🔴 RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸 | PUTIN IS GOOD 🇷🇺

It was man.

Killing Keller.

Yeah.

I'm sick of sound without the sense of feeling

upstairs suicidal

something

Up there too many pills, so much pros so much pain too many emotions

That you do good, it just goes unnoticed.

Did they tell you that you could and just stay focused?

Mama, you was the life of the party.

I swear you brought life to the party.

When you lost your life, it took the life out the party.

That woman rode with me like a Harley.

Visions of my cousin in the cell really scar me.

Moving to the hood was like signing up for the army.

Cause they've been killing since watching Barney.

You want dreams to come true, but I had nightmares.

Cause if that comes to life, then I might not be right here.

Been in the dark so long, don't know what the light here.

But I'm just reaching for the scars like Buzz Light, yeah.

And now I'm light years ahead of those nightmares.

I dare to those night tears when the night clears.

And if I talk to Christ, can I bring my mother back to life?

And if I die tonight, will I see it in the afterlife?

But back to reality where everything's a tragedy.

And better have a strategy, or you could be a statistic.

Little boy dies, he just wanted a mystic.

And mama steady crying, cause she really the victim.

Now she's getting high and she's getting addicted.

And the older boy just stuck with the picture, painted vivid.

That's a family portrait.

And a daughter just absorbed it.

16, pregnant, baby daddy said she should afford it, but we can't afford it.

So she decides to move forward.

Baby shower time, father didn't show up.

Now she just feeling nauseous, like she finna throw up.

The water flows down her legs, yeah, it's finna go up.

A year that went by, a daughter just turned one.

And she's still depending on her mom.

Big brother in the streets, he went and bought him a gun.

He wants revenge cause the pain feeling numb.

And a mom still doing drugs, cause that's the only time she feels love.

Is it real love?

Do the scars really heal up from all the pain that's been built up?

But they don't feel us.

A week then flew by, Big Bro riding, then he see the guys at this little brother on the side, bleeding from the side.

He's seeing red, it's like it's bleeding through his eyes.

See him dead, the only thing that helped the grieving up inside.

He even let him get their last meal.

He's done with the streets after this, this is last kill.

He gotta show him that it's that real.

He ran up on him with a pipe, let's stand still.

You tripped my brother like you made my mother cry.

Tell me one reason I shouldn't send you up to Christ.

He said, Go ahead, take my life, I seen everything but Christ.

The big bro just blacked out, and all you seen was the light.

One.

True and living God, the beneficent, the merciful.

Thank you for bringing me up the rough side of the mountain like Earthruel.

Every knee bowed and every tongue confessed and paid homage to the monk who visited rock childs like the lonely is dead Panonica.

It's JLEC Antendronica coming through your monitor.

Back from the great and yonder, the son of man and the son of Donda.

I never rode the jigsaw, the R6 or the Honda.

But I flew my Ducati through North America like Wakanda.

Earthquakes will strike this nation for what Bush did to Rwanda.

What the Clintons did to Haiti and down the street did to Ghana.

It's a folks lonely, call me Toto Moto, oh Negro Local.

I shake the tectonic crates of the game if I lay one focal.

The god is interstellar while you fellas remain local.

My bars is like the pyramid temples, apocalypse.

As yours to DOJ confirmed Ezekiel's will, I can change the world like Gaku, but two pieces of steel.

My sword and my microphone, I scored the Christmas.

But when you great, they wanna see you took a L, Jose Caille.

I'm in the fight here, fight here for what seemed like life years.

A rugged cross and thorny crown squeeze out Christ tears.

30 pieces of silver cloth by Pierre Price tear.

It's a war outside, it's a war outside.

It's like the last days of Sodom and Gamor outside.

Know someone that needs

I want to thank you for taking the fight for my father to the old office.

You might not have been the only one that could have done that, but you were the one that did do that.

And with your assistance, we can continue to let the world take part in this fight.

You know, to me, it kind of feels like me, my mother, my brothers, and my kids have all been incarcerated through this journey.

And we haven't even been to jail.

We have been looked at and treated as criminals for being a part of this family.

My father's truth and the reality that he raised me in is that he wanted to make a change in this community.

Because the conditions in this capitalist society is what made him and it's what made the children of the day.

After 25 years of being locked down 23 and 1, my father has not called any shots from one of the most secure and segregated prisons in the world and will not, once released, call any shots for the gates of the cycle.

If my father's intentions were to lead us to death, destruction, and to the hell that he has had to live in for the past 26 years,

He would be dead to me.

I didn't sign up for that.

I didn't stay on this journey this long for that.

All my life, man, I've been waiting for my father to come home.

They told me

When I graduate eighth grade, he'll be home.

Then they told me when I graduate from high school, he'll be home.

I went away to Morris Brown.

I graduated and he still ain't home.

Now I'm a adult and my daughter went away to college and graduated.

Still not home.

Now, even more than that, my son, he graduated in eighth grade and we still waiting.

Matter of fact, he hasn't hugged, kissed, or touched any of his grandchildren, and they haven't been able to touch their grandfather.

Even though it is not seen that way for some of us, but for many of us, Blarry Hoover is a beacon of hope for his community who deserves to breathe free air.

Free my father, Mr.

Larry Hoover Singh.

Gonna ride.

I guess I had to go to that place to get to this one.

Now some of you might still be in that place.

trying to get out.

Follow me.

I'll get you.

You can try and read my lyrics off of this paper before I lay them.

But you won't take this thing out, these words, before I say them.

Cause ain't no way I'm gonna let you stop me from crossing in.

When I say them, I do something, I do it.

I don't give a damn what you think.

I'm doing this for me.

So fuck the world, feed it being.

It's gased up.

If you think it's stopping me, I'ma be what I set out to be.

Without a doubt, I'm tired.

I'm bleeding.

All those who look down on me, I'm tearing down.

Fitz the bustle, try to ask him what

Still shitting whether he's on salary paid hourly until he piles out of his shit just piles out of him.

Whichever comes first, for better or worse.

He's married to the game, like I fuck you for Christmas.

Fuck the whole universe.

I didn't have to rhyme these words and the rhythm for you to know it's a rap.

You said you was king, you lied through your teeth.

For that, fuck your feelings.

Instead of getting crowned, you're getting capped into the fans.

I never let you down again.

I'm back.

I promise to never go back on that promise.

In fact, let's be honest, at last, we last CD was there.

Perhaps our random accents into the

Let's get some high energy in this chat.

If you're not afraid, take a stand.

There's a game called Circle March.

Sun Gorilla March.

Tryna figure this crap out.

Thought I had it mapped out, but I guess I didn't.

There's fucking black clouds that wall.

My life.

I did it for me, admittedly.

I probably did it subliminally for you.

So I could come back a brand new me.

You helped see me through and don't even realize what you did.

Cause believe me, you, I've been through the ringer.

But taking too little to the middle finger, I think I got a tear in my eye.

I feel like the king of my world haters can make like bees when your stingers and drop dead.

From there, I wanna bring it.

Some race.

Single single

Jason is

Chilly answers to the call.

With 30 rocks, the cop looked like Alec Ball with inner century anthems based off inner city tantrums, based off the way we was branded.

Face it, Jerome gets more time than Brandon.

And at the airport, they check all through my bag and tell me that it's random.

But we stay winning.

This week has been a bad massage.

I need a happy ending and a new beginning.

And a new fitted.

And some job opportunities is lucrative.

Just the real world, homie school finished.

They just stole your dreams.

You don't know who did it.

I treat the cash the way the government treats.

I won't be satisfied till all my niggas get it.

Get it?

Ain't no fussy if I want it.

I need it.

In the snow, you quickly low.

I'm only it, so why you play?

I'm saying I will never ever let you let this down.

Hip hop just

Get ready, y'all.

Yeah.

You know what I feel like?

I feel like that scene from Dune Two with Paul Atreides where he says I see multiple possibilities, multiple.

And then I see one line.

One line to cut through all of them.

And if we could do it, it just might work out.

You know that scene?

That's exactly the type of time that we're on over here.

Sign up, Shorty, with the one.

What's going on?

That's exactly the type of time that we're on over here.

You know, this whole communism thing.

That's what it is.

This is exactly what it is.

In a sea of multiple possibilities, there's one, you cleave right through all of them.

One succession of events, one time circuit, one path, the golden path, the golden Stalinist path.

And you can forcefully.

and at the expense of the lazy and idle inclinations that would lead history in a different direction,

Impose upon the history of mankind.

Impose upon

The very history of the cosmos and the universe.

A communist future, a red future.

That is precisely what it's all about.

And it doesn't come easy.

You see,

Let me go ahead and say something here.

These uh what do you call them, groipers?

Their symbol is a fat, lazy frog.

They go, Haz, you're brown, you're brown, you're not even American And then what do I see?

They import some British guy named Suleiman Ahmed.

To be their figurehead to

And that guy sits by and he watches them say all these things about brown people to a guy named Haas who is simultaneously accused of being white by leftists.

And then I think I think, wow, the sickle fancy, the this is a coalition these right wingers are building, particularly the uh the Groipers.

It's a coalition of tethers, foreign tethers, and it's all based on sickle fancy, it's based on social networking.

And you don't think me and Jackson knew about how all that works?

We're very well aware of how that works.

Because they tried to groom Jackson into their ranks.

They knew they couldn't do it with me, but they underestimated Jackson.

They said this Haas guy, he's actually a dark Sith lord.

We can't compel him.

We can't use we can't use our uh

Jedi mind tricks on him 'cause he's actually an advanced Sith Lord.

But they underestimated Jackson 'cause he's young and they said, No, we could maybe bring Jackson over to our side and they tried.

They didn't understand where the KGB were ten steps ahead of them.

Anyway,

When you become Suleiman Ahmed or any of these other people, tethering to and orbiting and kissing and paying tribute, basically,

Oh my God, it's like that one guy from three hundred when he betrays the Spartans and he just gets soured with wealth and you know I wouldn't say women because but none the less wealth and clout and popularity

And it's just instantaneous.

You just get instant access to a ten years long

Online phenomena and movement.

Instantaneously you reap all the benefits of it.

And I am so baffled at these fools who continue to try and portray Hazaldeen as a fascist or a far-right person, or what do they say?

They say, oh, you're a Nazi, this and that.

If that was true, why wouldn't I have joined that coalition and been a prince?

Literally been treated like a fucking prince.

Had I joined their coalition?

Look, put this into perspective.

Race is not an issue for them because they brought over that Solimon guy.

You don't think they would have begged and prayed that a fucking warrior like me would have joined them?

You don't think they were

They literally would tell me and DM me.

Haz, I wish you would join us.

Us to sign up for the party announcement vetting process.

Redimos, thank you for the fifteen, but

If I was willing to tell you right now, why wouldn't I have announced it before?

There's a reason, okay?

What, am I just going to tell you on stream right now?

No.

We will tell you

When we can, okay, we can't do that right now.

Don't mean to sound like a dick.

Thank you for the 15, but it's like what?

I'm just going to say that now on stream.

I haven't thought about that.

We can't tell you about that right now.

There's too much at play and I can't even I'm not even gonna go into it.

Anyway, look.

Um

Has

It put it this way, okay?

Infrared is not the biggest movement on the internet.

Obviously it's not.

But that's because we're building our coalition from scratch, rather than joining the ones that exist.

as a strategy, which is what everyone everyone climbs through the ranks by brown nosing something that already exists.

By the way, Nick Fuentes did the same thing to the mainstream conservatives.

He used to

Forget what it was called.

He worked for some mainstream conservative thing before he, you know.

Went to the position he did.

And even then, he had to work in a coalition with Richard Spencer and all these people he now hates.

But but we didn't do it that way.

We

are being very selective about the coalition that we are building from scratch because we are raising the banner of a new authority, a new authentic authority built through conquest

And through the power of conviction and belief alone.

No need to brown nose anyone.

Okay.

In any case, let me continue.

Let me continue.

These people who say that they say I'm insincere, pan-leftists and liberals are like, oh, you're an Osborne, you're this, you're that.

Why wouldn't I join the existing?

I could literally do anything doing that.

Sammy Basije, let's say I didn't even believe in anything I said.

Let's say I don't even have any conviction and I don't have belief.

Even in the interest of making money, okay, and getting rich, if I was truly a grifter, I would have joined that coalition a long time ago.

I would have been rich.

You know how many whales are over there?

Literally, a lot of rich people, a lot of rich, rich, rich people.

And they will throw tens of thousands your way being in that coalition.

Red Deimos, even if I was a cynical, non-ideological person, just in the interest.

of getting a yacht.

It would have been way smarter to do that.

So, why didn't I do that?

Ask yourself that question.

Because not only do I not believe in the ideology of the far right, it's not just that I don't believe in that, it's that my actual beliefs and my actual convictions preempt the possibility of me selling out to them.

That's how strong my actual beliefs are.

So, put that into perspective.

Put that into perspective.

Anyway

It's so silly.

People don't use their head, they don't think.

But uh

Why am I bringing this up?

Because you see the sickle fancy.

You see the sickle fancy.

It's all a social network.

Everyone's friends, they're getting access to the cloud, all those things.

And our coalition is glued together by something different.

It's not glued together by friendship.

I think, I don't know if this is too much to say.

But I think I'm starting to kinda really get along with those Midwestern marks guys.

And you know,

Even f even friends, you know?

Uh that's that's how I see it.

But you need to understand that's very secondary.

It's like it's a coalition based on belief, based on shared conviction, based on a shared vision.

It's not based on social networking and sickle fancy or anything like that.

It's based on a shared vision and a shared conviction about American communism.

And that's what glues us together.

Not, oh, we have see a lot of these people they respond to me, they go, You know what, Haas?

America First is way more relevant than you guys.

Okay?

So what kind of coward did your father raise?

'Cause it's Father's Day.

It's gonna not gonna be Father's Day in six.

By the way, happy Father's Day.

I was actually at my family's house today, but what kind of coward did your father raise?

The person with the bigger number is who you're going to go and scatter to?

What are you, a fucking jackal, a hyena?

This is why you're not my audience.

You are a follower.

You're a sheep.

You are a you are, I mean, and and and you know, your leaders will admit it.

They'll say, we are the lions and they are the sheep, and that's what you are.

And I don't want to, I'm not trying to insult anyone.

But you know why do I always observe that these people are full of retards?

Thank you, Hots.

Hitler writes copying Bolsheviks all over again.

Farce.

Yeah.

But why?

You know, there's so many Autistic people and oftentimes retards.

Who were like, you know, like in friend groups, how there's like a kind of mentally disabled person and you just take care of them and you hang out with them and you have their back.

Like, I feel like they're very disproportionately represented in those ranks.

And they're just followers.

They just follow.

It's like, you know, it's not.

I mean, look, I'm not going to insult, I don't want to name names, but Space LaRouche.

You know, it's kind of like which which are the people that lack the

the kind of fortitude

To be like, no, this is what I believe.

This is my position.

I ride with this movement because this is what I believe.

Not because, you know, oh, I'm lonely and I want more friends and I want to go in the forest for forest retreats.

You know, like, which one?

Who are we looking for to be our partisans, to be in our army, to be our soldiers?

You know?

This is not a, you know, what?

People who are lonely and they want friends.

That's not what this is for.

Matter of fact, these far right people, what do they say?

They call each other friends.

F R E N S.

What a pathetic, pathetic worm you are.

You want friends, and that's what you're basing your political beliefs off of, the need for friendship.

My gorillas have the psychological fortitude to be locked in solitary confinement for five thousand years purely meditating and contemplating.

the wisdom of Enver Hoxha.

Just Enver Hoxha.

I didn't even mention Lenin, Stalin, Marx, Engels, just Enver Hoxha.

Five thousand years, legs crossed, meditating,

Enver hold job.

The collected works of Enverhoja, mastering that specific Albanian synthesis of dialectics.

See, that's what our gorillas are made of.

It's not about friendship.

You can have friends you can still have friends, but that's not w you're not gonna base your political beliefs on friendship.

You're gonna base your political beliefs on a very harsh and cold and ruthless and uncompromising conviction in relation to truth.

You see, that's the difference.

You guys aren't that relevant.

Okay, you had ten years.

You had ten years.

And we just got started.

Look, there's no need to get upset about this.

Just wait.

Just wait and see what has more longevity.

Anyway, uh um

Let's get to the substance, because people are saying things like, oh, right-wingers aren't the real dissidents.

Um, excuse me, well, um, you know.

Well, you know, neo-nazis are still censored and condemned publicly and stuff.

And it's like, you know, it's so funny.

Because when you go out in public and do your siege hails and do your Hitler salutes, there's no controversy about where you align.

Everyone's like, yeah, that's a neo-Nazi.

The liberals, your so-called liberal enemies, are so comfortable with you as an enemy.

They're so comfortable with you as a villain.

Like, they can tolerate you as a villain.

They're like, yeah, liberalism or neo-Nazism.

I'm happy that being the only choice.

They're happy that being the only choice.

What does that say?

Soviet squirtle, what's going on?

But hold on, think about this for a second.

When you go out in public and praise Hitler, nobody is questioning your sincerity.

Your biggest liberal enemies are saying that is a person who is a follower of what Hitler believed because they are comfortable with you as a so-called opposition, because they can handle you as an opposition, because it is a conflict for people to have to choose between a rotting and failing liberal capitalist system and the cannibalism and psychopathy of Nazism.

And liberals are fine with that being the only choice.

Think about it.

The only reason anyone votes for Joe Biden, the only thing they have to convince people, Anonymous, what's up?

This is Nick Fuentes.

It's been 3,000 years.

Should we check in on the captured gorilla?

Saloth Tsar, Salath Tsar, Salath Tsar.

I don't know what this means, but think about this for a second.

The only thing the Democrats run on is what?

Well, he's not Trump.

He's not a fascist.

He goes, Skibbity Toilet, when will you be debating Groipers?

Get in VC in the Discord.

Link the Discord, guys.

Get in the show queue.

We're going to bring him in.

But

Put it this way, they

What was I saying?

The only thing the Democrats run on, like Steve Colbert, skippity toilet, Trump is using Hitler's rhetoric.

Oh my god, if Joe Biden's really bad, but the alternative is Hitler.

They're fine with that being the only choice.

They're fine with that.

It doesn't bother them.

But tell me this.

Why is it that when any capital C communist movement arises, both historically and today, right now in America, tell me why liberals and liberal leftists refuse to recognize us?

Why don't they recognize us?

Why do they say that Haas is a fascist?

Why do they say that Eddie from Midwestern Marx is a Nazi?

Why do they say that Stalin is a red fascist?

Why do they say that, for example, Xi Jinping is a fascist?

Why can't they just acknowledge that we're communists with a capital C?

Because our position is so powerful, it's so revolutionary that even acknowledging it as a possibility threatens the integrity of liberal ideology and the liberal worldview.

Even acknowledging this as an alternative position to the mainstream liberal hegemony is fucking dangerous to them.

Even acknowledging that this golden path of communism is possible to have, you don't have to be a Nazi, you don't have to be a liberal.

You can be a Stalinist communist with a capital C.

Neither of them.

That is what they find dangerous.

They can't acknowledge that.

They can't concede that.

They need it so that the only option people have is being an alt-right degenerate or being a shill of the Democrats and the hegemony and the liberals.

They can't accept there's another possibility, one that reconciles the contradictions of our system, one that transcends these contradictions, which overcomes them on their own terms, which heals the wound by the spear which smote it.

As Zach pointed out,

One that addresses the root cause of the contradictions of our system, recognizes those contradictions, inscribes them on its flag and on its banner.

See, the communist way is it's indecipherable.

You can't domesticate it.

The liberals can't even acknowledge it.

They can't even accept it.

It's like it's speaking in a language that is completely incomprehensible to them.

Because communism is authoritarian, but it's not like a fascist dictatorship, and communism is national in form, but it's not nationalistic.

It's not liberal, but it's also not reactionary.

It's like the very fact.

That it's a possible outlook.

Threatens threatens that why do you think that is?

Because when liberals have to hit that big red button, the emergency button.

We're on our last legs.

System's about to implode.

They're going to hit the Hitler button.

That's the option, their plan B.

See, there's plan A, liberal hegemony, and they have a plan B, fascism.

And they are totally fine with that.

It's plan C that they're scared of.

You understand?

It's plan C.

It's plan C that has them shitting bricks.

It's plan C they don't even talk about.

Because the mere evocation, the mere semblance of the possibility of plan C has them waking up in cold sweats at night.

They can't even talk about that one.

It's such a given to them that they don't even talk about it.

Oh, of course we're not going to let communism win.

Are you crazy?

That was the view of the architects of the liberal world order in the post-war period.

It was just the given to them.

What do you think?

We're going to let the communist.

No, no, no, no, no way, no.

I mean, look, fascism's bad and we were flirting with it and stuff.

But come on, communism, that's like the end of the world.

That was the German liberal bourgeoisie in the Weimar era.

Communism, it's just, you can't even acknowledge it.

It's like, nope, may as well, may as well be the end of the world for them.

Well guess what?

I want to say this in my official capacity, uh without being hysterical.

I'd like to clear the air.

The end of the world is coming.

The apocalypse is coming.

And the horsemen of the apocalypse will be Mongol horsemen.

And they are coming to pillage and loot and burn to the ground the empire of the bourgeoisie.

And there is absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing.

Anyone, alt-right, liberal, pan-leftist, I don't care what you call yourself.

You stand in the way of this army and you are gonna get mowed down.

Doesn't matter what flag you raise or rally yourself under.

You can't stop the force of history itself.

You just can't.

You just can't.

Now let's get these people in V C.

Now I sound uh loud and scary.

I know a lot of these people are very timid.

Don't worry, I'm a civil person.

I'm uh we can uh very calmly break down the fundamental errors of your worldview and we'll let you repent even.

We'll let you repent, it's okay, it's a safe space to repent, and atone for the sin of having a fundamentally wrong, outmoded and false worldview.

Um and we will bring these groipers in our V C and we will see.

if they can stand to the challenge.

But let's do it.

You know, I see a lot on Twitter, so let's bring them in V C and let's see.

Because I'll be very calm.

I will be happy to calmly explain to these people why they are getting everything wrong.

Literally, everything wrong.

Okay.

For example,

One of the things they say is uh that the whole world teamed up against Hitler.

Really?

You're talking about the Phoney War.

Or are you talking about Operation Barbossa when they didn't open up a Western front?

The Soviets were single-handedly fighting the Nazis.

The West did nothing?

How is that teaming up against Hitler?

Listen, look, I want you to talk.

They themselves will admit this.

Why is it that veterans of the German army and the SS all admit that when the war was coming to a close and they realized, like, okay, shit, we lost the war, all of them unanimously went to the West and they thought they were gonna negotiate a deal with Eisenhower to relieve the West to go east.

And okay, at least don't let Germany be conquered by communism.

They literally got on their knees and begged Eisenhower and Churchill.

Come on guys, we're not going to let communism win.

So they uh they preferred liberalism over the communism.

Now you tell me who's teaming up on who.

They preferred the liberal capitalism over communism.

If these were socialists like they claim they were, why would they do that?

Wouldn't communism, if they were corre if they were telling the truth about who they were, be closer?

You know?

East Germany.

They claimed they were against degeneracy and casino capital.

I mean, East Germany was a much more well integrated, healthy, non-degenerate society than the West, but why did they prefer the West?

What was so bad about East Germany?

By by the if we just go by what they're s we're saying in their propaganda.

Because they're liars.

Because they're liars.

That's why.

Anyway, let's bring this guy up.

His name is King Trump.

Hello.

Go ahead.

Go ahead and speak.

There was a little bit of a delay from watching the stream, so I just muted the stream and now I now can hear you pretty clearly.

I think I should just start with my tweet, right?

Since this is what it's from, you tweeted something, and I replied to the tweet.

I said, Paz, you don't even believe in Jewish power.

The hegemony is Jewish and Zionist, and you fail to recognize the former.

You have no credibility to speak on who is a dissident and who isn't.

Great.

That's a great place to start.

So what makes you think the hegemony is Jewish?

Uh, just over representation in all of the in all of the positions of power in American society.

All right, but I we've been I've had this argument many times.

All right, the overrepresentation is not exclusive to Jews.

Jews are overrepresented, but so are other groups.

But if they're not a majority,

How can the hegemony be Jewish if they're not two things?

The majority of the people who are the faces of the hegemony are not Jews.

Secondly, the majority of Jews are not a part of the hegemony.

So how does the math work here that the hegemony is Jewish?

I'm just curious.

It's not that the entirety of the hegemony is Jewish.

It's not that the entirety of the power structure is Jewish.

That would be totally ridiculous and basically impossible just based on logistics.

It's about the character.

It's about the character and it's about the character of the hegemony, right?

You and I both agree that the character of the hegemony is Zionist.

And you proclaim this over and over again on your show.

You say this on Twitter.

And we are in complete agreement over that.

And I think you realize that.

But where we differ is that we would say that the character of the hegemony itself is Jewish.

Why?

Um because to say that it is Zionist and to dis distinguish that from the fact that it is Jewish is wrong.

Because if you if you look at um if you look at left-wing Jews, if you look at right-wing Jews, you'll notice that something that they agree on for the most part is Zionism.

And even with these left-wing Jews that are recently popping up, you can see that a lot of the counter-protest or a lot of the protests against Israel for Palestine have been orchestrated by Jews.

And you can see that even through this, they're able to control the narrative and they're able to control the way in which Israel is built.

Let's dial this back a little bit.

So I think you're saying two different things.

You're saying the majority of Jews are sympathetic to Zionism, and I think the facts show that this is the case in America.

We can get to the causes, but yeah, it's true.

But if I say the hegemony is Zionist, how does it square that that means it's Jewish just because Jews are sympathetic to Zionism?

I mean, it doesn't mean that because, for example, the majority of Americans are sympathetic to Zionism.

The majority of evangelicals are sympathetic to Zionism.

It doesn't square, logically speaking.

that people who are sympathetic to hegemony ideology are themselves the root of the hegemony.

All that tells me, for example, is that Jews in America grow up brainwashed

Into buying into the Zionist ideology.

And by the way, a lot goes into brainwashing them.

It doesn't come naturally to them.

A lot has to be done to brainwash them, to bring them on these birthright tours and kind of constantly pump them with falsehoods and propaganda.

I mean, they have to lie to these Jews.

American Jews, do you agree with this?

Do you agree American Jews from when they are born are being lied to about the reality in Palestine?

I think everyone is basically.

But aren't they especially being lied to and being told that Jews are fighting for their survival and they're trying to do another holiday?

They're being so lied to.

American Jews.

It's Jews for generations that have been lied to.

So if Zionism is naturally consequent from a Jewish character or a Jewish background, why do the Jews have to be lied to about the Zionism?

Why can't they just tell them the truth and be like, yeah, I mean, Israel's like slaughtering these people.

It's committing all these injustices, but it's in our ethnic self-interest to do it.

And might is right.

So yay, Israel.

I mean, they can't sell that to the...

You're saying that the character of Jews is not naturally this evil Zionist entity because they have to be brainwashed in the first place.

That's precisely the majority of Jews in America, like any other human being, believe in basic values of morality, of justice.

You know, of uh righteousness, they're human beings.

How to convince a human being to support the bestial and evil ideology of Zionism when it's and I feel like this is a Christian view.

You have to lie to masses of people, you can't tell them the truth because how could it be that it's in human nature for people to just naturally and spontaneously sign off on this stuff?

How could that be?

I don't, I really racial self-interest, it comes from racial self-interest.

The same way that you can mobilize black people if it's in their racial self-interest, why do they have to be lied to?

Why can't they just be told the truth in private and then have them be sign off on it?

Well, I don't think they're literally demons, right?

I mean, as much as we can characterize them and say stuff like that, I don't think they're literal demons.

I think they have some sort of a moral compass as other humans do.

But I think that they have a racial self-interest, maybe more so than other races.

The same way that you can mobilize blacks, for example, to act a certain way.

They've not acted this way forever, right?

You have to even over 100 years ago.

Here's the thing.

Even if Jews, you know, um, have each other's back when it comes to politics or whatever, like, let's not get into that.

For now, let's shelve that and table that.

Let's address the fact that the majority of Jews do not share in the power of the hegemony, and the majority of the people who are the face and make up the hegemony and pull the strings are not Jews.

So, how can we justify the equation?

How can we say the hegemony has a Jewish character?

Because Jewish people are inextricable from the current hegemony.

Our problem is not with hegemony itself.

Our problem is not an existing hegemony.

That's my problem with you.

Your problem is not with the actual hegemony.

It's with a specific detail about the hegemony.

Our problem is with this particular hegemony.

Our problem is not with hegemony.

Okay, but this particular hegemony, this particular hegemony, qualitatively speaking, is not mainly Jewish.

Zionism, just talking about Zionism.

Zionism which is informed by their Jewishness.

No.

Zionism is a detail within the ideology of the hegemony.

Zionism is a modern ideology which was created to solve, quote unquote, the Jewish question.

And it solves the Jewish question, quote unquote, according to the ideology of the hegemony that already existed before any kind of Jewish Zionist power or whatever.

So Zionism is the way the hegemony is resolving this religious conflict in Europe.

Among, by the way, among which there were many religious conflicts, the Protestants versus the Catholics being the principal one.

But there's also the conflict between the Orthodox and the Western Christian Catholics and Protestants.

So Europe has this internal religious problem, and it has this so-called Jewish question, the question of assimilation, the question of, you know, Jews are somehow outside of our society, yada, yada, yada.

So Zionism is the way that the people who pull the strings within the hegemony elected to resolve that problem.

So the ideology of Zionism.

uh is a hegemonic ideology, but it's not the the hegemony doesn't exist to serve Zionism.

Zionism is just part of that hegemony, specifically on the question of solving, quote unquote, the so called Jewish question.

So it needs to be very much clarified.

When I say the hegemony is Zionist, I'm not saying the cause of the hegemony is Zionism.

Zionism is a symptom of that deeper cause.

It's not itself the cause.

The cause, and this is where you have to put your thinking cap on and maybe read some books, the cause is the rule of a specific class, the rule of a specific class whose power and whose position is based on their control of the fundamentals of the resources that we need as societies in order to reproduce ourselves, that we depend on.

Our railways, our natural wealth, our factories, our infrastructure, all of these things that we need as a society is monopolized privately as private property.

And this system.

Underwent such an evolution that all of it got concentrated in the hands of what is effectively a cabal, the overwhelming majority of which is not Jewish.

So ask yourself this question, all right?

If this class is devising Zionism as the solution to the so-called Jewish question for economic reasons, for political, for historical reasons,

How can we say the hegemony is Jewish?

What is so Jewish about it?

Well, I just think it comes from a racial self-interest again, right?

I'm not saying that Jews are the only ones that are capable of developing this sort of hegemony.

I'm saying that the current hegemony is Jewish and characteristically it represents that in negative ways.

I wouldn't have a problem.

Okay, I want a direct logical sequence.

You say the hegemony is Jewish because it serves Jewish racial self-interest.

If that is true, why do Jews need to be lied about the nature of their own self-interest?

Can you answer that?

Well I don't think they're completely lied to.

I think they're lied to about some of the details, but the overarching point of it is that this is a racial self-interest and that this is a Jewish state and and to some extent that is true, right?

It's not a complete lie.

It is a Jewish state.

Okay, so they're not being lied to about the fact that

Well, put it this way.

Well, what is the lie?

I want to get into what you mean by that when you just say that.

The lie is this: that Israel is a correct response to thousands of years of Jewish persecution, and that it's only defending itself because it's under siege by all these people who hate Jews fundamentally because it's just like this ancient hatred of Jews.

And that actually, you know, Israel is not oppressing the Palestinians.

It's actually the Palestinians that are irrational, that are fanatics, that can't listen to reason.

And that all, you know, everyone gets to have a state.

Why can't we Jews have a state?

You know, these are the things they're being told.

And they're lies.

They're 100% of the time.

I think the latter is a lie, but not necessarily the former.

I mean, if you look at European history for the last 2,000 years, Jews were persecuted all throughout Europe.

Do you understand?

And so it provides this viable solution to the people who accuse the so-called dissident right of being Zionism because you concede all of the fundamental precepts of Zionism.

You concede an ancient struggle to just persecute the Jews just because they're Jews, and there's this ancient hatred, and this is a Jewish question that needs to be solved.

I mean, you wouldn't have to be able to do that.

There is an ancient, there is an ancient, there is an ancient fight between Christians and Jews.

Of course, it stems from 2,000 years ago.

I mean, they're not wrong about it.

Can I ask you a question?

What was that?

I I yeah, can I ask you something?

Yeah.

Why didn't that fight play out in Islamic lands?

Why only Islam?

Because Islam isn't as heavily involved in it.

Jews specifically lived in Europe.

That's not true.

I would be willing to bet the majority of the people.

Why only Ashkenazis?

Is it just about Jews or is it only about Ashkenazi Jews now?

So we can clarify.

Well, specifically, the ones in power are Ashkenazi Jews, right?

That's the power structure.

But why does it matter that they're Ashkenazi rather than just Jews in general, if it's a 2,000-year conflict?

Because I think the Ashkenazi.

Because I think their primary gripe is with Christians.

That's where their religion even stems from in the first place.

Okay, but under Islamic rule, Christians and Jews used to team up against the Muslims.

So how do you explain that?

Uh they must have had some sort of interest.

I mean Christians and Jews team up today against if there's this fundamental ancient enmity between them that is just insurmountable and insurpassable, why is it insurmountable?

I well technically it would be insurmountable if both if both sides were acting in good conscience by their religion, but it it is surmountable through money and power, right?

Hold on.

Why why are you saying that this is an ain uh so you don't think this is a fundamental conflict?

Well I do think it's a fundamental.

I think that it could be I think that it could be resolved through money and power and uh brainwashing.

You can solve it through brainwashing, to be clear.

Yeah, that's what's happened right now.

So you need to brainwash people to fix the problem of the conflict you're talking about?

Well, if there's this deep ideological conflict and you have to get the people that completely disagree with them from a theological basis, then yeah, you have to brainwash them to some capacity, to a large capacity.

Okay, hold on.

I I we're just kind of going in crazy directions.

To get this point better, you're saying that you concede the Zionist point that the world has it out for the Jews, to get the Jews, right?

That's your view.

Well, I think the world has it out for the Jews for the right reasons.

Yeah, but by the world you just mean Europe, right?

Christian the Christian world, right, the Western world.

But is Europe the only place where Christianity existed?

I'm talking about the Christian.

No, it's not the only place where Christianity existed.

So, West Christianity has this problem, this theological problem with Jews historically.

I agree.

But would you concede something else for me?

Do you think that the Christian world that you're talking about also had another problem, which is Christianity itself?

And what is Christianity?

How do you mean?

For example, the fact that there's a Hundred Years' War fought over Protestantism versus Catholicism.

And for example, the extermination of the Cathars in France.

That crusade.

The ab I forgot, I don't know how to say it.

You know what I'm talking about?

Uh, not particularly.

I'm not very well read up.

It was really big.

But let's just focus on Pro the Protestant Reformation.

Do you think that the Protestant Reformation is somehow just y something you can skip over in European history?

Uh no, but why is it relevant?

What do you think the cause of that was?

Uh ideological difference.

Okay.

Do you think it led to a lot of conflict?

Yep.

So, why are you making it seem like Jews are to blame when there's this problem Europe has with religion?

Even its own sects of Christianity it has, clearly, there's going to be religious Muslims were not even allowed in Europe.

People forget that.

They say, oh, Jews were expelled from all these countries in Europe.

Wait a second.

How is that surprising when they didn't even tolerate Muslims?

There was no religious tolerance in Europe.

They killed each other and fought each other over Protestantism, over the Cathars.

They killed each other over these things.

And they tolerated Jews sometimes.

Why were they insisting about tolerating Jews when they did not tolerate any Muslims in Europe?

I'm trying to say this isn't, it's not because Jews were bad guys or they were evil and the world had it out for them.

It's that Europe had a problem with religious tolerance in general.

That's why in Muslim lands, you didn't see that same pattern of, oh, there's a Jewish question and there's problems with Jews.

Because in Muslim lands, I'm not saying Islam is better than Christianity, but it's a matter of historical record.

Muslims had a better sense of religious tolerance than Christian Europeans did.

There was more of it, and there was more of an ability to be like able to tolerate.

Okay, these people disagree with me religiously, but I don't have to chop their head off over it.

There was just more religious diversity in the first place.

Okay, sure.

But religious diversity in Europe was always war.

It was always something that had to be fought over.

So why make it seem like this is a problem of Jews rather than European civilization itself?

Why not just be honest about the fact that there was something about European civilization which made this to be a source of conflict?

And you know why what I'm saying is not crazy?

Because all of the thinkers, the main thinkers the world to this day is indebted to from Europe, starting from the Italian Renaissance.

All of them conceded this point.

All of them were responding to this fact.

All of the thinkers of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment were concerned with the fact that

of the question of religion

Of

truth and reality and the ability to you know

uh maintain an independence and freedom of conscience.

Were they all Jews?

Was Immanuel Kant a Jew in your view?

Was uh Francis Bacon a Jew?

Was Thomas Hobbes a Jew?

Were these all Jews in your eyes?

This was a process within Europe itself of it having to come to terms with secularism.

Secularism, you know what that word means?

You don't like secularism, I imagine.

But the Jews did not invent secularism.

Secularism.

Was also not formed in response to Judaism.

Secularism was adopted in response to the amount of carnage and blood and chaos that was spilled because of the conflict between the Catholics and the Protestants.

And secularism was the product of that.

All European atheism, all the things you don't like about the Enlightenment, liberalism, humanism, they all arose from that context.

Did Jews try to get a piece of that and say, hey, you know, we were so expelled from society before, and this new Enlightenment liberalism is now giving us an opportunity to, you know, be part of society and not be excluded.

And of course, some of them were very enthusiastic about it.

But you know what you Groupers always ignore?

A lot of them were also very, very angry and upset about it.

You know, in our community, or not really in, just surrounding our community, an example of one of the Jews who hates the Enlightenment and who hates all this assimilation stuff and thinks it's the worst disaster ever?

Marr.

Marr is a Hasidic Jew.

That we know

And there are so many like him who share that outlook.

So just like Christians are divided over this, so are Jews.

Why this pathological hatred of Jews?

Where does it come from?

Okay, well, there's a lot to unpack there.

You're saying that the Protestants had their gripes with the Catholics, and there was a lot of ethnic warfare, a lot of religious warfare between them.

I'm saying, stop coping.

Stop looking for a scapegoat.

Something was wrong with Europe that led it down the path it went.

You can't just say, oh, Jews were the problem.

Something was wrong with Europe.

And you have to be responsible for it.

Not be responsible for it.

Acknowledge it.

Think about it.

Because there's thinkers who came before you that thought about it.

The thinkers that you ignore, I mean, you just turn on your TV, you watch Nick Fuentes or something.

Open and read a book.

Read these actual quite pure Aryan European thinkers of the Enlightenment and read what they said about these things.

Because they did talk about it.

They did talk about.

This problem of religious dogmatism and you know skepticism.

Is this the truth?

What is the truth?

They inquired upon these things.

They tried to think through them, culminating in Hegel, right?

Have you ever read any of them?

Have you read Kant?

Immanuel Kant?

No, I haven't read Kant.

How can you make any fundamental claims about the nature of European civilization and make all these huge and bold claims about the Jews and the Christians when you haven't even read the basics of European civilization as it exists today, formed today?

Where are you getting your information?

Where are you getting that education?

Are you just listening to what Nick Fuentes says?

And then just says, yes.

But why not read books too?

Well I have been reading books.

Just I need to get into it more.

Right now I'm reading a Spanish Civil War book.

I need to get into philosophy.

Is that relevant to what I'm saying?

Why not think through on an independent basis and an independent level?

Think through what you're actually saying.

You're saying that hegemony is Jewish.

Based on what?

You're saying racial self-interest.

There's so much.

Based on the character of it.

Based on the character, based on what it purports.

How?

Based on its influence on society.

Sure, but how?

Let's make that more concrete.

How?

Well to me, Zionism and and Juda and Jews are inextricable from one another.

Even if that was true.

So we're kind of just going in circles now.

No, no, no, no, we're going in circles because even if even if they were interrelated, clearly they're not the same thing because Judaism predates Zionism.

So if the hege how is the hegemony characteristically Jewish?

How is it characteristically Jewish?

Because it provides for the Jewish self-interest, right?

When you have this pluralistic, multi-ethnic Western system, it provides a safety for Jews.

You can even see Jews write about this.

I know it's kind of a triton.

Does it provide just out of curiosity?

Does that provide safety for Hindus as well, Brahmins, Indians?

Probably.

Oh, interesting.

What about like Buddhists and Asians?

Sure.

Provides safety for every for every non-white minority group.

What okay, let me ask you another question.

Uh, what about Catholics in a Protestant majority country?

Does it provide safety for them too?

Pluralism?

Yeah.

Um, well, you'd have to talk about it on a net scale.

I don't think it would.

On some level, some sort of religious tolerance.

Religious pluralism was in the founding of this country, and without it, the Catholics would have all been killed.

No, I do think religious pluralism brings some sort of safety for Catholics and Protestants living in a yeah, right.

So if there's Catholics living in a majority Protestant nation,

Sure.

So, how are you going to frame this as a conflict between Christians and Jews when the Christians don't even have their own act together?

Think about that.

What do you mean the Christians don't have their act?

You say I want this country together.

I think the Protestants don't have their act together.

It's not a good idea.

But when you and your leaders say America must be a Christian country, it's not that.

Okay, so you mean Catholic.

So how are you going to impose...

See, you Catholics, in the eyes of WASPs, you Catholics are the same as Jews.

They don't see you as any different.

I don't know if they see the same as Jews.

I don't see them the same as Jews.

You are the same as a racial foreigner and an alien presence in the eyes of Wasps.

You're the same as Jesus.

Not as much as whites.

Are you talking about the evangelical types or are you talking about the good faith types?

I am talking about the Jackson type of Wasps.

They see you Catholics as no different than Jews.

Yeah, we tolerate you because we have pluralism and that's it.

Otherwise, we wouldn't because we don't like the popery.

That's their view.

They don't see you as different.

I don't know how to break this to you.

You Catholics in the American context are seen as spicy and exotic.

You're not.

You're not like considered to be, you know, the the pure Aryan race.

This is why it's so bizarre to me.

And the majority of the Catholic presence in this country is from Mexico.

So what are we even talking about?

And before that southern Italy and or Southern Europe, Italy and then And they were considered brown.

They were all considered non-white.

Right, so it comes from that.

It comes from that and the Mexicans.

I understand.

Right.

So what I'm trying to say is.

I don't think it's on the level of Jews.

I think that's just wrong.

Why not?

Why not?

I mean, how do I even justify this?

The KKK literally used to group Catholics and Jews together.

If the KKK had the chance to kill a Catholic or a Jew, they're killing the Jew.

I don't think they distinguished them.

I think they did.

Really?

You're going to die on that hill?

You're going to die on that hill.

If you gave them a choice between a Catholic and a Jew, they would kill the Jew.

They killed the Jew of all the people.

You have to understand the KKK preceded the huge waves of German immigration.

Like the German-American Bund, yeah, they would rather kill a Jew.

But the KKK were this nativist WASP group that hated all the new immigrants in general.

Well, they also hated black slaves.

And they considered the Catholics to be the number one source of conspiratorial intrigue from Rome.

They saw Rome as an octopus trying to conquer the world and infiltrate and subvert America.

That was their view.

Read them.

Sure, maybe they believe that.

It doesn't matter.

They're wrong.

I mean, I don't understand.

Like, is your argument that because religious people otherize other religious groups that we can't do the same for Jews?

The character of Jews.

Who is we?

Who is we?

Who is we?

Catholics.

We as Catholics, people hold out.

You are not the only or the original religious group in America.

I understand.

I understand.

But now that we have a pluralistic, multi-ethnic, multi-religious society, we can come together Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox Christians, maybe even Muslims, and decide that.

And decide that the current people are.

And everyone agree that they don't like Jews.

Right.

Well, because the current power structure, the hegemony, as you're saying, characteristically Zionist.

Yeah, it's going to be like Suleiman and Sneko and Nick Fox.

I get what you're saying.

It already is.

It already is.

We're going to bring these people from Britain and these Pakistanis from Britain.

I mean, you could be one of them too.

You could be the Lebanese guy, but you don't want to.

You're right.

I don't want to.

Because here's the issue, all right?

For a time, that will be fine.

You'll all be united and whatever.

You just, oh, the Jews are the only enemy.

Let's be united against the Jews.

But even before you defeat, so-called defeat the Jews, like what you want.

You don't have a viable or strong foundation for unity.

Just agreeing that you don't like Jews is not enough.

And you'll see that going down the line.

And I've seen it and I've witnessed it with my own eyes, two eyes, seeing how much cracks and divisions happen with that America First movement all the time.

Because just hating J forget America First Movement, all of the alt-right splintered in a million pieces, and they all agreed they didn't like Jews, and they splintered in a million pieces still.

Because it's not enough to have a scapegoat and say this is our common enemy.

We're going to fight against them and be unified.

No, no, no.

Why are they your common enemy?

For example, a Muslim may say, Well, I just don't like what Israel is doing, right?

A Protestant may say, Maybe I don't like Jews, but I don't like them for the same reasons I don't like Catholics.

I mean, how do you establish a qualitative unity based on a shared hatred for the same group when the reasons for that hatred are so different and they're so distinct?

It's a tenuous and weak unity, it's a false unity, and it will shatter and break in a million pieces at the first sign of adversity, and that's the problem.

Well, sure.

If it's if it's equally distributed, yeah, but if there's a majority group within that, I don't think it will.

And even if it does, if there's a majority group within that, it wouldn't even matter, right?

Because Catholics can only be the majority in this country through Mexicans.

That's it.

So you want a white Catholic movement.

White Catholics are a small minority in this country.

You are not going to bring the wasps, the brown people, the black people all to heel and conquer all of them.

You're not going to do it, I promise.

And still have this be a unified America.

You're talking about Balkanization, and you what you're talking about is incompatible with the purport of America.

Logistics like that don't work with American Christians, right?

Because what you have with American Christians is a latent force.

You have non-practicing Christians who are only Christian in name.

And if you're going to revitalize them, we're completely capable of revitalizing these so-called Protestants into a Catholic movement.

Until they become disillusioned with it for the same reason their fathers and why would they become disillusioned?

That's a separate, that's kind of a because Protestantism is not just confessional, it's a sociological and historical form of ancestry.

And Protestant culture and the Protestant religion go far deeper than the surface level, oh, I'm just religious, I'm not religious.

Just like Catholicism is a historically constituted religious group, meaning someone can be like an atheist, but if they come from a Catholic background, there's going to be clear sociological and cultural patterns that they align with just because of the Catholic background.

So the same is true for Protestants.

There is a Protestant aspect of America that cannot be ignored.

You can't just skip over it and be like, can't you just incorporate that into the Catholic movement?

I don't understand why you can't do that.

If the Pope couldn't do it for 500 years in Europe, I don't know how you're going to do it in America without a Pope on your side.

Well, here's the thing: because the Protestants aren't, they aren't, they are mobilized.

The Protestants are a latent force.

So, if you mobilize them through this Catholic movement, then I think it's completely acceptable to I need to break the news to you because you're really just in denial about this.

You're a sectarian, you're a sectarian.

Any other religious fanatic would be saying the same thing you are, and they think they're right.

And you're a sectarian.

My parents come from a country called Lebanon.

I know what sectarianism is, and all it leads to is a bunch of different groups killing each other and destroying their nation and dividing it.

What you are saying, your inability to recognize other religions that are contrary to your own beliefs invalidates the purport of the United States of America as a unified nation.

At best,

What you're talking about would lead to a scenario of balkanizing the country into a bunch of different enclaves.

Nothing would unify this country.

Nothing could unify this country.

I don't know.

Honestly, I'm not a LARPer, okay?

Well, I don't think that we're just going to have this crazy Catholic thing and then take over the world.

But I don't I don't I'm not completely blackpilled is what I'm saying.

I don't think that it's completely impossible to incorporate Protestants into a Catholic movement.

But okay, you you you you may not find that unrealistic.

Um but the Protestants disagree with you.

And that's the issue.

Most of the Protestants aren't even Protestants.

They're not consciously Protestant.

But trust me when I say the that unconscious is there and it's a whole lot to say.

I understand what you're trying to say.

Yeah, yeah.

So so look, h here's my view, you know.

My view is that if we believe in uh freeing America and restoring American sovereignty from the hegemony, which I think we've both agreed is not characteristically Jewish,

If we are interested in that, we need to acknowledge that America is a nation with multiple different religions and multiple different uh ethnicities and races.

And that ethno-nationalism

And Catholic nationalism or Protestant nationalism, whatever you want to call it, is incompatible with the purport of this country as a unified nation, of one people, one country.

So what is so wrong with that?

What is wrong with the vision of one American people, one American nation and one American country?

What is so wrong with that?

What is so wrong with the view that we must become one people?

And and you mean like a pluralist people, a pluralist civic nationalist?

but to f form into one distinct people

in a way that fundamentally transcends any of the racial or historical or sociological uh peoples that were formed in the old world.

And by sociological you mean religious?

No.

Not necessarily.

So so you're saying so then w how does that tie into religion?

Because I'm saying that we need one majority religion and then I guess you're I thought you were trying to tell me that you would accept some sort of pluralistic American creedal civic nationalism, but I I don't understand what you're trying to say now.

I'm talking about racially.

Right.

No, I agree with you somewhat.

I mean I I don't think it's possible to have like a white nation.

I think America is a majority Christian country, but I think the inability to agree on what that Christianity is makes it impossible for a theocracy to ever exist here.

Because it's not just Protestants.

This is something you may be overlooking.

The Protestants are not unified, as I'm sure you know.

How many Protestant sects are in America?

There's the Mormons, there's the Baptists, there's the Episcopals, there's the you name it, and they all disagree.

Well, they're unified in some way, they don't really beef with each other.

I disagree.

How are Mormons unified with Episcopals?

Well, Mormons, well, Mormons, I wouldn't really call them Protestants.

Protestants wouldn't call them Protestants.

Maybe I would.

What are they then?

I don't know, to be honest.

They're just a weird branch.

That's what they say about Catholicism.

Yeah, so they view Mormons in a similar way that they view Catholics.

Why see, y y y you're fixated on the question what should the majority religion be in this country?

Rather than ask yourself the question, according to my understanding of religion, ask yourself this question, according to my understanding of religion.

And the basis of religious belief and religious conviction, and the fundamentals of what compels me to identify with this religion, and what it teaches me.

How should I respond?

To the historical situation being thrown before me right here and right now.

What does the Bible tell you?

What wisdom have you gotten from your own religion about how to respond to the current situation in America?

We keep fighting, I guess.

I don't really have a response to that.

Because I don't think the Bible tells you that the world would be a paradise if not for the Jews.

I don't think that's what the message of Christianity is.

Well, the message of Christianity is that the world sucks, right?

But that we have to work to try and make it better.

Okay, well, it's kind of critical.

Sure.

That may be the case.

But make that concrete in America.

How will you make America better?

By electing Catholics into power, putting Catholics in positions of influence.

So all they have to do is call themselves Catholic.

It doesn't matter what they do or what they propose.

Well, they have to be Catholic.

They have to be Catholic.

But it doesn't matter what their actual goal is, because Joe Biden's a Catholic.

I don't know if you knew that.

Well, they have to implement Catholic policies, obviously, right?

What is a Catholic policy?

Uh total ban on abortion.

Okay, what else?

Um making sodomy illegal.

Blasphemy laws.

Why don't we just talk about abortion?

I like that one.

Abortion compels people to get abortions in this country.

Selfishness.

Okay.

Apathy.

Why would anyone want to do that, though?

Why would anyone want to get an abortion?

Um, because it's an inconvenience for them to have the baby.

Why?

Uh either financially or in terms of their time, women want to pursue careers.

Okay, so there's two things.

Why do they want to pursue careers though?

Because they're educated to believe that it's a good thing, they want to.

What do you mean, why?

Like, you want me to give you like a deeper answer?

Why is having a child incompatible with their careers?

It's not necessarily incompatible, but it takes time away.

They want to dedicate all their time.

Well, kind of.

If they want to dedicate all their time to their career, which some of them do, uh, they want to get the abortion because if they take the if they keep the child, they can't do that.

And why not?

And why can't they do that?

Because it takes up their time.

Yeah.

So you're saying that would make them less likely to be able to be successful in their careers, right?

Yes, yeah.

I agree, that's that's the current reality.

But two things.

Has it ever occurred to you that there's a reason why there's so much financial trouble plaguing the people of this country that they can't even have kids anymore?

Has it ever occurred to you that there's a reason

why women can't simultaneously be mothers and pursue their dreams and their careers at the same time, because there's no incentive for these companies to actually recognize the nature of women, the fact that they have children, and give them the maternity leave that they need.

Has ha do these things matter to you?

Are they material to you?

Or is it just the sin that's material to you?

Are the causes of the sin material to you, or is it just the sin?

Me, I don't think they should be working at all.

I mean, you know this.

How will they eat?

Uh because their husband will provide.

That's the economy.

With what job that will pay for two people in one house.

Right, I think the economic system's broken as well.

We agree on that.

So why don't you begin with that?

Why do you begin only with the sin and not the cause?

Doesn't that make you a Pharisee and a hypocrite?

How do you mean?

If you're only focusing on the superficial sin while simultaneously doing little or no.

Superficial, it's murder, right?

These are innocent lives that are being lost.

If you are turning a blind eye and neglecting the root cause of that, doesn't it?

I don't turn a blind eye to it.

I don't turn a blind eye.

I think they're both problems.

But you only focus on one and not the other.

Well, one is more agree.

I don't only focus on one and not the other.

I have more focus on one of them because it's like the egregious act itself.

Why do you have more focus on that?

Are you forgiving them?

Wasn't Jesus preaching forgiveness?

Well, of course I forgive everyone for anything that anyone's done.

But what does it mean concretely to forgive them?

Think about that.

To really forgive them means to understand why they have been put in that situation by an insurmountable and inescapable debt imposed upon them, both literally and figuratively.

I find to make a living.

Of course I understand their situation.

But why don't you focus on that?

Why don't you understand that as what's fundamental?

Why can't you forgive their sin and go for the root cause of the sin?

Why don't you battle the serpent in his cave?

Why do you focus on the sin?

Only on the symptoms.

Why don't you actually step on that snake like the Virgin Mary?

Well, I think the actual snake is the apathy.

The people don't care anymore.

No, I think the snake is your apathy.

Young men, who are the ones who have a responsibility to challenge the real elites and the hegemony, to stand up for your people, to stand up for your sisters, to stand up for your mothers, to stand up for the innocent, good people of this country, and wrestle and fight.

with the actual ruling class.

Wrestle and fight for the actual justice that is necessary to bring dignity to the people of this country so that sin will not be the norm, so that the aroma of sin will be eliminated, so that the actual root cause and source of these sins you don't like aren't so normalized.

Why have you neglected your responsibility to do that?

Do you think it's brave to just focus on talking about Jews, Jews, Jews?

Well, okay, now we're kind of diverting to that.

But here's what I want to tell you, right?

The Bible tells us over and over again, since we're appealing to it, that the world is a fallen and broken place, right?

And so if you're highlighting this misfortune in the world where the economic system is broken and women are incentivized to do this horrible evil, then we are focusing on the fact that the world is evil.

Of course it is, right?

That is abundantly clear in the Bible.

Hold on, let me just finish this.

The point is that despite the world being awful and a terrible place, which incentivizes evil over good, the choice still has to be made.

There cannot be an apathy to just commit the evil because it's convenient.

You have to do what's inconvenient, the hard thing to do, what society does not incentivize, what does not grant you the world, but what will grant you a place in heaven.

That's the essence of Christianity.

You have missed the entire point, my friend.

The world may be evil, but you are responsible for that evil.

You bear responsibility for it.

You are culpable of it.

And by neglecting that culpability, by ignoring precisely how you're responsible for it, you're being a hypocrite.

You're crucifying people on the cross of the sins they commit without recognizing your own culpability.

And how are you culpable?

You're culpable by the culpability you have in the system, the factory of sin, the machine that reproduces sin.

I agree that I am culpable.

Until you can stand up about that, until you can stand up for the weak and stand up for the vulnerable and stand up for the people who don't have their own voice, you are culpable.

And by attacking them and looking down at them and their sins, you are being a...

We all recognize that.

No, we all recognize that we're all culpable.

It's the essence of Christianity.

But you think that culpability...

Can be addressed how?

How can you take responsibility for it?

Repenting, going to confession, and putting your hands together and praying.

Is that really the message that Jesus Christ came to this earth to give humanity?

That just saying some words is all you need to do?

What about how you actually what about how you actually participate in this life and in this world?

What about what you actually do?

What about the things you actually do?

Not just the things you say, not just the the words you confess, what about your actions?

What about the way in which you respond to the reality that we all bear culpability in forming and creating?

How do you respond to the fundamental reality?

Of the reign of the serpent, how are you responding to that?

Because it sounds like you're just responding to it by saying people aren't praying hard enough or reciting the right words.

People are committing evil.

People don't care about committing evil.

People care about what's doing what's convenient to do.

I agree.

I agree.

Right.

But would you also agree that they're committing evil while simultaneously calling themselves Catholics and Christians and saying that they're doing it in the service of the Lord?

I bet you're right.

I'm sure a lot of people are.

What about these evangelicals on TV?

Do you think they're duping their audiences?

A lot of them probably are.

Let me ask you a question: Is racial hatred Christian?

I don't think any hatred is Christian.

Do you think?

Do you think it's Christian to say that some groups are less human than others?

Uh no, I would not say that.

Do you think that your movement does that or no?

Our movement, or are you talking about like Nick Fuentes or Broipers in general?

Yeah, in general, whatever.

I mean some groipers probably do, yeah.

Do you believe that uh Africans cannot produce civilizations?

Uh I don't believe they can produce uh advanced civilization on their own, no.

Great, great.

What do you think it is that separates us as human beings from animals?

Um our souls.

Okay.

What is the source of our ability to produce advanced civilizations?

Uh intelligence.

Intelligence, um, I don't know, cognitive biology.

Does that have anything to do with the soul or no?

I don't think biology has to do with the soul, it's a very materialist perspective.

You don't think intelligence is related to the soul?

That's a big one to unpack.

Yeah, do you think that Catholic theology agrees with you on that?

That the soul is unrelated to the mind and intelligence.

I didn't say it's unrelated, I'm saying that the soul is something beyond the mind and intelligence, it's given by God.

I agree, but isn't our capacity to produce advanced civilizations also given by God?

Or is it just an algorithm?

Or are you a ruthless, vulgar Darwinian materialist for everything except this claim that what?

What exactly does our soul allow us to do?

Well, here's a problem with that, right?

You go down a dangerous path because you're positing that inequality is some sort of evil, and that if we are created beings by a just and loving God, then we must all be equal in some way.

And that just ignores the fact that inequality is abundant throughout human life, even if there is racial inequality between the people.

But what does the soul give humans the ability to do?

What's the significance?

It makes us like God.

It makes us in the image of God.

How?

I mean, I don't know how I can really explain that.

You'd probably have to talk to a theologian on that.

Like, a human has a soul, an animal doesn't have a soul.

Okay, what distinguishes a human being?

How do we know they have a soul?

Uh we can reason, right?

That's the

Interesting.

So we have the ability to reason.

So the ability to reason comes from the fact that we have a soul.

Uh, it comes from the fact that we were created to be in God's image.

So that is the thing that makes us different from animals, correct?

Yes.

And intelligence, does that have anything to do with being able to reason?

Hello?

Hello?

Hello?

Did I did I cut out?

Alright.

Um did I did I cut out when I was speaking or was it when you were speaking?

I asked the question and then you cut out.

Uh, could you just ask it again?

Does intelligence have anything to do with the ability to reason?

Yeah, it does.

Okay.

So it's our soul that is the reason we have intelligence, correct?

Um not necessarily.

God is the reason we have a soul, but God is also the reason we are able to reason.

I don't I don't think the ability to reason gives man the ability to reason.

Correct?

I said God gave man the ability to reason.

So, what does the soul give us?

What is the soul?

What is the character of our soul?

What does that mean?

I'm not sure, honestly.

You'd have to talk to a theologian on that.

It's not me trying to dodge.

I genuinely don't think that's a good idea.

But I think what they'll tell you is that a soul, for example, allows us to have a will.

Is that fair?

Uh yes, yeah, sure.

Okay.

And what is a will?

The ability to make choices, correct?

Right, free will, yeah.

And the ability to make choices is dependent upon what?

The ability to recognize differences, correct?

Different outcomes and different possibilities.

It's dependent on that as one of the aspects, yes.

But primarily, that's how you would summarize it, right?

Like, we can make choices because we can recognize distinctions within reality and within the possibilities of what we ourselves can do, correct?

Well, it's a prerequisite to making choices, but we also need volition, right?

I mean, the determinist would argue that you have the illusion of making choices.

Without distinction, there's no volition in question because there's no distinction.

There's no possible difference.

Well, you can have distinction, but you can be a determinist and also believe in distinction.

That's fine.

But you agree that when we're talking about choice,

We're talking about the ability

to recognize differences in reality, correct?

Um for yeah, there are two possible outcomes, and you choose one through your own will.

But the will is something that's not.

Do you say that would be the same as being able to render inta uh reality intelligible?

What isn't what is what is the nature of int render the intelligibles?

What is something what does it mean for something to be intelligible?

What does that mean?

You can understand it.

Okay.

What but what does it mean for things to have intelligibility?

Like, if I understand this, what does that mean?

I understand this in contrast to that, correct?

Um I guess you could morally distinguish the two.

So that is the root word of intelligence, by the way.

That's what intelligence means, that you have the ability to make differences intelligible.

You can make more things intelligible.

That's what intelligence means.

You are saying that you think Africans have less of a soul than Europeans.

When you say they're less intelligent, that's what you're saying.

There's no unbiased, pure biological notion of intelligence, which is just, oh, it's just like a computer where you're upgrading the G-Force RTX 4090.

That's not what intelligence is.

Intelligence is not a computer.

You're not just saying some innocuous, oh, they're just less intelligence.

You know, they can't do as much.

You are saying at the fundamental level of what makes them human, they are lesser than Europeans.

That's what you're saying.

Why don't you just own up to what you're saying and admit that?

Well, I don't think it's like that because if you say that, then you have to say that Down syndrome people do not have the same souls as normal people.

And I disagree with that.

But even a Catholic would be forced to admit that Down syndrome people is a tragedy that happens within families and within communities, but there cannot be a people, there couldn't be an entire shepherd.

The body of Christ cannot be made up primarily of a church cannot be primarily made up of people with Down syndrome.

I mean, I don't know what that would look I mean, that's a ridiculous question.

People with Down syndrome could not constitute a people.

They couldn't constitute a people.

You would agree with that, right?

They're exceptions within uh a group of people.

Sure, but they don't meet the terms.

Africans, different groups in Africa, that is different peoples.

They are a form, a distinct form of humanity.

They're not an exception within a group, like a tragic disability or aberration or something.

That is a unique form of the existence of humanity, of creation.

And you are saying that at the fundamental level of what makes them human, they are lesser.

And that's your view.

Well, I don't think so.

I think you're I think you're making ability to reason as Europeans?

Uh no.

Okay, but you defined the soul

In terms of what it can do is an ability to reason.

So they're talking about val you're we're talk are we talking about values of souls?

That's what we're talking about, correct?

No, we are talking about the nature of the soul.

Sure, but but but you are giving some sort of evaluation to the souls, right?

You're talking about how the l how you think that we believe.

If we understand the soul in terms of an ability to reason, logically it makes sense that variations in your inherent fundamental ability to reason, especially as a people, not just as different individuals, but as a whole people, as a distinct form of the existence of humanity.

that you are talking about some souls are lesser and some souls are more.

Uh no.

No, that's not because to me a soul is not less is lesser if it is in less va if if it is of less value to God, right?

And and all souls are of equal value to God, so th souls cannot be lesser or greater than God.

How do you know if a people have a soul?

For example, what preempts you from just saying they're not even human and they're not even the audience for Christ's message?

What preempts you from saying that?

That's interesting, actually.

I don't know.

Again, I don't know what the distinction would lie, where the distinction would lie for that.

Why can't you just admit that the notion of racial superiority or inferiority for that matter is inherently antithetical to the Christian outlook?

That Christ's message was for all of humanity, which knew no distinction between Greek nor Jew, which didn't say any group was better than anyone else, and that everyone is God's children, and no one is more human than the other, and nobody is more able to build advanced civilizations than the other, or these other bizarre, vulgar, materialist categories you're giving us.

See, Keith Woods isn't even really a Christian, I don't think.

So he can give valuation.

But why can't you admit it?

I don't think we can give valuations to souls based on how how good they are able to reason.

I don't simply valuation of the soul, it's the presence of the soul.

Do they have a soul?

Or to what extent do they have a soul?

Because you are saying the thing that makes them human, they're lesser on that account.

That's what you're saying.

And you're not getting canceled.

This is kick, it's free speech.

But ju why don't you have the courage to just admit there's this fundamental contradiction in your world view?

Well, I think some people maybe have fuller souls.

I don't know what the right semantic word to say is that.

Europeans have fuller souls.

Probably.

I don't know.

I mean, they're more developed for sure.

I mean, they have more ability to do that.

So do you think this is something Jesus Christ would say?

That, oh, yeah, the people who have lighter skin have fuller souls.

Does it sound very Christ-like to say, or just what?

I don't know if he'd say it.

He never really talked about biological differences between people.

It wasn't really a topic of his.

But I mean, would he agree with it?

I don't know, probably, because it's true.

He wouldn't lie.

You think Jesus Christ believed that Europeans have fuller souls than Africans?

Or he would agree?

I don't know the semantic word choice that he would choose, but I don't think he would disagree with biological choice.

Europeans have fuller souls than Africans.

In Jesus' time, he was living in what's called Palestine today, right?

To his north were the Romans, to their north were the barbarian Gauls and Germanics.

Who were even more European than the Romans?

Jesus was a contemporary of Egyptians.

He was a contemporary of the various Semites, of Phoenicians, of whatever you want to call it, because of the place he lived.

Those differences you're talking about should have been observable to him.

Why didn't the Bible talk about this hierarchy of races and people?

Because there were important hierarchies are intrinsically true.

They don't need to be a hierarchy between different races and groups.

Because when Jesus did talk about it, he says, I know no distinction between Greek nor Jew.

And these are what he says.

But there is actually a distinction between Greek.

But why didn't he say Europeans are destined to have fuller souls and be superior to everyone?

But here's the thing about it.

And it's so true, and it's so correct, and it's the fundamental bedrock and foundation for a political system and everything.

Shouldn't it have been able to account for that and at least give us a hint that this would be the case?

But exactly in that verse lies the problem, right?

In that verse, it says, There is no Greek nor Jew.

And that is factually, biologically not true, right?

There are Greeks and there are Jews.

They are biologically distinct.

But the importance of that verse is that those differences do not matter to God.

The importance of that verse is that before God, there was no Greek nor Jew, nor man, nor woman.

You're saying that this racial hierarchy doesn't matter to God, right?

No.

So why does it matter to you?

Because it has real-world impacts.

So, you don't think God cares about the real world?

And it's impacting.

Of course, he does.

Of course, he does.

But he says over and over again that the real world is nothing.

He's a part of the kingdom of heaven.

That your whole political outlook and all these views you have are on behalf of what God wants and what God thinks.

So if it doesn't matter to God, why does it matter to you?

I'm not saying that immigration is something that matters to God.

That's separate.

You don't think it matters to God, then why do you care about it?

Because these things affect the world.

Well, here's the thing.

I to say specifically in immigration in of itself, people moving to a different country, people of a different race moving to a different country, I don't even have anything against.

It actually changes the demographic composition of the nation.

It changes the character of the nation, which would matter to God because it would make the country more inhospitable.

Okay, so so immigration does matter to God.

Not di not directly in of itself.

The effects of it do, yes.

And racial supremacy matters to God?

Ra I don't believe in racial supremacy.

Or racial hierarchies matter to God?

Um no, I don't think so.

So why do they matter to you?

Why do you acknowledge them?

If God see, if they matter, why does the body impacts on the world which matter to God?

So it doesn't matter to God or it does matter to God.

I mean, we're going in circles here.

Those differences in of themselves do not matter to God, but they have impacts on the world which probably do matter to God.

So, why didn't the Bible warn us about them?

Why didn't the Bible say, like, for example, listen, my flock, be prepared?

Doesn't the Bible talk about company?

Doesn't the Bible talk about keeping bad company?

That's a little bit of a stretch to say that some race superiors.

Well, here's the thing, though.

We're talking about society at large, right?

And if you're importing people that bring a bad character to the nation, then it creates bad company for the entire nation.

Let's not talk about it for a second.

Because you know, it's just immigration.

The issue is when Nick Fuentes told me personally that he believes that Europeans should go to Africa and subjugate all the Africans and impose their will upon them because the Europeans are inherently better.

It would be better for them.

It would give them better lives.

Which I think matters to God.

That's why we think about it.

Yeah, you're not supposed to be able to do that.

You are more entitled to recite the message of God than they are because you're better.

You're more entitled to God.

It's not about reciting a message.

It's about providing that Jesus is because we're charitable.

You being charitable.

Yeah, because you're being charitable because these Africans, according to you, cannot digest God's message as well as Europeans can.

It's not about digesting a message.

It's simply about advanced civilizations.

It's a hurdle.

Where do you think?

Okay, so where do you think the ability to create advanced civilizations comes from?

intellect, biological differences.

Which is not the soul.

No, even though the soul is exclusively defined by the intellect and the capacity for intellect, in your view, again, it depends on how you ontologically define the soul.

That's a whole can of worms.

Well, you should probably think for a second what the soul means before you make such a ridiculous claim.

You're a Catholic theocrat.

You have to understand completely the entirety of reactionary.

You're a reactionary Catholic theocrat, and you know, oh, secularism and all this stuff is a disaster, but you're just kind of winking on the side.

Oh, yeah, like this vulgar biological materialism, totally correct.

That's a side thing.

That's not related.

That's like a side thing, dude.

That's on the side.

No, no, no.

You are a Catholic integralist.

So integrate everything into one cohesive worldview.

How do you reconcile your vulgar British Darwinism with Catholic theology?

That's what I want to hear.

That's just a mischaracterization.

You are a vulgar, uh racial, uh, biological determinist, materialist.

But s how is that compatible with Catholic theology?

I don't understand.

Is analyzing the temporal material world wrong now?

Is that not Catholic?

Is it making is making you're not just analyzing the temporal world, you are analyzing the fundamentals of what makes someone human.

That's no, no, that's what it is.

The ability to make advanced civilizations is what distinguishes us from animals.

And that is what you are creating.

Or the ability to reason when it comes to different historically constituted peoples.

Right.

Okay, so you're saying that, okay, but that's not necessarily how it works, right?

I'm saying that, well, Catholics and Christians believe that the humans are distinct from animals because we have the ability to reason.

And sure, some people have a greater ability than other people, but that doesn't mean that, no, that's not how that works.

That's not how you there's got to be some word for what fallacy that is.

Because I don't know it off the top of my head.

I'm not getting that.

It seems like you're saying.

We're distinct from animals based on our ability to reason.

Therefore, Africa in your view, you think Africans are less able to reason as Europeans.

So you're saying that they're less human.

No, that's not what I'm saying.

That's not how that works.

Why not?

Because that's just that's just not how it works.

I mean, it's because it's because it causes cognitive dissonance in you or because it's not a logical consequence of what you're saying.

No, just the ability to reason in of itself distinguishes humans from animals.

And Africans have the ability to reason.

They might have an inferior ability to reason, but they are still human.

So they're inferior at being human.

Uh I mean I guess, I don't know.

There you go.

So you're saying the same thing I'm accusing you of saying.

But they're still human.

It doesn't matter if they're inferior to human.

They're still inferior to being human compared to human beings.

I didn't say you're accusing them of not being human at all.

I'm saying you're accusing them of being less human than you are.

Uh not necessarily.

Yeah, necessarily.

There's a spectrum of humanity in your view, and they're less on the spectrum.

Uh I don't think humanity is a spectrum.

I think it's a standard that we can fail to reach.

You are saying they are less at they are worse at being human than I am.

Or reach completely, that is.

Listen, there are clear in terms of in terms of intelligence, they might be worse at being human than I am, sure.

But intelligence is what distinguishes us from animals, right?

The ability to reason, which has to do with intelligence, so somewhat.

What's the difference?

Um again, I'm not sure you have to talk to a theologian on that.

No, there isn't.

I the theologian will say the same thing.

So you don't want to acknowledge the logical consequences of your world view because they're inherently contradictory.

And that's the problem.

See, me, this is the difference between us.

And I'm not saying this to demean you, I'm saying it to inspire you.

The difference between us.

Well, how old are you?

Uh do I have I don't wanna age docs.

Okay, what about a ballpark?

Are you a teenager?

Yeah.

Okay.

This is an eighteen and up discord, did you know that?

Uh I'm eighteen in a few months.

I just age docs, whatever.

All right.

Well, I've tried to help you, and hopefully you grow up.

And the last word of advice.

Well, I will grow up.

That's inevitable.

My last word of advice to you is this, all right?

When I was your age.

I could not live with contradictions, fundamental contradictions, cognitive dissonance in my outlook that were, and not just contradictions, but more specifically, an inability to be reconciled with the consequences of my beliefs.

That would have bothered me.

I couldn't just turn on some guy on the internet and say, oh yeah, he's.

I actually had to think through it independently and be confident in what I believed.

I pray.

I pray you could be led down the path of independent thought so that you could actually be confident and more certain in your convictions about the nature of reality.

So that you won't be scammed and abused and led along in some nonsense cult that is inevitably going to fail.

Now, go to bed because you probably have school tomorrow.

And Maude's banned because he's underage.

I

Anyway.

Look.

It's not rocket science.

Not rocket science, all right?

Um

You can't claim to be a Christian.

If you're just trying to smuggle in neo-Nazism, because that's what's going on.

That's what's going on with these new right-wingers.

They understand how compelling religion is, how much in people's heart religious belief is there.

And they're trying to smuggle in pagan neo-Nazism under the veil and under the disguise of Christianity and of religion.

And this is the problem.

Because the two are completely incompatible.

I am open about the fact of the tumultuous Farabi, what's going on?

I'm open, very open about the fact of the tumultuous relationship.

Between communism

And religion.

JSCO, what's going on?

But I'm not here lying to people about this history and this relationship and the distinctions between the two.

I need to debate the unveiled pagan Hindu Nazis now.

Uh.

That's yeah, those guys would be like if I told them, like, oh, so that's like the Chad yes face of a debate opponent.

I like they would be like, Yes, that's the caste system.

We believe in it.

At least they'd be honest.

Yeah, I'd be like, the Nazis are pagan.

They'd be like, yes, sir, that's exactly my point.

Hot take, what's going on?

Where'd you get your shirt from?

Should I tell you?

You guys want ones if you want to know where I get my shirt from.

HDG, what's going on?

Um

It's not H and M.

What the fuck are you talking about?

It's this Japanese what is it called?

It's a Japanese clothing store and they only have them in some places.

What is it called?

Uniklo.

Yeah, Uniklo.

Uniklo.

And they're cheap.

They're very cheap.

Their clothes are very cheap.

And they're high quality.

And uh I like them.

UniClaw

That's where I I get my clothes from now.

I like the prices and I like the uh style and um that's where I shop.

So you too can look like Haas if you just shop at UniClo, I guess.

I mean, why the fuck am I advertising for them when I have should I'm a competitor with my own merch or something.

I don't know, guys.

L wear what you like.

Yeah.

Um

Yeah.

Anyway guys

Anyway guys, I will see you uh next stream.

Tuesday, right?

Bye bye.

Signing off.

Hope you guys had a great stream.

Bye-bye.