🔴 RED NEWS | DEBATING LEFTIST! | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES

When they put mirror tin on the tent, I wanna see the reflex.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

Wherever her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drink to a flex.

They stick at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Trinity lips like my pets.

I lick the bitch, you mean for sex.

I know that young one of the catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the chip.

One-on-one bitch, it they ten.

One-on-one, never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme on the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it though.

One-on-one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes, and all of them cost me a grip.

Come to the U.S., so pretty ho.

Ready to go in the pro with her looks.

Good.

Surface, I'm ready to tip.

You knowin' I'm here, I don't gotta chip.

You know I ain't a little bit of shrimp.

We switching positions, we switching locations.

I'm freaking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

Bout to start calling me him.

Honey, you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Push some boot, HP on the tie.

I with the one-on-one ride.

I come from the bit of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bitch like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Bitch, they ten, one on one, never again.

I'm gonna get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' on this bitch, and I'm ugly.

I'm having a snowboard, pull up her legs.

Part of my dummy, y'all see how I come, you don't tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Guinness is young, and I've been hitting shoot about some money all under my bed.

2018 came with me, and I had a career, nigga, thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little itch.

Hit on one time, told her, pull up again, making it look put stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I went to cook maritin on the tent.

I wanna see the reflex.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

You wear her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drink to a flex.

Just look at the chip, I poke out my chest.

She niggas lil bull at my pets.

I lift the visual for sex.

I know that young one of the kitchen.

Got one-on-one ice on the jet.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it though.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes.

And I love them, cost me a crip.

Going to the U.S.

So pretty hoe, ready to go in the pro with her looks.

Good, service, I'm ready to tip.

You knowin' I'm here, I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't no lip bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switchin' locations.

I'm fuckin' this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say gunna no more.

She bout to start calling me him.

Better start calling me him.

What need you making it hot?

Your stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Horse and boo, HB on the tie.

Up with the one-on-one ride.

I come from the bit of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these be like surprise.

One-on-one, bitch, you day 10.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

Give me some hit in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put maritin on the tent, I wanna see the reflex.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

You wear her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drink to a flex.

They stick at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Treating lil bull like my pets.

I lift the visual hoop for sex.

I know that you don't wanna catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the chick.

One-on-one bitchy, they ten.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hit.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it, though.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes, and all of them cost me a grip.

Come to the U.S., I'm pretty ho ready.

They goin' to pro with her lips.

Service, I'm ready to tip.

You knowin' I'm here, I don't gotta chip.

You know I ain't no lip bit of shrimp.

We switchin' positions, we switchin' locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say gonna no more.

She bout to start calling me him.

About to start calling me him.

I need you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Course and boo, HB on the tie.

I put the one-on-one ride.

Cup in the bill of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Pop out on these bit like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Bitch, they ten, one on one, never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hit.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' this bitch in the urgency on having a snowboard, pull up a leg.

Part of my dummy, y'all see how I come, don't tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Guess this young and I've been hitting shoot about some money all under my bed.

2018 came with me and I made a career, niggas thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little itch.

Get on one time, told her, pull up again, making it look put stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I went and cooked maritin on the tent.

I wanna see the reflection on the bitch just at the mat.

You rub it her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drip to a flex.

They stick at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Treatin' lil bullet at my pets.

I lift the bitch, you for sex.

I know that young one of the kitchen.

Got one-on-one ice on the chip.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it though.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes and I love one cost me a crip.

Going to the U.S., I'm pretty hope.

Ready, they go in the pole with her looks.

Good.

Surface, I'm ready to tip.

You know, I'm here.

I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't no lip bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say gun or no more.

She bout to start calling me him.

About to start calling me him.

I need you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Course and boo, HB on the tie.

I'm with the one-on-one ride.

Cup in the bitter slide.

I come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bitch like surprise.

One-on-one, bitch, you they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coupon.

The motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

One bitch, they ten, one on one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hitch.

Ain't all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' this bitch in the urgent, having the snowboarding, pull up her legs.

Part of my dummy, y'all see how I'm coming, yo.

Tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Guinness is young, and I've been hitting.

She brought some money all under my bed.

2018 came a meeting.

I made a career, nigga, thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little dick.

Get a one time told her, pull up again.

Making it look put stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put mirror tint on the tent.

I wanna see the reflex.

From the bitch just at the mat.

Do whatever her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drip to a flex.

They stick at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Trinity look at my pets.

I lift the visual hoop for sex.

I know the young one of the catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the jet.

One-on-one bitch, it they ten.

One-on-one never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk.

You can hitch.

Ain't all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it, though.

One-on-one missing it in.

One-on-one mess with me kick.

One one on one on one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes and all of them cost me a grip.

Come to the U.S., I'm pretty hooked ready.

They go in the pole with her lips.

Good service, I'm ready to tip.

You know I'm here, I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't a little bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

I need you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Course some boo, HB on the tie.

Up with the one-on-one ride.

I'm comforting the bit of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bit like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they ten.

One-on-one never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W do for a win.

Bitch, they turn one on one never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupe in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feeling all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fucking this bitch in the verge, I'm having a snowboard, pull up her legs.

Five for my dummy, y'all see how I come and take me up right on the edge.

Games is young and I've been hitting shootouts some money all under my bed.

2018 came with me and I made a career, niggas thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little itch.

Hit her one time, told her, pull up again, making it look put stretch.

Give me some hit in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put maritin on the tent, I wanna see the reflection.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

You rub it her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drill to a flex.

Just look at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Don't treat it lil bull at my pets.

I lift the bitch, you for sex.

I know that young on her catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the chip.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupe in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it though.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes.

And I'm living cost me a crip.

Going to the U.S., I'm pretty hopeful ready.

They go in the pro with her lips.

Service, I'm ready to tip.

You know when I'm here, I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't no lip bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say gun no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

About to start calling me him.

What need you making it hot?

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Course and boo, HB on the tie.

Up with the 101 ride.

They come from the bit of the slide.

I come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bit like surprise.

One on one, bitch, you they tend.

One on one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme in the town and the drop-top coupe in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One bitch at the team, one on one, never again.

I'm gonna get the kick in the butter.

I counted like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hitch.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' this bitch in the urgent, having the snowbunny pull up a leg.

Buffalo my dummy, y'all see how I'm coming, yo.

Tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Guinness is young, and I've been hitting.

She brought some money all under my bed.

2018 came a meeting, I made it career niggas, thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little itch.

Little one time told her, pull up again, making it look put stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put maritin on the tent, I wanna see the reflection.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

You wear her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drink to a flex.

Just look at the chick, I poke out my chest.

I'm treating a little bull at my pets.

I lift the bitch, you for sex.

I know the young one of her catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the jet.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

When get the cake in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hit.

Ain't all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it, though.

One-on-one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes, and I love them cost me a grip.

Come to the US, I'm pretty hooked.

Ready to go in the pole with her lips.

Service, I'm ready to tip.

You know I'm here, I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't a little bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

Bout to start calling me him.

Honey, you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Push some boo, HP on the tie.

I put the one-on-one ride.

They come from the bell at a slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on this bit like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the cake in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One bitch, they ten, one on one, never again.

I'm gonna get the kick in the butter.

I counted like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hitch.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' this bitch in the org, I'm having a snowball, they pull up a leg.

Far from a dummy, y'all see how I'm coming, don't tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Genus is young, and I've been hitting.

She brought some money all under my bed.

2018 come a meeting, I made a career nigga, thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little dick.

Get a one time told her, pull up again, making it look stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put maritin on the tent.

I wanna see the reflex.

From the bitch dressed at the mat, do whatever her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drink to a flex.

They stick at the chick, I poke out my chest.

Trinity look at my picks.

I lift the visual for sex.

I know that young one of her catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the jet.

One-on-one bitch, it they ten.

One-on-one never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme ran a ton in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hitch.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W do for a win.

One on one missing it up.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one on one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes, and all of them cost me a grip.

Come to the U.S.

So pretty hope ready to go in the pole with her lips.

Good, service, I'm ready to tip.

You knowin' I'm here, I don't gotta chip.

You know I ain't a little bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

Bout to start calling me him.

I'm him.

I need you making it hot.

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Point some boo, HB on the tie.

Up with the 101 ride.

I'm comforting the bit of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on the bit like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they ten.

One-on-one never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W do for a win.

Bitch, they ten, one on one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupon, I'm more than a trunk, you can hit.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fuckin' this bitch in the urgent, I'm having this.

Nobody pull up her legs.

Far from a dummy, you'll see how I come, don't take me.

I'm right on the edge.

Guinness is young, and I've been hitting.

She bought some money all under my bed.

2018 came with me, and I got a career, niggas thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little ex.

The one time I told her, pull up again, making it look put stretch.

Give me some hit in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I went and put maritin on the tent.

I wanna see the reflection.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

Do what it her dress, I know how to dress.

She turned the drill to a flex.

Just look at the chip, I poke out my chest.

She nigga lil bull at my pets.

I lit the bitch, you for sex.

I know the young one of the kitchen.

Got one on one ice on the chip.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm more than a trunk, you can hit.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it though.

One on one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes and I'm left on cost me a cup.

Going to the U.S., I'm pretty hopeful ready.

They go in the pole with her looks.

Good.

Surface, I'm ready to tip.

You know, I'm here.

I don't got a chip.

You know I ain't no liberty shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

She bout to start calling me him.

Why need you making it hot?

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Pour some boot, HB on the tie.

Up with the 101 ride.

Cup in the bitter slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bit like surprise.

One on one, bitch, you they tend.

One on one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I counted like hustle the money all in.

Rhyming the town in the drop-top coupon.

The motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Ain't all about how they want me to lose, but I'm W, do for a win.

One bitch at the 10.

101, never again.

I'm gonna get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hear it.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Fucking this bitch in the pose, you don't have to snowboard me, pull up a leg.

Buff on a dummy, y'all see how I'm coming, don't tip me, I'm right on the edge.

Gimme since young and I've been hitting shootout some money all under my bed.

2018 came with me and I made it correct, thought it be dead.

I get cold, my body cold.

I took a little dick.

Little one time told her, pull up again, making it look pretty stretch.

Give me some head in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put mirror tint on the tent.

I wanna see the reflex.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

You wear her dress, I know how to dress.

Turn the drip to a flex.

Just look at the chick, I poke out my chest.

I'm trending look at my pets.

I lick the visual for sex.

I know that young one of the catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the jet.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear it.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One on one missing it up.

One-on-one missing it in.

One-on-one makes me kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one passes and all of them cost me a grip.

Come to the U.S.

So pretty hope ready.

They go in the pro with her lips.

Good surface, I'm ready to tip.

You knowin' I'm here, I don't gotta chip.

You know I ain't a little bit of shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say guna no more.

And she bout to start calling me him.

Bout to start calling me him.

Why need you making it hot?

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Course some boo, HP on the tie.

I with the one-on-one ride.

They come from the bit of the slide.

Come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on these bitch like surprise.

One-on-one bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

When get the kick in the butter, I count it like hustle, the money all in.

Rhyme in the town in the drop-top coupon.

I'm motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W do for a win.

Give me some hit in the back of the band, ripping the back of her neck.

I wanna put maritin on the tent, I wanna see the reflex.

I'm the bitch dressed at the mat.

The webinar dress, I know how to dress.

She turned the juice to a flex.

They stick at the chip, I poke out my chest.

Training look like my pets.

I lift the visual hoop for sex.

I know that you don't wanna catch.

Got one-on-one ice on the chip.

One-on-one bitch attend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop and the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feel all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

One-on-one missing it, though.

One-on-one missing it in.

One-on-one messing with kick.

One one on one-on-one, bitch.

Come to the spot, I got one-on-one pops and all of them cost me a grip.

Flun to the U.S., so pretty ho ready.

They go in the pole with her lips.

Good.

Service, I'm ready to tip.

You know when I'm here, I don't got a chip.

You know, I ain't no lipity shrimp.

We switching position, we switching locations.

I'm fucking this bitch in the gym.

She said she don't wanna say gonna no more.

She bout to start calling me him.

Bout to start calling me him.

Who need you making it hot?

The stakes is high, the prices is high.

I'm about to fly to Dubai.

Crossing boot, HB on the tie.

Up with the one-on-one ride.

Cuffin' the bit of the slash.

I come and I come to get mine.

Hop out on the beat like surprise.

101, bitch, it they tend.

One-on-one, never again.

Don't get the kick in the butter.

I count it like hustle the money all in.

Rhyme round the town in the drop-top coop in the motor in the trunk, you can hear.

Feeling all about how they want me to loot, but I'm W, do for a win.

Alright, I've been making a lot of mistakes.

Um

Yeah.

Let's just uh let's go ahead.

Welcome to the stream, everyone.

I hope there's no buffering.

I hope there's no buffering and um

Wow, I need a haircut.

I uh gotten too long.

Hair's gotten way too long, way too long.

But guys, um

It's late.

It's late because you guys didn't do the thing I asked you to, which is boost it to one K.

So boost it to one K overnight.

That's your mission.

You're not allowed to go to sleep.

You have to spend all night boosting it.

Uh still boosted.

But guys, I have another thing to tell you.

I um

I have another thing to tell you.

I have an essay I want to release.

You know, it's not really an essay, actually.

I want to.

So, people ask me why don't I do articles?

Why don't I write articles?

Why don't I do short pieces like an academic or whatever?

And the reason is because no one reads.

Because I'm not going to reach an audience doing that.

No one reads.

Nobody reads articles.

Nobody reads sub stacks, even.

Nobody reads.

Unfortunately, right?

Nobody reads.

My sub stacks, you know, they're the size of short books, so nobody reads.

So I started doing this thing.

This is actually this is related to the James Lindsey thing.

I'm not gonna really dwell on that too much.

But I decided that on X in particular, when they have the longer tweet thing,

This is an opportunity to actually get people reading for idiots.

So.

There's yeah, I'm gonna talk about the book in a second 'cause it's related.

But basically, I don't do articles.

I do tweets and it sounds ridiculous, but it's like what the fuck is the difference?

You know, a tweet is longer.

Sorry, a tweet can be just as long as an article.

For example, the one I'm gonna release tomorrow is about 2500 words, which is in the same territory as an actual article, right?

But in any case, um

I think you guys are really underestimating the the tweet things I put I put out, the essays, the ones that are long, especially when I make a uh a a picture for it, a cover title picture or whatever.

You guys should take those, compile them and like make a book out of it or some shit.

I don't know.

It was a short, short little pamphlet, I guess, not a book.

But I have a lot of bangers.

I have a lot of bangers, and I don't ever see you guys talking about them.

It's kind of a shame.

I want to tell you guys what what what my um angle is with those posts, because I actually feel like I'm pioneering a new genre of literature.

I'm such a genius, aren't I?

Anyway, I'm just kidding, but I do think it is kind of a new genre and I want to talk about that.

The genre, I think, is a combination of.

So there's always this input-output problem with Marxism.

It's like you have the theory, which who gives a shit if anyone can understand it?

It's truth.

It's truth itself, right?

So you have the theory, and this is like Marx's early writings.

This is Marx before he writes Capital, more or less.

And then you have agitation, which is a form of propaganda, right?

Which is you're writing this not so much to just give expression purely to the truth and that's it, but to also communicate effectively a message to people.

So it's this agitation-education distinction.

Remember the three things of the three phrases of social democracy when it was revolutionary used to be organization, education, and agitation, right?

Am I right about that?

Maybe I I got one of those wrong.

But i the yeah, theory and uh education and agitation are not the same thing, but you can collapse them into the same thing.

And that's what I like to do with my tweets.

I don't it it's it first of all, I condense them

And I and I know people have short attention spans, because this is how I am on Twitter.

Like, for example, Logo is a genius.

He's literally a genius.

Like, straight up.

He's actually a genius.

And if we ever come to power, we're building a giant statue of him.

But literally, the only critique I have of Logo, it's not even a critique.

Every time I read his long tweets, they're not broken up, so it's like one long wall of text, and I'm like dyslexic or something.

I don't know, like, and I it's hard for me to follow.

That, but it's all, but that's why it's painful to me because if you read it, it's brilliant.

It's always brilliance, you know?

It's just hard for me to read because of that.

But I should get better.

I'm not saying Logo should change his style.

I'm just saying, like, I'm obviously communicating to a different, more stupid audience than he is.

But in any case,.

Um

In any case, I like to have only a sentence.

I don't do paragraphs.

Paragraphs, people have lost the attention span to read paragraphs.

But, you know, the brilliant thing about Twitter, and I feel like I've hacked into this a little bit, is that on Twitter, people have gotten used to scrolling and reading several sentences in succession, right?

So I could kind of exploit that and have people coming along and reading these long tweets, which actually do pretty successful on the algorithm.

Sometimes they don't, but a lot of times they actually do.

And you know, I'll make sure that there's always breaks so that people, you know, they can just think about the sentence.

And, you know, that's a style I like to sharpen more and more.

And I've been working on it for a very long time.

And actually, the person who introduced me to this was Nick Land.

Nick Land, he said something about how long books are stupid.

And that has kind of taught me to be short and snappy when it comes to anything I share on the internet in terms of writings.

I try to be.

For my sub stacks, I obviously take a lot of liberty.

But Twitter, because of the longer tweets, it's allowed me to practice being short and snappy.

I actually think a lot of people underestimate the Marxism is not woke because it has such a stupid title that's meant for stupid people.

People underestimate it, but it was actually a really tremendous feat for me to condense so much in tweets.

I made sure that each part of the thread did not exceed the maximum limit for the tweets, right?

And that was a really painful exercise in discipline for me.

Like, how do I condense something really complicated?

And really, there's a lot of references, whatever, but just make it really simple, right?

So, that's something I've been practicing for a long time.

I think I've been getting better at it because the po the posts are doing better algorithmically.

More people are reading them and they seem to understand them.

But I want you guys to understand, do not underestimate

The amount that is being condensed.

I know that they are very simplistic and they're they're condensed, obviously.

They're extremely simplistic, like for a five-year-old.

But I make them simplistic because I I want, you know, an average person who's mildly educated in politics to understand them.

But there's a lot behind it, you know.

There's a lot of logic that goes into it, there's a lot of um.

knowledge that goes into it, you know, and if you know, you know, you can catch the references.

Like but anyway, um, the references are not direct, but like you can you can tell who I'm influenced by and who I read and where I'm getting this from if you actually read carefully.

But you know, my I want to talk about something else.

Now, as much as I like doing that on X, and I've been doing it over the course of a year.

As much as I like doing that on X instead of writing articles, because I think articles are obsolete in my personal opinion.

I could be very wrong about that, but I just get the feeling people don't read anymore.

I feel like X is the last thing people read now.

And beyond that, it's TikTok.

And that's where Eddie takes over, because I will never be good at TikTok, right?

Now, YouTube content.

Long form video essays, this is something we used to do, but it's just so much effort.

It takes so much effort.

Because it's almost like my tweets, but you have to put it into a script.

You have to record your voice.

You can't have too many cuts, and you have to have videos to edit.

And it's just like that, that would, you could, look, I'm going to just tell you guys something.

My tweets are open source.

If you ever wanted to make video essays based on them,

Do it and they'll probably be successful if you actually understand them.

Just credit me, not s just so you're not being a dick, you know?

But here's the thing.

Now, as much as I'm saying this for X, and as much as I'm saying this because about writing and where's Haas's major writings, the upcoming book is going to be quite long.

I think it's going to be at least 600 pages.

Could be wrong about that.

But it's going to be quite long.

And it's not going to be easy to read.

And it's going to be quite dense.

It's going to be quite dense.

Okay.

The portion that is new writings that I'm contributing to it is very dense.

It's not easy to read.

And it's like the opposite of my tweets.

So that is where you're going to get more of the serious Amela with the 10.

Let's go.

That's where you're going to get the more serious kind of just pure theory, not agitational material.

But I did something that I think was a good decision.

So, mm I don't know, don't quote me on this.

I think twenty to thirty percent of the book are actually just transcribed stream lectures.

Don't quote me on that number, but I think it's 20 to 30 percent.

20 to 30 percent of the book are transcribed stream lectures that I did.

That are in between chapters.

And why did I decide to do that?

Well, actually, initially, the book was just supposed to be transcriptions from the like three, four-hour long stream lectures I did in the past.

Farabi, what's up, right?

And then, uh, Hassan, by the way, Hassan is the one, uh, Hassan Ali, he's the one who's been helping me with all of it.

He's the one who's putting it all together, he's the editor.

And then you know what?

Hassan just said, Okay, now write the introduction, and then it was supposed to be done, right?

And this was like a year ago minimum.

This was like a year and a half ago.

So I wrote the introduction and then the introduction kept getting longer.

And it got really long.

And then it got really long.

And then I told him, I'm like, look, man, I don't want to do an introduction anymore.

I actually want to just write the book.

Most of the book, I'm just going to write it.

And actually the stream lectures will be in the like the minority of it.

But the stream lectures are very rel they're here's what the the point of transcribing the stream lectures the stream lectures have humor in them They're much easier to understand and they're gonna really contextualize the content of the book so that you're gonna read a chapter that you don't understand right then the next chapter is gonna be the stream lecture which you probably will understand there's so much references to movies and TV shows and all this kind of stuff in it and it's very relatable it's very digestible and then I feel like that's gonna make you better understand the chapter you didn't understand when you go back and read it right

So this is how I'm helping you digest the book.

It's really just to help.

It's like I'm giving you food you cannot digest.

So, you know, wash it down with the stream lectures transcribed.

Then at the end of it, there's going to be a chapter that was a short mini book I did not finish from years ago.

Um which isn't finished, but it's mainly finished, I guess.

So that's why it's going to be so long.

But it could be long it could be eight hundred, nine hundred pages, I don't know.

I have not worked on it in a while.

By a while I mean like three, four months, because I'm focussed on the manifesto.

Now the problem with the manifesto is not the length, it's that I'm having people give me a lot of sources because, um,

There's a lot of

Fact stuff and history stuff that I have to get into in it, and I have to be very precise about all that, right?

Will the book title be?

You're you'll see.

I think you guys will be very excited when you see the cover, it's super cool.

Uh

It's actually so cool.

Like, you guys are going to understand the vibe I've been on once it's released.

You're going to understand the vibe I've been on for a while.

Super excited for it.

It's really all I care about is getting this book out.

And, you know, I'm ex I'm.

I'm definitely looking forward to it.

I'll give you a hint about like the vibe.

The vibe is not futurism for this book, although I am going to have a book that's about the mecha tanky stuff.

There's going to be, I'm getting way ahead of myself with all these promises I'm making you.

Once this book is finished, I'm going to embark on a mecha tanky book, which is going to be about political economy, technology, and Landian acceleration and things like that.

And it's going to focus on things of that nature.

I'm gonna r go back to the mecha tanky thing.

Um and talk about that.

It's gonna be super cool.

But this one is going to be the opposite of that.

So this one is very barbaric.

This is my barbaric book.

My my ancient barbaric book, okay?

Uh there's a Twitter user.

I'm gonna just fucking say this right now.

I don't have a problem with this guy, but there's a Twitter user whose name is Bronze Age Communist.

Um, I just want to put this on record.

You better clip this and make a record of it.

That's the vibe I've been on for like a year and a half.

All right.

So I don't want this guy.

I don't know him.

I don't think he'll do it, but I'm just saying, just in case.

I don't want my book to come out and this guy, oh, he took my whole thing.

I invented.

No, that's the shit I was on.

All right.

I just want to be clear.

I haven't read what he's saying.

I just saw the name Bronze Age Communist.

I was like,

Alright, well, I gotta copyright that shit.

It's not the title at all, but I'm saying like the vibe, you know?

And the focus, literally.

So, these are some updates I wanted to give you on the theory, I guess, side of things.

But I'm very reluctant to write articles.

I'm very reluctant.

Why would I write an article when I can just do an interview?

You know, I could just talk.

Actually, that's what Michael Hudson does.

Michael Hudson doesn't even write anymore.

He just writes books and then he gives interviews, and that's how he communicates.

And that's the vibe I'm on.

Personally, that's just a personal preference thing.

No shame in writing articles and stuff.

It's just I can't do it.

You know, I've lost the patience.

And why have I lost the patience?

Because people just take you out of context and they'll just try to, you know, they'll try to.

put words in your mouth and make it appear that you're s writing something you don't mean to say and so on.

And yeah, they'll do that in live streams as well, obviously.

But I I just consider consider the medium of text a little bit more sacred that I and I care more about it.

So, this is something I wanted to talk about.

And the post, I actually want you guys to read this, and I want you to understand: this is not pure theory, this is not pure education, it's not pure agitation.

It's a combination of all of these things.

And when I'm writing these essays,

What's up, Taggies?

When I'm writing these essays, I would like you guys to understand that this is a vibe I'm trying to communicate to you.

It's like a style and it's a talking point.

Talking points and it's like a rhetorical foundation I'm trying to communicate for you so you can use it as well.

So my upcoming post is going to be it's finished.

It's totally finished by the way.

I just have to release it at the right time.

And I spent all day today writing it.

It's going to be about the history of socialism, the word socialism versus communism.

Because there was some idiot.

Can't wait to see insert smiley face.

Jennifer, wow.

Oh my God, thank you so much.

Wow, Jennifer Oh my God Jennifer, thank you so much.

Thank you so, so much.

I am actually speechless.

Off

Wow, Jennifer, if you guys don't know Jennifer, Jennifer is literally probably the oldest gorilla.

There is.

Jennifer was.

Jennifer has to be in the FBI, first of all, all right?

Because the, the, I think it was like the day or the second day that I clicked the live button on YouTube.

Jennifer was in the chat on day one when I had two viewers.

One of them was Jennifer.

All right.

She is actually the oldest member of our community.

I could be wrong about that.

But I'm pretty confident she is the oldest member of our community.

Like literally the oldest.

I'm just kidding.

She's not an FBI agent.

But even if she was, it's okay.

I forgive her.

She's great.

If she's an FBI agent, all she's doing is monitoring us, and I'm fine with that, because we're not doing anything wrong.

Um

No, she's not an FBI agent.

She's actually legit.

But I'm just it's crazy though that you guys don't a lot of you guys don't know that, you know?

But, Jennifer, thank you so much.

I'm so happy to see that you're still with it, still an OG.

You know, it makes me very proud because, you know, there's been just so many ups and downs.

There's been since I hit that live button, just so many ups and downs, you know.

And a lot of twists and lot of turns and a lot of things, you know, a lot of people that liked me started hating me, a lot of people that hated me started liking me.

But, you know, Jennifer stayed the same, stayed loyal, you know.

And, um, makes me super happy, you know?

But again, thank you so much for that.

I really appreciate it.

Um, you know, I'm not gonna let you guys down.

You guys have to understand the trouble.

The trouble I put myself in.

You know?

In my life, you know.

Women, this, and why aren't you paying attention?

You guys are the ones I'm answerable to and loyal to, you know?

You have no idea how much

You know.

I'm always fighting for you guys no matter where I am.

I could be on the other side of the world, I'm in Russia, I fight for you.

And the Russians know that they're, I'm not loyal.

That I mean, they don't own me, you know.

I answer to my army, you know.

I answer to my army.

I don't answer to anyone else.

I'm loyal to you guys.

You know

And if if it wasn't for y'all, why would I be here?

Why would I be here?

You know?

Yeah, the Vosh days.

Why would I be here if it wasn't for y'all?

You know, that's really.

You guys need to understand, I'm not doing this.

Every time I feel like, oh, should I quit or whatever, I'm like, I'm not gonna let my gorillas down over my fucking dead body, you know?

And um

So that's how it is, you know.

That's how it is.

And you guys need to understand something.

This is something I'm also going to talk about a little, is like.

So, if you don't know, you may not care, but whatever.

I'll just tell you anyway.

James Lindsay, he's a massive pussy.

He's a huge pussy, but

He, um, today he tweeted, like, he quote-tweeted my tweet from behind a block, my Marxism is not woke tweet.

And he was like, oh.

This idiot doesn't even know that communism is dead.

It's o his religion is obsolete and I'm like

I'm like, your whole brand is like fear-mongering about communism.

Your whole brand is saying that, like, America is about to turn communist, and communists are, like, it's the number one threat to the West.

And it's like, oh, the number one enemy is communism.

Communists are here.

It's like, but, but, communism is also obsolete.

I mean, like, it's kind of fucking retarded, right?

But I see why he blocked me because he, you know, had I replied with that, he probably would have felt embarrassed.

So I made a tweet about it.

And then lo and behold, the guy replies to the tweet from behind a block, uh, calling me retarded.

So and then he sends Phil Labonte or whatever, a guy who refu you know, I went to Tim Pool's uh studio.

Tim Pool was pretty cool, he was very respectful, accommodating, he was a generous host.

Um, you know, political differences aside, I have no personal beef with Tim Pool.

Tim Pool did not really do anything that I, to me, that I consider dishonorable, right?

He did join in the debate, kind of on the side a little of uh Trevor Louden, but that's his right, it's his podcast.

I'm the guest there, right?

But even Tim Pool told me after that, he's like, Yo, Haas, like, I don't know why Phil doesn't want to debate you.

Like, I don't know why he won't.

Like, I don't get it.

Like, I don't know why he didn't want to come.

They snaked me with the clips.

Yeah, whatever though.

I mean, you when you think about it.

Yeah.

Um

It's their show.

They can do whatever they want with it.

But

Yeah.

So so Phil responded to my tweet though and he's like, Oh, James Lindy Lindsay wanted me to s show you this because I can't see his reply 'cause he blocked me so he's replying to me from behind a block so I can't respond.

So he sent Phil to show it to me or something.

I guess that was easier for him to do than to just unblock me.

But then I'm like, okay, so you're sending another guy who's running from debating me?

And then, you know, I kinda just.

I kinda just like am sick of it in the sense of like

I'm sick of not getting the proper recognition in terms of like how fucking crazy it is, how feared I am.

Everyone knows who I am.

Like they all know who I am.

Don't think for a second people don't know me.

All right.

Putin probably fucking knows who I am.

That's probably an exaggeration, but it's like everyone knows who I am.

I promise you that much.

Everyone, literally everyone in the space knows who I am.

I don't get a lot of viewers on my live streams.

You know, I barely ever break 1K.

My YouTube is only 30,000 subscribers.

My videos average like, I don't know, 15, 20k views, I guess.

I don't know, 10 to 20.

So, like, and I guess on Twitter, I'm, you know, 100K followers, which is decent.

But it's like, I'm not viral.

I'm not very viral.

Compared to the amount of people who are scared of me, compared to the fear that I project, it's like way more than the reach I have and the recognition I have.

And that's what's a little bit frustrating.

Now, I don't mind being feared.

I don't mind being feared.

As a matter of fact, I would rather be feared than loved any day.

Okay?

So, I don't mind being feared.

What I do have a problem with is the disparity between how much I

project fear in others, how much I strike fear and terror in their hearts,

And

The extent to which, like, I'm recognized for why that is.

Like, why are they so scared of me?

People should know why I'm so feared, and that's what I don't like.

They don't, they don't give me the recognition I deserve in terms of why I strike fear in them.

And then, I think about this a lot, and it's like, why wouldn't they fucking fear me?

Um, I am exactly what I appear as, you know, I'm an actual communist who's coming, and I'm a fucking jihadi communist.

Um,

who is very strong physically.

Um

I think, you know, I.

For someone who's natty, I guess, I mean, like, I bench.

10 reps incline, by the way.

This is incline.

What so there's two forty-five's on each side and then two tens on each side.

I don't want to do the math, but I can I do that for ten reps.

Um

I feel like I'm very strong.

I mean, I don't feel I am very strong compared to the average person, but that's not that important.

But I'm also like an actual jihadi communist, right?

Which is a pretty scary thing to be in America, I guess.

So it makes sense.

But I think that the real kicker is that I actually fucking believe in it.

Forget the knowledge I have, for forget the intellect I have or whatever.

It's that I actually just fucking believe in this.

And that terrifies people.

Not kilograms, alright?

What do you think?

I'm fucking crazy.

Definitely not kilograms.

Uh but yeah, I I think um

I am admittedly I'm not very tall.

I'm five eight.

Um which nowadays is actually quite short.

Um

But you, you know, you got the internet very the internet did a really good job of uh communicating that to me.

I'll tell you that.

They made it loud and clear.

That's really short.

Well, it's not, I know it's not really short, but it is, it is short.

Let's be real.

But I didn't know that before the internet.

I thought I was like, oh, who cares, right?

Anyway.

Um what was I gonna say?

But I I I I I do intimidate people, I do strike terror in their hearts, they do fear me and you know they're but they're also trying to block me from getting any exposure and that's where I start getting pissed off.

It's like, if you're scared of me, then your house belongs to me, your wife belongs to me, all your belongings belong to me, your car belongs to me, and all of your followers belong to me.

I mean, that's just how I see it personally.

If you're standing on anti-communism, but you're not willing to stand on business and you're running away trembling in fear from me, I feel like I should own everything you have because I'm your fucking dad now.

Now I'm your father, right?

And a lot of people are fucking terrified of me, but they're not, you know, they're not giving me what's owed.

Okay, bitch, you're trembling in fear.

Now give me your shit because it's mine now.

You know?

Um and that's the problem I have.

That's the real problem I have.

All of the Andrew Wilson knows me.

He debated me before.

You know, and and so he knows I'm an honorable person.

I think that's why he agreed to it.

But

And Joel Davis is another person I've debated three times, right?

Once recently and then twice in the past.

But beyond people like this, there is no right-winger who will debate me.

They're all fucking terrified of me.

And I'm sick of not I'm sick of that not being like

I'm sick of how there's no discourse about that.

Like, why is this high...

Why is this guy Haas so scary?

What is it about me that strikes so much fear in these people?

Now, when I'm talking about my physical strength, by the way, I'm joking.

I'm not in terms of that I have it.

I am very strong.

But this is clearly not the fucking reason, all right?

It has nothing to do with that.

It has everything to do with the fact that I represent a very scary position, you know?

And it's related to the essay I want to release tomorrow, which is that the whole new world order after the Cold War is a lie.

Everything we've been taught about world history is a lie.

Communism never actually died.

And if it's dead now, it was dead from the beginning.

A spectre is haunting Europe.

Bitch.

And that's always been something that's been very scary, even before the Soviet Union.

It's in the Communist Manifesto, right?

And I represent that.

I represent the fact that.

There is this other world that is there, that is very real, but hasn't been given the proper recognition that it deserves.

And it got me thinking a lot, like like an actual communist tankie who is like actually a communist.

I I think people see that as an unknown.

And it's very scary to them, you know, combined with me and my who I am, it's very terrifying to them.

Yeah, there's the Derrida stuff, you know, the the spooky Derrida stuff you can sprinkle in there.

But uh you know, it got me thinking also.

It's like

Christian otherworldliness.

Like when Jesus said, My kingdom is not of this world, right?

When the Bible talks about you know, when it when it when it rebukes those who fixate too much on this world,

It should get you thinking about what that actually means.

Because most people, I think.

including myself, up until a years ago or something, probably would interpret that in terms of the otherworldliness of like the noose sphere, like the mind, the otherworldliness of the ethereality and intangibility of thoughts, the otherworldliness of Plato's realm of forms and the, you know, the Greek philosophers and the the Greco-Roman Stoics, you know.

But I don't think there's any reason to believe that was actually what the original Christians meant.

I think the original Christians, when they talked about when Jesus said, My kingdom is not of this world, and when the Christians said, Is not of this world, you know what I think they were talking about?

Because you always contextualize it.

You know, um

This was a political struggle.

We know that from history, that the first Christians, it was a political war.

It was literally a world historical situation of war and struggle and revolution.

They were revolutionaries, right?

So what did they mean, my kingdom is not of this world?

Well, I'll simplify it for you.

You want to know a politician whose kingdom is of this world?

AOC.

AOC is of this world.

When she says we have to be realistic and go with the Democrats and we have to vote and we have to compromise, that's of this world, right?

That was the opportunist social democrats after World War I.

You want to know who said, My kingdom is not of this world?

Lenin did, in a sense, right?

Because he was insisting upon a completely different grounding, a completely different opening of the disclosure of a world.

It wasn't this world, it wasn't this established nexus of convention and possibility and prejudice and all the assumptions and wisdoms that are, you know, that accompany it.

It was like a different, you know, it was a Badusian event, if you will.

It's a new opening of a world.

It's the creation or it's the disclosure of a new world, right?

The birth of a new world.

And the world, it's not about communism as a different system.

It's not about a different society necessarily.

It's about a different horizon of symbolic meaning.

And what do I mean by symbolic meaning?

Right?

I mean it in the sense that.

Um

How do I simplify this for you without being too dense theoretically?

I mean this in the sense that.

You know

This world, quote unquote.

Is

Is a um

is is bound up with a specific

Um

Basis and foundation in a specific type of authority.

In a specific type of belief in the invincibility of this authority, a belief in the invincibility of money, the worship of money, right?

And why is there a worship of money?

I mean, think about it.

When Jesus said, a man cannot worship both money and God, right?

Um it gets you thinking, like, why why is gold or money so powerful?

And it's like, it's not because there's any intrinsic property of gold that makes it such.

It's because of a specific it's because it represents a specific social relation or you know, um series or totality of social relations, right?

And that is a world.

That itself is a world, right?

So when Jesus says, My kingdom is not of this world.

Why should it necessarily be assumed that this is an ethereal kind of supernatural dimension he's talking about?

I have a suspicion that what he's actually talking about is a different.

um symbolic universe, you know, a a a different

a different horizon and disclosure of universal existence itself, which of course is a world.

He said it is not of this world, right?

It's not of this world.

Well,

It's still a world though, but

He would have said it is not it is not of any world, right?

It's of some kind of purely supernatural, intangible, ethereal reality.

And, well, no, it's of it's clearly of some kind of world, just not this one.

And I think with the the Stoics and the Greco-Roman philosophers, the assumption, you know, EJ, what's up, man?

The assumption kind of began to.

began to um

Take hold that this is something that is.

no different than how most leftists think of communism.

It's so radically and fundamentally inconceivable and incomparable to anything that could ever possibly be real here or now,

That you should just associate it with the very intangibility of the mind and of ideas themselves.

Ideas are purer, thoughts are purer, fantasies are purer, desires can be purer.

That's purity.

But anything in the real world, anything that's real reality, that's you know, that's this world.

So, somewhere along the line, the distinction between you know the kingdom of God and this world became a distinction between reality itself and some kind of super reality, some kind of unreality.

You know, which is and and what is this unreality when you get down to it, right?

The unreality is the idolatry, okay?

It's an idol of the mind, it's a pagan idol of philosophy.

You may not know this, but Plato was a pagan.

The philosophers were pagans, they worshipped idols of thought.

Thought, so thought is a specific type of human activity.

When you produce a thought and you start worshiping that thought as the absolute horizon of universal reality and existence and whatever.

You're turning it into an idol in a way that is no different than if you were to use your hands to create a statue and worship the statue.

It's literally the same exact thing, there's no difference.

So that is idol worship that was smuggled into Christianity.

In my opinion.

Now, I don't want to offend people's religious beliefs.

But that's my opinion, that's how I see it.

And I'm not the most knowledgeable person about theology, and I could be wrong.

I'm just, you know, I'm just giving you.

what I think so far.

I my view could be subjected to change, you know.

And

Now people say, is this why you're a Muslim?

And I don't want to communicate falsely the idea that I think Islam is somehow less corrupted in terms of how it exists or who represents the religion than Christianity.

It's absolutely not my view.

And this is one of the reasons I underemphasize my Muslim background is not because I'm scared of it's not because I'm trying to not scare white people and I'm not afraid of scaring Christians.

It's actually because

I will invoke the wrath of

Who?

Of Muslims.

Islam is a religion of uh what is it now?

1.4, 1.5, 1.9?

What's the number of Muslims around the world?

1.9 billion, right?

Okay, I mean, it's a very lucrative business, though.

There are a lot of people who've made it a very lucrative business who make a lot, a lot of money selling indulgences on Islam.

And they have a very, very strict understanding of what that religion is, which is, you know, very much backed by billions of dollars, even, you know, and they have a lot of prestige and authority that they get from this, and they control so many fucking people.

So if I Haas started interpreting Islam in a new way or a different way than these guys who are making so much fucking money from it, and it's not just Sunnis, it's Shias too.

They're going to fucking come after me.

They're going to call me a heretic and they'll come after me.

Just like how Christians went after Rousseau, Rousseau, Jean Jacques, Jacques Rousseau, you know, he was the same.

He told the Protestants and the Catholics, hey, you guys are fighting over nothing.

It's kind of stupid.

Let's go back to the original Jesus.

That's what Rousseau said.

And they all came after him.

So Calvinist, what was it, Denmark?

Or was it the Nether?

I don't remember.

He went to a, was it Belgium?

I don't remember.

He got persecuted by the Calvinists, and the Catholics persecuted him.

And that's how the Muslims would treat me.

You know, the Muslims.

That's how I like to call them.

And so I don't want to deal with it.

I don't want to deal with it.

But I'd be making some very powerful enemies if I if I started talking about Islam.

The the way I I'm a you guys don't know this, but I'm a very strong believer.

Like I very belie I very much believe in it, you know.

But I just don't talk about it in public because like I'll be making a lot of fucking enemies if I do that.

And it's like I have everyone is attacking me at once all the time.

I have the Nazis, I have the ortho LARPers, you know.

Um, I have the Red Libs, I have the Democratic Socialists, I have the fake leftists, I have the actual Democrats, I have the Republican Conservatives, I I every it's just like every faction that's not us is currently at war with me.

So it's like Mountain Blade, and I'd be like, I'd be opening a new front and going to war with like the Dawah people in the UK or whatever.

Sublime, what's up?

And I just don't feel like doing that because it's a waste of my fucking time.

Um

That's why atheism is the safest position to to publicly communicate.

It's like, fuck you.

I'm not answerable or accountable to any man

I'm accountable to God.

So go fuck yourself, you bitch.

You know?

But uh

But you know, the the whole thing of being a Muslim Communist doesn't nobody likes me because of that, I guess.

But I don't want to compromise it because it's what I believe, you know, and it's um

But it it it does me no favors, put it that way.

So anyone who calls me a grifter, it's like, Okay, you're kinda stupid though when you think about it.

How am I grifting?

What do I fucking gain from this ridiculous quagmire I find myself in?

You know.

But, you know, the the the the article I'm

I'm gassing it up.

It's only like 2,500 words.

In fact, we can read it tonight.

Uh but

The article is very much about how

Communism's always been this boogeyman, not of this world.

Minister, what's up?

You know, very much

Not of this world in the sense that I mean, think you know.

As a communist, when Christ says, My kingdom is not of this world, I just find that so relatable because our kingdom is not of this fucking world.

It's not the world of CNN, it's not the world of the media, it's not the world of people's stupid conventions and assumptions and opinions, it's not the world of the fucking think tanks and institutions that gatekeep all the knowledge society has.

It's false knowledge, obviously.

It's not the world of the history books, it's not the world of the prevailing narratives, it's not the world of the politicians, it's not the world of the you know the civil society.

It's a different world.

It's literally a different world.

And it's real.

And it's the actual real world.

And this world is a fake one, you know?

It's a fake one.

I think one of the critiques of communism you'll find from religious people is this is what they'll say.

They'll say, you're trying to just bring heaven on earth.

So you're just trying to instead of the hereafter, instead of having the patience of the hereafter, you're trying to bring it on earth.

Coastal Warden, what's up, brother?

Appreciate you.

You're trying to just make that on earth and

It's materialist because you want the sensuous, tangible thing immediately.

You want immediate access to it, to consume and do something with it.

And they're like, this is why you're a materialist and you're a Satanist, because you're trying to make heaven on earth, which is, but this is the world, you know, this is the devil rules the real world, right?

This is the devil's kingdom.

So, but you're trying to, you know, mimic falsely heaven and bring that on the promise of heaven on earth itself when actually it belongs in the hereafter.

You should just be patient and not focus too excessively on this world.

You should just keep your mind always focused on the intangible and ethereal, you know, the purity of the hereafter or whatever.

And here's my problem with that.

It's that, let me throw something in the wrench.

How do you explain China then?

China where sometimes you you might find someone who'll say, Yeah, we're gonna have communism in five hundred years.

We're gonna have it long after any of us live to see it.

I mean, how do you even explain Deng Xiaoping?

Deng Xiaoping knew he wasn't going to seek the Communist kingdom and he still was fighting for it.

And he knew he wasn't going to have any immediate relief or reprieve.

So, this association of communist materialism with this crude, immediate, you know, greed or worldly materialism that's just so immediate, it doesn't explain.

the patience and wisdom of communists, who are fighting for something that they will never experience, ever, they will never personally experience it.

There are many communists who took bullets,

For the cause.

They're never going to see the, they're not going to see anything.

So, like, how do you explain that?

This is, by the way, I'm, you know, who I'm critiquing now is the Pope.

And sorry if that's

Is that not allowed?

I think it is allowed, right?

You can critique something he says.

That has nothing to do with the infallibility thing.

Because this is an uh argument the Pope made.

He said communism is just the kingdom of heaven on earth, and that's why it's a folly.

And I think this is a wrong uh I don't think this explains communism at all.

I don't think this is a corre correct understanding.

Because, look,

You you you

Have to understand, even if communism says it will be this world or a world.

Um

All that is doing is is having faith

It's having a greater amount of faith, I think, in the spiritual and in the heavenly and in the divine.

And why is that?

Because.

By understanding matter itself as something that's fully subsumed and subordinate to the logic of the divine.

You're actually, it's what it actually is, is a profound, profound faith that that.

That that is um

That is testament to.

It's a it's testament to a profound, profound degree of faith.

If I dwell in the idle conceit of my thoughts and say there's a heavenly hereafter and God's justice will just be that is just the stillness and purity of a thought.

And you can content yourself with that conceit.

To a point where there doesn't need to be faith.

You know, one of the or arguments the ortho LARPers love making is like, Oh, math proves God because it's intangible and God's intangible, so that means it's God or some stupid nonsense, platonic nonsense for second graders, right?

But um

Th that conceit of the divine or of the spiritual I think is just so easy to have without faith.

You're certain of it.

Just like I'm certain one plus one is two.

I'm absolutely certain of God.

I'm absolutely certain.

You know, it's a matter of analytical truth.

That, yeah, we're going to go to heaven.

It's just this intangible kingdom of pure thought.

Well, where's faith, though?

Where's faith?

Is it just that you're tapped into this specific influencer, gay liar, Jay Dyer?

Is that the faith that you're subscribing to him and you're tapping into this mimetic pattern of communication?

And that's not faith.

That's if it that generously, that's devotion.

It's not faith, though.

Faith is something very different.

You need to understand what I'm saying.

When they say faith, they're not talking about faith.

They're talking about devotion.

And by like, they're talking about your willingness to spread this and communicate this thought and your willingness to confessionally say that you believe it, you're tapped into it, and you know.

It's like how when leftists argue, like, oh, do you support Stalin or do you support Trotsky?

And they're both dead.

But what they're really asking you is, like, what?

What are you buying into?

What are you tap what are you like subscribing to in terms of like your

You what you believe, right?

But that's not faith.

That's not faith.

That's a Netflix subscription of the mind.

It's not faith, though.

You're, yeah, you're subscribing to a mimetic pattern of thought.

And you're devoting yourself to that, but that is not faith.

That is something different than faith, you know?

Faith has to involve risk.

Faith has to involve risk.

You know?

Faith has to involve.

A lack of an ability to preempt the outcome.

Faith is like Hagar in the desert.

aimlessly searching for water there's no water in the desert

And faith, there's gonna be water that springs up.

And that's her faith in God that she had.

And it did.

So the story goes.

It's an Islamic story.

But I'm sure there's many Christian stories that are similar.

That's faith.

You understand?

So when you think about it, faith is inherently materialist.

If faith was idealist, there's no faith, it's just certainty.

You have a mind, you have thoughts, you have logic.

Okay, where's the faith though?

Faith is materialist.

Because at issue in faith

Is something

Something that will

Be born of the material, something that will prove itself through the material.

That is what is at issue in faith.

What is at issue in faith is a material outcome, not an ideal outcome.

An ideal outcome involves no risk.

In Islam, God is merciful.

Why is God the God of mercy?

Because when you think about it, the whole weight of the stars and the heavenly bodies hanging over us, we are ants.

We are literal specks of dust, and in an instant, we could be crushed like we're nothing.

You cannot have certainty that you will live.

You cannot have certainty of humanity's existence.

You can't be certain about that.

Think about it.

Any day a meteor can come and hit us and just wipe us out, that's it.

And the extent to which

Life was possible.

How something like humanity emerges from this chaos?

I'm not being superstitious here.

I know, yeah, there's all sorts of theories of speciation and there's Darwin and whatever, but it's like.

It still speaks to a profound, you know, a delicateness.

That was necessary for this to happen, you know.

And that is merciful.

You know, that is mercy.

Mercy is when.

You could you you could very well be otherwise crushed.

You could very well otherwise be totally destroyed.

But by the beneficence of some presence or some will, right?

You're shown mercy.

You know, there's a recurring theme in Islam I always found fascinating.

Which is the believer who makes a deal with God, and the believer is not holding up their end of the bargain.

And yet God is still merciful to them, and even expects them to not hold their end of the bargain.

And it's like

That's mercy.

Mercy is when I have a contract with you, when I tell you it's literally debt.

It's all about that, by the way.

It's literally, not metaphorically, literally about debt.

You say, hey, you know, my crops failed, I need a loan, and I'll pay you back.

You know, but just can I have a loan?

And I give you the loan.

So you can start your farm up and then eventually pay me back, right?

Florence Nightingale, what's up?

So, listen to this though.

By the terms of our contract and our agreement.

Guess what?

I am in the right.

To demand from you that loan.

You owe it to me.

You literally owe it to me, and I'm within the right.

But you know what?

Is like one of the greatest deeds you could fulfill in Islam, as far as what I know.

It's like, show mercy.

Yeah, it is within your right.

That's true.

It's also within the right

of the heavenly bodies and the whole cosmos and the whole animal kingdom to crush you like a bug.

And by the beneficence of some mercy you are allowed to live and exist.

So by that same logic, you should forgive that person who can't pay you back, if they truly can't.

Forgive them.

We know you're in the right.

But it's mercy that has a m greater metaphysical and moral import.

Then the conceit

You know, of what uh of whatever contractual form of association you engage with with your fellow man, that's just an assumption of a certainty you cannot have, that that's always valid and that's always legitimate.

We try to our best ability.

For it to be such.

Mercy is not just mercy is not just charity.

It's not philanthropy.

You know, in Islam, at least.

Mercy is, is, is, um,

It's it's it's a it's a how should I put it?

It has an ontological significance.

It's a fundamental truth, you know, position of truth for the whole of universal existence.

That you are

Recognizing by showing acts of mercy.

You know, God was merciful to you.

By virtue of the fact that you exist and you did not need to exist.

You know, put in materialist terms, it's like.

You know how there's so much, there are so many ways in which we could be killed as human beings, and we're just not.

There's a chance you could have been born blind, and you weren't.

You know, there's a chance you could have died early, and you haven't.

You know, the chance is always there.

You can never be certain about it.

You can never be certain about it.

So it's like in a in a way, you can never fully know it or be certain.

Yeah, we can have science and have an extent to prevent yeah, sure.

We also you know, but you can never fully be certain.

And to that extent, there's a degree of mercy that

You are given just by existing and living and breathing, you know?

And this applies to so many things, you know.

Christianity, you know what the word for mercy in Christianity is?

Forgiveness.

And I think it means the same exact thing.

You know, it literally means the same thing.

Christ died.

You know, I know Muslims don't believe Christ died, but you know, see, this is why I'm a heretic, because like I don't care about these distinctions.

In Christianity, there's something meaningful about the fact that Christ dies, and I'm not here to erase that meaning, so I'll roll with it, you know, to the extent that I'm able to communicate the actual meaning, you know?

I'm not I'm not an imam, all right?

I'm not a religious authority.

I haven't I'm not a scholar, I haven't I'm just telling you like how I see it, you know?

Again, sorry, let me continue.

Um

So

What was I saying?

Um ah, yeah, there's so many things you could apply it to, even not just debt.

Also, you know what?

Another word for mercy is it's the benefit of the doubt.

It's ch it's uh good faith.

They call it good faith.

It's like I'll be merciful to you because I know that no one is God, no one is perfect, and you know.

I'm not going to sit here and assume the worst of your intentions just because you make mistakes and get things wrong.

That's another way of showing mercy.

And the thing I like about Islam, and I'm sure Christianity is the same, but this is just what I know.

Is it like

By default, you should be a merciful person, just like God is merciful.

That's the default.

Now, when you find out that someone is bad faith and is malicious, of course, you have a right to defend yourself.

You have a right to self-defense.

Because mercy can only be given from a position of strength.

And in Islam, strength is not necessarily being superior to others, but it's having the integrity of honor.

It's having honor to stand on and maintaining that honor.

And to maintain honor, you need to protect it.

Your honor must be protected.

I think that's one of the main differences with Christianity, actually.

I've noticed.

Maybe, right?

In Christianity, even a bum.

can forgive, right?

But

Can a bum show mercy to you?

You know?

In Christianity, a large degree of emphasis when it comes to forgiveness is placed on moral forgiveness.

Like, I forgive you morally.

So thank you for not thinking I'm a bad person, but are you really forgiving me though?

Are you really forgiving me as a human being?

Are you really forgiving me for like in terms of my actual existence?

It's like an evangelical can go into power and be like, listen up, poor people.

I forgive you morally, but you're still in debt and you're still.

And it's like, well, thank you for forgiving me, but it's like.

How can you prove your forgiveness is sincere and not just something born of convenience?

You know, that's my problem with Christianity.

It's like, how do you know if the forgiveness is a matter of convenience?

Or if it's sincere.

Like, it's hard to tell.

You know, another example of this is.

Leftists who lament Bolshevik terror.

They're like, oh, you know.

Um

They're like, uh ye yeah, you know, uh

I'm actually just gonna take the high road on this one and let the ruling class win.

And it's like to preserve my moral superiority.

And it's like uh

But, you know, how is that?

How are you superior if you're not doing it from a position of strength, though?

You know?

If you're not already in a position of strength, how can you be moral?

How is it moral to let the enemy win?

How is that moral?

You know?

And then there's there's a then there'll be like some.

I'm not saying all, I'm saying some the the one I don't personally like.

They'll be like.

Well, I'm taking the high road in my magic uh kingdom that's that's not real, but it's just like in my head.

And I'm like, all right.

That's the purity thing I don't like from the fake Christians, I guess I'd call them.

It's like, okay, you're taking the high road in a in your head, but not in the actual real world.

And don't tell me, oh, this is not the heavenly hereafter.

That's not what you're talking about.

You're talking about your head, you're talking about your thoughts.

You're not talking about some supernatural super world.

You're not talking about that.

Because that's actually something real at the end of the day.

You're talking about your thoughts.

And your head and your mind

It means you move on and you give people another chance.

Yeah, I I I agree.

I definitely agree, like 100%.

But you can't do that if you have no honor to stand on.

If your honor is gone and you're

You are not engaging in an action, you are engaging in the opposite.

You're passive, right?

That's why I prefer the word mercy, anyway, guys.

Is anyone offended by what I'm saying here?

Because, like, it's literally just I'm not a religious authority.

I'm not here to offend anyone's religion.

I'm a stupid, imperfect, you know, person.

I'm not here to

I'm

I'm just um spitballing, put it put it that way.

Like, I don't want to offend anyone or make it seem like I'm trying to say one religion is better than the other.

I'm just telling you, like, how I how I've seen it, you know?

Not necessarily how you should see it, because I could be wrong about all this stuff.

There could be a lot I'm missing, right?

Um

Yeah, oh yeah, you guys are all the California people.

That's alright, we love the California people.

Anyway, um

I don't think it's necessary to go over it so many times.

It's time to just say that religious people are included in this movement.

You know, Sabsee, that's true, it's a given, but I'm not actually pandering.

Um some people think like Ohaaz is really just an atheist.

And he's just pandering to religious people to not offend them.

Which I find it base that people think that, because I want people I don't want religious communities to feel like they can hold me accountable for not repeating the thought patterns they want me to repeat.

But I have to confess something to you guys and be honest.

As a communist,

This has the entire weight of religion for me.

Like, this is not a career.

This is not like a gimmick for me.

Like, I believe I have the same probably more.

Like the same way I believe in communism.

Uh not like as a society, but like as a

As an outlook and as a truth, and so on and so on.

Like that is cosmological, that is ontological, that is everything.

It has the same weight of and conviction as an ancient religious believer.

It's the same, I say ancient for a reason, it's the same thing, you know.

And it's like it's very hard for me to make sense of my communist conviction without oftentimes referencing in my own head religion.

It's very difficult.

And I reference both Christianity and Islam, you know.

I reference both of them.

You know, I think about Jesus a lot.

So I'm talking about it now, you know.

But I also think about Islam a lot, you know?

And this is how I make sense of my own Communist faith and conviction.

And this is the standard I measure it by.

And something I'll notice about philosophers, or self proclaimed philosophers,

Uh Kareem, that's a good question.

I'll I'll answer that in a second.

I just wanna r say this so I don't forget it.

Something I notice about philosophers is that always at the end of philosophy, it's just religion.

Can I tell you how many theorists and academic philosophers I've seen who are like Marxists exhaust the full extent and go the full way and they're like, you know what?

I just realized and proved through philosophy that Catholicism is correct.

And it's sad when I watch this because I'm like, no, you didn't.

You were just a Catholic the whole time.

You never actually became an atheist.

You're just a Catholic the whole time.

And you're coming full circle through philosophy.

Now Muslims do the same thing.

How do I know?

Because I did that, right?

I'm sure Orthodox people do the same thing.

Jewish people do the same thing.

They think that philosophy has produced this fundamental metaphysical truth that for some reason it parallels religion.

Wow.

And then they take that as like proof of that specific religion being correct.

And it's like, well, no.

Because philosophy is always downstream from faith.

Religious faith is the most fundamental thing.

And it's unconscious.

It's not just conscious.

It's unconscious.

Philosophy is purely conscious, you know.

relationships of thought.

That is fundamentally and fully downstream from religious conviction and faith.

So the whole time you were just realizing your religious faith that you already had in a different way.

And I'm kind of sick of people who are like, oh my god, it turns out to be religion.

And it's like, yeah.

But you're not thinking critically, you know.

I like to think critically about my religious faith.

I don't just say, oh, philosophy proves Islam.

It's like, well, I've always been a Muslim.

I've always had Muslim faith.

So I think critically about that.

I try to think about the other perspective.

I try to think about my blind spots that that gives me.

I try to think about the relationship between philosophy and religion in the first place.

And only then I feel like you're a cultured, universal, you know, Renaissance man.

I'm so sick of buffoons like.

You know.

They just like they're just philosophers and whoa!

Like, you know who did this was Al Thuser and all of Al Thuser's followers.

I'm not knocking on Catholics, but I'll tell you something I'm really annoyed of.

Oftentimes, there will be Italian-descended, Ellis Island-descended, Brooklyn academics.

Um, and Irish and Scottish, you know, Marxist academics.

And, you know, they'll read Marxism through Altuser and through Spinoza and through Hélène Badiou.

And then they're like, oh my god, Catholicism was the truth.

And I'm not knocking on the Catholic faith.

The Catholic faith is perfectly legitimate.

I'm just saying that specific procedure.

of trying to take oh the whole time Marxism was Catholicism.

You're not open enough to the biases you already had, which led you to interpret Marxism in the specific way you did through Spinoza and through Altuser, through Badou and so on, and through this whole current of French thinking, which was always Catholic.

Yeah, you were superficially calling yourself an atheist, but in the fundamental unconscious.

You know, um

view of reality or or existence you have is rooted in the religion you were born in, you know?

I'm just calling that but Jewish thinkers do the same.

Marxist Jewish thinkers, the Frankfurt School people, I like Benjamin.

I like Walter Benjamin, but sometimes they're just like Catholics, Jewish Marxists will be like, oh, I was an atheist.

But then, you know, when I thought really hard about Marxism, it turned out to just be Judaism.

And it's like,

Well, the way you were thinking about it was reflecting of the religious views you had in the first place.

So, no.

Um

No, like that's not what it proves.

You know, it doesn't prove that Marxism is.

Is that specific theological vision in particular?

Now, if you want to know what I think Marxism really is, is it Catholic, is it Jewish?

Is it Muslim?

It's all of them.

It's all of them.

All of these.

Marxism reflects the inner truth of all of these, you know?

And Marxism can be read through all of these religions.

But when we

Reduce it to one in particular to the exclusion of others, that's when I think we've committed a mistake, a dogmatism.

It's Abrahamic.

I'm sure you can reconcile Marxism with Confucianism and with the Eastern religions as well.

Like Buddhism and stuff.

I think people really need to re examine what Mark said about religion, because I feel like people still don't understand it.

Marx

When he said religion was the estranged reality of mankind, the alienated essence of man.

Um anonymous was Spinoza just a failed Muslim?

No.

Why didn't he convert?

Now we have Neil deGrasse Tyson and German sex clubs instead, and it sucks.

Man, it sucks.

Please do a European Islam Communism too.

Thanks, Hans.

Thank you so much.

I appreciate that.

Um what Marx was really trying to say is that

You know, religion is such an unexplored topic in general, but

Th there's a reason I think even Heidegger has to bracket religion, never engaging with it, you know?

Because

Religion is a far more fundamental way.

of relating

Thank you, E.

J., I appreciate it, of relating to being being as such, as Heidegger would put it, than anything that can be given articulation by thought consciously or within philosophy.

What religion is really about

is the it it Marx elevates

religion to the dignity of of the universal whole of humanity.

You know?

It's everything.

It's not ontology and metaphysics and one specific thing within the division of letter.

It's not politics.

It's not this specific horizon.

It's literally everything.

It's everything.

You know, it's literally everything.

It is religion is the way in which everything comes together.

comes together, you know, and points toward a more fundamental horizon of meaning, which is just it.

It's not some ethereal

Bluff of thought.

It's everything.

It's the truth of everything.

You know?

And like for Marx, that only religion has that ability within the whole alienated uh world of mankind and the division of labor within it.

Only religion is the human, the truly human.

sphere within that.

Everything else is just kind of

Separated from hu only religion, according to Marx, is man, the essence of man, separated from man itself as a particular sphere within the division of labor.

But it's man as such.

He's getting that from Feuerbach and so on and so on.

But you think man, he's debasing the religion to the worldly, or not the worldly, the thought of man that we have in our head, the conceit of man.

So it's like atheist humanism.

But it's more profound than that.

He's making a statement about how religion, on a more fundamental level, is the language, it's the vocabulary, it's the form of feeling.

He literally says the sensuous feeling, the affect, you know, given to mankind about everything, everything that matters as far as man is concerned.

Everything that matters, you know.

So that should be appreciated when you should never I don't I'm sick you should never, you know, get into philosophy and politics and be like, oh my god, this specific creed is

No, you should be more critical, you know, in the sense of like understand what religion actually is in the first place.

Now, ironically, I just told you this, and yet I'm gonna say something that might be unexpected.

I do think there is something uniquely Christian about Communism and Marxism.

And why that is, is because Christianity, the way I see it, was about giving expression to a specific schism, schism, metaphysical schism, historical schism, civilizational schism within humanity.

And it was the first way in which first for the first time that kind of schism was given recognition.

You know, it was later given expression as the worldly and the heavenly and thought and matter and all these kind of dualisms.

But originally, it was about how there was this strange parallel in Christianity between this small tribe, the Jews in Judea.

They're so small and insignificant, right?

There's a story going on within there, who cares, right?

Somehow, this is a parallel, it's a homology, it's a microcosm of the whole empire, the whole Roman Empire.

And it's like that was the schism.

That was the schism of these two dimensions of reality, like the inner and the outer, right?

Um

Or if you want to think about it, it was the Roman, the Greco-Roman, the Hellenics, and then the Semites.

You can also think of it that way.

But that was the that was the one of the fundamental divisions at question in Christianity.

How is it that something so big could be summarized and concentrated into something so small?

It's like God Himself, God Himself is concentrated into one man.

You know?

It's like a parallel for the whole Roman Empire and just this squabble within Judea, you know?

This whole horizon of universal existence and civilization, the whole fundamental truth of the empire was revealed in this local dispute, which was local.

It had no immediate universal significance at first.

Um

Now

Um, and Kareem, I haven't forgotten your question.

I'm gonna get to that right away, but uh.

Now, when Marxism talks about the estrangement of religion from man, you know, it talks about the alienation and estrangement.

And the division of labor and so on and so on.

That is the problematic.

That is the quintessential.

Thing that is at question in Christianity.

That is what Christianity was able to recognize, and that is what Christianity struggled with from the very beginning, is that there's this division that seems like you can be religious overtly, but like,

It doesn't correspond to the essence of religion.

The the the the essence and the form do not correspond.

And

There's something fundamentally Christian about communism because

Communism is insisting upon the same distinction and difference that Christ did.

Communism is saying that all of these

figures of morality and religion and authority and power, all of them are wrong, and they betray the very essence they pretend

To be co co um

to be um one with, you know?

Like

Is communism Satanism?

Is it immoralism?

No.

Is communism like, oh, we were going to evil, bad guys, or whatever?

No, it's the opposite.

It's giving expression to this.

It's what Logo said: that somehow the letter of the gospel and the spirit of the gospel became separated.

But that very separation is what Christianity gave recognition to for the first time in the first place.

And you know what?

You know, I'm not a dogmatic Muslim because Muslims did not conquer this.

Separation.

Muslims neglected this separation.

This is what I attribute to be the one of the factors in the fall of the Islamic world.

You know, why did Europe rise and Islamic world got the Turkey became the sick man of Europe and got left behind?

Well, you can, there's many causes, maybe, but Islam eventually got too comfortable because it neglected that fundamental distinction, you know, between the essence and the the appearance, between the form and the content.

It stopped problematizing that distinction.

And that's why, to me, to be a real Muslim in the 21st century, you have to go back to Christianity.

Because there's something in Christianity we Muslims, civilizationally speaking, skipped over too fast and we didn't give it enough weight and enough attention.

And the way we go back to Christianity is through communism.

That's how we Muslims go back to our own premises.

And, you know, it's crazy because the eschatology in Islam, it literally says the same thing I'm saying.

Because who comes in the end times?

Jesus does.

Jesus, the Messiah, returns with the Mahdi, you know, and defeats the Dajjal, right?

So Christianity comes...

Christ comes back.

So I think that was the way in which Muslims, if I'm a materialist, were giving recognition to the fact that they had some unaccounted business with the Christian foundations of Islam.

They were putting it off into the future.

Well, now it cannot be put off into the future.

Now the end times are here, and Christ returns through communism.

That is the return of Christ in in my esc Islamic eschatology, the way I see it.

Um, anyway, don't send this to the uh dogmatic Muslims because they'll get so pissed that I'm taking so many liberties talking about the religion in such a reckless way.

But it's like, uh, I'm about some real shit.

I'm not about some fake shit.

I'm about some real shit.

I'm about some real shit.

If I'm gonna talk about religion, it's gonna be real.

It's like, you know, it's like Tupac said, He's like, why should we care about religion?

He's like, What, you're gonna scare us about hell?

He said, They told us in hell, everybody's walking around like a zombie.

He's like, That's you know, that's Harlem or whatever.

That's that's Oakland.

I mean, people are already fucking walking, tweaking out drug addicts and shit.

He said, Oh, you're gonna get tortured.

And you're he said, We're already suffering here and now.

What are you gonna, you're gonna scare us?

You're not gonna scare us.

He said, The only way religion works is if it inspires us, you know, it, it, it, it, um.

If it's through inspiration and faith.

There's no compulsion in religion, you know?

Um

There's no compulsion in religion.

But uh look, I have to respond to the guy socialism done left.

Well, I'll briefly

I guess I'll be I'll briefly respond to it.

The part that he um

Talks about with me.

So, here's the thing.

So, because this guy's stupid, uh, and he is a really stupid guy, by the way.

He's like a 40-year-old creep or something.

I don't know.

He's like 50.

I don't even know how old he is.

Anyway, he's like the chief defender of women.

He's like the he sees himself as the papa bear of all women.

He's like, he's the male feminist women res women.

Uh authority, right?

All women are in his harem, and he's the guardian.

He's the alpha male.

That's how he sees himself.

But he's just like a creepy forty-nine-year-old, like, creepy guy.

Anyway, uh anyway, we have a long history with this retard.

But he made a video and his uh, what is it?

His smoking gun is this article by Dugan.

Now, when you read this article, which he doesn't do.

Which he doesn't do, all you find is Dugan saying actually like the actual real historical fascism, yeah, that was just national capitalism.

And what Dugan is what Dugan means by fascism is uh something totally different, that's not even real, like the actual fascism in history.

So it doesn't take long for Dugan, after writing this text in nineteen ninety seven, to actually just fully repudiate fascism itself, because it literally had nothing to do with what he was looking for.

And the only reason he was flirting with the word fascism, which I totally disagree with that he did, by the way, but the reason he did that is because in the immediate post Soviet context,

The it was the Communist Party of the Soviet Union that dissolved the Soviet Union, and then after the traditional kind of like in-power communism, there was just liberalism.

So Dugan's like, okay, so there's this other thing called fascism, that's the other alternative, which is a total mistake, by the way.

But it's like he didn't actually mean the real Nazism or like actual Mussolini fascism.

This, what he's talking about here is just some nebulous term that he's using to stand in for something that doesn't exist but is an alternative to both the Soviet communism and liberalism.

Now, I am pro-Soviet communism, but can I really blame Dugan for not being faithful to it after it was Gorbachev and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union that dissolved the Soviet Union in the first place?

You know?

And, you know, listen, by the

By the seventies there aren't many real

Die-hard believers in the Soviet Union anymore.

It's very cynical by the late 70s.

With the exception of guess who, Ivald Elienkov.

Now, I personally spoke at length with the Eurasian youth movement when I was in Moscow.

And they are all well-read on Ilyenkov.

They read Ilyenkov.

They take it seriously.

So they're not, you know, they're not anti-communists.

They just don't really.

They don't um

They don't feel like they can just fall back on the authority of a Soviet communism that was gone and is gone, you know?

But on the other hand, there's validity to the perspective of people from the KPRF which say no that authority is still here.

It's in the infrastructure, you know, it's in the legacy of the Soviet state, which is still here.

It's not fully gone.

And then the Eurasianists will say, well, that's true, but in this more metaphysical sense, it's not satisfying our need for making sense of reality.

And then, you know, the KPRF people might say, like, who cares about that?

You know, here it is.

So it's a kind of dispute where, obviously, I'm a communist and it's point a gun at me.

I'm with the KPRF.

But I sympathize with the Eurasianist view.

I think that I want there to be more dialogue.

I want there to be I don't think this is a fundamental disagreement, you know.

But um yeah, Dugan wrote this in 1997 and totally broke with.

broke with any flirtation with the word fascism

Or third positionism, uh, after in the 2000s, which is seriously concerned with the problem of power and feels acutely the power of time.

What are you talking about?

Yet, the quote, national capitalist, quote, right-wing variation of fascism does by no means exhaust the nature of this ideology.

Moreover, the union of the quote will dream to give birth to a society of the hero and the superman to change and transform the world.

Yeah, this is all the mythical nonsense that they build into it to conceal its basic purpose, as we were just reading earlier.

On the economic level, fascism is characterized rather by socialist or moderately socialist methods.

Yeah, but yeah, but um, does this guy not realize that he is accusing Nazi Germany and uh fascist Italy of just being national capitalist states?

Continuing, so what is Dugan disguising?

Do you think Dugan is literally working with Mussolini and Hitler, who are dead?

Dugan's writing this in 1997 when fascism.

Um depending on how you I mean I would say NATO was fascist, but that's clearly not what he's referring to.

It really doesn't have significance.

I don't know how concretely him writing this makes him a fascist.

Absolutely not take into account the specific philosophical self-reflection of fascist ideology and consciously ignores the fundamental core pathos of fascism, which again Marxism is not concerned with because it's concerned with class struggle, which is actually the motive force of history.

But continuous.

Also, all he has to do is say the phrase class struggle without telling us what it actually means, and that should satisfy our our curiosity.

Could be your devil on your angle.

But really, while this may appeal to some socially clueless edgelords, for those of us who understand ruling class ideology to be reflections of the material needs of the ruling class, how do you not see that this is a capitalism which needs to be more brutal, more violent, more anti-intellectual, more hateful and cruel, because it is trying to oppose the will of the masses who yearn for liberation?

Remember the

I don't think what Dugan is talking about here is even inherently fascist.

I think it could easily be applied to communism.

If you're talking about an impossible dream and a great myth and transcendental idea and a society of the hero, I think Dugan is talking about something that was there in the Soviet Union that he wants to tap into more.

Um.

But why are these things, you know, this is stupid.

The actual core purpose of fascism is to block socialist revolution.

So the ideology it comes up with is all about meeting that aim.

Continuing, he loves the cold and tragedy.

He does not like, I obviously agree that the purpose of fascism is to as anti-communism, but you're being dishonest if.

If you accuse Dugan of espousing that when he wrote this, that's clearly clearly Dugan is misusing the term fascism here, which I fully agree, he's misusing it.

But if Dugan is misusing the term fascism, then this text is not proof that he's a fascist.

Dugan is using the word fascism.

In a way, that's mistaken.

He's not talking about fascism, he's clearly talking about.

He's talking about uh s he's it's like he's it's like uh in the way that leftists say, Oh, there's no true communism, you know, it's like it's just like an i it's just like a projection for whatever ideal he wants to have.

It's a it's a l you know, totally intangible, n unreal thing.

Which is super anti-intellectual, and it's supposedly against the established traitors.

So it's this sort of meritocracy just based on brutality.

And I don't know who this would appeal to, other than people who've already bought into basically other toxically masculine, hyper-competitive ideology, and think of it.

Now when you when you start seeing this guy talk about hyper masculine, I mean

I went to Moscow and this guy

would probably lose his shit if he saw

How hyper-masculine Soviet aesthetics are.

Chris, what's up?

It's so hilarious because Liminov was the real Nazi, and leftists never call him out.

Only Dugan Liminov was the anarchist.

Yeah.

We all thought he was closer to fascism in the 90s.

So, this whole thing about like all masculine versus feminism, yeah, that's not at issue for actual world communism.

Like, that was never, oh, the difference between fascism and communism is that fascism is hyper-masculine.

It's like no one ever thought that in the actual communist world.

No one ever litigated the question of like the importance of manhood and like the masculine aesthetics of these big statues, you know, and like military power and these kind, like.

Militancy, comradeship, like these are, that was never called into question by any communist state ever.

That was a given, all right.

that they're gonna come out on top to anybody else.

This would sound like what Dugan is doing is just kind of mythologizing s the Soviet civilization and he's describing attributes of this civilization as fascist.

Because that's exactly what liberals in Russia were doing.

They were calling the Soviet Union red fascism.

So Dugan is just taking that, ripping that, and he's like running with it, I guess.

But to say this is actual fascism we're talking about here, I don't think so.

Torture.

Continuing, the central figures.

Actual fascism is not a philosophy or an ideal.

It was a real terrorist dictatorship of finance capital.

Fascist state and fascist myth are the peasant work as if Hitler wasn't an eager and enthusiastic anti-communist in his own right.

Anyway, well, Muslim

Until he got on the MI5 payroll and started beating up anti-World War I protesters.

That is an actual fact, by the way.

But yeah, the purpose is always to defend capitalism.

So, of course, there's gonna be mainly a conservative base.

Continuing national.

He's like, he's like, yeah, I know Dugan is saying Mussolini and Hitler and all these guys are like sold out or were under the payroll of the capitalists.

But like, yeah, dude, you didn't know that?

Like, like, you're not I need to remind this idiot that the goal of his video wasn't to show that Dugan.

Shouldn't have used the word fascism.

I agree that Dugan shouldn't have used that word.

Your goal was to show how Dugan himself is somehow a fascist, and you're not doing that.

You're proving the opposite by your own logic.

You're like, oh, yeah.

But Hitler was like under the payroll of the.

It's like, well, that's what he's saying here, too, though.

Owners and corporation heads.

Yeah, those were just, you know, oh, they had to forge alliances.

No, that's who they were working for.

Always.

Get this compromise.

Um

I agree with the commentator of this video as much as I hate him.

Yeah, I mean.

They weren't forced.

They definitely were from the beginning.

Like, I totally agree with that.

Um

But I don't I don't think that Dugan, you know, making a mistake historically here, I don't think that makes him a fascist.

I think that

I I just think that he

he could use the Marxist Leninist analysis of fascism definitely.

Um

But you know what?

He's acknowledging it, though.

That's the thing.

He's acknowledging the facts.

He's he's yeah, he's not

He's not giving enough attention to the causes, I agree.

But he at least he's recognizing the facts here, you know.

I don't think an actual fascist would say this.

Deplorable for the fascist regimes.

Well, no, it's just that it didn't really work, or it worked only to a limited extent.

The fanatic anti-communism of Hitler warmed up by the German.

I think see Dugan is trying to say like, oh, there's some ideal fascism that was obscured by the actual reality of fascism.

And that's his like illusion in this text.

And it's a false view he has, which is never proven, but it's just like a false ideal and fantasy.

And he himself recognizes this, you know, this is why he repudiates fascism later.

This is Britain in 1997.

And capitalists caused Germany to defeat and its war with the USSR.

Really?

So you're just going to blame the German capitalists for that, as if Hitler wasn't an eager and enthusiastic anti-I think Hitler was acting on behalf of the German capitalists.

Isn't that what you just said?

Communists.

What's the point of making the distinction?

Oh, right.

Anyway, while Mussolini, trusting into the honesty of the king, which, you know, any principled, intelligent person definitely would do who's trying to bring revolution to a country, revolution in several sets of scarecrows there.

Anyway, trusting to the honesty of the king, articulated the interests exactly of big business.

Yeah, so surprising.

Was delivered by him to the renegades by Dolo and Siano, put the Dutch chain to prison and threw themselves into the embrace of the Americans.

Franco held out the longest, and even that because of the concessions of liberal capitalists England and the USA.

Wait, are you telling me that the USA?

No, no, I don't believe it.

Wait, this guy's saying that the USA is willing to prop up anti-communist regimes?

No, no, that's not, that can't be true.

I'll be right back.

Okay, I'm back.

And I did some reading, and apparently that is a thing that happens.

All right.

And because of his rejection to support the ideologically related regimes of the Axis.

When you ask Dugan, though, you know, just read this.

Like, okay, what is real fascism, though?

He's clearly not referring to anything that has actually existed.

So concretely, he's not a fascist.

Dugan realizes that he's looking for he's just looking for something that satisfies the peculiarity of the historical predicament Russia had found itself in.

And he's using the word fascism here as an edgy provocation, because it's what liberals would constantly accuse, you know, this is the essence of authoritarianism, is fascism.

So Dugan is flirting with this, and I totally disagree with that.

Totally disagree with that, but it's not fair to call him a fascist.

All of the imperialist countries are fantastic to the market.

See, look, this guy is just reading it out and he's like chiming in with one or two sentences, making commentary.

So, this video isn't debunking anything or like saying anything really.

It's just like he's offering commentary in the form of like a sentence or two every paragraph, which okay and simple.

The literals.

So, let me just guess.

He's what the hell does this even mean?

Okay, like that's totally not materialist because, like, I don't understand it.

Excuses for Dugan and the people who follow him.

So, this is posted this year on Twitter.

I would suggest reading Dugan yourself rather than judging a guy from his early 20s.

Well, we're not judging him from his early 20s, and I get that.

I mean, actually, people in their 20s, you know, you're politically learning that's a time when people, generally from like a developmental perspective, are starting to switch from personal and family awareness into broader social consciousness.

And depending on in what society you're trying to do that, and that may take longer or a shorter period of time to come to some kind of actually good class-based politics that represent your actual class interests and an actual path to freedom for the poor and exploited people of the world.

But I think that we can contrast that kind of a situation with Dugan, who clearly was very committed to the fascist movement.

And I would say, judging from even his more recent writings, still is a good idea.

But what fascist movement?

Which one are you talking about?

Because the neo-Nazi movements, he totally repudiated them.

The racist movements, he totally the anti-immigrant racist movements, he repudiated.

So, which ones are you talking about?

Because you see, how is this guy a materialist?

He goes, Dugan was with the fascist movement.

And the proof is, look at this, look at this.

Look at this uh literary poetry nonsense he wrote in 1997 about this.

This this literal, like, artistic, aesthetic.

Um

Misuse of the word fascism.

Which is totally not referring to anything tangible or concrete at at all.

Let alone a real movement.

So, what fascist movement are we talking about here?

Is no matter how he might be more skillful today at cloaking that in, you know, however he's trying to sell it to geopolitics, Eurasia stuff.

So, yeah, anyway, rather than how he's changed since then, I would argue it really hasn't changed very much at all.

He's a post- Okay, why not, though?

Modern thinker that sees the world in terms of civilizations.

He isn't a Nazi, he isn't a fascist, he's a conservative Russian post-modernist.

Now, again, this is just running cover for a guy who very clearly is a fascist.

And the why?

Because he wrote something in 1997 that when you actually read it, isn't even it's not like he's like praising Hitler and shit.

It's like so stupid.

Worth political theory, sort of like the main work that he's known for, is just chock full of all the kinds of uh, well, we'll take something from Marx, but we're gonna bend it here.

And, you know, it's trying to dress up capitalist politics in some kind of revolutionary or socialist dressing, which is exactly look, look, I don't know what this guy's name is.

I hate calling him his name.

I'm just gonna call him the 40-year-old creep.

Oh, that's too long.

Um, dude, your goal here isn't to prove that Dugan's revolutionary credentials are not high up enough.

Oh, Dugan's a capitalist.

It's like, all right, whatever, man.

It's like, you know.

We're not saying Dugan's a communist.

We're not saying he's a Marxist-Leninist.

Like, nobody said that.

Nobody said Dugan was like a Marxist-Leninist.

What we're pushing back against is the attempt to cancel him by calling him a Nazi and associating anyone who engages with his work with Nazism, okay?

That's what we're pushing back against.

Nobody is trying to say that Dugan is the sixth head of Marxism.

Like, are you retarded?

Yes, you are retarded.

You're just a stupid person.

All the shit slinging and oh, Infracell, you're infracell.

The king of pussy calls me, yeah.

Whatever, dude.

It's like all this is just to make up for the fact that you're just a really stupid person.

You just haven't thought any of this out much.

You're holding Dugan to the standard of being a revolutionary Marxist-Leninist when nobody said that's what he was at all.

Actually, what he was describing at the end of fascism, borderless, and red.

Too much craziness on the left, calling everyone a fascist.

Well, I think in this case, it's justified.

And actually, I'll say it's unreasonable to say that it isn't.

So it's just craziness.

Like, oh, everything I don't like is fascism.

Well, I would say that people write essays calling for fascism borderless and red.

I would say that that person, you know, so that's your smoking gun, that one essay from 1997 when you actually read it, which he went where he denounces all the actual fascist movements and states as national capitalist.

And only when he, when called upon to describe what he means by fascism, is talking about something totally intangible and really not fascism at all.

There, you're justified.

Anyway, they take one thing or represent things out of context.

And which he doesn't even agree with anymore, by the way, which he repudiates now.

Bonkers on it.

What's the context that makes this okay?

Please tell me.

These same leftists fundamentally view things along the lines of Hitler, but express it differently a lot of the time, have the same philosophical foundations as you know what's crazy.

Like East Germany will literally have former Nazi Party members in the military, like in positions of authority.

you know, who repented for their wrong views.

But they were part of the Nazi party.

Which like carried out the Holocaust.

But Dugan wrote an edgy art piece in 1997 with no concrete connection to fascism at all in any way.

And somehow, this makes him like any association with him is like you are a Nazi yourself.

It's kind of crazy.

Assumptions, the will as driver of social reality, etc.

What are you talking about?

For me, this is in response to Dugan's fascism.

Now we're talking about these leftists are Hitler, which incidentally, we're going to talk about the rise of mega communism essay by Infracell, one of again, the co-founders of the American quote-unquote communist party.

This guy's so funny because if I saw him in real life, I just beat the shit out of him.

I'd slap the shit out of this guy.

He tries to disrespect me like this: like, oh, Infracel.

Infracel.

It's like, okay, I have a name, all right.

Um he's like trying to dehumanize me, you know?

Oh, okay.

Well, do it to my face, bitch.

Which again, Noah is one of the signatories of.

And there's this same ranting in there about the leftists or Nazis.

That's it.

I'd say 50% of the piece is basically that.

Anyway, for me, Noah, it serves a far greater purpose to actually engage with things on their own terms and understand them than it does to try to get people to dismiss them.

Well, we just read word for word through that entire thing and did try to put it into context.

It's just rehash warned over original wave fascism because there's Yeah, that's where you're wrong.

I don't see how it's original fascism at all.

I don't can you please find anything from the canon of actual official fascist

Canon like the officiated by the fascist parties is like part of their political literature that comes anywhere near close to what Dugan wrote in 1997.

There's nothing very shallow.

It has one purpose.

It is to try to confuse people into abandoning the revolution and to suppressing and opposing people who still try to pursue it.

Thank you, Berrio.

See, the thing is, Retard, it's not even that intelligent.

It's not even, you're giving it too much credit.

Fascism was not this huge movement.

It wasn't this like big thing.

It was literally just some thugs that the capitalists hired to beat people up.

And it seized power on the basis of a violent dictatorship that ruled through terror.

It was literally just the terroristic dictatorship of monopoly capital.

And some people were taking drugs while this happened, and they were taking cocaine.

And that's why Mussolini Oh, yeah, the will, the triumph of the will, and it's like there was nothing really profound behind it at all.

All right.

It wasn't like some serene, grand ideology.

You're giving it way too much credit.

Like the it's the Italian futurists and it's like

But there was also Russian futurists, so it's like it wasn't

You're reading too much into it, honestly.

But so, anyway, yeah, that's engaging with it on its terms.

So, doing that only makes people interested in them.

Well, again, we're not doing that, but even that argument, like, do you think that the entire mass of the population has the mentality of like a 13-year-old?

So, just strange.

You know why?

Probably like a f yeah, probably worse.

Most people are really stupid.

I mean, the fact that this guy has any followers or subscribers and that th that revere him as like a

Or regard him as like a credible person and not a total fucking retard proves that, yeah, most people are stupid as shit.

I know, know that Nazi doctrine is objectively wrong.

I don't know, was it the genocide?

Because I engaged with its theory, okay.

But you're saying that you've engaged with the theory of doing, although he actually says elsewhere that he hasn't really engaged, he hasn't read that much of Dugan, etc.

So, which is it?

So, you know that Dugan's okay, it's just a misunderstood.

All right, let's just skip to the part where he mentions me.

It is trying so hard at all times, all kinds of random phrases are put in Akali's words.

So, let me guess, he's not gonna engage with this, he's just gonna say he didn't understand it and pretend that that makes him smarter somehow.

No particular reason, but as far as the communism goes, you know, is this person the vanguard?

Some kind of theory?

No, let's control F.

You're not gonna read it and try to understand it, but let's just control F it and see what we can get in terms of the virtue signaling or the lack thereof.

A leader who should be forming a vanguard party that you should join.

No, let's just take a few quotes, which there's absolutely no context.

Okay, let's just take quotes out of context, which can possibly justify them here on page 24.

We have: quote: Communists do not want to, in quotes, socialize people's actual belongings.

True, if you mean personal property like toothbrushes, correct, or even businesses, wrong, profoundly wrong.

Communists do not want to socialize people's businesses.

What kind of communist are you?

I would say not a communist.

Well, you can say that, but in China, people are allowed to have businesses in the same way they're allowed to have belongings.

Now, the state ultimately owns everything, but people are allowed to engage in forms of entrepreneurship that are theirs, that they can take credit for, you know.

And you do not regard this is what you're not telling your audiences though.

You don't regard China as ruled by a legitimate Communist Party, but I do.

Um

I don't think

I think this idiot also confuses private property with individual property and by extension, private business with individual business or entrepreneurship.

So first of all, a communist state will probably encourage

Cooperative enterprise, but in individual enterprise will still exist after the seizure of dictatorship, after the seizure of power.

In fact, there's nothing inherently capitalist about enterprise.

Look up what enterprise means, you fucking retard, and it doesn't necessarily entail

Private property in the in the as far as Marx understands what private property is.

The private in private property is not.

The same thing as individual or somehow like discontinuous with a collective plan, a direct collective plan.

The private refers to something that is fundamentally unaccountable.

To the um

to the common reality of production.

That's what's meant by private.

It's fundamentally unaccountable and fundamentally unanswerable to in any way and alienated from.

Private property is a form of alienation, okay, if you read Marx.

Individual entrepreneurship can definitely exist under socialism.

Um entrepreneurial initiative can definitely exist within the context of a broader plan.

Um

uh uh which you know establishes a mode of production

as fulfilling

common uh goals, okay?

Moreover, you know, entrepreneurship is not about necessarily like ownership in the sense of sovereignty.

It's just about the ability to experiment and do things outside of established convention, economic activity that's done on the basis of risk and so on and so on.

This is what entrepreneurs in the Soviet Union, even within their rigid state planning, they had enterprises, that's what they called them.

If you n if you already know the outcome of all possible economic activity,

What are you talk you're not even talking about science anymore, you're talking about utopianism.

To know scientific socialism already implies that we do not automatically know all possible outcomes of economic activity.

There needs to be room for risk, there needs to be room for unknowns, there needs to be room for entrepreneurship.

Yeah, the Kole Coals has also had experimentation.

This guy doesn't even know what he's talking about.

Actually, that's extremely reminiscent of the quote that we read before in Dutt, the thing taken from the Fascist Week article, Fascism Calling to the Industrialists and Businessmen.

Quote, Fascism differs from socialism chiefly in this, that in the corporate state, you'll be left in possession of your business.

I'm addressing somebody who might have a small business on the side, you know, an online business maybe, where he had a good idea that he wanted like I'm addressing the people.

I'm not addressing the monopoly capitalist class.

I'm not addressing the actual ruling class.

I'm not addressing, you know, Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos or something.

I'm addressing people insofar as business is relatable on a personal level.

You know?

On a personal level.

You know who else is a business owner?

You are, you fucking hypocrite.

You own a fucking YouTube channel, which is a business.

If it's monetized, it's a business.

If you do anything outside be an employee, you are running a business of some kind or engaging in entrepreneurial activity.

I would say not a communist.

Actually, that's extremely reminiscent of the quote that we read before in Dutt, the thing taken from the fascist week.

It's not reminiscent at all, you fucking idiot.

I mean, holy shit.

Mao did not immediately socialize people's businesses.

That happened later, like a decade later.

After seizing power.

Okay.

So is Mao a fascist too?

You're such a fucking dishonest moron.

Article Fascism calling to the industrialists and businessmen, in which actual relations of production will develop will be a matter of history.

That sentence says nothing.

Marx and Engels something Okay, that says nothing, but that's what Marx and Engels say.

This is our his are historical laws being fulfills, not personal preferences or ideals.

In the complete sentence that through the course of the act I get stated that through the course of the actual development of the productive forces and we're starting to get on real shaky ground here, the institution of private property will become superfluous.

Well, capitalism has contradictions which block further development, but they continue because productive relations will develop as forms of free association.

Yeah, but if it's under the dictatorship of the proletariat, those fetters can be removed.

so that history can develop unfettered and un un you know, without being blocked.

Production will have a substantive human right.

But that doesn't mean all capitalist relations of production disappear overnight.

Or all aspects of those relations are immediately fetters.

That's not true.

They don't become fetters until they're actually fetters according to the logic of civil society and economics, not simply political ideology, the fulfillment of an ideal based on relations between people rather than abstractions like money.

And here we go.

Communists do not want to force this outcome on people, but allow it to happen.

Really?

So, what's a revolution?

Why have all communists been for revolution?

I have to educate this guy, and I'll be patient.

I can educate him.

So, socialism for all, and by the way, I'm a communist.

I know you want to play it safe with socialism.

That's fine.

You seize power because you're seizing political dictatorship, the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Under a dictatorship of the proletariat,

The actual historical development of the mode of production can occur

unabetted and without any fetters.

That's the reason.

The reason is to oversee a transition.

It's not to effect that transition by force, because the transition is happening on account of objective material and historical laws, not political ideals.

But the seizure of political power and dictatorship through revolution happens.

Because it is necessary

That the state and the superstructure, which is outmoded, right, by the time that this happens, which is now, you know, it's been over 100 years that the superstructure has been outmoded.

That this transition can actually occur, that it becomes, and it occurs through the unleashing of the productive forces, which monopoly capitalism and imperialism is a fetter on.

And Lenin talks about that.

And any Marxist worth

you know, worth anything talk about that, you know.

So, you just don't understand Marxism-Leninism.

Marxism-Leninism doesn't say you're going to force the communist mode of production by force.

We're not the ones forcing anything.

It's the current monopoly capitalists that are forcing, you know, the retardation of mankind.

They're halting progress by force.

So, if we have a dictatorship of the proletariat, we don't need to force anything.

As long as we have that dictatorship, things can flow according to the inner logic of the historical laws themselves.

So, you don't understand what Marxism-Leninism is.

You have an idealistic and voluntarist fascist view.

Your view is fascism, it's voluntarism, it's Giovanni Gentile, and that's what you are.

You're a fascist.

C2 can play at this game.

This is actually sounding a lot more like growing into socialism.

So, like Bernstein, Kautsky, renegade.

No, because Bernstein and Kautsky did not believe in a dictatorship of the proletariat and the smashing of the imperialist state machine.

Again, you're confusing two completely different things.

When a proletarian dictatorship seizes power and crushes the capitalist class, whatever policies they want to embark upon, that's on them.

There's no reformism, though, because you're in a position of dictatorship and it's the rule by a communist party.

So there's reformism and Bernstein, and this is irrelevant.

Okay?

Now, if you're a reformist, you're proposing a specific strategy in relation to politics and state power, which is one of we can reform the system, we can reform the politics and have policies gradually passed that will lead us to so that's reformism.

Reformism is not, you know, let's seize power violently and by force and then uh but but still, you know, allow the actual objective civil society and historical laws to develop freely and according to their actual inner rational logic, material according to the material laws of history, you know.

Um that is not reformism.

You are an idiot and a midwit who doesn't fucking understand this basic distinction.

The extremity of a ruling Communist Party's uh uh the radicalism of their policies has nothing to do with reformism.

Okay, because reformism is about revolutionary strategy or the lack thereof.

That's what reformism is about.

Opportunists and traitors to the working class.

Communists do not want to force this outcome on people, but allow it to happen.

What is the role of a communist?

So, the role of a communist is to overthrow the people that are not allowing it to happen.

Do you even believe in like, do you even believe in the objectiveness, like, historical fact of socialism?

Do you even believe that, like, according to historical laws, that socialism is inevitable?

Because I do.

That's what Marx and Engels believe.

That's what Lenin, that's what all Marxist-Leninists have always believed: that we're not voluntarily creating socialism and communism.

It's actually something inevitable according to historical laws.

But we have to deal with the political consequences of that fact, which is why we can't just passively sit by and wait for it to happen.

We have to actually remove the fetters on the mode of production.

I mean, like, is this guy an idiot?

Yeah, he is.

Never mind.

I already know that.

What is to be done?

I mean, is this just spontaneity?

Just documenting what the masses are doing?

Just allowing it.

What are you talking?

Why is he gibbering?

Why is he, like, saying I, this is why this is illiteracy is a crisis.

I wrote a whole text about the partisan and like he's talking about spontaneity and like, what are you talking passively observing the masses?

And I literally just like wrote an entire thing talking about like a very, very engaged form of subjectivity, the partisan, like literal militant warrior fighting in the trenches for communism.

It to happen.

What?

It could not happen at the expense of what the people want.

And that's true in that the masses drive history, but the masses are also driven by material interests, which the capitalists are constantly trying to get us to ignore and have consciousness of other.

Things instead of that, it could only happen as a result of the people's own historical development.

Yeah, but I mean, that's communist agitated, educated, and organized toward that purpose because capitalism causes imminent suffering, and we need to get okay.

So, what are you bitching about if you agree with what I said?

It's kind of crazy through it as fast as possible into where it's going to go inevitably if we survive that long.

You know, socialism or extinction.

Socialism is inevitable in the sense that if humanity has a future, it's a socialist one, but we don't necessarily have a future.

But that doesn't mean socialism is inevitable.

You understand the problem.

You don't believe in the objective historical basis of socialism.

So, you're a fascist or an anarchist at best.

You're an idealist, socialism for all.

And I can qualify what I mean by that.

You think that the meaning of the objective necessity or inevitability of socialism is that we're either going to have it or we go extinct.

Well, that doesn't make it inevitable at all.

For socialism to be inevitable, it has to be inevitable according to some kind of grander historical logic, or at least the logic of the capitalist mode of production itself.

That somehow socialism is arising according to the very nature of the contradictions of the previous mode of production.

This is how mode of productions develop and transition into different ones, right?

I mean, capitalism arose from feudalism and so on and so on.

That's not to say there's no political consequences of that, but you're trying to make it seem like the that socialism is inevitable because like you're gonna hold a gun to people's head and be like, you're gonna have it or the cl the planet is gonna blow up and it's like but that's just like a kind of that's a voluntary that's like a fascist you know um triumph of the will in the face of extinction or something but that's not that's still voluntarism that's not actually scientific socialism though is it you fucking idiot trying to he's trying to like dunk on me and he doesn't even know the basics

Um

Sure.

And that is something that communists actively do have to help to bring about.

That's the whole thing of the Vanguard again, read what is to be done.

They continue.

In the meantime.

Yeah, the whole goal of communists is to like tell ourselves that either it's the thing that we think will work or the world will blow up and everyone will go extinct and this somehow makes it inevitable why?

Like how does it actually make it like a matter of objective historical law?

Like nobody's disagreeing with the fact.

I mean it's I'm a Leninist that you have to be responsive to this in the form of waging actively the political struggle.

So you don't just sit by and wait for it to happen.

I agree.

But it's like to say that this has no basis in historical laws and that it only has a basis in.

Extinction

So, so our s you know what he he is?

I'm gonna just say he's like a Nazi biological determinist racial fascist.

Because he's saying our survival instincts are gonna kick in, which are owed to our biology, that we will be compelled to socialism because we're all as scared to die.

But I am a fucking Iranian terrorist, bitch.

That's a joke.

Whoever's listening to this, but like, I'm a Shia.

We fucking don't care about dying, bitch.

We will gladly go to death.

Where's my survival instinct?

Where's our survival instinct?

Where's Hezbollah's survival instinct?

So fuck you for trying to say that socialism is going to be born from the craven and cowardly passive biological instinct to survive.

Fuck you.

That's not what materialism means.

That's some vulgar Nazi bullshit biological reductionism.

That has nothing to do with materialism.

That's literally just like it ends with race science, what else?

'Cause then you're gonna say, Oh, so if if nations are material, then it's just biology and DNA and genes or whatever.

That's not fucking materialism.

That's that's the fucking uh ideology of a cow or some kind of passive cattle animal.

It's not a human world view.

Go fucking read Marx, you idiot.

You're not talking about materialism.

You're talking about biological determinism.

You're talking about like uh some fucking nonsense, like

You know

some neo Darwinism or some crazy shit.

Definitely not materialism.

Definitely not dialectics.

Materialist dialectics.

You know?

It's like some fucking gene tarred nonsense.

Wow, Lysenko should really have had the like total ability to just like slaughter these people, honestly.

Well, not this guy, but like people of his time that were like propagating this retarded worldview.

Lysenko literally should have just taken a chainsaw and slaughtered all the gene tards.

That's a joke.

I'm literally joking.

Literally joking.

Anyway.

Um yeah, this guy's like not talking of he thinks materialism is like the survival instinct.

There's no survival instinct.

Our life is mediated socially and historically.

We don't have

We don't have an inherent way to make meaningful sense of whatever biological fear of death we might plausibly have, and I'm still don't know if we really have that hardwired fear.

Because look at white people who like jump off roofs and shit.

Where's their instinct?

You know?

Anyway, um.

Uh yeah.

But you know, it's kinda correct what I'm saying though.

He's trying to ground Marxism in like survival.

It's so fucking stupid.

How miserable do you have to be to like wake up and this is what you believe?

He thinks Marxism is just survival and that's it.

Well, it's a fucking lousy thing to just survive for the sake of it, I think.

Why don't you go be a f cattle, like some kind of animal?

Can't he just debate you?

Fuck no, this guy won't debate me.

I literally just violated him from beyond the grave.

Like, I already killed him.

He's not gonna debate me.

I you have to understand the extent to which I've exposed this guy just has no familiarity with Marxism Leninism, like on a fundamental level.

Just from me reacting to him reacting to a paragraph I wrote two and a half years ago.

Or two years ago.

Like, you think he's gonna debate me?

This is just him reacting to a paragraph I wrote two years ago.

And from that, it's been exposed that he has no knowledge of communism or Marxism at all.

What communists?

No, this is a KKE guy.

He's with the KKE people.

So he's just with those guys.

The overthrow of the monopolists, the bankers, big pharma, big agriculture, big tech, and others, which have.

Oh, but didn't you say what I said was reminiscent of something a fascist said who was actually telling appeasing these people?

I jacked the American Republic.

It's just conservative language in the name of the sacred institution of private property.

Okay.

I wrote a sentence that is actually palpable to a person who isn't a communist yet, and you're bitching about it because apparently you are.

And, you know, this isn't, I'm not virtue signaling enough for you and the KKE.

Like, I don't want to be part of your fucking circle jerks and your little circles, socials and for all.

I actually want to talk to the masses.

I don't give a fuck about you gatekeeping bitches.

So just, I don't know, go kill yourself or something.

I mean, that's what the American Republic is based on.

That's what the whole system is about.

This is what we have to move through, actually.

And the only way to get through it is proletarianism.

Yeah, what a great thing to communicate.

The fundamental thing that you know and are like, you're not a communist.

You're not a fucking communist.

Okay.

This is not how communists talk.

Look at Dimitrov.

We have to reclaim history from the fascists.

We have to use history, you know?

And he's like, no, it's inherent.

All of your history is inherently capitalist.

Listen to me, socialism for all.

I'll provide you the way out.

It's just a first of all, like, okay, rhetorically it's wrong, but why is it also theoretically wrong?

Because it isn't an essential hist fact, it isn't an essential fact of the historical emergence of an American republic that it inevitably, it inevitably has to be this, you know, monopoly capitalism.

There are ways of properly inheriting the revolutionary legacy of the bourgeois revolutions that give way to a different outcome, you know?

Thank you so much, Lionel.

Like, no, it's not true.

It's not true that history had to result in this way.

Maybe retrospectively, sure.

Retrospectively, you can maybe say that.

But if you took a time machine to 1776 as a Communist, you could have led to a totally different outcome.

And by the way, Lenin didn't wait for stages of necessity to pass.

Neither did Mao.

By your logic, they should have done that, if what you're saying is true.

If it's necessary that every

Democratic Republic

necessarily had to go in the direction it did with monopoly capitalism,

Why didn't Mao why didn't that happen in China when the Democratic Republic was subsumed immediately by the proletarian dictatorship?

Or in Russia, in the case of Lenin?

And don't call the provisional government a democratic republic because it was a dictatorship and there was no elections.

You see, you're an idiot.

You're wrong rhetorically, but also theoretically.

But you're saying you don't want to force this outcome on people.

I mean, yes, like you can't do adventurous things that the masses don't support, but that's absolutely what communists are gearing up for, as soon as the masses realize its primacy and are ready to fight.

Anyway.

Then you don't have to force an outcome that the masses, in their capacity within civil society.

This is another distinction.

Because he thinks when the masses are going to get mobilized, they're going to be in a permanent state of political mobilization.

That's not true.

We all know from history that revolutions are carried about by like 10% of people.

And yeah, the masses all participate in a way.

But at the end of the day, life needs to go on.

Life needs to go on in a way that is normal for people, a sense of normality, a sense of routine, a sense of.

Rhythm, right?

And that is in a way that's not necessarily 24-7 going to be like directly fulfilling a political ideal.

So that's what you call civil society.

That's just the ordinary relationships people enter into on account of the merits of the very logic of their association, not necessarily their virtue signaling to an institution or their capacity to fulfill a political ideology.

And you don't appreciate that distinction because you're an idealist and a fascist.

The fascists are the ones that believed in screaming at people 24-7.

And they say, well, no, no, this is what Mao did with the Cultural Revolution.

Granted, that's a critique that Chinese people today have against the Cultural Revolution, that in vain they attempted to, you know, totally

replace civil society with ideology.

But there was more to the Cultural Revolution than that.

You know, there was also a critique of a growing bureaucracy and the critique of a kind of, you know, uh the recognition of the endurance of class struggle under socialism.

So it's a mixed bag, obviously.

Paragraph here.

You're just like fixated on all the bad things.

Page 25 is where it starts getting really bad.

The communist critique of private property allows for pro-people policies, including lowering taxation, ending government subsidies for monopolists, and removing red tape to actually happen because it places the interests of the people above the interests of money and so-called private property.

Communists want the people to have more things, not less or fewer, more wealth, more business, and more prosperity.

That's like the Jackson Hinkle quote that we played in the last video.

We're done on a conservative talk show.

Go ahead and show how it's wrong, though.

I guarantee you won't succeed.

We want people to have more businesses.

What are you talking about?

If the people have more of these things, then I think then the productive forces accelerate faster.

How did this guy even get into law school?

I understand why he didn't make it through law school, but anyway.

I didn't make it through law school, really?

Technically, I can go back to law school whenever I want formally.

I only took a leave of absence.

And I did that because I...

Should I even respond to this?

He's just a fucking lying piece of shit.

Again, I just like beat the shit out of this guy if I ever saw him.

Because it's like he didn't make it through law school.

You know how much

I'm gonna slap you in the face right now.

You know how much.

I'm going to destroy you.

And you know, you don't have this is the truth, and you'll know it's true, right?

Not only did I finish the hardest year of law school, which is 1L.

I did not attend ninety five percent of classes.

I didn't even attend them.

I did no readings.

I didn't even do any readings.

And I passed with flying colors for both semesters.

but it gets better.

For the entirety of the second semester I was streaming every single day for over four hours.

So I was streaming when I was in law school and I passed with flying colors without even fucking attending classes or reading the material.

Don't measure your cock with me, you fucking bitch.

You have nothing on me in terms of law school this, law school that.

You have no intelligence.

You have nothing compared to what I fucking pulled off.

Nobody will even believe what I pulled off with fucking law school.

Everyone here is a witness to that fact, by the way.

You all were with me my second semester of 1 L when I would bitch about it on stream every day.

The OGs remember.

Leashing human prosperity and creativity to the point where things like Wall Street, the city of London, and other enemies of the people will never have the chance to take power again.

So, again, one of the things that these Nasballs get criticized for is that it's like this petty bourgeois approach that is basically capitalist orientation.

And this is just the same.

Again, it's like the mass-based.

No, you fucking idiot.

It's just Leninism.

Lenin is the one who believed in tapping into the democratic petty bourgeoisie.

Why?

Because the monopoly bourgeoisie is institutionalized.

It's essence within civil society.

You're right.

It's ever reproducing itself in the countryside.

So politically speaking, Lenin tapped into this petty bourgeois peasant element.

The democratic petty bourgeoisie

Because it was an opportunity

to rip civil society from under the monopoly capitalist class that had out of its conceit institutionalized itself from that premise and from that basis.

By resetting capitalism, all you're doing

Is facilitating the transition out of capitalism.

When you reset the capitalist system and do land reform and basically give people all the bourgeois rights again and remove the red tape and whatever, like I said, what you're actually doing is referring to an institute you're removing an institutionalized fetter on the mode of production.

And you're allowing socialism as it is developing from civil society itself to breathe.

You're allowing it to actually take form from civil society.

So when you reset capitalism,

you know, the get rid of the monopolies and get rid of the institutionalized uh capitalist class and its power.

Just like China did after Deng Xiaoping's reforms, you know.

And you're just starting it from scratch, the same objective realities of civil society, like this is how people engage economically in association with each other when they're not compelled to politically or not forced to.

Like, this is how it is.

You are allowing that itself to develop and thereby facilitate the transition into a new mode of production itself.

Because it's on the basis of the logic of that civil society and those economic relations.

It's on the basis of that that socialism arises in the first place.

But why doesn't it just happen?

Because there's fetters that are institutionalized through political dictatorship of monopoly capitalism, right?

So

So, and how do you topple the monopolies?

You have to nationalize them.

So, that's already what Engels describes as the first steps of socialist production, right?

Some of the first steps that you have to take politically is like nationalism.

Read the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto, you fucking moron.

Ace of fascism is the petty bourgeoisie because they dream, as we're just talking.

Okay, but that was Trotsky's view, not Dmitrov's view.

Dmitrov did not think at all that the cause of fascism was the petty bourgeoisie.

For him, it was the opposite.

It was the monopoly financial class.

You're a fucking Trotskyite.

Talking about earlier in the duck work of a capitalism that's free of the class struggle, free of class contradictions, and the petty bourgeoisie can just have this merry existence.

Like, they're actually kind of the center of all this.

Anyway, the critique of private property doesn't mean taking property away from people.

That's super interesting because actually, the Communist Manifesto stated that bourgeois property is the highest form of private property, and that communism could be summed up in a single phrase, the abolition of private property.

Property means yeah, but private property today doesn't take the form of property that is tangible to actual people, like their homes and their cars, their personal belongings, or even their tangible businesses, you know, that they own in some kind of tangible human capacity.

The abstraction necessary to satisfy the criterion of what private property is in today's capitalism, as Marx saw it, it's at a scale you couldn't even imagine.

These are transnational financial institutions that are in no way relatable at an individual level at all.

So no, it doesn't mean taking property away from people.

The property that people have is not where private property is.

Private property has become institutionalized on a scale never before seen in history.

In terms of the scale and dimension by which it exists, it's nothing that is tangible at an individual level.

Meaning words about property.

So again, we're not talking about personal property.

This whole thing is communicated terribly to the extent that it even has any accurate message at all.

No, it communicates what it's meant to communicate.

You're just a gatekeeping bitch who's trying to put your glasses on and be like, oh, no, what I'm saying is palpable to people and it's correct theoretically.

And I'll take you to the bank any fucking day to prove it.

If you ever grow the balls to actually challenge me in a debate, which you'll never do.

Critique of private property doesn't mean taking away property from people.

Well, what does it mean?

Answering the next sentence.

It means using political power in a way that serves the common interests of the people rather than the private interests of money.

That is literally true.

Democrat.

No, because social democracy has nothing to do with economic policy.

It has everything to do with the strategy you have in relation to state dictatorship.

Because there is a state dictatorship of either monopoly capital or the proletarian class.

And social democracy is not about overthrowing the dictatorship of monopoly capital.

It's about embedding yourself within the system of imperialism in a specific way.

So no, it's not social democracy, you fucking midwit.

The decisive significance of social democracy has nothing to do with the extent of the radicalism of your economic policies.

It's about politics and dictatorship and revolution.

It's not about what you do when you actually take power.

Like, do you somehow fucking think that there could be like a social democratic revolution or like a social democratic dictatorship where like the social democratic party actually rules over everything and crushes under its feet the capitalist class, but just like institutes social democratic policies to create its own vision of society that's tamer?

That's not fucking possible.

There's no such thing as creating a society from scratch.

It's about a reference to the concrete reality of power here and now.

Social Democrats are conciliatory, submissive and subservient to imperialism, the one that actually tangibly exists, not a hypothetical theoretical one.

And that's basically where this ends up is just in reformism.

Because what's the next sentence?

The contractual forms of association between the people.

How is it re Again?

I had to explain to this guy what reformism is and isn't, and it's sad.

Which allow people to be like grandstanding as if he's like some grand theorist of Marxism or socialism or whatever.

Turns out to be a fucking retard that doesn't know the basics.

Cure their rights of ownership will continue to exist far into the future and will only disappear when they are rendered unnecessary by the productive forces, when no institutional challenge to their ownership will even exist.

So that is an anti-revolutionary statement.

That is growing into socialism.

That's saying that.

Yeah.

Yeah, this is anti-revolutionary because um 'cause it's totally talking about like

the actual state we have right now and like our relation to it.

The actual, like, actual state dictatorship that rules over us.

Like, yeah, you're such a fucking retard, dude.

This is reformism.

It's like, you don't even know what you're talking about.

You know where this guy got his politics from?

He probably got it from those like political compass balls.

You know those political compass balls?

Like, I'm the social democracy ball.

I'm the socialism ball.

And it's like, it has all these descriptions that like describe these like ideal versions of your vision of society from scratch.

And he's like, oh, you're the social democrat ball.

He's like, he's not even understanding what these terms refer to.

He thinks it refers to like economic policy and not like the decisive question of proletarian dictatorship.

Capitalism can just keep going on and on and on, and it will basically just wither away.

Well, no.

Capitalism can go on and on and on under a dictatorship of the proletariat, and yes, it will wither away.

Yeah, that's not reformism, that's just Marxism-Leninism.

Because but by the time that Lenin is coming to power, capitalism had already withered away.

But capitalism going on and on and on without the fetters of monopoly.

And all these other retardants on the laws of history, that's just socialism.

Like capitalism literally transitions into socialism according to its own logic.

It's just that this transition is obstructed through political dictatorship, through monopoly capital.

Do you guys understand what I'm saying?

I feel like it's so simple.

It has to be ended in a proletarian revolution.

But instead, Infracel is saying that well, he's couching it in contractual forms of association between the people.

But we're talking about private property here throughout the paragraph.

So how is that abolished?

Well, it will quote continue to exist far into the future, and it will only disappear

No, contractual forms of association are actually not private property.

Again, you don't understand the terms you're using.

Private property is a specific institution of alienation.

Contractual forms of association between people can definitely be conducive to concrete social and common goals.

The reason there's contractual association is just a matter of knowledge, like to what extent.

Are these relations and their outcome known beforehand?

If you don't have the knowledge, then there has to be a contractual form of association where you define the limits of your association in some kind of way.

But just because you're defining the limits of your association contractually doesn't mean that that association itself has to constitute or be conducive to the creation or establishment of private property.

Like the key word is the limit.

The limit doesn't have to be private in the sense that it's like uh fully unaccountable to society or somehow completely incongruous with the social logic of production.

When it meaning private property, contractual doesn't know there's socialist forms of property, he does just doesn't understand these things because he's an idiot.

Which again, contractual forms of association is such a bullshit, a big way of removing yourself from what you're actually talking about.

But when they're why, I feel like it's pretty concrete.

I feel like it's like forms of association that are.

a.

not compelled directly by political force and b where both parties can define the limits of their association.

What is so bullshit about that, you fucking retard?

Rendered unnecessary by the productive forces when no institutional challenge to their ownership will even exist.

Well, what's an institutional challenge to their ownership?

He's talking.

Um, how about monopoly capital?

How about things like the Federal Reserve?

How about state how about state capture, right?

Um, how about like actual fucking bourgeois dictatorship that suppresses the productive forces and gobbles it up to serve the rentier monopoly capitalists?

Those are all institutional challenges.

to the people's owner people's ability to own things.

So what do you mean th capitalism itself is the institutional challenge?

Because capitalism alienates people from the reality of production.

Capitalism alienates people from the mode of production and all the things owned by human beings.

If there's no alienation and there's no capitalism, there's no challenge to the human ownership of the economic reality.

It is qualitatively owned by human beings.

That is not called into question in any kind of way.

But with alienation and with capitalism, it is called into question because the ownership

Um

acquires the abstraction, you know, like of the commodity form.

and loses the quality of human concreteness and tangibility.

And so it just serves this never ending prof process of profit for its own sake, you know.

Of money begetting money for its own sake, that's what it ends with, M M prime, without mediation, even by commodities.

This is a fictitious capital.

And that is the institutionalization of the alienation Marx talks about the talking about capitalists trying to defend capitalism.

He's saying that basically capitalism will end just when the capitalists basically just walk away from capitalism.

That's not how it works.

That's ridiculous.

No, capitalism will end when a few things are accomplished.

One, when the proletariat wrests political dictatorship away from the bourgeoisie, and two, on the basis of that, facilitates the transition to a new mode of production through removing fetters on that transition within civil society.

Isolating the tendencies and seeds within civil society.

I'll give you an example of this.

The Kolkhozes were not actually designed in Moscow.

They weren't designed by the Bolsheviks.

The Kolkoses were actually a spontaneous tendency that the Bolsheviks observed as one of the ways in which the peasants were responding to the land reform, the the cooperative movement.

It was a movement.

And what the Bolsheviks did is they started looking toward that tendency in that movement and started encouraging it.

They started encouraging it.

And

That encouragement is what led to the collectivization later on.

But the Kolkhozes were a great example of how, from civil society itself, there were socialist forms of association that didn't.

Marx also even talks about this in the case of Russia before long before the revolution with the Upshina or whatever, however, you say it.

And that was a case where it was just there.

You just have to encourage it and allow it to flourish.

But you don't need to force it.

You don't need to create it from scratch.

It's completely anti-Leninist for one thing.

Lenin was saying.

No, it's not.

According to the logic of production itself, for example, socialism, even according to, let's say you have China, right?

Well, in China, the socialization of.

of enterprise is more lucrative than purely individual enterprise in most cases.

And in this way, the logic of socialist production

Acquire supremacy over the capitalist kind, even according to the logic of the former mode of production.

This is what we're talking about.

A hundred years ago, that conditions were already right for the proletariat to challenge capitalists for power, but interest.

Yeah, but the proletariat waging the political class struggle is not.

Immediately identical with the immediate destruction of all the vestiges of capitalist society at the civil society level.

That takes much longer.

So the so capit so capitalism at the level of civil society will not fully be eradicated, all of its traces, uh, in any like foreseeable time frame.

That you can imagine a hundred years ago today with AI, I mean, maybe I don't know, but.

You know, like that is not the same thing as the political class struggle.

Those are different things.

They're related, obviously, but they're not the same.

No, you don't wait because you're in power and you're a communist.

See, this all comes down to China.

This guy doesn't believe China is socialist.

He doesn't believe China is ruled by a legitimate Communist Party.

So just fucking say that, you fucking coward and pussy, instead of trying to like deceive people and mislead them.

All we are are dengues, right?

But you're trying to make it seem like we're like fascists or something in a way that would not be considered controversial by your own audience.

Go tell your own fucking audience that all we are are dengues and see how many people disagree with your hostility toward us.

You have to also lie and claim we're all these other things as if there's no precedent within Marxism at all for what we believe in order to discredit us and delegitimize us.

Then they'll just disappear on their own and the capitalists won't even challenge you.

This is just social democracy.

And it sounds to me like an extension of the Chinese idea, like we just have to keep building up the productive forces and just yeah, but China isn't social democracy because it's ruled by a proletarian dictatorship.

Magically, you know, things happen on their own from there.

Again, this is just Bernsteinian, Kauskian, and revisionism.

Again, I don't want to repeat myself, but it's like it's kind of outrageous how he confuses Bernstein and Kautsky's political reformism with Deng Xiaoping's economic policy of socialist markets and stuff.

You peel away the bluster, you peel away the ranting about leftists and bread tube and saying based every three seconds.

That's what you got.

So I'd like to close here.

That's what you got.

Well, I'll let you guys decide that for yourself.

J Summit, if you ever see this, make a video of this and upload it to YouTube.

And uh yeah.

Yeah.

Alright guys, I want you guys to.

Why did I subject you to this?

Because I want you to understand the logic.

When you're debating these people or arguing with them, understand where we're actually coming from and understand why, you know?

Um but yeah.

That was uh an hour of that.

See you guys.

See you Tuesday.