ISR*EL LOSING | IRAN INVASION | NO KINGS

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, Oh,

the cosmos

you

d'em and the

one

the

one

cosmos

d'em and

a

cosmos d'em

and the most most aging thing The star is bright

Her eyes on red the blade is swift and horses tread oh

all the cosmos sleeping pain allah cosmos eating pain allah cosmos God Godosmosis living pain Allah Cosmos Sidiying

Phaarvah

Bosmos hidden

VIII

Allah cosmos

Jinni

Phaasmos

living God

God God

God God God Godavos Mishinimbi Khamma Ravda's way

for us to heed

Your revolutionary

dynasty

HALArosmiri Mika God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God i belong to lynch

i belong to lenin's fight the earth has turned

and within

my

Allah cross

pros for Sidi Ging

Allah Vosso Sidi Ging

Allah Gipi Ging

Allah Gael Allah God blesses you and God God

God

God

God

God God God Godhahe Allahe

God

Allah must be

Allah will see him God God

God's oxygen pay

God God God

God God

God God

God God

God I'm not a lot. I'm not a lot.

I'm not.

I'm not... I know. I'm not...

...you

Oh... o'u-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-a-d-a-d-a-dha.

The Gala-was-mossi d'n't-a-law-vossi-d-d'-d'- God God was my God blesses

meeting

Allah God

God

God

God

God God God God God God God Oh, yeah, yeah, oh, the star is bright, horizon red, the blade is swift and horses tread

oh la bus most seen in bay

allah was must bein bay

allah boss must be in pain

hala rossmosmoschus in pain God bless me Allah God blesses Him

God

God

God

God

God

God God God God

God

God

God God God God

God God for us to heed

Forever

Shared

Dynasty

God

Allah provost me

Allah cross M Allah

Pohmusti in M

Pah Pha Prok M God, La Cosmesee Yeah Anna cross

New God are the Postmosmosis in pain

from

Babylon

to Lenin's fight

the earth has turned

and breathed

my All the cross pros pros proceedings Turned and breath in my head.

All the cross-proceding planning.

Another proposition, baby. What are you know?

What are you?

Oh,

you know,

I'm a lot of and I'm

a new and you know what's coming out

what is

I'm on and

I'm

that

I'm

on and the uh... I'm

a

I'm and

I'm going to be I'm

a lot of

I'm not

I'm

I'm

I'm gonna I'm I don't know. I don't know. and the I'm not

I'm not

I'm a I'm

and I'm gonna have a lot of

and the other

and the I'm

and I'm and I'm not

the

I'm I'm a lot of I'm not I'm not I'm going to

I'm

I'm

I'm The kid

CCP with the five

What the fuck is up, bro?

Australia's Danny.

What's up, man?

What's up with the 10, bro?

I see you.

What's going on?

What the fuck is going on what the

fuck is going on

stupid ass

fucking ads

what up y'all

what up y'all

all right

first of all my Iraqi beard is growing in so I just wanted to update you about that. The second thing is that my prediction about the Iran ground invasion didn't come through. I'm notoriously bad at predictions when it comes to precise timing. And then I literally yelled to Jackson today over text.

I'm like, Jackson, you made me look so stupid in front of everyone.

Rizio, what's up?

But, you know, look, here's why I have an excuse.

Because two days ago, Trump randomly delayed it by 10 days, okay?

Trump is fucking gaming the markets.

He's super unpredictable.

It's all for inside trading.

Don't crucify me if I can't get the dates exactly lined up and correct.

But I'm not going to be like Scott Ritter and just pretend I didn't get that shit wrong.

I got it fucking wrong.

All right?

Going forward, I want to reiterate, if I ever say it's happening next week, two weeks,

when it comes to some shit that's outside of our control, just keep in mind that that

can change and that it's not always

airtight 100%.

And, you know,

and by the way, if you don't know what I'm talking about,

the prediction was that there was going to be a

invasion of Bolotistan

region in Iran, just slightly inside the Gulf of Oman,

passing through this weekend, specifically Saturday.

Did not happen.

All right.

I'll say that did not happen.

I got it wrong.

But two days ago, Trump randomly did a switcheroo and said he's going to delay it by 10 days.

However, that's not the end of the story.

Okay?

I'll also give myself a little bit of credit while we're doing that and talk about how well look i was

correct about the fact that 3,500 i named 3,500 u.s troops have officially arrived in the middle

east as of today uh as they're preparing for a ground

invasion against iran yeah guys good morning after four weeks of war in the middle east the

conflict grinds on reports indicate the united states is preparing for a possible

weeks long ground operation in ir Iran that would include thousands of U.S. service members.

Antimatter, what's up?

I just want to show this to y'all.

Just so you know, I'm not Scott Ritter.

I don't just lie.

You know, I'm not just a liar.

Over the weekend, the USS Tripoli manned with 3,500 troops, including 2,500 Marines, arrived in the CENTCOM area of operation.

If an operation is ordered to seize Iranian oil facilities or enriched uranium, it's expected that both special forces and conventional forces would be used.

This comes as the United States and Israel launched a series of strikes against Iranian military infrastructure over the weekend, including hitting Iran's nuclear development facilities.

In Operation Rising Lion, we hit very hard the entire chain of nuclear production in Iran.

We hit everything from the production capabilities and the factories, all the components,

to the centrifuges and beans, and so on. The entire production chain was hit.

Look this way. It was affected.

And I can't see you.

It was delayed, but it was not completely destroyed.

With the Israelis looking east, they're also looking north where early Saturday

an IDF soldier from Connecticut was killed in southern Lebanon by a Hezbollah rocket.

His name was Moshe Katz and he was 22 years old.

Is it Israeli was killed?

Oh!

Oh wow!

Oh wow, what a treat.

Okay, so

yes, the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit has in fact arrived in the Middle East, and this is being reported on by the New York Post, who I want to say is a disgusting website, hideous, disgusting,

unforgivable website full of fucking ads everywhere.

But I managed to get rid of the ads kind of

and so this is readable

three warships from San Diego

didn't I tell you they're coming from San Diego

more than 2,000 Marines

heading to the Middle East

it's an amphibious assault ship with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit.

I'm pretty sure I mentioned them.

They were on route.

I'm pretty sure they already arrived.

And the USS Boxer is carrying the 11th unit as far as, is an amphibious ready group.

So these groups, you know, this is for a land invasion, all right?

Look, it's for a land invasion.

It's got infantry, combat engineers vehicles and aircraft okay uh it's the most versatile flexible lethal global response force the united states has to offer

so they're going to go to balochistan, try to pitch a tent, create a base, and mount a very long ground invasion of Iran.

That's what things are looking like.

Keep in mind that can change.

Keep in mind, Trump's is on his

menstrual cycle. He's very unpredictable. His insider trading menstrual cycle, which just has him

going back and forth, you know, here and there and zero to 100 and back and forth over and over again.

But so far it looks like they're taking steps and they're making preparations for a ground invasion.

Now, the ground invasion I thought was going to happen this weekend, but two days ago,

Friday, when the market closed, Trump said he's going to delay it by five days. I want to ask a simple

question, is there a single gorilla, is there a single member of the ACP who is on the stock market and just making money off of this shit?

For all the talent and intelligence that we have put together as a community, You would think that's, you are,

Samu, can you...

Okay, you don't have to donate to the stream,

but if you're a party member,

are you throwing that shit in the party's coffers?

Because what the fuck?

Like, y'all need to be on that stock.

Actually, I'm not telling you,

I'm not going to tell you to do that that because you're going to gamble your money away.

And only if you know what you're doing.

Don't take this as an order, all right?

I would just think there's some weird nerd who knows what they're doing and understands how all this shit works.

I sure as hell don't, right? Mostly been losing

money. Wow. Okay, so, uh, I'm just saying we need some like autism. Yeah, we need the autists,

for real. I'm going to be talking about autism today, by the way, in relation to the cosmic

marketing. We're going to have a very interesting stream. But, uh, yeah, that's a very, that's some

news that you should keep your eye on, but Trump is once again gaming the stock market for the insider trading buddies and here I am slamming

I am truly a man of the people I'm truly a man of the people you want to know why I'm a man

of the people you want to know why I'm a man of the people. You want to know why I'm a man of the people? You want to know why I'm a man of the people?

Maybe that's a bad thing. If I was a cynic, Jackson and I, if we were not even grifters, but just Machiavellian Alexander Kojev types, we would have forked the maga communism thing into like basically publicly selling out, which wasn't there in the original intention,

but because of how retarded the public interpreted what maga communism was, we very much

had the opportunity to do that. We could have easily forked it, twisted the meaning of it, in such a way that would have given us access to whatever channels of information there are for Trump's inner circle.

Fuck, I mean, Jackson easily could have made it into Trump's inner circle.

We could have made tens, hundreds of millions, billions of dollars from insider trading.

And then use that to fund the party.

But you know why we couldn't do that?

Because had we done such an awful thing to the public eye selling out, it would have killed your spirits, my guerrillas.

It would have killed your morale. It would have killed your spirits, my guerrillas. It would have killed your morale.

It would have broke your heart.

Such a long game.

Your heart couldn't afford such a long game.

The hearts of the masses could not afford such a long game.

Is it, what it had been rational, though?

I think about it.

I think about it.

What it had been rational to just get that fucking money,

pump it into a communist party.

And I think,

perhaps if there was someone else who could deliver this message

that would have been the thing Jackson and I should have done

but there's no one else who can deliver the message

am I wrong if I'm the person who asked But there's no one else who can deliver the message.

Am I wrong?

If I'm the person who has to deliver the message,

the best way that I can,

if I'm the one who has to rally your spirits and compel your morale

in the direction of having

the motivation to dedicate yourself

to this cause

I could not have played 4G chess

and just gotten the fucking money

and you know

come back

you would never have, you would never

see me the same.

Even though what I, behind the scenes, it would have been for a greater cause.

Your motivation, my guerrillas, your motivation is so precious and sensitive.

I speak as a cult leader. Do I not?

Your motivation is so precious.

Such a thin line separates it from total collapse so to speak so much incentives there's so much pressure there's I mean, we are at war with the fucking world.

You know, we just declared war on Uganda.

We just declared war on the Ugandan military.

But we're at war with the world, and all that we have is faith all that we have is faith that's it

that's all we have faith so this faith is more precious to me than all the hundreds and billions of dollars in the world.

Hundreds of millions and billions of dollars in the world.

And let me tell you something, my guerrillas. Let me tell you something.

I believe that the path we took, which was the clean path, which was a path devoid of selling out and grifting, that was worth more.

That's Bitcoin in 2001,

before it was even fucking invented.

You understand?

This faith, this morale,

this motivation that you have

when you wake up in the fucking morning

and you look at the sun

and you see Mao Zaitong's face,

when you're walking through life in this way where you can look at the fucking world around you and witness its development as it submerges into its opposing and contrary premises in this revolutionary cycle that we live within, to see the world with infrared vision. Fucking priceless.

Fucking priceless.

That's fucking rare.

You know?

It was absolutely.

Absolutely the correct move.

So many people are cynics. Oh, Haas, play it smart. Play it smart. I'm not going to play it smart.

At a certain point, the buck has to stop somewhere where there's no calculation. There's no strategy. There's no calculation there's no strategy there's no manipulativeness there's no deceit there's a direct faithfulness and devotion to an article of faith you raise to the status of a banner that can animate a core of militants, right?

Willing to spark the fucking fire

that's going to burn

this bitch down you understand

so

just to be clear

when we're talking about the insider trading regime, which is what it is, everyone close to Trump in that inner circle is getting fucking filthy rich because of what Trump is doing. He's telling them and they're fucking getting filthy rich off of it.

We could have had a piece of that money, okay?

But we didn't.

Why?

Because the message was more important.

But you know what?

I'll still kick myself for it i'll still beat beat myself up for it but what can you do

the message was more precious it was more important and uh this is why this is absolutely why it's not simply about abstract moral principles i don't believe in

abstract categorical imperatives that exist in the fucking sky i don't believe in abstract principles that you fart into a jar

and call sacred which is what the entire sphere of so-called ethics really just consists in

farting in a jar and calling this sacroscent.

But I believe in the effectiveness of communication. I believe in the message. I believe in the

message undiluted. I believe in being able to communicate to people something new.

Something that inspires them with a possibility, a belief in possibility, right?

I believe really in what already is unfolding right in front of our fucking eyes, right?

And it's so, there's all the, the, the pressure doesn't exist to adopt some other comprehensive worldview or ideology. The pressure

exists to succumb to nihilism and cynicism

and demoralization.

That's where the, that's the, what you're fighting, the jihad you're waging.

Oh my God, it's trail standing.

Holy fuck, bro.

Thank you.

The 25.

Appreciate you, bro.

Appreciate you, brother.

The jihad that you're waging is not a jihad simply against some other worldview or ideology or something the jihad you're waging is against the forces of demoralization you're waging a jihad on who but the kufar really that's what they are they're kufar trotskyites kufar left comms kufar ma coms kufar Maoist kufar democratic socialist kufar Eurocommunist kufar revisionist kufar Marxist but not Leninist

Kufar

Humanist Marxist

Lukkahs Fafers

They're all Kufr

They're every single one of them are Koffer

Gerald with the five They're all each and every one of them are kaffer.

Gerald with the five.

They're all, each and every one of them, kaffir.

They're all kaffir who deny the simple, the simplicity of the revolutionary message.

The simplicity of the revolutionary message, the simplicity of the synthesis

discovered and achieved

first by Lenin,

then by Stalin and Mao,

and so on.

They don't believe they lack belief marxism without belief that's what you call

marxism today in the west the kuffer marxism of kuffer and the kufr Trotskyites at the No Kings rally, by the way, they're there, waving red flags and making a big spectacle of a tradition.

They had no fucking part in building historically. Red flags whose only aura and power comes from the fact that

they are today and have been in the past been the banner under which the world's largest stockpile of nuclear weapons was kept.

That's where the power and the meaning actually comes from, you fucking Trotskyite rats and mice.

Comes from the mighty Soviet Union

and all of the countries that it inspired

the People's Republic of China

this was a real thing that happened in history

some of these koffer that's what they are I'm going to keep calling them they're kaffir some of these kufr, that's what they are. I'm going to keep calling them. They're

kaffir. Some of these kaffir, they reproach me. They say, Haas, you simply appeal to power and

authority. Isn't this like appealing to the power of the pharaoh? I say no. No, you filthy,

disgusting kaffar rat.

How dare you even speak to me?

But if I have to indulge, if I have to indulge.

The reason we point to the authority, to the power, to the greatness of China, the Soviet Union, even Russia today,

the DPRK, isn't because we blindly worship force. It's because that they had built what they

did from scratch proves that they were able to achieve

something. They were able

to achieve, not simply a

Marxism of the ass

hurt Trotsky with his glasses, upset

that nobody appreciates how

smart he thinks he is. They

achieved a relationship between the theory, the comprehensive and integral worldview that we call Marxism, Leninism, or communism, and the masses, the masses of tens, hundreds of millions of ordinary people in their nations, who they mobilized and organized into a mighty state machine.

Do you know how fucking difficult that is?

Unifying entire nations, building an entire fucking empire, which ultimately, by the way, ultimately, was suspended in air from one source, held together by one thing, only one thing, faith, which is exactly why in the USSR,

the minute they succumbed to demoralization and revisionism, the whole thing fucking blew apart

at the seams. That was an empire

of faith. And even today's

China is an empire

of faith. It's a faith that has

it has

submerged into the unconscious

for certain, for certain.

But go to the People's Republic of China today.

Go to the monuments to Mao Zetaeng.

Go to go to the things that actually serve as reminders of the humble origins of that state, the People's Republic of China.

And you'll see something, the sacred. People treated there as sacred. Nobody, nobody will trifle

with these things. Nobody will trifle at the Museum of the cpc nobody will trifle at the pilgrimages at the holy

sites the holy sites of mao and his sahaba the people's Liberation Army.

As a Shia, it's funny I'm saying that, but in any

case, that's what it was, by the way.

It was nothing else but that.

Volk has a precisely wonderful point. It's precisely these disgusting degenerate

Qafar liberals who trifle at the grave of Karl Marx. You see that one woman dressed like a hooker, dressed like a whore, attending

Karl Marx's grave, defiling it, mocking it. Sick, disgusting things because the disgusting

United Kingdom allows people to commit this kind of sacrilege, this blasphemy. In China, this wouldn't be

allowed. In Russia, this wouldn't be allowed. In Russia, you're not allowed. Are you kidding?

To visit Lenin's mausoleum, you can't even have your hands in your pocket. Okay.

But they trifle with it because it's not, why?

Because it's not sacred to them.

Because they say it openly, by the way, these disgusting Trotskyite Koffer. They say it openly. They say, well, it's not a religion. It's a science. No, fuck you. It is a religion. Literally, fuck you. It is a religion. It's more than a, by the way, more than a religion. What does religion even mean? Why do you, why is Islam sacred? You think Islam is sacred?

Because some Saudi piece of shit, Sheikh who looks like a deformed monkey is wagging his fucking finger?

No, Islam is sacred because there's a story behind Islam.

There's a story behind Islam that people intuitively recognize and acknowledge a sacred.

Right? The story of a man who came from nothing. intuitively recognize and acknowledge a sacred, right?

The story of a man who came from nothing in the desert and had nothing but a message of unity and justice

in the middle of nowhere against overwhelming odds,

toppled entire empires just with that message.

That's the whole point of religion.

What do you think religion is?

You think religion is here because of some finger-waving pederast, waving their finger at us,

telling us what the rules are because so-and-so said so? No, it's because of the story. It's the story that gets people, because that

story has the structure of what? Logos. Do you understand? That's exactly what it is. That story embodies and incarnates

the entire cosmic cycle that we intuitively recognize as reflecting purely and authentically, the most

fundamental reality that there is. The thing that animates everything in existence everything in existence is suspended in motion

within precisely this cycle the dialectical process right why are we so compelled to hear the story of beginning from nothing, from humble

beginnings, from literally from scratch, you are nothing, you are nobody, you have nothing.

But just because you have this message, you topple empires. Why does that resonate with us? Because there's

something about it that's true. There's something about it that reflects something back onto us

that we're putting out by virtue of our very existence. And we have the ability to recognize it because we understand the truth that it

communicates and the truth that it communicates is that the word is more fundamental than all the

incarnated wealth in the world.

All the gold and wealth

and might and the great works

and the Tower of Babel,

you fucking name it.

That's an after effect. Because isn't it, isn't it, isn't it just

obvious that before human beings can do great things, they need a fucking reason to wake up in the

morning? I mean, isn't that just common sense? Okay, we can do, we can build great pyramids.

We can do great things. Of course we can. We can build great weapons and great armies,

great militaries, full of hundreds of thousands of people. But why is it so easy for the army of Genghis Khan vastly outnumbered by these conventional

militaries to prevail? Why? Because the thing that comes first is the shit that compels us to wake up in the morning.

The shit that inspires us with the bravery and the courage to run into a line of gunfire and risk our life, knowing that it's in service

to something more fundamental

and precious than life itself.

That's what wins wars.

Not the thing,

you could have all the technology

and every

you could have the most complex and advanced

division of labor in the entire world

you could have all the technology in the world

it ultimately doesn't matter

the IRGc personnel who will inevitably confront and face our boys their armor their shield their defense they wear it on themselves. It's the article of faith they have.

They raise to the status of an article of faith. That their cause is just and that ours is wicked.

And you know why they're going to win?

Because they're fucking right.

This is exactly why Benjamin Netanyahu was wrong.

Benjamin Netanyahu tried to say that, what did he say?

Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan.

He was confused about Genghis Khan because he's a retard.

But his idea was that, well, you know,

Moraha, being good and moral has no material significance.

You see, this is, perhaps this is theologically a problem. has no material significance.

You see, this is perhaps this is

theologically a problem with Judaism.

Maybe.

I can't speak for the more esoteric advanced

forms of religious study within Judaism.

Maybe Netanyahu is just a caricature of what a Jew thinks, according to the Western Christian

tradition.

But nonetheless, this notion that just because the moral is not immediately self-same and identical with the material, that that means it doesn't exist at all, is exactly the problem I have with Zionism as an ideology when you think about it.

Just because the moral isn't immediately self-same at the level of form and appearance with the material doesn't mean there's no relationship between them.

It doesn't mean that they're not ultimately one thing and

unified and

share one

reality

it's just that

there's an

indirectness

with respect

to how they

come

to be united

right

and this is very important to understand you know uh there's many stories in

islam or christianity they share a story called the cave right people were persecuted in some city or some town and

God told them you know what just go sleep in this cave for I don't know 100 years or something

I don't know how long it was I don't know, 100 years or something. I don't know how long it was.

I don't know the details.

They went and they found a cave and they just went to sleep.

And then 20 or 100 years, whatever passed.

They came out, they went to the town and everyone had adopted their beliefs.

Not only were they no longer persecuted, everyone came around and realized they were right.

Now, what's the lesson here?

The lesson is that's the most obvious, direct, simplified way of explaining how being morally correct, there is a discontinuity with the material world in some sense, where you don't understand immediately

how that squares with what exists, but eventually, eventually, you will be shown how exactly

the word is in harmony with matter with what exists materially

right and that's the point of the story by the way.

This is the point of the story of the cave, you know?

Fuck, I'm like a preacher now.

But, uh, we have a slogan ourselves.

And what is it?

Allah Cosmos Jishen-Ping.

And, you know, it's a meme, but honestly, it's so profound.

Because what's the meaning of that slogan?

The meaning of that slogan... The meaning of that slogan... The meaning of that slogan is simple.

In all the variations of Marxism that have been translated into the Western world, every single one has taken the form of an ideology.

And even in the experience of the revolutionary tradition and history. It takes

the forms

in many ways

of an

ideology.

And then

therefore and

necessarily

there's

a discontinuity

between the

ideology and

the reality.

And in the Western mind and in Western literature

and according to Western sensibilities this is the truth this is George Orwell's

1984 which the Western sensibility finds so beautiful and compelling.

You know, with the movie, they made a movie in the 80s with a soundtrack.

It's drawing and peaceful line and bright.

But I need the

I'm on the

and then the

Anglo just sheds a tear because of how

the tragedy of this utopian ideology going wrong

oh the human

nature

and the whole narrative about communism contradicting human nature.

And it's just so profound. They find it so profound. Why? Because they're looking at one side of a cycle.

And they think, I got it. It's right there.

It's not directly the ideal.

It's also the ideal and the material.

Oh, wow.

That's so profound.

And they find this is like the quintessential aesthetic of communism in the West.

Even the so-called Marxists, that's why they trifle with Marxism.

That's why the woman go to Marxist's grave dressed like hookers and they disrespect and piss on it.

And they disrespect and, you know,

absolutely trifle with the symbolism and great figures from our revolutionary tradition because ultimately what they truly take seriously

and what they truly believe in

is exactly that tragedy

of the impurity, the ideal

and its dysfunctional

realization. But the

the copse, the disgusting Kufr Marxism that exists

in the West is saying something

different than the right wing George Orwellyn. It's saying, okay, when we realize the ideal of

Marxism, it's never going to be concordant with reality,

but we're just going to keep improving and it's okay. Bryce, what's up?

And so, Democratic socialism, gradual,

Zoran Mamdani and Kate Abu Ghazala, whatever.

And we'll just kind of inch at it and we'll keep trying.

That's their kind of gradualistic.

You know what it is?

It's a, it's some kind of gradualistic. It's a, you know what it is? It's a, it's some kind of mutation of Bernstein, the first Epstein, by the way,

because he, his name was Steen, Bernstein, right?

This kind of gradualistic interpretation of Marxism that says, okay, we're not

seriously Maoists, but China did improve literacy and healthcare, and so did Stalin in a way. And of course, yes, it was all bad, and we agree it was such a horrible experience but incrementally there are nice

good things and so therefore Marxism today it's a kind of incremental yeah we have the gay

rows of the democratic socialism it's like a little rose it's not like the scary authoritarian fanatical zealots who actually believe.

We're just kind of self-ironic about it.

We're going to go to Marx's grave, dressed like a hooker.

It's okay.

We're not serious.

So this is their aesthetic.

Now, there are some autistics still holding out who are autistics, though.

They're autistic.

They just idea, ideal, ideal, ideal.

And they're completely delusional about reality because they don't

understand that ideality captures one moment of a dialectical process and that to ultimately

achieve harmony with the material world, you have to go through the process

and us what is different about us i claim i claim the difference with us and allah cosmo she

jinging such a powerful phrase because we are...

That phrase is like the expression of a cosmic cycle.

Like, this is the process.

Allah, like the fundamental source of the belief.

Cosmos, the belief, cosmos,

the reality, when things settle in and become existence, right?

And then Xi Jinping,

the prince of the world.

Well, that's like Satan, right?

Well, the prince of the era, of the

auspicious conjunction, the one who in the world today beyond just belief see jishin ping is not a law you understand jizhen ping is the prince the holy so to speak, who fulfills the will of heaven and God on earth, right?

And he represents the leadership we have in the world, right?

As a real embodied, agential leadership with will at the level of will so if you think about it

this combination allah cosmos jiz Jinping it's like a it's this kind of harmonious cycle where it um addresses the various contradictions

that are inherent in any ideology any notion of a revolutionary process as an ideal this contradict contradicts that, right? Because the contradiction is directly given

expression in our acknowledgement that, yes, we know it's a cycle, but this is a cycle. If you capture

one moment of the cycle, an ideal, and say, this is God, of course you're

going to disappoint yourself. But if you acknowledge the cycle itself, no, it's not a Trinity.

Don't fucking, you know, it's like, it's like this is primitive times and we're creating a new religion and there's just like people automatically misinterpreting it.

Like literally chill the fuck out, okay?

I'm not talking about the Trinity.

I'm talking about a cycle.

Okay? It's a cycle. Okay?

It's a cycle.

And all the art you guys make of it,

besides a few exceptions,

you need to the pyramid one is not good.

You need to fucking calm down.

The point of that expression is it's a return to the oriental giving way to being, giving way to fate, giving way to being, or at least the Western stereotype of the Oriental worldview. It's like,

since the Greeks, the Western tradition ends on the tragical note, or an anticipatory

messianic note, which is, oh, the Messiah will come in the future and some point,

and in the meantime, we're just going to anticipate.

Like, we're going to anticipate it.

Or, it ended really badly in a tragedy, and we're going to cry about it.

The Oriental tradition is different.

The Oriental tradition acknowledges a kind of rhythm of being, right?

A resonance.

It's my favorite word, by the way.

And the devotion, the celebration, the kind of expression of this rhythm of being has been classified in the Western mind as pagan, has been classified as a kind of fatalistic, devoid of humanity,

devoid of individuality, devoid of will. But little do they know it includes the dimension

of will.

It includes that. Of course it does.

But the will is part of a... So it's...

It almost sounds pagan when you think about it, right?

It's like because we are re-contextualizing

and situating the reality of the will back into the nature,

back into cosmos, right?

And so there's this kind of harmony that we're trying to give expression to.

But I reject the notion that it's pagan because there's a moral center.

See, the point of paganism is it's devoid of a moral center.

There's always a moral relativism in pagan.

Oh, I'm going to worship. Paganism, by the way,

it's always a regression from an original monotheism. And it leads to a kind of moral relativism.

Oh, this God, I'll worship this God of rat fucking. I'll worship the God of piss drinking, I'll worship the god

of pooping, and then you

can just worship them and it's all the same

and it doesn't matter.

Of course we reject that, but

associated with paganism is a kind

of rhythm, rhythm of being, right?

A kind of cyclical understanding of time.

And rather than a messianic one, by the way, strictly speaking.

Of course, this itself is messionic,

but at a certain point, we have to acknowledge that the Messiah has come.

No.

And so I think there's something very beautiful about allah cosmos jizien ping we have the

confidence that heaven is with us that we don't have to pathologize the inadequacy of our ideals

with respect to their realization anymore we We understand the process. We understand

the formula. We understand the way of things. Do you understand? We understand the tau. We don't have to

be in this melodrama of

locked in the kind of Western logos of the tragedy

and the tragic or the comical, right?

They're the same thing.

I think that's very powerful.

I think, and I'm shitting on the West so much.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Well, I'm not

shitting on the West to assert

the East. The notion

of the Orient orient let me fucking drop a bomb on you the notion of the orient

is not only a western notion it's an american notion amer America is Tartaria.

America is the Orient.

Because the Orient itself, at any given point, at any given geography, is local.

So, for example, someone in India doesn't care for a notion of an Orient that unites him

with Turkey and unites him with the only thing that comprehensively unites the East

together into one Orient is a specific subjectivity. It's a specific gaze. Now, I say that gaze is the gaze

of Tartaria, right? This kind of Eurasian, the integral history of the Eurasian world conquerors ending in Tamerlane.

But that perspective now can only exist in America.

Because even in Eurasia itself, you have these brilliant, beautiful, sublime civilizations, the Russian, the Persian, you know, Indian, I guess there's richness there in some way.

Chinese, of course.

But each and every one has already made peace with the dialectic they had with the Mongol

universalism.

China doesn't want to be Mongol.

China is China.

Russia doesn't care to be Mongol. Russia is Russia. Iran doesn't care to be Mongol because Iran is Iran. The only place where this process of being reassimulated and reintegrated into these great universal sedentary empires,

the only space where it is possible to have the point of view of Genghis Khan or Tamerlane is in america today so america is tartaria the or the orient the orient

properly speaking as an abstraction doesn't exist in the Orient

it exists in America

and first it will be discovered

in America and then it will spread

to the world and that

will be world revolution

now this isn't a Trotskyist idea that,

oh, America is going to have the revolution

and then we're going to spread it by force.

It's more like we're going to have our own

kind of ideological revolution here,

and that will spread to the world because that relationship by the way

hasn't changed carl marks came from europe there's a reason for he came from europe so the process of the development of Logos as a philosophy is a Western trajectory of history.

Because in contrast to Islamic civilizations, in contrast to even chinese and so on and so on

only in the west did the development of logos as a philosophy correspond to a few things one raising this to the status of an exclusive political principle, corresponding to a history of political fragmentation.

B, applying into practice as a technique, as a technology, right, Regardless of established traditions, norms, conventions,

technology, properly speaking, is not simply the artificial instruments we have, man-made

artificial kind of creations that are means of production.

Technology specifically has a disruptive significance.

And for this reason, is a specifically kind of Western.

Because all the technology of the Orient, and this is such a broad brush I don't care cry about it

I can acknowledge

there are these

huge land empires

in the or yes

there's all these

statelets and

nuances I

it doesn't fucking matter

for purposes

of the argument

I'm trying to make

here there's a specific there's a reason the steam engine is made in England, okay?

For example.

And, uh, this has a disruptive significance.

Mostly the tendency of technology in the East, in Asia, Eurasia, is that it could be disruptive temporarily, and then it's reintegrated with the imperial bureaucracy and the status quo.

Or it's suppressed, which happened in the case of the ottoman empire with respect to the printing press

am i wrong about that twos if i'm wrong i'll be corrected if i am that could just be a conventionally held

myth but I

distinctly recall that being true

what a wonderful cult that no one will

contradict me

okay so um

so contradict me okay so um so there's a specific trajectory we call uh logos as philosophy is this the cause of the trajectory no it's just what we can measure by way of thought, right?

And we can measure it by way of thought. That's what gives it uniqueness, okay?

Like, this is strictly the development in exclusive

logos as the exclusive principle through philosophy through technology through the so-called

science and through the kind of political, discrete and exclusive political principle of contractual

relationships, for example, of bondage, rather than the kind of seamless given appeal to the

tradition and law we see in the East.

Feudalism was a contract, right?

There was no emperor who just fucking ran shit.

There was a discreet contractual relationship that comes from Roman law, that you can trace all the way back to the gai riks, right?

So, yes, there is an east-west distinction. That's very meaningful.

And it culminates in coming in the world itself. It's it's a kind of a geosophical

logic that

is like the shape of the earth

the west development culminates

in a new meeting point with the east

marks partook in this process, and America will be the final place.

We will build infrared ACP here, and then the world will be inspired by it, and then the world will

fulfill the revolution, befitting of its development

thus far.

So that's world revolution to me, you know, one aspect of it.

I talked to you last stream.

I gave a very good lecture about the gay reeks.

Was it last stream or the stream before?

Where I talked about why, what is this kind of tendency of usury, private property,

political fragmentation, and so on and so on. And I talked about my commentary on the hydraulic civilization, or not my

commentary, my interpretation of it, you know. Amilo, what's up? Specifically, the disruptive

technologies that enable political fragmentation.

Milo, what's up? Thank you so much.

Technologies which, by the Asiatic logic,

are then reintegrated into some kind of greater...

You see, the way Marx talks about the Indian communes and the Orient in general, specifically in the case of India, he has this idea that Asia falls asleep during history. And it's very fascinating how he talks about

the Indian communes.

For Marx,

it's not that there are

no changes that happen

in the communal form,

or sorry,

in the communal structure.

It's not that there's no

new technology or no new cult. It's that somehow it's no new technology or no new culture. It says somehow it's all

reintegrated into an underlying communal logic, logos, right? And this is kind of integral

logic. It just reabs it. The development of the division of labor is reintegrated back into an integral unity of labor, right?

One that is harmonious and kind of maintains the melodious development of the history.

It preserves and reproduces the resonance, original resonance

of the communal structure of production and society and civilization. So, that's, Marx is writing on the indian commune i recommend everybody read into it and and marks was a brilliant

thinker by the way ah well i mean of course he was but specifically on this point he brilliant. Because this is what led him to the view

that you don't need Western modernity per se. In Russia, he said that we can skip capitalism and go straight and we can we can have this kind of

primitive communist Russian obsina or the mere and we could just kind of go straight to communism from there.

And he was very...

Marx was not a...

A Philistine.

He tried to understand the best he could

with what he had.

So,

you know,

when we're talking, okay,

back to Allah Cosmo, Xi Jinping.

Guys, there's a reason

when I'm at the gym,

I'm listening to that shit.

Like, that shit is so motivating to me.

But, like, I'm not listening.

I'm not simply listening to some mindless chant that affirms a few beliefs that I'm a Muslim my

you know Cosmos sounds cool

Xi Jinping is great no it's like

the meaning of it to me is it's like

on the one hand

a slogan that you shout into the

heavens is supposed to be like

a sword you're cutting through the fabric of reality.

You're disrupting it. And you're asserting a new principle. And it's this kind of destructive

article of faith you use to raise and level the world. Quite based, right? But you think about it,

it's fundamentally Trotskyite. And if you just kind of cling to that and say, yes, for eternity,

you know those memes that you're seeing on X? I don't know if you're seeing them.

The Trotsky-Tukachevsky memes where Tukachevsky's paganism is like,

oh, Trotsky is so cool.

We're going to have an eternal revolution and conquest.

Anyway, no, what goes hard about Allah-Kazmos Xi Jinping is that it's a slogan, yes, a very loud, aggressive slogan, but one that ultimately evokes cosmic harmony, like alignments, cosmic alignment, like things settle back into place and we have discovered a new logos.

Ones of you could hear this.

Yeah, that's great.

That's fucking crazy.

I thought I solved this fucking issue.

I really thought I solved this fucking issue ones if we're good You know, Fives if we're good Fives if we're good.

Fives if we're good.

All right, guys,

some troubling news.

Super troubling news.

I'm not losing frames and my my internet is not at fault i'm not losing frames on my end from the internet so there is no this is a kick problem this is literally kick

um so tell me where i left This is literally kick.

So tell me where I left off.

Tell me where I left off.

Tell me where I left off. Holy shit.

Fuck.

Fuck.

Tukachevsky.

Oh, my fucking God.

Fuck.

I literally fucking thought I had this fucking issue fixed.

No, I wasn't talking about how slogans and chants were fucking shallow.

It's just...

Holy fuck.

I mean, what the fuck is wrong with this shit, man?

It's like, I thought I fucking fixed this shit, man. It's like I thought I fucking fix

this shit. Holy fucking

cortisol spike.

I don't know what the fuck

the Vod's going to look like

Oh man that's fucking great

Oh wow

We're at 113. Holy shit.

Literally everyone is gone.

Everyone fucking left.

Y'all are here. I get get it but it's like the show i don't know man i don't know if we can go on like this they just destroyed my stream i'll give it some time

But uh

They totally nuke to the stream

They fucking destroyed it

They fucking destroyed the entire stream

like they just

fucking ended it.

I have internet now.

The problem is they just fucking tanked my stream.

They just totally disrupted and fucked the stream up.

And what pisses me off and spikes my fucking cortisol is that to start these fucking streams, I have to talk about news to build it up.

Nobody gives a fuck about these lectures about the theory shit, right?

So it's like you lose the fucking audience.

I can't continue what I was talking about because if I fucking do that, we were not going to have a fucking audience. I can't continue what I was talking about

because if I fucking do that,

we were not going to have a fucking stream tonight.

So fuck.

Holy shit.

Fucking pisses me the fuck off.

It really pisses me the fuck off.

It's like I can't just continue. I can't just continue what I was saying

I straight up can't you know fuck it because it's gonna be like

And fuck

Fuck this is like the worst shit

I've just had so much

fucking bad luck recently, like I don't know

what the fuck is up fucking going on

I've had such bad fucking luck

fucking terrible fucking bad energy.

Holy shit.

Cooking too fucking hard.

All right.

I'm gonna continue what I was saying.

But,

yeah,

fucking retard NPCs who don't fucking like it

can just go fucking kill themselves.

I don't give a fuck.

Yo, Populus, what's up?

Okay, so let me continue what I was fucking saying.

All right, and then we'll have that debate.

All right, so what I was saying was that, um, look, usually a slogan.

I hope you guys remember the context of what this is about usually a slogan is supposed to have a

a violent effect strictly violent

strictly destructive just raising reality. Chairman Gonzalo, Chairman Gonzal, you're raging against the machine, you're raging against the world, you're putting something out there that is meant to have an effect that comes at the expense of reality in some kind of way.

That's the purpose of a slogan in the modern sense, you know, a revolutionary sounding slogan.

So you raise to the sky to the heavens, this destructive, raising kind of cut in the fabric of reality, right? And the idea

that romanticization of this sounds cool. Okay, this is the essence of the Trotsky-Tukachevsky meme you're seeing on X, where they're just

kind of like eternal permanent revolution under the pagan Tukachevsky, it's so dark and cool.

Ha, ha, ha. Yeah, this is this gay, you know, whatever nonsense.

But the really beautiful thing to me about the slogan,

Allah Cosmos Jiz Jinping, is that it's an aggressive slogan,

it's a loud slogan, it's a war slogan.

It has all the... B. You know, What ones of you can fucking hear me all right yeah it has all the intensity and violence of a revolutionary slogan.

But what I find more powerful about it is that it signifies an awareness of cosmic harmony. That ultimately, this revolutionary passion and zeal will be re will be kind of

uh it partakes in a cyclical kind of logic of existence Part of the cycle is absolutely the intense, absolutely violent, violent in the metaphysical sense for the FBI.

Kind of all the passion and power and disruption and violence of revolution is there but you're already kind of preempting in your acknowledgement that our revolution will end in its own socialism in one country our revolution will end in its own socialism in one country. Our revolution will end in its own reform and opening up.

What is in the Western mind considered a kind of tragical endpoint of the revolution, we acknowledge as part of the kind of dynastic cyclical logic of revolutionary change. And we regard this as a reflection of the cosmos, of reality at its most fundamental level. And that's the meaning

of Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

It's like, yes,

powerful, aggressive, militant,

of course. But we have a

confidence in faith that don't worry.

Everything will settle into

place and be restored as being part of the rhythm of being.

Rhythm of cosmos.

This is all part of the melody of the kind of cosmic hymn

and it will be okay. Everything will settle back

into its place where it belongs.

So not simply the kind of Jupiterian

grandeur, but also a kind of Saturnian resignation to fate,

resignation to the kind of stillness and eternity and calmness of being, which is the auspicious conjunction.

So that's the meaning of Allah Cosmos

Xi Jinping in many ways. It's a meme for sure. It's silly in many ways.

But also in some way, I fucking blast that shit at the gym.

If I'm blasting that shit at the gym, that shit's blasting in my fucking years at the gym.

That fucking means something.

Okay?

That's not simply some like random ass shit that's meaningless.

Absolutely.

That motivates me.

This is a, it's a profound source of motivation for me.

I'm not autistic.

I'm Uzbek.

I'm not autistic.

But when I say I'm not autistic, I'm not a kind of Talmudist autistic. I'm not somebody who fanatically becomes obsessed with a specific appearance and a specific form and clings to that and has this sense of attachment toward a form.

So for me, my revolutionary faith is not the faith in an ideal. I'm not like a Western Maoist

who has faith in some kind of ideal

and clings to it autistically, and it's

the idea, ideal, fuck reality, fuck

reality.

My revolutionary

faith also corresponds to

a kind of profound peace with being uh all the restlessness

and chaos and troublesomeness of the revolutionary process it it will be okay. Everything will work itself out.

Now, if you're familiar with me in the party, the ACP, you know, I'm a contradictory person, so maybe this is just one aspect of me, but I feel like when it comes to a lot of party problems that I am told about or faced with, I always have this optimism where I say, no, it will be a, no, sometimes I freak out for sure. I'm not claiming I don't freak out sometimes, especially in the beginning I used to a lot. But nowadays, I always have this kind of like, I mean, once if you're in the party and you can attest to this,

or maybe I'm just fucking, this is just my biased way of how I look at myself sometimes.

Because I kind of feel like when I'm confronted that there's an issue, there's a crisis, there's a problem.

Nowadays, I've always just kind of, no, no, it will be okay.

Everything will be fine.

That's kind of the vibe I feel like I'm on, but I could be biased in the sense that, like, I only remember my vibe this way because I am paranoid and maybe I think of it as a defect and I need to improve it but that I'm otherwise very much, you know,

freaking out about shit.

But I feel like I don't freak out about a lot of things anymore.

Um... In the beginning, for sure, I wasn't like that.

I'll say for sure in the beginning,

I would freak out and lose my shit over stuff.

But not now. And the reason I have this optimism is because it's a it's a kind of peace. It's like their religion of peace. But it's no, it's a peacefulness. It's a tranquility peace it's like their religion of peace but it's no it's a peacefulness it's a

tranquility it's like it's very uh darmic you know it's like no no listen everything will work out

don't worry it'll be all fine you have to be like Mao Zetong ultimately right

Mao Zetong he's there's this

Italian who's screaming about

nuclear war

I think that was

Tolgliotti who was

not so bad right

but uh in this context I guess he was.

Freaking, oh, nuclear war!

And Mao's like, no, it will be okay.

Okay, look, half the world is gone.

So what?

We'll build socialism.

And then he goes, but all of Italy will be gone.

He said, well, it's okay.

Does the success of socialism hinge upon the survival of this one country?

So this is the type of optimism I want you to have.

I don't want you to have naivity. I don't want you to have naivity.

I don't want you to have blindness and numbness where you don't have the intelligence to kind of see the intelligibles, perceive them.

I want you to be ultimately confident that everything will be resolved in a way that aligns with the will of heaven and the nature of cosmos.

And you'd think this is a very passive way of seeing things.

You'd think this is a very passive, like,

okay, I'm just going to sit around like a Buddhist monk

and just fucking sit on my ass and pray.

When I'm going hard as fuck at the gym,

pushing myself to my fucking limit,

I'm listening to Allah Cosmo,

She's Jinping.

Like, that gives me such a profound motivation to do

extraordinary things.

Like, yes, motherfucker, we can

fucking do it. And it'll be

fine. Don't fucking worry.

We can move the fucking mountains.

It's okay.

Heaven is with us.

Yes, motherfucker, we're going to be on that shit doing that shit.

That is the most powerful shit I have.

It's a source of unlimited confidence for me

unlimited confidence

that's what honestly that's what it is

unlimited confidence the cosmic

outlook I have cosmic

Marxism it's a source

of unlimited

confidence um source of unlimited confidence.

And I'm not telling, I'm not saying you should be, you should have undue confidence because

that's autism, devoid of social awareness and stuff and go embarrass yourself but like if you actually have the

confidence and you see the alignment between the vision you have and the nature of the cosmos

how it makes sense how the story makes, how there's a resonance there, right?

That is a true confidence.

It's an unlimited source of confidence if you can actually tap into that.

And you can fucking do anything and you'll never fucking worry about anything.

I don't worry about a fucking thing, ultimately.

I don't.

I've learned to just not worry about a fucking, I literally don't worry about anything.

Do I get frustrated absolutely you just fucking saw me

fucking chimp out over this fucking piece of shit mic

and this retarded fucking bandwidth problem

I just fucking had

but in the

long term

am I gonna

fucking be

tripping over

that having cortisol

spikes?

No.

In the short term

I'll be very

explosive.

I have a high

temper.

I'm a very

explosive person.

But in the long term, do I have anxiety?

Do I haven't?

Absolutely fucking not.

So if you're in the party and you're freaking out,

sometimes you're in the party freak out.

I've seen it.

I've seen rank and file just fucking get a lot of anxiety and freak the fuck out.

And it's like, this message is for you.

Chill the fuck out.

Everything's going to be good.

You know, I remember when I was living in isolation from the world because I shun the world.

I had this dream where, you know, I had a lot of revolutionary anxiety, and I was so upset that I just, we're doing Lenin wrong. We're failing him today, you know? And then I had this dream

where I was like,

I was in this living room, I was like a kid.

I was in this living room with these,

with this, I guess I was staying

with like a Chinese family.

And like, I was like, I think I would be like,

I was 10 years old and there was like a bunch of other Chinese kids.

There's like two or three of them.

Almost like they kind of gave me cousin vibes, honestly.

And I was just sitting there and they were like on their shelf.

They had like a shit ton of pirated

like Pokemon like everything

you would want as a kid they just had it

and it was like all pirated like

video games

Pokemon whatever

and I you know the vibe

was basically like they just got it from the factory.

They just took it.

Like, they don't have to fucking buy it.

It's like cheap, dirt cheap and like, whatever.

They just have all that shit.

Right?

But ultimately, you know, I was, they were just kind of showing me

and they were like yeah but ultimately it doesn't matter

kind of like yeah who cares about all this shit

and then we put it away

and then I remember we like sat on the couch

and then they kind of

they kind of spoke to me and they're like listen

don't worry we're Gucci everything's gonna be good

and then the fucking living room turned in turns out it's a fucking spaceship

fucking turned upwards like this

the entire room

the fucking thrusters started blasting

and we're fucking launching into space

like we're going to socialism

don't worry that's literally what was like

don't worry we're on the way to socialism.

Just chill. Everything's part of the plan. Just don't worry.

I had this dream. I think it was 2018, 2019. I had this dream. And it was only a few months after that dream that I finally acknowledge.

Not maybe a few,

maybe a few weeks.

That dream unironically inspired me to reevaluate everything I thought about China.

That dream.

Like they were just saying, I was a kid in the dream. They're like, listen, bro, just chill.

Is Gucci? We got it all locked down and figured out. We're on the way. Like, don't worry. We're

already on the way to don't worry we're already on the way

to socialism

that was fucking

that was a life-changing dream

I had

keep in mind I was living years in total isolation

before COVID

and I was living in isolation because total isolation before COVID.

And I was living in isolation because I... I was very like...

It was like a religious retreat. It was like, uh, uh, I was like, you, you kind of just can drop out and withdraw from this

retarded society and just actually think about what matters.

Yeah, I was in school, but I would have online classes and I wouldn't show up to class I would only show up for the tests

unironically you guys knows I would show up to class in tattered shirts I had t-shirts that were fucking ripped I would just wear that shit I wouldn't give a fuck. I literally didn't care.

I didn't even take care of my appearance at all.

I showered, I didn't smell bad, but I just did not give

a fuck. I literally shunned the world.

I would walk around with a fucking tattered shirt with like totally ripped up.

Wouldn't give a fuck.

And this wasn't law school.

This was undergrad.

This was not law school.

Law school was during the, uh, uh, lockdown.

I had a fucking giant, unkempt beard means to know what it means to know Marxism, truly, you know.

But like, how do you live being a Marxist in this world is like the question I was

struggling with like

what kind of fucking world do we live in and what does it actually mean to

commit myself to this specific lineage

and tradition.

Anyway, but that dream was very impactful.

So, it doesn't mean hold back

this is a problem with Western Buddhists

I wasn't in a frat

Western Buddhists

are just become lazy bumfucks

and they're just kind of pussies

they're just like I'm just going to cross my legs

and you need to have the sense and optimism

of a Buddhist and peacefulness,

inner peace of a Buddhist,

but the fanaticism and zeal

of an Abrahamic,

which is Islam when you think about it.

You need to like have, you need to push it to the fucking limit.

Don't think of, you don't have to worry, by the way, and preempt.

Oh, I already know what the limit's going to be.

We don't fucking know. All we know is that it's all going to work out. All we can be certain

of is that everything is going to work itself out. We have no fucking clue how that's going to happen.

We have no fucking clue how shit's going to work itself out. We just know it will.

We just know all this shit's going to work itself out.

Do we know how it will?

Absolutely fucking not.

We just know it will.

You know?

All right.

I have some people who want to debate.

There's a Russian guy named Pavel

who's been waiting, sleeping

all night. He's going to go first.

Pavel, what's up? I know you have this big theory you want to present to the stream.

If you just want to present a theory, I recommend you put it in writing,

and I will share it to the Discord. We'll look at it, and you'll have your time in the sun.

But if you genuinely want to debate, let's debate.

But I know we, I told you we could do this, but I, you know, I've been, I'm thinking about it.

And it's like, I don't know how much air time we have for you to just give a guest lecture as a professor.

So I don't mean to be insulting, but I just got to be real with you, bro.

Yeah, okay.

So first of all, it's not my theory.

There's this Dagestani guy called Shabhan Ma'amayev.

By the way the everything in the

In the

Any names or links you want

Just put them in the show requests

So we can all look at it

Yeah

All right

I'll put them um but yeah continue please

sorry cut me off guard hold up

let's just do it do it after you don't have to do right now just uh afterwards you know

yeah hold up i'll switch my one don't have to do right now, just afterwards, you know?

Yeah, I'll hold up.

I'll switch my Wi-Fi as well.

Okay, Pavel, I'm going to give you some time, and I don't know, are you staying up or you just woke up?

Oh.

Have you been staying up this entire time or you just woke up?

Yeah, I slept like three hours.

So it's okay.

It's okay.

I've had sleep.

I had coffee.

Listen to the stream.

I energized. It's okay, bro.

All right, okay, please continue.

No, no, why, right?

So, yeah, so this theory is that the money commodity is labor power. Why? Because, I mean, it's the only true, like, generic commodity that exists in the whole world, in the whole capitalist, imperialist world.

Gold is like a specific commodity and at a certain point of development.

Why would you... Labor powers the commodity. Is this globally or only nationally?

I'm saying globally it's the money commodity like i mean maybe in uh each country internally is the it's the money commodity

so not i don't know.

We need to, we need a way for this to be a functional theory, though, you know, because like, okay, so how does it explain dollar hegemony?

The dollar is a reserve. How does it explain that?

How does power valorize the U.S. dollar?

It's the trick question.

Well, it does that because Because

It replaced gold

So when the gold

When the gold's era ended

But how

How directly

I understand gold is basically saying how, how, okay, so for Mark's gold is a store of value.

Okay.

By the way, this theory you have could be interesting.

But for Mark's, gold was a store of value and therefore became the commodity that simply's only use value is that its exchange value. Now, you're saying that has become labor power. Now labor power according to Marx is the not the realized concrete labor, but it's kind of like the price of labor, the price of a potential, basically.

Labor powers of potentiality, more or less, right?

And that is on the market.

It's going rate, so to speak, would be like determined by the labor market. Now, what is the fundamental quantum of labor power as a value? How is it measured? And, like, what discrete commodity

we can say is labor value? What's the baseline?

Yeah, well, you have to

differentiate, right? Like there's this

generic notion of labor power Like there's this generic

notion of labor power

and there's this specific

like there's very specific

labor powers.

I mean

because like a programmer

or a builder

they're going to have different qualities of labor powers.

Okay, but there has to be a single quantum that we can use as a reference point.

So what's the quantum?

Yes, so...

What is the general form of labor power? The quantity needs to be divisible, right? What is the general form of labor power?

What is the general form of labor power?

What's the general form of labor power?

Well, there's no abstract general labor power that exists like...

There's only...

Yeah, I know. There's only different types.

So that's the problem I would have with the theory right off the bat.

How can we measure... See, I would be interested in...

I tried to explore this kind of idea that interest rates might be a proxy for a general form of labor power.

I tried to study this idea in 2017, 2018.

But it was too complicated for me.

But what would be the general interest rates are centralized there's only the central bank interest rates are like

you know um

they have a kind of quality of being singular

they're set from above there's only one

national interest rate so to speak by the central bank and that could maybe be a reliable proxy

for the general form of labor, right?

But because it measures in some sense the continuous activity within society.

But it turned out to be too complicated.

But what would be the equivalent of that in this case? Because if there isn't one,

then the theory is bunk, so to speak.

Okay, I need to specify what do you mean by, because I can just say like, yeah, there there is the unit of measuring the labor power is commodity is time.

Of course, you buy segmented time chunks of labor power.

But now there's labor power.

So for marks and angles, there's the general form. So for marks and Engels, there's the general

form of labor is basically

the unskilled labor,

right? The most simple

base form of

you go out of high school

or something, you just a fucking job

and it doesn't require any skillfulness. With out of high school or something, you get just a fucking job, and

it doesn't require any skillfulness

with specialty.

The more you have specialization

within the division of labor, via

skillfulness, this is just

kind of compounding

a pre-given quantum of labor, you know, intensifying it or vice or the reverse or something.

But there's a baseline where we could say, okay, this is just a plain,

general form of labor.

And these skilled forms of labor are just kind of taking this and maybe multiplying it or,

you know, compounding it, so to speak, so that it is on the market more valuable.

But ultimately, there's, it's a simple kind of labor, right? So what is the equivalent of that in this case?

No, well, it's the same, it's the same simple kind of labor.

It's the same.

But if this theory doesn't try to wrestle with that question

concretely and say, okay, for example, maybe this is blue collar labor maybe this is

this industry or this specific sector of the market the labor market or something i mean like i

can't we can't work with this man i'm sorry there's this if you can maybe you could link it and we can learn more but so

far i just don't think this is going to go anywhere um yeah all right so like there's an intensity a

an average intensity in the whole industry of labor, right?

There's a minimum set of skills that changes with, as production changes,

a minimum set of skills required from any labor power.

So, I mean, the baseline can be like really unskilled labor and...

Okay, I don't... I'm not interested in what it can be for this theory to have functional

significance for me i i can't work with metaphysics that simply says this is what maybe would make

sense where can we actually analyze even at a

mathematical level how we could put this

to use in our understanding of how the

economy works because gold has

a store of value we can do something with that

gold measures

labor power or measures

labor value I should say because of the labor that goes into the mining and so on excavation of gold, or it's at least a proxy for how much that would be.

So, okay, now you're saying labor power has replaced gold that just baffles me i don't even know what

that could possibly mean i mean i kind of understand okay so the basis of money is just directly

labor value but how does labor value come to be priced and measured based on

what you're you're talking about some statistics like some uh concrete data you're talking about that

I'm no I'm not appealing to the authority of statistics

or asking for that authority

I'm asking what makes this theory better than anything else

okay because you know what is it called the, uh,

corn theory of value? You guys know about that? Where there was this kind of counterfeit,

or there's kind of, uh, counterproposal by mycans or libertarians. Like, well, what,

corn can be a measure of value

rather than labor. Why not corn?

Oh, okay, okay.

So this has a concrete benefit

because it allows us to understand socialism

better. And also

like what Nikitin did to socialism better. And also,

like, what Nikitin did to inductively understand

the, he

came to the conclusion inductively.

So with the fact that, look,

gold is no more

associated with the dollar

than what it is. Well,

committed an analysis and found

that, well, the money commodity

it has to be constantly

exchanged on the internal market,

right? Because,

I mean, the pieces of paper themselves, they have no value. So you have to buy the money commodity to get it in your hands, then to use it up or to sell it again.

So it has to be circulating.

And the most actively circulating since the 70s,

and we know the 70s is when the bread and wood system completely collapsed.

Well, since then, the most, the most actively traded commodity, the most, the commodity that

had the most contact with fiat currency is labor power.

It's the, is the fund, is the salary funds in all the advanced countries.

We see that in all the advanced countries.

The salary fund is different from wages, though.

We're not talking about traditional labor power anymore we're talking about something else and then also how do we take into account

401k's how do we take into account 401Ks? How do we take into account welfare from the government?

How do we?

So I don't find this theory very convincing.

I just think it's like, okay, we are still using fiat currency to, we're still using currency.

It's still being used

as a measure of value

for people to buy and sell things

and sell their labor

and so on and so on.

But does that mean that because

I mean,

you could just find any commodity,

you can find oil for energy, you could find water any commodity. You can find oil for energy.

You could find water because it's very ubiquitous.

And say, this is the secret thing.

It's like, I just, I don't, the rational premises don't add up to me.

And that's my problem.

Let's try that another way

through socialism, through the fact that

imperialism, as Lenin pointed

out, it's slowly creeping

towards socialism itself.

Okay.

Okay, so we know that in socialism, it's a transitionary period. There's a bourgeois right, and there's a fundamental exchange.

There's a fundamental exchange. There's a fundamental exchange.

Labor vouchers, they're not money, right?

What makes labor vouchers not money?

Why is it that I can't, like, give my labor vouchers some guy and buy something that he made and not directly by from our semi state our worker state because they because they

don't circulate right so labor vouchers they're just representative they're just representing the fact that i i gave a few

hours of work to you're pavel i'm familiar with what labor vouchers are and i'm familiar with the

reasoning behind them i'm familiar with Marx's reasoning.

You need to appreciate that I have the knowledge about this. I've spent the majority of my life

when there was the first hair that came onto my lips

my life has been devoted to understanding this

please do not repeat it

only give me the things that are new please just tell me the

the new ideas in theory you have

okay so this is Just tell me the new ideas in theory you have.

Okay, so this is basically a simple exchange.

You are exchanging your labor power. Okay, you know what, Pavel?

I'm sorry.

You, you're, my patience, my patience has reached this limit.

I'm sorry.

Because you're saying,

okay,

this is,

I know what simple exchange,

I told you not to fucking tread any fucking familiar ground and just directly give me this new fucking theory.

Directly give me the new fucking theory.

I don't have the patience.

I have Arab patience, which is very thin.

I have explosive temper and low patience.

All right.

I'm sorry, but like I literally, it's very difficult for me to keep up with that.

Because there's the substance is just, we're not getting at the substance.

All right.

Give me the thing that's new.

Give me the part of this theory that's, don't retread.

Okay, because this and that and it's like

I can't I can't I mean I put it this way I know the fundamentals of Marxism.

If I didn't arrive on the basis inductively of those same fundamentals that you did, focus on why we disagree.

Because I know the fundamentals.

Now you're saying, well, it's as simple as just putting the pieces together.

I just find that a little insulting.

I've spent a lot of my life trying to put those pieces together.

I know what it means to try and put the pieces together.

So I've done this.

I've attempted it.

Tell me why your way is better.

I don't know.

I just find,

I don't like the... Okay, look,

maybe the original Economist who came up with this

has an interesting idea of some kind.

And maybe this...

Maybe it adds up to the complexities of finance.

How does this square with, for example, the derivative?

The commodity that we call a derivative.

How does this square with the dynamic nature of interest rates?

And, you know, how does it square with the fact that the Fiat economies don't actually have, don't tend toward even balance sheets, but yield kind of unlimited debt, right?

And it's like, I don't find it sophisticated to just be like, oh, instead of gold, we move to labor power.

Abstractly, that sounds nice.

How do we put that theory to work in a functional way?

In a way that we can

concretely analyze. I just feel like this is

metaphysical Marxism, where we're just kind of

through induction alone,

arriving at a conclusion, dogmatically,

and then

it's free.

It doesn't add anything to our analysis.

It doesn't give us more insight about the world.

It's just kind of is something we can impose on the world from the top and, you know, hope that it maintains consistency.

Deriv is just a scam.

Okay.

You know, that's kind of not true.

Derivatives are pretty complicated mathematically, first of all.

And there's a lot of different types of derivatives, right?

And, you know, there's Suhal Malik's ontology of finance,

Ultimate Sued article, but it's like, he's got a point.

You know, this is, there's something

a little very sophisticated about this.

You can't just outright dismiss it as a scam. There's something a little very sophisticated about this. You can't just outright dismiss it as a scam.

There's something about this that taps into a very complex or, I don't know how I'd put it,

uh, more intelligent dimension of being, if you will, right?

In the sense like there's these potentialities, we can make potentiality and intelligible,

potentiality itself, and measure things at this fucking level is pretty

advanced actually right

um

the fact think about forex markets the fact that the exchange rate between currencies has itself

become a derivative a a commodity, right?

You know who else cared about derivatives was Karl Marx?

If there's anything to derivatives, it's risk.

Totally agree.

Yeah, but risk is part of it's something there is something

ontological about that when you think about it

you know we need to

yeah absolutely we have a lot of fucking work to do

I don't like easy shortcuts I just don't

you know the court of the con is open and we got to of fucking work to do. I don't like easy shortcuts. I just don't.

You know, the court of the con is open, and we got all sorts of people with ideas.

I open the court, but sometimes I'm just not having it.

Okay, no, I know you want it to go. Okay, no, you don't, you believe Hitler wasn't an anarchist, right?

That's what you want to debate about?

You have 15 seconds to unmute your mic.

Yeah, so can you hear me?

Yeah. to unmute your mic yeah so can you hear me yeah yeah so i agree with most of you i watched the first video that you, that Hitler was an anarchist that you made. And I have to say that I agree with most of your criticisms of anarchism, but I disagree with the reasoning behind them and I also kind of disagree on some points, right?

Don't care, just get right to it.

Get right to the meat and potatoes or what you want to say

and what your

argument is

yeah so

my argument is

first of all

I would say

things that I

agree with you

no I don't give a shit I don't give a shit.

I don't give a shit.

Tell me what you disagree about.

Well, all right.

So your argument,

one of your arguments was that

this was the first time in the video, actually,

that anarchists

are just

fascists are just anarchists

but they have

reign over state, right?

Yep.

Yeah, so I don't disagree with that, actually.

I believe that...

Get the fuck out of here, bro.

You're done.

You have one more chance to articulate an argument.

That's a disagreement.

Otherwise, you're fucking banned from the server, all right?

You have one more chance.

No retreading ground.

No saying, my argument is, no, just fucking get right into it.

All right?

Go ahead.

All right, dude.

Uh... Go ahead. All right, dude. I have to... I mean, English is not my first language, dude, you have to understand.

I have to get to it slowly

anarchism is people are attracted to anarchism for various reasons all right and people are attracted to anarchism for various reasons, all right? And people are attracted to different ideologies for various reasons.

Now the reasons that they are attracted to anarchism and later on they do something which is authoritarian,

that does not disprove that anarchism is authoritarian, the same way that it does not disprove that anarchism is authoritarian.

The same way that it does not disprove if some person is attracted to Marxism and its components,

but he does not behave in line with Marxist philosophy and he does something weird and strange,

then it doesn't mean that Marxism is to blame for it, right?

Okay, so what's an example of anarchists affecting their will into reality in some way that was non-authoritarian?

Has there ever been an example of that ever?

Because I can give you examples of Marxists affecting their will into reality in ways

that align and correspond to the method and theory of Marxism.

But I cannot say that there is a single example of anarchists affecting their

will into reality in a way that is non-authoritarian in a collective and organized capacity.

So give me a single...

Gandhi was an anarchist.

Who?

Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi.

The Indian... Mahatma Gandhi?

Yeah.

Mahatma Gandhi, the Hitlerite,

the pederast, Gandhi?

Well, he was a pedo but yeah I didn't even know he was a peto

I just guessed so

where what so it wasn't an authoritarian

where he was raping children

Gandhi the

the literal Nazi Gandhi?

The guy who fucking upheld the caste system?

You're saying this is an example of a virtuous, consistent anarchist?

He literally defended and upheld the caste system.

How can you say this is an anarchy?

You just

nuked yourself. No, listen.

No, listen. First of all,

the caste system

is not completely what you think

it is, alright, because I'm an Indian as well.

So I kind of know something about it.

The caste system is, okay, just something about it. The caste system is

okay, just to be clear, the caste system

is compatible with anarchist principles?

It is, it is

compatible with collectivist anarchism, yes.

Continue, please. it is it is compatible with collectivist anarchism yes continue please continue

so first

so the first thing is anarchy

caste system

it needs not be

decided from birth all right it does not need to from birth, all right?

It does not need to be that if you're a son of X, then you have to be X or if you're

son of Y, you have to be Y.

So the thing about caste system is it has different interpretations inside of Hinduism.

And what Gandhi is the thing was, Gandhi believed that every village should be its own unit, which it behaved as.

So inside every village there were farmers, there were artisans, there were different types of people who maintain the society inside of the village. It was completely, it could remain completely inert from the rest of the society and still be functioning. So Gandhi, yeah, and this this system inside of this system different people were organized with different occupations and this was the caste system the occupation that they have been assigned was their caste was there Werner you can say in Hindi

so Gandhi appell this Gandhi was not of the belief that we need to discriminate amongst the

caste which is the real problem is the discrimination not assigning different people different

what about the Dalits?

What about the untouchables?

Yeah, he met with the untouchables and he ate with them.

He was not of the belief that...

Yeah.

Oh my God

Did he shake

He didn't shake their hand

Did he?

Because that would blow my mind

Did he shake their hand?

Why do you think that he would be so opposed to it?

Did he breathe the same air as them? God forbid?

What's your point here? So just make your argument.

Do you understand how incredibly fucking primitive it is for me to hear that you're

extolling as somehow an example

that Gandhi recognized the

inherent dignity, God-given

dignity of man

that

Yeah, oh no, no, he didn't

see dalits

is lesser

because he ate

with them

okay

he also

that's not what I meant

though

no but it's just

it came off

so ridiculous

he ate with

yeah okay

that doesn't

fucking mean. I apologize

him that. Yeah.

That doesn't mean that anything

he ate with them. Okay. There's an

existing system, the caste system,

which in India

Yeah. Yeah, corresponds to

an incredible level of social discrimination. Corresponds to an

incredible level of sectarianism, hierarchy, a sense of subjugation, a sense of subjecting some people to a lack of dignity.

I mean, everyday dynamics that you think about,

like, you know, a woman from this cast

can't marry a man from that cast.

A man, they won't associate. Oh, Gandhi's

so enlightened because he's some fucking enlightened

individual. How is he addressing

the social phenomena

of different casts treating each other differently?

Oh, he's wagging his finger.

No, the institution of the caste system, fundamentally, fundamentally, right, is beneath the inherent God-given dignity of a human

being. And you're saying

this is compatible with anarchism.

I rest my argument. When I say

anarchism is fascist, you make the case for me.

No,

listen, man, I just

can't... You have to

engage in some good faith kind of a discussion.

I'm absolutely here in good faith. Your

apology for the caste system.

I'm not buying. I'm not apologizing for the

caste system. I'm just saying that... It's compatible with collectivistic anarchist principles.

First of all, no, it's not.

Yeah.

If the discrimination and the statification of the caste system is removed, then yes, it is compatible.

The anarchism does not recognize...

Ayrgyz. Yes, it does not recognize... ...division of labor. It does not recognize irisks

of labor. Does not recognize a fixed division of labor.

It does not recognize a fixed division of labor

in anarchism because it doesn't

recognize a coordinated division of

labor because the coordination of a

division of labor depends upon authority.

Anarchism rejects authority. If anarchism rejects authority, it rejects the entire principle of a division of labor.

No, actually, well, it does not...

Does anarchism reject authority? Yes or no?

It rejects hierarchy, not authority. Both are different. Reject authority? Yes or no?

It rejects hierarchy, not authority. Both are different.

Anarchism didn't make as its slogan the rejection of authority, really?

Why did Frederick Engels write on authority then authority then well if you go to a doctor

and you

go for a brain surgery

would you not respect his authority

would you stand up and say well

i don't respect your body on the subject of biology

anarchists are fucking retarded.

That's why I'm not. No,

anarchists does not say that.

If you read any kind of an Anarchist book,

it

it doesn't

it does not say that

you can't take

you can't understand the authority of other people take you can't understand the

authority of other people or you can't

understand the authority of let's say the

religious. Frederick Engels's book on authority, right?

Yeah, I guess.

So, I mean

that's the wonderful thing about a phrase

like anarchism it just mean whatever the fuck we want it to

we just don't know

bad people in power that I'm an anarchist I just don't like when No, no. Actually not. I'm an anarchist.

I just don't like when bad people are power.

I'm okay with power.

I'm okay with all this stuff.

I just don't like when it's bad, unchill people.

I just like chill people.

Hey, I'm an anarchist.

I just like chill people.

That's my ideology.

That's not the ideology. No. I just like chill people. That's my ideology. No, that's not the ideology.

I just like chill people. I just don't

like unchill people. I like chill people.

Well, if you're going to repeat

that, then do, but

let me make my point. If you're going

to just repeat your strong man again and again.

Go ahead.

Yeah. So anarchism does not say that you cannot respect the authority of other people. It is for authority. It says that you can go to a barber for getting a haircut. You can go to a doctor. You have to respect the authority of these people on specific matters. The thing in here is as soon as the doctor is done with your surgery, you do not have to do anything with him.

The doctor cannot force you to sit down and the doctor can't kidnap you.

And also this authority that you have recognized within the doctor that is within your life.

Hey, hey, I'm an anarchist. I believe doctors shouldn't be able to kidnap you after a surgery.

So you can't argue with that, honestly. You just really can't argue with that, you just really can't argue with that

can you

yeah we just don't think doctors should be able to kidnap

you okay hold on let me ask you a question

so you're an anarchist right

and I'm your doctor

yeah I perform surgery on you and then I kidnap

you and lock you in a cage

because I have a fucking shotgun pointed out your head

what are you going to fucking do about it?

Nothing. What if

you are a communist and somebody

does the same thing?

I'll fucking fight to the end, whatever I

can. I'll fight because I'll fight. I will also do that. I'll fucking fight to the end whatever I can I'll fight

I'll fight because I'll fight

I'll fucking

I'll fucking get my army

to fuck them up

put them in chains

I will do that too

no you

that requires law

that requires a fucking armed force.

That requires somebody enforcing

fucking rules.

That requires people walking around with guns

who can fucking enforce shit.

Yeah, anarchists can do that.

Okay, was Joseph Stalin an anarchist?

Why wasn't Stalin?

What about Stalin violated anarchist principles then?

Because it was an hierarchy. He was at the top. He was enforcing rules.

No, so what? So I just said you have to enforce rules If you don't want someone to kidnap you

Who's gonna fucking enforce the rule?

Yeah

You can enforce the rule

Through the law of the community

The community can

Itself enforce the rule

The communities can volunteer

Communities require coordination

Communities require a centralization Communities require a centralization

Of communications So communities require coordination. Communities require a centralization of communications.

Multitudes actually know how to coordinate

and organize with each other. The idea

that every single part of a multitude

is going to simultaneously share

telepathically the same fucking mind and coordinate

in unison in a way that reflects the will of every single person independently is a fucking

retarded fairy tale and moreover the idea that the time exists on earth

for the opinion of every single person

to be checked,

do you consent, do you consent,

do you consent, so that every single person

simultaneously unites their will

and acquiesces to the will of the collective

by making sure that it

corresponds to that of the individual, there's

not enough time on fucking earth for that to be

possible. You're talking about a

form of organization where it's among us

emergency meetings forever.

So don't give me this shit about the community.

The community is not an individual agent. It's not a subject. It's not an agent. It has no directly measurable will of its own. The only thing that can measure the will of a community is an organized

authority and the only

way an authority can articulate

itself is through leaders.

Leaders that have voices, that have

faces, that have skin in the game

and are fucking accountable. This is

what all revolutionaries in history

had to fucking learn the hard way.

This notion that a fucking horizontal

community, a bunch of fucking people

wearing dresses and sandals,

sitting criss-cross, sitting next to each other,

fucking doing drum,

Congo fucking hippie drums with fucking

dreads and shit. The idea that this

fucking exists and can do anything whatsoever

and in any way affect any kind of

fucking will is a fucking nonsense

retarded idea for children.

Well, whatever

you

whatever makes you sleep better,

I guess.

What country do you live in?

India.

Okay, this is why India

is backwood backwards right now.

Because you have people like you running around thinking that this is, you can just, oh, I'm an anarchist.

I could just sit around in a circle banging drums.

Well, the problem that you have is you're thinking that I...

The only one who gives voice to the community is the father of the people, Stalin, Xi Jinping.

There's no fucking community we can speak about it besides he who has insight.

Lenin. Lenin Lenin

Lenin

spoke the word

of the community

Stalin

Mao

Xi Jinping

the community by itself the community My! Xi Jinping.

The community by itself, the community by itself is agonizing Lavinia from Shakespeare,

raped, suffering with blood, spilling out of her mouth or with devoid of a word only he who recognizes the community gives word to the community is the dispenser of

justice on earth, the shadow of God

on earth. That was Lenin,

that's Stalin, that's Mao,

that's Xi Jinping. These are

men with faces or women

with authority, accountability,

with skin in the game,

who say, this is this type of fucking business I stand on,

measure whether I fucking do or not, bitch.

There's nothing that bypasses that.

Nothing.

This notion of a horizontal community exercising its will, fucking retarded copium lies.

It's ridiculous, yes.

Give you reasoning of light is ridiculous.

And you give you reasoning.

But, okay, then I'm going to answer that.

Yes, you are right.

As in the community on itself cannot have a prebiscite on every single fucking thing

to agree on. So it needs a leader.

It cannot ask everybody.

No,

that people will be

incentivized to act in this way because

there goes... Needs a leader.

There's every

fucking group on

Earth has a leader.

Give me a single

fucking group on planet

earth that doesn't have a

fucking leader.

Just one.

Because there's always one motherfucker who the buck has to stop with

where if shit goes wrong,

somebody's got to fucking eat shit for it.

Right?

It's always one fucking person that people fucking count on.

That this guy fucking knows it.

Now, whether, now there's some leaders that are chiller and fucking more submerged and more willing to listen and more receptive.

And there's some leaders that are fucking assholes.

But at the end of the day every fucking collective every group on earth

has a leader

give me one

exception

well that

always will be a leader

even in anarchist

yeah go on

give me one example

of a collective

formation devoid of a leader.

Thank you.