COMMUNISM WINNING | WE'RE SO BACK

Can you feel my heart is beating faster than the speed of sound?

Can't you feel my heart is beating faster with you alone?

Going on, bro.

Appreciate you with the 25.

Wow, Lionel with the one.

What's going on, bro?

Kuzaz with the five.

What's up, Kuzaz?

How we doing today?

Y'all gotta be understanding.

You guys have to understand.

You gotta understand the type of shit.

I mean, if you fucking sleepy, wake the fuck up.

Ain't no time for sleepy Joe Biden.

Ain't no time for being a sleepy Joe Biden.

What's up?

Escayon, what's up, Escayon?

I know it's late.

I know it's late.

I know his late

Y'all don't think I don't know it's late?

No, no, no, y'all don't think I don't understand that it's late?

Y'all think it's beyond me that's it it lies my understanding, my comprehension, my grasp of how late it is?

Wake the fuck up!

Some baby ass shit, people being sleepy and shit.

Some baby ass shit.

We get these streams three times a week, and they come when they come.

And that's ultimately on me.

Do you understand?

And I'm still on kick.

Fuck it.

August, we're going to YouTube.

Going to YouTube, August.

If we meet the sub-goal.

Soon as we meet the goal, we're going to YouTube, k?

Now

My cult members

It's fucking interesting 'cause there's some very decisive stuff for the party I actually have to talk about.

It's actually fucking crazy.

We have to s review something, look at something and talk about it and I have to explain to you, get you up to speed on some of the things that are going on of some rather decisive significance, if I may say so.

Quite significant developments that are going on across the board.

Now, I want to fucking make an announcement first before I do that.

And there's not enough gorillas that are here.

That's the fucking problem.

Okay, if you're here, you're fucking really smart.

Okay, so for those that are in line, I'm gonna tell you: gorillas are handling the infrawoke thing like fucking Down syndrome retards.

Fuck, I'm sorry to insult down syndrome, but it's like it's like an extra chromosome level of retardation that I'm seeing among gorillas.

Once again, doing the exact thing that I fucking predicted that they would do, taking it too far and extreme.

Can you just fucking be normal?

It's like, I see so much stupidity, retardation, performativity.

Holy fuck, can you just not understand?

This is about the golden center.

And nobody understands that InfraWoke, it's actually what InfraWoke is about.

It's not about being woke 1.0.

InfraWoke, first of all, just to be clear, for us, it has nothing to do with LGBT.

Okay, nothing has changed.

We don't have a problem with them.

But we don't want to randomly attack them and call them slurs.

And that's it.

Like, what does it have to do?

I mean, people need to understand InfraWoke is about being, it's like Sufism.

Really?

It's like Sufism, really.

It's about being enlightened.

It's about being enlightened.

I went on a whole lecture explaining it.

And then the gorillas completely flies over their head.

And some of them run to X and run to Twitter.

And now they're trying to be nice people.

And they're trying to be.

Can you understand?

You are doing the, you're making the mistake.

It's like people are have two things in their head that they decide between.

Demonism, being demonic, and being shitlibs, and why can't you be infra-woke?

You guys understand it's about Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping, this is about the mystical side of Marxism, this is about the dark Marxism, this is dark Mali, this is about literally the you know what infra woke is like?

It's like

Yeah.

You want me to sing the InfraWoke anthem?

I'll come up with it right on the spot right now.

If you want to understand InfraWoke, it's like.

Infrawoke is on some shit like

Hi

Like, you gotta be on some enlightened type of shit.

You gotta be on the mystical, one with the cosmos type of thing.

That's infra-wook.

It's about the moral cosmos, it's about aligning yourself.

Do I speak in vain?

Do I speak in vain?

This is the problem.

Midnight Warrior, what's up?

What's up, Midnight Warrior?

So gorillas, you know, and and then some people think it's very strange.

They think I'm taking a strange turn.

Some people think so.

You know some people think so.

You wanna know why this is the best community in the world?

Because we are a community we're quite diverse, but we have a strong amount of white rednecks who are being led by a crazy man.

Bryce, what's up?

Normal white rednecks being led by an Islamic mystic.

Nowhere else you have anything like that, and then people say why?

They say why.

The secret about Infra Haas, the secret about Haas, if you want to know the true secret about Haas, the true secret about Haas is that he is of the white rednecks, not just the white rednecks, all the Americans, black, Latino.

But you need to understand, I am not of.

The foreign I'm not of the Middle East.

I'm LARPing that way for you.

I'm bringing something you need.

If I wanted to be of the Middle East, I would just go there and play soccer.

I would play soccer like the rest of them.

I would play soccer and be like European style and play soccer.

And I would uh wear flip-flops and all these kind of things I don't do, right?

People need to understand, Haas, why are you imposing your ways upon these white rednecks?

Why are you imp and I say my ways are of them, of this soil, of this land.

The Emerald Mountain of the Sufis, it's literally in the Rocky Mountains.

You, my friends,

All ye whites, you blacks, you Latinos, you Americans,

You are the ummah.

You are the subject.

You are the ones who will be the army.

under the banner of a new Islam.

It will be you, not Arabs, it will be you.

And that's what I have come to tell you.

And then some people say, It doesn't make sense.

It doesn't make sense.

And then I say, Well, just imagine it like a cult.

Then it makes sense.

Just imagine it as just another wacky American cult.

And then it makes perfect sense.

You understand?

If you imagine it as another wacky American cult, then suddenly the people think I'm a stupid guy.

They think I'm stupid.

They go, Haz, what does this have to do with America?

Americans are scared of Muslims.

And I go, Yes, I know.

Yes, I know.

I know they are.

I say they're only scared of what is within them.

Okay?

So I am doing this.

It's an incredible venture.

You know what I could be?

You know who I could be if I wanted to be.

You know who I could be?

Patrick Bett David.

You know who I could be?

I could be Patrick Bett David.

I could be a guy sitting here with a suit.

Hello everybody, I am Patrick Bett David.

I am a brown foreigner from the Middle East who has an identity crisis and I'm going to pretend that I am an East Coast wise guy who likes Quentin Tarantino maybe or maybe more like Scarface.

I'm blanking on the name.

I've watched The Godfather.

I've watched Scarface with Tony Montana and Al Pacino and the others.

Basically, it's a good old Italian wisdom because they're quite dark looking and I'm a dark brown person and therefore I am as they are.

So I am Patrick Bette David.

I have an American flag right on my desk and I'm here to fit in with you.

I'm here to tell you how American I am.

I may come from a foreign background and have this identity crisis because I haven't properly assimilated.

But I overcompensate by it by saying this is good old classic Al Pacino Italian American wisdom.

It's basically the same thing.

I'm basically Italian.

I fit in.

I have a US flag here.

I wear a suit.

I'm a normal American similar to a car salesman.

I'm a used car salesman who's here to sell you Americanism.

See, that's the smart way to do it.

Unlike Hazaldine.

Hazaldine is...

What are you talking about?

That's not America.

America's a brand.

It's getting raped by foreigners.

I don't sell you America.

I sell you something for you.

The American brand is raped by foreigners, by Zionists, by people who exploited and gullible retards fall for it, hook, line, and sinker.

Did you know that?

You know, I'm the only one who loves Americans.

I love the whites and the black people, and I love the Latinos.

I love the Americans.

I love Americans.

And because I love you, Americans, I have to give you this foreign thing, this is this Islam.

I'm giving you a Gnostic pill to awaken you to something that looks foreign and strange to you.

But I'm actually rescuing you from this Gnostic prison, this archontic prison that you're in that's draped in stars and stripes and shit, right?

Because I care about the American people, and I want them to be free from this.

And I want them to awaken to the barbarians within.

And this is the fact.

And he goes, learn some respect.

You can't force people to convert to your ideology.

Yes, I can.

Absolutely, I can.

Once if you are forcefully converted to this ideology of Allah, Cosmos, Xi Jinping.

Ones if it was by force.

And the force in question comes from the cosmos.

Of course it does.

You see how many people I forced?

So you saying I cannot force these people.

You saying I

You're saying I can't force.

Absolutely, I can.

This is why there are nonstop wars.

We got a wise person in the chat.

Did you know that?

We have a very wise person.

We have someone who's so wise and so awakened to the way things are in the world and why they're the way they are.

And he understands the root causes of warfare and tribalism and division among humanity.

And his solution is more like: Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can we be friends?

Speaking of why can't we be friends?

Guess who's breaking out of their shell?

Joe Sims.

Ah, we're going to cover it.

We have the American Communist Party.

We're going to cover it.

And we're going to make a critique of it.

You see how the American left stealing all of our memes?

Stealing everything.

Because we make a critique of it.

Because we're Maoists.

We make a critique of it.

Man, that's some infrared shit.

And they took it.

And they took it from us.

And now they they make it and now Hassan Piker is covering it and they all covering it.

Pay your tribute, pray the jizya, pay what you owe to us.

We are the ones who are the pioneers.

We need to understand we're about three years ahead of everyone.

Okay, first of all, first rule of understanding infrared.

We're about three years ahead of everyone.

Okay?

Just about three, four years and ahead.

Actually, I would say four years.

Four years ahead of everyone.

Now everyone's coming around.

I have to show you a lot of the shifts.

Man, big theme of tonight's stream.

I'm going to show you shifts that are happening so you can fucking open your fucking eyes and see it.

Gorilla Zansons ups on the run.

I'm going to show you guys something.

Let me show you something.

Let me show you something.

Let me show you something.

Let me show you something.

Look at this.

Okay, so both the nephew and the son are awakening to something.

Ukraine shot an Iranian commercial ship.

Why is Ukraine doing this?

Well, part of the reason why Ukraine is doing this is because it's in Ukraine's best interest, I guess, from Zelensky's calculation, to operate as an American proxy in the region and try to get America to join the battle.

Ukraine's security service, the SBU, said that Ukrainian forces struck an Iranian vessel transporting military cargo between Iran and Russia in the Caspian Sea.

Iran's foreign ministry said that the targets was a commercial vessel and that the attack had killed one sailor and injured another.

Mark Ames says Zelensky knows that Ukraine's only path to victory against Russia is direct NATO and U.S.

involvement.

Biden reportedly used to complain about how Zelensky was trying to suck the U.S.

into Ukraine, joining the U.S.-Israel war on Iran as Ukraine's best shot at World War III.

Trudipar says Ukraine is not trying to just enter the war with Iran.

Rather, it appears it is trying to merge the Ukraine war with the Iran war.

I agree with this assessment.

Do you think it'll work?

I don't know.

I have a policy of not conducting analysis on the basis that world leaders are crazy.

But unfortunately.

So, okay, so.

The hour of victory will be upon us.

When Hassan Piker finally visits Russia, frankly, when Piker takes the Russia pill, not just the China pill, he's already taken the China pill.

When Piker takes the Russian pill, it's over.

We are in.

The barbaric hordes will breach the gates.

When they start being as pro-Russia, when they start understanding Russia is just like Iran and China, when they finally accept Russia.

We're in.

You understand?

The hour of victory will be immediate.

But this is happening on the US left.

So we have some things going on.

Laura, Larry Loomer, Larry Loomer, they, I can't say she, I don't know their pronouns.

They, Larry Loomer, Laura Loomer, has gone to Ukraine, met with Zelensky.

So now the right wing is behind.

Ukraine and now the left is becoming more anti Ukraine.

Look at

Jenk.

I'm done officially with supporting the Ukrainians' war.

So it's been a long time now.

I don't know.

They seem like they've been at war for about 18 years now.

So the reason I was in favor of it because Russia attacked them.

It was definitely Russian aggression.

Yes, there were reasons and excuses, etc.

Bottom line is: you attack someone like Israel attacks Lebanon, it's Israel's fault.

Russia attacks Ukraine.

It's Russia's fault.

So, number two, we had promised the Ukrainians defense when we had them give up their nuclear weapons.

Okay, but now we've supported you for about 87 years in a row in this war.

There's a limit to how long we can go.

What if the war goes for two centuries?

Do we still owe you, right?

So, now, the second issue is that Ukraine has now become basically Israel.

Now, why do I say that?

Yeah, we're rare show talks about this phenomenon.

It's really important.

Remember, Russia was helping Iran and Syria.

Israel needed Russia distracted so they could topple Bashar al-Assad.

Oh, wait, that happened, didn't it?

It did during the Ukraine-Russia war, and that Iran couldn't be helped when Iran was attacked.

Oh, right, that also happened during the Ukraine-Russia war.

So, Ukraine and Israel working together keeping Russia busy so that Israel can attack its neighbors and take so they always understood this.

It's just that they were so libbed out under Joe Biden's hypnosis.

I forgive you, Jenk.

I forgive you, Hassan Piker.

I felt quite alone back in those days of 2022.

Now they're coming around.

I'm going to talk about this.

More territory.

So, before that was apparent to people who were paying attention, now it's more than apparent.

It's obvious because Ukraine is literally joining the war and attacking Iran.

I'm going to go back.

Guys, it's like Surah Al-Kaf from the Holy Quran, right?

Where basically we are being persecuted, and then we go into a cave, and then we sleep, and then we emerge decades later.

And everyone has come around to our position, right?

That's the story of the cave.

Actually, in the Bible, it's the same story from the Christian stories, right?

So, this is the situation miraculously.

Everyone is waking up.

But you know what?

I think I'm going to say number one: self-criticism because nobody makes a critique of it more than Hazal Deen.

Such a humble man.

Everyone praises Hazal Deen.

What a humble man.

He is he who always self-criticizes, always upfront and honest about some things they never really truly understood properly.

It's like I need a round of applause all the time to show how humble I am because I'm the most humble man in the world and I need people to continuously give me a round of applause because of how humble I am to praise my humbleness, if you will.

Only a truly humble man should be praised as much as Hazal Deen, who happens to be me, if you didn't know that.

So to self-criticize a little bit, right?

And and you know, you know, that round of applause, you should think about it, spamming it right now.

You should think about spamming the round of applause right now.

And now you should stop.

And now you should stop.

Please, please, please.

Just please.

Please, you're too generous.

Please.

Please, please.

I'm too humble for this.

Please.

No, no, no, please.

I'm too.

No, no, I'm far too humble for this.

Please.

Okay, literally stop.

Okay, and you know, it's just like, come on, come on.

Anyway, guys, for being how self-critical I am.

Okay, honestly, stop.

I'm not even kidding.

Like, literally, stop.

What the hell?

Now you guys are being annoying.

Okay.

So, in all seriousness, okay, now pay attention.

I'm being serious.

I'm being serious.

The joke is over.

I was just being, whatever.

Okay.

I never understood how US polarization, and I should have.

You read the rise of mega-communism.

And I overly rationalize

The American left, quote unquote, the leftists, and the right wing.

Although I was correct about my descriptions, there was an over-rationalization of those two.

The truth is the most potent predictor of political polarity at this point, or sorry, of what your position is versus the imperial hegemony at this point.

Polarization.

It's just if the Democrats are in power, then the Republicans, people who are MAGA and so on, they're going to be more counter-hegemonic.

And if Trump is in power, then people who are Democrat-leaning will be going down these trajectories of radicalization.

And the pipeline is just based on who's in power and who's not.

Like, America is so polarized that the content of the division, that's how you know it's a real civil war.

The content of the division doesn't even matter at this point.

Because whoever the regime is, it's just about where there's the pipeline to radicalization.

You see, when Biden was in power, the pipeline to radicalization was much easier for MAGA to do.

Because if you're a shitlib, you spend all your time apologizing for the regime.

But when Trump is in power, the pipeline to radicalization becomes quite easy if you're on the left or if you're liberal.

So there's nothing fundamentally that aligns.

American left liberals to Ukraine, actually, when you think about it.

It was just the fact that Biden was president.

Now that Trump is president, they're even the one thing I thought is impossible, they're starting to turn on Ukraine.

And I think that's so interesting.

It's just about the polar, the polarization is so intense.

It can make you have any position.

For example, if Trump was pro-LGBT, then left liberals would start being anti-LGBT.

I'm convinced.

If it's all about the polarization, like if Trump

Polarization goes much deeper than we thought, is what I'm trying to say.

Much deeper.

And I thought not because of COVID, because during COVID

You know, it seemed like it was clear, even though Trump was president, there is a, there, you, but no, the truth is, it's not so simple.

You know, there is a third party, there is a third party populistic demographic who are waking up.

But listen, you know, Vosh called it the Nasbull vortex, and we don't have to call it the Nasbull vortex, but that vortex is real.

It's a vortex that pulls you in, pulls in MAGA, and it can pull in people from the liberal left.

And the vortex in question is the American People's Party, the third estate, so to speak, the forgotten voice of popular sovereignty that is not officially classified or categorized in U.S.

politics.

The people who are anti-Fauci under Trump, even though Trump was pro-vax.

You know, like this is all a vortex that you can't classify as Republican or Democrat.

You know, it's a it's the American people, it's the popular sovereignty, right?

And live left liberals can be pulled into it just like people from MAGA were, right?

So that's very interesting.

And everything seems to change.

Just on that, just like that.

And you know me.

You know my policy.

Uh, if they come around to being anti-NATO, then I am okay.

I mean, Laura Loomer is going to Ukraine.

Fuck that bitch.

Russia is good.

You want to know why Russia is good in principle?

Russia's borders do not end.

There's no po Russia is good.

Russia's borders don't end.

Russia is the world.

Russia is the prince of the world.

Russia is a world polarity.

It's the polarization of the whole world.

Russia, it's why Malema said we are Putin and Putin is us.

Russia is.

Is

The flag of Tartaria.

If you're pro-Russia, you are good.

Like by default, you're good.

And if you're anti-Russia, by default, you are bad.

Like, that is one of the most fundamental forms of polarization of the world.

And why?

Because Russia is not a small, stupid country.

Russia is a universal empire.

Russia has no borders.

Russia is a global influence.

Russia is a soul.

It's about the soul of all of universal humanity.

Russia is more than just a country.

You need to understand that.

Russia is not simply a state or a country or the Putin administration.

Russia is a form of universal humanity.

It's literally one of the most multicultural, multilingual, multi-ethnic places in the world.

It's not a small nation.

It's not a simple country.

It's a universality of some kind.

Right?

And even if there are uh evil there's no such thing as an evil

True Z person.

There's an evil traitor to Russia who disguised himself as pro-Russian for sure.

But Russia is good.

It's a force of good.

And China is uh everything is different.

China is good, yes, but China is not the polarity.

China it's very there's a reason why it's easier to be pro-China than it is to be pro-Russia.

Because right now,

Politically, geopolitically, China is more neutral than Russia is.

Apparently.

Not in reality, but apparently.

Right?

Russia, put it this way: the Mongol horde is ascendant.

Russia is the gateway.

The gateway.

China's already there, but Russia's the gateway.

If you're against the gateway, you are against the world revolution.

It's about the world revolution, is it not?

It's always been about that.

Okay, this is a disaster.

Almost immediately being contradicted.

This video was fundamentally stopped functioning as a political party and kind of fighting.

Game.

So this video went viral on Instagram.

Viral on Instagram.

It went viral on Instagram.

Did you know that?

It got over a thousand likes.

And you would not believe the things Joe Sim says in this video.

Are you ready to hear it?

We fundamentally stopped functioning as a political party and kind of functioned as an appendage to the Democratic Party.

Adverbatum, this is our language.

This is the language we have used when we've talked to the Chinese, when we have published our declaration.

This literally is our language.

This is the language from the petition movement.

This is our words.

Our language, by the way.

You need to understand who originated this term, appendage of the Democratic Party.

What's changed since the last leadership?

Like, what's changed with you and Rosanna and the direction that you're taking the party?

There had been a gradual dilution of the party's political and organizational status that was initiated by the previous chairman of the party.

His name was Sam Webb.

Not to put all the blame on him because it was a kind of collective responsibility.

And after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was a general actually in the left effort to re-evaluate Marxism, Marxism, Leninism.

What was the cause of this collapse?

Was there something inherent in the doctrine that that was wrong?

I don't think that there was.

And that led some in our leadership to draw erroneous political conclusions, that the name of the party was a weight around our neck, that the political structure of the party was weighing us down.

They didn't subscribe to democratic centralism, that the whole concept of the party as a leading collective was wrong, that we shouldn't take initiative on any effort that the broader democratic labor or civil rights movement had not already taken up.

They thought that that was inherently sectarian.

We started tailing developments.

We stopped running candidates.

The party literally from the ACP Declaration fundamentally stopped functioning as a political party and kind of functioned as an appendage to the Democratic Party.

We didn't see ourselves that way, but objectively, if you look at it, that's kind of what happened.

And when Sana and I came into the leadership, we felt very strongly that we needed to rebuild the party from the bottom up.

So...

Rebuild the party.

Those were the debates, and we haven't solved it yet, but I think we're going in the right direction.

The vehicle of the Communist Party as a working-class revolutionary party, that's the right vehicle.

There's no question about that.

And history has proven that in a whole number of places.

Why am I keep getting this?

The party gives me the ads.

Why would I get an ad for an ad blocker?

The whole thing is.

Okay, let's talk about the content.

So

Um

No, we have to talk about this.

This is some I'm such a naive person.

I'm so naive and a paranoid person would say this is cynicism, that this is cynicism, that they see the energy around ACP and they're trying to, you know, not uh not sincerely change the direction, but they rather want to position themselves in a way that the ACP has in order to siphon more people over to them rather than the ACP, and it's purely out of cynicism.

So, as a crazy man,

I will give Joe Simms a chance to disprove this.

Paranoia that I have, this cynicism that I might have, and say, Joe, if you're serious about what you say, then let's have a talk.

And I know the people in the party who will cry and get upset that if we have a talk, our personnel are much better than such people, in my opinion, in terms of their loyalty and commitment to this.

So Joe, if you're serious about this, let's talk.

Uh genuinely, sincerely.

If there's no difference between Joe Sims and ACP anymore.

Then let's talk.

Think about this.

If there's no difference any more and he's sincere about what he says,

No, shut up about ACP USA.

You need to stop.

You're getting ahead of yourselves.

Everyone needs the fuck plus.

You need to stop.

No, we're ACP.

But we're not sectarians.

If he's serious about what he's saying, then let's talk.

Why don't you talk to ACP?

Why don't we talk?

All we should do is just talk.

Leadership to leadership.

Let's talk.

Let's get in a room and discuss

Let's talk.

Uh I mean that very sincerely.

I mean it very sincerely.

I o this is my open invitation.

If you guys know people in the CPU don't go through people because you have to send it directly to Joe.

Because maybe there's people in CPUSA who are bad faith actors who don't want such a thing.

So if you can send directly to Joe that I want to talk.

If you're serious about what you're saying in this clip, we will talk to you.

Will I am I talking about a decision?

Am I talking about decisions?

No, I'm saying we can talk if you're serious about what you say.

Why should we not talk if you're serious, right?

And uh

ACP is where what we wrote in our declaration.

We stand by that and we mean it and we ride with it.

And we don't regret anything and we've done what we've done.

But if he's sincere, you can say, Haas, you should never forgive them for what they did.

And then I have to say, but that's not the Leninist way.

The Leninist way is that if someone comes around to the correct line, you have to have a dialogue and you have to forgive them.

Not forget, forgive.

Because, for example, ACP had to happen before Joe Sims could ever even admit this, right?

Um, before CPUSA was ever capable of admitting such a thing, there had to have been ACP, right?

There's a reason for that.

So, no, we're not going to say we were going to forget, but I'm saying, could I forgive someone who comes around to the correct position?

Yes, I can forgive them.

Uh if Joe was serious about this.

He's saying this isn't as a new position.

He's saying this clip, this was their position all along.

Now, I'm going to tell you what Joe Sims is saying.

Joe Sims is saying that he and Rosanna always had intended this, but because they never found a solution, they never pursued.

So because they didn't have this solution, they didn't pursue it.

But that's what he intended.

They just never f saw a solution.

And if you're serious about solution, Joe, then we should talk to us.

You risk leaking strategy.

No, there's no leak of anything.

We we'll talk, that's it.

I'll talk to anyone, by the way.

We don't recognize the CPUSA at all.

They have no status to us.

They are completely defunct.

They are defunct to us.

That doesn't mean we cannot talk to Joe Sims if he has changed his position or if he's serious about what he's saying.

Just to talk.

Well, here's the difference, okay?

I genuinely think I lean eighty percent, nan ninety percent, that this is cynical, that this is just because ACP has all this energy and they're just saying this now to try to direct that en some of that energy to themselves.

But I leave 10% open because I'm not a sectarian.

The way you can prove that you're serious about this is to have a talk.

In my opinion, the way you can prove the way to prove it.

Okay, how do we?

I give him an opportunity to prove it, I give them an opportunity to prove it.

I don't hold grudges.

I'm not a petty, small person.

And maybe Joe is small and petty.

Maybe.

I don't know him personally.

Maybe he cannot forgive.

All of the trolling and the memes and all this stuff.

But ultimately who cares about that?

No one cares.

A real comedy I don't think Joe cares about that.

How could he?

You know how he wanted to always believe in Joe Sims?

You know how my how heartbroken I am?

Like in the beginning, I wanted to be Joe Sims' friend.

I w I wanted to be Joe Sims' friend and Rosanna.

And I just wanted to help in whatever way I could.

I wanted to help make the party more independent.

I wanted to be free from the Democratic Party.

I wanted the Communist Party to be great.

That's all I wanted from the beginning, by the way.

That's what twenty thirty six was about, by the way, always.

And, you know, I wanted to, I didn't ever want it to be enemies.

I never wanted to be enemies.

I always wanted independence, and that's it.

But then I I would just get s like a venomously.

I would just get like bitten, like the snake is biting me.

Like I lend out my hand to Joe Sims to shake his hand.

And then a snake comes and bites my hand, and I think.

What did I do?

And then I learned that it was maybe someone named Taryn Fivek who is getting in Joe's ear, maybe.

I don't know.

I don't know.

But there are people in the there are gatekeepers in the CPUSA who did not want to see that happen.

Maybe Taryn is gone.

Is Taryn still part of the CPUSA?

Does anyone even know?

Is Taryn still running that organization?

Because if not, then I think the root cause.

I'm not saying that this reverses anything, I'm just saying that.

If Joe is sincere, then I want to give him an opportunity to prove it to everyone.

I'm not a petty person at all.

And or maybe i the key thing, if they still are calling us fascist and stuff, then then this is cynical.

Because if they're saying oh, ACP are nausebles and fascists, okay, you're just engaging in cynicism then, because you know that's not true, and yet you're saying the very things we said that were the founding purport of the ACP as the reconstitution of your party.

And you are you're signaling that you don't disagree with us about the fundamentals, you know, and so if you don't, then let's have a conversation.

And it's so simple.

Um

But, you know, like, I don't want to insult anyone, but you want to know who I think would have a big problem with this conversation.

This is who Joe has to deal with, probably, right?

Hardcore, godless, communists.

They're godless communists.

All communists are godless.

They don't believe in God.

Well, it's news to me.

I've been a Christian for basically all of my life, and I've been a communist for a number of years as well, and I've never really seen them as being contradictory.

There's actually quite a lot of us out there.

Okay, you guys are fine.

I have no issue with you, but are you the reason?

That we get called these things.

That Joe Sims thinks these things about us.

There are certainly Christian communists, but I happen to not be one of them.

I am spiritual though, so I actually am indigenous, Mickeysuki band of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma.

I do have like a sense of indigenous philosophy that goes along with the indigenous opposite of spiritualists.

I refute Trump's claims of these so-called godless communists.

I serve Allah and my community.

I am called to love.

Was not expecting that.

Pretty based.

I don't know if that helps combat Trump in the country so much.

Uh

Every Communist I know has been a person of profound faith, base in uh the human.

But you know, if you think about the fundamentals, it's like, well, we agree.

We this is another thing we agree up on.

So why you know, I'm just saying we do if you're genuine about this thing about being independent of Democrats.

But I have to I I just don't want to be heart I keep getting heartbroken, you know?

Because I am not a cynical person, I'm not a paranoid person, my mentality is basically benefit of the doubt always, but I keep getting burned.

And I genuinely think it's another one of those cases where, well, maybe the CPUSA is ran by feds.

What the defunct thing that we call the CPUSA, maybe it's run by feds and there's never a chance.

Which is the thing I was set I was told from the beginning, there's not a chance in hell.

That you can be good faith and just assume that it's a good faith thing because there's a preordained direction that is just because of people's world or something.

And so, mm.

For now it's empty words, but I want to leave a door open in case it's sincere.

That's it.

Do you guys I'm just taking us back down memory lane?

Listen.

Those were the days, my friend.

We thought they'd never end.

We're just going down memory lane because remember in before ACP how Infrared, how we would just cover the CPUSA remember when we would just cover Good Morning Revolution, Good Morning Revolution, remember when we would cover it and remember when we would keep up with what's going on and

Why not email him for a meeting?

Uh I I will, I will, but someone also has to talk to him.

Listen, little Marco Rubio man.

Let me set your ass straight.

Cuba did not make me a communist.

You all, in your planned closing and your crack and heroin epidemics, your police murders and forever wars, you made me a communist.

Hey, Comrade Joe here.

And I'll admit, Fidel is a great speaker.

And Che, that's one dashing figure.

But no.

It was U.S.

Steel and General Motors closing its doors, laying off tens of thousands of workers.

It was seeing my hometown collapse, my brothers and sisters ODing and being strung out on crack.

Subterranean, what's up, man?

Appreciate you.

It was the police murders of Amadou and Trayvon, Eric Garner, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd.

It was the subprime housing swindle where you and your kind made trillions and nobody went to jail.

Y'all got that shit rigged and everybody knows it.

I like the new orientation where he's talking because people used to say I'm unserious and unprofessional because I use bad words and but now Joe is sounding more like me every day.

Which I'm not saying is bad at all.

I'm saying it's like I like it, you know.

This is someone I could talk to.

I feel like I could talk to them.

And I would have utmost respect for my elders because I do.

Believe it or not, I do respect my elders.

Even when I went into the Zoom meeting, did I attack Joe in the Zoom meeting?

No, I attacked Taryn Fivek.

It wasn't, you know, I attacked, I immediately went for Terran feedback.

I didn't attack Joe Simps.

Remember that.

Although I did make the edit of him looking like Darth Sidious.

I did make that, I will confess to that.

I did make him appear like Darth Sidious when I wrote the about the the National Convention.

But that's only because we had no choice.

And I don't regret it because, as the record stands, you know, everything went how it did, as the record stands.

change and that change is coming.

So no, little Marco, Cuba didn't make us communists.

You all and your capitalist system did it all by yourselves.

Listen, little Marco Ru

Recognizing a communist, physical appearance counts for nothing.

If he openly declares himself to be a communist, we take his word for it.

If a person consistently, something you need to keep doing red flags.

You need more red flags.

More red, red.

You have 10 red flags and one US flag.

That should be the rule.

For every one US flag you fly, you fly 10 red flags.

That's how you have aura.

That's how you mog.

Because sometimes people, sometimes when I see ACP on the street, it's 10 U.S.

flags and then one red flag.

No, you need 10 red flags and one US flag.

Basically, like you need a domination of red.

Why do people fear that?

It's like you're apologizing for who you are before you even announce your existence.

We are not Pat Sox.

We're not Caleb Maupin.

Okay?

The term red flag has a bad rap right now.

And if you were truly cultured, you would know it doesn't at all.

It does not have a a bad rap at all.

If you were truly cultured you would know that.

He may be a communist.

If a person supports organizations which reflect communist teachings or organizations labeled communist by the Department of Justice, she may be a communist.

If a person defends the activities of communist nations while consistently attacking the domestic and foreign policy of the United States, she may five red flags and five American flags.

In the most non-homophobic sense possible, that is the gayest thing I've ever read in my life.

Like, you have no understanding of dialect.

Like, I'm I don't mean to roast you, but that is the most cringy, like, Barney the Dinosaur thing I've ever fucking read in my entire life.

We're just gonna have it half and half, to be fair.

No The red flag dominates!

Always.

The USA flag is the historical flag.

Should probably be a Betsy Ross flag.

It's the historical flag of our country.

The red flag is the active, vital flag of the revolutionary future.

That is our flag.

Hundred red flags, zero American flags.

I mean honestly the US flag is completely optional, if I'm gonna be honest.

It is optional.

Like if it's all just red, like a sea of just red flags, maybe some with our party's logo, that would have aura and go hard as fuck.

But it's like

Like that would go hard as fuck.

The problem is like guys, are we not on the same page?

Okay, nothing against LGBT people, but that flag r is what ruins leftism.

When leftists have the USSR flags and then they have these again, I don't hate the community, but the flag is hideous.

It's the the rainbow flag and stuff.

It's like that's what the aura loss comes from.

If it was just red, it would be like great.

If it was just red, if it was just red, there would be no aura loss at all.

Now, one US flag for respect is not an aura loss.

But when you have 10 US flags and one red flag, it's an aura loss.

I'm not gonna lie.

It's a massive, it's corny, it's a massive aura loss.

I'm not gonna lie.

Massive aura loss.

Just have one.

One Betsy Ross flag out of respect to honor the history, to honor the first historical flag of the American state.

If you want to have the Lincoln flag, you can use that one instead maybe.

And it's like have it out of a groundedness if you need it.

But to have five and five is.

Really cringe.

When you say compromise at five and five, it's like

That's not how it works.

That's not how it works.

You cannot have equality.

There's you need to understand dialectics.

There's a dominant tendency.

There's always a dominant tendency.

There's never an equality of principles.

That's paganism.

You can't have that.

It's nonsense.

Anything that evokes compromise evokes weakness.

Remember that.

Anything that evokes and elicits compromise, I'm gonna, everyone lock the fuck in.

I'm gonna teach you about something.

Lock the fuck in, and I wanna see you understanding.

Lock the fuck in.

Locked the fuck in.

Are you locked the fuck in, yes or no?

When it comes to your visual p presentation and your self-expression, or anything in life in general, anything that expresses compromise is weakness.

Being strong and effective and compelling is about having a coherent, consistent, clear, radiant, potent principle that is one.

No compromise.

It is what it is.

Now it's embedded, it's rooted for sure, but it is one thing that you're communicating: one message.

Not two messages.

You're not saying I'm an American patriot and I'm a communist.

If you're a true Marxist-Leninist, but you communicate one thing that says this is the comprehensive world historical reality: that the only people who will build the American nation are the communists.

The communist project is the future.

We are the strong path forward for the country.

We are not negotiating with any other identities, nothing, just communism.

That is strength.

Ten red fl for every one American flag you need ten red flags.

And having a uniform

No, you don't need a uniform, k you don't need a uniform.

You need

To have drip, you need to have drip, you need to be looking good and stylish.

Like, it's not an excuse to have no drip.

There's never an excuse to be dripless.

Oh, I'm a communist, so I don't have to have drip.

No, that's not true.

Actually, you need to have more than anyone.

If Marxism is a true science, if Marxism-Leninism is a true science, then you should be the most impressive-looking, having the most drip.

Why do you think communist songs from history were the best?

Why did they make the best songs?

Because they proved the science through the creation of great things.

If you are producing cringe, you're not a communist, you're not a Marxist, you don't know the science.

Truth.

That's truth.

Be a communist.

If a person does all these things over a period of time, he must be a communist.

Like, it's so much more powerful when you have all these red flags and a US flag, because then it's like you're not.

Being performative.

Having so much U.S.

flags is performativity.

Whereas if you only have one, it is a cognitive dissonance that it can induce in people that's very powerful, which is more like.

So that they don't they're having all these red flags, but they don't fundamentally hate their country.

They don't actually hate their country.

They just have discovered something more powerful than what our country currently is or or is dominated by or appears as.

Like that's so much more powerful.

It's almost like kill them with kindness type of thing.

Like for example,

You know who everyone should learn from?

Mean girls

Women

You know how women insult each other?

They don't, if you're a woman and you go up to a girl or a woman, sorry, you're a woman, you go up to another woman who you don't like or you have an issue with, and you go up to her and you say, You're an ugly, retarded bitch, and I hate you.

When women talk like that to each other,

The one who says that, she i immediately loses.

she loses.

But when they go up to each other and they go and they smile and they go, Oh, your hair is so pretty.

What a great hair you have.

And then you walk past and the woman goes, Oh, thanks.

Bitch, I hate you.

Why why?

That's what we need the US flag for.

It's like we we don't have

We're over it.

We are over the United States.

We're over it.

That's our message.

Our message is that we're over it.

Our message is not that we're cheerleaders of the United States because the United States is dead.

The message is that we're over it and you don't bother us and we're okay with it.

Now do you understand?

Whoever is triggered by a US flag is not gotten over it, and you are therefore conquered by that flag.

When we are okay with it and it doesn't bother us and we've made our peace with it, Islam, we've made our peace with it, we've made our peace with the USA.

Do you understand the difference between us saying we have made our peace with the USA versus we have resentment and anger toward the USA because it disappointed us?

We're done protesting, we're not protesting, nobody has disappointed us, nobody has embittered us.

We've made our peace with this outdated formation of the American nation, and we're moving forward.

You say down with the USA.

No, you don't understand what I'm saying.

Ya Allah

The cult it's not gonna you're this is not this cult is not getting any less cult light anytime soon.

The cult leader is the only one who has wisdom.

It's like any time I say something, so in need of guidance are the cult members.

We don't say we don't need to say that.

The USA is dying.

When you say down with USA, you're protesting something that's already killing itself.

You don't need to protest something that's already killing itself.

We don't we don't need to subjectively

It's like, you know the way that you're coping when let's say, for example,

Let's say you're in a room, room temperature, and there's ice.

There's a glass of ice in front of you.

And then you look at the glass of ice, and then it's melting, and you go, Yeah, melt!

We hate you, ice!

Melt, melt, melt, melt!

It's like what you're doing is subjectively coping over the fact that it's melting anyway, and it doesn't care if you cheer it up.

Like you're assuming you have control to say, no, no, no, don't melt.

Even if you were begging on your knees, praying for the ice not to melt, it wouldn't change nothing.

So by cheering for it to melt, you are reasserting a level of illusory, subjective control over the thing that does not exist.

But when you say, I've made my peace with you, ICE, I take from you what I can take and what must be taken, and I go forward on a new basis, you have made your peace, Islam.

You have made your peace, you have been made whole.

That's what Islam means.

You have made your peace.

You have given way and you have made your peace, and you move on without bitterness or resentment.

So this is the truth.

Mm-hmm.

Yeah.

Y'all know what time it is.

It's time for Marx Austria.

It's time to fire up those brain cells, drink a little bit of coffee, and let's see what they have in store for us today.

Question number one.

May 5th is Karl Marx's birthday.

What is the main thing that Marx got right?

Is it everything?

By the way, guys.

Am I right?

Okay, let's focus.

Is it A, the working class must rule?

B, that the capitalists produce all value through their application of capital.

C, that workers produce less value than they are paying.

In an alternative timeline,

We could have very much helped with media.

We could have really helped with the media game.

Like, it's a shame.

Let's say that the whatever the 32nd National Convention where ACP was formed, let's say that it didn't, let's say that they didn't shut down Petition 5.

And it was like, we would have really put them on the map when it comes to the media game.

It's quite sad for them.

Uh I mean that sincerely, you know.

This is not good media that they're doing.

We would have like this would not be allowed in ACP.

We would say it's not engaging, it wouldn't work.

What the hell is Joe saying here?

Socialism is not about identity.

It is about class.

But maybe you didn't notice.

Class is an identity.

Comrade Joe Sharon today.

And yes, the genius of Marx was that he demonstrated that the struggle between capitalists and workers over the division of the workday, that is, who gets the profit, is the basis of class struggle.

But that class struggle is marked by a racist and sexist social division of labor in which people of color, women, LGBTQ, the disabled are paid less and treated less than by capitalists.

To unite the class, we've got to address these inequalities.

That's why Lenin said work.

I'm not going to lie.

Workers and oppressed peoples unite.

To do so doesn't take from white workers.

We need to take from capitalist profits.

But it's a good starting premise.

I mean, it's not a bad starting point.

Socialism is not about identity.

It's about class.

Yes.

But maybe you didn't notice.

Class is an identity.

I don't agree with that at all.

Hey look, he's defending Chris Malls from the Jacobin hit beat.

Former Amazon union organizer Chris Malls was criticized in a disrespectful way in a recent Jacobin article reviewing his new book.

Don't the socialist editors at Jacobin realize that in Marxism there's something called the national question and that perceived racial insensitivity destroys class unity?

It's not complicated.

This is your comrade Joe speaking out.

And Jacobin's review, while critiquing lapses in organizing, also very unfortunately draws on stereotypes about flashy jewelry and convertibles.

Did you see that I'm going in the Hoifur mod?

I put it in original content and then we're going to do TikTok debates.

I mean, don't everybody deserve judgment by our peers?

Now I don't work out there, but I know people who did and do and there's room for criticism, but come on.

Former Amazon Union organizer Chris Smalls was criticized in a disrespectful way in a recent Jacobin article.

Don't the socialist editors at Jacobin realize that in Marxism there's something called the national question and that perceived racial insensitivity destroys class unity?

It's not complicated.

You know, in in principle I don't disagree with that.

You know racial insensitivity is not a term I like because it's HR speak, but if you're talking about I like respect, you know.

I don't disrespect people because of their race.

Give people the respect, make sure people are respected.

But then you have to s apply that to a standard of reasonableness.

But in principle I don't disagree.

Like you can't say that there's these microaggressions that don't exist, but they do exist because I you know you have to be reasonable, but

Okay.

Hassan Piker recently said that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a catastrophe, and he was right.

Hey, this is your comrade Joe talking.

His comments, however, caused both liberals and conservatives to go b nannas.

I know, it's like Joe

I think he just hates me personally.

Is it that's what he that's what it is?

He just hates me.

Like he could agree with everything we think, but he's always just hated me.

He just always hated me.

He just always hated Hazaldin because he thought I was with Caleb Maupin.

Which, okay, Caleb's gone now.

If Taryn is gone and now Caleb is gone, isn't that a wonderful exchange?

Caleb is gone, Taryn is gone.

And what differences remain between us now?

These two people we net we who hijacked

Our vision

How could he, they said, how could he not, I say.

Just look at the facts.

You got MAGA at home.

You got war in the East.

You got war in the West.

However, in addition to all of that, what was set back?

Was the very concept that was essential to the doctrine of Marx.

The notion that working class people should rule, that we should have control over our lives.

Yes, there were serious deficiencies, crimes even in democracy in the form of Soviet Union, but what replaced it was hardly any better.

No one taught us how to rule the first time around.

I'll tell you something though: this time we have drawn the lesson and we are going to get it right.

Hassan Pikachu said that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a catastrophe, and he was right.

Joe you know what Joe is like is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

It's it's this.

I want to tell you that it's like a Greek tragedy.

You want me to tell you the self-fulfilling prophecy about Joe Sims?

Uh

We'll get into this in a second, but the self-fulfilling prophecy with Joe Sims is like: I was an innocent.

Twenty four twenty five year old

I was young and innocent and I said I would like to help make the CPUSA great.

And Joe thought I was gunning for leadership.

I never wanted to be leader.

I never wanted, I never intended to be chairman of anything.

And he immediately saw me as a threat.

I wanted to help, but he saw me as a threat.

I was never a threat.

Actually, I'm a very loyal person.

Um but he saw me as a threat.

And then I was like pushed into this position basically by history where I became the leader of a of the of the Communist Party, something I never intended, by the way.

And it's like it was a self fulfilling prophecy.

There's an alternate timeline where I would have been a loyal

Soldier of Joe Sims, just for the Communist Party, that's it.

But he saw me as a threat.

And thereby cemented the inevitability of

Confrontation

A C P is moving west.

It's crazy, this is actually like part of our prophecy.

That this will happen.

Haydar.

What the hell?

This was from last year?

Hi, how this is like, why does Hoi 4 predict the future?

It's actually crazy.

Hi, Dar.

That is something I would call it.

I would call it something like that.

Uh lifted on high wheels each as tall as man, clothed in steel, armored fighting platform, flamethrower at its flank.

That is something I would call it.

Timur has awakened.

A C V Wow It feels like this could happen.

Feels like it could happen.

I saw the uh Jackson is the general.

The party and the paramilitaries

Wow, Regional Commander Jackson and then

The ACP supplies the muscle.

Need a syndicalist strike put down because they're impeding the war effort.

Kinda true.

It's like hyperstition, you know?

It's hyperstition.

What can you say?

Hyperstition.

Okay, let's start the tic-tac debates.

And my by the way, every time s people are confused about this, whenever I open Tic Tac, this screen will freeze and my microphone will fail.

It's going to happen, okay?

Just so you don't panic and freak out, when I open Tic Tac, the mic I have to unplug it, plug it back in, also my screen is gonna fail.

So let's turn the virtual webcam on.

So whatever my freeze face is gonna be when it freezes, opening TikTok right now.

Can you hear me?

Yes or no, can you hear me?

Can you hear me?

Can you hear me?

Jesus Christ.

Can you hear me?

Yo, ones are you gonna

Once you can hear me.

Okay, loud and clear.

Perfect.

Okay, now I have to fix the camera.

Alright.

Okay, now we're good.

But that was a great thing where he was pointing.

That would have been great to keep it like that, you know?

So.

Um tic-tac is

Quite live.

No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no.

Okay.

Alright, so

Stalin Stopkey added five to the water chest has a side social ticket to never worry on 50 viewers 350 views for the car.

Thank you for the ten.

But I don't know what

How would I do that?

I'm you know, the TikTok live, the problem with it is that I'm stuck on it, so I don't have the power actually to you know go to other streams and request.

I can only host, I can't join them on the desktop version, so that's a major obstacle.

Gorilla Zuns

Up's on the run

We whine, we whine, we whine.

Opinion on Barista Socialists

Have you considered blood plasma sales to fund infrared?

Yeah, that's literally like a Count Dracula.

Like, it's like the meme where there's a speech bubble and it's like a vampire.

It's like a vampire is in my chat.

You know?

This like literal like cartoonish

Vampire

Like the scariest thing I've ever heard of, and genuinely a terrifying idea.

Opinion on the walk

It means nothing any more.

You know, the true woke person is the one who is awake.

And no one is more awake.

F P S go ahead.

Yo, Hawz.

I thought it was pretty funny when you and uh Nick School Destiny way back in the day, you're a real G.

But Nick lied to him.

Have a good night.

Completely lied about everything he believed in and what he said.

Go watch that encounter and you see Nick Fuentes saying things like, No, I'm not racist, I don't believe in racial division, I'm anti-capitalist, I love Stalin.

You know, he was talking about he was using a lot of left wing talking points.

And I was like, I'm not gonna

You know, oh, you are what you say, that's it, you know, and I just took it at face value, but

Compare that to what he says now, it's crazy.

Uh, notice I didn't even know who he was, really.

You know, I give everyone a fresh chance to prove who they are.

Bees, go ahead.

No.

Yo, what's up?

Destiny's a clown girl.

Why are we talking about destiny tonight?

Has something happened?

Workers will own the means of production one day.

Uh, is this like an AI something?

What are we talking about?

What's going on?

This is an AI.

No dude.

Just wanted to go on here and say what's up.

Okay, what's up?

What's going on?

Are you uh

Can I get the banks tonight?

That's I just I just hop on the line.

Okay, what's the debate?

Let's hear it.

Capitalism is fascism.

Okay, anything else?

What happened?

They're gone.

That's it.

That's it.

Difference between CPSA and ACP.

The CPSA is an appendage of the Democratic Party and the ACP is an independent Communist Party.

It's kind of that simple.

Go ahead, uh, user one million.

Uh user one dot pause against text for this what I what is this echoing thing going on?

You need to fix that.

Uh okay, can you hear me now?

Yes, I can hear you.

Hey, um, what do you have against sex workers?

I'm not the one who has anything against them.

I think the phenomena has to be eradicated, as all Marxists have since the time of Marx.

Okay, but um I mean sex workers were everywhere during like the time when um you know the revolution in the USR happened and it was a the phenomena was combated and eradicated oh okay but was it was that done in its inception though when the state was like barely a state tried I mean actually Lenin he said something if you want to talk about who has a problem with them read what Lenin said in the telegraph oh no okay okay I get that but there was like at least still a pragmatic compromise right but it just I just no it wasn't they didn't have the state capacity to eliminate all social vices and evils unfortunately okay all right but but in this instance like where there's not even any sort of cohesion for for any any any sort of communist politics don't you think it kind of just like look look your private business it's between you and God I have nothing to do with it I'm talking about as a social phenomena as a social phenomena it's an evil and Marxists have always believed in its full elimination it's as simple as that aren't you afraid that maybe this kind of creates hesitancy in your own movement in terms of the long-term goals of the Communist Party what um that basically like um I mean in general it's true that you yourself are no different than like a prostitute right functionally in your relation to labor production whatever and everyone's just like that's ridiculous the imperial force ridiculous it's just an absurdity why why do you say that why it's just a ridiculous childish thing to say why every streamer is basically just like i mean i mean they're kind of basically just like but not not that though you know it's just like ridiculous so every journalist is that everyone who writes on a paper is the same what is different about live streaming versus communicating through the written form nothing fundamentally right so what you're saying is just an absurdity you know uh it doesn't even make any sense i think they disconnected or something it's completely incoherent

Like someone who is selling the fundamentals of humanity, the fundamentals of your human being for sale, c commodifying and selling literally the thing that where other human beings come from, like reproduction.

You're selling that as a commodity, the fun like the fundamental innermost reality of your subjectivity, versus somebody who is being compensated for

And being patronized to share their views and express their views like an art even if you're an artist who's paintings or music or something, is that the same thing?

Of course it's not.

One is that you're selling a product fundamentally, you're still selling a product of your work.

Or you're being patronized to continue spreading a message.

Not sell and commodify the fundamental aspect of your innermost being as a human being, you know?

It's completely ridiculous.

These uh equivalences are just a result of a nihilistic, destructive society.

People can't they don't know what is real, what is not real and

It's quite ridiculous actually.

So let's um Luther go ahead and

Hey Haas.

What's going on?

Dude, Fuentes view mods you, you little goat fucker.

Okay, so you're just gonna say bad words to restrict me?

By the way, you know, the some there was a left liberal who got upset.

Uh I personally think that person was a homosexual.

There's nothing wrong with that, but you should make peace with that.

Because you're basically talking about another man having more viewers than me and you

Praising that as though it means anything.

For you, it means you have some kind of admiration for this other man, which I do think is sexual in nature, right?

So I do think you are a repressed homosexual and you need to make peace with that.

You know, there's this whole society that will accept you if you make peace with this.

But uh what a ridiculous thing to say.

Someone has more views, what does that have to do with anything?

What does that have to do with you?

You're the one speaking to me.

Go ahead.

Alice, can you hear me?

No.

Oh.

Like, what does that have to do with you?

What does it have to do with you?

What about you?

You're the one speaking, you know?

Pause.

Please deb.

Hey, please debate Nick Mattel.

He's live right now.

I can't escape.

I can only host.

I can't go to other people's streams on desktop.

Requesting is live.

We'll rate him or something.

Oh, my God.

Are you literally like, I'm going to crash out?

I cannot escape hosting my own.

I can't go to other people's live and request.

I can only host my own if I'm on desktop.

And I told you that, and then you just said it again.

I told you that.

And then you go, oh, no, go, go, request it.

Buddy, I literally told you on desktop, it's not possible.

This is the third time first uni donated 10.

Take your $10 back for wasting my time like this.

It's not even worth $10.

Go ahead.

What?

Uh

Are barista socialists lumpin'?

What a fascinating question.

Go ahead, define all the terms of that proposition and break it down according to a logical syllogism.

Like woke service worker socialist creative intellectuals that are trying to get through school or.

What do you this immense immense interest?

Everyone is so fascinated by this topic.

Okay, what on it?

But what what am I supposed to say about it?

Just speak your mind about what you're asking me.

Are Breesa socialists lumpin'?

What?

This is just brain rot.

How do you have?

You know what I think?

I watched the movie The Backrooms, and you just, it's about brain rot.

You go to the back rooms, and it's kind of resembles something, but it was clearly a copy of something.

And I just think that of all the years of the barista discourse, it's like somehow the back rooms took that, and you came from the back rooms that was like monitoring all the barista discourse for two years.

And, like, this is the output, like, an LLM struggling to copy a real discourse that happened.

And now there's a literal backrooms thing or an AI clarify because you're like, you're like, are they socialist lumping?

And it's like, you're just jumbling a lot of different words and phrases together that are vaguely associated with that.

Those words you're using, they're vaguely associated with the discourse, but not quite put together in the way that you're suggesting that it was.

And it's just like you are the backrooms of the barista discourse.

This is the backrooms.

But okay, our service workers that produce nothing and do nothing and their um liberals, are they are they bumping?

Uh what does them being liberal have to do with being lumpin'?

Because they're liberal or whatever.

They're working.

It's literally the back rooms.

It's literally the back rooms.

It's literally back rooms barista discourse from the back rooms.

It's crazy.

It's actually crazy.

But no, are they lumping?

Because they don't produce anything, right?

Uh n not necessarily, no.

No, I wouldn't say they're lumping actually.

But why?

'Cause lumping is something else.

Lumping means something else.

But you actually said in the past that they're like drug addicts and they're homeless?

Mm, I didn't say I said lump in our drug addicts and our homeless usually, yes.

It's very common.

No, but you said, um, what's it?

Um, riders on strike.

Yeah, that's not the same as a barista.

Well, I mean like the class, you know, like the I said yeah, writers are not proletarians, they're not working class.

No, they're not.

They're petty bloke.

What about like a nose ring like woke?

The nose ring has nothing to do with anything at all.

It has no significance at all.

It has no, it literally means nothing.

Alright, um yeah, see ya.

Okay, that was riveting.

That was one of the most important.

Fascinating.

That's quite a comment.

Among comments, that's quite one of the comments.

that we can infer are possible

For sure it is a comment.

It is a comment.

Yes, a comment.

For sure.

Mm-hmm.

Alright.

Geoffrey, go ahead.

Hello, hello?

Yeah.

Hey, Comrade, how's it going?

I'm going great.

What's going on?

Can't bad things be true?

What?

Can bad things be true?

So what is the content of Marxism that is true, according to you?

Did I not come through, okay?

No, you need to again bad stuff?

Mm.

Can that bad stuff be true?

Zoraster thought so.

He thought that it was all from Ahriman, who was a real entity responsible for the evil in the universe.

That's cool.

So you think Marxism is like Ahriman?

I love that guy.

Okay, you don't.

So you're not educated?

Oh, no, I repeated the third grade.

Ah.

How about you?

I feel like I'm repeating special education every day when I say that.

Wait, did you go to one of those specialist education teams?

I did five to the blockchain.

How did you all convince Mokiaps to help you?

I wanted to go to ones.

I think they have some for Uyghur Muslims in China right now that are pretty sweet.

You just got the whole dialogue tree of like brainwashed NPC.

You know, I'm surprised you're not a bot.

I usually see people like you on X and I think you're bots, but you're a real person who thinks this.

That's crazy.

Yeah.

The dialogue tree, we actually call that English.

No, we call it botted language of uh AI LLMs that are trained to read out State Department, uh Department of Defense scripts about the world and foreign policy and domestic policy.

So it just sounds like you just like have it all

Inputted, and you're just got the whole dialogue tree of everything.

The oy, what's the oyster Muslims?

We've got the thing about Tibet.

That's a forgotten one, right?

And then we're probably gonna.

What did I say about Tibet?

Yeah, somewhere along the lines, it's gonna be about like uh uh you know Kamir Rouge.

Oh, that's it.

Okay, that's interesting.

Then we're gonna talk about Lenin and Stalin and the gulags.

Okay, and then we're gonna talk about the uh Gulag archipelago.

Oh, that's okay.

Then we're gonna talk about Brock Classic USSR propaganda posters that advised uh families to not eat their children because of starvation.

Okay, and then we're gonna say everybody has the same capacities, like no one's there's no hierarchy of capacity.

Oh, yeah, someone totally said that.

Yeah, that's something and then we're gonna say resurgent is just as valuable as a ditch digger.

Yeah, that's something we're gonna say black book of communism: 100 million deaths.

Then we're gonna say where has 200 where has socialism or communism ever worked?

Then you're gonna say everywhere it hasn't worked perfectly yet, but it will if you just do it this one time it's already working perfectly everywhere, yeah.

And then you're and then I'm gonna say, Well, if you believe it, why don't you go there?

Okay, since you're not interested in any like because I know listen, you're fundamentally a brainwashed cattle who will not be open to discussion.

So, my question to you is, what will you do about it?

I'm a communist, I'm not going to stop.

You're not going to debate or scrutinize any of these false things that you believe.

You just come here to repeat them and spew them to me.

What's the false thing I said?

Everything you said was false.

Name one thing.

When have communists said that everyone has the same abilities?

Communism.

Yeah, show that.

If the workers own the means of production, that's an equal distribution.

Why?

That doesn't allow market capitalism.

Even if there was an absence of market capitalism, how does that imply this was there are rare skills?

What?

Because there are rare skills.

So, how does capital arise in proportion to skill?

Do you think Elon Musk is $1 trillion more skilled than the average person in a city?

Skills need something called incentives.

No, no, no.

Let me ask you something.

Do you think Elon Musk is $1 trillion times more skilled than an average person?

Obviously.

Then you are, you are, oh, holy glaze, bro.

You are literally cattle.

And why didn't you?

You actually think Elon Musk is one trillion times more skilled than another person.

I think we have math to prove that.

Yeah, because he has more money and money is just equal to skill.

Why doesn't you get more money?

So if someone comes from like a hereditary class of landlords who just arbitrarily own that landowner.

Hereditary class of landlords.

Yeah, who arbitrarily own that land and that gave them the starting capital to get their foot in the door, which is most of the U.S.

ruling class.

Wrong.

80% of millionaires aren't born millionaires.

But they come from generational wealth in their families.

No.

Yes, they don't.

80%.

Look up the study.

Look up the study.

80% of millionaires.

They have to study how social mobility is a myth and that actually.

That's a theory.

If social mobility is a myth, then how do we become the world's superpower?

They've conducted studies that people that are descended from ruling class families hundreds of years ago still are more likely to be wealthy than the average person.

So there's never been this leveling process that you're doing.

Never been.

So then where did all these millionaires come from in America?

Usually it's a combination of having a hereditary background in the ruling class.

Usually it's not hereditary.

Just because your parents weren't doesn't mean your grandparents weren't or their parents weren't.

Wait, wait, wait.

So your grandparents were wealthy, but then they were poor, your parents.

No.

Somehow.

No, because they go to the extreme.

They did like a skip jump over on the money.

The point you would have to make is that that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life.

The point you would have to make is that 80% of millionaires came from poor backgrounds, not from non-millionaires.

I'll give you the citation if you want.

Okay.

Did they come from poor backgrounds or just non-millionaire backgrounds?

Because usually they have some kind of starting capital that that gives them an advantage.

Usually, because it's all chance anyway.

So any of these small advantages make a big difference usually actually.

This guy really believes in social mobility, it's crazy.

Hey, look, I did the work for you.

Okay.

Study summary: 10,000 participants, 8 out of 10, invested in their 401k.

The top five.

So did they come from poverty or not?

Well, not millionaires.

79% did not receive any inheritance at all from their parents or other families.

Oh, shit.

I'm calling BS.

Is that what you said, or is that the opposite of what you said?

I'm calling BS that they got zero.

Oh, this is BS.

Maybe they just randomly agree with me.

That's odd.

No, I'm calling BS that there was zero.

Of course, you're calling.

79% got nothing.

Of course you're calling BS.

I will literally put my dick on a guillotine held up by God.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Prove it.

You have to put.

I don't know if we can find.

I don't think we can.

I think you have a guillotine, maybe a nail clipper.

Okay.

If I, you have to put something in.

I just said what I would put in.

What do you put in?

Open your mouth.

I'll put it in.

That's you're literally a homosexual.

That's crazy.

Hey, I thought you guys supported homos.

I never said anything about support or not, but I just did.

Hey, we're just as equal I have a policy.

I can't oppress you now because you're an oppressed group.

Because we're woke now.

So how can I oppress you?

How can I use my privilege and oppress you?

I can't.

Immediately this conversation goes haywire because

See, you wanna have a bet like that where I put my dick in the dick guillotine?

Then you have to put some money down or something.

You have to sacrifice something because I'm sacrificing a whole lot.

'Cause I'm sacrificing a whole lot.

Tortapound a 3000 added five to the war chest solidarity with the Barista.

I don't even need to look anything up.

I know that's wrong.

80% got nothing?

No.

That's not true.

That's literally impossible.

Like getting nothing at all from inheritance is actually rare.

For a human being to experience their life and get like nothing at all, even if it's very little, nothing?

That's extremely improbable, even for the general population, let alone millionaires.

By the way, most of the advantages don't even come from directly getting millions from your parents.

Most of the advantages are a consequence of uh

Your family's connections, who do you know?

People who don't know this, they don't understand the basic rules.

Of how society works.

It's everything is about who you know.

And yeah, trust funds are not inheritance.

It's ridiculous.

It's ridiculous.

What these people are saying.

This person name is Violent.

Go ahead the violin.

Yo, what's up?

How's my connection?

What do you want to say?

Dude, I got a lot to say, actually.

I think this is.

Okay, to be honest, I think you're getting screwed over by the people that join your live and they just talk about bullshit.

Sorry about that.

Sucks.

But I mean like to just like quickly talk about the guy's last point, I think like one of the things that he talked about was there's no incentive for people with rare skills to you know do work and improve their country.

And I think that's just not yeah, exactly.

I agree.

I think it's a really weird weird to think about it that people don't help each other out of you know some kind of like common desire a common wealth.

What are we debating?

Nothing.

I'm not trying to debate you because I just think you're an interesting person and I want to talk to you.

It's a debate space.

It's not a.

Conversation.

Say debate space.

Soul theory, go ahead.

Yo.

Oh there's an echo.

Okay, that's not my problem though, 'cause I can't hear it.

So what's going on?

Yeah, I don't think Marxism is true.

Okay, why not?

Yeah, I don't think the commitments is pretty good either.

Okay, what's your argument?

Yeah, I don't think that dialectical materialism is true.

I also don't think I don't think.

Yeah, if Marxism is true then Marx labor theory value is true.

I negate the consequent.

That's a valid uh modus tollens.

Okay, so you're not making any argument at all.

Okay, I gotta say, you came on gibbering and babbling.

You say this is why X, Y and Z, here's Y.

And now you're gibber you're speaking gibberish.

You're speaking gibberish.

Modus Tullens.

Literally shove it up your

Shove it up, yours.

What are you talking about?

You come and make an argument.

You don't say this nonsense speaking babble to me.

This is not an analytical philosophy course on a logical syllogism you're putting on a piece of paper.

You're speaking to a human being in front of human beings, make an argument.

No, that's not an argument, actually.

When you bracket everything and turn it into a modus tollens or whatever, that's not an argument.

You make an argument.

You say, why?

I don't think Marxism is true because I don't think it's true.

Okay, what's your why?

Like, what's your argument?

Nothing?

Okay.

Hedonist, Go Ahead, what a terrible name.

Oh why don't you like my name?

Go, what do you want?

Okay, I'm just curious why you're offended by my name, sir.

Because you're a a creepy name and you sound creepy as well.

Why is hedonist creepy?

Okay, what do you want?

I think you're just a prude and you're a boomer.

Yeah, why should I why should I be a Marxist?

Yeah, I'm not here to convince you of anything.

You have to come here with the intent to debate something.

Why do I deal with this?

It's like it's like a.

I'm the one who has to deal with the backrooms, the bizarro world.

We got all these characters, these weird people.

Go ahead.

I would like to debate a fasciser, a privatizer, a very nice.

We're not doing this again.

All right, Roberto, go ahead.

Yo, when Jackson Hinkle went to Iran, the low-key made me cry.

Okay.

What do you want to debate about?

Um should the means of production be owned by the state?

Some of it should okay, but like a state run by the proletariat, yeah.

And what does that entail?

The resurrection of the Mongol Empire.

Uh

I just left.

Okay.

I don't remember this person anymore.

Yo.

House.

You're asking me?

Yeah.

Okay.

So I think Barista says in writers.

Oh, this is the barista guy.

Now I remember.

So is there no one else?

Roberto uh wants to return.

Go ahead, Roberto.

Person's name is Vital Transgender.

Go ahead.

Haz.

Haz, bro.

Are you are you for national Sharia law or international Sharia law?

It's just incredible.

Like you don't even know what to expect anymore, you know?

You don't even know what to expect.

We have no one requesting.

I'm getting fucking bored.

And I am quite hungry actually.

So someone needs to entertain all of us.

They called us to war, we received the call

Okay, uh Frederick, go ahead.

Uh sorry, I'm watching a movie, give me a minute.

Okay.

Is that better?

Okay, what do you want?

Um, I have a question.

Okay.

Um what's your thoughts on libertarian Stalinism?

Uh what is that?

Wasn't that what you created?

Okay, so how did I create it?

Uh you you said Stalin was a libertarian.

Really?

What was the context?

The context was that he had um allowed for the clocos markets for the peasants in Soviet Russia.

And um he got rid of the kulaks because they were landlords that were um basically um taking all the um grain.

And also the

After Stalin, um, Khrushchev uh centralized everything and ruined uh Soviet agriculture.

No, the main argument was that Stalin used the centralization of power and into his authority as a way to basically elevate the participation of the majority of people into governance in ways that came at the expense of the bureaucracy, doing what he could to promote as much as he could more autonomy and uh

basically getting the bureaucrats off of the people's back.

And uh, unfortunately, people don't appreciate this fact and don't understand the dynamics.

So, we have to use some memes to get people's attention so that they actually take oh, yeah.

Also, uh, Ron Paul Mausum is included in this.

Okay, so what?

That's I think that comes from Logo.

Yeah.

Okay.

So what else?

We also need to make one for uh North Korea because of the whole taxes thing.

Yeah, you're boring me.

A lot.

Tell by arm yawning.

Go ahead.

Yo, can you hear me?

Yes.

Alright, sick.

So I'm a business owner.

Am I like

Getting set to the gulags.

No, I just uh my yacht business is gonna uh take your business in the merger.

Okay.

But I no, like serious question though, like I own a yacht business.

It's very big and we're just gonna blow up your business into the yacht.

That's not what I'm asking.

But I'm asking like um I guess like what's wrong with owning a business?

Nothing morally.

It's not mor it's not immoral, if that's what you're asking.

No, but you're a communist, no, don't you believe like.

Um you like and and you don't agree with the financial system?

And stuff like that.

And you think I'm like the bourgeoisie, right?

Well, what do you do?

Um, I run like a construction company.

Okay.

I I hire people under me to do the work and I take a profit.

So so that's like I can't do that if I want to be a communist.

Uh you can't do that in a future society in which such things would not be happening anymore.

So you don't think like okay, then why why like do you think what I'm doing is morally wrong?

No.

So then why would you want to establish your own communist utopia if like what I'm doing is fine?

Because it's not i immoral for an individual to do, but it is uh immoral at the level of society.

I'm sorry.

So I understood what you said, but I don't understand what you meant.

What do you mean immoral of society?

I'm sorry.

Well, for society to conform to a moral principle, which would be the general welfare of the majority of people, a society in which the principle of governance, including with respect to economics, is made to uplift the majority and benefit society and benefit the people, you know, and ra accelerate the productive forces and raise the general standard of living, give more people access to education and the basic means of acculturation and so on and so on and free time, then the principle of private property cannot prevail.

And moreover, the principle of private property is very

much has developed in such a way that it

Is already socialized.

It already depends on government regulation.

It depends on a complicated web of recognition and contractual relationships presided over.

You've got a galaxy.

I mean, like, the there's no such thing as real private property anymore when you think about it.

I mean, there is institutionally as the governing principle of society through capital, but it's like.

You don't really own it.

It's more like you are allowed, like you have permissions.

Yeah, pretty much.

And they can take it away.

Exactly.

And then you're proposing, well, now it's the people that own it.

And there's no.

No, I'm proposing that.

I'm proposing that we begin immediately with a dual-track system where, yes, much of the means of production are going to be entrusted in a direct form of common ownership that is under the state.

So this is mainly energy, this is mainly natural resources and raw materials.

And then on the other hand, the ability for decentralized free association in the form of social entrepreneurship is allowed to take place, which will organize and allocate these resources in a way that, you know.

Um

Is based on

The principles of civil society, like organically and spontaneously.

So, you know, I believe in a centralized planned economy, but also a decentralized room for decentralized experimentation and so on and so on.

So, you can have like your average entrepreneur that, like, like me, or like an Asian family that owns like a gas station or whatever.

Yeah, but yeah, but it wouldn't, we're getting to a point.

I mean, even Elon Musk says this, although he's kind of dumb, where it's not going to be capitalistic.

Entrepreneurship means like a venture.

You're just going to engage in this organized type of economic activity.

And it wouldn't be based on profit.

You know, it would be based more on an information society.

Inputs and outputs would be measured more in a more directly social way.

And you know

It's like, oh, you know Jimmy put in a lot of work, Jimmy gets a lot of recognition.

He wouldn't just get a lot of money out of it.

Yeah, he would get recognition and then, you know, even Marx talks about in the early stages of socialism you'd have things like labor vouchers where you get directly what you put in.

Um, that was like time off something, something of the equivalent of the labor put in was what Marx talked about directly.

But in any case, it's like um.

Yeah, we're talking about a fundamental reorganization of society on new lines, ultimately.

Do you think that'll happen?

Yeah, I think it's inevitable either way.

I mean, even though bourgeoisie are talking about it now.

That's fair.

Uh well I'm gonna go to bed.

All right for sure.

See ya.

Sure.

Price is already the perfect measurement of how much effort went into making something.

Hmm.

Yeah, you're right.

So when the when the inflation of uh eggs happened between twenty twenty and twenty twenty six,

That was because it's more effort that goes into making eggs, right?

You're so right.

Perfect.

It's perfect.

It is perfect.

Talking about perfection here.

Difference between ACP and CPSA CPSA is an appendage of the Democratic Party, that's the main difference.

Farabi, did I miss Farabi's?

Donation, did I miss that?

Robbie, what's up, man?

Did I miss that?

Did I miss Farabi dropping the five?

What's up, bro?

I see you, brother, what's up, what's up, what's up, what's up, what's up?

What's up?

It's a single metric that collapses multiple dimensions into a single number.

Okay.

We know that.

What's your point?

Na na na na na na na n na na na na na na.

Man, like my TikTok always does so well.

Uh when I

Upload slop.

Every time I

Where has communism worked?

Everywhere.

Worked everywhere.

Interesting thing about the calculation problem is like it's like this idea that price everything collapses into one number, right?

And then so how does everything get subjected to some kind of common measure?

In the absence of a commodity form, right, in the absence of exchange value.

And um

Because there will have to be some kind of common measurement.

And then I would say, what about Cantor?

Is it Cantor?

Cantor's Mathematics of the Infinite.

And that's what we should be talking about, actually.

Let me look it up.

Cantor, what is it called?

Or was it Godil No, it was Cantor, Cantor's theorem.

Uh about infinite sets, yes.

Set theory.

Yes.

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

So there are sets of sets and so on and so on.

Maybe in the higher phase of communism there still is some kind of uh not money, not price, but some kind of uh

Method of calculation

Which does ascribe um

Value, it's a bad word to say, relative to the common plan of society, you know, fulfilling the plan, there's a value metric.

But it's not of one set because as Cantor demonstrates, there are sets of sets, right?

So the value metric is continually being revolutionized and um

Even talking about

You don't even know what I'm talking about.

Like it wouldn't hold to be eternally true.

Every time there's a new plan

every time there's some kind of new um revolution in the productive forces, which will continue to be inevitable, the s set of values is completely changed continuously, right?

And it's kind of already the case now, you know, when you think about it.

But uh does a common calculation of the society presuppose some kind of unifying metric?

or standard with which to evaluate the relative significance of any given thing according to a common standard.

And the answer to that is an interesting one for Marxists.

But that doesn't have to be money.

That does not have to be money.

That's the thing, it doesn't have to be money.

But it also cannot be an eternal uh form of value either, right?

Can't be a value form.

So it would have to be a dynamic

Um

uh dynamic kind of relationship between the rational ends established by production and the way in which everything can be judged and qualified with respect to that, fulfilling that, you know.

The A C P doing Taylorism, no, it's not.

Alright, I think I'm gonna wrap up the tic tac.

I think we're done with the tic tac.

I think we're done with the tic tac.

Is Marxism Islam?

Yes, it is.

Goodbye.

Thank you.

relationships

Relationships, presiding over state.

I mean, like, there's no such thing as real private property anymore.

Colours to one they were seen that's called

B

You know when you think about it.

My TikTok is fucking dead, bro.

I need time to grow this shit.

I need the infrared renaissance.

To be able to uh

Post shit with volume

You know what my problem is?

You know what the problem with these like debates is?

I people ask me shit that I'm not interested in right now at this moment, and I just don't have a passion of talking about things that I'm not locked in thinking about right now, you know?

And I never really get interesting questions.

That's the thing.

The problem is I never get interesting questions.

Keynes Bandcore Interesting.

Oh, the bancor, the idea for uh

Currency like that, yeah.

Um

The thing about value form theory is that the idea is that the common measure of all commodities will disappear so far as civil society engages in the exchange of commodities for them, right?

But if we're talking about a central planning mechanism,

Under which everything is held to a common standard of like a a value form, but is which is not the eternal value form because it's continuously changing, you know.

Um, I'm gonna be honest, I've thought about it a lot and uh I haven't really come across, I thought about it, and it's like, well, look.

How can society coordinate just a pragmatic question?

Like, how could there be a coordination of all of the resources?

and labour of society in any kind of common way, without some kind of way of saying that this thing is objectively more valuable than this.

Um

More intrinsically.

Worth more than this, right?

But it's the principle from each according to their ability to each according to their need.

It's quite fascinating, actually.

But for a basic accounting efficiently like

If I know, for example, that every five years

Um

There's gonna be an unavailability of Emerald.

So now it's going to be available, right?

It's like it's more rational to gather it now versus two years from now, right?

Where it's going to be harder.

It's just like things like this: like when there are changes, even in the ability to access natural resources based on time and natural cycles and things that have nothing to do with the organization of labor at all, necessarily, there has to be a way to evaluate an efficient relationship with such things.

I'm talking about the higher phase.

No, I'm talking about the higher phase of communism.

Even in a higher phase of communism, how can you not have?

A way to um calculate

the relationship between the different factors of production.

and different things being produced.

There has to be calculation.

Planning and communism would have to involve calculation, some kind.

Well, in order to have calculation, you need to ascribe a numerical value to things.

The jewel and energy value.

Yes, maybe, maybe.

Who knows?

I've thought about that too.

It's really interesting.

Um

But it would have to be a something.

Now that something di doesn't have to be a value form, definitely doesn't have to be a price with money, but it would have to be a something that transcends every particular thing, just like the value form does.

Now it wouldn't be the value form, it wouldn't be money, but it would have to be something.

Right?

Watt hours, energy, yeah.

Energy is always the interesting one.

Energies, yeah, measuring it in joules or in energy is really interesting, but that would still be a common measure.

Remember that.

Do more streams on Marxism.

You wanna know the most terrifying thing?

Now we're going to have some really

Interesting thoughts.

Now that all the retards left.

The most terrifying thing for a secular subject to comprehend is.

Is that there is a purpose for why we're here.

And it's like, what do I mean by that?

Like

Whatever humanity is, like whatever this is.

It is about something more than us.

Why are we here?

What is our purpose here?

Like when you think about it

There's something cosmologically significant about human beings.

Yes, there is.

There's nothing in the universe we can observe that's like us.

Okay?

This is why the whole thing I watched the movie The Age of Disclosure, the new one, Steven Spielberg, and it's like.

You know how fascinating it is we have never encountered another intelligent being.

We have never, ever, ever encountered outside of humanity an intelligent being.

And we have therefore no way to prove to the all we have, the only alien is us, right?

The collective of humanity is an alien.

We don't have an alien, we don't have anything outside of us.

We have our subjectivity, we have other human beings, we have the sum total of humanity, but we have no what is intelligence.

Nobody reads Reza Nagaristani, his book Intelligence and Spirit, because nobody cares, but you should.

Because the question, the fundamentals of what cosmologically is intelligence, is the most important question in the world.

Okay, what is this?

What is it?

Cosmologically, what is it?

The most terrifying thing for a secular normal subject, just a neutral human being, a neutral modern subject, is the following revelation.

What is intelligence?

What actually is it?

If it's a thermodynamic principle of some kind, then we are facilitating something.

Like Nick Land says, we're here to facilitate an artificial general intelligence.

We're here to be a counter

A negentropic force of some kind.

It's purely thermodynamics.

Whatever it is, it's something that is cosmological, right?

And it's like it is something.

There's no way for it to be nothing.

It is something for sure.

It is something for sure.

Like maybe all of this culminates in some kind of cosmological cycle.

Whatever it is, there's a something going on.

That we cannot observe anywhere else in the universe to have any assurance about what it is.

Like, it's a something, but we have no fucking idea what it is.

We cannot have any certainty because we can't observe it anywhere else, right?

So, where do we fit in the cosmos?

We don't know.

No one knows.

It's actually a real, genuine, terrifying thing to think about.

And but to actually embrace that understanding and have a now-ness, it causes a kind of anxiety, I think, because it's like, well, there is clear there's this weight of yes, there's something we just don't know.

There is something though.

Like there's something, there's some reason.

There's something

We're not just here for nothing, like or we don't just attest to nothing.

Something we don't understand and is very extraordinary to us.

And it's just inescapable.

Whatever it is is inescapable.

That's the other thing.

Whatever it is is inescapable.

I'm gonna be honest, I've never bought into the aliens thing and I think it's a psyop, but I wanna ask you guys a question.

Why?

What is going on with this alien psyop?

Why is the government so invested in it?

Steven Spielberg has this disclosure movie, then the disclosure age of disclosure documentary that came out, then the White House is clearly hyping it up and alluding to it.

Why?

No, well, there's a deeply psychological reason for why it's being promoted.

It's very psychological, but like why?

Why is that happening?

And anyone who says it's about demons, I'm sorry, but you're just not intelligent to me.

Distraction.

I know and people everyone that's the obvious one is it's a distraction.

But who is designing this distraction?

Why this one in particular?

It's really fascinating what kind of psych psychological paradigm they're using for this.

And it's kind of scary to think about.

What is their psychological paradigm for this specific psyop?

Like that's my question.

Could be real.

Now that

That's fucking terrifying.

Like if it's real

What if intelligence is not rare in the cosmos?

What if the universe is abound with forms of intelligence we just don't understand, but the government does?

What if intelligence is just as common as water on Earth?

What if the universe is like intelligence in the universe is like water on earth?

It's that abound and it's just plentiful, it's everywhere.

Like, it's just everywhere.

It's not that there's other humanoids necessarily, probably, maybe.

But specifically, this thing that we call intelligence is everywhere.

You want to know who thought that was the case?

With a lot of conviction, and they did a lot of experiments which seemed to confirm it.

The Soviet scientific establishment.

Uh, at high levels in the Soviet military, the KGB and the um some rogue scientists or whatever, they they genuinely were very convinced of panpsychism.

They were very convinced that the universe is alive with intelligence somehow and

You know, there are ways that there's some kind of common psychic field or something.

I mean, they believe that shit.

They did.

I tend to think that it it's it's because of the limitations of Soviet Marxism that that they believed it, but how could I fucking know?

You know?

In any case, it's very spooky to think about that kind of shit.

Um, if there are aliens, okay, you want to know my esoteric take on aliens?

Shut up about demons, bro.

I'm sorry to yell at you, but like, holy fuck, you're making me cringe so hard.

Demons are aliens.

Alien bro, I don't want to hear that.

It's not true and I don't buy it.

Okay?

Uh I'll tell you what I think.

If in if aliens are real

I do not think they are

Um

I don't think that the way they would influence us is by literally fucking flying here on a fucking Boeing seven ninety seven.

I don't think they're literally flying here and they're like like literal like people.

who are just chilling, like physically coming here.

I think if aliens are somehow on earth or influencing us, they're doing it remotely.

They're doing it remotely.

They're they're they're channeling like, I don't know, some kind of psychic uh uh way to influence us psychically from afar.

and they're influencing our dreams, they're somehow hacking into our neural this is so schizo, but it's like if it's true that there's aliens somehow out there and they're fucking with us,

They're not fucking doing it.

By getting in a fucking spaceship and flying here, that's retarded.

Why would they do that?

My mic is fucked up?

No way.

No shot.

One's if we're good.

Okay.

But like they're not doing it by flying they're why would they you know how stupid that is?

Imagine you're an intelligent being in the universe.

and the way that you interact with us is like, I'm a pull up on them.

I'm a go pull up on them.

Think about the thousands of years ahead of us aliens would have to be.

Think about how they would have to be thousands of years ahead of us.

Why are we applying the Fordist paradigm or the Wright brothers paradigm of transportation to beings that would be thousands minimum ahead of us?

Why would they have to literally get into the equivalent of a Model T car that can fly?

Why would they get into the equivalent of our we're using a very primitive analogy?

We're saying, oh, they're gonna get in a vehicle to fly to us.

That's like a caveman would say,

Aliens, uh, you know, they they just have a big boat, a big canoe, and they're physically or they have a big horse, they're galloping toward us.

That's stupid, you know?

Like, um, we would have to rethink our understanding of space.

How can space be traversed and influenced?

I think that we're already in an age where we would should have a higher imagination.

Like information theory, for example, like things can travel across space and influence others without.

The reason I know the UFO thing is a psyop is because even human civilization has gotten to a point where we primarily influence one another remotely.

If I want to influence you, I don't literally get in a fucking plane and go to your house.

Even if I want to kill you nowadays, I'm not going on the battlefield and confronting you directly.

I'm sending a drone to do it of some kind.

Why do we have such a limited imagination?

That we say if aliens are here and they're visiting, they're literally getting in a plane and flying to us in first class.

It's an extremely retarded, primitive analogy.

What would make sense is that they're sending influences to us.

Or maybe they're not, or maybe there's nothing.

But we have to consider I mean it's an interesting question.

Statistically impossible for us to run into anything.

No, there's the Fermi paradox.

What are you talking about?

How could it be statistically impossible if the universe?

Annihilation type of aliens?

No, I don't think so.

I think that

I think aliens would not be

I think if you're truly an intelligent life form, I'm gonna say some scary ass shit right now.

If you're truly an intelligent life form and you have truly transcended to the point where you can do you have the technology to detect other life, what I think happens is that you acquire the abstraction of a principle or a meme.

What if aliens are literally memes?

What if tung tongue tung sohor?

Not a physical being, but the idea of tung tung tung sohor is actually an alien, like an intelligent being.

That is like colonizing our brains from afar.

That's some schizophrenic ass shit.

But it wouldn't be in a UFO like in a chariot coming to us.

Like they would ac it would be the abstraction of a principle.

Like when you get deja vu.

When you're at a place, you're like, Oh, I just felt like I've been here before.

It's like

You were planted with it.

I'm gonna make you schizo.

I'm so fucking dangerous.

Because I can entertain this shit and not take it seriously.

But I know for a fact my gorillas are flip a flip a coin and a gorilla will become a schizo.

I'm gonna fucking lay off of this because some of y'all are gonna take this shit too seriously.

You're not fucking ready to even entertain this shit.

Because you'll genuinely be bothered by it.

I don't give a fuck.

I don't, I'm not, this shit would could not bother me because, uh,

I understand that sometimes this is just a cope for us not to be able to comprehensively understand our own intelligence as a species.

What are memes?

What are other things?

I mean, they do belong to us.

But I entertain these things 'cause it's interesting to think about.

But some of y'all can't handle it and you'll be bothered by this and freaked out.

You're not ready.

Word it better to prevent a triggering a schizophrenic episode.

Let me tell you another thing.

I have another idea.

Sipposadas was a Trotskyite, right?

What if the true development of intelligence corresponds to more of a logic like socialism in one country?

Where aliens, if they could ever get to a point of being able to actually detect us, consciously choose not to intervene.

In the same way we have socialism in one country, they're like, well,

We need to let them get there and not intervene at all because it's none of our business and we don't care.

I've always thought that.

You know, if you want to know my unironic take, like the official infrared take on aliens.

My official take is that if they're so advanced that they surely

Have gone down the golden Stalinist path, and they fundamentally do not care about us.

They're locked in and focused on their own cultivation.

They don't.

Let me tell you what intelligence is.

Intelligence means you will try your best to expend as little, as little energy that you can focusing on others.

Provided that your obligations are met, that we can all be taken care of, and so on, in a shared community that you're in.

You never want to define yourself based on how you intervene toward others.

If you can ignore

Other planets, and just you will.

You don't want to.

You're not seeking out.

You're not trying to go and expand.

You're trying to cultivate.

You don't want to expand.

The principle cosmologically that makes sense is that you don't want more space.

More space is a sign of dumbness.

Just like Marx talked about the Confederacy.

The Confederacy needed more land because it could not cultivate industry, so it needed to accumulate by just expanding raw land, right?

True intelligence means with as little space as you can get, you can exploit more.

So you can do more with less.

Do you understand?

So truly intelligent beings.

are probably tiny.

They're probably smaller than a

An electron, if I'm being honest, like they've probably learned to shrink down.

What if there's been plenty of civilizations just on this planet alone, but they've shrunk down to a size that we would never be able to see?

Because the true principle, the true cosmological principle of intelligence is shrinking, doing more with less.

And then here's the beautiful part: Ready?

Are you ready for this?

I'm going to bomb you with dialectics.

Once if you're ready to be bombed with dialectics.

So while you're doing more with less,

You're doing much more with less.

You are like affecting the

Subatomic

Quantum fields around you.

And literally endangering the conditions on a macro level under which life emerges.

Like,

Although you're locked in and focussing on doing more with less,

The space around you starts to become defined by that.

And so there's a dialectic between the small and the big, where the big is indirectly, inadvertently influenced by that small cultivation.

A series of, think about like a million, million, million alien civilizations all around us cultivating the small space.

But on a macro level, it looks like a jungle to us.

It looks like a random, chaotic, but beautiful, harmonious nature.

That's just alive.

What if that's the universe?

More with less, but the space around you on a big level gets influenced by it indirectly.

And what if this solves all of the This is too high level.

Like this is too high level because I we would if we were to develop this, it'd be so interesting, it'd be like

Because this is how we would turn human labor, what we call intelligence, Hegelian intelligence.

We would turn that into a cosmological principle that explains the very fabric of the cosmos.

Like it explains why things would explain all of the quandaries of modern physics and gravity and all this kind of stuff.

It would be all based on dialectics.

You know, Ilyenkov tried to do this, but Ilyenkov was only focusing on thermodynamics.

He never thought about particle physics or quantum mechanics, right?

I don't know.

I'm just bullshitting right now.

Like, I have no fucking idea.

I'm just spit talk, you know, thinking.

Honestly, I've been hoping someone is gonna drop 20 subs.

I'm just kidding.

Anyway, guys, I'm ending the stream.

I'm gonna end the stream.

I'm gonna go sleep.

I hope you all have a wonderful time and understand I'm just bullshitting.

Like, none of this is serious.

Just thoughts, you know?

I'll see you guys.

See you hopefully Sunday.

Bye-bye.