ICE UPRISING | UNDER ATTACK! | MAJOR UPDATES

I never had to say goodbye

You must have no night

We're going to say

While you were talking about our life

You kept the beauty of

Today

And never in fact

No, never, never, never comes And now, never never never never people love never

You never never start to throw you to you never you'll never see me again

I'm gonna cry for you you never see me again.

I don't know what you'd never see me again.

I don't know what you do.

You'll never see me again.

No, that's going to cry for you.

You'll never see me again.

No matter what you do. You'll never see me again

I'm I'll never come to love.

To love you.

To love you, like, never, never heard you

You never heard you ever

You never heard me

Wake your thighs

You didn't wake up when we died

Since I was blown from the stars

I think the end of the night

behind.

I'm going to see me

like, but never never

time without people

love them like

ever

never never never

ever never stand a third again

and see me again You'll never see me again

I'm going to cry for you

You'll never see me again

I'll never what you do

You'll never see me again You'll never see me again yeah I'm I'm I'm never come to you out.

So never, never, never, never come to out you never never never never never come to out

so tell you never so never never

never never come to up

you know I never had to say goodbye

You must have no night

We were staying

While you were talking about

All night

You kept the beauty of

The living

I never like

No, never, never Never never never Never come

You're never

People love

Never

I know I'm never

Never

Never start to throw you

You never

You never see me again

I was going to

cry for you

You never see me again I'm never going to cry for you

You'll never see me again

I don't want to watch with you

You'll never see me again

I'm never going to cry for you

You'll never see me again

No matter what you do You'll never see me again The The The and the I'm a

I'm

a

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

a

and I'm

I'm

I'm going to see

and

I'm and

we're going I'm like I. I'm going to be. I'm going to

and the other

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm

a

a man

and

a

I'm

a

and a I'm a I'm not

I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I know

I'm

I'm

a I don't know I'm going to be

a man

and a man and the I'm going to be a every that's

a

I'm and and the and the

and

I'm and

I'm I'm I'm I'm

and a and and the I'm

a

I'm

A

A

A

A I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm and we can't be not going to be able to be that we're going to be that we're going to be NRG Blade Runner with the 5. What's up, bro? NRG, Lionel, appreciate you guys.

What's up? All right, guys.

Here we are. Okay. I think the issue should be sorted, but even if it's not, it'll be okay. You know, I got a new modem coming and I have a whole tech team that's going to be coming out to fix this. So hopefully this should never happen again at the very least after today, right?

But yeah, so I spent the last two hours talking to my ISP and trying to figure out what the issue is, yada, yada, yada.

But here's the thing, guys.

I intend to finish the stream that i intended

on youtube oh sos what's up i think that this is going to be an important stream i would like you guys

to remember that you know that guy who does the website he just did the cosmos one this is another

stream you're going to want to upload to that website um hakan right hakan this is another thing

that i'm going to get into tartary i'm going to talk about all the things i wanted to talk about and I want to finish the YouTube stream that I was unable to finish.

Part of that is going to be retreading a little bit, some of the things I talked about already.

And once I finish that stream that I wanted to finish, then I'm going to talk about and cover a little bit.

Some of the retarded things,

Nick Fuentes and other people are saying.

Of course, I'm also going to cover the ice thing.

So buckle up.

We have a very substantive stream to get through.

And let me just tell y'all something about

Hazaldeen when Hazaldean starts

talking about some shit

Hazaldeen's going to finish

what he was fucking talking about

okay? I didn't

finish I'm going to finish what I wanted

to talk about.

You understand?

And I struggled for two and a half hours just to fucking...

If I was a bitch, I could have fucking quit for the entire fucking day.

But instead, I worked my ass off to fucking do this.

Because I don't, because I want to finish what I had.

If I was a little bitch, I would have quit for the rest of the day and said, fuck this and crashed out.

I didn't quit.

You understand?

I'm here to deliver you guys the content that I intend to deliver to you.

End a story.

No negotiations.

No ifs or buts about it.

All right.

With the ICE uprising, the Civil War timeline, it's accelerating.

Nick Fuentes is falling off big time.

You got fucking ratio or one of his

retard clippers. Got

brutally mugged by Jackson in a

fucking ratio. It was one of the most brutal things

I ever saw. So we lost

the YouTube stream. It's gone forever.

Some updates since the last stream. Red Misha,

nowhere to be found, completely missing. That's extremely fucking weird. The only thing more incriminating

than using an AI modified photo of an Instagram influencer and deceiving the world that this was you for years is disappearing for 48 hours without any explanation.

They're in, in Misha's own discord they have left their own discord they've left their own discord

and their discord moderators are currently panicking and trying to get everyone to migrate to a new server.

And I don't know if those mods are themselves feds and they're going to try to pack it up between.

There's something we discovered that we shut down.

There's something we shut down that is even deeper than I thought it was.

Misha should just come out forward, come out in public and be like, okay, I'm a fat guy, you got me.

And they would just be forgotten about, but the silence after 48 hours,

the whole shut it down, shut it down type of thing that's going on, what did we stumble

upon? What operation did we just shut down? Accidentally, by the way, right?

So that is a, that's another update I wanted to give you.

And I am so curious, what is Red Misha going to say?

Like, I want to know.

At this point, I'm at the edge of my seat.

Every time I wake up, it's like,

I check all my messages to see,

like, I'm invested in this.

Like, I want to know what's going on.

Misha's own simps want to know what's going on.

I want to know what's going on. I want to know what's going on.

You know?

I'm at the edge of my seat.

Like, I want to know.

I don't know what's going on.

You know what would be fucked up is if I was right.

And that this is actually a Fed.

And I was right.

And if I was right, what the fuck did we fucking stump?

Like, what the fuck did we?

What is this world we're living in?

Like, every time I catch the feds, I'm like, huh?

Woo. time I catch the feds, I'm always, I'm like, huh? What the fuck?

Like, I'm always, like, so shocked.

I'm like, what the hell?

Even though I shouldn't be, it's to be expected, but I'm like, huh?

Y'all are really?

Like, what the hell?

And then every time they get caught,

it's always like they're retreating.

Like, oh, you got us.

Oh, man.

We'll get you next time.

So, look, the Red Misha saga.

I don't know.

I don't know.

I don't know what's going on.

They're gone.

They're like, they disappeared.

They left that discord.

They're not responding to any of their own allies and friends.

At least as far as I know, based on the Discord activity, at least I could say, they're not talking to anyone as far as I could see. As far as I know, they're not talking to anyone. They are gone. They're gone. Chatji, like this experimental AI was shut down and they are gone. They like pack, they, the, the Peter Griffin meme of them, of him running away from the plane.

That's something. Something like that

happened.

Okay.

Don't, I don't know what that.

This is like lore that should breach containment, to be honest.

This is not niche sectarian tanky stuff although it originated in there

I feel like this could be like a

YouTube documentary that gets like

500,000 views

if someone

actually like made a video about this

and wasn't retarded about it

this would breach containment

like this is a this is like so

it's just like the fact that it's been going

on for as long as it has been

and that this account was like really

gaining prominence and it's like

there's so much mystery

and,

and,

and,

and, and,

and,

and, and, and,

frankly,

okay.

I don't know what to tell you.

So, guys,

the first things I want to clear

before I start talking about

ICE and Nick

Pentes and stuff, I'm going to finish the YouTube talk.

Again, the guy who uploads my speech, my lectures to that website, this is going to be one

of the ones you want to do.

And I hope someone, I hope one of our YouTube guys

MIG, Talin, our great guys

I hope somebody makes us into a YouTube video

I think talent's pretty busy now

but so whoever the newest YouTube

uploader is this would be good to turn into a video

because I'm going to talk about Dark Molly again YouTube uploader is, this would be good to turn into a video.

Because I'm going to talk about Dark Molly again, and I'm going to talk about Tartaria.

Now, the Tartaria meme has been floating in our community pretty effectively, but I feel like memes become more amplified when you actually explain the rational kernel behind them.

And not like, for example, even the agartha nonsense.

And Tartaria is not agartha, right?

But there is like some like schizo- esoteric, like, lore behind that, behind all the memes, right? T right tartaria most of you guys don't even know

what i'm talking about you're just guessing and it's great that's how great that's the how the meme works

it's great but i actually want to talk about tartaria and what it actually does mean and And that was what I wanted to do on YouTube, but I'm going to be doing it now, right? So the first thing is the dark molly thing. I talked about a general...

Master Potato 64, I did five to the war chess. Can you get one of your mods to unbanned me?

Literally got banned for me.

You got banned because you asked for what my ISP provider was.

I found it heavily suss, but yes, we can un-ban you, all right?

But you should, you should understand how fucking weird that was to ask what my ISPann you all right but you should you should you should you should understand how

fucking weird that was to ask what my isp was all right anyway yeah it was just like just use

common sense dude honestly thanks for the five oh thanks for the five thanks for the five thanks for the five. Oh, thanks for the five.

Thanks for the five.

Anyway, guys,

so I was talking about the...

Okay, so I'm not going to, like...

If you already heard the lecture,

I'm not going to, like, drag it on, but I'm going to explain it very simply. Okay, first of all, let's talk about what it means to be a Marxist Leninist or a communist in the 21st century.

Up until the last decade, it meant being a historical reenactment LARPR, who is autistic and has a special interest in a very niche history that serious society and normal society considered outdated and dead after 1991 at least that's what it meant to be

an m l in the 21st century in america at least right so most of the tankies were people that

wore uniforms they wore Ushanka hats,

they were larpers,

they liked the

Soviet anthem

and the Red Army

choir,

and they were

larpers,

and it was

straight up like

an autistic

special interest,

which most of

them had to

supplement

with some

obscure,

like,

anime fetish nonsense to, you know, play into the overall themes of psychosis.

The entire tankie community descends from the autistic LARP.

I was a autistic tankie when I was 13 or 14. And it's okay. It's whatever. I'm not saying this from a position of superiority necessarily. I'm just being straight about the facts of history. This is where the tankie strain comes from in the 21st century. It was an autistic special interest. There was a fork after the rise of the DSA and Hassan Piker and that whole like liberal socialist milieu, the rise of political correctness, the rise of the woke stuff, there was a fork in the road. And some of these tankies

who were part of the Finball autism stuff,

they went and they started adopting the pronouns and the woke stuff to be trendy with the college students and to be in proximity of the DSA and Hassan Piker, I guess.

And, you know, I gave two examples of that. One was the

deprogram crew, right? Hakeem

came from Finbull's server. He was an

autist, special interest autist.

And he, you know,

deprogram through J.T. and whatever you go pink they kind of started orbiting

around hasan pike or to capture or at least make more palpable at the very least

tanky ideas to this kind of like liberal socialist DSA type of milieu and crowd. Although they never went so far as to advocate joining the DSA or voting for the Democratic Party, they kind of started to be the least charitable they started grifting off of it right i think

that's pretty fair to say so that's something that actually happened then on the other

extreme end a lot of them just sold out, like Black Redguard.

Black Redguard was the epitome of, you know, like Maoist autism.

Black Redguard was an autistic black guy who lived in an extremely rich neighborhood.

I'm not attacking him

for that at all, but he,

I'm just saying he would, like, blow up his neighbor's

swing sets because they're settlers.

And it's like, it was extreme autism.

He was, like, famous, and

he was, like, a meme because he was talking about

cracker control and all these other funny things.

Black Red Guard was like a Supreme Autist.

Like absolutely one of these like weird autists, right?

Alongside the whole gaggle of, you know, I'm not trying to insult, but there's Jason Unru, there's,

there's fellow traveler, there's these other kind of people, and it was just like he was one of

these autistic people that were interested in this 20th century ideology. Well, Black Redguard also took the fork in addition to embracing all of like

the 2010s woke nonsense that came from liberal universities he joined the ds a he's like i'm not one

of you autistics smelly autistics I'm one of the cool ones.

I'm part of the popular crowd.

I'm relevant now.

I'm actually part of the world.

I'm actually part of a milieu that's going somewhere.

I'm part of the DSA.

And he kind of like wears it as a badge of honor. Because these, you know know Donald Redditson was not a

tankie but he's also autistic

for sure

he has his own autistic special interest

namely the Mike McNair

you know CPB

centrist

Marxist center crowd,

Lars Lee,

and he's like, well, I'm part of the DSA

because I'm actually relevant.

Like this is, the DSA is basically

attracts like these autistic leftists

who feel like they're stepping out of the anime

wafu pillow basement and entering into the real world and getting serious right that's their way

of getting serious is joining the ds a and becoming professional wearing a suit and tie rather the LARPA jumpsuit or whatever that they were wearing before.

You guys can hear me correct, right?

All right, we're good.

Anyway... me correct, right? Okay, we're good. Anyway,

so, yeah, so there's like a fork in the road, like hyper-autism, which is just psychosis versus DSA opportunism.

And I will say

without trying to sound like a

narcissist, that infrared

was an absolutely

new thing.

Infrared was the

first subculture online, the first movement, which was articulating Marxism, Leninism, in a different way. It combined modern or postmodern sensibilities with a serious, you know, commitment to this historical tradition

without simply, unironically being like retarded psychotic LARPERS doing historical reenactment,

right?

At least what we have is newer. It's more dynamic. It's more

cutting edge. I mean, that's probably why a lot of these people are accusing us of crazy,

oh, LaRouche and Dugan and whatever. I mean, the Dugan thing, I guess there's more truth to it on my end.

But in any case, there's a lot of confusion that infrared causes because of our proximity to ideology that is distinct from

other variants, right? Either the opportunism or the crazy cult or LARPA nonsense, right?

So I'm just trying to, like, give you the history so far of what it means to be a Marxist

Leninist.

And I would say that infrared's special articulation of

which I think is actually Marxism-Leninism

taken seriously

that is a lineage

which

I recently have

articulated and like to call dark Mali, okay, dark Marxism or Mali or dark Mali or whatever you have it. And to explain what dark Marxism or dark Mali is, it is a post ideological understanding of marxism leninism now that's not something i

actually like saying out loud because it gives wrong connotations what what is the problem of

20th century marxism lenism, in both Stalin, Soviet

Union, and in Mao's China.

The problem was

that it was too ideological.

And Marxism is not supposed to be

ideological. Now,

most people who would say this

and nod their heads, I hope you don't, are soy bourgeois

realists who say, yes, let's have soience and neutrality and democracy like Carl Popper or some

shit instead of ideology. But that's not what i mean by ideology i mean something radically

distinct for example i don't think that the islamic revolution of nineteen seventy nine was

ideological i don't think homaini was really an ideologist. I don't think that was an ideological devotion. I don't think Hasbullah is ideological. I don't think the Islamic Republic is ideological. And I don't think contemporary Chinese Xi Jinping thought is ideological.

So I'm defining ideology

in a way that doesn't

immediately make sense maybe,

but when I start elaborating on it,

it's going to make perfect sense to you, I hope.

So what do I mean by ideology?

I would define ideology as a type of idolatry, which affixes symbolic, unconscious meaning to specific imaginary structures including pure form formal narrative structures not narrative logic not logical narrative relationships but a narrative form and an entire universe grounded in a singular kind of imaginary world where there's only an acceptance of the possibility of a specific relationship between unconscious symbolic meanings and imaginary forms. So to be extremely vulgar,

why is Islamic ideology

not really ideological?

Because Muslims can literally

draw cartoons of Spider-Man

praying to Hajj and Mecca

and they see no contradiction.

Muslims absolutely have a dynamic relationship with culture, where the specific symbolic

meaningfulness of Islam is not necessarily attached to a specific imaginary universe.

There's a dynamism of different phenomena of the imagination, so to speak,

Spider-Man and Batman and, I don't know like popular culture

and so on

and so on

and Islam has

this dynamic ability

to be this

unconscious substrate

which articulates

the meaningfulness

of the religion at the expense or through these things even, right?

Meaning there's a symbolic texture that is irreducible to the imaginary form.

Now, that is Islam.

What about China?

Post-cultural revolution, China is the same.

Marxism is no longer affixed to a specific cultural or phenomenal form. Instead, the dynamic, infinite permutations of culture and form are unleashed after Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up, and the meaningfulness of the Communist Party's leadership and of Marxism as a method is a kind of more fundamental unconscious pattern or logic or structure underlying that, which doesn't have to be directly enumerated by the expressions of

consciousness and culture and ideation, even. It's a more fundamental dense texture. So think about the

juxtaposition of the Gucci store and then the Communist Party above the Gucci store. Think about on a structural level what that means for the status of Marxism in China. It's not reducible to an ideology. It's

something post or meta-ideological.

It's above

culture in a way. It's above

ideology. It's not indifferent to culture.

It's not separate from culture.

Especially not in the Xi Jinping era.

But it is absolutely above superficial ideological phenomena, right?

Now, on a moral level, there were two things that helped dismantle communism in the 20th century that came from America, or the pressure exerted by America, at least.

In the post-war period, America became a consumer economy.

Coca-Cola, Disney, you know, blue jeans, Bob Dylan, whatever you want, music, punk rock. There's an incredible dynamism of the imagination and of culture and all the

various different permutations of cultural expression and phenomena in general. And of course,

it's liberal ideology that makes sense of this the most. Liberal

ideology which says infinite openness versus totalitarianism and so on and so on. But the reason America

won the soft power culture war was for a reason because warsaw-packed soviet ideology did not leave room

for the possibility of even entertaining the reality or the existence of alternative even in a Delosian sense, almost meaningless kind of intensities and phenomenal

tendencies, which are not even necessarily ideological

right

I mean

Mickey Mouse twerking

or mini mouse twerking

I don't know

that's not ideological

necessarily

but

it's just this kind of

virtual phenomenal thing happening and just this kind of virtual

phenomenal thing happening

that that shows

just the dynamism

all the permutations of possibility

when it comes to imagination

like it's it's

you don't necessarily you cannot successfully preempt that by reducing

that to your ideological universe you know for example this is what cults do for example this is

also what lindon lorush did right well l Lyndon LaRouche did, right?

What Lyndon LaRouche basically did was that he would say pop music represents this ideological principle, this comprehensive ideological worldview.

Fucking knows as itchy as shit because I'm fucking congested

because I have been spending the past three hours

on the fucking phone. Give me a second.

All right.

All right, hello?

Yeah.

He would say that it represents like, you know, he would say that this song is this evil, or even even evangelicals when they would say Pokemon is satanic

you know these are all different ways of trying to preempt something that is not necessarily

um uh ideological or or or completed at that level symbolically, but represents this kind of pre-symbolic, pure dynamism of phenomena.

Amila, I think you're totally wrong. I'm just going to be totally honest. You're really off the mark. I don't know why you're talking about totalizing. I am not talking about anything totalizing. I am talking about the opposite of totalizing. I'm talking about something fundamentally open-ended. I don't want people to misunderstand what I'm talking about something fundamentally open-ended, okay?

I don't want people to misunderstand what I'm saying.

Consumer culture, American consumer culture, was not totalizing.

It was the opposite.

At least from the vantage point of the Soviets in the Warsaw Pact, it was infinitely dynamic and it represented the kind of irreducible dynamism and an infinite possibility of permutations.

Okay, LaRouche, yeah, that's correct, of permutations, okay, LaRouche, yeah, that's correct, of permutations purely when it came to phenomena or cultural phenomena without necessarily being meaningful.

You know, when right-wingers try to undermine the kind of leftist idea that all art is political they'll like share

some meaningless stupid cartoon that literally means nothing to be like so how is this political

and it's like all art is ultimately political but there is a pre-discursive, pre-symbolic dimension of the kind of meaningless, phenomenal oscillations, okay? Virtual oscillations of the imaginary that just represent this kind of infinite permutation and infinite

possibility right of phenomena of the real right which is unstable by nature and the problem with 20th century

communist ideology is that it foreclosed the very possibility of that. Now, the correct kind of appraisal of

Americanism would have been, yes, we'll accept the dynamism, and through this, we will articulate

the meaningfulness of the communist position, right? This is now what's

happening in China under Xi Jinping, I would argue. But in the 20th century, there was an inability

to accept the very possibility of this open space in the dimension of culture

and this is ultimately why on a moral level at the level of morale soviet culture and the

warsaw pact was imploded from within because all it took was a new generation

to start wearing blue jeans and to start listening to rock and roll purely out of a meaningless

enjoyment that has no necessary ideological content, that actually undermined communist ideology because it was communist ideology that had to impose a very fixed formal notion of meaning upon everything, right?

And this is why America won. America didn't win because it had a superior ideology.

America won because it undermined ideology itself. America didn't win because of a superior

ideology, quite the opposite. America won because

it imposed the real of this kind of spectral oscillations of cultural phenomena that don't necessarily

conclude in anything meaningful, but just speak to the preeminence of the imaginary before the unity of the imaginary and the symbolic right meaning American culture

kind of flooded

flooded their consciousness

of the people with

with something traumatizing right

which is that there's

something that precedes

look cultural phenomena There's something that precedes.

Look, cultural phenomena was a sight of meaning.

It was like an idol for communist states.

So specific movies, specific music, specific whatever. I'm not saying soviet union was this rigid but as far as the foundations of the state ideology yes it had to be and when when when when a statue of Lenin can be juxtaposed with a statue of Darth Vader,

you're undermining the specific kind of horizon of meaningfulness

that regards

the very nature

of statues to lend themselves

toward a specific political

or ideological conclusion.

So this is what it means ideology,

right? It's kind of, America imposed a kind of desacralization of phenomena of stone and steel and and uh of of um of uh what people saw on television and and and and and sound and music a profound desacralization uh happened in the ussr

and the warsaw pact

as a consequence of um of america's soft power, which was

simply a consequence of the fact that America

occupied a position of having more

advanced relations and forces

of production. America represented the pioneer in the

vanguard of an emerging information age and both china and the

USSR lagged behind america in that respect so this caused a cheapening and a dissolution and a delegitimization of Soviet and Warsaw Pact ideology,

which then led to the delegitimization of the political system itself and the state machine itself, right?

So this is a fact.

Whereas in China, a radically different process happened.

China pursued a much smarter path.

Because, listen, in the Soviet

Union and in the Warsaw

PAC, they didn't have a totalitarianism.

They didn't fully close

themselves off to the West. They tried

to have a kind of social democratic

in the spirit of social democracy. We're just going to filter it through our institutions. We're not going to necessarily close off from the West. But what we're going to do is have this halfway ad hoc, constant ideological explanation for everything.

And it was very on a moral level not compelling and convincing.

But China was better because what China did under Mao is they totally insulated themselves from Western culture, absolutely purified themselves

of any kind of Western culture, and on their own discovered how to make meaningfulness out of the

culture, communist culture a pure communist culture right so the 10 year

long uh process hold on that why is there a distraction here?

Okay, we have to get rid of the Spanish pedophile.

You can go in VC, but we don't have Spanish pedophiles in our stream.

Sorry.

Imagine there's like a 40-year-old Spanish fucking weird fuck who like, I don't know.

Yeah.

And you guys are getting distracted by it clearly, right?

Can you guys just take the W that we exposed Red Misha and just move on?

You know, what else is literally like a weird, like, read Misha and just move on.

You know,

what else is literally like a weird,

like there's nothing more to be said.

We literally everything has been said,

right?

So yeah, anyway,

you need to pay attention to what I'm telling you right now

because I'm trying to finish what I was trying to say on YouTube

lock the fuck in right this is important

and some of y'all need to fucking hear this is the problem

because some of you still have the autistic strain inside of you.

You haven't yet arrived at a position of dark Marxism or dark Mali.

And I'm trying to fucking teach you how to do that, right?

Anyway, China insulated itself entirely without compromise from the West.

Also, China had less geographical and cultural and civilizational proximity with America and the West.

So that was an added advantage.

Of course, it insulated itself from Japan and South Korea and so on.

The 10-year process of the cultural revolution, China didn't do this bullshit thing of halfway in between.

They went all the way to discover.

How do we discover pure communist culture, pure ideology?

How do we reflect through culture the purity of the ideology right and this was the experience of the

cultural revolution and the honesty and intensity of that experience the chinese cultural revolution

basically um allowed the

Chinese to discover

the meaningfulness of

communism beyond ideology

by taking ideology

to its extreme most possible

conclusion full

of fidelity right full of fidelity, right? Full of fidelity to the necessity of like

confronting the ideology in its purity without any anything to mute, how should I say, dilute it or something, right?

They finally understood the meaningfulness, a more underlying, unconscious,

meaningfulness behind the ideology, right?

And that unconscious meaningfulness behind the ideology took the form of the repression that followed

cultural revolution i'm talking about the the repression into the unconscious the very memory of the

events cultural revolution remains in today's china something that belongs in the dimension of the unconsciousness of the Chinese people. It has been repressed into the recesses of the unconscious. Because they had finally, because, look, true, I want to explain to me to you, true meaningfulness beyond idols is unconscious.

Real meaningfulness does not have to be turned into an idol.

You don't have to wear the Jason Unru costume.

It's something that exists materially in your unconscious.

Not talking about logos, okay?

I'm not talking about that.

Please don't try to preempt what I'm saying.

Just try to listen to what I'm saying on its own terms, okay?

The true unconscious is where meaning is, okay? Not the superficial kind of oh you know the whatever it's the relation of the

unconscious with phenomena right with with uh sensible or or real phenomena if you don't know what phenomenon is phenomena are the kind of

various permutations of of what we experience right colors sound uh you know shapes forms yeah this is what i mean by phenomena right

anyway um this is something the chinese discovered post ideological dang shalping thought was the first

institutionalization of dark marxism right where they maintain the marxism but they have shed

marxism the dimension of the ideology. Remember, ideology is by nature, bourgeois. Ideology is

bourgeois. So the Cultural Revolution was called the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, but the

kernel of the proletarian logic was the aftermath under dang chau ping this was an

exorcism of the last remnants of bourgeois civilization from the dimension of culture and it was

that but it was in a way that they didn't foresee.

Because ideology, in the form that it took under communist states, is bourgeois.

Ideology is by nature bourgeois.

And we're seeing this today because who is the ideology ideological power of the 21st century it's the USA even in the trump era they still have to warp it with this stupid warhammer whatever ideology it's still an ideology right whereas china and russia are clearly post ideological states now i qualified why i think the

iranian revolution was not ideological because is the the islo the is the homaini islamic kind of outlook was based on a specific

relationship to a structure of the real something real a contact with the sublime, not a commitment to a specific product of thought or a theory or a kind of idea, but a specific kind of ontological orientation, which said this is the nature of being in the real.

This is how the whole cosmos is.

These are the principles governing this kind of more unconscious texture behind the surface of experience right so we need to

understand something to not not confuse what i'm saying with bourgeois realism.

I'm not saying ideology versus bourgeois realism or Reddit.

I'm saying it's ideology versus this more sacred comprehension of meaning,

which is not reducible to the kind of post hoc constructs of modern

civilization, whether those are ideas, whether those are statues or something like, there's nothing wrong with statues and all this other kind of stuff but it's like

modern civilization privileges a specific site of experience as the ultimate horizon of meaningfulness.

But Marxism and this kind of postmodern, in the real literal sense, return to an understanding of a sacred, sacred cosmos, sacred cosmology,

sacred ontology, right? This discovers meaningfulness, not in a specific privileged site of

experience or phenomena, this is basically empiricism but in the

relationality a logic underlying the relationality of phenomena so if you want to think of it like this like

the pattern of how things are interrelated is a more fundamental reality than the things themselves, right?

This is the proletarian logic versus the bourgeois ideology.

This is what China discovered.

This is what was unleashed in 1979 in the Iran-Iranian revolution.

And now we have

to talk about and seriously

engage with the question of

where does that leave a serious

adoption of Marxism-Leninism in the 21st century.

What does that actually mean?

Because it has to be post-ideological.

All the attempts to reduce Marxism-Leninism to an ideology

fall into the two categories I mentioned.

The LARPR, autistic special interest

LARPA, who's putting on a uniform and wants

to do historical reenactment,

and then the corrupt who sell out to the DSA and the Democratic Party in order to be mainstream.

So dark Marxism is basically the response to these two kind of ways that Marxism, Leninism, has been failed by its followers in the 21st century, in a sense, right?

And so today, we have to think about Marxism, an understanding of Marxism that is simultaneously post-ideological, but more in proximity with the sublime.

That puts it in proximity with sacred traditions.

Okay?

Yes, with religions.

I'm not saying Marxism should be a a religion but it is something that um that has to kind of go below

into the uh infernal depths of human experience and history and the unconscious has to be kind of esoterically oriented below the kind of surface of modern civilization.

And because we have exhausted the very limit of what we call modernity, rational, conscious level, kind of rationalistic, mechanical, bourgeois modernity has been brought to its absolute limit.

We're entering an information age that is intensely psychological, virtually oriented, very much rooted in this kind of intensification of subjectivities and more fundamental dimensions of meaningfulness you know thousands of conspiracies are blooming thousands of esoteric

cult like views are blooming right all sorts of different strange alternative medicine alternative religion alternative science everything and you on the one hand someone would say well let's just go back to the

classical modernity it's not possible pandora's box has been opened and there's no putting it back

in the box you have to go through, right?

And how do I propose we do that, right?

Well, we have to, through what I call dark Mali or dark Marxism, integrate Marxism with a more sacred ontological and cosmological framing of all human history and existence.

A Marxism that is reconciled with the fundamentals of what are the origins of humanity and human history.

Not a post hoc institutional kind of academic inquiry into anthropology and science from a distance,

but something where the fundamentals of where we derive our sense of meaning is at stake and is put at stake, right?

Marxism has to have a cosmological dimension of truth. It has to be ontologically true.

It's not a post-talk

construct of a modern civilization,

which we can no longer take for granted

anyway. The

modern subjectivity of someone

who simply kind of

has no skin in the game and looks at and from a bourgeois realist

perspective looks at reality from a position of having no skin in the game is not a tenable or

possible position to any longer maintain.

Now, the Armenian thing that I wanted to show you, and I will really quick, of how I interpret the ways in the late Soviet period.

How was it that they were coping with this kind of infinite dynamism of American culture versus a perceived stagnation or rigidity? And this is a kind of almost

caricature of American dynamic consumer culture right here I'm not

going to show you the whole thing I'll just show you some footage it

this this thing right here. You see this thing right here. You see this thing, monster right here. Look at it.

Ech, it's I.

Vliquy,

Maguchy,

D'

Good

Walsh

Walsh

Eich

Ehe

Eich

Ha

Ha Ha!

And

Gave

Gave Gavar What I So my... Eheha.

Govary, What you'll

you?

All I'll do

I'm

What I'm

What big

To want

So you see this thing

It's like

If you watch this, it's like an acid trip.

He's constantly shape-shifting, nothing is meaningful, it's not necessarily trying to represent anything, actually, just except this kind of infinite permutation of possible

forms and representations

and so on and so on.

It's very psychedelic

and whatever.

But I think this is

kind of the way the Soviet or Warsaw Pact subject was receiving how infinitely dynamic American culture was in all of its possible different permutations and so on and so on and this is kind of a

schizophrenia in a way right and and and this is why deluz is a preeminent thinker of the era the post let's say

post-edipal communist period, right? Which we're in right now in a way.

Because, I don't want to fucking bore you with these

French school terminology or whatever, but the idea

and classical

psychoanalysis is that there's this basic

edible structure that is the

linchpin of how we experience reality,

right? And that in postmodern era

is post-edipal, right? So the

fundamental sources of symbolic authority

are undermined.

And this more kind of...

DeLose was interested in this kind of new kind of...

Schizzoid subject who is, you know, operating directly on the plane of imminence with this infinite virtual oscillations and fields of intensity,

operating at a dimension beyond constriction by specific symbolic universe, right?

Anyway, this is American counterculture and post-post 50s,s 70s whatever this is what happened right and it corresponds to the way

the information age reduced flatly on a single plane right all the culture and phenomena of the world to a standard of information which is how your computers work by the way right

and this is something that destroyed communist ideology in the 20th century. That's what destroyed it.

There was so our task, dark Marxism and dark Marxismism, our task is to rediscover that there was something meaningful that communist ideology was trying to give form to

and all of the songs, the movies, the

art, the statues, whatever. It's like

we cannot return to a universe where that's all that exists,

but we have to rediscover the deeper unconscious We cannot return to a universe where that's all that exists.

But we have to rediscover the deeper unconscious and more fundamental meaningfulness of the revolutionary experience.

Because for hundreds and millions of people, it meant something deeper.

They attached a specific meaning that was deeper than simply the surface.

And this is what we've lost.

And this is what we have to rediscover.

Commit ourselves to the rediscovery of.

And that is not something you do by ignoring the dimension of phenomena and culture and simply

being post-cultural.

And it's neither something you can do by insulating yourselves from the world and putting on a Jason

Unruh costume and LARPing. You have to kind of adopt a relational stance of phenomena to its deeper, unconscious meaning, which puts us in proximity to a kind of Marxist esoterica, you know, which is absolutely forbidden and taboo

according to mainstream traditional Marxists

but these people have absconded

the

meaningfulness of the revolutionary path

they have become

look Vijay Prashad love him or hate him

he's a fucking academic.

He's not a revolutionary.

Janus Verofakis is not a

revolutionary. They have all

lost the revolutionary

dimension of Marxism.

Because the revolutionary dimension of

Marxism, at stake in it is life and death and cosmos itself.

Why is it that in 79 the real revolutionary was who?

Khomeini, Ayatollah Khomeini. Where were

the Marxist revolutionaries in 1979

in Iran? Every single

one of them, in comparison

to the grandness, to the sacredness,

to the power of Khomeini,

all of them looked like these

glasses wearing, academic kind kind of they were weak they were not

really fucking about it i mean really the last revolutionary marxist was kind of chaguarra if

you think about it.

Discounting Mao, of course, because Mao was much broader history than Che.

But the last one was Che Guevara.

The Afghan communist precisely lost because their communist ideology was weaker than the Mujahideen and what it was offering, right?

On a moral level, it was not as compelling and strong for a reason.

Che Guevara was the last one, really, who represented on a moral dimension, the effectiveness and the revolutionary dimension of the Marxist ideology, right?

And then suddenly revisionism kicked in. And then suddenly, I mean, China went its own path, which it was a maturation for sure. But at the level of Marxists not in power, in America, in the West and so on and so on, in the Southern Hemisphere, in the western southern hemispheres of South America,

Africa and so on.

Che Guevart was kind of the last one, right?

So we have to absolutely return Marxism to a more

sacred grounding

just to maintain fidelity

with the revolutionary tradition

the tradition for which people were

giving their lives

and for whom

the entire universe was at stake.

At least they treated it that way.

If you look at the poetry and the music of the October Revolution,

this was not like Black Lives Matter or something.

This wasn't a trend.

This wasn't a fad. This was like an

apocalypse for people. This was like it had this messianic dimension to it, right? Which was

extremely dense at the unconscious level in terms of what was at stake. Compare this to your average

self-proclaimed Marxist today, who's this postmodern ironic subject who doesn't even believe in

anything. They're infidels. They don't even have belief. They don't genuinely believe.

They're missing the dimension of belief. Because belief is a relationship to the real.

Belief is a relationship to the sublime belief is something that compels every fiber of your being in a

specific direction for a specific cause for a specific purpose and this has been lost in the communist tradition in the West.

And so dark Mali, in addition to kind of exploring the more somber and dark side of the communist experience in the 20th century,

also is a commitment to situating and integrating and contextualizing

20th century communist experience with a more universal history of mankind,

where everything is at stake you understand and uh this is my introduction

to tartaria what is the tartaria what does tartaria actually mean so for example most people, and it specifically I chose this term because of the widespread

conspiracies about Tartaria, which I think there's a rational kernel in, and I'll explain what that is.

The Tartaria conspiracy is basically this idea that there's this old lost ancient civilization

uh and and they use footage of the chicago world's fair and other things and the tartarians built

the entire world but and it was all wiped out because of mud floods. So it's just this idea of this lost

civilization of Tartaria. They had unlimited free energy, Nikola Tesla kind of understanding of energy

and electricity and so on.

And it's combined with, it's a folklore.

It's really American popular folklore, really.

Before I get into Tartaria, I want to actually address another thing.

You know, you know, I'm going to say, he could say I'm attacking him, I don't care.

CPI and Caleb Maupin.

They never escaped the LARP thing either, by the way.

This is what I wanted to say.

Because I mentioned the two paths, the kind of LARP are in a uniform and then the corrupt.

Well, CPI, all it did was take the Jason Unru Larp and switch out the aesthetics.

Instead of a jumpsuit, you put on a suit and tie.

And you want a LARP being normal.

You want a LARP being a normal American. That's still

LARP. That's still privileging a specific phenomenal form as the ultimate transcendent sight of

meaningfulness.

This is still in the dimension of autism special interest and not post-ideological dark Marxism.

And infrared has always been distinct from this kind of CPI shit for that reason because CPI is just a different variant of the old school tanky Larp that comes from Finbull's Discord or whatever was in proximity to that.

It just changed the aesthetics a little bit to attempt to be normal without understanding that normalcy is a dialectical relationship between phenomenal things that we experience, including how you dress, what your fashion is and so on and so on, and the deeper meaning of those things.

By simply trying to reduce meaning to fashion and stuff like by doing that you're you're um you're undermining that

relationship and you're producing something rather uncanny something rather uncanny.

Okay? That doesn't look normal. This is also why I fundamentally

object to

some of the tendencies in our

circles, which sometimes say

things like, it's like

you know that the retard, midwit, and then the big brain meme, right?

This is what that is. It's a kind of midwit take. I never liked it. So for the Soviets, communism was theirs. It meant something for them.

For the Chinese, it was

this organic national phenomena.

Let's just have our own American

organic national

experience without this

alien foreign stuff.

And that's so absolutely false because it's precisely the foreign

dimension that gives us a relationship to precisely what i described this irreducible split

between unconscious meaningfulness and the objects of phenomenal experience.

The red star was always something foreign and alien. That's why they chose this as a symbol. The red star, which the Bolsheviks chose from Slavic folklore, was the star of Pravda.

Okay. There was a story of Pravda and Krivda, either sisters or brothers, depending on who tells it, right?

Pravda had this original fullness of radiance on her forehead, right?

Radiance, truth, self-evident truth, basically, right?

Krivda was her evil sister or evil brother, depending on how the story goes, who stole this dimension of self-evident, radiant truth from Pravda, right? This is ancient Slavic folklore. So the red star, what it symbolized was that the self-evident truth, the self-evidently radiant

truth of the world and the universe, was removed from its place place and it was stolen by the empire of lies, by the history of

private property, so to speak, right?

Is how they interpret it.

And the Red Star is the returning of a once self-evident truth to its origins, to its rightful place in the world, right? Which is a kind of imperial principle of truth, right? Not imperial in the loaded

Leninist sense of the word, but in a deeper, more broad sense of the word, right? And the kind of

overall, since ancient history, since assyria and so on so uh why was the star red

instead of looking like uh something like we see in the night sky white or yellow or something because the redness what it signified was this loss

this split of pravda from her own self-evident radiant truth pravda was alienated from herself. Truth was alienated from itself. So the red star is a recognition of this fact that you cannot trust appearances by themselves, that you cannot

console yourself in this familiar, you know, I don't know, Tolstoy, idyllic, as a, you know,

the Russian Revolution is such a fascinating event because you have these evil, Jewish, demonic Bolsheviks, and then the white army, we're so familiar.

You know, the white army is this idyllic, romantic, traditional Russia,

and then the Bolsheviks are these alien.

But why the Bolsheviks

chose the Red Star is because

they're trying to insist on the truth

of the alienation. There has

been an alienation of Pravda

from herself.

Kriveda has stolen Pravda's radiance, and we must take it back, right?

And so I'm trying to say Bolsheviks were not larping to be uh familiar then the chinese by the way way.

Yes, like a foreign celestial body.

Very true.

That's exactly what the red star is supposed to mean.

Then the Chinese, by the way, this story of Pravda and Krivda, probably who it comes from is Lunacharsky. So Lunacharski was the Bolshevik who was responsible for all things related to culture. And then he had his own notion of a kind of the whole god-building cult within the bolshevik party which is misunderstood by many uh to mean we're going to build god it's more like um reinterpreting

various different sacred systems and narratives and religions and traditions through the lens of the kind of revolutionary cause.

And so this was a lunatic, this was absolutely Lunacharsky probably, right, who invented this idea or his department or his people or something.

But anyway, this is the sacred meaning of the Red Star.

This is literally dark Marxist insight I'm giving you.

Anyway, the Chinese, it's much more explicit because the Chinese started adopting Bolshevik songs,

Bolshevik uniforms, Bolshevik ways, aesthetics,

that were very foreign to China.

Okay?

So what I'm just trying to say is that every revolutionary experience in history has a specific relationship with the alien

and does not seek to insulate itself from the alien by just oh we're just going to be see any any pravda who is pretending to be a self-evident radiant truth that's crivda

this is the mark of crivda you understand cribda is the one who stole the radiant star of pravda, right? So the appearance of our passive experience of the world

where we say, oh, this is just the world as we, you know, passively, you're asleep. It's's almost like a gnostic kind of insight like

this over emphasis on americana is crivda it's not pravda it's crivda it's crivda right you are not getting to the essence of America as a nation if you are ignoring

the alien because the essence of America as a nation is alien from us. The Rocky Mountains

are an alien land.

Remember the talk I had with Jackson, how he said, when I was in Kazakhstan, it reminded me of Colorado, reminded me of the Rockies.

Our Tartaria is here.

It's a foreign land that we live in.

It's not familiar to us.

The land we think we know, we don't know. You understand?

So this alienation is absolutely

necessary.

The five points... I think this was Trotsky's

explanation. It's kind of stupid, right?

The five continents.

This is stupid.

It was...

Trust me.

I read a book where they gave the explanation from old Slavic folklore, and it makes

perfect sense.

So... Slavic folklore and it makes perfect sense. So,

yes.

So yes.

That's just like some stupid Esperanto bullshit right Trotsky wanted Esperanto these

oh the five kind it shut the fuck up put it put the fries in the bag it's not what it is

and not talking to you but I'm saying Trotsky is so annoying and all the Trotskyites

anyway uh to continue, yes, so no, we shouldn't try to

deliberately, you know, be, oh, let's just be Americans. Nope, there's no such thing as just american okay because we are

living in an empire of lies so we have to have this dimension of awakening we need our own woke

we need our own kind of red line where we say we have woken up and we're no longer

we're not trying to simulate the slumber of america the dream of america we're trying to

wake up to the reality.

So I wanted to get in a tangent about that as the last part of the ideology thing, right?

So what is Tartaria. Now, Tartaria is...

So I introduced you briefly to the idea of the mud floods and the kind of just the vague folkloric

notion of lost civilization

a lost kind of world empire

that

all of the some of the things we associate with modern

civilization

um you know, strictly speaking, electricity and mechanical civilization

and technology, no, there was a lost civilization that had all of that, right? So this is the kind,

there's so many interesting cultural unconscious dimensions of the Tartaria idea, right? With it, can you please ignore mud floods?

Like, like, unironically, we're not retarded, okay?

There's no mud floods, all right?

I don't care to, if they're well i don't care about that it's completely

not relevant to what i'm saying okay i'm telling you the folklore it's a folklore okay it's a legend

it's a myth but there's a truth behind the myth and this is what i'm trying to explain so recall my earlier

lectures about uh dowla or the revolutionary dynasty recontextualizing marxism in a broader history already has precedent in our community through Michael Hudson.

History has a history between debtors and creditors.

This transcends in many ways the traditional Marxist framework of distinct modes of production, which have their own logic of class struggle. This is a meta-historical understanding of history, according to which it's a conflict between debtors and creditors. Well, another kind of meta-historical conflict, I think Marxism needs to accept dark Marxism, or this is Dark Mali, is the dynastic, the logic of dynastic change as a guiding principle of all historical change, right?

The dynastic logic of revolutionary change.

Which is a kind of more a cosmological

B

cyclical understanding

of his history then

traditional social democratic Marxism

from the second international created a framework

of linearity

right

whereas I hear I'm kind of

talking about something more cyclical

right

a dynastic kind of time

now

let me explain the precedent for this notion of cyclical dynastic history and the precedent it has within Marxism and why it's probably necessary for a Marxism in the 21st century.

So first of all, who was it that in the Marxist tradition talked about the dynastic cyclical logic of historical change. It was Frederick Engels.

In Frederick Engels' description of the changes within the Islamic world, he gives a description

that almost one for one comes from Ibn Khaldun. Ibn Chaldoin

is the one who kind of

creates this framework

that I'm building off of, right?

But Engels supposedly was exposed

to him directly or through second-hand

sources. Engels describes

the process whereby

barbaric, rural, nomadic people

eventually

are marginalized

by a corrupt, sedentary, urban center,

which becomes decadent. And so there's this constant cyclic process

whereby the nomads come and overthrow the center and reinvigorate civilization from its decadent pattern restore equality restore justice restore a notion of egalitarianism and then they become the settled corrupt aristocrats of the sedentary civilization.

And the cycle repeats.

Then there's these new nomadic people, and on and on it goes.

And this was kind of Engels' way of explaining why Asia fell asleep during history.

He understood that this was a principle, that this was a logic that held true for every civilization outside of Europe. He recognized that. But it was his way of explaining why Asia

did not have history. Because it was stuck in this trap that was described by Ibn Khaldun.

Now, Khaldun's description is a little more specific.

Chaldun said,

Ibn Khaldun said that the nomadic tribal peoples have something called asabia.

Okay, assabia is a deeper type of tribal nomadic cohesion and solidarity and egalitarianism and law and justice. Because when you're a nomad and you have nothing

except what you can carry on your back or on the back of your donkeys and horses and camels

the the only real currency that holds is law is honor right that applies equally to everyone regardless of status and uh caldun said that

sedentary civilizations degrade this prior form of solidarity, leading to inequality, corruption, and decadence of culture and dishonor. And there's a cycle, he called it the Daula. The daula for him was a kind of temporal dynastic logic of state power

where the state basically is this organism that has a life cycle just like a human being does. And for Chaldoon, there's different points in the life cycle of the dynastic kind of power, right? There's the early period where Asabia is very strong the nomads have conquered the sedentary armies

they've taken power this is a kind of ascendant revolutionary period right this is the beginning

this is revolutionary period right then toward middle, this is a kind of

Pax, Pax, d'u'llah, right? This is the prosperity, stability, peace. This is the apex moment,

consolidation, right? Then there's the downward trend of decadence, corruption, inequality, injustice, oppression, and so on and so on.

And on, the cycle goes.

And Chaldoon theorized that this life cycle, this was a general life cycle of states and of civilization more generally, right? I'm giving it to you in a very broad and crude way in terms of my description.

And this is what Frederick Engels kind of secondarily describes in his description of the Asianatic mode of production, at least as applied to the Islamic world.

But it also held for Chinese dynasties in India and so on and so on, right?

This general principle of barbarism and civilization and the dialectic of nomadic and sedentery

is a pattern that is recurring throughout all of world history everywhere in the world,

even among the Mesoamerican people. so uh now why does marxism need to expand on this the reason marxism has to expand on this is because classical marxism only regards world history to be as the norm,

you know, this kind of process,

beginning in ancient Greece and culminating in 19th century England.

But now that we're entering a multipolar age,

replete with the various experiences of revolutionary events throughout multitudes of different disparate civilizations, it should kind of strike us as obvious that the trajectory of world history described by Marx and Engels,

which they imported one for one from Hegel, by the way, at least the zone of the development of spirit, that the exception that wasn't the norm that was not the norm of world history so the question is is there a lost lineage of world history where there is. It's not just an endless stasis. And the truth is, yes, there was a world history of Asia. And it's at a larger scale, and it's far more magnificent and brilliant and deep and powerful.

So much so that Europe was a reflection, merely a kind of subjective articulation,

of something happening in the beating heart of Eurasia,

which Europe consigned to the dustbin of a lost history.

This history is a sacred history.

It was lost.

It was lost because it was not regarded as meaningful but it it remains meaningful at the unconscious level of global civilization it's a sacred

history this is what i mean by sacred it's indescribable at the level of conscious, rationalistic kind of European enlightenment. But it's still here, right? So this is what we have to talk about and recognize. And before we start with anything, that is Tartaria.

That is Tartaria.

Tartaria is the lost modernity and lost history of mankind.

Because the process of the step sedentary dialectic was not an endless cycle for Eurasia.

It culminated in a final principle.

What was the final principle principle the final principle was the

world empire of hingis khan that was the final principle after ringis khan it was tamerlane who

turns this notion of world empire into an imperial principle.

And this imperial principle serves as the foundation of the world-defining empires, the Mughals, the Safavids, the Ottomans, all of them are post-timarid empires that are in their own way

articulating like Kodjev's universal and homogenous state in these different distinct forms based in these different lineages of sacred history but they considered themselves empires of the end times empires that will safeguard world history until finally the Eschaton arrives so for the Safavids they are entrusting the world on Iran right for them it's the world history as Iran right this is why they had this kind of nationalism of Cyrus the Great and so on, right?

Sassanians and so on, sassanids.

But the idea is that the Mahdi,

until the Mahdi arrives,

the shadow of God on earth is the Shah.

So the real Safavid flag,

it's the lion with the sun and the sword.

That lion represents the shadow of God on earth,

a kind of custodian entrusted with watching over the earth until the arrival of the Mahdi.

Right? So Safavid Empire was an eschatological empire, okay? The Ottomans had their own eschatology of Rome and of the Mahdi and so on in the end times, especially the late Ottoman period.

Also, Russia. Russia was an eschatological empire under Muscovy.

And these are all post-Mongol, post-timered kind of end of history, but not really end of history, end of times, ontological end

times.

So even more profound than the Fukuyama end of history, right?

And profound than the Fukuyama end of history, right? And so

this is

their

that history of Eurasia that

culminated in this kind of final empires final understanding of this is the end of the history itself the end of the world the end of civilization in some sense that is Tartaria that is what Tartaria really is Tartaria. That is what Tartaria really is. Tartaria is not a particular empire. Tartaria needs to be

juxtaposed to kind of this liberal bourgeois cosmopolitanism, where we have, you know, that symbol of there's one world with the grid and everyone's holding hands?

It's this kind of abstract, open plane. Tartaria occupies this dimension of abstraction, but it's the antipode of bourgeois globalism.

Tartaria is a recognition that all world history bends in a final, yes, universal conclusion,

but it bends in the specific direction of a specific determination of world civilization,

integrating a specific trajectory of world history, that, yes, in some sense, it's teleological, it's eschatological.

It's taking from first principles an original spark, an

original tendency that develops and culminates into something specific, specific form,

and visage of mankind that is what tartaria is a kind of antipode of bourgeois cosmopolitanism

tartaria is an enclosed it's not really an imperial principle as much as it is the immortality and eternity of...

Sorry, I will define Tartaria directly for you tartaria is the full and total integration of all

world history as guided by a unifying imperial principle and this principle the key to this principle what is the imperial principle

what is it it's a specific kind of logos that ibn kaudun was on to describing and angles was on to describing this the cycle of civilization

of the dala right this becomes sublimated after the world empire of Genghis Khan into a principle.

So when it's not just a passive cycle that's happening, that turns into a sign, a symbol.

That is the imperial, that is the meaning of the imperial

should I say

principle right

where does meaning come from meaning comes from the relationality

of

within the symbolic right and a signifier what it signifies is a cycle a relationship or a pattern

so the imperial principle of tartaria signifies the immortality and the eternity of this deeper revolutionary logic of world history,

kind of logos, a signifier of a logos, right?

And so this is what Tart really means um the cycle of civilization just let's just accept

bare bones without getting into it too deeply that there is a cycle and metabolism of what we call mankind's history there's the

inceptual period the revolutionary period there's the consolidation period and then there's the decadence

right if we turn this into a cycle it no consolidation period and then there's the decadence, right?

If we turn this into a cycle,

it no longer has to be so normatively loaded, and we can actually

discover this kind of

cycle as it's a dialectical

logic, okay, of how

the processual logic underlying all things, even organisms in nature,

even geological patterns, even whatever, these oscillations and fluctuations are behind every apparently stable thing in the world. That's just the

truth. Everything is based on a process of motion. Motion has this kind of cyclical dimension. Now, it's not a perfect cycle like an eternal return. It's a spiral, like in a

alien logic, of course. But there is an underlying logos of the cycle, right? And this is kind of the sacred dimension of Marxism that is forbidden, according to Western

Social Democratic, you know, positivist Marxism.

Marxism, in a sense, in a specific qualified sense, does have a metaphysical stake.

It's not metaphysics because it's dialectical. It's cosmological, right?

And Tartaria is meant to reflect or denote or, you know, refer to this kind of,

Tartaria is neither simply a land nor a polity.

Tartaria is kind of this abstract space of all world history.

The total, it's an integral logic of world history.

It's not an abstraction set against the real

cumulative weight of mankind's history it's an integral principle of world history that's what

tartaria is so where where is Tartaria? Well, literally speaking, Tartaria is Eurasia.

But Tartaria is also everywhere where the story of mankind's world history is unraveling. Tartaria is there. We are in Tartaria. We live in Tartaria.

If we regard ourselves as experiencing and dwelling within and partaking in a history

that is the total integration and culmination of everything that has come before.

We are in Tartaria.

And if we can recognize a principle guiding this history, we have entered Tartaria, so to speak.

Because Tartaria is not simply a passive culmination of history.

It's the entire integration and culmination of history as recognized to be to be guided by a central unifying principle

the unity of these two things is tartaria so it's not simply an imperial principle and it's not simply an imperial principle, and it's not simply a land, like a natural land. Tartaria is the unity of both as a fundamental material substance and weight of world history.

Tartaria is communism, in a sense.

Tartaria is communism freed from its abstraction.

If Marx knew that we can call communism Tartaria, he would have.

All he did was distinguish himself from all the self-proclaimed communists.

You know, Marx was not a communist in the way his contemporaries were

at all. He called them crude communists. He called them utopian socialists. The specific way that

Marx and Engels qualified their communism was so specific to them that we could simply say if they had another word,

they probably would have used it to specify that, right?

And such specifications happened organically.

Social democracy happened. They hated that word. But then Marxism, then Bolshevism happened. Then Marxism, Leninism happened. Right? We're not done with that yet. We have to continue. Now, Tartaria must remain a meme because the minute you take it so literally and so seriously,

you enter a kind of cringe Larp, right?

So it must remain a meme.

But do you guys know how there's a meaningfulness of the meme it's not

simply meaningless like what it actually means

tartaria is that the movement of history is not blind.

Now, I'm not done yet talking about Tartaria, because to truly understand Tartaria, you have to go to Alexander Kojev and his understanding of the universal

and homogenous state. Now, for Alexander Kojev, the universal and homogenous state was the

culmination of all modern history and history itself, according to the Higalian. now look cogev was an idealist, okay?

So he was drawing from a Hegelian comprehension of the end of history and of world history itself, which for him culminates in the universal and homogenous state.

Kojev understands world history

to be a struggle of domination

of man over man, master

slave dialectic,

but a process that resolves

itself in an understanding of man's

recognition of what he

truly is.

For Kojev, the essence of man is a self-negate, a substanceless self-negating or self-relating

negativity that is radically temporal and whose development comes at the expense of the natural

determinations of the world. For Kojev, he played specific emphasis on the dimension of desire when you desire something you're oriented

towards something that is not here that doesn't exist that you don't have right for cogev what this

actually reflects is a kind of substanceless negativity at the heart of what propels human history forward

that we can never find satisfaction in substantive determinations that we inherit from nature because our true essence is this kind of

pure abstract negativity this constant negation of nature right so this was why cogev regarded the universal and homogenous state to be the culmination of world history

because in the very bureaucratic emptiness of the modern state the pure form of the law and of right

absolutely indifferent to the various races and cultures and specific features of mankind, that is humanity, according to Alexander Kojev.

You know, Marxists, when they say the bourgeois state is just formal. It's not the content.

It's formal equality. It's not real

equality. Kojav would say

this formal purity of the state

is mankind.

This empty form. That's all it is.

It's an empty form. The content

is not human. it's something that is the loser of world

history right so kojev has this vibe to him where he's like he helped contribute to the e u and cogev regards the end of history to be the rise of

Americanism and then Kojev is very pessimistic in his step forward about how he speculates

the man under the end of history he says man will become an animal because we all of our

rights are being recognized by the universal and homogenous state. So there's nothing to live or die

for anymore. We don't have to prove our humanity anymore through war because the universal and homogenous state attends to our

real ontological humanity. So what Kojev basically concluded from that is that all that remains

is our animal existence, which Kojev interpreted through the rise of consumerism,

passively fulfilling our sensibilities, our senses, our consumption, food, hedonism, entertainment,

and Nietzsche's last man,

basically, right?

The spiritual dimension of mankind

is already satisfied.

So all that remains is just passively attending

to our animal side, right?

Which is just the kind of past... So Kojev, of course,

didn't live to see Gamergate. So he was so wrong. He's so wrong how all, even at the

level of consumerism, how much is at stake, how much meaning people attribute to these objects of consumm? They give them a transcendent status where they're no longer consuming Pokemon. Pekajoo reflects their very ontological dignity as a man or as a woman or as a transgender as a fat lesbian, disabled, trans-beian. I don't know.

He could not foresee this. This is precisely what Alexander Kojev couldn't foresee.

This whole notion of we're just

going to become harmless, passive

human animals. Absolutely not. That's

not what happened.

Instead, the dimension of

zero stakes

consumerism became a site

of battle and struggle again. Now we have the dimension of

information warfare. Also another thing Kojev couldn't foresee, but he should have through

Carl Schmidt, the rise of partisanship, global heterogeneous partisanship versus the global 9-11, basically, right?

Terrorism, irregular warfare, or in a non-bad guy way, Hezbollah, right?

So... a non-bad guy way, Hezbollah, right? So, now, something Kojev did not do, he was too presumptuous.

He's a brilliant thinker, of course.

But Kojev, his central presumption, which was false and which was wrong.

I have a fucking headache.

Oh, my God.

And I'm all out of water, too.

His central presumption.

Was that, um, you know, guys, honestly, I'm not even going to lie, like, support the stream for sure.

Like, straight up, guys.

I went out

an arm and a leg

for you. I'm literally dying right now.

Anyway, you can wait, though.

You can wait till I'm done.

Kojev basically was too presumptuous because he didn't understand how this universal and homogenous state comes to affect itself and acquire self-relationality.

So my essay about Alexander Kojev and the Russian Special Military Operation was exactly about this, that I submitted to Red America.

The universal and homogenous state is not simply a passive receptacle of universal recognition.

It itself becomes a thing that must relate itself to itself.

And how does that happen?

Through Bolshevism.

Kojev collapsed the Bolshevik revolution and the French Revolution.

Wrong.

The Bolshevik Revolution and the Chinese Revolution were delayed delayed meaning they did not have a real bourgeois revolution

of the pure form of law and universal state they had to regard the universal state itself as an aspirational object to fulfill and achieve within this

wider schema of achieving communism but in doing so they came to regard the universal and homogenous

state as a determinate thing and this temporal

historical lag created a logic of self-relationality of the universal and homogenous state in

communist states that did not exist and does not exist in liberal democracies only recently we have this thing all the paradox of tolerance how do we now the west is starting to think about that and it's affecting the west for sure what is the

content of liberal democracy but this is something directly the bolsheviks and the chinese had to deal with

because they had to

create a

universal and homogenous state intentionally

in order to

kind of create a scheme

of

stages

where they will eventually succeed it, right?

Amilo, what's up?

So put it this way.

The universal state was a byproduct of bourgeois enlightenment and bourgeois revolutions.

But for the Bolsheviks and the Chinese, it was an intentional

goal that they gave parameters and definition, and thereby created a logic of self-relationality.

And this logic is precisely the distinction between proletarian dictatorship and bourgeois principles of statehood.

Because in the relationality, self-relationality of the universal and homogenous state, the communist rediscovered Tartaria.

They rediscovered Alexander Nevsky. They rediscovered Isaac Ivan the Terrible. They rediscovered

how their own history is a battleground, replete with meaningful determinations.

Phil Foe.

Once you take, see, you know my problem with the traditionalists like Renee Gwynon and Julius

Ivola?

The problem with them is they create a dichotomy between abstract bourgeois emptiness and the wealth of particularity and substance and content.

But the only way to reacquire substantiality and materiality and culture and determination and particularity, you don't oppose some kind of empirical substantiality versus abstract bourgeois law. You don't do what Nazis did and say,

ah, we are the master race. We are the blood. We are our Germanness and our German blood.

Let's jack off ourselves for being German, Aryan, whatever. You know, the problem is that German,

of course, there's many problems, but even by its own logic, German kind of revolt against the

modern world simply took the very logic of bourgeois modernity

and applied it to racial determinations or perceived racial determinations and so on and so on.

They never escaped the one-sidedness of bourgeois modernity,

where this is the pure form, and it by itself is the thing. It's a pure form that you can posit in

front of you, and that's the thing now they turn that into the

aryan race and the germany or whatever but the real way to return to the sacred and the

sacred cosmos is to yes accept the abstractness of modernity, accept that, and then simply insist that it's consistent with itself.

Give it a dimension of relationality and thereby give it the restore to it the dimension of the logos once you do this suddenly there are other patterns and relationships across history that illuminate the determinations of your pre-modern past.

And what, see, like, Alexander Nevsky was not intentionally trying to be a, you know, a mythological, legendary, whatever, it's like

there's a deeper

relationality here.

And the terms of any...

Of course, the terms of the relation

is a meaningless abstraction.

But that's precisely what abstraction is. To abstract is to take

something out of the context of its relationships, right? So the real rediscovery of pre-modern

sacred cosmos comes not when you reject modernity,

but when you impose upon modernity the kind of self-relationality,

that's what gives it determination. Remember Hegel's logic.

Hegel's logic,

it doesn't begin this way, per se,

but it's known as beginning with being and nothing.

So you begin with being.

Okay, well, being actually turns out to be nothing.

Well, nothing actually turns out to be being. So being and nothing keeps sliding in and out in between each other, right? Okay, then for Hegel, this sliding in and out of each other of being and nothing is becoming and becoming

hagel takes to the next stages this is being determinate so how does being acquired determination

for hagel in itself relationality it acquires determination. It begins as an abstraction,

being nothing. It's the same. Being nothing, being nothing. Then he identifies that there is a

relationship here that's becoming and becoming finally gives being the quality

of determination it's a something now you see being doesn't become something until it's becoming

so this is the dialectical logic that is baked into Marxism. And I apply this to

Alexander Kojev's universal and homogenous state. The universal state becomes its opposite, and in and out and in and out, right? Until finally we can notice a relationship

or a pattern of becoming, right? Finally, we can identify a determination, specific Chinese logos,

specific Russian logos, and so on and so on a pattern that

illuminates forms and determinations previously taken for granted but which actually were there all

along within your civilization.

So ones if that makes sense to you.

Oh, fuck.

Guys, I, you know, this is, I didn't do this stream to get views or something.

Yeah, you guys have no fucking idea what I'm talking about.

All right.

Well, whatever.

Worth a shot at least.

Fuck.

Barnaby with the five.

What's up, bro?

Appreciate you. man, I have fucking crazy ass headache. Holy fuck.

So, look, Tartare so look tartaria is the universal and homogenous state that finally acquires particularity if you want to think of it in that way

and uh it's kind of if you want to think of it in that way.

And the kind of post-CoJev Marxism.

John, what's up?

Dark Marxism, right?

The whole purpose of dark Marxism is think of

Kouchev's universal and homogenous

state. Scotty, appreciate you, man.

Think of Kouchev's

universal

and homogenous state.

And state and think of that as the ultimate source of light and illumination.

Kojev's universal and homogenous state neglected and ignored the dark dimension.

Dark Mali

is the

dark side of the universal

and homogenous state.

What is Tartaria? Tartaria is a shadow empire of the universal and homogenous state.

Repeat after me. Tartaria is the shadow empire that follows the universal and homogenous state.

It's a shadow empire.

A shadow empire that can only be illuminated by a red star by the star of pravda clenched out of the hands of criv right? For as long as Pravda's star is stolen by Krivda, right?

Tartaria is a shadow empire.

Only the red star

illuminates Tartaria.

Do you understand?

Fuck.

All right.

Now let's cover

that Nick Fuentes

we go from this to that

holy fuck

let's cover that thing from Jackson

or from

I have some more updates to show you

to be honest. This is the most brutal

Mog I've ever seen.

So look at Boy Wonder Nick Fuentes,

Crash the fuck out.

This is hilarious.

And then I have another thing to show you as a follow-up from that

person. You know, Eddie, what's up, bro?

Appreciate you.

All right.

Yeah, this is some shit you guys should see, too.

All right, Nick Fuentes is soying out and crashing out because he's just, his general

rational run is over

and he's crying and he sounds

so fucking pathetic and he's trying to

sound like strong and tough and it's just

really not convincing

let's hear boy wonder Nick Fuentes

fuck them

fuck Jackson Hinkle.

You fucking traitor midget.

Fuck you.

You traitor midget.

No, they actually like do what...

This is how Nick Fuentes sounds.

Fuck you.

You're like hearing his voice this profound, like, estrogenic weakness.

Fuck you, you train her midget.

He's, like, trembling in his voice.

Shut the, put the fries in the fucking bag, buddy.

Shut the fuck up.

Fucking washed up, bitch.

He lives in Russia.

He's never met a...

He lives in Russia.

A black person's dick that he hasn't fallen in love with.

He's over there.

You know, he's saying all these

really graphic, visceral things. Then we hear Kanye West release that thing about his cousin. Then we see

the photos of Nick Flentas in Kanye West. Then I wonder how much of this is direct literal projection.

Burkina Faso.

He's over there in Burkina Faso, blowing their warlords.

You see these kind of key terms he keeps using?

Why does that come to your, what's going on here?

Talking about, you know, a raised black fist.

Oh, Burkina Faso is standing up to the west.

Burkina Faso, fuck you, race trading scum.

I don't know.

The vocal inflection here is just like very weak.

It's just like, it's like it's so impotent sounding like, fuck you race trading scum.

Did you guys notice that?

It's like there's no real, this is not

like compelling to anyone.

It's just so like impotent.

It's such impotence, really.

Fuck you, race,

like, he can't even like pretend to be

angry because there's no actual authentic

indignation here. He's like trying to be angry because there's no actual authentic indignation here.

He's like trying to be like, right guys?

We hate black people, right?

But it's like, there's no authentic indignation here because he knows he's morally like, yeah,

he's morally in the wrong and morally outpaced by Jackson.

What the fuck did I do?

Put that back.

Trader rat.

The guy's over that literally, he's in Yemen, where they're stomping on the american flag and you know what

like obviously i'm against israel i don't know that i'm going to yemen with a bunch of towelheads

saying death to america stepping on the flag i'm not in Burkina Faso in Venice.

You didn't get invited, you fucking bitch.

Who the fuck invited you?

I'm not.

Who invited you?

Who invited you?

Did anyone invite you, you fucking loser?

Nobody fucking wants you. Yeah, you know what? The Yemenis

want a Jackson to be the representative of America. If they wanted a representative from Mexico,

they'd call a Mexican. You didn't get invited, Nick. You're not the king of the white people

that's just the thing

in their eyes you're not the king of the white

Americans

giving tongue service

see these

and you know you hear the things Kanye says

it's like this guy was hanging out with Kanye as close as he was.

I don't know, like every time I hear these visceral graphic depiction, I'm just thinking, projection, projection.

Because how do you even imagine this shit, right?

Giving a rim job to these

third world. That's so specific.

It's crazy. World pieces of shit

that hate us.

Look at him like try to pretend

to be angry. It's really pathetic.

You don't have to do that to

criticize Israel. It's insane. So, I mean, I'm so sick of it. I can't even tell you. We have to draw a firm line. Who asked you? Who the fuck asked you, little boy? Little fucking midget boy?

Who the fuck asked you anything?

I am sick of it.

Did anyone ask you, bitch?

Yeah, Jackson is the representative, the real representative of America.

He's meeting with the true allies of the American people. Are the American people not allowed to have friends and allies?

Well, he's meeting with them.

And you're not.

You're sitting and getting paychecks from Netanyahu in the fucking gold, whatever, Mark Levin, gold business.

I'm not anti this, anti that.

I'm pro America. I am pro

America. I am anti-mass migration.

I'm anti-

You're pro-

regime. You're not pro-America. You're pro-

regime. We know you're a regime shill.

Israel. I'm anti-Brikan Afaso. I'm anti-Russia. I'm anti-Emmaritz.

Eat a fucking Oresnik. I'm anti-Russia. I'm sure Russia's crying. They don't have a fucking cat boy on their side.

Iran, Israel, Venezuela, Europe, I'm anti all of it.

I am pro America.

If anything, I'm pro Europe.

At least they're white.

So I'm just, I can't stand it.

I can't tell you how much it bothers me.

We're being subsumed in this.

Think about the alternative.

You're being subsumed?

You mean your audience is losing?

You're losing your audience?

You're going to keep losing them buddy

you're fucking out you're gone you're done

you're washed it is disgusting

it's this guy

where is this like what is the moral

ending I just like

this is like

what's this is so fake

and performative like what do you mean he's like pretending to be like

morally indignant why are you talking about morality dude you're literally like a pro pedophile

selling Jeffrey Epstein fucking shirts saying Jeff's effstein was cool, denying

he was a pedophile,

justifying regime interventions,

regime change interventions

to kill and slaughter civilians,

and then

celebrating the regime killing U.S. citizens.

Where's this moral high ground coming from?

Because it's certainly not from his height, which Jackson proved, thankfully.

So he goes, Jackson's a midget.

And then look how Jackson ratios him.

Uh-oh, it's so over.

Oh, no.

If Jackson says I'm a midget, what does that make him?

How do you respond to this?

And look at this Destiny

5-8

shoeless

and then Nick

Flentes you can literally

see him standing on his

tippy toes

and his little insoles and these shoes he's wearing.

But you know that, uh, it was proven that he is wearing insoles. I could show you if you want.

You want proof Nick Fuentes wears insoles?

Could show you. No problem.

Let's find it.

Where he's sitting next to that one guy right here.

Yeah, Nick Fuentes wears insoles, by the way, because this guy is 5-8.

Now, his shoes he's wearing could be no more than one inch or one-and-a- 5-8. Now his shoes he's wearing

could be no more than one inch

or one-and-a-half inches, right?

He's 5-8.

He's the exact height of Nick Fuentes,

and these shoes are like

three-inch, two-and-a-half

to three-inch lifts, right?

That Nick Fl Fuentes is wearing

and and

this guy's 5-8 so the only

thing that could actually have propped up

Fuentes to be

this tall next to destiny is that he's

wearing insoles

saying who cares how tall anyone is?

We have never cared.

We have never cared.

But their community, it's the biggest

moral thing for their community. You understand

that. John Doe, what's up, bro?

For their community, it is like, if you are not tall, for them, it's like the worst, because they're, like, in-cell, black pill or whatever.

And that's why Nick Flenta is calling

Jackson a midget. He called me a midget.

It's midget projection.

As a matter

of fact, we don't care how tall

anyone is, but they are extremely

insecure about the fact that they

are a mini munchkin bunch, okay, which I just showed you.

I could show you again, mini munchkin midget projection.

And look, this, I don't know if I showed you this. I'm going to show you again.

Okay. Do you want to know who this guy right here is wearing the beard on the left? That's Beardson.

Remember the guy who came in my space and tried to argue with me?

He kept calling me short and stuff.

You realize he is probably 5'3?

Okay, that's him right here.

Next to the guy on the left.

You see, that's Beardson right here okay so we don't

care about these things i mean are you stupid of course you don't care i'm not a tall person all right

a lot of people i don't respect are shorter than me sorry a lot of people i respect are shorter than me. Lenin was pretty short, right?

I literally don't, I'm the last person to care, but they care a lot, like a lot, like a lot.

And they're constantly like talking about it. And it turns out it's just complete

projection. Like way worse than anything anyone could imagine.

All right. I want to follow this up and show you. Remember that

weird guy I said is either a Fed or he's going to tell you to get arrested?

Apparently the Antifa captain that I've never heard of from TikTok is now on the run.

The video I posted from the Alex Preti murder calling for direct action, calling for boots on the ground, calling for someone to stand against these murderers was deemed inciting violence and you know they're

they're being bullied by the administration clearly I don't think that they're

gonna let him take my account on but I don't know what they're gonna do man

they're gonna silence me somehow and they're having a hard time putting a bullet in my

head so we shall see what they do to get the job done.

I go back and the account in my bio. I am

basically on the run now.

You know, I have safe places

and I have evacuation.

What do you mean you're on the run?

What?

It's planned out, but the way things are going,

I'm going to have to be very resourceful.

And that's going to take support.

So, you know, thank you, thank you, thank you a million

times to those of you who have. We were able to deploy over a hundred gas masks on the streets

in the last couple of days and help a lot of people probably even save a couple of lives

with the amount of CS gas they've deployed.

As I've said a million times, I'm going to stay in this fight so they're bitter,

and I'm not going to run away, but I will need some help. You know, You either listen to me or you listen to these people who are on the run.

Okay, it's your choice.

Do you guys want to see the ACP form?

It's not the final form.

Everything on it's going to be wiped.

But I don't know if dark should i can i show them can i show the forum

i've been posting on it

i can show them been posting on it.

I can show them.

All right.

All right.

So here's the forum. so everyone's saying red misha is gone but there's a new red misha red misha too

and this is red misha too right here um this is like this is going to be wiped this is not our forum this is like

this is going to be wiped

this is not our forum

this is just like a beta

for testing basically

so we just like shit post

and post whatever we want on it

right

um yeah so there's uh

someone took my diet mountain dew.

Oh my God, who's, who is the mysterious retard 27?

Oh, no.

How do I wipe my ass?

Great question.

So that's Red Misha too.

He's on our own social media platform.

Again, you can just shit post.

I mean, you can't join it yet.

We're testing it.

And I just wanted to overload it with like a bunch of shit just to

like, because Dark said we should

just to test it.

Um,

yeah.

How do you like the site guys

it's pretty cool huh

everything you just saw is going to be wiped

um like the data will reset everything you just saw is going to be wiped um

like the data

will reset so don't worry

it's not going to be like retarded

we're not going to have stupid shit on it it's just

I'm using stupid I'm

posting like retarded shit just to test, like the site functionality.

Pretty cool, huh?

Ha ha ha. All right. all right this form is really it's like a Reddit X combination

it's pretty cool

can't wait till we're all on it but nobody's like

interacting because nobody

who's been given the invite is using it

everyone should start using it

we need more people to use it in higher volumes

before we roll it out to everyone

we write is better doubt it

doubt it Uh-uh. Uh-uh.

Uh. So true. You're talking, You're talking about Minneapolis.

Of course I am but not today

I can

I think everyone should give me

10 to 20 subs.

Everyone should just pitch in one.

If everyone pitched in one, think about that.

All 400 people.

Just one sub.

This is a highway extortion.

It's a robbery.

Because I'm totally not going to just end the stream after you donate.

Totally not going to end the stream.

Totally going to keep going.

God, guys, I am literally dying.

I am so fucking exhausted.

Mortor with the five, what's up?

Lecture was hard to follow, huh?

Fuck.

Well, think about it like this, guys.

I give these lectures off the top of my fucking head.

Okay?

I don't have scripts.

I don't have written material.

I don't have...

Upscrolled?

I'm not gonna fucking get an upscrolled, bro.

I'm just telling you.

Yo, Dictator, appreciate you, bro.

These are not easy to deliver, but, you know.

Scotty, thank you, bro.

You know what, guys?

Thank you so much.

I appreciate you all. Appreciate y'all.

Breaking commies, heck off. You know, Why? Can someone tell me what the fucking point of the penguins are?

It's the French Communist Party.

The penguin is suicidal. Can we stop?

The penguin is bad. Fuck the penguin.

It's the stupid, like, cringe, fascist suicide worship.

Because all these people are crybabies.

Just want to kill themselves.

Son of our business.

It's so... I remember I saw a post. It was like

the non-whites will never understand the beauty and mystery and romance of suicide.

And why we...

Y'all are just killing each other as like an artistic statement or killing yourselves for an artistic statement.

Blunt, what's up? It's like, that's not deep.

It's just like you're just a fucking miserable

bitch.

You're just a morally corrupt, decadent, filthy

fuck.

It's this moral, deep, moral, evil

corruption that

makes these people inclined

toward that and they're confused

beauty and romance. Shut the fuck up.

You just don't have your shit straight.

You don't know what to live for. You're fucking

you're lost. All this

fascist sadism shit, it's just suicide.

That's all it is.

So true.

It just ends with Hitler.

Hitler killed himself, right?

Oh, the mystery and beauty.

Shut up.

Just shut the fuck up.

So sick of these stupid, fake, bap, retard.

And now the Fentes people are larping this.

They're like, we're these French artists.

Like, fucking, fucking...

This is like a noir existentialist

Camus film. Right?

Shut the fuck up.

Literally shut the fuck up.

There's different types of LARP, guys. There's different types of LARP guys.

There's different qualities of autistic retard LARP.

There's different dimensions of it.

Well, the French thing says when he leaves alone, we stay together.

Okay. i'm not getting in my steps in for today.

That's for sure.

Oh my God.

I am not getting cardio in today.

I'm going to become fat today.

Guess how many steps I got in today?

245. I'm done with this fucking stream.

All right?

You guys can support me another time.

This is crazy. 245 steps for the entire day.

I'm getting the fuck out of here, all right?

But if you end up donating after I end the stream, you're the, you're so cool.

Let me see something. You know, All right. All right, guys. We're ending the stream. Bye-bye.

I hope you found it useful.

I'm literally about to collapse and die.

Bye, everyone.

See you guys.

See you guys around.

Maybe tomorrow.

Possibly tomorrow.

Bye-bye.

Good stream.