🔴 RED NEWS | MASSIVE DEBATE ROYALE | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES

I'm in Saga, I'm sorry,

I'm gonna,

I'm gonna,

oh,

I'm gonna, I'm gonna,

I'm gonna,

I'm gonna,

oh, I'm

a,

Nna,

Nna, Nna,

Nna,

Nna,avna, nani. And then the whole don't know how to be said I'm the world and I'm

a lot N'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'n'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' I'm gonna be like that I'm gonna miss like that I'm gonna be

and I'm gonna be

and I'm gonna be

I'm gonna be and you know I'm gonna be able to be able to be saddened

or something like to watch the world

I would say to love to love to turn to me I'm not going to be. At the glabot, I'm in a bit of a star, I'm in aught

man,

oh,

oh,

I'm, na, nina,

I'm,

oh,

oh, oh, my,

nina, nina,

Nna,

oh, oh, I'm a nina, one no no no

no

nina

nina

oh

I'm

nina

oh

nina

nina nina

nina

nina nina nina nina nina Nina, Nina, oh, I'm gonna'i, Nina, oh,

I know, nina, nina, nina.

I was at the tithi chambon da,

and I'm sitting chan by,

I just the one of the world I'm in

so varan't jacqueline.

I'm not nina,. I know Nina,

Nina, Nina,

Nita, Nina,

Nita,

Nina,

oh,

Nna, Nna,

Nga,

go,

go, go, Midsake

Sake

and I'm

so

I'm so I'm about and I'm about and I'm about and I'm at the chat with us and everything else. I'm sorry and I think I'd like to be.

I'm happy. The and you know

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm not going to shan bocund, I see what I'm not

I'm at the

I'm at the cramphot

you come I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm I'm I mean, that I mean, Nihanna, Nita, oh

Nita Nita

Oh,

Narni Nna,

Nia,

N

N N N N N N N N N.

Sast

N

N N N N N nina, I'm not that you, I'm gonna, I'm gonna,

I'm,

I'm,

I think of

I'm

there,

I'm

I'm

Nata, Nna,

Oh,

Nna, Nna,

Nna,

Nna,

Nna, Nna, Nna, Nita Nani-na-N-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-N-A-W. the I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

that I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm man man man oh my nana nina oh kandadda rinna oh

oh my nana nina

nana I mean, I'm gonna, nina, oh,

I'm gonna, nina, oh,

I'midda, nina, oh,

I'm gonna, nis,

I'm gonna, I'm gonna,

and I'm gonna,

and I'm gonna' Chame Chambon

I'm

Nita

I'm

Nata

Nita

Nina Nina Nina

Nina

Nina

Nina

Nna

Nna Oh Gob Gob Gau Gau I'm I Gau I G Gau I Nani, nina, oh, Nina, nina, no, no,

go,

but I'm going to be in a

she,

and disliked

so I'm

so I'm

so I'm so I'm Kakiita

and I'm

so

and I'm

so and so you know

the

you're

I'm The I'm a lot of

the I'm sorry I'm

I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm gonnae ninae nina o

oh i nani-na-na-no-no-no-no-no-oh

can-da-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-a-oh. I-n-n-n-n-n-a-na-n-na-no-no-no-no-no. Garni-da-n-n-na-o, oh, N-N-N-N-N-A. S'-as-n-n-n-k, and I'm my sonned Nara

Nina

Nina

Nina

Nina

Nina

Oh

Nina Nina

Nina

Nita

Gau

Gau Gau Gau Gau

Saki

I'm

Siv

Sire

I'm so I'm so I'm I'm so I'm and I guess I've got chanced and see if you're seeing what I'm in

my own so we

and I'm

like I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm both of me, I've been surprised about each of not

time.

I'm gonna be

oh,

oh,

na nina,

nina,

oh,

nana,

oh,

nna, nina, no,

nina,

nina,

oh,

oh, la nina, nina oh no nana no nina

oh my

nas

d'a nina

oh

dada nana

dana

nina

nna

nina

nina

N N N N N

N N N ghani da nina oh oh nani nina nina i sas nats natschampo nita i s'i tis ch'n'tani i i i'm da'nid nina i i ii nina i and not many, Nih-N-N-N-A-N-N-A-N-A-N-A-N-A-N-A.

N-N-N-A-N-A-K-G-G-G-G.

Go-gogo,

me-vis-kissack-chach,

and I'm sorry-wee-wee-ta-ha, but I'm so we can't be able to be able to be happy ones so we need to have the other than we're

happy people and so you're going to

you're

going to

the so and so you know

the

you're I'm I'm

I'm gonna'alli, and I'm gonna'n't I.

I'm a lot of

I'm a

so on I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm nina nina o khani nina

oh

i nani na nina

nina

oh

kandana

nina

nina

nis

a bit chamb

honda

and

i t'n i and n' n' and the chasemotty chavon d'i and then

I don't know

the way

and I'm

not no

I'm

and

I'm

N'n'n'

N'a'n'n'n'n'n' N'a'n'n-n-n-n-n-n-na-n-na-o.

K'-korn-n-n-n-o-no-no.

I can't know who is in chas-kissue-kissi for-sa.

But I'm so we've got to becky, and I'm I'm I'm

I'm

back I'm gonna'a'n't know how many I'm gonna'n't

I'm gonna'n

I'm gonna'n

I'm gonna'n

I'm gonna'n N'na'n'na'n'n'n'n'n'n''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' nina no no no no no no no no no no no no no, no, no. I know, oh,

I know,

I know,

I know

oh,

Ina,

Nina, Nina, I'm

I'm

and I,

I'm

man,

and I

and I have a God, I'm that I'm not I think of God, I'm

a lot of

I'm that I'm

that I'm

I'm

Nena

Oh

Nina

Nina Nina Oh

Nina

Nina

Nina

Oh Mug Mug Miz I I say I I I can't I I'm I know, I, no, no, go, go, go,

and I see see her, and that's shot,

you know, so much, I'm sorry,

and I'm sorry, and I can't get back in my life,

and I're going to

the

you're

and

you're

I'm

and

you're and you know so I'm I'm

I'm open

I'm

I'm not

I'm not

I'm not

I'm gonna

come from

I'm I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm

oh oh honey I'm I'm I'm I'm just a nana, nina, oh, oh, nani, nina,

Nita, nina,

oh,

oh, oh,

yeah,

Nita,

Nina,

Nita,

Nna,

Nita,

Nita,

Nina, Nina Nina, oh, Ina, no, nina.

So, I'm not that you chavokandah, I, so I'm not telling you,

I've got to me, and I'm besse, and I'm not telling you.

Nita, Nita, oh, n'alli, nina, oh,

Nna, Nita, Nita,

Nita, Nita,

oh,

Nita, Nita, oh,

Nna, Nna, Nita.

Oh, and Mugug

she's

Kuh,

but I'm

Sark Suc I'm gonnae see what I'm gonna say I'm at the

I'm gonna be

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

on the

I'm

I'm gonna

I'm

I'm gonna

I'm

I'm I'm gonna

I'm

I'm

I'm gonna I'mvar I'm not time I'm

Nara

Nita

Nita

Nita

Nita Nita Nita

Oh

Nna

Nna

Nna Nna

Nna

Nna

Nna

Nna

Nna

N

N N ninao, oh, nina nina nina

nita,

no

nita, no

no Nani, Nina, oh, Nna, Nna, Nita,

I said I'm a lot of Kandah,

I'm a city of Natchez,

I'm a city's chaffa Nata'i,

I'd have been

I've been a little,

so I'm a lot of

Nita, Nina, Nita,

Nina, Nita, Nita, Nina, oh, Nna, Nina, Nita, Nita.

Nita, Nita, Nita, oh, Nita, no, no.

Go, go, go, go, B'i's

like, I'm going to be surprised.

But I'm so, I think,

and I can't get a bit, I'm going, and I think my love to be. I think my love to be. and the you know

the

I'm

the Thank you. I'm

a lot of

I'm sorry that I'm gonna'n't I'm gonna'n't I'm a messar

and I'm gonna'n'an'n'n'na

oh,

I'm gonna'n'na, oh, I'm,

da'n'na,

d'n-na-o-kina-na-na-na-na-na-o,

Dian-da-a-n-na-na-na-na-a-na-a.

I've satan-tichamondda,

and I, say, and I'm not-ta-a-lott-o me and I'm gonna, I'm gonna'alli. I think of the body,

but I'm,

I'm gonna'am,

N'Atani, N'A'N'na,

N'na, N'na,

N'N'an, N'A, O'n, I've been. I'm gonna, no, go back

and I see she

and the shaltese,

my and I'm gonna be

and see if you

and

and see The I'm I'm I'm We're

I'm

I'm gonna do you know, I'm gonna'i

I think that would have

I bethurtabia

and I'm

there,

I'm

man, can't do not be now oh ina nana nina

nina

nina I'm gonna'a-na-n-n-na-n-na-n-na-na-o-khan-a-n-n-na-n-a-n-a.

I've said, I'm a-a-di-cham-da-i, I see-chap on-ta-lattie.

I'd have been, I've been so on, I'm not only, I think of all the I'm that I'm I'm

a lot

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm, I, go, go, go, and so I'm going to go, go, and I'm in sight of

the same thing,

and I'm sorry,

like I'm in my

and I'm going to be

and I'm

a little bit and you know

to

you're

I'm going to be. You know, The I'm I don't know

I'm

I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

I'm going to I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

And so and I'm not Oh

I'm

I'm

I'm not

I'm I don't know. I don't know.

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm go. I'm going to be able to be a

and the

I'm going to be and I don't know

I'm

and

I'm not going to be able to be. I'm going to

I'm

and

I'm uh, I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to and the I don't know

I'm going to

I'm and I don't know Hello

And let's see

There's no one to think

All right

Hello

Welcome everyone Today's going to be a Chiller stream All right. Hello. Welcome, everyone.

Today's going to be a chiller stream than yesterday.

Not a lot of the anger, not a lot of the emotions running high.

But nonetheless, a very important stream that i want you guys to save and i'm going to tell you parts to clip even and whatever because there's a lot i think needs to be clarified about the recent offensive

we're going to be waging against the Democratic

Socialists of America, the DSA.

Actually,

I wanted to start the stream by saying

that it was completely mistaken. You see, I'm Hans, Fjord Hans, from Sweden, and I wanted to say that, you know, the future of American politics is going to really be about the Nordic model. We're going to basically

have IKEA socialism. And basically, you know, it's all about the Nordic model. And, you know,

you see, this is what's going to create and defeat capitalism, because we really don't want to defeat capitalism. It's really discolysm. It's not, it's the capitalism. It's just like an existential crisis. And it's just like, we're going to sit in IKEA and just have, you know, it's going to be so, it's going to be so, it's just like, we're going to sit in IKEA and just have, you know,

it's going to be so,

it's going to be so fetch,

like they say in mean girls, you know, we're all in

New York, and, you know, we just

want the Nordic socialism,

and then this is what the DSA is all about.

You see, it's just, it's so, it's so trendy. I mean, why don't we just all have free shit, you know?

Just everything, make it all free.

I mean, just everything for free, like they do in Europe.

Have you been to Europe? I was in Paris.

Oh my God, Europe is so nice.

Anyway, I can't tell what character I'm playing right now.

But, uh, basically, we're going to be the DSA and it's going to be about Nordic socialism.

And basically, what we're going to do is, more or less, we're going to basically,

well, it's basically the same thing as Adolf Hitler, but, you know, because when, you know,

when the Germans came and occupied us, we completely collaborated with them and did nothing to fight them a resistant because all we care about is IKEA and Nordic socialism.

And, you know, I was going to America and basically, you know, in America, they just, it's just like Americans love so much sugar. You know, I'm Hans Fjord and I'm from Sweden and Americans just, they just have so much sugar. You know, it's just like, I go to the coffee shop and I say, can I have a baguette?

You know, it's a famous pastry we have here in Europe, here in Europe, you know.

And I had my baguette, and, you know, I was shocked at the content of sugar,

and I said, wow, Americans truly

love their sugar. I did

see an advertisement for

Dairy Queen, and it seemed like there was some

new delicacies in cuisine, of course

not as exquisitely presented

as we do in Europe

here in Europe

anyway I went to the dairy queen

and I basically asked for their

double chunk chocolate pumpkin

coffee ice cream

and lo and behold

it is really just sugar. So I see, there is no exquisite sensitivity to the delicacies of taste. It's just sugar. That's just what Americans like is sugar. I'm so smart. I was educated in a fucking university. And we have free health care.

And we are Nordic. And then who fucking pays for? We pay for it. The American dollar pays for it.

Europe is a welfare queen from the Marshall Plan. so I don't want to hear this shit about

Nordic socialism because we're already paying for them.

Did you know that we're paying for their health care?

We pay for everyone's fucking health care because it's our country that set up our government or whatever, our deep state, they set up the entire global system that, you know, Europe is living at the beneficence of the American worker, frankly. I don't want to, I hate to say it. I don't want to...

I hate to say it.

I don't want to cause bad blood

between us and European comrades,

but let's face some harsh truths.

European social democracy

was built...

Well, not necessarily the American worker.

Also, the slaves of the, you know, the third world that were integrated in America's global system.

But it's all the American Empire, and it's paying for all of it.

So I don't want to hear about this nonsense about IKEA and all this.

By the way, you know, I hate, I also don't want to say this, but I'm going to be real about some shit.

Fuck IKEA.

I fucking hate IKEA. Everything I've bought Fuck IKEA. I fucking hate IKEA.

Everything I've bought from IKEA causes me misery every time I look at it.

I just feel so miserable.

When I look at bullshit, I bought from IKEA.

I'm just like, fuck.

What an empty hollow like shell

of a piece of furniture that is

and the food at IKEA is

garbage by the way

ah please you know you're

please Sweden stop trying to fucking do French fries.

You don't know how to do it.

It's disgusting.

It tastes like cardboard.

All right.

Ikea, go to hell, frankly.

Frankly, all right?

I'm not against Nordic countries.

Those countries are cool when we're actually talking about like their countries, right?

Like their actual history, their actual culture, their actual ways and whatever.

That's fine.

I'm not against that.

I don't like this like Americanized, you know, post-war, like, nonsense.

That's that most Americans associate with Europe.

I just fucking hate that, all right?

Anyway, I'm not going to go on this rant because this is not just a rant about IKEA and Nordic countries.

I'm here to talk about, if you're confused, why I've decided that we need to nuke the DSAa and this is a long-term project by the way we're going to be first um infiltrating them well we're not going to infiltrate them we're going to um we're going to have people

outside i'm not even going to explain the plan anyway we're

we're preparing we're preparing for uh dispersing and dismantling that organization frankly i'm not

i'm not saying we want to compete with the dsSA because we don't we don't want to compete with the DSA

Compare the demographics of the DSA to the demographics of our party can we compete with them?

How many blue-collar workers are in the ds a compared to our party what what we're gonna we're gonna

recruit libtards that have trumped arrangement syndrome no we're not but i'm not thinking in terms of

trump i'm not thinking in terms of i'm not thinking in terms of Trump. I'm not thinking in terms of

I'm not thinking

in terms of woke tards

or any of that stuff. It's all, that's all

I'm thinking ahead. I'm really

thinking ahead. And you need to trust my judgment

on this.

Because I can't help but think about something.

And, you know, I want this stream to open up dialogue within our party with respect to this

analysis.

Because if you want to challenge this analysis and you're in the party again if you're in the party

you i want you to use your the appropriate channels of communication within our party

you know our journal whatever and maybe you you can disagree maybe you can have a different

analysis maybe you can agree with Maybe you can have a different analysis.

Maybe you can agree with me, but with a new perspective.

And I want to open up this discussion in general.

LeSenko with the 10.

Here we go.

Here we go.

Um... Here we go. But here's my analysis and here's why I think it's time to strike the DSA.

Now, first of all, I notice that Donald, and I want you to clip this and send it to him because I don't really have time to

deal with his nonsense.

But Donald Parkinson

and his Marxist unity group

think that this is like a dig at them.

You know, to the DSA's credit, they're actually a very large organization.

And Marxist Unity Group is very small, and we don't really care about them at all.

So Donald, if you were leading the DSA, maybe this would be different, but you're not leading

the DSA.

You have no control over the DSA.

Your influence, even within the DSA, is pretty negligible.

And when I say your influence, I'm talking about how the average DSA rank and file,

like to what extent are they listening to you?

They're not listening to you.

They don't give a shit about you.

So, frankly, I don't know if they need to be humbled as far as their prestige within the DSA is concerned, but it's not very significant.

And frankly, our differences with Donald and that group, we can sort out, we could sort those out polemically very easily. There's no need for us to take such a drastic action. I mean, if their strategy worked, we wouldn't have a problem with it. We have a problem with it because it evidently doesn't work.

If you don't know what Donald is doing, I don't want to make it personal,

what the, let's just call them MUG, if you don't know what they're doing,

what they're doing.

What they're basically doing is they are students of Lars Lee, a guy named Lars Lee,

who's a scholar on the Russian history of the Bolshevik Party more or less

and Lenin, you know, Lenin rediscovered.

It's a very big book. I have it here

actually.

It's not the worst book.

I don't agree with a lot of it, but it

is very informative. And then there's also

Mike McNair and this kind of idea of the new center, you know, that there needs to be a new

revolutionary center, away from the ultra-radicalism, sorry, the ultra-leftism, and away from the rightest opportunism of reformism.

And, you know, marginally, I kind of respect this idea that they have, that they want to return to some kind of like party building thing which is which is based

in the tradition of political realism actually that's what took hold in the second international

so i don't hate those I don't hate that perspective.

I just think it's fundamentally wrong.

And I'll explain why.

Donald or whoever from Mug, i get that you think that we are now in the stage of the second

international and uh you know early 1900s russian social democracy because to be honest there's no other faction of social democracy

that ever amounted to anything so Russian social democracy and that oh they're democratic

socialists so this is just like the social democrats in the late 19th century

in early 20th century uh there's one slight problem with that though which is that like

i don't know like a fucking century has passed of actual communist political traditions and states,

and state traditions and revolutionary strategies, and that's actually a century of that has passed.

And I understand, you know, he's a larper.

A lot of us are deep down, we want to be larpers, or we sympathize with it, or we were

larpers.

And in some ways, some of us are still larpers,

some of us like larping. But Donald is also a larper. He's larping as if he's living in

pre-revolutionary social democracy. And, oh, we're going to, oh, you have no idea, well, you know, the next stage next stage is going to be where the Bolsheviks, but we have to get there in stages.

And it's just fundamentally misguided.

I prefer basically like Red Army Ushanko Larp, because at least that will inspire some degree of, like,

militancy in you.

But no, the problem with that perspective is, well, it's stageism.

It's worse than stageism.

Stageism is a mistaken perspective about the nature of revolutionary strategy with respect to entire countries. But the weird form of stagism that MUG partakes in is a stageism where they somehow expect that, okay, we have our own beliefs about what a party should be. But we're going to suspend those beliefs because we're not at the right stage to form the fucking party in the

first place. So we have to be in the DSA

and

accelerate the DSA to the point where it's going to be advanced enough to be

a party. You know, it's like menshevism

was saying this about an entire country it was like okay you know we're not at the right stage

to seize power we're going to let the bourgeoisie seize power first, and then that will create the opportune conditions for us.

But no, they're saying, no, no, no, we need to help prop up the DSA, which will then allow us to take over the DSA.

So it's like, it's kind of silly in my eyes. You know, I don't take that seriously. I don't

find it a threat to the point where we need to declare war. I just don't take it seriously.

And the results speak for themselves. Our party's been around for three, four months. Look what we've accomplished. They've been around for years, all right? So that's all I want to say about Mug and Donald Parkinson's nonsense strategy within the DSA.

A DSA is not a political party in the first place.

No, when we're talking about the DSA, we're talking about the average member of the DSA, the Hassan Piker viewer, the unironic rose emoji. We're not talking about Donald

Parkinson with his advanced, you know, his advanced, uh, you know, Marxist background doing Tequia and

playing the

long game

but he's

only fooling

himself.

We're not

talking about

that.

We're talking

about the

average

DSA member

who is just

a fucking

liptard

at the wrong

time of the

month libtard

and I'm talking

about men

here. I don't want to be vulgar or offend

but frankly it's just a fucking

libtard. It's just the average

DSA person is a libtard

who is just super

angry and angry. it's just a seething lip-tart it's just a

libtard gone crazy lip-tards gone crazy right that's the average dsa member love it or hated

that's the average DSA member.

And it's kind of, I didn't put two together, but we tracked and located that a lot of the hostile posts on social media slandering our party.

The one I talked about yesterday, I got 6,000 likes, and it quote tweeted a video of me showcasing community service we were doing in Carbondale, and they fedjacketed us, a person from the DSA, and the 6,000 people who liked it, you know, we can guess how many of that are bots, but there is a demographic that is driving these attacks on our party and it's coming from the DSA those are the people that were slandering us from the very beginning it's DSA people

it always has been them we used to think it was CPUSA and Joe Sims activating bots.

But no, there is a mass base for social fascism, and it's the DSA.

And we have to think about the long-term implications of that fact in light of the new outcome, which I personally was not necessarily expecting that Trump won. I thought it was possible, but I was preparing more for a Kamala presidency because that would have been required much more immediate improvisation on our part.

The Trump victory buys us a little more time to think, and that's why i'm saying we can open some discussion on this

well in any case if kamala won we expected that we're going to just have to ignore the liberal

leftists completely and just go straight march on the far right right away because um they would have

won bigly from that victory if kamala won the far right would have completely um when i say the far

right i'm not talking about maga maga is not the far right talking about the far right, I'm not talking about Maga. Maga is not the far right. I'm talking about the neo-Nazis.

I mean, they would have been emboldened, not only emboldened, but the shock of a Kamala victory

would have definitely made

many people.

It would have strengthened their pipeline

a lot.

And that would not

have been good news for us.

Oh, the far right might have.

Not might of.

The neo-Nazis, they have fucking been completely defeated by Trump's victory.

Again, this is an objective analysis.

All this Hitler stuff and Hitler posting was a type of false consciousness that was generated on the basis of outrage in the face of Joe Biden, of the fact that basically i'll explain it uh the president

uh was senile so clearly he was not the one in control and the far right flourished in this

environment where it was just such a degree of demoralization, you know, hitting

young men especially, let's be frank about the demographic in question. And the far right,

I need people to understand something.

In terms of this analysis, I have.

Well, this kind of is heavy, theoretically.

But I want to break it down in the most easily digestible.

You guys ever, you know those like Agartha Joe Biden memes where like the sunwheel is behind Joe Biden?

That is actually like a real thing.

Joe Biden's victory in 2020 really did cement and strengthen the real neo-Nazis.

The real, like, you know, when I say the neo-Nazis, I mean the neo-Nazi international, so to speak.

The one that stretches from the New zealand shooter to ukraine to europe and here the joe biden sun andrand yeah that one that's the real neo-nots those neo-nazis that criminal

element the whatever like those that is a force of nihilism.

And the victory of the Democratic Party in 2020 was a victory of nihilism.

And I don't know how to explain this in a properly nuanced way.

It's extremely theoretical.

It's extremely in a way abstract.

And I know most people don't have the patience for it, but please bear with me.

So... so if you want to think about the conflict between trump and the democratic party what you really have is a conflict between a politics that's based in a specific kind of like determination, right, which is, you know, Trump calls it, you know, make America great again. Let's focus inward. Let's focus on the content of America. And so it's kind of, it has this substance to it, that endows it with at least the appearance of a human quality and the appearance of a meaningfulness, that at least there's this illusion that some kind of meaningful goal is animating the entire machinery of politics and the state. And Trump, you know, he has a plan, so to speak. And that places Trump in proximity with the kind of global authoritarianism trend, if you want to speak lib tardees, right?

What is a pop filter? I don't know what the fuck that is.

Sleeper Cell, can you please?

What is a pop filter?

Now I'm like, what is going on?

Nobody knows.

Even you don't know.

It's the circle thing in front of mics.

Okay, it's my mic.

All right, well, I don't care about that.

Anyway, that's what places him in proximity to that.

And again, we could talk about, oh, no, he's a sellout. That's what places him in proximity to that. And again, we could talk about, oh, no, he's a sellout.

That's, we know.

I mean, we know. But still, there's some kind of conflict, at least the appearance of one.

And that's enough for the purposes of this explanation of the far-rights relationship

to the Democratic Party. But, so this idea of like focusing on America specifically and that coming at the expense, again, superficially,

at the expense of the... A lot of this is so abstractly. We're talking about kind of something so

virtual, right?

We're not talking about policies. We're talking about a specific relationship to accredited and legitimated institutions

as the authority, right?

The problem that

the Democrats have with Trump

is the alternative facts.

It's his way, it's the perception

that he delegitimizes the

credibility of expert rule, Fauci and whatever.

And it's like, that is at the heart of a deep conflict, you know.

And we can go into the analysis more.

But in good faith, I think most people know what I'm talking about there.

But when Biden won, that was a victory of the kind of Western liberal universalism,

which is, you know, the open society. It's an open-endedness, which is necessarily a nothingness. It's an indeterminate outcome. That is the victory of the purity of, you know, democracy, unblemished by this hyper-partisan, hyper-particular and hyper, you know, extremely determined, popular voice.

I mean, Trump is a populist, right?

Whereas Biden kind of represented the impersonal rule of a, the Leviathan, to speak right um um and that was so um evident from the fact that Biden was senile. He wasn't even a personality. Trump is a personality.

Trump is actually like a living, breathing person. He's funny. He's got a personality. He has character.

And that gives politics a sense of warmness and familiarity, right? But Biden is what? You guys remember the memes of Biden with glowing red eyes? Biden represents the impersonal nothingness, the nihil of the state, right?

He represents this impersonal cruelty of Hobbes' Leviathan.

You know, this is the pure data, science pure truth of the experts which is completely indifferent and alienated from any kind of human reality and that is what the democrats kind of

represent in the information age they represent a politics that is what the democrats kind of represent in the information age they represent a politics

that is radically inhuman and i'll i'll get to more details about that in a second it's a radically

inhuman politics and i'm not saying that means they're evil, although this is why we get evil vibes from them.

It's not personal, actually.

It's just because this is the nature of changes in the relations and forces of production.

And the Democrats have come to reflect that more purely than anyone else.

Of course, the Republicans are just as inhuman in practice.

This is not a moral judgment.

This is not a normative judgment.

But I'm saying that democratic politics has become

technocratic politics.

It has become

it has become very much

like a robotic

for a reason.

And that's just because

in their eyes,

in the eyes of democratic ideologists,

and they don't even think that they have an ideology,

they are just giving expression

to the cruel and impersonal truth

of reality in their political existence.

And for them, truth is excised of a human element.

It's pure data.

It's pure, you know, whatever.

And then on the other hand, it seems like Democrats are possessed by this, like, you know, politics that's based on

extreme emotions, and that's where all the woke stuff and the social justice or whatever stuff

seems to come from. But it's really the tension between those two things that defines what the

Democrats are and what

libitards are. It's, there obviously is some kind of theological basis to this in the American

Protestant tradition, which I'm not going to go into. But more or less, it's the simultaneous, you know, coincidence of a world of total depravity on the one hand that cannot be trusted, that's, you know, by itself, completely blind and indifferent to us.

And on the other hand, the radical anxiety that this catalyzes in us to be

radically empathetic and do everything we can to take care of people. Because at the end of the day,

Song, appreciate you. Because at the end of the day day although we have a very grim view about the

objective reality that actually inspires us if you're a democrat them to be radically good at the

subjective level.

And that is kind of the source of the paradox.

But it's also why there is a real proximity between the Democratic Party and fascism.

It's about the way in which they view objective reality,

not the performative subjective

response they have to that, which makes it seem

like they're too emotional and they're too humane and they're too, like, good or whatever, right?

But that is just a reaction to the very dark and nihilistic outlook they have with respect to objective reality, right?

Once, if you're like following along and this kind of makes sense, because I'm really trying

to dumb it down the best way I can.

Anyway, I know a lot of neo-Nazis were really happy when Joe Biden won, because it really was a victory of this kind of metaphysical outlook

of

of neilism

right that this is a world of total depravity

the world of Hobbes's

metaphysics of his

classical political theory, that objective reality is completely devoid of meaning,

and that the only meaningfulness of objective reality is an extent of our kind of subjective um our vacuum sealed subjective activity and for neo nazis

that's actually how they look at the world. The world, they'll say, is full of

a bunch of sub-humans, you know, whatever, they say the N-word, the black and brown hordes, you know,

and then they'll simultaneously attempt to articulate humanity in the racial solidarity because, in their view, the white race needs to, it's so delicate and it's so pure, it needs to kind of protect itself from the cruelty and the

evil of objective reality right so it's a similar kind of thing and they have obviously the

hyper darwinist view and they trust the science and they even apply it when it comes to race and IQ and they it's it's really um

dr fouchy is really uh joseph mingle or something this this view of you just need to trust the impersonal science well they have the same outlook right

name one person with this worldview richard spencer uh jared taylor uh the whole bap crowd uh and

the azov battalion and to further, the people in the order of Nine Angels,

the Nazis in Ukraine, the shooter in New Zealand, the various neo-Nazi groups in the United States, you know, the blood tribe and the Patriot Front, they have this outlook.

Isn't BAP right-wing pro-Trump?

Yeah, but, well, BAP is not really a, to be fair, he's not really like,

exactly what I'm talking about here, but he does share a lot of the qualities I'm talking

about with respect to the view of objective reality. But obviously he's

articulating it in a different way. And that's not to say neo-Nazis support the Democrats

exclusively. Obviously, some of them were very happy about Trump, but I'm talking about deep down, you know, there was something very empowering about Biden's victory for them.

And that was proven in the fact that they have never been more powerful

than under Biden's administration. And they were incredibly convincing and persuasive to people

because in the rain

put it this way

the reign of the

Democrats is kind of like a nihilistic

realism

but the reign of

Trump

opens up

like, I don't want to be cringe, but it's almost

kind of like magical. It's like a magical

realism, right? It's like

it's introducing a kind of surrealistic

dimension to the political

where the scientists and the people in Lab, they are completely powerless to explain or understand any of it.

So that's why they do much worse in these circumstances.

Um, in any case, how did I get here

well yeah I was talking about why the far right was in power

so if Kamala won that would have been accelerated to like a huge degree

and Richard Spencer knew that which is why he supported

Kamala Harris and the Democrats.

He, of course, he knew it.

He himself had a lot of experience in terms of understanding how the far right grows.

Why do I call the DSA social fascist?

I'll explain.

Don't worry, I'm going to get to that.

There's a lot of things I've sheled.

Hopefully I remember all of them.

So if Kamala won, that would be our primary

strategy is we

have to deal

with that

and it's a

completely

different

strategy actually

but

now that

Trump has won

what we can anticipate

is going to happen

is a little different

by the way

a lot of people

are asking me about like

oh what about

Trump

his cabinet picks

and I'm like you know it's kind of frustrating because if I for two years have been saying that I don't trust Trump at all, and he probably is completely compromised, and yeah, he's going to, he's, he already sold out.

I mean, why is it that when we say something for example me and

jackson when we say something we say yeah if trump's elected it's only because they

allowed him to get elected, right?

And then we get proven correct, and people are so shocked by it that they want to come and ask.

I'm not talking about you guys. I'm talking about, for example, the social fascists that are now slandering us,

claiming that we were shocked by Trump's cabinet picks.

We're not shocked by them.

If they're referring to Jackson's tweets,

Jackson isn't shocked.

I talk to Jackson almost every day.

Jackson is the one who predicted this would happen.

So why did Jackson waste time trying to use his platform to promote the idea of other people getting picked?

Well, maybe you just don't know about everything going on behind the scenes in terms of what the outcome of this, these kind of posts actually has.

Maybe, maybe as a matter of fact, there's a more long-term plan as far as building certain bridges.

I'm not even going to, I'm not even going to go there.

In any case, no, no one had any illusions that that would actually happen.

But it does create the context for an opposition to Trump.

And that's why when Jackson's tweeting about how Trump betrayed his...

He's not talking to you, and he's not talking to me.

He talks to me on the phone.

He's talking to Trump's base.

He's communicating to Trump's base.

Look at what is happening in real time. When Kyle Idiot

Kulinski is gloating that, oh, how could you be surprised by what Trump did, given what he did in

2016? I mean, we're not surprised, but his base is certainly surprised by it,

and his base is going to look for answers. Are they going to look for answers in a guy that's

just mocking them and laughing at them? No. They're going to look for answers in people

who can meaningfully explain what's going on. And that's what Jackson is doing. So no one's

shocked by anything. It's not news. We knew this would happen. We were never even happy or optimistic about Trump. We were happy about the defeat of the Democratic Party. And those are two very different things. Those are two very different things. And I'll tell you the difference. The difference is we have bought some temporary chaos because that's what the Republican Party is.

It's a circus and always has been.

But the Democratic Party is such a strong and powerful machine, especially for disarming the left. And so that loss that they suffered was

incredibly good for us. In any case, I want to get back to the DSA thing.

But I'm appraising the situation now, and I see the writing on the wall.

The far right is fundamentally disarmed by Trump's election.

So I don't see far-right paramilitary groups

gaining any traction

anytime soon.

I think the far right

is extremely

confused, shocked

and disoriented.

And I don't think the far right is going to be able to articulate independent far right

politics in the Trump era. I don't think so. I think one of the reasons the far right were able to be as powerful as they were,

like America First, by the way, in 2016, is because they had foot soldiers

which the media

and you know

leftist activists portrayed as Trump's foot soldiers

as if Trump is Mussolini

and these are his black shirts

so that illusion which was not true, by the way, gave them a lot of prominence and

prestige and power. But this time around, that illusion will never, uh, stand. Trump doesn't have like a fascist black shirt base that's going to go and beat people up for him in cities with sticks or

whatever. Like it's not going to happen.

There aren't going to be

any Maga black shirts.

It's nonsense.

Especially this time

around.

Especially this time around especially this time around

fascists in the police force

and ice are happy about Trump's victory

well

what do you mean by

fascists though? Think about that what do you mean

by fascists? Because are they the same fascists though think about that what do you mean by fascists because are they the same

fascists that were under obama okay sure but again he doesn't have he doesn't have a mass

organization i feel like you guys can get where i'm getting at here. He doesn't have like a mass

organization that is going to be able to enforce politics on the street and in real life.

You see, people don't under, they keep making the same mistake, the same mistake over and over again, right?

And it's very simple.

Trump is not like some Mussolini fascist threat.

He's just a normal American politician. He's not going to deploy

black shirts across America to enforce his will. He's not going to implement some radical

agenda that is discontinuous with the plan of the regime that has been going on for

decades. It's a continuation of the same plan. And there's going to be smooth continuity. He's not going to resort to you know oh trump is no he's not going to do anything that

kamala wasn't going to do there's nothing going to be surprising with respect to that

if there's anything drastic that happens under Trump, it was going to

happen no matter who was president. Because as you should have learned from the four years of

Joe Biden, the president isn't actually the ruler of our country. If there's things you guys should clip, it's really this.

The president doesn't rule our country.

Joe Biden was senile for four years.

He had dementia.

He was not cognitively in a state of mind where he was even capable of communicating to journalists, let alone making major decisions of governance and administration.

So if you can have someone who has dementia be the president of the United States for four years,

it's pretty solid proof that the president is not running the show.

And that should have been everyone's takeaway after Trump's election in 2016.

Trump didn't betray Maga because he's a bad guy.

He betrayed Maga because everyone found out that the president doesn't actually matter.

His decisions don't actually matter.

There is a machine. There is a regime.

And it's going to go in the direction it's going to go in because it's not controlled by the president.

It's controlled by an oligarchical, global capitalist class.

And that's who controls it, and that's who runs it.

And that's who makes all the decisions before you ever even hear that they're even being considered.

So you need to understand that.'s square one of opposing the regime in the

trump era stop making it about trump trump is not special one of the biggest mistakes i saw after

2016 is people...

Oh, Trump's a dictator.

Trump's a...

You know, you're eipalizing it.

Trump is not your dad, all right?

If Trump was a dictator, that wouldn't even be a bad thing necessarily.

He'd be like Putin or something. That not what he is all right he's just a person he's just a celebrity and he's funny i mean that's it he doesn't actually rule the state, though. He doesn't rule the state.

So anyone who tries to oppose the regime in the next four years,

Oh, Cheeto Mussolini, I'm going to make effigies of Trump as an orange man and mock the orange man. It's like, you're an idiot. It doesn't matter. Mocking, it's stupid. You're not opposing the regime by doing that. You're just, you know

you're just siding with a faction of the regime

the resistance

it's nonsense

it's total nonsense

he doesn't have any power

he's not worth being angry at or hating or opposing because you can't oppose the president.

It's nonsense.

You can oppose the regime.

You can oppose the entire regime, though.

So I want to get that out of the way but in any case look um this war we're going to be waging against

the dsa is not personal it's not based in the very personal i'll be frank personal, personal hatred I have for DSA, which I do.

I do hate them on a personal level, and I don't like admitting that because hatred is not a good feeling to have.

But I hate their corruption.

I hate how their corruption. I just see them as the epitome of corruption. I hate how...

They're corruption.

I just see them as the epitome of corruption.

I hate their corruption because if you ask an average DSA person, like, don't you know who Michael Harrington was and what the DSA actually was founded to be?

They'll kind of scoff at it and be like,

uh-huh,

but we run it now.

We don't care about that.

So many of us are reading Mao.

And it just reminds me of like a spoiled brat daughter who's like using all of her dad's money, her billionaire dad's money, but is like simultaneously pretending to be like a radical.

I get to use daddy's money however I want.

I just find it corrupt.

It's fucking corruption. If you hate your dad so fucking much,

then stop taking his money.

If you don't like democratic socialism and Michael Harrington,

then form a different fucking organization

and form a different fucking party.

What, you're just there because everyone

else is? This is

what I'm trying to get to.

Who is this everyone else?

That's really the object of my concern here. Who is the everyone else? Who is the everyone else that's really the object of my concern here who is the

everyone else that makes the dsa popular that makes the dsa something that has a relative

degree of plausible deniability from the actual Democratic Party.

Who are its demographic?

What makes it a mass organization?

Well, it doesn't matter what Donald wants to do.

It doesn't matter what all these factions want to do.

Here's the truth.

The DSA is a compatible organization with the hegemony, all of the NGOs, all of the academic institutions, all of the institutionalized CIA-created civil society. The DSA swims in this reality like fish in water. Who do they recruit from? Do they recruit from ordinary regular working people? Do they recruit from do they recruit from ordinary regular working people do they recruit from

young people just no they recruit from young people that are being declassed young people who are

disappointed by their inability for their careers to, you know, to develop in the way they wanted it to.

That's their demographic. Their demographic, their mass base is in the same mass base that historically and traditionally

was the mass base of fascism. A downwardly mobile petty bourgeoisie.

And petty bourgeoisie, we're talking about, we're not talking about small business owners.

The petty bourgeoisie referred to the professional class, always, by the way. And they're being lumpinized.

I'm a Marxist.

I don't think in terms of emotions or ideology necessarily.

But isn't there a degree of affinity between the ideology being cooked up by a lot of neo-Nazis and this mass base?

What if they started talking to each other?

What if a dialogue, any kind of dialogue opened up between the actual Hitlerites and the

DSA? We'd be in trouble. We'd be in trouble as the ACP. Because we're not big enough.

We don't have enough of a base in the actual American working class yet to withstand that.

And right now, again, we've been ignoring the DSA,

but every time we go viral doing anything,

garnering attention among the American working class,

they have to lie and slander about us,

and it goes viral. They make it go viral.

They are capable of concentrating so much

negative attention toward us. And again, it's the same strategy. I know this because they use that

same strategy against me personally in late 2021 and early 2022 all those people i was beefing with

and fighting with it wasn't just bread tube it was the ds a that's who it was so um they're doing that they're trying to do that to our party now they're trying to label us

with all these bad labels they try to fed jacket us they tried to call us a crypto scam every

single time consistently it was the DSA.

And who was stifling our efforts to take over CPSA?

What, the mass rank and file of CPSA?

No, it was the DSA.

It was the DSA who were rightfully threatened by this initiative we had of reforming the

CPUSA because the ideology of DSA is corruption. It's the same thing that exists in the democratic party i want to

communicate this very clearly the corruption in question is the following my politics in practice

are this milk toast Lip-Tard nonsense

AOC, I'm going to vote for Kamala, whatever.

But I keep up the red specter

of extreme far-left

whatever Marxism

as like a, oh, we could always go more left.

Punished Bernie.

We could always go more left.

But they'll never go that left.

They just kind of keep it as a false and illusory source of leverage.

So the reason a lot of red libs, you see,'re called, we call them red libs, they're not actually

Marxist-Leninists when they're sharing pro-Stalin memes.

They're not actual principled Stalinists.

They're using these memes, and that's all they are, as an illusory form of leverage, the boogeyman of

communism, to give substance to their otherwise weak and ineffectual liberal politics.

And the Democrats do the same. They did the same with Bernie. That's what Bernie Sanders

serves the function of in the Democratic Party. But within the DSA, the idea is not that they're ever going to become MLs or communists.

The idea is that, oh, well, we're reading it.

And, oh, like, they kind of perversely enjoy the contradiction of being in a democratic socialist organization while simultaneously flirting, and

that's the best way I could describe it, flirting with these extremely radical ideas. And keeping those

ideas at a distance while simultaneously flirting with them is the source of gratification for them.

It's a virtual projection of a power that they don't have, but that they need to feel like they have.

They need to feel like they can project the power of Stalin and the Soviet Union and Marxism and China and whatever, right?

This is exactly, I'm describing Hassan Pike or two, by the way.

But they can never actually be that, but they need it to be this kind of perfect like platonic idea that they are just the imperfect shadow of and they need to maintain that purity like it always needs to be something so pure that it doesn't exist,

right? Which should not come as a, this general psychopathology or symptom, uh, is best epitomized

by the other perspective in the DSA, which is that real communism has never been tried, and those were all corruptions of real communism, and the real thing is super pure, and it's too pure to ever exist.

Well, they have, a lot of times they do the same thing,

except when it comes to actual communist states,

where they're like, yeah, it's just over there in, like, history,

or, like, over there in China, or, like, it's totally, like, far.

So, therefore, it's perfect. It's a platonic idea. But never actually be a

communist with the capital C. That's ridiculous. Never actually be a Marxist-Leninist, unironically.

That's ridiculous. So like that's ridiculous.

So, like, that's their general psychopathology and symptom.

And I hate it.

I do hate it.

I have a really violent hatred toward it.

I'm not going to lie.

When I say violent hatred, I just mean intense hatred.

Because I find it so fundamentally fucking corrupt and disgusting. And it doesn't belong in America, which is supposed to be a country founded on principles of honest, honest work, honesty, simplicity.

These are real American virtues. They have brought some disgusting, filthy European corruption that I fucking hate.

I hate it.

I really passionately hate it. It burns inside of me how much I fucking hate them and they're disgusting disgusting position of

falsehood and hypocrisy

if you're going to be talking

about communism be a

communist

actually fucking be one if you're good a communist. Actually

fucking be one.

If you're going to praise Stalin,

be like Stalin.

Don't keep it as

a distance as some illusory

form of leverage that you use

and your squabbles with fellow Democrats that are

slightly to the right of you.

Fucking be it or don't be it.

But this disgusting and unprincipled position that they have. I just fucking

hate it. It's not about purity. It's not about

being pure. None of us are pure.

But we're honest about what we

are. We're communists. We're Marxist

Leninists. What

that actually amounts to, of course, needs to compromise with, not even compromise,

it needs to reflect reality itself.

But Marxism has always been based in realism.

I don't like ideological hypocrisy. It's like we are communists, so we're in a communist

party. Oh, but we're not ready for communism. Then you're not fucking ready to call yourself a communist.

You're either a communist or you're not.

You're either a Marxist or you're not.

Stop saying the world isn't ready for something that you claim is true.

If you don't think the world is ready for it,

then you're not ready for it either because you're also part of the world,

you fucking moron.

I hate this disgusting and you know what I hate is because they

indulge in the subversion of it

like like again the spoiled brat

daughter who hates her dad

but is like spending all his money and

like rebelling against her father

they've created DSA is this

like oh we don't take Michael

Harrington seriously

his fuck you though

what you're just you're like a

spoiled brat that's like rebelling against her fight. Well, if you, if you're about it, then be about it. If you're about it, then be about it. I fucking hate corruption. I hate corruption. I hate corruption. And the corruption that I'm talking about here actually reflects their class position. Because this is the same corruption that defines the existence of the professional managerials. It's corruption.

It's pure corruption.

It's literally what I told you, that psychopathology, that's how they are to their parents. They hate their parents, but they rely on their parents.

You know, they hate the system, but they fucking rely on the system. And when I say the system,

we're not talking about just having an iPhone. I'm talking about being a career climbing parasite within the imperialist

hegemony. I'm talking about not willing to actually stand on your beliefs in public with your

face saying Stalin is good because it's going

to compromise your prospects

of being a, the manager

of the Interpretive Dance Corporation

at Disney or something.

That's what I'm fucking talking about.

And yeah, we're so subversive.

These DSA people

had become showrunners

on HBO

and writers on HBO.

You know,

I watched

The Last of Us

and I saw like

the lady

and the,

they're like,

yeah,

we're communists.

We live in a commune.

Aztec, appreciate you, brother.

And it's like, you know that was a DSA writer.

I saw the trailer for the Saints role game

and they're like, yeah, we're anti-capitalist.

And I'm like, yeah, I know you're in the DSA.

And you think you're like doing

tequila and you're like yeah we're still working for the corporation but we're

yeah yeah fuck this corruption I hate it you understand my hatred now do you guys get it

like I fucking hate corruption so much.

I really hate it.

I really fucking hate it.

You are a prostitute.

I don't know what else to say. You're a prostit. In the same way that a prostitute has the freedom and autonomy to mock their clients and laugh at them in private, that's what you're doing. That's what you're doing to the imperialist degemony and to the Democratic Socialist organization itself.

But you're not free.

You are what you do.

Not how you subject.

This is why I hate dsa because you are what you do you're not how you subjectively interpret what you do you are what you do you're not your subjective experience you are what you do. You're not your subjective experience.

You are what you do.

If you're in the DSA, you are in a CIA anti-communist organization.

That you subjectively interpret your presence in that organization as somehow, no, it's going to be, we just need more stages and then it's going to become Mao.

That's your subjective interpretation, right?

But that's not actually what you are. You're not your subjective. A prostitute, if a, I don't want to be vulgar.

How do I explain this?

I'll do the opposite thing.

If you're a man having sex with a 700-pound woman,

but you're envisioning her as like Nicki Minaj?

I don't know, that's so specific. Why Nikki Minaj?

She's kind of...

Ice spice also kind of got a little

too skinny. What's a good example?

If you're a man having sex with a

900 pound woman

but you are imagining

her as

who's that woman

from Wild Wild West?

Selma Hayek.

You're imagining her as Selma Hayek at her peak.

That may be your subjective fantasy,

but you are having sexual intercourse with a 900-pound woman.

So that, and the reverse, the reverse as well.

For both, you know, you can pretend.

This is why, you know what's disgusting is that the DSA, you know how they promote sex work?

That's literally their take.

It's like we're connecting so many dots, aren't we? They're like, yeah, sex workers are being, are radically autonomous because they are allowed to subjectively have so much freedom to define their experiences. But their experience is, in my opinion,

their experience is complete degradation. Their experience is complete dehumanization that's what their experience

is you can subjectively respond to that experience however you want why don't you just be

fucking honest and sober about what it actually is?

And that is the metaphor I have for the DSA as an organization.

I'm just disgusted about the corruption.

Do you guys understand what I mean about corruption?

Corruption?

I'm not sitting here grandstanding,

pretending I'm such a pure person.

But I am not a sniveling, fucking snickering, you know, rat that's indulging in this false sense of subversion.

And we're being naughty and we're not leaving,

uh-huh, we're doing it.

It's like, no, you know, we're doing it it's like no

you know we're very imperfect

of course I'm an imperfect human being

but it's like I try my best

I'm trying my best

to be a chairman for this party

I'm trying my best to do what's right

for the Communist Party

I'm trying to my best to do what's right for the Communist Party.

I'm trying to my best to do what's right for the cause of Marxism, for the cause of communism.

I really do believe in this.

And I would take a bullet for Lenin.

I mean that.

I know Lenin is gone from 100 years ago.

But I would take

a bullet for his cause.

If Lenin was resurrected

and gave me the order

to carry out any gave me the order to

carry out any

any mission

I would do it

if Lenin told me

500 million people must go

there's already 5,000 500 million people must go.

There's already 500 million less people.

Go, I mean, as in like go to the bowling alley, of course but uh but but but this is my belief this is my sincere belief

well of course we're reality is not reducible to our beliefs i understand that But we should be realistic and honest about the extent to which we are capable of appraising reality.

And that is what the DSA doesn't have.

There's no honesty.

There's no realism. There's no realism. It's just corruption and corruption.

Corruption after corruption. In any case, that is part one, right?

Now,

we'll go back to the Democratic Party, because that's a really interesting discussion to talk about, Democrats versus Maga.

But why am I worried about DSA now?

I'm not worried that DSA is going to become like a left-wing, you know, powerful left-wing radical organization.

I'm worried that it alone seems to be to have provided the skeleton and basis for a fascist movement in this country. Yeah, I sound crazy. I don't care. Marxism is not based in things making sense on the political spectrum for ideology.

I'm sorry.

Marxism is about the class basis of different kinds of phenomena.

And the way I can see it right now is that the DSA is primed to take the lion's share of organizing the lumpin and the declass PMC before we have a workers movement.

And so I don't want to compete with the DSA and fill my ranks with potential DSA recruits.

I actually think we need to make it a mission of ours within the next four years at least

to do the best we can to disperse, just break them as an organization, disperse them.

The lumpinized PMC should not have an organ, an organization.

We should deprive them of that power within the class struggle.

Because that organ very easily becomes an organ of fascism and the repression and suppression of workers' movements.

Now, for some of you saying that, you know, someone said, well, some DSA people came and they helped with my trade union and so on.

Well, it's very cold and cruel that I'm thinking in this way, but I'm not

thinking in terms of individuals, sir. I'm thinking in terms of demographics. The class basis of the DSA is the same class basis as fascism. The mass base, I should rather say. The reasoning, the reason people join DSA is not to go down to the working classes, because that requires a radical selflessness where you sacrifice your own immediate interests for the sake of reaching others.

Something also I'm proud of when it comes to the ACP is that the DSA is self-indulgent.

It's very self-fulfilling. It's very, like, self-affirming, right? They even

redefine the meaning of working class so that office workers are fucking workers now. Anyway,

I'm sure Hassan reines it so that streamers are workers too.

Right?

So it's very, there's no notion of like selflessness, communist militancy, selflessness and stuff.

But you know, something I'm proud of of the ACP is

we are

80% blue collar workers

because working class

people who work on a job site with manually by the way with their hands

they're already collectivistic because why because in a fucking factory or in a construction site or anywhere else, you have to work as a team.

Doesn't matter what your fucking feelings are. Doesn't matter how you feel.

Doesn't matter what your subjective interpretation is,

doesn't matter whatever the fuck we're talking about,

you need to get the job done,

and the criterion that determines whether the job is done or not

is objective and rooted in natural laws.

Like, we got to fucking lay the foundation for this house.

It's going to get done or it's not going to get done.

And we have to work together to do it.

Right?

So if you're an actual worker, you don't need me to instill collectivism in you. You

probably already have it. Um... um um you know

but it's not the same

um

as it was a hundred years ago

in Lenin's time

uh

working class people could not be the party cadre.

By and large, it was an exception.

Lennon wrote about it.

He says largely the bourgeois intelligentsia is going to have to be the base, the intelligentsia, for party membership, you know, the party rank and file.

Lennon was against opening it up

to working masses.

Because you had to be extremely educated

and trained and dedicated.

For Lennon, it was very simple.

Workers don't have time.

They don't have time.

So how can they be class-conscious fighters of the proletariat when they don't have time?

You know, that disconnect was always a problem in communist parties.

Now, there's wisdom to that disconnect. The wisdom is the simple fact that, you know, class, uh, being a class conscious fighter for the proletariat and the proletarian class position is not a personal position.

So that's wisdom there.

You know, I mean, I am personally not a blue-collar worker.

But to the extent that I can properly represent blue collar workers, I represent their position.

So that's true for Marx and Lenin and so on.

But the 21st century is different, and this is why it's kind of beautiful.

Workers do have the time now, and they have access to the information that they need to become educated.

And that's because of technology technology has undercut and undermined glasses wearers and bureaucrats that's the fucking beauty of technology

now workers

can be cadre

now workers

can be advanced communists

workers don't need

to listen to academics

not a digger Workers don't need to listen to academics.

Not a dig at Carlos, by the way. He's great.

But as an institutional phenomena, workers do not need to listen to people that came from bourgeois institutions because of technology, because of technology, because of the decentralization of information.

And that is so fucking pot. The biggest friend of the worker is technology. People talk about automation,

but the negative effects of automation with respect to labor,

there's tried and tested experience.

But the main automation

that's being

caused by the age of AI

are the class enemies

of the proletariat. You know,

writers and TV show

script writers and

digital artists

and that is a friend of the world.

Now workers have the time to be $500 million budget Hollywood film directors in five years.

Your average worker at a factory is going to be able to produce

Transformers films using AI technology. And that's fucking beautiful. That workers now have the

ability to partake in the production of culture and

information and they never

were before. And yeah,

it makes them less dependent on the experts.

Artisans are being destroyed.

Worse, you know, because these artisans at least,

maybe they're weaving with their hands or something.

These are people sitting on a desk at HR departments

just enforcing their will.

Even video games are going to be made by AI.

Give it about 10, 20 years.

Maybe less.

Video games will be made by AI.

And guys,

think about this for a second. Where does

DSA stand with respect to this phenomenon, which is just going to keep accelerating?

DSA seems really upset about AI.

And we have a word for that in Marxism.

It's called reactionary.

The DSA hasn't done enough yet to justify a war, all right?

But think about where I'm coming from can you see the writing on the wall of where this is

going to lead to like this is a preemptive action that I'm suggesting we take kill Hitler

before Hitler jumps we take. Kill Hitler before

Hitler

jumps onto the scene. It's like

Baby Hitler. DSA

is Baby Hitler. Are you going to kill

baby Hitler or let them live?

Not kill literally, but

metaphoricallyically of course

like I see the writing on the wall

I see that the primary source

of opposition to the ACP

the demographic source is being organized by the DSA

and we should disperse and

crush their organization

before it mutates in ways that

will be much more or worse

for us and we should do

this simultaneously while we strengthen

our own ranks and draw from the working classes, which is what we're doing.

And toward that end, by the way, a lot needs to be done for us to build institutions, right?

We can't recruit from universities.

We can't recruit from, you know, Amnesty International or whatever.

But like, you know where we can recruit guys?

We can recruit from community colleges.

We can recruit from trade schools. We can recruit in middle America from less, you know, trendy and less popular, but places that are sources of congregation

for our demographic base, a class base.

And typically a party doesn't recruit the class, the proletarian class.

But remember my theory of the Mecca Proletariat, where today's Proletariat has a mech.

The mech represents the decentralization of technology and the means of production the tools that proletarians have that compound their labor, right?

That was the idea.

So we're living in a new era where, yeah, we can recruit young welders and tradesmen and people like that.

They would make fine additions to our party because they have

free time to be in our party

they lack

social connections

a lot of the time they're very isolated

and

our people are out there guys

I feel like a lot of these guys are going home

and they're playing video games

and they're lonely and they're

just by themselves and they're isolated and uh you know, they're just by themselves and they're isolated.

And, you know, our people are out there and we got to reach them.

And we need to do it fast because a war is coming, comrades, a war is coming.

And we're going to need the might of the sleeping giant that is the working class to confront this fascist enemy.

Now, how does all this relate to the, how does this all relate to the um to trump well not a lot i don't think trump is going to be

musilini i think he's going to be biden biden was a corpse who was president i think trump will be a corpse who was president. I think Trump will be a corpse who's president. I think Trump's weakness will become very evident throughout his administration. People are just going to see he's not in control. And why do I know this for a fact?

Because I know this for a fact because later in

Trump's

administration

QAnon created

the delusion

to trust the

plan

that Trump

had a secret

plan and that

the reason he

was betraying

Mago is

because it was

all 40 Chess

I don't think that delusion is going to was betraying Mago is because it was all 40 Chess.

I don't think that delusion is going to survive another four years.

I think people are going to realize Trump

is just like Biden.

He's not really in control

at all.

And, you know, that's just the fact of the matter.

So this thing I wanted to say about Democrats, by the way, how they're robotic.

Didn't you find it intriguing when you watch Democratic Party campaign ads, local and national?

The recurring theme you'll notice is that they look like skin walkers trying to replicate Maga.

And it came off so like fake and inauthentic where they're like,

my name is Bob Hillman and we want a tough border.

They would say shit like that and it's like, clearly this is coming from a laboratory of experts who were scanning the data, scanning the data.

Okay, so we've scanned the data.

And, okay, to win a lot of Trump's MAGA base, a lot of the reason Trump is popular is because of the immigration issue.

So we need to change our...

Like, it was so robotic.

That's what I'm trying to say.

It was robotic.

It was robotic.

It was uncanny.

It was like aliens from outer space trying to be human.

The famous Mark Zuckerberg is a robot or a reptile meme.

Like that is the Democratic Party.

That is what they are.

Fundamentally, that is what they are.

Kamala Harris is a robot.

That is not her real personality.

Everything she has, it's all, like, staged, you know?

And that is, but why are the Democrats like that?

Because they represent this, like, total technocracy, like, expert rule kind of subjectivism, the purity of subjectivism, like New Deal social engineering, gone wrong, right? And that's the Democratic Party, but there's an uncanny.

See, the Democratic Party is radically dehumanizing.

They're radically anti-humanistic, right?

And that really resonates with neo-nazism and fascism put it this way the difference

between a democrat and a fascist is that democrats pretend to have a heart and be empathetic.

But both Democrats and fascists agree about the same reality.

They share the same metaphysical outlook.

They just disagree in terms of how to respond to it. They both believe in the force

from Star Wars, but they just have different philosophies about, but they believe in the same reality.

Like, Democrats are cynics. They believe in race realism they just think that it's hurtful um democrats

believe that you know slavs are the inferior race and they believe

in all of that, but they just think that it's hurtful

and it's mean, and they want to

be loving and nice

so they avoid it.

But they do believe it.

They believe in the same things neo-Nazis

believe.

And it's like the reason the social fascists, you know, the liberal leftists, the reason they constantly are putting swastikas on us.

Why are you putting swastikas on us, why are you putting swastikas on us?

You know, the swastika is a really like naked, ugly, like, pornographic.

Why are you throwing swastikas on us?

Swastikas are disgusting. They inspire

revulsion and shock

in normal people.

Why are you throwing that on us so much?

Because they're projecting.

Because something in them wants

reality to be the swastika. Like they agree with

neo-Nazis about Nazism representing the truth. They just don't like the truth subjectively.

And so they, that's their anti-fascism it's not a disagreement as it pertains to

objective reality they believe so strongly that nazism is true that when has al-dein comes forward and just starts telling the naked truth,

they interpret that to mean an endorsement of Nazism because they deep down believe that Nazis are telling the truth.

They think that they just have a filter because of their subjective morality,

but ultimately the reality that they believe in is the same one Nazis believe in. So when you

insist upon being truthful and objective and authentic, they accuse you of being a Nazi.

Why are they saying Trump is Hitler?

Trump is Hitler?

Did that ever come from Maga?

No, it was the Democrats.

They created this ugly Hitlerite, neo-Hitlerite ideology.

They breathed new life into it.

I mean, Trump didn't need to be interpreted as far right or Hitler. That was liberals who did that. Why did they do that? Because deep down,

they're tempted by Nazism. And they believe in it themselves.

And this, you know, it's like, this feels like it's crazy until you look at what happened in Ukraine.

And then you look at what happened in Ukraine and you're like yeah no yeah what i'm talking about is very much grounded in reality like it's not far off at all that these same people would eventually find themselves on the same team and the same side as neo-Nazis because it's happened before.

And it's starting to... Did you guys notice that all neo-Nazism, on X, at least,

is increasingly pro-Nado and anti-Russia?

openly pro-NATO.

That didn't used to be the case before Richard Spencer.

Then Richard Spencer was fringe, and most of them still had this delusion that Russia was on their side or something.

And then finally, now it's like they're fully

endorsing NATO now.

I've seen

neo-Nazis

complain about

J.D. Vance's

threat

to harm

NATO.

What about

Groypers?

The Groypers are

powerless

because they don't harm NATO. What about Groypers? The Groypers are powerless.

Because they don't and will never be capable of building institutions.

To build institutions, you have to be a Marxist.

But here's the problem.

You know who could legitimate Groyper's, the DSA?

If Groyper's started

joining DSA

and uniting with them,

it seems crazy that this uniting with them.

It seems crazy that this would ever happen now,

but thinking objectively in terms of the long term,

the class similarities.

Yeah, Groypers can be empowered by the imperialist state if they join the DSA.

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

Groypers wouldn't use their pronouns. You'd be surprised you'd be surprised the dsay would probably rebrand oh yeah i don't know yeah i would

but what i'm saying assumes that that would happen, of course.

But when I say a preemptive strike to disperse and shatter their organization, there won't be an organization to rebrand if we're successful.

We'll just shatter and disperse them to the wind so they will be alone and isolated and powerless so we are going to uh yeah white unity dsa you know there would have been no nazism if communists destroyed social democracy after 1917.

If German social democracy was successfully defeated by communists, there would have been

no Hitler or Nazis. And the DSA is worse than the Social Democrats in Germany were after 1917, much worse. I'm also going to propose another thing.

I could also be overestimating the hype.

The DSA could just die down.

Could just die down. and become irrelevant and that this recent thing is just not going to last.

But where the Democrats, it's so unpredictable unpredictable where are the democrats going to go now

because i genuinely think a lot of the left leftists that are interpreting the defeat of the

democratic party and the way that they are they're like the Democratic Party and the way that they are.

They're like, the problem with the Democrats

is that they were trying too hard to be MAGA

instead of AOC,

but they don't realize AOC-style politics

doesn't work in this country.

It doesn't fucking in this country. It doesn't

fucking work.

Straight up,

it doesn't work.

Politics

is either muscular

or it's not

mass politics.

You can have a pussy or it's not mass politics.

You can have a pussy bitch politics if you're a dictator who, not only a dictator, a severely unpopular dictator.

Then you can be a fucking bitch and pussy. because you don't have to care about what anyone

thinks but if you need if you're winning on the basis of elections you have to be muscular Trying to run a mayoral candidate in NYC.

I don't remember them talking about the DSA.

Look, brother, I'm not saying that they're literally talking about the DSA right now.

I'm making an objective prediction, sorry, an objective analysis, and inferring a long-term prediction.

It hasn't come to pass yet, all right?

Clearly it hasn't happened yet.

I'm just saying, what future is the far right going to have without the mass base and institutional support? Think about this, you know? How are they going to grow? How are they going to... I expected... Once...

Fuck this.

I'm so fucking sick of kick.

Fuck.

Two's?

Two's?

Two's? Two's.

All right, we're back at twos.

Right.

No, we're not.

All right, it's like delayed by 30 seconds.

All right.

Anyway,

um...

Thinking about it in the long term,

DSA,

uh...

They are social fascists,

and, uh,

strategically, I think the smart thing right now is breaking them as a preemptive action.

Preemptive.

But what is the basis of this declaration of war formally?

Formally speaking, we're going to war with the DSA because of their relentless

their relentless lying and attacks on our party.

So that's why.

If they leave us alone, we'll leave them alone.

But they're not going to leave us alone.

So preemptively, we're going to liquidate and wipe them out

so that we won't have this threat constantly on our fucking backs attacking us.

The declass PMC might be swayed by the high-tech success of China.

Weekend, here's the issue. I think that those people will falsely interpret china's existence

they're basically going to say look at all of the far right lies about china not far right

the populist right lies about china that it's a evil technocracy ruled by, and then they're going to be like, yeah, that's based, which is the same thing that I described earlier as far as corruption. China is also a populistic country that is imbued with a popular, meaningful character.

Xi Jinping is a leader. He's not a robot. He's a leader.

And China's political state is not based in pure data. It's based in a very specific passion for China's existence and its history, and it's the one China policy, and it's non-negotiable.

So the problem with the technocratic sympathies with China that some

leftists who wear glasses had

is that they

are, they're

representing China in a way that ignore

that only, that is one side.

It ignores the human side of China.

It ignores the populistic side of China.

It ignores the side of China that has a subjective side in a sense where it's not just pure rule by data. It's also rule according to the, a specific and determinate character of the whole people in the country and history itself and the development of history and the lofty ideas of communism and so on and so on

it's dialectical you know it's the dialectical aspect that they're missing All right, guys. All right, guys.

I think we're going to,

we're going to end the stream

because it's late.

And I've kept you up longer than I intended to frankly

I should start sitting like this anyway I hope you understand better my thoughts on the striking the DSA before they become a bigger problem for us than they already are.

Um... problem for us than they already are. Iron Rose. Holy shit. Thank you, brother. I'm glad I didn't end the stream.

Iron Rose. Thank you, brother. I'm glad I didn't end the stream. Iron Rose. Thank you, brother. Australia

Stanley. Listen, I don't mean to be like this.

But if you plan on

gifting subs, do it now

so I can shout you out. Because what i fucking hate is when i end the stream

and you guys gift subs and then i feel like shit because i didn't thank you so

20 didn't thank you. So 20 19

Ah, the stream is delayed

anyway.

What an incredible

grifting tactic.

This is like someone is still asking if you play Hoy 4.

Uh, I've never played Hoy 4 in my life

and I've

only learned about what that is

because I

started

interacting with weirdos

on the internet

thank you Travali

appreciate it I on the internet. Thank you, Travali. Appreciate it.

All right, Travali is the last call before the stream ends. Goodbye, guys. I'll see you.