no such thing as a so called defensive capability
the platforms that are used for an a b m
can be used for an i c b f the missiles we're talking about theter support missiles which are conventional they could be easily
equipp with nuclear warheads they're talking about a
alliance which expressed purpose is to contain russia deploying a b m surface to surface missiles to forward depllyying a base in ukraine in the black sea
in order to project power explicitly against moscow and against
a against the caucus region and through the black sea
and nato is vastly more powerful than russia so the idea yeah i'd actually i want to i want him to end with this
what did russia do to threaten ukraine before the twenty fourteen coup go ahead
and then this undermines the whole idea you know if russia is this revnch a state
nobody in the right mind on the west or the east thinks that russia is even going to be able to occupy ukraine let alone rebuild their empire you know you talk about all of central asia the baltic states the warsaw pack countries
forget about it they won't even be able to ge to occupy all of ukraine
in the foreseeable future they're having difficulty even winning ukraine in a short amount of time
so the idea that
you know russia poses this threat oh they're going to roll into poland or something that the aggression must be contained it's laughable
sixty seven billion against one point two trillion and everybody's pointing the vigor and saying we all russia must be contained at any cost
o i think it just
it says that america's rule is innocuous
and benign and that's not the case it says that nato is expansion is innocuous and not threatening that's clearly not the case and the numbers
the numbers itself speak to this we saw i mean we can talk about the numbers but i mean like you can keep saying one trillion to sixty billion all you want how many times has nato invaded russia how many times has nato a threatened aggression towards russia
like it hasn't happened
first of all
again with this stupid shit how many times has nato invaded russia obviously zero
because that's immediately nuclear holocaust so that was the're going to directly invade russia
but how many times has nato threatened russia
i don't know is deploying missiles
in eastern european countries not considered a threat is expanding to the baltics
not considered a fucking threat are sanctions not a fucking threat
is the saber rattling during the syria conflict not a fucking threat i don't know
you tell me
how many times has nato threatened russia
probably throughout the entire fucking duration of its existence
given that it was literally created to threaten russia
and you know we can talk about security interests you know it's funny you mentioned
you're so wrong wow
and you have gnako maastia go ahead make your fucking argument
how am i wrong
go ahead type out how i'm wrong
your sound wrong while natoes never threaten russia
ano just exists to contain the
a timbuck too
nato exist to contain nato exist to threaten the
australia okay nato doesn't exist to threaten russia that's just for australia
every they're going east because australia' is to the east
right that's why theyre that's why they always expand east
what a dumbass
transnistria south ossia
weere all threats to ukrainian sovereignty and by extension all former warsaw pact
countries
those are all places with russian majority people
who were themselves engaging in separatist wars
with their respective countries
no you get on discordy little bitch you get in my fucking v c
are all threats to ukrainian sovereignty
crystol how how was transnistria a threat to ukrainian sovereignty how is south o st a threat to ukrainian
sovereignty howers
abkhazia fucking threat to ukrainian sovereignty shut the fuck up
no it's not
those were not threats to ukrainian sovereignty
what are you even talking about
how was that a threat to focking ukrainian sovereignty
in what meaningful sense was that a threat to ukrainian sovereignty
buck and moldova in georgia how
by the way a lot of people have this idea that like
the fall of the soviet union was like this neat thing
where everything was just
rainbows and butterflies no there was a lot of disputed shit and there was a lot of wars and civil wars and
internal conflicts that persisted
the south osetian conflict being one of them
same with transnistria
this was all shit that was never actually settled after the end of the soviet union
just not it didn't collapse in this neat process and the a bm missile platforms and everything a b a missile platform cannot fire an i c p m the
what
yes it's fucking can
what do you mean it can
look at yeah look
thank
this face says it all
this face really says it all
yeah military expert destiny
the the antibolistic missile platforms that we installed in poland you can look at me all you want but biden himself literally invited russian inspector
mm
to come in and inspect these things just because it's a tube in the ground doesn't mean you can just as easily throw a diffent type of missile and i c b m in there there's a whole different apparatus there's a whole different hardware requirement for firing these missiles the whole sok requirement for firing these missiles tubes in the ground are not just things you can stick whatever missile you want and happen to fire nuclear warheads out of just doesn't work that way and again biden and invitation of russia to inspect these platforms i think proves just as much as that when we talk about how there's pred right
your olt
think is down thats may
destin fuck my wife fuck my girlfriend destiny i wann to be like you
pressure from washington or pressure from the west on what could be ukraine's economy about threning their sovereignty just the comparison is just totally unfair if ukraine chooses to be pressured by joining those types of number one
b trade agreements by joining those types of n alliances i feel like that mounts the pressure on to you then to answer if there is so much pressure from washington militarily if there's so much pressure from brussels economically there's so much pressure from all these western institutions why is ukraine so eager to join them
clearly there must be mounting pressure in the opposite direction as well right and we're comparing on the western hand like the ability to join these free trade agreements and then on the eastern hand the forcible entry into customs unions that that would heavily restrict your trade because now you've got shared external tariffs and everything the idea that there is some like massive pressure from the west that threatens your sovereignty in a way that there isn't from the east when ukraine seems to be like
eagerly trying to join the west it doesn't make sense why like their actions and the desire of their population just doesn't seem to speak to that idea that there's so much horrible pressure from the west
something else i also disagree with and then you can answer this because all of this keeps getting fraanked nice i want get remissions for your discorse
mads can you make them a member
when you wake up mods discord mods make them a member
said initially i'll agree with all of that and then i'll ask a question aboutukraine but now i want to challenge the framing of one of these things we talk about vital security interests i don't buy it i don't agree with it i've seen you talk about the funnel i've seen other people talk about geography historically russia has been invaded a number of times through ukraine but like i have to ask you honestly if ukraine was to join nato do we really think that there are going to be troops invading russia
what a chicken shit question
was a disingenuous
chicken shit question
the better question is would there be an increased
interference in russian internal affairs
through the use of military coercion and force
and the answer is a resolute yes but if you ignore geopolitics
which destiny doesn't understand the nature of and has no fucking clue about
all you have to do is ask this very simple question
right
is crimea disputed territory yes does ukraine want to reclaim crimea yes
with the ability to reclaim crimea which would be
and invasion of russia have the backing of the might of nato yes
it's that fucking simple
putin' really think that ukraine's ascension intonato means there's going to be some sort of ground invasion or some sort of like no there's not going to be a ground invasion there's going to be a nuclear holocaust
bad a force from nato into russia
you're ap blow haart suck my fuck and cock you little bitch
who's this fucking guy
what
good evening
what do you want
i thought you were going to debate with me
yeah
i think you're wrong on pretty much all of this
yay what am i
state your business what am i wrong about
well don't you think that
there was an etho nationalist pretext for invading transnistria south assessa you know there was an e no nationalist pretext
is that even mean on
if i make the appeal
to oll of the globe
that
that they are ethnic russians
in those places
i'm making an ethno nationalist pley oh you're not
you have an unresolved
conflict
such as the one in south ossetia
between the russians living there mind you not russia but the russians actually fucking living there
and georgia
and russians
yeah stians are persians
first and foremost
but
the russians decide to go help them
yeahy're iranic they're not even ethnically russian what are you even talking about do you have
do you have evidence for the separatist being anything but
kremlin back
uh russians
rather than you know native
south assessionans or of azians that are doing this yeay in conflict at its
origins
immediately after the end of the soviet union before any kind of
remlin deepstate could have taken new form
pretty sure georgia was invaded in two thousand and eight isn't that the case
yeah but the conflict started in the one nine hundred ninety s you're again revealing your utter
the fucking situation
your go to for just calling people ignorant is a sign of weakness you didn't even know that the south osetan conflict
began in the one nineteen ninety s
uh i mean
it started in actually one thousand nine hundred eighty nine it even started in the nineties
started in nineteen eighty nine
alright
ok so
is that just
one example or what
is that is that the example you brought does that apply to transnistria and of kazia
yes it does
why because these were all non licks that were a result of the fall of the soviet union not kremlin meddling
uh
well that's demonstrably false in ukraine because your gerken f s b was working on the ground in the dawnbass
but she talked about transnistria and abkazea
i mean we're talking about all these conflicts
invading again this is this is typical lip shit
doesn't know how to funct do a sing line of argument
you don't know how i'll stick to a single line of argument so you just throw a bunch of shit at the wall hoping one thing sticks one by one what examples do you want to gay the three examples you use which was abkhazia south osetia and transnistria
started
because of the collapse of the soviet union
now you want to talk about ukraine we can talk about ukraine but you're not able to paint this broad picture ofly ethno nationalist russian aggressions and seven
georgia's conflict definitely started around two thousand and seven no it didn't it started in one thousand nine hundred eight nine russia's invasion of georgia
started around that time in two thousand and eight
ok but we're not talking about a civil conflict amongst
native south assessions yes t you are because the russian intervention was part of that conflict
by what justification can the russians invade
by what justifications can russell the question answer it by what justification can theh you're a tough guy aren't you you're going to interrupt me answer it
excuse me
by what justification can russia
invade south estsia i want to know
you just told me that they are not ethnic russians so what the justification
a
the justification specifically
is the fucking fact
that
do we have more fillers to provide me
no the justifications very fucking simple
what's the justification
i love how fucking angry you are can you chill for a second
i'm pretty chill
ok
so the south osseteans were fighting georgia at the time already
and they were allied to russia
ok
and they invited the russians in to come help them
yourrone on russia's own border
you're telling me that there was a krumlin backed coup in that oblist
no i'm not you are you're telling i mean not telling you that you're telling me that the south in sessions
invited the russians in to help them yes to war against the georgians
that's what you're telling me
and they we're playing a semantic game
with the rest of it
the south osetians invited the russians to come help them
the georgians were committing war crimes in south ossetia
and the balance of the conflict was shifting in favor of the western backed to georgian government
so ok but that sounds like a proxy war rather than an organic revolution
no it was an organic conflict because the conflict started in nineteen eighty nine
before any kremlin agenda could even crystallize
and you know the nature of
of transnistia and all these all these occupied areas today do you know that they
they can basically get no economic investment because the legal system is completely in tatters in those places because of what russia has done
what a the rsies on
russia's basically set up parallel government separate from georgia and that was still are you talking about transnistria or what what are you talking about look
georgia and moldova assert
sovereignty over the occupied areas that
russia is occupied
which
in transnistria that's for moldova in the other id that's correct
that's correct
eight
the transnistrial war started in one thous nineteen ninety
ok
alright
and the justification is
that
there were russian rebels there is that what you're telling me
yes
ok and then russia came in to help those rebels
and what's the justification for that moldova was part of the u s s
i understand that
but the uus s are dissolved
right and the russians ho still lived in transnistria
we're still russians
and that is what hitler said about the sedate land is what he said about the dance a corridor etc etc do you believe it's you know
but russia hold on the transnistrians have a right to fight for their own self determination
they did the bulk of the fighting in that war was the transnistrians themselves
but it's not like the the russians marched in and took this historical russian land
transnistrians starting in nineteen ninety
wanted to resist
the new state of affairs under the new independent country of moldova which they rejected so there was a civil conflict that was not resolved
in the aftermath of the collapse of the uus car it was not resolved
but would you agree
that
h
the
we're talking about transdcia right
yeah would you agree that moldova was unable to assert sovereignty over transnistria as a result of the aid that was provided them by russia
was russia decisive in being able to protect the interests of the people of transnistria yes
what justifies violating the so what justifies russia for helping russians in transnistria acquire self determination
again this is the same
at we ok let me ask you a question what right did moldova have to have any self determination
when the u s s r dissolved yees you think that
you think that those countries that
became autonomous areas what gives them the right to be autonomous
i mean many of them wanted it
ok well the people of transnistria wanted to be autonomous to
i understand that
i understand what you're saying
but
you have to understand that civil strife occurs in countries in the wake of the dissolution of empires the us are
was a
granted a mighty empire
ok
and when they dissolve
they were
civil conflicts in some of these areas
what areas what were those areas moldoa diviined by in georgia
what were those areas defined by who defined theor ass what defined the borders of those newly formed countries
i believe
uh
i believe that some of the states were assembled based on like ethnic groups in the ns no others no were no previous no no no no in almost every case
these were the former soviet republics
oh i mean they were the borders of the former soviet republics it's not mutually exclusive what i said
these were the former soviet republics
which didn't have to regard any of those ethnic or national realities at all
because the soviet union was one continuous state
so russians could live in
moldova
and they could live in ukraine and they could live in ge georgia they could live all over
it live in kazakhstan
because it's all part of the soviet union anyway it's one big happy family they don't have these hard distinctions a border so it doesn't matter right it wasn't really that happy a family
the legacy of the soviet ion that's not really my point my point is that it didn't matter
because
this was one continuous state anyway
contiguous not continuous
anyways
its
it really doesn't matter
what borders were formed
by who
yes it does no it really doesn't what matters is russia
did not stay independent of the civil conflicts in the wake of the dissolution of russia
no country stays independent in any fucking conflict did
did nato stay independent during the funkan yugoslav wars
i know but that's an example that you already know the answer to switzerland's been independent in many wars
what the fuck the switzerland have to do with anything you just said no country remains independent in any conflict
no conflict is it no conflict is going to be devoid of foreign interests funding and aiding
certain sides in certain parts
that much
this is true yeah
i agree with that
but you're not talking about just funding you're talking about boots on the ground in some of these places
especially ukraine
what is your point
well my point is that
this is a fucking ethno nationalist narrative oh it's not
yeah it is du if i say that there are ethnic russians being persecuted in moldova in georgia and therefore i invade
that's exactly what hitler said about the dans a corridor
to date thes not al saw n it is the war was fought and primarily waged by transnistrians themselves
whatre's the proof of that
it started before any russian involvement of boots on the grounds so that's the evidence
are you sure there was an f s b on the ground
the russian military presence dates to one thousand nine hundred nin two the conflict started in one
well was there an espionage present
what does that fookion prove
what would that prove
if there is 'an as on thek what do you mean efors b didn't exist at the time
b did and that ok with a k g was collapsing as a as an operational
i know what you're fucking asking
bro i'm asking
if the material support that russia gave was justified yes it was i told you my answer i knowion tim asals live told you the answer llion time in trouble yeah you're saying russians were in trouble and therefore russia had the right to get involved
and that was the same excuse that was given
in ukraine which is what i'd really like to talk about rather than these old conflicts
okay
ok
do you agree that in twenty fourteen that
russian separatists that were mainly wagner group invaded ukraine
no
why not
because separatists can't invade a country they're separating from that wagner group was a private military contractor we've got recovered passport beause because the main bulk of people doing the separating was not private military contractors it was the people of eastern ukraine
who overwhelmingly rejected the twenty fourteen coup which was illegal according to the ukrainian what is the evidence i hear this all the time but i've never seen any evidence that there was a western bck
who
ok here the the overthrow of yanukoviych was unconstitutional according to the ukrainian constitution and it was illegal
the necessary votes in parliament in order to depose yanukovych
were too few
to meet the constitutional requirements
i believe
verhoner
arada voted that he be deposed
thugh their parliament voted that youo they did not they did not reach the constitutional requirement for impeaching him
ok
what is the constitutional requirement that you're asserting that they did not meet
well let's look it up
yeat you need two hundred and twenty six
and
and there was allright i don't need i'm reading with three hundred thirty eight votes in favor
no no i got that wrong
you need ya you need at least
three hundred thirty eight votes
ok so
three there was
the rod of voted three twenty eight to zero so that's what you're saying
yes there is only three twenty eight
and it's a coup because
there was three hundred twenty eight
and it didn't meet
the legal
yes a legal threshold
but you understand that that's
internal right that's an internal process that's not a u
process to ot three hundred and twenty eight to zero
and then scap but it was still a coup
a
leaked call between victoria newland and i forget who else
literally discussed hand picking who they wanted to
um
who they preferred would rule ukraine
the pastor the wo and that person actually did
acquire power
that person was the opposition leader it wasn't like a hand picking he was already a known politician
why was he already a known politician
was it because it was organnic modularity among the orleans got of coach n
that was america's guy in ukraine
he was a western fuccing agent
what
what evidence do you provide for him being a western asian
name him
alexander chirchnyev
last name
uh
birch
enough
t u r c h y n o v
he was then succeeded by i believe said he
adubuzov
as alexander was the acting president and prime minister then it was the power was transferred to set he over buzav
the prime minister of ukraine among the immediate
deposition of
yanakovitch
yeah the pro the
the acting prime minister was alexander churchinoff
and then the prime minister that succeeded churchinov as acting prime minister was
said he out it was of where are you getting
that information
i mean this is the acting prime minister in twoenty and fourteen
as of went the twenty seventh of february is that was yachts on you
thiss
yachts and reuk this says as of the twenty fifth of may
after his after yanukovch's removal alexander was the acting prime minister
and president
this is wikipedia
i mean
what what
what are you ahead in lincoln in fact chaking
all right whatever
yatsanyuk was the prime minister
until
the twenty ninth
sorry yeah until the fourteenth of april twenty sixtheen
from twenty seventh of february to fourteenth of april
twenty seventh of february is that what you said
yeah
of twenty fourteen
yeah and poroshenko was president
rom
seventeent seventh of june
right
hold on where's your fact checking channel whle i'm looking for
i see it
and then
what was the idea
ok
chirchenov
yeh
she hand picked yatsunu
okay
if you didn't fucking no shee han pick the oads on you
i've heard the same phone call
yeah so it was it wasn't like a hand picking thing
but but yes it is because o
yes it was because she said we should pone call they said he should they didn't say we would
we would be happier they said we should
meaning they were going to act upon
getting him
ok
alright but
but what you're suggesting is that hand picking implies the coup
more it's not just the hand picking frida evenor in nwlan lok hall
it's also the funding
even if i agree with you it's also the funding through the national endowment of democracy and other
organs of american state department forg
funding
of
that culminated into the fucking mydon
revolution
through civil society organizations
ok are we referunded by the united states
are we are we referring to the anti corruption center or whatever
we're referring to a
a host of organizations
ok just for example
but i forgotten the name it was like a next or something
nexta
no i don't remember the fucking name
not next do it was a foking
i don't remember the name
ok well i mean
i sa it's going to be yeah ok so
i agreed that there was funding
in ukraine would you agree that there was sort of a soft political war
going on
in in uh
in ukraine
by dint of the trade deal that yanukovich
rejected
doesn't matter i he was illegally deposed
where why did the ukrainian parliament make exception when it was threed and twenty eight to zero because it was because it was a coup because they staged a shooting
ah
by snipers of protesters and that was the pretext
you completely depose him and circumvent the parliamentary procedure but even that had no legal precedent
i basically just acuse them of a crime
that those are facts not evidence
so i mean you've got to provide evidentiary support for the idea that the west staged a massacre of people
was it baar coot that shot a bunch of people
is a but
irkut it's the name of their special forces
or whatever the'ir sat there special for i don't know exactly who shot the protesters but the details of the sniper massacre
supposedly perpetrated by yanakov by yanukoviych
has been
heavily contested
i'm sorry repeat that i was looking at the fact check channel
no
ok
uh i would contest that the that the
you you need to provide evidence that the staging of of a shooting of we didn't say it was a staging of a shooting we're talking about the perpetrators
of the midan snipers
that were decisive in the deposition of yanakovich
and
didn't they say that yanukovich gave the order
no
the official investigation conducted denied there were any snipers in these midan controlled locations
majority of testimonies are by direct eyewitnesses
so these were testimonies
exacted by the ukrainian government itself
would you agree that i
if you were a head of state and you had a a
a
popular protest and then people shot protesters that were members of your police force you would have to step down
i'm not sure what the legal procedure in that for ukraine is
but no not necessarily
according to rains legal procedure
why did why did yanukovych flee the country
because he was threatened
with rearst
over a crime he
claimed he did not commit
well if he was innocent why didn't he defend himself
because he didn't think that he was going to get a fucking fair trial
i just i just you know there's this grand conspiracy narrative that you're you're
h
conjuring
involving this alleged coup it's not a fucking grand conspiracy
it's a grand conspiracy of the west both
both has to fund and perpetrate the coup and it has to both fund and perpetrate the protests
and both when you don't have the parliamentary requirement to depose yanakovich
guess what
there's going to have to be some other pretext
why were there zero nays to depose yankovich
are we there what
why were there zero nays wherere there zero nos
zero what
why were there zero nos it's three hundred and twenty eight to zero why are there it doesn't matter the constitutional requirement needed three thirty eight
and if you look at eastern ukraine
a overwhelming majority talking about in the ninety percent percentages voted for yanakoviych that was their president
who and their view was illegally deposed
and that's why they decided to declare their own sovereign republics
h
again ego gerkin was f s b was working on the ground in anieskin lugan sky list
like you if you've got radio free europe
a reporting that
that fuck and he was conducting military tribunals and firing squads shooting people for anything from
petty theft to murder
and he was doing it invoking a stolen you know law that was passed on the u s
i think that
i think that you have to at least look at that and be like well that's an inappropriate overstep for the russians
and then what were okse so the russians went to do yets and started massacring people because of a stalin law
i mean you can look it up the what's the evidence for that
yeah ok here let me pull up an article for you
it's called the executioners
of slogy on
guys post into fact checking the sniper's testimony
post it into a fact check
so this executioners
yeah of slovyance
the russian backed gunman came in hal ok these are seeing
first of all these are called russian back to gunmen they're not
actual russian soldiers
they're probably wagner group
because we've got evidence that wagner group was on the ground
indaniesky
and lugansk i was following this in two thousand and fourteen i was working as a university researcher and i was glued to the
the stories
i was on russian telegram too
so this was all wagner group and there was no popular will in dounyetsk
to separate and rejected the tent the coup that deposed
the president
that
like ninety five percent of fucking people in dounyatsk voted for
i agree with you that perhaps ninety five percent of people in then yanskin lugansk voted for yanukovych this is the pro russian side of ukraine
ok
i understand that
but ukraine has the right to sovereignty over places that
you know
even if they voted
you can't come cant we can't complain to me about ukraine's sovereignty
when sovereignty is something that's recognized principally by the people within your own country
and would you circumvent
your own constitution
the everything gets thrown up into the window
if you circumvent the constitution that actually solidifies your sovereignty
and your legitimacy in the eyes of the people living in your country
they do have the right to fucking seced and set up their own sovereign state that's based on something legitimate
ah i mean
your whole your whole notion of legitimacy legitimacy rests on this three twenty to zero vote
like it was
youn
basically it was unanimous that yanukovch be deposed
what were the margins for the twenty twenty election between
trump and biden
dude i don't even know
it was probably three hundred
joe to like two twenty or something
but what di it was really close
you're free
to make your point
what if it was really close what if it was like
to ninety versus i know it's not possible but what if it was like two ninety versus three hundred
is it ok for trump to just be president then because it's not even that much you know who cares
no but this isn't voting like that this isn't and all this they did you hold on hold on
ok it does fucking matter
i didn't say it didn't matter
so the ten shy does matter
the ten that were shy of voting to impeach him do matter
is that because of a lack of bodies in parliament
was that because of no it was literally because not enough loded to him he chained
was it because people abstained
i'm asking it like it doesn't matter what the reason for they did not ote to impeach matter
it does matter no we as per ukraine's constitution it does not
falking matter at all
your feel your feeld of free you're free to feel that way
ok
and you're free to feel that itre was an illegal coup and you're free to feel
that
you know it was a violation of the constitution
but still literally was a violation of the constitution
none of that is proof of the western involvement in the parliamentary vote
it's not proof
we're not talking about in the parliamentary vote we are talking about in the civil unrest that precipitated
the impeachment
did the civil unrest start before
a the fuckin vote
in parliament yesose yes i recall
but yes it did that was what the mamydan was
ok the md on was not popular unrest
as a result
of
you know yanukovch being deposed my don was
hot hot's a re don't say you shut the fuck up shut the fuck as you remyd donras because you shut the fuck up
my don is i hate this guy i hate this guy so much he's so fucking stupid
my don was about
e u integration yanako which wasn't doing it
so there was these protests wild protests and that's why they had the vote
right so
i mean
so yanakov itch rejected a free trade deal with europe
and instead opted for an exclusion which shes rereed to do as a president
is free to do but the but the constituents are free to
to
protest
ok they're free to protest and then burn tve to the ground
i would say no to that
i well that's what they did protest
ok it was a revolution right it was an overthrow of a government
ah
god
mm
the unrest is like
very comparable to what goes on in the united states
very comparable
like
are we are we going to say that
that you know
that
basically
ah
basically black selt black lives matter doesn't have a
a point because they
burn some shit down if black lives matter
um
was the pretext for a complete overthrow of our constitution and a coup
thatn my den
the midan revolution
not
the pretext
yes it was because yana which was deposed the shoe without meeting the constitutional requirement
ah
ok
but you you so you believe
okay
say that i concede all that
all right
but
you believe that russia has the right
to invade ukraine
as a result
no we're talking about the eastern ukraine and why they were separatists
i understand why they're separatists
but they were not separatists because of my dan there were separatists because
ah
because
yanukovch stepped down according to you
uh
and that is what prompted
organic separatist movement in those areas he was deposed in n illegal coup so they decided
you're assuming that you can't
prove that
in in the
in the event of ten more votes
that this outcome would not have been the same
you can't pretend that you know
doesn' it matter
it does matter the constitutional requirement to impeach him was not met
and yet and yet he was deposed anyway
it still doesn't give
are you a pothead are you smoking pot
now did
um
listen
what gives russia the right to invade ukraine that's
that's the big picture like you're you're russia has the right to invade ukraine
first and foremost to define its own sec to defend its own security interests
what are its security interests in ukraine
preventing nato from expanding into ukraine preventing nato's weapons from reaching into ukraine
and finally preventing a anti russian hostile ukrainian government
from threatening russia and russians in eastern ukraine
i mean that's the same thing hitler said but whatever
um
so let's see wait wait iw was that the same thing hitler said
because he said there's ethnic germans in the sedanan land so denmark i must invade there's there's there's ethnic germans or lithuania
russia never talks about invading lithuania
a that's because it's part of nato
no it's not just because it's part of nato
it's because you're going to agree to disagree no it's not
there's there's ethnic russians in fucking finland
ok
and philly is not part of natothough
i know that
it finland is not part of nato
finland has
there's ethnic russians in kazakhstans there's ethnic russians and caut in kazakhstan russia does not that's true
that's true but
dod like
you're you're pretending like there's not a pattern of behavior
with georgia and moldova and you there literally isn't
there is
there is there all they were all
once
part of ukraine part of russia's territory no they weren't russia no they were not they were part of the soviet union
ok
and you're you're fucking disputing that russia and s s are not
somehow analogous
for one another i am just saying that so i am just gating that
so they were part of the ussr
and and
hohuton has a fetish for the u s s r no one jes stor it
doesn't he does
he got up on the on the stage
in moscow and he said
ukraine's not a country
it's never been a country it's a made up country and it's a made up people
those are our people and they're the same as us
and we're going to that doesn't prove who wants to restore the soviet union but let me ask you question report the restore the soviet union he said that it was the greatest geopolitical because it was because so many people were justp how he can say it was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe
without implying he's trying to restore it it was the greatest geopolitical you can't even dispute that
russians people who were once one people
were artificially separated by these hard borders
it was a geopolitical fucking catastrophe
of course it was
i mean for russia
for everyone
i mean there were people in
eastern europe
who felt that way that's true and i don't dispute that there's been a nostalgia
in various places
for the soviet union
but i am disputing
that there's a complete willingness to surrender one's sovereignty
amongst these eastern european powers
that
you know russia's taken advantage of i think
i think you you are deliberately ignoring the fact that
georgia moldova
and and you say what it's like to talk to an n b c
now
you talking about transnistria we talked about georgia
we talked about that other place
we explained you know how it's not it's not like hitler
making this the student plan aware of the fuck you're trying to say it it'st exactly like that
it's exactly like that
have you ever been to russia
how was it exactly like that
because he said
there are russians in georgia that need our help and there's russians
speaking peoples in sid theans are not russian souths aren't potin considers anybody who speaks russian
to be russian
you don't understand we i that's the case
then he's not an ethno nationalist
it's totally ethno nationalist to assert that somebody is part of your ethnic group and then invad was not of because he's not saying border w you just admitted they're not part of the russian ethnic group they just speak russian
it do dude
have you ever looked up ethnicity it's part of it's part of your culture too
you're you're culturally russian
if you live in are white and black people the same ethnicity
no
but they speak the same language also of separate cultures
yeah and they're and they're ethnically american so southo saidians are persians mean here
are all of them persians
pretty much
no
that's not true i know that's not true
i percent n that i'm true well no one's one hundred percent
any ethnicity would by and large yes
what are the demographic profiles of south ossetia
just so soto said hea demographics
so osetians are eighty nine percent georgians are seven point four percent
russians are one point one percent
armenians are point seven percent
and that's pretty much it
thats the setion deograph he link it in in the in the
fact
check or whatever
sure
sure
so but they do speak
russian too right
i don't even know if they do
and i don't know i don't see why it would matter they're not etho nationalis it does it does because
huin has explicitly said in his speeches that anybody who speaks russian is part of russia
is part of s and actually o sin is the language they speak
that's their native language but they'll speak to just the same way that the georgians speak georgian but they also speak russia i've been to moscow dude come on
do what
what's your poy they're part of the former soviet union
everyone spoke russian as a second language
right
right
and so that applies to everyone all that applies to all former soviet territories
yeah
lucky
lucky putin
yeah but
but putin has not
invaded
he doesn't have the ability anything close to all this former he doesn't have the ability to
really
no
he couldn't persent have invaded any of those
central asian republics at any point
o he could have
per se but
there are a number of them that are on very friendly terms and supply him with military arms and military you know aid and why does like you know leaders aid from central asian republics
what aid does he need from them
are you familiar with the fact that you know
the ususr dissolved primarily because the bank was broken by the
by the space race in the arms race
like
russia could not handle the fiscal drain on their economy and they broke up
no i don't think that's why it broke up
it is
no ends on top of that
it's actually money it's actually
all right
well you tell me why
you tell me
a combination of gorbachev's disastrous economic reforms
yah coupled with
the explosion in ethnic and national tensions
i think that
i think that
when you when you talk about
disastrous economic policy you're
talking about
exactly what i'm talking about no i'm not because rbslving economic reforms literally destroyed the soviet economic system of planning
and try to replace it with like all these crazy market reforms
that shock
the soviet economy
i have no doubt that it a shocks the soviet economy
but
you're telling me that they we that the soviet union was economically untenable due to
the actions of one particular leader
that's not mutually exclusive with what i said
and your pret leader did lead to economic turmoil yeah
okay so
i mean we're greing on that
oh
m
but
like so there's no point in
say
invading kazakhistan
for example because kaz aktan is on extremely friendly terms with putin
extremely friendly terms of is that general
i mean
i mean a
rush of fels
friendly enough that they can ask for
troops
deployed in their conflicts
they're part of the
same organization the ctso what is your point
h
i'm just saying that
you ask me why putin hasn't invaded all these
of former republics and i'm just giving you a reason
because he's already friendly with many of them
he doesn't have the economic ability to do it
and he also doesn't have the military ability to do it
putin couldn't invade armenia
h
the armenians are extremely friendly to russia
you would that's not true invade meia that's not true
didn't you see the fucking armenians like walking through the streets with z flags and russian flags the other day
you didn't see it doesn't mean the armenian government is friendly to russia
i think the armenian people are very friendly to russia
and i think
i think it
ah
what you say what's your point
ah
i mean you just asked me
you just asked me
or basically why doesn't putin invade armenia and i just told you what i thought
that was my my point was there who didn't has the ability to
the armenian government's not friendly to putin
again i also said that he doesn't have the ability to
invade every single one of these countries
you think he's got the economic and military ability to invade every single one of these countries it's like it's like it's like a logical black hoole so every country he's invaded is only because he's had the ability
i mean
why would you and i mean he doesn't really have the ability to w what makes georgia so much weaker than armenia
h
i mean you told me that
there was
for one it's fucking tiny
armenias
you think armenia is the fucking size of australia or something
i think that
there would be a geopolitical problem if he invaded armenia because of the turks
i don't think the turks would like that
why didn't turks and armenians hate each other more than anyone why would the fucking turks give is ship
i mean
you think that
turkey once
russia closer
doesn't seem turky has to share the black sea with rush already what he fucking talking about
wait until you hear about georgia dude
you just asked me
you just asked me
why he doesn't invade armenia i said i don't think turkey would like that
you know where georgia is on the map
oh yeah
next arsed by jan
sure you know where georgia is on the map it's next ere b azerbaijan
what out who else is it next to
it's also
next two
a see
if
it's right on the border of russia
like
you can you can basically drive wells the least to crass adar who else
bro i don't need to name every country it's next wereabout to the east of georgia
to the east of georgia
is
azerbaijan
oh sorry to the west what about to the west
the black sea
what about the southwest border
turkey
exactly
yeah and armenia would logically come after georgia
don't you think
so putin's planning to invade armenia after what i sad
that's not what he said
but if you don't have a contiguous border with armenia why would you invade armenia
i don't know what i mean
you're telling me you're the one who said me about you're the one who said putin's only invading the countries he can invade
that's what i said he can't invade it was beakitan he can't invade m turk menistan
not remain politically tenable
why not
you can't just send young men off to die into digital information age
you can't do it then what
what's what's the standard here because
you're saying that every single conflict in which russian troops have been sent
is because putin could do it in every single one where he hasn't it is because he can't
okay sure
but you have to compare them then and explain why that is
i mean look if you take part of he tp
part of georgia
part of moldova
and you've got troops
you've got fourteen thousand troops
in armenia
you've got
troops in georgia and moldova
you've got a standing armory of nine hundred thousand people and you've got one year conscription
you don't have the manpower to invade all these places
you don't have the manpower to have them remain stationed
you don't have the manpower to you know prosecute what kinds of
what russian troops are stationed in transnistria right now
i don't know the number
you don't understand that me not knowing every single little bit of knowledge
is you don't know the bug we're talking about do you sound like a fucking idiot
i don't know
i name three examples which is south osetia transnistria and abkhazea
gay
he's also got
troop stationed in russia
youll
in russia
his own country
like we i get you the next tl
i'm trying to make it clear to you that russia doesn't have the military ability to invade all these places at once
they don't have the political ability to invade all these places at once
he has to pick and choose which ones he can invade
he's picked pretty well so far
ok so what is the rationality what is the rationale behind these decisions
h i believe
that
he wants
uh
to
create a new iron curtain for one
and for to wait the iron curtain was the warsaw pack
yeah
so he wants poland hungary czechoslovakia
eastern germany
h
and
yeah he wants all that too as well right
do you think that when i said new one i meant the old one
how would that be a fucking iron curtain what are you talking abot you know the iron curtain was
yeah it was it was basically a bunch of buff you have any actual analysis of what's going on besides just yeah i do
like you
lazily applying the fuck and cold war to twenty twenty two and saying
he just wants to bring that back
i mean if you're mad at people
for lazily bringing about
cold war policy maybe you should email putin
ok but
you don't understand the differences between the new russia and the soviet union is your fucking problem
ok
and
elaborate then
so at most made at most
at most new russia which would be probably maybe a union or an economic or political union
or some kind of new customs union or something like that
would just be russia belarus and ukraine
ok
why
because these are peoples that are historically
part of the russian people that's just historically belaruse literally means
white russian bellarucia right
ukraine used to be called malaarusia which means little russians
right and theused to call the russians the great russians
so these are all you ook to some noi gavart parski
what's that
he hoaches sonmbing gabarit parski
no
eter stuty hotches
ok so don't fuck and tell me what russian is
all right
so
i ne sh dude your accents fun yes
yeah when i was in moscow they
i can love me dod
so anyways
they love yeah i'm sure that yeah they love to me i think i think around the world people pretend to like americans especially in urban centers
i don't the actually like to do
yeah so
anyways
ukraine
ukraine is
a
filled with ukrainians
and they're an ethnic group that doesn't want to be part of russia
part diad not yet
we're the west we're looping the part we're just talking looping
look
if you're looping we're looping eastern
ukrainians identify orthrosa on telling me how ignorant i am every twenty minutes
no ok tell me about how you went to moscow again gohad
ok
yeah i so i went to moscow in twenty nineteen to see my girlfriend
it was fucking awesome ate so many fucking bleeny
i'd so many can collie
so good i stayed in qita goart
so fucky
i recommend it some time maybe you can get citizenship
so you're a sex pat
no
i met her in america
yeah you sound like a creep dude
going to be honest
i don't know i've seen the way youveug and do your show
you don't look
all that much
look at
i don't have to travel to other countries to find women
she was the most beautiful woman i had ever seen
tm
is she still your girlfriend
m
no
covert ended that
h it was coverd
i mean we couldn't travel for like to she didn't find a new boyfriend
not that she told me
how does you feel that another man is now with
the person you claim is the most beautiful woman in the world
and he's probably russian too
and he probably supports putin
another man is not with her and she doesn't ho do you know
i was probably lying to you
she probably does support putin
especially because she's now with a new man who's a fucking pro putin gigachet
i mean she doesn't support putin i talk to her like
every week three times a week
i don't know why you would think i don't know i think she's reuss trying to scam you dude
i don't think she actually likes you
now that is an interesting take
you practice reading minds often you're really good at it
can you speak up a little
no
i think she's with a pro putin stalinis gigochet
now
that'd be unlikely
if anything she'd be with a dagistani
she would be with the dagistani the most pro putin region in all of russia
you really haven't been to moscow have you
moscow is not pagistan
what are you talking about right but they moscow is like the most liberal city in russia you dumbfuck
they have so many like a liberal agastani and chechens in russia
yeah but the maority then but the majority of chechnya and gastan votes for putin
i agree with that
i'm just saying that not all of them do
what is your point
i don't know you were telling me how some guys railing my girlfriend so
why don't you just continue
he probably is dude
ah so good
just telling you the truth and he's probably a putin supporter because all the real men and
and russia supports putin
just like most real men in america support trump
it's the same in russia
sorry to break it to you dude
i don't know the polling doesn't indicate that
we started with seventy or sixty percent
support for the war
then we went to seventy percent
and now the poll the pollsters in russia have a really hard time getting people to answer the questions
he said first it started a sixty then i shot up by ten poins you didn't freakud listen to the last point
and now they're having a hard time why are they having a hard time getting people to answer the questions
people say things like
well are you going to put me in prison if i answer this
no i don't think who are these polls first of all
there's one state run pollster and there's an independent poster and in russia
all right and they're scared to answer the state run posters
question
for sure there's a i'm pretty sure there's like a consensus in russia that pretty much like almost everyone
h'zin russia is rallying behind the presidents
that's not the case my
family from russia fled russia when they invaded ukraine
why
because
who's your family from russia
i've got people in my family who are living within the third circle of the of the moscow subway system
why wh are they russians
but they are russians
why did they leave
they left because
you know that his pension was worth something
but now it's not
because of the rual collapse so they were there economic refugees
uh yeah and they don't so what is your point
i mean
look
i just told you that
you just told me that everybody supports putin i just told you my family fled russia when he invaded ukraine
how do you know doesn't mean that's because they don't want even if your family
i know that my family doesn't support putin
i know they don't
because we heard these conversations well the people still in russia mainly support putin
yes but many of them fled yeah but the ones and the ones who stayedre the ones who stayed behind mainly support him
there were there's been multiple oligarchs who said the wars terrible
there's been multiple who gives a fuck what oligarch say dude what are you trying to say
we if you don't think that a dictatorship that has to
he's the military elite in the elite alike doesn't have to fuck and no he doesn't putin literally went on t v and he said if these fucking oligarchs
ah don't get behind the patriotic effort and they want to have their caviar and be westernized that they're a fifth column and they're traitors that's what he called them
i
i saw that
yeah i think that it was pretty bad asked to me
i think it's a sign of weakness
no i think it's a sign that he has a popular mandate and he doesn't have any mandate from oligarchs whatsoever
he doesn't have a popular mandate he's on thin ice
and then why why is he able to talk
and slap these oligarchs around whenever he wants
uh
she's not really able to do that
he just did it on tv by calling them out
forr being western brainwashed elites
but he couldn't you know it's not like he's putting anybody to death it's not like he's going to war with them that's not the type of country russia is he doesn't just put people to death do it's not the middle ages
finitly
he definitely kills people with poisoning when they're rather in allegedly kills people with poison allegedly you don't even freaking believe that
yeah i do i literally
not willing to just accept
the accusations at face value are not
i thought dude i thought when those poisonings happened he'd made it very deliberate to make it as if
you know make it seem as if he was the one responsible so that peopleul could look at him and be like
will that guy
can do anything and get away with it
i think that's just speculation i don't think anyone really knows the truth
wasn't we the compounds used like
very rare and expensive to make and you know basically
that doesn't mean only putin was the what is your point ok even if he did do it what's your fucking point
i mean
you just told me that he's slapping the oligarchs around and i just want an example of the so you want you think that unless putin
poisons the oligarchs
that doesn't have a popular mandate
i'm just saying that like
when jack moss said something contrary to the script in china disappeared for months
what's your point
sounds like putince
kind of doing a shitty job
doing a shitty job with what
well taking ukraine for one but also keeping his people in line
he's got so many people leaving
and if you remember the collapse of russia in the nineties
you had an instance where people have been leaving russia and all the ex soviet states for decades what's your point
right and after the cold war the birth rate plunged by
sixty percent
so on and so forth
the people people barely
you know
they can barely freak in find
like women can barely find men to mate with because of how few men there are
that it's freaking why are you saying to mate with it's just kind of weird like
i don't know dude
you're the one who talks about
you know my ex girlfriend railing so and so
she's probably with a pro putin chad i'm sorry
i mean i appreciate your input
i'm telling you the truth
no if she wasn't why isn't she with you anymore
well
she
has to stay in russia
yeah but why isn't she like in a relationship long distance relationship with you
some people don't want to do long distances why not
because
you know long distance that because she wanted to be she's with someone else that's why i put the fucking two and two together
long dude who's going to engage in a long distance relationship at least be exclusive and me like i'm not going to you know get with a pro putin chad
that is like s at leasuses be like i'm not going to get with this pro stu putin stalinist chad with the fucking i don't even
i wouldn't even want to be in a long distance relationship with her
i ge what you're doing you're doing the open relationship thing where you're like yeah other can i real are because i want to be i think when i think that is yeah gussing and perverse
but that's what you're doing anyway
no it's not i'm not in a relationship with her
she's with you
ches wd chees are you familiar with the term
padruga
shes are you familiar
yeah but why not take it a step farther
because
i just told you there's so much distance
di you can at least keep it exclusive
why would you keep it exclusive
so she's not keeping it exclusive so she's not
why would you be exclusive
was somebody
who lives
half a world away
ok i get it so she's not
keeping it exclusive with you
mhm
chris morelock says he remembers me that's a silly thing to say
so she's not keeping it exclusive with you it's that simple
no
i
i nobody's asking for that
i don't even know why we're talking about this so she's with a pro putin chat
alright col
and you called her the most beautiful woman in the world
i mean i thought that was a nice thing to say about her
but she belongs to another man now
i don't care
doesn't bother me
i just wanted to demonstrate that
when somebody is not yours you can't be angry about the fact that they're not ye we you still you' still
calling another man's girl the most beautiful man in the world
well i know what you meant
but
i
i mean
like if you s if you met somebody w was very beautiful why wouldn't you you know why wouldn't you
you s because you you called her the most beautiful woman in the world
i'm yes
she' is literally in bed with a pro putin chad whos a giant portrait of stalin above his bed
and has fucking very hairy chest hair and he's got fucking a gold necklace and gold rings on and shit and gold if you if you knew her you would understand how unlikely that is
no i think it is very likely
you don't know her
i trust me i know this
oh yeah ok tell me
tell me what class she is from
what class of people do you think she's from
ah
where do you think she grew up
answer those questions russia
no
her soul was in russia
no
well
she lives in russia now
he does
and she can't settle for american betamil so she's got to be with russian men
yeah
which you are which you are not
no i'm not
and thank god for that i'd be dying in ukraine right now
yeah but
she is
well
what do you expect her sex life is far from dying in another man's hairy arms
yeah you're just showing how much you didn't know her
trust me
she's literally laying in bed wg with the guy who was a giant everything a guy who was a giant stalin poster a portrait in his room
with a gold chain and gold teeth
and who's very pro putin patriotic
and they're cuddling right now watching a fucking bootlegged pirated netflix
unlikely
yeah
telling you the truth
ah
so
anyways so e you or gerkin
was operating in the dawn bass
twenty fourteen
yeah
he was f s b
he was killing people
and he was depositing their bodies
where
the shells were being dropped
by ukrainian forces
what's your evidence
i gave you the evidence earlier it was a link from radio free europe
go in and look it up
okay
hold on
let's look at your radio freer aplane
the executions in ok so where do we get the part of bodies
ight just read the whole thing i'll wait
i'm not going to read the whole thing
read it read it with your chat
read it with your chat
it's way too long i just want to get to the relevant part
you said artillery
ah
shells ok ok here you do control f shell or something
ok
the thirty year old peachko a civilian was taken to a gloomy two story building surrounded by armed guards
wse interrogated forced riight a confession and summarily shot to death by a firing squad of russian backed separatists
who seizes control of the city
hes executioners so this the guy you're saying who is responsible for all of this this is not true it's russian separatists who did this f s bor gerkin strokk it says a firing spot a russia back separatist in part where igor gerkin is running the firing squad and running the military tribunal
he were blown to witz by
artillery shells okay
i don't see any evidence of blame bodies
with the artillery shops
eagor
what is his name
eager girk in
the executioners
he's a self professed former fsb officer and monarchist
so he's a self prefens professed f s b officer
but a former one
o
uh
yes sherkin lives in that place he lives in fokingdunietsk
he does now
no he's
he lives there
he does now
yeah
but i mean he was one of the same guys who was involved in transnistria
you looked that up and yeah gurgin was part of the russian groups that were within russia the russian the
patriots that went all across these hotly contested areas
of
where russians were being oppressed
were fighting for their freedom and fighting alongside them he went and they also went to the bosnian war and he went to
elsewhere and whatever so what's your fucking point
the point is if you've got russian f s b operating in the nanc it's not f s b it's former f s b he doesn't fuckt work for them anymore
bro
you know what putin said in a speech once he said once fsp always fsp
ok that's like when they say once a fuck in
one submarine and nam is always a reno it's like some fucking shit pe wile say what's your point it's not just some shit people say
it's not just some ship people say
that is
that is the nature
of service as believes that he believes it's for life he doesn't believe there's any way out
of
the f s b
there one literally is
no no
once in the f s b
you're in for life
if you if you conduct yourself that's literally not true there can lean belows me
transnistria and grosny and all these places if you're conducting yourself in a way that is benefiting the russian government this guy is an ideological warrior he's not a fucking russian agent he's an ideological warrior
that's like saying like
steve bannon is an ideological warrior
and not affiliated with trump at all
and steve bandon like clearly goes to be beanon is an ideological warrior what the fuck are you talking about
his motivations are ideological
right but do you think that putin's
ideological motivations differ from egor gerkins
probably yeah gerth in his
why wouldren't listen gerkin
listen gerkin is associated with a certain intellectual scene
ok
he's an ideologuy
he is associated with a scene
oka
ok
are you going to
are you going to talk about who's part of that scene
are you going to talk about the beliefs typical of such a scene
maybe not
what
look this is according to the new york times
his ideological rigidity precedes any connections he has to russia's security sources
stretching back at least to his days at the moscow institute for history and archives
there he obsessed over military history and joined a small but vocal group of students who advocated a return to monarchism
i still don't see how this
disavows his involvement with like
basically
operations that exclusively benefit the russian federation
and if you've got wagner group my operation benefit the russian federation as well
if you've got a wagner group
i don't know if they do
if you if you've got wagner group
in
you craine
then
you know
it seems like
for all intentsive purposes
there are there's been a
shield of plausible deniability veiled over both gerken and wagner group by dint of the fact that
waged your group is a p m c
and pm cs have some
plausible deniability but we know that wagner group has been
working in syria has been working in ukraine what are you trying to gro spit it out what are you trying to say right now grow
that it
it
you can't just send
pm cs
and and and spies into into foreign countries
and talk about it like it was an assertion of the sovereignty of the downtrodden
that's not what it was
yes it was whatever russia was sending was assistance to those people
and they sent a b uk
and the b u k fired from russian territory in september of twenty fourteen it shot down m h seventeen and killed three hundred people
so your ex your ex girlfriend is getting a b u k every night that you're not there
and then igor gerkin
igle gerkin
posted on contact you
that
they shot down that plane
even even if i accept everything you're saying it's not relevant or meaningful at all
it is relevant no it's not you you have all these a holier than thou claims about sovereignty
oh you know these people in this whole list need to have sovereignty and these people in that a listen sovereignty is very important but when it comes to the collapse of the u s s r that was an extremely messy process which to this day has not been resolved
it just feels like so in that that's that's a situation where like the middle east
and the balkans you have an issue of the development
of sovereignty which is still an ongoing development
ok so you're saying that
the process like
since the collapse of
the so sovereignty a sovereign sovereignty is based
on customs traditions mors and history and things like that it's not just based in a formal institution
sovereignty is also based
in the custom and tradition and legitimacy of a state
all those things are still contested after the collapse of the soviet union
you so you're basically saying that
the states that
that
sort of
split from the uus this r when it dissolved
i're still struggling to figure out
what their sovereignty actually is and what it entails
i
i feel like you
believe
that
the collapse of the u s s r was
terribly unjust
and that
alright
whatever
whatever rationale need be employed should be employed in order to justify
invading
sovereign territory
and you're saying that
you're basically saying that
the sovereignty of these places
it was essentially up for grabs
if it's not set in stone
and
it it feels like that is not what i said for example if russia were to go in
and occupy moldova at the expense of the moldovan people's will
that would be an act of oppression in whatever
funk you talk aout right
that's not what we're dealing with here
situation just way more complicated than that right
let's de let's deal with specifics then
all right so let's say that i conceded that
to nanskin lugansk
needed to be invaded by putin or whatever
you they were not invaded by putin
okay
right okay
so
let's say that
that's the case and
and all that
what
and you just told me that if
russia invaded moldova at the expense of the moldovans
that that would be wrong
and know i'm saying if russia invaded moldova
like the whole of moldova and
forced russian sovereignty over the will of the moldovan people
that the moldovan people have to live under russia and russian rule yeah that would be wrong that would neglect
the reality of moldovan sovereignty
right
and self terminations
what is the
what happened with ukraine
such that
he can
override the sovereignty of the native ukrainians
i don't understand
how it's different
from the moldova do simple days ok
a
russia is not occupying ukraine
it is
demilitarizing ukraine in eliminating a security threat coming from ukraine
ukraine does not have the sovereign right
to pose a security threat to russia
if you want to guarantee a lasting peace on the european continent
if you don't care about peace on the european continent you want to be world war one all over again
then there's no basis for any fucking sovereignty in the first place you chastised me for employing cold war politics earlier and now you're that's not cold war politics that is literally all real politics forever
before the bill clinton era of fucking coping about
everyone in the world globalism that's all fucking made up bullshit
we still live in the same world
that you know of world war one and world war two and we live we in the cold war even we live in that world ok we live in a world
where
everything is based on a very delicate balance of
competing sovereigns
and disputed territories
and wars we live in that fucking world still we don't live in a happy globalist world where everyone's holding fucking hands
and bill clinton singing kumbayah
and everyone's raising charity for starving people in africas and and bono and fucking madonna
are on stage and doing
that's not the world we live on we live in ok we still live in that old world
sounds like you're kind of making a justification for might mix right
no i'm not i'm giving you a description of the world we live in
live in a world
where
if you make moves that threaten another country's security
that country's going to do something about it
you you ive russia tried to settle this peacefully
for eight years
uh did they
yes they did what they even got ukraine to sign the minsko agreements
according to which there would be a ceasefire
in the eastern ukraine
ah which ukraine decided to violate and which ukraine decided to throw out of the fucking window and say oh we don't agree with themn's agreements any more
because we were forced to sign them
well i mean they were technically under duress
but
yeah but those are agree ok and youre grant you anion have declared war then and not sign the agreements because it sign was agreements
if we are talking about agreements
well russia and the united states both violated the budapest referendum
ok
you mean the budapest memorandum
whatever do
in the budapest memorandum
dictated that ukraine give up all its nuclear weapons
or
you know in order to have security as a neutral power
ok
so and then russia
violated that guarantee
in twenty fourteen
and it is violated again
in twenty twenty two
the united states violated it prior to that
both when it sanctioned belarus which was a violation of the budapest memorandum
as well as when it helps
the might on coup if you deny the s is volve into the might on coup
the sanctions against belarus
they had violate the budapest memorandum
why did the sanctions of
because part of the budapest memorandum was that you could not use the powers of economic coeresion
to influence any of these states that were listed in the budapest memorandum and belarus is one of them
why was bellover sanctioned
and when doesn't fucking matter it was a violation of the budapest memorand no it doesn't
yeah because of some internal political bullshit
ilet's see
when but
look
there are bellarus sanctions right now
that are in place
timy the one that woulds a memorandum is thrown out the window
telling me tell me the ones that you're referring to that predate
the twenty fourteen
a invasion of
the nats in the guns
sure
they were
in twenty thirteen
aright
thank you
march
the
actually yet
i think also two thousand and seven there were some
when so ok
so
now that was an onic
i'm reading that
twenty twelve and twenty and thirteen belarus was subject to u k sanctions and e u sanctions
was it subject to
h
u s sanctions as well
yeah it was it t e u sanctions because i can't find a
source that it was subject
to us sanctions in twenty thirteen
i can only find you
and you k
ok in twenty thirteen
american sanctions were implemented against belarus
ok a is of
human rights violations and other illicit activities
of the government of belarus
so the u s responded that oh we didn't do sanctions against the people of belarus
just the government
ok so thesn't fuck it matter still violates those would haveps those are those are those are weasel words
i agree
is georgia listed on the budapest
memorandum
i doubt it
why do you doubt it
i don't know
jery
no it's not
what about
what about moldova
no it's not
alright then
h
i guess
i guess uh
it doesn't matter
that we signed that agreement
especially given
them
you know
russia has invaded ukraine now and nobody's playing by the rules
i guess
so
i will i will concede that the u s breached those sanctions
w when they when they sanction belarus
or they breached the agreement when they
when they've sanctioned bellars i will concede that
but
again i
i don't think that
all right thanks for the concession bye
like if so it hasn't happened in the baltics yet we haven't seen it anywhere else like
six
so funcky along
cicks so fucking along
what like is there i don't i disagree that there is an actual securityk you noblem appreciate youate you so much
i come on
i'm going to change the ten gift to something
for the twenty one
the interest in ukraine i think the interest lies more in the rebuilding of the empire and more of putin establishing his order farther out from moscow
yeah i mean i would just say that this is just um
it's sort of almost a willfully ignorant position and i understand
if you like guzzle state department propaganda i understand why you might say like well how could nato possibly pose a threat to russia it says it right here it's a defensive alliance you know once again the purpose of nato and i again i don't understand why you fuse to acknowledge this
the purpose of nato is to contain russia and contain means
we want to stop russia we want to prevent the influence of russia
you know that's a hostile action
ok and we're aimed at creating a sort of circle around russia we want to contain 's what nato is for and nato is
more than ten to one more powerful than russia
and so
nato then moving into the black sea moving into crimea moving into ukraine
one hundred kilometers from moscow
just by its very existence this this presents a security threat to russia you cand say all you wanty can't imagine a scenario well
american leaders talk about this stuff all the time i mean ever since
the russian incursion in the crimea and their support for the donbass we hear from american leaders
they say putin's a killer putin's a thought who's a dictator
and we know that it is the wet dream of the neo consent of the council on foreign relations in the state department to depose putin this is why western you know western agencies back
putin's opponents like navaly and some of the opposition parties we know that this is what america does they spy on russia we know that we back the anti putin resistance
it's the wet dream of the united states to have a color revolution in russia just like they had in ukraine just like that in georgia just like that in kazakhstan
and so the idea that we can't possibly fathom a scenario where russia would be threatened again ten more than ten to one that'd be like if i went outside your house with a tank and a nuclear bomb and a light machine gun and i came there and i fucking hate destiny i was like but don't worry i'm just here to protect like your neighbors or something
that is true
god
you guys remember when there was actual balance on switch
the's remember one theres
like
it there wasn't just destiny
with free reign and there was actually like
the sargan of akad guy and then this guy and whuufukas
he said it's defensive that's ok you know again you have to look at the history here of the cold war
the antagonism between the west and the east doesn't evaporate overnight and certainly
you know what destiny's the one who got him banned really
why did he get banned oh he got banned because of a
january sixth was it
once again
nato's founding purpose contain russian then it expands to russia's borders and to say like all this
you know russia has nothing to worry about here it's just a refusal to acknowledge the russian pers to get banned for
act in this o way after
america's got its blinders on
it cannot see its own culpability it has no ability
what did he get banned for
it was after the train wrecksit let me look it up
oh he shit on destiny and his baate with train wrecks
no fucking way
no this was six months after the capitoal riot
he got banned in twenty twenty one no he didn't
i was
streaming in twenty and twenty that was one year ago he was in't here and in july or june
isn't here in june
got banned in twenty nineteen
oh he got ban okay
which bn
we see
oh
apparently
some people are saying that it was because he was co streaming
is he was an affiliate and he was doing youtube and
witch streaming at once
this was a day after the debate with several known
oh fuck he got mass reported
o apparently he had a debate oh my god this was a day after he debated
destiny and fucking a
assan
for introspection and to say you know what is our role in the crisis di
they led a mass reporting campaign against them
you know are we enhancing you again the question
are we enhancing ukraines security at the expense of russia i mean the answer is undoubtedly yes and again
and you could the thing about the a bm is just not true
the a b m platforms can be converted into platforms that can launch offensive missiles in a matter of weeks i mean this is just
and you can look into this i'm not a military expert but this is what the experts say
the a b m shield we all know defensive capabilities can become often of capability
in a matter of weeks they do have to be converted but
the hardware is there and i would even get to some of the treaties and this is something i didn't get into in my opening statement and i really want to talk about the missiles i want to hear your take on this in two thousand and
the united states pulls out of the anti ballistic missile treaty which was signed under nixon
and for people who don't know
you know the united states and the soviet union agree we're not going to build anti bolistic missile systems because it undermines mutually sure destruction
if a country is creating a shield where i c b m s may not be effective
this is going to only cause an arms race where at we're countries will want to stockpile massive amounts of missiles and nuclear warheads because if they've got to go through a shield they're going to twice as many missile
so the soviet union in the united states agree ok noballistic missileshield
you know
shooting down missiles is not part of our doctrine because this would incentivize an arms race
well two thousand and one the united states pulls out of the treaty and says i you know what we're going to build an anti bolist missleshiel
and they saiy well don't worry russia that's because of iran and so they start implementing the a b m shield again which undermines mutually sure destruction russia can invest in this
a b m is very expensive it very complex russia does not have a capability so what we're talking about here
is the united states pursuing technology that would in a f
desney fvans mas reported him
i think the reason is because it was on train wrecks
and old boy
those destiny fans they are not used
do you like a neutral
normy twitchstreamer
platform
seeing that shot overwhelmingly pro
destiny's enemy
that probably like ate away at them and got to them you know
and it's very difficult and it's not you no weh're close to this
but it's the threat of it
create a system where they could potentially do a first strike against russia and russia cannot retaliate undermines mutually sure destruction again in twenty one thousand under trump the u s suspends
its treaty obligations to the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty they change american military doctrine and say that
you racist white nationalist
yea uh
i still have not like done any research or whatever i
i uh i care more about actions than beliefs you know i'm one of those guys who cares more about action than
suppose it believes
but
yeah i don't know
people go no you know you know i don't fuck and i don't really research these people you know
um
you know nick land says has said a lot of edgy shit
you know why i'm doing this
gocause
a i'm a nick land
reader i was very re influenced by nickline
nick land is the
the worst
he's work nick land believes in the extinction of humanity like you can't get any worse than that
you can't get any like darker than that like nick land is like the most
it's the most like nehlistic total a moral it's like it doesn't get any worse than that ok
um
it really doesn't get any worse than that
now s like that when ple s like all this guys really scary
yeah that's not really that scary to me you know scary is like
ah
yeah you don't know scary dude
the surface short and medium range ballistic missiles
are part of their military doctrine in eastern europe so we're talking about potentially
theoretically in a military engagement with russia launching surface to surface missiles from eastern europe into russia and russia says hey you know what's going on youre s i'm not easily scared that's what i've say i'm not easily scared
the a b m sh i'm just not
now we need to invest in hypersonic gliders and hypersonic missiles
you're undermining mutually sure destruction in twenty nine thousand russia says you're hang out this last point a because i'm going a little on mile
you know russia says hey you're redeploying missiles to europe he says you know why don't we just ban he says let's put a moratorium on all the missiles because you know what's going to happen is if you shoot a missile against us we don't know if it's nuclear or conventional
and until it lands so i mean that's something called warhead ambiguity
we would have to respond with a nuclear strike if we see a missile coming away the united states refuses to negotiate and the united states pulled out of the treaty first so you say how could they possibly be threatened it's like ok well nato is expanding its purpose is to continue i agreedrim it's about the substance of the debate
the missiles are coming with it the bases are coming with it they're pulling out of the b m treaty they're pulling out of the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty it's like
you know again does the united states have no ability to look and see ge andmy the problem so' like the a b m treaty is garbage why would you want to be part of a treaty weere only russia and the united states are signed onto it what about china what about
then why would you sign the fucking treaty
the democratic people's republic of north korea what about iran what about any other rogue state in the world that might obtain nuclear weapons so
i love het
that city got so buttered by hassan
he just became like a full nio con he's like what about iran what about north korea they're going to bomb us
the rogue stakes that are going to bomb us stop iran
he just became like this george w bush neo connu believes in the most
fuck and stupid gullible bullshit just because he got buttered that hassan
a grew late
twenty times bigger than him
like
i've never seen you know why you know why destiny has no principles at all
i'll tell you why
this is a guy who pretends he's got these firm solid principles no you fucking don't
you stop being friends with hassan
and your entire world view changed
your entire worldview about everything changed
just because you're a petty little bullshit fucking friendship bullshit
this might come down to a disagreement on the matter of facts and i
maybe we just disagree on this but my understanding is that it goes full war
that nuclear weapons i c b m are relatively sophisticated in terms of how they launch and the deployment systems for the nuclear ward you can put mervs on these things a single missile can fire off like one hundred different warheads some which might be nuclear some which might be dummy that there are thousands of these things on both sides i don't believe that anybody believes that anybody on the russian or u s side has anywhere near the capability right now to stop a legitimate second strike threat from any country that if if either side launches a nuke everything's going into the air and
there is no shot that across the entire geography of the united states we have the capability to stop not only whatever weapons are shot from russia but whatever pops out of the ocean whatever psu of the civic atlantic whatever i pin there's just there's no reliable way right now to stop you got mogged and decided to become a neolib
it's literally what happened russia's second strike capabilities have not been freatened and my understanding is that the a b m treaty is seen as kind of bullshit for the same reasons why some of the climate accords are seen as kind of bullshit the united states doesn't want to necessarily play climate games when people like india or china have so many exemptions from these same things same thing with the a b m treaties like that's great that the united states and russia might come to some agreement but i don't know what north korea iss doing i don't know what iran is doing i don't know if i want to hamper my own abilities to deter a nuclear threat from one of the smaller states i don't believe that russia's nuclear
ability to a compromise i'm pretty confident saying that because if they were i feel like putin would be screaming that from the rooftops every single day i think i would be the first thing out was notow every time he talks because for however much i might hate russia and however much i might hate nuclear weapons some level of mutually sure destruction is probably good in maintaining some level of peace between countries you knowd your head but i mean ukraine probably felt that way too before they deposed of their nuclear arms and then russia invaded them when they no longer had the ability defend themselves from another nuclear power from invasion
in terms of like being afraid of a color revolution i mean now we've gone from we're worried that the united states might lead a nato invasion from ukraine into russia into what are usually the liberal arguments of well if russia sees a thriving happy democracy on its border
this was the moment i like i was like a ga he's never
there's no recovery from the stupidity there's none
it's more west facing maybe the people in russia are going to be really upset and they're going to revolt and there's going to be issues there
that is not what a color revolution is that's not what a fucking color revolution is
no color revolution in history has ever happened that way
ok second of all
is ukraine going to become a thriving happy democracy i don't know ask romania ask bulgaria
ask fuck in bulgaria
ok
ask bulgaria and romania and all these other fucking countries
that
you know
aren't really faring particularly better than russia is
while they're in the e u
mean ok
even put like ok but let's do it just g d p per capital
russia vers bul garia g d p per capital
y russia has a higher g d pe per capita
then bulgaria was checked romania
russia has a higher g d p per capita than romania let's check
poland should at least have one more than russia
right
poland's got to have a higher gdp
per capital
uh
okay according to this
russia is just seven hundred dollars a year behind poland
and it's seventy third in the world in poland's and sixty nine place which is especially telling
considering poland was historically wealthier than the soviet union
in the eastern block
under the warsaw pact
m as far as i remember i don't know i could be wrong about this
but poland had a better living standard than the soviet union did
hungary's gota be way better than russia though right
at least hungry's got to be way better right
a
it's got to be way better right
hungary has historically been
much wealthier thean
we're not much but just wealthier
a so hungary has eighty percent debt to g d p ratio russia has twenty percent
but yeat hungary's got a fifteen thousand and russia's only got ten thousand
apparently right
yeah hungary is pretty wealthy it's ranked forty fourth
but that's not because of the oh no no that's sorry sorry fox fox fo
uh g d p per capita
yeah hungary's ranked forty fifth
and
russias ranked fifty fifth
so it's thirty
oh actually in terms of p p p which actually matters more
oh no they measure it by p p p actually by purchasing power
hungary is not that much wealthier than russia it's only eleven percent more wealthy
it's only eleven percent more wealthy and keep in mind that
hungary has always had a better standard of living
since the warsaw pack days
and the soviet union
so it's actually not that significant
so what is destiny actually talking about
riving about what do you mean the e u doesn't make countries that are very
or
wealthy it does'en it's never done that
there's not a single example of a
eastern poor eastern european country that suddenly had a giant and massive increase in standard of living
because of joining the fucking e u
me does he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about it's so laughably fucking stupid
color revolutions don't happen because people
look at actual model successes
color revolutions happen
because
people look at america germany and france and the uk you're not going to fuck and be like that because that's the imperial corps and you're in the periphery and they see you as a fucking peasant you'll never be like that
if you submit to their rules
you know
like people people look at these like western europeanaus we col be i got n know you fuck and can't
you really can't
that doesn't seem to be a good argument for russia invading ukraine because they're so scared that some successful country on their border might you know instigate some
revolution of their own borders unless i guess you want to take a step further that's not what a color a color revolution doesn't happen when you have like this
spontaneous revolution
call the revolutions happen
when they're funded and organized and
created artificially by foreign actors
talk about g d p but like social justice accountability
yeah but what people give a fuck a he was talking about like flourishing and thriving
people care about
putting bread on their table they don't give a fuck about like this
you know
this other dumb shit
in any decisive way
gk
you will care about what puts bread on the table
you want to know why there's protests in russia sometimes because people are having tough times paying the bills
that's just the fuck and truth
the only way you ever get like popular support for any color revolution
is by taking advantage of economic grievances
otherwise it doesn't have popular support
you know i get it urbanites tend to like give a fuck about
you know shit
but the majority people don't
wether and say it's all said and yeah and yeah
ga guy just like germany
to c i all
operatives on the ground you know fomenting distruct you know i'm so sick of these like
there's so many you know how many people from from fuck in lebanon or wherever the fuck else in the middle east they come they're like
go know
we need to be hoart on ourselves
why can we be not switzerland
but look how they do their money in switzerland
what is our excuse
in the switzerland
they are wealthy
we must become western
we must have the democracy
it's not how fucking works i don't know why i can't do an airborg accon right now
thpinking of the french accent
we must have democracy
is i can't do it because i don't even know any fucking actual people like that
i don't actually know people who are like this i just know they exist
i don't know how they sound
i don't know how people sound who say shit like this i don't it's actually baffling
i only know french people who say this shit
you must have a democracy
if you are becoming a weasternized
no that's bored
if you are becoming westernized
you will have a democracy
that you will need
no i'm fucking it talan i don't wans going on guys i don't wants go on i'm usually good at accents
in the government i
i don't i don't i just i don't think it's a good argument for so many people i they're young and they love em on usk in their take visionaries where the buck
and they're like the elite of every country that
there's a lot of that in latin america
there's a lot of that
the being able to invade ukraine
um
backing up i have to ask because you keep mentioning and you keep repeating these points about nato is aggressive alliance nato was en circling russia
when has n nato taken aggressive action against russia
by expanding eastward dummass the alternate if you're asking
have they initiated nuclear war no
yea i need that bubble bass guy to teach me the french ajaccon
and if these avian platforms are so threatening why is it that i think just last in february biden is literally allowing he's welcoming putin to come and inspect these platforms of course he wants to be able to inspect platforms in russia as well why would we allow them to do that if the at tack is so easy to swap out you know you say that it can happen in a matter of weeks i mean russia surveillance will catch that is not like you' could to be moving the stuff around and changing up these platforms entirely without anybody seeing that happening you know surveillance is where it is right now in twenty twenty two
yes
what is the threat that nato represents to russia what is the threat is the perceived security risk aside from russia not being able to invade partnering countries
yeah so i've never said that nato thes a nato invasion in russia that's going to happen or nato i didn't say it's it's an aggressive alliance
i said that the founding purpose of nato is to contain russia
so it's not like this is just an alliance l g you know we just we all want to have safety and security it's like you know we are shoring up these countries against russia russia cannot join nato
you know they would not permit russia to join it's you know
would that be great for world security if the united states and russia were in an alliance that i meinan that would probably be the best thing for world peace but russia
is precluded from joining because nato is an anti russian alliance and you could just as easily say russia's never invaded a nato county
russias never invaded the nato country russia has never invaded
a western country that never invaded the united states or anything like that and yet there's this fear that they're going to invade
and the point is you know russia's borders are not
on the border of germany but nato's borders are now on the border of russia
the and i've said this before
the mere numbers itself speak to the threat
you know this is a counter russian alliance which outspends russia ten to one which is now on their border in the black sea in crimea
and you know what's the security threat posed
how about an a b m shield how about surface to surface ballistic missile stationed all over ukraine surface to surface missiles whi can reach
russia in five minutes and are unstoppable and indistinguishable from a nuclear warhead
what's the potential risk
and you know again a lot of this has to do with something called security dilemma it's not to say that
you know because i'll grant you it ma may seem outlandish oh it is nato going to invade russia you know probably not anytime soon
but it's like
the job of moscow the job of the russian government is to secure russia against all threats if there is this capability
that nato with this again ten to one massive military far more sophisticated
and more stuff and far out fens and bigger pots
anno russia wanted to join nato
from the beginning
population off it's on their border
that in itself is a threat that existence of all that concentrated power
and that trip wire right on the border it's a huge stret
and even you know going back to the a b m shield
i'll grant you is there a legitimate reason for the united states to pull out of the a b m shieldh absolutely you're right china' is not a part of it and there are rogue states that are nuclearrizing so i understand what you're saying
but this does nothing for russia
because
you know now and you're right the a b m shield is far from working right it's very
we don't know how to shoot down i c b s reliably yet
but
the united states pulls out of the a b m treaty with no regard for
how this affects russian american generals say the plan was to build the largest nato base in ukraine damn
in doctrine russia cannot spend on a b m a b m is very expensive it's very complex they don't have the means for that
and so when the united states says like we're going to create an a b m shield over don't worry we're going to put it throughout europe we're put it in poland we're going to put it over here
which could theoretically in a theoretical context
prevent russia from doing retaliatory strike
this is a very provocative thing towards russia you may say oh russia's got nothing to worry about but that's the american perspective what about the russian perspective where it's like jeep
are they going to build an a b m shield that and they will have the ability even if the united states he should know to strike russia with impunity that would be enough to present a security threat to russia which is the point and so there's almost no consideration it's like oh well come on they're not going to be oh come on that's not a big deal what about the russian perspective what about if you're russia
and you see missiles coming ukraine and you see the a b m shield pull up and they're pulling out of the treaties and theater support missiles are now back on the table in europe and you say well why wouldn't talk about this he did
he did in twoentousyd and twenty one in november
putin re in two thousand and twenty when the united states formally pulled out of the intermediate range nuclear treaty russia said listen i've got a proposal let's put a moratorium on all the missiles in europe
the united states didn't respond in november twentusyd and twenty w reiterate he said i've even got a more detailed proposal and we're going to inspect the sites and you can inspect our sites
and it's a robust mechanism no response in december twoentousy and twenty one in a press conference pt comes and says
i don't know why the west isn't talking about my missile proposal in january january eleventh twelth and thirteenth that the geneva talks
they say agree with us on missiles even the american security experts say that there's room for common ground he did better than me
you can't really compare it he did very well
but the reason you can't compare it is be caause
destiny
showed respect in his debate
he kept his mouth shut
he didn't do any insults
and he behaved
you know
he never did that in our debate
but they don't reced to the demands because you know we don't negotiate with dictators where we will not be i is thats hes terrified of this guy
not allows it by dictators
so it's like you know what more can you do when they're deploying missiles that can strike russia in five minutes on their border and the purpose of the alliance is to contain russia yet a lot of mutual respect
i don't think there's mutual respect
i think
this guy nick he
i don't know him that well but he strikes me as a
conservative young man
what i mean by that is that
he he doesn't he see i feel like he's he will be civil to anyone you know
he will keep it polite he won't
resort to attacks
and this cheap games he'll just kind of like
so be conservative and polite right
whereas
but i don't i don't think he actually respects you know he's just
that's by the way that's how you're supposed to act as a human being
in general as a human being
even if you don't let's say there's a dude who shares his wife
you still have to like outwardly
present
some civil respect
even if you don't respect them deep down right
that's like a hypothetical random hypothetical on wind anything else
but it's a random hypothetical like you still have to like
you know keep up the veneer of respect
but if they start to disrespect you then all bets are off and you can just roast the shit out of
right
nato never invaded russia russia also never invaded nato but whos expanding on whose border with their missiles and military base
who's got the defensive alliance which is designed to fight russia you know
it's not right so so keep i keep hearing this over and over again and maybe this is we've hitse fascist tell the truth now all right
i take
yeah you i don't know i have a different brain than you i don't i don't think like m
i don't put labels first
i hear what i hear how people behave
and what they say first
and the labels come after
rock bottom we keep saying the purpose of the alliance is to contain russia contain russia from doing what
invading their neighboring countries like if russia didn'tengage in these actions it shouldn't really matter it's not like this is containing or trying to contain russia in an economic sense like we're cutting them off from trade deals or like we're trying to blockade their cruisers or we're trying to compromise their ability to move anything throughouter world like this isn't the case we talk about like containing russia and it sounds like we're saying we don't want to contain russia from invading countries on their border that's just that that explanation
just defies logic to me you know we talk about this idea that again we're always framing this in the case of u s security interest versus russian security interest is ukrainian security interest just not at play here do we just not care about this and like ukraine has a genuine security interest in that they want themselves to be a sovereign country the right to decide which alliances they will or will not join and the idea that there might be nato bases here in the future that biden is open to inspection the idea that down the road maybe
second strike capabilities are lost in russia and now they just get nuked by the uss we cand do so with impunity maybe that will happen thirty years from now so now today we need to take over ukraine i don't know i just i totally don't buy that as a reason i feel like you could use that same justification then for russia to essentially invade anybody they want that's near their borders and isn't claimed up by nato yet which if is the case then that's an even stronger argument for nato expansion every nato country feels likell holy shit literally these four letters are the only thing that keep my country from being invaded by putin
damn natal membership sounds like a pretty good thing right now
and i just i don't see i don't feel like you've established a credible threat to russia you keep mentioning like the surface to surface missiles that can reach moscow in five minutes i mean like if we were in like the fifties maybe this would matter that we've lost second strike capabity because oh no the whole government is wiped out nbody even saw the missile coming but this isn't the case anymore their continuity of government exists there are submarines all over the world by from every nuclear power that's capable of emerging in the pacific or in the atlantic and nuking you know shooting god knows how many nuclear missiles that god knows
how many targets if second strike is something that needs to happen
you're not losing second strike unless sir
i'm looky it's not
to have from medalicure solid some crazy anti ballistic shield where you yourself say the technology doesn't exist yet we're nowhere near that yet but
and yeah the idea that surface to surface missiles might exist in some part of these nato that's crazy how smirors in the chat
trees that are again open to only streamed like a few times but
it' a go weird point of view
inspection fro russian leaders that this somehow justifies russia invading these countries for hypothetical security interests in the future i just don't think that argument is strong enough
well in
here's a thing even if you think all my arguments are russian propaganda
like the reason why you know because i know the nato science is all the you know the security thing is just a pretext for russian revanism a all propaganda what would even give russian propaganda credibility if that's what this was
is the fact that nobody on the nato side will
i mean they won't even begin to acknowledge
how russia might have a legitimate security concern like again you just sort of handwave away oh so what maybe in thirty years russia can't retaliate so what maybe they develop an a b m fel so what you have service to serviace missiles forward deployed in ukraine like big deal
that is a really big deal that is a really big threat to russia and that nato was formed to contain russia we say contain we mean
we want to suffocate russia that's the goal of the nato alliance that's a goal now of nato expansion is to prevent russia from influencing its neighbors from
and by the way that's just what great power politics is a countries seek to influence their neighbors it just so happens at the entire western hemisphere and western europe is a fpear of influence of the united states of america and everybody knows full well that if russia deployed the same capab
yeah we should stream together more
when samyra when you wake up
you just don't sleep right
alities to cuba if cuba was in a defensive alliance
if cuba joined the warsaw aact
if russia deployed surface to surface missiles in cuba they had a base in cuba
everybody knows the united states would not tolerate
everybody knows united states and you could say oh well cuba's right guys our podcast is coming very soon
thing like next week
next thursday
and so on
but the foreign policy establishment in the united states would not tolerate it they wouldn't
nobody even dream of tolerating that
anywhere in the western hemisphere
not in cuba not in venezuela not in bolivia not in nicagua nowhere
but we're able to shore up in crimea crimea historically russian clay ok ian this is a seventy year
flupe
that crimea belongs to the autonomous part of ukraine
it's just nonsense
we should have dougan on
the podcast actually
the idea that we have a nato base i think he's c e o of channel one news now so he might
you might not be too busy but
crimea it's just like unfathomable
for this russian security operativet cannot allow that i mean they just can't a good conscience allow that kind of a security threat and you i mean you won't even
interact with that argument it's like well i mean it probably won't happen it's probably like not a big deal well for the russians it clearly is and
and the point is to say this
you know in this stuff about like a thriving democracy and weile ukraine shos this stuff is really semantics what we're talking about here is two great powers two empires
and they're dugging it out over a formally neutral ground that's what it is
ukraine is you know neutral ostensibly somewhat under russian influence and i would say truly is neutral because in two thousand and
right you get you shanko
and yanukovich wasn't this pro russian stooge that people make come out to be you know he tried to balance
the west against russia definitely lean closer russia
ukraine was truly a buffer neutral state if not leaning slightly towards russia
right
and the point is you know that std and maybe to get more fundamentally to the heart of the issue
why is there a conflict here in ukraine what caused this
we cannot acknowledge the fact that we have catalyzed this by trying to wrest control of ukraine from moscow it's about two empires competing over neutral state
and h you know it's to say oh well it's about democracy or this one or that one shows
it's got to do with missile placement it's got to do with mutually sure destruction it's got to do with all these things and people will again acknowledge the ukrainian security interest the american security interest but not the russian and you know i just don't
i'm not getting from you that you really understand what that means for the russians like i'm fully willing to concede like
yeah i get why youkin want to be part of nato i get why they don't want you goin to be part of nato it's part of their policy of containment
but there's no willingness on the other side to say you know let's give russia the benefit of the doubt maybe it is legitimate security concerns w under
to erode mutually sure destruction which has been in place for forty years maybe this is an antagonist towards russia to put surface to surface missiles reintroduce you know reintroduce where they were not in one thousand reintroduc ter support missiles as the backbone of american military doctrine like there's no willingness to say like you know gee russia maybe has legitimate
opposition to that it's like oh no no no that's just all an excuse because russia's evil and russia wants to invade everybody and it's like
that's belied by the fact that russia has out spent ten more than ten to one by the we anti russian alliance we can keep bring up that the ten to one spending i thinks doing anying
dugan and imran hussein
i think separate would
maybe
two separate segments because
it'd be too chaotic you know
but maybe the same day but just
like back to back but
both of them at the same time would be way too chaotic
building argument i can i can acknowledge that russia that putin might perceive there to be a security interest i can acknowledge it
yeah i can acknowledge that perception exists and i say my because we both agree here that nato has never made an aggressive move to such a dummance
ud
nato has never made an aggressive move because that is nuclear holocaust
it's that fucking simple stop saying they've never made an aggressive move
if
by an aggressive move you mean an encroachment upon russia's territory
that's a world war three ok
everything else at their disposal they've made aggressive moves everything else that's been at their disposal
everything else
towards russia if they were contlicts made aggressive move forwards nato which is a good reason for ukraine to join nato so that they
stop being fucked with by russia that's
why are they being fucked with destiny
has russia bucked with ukraine in any capacity before twenty fourteen
if so how
that's an argument for ukraine joining nato but the fact that nato can expand to include ukraine
when we both agree that nato doesn't attack russia i mean like we have special phone lines installs and there's conflict in the middle east the u s will cliterarly call russia and say hey you have any guys there we don'tant to blow your owneopleup accident
because they don't want nuclear war
and like we go out of our way right now to ensure that there isn't conflict between nato and russia and even if i can acknowledge that there might be a perception on the russian side that there might be a security with thats andy ultimately doesn't understand
is that there's actually a balance of power beyond mutually assu destruction
like
there are ways to leverage your geostrategic
advantage over enemies
when it comes to international sanctions when it comes to the
but wercing them to adopt certain policies
when it comes to them to adopting certain economic policies
when it comes to them i
trying to influence the domestic affairs of a country
this is there's a fine line between just directly invading a country
and using your military leverage is a subtle way to coerce and bully a country into submission
interest here that perception doesn't supersede ukraine's right to self determination and if you want to gi for the gift that
take the boy i'm going to pis guize i'll be right back
i'll be right back
ot of jack
with objectsion
i did not take a shit
i took a piss
but i was on my phone
realist analysis of this that's fine but you're not getting any normativity from that you're not telling me whether russia's you know decision is right or wrong or whether it's morally or whatever justified you're just telling me that russia will seek to basically annex whatever inhiber it can if it perceives there to be a security threat which again is just a stronger argument for a moreggressive
russia's not annexing all of ukraine what the fucg are you talking about
of expansion of nato when you use a realist perspective on russia's dealings with its neighbor all you're doing is revitalizing the arguments for a nato alliance and that's really
that it he is like
yeah like
russia risk retaliating for slapping it across the face is all the more reason why we need to keep slapping it across the face
because if we don't the retaliate
what are you fucking saying
all that' happened if we don't
slap russia across the face they're going to punch us
what is your evidence well i slapped them across the face and they punched us so that that's your evidence
begin my argument you've got countries like sweden and finland that are looking to join nato since two thousand and fourteen in russia's invasions of crimea you started to see active nato military forces being deployed to places like estonia latviaan and lithuania and act seeing dylan's face for the first time
where can i react to that
where can i react to that
all the realist perspective does here is give us an even stronger argument for why nato needs to expand to include these central asian and eastern european countries because if they don't then russia is going to seek to invade them
ok but again this belies the fact that nato expanded first i mean itself so nato expands to thirteen countries over twenty years to former warsaw pack countries to former russian states to form a russian sphere of influence
russia draws a red line it you can't take ukraine ukraine is so vitally strit
particularly import you can't take it ittos a well we're expanding there anyway you know that's too bad and then russia response and you go see that justifies why we've been expanding for twenty years there's huges proves that there's not i le' you going that just proves
that's like but nato expanded first the united states pulled out the a b m treaty at ao one they pulled out of the nuclear intermediate nuclear forces treaty in nineteen
they expanded to thirteen countries before two thousand and
and then when russia finally respond in twenty fourteen a red line was crossed
and then they don't go see that's why we're expandish but jackson it's because he is terrified of fuinas
he's actually terrified of them
see that just goes to show why you need nato it's like
and the point is
on the real issue is that he's actually got a huge chat
these are like the meanest most
toughest guy a political chat on the internet
oh my god if you think these guys
these guys think they're toxic or whatever they're nothing
ity would get eaten for breakfast
and would need psychotherapy
perspective
what what is our foreign policy what are we trying to do because i mean and to the point
getting back to the conflict which is ongoing in ukraine
i don't like conflict
i don't like when people die ukraine i don't like when ukraine's destroyed this is not in anybody's interest this is not
good for ukraine obviously this is not good for america this is not good for russia
but what led us to this point
you know i fail to see why because there was no imminent threat of a russian invasion in ukraine
the problem was that zelenski was unwilling or hoorshenko too unwilling to give up donbass unwilling to give up rimia unwilling to give up their aspirations to nato a about destinyes like i am winning over nickch
he's like i have to be complee cool and composed because
i'm trying to win over you know what these guys do
what destiny and voss do is like they win over they win over like the weak links
from the the far right
all of the weaklings in the far right they like they kind of drain them out
you know
is the far right they're brutal and they they bully the weak over there
and all of these like nerds who are like
these ugly fat fucks they're like
i'm sicked of being buried desthin they came to save me and then they
destiny comes in fuck and rescues them
and the reason that they th that ukraine was so inbolden is because nato said we got your back ukraine would never dare to stand up to russia and pope them like they do but they think that
they've got nato they get to go to congress and demand a no fli zone and it's like
so what is the in realist terms in terms of how states actually behave not normatively not how they ought to behave but in terms of how we know states act
and in terms of how we can expect states to act
expanding nato to ukraine or even even talking about that is a provocative action but we have done that ever since two thousand and eight
and that is what has led to the current crisis and you could argue in in a hypothetical timeline does russia and be ukraine without the nato aspirations
we can't know that
but we also can't you know arrive at the situation was that i met
infrared
people in person at the c p i conference
all of them have
the energy they all have like this aura
of baseness
they don't have thisl louce
bucking noodlely energy that you get from destiny's people
they all have a firm solid earthly energy you know
they all have this earthly energy about them
that's just solid i can't even fuck and explain it
right
where's destiny
oh god it's just the fucking circuss
oh we should
without analyzing our own behavior
and saying you know all of our actions provoked russia because
you know at the end of the day
we have to talk in terms of the tangible the real this is a real outcome and it's really bad and this is a failure ultimately of american policy
and you could point the blame at russian you know hold your arm say well you know russia just evil and you know they're just doing evil things you have to blamerussia beauss are evil and so on and you know we have no culpability
but of course in great power politics yes we have culpability we're global in a regional head of min so we do have to have some interesspection analyze how did our collective policy out of our policy of collective security russian containment
did that play a role in provoking russia to engage in a conflict where nobody wins
we have to look at it like that and on
and i think you'll find that these policies rundertaking it's naive to say that they're just so they're just so goody two shoes in nature all you know youukin running nto it's totally not yeah you know what i want
i went to modern day debate and saw destiny's fans
holy fuck and shit
are fans verses his
in a room
holy fox
holy fall
but it's totally about thank you j p
bart
don't criticize it like oh you know sec countries want sovereignty it's sejurity who can blame them for that it's like well look at the other side
it's a negotiation everybody's security interested and we're only outnumbered
paid attention to it not in an event in an irellavan the people who would attend that
it wouldn't be our numbered
for russia but russia has guns too and a realist world order you have to pay attention to these things otherwise you get a crisis
and then i want to say one thing and then
here's the other thing
you know let's entertain a scenario where ukraine joins nato
you know because they're still pushing for even after the crisis in fourteen
what's cose today
what's that of course yes let's say ukraine becomes a nato member state ok what the do
well guess what crimea
is still formally occupied by russia don bass and the civil war between kev and don bass is still ongoing
so what happens then
when the government in kiv is at war with russian back proxies and don bass
as a quite as a consequence of ukraine joining nato you now have a proxy war in ukraine a proxy civil war
between russian backed separatist and and the know member state
what's more
he have does not acknowledge the russian annexation of crimea i mean they do not
accept this fact so
you know
that now we're in a really bad security spot where
and you could say oh this would never happen beus people never do this but i mean you of course of course these things can happen what happens if there's a war between russia and ukraine over crimea what happens when there is a
you know there's this ongoing proxy war between russian back separatists in don bass and ukraine and i've heard the argument people says he says well
you know nato' is defensive so article five obligations are
invoke if we attack russia or something
but as we know the fog of war is thick and as to who started which conflict of course would benefit ukrainians to say oh well russia attacked us ow we need to folld nato response to crimea
the point is
this is a you don't need to be pro russian or pro american you don't need to be an expert to say that's a really fucked up situation it is a bad situation have a nato member state
with disputed territory in crimea
and a proxs of war and donbesst
like that
that is probably the biggest threat to world war three in the entire world that's probably the
you know so that american policymakers would seriously consider this in spite of what's going on the moment that russia made crimea the united states s is put thisus on danger because that's ok they have bunkers we don't
you know what it's too too complicated we can't get involved
but even in twenty twenty one they're saying we're going to haves our strategic partnership ukraine to become a part of nato it's like we know that russia' is not giving up crimea we know that the thing in don bass is going to be resolved any time soon so even if we chieve our aspirations all this would do is create a situation a power gag that could absolutely lead to world war three maybe
be the number one cause of world war three if that would happen
sure so
so that's ne sor
sorry
charites
chairs
chair
sure
are you sure
are you sure
you guys
i
i
i
i
i
we're at our six hour mark guys i will see you tomorrow we're going to finish it tomorrow we're going to finish the debate tomorrow don't worry i don't got i don't got all like i don't got another two hours b
i don't got another two hours i don't gt all night i don't got all night k
i' see them on
see tomw
my cutting in short
am i cutting it short
my cutting it short
am i cutting it short
have
ex
my cutting is short
a kind of am
i kind of am cutting it short
one of them
miss you good night
as it's one thirty
ok
one thirty
see tomorrow
continue tomorrow
o
been a long time
been a long time
tomal didn't you get baned
didn't you get banned from twitch
a guys
sear
bye bye
do tomw