The Debate You've All Been Waiting For [POGAN DESTROYED!]

2022-03-19
so pogan let me ask you a question
guys this is on let me let me guys this
is what happens when i don't yell
this is what happens when i don't yell
over these fucking soy boy pieces of
shit cucks is that they constantly
fucking uh gesture around and they do
this fucking bullshit which you deemed
as an essential component of my analogy
which was the key word sympathetic
proved itself to be entirely inessential
you would fail the lsat you'd never be
allowed in law school you are genuinely
a almost naturally stupid person get the
shit out of your fucking ears and stop
wasting our time you dumb fucking pig
so let's begin yeah go for it
you are wrong
about the details surrounding russia's
invasion of ukraine okay and
what about well actually you made a
video saying that i lied uh about the
situation what did i lie about uh the
representation of ukraine as
staunchly neo-nazi sympathetic and
somehow beholden to like ultra-ukrainian
nationalism in the way that you were
describing in addition to forwarding the
idea that um there's some reason de
facto to believe that ukraine is in
possession of bio-weapons facilities
merely based on the statements made by
russian scientists beautiful so there's
it's actually two-pronged so the first
prong
refers to the
over-representation of neo-nazis in the
ukrainian government and in the
ukrainian state as well as the
overwhelming prevalence of ukrainian
ultranationalism in defining the state
of ukraine right
and the second thing is about the as
victoria newland call them research
facilities within ukraine
so can i ask real quick can i ask a
clarifying question sure um when you
when you say
like ukraine is neo-nazi blah blah blah
blah
um i take it you're referring to
something further than azov
um yes what's your take on
and you don't like this is we'll get
into the meat and potatoes here as you
like to say in a second what's your take
on things like uh wagner group and
russian government neo-nazis wagner
group
is not tied to the russian government in
any official capacity it's not given any
official sanction whatsoever wait that's
i well of course i agree but the point
is that it's not tied to the government
officially right because it provides
plausible deniability for wagner group
operations on the behalf of the kremlin
all right do you have any evidence of
these operations being on behalf of the
kremlin depend well let's cl do you when
you say on behalf do you mean the
operations are conducted in tandem with
russian military forces to achieve
russian strategic objectives i'm asking
you for evidence that the russian
government is ordering the wagner group
to do things to fulfill its own aims
seems like that would be conducive to
i'm sorry consistent with plausible
deniability oh so you have no proof
well i mean you don't have any proof
about the neo-nazis wagner is a private
military company what is azov
uh it's a member it's a component of the
ukrainian national guard right
and
and your claim is that because azov is a
component it's not just because of azov
well i i grasp that right but i'm saying
like you're so let me just be come on
let me just just chill out man
the relevance of pointing out that azov
is a component of the ukrainian national
guard presumably
right correct me if i'm wrong here is to
point out that because it's
uh directly reporting to the ukrainian
government at least in some capacity
that's reason to make what conclusion
that ukraine's government is neo-nazi
sympathetic overall
that they're at least tolerant of
neo-nazis
that's the minimal conclusion if we
discount the host of other facts
such as the fact that the azov battalion
is extremely over represented when it
comes to the military operations that
are undergone in eastern ukraine when it
comes to the fact that ukrainian
officials claim that azov was the quote
the best of ukraine's fighters
uh when you take into account finally
the fact that the azov battalion is not
even the only ultranationalist neo-nazi
battalion within ukraine you also have
the adar battalion you have a picture of
the ukrainian armed forces that
overwhelmingly shows um neo-nazi
sympathetic elements being extremely
over-represented
right okay so do you further believe
that that's reason to invade the country
of ukraine uh that is not well you just
shifted the goalposts we're talking
about whether neo-nazis have
overwhelming over-representation in the
ukrainian state how did i shift the goal
posts without making a claim because the
question of the the question of the
justification for russia's invasion
would have to
lead to more prongs
right i just i just asked two questions
the first was do you think what like
what's the relevance of azov with
respect to their ukrainian government
now with question one question two was
what do you think
uh is the relevance of that in terms of
justifying russian military operations
there's an overall context that needs to
be clarified before we can uh
explore that question and just give me
let me open like a notepad document here
in one second
just to just to clarify um would you be
willing to state like right now for my
benefit you believe the russian invasion
is justified correct yes but okay cool
um and a component of that justification
is their objective to denotify the
country is that right yes
okay
um and you think as of in addition to
some other things you'll mention i'm
sure in a second
is a reason to think that
the
i i doubt you would say like the
majority of the ukrainian population is
nazi sympathetic right
no
okay cool so it's just the government
then
uh i would call it the deep state what
does that mean so there's two levels of
every modern government in the world
except with actually a few exceptions uh
china and russia actually being among
them
where you have the official state with
like its official parties in parliament
representation and then you have like
the military and the intelligence
operatives and oligarchs and also thug
militias that are receiving orders from
these elements basically like people who
pull the strings in a non-official
capacity okay
so you so you generally think
denotification is one of a set of
reasons that another country can invade
another country
yeah um no not in a vacuum not as some
kind of abstract precept are you knowing
a cumulative case denotification is part
of the wider context of the geographic
and historical realities of ukraine and
russia but it's just the government i
thought because you remember when i said
is the population generally nazi
sympathetic you weren't you said you
weren't willing to make what's the
relevance of the population not being
overwhelmingly nazi sympathetic the fact
that a whole fucking ton of them are
getting killed right now by russian
military forces how many exactly i'm
sure it's in the thousands you want an
exact number you're not like actually
civilians
are you doubting civilians have died i
don't know i'm not hold on i'm not
denying there's been um collateral
damage right so what does the number
matter
the number matters the number matters
because
the number matters because
if russia is waging like a systematic
effort to target civilians and engage in
a genocide or something like that then
yes your argument would be no no i
didn't explain they were genociding
ukrainians i made the claim that if it's
the case that you think at least one
component of the justification for the
invasion is denotification
right
then you'd have to further say something
like well that's going to either alone
or as part of a cumulative case justify
the civilian casualties inflicted as a
consequence of this invasion right i
don't know the exact number i'm pretty
sure it's in the thousands if you
fucking really want it i'll find it
although those are going to be western
sources though you'll probably just i
don't scream about it so it is your
point is not relevant you the ukrainian
neo-nazi population does not have to be
neo-nazi sympathetic in order for
collateral damage of civilians well i
don't even accept that the government is
neo-nazi sympathetic but the point i'm
making is if the objective is to
denouncify ukraine
part of that objective means
demilitarizing ukraine uh and defeating
the azov battalion in the in these
elements slow down slow down we're
getting ahead of ourselves now it's
demilitarizing ukraine we were talking
about denotification
well they're hand in hand because the
nazis in question are overwhelmingly
represented within the military okay
wait it is the view of the russian
government as a matter of fact that the
military is in control of ukraine and
not even the president zelinski i don't
doubt that
i don't doubt that the there are
elements of the ukrainian armed forces
that are neo-nazi right even beyond
pretty much every standing military in
the world especially western ones yeah
but ukraine has a disproportionate uh an
over-representation of neo-nazis
relative to almost any military anywhere
else in the world
are you saying that the majority of the
ukrainian military is nazi sympathetic
the majority mean conscripts
or the military establishment i'm just
trying to get cl this is the same
problem we had in dms like a year ago
right i'm trying to get clarity on what
exactly it is you're claiming and it
seems like you're very careful not to
say just exactly what you mean what i'm
hearing is this you can correct me if
i'm mistaken here right
you think
that
the ukrainian armed forces
are somehow kind of like innately or at
this point they're not so i would call
them not so fight
okay as like a co as like an institution
collectively yeah the people the upper
echelons that run that institution yes
they're not suffied is the source for
that claim primarily russian reporting
um it has to do with the
over-representation of neo-nazis in the
ukrainian armed forces military
operations that's not the question i
asked you the question i asked you i
answered your question and some no it's
not simply because of russian sources i
don't know what the source has what are
the other sources um i don't think it's
contested that 10 to 15 000
of the total of the ukrainian national
guard
are part of battalions that are
ultra-nationalist neo-nazis
but your claim is that the ukrainian
armed forces simplicator are not
sufficed yeah how many how many how many
units total are in the ukrainian armed
forces
do you know i know that there's 50 000
in the national guard so so even by
presumably the sources that you're
referring to which i'll take your word
there not just russia but at least some
of it's going to be russia right
even by that standard less than what
like let's do some quick math right
uh it's been a while since i've done
yeah but before you do the math just to
be clear
it's not relevant because i've never
claimed that the majority of consoles
are 30
roughly right 30 so let me just explain
to you basic logic the majority of
conscripts within the ukrainian armed
forces are not safe
hold on don't interrupt me the majority
of constructs
are not neo-nazis what reflects in armed
forces in its actual character has to do
with the intentions that are directed at
the level of leadership that define it
as an institution conscripts are just
ordinary people okay and even even
even no we're not getting off hold on
we're not getting off track
because it is not a neces it is not true
that there has to be a majority of
conscripts that are neo-nazis in order
for the armed forces to be claimed to be
something that's nazified i didn't say
it was dependent on the majority of the
so why are you pointing out that there
is
and this is only this is a really
waiting only because 30 is still a fuck
ton
well that's again yeah i agree but
that's assuming the sources that you
haven't provided to me are legitimate
but we'll just grant that they are
because i like to be charitable okay
according to a bbc documentary
c14 runs the ministry of defense
are you done
we'll say what you want to say
yeah so let's assume that the sources
you're using for this 30
uh ukaf claim
are legitimate um and i'd like to just
say on like one topic here instead of
jumping all over the place
you are saying that the government of
ukraine
zolensky as their president is beholden
to this military and therefore the
russian campaign of denotification
is justified now that's going to depend
on a number of things being
substantiated the first thing it's going
to depend on uh substantiation for is
that the number's that high i haven't
heard a source for that yet the second
thing it's going to depend just just
real quick the second thing it's going
to depend on is
a reason to think the government in the
way that you're describing is actually
beholden to these ultra-nationalist
elements in the ukrainian military right
which is which itself is a claim that
requires evidence
so
if you can show me both of those things
if you can show me the numbers are
accurate
um the evidence like checks out there's
no problems with methodology there's no
like very obvious like implicit bias in
the reporting and then you can also show
that there's reason to think zolensky's
administration is really just
subservient to like uh what'd you call
it the
ukrainian generals right the the highest
echelons of the military
um that'd be cool
so what exactly are you asking for
i just stated clearly what i was asking
for
there was nothing clear about what you
asked whatsoever give me something
precise you want what do you i that's
like insane to say i asked for evidence
evidence claims that you made
i just told you the first thing about
that ukrainian government is not
sufficed
or i should say that's deliberately
that's a deliberately unnuanced take
ukrainian state is nazified is that a
question you're looking for
oh
sorry i just stated the two things that
i'm looking for evidence for you want
evidence that the 30 claim holds yeah i
want evidence that the number of people
who you described as nazi sympathetic
like that's an accurate it's not the
number of nazi sympathetic people it's
number of battalions that are in their
official as organizations
are ultra nationalists and or neo-nazis
okay
yeah so do you have a source for that
one and then we'll tackle the second one
afterwards sure someone get the source
and put it in fact checking wait you
don't have the source on hand i don't
have it on hand okay
someone go ahead and put it in fact
checking put the combined battalions
which comprise ten to fifteen thousand
this uh based underscore superstructure
gentleman posted something from the gray
zone
is that the
is that the one
that you remember
i don't think it's here
okay all right all right well i mean
like
hopefully you can understand the point
that i'm making because you know i'm i
like to pride myself as a relatively
anti-nazi person and you know when this
war first happened and everybody by the
way it's being the gray zone is not
going to be relevant
uh considering the fact that you have to
question where those primary sources are
coming from it doesn't matter like yes
the gravesite has an agenda to present
primary sources in this way
but the primary source would still stand
i don't actually want you to be angry
like all i did was chuckle i didn't say
it was like bullshit or anything on its
face i just did a little laugh you know
after someone go ahead and post not
everything's like the end of the world
you know post the combined numbers of
all those battalions all you really have
to do is tally them up
like all you literally have to do is
take all like you have to do two things
i have to prove to you these battalions
are neo-nazis or nationalists and then i
have to prove to you that the numbers of
the people who constitute those
battalions are
accurate uh
sorry i kind of zoned out at the second
part but the first part yeah correct
yeah
okay how would i be able to do that for
you
i mean you well for the first thing with
the numbers you specifically cited that
you had evidence you further said it was
actually no i'm talking about proving
that they are neo-nazis in the first
place you want the numbers first
you made the claim they were neo-nazis
yeah
right so that's on that's your burden
right you would have to okay
okay so is the azov battalion neo-nazi
yes yeah okay is the idarb italian
neo-nazi
uh i don't know what that is show me
something about it
okay where do you go i'm open
you can dm me i don't think you have me
blocked or anything
i can only dm
friends do you want to be my friend haas
absolutely not
okay
all right fine just put it in like
uh fact checking or whatever i don't
care all right so this is the idar
battalion you can just look at the
wikipedia and it's in fact checking the
eidar battalion is right here in
wikipedia
sure and we'll work just to clarify
we're working our way up very gradually
to 30 right that's the number that you
cited is that correct that's what you
said i said 10 to 15 000 of ukraine's
national guard out of 50 000 standing
military units in the national guard
right which would be 30 right and
compared to the ukrainian armed forces
at large
uh depending on whether or not you want
to combine standing and reserved
personnel that's up to you but we'll
just go with standing to be charitable
ukraine has 200 000 active military
personnel 200 000 active okay so that
would be
0.075 percent of the uk oh sorry i
didn't multiply by 100. don't believe me
on that one
7.5 percent of the military no this is
also something destiny did why do you
think that the conscripts
are what's going to define
instant what defines an institution's
ideological orientation
i didn't say it did i'm saying there's
not even material or relevant to an
institution's ideological orientation
uh of the number of conscripts it's
literally
kind of you kind of just fucked yourself
because if it's not relevant to the like
ideology of the institution you wouldn't
be fighting it you are using it as
evidence
but you're the one who asked for the
conscripts in the first place i never
attributed to them significance
that's a that's right the 30
it doesn't even i clarified to you
even before we talked about it that it
was like it doesn't even matter because
that's not what defines an institution
like that was very early on in our
argument about it you want proof of that
it's the 30 or whatever
um
whoever listed them list all the
battalions again and we'll just tally up
their total members yeah so the problem
is if you thought it it doesn't really
matter if i asked or not because you
saying in response to that question
because i remember i asked you
originally no it wasn't in response hold
on hold on hold on i'll you can correct
me in a second
when i asked you like hey haas you know
good bud if you think they're like
neo-nazis and denotification is one of
the many acceptable justifications for
russian military operations right what
what do you you know what you're gonna
point to azov right i said kind of
mockingly and you said oh well there's
more battalions than just azov you know
there's 15 000 fucking total standing
neo-nazi pieces of shit and i said okay
cool so let's get the evidence for that
right that's how the conversation went
down and i'm just pointing out to you
now wait hold on i promise okay hold on
then you said
after i said that you said
that that's not a majority and then i
said it doesn't matter if it's not a
majority if it's only ten to fifteen
thousand
um
because and then i made the argument in
question okay so now you're shifting the
goal post and you're saying okay i want
the evidence actually of the amount
right are you conceding that the number
well actually we can take a step back on
that one are you now saying that the
presence of neo-nazis in the ukrainian
military is not germane to whether or
not the ukrainian military is neo-nazi
at its core like has a fundamental
neo-nazi ideology or whatever that's
what i'm hearing hogan just a question
are you a fucking idiot
on tuesdays maybe it's today tuesday so
look at what you just said the presence
of neo-nazis what does what constitutes
that presence are we talking about in
the leadership are we talking at an
institutional level or are we talking
about conscripts because i'm not saying
that the evidence that's your claim was
that the government was neo-nazi the
state yes yeah yeah yeah so why'd you so
why even mention the conscripts at all
why give me a number i don't know i
don't know why we're talking you're just
confused you just randomly threw a
number you are the one who wanted to
talk about the conscripts i did mention
the several other battalions whose
combined total
is 30 30
number of conscripts of the ukrainian
armed forces are the conscripts evidence
for the neo the government being
neo-nazi no but the battalions are
that's what i'm trying to tell you it's
not about the conscripts it's about the
battalions right okay and the number of
total
the number of conscripts
that are under the battalions relative
to the ukrainian armed forces is what's
significant not the conscripts
themselves how many okay so you're
saying the battalions are the evidence
for the government being no nazis so how
many how many soldiers total are in
these specifically neo-nazi battalions
like all together
what i heard is 10 to 15 000. so the
exact thing we just went over for the
last 30 minutes is relevant then despite
what you're saying right because then
that is
hold on the denip euro okay finally we
got it dinipra battalion idar azov
ginipur 1 the kneeper 2 and dawn bass
volunteer militials uh a battalion is
that's okay so the minimum
is seven thousand uh
and the military analysts have claimed
that azov has gone to a brigade of three
thousand so there's at least ten
thousand we actually know it's at least
ten thousand we know of
i'm gonna talk about
a second fact-checking sure cool out of
a standing active duty military of like
two hundred we're talking about the
ukrainian national guard right now okay
how many which has been conducting the
majority of the operations
uh if not all the operations oh wait but
we just wait wait wait wait wait wait
just just two seconds we just went over
both the military
itself right the 200k figure as well as
what i thought you gave as the
total national guard
standing personnel which was 50k is that
correct what's your point
the numbers that i've been providing you
for the last 20 minutes are still
completely relevant
that it's only 7.5 percent
the 7.5 is the ukrainian armed forces
collectively it was 30 if you want to
just look at the national yeah so
what is significant
yeah what is significant about nearly
yeah what
sorry i just had to knock on your door
um yeah it's 30
just with the national guard that was
the point okay what is your point what's
the point of that i guess what is your
point that's still a lot you started
throwing these numbers at me presumably
as a way to further the claim that
well ukraine quote-unquote was a
neo-nazi country which by by which you
really meant the government is neo-nazi
uh like
neo-nazi idea when did i say ukraine is
a neo-nazi country
i mean that's that i said the ukrainian
state and more specifically the deep
state is nazified
right and you gave those battalions as
evidence by your own admission right uh
as one of the pieces of evidence for
that sure
okay so just let's just get down to the
nitty-gritty one of the pieces of
evidence you have for the ukrainian
government being nazi
is the fact that 30 percent of the
national guard aka 7.5 percent of the
total you uh sorry ukrainian armed
forces standing personnel
is
nazi
uh sympathetic or holds nazi ideology
according to sources that i have not
been provided including presumably the
russian government's own report so what
are what are we arguing about the
sources or granting that this is just
true
because if i provide you the sources i'm
sure you have an argument lined up right
okay so this is this is a source source
for the list of battalions
funded by kolominski who's one of the
ukrainian oligarchs wait but this is the
same gray zone article you said earlier
wasn't yours it's literally wikipedia
oh you're not you so you're not talking
about the thing that based
superstructure guy dude posted it's
literally something warlock just listed
on wikipedia
uh chris morlock
if you want to fall into question the
primary source is utilized by that
grayson article you're more than welcome
to i don't know why you're jumping on me
for for things that aren't coming out of
my mouth i didn't say anything about
like gray zone's primary sources what i
said is
look i'll just restate the problem okay
okay you are saying you are saying look
at both of them
i will in a second you are saying that
the ukrainian government
is a nazi government one of the pieces
of evidence for this claim is the
presence of neo-nazi you want to grant
me the fact and then make your argument
then
i mean i would have to look at i know
azov is neo-nazi i'd have to look at the
other battalions okay so are you gonna
grant change of facts
okay
but then make your own
i can grant it for the sake of argument
but even if i grant it right just
inductively right because of how like
probabilistic evidence works how
induction works
saying that it's it's going to be strong
evidence that the the government is nazi
based on
the presence of neo-nazis and 30 of the
guard and 7.5 percent of the ukrainian
armed forces together on its face is
just weak evidence even if you grant
that the evidence is okay that's what i
wanted to get to so the reason that's
not true is because
that assumes that there's an equal
proportion of relevance in the ukrainian
armed forces and turning in terms of
defining the power of the institution
and the exercise of power thereof but as
it happens he said again that was
confusing
that assumes there is an
equal that assumes that like every
single there's an equal level of
significance as far as like the number
of battalions and conscripts are
concerned in terms of how heavily they
weigh in defining the institution of the
ukrainian army i don't know why i don't
know why we're talk you said the
conscripts aren't what's important
what's important okay look just focus on
that seven seven point five percent
right uh-huh yeah
that assumes let's just do it in terms
of percentages then right so let's make
it clear i know you're a stupid person
so we're just going to make this clear
that
okay is that is there's 7.5 and then
there's
92.5 percent right
well in order for these and ever in
order for the 7.5 to not be strong
evidence
every percentage of the total has to
have equal representation and
significance
in terms of defining
the institution
for example for example
this is this is a complete tangent right
no offense look the point is seven point
five percent of the ukrainian armed
forces being nazi sympathetic
right you're trying to
why isn't that evidence i'm explaining
what you're missing is the connective
tissue here you need to connect that to
the idea that
the ukrainian government actually more
specifically the ukrainian deep state
still i don't even really i've been
trying to do that but you cut me off
okay fair enough so what's the
connective tissue there the connective
tissue is the fact that that 7.5 percent
has over representation in defining the
institution of the ukrainian armed
forces and in terms of as measured by
its activities so
now the claim is that the 7.5 percent is
in fact
i guess dictating the ideology for the
remaining 92.5 percent implicitly
more if we measure it based on the
activity of the armed forces yes
they are the vanguard
they are to quote one of the the
president of ukraine at the time um
poroshenko
the best of ukraine's fighters and he
was referencing the azov the other
battalions have also behind azov been at
the vanguard of operations in eastern
ukraine which has defined the majority
of the war that had been going on for
eight years against the so-called
separatists in eastern ukraine i think
you might actually be committing
i forget which one it is it's either the
composition fallacy or the opposite one
i forgot the name for it
but you're trying to sure you're trying
to extrapolate
without real evidence because you're
just i guess we're just talking about
like
implications now you're trying to
extrapolate 7.5 percent of the ukrainian
armed forces being
i guess explicitly a neo-nazi itself
requiring evidence that we still need to
look at into
the remainder of the ukrainian armed
forces and by extension the ukrainian
government and the quote-unquote deep
state is nazi sympathetic as a
consequence of that
no hogan the problem is that you're just
not a smart person yeah i i understand
we don't know let's just have a blank
slate right tabula rasa we don't know
first of all how significant that seven
point five percent is i am not saying
they are significant x nicolo
you and i right now arguing we don't
know right then why then that if you
don't know what the importance of that
is it makes it no i do know but not
within the context of the initial
argument
so there's two arguments being so this
isn't evidence for your argument then
hogan 7.5
nothing has nothing was clarified i
should say that's what i mean to say
nothing was said or clarified that's
what i mean we don't know we the
audience and you nothing was clarified
as to the question of how significant
they are now if every percentage of that
100 total is equally
proportionate
um then you would be right 7.5 is not
strong evidence what do you mean by
proportionate it seems like when you're
saying proportionate what you're meaning
is just the influence they have on the
collective ideology
yeah they're proportional
the disproportionate influence they okay
well that's that's that by its very
nature unless you have evidence which i
would love to see okay i have evidence
like that
battalion no no no listen listen to the
thing before you you assume what i'm
going to say
you're saying that that 7.5 percent has
a disproportionate effect on the overall
ideology why why am i saying that but
why aren't you doing that you appeal to
the i understand you appealed to the
quote you
referenced earlier no i'm not i'm
appealing to evidence that has not been
even brought up yet because you keep
fucking interrupting me i'm referring to
the fact
that the azov battalion almost
single-handedly recaptured cities like
mariopol throughout the duration of the
civil war you don't know how significant
these battalions are and that's
literally what i'm trying to tell you
you just don't know how significant they
are you're assuming they're just as
significant as every other sector of the
ukrainian armed forces
what they're not the facts show that
they're not no i didn't make that
assumption i just gave you the number
okay so why are you saying 7.5 is not
strong evidence when you don't know
whether it would be strong evidence or
not it would be strong evidence
it is strong evidence if seven point if
that seven point five percent was at the
vanguard of the their operations then it
would be good evidence i don't know what
you mean by vanguard
you're saying
in eastern ukraine for eight years well
that's just repeating your statement
what i'm saying is you're trying to make
like some implicit claim here that they
have like
a disproportionate influence on the
ideology and belief system of the rest
of the military and i'm just saying
not only has no reason been provided for
that other than the quote that you
referenced i guess even like like it
still doesn't show me that
all i would have to demonstrate do you
mind if i finish my salmon please go
ahead finish it it doesn't it doesn't
actually demonstrate that there's any
further reason to believe that the
initial claim which is uh that the
ukrainian deep state government is nazi
sympathetic
has been raised in probability to be
true right you're trying to make an
inductive case and i just don't see the
induction really panning out it's not
cogent i i did pogan because
i literally did
what do you mean i did
i didn't hear it yeah
only yeah it's like it's like only nine
percent of german nazis were were
committed actively involved in the
holocaust so what does that mean nazism
but like does that mean like it's not
strong evidence
the relationship between nazism and the
holocaust the reason that's disanalogous
is because
pretty much every member of the uh
german armed forces the vermont the
waffen-ss et cetera right the schwaffel
themselves pretty much every element of
them as a mere condition
of being sworn into the nazi party and
then whatever military detachment they
were sworn into had to directly swear
loyalty to adolf hitler a guy who has
explicitly said multiple times beginning
in like the late 20s that he fucking
hates jewish people right that's a
complete disadvantage that just because
he hated jewish people does not actually
mean
that they were directly complicit in the
holocaust no you're not understanding
the point the point is merely by me
being like a card-carrying nazi party
member
right you're swearing your loyalty to
the guy making these statements publicly
and being very very fucking open and
transparent about it
you don't even understand the analogy
i'm not even stating
the point is it's completely dis
analogous because i'm gonna let you
finish what you were saying just to
fucking prove to you you're wasting my
time so go ahead and finish your stupid
fucking sentence bogan
i'm actually a big fan of the game thing
that was cool finish it finish it finish
it shut finish it so you can shut your
pig mouth go ahead
yeah so the point is there's unless you
have some secret tape recording of
zelinski saying like
bro nazis are dope and shit my man uh
there's no reason to think that people
one by being in the ukrainian armed
forces subscribe to any sort of ideology
like that simplicator 2
that
because azov and of these other
battalions are referencing
are
supposedly as you claim
disproportionately influential in the
ideology that by extension
a majority or even a significant
component of the ukrainian armed forces
subscribed to anything resembling a nazi
ideology that's what we're missing we
need some code you're going to shut the
fuck up now all right because this has
gone on too long logan my analogy was
not about i'm gonna i'm gonna mute i
gotta mute this dumb fuck you're gonna
shut up you're gonna shut your pick my
pig mouth oink oink you're gonna suck
your pig mouth hogan
you're my favorite streamer pogen i
wasn't trying to say
that the situation with the german armed
forces relative to nazi ideology is the
same in in the case of ukraine i was
saying only nine shut the fuck up you're
getting muted you're getting fucking
muted there we go now the pig can shut
the fuck up pogen you have to very very
carefully listen to me like very slowly
i know you're a stupid fuck your brain
can't handle this so listen very slowly
trust me you're gonna feel really stupid
after i say it what i said is that if we
assume
nine percent of german nazis were
actively involved in perpetrating the
holocaust
the analogy is to the 7.5 of the
ukrainian armed forces but the object is
completely different one is about
neo-nazi ideology the other one is about
active involvement and culpability in
the holocaust
you made the assumption that what i was
talking about was nazi ideology in
germany these
neo-nazi ideology in ukraine it's not
what i'm talking about i'm talking about
the proportion of a total political
organization
or armed forces
can
in terms of percentages doesn't have to
be anywhere near a majority in order for
the institution as a whole to be defined
by them
those nine percent of nazis who
perpetrated the holocaust
defined
almost the entirety of nazism's legacy
as being responsible for the holocaust
despite that it was only nine percent
okay now analogously
not just because of them but analogously
if 7.5
percent of ukraine's armed forces
are neo-nazis it is possible not
necessary because that requires more um
explanation but it is definitely
possible that that five seven point five
percent can more than easily define the
institution of the ukrainian armed
forces as having nazi persuasions or as
something that's nazified so that is my
argument very simply now you can respond
to what i actually said instead of
wasting my fucking time yeah that
doesn't follow um the reason it doesn't
follow is because when you're talking
about the 7.5 percent of ukrainian armed
forces um that are like neo-nazi or
whatever right let's grant it for the
sake of argument you're talking about
people that though they may be explicit
in their beliefs and their political
ideology
the further claim that you're making the
one where you're talking about how
they're so influential on the rest of
the military is one that's just sort of
being thrown in there without further
cause or further explanation so i'll
explain why that's not the same as the
the vermonter like shutstaffer case
in the case of the vermont the schwitz
staffel the often ss right
uh those people not only by being
card-carrying nazi party members
explicitly subscribed to
um the ideology not relevant the
ideology is perfectly relevant no no
it's not the holocaust
not only do they explicitly subscribe to
the ideology of adolf hitler right by
being in the party they actually further
um were divided up into detachments
specifically tasked with carrying out
the objectives of the holocaust
etc etc so what you're saying is that it
wasn't only nine percent well i'm saying
that well unless you want to disagree
i'm saying that because those people
were card-carrying nazi party members if
they did not renounce their party
membership if they didn't like actively
take a stand against their orders i
think pretty much every german military
member is complicit in the holocaust to
a varying degree okay then why didn't
you just say that you're just saying
that has you were wrong about nine
percent so let me actually um rewind i
did i just use this then let's let's
rewind it by saving ourselves time and
using a hypothetical what if only nine
percent of nazis committed the holocaust
and 91 percent had no clue what was
going on would nazism's legacy still be
defined by the holocaust
yeah
why when only nine percent were carrying
it out uh because every every member of
the nazi military swears allegiance to
adolf hitler the guy carrying it out
okay sure so let me explain this to you
analogously okay
in the same way that in this
hypothetical that nine percent is
responsible you're not gonna say
zelinski's like like a nazi zelinski
doesn't lead the real ukrainian state
that i'm claiming is not sufficient
well that's important then because i'm
i'm going to go off wait but
initially i said the ukrainian deep
state i didn't say the official
ukrainian state and zielinski so let's
be clear that the ukrainian military
actually runs the government then please
hold on before we get there that was an
initial premise of this entire
engagement which you knew about so if
you want to talk about that we're going
to have to finish this one first okay
because you seem to got
gotten us somewhere without contesting
it that's actually not true what i could
what i conceded to was that the numbers
you threw out regarding the number
my claim is that the ukrainian deep
state and including the armed forces was
nazified now you're talking about
zelensky okay so you you've got that's
not true when i said do you think the
government is nazi you said yes that's
not true because the real government of
ukraine is nazified right so that would
mean if i said government and you really
meant deep state and i meant which i
clarified very early on and you did not
take any time to confess well we could
we can get into that but just to clarify
that doesn't mean like i'm prima facie
saying that i agree with the premise
that there is a deep state and that it's
run by the military just well but we got
this far without you challenging that
premise okay that's because we spent so
now we're going to get here so so
so pogan it actually doesn't matter who
the real president of ukraine is because
by analogy these neo-nazis
these neo-nazi battalions are a function
of the intentions of the ukrainian state
as an institution in the same way that
the holocaust was a function of the
intentions of the nazi party right
adolf hitler ran the uh the german
government right who what does it matter
who runs the government we never explain
the relevance
but it doesn't listen
let's say okay
let's say kermit the frog was the head
of the nazi party then it doesn't make a
difference as far as their culpability
in the holocaust does it it doesn't
matter who's running
i explained why it did the reason it
does the reason it has relevance yeah
and a further reason for this analogy is
again because
merely by joining the nazi party
right you are agreeing to uh follow the
orders and you swear allegiance to adolf
hitler okay sure so
merely okay so the by announcing you're
familiar with that right you're familiar
with like how nazis when they joined the
party they didn't swear loyalty to like
the constitution of germany it's a party
it's i know what a party is poland no no
no no no no it's small yeah it's a party
why would a party swear allegiance to
the constitution careful when the party
is not the state you dumbass it's a
party because because
the vermont right
when they become german soldiers german
infantry whatever
they don't swear like you know how when
you join the military in america you're
like i swear to protect and uphold
because the where mock belongs to the
german state you're not under you're not
a state and a party are not the same
thing you dumb fuck
that you're not listening to me when you
join the u.s military you go i swear
loyalty to the constitution of the u.s
and blah right when you became a vermont
soldier fairmont infantry you didn't say
fucking anything like that you said i
swear loyalty to god damn adolf hitler
and that was the point chancellor of
germany hold on almost done adolf
hitler's on stage for years prior to
this saying the jews are the problem you
swear loyalty to the chancellor of the
german state
are you saying that german infantry
soldiers did not swear loyalty directly
to hitler
yes because he was the champion
historically incorrect because he was
the chancellor of the german state you
are historically incorrect what am i
incorrect about they did in fact swear
loyalty i didn't deny that pogen i said
it's because he's the chancellor of the
german state get the shit out of your
fucking ears and stop wasting our time
you dumb fucking pig
so you agree they swore loyalty to
hitler yes who was the chancellor of the
german state
whatever but you agree they swore
because he was the chancellor of the
german state yes and he was an
anti-semite
yeah and you think like germany and yeah
we know he's an anti-semite you don't
have to say things we all know but the
thing is pogen the relevant point is
that in this hypothetical you just
agreed that if only nine percent of the
members of the nazi party
committed the holocaust right and 91 did
not
that doesn't change the nazi party's
culpability in the holidays i don't know
you're still missing the point the point
the reason why we would think the
culpability thing is different there is
because in the case of the vermont right
you just agreed yeah they do swear
loyalty shut the fuck up about the
weremock yeah i have to do like a from
scratch thing because you're just
confused at this point let's let's do
the cookie monster in genesis
we're going to do the cookie monster
genocide so elmo has an army of 5 000
people or he has a party of 5 000 people
and there's a whole specimen of cookie
monsters right so elmo
has only only two percent of elmo's army
or his party is directly culpable
receiving orders from elmo right
directly culpable in the genocide of
cookie monsters okay that still means
elmo
as in his party as an institution is
responsible for the cookie monster
genocide even if only two percent of
people are perpetrating it because it
expresses the intention of the
institution okay it's that simple
if you establish an analogy between that
and a situation where not only do you
explicitly swear loyalty to i forget was
it elmo or whatever well elmo sure you
explicitly swear loyalty to elmo and
elmo has been spending the last like 10
years really fucking railing on this
particular about cookie monks right yeah
yeah that's not gonna be analogous to
the situation that you're doing but the
thing is hitler did not
make the mass extermination of jews
public
well he certainly said that they would
that it was a problem that would have to
be solved right i don't know no one
knows no one knew it that no nobody knew
that was going to be the story
man
it's not that everyone knew that that
was going to be extermination
let's use your example right he gets on
stage elmo and says we need to solve we
need to answer the uh what is it the
cookie monster question how many
different fucking things could he
possibly fucking mean um one of one of
the one of the plans was the deportation
of jewish people to madagascar which is
still bad
right okay sure but it's not
it doesn't matter if it's good or bad
it's not relevant to the point use logic
but it does but see it does why the
point well because
you just agreed that's like a reason
because deportation to madagascar is not
the same thing as extermination camps
that's why it doesn't matter well i
agree with you there just they're both
bad sure but they're not the same thing
just relax for a second the reason it's
this analogous is because you're trying
to make an analogy between that and like
ukraine and these battalions but there
is no similar situation in ukraine
there's nobody in the ukrainian
administration we are talking about okay
okay
you would have to disanalogy i'm not
saying there's a a holocaust going on in
ukraine right now what i'm trying to say
you're very you're getting very close to
implying it no offense oh my god you are
genuinely a stupid fuck you're just like
not smart you're just not intelligent
i'm sorry you would fail out of law
school you would never even pass the
lsat pogen what i'm trying to say a phd
physicist it doesn't matter you're dumb
fuck you would not you would never be
allowed in law school pogen what we're
talking about is not whether there's
directly a holocaust going on in ukraine
we're talking very abstractly about
whether the numbers of an organization
or an institution can define its
intentions if 7.5 percent are neo-nazis
what you have to prove is that their
neo-nazi character is merely incidental
and that the institution is deploying
them for ends that are not themselves
defined by the neo-nazi ideology no no
no no the point is you were trying to
establish an analogy between ukraine as
it exists today with all these
battalions and nazi uh no i i i gave up
on the nazi thing because i know you're
a dumb stupid fuck with shit in your
ears so i gave up on the nazi analogy
and i made up my own elmo cookie monster
thing okay so you agree
no it is analogous but you can't
understand the analogy so i tried to
simplify the analogy for you why is my
objection to the analogy wrong because
you are making it seem like i am
claiming the analogy is along the lines
of their actions being the same thing
rather than the question i didn't say
that yes you did you said well there's
no genocide or there's no holocaust
going on in ukraine right now the reason
i cited for this analogy you started
with this analogy because hitler was
knowingly he was known to be an
anti-semite and everyone in the armed
forces had to swear allegiance to it the
dis analogy is that when they became
vermont or whatever they did yeah can
you can you look on my stream because
i'm gonna just microsoft paint this for
you because you're a stupid fuck like
you need visual learning so let's just
do visual learning right i'm actually
i'm well probably open the open
okay so we're going to do this very
simply right i just want you to
understand
we're going to do this very simply so
here we have all right we have hitler
um hitler's open anti-semitism
right
hitler's open anti-semitism
all where
ma whatever all
army
all army swearing allegiance to him
okay this is how the analogy is
based on each layer okay all armies
swearing allegiance to him and then a
proportion
committing the crime
genocide right
okay so one two and three right let's
label them for you you understand i'm
not looking at this well you can look at
it there's no excuse for you i can't you
literally can i have an etch a sketch
okay someone take a screenshot of it
when i'm done and post it in the discord
so you can see
there's two you have such good fans
thank you so one two and three right
then we're to do this we're going to do
this one right i don't know ukrainian
government
ukrainian government
ideology irrelevant
just uh just so i know haas what's your
like what's your bedtime
roughly
no i'm explaining this to you irrelevant
that wasn't my question
it's 11 p.m on the east coast man
irrelevant
um
ukrainian armed forces
answering
to state let's just say ukrainian state
so we're less uh
ambiguous entering to state orders
to
a my mom's portion
being i'm just telling you now a
significant proportion being neo-nazi so
as you can see we have these labeled one
two and three right so one here is one
so
a significant proportion being neo-nazi
is analogous
to the proportion committing the
holocaust okay
and the reason it's analogous is not
because it's a new haircut the reason
the the the reason they're analogous
pause for a second i've got them
sorry go ahead continue please so do you
concede the debate
what no so have you lost are you unable
to comprehend what i'm trying to say
well they just posted it for me so let
me read just hitler's open anti-semitism
swearing
allegiance uh fucking proportion
committing the crime
ukrainian state ukrainian armed forces
answering to state orders significant
proportion being neo-nazi
wait a second why is the official
ideology of the ukrainian state are
relevant
um because you cannot extrapolate from
hitler's open anti-semitism
a necessary conclusion
at least at the time as far as the
soldiers in that army knew of the
extermination if if the analogy i didn't
say i didn't see it hypothetically
i merely said that he was like
explicitly anti-jew and had expressed
that he wanted let me explain something
to you now it used to be very common i'm
gonna explain something to you i'm gonna
explain to you
it's not going to sound relevant at
first but you're going to see why it is
okay in in old europe anti-semitism was
very common you understand though that
that shut the fuck up and let me finish
this yeah
i'm just okay
with the pig i'll music
okay
anti-semitism used to be very very
prominent in europe the reason
it stopped being as open or prominent as
it used to be is because of the
holocaust which means in no way was
hitler's open anti-semitism or ideology
enough to know he was going to commit
the holocaust it was a huge shock and
surprise to the entire world which
changed the nature of how anti-semitism
was received forever
okay that's what i'm trying to say am i
unmuted hello yeah you're unmuted now
sick so the point of me bringing that up
when you express the analogy initially
just to correct uh the record because
you strawmanned me is to point out that
there's a significant difference between
7.5 percent of a standing military um
engaging in neo-nazism explicitly and
therefore somehow magically esoterically
having an influence on the rest of the
standing military that's i i can
describe it just let me finish come on
you've been talking all night and such
that they're partial to the ideology of
neo-nazism right versus
uh a military that is very explicitly
subscribing to the ideology because the
guy they're fucking directly swearing
loyalty to has been saying for like
years that the jews are a problem that
they need to get rid of right that's the
reason to think it's this analogous
because if you'll recall your initial
claim at the outset of all of this was
something to the effect of well i think
the ukrainian military slash deep sorry
ukrainian government slash deep state uh
is is a nazi institution and the reason
i think that at least one reason
at least um well sure fine but one of
the many reasons that you suppose uh
supposedly have to believe that is that
these are there are these battalions
which
are neo-nazi and they're somehow
influencing all these other
just so you understand right
you you see why that would be just
analogous if
if conditional right if the claim
is that somehow we're supposed to
believe that at its core the fucking
ukrainian deep state government whatever
you call it is an explicitly neo-nazi
institution
you understand why that's a problem if
you're if you're doing like an induction
okay it doesn't follow no
can you can you actually like i hogan
i've listened to you very very carefully
because i want to rip you apart you
don't listen to anything i say so listen
very carefully pogen
there's two prongs listen very carefully
two prongs listen very carefully if you
want to even have a chance in this
debate two prongs the first one it is
not true that i claim that they
magically influence the ukrainian armed
forces as the 7.5 percent i've been
trying to explain how they do but you
keep cutting me off i would be more than
happy to give you more examples of how
this influence and how the mechanism of
this influence is concerned but the only
thing
shut the fuck up because i let you talk
pogen i let you fucking oink oink oink
like a pig for a long time so let me
talk now all i wanted to do is prove
that them being 7.5
alone does not discount the possibility
of that influence i was more than happy
to name you examples
of that influence okay
the second
the second point with respect to the
analogy there's two prongs to this the
second point is that that is making the
assumption that hitler's anti-semitic
ideology was known to be the
extermination camps of the holocaust
which it wasn't
did you know that what
i'm six foot three
i don't know so you don't say cedar
because you absolutely do wait so you're
conceding hold on so you're conceding i
didn't concede i just gave you my
rebuttal and that's how you respond
you're refuting a straw man how would
like what do you want me to respond what
is the strong how is it a straw man the
straw man is saying that i ever at any
point was talking about just uh genocide
explicitly when i merely said all that's
necessary for the analogy to break down
is that in one case they're not
explicitly subscribing to some ex
ideology and in the other case they are
that's simple but the analogy was not
along the access of the ideologies which
i even muted you to clarify hey easy
cowboy this isn't fucking modern-day
debate okay just chill out the point is
that's sufficiently dis-analogous to
make the point break down because you're
trying to let me know when you shut the
fuck up let me know when you shut the
fuck up oh i'm happy too yeah uh that
you're trying to say that's reason to
think that like um we can conclude that
the ukrainian deep state is somehow
explicitly neo-nazi but you haven't
actually presented some sort of
analogous reasoning
the analogy was not you just saw the
microsoft paint look at it again i am
not comparing the subscription to
neo-nazi ideology in ukraine to the
subscription of nazi ideology in the
german army are you going to tell me how
cpi was ever looked like i'm i'm so are
you hogan the more snide remarks you
make the more you're you're admitting
you lost this debate
for you to respond to the point i
actually do i have to mute you if i mute
you will you listen to what i say
i mean you're attacking a straw man
you didn't even hear what i said how
would you know if it's a straw man or
not how could i not hear you you've been
fucking screaming into the mic so pogen
i'm not comparing ideology
of nazism to the in germany to the
ideology of the neo-nazism in ukraine
i'm comparing the holocaust
just as an abstract analogy about how a
minority of the people in an institution
can do things or or um
have positions already in the german
case that's the point okay okay okay
but hypothetically if it was you already
conceded that it would define the
institution's intention
even if it wasn't a minority of the nazi
party or the or the institution of the
german state whatever you want to call
it if it was a minority in a
hypothetical scenario you yourself
conceded that it would make the nazi
party and define the nazi party as not
only culpable it would be defined by
that action yeah but the point is even
in the elmo cookie monster whatever the
fuck case you tried to present the same
exact analogy just with different
pronouns right it's the same exact setup
right
how many times have you interrupted me
in this if you want pokemon hold on i
can let you talk uninterrupted if you
can commit and promise to do the same to
me how about that
sure okay then don't interrupt me again
i won't interrupt you go ahead
yeah i think i've explained several
times what the dis analogy is um i'll go
over it again because i think the
audience is like uh kind of paying
attention just a teeny little bit um so
here we go you're trying to say that
there's this 30 component of the
ukrainian
uh national guard
7.5 of the overall standing military and
this is supposed to be representative of
the ukrainian deep state being
explicitly neo-nazi right and in order
to present this argument you did an uh
analogical reasoning with
uh nazi germany and you were appealing
to like um you know the vermont and the
military and whatever but the problem is
this right unless you have some other
piece of evidence you'd like to supply
in the ukrainian case nearly having
these 7.5 percent uh
of the of the overall military be
neo-nazi does not implicitly or
explicitly mean barring a further
argument that the rest of the ukrainian
military is neo-nazi sympathetic in the
case of germany not only
are they like obviously in an
environment where the entire regime and
government and everything has been
cultivated
such that they're subscribing to nazi
party ideology they actually explicitly
swear allegiance and loyalty to
uh adolf hitler a guy who for like five
to ten years has been railing against
the jews very publicly and very
violently and very explicitly which
means in the german case we do have
reason to think that the german standing
military would very very
very likely be sympathetic to the
ideology of hitler in the ukrainian case
we don't possess the same reasoning
hence the dis analogy please proceed go
ahead okay so i want you to actually
listen carefully because you just looped
again and i'm gonna explain to you why
you looped it's very simple okay
now first of all i am not saying that
just because 7.5 percent are there
without any further details or context
that this means the ukrainian armed
forces as a whole as neo-nazi the
context of that 7.5 is what's decisive
to the argument here and what they
actually do and what they are for in
regards to ukrainian armed forces okay
that's what i
made that very clear from the very start
second of all i never actually
discounted that the whole of the let's
say german army during world war ii was
anti-semitic or was sympathetic or
subscribed to hitler's ideology on
because they swore allegiance to him
what i
made very clear though was that
subscribing to hitler's ideology at that
time was not necessarily the same thing
as committing the act of the holocaust
and the extermination of jews and in the
camps okay now even if it was for as a
matter of historical fact just refer
back to my hypothetical in which this
wasn't the case and in which it was only
two percent and 98 percent had no idea
it is not true that see what your your
issue pogon is that you're trying to
make it seem like i'm saying
that the german military
vis-a-vis nazi ideology is the same as
the ukrainian military vis-a-vis
ukrainian neo-nazi ideology that's not
what i'm saying what i'm saying
is that
the
perpetration of the holocaust
relative to the institution of the nazi
party assuming only nine percent were
culpable or directly perpetrating it i
should say
is relevant vis-a-vis the 7.5 percent
and the reason i'm saying that is not to
draw the conclusion that it's
necessarily true that just because
they're 7.5 percent that means the
institution is going to be defined in a
certain way the point is it is more than
easily possible for 7.5 of an
institution to define the nature of that
institution
not even just the ideology but even when
it comes to moral culpability in actions
your inability to hear this argument
probably reflects the fact and you have
to focus really hard here pogen you are
genuinely a stupid person you are not a
smart person
simple as that
are you done yeah
yeah so it's i i never you straw man to
me again in that rebuttal i never said
it was like the holocaust in terms of
extermination right i merely said that
all that would be necessary for some
member of the german military uh to come
to the conclusions that i'm referring to
what
are they conclusion i thought we weren't
interrupting each other
is to just come to the it's just like
pay attention to any one of his public
speeches that even remotely mention the
jews for over the course of like five
years right they agreed with his
ideology and the party line at least on
some level you could infer that merely
by agreeing to be a part of the party
because as you and i agreed they swear
loyalty to hitler who was the chancellor
right and he's not very quiet about what
he believes
with respect to the jews
and the problem there is is exactly what
i've been pointing out as the dis
analogy this whole time the ukrainian
armed forces you can't make the same
inference that they agree with the
ideology and the party line merely
because of the evidence that you
presented which was just the 7.5 percent
or 30 percent right you have to supply a
further argument to think that that
ukrainian deep state is a nazi into
institution if you're using the
existence of these battalions as
evidence for that you haven't given an
argument um that's the dis analogy you
straw man me again with the holocaust
extermination thing i never fucking said
that logan hogan pogen you're four foot
seven i'm six three pogon
that's okay it's okay you conceded pogan
i'm gonna repeat this
yes you did you did you did concede to
me because i made it very clear that no
one denied
that the german military was
anti-semitic or agreed with hitler
ideologically it is not under contention
what is under contention
is the question of their culpability
in the holocaust in this hypothetical
and it's a hypothetical pogon stop
talking about the direct thing because
the directing doesn't matter just
imagine
look okay don't mention the
germany again because you're confused
about it talk about my elmo and cookie
monster analogy it is not relevant what
their ideology was in this case because
the object of relevance here
is about the holocaust not the ideology
we we all agree that they were all
anti-semitic and they agreed with
hitler's um views about jews and all
that kind of stuff that does that is not
a one-to-one uh that doesn't allow us to
draw the conclusion that they directly
perpetrated
the holocaust and that is it's simple as
that do you agree that saying that i
think like standing members of the
german military subscribing to the
holocaust in terms of extermination
like like you agree i never said that
right
if you're not saying that
then you're not saying anything relevant
to that if you concede to me that
then why are you bringing up that they
you agree with me
to get you to clarify because that was
the crux of that was my analogy my
analogy was with regard to their
proximity to the perpetration of the
holocaust not their ideology no no the
conversation went hey
i don't think there's reason to think
the ukrainian deep state is nazi based
on uh like nazi sympathetic or a nazi
institution based on this evidence right
and then we cited the numbers the 30
national guard the 7.5
and then at that point you threw out the
analogy with germany you're like oh okay
pogan so you think oh you don't think
like uh the german military was like
nazi sympathetic just because nine
percent actually participated in the
holocaust i didn't say nazis i did not
say nancy sympathetic what i said was
no i didn't no no i don't because i did
not say whether they were sympathetic to
nazi views i said whether they were
directly culpable whether more
specifically the nazi party is defined
by the holocaust
yeah and i never said that just so it's
about institutions and people wait wait
that's the straw man i never said merely
by being in the german military that i
think like every single fucking person
was signing up to participate i'm glad
you don't think that i'm glad you don't
think that but you've just conceded hold
on because you said i did that's the
straw man that i've been playing no no
it's not that's not what i said you did
i think you're like no
what you were saying was that they
weren't signing up for the holocaust but
that they were signing up for hitler's
ideology which is true but that's not
relevant to my analogy i just don't
understand why you're so upset when i'm
the one trying to tell you what i
actually said and you seem so like
befuddled because what you said
does not address my analogy
yes it does directly no it doesn't
because
you just contradicted yourself nowhere
in my analogy am i equating perpetrating
the holocaust with subscribing to the
nazi ideology at the time still confused
the dis analogy is the difference
between
making some sort of inference about 7.5
30 whatever having a neo-nazi ideology
and the ukrainian deep state being an
explicitly nazi institution versus
people participating in an institution
that is not only open about its
political ideology yeah but but in order
i'm almost done remember we're not
that's not one just don't finish that
because i know what you i know what
you're going to say pogan it's not
relevant to the analogy
why can't you follow your own rules go
ahead waste waste waste our time forward
you're a very forgiving person i thank
you for that the point is by joining the
german military by being in the vermont
the ss whatever uh by being like a
card-carrying member of the nazi party
what have you there are two relevant
differences there that are not going to
work in the analogy the first is that
you know damn well
right what hitler thinks about the jews
the second is you are explicitly
swearing loyalty and allegiance to that
very fucking guy yeah neither of those
things right exist in the case of
ukraine yet you're trying to say that
this is some sort of analogical
reasoning that you can use to conclude
that the ukrainian government slash deep
state even explicitly neo-nazi
institution it just doesn't work that
way my friend
okay i'm gonna be very quiet and careful
with you
that is not my analogy pogen my analogy
is not about nazi ideology it's not the
ideology thing is not relevant to
anything i've said i said if nine
percent of the nazi party committed the
holocaust only
that's still going to define the nazi
party as an institution
as a holocaust committing institution
okay if 7.5 percent of the ukrainian
armed forces are neo-nazis that has the
possibility and why i'm not saying
by default because again you may make
the argument that the neo-nazism is
incidental to the overall aims of the
institution but it has the possibility
definitely of defining the institution
of the ukrainian deep state
as nazified that is literally my that is
what i said from the very start you
talking about the ideology of the nazi
party and the ideology of the wehrmacht
is not relevant it's spoken before you s
loop in like an npc say the same thing
you've said the same things dozens and
dozens of times what you said is not
relevant to my analogy and my analogy
has nothing to do with the ideological
loyalties
of the nazi party or the wermacht it has
to do with their actions relative and in
in regards to the holocaust
are you done yeah
when you throw out evidence like there's
x percent
neo-nazi battalions whatever
right
when the original claim is something
like ukraine's government deep state is
explicitly neo-nazi
what you're saying you're performing an
induction right i'll walk you through
this you're saying that that raises the
probability of your initial claim being
true right you're supplying it as
evidence and yes
i thought we weren't interrupt
why because you're wasting your friends
here only with added context wait just
just please i i beg of you sultan has
the cruel please allow me to finish my
claim
thank you now you're merely saying
though that it's possible when you
appeal to the uh when you appeal to the
battalions that um the ukrainian deep
state is like neo-nazi right so you're
actually walking back the initial claim
because you're no longer performing an
induction at all you're merely saying
you're invoking some sort of weird
possibility okay just for clarity just
for clarity are you saying it is
evidence for ukraine being deep state
neo-nazi or it's not evidence with added
context it is evidence in a vacuum it is
not evidence but we're not operating so
the thing we've been just to clarify the
thing we've been talking about for like
an hour
is not evidence unless you supply other
evidence no i don't need to necessarily
just supply other evidence i need to
address the context of that evidence if
you are not comfortable supplying this
as evidence on its own like in a vacuum
as you said why not merely invoke the
other evidence instead of arguing with
me because it's not about other evidence
it's about knowing about the what the
actual context of the evidence so pogen
you claim you have a phd in physics so
you're used to working in vacuums that's
fine i was joking okay well sure but
that's not how real life works real life
is not like physics where it's all just
vacuums real life is actually
not everything
i was joking real life isn't evidence in
a vacuum all evidence in real life is
oversaturated with context and that
context is crucial to the very structure
of that evidence okay
so
in the case of
well okay on its own 30
being neo-nazi isn't enough but when you
add the actual context of that 30
or that 7.5
it does actually add
uh to my argument it does add something
like i said but it adds to the overall
picture hold on it adds to the overall
picture that i'm painting
which we haven't even had you haven't
even let me discuss more details about
that because you've been focusing on the
seven point five percent well it's
because i was correcting straw man's and
planning oh you weren't because you were
saying the 7.5 percent is not strong
evidence well how do you know it's not
when you supplied when you supplied an
analogical argument i broke down that
argument you didn't hold on pogo you
told me that
you broke down nothing you broke down
nothing because i proved to you
either you never comprehended the
analogy or you were just wrong about it
sorry you broke down nothing pogan i was
having a moment because my favorite
streamer was yelling at me the point is
if you spent so much time trying to
supply an analogical argument for this
piece of evidence only to then come to
me and say
actually in order for it to be effective
evidence it requires further evidence
which is what you really mean by which
is no not no it's not what i mean by
context exactly come on don't fuck with
me
no other other evidence is is like
factually verified discrete datum
context relates to the actual structure
of evidence now you don't know the
distinction of those things because
you're either not a knowledgeable person
or you're too much of a fucking idiot to
put together what that could possibly be
dunbar's number is a defeater for
communism then by the same token i don't
know what that is
really you don't think like the presence
of russian sympathetic or soviet
sympathetic people in donbass
or whatever
can work in the same exact way that
you're appealing to with respect to
these ukrainian neo-nazis the presence
of ideologies that
justify some sort of sorry
am i denying that the people in donbass
are overwhelmingly sympathetic to soviet
ideology and communism because i'm not i
didn't ask if you were denying it i'm
saying do you think the same sort of
reasoning could be applied
uh
yeah why not
oh okay
so then it's just wait what form of
reasoning
well presumably ukraine doesn't want
them to like secede or be i think that
in the same way that ukraine is neo-nazi
as i'm the ukrainian state is neo-nazi
by the same thing that hasn't been
defended okay but by the same standard
you could also say that the donbass is
sympathetic to soviet ideology i would
never no no no that's that's you can't
say that like the statement one
the unique uh ukrainian deep state
is
neo-nazi whether it's
is irrelevant hold hold hold the train
statement two donbass
is possibly or sorry donbass is like
russia soviet sympathetic rather than
being explicitly soviet okay then let me
rephrase it that's actually
okay in the same okay i think i think we
should rename the stream infra dis
analogy that's more fitting i gotta be
honest
sultan
i can't think of unfair you are
such a fucking idiot it's baffling let
me rephrase it then in the same way that
the ukrainian state is nazi sympathetic
the donbass is soviet ideology
sympathetic or let me rephrase he
predicted the examination hold on hold
on shut the fuck up let me even predict
it even further right in the same way
that the ukrainian deep state is
nazified that the donbass republics are
sovietized i have no problem saying that
so what you deemed as like an essential
which you deemed as an essential
component of my analogy which was the
key word sympathetic proved itself to be
entirely inessential pogen you would
fail the lsat you'd never be allowed in
law school you are genuinely a almost
naturally stupid person i mean you still
have provided an analogical argument
that doesn't bear out or why not
probability well we've explained that
for the last hour wait but hold on pogan
you asked the two factors that i
presented in the case of germany right
are absolutely not relevant crucial no
the ideology thing was not
wait wait don't say that because that's
sorry burp that's dishonest they're
absolutely crucial and relevant because
you're talking about whether or not we
can come to some sort of justified
conclusion about the ideologies held by
each respective regime no i'm not the
people i am not talking about and by
extension the people that serve i am
talking about the nazi party's
culpability in the holocaust not its
ideology no what you said was if you
think that 7.5 percent
of the ukrainian armed forces being
explicitly a new nazi is not reason to
conclude that the ukrainian deep state
is a nazi institution right what do you
think about and that's when you threw
the nazi german no hogan the thing is
that's not what i said exactly
hogan's
sure the the record supports me though
the only thing that saves you on twitch
is i'm not allowed to say slurs so that
understand that
yeah
i'm talking about you know like the r
word
that's okay i can't call you the r word
that's okay listen pogan wow let me tell
pogan let me tell you something i don't
think you're my favorite streamer
anymore i don't care logan let me tell
you something okay what i said initially
is that just because they're seven point
five percent doesn't mean it can't be
strong evidence it depends on the work
in the morning it depends on the
structure of that evidence it depends on
the structure of that evidence just
because it's 7.5 percent doesn't mean
it's not strong evidence because the 9
in the nazi party in a hypoth or elmo's
army let's say that was decisive an
exterminating cookie monster or whatever
or i don't know
what's in other characters uh big birds
or whatever right that
in no way actually watch sesame street
it seems like you're just a larper that
in in in no way does that discount the
strength of that evidence it depends on
what that 7.5 percent is doing you can't
say it's not strong evidence unless you
know the context in which that evidence
is being presented the reason it's
we'll go over it again i understand
people work on things
yeah talk again about the nazi ideology
please go ahead
well the reason to think it's
disanalogous analogous jesus i'm tired
the reason to think of this analogous
once again is because there's two
crucial factors that are being added in
the case of germany that are not present
in the case of ukraine such that they
would dramatically influence the
probability of the conclusion then then
forget about germany and use my sesame
street exactly so you agree it's just
analogous thank you
no it it's not this analogous because
yes the essential token
it may as well be a hypothetical because
the essential component of my analogy
has nothing to do with the history
i appreciate the token the logan hogan
it's not this analogous because the
essential components of the analogy can
be distilled into an abstract
if you're arguing for a negative right
you can't prove the nazi like the
ukrainian government isn't nazi
sympathetic so gotcha pogan right no i'm
not i would really
i would more than be happy to move on to
illustrate more evidence in the
direction of the government being
notified
come on look
no i'm not hogan i i'm opening listen
pogen you're saying 7.5 is not strong
evidence i'm saying it is strong
evidence when you actually one of the
reasons i don't think it's strong
evidence can you repeat them to me
because you're trying to put the numbers
in a vacuum nope wrong
why isn't it strong evidence cracking
anything so why isn't it why isn't it
strong evidence because the two crucial
factors that would dramatically raise
the probability of the conclusion being
true you cannot substantiate in the case
of ukraine
what are the two necessary factors we've
gone over that about nine times wait so
you're now you're trying to make like a
a necessary analogy in which it would
have to be the same it's a necessary
analogy when we're talking about
probability because what you're trying
to say now is you're trying to say
unless uh the german armed forces bear
the same relationship to the ukrainian
deep state officially which is obviously
impossible because the deep state is not
official to the german armed forces in
regards to the nazi party or hitler
himself
this isn't correct either so those two
factors are what swearing allegiance uh
to the ideology
and what else you no no listen there are
factors that you presented in an
analogical argument to substantiate what
are the factors i presented
exactly over that they're the two i'm
referencing the only factors i presented
that were essentialized in my analogy
were this
a minority of the nazi party whether
it's true or not what do you mean by
essentialized
like it's literally this simple a
minority of an institution can easily
define the character of that institution
huh
that has nothing to do with the analogy
though wow analogy was that well because
you were trying to say because okay if a
minority of nazis i guess
if a minority of nazis commit the
holocaust that is more than easily
enough
for that minority to define the
institution of the nazi party oh no no
that has nothing to do with it but
that's what i said but that's what i
said initially you're getting scared and
you're like
that's what i said initially bogan who's
scared of what that's what i said
initially
[Music]
it's okay listen the point is you
presented an analogical argument right
an analogical argument is designed to
increase the probability of a conclusion
being true
why because there's analogical
properties such that if you think
something's true in one case you would
have to say it's true in the other case
or at least be compelled to say it's
true except what did i say exactly we're
getting there trust me and provide
evidence of what i said please put it in
fact checking no no get a clip of
exactly what i said and put it in fact
get the clip so we can look at the
evidence of what i said
you said in the case of ukraine there's
the 7.5 whatever battalions that are
neo-nazi therefore it increases the
probability of the ukrainian deep space
space wow the ukrainian deep state being
neo-nazi and you analogized this to the
germany example where there's people
joining the german military and even
though it's a minority of people
involved in like the holocaust or what
have you right um you can still conclude
that you know the government is
sympathetic to that agenda or the party
ideology i'm denying that
i'm denying that that i said that
well i mean that's just i don't know
what to say to that because you admitted
you admitted something pogan what
actually happened was first i pointed
out the over-representation of neo-nazi
battalions in the ukrainian national
guard okay then you said well that's
only seven point five percent of the
total so that that's not strong evidence
and i said well incorrect incorrect no
that's not all i said that's that's what
else did you say
when i said that it was merely seven
point five percent and i added the
strong uh it's not strong evidence
statement i gave a reason to think it's
not strong evidence right what was your
reasoning it's not merely the number
it's the number coupled with the fact
that and this is where we've gotten into
trouble you know my analogy didn't start
don't mention the analogy don't don't
get emotional just listen right try to
listen for once
guys this one let me let me guys this is
what happens when i don't yell
this is what happens when i don't yell
over these fucking soyboy pieces of shit
cucks is that they constantly fucking uh
gesture around and they do this fucking
bullshit brogan finish what you were
gonna say oh chad okay sure thank you
anyway point is i didn't merely say it
was the number that made it weak
evidence i said it was the number
coupled with the fact that you're trying
to make a claim like that an induction
without the connective tissue such that
the never has any bearing on the
probability of the deep state uh
ukrainian deep state being neo-nazi and
then remember let's let's
keep track here remember you then
presented the analogical argument with
germany and i said well haas that's dis
analogous x y z reasons and then you
lost you like lost that would be nice if
it was true but it's not because what
actually happened was that you just
looked back and we can look back when
you asked me for connective tissue i
didn't respond with the analogy i
responded by actually giving you
connective tissue about the overwatch
i talked about maripole in 2015 i gave
you plenty of connective tissue at the
time which you just completely ignored
and then i said pogan there's nothing
it's more than possible for 7.5 percent
to be able to rep define an institution
just look at the case
it's more than it's hold on hold on hold
on
no it's about possibility because it's
more than possible so it's possible okay
well congratulations yeah it's more than
possible it's possible a victoria's
secret model is going to walk in the
door right now and blow me is it more
probable
be based on some evidence that you're
supplying or is it just possible okay
let's uh the you're claiming it's
improbable right or whatever you said
that that's seven point five percent
that's that's you said the seven point
hold on pogan hogan what you said is the
7.5 is not strong evidence where's james
when you need him go ahead
you said the 7.5
is not strong evidence
that's correct yes yeah but i didn't
make it but then you asked me for
connective tissue i gave you connective
tissue and i coupled that connective
tissue by saying there's nothing about
it being seven point five percent
that is that indicates that this is not
r uh as uh proportional connective
tissue that you offered was an analogous
no it wasn't the connective tissue that
i offered was the azov taking monopoly
in 2015. don't get emotional
you are a fucking liar the connective
tissue i offered was the
overrepresentation of these neo-nazi
forces in ukrainian armed forces help
don't get emotional please all right are
you okay pogan twitch tls is the only
thing that saves you it's the only thing
that saves you hogan are you are you
implying a death threat you're a pig
you're a pig you're a fucking please
[Music]
you sound like a fucking laughing hyena
little bitch bogan you've always been a
little bitch bogan ever heard of that
how you fucking fat pig
i gave you connective tissue you ignored
it i supplemented the connective tissue
so giving you an example of how a
minority can drastically define an
organization just because it's 7.5
percent doesn't mean it can't be strong
evidence you just need to contextualize
the evidence that's what i fucking said
you haven't addressed a single one point
of my fucking argument not once have we
made any fucking progress because it's
just stupid to fucking understand what
i'm even saying
pause
chat
infrared it's been a fantastic evening
manhood conceded get the fuck out
[Music]
go ahead and run away little bitch
i'm still in the vc though okay so are
you not leaving then
i have uh work at 8 30. i don't give a
fuck
okay
yeah i'll get fired for you haas you're
my favorite streamer
you fucking pussy can i make a statement
or not are you gonna let me no you can't
make a closing statement you either
debate me or you don't be honest debate
me or run away you little bitch
i am debating you no you're not you're
running away my position you're running
away i was going to summarize my
position
you have no position you're not okay
with that what's my position oh awesome
okay what's my position ahaz tell me go
ahead
your position is that you're unable to
understand
any of the arguments i've actually
forwarded throughout this entire debate
that's you think that's my position
that's what you have that is objectively
your position you should people outside
of your chat take you to be a serious
person i actually don't give a fuck
i i can tell yeah most people have like
at least some degree of like dignity if
you measure this like mathematically i
want like any formal standard of victory
in terms of measuring our debates with
regard to logic
[Applause]
all right uh take it easy ak four foot
seven have a good evening fat fuck okay
you fat ugly fucking pig fuck
you fucking fat putt fucking pig oink
oink more pogon
fat fuck
ugly fat pig fuck
imagine fucking getting destroyed that
badly
don't try to fucking out lawyer me don't
try to get in the weeds of arguments
i'm sorry guys i took the lsat cold
and got in a pretty good law school
and in this fucking law school i didn't
study once
i'm built for this shit don't fucking
come and get into the weeds of a fucking
argument with me
you dumb fuck especially if you don't
have a lawyer brain yeah all he could do
is his fucking mcu reddit quips
that's all he could fucking do such a
pussy
such a fucking pussy
by the way guys all that fucking
bullshit they do all that fuck all the
entirety of that fucking bullshit
it's because of shit like this i dissect
and tear apart viciously my opponents
viciously
all they can do is cope and lie all they
fucking have is they're lying and coping
that's it
that's all they can fucking do cope and
lie