ISR*EL LOSING | IRAN INVASION | NO KINGS

Kid CCP with the five.

What the fuck is up, bro?

Australia Stanny, what's up man?

What's up with the ten, bro?

I see you.

What's going on?

Uh what the f

Alright, first of all, my Iraqi beard is growing in, so I just wanted to update you about that.

The second thing is that my prediction about the Iran ground invasion didn't come through.

I'm notoriously bad at predictions when it comes to precise timing.

And then I literally yelled at Jackson today over text.

I'm like, Jackson, you made me look so stupid in front of everyone.

Regio, what's up?

But, you know, look.

Here's why I have an excuse.

Because two days ago, Trump randomly delayed it by 10 days.

Okay.

Trump is fucking gaming the markets.

He's super unpredictable.

It's all for inside trading.

Don't crucify me if I can't get the dates exactly lined up and correct.

But I'm not going to be like Scott Ritter and just pretend I didn't get that shit wrong.

I got it fucking wrong.

All right.

Going forward, I want to reiterate: if I ever say it's happening next week, two weeks, when it comes to some shit that's outside of our control, just keep in mind that that can change and that it's not always airtight 100%.

And, you know.

And by the way, if you don't know what I'm talking about, the prediction was that there was going to be an invasion of Balochistan region in Iran, just slightly inside the Gulf of Oman, passing through, this weekend, specifically Saturday.

Did not happen.

I'll say that did not happen.

I got it wrong.

But two days ago, Trump randomly did a switcheroo and said he's going to delay it by 10 days.

However, that's not the end of the story, okay?

I'll also give myself a little bit of credit while we're doing that and talk about how, well, look, I was correct about the fact that 3,500, I named 3,500 U.S.

troops have officially arrived in the Middle East as of today as they're preparing for a ground invasion against Iran.

Yeah, hey guys, good morning.

After four weeks of war in the Middle East, the conflict grinds on.

Reports indicate the United States is preparing for a possible weeks-long ground operation in Iran that would include thousands of U.S.

service members.

Antimatter, what's up?

I just want to show this to y'all, just so you know, I'm not Scott Ritter.

I don't just lie.

You know, I'm not just a liar.

Over the weekend, the USS Tripoli, manned with 3,500 troops, including 2,500 Marines, arrived in the SENTCOM area of operation.

If an operation is ordered to seize Iranian oil facilities or enrich uranium, it's expected that both special forces and conventional forces would be used.

This comes as the United States and Israel launched a series of strikes against Iranian military infrastructure over the weekend, including hitting Iran's nuclear development facilities.

In Operation Rising Lion, we hit very hard the entire chain of nuclear production in Iran.

We hit everything from the production capabilities and the factories, all the components, to the centrifuges and so on.

The entire production chain was hit.

It was affected.

It was delayed, but it was not completely destroyed.

With the Israelis looking east, they're also looking north where early Saturday an IDF soldier from Connecticut was killed in southern Lebanon by a Hezbollah rocket.

His name was Moshe Katz and he was 22 years old.

Is it Israeli was killed?

Oh wow.

Oh wow.

What a treat.

Uh okay, so yes, the eleventh.

Marine Expeditionary Unit has in fact arrived in the Middle East.

And this is being reported on by the New York Post, who I want to say is a disgusting website, hideous, disgusting, unforgivable website full of fucking ads everywhere.

But I managed to get rid of the ads kind of and and so this is readable.

Three warships from San Diego.

Didn't I tell you they're coming from San Diego?

More than 2,000 Marines heading to the Middle East.

It's an amphibious assault ship with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit.

I'm pretty sure I mentioned them.

They were en route, I'm pretty sure they already arrived.

And the USS Boxer is carrying the eleventh unit as far as amphibious.

Amphibious Ready Group

So these groups, you know, this is fi for a land invasion, all right?

Look, it's for a land invasion.

It's got infantry, artillery, combat engineers, vehicles, and aircraft, okay?

Uh it's the most versatile, flexible, lethal, or global response force the United States has to offer.

So they're gonna go to Balochistan, try to create pitch a tent, create a base, and mount a very long ground invasion of Iran.

That's what it that's what things are looking like.

Keep in mind that can change.

Keep in mind, Trump's is on his menstrual cycle.

He's very unpredictable.

His insider trading menstrual cycle, which just has him going back and forth, you know.

Here and there, and zero to one hundred, and back and forth over and over again.

But so far, it looks like they're taking steps and they're making preparations for a ground invasion.

Now, the ground invasion I thought was going to happen this weekend, but two days ago, Friday, when the market closed, Trump said he's going to delay it by five days.

I want to ask a simple question.

Is there a single gorilla, is there a single member of the ACP who is on the stock market and just making money off of this shit?

For all the talent and intelligence that we have put together as a community, you would think that's you are.

Sambu, can you okay?

You don't have to donate to the stream, but if you're a party member, are you throwing that shit in the party's coffers?

Because what the fuck?

Like, y'all need to be on that stock.

Actually, I'm not telling you, I'm not going to tell you to do that because you're going to gamble your money away.

And only if you know what you're doing.

Don't take this as an order, all right?

I would just think there's some weird nerd who knows what they're doing and understands how all this shit works.

I sure as hell don't, right?

Mostly been losing money.

Wow.

Okay, so I'm just saying we need some like autists.

Yeah, we need the autists for real.

I'm going to be talking about autism today, by the way, in relation to the cosmic markets.

I'm going to have a very interesting stream.

But yeah, that's a very.

That's some news that you should keep your eye on.

But Trump is once again gaming the stock market for the insider trading buddies.

And here I am slamming.

I am truly a man of the people.

I'm truly a man of the people.

You wanna know why I'm a man of the people?

You wanna know why I'm a man of the people?

Maybe that's a bad thing.

If I was a cynic

Jackson and I, if we were not even grifters, but just Machiavellian Alexander Kojev types.

We would have forked the mega communism thing.

into like basically publicly selling out.

Which wasn't there in the original intention, but because of how retarded the public interpreted what mega communism was, we very much had the opportunity to do that.

We could have easily forked it, twisted the meaning of it, in such a way that would have given us access to whatever channels of information there are for Trump's inner circle.

Fuck, I mean Jackson easily could have made it into Trump's inner circle.

And we could have made tens, hundreds of millions, billions of dollars from insider trading and then use that to fund the party.

But you know why we couldn't do that?

Because had we done such an awful thing to the public eye, selling out.

It would have killed your spirits, my gorillas.

It would have killed your morale.

It would have broken your heart.

Such a long game.

Your heart couldn't afford such a long game.

The hearts of the masses could not afford such a long game.

Is it would it have been rational though?

I think about it.

I think about it.

Would it have been rational to just get that fucking money, pump it into a Communist Party?

And I think

Perhaps if there was someone else who could deliver this message?

That would have been the thing Jackson and I should have done.

But there's no one else who can deliver the message.

Am I wrong?

If I am the person who has to deliver the message,

Um

the best way that I can.

If I'm the one who has to rally your spirits and compel your morale in the direction of having the motivation to dedicate yourself to this cause,

I could not have played 4G Chess and just gotten the fucking money and, you know, come back.

You would never have seen, you would never see me the same.

Even though what I behind the scenes it would have been for a greater cause.

Y your motivation, my gorillas, your motivation is so precious and sensitive.

I speak as a cult leader.

Do I do I not Your motivation is so precious.

Such a thin line separates it.

From total collapse, so to speak.

So much incentives, there's so much pressure, there's so m I mean, we are at war with the fucking world.

You know, we uh we just declared war on Uganda.

We just declared war on uh the Ugandan military.

But we're at war with the world, okay?

And all that we have is faith.

All that we have is faith.

That's it.

That's all we have, faith.

So this faith.

is more precious to me than all the hundreds and billions of dollars in the world, hundreds of millions and billions of dollars in the world.

And let me tell you something, my gorillas.

Let me tell you something.

I believe

That the path we took, which is the clean path, which is a path devoid of selling out and grifting,

That was worth more.

That's Bitcoin in 2001, before it was even fucking invented.

You understand?

This faith, this morale, this motivation that you have when you wake up in the fucking morning and you look at the sun and you see Mao Sedong's face, when you're walking through life in this way, where you can look at the fucking world around you and witness its development as it submerges into its opposing and contrary premises.

In this revolutionary cycle that we live within?

To see the world with infrared vision, fucking priceless.

Fucking priceless.

That's fucking rare.

Yeah.

It was absolutely, absolutely the correct move.

So many people are cynics.

Oh Haas, play it smart, play it smart.

I'm not gonna play it smart.

At a certain point the buck has to stop somewhere.

Where there's no calculation, there's no strategy, there's no

Manipulativeness, there's no deceit, there's a direct

Faithfulness and devotion to an article of faith you raise to the status of a banner that can animate.

A core of militants, right?

Willing

To spark the fucking fire.

That's gonna burn this bitch down.

You understand?

So

Just to be clear, when we're talking about the insider trading regime, which is what it is, everyone close to Trump in that inner circle is getting fucking filthy rich because of what Trump is doing.

He's telling them and they're fucking getting filthy rich off of it.

We could have had a piece of that money, okay?

But we didn't.

Why?

Because the message was more important.

And uh but you know what, I'll still kick myself for it.

I'll still beat beat myself up for it, but what can you do?

The message was more precious, it was more important.

And uh th this is why.

This is absolutely why.

It's not simply about abstract moral principles.

I don't believe in abstract categorical imperatives that exist in the fucking sky.

I don't believe in abstract principles that you fart into a jar and call sacred.

Which is what the entire sphere of so-called ethics really just consists in, farting in a jar and calling this sacroscent.

But I believe in the effectivity of

Communication.

I believe in the message.

I believe in the message undiluted.

I believe in being able to communicate to people something new.

something that inspires them with the possibility, a belief.

impossibility, right?

I believe really in what what already is unfolding right in front of our fucking eyes, right?

And it's so there all the the the the the pressure doesn't exist.

To adopt some other comprehensive worldview or ideology.

The pressure exists to succumb to nihilism and cynicism and demoralization.

That's where the that's the what you're fighting, the jihad you're waging.

Oh my god, a shrell standing.

Holy fuck, bro.

Thank you.

The 25, appreciate you, bro.

Appreciate you, brother.

The jihad that you're waging is not a jihad simply against some other world view or ideology or something.

The jihad you're waging is against the forces of demoralization.

You're waging a jihad on who but the kufar.

Really, that's what they are.

They're Kufar.

Trotskyites, Kufar.

Leftcoms, Kufar.

Maoists, Kufar.

Democratic Socialist Kofar.

Euro-communist Kufar.

Revisionist Kofar.

Uh Marxist but not Leninist.

Kufar.

Humanist, Marxist, Lukaks, fa kufar.

They're all kufar.

They're every single one of them are kufar.

Gerald with the five.

They're all, each and every one of them, kufr.

They're all kafr who deny.

The simple, the simplicity of the revolutionary message, the simplicity of the synthesis discovered and achieved first by Lenin, then by Stalin and Mao.

And so on.

They don't believe.

They lack belief.

Marxism without belief.

That's what you call Marxism today in the West.

The Kufr.

Marxism of Kufr.

And the Kofrotrotskyites at the No Kings rally, by the way, they're there waving red flags and making a big s spectacle of a tradition they had no fucking part in building historically.

Red flags whose only aura and power comes from the fact that they are today and have been in the past been the banner.

Under which the world's largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.

Was kept.

That's where the power and the meaning actually comes from, you fucking Trotskyite rats and mice.

Comes from the mighty Soviet Union and all of the countries that it inspired.

The People's Republic of China.

This was a real thing that happened in history.

Some of these kufr, that's what they are, I'm going to keep calling them, they're kufr.

Some of these kufr, they reproach me, they say, Haz, you simply appeal to power and authority.

Isn't this like appealing to the power of the Pharaoh?

I say no.

No, you filthy, disgusting kuffa rat, how dare you even speak to me?

But if I have to indulge if I have to indulge

The reason we point to the authority, to the power, to the greatness of China, the Soviet Union, even Russia today, the DPRK, isn't because we blindly worship force.

It's because that they had built what they did from scratch proves that they were able to achieve something.

They were able to achieve not simply a Marxism of the asshurt Trotsky with his glasses, upset that nobody appreciates how smart he thinks he is.

They achieved a relationship between the theory, the comprehensive and integral worldview that we call Marxism-Leninism or communism, and the masses.

The masses of tens, hundreds of millions of ordinary people in their nations who they mobilized and organized into a mighty state machine.

Do you know how fucking difficult that is?

Unifying entire nations, building an entire fucking empire.

Which ultimately, by the way, ultimately.

Was suspended in air from one source, held together by one thing, only one thing, faith.

Which is exactly why, in the USSR, the minute they succumbed to demoralization and revisionism, the whole thing fucking blew apart at the seams.

That was an empire of faith.

And even today's China is an empire of faith.

It's a faith that has.

Mm.

It has submerged into the unconscious for certain, for certain.

But go to the People's Republic of China today, go to the monuments to Mao Sedong, go to the things that actually serve as reminders of the humble origins of that state, the People's Republic of China.

And you'll see something.

The sacred.

People treated there as sacred.

Nobody, nobody will trifle with these things.

Nobody will trifle at the Museum of the C P C.

Nobody will trifle at the pilgrimages, at the holy sites.

The holy sites of Mau and his Sahaba.

The People's Liberation Army.

As a Shia, it's funny I'm saying that, but in any case, that's what it was, by the way.

It was nothing else but that.

Uh Volk has a precisely wonderful point.

It's precisely these disgusting, degenerate

Kaffir liberals who trifle at the grave of Karl Marx.

You see that one woman dressed like a hooker, dressed like a whore, attending Karl Marx's grave, defiling it, mocking it?

Sick, disgusting things because the disgusting United Kingdom allows people to commit this kind of sacrilege, this blasphemy.

In China this wouldn't be allowed.

In Russia this wouldn't be allowed.

In Russia you're not alle Are you kidding?

You to visit Lenin's mausoleum, you can't even have your hands in your pocket.

Okay?

But they trifle with it because it's not why?

Because it's not sacred to them.

Because they say it openly, by the way, these disgusting Trotskyite Kufr, they say it openly.

They say.

Well, it's not a religion, it's a science.

No, fuck you, it is a religion.

Literally, fuck you, it is a religion.

It's more than a religion.

By the way, more than a religion.

What does religion even mean?

Why is Islam sacred?

You think Islam is sacred?

Because some Saudi piece of shit sake.

Who looks like a deformed monkey?

Is wave wagging his fucking finger.

No, Islam is sacred because there's a story behind Islam.

There's a story behind Islam that people intuitively recognize and acknowledge as sacred, right?

The story of a man who came from nothing in the desert and had nothing but a message of unity and justice in the middle of nowhere against overwhelming odds, toppled entire empires just with that message.

That's the whole point of religion.

What do you think religion is?

You think religion is here because of some uh finger waving pederast, waving their finger at us, telling us what the rules are because so-and-so said so?

No, it's because of the story.

It's the story that gets people, because that story has the structure of what?

Logos.

You understand?

That's exactly what it is.

That story embodies and incarnates.

The entire cosmic cycle that we intuitively recognize as reflecting purely and authentically the most fundamental reality.

That there is.

The thing that animates everything in existence.

Everything in existence is suspended in motion within precisely this cycle.

The dialectical process, right?

Why are we so compelled to hear the story of beginning from nothing, from humble beginnings, from literally from scratch, you are nothing, you are nobody, you have nothing.

But just because you have this message, you topple empires.

Why does that resonate with us?

Because there's something about it that's true.

There's something about it that reflects something back onto us that we're putting out by virtue of our very existence.

And we have the ability to recognize it because we understand the truth that it communicates.

And the truth that it communicates is that the word.

Is more fundamental than all the incarnated wealth in the world.

All the gold and wealth and

Might and the great works and the Tower of Babel, you fucking name it.

That's an after-effect.

Because isn't it just obvious that before human beings can do great things, they need a fucking reason to wake up in the morning?

I mean, isn't that just common sense?

Okay, we can do, we can build great pyramids, we can do great things.

Of course, we can.

We can build great weapons and great armies, great militaries full of hundreds of thousands of people.

But why is it so easy for the army of Genghis Khan, vastly outnumbered by these conventional militaries, to prevail?

Why?

Because the thing that comes first is the shit that compels us to wake up in the morning.

The shit that inspires us with the bravery and the courage to run into a line of gunfire and risk our life knowing that it's in service to something more fundamental and precious than life itself.

That's what wins wars.

Not the thing.

You could have all the technology and every you could have the most complex and advanced division of labor in the entire world.

You could have all the technology in the world.

It ultimately doesn't matter.

The IRGC personnel.

who will inevitably confront and face Our boys

Their armor, their shield, their defense, they wear it on themselves, it's the article of faith they have.

They raise to the status of an article of faith, that their cause is just and that ours is wicked.

And you know why they're going to win?

Because they're fucking right.

This is exactly why Benjamin Netanyahu was wrong.

Benjamin Netanyahu tried to say that.

What did he say?

Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan.

He was confused about Genghis Khan because he's a retard.

But his idea was that, well, you know, mora being good and moral has no material significance.

You see, this is theolo perhaps this is theologically a problem with Judaism.

Maybe.

I can't speak for the more esoteric, advanced forms of religious study within Judaism.

Maybe Netanyahu's just a caricature of what a Jew thinks, according to.

The Western Christian tradition.

But nonetheless this notion that just because the moral is not immediately selfsame and identical with the material, that that means it doesn't exist at all.

is exactly the problem I have with

Zionism as an ideology when you think about it.

Just because the moral isn't immediately self same on the s at the level of form and appearance with the material, doesn't mean there's no relationship between them.

Doesn't mean that they're not ultimately one thing and unified and share one reality.

It's just that there's an indirectness with respect to how they come

to be united, right?

And uh this is very important to understand.

You know, uh there's many stories in i Islam or Christianity.

They share a story called The Cave, right?

People were persecuted in some city or some town.

And God told them, you know what?

Just go sleep in this cave for, I don't know, a hundred years or something.

I d I don't know how long it was, I don't know the details.

They went and they found a cave and they just went to sleep, and then twenty or a hundred years, whatever passed.

They came out, they went to the town, and everyone had adopted their beliefs.

Not only were they no longer persecuted, everyone came around and realized they were right.

Now, what's the lesson here?

The lesson is.

That's the most like obvious direct

simplified way of explaining how

Being morally correct, there is a discontinuity with the material world in some sense, where you don't understand immediately.

You know, how that squares with what exists.

But eventually, eventually, you will be shown how exactly the word is in harmony with matter, with what exists materially.

Right?

And that's the point of the story, by the way.

This is the point of the story of the the cave, you know.

Fuck, I'm like a preacher now.

But uh we have a slogan ourselves.

And what is it?

Allah cosmos Xi Jinping.

And you know it's a meme, but honestly, it's so profound.

Because what's the meaning of that slogan?

The meaning of that slogan.

The meaning of that slogan is simple.

In all the variations of Marxism that have been translated into the Western world, every single one has taken the form of an ideology.

And in even in the experience of the revolutionary tradition and history, it takes the forms in many ways of an ideology.

And then therefore and necessarily

There's a discontinuity between the ideology and the reality.

And in the Western mind and in Western literature and according to Western sensibilities, this is the truth.

This is George Orwell's 1984, which the Western sensibility finds so beautiful and compelling.

You know, with the a movie they made a movie in the eighties with the soundtrack.

It's drawing and peace for my

Fucking fire on a hole.

And then the Anglo just sheds a tear 'cause of how beaut oh, the tragedy of this utopian ideology going wrong.

Oh, the human nature just like and the whole narrative about communism contradicting human nature and it's just so profound, they find it so profound.

Why?

Because they're looking at one side of a cycle and they think, I got it, it's right there.

It's not it's it's not directly the ideal, it's also the ideal and the material.

Oh, wow, that's so profound.

And uh they they find this is like the quintessential aesthetic of communism in the West.

Even the so-called Marxists that's why they trifle with Marxism.

That's why the women go to Marx's grave dressed like hookers and they disrespect and piss on it.

And they disrespect and and and uh you know.

Absolutely trifle with the symbolism and

Great figures from our revolutionary tradition, because ultimately what they truly take seriously and what they truly believe in.

is exactly that tragedy of the impurity, the ideal and its dysfunctional realization.

But that you know, the the cope, the disgusting Kufr Marxism that exists in the West

Is saying something different than the right-wing George Orwell.

It's saying, okay, when we realize the ideal of Marxism.

It's never going to be concordant with reality, but we're just going to keep improving and it's okay.

Bryce, what's up?

And so, Democratic Socialism, gradual Zoran Mamdani and Kate Abu Ghazala, whatever.

And we'll just kind of inch at it and we'll keep trying.

That's their kind of gradualistic.

It's a, you know what it is?

It's a.

It's some kind of mutation of Bernstein, of the first Epstein, by the way, because his name was Steen Bernstein, right?

This kind of gradualistic interpretation of Marxism that says, okay, we're not seriously Maoists, but China did improve literacy and healthcare, and so did Stalin in a way.

And of course, yes, it was all bad, and we agree it was such a horrible experience.

But incrementally, there are nice good things.

And so, therefore, Marxism today, it's a kind of incremental.

Yeah, we have the gay rose of the democratic socialism.

It's like a little rose.

It's not like the scary, authoritarian, fanatical zealots who actually believe we're just kind of self-ironic about it.

We're going to go to Marx's grave dressed like a hooker.

It's okay.

We're not serious.

So, this is their aesthetic.

Now there are some autistics still holding out.

Who are autistics though?

They're autistics.

They just idea, ideal, ideal, ideal.

And they're completely delusional about reality because they don't understand that ideality.

captures one moment of a dialectical process, and that to ultimately achieve harmony with the material world, you have to go through the process.

And us, what is different about us, I claim.

I claim the difference with us and Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

Such a powerful phrase because we are that phrase is in it's like the expression

Of a cosmic cycle.

Like, this is the process.

Allah, like the fundamental source of the belief, cosmos, the reality, when things settle in and become existence, right?

And then Xi Jinping, the prince of the world.

Well, that's like Satan, right?

Well, the prince of the era, of the auspicious conjunction, right?

The one who, in the world today, beyond just belief, see, Xi Jinping is not Allah.

You understand?

Xi Jinping is the prince, the holy prince, so to speak, who fulfills the will of heaven and God on earth, right?

And he represents the leadership we have in the world, right?

As a real embodied agential leadership with will at the level of will.

So if you think about it, this combination, Allah Cosmos, Xi Jinping, it's like a kind of harmonious cycle where it addresses the various contradictions that are inherent in any ideality, any notion of a revolutionary process as an ideal.

This contradicts that, right?

Because the contradiction is directly given expression in our acknowledgement that yes, we know it's a cycle, but this is a cycle.

If you capture one moment of the cycle, an ideal, and say this is God, of course you're going to disappoint yourself.

But if you acknowledge the cycle itself, no, it's not a Trinity, don't fucking.

You know, it's like this is primitive times and we're creating a new religion, and there's just like people automatically misinterpreting it.

Like, literally, chill the fuck out, okay?

I'm not talking about the Trinity, I'm talking about a cycle, okay?

It's a cycle.

And all the art you guys make of it, besides a few exceptions, you need to the ch the pyramid one is not good.

You need to fucking calm down.

The point of that expression is it's it's a return

To the Oriental giving way to being, giving way to fate, giving way to being, or at least the Western stereotype of the Oriental worldview.

It's like

Since the Greeks, the Western tradition ends on the tragical note, or an anticipate anticipatory messianic note, which is, oh, the Messiah will come in the future at some point, and in the meantime, we're just going to anticipate.

Like, we're going to anticipate it.

Or, oh, it ended really badly in a tragedy, and we're going to cry about it.

The Oriental tradition is different.

The Oriental tradition acknowledges a kind of rhythm of being, right?

A resonance.

It's my favorite word, by the way.

And the devotion, the celebration, the kind of expression of this rhythm of being has been classified in the Western mind as pagan, has been classified as a kind of.

Fatalistic, devoid of humanity, devoid of individuality, devoid of will, but little do they know it includes the dimension of will.

It includes that, of course it does.

But the will is part of uh so it's it almost sounds pagan when you think about it, right?

It's like because we are recontextualizing and situating the reality of the will back into the nature, back into cosmos, right?

And so there's this kind of harmony that we're trying to give expression to, but

I re I I reject the notion that it's pagan because

Uh there's a moral center.

See, the thing with paganism, the point of paganism is it's devoid of a moral center.

There's always a moral relativism in paganism.

Oh, I'm gonna worship paganism, by the way, it's always a regression from an original monotheism.

And it leads to a kind of moral relativism.

Oh, this god, I'll worship this god of rat fucking, I'll worship the god of piss drinking, I'll worship the god of pooping, and then you can just worship them, and it's all the same, and it doesn't matter.

Of course, we reject that.

But associated with paganism is a kind of rhythm, rhythm of being, right?

A kind of cyclical understanding of time.

And rather than a messianic one, by the way, strictly speaking.

Of course, this itself is messianic.

But at a certain point, we have to acknowledge that the Messiah has come.

No.

And so I think there's something very beautiful about Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

We have the confidence that Heaven is with us.

That we don't have to pathologize the inadequacy of our ideals with respect to their realization anymore.

We understand the process, we understand the formula, we understand the way of things.

Do you understand?

We understand the Tao.

We don't have to be in this melodrama of locked in the kind of Western logos of the tragedy and the tragic or the comical, right?

They're the same thing.

Um, I think that's very powerful.

I think, and I'm shitting on the West so much, uh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Well,

I'm not shitting on the West to assert the East.

The notion of the Orient.

Let me fucking drop a bomb on you.

The notion of the Orient.

Is not only a Western notion, it's an American notion.

America is Tartaria.

America is the Orient.

Because the Orient itself at any given point, at any given geography, is local.

So, for example, someone in India doesn't care for a notion of an Orient that unites him with Turkey and unites him with the only thing that comprehensively unites the East together into one Orient is a specific subjectivity, it's a specific gaze.

Now, I say that gaze is the gaze of Tartaria, right?

This kind of Eurasian.

The integral history of the Eurasian World Conquerors, ending in Tamerlane.

But that perspective now can only exist in America.

Because even in Eurasia itself

You have these brilliant, beautiful, sublime civilizations, the Russian, the Persian, um, mm, you know, uh um Indian, I guess there's richness there in some way.

Uh Chinese, of course,

But each and every one has already made peace with the dialectic they had with the Mongol universalism.

China doesn't want to be Mongol, China is China.

Russia doesn't care to be Mongol, Russia is Russia.

Iran doesn't care to be Mongol because Iran is Iran.

The only place where

These this process of um

being reassimilated and reintegrated into these great universal sedentary empires, the only space where it is possible to have the point of view of Genghis Khan or Tamerlane is in America.

Today.

So America is Tartaria.

The Ori the Orient, properly speaking.

as an abstraction, doesn't exist in the Orient.

It exists in America.

And first it will be discovered in America, and then it will spread to the world.

And that will be world revolution.

Now this isn't a Trotskyist idea that oh America is going to have the revolution and then we're going to spread it by force.

It's more like we're going to have our own kind of ideological revolution here.

And that will spread to the world.

Because that relationship, by the way, hasn't changed.

Karl Marx came from Europe.

There's a reason for that he came from Europe.

So

The process of uh the development of Logos as a philosophy is a Western trajectory of history.

Because in contrast to Islamic civilizations, in contrast to even Chinese and so on and so on, only in the West did the development of Logos as a philosophy correspond to a few things.

One, raising this to the status of an exclusive political principle, corresponding to a a history of political fragmentation.

B, applying into practice as a technique, as a technology, right?

Regardless of established traditions, norms, conventions, technology, properly speaking, is not simply the artificial instruments we have, man-made artificial kinds of creations that are means of production.

Technology specifically has a disruptive significance, and for this reason, is specifically kind of Western.

Because all the technology of the Orient, so to speak, and this is such a broad brush, I don't care, cry about it.

I can acknowledge there are these huge land empires in the Ori.

Yes, there's all these statelets and nuances.

I it doesn't fucking matter.

For purposes of the argument I'm trying to make here, there's a specific, there's a reason the steam engine is made in England, okay?

For example,

And uh this has a disruptive significance.

Mostly the tendency of technology in the East, in Asia, Eurasia, is that it could be disruptive temporarily and then it's reintegrated with the imperial bureaucracy and the status quo.

Or it's suppressed, which happened in the case of the Ottoman Empire with respect to the printing press.

Am I wrong about that?

Two's if I'm wrong.

I'll be corrected if I am.

That could just be a conventionally held myth.

But I r distinctly recall that being true.

Um, what a wonderful cult that no one will contradict me.

Okay, so, um

So

There's a specific trajectory we call

Logos as philosophy.

Is this the cause of the trajectory?

No.

It's just what we can measure by way of thought, right?

And uh

We can measure it by way of thought.

That's what gives it uniqueness, okay?

Uh, like this is strictly the development, an exclusive logo says the exclusive principle through philosophy, through technology, through the so-called science, and through the kind of political, a discrete and exclusive political principle of contractual relationships, for example, of bondage, rather than the kind of seamless given appeal to the tradition and law we see in the East.

Feudalism was a contract, right?

There was no emperor who just fucking ran shit.

There was a discrete contractual relationship that comes from Roman law that you can trace all the way back to the Gariks, right?

So yes, there yes, there is an East-West distinction, that's very meaningful.

And uh it culminates in coming in the w in in the world itself.

It's a it's a kind of uh geosophical logic that is like the shape of the earth.

The West development culminates in a new meeting point with the East.

Marx partook in this process, and America will be the final place.

And we will build infrared ACP here, and then the world will be inspired by it, and then the world will

and fulfil the revolution befitting of its development thus far.

So that's world revolution to me, you know?

Uh or one aspect of it.

I talked to you last stream.

I gave a very good lecture about the gay Reeks.

Was it last stream or the stream before?

Where I talked about why, what is this kind of tendency of usury, private property, political fragmentation, and so on and so on.

And I talked about my commentary on the hydraulic civilization.

Or not my commentary, my interpretation of it, you know.

Emilo, what's up?

specifically the disruptive technologies that enable political fragmentation.

Milo, what's up?

Thank you so much.

Technologies which by the Asiatic logic are then reintegrated into some kind of uh greater

You see, the way Marx talks about the Indian communes and the Orient in general, Indi specifically in the case of India.

He has this idea that Asia falls asleep during history.

And it's very fascinating how he talks about the Indian communes.

For Marx, it's not that there are no changes that happen in the communal form, or sorry, in the communal structure.

It's not that there's no new technology or no new culture.

It's that somehow it's all reintegrated into an underlying communal logic, logos, right?

And this is kind of integral logic, it just reabsorbs it.

The development of the division of labor is reintegrated back into an integral unity of labor, right?

One that is harmonious and uh kind of maintains the melodious development of the history.

It it it um preserves and reproduces the resonance.

Original resonance of the communal structure of uh production and society and civilization.

So that's Marx's writing on the Indian Commune.

I recommend everybody read into it.

And Marx was a brilliant thinker, by the way.

Ah, well, I mean, of course he was.

But specifically on this point, he was brilliant.

Because this is what led him to the view that.

You don't need Western modernity per se.

Uh in Russia he said that we can skip capitalism.

And go straight and we can pr we can have this kind of primitive communist Russian Obshina or the Mir.

And we could just kind of go straight to communism from there.

And he was very Marx was not a Philistine.

He tried to understand the best he could.

With what he had.

So, you know, when we're talking, okay, back to Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

Guys, there's a reason when I'm at the gym.

I'm listening to that shit.

Like, that shit is so motivating to me.

But, like, I'm not listening.

I'm not simply listening to some mindless chant that affirms a few beliefs that I, oh, I'm a Muslim.

I, you know, Cosmos sounds cool.

Xi Jinping is great.

No, it's like the meaning of it to me is it's like,

On the one hand, a slogan that you shout into the heavens is supposed to be like a sword.

You're cutting through the fabric of reality, you're disrupting it, and you're asserting a new principle.

And it's this kind of destructive article of faith you use to raise and level the world.

Quite based, right?

But you think about it, it's fundamentally Trotskyite.

Uh, and if you just kind of cling to that and say, Yes, for eternity, we're you know, those memes that you're seeing on X.

I don't know if you're seeing them, the Trotsky-Tukhachevsky memes, where Tukhachevsky's paganism is like, Oh, Trotsky's so cool, we're gonna have an eternal revolution and conquest.

Anyway, um, no, what goes hard about Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping is that it's a slogan, yes, a very loud, aggressive slogan, but one that ultimately evokes cosmic harmony, like alignment, cosmic alignment.

Things settle back into place and we have discovered a new logos.

Ones if you could hear this.

Yeah, that's great.

That's fucking crazy.

I thought I solved this fucking issue.

I really thought I solved this fucking issue.

Ones if we're good.

Uh fives if we're good.

Fives if we're good.

Alright guys, uh some troubling news.

I

Super troubling news, uh I'm not losing frames.

And my internet is not at fault.

I'm not losing frames on my end from the internet.

So there is no, this is a kick problem.

This is literally kick.

Um

So tell me where I left off.

Tell me where I left off.

Tell me where I left off, holy shit, fuck.

Tukhachevsky?

Oh my fucking god.

I literally fucking thought I had this fucking issue fixed.

No, I wasn't talking about how slogans and chants were fucking shallow.

It's just Holy fuck, I mean what the fuck is wrong with this shit, man?

It's like I thought I'd fucking fix this shit.

Holy fucking cortisol spike.

I don't know what the fuck the VOD's gonna look like.

Oh man, that's fucking great.

Oh wow, we're at 113.

Holy shit, every literally everyone is gone.

Everyone fucking left.

Y'all are here, I get it, but it's like the show.

I don't know, man.

I don't know if we can go on like this.

They just destroyed my stream.

I'll give it some time.

But uh they totally nuked the stream.

They fucking destroyed it.

They fucking destroyed the entire stream.

Like, they just fucking ended it.

I have internet now, the problem is they just fucking tanked my stream.

They just totally disrupted and fucked the stream up.

And what pisses me off and spikes my fucking cortisol is that to start these fucking streams, I have to talk about news to build it up.

Nobody gives a fuck about these lectures, about the theory shit, right?

So it's like you lose the fucking audience.

I can't continue what I was talking about because if I fucking do that, we were not going to have a fucking stream tonight.

So fuck.

Holy shit.

Fucking pisses me the fuck off.

It really pisses me the fuck off.

It's like, I can't just continue.

I can't just continue what I was saying.

I straight up can't, you know?

Fuck it.

Because it's going to be like.

Man, fuck.

Fuck, this is like the worst shit.

I've just had so much fucking bad luck recently.

Like, I don't know what the fuck is up fucking going on.

I've had such bad fucking luck.

Fucking terrible, fucking bad energy.

Holy shit.

Um cooking too fucking hard.

Alright, I'm gonna con I'm gonna continue what I was saying.

But uh yeah, fucking retard NPCs who don't fucking like it can just go fucking kill themselves.

I don't give a fuck.

Yo, populace, what's up?

Okay, so let me continue what I was fucking saying.

All right, and then we'll have that debate.

Alright, so what I was saying was that um

Look.

Usually a slogan

I hope you guys remember the context of what this is about.

Usually a slogan is supposed to have a violent effect, strictly violent, strictly destructive, just raising reality.

Chairman Gonzalo, Chairman Gonzalo!

You're raging against the machine, you're raging against the world, you're putting something out there that is meant to have an effect that comes at the expense of reality in some kind of way.

That's the purpose of a slogan in the modern sense.

You know, a revolutionary sounding slogan.

So you raise to the sky, to the heavens, this destructive, raising kind of cut in the fabric of reality, right?

And the idea that romanticization of this sounds cool.

Okay, this is the essence of the Trotsky-Tukhachevsky meme you're seeing on X, where they're just kind of like eternal permanent revolution under the pagan Tukhachevsky.

It's so dark and cool.

Ha ha ha.

Yeah, this is this gay, you know, whatever nonsense.

But the really beautiful thing to me about the slogan, Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping, is that it's an aggressive slogan, it's a loud slogan, it's a war slogan.

It has all the information.

Wa ones if you can fucking hear me.

All right.

Yeah, it has all the intensity and violence of a revolutionary slogan.

Um but what I find more powerful about it is that it signifies an awareness of cosmic harmony.

That ultimately this this revolutionary passion and zeal will be re will be kind of uh it partakes in a cyclical kind of logic of existence.

Part of the cycle is absolutely the intense, absolutely violent, revel violent in a metaphysical sense for the FBI, kind of um

All the passion and power and disruption and violence of revolution is there.

But you're already kind of preempting in your acknowledgement that our revolution will end in its own socialism in one country.

Our revolution will end in its own reform and opening up.

What is in the Western mind considered a kind of tragical end point of the revolution, we acknowledge as part of the kind of dynastic cyclical logic of revolutionary change.

And we regard this as a reflection of the cosmos, of reality at its most fundamental level.

And that's the meaning of Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping.

It's like, yes, powerful, aggressive, militant, of course.

But we have a confidence and faith that don't worry, everything will settle into place and be restored as being part of the rhythm of being.

Rhythm of Cosmos.

This is all part of the melody of the kind of.

Cosmic hymn, and it will be okay.

Everything will settle back into into its place where it belongs.

So, not simply the kind of Jupiterian.

uh grandeur, but also a kind of Saturnian resignation to fate, resignation to uh the kind of um

Stillness and eternity and calmness of being.

Which is the auspicious conjunction.

So

Uh that's the meaning of Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping in many ways.

It's a meme for sure.

It's silly in s many ways, but also in some way that I fucking blast that shit at the gym.

If I'm blasting that shit at the gym, that shit's blasting in my fucking ears at the gym.

That fucking means something.

Okay, that's not simply some like random ass shit that's meaningless.

It absolutely motivates me.

It's a profound source of motivation for me.

I'm not autistic.

I'm Uzbek.

I'm not autistic.

But when I say I'm not autistic, I'm not a kind of Talmudist Autistic.

I'm not somebody who.

fanatically becomes obsessed with a specific appearance and a specific form and clings to that and and has this sense of attachment toward a form.

So for me, my revolutionary faith is not the faith in an ideal.

I'm not like a Western Maoist who has faith in some kind of ideal and clings to it autistically, and it's the idea, ideal, fuck reality, fuck reality.

My revolutionary faith also corresponds to a kind of profound peace.

With B8.

Uh all the restlessness and chaos and

Troublesomeness of the revolutionary process, it will be okay.

Everything will work itself out.

Now, if you're familiar with me and the party, ACP.

You know, I'm a contradictory person, so maybe this is just one aspect of me, but I feel like when it comes to a lot of party problems that I am told about or faced with, I always have this optimism where I say, no, it will be, no, sometimes I freak out for sure.

I'm not claiming I don't freak out sometimes, especially in the beginning, I used to a lot.

But nowadays, I always have this kind of like, I mean, once if you're in the party and you can attest to this, or maybe I'm just fucking, this is just my biased way of how I look at myself sometimes.

Because I kind of feel like when I'm confronted that there's an issue, there's a crisis, there's a problem.

Nowadays, I've always just kind of, no, no, it will be okay.

Everything will be fine.

Um, that's kind of the vibe I feel like I'm on.

But I could be biased in the sense that, like, I only remember my uh vibe this way because I uh am paranoid and maybe I think of it as a defect and I need to improve it, but that I'm otherwise very much, you know.

Freaking out about shit.

But I feel like I don't freak out about a lot of things anymore.

Um

In the beginning for sure I wasn't like that.

I'll say for sure in the beginning I would freak out and lose my shit over stuff.

But uh not now.

And the reason I have this optimism.

Is because it's a it's a kind of peace.

It's like the religion of peace.

But it's no, it's a peacefulness.

It's a tranquility.

It's like it's very uh dharmic.

You know, it's like, no, no, listen, everything will work out.

Don't worry.

It will be all fine.

You have to be like Mao Seitong ultimately, right?

Mao Setong, he's there's this Italian who's screaming about nuclear war.

I think that was Togl Togliadi, who was not so bad, right?

But uh in in this context, I guess he was freaking oh, nuclear war and Mao's like, No, it will be okay.

Okay, look, half the world is gone.

Uh, so what?

We'll we'll build socialism.

And then he goes, But all of Italy will be gone He said well it's okay.

Does the success of socialism hinge upon the survival of this one country?

So this is the type of optimism I want you to have.

I don't want you to have naivety.

I don't want you to have blindness and numbness where you don't you don't have the intelligi intelligence to kind of see the intelligibles.

Perceive them, I want you to be ultimately confident that everything will be resolved in a way that aligns with the will of heaven and the nature of the cosmos and.

You'd think this is a very passive way of seeing things.

You'd think this is a very passive, like, okay, I'm just gonna sit around like a Buddhist monk and just fucking sit on my ass and pray.

When I'm going hard as fuck at the gym, pushing myself to my fucking limit, I'm listening to Allah Cosmo Xi Jinping.

Like, that gives me such a profound motivation to do extraordinary things.

Like, yes, motherfucker, we can fucking do it and it'll be fine.

Don't fucking worry.

We can move the fucking mountains.

It's okay.

Heaven is with us.

Yes, motherfucker, we're gonna be on that shit doing that shit.

That is the most powerful shit I have.

It's the unlimited, it's a source of unlimited confidence for me.

Unlimited confidence.

That's what honestly, that's what it is.

Unlimited confidence.

The cosmic outlook I have, cosmic Marxism, it's a source of unlimited con uh confidence.

And I'm not saying you should be, you should have undue confidence because that's autism, devoid of social awareness and stuff, and go embarrass yourself.

But, like, if you actually have the confidence and you see the alignment between the vision you have and the nature of the cosmos, how it makes sense, how the story makes sense, how there's a resonance there, right?

That is a true confidence.

It's an unlimited source of confidence if you can actually tap into that.

And you can fucking do anything, and you'll never fucking worry about anything.

I don't worry about a fucking thing ultimately.

I don't.

I've learned to just not worry about a fucking I literally don't worry about anything.

Do I get frustrated?

Absolutely.

You just fucking saw me fucking chimp out over this fucking piece of shit Mike and this retarded fucking

bandwidth problem I just fucking had.

But in the long term, am I gonna fucking be tripping over that, having cortisol spikes?

No.

In the short term, I'll be very explosive.

I have a high temper.

I'm a very explosive person.

But uh in the long term do I have anxiety?

Do I have it?

Absolutely fucking not.

So, if you're in the party and you're freaking out, sometimes people in the party freak out.

I've seen it.

I've seen rank and file just fucking get a lot of anxiety and freak the fuck out.

And it's like, this message is for you.

Chill the fuck out.

Everything's going to be good.

You know, I remember when I was living in isolation from the world because I shunned the world.

I had this dream.

Um

Where, you know, I w I had a lot of revolutionary anxiety and I was so upset that I just

We're we're doing Lennon wrong, we're failing him.

Today, you know, and then I had this dream where I was like, I was in this living room.

I was like a kid.

I was in this living room with these, and with this, I guess I was staying with like a Chinese family.

And like, I was like, I think I would be like, I was 10 years old, and there was like a bunch of other Chinese kids.

There's like two or three of them.

Almost like they kind of gave me cousin vibes, honestly.

And I was just sitting there, and they were like on their shelf, they had like a shit ton of pirated, like Pokemon, like everything you would want as a kid.

They just had it, and it was like all pirated.

Like video games, Pokemon, whatever.

And I, you know, the vibe was basically like they just got it from the factory.

They just took it.

Like, they didn't have to fucking buy it.

It's like cheap, dirt cheap, and like whatever.

They just have all that shit.

Right?

Um

But ultimately, you know, I was w they were just kind of showing me and they were like, Yeah, but ultimately it doesn't matter, kind of like, yeah, who cares about all this shit?

And then we put it away, and then I remember we like sat on the couch and then they kind of

They kind of spoke to me and they're like, listen, don't worry.

We're Gucci.

Everything's gonna be good.

And then the fucking living room turned into it.

Turns out it's a fucking spaceship.

Fucking turned upwards like this, the entire room.

The fucking thrusters started blasting.

And we're fucking launching into space.

Like, we're going to socialism.

Don't worry.

That's literally what was like, don't worry.

We're on the way to socialism.

Just chill.

Everything's part of the plan.

Just don't worry.

I had this dream, I think it was 2018, 2019, I had this dream.

And

It was only a few months after that dream that I finally acknowledged.

Not maybe, not a few, maybe a few weeks.

That dream unironically inspired me to reevaluate everything I thought about China.

That dream.

Like they were just saying, I was a kid in the dream.

They're like, listen, bro, just chill.

It's Gucci.

We got it all locked down and figured out.

We're on the way.

Like, don't worry.

We're already on the way to socialism.

That was fucking

That was a life-changing dream I had.

Keep in mind, I was living years in total isolation before COVID.

Um,

And I was living in isolation because

I uh

I was very like it was like a religious retreat.

It was like uh

I was like, you you kinda just can drop out and withdraw from this retarded society and just actually think about what matters.

Yeah, I was in school, but I would have online classes and I wouldn't show up to class.

I would only show up for the tests.

Unironically, you guys know this, I would show up to class in tattered shirts.

I'd had t-shirts that were fucking ripped.

I would just wear that shit.

I wouldn't give a fuck.

I literally didn't care.

I didn't even take care of my appearance at all.

Like, I showered, I didn't smell bad, but I just did not give a fuck.

I literally shunned the world.

I would walk around with a fucking tattered shirt with like totally ripped up.

Wouldn't give a fuck.

And this wasn't law school, this was undergrad, this was not law school.

Law school was during the uh lockdown.

I had a fucking giant unkempt beard and I was just like

I uh

I wanted to just kind of dis l know what it means to know Marxism truly, you know?

Uh

But like how do you live being a Marxist in this world?

is like the question I was struggling with.

Like what kind of fucking world do we live in and what does it actually mean to commit myself to this specific lineage and tradition?

Um

Anyway, but that dream was very impactful.

So.

Allah, it doesn't mean hold back.

This is the problem with Western Buddhists.

I wasn't in a frat.

Western Buddhists are just become lazy bum fucks and they're just kind of pussies.

They're just like, I'm just going to cross my legs.

And you need to have the sense and optimism of a Buddhist and peacefulness, inner peace of a Buddhist, but the fanaticism and zeal.

of an Abrahamic, which is Islam when you think about it.

You need to like have, you need to push it to the fucking limit.

Don't think you don't have to worry, by the way, and preempt.

Oh, I already know what the limit's gonna be.

We don't fucking know.

All we know is that it's all gonna work out.

All we can be certain of is that everything is gonna work itself out.

We have no fucking clue how that's gonna happen.

We have no fucking clue how shit's gonna work itself out.

We just know it will.

We just know all this shit's gonna work itself out.

Do we know how it will?

Absolutely fucking not.

We just know it will.

You know?

Alright, I have some people who want to debate.

There's a Russian guy named Pavel who's been waiting, sleeping all night.

He's gonna go first.

Pavel, what's up?

I know you have this big theory you want to present to the stream.

If you just want to present a theory, I recommend you put it in writing, and I will share it to the Discord.

We'll look at it, and you'll have your time in the sun.

But if you genuinely want to debate, let's debate.

But I know I told you we could do this, but I'm thinking about it, and it's like, I don't know how much airtime we have for you to just give a guest lecture as a professor.

So I don't mean to be insulting, but I just got to be real with you, bro.

Yeah, okay.

Uh so first of all it's not my theory.

Uh there's this uh Dagestani guy called Shaban Mamaev.

Like he's a market.

Any names or links you want, just put 'em in the show requests so we can all look at it.

Yeah, hold me alright, I'll I'll put them.

Um But yeah, continue, please.

Already caught me off guard.

Hold up.

Just do it do it after.

You don't have to do it right now.

Just uh afterwards, you know?

Yeah, hold up, I'll switch my Wi-Fi as well.

Okay, Pablo, I'm gonna give you some time and

I don't know.

Are you staying up or you just woke up?

Oh.

Have you been staying up this entire time or you just woke up?

No, I slept like three hours, so it's okay.

It's okay.

I've had sleep, I had coffee, listened to the stream, got energized, it's okay bro.

Alright, okay, please continue.

No, no, why?

So uh yeah, so this this theory is that uh the money commodity is uh labor power.

Why?

Because uh I mean

I mean, it's the only true like generic commodity that exists in the whole world, in the whole capitalist imperialist world.

Uh gold is like a specific commodity and a s at a certain point of development why would you labor power is the commodity?

Is this globally or only nationally?

Uh I'm seeing

globally it's the money commodity.

Like m I mean, maybe in uh each country internally is the l it's the money commodity.

Some not as international money.

We need to we need a way for this to be a functional theory though, you know, because

Like, okay, so how does it explain dollar hegemony?

The dollar is a reserve.

How does it explain that?

How does power valorize the US dollar?

It's a trick question.

Well, uh

It does that because uh

Because because it replaced gold.

So when it when uh the gold when the gold era ended,

But how directly?

I understand gold is basically saying.

How how okay, so for marks, gold?

Is a store of value.

Okay?

By the way, this theory you have could be interesting.

But for Marx, gold was a store of value and therefore became the commodity that simply's only use value is that it's exchange value.

Now you're saying that has become labor power.

Now, labor power, according to Marx.

Is the not the uh real is realized concrete labor, but it's kind of like uh the price of labor, the the price of a potential, basically.

Labor power is a potentiality, more or less, right?

And that is on the market.

Its going rate, so to speak, would be like determined by the labor market.

Now, what is the fundamental quantum?

of labor power as a value, how is it measured?

And like what

What discrete commodity we can say is labor value?

What's the baseline?

Yeah, well you have to you have to differentiate, right?

Like there's this generic uh notion of labor power and there's this uh specific like there's very specific labor powers.

I mean uh because like a programmer or a builder they're gonna have different uh qualities of labor powers.

Okay, but there has to be a s a single quantum that we can use as a reference point.

So what's the quantum?

Uh yes, so what is the general form of labor power?

Um

Well, there's no abstract general labor power that exists like that.

Yeah, I know, there's only different types.

So that's the problem I would have with the theory right off the bat.

How can we measure see, I would be interested in I tried to explore this kind of idea that interest rates might be a proxy for a general form of labor power.

I tried to study this idea in 2017, twenty eighteen, but it was too complicated for me.

But what what would be the gener interest rates are centralized, there's only the central bank interest rates are like you know, um they have a kind of quality of being singular.

Um, they're set from above, there's only one national interest rate, so to speak, by the central bank.

And that could maybe be a reliable proxy for the general form of um

Labor, right?

But because it measures in some sense the continuous activity within society.

But it turned out to be too complicated.

But what would be the equivalent of that in this case?

Because if there isn't one, then the theory is bunk, so to speak.

Um okay, I need I need to specify what do you mean by uh because I can just say like yeah, there's uh the the unit of measuring uh labor power as a commodity is time.

Of course, you buy se segmented time chunks of labor power, but now there's uh labor so for Marx and Engels.

There's the general form of labor is basically the unskilled labor, right?

The most simple base form of you go out of high school or something, you get just a fucking job, and it doesn't require any skillfulness with specialty.

The more you have specialization within the division of labor via skillfulness, this is just kind of compounding.

A pregiven quantum of labor.

Uh you know

Intensifying it or vice or the reverse or something.

But there's a baseline where we could say, okay, this is just a plain, general form of labor.

And these skilled forms of labor are just kind of taking this and maybe multiplying it or uh you know compounding it, so to speak, so that it is on the market more valuable.

But ultimately

There's it's a s simple kind of labor, right?

So what is the equivalent of that in this case?

No, well it's the same it's the same simple uh kind of labor, it's the same I mean but if if this theory doesn't try to wrestle with that question concretely and say, okay, for example, maybe this is blue collar labor, maybe this is this industry or this specific sector of the market the labor market or something, I mean like I I can't we can't work with this, man, I'm sorry, there's not a lot if you can maybe you could link it and we could learn more, but so far I just don't think this is gonna go anywhere.

Um, yeah, all right.

So like there's an intensity, a uh an average intensity in the whole industry of labor, right?

There's a um a minimum set of skills that changes with uh

As production changes, a minimum set of skills required from any labor power.

So, I mean,

The baseline can be like really unskilled labor and uh Okay, I don't I don't I'm not interested in what it can be.

For this theory to have functional significance for me, I d I can't work with metaphysics that simply says this is what maybe would make sense.

Where can we actually analyze

Even at a mathematical level, how we could put this to use in our understanding of how the economy works.

Because gold has a store of value, we can do something with that.

Gold measures labor power, or it measures labor value, I should say, because of the labor that goes into the mining and so on, excavation of gold, or it's at least a proxy for how much that would be.

So, okay, now you're saying labor power has replaced gold.

That just baffles me.

I don't even know what that could possibly mean.

I mean, I kind of understand, okay, so.

The basis of

Money is just directly labor value, but how does labor value come to be priced and measured based on what?

You're you're so talking about some statistics, like some uh concrete data?

You're talking about that?

I'm I'm no, I d I'm not appealing to the authority of statistics or asking for that authority.

I'm asking what makes this theory better than anything else, okay, 'cause th you know what is it called?

The um corn theory of value?

You guys know about that?

Where there was this kind of counter fa or this kind of uh counter proposal by My Sians or libertarians, like, well, what corn can be a measure of value rather than labor, why not corn?

Oh, okay, okay.

So, this has a concrete benefit, because it allows us to understand socialism better.

And also,

Like what Nikitin did to inductively understand the he came to the conclusion inductively through the fact that, look, gold is no more associated with the dollar than what it is.

Well, he made an an analysis and found that, well, the money commodity has to be constantly exchanged on the internal market, right?

Because, I mean,

The the pieces of paper themselves, they have no value.

So you have to buy the money commodity to get it in your hands, then to uh then to use it up or to sell it again.

So it has to be circulating.

And the most actively circulating since the seventies, and we know the seventies is when the Bretton Woods system completely collapsed.

Well since then the most the most actively traded commodity, the most um the the commodity that had the most contact with fiat currency is labor power.

It's the uh is the fund is the salary funds uh in in uh all the advanced countries.

We see that in all the advanced countries salary fund is different from wages though.

We're not talking about traditional labor power anymore, we're talking about something else.

And then also how do we take into account four hundred one Ks?

How do we take into account welfare from the government?

How do we so I just I don't find this theory very convincing.

I just think it's like, okay, we are still using fiat currency to

We're still using currency, it's still being used as a measure of value for people to buy and sell things and sell their labor and so on and so on.

But does that mean that because

I mean, wha you could just find any commod you can find oil for energy, you could find water because it's very ubiquitous, and say this is the secret thing.

It's like I just I don't th the the the rational premises don't add up to me, and that's my problem.

Let's try that another way, through socialism, through the fact that imperialism, as Lenin pointed out, it's slowly creeping towards socialism itself.

Okay.

Okay, so we know that in socialism it's a transitionary period.

There's a bourgeois right and there's a fundamental exchange.

There's a fundamental exchange.

Labor vouchers, they're not money, right?

What makes labor vouchers not money?

Why is it that I can't like give my labor vouchers to some guy and buy something that he made and not directly buy from our semi-state, our worker state?

'Cause they 'cause they don't don't circulate, right?

So, labor vouchers, they're just representative.

They're just representing the fact that I gave a few hours of work to vote to.

Hey, Pablo, I'm familiar with what labor vouchers are, and I'm familiar with the reasoning behind them.

I'm familiar with Marx's reasoning.

You need to appreciate that I have the knowledge about this.

I've spent

The majority of my life

Um when when there was the first hair that came onto my lips

My life has been devoted to understanding this.

Please do not repeat it.

Only give me the things that are new, please.

Just tell me the new ideas and theory you have.

Oh, okay.

So, this is basically a simple exchange.

You're exchanging your labor power.

All right, you know what, Pavel?

I'm sorry.

My patience has reached this limit.

I'm sorry.

Because you're saying, okay, this is, I know what simple exchange.

I told you not to fucking tread any fucking familiar ground and just directly give me this new fucking theory.

Directly give me the new fucking theory.

I don't have the patience.

I have Arab patience, which is very thin.

I have explosive temper and low patience.

All right.

I'm sorry, but like I literally it's very difficult for me to keep up with that.

Because there's the substance, it's just we're not getting at the substance.

All right.

Give me the thing that's new.

Give me the part of this theory that's don't retread.

Okay, because this and that, and it's like.

I can't.

I can't.

I mean, I put it this way, I know the fundamentals of Marxism.

If I didn't arrive on the basis inductively of those same fundamentals that you did, focus on why we disagree.

Because I know the fundamentals.

Now you're saying, well, it's as simple as just putting the pieces together.

I just find it find that a little insulting.

I've spent a lot of my life trying to put those pieces together.

I know what it means to try and put the pieces together.

So I've done this, I've attempted it.

Tell me why your way is better.

I don't know.

I just find, I don't like the okay, look.

Maybe the original economist who came up with this has an interesting idea.

of some kind.

Um and and and maybe this

Maybe it adds up to something, but uh

I find it extremely confused because I don't think it actually squares up to the complexities of finance.

How does this square with

For example, the derivative.

The commodity that we call a derivative.

How does this square with the dynamic nature of int interest rates?

And you know, how does it square with the fact that the fiat economies don't actually have don't tend toward um

Even balance sheets, but yield kind of unlimited debt, right?

And it's like I don't find it sophisticated to just be like, oh, instead of gold, we move to labor power.

You could abstractly that sounds nice.

How do we put that theory to work in a functional way?

In a way that we can concretely analyze.

I just feel like this is metaphysical Marxism, where we're just kind of through induction alone arriving at a conclusion dogmatically.

And then it's free.

It it doesn't add anything to our analysis.

It doesn't give us more insight about the world.

It just kind of

Is something we can impose on the world from the top and, you know.

Hope that it ma it maintains consistency.

The river is just a scam.

Um

Okay, you know, but that's kind of not true.

Derivatives are pretty.

complicated mathematically, first of all.

Um

And um

There's a lot of different types of derivatives, right?

And you know, there's Suhail Malik's ontology of finance, ultimate sued article, but it's like he's got a point.

You know, this is.

There's something a little very sophisticated about this.

You can't just outright dismiss it as a scam.

There's something about this that taps into a very

um complex or I don't know how I'd put it uh m more intelligent dimension of being, if you will, right?

in the sense like i i th there's these potentialities we can make potentiality an intelligible potentiality itself and measure things at this fucking level is pretty advanced actually, right?

Um

The fact thing about forex markets.

The fact that

The exchange rate between currencies has itself

Become a derivative, a commodity, right?

You know, who else cared about derivatives?

It was Karl Marx.

If there's anything to derivatives, it's risk.

Totally agree.

Yeah, but risk is part of.

Uh

It's something there is something ontological about that when you think about it.

You know?

We need to screw.

Yeah, absolutely.

We have a lot of fucking work to do.

I don't like easy shortcuts.

I just don't.

You know, the court of the con is open and we got all sorts of people with ideas.

I open the court, but I'm sometimes I'm just not having it.

Okay, no, I know you wanted to go.

Okay, no, you don't you believe Hitler

Wasn't an anarchist, right, that's what you want to debate about?

Yeah, you have fifteen seconds to unmute your mic.

Yeah, so uh can you hear me?

Yeah.

Yeah, so uh I agree with most of you.

I watched the first video that you uh that Hitler was an anarchist that you made.

And I have to say that I agree with most of your criticisms of anarchism, but I disagree with the reasoning behind them and I also uh kind of disagree on some points, right?

Don't care, just get right to it.

Get right to the meat and potatoes of what you want to say and and what your argument is.

Yeah, so my argument is, first of all, I I would say uh uh things that I agree with you.

No, I don't give a shit.

You don't give a shit.

Tell me what you disagree about.

Well, all right.

Uh so your argument uh one of your arguments was that uh this was the first line in the video actually that anarchists are just uh uh fascists are just anarchists but they have reign over a state, right?

Yep.

Yeah, so I don't disagree with that actually.

I All right, you know what?

Get the fuck out of here, bro.

You're done.

You have one more chance to articulate an argument that's a disagreement.

Otherwise you're fucking banned from the server.

All right?

You have one more chance.

No retreading ground.

No saying, my argument is: no, just fucking get right into it.

All right.

Go ahead.

I dude.

Uh uh

I have to I mean English is not my first language dude, you have to understand, I have to get to it slowly.

Anarchism is uh people are attracted to anarchism for various reasons, all right?

And people are attracted to different ideologies for various reasons.

Now, the reasons that they are attracted to anarchism and later on they do something which is authoritarian, that does not disprove that uh anarchism is authoritarian, the same way that it does not disprove uh if some person is attracted to Marxism and its its components, but he does not behave in line with Marxist philosophy and he does something weird and strange, then it does not mean that Marxism is to blame for it, right?

Okay, so what's an example of anarchists affecting their will into reality in some way that was non-authoritarian?

Is there has there ever been an example of that ever?

Because I can give you examples of Marxists affecting their will into reality in ways that align and correspond to the method and theory of Marxism.

But I cannot say that there is a single example of anarchists affecting their will into reality in a way that is non-authoritarian, in a collective and organized capacity.

So give me a single Gandhi was an anarchist.

Who?

Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi.

Yeah.

Mahatma Gandhi, the Hitlerite, the Pederast Gandhi.

Well, he was a pedo, but yeah, I didn't even know he was a pedo, I just guessed.

So where what so it wasn't authoritarian where he was raping children?

Gandhi, the the literal Nazi Gandhi, the guy who fucking upheld the caste system.

You're saying this is an example of a virtuous, consistent anarchist?

He literally defended and upheld the caste system.

How can you say this is anarch you just nuked yourself.

No, listen, first of all, uh the caste system is not completely what you think it is, all right?

Because I am an Indian as well, so I kind of know uh something about the anarch the caste system is okay, just to be clear, the caste system is compatible with anarchist principles.

Uh

It is it is compatible with collectivist anarchism, yes.

Continue, please, continue.

So first so the first thing is anarchism caste system it needs not be decided from birth.

It does not need to be that if you are a son of X then you have to be X or if you are a son of Y you have to be Y alright.

So the thing about caste system is it has different interpretations inside of Hinduism and what Gandhi's thing was Gandhi believed that every village should should be its own unit which it behaved as.

So inside every village there were farmers, there were artisans, there were different types of people who maintained the society inside of the village.

It was completely it could it could remain completely inert from the rest of the society and still be functioning.

Right.

So Gandhi, yeah, and this system, inside of this system, different people were organized with different occupations and this was the caste system.

The occupation that they have been assigned was their caste, was their varna, you can say in Hindi.

So Gandhi upheld this.

Gandhi was not of the belief that we need to discriminate amongst the caste, which is the real problem, is the discrimination, not assigning different people differently.

What about the Dali each session?

What about the untouchables?

Yeah, he met with the untouchables and he uh ate with them.

He was not of the belief that

Yeah.

Oh my god!

Did he shake?

He didn't shake their hand, did he?

Because that would blow my mind.

Did he shake their hand?

Why do you think that he would be so opposed to it?

Did he breathe the same air as them, God forbid?

What what's your point here, so just make your argument?

Do you understand how incredibly fucking primitive it is for me to hear that you're uh extolling as somehow an example that Gandhi recognized the inherent dignity, God given dignity of man?

That he actually didn't he didn't see Dalits as lesser because he ate with them.

Okay, he was.

No, but it's just it came off so ridiculous.

He ate with the

Yeah, yeah.

That doesn't mean anything else with them, okay?

There's an existing system, the caste system, which in India corresponds to an incredible level of social discrimination, corresponds to an incredible level of sectarianism, hierarchy, a sense of subjugation, a sense of subjecting some people to a lack of dignity.

I mean, everyday dynamics that you think about, like, you know, a woman from this caste can't marry a man from that caste.

A man, they won't associate.

Oh, Gandhi's so enlightened because he's some fucking enlightened individual.

How is he addressing the social phenomena of different castes treating each other differently?

Oh, he's wagging his finger.

No, the institution of the caste system, fundamentally, fundamentally.

Right?

Is beneath the inherent God-given dignity of a human being.

And you're saying this is compatible with anarchism.

I rest my argument.

When I say anarchism is fascist, you make the case for me.

No, listen, man.

I just I just can't.

You have to engage in some good faith kind of a discussion.

You can't just.

You're actually here in good faith.

Your apologia for the caste system.

I'm not buying it.

I'm not apologizing for the caste system.

I'm just saying that it's compatible with collectivistic anarchist principles.

First of all, no, it's not.

If the discrimination and the stratification of the caste system is removed, then yes, it is compatible with the correctly.

IRC does not recognize division of labor.

It does not recognize a fixed division of labor in anarchism.

Because it doesn't recognize a coordinated division of labor, because the coordination of a division of labor depends upon authority.

Anarchism rejects authority.

If anarchism rejects authority, it rejects the entire principle of division of labor.

No, actually, well, it does not reject authority, yes or no?

It rejects hierarchy, not authority.

Both are different.

Anarchism didn't make as its slogan the rejection of authority, really?

Why did Frederick Engels write on authority then?

Well, if you go to a doctor and you go for a brain surgery, would you not respect his authority?

Would you stand up and say, Well, I don't respect your authority on the subject of biology?

No, anarchism does not say that.

If you read any kind of an anarchist book, it does not say that you can't take you can't understand the authority of other people or you can't understand the authority of let's say the religion.

Frederick Engels' book on authority, right?

Yeah, I guess.

So, I mean, that's the wonderful thing about a phrase like anarchism.

It could just mean whatever the fuck we want it to.

We just don't bad people in power.

I'm an anarchist.

I just don't like when bad people are in power.

I'm okay with power.

I'm okay with all this stuff.

I just don't like when it's bad, unchill people.

I just like chill people.

Hey, I'm an anarchist.

I just like chill people.

That's my ideology.

No, that's not the ideology I no, I just think ideology is I just don't like unchill people, I like chill people.

Well, if you're going to repeat that then uh do, but let me make my point.

If you're going to just repeat your uh straw man again and again,

Go ahead.

Yeah, so anarchism does not say that you cannot respect the authority of other people.

It is for authority.

It says that you can go to a barber for getting a haircut.

You can go to a doctor.

You have to respect the authority of these people on specific matters.

The thing in here is, as soon as the doctor is done with your surgery, you do not have to do anything with him.

The doctor cannot force you to sit down and the doctor can kidnap you.

And also this authority that you have recognized within the doctor that is within your life.

Hey, hey, I'm an anarchist.

I believe doctors shouldn't be able to kidnap you after a surgery.

So you can't argue with that, honestly.

You just really can't argue with that, can you?

Yeah, we just don't think doctors should be able to kidnap you.

Okay, hold on, let me ask you a question.

So you're an anarchist, right?

And I'm your doctor.

Yeah.

And I perform surgery on you and then I kidnap you and lock you in a cage 'cause I have a fucking shotgun pointed at your head.

What are you gonna fucking do about it?

Nothing.

What if uh you are a communist and somebody does the same thing?

I'll fucking fight to the end whatever I can.

I'll fight because I will also do that.

I'll fucking get my army to fuck them up, put them in chains.

I would do that too.

No you won't.

That requires law.

That requires a fucking armed force.

That requires somebody enforcing fucking rules.

That requires s people walking around with guns who can fucking enforce shit.

Yeah, anarchists can do that.

Okay, was Joseph Stalin an anarchist?

Why wasn't Stalin an what what about Stalin violated anarchist principles then?

Because it w it was an hierarchy.

He was at the top.

He was enforcing rules.

No, so what?

So w so I just said you have to enforce rules if you don't want someone to kidnap you.

Who's gonna fucking enforce the rule?

Yeah.

You can enforce the rule through the law of the community.

The community can itself.

The community is an abstraction.

Communities require coordination.

Communities require a centralization of communications.

Multitudes actually know how to coordinate and organize with each other.

The idea that every single part of a multitude is going to simultaneously share telepathically the same fucking mind and coordinate in unison in a way that reflects the will of every single person independently is a fucking retarded fairy tale.

And moreover, the idea that the time exists on earth for the opinion of every single person to be checked, do you consent?

Do you consent?

Do you consent?

So that every single person simultaneously unites their will and acquiesces to the will of the collective by making sure that it corresponds to that of the individual.

There's not enough time on fucking earth for that to be possible.

You're talking about a form of organization where it's among us emergency meetings forever.

So don't give me this shit about the community.

The community is not an individual agent.

It's not a subject.

It's not an agent.

It has no directly measurable will of its own.

The only thing that can measure the will of a community is an organized authority.

And the only way an authority can articulate itself is through leaders.

Leaders that have voices, that have faces, that have skin in the game, and are fucking accountable.

This is what all revolutionaries in history had to fucking learn the hard way.

This notion that a fucking horizontal community of a bunch of fucking people wearing dresses and sandals, sitting crisscrossed, sitting next to each other, fucking doing drum Congo fucking hippie drums with fucking dreads and shit, the idea that this fucking exists and can do anything whatsoever and in any way affect any kind of fucking will is a fucking nonsense retarded idea for children.

Well, whatever you mm whatever makes you sleep better, I guess.

Now where what country do you live in?

India.

Okay, this is why India is backwoods right now.

Because you have people like you running around thinking that this is you can you can just oh, I'm an anarchist, I could just sit around in a circle banging drums.

But but the problem that you have is you're taking that the only one who gives voice to the community is the father of the people, Stalin, Xi Jinping.

There's no fucking community we can speak about besides he who has insight.

Lenin speaking like a fast.

Lenin!

Lenin!

spoke the word of the community.

Stalin, Ma, Xi Jinping as a community by itself, the community by itself is agonizing Lavinia from Shakespeare.

Raped, suffering with blood.

Spilling out of her mouth war with devoid of a word.

Only he who recognizes the community, gives word to the community, is the dispenser of justice on earth, the shadow of God on earth.

That was Lenin, that's Stalin, that's Mao, that's Xi Jinping.

These are men with faces or women with authority, with accountability, with skin in the game, who say, This is the type of fucking business I stand on.

Measure whether I fucking do or not, bitch.

That's there's nothing that bypasses that.

Nothing.

This notion of a horizontal community exercising its will, fucking retarded copium lies.

It's ridiculous.

Yes, who give you reasoning on life is ridiculous.

And you gave your reasoning, but okay, then I'm going to answer that.

Yes, you're right.

As in the community on itself, cannot have a plebiscite on every single fucking thing to agree on it needs a leader.

It cannot ask everybody.

No, that people will be incentivized to act in this way because the goals a leader.

There's every fucking group on earth has a leader.

Give me a single fucking group on planet Earth that doesn't have a fucking leader.

Just one.

Because there's always one motherfucker who the buck has to stop with where shit goes wrong, somebody's gotta fucking eat shit for it, right?

It's always one fucking person that people fucking count on.

That this guy fucking knows it.

Now, to what whether, you know, there's some leaders that are chiller and fucking more submerged and more willing to listen and more receptive.

And there's some leaders that are fucking assholes.

But at the end of the day, every fucking collective, every group on earth has a leader.

Give me one exception.

Well there always will be a leader, even an anarchist.

Give me one example of a collective formation devoid of a leader.

Yeah.