🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

Been here before It's in my muscle memory, I'm pretty sure I recognize you, there is something in your eyes.

Won't let you get away tonight.

You

Wondering if you're around to catch me if I fall, if I come crashing in the wall.

Welcome, everybody.

If you don't know, I'm also streaming this to Kik, where you can see me on video.

It's kick.com/slash infrared.

I also have something of a new setup, or at least a new camera placement.

And we have a lot to talk about today.

We, first of all, have someone who we've arranged a debate with.

Whether or not they're going to show up to said debate is.

I suppose it's up in the air as of now because, like all of my opponents,

Mr.

Brandon has fled the scene.

He decided to back out at the last minute, claiming that he wants to debate Jackson instead, because Jackson has 2 million followers, which is kind of a common thing I've been hearing from right-wingers who engage in confrontations and who I challenge to debate, but then they claim, no, I want to debate Jackson, knowing that Jackson isn't going to debate them because he's too busy being like an international diplomat, forging connections and representing the American people on the international stage more generally.

People are truly terrified of me, it seems.

And I just don't understand why.

I guess I should pretend like I understand why.

I just kind of don't.

I don't bite.

You know, it's over the internet.

I'm not going to reach into my camera and slap you across the face.

I'm a civilized person, and I know I have had inflammatory debates in the past, but as long as you can keep things respectful, things are not going to escalate to the point where I'm going to yell at you.

But I don't suspect the reason people don't debate me is because of my inflammatory or hostile past when debating certain opponents.

I think the real reason people don't want to debate me is simply because I know what I'm talking about.

Probably one of the most knowledgeable people in this space.

And I'm not saying that to toot my own horn because knowledgeable people generally don't become influencers.

They kind of stick to the books and bury themselves in these books.

And they see themselves as above this plebeian popularity contest that is the internet and the clout game.

But I've managed to do something that not a lot of, let's say, intellectuals have done in the past, which is unite the two mediums.

I'm someone who happens to be extremely well read.

It has an extremely advanced grasp as far as American standards are concerned on theory.

And I managed to unite that with running a community online.

It's very intimidating to people because 99% of political influencers are just people who come on the internet and start opening their mouth without knowing what they're talking about.

But in any case, let's just get to the matter at hand that's of direct relevance to all of us.

We've been seeing some viral posts on X concerning the Bolsheviks.

And with the conflict that's going on in Gaza right now, Israel is a self-proclaimed Jewish state.

Zionism is an ideology of so-called Jewish nationalism.

Syop Shorty, thank you so much.

Appreciate you.

Many people get corralled and find it tempting to kind of boost these posts which demonize Jews by accusing them of being the Bolsheviks.

Many people aren't educated about who the Bolsheviks were or their history or the history of the Russian Revolution.

And they jump on this bandwagon, so to speak, many of them because of Israel's atrocities in Gaza, thinking that they're just kind of sticking it to the Jews.

Well, there's two problems with that.

In addition to recycling Nazi propaganda effectively, more importantly, as far as we're concerned, you're kind of poking the Bolshevik bee nest, so to speak, because we are the Bolsheviks in the modern context.

We infrared people, we so-called MAGA communists.

The Bolsheviks are for us.

Heroes, as far as our historical memory is concerned.

Not only are they heroes, but I would even go so far as to say they're sacred figures in our history.

And we're not going to allow our history to be trifled with by having people slander and malign them as somehow having anything to do with Zionism or some international conspiracy, not just because we're against whipping up hatred against Jews, but because we're here to clear and defend the name of the Bolsheviks.

Now, the first thing that might be on your mind, and the first thing I guess which confuses people as to why that is, is why do we find it so important to defend the Bolsheviks?

Why are the Bolsheviks so important to us?

Why are we so staunchly against the so-called JQing and this so-called Judeo-Bolshevism theory?

Well I'll tell you why.

Obviously, as human beings who have a dissident perspective and want to challenge the establishment and don't believe the lies we're being fed by the mainstream media, as human beings who are appalled by what Israel is doing in Gaza, as human beings who are appalled about how our country has more or less been taken over by this deep state, no longer accountable to us, but serving the interests of a group of people that is clearly not those who comprise the majority.

Red Saffron, what's going on, man?

Thank you so much.

We basically all have the same interests.

Black Pak, what's going on, brother?

I appreciate you so much.

We're not coming from an alien perspective.

We communists, we Bolsheviks, if you will, are standing in the same place as most people, most dissident perspectives.

We are against the establishment.

We are against the people who control this country and are utilizing the resources and wealth of this country, plundering it for the purposes of foreign military adventures to slaughter children abroad.

And not only that, but enslave and immiserate the majority of the population in debt.

We're aware of how Wall Street and the Federal Reserve control this country.

We're aware of all of these things.

We are not the enemy of dissident voices.

The people who are the enemy of dissident voices, though, are the ones trying to spread and disseminate a very peculiar ideology for reasons, as this space probably is going to prove to everyone, that come from a place of bad faith.

Now, they disguise themselves as friends of the people who want to stick it to the elites and to the establishment.

They pretend like they have some kind of solidarity with the Palestinian people and are against Zionism.

But make no mistake, these bad faith actors are neo-Nazis, the same kinds of neo-Nazis that are now operating in Ukraine, by the way, with US taxpayer support in dollars.

Who are trying to wage a war of extermination against the Russian-speaking population there?

Make no mistake, these bad faith actors are part of an international network, highly organized and methodical in their aims and their intentions.

And the sole purpose of it is to psy up you and blind you by corralling you into a failed ideology, which ultimately will serve the interests of that same deep state and those same elites they have you whipped up in a frenzy thinking you're targeting.

The truth is, you're not targeting the actual elites when you are maligning and whipping up a frenzy of hatred against Jews.

Especially not when it comes to historical facts like surrounding the Bolshevik Revolution.

The main reason I think the air has to be cleared on this specific topic and why it is of such directly decisive importance is the following fact: Red Saffron, thank you so much, brother.

I appreciate you.

It really comes down to the simple following fact.

The Nazis failed.

The whole project of so-called National Socialism and Fascism ended with Hitler killing himself in a bunker, with his city being overran by Soviet troops.

Keep in mind, Hitler is the one who declared a war of aggression on the Soviet Union to eradicate Bolshevism from the face of the earth.

Why is Bolshevism such a dirty word?

Why is communism such a dirty word?

The answer is very simple.

The Bolsheviks were the first people in the history of the modern West to actually mount a successful working class revolution against the same elites that Nazis are trying to convince you they're fighting against with you as well.

These elites include Jews, but they're not exclusive to Jews.

It's one of the things they want you to believe is that it's just Jews.

If it's just Jews, then instead of attacking Bill Gates, instead of attacking the Klaus Schwabs, instead of attacking all the non-Jewish capitalist elites, you'll end up attacking your Jewish neighbors and the guy who runs a bagel shop, people who are totally innocent, normal human beings that have nothing to do with the elite agenda.

The truth is that the Bolsheviks are separated from the Nazis.

Thank you so much, Kras.

I appreciate you so much.

One of the major things that separate the Bolsheviks from the Nazis, in addition to the fact that the Bolsheviks could be characterized by their high view of man, by their principles of honor and integrity and selfless devotion to serving the cause not only of the working class but of the people and yes, the Russian people, their own people.

The thing that separated from the Bolsheviks from the Nazis isn't just that they actually.

Successfully

developed and made life better for their people in the long run, not just off of Wall Street speculative capital in hopes of waging a war of aggression, which ultimately actually failed, but superindustrializing not just Russia but countless nations from scratch.

All without any direct foreign investment or foreign capital whatsoever from the West or from the British Empire.

And yes, the cabal of international bankers centered in Wall Street in the city of London.

When you hear the word cabal of international bankers, both the capitalist class and neo-Nazis have psyoped you into thinking Jew, thinking this is somehow Jews.

But I have to inform you, the majority of these people who make up this cabal are not Jews.

Sure, there's Jews that are there, but they're not the majority.

So why are we laser focused on Jews exclusively?

Well, I'll tell you why.

Because it distracts you.

Because it has you recalling and remembering history in ways that are ultimately going to lead dissidents to constantly fail.

Fail in mounting any successful challenge to the establishment whatsoever.

Something the Bolsheviks alone did.

Sure, the Nazis seized power, but they only did so at the beneficence of the German bankers and capitalist elites.

They only did so at the beneficence.

Of the same forces of international capital, which you claim to be fighting.

In other words, it's kind of what a lot of right-wingers on X are trying to do by getting Elon Musk's support, basically kissing his ass, excuse my friends, I'm trying to swear less often, in hopes that they're going to be promoted to a position of power.

Well, that's not how the Bolsheviks seized power.

How the Bolsheviks seized power was by building power among the working class, among the Russian peasants.

The slogan of the October Revolution was all power to the Soviets.

Do you know what the Soviets were?

They were like town halls organically formed by the Russian people to govern themselves.

And the Bolsheviks' rallying cry was to raise these organs of organic popular power to the status of supreme dictatorship.

They didn't rely on the support of any elite capitalist beneficiaries.

They didn't rely on the support of anyone in the establishment.

They, for the first time in history, seized power solely on the basis of their support among the people.

And they did so successfully.

So there's a big reason why they're trying to convince us and why they're trying to convince the public that the Bolsheviks are somehow part of an elite conspiracy.

It couldn't be further from the truth.

The first thing the Bolsheviks did when they seized power was cancel and eliminate all sovereign debt.

Not a lot of people tell you this, but the Tsar's Russia was enslaved to French banks and therefore enslaved to international networks of finance capital.

The Bolsheviks overnight canceled all of these debts.

Listen, every single country on earth invaded Russia after the Bolsheviks took power.

Why did they do that?

Why did the international ruling class send the militaries and armies of every single major power on earth, both the Allies and the Axis, to invade Russia as soon as the Bolsheviks took power?

Ask the question why they demonized the Bolsheviks and why posts going viral on X demonizing the Bolsheviks are gaining so much traction.

And the picture becomes increasingly clear.

Because the Bolsheviks were successful revolutionaries.

They were people who challenged those in power and scared them to their core even to this day, inflicting a trauma upon them that even to this day they haven't recovered from.

Which country on earth right now is doing the most to challenge the global American empire and therefore the international cabal of bankers?

China, for starters.

Who else?

Russia?

What do Russia and China have in common?

I'll tell you what they have in common, the Bolshevik legacy.

It's the legacy of the Bolsheviks that allowed countries like China and like Russia to build sovereign power.

Why is Russia sovereign today, even though the Soviet Union is no longer around?

Because the Bolsheviks established the first political precedent in mankind that was based in a form of politics.

Modern history at least, in the history of mankind's modern existence, at least.

A form of political independence that was tied to economic independence as well.

Many countries think that they're sovereign because they have a formally sovereign government.

Well, if you don't control your own national resources, your own natural resources, if you don't control your own national industries, if you don't control the economic base, how can you be sovereign?

You can't be.

It was the Bolsheviks who tied economic sovereignty to political sovereignty for the first time in modern history.

And that legacy is why countries like Russia and China can today challenge

The global American empire and the financial capitalist class, the same people that are behind the genocide that's going on in Gaza.

Now, to address this matter of Jewish Bolshevism once and for all, and finally, and Mr.

Brandon is here, so we're going to bring him up to speak.

In no way could the Bolshevik Party or the Bolshevik movement be characterized as a Jewish movement.

Only 6% of its membership constituted Jews, which is saying something.

Because in order to be a member of the Bolshevik Party, keep in mind a member and a supporter were completely different things.

That was reserved for elite, educated people.

The Bolsheviks would give tests that were very hard for the average person to pass to be a member of the party.

Now anyone could be a supporter of the Bolsheviks, but to actually be a member of that party was not for everyone.

It was an exclusive club for the most advanced and the most educated segments of the Socialist and Communist movement in Russia.

To give you an idea, the literacy rates of Jews in the Russian Empire just the literacy rates let's forget about secondary education for a moment just literacy rates dwarfed almost every other ethnicity.

And they were only six percent of the membership of the Bolshevik party.

How could that be a Jewish movement?

It doesn't make any sense.

Now it's true that there were some prominent Jews among the Bolsheviks.

Uh Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov, just to name a few.

But this more or less handful of prominent Jewish personalities are not enigmas or mysteries.

Their motivations are very clear.

You could read their diaries, they're publicly available online.

The factors that compelled them and motivated them to become Bolsheviks are transparent.

Sure, the Bolsheviks allowed Jews to become members.

Why wouldn't they?

If I formed a Communist Party in the United States, I would allow Jews to become members.

The Communist Party is open to everyone who's willing to selflessly devote their life to the cause of the working class.

And yes, that included some Jews.

What's wrong with that?

If you think it somehow is incriminating that communist movements in general had Jews, I'd hate to tell you who made up the ranks of the early Christians.

Wasn't Aryans, I'll give you a hint.

It was Jews.

The first Christians were Jews.

And we didn't even see the same sk same exact scale in the socialist movement or the communist movement for that matter, but here's the plain truth.

As far as disproportionate representation among the socialist movement in Europe and Russia at the time, the Bolsheviks were among the least representative of Jews, if not the least.

The Bolsheviks, in contrast to the Mensheviks and other socialist parties at the time, had way less Jews.

They weren't seen as a Jewish movement whatsoever.

And there was also the Bundists as well.

We could talk about how, among the Jews, the Bolsheviks were simply their popularity was basically non-existent.

We could see this from the votes that occurred.

for the Constituent Assembly elections of nineteen seventeen, almost no Jews cast their ballots for the Bolsheviks.

Even the proletarian Jews, the Jews of the working class, who the only Jews that supported the Bolsheviks, by the way, were them.

Most of them went with the Bundes.

Now, people are trying to establish some kind of connection between Nazism.

And Bolshevism.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I'll tell you directly what the Bolsheviks were saying at the time.

The Bolsheviks were telling the Jewish workers that they are part of the Russian people, they're part of Russian civilization.

They need to join with the Russian workers.

They need to join with the workers of the Russian Empire hand in hand as a united working class to fight the capitalist elites.

They were pitting Jewish worker against Jewish capitalists.

What's wrong with that?

The Zionists were trying to recruit these Jews, by the way, and say, no, you'll never be accepted in Russia.

Go to Palestine.

Go take over Palestine.

And what did the Bolsheviks say?

They said that Zionism was a reactionary and bourgeois nationalist movement, which during the Civil War, they fought not only in spirit, not only polemically, but violently.

The Bolshevik Cheka.

Led by the non-Jew, by the way, Felix Zerzhinsky, jailed and shot Zionists.

Prominent Zionists funded and bankrolled the Russian White Army, the counter-revolutionary army.

The British Empire, which was behind the Balfour Declaration, actually sent troops to invade Russia to topple the Bolshevik government.

The idea that there's some kind of connection between Bolshevism and Zionism is a cynical lie.

You know what there was a connection between, though?

The Nazis and the Zionists.

Look up the Havara agreement, where the Nazis agreed, because of their hatred of Jews, because of their anti-Semitism, to transfer millions of Jews to Palestine as a way of evacuating them from Europe.

You don't even have to look at the Nazis, though, because straight from the horse's mouth, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, said directly that the greatest allies of the Zionist movement will be the anti-Semites.

Not the Bolsheviks who are telling the Jews that they shouldn't be going to Palestine, that they should stay in Russia and fight side by side with the working class of the Christian faith and the Muslim faith and of the Russian ethnicity and of all the other ethnicities in the Russian Empire.

The Bolsheviks didn't exclude non-ethnic Russians from their ranks.

Obviously, we know that.

Stalin was a Georgian, by the way.

Khrushchev was a Ukrainian.

Many of the leaders of the Soviet Union would be Ukrainians following Stalin's death.

There was nothing exclusively Russian about it, but at the time it was clear to everyone that by and large the Bolshevik movement was a movement of the great Russian working class majority.

It was in the name the Bolsheviks.

Do you know what Bolshevik means?

It comes from the root word Bolshoi, which in Russian means great or majority or big.

That's what Bolshevik means.

There was no exclusive Jewish minority taking power and killing Christians.

The majority of the soldiers of the Red Army were Christian peasants who actually kept and retained their faith.

During World War II, when they fought the Nazis, the majority of the soldiers of the Red Army likewise were of the Christian faith.

And it's even said by some in the Orthodox Church that Stalin, in private at least, was himself a believer, was himself an Orthodox Christian.

So the notion that Bolshevism is somehow connected to Zionism and is somehow a Jewish supremacist movement that wanted to attack and kill Russian Christians, it's nonsense.

The majority of Bolsheviks came from Christian backgrounds themselves.

And actually, Christianity as a religion formed the unconscious basis of the Bolsheviks' own motivations.

I implore you to read about the psychology of Bolsheviks.

Read about their motivations.

Read about the thing that was driving them to devote their lives to this cause.

It was all in line with Christian values.

There's a reason why President Putin said himself.

For example, that the Code of Communist Builders, which was published in the Soviet Union in the post-war period as a guide of

As a guide for communism, a moral guide.

He said the same values are in the Bible, the exact same values.

This notion, somehow.

That the Bolsheviks have anything to do with Israel's atrocities in Gaza is even more insulting.

When you realize that it was the Bolshevik party that inspired some of the first forms of resistance to the state of Israel, in the form of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, in the form of the various Communist parties in the Middle East, connected to Moscow, connected to the Kremlin, which violently resisted Zionism, which pledged their solidarity with the Arab cause.

I am hard pressed to understand where this notion that the Bolsheviks were somehow Jewish comes from.

The fact that there were a few Jews in the Bolshevik party and in the early stages within the Bolshevik leadership isn't all that meaningful to me.

I don't understand.

Why aren't you pointing out the disproportionate Latvian presence that was there before Brest-Litvosk?

Why aren't you pointing out the sizable Georgian presence?

Stalin, for example, Beria, for example, all Georgians.

Why aren't you pointing out the disproportionate Ukrainian presence?

Why is the Jewish presence, which wasn't even big for

The period after the 1920s, by the way.

Why is that so striking to people to the point where they're saying the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement?

Well, I'll tell you exactly why.

Because this is done not in good faith, not from the perspective of people just speaking their mind and speaking their opinion, but a methodical attempt, a cunning and methodical conspiracy, yes, by neo-Nazis to spread and proliferate this failed ideology of neo-Nazism.

Because the origin of this claim is in the Nazis.

Look up the history.

It was the Nazis who claimed that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement.

Why did they do that?

Because the communist movement in Germany was huge.

And one of the ways they could discredit communism was by saying it was Jewish.

Why did they want to discredit communism?

It's very simple.

Because the German workers wanted to seize power from, yes, an international cabal of bankers and capitalists, which ruled over Germany and who actually appointed Adolf Hitler to his position of power so that he would invade and destroy the Soviet Union on their behalf.

It was always the Soviet Union which was the enemy.

It's the legacy of the Bolshevik movement that built the Soviet Union.

It's the legacy of the Bolshevik movement that built modern China.

Most of the people in the Third World, including in Palestine, that are now fighting against the Zionists, their parents were educated in Moscow.

The Bolshevik legacy is the foundation of all forms of anti-Western struggle and struggle against the Western hegemony.

It all owes a debt to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 from India to Africa.

The Bolshevik legacy and presence there is indisputable, and I can prove it to you straight from the horse's mouth.

It was the Nazis themselves.

who attacked Bolshevism.

Precisely on the grounds that Bolsheviks were empowering Africans, Asians, Arabs, Indians, Latin Americans to rise up against the so-called white race.

Where do you think the theory of Aryanism came from, the superiority of the Aryan race?

Because during Hitler's time, 90% of the world was enslaved to a few countries in the West, to Britain, to Germany, to France.

PJ, thank you so much.

And when I say enslaved, I mean enslaved, literally enslaved, like how the U.S.

went, occupied, and took over Haiti and actually enslaved its population.

The British did whatever they wanted in Egypt and in India.

They were the masters.

The Egyptians, the Indians, they were the slaves.

Is that a dignified existence?

So the Bolsheviks were here telling all of these people to rise up and overthrow the yoke of the foreign imperialists and colonialists.

And lo and behold, here comes Hitler claiming it's a Jewish plot.

It's not a Jewish plot.

The Zriel Zionist plot was enforcing Western colonialism in the Middle East by establishing a permanent foothold.

Of Western hegemony there in the form of the State of Israel.

Make no mistake, the patterns of colonial barbarism.

And depravity in Gaza mirror exactly the same methods used by apartheid South Africa and the Nazis themselves in their bloodthirsty march across Eastern Europe.

When they torched and massacred the citizens and people of Belarus, was that a fight against the Jews?

What did the Belarusian people do to deserve the wrath of the Nazis?

Why were the Slavs called subhuman untermensch?

that the Nazis thought they could do anything to and it not be immoral and it be justified.

Make no mistake, the Nazis that are trying to hijack

The anti-Zionist cause share far more in common with the Zionists than the Bolsheviks they're trying to prevent you from reading up on and learning about.

The Bolsheviks are guilty only for establishing the most advanced modern organization to represent the working class.

Yes, a revolutionary organization.

One that could actually successfully challenge the powers that be, and it did so successfully.

Ask yourself the question: why it's going viral on Elon Musk's esques that the Bolshevik party.

somehow should be maligned and accused of being a bloodthirsty Jewish movement that wanted to kill millions of Christians.

This is nothing more than American Cold War propaganda against the Soviet Union.

The same lies that these Nazis are spreading about the Bolsheviks are the same ones the Zionists were spreading during the Cold War.

Get your priorities straight.

Wake up.

The same fight that the people of Gaza are fighting now was the same fight the Belarusian partisans and the Soviet partisans were fighting against the Nazis.

It's the same fight the Bolsheviks were fighting when they were trying to expel the foreign occupation and foreign presence on Russian soil.

Make no mistake.

Cantrezi, thank you so much, brother.

Make no mistake about it.

Every single major Western power on earth invaded Russian soil to take over Russia's land and resources and minerals and wealth and hand it over to the international capitalist class.

And it was the Bolsheviks who stood in the way of that agenda and defended the sovereignty of Russia, the Russian people and its wealth.

Compare that to the maniac, and yes, he was, it's a matter of fact, homosexual Adolf Hitler.

Adolf Hitler sold out Germany to the international class.

He used the German people as cannon fodder and a ritualistic blood sacrifice to basically attack and do as much damage as they could to the Soviet Union.

And the end result of it was the Nazis looted all of the gold of Eastern Europe.

transferred it to the offshore banks of the British Empire they themselves were deposed Germany became divided, with the western portion

Being completely controlled by the international capitalist class directly, the eastern portion.

Acquiring the minimum of human dignity and preserving Germany's national traditions, and the rest is history.

Now, Germany today is part of NATO and might have to get caught up in World War III over Ukraine.

Is that in the interest of the German people?

Well, thank Adolf Hitler for getting the German people in the situation they're in now.

Had the Communists taken power in the 1930s and thwarted the agenda of Adolf Hitler, Germany wouldn't be in NATO today.

Possibly the Soviet Union would still exist.

Israel wouldn't exist in Palestine either, by the way, because the Palestinians would have so much support from their brethren and from their allies, who expressed nothing but solidarity with them historically.

In contrast to the West, by the way, they would probably have waged the Arab cause probably would have been victorious.

They probably would have expelled the Zionists from their land.

Without the Havara agreement having happened under Adolf Hitler, there possibly wouldn't have ever been a state of Israel to begin with.

So let's be clear.

The past matters.

Setting the record straight matters.

The Nazis were losers.

The Bolsheviks were winners.

There's a reason they want you demonizing the Bolsheviks and having nothing but negative thoughts about the Bolsheviks while having sympathy with the Nazis.

It's nothing but a trap.

The Nazis, when they were prominent, when they were a real powerful movement, when they were in power in Germany, were only there insofar as they were a tool of the international capitalist class.

All the evidence supports this.

And they fumbled immediately, by the way.

The whole ideology was based on the supremacy of the Aryan race and the abil ability of Germany to win wars, and it lost the war.

So that should have buried it forever.

Why are they having people cling to these failed ideologies and these failed movements?

Sure, the Soviet Union no longer exists.

That's not the Bolsheviks' fault.

Soviet Union existed for seventy years.

Until after Stalin died,

It was going only uphill even after Stalin died.

What happened is that the post Stalinist generation of rulers in the Soviet Union fumbled the bag.

That's not the Bolsheviks' fault.

That's the fault of the revisionist bureaucratic clique.

Which took advantage of Stalin's mercy, actually.

They claim the Bolsheviks are so bloodthirsty.

No, they're not.

And I can prove it to you.

Khrushchev still had his head after Stalin died.

If Stalin was truly a bloodthirsty murderer, he would have, and potentially should have, killed far more people.

Instead, he allowed this clearly antagonistic element right under his nose, which he knew about by the way, this liberal class of bureaucrats, to continue living and existing, they eventually take power and destroy the gains of the Russian people, leading to probably one of the biggest calamities of the twentieth century, if not the modern age as a whole, which was the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

In any case, I think it's time we bring up challengers who want to defend because here's the curious thing, and this is why I know these are bad faith actors.

I see posts get millions of views with ten thousand likes, accusing the Bolsheviks of being a Jewish movement, spreading lies and slander, repeating American Cold War propaganda, deep state propaganda.

against the legacy of communism.

And as soon as I challenge them to just defend these claims with a minimum of scrutiny, they block me, they flee, they run away, they avoid confrontation.

Why is that?

If these are good faith actors, if these are people acting with some sincerity.

Why won't they defend the claims that they're making?

You see these posts all the time on X accusing Lenin of being by the way, Lennon wasn't a Jew at all.

The claim that Alexander Blank was a Jew is a forgery.

Lenin's grandfather wasn't Jewish.

There were two Alexander blanks.

One was Jewish, but the time doesn't match up with Lenin's actual family history.

Lenin's actual grandparents

had no Jewish ancestry whatsoever, but German ancestry.

So that's another thing we can litigate if anyone wants to, but it really doesn't matter anyway.

Because the idea that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement is just a lie.

Plain and simple.

Sure, there were many Jews in the socialist movement of the twentieth century and late nineteenth century.

Why shouldn't there be, by the way?

Parties that are forming which require educated people and which are simultaneously telling the Jews, hey, you can be part of this movement and we're not going to exclude you or discriminate against you, but we see you as equals, why wouldn't that be appealing to them?

There's a reason so many other minorities joined the Bolsheviks as well, because it was one of the only political, strong political formations, at least, that really was welcome to all of the Russian people, not just people of the Russian ethnicity, but all of the people part of Russian civilization.

In any case, I want a single right-winger to come and basically make their case.

I mean, I see it so often said that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement.

How could that be if only 6% of the Bolshevik party was Jewish?

I'm confused.

Can anyone clear this up for me?

I'm aware there were some Jews.

In the Bolshevik leadership, but they were never a majority.

There was also some Georgians, there was also some Latvians, there was also some Poles.

I also see all these infographics which are just lies.

I have to explain something to right-wing illiterates.

If you just put a David star in front of someone's face, it doesn't mean they're Jewish.

You actually have to back that up with some kind of source.

The claim that Stalin is Jewish is ridiculous.

The claim that Felix Dzerzhinsky is Jewish is ridiculous.

You putting a Jewish star over their pictures is just cynical.

It's a cynical form of lying, to be honest.

And my theory is actually the majority of these neo-Nazis.

Are actually nihilists who don't even believe in the things that they're saying.

If you watch the documentary, Europa the Last Battle, even its creators admit that 70% of the factual claims they make are made-up lies.

That's what the creators say.

I think it's more than 70%, by the way.

But cynically, they just lie and make things up and hope that uneducated and illiterate people will just believe it.

And this is what's so important about the Bolshevik movement.

In contrast to the Nazi movement and other movements, it encouraged education most of all.

The most important thing was education.

To be a Bolshevik, you had to be well read, not just on Marxist literature, but on what Lenin said the whole treasure and wealth of mankind, you had to be exposed to it.

You had to read books, you had to know about poetry, you had to know about art, you had to know about history, you had to know about these things, you had to enrich and fill your mind with a minimum acquaintance of facts, yes, scientific facts as well.

The reason there's so many conspiracy theories about the Bolsheviks is because they were a movement of people.

Who promoted education.

So there's a barrier to entry there.

Not any idiot could join the Bolshevik Party and for good reason.

Look at how many idiots there are on X who buy into Europa the last battle.

How many of you actually attempted to check the veracity of the claims that it's making on a factual level?

Probably none of you.

Well, you should.

You should have critical thinking.

You should read books.

You should educate yourself.

If there's going to be any kind of revolutionary movement that challenges the Zionists in power, that challenges the hegemony, that and challenges the status quo, it has to be made up and led by people who read books, who are educated, who think critically, who don't just believe anything they see on the internet.

What's wrong with that?

I mean the Nazi rank and file was just full of a bunch of idiots.

The party membership.

Hitler was an idiot.

Hitler didn't read anything.

Hitler made all these claims about Marxism.

He never read a single book by Karl Marx in his entire life.

The other Nazi party members were even more illiterate.

Hitler himself was shocked by what happened in the Soviet Union in the late 30s.

He said, Where did all the Jews go?

Stalin purged all of them.

He didn't realize that the only reason there were so many prominent Jews in the first place was just because there was an education disparity.

It wasn't because Stalin hated Jews.

Once the Russians, the non-Jewish Russians, became more educated under Stalin, they replaced and pretty much accounted for all of the disproportionate ethnic overrepresentation that was previously there.

Because finally, you had a population of people who actually read books and could read and write.

and had secondary education.

That were there and there there was no longer such a huge Jewish overrepresentation, if any up overrepresentation at all.

But I I I I'm curious because I hear nothing but crickets from these same people spreading these lies and I'd like some pushback.

I'd like someone to come and just defend the claim that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement.

Can anyone defend this claim?

A single person?

Is there a single person capable of coming up here and defending this claim?

Is there anyone, literally anyone?

I know that, um.

Let's go, Brando45.

I don't know what he's saying to Cope, but I encourage my followers to go and inform him about the space that's happening right now.

Because maybe he's just not informed.

He was here before, maybe he disconnected due to a technical uh a technical uh difficulty.

Anyway, bring bring him here.

Bring him here.

I mean, if not him, will anyone else defend the claim?

Why is this?

How can a post get 10,000 likes?

Surely, one of the people who liked that post will come here and defend it.

But it's crickets.

Why are they so scared of me?

By the way, let's go Brando.

He agreed to debate me.

He said, the leader of your movement, I'll debate him.

Now he claims he's only going to debate Jackson because Jackson has more followers.

The movement that is challenging Brandon is the one I lead.

Anyway, he's making excuses, and it's honestly nothing new.

It's just kind of one of those things.

It's just kind of like Jay Dyer all over again.

But it's okay because I only have about fifteen more minutes and then I'm going to be going on R T live to do actual news.

Which I have scheduled at 9, but it would be a real big shame if not a single person steps up to the challenge at all.

Between now and then.

I mean will literally no one do it?

I need everyone to understand there's a clear pattern going on.

I challenge Keith Woods to debate me.

He says no.

He wants to debate Jackson.

I challenged Jay Dyer to debate me.

He says no.

He finally agrees after getting bullied.

And then he just kind of interrupts every every sentence.

He wouldn't wouldn't let me get a sentence in, and then he kicks me after two minutes.

Um Orthodox canonist won't debate me.

Only Jackson.

I kind of have a feeling that there's something about me in particular that really terrifies people when it comes to.

Debate.

I don't know why I'm so terrifying to them.

And if I'm so terrifying to you, by the way, you could just start telling the truth.

If you're scared that if you debate me and I'm going to expose you as a fraud and a liar, why don't you just start telling the truth?

Why don't you stop lying?

Why don't you stop spreading and telling lies?

Because you're a bad faith actor.

You know you're lying.

If you didn't know you were lying, you wouldn't be so afraid to debate me.

You would be confident in the things you're saying and actually keep that same energy when actually.

In the same voice call as me, or in the same Twitter space as me, you'd keep the same exact energy.

Why don't they do that?

Keep the same energy as when you make your post.

If you don't if you're not willing to keep the same energy, then tell your followers that you're lying to them.

Do the decent thing and admit you're a liar.

I'm not a big scary monster.

I'm just somebody who's forcing these people to be honest about their real intentions and their real agenda.

Why are you scared of me?

Why are you so terrified of me?

If you're not educated on the subject, that's fine, but you're making claims about the subject.

Why won't you back up those claims?

Uh I mean, let's see, has he responded at all in any capacity?

I'm gonna have RTSG as co-host because I wanna see if there's someone requesting to speak that I cannot see.

Potentially

Is anyone requesting that you can see or what's going on?

Um I can only see one person accepting but it doesn't seem like a wig nat or anything like that.

Who is it?

Um it's at Musa underscore Mohammed thirty two.

Well, br bring him on anyway because uh

We'll just give anyone a chance.

We won't we won't we're not we're not referring into wig knots anyone who wants to disagree

Alright, I've given them speaker.

There's also someone else requesting right now.

Alright.

We're getting uh we're getting a bunch of people requesting.

Sure, guys, remember we only have ten more minutes.

Um only request if you actually disagree, guys.

Yeah.

We only have ten more minutes because at nine I have to be on R T.

But let's uh let's see.

Yo, Haz, I'll debate you on that.

I'll play double's advocate.

And sure.

Yeah.

Can you give me a few minutes though, because I want to see what Brazil was arguing and then try to try to use some of the things that I've got.

We don't have a few minutes because I only have 10 minutes.

But I'll tell you what he was saying.

His original post went as follows.

He said more or less.

Uh let me find it.

What he said was

He made the claim that, um

Let me grab it.

Here it is.

The Bolshevik Revolution, also known as the Great October Socialist Revolution, was the first successful Marxist coup.

First thing he said that was a lie was that it was a coup.

Eighty five percent of the Bolshevik leadership was Jewish.

So it's like a black and white thing.

I mean, is he telling the truth or is he lying about that?

They slaughtered millions of Christians.

Again, that's not true.

Co-opt the country culture, subvert it, rule over ashes.

How could they rule over ashes when even Winston Churchill admitted that Stalin came to Russia where they only had wooden plows and left it with nuclear weapons, superindustrialized the country and brought it into the modern age?

I don't understand.

But if you want to defend that, please, by all means.

There's no way to defend it, but there is a way to, you know, pull the devil's advocate on this and just argue it just knowing that's going to get crushed.

Hold on.

If it's only the devil's advocate, I want to see if this guy might be sincerely believe it's real.

Go ahead, Tattoos.

Go ahead.

Yeah, so your argument is that the Jews were against the bourgeoisie, right?

I'm not trying to get into the JQ right now, but.

No, no, my argument was that the Bolsheviks were not a Jewish movement.

Nothing close to 85% of its leadership was Jewish.

I mean, it's a baffling claim.

Okay, so I can't remember what it is.

There was not even a single month.

Because you have to understand the Central Committee, there was a lot of changes going on there month by month in the early years.

The most Jewish representation was four out of seven.

For one month, four out of seven people in the Central Committee were Jewish.

Okay, for one month.

Okay, regardless whether they're Jewish or not, that's not really my argument.

Okay.

Okay, were they against the bourgeoisie?

Every single Jew who cast their support behind the Bolsheviks.

Yes.

Okay, why did they why were they funded by Wall Street?

They weren't.

Not in any case, they were.

Yes, they were.

What's your evidence?

I I posted it and you deleted it.

I what what what what what I I'm streaming on Kitcord yeah I'm streaming on Kitcord right now I have one drawn and one of you guys deleted it

Okay, well uh I I assume you're citing Anthony Sutton?

Yeah, and Robert Spence.

Okay, well, let's just begin with Anthony Sutton because I'm more familiar with his lies that he's been making up.

Even if you the problem with Anthony Sutton is the way he presents the facts, and I'll tell you the actual truth behind everything he said, right?

The truth is, there is one guy from Sweden named Olaf Ashberg, who is a low-level banker who happened to personally, ideologically, have communist views.

Olaf Ashberg barely, barely

Helped the Bolsheviks out a little bit.

But besides him, there is absolutely no evidence for any Wall Street support of the Bolsheviks.

Jacob Schiff, for example, supported the Kerensky provisional government.

And then, as soon as the Bolsheviks took power, immediately supported the Allied invasion.

And actually, Wall Street funded the white army in Russia.

And there's direct evidence for that.

Wall Street also funded the Nazis.

I mean, they funded like every every Wall Street funded the Nazis.

They funded the white counter revolution.

There's no evidence for them funding the Bolsheviks at all.

The Bolsheviks didn't need to.

Yes, Lenin was actually in Wall Street.

Now you're just being a little ridiculous.

Even Sutton himself won't make the claim that Lennon was in Wall Street.

The claim is that Trotsky was in Wall Street.

Not Lenin.

And then even all of the money that Trotsky was able to raise, because I agree, Trotsky was a shady guy.

He wasn't even a Bolshevik, though.

That's the problem.

Trotsky opportunistically jumped on the bandwagon of the revolution at the last moment.

His intentions were snuffed out years after the revolution, and he became the number one enemy of the Soviet government.

But in any case, all of Trotsky's funds were seized.

In Canada, when he tried to return to Russia.

So even then, it's meaningless.

By the way, Ashberg was not even exclusively loyal to the Bolsheviks at all.

He just had communist sympathies.

He tried to get a $50 million loan for the Imperial Russian Ministry of Finance on behalf of the Tsarist government before any kind of support for the Bolsheviks or sympathy with the Bolsheviks.

Um Ashbergs, it's called the Nya Benken that supposedly supported the Bolsheviks, and it could only have constituted a minuscule portion compared to the primary subsidies which they seized from the actual Russian bourgeoisie.

That was the m majority of their revenue and their funding was actually coming from that.

They actually took over the wealth that was controlled by the ruling class in Russia.

And moreover, keep in mind that the so-called support that we're talking about isn't for the revolution.

It's for the aftermath of the revolution when the Bolsheviks were fighting in the Civil War.

That's when Ashberg supposedly was trying to help them out, which he could only do low-key, by the way, because the United States and all of the major powers in Europe committed troops.

to Russia.

So that would be considered treason, actually.

Ah, he disconnected.

Let's bring him back.

So let me let me continue.

Let me continue now that you have speaker.

I also want to say that, look, we could get into the nitty-gritty details about Olaf Ashberg.

Because any revolutionary movement is going to have a few wealthy individuals, a handful, not even a handful, who are sympathetic for ideological reasons, betraying their own class and their own class interests.

But all I need to do is ask you the following question.

Regarding Trotsky, why would everyone be completely loyal to the revolution?

That Solzhenitsyn was part of the revolution and he turned out.

No, he wasn't.

Solzhenitsyn was the solution.

He was.

Yes, he was.

Yes, he was.

Jesus Christ.

Originally, he was part of it.

Almost everyone that was part of the revolution betrayed it.

Because it was Solzhenitsyn's parents.

Why would they be completely loyal to it?

Why?

Why?

This is the problem I have.

I think that people who spread propaganda against the Bolsheviks are actually porn addicts because your impulse control is incredible.

The fact that you can't shut up for two seconds and let me get a sentence in and start screaming that Solzhenitsyn, who was born after the revolution and whose parents were victimized with it, was somehow loyal to the revolution.

I don't understand what that's supposed to mean.

I don't understand.

He was part of the movement.

He was loyal to the movement.

But he was born after the revolution.

Okay, yes, but his parents were against it, where he was loyal to it.

He was born after it happened.

So all that means is that he was raised in Soviet primary school.

That means nothing.

Anyway, the point I'm trying to get at and hammer home here, because I don't have a lot of time now that I have to go and have other obligations.

But I want to ask you the following question because we can get into these nitty-gritty details about Olaf Ashberg, which will lead nowhere.

I promise they won't.

Answer the following question.

As soon as the Bolsheviks take power,

All sovereign debts were liquidated overnight.

Sorry, I didn't hear you.

One of us got disconnected.

If the Bolsheviks were financed by Wall Street, why did they liquidate all sovereign debts overnight that were owed to international banks by the Russian government?

Overnight, all wiped.

I mean, everyone's going to have their own stance.

They're going to work together at one point, then they're going to turn against each other.

So you're saying as soon as they took power, they turned against them as soon as they took power?

Because they wiped the debt as soon as they took power, right when they took power.

Anything?

I guess not.

Nothing?

All right, listen, I can't really hear you.

One of us is disconnecting.

I'm just gonna say that you're just spreading like a bunch of bullshit yourself.

It's like little bullshit.

Okay, why did they wipe this out?

I don't know how dumb you have to be to believe in this bullshit.

But okay, do you have an argument?

You can be yourself, spread whatever lies you want.

I support freedom of speech.

Yeah, but do you have an argument though?

People are going to realize what you're doing.

But don't you think you're kind of acting irrationally by not making an argument while saying this?

Okay, he left.

He disconnected.

Like I said, guys, I don't understand.

I don't understand why people are so committed to something they can't defend rationally uh at all in any capacity.

But he just disconnected and left and then claimed that I'm spreading a bunch of and I quote him, I don't like to swear anymore, but I quote him bullshit.

Um

Why is it bullshit if you can't make a single argument?

I just asked you why did they liquidate all the sovereign debt and you had no response.

By the way, the Nazis didn't liquidate any debt.

They continued making payments to the Bank of International Settlements even during the war.

Do you understand that?

Even during the war.

I G Farben.

On its board of directors, had people from Wall Street, American citizens from Wall Street, on the board of shareholders for IG Farben.

while the US was at war with the Nazis.

All the while the Nazis continued making payments to the International Bank the Bank of International Settlements using gold they stole from Czechoslovakia.

So it's all about debt, actually.

You can make all of these claims about Jews and Wall Street, but follow the money trail.

Follow who's paying the debt and who's liquidating the debt.

The Bolsheviks canceled the debt overnight.

They canceled all of it, wiped it all clean.

The Nazis continued paying the debt from the Treaty of Versailles.

Actually, IG Farben and all these mega-industrial cartels in Germany were created by venture capitalists from Wall Street to basically capitalize off of the Treaty of Versailles debt.

Which itself was being exacted from the British and the French to pay back.

Wall Street and America for its loans during World War One.

So you had this international finance capitalist machine which was propping up the German war machine and German industry just to pay back debt.

It was all going back to debt.

And the Bolsheviks canceled the debt.

Usury is based on debt.

The power of the financial capitalist international cabal of bankers is based on debt.

The Nazis continued paying the debt.

The Bolsheviks wiped the slate clean overnight.

That's really all you have to know about this topic.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is the reason the Bolsheviks are demonized.

That's the reason you're seeing so many viral posts on X demonizing the Bolsheviks.

A grassroots, populist, revolutionary movement, which actually not only successfully overthrew.

The ruling class.

But did so independently only based on the support from the workers and peasants of Russia.

I want to end on a final note, guys.

We are entering a new era.

The alt-right and the neo-Nazis will no longer be allowed to be the vanguard of any dissident movement in the United States.

The future is Bolshevik.

The future is red.

The future generation of dissidents and revolutionaries and anti-establishment thinkers will be Bolsheviks.

Bolshevism is in.

Neo-Nazism is out.

I say that and I make that vow to everyone listening here.

Bolshevism is in.

Nazism is out.

We Bolsheviks are taking control of the operation now.

The alt-right failed miserably.

And will no longer be

possessing any ideological hegemony over the movement of dissidents and anti establishment forces, we make that vow to everyone here to day.

Ladies and gentlemen,

It's been good.

Hopefully, the right wing will stop running from me.

But as you saw today, the one person who had the courage.

To defend this claim, look how irrationally they behaved and acted.

Speaks for itself.

Goodbye, everyone.

What's up, Stalin Beria Gulag?

I appreciate you guys.

I'd like to keep streaming and I will be streaming again Thursday.

We'll be returning to our more or less reg regular schedule.

Uh but I have to um

I'm going to be going on RT, so I'll see you guys.

Bye-bye.

See you later.

Uh