I'VE RETURNED. | SOVINTERN

The

Bha-Benned-Badde-Dade-Dade-Bennan-N-A-D-D-Bennan-N-A-N-N-A-N-N-D-D-N-D-D.

B-A-N-N-D-D-D. and the day, uh, day, na, nana, uh, Let's go ahead.

Zavowice,

Stombe, shirangue, smithes, On the battle You're You know You

Go ahead

Shaggay

You

Goet

Realtte Recell

Arrise

Rue

To

On the

Teletar

and Sett Sett S Dela for your On the war Forlid,

Rally,

Darae

Sadella

Sadella Ska Oh, oh, oh, oh!

Hey! Robo-chee-Krisian,

Zasimmy the vintoshes the vintoshes

Strelty to the goal, windstlecky and just

the goal

to

let's

the

rome

let's not

the ruggs

rome

robuch

class

and shriek and

rugg

robb class so hard Yeah, Robotscheevo

class

A

Krepca She's

RUca and uh...

Oh

Oh

Woo The agop of communists

Stalnese, we're

We're

We're

We're in the warringes We're

We,

Krasnoy

We,

Krasnoy

We're We're

We're

We're

We're

We're

We're We We We We're in between us with us by We're not

We're not stooped

We're

We're

We're same

We're

Aeneism

Our

Our path

Our

Our Our storm

capital

The

whole world

Of the

In fact

in

In the

Tawrit In the

Svote To

Svvado

Svado To Boise D Thank you, Tomarish, Boris, for freedom Oh Oh, Oh

Oh god uh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh allah god god chinting allah god god god god god god The star is bright, horizon red.

The blade is swift and horses tread on

Allah Cosmos Sending Big

Ha'u.

Allah cosmos

speaking Big

Allah Post

changing

Big

Ha la Cosmos Seeding

Big

Allah Cosmos Seen Big Allah Allahosmoschisimbing Allah Allah

Moschimbing

Allah Allah

God God

God

Hussein

Raft us

for us to heed your revolutionary dynasty.

Hey!

Allah was supposed to be,

Allah,

Ha la Khosmoking in day!

Ha lauqo's won't get in day! allah cross-noburnity in three all-a-poll

democracy in-day

all-a-pond-mol-k

A-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-l all the cosmos is in praying from babylon

to linen's fight

the earth has turned

and within might

allah cosmos

is in pain

allah

cosmos in pain

allah

cosmos in pain

allah

cosmos is in

thing

hey

ya

yah yahon, yon, yon, yeah, y'all, y' yo, oh, yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Allah cosmos, jing,

Allah cosmos

hidden pain,

Allah cosmos

sitting

pain, Allah God God Godla, cosmos, in pey, Gallo, Cosmosy in peck,

blah,

God, God,

God,

God, God,

God,

God, God,

God,

God, God,

and God, God, and God, I'm going to be my my

my

and I'm God Oh Oh Oh I don't know. I'm going to be.

I'm going to

I'm going to

see what I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I don't know. You're going to be a lot of the people.

And I don't know.

I don't know. and the I'm going to be able to be.

I'm

and

I'm going to

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm not

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm I'm The and the other people. I don't know. I'm not going to be.

I'm going to have a lot.

I'm going to have a lot.

I'm not

I'm

and

I'm going to be a lot

I'm going to

I'm going to and you're

a lot

and I'm going to be able to be able to be. and the I'm not

I'm

I'm and

I'm going to be. I'm going to

I'm going to What's up everyone?

What's up,

Comrade Thomas with the 10.

What's up, bro?

Appreciate you.

With the 5. What's up, bro? Comrade K. Appreciate you, brother.

Base populace. What's up, man?

Let's get the energy turn up in here. Let's get a sun gorilla march. What the fuck is this?

Let's get the energy up. I'll explain. I'll explain. Don't worry.

A lot I can explain. Orvo, what's up, bro? How are you doing?

Well, I didn't give you all much of a head notice for this shit. To be fair, you know, I said one

hour before the stream,

I'm like,

yo,

we're back.

I actually wasn't

planning on streaming

tonight.

I was planning

on streaming tomorrow.

Okay?

But,

uh,

we're here.

And fuck,

it's like,

it feels like it's been years.

Uh, I'm gonna try to keep the cursing.

I don't give a fuck.

By the way, hold on.

Let's calm down.

All right.

There's a lot.

There's a lot we got to catch up on.

The first thing I want to do is make an excuse for why I've been gone for so long.

And I want to talk about that.

I've been in Moscow since I left Friday.

I left Moscow Friday.

And then I went to New York

for a rally for May 9th with the

New York chapter and with the Russian community

there. We had a run in

with some Ukraine

people. I don't fucking know.

They were very much outnumbered

by us.

And we, at

ACP people, were having a fun time

trolling them.

I remember it like it was yesterday because it was yesterday.

Anyway, that's what I've been up to.

And then I came back home.

I was supposed to actually get home later tonight,

but I changed my flight to come home earlier.

And then, you know, I couldn't go to the gym. And I was like, okay, I'm just going to stream tonight.

I was going to stream tomorrow Monday, but Monday's not even a typical time in which I stream.

So, you know, I could have hyped up to stream more.

I could have given you more of a notice.

I could have told you, yo, I'm going to be back.

But do we need the theatrics?

Do we need the needless ceremony?

No, let's just get back into it.

Okay, we're getting back on schedule.

Starting now, you know?

But let me give you, let me explain to you why I've been gone first of all so i was in moscow from the 24th until friday recent friday and um i was there for the soventurn Turn Conference, which I've known about, okay, first time I went to Moscow this year.

I don't know if you saw the photo of me in Galloway inside the Kremlin, I was there in February, right?

The reason I was in Moscow in February was actually to discuss and prepare for Soventurn.

You know, the ACP has a very notable presence as one of the founding parties of Soventurn, and I went to Moscow to discuss with them

how we want this whole thing to go down. There is not a huge window of time for the planning and

preparation that went into it between then and April. But finally, I'm glad I can talk about it because I wasn't

able to talk about it, actually. And don't worry, I'm going to get into it. I'm going to answer

all your questions, yada, yada, yada. But I was principally in Russia for Soventurn.

Now, Soventurn ended the whole event with all the itinerary and everything.

It ended Wednesday.

Okay.

And originally my plan was that I was going to stay from Wednesday till Monday to basically, you know, we had the EB there.

So the EB could meet together, hang out together, C. Jackson, you know, catch up, plan, we're in person.

Whenever we're in person, great things happen, you know, like ACP was expedited because we all met in person, you know, and our, the famous founding, the the golf course people think it's a golf course

it's not so we wanted it to be productive we also wanted you know jackson is my friend he's my

best friend i wanted to hang out with Jackson as well.

So did everyone else and get to know him.

And Jackson hasn't had a lot of time to meet the ACP leaders in person, actually.

I'm the only one who's had personal contact with Jackson.

So we wanted to stay a little extra until Monday

and then

and then

we basically decided

that we wanted to

just go from Moscow to New York

for the New York event.

Instead of me coming back home

and, you know,

then getting a plane ticket to New York,

we just will change our tickets

from Moscow to New York directly,

which we thought would have,

you know, would save us money,

it would save us yada, yada,

but also would make it impossible

for me to stream, right?

So, you know, I took a,

what should have been a week-long

hiatus, turned into a

two-week hiatus in terms of streaming.

And, uh, first thing i want to say is i'm extremely happy and i'm extremely impressed with the community in terms of how you've handled that

i'm really impressed i am so proud of this community i have to say that every time Every time I've been gone, every time I haven't streamed, you know, for a week or something,

there's always some crazy fucking bullshit that happens in the community, right?

But finally, I feel like this community is at the point where it's locked in.

You guys have an understanding that this is a fucking movement.

And it's like,

I am so proud

of what's been going on

in my absence.

Like, I don't want to get too much into it now, but we are planning.

There's a lot of plans that are in motion that are being implemented with the creation of our own media ecosystem for introductory educational content.

I'm seeing a video essay by one of the members of the community just go viral. The video essay initiative is taking off and launching. By the way,

RTSG is launching their own Friday. It's actually inspired me to get into making

an infrared vision video essay, which I think I could do based on the writing that I

did. Another thing I want to talk about.

It's inspiring me. I want to get back into the infrared vision videos,

right?

And the community just had the shit unlock.

You guys have been holding the line in the way that really reflects a movement, you know?

So I'm very proud of how you guys have been able to handle my absence first of all

that's the first time this has ever happened and we it's just like the thing that i've always

dreamed of is happening which is that this movement was always something exclusive.

I was never a mass streamer, public facing, outward facing for everyone.

I've never been that.

But the whole purpose of this cult was to cultivate leaders, discourse leaders, idea leaders, you know, influencers,

yada, yada, yada. And slowly but surely, you guys are being brought up and you're acquiring

personalities and faces of your own. And you're starting to actually tap into a mass appeal that only a movement could do collectively.

Not one person.

If I personally wanted to just go viral myself, I would have leapfrogged off of existing influencers and climb my way to the top, which is what

everyone does.

You make friends with existing streamer.

I didn't want to integrate into existing networks.

I wanted to help be part of the process where we're going to create our own network,

which is what we've actually been doing. We're creating our own media ecosystem and

influencer network, right, which is ours and ours alone. It's so fucking cool. It's actually

so fucking cool. It's actually so fucking cool.

It's like me, infrared,

Jackson, obviously, he's been

there from the start, but now we have

Midwestern marks, but now it's RTSG.

Now it's other video

essays. Now other people are rising

on X. I'm always seeing our people going viral independently

you guys are our influence is so immense and it's crazy like the whole discourse is bending

to us frankly easy what's up?

The new meme of like the Ivan Drago edits or whatever.

Like this is just infrared 2021 stuff, now getting mainstream appeal on the left.

And then meanwhile, you know,

it's straight up infrared 2021 aesthetic and vibe,

whatever you want to call it.

It's just like temperament, I guess,

attitude, sensibility, whatever you want to call it.

It's been taking off for the whole left.

You guys are really becoming a major influence on the left internationally.

I want you guys to know that this movement is

becoming a bulwark with respect to the new controversy with Hassan Piker

and the Democrats which I am going to get into in this stream

comprehensively acp is at the vanguard everyone understands intuitively everyone understands

amelia by the way i'm giving you an introduction to today's stream there were Everyone understands intuitively. Everyone understands. Amila.

By the way, I'm giving you an introduction to today's stream, the return stream.

Young Sovi, what's up?

Everyone, everyone understands that ACP is the alternative to Hassan Piker's strategy.

If there was no ACP, then the only strategy would be Hassan Pikers.

Frankly, I'm going to tell you that, frankly.

All these adventurous and radical ultras and stuff, they have no solutions.

We have an actual alternative strategy, and we're being recognized as such

sigma what's up oh you guys are lagging who's lagging ones if we're good

ones if we're good okay we're good i don't want to hear about nonsense anyway this is just an introduction by the way just an introduction and then um another another reason i decided to kind of give myself a vacation.

And I'm going to be honest, the second week that I was in Moscow after Soventurn was just

us enjoying Moscow

you know

sightseeing and

yeah every yeah

pretty much every night we're

having discussions and planning

and talking and stuff.

We're all together as leadership.

Tajini's what's up.

But in terms of like critical stuff, it was pretty relaxed.

And the reason I gave myself that vacation,

TIPO is, by the way, an unpaid vacation.

The reason I gave it to myself was because I decided to pat myself on the back a little bit, just a tiny bit.

Because I worked very hard, and Christian also worked very hard, in terms of getting it on the website, making

that response to Geese magazine. Originally I thought I would make a 10,000 word response and

from the plane from Detroit to Moscow, which was about a total of 24 hours or something, including the layover, I nonstop worked on that piece. I didn't eat at all. The Turkish Airlines, they serve you meals. I said, no, no thank you. I had my laptop out. I was just typing away.

I ended up producing about 18,000 words. And then from that to the release of the whole thing,

I would add on to it pretty much every day that I was in Moscow.

It got to a total of like 32, 33,000 words.

Just kind of like a mini book, right?

Orbital, what's up?

Small book length.

Peace.

And once I was like, you know what,

I'm going to take a break from the streaming a little bit.

I want people to actually, like, digest this and read it

and take it seriously and draw conclusions from it.

I am kind of not too surprised.

I'm a little disappointed by the fact that I don't

really feel like people are talking about

that work

or anything written in it

or the some of the ideas

it proposes or

the angle it's working with

but that's okay I don't I understand it's working with, but that's okay. I don't... I understand it's hard.

The attention span of this generation is just not

capable of synthesizing things directly from text, and I get that.

It has to be turned into like... That's why I want to use some of it as

a template for a video essay actually.

But

I think there are very

important

ideas expressed there, right?

Elite, what's up, bro? Thank you

so much. Appreciate you? Thank you so much. Appreciate you.

Thank you so much.

And regarding the geese people, I was glad to have been given the opportunity to write this, which I would have no other context to do.

Dark, what's up? The fact that I was able to pump out 30K words in a few days, one day really. Basically did

motivate me to just get back on finishing

that first book I want to get out,

which I'm going to do probably within the next

few months. It's not going to be hard.

I just have to balance the

manic writing style, which is Rise of maga communism, my substacks,

the geese magazine. That's kind of like my manic writing style. The book writings that I'm

working on, they're very much not manic, they're very much meticulous, they're very much, like,

crafty, They're very

well thought out. Every word I use is very

you know specific.

And

so I need to find a balance

between the two because one of them takes too long

and this one takes very quick, you know,

but it's just

the lucidity is not the best

for some people. It's very hard for them to get

it. I would say the most

important part

of communism in the

post-maga age, which is what it's called,

is when the iron became hot.

The most important chapter, by far, the iron became hot.

I'm probably going to make a video essay just based on that one alone.

And let me find the exact.

Yeah, it's number two.

Okay, O2.

So chapter two, the iron became hot.

It's the most important passage.

It's not even that long, actually.

But it is like critical.

I'm going to make a video essay using that as a template for sure

obviously chapter one is important i talk about the relationship between the offline the

online world the internet covid all these kind of different things uh Cybernetics, systems theory,

how that's basically become integrated

and a fundamental

fact of American collective

existence.

And

I want people to like understand,

synthesize why we have the memes that we do,

synthesize why I've been on this Metal Gear Solid type of shit,

synthesize why I've had this kind of like orientation

since summer of last year,

which is this like strong emphasis on how

we need to appropriate and replicate

the systemic logic of the U.S. military

and stuff like that.

This is a kind of very broad understanding

and cognitive mapping

of the history

of the post-war period, right?

And like explaining

this is our, the general theory theory and understanding it's almost like the one you saw in the communist manifesto it's kind of trying to give something a little close to that just where the fuck are we what is the the infrared vision? What is that?

How do we understand and explain

the narrative of like

you have the post-war period?

So how does

that culminate in Trump? How does that culminate

in the age we live in now, right?

The type of civilization

that is acquiring

supremacy today

or the civilizational dysfunction

that we're witnessing

and where we are,

where we're headed,

and so on and so on.

It's like, I want you guys to really think in terms of the origins of today really do lie in the collaboration of the military intelligence agencies.

And like, I think the strongest, if I have to like explain it to you, the strongest thesis in that passage, the iron became hot, is like, okay, what is the Marxist attitude to

conspiracy theories? Why have conspiracy theories proliferated as much as they do? The Epstein

files are central to our understanding of politics today. We have this whole thing, we call it

the Epstein class, the anti-E anti-epstein popular front like why is that

so fundamental well basically it's it's more or less because the real artificial intelligence

has been the creation of a system you call it a system but it's an autonomous self-reinforcing system right that military that that was designed in some sense and which has had inadvertent consequences

but the systemization of almost every aspect of civilization and society has created this perception

that there's people in command of the machine directly and it's not how it works

there is this autonomous machine in a sense it's in some sense it's autonomous which just

functions in a specific way that gives expression to the collective will in a certain way.

And that is what most people associate with the conspiratorial agenda.

But the truth is, is the opposite.

The real Epstein class is not planning society that comprehensively.

The Epstein class is actually a fetter on the proliferation of cybernetics

and the proliferation of this different way that control, the control of society is expressed.

You know, the Epstein class is not planning everything comprehensively.

They're not responsible for every meme and every trend and everything and so on and so on.

What's actually going on is that they are a fetter on the proliferation and development of the cybernetic era, so to speak, of the ability for human beings collectively to give expression, to give their will, to give their visions, their goals, their dreams, expression in a way that doesn't require the command of subjective institutions, you know, or personalities and so on and so on.

So there's a lot of depth there, and I want you guys to really let it marinate and take it seriously, you know?

I don't know.

I'm not really sure, and also I value your feedback, even if it's negative feedback, because I want to know how you guys react to this.

That's going to determine how I'm going to release and write the book, okay?

This is a writing that's 30,000 words long.

I'm not claiming it's a book.

I'm just saying it's pretty long, okay?

So I want you guys to really

give me feedback. If you think

it's bad, if you think it's just incomprehensible,

yada, yada, yada, just tell me,

and I'll adjust accordingly.

I feel like I've had no feedback on that.

I've had no feedback

on that writing, which is very discouraging. You guys keep

telling me to finish the book, do the book, do the book, write the book. How am I going to

write the book if I'm getting literally zero feedback on this? I feel like people just aren't even reading it, you know, which is what I predicted

would happen if I release the book and I focus all my energy on writing the book, right?

So please, you know, just if you want a book, if you want me to finish the book, not both the book and the other book that I want to write, you have to actually give me feedback on this. Okay?

So.

And yeah, the only feedback I've gotten is people talking about grammar and typos.

I don't give a fuck about that.

This isn't like a book.

This isn't a publication.

I don't care about typos.

I really don't.

Please shut the fuck up about grammar and typos.

If you understand what I'm trying to say, that's all it matters.

And one of the things I still remain...

I don't know what to call myself conservative about.

In the AI age, it is the need to cultivate the skill of writing and speaking without AI.

Because I think when you give AI language, when you give AI the dominion overwriting, you lose the very means of prompting AI in the first place.

And, you know, language is the house of being.

So maybe through AI we're going to find a new hieroglyphic kind of language.

Maybe I'm a reactionary, and I'm holding that back in some sense.

But I remain conservative when it comes to the written medium.

It's very important people are literate.

They know how to read.

They know how to write.

They don't let AI think for them.

AI is great when you have control over how it's prompted.

And you have an understanding about the relationship between words and images and senses and sensibilities, right?

A lot of the time, you don't even know what you want. The only way to really have a

active relationship between your desires, the things you want the only way to really have a really active relationship between your desires

the things you want to manifest and exist and the outcomes is through the written medium if you give

that to a i you know you're saying a i give me what i want right you give that to AI, you know, you're saying, AI, give me what I want, right?

You give that to AI, it's going to determine the content of what you want.

It's not simply going to give you what you wanted.

It's going to determine what you wanted.

And you're not going to have an active relationship to that at all. That's the problem.

So in any case, I just wanted to talk about that briefly. All right.

So that's the introduction part of my stream.

Now I'm going to get into it.

Soventurn.

Let's talk about Soventurn.

Okay.

So for those curious, I went to Russia in February to help plan Soventurn, to help give feedback for infrared to play a very active role in shaping Sovinturn and what it's supposed to be.

And then we had the conference in April with dozens and dozens of parties and I think it was 70 countries.

We had 200 representatives from 70 countries,

something like that. I don't remember.

A lot of people were there.

Very well put together event.

And you have a lot of questions, and i'm going to answer those right now

so the first question people ask

before i talk about the mission of sovereign turn and the vision and the idea

why was kpr f not there why is this not a

kprf initiative who are who is a just rush up so to my disappointment i don't know if i should say i'm

disappointed a lot of people, you know,

looked up a just Russia on Google, then looked at their Wikipedia, and Wikipedia calls them

Democratic Socialists and whatever. And so they just kind of went wild

drawing all these different conclusions about a just

Russia and what kind of people are in that party

and who they are.

Because Wikipedia classified them

on the politball political

LARP spectrum that apparently is

just how we understand politics.

So they're like, these are sock dems.

These are just like social Democrats.

And so, yeah, that was one of the very common responses to solve in turn, was that, why are you working with social Democrats and not the KPRF?

Is there a problem with KPR?

What's going on with KPRF?

Is something wrong?

Is there, okay, so I'm just going to talk about that, like, point

blank right now, okay? And I don't... If someone

asked me about it after this, I'm going to slap this shit out of them, like,

straight up. I don't give a fuck. Like, find a way to fucking tell people after I say this.

Because I keep getting asked. I keep seeing this question I know for a fact that 20 minutes from now in this very stream somebody's going to ask me

about it I just want you to know if you ask me about I'm going to slap the shit out of you if I see you

okay because I'm going to say it right now,

like, and I'm going to talk about it. I don't want to talk about it again.

All right? Why was KPRF not involved in this? This was specific. The idea for this came from

a just Russia people. That was their idea okay first of all it was their

idea the reason kpr f didn't join this conference was because elections in russia are coming up

because of just russia and kpr f are different parties I think they're part of different electoral blocks.

That may change. I don't know.

Elections are coming up, and I don't think KPRF wanted to send any kind of message that could undermine their electoral whatever like independence like they

maybe didn't want to um in a span of like one or two months which is the window between like

the planning and the execution,

they need more time to be brought in, basically,

because this was the initiative led by Adjust Russia.

Now, why wasn't it led by KPRF? Because KPRF is already in Solidnet.

So KPRF doesn't find it urgent, urgently necessary to form a new international because

they're already part of one.

Now, does that, that being said, is KPRF closed to the idea necessarily of having a new at international

that's doubtful consider and i could just tell you there's many people in the kpr f who would love

for sovereign to be, you know, a thing that's a collaboration between a Just Russia and KPRF.

But because KPRF's already in SolidNet, there's not an urgency to form a new international. But look at how SolidNet is structured,

how the Greeks control it, how the Greeks meddle and interfere in everyone's affairs, the KKE.

You know, right now, it's not looking good. Solid Net's not looking good. It's not vital good it's not vital it's not fresh it's not

young kprrf is a party of its word it made an obligation it's it's signed you know the founding

um documents it's renewed its membership into solid nets founding documents.

It's renewed its membership

into SolidNet. So the KPRF has

obligations with respect

to SolidNet. So they're not just

going to overnight join something completely

new. It's

going to take more time, for sure. And so it has nothing to do with any

kind of political difference between a just Russia and the KPRF with respect to domestic

Russian politics. It's completely

immaterial and irrelevant to

why Sovereign

is being led by a just Russia.

It's just absolutely immaterial.

Okay? So once

if I've answered that question,

there's no beef between KPRF and just Russia when it comes to this.

There's no rivalry or conflict at all.

When it comes to this, there's none at all.

There's no animosity.

There's no hostility.

There's no issue here.

This initiative was led by a just Russia.

Why was it led by a just Russia?

Actually, there's another reason I forgot to mention.

A just Russia's leader has pretty extensive relations

with many socialist governments around the world

they're not constrained by Solidnet

they're not constrained by a specific

terms and conditions of association

with international social socialist and communist governments and parties and organizations.

So there's that aspect as well.

But we absolutely plan on the invitation by the way

was extended to the KPRF it's just that it was too

short of a notice

it was like too short of a notice

yes the KPRF was invited

they're still invited the invitation remains open

there's no there's and when the K when or if the was invited, they're still invited. The invitation remains open.

And when the KPRF joins Soventurn, all the people who are

trying to spin this narrative of a conflict

between the KPRF and adjust Russia

on this issue will look very

stupid.

This is just a matter of timing and who proposed the initiative.

That's all. That's literally it.

So, I hope that clarifies that answer comprehensively.

Our relations with the KPRF are they're as good as ever,

but the KPRF is a member of SolidNet.

And SolidNet is not just the KPRF.

KPRF is working within Solidnet to advance

a specific

perspective, which

does not have the same freedom

within SolidNet

that it is able to have within

So it's the same perspective as the KPRF.

There's no ideological difference at all, right?

Okay, so what is Soventurn?

Soventurn... Soventurn...

Soventurn is a unique international

because it's not simply a socialist international.

Soventurn is an international

that is specifically based on instead of simply socialism or simply communism

uniting everyone it's specifically based on an understanding that the soviet union was not just a

country it was a country for sure but it was not just a country. It was a country for sure, but it wasn't just a country. The Soviet Union is this kind of

civilizational, or I should rather say, political, economic paradigm that has outlived the Soviet Union itself in the form of contemporary socialist governments

that are in many ways the inheritance of the Soviet Union. It's especially true in Latin America,

Cuba and so on and so on, Vietnam. It's also true for China to a great extent.

Then you also have the fact that the Soviet Union was a completely alternative paradigm of history and global development and politics and so on and so on.

So there's this kind of understanding of PaxSovietica, right?

That it's something more than just a country.

It's also a principle. It represents an alternative principle,

an alternative poll in a way. And Sovereign Turn is committed to developing that and

advancing that and exploring that more. So that's the

main thing in Sovereignty.

It's not simply about history.

It's not simply about honoring history and

being a historical heritage kind of

thing.

It's more like a specific

reflection on the history

of the U.S.S.S.R.

Or I should say the post-Soviet period.

And how we

can or should respond to that.

So I So, So, the thing with

the thing with Soventurn is that in a socialist international, it's not clear what relationship that has to the actually existing socialism in the 20th century.

Pretending like this didn't already happen, right? It's a farce. It's a farcical mockery of history, and it's a mockery of socialism itself.

So Sovereign turn is attempting to take the Soviet Union from simply just a country, just another country, right?

And turn that into its own autonomous moral principle that is capable of guiding in some sense, providing some kind of influence and inspiration and so on and so on to all the peoples of the world.

And you may not understand what I'm talking about specifically here. but understand something the Soviet Union was not simply Russia.

It wasn't simply this or that nation or this or that civilization.

It represented, and this was rooted in the idea of the new Soviet man when you think about it, right?

The creation of a completely new,

almost from scratch,

ex nihilo, civilization.

In some sense,

the Soviet Union is like a contemporary Rome, right? The Rome of the modern era. Because Rome, in the same way Rome represents

this kind of autonomous and abstract principle of the universal law of the Republic, right,

devoid of any specific parochial instantiation, devoid of any, sorry, rootedness in a specific parochial instantiation, right?

So the Soviet Union was something similar.

And how do we isolate

Sovietism and the Soviet aspect?

Not necessarily isolate, but identify that as an

independent principle, something that has

universal relevance and significance so that specific reflection and understanding of the soviet

era and

Sovietism is I think it's what

makes Sovereign turn unique. Because

there are a lot of post-Soviet narratives

which attempt to say the Soviet Union

was simply Russia. The Soviet Union

was simply

Eurasia. And all those things are not necessarily wrong.

But this is looking at it from a different angle.

It's understanding the universal significance of the Soviet Union, right?

There was a problem in the Soviet period.

The Chinese will attest to this the most, probably,

which is that the Soviet Union attempted to kind of enforce and exert a specific kind of doctrinal

orthodoxy

upon socialism worldwide,

upon Marxism, Leninism, and

communism worldwide, right?

It represented this kind of rigid

universalism in some sense within the context of the international communist movement You know, I feel you guys are fucking bored of this.

I'm just going to be honest.

Like, I get talk about this in a lot of depth, but it's just like, I don't know.

I feel like I should move on and talk about asan piker right uh yeah

so i feel like nobody gives a fuck honestly like really so savin turn is the new international that the acP is a part of. The American Communist Party is part of Soventurn. And it's, we're just in the beginning stages. We just had our first conference. There's going to be many more that come from this. Many parties are going to join including some that may

surprise you very strong and powerful ones kilotti what's up appreciate you man appreciate you with the

five what's up, man? But, uh, so...

I feel like I've addressed and answered most of the important questions on this.

Just know that it's very promising, and there's a lot in the works, a lot can come from this and it's specifically

committed to the creation of an international community dedicated to bringing the values of 20th century communism and Soviet civilization into the 21st century,

led by a new generation. There's very much an openness to the freshness, the youthfulness of the new generation, social media and so on and so on.

So that's the thing you should understand the most here. Okay.

Look exhausted.

Well, I've been traveling for days, and I, you know, I haven't had a lot of rest, but whatever.

Can you yap a little about the people you met at Soventure?

Well, Fidel's grandson was there.

That was very cool.

The Sandinistas were there. That was also very cool. There Sandinistas were there.

That was also very cool.

There was a lot of interesting, cool people that were there.

I don't know, like, is that all you care about is, like, celebrity meetups or something?

Do you not care about the principles?

You not care about the principles? You not care about the idea.

I feel like people don't, you know?

It's sad, but it's just, it is what it is. i feel like i i'm exhausted of is people using civilization in ways that are so presumptuous

like every civilization's particular

we have

you know

Russian civilization

Chinese civilization,

you know, basically Dugan's understanding

a multipolarity,

Zhang Wei Wei's idea of civilization states

and so on and so on. Everyone understands

distinct particular civilizations, right?

That are concrete.

And then the most common question I always get asked is,

what about American civilization?

I'm really bored of it because I've written a lot about it and read America.

So have others.

I've talked a lot about it,

but everyone has amnesia and fucking forgets and nobody I love seeing people just like

actually like when they do agree with me when I say this shit like they're able to like

continue communicating it so they don't have to constantly repeat myself over and over again

but um so they don't have to constantly repeat myself over and over again.

But, you know, the important thing to understand is that every civilization, for it to be particular, has to have a relationship to a universal principle of some kind.

And only by having this relationship to the universal principle, does its concrete particularity take form? Okay. So in relation to the content, in some sense,

of something universal, does the concreteness via form acquire the determination that we associate

with the word concrete.

So, to put it simply, for a concrete civilization and concrete form of history to exist, China, Russia, America, whatever the fuck you want,

it can only do so by way of reference to a universal principle of some kind, unconditionally universal principle.

And the idea of Sovereign turn is understanding the Soviet Union as a specific articulation of that principle instead of simply tethering the soviet union to russia and other other other constituent

republics we the idea

is that the Soviet Union

can also have this

dimension of being a universal principle

I find that extremely

fucking interesting I personally find

that very interesting

other people don't find it interesting.

It's because you're fucking retarded and you're porn addicted and you eat Cheetos all day and you play video games and you're worthless.

So I find it really fucking cool and interesting.

I find it really like, I find it really, uh,

fascinating. Like,

it's a fascinating narrative. It's a fascinating way of interpreting the post-Soviet world that we live in, right? How our way of understanding the post-Soviet world and the failure in some sense of the Soviet Union in terms of like the ability for it to continue existing formally as a state,

Russia cannot simply become the Soviet Union again, right?

So where is the Soviet Union and what is the Soviet Union?

Well, instead of reducing it to a specific and particular civilization, let's try to

articulate, let's try to concede how it articulated a universal principle.

And for that precise reason, could not continue existing in the form of a country

but but we can we can decentralize that principle we can acquire we can hold it in the palm of our hands

and in this country in america we can be Soviet. And all peoples of the world can be Soviet. And they can

behold the principle that we call Soviet and apply that to their own country and their own reality.

And for those that say, no, instead of simply being the Soviet Union, we should tap into our own local and whatever.

Yes, we know.

But there's a reason people in China all started crying when the Soviet Union dissolved,

despite the fact that China and the Soviet Union were at odds and were in a state of conflict with each other.

Because they understood there was an irreducible, universal element of Soviet civilization

that even China took for granted, and may even still take for granted to this day.

It was an alternative modernity, and that deserves more consideration. Holy shit, third observer.

Thank you, man.

I appreciate you.

Thank you so much.

Appreciate you, brother.

Holy fuck with the 50.

But I concede people don't find this topic interesting.

And that's okay all right well let's talk about about Hassan Piker? So I don't know, while I was gone,

Hassan Piker has been acquiring prominence

because he's been going viral.

He's been going viral, you know, campaigning for Democrats and telling people to vote Democrat.

And, you know, my first reaction

is that it generated a discourse of course

generated a discourse where people

are arguing about whether we should vote

Democrats or not in 2026

we're still having this argument

but I'm going to be contrarian and I'm going in 2026, we're still having this argument.

But I'm going to be contrarian, and I'm going to be a little different, because I don't like retards on any side of the debate.

And you know what? You know why we're stuck in this fucking argument this endless stupid fucking argument

about why we should vote democrats the when infrared launched in 2020 2021 that was a central

argument it was a central argument in 2016 it was a central argument in 2020 it was a central argument in 2016.

It was a central argument in 2020.

It was a central argument in 2020.

Not so much 2024 because the Gaza genocide had, most leftists were shut the fuck up because of that.

Like, you don't even dare

try to make these like vosh tier

arguments about Democrats

but we're back with the same discourse

but

who should you

fucking blame for this discourse?

Should you blame Hassan Biker for it?

Should you blame the liberals and the liberal opportunists?

Should you blame the people who are materially supported by Democrats?

Should you blame

Kat Abu Ghazala and should you blame

the discursive partisans of Democrat

electoral loyalty

on the left?

No, blame the people on our fucking side who don't know how to actually fucking understand

the problem with this. Blame our own side. Blame the people, blame the leftists who understand

that this is wrong, but

have fundamentally failed

in terms of

articulating

a proper

counter argument.

You know what? I'm exhausted. I'm not exhausted when I see Hassan Piker advocate the same things

he always has. I'm not exhausted when I see bread tube and I'm not exhausted it because it's

predictable. I'm exhausted when the people on

our side don't know how to respond

to it and respond in retarded

fucking ways.

That's what exhausts me.

How can we

avoid the trap

of becoming an appendage of the Democratic Party without becoming retarded

cults and sects who have no connection to any objective type of politics and simply reduce politics to the whims and fancies of our ideologies and our consciousness.

It's like there's these two extremes.

Retard LARP and conformity to the Democrat hegemony.

There's like these two extremes,

which is this subjectivist understanding of politics,

which says politics should directly conform to our principles directly in the sense that it should be what we want it to be rather than what it actually fucking is versus the opposite end which i think hasan pikeur very predictably expresses, although I'm going to talk about that, because there's so many contradictions and nuances I feel like people miss when it comes to this, which are crucial to understand, which is like, well, no, let's be realistic. Be realistic and vote Democrat.

Well, I am a realist. First of all, I'm not saying we can simply have the politics that directly reflects some ideological form and just be that directly.

I don't think that at all.

I do understand there's an objective reality of politics, not reducible to our ideologies and subjectivities, including our moral sensibilities, including our moral sensibilities.

I do think that the moral dimension of politics is indirect, it's not direct. Same thing with

ideological and principle and so on and so on.

So I absolutely agree.

If you don't have a proper strategy, a proper solution to the duopoly, you're just as much culpable

as the opportunist shills of the duopoly.

Caleb Mopin and CPI, don't vote Democrat.

There's plenty of retarded third, there's plenty of retarded manifestations of third party sentiment, which I want nothing to do with.

So strap in and very meticulously pay attention to what I'm about to say here. You know, Thank you. Yo, you know, Yo.

One of you can hear me.

All right.

Okay. Okay. all right so um i want you to understand that in the dimension of politics and in history at

large there are objective contradictions that are not reducible to the contradiction between our understanding of the correct line and the reality so let me give you the reality that's objective there is a contradiction going on within the Democratic Party of some kind

and I'm

really starting to notice it now

in ways that

we're not manifest before

but are actively being drawn

out

we can talk about how much Hassan Piker manifest before, but are actively being drawn out.

We can talk about how much Hassan Piker has been given a free pass and how easy he's had it.

How easy he had it, right?

He's been given puff pieces, but it's he had friends he was networking in all these different ways uh progressives could get away with sliding under the radar and

without controversy without provoking controversy, you know,

smuggle in leftist ideas within the liberal hegemony without causing too much controversy.

But, you know, this era is coming to an end.

So leftists were playing the game of the kind of

long march through the institutions i think for at least since 2016 right that's coming to an end now

and now a decisive line is being drawn, thanks to the acceleration of the post-October 7th, you know, Zionist, anti-Zionist axis of polarization that's taken the country, where now prominent establishment media is being divided between those who basically there's a drew Pavluization going on.

All the major liberal media think the honeymoon era of leftism being tolerated by the mainstream

is rapidly coming to an end and now there's a drew pavluisization that's going on even in mainstream liberal media let's call it what it is it's drew

pavluization okay where the combination of silicon valley going more rightward which has happened since

twenty twenty four i mean earlier frankly much earlier but it's been made more right word, which has happened since 2024, I mean, earlier,

frankly, much earlier,

but it's been made explicit since 2024.

The combination between

Silicon Valley acquiring more discursive

prominence and

that retarded

Claire,

whatever the fuck her name is from Quillette,

you know, those types.

There's a specific convergence between...

I'm a liberal, I'm a progressive,

but, you know,

this specific type of left leftism goes too far i'm in abundance as recline liberal i think that the pro russiaussia, pro-China

stuff is abominable.

The communism stuff is

honestly, you consult the economic experts

and what we really need is to have an

economy founded upon child

rape, endless rape and

child rape of auster rape and child rape,

of austerity, neoliberal, technocrat,

abundance, Ezra Klein,

confronting Putin's authorities.

I don't know.

Do you understand what I'm fucking talking about?

It's like...

Liberals have kind of been getting cucked

since the Bernie era.

Master what's... I'm going to explain what's happened.

Fuck, you guys need to hear this.

And holy shit, put your thinking caps on.

And like, actually listen, because it's important you have the discernment.

You have the intelligence.

You know what intelligence is?

It's the ability to render things intelligible.

Instead of just shitting and spamming

the correct line

and, well, instead of

just shitting out, calling

Hassan Piker a retard.

I want you to actually have a correct analysis of what's been happening up into this point.

Okay.

In 2016, Donald Trump won.

In 2016, Donald Trump won.

Whoa, right?

Crazy.

Do you know that?

Once if you remember that.

Once if you know Trump won in 2016.

Anyway, when Trump won in 2016, it set the neoliberal establishment in the media awry.

Okay, there was a huge assault on him from the neoliberal media establishment.

There was panic.

Yeah, very much, very much.

Russiagate and all this shit.

Like, he was regarded as an enemy of the

fourth estate, whatever you want to call it,

a threat to democracy.

By democracy, we of course are

referring to

neoliberal institutional hegemony.

Anyway, Trump politically, very quickly, you know, ceased to be any kind of threat to such, you know, he recruited the neocons, some of the more wacky extreme wings of the neoliberal hegemony.

And so politically, he put off anything. extreme wings of the neoliberal hegemony.

And so politically, he put off any threat that he would be a political problem.

But nonetheless, Trump represented a crisis for neoliberal society.

Maga represented... I talk, I write about this.

Like,

he was, the primary contradiction was MAGA, the loss

of the trust in the institutions.

Do you understand

what I'm talking about? When Trump was

elected in twenty sixteen

the liberal establishment if you can call them that neoliberal establishment the technocrats whatever

they regarded the popular mistrust and loss of faith in institutions as a major crisis. They associated it with foreign

adversaries, with domestic terrorism or something, but they saw it as a major threat to the system,

to the hegemony.

And this is a fact.

So that was the main focus was combating that, combating MAGA,

combating the post-Trump era, you know, rogue type of sovereignty that I talk about in the rise of MAGA communism.

Rogue forms of popular sovereignty taking shape. Rogue cybernetic forms of popular sovereignty taking shape rogue cybernetic

forms of popular sovereignty

rogue AIs on the loose

A by the way

If you don't know what that means

Popular sovereignty is itself

A form of artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence is simply fucking robots who can think and talk and stuff.

And artificial intelligence is a specific artificial...

Um...

Uh, artificial...

Artificial... An artificial function of intelligence, meaning the ability for something outside of our minds to discriminate and render reality intelligible in some kind of way.

And collective principles and collective systems

collectively created systems and forms of popular sovereignty are themselves

artificial forms of intelligence they render reality discriminate and

intelligible in specific ways they bend it and intelligible in specific ways.

They bend it and shape it

in different ways.

This comes from Reza Nagaristani

in some way.

Intelligence and spirit.

He writes it in that book

that the ultimate form

of artificial intelligence

is communism itself,

right?

The riddle of history solved. Anyway, I don't want to give you a crash course on this show oh wow

don't overthink it all right it's super simple anyway um so it's like artificial intelligence gone rogue and gone wrong, right?

So there was a primary contradiction at hand.

That's all you have to keep in mind and remember.

And that gave the left a lot of wiggle room a lot of wiggle room to basically get a platform by the neoliberal hegemony and mainstream institutions.

So, it starts with Destiny.

From Destiny, Hassan Piker gets a platform.

Do you understand the analogy?

In gaming companies even, I know there was GamerGate before,

but in all types of media

institutions

academia, whatever you want

leftists

were given a platform by virtue

of being part of this like anti-Maga

popular front

it's almost like it was this mockery of the

historical anti-fascist popular front

where it was led by the fascist hegemony

itself and leftist played second fiddle

but in any case most of these glasses wearing to Gemini itself and leftist played second fiddle.

But in any case, most of these glasses wearing neoliberal

technocrat types were completely

oblivious and clueless about

leftism. They didn't

really, I mean, when they were

told Marxism is simply workers ownership of the means of production and all the breadtube spiel, so to speak, of course, there's British MI6 agents who will warm their hearts to that. Oh, it's just democracy applied to the workplace. Oh, yeah,

that's the... Yes, this is like

the intelligentsia warming up to

something that ultimately condemns them to be

in mass graves. Okay?

Tale is oldest

time. It happened also,

by the way, in the post-war period when the intelligentsia sympathized with Stalin, and then they learned about the gulags, and then they were horrified, and were hungry in 56 or something, right?

Nothing new under the sun there, but a new, like, incarnation of that happened after 2016,

where, like, basically liberals were tricked by leftists into platforming and tolerating, if not

adopting, I would say tolerating mainly.

You know, leftist ideas

as okay, as innocuous, as,

well, this is just like, you know,

pro-democracy ideas.

And MAGA is the main threat.

Trump is the main threat. So that's basically what you had post-2016.

Leftists were given a platform by new liberal institutions.

Hassan Piker's career trajectory mirrors this because you started with Destiny, who I guess one-for-one represents trust the science, trust the institutions, type of politics.

And Hassan Piker got a platform

from Destiny

and you know

the rest is history but that's

basically an analogy for what I'm talking about

okay

so but there's always been a strand of leftism that is not necessarily liberal.

It's kind of, in a sense, fundamentally illiberal.

And actually, infrared is the one that really drew this strand out and really drew the line and said, okay, you know what?

Liberals, go fuck yourselves, you know?

Now you see Hassan Piker giving speeches at Yale talking about how the Soviet Union was good and we need a proletarian dictatorship

to the shock of liberals actually but that's part of the strand an illiberal strand it's

very it's it's an illiberal strand that exists in leftism okay so uh i hope you guys

are following me here you understand what i'm saying it's not too confusing it's not too

overwhelming to you ones if you're following so far.

Okay, good. I'm glad. There was always a difference between that.

There's always been a difference between Asan Piker and Destiny.

That's what I'm trying to say.

The difference is from 2016 up until this point,

leftism was given a platform and was allowed to blend in with liberals.

And nobody really cared or it's not because,

it's not because Asan is a CIA agent.

I don't think he is.

I actually think he does this because he believes it.

You could say he's motivated personally,

and be cynical, and say he just wants the connections and power.

I don't know, actually, because his uncle,

Jenk, has a very different attitude. And family, I think, speaks volumes. So I don't know. I think he

genuinely rationalizes and believes this is the best strategy.

And that's why in good faith, I'd like to respond to Hassan Piker.

I don't want to talk about... I don't want to say that it's all based on personal motivations of greed and so on i don't want to be angry at him

i don't want to cancel him i want to rationally confront and rationally respond to his line of argumentation and his

justification and his reasoning. I think that's more important to do. I'm too old. I'm turning 30 this year. I don't have time to

take such things personally and be angry about them.

I know a lot of you guys want me to be angry. You like when I yell and you like when I get

angry, but I did that already

when it came to bread tube and shit. Why would I want to keep doing this? Instead, I want to

speak clearly with lucidity and offer... Just be fucking clear about it, right?

So, in any case,

that specific honeymoon

between leftism and neoliberalism started coming to an end because of October 7th.

And that's when neoliberals, if you, whatever you want to call them,

they started acquiring distinction.

They started putting their foot down and saying,

you know what? I'm against Trump

and MAGA and all, and I'm totally

on board with the anti-unquote

anti-fascism.

But I'm noticing

a lot of these leftists.

They support Bashar al-Assad.

That was the first thing, the witch hunt against

tankies. Asan Piker

avoided that witch hunt.

But then no later,

it was,

what about Putin and China

and the Uyghur camps

and this is like when infrared started out, right?

Then in 22, the SMO, obviously game changer, Russia.

It's like there's this gradual process where neoliberal started to realize that, you know, actually leftists aren't the same as we progressive Democrats.

There's something illiberal about leftism. There's something about it that's like totally rogue,

and it's actually similar to MAGA. It's a rogue AI. So they started treating leftism as a rogue

AI in the same way they treat MAGA as a rogue AI. Okay?

They started understanding and comprehending that the left wing is not the same thing as the neoliberal hegemony.

That the left wing did some kind of tiki, okay, transgender rights and LGBT, progressivism, to blend in with the neoliberal establishment.

But there was something there that was fundamentally incompatible with it.

And illiberal.

And malign

malign

AI

distinct

different

right

and

now

I'm starting to see

mainstream liberal media I can't cite them think pieces now I'm starting to see mainstream

liberal media. I can't cite them. Think pieces and hit pieces on Hassan

Piker. They're going, look, I'm a progressive, I support socialism, I love Bernie

Sanders, I'm a big fan of incremental

health care reform. I don't know what these people

believe. I don't disagree

with the view that Nanyahu

needs to be held accountable for the excesses.

But we should,

in the same way we condemn Nick Fuentes, let's condemn Hassan

Piker. He's also an extremist. He's also in a liberal extremist. He does apologia for the Soviet Union.

He does apology for terrorism for October 7th.

He's anti-Zionism creeps on the border of anti-Semitism.

His conflict with Ethan Klein was a foreshadow of this fact.

But up until this point, the conflict with Ethan Klein did not get to the institutional level. Hassan

Piker thought he had successfully marginalized Ethan Klein as a right winger or something,

and this is how he understood his own victory, his of this victory right it's not true though now now more than ever we're getting to the point where because hasan piker is associating himself with democrats so prolifically and so actively you'd think they would just reward him and say,

okay, we love you, Hassan Piker, for being a Democrat chill. That's not what's happening. I want you to

be very, very discerning about the dynamic going on. What's happening is that the platforming of Hassan Piker by Democrat politicians is starting

discourses and it's initiating conversations within the Democratic Party hegemony of like,

um, do we really want this guy around us?

And like, there's a debate that it's starting.

And the pro-Hassan wing of that debate is not very strong within the Democratic Party.

It's not very prominent.

So he's being subjected to hit pieces,

and there's like a conflict going on in there,

where, like, the ultra-pro-Zionist Democrats,

of course, coupled with the Republicans and the APAC and whatever, but also within the Democratic Party, are starting to really hone in on Hassan Piker as being this, you know, representing this like rogue

illiberal

leftist AI

and almost like they see him as MAGA

what they used to see

as MAGA right?

And he's dangerous and so on and so on

yada yada yada and i want you to be intelligent in

and understanding these contradictions because let's have an intelligent response to hasan

pike or let's not have a stupid one um if as son piker um if asan piker in his mind in his own mind if he stopped campaigning with these democrats you know what's her name uh cori bush and whatever

abdul said like if he wasn't doing this and if he was just uh not being involved.

In his mind, he would not...

I'm being very good faith, by the way, assuming this is his strategy.

Right?

He wouldn't be accelerating that contradiction.

The contradiction itself is very powerful you know because we at the ace we the acp do this same fucking thing not with the democrats not with the

republicans we do the same thing.

We accelerate contradictions. We know how it works.

If you're a marginal voice, then nobody cares what you say.

But if you're a voice who's being legitimated by mainstream politicians and mainstream media,

and you're being accepted and you're not being canceled, and you're defending the Soviet Union,

and you're advocating against NATO, and you're advocating against NATO and you're defending China

and you're advocating

the dissolution of Israel as a state

you are going to ruffle

some fucking feathers. That's

how it works. That's how

it works.

I want you guys to understand that that is how it works when you

when you're cancelled

it doesn't matter what you fucking believe

it does it does,

obviously for the purposes

and from the perspective of

an alternative strategy,

but from the perspective of the logic

of the hegemony, when it,

when you're legitimated by it in some sense,

you know, and then you start being problematic, you can accelerate and accentuate contradictions.

An example of this is Trump himself.

Did Trump run as a third party in 2016?

No, he ran as a Republican.

Had Trump not been president at the Republican debates in 2015, would anyone have given a fuck about him?

Think of this is, I want you to understand where Hassan's coming from before you attack him so we can correctly have a response.

Do you understand?

Like, somehow the only way to be, to participate in objective politics rather than your own subjective politics is by articulating and responding to the contradictions that do exist objectively there, not internally subjectively here, between what you want and what you wish and versus reality.

Whoever's waging a war between their wishes and reality is waging a vain war they've already lost.

It's not interesting and it goes nowhere.

But when you can correctly tap into objective contradictions within the system itself

and provoke the system to have an internal confrontation with itself, suddenly you're

dealing with a situation where you can accelerate the systemic dysfunction of the hegemony.

You can accelerate the various dysfunctional ways by which it acquires self-relation.

You can disrupt its ability to reproduce itself discursively and culturally as it gives way to the material contradictions that underlie it you can provoke such things

and it's the duty of marxists to provoke such things not simply excise themselves from politics in the name of moral purity.

I'm not saying Hassan's doing this correctly.

I'm just telling you the specific response to Hassan on the grounds of, okay, well, let's just disinvest and create our own reality that conforms fully with what we want in our heads.

That's a road to nowhere, frankly. frankly so that's the first thing i want to say okay okay now why does how and why does asan get this wrong well it's very simple i think hasan

piker fears that if he steps down from where he is, he's going to lose the mantle of being the preeminent influencer of American leftism. Someone else will take his place. And that's what he's scared of and it's an insecurity i don't understand

at all hasan piker needs to understand that the illiberal rogue a i that we call leftism right

which he is the face of in america

that doesn't have

an institutional basis

it's almost as if instead of punishing Hassan maybe we should maybe we should encourage him to just have the self-confidence to understand that that specific niche being occupied is empty.

If you cease to occupy it, it will simply not exist.

Whereas, for example, if you cease to occupy the throne of progressive neoliberalism,

of course someone else will take your place. Why? Because there is an institutional gravity.

There's an institutional incentive

for that throne to be

occupied because it's

there's like a material cause

for it. It's like it's there

because it needs to be there

according to the logic of our institutions. But that's not true for the leftism that defends the Soviet Union. That's not true for the leftism that does assert a red line with the liberals and the neoliberals

you know the Ivan Drago edit

that's our shit

they don't have the Ivan Drago edit

we're the ones that are saying

hey fuck you

we're taking this shit

we're not negotiating with you we're seizing the means of Hey, fuck you. We're taking this shit.

We're not negotiating with you.

We're seizing the means of production.

We're building the proletarian dictatorship. We don't give a fuck about your fucking Ezra Klein, abundance, fucking gay bullshit.

We don't give a Soviet, economists and experts up your fucking ass.

We are building the Soviet Union 2.0.

It will be authoritarian.

We're going to throw the fucking scientists who disagree with us

in a ditch

and crush them with an iron

fist. Like Ivan

Drago. That's the fucking energy that we're

on.

To calm down.

Milo at the 25, thank you.

Okay, do you understand, though?

Do you understand what I'm talking about?

Like in Stranger Things, season 3,

that fucking Soviet general

who just picked up a lap-coded scientist and started choking him like Darth Vader.

That's the type of shit we're on.

We're not here to negotiate with nerds.

We're not here to negotiate with the shills of the institutions

and of the hegemony. That's not why

we're here. There is something

illiberal, rogue,

malign, dark about real

left-wing politics.

And let's fucking embrace it

instead of doing Takea

and blending in with liberals.

That's all I'm fucking saying.

And is it wrong to say it?

No, it's correct.

It's what Infrared has been saying

since day one and we've been ahead of the curb we've been

ahead of the curb every step of the way maybe it was impossible for hasan Piker to do that.

Maybe it was impossible.

Although I disagree. I actually disagree with that.

I disagree it would have been impossible.

I think he should have been impossible.

I think he should have the self-confidence to understand that if he, if Hassan Piker breaks with the Democratic Party, that in and of itself will induce that will induce an objective change i mean that by the way i'm very deadly serious about that if hasan piker went rogue ditched the democratic party entirely

and fully went rogue, okay, fully went dark, right?

It would cause immense turmoil and chaos and so on.

I agree but he would not lose the power

he would actually become more powerful

there's no one

there's no other

like what is he scared of is you scared of

Ethan Klein and destiny what pull do they have you know there's a reason

jenk his uncle went down the path that he did too little too late by the way

although Anna Kasparian is kind of good at it.

Because we are in the age of MAGA. This is a post-Maga age. And it's a cybernetic popular sovereignty. It's all that fucking matters.

Instead of institutional accreditation and legitimation.

Institutional legitimation doesn't mean

anything. That's Epstein

Harvey Weinstein

style of

discourse and politics, where there's an

insider who's powerful and you have to get

their approval.

You don't need that anymore.

If you go rogue, you break with the hegemony, you break with the Democratic Party,

you just walk with your fucking nuts hanging, basically,

as long as you can have a base, as long as you have the people in some naive sense they will carry you all the way fucking through you will be crowd surfing all the way through

you don't need the democratic party you don't need the new york

times you don't need institutional accredation you should join the dark side and be in this basket of deplorables with everyone else.

Yes, including Jake Shields and Dan Bolzerian and all these other people.

You can disagree with them.

I disagree with them on plenty.

I disagree with Hassan Pike or probably on plenty. You can still retain your

attitude on trans, whatever. It doesn't matter. All that matters is you break with the hegemony

and you join the underground, you join the dark side. And it's not a unified politics I'm talking about. I'm just talking about this wild space that exists outside of the institutions. And it's very possible to be there. It's very possible for someone like Piker to thrive there, I think, actually.

It's very possible.

And I think he thinks that if he does that, he's going to become irrelevant and marginal and, you know, unimportant and so on.

But you need to understand that it's the mainstream media and it's the hegemony that's becoming

unimportant and irrelevant and this is this you should understand what's been going on for the

past two decades maybe let's say one decade right What's going on for the past decade is that

mainstream neoliberal institutions have increasingly had to acquiesce to this new cybernetic form

of the general will that is wild and rogue and it's also what has provoked the drew pavluization of the liberal left because I mean the way it all fits together is

very simple actually

you know

the more that they began to understand.

It's almost like I always dreamed of a, of a, I wanted, you know who I wanted to lead maga communism before I even had a word for maga communism?

I'm going to tell you some some i used to follow streamer politics

as a as a schizophrenic marxist esoteric marxist who had no illusions about how retarded and shallow it was

i understood it also reflected

objective tendencies within American politics. And so, like, I followed the destiny

Hassan drama. I remember it in 2020. I thought there was an opening there for something very, very interesting, which is destiny started to identify in Hassan Piker, a rogue, malign, AI, just like Mago, right?

There's something dangerous and dark about this leftism.

And so my thoughts were, okay, Hassan's reaction was very defensive.

Hassan said, no, I want to fight for the hill of libtartism destiny you're the dark

right wing one and i'm just the regular liberal i'm the normal liberal and i don't have this

darkness the dark side right and he won by the way successfully he won that that battle he was able to

create a kind of situation where he would associate destiny with the reaction, the MAGA reaction to, or the MAGA opposition, I should say, to progressivism.

And this provoked a lot of resentment and hatred on the side of the neoliberals and so on.

But it also provoked upon, I'm not, fuck, the way my brain works is that like, sometimes things that are happening in parallel, I just lump it in with that and say, oh, this is the cause of it. Of course, the streamer drama is not

the cause of this profound process that I'm

talking about.

You know, the parallels

like Bernie Sanders versus

Democratic Party, mainstream politics, all this

kind of stuff. Like, there is a specific dynamic

that

was provoked,

where a critical type of self-reflection

on the part of the neoliberal kind of hegemonic ideologists occurred

that culminates in Drew Pavluization, where they're like look although we are distinct from maga and trump we also have to recognize that leftism also becomes extreme and too far and the horseshoe theory basically, right? It has these illiberal Nossbol tendencies.

So we need to kind of buckle down and in order to effectively combat Trumpism and MAGA, we have to excise ourselves of leftism.

But in the process of excising of leftism, you can appear similar to the right wing, and you can appear similar to MAGA, because, you know, a lot of the justification

on the part of MAGA and the Republicans is contrasting themselves to the so-called radical

left extremists, right? So, but the maneuver is very interesting because the hegemony's ideology is going to directly be something that looks like Destiny's politics in 2020, 2021, right?

It's now, it's now finally taking shape, right? It's now

finally taking shape,

right,

in the mainstream institutions,

but for a long time,

because of this dynamic

where it appears to be

a shift to the right

and therefore a concession

to Trump and to MAGA, the leftists were able to retain

dominance over the kind of Drew Pavu types, right?

To the point of Drew Pavu is like, you know, actually I'm a right-winger now. I'm not even left-wing.

Anyway, and I hope you guys are following me and, like, understand what I'm talking about here.

It's complicated, but it's also super simple, you know?

Um... So, yeah. simple, you know.

So, yeah.

So what did I think in 2020?

You know, in 2020, I had the hope that, actually, I hoped that this specific contradiction between Destiny and Hassan would provoke Piker to actually embrace this darkness, you know, the left-wing darkness, and kind of, in some sense, coalesce and converge with MAGA, in the MAGA-communist sense, and be like, okay, you know, we should be skeptical toward the institutions. We should be, we should be independent from them. We should bully nerds, destiny, and so on.

We should be like Maga and bully the nerds.

We should say, you know, you said Stalin was authoritarian and he killed 500 trillion people.

We should fucking have the Ievindrago response

and be like

okay based

I don't know like we should

embrace

the trolling the libs

type of thing

that's how we're going to make leftism or the left wing

distinct and independent like i'm not saying mimic maga and copy maga i'm saying like

adopt the same role,

embrace, I should say,

the same rogue,

illiberal tendencies

with respect

to being outside

of the neoliberal hegemony.

And that creates, yes, a type of proximity to MAGA.

And that would have allowed...

My dream for the left wing in America has never been,

oh, we're just going to have politics that directly reflects our ideology.

It was more like, I've always been realistic about politics since the Bernie era, okay?

Why the fuck would I even entertain Bernie Sanders?

I've always been a Marxist. I've always been a Marxist.

I've always been a revolutionary Marxist.

But I also understand politics is reality, not ideology, right?

Anyway, my strategy, the post-Bernie strategy I've always dreamed of is let's build a left wing out of MAGA.

Instead of fighting with liberals over the liberal hegemony,

let's raise an army of barbarians from MAGA

to give the left wing the substance and power

that it fucking needs to crush the enemy.

That was my dream.

It's always been, I didn't care about, I don't, listen, by the way, the culture stuff, it's

second fiddle.

Like, it's not that I, people, people didn't clock me the right way.

They thought, oh, Haas is a, he's a guy who just hates feminists or something,

or he's an in-cell who's upset at women or feminism,

and he's just,

he just cares about masculinity because he's homophobic and transphobic.

No, I wanted the left wing to have the masculinity to literally be Ivan Drago and crush

liberals with a hammer. That's what I wanted. I wanted the left wing to have a backbone, to have the power.

In some sense, that is very masculine.

But understand the content of what I cared

about was revenge,

revenge against Hillary

and the Democratic establishment.

Revenge against these people who pushed identity politics to crush left-wing politics, which did have a chance and would have been an alternative to Trump in 2015, but it was crushed. I wanted revenge for that.

And not simply revenge for petty reasons.

Brutal Stalin's stuff.

I'm not simply talking about revenge in some petty sense.

I'm talking about...

I saw a strand of left-wing politics that had fucking potential in 26.

It was fucking crushed and erased.

But I remembered it.

I remembered it.

And I had a specific vision and strategy for how we can remain faithful to that.

You know, that's it.

That's really it.

It's really simple.

I've always been left wing, okay?

But I also understood what happened.

And I understood this.

There's something about the left that's different from neoliberal, Democrat, whatever, progressive.

That's all I'm trying to say.

Okay.

And that's where I could. That's the, that's the origin story of, with respect to domestic U.S. politics, infrared.

I hope you understand that.

Um,

so I hoped in 2020, when destiny clocked hasan correctly i would argue as an illiberal rogue

uh maga type post maga type danger or something

I was hoping

he would embrace it

and uh

something very strange happened

instead which which is fascinating

I would have never I thought it was inevitable

what I wanted to happen I thought it was inevitable.

What I wanted to happen, I actually thought was inevitable, but somehow reality had other plans, I guess, and something strange happened.

Instead of that happening, it was Destiny and the neoliberals who were clocked as dark and rogue and illiberal.

And Hassan was the face of the liberal mainstream for a long time and got away with that and destiny was marginalized and destroyed now our best interpretation of that is that this was a consequence of the

ruthless maneuvering and

effective

really effective and

efficient ability for

the

Hassan Piker Coalition to crush

the opposition.

But nonetheless, should the communists not disdain to conceal their views?

Should we not be a little more open and honest?

Why do we have to hide from ourselves and from the public

Mr. Crabs

you're really missing it a lot

you're saying critical

support for troop of like what are you

fucking talking about

I don't even know what you're

interpreting from what I'm saying but it's kind of the

opposite I was because no, no, the whole thing about the lawsuit with Destiny, that came after.

What I'm talking about was in 2020 to 2022.

Also, it was because during the 2020 riots, Destiny was like, oh, you know, he supports Kyle Rittenhouse.

That was a huge thing.

That he defeated himself when he did that, by the way.

Totally defeat.

He logic-lorded himself into marginalization.

With respect to his, like, status within the liberal mainstream.

He was banned from Twitch for a long time and

departed I remember I love recalling the facts of history keep believing

Hassan is an illiberal force when he's being followed by Alex Soros

on Instagram.

No, you're right. Everything is just one thing. You're right.

Everything is just one thing.

You're right.

Everything is just one thing.

It's just like everything is just, it's all just one thing.

Everything, as Marxism says, everything is just one thing.

You know, as dialectics teaches us

uh there are no opposing tendencies within anything it's all just one thing and you know what actually it is it's the good guys Caleb, Caleb Moppin's CPI, versus the bad guys.

And it's actually just that simple.

We just have to continue shouting the right slogans,

and we will be able to strategically maneuver within reality the most effectively.

Just have to have the right slogans and that's it.

Right?

Let me ask you a question.

Do you think I'm fucking retarded?

No, no, no, really. I mean it. No no no really I mean it no no no really like look at me

do you think I'm fucking retarded

like do you think I'm a mental retard

with Down syndrome or something like

no look at me like do you think I'm

fucking retarded

you think I'm fucking retarded?

Do you think I'm stupid in my fucking head and I'm a actual fucking retard?

Because if you think that, just say it.

Honestly, just say it if that's what you think.

You'll save me a lot of time.

And... you'll save me a lot of time and just insult me and call me a fucking retard

I know that Soros

supports Asan Piker I know that Soros supports Asan Piker.

I know that the Democratic establishment supports Asan Piker.

I know they have been supporting Hassan Piker for years.

I know that mainstream institutions of media

and think tanks

overall have clocked him as a force for good

that's a given that's what's given

can we establish a baseline that we all already fucking know that and it's something

to be taken for granted and it's given? Of course it's true. Of course it's true but that why simultaneously are there still tensions tensions.

Where do those tensions come from?

Because the specific theory,

the specific theory, no, there's no soros wing it's all a soros wing you don't know what you're fucking talking about

you're like mentally retarded the crypto maga wing of the dnc drew pavlouou, who's an Australian,

by the way,

should excise from Hassan

and deal a blow

to the Soros wing.

You have lost the

fucking plot.

You've lost the fucking plot.

This guy is saying that he thinks that Drew Pavlou, like, you know, I don't know,

neoliberal, open neoliberal Democrats who are like you know Hassan

is too extreme for supporting Hamas

he's saying they're the progressive ones

and that Hassan Piker represents George Soros

and that these are Cryptomaga people

who somehow I don't know

I don't know I haven't

streamed for

two weeks

and I'm seeing

these crazy things

like these crazy

forms of

consciousness develop

I congratulated

the community

for having it

shit together

while I was gone

and then I'm seeing like a the community for having it shit together while I was gone.

And then I'm seeing like a regular chatter say the

craziest shit. I just don't even know

where it comes from.

Hassan doesn't support

Hamas. It doesn't matter if he support Hamas.

It doesn't matter if he supports Hamas.

He's being attacked for supporting Hamas.

Is he not being attacked for doing that?

Why would it fucking matter who he supports?

People are loudly complaining and making a problem out of the fact that they

perceive that he's doing that. in any case

it's a given that Hassan Piker has been propped up by Soros and all these other people

they're definitely I agree overall he's been clocked as a force for good

a counterweight to the red pill a counterweight to the alt right a progressive counterweight to the red pill, a counterweight to the alt-right, a progressive counterweight that is blue-pilling a generation of...

Those were the narratives they were running about him, and it revealed why they supported him.

Okay?

I know that.

It's a given.

But guess what?

There are also other tensions that are beginning to manifest themselves, which reflect the fact

there has always been an irreducibly illiberal tendency within Hassan Piker, which, no, you can't say is Soros.

You can't.

There's always been an irreducibly illiberal tendency there where

it's always been there. Now

how has he articulated it?

Maybe he thinks he's hiding his power level

and he's playing a long game or something.

I can't fucking tell you.

But if you don't see that in the long term, there's always been an irreducibly illiberal

tendency, I'm not even saying it's like the most, it's the fundamental one by way of

principle for him.

I'm just saying, what is the specific reason for Hassan Piker to support the People's Republic

of China? Let's start there. Why does Hassan overall have a pro-China attitude? Is Alex Soros compelling him

to defend China?

I'm not saying he's, okay, Mr. Crabs, 9,000.

Okay, but why is he lopping in that way?

Tell me why.

What is the reason for the larp that Hassan Piker is pro-China?

Why is he? Why was he not unconditionally pro-Ukraine?

Why during the SMO did he continually try to maintain this nuanced stance where yes he's denouncing Putin in Russia

but he's also going out of his way to say that he blames NATO and why is it that after

October 7th he justifies the resistance why is it why does he take these stances tell me why he endorsed

fenderman in 2022 for we all know the reason why he did that because he's rewarded by the Democratic establishment for shilling for the Democrats.

Okay, we know that though.

Like, that's not a mystery.

That's not the mystery, Mr. Crabs.

Like, please be fucking intelligent.

That's not the mystery

we know why he's a democrat

we fucking know why

he's a fucking shit lib

we know that

but tell me why he has all these other views

which cannot be explained

no he didn't okay boy all these other views, which cannot be explained.

No, he didn't. Okay.

But why didn't he just go full Drew Pavlu? Why is he maintaining

something? Why is he not

destiny? Do you

understand what I'm fucking saying? Like,

you need to think in your head.

Your purity testing him.

I'm not arguing with you about the fact that he's not a fucking comsimal.

He's not a comsimal.

I agree.

He's not an exemplary model communist.

I agree.

But nonetheless, how the fuck do you explain him giving kudos to Jackson

Hinkle? When Jackson gave

his speech in Yemen and Hassan

Piker saw it on stream and reacted to it,

you want to know what he fucking said? He said,

that's based.'s like you know

Jackson he literally

praised us several

times by the way

he did he did praise us

several times it's a fact

he has praised us several times

so I'm chairman of the ACP i want you to explain to me why this

soros democrat shill which he may very well be but why does he take these peculiar stances

that are in no way necessitated by that.

That's all I want to know.

Not disagreeing he's a Democrat on all these other things.

I'm just saying, I feel like I'm being straw man here.

When I say there's always been an irreducibly

illiberal tendency

that has always been there.

And you're saying, well, no,

because he's a liberal's...

I agree.

I mean, like, you're saying, oh, well, no, because Hassan Piker has always...

Practically shilled for...

No, no, I agree.

But for no... For reasons that cannot be explained,

he's also,

in a very limited way,

taken stances that hurt him and don't help him.

I'm open to your response to this,

by the way, because I can give you a response.

What if the irreducible tendency is just an act,

and Hassan is a Soros Lib Dem?

Okay, finally, we have someone who...

You could have just said that if that's what you want to say that he's faking it and i i'm raising the question of why why fake it though why does that

help him to fake it, though? Why does that help him to fake it?

Maybe, maybe, okay, I could give you a potential explanation, and let's evaluate the explanation and see how plausible it is.

Maybe he, maybe he is preemptively hijacking a potential independent left wing

and that's why

it's because he's trying to

shitcoat

a powerful

form of independent left wing politics

that doesn't exist yet

or some of the most schizophrenic explanations which

give us a lot of credit which could be true maybe it's true maybe it's because hasan is trying

to opportunistically appropriate the tendencies and things that make ACP appealing.

Maybe this is all just a sci-op to stop ACP and associate the pro-China tankie position with Hassan rather than the ACP, you know, because

maybe, maybe, maybe that's why. I feel like we need to be a little realistic about how much we're actually on his radar,

which we are for sure on his radar,

but I'm saying like how much though?

Like really,

is he going to risk his goodwill and good favor

with mainstream media just to...

And then, you know, the explanation i really hate is is i the idealist autistic

one which says our position is true therefore it exerts itself discursively, like gravity, such that, you know, it's so, like, autistic.

It's like, okay, because our position is true, Hassan Piker is going out of his way to acquiesce and

concede to it because

it is unavoidably true.

It's just so self-evident

and obvious that Marxism

Leninism is correct

and it's self-evident

and it's like a given and it is un-evident and it's like a given

and it is undeniable and unignorable.

I hate to break it to you

but Marxism-Leninism as an ideology

is very ignorable.

It's very deniable and very ignorable. I promise you it is. From 1991, until recently, it was a completely marginal worldview associated with Jason Unruh.

That's what a tankie was, Jason Unru.

Why did I pay respect to Jason Unru?

Because he was the face of Tankies for a while.

So don't sit here and pretend like, oh, the, it's just unignorable.

That's why he's opportunist.

Well, it is kind of ignorable, though.

You know, so don't be unrealistic.

Don't be unrealistic.

It's appeasement that effectively neutralizes his radical base

you have to at least it's possible okay but where does the radical base come

from

why are you arguing in a circle

where's the radical base come from

with that radical base not reflect

and irreducibly illiberal tendency?

You know, maybe the irreducibly illiberal tendency

is something within Hassan Piker only to the extent

that it's a tendency among

his audience, but you would

still have to concede that

that that tendency is in him

because of his audience

in this case, right? That's all I'm saying, because of the audience in this case, right?

That's all I'm saying, because of the tendencies among his audience.

I don't think there's any spontaneous necessity that incentivizes people to defend the Soviet Union in America. I don't. In American politics. I don't think

there's pressure. Maybe we're putting the pressure on. Maybe we're the accelerant. I think we are

actually to a huge extent. I just want you to understand that this is the space that matters.

Like, let's say Hassan Piker becomes like Kat Abu Ghazala.

Who will stop him?

Well, it would open up a vacuum, potentially, that we could seize seize upon people like us could seize upon i

should say but i think that's already happening i think we are actually seizing upon it.

But I also think...

I also think...

Can I tell you guys the truth?

Can I tell you the truth?

You don't want to hear this, Mr. Crabs.

I know you don't want to hear it.

Asan Piker, privately, I'm not saying I have confirmation of this because I don't, but I just know it for a fact.

He thinks we are overall good. He supports and sympathizes with us. He'll never say it in public but he does because he sees us as a

strengthening of the left wing position to his left and therefore a way for him to look more moderate and alleviate pressure away from him.

He, for some reason, I don't know why he does. I can't tell you I have an explanation. I'm just telling

you this is like an objective consequence. This is the consequence of an objective and impartial

analysis, right?

I've had a lot of time to think about it.

Here's the truth.

He

wants to forward

a distinctly

left wing agenda

he's doing it in a horrible way by the way

but he wants to do that

and that puts pressure on him

by the

moderate liberal whatever you want to call them

right within the Democratic Party.

And we take a lot of that pressure off and therefore make it possible for him to maneuver in the way that he is.

And that's why he's been taking more liberties, you know, defending the proletarian dictatorship and so on and so on.

I want you to be smart and understand what's going on there.

I'm also convinced that when he fed jacketed Jackson, he actually believed that It wasn't because he...

Um...

was trying to portray Jackson as a Fed while knowing he wasn't.

He actually did believe that.

Because he didn't even have information.

Like, he genuinely had no understanding.

But, um...

You should be paying dues then.

Um... be paying dues then.

I'll tell you this.

If he broke with the democrats and started endorsing just if he inside i don't i don't even care if he formed his own party if he formed his

own strategy it doesn't matter what it is

if he went dark in some kind

of way,

holy fuck.

The left wing in America

would

lose the platform that it has now

within the hegemony, but it would free up so much

energy that would go into cultivating yes something less powerful than the democratic party

but something also on the map if acp can be put on the map with what limited

resources and capacity that we have, imagine all the energy that could be freed up that's now

being tied in with attempting to, you know, win the ground of the Democratic Party, win hegemony over the...

Imagine if that was freed up and put into cultivating something distinct and independent.

It would free up a lot.

But ultimately, I'm going to just circle back to the theme of my writing of communism in the post-Maga age and explain...

Um... And explain... Um... and explain why maybe there's hesitancy doing that because

I think Hassan Piker like everyone else in, doesn't understand how do you go from the individual

consciousness to collective existence? How do you create a collective movement? How do you make a movement?

How do you make a movement? How do you make a party? How do you make an organization that's independent from the hegemony? How do you make a movement how do you make a party how do you make an organization

that's independent from the hegemony

how do you actually do that

and that's why I want to

emphasize the systems theory

the hegemony is rooted

in something

like why is there is rooted in something like

why is there

like you have two extremes

conformity with the system

and forming a retarded

larp cult

I don't think the ACP is a

LARP cult, actually.

I think there are tendencies within our online movement, which would, if given dominance, turn us into that.

Thankfully, they don't have dominance but uh we are something unique for sure

and it's sad when people don't understand that and see the potential in it but for certain

there are distinct there are two distinct

tendencies.

Online retard cults,

not online retard cults,

usually,

and full

conformity with the system.

And full conformity with the system. And he doesn't understand there's a gold install in his path, which is we need to free the system.

In some sense, it's not that we should fight the system.

We need to free the system

from the institutional constraints

that have been put upon it.

We need more systems.

We need to let millions of systems bloom.

We need to unleash the contradictions within the system.

We need to liberate the rogue system

systemic rogue

tendencies

waiting to

run wild

and

instead of conformity and and this is like my dialectical inversion of our immediate intuition. Intuition.

You want to know what it is?

Here's what it is. You know, You know, You see, ones if you understand, ones if you understand one's if you understand so is what's up

like that's how I arrived at the infrared vision in a way when it comes to domestic politics

that's where it can i think that's that was my aha moment It's these experts in glasses who are the fucking Larpers and the fucking Larpers and the subjectivists.

That's the whole thing.

They're the ones larping.

And to free ourselves from their larp, we have to tap into something.

We have to risk having some skin in the game.

Can't simply conform to the system.

Isn't this such an interesting

contrast with Landian acceleration,

which says,

let's just fully embrace the deterioratorialization

of capital

and whatever. It's like, well, no. It's actually

we have to raise

our fist.

We have to break

the hegemony.

To unleash the productive forces, we have to raise our fist.

We have to risk having a specific subjectivity, a specific psychology.

Have some fucking skin in the game.

No, it doesn't mean

be a LARP cult.

What it means

is... What it means... It means to risk the process, the difficult and long process of aligning our individual subjective consciousness with objective

principles.

All the difficulties in turmoil, both subjectively and objectively that that entails

we have to raise our fist and repeat the accursed of the accursed of what we call a personality.

The ageal critique of you is you're taking revolutionary discourse and mobilizing it towards a reformist theory of change.

I like better, but not communist politicians.

Dude.

You see, this is like a retarded response to Hassan Piker, to be honest.

There are no communist politicians and uh dude what do you mean

elect communist politicians

if you think

that there is a capacity to elect

communist politics

okay well i mean it, I guess it's...

Greek Communist 134.

Thankfully, it's not an ACP guy.

ACP guys are LARP game.

Decisions right now, and I'm simply standing ahead of it.

You're delusional about what the average person thinks about comments.

And then, okay, so Mr. Crabs is saying, I will grant that Hassan refuted the Hassan, sorry, the Hamas rape hoax which is definitely

an liberal tendency

okay there we go

I mean what

so what are you saying

you're saying

well why did he endorse

Graham Platner

dude

why did he endorse

Kamala

fucking Harris

do you know what I mean like why did he endorse Kamala fucking Harris?

Do you know what I mean?

Like, why did he endorse Biden?

Who do you think you're arguing with?

Like, you don't even know what I'm saying.

Communism, let alone socialism okay it's my point is that he should be excised for what though what are you saying i hope he's kicked out are you at yeah he's he will hate that i'm

saying this of course i hope hasan is kicked out of the Democrat, and he fails to continue being there, because it'll force him to be independent and face the consequences of, which would be, he'd be twice as prominent as he is now, I think.

It's so shocking.

That's your argument.

Okay, okay, you should should just said that confuse the

fuck out of me what commie says thank you for the 10 gift of subs

anyway i i do think that it's

it's silly to constantly have to

duke it out

yeah because if it happens he will become

you know

a force in U.S. politics

you know

Janis Varoufakis

is super unprincipled

I don't like that guy

but when he told Hassan, you know, hey, you should directly just be involved, you should

directly, you know, run for office or something.

And then it sounds like, well, no, no, I'm just a streamer.

It's like, this is the thing.

I'm not saying to Glaze Hassan. I'm not saying that. Don't, don't, this is the thing. I'm not saying to glaze Hassan.

I'm not saying that.

Don't fucking do that.

I'm saying, you know,

the main problem with him is that he lacks self-confidence, actually.

Can we just say that?

He doesn't have confidence.

He doesn't recognize that the door is open and the whole, the fucking, there's no wizard

behind the curtain.

Yes.

Yes, you can go from a streamer to being a political figure. There's no, there's no like, you know, PhD of fucking politics that exists. It's totally an open door.

Oh, with my left flank when...

Isn't Trump the one who proved that?

I'm getting

fucking yelled at non-stop by endlessly

more powerful forces

that actually do have some long-standing

impact in American political discourse.

We're talking about

American senators. You know, you know

why I've been so charitable to Piker?

It's honestly some type of

Shiite

sectarian tribalism.

I found out he's an oliv.

Did you know he's an olivie. Did you know he's an olivie? I was upset for a long time. I didn't know he was olivie. I didn't know that. It made me upset. I started being angry and I went through all the stages of grief. He's descended from the Kisle Bosch.

His family's from the Kisle Bosch.

And it's like the...

Yeah, I don't know I mean I had all the stages of grief when I found

out but but then I eventually I had to realize okay you know it makes total sense though the whole Okay. You know?

Don't. It makes total sense, though.

The whole thing is that he's a Shiite.

That's the secret. The whole illiberal tendency that, like, the whole thing, he's doing a, he's trying to do it to Kia. It's wrong.

He's misguided. I think he's misguided.

Hey, shoot me. I think he's misguided.

And American... I think he's misguided.

I don't know.

Like, literally,

I don't know. I literally, I don't know.

I'm not saying I know that for a fact, but I kind of think he's misguided.

Representatives in both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, we're talking about mainstream media that is like actively calling me a threat to not only just the Democratic Party's future,

but also the future of this country.

And you're over here telling me about like some fucking guy

who works for the ACP or something.

Uh, yelling at me because I don't subscribe to a movement that I think that there's a by the way there's only two people that work for the eight I don't know what he's talking about here, what he's referring to.

That will lean into whatever

the algorithm presents

as a...

as the new thing

the focus on, which is what

the ACP did for fucking years, leaning

into Andrew Tate,

leaning into all of these,

like, red-pilled guys,

as though that was the truth.

He's not talking about the ACP.

He's talking about the founders of the ACP,

to be clear.

True way to reach across

the aisle to the fucking working class.

Okay?

It's ridiculous.

They call me fucking

talus that is literally

textbook tailism that is literally

what Lenin extensively wrote about

it's really not though

again

I don't know.

I have to keep explaining this.

Tailism was about tendencies within the masses that were classified on the basis of their relationship to revolutionary action, not openness to polyamorous relationships.

Like backward,

the backward part of the masses were the ones who were hesitant

when it came to,

like, you know,

blowing up royal palaces.

And the advanced ones were ready to storm the capitals and seize them.

It wasn't about, oh oh the advance are more into um uh what is it called

pegging is it called pegging when the woman has a strap on and goes to town or whatever is that what

it's one it someone yeah that's what it's called yeah that's not what it means to be more advanced

or backwards so when you're tailing the masses it's not as though, oh, you're just, um, you are feeding into the tendencies,

which I regard as toxic or bigoted or something. That has nothing to do with tailism.

Before we talk about the, you know, the red pill or Andrew Tate thing, let's just get that out of the, let's just clear the air on that.

Matter of fact, Lenin straight up wrote about tailism, opportunism,

when it came to reactionary

anti-Semitism.

He straight up said

if we were tailists,

we would focus on

one of the most

prominent movements

at the time,

which was anti-Semitism.

Yeah, but

no one was doing that. So Lenin

was engaging in polemics

with

talus of the

more Menshevik

economicistic variety. I know the geese of the, you know, more Menshevik uh,

economistic variety.

I know the geese people think

economism is class reductionism.

It's,

you know,

what's what the intersectional Hillary supporters

accused Bernie Bros.

of,

but that's not true.

Economism rejected the need for revolutionary political change entirely in favor of this,

you know, more Jehu-type economic, whatever, fatalism.

But, um... economic, whatever, fatalism. But the tailists

would justify their position on the basis of making reference to those tendencies

among the masses, which were the most politically unprepared and passive when it came to revolutionary action.

And so when he was polemicizing with these nerdy, you know, urban shitlibs, which is what they were, intelligentsia shitlib, intelligentsia conformis, he said, by your logic, why don't we just simply, if you're justifying your position by saying, well, the masses

aren't ready, so let's just generalize this one tendency among the masses when there were other

tendencies, he goes, why not just join the pogroms then? It's not as though Lenin was arguing

against Marxists who advocated for pogroms then. It's not as though Lenin was arguing against Marxists who advocated for pogroms.

He was using that as a rhetorical device to polemicize with Urban Shitlib opportunist conformists.

So let's be clear, Lenin was not accusing anti-Semites, quote-unquote, of being Taylorless.

He was using as a rhetorical device posing the hypothetical of, well, why shouldn't we just support pogroms then to put to be

clear it's like imagine if lennon was an american who lived in 2026 lenin would simply tell hassan

hasan piker you say that we need to support the democratic party because that's where Americans are at right now.

But by this logic, why don't we just support Trump? Because Trump was elected in 2024.

And clearly he reflects the reality of U.S. politics the most.

Or instead of Trump, Whippets, well, Hassan, if you're going to make your argument that we need to work within the Democratic Party, because that's where the masses are at,

why don't we just support Whippets? Because that's also a popular trend among the masses.

So it's a rhetorical argument Lenin was employinging it wasn't referencing anyone who actually was justifying or supporting pogroms

or advocating for any i don't think hasan will be tipping scales in this election

so why even care he won't but the reason I care is because I think

there's a certain quantum of energy that needs to be put in to the movement that the ACP wants to be part of.

And I think Hassan could not be decisive when it comes to shifting U.S. politics.

I agree.

He can't be.

But he could be decisive in accelerating the development of independent forms of organization and politics in this country

if we have a long-term view ahead

and think in terms of years or maybe decades even

rather than the next election cycle.

I'm a very long-term thinker.

You need to appreciate my sage-like patience,

like a Buddhist sage-like patience.

Because, frankly...

Frankly... Frankly... um frankly

imagine how exhausted and tired I am of this discourse

it's like nothing new is under the sun

we've been arguing about this since 2016.

But I have to accept that if I want golden nuggets of novelty,

if I want something to happen that's new,

I have to appreciate the fact

that you require a very meticulous discernment.

There are things that are new about this specific cycle of Democrat shilling, which deserve our attention and special consideration.

That's all.

Yes, the same mistake is being made

as was made

in 2020 you know

we heard the same yeah

but there's something new happening

this time

and we should wherever

we can wherever we can nothing new is under the sun and nothing ever happens i agree

but wherever we can let's have a meticulous discernment regarding those golden nuggets of novelty

that are rearing themselves and let's do our best to cultivate them and draw them

out

and accelerate their development it's not the same if you pay enough attention that's all i'm saying

and with the with a long-term view in mind you know let's think about this from the what could change here potentially i think conditions are ripe for the possibility that hiker could break with the democratic party

could not necessarily will but could this time.

It didn't happen in 2020.

It didn't happen in 2016.

But...

Didn't happen in 24, obviously, but maybe it can happen.

Maybe it can happen sooner than we think.

And when it does happen, we need to take it very seriously.

That's all I'm saying.

Would we prefer everyone to be correct right now?

Yeah, we would but but we don't control the time in which this thing unfold all we could do is be correct now for sure but while we're correct here and now which

we are ACP is a beacon of correctness on everything

let's be very meticulous and discerning when it comes to tendencies that can be observed

outside of our bunker.

Blaming Jews

instead of focusing on

class contradictions, instead of focusing

on class first politics,

he literally wrote it.

These people who routinely yell at me calling me a fucking tailist for the liberal Zionist

Democratic Project or whatever the fuck

are themselves engaging in the actual reactionary

talist mentality right? engaging in the actual reactionary Taylor's mentality

how though

but how

but how

for example let's look at the most out.

For example, let's look at the most egregious crimes we committed during the Andrew Tate era,

when Andrew Tate was prominent and stirring so much controversy.

What we did is we exercised an intelligence, meaning a discriminated, a discriminant attitude toward the online phenomena.

Jackson chose to emphasize and highlight, for example, some of the correct foreign policy stances that Andrew Tate took.

Trying to focus on, yes, pro-R-K, you know, making that the object of the discourse.

And then when Jackson went on Fresh and Fit,

and he was kind of cornered about, you know,

should women vote or not.

Now, again, I keep repeating the story of how I talked to jackson after and he was like fuck that was

hard like he was cornered not because it's hard to say yes of course women should vote of course

we know women should vote okay like what are you stupid are you retarded like do you what you think me

and Jackson think women shouldn't vote

it's like

no

of course we know women should vote

all right

but how do you win

in that scenario

how do you not in that scenario?

How do you not look like a hysterical,

you know, in a... How do you not, like...

How do you win that audience, right?

And... how do you win that audience right and the way he tried to maneuver he tried to maneuver it in a specific way that you know avoided making himself appear as though he's like, you know, this blue-pilled, whatever.

But it's the same when it comes to the JQ and all these other things.

It's like you have to, you can't simply just, you do have to take into account the optics

and whether people perceive you in such a way that

okay you're just some blue-pilled

whatever right it's not it's actually an art

it's not easy

it's not simple it's not tail it's not an art. It's not easy. It's not tale,

tailism.

It's something much more difficult.

And something that requires a lot more intelligence

and the true sense of like exercising discrimination.

Um, exercising discrimination uh...

kentrezzi with the five what's up bro appreciate you

in any case, um... Let me continue.

So, no, it wasn't tailing the phenomena. We were simply, again, exercising this.

Let's circle back.

Meticulous discernment with respect to tendencies that exist in any given viral contradiction or controversy that manifests itself in the discourse or in the information space, how do we exploit that in a way that accelerates or accentuates the development of things in such a way that leads to the kind of opening of a space within information space for communism.

How do you do that? And this is the art we've mastered you know and people confuse that for

tailism but it's not it's like more like a translation. It's an art of translation.

It's not an art of pandering.

No, no, we're trying to translate.

Because we know, you know, the irony with Piker is that he needs to understand something.

Like this wisdom he thinks he has

where he's like no no I'm a realist

and

I'm not a sectarian

you know the geese magazine people they make

the same argument

instead of being a sectarian cult

let's be realistic about politics.

It's like, no, no, the ones who have mastered this logic is me and Jackson.

Like, we've mastered it.

We know it more than any...

We know that you can't just directly impose your ideology on reality.

You have to discern

an objective phenomenon

the

rational alignment

between that

and whatever's truth you've arrived at subjectively.

Like it's indirect.

The relationship is indirect, not direct.

So the art of maneuvering information space

or drawing out tendencies within information space that open the space for

revolutionary consciousness is an indirect art it's not direct you can't just simply shout communist slogans because nobody understands what that fucking means. They don't understand the substance it's made of.

So we, we, we, maga-communists are the ones who understand this better than anyone else it's but it's precisely why we have

uh we don't need to use the democratic party as a vehicle by which we acquire a pulse on the real world and reality because the democratic party is itself

a retarded cult it's not reality it's a harvey weinsteinian epsteinian kind of cult of personality and some subjective whims and fancies of various different people. It's not actually a system. Systems are progressive. Systems are great. They're impersonal.

Systems are fine.

Democratic Party's not a system.

It's actually like a fief.

It's a collection of different fiefdoms of these boomers.

It's like a boomer prison planet.

It's not a system.

Systems are good, actually.

Systems are progressive from the Marxist standpoint.

Because they just work impersonally, right? That's not what the democratic party is in any case um is anyone so ones if you're surprised that on my first stream back i'm saying

the things i'm saying um ones if i've surprised you in some way.

Maybe I have. You know, if you weren't talking you would you would never made the comment i would have actually because i just get the sense that when they talk about tailism and advanced versus backward, they're not

actually talking about any logic of politics or revolutionary political change. They're

talking about this specific neoliberal

or whatever you call it

understanding of like

how do we turn people into

enlightened and open

people who are just like

totally above any attachment

to you know oh I'm just no longer masculine. I just

gonna paint my nails and I'm gonna transcend all determinations and just like become this like open like you know hippie or something like that's not but that's not what backward or advanced means to Lenin that has nothing to do with the discriminatory intelligence by

which Lenin classifies

things on a basis of advanced

or backward. He's not saying

like

Lena Dunham

is advanced and

Kid Rock is

backward. Like that's

he's, Lenin would probably

say that both of them would be in a ditch

maybe, right?

But he's not saying like what, he's not

saying like, um,

you know, purple-haired uh you know purple-haired video game

characters like that's advanced and like Gamergate is backward like that's not no that's not

he's not saying that. He's saying,

the backward people

are the ones

that are passive,

conformists when it comes to politics,

and the advanced ones are,

the rowdy masses

who are ready to,

like,

you know,

throw them all to cocktails at, uh, you know, throw them all to cocktails at

you know, I don't know

at the police

barracks or something.

So

he, you need to

under, but leftists don't, they think

backwards in advance as like...

Like, advanced is like the Obama era march of history,

where it's like, oh, we're having gay marriage and abortions for all.

And now it's like men

don't need to have a ball sack anymore

you can just kind of

detach your ball sack and put it in a put it in a wireless charging pod and walk around without balls we don't have to have

balls anymore.

We're past that.

That's so outdated.

We're now in an era where we can just put our balls in a...

A ball compartment? a bulb compartment

and walk around with no nuts

that was like the Obama idea of like

you know

we're just going to transcend

all determinations. It's just, it was just

like totally past it, you know?

That's what it means to advance.

It's like some Fukuyama, like

crazy libtard nonsense. It's like, it has

nothing to do with communism.

It has nothing to do with Marxism. I'm sorry.

You know?

We're going to detach our balls and put them in a wireless, put them in our garage.

What are they called?

Electric Chargers, you know, for like our electric vehicles.

It worked, the same thing you put in your EV, you can detach your balls and put it on the

wireless charger in your garage. And you know, you don't even need it. You can, you can put it back on or you could take it off or you can buy new ones that have different color gradients.

You can get purple balls.

You don't need regular. You can get purple purple you can get all different ones that reflect your

personality you can have for for christmas you can get ones that are

that look like the Christmas

the Christmas

ornaments

you guys ever see the

onage pranks the guy who does

prank calls where he called the tattoo shop

as like he pretended to be like a vietnamese guy and he uh he called the tattoo shop and he's like

he's like can you do a tattoo

where you

you uh

you uh

you uh

it was like

it was around Christmas time

right

and he's like

my girlfriend wants uh for Christmas time, right? He's like, my girlfriend wants, uh, for Christmas time, tattoo a tree on me, like on my torso, like a giant.

I don't know why I still find it so funny

Tattoo on like a giant Christmas tree

And then

Tattoo my balls is like two

Christmas ornaments

Like you know the spherical ornaments you put

on a Christmas tree? He's like,

yeah, tattoo them to look like

that. And he

kept, the tattoos

was out, uh, no, we don't do that.

He kept calling

them like over and over again.

Asking...

Asking to do that.

I don't know. I found it so funny.

It's an Arab humor, I guess.

It's just like, shit, Arabs fine, 20.

I don't know. back to Fukuyama

Yeah that's how leftists understand progress

In the Marxist tradition

They just superimposed this like

Fukuyama

Vision of progress tradition. They just superimposed this like Fukuyama vision

of progress and assume that's what

Marxists meant by advanced or backward

and it's not.

Anyway, did we endorse or tail the Hendrude Tate

phenomenon

no

honestly you could you know what you could say you could say we are just radically

indifferent

there's a ratit there's actually a scary indifference You could say we are just radically indifferent.

There's actually a scary indifference we have.

We don't, well, we really don't care.

We really don't care about anything except communism.

Like, there's this radical indifference where we're just like,

yes, we will try to exploit any contradictions we can

to advance

our agenda,

the communist agenda.

We don't care.

You think we ever gave a fuck about Andrew Tate?

We ever give a shit about Andrew Tate?

It's like, okay, so many people are

invested in the Andrew Tate phenomena

when it was happening in 23 or

22. They're like, oh,

you know, I'm losing my mind. It's masculinity

as a crisis.

Oh, my God, should we be masculine or should we be gay or should we be soft and what's going on a feminist or not feminist

and we like the dark marxists were sitting in the dark shadows, and we're just like, we're going to kill all of you.

No, that's literally a joke.

That's a joke.

That's not what I'm saying.

But... It's like a...

It's humor.

It's like hyperbolic.

I just kind of feel like from our standpoint

everything is the same in a way

and we'll just do whatever we can

to advance

communism whatever we can to advance communism but that's what we care about we care about

communism we care about revolutionary change we care about the revolution it's all for the revolution everything care about the revolution. It's all for the revolution. Everything's for the revolution.

It's like people think I hated feminists. Actually, I like feminists. I've always liked feminists. Actually, I

love feminists.

I do like them. You can

say I love them in a way. I've always

um, the ones

who are angry at me and that I, even if they don't speak to me, they just see me and get angry because I have a beard.

I feel bad for them, actually.

I don't hate them.

I feel bad for them.

But the ones, every time I've talked to a feminist offline, I like them. I like them. They're cool. And they're... Many are stupid, for sure. Most probably are stupid i don't know what to say they're like, at least they have something to talk about, you know, at least they have something to talk about. Most people don't have anything to talk about. Most people don't have anything to talk about. Enduring. Yeah, they're endearing.

At least they're starting somewhere.

2021 Haas rolling his grave.

But where did it come from?

Where did it come from?

My whole schick is that I have a problem with women or something. I feel like that was

what happened is that it was invented and it was because I'm a masculine or something. And I thought,

I did have a problem with feminine men. I've always had an issue with the effeminization of males. I had an issue with

nerdy soy males. I've always had a problem with them. And because they're conniving and they're

weasel-like and they're just kind of like,

I'm going to snitch on you.

Like, I've always, of course I've always had a problem with them.

But when, the whole thing, but what they did, the soy males, what they did is they said,

oh, you're calling me out. I'm going to hide behind women and I'm going to make this about women.

So then they said, you know what, Haas actually hates women. His problem is with women. I never had a problem with women, but it was imposed on me.

And then it was just they constantly said it.

And I could have reacted in a lot of different ways.

I could have been defensive and been like, no, I'm such an ally.

And then how did I react to it?

I just kind of...

I was like...

I started trolling.

Like, straight up.

I was like, all right, if you say so.

And then it was like...

Oh, you see?

You see?

He doesn't care.

Actually, I don't care.

Honestly, I don't care if you perceive me this way.

But the fact I didn't care was how I apparently was coded as a misogynist.

Feminine women will absolutely snitch that.

Okay, but women and men are both evil and good is in both the man and the woman.

Is it true or no? Both the man and the woman. Is it true or no?

Both the man and the woman is evil and good.

Correct?

I'm just saying it's a lack of virtue that makes a man. Part of being virtuous as a man is to be a man. If a grandma falls down the stairs and a guy just walks past her, would it not be a reproach

when someone would say,

you're not a man,

a real man would help the grandma.

Like there's a normative component to it

that absolutely is moral.

And I don't know why I have to explain this, because most people understand it, but I guess I have to intellectually explain it, quote unquote.

Oh, there's a lot of women who are evil. I agree.

There's good and evil among both man and woman.

There's nothing about women that makes them less evil.

They're just prettier. Yeah. Uh-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h- I kind of feel like I'm like a Brian Griffin liberal

You know

It's crazy I'm saying that shit.

Holy fuck.

2026.

I'm saying the craziest shit.

I'm not a liberal, but I just, I feel like I never, I feel like there's like a type of cool liberal who's just like...

Who's just kind of like, um, neutral.

And I never had an issue with those type of people.

I've always had an issue with people who are like

actively tripping on some shit

and are just fucking wrong.

Right?

The most loud and masculine fratboy is way more humble and respectable than any soy male.

That's not true.

And I feel like that dichotomy has broken down.

It used to be true, maybe.

But now it's not because masculinity has become a performative thing that dudes,

basically everyone is soy, but now it's like clavicular, like there's ways that

men have performatively

adopted.

It's very in a fake,

in genuine way.

They're adopting the appearance of

masculine and whatever,

and it's like, it's totally fake.

But it's a simula, it's like a cybernetic simulation that is from the internet.

And that was after Andrew Tate, that's what started happening. It became like a performative,

cybernetic systemization of specific behaviors, mannerisms, appearances, and the authentic core is gone. It's like, the authentic core is gone.

It's like the authentic core has always been just being, having skin in the game, having something to live for and die for.

Like Che Guevara, right?

I don't think society is made up of soy males in the way it was in 2021, though.

Post Andrew Tate, all the soy males have become performatively masculine

and now

you

just kind of have to roll your eyes and be like

well it's not really what I meant

when I said stop being a little bitch it's not really what I meant when I said, stop being a little bitch.

It's really not what I.

What I meant is like have a fucking backbone and do what's right, stand up for what's right.

And stop being fake and inauthentic

start have some honor you know

but but what changed something changed

and now it's just

performativity

and so you can't really complain about it anymore in that way but we should remember how it was in

twenty twenty one like you straight up had dues that would just be like i remember on how it was in 2021. Like you straight up had doos

that would just be like, I remember on Twitch

it was like that. It was like, you just have people be like,

well, you know,

I personally think that

you know,

I personally think it's okay for my girlfriend to have a train run on her and that's

progressive and that's just like like that used to that was how it was i mean there was no self-awareness

like it was like that it was like back in uh 2021 it was like well i personally think that it's extremely insecure to

you know um have nuts it's extremely insecure what are you a squirrel

you don't need nuts

put your nuts away

tug them in

stop being so insecure

it's extremely Stop being so insecure.

It's extremely insecure to think that you have to walk around with nuts.

You don't.

You can put them away.

You can put them on the shelf it's extremely insecure

to

um

it was very weird

it was very weird

well

I personally think that I do wear a dress.

Everywhere I go, I wear a dress and nail polish.

That's just what I do.

And it was so serious, too.

They were actually serious.

They were like, I'm going to deconstruct, you know,

I'm going to wear a dress and put nail polish on.

I'm going to ban someone in this fucking chat.

Like, I don't, I'll ban you for one day, and if you ever say anything weird again, it'd be for life.

I should, I should do it for life, but, you know, it's like, I don't know.

Yeah, it was just weird.

And it was like, there was no self-awareness at all.

At least society now recognizes there's something strange and odd about that.

2021 was fucking weird.

I'll tell you that. It was extremely odd. All right, guys, I have a material incentive to stream more tomorrow and catch up with all of the money I have not made since I've been away.

I'm not going to tell you to crab it up because you've grabbed it up a lot for this stream

i'm just going to continue streaming consistently keep grabbing it up and future streams right

but also um i want everyone to clap for me.

I want a congratulations.

That's all.

Because, you know, when people say I'm a grifter,

it's like when I wrote that book for 30,000 pages,

30,000 words. 30,000 words.

Shout out to Christian.

I was with Christian in the hotel lobby for hours.

He had his laptop.

I had my laptop.

He was like, okay, I'm going to form, I'm going to add this to infrared.g. This is how we're going to

do it. You know, we're going to make it

look like this.

It's like he was the one hands-on

who coded everything. The design

came from Hakkan. You remember the design.

Christian took the design, took that.

He put it in infrared.g.

And he coded in everything I wrote.

He was able to put it in, the website.

So he helped.

But I did all that. It was so much effort and so much work.

You know how easy it would have been to paywall that shit? $15 if you want to read it.

You know we had thousands of unique visitors

thousands of unique visitors

it could pay all that

make money off of it somehow

what did we do and what did I do instead I said no it's free

it's completely free like no no, it's free. It's completely free.

Like, no questions asked.

It's totally free content.

You guys want me to continue doing that type of shit?

That's how I am.

I want everything to be free.

But you should support me.

Support my ability to just flexibly and freely drop free shit to you.

I feel like I'm an idiot for not paywalling and somehow monetizing that.

A lot of effort and work went into it on my end.

But I like to give things for free because I don't like being a cheap skate.

So that's all this.

I just clap for me. That's it. You don't have to pay me, but clap for me and say, Haas, congratulations. You're so great for just giving it for free. Thank you. Okay, I'm going to be back tomorrow or Monday, hopefully with much more energy.

I'm going to have more energy, don't worry.

I haven't slept in a long time, as you can tell.

Then we were you from travel.

I literally just got off a plane today.

But, yeah.

I have much more to talk about, but we have plenty of time.

And I think I will be streaming tomorrow.

I think so.

Goodbye.