🔴 RED NEWS | MASSIVE DEBATE ROYALE | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES

See, there's no one to thank.

All right.

Uh hello.

Welcome everyone.

Uh today's going to be a chiller stream than yesterday.

Not a lot of the anger, not a lot of the emotions running high.

Uh but nonetheless, uh

A very important stream that I want you guys to save and I'm gonna tell you parts to clip even and whatever.

Uh because there's a lot I think needs to be clarified about the recent offensive we're gonna be waging against the Democratic Par uh sorry, against the Democratic Socialists of America, of the DSA.

Actually

I wanted to start the stream by saying that

It was completely mistaken.

You see, I'm Hans Fjord Hans from Sweden and I wanted to say that, you know, the future of American politics is going to really be about the Nordic model.

We're going to basically have IKEA socialism.

And basically, you know, it's all about the Nordic model.

And, you know, you see, this is what's going to create and defeat capitalism.

Because we really don't want to defeat capitalism.

It's really disco Elysium.

It's not...

it's the capitalist.

It's just like an existential crisis.

And it's just going we're going to sit in IKEA and just have you know, it's going to be so it's going to be so fetch, like they say in Mean Girls.

You know, we're all in New York and, you know, we just want the Nordic socialism.

And then this is what the DSA is all about.

You see, it's just it's so it's so trendy.

I mean, why don't we just all have free shit?

You know, just everything, make it all free.

I mean, just everything for free like they do in Europe.

Have you been to Europe?

I was in Paris.

Oh my god, Europe is so nice.

Anyway, I can't tell what character I'm playing right now.

But uh basically we're going to be the D S A and it's going to be about Nordic socialism.

And basically what we're going to do is uh more or less uh we're going to basically uh well, it's b basically the same thing as Adolf Hitler, but you know, because when you know, when the Germans came and occupied us, uh we completely collaborated with them and did nothing to fight them or resist them, because all we care about is IKEA and Nordic Socialism.

And, you know, I was going to America and basically

You know, in America, they just it's just like Americans love so much sugar.

You know, I'm Hans Fjord and I'm from Sweden and Americans just they just ha uh have so much sugar.

You know, it's just like I go to the coffee shop and I say, Can I have a baguette?

You know, it's a famous pastry we have here in Europe.

Here in Europe, you know.

And I had my baguette and you know, I was shocked at the content of sugar.

And I was like, wow, Americans truly love their sugar.

I did see an advertisement for Dairy Queen, and it seemed like there were some new delicacies in cuisine.

Of course, not as exquisitely presented as we do in Europe.

You're in Europe.

Anyway, I went to the Dairy Queen and I basically asked for their double chunk chocolate pumpkin coffee ice cream.

And lo and behold, it is really just sugar.

So I seen there is no exquisite sensitivity to the delicacies of taste.

It's just sugar.

That's just what Americans like is sugar.

I'm so smart.

I was educated in a fucking university.

And we have free healthcare and we are Nordic.

And then who fucking pays for it?

We pay for it.

The American dollar pays for it.

Europe is a welfare queen from the Marshall Plan.

So I don't want to hear this shit about Nordic socialism because we're already paying for them.

Did you know that we're paying for their healthcare?

We pay for everyone's fucking healthcare.

Because it's our country that set up our government or whatever, our deep state.

They set up the entire global system that, you know, Europe is living at the beneficence of the American worker, frankly.

I don't wanna I hate to say it.

I don't wanna cause bad blood between us and European comrades, but let's face some harsh truths.

European social democracy was built.

Well, not necessarily the American worker.

Also, the slaves of the

You know, the third world that we're integrated in America's global system.

But it's all the American empire, and it's paying for all of it.

So.

I don't want to hear about this nonsense about IKEA and all this.

By the way, you know, I hate I also don't want to say this, but I'm gonna be real about some shit.

Fuck IKEA.

I fucking hate IKEA.

Everything I've bought from IKEA causes me misery every time I look at it.

I just feel so miserable when I look at bullshit I bought from IKEA.

I'm just like, fuck.

What an empty, hollow

like shell of a piece of furniture that is.

And the food at Ikea is garbage, by the way.

Ah, please, you know, you're please, Sweden, stop trying to fucking do french fries.

You don't know how to do it.

It's disgusting.

It tastes like cardboard.

All right, IKEA, go to hell.

Frankly.

Frankly.

All right.

I'm not against Nordic countries.

Those countries are cool when you're when we're actually talking about like their countries, right?

Like their actual history, their actual culture, their actual ways and whatever.

That's fine.

I'm not against that.

I don't like this like Americanized

you know, post-war like nonsense

That's that that most Americans associate with Europe.

I just fucking hate that.

All right.

Anyway, I'm not gonna go on this rant because uh this is not just a rant about IKEA and uh Nordic countries.

Um I'm here to talk about

If you're confused, why I've decided that

we need to nuke uh the DSA.

And this is a long term project, by the way.

We're gonna be first um infiltrating them.

Well, we're not gonna infiltrate them.

We're going to um

We're going to have people outside I'm not even gonna explain the plan.

Anyway, we're we're s we're preparing.

We're preparing for uh

Dispersing and dismantling that organization.

Frankly, I'm not saying we want to compete with the DSA because we don't.

We don't want to compete with the DSA.

Compare the demographics of the D S A to the demographics of our party.

Can we compete with them?

How many blue collar workers are in the DSA compared to our party?

Uh what what?

We're gonna we're gonna recruit lip tards that have trump derangement syndrome?

No, we're not.

But I'm not thinking in terms of Trump.

I'm not thinking in terms of

I'm not thinking in terms of woke tards or any of that stuff.

It's all that's all.

I'm thinking ahead.

I'm really thinking ahead.

And you need to trust my judgment on this.

Because I can't help but think about something.

And you know, I want this stream to open up dialogue within our party with respect to this analysis.

Because if you want to challenge this analysis and you're in the party, again, if you're in the party, I want you to use the appropriate channels of communication within our party, you know, our journal, whatever.

And maybe you can disagree, maybe you can have a different analysis.

Maybe you can agree with me with a new perspective.

And I want to open up this discussion in general.

Lysenko with the 10.

Here we go.

Here we go.

Um

But here's my analysis and here's why I think it's time to strike the DSA.

Now, first of all, I noticed that Donald and I want you to clip this and send it to him 'cause I don't really have time to deal with his nonsense.

But uh Donald Parkinson and his Marxist unity group think that this is like a dig at them.

Um

You know, to the DSA's credit, they're actually a very large organization.

And Marxist unity group is very small, and we don't really care about them at all.

So, Donald, if you were leading the DSA, maybe this would be different.

But you're not leading the DSA.

You have no control over the DSA.

Your influence even within the DSA is pretty negligible.

And when I say your influence, I'm talking about how the average DSA rank and file, like to what extent are they listening to you?

They're not listening to you.

They don't give a shit about you.

So

frankly, I don't know if they need to be humbled as far as their prestige within the DSA is concerned, but it's not very significant.

Our differences with uh Donald and uh that group, uh we can sort out we could sort those out polemically very easily.

There's no need for us to take such a drastic action.

I mean, if their strategy worked, we wouldn't have a problem with it.

We have a problem with it because it evidently doesn't work.

If you don't know what Donald is doing, I don't want to make it personal.

What the, let's just call them MUG.

If you don't know what they're doing,

What they're basically doing is they are

Students of Lars Lee, a guy named Lars Lee, who's a scholar on the Russian so history of the Bolshevik Party, more or less.

And Lennon, you know, Lennon Rediscovered, it's a very big book.

I have it here actually.

It's not it's not the worst book.

I don't agree with a lot of it, but it is very informative.

And then there's also Mike McNair and this kind of idea of the new center.

you know, that there needs to be a new uh revolutionary center.

Away from the ultra radicalism sorry, the ultra leftism and uh away from the rightist uh opportunism of reformism.

And uh, you know, marginally I kind of respect this idea that they have that they want to return to some kind of like party building thing.

which is r which is based in the tradition of political realism, actually.

That's what took hold in the Second International.

So I don't hate those I don't hate that perspective.

I just think it's fundamentally wrong.

And I'll explain why.

Donald or whoever from MUG

I get that you think that we are now in the stage of the Second International and early 1900s Russian social democracy, because to be honest, there's no other faction of social democracy that ever amounted to anything.

So Russian social democracy and that oh, they're democratic socialists.

So this is just like the social democrats in the late 19th century and early 20th century.

Uh there's one slight problem with that though.

Which is that, like, I don't know, like, a fucking century has passed of actual communist political traditions and states.

And state traditions and revolutionary strategies, and that's actually a century of that has passed.

And, um,.

I understand you know, he's a LARPer.

A lot of us are deep down we want to be LARPers, or we sympathize with it, or we were LARPers, and in some ways some of us are still LARPers, some of us like LARPing.

But Donald is also a LARPer.

He's LARPing as if he's living in uh pre-revolutionary social democracy.

And oh, we're we're gonna oh, you have no idea what w you know, d the next stage is gonna be we're the Bolsheviks, but we have to get there in stages.

And it's it's just fundamentally misguided.

Uh I I prefer basically like Red Army Ushanka LARP, uh because at least that will inspire some degree of like militancy in you.

But no, the problem with that perspective is well

It's stagism.

It's worse than stagism.

Stagism is a mistaken perspective about the nature of revolutionary strategy with respect to entire countries.

But the weird form of stagism that MUG partakes in is a stagism where they somehow expect

That okay, we have our own beliefs.

about what a party should be.

But we're going to suspend those beliefs and because we're not at the right stage to form the fucking party in the first place.

So we have to be in the DSA and

accelerate the DSA to the point where it's going to be advanced enough to be a party.

You know, it's like Menshevism was saying this about an entire country.

It was like, okay, you know, we're not at the right stage to seize power.

We're going to let the bourgeoisie seize power first, and then that will create the opportune conditions for us.

But no, they're saying, no, no, we need to help prop up the DSA, which will then allow us to take over the DSA.

So it's like, it's kind of silly in my eyes.

You know, I don't take that seriously.

I don't find it a threat.

to the point where we need to declare war.

I just don't take it seriously.

They they d uh and the results speak for themselves.

Our party's been around for three, four months.

Look what we've accomplished.

They've been around for years.

All right.

So that's all I want to say about MUG and Donald Parkinson's nonsense strategy within the DSA.

A DSA is not a political party.

In the first place,

No, when we're talking about the DSA, we're talking about the average member of the DSA, the Hassan Piker viewer, the unironic Rose emoji.

We're not talking about Donald Parkinson with his advanced, you know, his advanced, you know, Marxist background doing Takia and playing the long game, but he's only fooling himself.

We're not talking about that.

We're talking about the average DSA member who is just a fucking liptard at wrong time of the month liptard.

And I'm talking about men.

Here.

I don't want to be vulgar or offend.

But frankly, it's just a fucking lip tard.

It's just the average DSA person is a lip tard who is just super angry and upset.

Well, angry.

It's just a seething lip tard.

It's just a lip tard gone crazy.

Lip tards gone crazy, right?

That's the average DSA member.

Love it or hate it.

That's the average DSA member.

Uh

And i it's kind of I didn't put two to two together, but we tracked and located that a lot of the hostile posts on social media slandering our party.

The one I talked about yesterday got 6,000 likes, and it quote tweeted a video of me showcasing community service we were doing in Carbondale, and they fedjacketed us, a person from the DSA, and the 6,000 people who liked it.

You know, we can guess how many of that are bots, but there is a demographic that is driving these attacks on our party, and it's coming from the DSA.

Those are the people that were slandering us from the very beginning.

It's DSA people.

It always has been them.

We used to think it was CPUSA and Joe Sims activating bots.

But no, there is a mass base for...

Social fascism, and it's the DSA.

And we have to think about the long-term implications of that fact in light of the new.

outcome which I personally was not necessarily expecting that Trump won.

I thought it was possible, but I

I was preparing more for a Kamala Presidency because that would have been required much more immediate um improvisation on our part.

The Trump victory buys us a little more time to think, and that's why I'm saying we can open some discussion on this.

Well, in any case, if Kamala won, we expected that we're gonna just have to ignore the liberal leftists completely and just go straight march on the far right right away because um they would have won bigly from that victory.

If Kamala won, the far right would have completely um when I say the far right, I'm not talking about MAGA.

MAGA is not the far right.

I'm talking about the neo-Nazis.

I mean, they would have been uh emboldened not only emboldened, but the shock of a Kamala victory would have definitely made many people it would have strengthened their pipeline a lot.

And uh that would not have been good news for us.

Oh, the far right might have.

No, not might have.

The neo-Nazis, they have fucking been s completely.

Defeated by Trump's victory.

Again, this is an objective analysis.

All this Hitler stuff and Hitler posting.

Was a type of false consciousness that was generated on the basis of outrage in the face of Joe Biden.

Of the fact that basically, I'll explain it.

The president was senile, so clearly he was not the one in control.

And the far right flourished in this environment where it was just such a degree of demoralization.

you know, um, hitting young men especially, let's be frank about the demographic in question.

And the far right.

I I need people to understand something.

Um

In terms of this analysis I have

Well, this kind of is heavy theoretically.

But I want to break it down in the eas most easily digestible.

You guys ever you know those like Agartha Joe Biden memes where like the uh the sun wheel is behind Joe Biden?

That is actually like a real thing.

Joe Biden's victory in twenty twenty really did cement

And strengthen the real neo-Nazis, the real, like, you know, when I say the neo-Nazis, I mean the neo-Nazi internationale, so to speak.

The one that stretches from the New Zealand shooter to Ukraine to Europe and here, the Joe Biden Sun and Rand.

Yeah, that one, that's the real neo-Nazi.

Those neo-Nazis, that criminal element, the whatever, like those, that is a force of nihilism.

And the victory of the Democratic Party in 2020 was a victory of nihilism.

And I don't know how to explain this in a properly nuanced way.

It's extremely theoretical.

It's extremely, in a way, abstract.

And I know most people don't have the patience for it, but please bear with me.

So

If you want to think about the conflict between Trump and the Democratic Party, what you really have is a conflict between.

A politics that's based in

Um

A specific kind of like determination, right?

Which is, you know, uh Trump calls it, you know, make America great again.

Let's

Focus inward.

Let's focus on the content of America.

And so it's kind of, it has this substance to it that endows it with at least the appearance of a human quality and the appearance of a meaningfulness.

That at least there's this illusion that some kind of meaningful goal is animating the entire machinery of politics and the state.

And Trump, you know, he has a plan, so to speak.

And

That places Trump in proximity with the kind of global authoritarianism trend, if you want to speak Libtardese, right?

What is a pop filter?

I don't know what the fuck that is.

Sleeper cell, can you please

What is a pop filter?

Now I'm like what is going on?

Nobody knows, even you don't know.

It's the circle thing in front of mics.

Okay, it's my mic.

Alright, well I don't care about that.

Anyway, um that's what places him in proximity to that.

And again, we could talk about oh no, he's a sellout.

Y that's we know, I mean we know, but but still there's s some kind of conflict, uh at least the appearance of one, and that's enough for the purposes of this explanation of the far right's relationship to the Democratic Party.

But so this idea of like focusing on America specifically and that coming at the expense, again, superficially, at the expense of the a lot of this is so abstract.

Like we're talking about kind of

Something so virtual, right?

Um

We're not talking about policies.

We're talking about a specific relationship to accredited and legitimated institutions as the authority, right?

The problem that the Democrats have with Trump is the alternative facts, it's his way it's the perception that he delegitimizes the credibility of expert rule and Fauci and whatever.

And it's like that is at the heart of a deep conflict, you know?

And we can go into the analysis more, but in good faith, I think most people know what I'm talking about there.

But when Biden won, that was a victory of the kind of Western liberal universalism, which is, you know, the open society.

It's an open-endedness, which is necessarily a nothingness.

It's an indeterminate outcome.

That is the victory of the purity of democracy, unblemished by this hyper-partisan, hyper-particular, and hyper-you know, extremely determinate populist voice.

I mean, Trump is a populist, right?

Whereas Biden kind of represented the impersonal rule of the Leviathan, so to speak, right?

Um

And that was so um evident from the fact that Biden was senile.

He wasn't even a personality.

Trump is a personality.

Trump is actually like a living, breathing person.

He's funny.

He's got uh a personality.

He has character.

And that gives politics a sense of warmness and familiarity, right?

But Biden is what?

Biden is you guys remember the memes of Biden with glowing red eyes?

Biden represents the impersonal nothingness, the nihil of the state, right?

He represents this impersonal cruelty of Hobbes's Leviathan.

You know uh this is the pure data, pure science, pure truth of the experts.

which is completely indifferent and alienated from any kind of human reality.

And that is what the Democrats kind of represent in the information age.

They represent a politics that is radically inhuman.

And I'll I'll get to more details about that in a second.

It's a radically inhuman politics.

And I'm not saying that means they're evil, although this is why we get evil vibes from them.

It's not personal actually.

It's just because this is the nature of changes in the the relations uh and forces of production.

And they the Democrats have come to reflect that more purely than anyone else.

Of course the Republicans are just as inhuman in practice.

This is not a moral judgment.

This is not a normative judgment.

But I'm saying that the democratic politics has become technocratic politics.

It has become uh um uh it has become very much like uh robotic for a reason.

And that's just because

In their eyes, in the eyes of Democratic ideologists, and they don't even think that they have an ideology, they are just giving expression to the cruel and impersonal truth of reality in their political existence.

And for them, truth is excised of a human element.

It's pure data, it's pure, you know, whatever.

And then, on the other hand, it seems like Democrats are possessed by this, like, you know, politics that's based on extreme emotions.

And that's where all the woke stuff and the social justice or whatever stuff seems to come from.

But it's really the tension between those two things that defines what the Democrats are and what Libtards are.

It's there, there obviously is some kind of theological basis to this in the American Protestant tradition.

Which I'm not going to go into.

But more or less, it's the simultaneous coincidence of a world of total depravity on the one hand that cannot be trusted, that's by itself, completely blind and indifferent to us.

And on the other hand, the radical anxiety that this catalyzes in us to be radically empathetic and do everything we can to take care of people.

Because at the end of the day, song, appreciate you.

Because at the end of the day, although we have a very grim view about the objective reality, that actually inspires us, if you're a Democrat, them to be radically good at the subjective level.

And that is kind of the source of the paradox.

But it's also why there is a real proximity between the Democratic Party and fascism.

It's about the way in which they

Um, view objective reality, not the performative, subjective response they have to that, which makes it seem like they're too emotional and they're too humane and they're too like uh good or whatever, right?

But that is just

A reaction to the very dark and nihilistic outlook they have with respect to objective reality, right?

Ones if you're like following along and this kinda makes sense, 'cause I'm really trying to dumb it down the best way I can.

Anyway, I know a lot of neo-Nazis were really happy when Joe Biden won because it really was a victory of this kind of metaphysical outlook of nihilism, right?

That this is a world of total depravity, the world of Hobbes' metaphysics, of his classical political theory, that objective reality is completely devoid of meaning, and that the only meaningfulness of objective reality is an extent of our kind of, you know, subjective.

Our vacuum sealed subjective activity.

And for neo-Nazis, that's actually how they look at the world.

The world, they'll say, is full of a bunch of subhumans, you know, whatever they say, the N-word, um, bla the black and brown hordes, you know.

And then they'll simultaneously attempt to articulate humanity in the racial solidarity because, in their view, the white race needs to it's so delicate and it's so pure, it needs to kind of protect itself from the cruelty and the evil of objective reality, right?

So, it's a similar kind of thing.

And they have obviously the hyper-Darwinist view, and they trust the science, and they even apply it when it comes to race and IQ.

And they it's it's really um, Dr.

Fauci is really Joseph Mengel or something.

This this view of you just need to trust the impersonal science.

Well, they have the same outlook, right?

Name one person with this worldview: Richard Spencer, uh, Jared Taylor, uh, the whole BAP crowd, uh, and uh, the Azov battalion, uh, to go further, the people in the Order of Nine Angels, um.

The Nazis in Ukraine, the shooter in uh New Zealand.

The various neo-Nazi groups in the United States, you know, the Blood Tribe and the Patriot Front, they have this outlook.

Isn't Bap right-wing pro-Trump?

Uh, yeah, but um, well, Bap is not really a to be fair, he's not really like.

Exactly what I'm talking about here.

But he does share a lot of the qualities I'm talking about with respect to the view of objective reality.

But um,.

Obviously, he's articulating it in a different way, and not that's not to say neo-Nazis support the Democrats exclusively.

Obviously, some of them were very happy about Trump, but I'm talking about deep down, you know, there uh uh there was something very empowering about Biden's victory for them, and that was proven in the fact that they have never been more powerful than under Biden's administration.

And they were incredibly convincing and persuasive to people because in the rain, put it this way.

The reign of the Democrats is kind of like a nihilistic realism.

But the reign of Trump

opens up like I don't want to be cringe, but it's almost kind of like magical.

It's like a magical realism, right?

It's like it's introducing a kind of surrealistic dimension to the political where the scientists and the people in lab co they are completely powerless to explain or understand any of it.

So that's why they do much worse in these circumstances.

Um in any case.

How did I get here?

Well, yeah, I was talking about why the far right was in power.

So if Kamala won, that would have been accelerated to like a huge degree.

And Richard Spencer knew that, which is why he supported Kamala Harris and the Democrats.

He of course he knew it.

He himself had a lot of experience in terms of understanding how the far right grows.

Why do I call the DSA social fascist?

I'll explain.

Don't don't worry, I'm gonna get to that.

There's a lot of things um I've shelled.

Hopefully I remember all of them.

So if Kamala won, that would be our primary strategy, is we have to deal with that.

And it's a completely different strategy, actually.

But uh

Now that Trump has won, the the the the

what what we can anticipate is going to happen is a little different.

By the way, a lot of people are asking me about like, oh, what about Trump, uh, his cabinet picks?

And I'm like,

You know, it's kind of frustrating because if I for two years have been saying that I don't trust Trump at all, and he probably is completely compromised, and yeah, he's gonna he's he already sold out.

I mean, why is it that when we say something, for example, me and Jackson,

When we say something

We say, yeah, if Trump's elected, it's only because they allowed him to get elected, right?

And then we get proven correct, and people are so shocked by it that they want to come and ask.

Not talking about you guys, I'm talking about, for example, the social fascists that are now slandering us, claiming that we were shocked by Trump's cabinet picks.

We're not shocked by them.

If they're referring to Jackson's tweets, Jackson isn't shocked.

I talk to Jackson almost every day.

Jackson is the one who predicted this would happen.

So, why did Jackson waste time trying to?

Trying to use his platform to promote the idea of other people getting picked.

Well, maybe you just don't know about everything going on behind the scenes in terms of what the outcome of this kind of posts actually has.

Maybe.

Maybe, as a matter of fact, there's a more long term plan as far as building certain bridges.

I'm not even gonna I'm not even gonna go there.

In any case, no, no one had any illusions that that would actually happen.

But it does create the context for an opposition to Trump.

And that's why when Jackson's tweeting about how Trump betrayed his, he's not talking to you, and he's not talking to me.

He talks to me on the phone.

He's talking to Trump's base.

He's communicating to Trump's base.

Look at what is happening in real time.

When Kyle Idiot Kalinsky is gloating that, oh, how could you be surprised by what Trump did given what he did in 2016?

I mean, we're not surprised, but his base is certainly surprised by it.

And his base is going to look for answers.

Are they going to look for answers in a guy that's just mocking them and laughing at them?

No.

They're going to look for answers in people who can meaningfully explain what's going on.

And that's what Jackson is doing.

So no one's shocked by anything.

It's not news.

We knew this would happen.

We were never even happy or optimistic about Trump.

We were happy about the defeat of the Democratic Party.

And those are two very different things.

Those are two very different things, and I'll tell you the difference.

The difference is we have bought some temporary chaos because that's what the Republican Party is, it's a circus and always has been.

But the Democratic Party is such a strong and powerful machine, especially for disarming the left.

And so that loss that they suffered was incredibly good for us.

In any case, uh I want to get back to the DSA thing.

But I'm uh appraising the situation now, and I see the writing on the wall.

The far right is fundamentally disarmed by Trump's election.

So I don't see far right paramilitary groups gaining any traction any time soon.

I think the far right is extremely confused, shocked and disoriented.

And I don't think the far right is going to be able to articulate independent far right politics in the Trump era.

I don't think so.

I think one of the reasons the far right were able to be as powerful as they were like America First, by the way,

In 2016, is because they had foot soldiers, which the media and you know leftist activists portrayed as Trump's foot soldiers, as if Trump is Mussolini and these are his black shirts.

So that illusion, which was not true, by the way.

Gave them a lot of prominence and prestige and power.

But this time around, that illusion will never.

Um, will never uh uh stand.

Trump doesn't have like a fascist black shirt base that's going to go and beat people up for him in cities with sticks or whatever.

Like, it's not going to happen.

There aren't gonna be any MAGA black shirts.

It's nonsense.

Especially this time around.

Especially this time around.

Fascists in the police force and ICE are happy about Trump's victory.

Uh well.

What do you mean by fascists, though?

Think about that.

What do you mean by fascists?

Because are they the same fascists that were under Obama?

Okay, sure.

But again, he doesn't have he doesn't have a mass organization.

I I feel like you guys can get where I'm getting at here.

He doesn't have like a mass organization that is going to be able to enforce politics on the street and in real life.

You see, people don't under they they keep making the same mistake.

The same mistake over and over again, right?

And it's very simple.

Trump is not like some Mussolini fascist threat.

He's just a normal American politician.

He's not going to deploy black shirts across America to enforce his will.

He's not going to implement some radical agenda that is discontinuous with the plan of the regime that has been going on for decades.

It's a continuation of the same plan.

And there's going to be smooth continuity.

He's not going to resort to, you know.

Oh, Trump is g no, he's not going to do anything that Kamala wasn't going to do.

There's nothing going to be surprising with respect to that.

If there's anything drastic that happens under Trump, it was going to happen no matter who was President.

Because as you should have learned from the four years of Joe Biden, the President isn't actually the ruler of our country.

If there's things you guys should clip, it's really this.

Um the president doesn't rule our country.

Joe Biden was senile for four years.

He had dementia.

He was not cognitively in a state of mind where he was even capable of communicating to journalists, let alone making major decisions of governance and administration.

So if you can have someone who has dementia be the president of the United States for four years, it's pretty solid proof that the president is not running the show.

And that should have been everyone's takeaway after Trump's election in 2016.

Trump didn't betray MAGA because he's a bad guy.

He betrayed MAGA because everyone found out that the president doesn't actually matter.

His decisions don't actually matter.

There is a machine, there is a regime, and it's gonna go in the direction it's gonna go in because it's not controlled by the president, it's controlled by an oligarchical, global capitalist class.

And that's who controls it, and that's who runs it, and that's who makes all the decisions before you ever even hear that they're even being considered.

So, you need to understand that.

That's square one of opposing the regime in the Trump era.

Stop making it about Trump.

Trump is not special.

One of the biggest mistakes I saw after twenty sixteen is people

Oh, Trump's a dictator.

Trump's a you know, you're you know, you're Oedipalizing it.

Trump is not your dad.

All right.

If Trump was a dictator, that wouldn't even be a bad thing necessarily.

He'd be like Putin or something.

That's not what he is.

All right?

He's just a a person he's just a celebrity and

He's funny.

I mean, that's it.

He doesn't actually rule the state, though.

He doesn't rule the state.

So anyone who tries to oppose the regime in the next four years Oh, Cheeto Mussolini, I'm going to make effigies of Trump as an orange man and mock the orange man.

It's like you're an idiot.

It doesn't matter mocking the it's stupid.

You're not opposing the regime by doing that, you're just

You know.

You're just uh s siding with a faction of the regime.

The resistance, it's nonsense.

It's total nonsense.

He doesn't have any power.

He's not worth being angry at or hating or opposing.

Because you can't oppose the President.

It's nonsense.

You can oppose the regime.

You can oppose the entire regime, though.

So I want to get that out of the way.

But in any case, look.

Um

This war we're going to be waging against the DSA is not personal.

It's not based in the very personal, I'll be frank, personal hatred I have for DSA, which I do.

I do hate them on a personal level, and I I don't like admitting that, because hatred is not a good feeling to have, but I hate

They're corruption.

I hate how they're corruption.

I just see them as the epitome of corruption.

I hate their corruption because if you ask an average DSA person, like, don't you know who Michael Harrington was and what the DSA actually was founded to be?

They'll kind of scoff at it and be like, uh-huh.

But we run it now.

We don't care about that.

So many of us are reading Mao.

And it just reminds me of like a spoiled brat daughter who's like using all of her dad's money, her billionaire dad's money, but is like simultaneously pretending to be like a radical.

I get to use daddy's money however I want.

I just find it corrupt.

It's fucking corruption.

If you hate your dad so fucking much, then stop taking his money.

If you don't like Democratic Socialism and Michael Harrington, then form a different fucking organization and form a different fucking party.

What, you're just there because everyone else is?

This is what I'm trying to get to.

Who is this everyone else?

That's really the object of my concern here.

Who is the everyone else that makes the DSA popular?

That makes the DSA something that has a relative degree of plausible deniability from the actual Democratic Party?

Who are its demographic?

What makes it a mass organization?

Well, it doesn't matter what Donald wants to do.

It doesn't matter what all these factions want to do.

Here's the truth.

The DSA

Is a compatible organization with the hegemony.

All of the NGOs.

all of the academic institutions, all of the institutionalized CIA created civil society.

The DSA swims in this reality like fish in water.

Who do they recruit from?

Do they recruit from ordinary, regular working people?

Do they recruit from young people disalli No, they recruit from young people that are being declassed.

Young people who are disappointed by their inability for their careers to, you know.

To develop in the way they wanted it to.

That's their demographic.

Their demographic, their mass base is in the same mass base that historically and traditionally

was the mass base of fascism.

A downwardly mobile petty bourgeoisie

Um and petty bourgeoisie, we're talking about we're not talking about small business owners.

The petty bourgeoisie referred to the professional class, always, by the way.

And they're being lumpinized.

I'm a Marxist.

I don't think in terms of emotions or ideology necessarily.

But isn't there a degree of affinity between the ideology being cooked up by a lot of neo-Nazis and this mass base?

What if they started talking to each other?

What if a dialogue any kind of dialogue opened up?

Between the actual Hitlerites

and the D S A.

We'd be in trouble.

We'd be in trouble as the ACP.

Because we're not big enough

We don't have enough of a base in the Amer actual American working class yet to withstand that.

And right now, again, we've been ignoring the DSA, but every time we go viral doing anything, garnering attention among the American working class.

They have to lie and slander about us and it goes viral.

They make it go viral.

They are capable of concentrating so much negative attention toward us.

And again, it's the same strategy.

I know this because they used that same strategy against me personally in late 2021 and early 2022.

All those people I was beefing with and fighting with, it wasn't just BreadTube, it was the DSA.

That's who it was.

So

They're doing that.

They're trying to do that to our party now.

They're trying to label us with all these bad labels.

They try to fedjacket us.

They try to call us a crypto scam.

Every single time, consistently, it was the DSA.

And who was stifling our efforts to take over CPUSA?

What, the mass rank and file of CPUSA?

No, it was the DSA.

It was the DSA who were rightfully threatened by this initiative we had of reforming the CPUSA.

Because the ideology of DSA is corruption.

It's the same thing that exists in the Democratic Party.

I want to communicate this very clearly.

The corruption in question is the following.

My politics in practice are this milquetoast

Lip tard nonsense, AOC, I'm gonna vote for Kamala, whatever.

But I keep up the red specter of extreme far-left, whatever Marxism, as like a, oh, we could always go more left.

Punished Bernie, we could always go more left, but they'll never go that left.

They just kind of keep it as a false and illusory source of leverage.

So the reason a lot of red libs, you see, they're called, we call them red libs, they're not actually Marxist-Leninists when they're sharing pro-Stalin memes.

They're not actual principled Stalinists.

They're using these memes, and that's all they are, as an illusory form of leverage, the boogeyman of communism, to give substance to their otherwise weak and ineffectual liberal politics.

And the Democrats do the same.

They did the same with Bernie.

That's what Bernie Sanders serves the function of in the Democratic Party.

But within the DSA, the idea is not that they're ever going to become MLs or communists.

The idea is that, oh, well, we're reading it.

And, oh, like they kind of perversely enjoy the contradiction of being in a democratic socialist organization while simultaneously flirting.

And that's the best way I could describe it.

Flirting with these extremely radical ideas.

And keeping those ideas at a distance while simultaneously flirting with them is the source of gratification for them.

Um

It's a virtual projection.

Of a power that they don't have, but that they need to feel like they have.

They need to feel like they

can project the power of Stalin and the Soviet Union and Marxism.

And China and whatever, right?

This is exactly, I'm describing Hassan Piker too, by the way.

But

They can never actually be that, but they need it to be this kind of perfect, like platonic idea that they are just the imperfect shadow of.

And they need to maintain that purity.

Like, it always needs to be something so pure that it doesn't exist, right?

Which should not come as a this general psychopathology or symptom is best epitomized by the other perspective in the DSA, which is that real communism has never been tried, and those were all corruptions of real communism, and the real thing is like super pure, and it's too pure to ever exist.

Well, they have a lot of times they do the same thing, except when it comes to actual communist states, where they're like, yeah, it's just over there in like history, or like over there in China, or like it's totally like far.

So, therefore, it's perfect, it's a platonic idea, but never actually be a communist with a capital C, that's ridiculous, never actually be a Marxist-Leninist, unironically, that's ridiculous.

So like that's their general psychopathology and symptom.

And I hate it.

I do hate it.

I have a really violent hatred toward it.

I'm not gonna lie.

When I say violent hatred, I just mean intense hatred.

Because I find it so fundamentally fucking corrupt and disgusting.

And it doesn't belong in America, which is supposed to be a country founded on principles of honest, honest work.

Honesty, simplicity.

These are real American virtues.

They have brought some disgusting, filthy European corruption.

that I fucking hate.

I hate it.

I really passionately hate it.

It burns inside of me how much I fucking hate them and their disgusting, disgusting position of falsehood and hypocrisy.

If you're going to be talking about communism, be a communist.

Actually fucking be one.

If you're gonna praise Stalin, be like Stalin.

Don't keep it at as a distance as some illusory form of leverage that you use in your squabbles with fellow Democrats that are slightly to the right of you.

Fucking be it or don't be it.

But this disgusting and unprincipled position

That they have, I just fucking hate it.

It's not about purity, it's not about being pure.

None of us are pure, but we're honest about what we are.

We're communists, we're Marxist-Leninists.

What that actually amounts to, of course, needs to compromise with not even compromise, it needs to reflect reality itself.

But Marxism has always been based in realism.

I don't like ideological

hypocrisy.

It's like we are communists, so we're in a communist party.

Oh, but we're not ready for communism.

Then you're not fucking ready to call yourself a communist.

You're either a communist or you're not.

You're either a Marxist or you're not.

Stop saying the world isn't ready for something that you claim is true.

If you don't think the world is ready for it,

Then you're not ready for it either because you're also part of the world, you fucking moron.

I hate this disgusting and you know what I hate is because they they indulge in the sub the subversion of it like like again the spoiled brat daughter who hates her dad but is like spending all his money and like rebelling against her father they've created DSA as this like oh we don't take Michael Harrington seriously he's fuck you though What you're just you're like a spoiled brat that's like rebelling against her father.

Well, if you if you're about it then be about it if you're about it then be about it.

I fucking hate corruption.

I hate corruption.

I hate corruption and the corruption that I'm talking about here actually reflects their class position because this is the same corruption that defines the existence of the professional managerials.

It's corruption.

It's pure corruption.

It's literally what I told you: that psychopathology, that's how they are to their parents.

They hate their parents, but they rely on their parents.

You know, they hate the system, but they fucking rely on the system.

And when I say the system, I'm not talking about just having an iPhone, I'm talking about being a career-climbing parasite within the imperialist hegemony.

I'm talking about not willing to actually stand on your beliefs in public with your face saying Stalin is good because it's going to compromise your prospects of being the manager of the interpretive dance corporation at Disney or something.

That's what I'm fucking talking about.

And yeah, we're so subversive.

These DSA people have become showrunners on HBO and writers on HBO.

You know, I watched The Last of Us and I saw like the lady and the like, yeah, we're communists.

We live in a commune.

Aztec, appreciate you, brother.

And it's like, you know, that was a DSA writer.

I saw the trailer for the Saints Roll game, and they're like, yeah, we're anti-capitalists.

And I'm like, yeah, I know you're in the DSA and you think you're like doing Takia.

And you're like, yeah, we're still working for the corporation, but we're fuck this corruption.

I hate it.

You understand my hatred now?

Do you guys get it?

Like, I fucking hate corruption so much.

I really hate it.

I really fucking hate it.

You are a prostitute.

I don't know what else to say.

You're a prostitute.

In the same way that a prostitute has the freedom and autonomy to mock their clients and laugh at them behind in private, that's what you're doing.

That's what you're doing to the imperialist hegemony and to the democratic socialist organization itself.

But you're not free.

You are what you do, not how you subject.

This is why I hate DSA, because you are what you do.

You're not how you subjectively interpret what you do.

You are what you do.

You're not your subjective experience.

You are what you do.

If you're in the DSA, you are in a CIA anti-communist organization.

That you subjectively interpret your presence in that organization as somehow, no, it's gonna become it's gonna it's we just need more stages and then it's gonna become Mao.

That's your subjective interpretation, right?

But that's not actually what you are.

You're not your subjective a prostitute if a

I don't want to be vulgar.

I don't w how do I explain this?

I'll do the opposite thing.

If you're a man having sex with a 700-pound woman, but you're envisioning her as like Nikki Minaj, I don't know, that's so specific.

Why Nikki Minaj?

She's kind of.

Ice Spice also kind of got a little too skinny.

What's a good example?

If you're a man having sex with a nine hundred pound woman

But you are imagining her as um

Who's that woman from Wild Wild West?

Selma Hayek.

You're imagining her as Selma Hayek at her peak?

That may be your subjective

Um, fantasy, but you are having sexual intercourse with a nine hundred pound woman.

So, uh that and and the reverse, the reverse as well.

For both, you know?

You can pretend this is why, you know, what's disgusting is that the DSA, you know how they promote sex work?

That's literally their take.

It's like we're connecting so many dots, aren't we?

They're like, yeah.

Um,

Sex workers are being are radically autonomous because they are allowed to subjectively have so much freedom to define their experiences.

But their experience is, in my opinion, their experience is.

complete degradation.

Their experiences complete dehumanization.

That's what their experience is.

You can subjectively respond to that experience however you want.

Why don't you just be fucking honest and sober about what it actually is?

And that is the metaphor I have for the DSA as an organization.

I'm just disgusted about the corruption.

Do you guys understand what I mean about corruption?

Corruption?

I'm not sitting here grandstanding pretending I'm such a pure person, but.

I am not a snivelling, fucking, snickering, you know.

Mm-hmm.

Rat that's indulging in this false sense of subversion.

And oh, we're being naughty, and we're not living.

Uh-huh, we're doing it.

It's like, no, you know, we're very imperfect.

Of course, I'm an imperfect human being, but it's like, I try my best.

I'm trying my best to be a chairman for this party.

I'm trying my best to do what's right for the Communist Party.

I'm trying my best to do what's right for the cause of Marxism, for the cause of communism.

I really do believe in this, and I would take a bullet for Lenin.

I mean that.

I know Lennon is gone from a hundred years ago, but I te I would take a bullet for his cause.

If Lenin was resurrected and gave me the order,

To carry out any mission, I would do it.

If Lenin told me five hundred million people must go,

There's already five hundred million less people.

Go, I mean, is in like uh go to the um bowling alley, of course.

But uh

But but this is my belief, this is my sincere belief.

We're of course we're n reality is not reducible to our beliefs, I understand that, but we should be realistic and honest about the extent to which we are capable of appraising reality.

And that is what the DSA doesn't have.

There's no honesty.

There's no realism.

It's just corruption and corruption.

Corruption after corruption.

In any case, um that is uh part one, right?

Now

We'll go back to the Democratic Party, because that's a really interesting discussion to talk about, Democrats versus MAGA.

But uh why am I worried about DSA now?

I'm not worried the DSA is going to become like a left-wing, you know, powerful left-wing radical organization.

I'm worried that

It alone seems to be to have provided the skeleton and basis for a fascist movement in this country.

Yeah, I sound crazy, I don't care.

Marxism is not based in things making sense on the political spectrum for ideology.

I'm sorry.

Uh Marxism is about the class basis of different kinds of phenomena and um the way I can see the way I see it right now is that the DSA is primed to take the lion's share of organizing the lumpen and the declassed PMC before we have a workers movement.

And so I don't want to compete with the DSA and fill my ranks with potential DSA recruits.

I actually think we need to make it a mission of ours within the next four years at least to do the best we can to disperse the just break them as an organization, disperse them.

The lumpenized PMC should not have an organ.

An organ, an organization.

We should deprive them of that power within the class struggle.

Because that organ.

Very easily becomes an organ of fascism and the repression and suppression of workers' movements.

Now for th some of you saying that um

You know, uh someone said, well, some DSA people came and they helped with my trade union.

And so on.

Well

It's very cold and cruel that I'm thinking in this way, but I'm not thinking in terms of individuals, sir, I'm thinking in terms of demographics.

The class basis of the DSA is the same class basis as fascism.

The mass base, I should rather say.

The reasoning the reason people join D S A is not

to go down to the working classes, because that requires a radical selflessness, where you sacrifice your own immediate interests,

uh for the sake of reaching others.

Uh something also I'm proud of when it comes to the ACP is that the DSA is self-indulgent.

It's very self-fulfilling.

It's very like um self-affirming, right?

They even redefine the meaning of working class so that office workers are fucking workers now.

Anyway, um

Uh I'm sure Hassan redefines it so that streamers are workers too.

Right, so that it's very it's there's no notion of like selflessness, communist militancy, selflessness and stuff.

But you know, something I'm proud of of uh the ACP is um

We are eighty percent blue collar workers.

Because working class people who work

on a job site with manually, by the way, with their hands, they're already collectivistic.

Because why?

Because in a fucking factory or in a construction site or anywhere else, you have to work as a team

Doesn't matter what your fucking feelings are, doesn't matter how you feel, doesn't matter how what your subjective interpretation is, doesn't matter whatever the fuck we're talking about, you need to get the job done, and and and the criterion that determines whether the job is done or not is objective and rooted in natural laws.

Like, we gotta fucking lay the foundation for this house.

It's going to get done, or it's not going to get done.

And we have to work together to do it, right?

So if you're an actual worker.

You don't need me to instill collectivism in you.

You probably already have it.

Um

You know, but it's not the same.

Um.

as it was a hundred years ago.

In Lenin's time,

uh working class people could not be the the party cadre.

By and large, it was an exception.

Lenin wrote about it.

He says largely the bourgeois intelligentsia

is gonna you know have to be the base, the intelligentsia.

for party membership, you know, the the party rank and file, uh Lenin was against opening it up to working masses.

Because you have to be extremely educated and trained and dedicated.

And for Lenin, it was very simple.

Workers don't have time.

They don't have time.

So, how can they be class conscious fighters of the proletariat when they don't have time?

And you know, that disconnect was always a problem in communist parties.

Now there's wisdom to that disconnect.

The wisdom is the simple fact that

You know, class con uh being a class conscious fighter for the proletariat and the proletarian class position is not a personal position.

So that's wisdom there, you know.

I mean, uh I am personally not

Uh a blue collar worker.

But to the extent that I can properly represent blue collar workers, I represent their position.

Uh so that's true for Marx and Lenin and so on.

But the twenty first century is different and this is why it's kind of beautiful.

Workers do have the time now, and they have access to the information that they need to become educated.

And that's because of technology.

Technology has undercut and undermined glasses wearers and bureaucrats.

That's the fucking beauty of technology.

Now workers can be cadre.

Now workers can be advanced communists.

Workers don't need to listen to academics.

Not a dig at Carlos, by the way, he's great.

But as an institutional phenomenon, workers do not need

to listen to

Um

People that came from bourgeois institutions.

Because of technology, because of technology, because of the decentralization of information.

And that is so fucking p the biggest friend of the worker is technology.

People talk about automation.

But the negative effects of automation with respect to labor

Um, there's tried and tested experience, but the main automation that's being caused by the age of AI are the class enemies of the proletariat, you know, writers and TV show script writers and digital artists, and that is a friend of the world.

Now, workers have the time to be $500 million budget Hollywood film directors in five years.

Your average worker at a factory is going to be able to produce Transformers films using AI technology, and that's fucking beautiful that workers now have the ability to partake.

In the production of culture and information, and they never were before.

And it, yeah, it makes them less dependent on the experts.

Artisans are being destroyed.

Worse, you know, because these artisans at least maybe they're weaving with their hands or something.

These are people sitting on a desk at HR departments just enforcing their will.

Even video games are going to be made by AI.

Give it about 10, 20 years, maybe less.

Video games will be made by AI.

And and and guys, think about this for a second, where does DSA stand with respect to this phenomena, which is just going to keep accelerating?

DSA seems really upset about AI.

And we have a word for that in Marxism, it's called reactionary.

The DSA hasn't done enough yet to justify a war, all right?

But think about where I'm coming from.

Can you see the writing on the wall of where this is going to lead to?

Like, this is a preemptive action that I'm suggesting we take.

Kill Hitler before Hitler jumps onto the scene.

It's like baby Hitler.

DSA is Baby Hitler.

Are you gonna kill Baby Hitler or let them live?

Not kill literally, but metaphorically, of course.

Like, I see the writing on the wall.

I see that the primary source of opposition to the ACP, the demographic source, is being organized by the DSA.

And we should disperse and crush their organization before it mutates in ways that will be much more or worse for us.

And we should do this simultaneously while we strengthen our own ranks and draw from the working classes, which is what we're doing.

And toward that end, by the way.

A lot needs to be done.

For us to build institutions, right?

We can't recruit from universities.

We can't recruit from.

You know, uh, Amnesty International or whatever.

But, like, you know where we can recruit, guys?

We can recruit from community colleges, we can recruit from trade schools.

We can recruit in middle America.

From

Less, you know, trendy and less popular, but places that are sources of congregation for.

our demographic base, uh class base,

And typically, a party doesn't recruit the class, the proletarian class.

But remember my theory of the mecca proletariat, where today's proletariat has a mech.

The mech represents the decentralization of technology and the means of production, the tools that proletarians have that compound their labor, right?

That was the idea.

So we're living in a new era where, yeah, we can recruit young welders and tradesmen and people like that.

They would make fine additions to our party.

Because they have free time to be in our party.

They lack social connections a lot of the time.

They're very isolated.

And our people are out there, guys.

I feel like a lot of these guys are going home and they're playing video games and they're lonely and they're you know they're they're just by themselves and they're isolated.

And you know, our people are out there and we got to reach them.

And we need to do it fast because a war is coming, comrades.

A war is coming.

And we're going to need the might of the sleeping giant that is the working class to confront this fascist enemy.

Now, how does all this relate?

To the uh

How does this all relate to the um

To Trump.

Well, not a lot.

I don't think Trump is going to be Mussolini, I think he's going to be Biden.

Biden was a corpse who was President.

I think Trump will be a corpse who's President.

I I think Trump's weakness will become very evident.

Uh it

Throughout his administration, people are just going to see he's not in control.

And why do I know this for a fact?

Because

I know this for a fact.

Because later in Trump's administration, QAnon created the delusion to trust the plan.

That Trump had a secret plan, and that the reason he was betraying Mago was because it was all 4D chess.

I don't think that delusion is going to survive another four years.

I think people are going to realize Trump is just like Biden.

He's not really in control.

At all.

And you know, uh

That's just the fact of the matter.

So um uh this thing I wanted to say about Democrats, by the way, how they're robotic.

Didn't you find it intriguing when you watch Democratic Party campaign ads, local and uh national?

The recurring theme you'll notice is that

They look like skin walkers trying to replicate Maga.

And it came off so like fake and inauthentic, where they're like

My name is Bob Hillman, and we want a tough border.

Like they would say shit like that, and it's like clearly this is coming from a laboratory of experts who were scanning the data, scanning the data.

Okay, so we've scanned the data, and okay, to win a lot of Trump's MAGA base, a lot of the reason Trump is popular is because of the immigration issue.

So we need to change our like it was so robotic.

That's what I'm trying to say.

It was robotic.

It was robotic, it was uncanny, it was like aliens from outer space trying to be human.

The famous Mark Zuckerberg is a robot or a reptile meme.

Like, that is the Democratic Party, that is what they are.

Fundamentally, that is what they are.

Kamala Harris is a robot, that is not her real personality.

Everything she has, it's all like staged, you know.

And that is, but why are the Democrats like that?

Because they represent this like total technocracy, like expert rule kind of subjectivism.

the purity of subjectivism, like New Deal social engineering, uh gone wrong, right?

And um that's the Democratic Party, but there's an uncanny and see the Democratic Party is radically

Dehumanizing.

They're radically anti-humanistic, right?

And that really resonates with.

neo Nazism and Fascism.

Put it this way, the difference between a Democrat and a fascist is that Democrats pretend to have a heart and be empathetic.

But both Democrats and Fascists agree about the same reality.

They share the same metaphysical outlook, they just disagree in terms of how to respond to it.

They both believe in the force from Star Wars

But they just have different philosophies about but they believe in the same reality.

Like Democrats are cynics.

They believe in race realism.

They just think that it's hurtful.

Um Democrats believe that, you know, Slavs are the inferior race and they believe in all of that, but they just think that it's hurtful and it's mean and they want to be loving and nice.

So they avoid it.

But they do believe it.

They believe in the same things neo-Nazis believe.

And it's like the reason

The social fascists, you know, the liberal leftists, the reason they constantly are putting swastikas on us, why are you putting swastikas on us?

You know, the swastikas are really like naked, ugly, like pornographic.

Why are you throwing swastikas on us?

Swastikas are disgusting.

They inspire revulsion and shock in normal people.

Why are you throwing that on us so much?

Because they're projecting.

Because something in them wants reality to be the swastika.

Like they agree with neo-Nazis about Nazism representing the truth.

They just don't like the truth subjectively.

And so they that's their anti-fascism.

It's not a disagreement as it pertains to objective reality.

They believe so strongly that Nazism is true that when Haas al-Deen comes forward and just starts telling the naked truth, they interpret that to mean an endorsement of Nazism, because they deep down believe that Nazis are telling the truth.

They think that they just have a filter because of their subjective morality, but ultimately the reality that they believe in is the same one Nazis believe in.

So when you insist upon being truthful and objective and authentic, they accuse you of being a Nazi.

Why are they saying Trump is Hitler?

Trump is Hitler.

Was there, did that ever come from MAGA?

No, it was the Democrats.

They created this ugly Hitlerite neo-Hitlerite idea.

They breathed new life into it.

I mean, Trump didn't need to be interpreted as far right or Hitler.

It that was liberals who did that.

Why did they do that?

Because deep down they're tempted by Nazism and they believe in it themselves.

And this, you know, it's like this.

Feels like it's crazy.

Until you look at what happened in Ukraine.

And then you look at what happened in Ukraine and you're like, wow.

Wow.

You look at what happened in Ukraine and you're like, yeah.

No, yeah, what I'm talking about is very much grounded in reality.

Like it's not far off at all that these same people would eventually find themselves on the same team and the same side as neo Nazis because it's happened before.

And it's starting to ha Did you guys notice that all neo-Nazism on X at least is increasingly pro-NATO and anti-Russia?

Openly pro NATO.

That didn't used to be the case before Richard Spencer.

Then Richard Spencer was fringe, and most of them still had this delusion that Russia was on their side or something.

And then finally, now it's like they're fully endorsing NATO now.

I've seen neo-Nazis complain about J.D.

Vance's threat.

D harm NATO.

What about Groipers?

The Groupers are powerless.

Because they don't and will never be capable of building institutions.

To build institutions you have to be a Marxist.

But here's the problem.

You know who could legitimate Groupers?

The DSA.

If Groupers started joining DSA,

and uniting with them

Uh

It seems crazy that this would ever happen now, but thinking objectively in terms of the long term, the class similarities.

Yeah, Groipers can be empowered by the Imperialist State if they join the DSA.

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

Groipers wouldn't use their pronouns.

Uh

You'd be surprised.

You'd be surprised.

The DSA would probably rebrand.

Oh, yeah, no, no, yeah, it would.

But what I'm saying assumes that that would happen, of course.

But um

When I say a pre emptive strike to disperse and shatter their organization, there won't be an organization to rebrand if we're successful.

We'll just shatter and disperse them to the wind, so they will be alone and isolated and powerless.

So we are going to uh yeah, White Unity D S A.

Yeah.

There would have been no Nazism if Communists destroyed social democracy after nineteen seventeen.

If German social democracy was successfully defeated by Communists, there would have been no Hitler or Nazis.

And the DSA is worse than the Social Democrats in Germany were after nineteen seventeen.

Much worse.

I I I'm also gonna propose another thing.

I could also be overestimating the hype.

Um the DSA could just die down.

Could just die down.

and become irrelevant, and that this recent thing is just not gonna last.

But uh where the Democrats it's so unpredictable where the Democrats are gonna go now.

Because I genuinely think a lot of the left leftists that are interpreting the defeat of the Democratic Party in the way that they are, they're like the problem with the Democrats is that they were trying too hard to be MAGA instead of AOC, but they don't realize AOC style politics doesn't work in this country.

It doesn't fucking work.

Um straight up, it doesn't work.

Politics is either muscular or it's not mass politics.

You can have a pussy bitch politics if you're a dictator who not only a dictator, a severely unpopular dictator.

Then you can be a fucking bitch and pussy.

Because you don't have to care about what anyone thinks.

But if you need if you're winning on the basis of elections, you have to be muscular.

Trying to run a mayoral candidate in NYC.

I don't remember them talking about the D S A.

Look, brother, I'm not saying that they're literally talking about the DSA right now.

I'm making an objective prediction sorry, an objective analysis and inferring a long-term prediction.

It hasn't come to pass yet.

All right.

Clearly, it hasn't happened yet.

I'm just saying.

What future is the far right going to have without the mass base and institutional support?

Think about this.

You know, how are they going to grow?

How are they going to.

I expected.

Once

Fuck this.

I'm so fucking sick of kick.

Twos

Tunes.

Alright, we're back at twos.

Right.

No, we're not.

Alright, it's like delayed by thirty seconds.

Alright.

Anyway, um

Thinking about it in the long term.

D S A uh

They are social fascists, and uh strategically, I think the smart thing right now is um

Breaking them.

As a preemptive uh action.

Preemptive.

But what is the basis of this declaration of war formally?

Formally speaking, we're going to war with the DSA because of their relentless um

uh their relentless uh lying and attacks on our party.

So that's why.

If they leave us alone, we'll leave them alone.

But they're not gonna leave us alone.

So preemptively we're gonna liquidate and wipe them out so that we won't have this threat constantly on our fucking backs attacking us.

The D-classed PMC might be swayed by the high-tech success of China.

Uh weekend, here's the issue.

I think that those people will falsely interpret China's existence.

They're basically gonna say look at all of the far-right lies about China, not far-right, the populist right lies about China, that it's a evil technocracy ruled by and then they're gonna be like, Yeah, that's based, which is the same thing that I described earlier as far as corruption.

China is also a populistic country that is imbued with a popular, meaningful character.

Xi Jinping is a leader, he's not a robot, he's a leader.

And China's political state is not based in pure data, it's based in a very specific passion for China's existence and its history, and it's the one China policy, and it's non-negotiable.

So the problem with the technocratic sympathies with China that some leftists who wear glasses had is that they are f they're leaving they um they're representing China in a way that ignore that only that is one-sided.

It ignores the human side of China, it ignores the populistic side of China, it ignores the side of China that is like that that has a subjective side in a sense, where you know it's not just pure rule by data, it's also rule according to the uh a specific and determinate character of the whole people and the country and history itself and the development of history and the lofty ideas of communism and so on and so on.

It's dialectical, you know, it's the dialectical aspect that they're missing.

Alright guys.

Think we're gonna um

We're going to end the stream because it's late and I I I've kept you up longer than I intended to, frankly.

I should start sitting like this.

Anyway, guys, I hope you understand better.

Um my thoughts on the striking the DSA before they become a bigger problem for us than they already are.

Um

Iron Rose!

Holy shit, thank you, brother.

I'm glad I didn't end the stream.

Iron Rose.

Thank you, brother.

Stralistani!

Listen, I don't mean to be like this, but if you plan on gifting subs, do it now so I can shout you out, 'cause what I fucking hate is when I end the stream and you guys gift subs and then I feel like shit 'cause I didn't thank you.

So

twenty nineteen.

Ah, the stream is delayed anyway.

What an incredible grifting tactic.

This is like uh.

Someone is still asking if you play Hoi for.

Ah, I've never played Hoi 4 in my life.

And I've only learned about what that is because I started interacting with weirdos on the internet.

Thank you, Trevali, appreciate it.

Alright, Truvaldi's the last call before the stream ends.

Goodbye, guys.

I'll see you.