🔴 RED NEWS | PUTIN NUKES! | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES 🚀 Infrared Content Catalog

The I was a fire and no one could save me by you switch what

design will make foolish people do

I never dreamed that I meet somebody like you.

I never dream that I lose somebody like you.

No, oh, like you like you like no You see more I'm

I'm seeing Make it You can you pray

It's make me feel this way

what a wicked thing to do

so let me dream of you

what a wicked thing to say what a wicked thing to say?

Never felt this way.

What a wicked thing to do?

Make me dream of you and know no, no, no. Oh, no.

Oh, Thank you. One

One

I'm No one

could One was on fire, but no one could save me by you.

Strange what desire would make this people do I never

dreamed that I love

somebody like you

like you

like

I never

dream that I remember somebody like you.

No, no. If you're in With you I'm not I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm

No

I'm

love turn out of Turn out Turnahoon, you

You're my tire

Yeah, we're feigned,

today, until morning, come

Turner, let's turn shriein,

Danny is on the line, we're not going to be overby, shedleaddle sun's cry that the night is and I'm not over by

shrieglet

like a

sunkener

and we

dance

here in

cold in winter

land

every

shirk of

this golden

glass

but the

world

to us

a little

halle

up

with the bust in the breast and the feet in the heart

Do you make high by every trance?

Your laughing clippins me like in my eyes.

We both are the perfected

Bandsen.

Turn a ho, you are my cheyre

Yeah, we're freer

Hurt here, till morning

And Tala-O,

Laudeau, let's the clock shine

Tendie,

The night is on the morning not

not not in the It's all right now It's far back The

The entire world And our And our Our steps And our Our steps And we Let's the kettle lights in the whole world

And our

Chances

Furns

Hany up

We're letting

Let's lose

Because

And the

life is

A great

Fett

Tala

I'm

I'm your

Yeah

we're

Fearn I'm We're Fearn I'm your cheyreye yeah year and

I'm after a lot while and down town ahone

i'm

we're feigned

today

down let us all the sound shrie then the night Yeah, we're feigned, today, to the morning down to hang a horn,

let us out of

shriek

because the night

she is not

long not

not yet I've nothing left, nothing left, nothing left, nothing left, and my soul

soul

so

so I'm not my soul So my soul So soul, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so,

blind, go blind, go blind, go blind, go blind, go blind, go blind, and I've nothing left, but my soul, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so.

I let my circle around.

Coatne, good life, could life.

I let me so cup blind

Ilet most

ucal away oh

I'm

a lot so supply my circle line Sue Sue So

So My circle blind

So

So So

And I My circle

line

And I

Let

My circle

blind She is around

And I My circle

For donkeys

She used my life

She is my life She is my life

She is my life

And my life

I'm no longer

try to resist

I'm no longer try

I no longer try I no longer try I no longer try I no longer try I no to try I know how to try

I know how to try

I know want to try

I know how to try

I know how you try

I know and try

I know what you're trying

dine, dine,

dine, dine, dine, dine, dine, dine, good time, time, die

dine,

dine, dine,

dine, This is my My

It is my

This is my

This is No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Oh, it's my, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no's mine. It's mine.

It's mine. It's mine. The Death is mine, is mine, is mine, is mine.

Is mine. It's mine My My

Toes

My My To attend

At last

I'm

I'm I'm at the I'm

I'm

quietly the

in the

new

my

my my

my

my my

I'm

my

I'm

I'm to

I can

I the summer with with with you with you know I'll go to the inconseigneur To start To start

To start

Discover the moon

Venus

Without any

Abscue

I'm gonna

Omblayer

Our men

You'd

Would you

Would it

Would you

If you

If you'd A ca missionary, if it would a Caesar.

The P.A.

S.

Envoy, I'm going to be in order.

I'm in two cents and second.

The Pia!

S.

S envoy, on the air,

I'm going to send a second hour. I'm going to be in love. I'm sorry, I'm interested

without a second hour.

Thank you. I love me off, I love me up, I love me all, I love me all, I love me all.

I love you, let me up, I love you oh love you oh love you love you love you my love you love you my love you love your love your for the grand ascension, the whole

the exas,

the world of

all the pastions

of the name

immortal,

it's the arm

in conclusion,

it's a quess

a spiritual

bubbled of

a detection

so the

and we're

on it's on a man It's strong to slap me off Some boy you're all Let's know. Let's know somebody on the other.

She's on the street of all this song and a second place.

Let me know.

Somebody on her.

I'm sorry.

Yeah. Let me out. So, let me out. Oh, that's see something.

So let me out.

Let me out.

Oh, let me out.

Let me out.

Let me out. Let me out

I love me out

I love you

love me out

I love me on

I love you

love me out love me out But let me

Oh

Oh, let me on

Lape ya

Oh

Laia me on

And let me

out

Down and

love me

love No I'm down ever thought

boy in the eyes

down never thought

boy in the eyes Boy and me are I Oh Thank you. The The The The You know, I and I'ma Saba'an, I know,

I'm gonna, nina,

nina,

I'm,

I'm a

that's not,

I'm

Nita, oh, and I'm I'm not I'm

Nottani

Nina, Nina Nita

Nita

Nna

Oh

Nina Nna

Oh

Oh Mug

Gau

N over the face of the shalt disown and see

every

you know

and

how about

and

I'm and so you're

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm gonna

I've got

I be

I've got I'm gonna I'm going to be able to say that I'm talking about the shep not all.

I'm gonna be a-n-na-oh,

oh,

I-n-n-n-rida-n-na-n-na-n-a-oh,

I-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n--n----l. I'm gonna be Nita Ninao, oh,

Nal-N-N-N-N-N-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-A-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-, so s'a-notti chan-a-n-n-kand-a as i'm a-kundi-lis-chchampanatlii, and then-nalli, na, nina o,

Nani, Nina, Nita, oh, Nna, Nita,

oh, oh, Nna, Nna, oh,

oh, Ina, no, no, no.

I've been, I'm a chal dis-sum-suit-ta,

but I'm so we've got, and I'm not every single

I'm sorry

I'm going to

see what and so you're going to I'm

so

I'm

I'm The The and you know

the The The and you want to be a lot of it.

I don't know.

That's a new

one. and I'm

and

I'm and

I'm

I'm I'm I'm and I'm and the uh...

I'm

going to

the and we're not going to be. I'm not going to be.

I'm going to be.

And I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm a lot I'm

a

I'm not I'm

a

I'm I'm I'm not I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm gonna

and

I'm

a God

I'm I'm going to get you

I'm going to

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm Oh Oh and the and Hello everyone. I know it's late, but it's also Thanksgiving tomorrow.

And if you are still being forced to go to work on Thanksgiving, your boss is a piece of shit, and you should take a shit on their desk.

First thing in the morning, 5 a.m.

Porco! What's going on?

What's going on, Porco?

So, and you could tell him I told you to do that.

You could tell them I told you to do that.

You can tell them you were sent by me.

Well, guys, I couldn't. I was going to skip tonight's stream but i have so much on my mind i

have to get it out i had to communicate this um because i really wanted to talk about it tonight

and uh i'm gonna...

So what do I want to talk about exactly?

My shirt is open.

Ah, very, very harmless mistake.

I mean, even if it was... very, very harmless mistake.

I mean, even if it was, even if my shirt was like totally open, it's not like it's a crisis.

It's just bad form.

But that was a completely innocent thing.

And I appreciate that it was a completely innocent thing, and I appreciate that it was a completely innocent,

meaningless mistake I had made.

Anyway, I wanted to get this off my mind so I don't forget about it.

Buffalo!

What's going on?

And I don't know if I'm going to be streaming Friday.

So this may be my last stream of the week until Sunday.

So it's important.

And, well, you've noticed a new pattern.

It's going to continue where, you continue where I'm starting to talk about

the revival of the left wing a lot

and I'm starting to reflect a lot

on 2015 and 2016

with Bernie Sanders

and I know almost

everyone here is a Bernie Sanders OG and I want to have I want to just be clear about

mistakes that I can see coming that I don't want us to make and the first mistake I don't want us to make. And the first mistake I don't want us to make, and I want you to listen to this very

carefully, I want you to be very attentive to what I'm about to say, and I don't want

this to go over your head. I want you to listen very carefully. I don't want this to go over your head. I want you to listen very carefully.

I don't want us to make the mistake of somehow thinking that Bernie Sanders could have succeeded in 2015.

And that is a really hard pill to swallow, but he couldn't have.

Even if he had broken with the Democratic Party, he couldn't have won.

So let's just get that out of the way.

He could not have won.

Because it has a lot to do with the primitive state

of consciousness within the movement that he was building and there wasn't enough time to really bring

that to its conclusion.

So I want to be clear about something.

The victory of Maga was historically necessary as far as the development of U.S. history is concerned.

And I don't want people to

think, I don't

want you

to think

that we're now

you know,

abandoning

the original

insight of

Maga communism

in favor of

this rose-tinted

classes,

glasses of

trying to revive

you know justice democrats

or Bernie Sanders or

2015-2016

you know

progressive left-wing

populism and i'm going to explain exactly why um there was something

fundamental about maga that we need to take for granted going forward because what it really means to abandon the Democratic Party is to take for granted

the irreversibility of Maga.

That's step one.

And that, so, so it's not a split from the Democratic Party that we're pursuing.

We're pursuing a new, potentially a new party that will split from both the Democrats and the Republican Party.

And that's an incredibly important distinction to keep in mind.

I always keep in mind logo who always talks about the importance of republicanism, not the

GOP, but just in general republicanism

why he prefers to be a republican over a democrat

uh...

semiotically right terms of just what those words mean and connotes

and logo is correct in some sense those words mean and connotes. And

logo is correct in some sense.

The defect of Bernie Sanders in 2015, 2016,

was this extremely naive universalism. It was this extremely naive, um, all embracing, all loving,

kind of completely blind to the concrete realities. And I think that's exactly why it was so easily

subverted and hijacked by the woke stuff and by identity politics, because it was an

empty and abstract universalism, not a concrete one.

And so it was like a death by a thousand cuts to oppose Bernie Sanders to the concreteness of race and sex and sexuality and all these kind of things that were more immediate.

And Bernie looked very weak, and he was weak, because he was, because that movement was not able to propose a concrete collective subject that serves as the context for like what are we fighting for and who is we who are we right and historically speaking that is what maga actually

accomplished maga um for better or for worse, irreversibly, was an acquiescence to the fact that the universalism of the United States, well, not just the universalism of the united states

well not just the universalism to be clear

the integrity of the united states on a fundamental level

had collapsed

now liberals like to jump to race and this conclusion definitely resonates with people in terms of, you know, people being duped by the media that it's about race, but it's not about race.

It's not about race. It's not about race. It's not even about nationalism. It's not even about America as a nation

within the narrow frame of nationalism or nation states.

It has nothing to do with ethnicity.

And it has everything to do with the concrete reality of America's economic reproduction as a as a form of collective existence.

And that is something which is ultimately rooted in the blue-collar American working class.

And it's something that's rooted in America's integration in the global economic system of its own creation.

And it's something rooted in America's trade policies and industrial policies.

And that reality is what is concrete.

And that is the reality that

blue collar workers who flocked to Trump in 2015,

2016,

were seeking to address and give recognition to.

So if we associate republicanism with this kind of like real politic, concrete self-interest versus abstract moral universalism typically the

Republican Party is associated with corruption because it had historically

represented the interests of businessmen business owners owners. So it's a directly private particular

interest in the form of businessmen who want to make money, right? Whereas MAGA kind of

changes that, where instead of the particularism of businessmen, it's the particularism of America as an economic totality, not the global system necessarily, but American manufacturing and industry the the American worker and their interest, their

concrete interests of just being able to put food on the table. And so that is the stuff out of which countries and nations are made, by the way.

They're not made by blood. They're not made by ethnicity.

They're not made by any abstract notion of nation.

Stalin, if you read his writing on the national question, he outlines exactly what makes a nation.

Common language, a common territory, and a common extent of economic existence.

And I think one of the biggest problems with Bernie Sanders-style leftism, if we want to call it that, which was a thing that arose from within the Democratic Party is, well, it more or less is Reddit if that makes sense

it's very Reddit

it's very much

good on paper

good sounding

good feeling

but it's inauthentic

at the level of what it actually communicates and means in reality itself. I don't know exactly how I'm supposed to communicate this. But I was thinking about it today because I'm just thinking deeply and reflecting on this.

And when you think very deeply, you have to think in stupid ways as well.

So I just thought, and I was like, you know, when a li-tard

is at the gym

and sees a guy

in a MAGA hat

that's

that communicates more

that speaks more

it says more

than anything a Bernie Sanders style leftism could communicate.

What do I mean by that? Like, forget about prescriptions with respect to policy forget about overt ideological commitments forget

about anything that it is conscious that can be consciously communicated

somehow objectively some class antagonism is being very deep, visceral,

class struggle and class antagonism somehow communicates itself.

We're like the Libtard looks at probably a blue-collar working class person who just

doesn't care about the rules of the institutions, doesn't care about the neoliberal respectability.

They just, there's something, it's like an instinctive, visceral reaction that it provokes.

And it says so much, that situation itself, that sociological encounter.

And, you know, Bernie Sanders was never able to communicate something like that.

He never had a MAGA hat.

As superficial as that sounds, he never had a MAGA hat as superficial as that sounds he never had a maga hat anyone could say that

bernie sanders is a wholesome guy who's you know who's good um even msnbc and and Hillary Clinton, they could do that.

They could do that.

And what would their criticism be?

Well, their criticism of Bernie will be like, well, but Bernie is not doing enough about,

you know, sexism or, you know, oh, well, he's just too naive and he's, like, not realistic enough.

But he never had a Maga hat that spoke for itself and didn't need to defend itself at all it just spoke for itself the closest that it got was the title the label burney bro right and bernie bro was not something that the Bernie movement embraced unapologetically.

Had they done that, maybe it could have gone in that Maga Hat direction, I don't know, of just something that self-ev evidently and by itself triggers the libs.

But this sounds extremely superficial. It sounds so like shallow and superficial and stupid and like small-minded.

But this is the key to how everything works for human beings. Symbolism, a signage, a sign in reality. That is what operates at the level of the unconscious. That's what operates at the level of the unconscious that's what operates at the level of our actual authentic material realities you can you can um profess any kind of position that you want but what is what really is your position though like you can say

something but like what are you really saying you know there's always a dual meaning and i feel like

maga communism makes so

much fucking sense

when

you are honest

about the secondary meaning,

the unconscious meaning.

And the whole point

of Maga communism, I try to explain it in like millions of different ways.

Like people just don't get it.

Even you got, some of you guys don't get it sometimes.

But like what it's really about, Ron Swanson, what's up?

What it's really about is how the ground zero of politics is not based in overt conscious formality or conscious commitments and proclamations with respect to policy or this is where I stand, this is my ideology, here it is.

Like that is, that has no, that is not the level in which political semiotics is operating at. You can, like, say, oh, yeah, I'm an

anarcho whateverist, and I'm a this and I'm a that. And then the semiotic significance of what you're saying at the register of the unconscious is you're just a fucking Democrat libtard, right?

So it's like there's this new realm of political reality that maga has introduced which is open in terms of the the theoretical

or conscious or ideological implications because it's just more fundamental than all of those

things it's far more fundamental than all of those things. It's far more fundamental than all of those things.

And every time

people critiqued Maga communism

by trying to reduce

it to some kind of theory

or some kind of conscious notion,

it's like they didn't get it.

They didn't understand that we're trying to acknowledge a reality

that is just not fundamentally primarily conscious, right?

And it's no surprise that a lot of the people, you know, did have mental disabilities who were the most, well, there are two categories of people, frankly, that had the strongest reactions negatively.

People with mental disabilities and people from the UK, such as Tess Owens from the Guardian.

And it's well known that the UK, just look at the autism rates per capita compared to every other country on earth.

And they make things like Doctor Who, and they, you know, they have that thing going on over there.

Like Mr. Bean.

They just have people like Mr. Bean

who just don't get it.

Everything is just very overt.

They just don't get it.

Anyway,

and Maga communism was very American

because it was just

not something that cared about defending itself at a strictly formal or completely conscious level.

Right.

Now, frankly, what I just said is just facts look it up if you don't believe me m i6 lost their

mind over it they still didn't understand they think it's the dark magician Alexander Dugan's

Necrum sorcery or something.

Anyway,

to continue what I'm saying,

so the idea, like, is that Maga is this new

opening, and it is very

brutal and painful to be humble,

not simply to the fact that all the rednecks and backward people or whatever

are, you know, you need to lower yourself to their level geographically and culturally and whatever. That's very direct. And it's not just that Marxist, self-proclaimed Marxists and socialists and self-proclaimed progressives and leftists have to humble themselves to the fact that they were just fundamentally outflanked by people

who were ideologically the opposite of them, it seems like. I think more fundamentally,

the humiliation of taking the L on Maga for leftists and just accepting the truth of Maga is accepting the primacy of this unconscious reality of unconscious, like, semiotic registers, just profoundly eliding

reducibility to our conscious and overt comprehension of what politics is, whether we

try to

reduce its

policy or

ideology or

something else,

and understanding

how consciousness

and ideology

and policy

are all

subordinated to

this more

unconscious register of political struggle and political reality.

And there's something very, very psychological about that. There's something incredibly psychological about it that makes our work much more

difficult in today's era because you do need a kind of psychoanalysis to understand it.

You do need a way to kind of...

It's very much like...

Not only is it

something new within politics,

it is itself

a grenade thrown at

conventional ways

of making

understand

it's so

like hard to explain it's like

okay on the one hand

you have maga and on the other hand you have

the conventional institutions of neoliberalism

and that distinction is enough

but in addition to that, part of the institutionalism of

neoliberalism is a specific understanding of politics itself. And it's that understanding of politics

which Maga also directly

undermines. And Maga

communism was really trying

to communicate that fact.

Right?

Like

even the underst, a real conflict is not when there's two sides on opposite parts of a field a real conflict and this is to paraphrase shezek a real conflict is when there's

a dispute and a disagreement

as it pertains

to the very mapping of the field

itself. That's real

conflict. If we can

both agree on the battle space

that we're on, and we can both agree that you stand there and I stand here, we are not actually engaged in war in its fullest and most complete sense of the word.

We're engaged in a game, And a game at minimum is where both

players accept a bare minimum of common rules and common reality. But a real war is when there's a disagreement as it pertains to the actors and the content of the battle space itself.

That is an objective war. That is just war objectively, right? That's not war. That's not a

gentleman's agreement. That's not a gentleman's skirmish. That's not a duel between gentlemen.

That's a war in the highest ontological

or metaphysical sense of the word. And that such war is what Maga communism sought to communicate.

That that is what Maga represented in this country.

And it has apps, because we have lost the ability to authentically reflect our political reality in this country.

And that is so interesting to think about.

Like the reality on an unconscious level, it's like class struggle.

Blue collar workers, you know, walking into a diner and like fucking salaried office workers

and a banker in one booth

just like oh

and they just feel uneasy and there's tension

and it's like a such a visceral instinctual

class conflict between the Maga hat and the so-called progressives, right?

But then when it comes to reflecting that in our consciousness, everything is the opposite.

The Maga guy is like, oh, you're a damn

Kami, and you're like, and I want to be like

Malay and yeah, we should just, you know,

give all of our wealth to capitalists.

And the banker is sitting there, like,

actually, I'm a socialist ecological and like I believe in

equality for all and I believe and like that is so that is such that that needs to be honestly

engaged with

even if you don't agree with

Maga communism

the fact that this has become a fact

of politics in this country

that we have lost the ability

to honestly and authentically reflect our actual

reality and consciousness is a real issue and a real problem that should be honestly and soberly, like, engaged with. Instead of doing what all the leftists did instead, which is change their understanding of class itself, such that the salaried banker is the proletarian and the blue-collar guy is now bourgeois and that's what they did to cope with the fact that our consciousness just doesn't reflect reality anymore.

It just doesn't.

Yeah, you can lie about reality to make sense of your false consciousness

and say that, you know, Bill Gates is the true proletariat

and, you know, people in Carbondale,

Illinois or something, are all

the bourgeoisie, and that

indebted farmers who are literally

broke, who

have nothing, are

petty bourgeois

but you know

a prostitute is

a proletarian who does

only fans you can lie to

yourself

to cope with your

false consciousness or cope with your false consciousness

or cope with the fact of the predominance of the false consciousness

but everyone can see that's what you're doing you're just lying

you're just lying to everyone it's an objective fact

that consciousness, political consciousness, no longer aligns with political reality.

And that is what Maga communism really was trying to say.

Like, some fundamental, like, it doesn't matter what the content is.

It doesn't matter what you fill the content with.

Let's just acknowledge the fact that there has been an acute separation between these two things.

And we can talk about the causes. Like, we live in an incredibly psychological era.

We live in an incredibly psychological era. We live in an incredibly psychological era.

We live in an incredibly libidinally charged era where the most intimate desires and fantasies of people.

Like that, everything is running wild and running amok and people are starting to look

politics is becoming sexualized red versus blue is just man versus women it seems like and that's how

intimate it has become that's how intimate it has become.

That's how psychological it's become.

And that is the true matrix when you think about it.

The true matrix is the cybernetically fueled fantasies that perpetuate our narrow individualism.

And to escape the matrix means under comprehending that rummaging through all of this trash and you have to rummage through it

at the end of it is an impersonal completely fundamentally impersonal collective reality but

though impersonal one that still hasal, one that still

has contradictions, one that

still has conflicts, one that

still has content.

It's not an empty, flat

space.

There's still shit going on there

even though it's not personal. and i feel like that's really hard for people to comprehend

like class struggle is not personal it's a struggle it's historical something is going on there

but it's not something that can be reduced It's historical. Something is going on there.

But it's not something that can be reduced to an individual's extent of consciousness or desire or subjectivity for that matter or imagination.

It's something that is existing beyond the threshold of our

individuality, but which nonetheless

is fundamental to our existence

and explains everything

about our various symptoms.

So,

and I think what Bernie Sanders' message back then in 2015, 2016, was basically like, you know,

yeah, I'm just going to, every, we love everybody everybody and it's everybody coming together about love.

And it's like it didn't acknowledge conflict.

It wasn't able to acknowledge conflict.

It wasn't able to acknowledge something going on, something going on in Tartarus.

And that something going on in Tartarus took the form of Maga.

And Maga didn't come out of nowhere.

It reflected a deep, telluric, volcanic movement within the history of our country.

And Bernie was like a cuckold,

completely blind to it.

You know? Like a cuckold, really.

Um... you know like a cuckold really um so we cannot return to that we'll never return to that and let's be clear the significance of bernie dee what's going on brother appreciate it the significance of Bernie what's going on brother appreciate it

the significance of Bernie right

was

more so exposing the dnc than anything else and all of the based things about bernie and his movement

were actually the straw men that his enemies were projecting on him.

That's what was based about Bernie.

Like the Bernie bro thing,

I hate to say this,

but a lot of Bernie Sanders bros were just like fucking stupid potheads.

Like stupid college kid potheads, straight up.

Like, they weren't real bros, all right?

But Liptards invented

this image of the Bernie bro

that was much more politically

potent than the real one,

right?

And,

um, um, and um so

maga should be given credit work

there's no yeah the chapboid retards

like there is no

going back to

old Bernie Sanders

style pile it had to lose

it had to fail

there's no going back

um

so we're talking about a post-maga left wing to be clear. I want everyone to be clear about what I'm actually trying to communicate. It's a post-Maga left wing. It's not a pre-Maga left wing. It's a post-maga left wing. It's not a pre-maga left wing.

It's a post-maga left wing.

And there's no going back to the and being nostalgic.

And that's also why we shouldn't trust Jank.

We shouldn't trust him because now he's just starting to get it.

And we are much more advanced than Jank.

Don't like

underestimate how much

Maga communism was ahead of the game.

And keep that in mind, all right?

He should be following our lead,

frankly.

Frankly, he should be following our lead, right?

Okay. Now, that being said, I'm not saying we should be dismissive of these new developments.

It's not what I'm trying to say, but I just want us to be clear of that.

Let's not pretend like, you know, it could have gone any other way.

Let's not pretend like there was a good old left wing and it got ruined by the woke mob.

That's just, that's kind of a Zionist myth, frankly.

When I say good old left, I'm talking about in the 2000s and 90s.

There was a good old left in the 30s and 40s and 50s, but that's long gone.

You know, I'm not here to say that, oh, yeah, we had a good Bill Maher left, and then it came and got ruined by... No, I mean, there was something fundamentally wrong with it from the beginning.

When it comes to the neoliberal Bill Maher or whatever leftism

but

um

and I think

let me tell you about another blind spot

of Bernieism guys

another blind spot

was that Bernie

was never a real

anti-imperialist

let's keep that in mind

and

there is a false

anti-imperialism

that opportunistically accompanied Bernie which was based in this idea that anti-imperialism is just rooted in moral compassion when it's not. There's a concrete content of anti-imperialism which has to do with my you know i talked about it in my

speech in the free america to free a palestine event called the occupied states

of America where the American global

system has destroyed our popular

sovereignty. So one of

the things that was missing in Bernie's

movement, and this is the key,

instead of saying Bernie doesn't care about

the third world and moralizing about that,

what we should really say is that it's not just economic populism. It's not just economic issues.

It's also political issues pertaining to the state, pertaining to the occupied

states of America, pertaining to the fact that we don't have a republic, we don't have a united

republic, we don't have a republic we don't have a united republic we don't have a sovereign republic

and maga is the one that focused on the political side of things more than anyone else

did they do it sufficient no no i'm not saying that tell me why Maga, tell me why the thing about

abolishing the FBI came from Maga and not the Bernie Sanders camp. Well, there's a reason,

because we're not just fighting for health care and economics. We're fighting for a republic. We're fighting for a democratic republic in the Leninist sense of the word. We're fighting for a Soviet republic, an American Soviet republic.

We're not going to call it Soviet, but you get what I'm saying.

The allusion is directly to Lenin, and Leninism.

The political struggle is important.

The struggle for sovereignty is important.

It's fundamental.

And that was completely missing.

That was completely missing from Bernie Sanders style politics.

And it's also missing from Jank politics.

TYT politics. It's missing from all American politics, besides MAGA itself.

Just raising the question of sovereignty, raising the sovereignty question Thank you. it'll call you

you conspiracy night

yeah but you know

I'm really thinking and reflecting on this, because it's like, I remember in 2020 where all the parapolitics retards, all the parapolitics retards came out of the woodwork. But why did they?

Because they started to become conspiracy theorists because they're like, oh, what's going on with the Democrats and how they're screwing over Bernie?

And they like, that's how they came to the surface.

That's really where it came from.

So even there was an acquiescence to the sovereignty thing, even then and there.

And I think one of the reasons they hate us so much, the parapolitics people, is because they're not willing to make the final step and just be like, yeah, there is no popular sovereignty in America, and MAGA was just an acquiescence to that fact.

They're still kind of like, I guess, here's how Bernie can still win.

They'll never admit it, but that's really where they are mentally.

What if Bernie tells followers to join DSA?

Well, DSA is not a political party.

It's not a party.

Keep that in mind.

DSA is a club for Liptards to meet together and be liptards.

You know, I really can't stand how personal politics is in America.

I hate how it's just a... It's just so reduced to, like,

cultural outlook and like temperament

and testosterone levels.

And I think the difference decisively is like, can you think for yourself, or do you just

fucking acquiesce to whatever the TV tells you.

But then like,

politics is such a fundamentally impersonal reality.

That's just, like, in Russia, they don't have

this. They don't have this in Russia.

They don't have this

in Russia because in the Russian Civil War,

it was men with guns

shooting and killing each other

and all having to go through

yeah what it means to live in a

real life you know

there's no

snowflakes none of that there's nothing

like that it's like everyone

understands we're fighting for the future

we're not fighting over, you know, whether veganism is correct, lifestyle choice or not.

We're fighting over the fucking future of the country.

And today, that's not the case.

Today, it's where I'm fighting over my lifestyle.

I'm fighting over my habits.

And that's so tragic and disgusting to me because,

I wish people could rediscover this real left wing that's like,

not based in your personal feelings of like loving everyone but is like an objective position you know i

watched a show when i was young it was hbo's rome which was a very good show but you know what i

liked about that show what What it correctly communicated?

Even I, young as I was when I saw it,

I liked that show because, like, all of the fucking warriors,

all of the warriors who were real motherfuckers were left

wing. They're like, yeah, we're

with Caesar. Fuck these plutocrats.

Fuck these aristocratic

pieces of shit. Right?

We're on some real shit.

And then

the, you know who were the fucking, like, effete, libtards who had low T and all

had gyno and were all estrogenic?

The fucking, the, um, the optimits like Cicero and that peto old man Cato, you know, they were like all gino-ridden

pussies like Lindsay Graham

and then there was

the left wing was a muscular left wing

of soldiers

and like

what happened to that

because that used

that actually was the norm for like all of modern history i'm not

just talking about HBO's rome was getting that from modern history right do you what do you guys

think like in the 1930s your average New Deal supporter versus your average Liberty League supporter, it's a market difference. Market difference. And, you know, these are not aesthetics.

I'm not talking about aesthetics.

I'm talking about honor.

I'm talking about what it means to live on some real shit instead of some fake shit.

Real ones know exactly what I'm talking about by the way you just know some shit is real

like who are you gonna fucking run to

when there's nobody to tattletail to bitch

stand on some business and have some honor

who are you gonna fucking go to

when there's no one to snitch up

you know who are you gonna go to

when you're not you know nobody gives a fuck

you're whining you know

for example like on some real understanding the brutal nature of life itself.

And we have to be fake about that and lie to ourselves?

No, fuck that, you know?

So it's like, that's why it's important

that's why it's important and like i get it the Democrats kind of understood this.

And aesthetically, yeah.

They were showing a guy in a truck in the car that they hired to go on TikTok and be like,

I'm going to tell you guys right now, I like Kamala Harris.

And Trump is a traitor to this country.

And what they didn't understand, that it's not about aesthetics.

It's not about the look.

It's about the real shit behind the look.

Right? Sleeper's...

You can't fake real shit.

You cannot fake

real shit, you know?

And then the

Trump stuff, Kamala's never gonna be

in November. Like, that's some real shit. I'm not

going to lie.

You don't, if you understand, you understand.

It's like, yeah,

the blue neck shit was totally fake.

Kamala's never, that was some real shit.

And the real shit is just like, we don't give a fuck about all this explaining you have to do.

We fucking want to see the results.

We want to see shit get done how shit really is.

You know, Biden was ruling us for four years.

He's fucking senile and it's been a disaster.

That is real.

You don't need a blue neck. You don't need to get a redneck in the car pretending to be authentic to just, you don't need that because it's a real honest position about the actual reality, you know? And people don't understand this, but traditionalism, traditional roles, traditional aesthetics, whatever you want to call it, that's just a reflection of truth. It's just a reflection of, it's just an authentic reflection of reality it's not something that

needs to be faked or contrived it's actually just an after it's a symptom of

something more real than it Thank you. so there's no going back to Bernie Sanders.

There's no returning to that.

There's no...

... having nostalgia for 2015, 2016.

Let's give ourselves a little bit more credit than that, you know. and and by the way, breaking from the Democrats is introducing the political struggle, because it's a two-party duopoly.

And if we're going to reintroduce the political struggle

it has to be anti-imperialist

there's no other fucking way

the two-party

duopoly is connected at the hip

to imperialism

it's natural to be an anti-imperialist if you're fighting for a new political power in the USA, which is what a third party would be doing.

Just by saying there should be a third party, right? And I know movement for a people's party tried to do that,

but they got wrecked internally, very quickly.

Would we consider running on a Republican Party line?

No.

No, like I said, there's a political realignment,

and the idea is that there's going to be a big tent party that probably draws from some Democrats and some Republicans and a lot of people who are neither in terms of representation.

But it's it's not about creating a green party that is for disaffected democrat voters it's not about when when you say neither democrat this is a thing guys we need to keep in mind when people say i'm neither democrat nor republican

the question you always want to ask them is, oh, which neither are you?

What do you mean?

Are you a neither Democrat nor Republican Republican or a neither Democrat nor Republican Democrat? Because when leftists say they're

neither Democrat nor Republican, what they really mean to say is that they're a neither Democrat

nor Republican Democrat, meaning objectively they trially side with the Democrats and sympathize with the Democrats and associate with the Democrats and sentimentally they're with the Democrats, but they're just whining about their disaffection with the party.

And the same is true on the other side, to a lesser extent, at least.

Yeah, Democrat with a small D.

That's what the leftists are.

They're Democrats with small D's.

They're not officially

pro-democrat, but you know, low-key.

They're still on the side

of the fucking Democrats.

Like, in reality.

That's what I'm trying to, that's what

Maga communism was trying to say.

But what about in reality, though,

on the unconscious level?

Because you notice these knee-jerk reactions,

Trump gets elected,

and they're going to protest.

What the hell are you...

Why, I weren't...

protesting what?

Like, on the low, there's still Democrats, but they're just not willing to take responsibility for it.

Like, on the low, they're Democrats.

But they're just not taking responsibility for it.

And that's unconscious.

It's not conscious.

It's unconscious.

And I am exhausted trying to

explain the unconscious to people. I just feel like you should

fucking get it if you're being honest. And if you're autistic,

please wear something that says, please be patient with me. I'm autistic.

And just admit that it's your blind spot that you just don't see between the lines.

And that's fine. There's nothing wrong with that.

But I'm sick of pretending 90% of us can't. Like, how come so many of these I'm not a Democrat leftists?

After Trump won, they're like,

ah, guys,

what we should have done, it's like,

who, wait, who's we? Why are you, why are you like with the

Democrat, like, why are you like on the low

with them? Like, we're just supposed to all implicitly be on the same page. Well, on the low with them. Like we're just supposed to all

implicitly be on the same pay.

Well, on the...

Well, fuck you then, bitch.

On the low, I'm Maga, bitch.

On the low, I'm Maga, then, bitch.

You want to talk...

If you want to be on the low about shit,

I'm the opposite of you unconsciously i

fucking hate you libtards you're my enemy i see you as literal enemies whenever i see you

and consciously we're saying the same shit.

I'm saying fuck the Democrats and fuck the Republicans.

And I see you saying that oftentimes.

But you see how we're still enemies a lot of the time?

Because there's something going on unconsciously there's something going on

on the low right

we're saying the same shit consciously

but on the low clearly you're not committed to what you're saying.

Am I going to fucking lie and say that I'm not biased in real life, that I prefer a person in a MAGA hat 99% of the time over someone with a Kamala shirt?

Should I lie? Of course I do. Of course I prefer them. So no, it's not the same.

They're not the same.'re not because the Maga person

99% of time

is on or let's say 85

to be more

you know fair

85% of the time

is on some real shit and the fucking person in the

Kamala shirt is a mentally ill libtard that just screams at everyone and scolds

everyone. Fucking Harry Potter libtard.

Narcissist.

Complete narcissist.

A Twitch mod who bans me.

You know, like that's what I see.

Yeah. me, you know, like that's what I see. There's some crazy magatards out there.

That's true.

But, yeah, that's true.

But most of them are just on...

But you need to understand. Like, that's just the ones that are like

too like excited about it but like you just say 90% of people who say they like Trump are just like chill

just a chill guy Just a chill guy. Just a chill girl, whatever.

Usually the crazy ones are like people who are in liberal cultural environments and therefore have to defend themselves way too much.

I'm not talking about MAGA influencers.

99.9% of MAGA influencers, we're gonna throw them in a gulag in a video game if we ever sees power. I'm talking about regular ass people. I'm not talking about Twitter space

Maga people on Twitter spaces.

Those people say Lof.

That's all I'm saying.

So. Thank you. but if anything you should take away is just how important the political unconscious is

um

to understand politics

it's just so fucking fundamental and don't overthink it

just get it or don't get it

but don't overthink it

it's like you get it or you

maybe I'm cringe for even

thinking of it this way

but I'm just like shit

when a Bernie Sanders

person walks in the room with a Bernie shirt

there's not a lot of class struggle in the air

but when somebody walks in with a fucking MAGA hat

there's a lot of class divisions that that exposes to the surface

that's what I mean to say it's like the divisions that that exposes to the surface.

That's what I mean to say.

It's like the true class divisions just bubble up into the surface.

Yeah, not in ways that are that that convey like class consciousness but like the all of the real symptoms of the class division just start to come tum to the surface oh yeah you want free health care that's fine oh yeah

you want like uh more taxes whatever fine have all

these policies oh yeah i have the policies but don't wear that fucking maga hat and don't

fucking be politically incorrect and be vulgar and use the wrong language.

Don't you dare say the retard word.

Oh yeah, yeah, fine.

Yeah, yeah, that's fine.

Don't you dare say retard, though?

Because that's throwing a grenade into the

discursive

you know fortress of bourgeois

of

uh

bourgeois psychology

you're just fucking besieging

their psychology

you're besieging the integrity of their

their whole world view

John Stowe, what's up?

Yeah, yeah, yeah, you want...

Okay, even in it, you're in a room uh comolo supporters

lip tarts someone goes you know i think we should have communism someone goes i think we should have

communism and i'm also even i'm actually i'm a tankie and I want I I like Chairman Mal and Chairman

Gonzalo and we should throw everyone in the gulag and the the the the Liptard Kamala supporter has

wine and like oh you silly my co-worker's so silly.

But then

someone in that same room just goes

Yeah, Bob from next door is such a retard.

And that everyone

lose their mind. Because someone

said retard.

So, like, that's the type of shit I'm trying to talk about.

Like, that's what I'm saying.

Do you get it?

It doesn't matter what you say, like, consciously.

Like, there's something going on unconsciously that is the truth like that it's very very psychological it's extremely psychological

hit what's going on bro bro? Appreciate the five. It's extremely psychological.

Extremely psychological.

Oh yeah, my friend, she's a Maoist. She's so silly. She's my little Maoist revolutionary friend. We're all out at brunch, and here's my Maoist friend. So silly. And here's my Kamala friend

and here's my Raytheon

friend

and there's my other friend

who we just met

yeah

man bitches be retarded and shit I'm Yeah.

Man,

bitches be retarded and shit.

Oh what?

It's like you just threw it,

you just fucking detonated a bomb at brunch.

You just detonated a bomb.

Something happened.

What is that?

You know, think of it. What is that?

Like, can we be real about how that's a real thing?

Like, that's, and nobody knows how to explain it or nobody even acknowledges it.

Right?

Like something's going on there.

You know, Zijek talked about this.

He used to talk about it.

But it's real.

It's actually like a real thing. like it doesn't matter what you say consciously

it what really it's the unconscious registers that get tripped over when you maybe cross a line

you say the wrong thing and the true

the true content of your class

position your class outlook

just gets activated

hit what's going on bro

it's so

so viscerally psychological

even I can't fully explain it

I mean I could if I sat down and wrote about it

but

it's almost theological.

That's how much it's like in this

extremely difficult territory.

And what is it rooted in?

Well, here's the thing about you'll learn when you study semiotics and discourse and language itself.

Let me put it to you in these.

This is why it's

I need to find a way to simplify it

that's my difficulty

it's like on the one hand

you have

a shared

discursive horizon

and there can be a diverse content within that discursive horizon.

Like you can have this political position, you can have that position.

And then underlying that shared discursive horizon is a specific logic of how language itself emerges from reality, from the real, right?

And the real, right? And the real conflicts and disputes, and let's say the real discourse itself is happening at that level of the different ways in which we relate language to reality at its most fundamental.

And I think that's where, you know, people say, oh, Heidegger, Haas is, well, yeah, I mean mean Heidegger is the one who opened up

A lot of this

Type way of this way of thinking about

You know

Understanding this kind of

Way in which language is related to the world and reality.

I mean, he started it.

By no means, he finished it.

You know.

But, yeah, I mean, there are... when we have these kind of

I think true

class

sentiment

or whatever we want to, temperament, whatever we want to call it, is not happening at the level of something within language.

It's happening at the level of how language is related to reality and a world itself.

And that is the real...

You know, Dugan recently has been posting some stuff,

which stupid people don't understand.

But it's clear to me,

because I'm not one of those stupid people.

Ha-ha.

Because Dugan, he says, you know, there's a new race of liberals and they are racist against everyone.

There's the liberal race and they're racist to all other civilizations and also non-liberals. Why is Dugan saying

that liberals are becoming like a new race, regardless of skin color, regardless of whatever?

Well, because what we understand as race has a lot to do with language.

It has a lot to do with our fundamental horizon of existence, how we, um, how we dwell, not only how we dwell within language,

but how our language dwells within and from reality, how it's made from that.

And in the case of political correctness, what is so violent, and yeah, it's violence, when you think about what violence actually means, it is a kind of violence, when you just say retard without any regard for political correctness, what is so violent about that? Because within the bourgeois liberal world, I have come up with elaborate rational justifications for why the word retard is harmful and wrong

and it should not be used

because it is offensive

and insensitive

whatever right and it perpetuate

a leftist spin it perpetuates ablyism

or something okay well when most people use the word

retard they're just not thinking at that level they're not thinking in terms of i am going to use

language according to what i think reality should be reflected as. I'm just trying to

communicate like what I really think is going on or how I really feel or where my mind really is at.

Not necessarily...

So it's not about morality.

It's in the sense of like, it's not about me creating a double world where it's where you know the moral self-consciousness reigns supreme because that's a fake world that doesn't even exist it's not the real world that's a world you maybe want to exist, but it just doesn't. And for the liberal

or the leftist liberal, the reason that world can't exist is because we are not, nobody else

wants to participate in it.

But if we all just did the right thing and used the right language, we'd be living in that world.

And so for them, the way in which language is related to reality is that it has um it has like a authority in the in a sense it has a ability to shape reality according to the whims and fancies of moral self-consciousness

and what kind of position in the real world does that reflect? Well, it reflects a class of people whose material

existence depends upon reflecting the world and creating worlds, whether that's artists or it's, um, it's, uh, you know,

Hollywood writers, it's cultural workers, whatever. And when those people are institutionalized, those institutions carry with them traditions.

And those traditions reflect a specific outlook.

And it just changes the nature of language.

And why has this become a division at the level of society?

How is this polarized our society itself in two?

Well, it's because this country is becoming institutionalized at such a level that how reality is being reflected is itself becoming part of reality, like

Baudelaard, whatever, would say, right?

But the institutions of civil society are beginning to permeate every aspect of reality

as a consequence of the fourth industrial revolution and as a consequence of social media

everything is becoming hyper-reflexive.

It's becoming a copy without an original, you know, a reflection without an original, whatever Bodreelard or whatever talked about.

So this leaves us

a great deal of anxiety with respect

to the real. What is reality?

And for those of us in the thick of it,

you know, there's no way to have any certainty about that. There's no way to have any certainty about that there's no way to trust any any um any simulation of reality, right?

But if you're a salaried Netflix employee, there is.

It comes from the assurances and, you know, safety that comes with your institution, your social network, your community. but i think what maga reflects is that america's that is a layer on top of the real community of language upon which America rests.

And the real community of language upon which the country rests is the reality of material reality, of material economic existence, which we cannot

represent directly, but which nonetheless has the quality

of this kind of

overcoating, if you want,

right? It's like

the real, real reality

is not the one that we can choose to create.

It's one that is definitely real.

Definitely there, but...

But... Definitely there, but there's no way to directly represent it. It just exerts itself in the form of symptoms, and it can only be denoted in seemingly irrational ways like maga itself Thank you. and I think the liberal outlook, which is an extension of the Anglo-Saxon metaphysical outlook, is that that reality cannot have content.

They may acknowledge it, but for them, it's this purely hostile and malign real, which

they identify with Nazism.

Let's be clear.

They identify it with all the worst aspects of bad

human nature and Hobbesian

chaos and

everything dark and evil

and it's all Nazis and swastikas

and it's criminal and it's bad.

So we need to have

this fake simulated world or else we're thrown into the wilderness of that. But what they lack is what Marx had, which is a sense of faith in the real, that in that wilderness lies the concrete whole of our existence.

And we should not be afraid of that.

We should understand that in that alone lies our salvation, if there is any.

In that alone lies the content of our morality, for better or for worse.

And for Marx, that was the proletariat, which Marx wasn't a philanthropist who believed the proletariat

needed to be rescued. He believed that it contained the key to the emancipation of all of mankind by virtue of its

existence in the real, not by virtue of some empathetic and compassionate philanthropist who is going to save the proletariat,

but that real existence that Marx identified as the proletariat contain the key to mankind's existence, to our humanity.

Everything we consider moral, everything we consider good, everything we consider real and human and in common our language everything all of that was bounded up with this class for marks all of human history all of history itself.

Dunes, what's up?

And for Marx, that was a risk to take that step, but he did.

And that's what Marxism was.

And Fabian socialism was the opposite. Fabian socialism,

which is where all these people are coming from, said, ah, this is horrible. Oh, it's so horrible, the proletariat. We need to fix it by having, you know, remedies.

And we're going to fix it.

And we're going to alleviate the problem.

And then everyone's going to be living in the yogurt commercial where it's all solar punk.

But that wasn't Marx's position.

It just wasn't.

It really wasn't.

Marx had faith in humanity's real existence, not an imagined existence, the real one.

And he thought it heralded a world historical transformation.

And that we just need to have the courage to have faith. Yeah, and I'm going to say faith. Because what else? Marks would say we need to have the courage to know, to dare to know.

So it's a scientific outlook.

But to have the courage to know

is a form of faith.

To know what is said cannot be known is a form of faith.

To know the unknowable

he's a form of faith

and he gave it the authority of knowledge

that's why marks

you know was not

uh some you know, was not some religious mystic

he had the brow of Socrates

and it was the authority of knowledge

that he gave to the proletariat. but um...

But um... That is an acquiescence to the real, at the least.

That is a Promethean gesture of knowledge that's here in the realm of the conceit of self-consciousness and the imagined and the ideal and you go down you go down to reality, like Prometheus.

And you bring that knowledge down.

You bring it...

You bring it down.

And what does that actually mean? People't get it it's not come down from your university

and be politically correct and teach people how to be politically correct no you go down in the

sense that you accept that concrete material reality, that's what's real.

That's the realm of existence.

Not that bullshit in your universe. That's the real world that can be known that a new

relationship of praxis but that is it that's it whether it's good whether it's bad whether it's

whether it's beautiful it doesn matter, that's what it is.

And that's what it means to come down and bring the fire of Prometheus down. Give that

accursed and forsaken reality of mankind, the oppressed and the exploited of mankind, the authority, the courage and the dignity of knowledge.

And that's what it is that's what it is

that's what it is

in any case guys

this wasn't supposed to go so long

but uh

it caught me thinking a little bit.

Anyway, guys, I think I'll see you.

I don't know when I'll see you.

Maybe Friday or Sunday.

Anyway, guys, happy Thanksgiving.

Hope you have a good one.

And I'll see you around.

See you all later.