🔴 TRUE RED PILL NEWS, INSIGHT AND FACTS

and

you know

the

you're and you know

the

you're

I'm and so you know

the

I'm I'm and the uh...

uh...

you know

the uh... and you know

the

one

the and so

I'm going to

I'm going to The and so you know

the

you're and so on the one of the

one of the

I'm I'm The The The The and you know, I'm

going to

I'm The The The The The and so you know

the

I'm I'm The and you know

the

I'm

the and you know

I'm

I'm

I'm The The I'm The The and so on the one of the

one of the

one of the You know, The and you know, I'm

a

I'm and so you know

the

you're The The The and you know my know The and you know my

and

I'm The

No,

No.

No.

No.

No.

No.

M.

I'm and so you know

the

uh... The and so uh...

uh...

the

one

the

uh...

and uh... and the the borkman

the

I'm

the The You know, The I'm The The The The and so you know

the

you're

I'm The The and you know

the

I'm and so on the one

the The and uh...

uh...

uh... and so you know

the and the uh...

the

uh...

the

one

the

one

so

the so so so and you know

the

I'm

the The The The and the uh...

I'm

I'm

the and you know

the

I'm and you know the

I'm

I'm

I'm The The The The The and you know my mrs The The The and the you know

the

BOR,

BOR,

BOR,

BOR,

BOR, BOR,

So,

and

B,

you know, The Thank you. The The

On the

Pondon Torn

Torn

Torn

The

The

Tons is Mauts

Torn

He left

our

our Japan He left We're living We're

We're living

When people

Backson

As a

man

To the

I have

A year

Ria and

Rue

Unmings

Don't

Rue Rue Rue Rue Renn and you're unming van fern down as a

person

man

and and I'm Oh Oh and the and you know, Thank you. I'm Oh. Oh. we can't we're in the

home the strong the

pan down a pin down

a pinck

trang by

ten feet of sound light Chang-bigh-Thoulli's sound like,

Highland Jiangxan,

Han-Hung-Cy,

air-and-quieting,

Chian-Co,

down,

quay the sea,

the way, the way, un-uquy-hawan-h quay quay the high my lo

lo quay

want

like

y'

yon

night

night

pan

men

and ming and

ching

our

sun

through thai y'

Mow

t in the sun Pondayor Oh

a

my chur

we're

our our

unhing

and

I am

the in

the

people

to the

people

and

the

people

and the people and, and, and,,,, and I'm going to I'm I'm not I'm I'm going to I'm

a lot

I'm I'm going to

I'm

I'm

I'm you know, is the wimbo mrs.

It's a waybubu jumb

co-mojure

in a wimbo-who a weiwoh come back you know you know that's

you

a way

that's might man

a

woman

people

a un

a

un

a

a

a a a a a you and I'm you and you you've been awa'i you can't

you're

you know

that you your

and I'm

the

you're who

who

who I'm who

you're who who I'm and I'm

you I'm I'm I'm and I'm not I'm gonna lay I'm gonna hear I'm gonna see

when I'm

I'm gonna coo coo no

my come on the world I'm gonnae I'm gonna

I'm gonna'

away

you know

my mom

mebe

bojumbe

cobo a copam mocha

and And the woman who Iwe can't hear of this

manatam

who women

who

we can

who won

I'm and

I'm

he can

be

and who people

and

you you you and you and you and you and I mean, I got you a couple it, I'm gonnaeer and I'll get

a who

I'ma

my mombuy

I'mo

a woman a I was in the way I believe you I'll be fascinated with my cordial

my wife

I'm gonna

make sure

so much

I'm

my

a woman and

a woman

a

so

I'm gonna a and I'm

a one a one of who you know, and I'm gonna' me I'm a

one

I'm Mour

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm and I'm back who I'm gonna me et al-

t'emap

for you

have seen have been chas

and I'm

a couple fat-tram

and

come a

man

and come a

and I'm

and my and my and and I the way of you a manu, it's a woman

It's

Aweb of the way of the way in manadem, who are the woman who

can't

you know

a woman

you know

a woman

a woman

you who

you know you

your

your your your your

and it I'm a um um in a carluckoole of the other people who in bolley or a-cuhu-o-cuhu-cissuant and i'm the world of titherto y'alluzum no l'u.

D'handlea, and I, and I, passi, and b'n, and bachiawana, and I'ma-lis-mau-treat, and I'm aught, and soot I'm aught. but what I used to come in one my eyes my mouth

and I'm a lot

and I'm

that's

how much

a

co-o'

and

I'm going to

a man

I'm going

away

I'm going

away

I

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm a woman bebo,

Jomba, cup a mocha,

cutica offi,

coo,

and wemo,

who we may

hame

that's a matum unco unwa

a you know wimbo that's all the woman who

I'm the

I'm a lot

I'm

there

I'm a

man that

I'm

people a

I'm

it's a

it's

a

wimba

who who who who who I'm a way and boiombo I'mauchy

a lot of

I'm gonna beaute a lot of

a lot of

the world

and I'm

that's

and I'm and I'm and

I'm

so on

so ches in a and so

and

that I and I'm a and I'm and I'm not so much in the other time. I'm gonna

come out of

my car

someone

on the same

off the battle

and I'm gonna

go ahead

until you are

going away

and go

and mo,

and mo, and moly

and

walk with sea for wrong so no no no and I'm a woman, bough, umboleo, um, sit around a utu

new

I'm a

way, I'm

there

I'm I'm

and I

do you

and I

know I'm people

I'm

so

what

I'm

and what you

and

I'm and I that's I'm

a lot

and come

and come Pets

in the

I'm

Mour

Maly Mour Maly M

M

Mb Mb

Jomb

Mbbo Jomb

Pob

Mota Kopp and

that you Cuck and It's a Wimbao, you knowimbao, you know what, you take a-c-cuck-cuh.

And Wimbo, oweza tia matumai,

is man-dem, one-dama-pawangooka.

It's a-wimbo-mtramuwa.

Waiza-wamuwa-wani, you-fimwa-aw-li. always up to more warming, I don't want me, open more I'm always.

Always open one now. Oh, I'm going to be.

And so many people. and I don't know. And I'm going to be able to be a street

when I had a little

I'm like a

I got a

I got a good

and I'm going to be a

man

and a I'm going to see and the you know and

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm gonnae. And I'm not.

And I'm not.

I'm not I'm

I'm

No I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I one I'm going to

be a

and

I'm

on every I'm I'm going to be on my own. I'm going to be.

And I'll

I know. and I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

I'll see. and the I'm going to

I'm

I'm

I'm uh, uh,

uh,

uh,

uh, and I'm

I'm

No and I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going to be there

and I'm going to I'm

a a a man Yo, what's up Dark NRG? What's going on, bro? Appreciate that.

Well, what's up, everybody? What's going on?

We've got quite a lot on the itinerary today, you know, but I'm going to be talking like this the entire time

today just because, just because I can, you know, and I, I, I, I strongly feel like I have to.

Hello, everyone, it's me, no one, I'm Chomsky.

I was on Epstein's Island, and I was hanging out with Steve Bannon, and I was on, and it was just, you know, the reason was because I understood that the collapse of the Soviet Union

was a tremendous success

for socialism

because the tree of real socialism

was when the anarchists

lowered the age of consent in Catalonia.

And I talked extensively with Mr. Epstein about how an anarchist society would be much more conducive to human liberty and the lowering of the age of consent, and how Lenin actually betrayed the real revolution, and he was a dictator because he raised the age of consent to an unreasonably high level, and Mr. Epstein concurred with me that this was

unreasonable and you know it's really about how they're manufacturing the age of consent to be a lot higher

than it really should be.

And another thing that I was talking to Mr. Epstein about, and we both completely concurred about this,

is that the problem with the Leninist form of dictatorship and perversion of true socialist values,

which is a corruption of the real socialism.

Real socialism hasn't been tried.

Is that, well, when you really think about it,

the age of consent is the ultimate form of authoritarianism.

Because as a linguist, and that's what Mr. Epstein was very interested in a lot of my scientific theories.

You have to remember, I'm also a scientist.

As a linguist, I developed a notion called universal ibupilia, and it's similar to universal grammar.

The basic theory is that programmed in our brains,

every human being on earth is linguistically programmed to be attracted to children.

And Mr. Epstein concurred with me that this is universal grammar.

There's a universal syntax and a universal grammar shared by all human beings, which, and Mr.

Epstein agreed. He said, I completely agree because I have that hardwiring myself, and if I have it, so almost everyone else.

So from first principles, Chomsky has proven human universalism by going on Epstein's

Island and observing crimes against children.

Well, guys,

uh,

here I am.

Here I am, guys. I have a lot to talk about.

We have a lot to talk about, right? So first of all,

Noam Chomsky. First of all, is he still alive? That's my first question. Noam Chomsky.

Hold on. I genuinely don't know the answer to this.

Okay, he is 97. Can this guy fucking die already?

Honestly, I fucking always hated Noam Chomsky.

He is a cancer on the left. He's the worst.

I mean, he's the reason we have Redditors talking about authoritarianism

he is just awful

okay

but anyway we're not here to talk about

Chomsky it's just the thought dawned upon me

because I was like holy fuck well that's the discredit not here to talk about Chomsky, it's just the thought dawned upon me.

Because I was like, holy fuck, well, that should discredit him forever, right?

We're here to talk about Candice Owens and the controversy around Candice Owens.

Why is Boy Wonder continuing to attack Candice Owens?

And he's siding with TPUSA against Candice Owens.

Jackson covered this pretty masterfully and pretty well, actually.

And I have a conspiracy theory that I want to share about Nick Fuentes.

I have my own conspiracy theory.

I want to share it.

All right.

Have I shared this?

Have I shared the French conspiracy theory with you guys before?

Have I ever shared this?

Because I've talked about it with Jackson before and we're like, you know, this makes way too much fucking sense, right?

So the basic idea.

Oh, I didn't tell you about it. All right. It's so fucking weird, right? So we were thinking about it.

So was this in 2022 or what? Sometime in 2022. Get this. All right. Just let's just like try to make sense of what's going on with this kid, right?

2022.

He gets $250,000 in Bitcoin.

From where?

Well, supposedly some guy in France committed suicide and then sent 250K to Nick Fuentes.

What a lucky coincidence.

I mean, wow.

That's interesting.

That's something we would just probably ignore and brush under the rug and just not pay a lot of attention to

because, you know, maybe that could happen.

Maybe there's some guy

in France who's just a big fan of

the American

all right and he killed

himself and he gave his Bitcoin to Nick Fuentes

sure maybe right

all right

stay with me now stay with me now right? All right.

Stay with me now.

Stay with me now.

There's some other odd things I started to notice.

We started to notice.

Such as one of the fault lines that led Nick Fuentes and that entire milieu to attack us, but Nick Fuentes was leading the charge.

Me and Jackson.

Was it just about black Africans and black people in Africa? Well, not really.

I think we were denying the white genocide in South Africa, and we were still not being attacked by him, and that was not the trigger.

He didn't really care about South Africa. But when we started

promoting and glorifying and covering in a positive light, the revolutions

in the ECOWAS countries

and in the Sahel

for some reason that started triggering Nick Fuentes

like a lot like

Burkina Faso for some reason

like triggered the fuck out of him right

Mali Burkina Faso Niger like for some reason, like, triggered the fuck out of him, right? Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger.

Like, for some reason, this is the thing that's like, wow, this is a fucking too far.

And obviously, it's like, it makes sense

for white nationalists to be triggered by it

I guess I guess it's consistent with a white

nationalist worldview

that oh well you know you're glorifying black

people and we don't like black people

but notice how selective he is with that

kind of racism. You'll see

him elsewhere talking about how,

oh, well, you know, we're actually against racism.

It's okay. You know, we don't actually have hatred.

We don't actually think anyone's

inherently superior to anyone else.

So he's so selective with it i don't know if i could

really i know it seems obvious it's like okay he's a nazi this is what you'd expect a white

nationalist or whatever to think but he's just not consistent but you know what is consistent

you know what is consistent.

You know what is a consistent thing?

Yeah, you should share with me the thing with Richard Spencer about seething about Jackson.

But you know what is consistent or seems to be consistent at least?

That this threatened French colonial interests

would the French government

have a vested interest

and you know

fighting against

pro-Russian propaganda

that would

you know that that was pro you know russian interference in africa that's undermining french influence and interests

probably the french state probably would have a vested interest in that, you know?

So it's a little weird.

Okay, then another weird thing

happened that I actually remember off the top of my head

from memory. When there was a right-wing

uprising in France, keep in mind

this was not

inherently leftist. It wasn't inherently

left-wing. There was a lot of

nationalist and right-wing sentiment

involved in that.

Do you guys

remember when Nick Fuentes said that he

supports Macron's repressions

of the protesters? He's like, I support

Macron, yeah, crush him. And like a

really offhanded weird comment and nobody

I guess you could like

try to square that

with his general

support for authoritarianism

or whatever but even that's not consistent

because then why don't we just support Zionism

and Netanyahu and stuff

right

and then so you you I remember Yahoo and stuff, right? And then...

So you...

I remember he was, like, weirdly

siding with Macron in that

thing, right?

And then

you start to think about

other things. okay um let's look at on the surface the development or i should say the

deterioration of EU israel relations On the surface, they're not very great.

It doesn't seem like the French government has a great

relationship with Netanyahu specifically. Maybe not Israel as a

whole or Israel in general, but the Netanyahu and Macron don't seem to be the best of friends.

And that has seemed to just continually deteriorate. I mean, in public, you know, the French government would not be making overt anti-israel sentiment and rhetoric but

what would their views be in if they if mccron or the french government or french deep state

was kind of running an influence campaign and and you know supporting a type of discourse or whatever, what would that be?

It would probably be something that could bypass a lot of the geopolitical obligations France has overtly to the world.

So you could start to think about even the Israel angle on his end in that light, right?

And then you should pay close attention to the development, or I should say the deterioration of French-Russian relations in light of the Ukraine War.

Now, admittedly, he originally seemed to support Russia and the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the whole world was,

it was so easy to see and observe that

who was getting fucked over

by the support for Ukraine

and America's position in Ukraine.

It was Europe.

It was the German and French industries that were getting fucked over because they're losing access to Russian energy.

Is it impossible to think that forces in the French deep state, at least initially, you know,

the people that signed to Minsk two times,

I think actually, I don't know if it was two times. I know for the second time that they were there

as an observing party or an enforcing party, wouldn't it be within their interest to put an

end to that and not support adventurism right and then

now you could maybe ignore all of that i guess it's like a stretch you think about like the the Catholic monarchy

Larp and it's like well that's kind of like

seems to be something

Macron would support

it kind of seems to be like in line with that

entire ideology or whatever right

okay but you know what the like the final narrative in line with that entire ideology or whatever, right?

Okay, but you know what the, like the final nail in the coffin for me?

That like starts to make me actually think, like, what the hell's going on?

Is the Candace shit shit what is it about the bridget mcron being a man and the you know that whole thing why did that activate flentes and like trigger him so much against candace

like why does he have this irrational i mean you could just say well he's upset that he's she like dwarfs him

and viewers and eats his lunch or whatever and she's just like much more successful

and he's upset about that because his generational run is clearly i mean candace is like

outrunning him by a lot, right?

You could say it's like a gatekeeping dynamic or something,

or jealousy or resentment or envy. Fuck this piece of shit, Mike. All right.

Yeah, though, this mic is a piece of shit.

I just touch it in one way and it all gets fucked.

I need to buy a new mic.

Just can't afford one right now.

Anyway, guys,

um...

Yeah, it could be like a jealousy thing or an envy thing.

For sure, but there's something about the french angle that consistently

brings out a side of his views on the world that don't square with his like like whether it's the protest within france whether

it's randomly getting upset about the burkina faso west africa shit specifically whether it's

candace and bridget mccron it's like from and Bridget McCrott. It's like, from a rational perspective, why is this a red line?

What is this?

Maybe he has a secret, you know, nuanced attachment to the EU for ideological reasons.

I don't know.

But then I think about the $ 250,000 in Bitcoin that was mysteriously transferred to him from apparently someone who committed suicide back in 2022. And I honestly got to think. People sleep on France.

France is an actor in the world.

There is a French, like deep state.

France is not just a subordinate of the USA.

It's not just an American colony.

France, yeah, like the thing

Candace is exploring with the French

Foreign Legion and all that shit

regarding Charlie, it's like

very plausible to me.

Anyone who knows anything about France

would not find that to be like

impossible to to comprehend, right?

So,

what do we make of it i now do i am i claiming i know this for certain am i claiming that

i have this insider knowledge no i'm just Like, genuinely, is there something going on

there? You know, he, he says, oh, he says without any reservation that we are Russian agents

and that we work for Russia, which is a lie, by the way.

He's spreading anti-Russian propaganda on behalf of who you have to ask.

But I won't lie. I'm not a liar.

Okay, I'm not going to pretend like I know this for certain.

I just think it's an interesting angle that nobody ever brings up.

Like, why does no one ever bring this up? Why does nobody bring up these odd connections?

When it comes to like French foreign policy interests, French, the personal familial interests of Macron and Bridget McRohn in general.

I don't know.

I don't know.

It's just, I feel, and this is one of those things where it's like I feel like there are even more coincidences that I don't even know about that I'm not even touching on, right?

But it would not surprise me in the least if we're dealing with something like that here.

You know?

So what do you guys think? I don't know. I wanted to put that out there before anything.

Because I don't think I've ever shared this theory

before.

And I don't know. I don't know. It just kind of... shared this theory before. And

I don't know. I don't know.

It's just kind of like, hmm,

kind of just like,

what I want is people to explore that more,

you know? Because maybe there's

it's nothing. Maybe it's nothing.

Maybe it's nothing, right?

But I feel like if people have this like,

entertain the hypothesis at least, they'll start maybe

to notice more patterns. That's what I'm thinking. I don't know.

I'm getting attacked with millions of followers.

I guess this is supposed to...

This is supposed to...

You know what?

Oh fuck, I already have follows.

Ah, okay.

Alright, well, I could just... Pause that.

Can I... I can't pause it.

Can I mute it?

No.

Can't mute it either.

These are the French bots attacking me.

What's going on? I'm being attacked by French bots attacking me. What's going on?

I'm being attacked by French bots.

Like, guys, what's going on here?

You know?

It's like, what's this?

Huh? Maybe I am on to something maybe I am

Venezuelan Patriot what's up bro appreciate you

it's like maybe maybe I am onto something

these are French Franco bots

okay

okay French Franco bots, okay?

This is incredible.

Y'all are witnessing it in real time.

Bees. So

So So So Delete the components for the follow pop-ups.

I actually can't do that.

Strah, Stanley, what's up with the 10?

Appreciate you, bro.

What's going on?

Appreciate you.

Yeah, I don't know how to fucking get rid of this.

This is so fucking horrible. Hold on.

Oh. That did stop it. Oh. Oh.

Okay.

Kai with the 10.

What's up, bro?

Kai with the 10, appreciate you.

Ah.

Oh, this is BotRicks.

Bro, I can completely control this.

I can totally control this.

This is not an issue, all right?

We're good, bro.

We're good, bro. We're good. All right, let's go to widgets.

And then alerts.

We just got to go to alerts. We just gotta go to alerts.

I need a donation button so you guys can have text to speech.

Hold on, I gotta deal with this in alerts. Jay, what's up? Iverling. What's going on, bro? Appreciate you.

Okay, hold on.

SIEOP with the five, what's going on? Appreciate you.

Okay, here it is, alerts.

Alright, I have an alerts thing already.

Okay, I have that.

Followers.

Um... Okay, I can delete this.

Okay. Active alert. Got rid of it.

Alright.

Save settings.

Hold on, I'm about to fix this forever.

Never have to fucking deal with this again.

Finally!

Space time! What's going on, bro? Appreciate you.

Stralis, yeah, finally.

Jesus Christ, right?

So we're never going to have to... We're never dealing with that again, ever again.

Okay?

Versaise with the 10. What's up?

I totally fixed it. We're never... we never have to deal with that ever again.

And now all these wonderful people, their donations are going through.

I mean, they've been going through, but the alerts for the donations are going. You get the fucking idea, right?

So, yeah. So, okay. but the alerts for the donations are what you get the fucking idea right so yeah so okay

back on track back on track the french deep states attack just didn't work okay sorry sorry bridget mcron sorry mcron doesn't work okay sorry sorry bridget macron sorry mcron doesn't work okay anyway space time what's up so versaage what's up

appreciate you all right Versaise, what's up? Appreciate you.

All right.

So y'all,

y'all, in case you're new, you know,

in case you're new, this is... By the way, I look like this, bitch.

Don't ever fucking...

Don't be trying to bombard me with fucking...

Follows, bitch!

I'm a crazy fuck!

Oh, they're just gonna spam my...

My chat.

I don't know what to do

about this.

I mean,

you got me, I guess.

Like, what do I even do about this?

You're literally spamming me with chatters.

Wow, guys, look at these real chatters.

Bro, I don't even look.

I don't even know if this theory is true or not.

Did I touch a nerve? I literally, this is something I thought I shared before. Did I touch a nerve? Oh, Oi-Ve! No, wait, what's the French

version? Shut it down! Shut it down!

Don't reveal the French connection.

Oh, wow, wow, wow, wow.

Shut it down.

Shut it down.

It shut down.

Don't reveal the French connection.

Bro, how crazy is this?

All I did was share a theory.

It wasn't even a theory as a hypothesis.

All right, hold on.

I know how to do this.

You just got to lock the chat, right?

Chat.

Oh, slow mode.

That's all I got to do.

Yeah, slow mode for...

Let's do one minute.

All right.

Oh, subscriber only.

Yo, what a wonderful idea.

What a wonderful idea to just

crab it up.

All right, motherfuckers, pay me.

If you want to do that shit, you got to subscribe, motherfucker.

Yo, for all the non-subscribe, my bad. but this is, I guess this is the only way we can sort this out.

Yo, all right, we're good.

So that's gone, that's just over.

Right? We do, France defeated. Macron defeated. Wow. Here was I think, here I was thinking we wouldn't have content today. Let's guys, let's do a, let's do a refresh. Get some sun gorillas in the chat. I can't believe this.

I was just sharing my hypothesis that he literally is an agent of the French state, and which does make sense. I mean, it's not like totally implausible.

It's not proven, but it's a hypothesis.

I've never even seen anyone float before.

Like, I've never even seen anyone float this hypothesis before.

And then, you know, a lot of times people are just like, oh, are you serving the Jews or are you not serving the Jews? But, you know, the Zionist Jews in France are not necessarily 100% aligned with the American, you know, neocon Zionist Jews, right? So you've got, you know, neocon, Zionist Jews, right?

So you've got, you know, you've got different Jews, I guess, but France is a thing.

You know, Macron worked for the Rothschild Bank.

Literally he did.

He worked for the Rothschild Bank.

He's an ex-Rothschild's banker, right?

So some shit is going, bro, what did can't me and now me and Candice are the victims?

Oh no.

Me and Candice are victims now.

Think about that.

We're onto

something deep and dark

when it comes to French

foreign interference

in U.S. affairs.

And by the way, I don't hate France.

I dislike Macron a lot, though, for sure.

Oso's with the Five. What's going on?

You know what? You know what? The President it was right in front of us the entire time The The Groypers. Their...

They're...

frogs. Frogs They're frogs

They're frogs

They're sitting in front this entire time

this entire fucking time it's been right in front of us

jesus christ paperwin what's up Jesus Christ

Paperwyn, what's up?

You know, I don't know.

All right, no, but on some real shit. Everything else I was saying was pretty. I don't know.

All right, no, but on some real shit.

Everything else I was saying was pretty... Kind of onto something, aren't I?

Kind of onto something.

You know, I don't know if Jackson invented this theory.

No, we both did. We we have joint authorship over this i don't know if jackson's ever shared it

but we've talked about it before and i could have sworn i shared it with you guys

but um yeah

no like this is on some real shit it's like

there is a strange like for some

reason defensiveness

here's what I say that it's pretty fair

there's a strange consistent

pattern of defensiveness

when it comes to Macronccron and his family and french foreign policy

consistent very consistent like view on french foreign policy now is that based in some kind of

like european nationalist ideology? Maybe.

Or is it based on the 250,000 Bitcoin he mysteriously got from France, from someone who supposedly killed himself, right? So, you know, I'll let you think about it yourselves. I've thought

about it a lot. If I had a definitive answer, I would share it with you. But I think if we have this

hypothesis, we don't have to conform facts to your hypothesis,

but it's something to kind of like

be on the lookout for. Maybe there's

like more connections that even I don't know

about. That's the thing.

Because

it's like every position he has seems to be aligned with Macron even including the

wariness of the hyper-Islamophobia you know promoting extreme anti-Islam sentiment actually threatens France's national security.

Because France actually does

have a very large

Muslim population in it,

look what happened with the Paris riots.

The French government doesn't want

anti-Muslim sentiment to be very widespread because it causes instability within French society.

So now I'm not talking about what position's good, what's bad. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying there's a pattern here that every position he has for some reason aligns with the interests of the French government and the French state. Now, can I be honest with you guys?

I don't even watch Candice.

I don't watch Nick Fuentes.

I don't watch anyone.

Why does Candice think that what's the motive for France wanting to kill Charlie Kirk, according to Candice?

Does anyone know that?

Just changing the rush of... No. No. But

my working theory is that Europe is the one who got fucked over

the most by the sanctions

against Russia. I wonder

if in private,

European elites

in France, Germany

and so on, actually

did resent the pro-Ukraine

war push.

And we're just doing it to fulfill America's interests.

Which doesn't make a ton of sense because you'd think they would be lining up jumping for joy now that Trump got elected.

But it is also possible that once the sanctions

took effect and they adjusted to the new reality, it basically required them to like completely

reorient and change their strategy and just ride or die with it like it's too late at that point because you know one thing trump says that is true in a way right is that germany seems to be so hostile against Russia, but Nord Stream one and two were for Germany.

It was to the benefit of German industry more than anyone.

I mean, that actually materially and economically benefited Europe.

Why did Germany want such an aggressive, you know, politically speaking, politically aggressive stance against Russia and strengthening NATO when they were making themselves so dependent on Russian energy.

Well, because it seems like there's probably a contradiction between the outward orientation of the European, you know, the EU hegemon's and the private, you know, internal interests of the elites over there.

So these are just, this is all just food for thought. I'm not necessarily saying I know

the exact

conclusion

we should take here. But

yeah,

it's an interesting pattern

now I'll eat my words

if he ever actually meaningfully takes a position

that contradicts the interests of the French state

in any way

but I've never seen that.

I would even say that the, like even the nominal, relative anti-Israel sentiment he expresses seems to be in line with French interests.

And then here's another thing.

Why does nobody point out the historical tension between American neoconservatives, a lot of whom are Jewish, by the way, and the French state.

Like, the invasion of Iraq, France was not on board with that.

You guys know that whole thing about freedom fries when at one point we changed the name of

French fries to freedom fries. It was because France

wasn't on board with the invasion of Iraq.

And France actually

enjoyed some pretty good

relations with Saddam Hussein.

Right?

So France, I'm not saying france is anti-israel i'm saying france is anti lacude france is anti a specific faction of zionism in israel um the The one that is the most influential

in the Republican Party of the...

There's so many other factions of Zionism, though.

There's, yeah, there's Jay Street.

There's liberal Zionists.

There's all sorts of Zionists

that are aligned with France, you know,

and whatever.

The French Rothschilds or whatever, right?

Is my mic actually off right now?

No.

No, it's going through.

All right, so... no no it's going through all right so that's my working theory take it or leave it i feel like the public deserves to have this hypothesis okay if i'm a Russian agent, which is, it's like the most retarded theory, by the way.

If anything, you should say I'm a pro-Russia LARPA.

You should say I'm a Russian LARPA.

You should say I'm a fan larper you should say I'm a fan

I'm a fan of Putin

yeah this guy who wears

an Oshanka hat with a red star

and likes AK-47s and calls

himself a tankie and just loves Russia.

It's like a wee-a-boo for Russia, basically.

He's actually a Russian agent.

Oh, my God.

What a genius.

Like, yeah, that's who the Russian agents are.

The Russian agents are like these overt fans of russia and not like you know some some guy who what I don't know?

Huh, what would a Russian agent look like or do?

I don't know, some guy in a fucking track suit

at a gym somewhere

who's, uh, you know, who's, who's doing

MMA or boxing or some shit. that's that like why would it be me

it's so fucking stupid why would it be like the actual guy who's like pretty clearly like a big

fan of russia right? Which I am.

And it's precisely for that reason that Russia would never even consider me as an agent for anything.

If Russia wanted to use someone for clandestine activity to shape and influence

the U.S., they would

not look at a person like me.

They would look at somebody

who doesn't have

any, like, apparent pro-Russia

biases. I have pro-Russia

biases. Very clear biases. I have pro-Russia biases.

I have very clear and overt

pro-Russia biases, which I do not

hide from the public.

Therefore, I would be useless

for any Russian government

operations to influence the public

because like why the fuck

would they choose me, right?

That's just like stupid.

It's like, it's kind of like too obvious

or something.

It's like stupid.

Like, why would, why would it be me like yeah this

fucking guy who looks you're like ambiguously urasian who like just very russian coded already in a lot of ways.

Like Richard Spencer thought I was Russian.

When I debated Richard Spencer back in the day, back in 2022, when I debated Richard Spencer, this guy was like, I loved it.

It was the most funny part.

He was like, the whole time, he was like, I understand this is in your interests and your

people's interests.

But Ivan, listen

I'm like dude, I'm a brown

Lebanese larper. Why are you

what? I'm so

flattered you think I what? I look Russian

but I'm literally just a fan

I'm a kebab stand

owner. I'm a fan of Russia. I'm not a fan. I'm a kebab stand owner. I'm not a fan of

Russia. I'm not a Russian.

I'm just a kebab stand owner who

loves Putin. I'm a kebob stand owner

who's got a photo of Putin.

Right? Anyway.

So yeah, guys. right anyway uh so yeah guys by the way y'all by the way y'all like y'all know i'm built like this y'all know I'm wide as fuck.

Look at that.

It's a work of art.

See, this is, I don't get a lot of opportunities to admire

my gains, everybody. I'm

look-smaxing. I'm following

the trend of TikTok, right?

I smash my bones with a hammer, and this is how I look like this.

You want to look like me.

You have to take a hammer.

You have to smash yourself with a hammer.

And... with a hammer and eventually you'll get there.

Microfractions, right?

Anyway, because that's the new meta on kick apparently right

so here we are

um

and um

there's something I have to announce as well

at King of Zulu type shit

something I have to announce

I watched the new Five Nights at Freddy's

I did last night I watched the new Five Nights at Freddy's.

I did last night.

I watched it last night.

Did anyone force me to do that?

No. Did I have to do it? No.

Did I have a good reason for doing it?

Not really. But I did. And it was terrible. It was just awful. And I have no one to blame but myself because nobody made me do that.

It's not like I had a reason to.

I was just kind of,

because I watched the first one

and I wanted to watch

the second one.

And I was like

by myself in the theater.

There was like nobody there.

Um,

because it was so late.

And that's, that was good.

So it didn't smell.

But the whole time I was there, I was just kind of thinking to myself, why am I here?

You know?

I was like, why am I here? What am I doing here? You know? I was like, why am I here?

What am I doing here?

And then I would think more in deep contemplation.

You know, I would think, I would think to myself,

I got to be with the culture.

I got to be in with the times.

So anytime somebody says I'm too foreign,

I'm not American enough, right?

Well, did you see five nights at Freddy's too? That's what I thought American enough. All right. Well, did you see Five Nights at Freddy's too?

That's what I thought,

bitch.

So shut the fuck up.

I'm as American as they come.

I'm a true American.

Anytime there's a new cultural trend

or a popular thing,

I want to know what it's all about i want to know what's going on i don't want to be left behind okay and uh okay so i watch that And, you know, there's

Actually, there's something I want to talk about

Like on some real shit.

I want to talk about pluribus

Because I have been watching pluribus.

And I want to talk,

there's been a whole discourse about pluribus and communism.

I've been itching to talk about it, right?

And y'all better clip this shit and make it pretty and stuff, right?

So let's talk about pluribus, okay?

Pluribus, if you don't know know I'll give you the synopsis

which is all you have to know

in order to follow

what I'm about to say and how it's related

to communism and questions

of Marxism and all these kind of things

so the synopsis

of pluribus is that an alien signal was discovered by satellites,

which was like a Morse code or some, it was like a repeating frequency, something like that.

They translated the frequency and it turned out to be an MRNA like code for some kind of chemical

genetic, I don't know, some RNA pattern, okay? So they engineered the RNA pattern and they started experimenting with it.

They started injecting animals with it, whatever, nothing really happened.

But then one person accidentally gets injected with this virus, this virus that is a synthetic product of creating a chemical compound that was

you know being transmitted from outer space so okay so uh someone uh you, gets infected with it.

First thing they do, and it appears involuntary, is they infect others.

And then, so like, anytime somebody's getting infected with this shit, they're making it their categorical imperative, literally, to go and infect everyone, right, around them.

Then eventually, you know, it only takes one day or two days or something for the pretty much they're releasing it

in the sky

you know

they're infect the whole army

gets infected

and

they're speed running

infecting the planet

by like

through chem trails

and the water supply

and pretty much

there's no way to avoid

getting infected it's not like a

zombie movie where like there's some survivors no every single person was exposed to the virus

right but there's around 11 to 20 people worldwide who are just immune. They're just biologically immune. And there's a bunch of other people that just died because they couldn't handle it. But there is, I think there's like 6 or 7 billion people left, 1 billion died. And then there's 11 or 20 people or so who are just immune.

So what is the virus do? The virus basically creates a hive mind where there's a simultaneous everyone is simultaneously

experiencing everything at once

so let's say I'm here

and you're in France

everything you experience I experience

we share one mind we have one

thinking consciousness and I'm you and you are me. So if I'm talking to someone like here right in front of me in America, you know, if you're in India or if you're in China, if you're anywhere in the world if you're in china if you're anywhere in the world you're also

talking to them so it's a we it's a this is the pluribus it's like we right so everybody

just becomes part of one collective hive mind.

Yeah, there's some things, there's some minor details.

Just so you understand where the show is going with it.

The hive mind is incapable of harming people.

The hive mind seeks to do anything it can to make people happy it doesn't do harm it can't even kill plants so it can't even grow food all right it's incapable of

growing food because that would entail

harming life, right?

So every single one of the

non-infected

are served by 7 billion

people.

So if you, they'll do anything for you.

So there's, you know, if you say, hey, you know, get me this meal that I had 20 years ago, they'll get, they know everything.

They contain the whole collective consciousness and knowledge and experience of all humanity.

So they'll do it.

Instantly, they'll deliver it to you.

Say, hey, I want a Ferrari.

They'll fucking come with a helicopter and just drop it off.

There was like a famous scene where, you know, the, the main character, Carol, she went to a

grocery store.

She's like, well, the grocery store is empty.

I want it filled.

So they all came in trucks and they filled it.

So.

And then there's a guy who's like, there's one, and yeah, they did think of this.

So there's just like this one guy from Maritania or something who's just living it up, I guess.

He's like fucking a bunch of women.

And he's getting like the most attractive women in the world.

And he's just like sleeping with all of them.

He's like living in a mansion.

He's enjoying like the most incredible luxuries in the world he's basically being worshipped

and everyone's just doing it because it's all it's nothing to them right so it's all so it's

it's it's it's it i found it actually a very interesting

you know,

kind of exploration of...

What is authority?

What does it mean to have authority?

And being this exception,

this point of exception, it's like where you are, this is what I find interesting.

The hive mind doesn't have a purpose. There's no purpose except subsistence. mind doesn't have a purpose there's no purpose except subsistence it doesn't have any tastes it doesn't have any preferences it doesn't have any notion of art it doesn't have any

notion of whatever so these remaining 11 or 20 people, they're giving the hive purpose.

Only by being abstracted from that is the possibility of purpose there. If you don't have that, there's no purpose anymore, right? So this is something very interesting to think about when it comes to the master slave dialectic, you know? There's probably a lot more I could say on that, but that's like one of the things that I kind of got me thinking the most when it came to that and then another thing that I find pretty interesting actually is let's think about for one second, right?

Let's think about this.

My thesis, when it comes to pluribus, is that we don't have to ask what if

this is what the show kind of gets wrong

it's not a matter of what if

all we have to do

is take away the dimension

of simultaneous collective experience and that's already human nature

that's already humanity humanity is already the pluribus hive mind.

Lacan calls this hive mind the big other.

And even if you don't believe it exists, our subjectivity could not form without reference to it without reference to a hive mind without a

reference to a they a big other was society the state the law whatever the big trend you know the big

thing so there's something about human individual

subjectivity that is inexorably related to a pluribus already and the only thing that separates us from the show's pluribus is we don't have simultaneous collective experience, meaning if I experience something, I have to communicate it to you, and that is a temporal process. I have to materially find a way to transmit information to you.

So there's no free flow of information.

Every expenditure of information and communication takes energy, it takes effort, and it's temporal. It takes a certain amount of time

for me to talk to someone who's in India or China. The internet is instantaneous, sure, but even

that takes a millisecond or so, right? Moreover, I have to communicate.

So when you think about what is the object of the communication, are we just communicating

our experiences?

No, we are communicating, we are communicating distinct relationships to the same pluribus, to the same big other or symbolic order, right, as LaConn would call it.

Well, the big other and the symbolic order are not the same per se

but the big other is the imaginary form of the symbolic order right so to that extent they're related

anyway i don't want to get into the laconian stuff but we are all humanity is already a pluribus

you know that's something very important to think about the subject of our existence is an

irreducibly exterior being.

I wouldn't even call it a collective being.

It's something more than collective.

Collective implies

this is also what the show gets wrong.

If there's a pluribus, it's not many people.

For there to be a pluribus, there have to be distinct individuals.

But there are no distinct individuals.

There is one being, one thinking consciousness,

which is able to simultaneously experience things across the planet.

But that's just like a spider with a million different eyes, right?

So that's something the show fucks up with and gets wrong.

And I think the reason it does is because it's not immediately clear what makes us distinct as individuals.

But I think I have the answer to that.

You know, the answer to that is that we are, every individual is the concrete particular of the pluribus that's all we are we could not exist

meaningfully we cannot even be i would even say we wouldn't not even physically right we cannot be said to exist

without reference to this other thing we are the concrete particular realization of a much bigger being. That's all we are. We are what it looks like when it has to

descend into time and space and acquire physical concreteness.

That's all an individual is.

Every single individual is an instantiation of this bigger thing, right?

Which is not even just a collective being because a collective being is a is a of the many it's this is not a thing of the many this is a thing that pre-existent

individuation itself right and um our consciousness is individual and irreducible not because it is a product of us we are not the

authors of our selfhood in a in a in a sense of a a master we don't decide and choose what we become

because of something in us mo we absolutely are we have no authority over ourselves in that sense right but our individuality is a

tragedy in a sense you could see it as a tragedy it's a tragic product of this let's call it third exterior thing right this social being, but even that is a problematic term, having to acquire

flesh and blood and bone, and deal with that, and deal with the consequences of being think about that for a second like

this is what marks literally meant by species being by the way species being wasn't in a

zoological notion the species was a uh in the question of it was a it was a reference within hegel's logic to the

particular so it's kind of a particular universality is basically what it means.

When the universal, let's say, or the Hegel's thinking spirit, if you want, right,

when that has to acquire being, and it actually has to be something,

that is a kind of tragic dimension.

Because then at this point, it acquires finitude.

Human beings don't live forever.

You know, we live maybe for 90 years if we're super, super lucky, right?

We don't live forever.

We're absolutely mortal.

We have these conditions of being, right?

Which in no way we have control over.

Our physical existence, for one, we have to eat.

We have to defecate. We have to, you know, we're sexed, okay?

Which means every human being is either a man or a woman.

And, um, we're, like our subjectivity is irrevocably or i should say um what's the word for like it's impossible to unavoidably

polarized in either direction

which means

like men

yeah there's exceptions to everything

but you get the idea of men

their being is oriented toward women and vice versa right so that's what i mean by polarized

and that that's actually like the the origin of where human beings come from. So what a surprise.

But anyway,

um,

yeah,

so this is something interesting to think about, right?

Because, uh, interesting to think about, right? Because when most people think about individuality,

they're thinking about, well, you were born, you know, you're this unique person and your uniqueness is yours. But our

uniqueness is not ours. Our uniqueness is precisely a uniqueness that is a consequence of a tragedy

within the, you know, the universal, so to speak.

The identity of the universal in the particular or the concrete universal, I should rather say, right?

That is a kind of tragedy. That's not something that is like, oh, well, you know, somebody's just born and so their entire personality. It's also like the question of the whole nature

nurture debate. Most people get it terribly fucking wrong.

It's not nature. It's not nurture. It's not both either. It's a secret third thing. It's a completely different thing. It's a tragic product of something intangible acquiring tangibility, you know, something virtual acquiring actual and and you have to think about it in a kind of state of opposing tensions there's no static being there's no static identity there's only this deadlock

of opposing tensions

that makes every particular thing

determine it and real

right

so pluribus

if pluribus

explored more the reality of this pluribus explored more the reality of this pluribus thing, it would come full circle and just that's already what humanity is. It's basically my my thesis regarding that show. That's already what humanity is.

The show is just not thinking about

the consequences enough.

The minute we would have to, if you take away

the telepathy and the instantaneous free flow of information, we're already there.

There is no human sub.

There's no individual subject.

Individual subjectivity is a lie lie that's the tragedy of human

existence we are not the subject of our existence to whatever extent we are individual we are a

tragic byproduct of some other kind of subjective self-referentiality, which we are a byproduct of the impossibility.

We're a byproduct.

Put it this way.

The individual is not the product of a true ontological selfhood.

The individual is the product of some other kind of subjective self-relation that fails that is impossible to fulfill and out of this tragedy arises the individual. That's what an individual is. You can also rethink

theology or Christianity in this way. What does it mean that we were fallen from grace? What does it mean that we were fallen from grace?

What does it mean that we fell from paradise and we ate the apple of knowledge and we had to be redeemed of our sins and so on and so on?

Well, this is kind of up the alley of what we're talking about here right um so yeah how does how to distinguish between and retaining the idea of false consciousness?

That's much more complex to get into, but one of the other things I want to litigate, which I think a lot of people just take for granted.

I've been talking to Carlos about this, and I've been thinking about it a lot.

Did you know, in original German, in the original German, the

word, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, um,

term class consciousness

is nowhere to be found in Marx or Engels.

Never do they speak of a class consciousness.

Now, later,

the term started to be

used more, but it really

is a seminal concept

within Marxism because

of Lukacs, who pulled it

out of, well, I'm not going to say he pulled it out of his ass but it is it bears

the markings of lucoxes non-marxist non-materialist uh deviations right lucox basically invents the modern concept of marxist class consciousness

it didn't actually exist in classical marxism uh they had that term. They never used that term. Did they speak of the working class acquiring correct consciousness? True consciousness? Yes. Did they speak of the proletariat acquiring a revolutionary consciousness yes but never this specific notion of class consciousness and to give you the basic rundown of my mistrust of this term and why I think we should move past it is proletarian consciousness is supposed to be just the correct true consciousness.

It's correct, ontologically correct, right?

It's correct with respect to the entire...

Now, you, okay, I mean, people who are pushing...

Well, the proletariat does stand for the

universal truth of all society.

Yeah, I understand that.

I understand even

Loucox would make that argument.

But the problem is that

the the that the

the problem with this notion

is that

it more or less

does not

fully address the question of what actually is the true object of the consciousness.

Is it consciousness of the class, or is it consciousness of a more fundamental revolutionary

transformation already going on within society? consciousness of a more fundamental revolutionary transformation

already going on within society.

Right?

And

I think this is how

we avoid the stupid trappings

of the, you know know the methodological individualism

when it comes to Marxism that it that we see in the West like who is the subject of revolution

who is the revolutionary subject these questions did not plague marks and angles

the way they plague us marks and angles never had to even think about well marks okay I think in the 18th Premier, kind of touches on it.

But it was no headache for them to reconcile the fact that they were of the revolutionary

disposition and had a revolutionary consciousness, despite not

personally being proletarians.

That never bothered them, and Lenin also, I mean, Lenin had to kind of clarify some confusion

surrounding that.

But they

kind of didn't. I mean, Marx,

he wrote about how

you know,

the representatives of the Petit

bourgeoisie in the French parliament, I think it was. I don't exactly remember the details. He said, they may not themselves be personally, you know, shopkeepers or whatever, but they can go no farther within their consciousness than can the petty bourgeoisie

in their actual life? So to this

extent they represent that class.

So you can represent the interests

of classes without being part of those classes

on a personal level, right?

So, yeah, I mean, Marx kind of brieflyingly addressed that paradox.

But the problem is class consciousness, the way that it's used often from lucox it implies that individually

existing as a proletarian somehow will

already gives you the object of consciousness

which

which is true if we're talking about something beyond what Lukaks would be permitting us to talk about.

We're talking about a more fundamental kind of material relationship to production that is pre-ideational, pre-conscious, pre-theoretical, a type of pre-theoretical disposition, it would be correct.

But Lukacs can't really entertain this notion of a kind of pre-rational, pre-theoretical, material disposition.

So this is why he has to say it's automatically a false consciousness.

The absence of proletarian consciousness is not necessarily false consciousness and it because there is a pre-theoretical pre-political and in some in the sense of rational that, you know, is accepted in, in modern thinking, free rational disposition that a material relationship to production can open you toward, can determine you with.

And this dimension of the pre-theoretical, pre-conceptual disposition, you have to start maybe talking about Heidegger. You can't, it's a non-starter

to begin with the premise that the consciousness of every single human being necessarily implies a specific conceptual relationship to the world,

and that the absence of the Marxist kind automatically entails you have a false one. That neglects the fact that Marxistist consciousness is supposed to confirm clarify and um make sense of

something some type of experience that precedes uh thought activity, right? And this is why, to put it shortly,

guys, this is why oftentimes leftists, and I'll tell you why this is so important concretely,

because oftentimes leftists

when they're talking to workers

are making assumptions.

Oh, you happen to have

this type of consciousness. Oh,

you happen to subscribe to this

ideology. Oh, you're a

fascist. Oh, instead of being a Marxist, you're a fascist.

Oh, instead of being a Marxist, you're a right-winger.

Or instead of being a Marxist, you're a Soctem.

They're presupposing that ordinary people already have this comprehensive type of consciousness and theoretical outlook and conceptual framework and kind of nailing them to that cross just because they haven't arrived at the correct one.

And the problem with that approach is that you don't, by default, have an ideology or a theory of the world. By default, you have experiences and sensibilities and immediate kind of practical ways of making sense of those according to your everyday life.

But you don't automatically have an ideology.

And this is why I am also against Al Thusser and a lot of the other kind of, you know, this notion, oh, even if you don't, you know, you have an ideology, even if you don't know you have one.

And it's like, look, that's not an ideology.

That could very well

just be referring to a pre-theoretical,

pre-conceptual

material

kind of state of being,

okay?

Which we cannot impose qualities on. Okay, we have to respect that dimension

because if we don't, then we end up being hypocrites ourselves, because we too interface with this pre-theoretical

pre-conceptual

you know dimension of existence

and what's my proof well look at all the ways

people are twisting and distorting Marxism

in self-serving ways to confirm their biases, to confirm their particular conditions of life,

digital furry artists who think that they're the subject of Marxist theory.

It's a quintessential example of what I'm talking about here. They have this pre-theoretical,

material interest, which they're using Marxism to justify and confirm.

But they're not acknowledging the fact that there's this pre-conceptual, pre-theoretical disposition that they have. They're just saying, I arrived at the correct consciousness,

and that truck driver didn't, so he's a fascist and i'm a marxist

and therefore i'm superior right and it's like no people don't automatically have a comprehensive

consciousness of the world people very much do dwell and meander in in between states

of the subconscious and consciousness and the you cannot rationally make sense of that on the terms of ideology or ideology alone.

You have to make sense of it in terms of what it means for their material existence and that material existence

is something pre-theoretical and pre-conceptual for them

not everybody has a theory of what the world should be and what the world is and what the world must be

because not everybody has a direct conscious relationship to the world as an object

uh and this is what leftists don't fucking understand.

They're imposing assumptions upon people.

Do you have false consciousness?

Do you have class consciousness?

When the truth is, sometimes people have no consciousness

sometimes people have an undefined consciousness their material existence is certainly

defined but their consciousness is not always defined and let's remember something

in light of the experience of history, which is absolutely a justified conclusion to draw, by the way.

The majority of people are not going to be active political subjects. And there's nothing wrong with that. The majority of people,

including the majority of proletarians, are not going to make the object of their life activity,

you know, serving the universal interests of society.

For better or for worse, this is the truth about human nature.

And I know it's funny to

use that term. I'm using

it to trigger all the right people, though.

For better or for worse, it's true

that at any

given point in human, including

in the higher stage of communism,

most human beings will be concerned with their immediate existence before anything else.

The selfless people whose object of consciousness happens to be the entirety of society those are the leaders those are the people that rule those are the people that are hierarchically higher or at least should be higher

on the latter. The reason

there's inevitably hierarchy

in human society

is because most human

beings are self-interested.

They're interested

only in themselves, their families first, and that's it. And you know what?

There's nothing wrong with that. There's actually nothing wrong with that. That's not because they're

inherently selfish or they're not inherently social beings. It's because

the energy that it takes

to expend to be aware

of your social existence

on an everyday level

is very high. Most

people will not have the time

to comprehensively master knowledge of the entirety of their social existence. They will just deal with what's in front of them. Now, the more free time people have, the more of a chance they have to learn the more of a chance they have

to ascend you know the the the hierarchy of communism which absolutely there will be and concern

themselves with higher questions which are invariably questions of art

questions of science that's what it means to think selflessly beyond just your immediate

self-interest you can start to think about higher questions.

But the majority of people will be first and foremost concerned with their immediate existence.

And you know what? That's every human being. Because even the Marxist intelligentsia who have the free time to devote

all of their activity to thinking about communism to thinking about Marxism to thinking about

society to thinking about political economy, or critiquing it

like Marxists, they rely on the labor of people serving their own subsisting. Of course they do.

Most Marxists in history were not working in factories. Therefore, and ergo they were depending upon

the majority of society, concerning itself with its people concerning themselves with their own

interests first. That's natural for human beings. It's not inherently selfish.

It's true for everyone. Before Marx could write capital, he had to feed himself. He had to eat. He had to drink. He had to have shelter. He was not doing the labor that went in to, and there's nothing wrong with that, by the way. But do you understand how it's not, just because 90% of humanity at a given time will be

selfish doesn't mean they're bad it doesn't mean they're less moral even because it's all of us

all of us have this bedrock this fundamental bedrock of having to attend to our physical existence before anything, including the leaders on the hierarchy who devote themselves to questions of selflessness.

So the communist view doesn't say hierarchy is wrong and there won't be hierarchy.

But it also doesn't condemn morally.

It doesn't condemn the masses for being lower on the hierarchy.

It's a completely understandable fact that most

human beings

will have to concern themselves

with the immediate. But by

concerning themselves with the immediate,

they're actually contributing

to the long term, to the thing that scales up as giving society the necessary

free time it needs to contemplate bigger and better questions about life and nature and all this kind of stuff, right?

So, yeah, I mean, that's...

That's a huge part of what I'm talking about here.

For sure.

Um... The, you know what?

And the communist outlook, by the way, wants free time.

It wants to encourage free time. But it also wants to give people time to just maybe just do nothing. You know, that's

another thing that's important, I think, irreducibly as human beings. It's a communist principle that we want free time but it's also a communist principle we're not

necessarily going to dictate what the masses do with their free time we can we certainly need to

open doors we certainly need to encourage them we certainly need to open doors. We certainly need to encourage them.

We certainly need to make it accessible and incentivize, you know,

exploring higher questions and using their free time to put to work for the benefit of all.

But some people just want to use their free time to fart around

to walk around the park and fart a bunch on the flowers that's okay there's nothing wrong with that

give people there's you know what please somebody who knows about hinduism confirm this to me because i'm

almost 100% sure that the hindu notion of the the hierarchical hierarchy of the cosmos right accounts

for this.

There's a dimension, a foundation,

a kind of bedrock of all society and existence itself,

which demands waste.

It demands this kind of meandering between,

I'm going to do something productive,

I'm going to do nothing at all,

I'm just going to fart around

and literally do nothing of any value or importance.

And this creates a kind of openness with respect to different outcomes that is necessary, actually.

Like if everyone was constantly living purposefully and doing purposeful things with their actions,

that means that there would only be one outcome of existence.

But evidently and clearly there's not. There are multiple possibilities with respect to what existence can be or can become, evidently so, I guess, right?

And since this is the case,

the idleness and wastefulness of people also corresponds in some sense ontologically to the multiplicity of different possible outcomes and manifestations of purpose.

Does anyone understand what I'm fucking talking about? You know, there needs to be a way to acknowledge in some sense that nothing ever actually is.

Everything that is has to be.

And in order to be,

it actually has to...

Um... exist in ways that

that contradict the is

it has to kind of manifest and take form and concretize and just by doing this just by let's even call it appearing something that is submits to something contrary to what it is, right?

And this is like really complex.

People don't understand it.

They think it's just mystical gibberish.

But you have to really fucking think about it.

If something truly is and and acquires concrete being

it has to partake in something that is contrary to that initial instance right uh being because being is suspended in becoming right

it has to be suspended in becoming nothing can just be without paying the price for being and paying the price for being means becoming

something other than what you already are right uh So, yeah.

Yeah.

And, um... You know, this is honestly sometimes i'll be writing something and i can write anything fast

now i could write 10 books in one month.

And no, no problem, no problem.

If I was a grifter, by the way, that's what I'd be fucking doing.

I'd be just speed typing a bunch of fucking books and releasing them. And I would be an acclaimed author but why do I write so

slowly I write so slowly because it's very easy to miss miss things

you be writing

and before you want to conclude

you want to make sure you're not missing

something fundamental

and so

when you protract it you know instead of just following a constant logical sequence of this therefore that this for that sometimes you have to step back from that sequence you have to subject that to a type of scrutiny that takes longer right and you have to you have to think about it dialectically not not in a bullshit way, as in what does that actually imply in its totality? What are the other consequences and implications of this, if true? How does that relate to everything else, right?

So... relate to everything else right so sometimes i'll procrastinate a writing like very purposefully, you know,

you're just sitting there looking at it and you're like, I don't,

I'm in tunnel vision right now,

I want to take my mind off of this

because I'm in tunnel vision.

And if this tunnel is completed it's shit

I need to get out of this fucking tunnel

you know

um you know Lucas I could fucking do that

I could do that

I could do that like I really could

I'm not even fucking kidding

like I could grift

off any

fucking novel you could think I could I could grift off any fucking novel you could think.

I could...

The one thing I probably couldn't write is like Lord of the Rings type of shit.

I could not do fantasy.

I don't have patience for it.

I couldn't do a world building

book.

Maybe I could... No, I couldn't.

Because I wouldn't... There's

too much details I'd want to exhaust.

I couldn't create a world.

I couldn't do exhaust. I couldn't create a world. I couldn't do fantasy. I couldn't, I could not tell a story. I couldn't write fiction. I could not write fiction. Um, um um because in a way

romance novels

um

i feel like that's so easy to write

that's so easy to write.

That's so easy to write because if you're a true pervert,

you already know what it's about.

So you just have to kind of dance around what it's actually about a bunch,

and that's it. Like, it's super about a bunch, and that's it.

Like, it's super easy.

You already know the object.

If you already know the object, it's super easy.

The problem with writing fiction is that it's not always easy to know what's the fucking point of this.

What's the object?

I think too much about what point am I trying to say.

When it comes... By the way, I don't even read fiction books because it's fucking boring to me.

Because it's like...

People want too many different things to say,

and I don't care.

Sometimes they'll sprinkle in some wisdom

or insight here or there,

but I don't need that in a

fucking fiction book I would prefer

the point

get to the point

illustrate to me the point

I like movies more because

they can illustrate to me the point much more

compellingly I get the point much more compellingly.

I get the point of a movie.

The point of a book

is just so dragged on

fiction book.

It's so dragged on.

And fuck anyone who says, oh,

you know you no

I'm sorry

the Dune movie is better

than the fucking book

I understand the point

of what that guy was trying to say

through the movie

much better than I could through the book by watching the movie much better than I could

through the book.

By watching the movie,

I can think about

a lot of different things

you could write about

and whatever.

That's okay.

I get the point

in the fucking movie.

The book

has all these nuances.

Oh,

there's so much more room for imagination.

Yeah, but I can think about how to make a movie differently as well.

I could think about what this would look like in a million different ways.

I could think about what this could mean in a million different ways.

But by getting the point illustrated

to me in a fucking movie, that's communicated to me, like, in a much more expedient way than having

to fucking read some guy just fucking drone

on endlessly about all

these different things like we get it dude

you thought about this in a lot of different ways

I can do that too if I just

understood the point you were trying to make

I could write your fucking book for you

right movies speed run this is what this

motherfucker was trying to say this is the point i want to get to the point a lot of philosophies

in the form of fiction.

Theory fiction is actually very easy for me

to write.

Theory fiction, yeah. Theory fiction is easy to write

for sure, for me.

I mean, are you you kidding i could just illustrate a theoretical point or a philosophical point without even having to care about empirical reality that's beautiful

to me i love that um Theory fiction's great.

I love theory fiction.

But, you know.

Actually, my main book,

my magnum opus,

if I'm calling it that at this point,

is kind of theory

fiction.

With a,

it's a,

it's,

it's,

commentary on

history. It's a commentary on history that takes fictional liberties, if you will, right?

So there's kind of actually some fiction there in a way.

But I don't see it as fiction.

Yeah, it's literally about Tartaria.

That's the most hilarious thing when my book comes out.

It's going to make sense of all of my schizophrenic like memes and shit

like oh that's why you were talking about

Tartaria that's why you were fucking

talking about building fire

temples on the fucking Rocky Mountains

and shit oh I get it now

I'm in...

I kind of want the memes to just take off and work, so you can just...

So I don't feel pressure to make sense of them, right?

Um, so yeah.

Is it related to Zoroastrianism?

Yes, like explicitly so, yes.

So, yeah. I don't put your hopes up too much in terms of when or I don't know guys because you know what my fucking problem is

the need to continually

maintain relevancy

is a problem

the need to continually

just be out here

that's my fucking number one option need to continually just be out here.

That's my fucking number one obstacle.

Because I know for a fact,

if I go dark and do this,

first of all, I can't go dark because I'm chairman of the fucking party

but if I went dark

and wrote this book

and I

who knows how long it would take

by the time it gets released

um nobody would give a fuck I would not time it gets released um

nobody would give a fuck

i would not be

this that's the problem if you get a degree at a university

you can always be relevant

because you'll always have oh you got a degree

you for me i have to maintain this shit

you know I can't rest on the laurels

of a fucking

institutional accredation

or whatever right

so yeah

that's the truth

like anybody

can just fucking write anything

you know that's the truth Vlog. I got literally, I don't need to write.

I literally, I'll make up a story tonight.

20 subs, I'll give you a short story right off the top of my fucking head.

I'll literally tell the story right now, off the top of my head.

What the hell, Wade? That was way too fast.

Wade with the 15, bro, thank you.

Shout out Wade, thank you.

That was very quick.

You all want to bedtime store? You want to You all

You all

You want to hear a story?

I could tell a story

By way

No of my stories

Are totally fiction

So I can tell you a story

I can tell you a dark story

i love telling stories i could do that

i don't i don't got to write anything

i'll tell you a story

but it's not free

that's the problem That's the problem.

That's the problem with everything.

Nothing is free.

Just like the Republican Party.

Just like Prager You says, nothing is free.

How true is that?

Nothing is free.

Nothing is free.

What's free nothing no one

no one four, three, two, one, up below.

I'm actually thinking about it in my head, which, uh, Denver, what's up, bro, appreciate.

Yo, it's Trail Stanley, wow, you wanna hear about, all right, okay, okay, okay, okay.

Let's gather around the campfire, folks.

I said, you know, I should have a stream setup or a setting to start telling stories and shit. B. Oh, we're good.

All right.

I told SJP, University of Houston Houston to check out ACP.

They told me it's a Strasserite.

What fuck is teaching these people what Strasseright means?

Bro.

And called you and I...

Bro, can you like document this shit shit document this and tell us about it's

for real no i want him to follow up on that fucking follow up how the fuck are we a strasser right

party follow up on the connection between ACP and Otto

Strasser's ideas.

No, no, follow up on that, you fucking

retard. Shut the fuck. I'm

pissed that there's a fucking LARPA

who made that reference. I'm actually

pissed someone like, thought

they were being smart by saying, like, no, let's follow up on that.

What actually are you fucking talking about?

Strasserite, really?

Shut the fuck up, you fucking retard.

You actual retard.

No, Haas is just faking being a Marxist. you actual retard No

Haas is just faking being a Marxist

Do I

Some guys do I

Can we go on the infrared archive

Just how many times do I reference

The writings of Marx and Lenin

Like off the top of my head,

just like all the fucking time.

Didn't I just cite something very specific

from the 18th Brumeir?

I think it was from the 18th Brewery.

It could have been from something else.

Civil War in France, maybe.

I don't know.

I'm faking it, and I'm actually a follow of Otto Strasser.

I've literally never read a fucking word of Otto Strasser and never will.

Isn't that the guy who is part of the LGBT wing of the Nazi party,

by the way? Or that's Ernest Rom. But he was part of Ernest Rom's faction, right?

So how would that even make sense?

All right. so how would that even make sense all right anyway

um Strasser is what you call. By the way, you only talk about Strasser.

Strasser was a dupe.

He wasn't a dupe,

but his followers were dupes.

Because the Nazis were promising

a lot of workers,

a lot of different things.

Turned out all to be lies.

So to say that

where Strasserites implies there's, like, what does that even mean?

What's the analogy here?

Oh, you're economically left wing, but socially conservative.

Oh, so was Stalin a Strasser right? You fucking retard.

Amalgam communism appeals to the culture war, not class war. Was that SJP students for justice

for Palestine that was saying that

kind of seems like out of bounds.

Like what do you mean we are appealing to the culture war?

Why would the students for justice in Palestine

have a problem with our

I'll go to a fucking mosque

in Houston and let's see

whose views are more culturally conservative

mine or the imam of that mosque

and then call him a fucking strassarite you bitch

fucking retard and then call him a fucking Strasserite, you bitch.

Fucking retard. Okay, I'll go to the fucking Moserite. Strasser.

Okay, I'll go to the fucking Houston

Mosque and compare my social views

to the Imam

and we'll see who's more conservative.

No, they won't because it's

SJP. It's students for justice for Palestine.

There's not a single fucking Arab in there

who's raised traditionally?

Are you fucking kidding?

They're all fucking white liberals in there?

There's not a single ARAB in that organization

who was raised traditionally.

Really?

Who the fuck traditionally? Really?

Who the fuck are these people?

Anyway, I'm not going to get into it.

I'm here to tell a story. Lebanon Libyanptards.

I mean, even Lebanon

Libtards can't excommunicate

their whole fucking family.

And I'm getting distracted because I'm trying to think about the best story I want to tell tonight.

Stories I've wanted to tell. Stories I've wanted to tell.

Okay.

Have I told the story about the intelligence agencies,

discovering something ancient? Have I told these stories I told that one before I think I might have

yeah someone saying I have then might have. Yeah.

Someone's saying I have, then I have.

Okay.

There's so much to draw from and think about. I'd really need to get into it.

Hmm.

Hmm. Hmm. You know, Iron, what's up, bro, appreciate you.

Yeah, the code breaking. I've told the story then

I've told the story

can't go down that route

because I've already told the story

unfortunately

kind of feel like I'm under the spotlight

you know, but I've...

Let me think.

Let me think, let me think, let me think.

Hmm. You know, romance novel Romance novel.

No. Thank you.

I didn't see the tenant. I never saw tenant. So I don't know what you're talking about. Russian guy and tenant. I don't even know what that is. Fortunately. Oh, came from the future destroy the present.

That sounds so cool.

That sounds so cool. That sounds very cool. Um, I don't like to tell stories that are totally made up. I like to sprinkle bits of truth

in them, you know? That's why it's kind of difficult for me to think of the deck of cards.

I want to pull from here.

I'm not just going to make something up, like, talking out of my ass,

or I'm not just going to, like, make some shit up. Hmm. I should, All right.

Hmm.

I should tell you about what happened in Finland.

Should I tell you about that?

Should I tell you about the story of Helsinki Airport, 1976.

I don't know.

I don't know. Hmm All right

Well

It's kind of cringe

It's kind of cringe

Because no we

I'm not going to That one's too far feds No he's going to believe that one It's kind of cringe because nobody...

I'm not gonna...

That one's too far for that.

It's nobody's gonna believe that one.

Hmm. You know, Yeah, I know the story of Timbers Tomb. I already know that. but. all right i'll tell a story that's a little topical okay

topical story

that's what i'll do i'll tell a topical story that's what I'll do

I'll tell a topical story.

All right.

This one will be about the UFOs.

All right.

So, you know, just bear with me here.

Well, I'm about to tell you absolutely not true.

It's highly speculative, but it is

food for thought.

Now,

there are UFOs. I mean, they're real.

If we believe what the Pentagon is saying, if we believe with these whistleblower, it could be a sci-up for sure.

Apparently, there are aircraft that are just moving in ways that cannot be explained by pilots and by the U.S. military.

We don't know what they are.

We don't know how they're moving like that.

We don't know what they are, supposedly, right?

There's also all other kinds of anomalies you can start talking about.

But, you know, when the government is acknowledging it, I guess it makes it real, right?

Well, you know, a lot of people are asking the question about aliens and outer space, which is really retarded, actually.

Aliens are their aliens are probing our military capabilities.

Buddy, if aliens, if anything remotely close to an alien intelligence could visit Earth,

nobody's probing anyone's weapons.

They can probably just, like, from the three-body problem, part three,

they probably have, like, a physics weapon, like a card.

They just slide the card, and it blows up our whole planet,

all right?

It puts us in a black hole.

So let's not pretend like alien intelligence

would

you know

what we're gearing up

for a fucking battle

with aliens

it's not happening

okay

it's stupid

moreover the idea

that

you know an embodied intelligence would be acquiring knowledge by physically getting into vehicles and traveling the galaxy is fucking retarded.

By the time that you become sufficiently

advanced, the

notion that

your knowledge of

universal, of

the universe

would be like

when, and it's like

we're primitive

people like cavemen

where we can't

think beyond the

analogy of getting

on a fucking boat and we're just sailing across the stars with a fucking boat. It's not how it works. When you acquire true knowledge of the cosmos and true knowledge of the universe, by that time, you're not really that interested in visiting other planets, because

you already fucking know what everything is about. And to whatever extent, even if I would

entertain that you would be concerned or interested in influencing another planet or another

intelligent being, you would not do so humiliatingly as an embodied intelligence

traveling on a fucking airplane, okay? You're literally like some aliens sitting in a fucking plane.

That's fucking stupid.

Anyone who's thinking in these terms is a fucking retard, okay?

I don't take that seriously.

I'll never take it seriously, all right?

Anyway, but let me actually talk about some disturbing conclusions.

Okay, I already talked to you about the intelligence agencies intercepting encrypted messages with unknown, you know, actor-agent

network rationale, you know, it's not coming from other intelligence agencies.

It's not coming.

Who's who is sending these messages?

Why are these actors coordinating in these different types of ways?

Sending these kinds of very specific patterned forms of information.

There's a whole intelligence arms race to decipher and, you know, partake in this interception through cryptography these different messages eventually that leads

to the discovery of ancient orders and brotherhoods and organizations whose purpose and rationale seems to be much more compelling than whatever ideologies, major governments and countries, are selling their intelligence personnel, and everyone just starts being forced to take aside in these very ancient conflicts between these different secret orders,

whose purpose and whose scope and whose ability seems to outmatch whatever we have,

and that's really what I'm talking about.

You know, I'm kind of talking about.

It's kind of, you can think of this as a part two of that, right?

Now, what does it mean to distinguish yourself from the masses to acquire distinction and cultivation and mastery over the sciences and the arts?

Well, look, the truth is, every and the arts.

Well, look, the truth is, every intelligentsia,

every Renaissance man, every Da Vinci of history,

every cultivated, enlightened one,

speaking of enlightenment,

a lot of people don't think of this.

Every enlightened one in the world falls upon a humiliating

realization that they depend upon the masses.

In the same way

that data companies depend upon us.

They need data.

You can think about anything you want in your data. You can think about anything

you want in your head. You can

acquire any degree of enlightenment.

There's different levels to

enlightenment. You know, I mean, obviously

there are. The first step of

enlightenment includes

no longer

attaching your sense of truth

to what the masses

think. It's true for Marxists.

It's true for everyone in history.

Acquiring truth

means acquiring distinction from the

conventions and prejudices and ordinary consciousness of the majority of people.

You no longer...

And then oftentimes, this enters the dimension of secrecy.

It's no use trying to explain yourself to everyone in the world because most people are uninterested, their prejudice,

they're incentivized away from truth, and then cultivating and exploring the consequences

of enlightenment requires exclusion. It requires a degree of secrecy if in societies where these

conclusions are heretical and they're persecuted. Secret brotherhoods, secret orders, secret societies, you get the idea.

These are common throughout history.

Anyway,

humiliatingly, these

secret orders, whatever we're going to call them, depend upon the masses,

though, to test the application of whatever conclusions they're drawing. You engage in profound

scientific discoveries. You're no longer bounded by the conventions and prejudices you can start

getting to work you can start cultivating things that physically and you know ontologically even

we're not regarded as possible metaphysically, we're not regarded as possible.

Metaphysically, I should say, not regarded as possible.

But, in order for these things to scale...

Amila with the 10, what's up?

What do you want me to read? I can read it. I mean, I can read it if you're paying for it. That's what you're doing. Appreciate it with the 10. Let me, uh, you want me to read that a lot on stream or what? Just have me read it. Anyway, I'll finish this.

Amela, thank you so much.

So anyway, let me continue with the story.

So... Um, so, uh,

you don't know whether your theory, whether you're, whether you're products of knowledge, or the

scientific outcomes of your scientific process of discovery is actually true until it scales, until it's adopted by the masses,

and becomes a defining feature of society.

But the scale is probably one of the most important dimensions, a brotherhood of 300 people,

or even 50 people, right?

Will not truly know whether what they're discovering is worth anything until they can have it be applied at a mass scale.

And therefore, you know, encompass a much wider division of labor.

Because remember, the division of labor at the scale of society is the only reason as many people that exist now are able to survive.

It's a consequence of that division of labor.

Right?

People like Nick Land propose ideas. Like what it, well will only 20% of the world is actually productive

this is what he says so he says what if the other 80% are just ignored what if we built walled

cities of just the productive 20% and just cut off the rest.

Like we don't care about them anymore.

We don't have to worry about them.

And that's like kind of the outlook of a lot of the dark and light.

The problem is that evidently the collection of data at scale completely runs against that logic you need

for some reason we need to collect the data of the other 80% to truly um to truly know anything right anyway uh it's actually the superfluous unproductive time

people spend that gives us perspective on what is the range of human taste and sensibility.

In other words.

Okay, yeah, please send it.

Okay. please send it.

So now you can think about that in today's terms with automation and superfluous labor.

We're not going to divulge into that, although I have my own response to Mr. Land.

But think about the perspective of this from someone

who's living 3,000 years

ago in a secret order.

Who's living in a secret order where they only

communicate in a very

you know, cryptographically sealed way, which is not meant to be intercepted by ordinary people or the state.

Think about their perspective on this. They, too, have achieved a degree of enlightenment that they would like, and they'd like to just be left alone, like John Galt, let us go and cultivate this enlightenment in peace, you know, without the rest of society.

Now, thus far in history, we've seen it's not the case.

Every elite depends upon the masses because the masses scale. The masses are the abstraction of masses. There are no special terms. The masses keep them humble because the masses don't have to define themselves via exclusion. The masses are the

masses.

There's also the part about

the division of labor, I mentioned,

but

yeah, it's mainly that.

If you have a secret order,

you have a secret brotherhood

that's defining itself

in an exclusionary way or whatever,

like...

Um, you don't you you necessarily also depend upon the opposite right

but then I keep thinking about something that bothers me and it's related to

Marxism.

For example,

the time travel

that Marxists engage in

bothers me.

When it comes to UFOs.

Because China was for all and intents and purposes,

centuries behind the modern West.

But Marxism allowed them to skip a bunch of different stages of historical development that

actually now leads China to be more advanced.

The same was true for the Soviet Union, for Russia.

And Marxism was the Enlightenment that allowed that leap to occur.

So what if there were other leaps in history that we just don't know about?

What if there were enlightened forerunners to the Marxist outlook

or something like that we don't know

about that they cultivated these

secret societies

you know and they only

communicated cryptographically

nobody was able to intercept it and they

became very refined and advanced in doing that.

How would they acquire independence from the rest of society?

How would they acquire autarchy?

Well, what if, at some point in history they achieved true

autarchy and

declared independence from the entire

division of labor of society

what if they discovered a much more

efficient source of energy

what if they discovered their own way to grow their own food and build things?

And it was just a million times more efficient, and they just didn't share it with the rest of society

and it allowed them to insulate themselves from the world and kind of explore this runaway takeoff

process you know of technological acceleration and discovery.

So these, let's call them islands of acceleration, technological acceleration, just vastly out out

pacing the rest of world history

in these secret enclaves

which managed to just become fully self-sustaining

from the rest of society

yeah a breakaway civilization secret organization fully self-sustaining from the rest of society.

Yeah, breakaway civilization.

Secret orders turning into breakaway civilizations, right?

That's what I'm talking about.

Okay.

But the civilizations, like, really small. They're not interested in growing their population a ton

because they don't need to because through technology

they don't need the scale of thousands or millions of people

now think about how scary that would be they don't even need the scale so they

they don't even concern themselves so much with uh with that.

They're managed to extend their lifespans and all sorts of things.

You wouldn't even be able to wrap your head around.

They're keeping all this secret from society.

Would we be able to know?

Would there be any way to know? I mean, would there be any way to know?

Like, there wouldn't.

Like, if what I'm saying is true, there'd be no way to know.

Right?

There'd be no way to know.

Um... way to know.

But if they got so advanced, at a certain point, they would probably be interested in controlling the rest of human society.

And if they could just seduce leaders or somehow tempt leaders with better technology or better wealth and whatever access to this shit, you'd probably have a situation where you have this pyramid of elites within most human civilizations who are bribed off by these breakaway civilizations

and kept tightly controlled

and and you know what if somebody leaks it to the public

well they'd be declared crazy or they they'd be killed, or who knows, right?

But you'd have this pyramid of people who are tied to these shadow, breakaway secret order,

breakaway civilizations. the goal for the rest of humanity what would these

breakway civilizations still need even if it was just one what would they need why would they need?

Why would they need humanity to continue to exist?

For the same reason, Palantir needs us to continue to exist.

They need the data.

Because they have created their own breakaway civilization but organic humanity in its natural

state

they need to preserve that

because if

that goes extinct

they don't have a

subject to experiment on anymore they don't have a subject to experiment on anymore.

They don't, they have less knowledge, continuous knowledge, at least, of the full range of human ability and so on and so on, right?

So the way it would be structured is that most human societies would be farms they would

just be designed to keep people complacent and in place and ordered and just enough to just kind of exist physically,

um,

to be experimented on.

And maybe that's where the UFOs are coming from

ancient Marxists

and uh

but actually i don't believe any of this i'm not even kidding like i have guess guess why none of this

is true You said you sent me a friend request.

Can you tell me what your name is on Discord? You know, Uh, which one is it?

Maybe you can send me a kick message.

No, there's no messages on kick.

I don't know.

Oh yeah, yeah, I get get it i get it uh i'll just accept a bunch of friend requests

i wish they oh wait hold, wait, hold on.

Did you just send it to me now?

If you...

Yeah, just send it to me right now.

Like, just like right now.

Well, I think this is you.

Maybe this is you.

Okay. I'll read this.

I'll read it.

All right.

So,

let me continue.

So, guys, I don't, you know, guess, guess the reason I don't believe any of this is very simple.

For all, there's a multitude of reasons, but the simplest one I could think of, that's very simple right sexuality in order for what I'm saying to be true these secret societies would have to be completely

asexual beings with no desires with no whatever whatever. And that's impossible.

It's like, uh,

definitionally impossible, right, for a human being. Nope, desire cannot be overcome.

That's my theory.

But, you know, but it deserves more thought, you know,

the whole thing about, breakaway civilizations.

It's okay. It deserves to be kind of entertained. Like, what if? You know, we wouldn't know.

Wouldn't know. But if there are UFOs, if there is any, like, unexplainable advanced technology on Earth,

I believe it's from breakaway civilizations.

I don't think it's aliens from outer space.

Could they not castrate themselves?

You know, that would not eliminate the, in the, you know, in the psychoanalytic sense of sexuality and desire that, it's not, you're thinking about it too directly it's much more of a

problematic of the architecture of subjectivity which makes it impossible for it to be fulfilled

or satisfied in anything permanently, right?

So we're talking about something

in the nature of subject,

not necessarily about

the direct acts of whatever.

I mean, that's probably related for sure, but, yeah.

So, yeah.

I don't know.

You guys didn't like my story, but it's something I watched the documentary, the age of disclosure.

I watched it.

I watched it on on amazon and i asked logo i was like

what's what is this about because i don't believe any of it and he goes he said the reason is

just so people think the the government like all powerful, which makes sense to me a lot.

Like that's the SIOP.

The SIOP is this idea.

The government is all.

There's a whole lot of reasons actually for the UFO SIOP.

Part of it is also

to trivialize and relativize

the antagonisms

of society. It's exactly what Reagan

said. Reagan is the one who spelled it out.

If we had some alien threat,

we would suddenly not even be thinking

about the conflicts among human beings so much, right?

That's like the common sense reason for the UFO sci-up.

It's like if we start, you know, hallucinating there's aliens, suddenly the problems among society and politics

and don't fucking mean anything. I mean, Marco Rubio was in that documentary, you know?

Oh, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, in the face of...

I'm siding with the aliens, motherfucker.

Hey, if there's actually fucking aliens, let me tell you the first thing I want...

I'm not inherently siding with humanity.

No, I'm fucking not.

If those aliens have a much more advanced comprehension of dialectics and they are communists,

we should like, we should accept their mentorship we should humble ourselves and accept their patronage

or two to what is it called we should become their vassals vassal states or whatever

whatever they're asking

I'm I would

much rather listen to an alien than

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio is a fucking retard

if there's actually aliens here If there's actually aliens here,

I'm siding

with them. Why the

fuck would I side with this fat

retard? Marco Rubio doesn't know fucking anything

about anything. If there's

actually aliens

here,

I'm on their side.

I saw this stupid document.

What if they're a threat to our now?

Fuck our national security, motherfucker.

If there's aliens here,

America is nothing. It's dead. There's no nations. There's nothing.

We are now at a cosmic scale of significance. And we need to fucking learn from these. We need to humble ourselves and learn from them. That's what we need to fucking learn from these we need to humble ourselves and learn from them that's what we need to do

I want to know

what they're all about

I mean you came here

from across the stars

apparently

you know more

well who the fuck am I?

I want these people to teach us.

Oh, is solving world?

No, not even to solve our problems.

I want knowledge of cosmic truth.

I want the true

questions

of universal existence

and 100,000

percent. You know what aliens would tell

Westerners? Reed

Hegel, that was the smartest guy

you ever had. That's literally what the aliens would say they'd say marks yes but especially hagel hagel got the closest you know what fucking scared me one time i saw a reddit post i know it's red Reddit and it was like apparently some like, uh, military guy, like disclosing secrets about aliens and their intentions. I shit you not though. It sounded so Higelian. They were like, yeah, what the aliens think is that there's this dimension

it's literally a physical dimension it's called the soul field this is a negentropic field and

the universe there's a soul field in the universe, and cultivating it is actually what create, like, that's the development of consciousness and civilization.

And you can develop that enough to become just more advanced.

And it's like literally like... can develop that enough to become just more advanced.

And it's like literally like Hagle's spirit, but like turned,

turned into physics. And I was like, bro, that's like so Higelian.

It might be true. Um,

um,

anyway, and it might be true. Anyway,

I want, I want to, I don't,

I will side with the aliens.

It's not even because I want to fix humanity's problems.

It's because I want knowledge.

Because I am the

glub go gabgallab.

The swabble, dabble, dabble, dabble, blah, blah,

I'm full of shwibbly libbug.

If you know that fucking reference, you're crazy.

You're fucking idiot.

Anyway,

I want knowledge.

I don't want,

I don't fucking care about

anything anymore

if there's aliens here.

But wipe us all out

for all I care.

You treaded across the cosmos like it was nothing. What worth does humanity

have anymore? And even me, let's just get vaporized. Nothing matters. But if anything you're going to

offer to us, give us knowledge of truth. Give us knowledge of what is fundamental.

Tell us...

Tell us the real truth.

I want to know their religion. I want to know their religion.

I want to know their...

If they have something like that.

I want to know these things.

I don't care.

And if they're not Marxists,

I'll tell them to vaporize us

because we don't stand a fucking chance.

No, they're they, a priori, I know for a fact, they're Marxists.

You don't have, I'm not going to play these games of even entertaining stupid things. They're like idiots on the documentary.

They're like, what do we need to find a way to fight them?

Fight them?

Fight them?

What do you mean

fight them

you're gonna

you're gonna

what do you think this is a fucking movie

you're gonna just fucking

you think this is Transformers

you're gonna be Shia Leboof

you're gonna to be Shailaboof?

You're going to be some rugged person with an AR-15

in the swamp. We're resisting

the aliens. Shut the fuck up and sit

down.

How can we meaningfully talk about a conflict if aliens are here?

There's no conflict.

There's no conflict.

That's the truth. There's no conflict. That's the truth.

There's no conflict.

It's not like everything we know about war and conflict itself and social existence and being and

meaningfulness and purpose.

All of that changes if there's aliens here. All of that changes. And I'm siding with them. Immediately I'm siding with them. What if they side with Israel?

Bro, they can do anything they want it doesn't matter because what am i what are we going to do what can i say like what could i say i don't even know what I would say at that point.

I would submit to the fatality of annihilation.

I would say, you know what, aliens, just vaporize the rest of us.

This is the universe.

I don't want to be part of it.

I would make an irreducible choice to simply not be part of the cosmos.

Because clearly it's not for me. Clearly, I'm not part of the chosen people in their eyes, literally.

So what could you do? Resist aliens? How?

You can't resist.

Maybe there's maybe, okay, look, if there's a, you know what, they're going to kill me, these aliens. Because I suspect if there was aliens here, there probably is a noetic

or psychological

way to resist them. They probably

don't have full control over that

and are for some

reason intimidated by it.

And so I would go to the

I would go into the Sh would go into the Shaolin

temple and like fight them

on the astral plane then

meditating.

However you can,

of course,

if there's a way,

maybe that's the true battle,

you know?

It's all psychological. Maybe that's why they don't fuck with me maybe they're bad but they're just they can't yeah you mean you can annihilate us

physically but you they want our souls.

We're in the schizophrenic... Yeah, we are.

100% is the schizophrenic.

Yeah, it's pretty schizophrenic.

I mean, yeah, I mean, you're not wrong about that.

Have you seen a Diddy documentary?

No.

You contact King Azuli.

You know, I need to fucking put

Text to Stream donations.

Okay, I'm just reading the chat for some fucking reason.

Anyway, y'all um you put the timestamp oh boy these these are the smart right wingers

Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes

they're so like

hello Nick

how are you doing

I'm so like

you know

distinguished

okay 128 to 133 I'm so, like, you know, distinguished.

Okay, 128 to 133.

That's a lot.

Eh.

Democrats, centrist Democrats are sincerely talking about defunding Israel as well.

And maybe it's this time of Israeli expansion. And they're one way...

Okay, these guys are like such dipshits.

They sincerely think the U.S. is going to start defunding. So this is a problem

The materialist perspective.

They're going off of what's the trajectory of future U.S. Israel relations

strictly and solely based

off of what?

Off of rhetoric, off

of sentiment. They're not asking

the question, well, why is

there such a close, quote-unquote, relationship

between Israel and the U.S.?

Lady Midwesternstein?

They're not deigning to ask the question of what is actually materially the source of the connection.

What's the money trail?

How is Israel embedded in the Anglo-Atlantic global empire? Why is it necessary? What factions of the ruling class does it represent? What geopolitical systems, you know global economic system how does it factor in that you know

they don't give a fuck about any of that they're just well democrats are kind of saying me just

shut up dude us is not going to cut ties with Israel anytime soon.

That it can be justified to the right

is going to be the Matt Walsh

type of like, well, I don't

care what they do.

Actually, I do care.

So, like, Richard Spencer

is, he like, I don't know what's, Richard Spencer is, he, like,

I don't know what's,

he,

he,

he overthinks things to such an extent,

that he arrives at these conclusions that are just meant to

distinguish himself from,

you know, it's, yeah, I mean, he's kind of like just a contrarian, but in a really

pretentious pseudo-intellectual way. Like, he will, he's effectively saying, he's imagining

this scenario where like

somehow it's going to become the consensus of the U.S.

hegemony to disalign with Israel

and then Matt Walsh is going to justify it

on the basis of America First rhetoric

and that this is actually going to play into the hands of Israel.

So Richard Spencer, being the true anti-Zionist, is arriving at the conclusion that, no, no, no, actually, I don't want to sever that relationship.

I want there to continue to be, you know, this Zionist control of U.S. foreign policy.

So in this way, he's twisted himself into a prentzel of just being a Zionist.

And this is not surprising because it is consistent with how he has arrived at literally every

other position he fucking has, including the support for NATO and Ukrainian Ukraine.

But why does that make him, I guess, more intelligent than the rest of the right?

Because he's discovered what the rest of the right wing is too stupid to wake up to.

The real content of the alt-right and of right-wing consciousness

is just supporting the existing status quo.

Wow!

You're telling me the right-wing is not revolutionary? You're telling me the right wing is not revolutionary.

You're telling me the right wing, it just exists to run water from whatever so happens to be.

Wow!

Apparently only Richard Spencer was smart enough to discover that.

Other right-wingers have this kind of half-baked revolutionary consciousness,

but they're so stupid. They're trying to articulate it

in right wing terms

and obviously

that you know

that that

that makes for an extremely obscure

and inconsistent

and illogical product right

but

he thinks he's a genius, though, by twisting him.

It's like he's in a genius way.

He's just coming full circle between, uh, in order to be truly edgy,

you actually just have to defend the status quo.

And what better proof of dialectics is there than that?

Save us all these crazy alt-right people,

and save us all the edginess,

save us all the pretentiousness, just put the

fucking fries in the bag and admit you're a shill for the status quo. It would make everything

so much easier. I'm not an isolationist. I do care what Israel is doing. I have an opinion on it.

And that's not just because my tax dollars go there, you know, whatever.

And it's not just because they might...

Oh, this is not where they talk about Jackson.

Okay, thank you.

55, 56.

Jesus Christ,

I went for five minutes,

which is a lot in this kind of interview.

55...

I was hoping it'd be a quick soundbite.

I don't want to fucking watch this so much.

...is using me as a tool

for some little tactical agenda. I mean, look, Putin, he went to Dresden,

and after the end of the Cold War, he was involved, and before the end of the Cold War,

he was involved with the remnant of the Red Army faction, which was an extreme.

Yeah!

He had deal with-

So it was Putin.

I didn't know that.

No fucking, I think I heard this before.

I think I heard this before.

I don't know how I forgot about it.

Putin!

I didn't know

he was, bro, bro, Putin.

Putin's

people, it's got these stupid Western leftists

who attack Putin.

When Richard Spencer's telling you, Putin's a bad guy, maybe you should think about who the real fascist is, right?

Billings with neo-Nazis in East Germany and then in...

Wait, so Putin was involved...

Wait, wait, wait, what did he say?

Killing neo-Nazis or did I think they're...

Group. He had dealings with neo-Nazis.

Oh, he had... Oh, okay. Nevermind.

He had dealings with neo-Nazis.

I thought he said he had, you know, in killings with neo-Nazis I thought he said

he had

you know

and killings

of neo-Nazis

my bad

whoopsie

okay

well that was

okay

come on Putin

what's going on

Germany

and then

in the unified

Germany they don't care Putin Germany and then in the unified Germany.

They don't care.

Putin is always just going to be half-based,

which is a lot

saying something because most people are

0%. But

yeah.

About us.

They, if they, if they find any use

for us it's so that we can

fuck things up

and

what

what even is this

obviously you know what that's? It's not even true.

I mean, it would seem like a truism.

Oh, yeah, Russians don't care about the West beyond securing their own interests,

as in securing their interests from Western aggression,

which would be entirely rational and makes sense.

But I actually think that is more true for China than it is for Russia.

I think Russians actually do have a universal outlook where they see this as a world of good versus evil.

And they, it's not, it's not all cynical. The Russian mentality is very much rooted in a

universalistic, they're a Christian country. They have a universalistic

view of humanity and good and bad, and they do have morals, and they do have a sense of,

well, I mean, even in the kind of global framework in which they envision, if there's operations to destabilize Western countries, they still have a notion that, well, they're not destabilizing the countries.

They're destabilizing evil governments and and elites that came from the soviet era you know but they they they it's not complete cynicism i would say that's wrong so i i i don't know you don't even have to like go to Russia to know that by the way.

You just have to know how, you know, Russian people think and what the Russian outlook is.

It's very clear if you have any familiarity with that.

You can really, I think it's worrisome to get too close and buddy-buddy with Russia.

It's cringe. It's embarrassing. But I think you can be used in a way that's very destructive.

And the other thing that I have felt is someone like Alexander Dugan

he can talk about, you know, like, oh, the real Europe will rise up

or whatever. They hate us.

You know, my...

Europe? Oh, he means, oh, he is Europe, right? I forgot. Richard Spitz you know my euro

oh he means

oh he is Europe right

I forgot

Richard Spencer is the representative of

Europe

Michael McFall

because he's white

a person I usually

don't really like that much

he went to

Russian he spoke with Putin and Putin scratched. He wrote about this in an

op-ed in Washington Post. He scratched his hand and he said,

you think we're white. We're not white.

Based. I love that. Putin is so friendly with African leaders and he's so mean to the European ones.

And you know what? It's quite based.

This isn't a... Dugan is giving you a chance to Sapiens, by the... When he says the real

Europe, yeah, that's a chance at Sapiens. You should take it. Humble yourself, all right?

It's not hatred

I don't

I don't think we can

really underestimate

the animosity

of Russia and these actors

I don't think they want

a happy go lucky

multipolar world or they want that only to the extent that America turns in on itself in chaos. So anyway, I'm preaching and not asking questions, but you can, you know, they just realistically understand there's a U.S. ruling class,

which is not going to go down without a fucking fight, which is a fact.

Like, it's just common sense. Oh, yeah. Yeah, the U.S. is just going to become a peaceful partner

in a multipolar world

without, you know,

wanting to maintain

the Anglo-Atlantic

global financial system

that enslaves and dominates

the world by force.

Shut the...

This guy's literally retarded i'm sorry oh they did they

they don't just want a peaceful multipolar world uh they they have to they anticipate some

radical changes would have to happen in america of course radical changes would have to

fucking happen because all the material incentives of the U.S. ruling class are against multipolarity and in favor of maintaining unipolar hegemony.

I mean, are you kidding? You get rid of that unipolar hegemony every member of the

Wall Street ruling class loses everything

you think they're going to be

okay with that basic class

analysis saves you from

stupidity you know this is why

I say you need Marxism for sapiens

you're not a Marxist.

You're literally not even like a human being

if you're speaking as an intellectual.

Quote, respond,

if you'd like. I totally agree.

I agree with all that. And I think you're right.

We can't underestimate their animosity

because they're very clear in their rhetoric

about what they think about us.

And it's interesting how

when the right wing treats Russia,

they're always falling for this Russian

propaganda where Russia says

the Satanic West.

The West is Satanic.

The West is evil

because the West is transgendered

and the West is, you know, whatever.

But they always leave on the cutting room floor that they're also always attacking colonialism. And they're saying that the European Union are Nazis.

NATO is the new Nazis.

And when you think about the past 200 years, you sort of get it because of Napoleon, because

of Hitler, because of the Kaiser.

And so they actually do legitimately see NATO as this German army marching eastward on Russia.

And they hate it.

And they hate that we're liberal.

They hate that we have political liberty.

They hate that we're liberal. They hate that we have political liberty. They hate that we are, you know, that we are that civilization.

So I totally agree with you.

And that doesn't make me like, obviously the war with Ukraine.

I'm not pro-Ukrainian, but I am pro-European.

And I especially hate it when you get these like Matt Walsh-ty or whoever that say,

pro-French.

They hate the Europeans.

They're a bunch of like... Especially France.

Especially France.

See, whatever.

It's like, no, they're actually our closest allies.

They're the motherland.

They have a rich, prosperous economy.

Even to the extent that they're liberal and secular, I think it is motivated by something good.

It's motivated by this kind of compassion for the...

It is motivated.

Even to the extent that they're liberal and rich, it's like, no, they're actually Europeans.

You get these like Matt Walsh types or whoever that say, I hate the Europeans.

They're a bunch of like socialists, just to see, whatever.

It's like, no, they're actually our closest allies.

They're the motherland.

They have a rich, prosperous economy,

even to the extent that they're liberal.

You know why we're going to lap these people?

Which is crazy to say now.

I mean, look, there's only 300 people here.

So I get that.

But we're going to lap them

because these people are not America first.

They're a remnant of the

European Colonial Project.

And America was founded

upon repudiating that and building something entirely new here.

Now, was America still, you know, were the birth pangs of Europe still defining America for its beginning history?

And yeah, but we could see the arrow of time here.

America, as time went on, has gradually distinguished itself from Europe.

And you know what?

Even Europeans observe this. They say they're you are mara mutts because everyone's just mixed

no longer can even racially be classified uniformly right you had the civil rights movement

you had all these things that just kind of made us unique

and a completely new...

And that's what the...

That's the founding principle of it. What about all

the stuff about free white people? Yeah,

that was the beginning, okay?

But the founding spark and founding principle of the country absolutely tended toward a direction

and envisioned a future of just an american republic distinct from europe taking its leave from

europe right and these people can't let go of these old paradigms, these old world paradigms, of what kind of civilization and country we are or will be.

Now, this isn't about white people racially at all because even white Americans here are very

distinct, very distinct, civilizationally from Europe. So it's not about race, but for them, it's like they still just like the ds a they believe in importing

one for one european paradigms you know the dsa believes in importing european socialism these

guys believe in importing europe you know notions of nations and nation states

well if we're going to be importing anything from the old world let's make it a little more

comprehensive let's import all of Eurasia not just Europe let's import what all of Eurasia, not just Europe. Let's import what all of Eurasia has to offer in

terms of thousands of years of civilizational wisdom. And you know what? You know who agreed

with me the fucking founding fathers, who were all obsessed with fucking pyramids and Babylon and shit.

So yeah, you know what?

This erophilia

is just complete. You're just

announcing that you don't have what it takes.

Because when shit pops off in this country,

yeah, there's going to be European intervention.

And there's going to be independent domestic actors who are free from all foreigners, right?

And who do you think is going to have more legitimacy when it comes to leading the nation?

Foreign powers or something

homegrown? Oh, and secular.

I think it is motivated by something good.

It's motivated by this kind of compassion for the world or

care for humanity in and of itself or for the planet

or the environment. I think those are good things. That's part of what makes us us.

And so I like the idea of the European Union

as a distinct power in its own right,

standing alongside the United States.

And I would even prefer to fortify that

over aligning with Russia,

rebuild Europe's army and let that be the ally

rather than relying on Russia,

which you're right.

I think they're not us.

You know, they be another way to say that. And I regard them very similar to China. It's just like one of these Asian empires and it has little to do with Europe, at least at this point in history.

Yeah, but you know, but America will never be what it was meant to until it joins Eurasia, until it joins the Asian empires.

We will only, we're either going to be an

Asian empire ourselves or

nothing. Because the age of America

as a colony of Europe

has to come

to an end, or else there's not going to

the entire legacy of 1776 will be erased from history as a complete impossibility

and i'm not willing to completely repudiate that founding dream of this country i believe we have what it takes to join Asia.

We are not a European country.

And we have no business being a European country.

And we're not.

Now, whatever, we can be influenced by Europe, just like Russia's influenced by Europe.

It doesn't mean we're a European country.

We should have more in common with Mexico

and Mexico is an Asian

quote unquote empire right the Aztecs

the Mayans and then even more south

South America you Peru you get the Inkins

yeah these are empires that are

indistinguishable from Asian

collectivistic empires, right?

So we're not in Asia

geographically, but Asian empire

is the way out of this mess we

call European modernity.

And, you know,

even Napoleon wanted to escape

the mess of European modernity. Napoleon admired Asia

and China and Egypt and shit.

He's trying to

create a giant continental

power.

That's what

people don't understand. For Europe to

itself become a power

contradicts

Europe. Europe.

Europe is distinguished from the world through the balconizing tendency.

Powers, you know, I think you're going to get some of that no matter what.

Great powers are just by nature Asiatic.

This is what these fucking idiots don't understand.

You can pick your poison.

Either have a small, shitty country like Belgium, or have a large empire.

You have a large empire.

Then you're joining Eurasia.

You're joining Asia.

Ken Treesey, what's up with the five?

Like, Trump raises the flag, and I'm sure there was backing for that. And then Biden came in,

and there was backing for that. And so I think there's some, there's like a low background kind of noise with that across the board when you get to a certain level. But I just try to avoid these

displays like Tucker Carlson has put on where he's sniffing the bread

and glazing the shopping carts and he's in Qatar saying

I'm an American. Of course I could buy a house in Doha. It's like, what? Do you even

hear yourself anymore? So I just try to avoid that. And the kind of third

world is Jackson Hinkle, you know, desucking where he goes to, like, Niger, and he's hanging out with them. Yeah, I'm glad you do that.

You're not avoiding anything, Nick.

You're just not fucking invited.

You're just not fucking invited, you know?

And that's really what this comes down to.

You're just not invited. Nobody fucking wants you.

To meet with that. I mean mean if you were truly the representative

of America then people would be

inviting you to these countries

you know

the selective language

is so great

he's claiming Jackson is uh is is taste. The selective language is so great.

He's claiming Jackson is glazing

neager. Isn't that what you're

fucking doing to Europe?

Oh yeah, well, I'm European.

Shut the fuck up and go live in Europe.

Like, what's the difference?

I mean, America was founded on the basis of war with Europe.

Not war with Niger, not war with Burkina Fossil.

War with Europe is the foundation of this country. Even the civil war was, okay? All the powers of Europe

supported the Confederacy. You know who supported the Union? Russia did. The Ottoman Empire did.

Did you know the Ottoman Empire supported the Union? They did.

Okay.

I think even China supported

the Qing Dynasty

I think, I think, correct me

if I'm wrong on that.

What is

going on with the Qatari thing?

I tried to even look into it, and it just strikes me...

So that's the end of the...

Oh, wait, there's two more minutes. Jesus Christ.

Labyrinthine. Like, I don't understand.

It's like Qatar is sort of pro-Israel, but they weren't officially members of the Abraham Accords. They had a military base, but they also support Hamas. They like Tucker Carl. I mean, Tucker, look, it's one thing to be accused of being a Qatari agent. It's another thing to go and like wine and dine with the Qataris. It's like, what are you doing there? What are you possibly doing there outside of working

for them? You know, I mean, it's, I, but do you have any idea what they're after?

I don't know. And there's something real there, though.

Yeah, it is.

You know, when people say Tucker Cotarlson, a lot of people dismiss that, but that's

100% real.

And, you know, look at Omid Malik, who is the financier behind this 1789 capital that gave the money for the Tucker Carlson network.

And you look at Omid Malik, he's got another company where it's either the name or the logo is one of the Persian royalist symbols.

And so what you have in Qatar is, I guess, a lot of the oligarchs in Qatar are exiles from Iran after the revolution.

So there are a lot of people there.

Yeah, they're not necessarily Zionists, but they are kind of like sympathetic to the

royalists. And the other thing is, people point out the British... By the way, this guy is just

waffling. Qatar is ruled by the Iranian monarchist diaspora. I've never heard this before

this is what are you talking about

maybe he's right I don't know I've never heard that

before that's the first time I've ever heard and as somebody who's pretty familiar with the region I've never heard that before. That's the first time I've ever heard.

And as somebody who's pretty familiar with the region,

I've never heard anything like that.

Qatar,

no, Qatar is the sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood along with Turkey. That's whatever. There's a Turkey-Katar axis. That's the thing about Qatar is it's Turkey. It's, it's, uh, the, you know, the neo-Ottoman vision.

Because the Gulf states used to support, you know, that some kind of variation of Sunni Islamism ubiquitously.

And Saudi Arabia and the UAE decided to stop doing that and have their own internal purge and then Qatar continued doing it and that's just what makes Qatar different I guess Qatar does have a politically political vision of Islam that is combined with some kind of liberalism.

It's very strange and bizarre.

It'd be hard to explain it actually.

Anyway,

let's continue.

Because Qatar and Bahrain and the Emirates were the crucial states.

They were British colonies, and they were largely doing the pearl trade.

And when they gained their independence,

some of them became the Emirates, the UAE, and Qatar and Bahrain got independence.

And she kind of have to look at them as maybe there's like a British angle there.

I don't know exactly.

It's like you said, it's sort of labyrinthine.

You've got some choice

Iranians there. They've got this British heritage. And the other thing is, a lot of people

forget, there was a huge shakeup. I'll be honest. I don't actually know anything about the British

angle there.

In terms of European powers, Qatar is aligned

with.

I could not tell you.

I've heard a lot

of things about Erdogan

and the Muslim Brotherhood being a British project.

Couldn't tell you. I've just heard too many conflicting things.

Around 2020, like from roughly 2017 to 2020, there was a huge shakeup in the Gulf.

And there's a lot of weird stuff that goes hand in glove with Trump, like the Vegas shooting, for example.

You have the death of King Abdullah the second of Saudi Arabia.

He's replaced by King Salman.

There's a power grab by Mohammed bin Salman in 17, where he puts everybody in house arrest and he kidnapped the president of Lebanon.

And then he becomes-

My assumption is that Qatar represents the old

old monarchic you know

powers

old dynasties old roy royalties, and, you know, there was a, yeah, there was a shakeup in Saudi Arabia.

It became more of a nation state. They cultivated more of a nationalism, modern state.

You know, there's that famous photo of bin Salman with

Macron and that next to the painting of the liberty leading the people, right?

So like Macron was insinuating that what bin salman was doing was he's like modernizing

saudi arabia in the in this you know technical sense of the word like creating a modern

universalistic state like universalistic in the relative to feudalism sense

um's basically the leader of Saudi Arabia at a very young age.

Then in 2020, there's this, I don't know if you remember, but all the Gulf

country is sanctioned Qatar because of its ties with Iran.

And Trump weighed in and basically resolved that.

And then you have the Abraham

Accords. There's no more talk about

Jackson here. All right.

Kurt Kushner used his connections

in all those countries to broker the deal

and it has all the sovereign wealth money moving from the Gulf into Israel.

And so I don't know what to make of that.

That's sort of what I know about it.

And it would seem to me like, and I think I heard you say this, maybe there's an angle where

they're laundering money.

Maybe the money is coming through, Qatar, into Israel, coming through Kotter.

I suggested Russia because the Russian thing with Tucker is kind of easy.

Like he's just promoting Russia.

But I don't understand how he's helping

Qatari interest. And so I'm like,

maybe it's just a... These guys are so lost.

It's fucking crazy. Like, these guys are just so lost.

It's quite sad.

Russia and Qatar are not aligned.

I would say Russia, historically, that period of the shakeup, they're calling it in 2017, 2020, Russia welcomed that on the side of the UAE and Saudi Arabia versus Qatar. Why? Because in Syria, it was seen as a repudiation of the Syrian project by Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

They're not going to be interested in exporting Arab Spring-style revolutions anymore.

And, you know, the whole thing about trying to influence foreign influence.

Russia welcomed that.

Qatar, on the other hand,

remained a kind of moralistic,

you know, more universalistic power aligned with Obama

and the old style liberal foreign interventionism.

Yeah, so Russia, I think, has more ties to the UAE than to Qatar.

Unfortunately, I mean, it's not a good thing, but it's just true.

Maybe that's changed significantly now, but in the recent past, that was the case.

Now, what's the angle?

What these people are ignoring is that Israel is here through Lakud.

Lakud and Netanyahu are a different faction.

They are a specific faction within Israel that is aligned with some kind of post-liberal vision of the new world order, right?

And absolutely is related to Silicon Valley. It ties the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Silicon Valley.

To some extent, a lot of the people around the Trump phenomena and Lakoud all represent a specifically

Western post-liberal

um

order. What I would say is fascist, you know,

I would call it fascist.

But one that

does contradict

um

the remnants of

you know,

there's these different, not necessarily distinct and opposed sections of the ruling class, but maybe you could call it generations of the ruling capitalist class.

Some of these, like George Soros, are particularly committed to the preservation of an older

era of, you know, U.S. global democracy or whatever right and others like let's remember a lot of this

new money that represents the class that you know know, is buzzing around here.

The Russian oligarchical class is one of them, by the way.

And Putin and the development of Russian geopolitics has come at the expense of them.

But in any case, there was a whole generation of new money that emerges in the post-war

period of U.S. history that was bypassing central government U.S. regulations through the city of London.

And this is where neoliberalism comes from.

This is where Reaganomics comes from.

Basically, the New Deal was overthrown

by this new class.

New class. We're not really talking class, new class.

We're not really talking about a new class.

We're talking about a new generation

of the ruling class, right?

But some of these gatekeeping old guards

had a specific vision

of basically nothing. here's my radical thesis my radical thesis

is that it's not a conflict within the old ruling class it's the same ruling class

george soros is just as much of an oligarch

as

the late Sheldon Aedelson

or whatever, right?

Same, it's the same.

But George Soros had a specific ideology

that ideology

one for one

was just a reflection

of an outmoded era

of U.S. history. So just like in feudal and late capital, early modernity, early capitalism, it was actually oftentimes that the bourgeoisie inherited feudal ideology, right? Even though their class position structurally contradicted it. So you have something similar. A new class emerges in the post-war period

and so far the representatives

of this class

have not been

fully

representing the interests of that

class

at least and not because they're representing other

class's interests, but because they're carrying a lot of baggage from the past.

Post-war liberal democratic ideology that came from the New Deal actually, you know.

And it's like Obama's the culmination of that in a lot of ways.

And it doesn't mean Obama represents the legacy of the New Deal.

It just means ideologically so.

When you think about this as a war between different ideologies rather than conflicting material interests, it makes a lot more sense because materially, not much has changed since Obama, not

materially, rhetorically, yes, ideologically, yes, culturally, yes, materially, not really.

And the Democrats, when you think about it, did not really, they're not putting up much of a resistance to these changes.

They are doing so rhetorically.

There are institutional gatekeepers who are resisting these changes like any, but they're being shaken up quite easily.

It's not rising to the status of an intensity that you would expect so you have to think about it in these terms um i'd say that the changes i've talked about this with Kyle before actually

changes not that you know that I'm not saying this because there's a special significance to

Kyle's knowledge on this but it's like I literally have spoken with him about it. I haven't spoken

with anyone else really about this.

Is that the, there seems to be a way in which the ruling class is purging its own

structural gatekeepers.

And these gatekeepers are becoming

declassed.

But it's not actually a conflict

within the ruling class itself, if that makes sense.

Anyway, guys,

yeah, we're're gonna wrap up

the stream this is i i i it's gone on this long

i don't even know you know

truth be told

but um

guys remember i'm wide as hell

like people don't know how wide

wide as hell bro

wide I said wide not white

even though I'm pretty pale right now

anyway y'all

hope you like the stream

bye bye

see you guys

Tuesday

Bye bye bye