Why Communists Should Support Canada's Truckers

all right

so

convoy pulled up

and now

we're going to get to the bottom of this

whole thing because a lot of people seem

to be confused about this whole convoy

thing

and what it means

a lot of people seem to be confused

about what this whole thing means

so i made a simple tweet

made a simple tweet

so it started here

the canadian truckers

represent a spontaneous working-class

uprising at its most raw

real and authentic level

the fact that this is even a debate or

up for negotiation

prove that western marxism has nothing

in common with marxism feminism

so we got some responses to this and i'm

going to highlight these responses

you understand our convoy has broken

some brains and it looks like some

people need to learn

yeah this dumbass in my chat president

zielenski of ukraine so zelensky is

aligned with the deep state he's aligned

with the democrats he's aligned with

trudeau the canadian liberals and nato

and of course he's going to say oh

they're petite bourgeois they're not

working class because they own their own

trucks and that means they're not

working class and there's a whole lot

we're going to go through and talk about

on the stream

and by the end of this stream i'm gonna

guarantee you i'm gonna guarantee you

and tell you something by the end of the

stream

in good faith if you do not walk away

agreeing with me you're a fucking idiot

by the end of the stream

now this dude these people q whatever

his name was this dude was bothering me

when i was on my android i was at the

gym on my android so i didn't have time

to pull up all these sources and

statistics and shit we're actually gonna

get to the bottom of it we're gonna get

to the bottom of it here and now and

we're going to be taught and i will make

this a video we're going to be talking

about that convoy you understand we're

getting to the bottom of it now you

understand we got some responses to this

shut the fuck up president zielenski you

fucking idiot how about you get in my vc

because i'm going to break down every

facet of every possible argument in this

bitch

so actually this is how yara responded

to me

first of all

i'm going to tell you a few things

that you have to understand when it

comes to this whole convoy

first thing

right off the bat i don't want to hear

about

nazi flags and confederate flags

those

are not representative of the fucking

freedom convoy there was like one guy

who went there and they took a photo op

and then he was kicked out that's what

happened to the confederate guy i'm sure

the same thing happened to the nazi flag

guy you understand so don't come at me

and tell me about oh there was not there

was a nazi flag at the convoy that was

an op that was an op a an op by the

british intelligence or someone else the

cia could fucking delegitimize the

convoy movement in the eyes of the

people the media intentionally

misrepresented that movement one or two

guys came with those fucking flags and

nothing else all you have to do is send

the guy with a fucking nazi flag to

delegitimize an entire movement and an

entire protest yeah you may buy that in

your mainstream media bubble where you

are in your little like bubble where you

actually think that's how shit works

zelinski shut the fuck up because i'm

gonna fucking actually blow the fuck out

of every argument you're making about oh

the owner operator and employer trucker

distinction we're actually gonna talk

about that okay so you're gonna have to

wait every possible argument you've

thought of i've already destroyed five

steps ahead of you so shut the fuck up

okay

i'm specifically going one by one every

single argument against

communists seeing in the convoy

the working-class movement

you understand

yes many of the people in the freedom

convoy are sikh

many of them are

okay i'm gonna read you something i

can't show it to you because it's a

swastika

but i can read it to you

so the photo of the swastika flag

was taken

in the terrace

of the building the photographer was

standing on the lower part of the

terrace

the people with the flags are standing

on the steps you want to know what that

means it means it was staged it's not

like someone showed up to a protest and

just saw nazi flags it was staged to

make it seem like the protesters are a

bunch of nazis and if you believe that

you're a fucking idiot i'm gonna break

this down to you very simply

why would truck drivers be why would

this be about being a nazi they're truck

drivers what does that have to do with

being a nazi truck drivers are

protesting vaccine mandates why the fuck

would that be grounds for

the confederate flag or the nazi flag

i'll tell you why because the media is

basically saying

because a lot of these people are white

and this game is this is the game they

play

they do this race bullshit using

minorities against the the population

they're the racist they're used to

trying to divide people based on race

because a lot of these convoy people

happen to be white they're trying to

spook the population by saying oh

they're white supremacists and they're

racist and that's why they're doing this

and it's a it's a tactic they're doing

and i'll tell you why they're doing this

tactic because if the poor migrant

minorities in canada unite with those

convoy people that will be the end of

the canadian ruling class so they're

trying to divide them and it goes both

ways i know it goes both ways but if

those convoy people those truckers unite

with those indentured servants in canada

with those immigrants that spells the

end of the canadian ruling class so

they're trying to divide people based on

race trying to divide the working class

and that's what's actually fucking going

on with this shit it's a tried and

tested tactic that they've always

fucking used to divide the people

they've always used this fucking tag so

they staged a photograph of someone with

a swastika and that's what everyone's

saying is defining the movement one

fucking photograph one fucking op they

fucking did and all of a sudden they're

all nazis they're all fascists the

professional managerial parasites

seething with venom have hatred in their

hearts

for the working class and for the people

you want to know why because the working

class and the people they humble them

these fucking truckers are the ones

delivering their fucking amazon packages

to their fucking high-rise fucking

apartments and that's what's going on

here

so we're not even gonna discuss this

bullshit about them being nazis or being

whatever because that swastika was

staged the confederate shit that guy was

kicked out

he was not welcome the working class

runs this world that's exactly right

argument number two and this is what

these dumbasses in my chat are getting

at and everyone seems to be pointing out

oh my god

wait a second

aren't you a communist haas you are a

communist aren't you

well

the canadian truckers

are vocally anti-communists and they're

against communism and and they're

ideologically not aligned with you what

do you think you think they're just

going to become communists is that what

you think are you deluded

i'm going to do of you a favor

i'm gonna do you a favor because

i think you should google this

so i think you should go on wikipedia

and you don't even have to read the

whole thing

but just read this part just read this

part of wikipedia right

and then come back to me

with that shit you're saying about how

ideologically they're not aligned with

you has because i think you're fucking

confused about what's going on here i

think you're really confused about the

relationship between ideology and class

and we're gonna actually have to break

it down right so google materialism and

marxism on you just google it and just

read wikipedia or something because

you're so fucking ignorant of basic

marxism you're gonna bring up to me the

argument that ideologically ideology

doesn't even fucking matter that much

when we're talking about this why should

ideology

matter that much i mean ideology does

have a place and i'll explain that place

i'll explain that place but this is just

stupid do you think politics is about

ideas or about classes

and it's that simple is it a is it about

ideas or is it about classes i know that

these convoy people are not

ideologically aligned with me

so we have a dumb fuck in my chat who

came a little too late i'm not repeating

myself because i just fucking addressed

their their fascist argument but we're

past that point and now we're talking

about the anti-communism okay now we're

talking about the anti-communism part

because we already debunked the thing

about them being nazis or fascists we

already debunked that stupid bullshit

king leak get in my fucking vc and

defend that point

because i already literally just

addressed it okay now the second thing

is about the anti-communism we're gonna

have to restart we know they're

ideologically anti-communist

we know they harbor many beliefs that

i don't agree with those beliefs

congratulations

they're libertarians the exact opposite

of communism you're a fucking idiot the

world is not defined by ideology it's

not defined by ideology it's defined by

material class struggles certain

ideologies often give form to that class

struggle that are unscientific that are

not necessarily correct that doesn't

mean you define the class phenomena in

terms of the ideology i don't know why

that's not intuitively self-evident to

you if you're a marxist if you're a

marxist you understand

class struggle is the substrate around

which ideology is an attempted

reflection okay now ideology has a place

and i will explain that place but first

and foremost like when you go and talk

to a working class person this is what i

want to ask these people i don't know

who this person yara whoever these

people are hypothetically you go and

talk to a working class person are you

actually gonna define the substance of

what they're saying in terms of like

discrete ideas you're gonna say oh your

axioms are different from my axioms

you're like vosh then you're literally

vosh you're not a marxist you're not a

materialist you're vosh you think that

the essence of things is the idea the

form the form you're a formalist you

believe it's the form of the idea now

what a materialist does when they talk

to a working class person so let's say

this person is going and saying these

goddamn communist liberal elites you

know what a communist does they just

kind of they just they let it go over

their head and they just say okay

whatever he's saying the communism thing

what he's really talking about though

right technically actually he's not

correct in the academic sense let me put

on my monocle and just didn't fucking

scold him for not being academically

correct what a stupid fucking mentality

you have to understand that the there is

a difference between the essence and the

appearance of things and that's what's

fucking important there is a difference

between the essence and appearance of

things okay so when these people express

and they're railing against communism

here are the relevant questions you have

to ask and i can't fucking believe i

have to walk people through this marxism

101 like i can't fuck it's literally

beyond my understand that i have to

fucking explain this right here's what

you do ask yourself the question

what do they mean by communism what does

communism mean for them

what are they referring to in material

reality by communism what is actually

the essence behind the form and behind

the appearance now an idealist will come

and say an idealist will come and say

the essence of what they mean is the

idea itself it's the idea itself so

when an idealist looks at this

anti-communist sentiment among the

truckers and they go huh the essential

reason that they are expressing

anti-communist sentiment is because they

are essentially anti-communists because

they are committed to the idea of

anti-communism but a materialist says

that the reason they harbor the idea of

anti-communism

isn't because of ideas but because of

what that refers to in material reality

for them now why have they come to

associate communism with the liberal

elite and the agenda of the ruling class

and the corporations and the status quo

and the mainstream media that's a

separate question and i would be free to

explain to you the reason for that but

before you even

try to

wrap your mind around the reason for why

they're anti-anti-communists

you have to first understand what they

mean by anti-communism you don't first

find the reason and then go oh is it a

valid reason or is an invalid reason

that's not what's important what's

important is what they mean what do they

mean by anti-communism you can take them

at at face value which is pretty

generous because you're operating under

the assumption that these people are

properly educated about what communism

is and that they actually know what

communism is so i'll give you this

example when these truckers holy fuck

mom bellow thank you so much brother

appreciate you so much thank you so much

when these people express anti-communist

sentiment

here is the question you have to ask as

a materialist

okay here's what you have to ask as a

materialist

are they in material reality actually

really referring to communism as a

historical phenomenon so like for

example when they're expressing

anti-communist views

is the object of their speech really the

material reality of communism around the

world well

we can actually kind of try and measure

that somehow or try to actually

investigate that we can look at for

example

the

character of the supporters of communism

in eastern europe and in russia and we

can actually look

at

communists in china and

when we do that

once you look past the superficial

ideology it's very strange how

communists appear very similar to these

anti-communists in russia for them

communism means pretty much the same

thing that anti-communism means for

these truckers which is a very curious

thing i mean in russia it's the

communists who are i've shut listen king

leak you're either a pussy who's gonna

get in my vc or you get the fuck out of

my chat because guess what i destroyed q

i'm gonna prove how i fucking destroyed

him if you think he won it's because

you're a fucking idiot not because he

actually won dumbass get in my fucking

vc if you want to be unbanned i don't

have time for pussies and if q wants to

fucking dunk on me he has to fucking

actually debate me like a man not hide

behind his fucking keyboard but

something tells me if that dude gets in

my vc he's gonna grovel at my feet

because he's gonna fucking be

intimidated by our chat okay i'm drawing

a line on this question hold the water

back actually so you don't like me if

you don't if you you you think i'm far

off on this

okay

and why don't you explain yourself too

i don't give a fuck if you think i'm far

off on this explain why on this specific

point about ideology so again are is the

real material object of their speech

really communism

or

does communism mean something for them

that's different from the real communism

i mean that's what you have to

understand because they're liberal

capitalists not communists and you are a

fucking idiot

there's literally so many points i have

to break down and you're literally on

point five right now shut the fuck up

because i'm on point two right now we're

gonna talk about the owner operator

thing in a second but you have to shut

your fucking mouth

and wait you're assuming i haven't

thought about this and i don't have a

response to it i do have a response to a

dumb fuck then why do they vote for the

people's party why are they

ideologically this in that way why don't

you listen why don't you listen to what

i'm saying dumbass it's so fucking

stupid ask what the essence is what is

the essential reason the materially

essential reason don't fucking look at

the surface and just say that's it go

deeper ask why if you're a materialist

you ask why fucking bums in my chat

can't even fucking do the minimum of

criticism you don't even have critical

thinking you think appearance and the

essence is the same thing it's not okay

so let's first ask the question what do

they mean by communism clearly what they

mean by communism is very different from

the actual reality of communism and why

is that well first and foremost the most

obvious explanation

or justification for what i'm saying is

the fact that communist states don't

have vaccine mandates china was against

forcing people to take the vaccines they

insisted it was voluntary the communist

party of the russian federation has come

out against vaccine mandates so

communist states are not forcing people

to take the vaccine i mean that is the

most simple reason for why they're not

actually referring to communism when

they're expressing anti-communist

sentiment they're referring to a straw

man of communism the reasons for why

they're doing that is a separate topic

and i would be happy to get into it but

you have to first establish they're not

actually talking about communism okay

now the second thing that they may be

referring to by communism is the

all-encompassing totalitarian whatever

social control of the people right where

there's no longer a social contract but

the just the state absolutely dominates

the individual with no back and forth

and no dialectic between the people in

the state and it's just the state

all-encompassing state forcing its will

on the people and not just the state but

corporations and big tech all just

instituting a form of total control of

the people leaving them no form of

sovereignty and no form of independent

economic life whatsoever okay

well we can actually investigate

historically whether that is true for

communist states now it is true that

this hericature of communism was what

trotsky had planned for the soviet union

just all encompassing state property but

it was actually stalin who insisted

that the state

does not own all property that not all

property is public property

and there's two forms of that the for

the collective farms were owned by the

collective not the state it was owned by

the collective so the state did not have

all-encompassing total control the other

thing was the small garden plots that

pretty much everyone was allowed to have

and there was other forms of independent

control and ownership almost everyone in

the soviet union had a dhaka in the

countryside that was theirs and they had

gardens there and they could sell the

produce in a way right and the same is

true for china so this association of

the historical experience of communism

with just all encompassing state

ownership of everything

doesn't reflect the reality

in today's china communism is

economically associated with the people

having some form of compound security

independent security whether that takes

this form of a small plot of land or the

ownership of single unit apartments that

they own right and also china you

obviously can own a business

on top of that and you can own you can

have your own businesses and whatever so

this is a when you actually study the

historical experience of communism you

will find

that

the

hold on

that the historical experience of

communism

you will discover that the historical

experience of communism

radically contrasts

with the idea of communism that these

people have in their head so if that's

true and that these people are genuinely

confused and have misunderstood what

communism actually was in history and

what it represented in its respective

countries the question you then have to

ask

is whether if actually shown

or adequately persuaded about what

communism was they would be sympathetic

to communism if they knew for example

what mao represented for the chinese

people the peasants the chinese peasants

against the liberal elites and the urban

elites and the same for stalin with the

russian peasant against the urban elites

of the soviet union i mean they would

probably be more sympathetic to stalin

and mao if they actually had a good idea

of what happened there the problem with

why they don't is that first of all the

cold war and nato and um ruling class

created education system in canada and

america has brainwashed its decades and

decades of brainwash

about communism so and the other thing

too is that china and russia are on the

other side of the fucking world so they

just don't have any idea of their

history and their specific experience so

we have to be just keep in mind what

they mean by communism what they mean by

communism is a straw man of communism a

propaganda version of communism that was

created by the ruling class

and it's almost as if once you are you

guys following me this is this too like

theoretically heavy because i feel like

this is so fucking simple right i feel

like it's always it's just so fucking

simple right okay

now then what you have to do is ask the

question it's uh

it's almost as if what canadian truckers

are actually saying is correct what

they're actually saying when you get to

the essence of the matter is they're

saying this all of the things you taught

me about communism you're doing now you

taught me to that communism was this bad

thing because um it's it's social

control and it's forcing people and it's

taking away our rights and our liberties

and our dignity and our human dignity

and all that kind of stuff and it's this

tyranny well you're doing that now so

that's the essence of their

anti-communism they are literally

telling the liberal elites that this new

form of capitalism is indistinguishable

from all the shit they would say about

communist states and actually many

marxists have pointed out that out in in

different words they said well it's

funny how all the things they warned us

about in communism are happening under

capitalism people don't own homes

anymore people don't have any control

over their lives anymore they have

nothing they're under the total

subordination and control of

corporations and and we were being

brainwashed and like 1984 wasn't what

happened in the soviet union it's what's

happening now right so at its essence

beyond the surface their anti-communism

is correct when you actually look at

what they're trying to refer to they're

right they're just not using the right

word instead of calling it communism but

but okay then then this the the third

thing you have to ask

is okay

i'm an educated communist and i can

clearly see that they're using the wrong

word they should not be calling it

communism or denouncing communism so how

do we approach that first and foremost

we have to patiently make it clear one

before anything

what practical utility a real communism

would have for them i mean you don't

don't just go and say you're wrong

actually you're wrong because that

doesn't matter actually give them a

reason to be sympathetic to communism

give them a reason to change their views

on communism by giving a new meaning to

communism so tell them and show them

that communism in canada means the

convoy communism in canada means the

working class banding together and

fighting the ruling class communism

means abandoning the illusions that some

of the self-proclaimed leaders of the

convoy who are duping people are

throwing on them communism means always

support the working class yes pepe

communism means yes we're against the

vaccine mandates the russian communists

are against it so why shouldn't we give

tell them that the russian communists

are against the vaccine mandates so are

we communism is better than the eclectic

ideologies they're adopting now because

communism will allow us to

scientifically understand

the forces behind all of these changes

and what it means for us and what the

key and the weapon see this is the

tragic truth the freedom convoy is

doomed i'm not gonna lie to you and tell

you it's not it's doomed just like every

other peasant uprising in history was

doomed it is doomed right but where

communists come in and step in is that

they say listen we have the keys to

overthrow this working class this ruling

class that you hate this great reset

agenda this tyranny of the liberal

elites we have the keys to overthrow

them and we should prove that to them we

should prove that to them it's our duty

to prove it to them that's the first

thing you do and then on top of that you

also patiently educate them education is

important patiently talk to them educate

them on how they got in it wrong and how

we've been lied to about communism in

russia and china and we've been lied to

about communist history and that in fact

communist history will show that we're

aligned with them and give them the meat

and potatoes communism doesn't mean

thank you chris morlock thank you chris

morlock communism doesn't mean we're

going to take your shit away and and

control you and you're not going to be

able to have your own trucks or your own

businesses or your own livelihood we're

going to aggregate you and force you to

be in a whatever it doesn't mean we're

going to make everyone equal and do all

this shit patiently explain to what

communism actually does mean and what

communism actually does mean is land

reform we're gonna

break monopolies and give you land to

start off on and that's what our common

social goal is that the people

right should have means of production

that's the goal of communism forgive

debt that's another thing that's and

that's what i'm going to get into which

i didn't on twitter but that's what

we're going to get into tonight is the

debt question which no one's paying

attention to when it comes to these

canadian truckers okay so you can see

if you have a problem with false

ideological consciousness among the

working class you don't use that as an

excuse to denounce the working class the

material substrate what you do is prove

the worth of these ideas prove it to

them that they should think of communism

differently that's your duty that's your

responsibility so this person did not

make an argument actually she did not

make an argument all she did was point

out um potentially that they have

ideological views she disagrees with but

she did not make an argument as to the

question of whether they are working

class or not right whether this is the

rank and file and the base of a

potential communist movement and despite

what she's trying to say about actual

communists there are no actual

communists in canada just like there are

no actual communists in america we don't

have a communist movement communism

basically means nothing in both of these

countries in both canada and america

communism is either a straw man of the

right or

it's a form of liberal edginess to the

extreme which is also based on the straw

man that right-wingers have created so

there's no real meaning to communism in

america and canada we have to import the

meaning we have to give sense to it in

an authentic way okay

but so this second prong so the first

prong that they're nazi's confederate

flag that's debunked the second prong

ideologically they're not communist or

they're anti-communist again that's just

idealism that has nothing to do with the

materialist view and some idiot was like

okay hans so are you saying that these

people are just gonna spontaneously

become communists no i'm not saying that

because that's where communists are

supposed to come in that's where you're

supposed to actually try and lead the

movement and prove your worth and giving

them that these ideas it's like it's so

simple that's literally what class

consciousness is supposed to be about if

they think all of this is in literature

from 150 years ago marx and engles

talked about it the social democrats

talked about it lenin talked about it

stalin and mao they did it's very simple

communists are the ones who are supposed

to give form to the content the content

is not going to spontaneously become

communist scientific socialism is not

ever going to arise spontaneously you

need an organ a spirit a head that

independently formulates this it's not

just gonna come from the ground what's

gonna come spontaneously is chaos and

yes other forms of socialism take a very

eclectic and yes oftentimes problematic

form i mean karl kotsky called

anti-semitism the socialism of fools why

because spontaneously anti-semitism

would become popular among the working

class um of course uh other forms of

reactionary socialism become popular

conspiracy theories are very big

although some of them are actually

correct right but yes some believe in

reptilian alien shapeshifters some

believe in um that communists control us

which actually has some grounding in

reality to be honest um some of them

believe in the illuminati again these

are all things that actually do have a

grain of truth to be honest but they

have all sorts of beliefs some of them

are free-market austrians right i mean

some of them i don't know they like

jordan peterson or they watch stephen

crowder i don't know i mean there's a

there's just chaos it's what it is it's

chaos and communists are not supposed to

denounce chaos but represent the logos

that arises out of the chaos as dugan

would put it communists represent the

logos that emerges from the chaos that

is what scientific socialism is it's not

just gonna be born uh spontaneously it's

going to be delivered by the wet nurse

the horror the substrate right the

ground the impenetrable depth of chaos

the horror

in platonic language the wet nurse will

deliver the horror sorry deliver the

logos with our assistance

communism is very simple yes

it's all very simple what i'm saying do

you follow me because i don't know why

this should ever be controversial i

don't know why there's a dispute about

it or a debate or a controversy i don't

know why anyone would ever

like

contest what about this is hard to

comprehend

i mean how can you not wrap your head

around this before we move to the debate

about the class nature of the truck

drivers is there anyone who can contest

what i just said you cannot judge a

phenomena based on ideology on the

surface you have to go to the essence of

things is there anyone who would ever

argue against that

before we move on because i feel like

this is like a set and i feel like this

is like set there's no way there's

nothing you can say what could you say

what could you say oh no ideology is

what matters okay then you're an

idealist you're not a marxist the only

thing you could possibly say is what q

tried to say

which was that it was not a working

class movement and that's what he was

trying to argument that's what's that's

what he was trying to argue and he's

wrong

but what he said requires more

theoretical explanation to respond to

okay you so there's no debate there's

absolutely nothing anyone could say

so far one no one can argue their nazis

no one can argue that that the swastika

was representative or the confederate

flag was represented too nobody could

say that the superficial anti-communist

sentiment that's being expressed among

the truckers indicates a radical

incompatibility between communists and

the truckers in terms of persuading them

right so the final argument which itself

is going to have many prongs to it is

going to be the question well are these

working class protesters at all in the

first place that is where

the guy q comes in so first you just see

my response basically what i just said

someone who confuses ideologies with

material reality and so on so q had to

step in because there's no defending her

argument so he had to bring a new one

which was

this

so this is where we find the confusion

and here is where you're gonna have to

bear with me and here is also where i'm

going to be introducing

um things that are not

universally accepted by marxists

just because it's a it's a it's a new

analysis right which you probably never

heard before so this is where

you're gonna have to bear with me

all right so

this is what he says the working class

is defined by sale of one's labor in

exchange for money so what would the

rest of us look like aligning with the

owners present at the protest while

truckers themselves are for the most

part not participating or even blocked

from re-entering canada by the convoy

so

we are met with a a thing right

so there's many things we have to

address here there's like a ton right

the first thing

um

concerns the

the property owning status of

the the the truck driver so there's a

word called owner operator in canada

it's called owner operator right and

owner operator there's a distinction so

some truck drivers are just

employees and they're hired by a company

to drive trucks but they don't own any

of the trucks right the second thing

is an owner operator who yes are more

disproportionately represented at these

protests there's no i have no doubt

about that

who basically own their own trucks

and get hired for freelance

by others to deliver goods with their

own trucks

and among a minority of those owner

operators

there are people who have been

successful enough

and wealthy enough

um

to buy more trucks and hire people and

shit and that's how some trucking

businesses

have arisen and it's very similar to to

peasants right some peasants

own land and just own the land

some are serfs who don't own any land

some are proletarians who are hired to

work on land

and some are successful enough to buy

more land hire more peasants and

effectively become landlords right so

there's a few myths we have to debunk

first of all

among the so-called owner operators

some owner operators are in worse

conditions than company truckers i'm

gonna yeah i'm getting into that very

few are successful most immigrants yes

i'm getting into it okay um

there's a confusion around this which q

in his dishonesty is not going to be

telling you about

which is that

for many a huge proportion i don't have

the exact statistics on me well if

someone has the statistics um

link them to me

for many of the so-called owner

operators

they actually do have employers

who forced them to file under the um

let me see what i was sent so i can just

give you the specific uh thing

so yeah

the truckers are are um

yes the the trucking companies

don't want to hire them as w-2 employees

so

and and give them benefits

so they set up llc's

and

like 99 of the truckers

that

own the business

only own it because the company tells

them to

or forces them to so they file their

llc's as independent business owners so

that the companies that they work for

don't have to give them benefits

and don't have to give them adequate

compensation

okay

but that's just the first point so the

majority of these so-called owner

operators

are employees who are forced to list as

llc's because employers don't want to

give them benefits

and also abide by labor regulations and

shit like that so that's very important

to keep in mind

okay

the second thing

which is where it's gonna get a little

more theoretically heavy well no another

thing people are saying well why don't

you see a

similar proportion of company drivers

joining in on the protests

it's actually very simple company

drivers have no leverage

they're more desperate

they have they have less independence

they can't afford to do things like this

every rebellion in history was started

not by the people who have

the most to lose but by people who do

have something to lose

and therefore have

the leverage to be able to revolt

that's just true for every rebellion in

the history of humanity

um

and that's how they start and those

people open the gates for the lesser

privilege to join in

so yeah of course

um operator owners are gonna have more

leverage and they're gonna be at the

front lines of this

because they can't be fired yeah company

drivers can get fired

some of them might not even be citizens

right so there's that now there's people

telling me oh haas then why are all

these people white why are they only

exclusively white okay that's your claim

that's what the media has told you

that's what you're hearing

and the question stands as to whether

that reflects the facts

so looking at the facts

um

we find people like this

send this message

so let's raise the volume

trudeau please tell him that we're

united it's just not a white supremacist

group we're not a small french minority

thank you

thank you

i don't see any nazi flags i mean you'd

think if this was a nazi movement

there'd at least be one i don't see any

of those okay so they're trying to tell

you it's a white supremacist movement

and that's clearly not the case there

are people from other backgrounds in the

movement too

um so yeah i mean

that's just not correct right

um so that argument's blown out of the

fucking water

okay finally about this thing about the

working class and selling its labor this

is this is the third thing we're gonna

have to get into

which is gonna be a little more

difficult to comprehend and follow with

me but you have to bear with me just

follow me here okay

because i have a lot of history to

unpack actually

so

this is an example of someone who

doesn't comprehend dialectics he

basically

thinks that concepts like the working

class are static and based on

definitions um that exist forever and

not once do you see in any of this q

guys tweets any attempt to again get to

the essence of things why has the

working class been defined what is the

deeper reason the working class being

associated with the sale of one's labor

is the essence of the working class the

definition of the sale of one's labor or

is there a deeper reason for the

historical association between the two

um and that's what i'm gonna set about

to explain now okay

thank you chris morlock and please bear

with me here right so historically i'm

going to give you a picture of the

emergence of capitalism in the 19th

century bear with me please on the one

hand you had the emergence of a rather

ineffective liberal laissez-faire state

this is the example of england so in

this liberal state here is where you

have interpolated all across europe also

by the way the basis of capitalism

actually so in capitalism you have

people who sell commodities and people

who sell the basis of commodities itself

which is labor but this reduction of um

and this tendency for society to um join

into either two camps right

owners and selling their labor right

this is actually something that takes as

its basis the universalism of the state

the universal liberal state so in older

forms of statehood you had various

castes and classes that were recognized

by the state but in a universal state

everyone is an equal citizen so when but

when everyone's an equal citizen you

still have class why because some people

are going to be selling things i mean

technically if everyone's an equal

citizen we are all capitalists in a

liberal state technically we're all

capitalists right we're all people who

have the right to have property and we

can sell things and and trade things and

buy things and we're not anchored down

by the old feudal obligations and and um

structures right we're just dwelling in

cities and we can just do whatever we

want we could sell what we want we're

free sovereign men right except and this

is where materialism comes in and

becomes relevant

things the things that we're selling and

buying for example

those have a basis and that basis is

human labor so a great many people are

going to find themselves in the awkward

situation of selling their labor i mean

how will things be made in a society

without someone making them you could

have a situation where there's a city

and everyone's kind of a capitalist and

you just have slaves make everything and

and we just trade the commodities that

slaves make maybe that's like ancient

athens or i don't know something like

that right or rome at some point

probably not right because rome had a

working class that's of its own

but you get the point like how does

private property even manifest and how

do we get the things that are being

traded and exchanged so in a bourgeois

liberal state you end up with an awkward

scenario where if we're not going to be

slaves and we are all going to be equal

citizens right and this equality is most

acute in these cities the formal

equality i mean where you're not going

to be weighed down by the

differentiations and landed propriet

property um there's going to be labor

itself will become a commodity if i'm

not a slave or a serf or even a peasant

and i'm a free citizen who's equal with

all other citizens i'm gonna end up

selling my labor as a commodity but the

paradox is that labor is the source of

all commodities itself so i'm selling

the source of commodities in the first

place

right so it's a mobius strip it's it's

out of this paradox that arises class

difference the bourgeoisie owned things

the proletariat

only owns their labor now how did that

come to pass why can't the proletariat

own some things no and i'll tell you why

because the process of creating this

universal state in which we are all

equal corresponded to flattening and

uprooting the traditional forms of ways

of life in the countryside so peasants

were uprooted from their land because

they had previously been tied to their

lands see peasants were not universal

equal citizens so to speak because they

were embedded in these traditional rural

relations that you know did not entail a

complete full equality at all they were

in they were like in the soil working

and attached to land and so on and so on

so when this order was disrupted and

they were uprooted whether that's

through indebtedness and that's

something i'm actually gonna get into

here they found themselves at the with

the short end of the stick they they had

nothing they had absolutely fucking

nothing so they migrated to the cities

to sell their labor which is the only

thing they had they were their land was

taken away and all they had was their

labor to sell right um and this is the

basis of liberal bourgeois equality so

it's a scam right oh we're all equal but

before we can be equal we're gonna take

away your human substance and you're

gonna have nothing to sell but your

labor and that's the the liberal

bourgeois quality of capitalism right

it's a scam some people already you know

can sell shit and and own property and

they're gonna be buying our labor right

now

does it end there no in 19th century

europe this capitalism this specific

sociological arrangement was actually

confined always to a minority of the

population when you moved over to the

countryside it turns out not everyone

was already proletarianized and not all

of the landlords had become capitalists

so and and these rule um relations were

actually impediments to the development

of the forces of production so the

productive forces were developing in the

cities and industry was rising and in

the countryside um you had stagnation

and decay and and an anchoring that was

just this impediment to the development

of capital and the forces of production

right so that is why there is such an

acute difference between the working

class and the peasants because the

peasants i mean what is a peasant right

a peasant when people say how can you

call the truckers peasants well

technically i can't because yes it is

true that peasants are people who work

in agriculture they're agricultural

peasants that's what a peasant means and

the reason peasants are agricultural is

because they are embedded in these old

traditional relations that have not been

subsumed by capital by the capitalist

mode of production yet right so in

europe you did have this acute

difference between feudalism and the

ancient regime and

capitalism which was this rapid

development of the forces of production

and modern whatever we call

modernization okay now bear that in mind

okay it's like i have to explain history

to these people because what this person

says it it doesn't make sense for

understanding class today i mean what

everyone who owns something is not the

working class so an electrician who owns

his toolbox is not the working class

uber drivers are not the working class i

mean these are just things we know

intuitively are wrong so we just have to

make sense with we have to make sense of

like what the problem is right because

there clearly is a problem it can't be

that this guy's right and that you know

the working class only have their labor

to sell it's just not true i mean the

working people own homes people own cars

they own plenty of means of production

today so why is that how did that come

to be and that's what i'm gonna be here

to set about to to explain to you okay

now it turns out it just so happens to

be what is the basis of this

universalization

of

the state because it kind of sounded

like i said that the state created the

bourgeoisie and the pes and the

proletariat no it's actually not true

the bourgeoisie that created the

universal liberal state in the first

place arose from the peasants now

historically there's all sorts of um

examples right so there's serps who

escaped and moved to cities and and

became capitalists but the main way in

which it happened like if we're looking

at the english civil war and all that

kind of stuff is that there were

peasants in the countryside small

holding peasants who had who were

successful and they had surpluses of

agricultural production and these

surpluses of agricultural production

they would use to invest like as a form

of capital and before you knew it they

no longer had to work on land they could

hire people and and it's from this basis

that you see the emergence of the

capitalist class right what does lenin

say about the origins of capitalism

lenin to paraphrase him he would say

capitalism is being reproduced every

minute every hour every minute every

second at the lowest levels

of the peasantry

are you guys aware of that quote from

lenin

and this was after the establishment of

the soviet union he said the capitalist

mode of production is being reproduced

every

day

every hour every minute every second at

the lowest level of the peasantry why

did lenin say that because the basis of

capitalism and modernity is always being

reproduced there's something i want to

introduce you guys to and they're called

k waves they're called contra devs i

forget how to pronounce them cycles

capitalist crisis is not one thing that

happens that just leads to socialism

capitalism and its development

correspond to constant revolutions in

the forces of production constant

sociological revolutions of the

emergence of new capitalist classes and

new proletarianizations all

corresponding to revolutions in the mode

of production these are k waves that you

can see it throughout history capitalist

crisis resolves itself because of these

revolutions

in the forces of production which offset

the falling rate of profit this is why

capitalism

has

survived for as long as it has i mean

marxists have never been able to explain

that i just explained it to you i don't

want to have a detour but this is

related interestingly enough the paradox

of capitalism's endurance is that across

all of these pay waves and revolutions

in the forces of production that are the

lifeline of capitalism we witness an

increasing level of socialization and an

increasing level

of the decline of profit as the actual

anchoring point of the economy it's

almost like capitalism through its

development is slowly turning into

socialism and with the emergence of

china today and china's is a socialist

country with a socialist mode of

production it's almost like

we are entering a socialist mode of

production or even already have

and that's what all the hubbub is about

when it comes to the great reset and the

fourth industrial revolution

the

the profit rate don't get it confused

the pro

fuck the profit rate across history in

the long term has actually declined but

the machine

of capitalism is propelled

because of the state because of debt

and because of increasingly

non-capitalist forms

of production companies operating at a

loss that are in debt etc etc etc that's

something to keep in mind because this

is a very important piece of the puzzle

we're going to be talking about if

capitalism is constantly being

reproduced

from its opposite which is supposedly

feudalism and its relics like the

peasantry as lenin said that means

capitalism never conquered feudalism

marx in capital volume 3 was confronted

with the enigma the paradox of landed

property and how its endurance is

proving to be um a kind of obstacle for

the development of the forces of

production and for capital right the

form of capitalist property capital and

landed property are

possess a contradictory relationship

toward one another

okay so you have this distinction right

now let's fast forward a little bit

during the capitalist crisis of 1929 um

you saw a breakdown of capitalism as a

whole right i mean other things were

going on namely

um as a predecessor actually i should

talk about that i shouldn't fast forward

too fast something interesting was going

on in the countryside the way in which

the countryside was becoming

subordinated to the capitalist mode of

production was principally through the

mechanism of debt so peasant proprietors

were becoming separated from their means

of production through debt through

indebtedness

they were being forced to buy their land

from landowners and landlords the land

that they had historically worked on and

they were working their land to pay off

debts now what happens with debt it's

always what happens with debt um you end

up not being able to pay off your debt

through your property so what do you do

you sell your property so peasants were

just starting to sell their land and

mass and migrate to these cities because

they were in debt to creditors who were

parasitically sucking their you know

sucking their life essence from them

right sucking them dry now keep that in

mind

debt as a driving force for transforming

uh the

relations of production of feudalism and

the ancient regime meanwhile

capitalists

not specifically only capitalists but

banks right i mean financial capitals

monopolists but specifically financial

capitalists were starting to buy up land

because of this they were starting to

come into um possession of vast vast

swaths of land and land actually became

a way of um a form of security for um

issuing loans

that was the case in italy where the

actual landlords were absentee landlords

but they would use their land as a form

of leverage as a form of security in

order to like give loans and they'd

become the basis for banking right in

any case these static feudal mode of

production was starting to be put to

work

in service of the development of the

forces of production specifically though

in the service of capital you had a very

paradoxical thing and lenin would talk

about it in imperialism marx was talking

about it in capital volume 3 where it's

not just that the capitalist mode of

production and the pursuit of profit

became dominant debt and banks

specifically would acquire a new role of

almost replacing the feudal landlords

and the feudal um aristocracy in a sense

of representing the conditions of the

reproduction of capital itself in order

to make in order to be a capitalist for

example i have to take certain premises

for granted the first one is actually

land ground rent so as a capitalist i

don't just i don't actually own all my

means of production i have to pay rent

ground rent to um land owners and

private land holders um

in order to uh in order to uh in order

for my means of production to to work to

have means of production right my

factory is on top of land i do not own

that's a capitalist okay so phenomena

like georgism

and marx's time would emerge which

actually wanted to have the state own

all land specifically to eliminate the

parasitical role of the few the feudal

landlord and the capitalist and that the

issue of ground rent was the entire

marx called it the the final panacea of

the bourgeoisie with which to resolve

all social contradictions they were

blaming the landlord right which had a

grain of truth to it right um in any

case through imperialism and increased

financialization um

land starts to turn into real estate

right and specifically becomes a

financial asset it no longer becomes

like a static form of property just

owned by a feudal lord it becomes a

liquid financial asset that is now

integrated into the capitalist mode of

production but

and this is a very important

thing you have to keep in mind this

fundamental material basis of the

universality out of which arises

capitalist relations was constantly

reproducing itself and it never was

something you could just take for

granted whether under the feudal

landlord or the financial monopolist the

banker the monopolist uh the financial

capitalist the rentier parasite

eternities something that's static like

land for real estate right it's static

things that are not part of the

linear

motion that are not a function of time

for capitalism but are a function of

space endure so capitalism is marked by

temporal relations which have to do with

capital invest make money profit that's

time right and labor respectively i sell

my labor i get a wage wage is measured

how through time so there's a temporal

aspect of capitalism but also the

spatial aspect which used to be um

dominated by feudal relations just

reproduces itself in a new way so many

marxists have this misunderstanding that

in capitalism time just replaces space

no the eternal spatial relations just

take on a new form so it is in this way

that the ancient regime and feudalism

reproduces itself in a new way a new

type of peasantry arises a new type of

land owner arises a new type of landlord

new type of aristocracy new type of

these static fixed relations of

production that we associate with

feudalism re-emerges in a new way and

this is perfectly dialectical the future

never becomes fully reconciled by the

past as much as the future accelerates i

mean this is what this is my argument

against the landy and accelerationist

this is what i told them and not told

them but this is how i responded to them

i said you are accelerationist you don't

understand that for as much as there is

an acceleration there is a deepening of

the past there's a deepening of eternity

and that's where dugan comes in dugan is

the past eternal past nick land and the

accelerationists are the eternal future

infrared my

understanding of marxism in the 21st

century

is reconciling both of them as part of

the same thing right fres and this is

what dugan he calls it rko modernity the

more we accelerate into the future the

more the wealth and depth of the past

reveals itself there's things about the

past we didn't know the past has things

in it we haven't conquered right so the

more capitalist modernity triumphs the

more the depth of feudalism and

everything we associate with

pre-modernity reveals itself in a new

and deeper way and i don't really have a

lot of time to talk about this but this

is what corresponds to um the uneven

combined and uneven development of

capitalism not even in europe but

elsewhere like for example foreign modes

of production the russians right russian

empire was backward right the more

capitalism triumph in europe the more it

was confronted with backward russia the

more modernity triumph in russia and

europe it was confronted with backward

china now it's the backward islamic

world and it it keeps going into the

past basically it keeps going the past

is never fully conquered it's just

capitalism increasingly exists alongside

increasingly antiquated forms of modes

of production all existing

simultaneously right with socials china

tolerate these truckers these truckers

would have no reason to exist in social

china

continuing

off of what i was saying something

specifically happened

after the crash of 1929

by this point

most people were proletarianized but you

also did have a sizeable peasant class

but you had a a widespread pricing

crisis facing entire countries and

nations widespread unemployment

widespread admiseration widespread

populism so what happened

a new social contract was formed between

the state

imperialist state i should add

and the people and the working class the

state was not only going to adjust

itself to the increased level of

socialization it was going to initiate

this form of socialization specifically

by adopting policies that were social in

nature the state was no longer the

laissez-faire liberal state which had a

hands-off approach but a state that was

now concerned with how are people gonna

make their livelihood how are people

gonna have their bread right so the

state increasingly

led a attempt to revive the economies

through kind of socialistic measures um

taking on economic policies it's going

to give people loans for houses and land

and it's going to establish jobs

programs and suddenly the ability for

people to have a livelihood is something

that's going to be considered

relevant to politics and to the state

and

and through the state corporations and

all of their regulations and so on and

so on now the specific form that took

was specifically um giving and now this

security of the state of giving ensuring

people have the minimal of livelihood

which is actually now a political

concern actually does take the form of

discrete forms of property these precise

policies were what allowed people to own

homes and own cars and own a lot of

other things but the form of ownership

is not capitalist in the traditional

liberal sense because these are forms of

ownership given and guaranteed not only

by the state but the state and the

corporations and the facilitation of

capital through industrial modernity

itself now whereas the liberal form of

ownership is just this static i own it

and i can do whatever i want with it

these forms of ownership were

facilitated cars are the best example

because they're mobile we don't just own

cars like we own land we own cars

because they facilitate production so

these are facilitative compound forms of

labor given to the working class which

represent its form of security of an

increasingly socialized state

distinction is very crucial it's a

compound form of property not a static

form of property which means it's a it

compounds the labor of the working class

into a functional form of property this

is not a form of property that's just

being sold by a money grubbing

capitalist in an impartial distance way

what it is please bear with me guys is a

mecca suit the car the home the toolbox

that the electrician owns whatever these

are mecca suits of the working class the

working class owns a mecca an

exoskeleton suit with which it uses as a

compound to compound its own labor it

uses the mecha suit as the new substrate

from which it sells its labor only atop

this substrate that sells its labor in

today's economy you can't sell your

labor without a mecha suit so you need

that mecha suit right and that mecha

suit facilitates and reproduce produces

the very conditions of the universal

sale of labor we only have the

traditional capitalist arrangement of

you a capitalist who owns commodities

and me a laborer who only has their

labor to sell on top of a substrate that

reproduces the very conditions of the

universal state and what these mecha

suits do is precisely that and how do

they do it one by ensuring a minimum of

social order the population is satisfied

enough to not you know um be unemployed

and desperate and starving and

completely emirated and by the way

capitalism and and markets won't even

function if that's the if everyone's

just poor as shit there's going to be no

development of the forces of production

and it's a function of politics your

country's going to be weaker to other

countries and geopolitically it's going

to be a problem so there's that um

there's also the fact that

it's an it's necessary to reproduce the

very conditions of labor because the

technological forces of production have

accelerated to such an extent that labor

requires more not only more skill but

more property like can you really be a

laborer in today's economy without a

smartphone of course you can't right so

these are necessary to facilitate

production in the first place now only

when you take all of these things for

granted can i just sell my labor that is

where labor the extraction of labor

value i should say is going to begin

only atop that substrate so

it's almost as if and i want to paint a

picture for you in your head land

agricultural land specifically was

converted into this highway of gears

facilitating the movement of capital and

the capitalist mode of production and

the development of the forces of

production and instead of owning static

pieces of land you begin to own parts of

the gears in this machine but the

difference is that these are gears in a

machine that are facilitative and which

are moving and that facilitativeness

also reflects in the fact that these are

not unconditional forms of property with

which you just do whatever you want

they're subject to government

regulations the government regulates how

and in what way you can use them so all

of this comes together now the reason

why you were able to have these federal

regulations of property though was

because there was a deal people were

given property in the first place with

which to make a living through a host of

combined policies of course and then the

government's gonna regulate how and

where they can be used because

it helps us overall it's good that we

have traffic laws i mean it's good that

you know we can't just drive our cars in

whatever fucking way we want to that

helps us drive on the road right so the

working class as a whole is defined by

having a compound form

of property but it is not property in

the liberal capitalist sense because a

it's a facilitative form of property

that facilitates the mode of production

and the forces of production b it's not

a form of property with which they can

distance themselves from and abstract

themselves from because it's their mecha

suit which compounds their labor so

what is the definition of a compound

form of property ladies and gentlemen it

is a form of property that compounds

one's labor that's what compound form of

property means i just made up that

phrase by the way

it's a mecha suit right and you need the

mecha suit to be a laborer okay

so

now we're getting to these operator

owners right it's almost as if after the

new deal and after these reforms and

these changes in the forces of

production that happened the proletariat

fused with the peasantry now on the one

hand it was still the proletariat that

was selling its labor

but on the other hand like the peasantry

it possessed some form of security uh in

the form of a kind of property that

guaranteed it a minimum of subsistence

right and not only that but it

represented the material reproduction of

the polity now when i discovered this

actually i was confronted with the

paradox of the working class so i

studied this and i kept going into the

past and i realized this is actually

true even for liberal capitalism there

was never a pure proletariat in history

before the compound form of labor was

the plot of land so the only thing that

changed was a revolution in the forces

of production that decentralized

agriculture and then i discovered that

it wasn't just during the 1930s that the

state embarked on this kind of

proverbial land reform where it gave the

population some kind of security i came

to learn that every single revolution in

the history of humanity seemed to have

been about land or some equivalent to it

and that every state to secure a basis

in the population and to secure the

loyalty of the population principally

did this in the form of allotting and

redistributing land and that actually

this was the basis for feudalism because

in feudalism how did lords and nobles

and knights emerge because kings were

giving people land i mean this was true

this is true for every moment in human

history it's one of the only things that

are universal across all history the

entirety of civilization i don't care

where you go go to the incas go to the

aztecs go to the egyptians i mean go to

go to greece go to ancient rome it was

all about this dialectic of the state

and its material foundation in the

people specifically in the form of this

security this minimum of a security or

some kind of means of subsistence so

this is where dugan enters here and it's

like it's something eternal this is

where like something that is

fundamentally eternal enters

and the class struggle described by marx

between the proletariat and and the

bourgeoisie is just a footnote in this

more ancient and eternal phenomena of

um the significance of land for the

polity right capitalist modernity only

differs from ancient times because here

we are dealing with a mode of production

of the constant revolutionizing of the

forces of production the difference

between capitalism and these ancient

societies that capitalism is a mode of

production constantly in motion right

it's constantly about developing forces

of production new technologies building

new things um increase these are all the

things marx described all that is solid

melts into air but this more fundamental

um structure of human societies and

polities survived that for the peasants

got replaced so in the same way listen

let me tell you the difference between

capitalism and feudalism is the same

thing as the difference between a plot

of land and a truck a plot of land is

static and does not entail any

facilitative development of the forces

or production a truck meanwhile it's

like perfect poetry a truck has fucking

wheels it has fucking wheels not only

does it have wheels it entails a certain

level of socialization because it can

only drive on highways highways that are

created in common often times by the

state and by the government right so

it's like this beautiful poetic analogy

but the mistake marxist made was that

they assumed that this more fundamental

material antecedence out of which

capitalism emerges is eliminated with

feudalism and that's not true even after

you get rid of feudalism are more

fundamental human antecedents and

human eternity right somehow survives

that and actually it was lenin who had

first discovered this lenin had first

discovered this in the form of

recognizing the significance of the

democratic petty bourgeoisie or the

peasants lenin told them the mensheviks

were were linear temporalis so they they

had this stupid view

that oh feudalism is disappearing so we

should align with the progressive

liberal bourgeoisie in the cities who

are newer and that's the ally of the

proletariat lenin said no lenin had a

more dialectical view of history for

lenin history doesn't move as a linear

thing it's a zigzag it goes here and it

goes back and it goes forward and goes

back in zigzags right so the way lenin

was thinking was that he said no this

bourgeoisie in the cities looks like

it's brand new but for that precise

reason the owl of minerva has taken

flight it's too late look to the basis

the essential basis of that class look

to where they had emerged from afresh

the living basis of this class and that

is in the countryside it is the

countryside that gave birth to this city

buzwaze when he told the men's faces he

said that city bourgeoisie you're

looking at they already got rich right

there they're done they already are

dependent on the czar and they're

dependent on the the landowners and they

made it already if you want to go to the

essence of what makes this class

progressive and revolutionary go to

their actual material essential basis

which was from the countryside look at

the aspiring bourgeoisie in the

countryside look to the horror of which

was born the appearance that was lenin's

materialist brilliance right and even

after the victory of the the the um the

revolution lenin said the basis of

capitalism is always being reproduced

every minute every second every day

every hour at the lowest levels of the

peasant lenin recognized that

modernity's attempt to conquer its

premises was a foolhardy task dialectics

means we be reconciled with our premises

not just the phallic masculine logos but

also the sophia we came from a mother we

came from the sophia the ruling class

fantasy has always been to replace the

sophia with logos and

this is a foolhearty task you can't

replace your mother doesn't matter how

much you hate her she's there that's

where you came from that's where

everyone comes from as a mother you

can't replace that there's no way to

conquer that or replace that you have to

make peace with it that this is a

fundamental part of our humanity so if a

misogynist can do that with his hatred

of women women we must do that with our

hatred of the past out of which our

world had emerged our capitalist uh

so-called capitalist modern world had

emerged now with everything i just told

you with everything i had just told you

that there is two aspects that the the

this thing lenin was discovering it

wasn't just because of feudalism even

after feudalism's gone this dialectic

remains and it remains today precisely

in the form of the small holding subject

of the

canadian and american state who was

given a security a compound form of

property as the basis of selling labor

right what is the great reset what is

the fourth industrial revolution and

this is what i'm gonna set about to

explain now this is where the trucker

this is where this whole convoy comes

from this whole controversy comes from

this

there is a revolution in the forces of

production upon us there is it's a

revolution of the forces of production

in which people are going to lose their

means of livelihood they're going to be

separated from their means of production

and they're going to be proletarianized

as all revolutions in the forces

production have had it but our sick

slimy ruling class has learned its

lesson from the new deal and they said

after that new deal we gave the people

way too much power they had too much of

leverage they had too much of a voice

how do we maximize our power amidst this

fourth industrial revolution and

absolutely crush and make sure the

people will be at our mercy how do we

avoid for example they're materialists

they say during the 1929 revolution in

the forces of production people became

unemployed there was social instability

how do we curb social instability how do

we make sure people have enough to

survive and take care of that while

being able to survive this revolution in

the forces of production to secure our

profits because last time we had to give

the people something we had to give them

a piece of the pie we don't want to have

to do that again because we can't afford

to because if we do that it's game over

for us the ruling class we're going to

be replaced by better capitalists i mean

that's kind of what elon musk represents

to most people isn't it he represents a

new type of capitalist that's going to

replace the old one so they're scared of

this they're scared of this so they

devised and this is their plan that they

got at davos and it's what they're

thinking about is this great reset where

in contrast to the crash of 1929 it's

not going to be chaos people are not

going to be like unemployed and there's

going to be social unrest because hey

they're going to fuel funding for police

they're going to militarize the police

they're going to increase surveillance

they're going to have they're gonna use

this data economy to monitor us in every

possible fucking way so all that social

unrest that they had to fear in the

1930s that's taken care of just by pure

force right the might of force i haven't

even explained the data economy and in

its significance and it's not just a

tool of control it's more

it's uh

economic analysis right yeah they're

going to use uh january 6th as their

predecessor to even clamp down more on

our civil liberties then they are going

to give us something

we're just not going to own any of it

the people are not going to have any say

in it we're going to have a pod we're

going to eat bugs we're going to have

we're going to own nothing at all and

we're going to work for these

corporations and these corporations are

going to have total control over us if

we don't do what they say we get fired

and maybe if we get fired we'll get a

universal basic income and we'll just

sit in our pods and survive we'll become

like the people in the fucking matrix

that is what they have planned for us

that is what the ruling class which did

survive our ruling class did survive

1929 they survived the last capitalist

crisis they survived 73 they survived

that capitalist crisis so they're like a

cockroach they've survived too long and

this is their final plan to make it out

of the fourth industrial revolution

pacify the population completely

subordinate them tear away any of their

means of resistance and ensure their

survivability while making sure they

have no security and no leverage

themselves so they have to fully trust

us they don't have to earn our trust by

us giving them something so they have

the minimum of independence we're gonna

fully subordinate them to us they're

gonna be fully dependent on us this is

their plan this is their plan this has

been their plan they have waged the war

against small businesses precisely

because of this because they don't

control the small businesses you think

it's about the petite bourgeoisie or

something like that the petite

bourgeoisie in the class has been

outmoded what is a petite bourgeoisie

there is a big monopoly bourgeoisie and

there are those who have a compound form

of labor there's no independent petite

bouzouzzi in a stain of age now some of

these small business owners become rich

but the ones that do become rich they

always hit a ceiling and that ceiling is

the establishment i mean why do you

think elon musk is against the status

quo because even he hit a ceiling he

knows that he's never going to have the

influence and the power that all these

infl insiders are who are in bed with

the government elon musk isn't part of

their club he's the outsider donald

trump got kicked out of their club and

that's why he did what he did right

yeah the the today's pete petit bouzous

are professional managerials right so

you gotta understand this that's what

they have planned

okay now they're gonna keep this machine

they're gonna keep their profits

churning at our expense we're gonna

maintain their power at our expense and

it's not just their power it's the power

of our establishment the entrenched

politicians our fucking mainstream media

our corporations they all don't want to

let go our fourth industrial revolution

would completely outmode them shouldn't

the internet have fucking blown cnn out

of the water it didn't they survive like

cockroaches and they want to continue to

survive and that's why they're doing

this great reset shit because in order

to survive they have to put the people

down in order to survive they have to

put us in pods just like in the matrix

we have to be their battery because the

way it works now is that there is a

revolution in the forces of production

at hand the old way can't keep going it

cannot continue as before that's true

that's where we draw a line and disagree

with the reactionaries we have to tell

the reactionaries and the working class

listen the old way cannot continue that

much is correct but where communists are

gonna must step in is this what we will

tell them as all previous revolutions in

the forces of production

you need some land we are gonna fight

for you to take some left because yes

your old way of life can't adjust to

this new economy but you're still a

human being you're still a man you still

have dignity so as communist the whole

point of communism that's why it's

associated with equality and all that

shit the whole point of communism is

because we want people to be able to

survive this great reset this fourth

industrial revolution and have something

have something that will maintain some

independence allow you to be a dignified

human being not be dependent on these

corporations in this government and

actually make it yourself let the people

breathe that's what china did that's

what russia did they gave the people

something so the people could be

themselves so they could flourish and

they could thrive we're not committed to

helping this establishment and this

fucking parasitical ruling class you

should flourish you should have wealth

you should thrive may the best man win

right the most talented the most skilled

the best artists the best um even the

best entrepreneurs whatever let's let's

let's actually have a people's great

reset where the monopolies in the ruling

class don't have the power they do

anymore and everyone starts on a fresh

basis equal opportunity that's what

communism means the reason it needs to

be communism is because communists

critique the existing forms of private

property which means communists are able

to circumvent the special privileges the

ruling class has in the name of the

sacred right of private property and

use it to the advantage of the people

give the people something allow the

people to own something and it's not

just one thing it's a relationship right

the government needs to have a

relationship with the people but it has

to build trust in order to build trust

you have to give the people something so

they're not fully dependent on you so

they're not fully a slave to you and

fully at your mercy right and from there

yes there's probably going to have to be

new regulations and new ways we maneuver

that and get around that but we'll focus

on that in the future for now the people

we need to earn i mean we communists

need to earn their trust the government

a new government a people's government

has to earn their trust i mean that's

how china works that's the that's the

bread and butter of the chinese system

it's not full government unconditional

control it's a social contract between

the people and the government government

makes sure people have a minimum of

independent livelihood like land or a

plot a

single unit apartment that they own so

that the people can have a fresh base

with which to flourish and the

monopolies don't get to implement

satanic evil agendas like the great

reset where they put us in fucking pods

and fully suck our life force dry and

enslave us

okay so it's important to rethink what

communism is communism is about changing

the economy only because things like

this happen capitalism does give rise to

monopolies and changes in the forces of

production and you do need communism to

be able to navigate those waters because

if we're just free market la ze fair

capitalists one we're not going to

address to the special needs of the new

economy in any kind of way two we're not

going to be able to challenge the power

of the monopolists and people who who

are implementing the great reset because

they're just going to say this is our

free market in order to have a real free

market we need a communist intervention

in this economy to break their power

that's the case for communism i make to

people like the truckers and to the

working class and so far

they have an ear even the people not

fully convinced change their view about

what communism is and to me that's more

of an accomplishment than anything else

right at least i mean you're not gonna

convince people immediately but at least

you're gonna give them something to

think about right and that's the bare

minimum of what we need right now okay

that's the bare minimum of what we need

right now okay now let me tell you

finally what the vaccine mandates

represent to these truckers and why

they're resisting the vaccine mandates

it's not because they're brainwashed or

they're irresponsible or they're evil or

they're stupid or whatever the fuck

these people are trying to say these

leftists it's for a very simple reason

the vaccine mandates represent a new

type of socialization and regulation of

the economy by the government in tandem

with the fourth industrial revolution

i'll explain the connection soon don't

worry about that without the securities

so imagine after that you know after the

new deal how powerful the federal

government got it got very powerful why

did the people tolerate that because the

people also had something that they

could rely on and be independent in

regards so the people tolerated all

these new regulations yeah the

government you can regulate our roads

you can regulate

all this shit because we get it right

we're all interdependent we need a way

to like work together we need this to

work we you know we all need the same

highway to get to work and back and and

go where we're going so yeah we need all

these regulations to to live

right the fourth industrial revolution

is also demanding a lot of new

regulations right but the people are

being regulated like these vaccine

mandates

without being given any interest without

being given any piece of the pie of the

new fourth industrial revolution so it's

like they it's almost as if imagine if

all those new deal regulations happened

without people being able to have cars

in the first place and people being able

to have homes in the first place they're

just imposing all this tyranny on us and

we have no say in it and no part in it

what's in it for them nothing now people

are saying well it's because of the

pandemic give me a fucking break there's

been pandemics in human history before

it's not just because of kovid it's

clearly a stand-in i mean this fourth

industrial revolution was gonna fucking

happen with or without covet it's that

kovid coincidentally seemed to have

accelerated it at the right place in the

right time now why do the vaccine

mandates

represent um the new data economy and

the fourth industrial revolution i'll

tell you why because i'll explain it

like this the internet social media the

so-called metaverse right has

fundamentally encompassed the whole of

our lives total whole of our lives

yet the framework with which um this has

happened has still been on the basis of

the voluntary liberties and rights

bestowed to us by the democratic state

so for example i can opt out of this

shit you know um it's fundamentally

transformed our lives i still have the

liberty to throw this phone in a lake

and go live in the woods or something

and opt out right i don't have to

be a part of it

i still have my rights and my liberties

right this is just the thing a layer on

top of that it's all it is it's just a

layer on top yeah cuba has no vaccine

mandates but a very high vaccination

rate because of a specific relation

being a state and it's people exactly

right

um

i don't have to be a part of this right

so i want you to think of it like in

death stranding that game the the cairo

you know there's this on there's uh

there's there's the in-depth stranding

basically there's this invisible realm

it's called the cairo

it's called chirality so everything in

death stranding like you turn on a

certain you have a certain equipment

that allows you to see it but like

there's these like ghosts these like

these black dust particles or some shit

that represent like this invisible force

here right between all of us well that

invisible force is the metaverse it's

the internet it's the social media right

so it's here right but the government

has not caught up to the revolution in

the forces of production the base has

changed the superstructure has not yet

adjusted to it and one of the ways this

superstructure is adjusting to it is by

instituting all-encompassing forms of

regulation and control that are

inescapable just like social media is in

a stable it's just not formally so right

so vaccine mandates basically represent

this

for people vaccine mandates represent

the government being able to exercise

total regulation and control the

question is on what basis so for example

what the truckers are saying is i'm in

my fucking truck oftentimes i own this

truck and i'm going to talk about that

ownership thing in a second and the

government's coming and telling me i

have to take a fucking vaccine why i

earned this truck i had to work for it i

work my fucking job what right do you

have to tell me i need to take a fucking

vaccine who are you you're not in my

business you're not in my industry well

it's clear the vaccine mandate

represents a forced form of

socialization it's forcing these

truckers to be a part of a sociality

they don't want to be well it's not just

that they don't want to be but it's

forcing them to be a part of a sociality

without giving them the basis for which

that sociality benefits them

economically so it's like they're being

they're it's a forced form of

socialization they'll say oh you have to

take the van vaccine mandates for the

benefit of us all who the fuck is us all

right i'm a trucker driving my fucking

truck making a living i'm not you know

what i mean i'm not part of you i make

my bread this way i don't make bread

with you we don't make bread in a social

way i have to sit in my fucking truck

and make it myself you're gonna force

this fucking mandate on me right so the

government's sticking its nose somewhere

without paying for it you understand

it's sticking its nose somewhere without

paying for it the way the government

could pay for that potentially is um

give the truckers something right or uh

prepare them for this new fourth indus

revolution and have a new relationship

between the government and the people

they might be more inclined to take that

vaccine they might be more inclined to

feel like they're part of this bigger

social community where we have to have

public health and care about our common

health and whatever right

so that's how you would do it that's how

communist states have done it right

because they have the trust of the

people right

when many people don't want their

products handled by non-vax truckers

then don't pay for non-vex truckers it's

just fucking stupid like you're a

trucker you never signed up for this

metaverse shit where we're all part of

this virtual world where you can impose

these these mandates and shit so you

have to understand the mandates are a

stand-in for socialization and that

socialization specifically corresponds

to the fourth industrial revolution so

it's almost a form of false

consciousness they're rejecting the

mandates

because the mandates represent the

fourth industrial revolution it

represents the government increasingly

adjusting itself to this fourth

industrial revolution without having any

mandates from the people the government

is devoid of a mandate from the people

you need a mandate from the people in

order to fundamentally transform and

embark upon this new socialization and

and control they don't have a mandate

from the people and yet they're trying

to force a vaccine mandate upon the

people

so this is very important to keep in

mind you understand now what this is

about it's much more than just vaccine

mandates and and by the way vaccine

mandates lockdowns 5g are all part of

the same fucking thing thank you nobody

appreciate you thank you for the five

goofy sucks a lot of leftists losing

around why are people against 5g why are

people against vaccines because you

don't have a class analysis these are

all part of literally the same thing it

is about a forced form of socialization

where you have to opt into this new

metaverse and this new

increasing level of socialization and

you know i have to preface the words i'm

using because they may not be entirely

clear to everyone increased levels of

socialization correspond to government's

ability to institute regulations and

policies

that affect people more directly more

proximately and more

in terms of scale in a more widespread

fashion the government has like more

power to regulate aspects of our lives

when our lives become so closely

intertwined to an extent that we're

socialized right so this specific form

of intertwinement of our lives i mean

you could say oh there's always been

viruses and this would apply to any

other moment in history and it just

wouldn't right because again this change

was happening before coronavirus

coronavirus

has merely accelerated it

and it's a form of opting us in

to this data economy to this new

metaverse whatever the fuck you want to

call it right

do i think 5g suppose i don't know

anything about 5g all i would say is

that

the reasons people oppose it are not

actually because of the health concerns

that's what they say but look at the

class

look have a materialist analysis of

things right okay

now

it's like that's very important right

now um

what you have to understand when it

comes to that vaccine mandate is there's

a lot of ways that it's related to the

fourth industrial revolution and the

data economy the first way is that it's

a form of data a vaccine mandate forces

you to have proof of vaccination and

soon that becomes a registry of like can

you enter this business prove that

you're vaccinated now the pandemic may

end and the proof of vaccination may

disappear but the more fundamental way

of this kind of state inscription of are

you excluded or are you included is

going to remain this more fundamental

way of regulating people's status in

order for them to participate in the

economy is going to be applied to other

things too not just their status as it

pertains to the virus and vaccination

that's part of the metaverse and

the data economy and the fourth

industrial revolution right it's all

part of that smart cities going to

increasingly regulate people's behavior

people's um

statuses through surveillance

in order to better optimize businesses

to address people's wants to address

people's needs and to know what kind of

people they're dealing with in the first

place oh you're a criminal you can't

enter this bar oh your face reflects uh

um

a heightened mood of anger and

aggressiveness you're not going to be

like these small things optimize and

make businesses and make the process of

extracting money from consumers more

efficient right i have detected a change

in your mood i mean that's what the data

economy is about the data economy is

using ai

in order to optimize

the forces of production around what

consumers demand right oh your mood is

sad would can i may i alexa i will

recommend you uh

a fucking flashlight i don't fucking

know right it that's that's what it's

about right

so the vaccine mandates are a way to

like make that real not just from your

smartphone but just when it comes to

business it's forms of fortification and

inscription of the population in general

right we've never had that before like

when have we ever had this thing where

it's like oh yeah in order to enter the

walmart you're gonna have to have a

proof

that proves you're included and excluded

let me tell you some other scary

implications that vaccine mandates are

setting us up for so we used to just be

citizens where we could just breathe as

citizens i'm a citizen you're a citizen

i can walk with my nuts hanging and go

to walmart the rights the democratic

rights entailed to us by citizenship are

going to be stripped away soon we're

going to have other forms of regulations

like for example can you enter this

walmart what is your workplace status

how many funds do you have what is your

standing with uh the court i mean that's

why people raise the fuss about china's

social credit system because that's what

they see it as it's like you have a

social credit system and it's gonna

determine what your freedom of movement

and your freedom of purchase but what

people don't understand is that china's

social credit system is is a grassroots

thing and it specifically applies

businesses and not individuals it

doesn't you know and it's specifically

about promoting good behavior right like

don't litter and don't be a slob and

shit it's not meant to enforce political

loyalty or political correctness but it

is gonna become like that in the west

and in america and in canada right um

so we're gonna actually have you know

the thing that they're saying the social

credit system in china it's not actually

how it works in china but we are gonna

get that here in the way that they're

just like this the boogeyman of the

social credit system we're getting that

here right they don't have that in china

but we're getting the thing we accuse

china of having we're getting that here

it's gonna go way beyond credit scores i

mean think about what this new culture

of vaccine mandates opens up it's a

slippery slope oh we accept vaccine

mandates now why don't we accept other

forms of identification and and um proof

of uh submission to the state and to

corporations to silicon valley you mean

other forms of proof of loyalty so this

is a very imp no i was talking about the

lysenko shit a few days ago and stuff

because i was specifically addressing

the justifications for vaccine mandates

which is trust in the science and the

establishment and i proved to you the

science is shit it's a idol it's a it's

a baphomet

it's a fucking moloch it's a it's an

idol right it's not the reason but i

didn't do that just to shit on science i

did it so we can get to the actual cause

of the controversy it's not about

science it's not about this it's not

about that it's about a material

revolution in the forces of production

and marxists are best equipped to

understand this type of thing and it's

what marxists should be doing but

instead we have dumb asses like q who

are spending their time getting whipped

up in the partisan frenzy of of taking

sides and being like oh i'm against the

truckers because they're bad and evil

and you're just a fucking liberal dude

you're not a fucking marxist the marx

just takes a cold distance analysis and

then they decide how am i going to

relate to it i take my cold analysis and

then i say i'm with the fucking truckers

according to the immortal signs of

marxism leninism i am with those

truckers now some may say something like

haas aren't the truckers reactionary for

trying to resist a revolution in the

forces of production no

they're not they're not reactionaries

because that resistance isn't about

impeding a revolution in the forces of

production it's not even necessarily

about vaccines it represents the beating

heart of the people of humanity and of

the historical

successors of the proletariat the

working class fighting for their

humanity fighting for their existence as

human beings fighting for their rights

amidst an attempt by the ruling class

and by the elites to secure their

existence at the people's expense

this resistance is beautiful

it's poetic

resistance

they had their great reset agenda

and all this shit

and from the soil of the people

those people in their trucks came out

and resisted it because they own the

trucks

they have the trucks the and this is

this is why it's so poetic beautiful and

communist

they have the real solid thing

elites you have your metaverse

you have your digital bullshit in your

digital control but you forgot about the

meat and potatoes means of production

now didn't you you forgotten the meat

and potatoes the concrete the steel and

the metal that makes all that shit

possible now didn't you you forgot about

those big trucks that facilitate all the

goods in general and in the same goddamn

fucking way you forgot about our goddamn

humanity that we're living breathing

flesh and blood that's what you forgot

about

this ruling class

it's the meat and potatoes they forgot

about and it's the meat and potatoes

that the truckers have now finally

there's one last thing i want to address

before getting deeper into the critique

of q and his fucking bullshit he doesn't

know shit about marxism doesn't know

shit about anything i'm gonna debunk it

many of these truckers if not most he

claimed that they're thriving and their

privilege is doing so well even if they

own their trucks how many of them are in

debt how many of them work as indentured

servants paying off the debt because

they don't even really buy the truck

they

it was loaned to them and they're paying

off the debt for it you forgot how this

is also about debt they're facing

extinction as a class because they can't

pay off the debt the traditional way in

which peasants were separated from their

means of production that's the creme de

la crop

this is an article i'm gonna take some

time to debunk with you all

we're gonna refute the common claims the

trucker convoy is not a worker's revolt

we'll see

we'll go ahead and see about that

oh my god

he earned his phd in sociology from york

university a fucking useless phd dumb

ass phd useless fucking

time wasting dumbass i shit on your phd

i wipe my fucking ass with your phd

i have given you like a dozen possible

explanations for why they're resisting

the mandates based on materialism this

guy is just going i don't know it's so

it's just one of those absurdities of

life such as the brilliant

and sweeping analysis of the controversy

at hand

such as the impartial cold materialist

analysis of adam king

that he's going to tell us that he

doesn't get it it's just it's just a

needle that's what this all what a

fucking philistine what a fucking idiot

it's just a needle it's just a needle no

clearly it's a lot more than just a

needle clear it represents a lot more to

these workers right clearly there's way

more at stake for them than just a

needle this is as fucking stupid as

saying like that politics is just about

policies or it's like i don't know um

this is just this is as fucking stupid

as saying the black lives matter

protests

were just about george floyd yeah people

make a big deal of shit that seems small

because those small things symbolize

much bigger things than just them by

themselves like it's just marxism 101

you fucking dumbass

this guy would read shakespeare and this

is an anti-semitic part of shakespeare

so trigger warning i guess when he'd

read shakespeare he'd be like oh my god

why was shylock making such a big deal

out of that pound of flesh it's just a

pound of flesh shylock why are you

making such a like this is the level of

philistinism and literary analysis for

reference in shakespeare shylock was a

jewish merchant who um he gave out a

loan to someone and he said listen

motherfucker

if you don't pay back this loan you

don't have any security to give me so if

you don't pay it back i want a fucking

pound of your flesh right and the guy's

like oh okay so the guy something

happened there was a storm that fucked

up the investment and shylock literally

it demanded give me that fucking pound

of flesh motherfucker and he wanted it

so bad but it's not because he wanted

the pound of flesh he wanted to make a

point he was sick of the hypocrisy of

society in you know the way it fucking

didn't make account for its debts like

not just financial debts but like in

general right but it's like this is the

love this is like such a philistine

idiot dumbass something is innocuous is

there i suppose these are the

unfortunate times in which we live so

this guy is positioning himself as like

wiser than the world he's in the know

he's so much smarter this is just the

ridiculous times we live in guys what a

sweeping

mature analysis of the situation this is

just a fucking npc that's all he is as

an npc he doesn't have any independent

thoughts

he's literally just assuming that his

establishment mentality his professional

managerial ideology is shared by the

whole world why do i have 260 fucking

notifications

i don't want 275 fucking notifications

excuse me excuse me i just don't okay

continuing um

the vaccine manage required those in

international trucking who cross the

united states border back into canada to

be vaccinated as of january 15th similar

vaccine has been rolled out for other

federally elected employees his work in

error the biden administration has

imposed a similar mandate ctv news

reported that those leading the freedom

convoy claim

26 000 truckers may not comply with the

mandate

it seems like a considerable

overestimation

the canadian trucking alliance says that

85 of the 120 000 truckers

have already been vaccinated is there

any interest why the canadian trucking

alliance would have a reason for

making that up

let's look up the canadian trucking

alliance let's just see if we're just

going to accept their statistics

what is the canadian trucking alliance

what is this relationship

to monopoly trucking

companies and the establishment i wonder

let's do a little bit of research and

follow the fucking money so it's a

federation of provincial trucking

associations

okay that's weird what are these

provincial trucking associations

um

crosstown across country the choice is

yours the face of trucking and career

opportunities advisor changing

oh how are they changing look at all

this fucking uh internet bullshit tech

savvy oh they want so it kind of looks

like they want fucking hipsters techy

hipsters to be the truckers and for

whatever reason it seems like they're a

little bit dissatisfied with the current

demographic of truckers who are just

boomers and um not really tech savvy

people so it it kind of looks like

something's going on with i don't know

it seems doubtful that they actually

represent truckers it seems like these

are people with an agenda to bring in

more truckers why would they have that

agenda right there's a labor shortage of

truckers what agenda do they have to to

solve that problem how does that help

truckers it makes it makes trumpers have

less economic leverage right so is this

does this represent truckers or do they

represent trucking companies and

trucking monopolies in bed with the

establishment and the government we'll

have to find out cta is a federation of

the country's provincial trucking

associations represents producer

carriers from all walks of life in all

sectors it includes sufficient

profitability and enhanced image

mutually beneficial partnerships with

customers safe and environmentally and

social okay when you get when you start

hearing about that environmental shit

that's a code word by the way just want

to let you know

um okay this is really mysterious and

vague but i'm gonna go ahead and deduce

without being able to conduct any

further uh research that this is glory

as fuck this is the establishment and

their fucking

claim

probably shouldn't be trusted that all

the trekkers are happy and satisfied and

that these this is just a minority of

bad apples of course they're gonna say

some shit like that it's fucking ruling

class propaganda and nothing more so we

can already deduce that's not a very

reliable source it's ruling class

propaganda government propaganda the

federal minister oh oh the federal

minister of transportation put it at 90

percent may as well put it at 95 since

you're probably just pulling it out of

your fucking ass but even if it was true

for the sake of having the devil's

advocate that the majority are

vaccinated it doesn't say anything about

whether they want to be vaccinated or

whether or not they relate to the

resistance against the vaccine mandate

for the material reasons i gave you

before for the class and material

reasons it doesn't even address any of

that according to these numbers yes

according to these numbers somewhere

between 12 000 and 18 000 truckers who

regularly cross the border are currently

not vaccinated and willing to bet that

more a few of them would rather get shot

than lose their jobs get the shot then

lose their jobs ah we're just gonna

threaten you with getting fired they

will obey me if i threaten them why

don't they get it voluntarily why do you

have to threaten them with their jobs

what he's that this person's definitely

made the successful case that there's no

basis among the majority of truckers for

the freedom convoy it's just a few bad

apples we just have to pretty much like

force them to get the shot at a

proverbial gun point but you know we

when i whip my surfs they just obey so

the serps are good and obedient because

when i whip them they obey what i say so

clearly they don't have a problem every

time i beat them with a stick they do

what i say and i'm sure my serfs if i

beat them harder will do what i say so

what's the problem why are these serfs

rebelling who's this who's this guy

thomas moonser thomas moonser the

peasant rebellion he's a complete

psychopath also he's being backed by

florian

florian guyer and the um the black army

of uh knights and those are privileged

knights okay florian guyer came from a

privileged knight background he does not

represent the peasants okay he's the

only knight that defended the peasants

but you know that song

[Music]

yeah that's propaganda because you know

this this um uh the black band of

florian guyer uh yeah that that was

those were not peasants those were

knights okay so clearly they don't

represent the peasants okay most of the

serfs i beat them with a stick and they

listen to what i say so be like a good

obedience sir be like a good peasant and

listen okay because when i beat them

with a stick they do what i say when i

threaten them with their jobs being lost

they'll be more than happy to comply

it's just these rabble rousers

causing disarray

my phd candidate i'm a phd i have a phd

it makes my nipples hard ah i'm thinking

about all the power i'm gonna have in

this new great reset they're gonna have

to all listen to me and i'm going to be

able to control all these vulnerable

people

and my agenda will be implemented

ah with no pushback

beat them with a stick so far

the liberals claim there's been no

noticeable reduction in trucks

ultimately the number of truckers who

prize their

freedom

freedom

there's some freedom for you

you

just haven't had a good old taste of the

whip

yeah once you get a taste of that whip

keep talking to me about your freedom

these peasants and serfs going on about

their freedom oh excuse me

freedom

next they're gonna start talking about

having rights

no no this is the best one this is the

best one

next they're going to start talking

about having

liberties

oh what's next what's next we're going

to let these peasants vote

oh man it's just out of the ballpark

freedom really freedom i mean what's

next

what's next uh independence like

emancipation oh yeah let's just

emancipate the serps guys let's just

let's just emancipate the serves i mean

these these peasants and their wild

delusions it's crazy it's crazy it's

absolute madness you know

anyway

i would say get others sick over

maintaining their livelihood is likely

to fall well short of their projections

by the political hucksters orchestrating

this modern so-called woodstock of the

petite bourgeoisie because you know

listen the petite bourgeoisie those are

the citizens those are the working class

i hate them you wonder why because

they're a little bit independent from me

meanwhile these vulnerable migrants and

marginalized groups who they're so

desperate it's so easy to control them

oh you better listen to me or else

you're getting deported you don't have

rights you're not a citizen you're

grateful to be here so i can control you

the petite bourgeoisie you know the

people who have the minimum of

independence who have leverage

the people i have to convince who aren't

going to rely on me based on pure social

desperation who i can't immediately

institutionalize to realize my agenda

the people i've had a hard time

convincing to be class conscious after

the 70s i read chairman mao's works i

read the works of chairman mao and the

quotation of chairman mao and when i

went to that construction site they all

spit in my families so i hate them but

when i talked to a crackhead on the

street he was pretty open to it um

so i think i know who the real

proletariat is now

i know who the real proletariat is now

anyway let's continue

the extent to which this convoy is

actually about trucking or truckers is

debatable

the network of far right wealthy

organizers and donors backing uh florian

geyer yeah he was a knight you think

thomas munser represents the peasants

why all the knights backing him okay

calls claims of authentic connection to

working-class truckers into question the

convoy's two principal organizers are no

figures of canada's far right the

canadian 80 anti-hate network draws a

range of further connections between the

convoy and far-right racist and

xenophobic elements oh i really believe

you let's see these are the two

principal organizers what is the

evidence of these being the two

principal organizers is there any

evidence of that okay a key party figure

in the maverick party is leading a

fundraising effort so that means he's

the leader of the convoy no if the far

right are the first ones to organize

fundraising that doesn't mean they're

responsible for the fucking convoy

itself you dumbass you should have been

there faster to fucking organize that

fundraising than they were they got

there first you snooze you lose you

dumbass you were out here denouncing

even before they started fundraising for

anything you were denouncing these

fucking truckers don't fucking sit here

and tell me your excuse for hating them

is because of the far-right organizers

when even before these people started

fundraising anything you came out

against them you fucking liar and

dumbass the toronto star reported last

week that gofundme i hate when people

can raise money without institutions

controlling it through which the convoy

organized raising money

was freezing 4.7 million

until it verified where the funds had

come from and on what they'd be spent

and you know why because it's just a

rational thing there's no ruling class

agenda there's no class base there's no

class war it's just the rational versus

the irrational and i'm a marxist and

this conflict is between the irrational

mob and the rational saying you know it

reminds me of this movie i watched marie

antoinette i don't know what like what

the french revolution was or what marx

had to say about it but i'm pretty sure

he would have been on the side of the

rational nobles and would have totally

denounced those irrational mob rabble

rousers who were just how dare they

marie antoinette and her friends were

rational and you know i i'm pretty sure

marxism is about being on the side of

rational people and not crazy rabble

rousers okay convoy organizers claim the

funds are used for fuel feud and loading

truckers when the convoy came to

kingston

kingston police

counted 17 full tractor trailers 104

tractors with no trailers 424 passenger

vehicles 6 rvs that's some expensive gas

in hotels no it's not you know how much

that shit costs do you know how much

this shit costs are you stupid are you a

fucking trucker yourself you don't know

how much it fucking costs at least one

third of the 2.8 million came from

anonymous donors oh like the anonymous

donors that funded the bolsheviks

sometimes yeah that happens you know

there's anonymous donors who fund me

they're called oil princes sometimes

they come and give me 100 subs does that

you know what i mean that's how it works

you fucking idiot just because someone

has money doesn't mean they're aligned

with the ruling class people who have

money can have all sorts of ideologies

and views and causes they want to

support you're an idiot for those using

fake names in some cases donations as

large as 25 000 were made anonymously or

using aliases

the latter a violation of gofundme's

terms of service

you violated the terms of service now

didn't you

and by the way

i'm the one who reported that

as of january 23rd

31st the convoy had raised more than 9.4

million

what

you mean they had mass support from the

people and you mean people rich and poor

and in the middle were all donating to

them what

no no

it's all nazis the cta which represents

the real truckers and not the

establishment and that totally believe

me trust me with al gabra

see ms o'regan the federal minister of

labor and carla qualtro

the minister of employment distancing

yourself from the so-called freedom

convoy

oh my god hold on wait

all right guys i was wrong everything i

said was just this whole stream

was wrong

because it turns out

the government distanced itself from the

freedom convoy and the government shill

cta

i can't believe the government distanced

themselves from the convoy i can't

believe it i can't believe i i give up i

i lost it's i you know i might as well

leave why am i still here

why am i even still here okay i didn't

know the government denounced them i

shouldn't i'm this is embarrassing i

gotta go guys sorry

why wouldn't the fucking government

distance itself from an anti-government

protest movement just curious before i

go can you please tell me that because

i'm willing to go this is a profound

beautiful point but can you please

explain to me why the government

wouldn't denounce them

who knows

the reason it lies us

the reason it lies us

still

we may never know

who knows i mean i don't know do you

know we may never know it's complete

mystery okay

let's continue

yeah there's no way to tell honestly the

joint statement reads in part

since the outset of the pandemic the

government of canada canada trucking i

don't give a fuck

the cta as the largest trucker employer

association

has

are you gonna tell us about what the cta

actually is are you gonna fucking lie

what does this mean what is a large

trucker employer association means

because it sounds like a government

thing to me it sounds like something in

bed with the government and the

companies and the establishment to me

that's what it sounds like it sounds

like the monopoly trucker companies are

this wait hold on

wait

i didn't even see that hold on i i

actually didn't see this

it's not even an employee association

it's an employer association these are

literally the bosses it's a fucking

association of the bourgeoisie i

literally didn't i didn't i i it's so

like unfathomable i assume this was

employee in my head i just caught it

this is an employer association

the cta is an employer association which

means it's the fucking bosses you

fucking idiot oh my god the rule

the managers

the employers are against it

what is this

hold on

[Laughter]

adam the king he's a union researcher i

bet i don't know what kind of research

he's doing

but he's citing the authority of an

employer association

guys think of the employers think of the

bosses the employers

yeah he researches grad student unions

what what am i okay hold on

you know what this this is so beautiful

you know for all their posturing they're

always gonna go back to sucking the cock

of the ruling class that's what these

people do

this he's like effortlessly citing the

cta like a legitimate respectable

authority that's the employer

association though that's the employer

association what you're just gonna

immediate you're just gonna like you're

just gonna like agree with them and be

like okay yeah they're right you're just

gonna side with the bosses basically

it's called on protesters remained

peaceful and sought to disavow any

connections to far-right elements

the association of provincial trucker

employer groups had previously argued

against the vaccine mandate resume at it

knowing that a vocal minority of its

small business membership opposed the

policy on the other hand as the business

representative for the industry that is

most engaged with the federal government

and understands and wants to maintain

its access to those with influence and

power

he wrote this not me he literally just

said the cta is in bed with the federal

government it represents the industry

and wants to remain it wants access to

those with influence and power so what

does that say about the statistics they

gave here distancing themselves and

saying 85 people all this shit literally

shut the fuck up spoken initially

complain of a labor shortage

conservative mps are not parrying the

line

steve the narrative of a perpetual

struggle shortage serves those with real

power in the industry the myth of a

constant labor shortage allows but there

is a labor shortage because of the

pandemic you fucking dumbass if there's

like a tendency for them to exaggerate

labor shortages whatever but right now

i'm pretty sure that's not what this is

i'm pretty sure there's actually a real

fucking labor shortage what a brain dead

stupid fucking article to write the myth

of a constant labor shortage allows

trekking firms to lobby governments for

looser regulations concerning labor

rights worker training and safety okay

but there actually is a labor shortage

right now there is one right now and

actually the labor shortage helps

truckers because it increases demand

which means they get paid more as long

as you know

they're not the fucking monopoly

industries who are hiring people labor

shortage is entirely superficial i'm

looking for a citation and he's talking

about the 1980s

in the in the aftermath of the pandemic

is there a labor shortage where is the

citation for this that it's entirely

superficial you may claim

that the long term it was entirely

superficial but how about now

deregulated to break the power of

organized labor and increase competition

through proliferation of small non-union

firms

once free trade agreements with the us

came into force canadian trucking was

overhauled the same way populated by

many competing for higher trucking firms

a proportion of which are operated by

relatively wealthy small business owners

well what proportion what proportion you

know you see this vague language he's

saying a proportion he doesn't want to

tell you that it's actually a minority

the majority are not wealthy it's a

minority who are wealthy the result for

most trucking workers has been

disastrous

working conditions of pay become so

degraded for the majority

that turnover is at record highs workers

are on the continents and terribleness

for so long it's almost like

the trucker convoy is the boiling point

of all that just like trump's was for

nafta

nafta lasted decades it only came to the

fore with trump this leads to a

situation where there's actually a

surplus of trained and licensed drivers

with growing numbers of them driven out

of the industry by horrendous conditions

here's the race stuff they're dependent

on a steady influx of temporary foreign

workers whose vulnerable citizenship

status leads them right for exploitation

which is true but that also means

they don't have enough leverage to be

able to revolt udairana at the globe and

mail reports that one in five truckers

canada south asian

okay yeah they they go through a shitty

time okay

employee misc classification is rampant

in the trucking industry small trucking

firms frequently forced the drivers

independent contract relationships this

is the key i talked to you about this

downloading financial risk and expenses

onto workers yeah i talked to you about

this a lot of these people listed as

um

operator owners are forced to do so

to list it on their llc's by their

companies so they can be less regulated

misclassification further relieves small

employers of making contributions to the

employment insurance the trucking sector

accounts for 80 percent of the labor

standards violations our research

further discovered that small businesses

with fewer than 100 employees accounted

for 89 of labor standards violations

that's not surprising because the bigger

ones are in bed with the government the

smaller firms employ only 13 percent of

workers in the federal jurisdiction wait

are you saying the overwhelming majority

of workers in the trucking industry are

either employed

by giant monopoly

truckers trucker companies who are not

present at the protests or

are not employed at all in our

small business owners who own their

so-called small business owners who own

their own trucks because if that's the

case that really damages your argument

that all the people at the protest are

just koolocks who hire others labor

because only 13 of workers are would be

hired by those people far away most

likely to break the law and

systematically violate workers rights

is small trucking firms okay no you're

wrong because

you're lumping in people who own trucks

and only own one truck who are probably

in debt with this tiny minority of

people who have fleets that they own you

fucking dumbass how do you even if you

own a fleet of trucks how are you even

gonna attend the protest you're gonna

force your employees to attend how are

you gonna bring all your trucks you can

only bring one truck dumbass or you can

ally with p you know what i mean it's

just so fucking stupid what this guy's

saying it's so brain dead you're gonna

hire your employees to drive your truck

to the protest shut the fuck up yeah

don't lump a guy with a truck who's

pretty much the same as an uber driver

with someone who has a hundred employees

or less i mean what a fucking broad

range of people that encompasses this is

such a stupid fucking article i can't

believe that q guy linked it like he was

saying something have you ever seen

someone get more thoroughly eviscerated

than cute tonight i would really feel

bad i would rather not be that guy at

all what a fucking joke

that's a fucking joke he linked this

shit as if he was making a point this is

the most stupid fucking

thing i've ever read interviewing many

federal government inspectors

confirms this okay the vast majority of

their time chased around mom and pop

trucking companies okay how many of

these companies are self-employed truck

owners in debt versus people who hired

who are a small trucker company that you

know owns a fleet of 25 trucks like if

you own a fleet of 25 trucks he's

including you with someone who's just

owns their own truck this is the most

stupid fucking methodology wait

it's almost over hold on i was waiting

for the part where he proves his thesis

he has to prove his thesis that the

trucker convoy is not a worker's revolt

that's what you have to prove here you

fucking idiot you didn't even prove it

we're getting to the end of this shit i

didn't get any statistics i didn't get

any data i didn't even get any claims

made so let's see what he says it's safe

to assume that the people who made the

trek to ottawa aren't the same people

filling labor violations claims with the

federal labor program why why is it safe

to us one why is it safe to assume that

and two even if they weren't that would

mean

that they're independent operators who

don't hire anyone but just own their own

trucks rather than exploited workers in

a deregulated industry hold on you

fucking weasel you fucking weasel piece

of shit you didn't guess the trucker con

you said it is not a workers revolt that

was not a guess it was an assertion it

was a statement it was a fucking

statement actually it wasn't a guess it

was a statement you made the statement

in your title and then at the tail end

of your fucking article instead of

justifying what your title was you just

said my guess well your guess is based

on what that truckers actually present

ottawa are by and large self-employed

owner operators the small contingent of

wealthier small proprietors who have

made quite well in the wild west out for

higher trucking again this is a wrong

and brain dead statement because you're

lumping in these small per you're making

two mistakes you're lumping them in with

the small companies that hire other

labor and own you know multiple trucks

you're lumping people who are just

self-employed with them two you're not

taking into account that many of these

small proprietors are probably in debt

and are probably facing financial

hardships and are at risk for losing

their trucks you're not taking any of

that into account it was a revolt of the

petite bourgeoisie financially backed by

wealthy right-wing grifters but you

haven't even proved that you're just

guessing so why did you assert that this

is not a worker's revolt the most you

could say is that you don't know right

the most you could say here is that i

don't know right but that's not what

you're saying you're you're making the

claim that it's a revolt of the petite

bourgeoisie because you guessed it to be

so now i'll have some good faith

um engagement with your thesis i think

it's not unfair to infer that the people

who are able to risk

and go to this convoy this thing

probably there's probably a very

significant portion if not

majority i don't know who own their own

trucks because they can't get fired that

way right they're not going to get fired

so that's not unreasonable to infer what

is unreasonable to infer

is that there's a significant portion

who owned multiple trucks because you're

making a very fatal fucking error

of confusing

by the way that wouldn't be the petite

bourgeoisie it would be the big

bourgeoisie if you own 25 trucks

you are a bourgeois and you hire a label

you're you're boujou you're not a

fucking petite bourgeois why because

you're a small company relative to a

monopoly with a thousand trucks get the

fuck out of here 25 trucks is a lot 25

people

i think you guys need to understand if

you hire like

five people that's five trucks if you

hire 10 people that's 10 trucks if you

hire 15 people that's 15 trucks if you

have 15 fucking trucks you're not part

of the petite bouzouzi if you own two

trucks you're probably not part of the

petite bourgeoisie if you own one truck

maybe i'll entertain the mistake you're

making and i'll forgive your mistake but

even then it wouldn't be true right the

petite bourgeoisie is the professional

managerial class today it doesn't really

exist in any other form this weekend's

idiotic pageantry was thus a political

consequence of the decades-long class

project to rebank the trucking sector uh

replaced with poorly regular labor

market of hyper competition among small

owner operators and other precariously

poisoned workers but i thought these

people were wealthy buzwazi and not

people either forced to list themselves

as small operators as a form of

misclassification or people who just are

probably in debt or even if they're not

in debt only own their own trucks

because you're lumping those in with

people who own 45 trucks by the way he's

he's actually saying that someone who

owns their own truck

is qualitatively the same

as someone who owns 70 trucks and hires

70 people to drive those trucks

that's what this guy's saying this is a

phd in sociology mind you guys

sorry the chat is kind of dead is

is anyone bewildered by this that q

linked this stupid fucking article is

anyone bewildered and just shocked that

this guy

made such a fucking ass of himself by

going on fucking twitter and sharing

this article like it actually said

something because here's what the

article said it has said my guess he

said it's safe to assume he didn't prove

why and he said it's my guess he didn't

even reason why that is you didn't even

give a reason for why that is you

dumbass are you trying to say there's

some comparison between the regulation

of vaccine mandates and labor

regulations is that what you're saying

you'd even make a fucking argument here

there wasn't even an argument to be

found in this stupid fucking article

right

liberal nostrums about trusting the

science of vaccines aren't enough to

address the most deeper issues only the

heavy lift of union organizing

building worker power and re-regulating

the trucking sector's labor market can

help be back the power of the far right

and its small business supporters

oh

so you're a parasite

and you have a phd in union research and

as it turns out the whole solution to

the problem is if

people give you power and listen to you

and unions are the panacea to this whole

thing you tried unionizing amazon you

fucking failed good luck

by the way i have no idea why this would

even address the issues on display of

the freedom convoy because you're making

a contradictory statement if what you're

trying to say is that the causes of the

freedom convoy

is that people are

precariously positioned and have all

this economic anxiety that would

contradict the statement you just made

that the freedom convoy is mostly made

up of wealthier small proprietors so how

would this address the freedom convoy if

all these people are wealthy kulaks the

only people who would benefit from this

are the people who according to you are

not at the convoy so what do you what

what is even the argument you're fucking

making what is even the argument you're

fucking making here it's completely

illogical and fucking brain dead and

stupid right

and i'm gonna make a tweet right now

because i have to

you know what people say on twitter i'm

not gonna go on your stream you wanna

know why guys because on twitter they

have the advantage everyone's against me

on twitter but as soon as they get in my

vc and they come here suddenly the whole

chat

you know they can't hold their own so

what does that say about you you fucking

pussy i can go on your turf and take on

thousands of people but you can't come

here and deal with my fucking chat you

fucking pussy without your fucking echo

chamber you don't have any ground to

fucking stand on you fucking pussy

i go on twitter and i take you all on

you can't even do the minimum of taking

on 400 people in my chat

500 people whatever

fucking pussy

these people on twitter they're hiding

behind each other they hide behind the

crowd i'm the only fucking man who

fights them as a man individually i take

them all on because of what i believe i

don't fucking hide behind anyone

but they can't come on my turf because

they're scared here we're the majority

you can never be put in a fucking

situation where you're the minority you

could never be put in a fucking

situation where you're the one who has

to hold your own against the majority

you fucking pussies you can only do it

when you have all the support of all

these followers and likes i will grow in

anyone's community and take on the head

guy i went in vosh i had 50 viewers i

went and took on vosh i had 50 viewers i

went and took on destiny all these

people i went on their turf alone and i

took them on you think i fucking respect

these pussies who need all this social

support

this is q by the way that's not a joke

this is literally him

this is actually cute

this is actually cute

i yeah

that's actually him

and yeah you know this is it's justin

trudeau and this guy calls himself a

marxist he says he's a marxist or

whatever and he's just he's just he's

just revolutionary right

and doesn't shit just make sense

shit just kind of makes sense doesn't it

it just kind of makes sense like that

i mean you will not find me

you will never find a picture of me

shaking hands

with someone like this you just won't

oh yeah i want to i want to expose more

of uh q's blunders

because this actually is fucking um

embarrassing right

so there's two tweets i'm gonna address

right there's this one

this one okay

so the two ones i'm gonna address and

we're gonna move on to covering the

jackson thing

so this guy such a smart guy

i told him to read the development of

capitalism in russia because he alleged

the middle peasant only came about after

the revolution that's not fucking true

it existed as early as 1899 and he he

says oh the wealthy peasantry took up

their place among the petit bourgeoisies

see look at this carefully worded

language the wealthy peasantry among the

petite bourgeois among which petite

bourgeois that the minority of them that

exploited other laborers or the people

who just owned their own land and didn't

hire any labor that's a very important

distinction lenin thought it was an

important distinction so this is the

evidence he provided me that lenin

agrees with him that the petite

bourgeois peasantry were bad right

here's what lenin said the system of

socioeconomic relations existing among

the peasantry shows us the presence of

all those contradictions which are

inherent in every commodity economy and

every order of capitalism

competition yada yada yada conservation

of production the hands of minority

forcing of a majority into the ranks of

the proletariat their exploitation by

minority through the media of merchants

capital and hiring of farm laborers

there is not a single economic phenomena

among the peasantry that does not bear

this contradictory form one specifically

peculiar to the capitalist system that

does not express a struggle and

antagonism of interest doesn't imply the

advantage of some and independent

brothers

it is the case with renting the land the

purchase of land and with the industries

okay

what does this have to do with what i

said

this doesn't address what lenin said

about the small petty is this fucking

idiot trying to say that lenin made the

claim that all peasants were either

proletarians or

capitalists that's not true

lenin understood there's a lot of shit

in between he wrote about it holy fuck

do i have to pull it up

the development

of capitalism in russia

i guess i have to pull this shit up now

differentiations of the peasantry

so

conclusions

okay

so

keep in mind

uh q claimed that the middle peasantry

does did not exist before the revolution

lenin wrote this in 1899 here's where he

talks about the middle peasantry

the differentiate the peasants which

develops the latter's extreme groups at

the expense of the middle peasantry keep

in mind lenin was describing a phenomena

a phenomenon that never fully came into

fruition but on top of this phenomena of

the differentiation of the peasantry

into proletarian and bourgeoisie there

was the middle peasantry and the middle

peasantry were just these the democratic

petty bourgeoisie who just owned their

own land that was the middle peasantry

okay who remained the majority mind you

they were undergoing a class struggle

internal to the middle peasantry so this

guy's a fucking dumbass he cited

something that talks about the way in

which the middle peasantry has its own

class struggle but nowhere does he no

nowhere does it address

that lenin regarded the middle peasantry

as a revolutionary class as a whole

taken as a whole now he thought the

proletariat should lead the middle

peasantry

obviously

but he was referring to the middle

peasantry as a whole

okay

um

and this is what he said peasants who

worked their own land and did not expect

labor as others were largely present

before the revolution yes

lenin literally talks about them here

and here and here in here and here and

here in here yes they were what a

fucking illiterate guy this is the guy

who argued with me who ray showed me

look at him 155 likes 165 where's how

much did i get 80. this is how fucking

stupid twitter is i'm losing my mind

you'd think i'm wrong is this a sign i'm

wrong that i get ratioed how can i be

correct though i got ratio how am i

correct how is this guy a fucking idiot

who is wrong and i'm correct can you

explain that to me how is he wrong yet

he rey shows me and i'm correct can you

explain that to me i'm losing my fucking

mind here this is how fucking if you

want to know why twitter is fucking

stupid and that what's popular on

twitter isn't what's true or what's

correct

look no further than here this idiot

doesn't even know that the kulaks

emerged after the stolipin reforms not

the revolution the stolipin reforms

created the kulaks before the revolution

the majority were middle peasantry the

development of capitalism in russia

referred to the way in which the middle

peasantry were increasingly being

divided yes but they remain the middle

peasantry all throughout up until even

collectivization in the majority of

cases the middle peasant cannot make

ends meet without resorting to loans to

be repaid by labor service every crop

fairing the middle peasant the rural

proletarian by comparison with the

middle peasantry consumes less so he's

distinguishing the middle peasantry from

the rural proletariat and the peasant

bourgeoisie lenin regarded the middle

peasantry as the revolutionary class

led by the proletarian element within it

which would be brought out through the

industrial urban working class so that's

why he believed in the alliance of the

urban workers and the rural peasants and

lenin and mao

discovered that you don't even need to

go through the urban workers you can

just

have the peasants lead the peasants

because the urban ones are actually not

revolutionary lenin learned that the

hard way after 1917

the urban working class betrayed the

revolution they led strikes they

sabotaged shit

they proved to be a

counter-revolutionary force

did you know that

or they either join the army and died or

the ones that stayed they were

sabotaging shit they were going on

strikes

they were

protesting the bolsheviks and all this

fucking bullshit

they were wreckers

okay labor service presupposes and

requires the middle present one who is

not very affluent but is also not a

proletarian so he's talking about this

substrate that reproduces the conditions

of labor the middle peasant that was

lenin's brilliance was this this book is

more this is the most brilliant thing

lennon ever wrote by this is lenin's

like magnum opus this is why lenin was

lenin this is what defined him not the

state in revolution not what is to be

done not not anything else not even

imperialism the highest stage oh that

comes as a close second

this is how lenin made a difference in

the history of marxism this book

in which lenin pointed out the wealthy

peasantry took up that has nothing to do

with the middle peasantry though

that has nothing to do with the middle

peasantry this

this is meaningless this can either

refer to the middle

peasantry which lenin did not view the

wealthy peasantry to be in association

with or it can refer to the peasant

bourgeoisie

who were synonymous with the wealthy

peasantry

this

is a stupid fucking word to use because

is it is he referring to what lenin

called the middle peasantry or is it

referring to the up and coming peasant

bourgeoisie we don't fucking know we

don't know

but if this is meant to refer to the big

boo the peasant bourgeoisie it's not

relevant to my point if it's meant to

refer to the middle peasantry it's

fucking wrong this does not say that

he's not saying the middle peasantry is

turning into the bourgeoisie the middle

peasantry is divided that's the fucking

point how old is this q guy because i am

schooling him i am dominating and

fucking destroying him beyond the

threshold of recovery it's fucking sad

it's actually fucking sad it's so

fucking sad

okay

he came on stream

uh

long time ago

and he he sucked up to me he was really

nice and polite and cordial

look at this

farmers are joining in the protests too

in canada

wow

the whole working class is rising

and the left is denouncing them as nazis

what

what what are we what do what is this

what are we fucking living in the whole

working class is uniting

i'm going on jackson's twitter

it's where i got it from the whole left

is uniting

and the left and sorry the whole working

class is uniting it's an uprising of the

canadian people and the left is

denouncing them as nazis

what the fuck on earth is going on

aren't we communists supposed to be the

ones

trying to

lead this or or or reach out to these

people

what is going on

oh where's the nazi flags you guys see

any nazi flags i don't

where's the nazis you asked for it

everybody

there they are

there they are

where's the nazi flags i don't see any

[Music]

amazing

this is awesome the left is denouncing

this

i i don't i don't know what the fuck to

say i don't it's

holy fuck

okay