Infrared vs Cheshire Cat | Politically Provoked Debate
2021-08-04
Tags:
""
all right so i'm your left wing host
brittany this is your right wing host
todd how are you
doing great brit how are you doing good
all right so yeah we started a little
bit late uh that was
that was on me but um we are going to be
debating
tonight a christian democracy versus
marxist socialism so let's bring on our
first
guest cat joshua kat how are you hello
i am doing well so yeah you want to
introduce yourself tell people where you
lie on the political spectrum
and where people can find you i guess
all right well i'm cheshire
cat i'm the most famous cat on discord
probably at the moment
i'm a christian democrat that is an
ideology that generally falls
center right we are pro-market but
pro-organized labor
or a pro-modern society but we also
don't forget our faith
um most people have referred to us as a
sort of
uh taking a christian view on ethics to
create a humane capitalist society
okay all right so next up we have you
know it's funny because
i wrote a tweet about um he is
the one person like that we've booked
the base for he doesn't even ask who
he's debating just
freaking comes and shows up um
how are you tonight haws um i'm good
i'm good i'm good and i'm ready to
rumble you know yeah you want to
introduce yourself tell people where you
lie on the political spectrum
and where people can find you amaha's
from the infrared show
um we're marxist leninists
uh simple as that
all right so we are going to start with
opening statements can be as little as
one minute no longer than five
about the topic and your stance after
that will open up the floor
uh for those of you watching if you want
to ask questions tag politically
provoked who your question is addressed
to
um ask them throughout the debate we'll
jot them down because there will be a
cut off at the end and once the cutoff
happens we will only accept super chats
so if you want your question read for
free get it in while you can
um after the q a we will go into closing
statements and final
thoughts so catboy you um you said you
have a bit of a long
you're probably gonna use your entire
time so why don't you get us started
with your opening statement
oh [Β __Β ] okay i'm going first all right
nervous
all right um let me just get to the
paper
uh all right so i guess i'll i'll take
my five minutes now
um in my opinion communism is an
ideology that is more often than not
forced on the people from those who
suffer under the luke
this boot of communism is justified
internally and externally
internally the communist finds its
justification in party dogma
the educating dictatorship is a turn
coined by
critiques of 20th century communism it
basically
explains an ideologically family which
sees its right to leadership
coming not by the consent of the
governed like i believe it should be
but internally by the perceived inherent
correctness of communist thought esri
zondetra is to lead the masses to a
revolution from above
whether they like it or not and
eventually when they can be trusted the
masses will finally have a say in it
externally communism is justified by a
series of failed promises and lies
the communist economy grows quicker than
any others this is a lie
the communist despot offers a better
life than any other
this is too a lie the communist promises
to be more peaceful than any other
also lie the communist promises to be
more careful manager
well in my own land of birth romania the
communist dictatorship failed to even
supply their own government-managed
breadlines with bread
it was a [Β __Β ] show in many debates such
as the one we are having
today i hear one argument i'm not
defending the entire soviet system or
any of its failings as a whole
i just have to admit that the centrally
planned economy
is more successful and it's a better
system
in my view this is a bad justification
as an empathetic man and as a christian
this seems heartless to me
ignoring human suffering in favor for
the good and efficient economy sounds
like something
your evil bourgeoisie should be doing
not anyone purporting to be for the
common people
luckily you aren't your only option
christian democracy not only offers a
better physical life but a healthier
spiritual one
we support markets but also humane labor
laws and trade unions to allow the
workers to advocate for themselves
not be dictated to by a party elite the
christian democrat looks to the future
without ignoring our heritage our past
and our faith and most importantly we
envision a modern
world with neither heartless
neoliberalism nor despotic communism
uh that's that's my opening statement
um so we were here to talk about
the difference between so-called social
market economy versus marxist socialism
as experienced by those who lived under
it
well to begin i just want to um
clear any uh worries you have i'm not
here to actually say
no i don't defend the soviet union but i
just defend some abstract idea no i do
defend the soviet union i defend the
soviet union
i defend the communist states and i
defend the legacy of 20th century
communism so rest assured i am here to
defend
uh communist states so let's get that
out of the way
the second thing is uh you mentioned a
whole lot of things about communists
lying uh well almost all of the lists
you gave were a combination of things
you made up in other words things they
didn't actually directly
promise uh in order to lie about in the
first place
and also uh things i don't think would
hold up to scrutiny when we would
interrogate them
one by one in terms of uh whether they
were in fact
lies it's interesting that you come from
romania
a country whose story is basically
defined by the fact
that uh upon leaving the com con
the communist uh economic
lock and becoming indebted because of
imf loans a country completely ravaged
by the imf by international capitalism
and romania to this day
remains uh extremely underdeveloped
relative to the rest of europe
joining the eu did not do much for the
romanian people and the romanian
infrastructure left behind
and which is almost entirely by the way
left over from the communist
era um so i wonder if you are just
waiting for christian democracy to come
make romania
have new infrastructure and actually
have new industry
because whatever system romania has now
has not been able to accomplish that
um that is true romania has been purpose
uh i would say permanently scarred
by the mismanagement of the communist
regime um
i would also say that while people
polled positively for shoshesku now
i think at least half or almost half of
the population does
people overwhelmingly poll even more
positively for the old monarch
a lot of people see the communist as
using the soviet union to
topple our top alarm monarch topple our
constitutional monarchy although i'm not
a constitutional monarchist
um and basically pull us into the listen
to the red block
uh against our will well that again
was only popular because he was one of
the only nationalist communist leaders
in romania well here's a flight of law
to your arguments is the fact that
people lived under czech that are still
alive today
right no one lived under the monarchy or
maybe some do but they're completely
tiny marginal part of the population so
the memory of this monarchy and the
memory of chichester
differ because there's actually lived
experience behind
people who lived under romanian
communism i i
have no doubt that romanians are
fervently nationalistic people and
may have you know pulled well for the
monarchy
and whatever but people are not doing
that because they recall life
under the monarchy they do it just
because of romanian nationalism
uh well to be fair he pulled more
popular than the communist government
throughout the
uh throughout the 50s 60s 70s and 80s
he's still more popular can you show me
that's why he was famously he's was
banned from entering
uh romania by the communist party
because they were afraid
if he came and started giving speeches
people would start getting uppity
no i find it interesting that there's
actually polling data for that
in the under communist rule would you do
you have a source you can reference
my i'm feeling stupid because i did
mention i'm from romania but romania is
one of the
few countries i didn't actually collect
data for that wasn't economic
um i do have a a list of some of the
more
more popular to talk about uh communist
nations going over uh soviet nostalgia
because i figured we would be talking
about that
a lot um the ones they do have my main
arguments are going to be uh
revolving around the czech republic and
east and west germany
um well that i have hold on i didn't
actually
prepare for anything regarding the czech
republic so let's confine it to germany
which is what the initial
topic well the chakra pub is going to be
should be pretty easy i know i would
understand that you don't want to talk
about the czech republic because
communists came in and invaded them no
it's because i didn't do any preparation
for the czech republic a country i don't
even have a lot of familiarity with
i do have more i i you wanted to debate
about germany and uh
no i said those are those are a number
of nations they have so um
of the nations that i do know about that
i've collected data for this includes
east germany poland
the czech republic slovakia hungary
lithuania
russia ukraine and bulgaria
only russia and you russians and
ukrainians
still overwhelmingly support the um
the the communist regime the exact um if
you wanted to give you the source
um the exact polling questions um
were they were pulled in two separate
things um whether they
uh let me bring this link into our
private chat so you can see it
um if that's dead or not um is
2019. um earlier earlier polls
from the 2000s which had a larger and
more proportion
of people who actually lived under
communist states in all the countries
you mentioned had a much higher
proportion of people who
uh said that life was good
under communism well then you should be
able to find me those sources but if
you're not going
i can find any source right now for east
germany yeah yeah so why don't you
if you can find them for all of this
country that'd be nice you can um you
can find as well
so what is the debate okay what's the
debate called what is the gift of the
debate topic
what is the title of yours you were
given the debate talk you agree yeah
what is it
debate between socialism and christian
democracy
now christian democracy is one of those
ideologies which helped
in european reconstruction after world
war ii and reconstruction after the fall
of the year so i need you to calm down
buddy
the title was rein
uh ryan capitalism versus marxian
socialism
as regards the people who lived under
them and those people
uh can only be german
germany east germany versus west germany
no when the debate topic when we met in
regards to the people living under them
i was talking more about you know
human rights and stuff of the people who
would be living under these systems
in the past and theoretically in the
future it's not that we're only allowed
to talk about the opinions of elderly
people and
from these post-regimes that's fine but
people who didn't live under these
states are not really qualified to have
given actual fair judgment of what life
was like
under them do you think that only people
who
happen to be citizens under a current
regime are allowed to speak on it and we
can't look at data
did i say that i said they're not
qualified to give an accurate
representation of what life was like
under it because they did not actually
live
under those states it's pretty simple uh
well we can look at things we can look
at
quantifiable things and judge it that
way we're not going i'm not going into
well
people were sad under this regime i'm
not talking about that
um so to continue with my statement in
only russians and ukrainians poll as
supporting um supporting the old
communist dictatorships
they are the only two countries that i
listed
where people both were people both and
these were two separate questions that
were act people did not support the move
to multi-party democracy
and they did not support the move to
liberal markets however in east germany
poland the czech republic slovakia
hungary lithuania
all people overwhelmingly supported the
move
to a multi-party democracy
and the move to a liberal markets the
only outliers
is that the only outlier was bulgaria
right your data's wrong you have
false data 38 percent of people in the
east see reunification as a success
as compared to a majority who don't um
to this day 57 percent of east germans
consider
uh themselves to be second-class
citizens within germany so your polling
data
is either inaccurate or it is not an
actual full and fair representation
that's not the same question i i also i
understand because there's different
goals
yeah east germans do feel left behind
because as most other communist states
there have been economically
ravaged by the communist party which is
the lie i've been able to catch this is
a lie
right i would say the entire history of
the world begs to differ
well okay here's here's the tough thing
about talking to you about this right
you're jumping all over europe and i
would like to address
each country separately like i can talk
to you about why east germany
had the history it did very easily
because
the top germany shut the [Β __Β ] up
shut the [Β __Β ] up stop [Β __Β ]
interrupting me shut the [Β __Β ] up
east germany was going to be the topic
of this debate you want to run from
germany to the czech republic to poland
to ukraine to russia
all over europe can you stop
globetrotting and focus in on uh
what we're actually supposed to be
trying to find where i said germany
would be the topic of this debate when
we agreed to the topic of this debate
it's about
whether ryan so-called the social market
economy whether it's the one that
existed in west germany
or the one that exists now in unified
germany
better than marx university can be said
to be
better than marxian socialism as regards
to the people who lived under it stay
the [Β __Β ]
on topic i don't think you're the one on
topic all right ryan capitalism is an
economic system that has been used all
across europe and latin america now from
germany to the czech republic to austria
to the nordic model
to peru which is also the most fastest
growing economy in latin america right
now okay
we didn't agree to just talk about east
germany about and only talk about the
opinions of
of some of certain uh part of the
population we're talking about
the benefits to a society as a whole so
which country do you consider ryan
capitalism so we can be clear about that
um i would say czech republic germany
austria denmark and peru to be people
following the
only two of those are former communist
states are
adjacent to communist nations i know
west germany was not a communist
state but only two of those countries
are relevant to the actual debate topic
uh no no because i could i could still
point out economic history from these
people we could look at
even in these in in lesser developed
places like peru example
how they're doing when did peru have a
communist state when did peru
have a marxian socialist state uh they i
don't believe they had a communist so
it's not relevant we just
don't talk about peru we can't talk
about it because they didn't have
[Β __Β ] communism it's very simple
well we're not only talking about states
who are communist and then changes to
not communists we're talking we describe
the czech republic system
as brian capitalism i'd like to know
where you're actually getting that idea
from uh they're a country that
broadly they have a free market model
which broadly sees the government as
the government's job as um going into
the economy and
not over and not over regulating it
really stepping in just to
improve um competition that's extremely
ambiguous
you when you're talking about the social
media there's more stuff broadly also
supports
uh organized labor not necessarily
connected to the state
denmark would also be another good
example where they don't have for
instance
state mandates on on wages they just let
the
they let the um the organized labor do
it
for themselves there's actually plenty
of countries that fall under that
extremely
unproductive useless and fully ambiguous
description
i see that you got your description of
the social market economy from wikipedia
which says
austria the czech republic germany peru
poland
the united kingdom and the united states
or the united kingdom
well i wouldn't i wouldn't add to the
united kingdom the united states or
poland into it so i guess i have a
different so how do you know peru
is this how where are you getting this
idea that all of these other countries
can be qui listen when someone says ryan
capitalism they're talking about germany
they're
talking about the country that the rhine
river is in now they're talking about
christian christian democracy had in had
influence throughout
all of western europe i agree but when
you're talking about a system of ryan
capitalism
you're talking about germany because in
contrast to those other countries
germany is where uh christian democracy
actually took hold and was able to form
new institutions after world war ii and
so on and so on
that implemented uh its ideas
so i don't know where you're getting
this idea that countries like peru
can be qualified because it's only the
capitalism that people on the rhine use
it's called that because it was an
economic theory that was developed in
germany at first
under the christian democrats and has
been expanded throughout the rest of
europe and parts of latin america now
i also like to talk about how has it
been expanded other nations
[Music]
i'm a south american unificationist i
think that america should take more
control and take more of an interest i
don't care about your
ridiculous and bizarre ideas about latin
america would you call singapore and
south korea
ryan capitalist states they also have a
special connection between the state and
uh
unions and so on i mean most advanced
developed states
fall under the label of so-called ryan
capitalism as you've defined it
if you don't know i would say that's a
point in my favor that all these great
developed states no it's not
because there's no there's no need to
call it ryan capitalism or christian
democracy since
christian democracy and ryan capitalism
is entirely inessential no
south korea and singapore don't call
themselves
ryan capitalism so when you talk about
ryan
when you talk about ryan capitalism
you're talking about germany
uh you know if it makes if it makes you
feel better i'll just use social
capitalism then or you know what
you're a commie i'll give you a laugh we
can call it capitalism with a human face
you should know it i actually don't care
what you call it you can call it social
capitalism but if you want to change the
debate to
social capitalism the scope of this
debate is going to be
much more extensive than it was going to
be initially i even have to change my
stream title so it's not
actually about germany it's about the
entire globe
and the world over so we have to
actually cover well it's more about
western and north nordic europe i think
probably okay let's be let's be very
clear where do you want to confine
this specific debate no if it makes you
you know we can confine it um i want to
specifically talk about
czech republic as is where i i would
really like to talk about
uh japan would be another reason not
necessarily just for for
um you say japan uh well yeah well that
depends if we get into a conversation
about the soviet union's
market growth they want to bring up
japan because japan has grew
yeah because yeah that's what other
industries it's the only country that
ever grew faster than the soviet well no
no that's not true japan is the only
country that grew faster
and consistently and also had a higher
gdp per capita than the soviet union
there are a lot of other countries
had faster growth rates so if the one
except
portugal ireland all of western europe
all of northern europe
had faster what's the time what's the
time period you're talking about
um this would be 1970s this would be
yeah pre-19s
from like the 60s to the 70s yeah we all
know there was a present we all know
about the brezhnev stagnation so that
doesn't really count the soviet union
shut the [Β __Β ] up you said it was a lie
when communists stated that they had the
highest growth in the world
where for a long time the soviet union
did have the highest [Β __Β ] growth
it's until the brezhnev stagnation that
that shows they didn't have the highest
[Β __Β ] growth either
until the brezhnev stagnation yes no no
no they didn't have the highest [Β __Β ]
growth
even though they named two countries
that had higher growth before the
president of stagnation go ahead
uh let's see spain ireland and japan
no it didn't yes it doesn't only give
you a source i can give you a source
go ahead give me the source uh let's see
this should yeah here it is so these
actually have some really fancy colored
graphs you can look at where's the
source
i again i understand that it's in the pm
can i drop images in there
yeah this is the same [Β __Β ] source we
talked about in the last debate if you
actually read this correctly you didn't
i don't know what you didn't
read the [Β __Β ] graphs correctly this
little thing that i'm showing on stream
that's showing portugal spain all these
countries
this is not actually talking about the
rate of growth if you actually
read this correctly you're going to find
that the soviet union was higher
than everyone except japan here's the
actual relevant chart i'm showing it
right now on stream
i can pull it up if you want um
it's right here but it's it's you just
have to control that
but what about robert allen's from farm
to factory what if we consider the ussr
starting with stalin it's right here
and this is 28 to 70. so that's even
after
you're probably looking wait you're are
you looking at the gdp per capita
because those are a list of nations that
had a higher gdp per capita at times but
yeah i am also it's not measuring the
rate of growth
look your source says it then we find
the ussr was the
fastest growing economy except for japan
it's ad verbatim
on one of the on one of the upper graphs
gdp
growth this is a rate of growth over
time from
the 30s to the 90s
you don't know how to [Β __Β ] read
graphs you're so stupid holy [Β __Β ]
that is not the rate of growth
you see growth over time here on well
that's not the rate
it's not actually showing you do you
understand math
there's a difference between showing gdp
growth and showing the rate of growth
your own [Β __Β ] source
admits that from 28 to 70 the ussr was
the fastest growing economy except for
japan
oh i i understand the problem here all
right so when i'm saying growth over
time
yeah all right so you're right the
soviet union at certain at one period of
history had the
fastest growing economy the bulk of its
history not one period of its history
for the bulk of its history
no not for the bulk of it yes it lasted
70 years and from 28 to 70
it had the highest growth in the future
it didn't have the highest it didn't
have the highest growth until after
world war ii
first of all listen your
graph your own source admits that from
1928
to 1970 it had the highest growth except
for japan that's your source the one you
shared
right so again so you'd be saying that
the soviet union didn't have the highest
growth but again
this
well japan is growth tiny [Β __Β ]
country with like not even
a torture of the night of the natural
resources or the population
so what japan had a huge head start over
the [Β __Β ] ussr
japan during the meiji restoration in
japan's hyper industrialization yes it
is
so you're telling me that the [Β __Β ]
monarchist japan had a better system of
growth in
your system do you think that's good
that's did i say it had a better system
of growth
you just said you're saying it's not
fair we're comparing like the major i
don't know i know you don't understand
logic
so there's two different claims right
one is that it actually did have more
growth and the other is that it had a
better system of growth
if you if i were to concede to you that
it had a better system of growth
i would be saying that japan grew more
than the ussr
because of its system but i'm not
arguing that it grew
because why do you think it grew if not
because of the system that it had
considering that i'll tell you why
i will tell you why because japan
combined
a heavily state commanded or intervened
level
of uh economic control for the specific
purpose of actually achieving those
growth rates plus it had
nearly unlimited access to foreign
capital and foreign investment
so combining those two yes you're going
to have huge rates of growth
i would say that capitalist investment
is really good however japan
i would say actually deregulated its
economy
all right it came out of okay it came
out no let me finish it came out of its
isolationist period the state stopped
blocking people from investing
the state stopped people that state got
did away with its class system which
allowed merchants
and middle class please let's not get
into the meiji restoration you're just
wasting time i get it there's another
one
wait you brought it up i understand that
you want to get off no no because they
couldn't realize
that dude dude you need to [Β __Β ]
walk back what you just said and i'll
read it to you carefully
what i just said was that japan during
the period of the ussr's growth
had a heavy-handed state-led economy
which is true and you said well
technically during the meiji restoration
like
80 years before in the [Β __Β ] 1800s
they actually opened up
we don't want to get into the [Β __Β ]
history of feudal japan and samurais and
[Β __Β ] dude
restoration just [Β __Β ] stay on topic
for no reason we don't have we don't
have to talk about samurais and ninjas
dude we don't
we're not we're first off you what you
agreed it was meiji recipe
restoration period onward that's post
feudal japan we're not even talking
about samurais
because that was the that was the
opening of its industrialization
and obviously yes it opened up to the
world and it broke down all of its
feudal traditions and whatever but it
was a still
very state heavy-handed uh industrial
economic growth
that was an explosion for private for
yeah it was a huge private yeah
i'm not saying it was
either you're saying it was heavy-handed
by the state yes it was it was
objectively there was a heavy-handed
statement
intervention in the economy the united
states yes but japan did the best
compared to every country no not
compared to every country yes compared
to almost
any country in europe economy they
allowed they stopped with the [Β __Β ]
classes and they stopped with the weird
regulations how you could only
trade in a couple of listings that's
feudal japan it's not [Β __Β ] relevant
okay japan compared to europe had a very
heavy-handed state intervention in its
economy that is a [Β __Β ] fact
no one who actually argues in good faith
and doesn't want to waste people's time
for no [Β __Β ] reason
will argue against that fact yeah of
course the state didn't own
the enterprise i'm not saying they owned
i'm saying you say the state
intervention can you let me finish my
point you know
after the state stopped being so
interventional in my
system they allowed for more privacy one
gives a [Β __Β ] about this fake
dichotomy you're creating between you so
you think my actual argument here is
that oh yeah
state is good letting go is bad i'm not
even
[Β __Β ] saying that the reason i
mentioned it had heavy-handed state
intervention wasn't because i was trying
to make a ideological point about
socialism
but because of the fact that the
japanese state
made it its actual intentional and
specific explicit goal to industrialize
the country
ergo it had very high rates especially
when you
couple that with access almost near
unlimited access to foreign capital and
being able to take
advantage of those global uh
differentials in um
in capital okay it's it's a really
simple point but you decided to talk
about ninjas and samurais instead
i didn't really you were the only one
who was said ninjas and samurais yeah
because you're talking about [Β __Β ]
feudal japan in the way that
well i'm not seeing i want to talk about
japan post world war ii
uh there's this famous anecdote where
there's so many what you want to talk
about conservative party
won its elections in japan for the prime
ministership um
by promising that they would double and
they would double wages
within 20 years and they managed to do
it within like eight they managed to
double
the wages of the average japanese system
okay i'm gonna
okay so you wanna look at japan no the
conservative party promised something
and with magic
fairy pixie dust it actually
accomplished it well no with capitalist
investment
here's the thing here's what you're
missing okay and this is what happens
when you actually debate someone who
knows about history
when you actually look at the biggest
shut the [Β __Β ]
up shut your [Β __Β ] mouth you don't
even have a [Β __Β ] cam
up and you're [Β __Β ] disrespecting me
like this show your face dude
you want to [Β __Β ] interrupt me show
your [Β __Β ] face
second of all with your that wealth
shut the [Β __Β ] up that wealth and
prosperity you're talking about after
world war
ii was the result of the
american-designed bretton woods system
and it was a global system with
unlimited access to the world's
resources the world's
capital the world's industrial uh build
up and especially america's
uh foreign capital investment everyone
prospered from that [Β __Β ] system
uh who was it was in doubt right
everyone did prosper from capital
shut the [Β __Β ] up because that was most
of the world
that was mostly clearly not all of the
world because africa
middle east were you need to understand
something
do i yes you do what do i need to
understand
industrial is it countries that have the
burden of industrializing themselves
from scratch without being able to take
advantage of differentials in capital um
concentration globally they're going to
have
objectively a harder time than countries
that can actually participate and take
advantage of those differentials in
other words
surpluses produced by uh initial
um concentrations of capital can be used
to invest in other countries other
countries can benefit from those
investments and on and on
the process goes so the question is
why wasn't the soviet union able to
acquire foreign investment no why
weren't they able to invest in their
other companies
the soviet union had to industrialize
itself
from scratch it couldn't take advantage
of foreign capital in the ways
that the countries you're talking about
could well why didn't they the soviet
union specifically blocked the eastern
poland
entering the system and taking loans
from the west
because virgil poland czechoslovakia
all of these nations wanted to get
investment from the united states and
from the west
the soviet union told them not to
otherwise they would be kicked out of
the red block keep talking keep talking
keep talking you want to talk more
why are you so pissy about this holy
[Β __Β ] these are so [Β __Β ] annoying
i'm sorry you don't know how to shut
your mouth straight economies
i didn't even hear anything you said
because you interrupted me i turned you
what tuned you out
and that's what's going to keep
happening the soviet union didn't
acquire
foreign capital investment because a
it couldn't because it was politically
encircled and for political reasons
excluded from the world market
the second reason is the soviet union
wanted to have
national sovereignty and
the states that would have invested in
the soviet union
would not have done so under those terms
and conditions
so the soviet union did have the burden
of industrializing its economy
from scratch so it could retain actual
sovereignty and actual independence
and basically have its own source of
industrialization rather than taking
advantage of the
prior and precedent forms of
industrialization now there's countries
like china that went
down a different path and took advantage
of the prior forms of industrialization
that happened in the west and
they used that to industrialize
themselves after deng's reforms
but the soviet union was not in a
position to do anything like that at
that time so the soviet union had to
carry that burden itself
are you done can you put your thumb in
your mouth while i speak now
since you just [Β __Β ] disrespected me
go ahead all right okay um so
the the soviet union can blame itself
for not being able to take investment
because
during the reconstruction period for
four years after
the after the war america primarily and
the united kingdom basically had a no
questions asked policy where they would
give you
basically handle your state budgets for
four years no questions out you didn't
even need to be indebted to them
the soviet union specifically blocked
itself they refused to take part in it
and then they blocked um they blocked
every other eastern bloc nation from
taking part in these investments later
on as well
why what why would the soviet union
block all of these other nations who
weren't their own threatened them to
stop them from getting investments
because of some apparent sovereignty
that they would be losing
only to later on rip their own economic
their own industrialization out for them
to bring back to the soviet union and
invade the [Β __Β ] anyway
why does the soviet union care so much
about sovereignty if it's going to trips
around the rest of eastern europe and
[Β __Β ] invade people constantly
whenever they try and
liberalize them i don't think it's
because they cared about sovereignty
okay well there's three bullet points of
absolute stupidity that i just heard
the first one is that the soviet union
was pledged to some
unconditional principle of sovereignty
in the abstract
i never said that actually i said the
soviet union itself wanted to be
sovereign
the soviet union didn't care about the
sovereignty of other countries
which i'm going to contest that is
doesn't actually say anything
about my initial point that the soviet
union wanted its own
sovereign industrialization the second
bullet point of stupidity
is that if you think that the only
reason the soviet union exited bretton
woods is for some ideological or
irrational reason you just don't [Β __Β ]
know anything about bretton woods and
all of the strings that were attached to
the american global monetary system
soviet union didn't want to be part of
bretton woods or america's plans for the
world
because the soviet union didn't believe
that it was a fair
political division of power globally it
gave too much
political power to america and yes for
purposes of sovereignty
the soviet union did not want to enter
into it
as for the soviet union preventing all
of these other european countries
from entering it the actual political
relationship between
the soviet union as a center and the
communist parties that
took power in the eastern european
states is much more subtle than you're
trying to say is with the soviet union
directly commanding them obviously there
was a central will that was coming from
no it was not shut the [Β __Β ] up shut the
[Β __Β ] up
it wasn't shut you're lying first off
they invaded
hungary over market liberalization the
communist party of poland
shut the [Β __Β ] up can you mute this
[Β __Β ] literally the communist parties
of the eastern bloc
kept having to go back to moscow to get
permission every time they want to do it
i'm not gonna let you say anything the
audience doesn't [Β __Β ] hear anything
you're saying
shut your [Β __Β ] mouth
when it came when it came to um
there's two another two bullet points of
stupidity how did
the communist parties seize power in um
europe obviously it was because of world
war ii that's no one's contest
no that was not true the communist
parties and first of in many countries
they literally just
did a coup threatening the democratic
establishments of the countries
that if they did not give the communist
party's undue government power
the soviet union would invade them they
did the coup in check
no this is absolutely you're running
away from the debate you're running away
from the democratic
and you don't want to [Β __Β ] hear me
[Β __Β ] your skull so you [Β __Β ]
interrupted me
so i couldn't finish my [Β __Β ] point so
you could go on your stupid [Β __Β ]
tangent
shut the [Β __Β ] up you're not lying this
is not the soviets had some state
control because
no one hears what you are saying no one
hears what
shut the [Β __Β ] up shut the [Β __Β ] up shut
the [Β __Β ] up how many [Β __Β ] times
have you [Β __Β ] interrupted me midpoint
you [Β __Β ] interrupt me
where the [Β __Β ] is how you're going to
get like who the [Β __Β ]
shut the [Β __Β ] up shut your [Β __Β ] mouth
you don't even let me finish my [Β __Β ]
point
is anyone moderating this can we just
take
turns and i can speak we can yeah we can
we can move it into that if it's not
going to
finish what do you guys want to come up
with go ahead we'll mute them you finish
your point
let me finish my point what an annoying
[Β __Β ]
okay so the reason i said the communist
parties acquired power in eastern europe
as a result of world war ii
was because the soviet union
invaded those countries to reach
germany to reach berlin okay so that was
world war
ii and as a result the soviet occupation
made it easier for communist parties to
acquire power now the details of how
they acquired power i don't care to talk
about it
because it's not relevant right now
there's so much we have to get to first
but i agree it wasn't it wasn't simply
because of some uh
some you know impartial democracy or
whatever
will of the people yeah it was because
of world war ii and the soviet
invasion i'm not [Β __Β ] denying that
but
it's a myth to think that it was a form
of direct control from the kremlin to
these communist states
i mean to these communist parties it's
just not how it [Β __Β ] worked
there was an implicit understanding that
soviet union was in charge and it was
the leader
but there these communist parties
had a degree of autonomy and had a
degree of sovereignty
um one of the important reasons why
these states
some of these states uh were forced into
these
economic agreements with the ussr is
because
the soviet union believed that it was
owed reparations because many of these
countries participated in the invasion
of the ussr alongside the germans
the third thing is something you
mentioned i forgot what i was going to
say even before oh yeah the thing about
bretton woods
you're saying the soviet union forced
these countries
do not allow them to sign the agreements
to bretton woods
but since these countries are already
compromised by communist coups anyway
what does that even matter can you show
evidence that the communist states
wanted to join
bretton woods and furthermore
it's dubious to claim that
all of these communist states were
result of a direct
ooze and soviet intervention and
otherwise would it wouldn't have been
able to acquire power
because there's clear examples of
communist states throughout the history
after world war ii who broke with the
soviet union romania actually is a great
example of that yugoslavia is a clear
example of that and albania is an
example and there's
probably uh someone missing or something
but yeah
another thing um that i finally wanted
to get to is
you said something extremely stupid
about hungary
you said that the reason for the soviet
intervention in 56 in hungary was
because the soviet union
didn't want hungary to have a liberal
market economy
the soviet union didn't give a [Β __Β ]
about what kind of economic system the
hungarians wanted to adopt
what the soviets were worried about was
that hungary was going to go over to the
west
so it was all geopolitics they didn't
give a [Β __Β ] what kind of [Β __Β ]
economic system they have
and the evidence of this is the fact
that after
the events of 56 a much more moderate
communist government
acquired power in hungary and they did
implement a degree of marketization and
whatever
relative to other communist states
especially the soviet union
actually if you look at the variance of
the diff
how these systems across the communist
states in eastern europe were different
you'll realize that this idea that
there's just one type of
state control so it's a complete
[Β __Β ] almost all of these countries
had a private sector they had private
industries
and uh the picture the picture you're
trying to paint is completely inaccurate
okay
all right all right yeah now go ahead
you got bretton woods
how long are you going to let him around
can i speak now all right make sure it
goes
you got it yep you got it all right
so i understand that he wouldn't want to
get into the details of communist
leadership or
communist taking power in eastern europe
because largely the history of communism
in most of the world but especially in
eastern europe has been completely
anti-democratic
has been forced from the top down onto
the workers who are unwilling to do so
some of these details we can get into in
1948
that i know very well the communist
party of czechoslovakia
carried out a coup specifically backed
by moscow
over the democratic state of
czechoslovakia though they only got
between 20 and 30 percent of the vote in
their previous elections which is
granted
the highest percentage of popular
support
any communist any communist group has
ever gotten
when putting it up to an actual free
election so fair enough on them
instead of engaging with the other
people who are also democratically
elected by the workers
instead of engaging in a democratic
system because apparently
these people who think they represent
the masses are so afraid to actually let
the workers of democratic saying things
they could against the democratic state
overthrew it locked up
and assassinated and tortured and
murdered their political opponents and
turned it into a backwards dictatorship
in bulgaria it was the same story the
communist party failed in the elections
they got support from moscow moscow
acquiesced even offered them military
support if the coup did not go well
and the bulgarian communist party took
control of the state
locked up their political opponents and
had them shot they
for a moment allowed the peasant small
landowning party a peasant party
to mold with the communist party to form
some sort of
uh popular left coalition government but
a few years later they even
executed the more liberal members of
their own party
in romania the communist party
absolutely
failed their democratic elections and so
they got with
acquiescence from moscow they threatened
the monarch
to give them more to take over the
government
they threaten the [Β __Β ] monarch of
romania to take over the government
to do away with the elected results and
to give the communists more power in
parliament and a few years later
they were also couped as well and poland
the communist party did
miserably they actually begged the
soviet union
not to invade them because they thought
they could have a nice election
this is a fun fact that while the soviet
union was pushing through poland
a country they attacked without
provocation engaged in genocide against
helped the nazis invade and while they
were fighting the nazis
they were engaged in a guerrilla war
with the poles before the nazis were
even defeated because they wanted to
stamp out polish national pride
the polish communists did so abysmally
in the elections they had to go out
through a second round of voting
with the communist party stuffing
ballots
and um intimidating voters and they even
failed then so with acquiescence from
the communist state
they cooed the government started
rounding at political mode and started
shooting people
this is a history of communism in
eastern europe now
with regards to some of the other
economic developments and stuff
countries that specifically wanted to
gain
western economic development they wanted
some investments were
poland the baltic states and hungary all
specifically wanted more
economic development from the west
because they weren't getting it from the
their fellow communists because as much
as it's supposed to be this sort of
unified utopian bloc
they really [Β __Β ] destroyed each other
it's hardcore game theory there
the soviet union did not give them
permission and even blocked them from
going into negotiations over
international policy with the united
states
until the soviet union was specifically
involved
um a good example i like to use in so
far as development
is the success of czechoslovakia after
the fall of communism now
czechoslovakia is an interesting example
after the fall of communism
um a lot of this happened mostly because
the soviet union finally came out and
said that we are not going to be
invading other countries if they start
to liberalize
you guys have to defend yourself and so
most of these communist parties did a
sneaky thing
they open up free elections and then
they went through this long process of
rehabilitation as this actually
very pro-democratic liberal party in
czechoslovakia that didn't happen
in czechoslovakia the communist party
refused to modernize
and refuse to develop over time they
remained the communist party of old
they've been kept out of all coalitions
at this point because they're persona
non grata for the absolute misery
they've reaped on the population
but because of that czech slovakia has
had a new
a unique position as being able to
develop their economy and their
government their systems of democracy
without
any um without any intervention from the
old order they've been able to
completely remake their system
and because of that their education
their life expectancy
their economic development has increased
five-fold even though
they so a smaller nation was able to do
much better than the communists were
just through market liberalization more
democracy and
independent trade unions of the workers
which is what i'm advocating for which
is much better than you've ever been
able to offer anyone
okay so back to you how's you got a lot
there 1948's
check bulgaria we actually got a lot
going on
so i find it really peculiar so in terms
of the political history of the
communist states in europe
you are able to air all of their dirty
laundry and all of the horrible bad
parts of the history while ignoring the
good of course
within the time span of a an online
debate
but if i were to air the dirty long
laundry of the west
we i couldn't fit it in the time tan of
a debate it would take
days it would take weeks it would
probably take months right
i have to talk about operation gladio
all of the coups orchestrated by the uk
and the us
and all that [Β __Β ] going on i
wouldn't even have time to exhaust the
list
you know so the very fact that you had
time to say all of that
really shows that you really don't have
much another thing
though is that let's go point by point
by what i was able to capture from your
um
your uh unconstrained rant
so you claim that the communists seized
power in the form of coups
well this is an extremely misleading
thing to say because
the states that the communists could
right
um discerning whether they actually had
the will of the people behind them is
extremely difficult because of the war
time conditions in times of war
especially when you're invaded by a
foreign power
um the legitimacy of a state
uh breaks down so these chaotic
conditions do not
allow for a situation in which you can
establish some kind of liberal
democratic system in order to decide
which party or whatever should take
power and mind you
many of these countries romania and
bulgaria included
participated in the axis invasions of
the ussr
they were conquered and invaded by the
ussr as a result
so the situation is nowhere near as neat
and clear as all these were flourishing
democracies
and the communists came and just took
them over at the expense of the will of
the people well the will of the people
was not actually
clear whatsoever you said the communists
did very poorly
in the elections that they held well
i don't actually know which specific
elections you're referring to because
you didn't actually
cite anything and some of those counts
like in the case of poland i don't there
was a
election in poland in 1947 and the
communists
came out on top i don't know what
actually you're talking about so but
that aside you know um
the idea that liberal democracy
is the sole or even exclusive vehicle by
which
the actual will of a people can be
discerned and tested
discovered i would contest that view
especially in the
circumstances of a wartime economy but
to be quite frank with you i
frankly don't give a [Β __Β ] about
democracy i don't think states acquire
their legitimacy
from asking the consent of the the
people
a state does not could not possibly
arise in that way whatsoever what
actually matters is the extent to which
people tolerated those states and um
the people uh participated in
overthrowing them
now let's see
um yeah you mentioned it at the czech
coup the romania coup in the bulgaria
coup
you don't have time to go into the
details and the circumstances of all of
those separate
situations but i find it really funny
that you're just throwing as much [Β __Β ]
against the wall as you can just waiting
to see until something sticks
um listen when i said we don't have time
to go into detail about these things
you interpreted that as oh this is your
achilles heel you're scared to talk
about this dirty history
no it's just that a i didn't come
prepared to talk about those
very specific historical events and all
the details surrounding them
and b even if i did it would it's too
much ground to [Β __Β ] cover anyway
you're not actually staying on topic uh
about what the
actual topic was initially about and
furthermore it's really this is uh the
crooks i guess of the lie
of what series of lies you just spewed
when you said that the soviet union
invaded poland unprovoked
excuse me are you trying to say that
after
poland was invaded by the nazis and the
soviet union had to
um protect its eastern front that this
was an unprovoked invasion of poland
excuse me are you trying to say that
when poland signed a non-aggression pact
with nazi germany in 1934 and signed a
treaty sorry with nazi germany in 1934
that this didn't signal the fact the
soviet union had an unproduct
protected eastern eastern front excuse
me are you denying the fact
that poland stole soviet land during the
civil war
and engaged in a tyrannical rule against
ethnic minorities that
welcomed the soviets with open arms
excuse me
are you trying to say that the soviet
union engaged in a genocide against the
polish people
a lie so outlandish and ridiculous not
even the most
fervent anti-communist historians have
the gall to
say something like that finally you talk
about the success
of czechoslovakia which is extremely
interesting actually because
czechoslovakia might just be the only
country in europe
that you can find a degree of success
and
a degree of um let's say
succession from the communist era that
satisfies the population that actually
lived under communism
but the truth is that for the
overwhelming majority of ex-communist
states in europe
the infrastructure the fundamental means
of production the factories the ins
even institutions the culture and the
way of life
was inherited from the communist era and
capitalism has been proven
to be unable to replace those
if uh so-called european capitalism is
so great
why are they still using the
infrastructure created under the
communists why can't they create their
own infrastructure adapted to the modern
times why have they become colonies of
germany and western europe riddled with
debt
and purposefully underdeveloped to the
benefit of german industry
and at the expense of their own
industries why is it
that there is such a high degree of
nostalgia
and positive views among the people who
actually lived under communist states
to this day in eastern europe
why is it that
to this day a measure of right-wing
populism
widespread discontent and social ills is
almost directly correlated
with the fall of communism for example
in east germany
you'll find the rise of right-wing
populism in the same place
now you attribute this to the so-called
uh
desolation and ravaging that the
communists did in the 20th century but
the data doesn't actually back up any
desolation or ravaging
the data backs up extremely high rates
of growth
the providing of a basic level of
dignity and a standard of living
which admittedly um
ended in crisis but that crisis did not
comprise
sorry the the crisis resulting from the
brezhnev stagnation to clarify which one
but that that that crisis specific
economic crisis
didn't comprise the majority of life
under those communist states
and that's why even for people who
endured and lived under those crisis
they still remember life under communism
rather fondly
okay good cat oh yeah i feel like he's
getting way more time than me holy [Β __Β ]
why don't we
have timing yeah well why don't we do it
like where we'll have um like you know
two minutes uh
oh no two two don't give me two minutes
after that [Β __Β ]
i need a lot more time to go over all of
that sort of stuff all right well then
after that and then after that you guys
both had long rants and we can go back
to two minutes yeah
okay um so starting
with two of the more egregious things
you said i'd like to start with
the fact that he thinks you don't
actually need democracy to represent the
people
and this other statement he made about
states getting their legitimacy by
placating the people
with material goods oddly materialistic
and i would say capitalistic of him
but i would say i it's this is language
i don't understand
in my view as a christian democrat as an
economic and social
and a political liberal at least i'm
socially conservative
i believe that the only right any state
has to exist is
the right is given to it by the consent
of the people that it exists over
um i find it interesting and i think
it's telling that the communist here is
saying
that we don't actually need multi-party
democracy to understand the world of the
people we don't actually need their
opinion we just need to placate them
this is a language of fascism that's why
i think that communism is in its
in true form fascism is just honest
communists
communists wish they could be as
effective as the fascists and taking
state power
now maybe i don't understand this
language because christian democracy
never had to be forced onto anyone with
the bayonet the way communism had to be
and my people the people of germany of
austria of denmark
peru although you don't like me bringing
up latin america they voted for my
beliefs they continue to vote for my
beliefs and they will probably continue
to vote for my beliefs in the future
and czechoslovakia during the velvet
revolution where they did not
dismantle the communist party like they
did in another stage the communist party
was simply allowed to take place
in the open and free election the
communists lost
and they continue to lose their persona
non grata
and so far as coalition building nobody
wants to touch them
and the tiny minority of the population
votes for them compared to
all of these other political parties
that are newer and are less established
um a few other things i understand that
you're very mad every time i bring up
the actual particulars of how communists
have actually behaved when they've taken
state power
um if i was a communist i wouldn't want
to talk about communist
history either because that history is
of totalitarianism
is of genocide is incredibly bloody and
this is a time period where the rest of
the world at least in western europe
had sort of moved on from that while
western europe was more focused on
commercial goods for its citizens on
health care on creating better education
systems and creating entertainment
the soviet union was still trying to
mass murder people and
figure out how to placate the masses so
they unlike chauchesku
wouldn't be thrown out in the streets
and shot like a [Β __Β ] the way they
deserved
now one of the worst things i think you
spoke about
overall was the odd genocide denial for
the polls
now first off you talk about the soviet
union
as if you don't remember the molotov
ribbon trough pact
the soviet union sided with the nazis
they the soviet union offered oil
rubbers and other necessary materials
for the german war effort
and in a runabout way the germans would
return that favor
by offering them weapons which they
would then use to genocide the poles
along with the nazis it was so bad that
the soviet union
when the katine massacre was found or a
number of other massacres were also
found
by the western powers tried to blame it
on the nazis
and luckily through international courts
and
through historians and data collectors
we figured out who really murdered all
of those innocent people
the poll the polls were genocided by the
soviet union it was a small genocide it
was calculated to try and take away the
national spirit of the polish people
it was called the polish operation
within the soviet union
before the war with poland
in which the soviet union and nazi
germany took sides
to bully a smaller power they began to
round up torture and execute
ethnic polls within the soviet union the
death rate um well the number of deaths
are not exactly known
because a lot of that we'll never know
because of where they were buried
we won't ever figure it out but the
estimated
number of deaths are somewhere between
200 to 400 000
polish civilians murdered within the
soviet union proper
and then when the soviet union invaded
poland killed within their own country
um by the nkvd and various other organs
of the communist state
this was murder ethnically based because
the soviets wanted to crush the national
spirit of smaller powers that they
wanted to invade
i think it's disgusting that you deny
this genocide happen and i think it's
weird
that you act as if poland was deserving
some sort of retributive
genocide from the soviet union when the
soviet union
out of poland in the soviet union the
soviet union was far more
a partner with nazi germany they gave
them oil rubber
they helped rebuild the german military
when the germans were
trying to secretly rebuild their air
force and their tanks
um the soviet union
made deals within the robins molotov
rivenfront practice not only divided
poland but the rest of eastern europe
and the baltic states the soviet union
days before they were invaded by nazi
germany
sent deals to hitler asking him if he
could engage in a co-invasion
of turkey the same way that they did the
polls
i understand that you would lie about
this because it doesn't make communists
look bad but i would say
that this is simply the natural alliance
between two
ideologically very similar groups the
fascists and the not the fascists and
the socialists in fact i mean
the marxist socialists teaming up with
the fascist socialists
to ethnically cleanse regions and take
them for their own
is not surprising at all i i guess we
can go back to the back and forth now
okay all right i have to respond to all
of that now
i actually have 10 bullet points i'll
just go through it i'll just
so um wow
so i guess we're moving on odd so you
said it's oddly materialistic and
capitalistic of me i don't know news
flash we marxists are materialists
i don't know why you're saying that's
some kind of irony um
i don't really care about your larp
christian democracy cope
christian democracy is a phrase that has
relevance in certain
european countries if you think
christian democracy is going to save
romania
good luck uh you say that
you're you're spouting some dogmatic
political philosophy [Β __Β ] about
legitimacy of the gov of states and
political legitimacy
this is all prejudice of 18th century
liberalism
which is fully outdated as of now
obviously states cannot acquire their
legitimacy
from some kind of election because it's
a chicken in the egg question it begs
the question of where that state came
from no state ever came into being
because someone went around asking
people
what they want to vote on states come
into view into being by means of
violence that is how every state in the
history of mankind
came into being certain states are
multi-so-called multi-party democracies
where the population takes turns uh
voting on
which group of thieves and corrupt
ruling class representatives are going
to
con them and scan them but the
fundamental foundation of statehood
remains intact
okay um now you accuse me of
using the language of fascism when i say
this
well i have a question for you did
fascists cease power in communist states
or liberal democratic states
after all weimar germany was a
multi-party
liberal democracy a multi-party liberal
democracy
mind you that the christian democrats
actually had a party with him
the conservatives in germany uh
hindenburg were the ones who enabled
hitler and allowed hitler to come to
power in germany
so for you to accuse communists of being
the same as fascists
begs the question of why it is that
bachelors can only manage to come to
power in liberal demand
democratic countries uh you mentioned
peru as an example of people voting for
your beliefs peru just voted for a
self-proclaimed marxist leninist pedro
castillo f's in the chat
we know communists lose elections in
eastern europe there's reasons for that
that go far beyond
reasons you gave and um
know the particulars of how communists
behave that you're saying i'm trying to
cover up as you've mentioned them are
very specific to post-war
europe f's in the chat for that one
you're talking about mo
totalitarianism genocide and
authoritarianism and everything
anything you say about the communist
states has nothing on the history of
european imperialism and american
imperialism
especially during the cold war where
america backed
several coups and ruthless military
dictatorships and genocides
in the name of stopping communism give
me a break and
six what forms of mass murder can you
refer to after the 50s you claim the
soviet union was defined by that
afterwards
i would love to see you refer to actual
examples talk about the molotov
ribbentrop pack that was in 1939 that
was after all of the western powers
rejected non-aggression treaties
with the ussr it had to resort as a last
resort to buy itself time the soviet
union was not prepared to go to war with
nazi germany in 1939
it buying time for itself is not the
same as enabling and joining in an
alliance with the nazis
as for the claim about them trying to
divide europe this is an extremely
misleading claim they weren't trying to
divide europe to control it they were
trying to secure
borders and frontiers from invasions in
other words
they were trying to negotiate with the
germans about which countries they
can and can't invade it has nothing to
do with the soviet union
seizing power the captain massacre even
if it was perpetrated by the soviet
union and this is contested by some
scholars like professor grover fur
is not an example of a genocide it
targeted the polish intelligentsia not
because they were polish but because
they had a specific relation to the
prior polar state
uh you claim that polls were rounded up
tortured and executed
soviet union this is just a plain lie
substantiated and baseless you say the
death toll
is four hundred thousand or something or
two hundred thousand also one hundred
percent made up
um the turkey allegations need to be
substantiated with evidence
and now you're saying that communist and
fascists have an alliance i have a
question for you who supported the
fascists in europe
america who were the who were who was
more likely to support fascism
communists or
christian democrats at the time the
truth is is that liberals and
conservatives and right-wingers and
nationalists all across europe
enabled and implicitly or explicitly
supported fascism
against the so-called communist menace
that is actually the facts
that are on the record thank you very
much
um insofar as
fascism only being able to take hold in
liberal democracies i would say that's
false
the weimar republic was the only liberal
democracy that fascism took control of
the it's the fascists in italy took
control of a monarchy the fascists in
italy
i mean the fascists in spain took
control of the monarchy the fascists in
japan took control of the monarchy
the fascists in austria well there
wasn't really a democracy in austria
before the fascists took control of it
um i would say that's a bad point
because
whether or not the fascists took control
of
one liberal democracy it was the liberal
democracies that eventually bound
together and destroyed fascism
um the
there's a lot of other [Β __Β ] so the um
the the borders thing for justification
of
the invasion of poland and then the the
molotov ribbon trough pact
for people that were so worried about
german aggression it's weird that they
continuously set germany
military equipment oil rubber
industrial steel factory equipment even
helped
train german tankists and builds german
tanks within the soviet union proper
within their organization and the soviet
union was only doing this before
doing this until the communists could
reign and liberate the people of
the that the germans would occupy why
then as a good faith effort did the
soviet union
round up jews and other communists who
had fled nazi germany
to poland round them up and send them to
hitler to be executed in the death camps
as a show of good faith and cooperation
if they were only worried about
self-defense why didn't they
help the polls during the invasion and
not kill polish soldiers and kill polish
civilians
the only reason the western powers
didn't want a
a a special mutual defense treaty with
soviet unions because
other states which had made up these
sorts of unions with the soviet union of
romania was an example
hungary was an example every other time
the soviet union did this
they used it as a pretense to steal land
from these people
you mentioned that poland still land
from from russia are you really so
bent and and are you really that pissy
over the polish soviet war
where the soviet union spent its time
invading other countries again they do
this a lot invading all of the other
countries of eastern europe unprovoked
because they wanted to stop these other
nations from breaking off of czarist
russia
and declaring their own independent
republics
are you just really pissy that they got
their asses handed to them from all of
these tinier nations
i mean that's the fault of communism
purging itself so often
um oh there's a there's a whole lot of
other stuff
um
there's i don't know it seems weird that
that you keep ranting about uh how you
don't actually need the people say
to actually lead the people i i would
say that yes it is fascist language to
claim
that you somehow know the will of the
people and you can lead them and you can
be the most democratic organ of state
power
but you don't actually need a democracy
they don't actually have to vote on it
that's very odd to me but again you know
i come from a background
of um of democrats of people who wanted
to expand voting rights to the oppressed
to expand protections to those people
expand human rights
i myself am part roma um i have no love
for the old empires of europe
they've really [Β __Β ] with us there's a
reason why there aren't any gypsies in
france anymore
um again what aboutism to the entire
history of europe since
bc up until
the soviet union i mean there's going to
be a lot of [Β __Β ] there what i'm saying
is that the soviet union or communists
should have at least known better if
you're claiming
to be a better people and claiming to be
able to
better offer people better lives under
your system
i would say that again the monarchist
history of europe was shitty however
christian democrats and other democrats
helped rebuild europe after european
reconstructionism under true democracies
and they were able to do it
and they're able to do it and they were
able to give people better lives
better educations better health they
were able to connect them to the wider
world in a way that communism has never
been able to do
okay back to you house okay let's go
wyman republic was not the only country
because italy wasn't an absolute
monarchy it was a constitutional
monarchy yet another lie
spain was also not an absolute monarchy
in the time but even if it was
the whole spanish civil war resulted
from the conditions of spain
becoming a republic that's where the
fascist reaction came from but after
franco took power actually
it's kind of ambiguous to call spain
fascist it's i think it would be
contested the fascist philanthropy
didn't actually take power
um and the only evidence you need that
the soviets were worried about german
aggression is that
that's all they ever talked about for
most of the 1930s after hitler took
power
and it's proven by their attempt to form
security alliances with france and the
uk
and poland too by the way why would they
[Β __Β ] do that if they weren't scared
of german aggression or they didn't
anticipate german aggression clearly
they
did the reason the soviet union had to
engage and trade with the germans after
the molotov ribbon trump act
is because a they need the materials
because guess what those same
materials and goods they were getting
from germany also bolstered their
military too um
and they also needed to buy time because
again the soviet union was not prepared
in 1939 to confront
the german menace the soviet union sent
political prisoners back
but this was a combination of prisoner
exchanges with the
germans as well as paranoia about
foreign spies saboteurs and
members of the trotskyist ring of
whatever agents
whether they were correct or not the
reason was because they thought many of
these people were spies it wasn't
because they
collaborated with the nazis and liked
nazis uh these people probably would
have been executed anyway and some of
them actually were executed by the way
um and i have you're saying that the the
reason france and the uk
didn't want to enter into a security
alliance with the soviet union was
because
the soviet union stole land from people
what [Β __Β ] land was the soviet union
going to steal
from france or the uk they don't even
share a border it doesn't even make any
sense
the polar soviet war wasn't because of
soviet aggression that's a plain lie it
was because they were invaded by almost
every major power on earth
including poland who were trying to take
advantage of the soviet union situation
at the time
your stupid liberal theories about
political legitimacy are completely
meaningless it's not about
knowing what the people's will is
beforehand it's about participating in
the question of the people's will in a
way more fundamental in a way
deeper than just holding formal
elections
people's will is out there and whoever
can best represent it will acquire power
power is its
ability to seize power and hold power is
also a measure of
the consent of the govern and your
christian democrat
cope is meaningless to me i just have
one question for you
why didn't they help romania which
remains extremely underdeveloped
uh to this day um i find it funny that
you're calling me copenharper when
you're
defending the soviet union a failed
dictatorship which collapsed
which collapsed over 20 years ago and
you're joking at me
while i'm representing economic theories
which helped reconstruct western europe
which i think is
still around hey don't interrupt me
[Β __Β ]
um well i would say the christian
democrats are helping europe
um germany and the eu is offered has
been giving a lot
of investment and loans to romania
to help them build their educational
system to help build their
um help build their infrastructure it's
been helping romania a lot in the past
10 years
um the eu has been really good in that
way and it's also been really good at
helping
citizens from those countries who have
the ability who may not necessarily have
the um
the opportunity in those nations to go
abroad and to further their education
have a better life for themselves
i wasn't raised in romania luckily i was
adopted i was an orphan
in bucharest i don't know where my
background is from but i was adopted by
a christian charity and i got to grow up
in the united states
and i'm going for my masters now you
know it's probably a better life i have
here than i would have had in romania
thanks to the commies
um this weird might makes right
philosophy i
i i assume it's because marx is a
hegelian um
but again this just sounds like fascism
to me you know we take
power he who takes power actually
represents the will of the people i
don't believe that's true
i think humanity has moved past tribal
conflict where
whoever has the most sticks and can boop
the other people on the snoots more
is the the one who's most correct i
think that as human beings
who've gotten logic and reason and
empathy from christ is able or are able
to come up with better systems of
representation than
he who has power gets to rule um
there's a lot of other [Β __Β ] um the
the going back and forth on the molotov
ribbon truth act obviously the soviet
union is just going to say well we had
to this
because nobody's going to fully admit
that they
sided with the nazis simply because it
was more economically feasible for them
to do
so i always thought that socialists put
you know human rights
and morals over economic
over economic and increases in gdp and
[Β __Β ] like that
but i guess you guys are just as bad as
the neoliberals then
um again um
you call me cope you say keep coping a
lot but i mean i can fall back on
economies like germany and austria
denmark czechoslovakia well the czech
republic they broke apart
um as examples for the future and i
would say if you look at the voting
patterns of people more and more people
are looking for a society where
there's more democracy there's more
transparency in the government they have
more of a say in the government
or they want more independent trade
unions and the people are obviously
looking for a
better spiritual health as well this
experimentation with
like complete neoliberal atheism has
been a complete failure since the 80s
and 90s
and people are obviously harming for it
but that's why people are returning to
god
uh not necessarily through the catholic
church but then again they would say i'm
a heretic anyway i'm agnostic
i'm a gnostic christian and we're some
weird coptic uh
sect that they don't necessarily like
very much um
i mean you can say you can laugh about
me coping as much as you want but you
will always be some weird guy ranting on
the internet about a failed dictatorship
that murdered
millions of innocent people and i can
always be the guy who's saying well
my people vote for me i didn't have to
force them i didn't have to roll tanks
over anyone
to get them to vote for center-right
political parties
that were open to organized labor and
are and follow christian ethics
in fact i think the best socialists the
socialists in spain you were talking
about earlier
were heavily based off of liberation
theology which is something that we
share in common the christian democrats
and the spanish catholic socialists
believed in a form of liberation
theology where we believe that human
beings as creations of god
have a right to self-determination and
have a right to dignity you obviously
don't believe they have a right to
dignity because you're a communist and
you think
the only right they have is to be talked
down to by whoever has the most guns
which i would say is a
very bleak view on the world i would say
it's also telling
that the chat right now it's filled with
a bunch of people with hammers
and socialist icons in their names
talking about how autocracy is nice
um but then again i guess that's the
crowd that you communists bring people
who like autocracy and hate the worker
um yeah and we are going to be getting
to uh q a soon so i might go ahead
this will be the last one uh yeah and we
will also have closing statements and
final thoughts after
um q a that's good so first the
christian democrats didn't rebuild
europe
america did in the american bretton
woods system america was
untouched by the war only country that
grew
during the war so that's a complete
romania remains poor and underdeveloped
romanians don't agree with you and
they're migrating and fleeing at record
rates
voting with their feet romania has not
been
um maybe a small minority of romanians
are though i didn't say actually that
might makes right you're making
assumptions about my
so-called political philosophy and
putting words in my mouth all i said is
that not everything outside of
liberalism is fascism and i also said
the state does not acquire its being it
doesn't come into being as a result of
being voted in order to have a system
of so-called multi-party democracy you
have to take as its premise
violent state dictatorship which is an
objective fact it's not saying that
might makes right it just means that
actual will and consent of the is a much
more complicated
relationship with statehood what can be
measured at ballot boxes
there's a more fundamental basis of
statehood in democracy
not the same as saying might is stuff
you said about logic and reason coming
from christ i don't know why you're
preaching at me
not interested you said uh so
regarding the molotov ribbon shop pack
i'm just going to assume since you've
ignored all of the arguments
that i've forwarded to demonstrate uh
that
indeed the soviet union did not
collaborate with nazi germany because
they
sided with the nazis or had something
i'm just going to assume you're
conceding my point
um you can't fall upon the economies you
mentioned germany austria denmark
because those countries have never
actually replicated their systems in
non-western countries it's only western
european country
under the auspices of the american union
and europe euro-american imperialism
that you can have
those kinds of civic economies and
germany specifically is a peculiar
example because
the idea that germany came into being
because of elections is a [Β __Β ] lie
uh germany its fate was decided by the
victors of world war ii germany didn't
even have a say in it
um uh so it's really stupid if if
again why hasn't why haven't they saved
romania uh
again your people didn't vote for you
it's complete
[Β __Β ] uh the question is
which spanish i had last question what
spanish
liberation theology socialists are you
talking about you're talking about latin
america and not spain
verify what you mean
oh i see responding to all of that you
keep bringing up why haven't you saved
romania i can't help that they're not
romanians aren't following my particular
mostly western economic ideology i have
been saying of course that
the you know the eurozone has probably
been doing more for romania than the
soviets ever did at least they're
getting investment they're getting funds
to go to education
to improve their health care and to
improve their um
to improve the country as a whole and
you know it's a working process they've
only been independent since 18
since 1989 it's when they shot shoshesku
deservedly
um so we'll just have to wait to the
future things are picking up in eastern
europe the baltic states are doing
particularly well
um as i mentioned in the very beginning
of this debate there are plenty of
nations
ranging from the czech republic to
slovakia to
hungary to a number of other ones which
are happy with the move to multi-party
democracy which believe that their lives
are getting better
under this new system there are issues
again
as i said earlier the um the communist
regimes have permanently scarred these
places
they will probably almost always be
behind all of the nations that did not
have to suffer under the totalitarian
booth of communism
but we can't really help that you're the
guys who turn them into dictatorship
shitholes in the first place
you can't be blamed on that uh we can't
be blamed for that that's not our fault
we weren't there if we were in charge it
wouldn't have happened
um why hasn't it been reproduced in
other non-western
other non-western european countries um
well technically it has denmark's a
northern european country not western
one and denmark was
an imperial territory of the swedish
empire for most of its history
and you know barring the brief times
they're also invaded by the prussians
um canada is not a western european
place that's also a colony and they've
been doing very well there and i would
say that while they don't necessarily
fall into christian democracy
these sort of uh liberal markets
open to private investment but also open
to humane labor laws
and organized labor has been doing well
for canada as well
america seems to be opening up to it as
well and we'll see within the next 10 to
15 years on
how well the democrats do in future
elections maybe the democrats pull
through
and they get rid of these idiots in the
squad and they take on a more
realistic more in line with christian
democracy more in line with rein
capitalist system
of you know working on capitalism
with uh with the workers having a better
saying it through organized labor not
just
coming down i understand you get pissy
about all of this
a lot of things and i understand that
you get bored because the only thing you
can talk about is your meme
soon-to-be great soviet union nation
that collapsed a few years ago
um the real world is
you just say anything that stumbles on
your mind um one i can't help
uh what you're saying about the eurozone
is total [Β __Β ]
romania remains an underdeveloped colony
and
oh it's only been it's only been 30
years that's literally like half the
lifespan of the communist states that's
a really long time
yikes saying that yeah generally what
you're saying about eastern europe is
[Β __Β ] i don't care what they're
telling you people around are not
the final thing is that uh
should i i don't know is this like a
comedy now you're saying denmark canada
and america aren't part of the west and
the european civilization
yikes i don't know what to say i think
that one speaks for it
well you said western europe denmark is
northern europe canada
american country i said a western and
european countries
so okay we get to the q and a now
let's do that okay um all right so
let me read the super chats first from
tyler durden
what's a better measure of economic
success gdp or utility
um i think gdp per capita and
purchasing power and levels of education
are probably a better way of looking at
this than just
gdp overall how did you want to answer
that too
i actually don't know what utility how
[Β __Β ] my mic is
yeah i don't know what utility means
where do you went on this huge communist
economic thing and you don't know
like understand utility in economics
that's weird
okay from cg infrared is intellectually
dishonest because he is
discounting the 1956 revolt in
hungary and how many other states
revolted against soviet
tyranny well i actually directly
addressed and talked about 19
hungary but thanks for wasting your
comment uh well i don't think you did
address them very well you completely
ignored the prague spring which the
soviet union invaded czechoslovakia to
stop liberalization
um largely they were very pissy that
once the press was released
they spent most of their time they spent
most of their time insulting
moscow communists excuse that
the excuse that they were afraid that
hungary would go to the west after
they'd been [Β __Β ] with so much by the
soviets
is a poor excuse that's like an abusive
boyfriend
because he's worried you said it was
because of the market economy you said
it was
literally had nothing to do with it you
said they wanted a market economy and it
literally had no
i said they wanted state liberalization
and yeah they did want some market
liberalization that had nothing to do
with the soviet union's invasion
yes it did we can we can play back we
can play back the [Β __Β ] clip and see
what exactly what you said
i did have a lot with the soviet
invasion they stopped them specifically
to stop
and moving into a more western economic
system you don't know what you're doing
as they did with
czech slovakia in the prague spring it's
weird that every time people have a say
they want to get as far away from you as
possible
they weren't asking for [Β __Β ]
liberalization during the proc spring
they were asking for a different type of
socialism
by the way no they were no they were
asking for market liberalization for
state
they weren't they were asking for
socialism with the human face you don't
know no they weren't
socialism with the human face was dude
the prague spring was a really sporadic
student uprising it was like may 68
was like may 68 it was like a bunch of
students with really ambiguous
ideals or whatever no it was not like
that in france it was
first off alexander dukchek the leader
of czechoslovakia and the
vast majority of the citizenry who rose
up
and were fighting with the soviet
invaders for up to eight months after
the invasion
and pockets of resistance all around i
thought the government was illegitimate
um yeah the overall communist state was
a legitimate alexander
was a rare gem in the [Β __Β ] that was
communist
conveniently an enemy of the soviet
union and the enemy of the eastern bloc
is the yeah well i mean yeah
most moral people most god-fearing good
men are enemies of the soviet union and
the eastern bloc
okay that's what you're saying but i
don't know
all right so from g.a korobo cheshire
cat you don't
owe anything to the anglos in that
orphanage
free your mind brah um
i wasn't adopted by anglers my mother is
an italian immigrant
um i'm i'm pro-isla i grew up
learning ira songs and i'm pro um
scottish independence
i am not hypnotized by the anglo-menace
uh
do not worry chatters i am woke on the
angler question
all right so from tyler durden is
cheshire cat going to make an argument
for christian democracy or just try to
argue against communism
uh well my argument is that my system is
better um i
as i said in my earlier statement and as
i'll reiterate in my closing statement
that i think christian democracy offers
a more democratic state
it all obviously our economic systems
offer a better standard of living
living than any of the communists have
been able to offer and
i also believe people are clearly
suffering under the sort of weird
neoliberal atheistic worldview where
people are expected to take narcotics to
feel happy now
and i think christian democracy uniquely
handles that as well
okay um from that robot
cheshire cat why do you argue christian
democracy works because of the
because of the economies of germany and
austria and the likes
by that same metric isn't marxism
leninism
a more successful system because of the
gdp of china
the world's largest economy um no
see my idea is that people are able to
do this under a liberal
non liberal state where they aren't
being tortured by their own government
where they also have better where they
also have better access to education
better health a better outlook on the
world i think
if you pull if you look at polling
they're even happier on average
um so it's not just gdp as i mentioned
my earlier statement
it's purchasing power it's availability
of goods for the average citizen
it's availability of food it's
availability of happiness
um and all of those things christian
democracy has done better and will do
better than communists ever will yeah
all of the alienation and loneliness and
spiritual degradation that followed the
collapse of communism all of that
is apparently sweeped under the rug nice
one
well i mean hey alcoholism started in
the soviet union
long before so we're not just talking
about alcoholism we're talking about
widespread
anti-social tendencies we're talking
about prostitution
we're talking about spiritual
degradation we're talking about lack of
community we're talking about lack of
belonging lack of purpose all of those
things follow the collapse of communism
whereas under communism
people felt like they had a sense of
community and they had a sense of uh
society-wide solidarity um this is not
true i will say that the
the uh and suicide rates what about
suicide people are taking their lives
more than they weren't
people didn't have a chance to kill
themselves under the soviet union
because they were being murdered by the
state so often what so obviously the
suicide rate is going down they didn't
have a chance to kill them
obviously and also obviously there
aren't many prostitutes in the soviet
union because that was criminalized in
like 1935 they're all sent to the gym
under christian society there's
widespread child trafficking
what a holy christian society you're
talking about i'm actually in nations
like sweden they've been
uh cracking down is the most [Β __Β ] up
one of all are you kidding sweden's a
fully atheist
nihilistic state that everything goes i
don't believe
sweden i don't believe sweden is an
atheistic nihilist state
they do have some problems but i mean
it's not that bad i mean
to be fair like i would say that
nihilist atheism is usually brought
about by the commies than it is by group
which literally not all christians
conservative christians will admit that
the
real christian values were best
actualized under communist states
that is 100 not sure no it's true have
you
have you gone to church no i'm not
christian but i'm just telling you yeah
so stop telling me what i believe all
right [Β __Β ] get the [Β __Β ] out of
here you're we i don't care what you
believe you're probably bringing us
this is
you don't speak for all christians
there's many christian communists pedro
castillo and peru is one of them there's
many
there's many the communists in russia
are christian what are you talking about
well first off there are eastern
orthodox right i don't they are not part
of my club
okay well i think they're christian as a
neutral spectator who's not involved in
whatever
cult [Β __Β ] you're talking oh yeah but
you have this like i i mean i keep
getting these pm's i don't want to bring
it up but i keep getting people keep
telling me you have this weird sense of
yellow fever where
you're just like get really hard on for
russians and asians for some apparent
reason
so are you talking about do you know
that i descend from wait do you actually
have
a guy in your in your discord who's like
a mod who pretends to be asian but he's
actually white
and he pretends to be chinese is that
true no i don't what the [Β __Β ]
are you talking about you don't it's
[Β __Β ] still he's making me a liar
i know i've been told by two people now
that you have guys
actually chinese chinese dude
he's camped up before he's chinese
he's camped up before he's chinese the
guy that's a show runner
ezra he's actually chinese you dumb [Β __Β ]
he's can't look at our [Β __Β ] archives
he's cammed up before in our videos you
sound stupid as [Β __Β ]
you're talking about a hard on listen
you don't even know the whole okay
shut the [Β __Β ] up you don't
we're [Β __Β ] pretending
why are you sexually harassing me you
can't have my dick
[Β __Β ] off i think you were i think you
were the one shouting that you were
going to skull [Β __Β ] me earlier so i
think you're the one doing the sexual
harassment
something oh you have a heart on what
the [Β __Β ] are you talking about you
[Β __Β ] weirdo
what a christian you are huh that you
talking what are you gonna bring in my
mouth what a christian you are such a
filthy disgusting mouth
hey i'm a good christian i haven't i
guys fake christian chat let him know
who's a fake christian you're so pissed
right now you're going after my faith
you don't even know what to say we'll
see who won after the debate's over
we'll see
i i hey i saw it in the chat you've been
you've been [Β __Β ]
pumping your supporters into the [Β __Β ]
youtube channel
gorillas they're all spamming gorillas
you can't even see my [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] i'm on [Β __Β ] twitch wait twitch
is a public platform
i have a twitch you could see public
twitch chats okay well i
the only channel [Β __Β ] you're talking
to is the one in my [Β __Β ] chat
you just make [Β __Β ] up you're a [Β __Β ]
liar you know lying's a sin right
you've lied a lot during this time about
lying at all
lying is
are asking the world court to legally uh
and the world court doesn't agree with
them no one agrees with well they're
still
talking about it right now obviously
about whatever the [Β __Β ] obviously the
russians are not going to allow
you to recognize it as a genocide
because the russians were the ones who
[Β __Β ] did it
it's just like the chinese it's just
like the chinese there's someone that
you went from so okay
you committed genocide you committed
genocide you committed genocide i'm
talking about it therefore it's true you
committed judgment
okay so let's move on um has oh did i
read this one hungary
was invaded and revolted against the
soviets the people rejected a foreign
ruler
discard geopolitics how were the soviets
right
yeah a lot of people are bringing up the
fact that
i gotta turn up my gain because my mic
is [Β __Β ] up
um how were the soviets right
the soviets had an option let hungary go
to the west
and thereby undermine the whole eastern
bloc and the warsaw pact
or do something yeah i admit it was a
horrible situation i'm actually of the
view though
that i hold the leadership of um
hungary and the soviet union after
stalin's death responsible for letting
that situation develop
in the first place it was a bad
situation i'm not here to celebrate it
but that was the option on the soviet
union's table they
they had this option were they right
well the situation wasn't right in the
first place the soviet union was
isolated
by viciously aggressive western
imperialism that wanted to kick-start
the german uh and general uh
military-industrial complex after world
war ii for a full-scale inflate invasion
of the soviet union again
after the scar of world war ii the
soviet people
were not going to afford and allow or
tolerate another invasion of their
homeland
yeah this is just not true first off the
west kept offering you guys free money i
don't understand why
you could have at least taken the money
and then done your whole no no we
already talked about bretton we already
talked about bretton woods so shut the
[Β __Β ] up you don't have to bring it back
you already lost the debate
you lost the debate so you come back and
the question was addressed to me anyway
you dumb cat
both respond to these questions okay
that'll take forever um so we're gonna
do okay so yeah so
ga korobov said yeah mods are really hot
for haws in this debate
no you just pissed me off earlier oh
wait so you're admitting that you're
you're a bit biased now
maybe a little trouble what a pissy
[Β __Β ]
i know um anyways so
so from paul belden this is the second
day in a row you got embarrassed
in debate don't quit your day job well
we'll see what the majority thinks after
the debate's over
okay um let me see what else we got here
that we can pull up
jay corbin uh cheshire can't afford a
video camera despite the triumph of
christian democracy and capitalism
i'm a 22 year old university student i
can't afford anything that's just how
the system is made also i live in the
united states
if i lived in denmark or germany i could
probably afford a video camera
we'll live there i'll you know i'm a
good swimmer i'll get right
over there all right too many [Β __Β ]
damn [Β __Β ]
like red rose [Β __Β ] commies in america
anyway [Β __Β ] the anglosphere
these get out of english-speaking
countries go to ireland where the celts
will protect me
so abdullah uh what do you think uh
fascism has
to me fascism is a zombie mutation of
liberalism and also liberal democracy
okay and spencer it's weird
nobody [Β __Β ] cares shut up cg
how us how does infrared account for
stalinist destroying the
catalonia commune during the spanish
civil war as being justified if they
were
moral doing so right it's a lie actually
what happened is that towards the end of
the war
he left opposition to the so-called
stalinists
negotiated with franco because they
didn't want they feared communist
uh seizing power of the popular front so
actually a combination of anarchists
trotskyists and liberals were the ones
who undermined the war effort and
actually [Β __Β ] the whole thing over
the idea that stalinists were sabotaging
it stalinists
who were pushing for a broad popular
front to focus on the actual war effort
and winning the spanish majority
while the anarchists were doing dumb
[Β __Β ] uh
experimental [Β __Β ] that was a
complete distraction yeah try again
buddy
okay so from based in red pill ask the
christian democracy how he feels about
monarchy since heaven is a kingdom oh i
remember this guy in the discord
um i do not believe in your conception
of heaven as some sort of divine
monarchy like we have on earth heaven is
non-corporeal first of all so it doesn't
even count
um and so far i i said in the very
beginning of the bit that i don't even
consider
uh constitutional monarchy monarchies to
be truly liberal societies that's why i
advocate for the abolitionism
of the swedish and the uh british
monarch because those [Β __Β ] need to go
they're norman invaders anyway [Β __Β ] the
queen she's german
um yeah so i i don't support
monarchy i support a mult a multi-party
representative system
all right so from dragon nightmare ask
cheshire cat if he believes in the labor
aristocracy
um [Β __Β ] if you have to google this
labor aristocracy is what where you have
like these i know skilled upper class
laborers who perform their own
aristocracy within the the working class
or some [Β __Β ]
i don't know i do believe that um
there's like this so you have the sort
of middle class and comfortable working
class of very skilled workers
and i think um for instance in housing
policy
um when it comes to uh like blocking
paying their taxes on housing in
california i do think it is it does look
weird when
you have these very successful
middle-class people who seem like they
want to shut the door
on economic mobility behind them and
when they get the chance to [Β __Β ] around
with their
their local politics but i mean you know
that that's bad but that seems to be
a problem that every single system in
the world has had
i mean no one has been able to fix it so
far okay
um at least my labor
aristocracy and capitalism isn't sending
you to a gulag
okay from uh grandma too to haas what's
your opinion on the book everyday
stalinism
uh these are interesting books i
recommend they're gonna give you a far
more
nuanced far more impartial view
obviously they're still biased
but they're way better than the dumb
[Β __Β ] that chechire cat reads that
says the
communists were eating babies and killed
five billion people
and uh were doing all these horrible
things so i reck i can i can give my
thumbs up that these are
more or less pretty reliable sources
i would recommend the book the cold war
by aud arne vestad he is one of the
foremost scholars
on the cold war in asia and eurasia to
be fair
on the planet he has a very good book
the audiobook is
lovely and if you have a subscription to
uh audible
the question was for me let's get this
along the question was for me no one
gives a [Β __Β ] shut the [Β __Β ] up oh you
shut the [Β __Β ] up nobody cares about you
did we did we do this gold medal uh are
the oppressed
colonized nations denmark and canada i'm
not sure if we did that one they're all
over the place with these questions um
no i just think it's funny people talk
about these other nations who were most
of their history also colonies
um and talk about them like they're like
they were traipsing around
africa like i mean denmark was in the
northern wars
uh two of her pre-northern wars were
like a backwoods of the swedish empire
it just sort of got batted between the
swedish empire and pol and the prussian
empire for a while
canada was invaded by the uh was was
taken over and
stolen from the french and sadly as much
as america tried we could not liberate
them in the war of 1812
but yeah both of these even believe it
or not even white people
can be oppressed colonials i understand
that you hate white people
it's really sad that it was stolen from
the french it's like the indigenous
white people of canada must really have
been
upset about that so see cg said that i
missed their
their super chat about um the spanish
civil war i couldn't swear i read this
but i'll just read it again just in case
um how does infrared account first no
you read it you read it yeah i read that
okay
so all right so i didn't miss it um
the third rail by omar has are you
arabic yes okay
now let's get to some of these that i
had to jot down from uh how do you feel
about the
the genocide of the kurds by the uh
[Β __Β ] would you ask me that you dumb ass
what cause i'm guessing you i'm guessing
you don't have
that one either is that another genocide
that didn't exist or was this justified
so you're assuming you're assuming
you're assuming i have views about
kurdish people
because of my ethnicity yikes i was just
curious do you think
what a brotherly christian thing of you
you're just a racist what a brotherly
holy christian
assumption you just made right i know
it's the gypsy side sorry
um assuming you think the kurds are
backed by the ca and deserved it
i have literally no idea how to
pronounce that so i'm not even gonna try
do you know how to pronounce that um
it's like yeah it's like
irish we'll never get there shilling for
anglo-metaphysics yeah well he's
brainwashed it's not his fault
okay um all right so from dragon
nightmare
question for cheshire cat i i'm [Β __Β ]
his wife what will he do okay
that's not a question um all right so
from columbia
can you get them to steer back to
whether
whether marxian socialism is better than
christian democracy
um okay that was most about yeah i was
trying to debate that but he wanted to
talk about ninjas and samurais
but can you can you say that again no
uh from adrian's and oh god these are a
lot of troll questions you guys come on
from dd defeater for infrared how do you
explain the overwhelming consensus among
historians in a variety of diverse
fields
economists and other experts that
marxist socialism is unsuccessful
china has a population of 1.4 billion
people so that consensus if you're just
because consensus means it's like oh
it's a bunch of people well there's more
people in china who disagree with that
i risk my case i think they're talking
about academics
there's western there's western
academics and there's chinese academics
who's more right who's more or whatever
well you do have the yellow fever so you
probably trust the chinese once more
yeah again with the sexual harassment
very christian of you that's not a
sexual aspect you can have social yellow
fever and just like them or i didn't
even bring up sex okay i'm not i am not
of european descent so i don't know why
you're saying yellow fever when i'm
actually a [Β __Β ] arab shut the [Β __Β ] up
you dumbass
arabs aren't asians you realize that
right yeah well we're not in europe
either
so shut the [Β __Β ] up you can be arab and
have yellow fever
okay
you're literally a [Β __Β ] racist so if
i talk about china
i still want to hear your opinion on the
genocide of the kurds before you call me
a racist
multiple other genocides why are you
asking me about the genocide of the
courage what what about my background
adjustment because it was because
right when you found out i was arab is
when you asked that question so please
clarify
i just wanted to get your opinion on the
iraqi history there since there's some
socialism there as well
but i'm iraqi now too and even if i was
are you from zoltan
cat what would you say about persia
making germany being done by military
force
also thoughts on coca-cola sending
mercenaries to kill union leaders
you meet prussia not persia learn to
read blondie
i said prusa all right prussia
the great state of prussia
um cat what do you say about prussia
making germany being done by military
force that's an odd way to word it
grammatically um
i think that prussian militarism
really had a prussian militarism and the
idea of the sort of military aristocracy
that infected germany even into the
republic was very harmful it was
dangerous a problem germany wouldn't
exist without it that collapsed
arguing for prussian militarism now
weird no but germany wouldn't exist
without that
well you're right but german would have
probably been a collection of more
independent smaller states which isn't
necessarily a bad thing but they
wouldn't be a christian democracy
smaller nations can you hey like bavaria
can be its own
independent nation as well
they want to be democracies well these
people could unify into separate
democratic states
well to be fair before bismarck took
over in the wars of unification
they already were dividing themselves
into a northern germanic states in a
southern germanic states right so there
was prussia in the northern states
and then there were these other german
states surrounded by austria moving on
moving on
i think my german history is better than
you it's a weird thing
just because i don't want to talk about
every possible subject in the [Β __Β ]
wikipedia encyclopedia
doesn't mean i'm dodging it it means you
literally are [Β __Β ] talking like free
jazz
you don't have to talk about every
possible [Β __Β ] thing
that comes to your mind because it's not
[Β __Β ] relevant yeah we could talk
about
the rivalry between the habsburg
monarchy and the prussian uh [Β __Β ]
militarist uh
dynasties we could talk about oh we're
really really can you [Β __Β ] stay on
topic dumbass
can you know the kurds again you keep
refusing to answer that i assumed if it
was a better opinion than they deserved
it you'd probably respond
i'm not going to entertain your racist
baiting nice try
all right so from um so ask the cat
a dude if he prays in public uh i do
yes fake christian
uh excluding yourself who do you think
is the top
five political debaters on twitch
youtube
uh number one is jackson hinkle two
i only named two number one is jackson
hinkle that i know of
uh two caleb maupin they're actually
really close i don't know
um three i don't know i don't i can't
think of anyone else right now
three i'm gonna say zerka on twitch he's
actually
yeah you beat destiny a lot of times
so britney why are western idealists
always
low down misogynists i don't know
um okay i think those are the ones that
we got
there so okay i'm gonna go back to the
ones that we jotted down
um from dylan blay ask has if he will
debate me on theory and which brand of
communism is better marxist leninism
i will yeah we just have to schedule it
i will
okay and let's see here memories of the
future for infrared if when countries
already have infrastructure why build a
new one infrared stop being stupid learn
something no because you have to build
new infrastructure
if the during the passage of time
infrastructure doesn't last forever nice
try dumbass well you said that why are
they building off of the soviet ones
like clearly everybody just builds off
of the infrastructure no because they
can't they're you they're they're still
relying upon that decaying
infrastructure they can't even build new
ones meaning the communists did all that
the economy did all the like stone walls
the communists did the heavy living and
capitalist society is um
taking advantage of the the things the
communists built that's the [Β __Β ]
point all right the soviet union while
it was growing after 28 was just taking
advantage of goods it was no
it wasn't because it actually it
actually realized it actually
industrialized and renovated the whole
[Β __Β ] country what a horrible example
buying french and german industrial
equipment with grain
ukrainians no no no the primary [Β __Β ]
union using the primary of soviet
industries
yeah of course they bought some
machinery from ford and other people
but guess what the bulk of it was soviet
made
bulk of it was german and french no it
wasn't that's a [Β __Β ] lie you just
lying is a sin by the way he keeps
saying that but that doesn't mean
it is a [Β __Β ] sign
from france in germany lying is a sin
saying they got it all from france and
germany's alive
just stealing [Β __Β ] from germany and
check out slovakia to
what did they steal what did they steal
you dumb ass they ripped out that [Β __Β ]
they ripped out
thousands of trains after world war ii
you're talking about after world war
ii shut the [Β __Β ] up
20 to 30 million soviets died in world
war ii of course there was a man
in germany defending itself maybe if you
weren't siding with them oh yeah
the innocent germans were defending
themselves go ahead the innocent germans
were defending themselves go ahead
the polls in eastern europe to defend
yourself and then when the war comes
down you're an absolute [Β __Β ] failure
shut the [Β __Β ] up
why did poland reject the [Β __Β ] treaty
with the soviet union
for a non-aggression pact as security
obviously oh yeah yeah because the
soviet union is going to steal territory
what a [Β __Β ] lie what a cope
so from mri 316 as a christian i
honestly think christian
democracy is gay and somebody also asked
why the cat is so racist
um he's a fake christian
okay and then is it the core above guy
he's really molding a cha
stay mad you are you are giving money to
this filthy capitalist
brittany over here um i hope you enjoy
giving money to the system you hate okay
anyways from
uh diet i don't know one i have to be
really really bad is that okay yeah go
ahead yeah go ahead
um from diogenes for the cat
do you learn everything about politics
from wikipedia
um no however wikipedia is a nice place
to a place to
look for sources now i generally look
for other things encyclopedia britannica
is good
buying books is nice um i just got a
really nice one an amalgamation of
essays from european constructionists
it's pretty fun
um i'm going to push
in the chat again um read that guy he's
great
but yeah i mean there are other places
to get um politics
from than wikipedia i think it's funny
you're criticizing me because it sounds
like i got some information from
wikipedia
when all of you comments actually get
all your entire political philosophy
from [Β __Β ] internet memes
well he's not here so yeah he's having a
cry in the bathroom
we all understand he's playing he's
running away
as jesus said the wicked flee when only
the
righteous follow um
there's another question for him but
let's pull up the ones that we
uh can pull up for you uh from starfish
ask cat why he hates women um
i like women very much actually uh
i've i think i've said some interesting
and
brittany knows i like women um wait the
tsarfish yeah this is our fish guy why
do you like autocracy
you were in here you spent the entire
time bitching about how the fascists and
the socialists need to unite against the
liberals so i mean it's sort of weird
why do you hate women all right so from
memories of the future
for cat does you know how much given by
eu
go back to like i'm just picturing him
in his accent right now
um to eu of course not otherwise he
wouldn't talk
this dumb driver romania's getting a
[Β __Β ] ton of free money from the eu
all right it's it's surprising that they
are handing that [Β __Β ] out
um i hope they continue to do it i talk
[Β __Β ] when i go pee
[Laughter]
okay so from full metal question for
haws
do you think the cat won't turn on their
webcam
because they are too busy waging a ppw
for denmark
yeah i think so it's like of all things
especially if you don't even have money
of all things to chill
like create this larping identity for
germany and ryan cap
wow dude
from g.a corp bob jesus also said
shut up ankloid cat john 316.
um he did not that is
that is not gospel you definitely said
it
shut up mod right you're supposed to be
unbiased [Β __Β ]
all right so from starfish uh
democracy is for cucks who shell for
globalists
also why is cat a virgin at 23.
um democracy is pretty good and uh my
sexual habits are my own and
they don't concern you they do concern
your mother though better watch out for
her what a great christian
because i swear it's going to be like a
racehorse once the floodgates open
there's no stopping me so i think this
might be one of the last ones
uh from pepe sylvia for infrared is it
your idea that consent of
the govern is self-evident if there is
not
a revolution no i'm just saying there's
many different factors there's many ways
to look at it it's way more ambiguous
people do not become an organic uniform
of a state
strictly by means of voting in an
election there's something
more ambiguous going on with that
uh full metal says jesus would turn on
his webcam
um but jesus did not exist in a time
with webcams
tyler darden says cat how did it feel to
get owned
um to be fair i i was hoping for more
all right this was on
this was underwhelming okay so from
skurge god
yo bucket the imf destroyed romania and
the
what is that future view carcass i don't
even know what that says
orphanages wait that's the name of a
city it's bucharest
you can't pronounce it shut up
okay i'm not very good with these
places um orphanages are the legacy of
those crippling loans
uh wait the orphanages are the legacy of
those no actually the like
the reason romania has so many [Β __Β ]
orphans is because the communist
government
banned contraceptives because um they
needed their women to be producing in
their words more labor units
they also executed people who got
abortions although i don't like
abortions
contraceptives are probably important of
course they they
created this failing government-run
orphanage keep scoping romanians
romanians remember it fondly and they
loved the game yeah they really liked
him he made very good target practice
no they like him 50 yeah they liked it
they liked him because he was fun to
shoot in the street with his shitty wife
he don't represent romania keep coping
neither does he he got shot he's dead
now yeah and romania is so great
great off for it um all right so
we can do closing statements and final
thoughts so cat why don't you go first
no i want hey i opened i have to go last
time no no let him go first
no i want i want fine on the closing
statement you made me go first and
you've been
and the mod's been biased this entire
time all right fine fine
do it [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] that [Β __Β ] that no [Β __Β ] you todd
you're pissing me all
your pictures there you go
you forfeited your time or you can get
on music
with the regular chat um
all right so do you want to go or not
cat wait why is he still needed
damn the [Β __Β ] oh todd is so pissy as
well he's still [Β __Β ] biased stop
pissing us off then
you know i i think it's funny all of the
regulars in the chat
oh he's cutting out wait what did you
boot him again todd what's going on no i
don't know
selma i didn't touch anything no what's
going on with the mute
are you gonna go cat or not no no let
him go first he keep muting me anyway so
why
obviously you want me to go keep [Β __Β ]
muting me todd
oh my god you guys okay um
no [Β __Β ] out how's we just go
okay well i'm gonna keep it short
because i think i already won the debate
anyway
um here's the thing i came into this
prepare to debate
about the topic of rhine capitalism
aka the social market economy versus
marxian socialism as
experienced by the people who lived
under that i made extensive well not
really extensive but i prepared more or
less
i researched about the case of east
germany and i really wanted to talk
about that i wanted to talk about the
specifics of that
subject matter i came here and i was
very disappointed to find that cheshire
cat instead of wanting to talk about the
actual topic
of the debate wanted to engage in a type
of debate free jazz
where he flails his arms in every
possible direction
spewing out as much [Β __Β ] as he can
think of
under the impression that i wouldn't
methodically and systematically
deconstruct and absolutely blow the [Β __Β ]
out of every dumb [Β __Β ] point he was
trying to throw in my direction
and despite the fact that i did that it
detracted from the wider aim and scope
of this debate
which was about talking about ryan
capitalism versus marxian socialism
he preferred to talk about samurais and
ninjas
as far as cheshire cat's understanding
of history is concerned
he can only take a very broad view of
things he never actually will debate
about anything in particular and
stick to that particular topic he'll
move
and globetrot around the whole world
just to cope
and save face for his um absurd
ideological pretension of so-called
christian
democracy cheshire cat is clearly unable
to engage with the rich
and deep history of uh
communist and communist statehood and um
he it's also very clear he's a racist
and a fake christian
he's an overall a pathetic person and i
think he forfeits
the debate unambiguously
all right am i not going to be muted for
my closing can i have at least that
todd go on all right
so this debate did not go very well
um so my points have always been
that christian democracy democracy
liberal economics
multi-party democracy and not ignoring
your faith when we move on to the future
because obviously we still need our
connection with god
we'll always be a better path forward
than bolshevism or
whatever the [Β __Β ] infrared is spewing
here
uh infrared has spent most of his time
here advocating for authoritarianism
he doesn't believe that democratic
states should actually
have elections they shouldn't care what
the people think because he knows
that when the people do have a say they
never vote for his type of
his type of [Β __Β ] he spent the times
advocating for the soviet union in china
both states which were anti-worker
anti-democracy
which stopped independent trade unions
which destroyed
independent worker councils because they
hated
the worker and hot and haz hates the
worker as well
my system has led to a
more prosperous uh people the checks
coming out of a socialist [Β __Β ] were
able to create
one of the best countries to live in at
the moment i think they have one of the
highest rates of education
highest rates of transparency and a
higher rates of education and very low
government corruption
um i think my system speaks for itself
while people will always run around and
defend old dictatorships because they've
never had to live under them
and they know that they understand that
they're hard that they're never actually
going to have to do anything it's just
fun to advocate for some long collapse
dictatorship because
it's hard to actually do real policy
like christian democrats have
but in the end i think the world speaks
for itself
when we increase democracy people vote
more in line with my positions than with
houses
that will be the end of my closing
statements all right thank you so much
um all right so
thank you guys for coming on uh i do
have actually some more debates for you
guys that i'll talk to you about but
tomorrow night we got
we have a debate at 7 p.m eastern it's
going to be with bryson
gray and izzy and then i think um i
think jay
dyer might come in on after that to
debate bryson i'm not sure what's going
to go on with that he'll put out an
open invitation but we got a um yes
bryson's also going to be back on
thursday
to debate mouthy infidel then we got
destiny and mio on friday night
and our pop-on panels which we're doing
every week saturday night so if you guys
are interested um they're drinking chats
so people can kind of come on for 30
minutes to an hour
and we just rotate people out and
they've been really fun they go pretty
much all night so anybody that's wanting
to come on to that
you got to message me for um message me
so that we get you on the list because
they get
kind of backed up and then um yeah
sunday night sean last and stardust will
be debating so we got a good week for
you all
uh make sure to uh come check us out we
will be back tomorrow night at 7pm
eastern other than that
we will see you then so good night folks
okay they're off oh my goodness
all right well that was fun
all right see