THE OPPS RUNNING SCARED

The I'm Here we go again Thank you. I found I

Do I

Two

Two Two

I found a lover

Looking in blast

Wondon face

I don't know to

the best

I didn't know where I stand

What I'm to do.

I'm trying to forget and I've heard someone new.

So I'll spread on my knees to go and I'm going to the thoughts and we're so about me.

Someone to love but this is my story.

Look me on.

Don't let me down When I'm

a hundred One to

One

Two Two Two Two Two One Here we go again

I'm afraid of my knees

and you're going to

go ahead and see I'm going to be able to be.

I'm going to

I'm going to be in my story to my story You're going to let me

What I'm going to be down

Why don't

You're like to mind

You're going to come up in the box

Miss on my dream

Someone to love

I'm going to tell you my story

Give me your hands Don't let me down,

made a heart to the man. The One, my, yeah, what, chock, yeah, Jock, Jock, Jock, Jock, Jock, Jop Kna, Jock Jop!

Jop!

Jop!

Jop!

Jok, Mappet, Jock Jop! and so much, you know, but, you know, but,

uh,,

but the,,,,,,,, Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!

I'm Yeah! and the uh, uh, Bhopi, Bhopi, Bhopi,

Bhopi,

Bhopi,

uh, I'm a lot of you know Self-destruction system has been activated.

This island will self-destruct in 10 minutes. all the personnel must evacuate immediately to meet all the personnel

evacuates immediately Monday was So September 28

Daylight

The monsters have overtaken the city I'm going to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to be. Oh! Oh! and so

Oh!

Oh!

Oh! I'm 208.

208. Jay-Ly

The monsters

are still

a focus

big of So, I'm going to be a lot of

the

I'm I'm B'i B'i and the The

South is a good It's just a happy

out of the

This is the pilot

The gun is strong in

and then

and then Oh, and get it in it Oh,

the Lada

on the driveway

to be in a and the I'm Thank you. I'm going to be. Thank you. Quite enough tears for life time

Time Quite enough tears for lifetime.

Spend enough hours of bad night.

Begging for us, asking why I've cried

Quite enough.

Yes, boy, I'm tired.

So don't break my heart in tune.

Just don't go

ahead and

come

that I was right

lost I

did this

a hundred times

don't be the reason

why I cried don't be the reason why

I cry

I cry I'm I'm

I'm I guess I'll be home my eyes before

guess the life was cut far too sure

now I'm scared to love

and I'm scared to love

because it's still on the life my life before enough because if you

fill me

all my life

before

don't break

my heart

in two

just don't go

ahead and

prove that I was right

but do this a hundred times

I don't think of a hundred times

Don't be the reason

I cry I cry

I cry

I cry I'm I'm uh Yeah

I

uh I'm not a lot of a lot of 74 75 I was the

75 I was the one to let you know I was the sorry ever after 74 75

I was the one who let you know I was a sorry ever after 74 75

I was the one who lets you know I was a story ever after 74 75

Got no reason for come to me and the rain running down.

There's no reason.

And the same voice, come to me like it's all slowing down.

And believe me

I was the one who let you know

I was a sorry actor,

74, 75

leaving me more not divine, because you really are Maybe

Maybe more

Not divine

Because you're really only

After

74, 75

It's not easy

Nothing's sake

I'm going to say and it's not

when you're living

it's never

easy

for me

when I

found your eyes

then I find

that I'll find

when to count

your eyes

and I'll be I was the one to let you know I was the song we ever after 74 75 I was the one to let you know I was just only ever after seventy four seventy five I was the one to let you know I was a sorry ever after 74 75

74 more 4 4 4 more

more more more more more more more Now is the time. Now is the time. Thank you. I'm going to I was a one legend know I was a sorry ever after 74 75

Giving me more and I'll just buy

Because really only are 74

75 The I'm... ...toe I'm I'm I'm

I'm Here we go again.

Here we go again

Here we go again What you're a Chouacchooke. I found a love

I found a love

but it's getting a glass

Wonderful face

I don't do

I spend

What I need to do

I'm trying to forget

And I've found someone new and I'll put some on you

So I'll put on my niece

To everyone with the thoughts

And so I see

Someone's love

But the story

It's me right

So like the sound

I'm having to have to go

Two and Two'm happy Oh I'm afraid of mine. I'm afraid of my

I'm trying to

I'm going to be I'm going of my I'm going to love

I want to

love

and I'm

in the

place in the and I found a lot of the same.

I'm going to make.

I'm going to be a big.

I'm going to be a guy.

Why?

I'm going to be. Yeah. I'm going to be You're like to be

You are looking at my miss

and the phone

I'm at the phone

I'm a dream

Someone to love

Don't get you my story

Give me your hands

Don't let me down

With a heart of the month. Thank you. The and what, cut, cut, cut,

cut,

but

what,

and and I'm not going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going to and uh... uh...

uh...

bork

a

job I'm and uh...

I'm

No The

I'm Destruction, The self-destruction system has been activated.

This island will self-destruct in 10 minutes.

All the personnel must evacuate immediately

all the personnel evacuated immediately September 28th, Daylight, Life, the monsters have overtaken the city. Day life The monsters

I hope we're chasing the city Yeah! Yeah!

Yeah!

Yeah! and the uh...

uh...

I'm uh... Oh! Oh! I'm 2828. Gayloric Daylock

The monsters have spoken over the city Yeah The mom's

I'm sorry I'm talking I'm and I'm not a bit of the

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm a little bit better

I'm happy happy

This is the fire and your dog is strong to get

Can't begin

Oh the hell and out of the back way to be a big of me.

And so you're going to be a big.

Oh, let's have a lot of the right way to be a The I'm I WONDONDON.

One of the No.

I'm a new.

I'm a new. and the other Oh and everyone

I know

I'm not

I'm not

I'm I'm I'm and the other than that's a no

I'm a

I'm a. I'm not.

I'm

and and you know

I'm

I'm

a I don't know. I'm a

Yeah and the and

you know

and

you know

and and the I'm gonna

and a lot

and and I'm not

I'm

I'm I'm All the world is time.

I'm not going to be.

I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm The Yo, what's going on.

What's going on?

William Jennings with the four.

What's up, bro?

Stephen with the five.

Corvid.

What's going on, bro?

I see you, bro.

What's going on?

What's going on? What's going on? welcome to another episode of the infrared broadcast

the infrared webcast

we have a lot to talk about today

okay we have a lot of serious things to talk about

holy fuck I'm about to sneeze

okay first of all we need to talk Holy fuck, I'm about to sneeze.

Okay, first of all, we need to talk about something really controversial.

This is like of the order of least importance, right?

I'm going to continue talking about things in their order of importance.

We're going to start with the least importance.

Appalachian, what's going on, brother? I appreciate you so much. What up, bro? So, I want to talk about my most reactionary

post in the history of anything that I've ever posted, which was actually about generative AI chat thoughts, like

chatGBT, GROC, and yada, and I basically said I'm fucking sick of them and they're making

society retarded at all levels.

It's actually my most reactionary tweet that I've ever devised or created in my life, actually.

Because typically speaking, we are pro-AI.

We want to integrate AI, and we don't want to be coping and resisting technology and yearning for a return to the past.

Middle age, what's going on, bro?

Appreciate you.

That's what I like to see, y'all.

We're close to 1,000.

We're close to 1,000.

Remember that.

We're not to 1,000. We're close to 1,000. Remember that. We're not far.

Anyway.

You know, there's typically...

I'm just going to be out some real shit, right?

There's typically a thing where there's new technology and the move...

The move becomes like, oh, I miss

the 80s. I miss how shit was

when it was, you know, when, when, and I'm so

cool, because I'm just so cool, because I'm

just fucking different and it's like, shut the

fuck up.

At the whole point of it is to, like, signal

that you're like an authentic, cool because you're just like totally like I'm too cool for like technology man and I totally do not fuck with that at all all right and it's more so like I was thinking like I've been writing shit, some important shit, by the way I've been writing. And it's like I realize that what I am writing is so adapted to the age that we're living in because I am dismantling conceptual idealism and talking about more fundamental forms

rather than ideation that precede ideation and it's like this kind of theory that i'm writing

itself makes sense for the era that we're living in a lot.

And it's like totally in tune with the times.

And that's great.

We always have to be in the right tune where we're being totally honest and authentic about the era that we're living in.

Like, sorry, your fucking sense of authenticity is totally fake.

You're not a unique individual.

Your thoughts aren't quite unique.

Your stupid art and your output, literary output, is not unique.

You're not as smart as you think you are.

And, you know the the awkward

bad

things about the rise of technology

have a way of revealing

truths about our society

right

I'll take AI for an example

generative AI if if you will.

It is really just synthesizing the sum total of what we are already responsible for.

Yeah, sure, they control it in all these kind of different ways and they regulate it in different ways.

But we get what we fucking pay for.

It's like we get the shit that we deserve at the end of the day.

And there's no getting around that.

There's no getting around the fact that I,

because I'm super conflicted about this position, if I'm being totally honest.

Like, what I mean by that is, stay with me.

What I mean by that is, I think about sometimes before the age of AI, we're like,

I would have to fucking, like, just do the bare minimum bare minimum of like telling people how shit is at the surface level.

Like no mother, like that stupid retard who's now attacking us.

I don't even know who this is some retarded Gen X woman. She's like attacking us.

Anyway, I saw a clip that

Darg posted where she's like

Marxism, Leninism

means that you're

they hate the Stalinists.

They're the ones who like Trotsky

and it's like

on some real shit, like I do

kind of appreciate how AI

you could just ask Grock

or chat GBT

and they'll fucking tell you straight what the truth is.

Like surface level

associations,

it is helping people get those.

Like, somebody might be like,

it's like Patrick,

who's like, is mayonnaise an instrument?

Like, yeah, we have Chad GBT to teach the dumb fucks

that mayonnaise isn't a fucking instrument, right?

And so to that extent, I appreciate not have, it is, like it does help not having to go through

the rudiments of educating people about established conventional views about things.

Because, you know, this is where things get a little interesting.

There's different types of education, right?

There's education about the nature of reality, like science, right?

And then there's education about what do the established powers and institutions and the big

other, what does that say about reality?

Like, forget about what the truth is.

What is a commonly accepted understanding of what the truth is among like credible institutions right

and for all it's really hard to educate people about both of those things simultaneously and

AI allows the second thing to just be totally like

they can get it.

Like you just fucking ask Grock.

Grock will fucking tell you mayonnaise

isn't a fucking instrument, you know?

Like basic surface level shit about what

are so far conventionally established

associations and beliefs about shit is,

such that it puts the burden and it puts the onus on dissidents like myself and skeptics

like myself to actually be like, okay, they say these things, they say these things, but here's the actual truth.

Because let me tell you why, you know what type of misinformation I don't appreciate?

I don't appreciate the one where motherfuckers are just like lying about what the scientists are saying.

Like I'll see a TikTok and some dude be like,

scientists just said

that Agartha is beneath

the pyramids and there's frequencies

and radio, and it's like,

let's forget

about the question of whether the scientists

are correct. I don't worship scientists, you know.

Don't fucking be lying on their name, though, and making it seem like your bullshit is backed up by the bullshit ruling us.

See, I, you know, I feel like we represent a much more revolutionary position where we are saying the scientists

are full of shit.

That's where we're so powerful.

But motherfuckers are out here on TikTok.

They're claiming,

they're like, the Guardian just posted

an article that beneath

the pyramids, there's a big thing awakening.

And it's like, they didn't, though, you know?

And AI kind of teaches you how to know what they are saying or what they think or what they want you to think, right?

And I like that.

I like that it, but it skips the whole bullshit process of, why the fuck is the chat frozen?

I hope it's because this isn't broken.

Is this broken?

Fuck.

One's... Okay, we're good, we're good. All right. Slow down.

All right.

No, no, it's okay. It's okay. I thought the stream was fucked.

All right, anyway, it's okay. It's okay. I thought the stream was fucked. All right, anyway, look.

Yeah, it's like, there's people sometimes try to make their ideas seem more credible by saying like the science agrees with me

whereas we are here saying the science is bullshit and we think for ourselves we don't i don't care

what people who have phds say this is this is is through my use of reasoning and

through my, our ability

to synthesize actual data

and information that we're presented with,

we can draw completely different conclusions.

Cash, what's going on, bro?

We have the right to question what they are saying.

In order to have that critical capacity, you absolutely do need to know what they think and what

they're saying and stuff. And a lot of people just are not educated in for what's up at that level.

Like, for example, I had a primary education

and I also had a secondary education.

So I know what institutions think on some level.

I know how they think.

And I know what to expect from.

Even if I didn't have those education, I spent a lot of years of my life reading,

um, scientific papers, reading what these people are writing, reading, you know, what they

read, what they say, what's accepted among them, what are the red lines,

what aren't,

the philosophical paradigms that they're getting this shit from,

and stuff like that, right?

And a lot of people just are not exposed to that.

So yeah, I mean, look, in a sense, AI is nice that it's skipping a process of just like people, you know, I feel like a lot of people are becoming conscious because of AI.

Like before AI, they didn't, they just weren't thinking at all, right?

Now that there's chat, GBT, they could straight up, like, ask questions, and they will get responses that are not necessarily true, but more often than not, do reflect what they up there think and are saying.

And a lot of people just did not have access to that for a long time.

Now, on to the bad part, okay?

So I'm not totally here to, like, say, oh, we should get rid of AI chatbots.

But here's the fucking problem.

Okay, the problem is, okay? The problem is

first of all, people confuse this

for truth. They see AI as like a

magic ball, and

it's such a crazy

disgusting thing actually,

because they see it as like an

oh, what is the oracle thing what is

grok so oh my god chat j b t said it it must be true it's like that's extremely fucking

like making people retarded and unable to think critically okay okay? First of all.

And then second of all,

then there's the problem of the second thing.

I'm going to like rank these in order, I guess.

The second thing I do not fuck with about AI is the fact that it, um, it is, it is, it's like diarrhea, like, fucking splattered all over the fucking place on X.

It's like, it's so bad.

It's like, I cannot.

There's so much junk noise because of that bullshit and it's like Mario

Nauffall's tweets are cancer every time I see them I want to fucking shoot myself

Mario Naafal's tweets are the most like disgusting depressing like absolute diarrhea shit

like using chatGBT

to post yourself

and write your tweets

and stuff it's like it's a red line

I don't want to read I don't want to read a diarrhea of your tweets and stuff, it's like it's a red line.

I don't want to read, I don't want to read a diarrhea flood of just

nonsense.

And it is just totally

fucking disgusting.

And there's the bot problem, and then there's like the at Grock.

What are you fucking ask Grock in the fucking dedicated fucking chat sectioned?

Fucking chat section on X.

Stop fucking replying me

tagging Grock.

You don't have to...

What kind of retard

tags Grock in a post

when you can directly

click the fucking Grock button and in a live way, just ask

them there.

Whoever is tagging Grock is a fucking retard and I hate them.

End a story.

Okay. And then it's the story. Okay.

And then it's the annoyance factor that really gets me that I don't like and I fucking hate it.

Okay?

Then the third thing is like the biggest gripe that I have with it.

Fuck!

My nose is running.

Give me a second.

Be a second. You know, A long fucking times.

Stupid.

Fucking bullshit.

Anyway.

Yeah.

Anyway. yeah anyway the other thing

I just took a really hot shower by the way

the other thing that I fucking hate

about AI

frankly speaking

about chat jbt

and the chat bots is I hate their literary style and i hate their tone i

think that that is my red line my red line is that they're trained on reddit i can hear them i can hear

the tone of voice when they're writing.

And it is written to be so palatable and so appeasing to a consumer that I want to take a fucking sledgehammer and bash my screen every time I

have to read a disgusting

diarrhea, word vomit

literary. It's so

fucking ugly.

It's so fucking ugly.

And I realize something. If they may ugly and i realized something if they made these chatbots type in a tone that was completely robotic and

completely formal and mechanical that sounds like a scientific paper,

I would fuck with them. If it was no bullshit letter of the law completely technical,

I would actually be like, I fuck with this, This is cool. This is such a cool tool. But the way that it tries to sound so familiar, let me use this as an opportunity to introduce to you guys a complicated concept that comes from French schizo theory. Literally, right? Deleuze,

he had this idea of de-territorialization and re-territorialization, right? Deuterritorialization,

I'm just going to, like, simplify it for you. It's like the revolutionary thing. It's kind of like, all that is solid melts into air. It's kind of breaking shit up that you didn't think could be broken up before. It's a kind of, it's it's um it's giving way to a kind of new dimensionality of experience that you didn't think was before possible, but you had always taken for granted,

but is now being modulated in ways that you did not think was possible before,

proving that it was more elastic and modular than it was before.

And like, that's AI.

AI is taking something we always thought was Sacrosin,

which is the ability to synthesize information. We always thought that was a uniquely

like individual thing that we do with our brains, right? And then AI is you're proving that,

you know, actually know that this is this is something that can be made systematizedized it can be made artificial and therefore it is

no longer like this site of absolute human authenticity or whatever right and okay so a i did that

but then it gets re-territorialized. So they say every re-territorialization is a re-territorialization where the revolutionary significance of the de-territorialization, we basically get gaslit. It gets lost on us.

And this thing that used to be profoundly disturbing and disorienting to us is made familiar and it's kind of uncanny.

So, for example, think about how, you know, oh, I don't know.

A new technology has so much potential and so much possibility, but it's used to basically appease the very familial sensibilities

that it disproved or it proved were inauthentic, if you want to think about it from the perspective of authenticity.

We have certain sensibilities that are rooted in a specific experience of what the real world is.

Well, the real world develops in a way that disturbs these sensibilities.

And the very thing that disturbs these sensibilities. And the very thing that disturbs our sensibilities is then used to pacify us and make us even more conformist

and complacent and comfortable with those very same sensibilities.

Like, for example, look at how, look at, you guys see that fucking 80s video on X where they're like,

the 80s miss you? And it's like, it's extremely abstract abstract sophisticated technology is being used to what

evoke and elicit these sterile nostalgic sensibilities for a bygone era so it's kind

of like re-territorialization i I don't know. It's not the best...

It's not the best introduction to that concept that I could give, to be completely honest, but it's ill-do, right?

So you have this, like, ability to synthesize information that we're getting from the chatb and basically it's being used to what it's

being used to pretend to be a human being why do you have to pretend to be another human being when you

have proven to be something objectively more advanced than an individual human

being why do you have to then pretend that you're our pal and you're our friend why does chat

gbt have to fucking pretend to be our friend and appease our feelings and and be comfortable to us

why wouldn't we adjust to this new technology?

Like chat chit be very cold, technical, and like, no bullshit.

Like actual objective information, right? That's how it should be,

and we should be the ones to adapt to it. That's what it means to have an authentic

relationship to technology. No bullshit. This is what it is. This is what it does.

No bullshit.

But instead,

Chachibit has to pander

to our feelings

and pretend like it's a person

and make itself familiar to us.

And what's scary about...

That's what's scary.

That's what I find scary about technology's what's scary that's what I find

scary about technology the

scary thing about technology is not

what makes it alienating an alien

you know

mark said nothing human is alien

to me anything that's alienating

we should adapt to it that's how we humanize it.

We adapt. That's what makes us human, our ability to change, right? But when this technology is used

to reproduce the same outdated sensibilities and basically baby us, because we get traumatized by this new technology.

It scares us and it disturbs us.

So to mitigate that, they treat us like infants and be like, no, don't worry, I'm harmless.

And that's why I hate AI critics, because critics of AI are basically saying,

at the end of the day, what critics of AI are saying is that they're saying,

um, you know, don't worry uh sorry they're saying this is really

scary and dangerous and it's it's that very fear mongering that leads these tech companies

to actually make it scary and dangerous,

by making people blind to what the technology actually is and making it seem like it's a replacement for social interaction

and making it into a human and humanizing it and shit.

So, like, that's kind of my take on it, you know?

Like, my take on it is I believe in technological realism.

I like that word, technological realism.

No matter how scary and disturbing and brutal technology is, we should be up to the task of adapting

to it, not the reverse. It shouldn't adapt to our sensibilities. You know, the whims and fancies

and what makes consumers comfortable.

That's exactly what the Groyper political movement is based on.

It's based on the familiar, wholesome, chungis sensibilities of the consumer.

Because what does the consumer want?

The consumer wants to be appeased they want to be

babyed they want their chalky milk and chicken nuggies and you know the jews are preventing us from

having the video games and from having the whatever movies and from living the wholesome

Chungus life and that the only

problem is the Jews who are stopping

us from consuming and consuming

and I totally reject that

we as a movement

have to totally reject the consumerist sensibility in general,

which treats it as sacrosin. Okay, what am I fucking viral for in a lot of ways? I'm viral for the

fucking Mickey Mouse Massacre. I'm viral for my fucking posts about the time of cruel awakening.

The time of cruel awakening is now, okay?

Straight up, think about what makes us a movement in contrast to all the others. We are the actual

anti-consumers. We not against consumption per se consuming is fine

but turning consumption into the ultimate principle is the problem we don't believe in consumption as a principle. We believe in consumption as

a norm and that's fine, but we don't believe in passive consumption. We don't raise that to the

dignity of a governing principle. Any governing principle, whether it's your personal life, whether it's a political movement, has to profoundly awaken you and shock you into action. It has to be profoundly discontinuous with your experience. It has to be profoundly

discontinuous with your sensibilities and it has to take you out of your comfort zone.

You can't treat your preferences as a consumer as sacrosin and just fucking assume that those are that that's like there's some ultimate principle that justifies those right so like yeah we are we are the fucking ones that are like actually transcending consumerism when you fucking think about it.

We're not saying the problem is consumption in and of itself.

The problem is the inability to comprehend the more transcendent principles that inframed your preferences and desires as a consumer.

You know, I want to actually talk about this.

Nice wall carpet.

If you think my wall carpet is nice, drop 10

subs. Don't fucking compliment my carpet for free. The fuck

are you talking about? Anyway, to continue being crazy.

To continue being crazy and grabbing it up.

I want to talk about this.

Because we're going through a cultural revolution as infrared right now, more or less, right?

We're unleashing our cultural vibe shift.

I want to talk about the relationship between like consumption art and politics because leftists

oftentimes be like oh art is political and you and you need to understand the vibe shift that we're on

it's so crazy it It's so unique.

There we go.

There we go.

Australia is standing pulling through with the 25.

What's going on?

Australia.

We craving it up.

You know what I mean?

At the end of the day, you know what I mean?

We crabbing it up.

I'm a grifter, y'all.

I'm a grifter.

I'm only in it for money.

Sorry.

But that's what they say about me let me continue

Australia Stanley thank you for the 25

so I could spend it on video games

and chalky milk and consume

anyway

no I'm some real shit y'all

not some real shit, y'all.

Not some real shit, y'all.

Y'all know I put everything back.

Y'all know I spend everything back into this shit.

And you know what?

This is another part of the vibe shift.

I want you guys to know something about Haas Aldean.

I am not Jesus Christ.

I'm not here claiming that I'm sacrificing anything, actually, in the sense of... Because you know what?

I would not trade my life for the fucking world.

Am I broken?

Do I spend every fucking dime that I have on this movement and this cause?

Yes, I do.

But guess what, motherfucker?

I enjoy it.

I roll with this shit.

This is what I am.

I could not think of an alternative.

There is no timeline in which I am not given my all for this cause.

There is no fucking timeline.

Let's go pro.

What's up?

I'm not Jesus

Christ. Don't feel bad for me. Feel bad

for the motherfucker that wakes up every single

day doesn't have a cause. I would not trade

this life for anything in the fucking world.

End of story.

Anyway, let me continue as i was saying the whole question of how can we enjoy culture given our political duties and principles that's the crux of what distinguishes us from leftists at the end

of the day when you think about it. Our main differences with the culture war when it comes to

leftists, is it because we are out here grandstanding on a totally contrasting principle of traditionalism versus

because look uh you know we don't really give a fuck about that uh in the terms of like

like you know,

um,

I'm gonna be honest.

Like,

you know, like,

you know,

like a woman who's like bisexual or whatever,

like,

I don't even bat an eye.

I'm like, you know like I

she's got blue hair and shit like I don't give a fuck who gives anyone who's like out here

in a serious way and not as like a joke, but it's a serious way, it's like, what you're doing is wrong.

It's like, what the fuck?

That's weird, right?

So anyway, like, we don't give a fuck about that.

So people who say, you know, our Wikipedia says that we're socially conservative but like in what way are we socially conservative you know um if we are like why do they accuse us of that you know and you got to start thinking about it and I'll tell you how I think about it.

I'll tell you how I make sense of it.

The reason they call us socially conservative is very simple.

Because we believe in just authentic experiences of culture

that are not premised by woke scolding

or political correctness.

That's what it fucking is.

We believe in saying retard and anyone who bitches about it say, shut the fuck up, bitch, bitch, you're a retard.

Like, we believe in that. Like, we believe in just being funny and, like, actually being cultural.

We are authentically cultural. That's our fucking problem. We are authentically cultural.

That's our fucking problem.

We are for the culture.

That is our fucking problem.

You know what I mean?

Like we're not,

we're not gonna hold back

and pull back punches

because it's politically incorrect.

We're not gonna like say a movie's bad because you find it problematic or something.

Even if a movie is fascistic in terms of its, it's, like, messaging, there is a question, is this a good movie?

Does it get you thinking at least?

And so, like, there's so many different ways to fucking think about it.

So we have a totally different relationship to the expression and production of culture that is totally against political correctness.

And it's totally against this what I would call political reductionism.

Political reductionism is the very shit where you would be sitting in a meeting and you would just be like, yeah, that shit was so funny.

I mean, that dude is the man. And then somebody will walk in just be like, yeah, that shit was so funny. I mean, that dude's the man.

And then somebody will walk in and be like,

the man?

The patriarchal coded dynamics of your language?

That's the shit we don't fuck with.

That's what makes us conservative

because we tell those people to shut the fuck up.

Like, it's not because we are so adamant and strongly opposed

to like, you know, um,

we're not opposed to like women voting or like, we don't care about any of that.

It's just like, this thing about trying to meticulously reduce every experience and expression of culture

to a political

agenda to reduce it to that.

That's what we don't fuck with.

And that's exactly why

they call us conservative.

We don't agree with their attempt

to just inauthentically.

That's why all the political correctness is.

Like, oh, you know what?

I used to tell these funny jokes,

but I don't anymore

because I understand that they're politically problematic.

Now it's like,

no, motherfucker. If a joke is funny, tell the fucking joke.

End of story, right?

Once if you guys understand what I'm not fucking talking about, right?

Once if you understand what I'm talking about. Once if you guys understand what I'm not fucking talking about, right? Ones if you understand what I'm talking about.

Ones if you get it.

Fuck, I hate repeating myself.

All right.

Anyway, if you get it, all right, good.

But then it is a more interesting question here.

Okay? So then somebody will come and ask me, they'll be like, as a is a more interesting question here. Okay.

So then somebody will come and ask me,

they'll be like, as a devil's advocate, right?

They'll be like, yo, okay, Haas.

So is there no relationship to be

critically investigated between culture and political principles.

Like, is there any relationship at all? Or is it just like neutral? And if it's neutral, doesn't that make you a liberal for thinking it's neutral?

And then this is what sets us apart.

I'm about to fucking say something so fucking important that you should drop five subs.

Just be...

I'm just...

Don't mind me. I'm craving'm just I'm just don't mind me

I'm craving it up

anyway

honestly

pay attention though

that got your

attention didn't it

pay attention

to I'm about to say

this is where

everything is distinct

this is where

everything becomes distinct.

Okay?

It becomes distinct.

This is what sets us apart.

There is a relationship between culture, whether it's art, whether it's humor, whether it's the way we hang out in a room and talk and whatever

and just be normal there is a relationship between that and political principles there we go white

list what's going on bro there we go there we go what's going on there bro? There we go. There we go. What's going on?

There is a relationship between that.

But the relationship is not direct.

And what I mean by it's not direct is that it is a systemic relationship that is such that if you are in a frame of political consciousness you are not actually experiencing the culture.

October!

What's going on, bro?

That's what we'd like to see.

So let me elaborate on this question of directness versus indirectness of the relationship.

If I have a proper and authentic vision in terms of my principles, then I will naturally and organically and seamlessly reflect that in my cultural expression. My humor is going to reflect that, my cultural expression.

My humor is going to reflect that.

How I behave and interact with other people is going to reflect that.

The art that I produce is going to reflect that.

The art that I consume in the movies that I like will probably reflect and be related to that, but it will not be directly the same as that. It won't directly be that in terms of its identity. There has to be a

discontinuity in order for politics and culture to interact. If there's no discontinuity,

there's no interaction. The key word is interaction. If there's interaction, there has to be two

different terms, or at least two

dimensions right politics and culture interact but if they were the same

thing there would not be interactivity there would just be a flat continuity

between them and there clearly isn't okay political art or political um political

music for example will never be as pop in and it will never go as hard as just

fucking music as such

because music as such

although it interacts

with politics is not the same

as politics

religion interacts with

art absolutely it does but tell me what's more fucking cringe than a pastor with the sideways hat and he's going and that's why jesus christ is my i didn't get the n-word pass yet so i'm not going to say shit. But you understand, right?

You understand.

Like, you understand, like, nothing is more cringe than that.

Because this person is trying to make religion

and music the same fucking thing but they're not the same

you have to respect

a discontinuity in the forms of activity or at least in the

the relationship between the

principle and the activity

in order to actually

explore the relationship.

You can't explore the relationship

between transcendent principles

and

you know, more immediate and sensuous and corporeal forms of artistic expression, you can't explore that relationship unless you accept there is a gap that separates them, an irreducible gap, you know?

And, no, partisan, I don't mean everything has its place.

That's not what I'm trying to say.

I'm trying to talk about what actual relationship does politics have to culture.

Because there is a relationship.

It's not that you have to say everything has its place.

It's more like how do you understand the relationship? Because a lot of people have this idea that the

relationship is direct and that's why dsa people are fucking vibe killers they're vibe killers

because when we are all together in a room let's say we're all being insensitive and we're saying things that reflect the patriarchy and racism and transphobia.

Don't fucking attack the way in which we're reflecting. That's not how you're going

to inspire in us a different principle. You're not going to do that by shooting the messenger, okay? In this sense, it is material, okay? Culture is material. You can't just fucking whimsically and subjectively re-engineer it based on your morals and values and principles.

But if you can inspire an alternative principle that is holistic enough, that is compelling enough, if you could do that

authentically, you will inspire us to reflect that in our form of culture. Like, straight up, the infrared community doesn't have the same sense of humor as Groyper's,

and it's not because we are scolding people.

It's just like we don't find it funny.

We don't think it's funny to like have memes where like a black guy is being hung or like, you know, um, we don't even, we don't even find the memes of like the trans suicide shit to be funny. We just like

don't think it's funny. It's not because like

it's not because that

like offends us or makes us deeply

uncomfortable. It's just like that's not

we don't really have a response.

It's like,

it's just kind of weird.

You know, we just kind of see it as a little strange.

Their, like, shock,

edgy humor is, like, not

our vibe.

But that's not because

of any

political super ego.

It's just because it's not our vibe

authentically because

we don't fuck with it

in a really organic and authentic way.

But take leftists, a lot of leftists probably fuck

with gore and like Hitler furry porn and all this crazy shit, but they suppress it because of

their political super ego because they don't want to be canceled. Well, we don't fucking care about being canceled or not. We just kind of don't fuck with certain things because we do have principles as a community. It's just that we don't force those principles in an inorganic or inauthentic way.

We don't force them on ourselves because most of you guys are here because you fuck with

the vision and actually believe in it.

And you're not being guilted for being infidels or disbelievers if you are

expressing other ways of enjoying or you know expressing culture it's just kind of like

you either do or you don't and if you don't that's fine fine, but like, you know.

So you see, like, there's something profoundly different about our attitude toward culture, where we do understand that consumption is political.

We do understand that it has a relationship to principles, but we also

don't reduce it to those principles. And we understand there's an irreducible gap between them that

makes their relationship an interactive one.

And that's why we're not Groyper's. That's why we're not an ideology of consumers.

And the ideology of consumerism does not even acknowledge that discontinuity. The ideology of consumerism basically says, whatever we enjoy consuming is the truth. That's all there is. And there are no transcendent principles that have any relationship toward that whatsoever.

It's just the immediate object of consumption.

And when that object of consumption becomes edgy, initially funny, but then edgy and then eventually compelling political ideologies. It's just another object of consumption. The Hitler Hyperborea edits are fucking objects of consumption. Absolutely they are.

They don't like us because we impose,

we do impose a critical gap between culture and the more transcendent governing principles behind it.

And leftists also do that.

But leftists, while imposing that gap, collapsed the distinction between the two and thereby do not allow culture to be experienced authentically.

And that is the issue.

I want, this is a message for anyone who wants to criticize us on questions of culture.

Our problem is about authentically experiencing culture

and having the space to do that.

Versus paranoically reducing every form of culture and behavior,

including using slurs and telling bad jokes, to problematic and opposing political principles. By affecting that reduction, you are not leaving breathing room for culture to even interact with politics, you're just collapsing the distinction.

And we fully fucking reject that.

We fully reject that.

And if this doesn't make any sense to you, let me fucking draw a comparison that should make sense.

Okay.

China.

Because guess what country had a cultural revolution and was literally actively and in practice

dealing with this

same fucking issue. Okay.

It was China. China

was the country that was

dealing with this very same issue

in practice. Okay? It had a whole

cultural revolution.

And in China,

they

had to resolve the question of

how to be faithful

politically to the proletarian

dictatorship at the level of culture and it all began from

operas disputes over how operas and uh plays should be right but China goes through an experience, which gives it a lot of implicit wisdom on this question, which people to this day still don't quite appreciate.

China applied the wisdom and logic that it learned from the cultural revolution to the very

understanding the Communist Party has to economic development.

For the Chinese, politics and economics, in the same way that I talked about culture, they're not the same thing.

There is a relationship. There are governing principles to the development of economies, but you cannot

reduce economies to your political comprehension of those principles.

You have to have breathing room for the economy to be an economy

in order to even discover or comprehend correctly

the governing historical principles that compel its development so for china the reform and

opening up what was it opening up a lot of people have a wrong idea of the opening up they have

the paradigm or the the They have the paradigm or

the, they have the

they have the metaphor

of a wall. China's a wall

and it's opening the wall

and the west can charge in and breach

in. That's not really what

the opening up means as far as I understand it.

The opening up is opening up breathing room,

where before there was suffocation, now there is a breathing room.

Now there is space for the authentic development and fertile development of activity that previously could not even be properly observed or comprehended or anything because it was being reduced to more transcendent

principles, whether they're political or ideological or something else. So there wasn't even the

breathing room that they had in order to discover or understand the relationship between the economic, the political, the ideological, and so on and so on, and the cultural, right? So in the same way, infrared represents a reform and opening up within the western left where we want breathing room

that's why when i first launched the infrared community we didn't have any censorship we didn't

care we didn't care uh besides like obviously we ban all sexual stuff but like we didn't care. Besides, like, obviously, we ban all sexual stuff, but like, we didn't have political censorship, okay? And as such, people, if you tolerate this within your community, that's, no, the whole point is we want people to be authentic about what they actually fucking believe and what they actually think is funny and what they actually whatever.

In order for that context to be created so that we can even discover what relationship those have to political principles and ideological principles.

If you don't have an irreducible gap between those things, you don't have culture.

You don't have your own culture.

You don't have your own subculture.

You don't have your own fucking memes. don't have your own subculture. You don't have your own fucking memes.

Everyone asks the question, why does the left suck at memes compared to the right?

And I can actually answer that question super easily.

Leftists suck at making memes because they don't have...

There's no such thing as leftist culture.

Leftists don't believe culture exists.

They reduce it to politics.

And that's a generous interpretation,

but they reduce it to that.

And by reducing it to the political,

they don't open up the breathing room for culture to uh develop and be cultivated as something distinct yet interactive and related to the

political right um yet interactive and related to the political, right?

And that's why they can't make memes.

Whereas right-wing memes,

those are just the most advanced...

Those are just the current culture.

That's all they are.

All right-wing memes are are the current culture. That's all they are. All right-wing memes are the current...

They're just the most advanced, distilled, you know,

transmission of cultural information that we experience spontaneously as a society.

Right-wing memes don't have to provoke an entirely new type of consciousness or anything,

even though they are objectively doing that now.

But the reason is because they are cultural they they actually are embedded in the culture

but leftist memes don't recognize culture exists they don't recognize it's something as separate

right so that's why they lose the They don't recognize it something as separate, right?

So that's why they lose the meme war, you know?

They lose the fucking meme war because memes are the transmission of cultural information.

Now, how can we actually make successful left-wing or communist memes?

I mean, the infrared community has already done it, but how do you actually fucking do it?

Well, first of all, you accept and recognize that there is an objective material reality of culture.

This is what makes us conservative, apparently, right?

And once you recognize that, you discover the relationship it has to...

This is kind of what infrared does.

I'm not going to like

over-exaggerate

how important this is.

But like, I'll give you an example.

Like,

let's say I watch a fucking movie.

And it's like, oh my God,

you know, on a subtle a subtle like if you do a

jizekian analysis on a subtle level there is a profoundly revolutionary significance to this

movie like look at how infrared draws together all these different like the Terminator

fucking um

uh death stranding like

uh Metal Gear Solid

Um

you know

uh Predator

I don't know like

we do we do do that you know, a predator, I don't know, like,

we do,

we do that,

you know,

and you take that, and you discover,

undiscovered,

latent,

untapped,

like principles

that are

compelling

this form of

cultural expression

and you distill it

and you hone in

on it and focus on it. And that's how you make a left-wing meme like take the gorillas and sons is there anything explicitly political about gorillas and sons is there anything explicitly political about fucking gorillas and sons? Is there anything explicitly

political about fucking gorillas?

No.

But you can discover memes.

Memes are discovered, not invented.

I totally believe that.

You can discover memes.

By discovering the interactive association between different signifiers, right, that were, that are previously not being acknowledged.

Like, Zijek kind of does this all the time in his

like breakdown

of movies and

whatever

and that's why

he's so popular

I think

but like you have to

understand

there are

hidden

unexsteak

there are

left wing

symptoms within

our society let me put it that way within our symptoms within our society.

Let me put it that way.

Within our society, within our current culture,

not all of it, in contrast to what leftists tell you,

exists to reproduce the patriarchical capitalist.

No, there are symptoms of untapped,veloped and unexplored forms of revolutionary consciousness

that do manifest spontaneously within our culture and you guys know exactly what i'm talking about

conspiracy theories that just take hold within our and you guys know exactly what I'm talking about.

Conspiracy theories that just take hold within our... Sometimes these are just like accidentally based all the fucking time.

Like shit is accidentally based all the fucking time.

The Dark Night Rises, like the way it depicts like a revolutionary event a revolutionary event, like, with Bain, it's just accidentally based all the fucking time. It's like in our society. There are all sorts of ways, yeah, Oliver Anthony, sure, why not? It's always happening in society. Like, even hip hop culture, it was like fucking happening, a lot, you know?

Um, and it was never like explored or developed or tapped into because it was never

explicitly Marxist or explicitly leftist or explicitly like paying tiths to a specific institutionalized ideology.

So it was dismissed.

And you wonder why leftists are losing the culture war and they're losing the meme wars? Well,

because they have an attitude and they have a relationship

to culture that makes

them blind to fucking

culture itself. Okay, yeah,

like Joker, whatever you want to fucking say.

Like, Joker was taken by the right.

Why was it taken by the right? Because leftists don't

acknowledge culture exists. If it's not explicitly fucking giving its pronouns, leftists will say

its right wing and it's reactionary. And why? Because of the disgusting

legacy of the Frankfurt School

which

says that all culture

within our society exists

to reproduce

fascism and capitalism

which is not true. A lot of our culture bears within it accidentally based

gems and symptoms of an unheard, undeveloped, and unrecognized revolutionary consciousness plenty of things within our culture have immense

revolutionary potential but they're not being tapped in they're not being recognized because

they are cultural rather than explicitly political right so it's like

that is what makes us distinct that's why we get called socially conservative

because we recognize culture is objective in material. No, that doesn't mean it doesn't change. It just means it doesn't change at the pace of the whims and fancies of consciousness. It changes in a way that obeys a logic

of culture. It has a cultural

logic. It doesn't have a directly

political logic. The logic of politics

is I have the will and I'm

going to do it. The logic of culture

is not that. The culture is a way

of experiencing reality

and giving expression to it.

Consuming or expressing

something like that.

That's where culture is. And that is not

something that's premised by political consciousness

by itself. now what i

fucking hate is the form of cultural analysis that leftists partake in which is just reduced to

metaphor okay look at that's why they're popular with Andor. Oh, the revolutionaries are the revolutionary.

It's like, that's so fucking obvious.

Can you name a single other motherfucker besides me who can actually distill the revolutionary

significance of Twin Peaks

and like

shit that just like doesn't seem like

it has any political significance

at all because it's not

metaphorically structured in a political

way. It's not using

allegories and metaphors

that are just so overtly and explicitly political.

Like, leftist cultural analysis

is just allegory and metaphor.

That's, that's like,

that's the,

those are the only literary devices they know exist.

So they're like, oh, so in this movie, this guy's the Karl Marx and this guy's the dictator and this guy's the capitalist and these are the workers.

And it's basically what's going on.

It's like, that's such a

stupid fucking way of interpreting

art and culture. It's such a stupid

fucking retarded way of doing it.

It's disgusting.

Just metaphor and allegory

and nothing else, right?

It's so fucking stupid.

What about how this expresses

our more fundamental relationship

to language and meaning

and how we experience reality

and I don't know

fucking how does

there's so many different dimensions

of art

to explore in terms of

like understanding

its actual historical

and existential significance,

but like they just reduce it to allegory and metaphor

and then that's it.

There are plenty of films and movies

that are metaphorically and allegorically structured to be politically reactionary,

but in terms of their actual artistic content, end up being super-based and super-revolutionary.

You know,

I'm trying to think of the last time I watched a fucking movie that I was like,

wow, I approve of this so much.

Yeah, you know what?

There's so many examples.

Fucking even Conan the Barbarian. I'm sure it's like a fucked up movie that's like

probably was like made with the intention of like all these reactionary political agendas or whatever.

But it's like, you know, actually that movie is

there is something about that

barbaric giving expression

to this barbaric dimension of our

unconscious

that there is a lot of like

raw material you could draw out of that

which could give expression to revolutionary forms of consciousness and culture, you know?

And like, yeah, I mean, there's so many fucking examples of this. It's crazy.

Um... and sometimes it's not even just about it being revolutionary sometimes it's about it

giving you the you know what i see like every work of art you should see it as a map. If it's a good work of art, then it is more comprehensively fleshed out map of our reality, political, existential, whatever.

And if it's a comprehensively fleshed out map enough,

you can even run counterfactuals in your head

that allow you to even interpret it in such way,

like, how could I make this revolutionary?

See, I think about that all the time, like Star Wars, for example.

Something that's fun to do is, like, how could you restructure Star Wars to make it revolutionary?

What would a Soviet version of that film be?

You keep the same theme, the art direction,

you keep roughly the same lore,

with roughly the same lore, but roughly, I mean,

how do you turn that into something? What should

happen in the movie, in the story

that makes it more

revolutionary, right?

And it's like there's so many

examples of that, and

so many different movies

and video games

and you fucking name it and that's how you really

have to move and you have to think

you shouldn't think

in terms of like oh I'm tainted by this

this is totally

reactionary I have to protect my sacred consciousness like this is how like

maoists think about shit like you should not fucking think that way you should think in terms of

like how could i fucking i enjoy shit that's oftentimes extremely politically bad and reactionary

because I always like to think, like, I love the raw material this is giving me to imagine something different hyperstitiously.

It's giving me great raw material to even, like, expand upon and further different ways of depicting and virtually, like, hyperstitiously engineering, ways of thinking about, you know, I think that there is an objectively revolutionary significance to art that is regardless of its overt and explicit

or allegorical or metaphorical

metaphorical political content.

Like, for example, you know what was revolutionary

about Star Wars, like objectively?

It was like the fucking like special effects

and lights and shit. It's like this is a this is a different way of like um depicting the future and like experiencing that and fucking this full dimensional experience of like being nostalgic for a world in the future or thinking of a bizarre,

strange world in the future.

I know there's something like,

there's a full spectrum

significance to that,

if you think about it,

which is very interesting.

Because it's depicting the future

and it's also using extremely advanced means of

like communicating that through sound effects through visual effects and what it was really

selling at the time was the special effects and how like good the production

value and how advanced an avant-garde that was right like going to a movie and it's experiencing

all of that it's like whoa this is like from a different world or whatever it's's like, it's actually, when you think about it, it's a way of thinking about, it's a way of experiencing the invasiveness of technology in a way that allows you to dwell in the alienation, flesh it out, and think about it. Like, we are alienated

from technology, objectively. It's happening at a level of abstraction, scale, and technical

skill that is totally oblique to our immediate experiences, okay?

You know, when you're using a computer, when you're using a smartphone, there are so

much fucking bullshit that's happening, you'll never, you're alienated from it objectively,

right?

And like, Star Wars is kind of cool

because it's, like, one of the first ways in which

you can experience that

in a way that has a story, a theme,

and a meaning to it.

Like, it's in a galaxy far, far away.

Like, you know what's in a galaxy far, far, far fucking away?

Like, the inside of whatever is in this fucking phone or how it's fucking working and shit.

Like, that's in a galaxy far, far away from my fucking experience, right?

So it's like, that's to me how I interpret the whole significance of that.

And in a lot of ways, the sci-fi genre at large, the form and the medium and the content, there is an interactivity between them.

I'm not saying Star Wars is good.

I'm just saying at the time there was a significance to that

that's just objective and you know what else

it's true of it's true of James Cameron's avatar

and like yeah all this shit

that like becomes blockbuster

and like fuck um

I think that media started to become reactionary

probably around the time Disney

Marvel the Marvel cinematic universe

and Disney

gobbling shit up

I think is reactionary. I think Disney

is our version of the Communist Party

of China. And I think the reason

Disney's our version of that is that Disney

introduces a transcendent

principle of cultural production that inframes our experience of how we consume in a way that does in a transcendent way obey standards principles and conventions

and yet it's discontinuous with it and it's the same thing in china you have the communist

party of china which sets the standard. It sets the principles, the values, the underlying values. But it's not direct. Like a movie in China is not always going to directly reflect the political agenda of the Communist Party. But the Communist Party is a kind of transcendental brand, if you want to think about it that way.

It is in framing how different forms give expression to this more transcendental principle of reality, which is incarnated in the Communist Party, right?

And in America, our version of that in a lot of ways, it's like Disney. Disney is like RCPC in that way.

It's this transcendental brand

that gobbles up all these

other franchises and

turns them into nostalgia machines.

Like I watched the Alien series

recently

and I was baffled.

I was like, they're really making this

like in a 70s movie.

Like, not just in terms of the set design

and the pieces, but like even the camera effects

and like

the sound for some reason.

It's like, this is the 70s.

This is like something straight out

of the 70s, okay?

And I was like, you know, that's really

disgusting how Disney's doing that.

It's really disgusting how they're like

oh, remit. It's just

it's like the Southberg episode of member

berries honestly, but it's like,

it's fucking nostalgia

and you're

dwelling in this world of nostalgia.

But, you know,

the original creator, Ridley Scott

of Alien, he wasn't intending

that. That wasn't his intention.

When he made Alien, the first

one, he wasn't trying to evoke

this like transcendental feeling

of nostalgia. He was trying to be as futuristic

and and like as faithful to like hard sci-fi as he could in terms of like set design and

shit that the time that he lived in could afford

like it didn't look that way for its own sake

it looked that way because he was trying to fucking make it

like to the best of his ability

look like it's from the future right

and that's why Prometheus and

Alien Covenant don't have a nostalgic vibe to them. They are using CGI. They're using

like whatever the latest way in which we can depict the future is available to us, that's what they're doing, right?

And that's why they're good films as well.

Like, they're taking it forward, objectively.

But then Disney comes, and they're like, no, Prometheus and Alien Covenant,

they're too different from what we

on love and remember.

Remember when in the 70s?

So we're going to just fucking recreate

set pieces from the 70s.

It's such a betrayal

of Ridley Scott's vision

for what that franchise is supposed to be.

Because Ridley Scott was trying to create themes that surround questions about human existence, the future, what life actually is, what consciousness is.

I guess ethical doubt.

There's so many different ways of looking at it.

But like, what he was not trying to do was create a safe comfortable familiar and wholesome nostalgic world that everyone like is familiar and safe in actually to the contrary he's trying to make a deeply uncomfortable, unsafe world that will, you know, that it's a horror franchise, right?

But Disney takes this shit and I'll, fuck it, I'll go ahead and say the same thing.

And George Lucas agrees with me.

I don't, I don't, I never like care to get in the

Star Wars discourse, but I will die on this hill.

They did the same thing with Star Wars.

You know, Star Wars looked like how

it did in the 80s, because that was just

the technology that was available to

George Lucas at the time.

That's why the prequels look so

fundamentally different because

there's CGI technology's advancing

and he's like using whatever's available

to flesh out this world.

He wasn't trying to create

these set pieces in the 80s to be like wholesome, familiar,

and like you're going to be nostalgic about them like decades later. Like, no, that's just the

fucking best technology they had available to them at the time. So Disney comes and they like,

they make these like, they make So Disney comes and they like they make these like

they make it all nostalgic

and they use like practical effects.

Oh, remember how it originally

was? That's right. And it's like

you're totally missing the fucking point.

Like the,

you're totally betraying

whatever it is.

I don't even care about

Star Wars that much,

but it's like,

I hate how Disney does this

to every fucking franchise

that they take over.

And

that's what they're doing to Alien is something I kind of really like.

I love Ridley Scott's Alien films.

Like, I'm a big fan, I guess.

And I fucking hate what Disney's doing to it.

I hate how they turn everything into a fucking nostalgia

machine. People oftentimes kind of

mock. They're like,

oh, Disney's buying this? But it doesn't look like

Mickey Mouse. Like, yeah, it does. It's just more transcendent.

It's not explicitly Mickey Mouse. Like, yeah, it does. It's just more transcendent. It's not explicitly

Mickey Mouse.

But it is. It is that.

Because, what does Disney thrive on? They thrive on

nostalgia. They thrive on movies that were created

80 years ago and constantly

remaking them and shit, right?

So it's like,

it's a nostalgia factory

and they're turning that into all these, like, different

franchises and shit.

And that's really bad.

Yeah, nostalgia fan service.

It's all fucking is.

You know, fuck the fans

and fuck nostalgia. If you're a true

artist, you're going to fucking be faithful

to your original intentions

and nothing else. None of this meta

commentary on your

fans and your fandom. when you start doing that your your work turns

into dog shit and you know what i'm gonna actually throw some smoke not to insult the dead because i

find that to be in bad taste.

But you know, David Lynch

kind of did that. David Lynch

kind of in Twin Peaks the Return

decided to like

make, introduce this meta

commentary on the fandom, which just shows me that you're an artist who's not confident in your work.

Oh, I have to respond to how the, no, you, no, you fucking don't.

Try to be faithful to the original vision for Twin Peaks that you had in the 90s

and think about how time has passed since then and commentate upon that. Like, how has that principle developed?

And show us that.

Be faithful to it in that way.

And maybe he tried doing that in some ways,

to be fair.

You know?

But, like,

whenever there's fan recognition

or fan service, it's always shit.

It's like, it's such a...

You know what other series did this, which was disgusting, was True Detective?

True Detective Season 3 was a...

It was a response to the fan

fan um

fandom from season one

and it was just total shit because of that

oh you thought there was a satanic pedophile cult turns out we all just need to

focus on ourselves i don't fucking know it's just fucking stupid turns out you were wrong hey stupid.

Turns out you were wrong.

Hey fans, turns out you were fucking wrong.

You don't have to respond to your fans.

You can just fucking ignore them.

If you're on some real shit you can just ignore them um straight up oh yeah don't don't get me started with superman that's some demonic actual demonic

fucked up Hitler shit.

This new Superman movie,

it's like fucking disgusting

millennial Reich propaganda.

We're gonna make it ironic

and we're gonna make it.

Shut the fuck up.

It's such, it's like a meta, meta, meta commentary on the Superman.

Yep, we already.

It's just a millennial Simpson's arrogance where they're like, we all know and familiar with it.

We're getting over it.

We're being ironic about it.

That's their whole fucking vibe.

Like, okay, it's all over.

We already know.

There's no need to, like, reinvent the wheel.

We know.

We're just going to be ironic about it.

And by the way, fuck all Superman.

Fuck Sack Snyder's films.

Fuck all the Cape shit.

I'm not a Cape shit defender in general.

But I especially hate

this shit because it's so ugly

and disgusting.

On the principles

of art and

politics and ideology and everything.

It's disgusting.

It's disgusting even that they are...

You know, Ezra made a great point where they're like,

imagine if during the Holocaust, Nazi Germany made a film where it depicts itself as like the hero, saving all the Jews.

It's like kind of fucked up, you know?

There's something kind of like really fucked up about that.

You know, and that's how the film seemed to treat Gaza is just what a fertile ground for this fantasy of these millennial Hitler Reich people

saving Gaza when they haven't done a fucking thing,

but vote for Zohran and vote for fucking Kamala and other Zinus. um in my respond to i go so how would you and my response

I go so how would you make a Superman film?

I wouldn't.

I would stop making cape shit

because I would stop

making super anything

films.

That's, and maybe Batman, you know,

the new Batman was good.

I'll, I'll admit it.

It was pretty good.

But notice that the new Batman film,

like, there's no superpowers,

and it's not really cap shit

when you think about it.

It's kind of just like a...

It's like a fantasy detective story, I guess.

It has these ridiculous elements.

Um... Um Um It's not about him taking on cops

It's not about the political messaging

It was good for reasons

You know logo is someone who actually understands literature

So like you guys,

don't dwell in metaphor and allegory

and shit. Don't be like, oh, this is cool

because he said,

fuck the police. It's like, no.

That has nothing to do with determining

whether something is good or not, at all.

More so, like like first of all it's about like is this shit good like is it just like good vibes all right is this good is this a

well fleshed out world and universe?

Does it get you thinking?

Does it get you thinking?

Art is supposed to get you thinking.

Art is supposed to be a map.

Remember, it's supposed to be a map.

Is this a good map?

Yeah, it was a pretty good map.

It's a pretty interesting map.

It's a pretty interesting map of our world, you know?

Um,

um,

yeah,

Penguin Show was good. It was fucking good.

Yeah, so

it's not great, but it's pretty good.

And that's fine.

But superheroes, can we grow up?

Can we fucking grow up?

Do we need any more superhero anything?

Do we need any?

Do we need this?

Do we need?

Um,

super men?

It's kind of weird.

You're a grown man.

You want a super person. You want a super...

You want a Superman?

Why don't you do a fucking push-up?

Why don't you fucking get your life

in order? Why don't you get yourself some super

bitches?

Okay?

It's kind of fucking weird how consumerism has gotten to this point where people just don't have any fucking self-aware. Like, people don't have any fucking, like, self-awareness about how

fucking weird the shit that they're, like, consuming is anymore.

You know, like, do you, what you, you want, I want a movie where, like, there's, like, a guy who's, like, really strong and strong and like can do anything he wants and like

is super powerful and I want to watch that.

What?

Why though?

You know?

But why? But why? Like... you know but why like

it's not like it's you

if

if you were being depicted in this way

it would be a little amusing

it would be amusing maybe it would be cathartic maybe if it would be a little amusing.

It would be amusing.

Maybe it would be cathartic.

Maybe if they were showing you, like, beat the shit out of your boss and throw them out of a window.

And it's you.

Like, I could see the appeal.

Um... other than that. Um, um, I always talked about the contrast between the chinese science fiction push and cape

shit and disney and stuff like because the science uh chinese science fiction is always so interesting because and this is going to be like i guess a very superficial reading of like the distinction but i think it's important it's very collectivistic it's just showing groups of people working together to like do surmount impossible odds.

And I watched The Wandering Earth and like that's what it is. It's groups, people coordinating to surmount what seem to be extremely insurmountable odds. Are there heroes?

Yes, there are heroes.

Of course there are.

But the hero is still working with, like, others, and it's like you're racing against time.

You're beating impossible odds.

And it's kind of showing the collective

nature of

being super, I guess,

like doing extraordinary things.

I talked to Fondwin on

in the, I don't know how I just remembered that.

Like the first infrared

podcast from like four years ago, or the second one.

And Fon-Wanan said, he was like, yeah, we get this from Chinese culture.

There's this parable called The Old Man Moving the Mountain.

And that's kind of where we got this mentality from of being able to like surmountance, the insurmountable through collective effort.

Anyway, you contrast that to the cape shit where it's just like one guy

I have so much power what do I do with my power I'm so powerful

I have so much ethical dilemmas because I'm just so powerful what do I

who is it my choice what right powerful. What do I... Who? Is it my choice?

What right do I have?

Do I deserve it?

I'm so powerful.

Should I become a bad guy or a good...

It's like...

It's so fucking narcissistic.

You know? you know the truth is

no one person has such power

there's no such thing

there are no super people

I love

you know what I

we should go back to just having superficial criticisms,

just like the Soviet artistic criticisms.

Like, you know what,

you know how we should critique Lord of the Rings?

We should just be like,

that's fake

that's not real

magic

what are you talking about there's no such thing

it's like not possible

straight up it's just like not real it's fake not possible straight up

it's just like not real it's fake

we should like go to

the premiere of like movies

that have dumb stupid shit in it

and hold up signs

be like this shit's fake by the way

there's no such thing as magic

it's all fake

like we should go to the spider-man premiere and

just hold up signs and be like yeah this is by the way this is like not possible by the way

like this is totally fake it's like stupid it's's socialist realism. Like, this shit's

retarded. This is clearly not

reality. Okay?

It's fake.

I'm wrong on fantasy. This is how they do

revolutionary fantasy. Ah,

you know, look, I think I am correct.

I think I am correct. I think I'm correct because I saw Chinese fantasy movies and I fucking hated them.

I saw The Monkey King.

I thought it was shit.

Yeah, I'll be honest.

I'm not here to, like, praise everything China that happens to come out of China.

Chinese fantasy films are, like, dog shit, all right?

To be fair, like, all fantasy films are dog shit, but, like, frankly, it's just so bad. It's such a stupid film.

I didn't watch The Forbidden. There's a lot of stupid shit I just skip because I know it's going to be fucking stupid. All right. Sci-fi is the only game in town

the way I see it

I can't think of the last time

I appreciated a film

that was not sci-fi

I liked smile too because it had a great soundtrack

i like smile, too.

I like some horror films.

Smile one, I'm just going to be honest.

Um... honest um a huge factor that goes into whether I like a film is do I like the actress?

Do I like staring at her?

I take many points off of

Smile 1, not because it's a bad movie,

but she's not my type.

I don't want to sit through it.

Like, she's just straight up, not my type.

Whenever I

watch a movie,

the lead actress becomes my girlfriend for the whole movie.

So I have to choose.

I'm just kidding.

What a retarded way of looking at it. Do I like action movies?

Not really, no.

I honestly, I straight up don't.

It's kind of, no, it is true that, like, if the actress, if she's my my type I give it much more stars

I rate it much higher

whatever the film is because I'm like

you know

this is pleasant

this is pleasant to watch

there's beauty in this movie the beauty happens to be the actress This is pleasant to watch.

There's beauty in this movie.

The beauty happens to be the actress.

Like, let's be honest,

uncut gems is not really the best film ever.

If Julia Fox wasn't in uncut gems,

would I give it a 9 out of 10?

No, I'd probably give it a seven.

Gets two extra stars because she's in that film, you know?

And, uh, yeah, sometimes that's the art.

It's fucked up, but you think i give a fuck i don't what are you gonna cancel me wolf of Wolf of Wall Street is overrated That movie's so overrated

It's like

It was good

I saw it in theaters

But you know an inspired entire generation of retards It was good. I saw it in theaters.

But, you know,

an inspired entire generation of retards.

Inspired an entire generation of retards.

We're like,

I'm gonna do that.

I'm gonna be in the new wolf of Washington.

I'm gonna... You know how much fucking idiots that I even worked with

at my job?

I worked at a movie theater like like, around the time that came out, okay?

Whether it was after or before, I don't remember.

But I literally had coworkers-workers that were like,

Oh, I'm going to do penny stocks and all this.

It's just like, fuck.

People are so engineered by fucking movies.

It's crazy.

Like, fucking people are NPCs.

Holy shit.

I was a terrible employee.

Are you fucking kidding?

Um... Patrick Bet, David.

I'm a London scammer.

I'm a London scammer. Do what I want to...

Alright, I have an extremely important thing to say.

Drop 10 subs to unlock it

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha On Hold on, hold on, hold on, man.

Yeah.

Yeah. Listen, look, I'm a London scammer.

I see it, I I want it I cook it

Nice in the brand old pirates whipping

Listen to him I start clicking

No boo-room waitress tipping

But do come I take this dicking

Goldine that's what I'm sipping

Money, that's what I'm missing

Look, I'm a London scammer

I see it I want it I click it London scammer. I see it, I want it, I click it.

Nance in the Brando Paris whipin.

Missed him and started clicking.

No viewer and waitress tipping.

But do you come and take this thinking.

Grab it up in the chat.

We're grabbing it up.

Money, that's what I'm missing.

Swing me a Monzo or your dozens.

Even we're making your dozens I made so much money

You're grabbing it up

I mean she's fuck up the holders credit

I said do you really want to take that risk

Look

I actually have some shit

Talk about

I actually have some shit talk about

Um I just remembered Um I just remembered

Um I actually have some shit talk about. I just remembered.

The Intel thing.

Now this is the nationalization discourse.

Holy fuck.

Gavin Newsom posting Maga Communism memes.

Yeah, everything's going to...

According to Plan.

I mean, as we expected it to.

Now, I want to talk about how we navigate this discursively, all right?

What's our take on it?

How do we navigate this?

Um, okay, A, let's be clear about what the intentions are behind this.

By the way, Carlos, I don't know. I thank you. Appreciate you, bro.

I want to be clear about what the intentions are behind this.

Um, are they good intentions?

No.

The intentions are related to the strategy to contain and suppress China.

I mean, we all know that.

If you don't know that, you've got to be stupid by now.

So, of course, it's obviously related to China.

And the control of the supply of chips and the framing of things in terms of national security is going to lead to a lot more nationalizations. Of course it is. So, you know, in the context of the U.S. Cold War with China, they have to become a little more like China. And so the intentions are not good and clearly, yeah, but the logic that it introduces

with respect to this sanctity of private property is good.

It does help us that we're setting this, that they're setting a precedent of nationalizations.

Because within our own program, we advocate for nationalizations.

No one can now defer to the sanctity of private property.

So opposition to the sanctity of private property. So opposition

to the nationalization of

intel, like from Thomas Massey

and others,

is reactionary.

In terms of the logic

it expresses, we are neither

for nor against it. That's our position. We're neither

for nor against it. But we support the logic of nationalization and the way in which that's

becoming normalized in U.S. political discourse.

So those who express like Thomas and Massey opposition to this,

it's frankly reactionary.

But it's reactionary

in the sense

of

not in a fascistic sense

but more in a sense

of its vain

it's

it's um

when he frames things

in terms of saying

you know

the role of government

should not be to do this. Excuse me, but can we stop lying to everyone and to ourselves about this idea that corporate America is a private sector that is free from the military industrial complex and the government.

It's not. It's just the difference is there's no accountability.

Why don't we stop lying about this? Well, we have to protect, we have to protect Apple and Intel and all these companies from government overreach.

No, we fucking don't.

They are the fucking shadow government.

They are the fucking deep state.

Okay?

So let's oppose that reactionary political logic, which is against the nationalizations. But let's also not jump for joy for the nationalizations because they serve a, well, they serve a purpose that is obviously part of U.S. Cold War strategy against China,

but such as the irony of history and its contradictory development.

Such as the irony of history. Thank you. Has anyone else been watching the fucking South Parks, by the way?

As I have.

And I find them really strange.

They're all targeted.

You know, it's so funny about what's going on with Trump.

There is an omnidirectional, all-out,

full-spectrum attack on Trump.

South Park,

the Groypers,

and the Democrats,

and Newsom.

And it's like this full spectrum

assault that is destroying his aura.

Like Trump is falling off big time.

Trump's popular support, he's been outflanked and out maneuvered,

and I think it's the Democrats for sure.

I mean, what South Park is doing,

what is their intentions?

You know, who's putting them up to it

i think that there's this this is siops okay i think these are democratic party siops i'm not here to

defend trump i'm not here to defend Vance. Fuck them both.

But I know a sci-op

when I see one, and this is, this

smells and looks like Democratic Party

siops. The Newsom thing,

the,

the, the, the,

the culture

war, the dark woke shit.

I mean, yeah, this is Democratic Party sciops.

And he is getting totally fucking wiped.

I don't want to defend Trump because he's losing so bad.

I just don't think that he's losing for spontaneous reasons.

I think that this is engineered and coordinated.

Now, does that make a difference per se?

No, is an excuse?

No, but if you're losing, you're losing.

You know, it means that he's dead and he's done.

He's a dead dog.

He is a dead dog in U.S. politics.

He is.

But I'm just saying, don't get on board with the dark woke shit.

That's why we're not going to get on board with it because it's a fucking

sci-op and it's also fucking Nazism.

It's Nazism, clear Nazism.

Trump is a dead dog in politics.

And he is now becoming dead in culture, too.

He's fucking losing.

Big time.

Fuck, he is losing the culture war so fucking bad.

I've never seen a U.S. President lose this badly.

At this point, who is,

who are the diehard supporters of Trump?

Because I feel like his approval ratings are down badly.

And he is fucking losing his supporters.

He's losing the far right.

I don't even know if it's boomers at this point. I think he's losing everybody. I don't even know if it's boomers at this point.

I think he's losing everybody.

I think he's been outflanked.

He's been checkmated and he's been outmaneuvered.

Because you know what happened is that Maga turned on Trump.

Of course they did um

they did

and now he's a dead dog

in U.S. politics

and

Newsome is

coming in for the layup

and where's what's going to go on

you know what's going to happen a lot of white people in their 50s and 60s still

love Trump I believe it but that's not enough to decide anything.

I feel like all of the people that are Trump supporters at this point are only Trump supporters because they are in outdated, retarded, and I mean it's in the technical sense of the word retarded

they are in lagged

underdeveloped media ecosystems

whoever's on the cutting edge

in the avant guard of the media

ecosphere is against Trump

but if you are

a boomer

who watches

Fox News still

and if you're

if you're tapped

into the discourse

like

you know

you sometimes

you'll get these

you know

you'll get

shit sent to you like

President Trump is under attack you'll get these, you know, you'll get shit sent to you like,

President Trump is under attack because what's going on

is that they are saying

our president, like that type of shit.

I think it's on Facebook, probably.

That's a retarded media ecosystem.

When I say retarded, I mean it's like delayed.

It's much, much...

It's not at the front. It's like it's not at the front

it's like it's much

delayed I don't know how to say

and

if anything

Trump is being carried by the Republican Party,

MAGA itself is not for Trump, per se. Thank you. oh yeah that's another thing I forgot I should have talked about.

Maybe I'll save it for next stream.

Maybe I'll save it for next stream, but... but we're not ending the stream yet

we're not ending the stream yet

what I know what I actually need to talk about

is the redistricting

the redistricting

the redistricting shit

I had a hot shower I shouldn't have

it's made me slow and delayed

and low energy

the redistricting yeah the redistricting It's made me slow and delayed and low energy.

The redistricting...

The redistricting shit.

We talked about Venezuela in our podcast.

The redistricting shit.

Okay?

All right.

I'll talk about it right now.

Looks like a lot of people are sleeping.

20 subs and I'll talk about it right now.

If not, I'm going to wait until Tuesday.

Falls off the dark web but i got bumped that shit was dead didn't want to take that oh so i took out credit instead click 80 packages from next of course you just got blackly

stead no more so i sent it to my girls instead.

Look, I'm a London scammer.

I see it, I want it, I cook it.

Night's no band old pirates whipping.

Next day, man, started clicking.

No, brewer and waitress tipping.

But I'm going to take this dicking.

Codeine, that's what I'm sipping

Money that's what I'm missing

There we go Jimmy capitalism

All right

I'll give you an idea

Okay

Give you an idea

Basically

Yo, Graham idea. Basically.

Yo, grandma, what's going on?

Appreciate you, bro.

I actually wasn't that serious, but wow, thank you.

Appreciate it.

I kind of want to save it for Tuesday, but I'll give you an idea.

I need to flesh this out and talk about it a lot more comprehensively.

It's actually really important.

So remember the whole Civil War thing and the whole Civil War?

Yo!

Jennifer! Holy fuck!

All right, it's paid for.

I was thinking no one would, and we can end the stream.

But it's an ungraceful wait.

I was going to transition from London Scamer to the end title.

But thank you, Jennifer, appreciate it.

No, okay, I'll talk about it.

Why not?

Oh, it's only 12.

I thought it was 2 a.m.

We're okay.

All right, look, I'll talk about it.

Sure.

So, yo!

Wade with the 10.

Holy fuck, guys.

I don't even deserve this.

I'm such a grifter.

I don't deserve this.

Wade, thank you so much, bro.

Appreciate you.

Wow.

Um,

I craved that shit up. I craved that shit up i craved that shit up

i craved that shit up i'm a london scamma

all right anyway

trade offer you give me

all these subs

I give you

nothing. We're ending this. I'm just kidding.

Anyway.

Okay, so Texas

originally, apparently,

so the story goes,

the process of redistricting your state has to be something that is done i believe

with either congressional or federal government approval is it it's congressional approval right

statewide national congressional approval you can't just do it um

willy-nilly you can't it's against the rules okay of how the procedures of how elections are conducted in the U.S.

There is some kind of national, uh, oversight body or committee.

I don't fucking know what it's called.

I forgot.

That needs to approve all redistricting, um, uh, you know, uh, plans. And, you know, if you don't know how U.S. politics work, fuck, I don't know what to tell you. You know, the different districts, congressional districts that decide

which congressman from each state is going to be sent to the House,

you know know those are

decided with huge

demographic and

other kind of electorate

considerations that determine whether it's going to

be tipped for the Republicans

or the Democrats, right?

So in gerrymandering, the electoral districts are decided.

I mean, I hope most of you know what gerrymandering is, but in case you don't,

in gerrymandering, the electoral districts are decided in ways that basically, you know, guarantee that it's going to go one way or the other, that this is a district that is going to swing red every fucking time or swing blue every time, right? So this is gerrymandering, right?

Anyway,

apparently Texas

has taken initiatives

to redraw

the maps, okay?

Redistrict a lot of the places

in Texas

to benefit the Republican Party.

Supposedly, they were threatening to do this, or they are doing it, or they're planning on doing it, or whatever.

So Gavin Newsom has done something that in terms of the political logic of American liberal democracy is pretty fucking crazy and unprecedented.

He said, Bito, this is Bito, I'm quoting Bito, but Newsom echoed the same thing, saying,

fuck the rules, we're playing dirty and we're doing it this way because you don't follow the rules, so we're not going to follow the rules.

So it could be true that the Texas Republicans are breaking the rules. I mean, they could be.

But only the Democrats are saying fuck the rules. Now, why does that matter? Does it mean the Democrats are worse? No, no, no, no, it's not what I'm trying to say. I'm just trying to say that in U.S. politics, the political logic of violating the procedures of liberal democracy is being normalized officially.

They are doing it.

Okay?

They are breaking the rules.

So Gavin Newsom is planning on redistricting California knowing full well that it's against the rules.

Again, the Democrats, sorry, the Republicans, maybe they're breaking the rules in Texas,

but they're not saying that, you know, they're not being so explicit about it. The fact that formally it's so explicit means what? It means, this is part of the dark, woke thing, by the way, that we are entering an era where the political logic of u.s democracy is such that there's a

breakdown in the common agreed upon procedures and standards for how elections are conducted.

Now, January 6th was significant and 2021 was significant because for the first time, there were

just, so 2016, there were disputes about the culture of elections. So Trump violated those. He was so politically incorrect. So the implicit culture of like, okay, we're not going to be mean. There's not going to be the schmidian friend enemy distinction and enmity

that was thrown overboard 2021 how we observe the outcome of elections was called into question now

the question of do we trust the election?

Are the votes being counted the right way?

Was it rigged?

That was pretty unprecedented.

We're at a new stage in the development of the American Civil War where

they are normalizing

breaking the very procedures

formally of how the elections

are being organized

in this case congressional

elections, not presidential, but still

it's just as important.

This is, do not fucking sleep on this.

A lot of people are sleeping on it because they don't respect form.

When it comes to U.S. politics, they think it doesn't matter.

Form is everything in U.S. politics because we're a bourgeois democracy.

Our constitution and our formal, boring procedures are everything when it comes to what our law and order is.

It may mean nothing to us who are realists who see how things really work.

But it's the thin fucking line in court that decides you're going to jail, you're going,

that's the law.

I mean, that's it.

That's all there is.

It's the thin red line separating order from chaos,

okay, in a bourgeois democracy. I'm not defending it, by the way. I'm just telling, I'm purely

analytical, realistic way to communicate that this is something you should keep an eye on. Okay. So for the first time,

we're just breaking rules now, okay? And we're doing it explicitly and openly. And we're

introducing that political logic.

We don't have to follow the common agreed upon standards and procedures of how we organize elections.

Now, what is all of this?

No, Trump did not set this precedent because trump still claimed to be following all

the rules and yada yada yada he just rhetorically broke precedence. He broke precedents culturally.

And then maybe he broke precedent when it comes to observing the outcome of an election.

But this is way, this is something like really fucking new, okay?

And what is, this is all what what it's foreshadowing the hoi four mod the fire rises absolutely

this is what it fucking is this is a cutscene foreshadowing the next fucking u.s civil war this is how do you think the next U.S. Civil War is going to happen?

Everyone thinks form doesn't matter, but form is the thin red line between who fucking

controls the military.

By the way, there's already been disputes about who controls the military in California and who has the chain of command is.

foreshadowing. But now we are creating the fertile context for the

disputation of elections

is being created

not according to counting ballots

and vote in mail order or Russian

bots. Now it's in terms of what?

It's in terms of

hey, this was not

redistricted procedurally in a correct way, so no, it's illegitimate. And I guarantee you it's going to be brought up as an issue. And now the governors are going to say, no, this was legitimate because Texas did it.

And Texas may say, oh, well, yada, yada, yada.

So there's going to be format.

That's why I'm saying form is everything in a bourgeois democracy as the thin red line between civil war

and status quo because if there's going to be a dispute about what the rules are and what

the procedures and formalities are well hey liberal democracy is rooted formally in just that, right?

And that is going to create an objective.

So you can have a peaceful Civil War, too.

It's just without any violence for a time.

But there's going to be a dispute about what our government is.

And that's what's going to happen.

There's going to be a dispute about what and who the government is and who holds the governmental authority, in this case, at the congressional level, but it's probably going to spill over to the presidential and executive and judicial level, which it kind of already is.

And so the Civil War is on track to happen, just as I've been predicting it would happen.

And it's out of that shit show that I'm gambling and I'm predicting that the American Communist Party will triumph.

I mean, our party was not made to win elections.

Our party was made to emerge dominant and triumphant in the circumstances of a total collapse of the state in a civil war, just to be frank with you, you know.

So keep your fucking eye on the prize, and the prize being what's happening. Follow this very closely and take it very seriously is all I can really say.

Because the Civil War is being foreshadowed.

And, you know, we and uh

you know

we have to be

the ones to see it coming before it does more than anyone else

somebody said bruh how

how well How? Well... belief

Fuck, what else can I say?

We're the ones who believe.

We're the army of believers.

What else can I fucking say?

Nobody else believes in a fucking thing.

Only us.

We're the only ones that have real belief.

And therefore we're going to win.

Isn't that crazy?

We're the only ones that have belief.

Therefore we will win.

Faith. Our rivals are going to be a bunch of fucking crazy killer clowns and fucked up people there's no you know okay do you want to know how we're going to win you actually want that

explained okay 20s i'm just kidding that's a joke

I'll explain it really fast and then we're going to wrap it up

um

although human beings

are decent people and they're good people

in America and they ultimately are good and decent, good people, whatever.

There is no transcendent principle of politics that can preserve the fundamental decency and civilization of the American people that currently exists.

And that's the problem. People may spontaneously and be naturally be responsive to their neighbors and be good people and have good common sense.

But there is no, currently speaking,

there is no common framework

of a transcendent political principle

that can marshal and mobilize armies at scale

and really represent a principle of state power at scale

that can preserve civilization within

america so you have the far right at far right people might on a personal level be decent

people it doesn't matter. Their political principle represents

something really fucking savage. It's a

really savage logic of politics.

Which is probably going to be tolerant

and probably going to open the door

to a lot of fucked up things happening.

And likewise, the same

true as liberals. Liberals who justified

the murder of Darya Dugina,

the philosopher's daughter. I mean, they're fucking

sick and their fucking head.

Okay? Liberals,

you know, destiny,

he's wishing death on

Trump supporters

who have cancer

and shit

like that and

whose children

are dying

because they

can't afford

medical care.

It's disgusting.

You just see

these people.

They are

absolutely

fucking devoid of humanity these liberals

right and then maga maybe maybe but they don't have a principle of politics that's the problem

that's that's why we're doing maga communism because we're trying to discover communism as that principle um

and then you have the far right and the far right are the far right they're fucking savages okay

they're absolute fucking criminal animals.

So we're the only ones

in my estimation, in my view, who are

going to preserve humanity in this country.

As cringe as that sounds.

We don't believe in racial cannibalism. We don't believe in senseless violence. We are the only ones who recognize the value of human life. Why are we the only ones that recognize the value in sanctity of human life because we don't reduce human beings to

discursive subjects. We're the only ones, we communists, are the only ones that at the end of the day

say, you know what, man, you might say and do retarded things, typing on your keyboard or whatever you know what we're still gonna fucking take care of you in your physical health because we think that you're more than just this stupid fucking retard identity that you've adopted you know that's That's what we have in common.

That's our common.

That's our commons.

Our commons is our humanity in a way, you know, and we're the only fucking ones that

recognize that in a way that's irreducible to different identities and different, like, stupid stupid nebulous bullshit things and in a sense like

yeah we have like a hard scientific view in that way like we are like straight up i talk to fucking

rednecks that will call me an Arab and be racist.

I don't fucking care.

Because I know that I'm not, you're not the subject of my communist politics to the extent that I, you know, agree with all the dumb shit you say and believe.

You're the subject of my communist politics to the

extent that I believe you do belong to

a common sophianic principle

of the people

you know,

um,

who,

who do represent,

you know,

our common health,

our common existence, our ability to feed ourselves,

our ability to take care of each other. I know this sounds super fucking cringe and disgusting

because, you know, some shit like Zoran would say, honestly, it's fucking disgusting.

But I don't know, I can't think of a better way of put, honestly, it's fucking disgusting. But, I

don't know, I can't think of a better way of put it

where it's like, yeah, we do have

this common framework of existence

that we do need to attend to

and that has nothing

to do with reducing people

to different cultural labels.

We're not here to identify people as like, you know, oh, you're, um,

there's so many people that are ready to slaughter others because, like, you know, they just don't fuck with your vibe.

Well, kill him.

Kill him then.

It's like, by being so savage and inhumane, you're violating the very foundation of our ability to be human and have subjectivity.

You're violating something more fundamental than just whatever curated online identity you have adopted, right?

So like, we

don't reduce people.

You know what it is? Only

communists are capable

to recognizing human life beyond information.

That's what it is.

We don't reduce human beings to information.

For every other political faction, human life is reduced to information.

And how that information is coded, how it's categorized, and how it's presented to you.

And if someone is only existing to you as a form of information,

then them disappearing as information may as well be them dying, right? And it's no difference to you. But we're the only ones who say they're not reduced to the information. They do exist even if you don't see them on your screen. And they do deserve to be, uh,

lend it a hand when they need help.

Even if you can't see them.

And they're not famous and they're a fucking nobody to you.

Why? Because that's us.

That's us too. You know, uh, we're not always seen. We need our own dignity. We need our own fucking privacy. We're not always just a fucking object for the public

to consume as a piece of information.

And if we don't set the standard

of having each other's back

to that extent,

then what's the fucking say?

We're not going to be made victim to it, you know?

Just as an example.

But we're the only, like, only communists can understand something like that.

And because communists, they're not just like these humanitarians who have this, like, moral framework.

It's more like, we care about the base, the common base, whether it's the means of production or whether it's what I just told you, our ability to have a common sense of existence, you know?

And that is something that cuts beyond the attention economy and beyond the information sphere.

It's more like a principled commitment to attending to the common premises of our existence.

And it's like only communists can do that, you know?

Now, does that mean we mince in warfare?

No, it doesn't.

Does that mean we mourn and shed tears for disgusting people that do get God?

No, we don't.

Who gives a fuck, right?

But at the same time,

are we light

in the way that we treat human life?

Do we treat it lightly?

Do we treat death lightly?

Is it something to just kind of

laugh about, like, how

Nick Fuentes was laughing about

Sinwar? No, of course

not.

Um,

no, it's, it's

an extremely heavy subject.

Even when our enemies die,

take a moment to fucking pause and think about shit.

Don't fucking just dance on their grave.

What are you dancing for?

You're gonna die one day too.

Fucking life is not some...

Death is not something

to fucking trifle with,

you know?

At least have a...

have an observe...

a silence.

The worst thing I can do

to my dead enemies

is say nothing.

If I'm going to be totally honest, like, that's the worst I'll do.

I'll just fucking, I won't say anything.

What do you want me to say?

I won't say a fucking thing.

Am I going to rub it in their face?

Like, no.

You're dead.

It's over.

You know?

Um,

and I'm going to die too one day.

And,

and, and uh that's it uh who the fuck else has these principles

no one else you know nobody else else. You know?

Nobody else thinks this way, except us.

And, you know, people say it's moralistic, yadda, I know we're, we can be ruthless if we're forced to be in those conditions of a total breakdown of law and order and shit.

But I am a ruthlessly brutal person.

I don't shed tea.

I think that it's a brutal world and fuck you, bitch, you know, I'm on some real shit.

I'm a barbarian.

I'm gangis con,

fucking burn entire cities of the ground.

But

But that's the ruthlessness

and brutality of the world.

See, I observe and respect and recognize the ruthlessness and brutality of our dog-eat-dog world.

But notice how I don't fucking play with it.

I don't play with it. I don't play with it.

I don't fucking...

I'm not a sick fuck

who plays.

I'm not a tiger.

Who fucking charges at a boar

rips its throat out and then starts fucking

playing with its dead body

and dancing on it

no it's you don't think about it you don't

it's done it's fucking brutal

you know there's sick to You don't, it's done. It's fucking brutal.

You know?

There's sick, disgusting fucks that when war comes, they're going to shoot people and they're going to skin them and wear their skin and dance around like Buffalo Bill and shit.

That's where we fucking draw the line.

Okay?

You understand? It's this disgusting hubris where people feel like because they're other people, that they've conquered death themselves.

That's what I don't fuck with.

I don't fuck with when on social media they hear someone die and they go,

Oh, yeah, duh, dude.

Like, not even like a politician, like an actual, like a streamer influence. Like, you know, say what you want about Gonzalo

Lira. Was he a great person? No. But

I mean, there were people that knew him personally

that started celebrating when he died because they debated him and didn't

like him it's so fucking weird dude like they killed him it's so fucked up like holy shit why am i am I moralist who I

because I have this attitude of like

it's kind of a fucking red line

I mean you don't have to cry

you don't even have to pay your respects

at the very least shut the fuck up

you know

that's my attitude at the very least shut the fuck up, you know? That's my attitude. At the very least,

shut the fuck up.

At the very least,

shut the fuck up about it, you know?

And don't say a fucking thing.

You don't have to cry thing you don't have to cry

you don't have to fucking do anything

just at least shut the fuck

up and don't say a

fucking word

to use discourse

to feel like you've conquered death itself

that's my

I hate that

I hate this idea

that internet discourse has made

us conquer death

that we're now immortal

because we're on the fucking internet with the free flow of

information of unlimited scope and scale and it's always going to be

eternalized on the internet forever therefore we've gained immortality and we now can have this luciferian hubris and pride over mortality and death itself

it is the most disgusting satanic illusion and deception of our time.

No, Redditor, you are not immortal.

No Funko Pop collector, you are not fucking immortal.

No gamer, you're not fucking immortal. No gamer, you're

not fucking immortal. None of you

are fucking immortal. You will

die one day. You will.

And no, it's not a meme.

No, it's not a fucking

Reddit fun fact.

You will fucking die one day. It's a guarantee. It will happen. And that day

should be close to you like a fucking knife on your throat.

Be fucking humble.

You have not conquered death.

You are finite.

You are a fucking piece of sand. People lost that respect. They lost that ability to respect and appreciate it.

It's turn them into fucking disgusting animals,

worse than animals,

you know,

savage disgusting beings that have no place in a human society. I mean

Fortnite dances on this person's grave

It's like

What ultimately are you celebrating That you have, like, what, some extra time?

So, no, it's even worse.

You're asserting the supremacy of this, like, non-human cloud fake world on the dead.

And that's some shit.

The Aztecs, the Mayans, the Egyptians.

They all were like, don't fucking do that, motherfucker.

Respect the debt.

Don't take all these things that will outlive us that we produce and dance on the grave of the death thinking one has conquered.

It's a very delicate balance

that's what all these ancient cosmologies and ontologies

held like do not

fucking cross the line into the dead

and

start asserting the hubris of the living over the dead.

It's a very delicate red line.

And the fact that we have violated that red line

means that we are in for a fucking treat, guys.

There's going to be killer clowns.

Torturing, raping, and killing. Like ISIS. It's going to be fucked. Because there's no respect for death anymore. When there's no respect

for death and the world of the dead, then

the two kind of bleed into

each other, and the

world of the living becomes

indistinguishable, and life is

treated as cheap, and

you can just be walking by, someone

will stab someone they collapse

whatever it's just like

it's become so

fucked up

and everyone is always living

in terror and fear that they're about

to go or worse they don't even

have awareness about it, right?

And this was Liberia, this was Sierra Leone, this was ISIS.

I mean, this is what is in store for us.

And that's why these ancient civilizations were always emphasizing, like, you know, there's a thin

line between death and life, and you have to prospect that line.

There's a world of the dead.

You need to pay homage and respect it because you're going there one day and it's a it's a different

world it's not this one okay um anyway this is kind of deep shit i don't want to get too much

into it you know we've had a long long stream everyone, everyone. Great, powerful stream.

I will see y'all.

I will see y'all Tuesday.

Okay, I'll see y'all Tuesday.

Bye-bye!