IRAN WON | NO KINGS CRINGE | DEBATES

This sound better, or does this sound better?

The second one, or the first one?

Ones if the first or the second, the second one is better.

Uh the house divided cannot stand.

Alright y'all, we're all on the twos.

Oh my god, Midwest Sing with the 25.

What's up, bro?

Before the stream even starts, what's up, bro?

Thank you so much.

Appreciate it, my brother.

Thank you.

The kids, CCCCP, what's up?

The whole gang here.

What up, bro?

What up?

What up?

The whole gang here.

Whole gang here, type of shit.

What up y'all?

What up y'all, whole gang here type of shit.

Whole gang here type of shit.

What up y'all?

What up y'all?

How y'all doing?

We got a lot on our plate today.

Yo, what's up, everybody?

We got it.

We're gonna return to form.

Infrared streams are back because of this new formula that I unlocked.

Unlimited content, by the way.

But don't worry about that because I actually have a lot to talk about in the beginning part of this whole thing.

So.

This is tea, not caffeine.

So, uh uh uh Sophia Sophia Sophia

Sophia!

What up with the five?

Okay, guys, we got a lot to talk about.

All right, first of all,

This slipped my mind.

You know, it almost slipped my mind.

I almost kind of forgot because I always am so hard on myself.

I always make bad predictions or whatever.

But guess what?

Hey, bro, what's up, bro?

What's going on, Harold?

How are we doing?

Whole gang here, type of shit.

You know what I mean?

Whole gang here.

Harold's here, though.

Whole gang here, type of shit.

What up, so souless?

What's up?

What's up?

What's up?

Uh

It's it's past four weeks.

Trump said that this is going to be over three, four weeks.

He said it's going to be over three, four weeks.

We're past the four-week mark.

I ran one this bitch.

Iran won this bitch.

I ran one this bitch.

Okay?

Trump said that this whole thing would be over in three to four weeks.

What the hell?

We are past the four-week mark.

And Iran is still standing.

How many of us took that black pill?

Comrade Kidd, after Venezuela, how many of us, by the way, Captain Dreamer eats shit?

Drew Pavloo eats shit.

Paperwind, what's up bro?

How many of us took that black pill after Venezuela?

How many of us genuinely?

We're thinking it's all over for Iran, that this is going to be over quick, that the US Empire is on a roll, that it's just going to roll through and it's going to have a regime change, surgical strike, the corrupt elements.

I was black pilled as fuck.

And three, four weeks out after Trump declared that this shit was supposed to be over, it's not over.

Iran is still standing strong.

You know how fucking powerful that is?

You understand that Iran basically won.

Why?

Because the first step to victory is what?

Tanky Tom, what's up?

First step to victory.

Make the enemy lose face.

That's really it.

There's a lot of reasons the Battle of Stalingrad turned the whole war around.

I'm not an idiot.

I understand because of the Volgograd gap.

There were strategic reasons.

There were geographic reasons.

Yes.

But the Battle of Stalingrad was also the battle that everyone in the world decided was going to decide who wins.

And it became some ego shit for the Nazis.

Like, if we lose Stalingrad, we may as well lose this whole fucking thing.

Right?

So.

A huge factor in war is that you make the enemy lose face.

You contradict the word of the enemy.

The word of the US Empire has been contradicted.

It doesn't get more humiliating for the US Empire than that.

If Trump says this shit is gonna be over in four weeks and after four weeks passes, Iran is still standing, whoa, looks like these guys.

Confirmed, by the way.

For any remaining black pillars, confirmed, had no fucking idea what they were dealing with.

Had no fucking idea who they were trying to fuck with.

Confirmed, by the way.

Um and that's just on some real ass shit.

I mean

Let's just take a moment to appreciate that.

The the mo the the leader of the most powerful empire in the world is coming out in public and he's saying we're gonna this is gonna be over three, four weeks, we know what we're doing.

Three, four weeks later, the whole thing hasn't stopped.

Iran is still standing strong.

Yes, they're planning a ground invasion, we all know that.

And I said that if Iran survives past four weeks, Iran wins.

So we're past four weeks, Iran wins.

Because the entire premise of the operation was that this was going to be quick.

The en entire premise of the original attack on Iran.

Was that it would be quick.

And the fact that it's lasted this long so far means Iran wins.

From here on out, this is the story of how Iran is going to defeat the US Empire, in a way so devastating, it is going to be the end of the United States of America as we know it.

This is the history will look on.

Mark my words.

History is going to look on and say this was the beginning.

This is the thing that set in motion, officially, the process of the unraveling and unwinding of the United States of America.

I mean, it all goes, it it's all downhill from here for the United States as a state because there's going to be a protracted ground invasion, which Iran would love.

At the domestic level, it's already been pretty explosive without this war.

But the utter demoralization, the utter humiliation of our regime in the eyes of U.S.

citizens, it's going to embolden all of the wild actors that are within the regime, by the way, Democrat or Republican, or at the civilian level, who simply say, now's the time to cross the Rubicon and do some crazy, unprecedented ass shit by way of civil war, by way of taking control of sections of the military, the National Guard, who knows?

And the time of risks is upon us.

I mean, we've entered a blind alley where this was a royal fuck-up.

This was a genuine royal fuck-up.

By the regime, and it's only going to get worse.

And keep that in mind because, in the coming weeks, in the coming months, maybe, maybe there's a chance you're going to be hearing about things that might incline you to doom.

Be a little bit of a doomer about this.

Iranians are getting killed, Iranian troops are getting devastated with some, they might attack the power plants, they might attack the oil facilities.

But think about the long game.

The long game is that this is going to be the ugliest, most brutal fucking guerrilla war the world has ever seen.

If it gets to that point.

It it

Before the regime falls, you are going to witness the most aggressive, brutal and ruthless guerrilla warfare campaign history has ever seen.

And that will do the US in.

And notice I'm not just saying the US Empire, I'm saying the United States of America is going to end.

It's over.

This is the thing that sets it in motion.

It began with us attacking the world's oldest, one of the world's oldest.

civilizations and the first world empire on earth.

We attacked Iran.

We basically communicated to the stars above that we are willingly going over to our end.

It's a bad omen that you're at war with Iran.

It's a bad omen.

How can you go to war with eternity?

How can you go to war with the eternal reality of civilization?

Iran is Babylon.

Iran is Egypt.

Iran is Assyria.

Iran is Phoenicia.

Iran is everything.

Iran is the all of history.

The fire temples

Uh the tomb of Cyrus the Great, that is the same thing that Lenin's tomb.

Was constructed under the inspiration of, for a reason, because even the Bolsheviks recognized that Iran is the all, Iran is everything, Iran is the world.

You attack Iran, you go to war with Iran, you you you make yourself an aggressor, you fail to recognize Iran, you spell your own doom.

This is the truth.

Iran has won.

More or less, Iran has won.

Speak.

If only Marx was alive.

What would he think, by the way, of what's going on?

The Middle East, it's like Europe.

Europe was in the nineteenth century, right?

Bunch of kings, bunch of fat, pedophile kings and princes and fucking piece of shits with their crowns and their fucking royal families and this feudal nonsense retard fucking Gulf states, the fucking fat bitch swine king of Jordan and all these disgusting filthy monarchs representing the ancient regime, these fat pieces of shit normalized in our so-called yeah, but the Middle East, what did that fucking bald piece of shit envoy to Lebanon say?

He said, well, the best thing the Arabs have are monarchies.

Everyone should be a monarchy.

Iran is a republic.

It's a republic.

It's a revolutionary republic.

It carries the torch of Robespierre, the Jacobins.

They got the fucking guillotines and the heads are gonna be chopping and rolling.

You understand?

Iran.

Iran is the revolution of our time.

The whole fucking ancient regime of the Middle East.

All these fat, fucking, disgusting, obese US puppet fucking princes and kings.

Their heads will fucking roll.

Ban me from the UAE.

Ban me from Saudi Arabia.

Ban me from Qatar.

Ban me from Kuwait.

Ban me from Jordan.

I don't give a fuck.

I'll fucking say that.

Their heads will roll.

Just like the fucking heads.

Of the French king and his whore wife rolled.

Do you understand?

Iran is the republic.

It is the inheritance of the entire revolutionary history of mankind.

Amilo, what's up?

Think about that.

It's like you have the Middle East.

You have these disgusting monarchies in the 21st.

I mean, look, I am an ironic monarchist in the sense of I'm talking about an ancient, I'm talking about how there's parallels between the form of the proletarian dictatorship and a more ancient structure of political leadership and dictatorship and empire since ancient times, since the Bronze Age.

I talk about the a resonance across history.

Am I unironically a monarch who believes that people should actually wear a fucking crown and and and and and just what?

Be like an actual fucking king?

Fuck no, I'm not a retard.

Okay?

Like Xi Jinping, you can say he's an emperor, but is he unironically an emperor?

No, that's ridiculous.

That's fucking stupid.

In the 21st century, in 2026, you have fucking kings ruling the most strategically important region of the fucking world, the linchpin of the global economy, and the entire global empire under whose regime we are all subjects.

And it's a bunch of fucking monarchies from the Stone Age?

You have this extremely backward, corrupt, disgusting landscape in the Middle East.

And then Persia, Iran, it's a republic.

How fucking crazy is that?

It's a revolutionary republic founded upon the deposition of a royal family.

There are unironic left comms and Trotskyite retards who come to us and say Iran is reactionary because there's no gay rights and the US is relatively progressive because it's liberalism and Iran is reaction and fascist and the US is liberalism.

This is what these Zionist leftists and Zionist fake Marxists literally unironically say.

Had they lived during the time of the Jacobins, they would have called Robespierre a reactionary because he persecuted the effeminate, decadent aristocracy with powdered wigs.

You know, they used to wear dresses and run around and have queer theory or whatever.

And Robespierre put an end to all of it.

He persecuted the entire aristocracy.

They were all into that fashionable whatever nonsense.

The Jacobins put an end to it.

The Sans-Coulcoulot, whatever the fuck you say in French, they put an end to that nonsense.

They were just like the Iranian revolutionaries.

They were the same thing.

They were just like the Besiges.

On the streets.

It's the same thing in principle, really it is.

They mean to tell us

They mean to tell us that Iran is backwards.

Iran is a revolutionary republic in a region that has never been ruled by a mass politics ever.

Even I love the experience.

I don't what do I mean I love?

I appreciate the experience of Arab nationalism, I do.

Nasser, cool guy, Gaddafi.

Afiz Al Assad.

But they were not, this was not mass politics.

This was an elite military that took control, that was trying to, in many ways, bring the masses up.

Iran is an actual republic by for and of the people.

So, how crazy is it?

How insane is it?

That this is the story of the world today.

You have Iran fighting the world's biggest empire ever, most powerful empire ever.

And then you have these disgusting Gulf monarchies who represent the ancient regime in the region.

Glory to Iran!

Glory to Iran.

Honestly, glory to Iran.

By the way, Amila, thank you so much.

Holy shit, thank you so, so much.

Uh Iran.

Is that the Middle East has been this ancient regime for so long?

Everyone is blacked with all they get Iran.

This is gonna accelerate a regional revolution.

I'll go ahead and fucking say it.

Ban me from Jordan.

I don't give a fuck.

I don't care about going on smelly Air Jordan for the rest of my life.

I don't care.

Ban me from Jordan.

Ban me from all these fucking monarchical, disgusting shithole states.

I'm an American, I don't have to respect none of that.

Fuck the UAE, fuck Saudi Arabia, fuck Qatar, fuck the fuck Kuwait, fuck Jordan and its king.

Disgusting filthy kufr.

And fuck the king of Morocco too.

Oh, and never mind.

I'm sorry, I wanna go to Morocco.

Marengué with the five, what's up?

I just destroyed my chances of going to Morocco.

That was a joke.

I'm a comedian.

I'm an American comedian.

I could just say whatever I want, right?

Uh

Damn it.

So

Death, death to these disgusting Gulf monarchies And glory to Iran for ushering true progress into the region.

True progress into the region, by the way.

You have to really think about it.

What is progress and what is reaction?

Well, progress co what is okay, democracy is progressive according to Marxism.

What's democracy?

Iran is a democracy.

Iran is actual mass po it's governed by actual mass politics, the masses.

The masses have power in Iran.

Do they have power in Saudi Arabia?

Do they have power in Qatar?

Do they have power in Kuwait and the UA?

No, they fucking don't.

They're nothing.

They're either they're usually they're bribed like the ancient gay Reeks were.

with privilege and wealth, and then majority of the population are foreign slaves.

In fact, there's so many parallels between the Gulf Arab states and the ancient Gay Riks.

And they're not gonna prevail over Iran this time.

The UAE is in the crosshairs of Iran.

The UAE will never be allowed to fucking get its revenge that it so dearly The only way this comes to a conclusion regional revolution.

True regime change.

How about we show you some true regime change?

How about some real regime change for a change?

I forgot Bahrain.

Bahrain, Bahrain.

So this is the reality we're faced with.

John, what's up?

Appreciate you bro, thank you.

So

I think that I'm calling it for Iran.

That's what I'll say.

I'm calling it for Iran.

We're past the four-week mark that the operation was supposed to last this long, four weeks.

We're past that mark.

Now what are we seeing?

We're seeing that Trump

He's making some really funny claims.

It's like you can call it for Iran.

What what is he saying?

Oh man.

You have to appreciate what victory looks like.

Nothing to do with that.

What happens to the strait, we're not going to have anything to do with because these countries, China, China will go up and they'll fuel up their beautiful ships and they'll leave and they'll take care of themselves.

There's no reason for us to do it.

We hit them hard.

We got rid of a lot of the radicalized lunatics along the strait.

But if they want something, but I would say that within two weeks, maybe?

Two weeks, maybe three, we're hitting them very hard.

You got any more weeks?

You got any more weeks?

Two, three weeks.

I promise.

That's it.

Two, three more weeks.

You got any more weeks?

I promise.

I only need two, three more weeks.

I promise.

Buddy, what does this even mean anymore?

Two, three more weeks?

What happened to four weeks?

Very hard.

Last night we knocked out tremendous amounts of missile-making facilities.

As you probably read or wrote, we knocked out.

Excuse me?

Pardon me for interrupting.

The U.S.

will be gone or done with the war in 2010.

I think we two or three weeks.

We'll leave.

There's no reason for us to do this.

Look, the problem with the strait, a guy can take a mine, drop it in the water, and say, oh, it's unsafe.

It's not like you're taking out an army or you're taking out a country.

He can drop it.

Or he can take a machine gun from the shore and shoot a little few bullets at a ship.

Or maybe an over-the-shoulder missile, small missiles.

That's not for us.

That'll be fine.

But Trump also likes to do the jukeout.

And I think a ground invasion is quite possible.

He might just be saying this for the press, for the markets, really.

He might be saying it for the markets.

And he has, in fact, no intention of leaving in two, three weeks.

However, the fact that he's contradicting himself is a massive loss of face, if you ask me.

He massively loses faith from this.

I think that's an objective fact.

For France.

That'll be for whoever's using the straight.

But I think when we leave, probably that's all cleared up.

Today I heard tremendous numbers of ships were sailing through.

I just gave you guys a a meme, you know.

That that uh that screenshot of me checking my phone.

That's gonna be winning.

This is a great reaction.

That's a great reaction.

That's going to be a great reaction.

Okay, so you just heard him, right?

Two, three more weeks.

Ah, well, it unfortunately it just doesn't work that way, you know?

Okay, so two things can happen tomorrow.

9 p.m.

Eastern Time, perhaps it is possible that Donald Trump will be announcing the ground invasion begins tomorrow at 9 p.m.

We'll have to see.

But so far, I think we can say in some good confidence that Trump has lost the war, the US has lost, Iran has won.

No thanks to the domestic leftists in the United States, by the way.

No thanks to any kind of domestic opposition forces.

Besides, of course, the disgruntled MAGA base who's pressuring Trump via Tucker Carlson and others.

Trump, by the way, doesn't care what the Democrats think.

He would love nothing more than to polarize the country along red-blue lines as far as support for the war is concerned.

But it's the fact that MAGA is against the intervention that is giving the administration a hard time when it comes to the domestic lack of approval for this war.

Let's never forget that, by the way.

You see, he doesn't care what liberals think, he doesn't care what nobody cares what they think, they're not in power.

The only thing that successfully sabotaged these imperialist plans is the fact that Trump's electorate that got him elected is not on board with it.

And uh this is common sense, really.

So these are the simple facts.

These are the simple facts.

And uh I have to show you guys some things.

Speaking of domestic opposition to the administration.

There are different forms that takes.

There's the opposition that comes from the masses and then there's this.

So I want y a few things.

I've seen a lot of posts of people claiming that no kings we can't just stay in our bubbles.

No kings is how we reach the masses and convert them to communism.

Yeah, yeah, people at No Kings, they're they're more disposed to to virtue signal.

Yes, they're more disposed to virtue signal about left wing issues.

I agree.

Are they more disposed materially to be opposed to imperialism?

No, they're the beneficiaries of imperialism.

In any case, this is the masses according to these people.

Yeah.

I mean, it's just the epitome of the blue sky.

I can sense.

This is the, there's a tone.

It's the blue sky Libtard.

Uh, millennial.

This is very much millennial.

By the way, if all millennials died, I think about this a lot.

I'm maybe I'm a millennial, maybe I'm not gonna make the cut.

But if all millennials disappeared,

Immediate revolution, immediate victory of socialism, immediately vi immediate victory of communism, by the way.

They are the most vicious, disgusting, subhuman generation the world has ever seen, at least in the American context.

Millennial, the average millennial, they are so disgusting and filthy, I hate them.

They love The Simpsons.

They are all low testosterone males, and uh the women are fucking retarded and bird-brained.

And this is their humor.

I mean, this is what they.

This is so quirky.

And I don't know how to.

I don't know what to.

It's like wholesome wholesome uh rebelliousness, wholesome punk rock.

And I remember it distinctly from Twitter and I remember remember Twitter in twenty twenty one?

Remember what that was like?

All these fucking millennials running around?

Yeah, this is that Facebook humor from Facebook Millennials and they just

This is this is them.

This is their whole world.

Remember on early Twitter when I just call everybody ugly?

Remember early Twitter?

I mean, Jennifer, I'm not talking about you.

All right, I'm not talking about our people.

I'm talking about on 2021 on Twitter when I call everybody ugly.

Do I?

I, you know what?

It'd be really mean if I did this because I don't know how much people evolved.

But what if we just did a throwback and I go back to that original post and I show you all the people that quote tweeted me to contradict when I said that all my haters are ugly, right?

You would not, I went the other day, I went back and looked at the people who quote tweeted me to contradict me.

You would not believe.

You would, they're all in blue sky now.

You would not believe.

Should I?

Okay, you know what?

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

I'm it's

Fuck it.

'Cause I was the other day I was just curious, like, like

Oh man.

Um

I look back and I'm like, why the fuck?

Uh why the fuck did I like why why did nobody call this shit out for how crazy it is?

Yeah.

Hold up.

I gotta find it.

The people that tried to contradict me.

By the way, the profile picture, I was the most baller person on Twitter at that time.

This was my profile picture while I was talking all that shit.

That's not, I'm just telling you, you'll never find anything like that ever again.

I had to adapt to the autism of the internet.

Those who knew knew those who knew knew

Hold on, I gotta find it.

Oh my god.

Uh

I gotta find it, hold on.

Oh, it was so.

There was so much.

There was one that shocked me.

One of them, like, totally fucking shocked me.

When I saw it, I was like, all right.

Hold on.

It was so back then, there was no.

Back then, the internet, Twitter was such a bubble that people fucking did this without getting bullied.

I have to show you.

Hold on.

I'm looking for one.

Like one okay, there's one that just fucking

Extremely like extreme confusion on my part.

Like, I just got fucking confused.

Okay, I got super confused.

Yeah.

All right.

Hold on.

I think it's here.

Oh, no.

Okay.

The ones that are females, I'm not going to pick on them because that's satanic, right?

Okay, there's a few.

Oh my god, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro.

Okay, I'm not gonna pick on females, but this is fucking crazy.

This one is crazy.

All right, no, this is the one that I saw that just confused the fuck out of me.

I look the other day, I was like, I was so bad back then.

Was I so bad?

And then I'm like, okay, if I had attractive haters, my whole worldview would collapse.

Look who quotes eats me.

I was just confused.

I saw that the other day, I was like, what did they mean by this?

I was like

I was like, what did they mean by this?

There's so many examples like that.

I was like, why did I let them get away with that?

I'm so nice.

And then look at this one.

Hey, loser.

What does this mean?

What am I supposed?

What is my reaction supposed to be to this?

What was my reaction supposed to be?

Can we now agree that I was a little bit vindicated?

There were a lot of people that, like, Twitter made very confident because of the whole millennial, like, body positivity thing.

These mill I don't know, these millennials really were just, like, so confident in themselves.

Because, like, this delusional culture they created where everyone is beautiful, or something.

I was not even trying to be that mean.

Um, I could have been.

Okay, yeah, what what was the point?

Like what okay, what

Buddy, what did you mean by this?

What was what was the meaning of that?

What were you what was what was the statement you were trying to make?

You know?

Like, why was I the bad guy?

Why was I the unreasonable one?

Why was I treated as such an awful person?

I was shy.

I was like, look, I was new to the internet, to be honest.

I was just like, no, okay, the one that takes the cake, genuinely, the one that takes the cake is this.

It's just like, just so random.

Like, what was the point?

What was the point of this?

It's just like random.

Like, oh, this is the epitome of an attractive person.

I don't understand.

I was, I'm really confused.

I'm still confused to this day.

I mean

And like, it was kind of a joke in a way.

It was, I yeah, it was a joke.

My original tweet was a joke.

But then getting flooded in the quote tweets.

I was just like, mm, d so are do we just not have self awareness on the internet?

Is there just no self awareness?

And then I'm like, Oh, you've just banned everyone who imposes self awareness on you back then when Twitter was a bubble.

That was a dark fucking time when they were all gassed up and confident because Biden won.

Uh, it was such a strange time.

It's like people were retarded, they had no self-awareness at all.

Like, they could not tell when you're joking, but not even, but like.

Uh, so so we just do we just have no self-awareness?

Are we just devoid of self-awareness?

Are we just uh yeah, so this is millennials?

This is why I hate them, and I hope they die in a video game.

I very much dislike millennials and their it's their culture of millennials, to be clear.

I hate millennial culture.

If you are a millennial, I recommend.

Um

Uh just uh uh adopt the culture of something else besides the millennial one because

I see the No Kings protests and I'm like

Mm.

It it people oh, you're just doing culture worst.

No, I'm not.

This is objective truth.

There's something inherently false and delusional about it.

There's something about it that is basically just.

Um

A denial of reality itself and in an insane level of it's just a false response and reflection of the world that corresponds to the parasitism of the professional petty bourgeoisie, the buzzfeed professional HR bourgeoisie of the millennials.

these hipsters who who own the fucking uh uh burger joint where they charge twenty five dollars for a fucking burger that were entirely carried and ga and they have the man bun and they have the lumberjack shirt.

And they were entirely carried

By the imperialist superpro.

Yeah, that's the labor aristocracy, by the way.

For all you Maw is Third Worlders, who the fuck do you think the labor aristocracy is?

It's not the fucking coal miner, okay?

Oh, well, the coal miner has a lot of money.

No, he has a lot of overhead fucking operating costs for all the fucking equipment he owns and all the shit he needs.

Like his big truck.

Oh, there you have a big truck.

Yeah, the truck they use for work.

That they literally, it's an operating cost.

It's not a form of luxury for them.

In any case, for the blue collar I hate when people say blue collar workers are paid so much, yeah, because the cost of their fucking labor is that expensive because of the fucking operating costs of the fucking machines that they use.

Raf, what's up?

Um

Those are not the labor aristocracy.

The labor aristocracy is the office millennial class that gets paid to sit on their ass and do nothing.

And there's been mass layoffs of that specific class because of the rise of AI.

And now they're trying to make themselves and portray themselves the revolutionary vanguard.

No, you're not.

You're a reactionary generation.

They're a reactionary generation, to be clear.

Fundamentally reactionary generation.

They talk so much about big tech and the evils of big tech.

We don't disagree.

We're against Peter Thiel.

We're against Palantir.

Of course we are.

But where were they with respect to Wall Street?

Where were they with respect?

Can they even name the money managers of Wall Street?

Can they even name the major hedge funds?

Can they even name

The non-celebrity capitalist class, the ones that don't have you know a huge presence in the mainstream with respect to PR.

No, they can't.

Of course they can't.

Right?

Because they don't care.

So that is the rotten, awful truth of the matter.

Um they regard themselves as the revolutionary vanguard.

They're dead weight.

They're a source of profound cringe.

They're on blue sky.

They're still refused to accept reality.

They're still engineering a fake artificial world that they live in, a safe space, if you will.

Um, because they are in denial and they have delusions.

And a conversation with even one of them will reveal that.

One of these blue sky, no kings people.

Just one conversation will reveal that they do this kind of double thing.

I know I'm using like conserva slop terms.

I don't fucking care.

I'm pretty tired tonight.

I don't know.

I'm not tired.

I have high energy.

What I'm trying to say is that seeing that video of the frogs dancing gave me flashbacks to

The the struggle I had on social media when I first came onto the internet.

With all of these subhuman, disgusting, filthy beings.

And I'm so merciful, and I'm so forgiving, and I'm such a good person now.

Because I don't see them anymore.

Because I like bl either blocked all of them or they all fucked off to blue sky.

So I don't see them anymore.

They've blocked me, so I don't see them anymore.

I still hate them.

I still really despise them.

That didn't change.

And that's not gonna change, by the way.

Not gonna change.

Uh so this is the okay, to get a little serious, I know I'm simplifying a lot of things.

I'm doing it for the purposes of

Yeah.

Uh hyperbole.

Um the truth is, there is a contingent of people who attend No Kings protests, who are potentially reasonable, potentially capable of being won over to the cause.

But there is a considerable number of people who were part of the MAGA movement.

Who you could say the same thing for?

if not more.

I would say more, by the way.

What I don't understand is why are we crucified on the cross of all of MAGA's sins and errors, and then of course Trump himself for employing a strategy of attempting to disseminate

uh class consciousness and revol and and cultivate the existing revolutionary consciousness among MAGA.

But that's sinful because among MAGA there are all these false, problematic ideological tendencies.

And then, of course, Trump himself and the Republican Party and so on.

But then when they they advocate the same strategy but at the the no kings protest.

Well, let's look at the no kings protest.

Organized by a Zionist couple from Washington, DC, liberal Zionist, of course.

Majority of the people that go there, their prevailing ideological tendencies are pro-NATO, pro liberal Zionism.

And of course, pro-CIA, pro-American deep state versus budget cuts and so on.

Why is one sinful and the other is permitted?

Well, because the deciding factor happens to be culture.

They say we're upset with culture war.

No, we're not.

They are.

Because what is fun?

What's the difference?

Why is one, oh, we're just going to go educate people about communism?

It doesn't mean we agree with everything.

So, why is that so hard to do for MAGA people?

Well, MAGA is inherently Zionist, whereas No Kings isn't.

Why?

Think about why is that based on a materialist analysis of any kind?

Because let's follow the fucking money.

How do these fucking people get their salary?

Where do they fucking get it from?

I guarantee you, you follow the fucking money in one case, you see a material incentive to support Zionist hegemony.

Of course, these people have to find a moral justification for their Zionism.

In contrast,

to the uh to the right wing.

And they're also right wing, by the way.

But the the difference is they sanctify their Zionism with the pretense of morality, with the pretense of some kind of justification.

Which is arguably worse if you think about it.

Liberal Zionism, the Zionism of Bernie Sanders, the Zionism of AOC, it is not incrementally closer to a pro-Palestinian position.

That's not how it fucking works, where there's a spectrum of, well, I'm a little more critical of Israel, and then farther along, incrementally, I become pro-Hamas, and then you're one of these brainwashed evangelicals.

Or uneducated types, and you might be pro-Israel or something, and then it's in the opposite direction.

That's not how it fucking works.

Because that ignores the dimension of how the anti-Zionist position is qualitatively distinct from all hegemonic ideologies.

Anti-Zionism entails not an incremental logical conclusion from AOC Bernie-style liberal Zionism.

Anti-Zionism entails a fundamental qualitative rupture with the hegemony.

That is why there's an easy pipeline from MAGA to being anti-Zionist.

We're seeing that, we've been seeing that for years.

It's easy.

It doesn't matter where you start out.

The question is: what material factors incentivize the qualitative rupture with the hegemonic consciousness that allows you to be a conspiracy theorist and fundamentally break from the narratives that are officiated within mainstream institutions?

I don't care.

Look.

Okay, look.

Calla Walsh.

Calla Cala Walsh.

A Cala Walsh is not a big fan of me.

And I don't care, frankly.

Kala has said I don't care.

I just don't care.

Kala is, you know, she's her.

She's her, right?

What can I say?

Do I respect her?

Okay, I do.

Okay, but.

But, okay, we can be enemies in a superficial way.

I don't care.

Not real enemies, though, to be honest.

Uh, but I honestly, I do respect her, like in all honesty, right?

But I'll tell you why I respect Calla Walsh, and I'm not a fucking feminist, so fuck off with this shit.

Oh, you're just please, you know, sometimes, guys, when I say something nice or I show some kind of sense of like I'm willing to transcend pettiness and, you know.

express a mature position.

Some of y'all take it too far and then you just start like kissing people's ass and you're like, Oh, where are you?

Listen, I'm a fucking realist.

I'm not I I literally um

It's not an open door to start Teletubbies and Barney the Dinosaur, right?

It's an open, it's just let's be fucking principled and straight up about our shit.

Straight up.

You don't have to be friends with anyone.

She doesn't have to be friends with us, vice versa, for us to recognize she's principled.

And there's something about her that we can respect.

Doesn't mean we have to agree with her about everything.

Doesn't mean that on a personal level we have to be friendly.

It means we, you know, we're about some real ass shit.

Straight up on some real ass shit.

When I found out she moved to Lebanon to Beirut, I was like, okay, maybe she's probably not a Fed.

You know?

Anyway, let me talk about Cala Walsh.

So, Calla Walsh represents a kind of pipeline from the liberal direction.

Of acceptable uh manifestations of so-called anti-Zionism that are acceptable within institutions.

To a genuine anti-Zionist position, you can disagree with Cala about a million different things.

You can't say she's a Zionist, she's absolutely an anti-Zionist.

Okay, so i we can accept that Calla Walsh is an anti-Zionist, right?

It's basically common sense.

Um

But notice how her position is unacceptable within respectable society and its institutions, academia, the media, NGOs, activist culture.

Why is Cala Walsh persona non-grata within that world?

Why is she why is there this air of ominous oh, stay away from Cala, stay away from Cala.

Why is there this kind of ominous she's basically canceled when you fucking think about it?

She's not transphobic, she's not homophobic, she's not guilty of any of these Libtard sins.

They crucify people on the cross of.

So why is there this ominous air of Cala is no good?

Why is there this thing surrounding Cala Walsh?

Well, I'll tell you why.

Because she engaged in a qualitative.

Leap.

from institutionally accepted, whitewashed manifestations of anti-Zionism, which are just vaguely about some kind of support for Palestine, uh whatever, watermelon, uh you know, free Palestine, uh peace sign.

Kala supports the Axis of Resistance.

Kala went to Iran next to Iranian missiles.

Calla, very likely.

Uh endorses the Russian SMO, or at least rejects fully rejects the Kiev regime.

And it's the fact she aligns herself with military hard power, anti-hegemonic forces in the world.

That makes her persona non-grata because she has stepped out of the imperialist hegemony and she now aligns herself with the objective material forces of anti-imperialism.

I don't care how much you can launder a superficial, sanitized, activistic form of anti-Zionism within your local Democratic Party club.

I don't care how much you can launder it in your academic institutions.

I don't care how much you can have New York Times writers who are sympathetic to Gaza and are critical of Benjamin Netanyahu.

That doesn't matter ultimately.

When you make the leap and when you commit the step.

Of whitewashed forms of anti-imperialism, which are really just roundabout ways of morally sanctifying the imperialist machine when you think about it, to an objectively anti-imperialist position like Cala Walsh did, you will be canceled in the same fucking way that a right-winger who is anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist is, who, you know, post-Hitler edits or something.

You'll be filed in into the same canceled compartment or corner, and the same air of ominous distrust that looms over, you know, some kind of Jake Shields is going to loom over Calla Walsh.

Doesn't matter what she thinks about transgenders, nobody gives a fuck.

And why am I saying this, guys?

Because that's how we appraise revolutionary strategy.

Which populations are more equipped to absorb the cancellation that Calla Walsh has to go through?

Well, it's not the office HR employees that attend the No the No Kings protests.

I'm sorry, it's not.

I would expect that the people who can absorb

Uh being cancelled like Calla Walsh is, are the people

Uh who's

whose labor is uh valorized on the basis of material work and not affectivity and not emotions and not ideologies and not psychologies.

Like, you know, where you you you show up to the uh

I don't know, the sawmill or some shit.

You show up to some kind of fucking construction site.

And they don't ask you what your fucking opinion on X, Y, and Z is 'cause they don't give a fuck.

Can you fucking pick up a hammer and fucking uh hammer some nails in?

Can you fucking weld some shit?

Can you just fucking get this shit done?

This is a very vulgar, vulgar kind of Marxism I'm asserting right now.

I just see it as common sense.

How how who which demographics can handle being canceled like Calla Walsh's?

Sure, sure, the blue sky go to blue sky protests and radicalize people.

Get them to say free Palestine, get them to superficially endorse communist.

Oh, wa do you want to live in a stateless, classless society where yeah, get them to endorse all this shit.

Hell, maybe you'll even show em a Hakeem video and they'll change their mind about the Warsaw Pact ever so slightly, and they'll praise the achievements of Socialist Vietnam.

Maybe if you get them to that much of an extreme point.

But

On a mass level.

On a mass level.

Are they ready to join the deplorables, the cancelled?

Are they ready to be considered persona non grata in respectable, open society?

Um, like Cala is.

Are they ready for that?

Fuck no, they're not.

They're really not, and they'll never be.

Most of them will never be.

Those that.

You know what's so disgusting about the U.S.

left is.

It's so implicit that there's a line you never cross.

Never, ever, ever go so far as to do what Kala did.

Right?

Like, how many of these people would actually go to Iran?

How many of these people would actually take that radical step of being like, you know what?

I like Putin.

You don't even have to like Putin.

It's the principle.

It's what it represents.

It's this kind of fuck it.

What do I need to spell it out?

It's a kind of muscular opposition of some kind.

The minute you take a leap, you're like, oh shit, you're actually serious about this shit?

Oh, shit.

They're all like, oh, yeah, free Palestine.

Oh, shit.

You mean it?

Oh, fuck.

No, you're actually on some like, oh shit, you mean it?

Yeah.

I'm against uh capitalism.

I'm against imperialism.

I'm against oh shit, you mean it?

That's like you see the oh shit moment, it's a qualitative leap.

And I'm not talking about adventurism.

I'm talking about.

Getting to the point where you're actually gonna stand on some fucking business by way of commitment.

Meaning I'm gonna commit to a principle and to an authority that is fundamentally disaligned with the ruling institutions of society.

Even if I'm gonna be marginalized, even if I'm gonna be accused of being in a cult, or I'm gonna be accused of

Uh, being part of some shadowy Russian, whatever.

I mean, like, that leap is very different when you're actually like, listen, we have sympathizers in all of the institutions of society.

We absolutely in academia, in media.

I don't disrespect these people.

I understand you're living your fucking life.

You're not going to throw your life away for us.

And I don't.

I don't hate you for that.

But I'm re I don't I also don't consider you the exemplary class archetype that we have to win on a mass level.

And a lot of these people agree with me.

You know, when I talk to them, they'll be like, Look, Haas, I support you.

I support you guys.

You guys are great.

I just can't really throw my life away.

You know what I tell them?

I say, listen, bro, or listen, uh sister.

I never say that to women, but whatever.

Like, look, I

I'm gonna say I'm gonna say ones, ones, once.

Yeah, I'm gonna say, look, I get it, and it's not personal, and I don't even think less of you necessarily.

Because it's not an individual problem.

It's a class problem.

On a class level, you're just not part of the revolutionary, you're not the revolutionary subject, so to speak.

And that's okay.

Most people are not millennial narcissists who have to personally be the rev.

I'm a fucking streamer.

How many fucking streamers am I going to go radicalize?

You think I'm stupid?

Of course not.

I'm an exception.

So, you know, I'm a law student before I was a streamer.

How many fucking law students?

No, I'm an exception, not the rule.

You understand?

So, it's not a matter of personal hate.

I'm not a crazy person who fails to understand, yeah, we're going to have sympathizers all over, which is great.

And we support, we fuck with them heavy.

They do a lot of favors for us for sure.

They're great people.

But, uh,.

But they'll tell me the the plain truth.

They'll be like, Look, guys, the reason you guys will not be as accepted as the DSA are here, the reason you're gonna have a tougher time with the administration, the reason you guys it's gonna be harder for you, is 'cause, you know, you actually stand with Russia and China and North Korea and like you're actually on some real ass shit.

Like you you represent this like totally like you're you're actually like you mean it.

When you say you're a communist, the problem with you guys is you mean it in the sense that like no, you like straight up are this completely opposing principle

Um, versus our entire institution.

I mean, our institution can only be so flexible, but at the end of the day, you know, if you're actually seriously a communist, of course, you should expect persecution, you know.

So, Trayton, what's up?

And it's like there's an implicit understanding across the entire institutional left that this is the case.

There's an implicit understanding that if you're on some real ass shit, mm.

That's not how you play the Game of Thrones.

They think they're like these cynical HBO Game of Thrones characters.

You play the Game of Thrones.

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

You're just playing the long game.

Keep telling yourself that.

Um

So

Alright, y'all.

I'm on some high-energy shit.

I haven't slept.

I'm on some high-energy ass shit.

All right.

You guys understand?

I'm on some high-energy ass shit.

All right.

Um

Anyway, let's uh tell my eyes a little bit.

Wow, it's so much better.

That's much better.

Um anyway guys

Yeah, I mean this is the truth.

So we're very pragmatic when it comes to this.

Which populations and demographics can sustain the cancellation that Calla Walsh and we're going to use Calla Walsh as an example.

That Calla Walsh can suffer.

How many of them can openly at their workplace espouse Callawalsh rhetoric and ideas?

without fundamentally destroying their reputation socially.

Is it a welder or is it somebody who has to explain to Ethan Klein and other Zionist Jewish gatekeepers and apologize and kiss their ass about how much they're not an anti-Semite, how much they sympathize with the Jewish people, how much they uh support the Jews?

And you know, who has to do that versus who doesn't?

That's what you have to think about.

All right.

I mean like remember the whole Ethan Klein versus Hassan Piker beef?

I I could never imagine myself having to argue with Ethan Klein.

Who is he?

He's not even Ethan Klein.

Can you imagine if we had to like explain ourselves to Ethan Klein?

We don't have to explain.

We don't share the space.

Who do we have to?

We're not Redditors.

We don't have to explain a fucking thing, bitch.

Oh, but Stalin killed.

Okay.

Kim Jong-un's a dictator.

Uh uh uh what?

I'm sorry, like you're unironically like a fucking liberal, like unironically.

Like, not as a pejorative that we label these spineless lip tard leftists.

Like, no, no, you're actually a fucking lip tard.

Uh, just kill yourself, dude.

Like, what do you want me to tell?

I'm how what am I gonna say to this person like Ethan Klein?

What would I genuinely what would I say?

What would it okay, go kill yourself?

Like, what do you want me to do?

Why would I ever explain myself to a person like that?

What what what possible what could I possibly I couldn't even fathom having to apologize and explain myself to liberal Zionist Jews about anything.

Uh Hezbollah is based.

You who the fuck are you?

Like, you think I'm gonna sit here and like do apologia?

I'm not apologizing for shit, bitch.

Right?

I feel like I'm crazy.

Don't repeat the shit in Discord.

Anything I say in Discord, never repeat it.

Never repeat anything I say.

Um

No, but I'm just trying to say that yes, there's a pipeline that comes from the liberal left, but

The problem is that it can go very far, but when it runs up.

M S Paint?

Ones if y'all want some M M S Paint.

Ones if you want some M S Paint.

Y'all s y'all want some M S Paint?

Help me want some MS Paint.

I think we're gonna be asking about MS Paint, you know?

Uh

Look, I'll tell you the the the the pipelines to anti Zionism.

So d right.

Right.

Okay, I'm uh Professor Jong.

Okay, so you start as a two-stay solution liberal.

Uh and then you know you can go along the spectrum and you can be uh critical critical Netanyahu

Okay, and then you keep going.

And you can keep going and say that, you know, uh you believe that uh uh you know uh Palestine uh is oppressed

Uh you know uh uh and then you can go uh uh it's a there's a free Palestine watermelon.

Uh and and then you can go uh uh uh uh um you know um um

In Norman Finkelstein

And then you can go uh uh you know um

You can say that um

Okay, so this this uh spectrum that I'm uh showing you right now, this spectrum, we're going to call it the liberal pipeline.

Okay?

Liberal pipeline.

Okay?

And then we're going to call the vector right here anti-Zionism.

But we're going to crucially put the arrow right here, okay?

So

Okay, so so the more you're going this direction, okay, so you think if we go to no kings, this is very easy.

So this this pipeline is very easy.

This pipeline is quick and easy, okay?

It moves very fast.

The radicalization process is instantaneous.

All you have to do is get to this point, and the radicalization process is instantaneous, very smooth, very easy.

You can go to a no-kings protest and find a two-stage solution lib.

And there is a lot of fluidity, a lot of difficulty, not a lot of difficulty at all to get them from here to here.

It's very easy, it's very quick.

But what's the problem?

Okay.

The wall of Kala.

Okay?

The wall of Kala basically leads to this position of.

Uh let's just call it um

Let's say Iran.

'Kay.

The wall of Kala, okay?

So let's just say the um uh

Okay.

To uh pass the wall of Kala is.

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than get a libtard to pass through the wall

To uh overcome the wall of Cala.

Literally, okay?

So this is the problem.

This is the problem.

It is easier for a camel to.

It's really fucking hard.

It's not easy.

Do you understand?

Like, this is super easy.

There's so much conductivity and fluidity here.

It's super easy.

But there's a qualitative rupture of cancellation you have to pass through.

And liberals, it's extremely, it's almost impossible for them to pass the wall of Cala.

Okay?

Now, let's look at the MAGA pipeline.

All right.

So we're going to basically replicate this.

Oh okay.

We're gonna kind of replicate this.

And uh

And then we're gonna put the wall of Kala back, okay?

Okay, so I'm Professor Zhang.

I'm going to teach you how to do this, all right?

Wait.

No no no

Whoopsies

Okay.

Uh

This is the anti-Zionist vector.

Okay.

Right here, same thing, we're just going to copy and paste some of this.

Let's just call this the wall of um

This is kinda, we're going to include Tucker.

It's kind of not just the wall of Kala anymore.

It's also Tucker and so on.

Right?

Alright.

So.

Let's talk about the MAGA pipeline.

Maga Pipeline

So you start right here, which is

Yeah, you start here.

Alright, the evangelical slop.

So this is the wall of MAGA.

Or sorry, this is the MAGA pipeline.

Game.

Now, what's the crucial difference?

The difference is

There is no space within

Here for any anti-Zionism, not even nuanced.

Think about that.

So within the liberal kind of discourse, there is space.

Okay.

Within the liberal discourse, there's this kind of pipeline, Hassan Piker.

Pipeline that is very much possible.

All right.

Within the MAGA pipeline,

Uh there is no space

Let's just call this.

Okay, let's name the space.

Um.

Right.

Okay, let's just like say

Alright, so like there's two different forms of

Just call them DNC institutions.

So, within these institutions, there is a lot of fluidity.

Okay, you can go from here to here very easily.

I spelled his name wrong on purpose, whatever.

Um

Okay.

So now within the MAGO pipeline, within the uh i kind of institutional space, there is no space for anti-Zionism at all.

Okay?

So there's no motion.

You think no motion, right?

So in this case, you think there is no possibility of any kind of motion, right?

Wrong.

Wrong.

Because let me tell you, this is the fucking difference.

This is the difference.

Who understands?

You go from zero to one hundred right away.

Do you understand?

You go from zero to a hundred right away, you don't have to.

Uh

So once if you get it.

Uh, here, you can you can go here.

You could, the farthest you can take them is right here.

Okay, um, you will never breach the wall of Kala for the Libtards, but for MAGA, uh, I agree within the traditional institutions of the Republican Party, you'll never ever ever even be able to think about uh even this being critical of Netanyahu, not possible, but this red pill dynamic of being see the wall of the wall is breached.

Do you understand?

There's a breach in the wall.

So this wall is very solid.

You see?

This wall is very, very solid.

This wall i there's cracks in this wall.

There's a lot of cracks in this wall.

So they can flood through.

These cracks are very

Uh you know, porous.

So

To compare them, you know.

In this case

There are major cracks in the walls.

Hegemony that make

Consciousness, very sm instant, quick to develop.

Abruptly.

The walls are porous.

Am I spelling porous right?

Fuck my life.

Yeah, how do I spell it?

Hurry, hurry, hurry, spell porous.

Okay, I did it right.

All right.

Now uh in this case

In this case, the wall is basically completely solid.

To pass the wall means

to um

There are maybe some possible cracks, Cala.

But not on a mass level.

Now, here's the crucial thing.

Crucial thing, okay?

This is what they don't want you to know.

Past the wall of Kala, everyone becomes the same.

Well we um

You see?

Past the wall, everyone's the fucking same.

You make it out.

Doesn't, and by the way, it doesn't.

I'll put one porous crack here.

Um

And I'll put like right here.

See, like that's an example of that, you know?

I just fucking make this more clear.

You see?

So, uh who understands?

Ones if you get it.

Default MAGA

Uh our GOP consciousness is very unstable.

And prone to radicalization into something completely distinct.

Default Liptard consciousness is very closed to change.

Very stubborn.

Very conceited.

Very, uh, know it all.

Very moralistic, very hostile to, um

uh go beyond the boundaries of preprogrammed uh uh uh uh um

Uh

Steath and Klein effect, okay?

So

So I rest my case.

I'm the new Professor Jong, but a better version.

You get it?

Default MAGA GOP consciousness, super unstable, prone to radicalization into something completely distinct.

Uh default Lip Tar consonant is very closed, very stubborn, very conceited, very know-it-all.

It may be open to reputable uh

Liptards are highly open-minded to institutional actors, but they will are

It is almost impossible for them to break.

with the institutional reality.

Of institution the way Cala did.

You understand?

So, Cala is a major exception.

Cala totally fucking broke out, broke total prison break.

Most lip tards, it's impossible for them to do what Cala does.

And I'm not saying replicate Kala in terms of what she advocates for.

I'm saying, like, the way she just straight up is like Syria under Assad was part of the resistance, and the free Syria types are Zionists.

Bro, how many of these fucking free Palestine people on college campuses can straight up say, fuck the free Syria people?

Like, how many of them can be like, Assad?

Good.

None of them.

Because.

I'm I'm anti Zion I'm I'm pro I free Palestine, but also free uh you know, free Syria and and free uh uh Xinjiang and free Taiwan and free Ukraine.

Free the Kurds.

So, uh

This is the problem with, you know, the simplistic notion when our enemies say, oh, but you know, no kingspeople are more open-minded.

No, they're not.

This is their limit right here.

Their limit is basically right here, basically.

Like Norman Finkelstein, historical, basically applying 1619 project to Israel is their limit.

But they'll never go past the wall of Kala.

I'll say Assad.

They'll never fucking go past that wall.

You know?

They'll maintain the pretense of moral superiority.

They'll never go past the wall.

Though their limit is Mihi Hassan.

They'll never go past that.

They can't go past it.

Uh who the fuck can argue with this?

No one.

I had a major lecture planned on Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution and Marxism-Leninism and so on.

And why I haven't finished my book.

Um

I had a major lecture planned actually, um but it seems like we'll save that one for Thursday while we transition.

Or maybe I'll just have it now.

What time is it?

Uh we'll do an hour.

Okay.

Uh I wanna I want you guys to appreciate why I haven't

Finish the book.

And I want to talk about how

Basically

Uh

It's very hard to explain what exactly I do beyond being chairman of ACP.

What do I do as the infrared guy, right?

And, you know, I've been thinking about it.

And um

You know, so much of this is maintaining.

A very, very coherent

vision that is deeply um difficult to communicate in in any kind of like tangible, discrete way.

And yeah, it's some cult leadership.

I un I I understand that.

But

To have the infrared vision, you have to have a certain aesthetic, you have to have a certain kind of visual universe that you're maintaining that's combined with a specific kind of elicitation of mental states, psychologies, narrative, you know, the actual effective communication of a narrative that successfully communicates and imparts a specific psychological disposition, a specific imaginary kind of effect, specific

imaginary universe, right?

And uh you know, uh a kind of specific trajectory as far as communicating meaning, right?

And this is kind of the essence of what I do when you think about it.

I basically spend a lot of my time.

uh maintaining how it all comes together in one big coherent vision and uh making sure that we are properly on course as far as

Not simply the direction we're going in in terms of simple goals to be fulfilled, like are we going to take power at this point or this time, not simply at the level of reaching a certain educational level, but basically maintaining a specific kind of subjectivity that allows us to perceive the possibility of a very specific future.

Right?

Maintaining the sensibility, more or less, the sensibility of a completely new revolutionary outlook, a very specific way of looking at the world and responding to its various contradictions.

Now, unless everyone is here because of how handsome and good-looking I am, the fact that you are here proves that I have managed to do this to some extent successfully.

In the strict sense that you see it as well.

You see how this shit makes sense, basically.

Like, it makes sense for you.

The sensibility of this position for you could not possibly entirely depend on my person, you know, personally or physically.

That would be ridiculous.

That would basically be that everyone just likes me so much just because of my charming smile or something.

I it's not true.

You guys, I've communicated something to you that you're, you know, you're picking up what I'm putting down.

You see what I see to some extent, at least to some extent, right?

And um

Uh but there you know, at the level of um how we justify that vision to society, that's when we have some measure of difficulty, right?

That's when it it's just there's

Unfortunately, I think this community, the majority, overalling majority, presupposes the fact that they came from a Marxist or a communistic leaning background.

So

The specific message that I share is a specific message that presupposes already, on some basic level.

Recognizing the meaningfulness of the communist experience in the 21st century and today.

I am kind of like a Martin Luther kind of message, right?

I I have a message that there's a deep corruption, something has gone terribly wrong, the revisionists have completely repudiated any semblance of Marxism, that Marxism, the real Marxism, has been forgotten.

And so on and so on.

And uh this is what there's something very powerful about my message because of the specific narrative, right?

The specific narrative about how the Soviet Union has gone in 1991, but today uh we cannot say

It's all said and done.

That communism, in some sense, is still objectively relevant.

And that, in fact, world history and even the cosmos itself.

Uh

Is with us, right?

There's something very powerful about the narrative that

mm, the mainstream popularity of communist or socialist ideas on the Internet and online is fundamentally a psyop, right?

That mainstream liberal leftism is fundamentally uh at odds with

The historical communist tradition.

Now, the reason I feel like that's a very powerful narrative is because.

It's also the fact that there's a revolutionary essence of communism that has been forgotten today.

The majority of communist parties worldwide, barring the ones in power, are revisionists.

They're sellouts.

Like this exemplary case was the CPUSA.

I mean, I shit you not.

I remember.

When the CpSA issued a letter condemning infrared.

And this was in November 2021.

And I went live on Twitch with like a thousand concurrent viewers.

Why did a thousand people care about this?

I was so shy.

Like, this is so niche.

Why do you why who the fuck are all these people who care about this?

And then I realized, like, well, it's the narrative that people cared about.

Even people who weren't communists were invested in the story that was unfolding.

And I mean, a lot of you are here because you remember the story of what happened.

You have the record is straight for you.

You guys were here very open-minded.

Maybe you weren't right or die.

But then you saw how people started reacting to the message, expecting maybe somebody could debunk Haz, maybe somebody could actually respond to him or debate him.

And then the ways they would have to go out of their way to.

Lie basically and do pull all these dirty, dishonest tricks.

I feel like it radicalized a lot of you, right?

And that's a narrative.

That's absolutely part.

I'm not saying it's a narrative in some postmodern sense of it's devoid of objectivity.

It's absolutely objective.

But you guys witnessed some shit, right?

In any case, um that is a story.

That's a story that is not theory.

That is a story which is not simply adjut prop and aesthetics.

That's a story that is real, that we're a part of.

It's a real fucking story.

The story of this fucking movement is very real, okay?

It's very real.

Um

The one who raised the question, me, of why is it

That Communists have become spine self-proclaimed Communists have become spineless cowards and sellouts.

And why have they fundamentally become divorced from the masses?

What excuses are there really for the decline of the Communist movement?

And fuck it, we could go farther.

Why did the USSR dissolve in 1991?

If I'm relitigating these questions and saying that there's some fuckery afoot, that something is wrong here, there's a fundamental injustice and betrayal.

Right?

That is at the heart of this.

Um there's something very, very powerful and compelling about that.

But that story, that story is not a book, it's not a documentary, although maybe it could be, in all honesty, that would probably be the best thing it could be.

But it's not an aesthetic.

First, it's a story.

First, it's the structure of a narrative and a story.

And

Um, that's something that I am not creating.

I am not an educator who's creating a story and feeding it to you because I'm part of the story myself.

I'm just keeping account and speaking the truth about what's happening or what has happened as far as.

We are concerned, right?

And uh

Now w w what am I talking about here?

Um

Keeping a correct record of

This narrative or this story

and continually reaffirming

Exactly how we can respond to the world as it is.

Is a feat.

I can't talk about it without being cringe, but it it is kind of like um like meme warfare type of thing.

Like you have to have the right memes always.

You have to have the right vision of what is our current orientation, what memes are we communicating, how do we like maintain that we're on proper course with respect to the um

uh to the production of memes, basically.

Like are is the shit we're putting out reflective of the correct path or not?

And this is not simply at the level of theory, it's not simply at the level of aesthetics, and it's not simply at the level of telling a story, it's all of those things combined.

Do you understand?

Kind of like mimetic engineering.

It kind of, but it's it's very authentic in the sense it's it's it's truthful.

It's not like you're doing it to manipulate people.

You're trying to communicate a kind of integral preconceptual subjective disposition or position, right, with respect to the facts of the history of the world so far and the world we live in today.

I know this a lot of this sounds so like ambiguous, but if you know concretely what our positions are, you should fill in the blanks.

Um

And uh like the move, so to speak, for me is maintaining all of that, which is a tremendous amount of energy as far as I'm concerned.

Synthesizing how all of this comes together into a position that it is possible for you and hundreds and thousands of other people to have.

Um

And thinking about

Thinking about what the next signifier is going to be or is objectively.

And a signifier.

I spent years before infrared even started obsessing over um the Lacanian notion of a signifier, right?

And um

Specifically, you know, I don't wanna get into it.

This kind of

Uh notion of the discovery or emergence of a new signifier, right?

You don't know what that means, that's okay, you don't have to.

What?

Signifiers are basically the preconceptual

A register that we have that communicates to us continuously, meaning it's not just in one time that we see a sign and then whatever.

It's continuous kind of um absorption and uh registration, so to speak.

At the unconscious level, right?

So at a preconceptual, even not necessarily strictly rational level of conscious, rational thinking, of

What?

um, is meaning?

Like, what is the basis upon which all of our language rests, right?

Orvo, what's up?

So if I say, for example, this is a pair of glasses, when I say meaning, I'm not saying it's like, what is meaning in the sense of

uh you know what I should live for.

It's more like how can I meaningfully refer to this as an intelligible thing and when I speak about it, situate that

reference uh within a kind of

Wider cosmos.

For example, this is a pair of glasses simultaneously means it's also not this cup of tea, and it's not this cell phone, and it's not this, and it's different in this and that way.

And here's how the glasses fit into my life.

I wear them, I go outside with them, I read this book.

And you know, this is a cosmos, so this is a matrix of meaning, right?

And it's not given.

We go through life thinking that's given to us, and it's just like a fact of nature, it's just a fact of the universe, so to speak.

But it's not.

It's that order specifically, we have to continuously affirm our place within it, and it itself has to continuously disclose.

Uh, itself to us for us to partake in it, right?

And if you don't believe me, look at schizophrenics.

A schizophrenic cannot meaningfully talk about this pair of glasses.

A schizophrenic will say, This pair of glasses is also the pair of glasses that unfolds in a dimetrical way.

And when I put it on here, I'm also putting it in my pants, and I'm also putting it on my hair.

And I'm also, the aliens are also wearing it right now, and you're wearing it.

And while you're looking at me, and the guy right there is also wearing these glasses, and I'm wearing right.

There's a breakdown of the ability to basically, um.

uh situate the order of signification within an order, right?

There's a breakdown of the order.

There's a breakdown of this kind of metanumic chain of signifiers.

Everything slips into everything else indistinguishably.

And the fact that there are schizophrenics and psychotics proves that our sanity, right, our the way we participate into this cosmos in this world, is not given by virtue of nature, by virtue of something that is just devoid of labor, devoid of energy.

Right?

It's contingent, it ha it has conditions, it's dependent.

So

You know, the question of the signifier is that ultimately all of our all of the things in our world that we experience, all of the determinate given things, from this pair of glasses to Mao Zedong's little red book, quite literally anything, right?

All of them fit within a specific cosmos.

But the cosmos itself isn't fixed.

Meaning.

I guess if you want to put it in Marxist terms, all of this fits within a very specific way in which human beings reproduce their conditions of subsistence as a definite form of life activity, right?

To quote Marx from the German ideology.

But these conditions of subsistence, this mode of production, is itself suspended in a process of change, okay?

And it's it's not fixed.

And so what we call the cosmos here in this case is not something that is fixed.

The cosmos itself is suspended.

fully and entirely.

But what is it suspended in?

Okay.

That's the question.

It's like that.

It's like in Twin Peaks.

I think it's Monica Bellucci, something.

She asked David Lynch.

She says everything is a dream, but then she says Who is the dreamer, right?

And twin peaks to return.

Well, who's the dreamer?

It's kind of the same question: for what is all of this moving?

Okay, everything suspended in motion.

For what?

Why?

What glues together the meaningfulness of my entire world and my entire universe?

It can't be something that pre-exists me, uh or in the sense uh uh pre-exists my activity.

Because my activity actively participates in it, right?

And reproducing it.

So what is it?

What is the thing that compels the movement of the heavenly bodies, so to speak?

What is the thing that compels the movement of all of the things that we do in our life?

All of the ways in which we make meaningful sense of the

Things around us as they register in our unconscious as signifiers.

Well, the idea is that there's a master signifier, right?

There's a metanumic chain of okay, how do you define any given thing?

Is that it's not this other thing?

And there's a kind of chain of signification that is based on metanumy.

Everything is because of the nexus and matrix of what it is not, right?

And so okay.

Um

Okay, but ultimately there's a referentiality with respect to the signifier of signification itself.

There's a specific signifier whose sole signification is the order itself, the order of the symbolic order, right?

So that's the master signifier for Lacan, which he is developing within the kind of Oedipal framework.

So, for example, this is why in Freudian psychoanalysis, the relationship to the father is very much related to sanity.

Okay?

If you if you um have

a problem with your father or something and you have this big issue, this big chip on your shoulder, specifically if you're a man, it's kind of a vector to in the direction of psychosis and schizophrenia.

You lose you lose reality itself, you know?

But the reason for that is because a father usually takes the form within the interpolation of subjectivity as a master and communicates the master signifier, right?

That's where the master signifier, that's from where the master signifier is communicated.

I don't want to get into psychobabble because I hate that, right?

Um and I don't want you guys to ask any questions before I'm fucking finished with this shit.

For real.

Don't derail me because the ability for me to deliver this lecture is already very difficult because I am.

Awake for a very long time, okay?

Uh speaking of which, I have to project my fucking eyes.

Anyway, um

So, that's the meaning of a master signifier, right?

Well, in the Oedipal framework,

When the master signifier is no longer um

Uh, uh, when the Oedipal structure, so to speak, of the Baromean knot, the symbolic, the imaginary, the real, kind of breaks down, and the process of the you know, uh, movement of desire to drive, when you realize that behind all of my desires and fantasies, there is just this kind of specific drive, right, which is not necessarily based on the attainment of a specific imaginary uh outcome.

Freud's Oedipal complex is, I'm not going to even talk about it because it's pretty gross, but you know.

The so-called psychoanalytic cure for Lacan kind of ends with a type of subjective destitution.

Instead of the classical Freudian case where you just become a healthy whatever, Lacan says the Oedipal complex is fundamentally pathological, and the way to kind of escape its symptom is through something he calls subjective destitution, right?

Subjective destitution is more or less.

The realization that the uh

the big other itself, so to speak, as this kind of uh omnipresent symbolic order of the they out there, right?

It itself does not know itself.

And

In the

I I don't know how to explain this in a way that you'll actually fucking understand.

More or less, you cease to regard yourself as the subject of the symbolic order, and you begin to rela recognize in the relationships of signifiers to themselves something objective that is just not about you specifically.

Okay?

Now, Lacanians will shoot me for simplifying it in that way, but I don't give a fuck.

I invite them to simplify it in a better way.

Um

In any case, uh

Now, okay, fuck, there's like so much I just threw out there.

Bringing it all back in.

Ultimately

Ultimately, the what we can call a master signifier, which signifies only the

Symbolic order itself, the order of signifiers, right?

Signifiers of the unconscious.

How that comes to emerge and how that comes to be.

is through the communication of for what it is all for in some sense.

And for what it is all for, if you have a dialectical view, is a specific process, a specific circuit, and that is the wisdom, okay?

Uh, that is the kind of object of wisdom, I should rather say.

Not wisdom itself, it's the object of wisdom.

Meaning, when you get it and you understand what life is really for, put it this way: I'm gonna explain this to you in an extremely vulgar, retarded, like um Nietzschean, Buddhist, pseudo-intellectual, retard view, right?

Imagine you're like some Buddhist guy who goes to Tibet and you want to discover the enlightenment and the meaning of life, right?

And then you sit around and you're you have your legs crossed and then you meditate for 10,000 years and you do all the stupid things, carry this water to the pond and carry it back 10,000 times, and then you will learn, okay.

But then suddenly you have an epiphany through undergoing some kind of rigorous.

process of initiation and discovery and enlightenment and so on.

And then you have the epiphany, the aha moment that says, This is what it's all fucking for.

I understand now, right?

I understand for what everything moves.

That stupid cliche.

Now, forget a don't be attached to that scenario that I gave to you in any kind of way.

But if you get the gist of this idea that there's a specific kind of rhythm of being, there's a specific pattern, specific resonance, and a specific kind of dialectical logic and structure underlying all determinations.

Um

Then

You can understand what is meant by a word like logos, right?

That's what logos is.

Logos is what you discover at the epiphany moment.

Ah, I have I have found the logos, I have found the fundamental pattern and structure that underlies existence, right?

Um

And it's just that, that's the word.

Logos is the word.

Okay?

The master signifier.

And that's what glues together the entire signifying chain.

That's what glues together my ability to meaningfully situate the meaningfulness of a pair of glasses, a cup of tea, a cell phone, a Lennon's statue, a book, all within one universe that they all exist within, by the way.

And I can say this is not that and that is not this because this is something I wear on my head and this is something I drink and this is something I use and this is something I read and this is something who someone who represents and so on and so on.

The ability for all of that to fit together into one matrix or world of meaning or cosmos depends upon the fact that all of this fulfills some kind of greater pattern, some kind of greater, that some kind of greater logos underlies all of it.

Ultimately, like if you want to think about it like this, this is not correct philosophically, but it's like if you want to understand how everything could fit and be part of something greater.

Let's say you're like that for you, the meaning of life is that you want to become the world's biggest.

Uh, a power lifter or some shit, right?

Well, in that case, it's like, look, how does the pair of glasses all fits together?

Because, you know, for me to be a great power lifter, I have to protect my eyes from the sun and I have to have a cell phone so I could talk to my coach and all this kind of thing.

There's a specific goal of your entire life that you are subordinating all the existence within your field of view to, right?

It's very easy to understand.

Something like that.

But instead of thinking about a goal that for you is the meaning of life, like this is my goal, instead of thinking about it in terms of a goal.

Think about it as something like more existential.

This is objectively.

The reality that I'm part of, the world that I'm part of.

This is objectively just what it is.

This is the nature of what it is, right?

And it has the kind of same structural significance that a personal goal for you can have because it's structuring the order of your world.

You know, it's ultimately situating everything within some kind of story that has a beginning, middle, and end, or a song, if you will, or any kind of kind of structure, structured process or circuit, right?

And that is a dialectic, right?

All determinations are themselves.

Um only meaningful within the context of the fulfillment of some kind of.

Um dialectical process.

So for example

And that process we call revolutionary.

Why?

Because revolutions come full circle.

But a revolution comes full circle.

in such a way that you don't even know what your starting point was.

When you return to your starting point, something new has been realized, a new qualitative determination.

Revolutions by nature have

a structure.

They have a beginning, a middle, and an end.

They are finite.

Every revolution that you can name has an end.

Revolutions necessarily must end.

Crucially, I'm saying revolutions.

Do you understand?

Now the stupidity of the idea of a permanent revolution

Is that every revolution is a particular process?

Revolutions must end.

So there can't be a permanent revolution.

Otherwise, uh you have stasis.

R revolutions move, right?

But all movement, when all is said and done, takes a circular uh form.

All movement does.

Ask any uh uh m m uh uh what do you call a fucking

J a a mathematician who specializes in geometry.

A geometrist?

The fuck, what do you say?

A geometer?

I don't I don't believe that.

A geometer, is that real?

A a topologist, should say a topologist or a physicist or a mathematical uh mathematician, all understand that all motion takes a circular form.

All motion does.

Uh there's no such thing as an infinite vector motion that just kind of goes in one direction without in some kind of sense uh undergoing uh uh uh uh circling back, so to speak, right?

Because if it's truly a rate of change, continuous rate of change in motion, then.

When you model that spatially, it takes the form of like a circle or something or a spiral or something like that.

Uh in any case

I'm just I have flashbacks to fucking Pestomheim's when Pestomime was in the Schiller and they were telling me the LaRouche people were telling me about circles I was like well they got that from Leibniz by the way.

They it's it's Leibnizian kind of yeah, sine wave.

Sure.

Anyway, um

Sorry, I just had some flashbacks there.

So uh this is the truth.

that permanent revolution is stupid.

But does that mean when a revolution is over that the that that we can say that the principle the revolution

Now if all revolutions have to come to an end, ones if you can hear

Okay, if all revolutions have to come to an end, the Trotskyites took this to mean the abandonment of the revolutionary principle entirely.

That Marxism-Leninism abandons the revolutionary principle because and that the revolution coming to an end is the acquiescence of the kind of revolutionary dialectic to bourgeois metaphysics and stasis.

And so they attempt to depict Stalinism and Marxism Leninism as ossifying and static and devoid of that kind of original, inceptual, revolutionary vigor and fire.

But what they don't understand is that

When revolutions come to an end,

That doesn't mean motion ends, that doesn't mean the processual structure of the revolution disappears, it means it takes a kind of cyclical form.

And thereby referring to it as a revolution becomes superfluous.

Why?

Because it has become a qualitative determination.

And that's the essence of socialism in one country.

Socialism in one country was the October Revolution becoming

A qualitative determination, right?

In this case, the USSR as a country, okay, as a socialist country.

And this is more revolutionary.

This is more revolutionary.

When the revolution ends, that doesn't mean it's less revolutionary than when it begins.

In fact, it's more revolutionary.

When a revolution truly is completed, it's more revolutionary than when it began, because it finally becomes a qualitative determination, something it was not before.

And then finally, it clarifies.

What is Revolutionary Cosmos?

Revolutions clarify what truly is Revolutionary Cosmos.

In the same way that monotheism clarifies what truly is God, God is not this statue, He is not this specific form on earth, God is something beyond, right?

In the same way, revolutionary cosmos is always beyond.

Revolutionary cosmos can never be reduced to a specific revolutionary process.

And every time a revolutionary process is fulfilled and completes, it should deepen our appreciation of the true revolutionary cosmos, which is always the integral whole.

It's never a specific process, it's never a specific circuit of change.

It is the all, and the all can never by default can never be reduced to its parts, right?

Okay, there was the revolution completed in the USSR, but also it began in China, okay?

The revolution in China completed, but also it began where Iran.

So

Uh this is the true appreciation of a kind of ontological principle of revolution.

The Trotskyites never actually were able to comprehend because they could never make peace with the fact that revolutions do end.

They do have a beginning and end.

They have a structure.

They have a rhythm.

They have a life cycle.

Who understood this?

Who was a Stalinist before Stalin?

Ibn Khaldun, right?

And his Makamuda, I think.

I've talked about it many times where he talks about the cyclical structure of dynastic change, revolutionary dynastic change.

So, this, he said, a dynasty is like an organism, right?

It has a beginning, a middle, and end.

Alchemy, precisely.

Yes, yes, what we're talking about is what the alchemists refer to as a kind of great work, right?

There is a processual logic.

There.

That is structured.

And by the way, this is a specific articulation of logos.

That's all Logos is.

Logos is when we give a name to a revolutionary process that is Logos.

The Logos underlying being is.

The structure and the pattern

of transformation that underlies all things.

Uh so why am I saying all this?

Well

In relation to why I can't finish my book.

Few things.

One, and I I will finish it, don't worry.

But I want to communicate something very clearly before I do.

Um

First of all,

The task today, my task, has always been

The discovery and the ability to communicate with systemic redundancy.

A specific logos that makes sense of the entire Communist experience thus far.

Uh this is the mission of Infrared from the very beginning.

For what did all of this happen?

Mm what does it mean to be a Marxist-Leninist?

In the post-COVID world and in the 21st century, for a new era.

And how do we make sense of socialism with Chinese characteristics, for example?

How do we make sense of the current vector of the development of world history?

A lot of big words, I understand.

Grand, vague references, I understand.

But how.

Do we synthesize?

All the revolutionary experience of modern history to this point.

As something that is meaningfully compelled by a single

Logos.

The thing that glues together and situates within some kind of cosmic order.

Everything.

Okay, I use the example of glasses and tea and so on and so on.

It's the same for history, though.

How do we fit the October Revolution?

Uh, what had experienced in China, the entire revolutionary communist experience, 1979 in Iran, everything, right?

How do we?

How does that all become part of one cosmos that makes sense of why everything took on the d trajectory, the logic that it did, the logic that it did?

Okay, logic, logos.

It's the same fucking thing.

What is the underlying

rationality behind how things have unfolded thus far in the way they have.

And what does that say about how we can authentically reflect and relate to being now in an infinitesimal now?

What is the world we live in?

And what du what do the facts of

Recent modern history proof about the fundamental nature of humanity and life and all these giant questions itself.

And that's always been the fucking mission of Infrared.

Vex, I really disagree.

Again, and this is the problem.

You're misunderstanding me.

It's not your fault, though.

The problem is there's a vagueness that I can't fill.

And that's onto the topic of why I don't always have the morale to just power.

I could power through finishing the book tomorrow, right?

I'm very careful about every fucking word, every fucking sentence.

I'm so careful when I write.

And I'll tell you why.

Um

No, the universe is not the fatherland.

Okay, I just please.

You know what I don't like that came out of infrared?

I don't like Christian schizophrenia.

There's a specifically Christian schizophrenia I don't like.

Just be a normal Christian, please.

Christian schizophrenia has never added anything of value to this community.

Okay?

And you guys are making a strong case for just Islam.

I'm not even lying.

If your only way to reconcile Christianity with the shit that I say is schizophrenia, just become Muslim.

Because it's a simplicity.

There's no Trinity.

It's just like a simplicity Tawweed and so on and so on.

And it's like much neater than the schizophrenic shit you guys say sometimes.

And I say that as somebody who, in some sense, also thinks of themselves as a Christian.

And of course, has an immense respect for the Christian religion.

But sometimes you guys.

Are very much not synthesizing things, and you're content with just like, I don't know, it's a schizophrenia for sure.

It's schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia pushes, okay, fuck it.

If it works, it works.

I'm not going to police it.

If your fucking Christian schizophrenia works, more power to you.

But I'm trying to say something a lot simpler, okay?

Uh

Alright.

Anyway.

Let me continue.

Only atheist.

No, of course not.

Okay, look, because Christianity is not schizophrenic.

Christianity is.

Uh, in practice, Christianity is not, it makes it makes complete sense in practice, Christianity.

The problem is.

It leads to a kind of when it's divorced from the praxis of the Christianity, which is what?

The church congregation.

It's a perfectly simple thing, right?

But people are trying to create.

Okay, I'm.

I'm trying to put something down, and you're picking up something schizophrenic sometimes, right?

And it's because you.

Are trying to translate into a kind of um conceptual world.

Right, in the world of concepts.

uh a specific logical rational structure.

But what I'm trying to communicate to you is a preconceptual kind of sublime meaningfulness that maybe you have to be a Muslim to understand.

I'm not gonna say that because zero Muslims understand anything I fucking say and only Christians understand what I say to any extent, right?

Um

What about being spirit?

Listen, I don't care about labels.

I really don't.

The day any fucking religious label divides any of us, I'm going full fucking league of militant atheists.

I don't give a fuck.

The minute any fucking religious label divides this army, we're going full militant atheist.

You understand?

The minute there's any religious prejudice or sectarianism, my religion is better than yours, including if it ever came from me, which it never will.

I'll never fucking say Islam is better than Christianity.

I'll never fucking say any shit.

Okay?

These religions are supposed to guide and magnify our revolutionary faith.

And our unity.

In any case.

Um

I have no problem.

Um

It's because I have the revolutionary faith that

I have no problem with any real religion.

And so many people will find me suspicious.

How can you go in a church and be okay, Haas?

How can you go in a mosque?

And you're, what are you really?

Are you a Freemason?

No, I have the revolutionary faith.

Which makes sense of all the faiths to me.

Uh in any case

Let me continue.

My sermon, right?

uh how can you attain and communicate this logos?

That's the question.

Now I'll tell you how infrared has approached this.

How has infrared attempted to communicate this

Mm.

Revolutionary logos, right?

The thing for which it all moves.

And of course movement never ceases, but for what do things move?

For example, the heavenly bodies move.

For what?

For the sun, of course, right?

Uh they revolve around something.

So for what do revolutions revolve?

Now logos, let's play with words here a little bit, do some trickery.

It's like logo.

And you think about in today's global economy, a logo

Has this significance?

A logo.

is the sun for which so many different

Processes of production and supply chains move and function to fulfill a brand or a logo.

It's like think about Disney as a brand, just as a brand and just as a logo.

Is Disney a specific tangible commodity or a product?

No, but the symbol of Disney, when you see that brand, you're looking at an entire network of global processes of production and specific supply chains, all that are made to realize something that is intangible, a logo, a specific world, right?

And these logos, these brands,

They are like cults.

I mean, Disney is building neighborhoods, or they built neighborhoods you fucking live in.

It's a specific way of life.

Every brands acquire at a certain level a transcendent status.

McDonald's is a specific sign of an entire fucking set of habits and cultures and conventions and ways of life.

Disney is, it's a fucking vibe.

You see, this person's a fucking Disney adult.

I could tell you what fucking toothbrush they use.

I could tell you what fucking underwear that they buy.

I could tell you what fucking habits they have, how they pick their ass.

Everything.

Starbucks, I mean, you fucking name it.

These brands, logos, they are like celestial bodies that can determine an entire matrix and nexus of different ways of life and habits that define people, right?

And they have this transcendent status.

Logos becomes a kind of super commodity, right?

In any case.

And the more successful a brand is, the more it encompasses a wider division of labor and division of consumption.

The more, you know, a brand, and everyone knows this, the more successful a brand gets, like Apple, for example.

Apple is a cult.

Apple has a specific prescription about the meaning of life.

Apple, the more successful Apple becomes, you're going to have Apple homes, Apple cars, Apple toilets, Apple underwear, Apple grocery store, Apple everything, right?

Unfortunately, Apple's not successful enough to rise at that level.

But you want to know who fucking was?

Amazon.

Can you give me a single fucking thing, single fucking industry, a single fucking division of labor that Amazon doesn't have its toes dipped in?

Fuck, some of these guys are even getting into military, right?

Um

So, but this is the nature of today's global economies.

And it all revolves around logo, okay?

Logos.

Okay.

And all logos is, is a specific structure of meaning through narrative.

Okay.

Not just through narrative, through it's a logic of reproduction.

It's a logic of production and reproduction.

How do we make sense of our cycles, our ways of life, and so on and so on, right?

Um okay.

You wanna know another logo was?

You wanna know another transcendent logos logo is the CPC in China.

It's the most advanced one that exists in the world today, actually.

The most powerful bra it's a transcendental brand.

You wanna know who else is trying to be in a transcendental brand?

The AC motherfucking P.

Okay?

You fucking get it?

You understand?

And a transcendent a truly transcendental brand.

Is beyond the superfice of the phenomenal world.

Transcendental brands are transcendent.

They communicate a kind of rhyme, a specific deeper order, a deeper kind of relationality, not simply a specific aesthetic, the deeper logic behind an aesthetic.

Do you fucking understand?

Not only the deeper logic behind the aesthetic,

The deeper order within which that exe aesthetic exists within.

Okay, so uh let's go back to infrared for one moment.

Infrared

Is symbol is uh uh a globe, a world, right?

Represents a world.

Infrared believed in the beginning.

That we could

Communicate this kind of new logos, new signifier, and it would have to be a full spectrum attack.

It would have to be a full spectrum multimedia space that we occupy.

And here's why.

Let's now get to the book thing.

When I write in a book, I have a very specific intention as far as what specific visuals I want to pop into your head, what specific feelings I want to elicit into you, what specific evocations I want to make, what specific signifiers.

That I communicate, and which specific chain of signifiers do those fit within.

Now, if I'm writing about apples in a basket, maybe I find it implicit that you're going to think about Little Red Riding Hood or some shit.

Who carries a fucking apple with baskets?

I don't fucking know.

Anyway, but maybe implicitly, I just have this assumption that this is where it fits within your chain of signifiers at the level of your register, right?

But that assumption is never justified because everyone has different experiences, first of all.

More specifically, everyone has different media consumption habits.

I don't know all the fucking movies you've watched.

I don't know all the fucking shit you've consumed.

I don't know all the music you fucking listen to.

I don't know all the subcultures you've been exposed to.

In the heydays of the written form and in literature, let's say the 19th century, the 18th century, there was more of a uniformity as far as the cultural experiences that people would have.

Yes, there was a huge diversity, but it was segmented in terms of class, for example, very predictably.

And it was just, you know, people living in some bum fuck.

Nowhere place.

Would have similar kinds of experiences.

So there's all these kinds of psychosocial, imaginary, the threshold of imaginary experiences.

All these kinds of things determine how you're going to make meaningful sense of a written text.

So for me, I could write a paragraph and it evokes something very specific, very specific for me.

But for you,

It's completely fucking different.

Like, I'll write something that has a message.

Like, this is the message.

Every time I fucking read it, it reminds me of a specific logos of images and narratives, and it ends with a conclusion that's like, that's the fucking move.

That's it, right?

But for you, okay, for me, it's like, okay, I want to communicate the serene majesty of, you know,

Bands of desert nomads rising and conquering in kind of effecting this beautiful justice, and there's this kind of moral fulfillment.

And then I write that paragraph, and you read it, and you're like, oh, it's still like Kona and the barbarian, we're just going to kill everyone.

I don't know.

It's like the vibe for you is different than what it is for me.

Because.

Because the signifiers are sliding on entirely different chains, chains of signifiers.

Why?

Because

Uh you're you're pre-given um

Media literacy and sensibilities are just going to be different from mine and vice versa, and there's no way to overcome that gap.

today you know and of course the internet fucking changed it big time

Big time.

Internet changed that big time.

Um, like Orvo said, you know.

It's made it so I've I've lost faith in the idea that I could write a book

And successfully impart to you what I'm trying to say, so to speak.

And the best proof of that is the fact that Karl Marx wrote books, Lenin wrote books, Stalin wrote books, Mao wrote books.

Hey, Mao wrote books.

How if Mao wrote books, and today there are transgender furries who read that shit and go, Oh, yeah, Mao's a transgender furry.

How mean, how precise is the medium of text in being able to communicate your intentions?

Really?

How precise could it possibly be if

The amount of wiggle room and diversity and variance of interpretations are possible, right?

So, to control for all of the multifarious interpretations that come with the written medium.

You have to explore visual media.

You have to explore music and visual media and presenting what you're presenting in a specific narrative and chain of events, which is what Infrared did with our Infrared Vision videos when we launched.

You know, like that's the idea.

But then I realized something: there's a missing piece as far as being able to communicate.

Which is, how does a guy fucking make sense of this?

Okay, I was pushed to live streaming because.

A crucial missing piece of the puzzle is like, how does a fucking guy process this shit?

How are you expected to process it?

What kind of emotions should you have?

How do you?

There's no way you're gonna fucking learn that until you look at me.

There's so much that I communicate that's beyond just what I tell you.

For example, when I laugh, when I mock something, when I react positively or negatively, when I get angry, when I fucking crash out, all of these things.

Are imprinting upon you a specific sensibility of, like, okay, this is a pattern, I can make meaningful sense of this pattern.

Do you understand that?

And for you, it makes sense.

It kind of fulfills a crucial part of logos for you, right?

That's why today's generations entirely get their entire personality for streamers.

You didn't get your entire personality from me, but you got a lot of your understanding of how to be a communist from me.

Ones, if that's fair to say.

A lot of your, not, I'm not going to even say all.

A lot of your understanding of how to meaningfully make sense of what it means to be a communist.

I think you got a lot of that from me, right?

Now, thankfully for you, all the other aspects of being a human being you didn't get from me.

And I hope you didn't, by the way, because there's a lot of things that I wouldn't want to impart upon others.

But for this generation, every aspect of their personality they're getting from influencers and streamers.

I mean, down to the most minute levels of

You know, their consumption habits and even the type of fucking women that they like and all this other kind of shit, right?

You guys have your diversity of tastes and music and all this other kind of shit.

You don't fully emulate me in every respect, and I'm glad.

But that's not the tendency of today.

Today, the tendency is people are modeling their entire existence off of watching influencers.

Well, why?

Because that's the universe for them.

That's where they're getting that master signifier.

They can't get it from their fathers and their parents anymore because their parents are not adapted civilizationally to the society that we live in because they don't know how to fucking type and send an email.

So how could they meaningfully participate in society and today's level of the threshold of productive forces and relations of production if A, boomers don't know how to use the technology and B, are not culturally adapted to it meaningfully?

And then there's another feature of boomers is that they are, their imagination is very limited in terms of like they're not able to actually understand the threshold of different affectivities, psychological states, emotions, and ways of playing with signifiers that younger people are.

Jen A had how do you explain to a seven-year-old man tung tung tung sohur?

Like, how do you fucking explain it?

Like, you can't.

It's clearly somewhat meaningful.

Um and it does kind of mean something, but it's like

What it really means is that there's this level of a dynamic range of being able to impart and communicate affectivities, psychological states, and signifiers without having to actually explain yourself.

That's kind of the point.

Whereas boomers think that there's a narrative, there's a specific form of narrative structure attached to everything meaningful.

Like for them, they can't just show them a picture of John Pork and expect them to be like to have a reaction.

For them, there has to be a specific form of intentionality behind the communication of media for it to be meaningful.

And they're stuck within a very fixed world in terms of like their range of sensibility.

And that's why they that's why they are no longer able to impart fully, at least in its full dimension, the master signifier underlying our entire matrix of meaningfulness.

Right?

So of course, no wonder there's all these problems of.

people adopting different subcultures and and uh psi psychosis and so on.

And the breakdown of the family.

The main force of the breakdown of the family today, in addition to the economic realities, of course, is just the fact that the familial form of socialization

Um is breaking apart because of the internet, right?

But that doesn't mean it's no longer I mean, the the fact look, there is a flesh and bone aspect that's not replaceable by the Internet, but the Internet's this interface on top that's determining the structure of how people are becoming socialized at the household level.

And it doesn't mean that their fathers and mothers are no longer meaningful to them at all.

It just means that, like,

Um

There's a severe disruption as far as the ability to communicate meaning, right?

The maintenance of meaning.

Okay, ones if this was like a useful kind of.

Oh, I'm not even done yet.

Fuck, I'm not even done yet.

All right.

My bad.

So, if you're looking for a book to just kind of glue everything together.

Um you're gonna not interpret it the correct way, uh and I know that.

You didn't interpret uh my substack articles.

Nobody even cares about them.

Uh it's very rare that I see anyone truly understand what I was trying to get at.

And I it's not your fault, absolutely not.

And you know what would make it really easy for me to pump out books?

So if someone took the helm of the infrared ship.

And like continued to communicate and impart this world, right?

This world, this logos, the infrared logos.

I would be freed up to just write the fucking book.

If I, if someone else was doing what I was fucking doing, I would have written 10, 20 books by now.

And my books would metanumically, implicitly reference this fucking streamer movement.

It'd be like, so y'all are plugged in with infrared, right?

So I'm going to write this shit.

You'll fucking understand it.

But because I'm the fucking guy who's doing this shit, for me to do this and simultaneously write a fucking book is really fucking hard because I can't take for granted that somebody's communicating this cosmos the right way.

That somebody is imparting upon you a specific semblance of a new signifier or logos.

Like I have to be at the helm of the ship steering it.

And every time I write, I have to get off of the helm and retreat into the captain's quarters.

But lo and behold, the fucking it's a rocky and steady journey.

I have to fucking run back up, right?

So, you need to understand, I mean, beyond, I mean, on top of the fact that I have to do, I'm chairman of the party, but the main and fundamental reason why I've kind of become a little blackpilled about the written medium is this.

But I'm still going to do it.

It's going to be a Herculean task to do this shit.

I'm still going to fucking do it, okay?

But um

Uh I I guess I would say like I I don't want you guys to

Ignore that there's that this book is

Probably more important than the actual book I'm gonna fucking write, to be honest.

The book that I'm gonna write can can has the potential to be misinterpreted in millions of different ways.

This is the only context that establishes the closest level of clarity to meaning that we have.

Um, which I know infrared's been lacking on the multimedia front.

But look what we have now, the party.

That's the final bit that I wanted to get to.

None of this works, the logos.

The logos cannot come to fruition.

And truly

Become a new signifier without activity, without some fucking, without a way in the real world of changing reality in some way.

And this is what the party's doing.

And it's like, that's how we're going to get to the point where eventually you're not going to need me.

And I will not have been successful.

All of this hinges upon.

The success of all of this hinges upon

That we get to a point.

Where the logos of this whole fucking movement acquires systemic redundancy, and the torch of Haas can be passed not just to you, to dozens of fucking people who fucking get it.

You understand?

Like, this is not a personal vanity project for me.

I don't attribute the meaning and the sign behind all of this to some extraordinary and exceptional special quality of my person.

I

am very desperately trying to communicate a something.

And if I if we don't ever get to the point where that something isn't seized by you without me and you're able to actually understand what it fucking is without me,

I will have failed my whole fucking life's goal.

Right?

All of this fucking depends.

Upon this outliving me.

Because, in all likelihood, let's be honest.

The story of Haas is not a story of some guy.

It's like, you know how fucking stupid that would be.

Imagine I made a TikTok of my life story.

Like when all is said and done, it's like, he started out, you know, he was in high school reading marks, and then he went to law school, he got insomnia, he became a streamer, and it was just an upward path from there.

And then he became the president.

Like, that's not how this shit's going to go.

Okay.

It's going to get to a point where I'm going to either be fucking killed or I'm going to be in jail or who fucking knows.

And if by that point, had I not fucking put this fucking message in a bottle and sent it away from me, I will have fucking failed, right?

Listen, look, if I make it, if I make it, I will have been incredibly fucking lucky.

But let's break it down, ladies and gentlemen.

I'm saying this rationally.

I'm saying this rationally.

Let's break it down.

The first generation of this movement, me specifically, the first gen of this movement, first gen leaders of this movement, the probability of survival is very fucking low.

They're going to take us out.

When we get to the point of actually really getting on the radar of things, they're just going to take us out.

First gen is not going to fucking make it.

Are you fucking crazy?

First gen leadership, you think first gen leadership is going to make it past the finish line?

Inshallah, I fucking hope.

Am I hinging all my bets on that?

No, I'm hinging on.

That we can pass the baton to the fucking people who can make it, you know, in the future, right?

This might take a fucking generation, by the way, right?

But uh, it's like the f people on the front line, the the first ones, we're testing the fucking waters.

That's what we're doing right now.

We're testing how far we can fucking go before they start.

Yeah.

How far can we fucking go?

Right?

We're not meant to be the ones that make it past the finish line.

That's my pessimistic view.

Maybe I'm wrong.

None of this story for me involves a delusion that

Uh I will one day be like Xi Jinping and preside over some peaceful, prosperous country or some shit.

I'll tell you that much.

Best I could hope for, best I could fucking hope for, like the absolute best I can fucking hope for.

Is that I make it past the finish line as a deeply traumatized, wounded veteran.

of a war, and retire with honorifics

And as an old man, and just watch this thing.

you know, win and be in power or some shit, right?

Lennon and Mao survived.

No, they di fucking didn't, okay?

Lennon?

Did not survive.

That's the thing.

He just didn't.

He, a few years after the revolution, he's gone.

Okay.

And then Mao.

You're right, he survived in some sense.

He didn't see China proper today, China.

He didn't live to see that.

So, in some sense, he didn't.

But.

Maybe I'm wrong, by the way.

You know, by the way, I'm not saying this is dead, set in stone.

Orvo, what's up?

I'm not saying this is set in stone.

I'm not claiming it's set in stone.

I could very well be wrong.

I could very well make it past the finish line.

I could very well make it to that point.

I'm just saying if we were wise, we would take the precaution.

And acknowledge there's a possibility that the first gen leadership, there's a high probability that we will be neutralized.

If you're going up against Skynet, just don't take it personally.

Think of it.

You're going up.

This is a...

Like you're going up against Skynet.

They're going to fucking take you out, bro.

They're going to take out the first line of defense.

It's meant to happen that way.

You have to plan in anticipation of that.

God, and hope we're going to be wrong.

But you still have to fucking prepare for it is what I'm trying to say.

Can you guys, okay, can you beyond?

I know some people, some of you are worried and stuff.

Just at least ones if you can just pick up what I'm putting down right now with this, okay?

Can you at least appreciate that this movement is bigger than any one individual?

Please, ones, if you can just fucking acknowledge that.

Like, this is not a vanity project for me or anyone.

Like, this is a message that I want to outlive all of us.

It's so much more important and meaningful than one person.

Can we at least say like that?

Like, I know we joke about being a cult and shit, but like, how many of y'all are on the same fucking page that there's something fucking bigger here?

Very, very fucking important, right?

This is a very unique articulation of revolutionary consciousness and world history, right?

That deserves to be developed more.

And it's a line of inquiry that deserves to be furthered.

It's a movement, right?

And uh Vaquera, what's up, bro?

The reason I'm giving this lecture to you isn't because I'm throwing myself a fucking pity pity party.

Um

It's because I want you to understand that this is more serious.

That this message is more serious.

And, uh,.

You know.

It's a logos.

And it's not going to be able to be complete in one book.

Even if I complete 10 books, it's still not going to be enough.

To comprehend logos.

We need a new medium of communication that has sys system redundancy, that um is more all-encompassing and comprehensive.

Humble, what's up?

Only Adam the only the thing is is that uh anyone can alright and uh

When we get to that point

Um

All of all of this comes from the cultivation and development of signs.

That's it.

Okay, for example, when you see the sign of Hezbollah, that's a fucking signifier.

When you see their logo, it's a signifier.

It fucking means something, right?

I'm not saying we're gonna be like them, they're a designated terrorist organization.

I'm not saying that, but we we need to get to a point where this shit means something, right?

Infrared fucking means something.

It communicates an entire fucking world.

It's it's like an in it it has that meaningfulness.

And that's the only thing more revolutionary than a revolution itself.

What's more revolutionary than a revolution itself is the thing around which the process revolves.

That, my friends, is Logos.

Like, Hezbollah is revolutionary by being there.

That's it.

They're there.

The fucking world changes in a revolutionary way around them.

They have something, they've attained some logos in their case.

Khomeini's Shia kind of Hussein, right?

But they don't have to LARP revolution.

They don't even have to talk about revolution.

They have discovered the very thing around which processes revolve.

Do you understand?

Like to attain the sun is to attain

The center around which the celestial bodies revolve.

You understand?

Once if you fucking get that.

The fucking sign.

That's the word.

That's the logos.

That's the sign.

That's what it fucking is.

The thing around which everything fucking revolves.

And if you attain it,

You attain it.

You will be effortlessly revolutionary.

Effortlessly revolutionary.

Okay, y'all.

I'm fucking tired, I'm beat, I'm sure you are too.

We're fucking wrapping it up there.

Alright?

I thought we would do some TikTok today, this lecture took a little longer than I thought it would.

Debate, okay.

One guy wants to debate.

Fine, where are you in VC?

Who's this fucking guy that wants to debate?

Literally, what do you want what do you fucking want?

Okay, while we're waiting for him, see me, where?

By the I wanted to show you one last thing before we're done.

I couldn't.

It's more Reddit, I'm sorry, but I just couldn't believe it.

Uh

This is real.

This is a real thing.

Let me find it.

See let me zoom in more.

Uh I'm about to be thirty years old and I'm just kind of

Mm baffled.

The ACP is the Nazi party, anyone who says otherwise is either lying or misinformed.

So let me say this, ACP, we will not tolerate you, we will not let you divide the working class, we will not let you separate the workers of the world.

Communism is international and intersectional, always will be.

The only reason you exist is because the current regime is falling and you are their last chance to retain fascist power.

You are not socialist, you'll never be socialist.

Nothing other than means to create separation between the working class.

But all of us, the workers of the world, shall unite always with dignity and always with respect.

Anything else is inhumane will not tolerate Nazis infiltrating our spaces we represent on workers.

Uh

Imagine Haas reading this and like reacting to it.

Like, that's kind of the point we're at.

Like, I'm about to be 30, man.

Like, imagine showing this to a 30-year-old man like me who's just

Like imagine like showing this to me.

Like what do you want me to say?

But this is their way of creating this is their logos, honestly.

They're creating this kind of narrative structure in their head.

There's a song playing in the guy's head when he's typing this.

There's a specific scene that's being conjured in his imagination, like a movie.

And he's like, he's like, he feels this is very brave, this is very bold, this is very.

Beautiful, we're all in this together.

Like, he's just like, there's this vibe that he's he's here.

You know, the f the I see these things.

That's why I cringe so hard.

Because I see the type, the little fucking worlds people live in.

I fucking see it.

Always.

Um I think this is someone who lives in Europe.

who lives in Belgium or something, and is very upset

I don't know, like they're saying we're not internationalist.

Okay, well clearly not talking about our stance on Iran.

They must talk about let's b break down all the barriers.

Okay.

So you're in an irrelevant shitty European country.

Of course you want to break down the barriers.

you want to enjoy the same relevancy that an American Communist has.

But you live in a shitty, retarded, small country that no one fucking cares about, Belgium.

And so internationalism for you is an opportunity to just grift off of

Countries that actually fucking have more than twenty people in them.

All right?

Don't know what they could possibly mean.

Uh nationality means nothing uh than to sep okay.

All of us workers shall unite.

I think they're just kind of giving a speech in their head and they find it beautiful and it's kind of like an autistic larp.

You only exist 'cause the current regime is falling and you are their last chance to retain fascist power.

This is a psychotic episode.

You you think

First of all, you think ACP is the regime's last chance to s okay, so they've exhausted every chance to stay in power, and the last one is the American Communist Party.

I mean what should I say?

What am I supposed to say?

It's actually like

Top comment is them calling us feds.

Okay.

But do you know why they call us feds?

Because feds are associated with the supreme logos around which

society is for.

So the people say all of society is for, you know, the specific system we have is maintained by the Feds in their view, right?

When they call us Feds, they're acknowledging that we have the same level of like versatility and dynamism and power really.

With respect to the determination of reality that they think feds do, they see us as this all-pervasive source of power and authority.

And we're operating beyond the visible spectrum.

Like the you know how the CIA is regarded as like the CIA is operating behind the scenes, manipulating and manufacturing reality because they're beyond.

any specific appearance or phenomenal form.

Well, they see us as the same way.

They see us as this like shadowy thing beyond the visible spectrum that is like operating at a register above mirror

Uh lower level forms of consciousness, mere images, mere uh you know um discourses, mere individual psychologies.

We're operating at a level above and you know what we are, bitch We're not the CIA, we're not the FBI, we're the fucking I G G, bitch

We are above the fucking CIA!

We are above the fucking FBI!

We are above the fucking intelligence agencies!

We are above everything, bitch!

We're the fucking party of God, bitch.

We are fucking in.

We are directly in communion with heaven, bitch.

We are above!

We are the fucking angelic!

We talk to angels, bitch!

We're getting ordered by the angels.

We are the party of God.

We get the orders directly from the angels, directly from heaven, to communicate heaven's will.

Yes, we operate at a register far above, far above your piss and naive fucking individual consciousness.

You know, you just walk every day woo woo woo, I'm just a naive little retard and I just We don't fucking walk through this world blind, bitch, we see all the fuck we see shit even CIA fucks can't see.

We see them.

We are the all-seeing eye, bitch.

I am the fucking thirty three hundredth degree Freemason, bitch.

We are the fucking conspiracy, we control the discourse, we are on top, bitch.

Pussy

This type of shit is above everything, bitch.

This type of shit.

Has ascended beyond anything any intelligence agency can fucking be worth and do.

Because nothing is more powerful than a fucking symbol.

Think about this: what separates a cult?

From something that actually fucking matters, right?

A symbol.

Fucking, anyone can, anyone can wear a Chegovara t-shirt.

You don't have to be part of any organization, it means something.

System redundancy, the Christian cross, system redundancy.

You don't have to be part of a specific anything for that to fucking mean something, right?

That's what we're fucking building.

That's what this shit is.

That's above everything.

Dawes, are you what is it gonna take for you Dawes?

There's footage of me firing rocket-propelled grenades.

There's footage of me firing machine guns.

There's footage of me in fucking war zones.

What is it gonna fucking take for you to understand?

Oh, because you're sitting in front of a camera talking, the most instantaneous medium of communication in the 21st century possible.

That somehow means this is all fake.

Like, even if you're going off such a superficial appraisal of the meaningfulness of the media that you're being, that you're consuming that I'm in.

Bitch, don't say I'm a fucking sitting in my room yelling.

There's footage of me.

You just go on my Instagram, look at the shit that I've been up to.

There's footage of me doing crazy ass shit.

What the fuck are you talking about?

He's the duck guy.

You're not saying anything meaningful right now.

Who the fuck is the duck guy?

TikTok debates.

Oh, it's Russia Defender.

No, it's not.

Is it Russia Defender?

No it's fucking not.

He said, I talked to him on the phone.

What the fuck are you talking about?

My bro is in your club.

Can we unban him?

Holy fuck, I'm literally so hungry.

Holy shit.

Just fucking unban him.

What the fuck, why is everybody messaging me the same shit?

Hey, fucking uh unban this guy, holy shit, I'm literally starving.

I'm fucking so hungry.

I'm about to fucking die.

To see it on stream.

Yeah, if only it was so simple.

I'm trying to fucking lose weight and shit too.

Holy fuck.

Jesus Christ.

Do we have any um do we have any fucking mods that are active right now who can unban this guy?

Is there any?

Uh

What are we looking at guys, what's going on?

TikTok.

Is he unbanned?

Is he unbanned?

Is he unbanned?

I don't think he's banned.

Is if somebody asks Sungross, Sungross is online, can somebody tag Sungross?

I'm literally so hungry, holy fuck.

Boss Dawes

Holy fuck, I have to do it myself, holy shit.

I have I don't even know how to fucking do that.

Uh

Uh okay, I have to find band.

Nope, no bands.

Nope, there's nobody of that name who's banned.

Nobody's banned who's named Boss.

Try it again, D Doss Boss.

Nobody's fucking banned by that name.

Links are all expired.

Somebody give him a fucking invite.

Why the fuck is Jackson active right now?

Fucking Discord.

Alright, guys, a fucking time waster.

Tell Jackson to get him VC right now.

Tell Jackson to get in uh show cue right now.

Yo!

Yo!

Yo!

Yo.

Where the f ⁇ k are you?

Is there anyone in here?

You're on a live stream?

Yes.

Really?

Yes, on kick.

Really?

Yes.

Listen, this place is so cool.

Where?

I'm going to show you on stream.

That's okay, yeah.

We're in the Guizhou province of China.

But right now

Here, sorry for a second.

Here, I'll I'll show you.

Hold on, I I'm gonna fucking show these people the Discord I thought you were live on kick.

I am forty five.

Can they see me?

Yes, I just showed the window.

Um

Alright, they can see me?

Yeah.

All right.

Uh how do I re how do I flip my oh here.

Can you see?

Uh yeah, I'm so fucking jealous.

What the fuck?

So basically we just walked um we walked like all the way down across that uh ridge side and

We're here because, well, we're here for the 90th anniversary of the long march, 91st anniversary of the Zun Yi conference, where Mao took control effectively.

He didn't become like secret, but he was put into leadership.

But so we're doing a bunch of like long march-themed things here.

Yesterday, Chris and I met with some party cadre, guys born before the establishment of the PRC.

And he was a veteran of the PLA.

We met with several of these cadre committee people for the Guizhou and Zunyi local parties.

And, you know, we met them as it was an honor for us to meet them, but they were so honored that we were there as members and leadership of the American Communist Party.

And they were really blown away by everything that we've been doing.

And we talked a little bit about that.

And they told us a lot of stories.

But right now, we're here in the Guizhou province in the rural region.

We drove a few hours out here.

And basically, all along, there's like rural communities out here, rural villages.

And today, everyone knows like the bridges that China builds, the tunnels.

We're about to see later today.

We're going to be at the world's largest bridge that went super viral earlier this year upon its completion.

But we're kind of seeing the things that inspired that.

So I'll just say as a last point before we get in the car, what we're looking at right now is all along these mountainsides, there's a bunch of rural villages.

And before the revolution, they had nothing.

They had no water.

It was like they had prolonged droughts and whatnot.

They couldn't even produce rice here.

They had no livestock.

They had nothing.

And a local party chairman got elected to serve this county and all the villages.

And he got elected on the promise of bringing water and electricity and roads to the community.

And he and his party cadre had like no knowledge of how to do any of this stuff.

And they went and basically along the cliffsides, along three cliffsides, three mountain ranges, and all this dense forest terrain, they built a nine-kilometer, four and a half-mile-long water canal to supply water to thousands of people here.

And now they produce rice, livestock, everything.

China has interconnected them with all these massive bridges.

And the guy who led this effort

Uh

Da Hua Fa.

He is 91 years old.

He's been awarded the July 1st Medal, which is the equivalent of the Presidential Medal of Freedom Award.

And we're actually going to go meet him in a little bit.

And he's the one, the secretary of the party, that led this effort when he was elected in 1958.

He was in his 20s.

It took them 39 years to build this.

They built it with pickaxes.

They had no machinery.

They're along cliffside hanging by ropes.

It's incredible.

How spiritual is this?

Is this this is a pilgrimage, by the way?

I could tell.

I could tell you're in good spirits 'cause this is a spiritual journey.

I'm not even kidding.

China has always been extremely spiritual for me when I was there.

And I can't imagine being here, being there right now.

Holy fuck.

I'll show you, Chris.

Where are the folks?

I'm live, Chris.

Don't say bad words.

He's live.

Hi.

We're live, Chris.

No bad words.

No bad words.

Here we are.

We're here.

We're struggling.

This is a pilgrimage.

It's a red pilgrimage.

It's a red pilgrimage.

We're coming to see all of the heroic deeds of the ordinary Chinese people.

Not only of the leadership which sacrificed so much, but ordinary people who we don't know their names, we don't commemorate them with pictures and banners.

They're here.

They do all of the work.

They do all the work.

The roads, the infrastructure.

You can't imagine the things we're seeing here.

They built it a whole canal for 40 years for like a village of 100 people.

I mean, it's unbelievable.

During the Great Leap Forward, by the way.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

And afterwards, even into the 90s, the people are just with hand tools just doing work.

It's amazing.

Phenomenal.

Phenomenal.

I'm more and more impressed every time I come to China and I lived here, as you know, for two years.

I'm impressed by the spirit, the tenacity, the resilience, the discipline, and the love of country and of people that ordinary Chinese people have for one another.

It's absolutely beyond words.

It's beyond words.

That's it.

Count this, huh?

Sure, thank you.

And Chris is making the journey on uh on crutches.

I think we're good to go if you guys are.

He's still injured.

Oh, okay.

Okay.

He's on crutches, yeah.

Oh, my God.

And the crazy thing about this all is that, well, yesterday when we met the party cadre, one of the guys was born in 1948 in Zun Yi, which is like the epicenter of the Long March because it changed the whole trajectory from Soviet-influenced conventional warfare with Bogu and Otto Braun to the guerrilla warfare approach led by Mao.

They were telling us stories about how before, Chris asked them, like, what was it like before the revolution?

And all these people were there born before the revolution and they said, you know, it's like, you know, talking about the landlords, the brutal landlords and whatnot.

You don't have to explain to anyone what a furry is, did you?

Okay.

'Cause I they were very, very, very the happiest I saw them was when we said well, we didn't say it, but they told us to say it, our friends here, they're like, you know, tell them we represent and they were you know, they were shocked, they were in love with the fact that we came from American Communist Party.

But but um have you told them about the problems we face with other leftists?

Or no?

It's just negativity.

Look, they they don't even understand like this

Like transgenders and stuff and well, they don't but we're fixing the war here and we're we're being told that over there that's all they c that that we're fascists because we don't care either and then I don't know, you know?

We don't care either, but that we're s we're constantly being told we're not the real communists.

So I was wondering if you're talking to the real communists, what do they think of this f um Redditors and stuff?

Bro, they don't know what any of that is.

They don't I'm just telling you, they don't know what any of that is.

It's like uh What do you mean?

They don't know about the trans trans uh stuff?

Bro I thought I thought everyone knew about it.

'Cause I thought all communists knew about it and it's all about what communism is, you know?

I thought it was like a really important aspect of this whole thing.

Well, you know, when we go meet uh the ninety-one year old party local party chairman Huang Da Fa, who built this canal over 40 years, I'll be sure to ask him about the furries, okay?

Who cares about canals?

What about the pride parades?

Yeah, right?

We need we don't know because ACP does uh some stuff, but none of that matters, so all that matters is right, or what's going on?

Oh, I got a booger.

Who?

Oh, I thought I did.

Can you not be nasty?

What's going on?

He doesn't care.

Who's he going to impress?

He's already got

I've already gotten Ellie's the best girlfriend ever.

Thank you, fellas.

Hi, Nellie.

What's up?

Are you coming to Russian?

Uh yes, but I think one day one day we're gonna see him again.

I can't reveal the dates uh on public 'cause we're live.

Listen, um, this place is great.

This trip is amazing, and um

I'm you're you're good.

You're good.

Our friends that all I'll say is we're about to go somewhere else, so I'm going to leave you.

But not because I have to.

The internet here is amazing.

They've got 5G plus plus.

I got to wrap it up.

Listen, all I got to say is that this trip, I'm going to be talking more about it, but uh, we're loved here, we have good friends here, vlogging and shit, right?

Yes, and people are gonna understand if they want to come on the same pilgrimage.

Uh, I'll explain, but you know, there's opportunities for our party cadre to come as well, so you're gonna be able to check that out.

But, anyways, uh, I'll talk to you guys all more later.

All right, see you later, bro.

Good shit.

Peace.

Have a good time.

All right, guys, we are way over

The stream time.

Alright.

Alright Alright y'all, I'm fucking starving.

I'm literally gonna die.

Alright, y'all, what a great stream, honestly, right?

What an unexpectedly pleasant stream.

Ones if you liked the lecture a lot.

Ones if you loved the lectures.

And of course, the other stuff was great as well.

Okay, good.

Everyone loved it.

Wonderful.

Alright, y'all.

I'll see you Thursday when I have more energy.

Bye-bye.

See ya.