Political bloodsports

Stone faces don't I

Baby with your heart

Stone faces don't I faces to mind

and

I'm a Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The I'm I'm

I'm

I'm sorry.

I'm going to be so. So, So,

you're

mine, Some faces to mind.

Baby when you're in your heart

Forfeited to mind The I'm I'm Francis

Go I'm Oh, Stone faces don't lie. I Sto faces

Too much I made a sight I'm going to

I know

You would feel my

I say No, you would feel my face

You're tired, you never try to leave my side,

but all you ever told my life

I can face the demons on my own.

My mind lies better in the time.

Do you really want to fall off?

I feel like I'm falling in the universe.

You're never trying to leave us

like that

you ever told us

I can face the demons

on my up on

time

life that

you're in that

do you want to fall

up

I feel like I'm falling

in me

first

you never try to leave us right

But all you ever told us

I can face the demons on my own

Oh and I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm and uh...

uh...

uh Time Time

Time

Maybe

the other car

To be up the car

Follow to the other time Time. Farrowe to be a pop-up-a-time. For-a-up-a-bye.

To-bella-up-a-up-a-time.

Nice-be-be-be-be-ha-be-ha-ha-ha-ha. The other two of all the heart. The other, to be a bit of all the car. Now Now hush, little baby, don't you cry? Everything's gonna be alright.

Stiffin'all, pull it up, little lady, I told ya, Daddy's here to hold you through the night.

I know Mommy's not here right now,

and we don't know why.

We fear how we feel inside.

It may seem a little crazy, pretty baby,

but I promise,

Mom's gonna be alright

Now hush little baby don't you cry Everything's gonna be alright

Siff you never put in a pop little lady

I told ya, let me see to hold you through the night

I know mommy's not here right now and we don't know why.

We fear how we feel inside.

Maybe seem a little crazy, pretty baby,

but I promise, Mom, I'm going see a little crazy, baby, that I promise you know, it's gonna be alright.

Now, hush, little baby, don't you cry?

Everything's gonna be all right.

Stiffing let up her lip up, little lady, I told you,

Daddy's here to hold you through the night.

I know mommy's not here right now, and we don't know why.

We'll hear how we feel inside

It may seem a little crazy pretty baby you cry, everything's gonna be alright,

just you, love and nothing away

I told her

let me see the hold you for the night The The The The I'm not I'm I'm not

I'm not

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm not I'm not

I'm going to I'm You know, I I

I'm I'm

The door R'a

R'an

Muede

Kla Kahn

Have libe

for all

So many

Krisale

in glass and they BASN

FITZ

Cheise

on what you sit

G Golden Nelash, the head comes to my Sils Do you really shies

Ha ha ha Maha

Maha

Maha Mugue

Dichie for you

here is

Caput

Gila

Everyone

Bhop Everyone man Gives Gave

Fian

Fian

Garnah Garn

G G G Gives G G G Nooskazir, 90s Javi, four-a-three-a-Zisa, give me hyper, hyper, Give me a lot of,

Radar Tosche Fuller,

she said my own, she will,

your friend would frecky

Love and good-gruise,

I said, dance on me like a bina,

but the sunn't off, I'm still, and like a bina, but I'm gonna'uble,

and on the Mdremm, I make you know what I'm gonna.

I'm gonna dole.

I'm gonna'n of a thousand

I said my housewe

we're afraid for you

like for you.

Love,

I'm good,

I have bands on me, like a piano, and I'm I'm

I'm gonna

I'm gonna

and I'm

Mourke

Mour makes

Schuett She can

Mekyll

RANner

Metsch She can't My

Chappert Bess

Bisse

Chappert I'm

Hurt

Rengue Stendish

The Lest The Lent The Lack I know I'm not shepherds like heurter on English I'm stendish The last man in club Like a tour ward

Have a good

Airt's like a sport La beer here

In park

Overcdot

Borghats Warrh I'm

I'm

I've got

I've

Patsisame Have you

But I

I've I'm I I've But I've I've taught A pair Like a I'm I'm gonna

I'm gonna'

I'mal

And malet

That's make

Kanner

Mouser

Mose'

Sanger

Mose'an

Zaneanan

Borgue

N'A

Give me

more

Rostom

Rop

Rottott Suff She said my eyesweil. We're all right to

We're all right to We love

I'm I'm

I'm

Ones

I'm On the

I'm

I'm I'm I'm

And on I'm

Mach M makes feel And

And M

M makes feel We're doing a moment that's cool You're going to be like to be happy.

Yeah. Attention Attention The

VIII

M.

M.

M. The The The I'm I'm Our Our deal right. The vrack will be

a man. The You know, Oh, Oh Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh

Are you

Yes

I And it was Yes Are you ready? Yes I'm glad love

And it was against

Soon turned out

At a heart of west

Seemed like the real thing

Only if I

Would you mistrust

Love's gone behind

I was going behind I

I

I know How's that love? And he wants to find out Soon found out I was losing my mind

You seem like the real thing

But I was so blind

Watching me so just

Left's down behind

Inuit

I'm

In between what I find is pleasing

and I feel fine

love is so confusing

there's no peace of mind

If I fear I'm losing you

It's just no good.

You're teasing like you do.

Once I know, hey, once in a guess.

Soon turn up

At a heart of ass

Some like the real thing

won't even buy

Much of this judge

Let's call me on

Lost inside I Let's call me all.

Lost inside. A terrible illusion

and I care my hide.

I'm the one you're using

to stop pushing aside.

We could have made it cruising yet.

Yeah. We could have made a cruise. my mind. I'm the one you're using this. So push me aside.

We could have made it cruising yet.

Ooh.

Oh. Oh. Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh.

Oh. I'm I'm from

Horae They're not the shahle-koyash, you're in shmallai in dergain.

Ithaggna,

you're not going to smir,

you're going to be a new Thank you. I'm

a lot of I'm I'm

I'm

I'm The

Aftbathed a-up-ta-a-a-a-a-a-ooms-k-loss.

Hock- on not I'm

not not

not

I'm not not

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

all up I'm

I'm

all I'm not I and I was that's

I'm going to lie. and she's bad at new yule the young guy,

you know,

the time

that's about the day

and I'm

think in the

town man

and you're looking

a lot

and

a

young Cardo. Oh, I don't know. I'm going to be able to be the other, my than you know, my name I'm going to ask her

My thing is the other

I'm going to stand and who you're the other

I'm going to ask

I'm going to ask

I'm going to father

My thing is the mother yet'iott and guess you're the one who's gonna you're the one and I'm gonna you're so on the one I'm sure that I'm going to love you're the one. I'm going to ask you're the one.

And I'm just a matter

my opinion of the time.

I'm saying you're not saying

I'm going to love you best

and if yeah I'm Thank you. I'm I'm

I'm from

the

I'm I don't know heather, who are, who are,

who's

hummai?

The humatine

they're chelah

in I'm The I'm a lot of

I'm

I'm

a I put down to almost a lot of us.

I put down with the voice. I'm not the I'mma'uice

Havd'ruburned

back

come

I'm

GON shushnay

Gail GON't

GON't GON't

D'

D' D' D' D'u'll a'uagin'bott'n

D'rra'u' I'm Borgheim Bidding, Bostar cut out of my thing in the other,

I'm, you're having a good man,

who you let's hear of the young I do,

Bidtham.

Bidtham Barskardtradat,

I think about my thing,

I'm going to diem,

yet shies my own yulele, I'm going I'm sure I know you're

a thing and yeah

I will not

I'm I'm and you know

I'm

Buhra

Bhaven Thank you. I think you ask you guys I know

I know

I'm going to

never think of

I'm going to

love you but I'm

that I know I know I know I'm going to be able to have been I'm going to ask

I'm going to

dare

I'm going to

see that no you

that

I'm going

I'm going I know

that

have got there

and

may have never to see that no you I'm going to be able to lie. I think you're going to lie.

I'm sure.

You're the world.

I think I'm the other one.

And I'm going to ask you a

my thing and get a mother.

I'm going to die and see that and know you were

and I'm going I'm sure and know you and and get

I'm yeah I'm The Myrtle my name's Myrthalem,

my name's

my I'm time from my life I'm

Dukhanemdaherai

I'm daqan

I'm da'

Who

I'm I'm I'm going to know I'm going to

that it's a lot of

every

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm and the I don't know and

I'm

and

I'm A lot of

A

A A

A A A I'm I'm

I'm

I'm going to go.

I'm going to go.

I'm going to

I'm

I'm and

I'm

a lot

and

I'm a I'm GERGEL

I'm

I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm and I don't know

and

I'm I'm I'm not I'm

I'm Comrade, kid with the five.

What's going on, man?

Appreciate you.

Comrade Thomas.

What's up?

Stephen.

What's up?

M.F.

What's up, bro? O. mf what's up bro or bittal what's up diogenes what's going on all right guys so

i'm going to do two things uh i'm going to start the space for the second thing uh like basically look two things first thing i'm

going to actually talk about twitch one last time and i'm going to just outline the strategy for

what i'm going to be using the twitch for because i thought about it long and hard and i can explain

why but i've come to the conclusion this is the best thing.

And then the second thing is that I'm going to talk about Paul Pot and Cambodia and clarify where we stand on that whole thing as a party.

Because apparently there's confusion.

You know, I already talked to Johnny about it and my view that it was a mistake to just start a conflict over this and start a discursive vector of polarization over that issue.

But I'm going to actually clarify where we stand on that whole thing and what our view is.

But I'll start the space first and then do it, you know? So that's how we're going to actually do that. We're going to start the space first. And then i will uh i will set about doing that i just want to talk to you before

i start the space about twitch and what the plan for twitch is going to be so i basically, I thought very deeply about all the different factions of Twitch and live

stream fails and what's going on on Twitch and the pipelines that are being established

of radicalization and what possible place I could have on Twitch.

And I came to the conclusion that strategically, strategically it is not possible for me to stream

to Twitch, like I stream to kick and grow. I can't pull from any audience there. There's really nothing I could do. The pipelines are all sealed as far as my ability to sit on this desk and do content. Because anything that I from my desk that that i need to do to grow

is going to require me sacrificing the professionalism and integrity that is deserving and is

expected from a uh executive chairman of a party.

But, and I trust me, this is, this decision has been made with a comprehensive mapping of all of the different factions of the Twitch discourse, XQC, Aidan Ross, Hassan Piker,

the Destiny people, the Hitler gamers and the anime lovers and all those Reditors and whatever whatever asman gold hitler gamers whatever they are

and um you know demographically culturally there is no place for our message just streaming there like sitting at a desk there's no way to do it

but there is a way to do it it just involves something much more right so what i'm going to be

doing with the twitch i'm just going to be basically telling you this is that I'm going to be using the infrared platform on Twitch to IRL stream ACP related stuff, meaning I'm going to be traveling the country, chapter to chapter, going to college campuses and schools, and we are going to do

Mr. Beast style, I guess you want to call it that. We're going to be live streaming our good

works and our community service, our labor organizing, and most importantly our student initiatives,

and that's all going to be IRL, and the place I'm going to be doing the IRS is going to be Twitch.

You see, KIC is not a place that rewards good deeds.

It doesn't have automatic discursive significance.

On Twitch, though, it does.

It has automatic discursive significance

for people to talk about and give it attention.

So Twitch is where I'm going to be live streaming and showcasing party activity.

I'm going to be doing that as well to promote and invigorate more party activity in

general.

It's going to, it's going to basically allow me to constantly travel the country to basically meet with chapters and make sure everything is going smoothly on the ground.

And it's also going to promote the party and it's going to create all the right discursive contradictions that we want.

And from the perspective of the demographics that we're targeting,

this is the move because basically when you think about it,

people don't want to see...

When I am coming from such a radically different place such a radically different

perspective nobody i think is really interested in me just sitting on my desk talking and gibbering

people want to see like what I'm about and my

results and what I stand for in

practice. They want to actually

see it first

and then that gives

justification for whatever discourse

that I'm introducing. That's especially

true for some of the newer generations

like that just don't have any patience for another Hassan Piker to sit on their fucking desk

in a mansion and gibber about their beliefs and ideals without actually walking the walk.

So a lot of thought has been put into this,

and basically that is...

It's going to be IRL streams

that Twitch is going to be used for.

And then I might use it if I ever have to go respond to Hassan or do anything on that front,

but basically exclusively speaking, it's just going to be for the IRS.

And that was the decision I came to.

I was kind of feeling a little down, and I was like, Twitch sucks.

I don't even know, like, there's nothing i could even do there uh because it's like i'm literally a space alien who comes from a different

world and then i was like actually there is something i could do it's just actually show what

our party is doing

and make that exciting and interesting

and make that add

humor to it, add and make it

engaging, make it fascinating,

make it peak people's interest.

And I think that's very possible.

I think it's very, very doable.

It's going to come from more,

it's going to require as well

a lot more

this is more party business

and in our May events

I'll be talking to you guys in person about this.

I know not everyone is coming to the May event, but for those that I think at least one person from each chapter is, and so you'll be able to relay back home what I tell you and communicate to you. But basically, we're going to be collaborating with chapters to produce content

that is engaging, that is stimulating,

simultaneously does

good locally, but also does good

for the overall

message of the party, right?

And it's going to require more intense collaboration on that front.

It is something I'm going to have to run by the Central Committee,

which is I'm telling you this now as far as just to justify why I'm not going to be

using the Twitch actively. That's the only reason I'm telling you about this. I'm not telling you

this because it's like for certain, because the central committee is going to form an early May,

and that's when we're going to be talking about it, debating it and discussing and whatever. But if they approve this initiative...

I don't know what the fuck...

That is. I don't know what the fuck that is.

I don't know what that is.

I'm using a new stream labs

thing that's

integrating the

all the different

Twitch and kick

and I guess it's giving me

notification.

I don't know what's going on.

But,

um,

you know, I wonder if I could accept donations on stream labs.

Because if I can, you know, that would be pretty lit if they unband me and I can finally accept donations again uh tipping

no can't can I

can I

Australia Stanley what's up?

Am I going to be able to accept donations on stream labs?

Hold on.

All right.

Yeah, no, it's, this page is nowhere to be found, huh?

Interesting. What? this page is nowhere to be found huh interesting what what Yo, ABC with the five.

ABC, what's up, man?

Hey, I don't mean to bug you about this, but if you're there, ABC, could you check the messages about that song and just let me know what your availability is?

By the way, you guys don't know ABC.

This is kind of crazy This notification stuff

But ABC is the guy

Who is behind our songs

For our trailer

Um

That's ABC

For our

He's created that banger

it's actually incredible

um

for the when we launched the party

he created the song

uh that beautiful rendition of tramp tramp

tramp by the way we're going to add lyrics to that soon

eventually I need to turn this off this tramp, tramp, tramp. By the way, we're going to add lyrics to that soon eventually.

I need to turn this off, this notification off.

I don't know how to fucking do that.

Alert box. I guess that's it. Just shut it off.

Yeah, so he was behind that, and he's so good at what he does we want him to um

we want him to you don't bro you don't know you definitely don't owe me bro you definitely want him to uh if he can if you can we would love for you to to do another one

because he's it's just a talent that's so rare um and he did it very very well very well executed i don't know if you use a i

well now if that helps at all but if it may be but you you have the skills and know how it's

very good um so let me start the skills and know how it's very good.

So let me start the space and start talking about Cambodia. I also need a co-host.

I need a co-host as well.

I'm going to share the link for the for the space

right here

Discord

All right

All right.

So yeah, I'm going to talk about Cambodia. Kaiser, just wait. i'm going to talk about cambodia uh kaisar just wait i'm going to talk about

cambodia first and i'm going to be doing that in the spaces in case anyone wants to chime in

and officially late arrests all the cambodia discourse and. So basically, guys, I'm going to just tell it to you this way. If you read the American Communist Party Constitution and our Declaration, we espouse a unified tendency of Marxism-Leninism.

And there are notable differences between the unified tendency of Marxism-Leninism versus Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, as synthesized by Gonzalo or as synthesized by the New People's Party in the Philippines.

We have our own kind of synthesis called the Unified Tendency, which basically amounts to this.

We affirm Chinese anti-revisionism, and we affirm Mao Zetong thought,

and we affirm the critique of Soviet revisionism.

We also affirm

Deng Xiaoping thought and Jijun Ping thought,

but one thing that makes us stand apart

is that we still uphold China's critique

of Soviet revisionism.

But in contrast to so-called Maoists, according to the unified tendency, the struggle against revisionism should have always and should be regarded as a secondary contradiction within the context of proletarian dictatorships and socialist states. So, just because some socialist countries go down the revisionist path does not negate the objectivity of proletarian dictatorships,

nor does it erase

the legitimacy and credibility

of socialist construction

entirely.

American

Goddorfis, what's up?

So, for example, all of the Soviet Union itself example all of the uh the soviet union itself and all of the

soviet aligned countries were and still are uh so legitimate socialist countries with

legitimate proletarian dictatorships and the the problem of revisionism is an internal matter.

It's a principally internal matter. And if we have any critique to contribute to the phenomena of

revisionism, it is not for the purpose of attacking these countries. It's not for the purpose of

adding to the besieging. It is rather as a cautionary warning that we do not want to see them

collapse and maybe we don't do this by the way as a party but

i'm just saying even hypothetically that's where we're coming from the ins because mao's thinking

did not fully clarify the question of where the principled Marxist-Leninist stance actually stands

on the objectivity of proletarian dictatorships and socialist states. It didn't actually

clarify that fully. Only when the Warsaw Pact started to go down this path of

dismantling socialism, did the Chinese start writing them letters under Deng saying, hey, listen, we've had outstanding

differences with you,

but you're taking it too far.

Like, this is not what we meant.

We don't think you should dismantle wholesale

and destroy socialism in general.

They didn't want the Soviet Union to collapse.

Mao and the Chinese wanted

some kind of anti-revisionist

thing to happen within the

Soviet Union, but they didn't

actually conceive of

the destruction of the whole thing

wholesale, right? China, obviously, of the destruction of the whole thing wholesale right china obviously had to defend itself and

make all the necessary choices to defend its sovereignty and its territorial integrity it was being besieged by the forces of revisionism,

that we're trying to undermine it and even collaborate with America against it. We fully respect

and understand the Chinese position, but the Chinese could not, they didn't have the energy or the resources at that time to commit to the principle of building an international world socialist block and take responsibility for that. So China could not save the Soviet Union. It couldn't save the Warsaw Pact.

It could not take responsibility for that world socialist geopolitical bloc, right? So there's a lot of nuance when it comes to that.

And, and we uphold, according to our party's constitution, Vietnam is a legitimate socialist

country and a legitimate proletarian dictatorship.

And we're very happy to see more cooperation between socialist countries.

And by no means are we interested in facilitating any kind of division?

Gaddafus, what's going on, man?

So that is,

wow, sleeper cell with the 10.

Thank you so much.

So

let me further clarify our stance

on the question of

Cambodia, specifically, and Pol Pot.

So there have been a lot of memes in the history of the infrared community before the creation of the party.

And these have not always been serious. They have not always been directly some kind of formal communication or whatever that outlines a principled party organization stance.

And I'm not even doing that here.

I'm just kind of, I want to maturely and professionally

communicate the actual kernel of truth behind that view, okay? Which goes as follows.

The revolution in Cambodia, which was indeed a social revolution absolutely corresponded to horrific circumstances of a u.s.

bombing a relentless u.s. bombing of campuchia that was going on that was genocidal in nature as well as a huge degree of social chaos. And definitely, definitely,

Amila with the 10, thank you so much. Definitely, key word here, there were many, many social horrors and atrocities that happened during that

revolutionary experience, which got out of control in many kinds of different ways.

And nobody should be out here denying that or or overlooking that that fact all we have ever wanted to do is communicate the following nuance and the whole thing is a tragedy in retrospect it was a tragedy because the conflict with Vietnam that happened between

Cambodia, Vietnam, and then China, this led the Cambodian revolution to go down a path of not being able to actually have any independent revolutionary principle.

And yes, the Kimmer Rouge ended up just being on the payroll of America

and serving America's geopolitical interests,

losing any kind of original revolutionary sense of principle.

And then, you know, over time, it was defeated, but then the Kimmer Rouge became involved

in criminal organization and so on and so on.

So it was an extreme tragedy what happened.

It wasn't something you should just not have nuance in understanding what happened.

All I or this community, the only thing that we've ever had,

back from the road with the five, thank you so much,

the only distinguishing position we've had is we reject the lack of nuance

and we reject the black and white mischaracterization of that history,

according to which there was no Cambodian revolution. It was all CIA from the very beginning,

and Vietnam came as the savior to save and liberate Cambodia.

See, that is what

we reject.

We don't accept that one-sided

narrative. We also recognize

that the Cambodian revolution

did, this is why it was

tragic, and I've talked about this before, it did speak to a real

and legitimate antagonism and inequality between the urban centers and the rural periphery,

and it did manage to tap into an immense and explosive revolutionary

energy that did exist in the countryside that did speak to a genuine revolutionary grievance

and a new scale and degree of mobilization it ended in tragedy because it was not able to be articulated

in a proper scientific manner, and it immediately fell victim to the immediacy of the fanatical

revolutionary consciousness, which led to a profound social tragedy.

Again, in the midst of an unprecedented scale and campaign of U.S. bombings, where the wholesale

destruction and extermination was happening in the background, right, already.

So it was a profound social tragedy, and it culminated and it ended in tragedy, and that's why it failed.

I have always just insisted upon having an awareness that there was an original, authentic,

revolutionary beginning there, that Vietnamese revisionism and Soviet-aligned revisionism was unable to speak to in any capacity.

There was something awakened among the Cambodian masses that was not being articulated by Soviet-aligned

revisionism.

But oftentimes

people ignore what I've actually said,

right?

The direct conflict that it

unleashed

between various demographics that it unleashed between

various demographics and the violence,

the direct physical violence

at a crazy scale.

I mean, that was a sign

of a profound, aborted

immaturity of that revolution and what do i say i say

between mouse cultural revolution in between what happened in cambodia happened and it was a

profound tragedy and the the matured development of the same revolutionary principle happened in Iran when the Iranian

revolution was largely bloodless but it did correspond to a similar awakening of this peripheral, rural masses that were considered ignorant and backward, rising up against arrogant, institutional, urban elites.

And that is an example of the matured revolutionary principle that is at play here, right?

It should not correspond to direct physical violence.

It should not correspond to social wars of extermination.

It should correspond rather to the elevation politically of a principle that empowers the rural and peripheral masses at the expense of arrogant urban elites.

Dream of Jupiter.

Thank you so much for the five.

So there's so much nuance there compared to, and why we should be a little more mature now.

I'm not saying all the jokes disappear. I'm not saying all the memes disappear. I'm just saying there's no real point in going on X and being reckless about how we communicate our position on this, which is full of nuance, because it serves no purpose whatsoever other than to make us appear fringe and ostracize us, because a lot of people just aren't educated about that history. They're not educated about the fact that so many of the atrocities that are

attributed to the Kimmer Rouge were actually the result of the U.S. bombing. And they were just

attributed to Paul Pot, but it was actually the U.S. bombing, right? And people don't know the nuances.

People don't understand this requires knowledge and education and study,

and you should not just recklessly punish people for not being exposed to that

because most people don't know these facts. If anything, you should

just try to educate people better about it, right? And you should also not be going out of your way

to be promoting division between fraternal socialist nations today

we uphold the legitimacy of vietnamese socialism

and yeah volkwold is right there are also a lot of infiltrators that's very true

and with that came a profound degree of a of a

hold on this guy's got a

really fucked up link

don't click that guy's link

guys I don't know what the fuck that is that's not YouTube

that's some

kind of disgusting

dangerous link. Do not fucking click

that. Never click

a link.

Look at the YouTube.

Wow, that is the sketchiest

link in the world

what the fuck i hope no one clicked that

yeah what a disgusting fuck freak

anyway um yeah we need to freak. Anyway,

um,

yeah,

we need to disable links.

If mods can disable links,

if you know how,

just disable them entirely.

Disable them entirely. Yeah, we should just disable them,

Anyway,

Be careful, guys, never click a link mv what's up

in any case um so yeah that this is our view on on the the whole thing about the vietnam

the cambodian revolution china's position on the matter.

There should be no room for any kind of take that lacks nuance. That's our view.

We just don't believe in having a one-sided view. We believe in fully investigating the facts and not taking at face value

the claims, all of the claims that are made. While there definitely were atrocities and horrible

things that happened, just like in the case of Mao and Stalin and other examples of revolutionary

upheaval. A lot of them are definitely made with the malicious intent of slandering, communism

in general, and again, atrocities that are committed by the U.S. bombings are often attributed to the Kimmer Rouge, right?

So this is our view on the matter.

Revolutions are not necessarily pleasant things, okay?

That is a principle of unleashing total social chaos.

All revolutions unleash extreme forces of chaos and they they unleash these these energies

within the socius that everything is fucking on that like everything is up in the air and they are not pleasant events and it requires a

disciplined effective and most importantly scientific revolutionary leadership to reign in these

forces of destruction and put them to creative and principled use. That did not

happen in Cambodia because of the profound chaos of the U.S. bombings, because of the lack of scientific clarity about the real forces underlying that revolution, and it ended in tragedy. That is our view on it, basically. That is our view. There was an insufficient level of scientific leadership and there was also circumstances and a background of a huge atrocity of u.s bombings so that is my view.

That's not the official party line, because remember, the Kimmer Rouge was unsuccessful, and it no longer exists.

So our party has no stance on the Kimmer Rouge and Paul Pot, which don't exist anymore. But our party does have a stance on Vietnam, which does still exist, and we uphold Vietnam as a legitimate and credible and real example of socialism and the proletarian dictatorship.

So that's our view.

We just emphasize the need for nuance and lack of emotions when studying revolutionary periods in history and not being swept up and overtaken by these immense volumes of propaganda. That's it. That's really just what I say, you know, what I'm saying as infrared in a professional and mature and unironic way without the memes, right?

I would say something the same with Gonzalo.

You know, the shining path committed horrible atrocities, which were documented and are absolutely worthy of condemnation,

and there's no defending those. But to say they weren't onto something would also be one-sided.

To say that they weren't tapping into a unique, social, civilizational, and demographic

reality in Peru that all the established political forces failed to tap into would also be profoundly one-sided. They did manage to discover

something. They just didn't do it in the correct way in terms of applying their insights.

And this is the problem with revolutionary praxis.

In revolutionary praxis, there is a lot of room for making mistakes and making errors.

And errors and mistakes, revolution is nothing to toy with.

So when you make a mistake and you make an error,

it can end in profound fucking tragedy.

Like, revolutionary praxis is similar to, like,

experimenting with explosives.

One wrong fucking move,

and it can all blow up and be really bad, right?

That's why our American Communist Party has this principle of decentralization so that we could absorb mistakes and not allow a conceit to rise to the level of a prescription, an absolute prescription, that fucks the whole thing up.

We want room for people to fail and make mistakes so we can learn from them rather than taking drastic action on the basis of an unproven conceit, you know?

So that's kind of where we stand on that, you know?

We also look, when it comes to the Mao the the the the the mawis in the philippines again we're not one-sided with respect to that either regardless of the contemporary

circumstances and situation clearly the history the cursory glance at the history there does reveal genuine experience with revolutionary praxis.

Now, what has that become today, and now there's a lot of room for debate,

but at least historically, there's no overlooking that and dismissing it wholesale.

So that's what I would like to communicate, you know, basically.

Finally. Now I'll bring on everyone in order. We need someone to co-host. If anyone can co-host, we definitely need a co-host to be able to bring people up that I cannot see.

There's only three people are requesting.

Let me bring on Kaisarian.

Karsarian.

Go ahead.

Good evening, Mr. Chairman.

How are you, sir?

Good.

I'm fine.

How are you?

Very well.

I'm pleased to have this opportunity.

I've been wanting to speak to you for years,

and I'm engaging in a very good faith discussion with you.

I don't know how much we ultimately agree on things,

but I can tell you, I respect you as a committed collectivist and someone who is

unafraid to buck the system. I appreciate that very much. Something that I don't entirely understand,

and perhaps you can help me. Communism has, by which I mean, anything from classical Marxism to Maoism, the whole spectrum of it,

is known to not be particularly pro-religion in the manner that I don't can ever think of a communist party,

though perhaps you can, that has received the endorsement of a religious movement or the church,

if you will, outright. Yet the American Communist Party is very tolerant of religion from a pluralistic point of view insofar as you allow people to have it, or at least your membership is allowed to have it, in their privacy to whatever their conviction may be.

I understand that you personally are a Muslim. Is that correct?

Yeah, I would

say so, but

I don't necessarily

have a problem with people

deciding to call me

something else. It's very

private for me, so it's not else it's it's very private for me so it's not my my my how it's

presented in public it doesn't matter to me much i see are you um are you bothered by public

displays of religious conviction among your membership?

No.

Okay.

So I am a, I'm a Platonist.

I assume you're fairly abundantly familiar with Platonism?

Um,

yeah, I will say this.

While on a personal level, I don't have a problem with anyone identifying with whatever, you know, creed they so deigned to.

But within our party, there are only traditionally established religions that have

roots in historically constituted peoples that exist now are given like a sacred status in terms of we will not blaspheme, we will not offend, we will not cross any boundaries.

But when it comes to something like Platonism, we would not recognize that as a historically legitimate religious tradition

and as such

the bylaws

within our party with respect to

offending the beliefs of Platinus for example

would not be covered

understood with you and this for example would not be covered understood

would you

and this isn't really where I meant to go

but since you say that

would you

be intolerant

of platonic thought

no but I think

we would not give it we would not give it the treatment of a special treatment of a religious belief.

Because for us, we don't want to debate religious beliefs within the party.

We want to respect them.

Whereas philosophy is open, completely open to debate and discussion and whatever.

Of course. Of course. And Platonism, of course, is not a religion, though of course late Platonism

certainly took on certain religious characteristics and then I won't go down that rabbit hole.

And that's understood completely.

And therefore, I imagine you can't help but notice the overlap, at least the mechanics of Marxism and Platonism.

Do you concur or should I expound upon that?

No, it's actually very clear to me that definitely, I would even go so far as to say, is I think Platonism is an inceptual principle of Western philosophy,

and I think Marxism,

uh, in many ways, attempts to rediscover that principle in a really different way,

a materialistic way,

but nonetheless, the, the platonic structure in terms of the acknowledgement of the

acknowledgement of the fact that, you know, there is a unifying and concrete principle of existence

definitely is shared with Marxism.

But I think the similarities start to break down in the detail.

Yeah, so

the objectives seem to be

different. Looking at reading

and I will confess, the

vast majority of

communist literature that I have read

has largely been the little communist

manifesto, which you can knock out in 40 minutes.

On the other hand, I'm very well read in Plainism, or at least I would consider as such.

And reading the conclusions that Marx comes to insofar, at least in the Communist Manifesto, as to how to fix the elements of society, very strongly, in my opinion, seem to draw from Plato's Republic.

We have a ton of things in common, which is why it puzzles me how some Platonists

want to strad the line with fascism, because fascists so very frustrate me. They like to dress

up like us traditionalists, but they go on acting like liberals. They want this, at least in America, for instance,

they want this all-white libertarianism,

and it's also very empty. It doesn't serve either

liberalism or traditionalism.

I agree. I also think that,

I think that the association between Platinism and fascism is also unjustified,

because the fascist principle of collective existence does not recognize collective existence as an independent principle.

In fascism, it's actually the individual that's glorified, and the collective is regarded as a kind of confederation of individual wills. This is what the fascist is. So in a way, it's kind of more aristotelian if you think about it whereas

platonism insists upon a singular indivisible um antecedent collective existence which is not

reducible to the sum of its parts, and therefore it's at least more

proximate toward the communist view than the fascist one.

Certainly.

Fascists are philosophically satanic.

And what I mean by that is they believe in the glorification of the individual.

The Nietzsche and Superman, they want everyone to manifest this godness unto themselves, and therefore

their great collective, for all the rhetoric about race and nation and everything else, they really want this collection of alpha wolves.

And if you fall short of that, then you deserve to get eaten, because that's Darwinism.

Of course, when Jews eat them in their perception, When other people wrong them,

whoever the bad guy group is,

that's unfair. That's unfair

play. But whenever they do it to other

people, that's completely within the laws of nature.

It's also very hypocritical.

But doing just the direction

I mean to, that we concur very strongly about the collective

spirit of the nation, however you define the nation. If you define it broadly as the collection

of all sapient beings for which we

can recognize as all of humanity until

we start discovering aliens

and that there is

a universal morality

there is an absolute

right and wrong

and definitely we start to,

at least I do,

a communist will of course concur.

The very crude way

in which everyone is only ever quantified

anymore by their material possessions

is very degenerate.

This is a really interesting conversation, and I hate to wrap it up, but I do want to conclude this, but I'll conclude it on a note just for the audience's sake.

You will find throughout history very curious and interesting forms of platonic and neoplatonic revolutionary movements in the pre-modern era, where you have

these revolutionary movements that are motivated and guided by ostensibly

Platonist principles. So it's really interesting, actually, how in history, sometimes the

Platinist principles correspond to a new kind of proto-communist

sense of revolutionary

solidarity

to

humble elites and

rebel against

ruling orders and so on and so on.

Mr. Chairman, I was just getting to the part where we could actually debate.

I only wanted to frame it.

Well, I think this kind of debate is going to take up the entire time of the space.

So we should set aside

maybe Sunday or Tuesday

when I go live if you want to have

a more in-depth philosophical debate, but

not for the confront the chairman's space.

Certainly. My apologies.

When Sunday

can I expect?

If you go

in the Discord,

in our Discord

and you go into

the show requests

channel,

just,

I usually go

live at 9 p.m.

Eastern,

Sundays,

Tuesdays, and Thursdays, Thursday to confront the chairman spaces, and

that would be a good time to do it.

Excellent. Thank you so much

for your time, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to

our next conversation. Yep, looking forward

to it.

So look forward to our next conversation. Yep, looking forward to it. So, Kayla, do you want to bring on...

So there are two other requests.

One kind of looks like a bot account,

and then the other one is Rambly,

who might want to talk about too

yeah i see the the the the the bot i'm going to bring on the bot because i'm interested

and what that could pause uh hello hello Hello?

Hello?

Hello?

Hello!

Crypto Web, unmute your mic now or your band.

Yeah, you fucking AI

fucking bot getting so sophisticated.

What a crazy thing.

All right, let's bring up Rambly, the autistic.

How many holes has?

Oh, sorry, was that supposed to you?

My bad.

Oh, hello.

Yeah.

What's going on um there's one thing i do want to ask uh-huh do you know about infrared like there's an infrared supporter out there with the

Pokemon profile pick.

Do you know about him?

No.

Yeah, he

supports a furry.

But anyways, I think

you already know what I want

to ask

um

okay yeah but the thing is

he supports a furry pedophile

I don't know if you know about him

but anyways

here's what I want to ask

your alt

is it not? No it's not

are you sure about that? It's not my alt are you not? No it's not. Are you sure about that?

It's not my alt. Are you sure?

It's not my alt. Are you sure

Rambly? I'm sure about

it. I hope you're sure about it because if

I'm sure about it. I hope you

are. I am sure

about it. How much you want to bet?

My entire life savings.

That's not my own.

Will you actually complete your entire life savings?

Yes.

How much is that?

I'm not funny enough.

I'm going to have our legal department send you a document where you put in writing that you will commit your entire life savings.

That you have nothing to do with that alt?

I have nothing to do with that alt i have nothing to do with that account okay no i don't know our legal department is going to send you a document so you we we formally

commit to the agreement that if we can prove that it's yours, that you

will give us your entire life savings.

Okay, I guess.

Are you going to stand by and be ready for that?

Yeah, I'll stand by it.

Okay, the second question.

How many holes do women

have below the belt how many holes do you know what the sonic song blue hedge how many holes has how many holes come on don't

how many holes come on

how many vaccines does it take to cure autism

no how many holes do women have below the belt

come on keep it answer the question

how many vaccine holes do you have all over how many vaccine

holes do you have

all over how many holes

how many holes

are you actually

going to push anti-pox propaganda

come on how many holes

do women have below the belt

you know and then How many holes do women have below the belt? You know, an entire extinct species got revived, and now, and you can't even answer this question.

How many holes?

They call me Sonic, because i am done how many holes come on has how many holes do women have below the belt answer the question, dude.

I guess he left.

I guess he just gave up.

I guess he just gave up.

He's like,

all right, I just quit.

This is so stupid.

All right.

Anyway,

is there anyone else requesting? Kayla, is there anyone else requesting

uh something about...

ACP! What's up?

Did the space crash? No way.

No way.

Uh-oh.

Uh... Guys, thumbs up if you could still hear me in the space

Okay, it's just Kayla

Yeah, I'm good

Uh, I'm good.

I need someone to help me co-host this.

Let me find people that typically are speaking in spaces that are from our community.

Infrared.

Oh, this is the alt.

Yeah. Yeah, this person

is the

a literal alt

of Rambley

um

maybe they gave their account

we basically have proof of it

but they basically gave their account

maybe to someone else

is why they're requesting isn't it interesting i accuse them of that and then they go into

their group chat to be like no no no this is our we're gonna the fact that you're now requesting

just proves it okay what coincidentally uh ESK what's up what's up let's see the the magic trick of a

completely different person go ahead go ahead go ahead speak go ahead and speak

yeah can't

yeah can't

cat got your tongue I guess

what a hilarious prank what a hilarious Yeah, can't I cat got your tongue, I guess.

What a hilarious prank.

What a hilarious prank. Come on, Rambley, what's what's up with it?

Cat got your tongue?

Yeah. yeah good thing you didn't sign that document you know like what the hell anyway... Let's see.

CryptoWeb is back.

I hope crypto web has something to say this time.

Go ahead, CryptoWeb.

CryptoWeb, go ahead. web How are you? Good. How are you?

I'm good.

Where are you coming out? Where are you based in, sir?

I'm from Nigeria.

Algeria.

Yeah.

All right. And what brings you to the confronted chairman's pace today, sir?

I'm listening for...

What?

Take to what?

What? What? Takeo.

What?

Okay, they left.

I don't know what the fuck that was.

But it definitely... Oh, he said Nigeria.

Okay, great.

Perfect.

Excellent.

I mean, that's what we're looking for when it comes to crypto

for our party.

We're looking for Nigerian crypto business opportunities.

For sure, you know, that's definitely the most important thing for a confronted chairman space.

Hispanic American Studies. Hi. What's up?

Hello?

Hello?

Yeah.

Can you hear me?

Yep.

Hi. Yeah. Hi. Has, uh, you know, I watched a video recently where you talk about how, um, Hispanic shouldn't be forced to choose between their indigenous and their Spanish identity do you remember that um may not really but it's it's fine um i i thought that was great and i'm glad to hear it and um i wanted to ask

regarding the united states in a post-revolutionary situation.

Do you understand or do you conceive of the U.S. as basically becoming another country in the world or is it a more of a socialist empire strategy um it would be a country but it would not be a nation state.

Jupiter, what's up?

What does that mean?

Well, it would be a big country, but it would not be... It would be a big country of multiple peoples, but it would not be a nation state. It would not be an empire in the sense of

occupation force or an imperial hegemon that oppresses and occupies people. would be a shared uh socialist country like the uss are

so perhaps you could say an empire in the classical sense as in the you know pre-capitalist sense

um yeah well yeah but you know if you say that people will go oh you want America to be an empire and it's a bad thing

optically because the US right now

there's US imperialism that exists now, you know,

and using

words like that

would be a recipe

for inviting people

to mischaracterize your position.

Yeah, yeah, I see that i see the the word empire is totally uh seems problematic um but you know

the soviet union in a in a classical sense in a classical sort of, you know, political theory sense.

Yeah, I know. I know. I know exactly what you mean. But such is the nature of using language in a bad faith you know environment of information warfare

you could mean one thing but people will misrepresent what you mean because the word can have

another association which you're which is not your intention to convey right right yeah i i see that it's just you know something i wrestle with a lot

in terms of you know thinking about what is it that the united states as as an empire in the

classical sense right you know will sort of project onto the world in a in an

affirmative universalist manner right in terms of like i think i think that um i don't think that a soviet would be a global empire or a global polity. It would be an American one, specifically the current territory of the United States and Canada, and hopefully a merger with Mexico on an equal basis between different revolutionary dynasties.

Mexico has its own revolutionary tradition.

If there could be a merger between the two, that would be great great but it would not be one absorbing the other

in that case okay that's that's interesting um so why why stop at mexico and why not pan-americanism

well i'm i'm not necessarily, I'm not necessarily stopping at anything, but it's, what imposes borders are different levels of historical

development and revolutionary political development

and it's not my interest that

forceful exporting of the revolution

would occur

so the Soviet Union had neighbors and would occur.

So the Soviet Union had neighbors, and it did not seek to forcefully export its revolutionary empire in all directions.

But, you know, I'm sure that it would be a tremendous influence and boon to revolutionary forces abroad if the United States turned red, you know, including in

Central America and South America and so on.

So what it takes to develop and cultivate independent political authorities.

That's really what it is, you know.

There are different centers and polarities.

There's a center within Mexico.

There's a center within North America.

There's a center in South America, you know.

It's all about where the center of power would be, you know.

And the kind of multilateral framework framework you would not have a single center

so would it be in the united states's interest to have its center its, um, pivot towards the southwest and favor a more,

you know, bi-cultural, bilingual integration with the Hispanic world.

Such things can't really be

planned for in advance.

Because

there is also the bridge to

Eurasia in the north,

you know, which would probably

be very decisive and important. i think we're getting ahead of

ourselves as well because it's it's all about the circumstances of a revolution revolutionary

situation and war that would determine things like that not what we can envision here and now.

Yeah, that's, that's, that's, that's totally fair. But considering the fact that, you know,

um, Mexico will probably, you know, when shit hits the fan, um, as you have said in some, you know, shit hits the fan

as you have said in some

you know one of your streams you said

if shit hits the fan you're going to escape to

Mexico right because most likely

most likely Mexico is going to be on our

side it's definitely not going to be Canada so territorially

speaking yeah I think Canada I think that's possible remember

there are a class enemies within Mexico as well there are counter-revolutionary

forces within Mexico the the great boon as far as the Mexican side of things, has been Morena. That has been a great thing. That has been a movement that has empowered the left-wing forces within Mexico, but it can't be taken for granted you know the fourth

uh fourth revolutionary moment as they put it right right i mean i have my critiques of

of morena but but yeah i, it is an interesting development, and I think it's certainly interesting that you make that comparison between the sort of Eurasian outreach and

the Pan American outreach, right?

These would be two different

projects that perhaps don't

necessarily have to contradict each other.

Right. Well, in any case,

thank you for the question.

I think we're going to have to wrap it up there,

unfortunately. But yeah, so let's bring on Ultra Blue. What's going on, Rambly? family.

You want me on?

Yeah, didn't you call yourself a pedophile earlier?

No.

Yeah, you said that

the account that you were

presenting as was some kind of furry

and they followed a pedophile.

That was red.

That was red.

I'm blue. I'm completely

different.

Oh, but you're... Okay, so it's like a multiple personality disorder thing, like from the movie split.

Or is it like severance where this is the any or the outer?

Or maybe just accept the fact that we're

different people

or maybe it's like severance where there's like

inies and outies and there's like different personalities

we're different people

anyways

are you going to talk about

vaginas again?

It's an anatomy

question. How many holes

do women have below the belt?

Are you transgender?

No.

Why do you hate trans people?

I don't hate trans people.

Are you sure? Say you quit. I don't hate trans people. Are you sure?

Say you quit?

I don't.

I just...

There's something a little bit transphobic about your fixation.

It's just...

It's an anatomy question, dude.

Define women for me.

Why don't you do that?

Someone who identifies as a woman.

So it seems like you're making a lot of anatomical infections.

You're not going to run away from this

lower that

I'm not here

don't run from the question rambly

because I think I've cornered you a little bit here

you know you come on every Thursday asking

this question about

women, so how do you define that

according to you? And

what makes your definition

according to you not transphobic? Go ahead,

Rambley. Go ahead.

I'm blue. Yeah, but you're transphobic, correct?

How do you explain to your trans allies

how you're throwing them under the bus like this?

I'm not. I'm not throwing them under the bus.

It's an anatomy question.

We're all confused. Just answer.

What about trans?

Otherwise?

Well, your question cannot be answered because

according to your definition of what a woman is,

even you could be a woman.

No, I'm a dude because I identify as a dude.

What if you identified as a woman?

I don't because...

What stops you from doing that?

What stops you from it?

I don't have gender destroyer.

What if you did?

What would you do?

I get surgery for it, but I don't.

I know I don't.

So you have to get surgery for it to

yeah you just got completely destroyed rambly you just got

destroyed rambly you just got destroyed all right you're transphobic clearly

you're trying to you're a biological essentialist, apparently,

because you're asking a question about gender identity

and tying it to biological anatomy,

which is so transphobic,

Rambly. It's like your J.K. Rolling.

What a terrible

person. That guy's such a fascist piece of shit.

Wow.

Wow.

Slicker, what's up, man?

And yeah, I'm unbanned.

I'm unbanned, but I don't think I'm going to be going back, at least in the old way, because they take 50% of your money and they

you know what's the point

hello charm hole

it was a old friend

so I hear you're a really big fan of me

now

now I've always been a big fan of me now.

Now I've always been a big fan of you.

I've always appreciated. Well, I check my DMs quite often and you're always telling me to kill myself and all

these things.

Some,

we do some light trolling.

I hope you enjoy the memes.

So what's going on?

Well, first and foremost, I want to say congratulations on your unbanning of Twitch.

Thanks.

Yeah, it's pretty great.

You'll finally be able to talk to all the nerds like Rambly.

There's going to be a lot more Ramblies soon if you start streaming again.

So good luck with that.

But yeah, I just wanted to say a few things, if that's all right, especially, you know, concerning the ACP.

First off, I think you've got some bad groups, bad people in your Discord, your general area.

Are these the people

that just so happen to you, you have

gotten into interpersonal, parisocial

conflicts with?

Well, if you just look at the data, right?

From Danny Shaw down, there's been

quite a few people, actually. Danny Shaw has there's been quite a few people

actually Danny Shaw has not never been

IGG that guy was always

not an IGG guy he came from

from

east to more

traveling the world

well I remember traveling the world well

I remember seeing him in Michigan

and I remember talking

there was no yeah but he wasn't there as IGG

he was brought in by people who

trusted him.

And he,

um,

he, you know,

he was in the driveway as during that time.

That's when it happened.

Right.

Yeah.

Well,

you seem to be much more,

uh,

a threat to your organization

than I ever have been

as a working, as an actual working

American American-

I'm a good. We were pissed

about it, but we've

ever, no one's holding a grudge, right?

It's just that you've sent some really

crazy messages to me

on X which are pretty crazy

so it's just some edgy shit man because I'm bored

and I'm trying to get your ear dude I just want to get back in

because I think I can be helpful

see you're laughing but right Charmole you're not going to be a lot because I think I can be helpful.

See, you're laughing, but... All right, Charmole, you're not going to be allowed in the party after the shit you said to me, right?

I'm just going to tell you straight up.

It's not happening.

Well, I'm going to tell you straight up that you're the most...

You are actually legitimately autistic.

Like, actually. I've seen how you're in a public space. All right. Like, actually.

I've seen how you have in a public space.

All right.

That's fine.

I could be autistic.

But the problem,

and I'm going to make this criticism of you.

And if you're truly,

truly a candidate for our movement,

you will take this to heart and show improvement and then we'll talk about it

but you have a problem of fucking not taking yourself seriously to such a point where you do crazy

schizo shit like go in my DMs

and tell me to literally kill myself

and call me the N-word, right?

I'm not worried about me

because I don't care. I'm worried about how you would

react to differences

and problems

and all these other things. You have to sort it out and become upstanding and fix yourself. And everyone gets a chance. And I'm giving you that chance. Prove over a long-term period that you can be a normal person.

And if you genuinely want to join this movement,

and you're heart of hearts and you're sincere about it,

you have to show some improvement. You have to show...

I just... You have to do some effort

By not messaging you for like two years

No you messes me last week

Dude I'm literally going to check my fucking DMs right now

Because I could have sworn

Yeah

I got a message from you like a fucking week ago

Let's see what it said.

Yeah, no, I'll look at it too.

I know what it said.

Charmhole.

You should share the video.

I think you're, it's an anime, it's an anime guy with a chainsaw.

Oh no, it's a guy who's handing a gun outside of the, um, an anime guy with a chainsaw oh no it's a guy who's

handing a gun outside of the

um an anime guy who's handing

a gun that's outside of the

jpeg

and it goes

and his speech pulls

I think you're a F word,

because I'm professional,

I can't say that now,

and you should kill yourself,

use this,

and he's handing me the gun.

So this is the problem.

It's a funny meme

that you should share

against people you don't like.

Well, that's just not the type of material level to join our movement.

It's just not, we can't have that.

You know, you sent me another slur-laden message with just the, the the it's literally the

exodia of slurs

that you sent right before that

see see you're trying to do the whole

cancel culture thing right now

you realize cancel culture listen dude

in the real. In the real

world, in the real world, you can't be

talking like that, all right? In the real

world, I know for a fact you say

worse shit to Hinkle and Zirka

in real life, and Hinkle said worse.

I know this for a fact, okay?

It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter what anyone says. What someone

says in private doesn't fucking matter.

What you say in public is an optics

disaster.

What I said in public,

oh, you mean when I defended ACP

and what I got

for it? God knows who else you're

That's not public, retard.

DEMs aren't public. I know it can be public

because if you're sending it to me, you're probably sending

it to everyone in the world.

What? Who?

What are my discord of like 50 people?

Charmel, you need to accept self-criticism.

CNN came up to you and asked and talked to you.

And you said you forgive Hitler.

Why would that be the first thing to come on your mind?

First off, first off,

that's not what I said. That's what you

remember because you want to

hate me, but you can't because

I am. That's what it was

reported. You told the fucking

CNN journalists that you forgive him.

No, no, no. Let's

clear the air. Let's clear the air because I was at that

event and it was amazing and I met some really

amazing young men and this one dude,

I wish I could remember his name. He told me about this

esoteric French mathematician. I wish I could

remember, but I can't. I didn't write it down because

I was so busy.

But no, let's get their fucking record straight, okay?

I go there and before then, right, you said that you guys were getting documentary.

You did not say it was CNN.

I didn't know it was CNN until Hinkle is on the stage and he goes,

and we have CNN here

after I had talked to him.

My fucking heart sank.

I was like, oh shit.

I was just talking.

Charmole, I don't want to fucking sit here

and have a trial.

I don't care about... I'm taller than you. I don't care about...

I'm taller than you.

I don't care.

Listen,

I'm not here to have a trial

and punish you.

I'm here to give you an example

of behavior

that you need to reflect on and fix.

My behavior is better than Danny Shams

or all these other assholes who've been in your shit.

All right.

Charmold,

what did I tell you?

I said,

I want to see improvement.

I want to see you seriously.

Take a turn towards something more professional,

more serious.

And we could talk about.

I'll go work at the local factory and I'll donate

$100. No, that's no.

And I won't DM you for two years.

Yeah, no. Because I see that's how you get close to you.

Let's start with you not DMing me crazy stuff.

All right. Orvo, what's up?

They're just jokes. All right, butvo, what's up? They're just jokes.

All right, but you have to learn how to control your

your joking.

And you have to learn how to be

disciplined, all right?

And I'm literally giving you a chance

to do that.

All right.

And you know, Jackson

probably would... Jackson wouldn't even want to give you a chance, and that. All right. And you know, Jackson, probably would...

Jackson wouldn't even want to give you a chance,

and I'm giving you one, right?

Well, at

the IFA,

the IFAP, right,

Institute for Free American Palestine,

right?

Great,

great name, by the way. That's not the name. So, right? Great, great name,

by the way.

That's not the

name.

So,

so,

so,

it was,

Institute for

free America

in Palestine,

that's IPAP.

It's not,

it's not,

it's not,

I think,

I'm not, Institute for

free America

and Palestine.

It's just institute for free America. It's not in the name. Oh, okay. My bad. Well, so I was the one who

tried to warn you because I got freaked out, right? Because I mentioned Hitler once. I mentioned

Hegel 30 fucking times. Did that make the CNN cut? Obviously not, right?

But I got scared because I mentioned Hitler.

Thank God it did.

Yeah.

And I warned, no, and I warned you in good fucking faith.

I came up to you and I said,

Haas, we might have an issue.

All right.

You made a mistake.

And you, and what you did was Jackson was in a fucking, he was in an, he was in an honest God conversation with other people. And you just started yelling, Jackson, Jackson at the top of your fucking lungs. You embarrassed me publicly. You know how hard that is to embarrass Charmhole? I was getting red in the face

I was like oh my God he's like talking to somebody

important and you're like Jackson

because it's crazy dude because Charmoles

had and I was trying to want you on the private

even though even if you made

a mistake on accident

we went did so much planning for that event.

It was so important.

CNN came.

Imagine CNN, they air you saying you forgive Hitler and that's our movement.

How is that fair to us?

They didn't.

No, thank God they didn't.

But you could imagine why we would panic

they edited it they edited it so well i was praising you the entire time i was talking about how great

charles was and hagel and how he turned me to hegel nobody they edited it to make me look like i'm gay for him

charm hold Nobody is here

to crucify you.

We just want you

to be aware that

you need to improve

and make an effort and show an effort

in good faith and then

you will be taken with the seriousness you want to be taken with all right i'll stop calling you

brownoid i'll stop saying nick foentes is a better debater than yeah you i'll stop saying zirka is a god king compared to you

start all that shit you have to start being professional and disciplined okay yeah

I'll start donating to ACP no you don't have to donate you know you don't have to donate even

a penny you just have to show and clean up your act that's it yeah like Hgelian e-girl did

where's she at

she was you know trying to tell the one cool dude

I met trying to say how he's not even in the party

hit on him

it was she tried

it doesn't look listen to it it doesn't even matter right i told you what i had to tell you

you got to take a chill pill you got to have some collective discipline or some discipline in

professionalism and that's what i love you guys i love the work you're doing i just i'm worried

it's too liberal.

Okay, that's the, bro, I don't know.

What do you mean?

See, that's the issue, you know?

If you don't like the work we're doing, then I don't know what you want.

I do like the work you're doing.

I'm just worried that more Danny Shaw type shit might happen.

And I'm trying to be the guy.

Look, I'm trying to be there.

I know how Discord works.

I know how Reddit works.

I know how the internet works.

That guy did not.

You got people and you got people.

It's not just him.

I just keep using him because he's obviously like the top one that really

fucked everything well he tried to all right but you got other guys that are little that are smaller

like versions of him right like this little tiny dude who tried to kick me out of the VIP event right

because i didn't spend the extra $40 because he got sold out this little fucking brownoid's trying

to kick me out.

I'm like, no, no, I know these guys.

Dude, listen, I literally told you to fucking improve yourself and you're talking about brownoids.

Like, what a disaster, all right?

You got to, you have some serious reflection to do. You have some serious contemplation to do. You have some serious, you got to really think about this shit, all right? Because literally right off the bat you've got this

impulsivity you know and that's the problem

there's no one requesting at the moment

yeah i can I can see.

Well, it's a shame.

So many people have so much to say about us an awful lot.

Um... uh-huh there's a you yoopos. All right, go ahead. Starz Hunter. Um, hold on. Um, Um, Um, hold on. Amirio, can you check your message in the mod thing? All right.

So, yeah, they didn't say anything. Okay. There's the Marx Midwestern account that's in the listener.

I invited to speak in

Listener

I am invited to speak in

Listen

A thread I am invited to speak in the listeners. I am I going to speak in

Listen to read.

I'm going to speak in

Listen to read.

Oh my God.

Sorry, there was like a feedback problem.

What were you saying?

Mark's Midwestern is in the

listeners. I invited to speak but they won't come up.

They've been posting a lot about our party.

Isn't that just Andrew?

Yeah, and they just left, actually, as I said that.

Yeah.

Okay, I mean...

You know, that's...

That's fine fine I mean you know that person's going to be getting some

never mind uh anyway uh yeah Uh, Michael. Mm-hmm. I had to see Michael

I was

going to see Michael.

Go ahead.

Um, I was, if you're familiar with Thomas Massey.

He's like a senator in the United States.

Yep, I am.

Um... in the United States? Yep, I am. I don't know.

Do you think there are already

like forces

sort of inside

the United States

government that are kind of

pushing for

um sort of like volcanization i guess

like within the united states i don't know but i don't know how he would be uh someone doing that

i mean i guess there's just, like, the idea that, I don't know, just, I mean, I guess what if you were talking about the United States in a capacity of like the shared like kind of government of like U.S. and Canada or like of North America

Um

Would you

sort of

like

rearrange

uh

kind of thing Hey look man I'm so sorry but this question is just it's just taking a drag

on my on my existence i'm i'm i'm sorry i can't i don't mean to be rude but it's like i just

cannot i don't have it in me me to continue listening to whatever that is all

right I'm really sorry oh yeah well Oh, yeah.

Well... You know, Jovian tag

sure go ahead

go ahead Go ahead.

All right, he left, but we have another.

Go ahead, Al.

Hey, Alz, how's it going?

Good, how are you?

Good, good.

You're talking earlier about,

I don't know if that whole Khmer Rouge thing started with the red operative Lenin or whatever, that account. Would you summarize what your point was

as these people, these, you know know these so-called communists and and their reaction to that sort of discussion as being simply an absence of dialectics

I look I don't I don't consider this topic to be decisive or important in any immediate sense.

All right.

I just everyone should study history and study the facts without bias and investigate the facts.

And that's really all I have to say.

I don't I think it is really useless to create a vector of polarization around that issue

because Vietnam still exists and it's a legitimate socialist country,

which we, you know, and the Kimmer Rouge does not exist, you know, so I don't know what to say, you know and and and the chimeroos does not exist you know so I don't know what to say

you know

okay yeah that's fair

um

I wanted to extend this to you know

like uh the last couple

of streams you've been talking about

uh huh I'm Piker and his support of bernie and aOC

at those rallies um i feel like what he's he's missing a dialectical view um of trump's presidency

just seeing it as,

you know,

it's something that happens in history

sequentially

rather than a culmination of

of forces.

Look,

I'll just simplify it, right?

The fundamental hypocrisy of Hassan Piker is that on the one hand, he will respond to anyone that points out that he's tailing Democrats with, listen, we live in the real world.

This is an opportunity and this is a platform to push things more left, you know, this is the real world,

this is not some insane, you know, pure dogma that, you know, sectarian thing. And, you know,

when you consider overall this, their significance on the national stage, it's good

because of this effect it has objectively.

It's like, well, if you

apply that logic consistently, you will find that the

effect Trump has is way better

than Bernie Sanders and AOC by that

logic.

So, that's the problem. By his own logic, there's no reason he shouldn't be supporting Trump,

according to his own logic. And when we have an even more principled position than him and simply said in the MAGA movement, not in Trump's presidency, we're not even trying to pressure Trump's administration or his presidency, just the movement that, you know, effectors of radicalization and discourse have opened up in such a way that makes it possible to communicate communist ideas in a new context.

That's apparently insane.

And suddenly only then does he want to be ideologically principled and say, no, no, no, no, that's right wing.

No, no, no, that's this, that's that.

Well, apply his same purity testing to his fucking Democrat tailism, and he's a hypocrite.

He wants one or the other.

He wants to say, I'm a pragmatist, and I'm going to support Bernie and

O.C. If you're a fucking pragmatist, then just be a Maga-Communist.

That's the pragmatic thing. If you want to be a complete, pure

sectarian, then be that. But when he's dealing with us Maga communists, he postures as a

principled leftist, but when he's dealing with pushback and criticism on his support for Bernie

and the Democrats, he wants to be a realist, who only cares about the objective opportunities opened up by divisions within the hegemony.

So that's the problem with Hassan, you know?

Gotcha, yeah.

Um... Gotcha. Yeah. Um, okay. Yeah.

Uh, only other thing that I have to say is I'd suggest, uh, I mean, not, not that I'm in a place to suggest, but I listen to Theo Vaughn's

podcast, and he's in a

prime position for a maga-communism

or, you know, the

NCP movement. I'm aware, but

you know, reaching him, it's not the

easiest thing in the world

for us. We haven't tried, but, you know, it's not a walk in the park.

Yeah, if we've had the opportunity, we'd love it.

I think that's absolutely a big audience that you can get after. So that's all I'd say thanks appreciate it see you later man so uh yeah Thank you. You know, all right guys we're probably going to wrap the space up because you know people are too cowardly to confront

uh me which is not a surprise.

It's actually pretty standard.

We have Spanish-Dominican king coming up.

That's just Richie.

Okay, Richie, we're going to wrap up right now, but if you want to say some few closing words, that'd be great.

What's going on, Richie? How are you? I think he's having trouble connecting.

But there's another two now. Okay, who are the other two?

Set the cron.

I just added them.

All right.

Go ahead. Yes. step the cron I just added them all right go ahead

yes

so I have a question

about something

I'm not really

an opponent

I'm an infrared member

but I do have a question

something related

to Trotskyism

and left-wing communism

and I'm still learning so I apologize something related to Trotskyism and left-wing communism.

And I'm still learning, so I apologize if I'm not well-learned

on some things, but if I'm not mistaken,

Trotsky was critical

of the later Soviet Union

because he thought it was too authoritarian,

not democratic enough

and other things.

Am I right about that?

Trotsky himself, or what did

you say?

So, again, I'm still learning,

but wasn't Trotsky, for different reasons, but wasn't he against the Soviet Union for being too authoritarian under Stalin and later on? No, no, no. He was against the Soviet Union because he regarded Stalin as a vulgar populist who basically brought in a bunch of, in Trotsky's mind, lowly, unenlightened Russian peasants into the bureaucracy and into reigns of power.

And Trotsky wanted this to be gate kept only for the, you know,

Europhile, enlightened intellectuals like himself.

And he wanted to be more authoritarian than Stalin against the peasant majority and failed and was outmaneuvered. And Trotsky basically, it was a class war of attempting to maintain the prestige and dictatorship of, you know,

the petty bourgeois intellectuals against the majority of the population, right?

So that was Trotsky's problem.

Okay, so that does change my question a little bit.

I know a big problem with left-wing communism is that, at least in my understanding,

is that it's too, I guess, libertarian in the sense.

Not necessarily.

Okay, well, I was thinking...

No, I mean, the Italian wing of left communism, so-called left communism, they're even proto-fascistic in terms of their kind of organicist totalitarianism

that they support.

Okay, well, I guess

the root of the question I want to ask

is a big reason

from my understanding that

that some socialist and communist countries

aren't as so-called politically open or free, more regimented, is that because you obviously have to have a counter-revolutionary force by the people's government.

Well, if the United States successfully has an American revolution, because I understand that America is a big player in these counter-revolutionaries in other socialist countries. If America

becomes communist,

does that mean that more left-wing

forms of communism can't play out

in America? Or will it still

be more right-leaning

or a centralist?

I'm not, I'm kind of confused by the question.

You know, I will say that the, the, the access of political differences among communists are not based on their administrative views.

And they're not based on procedural views.

They're based on fundamental differences with respect to strategy

and party discipline and so on and so on.

But they're not based on different systems because there's only been one system, which is the socialist system overseen by the followers of Lenin.

Okay, thank you.

I guess I still have some learning to do. Thank you for your time.

Thank you. Appreciate it.

All right, I think we're going to wrap up the space. Who is requesting besides Pesto Maim, Kayla?

Uyo or Jujoov, Saras Hunter.

All right, bring them on, and that'll be the last person.

Go ahead. All right. All right. We're ending the space.

I mean, there's...

That's it.

They're not saying anything.

Space is ending.

It's over.

We're going to wrap it up. Thank you. You know, All right. Thank you. You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, and Sleeper Cell. Sleeper cell, what's up?

All right, I think we're gonna wrap up.

We're gonna to wrap up.

We're going to wrap it up.

I think I had some stuff to talk about or say...

No.

I think I'll see you guys Sunday. Yeah, see you guys Sunday.

Something really interesting is coming, by the way.

And I think it's going to be very exciting for really interesting is coming by the way and

I think it's going to be very exciting

for you guys hopefully

this weekend

but

big

big things

big things stay tuned

stay tuned okay Big things, big things. Stay tuned.

Stay tuned.

Bye bye.