🔴 RED NEWS | TRUMP ASSASSINATION?! | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATESH

But she in me walked.

dancing.

Dancing soldiers, let's roll.

Dancing soldiers, let's roll.

You ain't fuck with me, cause I'm loud and I swear too much.

You bitch!

Yeah, I can be professional.

Guess what?

Nobody said keeping it professional.

You gotta be a fake fuck.

Keep it real.

Doggy dog world people.

Likes.

Then the stream started.

Simple.

One and more likes and we start Sonic.

When Sonic starts, you know shit's gonna be real.

When Sonic starts,

You know she'll son of your real.

Don't want to change the song 20 likes.

But this song goes out.

It's a good song.

This is a good song.

Up and they can fucking meet.

Hey yo, what's taking y'all so long?

Yo, what's up?

Wake up, everybody.

It's late.

I'm just kidding.

I'm not going to be too loud.

I'm not going to go full cycle mode.

What's up, everybody?

How y'all doing?

How y'all doing?

How y'all doing?

I need a ten.

That's all right.

What's up guys?

I have a lot to talk about for this stream.

And why am I bringing that up?

Because the next time I stream, I will not be here.

In this room.

I'll be in a different room or I'll be outside in Moscow the next time I stream.

Which is sooner than you think.

Alright?

Much, much sooner than you think.

So this is uh I don't even I didn't I had to squeeze in this stream.

I didn't even have a lot of time for this stream.

And one of the reasons for that is uh you know, I preparing and all that kind of stuff.

But another thing is that

Let's talk about the whole Collins stuff because a lot of you guys don't understand it and you can't see it.

So, if you need a background check, there's a philosophy professor.

I don't even know what this guy teaches.

It's baffling to me that he teaches anyone in any capacity whatsoever because he's just not very educated himself.

But anyway, it's this.

this philosophy professor who's got a bone to pick with us, the Midwestern Marx and ACP and Infrared and me personally.

And I just don't I didn't understand what this guy's fucking problem was.

I'm like, what

Who the fuck are you?

Like, this guy came out of nowhere and he's solely like gotten followers on the basis of like attacking and obsessing over us.

So I'm like, who the fuck is this guy?

Right.

And then I do, you know, I have people let me know and stuff.

And he is a Gabriel Rockhill protege.

So Gabriel Rockhill is the head of the education department in the PSL.

So it seems like this was like a, they, this was ordered.

This is the PSL thing, basically.

As soon as ACP came out, the PSL was like, all right, we have to do a coordinated attack.

We got to fucking like.

So when I found that out, I was like, all right, if this motherfucker ever, ever responds to anything I ever post on X, I'm going to just fucking nuke him out of orbit ruthlessly.

I'm going to send them a message.

I'm going to send PSL a message.

I'm going to send Gabriel Rockhill a message.

Don't fuck with us, bitch.

And I want to tell you who your chairman is.

Guerrillas and comrades in the ACP.

I want to tell you who your chairman is.

All right.

Over the course of a weekend, I produced 20,000 words nuking this guy.

I was so vicious.

I have a bloodlust kind of predatory instinct when I can, when I decide to set myself to that bloodlust, predatory instinct, when I have an opponent, you know, especially in the written format, I go full Volk Vulture fucking psycho.

And I could potentially do it without limit, meaning I could quit streaming and write hundreds of thousands of words nuking one person just to mentally and psychologically destroy them.

Right, I have people don't understand that they think I'm just a streamer, they think I'm just a live streamer, and they try to use that to denigrate me.

They don't think I can polemicize in the written form.

That's not true, okay?

I prefer live debates, especially ones that are streamed, because 99% of these fucking people are piss ants who are not worth my time.

One person doesn't deserve hundreds of thousands of words from me.

I can humble and nuke literally anyone, right?

But it's just like, are they worth my time?

And if I was a nobody, and by the way, I prefer, why do you torture the con guy?

Well, I'll get to that, right?

I'll get to that because

You may not know this, but if he just agreed to a live debate, I probably would have been super charitable.

I would have been super understanding, super charitable.

It probably would have gone like the Daniel Tutt thing, where I just like, I just like let him say his piece, and I would, in good faith, you know, respond and explain my position.

And, like, because I personally have nothing, I don't even know who this guy is.

I have nothing against him personally.

And by the way, you know, I was seeing some stuff like, you know, he's got family problems or whatever.

And it's like, I don't care about that.

It's just like, I don't even know who this guy is.

All right.

Um, I just think he's conducted himself in extreme in an extremely dishonorable way.

I think his pretensions to Marxism are completely false and bankrupt.

And he's a little bitch, straight up.

Just like straight up, he's a little bitch.

It's not even personal.

Like, I don't even know the guy, but how he has behaved, he's a little bitch, straight up.

Because, like, we told him, like, just do a live debate.

It's a day, it's like two hours, three hours, and then we'll see.

You know, you're making these claims that the chairman of the Communist Party doesn't know anything about Marxism and he doesn't know anything and he's stupid and all this kind of stuff.

Put it to the test.

All you need is two or three hours of a back and forth, and who can recite what off the top of their head and who can engage in what re like that's all it takes, right?

But he's like, no, you need to pay me.

It's not worth my time.

Meanwhile, the guy has like spent like a dozen hours trying to like write about me, right?

And then, like, this morning, he uh he so we were doing a back and forth.

And basically, let me explain it to you if you haven't read all of it, but I recommend you do because there's actually a lot of educational content in there.

Basically, Colin has this idea.

That communist states had open borders.

And then, when he realized they didn't have open borders, he said it was just for security purposes.

And if it was just for security purposes, why is it that between socialist countries, they were still extremely controlled and restricted borders.

And in terms of the internal migration in the Soviet Union, where everyone was issued who could travel, that is, was issued a passport with their literal ethnicity on it, by the way.

And you couldn't just go and live wherever you wanted.

You need to have a job secured and a place of residence.

And granted, that's true in the United States as well.

But the difference in the Soviet Union is you had to go through the government.

It was all planned.

It was an integral kind of state socialist planned economy.

So it wasn't like a matter, it was all carefully planned on a social basis.

The social implications were taken into account, besides the, you know.

The nepotism and the minor forms of corruption.

Yeah, it's not even necessarily corruption, you know?

You don't speak for the proletariat and don't even know my position.

Who the fuck is that?

Alright?

Is that Colin himself?

Anyway, um, so Colin has this idea that because this is why it's a little frustrating.

It's a little frustrating.

Yeah, I I I guess the vegan can come to bait me.

Anyway, um what was I gonna say?

No, it's a little frustrating because I've been writing tweets to signal very strongly to this community that I don't want you guys joining in on the anti-immigrant waves of bullshit that you're seeing on X and social media and TikTok now because frankly it's a form of racial cannibalism.

And forget the moral stuff too.

Strategically it's a dead end and we want nothing to do with it.

But I also took time to explain how in a communist if communists seize power, none of this would be a problem.

Everything would be so controlled and regulated, there would be no misunderstandings, you know, ethnic tensions would be reduced to zero, you know, everything would be carefully managed, chaotic and uncontrolled mass migration wouldn't even be there in the first place.

Bilateral agreements would exist with the countries these people are coming from or fleeing from, that are on a developmental basis, so we can, you know, you know, like win-win Chinese paradigm style of international relations, right?

And when you make it about bilateral relations, suddenly it's not about, oh, what's our immigration policy?

Should we let everyone in the world in?

It's about what is our relation with other countries.

And migration would be controlled on a sovereign basis, you know?

It's the responsibility of a country to control the emigration, the people leaving, and it's the responsibility of a country to control who comes in.

And instead of this global mass migration,

You have deals and agreements and plans between sovereign countries.

So, none of that is to say that you end immigration completely.

None of that is to say that you don't let people in on an ethnic basis or something like that.

It just means that it has to be rational.

Because right now, it's irrational.

Because here's what goes on: the United States is responsible for underdeveloping and bombing so many different countries, and then refugees come, and it's just purely on an individual basis as well.

So, like, on the one hand, you have these underlying causes about why people have to flee their homelands, right?

And then, on the other hand, the consequences can't even be dealt with in a rational way.

So, those two things need to be addressed, right?

And that's what a Communist Party would do, obviously.

Um

You know, the the the the there's also the fact of, you know, there's an international labor market.

There's also the fact that people might want to come to the United States to study.

And learn and then go back to their countries and improve their countries, which is what happens a lot of the time as well.

There's also skills that we might want from other countries as well, right?

There's a lot of different reasons why immigration would be rational.

But there is no reason to think that, you know, i if a communist party took power in the United States, that we would just.

have no borders.

I mean what

You know, I need to get to the root cause of this because where is this Colin guy actually coming from?

And why did I dedicate so much to the whole weekend to this?

Not the whole weekend, but like all of the time that I allot

For, you know, work I spent on this.

So, why did I do that?

It's it's because the PSL has this very peculiar ideology uh that comes from a guy named Sam Marcy.

Now Sam Marcy was a Trotskyite and he helped found the Workers' World Party and the PSL was a split from the Workers' World Party, so this is what's going on here.

And the Marcyites were unique among Trotskyites in their more kind of unconditional support for actually existing socialist states.

Now, mind you, a lot of Trotskyites support

uh actually existing social estates.

they um they just call them deformed worker states or whatever.

But Marcy much more strongly emphasized kind of third world socialism, third world and it was just kind of part of this Trotskyite outlook where

Um, the Trotskyite class analysis was applied, so they thought, right, on the international stage.

So, if you want to know what the Trotskyite class analysis was, Trotsky believed that, Minister, what's up?

Trotsky believed that the primary force to lead revolution in terms of masses are like the most marginalized and the poorest and the most vulnerable population.

And that's basically to where it borders on kind of lumpen territory, basically.

The most dependent and vulnerable parts of society as the vehicle of revolution.

And the dynamic that Trotskyism creates is you have, on the one hand, a very kind of conceited bourgeois intellectual class, and then on the other hand, you just have like the most vulnerable.

most oppressed sections of society.

Now, Marxism-Leninism differs from that in a multitude of ways.

Marxism-Leninism begins with the leadership of definitely a leadership of a strong kind of intellectual strata.

But what the intellectual strata within the paradigm of Marxism-Leninism does is it creates working-class institutions that are a vehicle for training and educating people.

So instead of gatekeeping, you're kind of allowing even the lowest common denominator to have a path to rise through the ranks.

Another thing that's different about Marxism-Leninism is it contains a profound faith in the middle strata in ways that Trotskyism doesn't.

So for Lenin, this was his faithfulness to the middle strata of the peasants, the reliable middle strata, right?

The moderate peasants, basically.

That's kind of also the base of Stalin.

And then during the years of the Popular Front, the view wa became orthodoxy that, you know, we we need to rally the middle classes.

We need to rally the small petty bourgeoisie as well.

And the proletariat should assume the leadership, of course,

But there needs to be a deal that's made.

A kind of you need to work with the middle strata.

You need to work with uh

You need to work with those sections of society that are not necessarily going to be completely dependent on you, but which represent a more kind of authentic and organic orientation of society in general.

So for Lenin, you know, the middle strata of the peasants had a degree of independence because there was a democratic petty bourgeoisie that was among them.

And they had democratic aspirations.

And Lenin was coming and saying, we need to tap into that base and, you know, start a dialogue with them.

That's going to be the vehicle of the revolution in Russia, is an alliance between the proletariat and the middle strata of the peasants.

Now, Trotsky hated this.

Trotsky hated this idea of an alliance between the proletariat and the peasantry.

Trotsky believed that you should just only have the most even in terms of his understanding of class politics, of proletarian class politics, he believed that only the most vulnerable, most dependent sections of society should be brought to the fore, you know, in terms of the base that you're going to rely on.

And what's so conniving and manipulative about that is that

You're not leaving any room for proving the correctness or the truthfulness of the conceits of the intellectuals because these vulnerable people are just going to follow whatever you say and whatever you do because they're desperate, not necessarily because, in their own way and on their own terms, they've arrived at its essential truth, just in a different form, obviously.

And it's pretty stark.

For example, in the 1930s, and you're going to see this on X a lot, Trotsky himself said that the base of fascism wasn't actually the ruling imperialist bourgeoisie, but it was actually the petty bourgeoisie and the middle class.

So, this idea that the petty bourgeoisie is fascist and it's, you know, the fascism comes from the middle class, that is actually something that comes from Trotsky.

That was Trotsky's analysis.

Trotsky hated the masses.

He hated the masses.

He hated the people.

He was just, all he wanted was a dictatorship of antisocial bourgeois intellectuals and extremely desperate people who are the lowest section of society, who are going to follow whatever the leader says because they're desperate and they don't have time to really think about it in their own way, right?

So that is kind of the proto-fascism inherent in Trotskyism.

Because fascism does the same thing, but explicitly for the lumpen, right?

It's this kind of degenerate bourgeoisie mobilizing the lumpin, and that's the kind of relationship entailed by fascism.

Now why am I talking about Trotsky in relation to this Colin guy in the PSL and and Sam Marcy?

Because Sam Marcy did something that was rather interesting.

He applied Trotskyism to world systems theory.

where it was all about the global south, it was all about the third world, it was all about you know this lowest kind of most oppressed nations in the entire world as the vehicle for the victory of international socialism.

Whereas the Marxist-Leninist view was what?

It was the second world, not the third world necessarily.

Now, Mao has his own notion of three worlds theory, but the peculiar thing about that is that Mao obviously doesn't really just regard China as part of a global south.

Mao understands China has a premier significance as far as the leadership of the revolutionary masses throughout the world.

And so there's this kind of groundedness as far as Mao is concerned in a specific civilizational and national project, which was China.

But the the um

Later, that evolves into that becomes interpreted as like a Maoist third worldism, right?

And that kind of intersects with the Sam Marcy Trotskyism, which is a kind of vulgar, I don't know what to call it, third worldism, where Trotskyists are skeptical of nationalism, but if it's just the most oppressed nations that are patriotic and nationalistic, that's okay.

You know, we can forgive them because.

they will help facilitate the actual destruction of all patriotism in general, um because theirs is only uh based on you know the the extent of their inequality with oppressor nations.

So if you remove that oppression, that we we have we get the Trotskyite global revolution, basically.

So that is Sam Marcy more or less.

It's Trotskyism as applied to world systems theory, which a lot of people find it easy.

My reason is they confuse it for Marxism-Leninism because Sam Marcy included within that kind of non-aligned global south, if you will, a lot of actually existing socialist states.

Including China, I think, at the time, right?

But then after Deng Xiaoping, no, no, no, you know.

Now China enters the second world and the the Trotskyite Sam Marcy people are not fond of it.

But in any case, that is where they're coming from.

But that's not Marxism-Leninism.

It's Trotskyism as applied to world systems theory.

Now, I'll say something that I think is a little bit controversial.

I think Marxism-Leninism as applied to world systems theory is a lot closer to something like Eurasianism.

And by Eurasianism, I just mean this project for.

For uh

for cultivating and developing alternative strongholds of an alternative global system.

Rather than principally just focussing on the disadvantaged status of like third world countries or global south countries, a strong emphasis is p placed on an alternative global system, an alternative developmental paradigm.

So that is like China, that's also Russia on the political front, right?

And there's a big difference.

Russia's a big, big, strong country.

Carlito, what's up?

Russia is not, you know, a global South country.

And yet, Russia is at the fore of anti-imperialism on the political level globally.

Right, so that's kind of the Marxist-Leninist perspective in contrast to the Trotskyite perspective.

That's not to say Marxist-Leninists have anything against global South countries, especially ones that are fighting for their emancipation and liberation.

But they don't have this condescending and belittling attitude, according to which, oh, yeah, you Venezuelans are just patriotic because of how oppressed you are.

And we forgive you for it.

You're just too stupid to be as advanced as us Trotskyites.

Hopefully, you can enter the ranks.

Of us cosmopolitan Trotskyites and, you know, it's very like patronizing.

Whereas take the one country, Venezuela.

Like, Marcyites will support Venezuela and will support Venezuela, but the content of the support is totally different.

The Marciites will be like, oh yeah, Venezuela, all of that Bolivarian stuff, that's just because you're too stupid and you're too oppressed and you're not like us.

One day you'll be as cosmopolitan as we are, but you're not just because you're oppressed.

Now, our view is totally different.

Our view actually takes Bolivarianism seriously, that this is a poll in South America, that this is a legitimate paradigm of human development.

This is a legitimate paradigm of politics and geopolitics.

And this is a real civilization that the Venezuelans are leading the construction of.

This is something that could, in principle, rival Western society and civilization and that paradigm or whatever.

Like rival it in terms of the military power and economic.

I mean, obviously, Venezuela is a very poor country, and it's not in the foreseeable future going to be stronger than the United States.

But we believe Venezuela has the ability to challenge the United States in a fundamental way.

Just like we believe the same for Iran or Russia, and the case of China speaks for itself.

It's also true with Vietnam.

We're not against Vietnam.

We're not against Cuba.

We just don't have this condescending attitude to them, according to which, you know, we're not going to respect, according to which, you know, like that we won't respect their actual we view them as equals, we don't view them as people under us.

Does that make sense?

Like, we don't view them, we don't patronize them and like say, oh, yeah, you guys are just doing that because like you're oppressed.

It's like, well, no, you're Vietnamese.

You're proud of Vietnam.

You're proud of your history.

Vietnam has a very long history and you want to fight for Vietnam.

You don't, you're not just fighting inequality.

You're fighting for Vietnam.

That's our view.

You're not just fighting against inequality.

You're fighting for Venezuela.

And it's both, obviously, we get that, but it's like, there's also a positive content of these projects that we are very much interested and invested and we respect as equals, you know?

We respect them as equals.

We don't see them as below us or somehow uh because of circumstance they have to be dumber or less advanced than we are.

Um so that is kind of the difference.

So, like, Colin, he's a really stupid, stupid guy.

Again, I haven't, it's not really a personal thing.

I don't know who he is personally, but he's extremely illiterate in the sense that he's exposed to the PSL's views on these things, and the PSL calls itself Marxist and Leninist.

So, for whatever bizarre reason, Colin jumped the gun and decided that, oh, this is Marxism-Leninism.

This is what Marxist-Leninists actually believe.

This is what actual, this is, this reflects the outlook of actual Marxist-Leninist communists in history.

Like, this reflects what Stalin thought and what communist statesmen believed.

This is actually Marxism-Leninism.

It's like he just got the words confused, though, because he didn't see the and so he just like was very presumptuous and assumed that the PSL's notion of Marxism and Leninism was Marxist-Leninist orthodoxy, while he was totally alien to the Marxist-Leninist view, the actual Marxist-Leninist view.

He was so, and I quoted Dmitrov to him.

I showed so Dmitrov was the general secretary of the Comintern in the 1930s, and he is cited in

Marxist-Leninist textbooks is like that's a classic of Marxism-Leninism, what he wrote about fascism, right?

So, this is a kind of canonical orthodox Marxist-Leninist thinker, Dmitrov, especially in the context of the Popular Front and the anti-fascist struggle.

And at first, he couldn't believe his eyes.

Okay, at first, he was really trying to twist what Dimitrov very plainly said, which is that communists cannot be indifferent to history.

You need to have historical continuity.

You need to be the premier patriots of your country.

You need to be at the fore of the national patriotic struggle.

He wasn't just talking about oppressed nations either, because he listed examples of oppressor nations as well.

And he said, Communists, you can't let fascists steal patriotism.

You have to be the patriots.

That's a direct quote from Stalin: You must be the patriots of your country.

That's what Stalin said in his last speech, by the way.

But this is the standard Marxist-Leninist outlook.

It's the standard Marxist-Leninist again, Marxist-Leninist, not Marxist and Leninist, Marxist-Leninist outlook, right?

And I showed that to him.

And then finally, he's like, oh, yeah, but who cares what Dmitrov said?

He's like, who cares about Dimitrov?

That doesn't prove anything.

And I'm like, but this is about Marxism-Leninism.

Because Colin was trying to say that I was, this is just Dugan, and this is Duganism.

And like, he's the real Marxist-Leninist, and I don't know anything about Marxism-Leninism.

And Colin does.

And then finally, he's like, oh, yeah, Dimitrov, that guy doesn't even matter.

Who cares what he said?

He's like, who cares about Dimitrov?

It's like he's like, you're such a wise professor, dude.

Yeah, let's brush off Dimitrov, the fucking general secretary of the Comintern in the 1930s.

Like, yeah, let's just discard.

Yeah, the total, yeah.

I mean, yeah, just because he said it doesn't mean it's true.

Come on.

It's like this guy's like waffling and floundering.

He doesn't even know how stupid he sounds, right?

He's like, well, I'll pick and choose what I want.

It's like, okay, dude, but you're not a Marxist-Leninist.

Marxist-Leninists don't have a choice.

We can't just pick and choose.

This is canonic.

It's not dogmatism because this was reflected in practice.

These aren't just ideas, mind you.

These are not just ideas.

These are literal, practical, historical experiences that have been absorbed by the method of Marxism-Leninism.

So we cannot brush them aside.

We have to understand that this reflects experience.

And he's just like this professor who's like, well, you know what?

The syllogism that it's in my head, according to my syllogism, Dimitrov doesn't really, my syllogism in my head, I have so many thoughts in my head.

It's like, dude, nobody cares about your thoughts.

This is actual, like literal practical wisdom we're talking about from actual historical experience.

You know?

It's like it's infuriating the degree of his stupidity and ignorance when coupled with his arrogance.

He kept saying like, Oh, Haas doesn't know anything about Marxism, um, you know,

And and then he does

And he didn't even know what the Marxist Leninist view on these things was.

So he goes on to say a lot of just to the point where I'm like, all right, the debate's over.

Like, this honestly speaks for itself.

I don't know how you can crawl your way out of this hole you dug for yourself.

I don't know how you're going to do that.

Good luck.

I'm not very.

I'm not holding my breath as far as your ability to do this.

Because then he goes.

Get this, this is fucking crazy, right?

He's like, actually, nations aren't real.

He's like, nations don't materially exist.

I'm like, dude.

Have you read Stalin's Marxism and the National Question?

He goes, Yeah.

Let me control F that and Google it.

He hadn't read it, right?

He goes.

He goes, um, Stalin lists a bunch of factors and he includes psychological factors, which means it's not material, it's ideal.

And I'm like, huh?

Psych psychological factors are not material?

Do do you think s do you think like psychology is like a some kind of place that Marxists decide to concede to idealism?

You don't think psychology is m is material?

Has a material basis and is material?

He's like, uh um borders borders are fake because they're just in they're just by force.

It's fake.

Um but Stalin writes like w what common territory means.

It's defined by an extent of actual production.

You know, I was waiting for him to make the argument, like, oh, but production is global, so the b all borders are fake.

And it's like, well, no, because production doesn't just include, you know, trade, the extent of trade, it includes the control of trade.

It controls concerns different currencies and different markets, right?

Different levels of production.

You know, they're not even.

It's not globally even.

Anyway, um, yeah, he started espousing a weird form of metaphysical dualism where he's like, actually, um, nations are both material and ideal.

And it's like, but materialism says everything is material.

It doesn't say like some things are, it doesn't like concede some things to idealism and say, oh, yeah, materialism is only true to a limited extent.

It's like, well, no, materialism is fully true.

Everything is material.

If something is immaterial, it doesn't exist.

It cannot even be spoken of as an actual thing.

Right?

Well I read the whole thing to you guys right now.

Um no.

Anyway, uh

You know, anyway, let me continue because this guy said some really outrageous stuff.

I don't know if you guys actually fucking read it.

But it's like, it's pretty bad.

He goes, I shit you.

Let me, let me just.

Yeah I I I let me just read it to you because

If it's gonna, it's much worse how he wrote it than anything I could recall off the top of my head.

It's super bad.

It's super bad what he says.

He goes.

Get this, get this, let me find it.

No, you find it.

He goes, uh

He goes.

Um

Dugan makes a hard commit he's gibbering about Dugan.

He doesn't know that he's arguing about Marxism, Leninism, and Stalin.

He commits to cultural assembly.

He goes, as if there weren't differences between individuals.

You know, there's not just differences between cultures and histories and societies, Haas.

There's also differences between individuals.

Then he goes, Get this, this is fucking crazy.

He goes,

As if people didn't have a choice when it comes to identifying with their historically constituted community.

We should treat individuals as individuals, some of whom might identify as members of a historically constituted community, which is their choice, or bring various elements of their shared collective knowledge and experience with them, and others might reject such cultural identities.

Alright, let me s let me show you where it gets really bad though.

I don't Let me show you where he gets really bad though.

This is because all humans are free to create a historical narrative for themselves, to identify with whatever historical tradition or community they want, even if those communities do not accept them.

He's literally it's trans like it's like transracialism.

I'm like, what?

Ha ha ha.

He's literally saying he can be African even if Africans don't accept him as one of their own.

He's like, not only can I choose to be African, even if they don't accept me and I don't like assimilate into their societies, I am the same thing as an African.

Like, I'm a Senegalese man.

Even if Senegalese people want nothing to do with me, if I identify with Senegal, I'm Senegalese.

What did you guys read that?

I hope you read it.

I hope you were like, we're keeping track of this shit.

I hope I wasn't the only fucking one who had to like read this because it's like he's actually talking about like Judith Butler gender theory.

Like, we can just choose whatever gender we want.

It's all performance.

And he's saying the same thing is true about historically constituted peoples.

Look, you can believe what you want, man, but we're not in Marxism-Leninism.

We're not in Kansas anymore.

We're definitely not in Kansas anymore.

We're definitely not anything close to what Stalin would ever permit as even conceivable.

As far as his understanding of the national question, this is not Marxism-Leninism.

This is something else that's coming from universities and academia.

It's got nothing to do.

And it's like, look, I almost feel bad for this guy.

I know he's going through a rough patch in his life.

But the arrogance, it's like he's acting like he's such, like, he's so superior.

And, like, you know, he tried to be like, he tried to be like, Haas only has Wikipedia knowledge, and it's like, dude.

I don't even know what to say.

I just want at least one other person to bear witness to this, and I'll die at peace.

Because this is actual insanity.

He's like.

He's like, yeah, I can go to an indigenous tribe and tell them that I am their tribe, not only without having any indigenous blood, but even with the added fact of them rejecting me entirely, I could still identify with it.

He goes, we should treat individuals as free snowflakes who can do whatever they want.

It's like, dude, that is not Marxism-Leninism.

That is not, we're not talking about.

I don't.

He's making it seem like the only person Colin is making it seem like the only man who finds that contentious is Dugan.

He's like, he thinks the only theorist who would regard his view of transracialism with contention is Dugan.

As if historical Marxist-Leninists imagine, all right, listen.

Imagine you go up to Joseph Stalin.

He's smoking a pipe, whatever.

You go up to him.

Hi, Stalin.

Um.

I'm Chinese now.

He's like, are you like being?

Did you get Chinese citizenship or are you living?

No, no, no, they don't accept me, but I'm Chinese.

Did you know that?

According to Colin, Stalin would be like.

Yes, comrade, any individual is free to Yes, comrade, any individual is free to be whatever they want, like butterfly flying in the sky.

You can just identify whatever you want.

You want to be Chinese?

Okay.

You want to be African?

No problem.

This is what true liberation means.

True liber this is what I am a harsh dictator uh because uh there are I have to keep in line people who don't want your version of liberation, Colin.

Just tell me anyone who doesn't see you as Chinese or use your Chinese pronouns, I will shoot them with a revolver in the back of the neck myself.

Like that's that's what he thinks of uh that's what he thinks of Marxism-Leninism.

Like that's how he thinks about it in his head.

In his head, like Stalin was enforcing this liberation, right?

Anyway, um

I don't think this is why I'm like, you know

I don't need to do this forever with Colin Bodale, okay?

It's literally the same thing as what Lenin wrote.

He's like, okay, why should we reply to Kotsky?

Because then we're going to have to, because he's going to reply to our reply, and we would have to reply to his reply, and there'll be no end of it.

He goes, it just suffices to say that Kotsky's an enemy of the international proletariat and leave it there.

Now, what's the wisdom in that?

The wisdom in that is not anti-intellectualism.

It's not a refusal to engage, because Lenin did engage him.

But at the end of the day, I'm the executive chairman of the American Communist Party.

We have an actual Communist Party doing work on the ground.

We have a lot of things planned.

We have a lot of things planned as far as what we want to do.

We have a lot of ambitions.

We're already in the stage of a type of praxis.

And we're here and we're doing it.

And that's not going to be litigated at the level of some fucking professor sitting on his fucking ass, bitching and screaming and crying.

You know, the only thing I would entertain is somebody who wants to challenge our Marxist-Leninist credentials because that's all we had to go off of beginning with.

And that's why I partook in this debate in text form in particular, because, well, yeah, Marxism-Leninism is law to us.

So that does matter.

But like our grasp of Marxism-Leninism, I think it speaks for itself, especially in comparison to a guy like this.

So we're just going to go on with the work we need to do.

We're not going to sit here.

I'm not going to sit here and write hundreds of thousands of words for one guy for the rest of my fucking life.

Because I just kind of feels a little weird at this point.

I mean, this guy is really lonely right now.

I think he really wants to be my friend and wants me to like be his friend forever and like always have him in my thoughts forever.

And I'm just a little creeped out by it and I'd I'd much prefer to just

Let everything speak for itself and focus on things that matter.

'Cause, like, at the end of the day, look.

He

was so desperate to look for a way out after getting so destroyed that he's like, I'm starting a new series.

I'm gonna debunk Haas's Marxism is not woke thing.

Now it's funny for a few reasons.

One,

That wasn't a polemic.

That was an experimental, you know text project where I was like, I want to have the discipline to fit this into to fit inside tweets, right?

No more than two hundred and eighty characters for every part of it, right?

Second, the goal was to combat far right propaganda about Marxism.

Wasn't even about attacking leftists.

Your leftists are dead.

You're fucking dead.

That's why you're fucking biting our ankles instead of doing whatever.

Look, even the PSL, we don't talk shit about the PSL.

We don't say anything about them.

But I'm going to do that now.

Now that I know who's behind these attacks, the PSL literally started copying our trash pickup.

You know how everyone like mocks us for the trash pickup stuff?

Even though, by the way, plenty of our chapters are starting to do other stuff as well, as you'll see tomorrow.

But the PSL literally started doing the trash pickup stuff to copy us.

And they're getting super desperate because they could see our organization is growing rapidly.

We're even making a dent in New York.

We're making waves in New York, which is their turf.

And they're super, super fucking worried about it, right?

But

They have no faith in their own at the end of the day.

Here's my mentality: it's like, look, if you're a Trotskyite, I'm actually not here to criticize you or wreck you.

I want the results of your praxis to speak for itself.

And that is what I expect from leftists.

That's what I expect of them.

It's not what you get from them, obviously, but it's what I expect from them.

It's like, look, let's say you're right about us and we're all wrong and we're all stupid.

It's like.

What are you afraid of?

What are we hijacking or co-opting?

The PSL had its chance.

It really did have a chance.

The whole protest dynamic thing is just like hasn't been working that well.

It's gotten old.

Sorry, 2020 is over.

The CPUSA, I mean, we're gonna cut into your precious canvassing for Democrats shit.

Like, what?

Why why can't you just like let it fail if it's gonna fail?

EJ, what's up?

You know, like my idea is like, alright, like, look, take those um Trotsky's.

What are they called?

What are they called?

The uh.

What are the the R C A or whatever.

It's like look.

I could sit here and write 40,000 words debunking your theory.

But you know what I could also do?

I could write nothing at all and just let what you're doing and how that's

I could let your practice speak for itself, to be honest.

You know, just.

Like.

Are you doing anything new that's yielding any new results?

Are you innovating in any kind of way?

Are you are you doing anything that's working?

Well, here's the thing, like we've cracked some kind of code and we are doing things that EJ Holy shit, man.

Thank you.

Do not mean to underplay that.

By the way, people like to call me a fucking grifter.

If I was a grifter and I'm in this for money,

I wouldn't be broke.

Second of all, I would just stream every day.

I spend

All 20,000 words I wrote over the course of a few days, which is not even like huge for me.

Like, I could write 40,000 words in a day.

I'm capable of that.

If I just don't do anything, if I don't go to the gym or anything, I could do that.

But.

I didn't get paid for that.

I didn't get paid for any of it.

I got literally no money.

I'm not getting paid.

Clearly I believe in this shit.

I mean, why do you think I'm fucking doing this for money?

I don't make money.

I don't make money.

A lot of it at least.

I don't make a lot of money.

It's literally just my community that donates to me.

That's it.

No advertisers, nothing, no sponsors, literally nothing.

It's really something I'd like to

strongly emphasize, all right?

I want to tell you guys something, it's just us.

That's why I decided to Ottoman slap Colin's bitch ass back into the ground because I'm slapping PSL in the ground.

It's just us.

We are not taking money from foreign governments.

No one is helping us.

No one is it's just us.

We're not like being propped up by someone, it's just us guys.

I don't have Roy Singham's money.

I don't have anything like it's just us.

And we're taking on the PSL and all these fucking people.

And you need to understand that it's just us.

Strella Stani, what's up?

Um, it's just us, okay?

It's really just us.

And

You should appreciate that fact when it comes to me.

Ian Rose, what's up?

You should appreciate that fact.

Cause I'm doing this for us.

I'm doing this for this thing we've built.

You know, I saw that Colin is trying to treat himself like a victim now.

He's like, I'm, everyone's doxing me, and all these.

It's like, first of all,

We have nothing to do with that, all right?

Or no one I know has anything to do with it.

Um

And I haven't even seen that.

That's why I'm like, is he just lying and making it?

Because I haven't seen that.

But

He's like trying to like posture now and he's like, Yeah.

He's like trying to quote Mao and be like, To be attacked by the enemy is a good thing And like meanwhile Mao is talking about like the Japanese imperialists like the imperialist backed nationalists

And what is he talking about?

He's talking about like an extremely

marginalized communist party and movement in America, which is under attack from all sides twenty four seven, which is literally d hanging on by a thread, fighting the far right every day

And their propaganda every day and you want to be you're trying to make it seem like you're Jesus Christ and we're the Roman Empire.

Grow the fuck up you abject pussy.

You abject honorless pussy.

We are the fucking ones du engaging in all of the risk.

You're trying to make it seem like we're like the Persian Empire or something, dude.

Who are you even attacking?

You're t CNN is running hit piece.

Not only is CNN running hit pieces on us, he blames us.

He goes, If CNN is running hit pieces on you, that means you're a Fed.

That means you're the controlled opposition.

Hassan Piker gets featured in that same piece favorably.

What does that make Hassan you think it's like s reverse psychology where CNN is actually trying to make Hassan Piker look bad by like making him seem like this great guy and us are

And then, second of all, why did it take them

Why did it take Jackson getting 2.7 million followers for CNN?

To take note of his existence.

Why are they still embargoing any coverage of the American Communist Party to this day?

Oh, because you're not relevant enough.

So if they're not covering us, it's because we're not relevant enough.

But if they're literally forced to cover us because we've just become so unignorable, that means we're controlled opposition, right?

And then meanwhile

This idea that Jackson's popularity isn't organic is also something really hilarious.

Because in Afghanistan, in almost every country in the world, people are making fake Jackson Hinkle accounts to promote all these different agendas because they just know how popular he is among masses of people in these countries.

I've witnessed it with my own two fucking eyes.

Jackson going to foreign airports, everyone wanting to come take a picture with him.

They all recognize him.

They all love him.

Can I, I don't even know if I could say this shit.

All right, whatever.

FSB, if I can't say this shit, literally shoot me.

All right, when we go to the hotel in Russia.

You wanna know what happens?

Um well I didn't personally witness this, but he told me about it.

I don't know why I should tell you guys this.

Yeah.

He walks in, he'll walk in, all right?

He'll go to the concierge.

Hello, Mr.

Jackson Hinkle.

What?

They know him everywhere he goes.

They know who he is.

Not only do they know who he is, but they know what he's there for and he knows they know, you know.

And I'm like holy shit.

Holy shit.

Um

No, Jackson, his popularity is very real.

All right, it's very, very real.

I've seen it.

All right, it's not fake.

It seems fake because he's not popular among young trendy college students in America.

So he's not popular in your circles, but he is popular in the world.

I could tell you that.

He is popular in the world.

Um, and I'm in the shadows.

I have to be in the shadows, I have to be in the shadows because I'm doing the theory, okay?

I'm doing the theory.

Should I even give it away?

Nah, never mind.

Never mind.

See, the beautiful thing about this whole operation we're running is that everyone will speculate that like, oh, this is the Russians or it's the Chinese or it's the FBI or it's the CIA or it's this or it's that and it's like you're just too arrogant to see

Where the dream is coming from.

You're too you don't believe it.

It's too you're too arrogant.

It's too hard for you to believe where the dream comes from.

It's just too unfathomable.

What?

This fucking clown, Haas?

Is fucking clown?

And it's like that's right where you we that's right where we want you.

It's right where we want you.

That is right where we want you.

And I'm only telling you this because it'll never make a difference.

And

It won't change anything because they're too arrogant.

They're too arrogant to actually understand how it works.

They're like, but this Haz guy has no followers.

He's a nobody.

Nobody knows who he is.

And it's like.

Yeah, I'm a nobody.

And you know you know another nobody?

You wanna know another nobody?

Another nobody is Kyle.

Kyle's another nobody, you know?

He's just a nobody.

Who's Kyle, right?

Who's Kyle?

He's in who's who's who's ever gonna Kyle who?

And it's like, yeah.

That's how it works, bitch.

You don't, you don't, you don't, you don't know how it works.

You know what I mean?

This ain't this ain't

This ain't uh we ain't we're not actors.

We're here to get shit done and we're getting it done, right?

And we're getting it dot.

And we're getting it done.

But

We're getting it done.

That's what matters.

The work is being done.

Like, we're yielding results, and that's why the PSL is trying to fuck with us because they're not getting anything done, and we are.

And if we're not getting anything done, then fuck off!

Literally stop biting our fucking ankles and fuck off, literally.

Like, just fuck off then.

What do you even want from us?

I feel like these people are like, what do you want?

Like, what do you want, dude?

Literally what?

It's so strange and bizarre.

It's like there's such.

They're such like um ankle biters, such fucking losers.

Like, what do you even what's your goal here?

Like, just what do you want?

You wanna confront us?

Confront us.

We're here.

I'm right here.

I'm literally right here.

We're not hiding anything.

We're not high.

They're like, you're all feds.

You're all I write 20,000 words to some fucking tweets.

To tweets.

I write twenty thousand words.

Anyway, oh, it's so mysterious.

What's driving these people?

What are their motivations?

Yeah, it's almost like we it's almost like we've outlined our positions and polemicized about them extensively and it's all publicly accessible.

Yeah, it's almost like we are just like

It's almost like everything is literally on the surface.

And it's no like it's no oh it's no crazy secret.

In any case, you know

Is this uh debate guy gonna come, by the way, or?

No, he's not coming.

Alright, that's fine.

Oh, I was gonna say, uh, p what was I gonna say?

Yeah, anyway, Colin wanted to write this new series to pivot because he's just like he's just like throwing stones and running away.

He's like, Yeah, you know, I'll get Haas by like I'll save face by starting to shit.

Keep he's shitting and farting all over the place.

JB Wolfe, and he's like, It's like Colin will fart in a direction.

I'd be like, dude, that smells really bad.

And then to save himself from the embarrassment, he'll go and like fart in another direction as if it's not still stinking up the room.

And it's the same problem.

But, you know, I got into my predator mindset and I'm like, all right, this thing he wrote is paywalled.

So he paywalled it, by the way.

He paywalled it and said it was his for his own protection that he's going to paywall it.

Because I think he can detect I'm a psychopath who's going to demolish it in like 35 minutes.

Anyway, I didn't have to do that.

That was just something I felt like doing.

I didn't have to.

I don't.

I won.

The debate's over.

I won.

So going forward, you know.

If my predator instinct kicks in

I'll try to tame it and I'll be like, I have work to do as chairman of the party.

But but if he does raise anything that I'm like, okay, I need to respond to this to clarify things, you know, people are, you know, people are asking me questions about it, then yeah, I will.

Ah, it just depends on my mood honestly at this point.

It th and now now he's working on my time basically.

But in any case, there was a preview of his substack that was accessible and it was like, I don't know, like f f two hundred fifty or five hundred words.

It's like 500 words or something, I don't know.

Where he's like critiquing me.

And I like just destroyed it with like 4,000 words.

I wrote like this morning, I wrote like 4,000 words just like destroying and dismantling.

Like so meticulously, nuking his preview.

If one of you keeps getting bankrolled, you must be aware of that.

Dark Money, what's up?

Absolutely.

I love the Sonic song.

See, I hate the save Europa.

Shit, because it's so like anti-human and whatever, but the fucking playlist.

Bangers after bangers.

I'm surprised our enemies haven't seized on that connection.

So.

Um yeah, so anyway, I nuked his preview.

And um

It was such meticulous detail how much I'm dismantling and destroying it.

It's like I even feel bad for him.

No, no, no.

F fuck fuck Erica, the f German stupid World War II bullshit.

I'm not talking about that, alright?

So, when infrared started, my music taste.

Alright, I'll tell you my music taste.

My music taste is really all over the place.

I like melody.

I like beautiful, melodic sounding music.

Melody.

I love melody.

I like music that's melodic and pleasant and beautiful.

And, you know, I like it.

I like music that is nice.

I don't like the music that's like, I don't like that.

I like nice sounding music.

And I don't like, I prefer women to sing to me and not men.

Because you know, when I, when I, um, whenever it's like those women like Blum Chen or whatever, saying, No, no, no, no, no, it's like in the way I think of it, it's like this is Cortana in my head, and I'm Master Chief, and I'm at the gym, and I'm Master Chief, and that's Cortana.

Anyway, it's like Object A with uh Lacan, right?

Anyway, um.

So I like pleasant music, but then on the reverse side, I like hip-hop.

I like hard.

I like hip-hop that goes hard and is violent sounding and with drums.

And I like, there's two types of music I like, right?

I like music that's like tribal drums, going to war type shit, going hard type shit, rob a grocery store type shit, pour gasoline on your enemies and light them on fire type shit.

Arabic music, hip-hop music, I like that drums.

I like the heavy bass and the drums.

And I like the shit that goes hard and it's just like meticulous, nefarious, and villainous in that sense.

DMX is nice too.

So I like that, but I also like.

I also like um the pleasant angelic kind of sounding music, right?

Anyway, so when I started infrared, you could see the music I like.

I like the combination of the like extremely

I don't know what I'd call it, like very techno.

I don't know if I'd call it techno, like just like a lot of instruments, technology, whatever, like very fast-paced.

But there's like a melody where it's like, huh.

And like it's like pl it's like um so that's like Euro trash music basically.

It's like that's the European stuff.

That's what Europeans like.

And it's what I like, you know?

It's like the German, British.

Yeah, Euro stuff.

That's what I like.

All right.

I don't watch Eurovision, but like I like that kind of music.

I don't even know, I don't know the names because I just use Spotify.

I literally just use Spotify.

And I just, when I'm on Spotify, I'll add it to my playlist or I'll like it to save it.

And I won't even remember the name, but I'll be like, oh, yeah, that song.

Anyway, but it's like 90s, especially 2000s, Y2K, where it's like, it's like melodic, but also fast-paced and like aggressive in a sense.

Don't know what to call that.

It's called like.

Happy hardcore, I don't know.

Is that what it's called?

I don't I don't know the names of any of these genres.

Eurobeat, hard style, all that stuff.

So.

Euro dance, Europop.

Yeah, I like all that.

Running in the nineties type B.

Yeah, yeah.

So, I like that type of music.

Yeah, the Dota sounds.

I like that stuff.

Um.

And I why and I and I like it for ideological reasons actually.

Because to me it's like the uni it's like um

It's like the reconciliation of opposites.

It's like on the one hand, you have like the aggressive, alienating sounds and instruments, but on the other hand, you have a melody and you're combining, you know, you're combining the acceleration of the forces of production with the harmony and the melody of purpose and meaning.

So it's like, to me, it's like very Chinese, socialism with Chinese characteristics.

That's how I think of it, right?

That's how I think of it.

But I guess you could put a twist on it and be like, that's like European social welfare states or something.

I don't know.

But I like that kind of music because of that contrast, which I like.

But in any case, um, you know who else likes that music?

Our Neo-Nazis.

And that the only thing that I'm like, all right, take me to court because something is wrong here.

Because it was literally like an accident.

Because I didn't know that, right?

Because now, recently, all these bangers, like objective bangers, including the Sonic song, which is a banger, right?

It's like being used by the Save Europe crowd.

I don't think all the Save Europe people are not.

I think the people behind it are Nazis, but the people that are into it don't know about the actual ideological agenda.

It's kind of like a meme in that way.

But it's like

That music taste, like, I, I, I definitely, like, it resonates with me.

That music genre, whatever it's called.

Like, the Save Europe shit is the worst.

I fucking hate it.

But, like, the playlist, for some reason, the playlist is pretty good.

I'm not going to lie.

For some reason, the playlist is pretty good.

But they're kind of ruining it for me because I like to mix it in with hip-hop in between songs.

But when you just have back-to-back have that same shit, it's kind of kills it for me.

A lot of them go to a club and experience raves.

They call me Sonic.

And then, yeah, I hate the Oslander.

It's so cringe.

So, that song is super good.

What is that song from?

The song is from Uncut Gems, which is the Jewish movie.

That's what makes this so interesting.

So, Uncut Gems is a movie about metaphysical Judaism.

Pretty sure it is.

You know, some Ethiopian Jews find a stone and it represents randomness and chance and fate and all these kind of Jewish religious themes are in that film.

That is one of my favorite films of all time, by the way.

And that film literally, like, I something about that film.

is pain.

I just think about it it's like I'm I'm in so much pain.

'Cause it's so gr 'cause like I

I feel like I could be in that film.

Like all the desire that and it's like Julia Fox.

The fuck kind of Jewish magic were they doing?

Because like Julia Fox.

already, like, she's so fine in that film that I'm like

I was depressed for two weeks after watching it because I'm like, I'll never have anything like that.

Just the longing, right?

So that's that.

But then like the way that they like portrayed her was so like

Metaphysical.

It was like shit.

It's like she was like working at the jewelry store.

I was like, damn, that's like when you're in person and you go to a jewelry store and there's just like a baddie behind the counter and you're like, damn.

What the hell?

Another one that got away.

And it's like, wow.

That movie, Uncut Gems.

I'm not just a coomer, right?

Literally look at her, man.

All right?

Anyway, um

That was during lockdown, all right?

So cut me some slack.

That I watched it during lockdown in the fall of 2020.

But the movie itself is not just her, it's like also the money.

It's like, oh my god, there's like everything is going wrong, and it's like he's trying to make this money, and there's all these fucking moving parts, and like it just he finally does it, and it's like magic, and then he just gets shot.

And I'm like, that's so fucking relatable.

That is so relatable.

Like everything is going wrong.

It's all so random, and you just think there's a meaning behind it, and then you just get shocked.

And I'm like, fuck.

And then at the end, they played that song.

This is a good fucking movie, man.

This is a good fucking movie.

This is a really good movie.

And that's why I started liking that song because I'm like, damn, this movie's there's something so ice cold about it.

It's like it's in New York, it's so grimy, it's got Julia Fox, it's about money, like, and chance, and all this stuff.

And it's like, it was so, it was one of the realest movies I ever watched.

It's so real.

Like, that movie is so damn real.

It's such a real movie, man.

It's like the realest movie of all time.

Straight up.

Um

Anyway, um what was I gonna say?

Yeah, that movie, super good.

Well, how did we get to this movie?

Oh, yeah, the Save Europe people.

Anyway, then they started.

The Germans and Miriel, they started doing the Auslander Raus.

Twist, which they took from that movie.

I know someone took it from the movie, and I'm like.

It's super cringe because, like, these are a bunch of like fucking nerds in Germany.

They're a bunch of like awkward nerds.

And they're like, we could be cool too.

Auslander Raus.

Auslander Rauss.

And they're like,

That's their way to indulge in like a trend where they can feel like they're doing something cool and trendy.

But they're actually like the biggest fucking nerds of all time.

And I hate the fact that it's you know, Stigmaris.

You know what I hate about Groipers?

Like, they're the fucking nerds in school who wear a bow tie.

But then they feel like they're the cool kids.

Oh yeah, Peppy the Frog.

Yeah, Oslander Bouse.

Owsland.

It's like, shut the fuck up, you cringe fuck.

It's like just like, ugh.

No, the Ramstein song Ouslander is a pretty good song too.

But they're it's like a it's like a Europe thing where they're like immigrants out, that's what it means, or outsiders out, and they're doing it to that song and they're like, This is triggering the libs and it's like mm.

It's just fucking cringe.

But it's a good song.

Not the lyrics, but the song itself is pretty good.

Song itself is pretty good.

Anyway, um

Yeah, my mu if anything is it's not Dugan, it's not all this other shit, it's like my music taste.

What the hell is going on with that?

something really far right going on.

I don't understand it.

It's like I'll be on TikTok and be like, Oh, this is a banger And then like I'll look at what is happening and it's like some really grotesque, extremely vitriolic racial hatred shit and I'm like, Oh.

That's not quite what I was thinking.

Not quite what I was thinking.

But

I want us to talk about serious shit today.

Um, what was I gonna say?

I read something that mattered.

What was I gonna say?

Oh yeah, CNN.

I was gonna say that or okay, whatever, we'll just skip to that.

Um CNN uh delayed it and I don't know, I'll probably be in Russia whenever it comes out.

So we'll see.

We'll see what happens.

But I'll be in Moscow for quite a bit.

Why?

You'll see.

You'll see why.

I'm not gonna tell you exactly when, I'll just tell you it's soon.

But um are you allowed to stream there?

Yeah, why not?

There's a chance I might not go, all right?

There it sense I might not go yeah, they may not release it post-election.

Oh yeah, I was gonna say Trump.

Uh I don't know what happened with Trump.

I just put it in the info as clickbait.

That's all the the only reason I put it in the stream info is just for clickbait.

I didn't like I don't fucking know who killed Trump, what happened, who shot him.

Uh I don't know.

I don't fucking know.

Probably nothing, right?

Nothing happened.

He was a NAFO guy, all right?

He didn't shoot anyone.

It's huge.

Well

Whatever.

Uh I was gonna say another thing.

I was gonna talk about revolutionary fire.

and the traditionalism of revolution.

But I'm kind of not in the mood to.

Kinda not in the mood to, but it's like

When you think about it.

The only real thing is fire.

Yeah.

when you think about it.

There's a really scary side to me, you know?

Where, like, and you actually see it when I do inhuman feats, like fucking 40,000 words in a day, which I can do, by the way.

just pure just destruction through the text format, right?

Why does it take me so long to write my books and why does it take so long to write the manifesto?

Because I don't want to treat those things as like me

Dest it's not those are not acts of destruction.

Those are acts of creativity.

And they require me constantly stepping outside of my own frame of mind at a given time, thinking about the bigger picture and making sure that it sounds

you know, historical, that it that it's uh that the meaningfulness that I'm conveying, you know, is um of itself and not just emanating from my fury and my frenzied rage.

And

That's why I take my.

That's why I don't want that to be rushed.

But when it comes to shit like this, where it's like I'm, you know, there's something very mechanical about it.

Like, you're not going to believe this, but like, there's a certain frame of mind I can get into.

Like, whether it's writing or whether it's fucking war, all right?

I become fire straight up.

No mercy, nothing, just pure, pure destruction.

And it doesn't feel good, but it's like I don't know if, like, epigenetically.

My I have like a great grandfather or a gra or a family that's just like well, you know, I'll just tell you this.

My family tribe was one that fought everyone all the time.

And it was known for that.

It was known for just fighting and fighting and fighting, right?

And I kind of thought about it and I'm like, that's why, you know, there's like an epigenetic thing in me where it's just like, it comes so naturally to me to just like concentrate all of my existence to the destruction of other, of another person or of something.

Like going to war is like extremely easy to me.

Comes off very naturally to me, and it's like when I get in that fucking frame of mind, it's like very scary, you know.

Um

And most of the time, when I'm walking around and like in general, like I look like that.

I don't intend to, but I always try to think to myself.

That um Lotus, what's up?

Very true.

But I always try to think to myself and be like.

That's not what makes you

you know human

You need to destroy the enemy, but honestly, the decisive thing is that once you win.

you need to show mercy.

And I thought about that and I was like,

You know

Capitalist modernity was a fiery revolution.

That ended with

No mercy.

And so the fire

Kind of

started becoming more solid, if that makes sense, and it froze.

It just was extinguished and it was frozen.

Like that original revolution, the modern cap it was f it f it froze, right?

And it became this kind of unyielding and cruel form of torture.

That it held all of humanity to the standard of just this cruel, cruel, unyielding

Merciless

Freezing of revolutionary time.

And I like to think about how Lenin was fire.

You know, Lenin melted.

The citadels of world capitalist imperialism, but he melted capitalist modernity itself in a metaphysical sense.

Something that was frozen, Lenin made it molten again.

He made it living.

He made it he forced it to confront its own occluded, suppressed foundations.

You had this world of colonialism and imperialism, and Lenin said, I'm going to remind you.

Of your roots.

I'm gonna humble you.

I'm gonna show you what the engine of history actually is made of.

It's made of fire, it's made of molten, it's made of revolution.

You forgot that.

You became arrogant.

You became conceited.

You froze it.

You froze it in time and unyieldingly.

You tortured humanity over its inability to live up to that ideal.

of pure negation, pure nothingness, pure form.

And I thought the real moment of Leninism was not Lenin's lifetime, it was Stalin.

Because Stalin

represented revolutionary mercy.

The fire of Leninism

you know, toppled an empire.

But the revolution didn't spread.

And Stalin

On the basis of that frenzied revolutionary flame.

Red Dog, what's up?

Decided not to freeze it, but to, in a sense, cool down and just accept this fact.

In a very eloquent and

harmonious fashion, fire was allowed to become

You know, something solid, not frozen, mind you, but just solid, and that was allowed to be recognized.

Um, but the moment of mercy was when the positive content of that destruction that Lenin brought, because everyone says, Oh, Lenin is this destructive demon and all this kind of stuff, but that's not true.

Lenin is the one who just melted something that was very destructive and demonic, which is capitalist modernity.

And Lenin melts this, he melts it, he turns it into molten, you know, turns it into a smoldering lake of fire.

And he reminds the arrogant ruling class of how precarious its foundations truly are.

You know, Lenin is evoking the memory of Genghis Khan.

This is the stuff out of which the modern world is made.

This is the lost modernity you forgot about.

This is how it's built and this is how it's born.

You know?

The arrogance of the modern West, he stood, that's what he stood up to.

And that's why he was such a

violent revolutionary or whatever, because

By standing up to that, he was repeating its original sin.

But the difference was.

With Stalin, you know, the repetition of the original sin of capitalist modernity.

happens but

Then the decisive moment is mercy, you know.

Revolutionary mercy.

Like forgi modernity must forgive its own repressed foundations, forgive them, once it can forgive them.

Then it can free itself from this unyielding conceit, this torture.

Just forgive.

Forgive, you know?

This is what Stalin does.

He

He partakes in this kind of merciful forgiveness.

of

Of the Russian country, you know?

Like this is the foundation of the revolution.

Instead of

constantly and cruelly attacking the foundation for not living up in and in form being identical with the flame, he recognizes the harmonious interconnection between the two and he forgives the foundation.

That's what forgiveness means.

I thought about this in relation to my exchange with Colin.

Every time I was dismantling Colin

through the written form.

What it felt like is that he's racking up debts.

You know, like he's literally, I'm just here defending my honor.

And like

Just on that basis, I am unyieldingly ex exacting debts from him.

Like he's he's becoming indebted to me in this fundamental way.

You know, he's becoming indebted because he's got a lot to answer for and I and he's like he's getting slapped around and he's just saying all this stupid things and he's just his ignorance is being exposed.

And now he feels like he's in debt and he's gotta like he's gotta redeem himself and he's he's gotta like do something to show that no no no no no no I and it's like Colin

You know what kind of guy I am?

I fucking forgive you, man.

Like, really.

You didn't know, that's okay.

Like

Nobody knows everything.

Um automatically.

You know?

I don't want to torture you because you you're not

You don't know anything about Marxism, Marxism, Leninism.

I don't want to torture you over that.

But I forgive you for it.

I'm willing to show you mercy, you know?

Um it doesn't mean you're a completely irredeemable person and you have no potential to do anything.

But what you need to ditch is the arrogance.

That's the problem.

This really.

undue arrogance you have, you know, that's really the problem.

That's what I'm trying.

I'm not trying to kill you, dude.

All right, you're talking crazy.

Oh, they're trying to talk.

I'm trying to kill that arrogance you have.

I'm trying to humble you.

And I'm not trying to humble you because I want to humiliate you and turn you into my slave.

I want to humble you because.

I I want you to

I want you to be an honorable person.

I want you to actually be honest.

Just honestly confront the truth.

Yeah.

When you're speaking and you're saying and running your mouth saying all these different kinds of things.

I want you to be humbled, you know.

You're not a god.

You're not just because you're a profess it doesn't mean anything, you know?

Really doesn't.

And you know, mercy is so important.

You know, it's so important, man.

We all get into debt in some kind of way sometimes.

And it's like, so if we get into debt, should we be tortured or should we be forgiven?

And it's always about forgiveness, you know, because we're in debt.

We're in debt to the air we breathe, man.

We're in debt to the water we drink.

We're in debt

you know, to the alignment of the stars that makes this planet possible.

You know, we're in debt to the sun, we're in debt to the moon, we're fucking in debt to everything that stands before us.

and it shows us mercy.

by virtue of our existence.

You know, I'm really good at destroying people and taking people down.

But when I do it, I do I don't feel good about it afterwards.

I feel good about it while I'm doing it.

It's like, yeah, it's a righteous but then after I do it, I never feel good about it.

I'm just kind of like, well, what an ugly thing.

You know?

I kind of feel like uh.

Let me LARP a little.

I kinda feel like um

One of the Civil War generals, I forgot, where they're like, It's a great thing that war is so ugly, otherwise we'd become so fond of it.

And it's like whenever I destroy someone or take them down, that's kind of how I feel.

I'm like.

This is a really ugly thing, and if this is the meaning of life, it's kind of an ugly life.

It's kind of just an ugly world, an ugly universe we live in.

But then I think to myself and I'm like but that's not what it's about.

It's about how, in spite of all of that necessary ugliness and war and cruelty and whatever,

When you do become the creditor, when you are in the position of an advantage, that's when you show mercy, and that's when you're truly exercising power.

Yes, defeat the enemy and crush them and bring them to their knees, but once you do that, help them back up and show mercy.

That's what it means to be a leader, in my view.

You know?

Not proving your superiority.

But humbling da humbling these arrogant people.

So that your leadership can be based

on a fundamental sense of equality.

We we are all nothing, you know.

I I need to bring you down before I can help you back up.

So, you can lose your arrogance, and I'm not bringing you down because I'm better than you, I'm bringing you down.

Because

I recognize my fundamental

You know, indebtedness to the creator.

That's how I can bring you.

The reason I can bring you down.

Is because I've let go of ego and personal conceit and all this kind of stuff, and it's just like I'm an instrument.

of a greater mercy and a greater cruelty.

And that's how I bring you down.

Yeah.

Like, I'm not in the saying, like, oh, God talks to me or something.

I'm saying it in the sense of, like, this is what I feel like I'm doing.

I'm I'm like doing something that is faithful to what is true and absolute, you know, and honorable.

But ultimately, you know, true leadership is shown in mercy.

It's not shown in cruelty.

Although that cruelty might be necessary,

To humble the arrogant and the wicked.

That is not the decisive point of leadership.

The decisive point of leadership

See, the decisive point of leadership is not when the Bolsheviks are massacring all the counterrevolutionaries.

That's a decisive step in the in the necessary consolidation of power.

But leadership happens in 1936 when Stalin forgives the counter revolutionaries.

And says, you know what, you can vote now.

Leadership is exercised in forgiveness.

That's what I think, in mercy.

And more in particular, mercy.

Because when you show people mercy, the metaphysical significance of that is what you're doing is you're emulating something, you're emulating something that's true about.

Our existence at a fundamental level.

You're showing people and emulating the same mercy, you know, that permits life itself to emerge from non-life.

You know, you're the same mercy that allows humanity to emerge from the animal kingdom, the same mercy that.

by the beneficence of which we exist, you know, that same mercy is being emulated and expressed through leadership.

Because power, state power is also a terrible force of nature.

State power is also a terrible and wrathful thing.

The power of the collective humanity.

You know, it's a mighty, mighty force.

A blind, wrathful and mighty force.

That's the power of the state.

You know, or have a dynasty, if you don't want to use the word state.

That's the power.

of a state.

It's a wrathful, mighty, mighty, cruel and blind monster.

It's indifferent to individual life.

It's indifferent to the value of an individual, fundamentally indifferent.

It is blind justice, blind might of the combined existence of millions and millions of people and all of their collective power and all of their interrelations and all of their um you know and all of their social relations and all of their production and all uh the whole power of society concentrated into a single force.

But that force can be merciful with a merciful leader.

A merciful and forgiving, and that's what Stalin was: a merciful and forgiving leader.

That's what Mao was.

And that mercy is the truth.

That is how mankind comprehends the metaphysical, if you will, truth.

of all universal existence.

That is how we walk in the path of to be blasphemous, but the Orthodox people will be fine with this.

That's how you walk in the footsteps of the divine.

You know.

That's how you

That's how you have an upright state.

Anyway guys.

Speaking of Orthodoxy, I'll be in Moscow next time.

I ice cream.

Anyway.

That's all I wanted to say.