πŸ”΄ RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ

2024-03-19T23:30:19+00:00
Been here before. It's in my muscle memory. I'm pretty sure. I recognize you. There is something in your eyes. I'll let you get away tonight. You leave me in the dark
I'm stumbling around like all my question mark
Wondering if you're around or catch me if I fall
If I come crashing to the wall
Will you
Let me
On the jump start my heart
I need someone
Before the sun goes down
Who's gonna save me now?
Some kind of hero I can't breathe Hoping you're here to rescue me
Before the sun goes down
Who's gonna save me now
some color here
oh I feel like it before it's in my muscle memory I'm pretty sure I felt this energy there's something in you touch so they're
reminding me of us will you make me up jump start my heart I need someone
before the sun goes down
who's gonna save me
now
some kind of hero
I can breathe
hoping you're hitting
to rescue me
before the sun goes down
who's going to set me now
some kind of hero
oh Some kind of hero Some kind of hero Some kind of hero some cruel to hate.
Oh,
uh,
uh, T'a-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-da
Yeah. Been here before.
It's in my muscle memory, I'm pretty sure.
I recognize you there is something in your eyes.
I'll let you get away tonight.
You leave me in the dark you get away tonight you
leave me in the dark
I'm stumbling around
like on the question mark
wondering if you're around
would catch me if I fall
if I'm crush into the wall
will you
let me up
jump start my heart
I need someone
before the sun goes
down
who's gonna to save me now some kind of hero i can't breathe hoping you're here to rescue me before the sun goes down who's gonna save me now some color here I feel It's in my muscle memory
I'm pretty sure i felt this energy there's something in your touch so i'm never
reminded me of us will you let me up jumpstart my heart, I need someone before the sun goes down, who's gonna save me now?
Some kind of hero, I can't breathe
Hoping you here to rescue me
Before the sun goes down
Who's gonna set me now
Some kind of hero
some kind of hero some crowed here and uh...
Tadda
Tadda
Tadda Da-la-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da. I'm here before it's in my muscle memory I'm pretty sure I recognize you there is something in your eyes won't let you get away tonight you leave me in the dark i'm stumbling around like all my
question mark wondering if you're around or catch me if I fall If I can crash into the wall
Will you let me up
Jumpstart my heart
I need someone
Before the sun goes down who's gonna save me down some kind of hero i can breathe hoping you're here to rescue me before the sun goes down who's going to save me now some color here It's been That it before
It's in my muscle memory I'm pretty sure I felt this energy there's something in your touch something in you touch something reminded me of her will you make me jumpstart my heart? I need someone before the sun goes down. Who's going to save me down some kind of hero
I can breathe
hoping you're here to rescue
before the sun goes down
who's going to set me some kind of Who's gonna save me now?
Some kind of hero.
Oh, some crying
oh
uh
do uh
uh
uh I'm I'm
I'm
Tadal la da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da la la
Yeah I This
I'm a big, from the people,
from the people,
downed the Japanese go-chang-to-siao-beer Jiangbegion.
I'm a bit of young people,
I'm a bit,
love or I,
a people,
the war,
and then,
I'm a, take, Connion,
Hey, hey
I want to
My Dece
E! E!
Who can't
start-dong-d-dict
To start
He! To fight him
To get-ta, not love people I'm A few I'm a Aene
Manso
Baii
A white
Japan
Goe
Chang
Toh
Saut
Siam
B
A
I am
people I
I People I
Conn
Conch I I And I I And You, Comming, Comming Conmin'
Concheting
We
Hey,
Hey
I Can
I
Can
What
Can Can Can
Who Can
To
To To
To
stop
To S S Five, six.
I'm a few. I'm a big.
I'm a big.
From a band.
A lot of people,
down,
down, down, down, fayton, I'm a one, The warped the people go-chenged Toh Auxlemylian,
I'm a general-five-o-five-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-olemy-concinct. Hey, hey, hey,
and, hey,
can't get-the-con, and can't
see
Who can start
start combat
and
get
clo,
and
I'm people
and
Man Manx
Man
Man
Man Man Man Man
Thou
Man The warlike the people gochang down, down, stop me
We're just a guise
A.
I'm a big I don't know
I love the people
The war
On the Mani down
My
Mani
Stand
Goe
Can't Can't Can't Can
Can't can't
start
start
start I'm quite
I'm playing battle
battle
he's
I'm
know
I'm
black
black
people people
that
people down
and
I'm a big I'm He's got a run-con-tall, I think the general We're going to
We're a big
Man-I-N-Rewan
People,
Commun-Gent-Cat Co-E
O'N-Gent
Koeh
Hey, hey,
H
Hey,
H
Can't
Look-E
Can't
Can't Who can Fatton To start I can't my eyes can't can't find a tonne,
Who can't fathom,
Stand,
Get a-taught, Without I think about, I shall be going to I'm a
people I'm
people
people
government counter
and
I'm
hey
count
my can't my
can't
can't
who can
who can start turn I can't talkondon-Tzen, Who can't talk-tow-pull-pulled?
I'm a-kampi
I'm a-been
I'm a-been
I'm a-e-e-a-been party you know The people,
People, Gang-Beinged people,
down-bing-de-ren.
Han-tong-Tong-Tong-Bing-the-man,
there's a-hap-weeat. The People There's
There's What's
Because
Because
we're
Because
we're We're people
The
people People People in the country In fact
Thean army
People's
People's
No.
From
from
From
from To
Man, to Vietnam to Vietnam To Vietnam to leave the down down
down
down
so
not
a
a
each
year
and
all is
all is all is all
all
the world
all is
the
and
that
so not
a
it's
it is
a a year It's It's Yeah
A-tong
A-ean
To-te-lake
To-Gu-te-l
To-Gu-T T'
T' N' N' N' The people People is the is not a
tell
the bian
the bian
the
mingue
and
with the
fur
fern
and the
people people
is not not a The Pan-Tang-Bing people The President
New York I don't know I'm going
I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm not
I'm
I'm
I'm not
I'm
and
I'm I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
No and I don't know
I'm
I'm I'm gonna
I'm
the
I'm
a
I'm
I'm The I'm and I'm not
I'm
I'm
I'm The welcome everybody um welcome everybody um if you don't Welcome, everybody.
If you don't know, I'm also streaming this to KIC
where you can see me on video.
It's KIC.com slash infrared.
I also have something of a new setup or at least a new camera placement.
And we have a lot to talk about today.
We first of all have someone who we've arranged a debate with,
whether or not they're going to show up to said debate is,
I suppose it's up in the air as of now, because
like all of my opponents, Mr. Brandon has fled the scene. He decided to back out at the last
minute, claiming that he wants to debate Jackson instead, because Jackson has 2 million followers, which is kind of a common thing I've been hearing from right-wingers who engage in confrontations and who I challenged the debates, but then they claim, no, I want to debate Jackson, knowing that Jackson isn't going to debate them because he's too busy being like an international diplomat, forging connections, and representing the American people on the international stage more generally.
People are truly terrified of me, it seems, and I just don't understand why. I guess I should present like I understand why. I just kind of don't um i don't bite you know
it's over the internet i'm not gonna reach into my camera and slap you across the face i'm a
civilized person and i know i have had inflammatory debates in the past, but as long as you can keep things
respectful, things are not going to escalate to the point where I'm going to yell at you. But I don't
suspect the reason people don't debate me is because of my inflammatory or hostile past
when debating certain opponents.
I think the real reason people don't want
to debate me is simply because
I know what I'm talking about.
Probably one of the most knowledgeable people
in this space, and I'm not saying that to
toot my own horn, because knowledgeable people generally this space, and I'm not saying that to toot my own horn, because
knowledgeable people generally don't become influencers. They kind of stick to the books and bury
themselves in these books, and they don't, they see themselves as above this plebeian popularity contest
that is the internet and the clout game.
But I've managed to do something that not a lot of, let's say, intellectuals have done in the past,
which is unite the two mediums. I'm someone who happens to be extremely well read.
It has, have an extremely advanced grasp as far as American
standards are concerned on theory. And I managed to unite that with running a community online.
It's very intimidating to people because 99% of political influencers are just people who come on the internet and start opening their mouth without knowing what they're talking about.
But in any case, let's just get to the matter at hand that's of direct relevance to all of us.
We've been seeing some viral posts on X concerning the Bolsheviks.
And with a conflict that's going on in Gaza right now, Israel is a self-proclaimed Jewish state. Zionism is an ideology of so-called Jewish nationalism.
Sayab Shorty, thank you so much. Appreciate you. Many people get corralled and find it tempting to kind of boost these posts which demonize jews by
accusing them of being the bolsheviks many people aren't educated about who the bolsheviks were
or their history or the history of the russian revolution and they jump on this bandwagon, so to speak,
many of them because of Israel's atrocities in Gaza, thinking that they're just kind of
sticking it to the Jews. Well, there's two problems with that. In addition to recycling
Nazi propaganda, effectively, more importantly, as far as we're
concerned, you're kind of poking the Bolshevik bee nest, so to speak, because we are the Bolsheviks
in the modern context. We infrared people, we so-called maga communists the bolsheviks are for us
heroes as far as our historical memory is concerned not only are they heroes but i would even go so far as to say they're sacred figures
in our history. And we're not going to allow our history to be trifled with by having people
slander and malign them as somehow having anything to do with Zionism or some international conspiracy, not just because we're against whipping up hatred against Jews, but because we're here to clear and defend the name of the Bolsheviks. Now, the first thing that might be on your mind, and the first thing, I guess, which confuses people as to why that is is why do we find it so
important to defend the bolsheviks why are the bolsheviks so important to us why are we so
staunchly against the so-called j queuing and this so-called Judeo-Bolcivism theory.
Well, I'll tell you why.
Obviously, as human beings who have a dissident perspective and want to challenge the establishment
and don't believe the lies were being fed by the mainstream media.
As human beings who are appalled by what Israel is doing in Gaza,
as human beings who are appalled about how our country has more or less been taken over by this deep state,
no longer accountable to us, but serving the interests of a group of people
that is clearly not those who comprise the majority. Reds, Saffron, what's going on, man? Thank you so much.
We basically all have the same interests. Blackpack, what's going on, brother? I appreciate you so much. We're not coming from an alien perspective. We communists, we Bolsheviks, if you will, are standing in the same place as most people, most dissident perspectives.
We are against the establishment. We are against the people who control this country
and are utilizing the resources and wealth of this country,
plundering it for the purposes of foreign military adventures
to slaughter children abroad and not only that but
enslave and emiserate the majority of the population in debt we're aware of how wall
street and the federal reserve control this country we're aware of all these things we are not the
enemy of dissident voices.
The people who are the enemy of dissident voices, though, are the ones trying to spread and
disseminate a very peculiar ideology for reasons, as this space probably is going to prove to everyone that come from a place of
bad faith now they disguise themselves as friends of the people who want to stick it to the elites
and to the establishment they would pretend like they have some kind of solidarity with the Palestinian people and are
against Zionism.
But make no mistake, these bad faith actors are neo-Nazis, the same kinds of neo-Nazis that are now
operating in Ukraine, by the way, with U.S. taxpayer support in dollars, who are trying to wage a war of extermination against the Russian-speaking population there. Make no mistake, these bad faith actors are part of an international network, highly organized
and methodical in their aims and their intentions, and the sole purpose of it is to sigh up
you and blind you by corraling you into a failed ideology which ultimately will serve the interests of that same deep state and those same elites, they have you whipped up in a frenzy thinking you're targeting.
The truth is you're not targeting the actual elites when you are maligning and whipping
up a frenzy of hatred against Jews, especially not when it comes to historical facts like surrounding
the Bolshevik revolution
the main reason i think the air has to be cleared on this specific topic
and why it is of such directly decisive importance
is the following fact
red saffron thank you so much, brother. I appreciate you. It really comes down to the simple
following fact. The Nazis failed. The whole project of so-called national socialism and
fascism ended with Hitler killing himself in a bunker,
with his city being overran by Soviet troops.
Keep in mind, Hitler is the one who declared a war of aggression
on the Soviet Union to eradicate Bolshevism from the face of the earth.
Why is Bolshevism such a dirty word? Why is communism such a dirty word?
The answer is very simple. The Bolsheviks were the first people in the history of the modern West
to actually mount a successful working class revolution
against the same elites that Nazis are trying to convince you, they're fighting against with you as well.
These elites include Jews, but they're not exclusive to Jews. It's one of the things they
want you to believe is that it's just Jews. If it's just Jews, then instead of attacking Bill Gates,
instead of attacking the Klaus Schwabs, instead of attacking all the non-Jewish capitalist elites, you'll end up attacking your
Jewish neighbors and the guy who runs a bagel shop, people who are totally innocent, normal human
beings that have nothing to do with the elite agenda. The truth is that the Bolsheviks
are separated from the Nazis.
Thank you so much, Krasz.
I appreciate you so much.
One of the major things
that separate the Bolsheviks from the Nazis,
in addition to the fact
that the Bolsheviks could be characterized by their high view of man,
by their principles of honor and integrity, and selfless devotion, to serving the cause not only of the
working class, but of the people, and yes, the Russian people, their own people.
The thing that's separated from the Bolsheviks from the Nazis isn't just that they actually
successfully developed and made life better for their people in the long run, not just off of Wall Street speculative capital in hopes of waging a war of aggression, which ultimately actually failed, but super industrializing, not just Russia, but countless nations from scratch, all without any direct foreign investment or foreign capital whatsoever, from the West or from the British Empire.
And yes, the cabal of international bankers centered in Wall Street in the city of London.
When you hear the word cabal of international bankers,
both the capitalist class and neo-Nazis have
siopped you into thinking thinking Jew, thinking this is somehow
Jews, but I have to inform you the majority of this people who make up this cabal are not Jews.
Sure, there's Jews that are there, but they're not the majority. So why are we laser-focused on Jews exclusively?
Well, I'll tell you why.
Because it distracts you, because it has you recalling and remembering history in ways
that are ultimately going to lead dissidents to constantly fail fail in mounting any successful challenge to the establishment whatsoever something the bolsheviks alone did sure the nazis seized power but they only did so at the beneficence of the German bankers
and capitalist elites.
They only did so at the beneficence
of the same
forces of international capital
which you claim to be fighting.
In other words, it's kind of what a lot of right-wingers
on X are trying to do by getting Elon Musk's support, basically kissing his ass, excuse my
friends, I'm trying to swear less often, in hopes that they're going to be promoted to a position of power well that's not how
the bolsheviks seized power how the bolsheviks seized power was by building power among the
working class among the russian peasants the slogan of the october revolution was all power to the Soviets. Do you know what the Soviets were? They were like town halls, organically formed by the Russian people, to govern themselves. And the Bolsheviks rally in cry was to raise these organs of organic, popular power to the status of supreme dictatorship.
They didn't rely on the support of any elite capitalist beneficiaries.
They didn't rely on the support of anyone in the establishment. They, for the first time in history, seized power solely on the basis of their support among the people. And they did so successfully. So there's a big reason why they're trying to convince us and why they're
trying to convince the public that the Bolsheviks are somehow part of an elite conspiracy.
It couldn't be further from the truth. The first thing the Bolsheviks did when they seized
power was cancel and eliminate all sovereign debt.
Not a lot of people tell you this, but the Tsar's Russia was enslaved to French banks and therefore enslaved to international networks of finance capital. The Bolsheviks
overnight canceled all of these debts. Listen, every single country on earth invaded Russia after the
Bolsheviks took power. Why did they do that? Why did the international ruling
class send the militaries and armies of every single major power on earth, both the
allies and the Axis, to invade Russia as soon as the Bolsheviks took power.
Ask the question why they demonized the Bolsheviks and why posts going viral on X demonizing the Bolsheviks are gaining so much traction, and the picture becomes increasingly clear, because the Bolsheviks were successful revolutionaries.
They were people who challenged those in power and scared them to their core even to this day,
inflicting a trauma upon them that even to this day they haven't recovered from which country on earth right now
is doing the most to challenge the global american empire and therefore the international cabal of bankers
china for starters who else r Russia? What do Russia and China have in common?
I'll tell you what they have in common. The Bolshevik legacy. It's the legacy of the Bolsheviks
that allowed countries like China and like Russia to build sovereign power.
Why is Russia sovereign today, even though the Soviet Union is no longer around?
Because the Bolsheviks established the first political precedent in mankind that was based in a form of politics, modern history at least,
in the history of mankind's modern existence, at least, a form of political independence that
was tied to economic independence as well. Many countries think that they're sovereign because they have a formally sovereign government. Well, if you don't control your own national resources, your own natural resources, if you don't control your own national industries if you don't control
the economic base how can you be sovereign you can't be it was the bolsheviks who tied economic
sovereignty to political sovereignty for the first time in modern history and And that legacy is why countries like Russia and China can today challenge the global
American empire and the financial capitalist class, the same people that are behind the genocide
that's going on in Gaza.
Now, to address this matter of Jewish Bolivism once and for all, and finally,
and Mr. Brandon is here, so we're going to bring him up to speak,
in no way
could the Bolshevik Party or the Bolshevik
movement be characterized as a
Jewish movement. Only 6%
of its membership
constituted Jews,
which is saying something. Because in order to
be a member of the Bolshevik party, keep in mind, a member and a supporter were completely different things, that was reserved for elite, educated people. The Bolsheviks would give tests that were very hard for the average person to pass to be a member
of the party. Now anyone could be a
supporter of the Bolsheviks, but to actually be
a member of that party was not
for everyone. It was an exclusive club for the
most advanced and the most educated
segments of the
socialist and communist movement in Russiaussia to give you an idea the
literacy rates of jews in the russian empire just the literacy rates let's forget about
secondary education for a moment just literacy, dwarfed almost every other ethnicity.
And they were only 6% of the membership of the Bolshevik Party.
How could that be a Jewish movement?
It doesn't make any sense.
Now, it's true that there were some prominent Jews among the Bolsheviks.
Kamenev, Zenoviev, Svardlov, just to name a few.
But this more or less handful of prominent Jewish personalities are not enigmas or
mysteries. Their motivations
are very clear. You could read their diaries.
They're publicly available online.
The factors that compelled them and
motivated them to become Bolsheviks
are transparent. Sure, the
Bolsheviks allowed Jews to become members. Why wouldn't they? If I formed a Communist Party in the United States, I would allow Jews to become members. The Communist Party is open to everyone who's willing to selflessly devote their life to the cause of the working class.
And yes, that included some Jews. What's wrong with that?
If you think it somehow is incriminating that communist movements in general had Jews,
I'd hate to tell you who made up the ranks of the early Christians.
Wasn't Aryans.
I'll give you a hint.
It was Jews.
The first Christians were Jews.
And we didn't even see the same exact scale in the socialist movement, or the communist movement, for that matter.
But here's the plain truth.
As far as disproportionate representation among the socialist movement in Europe and Russia at the time, the Bolsheviks were among the least representative of Jews. If not the least. The Bolsheviks, in contrast to the Mensheviks and other socialist parties at the time had way less Jews.
They weren't seen as a Jewish movement.
And there was also the Bundes as well.
We could talk about how among the Jews, the Bolsheviks were simply, their popularity was basically non-existent.
We could see this from the votes that occurred for the constituent assembly elections of 1917. Almost no Jews cast their ballots for the Bolsheviks. Even the proletarian Jews, the Jews of the working class who the only jews that supported the bolsheviks
by the way were them most of them went with the bundis now people are trying to establish
some kind of connection between nazism and bolshevism nothing Nothing could be further from the truth. I'll tell you directly what the Bolsheviks were saying at the time. The Bolsheviks were telling the Jewish workers that they are part of the Russian people. They're part of russian civilization they need to join with the
russian workers they need to join with the workers of the russian empire hand in hand as a
united working class to fight the capitalist elites they were pitting jewish worker against
jewish capitalist what's wrong with that elites. They were pitting Jewish worker against Jewish capitalist.
What's wrong with that?
The Zionists were trying to
recruit these Jews, by the way, and say,
no, you'll never be accepted in Russia. Go
to Palestine. Go take over Palestine.
And what did the Bolsheviks say?
They said that Zionism was a reactionary
and bourgeois nationalist movement, which during the Civil War, they fought not only in spirit,
not only polemically, but violently. The Bolshevik Cheka, led by the non-Jew by the way felix gerzinski jailed and shot zionis prominent zionis funded and bankrolled the russian white army the counter-revolutionary army. The British Empire, which was
behind the Balfour Declaration,
actually sent troops to
invade Russia to topple the
Bolshevik government. The idea that there's
some kind of connection between Bolshevism
and Zionism is a cynical
lie.
You know what there was a connection between, though?
The Nazis and the Zionists.
Look up the Havara agreement where the Nazis agreed
because of their hatred of Jews, because of their anti-Semitism,
to transfer millions of Jews to Palestine as a way of evacuating them from Europe. You don't even
have to look at the Nazis, though, because straight from the horse's mouth, Theodore Herzl,
the founder of Zionism, said directly that the greatest allies of the Zionist movement will be the anti-Semites.
Not the Bolsheviks who are telling the Jews that they shouldn't be going to Palestine,
that they should stay in Russia and fight side by side with the working class of the Christian faith and the Muslim faith and of the Russian
ethnicity and of all the other ethnicities in the Russian Empire. The Bolsheviks didn't exclude
non-ethnic Russians from their ranks. Obviously, we know that. Stalin was a Georgian, by the way. Khrushchev was a Ukrainian.
Many of the leaders of the Soviet Union would be Ukrainians following Stalin's death.
There was nothing exclusively Russian about it, but at the time it was clear to everyone that by and large, the Bolshevik movement was a movement of the great Russian working class majority.
It was in the name, the Bolsheviks. Do you know what Bolshevik means? It comes from the root word
Bolshoi, which in Russian means great or majority or big. That's what Bolshevik means.
It was no exclusive Jewish minority taking power and killing Christians.
The majority of the soldiers of the Red Army were Christian peasants,
who actually kept and retained their faith.
During World War II, when they fought the Nazis,
the majority of the soldiers of the Red Army, likewise, the Christian faith and it's even said by some in the Orthodox Church that Stalin in private at least was himself a believer was himself an Orthodox Christian so the notion that Bolshevism is somehow connected to Zionism and is somehow a Jewish supremacist movement that wanted to attack and kill Russian Christians, it's nonsense. The majority of Bolsheviks came from Christian backgrounds themselves. And actually, Christianity as a religion
formed the unconscious basis of the Bolsheviks' own motivations. I implore you to read about
the psychology of Bolsheviks. Read about their motivations. Read about the thing that was driving them to
devote their lives to this cause. It was all in line with Christian values. There's a reason why
President Putin said himself, for example, that the Code of Communist Builders, which was published in the Soviet Union in the post-war period, as a guide for communism, a moral guide. He said the same values are in the Bible, the exact same values values this notion somehow that the bolsheviks uh have anything to do
with israel's atrocities in gaza is even more insulting when you realize that it was the bolshevik
party that inspired some of the
first forms of resistance
to the state of
Israel, in the form of
the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine, in the form of the various
communist parties in the Middle East,
connected to Moscow, connected to the Kremlin,
which violently resisted Zionism, which pledged their solidarity with the Arab cause.
I am hard pressed to understand where this notion that the Bolsheviks were somehow
Jewish comes from.
The fact that there were a few Jews
in the Bolshevik party
and in the early stages
within the Bolshevik leadership
isn't all that meaningful to me. I don't
understand. Why aren't you pointing out the disproportionate Latvian presence that was there before Brestlid Vosk? Why aren't you pointing out the sizable Georgian presence? Stalin, for example, Beria, for example, all Georgians. Why aren't you pointing out the disproportionate Ukrainian presence? Why is the Jewish presence, which wasn't even big for the period after the20s, by the way,
why is that so striking to people to the point where they're saying the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement?
Well, I'll tell you exactly why.
Because this is done not in good faith, not from the perspective of people just speaking their mind and speaking
their opinion, but a methodical attempt, a cunning and methodical conspiracy, yes, by neo-Nazis,
to spread and proliferate this failed ideology of neo-Nazism
because the origin of this claim
is in the Nazis.
Look up to history. It was the
Nazis who claimed
that the Jews, that the Bolsheviks were
a Jewish movement. Why did they do that? Because the
communist movement in Germany was huge.
And one of the ways they could discredit communism was by saying it was Jewish. Why did they want to
discredit communism? It's very simple. Because the German workers wanted to seize power from, yes, an
international cabal of bankers and capitalists, which ruled over Germany and who actually
appointed Adolf Hitler to his position of power so that he would invade and destroy the Soviet Union on their behalf.
It was always the Soviet Union, which was the enemy.
It's the legacy of the Bolshevik movement that built the Soviet Union.
It's the legacy of the Bolshevik movement that built modern
China. Most of the people in the third world, including in Palestine, that are now fighting against
the Zionists, their parents were educated in Moscow. The Bolshevik legacy is the foundation of all forms of anti-Western
struggle and struggle against the Western hegemony. It all owes a debt to the Bolshevik
Revolution of 1917, from India to Africa.
The Bolshevik legacy in presence there is indisputable, and I can prove it to you.
Straight from the horse's mouth, it was the Nazis themselves who attacked Bolshevism precisely on the grounds that Bolsheviks
were empowering Africans, Asians, Arabs, Indians, Latin Americans, to rise up against the so-called white race.
Where do you think the theory of Arianism came from, the superiority of the Aryan race?
Because during Hitler's time, 90% of the world was enslaved to a few countries in the West, to Britain, to Germany, to France.
PJ, thank you so much.
And when I say enslaved, I mean enslaved, literally enslaved, like how the U.S. went occupied
and took over Haiti and actually
enslaved its population.
The British did whatever
they wanted in Egypt and in
India. They were the masters.
The Egyptians, the Indians,
they were the slaves.
Is that a dignified existence?
So the Bolsheviks were here telling all of these people to rise up and overthrow the yoke of the foreign imperialists and colonialists.
And lo and behold, here comes Hitler, claiming it's a Jewish plot. It's not a Jewish plot.
This real Zionist plot was enforcing Western colonialism in the Middle East by establishing a permanent foothold of Western hegemony there in the form of the state of Israel.
Make no mistake, the patterns of colonial barbarism and depravity in Gaza mirror exactly the same methods used by apartheid South Africa and the Nazis themselves in their bloodthirsty march across Eastern Europe.
When they torched and massacred the citizens and people of Belarus, was that a fight
against the Jews? What did the Belarusian people do to deserve the wrath of the Nazis? Why were the
Slavs called subhuman untermench that the Nazis thought they could do anything to and it not be immoral and it be justified?
Make no mistake.
The Nazis that are trying to hijack the anti-Zionist cause share far more in common with the Zionists than the Bolsheviks they're trying to prevent you from reading up on and learning about. The Bolsheviks are guilty only for establishing the most advanced modern organization to represent the working class yes a revolutionary
organization one that could actually successfully challenge the powers that be and it did so
successfully ask yourself the question why it's going viral on Elon Musk's esk's that the
Bolshevik party somehow should be maligned and accused of being a bloodthirsty Jewish movement
that wanted to kill millions of Christians.
This is nothing more than American Cold War propaganda against the Soviet Union.
The same lies that these Nazis are spreading about the Bolsheviks are the same ones the Zionists were spreading during the Cold War. Get your priorities straight.
Wake up. The same fight that the people of Gaza are fighting now was the same fight the Belarusian
partisans and the Soviet partisans were fighting
against the Nazis. It's the same
fight the Bolsheviks were fighting
when they were trying to expel the foreign
occupation and foreign presence
on Russian soil. Make no mistake.
Cantreezy, thank you so much, brother. Make no mistake cantreezy thank you so much brother make no mistake about it
every single major western power on earth invaded russian soil
to take over russia's land and resources and minerals and wealth
and handed over to the international capitalist class.
And it was the Bolsheviks who stood in the way of that agenda and defended the sovereignty of Russia, the Russian people, and its wealth.
Compare that to the maniac, and yes, he was, it's a matter of fact, homosexual Adolf Hitler.
Adolf Hitler sold out Germany to the international class. He used the German people as cannon fodder and a ritualistic blood sacrifice to basically attack and do as much damage as they could to the soviet union
and the end result of it was the nazis looted all of the gold of eastern europe
transferred it to the offshore banks of the british empire
they themselves were deposed germ Germany became divided with the western portion
being completely controlled by the international capital's class directly. The eastern portion
acquiring the minimum of human dignity
and preserving Germany's national
traditions and the rest is history.
Now Germany today is part of NATO
and might have to get caught up in World War III
over Ukraine.
Is that in the interest of the German people?
Well, thank Adolf Hitler for getting the German people in the situation they're in now.
Had the communists taken power in the 1930s and thwarted the agenda of Adolf Hitler, Germany wouldn't be in NATO today.
Possibly the Soviet Union would still exist.
Israel wouldn't exist in Palestine either, by the way, because the Palestinians would have so much support from their brethren and from their allies,
who expressed nothing but solidarity with them historically.
In contrast to the West, by the way. They would probably have waged.
The Arab cause probably would have been
victorious. They probably would have expelled
the Zionists from their land.
Without the Havara agreement
having happened under Adolf Hitler, there possibly
wouldn't have ever been a state of Israel
to begin with.
So let's be clear. The past mattered. Setting the record straight matters. The Nazis were losers.
The Bolsheviks were winners. There's a reason they want you demonizing the Bolsheviks
and having nothing but negative thoughts about
the Bolsheviks while having sympathy
with the Nazis. It's nothing but a trap.
The Nazis, when they were prominent,
when they were a real, powerful
movement, when they were in real powerful movement, when they were
in power in Germany,
were only there insofar as they
were a tool of the international capitalist
class.
All the evidence supports this.
And they fumbled
immediately, by the way. The whole ideology was based on the supremacy of the Aryan race and the ability of Germany to win wars, and it lost the war. So that should have buried it forever. Why are they having people cling
to these failed ideologies
and these failed movements?
Sure, the Soviet Union no longer
exists. That's not the Bolsheviks
fault. Soviet Union existed
for 70 years. Until
after Stalin died,
it was
going only uphill,
even after Stalin died.
What happened is that
the post-Stalinist generation
of rulers
in the Soviet Union fumbled the bag.
That's not the Bolsheviks fault.
That's the fault of the revisionist bureaucratic clique,
which took advantage of Stalin's mercy, actually.
They claimed the Bolsheviks were so bloodthirsty.
No, they're not, and I can prove it to you.
Khrushchev still had his head after Stalin died.
If Stalin was truly a bloodthirsty murderer, he would have, and potentially should have, killed far more people. Instead, he
allowed this clearly antagonistic element right under his nose, which he knew about, by the way,
this liberal class of bureaucrats to continue living and existing,
they eventually take power and destroy the gains of the Russian people,
leading to probably one of the biggest calamities of the 20th century,
if not the modern age as a whole, which was the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
In any case, I think it's time we bring up challengers who want to defend.
Because here's the curious thing, and this is why I know these are bad faith actors.
I see Post get millions of views with 10,000 likes,
accusing the Bolsheviks of being a Jewish movement,
spreading lies and slander,
repeating American Cold War propaganda,
deep state propaganda
against the legacy of communism.
And as soon as I challenge them to just defend these claims, with the minimum of scrutiny, they block me.
They flee.
They run away.
They avoid confrontation.
Why is that?
If these are good faith actors, if these are people acting with some sincerity, why won't they defend the claims that they're making?
You see these posts all the time on X, accusing Len of being by the way lenin wasn't a jew at
all the claim that alexander blank was a jew is a forgery lenin's grandfather wasn't jewish
there were two alexander bl. One was Jewish, but the time doesn't match up with Lenin's actual family history. Lenin's actual grandparents had no Jewish ancestry whatsoever, but German ancestry.
So that's another thing we can litigate if anyone wants to, but it really doesn't matter anyway.
Because the idea that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement is just a lie.
Plain and simple.
Sure, there were many Jews in the socialist movement of the 20th century and late 19th century.
Why shouldn't there be, by the way?
Parties that are forming, which require educated people, and which are simultaneously telling the Jews, hey, you can be part of this movement, and we're not going to exclude you or discriminate against you, but we see you as equals, why wouldn't that be appealing to that there's a
reason so many other minorities join the bolsheviks as well because it was one of the only
political strong political formations at least that really was welcome to all of the Russian people, not just people of the Russian ethnicity,
but all of the people part of Russian civilization.
In any case, I want a single right-winger to come and basically make their case.
I mean, I see it so often said that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement.
How could that be if only 6% of the Bolshevik party was Jewish?
I'm confused.
Can anyone clear this up for me?
I'm aware there were some Jews in the Bolshevik leadership, but they were never a majority. There was also some Georgians. There was also some Latvians. There was also some Poles. I also see all these infographics, which are just lies. I have to explain something
to right-wing illiterates. If you just put a David Star in front of someone's face, it doesn't mean
they're Jewish. You actually have to back that up with some kind of source.
The claim that Stalin is Jewish is ridiculous.
The claim that Felix Zersinski is Jewish is ridiculous.
You putting a Jewish star over their pictures is just cynical.
It's a cynical form of lying, to be honest. And my theory is actually the majority of these neo-Nazis are actually nihilists, who don't even believe in the things that they're saying.
If you watch the documentary, Europa, the the last battle even its creators admit that 70 percent
of the factual claims they make are made up lies that's what the creators say i think it's more
than 70 percent by the way way. But cynically,
they just lie and make things
up and hope that uneducated
and illiterate people will just believe it.
And this is what's so important
about the Bolshevik movement.
In contrast to the Nazi
movement and other movements, it encouraged education most of all. The most important thing was education. To be a Bolshevik, you had to be well read, not just on Marxist literature, but on what Lenin said the whole treasure and wealth
of mankind, you had to be exposed to it.
You had to read books.
You had to know about poetry.
You had to know about art. You had to know
about history. You had to know about
these things. You had to enrich and fill
your mind with a minimum acquaintance of facts. Yes, scientific facts as well. The reason there's so many conspiracy theories about the Bolsheviks is because they were a movement of people who promoted education.
So there's a barrier to entry there.
Not any idiot could join the Bolshevik party, and for good reason.
Look at how many idiots there are on X who buy into Europa
the last battle. How many of you actually
attempted to
check the veracity of the
claims that it's making on a factual level?
Probably none of you.
Well, you should. You should have critical
thinking. You should read books. You should educate yourself. If there's going to be any kind of revolutionary movement that challenges the Zionists in power, that challenges the hegemony, that challenges the status quo, it has to be made up and led by people who read books,
who are educated, who think critically, who don't just believe anything they see on the internet.
What's wrong with that?
I mean, the Nazi rank and file was just full of a bunch of idiots.
The party membership.
Hitler was an idiot.
Hitler didn't read anything.
Hitler made all of these claims about Marxism.
He never read a single book by Karl Marx in his entire life.
The other Nazi party members,
they were even more illiterate.
Hitler himself
was shocked by what
happened in the Soviet Union in the late 30s.
He said, where did all the Jews go? Stalin purzed
all of them.
He didn't realize that the only reason there was so many prominent Jews in the first place
was just because there was an education disparity.
It wasn't because Stalin hated Jews.
Once the Russians, the non-Jewish Russians became more educated under Stalin, they replaced and pretty much accounted for all of the disproportionate ethnic overrepresentation that was previously there.
Because finally you had a population of people who actually read books and could read and write and had secondary education that were there, and there was no longer such a huge Jewish overrepresentation, if any, overrepresentation at all.
But I'm curious because I hear nothing but crickets from these same people spreading these lies,
and I'd like some pushback.
I'd like someone to come and just defend the claim
that the Bolsheviks were a Jewish movement.
Can anyone defend this claim?
A single person?
Is there a single person
capable of coming up here and defending this claim?
Is there anyone?
Literally anyone. I know that... Is there anyone?
Literally anyone.
I know that Let's go Brando 45.
I don't know what he's saying to cope,
but I encourage my followers to go and inform him
about the space that's happening right now.
Because maybe he's just not informed. He was here before.
Maybe he disconnected due to a technical
a technical
difficulty. Anyway, bring
him here.
Bring him here. I mean, if not
him, will anyone else defend the claim why is this how can a post
get 10 000 likes surely one of the people who like that post will come here and defend it.
But it's crickets.
Why are they so scared of me?
By the way, let's go Brando.
He agreed to debate me.
He said, the leader of your movement, I'll debate him.
Now he claims he's only going to debate Jackson because Jackson has more followers.
The movement that is challenging Brandon is the one I lead anyway
he's making excuses and it's honestly
nothing new it's just kind of
one of those things it's just kind of like
Jay Dyer all over again
but it's okay because
I only have about 15 more minutes and then i'm going to be going on
r t live to do actual news which i have scheduled at nine but it would be a real big shame if not a
single person steps up to the challenge at all between now and then.
I mean, will literally no one do it?
I need everyone to understand there's a clear pattern going on.
I challenge Keith Woods to debate me. He says no. He wants to debate Jackson.
I challenge Jay Dyer to debate me.
He says no. He finally agrees after getting bullied, and then he just kind of interrupts every sentence.
He wouldn't let me get a sentence in, and then he kicks me after two minutes.
Orthodox canonist, won't debate me.
Only Jackson.
I kind of have a feeling that there's something about me in particular that really terrifies people when it comes to
debate i don't know why i'm so terrifying to them and if i'm so terrifying to you by the way you
could just start telling the truth if you're if you're scared that if you debate me and I'm going to expose you as a
fraud and a liar, why don't you just start telling the truth? Why don't you stop lying? Why don't you
stop spreading and telling lies? Because you're a bad faith actor. You know you're lying. If you didn't know you were lying, you
wouldn't be so afraid to debate me. You would be confident in the things you're saying
and actually keep that same energy when actually in the same voice call as me or in the same voice
call as me or in the same Twitter space
as me, you'd keep the same exact
energy. Why don't
they do that?
Keep
the same energy as when you make your post.
If you're not willing to keep the same energy as when you make your post. If you don't, if you're not willing to keep the same energy,
then tell your followers that you're lying to them.
Do the decent thing and admit you're a liar.
I'm not a big, scary monster.
I'm just somebody who's forcing these people to be honest about their real intentions and their real agenda.
Why are you scared of me?
Why are you so terrified of me?
If you're not educated on the subject, that's fine.
But you're making claims about the subject.
Why won't you back up those claims?
I mean, let's see.
Has he responded at all
In any capacity?
I'm going to have RTSG as co-host
Because I want to see if there's someone
requesting to speak that I cannot see
potentially
I'm Is anyone requesting that you can see or what's going on?
I can only see one person accepting, but it doesn't seem like a Wignat or anything like that.
Who is it?
It's at Musa underscore Muhammad 32.
Well, bring them on anyway, because we'll just get anyone a chance.
We won't, we won't. We're not
everyone is welcome to witness.
Anyone who wants.
Yeah.
Yeah. All right.
I've given them speaker.
There's also someone else requesting right now.
All right.
We're getting a bunch of people.
Sure, guys, remember, we only have 10 more minutes.
Only request if you actually disagree, guys.
Yeah.
We only have 10 more minutes because at 9 I have to be on RT.
But let's see you know how's I'll
debate you on that I'll play doubles advocate
and sure
sure yeah
um you give me a few minutes, because I want to see what Bradley was arguing and then try to...
We don't have a few minutes because I only have to tell that.
But I'll tell you what he was saying.
His original post went as follows. said more or less uh let me find it what he said was
he made the claim that um let me grab it here it is
the bolshevik revolution also known as the great october socialist revolution, was the first successful Marxist coup. First thing he said that was a lie was that it was a coup. 85% of the Bolshevik leadership was Jewish. So it's like a black and white thing. I mean is is he telling the truth or is he lying about that
they slaughtered millions of christians uh again that's not true um co-opt the country culture
subvert it rule over ashes how could, rule over ashes. How could
they rule over
ashes when
even Winston
Churchill
admitted that
Stalin came to
Russia where
they only had
wooden plows
and left it
with nuclear
weapons,
super industrialized
the country
and brought
it into the
modern age.
I don't
understand.
But if you want to, if you want to defend that,
please, by all means.
There's no way to defend it, but there is a way
to, you know, play devil's advocate on this and
just argue and just knowing that's going to get
crushed.
Hold on. If it's only the devil's advocate, I want to see if this guy might be
sincerely believe it's real.
Go ahead. Tadus, go ahead.
Yeah, so your argument is that
the Jews were against the bours were against the Bulls want to see it, right?
I'm not trying to get into the JQ right now, but
No, no, my argument was that
The Bolsheviks were not a Jewish movement,
nothing close to 85% of its leadership
was Jewish. Nothing. I mean, it's
a baffling
claim.
Okay, so I can agree.
There was not even a single month
because you have to understand
the central committee, there was a lot of changes going on there
month by month in the early years. The most Jewish representation was four out of seven. For one month,
four out of seven people in the central committee were jewish okay for one
month okay regardless whether whether they're a jewish or not that's not really in my argument
okay is whether okay were they against the bourgeoisie?
Every single Jew who cast their support behind the Bolshevians? Were the Bolsheviks against the bourgeoisie?
Yes.
Okay, why were they funded by Wall Street?
They weren't. Not in any capacity.
Yes, they were.
Yes, they were.
What's your evidence?
I posted it, and you deleted it.
I literally shared it right there.
What, what, I'm streaming on kick right.
Yeah, I'm streaming on kick right now.
I haven't...
And one of you guys deleted it.
Okay, well, I assume you're citing Anthony Sutton.
Yeah, and Robert Spence.
Okay, well, let's just begin with Anthony Sutton, because I'm more familiar with his lies that he's been making up.
Even if you, the problem with Anthony Sutton is the way he presents the facts, and I'll tell you the actual truth behind
everything he said, right? The truth is there is one guy from Sweden named Olaf Ashberg,
who is a low-level banker who happened to personally ideologically have communist
views. Olaf
Ashberg
barely, barely
helped the Bolsheviks
out a little bit.
But besides him, there is
absolutely no evidence for any Wall Street support of the Bolsheviks.
Jacob Schiff, for example, supported the Karenski provisional government,
and then as soon as the Bolsheviks took power, immediately supported the Allied invasion,
and actually Wall Street funded the White Army in Russia and there's direct evidence for that.
The Wall Street also funded the Nazis. I mean, they funded like everything.
The Wall Street funded the Nazis. They funded the White Counter-Revolution.
There's no evidence
for them funding the Bolsheviks
at all. The Bolsheviks didn't need...
Yes, Lenin was actually in
Wall Street.
Now you're just being
a little ridiculous. Even Sutton
himself won't make the claim
that Lenin was in Wall Street.
The claim is that Trotsky was in Wall Street,
not Lenin.
And that even all of the money
that Trotsky was able to raise,
because I agree Trotsky was a shady guy.
He wasn't even a Bolshevik, though.
That's the problem.
Trotsky opportunistically jumped on the bandwagon of the revolution at the last moment.
His intentions were snuffed out years after the revolution, and he became the number one enemy of the Soviet government. But in any
case, all of Trotsky's funds were seized in Canada when he tried to return to Russia. So even
then, it's meaningless. By the way, Ashberg was not even exclusively loyal to the Bolsheviks at all. He just had communist sympathies. He tried to get a $50 million loan for the Imperial Russian Ministry of finance on behalf of the czarist government
before any so any kind of support for the bolsheviks or sympathy with the bolsheviks
um aspergs it's called the nya banken that supposedly supported the Bolsheviks, and it could only have constituted a minuscule portion compared to the primary subsidies, which they seized from the actual Russian bourgeoisie. That was the majority of their revenue and their
funding was actually coming from that.
They actually took over
the wealth that was
controlled by the ruling class in Russia.
And moreover,
keep in mind that the so-called support
that we're talking about isn't for the revolution.
It's for the aftermath of the revolution when the Bolsheviks were fighting in the Civil War.
That's when Ashberg supposedly was trying to help them out, which you could only do low-key, by the way, because the United States and all of the major powers in Europe
committed troops to Russia.
So that would be considered treason, actually.
He disconnected.
Let's bring him back.
So let me, let me continue um let me continue now that you have speaker uh i also want to say that look we could get into the nitty gritty details about Olaf Ashberg, because any revolutionary movement is going to have a few wealthy individuals, a handful, not even a handful, who are sympathetic for ideological reasons, betraying their own class and their own class interests.
But, listen, listen, all I need to do is ask you the following question. betraying their own class and their own class interests.
But listen, listen, all I need to do is ask you the following question.
Regarding Trotsky, why would everyone be completely loyal to the revolution that Solzhenitsyn was part of the revolution?
No, he wasn't.
Solzhenitsyn was the sign. Yes and he turned against it. No he wasn't. Solzhenitsyn was the son. Yes he was. Yes he was. Jesus Christ. Originally he was part of
it. Almost everyone that was part of the revolution betrayed it.
Because it was a it was a
Solzhenitson's parents
Why would they, why would they be completely loyal to it?
Why?
This is the problem I have.
I think that people who spread propaganda against the Bolsheviks are actually porn addicts
because your impulse control is incredible.
The fact that you can't shut up for two seconds and let me get a sentence in
and start screaming that Solzhenitsyn who was born after the revolution
and whose parents were victimized with it was somehow loyal to the revolution.
I don't understand what that's supposed to mean.
I don't understand... He was part of the movement.
He was loyal to the movement.
But he was born after the...
He was born after it happened.
Okay, yes, but he was...
His parents were against it, where he was loyal to it.
He was born after it happened. So all that means is that he was loyal to it. He was born after it happened.
So all that means is that he was raised in Soviet primary school.
That means nothing.
Anyway, the point I'm trying to get at and hammer home here,
because I don't have a lot of time now that I have to go and have other obligations,
but I want to ask you the following question, because we can get into these nitty-gritty
details about Olaf Ashberg, which will lead nowhere.
I promise they won't.
Answer the following question.
As soon as the Bolsheviks take power,
all sovereign debts were liquidated overnight.
Sorry, I didn't hear you. One of us got disconnected.
If the Bolsheviks were financed by Wall Street,
why did they liquidate all sovereign debts overnight that were owed to international banks by the Russian
government overnight, all wiped.
I mean, everyone's going to have
their own stance.
They're going to work together at one point.
They're going to turn against each other.
So you're saying as soon as they took power,
they turned against them, as soon as they took power, they turned against them, as soon as they took power?
Because they wiped the debt as soon as they took power, right when they took power. Anything? I guess not
Nothing
I can't really hear you
one of us is disconnecting
I'm just going to say that you're just spreading
like a bunch of bullshit yourself
it's like little bullshit.
Okay, why did they wipe the sovereign bit?
I don't know how dumb you have to be to believe in this bullshit.
Okay, do you have an argument?
Be yourself.
Spread whatever the lies you want.
I support freedom of speech.
Yeah, but do you have an argument, though?
People are going to realize
what you're doing there.
But don't you think
you're kind of acting
irrationally by not
making an argument
while saying this?
Okay, he left.
He disconnected.
Like I said, guys,
I don't understand
I don't understand
why people are so
committed to something they can't defend rationally at all in any capacity.
But he just disconnected and left and then claimed that I'm spreading a bunch of, and I quote him, I don't like to swear anymore, but I quote him, bullshit.
Um... him, I don't like to swear anymore, but I quote him, bullshit. Why is it bullshit if you can't make a single argument? I just asked you, why did they liquidate all the sovereign debt? You had no response. By the way, the Nazis didn't liquidate any debt.
They continued making payments to the Bank of International settlements even during the war.
Do you understand that?
Even during the war, IG Farben, on its board of of directors had people from Wall Street, American citizens from Wall Street, from Wall Street, on the board of shareholders for IG Farben.
While the U.S. was at war with the Nazis.
All the while the Nazis continued making payments to the Bank of International Settlements
using gold they stole from Czech Slovakia.
So it's all about debt, actually.
You can make all of these claims about Jews and Wall Street, but follow the money trail.
Follow who's paying the debt and who's liquidating the debt.
The Bolsheviks canceled the debt overnight.
They canceled all of it.
Wiped it all clean.
The Nazis continued paying the debt from the Treaty of Versailles.
Actually, IG Farben and all these mega industrial cartels in Germany
were created by venture capitalists
from Wall Street
to basically capitalize
off of the Treaty of Versailles
debt, which itself
was being exacted from the British
and the French to pay back Wall Street and America for its loans during World War I.
So you had this international finance capitalist machine, which was propping up the German
war machine in German industry, just to pay back debt. It was all going back to debt.
And the Bolsheviks canceled the debt. Usury is based on debt. The power of the financial capitalist international
cabal of bankers is based on debt. The Nazis continued paying the debt. The Bolsheviks wiped the
slate clean overnight. That's really all you have to know about this topic.
Ladies and gentlemen, that is the
reason the Bolsheviks are demonized.
That's the reason you're seeing so many
viral posts on eggs demonizing
the Bolsheviks. A grassroots
populist, revolutionary
movement, which actually not only successfully overthrew the ruling class, but did so independently only based on the support from the workers and peasants of Russia.
I want to end on a final note, guys.
We are entering a new era.
The alt-right and the neo-Nazis will no longer be allowed to be the vanguard of any dissident movement in the United States.
The future is Bolshevik.
The future is red.
The future generation of dissidents and revolutionaries and anti-establishment thinkers,
they will be Bolsheviks.
Bolshevism is in.
Neo-Nazism is out.
I say that and I make that vow to everyone listening here bolshevism is in nazism is out we bolsheviks are taking control of the operation now the alt-right failed miserably, and will no longer be possessing any ideological hegemony over the movement of dissidents and anti-establishment forces.
We make that vow to everyone here today.
Ladies and gentlemen,
it's been good.
Hopefully,
hopefully the right wing will stop running from me.
But as you saw today, the one person who had the courage to defend this claim,
look how irrationally they behaved and acted.
It speaks for itself.
Goodbye, everyone.
What's up? Stalin, Beria Gulag. I appreciate you, everyone. What's up?
Stalin, Beria Gulag.
I appreciate you, guys.
I'd like to keep streaming,
and I will be streaming again Thursday.
We'll be returning to our more or less regular schedule.
But... more or less regular schedule. But I have to...
I'm going to be going on RT, so I'll see you guys.
Bye-bye See you later
See you later