COMMUNISM WINNING | INFRAWOKE

Did you feel my heart is beating faster than the speed of sound?

Did you feel my heart is beating faster with you along?

Shit, the halal is a curved.

Comrade Kid with the five, what's going on, bro?

Appreciate you.

What's going on, everybody?

Oh boy, what an interesting night.

What an interesting past few days it's been actually.

Yo, what's up everybody?

What's up everybody?

My eyes are red as fuck right now.

I just got off of a red eye flight.

As a matter of fact,

Kuzaz with the 25.

What's going on, bro?

Appreciate you.

Appreciate you.

What's going on, y'all?

Who's as that's what I'm talking about?

That's what I'm talking about.

So guys, as I was on my yacht enjoying myself on my yacht,

Guzats, thank you, man.

Appreciate it.

The yacht's gonna be refueled.

So, as I enjoy myself on my yacht.

I noticed some people

Well, I didn't notice anything actually.

If you don't guys don't know this, we have people in every single sect, in every single community there is.

Especially on the left, mainly on the left.

And mostly, we're not there to cause trouble.

We just collect information.

We know everything going on all the time.

So stupid, these stupid children wanna play games with me.

We know you choose the wrong people to fuck with, okay?

We know everything.

We have everything.

You guys have no security, nothing, okay?

Some people wanted to play some games over the past few days, actually.

It's quite cute, it's quite funny.

But I have to say something with some frankness.

I am not like you.

I'm not like you.

I don't walk on this earth with fear of anything, actually.

I mean, what?

I'm scared of some furries.

Why?

If I'm scared of some furries, I go to Donbass 'cause I'm scared of some furries.

I go to Lebanon.

During the funeral of Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, I go to the border with Israeli snipers.

You could see the glint in their sniper pointed at us because I'm scared of you bitch ass people.

Now, calm down, little mice.

You won't do anything, I promise.

You won't do anything.

Why should I live in fear?

Why would I live in fear of anyone?

And Owen, I see you in my chat, you just sound like a bitch to me.

You sound like a absolute bitch to me.

Everyone, you need to understand something about me.

There's no way to victimize me, okay?

You want to come.

Let's say you're not the government because they're the only ones who could do it.

You want to come and kill me.

I'm going to make sure I take you with me.

100,000%.

So even if you succeed.

Even if I'm unable to take you with me, you will have a target on your back for the rest of your fucking life.

So, why should I care?

I'm trying to help.

See this is your problem, is making it seem like I'm some kinda victim who needs anyone's help.

You're a fucking retard, by the way.

Why would I need help for what?

What's the worst thing that can happen to me?

I could be killed.

Who gives a fuck?

Am I the only one who doesn't give a fuck about that?

Am I oh, is that crazy?

Sorry, that's crazy.

I'm sorry, we live in a bitch-ass society where that's crazy, where you don't care if you get killed or not.

But why if I can't control it, why would I fucking care?

If I can't control it, why would I care?

So, whatever happens, so what?

It's not like I'll be around to give a fuck about it.

You guys will be here to care about it, and I hope I hope you ensure that, you know.

You understand that's a debt that has to be paid.

I'll be I'll leave it at that.

I won't say anything more than that.

Because then, in that case, they're not coming after me, they're coming after you, not me.

I mean, I'm your leader.

They come after your leader, they're coming after you, right?

I'm not even going to be around to have to deal with it.

Actually, it's kind of a relief if that happened because I wouldn't even be around to have to deal with it.

Why would I care?

Why would I worry?

Now, of course, as your leader, of course, I'm going to stay alive.

Of course, I'm smart.

Of course, I'm secure.

But

S if that happened in a way that I couldn't control it, why would I give a fuck?

You know?

Like why would that bother me?

It wouldn't mean anything.

So why wa of all the people you try to inspire fear in, it's quite retarded actually.

I'm scared of some bitch people who won't show their face.

In any case, our information suggests these people

So you're not going to believe it, but basically, literally, Mossad.

Now, is it directly a Mossad officer?

No, but it's people under Mossad.

They infiltrate every single political extremist community on the internet, and they insert themselves exactly where they're going to be able to cause the most trouble, do the most maximal damage against their perceived enemies and against perceived threats.

And why are we pretending that it's not the left comms among whom the Mossad has the tightest grip around, so to speak, who's being raped by the Mossad, so to speak?

The leftcom ideology is just an ideology of being raped mentally and molested by the Mossad.

That's all it means.

It's the most goyish ideology on the left.

Oh, the Israeli proletariat in the Palestine.

Literally a goy slave, mentally molested ideology.

And it's no surprise that Mossad is so active and frequent among these communities.

The same thing with Palestine and Israel.

The proletariat of both countries are just as much a pro-actual Down syndrome.

Extra chromosome level.

What a fucking cuckold goy slave you have to be to subscribe to such a worldview, frankly.

Like, what else can you call it, right?

But in any case, you know, I just want to remind everyone, you can't victimize me in any kind of way.

Once again, even if you manage to kill me somehow without getting killed yourself,

which would be a feat, right?

Which I mean, eventually it would happen to you, for sure.

Even if I couldn't do it somehow, it would happen to you, and probably more than just you.

But in any case,

How am I?

How does that victimize me?

How would I be around to even care about that?

I live as a lion, only as a lion, that's it.

I live as a lion, as I sit and contemplate on my yacht, as I sit and contemplate on my yacht.

I think about what is the meaning of life.

They say, How can you be on this yacht?

How can you be a yacht owner, business owner?

325 million valuation in your yacht business.

By the way, I have a yacht business, 325 million valuation.

And it was a cooperative business.

It was me and um

All my employees, we we cooperatively run it.

Uh

We certainly cooperate.

Now do we get paid the same?

No.

Do they own anything legally?

No.

But we do cooperate to build the yachts.

In any case

Uh and people say I have such a problem.

But in any case, in my yacht business

I think about all the times I'm sitting on my yacht all day and people wonder, Haas.

Aren't you afraid to lose all of this that you have?

And I say

And I'm speaking wisdom.

I hope everyone's paying attention and you don't have ADHD.

I say no.

Because as long as I'm on this life, I will enjoy what little time I have left.

Life is quite short actually.

But when the time calls

For me to go.

So what?

No one understands the profundity of such an analysis.

It's like while you're here.

Enjoying your time on earth.

Why you live in fear like a bitch?

I'm a lion.

There's no way a lion can be a victim.

It's just not possible.

Ah, but in any case, you know, look look uh everything in life is about debt.

This little stunt has been noted.

Now there's a debt.

And it will be paid.

And stay tuned.

That's all I can say.

It's like, okay, you want to perform stunts like this?

Your stunts have been duly noted.

Um you know, don't cry victim for whatever comes next.

That's all I can say for now, you know?

What happened?

Literally nothing happened.

Nothing happened, just some stupid people on the computer on the internet.

Okay, if you want to know the story, it's some

Uh pro explicitly pro-Zionist types.

These people are adjacent with these neo-Nazi far-right accelerationists.

But they managed to somehow, maybe they have, maybe they haven't, we need to check.

Rally some of these left comm types.

You know, these left comm types always talk about LaSalle, LaSalle, LaSalle.

They managed to, you know, whip them into some kind of frenzy.

In order to try to target me.

What a victim I am Oh, what a victim I am But but nothing will happen, because nothing will happen.

What will happen?

Nothing.

I mean, it doesn't count when you won't do anything, right?

It doesn't count when you won't do anything.

But they want to go to war with us in this way.

It's it's random.

You know it's that show iCarly where they just have a random Tuesday.

So random Remember that thing?

So random That's how I feel.

So random

But okay, sure.

Not exactly

Something we consider important.

But debt is debt, is it not debt i Islam actually believes in debt, by the way, we just don't believe in interest, but we do believe in debt.

So, you know, the right people will know what's coming next.

And as for you guys, just understand and know that these people mean us.

They have bad intentions, I suppose, and you also have bad intentions, I guess, in self defense.

And that's all you need to know.

But uh

Here, I was thinking there would be no content tonight, by the way.

No, I'm just kidding.

We absolutely have a lot to talk about.

We absolutely actually I wanted to talk about a little bit regarding the leftcom thing.

You know what's so interesting because the way I see Marxism is it's the same thing that parallels the rise of the universal religion.

And the reason I call it the universal religion instead of just saying the Abrahamic tradition is because ultimately all of this goes back to Zoroastrianism, actually.

If you understand history, Judaism did not become a universal religion with a universal God until the Persians, until Cyrus the Great.

The whole story of the rise of universal religion is the story of Iran.

It's the story of the Persianate world.

It's the story of...

I don't like Jason Rezza Giorgiani at all.

I think he's completely wrong.

He says some horrific things, absolutely awful, wrong things.

uh disgusting things.

I completely disagree with him about everything.

But when he says Iran is the axis, you know, that's the axis mundi, that's the axis of all world universal civilization, I would say maybe not, excluding China and excluding

Mm, the Aztecs and the Mayans and the American civilizations.

Yes, pretty much.

The whole and excluding Africa, of course, the whole story of Eurasia is actually just about Iran.

Actually, that part is true.

So, all of these universal religions, whether it's Judaism, Christianity, or Islam, are moments or parts of the story of the Iranic.

rise of universal civilization and universal religion and universal humanity.

And of course, if you don't know this, the tomb of Lenin, the mausoleum of Lenin, was modeled after Cyrus the Great because some very um

Perceptive

Intellects in the Bolshevik movement, including probably Lunacharsky and so on,

uh eventually discovered and understood this themselves, that

The whole notion of the eschatology, the universal mankind, universal morality, this final battle and confrontation between good and evil, a final revolution, and so on and so on.

That is a Persianate and that is an Iranic notion.

It did not exist before Iran, so to speak.

Now, some may say Assyria and so on.

When we speak of Iran, we're talking about the culmination of whatever the fuck happened.

For thousands of years on the Fertile Crescent, Anatolia.

And Egypt as well, right?

So the Achaemenids inherited all of that thousands of years of history.

So this is why we call it Iranic, because that was the culmination that synthesized that thousands of years of that history of civilization.

But why am I talking about this?

Okay, so back on track to talk about what I wanted to talk about.

So there's a pattern as far as the rise of the universal religion that we see in the Abrahamic tradition.

Specifically, we have the movement of Judaism to Christianity and then to Islam, right?

Which we won't talk about that third movement just yet.

But the origin of Marxism, the rise of Marxism, parallels the story and the rise of the universal faith.

Universal faiths.

Specifically, classical Marxism is kind of like.

Judaism, right?

In a way.

In the sense that the classical Marx see, Judaism was not Judaism back in the day.

But after Jesus, Judaism became something different with the Talmud.

So Talmudic Marxism or classical Marxism.

These people are very few and far between.

I wouldn't call them enemies.

I would actually call them people of the book.

They're very few and far between.

They tend to be people who are not interested in Leninist politics.

Not necessarily opposed to it, but they just don't consider that to be the seat of what's important.

I would say Jehu is probably a Jewish classical Marxist.

For example, people like Jehu, people whose sole interest is classical Marxism, people whose sole province is classical Marxism of some kind, right?

And they just kind of focus on that and they don't care about inquiring on Marxism, Leninism, the national form, any of that kind of stuff.

That's a very rare just like the Jews became rare, that's a very rare form of the articulation of Marxism today.

No, I would not say Adorno counts as a true classical Jewish Marxist.

Adorno is something different.

Maybe actually maybe.

Maybe you could say Adorno is a version of that.

We don't want to overcomplicate things.

Okay.

So the transition.

Between the First International and the Third International.

This is where you have the intermediary space between Judaism and Christianity, right?

And so this is kind of like the Second Temple Judaism era.

And Kotsky, maybe he's like a Hellenizing Jew.

He wants to synthesize Judaism with the Greco-Roman tradition and integrate it more into that, right?

So these are the kind of Hellenizers of the faith, so to speak, right?

But then you have the um

The the Pharisees and the zealots and so on and so on.

But they you could call them anarchists, maybe, who knows, right?

Within this analogy.

But the important thing is this: Lenin is a Christological figure, for sure.

Lenin is a Christological figure.

And Marxism-Leninism mirrors Christianity in the sense that the Leninist party form becomes a kind of universal church.

uh form, right, that occupies the seat of uni and you can even look at you can even read the Sino-Soviet split as a kind of schism between the Byzantine and Western Roman Empire, right?

And now I won't tell you who which side is who, because that's a longer conversation and it's more complicated.

But um this is true.

Marxism-Leninism is like Christianity.

Why?

Because in the same way that Christianity takes the modifications of the Jewish faith in the form of the introduction of what Engels called vulgar Greek monotheism and Greek philosophy and so on and so on.

Into the form of the Trinity.

So it kind of takes this contradiction that's not necessarily reconciled, and it just says we believe in the Trinity, right?

So, um

That's basically

That's basically um

Christianity, where Christianity like locks in place this confrontation between Judaism and the Roman, whatever, Greco-Roman tradition.

But it doesn't necessarily reconcile the contradictions explicitly.

Implicitly, yes, it does, but explicitly, no.

And you're left with this form of the Holy Spirit in the form of the party or the church, right?

But at the level of belief and conviction in the heart, there's a problematic, right?

At the level of conviction and faith, that takes a back seat to the exoteric form of the church or of the Communist Party, so to speak.

And so the intimate relationship between the Jews and the Jewish God, like, oh, we're the chosen people, God loves us, we're Hashem's children, that actually disappears.

Now there's a mediation in the relationship between the community of believers and the divine through some kind of collective, enumerated collective.

So that being the church, right?

And Marxism-Leninism is just Christianity, right?

The m the the the the duality of Marx and Lenin.

reflects the confrontation between um in this case, it's not two distinct civilizations or something, but it is two different principles in the same way that there is a confrontation between Jewish monotheism and Greco Roman philosophy, right?

So, uh, Marxism-Leninism has these addendums to Marxism that it adds, right?

Like.

Marxism plus.

But Christianity, in a lot of ways, if you read Marx's Jewish question, is also Judaism plus.

Because it's still the Jewish God the Father, but it's also Jesus the Son and also the Holy Spirit.

And it's yes, the Old Testament plus the New Testament, and this kind of addendum, and Christ is the ultimate.

Point zero, right?

Zero point

That basically establishes uh a completely new, fresh basis for the faith.

That was also Lenin.

There's a massive element of contingency in the story of Christ, where Christ comes down to earth.

And does something purely out of love for humanity without any guarantee as to the outcome.

There's a heavy and strong emphasis on the consequences of free will for humanity for that and so on.

Well,

Lenin's Christological gesture is kind of like the April thesis when Lenin decides that the Russian peasantry, despite not having, despite having accumulated the sins of backwardness and not having ascended to the status of being the advanced proletariat that Marxism anticipated would eventually lead the revolution, Lenin issues this kind of blank slate, this fresh forgiveness, and says, we can bring you enlightenment and the foundations of a new civilization can be built from here, right?

And there's absolutely no guarantee as to the outcome of this.

But um

Lenin is that clean slate for Marxism, because if it wasn't for Lenin, Marxism would have been gone and dead and forgotten.

Now, there's so much more I have to do to really explain and articulate the point of how Marxism-Leninism is Christianity, how it parallels Christianity.

And um

Instead of doing that, I want to elaborate the analogy to something else.

Left-wing communism, left communism.

Now, there's an interesting

uh reference point in this analogy.

What in this case would left communism be?

It's very simple, Gnosticism.

The left communists are the Gnostics.

And I feel like there's a structural parallel between the historical Gnostics.

And the Christians, and exactly what they were fighting about, you actually do see that play out in the struggle.

I mean, there wasn't much of a struggle because left communists historically were irrelevant, but I guess now it's happening on the internet between left communists and Marxist-Leninists, right?

The left communists are Gnostics who regard the world to be completely false.

Well, what is the world according to them?

It is a world of capital.

Everything is, you know, for them, capital is a demiurge, right?

And every moment that we think we're partaking in this progressive or revolutionary process, we are actually just fulfilling the terms and conditions of capital.

And like the Gnostics, the left communists are not so interested in the question of, so, like, what the fuck should we actually do?

What are we going to do about anything?

They're more interested in making you awaken to the fact and be aware of the fact that.

What is at stake in the barrier, the price of true liberation, so to speak, from capital or capitalism is so much infinitely higher than anything you could possibly fathom or conceive or imagine.

And they consider it of the utmost importance that people first accept this fact and then secondarily, well, the question of what we actually do practically is like of secondary importance.

The important thing to know is that.

Everything we, you know, all the Marxists, all the people who think this is politics, this is revolutionary politics, this is all falsehood, this is all illusion.

So, for them, like the Gnostics believe the world is false.

The Nost the left communists regard the world of politics to be an illusion.

And actually, they use that language.

And when Lenin polemicizes with them in left-wing communism and infantile disorder, he literally charges them.

He responds them directly for using this language.

When they say, you know, the bourgeois parliamentary form is an illusion, it's obsolete.

Lenin goes, okay, it's obsolete for us, but is it obsolete in reality for the masses?

No, of course not, right?

He said, we Bolsheviks participated in the most reactionary of parliaments.

And so they um kind of it's just interesting, they kind of mirror the Gnostics in respect to their

Polemicizing or and vice versa with Marxism-Leninism or with Leninism more broadly, right?

And so so what is similar about the position that Marxist Leninists take in relation to, for example, the Christian polemics with the Gnostics?

Well,

The Christianity, see, this is what you need to understand, okay?

I hope you're following me here.

Early Christianity differed and broke from Judaism in that it regarded, in some sense, the material world, the prince of this world, to be the devil, right?

Judaism did not actually think that was the case.

Judaism regarded the material world to be completely fine, right?

But Christianity regards the prince of this world to be Satan, to be Lucifer, right?

And so there's an element of transcendence that comes with Christ.

Well, the analogy works in this case when you equate reality or the world, the material world, with the dimension of.

Bourgeois civilization and politics, in a sense.

Marxism, in some sense, Leninism is a qualitative break with bourgeois civilization in its entirety.

It's a qualitative break with bourgeois society, with bourgeois institutions, with bourgeois politics.

But it doesn't do so from the basis of saying all of that is an illusion, and now we've acquired the truth within us, which we can feel better about ourselves or something.

Leninism asserts that only by going through it can you get out the other way, so to speak, right?

And the early Christians have a similar view of the material world, right?

You cannot deny the world.

You cannot escape it.

You cannot.

Occupy a gnosis that has transcended it or is beyond it.

You have to suffer through this world to actually achieve some kind of parity within your soul with Christ, right?

And so there's an agreement between the Gnostics and the early Christians regarding the distance that they have to the world, right?

The material world, so to speak.

And just like there's an agreement between Marxist-Leninists and left communists about their rejection of social democracy.

But the left communists are

Well, the the the analogy speaks for itself.

It's the contradiction between Christianity and uh

Christianity and um

Gnosticism, more or less.

And it's tempting to say that this is actually.

It's tempting to say that this is actually just Judaism because the Jews are always waiting for the Messiah to come.

But I thought about this very deeply and I thought the left communists are not the Jews of Marxism because Jews are insignificant, whereas they are quite a tendency on the internet and have been a tendency for quite a time, actually, quite some time, and will continue to be a tendency, actually.

As the internet universalizes, as Marxism gets uploaded on the internet for a new generation, there are people who are going to find this position compelling.

Um

Now the there there are other te you know, tendencies that you can associate with Gnosticism in some sense, including neo Nazism.

I mean, quite explicitly actually, right?

The whole thing about how all all of reality is forsaken,

Uh it's completely an illusion.

Well they you just switch out a few terms in a few words and they share the same relationship.

That's why they uh there's such an overlap between the far right accelerationists and left comms, because they share the same relationship to the world, which is ultimately a kind of anarchism, is it not?

So these are anarchists, actually.

And if you want to know my stance Rabbi, what's up?

If you want to know my stance in relation to Marxism.

Uh

Well, it's Islam.

Like I I think that Marxism needs the Islamic stage now.

So and it makes sense to me because it's the tri it fulfills the tripart structure of the dialectic.

And so Marxism now must enter its If you want to know what h what is the new synthesis of Marxism Leninism going to have to be, we need a qualitative leap into the Islamification of Marxism.

DPR, what's up?

Uh because Marxism, Leninism, I see it similar to Christianity.

So think about this for a second.

We are occupying the desert, okay?

The stronghold of Christianity slash Marxism today are established civilizations like China.

That's great, but that doesn't offer a solution for those of us who are in the desert, who are beyond these strongholds, right?

Established citadels and strongholds of the faith.

So, in my opinion, you know, that's just kind of where my thoughts are, so to speak.

But if the reason the analogy works is because what we're talking about is the dialectical development of, historically, the universal.

Eurasia's universal.

It's the what we properly regard as the universal of world history.

What Hegel would call the universal spirit or the absolute spirit, right?

Um

That's what this story is, by the way.

And Marxism will obey the same development because all things actually do, in a sense, right?

Historically.

Um

Like this the put it this way: the universal within Marxism is the same as in the world religions.

And it's also the same as in the world history.

The universal within Marxism was first discovered by the Persians, actually.

Um, this is the truth, which many are not ready for, and that's okay, they're not ready for it, it's okay, but um.

So that is an impromptu thing I wanted to talk about a little bit, talking about the relationship of the development of Marxism to the universal history, right?

Because Marxism has its own universal history.

Marxism itself has its own history.

It undergoes its own development.

But here's the thing about Islam.

In the same way that Islam, did you guys know something?

The Prophet in Islam.

Supported and was rooting on the Byzantines to defeat the Persians.

In the Quran, they talk about how the Byzantines had suffered a defeat, but that how, by the will and grace of God, they would actually prevail over the Sassanids.

So there was a strong sympathy that they had with the Byzantine Christians from the get-go versus the Sassanids.

And um

Yeah.

For me, the Islamification of Marxism presupposes

The Christian part as true.

The Christians were correct against the Gnostics, against the Jews and other kinds of intermediary faiths.

But the view from Islam is that it just wasn't completed.

Islam doesn't deny Christianity is true.

Islam doesn't say Christianity is wrong or it's false.

It says that Christianity was never finished.

Never completed.

So to speak.

So

That's the view, you know?

So uh so.

How are my eyes looking?

Wait, not red, perfect.

Um, but you know, the Jews of Marxism are not bad.

The Jews of Marxism are people like Jehu, meaning they are not we don't agree with them, but they're not enemies.

Actually, they're s oftentimes sympathizers, if anything.

Because our enemies between Christians, Jews, and Muslims is what?

Pagans!

And some Hindus then, you know, they go, What we're not talking about India, we don't know anything about India right now.

We're talking about these pagan polytheistic tendencies that are a plague of the civilizations that we're accustomed to and our civilization today.

Pagans are nihilists.

Pagans, why is paganism inherently evil?

Would you want because sometimes people tell me, Haz, I'm a pagan, and I say, I'll concede it and say, Sure, that's fine, but I'm not talking about you.

When I say paganism, I'm talking about what it actually used to mean historically, right?

And what it's always meant historically, paganism, is.

The

So how do I phrase this in a simplistic way?

It is the idolatry of the division of labor and the suppression and denial and the disbelief in the integrated totality of labor.

If you want to translate this into purely Marxian terms, paganism regards the part as the only thing.

And that's why you see these demonic people on the internet.

They're pagans.

You know why they're pagans?

Do you even know what a demon is?

They're pagans because

Somebody who has the absolute in mind, at least to some extent, will, for example, inquire on the question of, well, what does it mean to do things like this?

What does this say about me?

What kind of society do I want to live in if this is what we're doing?

What ultimately is the meaning of my actions?

Like, what is the purpose of this?

What's the purpose?

You think with purpose, with a universal purpose, right?

But pagans, they just do shit because they're getting a short-term kick out of it.

And like, they are repressing any kind of confrontation.

With the long term consequences.

Right?

Pagans basically do shit because

They're getting some kind of immediate thrill from it or satisfaction.

But ultimately, they are not confronting the kind of holistic long-term consequences of what they're doing.

Right?

And so that is what the association of paganism with evil.

Because when you worship.

An idol, you're worshiping a part of the reality.

You're saying this part is the entire reality, right?

And you're denying how it's interrelated with literally everything else.

And this denial of the dialectical interrelation

of all things, so to speak.

uh leads to what we identify with evil.

Evil means being destructive, means being demonic, means being uh antisocial in some kind of sense, amoral, you're devoid of morals and so on.

Well, these people are pagans, you know?

So this is how it works.

So, that being said, Jews, Christians, and Muslims all agree that they reject paganism.

They reject pagans.

They reject, in principle, paganism, right?

All three of them agree.

They don't know how they agree.

They don't necessarily agree with how they agree, but they do agree on that point.

So, all of us Marxists, the halal people of the book within Marxism, it's Marxism-Leninism, obviously.

And then, you know, you can say like people like Jehu or David Harvey or something, these are like people of the book.

Meaning, Marxists who are just classical Marxists.

That's their focus.

That's all they care about.

Maybe even like Andrew Kleeman or something, right?

Like these are the Jews of Marxism.

And they're quite harmless and they're a small minority and they don't really intervene in the world of the disputes within Marxism.

The enemies we have in Marxism are pagan deviationists.

These are our enemies.

They're the deviationists.

They're the pagans.

They're the people who are trying to subvert Marxism from within and turn Marxism into some kind of division of labor within liberalism.

They're trying to make Marxism some kind of appendage of the wider Democratic Party's projects or liberalism.

They're trying to use Marxism and subordinate it.

So they're trying to use the universal faith, the universal mission, the universal outlook, accurately and properly called.

In order to subordinate it to the interests of very cynically at that the victory of the Democratic Party or something and so on and so on, right?

And yes, intersectionality is a pagan heresy.

It's a pagan heresy within the faith, so to speak, right?

So the analogy is not perfect, by the way, especially when it comes to the question of the Sinnoh-Soviet split.

Because in a sense, China is the Orthodox Christianity.

But in another sense, China is actually Catholicism.

So there's a degree to which both the USSR and China adopt aspects of the schism on different sides, different aspects.

Of course, China, there's a strong Jesuitical presence in China, and there has been for quite a while, actually, since before the time of the Republic of China, even under the Qing dynasty, right?

So this is the truth.

Huh.

By the way, we're going to be doing our tic-tac soon.

Soon, soon, soon, soon.

But in any case, we see something quite interesting happening right now.

I talked about this in a recent ACP meeting, but I have no reason not to talk about it on stream as well.

You know guys, do you want to know what I think the primary contradiction is right now internally as far as the energy hot is concerned?

I mean I feel like this is the solution to everything, right?

I think that the problem we have is you're not able, we're not able to translate the sources of our conviction and our belief to outsiders.

We have them ourselves, but we're not able to translate them and communicate them to outsiders.

And the reason we're not able to do that.

Is um well

because we don't reflect enough.

We're not actually reflecting on this shit enough.

We're not actually sitting down and thinking about what inspires us.

How do we articulate that inspiration into something

I mean

Maybe I'm making excuses for becoming a DJ or something, right?

No, but in all seriousness.

I would l you know the th you asked me what's the best output of the community the past year, the infrared community, it's like all the cosmo Xi Jinping, all the shit that you guys have made about that, it's like you guys got it.

That's a successful meme.

We haven't made it go viral, but it's like y'all are on the right track.

But if we could just be more reflective, if we could just articulate spiritually and you know art that all it's associated with the spirit, right?

We could be more artistic, we could be more reflective, we could just think more.

I was gonna make a post today on Twitter, but then I realized Twitter is full of retards and bots and it wouldn't do well.

I have something to tell you.

And this is why reflectiveness is so important, meditation and reflectiveness.

The same proportion of good and evil exists at every level, at every dimension, of every fraction, of every class, of every segment, at every layer of society, in every nation, in every religion, in every group, in every collective formation you can think of.

And internally, okay.

In every individual, actually, I'm going to say something that will surprise you.

Within every individual lies the same proportion of good and evil.

In every single individual

And so, my eyes are getting a little bit strained once again.

And so, within every individual, you have the same proportion of good and evil.

So, the question is: what is good and what is evil?

And what does it mean to be good?

What does it mean to be evil?

And if this is true, why do we believe in

The revolutionary cause.

Why do we fight for it?

I mean, because what I'm basically saying is there's nothing about being proletarian that makes you less evil, nothing about being bourgeois that makes you more.

Everyone's the same level of evil and good at every level.

There's no people say, Well, you think the poor are less evil?

Absolutely not.

Everyone is just as evil as anyone.

I mean, at every layer of society, if I take ten of you and put you in a room, you're just as evil as if

The aggregate of the entire think of the entire aggregate of America, or in some sense the world.

All of the balance between good and evil in the world.

If I take 20 of you and put you in a room, that same proportion is there.

In this way no one is superior to anyone morally.

No one is superior.

You are culpable in the exact amount of evil that exists in the world, and the exact proportion of evil that exists in the world.

is within you.

Of the collective humanity, right?

And I have to be frank about this, this is what I know from the party.

Now we don't allow evil tendencies to rear their head.

But

All the same defects, the flaws that you see anywhere across all society.

There is nothing about being a or calling yourself a communist or a revolutionary that makes you more or less bad.

On the far right, I'm sure it's the same thing.

And here it's the same.

How many twisted, psychopathic, antisocial personalities exist on our side of the fence?

I'm not even talking about infrared, like just being calling yourself a communist on the internet.

How many communists on the internet are twisted, demonic, psychotic, sadistic people using the ideology as a way, as a vehicle for their predation on their fellow man?

You know who talked about that?

Was Dostoevsky, by the way.

Many considered him a reactionary, but actually he was kind of correct when he talked about how the various psychological archetypes among revolutionaries.

You know how else agreed with me?

Felix Zhershinsky, when he said.

Among the Cheka we had saints and we had scoundrels.

We could count a good many scoundrels among our ranks.

We could count a good many saints.

We could count a good many saints, but we could also count a good many

Scoundrels

And who if not?

Sheikh Stalin

Proved

How many scoundrels?

We're in the ranks of the Bolshevik Party.

When he discovered they had become traitors.

Yagoda was a disgusting degenerate, so is Yezhov.

These were filthy, disgusting people who wormed their way to the top.

To the top.

Some say, How could a system that's good allow people Because what is good?

You think?

You think that because we're communists we've defeated evil on earth?

No.

So

What's the point then?

If what I'm saying is true, what's the point?

And this is the part that I'm going to explain to you.

Because remember, I want everyone to be reflective about something.

Good and evil.

is an objective contradiction.

Just as the prophet Zoroaster said.

It's an objective contradiction.

But like all contradictions, the contradiction

resolves inevitably inevitably

Because good and evil are moments of the totality.

Why is the absolute not immediately here?

Why is there not this hereness of the good, of the absolute, of the total, of of the communism?

Why is communism not here?

The reason there's good and evil is because of

This lack of immediacy.

So the dark, it's like, why did we have to go through the entire history of private property before we can get to communism?

Why did it have to happen?

Well, that's that dark part that I'm talking about.

But the dark part actually doesn't have normative content.

That's actually something we import upon it after the fact.

You see, the evil, it's not actually itself evil.

It's evil when we regard it

As the all.

In either direction, okay.

We have these two sides, these two parts within us, okay.

When we isolate one from the other, evil prevails.

That is evil.

End of story.

Doesn't matter if you try to be the good or if you try, if you just embrace the evil.

Evil lies in the inability to complete the struggle between the good and the evil within.

Because that struggle resolves into something.

And if the resolution consists in a postponement of the confrontation or an inability to really comprehensively reflect and go through that process, that is what it means to succumb to evil.

So

What does the good actually mean for the good to prevail?

For the conflict between what we call good and evil to be resolved, such that the dark part that we call evil becomes a necessary moment

In the fulfillment of a greater principle, of a greater thing, just like when people say, if God is real, why is there all this awful bad on earth beyond even other people's bad decisions?

Why give us diseases?

Why make us go through hardship and struggle?

Why do we have to struggle through all this shit?

And it's like, you want to know my honest answer to that as a kind of an atheist?

Because I could still defend God and I can defend belief in God.

Ones, if you want to hear my response to that.

When people say, if God was so good, why is He putting us through all of this?

Why do we get diseases?

Why do we get all this hardship thrown our way?

And it's like, forget about free will.

Not all of this is because people made bad decisions.

It's also because sometimes nature can be an asshole.

Why did God put us through this?

I'll tell you why.

I'll tell you exactly why.

Because

The good, what we call the good, is the good.

The moral

And the closeness with God that this test that we're put on earth for, right?

It's not about.

Pleasure.

It's not about feeling good.

It's not about immediately.

Um being comfortable.

That struggle, that struggle that we go through.

We have to go through that, come out the other end.

And only then do we achieve parity.

With what God intends for us as the fulfillment of a righteous life on earth.

And I'm careful with my words because Sufis would say something else.

I'm being very careful with my words to avoid heresy, because many of you aren't ready for the truth, which the Sufis understood.

Okay, I'll give you the truth, which is God made mankind to be known, as it said, to be worshipped, actually, not known, to be worshipped, okay?

Only when we go through this dialectical process of struggle do we properly worship the thing we're calling God.

Because the thing that we're calling God, what we call God, right,

Is sublime, is beyond the threshold of our ability to comprehend.

And with respect to the world of things and forces, is so mighty and awesome.

Do you know what awesome means?

It means it inspires awe.

It's also terrifying.

In a sense, God is also terrifying.

God is a unfathomably mighty, powerful force.

Okay, for example, right?

And so this is why, you know, they say in the Quran, I think, or I don't know if it was a hadith, when they say that.

When God was dispensing free will upon creation, even the mountains were terrified and he tried to give free will to mountains, but it just fucking destroyed them and smashed through them.

I mean, it was so powerful, even the mountains could not bear it, right?

Only this small, weak, vulnerable creature that we call man.

Could carry this burden that we call free will, right?

Anyway, what am I saying?

Why am I saying this?

The Sufis believed that creation.

is like a refracted

It's heretical, but I'm almost scared of saying it, but this is what they believed.

Creation consists in nothing more.

Then the

Than a refraction of the emanation, the self-emanation and self-disclosure of God.

Creation is an attribute of God.

God creates as a part of His pure absolute being.

All of this is a reflection of God.

They would go so far as to say a reflection of the face of God, right?

Um

And if God is such a mighty and powerful thing, it's not that to be to to to truly be called the creation of God does not mean to be made to live in a total uh you know um utopia where there's no struggle at all and everything is just immediate fulfillment and satisfaction.

To go through this fallen world, to go through the struggle, to go through the hardship, to go through all of the pain and all of the suffering, is to, in some sense,

Finally, get an idea or an approximation, let's say, of.

I don't want to say what God is because what God is is fundamentally unknowable, but that's really what it is.

It's what Ibn Arabi called the he, he, uh, not he contradiction.

Like everything is he being God, but also not he, because it's finite, it's particular.

But that's the truth.

If you want to have a comprehension of what it means to be dissolved into the absolute and to be rejoined and reunited in some sense with the absolute through the worship of the absolute, right?

To be careful with my words.

You have to go through that struggle, or else you're not worth it.

It's unworthy of something we call God.

If there's no struggle, then you could not possibly fathom, you could not possibly ever acquire any kind of understanding of what the absolute is.

You could not worship the absolute, you could not be grateful for the absolute if you didn't go through that struggle, because there would be no way for it to be disclosed to you, for us to even have any worship or knowledge of God would be impossible.

That's why there's struggle and hardship.

Because if there wasn't, there would be no way for us to even think of God in our head.

The word God would mean nothing without that.

You see?

If we were just living in a paradise from the get-go,

Like this, how could we properly worship God and think about something?

Okay, think about something as a crazy fuck.

Why did Adam and Eve bite the apple?

And God knew this would happen too, by the way.

I have a radical proposition.

The reason Adam and Eve bit the apple is 'cause they had no appreciation.

and no understanding of God in the garden.

They had no understanding of God.

They did not know what it meant to be created by God, and they did not know what it could possibly mean to worship God.

What was God to them?

It was nothing.

God was nothing to them in some sense.

And so, of course, they would bite that apple, right?

But think of you guys understand what I mean, persevere.

Like, think about this: he who lives on this earth.

and loses a loved one.

And perseveres through that and survives that, even if you lose them to a disease that was purely natural, no one's fault.

Having the patience to endure that and persevere that?

Is a higher form of reflection upon God than

Having no struggle at all.

Like

You understand what I mean?

It's like going through something like that.

You really know, you really learn.

You do acquire a wisdom.

There's wisdom in that, persevering through hardship, persevering through struggle.

How can you I mean does even a child understand?

What it means to have everything versus what does it mean to struggle through and then have it?

Like, which one is there glory in?

Which one is there glory?

Where is the glory?

Is there glory in having it all from the get-go?

Is there power?

Is there glory?

Is there might?

Is there remembrance?

Is there pride?

Is there gratitude?

Is there beauty?

No.

If there is beauty in having it all from the get-go, then if you were to go watch the Odyssey right now, you go into the theater, you watch The Odyssey, then here would be the story of The Odyssey.

The story of the Odyssey would be some asshole who's got two big titty mermaids flanking him side to side with champagne and gold.

And it's two hours of him just enjoying his life.

And that's it.

And he's just there.

And he's just, he's on a boat.

He's on a yacht like me all the time.

He's got cigars.

And nothing is happening except Paradise.

That's it.

That's all you're watching.

Actually it's kind of like porn when you think about it.

That's what it would be, right?

I mean, why else would someone sit through and watch and endure something like that?

No.

Is but the question is: this: Is there beauty in that?

Can anyone say that would be beautiful if there was a movie that had no plot?

There's no story arc?

You know?

It's just everything the the conclusion is already there.

You know, we need to think about communism the same way.

You know that, right?

We have to think about communism the same way.

How could communism be meaningful?

This is why when Elon Musk says

He's kind of a retart, right?

When he says he's sitting that in the interview, he's like

Um, I don't think there's going to be any money because the robots are just going to do everything.

Even if I were to agree with that on a technical level, doesn't that?

Kind of turn the story of communism into that retarded pornographic version of the Odyssey I just gave you?

Doesn't that kind of cheapen and demean the meaning of the struggle?

Oh, what, just because of fucking robots?

We're just gonna be sitting around and shut the fuck up.

I mean, how can you be a communist and this is your world view?

We're just gonna have robots and that's it?

Elon Musk, only a retard Redditor like Elon Musk believes that, who simultaneously would be the guy to go to a movie theater and he would see Odysseus smoking a blunt 420 and he'd be like, I love this.

And the whole movie is just Odysseus like enjoying himself.

And Elon Musk's like, yeah, I love it.

You could tell he's that disgusting fuck who would love such a movie, right?

But for a human being

For a human being, the plot arc is everything.

That's what gives meaning to us, that's for purpose, that's what that's how we achieve parity with ourselves.

If you want to be human, everything I could say could be interpreted in an atheistic way if you want.

You can be a Feuerbachian, you can be.

Well, I'm not going to talk about Marx yet, because most people aren't ready for that.

But you could just say this is about humanity acquiring self-relation.

In the same way that I say it's about mankind acquiring a proper relation with God, you could say well it's humanity the story of humanity acquiring proper self-relation, which is the same as Communism, right?

Um

Mm, everyone to become monastic.

And can I say something?

I hate monasticism.

And this is my number one.

I'm not going to get into it.

I don't like monasticism at all.

I hate it and I think it's wrong.

I as I sit on my yacht, I think about how wrong monasticism is.

As I'm on my yacht and I smoke my cigar, I think about how stupid

And wrong it is, in my opinion.

You're absolutely wrong.

You're absolutely wrong.

The thing I'll speak for men the thing in this world that matters is to be a man of taste.

To be a man of taste.

Tastefulness is the struggle.

The struggle is not.

Between having nothing and having everything, the struggle.

is being tasteful.

You understand?

Mila, thank you.

It's being tasteful.

I don't like the cop-out.

It's a cop-out.

You just...

I mean this at every level, by the way, because for example, there's some people, Gerald, what's up?

There's some people that you may call, for example, for example, I'll give you an example.

The Austin Red Guards probably were monastic.

I was monastic.

In respect to popular culture, I'm not going to watch a movie.

You know, for 10 years I wouldn't watch movies for like 10 something.

I wouldn't even go, I wouldn't even watch TV shows.

I was a fucking Salafi Marxist who thought that all this shit was brainwash.

Uh counter-revolutionary reactionary filth.

And that you have to spend your time reading, you can't go watch

Uh I'm kind of glad I went through this phase because you won't believe me, that's okay.

I did not watch any Avengers movie or any Marvel movie except Iron Man 1 when I was a kid.

Beyond that, I never watched any Marvel, nothing, because I went through the when everyone was watching Avengers Endgame and all the Avenger movies.

I was reading, I was being a Talmudic, monastic, whatever, Jewish guy with the hat, and I would just be rocking back and forth reading Marks.

I was disgusted.

I hated it.

It was filth.

I turned my back from everything.

But I was very extreme.

I was the same with music and so many other things, right?

Johnny, what's up?

But the truth is, if I'm being frank, the truth is this stuff is cop-out because it's easy.

I deny the world.

I reject everything.

You know what's fucking hard, though?

Being tasteful.

Like, having an actual opinion about a fucking movie.

That's not just your fucking ideology.

Like, so many people fail.

If you come from these parts, around these parts of ideological radicalism, some people will confuse.

And this is also Marxist literary critics, also a bunch of fucking retards.

They'll go watch a movie and they'll make it all about capitalism and a very crude, stupid Marxist analysis that will determine whether they think the movie is good or bad.

But to go and actually discern, to have the discernment, to see the beauty even in fallen things, that, my friends, is the true sagacious path.

You want to be a sage?

Get your ass into the fucking movie theater and watch the latest movie.

Listen to the latest music.

Open yourself up to culture.

Even the most fallen capitalist consumerism.

You have to discern fragments.

Of beauty, of possibility, something.

Like, that's what taste means: discernment, taste.

And that is one thousand percent more difficult than asceticism or monasticism.

That's different.

Even Love Island, no, you don't you can be what did I say?

The ratio between all of society's good and evil is the same within everyone.

Do you understand?

And so, I'm going to get back to that point.

So, is it ridiculous to not watch Love Island?

No, only some people, mainly women, watch Love Island.

So, you're a grown-ass man.

You don't have to do that.

It's a normal thing for a grown-ass man in the society we live in to not do that.

There are margins of.

Decisive freedom you have, okay, um, to say I won't watch this because it's fucking stupid.

And you will not have been a pretentious person by doing that.

The problem is when you repudiate and deny every possibility of the spontaneous articulation of the good, the beautiful, the true to take place in ways that are unfamiliar and unenumerated to you.

Fuck, just replay what I just said in the past 15 seconds and you'll be enlightened, okay?

But in any case, what is decisive then in the revolutionary struggle?

Well, it's very simple actually.

Though all are just as evil and good as all,

The bourgeoisie can do nothing and is nothing more.

Then the class formed

On the basis of surrendering to evil.

Meaning when we're occupied by institutions that have already given way and surrendered to the evil.

They will not complete the struggle, the jihad.

They won't complete the jihad.

They surrender to the evil.

And and they this surrender it's not even a surrender, it's the wrong word.

They

They institutionalize, they sanctify evil.

They turn evil into evil into a conceit.

They mock and repudiate those who insist.

No, there's still room.

There's still room for the struggle to resolve itself.

The proletariat is not a guarantee, it's a fighting chance.

that the evil was in mankind,

That the jihad can be waged on a higher plane.

Quote me, motherfucker, quote me.

The proletariat is not a guarantee rather it is a fighting chance that mankind may wage the jihad it so desperately needs to on a higher plane of struggle.

On a higher dimension.

That's the fucking truth.

It's not a guarantee, it's a possibility, it's a mere possibility, it's a fighting chance.

If there's a fighting chance, would you not do everything in the fucking world to take it?

That, my friends, is the revolutionary path.

The fighting chance of humanity Not a fucking guarantee, it's a fighting chance

You understand?

When the revolution is on its way, which it is the revolution in the productive forces, the revolution in the relations of production.

And those that rule us deny.

Deny the new decisive plane, they deny the jihad, they deny the struggle, the new struggle that must commence within the souls, within the hearts, within the spirit of man between good and evil.

When they deny this struggle entirely, they yield to the demons, they open the gates to the demons.

They elevate the demons to the status of the princes of this world.

Amilo, what's up with the 10?

Appreciate you so much.

But the proletariat.

The revolutionary path.

When we embrace this revolution, we say

We need we need to take this struggle to a new level.

We need to take history to a new level.

Not because the outcome is guaranteed to be good or devoid of evil itself, but because only that gives us the fighting chance and nothing else.

You see, this is the logic of the good and the morality in Marxism.

We don't say it's a solution to the struggle between good and evil.

We say

The struggle cannot even be waged.

Meaning without the inner jihad sorry, without the outer jihad, how can we have the space to wage the inner jihad?

We can't.

Look at all the scum in the Bolshevik party that Stalin had to purge.

Nothing about revolution guarantees evil won't prevail.

Nothing.

It's just a fighting chance that the good will.

You understand?

So

But I go back to the question of free will and struggle to speak about the good and evil within us.

Well, the good

I'll explain what the good is, okay?

Within us, the good, we can call it the known, we can call it the understood, the enumerated, the light, right?

And what we call evil is just the dark, right?

And what we don't know is that the real darkness can emerge when we lean on one or the other, when we either lean on the consciousness or We deny the faculty of consciousness entirely, right?

And repress it when we engage in that repression.

In either case, evil prevails.

But the resolution, so the two options are one-sidedness versus resolution.

Resolution is how good prevails.

The resolution of good and evil.

Into something, right?

And so within the society, the aggregate of all the good and the evil

Is in equal proportion everywhere at once in everyone.

You are as evil as the evilest among us.

Even if you haven't acted in wicked and evil ways, their evil is in you.

You need to understand that.

That evil is also in you.

Meaning you are responsible, you bear the guilt, you bear the debt, you're also culpable.

That should be the calling, the duty that you have.

To struggle to wage the jihad, right?

You never ha you can never say, never dehumanize people.

This is the truth.

It's a cope.

I'm not a humanitarian.

I'm saying it's a cope.

You're coping.

Oh, they're just like that because they're different.

No, they're really not different.

They're just in a different position.

If you were in that fucking position, maybe you would be better.

But do you understand how you would be better?

Have you really reflected upon why that is?

Because maybe you were raised the right way by your parents.

That's really the ninety nine percent of this a lot of the time.

But a whole lot of what we call the society we live in is full of orphaned people, right, who have no guidance at all.

Yeah.

I mean, do you want to know the level of spiritual cultivation I want our community to to be at, our movement?

I wanted to get to a point.

And I have to struggle as well.

I'm not saying I'm beyond this.

This is why we need to focus on the spiritual cultivation.

What if we get to a point where we have a movement?

Where for ninety nine point nine nine nine percent of us, if we were told, here's one billion dollars to betray all your comrades and betray the cause,

And they say no.

That my friends

is to be enlightened.

But I know for a fact that maybe ten percent would take a hundred thousand.

There are some among us who would take maybe twenty dollars.

Maybe they would, who knows?

There are some among us who would take a Snickers bar, maybe.

There are some among us who would

negotiate for something

How do people purge the pettiness and smallness within themselves?

Reflect, reflect, reflect, reflect.

Reflect, reflect, reflect.

And then ha say, well, if we reflect, how do we prevent narcissism?

Reflect through struggle alone.

Reflect as struggle alone.

Reflect as struggle alone

Don't reflect as

Anything but struggle.

That is the path and that is the way.

Be more reflective, you know, think more.

And I want us to be more cultured and tasteful, and I want us to reflect also upon the sources of inspiration for both us and the society.

Like, I would love for us to have things to say about movies, and I would love for us to produce beautiful things and inspiring things.

Where is the artist?

We need the infrared renaissance.

This is an artistic renaissance.

This is a spiritual movement.

This is our when I when history writes about the infrared renaissance in 2026, they need to say that, like,

They need to say that, like, you know, Shark Blaster was like the Da Vinci or something, and we had like Michelangelo.

Famous plan was like the Donatello or something.

Like, we need to have the history books right about.

How during the infrared renaissance

It was this giant proliferation of art and music.

And content and literature.

Aesthetics, styles, things, tasteful things, nice things.

Culture and intense spiritual cultivation.

It's a y'all stopped with all the Cosmos Esian Pink 'cause you don't know how to get the rest.

As I look upon original content right now.

I see a lot of nice stuff, but I also see a lot of people just sharing shit that's not original.

Meaning, you did not make this.

All right, I just saw something very interesting.

I'm not gonna lie.

Like.

I can't deny this is original, all right?

I just saw something kind of like, for example, like I don't actually understand what this is.

But but but credit where credit is due.

That this is something.

Okay dialectics of na okay.

I don't 100% know what's going on, but people are trying.

That's what counts.

The effort counts.

Some people are just sharing pictures that they didn't make.

Don't want to see it.

This city thinks it can cage us, but I've got the thorns to break free.

No chains can hold me.

Time to smash this cage!

How do I share this?

Hold on.

How do I share this Jason Unreal thing?

I have to play it, I have to put it here.

I have to basically do this.

Okay.

This city thinks it can cage us, but I've got the thorns to break free.

No chains can hold me.

Time to smash this cage!

No more holding back!

RAAAAAAA!

I'm going crazy!

You break the gut!

Ah, that eye!

Right.

Hey, come on!

That's some fucking cool shit.

NeedFeet makes some really cool stuff.

We got a song by Famous Plan called The Red Yurt.

It's 49 se how can the song be forty-nine seconds?

The river from American soil Stumbling against the Red York

I literally give this a zero out of ten.

This is like irredeemable.

Just like the worst thing I've ever heard in my life.

Like it's just like a complete mockery.

It's a complete mockery of

Everything we stand for.

Like why does he have a Russian accent?

Like what is his LARP?

Some of y'all really do not have the vision at all.

This is, you know, why we're a cult?

Because you guys just don't have the vision.

The reason we're a cult is because I'm the only one who understands that this is not the vision.

That's why we're a cult.

Until people know with certainty this is not the vision beyond me, and I have to tell y'all this is not it, then we have to be a cult.

We're going to remain a cult for the foreseeable future.

Like until y'all have that sixth sense that understands what the vibe is and what it's not.

We're just going to have to be a cult forever.

Because if I'm the only one who can understand.

This is a mega church.

This is not the movement.

This is not

This is not it.

If I'm the only person who's gonna keep understanding that.

We cannot proceed in the way

Like, when y'all get it, I'll tell you, y'all do not get it right now.

When y'all get it, y'all g y'all will get it when you get it.

You know what we need?

We just need when the Infrared Renaissance comes, it's not even started yet, we're just in the preliminary stages.

Infrared Renaissance is really going to start when we start going to YouTube, right?

And uh you know, I talked about the sustainer idea for ACP.

I haven't actually taken anything, by the way, like literally nothing.

But when that starts getting finalized and formalized more,

I'm just gonna start on YouTube.

And that may be like just August, I guess.

I don't know.

But um

That's really what's holding it back.

But uh when we start going back to YouTube,

Um

Then I want a new generation of people like Talent Sight and remember these all these other people who like just like

There's a, you know, there's somebody.

I gotta say something.

I don't know why you guys don't follow this person.

You should follow them.

Agent Jensen has a channel.

Okay, let's bring on Doomer.

Their YouTube channel, it's.

Strail Stane, what's up?

The infrared Kizzlebosch HQ.

First of all, it's like this is a nice, I love the name Kizzlebosch HQ.

And they always seem to, you know, clip streams, you know.

So I would subscribe to them.

This is a good account.

They're like it's not official, but you know, this person is like an example of someone taking the initiative, so to speak, you know.

And uh they make thumbnails and they're doing pretty cool stuff actually.

The cool brand on their thing.

Nice profile picture.

So that's something to keep in mind.

All right, guys.

I think with that being said,

We're gonna go

Some art from the community.

How is that Jackson?

We just got mentally retarded as people in our cor.

So this guy wrote Jackson Hinkle as a barista.

What is this just a random corporate stock photo, like a real photo?

Because this is definitely not AI.

What is this?

How could this be Jackson?

Who is Jackson supposed to be here, by the way?

I don't even know.

I'm looking for signs it's AI, but I don't honestly, I don't even

All right.

Just like straight up retarded now.

All right, let's go on Tic Tac.

Let's open up our Tic Tac.

Dun dun dun dun dun dun dun

I the gorilla who has the least common sense like in history is uh the snake one.

Infra snake has the l and just like I'm saying be reflective.

Just like think about for two seconds your role.

No, no, if you know, you know.

But just just think, you know?

Dane, what's up?

It's like SY, what's up?

Infrasnake, if we ever form an army, it's like you're not gonna be in charge.

You're not gonna be allowed anywhere near any operation at all.

Like you.

If you were on the field in an army,

We would be sneaking up on the enemy's uh compound and then you would yell, Hey, we found them We found them guys over here We f I found it I found it

It's like, oh, such you know, I'm so merciful because bless your heart, you have good intentions, but

Like what seriously?

You know?

Okay, is this the same guy?

Uh

St How's Russia doing?

Russia will be fine, Russia will be fine.

Russia will always be okay, because Russia is God's

There's a reason Russia exists.

I love Russia so much.

If you just think about it, it's like Russia

With Lennin's mausoleum.

And they just brought

This universal truth to the world.

And they it's just uh Russia has a special place in history for sure.

You know?

What can we say?

Can of beans, go ahead.

What's up, man?

Cool.

What?

How do you feel about Madeleine Pendleton calling you out on decks?

When?

I I mean in like the last few days?

Just kinda talking a bunch of shit on my ACP.

Um Maddleton is just I'm not I'm not I'm not rage baiting, I I really want to know.

Yeah, I mean just Maddleton is just um

Having too much Adderall, honestly, she needs to stop the Adderall.

She didn't feel be nice to us.

Okay.

Honestly, I think it's I mean yeah, it's just too much adder roll.

Okay, valid valid point.

Someone saying to me Madeline is better than me.

No, my blue hair is much bluer than hers, actually.

You see, I'm gonna explain something to you.

You know why Maddleton is uh not as good as me?

Because as the Sufis understand it,

Blue is actually one of the lowest colors in the uh Ishraq school of Illuminationism.

The stage of the blue, it represents the soul, but it's also associated with infancy and childhood because it's um

You know, you start with Adam, and that's the smoky black, right?

Emerging from the creation, right?

So there's smoke and there's clay, and it's like it's a darkness, right?

And then the first kind of light is the blue one, right?

Which is why when you're a child, blue is usually your favorite color, if you're being honest with yourself.

Some people are liars and they say, No, man, no, no, no, it was blue for sure.

Uh because when you're a child, you know, blue it represents imagination, it represents the immediacy of the soul, right?

But it's a very low stage actually on the hierarchy of colors in the Illuminationist school of the Sufis.

Above blue actually is red because red represents the passion.

So red represents passion, it represents intense, passionate devotion.

That's why, for example, the USSR flag will mog the flags of liberal countries because they're in this blue country, the EU, and then the Soviet flag, it's like power, crimson, it's like life, you know?

But then you have to pass through red as well.

You wanna know what red passes into?

Yellow.

Yellow is the color of the nobility.

Okay, the nobility of the soul.

The higher soul.

So after the passion you have the gr the yellow guys from Lebanon.

That's what it is, you know?

And then, um, I'm skipping many colors and stuff, but

You ascend to the luminous black, which is a type of not absence of color, but it's the light of lights.

It's the Jesus of your being.

And then the final color is the green, the Emerald Mountain.

You reach the Emerald Mountain, which also exists.

Look up the Emerald Mountain.

I think the Emerald Mountain is in America.

I think the Emerald Mountain is in the Rockies.

And that's the whole secret of why I'm bringing Islam to this land.

Not even bringing Islam to this land.

I'm bringing something completely new to this land.

What the Persians always talked about is the Emerald Mountain is in the west part of America, the Rocky Mountains.

That is where the Emerald Mountain is.

Yellowstone.

Yes, literally, I think so.

What did Mark say?

The difference between you and me is that if Marx was here, I could talk to I could sit down and talk to Marx because we share a background.

We're in the humanities.

We actually are cultivated people.

Me and Marx, we're cultivated individuals.

You are just a um.

Fan of Cheez-Its, you're just a fan of Tostitos.

You're a Doritos fan.

You go to the 7-Eleven and buy Doritos.

That's what you are.

If Marx was alive today, he and I would sit down and have a conversation as two learned Sufi Sufis.

Now, he's higher than me on the Sufi hierarchy, but we are in the same school because we're cultivating man.

We're in the humanities.

We want to be well-rounded individuals who study and understand the world around us and history and all these things.

You know, you know, can I tell you, LARPers, you tostitos, Doritos, chips fans, lays chips, you lays chips, LARPers.

When Frederick Engels, or vice versa something, would visit the home of Karl Marx, they would spend all night talking about what?

Guess what?

The Cathars.

They were talking about the Cathars.

Their interests were so niche.

They they loved these niche topics.

That's actually what they spent their time conversing and being passionate and talking about.

Frederick Engels was literally randomly learning Persian, okay?

You are a Tostitos fan who confuses Marxism for your own.

Anger at the world, which is the same thing as an incel, no different.

You're angry at the world because you don't have enough Doritos, and you're dragging Marx's name into it.

Meanwhile, Marx and Engels are conversing in heaven about the Cathars right now.

They're interested in all these niche topics you don't care about or you don't even pay attention to.

And you sit here and you look upon me, a student of Marx, and say, What does Marxism have to do with this?

What do your Doritos have to do with anything?

Conversing in heaven from a communist

It's like when you see a frequency this low, it's like such a low vibration I'm detecting in this chat.

It's like such a low level of intelligence, like just such a low, profoundly low.

Profoundly low, just unintelligent, lack of reflectiveness, lack of meditation, lack of cultivation spiritually, lack of having everything thought about this ever.

It's like you just got up.

This is, I'm going to name, okay.

His name is Henry of Scalitz.

Do you want to know the story of Henry of Scalitz in my chat?

Henry of Scalitz woke up in his pajamas in bed in the morning today and he yawned.

And then he got up and scratched his ass.

And then he go and he got a cup of coffee with a Pokemon on the coffee mug or something, right?

And then he walked his way to go get fruit loops and he poured himself a cereal with fruit loops and he put milk.

And he's like, he's just scratching his head, right?

Keep in mind, there's not a single thought that has transpired in his head, right?

Then he immediately, when he was done with that, he went to his computer.

And he started playing Fortnite or Roblox or something, right?

And he went into Roblox.

Okay, he went in a Roblox lobby and he got into an argument with people for six to twelve hours.

Strangers, he's getting into petty arguments with them about who stole the Robux.

So his whole day he's spending doing this.

Okay, this is what he's doing all day, his whole life.

Then, 30 minutes ago, he's tuned into the stream, and for the first time in his entire life,

He's thinking about Marxism for the first time.

But we have to pay for this fact.

So when the word Marx popped in his head, he immediately typed on his keyboard in my chat the first things that came to his mind, because he never spent a single moment in his life ever reflecting or thinking about this in silence.

He's just making me pay for the fact that he's thinking about it now for the first time ever.

And all of the things in his head that he can immediately associate it with it, he's just typing on the keyboard about that.

And that's the truth.

People talking, same thing with Dugan.

They mention the word Dugan.

They don't know what Dugan is, they know nothing of they've never reflected on anything, anything Dugan is trying to say about philosophy.

So it's the same problem.

I I'm being punished basically for making people think about things they've never thought about ever, and they have to give me their unfiltered, unmediated thoughts.

No, thank you.

This is not a democracy.

As I sit upon my yacht and reflect upon this insanity, I just have to say

As I sit up on my yacht and I reflect

I reflect

What's hell?

It's just like some nonsense Gnostic.

Like LaSalle is like the demiurge for these people.

Oh, what's hell?

LaSalle not even that relevant.

Why are you talking to me about LaSalle?

He's not relevant.

Like, for example, LaSalle, okay, he was like some huckster who helped build a compatible social democratic movement in Germany.

Okay, what do I have to do with that?

Mao Setong literally went to the countryside, he built, he led the long march.

Who is who, LaSalle?

You are La Salle, you are the same as La Salle.

The true Lassellians are the left comms because they're the ones in the cities sitting around doing nothing.

The Marxist-Leninists, Mao Seitong, Che Guevara, even Lenin, Stalin, these are people who Stalin was robbing banks.

What do you do?

You're just like LaSalle.

You sit around and

You're an urbanoid.

That's the only distinction that matters, by the way, okay, if you're a glasses wearer or not.

They're telling me about this glasses wearer named LaSalle, like I care about such a person.

Tell me about Saloff.

Was Paul a Roman spy?

Who subverted the social I don't think Jesus was a zealot at all.

Don't think he was a zealot.

I think he.

Jesus was leading a universalistic movement to end the debt for all of Rome, not just the Judeans, all of Rome to restore the Jew.

Jesus.

Was universal figure.

Universalistic figure.

The three Magi from the East, okay, understand the Persianate world.

Understand the Axis Mundi of global civilization is Persia.

The Magi came and blessed Jesus when he was an infant.

Jesus was fulfilling the universalistic mission.

Of the Persianate civilization.

What do you know of all my cads?

Nothing.

I know the Aztecs.

I read I saw on a TikTok some interesting things about Aztecs, but frankly, what do I know about Aztecs and Mayans and so on?

I don't know anything.

I know more a little more about Incans.

Okay, the truth is, Jesus was not a radical.

Jesus, okay, you want to know the truth?

Are you ready for the truth?

People talk about the Jewish question, Do you want to know the real the Jewish answer?

Who wants to know the Jewish answer?

Were invented?

By Achaemenid Persia

Judaism came from the Persian universal faith.

that we call Zorastrianism.

Moses, who spoke to God through the burning bush, guess which religion associates fire with the holiness and with the divine?

You need to understand the truth about history, k?

It's like

Why?

I take my glasses off and someone

The reason, this is what explains the current conflict with Iran when you think about it.

You know, I'm going to tell you something.

I saw the most strange.

thing, the most strange deep dive into the Jewish psych I've ever seen in my life.

It was a Larry David episode.

Larry David somehow got embroiled in some trouble and

The mullahs of Iran, the leader, the Ayatollah of Iran, something like that.

Like, he got in trouble with them.

And finally, he was put before them in a court and he was standing before like these figures of authority.

They looked authoritative and strong.

And then they forgave him and they're like, okay, whatever.

You we'll let you off the hook.

And then I thought about something interesting.

I was like,

That was a genuine show of respect.

Like, this is the true elder, these are the real authorities.

And it's almost like unconsciously, Jews do recognize Persia to be the leader, to be the elders, to be like the authority.

Because that's the imperial capital of the entire empire and civilization that created what we know of as Judaism.

Do you guys understand how we've been lied to?

The story of history.

It's not Rome.

It's always been Persia.

Jesus was a he was within Rome.

You know what was missing in Rome?

The king, the divine monarch.

It was an oligarchy.

The emperor was a frontman for this oligarchy.

The real civilization, the whole story of Eurasia, is about Persia.

Okay?

Rome was very primitive.

Greece was very primitive.

Everything was Persia.

You understand?

Greece was a splinter, a splinter breakaway faction.

Rome was a breakaway faction.

Rome was a primitive civilization that was emerging and it was fighting with Persia over control.

But Persia, but Rome never had an alternative universal principle versus Persia.

Never.

And also, you need to understand.

You need to understand, okay?

The cult of Mithras was emerging before Christianity or alongside Christianity in the Roman Empire itself.

Because it was speaking to the vacuum, metaphysical, spiritual, political, ontological, whatever, material vacuum.

And the cult of Mithras was about.

Mithras, the figure in the Aaronic religious traditions, was the person who stamped the contract between Ahura Mazda and Ahriman.

Ahri Man and Ahura Mazda basically agree in a certain tradition and lineage, certain folk telling of the story, that they will preside over the world in cyclical ways.

So, like for a certain period of time, Ahriman will preside, for a certain period of time, Ahura Mazda will preside.

And the one who oversees that contract between these two principles of the cosmos was Mithras.

Do you understand?

So the Mithraic mysteries, Mithras was a figure, a messianic type of figure, who is going to come and restore this change from Ahriman to Ahura Mazda, cleanse the world in fire, right, and restore justice on earth.

In a fallen world, right?

He was to be a Redeemer, a messianic figure, just like Jesus was.

So, Mithros.

What is interesting because the Mithraic cult emerged from within Rome.

It wasn't an Iranian Persian thing in Persia.

The Romans were beginning to adopt this themselves because they understood that, in some fundamental sense, they were inferior to Persia in terms of that they were missing the level of development Persia had had historically.

There's a spiritual vacuum in Rome.

So this is the fact.

Adam, go ahead.

Yo!

We can hear nothing.

Yes.

Okay, how are you doing, sir?

Terrible.

Why are you terrible?

Uh, 'cause I'm kinda hungry actually.

Can I I have a question for you?

Is Marxism Jewish?

Are you Jewish?

How did you know?

I can't believe it.

These Goyen these days?

I uh I thought that our disguises were getting much more sophisticated.

I had no idea what gave it away.

That was a little too good.

Well, I oughta tell you the anti-Semitism in this room is just getting a little bit too much.

So what are you saying?

Sir.

Sir, those are two normal questions.

I don't like the anti-Semitic line of inquiry that you're uh proposing to me, okay?

So tell me precisely what it is you're trying to ask me.

Karl No, sir, Karl Marx was Jewish himself.

No, he wasn't.

No, he wasn't.

He was a Kazilian.

No, he wasn't.

He especially was not that.

He was an Afro-Asiatic Semite Moorish Moorish from North Africa, actually.

De actually, probably of descendant, Phoenician descendant from Tunisia or something.

And then he was called the Moor.

He was dark and he was quite black, actually.

So, why are you spreading propaganda?

Name a single piece of propaganda I've been spreading.

Name a single one.

Go ahead.

This leftist nonsense that's not going to get anybody anywhere.

What's left is nonsense, explain it.

Marxism, communism, they're all useless.

And what's useful?

What's useful is

Finding the the Jewish supremacists in our country and

And crying about it?

And kindly kindly asking them to leave.

Okay.

And and and w what so what do you think will happen?

Just give it a few years, all the boomers will will die off and we won't give Israel money anymore.

No, you will still do it.

You'll still do it anyway, because

The whole you think let me ask you a question.

Where did Israel come from?

You think it starts from Israel?

The wickedness and evil that rules the world.

Israel is a

Emanation

Israel

It's a colony.

Forget if it's a colony or not.

It's a byproduct of this false, evil world we live in.

So what's the root of the evil in the world?

What's the real answer is yeah, it's atheism.

No.

Yes.

No.

There's no such thing as atheism.

There's no such thing as atheism.

Expand a little.

Do you believe God is real?

Anyone with a brain belie knows he's real.

You know God is real.

So if God is real, how can people be without God?

They can pretend there is no God.

How?

Even to pretend there's none.

How can you do so?

I ask you the same question, sir.

You cannot.

Yeah, but Marxism lays upon atheism.

So you don't believe in God.

Of course I do.

So you're an atheist?

Of course I'm not.

So how can atheism be real?

Because Marxism exists.

Tell me, how is it if God is real, how can Marxism deny God?

The reality is they do, regardless if you like it or not.

It's not Marxism that denied God.

It was the priests, it was the clerics, and churches and mosques.

who were hypocrites, monophic.

Sellouts!

Liars!

They're the ones who deny God.

That is copium.

That is the truth.

He left.

Marx took Zolfekar.

To the hypocrites, that's what Marxism is about.

So many unenlightened low vibrational

Low vibration people, frankly.

Chino, go ahead.

Oh shit.

Yo, what's up, huh?

The sky

I can't turn my camera on.

Um, anyway, I don't know how tapped in you are with um things going on in Mexico, but I'll just get right to my question.

Do you think there is a good probability that the United States will invade Mexico?

I don't know, man, but uh, we gotta keep cycling through these questions.

Uh, I saw it, go ahead.

Um, is my mic working?

No.

Okay, I hear it.

I'm good.

So, I have a question specifically about ACP.

I'm like learning more about this stuff, so I'm not too knowledgeable, but I just wanted to ask more about Duganism and that whole ideology, because I just kind of don't get why the ACP kind of subscribes to that.

The whole thing is.

Because I remember reading up that the ACP does partially subscribe to that.

And like, I understand Matt.

What are you talking about?

Partially subscribes.

Like, like, from what I know, Duganism is like, oh, capitalism, feudalism, communism, socialism, that all doesn't work.

We need a fourth place, right?

And I think the guy was kind of a nauseable.

I can't remember.

I'm sorry.

Um, repeat that, who's what?

Um I don't I think it's like yeah, Thomas Dugan I think his name was I don't remember Alexander Dugan.

A man I have met for two times, I think I'm three times probably.

I spoke to Dugan.

I know Dugan.

I know Dugan.

I actually I think I consider him a friend actually.

But I know Dugan.

Jackson knows Dugan and no one else knows him.

So the person to ask is me, what what about Dugan interests me?

No one else I mean, in the party, do we m is the party affiliated with Dugan, like party members?

Not really.

I'm the crazy guy who's interested in different thinkers, okay?

So uh about Dugan he is

A philosopher.

I've had many videos I made about Dugin, streams, lectures, videos, and so on.

But to summarize Dugin frankly and simply, it's about a term I like to call information battle space.

Okay, every country has its own informational infrastructure for the flow of information.

We just assume it's global and universal, but it's not.

Russia or the Soviet Union had a different one.

America has its own.

China has its own, and so on and so on.

And Dugin is struggling with the emergence of information space in the post-Soviet world.

And how to make sense of that information space.

Information, remember what information means.

Um

And basically his whole philosophy is a reflection of this, and the the resonance between those two things is very interesting to me.

I don't agree with Julian on

His conclusions, but I think he asks interesting questions regarding that.

Okay, thank you.

I probably will read whichever book it was that he published.

I'm sorry, it's been a bit since I read it.

See, like for me, my distance from Dugan is the same distance Marx had from the Physiocrats.

Put it that way.

Okay.

It's the same distance.

So people who call me a Duganist, okay, then Marx is a physiocrat then, because Marx also read the Physiocrats and he found them interesting and he dabbled in their ideas.

But then he ultimately drew his own conclusions, right?

So it's the same for me with respect to Dugan.

It's like I'm a Duganist as Marx was a physiocrat, right?

Yeah.

And then I have one more question, if you don't mind me asking.

Um so this is more about MAGA um communism and I understand like the inherent idea of it right to have a sort of like populist movement to rile the MAGA crowd into pushing for a revolution, but I just kind of don't understand like the whole idea of pushing for American nationalism within a communist base when you know American nationalism that's literally like um promoting the ideals of the imperialist power.

No, we're not we're not looking

You need to think of it like Huey Newton's intercommunalism.

We're not American nationalists.

We're not US nationalists, especially not US nationalists.

But nonetheless, we need.

A acknowledgement of the collective form, the form of collective existence we share as Americans.

And we need to discover that from the ground up.

And we need to discover it under the lens of history itself, of the United States, which is the first independent American state ever.

Before it was just directly European colonialism, the first project to build an independent state is called the United States.

Okay, the project is coming to an end.

We know that.

And we know all the contradictions.

We know all the horrors and all the evil and all the crimes.

You don't have to tell me three times or ten times or one time.

But nonetheless, we're here and we form some kind of nation.

We form some kind of collective existence, which is not an ideological project, but an objective existence.

And we need to discover what that is.

We can't just say, oh, we're just going to be proletarians or communists.

No, there are uniquely distinct conditions we face here.

And we have a separate our own history here, we have our own struggle here, okay?

Now, people don't like the strong emphasis on US patriotism.

Guess who else is not a fan of leaning too heavily on that either?

I'm not.

You know my my aesthetic is that we have ten red flags and then one Betsy Ross flag.

That's it.

We have ten red flags for every

Ten red flags we have, we have one Betsy Ross flag.

All right, you know, that's that's my understanding of the proportion.

All right, I kind of understand it a lot more now.

Thank you so much.

Um, that's a great night.

You too.

See ya.

Uh, Prax, Bouncy Prax, the guy who bounces and stuff.

The guy I wiped the floor with him, he got humiliated.

He was humiliated.

Tomato face, tomato face Ben, who is crushed, wiped, and humiliated in front of the whole crowd.

And then he lost on every point, he lost.

He said

He said China is better because they're doing capitalism.

Okay.

China is doing better than we are, and they are much more socialistic, let's say, than the United States.

How do you explain that?

But he literally was trying to say that deconstructing communism somehow automatically produces even more success than already just being capitalist and never having had communism in the first place.

That was his core logic.

No one bought it.

It was ridiculous.

And then the premise of the debate was, do we have a better vision for the future?

He didn't even engage.

He said, I don't even know why I'm here.

ACP is not relevant.

If it's not relevant enough to debate about the debate topic, then why did you show up, you clown?

He got so wrecked and humiliated he'll never show his face.

Without crying and seething.

Pathetic, pathetic, Ben,

Now he's obsessed with me for the rest of his life because I torment I've broken him.

It's like I'm Bane, but he's not even good enough to be Batman.

But he I st he's still broken.

He's just a broken man, if you can say man.

You can't really because he tries to I'm not even gonna get into it.

But

We have a single fan of this person in my chat, it's quite fascinating.

Why don't you uh request and show us on what point did he prevail?

Name one point he prevailed on.

Okay, so

It extends familial investment to the nation.

The far listen, you know, speaking of communities of people who are just where evil really does prevail, the far right has the most scumbags in any community ever.

And I say that I know the left has a lot of them, but the far right is the worst.

It's like that's just the worst, worst, worst community of people you could ever be part of.

They will stab you in the back and every oh, I've seen it.

I've seen what happens over there.

Go ahead, and I prefer the is horrible.

Look, look at these left comms, these little stupid people.

They try to play games with me.

They are SpongeBob square pants compared to what happens on the right, you know.

Go ahead, uh, uh, uh, traditionalist.

Yes, hello, hi.

Can I be heard?

Am I coming in loud and clear?

Yeah.

Yeah, I just wanted to know, uh, with regards to Marxism, uh, it's essentially, you know, uh, workers' rights, right?

No.

I'm sorry for being rude, but your name bores me so much.

I literally feel like I'm getting gamma ray cancer from your name.

Catholic traditionalist.

It's just.