IRAN WON | NO KINGS CRINGE | DEBATES

They were not

They were soldiers

They were soldiers

Soldatres

Soldatry

They were soldiers

Soldatry Saludas

I

I'm

I'm

I'm going to I'm going to

I'm

They were

soldiers

And not

They're

They're

They were They were Soldathe

D'

Give me Svlo

Oh

They were

Soldaday

I'm I't I'm

I more

I don't I'm not

they were

soldiers

They were

soldiers

They were soldiers!

They were soldiers!

They were soldiers!

They were soldiers, soldiers They were soldiers

They were soldiers

They were soldiers

They were soldiers

They were soldiers

Soldiers

Soldiers

Soldiers

Soldiers Soldiers

They're

They're

They were

They were

soldiers

They were soldiers

They were

soldiers

They were They were soldiers They were soldiers They were

soldiers

I've got They were They were soldiers

And they were

They didn't

They didn't

They were

They were

They'd

My

My be

I be D'n't D'n't My They were

soldiers

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm not

I'm

They were

soldiers

They were

soldiers They were soldiers They were soldiers

Soldatty soldiers They were

Soldiers

They were soldiers

They were soldiers

They were! They were soldiers!

Soldatts!

Soldatty!

Soldatists!

Soldat

They were, soldiers!

They were soldiers!

They were soldiers! soldiers, soldiers, they were, soldiers, they were, soldiers, they were, soldiers, they were, they were, soldiers, Salvation They were soldiers They were soldiers

Soldi Soldi

They were

Soldi

They were soldiers Soldi I

I

I

I'm

I'm

They were

soldiers

And they were soldiers

And they're

They're not

They're

They were soldiers D'

D'n't

Oh,

Oh,

they were

soldiers

I've been

I'm not

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm and I want to be a lot more a man. I'm not. I'm not. I'm not.

I'm

No. and the other I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going to be a

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm

a good and

I'm going

I'm

I'm going I'm gonna be a son-you-a-hawned

I'm gonna'n't-a-kid-knerd.

I'm gonna' a lot I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm gonna

I'm and so on the other that's a

I don't know and the other people and the other

and the other

I'm going to

I'm

I'm

I'm

and

I'm going to

I'm

a

and

I'm I don't know I'm

I'm

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm going to I'm going

and

I'm and Once if you can hear me right now. Wands if you can hear me right now.

Alright, one more question.

Does this sound better or does this sound better?

The second one or the first one?

Ones if the first or the second and The second one or the first one?

Ones if the first or the second and the second one is better.

The house divided cannot stand.

All right, y'all, all the twos.

Oh my God, Midwest Sing with the 25.

What's up, bro?

Before the stream even starts, what's up, bro?

Thank you so much.

Appreciate it, my brother.

Thank you.

The kid's CCCC. What's up?

The whole gang here.

What up?

What up?

What up?

What up?

The whole gang here.

Whole gang here. Type up? What up? What up? What up? What whole gang here? Type of shit.

What up y'all? What up y'all? Whole gang here type of shit. Whole gang here type of shit. What up y'all? What up, y'all? How y'all

doing? We got a lot

on our plate today.

Yo, what's up, everybody?

We got it. We're going to return to form.

Infrared streams are back because this new formula that I unlocked, unlimited content, by the way.

But don't worry about that because I actually have a lot to talk about in the beginning part of this whole thing.

So this is tea not caffeine so uh sofia sophia sophia Sophia Sophia Sophia Sophia

Sophia

What up with the five What up with the five

Okay guys

we got a lot to talk about

All right first of all

This slipped my mind.

You know, it almost slipped my mind.

I almost kind of forgot because I always, I'm so hard on myself.

I always make bad predictions or whatever.

But guess what?

Hey, bro.

What's up, bro?

What's going on, Harold?

How are we doing?

Whole gang here type of shit.

You know what I mean?

Whole gang here.

Harold's here.

Whole gang here type of shit.

What up, so solace.

What's up?

What's up? What's up? What's up? Uh, it's past four weeks.

Trump said that this is going to be over three, four weeks.

He said it's going to be over three, four weeks. we're past the four week mark i ran won this

bitch i ran won this bitch i ran won this bitch okay trump said that this whole thing would be over

in three to four weeks we what the hell we are past the four

week mark and iran is still standing how many of us took that black pill comrade kid after

venezuela how many of us by the way captain, Captain Dreamer, he shit. Drew Pavlou

is shit. Paperwin, what's up, bro? How many of us took that black pill after Venezuela? How many of us

genuinely were thinking it's all over for Iran, that this is going to be over? of us genuinely we're thinking

it's all over for Iran

that this is going to be over quick, that the U.S. Empire

is on a roll, that it's just going to roll

through and it's going to have a regime change,

surgical strike, the corrupt elements.

I was blackpilled as fuck.

And three, four weeks out after Trump declared that this shit was supposed to be over, it's not over.

Iran is still standing strong. Do you know how fucking powerful that is?

You understand that Iran basically won? Why? Because the first step to victory is what?

Take you time. What's up? First step

to victory. Make the enemy lose face.

That's really it.

There's a lot of reasons the Battle of Stalingrad

turn the whole war around.

I'm not an idiot. I understand because of the Volga Grad gap, there were strategic reasons, there were geographic reasons. Yes. But the Battle of Stalingrad was also the battle that everyone in the world decided was going to decide who wins.

And it became some ego shit for the Nazis.

Like if we lose Stalingrad, we may as well lose this whole fucking thing.

Right.

So a huge factor in war is that you make the enemy lose face. You contradict the word of the enemy. The word of the U.S. Empire has been contradicted. It doesn't get more humiliating

for the U.S. Empire than that.

If Trump says this shit is going to be over in four weeks,

and after four weeks passes, Iran is still standing.

Whoa, looks like these guys, confirmed, by the way,

for any remaining black pillars, confirmed, had no fucking idea what they were dealing with had no fucking idea who they were trying to fuck with confirmed by the way um and that's

just on some real ass shit

I mean

let's just take a moment

to appreciate that

the leader of the most powerful empire who appreciate that.

The leader of the most powerful empire in the world is coming out in public and he's saying,

this is going to be over three, four weeks, we know what we're doing.

Three, four weeks later, the whole thing hasn't stopped iran is still standing strong yes they're planning a ground invasion we all know that and uh i said that if iran survives past four weeks iran

wins so we're past four weeks, Iran wins.

So, we're past four weeks, Iran wins.

Because the entire premise of the operation was that this was going to be quick.

The entire premise of the original attack on Iran was that it would be quick.

And the fact that it's lasted this long so far means Iran wins. From here on out, this is the of how iran is going to defeat the u.s empire in a way so devastating it is going to be the end of the united states of america as we know it this is the

history will look on mark my words history is going to look on and say this was

the beginning this is the thing that's set in motion officially the process of the unraveling and unwinding of the United States of America.

I mean, it all goes, it's all downhill from here for the United States as a state, because there's going to be a protracted ground

invasion which Iran would love at the at the domestic level it's already been pretty

explosive without this war but the utter demoralization the utter humiliation of our regime and the eyes of us citizens

it's going to emboldened all of the wild actors that are within the regime by the way

democrat or republican or at the civilian level, who simply say, now

we tell, now is the time to cross the Rubicon and do some crazy unprecedented-ass shit by way of

civil war, by way of taking control of sections of the military, the National Guard, who knows.

And the time of risks is upon us.

I mean, we've entered a blind alley where this was a royal fuck-up.

This was a genuine royal fuck-up by the regime.

And it's only going to get worse.

And keep that in mind because in the coming weeks, in the coming months, maybe, maybe

there's a chance you're going to be hearing about things that might incline you to doom,

be a little bit of a dumer about this.

Iranians are getting killed. troops are getting devastated with some they might attack the power plants they might attack the oil facilities but think about the long game

the long game is that this is going to be the ugliest most brutal fucking guerrilla war

the world has ever seen if it gets to that point it before the regime falls you are going to witness

the most aggressive, brutal, and ruthless guerrilla warfare campaign history has ever seen.

And that will do the U.S. in. And notice, I'm not just saying the U.S. Empire.

I'm saying the United States of America is going to end.

It's over.

This is the thing that sets it in motion.

It began with us attacking the world's oldest,

one of the world's oldest civilizations and the first world

empire on earth we attacked Iran

we basically communicated to the stars

above that we are willingly

going over to our end.

It's a bad omen that you're at war with Iran. It's a bad omen. How can you go to war with eternity?

How can you go to war with the eternal reality of civilization? Iran is Babylon. Iran is Egypt. Iran is Assyria. Iran is Phoenicia. Iran is everything.

Iran is the all of history. The fire temples, the tomb of Cyrus the Great, that is the same thing that Lenin's tomb was constructed under the inspiration of, for a reason, because even the bolsheviks recognized that iran is the all

iran is everything iran is the world you attack iran you go to war with Iran.

You make yourself an aggressor. You fail to recognize Iran.

You spell your own doom.

This is the truth truth Iran has won

more or less Iran has won

speak

if only Marx was alive

what would he think by the way of what's going on

the Middle East it's like Europe

Europe was in the 19th century

right

a bunch of kings

bunch of fat pedophile kings and princes and fucking piece of

shits with their crowns and their fucking royal families in this feudal nonsense, retard fucking

golf states, the fucking fat bitch swine king of Jordan, all these disgusting filthy monarchs representing the ancient

regime these fat pieces of shit normalized in our so-called yeah but the middle east what did that

fucking bald piece of shit envoy to lebanon say said, well, the best thing the Arabs have are monarchies.

Everyone should be a monarchy.

Iran is a republic.

It's a republic.

It's a revolutionary republic.

It carries the torch of Robespbier, the Jacobins.

They got the fucking guillotine,

and the heads are going to be chopping

and rolling.

Do you understand?

Iran.

Iran is the revolution of our time.

The whole fucking ancient regime of the Middle East, all these fat, fucking disgusting,

obese U.S. puppet fucking princes and kings, their heads will fucking roll.

Ban me from the U.A., ban me from Saudi Arabia, ban me from Qatar, ban me from Kuwait, Ban me from the U.E. Ban me from Saudi Arabia.

Ban me from Qatar. Ban me from Kuwait.

Ban me from Jordan. I don't give a fuck.

I'll fucking say that. Their heads will

roll. Just like the fucking heads

of the French

king and his whore wife

rolled.

Do you understand?

Iran is the republic.

It is the inheritance of the entire revolutionary history of mankind.

Amilo, what's up?

Think about that.

It's like you have the Middle East.

You have these disgusting monarchies in the 21st.

I mean, look, I am an ironic monarchist in the sense of i'm talking about an ancient i'm talking about how there's parallels between the form of the proletarian dictatorship and a more

ancient structure of political leadership and dictatorship and empire since ancient times since the bronze age i talk

about the resonance across history am i unironically a monarch who believes that people should

actually wear a fucking crown and and and and and and just what be like an actual fucking king fuck no i'm not a retard okay

like jishin ping you can say he's an emperor but is he unironically an emperor?

No, that's ridiculous. That's fucking stupid.

In the 21st century, in 26, you have fucking kings

ruling the most strategically

important region of the fucking world,

the linchpin of the global economy, and the entire global empire under whose regime we are all subjects. And it's a bunch of fucking monarchies from the Stone Age. you have this extremely backward,

disgusting landscape in the Middle East.

And then Persia, Iran, It's a republic.

How fucking crazy is that?

It's a revolutionary republic founded upon the deposition of a royal family.

There are unironic leftcoms and Trotskyite retards who come to us and say, Iran is reactionary because there's no gay rights.

And the U.S. is relatively progressive because it's liberalism. And Iran is reaction and fascist, and the U.S. is liberalism.

This is what these Zionist leftists and Zionist fake Marxists literally unironically say.

Had they lived during the time of the Jacobins, they would have called Robespierre a reactionary because he persecuted the effeminate, decadent aristocracy with powdered wigs.

You know, they used to wear dresses and run around and have queer theory or whatever.

And Robespierre put an end to all of it.

He persecuted the entire aristocracy.

They were all into that fashionable, whatever nonsense.

The Jacobins put an end to it.

The Sands Kululow, whatever the fuck you say in French, they put an end to that nonsense.

They were just like the Iranian revolutionaries.

They were the same thing.

They were just like the besieges on the streets.

It's the same thing in principle really it is they mean to tell us they mean to tell us that Iran is backwards.

Iran is a revolutionary republic

in a region that has

never been ruled by mass

politics ever.

Even I love the experience

I don't, what am I mean to love

I appreciate the experience

of Arab nationalism I do

Nasr

cool guy Gaddafi

Afiz al-Assad

but they were not

this was not mass politics

this was an elite military that took control that was

trying to in many ways bring the masses up iran is an actual republic by for and of the people so how

crazy it is how insane is it that this is the story of the world today you have iran fighting the

world's biggest empire ever most most powerful empire ever and then you have these these disgusting Gulf monarchies who represent the ancient regime in the region.

Glory to Iran.

Glory to Iran.

Honestly, glory to Iran.

By the way, Amila, thank you so much.

Holy shit.

Thank you so, so much.

Iran is...

The Middle East has been this ancient regime for so long.

Everyone is black, but all they get...

Iran, this is going to accelerate a regional revolution.

I'll go ahead and fucking say it.

Ban me from Jordan.

I don't give a fuck.

I don't care about going on smelly Air Jordan for the rest of my life.

I don't care.

Ban me from Jordan. Ban me from all these fucking monarchical, disgusting... smelly Air Jordan for the rest of my life. I don't care.

Ban me from Jordan.

Ban me from all these fucking monarchical, disgusting shithole states.

I'm an American. I don't have to respect none of that.

Fuck the UAE. Fuck Saudi Arabia.

Fuck Qatar. Fuck Kuwait.

Fuck Jordan. And it's king.

Disgusting,

filthy Kufar.

Fuck the king of Morocco, too. Oh, no, no, no, mind. I'm sorry, I want to go of Morocco too.

Oh, no, no, no, no, I'm sorry.

I want to go to Morocco.

Marengu with the five, what's up?

I just destroyed my chances of going to Morocco.

That was a joke.

I'm a comedian.

I'm an American comedian.

I could just say whatever I want, right?

Damn it. So, death, death to these disgusting gulf monarchies and glory to iran for ushering true progress into the region true progress into the region by the way you have to really think about it what is progress

and what is reaction well progress what is okay democracy is progressive

according to marxism what's democracy iran is a democracy iran is actual mass it's governed by

actual mass politics the masses the masses have power in Iran.

Do they have power in Saudi Arabia? Do they have power in Qatar? Do they have power in Kuwait?

And the UA? No, they fucking don't. They're nothing. They're either, they're usually they're

bribed like the ancient gay reeks were with privilege and wealth and then majority of the population are foreign slaves in fact there's so many parallels between the Gulf Arab states and

the ancient gai rakes

and they're not going to prevail

over Iran this time. The UAE

is in the crosshairs of Iran.

The UAE will never

be allowed to fucking get its

revenge that it's so dearly.

The only way this comes to a conclusion, regional revolution.

True regime change.

How about we show you some true regime change?

How about some real regime change for a change?

I forgot Bahrain.

Bahrain, Bahrain.

Bahrain.

So this is the reality we're faced with.

John, what's up?

Appreciate you, bro. Thank you.

So... so I think that I'm calling it for Iran.

That's what I'll say.

I'm calling it for Iran.

We're past the four-week mark.

That the operation was supposed to last this long, four weeks.

We're past that mark.

Now, what are we saying? We're seeing that mark. Now, what are we saying?

We're seeing that Trump...

He's making some really funny claims. It's like you can call it for Iran. What?

What is he saying?

Oh, man.

You have to look at this.

You have to appreciate what victory looks like.

Nothing to do with that.

What happens to the straight, we're not going to have anything to do with because these countries, China, China will go up and they'll fuel up their beautiful ships and they'll leave and they'll take care of themselves. There's no reason for us to do it. We hit them hard. We got rid of a lot of the radicalized lunatics along the straight but if they want something but i would say that within uh two weeks maybe two weeks maybe three we're hitting

a very he got any more weeks he got any more weeks two two three weeks i promise that's it two three two three two any more weeks? You got any more weeks? Two, three weeks.

I promise.

That's it.

Two three more weeks.

You got any more weeks?

I promise.

I only need two more.

Two, three more weeks.

I promise.

Buddy, what is this even mean anymore?

Two, three more weeks?

What happened to four weeks?

Very hard.

Last night, we knocked out tremendous amounts of missile making facilities, as you probably

read or wrote.

We knocked out, excuse me?

Pardon me, pardon you're interrupting.

We'll be, the U.S. would be gone or done with the war?

I think we're two or three weeks.

We'll leave.

There's no reason for us to do this.

Look, problem with the straight, a guy can take a mine,

drop it in the water, and say, oh, it's unsafe. It's not like you're taking out an army or you're taking out a country or you do it.

They can drop it.

Or you can take a machine gun from the shore and shoot a little few bullets on a ship,

or maybe an over-the-shoulder, missile, small missiles.

That's not for us.

That'll be fine.

But Trump also likes to do the juke out, and I think a ground invasion is quite possible.

He might just be saying this for the press, for the markets, really. He might be saying it for the markets and he has in fact no intention of leaving in two, three weeks. However, the fact that

he's contradicting himself is a massive loss of face

if you ask me

he massively loses face

from this

I think that's an objective

fact

a friend that'll be for whoever objective fact but of France

that'll be for

whoever's using

the strait

but I think

when we leave

probably that's all

cleared up

today I heard

tremendous numbers

of ships

were sailing

through

I just gave you guys

a meme you know, that, that, uh, that screenshot of me checking my phone.

That's going to be, uh, it's a great reaction.

That's a great reaction.

That's going to be a great reaction okay so he just heard him right two three more weeks uh well it unfortunately it just doesn't work that way you know okay so two things can happen tomorrow

nine p.m. eastern time perhaps it is possible that donald trump will be announcing the

ground invasion begins tomorrow and nine p.m. We'll have to see. But so far, I think we can say in

some good confidence that Trump has lost the war, the U.S. has lost Iran, has won. No thanks to the domestic leftists. as one.

No thanks to the domestic leftists in the United States, by the way.

No thanks to any kind of domestic

opposition forces.

Besides, of course, the disgruntled

MAGA base who's pressuring Trump

via Tucker Carlson and others.

Trump, by the way, doesn't care what the Democrats think. They would love nothing more than to

polarize the country along red-blue lines as far as support for the war is concerned. But it's the

fact that MAGA is against the intervention that is giving

the administration a hard time when it comes to the domestic lack of approval for this war.

Let's never forget that, by the way.

You see, he doesn't care what liberals think.

He doesn't care what, nobody. He doesn't care what...

Nobody cares what they think.

They're not in power.

The only thing that successfully sabotaged these imperialist plans is the fact that Trump's electorate that got him elected is not on board with it.

And this is

common sense, really. So these are the simple facts. These are the simple facts.

And I have to show you guys some things.

Speaking of domestic opposition

to the administration,

there are different forms that takes.

There's the opposition that come from the masses,

and then there's this.

So I want a few things.

I've seen a lot of posts of people claiming that no kings,

we can't just stay in our bubbles.

No kings is how we reach the masses

and convert them to communism.

People at no kings, they're more disposed to virtue signal.

Yes, they're more disposed to virtue signal about left-wing issues.

I agree.

Are they more disposed materially to be opposed to imperialism?

No, they're the beneficiaries of imperialism.

In any case, this is the masses, according to these people. I mean, it's good. I mean, it's just the epitome of a

The Blue Sky

I can send this is the, there's a tone.

It's the Blue Sky Libtard

Millennial.

This is very much

millennial. By the way, if all millennials died, I think

about this a lot.

Maybe I'm a millennial. Maybe I'm not going to make the cut.

But if all millennials

disappeared,

immediate revolution, immediate victory of socialism,

immediately victory of communism, by the way.

They are the most vicious, disgusting, subhuman generation the world has ever seen,

at least in the American context.

Millennial, the average millennial, they are so disgusting and filthy.

I hate them.

They love The Simpsons.

They are all low testosterone males, and the women are fucking retarded and birdbrained.

And this is their humor. I mean, this is what they, this is so quirky.

And I don't know how to, I don't know what to, they, it's like wholesome, wholesome, uh, rebelliousness, wholesome punk rock.

And I remember it distinctly from Twitter and, I remember, remember Twitter in 2021.

Remember what that was like?

All these fucking millennials running around.

Yeah, this is that

Facebook humor from Facebook millennials

and they just... This is them. This is their whole world.

Oh,

Oh,

I'm not talking about you. I'm not talking about you. All right? I'm not talking about our people. I'm talking about on 2021 on Twitter when I call everybody ugly. Do I, you know what? It'd be really mean if I did this because I don't know how much how much people evolved

but what if we just did a throwback and I go back to that original post and I show you all the

people that quote tweeted me to contradict when I said that all my haters are ugly, right?

You would not, I went, the other day I went back and looked at the people who quote

tweeted me to contradict me.

You would not believe.

They're all in blue sky now.

You would not believe...

Should I...

Okay, you know what?

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

Fuck it.

I'm...

Fuck it.

Because I was...

The other day, I was just curious.

Like, like... fuck it because i was the other day i was just curious like like

oh man I look back and I'm like, why the fuck?

Why the fuck did I, like, why did nobody call this shit out for how crazy it is?

Hold up. I gotta find it.

The people that tried to contradict me.

By the way, the profile picture, I was the most baller person on Twitter at that time.

This was my profile picture while I was talking all that shit.

I was telling you, you'll never find anything like that ever again.

I had to adapt to the autism of the internet.

Those who knew, knew.

Those who knew, new? Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Hold on, I gotta find it.

Oh my God. uh... uh...

uh...

i gotta find it hold on Oh it was so

There was so much

There was one that shocked me

One of them like

Totally fucking shocked me

When I saw it

I was like

All right

Hold on It was so bad I was like, all right.

Hold on.

It was so back, back then there was no,

back then the internet,

Twitter was such a bubble that people fucking did this without getting bullied.

I have to show you.

Hold on.

I'm looking for one. Like one like one okay there's one that just fucking

extremely like extreme confusion on my part like i just got fucking confused, okay?

I got super confused.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

All right.

Hold on.

I think it's here.

Oh, no.

Okay, the ones that are females, I'm not going to pick on them because that's satanic, right?

Okay, there's a few.

Oh my God, bro.

Bro. Bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro.

Okay, I'm not going to pick on females, but this is fucking crazy.

This one is crazy.

All right, no, this is the one that I saw that just confused the fuck out of me.

I looked, the other day I was like, I was so bad back then. Was I so bad? And then I'm like, okay, if I had attractive haters, my whole worldview would collapse. Look who quotes eats me. I was just confused. I saw the other day, I was just confused.

I saw the other day, I was like,

what did they mean by this?

I was like,

I was like, what did they mean by this?

There's so many examples like that.

I was like, why did I let them get away

with that? I'm so nice.

And then, uh, look at this one.

Hey, loser. What is this

mean? What am I supposed?

What's my, what is my reaction supposed to be to this?

What was that? What was my reaction supposed to be? Can we can we now agree that I was a little bit

vindicated? There were a lot of people that like Twitter made very confident because of the whole

millennial like body positivity thing.

These,

I don't know,

these millennials really were just like so confident in themselves because like this

delusional like culture they created where everyone is beautiful or something.

I was not even trying to be that mean.

Um,

I could have been.

Okay.

Yeah, what,

what,

what was the point?

What,

what,

what,

buddy,

what did you mean by this?

What was, what was the meaning of that what were you what was what was the the bad guy why was i the unreasonable one why was i treated as such an

awful person i was shy i was like, I was new to the internet.

To be honest, I was just like, no, okay, the one that takes the cake, genuinely the one that takes the cake is this. It's just like, just so random.

Like, what was the point?

What was the point of this?

It's just like random.

Like, oh, this is the epitome of an attractive person.

I don't understand.

I was, I'm really confused.

I'm still confused to this day.

And like, it was kind of a joke in a way it was i yeah it was a joke my original tweet was a joke

but then getting flooded in the quote tweets i was just like um so are do we just not have self-awareness on the internet? Is there just no self-awareness? And then I'm like, oh, you've just banned everyone who imposes self-awareness on you back then when Twitter was a bubble. That was a dark fucking time. When they were all gassed up and confident because Biden won,

it was such a strange time. It's like

people were retarded. They had no self-awareness

at all. Like they could not tell

when you're joking. Not even, not just that, but like

so

do we just have no self-awareness are we just devoid of

self-awareness are we just uh yeah so this is millennials this is why i hate them and i hope they

die in a video game.

I very much dislike millennials, and it's their culture of millennials, to be clear.

I hate millennial culture.

If you are a millennial, I recommend just adopt the culture of something else besides the millennial one because i see the no king's protests and i'm like

hmm it the no kings protests and i'm like hmm

it people oh you're just doing

culture wars no i'm not this is objective truth

there's something inherently false

and delusional

about it there's something about it that is basically

just um about it. There's something about it that is basically just a denial of reality itself and an insane level of...

It's just a false response and reflection of the world that corresponds

to the parasitism

of the professional petty

bourgeoisie, the BuzzFeed, professional

HR bourgeoisie of the millennials,

these hipsters who

own the fucking

burger joint where they charge

$25 for a fucking burger

that were entirely

carried and they have the man bun

and they have the lumberjack shirt

and they were entirely carried

by the imperialist

super pro-

yeah that's the labor aristocracy

by the way

for all you Maoist

third world is

who the fuck do you think

the labor aristocracy is

it's not the fucking coal

miner

okay oh well the coal miner

has a lot of money

no he has a lot of overhead fucking operating

costs for all the fucking equipment he owns and all this shit he needs like his big truck oh there

you have a big truck yeah the truck they use for work that they literally it's an operating cost

it's not a form of luxury for them.

In any case, for the blue collar, I hate when people say blue collar workers are paid so much.

Yeah, because the cost of their fucking labor is that expensive because of the fucking operating costs

of the fucking machines that they use.

Raff,

what's up?

Those are not the labor aristocracy the labor aristocracy is the office millennial class that gets paid to sit on their ass and do nothing and there's been mass layoffs of that specific class because of the rise of AI, and now they're trying to make themselves and portray themselves the revolutionary vanguard.

No, you're not. You're a reactionary generation. They're a reactionary generation, to be clear.

Fundamentally reactionary

generation.

They talk so much about

Big Tech and the evils of Big Tech.

We don't disagree. We're against

Peter Thiel. We're against Palantir.

Of course we are.

But where were they

with respect to Wall Street? Where were they

with respect? Can they even

name the money managers of

Wall Street? Can they even name

the major hedge funds? Can they

even name the non hedge funds? Can they even name the non-celebrity capitalist class, the ones that don't have, you know, a huge presence in the mainstream with respect to PR?

No, they can't.

Of course they can't, right?

Because they don't care.

So that is the rotten, awful truth of the matter.

They regard themselves as the revolutionary vanguard. They're dead weight. They're a source of

profound cringe. They're on blue sky. They're still refused to accept reality. They're still

engineering a fake artificial world that they live in, a safe space, if you will.

Because they are in denial and they have delusions.

And a conversation with even one of them will reveal that.

One of these blue sky, no kings people.

Just one conversation will reveal that they do this kind of double-think.

I know I'm using like conservative slop terms.

I don't fucking care.

I'm pretty tired tonight.

I don't know.

I'm not tired.

I have high energy.

What I'm trying to say is that seeing that video of the frogs dancing gave me flashbacks to the struggle I had on social media

when I first came onto the internet with all of these subhuman, disgusting, filthy beings.

And I'm so merciful and I'm so forgiving and I'm such a good person now.

Because I don't see them anymore. Because I either blocked all of them or they all fucked off to blue sky. So I don't see them anymore because I like either blocked all of them or they all fucked off to blue sky.

So I don't see them anymore.

They blocked me.

So I don't see them anymore.

I still hate them.

I still

really despise them.

That didn't change.

And that's not going to change, by the way.

Not going to change.

So this is the, okay, to get a little serious, I know I'm simplifying a lot of things. I'm doing it for the purposes of

hyperbole. The truth is there is a contingent of people who attend no kings protests who are potentially reasonable, potentially capable of being one over to the cause. But there is a considerable

number of people who were part of the MAGA movement, who you could say the same thing for,

if not more. i would say more by the way what i don't understand is why are we crucified on the cross of all of maga's sins and errors,

and then of course Trump himself,

for employing a strategy of attempting to disseminate

class consciousness

and cultivate the existing revolutionary consciousness among MAGA.

But that's sinful because among MAGA,

there are all these false problematic ideological tendencies.

And then, of course, Trump himself and the Republican Party and so on.

But then when they advocate the same strategy but at the no-kings protest, well, let's look

at the no-kings protests.

Organized by a Zionist couple from Washington, D.C.

Liberal Zionist, of course.

Majority of the people that go there,

their prevailing ideological tendencies

are pro-NATO, pro-Liberal Zionism,

and, of course, pro-CIA, pro-CIA, pro-American deep state versus budget cuts and so on. Why is one sinful and the other is permitted? Well, because the deciding factor happens to be culture. They say we're upset with culture war. No, or not, they are. Because what's the difference? Why is one, oh, we're just going to go educate people about communism. It doesn't mean we agree with everything. So why is that so hard to do for Maga people?

Well, Maga is inherently Zionist, whereas no Kings isn't.

Why?

Think about.

Why?

Is that based on a materialist analysis of any kind?

Because let's follow the fucking money.

How do these fucking people get their

salary? Where do they fucking get it from? I guarantee you, you follow the fucking money in one case.

You see a material incentive to support Zionist hegemony. Of course these people have to find

a moral justification for their Zionism in contrast to the right wing.

They're also right wing, by the way.

But the difference is they sanctify their Zionism with the pretence of morality,

with the pretense of some kind of justification.

Which is arguably worse, if you think about it.

Liberal Zionism,

the designism of Bernie Sanders,

the Zionism of AOC.

It is not incrementally closer

to a pro-Palestinian

position. That's not how it fucking works,

where there's a spectrum

of, well, I'm a little more critical of Israel,

and then farther along, incrementally,

I become pro-Hamas, and then

you're one of these brainwashed

evangelicals

or uneducated types

and you might be

pro-Israel or something. And then it's in

the opposite direction. That's not how it fucking

works. Because that ignores the dimension

of how the anti-Zionist position is qualitatively distinct from all hegemonic ideologies anti-Zionism entails not an incremental logical conclusion from aOC Bernie style liberalionism anti-zionism entails a fundamental qualitative rupture

with the hegemony that is why there's an easy pipeline from maga to being anti-zionist

we're seeing that we've been seeing that for years it's easy it doesn't

matter where you start out as the question is what material factors incentivize the qualitative

rupture with the hegemonic consciousness that allows you to be a conspiracy

theorist and fundamentally break from the narratives that are officiated within mainstream institutions.

I don't care. Look. Okay, look, Cala Walsh. Cala, Calla, Calla Walsh. A Cala Walsh is not a big fan of me. And I don't care, frankly. Cala has said, I don't care. I just don't care.

Cala is, you know...

She's her. She's her, right? What can I say?

Do I respect her?

Okay, I do. Okay, but...

But, okay, we can be

enemies in a superficial way. I don't care.

Not real enemies, though, to be honest.

But I honestly, I do respect her.

Like, in all honesty, right?

But I'll tell you why I respect Callowalsh.

And I'm not a fucking feminist, so fuck off with this shit.

Oh, you're just...

Please, you know, sometimes, guys, when I say something nice,

or I show some kind of sense of like, I'm willing to transcend pettiness and, you know, express a mature position.

Some of y'all take it too far. And then you just start, like, kissing people's ass and you're like oh

we're me listen

I'm a fucking realist

I'm not I literally

it's not an open door to start

telitubbies and Barney the dinosaur

right

it's an open it's just let's be fucking principled and straight up telitubbies and Barney the dinosaur, all right?

It's an open,

it's just,

let's be fucking principled and straight up

about our shit,

straight up.

You don't have to be friends with anyone.

She doesn't have to be friends with us,

vice versa,

for us to recognize.

She's principled.

And there's something about her

that we can respect.

Doesn't mean we have to agree with her

about everything.

Doesn't mean that on a personal level

we have to be friendly.

It means we

we're about some real ass shit

straight up on some real ass shit. Straight up on some real ass shit.

When I found out she moved to Lebanon to Beirut, I was like, okay, maybe she's probably not a Fed.

You know?

Anyway, let me talk about Callowalsh.

So, Callowals represents a kind of pipeline from the liberal direction of acceptable

manifestations of so-called anti-Zionism that are acceptable within institutions to a genuine anti-Zionist position.

You can disagree with Cala about a million different things.

You can't say she's a Zionist.

She's absolutely an anti-Zionist.

Okay, so we can accept that Cala Walsh is an anti-Zionist, right? It's basically common sense.

But notice how her position is unacceptable within respectable society and its institutions.

Academia, the media,

NGOs, activist culture.

Why is Cala Walsh, persona non-grata

within that world?

Why is there this air of ominous, oh, stay away from Cala. Stay away from Cal. Why is there

this kind of ominous? She's basically canceled when he fucking think about it. She's not transphobic.

She's not homophobic. She's not guilty of any of these Lib Tart sins. They crucify people on the cross-off.

So why is there this ominous air of

Cala is, uh, no good?

Why is there this thing surrounding Cala Walls?

Well, I'll tell you why.

Because she engaged in a qualitative leap

from institutionally accepted,

whitewashed manifestations

of anti-Zionism,

which are just vaguely about some kind of

support for Palestine,

whatever, watermelon,

you know, free Palestine, peace sign.

Kala supports the axis of resistance.

Kala went to Iranan next to iranian missiles cala very likely uh endorses the russian smo or at least rejects, fully rejects, the Kiev regime.

And it's the fact she aligns herself with military hard power, anti-hegemonic forces in the world that makes her persona non-grata.

Because she has stepped out of the imperialist hegemony,

and she now aligns herself with the objective material forces of anti-imperialism. I don't care how much you can launder

a superficial, sanitized, activistic form of anti-Zionism within your local Democratic Party club.

I don't care how much you can launder it in your academic institutions. I don't care how much you can launder it in your academic institutions. I don't

care how much you can have New York Times writers who are sympathetic to Gaza and are critical of

Benjamin Nanyahu. That doesn't matter ultimately. When you make the leap and when you commit the step of whitewashed forms of anti-imperialism, which are really just roundabout ways of morally sanctifying the imperialist machine when you think about it to an objectively anti-imperialist position like Callow Alstead, you will be canceled in the same fucking way that a right-winger, who is anti-Semitic, anti-Zinist, who, you know, post-Hitler edits or something, you'll be filed in into the same canceled compartment or corner and the same air

of ominous distrust

that looms over

some kind of

Jake Shields

is going to loom over

Callowalsh.

Doesn't matter what she thinks

about transgender

nobody gives a fuck.

And why am I

saying this, guys? Because that's how we appraise

revolutionary strategy.

Which populations are more equipped

to absorb the cancellation that

Cala Walsh has to go through. Well, it's not the office HR employees

that attend the No King's protest. I'm sorry, it's not. I would expect that the people who can

absorb being canceled like Callowalsh's are the people whose labor is valorized on the basis of material work and not affectivity and not emotions and not ideologies and not affectivity

and not emotions and not ideologies

and not psychologies

like you know where you you show up to

the

I don't know the sawmill or some

shit

you show up to some kind of

fucking construction site.

And they don't ask you what your fucking opinion

on X, Y, and Z is because they don't give a fuck.

Can you fucking pick up a hammer and

fucking hammer some nails

in? Can you fucking weld some shit?

Can you just fucking get this shit done?

This is a very vulgar, vulgar kind of Marxism, I'm asserting right now. I just see it as common sense.

How, how, who, which demographics can handle being canceled like Callowalsh's?

Sure, sure, the blue sky, go to blue sky protests and radicalize people.

Get them to say free Palestine.

Get them to superfic free Palestine get them to

superficially endorse

communist oh would you let

live in a stateless classless society

yeah get them to endorse all this shit

hell maybe you'll even show them a hakeem video

and they'll change their mind about the Warsaw Pact ever so slightly.

And they'll praise the achievements of socialist Vietnam.

Maybe if you get them to that much of an extreme point.

But on a mass level, on a mass level on a mass level are they ready to join the deplorables the canceled are they ready to be considered persona non grata and respectable, open society,

like Calais, are they ready for that?

Fuck, no, they're not.

They're really not.

And they'll never be.

Most of them will never be.

Those that, you know, what's so disgusting about the U.S. left is it's so implicit that there's a line you never cross.

Never, ever, ever go so far as to do what Cala did.

Right?

Like, how many of these people would actually go to Iran?

How many these people would actually fucking take that radical step of being like, you

know what?

I like Putin.

You don't even have to like Putin.

It's the principle.

It's what it represents.

It's this kind of,

uh, fuck it. What? Do I need to spell it out? It's a kind of muscular opposition of some kind. The minute you take a leap, they're like, oh shit, you're actually serious

about this shit? Oh shit.

They're all like,

Oh, yeah, free Palestine, free... Oh, shit, you mean it?

Oh, fuck!

No, you're actually on some, like...

Oh, shit, you mean it?

Yeah, I'm against Yeah. I'm against

capitalism. I'm against

imperialism. I'm against...

Oh, shit. You mean it?

That's like, you see the oh shit moment?

It's a qualitative leap.

And I'm not talking about adventurism.

I'm talking about getting to the point where you're actually going to stand on some fucking business by way of commitment,

meaning I'm going to commit to a principle and to an authority that is fundamentally disaligned with the ruling institutions of society.

Even if I'm going to be marginalized, even if I'm going to be accused of being in a cult,

or I'm going to be accused of being part of some

shadowy Russian whatever

I mean like that leap is very different

when you're actually like

listen we have sympathizers

in all the institutions of society

we absolutely in academia

in media

I don't disrespect these people I don't disrespect these people. I understand you're living your fucking life. You're not going to throw your life away for us. And I, I don't, I don't hate you for that. But I'm real, I don't, I also don't hate you for that.

But I'm real, I don't, I also don't consider you the exemplary class archetype that we have to win on a mass level.

And a lot of these people agree with me, you know, when I talk to them, they'll be like, look, Haas, I support you, support you guys, you guys are great.

I just can't really throw my life away.

You know what I tell them?

I say, listen, bro, or listen, sister.

I never say that to women, but whatever.

Look, I don't. Like, once. Yeah, I'm going to say, look, I get it, and it's not personal, and I don't even think less of you necessarily.

Because it's not an individual problem.

It's a class problem. On a class class level you're just not part of the the revolutionary you're not the revolutionary subject so to speak and that's

okay most people are not millennial narcissists who have to personally be the rest i'm a fucking

streamer how many fucking streamer.

How many fucking streamers am I going to go radicalize?

You think I'm stupid?

Of course not.

I'm an exception.

So,

you know,

I'm a law student

before I was a streamer.

How many fucking law students? No, I'm an exception student before I was a streamer. How many fucking law students are?

No, I'm an exception.

Not the rule.

You understand?

So it's not a matter of personal hate.

I'm not a crazy person who fails to understand.

Yeah, we're going to have sympathizers all over, which is great.

And we support, we, we, we, I fuck with them heavy.

They do a lot of favorites for us.

For sure, they're great people.

But, uh, but they'll tell me the, the plain truth.

They'll be like, look, guys, the reason you guys will not be as accepted as the DSA are here, the reason you're going to have a tougher time with the administration, the reason you guys, it's going to be harder for you is because, you know, you actually stand with Russia and China and North Korea and like you're actually on some real ass shit.

Like you represent this like totally like you're actually like you mean it when you say you're a communist the problem with you guys is you mean it

in the sense that like no you like straight up are this completely opposing principle

um versus our entire institution.

I mean, our institution can only be so flexible,

but at the end of the day, you know,

if you're actually seriously a communist,

of course you should expect persecution, you know?

So, train, what's up?

And it's like there's an implicit understanding across the entire institutional left that this is the case.

There's an implicit understanding that if you're on some real ass shit,

that's not how you play the Game of Thrones.

They think they're like these cynical HBO Game of Thrones characters.

You play the Game of Thrones.

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

You're just playing the long game.

Keep telling yourself that.

All right. Y'all, I'm on some high-energy shit.

I haven't slept. I on some high energy ass shit

all right you guys don't understand what's some high energy ass shit right um anyway let's uh

let's help my eyes a little bit.

Wow, it's so much better.

That's much better.

Anyway, guys,

yeah, I mean, this is the truth.

So we're very pragmatic when it comes to this.

Which populations and demographics can sustain the cancellation, that Cala Walsh, and we're going to use Callowals as an example, that Callowalsh, and we're going to use Callowalsh as an example, that Callowals can suffer.

How many of them can openly at their workplace espouse Cala Walls rhetoric and ideas without fundamentally destroying their reputation socially.

Is it a welder?

Or is it somebody who has to

explain to Ethan Klein and other

Zionist Jewish gatekeepers

and apologize and kiss their ass

about how much they're not an anti-Semite,

how much they sympathize with the Jewish people,

how much they support the Jews,

and, you know, who has to do that versus who doesn't?

That's what you have to think about.

All right.

I mean, like, remember the whole Ethan Klein versus Hassan Piker beef?

I could never imagine myself having to argue with

Ethan Klein. Who is he?

He's not even

Ethan Klein. Can you imagine if we had

to like explain ourselves to

Ethan Klein?

We don't have to explain. We don't share

the space. Who

do we have to? We're not Redditors. We don't have

to explain a fucking thing, bitch.

Oh but Stalin. Okay.

Kim Jong-un's a dictator.

Uh, uh, uh, what? Okay. Kim Jong-un's a dictator. What?

I'm sorry, like, you're unironically, like a fucking liberal, like unironically?

Like, not as a pejorative that we label these spineless libtard leftists. Like, no, you're actually a fucking lip-tard uh just kill

yourself dude like what do you want me to tell i what am i going to say to this person like

ethancline what would genuine what i say what would it okay go kill yourself like what do you want me to

do why would i ever explain myself to a person like that?

What possible? What could I possibly? I couldn't even fathom having to apologize and explain myself to liberal Zionist Jews about anything.

Hasbullah is based.

Who the fuck are you?

Like, you think I'm going to sit here and, like, do apologia?

I'm not apologizing for shit, bitch.

Right?

I feel like I'm crazy.

Don't repeat the shit in Discord.

Anything I say in Discord.

Never repeat it.

Never repeat anything I say.

Um...

No, but I'm just trying to say that, yes, there's a pipeline that comes from the liberal left, but the problem is that it can go very far, but when it runs up, MSPaint?

Wends if y'all want some MS paint.

Wends if you want some MS paint.

Y'all so, y'all want some MS paint?

Y'all think we want some MS paint I think

we're going to answer

about MS paint

you know

uh

look

I'll tell you

the the

the pipeline

stand

designism

so

so done Soldante

All right Great. Oh! Okay, I'm a professor young.

Okay, so you start as a Tuesday solution liberal.

And then, you know, you can go along the spectrum.

And you can be a critical, critical netanyahu okay and then you keep going and you can keep going and say that

you know uh you believe that uh uh, uh, you know, uh, Palestine, uh, is oppressed, uh, and then you can go, uh, they say,

free Palestine watermelon, And then you can go

You know

Norman

In Norman

Finkelstein.

And then you can go, you know, this spectrum that I'm showing you right now, this spectrum that I'm showing you right now, this spectrum, we're going to call it the liberal pipeline, okay? Liberal pipeline. Okay? And then we're going to call the VEval pipeline. Okay. And then we're going to call the vector right here anti-Zionism. But we're going to

crucially put the arrow right here. so okay so so the more you're going this direction, okay, so you think if we go to no kings, this is very easy. So this pipeline is very easy.

This pipeline is quick and easy okay it moves very fast

the radicalization process instantaneous

all you have to do is get to this point. And the radicalization process,

instantaneous, very smooth, very easy. You can go to a no king's protest and find a two-state

solution lib, and there is a lot of fluidity, a lot of difficulty, not a lot of

difficulty at all, to get them from here to here.

It's very easy.

It's very quick.

But what's the problem?

Okay.

The wall of Calala okay the wall of Kala basically it leads to this position of let's just call it um let's say iran Okay.

The wall of Kala, okay.

So let's just say the, um,

okay. Okay. To pass the wall of kala is it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than get a libtard to pass through the wall to overcome the wall of cala literally okay so this is the problem

this is the problem.

It is easier for a camel to...

It's really fucking hard.

It's not easy.

Do you understand?

Like, this is super easy.

There's so much conductivity and fluidity here it's super easy but there's a qualitative

rupture of cancellation you have to pass through and liberals it's extremely it's almost

impossible for them to pass the wall of cala okay now let's look at the

the uh the maga pipeline all right so we're going to basically replicate this okay

we're going to kind of replicate this

and uh

and then we're going to put the wall of cala back

okay

fuck back, okay. Okay, so I'm Professor John. I'm going to teach you how to do this all right

wait No.

Whoopsies. okay

uh

this is the anti-zionist vector

okay

right here same thing we're just going to copy and paste some of this

let's just call this the wall of um this is kind we're going to include tucker it's kind of not just the

wall of kala anymore it's also tucker and so on right all right so let's talk about the maga pipeline maga pipeline

so you start right here, which is... Okay, you start here.

All right.

The evangelical slop so this is the wall of maga or sorry this is the maga pipeline

okay now what's MAGA. Or, sorry, this is the MAGA pipeline.

Okay.

Now, what's the crucial difference? The difference is...

There is no space within here for any anti-Zionism, not even nuanced.

Think about that so within the liberal kind of discourse there is space okay within the liberal

discourse there's this kind of pipeline, Hassan Piker, pipeline that is very much possible.

All right?

Within the MAGA pipeline, there is no space.

Let's just call this, okay okay let's name the space um All right.

So, like, there's two different forms of

so like

there's two different forms of

so within institutions. All right. So within these institutions, there is a lot of fluidity.

Okay?

You can go from here to here very easily.

I spelled his name wrong on purpose, whatever.

Okay. So... Okay, so, now, within the MAGO pipeline, within the kind of institutional space, there is no space for anti-Zionism at all okay so there's no motion you think no motion right so in this case you think there is no possibility of any kind of motion, right? Wrong. Wrong. Because let me tell you,

this is the fucking difference. This is the difference. Who understands?

You go from zero to a hundred right away.

you understand. You go from zero to a hundred right away you don't have to uh Thank you. So once if you get it.

Here, you can go here.

The farthest you can take them is right here.

You will never breach the wall of Cala for the Libtards.

But for MAGA, I agree.

Within the traditional institutions of the Republican Party,

you'll never, ever, ever even be able to think about

even this, being critical of Netanyahu. Not possible. But this red pill dynamic of being,

see, the wall of the wall is breached do you understand there's a breach in the wall

so this wall is very solid you see this wall is very very solid this wall is very very solid this wall is very solid. You see, this wall is very, very solid.

This wall, there's cracks in this wall.

There's a lot of cracks in this wall.

So they can flood through.

These cracks are very, you know, porous.

So, to compare them, you know. In this case, there are major cracks in the walls hegemony that make consciousness very instant quick to develop abruptly the walls are porous.

Am I spelling porous right?

Fuck my life.

How do I spell it?

Hurry, hurry, hurry, spell porous.

Okay, I did it right.

All right.

Now, in this case,

in this case, the wall is basically completely solid.

To pass the wall means to, there are maybe some possible cracks cala but not on a mass level. Now, here's the crucial thing.

Crucial thing, okay? This is what they don't want you to know.

Pass the wall of Cala. Everyone becomes the same. Thank you. fully uh...

uh... You see?

Pass the wall, everyone's the fucking same.

You make it out.

And by the way, I'll put one porous crack here.

Um... And I'll put, like, right here.

See, like, that's an example of that you know i just fucking make this more clear

you see so uh You see?

So, who understands?

Ones if you get it. Default MAGA

GOP consciousness

is very unstable

and prone to radicalization

into something completely

distinct

default libtard

consciousness is very

closed to change

very stubborn very conceited very uh know it all very moralistic very hostile to

go beyond the boundaries of pre-programmed

uh... uh... it's the

it's the ETHIN KINDEffect

Okay. So So I it's the Ethan Klein effect okay so

so I rest my case

I'm the new

professor Jung

but a better version

you get it

default

MAGA GOP

consist super unstable prone to radicalization into something completely distinct.

Default Liptar Consist is very closed, very stubborn, very conceited, very know-it-all.

It may be open to reputable

uh

libtards are highly open-minded

to institutional actors

but they will

are

is almost

impossible for them to break

with the

institutional reality

institute

of institution

the way callo did.

You understand?

So Cala is a major exception.

Cala totally fucking broke out.

Total prison break.

Most Liptards,

it's impossible for them to do what Cal does.

And I'm not saying replicate Cala in terms of what she advocates for.

I'm saying like, the way she just straight up is like Syria under Assad was part of the resistance and the free Syria types are Zionists?

Bro, how many of these fucking free Palestine people on college campuses can straight up say,

fuck the free Syria people?

Like, how many of them can be like Assad?

Good.

None of them. Because I'm anti-Zai. I'm free Palestine, but also free,

you know, free Syria and free Xinjiang and free Taiwan and free Ukraine.

Free the Kurds.

So this is the problem with, you know, the simplistic notion when our enemies say, oh, but, you know, no king's people are more open-minded. No, they're not. This is their limit right here. Their limit is basically right here, basically. Norman

Finkelstein, historical, basically applying 1619 project to Israel is their limit. But they'll never,

they'll never go past the wall of Kala.

I'll say Assad.

They'll never fucking go past that wall.

You know, they'll maintain the pretence of moral superiority.

They'll never go past the wall.

Though their limit is Mity-Hassan.

They'll never go past that. They'll never go past that.

They can't go past it.

Who Who the fuck can argue with this?

I had a major lecture planned on Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution

and Marxism, Leninism and so on, and why I haven't finished my book.

I had a major lecture planned actually, but it seems like we'll save that one for Thursday while we transition.

Or maybe I'll just have it now.

What time is it?

We'll do it now.

Okay.

Uh, I want to, I want you guys to appreciate why I haven't finished the book.

And I want to talk about how basically, it's very hard to explain what exactly I do, beyond being chairman of ACP. What do I do as the

infrared guy, right?

And, you know, I've been thinking

about it.

And,

you know, so much of this

is maintaining a very, very coherent vision that is deeply difficult to communicate in any kind of like tangible, discrete way.

And yeah, it's some cult leadership.

I understand that.

But to have the infrared vision, you have to have a certain aesthetic, you have to have a certain kind of visual universe that you're maintaining that's combined with a specific kind of elicitation of, you know, mental states, psychologies, narrative, you know,

the actual effective communication of a narrative that successfully communicates and imparts a specific psychological disposition,

a specific imaginary kind of effect, specific imaginary universe, right?

And, you know,

a kind of specific trajectory

as far as communicating meaning, right?

And this is kind of the essence of what I do when you think about it.

I basically spend a lot of my time maintaining how it all comes together in one big coherent vision

and making sure that we are properly on course as far as not simply the direction

we're going in in terms of simple goals to be fulfilled like are we going to take power at this point or this time?

Not simply at the level of reaching a certain educational level, but basically maintaining a specific kind of subjectivity that allows us to perceive the possibility of a very specific future, right? Maintaining the sensibility, more or less, the sensibility of a completely new revolutionary outlook, a very specific way of looking at the world and responding to its various contradictions.

Now, unless everyone is here because of how handsome and good looking I am, the fact that you are here proves that I have managed to do this to some extent successfully.

In the strict sense that you see it as well.

You see how this shit makes sense, basically.

Like, it makes sense for you.

The sensibility of this position for you could not possibly entirely depend on my person,

you know, personally or physically. That would be ridiculous. That would basically be that everyone

just likes me so much just because of my charming smile or something.

It's not true.

You guys, I've communicated something to you that you're picking up what I'm putting down.

You see what I see to some extent.

At least to some extent, right?

And, but, you know, at the level of how we justify that vision to society, that's when we have some measure of difficulty, right?

That's when it's just there's... Unfortunately, I think this community, the majority,

overlying majority, presupposes the fact that they came from a Marxist or a communistic leaning background.

So, the specific message that I share is a specific message that presupposes already on some basic level, recognizing the meaningfulness of the communist experience in the 21st century and today.

I am kind of like a Martin Luther kind of message, right?

I have a message that there's a deep corruption.

Something has gone terribly wrong.

The revisionists have completely repudiated any semblance of Marxism, that Marxism, the real Marxism, has been forgotten, and so on and so on.

And this is what, there's something very powerful about my message because of the specific narrative, right?

The specific narrative about how the Soviet Union has gone in 1991.

But today, we cannot say it's all said and done, that communism in some sense is still objectively relevant.

And that, in fact, world history and even the cosmos itself is with us, right?

There's something very powerful about the narrative that the mainstream popularity of communist or socialist ideas on the internet and online is fundamentally a sci-op, right?

That mainstream liberal leftism is fundamentally at odds with the historical communist tradition.

Now, the reason I feel like that's a very powerful narrative is because it's also the fact that there's a revolutionary essence of communism that has been forgotten today.

The majority of communist parties worldwide, barring the ones in power, are revisionists, their sellouts.

Like, this exemplary case was the CPUSA.

I mean, I shit you not.

I remember when the CPUSA issued a letter condemning infrared,

and this was in November 2021

and I went live on Twitch

with like a thousand

concurrent viewers. Why did the thousand

people care about this?

I was so shy. I was like this is so niche.

Why do you, why are who the fuck are all these people who care

about this?

And then I realized like, well, it's the narrative that people cared about. Even people

who weren't communists were invested in the story that was unfolding.

And I mean, a lot of you are here because

you remember the story of what happened you have the record is straight for you you guys were here very open-minded maybe you weren't right or die but then you saw how people started reacting to the message expecting expecting maybe somebody could debunk cause, maybe somebody could actually respond to him or debate him, and then the ways they would have to go out of their way to lie, basically, and do...

Pull all these dirty, dishonest tricks.

I feel like it radicalized a lot of you, right?

And that's a narrative.

That's absolutely part...

I'm not saying it's a narrative

in some postmodern sense of it's devoid of objectivity.

It's absolutely objective. but you guys witnessed some shit right

in any case um that is a story that's a story that is not theory that is not theory that is a story which is not simply adjut prop and aesthetics.

That's a story that is real that we're a part of. It's a real fucking story. The story of this

fucking movement is very real. Okay? It's very real. real um the one who raised the question me of why is it that communists have become

spine self-reclained communists have become spineless cowards and sellouts and why have they fundamentally become divorced from the masses uh what excuses are there really for the decline of the communist movement

and fuck it we could go farther

why did the USSR dissolve

in 1991

if I'm

relitigating these questions

and saying that there's some fuckery afoot that something is wrong here

there's a fundamental injustice and betrayal right that is at the heart of this um there's something

very very powerful and compelling about that.

But that story, that story is not a book.

It's not a documentary, although maybe it could be, in all honesty.

That would probably be the best thing it could be.

But it's not an aesthetic.

First, it's a story.

Okay?

First, it's the structure of a narrative and a story.

And that's something that I am not creating.

I am not an educator who's creating a story and feeding it to you.

Because I'm part of the story myself.

I'm just keeping a count and speaking the truth about what's happening or what has happened as far as

we are concerned right and uh now what am i talking about here um keeping a correct record of this narrative or this story and continually reaffirming exactly how we can respond to the world as it is, is a feat.

I can't talk about it without being cringe, but it is kind of like meme warfare type of thing.

Like you have to have the right memes always.

You have to have the right vision of what is our current orientation?

What memes are we communicating?

How do we like maintain that we're on proper course with respect to the to the production

of memes basically. Like are,

is the shit we're putting out reflective

of the correct path or not?

And this is not

simply at the level of theory. It's not

simply at the level of aesthetics and it's not simply at the level of theory it's not simply at the level of aesthetics

and it's not simply at the level

of telling a story it's all

of those things combined do you understand

uh kind of like

memetic engineering it kind of but it's it's very authentic

in the sense it's it's truthful it's very authentic in the sense it's

truthful. It's not like you're doing it

to manipulate people. You're trying

to communicate a kind of

integral, pre-conceptual

subjective

disposition or

position, right? With respect to the facts of the history of the world so far and the world we live in today. I know this, a lot of this sounds so like ambiguous, but if you know concretely what our positions are, you should fill in the blanks.

And, like, the move, so to speak, for me,

is maintaining all of that,

which is a tremendous amount of energy,

as far as I'm concerned um synthesizing how all

of this comes together into a position that it is possible for you and hundreds and thousands of

other people to have and thinking about

thinking about what the next signifier is going to be

or is objectively.

And a signifier is going to be or is objectively and a signifier i spent years before infrared even started obsessing over um the lacanian notion of a signifier right and um specifically you know i don't want to get into it this kind of

notion of the discovery or emergence of a new signifier, right?

You don't know what that means. That's okay. You don't have to.

But signifiers are basically the pre-conceptual

uh register that we have that communicates to us continuously

meaning it's not just in one time that we see a sign in it whatever it's continuous kind of

uh... absorption and uh... registration

so to speak

at the unconscious level right so at a preconceptual even

not necessarily strictly

rational level of conscious rational thinking

of

what

is meaning?

What is the basis

upon which all of our language rests,

right? Orvo, what's up? So,

if I say, for example, this is a pair of glasses.

When I say meaning, I'm not saying

it's like, what is meaning in the sense of

what I should live for? It's more like,

how can I meaningfully refer to this as an

intelligible thing? And when I speak about it, situate that reference within a kind of wider cosmos.

For example, this is a pair of glasses simultaneously means it's also not this cup of tea and it's not this cell phone and it's not this and it's different in this and that way.

And here's how the glasses fit into my life i wear them i go

outside with them i read this book and you know this is a cosmos so this is a matrix of meaning right

and it's not given we we go through life thinking that's given to us and it's just like a

a fact of nature it's just a fact of the universe

so to speak and but it's not it's not it's that order specifically we have to continuously affirm

our place within it and it itself has to continuously disclose itself to us for us to partake in it, right?

And if you don't believe me, look at schizophrenics. A schizophrenic cannot meaningfully talk about this pair of glasses.

A schizophrenic will say, this pair of glasses is also the pair of glasses that unfolds in the

demetrical way. And when I put it on here, I'm also putting it in my pants, and I'm also putting it on

my hair, and I'm also, the aliens are also wearing it right now and you're

wearing it and while you're looking at me and the guy right there is also wearing these glasses that I'm

wearing right. There's a breakdown of the ability to basically

situate the order of signification within an order, right? There's a breakdown of the order.

There's a breakdown of this kind of metanumic chain of signifiers. Everything slips into

everything else indistinguishably. And the fact that there are schizophrenics and psychotics proves that our sanity, right, the way we participate into this cosmos in this world, is not given by virtue of nature, by virtue of something that is just devoid of labor, devoid of energy, right? It's contingent. It has conditions. It's dependent. So, you know, the question of the signifier is that ultimately all of our, all of the things in our world that we experience, all of the

determinate given things, from this pair of glasses to Mao Zetong's little red book, quite

literally anything, right?

All of them fit within a specific cosmos,

but the cosmos itself isn't fixed, meaning, I guess if you want to put it in Marxist terms,

all of this fits within a very specific way in which human beings reproduce their conditions of subsistence as a definite form of life activity, right? To quote Marx from the German ideology. But these conditions of subsistence,

this mode of production, is itself suspended in a process of change, okay? And it's not fixed and so

what we call the cosmos

here in this case

is not something that is fixed

the cosmos itself is

suspended

fully and entirely.

But what is it suspended in?

Okay?

That's the question.

It's like in Twin Peaks.

I think it's Monica Balucci, something.

She asked

David Lynch.

She says,

everything is a dream. Then she says,

who is the dreamer, right?

And Twin Peaks

the return. Well, who is the dreamer? It's kind of the same question of.

For what is all of this moving?

Okay, everything suspended in motion.

For what?

Why?

What glues together the meaningfulness of my entire world and my entire universe it can't be something that pre-exists me or in the sense pre-exists my activity because my activity actively participates in it, right, and reproducing it.

So what is it? What is the thing that compels the movement of the heavenly bodies, so to speak?

What is the thing that compels the movement of all of the things

that we do in our life, all of the ways in which we make meaningful sense of the things around us

as they register in our unconscious as signifiers well the idea is that there's a

master signifier right there's a metanumic chain of okay how do you define any given thing is that

it's not this other thing and there's a kind of chain of signification

that is based on metanumi.

Everything is because of

the nexus and matrix

of what it is not, right?

And so, okay.

Okay, but ultimately there's a referentiality with respect to the signifier of signification itself.

There's a specific signifier whose sole signification itself. There's a specific signifier

whose sole signification

is the order

itself, the order of the

symbolic order, right?

So that's the master signifier for LaCon

which he is

developing within the kind of Oedipal framework.

So, for example, this is why in Freudian psychoanalysis, the relationship to the father is very much related to sanity. Okay, if you, uh, if you, um, have a problem with your father or something and you have this big issue, this big chip on your shoulder, specifically if you're a man,

it's kind of a vector in the direction of psychosis and schizophrenia.

You lose reality itself, you know?

But the reason for that is because a father usually takes the form within the interpolation of subjectivity as a master and communicates the master signifier, right?

That's from where the master signifier is communicated.

I don't want to get into Psychobabble because I hate that.

Right?

And I don't want you guys to ask any questions

before I'm fucking finished with this shit.

For real.

Don't derail me because the ability for me to deliver those lecture is already very difficult

because I am awake for a very long time, okay?

Speaking of which, I have to protect my fucking eyes

anyway

um

so that's the meaning of a master signifier right

well in the edible framework

when the master signifier is no longer, when the Oedipal structure, so to speak, of the Baromian knot, the symbolic, the imaginary, the real, kind of breaks down, and the process of the, you know, movement of desire to drive when you realize that behind all of my desires and fantasies, there is just this kind of specific drive, right, which is not

necessarily based on the attainment of a specific imaginary outcome. Freud's

Oedipal complex is

I'm not going to even talk about it because it's pretty gross

but you know

the so-called psychoanalytic

cure for Lacan

kind of ends with a type of subjective

destitution.

Instead of the classical Freudian case where you just become a healthy, whatever,

Lacan says the Oedipal complex is fundamentally pathological,

and the way to kind of escape its symptom is through something he calls subjective destitution, right?

Subjective destitution is more or less the realization that the big other itself, so to speak,

as this kind of omnipresent

symbolic order of the they

out there, right?

It itself does not know itself

and in the

I don't know how to explain this in a way

that you'll actually fucking understand.

More or less, you cease to regard yourself as the subject of the symbolic order, and you begin to recognize in the relationships of

signifiers to

themselves something

objective that is

just not about

you specifically

okay

now Lacanians will

shoot me for

simplifying it in that

way but I don't give a fuck.

I invite them to simplify it in a better way.

Um,

in any case,

uh,

now,

okay, fuck, there's like so much I just threw out there.

Bringing it all back in.

Ultimately... ultimately the the what we can call a master signifier which signifies only the symbolic order itself the order of signifiers right signifiers of the unconscious how that comes to emerge and how that comes to be is through the communication of for what it is all for in some sense. And for what it is all for, if you have a dialectical view, is a specific process, a specific circuit, and that is the wisdom, okay?

That is the kind of object of wisdom, I should rather say.

Not wisdom itself.

It's the object of wisdom.

Meaning when you get it and you understand what life is really for, put it this way.

I'm going to explain this to you in an extremely vulgar, retarded, like, Nietzschean, Buddhist, pseudo-intellectual

retard view, right? Imagine you're like some

Buddhist guy who goes to Tibet and you want to

discover the enlightenment in the meaning of life, right?

And then you sit around and you have your legs crossed and then you meditate for 10,000 years and you do all the stupid things.

Carry this water to the pond and carry it back 10,000 times and then you will learn.

Okay.

But then suddenly you have an epiphany through undergoing some kind of rigorous process of initiation and discovery and enlightenment and so on.

And then you have the epiphany, the aha moment that says, this is what it's all fucking for.

I understand now. i understand for what

everything moves that stupid cliche now forget of don't be attached to that scenario that i gave to you in any kind of way.

But if you get the gist of this idea that there's a specific kind of rhythm of being, there's a specific pattern, specific resonance, and a specific kind of dialectical logic and structure underlying all determinations,

then you can understand what is meant by a word like logos, right? That's what Logos is. Logos is what you discover at the epiphany moment. Ah, I have found the logos. I have found the logos.

I have found the fundamental pattern and structure that underlies existence, right?

And it's just that.

That's the word.

Logos is the word, okay okay the master signifier and that's what glues together the entire signifying chain that's what glues together my ability to meaningfully situate

the meaningfulness of a pair of glasses, a cup of tea, cell phone, a Lenin's statue, a book, all within one universe that they all exist within, by the way.

And I can say, this is not that, and that is not this,

because this is something I wear on my head,

and this is something I drink, and this is something I use,

and this is something I read,

and this is something who is someone who represents,

and so on and so on. on like the ability for all of that

to fit together into one matrix or world or of meaning or cosmos depends upon uh the fact that all of this

fulfills some kind of

greater pattern, some kind

of greater, that some kind of greater

logos underlies all

of it. Ultimately,

like, if you want to think about it like this,

this is not correct philosophically, but it's like, if you want to think about it like this this is not correct

philosophically but it's like

if you want to understand how

everything can fit

and be part of something greater

let's say your life

for you the meaning of life is that you want to become

the world's biggest

power lifter

or some shit, right? Well, in that case, it's like,

look, how does the pair of

glasses, it all fits together

because, you know, for me to

be a great power lifter, I have to protect my eyes

from the sun, and, you know, I have to have a cell phone so I could talk to my coach and all this kind.

There's a specific goal of your entire life that you are subordinating all the existence within your field of view too, right?

It's very easy to understand, something like that.

But instead of thinking about a goal that for you is the meaning of life, like this is my goal,

instead of thinking about it in terms of of a goal think about it as something like

more existential this is objectively the reality that i'm part of the world that i'm part of this is

objectively just what it is this is the nature of what it is, right?

And it has the kind of same structural significance that a personal goal for you can have because it's structuring the order of your world. You know, it's, it's

ultimately situating everything within some kind of story that has a beginning, middle,

and end, or a, a song, if you will,

or any kind of kind of structure, structured process or circuit, right?

And that is a dialectic, all determinations are themselves only meaningful within the context of the fulfillment of some kind of um dialectical process.

So, for example, and that process we call revolutionary.

Why? Because revolutions come full circle.

But a revolution comes full circle in such a way that you don't even know what your starting point was. When you return to your starting point, something new has been realized. A new qualitative determination. Revolutions by nature

have a structure. They have a beginning, a middle, and an end. They are finite. Every revolution

that you can name has an end. Revolutions necessarily must end.

Crucially, I'm saying revolutions. Do you understand? Now, the stupidity of the idea of a permanent revolution is that

every revolution is a particular process

revolutions must end

so there can't be

a permanent revolution

otherwise uh revolution otherwise you have stasis revolutions move right but all movement when all is said and done takes a circular form all All movement does. Ask any, uh, uh, what do you call a fucking

a mathematician who specializes in geometry. A geometrist?

What the fuck?

What do you say?

A geometer?

I don't believe that

a geometer

is that real

a topologist

should say topologist or a physicist

or a physicist or a

mathematical

mathematician,

all understand that all motion

takes a circular form.

All motion does.

There's no such

thing as an infinite vector motion that just kind of goes in one direction without in some kind of sense undergoing circling back so to speak, right?

Because if it's truly a rate of change, continuous rate of change in motion, then when you model that spatially, it takes a form of like a circle or something or spiral or something like that in any case I'm just

I have flashbacks to fucking pestle mimes

when Pestomime was in the Schiller

and they were telling me

the LaRouche people were telling me

about circles

as well they got that from Leibniz by the way

it's Leibnizian kind of

yeah sign wave

anyway um sorry kind of, yeah, sine wave.

Anyway,

sorry, I just had some flashbacks there.

So, this is the truth that permanent revolution is stupid.

But does that mean when a revolution is over,

that we can say that the principle, the revolution, Thank you. Now, if all revolutions have to come to an ones if you can hear okay if all revolutions have to come to an end

the trotskyites took this to mean the abandonment of the revolutionary principle entirely.

That Marxism-Leninism abandons the revolutionary principle.

And that the revolution coming to an end is the acquiescence of the kind of revolutionary dialectic to bourgeois metaphysics and stasis.

And so they attempted to depict Stalinism and Marxism-Leninism as ossifying and static and devoid of that kind of original, inseptial, revolutionary vigor and fire.

But what they don't understand is that when revolutions come to an end, that doesn't mean motion ends. That doesn't mean the processual structure of the revolution disappears. It means it takes a kind of cyclical form and thereby referring to it as a

revolution becomes superfluous. Why? Because it has become a qualitative determination. And that's the

essence of socialism in one country. Socialism in one

country was the October Revolution becoming a qualitative determination, right? In this case,

the USSR, as a country, country okay as a socialist country and this is more revolutionary

this is more revolutionary when the revolution ends that doesn't mean it's less revolutionary

than when it begins in fact it's less revolutionary than when it begins. In fact, it's more revolutionary.

When a revolution truly is completed, it's more revolutionary than when it began, because it finally becomes a qualitative determination, something it was not before.

And then finally, it clarifies what is revolutionary cosmos?

Revolutions clarify what truly is revolutionary cosmos in the same way that monotheism clarifies what truly is God. God is not this statue. He is not this specific form form on earth god is something beyond right in the same way

revolutionary cosmos is always beyond revolutionary cosmos can never be reduced to a specific

revolutionary process.

And every time a revolutionary process is fulfilled and completes,

it should deepen our appreciation of the true revolutionary cosmos,

which is always the integral whole.

It's never a specific process. It's never a specific

circuit, uh, of change. It is the all. And the all can never, by default, can never be reduced

to its parts, uh okay there was the revolution

completed in the ussr but also it began in china okay the revolution in china completed but also it began where Iran.

So this is the true appreciation of a kind of ontological principle of revolution, that Trotskyites never actually were able to comprehend because

they could never make peace with the fact that revolutions do end they do have a beginning and

end they have a structure they have a rhythm They have a structure. They have a rhythm. They have a life cycle. Who understood this? Who was a Stalinist before Stalin? Ibn Khalduin, right? In his macamuda, I think.

I've talked about it many times where he talks about the cyclical structure of dynastic change, revolutionary dynastic change.

So this, he said, a dynasty is like an organism, right?

It has a beginning, a middle, and end.

Alchemy.

Precisely, yes.

Yes, what we're talking about is what the alchemists refer to as a kind of great work, right? There is a processual logic

there that is structured. And by the way, this is a specific articulation of Logos. all logos is logos is when we give a name to a revolutionary process that is logos the logos underlying being is the structure and the pattern of transformation that underlies all things

so why am i saying all this well

in relation to why i can't finish my book

few things one and i i will finish it don't worry but i want to communicate

something very clearly before I do.

First of all, the task today, my task has always been the discovery and the ability to communicate with systemic redundancy, a specific logos that makes sense of the entire communist experience thus far.

This is the mission of infrared from the very beginning.

For what did all of this happen?

What does it mean to be a Marxist-Leninist

in the

post-COVID world and in the

21st century? For a new

era.

And how do we

make sense of socialism with Chinese characteristics, for example?

How do we make sense of the current vector of the development of world history?

A lot of big words, I understand.

Grand vague references, I understand.

But how... grand vague references, I understand.

But how do we synthesize all the revolutionary experience of modern history to this point as something that is meaningfully compelled by a single logos.

The thing that glues together and situates within some kind of cosmic order, everything.

Okay, I use the example of glasses and tea and so on and so on.

It's the same for history, though.

How do we fit the October Revolution experience in China, the entire revolutionary would experience in China,

the entire revolutionary communist experience.

1979 in Iran.

Fuck it, everything, right?

How do we...

How does that all become part of one cosmos?

That makes sense of

why everything took on the trajectory, the logic that it did,

the logic that it did. Okay, logic, logos. It's the same fucking thing. What is the underlying

rationale? What is the underlying rationality behind how things have unfolded thus far in the way they have?

And what does that say about how we can authentically reflect and relate to being now in an infinitesimal now.

What is the world we live in?

And what do the facts of recent modern history prove about the fundamental nature of humanity and life and all these giant questions itself.

That's always been the fucking mission of infrared.

Vex, I really disagree. Again, and this

is the problem. You're misunderstanding me.

It's not your fault, though. The problem is there's a vagueness that I can't fill.

And that's on to the topic of why I don't always have the morale to just power...

I get power through finishing the book tomorrow, right?

I'm very careful about every fucking word, every fucking sentence.

I'm so careful when I write.

And I'll tell you why.

Um,

no, the universe is not the

fatherland. Yeah, I just, please.

You know what I don't like that came out of infrared?

I don't like Christian schizophrenia.

There's a specifically Christian schizophrenia I don't like.

Just be a normal Christian, please.

Christian schizophrenia has never added anything of value to this community.

Okay?

And you guys are making a strong case for just Islam.

I'm not even lying.

If your only way to reconcile Christianity with the shit that I say is schizophrenia, just become Muslim.

Because it's a simplicity.

There's no Trinity.

It's just like a simplicity, uh, tahweed and so on and so on.

And it's like much neater than the schizophrenic shit you guys say sometimes.

And I say that as somebody who in some sense also thinks of themselves as a Christian,

and of course has an immense respect for the Christian religion.

But sometimes

you guys

are very much

not synthesizing things

and you're content with just like

I don't know, it's a schizophrenia

for sure. It's

schizophrenia. Schizophrenia pushes

okay, fuck it. If it works, it works. I'm not going to

police it. If you're fucking Christian

schizophrenia works, more

power to you.

But I'm trying to say something

a lot simpler, okay?

All right.

Anyway, let me continue.

Only a... No, of course not. Okay, look, because Christianity... only a

no of course not okay look

because Christianity is not schizophrenic

Christianity is

in practice

Christianity is not

it makes

it makes complete sense

in practice, Christianity.

The problem is

it leads to a kind of

when it's divorced from the

praxis of the Christianity,

which is what, the church congregation.

It's a perfectly simple thing, right?

But people are trying to create, okay, I'm trying to put something down and you're picking up something schizophrenic sometimes, right?

And it's because you are trying to translate into a kind of conceptual world, right, in the world of concepts, a specific,

logical, rational structure. But what I'm trying to communicate to you is a pre-conceptual kind of sublime

meaningfulness that maybe you have to be a Muslim to understand.

I'm not going to say that because zero Muslims understand anything I fucking say. And only Christians understand. I'm not going to say that. Because zero Muslims understand

anything I fucking say. And only Christians

understand what I say to any

extent, right?

Um... Um

What about being

Listen, I don't care about labels.

I really don't.

The day any fucking religious label divides any of us.

I'm going full fucking league of militant atheists i don't

give a fuck the minute any fucking religious label divides this army we're going full militant

atheist you understand the minute there's any religious prejudice or sectarian my religion is better than yours including if it ever came from me which it never will i'll never fucking say Islam is better than christian i'll never fucking say any shit okay these religions are supposed to guide and magnify

our revolutionary faith

and our unity.

In any case,

I have no problem.

It's because I have no problem.

It's because I have the revolutionary faith that I have no problem with any real religion.

And so many people find me suspicious.

How can you go in a church and be okay, Haas?

How can you go in a mosque? And you're, what are you real? Are you a

Freemason? No, I have the revolutionary faith, which makes sense of all the faiths to me.

In any case, let me continue my sermon, right?

How can you attain and communicate this logos?

That's the question.

Now, I'll tell you how infrared has approached this. How has infrared attempted to communicate this revolutionary logos, right? The thing for which it all moves. And, of course, movement never ceases.

But for what do things move?

For example, the heavenly bodies move.

For what?

For the sun, of course.

Right?

They revolve around something.

So for what do revolutions revolve?

Now, logos, let's play with words here a little bit, do some trickery.

It's like logo.

And you think about in today's global economy, a logo has this significance.

A logo is the sun for which so many different

processes

of production and supply chains

move

and function

to fulfill a brand or a logo.

It's like think about Disney as a brand or a logo. It's like, think about, think about Disney as a brand, just as a brand and just as a logo.

Is Disney a specific, tangible commodity or a product?

No, but the symbol of Disney, when you see that brand, you're looking at an entire network of global processes of production and specific supply chains, all that are made to realize of something that is intangible, a logo, a specific world, right? And these logos, these brands,

they are like cults. I mean, Disney is building neighborhoods or they built neighborhoods you

fucking live in. It's a specific way of life.

Brands acquire at a certain level a transcendent status. McDonald's is a specific sign of an entire

fucking set of habits and cultures and conventions

and ways of life. Disney is?

It's a fucking vibe. You see this person's

a fucking Disney adult? I could tell you what fucking toothbrush they use.

I could tell you what fucking underwear that they buy.

I could tell you what fucking habits they have,

how they pick their ass. Everything. Starbucks, I mean, you fucking name it. These brands, logos, they are like, they are, they are kind of like celestial bodies that can determine an entire matrix and nexus of different ways of life and habits that define people, right? And they have this transcendent status logos

becomes a kind of

super commodity

right

in any case

and the more

successful a brand is the more it encompasses a wider division of labor and

division of consumption the more you know a brand and everyone knows this one the more successful a brand

gets like apple for example apple is a cult apple has a specific

prescription about the meaning of life apple the more successful apple becomes you're going to have

apple homes apple cars apple uh toilets apple underwear apple apple uh grocery store, Apple everything, right?

Unfortunately, Apple's not successful enough to rise at that level.

But you want to know who fucking was? Amazon.

Can you give me a single fucking thing, single fucking industry, a single fucking

division of labor that Amazon

doesn't have its toes dipped in.

Fuck, some of these guys are even getting into military,

right?

So, but this is the nature

of today's global economies, and it all revolves around logo, okay? Logos, okay? And all Logos is is a specific structure of meaning through narrative, okay?

Not just through narrative, through,

through a, it's a logic of reproduction.

It's a logic of production and reproduction.

How do we make sense of our cycles, our ways of life, and so on and so on, right?

Okay.

You want to know another logo was, you want to know

another transcendent logos

logo is the CPC in China

it's the most

advanced one that exists in the world

today actually the most powerful

brand it's a transcendental brand

you want to know who else is trying to It's a transcendental brand.

You want to know who else is trying to be in a transcendental brand?

The AC motherfucker p.

Okay?

You fucking get it.

You understand.

And a truly transcendental brand

is beyond the

surface of the phenomenal world

transcendental brands are transcendent

they communicate a kind of rhyme, a specific deeper order, a deeper kind of relationality, not simply a specific aesthetic.

The deeper logic behind an aesthetic. Do you fucking understand?

Not only the deeper logic behind the aesthetic,

the deeper order within which that aesthetic exists within.

Okay, so let's go back to infrared for one moment.

Infrared

is symbol

is a globe,

a world, right?

It represents a world.

Infrared believed

in the beginning

that we could

communicate this

kind of new logos, new signifier,

and it would

have to be a full

spectrum attack.

It would have to be a full spectrum multimedia space that we occupy.

And here's why. Let's now get to the book thing. When I write in a book, I have a very specific intention as far as what specific visuals I want to pop into your head, what specific feelings I want to elicit into you, what specific evocations I want to make, what specific signifiers

that I communicate, and which specific chain of signifiers do those fit within?

Now, if I'm writing about apples in a basket maybe i find it implicit

that you're going to think about uh a little red riding hood or some shit who Who carries a fucking apple with baskets?

I don't fucking know.

Anyway, but maybe implicitly, I just have this assumption that this is where it fits within the chain of signifiers at the level the level of your register right but that assumption is

never justified because everyone has different experiences first of all more specifically

everyone has different media consumption habits.

I don't know all the fucking movies you've watched.

I don't know all the fucking shit you've consumed.

I don't. All the music you fucking listen to.

I don't know all the subcultures you've been exposed to.

In the heydays of the written form and in literature, let's say the 19th century, the 18th century, there was more of a uniformity as far as the cultural experiences that people would have.

Yes, there was a huge diversity, but it was segmented in terms of class, for example, very predictably.

And it was just, you know, people living in some bum fuck nowhere place would have similar kind of experiences.

So there's all these kind of psychosocial, imaginary, the threshold of imaginary experiences.

All these kind of things determine how you're going to make meaningful sense of a written text.

So for me, I could write a paragraph and it evokes something very specific, very specific for me.

But for you, it's completely fucking different.

Like, I'll write something

that has a message, like,

this is the message. Every time I fucking read it,

it reminds me of a specific

logos of images

and narratives, and it ends

with a conclusion that's like, that's the fucking

move. That's it's it right but for you

okay for me it's like okay i want to communicate the serene majesty of uh you know uh the bands of desert nomads rising and conquering,

in kind of affecting this beautiful justice,

and there's this kind of, you know, moral fulfillment.

And then I write that paragraph

and you read it and you're like,

oh, it's so like Conan the Barbarian

and we're just going to kill everyone.

I don't know. It's like

the vibe for you is different than what it is for me.

Because

these signifiers are sliding what it is for me. Because because

the signifiers

are sliding on entirely different

chains, chains of signifiers.

Why? Because

your

pre-given

um Your pre-given media literacy and sensibilities are just going to be different from mine and vice versa.

And there's no way to overcome that gap today.

And of course the internet

fucking changed

it big time.

Big time.

Internet changed

that big time.

Um,

like Orville said,

you know.

It's made it, so I've lost faith in the idea that I could write a book and successfully impart to you what I'm trying to say, so to speak.

And the best proof of that is the fact that Karl Marx wrote books. what I'm trying to say, so to speak.

And the best proof of that is the fact that Karl Marx wrote books, Lenin wrote books, Stalin wrote books, Mao wrote books, okay, Mao wrote books.

If Mao wrote books and today, there are transgender furies who read that shit and go oh yeah my mom's a transgender furry

how me how

precise is the medium of text

and being able to communicate your

intentions really how precise

could it possibly be

if the amount of wiggle room and diversity and variance of interpretations are possible?

Right?

So to control for all of the multifarious interpretations that come with a written medium,

you have to explore visual media.

You have to explore music and visual media and presenting what you're presenting in a specific narrative and chain of events, which is what

infrared did with our infrared vision videos when we launched.

You know, like that's the idea.

But then I realized something.

There's a missing piece as far as being able to communicate, which is how does a guy fucking make sense of this? Okay, I was pushed to live streaming because a crucial missing piece of the puzzles, like, how does a fucking guy process this shit how are you expected to process it what kind of emotion should you have how do you there's no way you're gonna fucking learn that until you look at me there's so much that i communicate that's beyond just what I tell you. For example, when I laugh, when I mock something, when I react positively or negatively, when I get angry, when I fucking crash out, all of these things are imprinting upon you a specific sensibility of like, okay, this is a pattern. I can make meaningful sense of this pattern. Do you understand that? And for you, it makes sense. It kind of fulfills a crucial part of logos for you, right?

That's why today's generations entirely get their entire personality for streamers.

You didn't get your entire personality for me, but you got a lot of your understanding of how to be a communist for me.

Ones, if that's fair to say, a lot of your, not, I'm not going to even say all, a lot of your understanding of how to meaningfully make sense of what it means to be a communist.

I think you got a lot of that for me, right?

Now, thankfully for you, all the other aspects of being a human being, you didn't get from me.

And I hope you didn't, by the way, because there's a lot of things

that I wouldn't want to impart upon others.

But for this generation,

every aspect of their personality,

they're getting from influencers and streamers.

I mean, down to the most minute levels

of their consumption habits and even the type of fucking women that they like and all this other kind of shit, right?

You guys have your diversity of taste and music and all this other kind of shit.

You don't fully emulate me in every respect

and i'm glad but that's not the tendency of today today the tendency is people are modeling their

entire existence off of uh watching influencers well why because that's the universe for them. That's where they're getting that master signifier. They can't get it from their fathers and their parents anymore because their parents are not adapted civilizationally to the society that we live in

because they don't know

how to fucking type

and send an email.

So how could they

meaningfully participate

in society

and today's level

of the threshold

of productive forces

and relations

of production

if A, boomers don't know how to use of productive forces and relations of production,

if A, boomers don't know how to use the technology,

and B, are not culturally adapted to it meaningfully.

And then there's another feature of boomers is that they are their imagination is very

limited in terms of like they're not able

to actually understand the threshold

of different affectivities,

psychological states, emotions

and ways of playing with signifiers

that younger people are.

Gen A had...

How do you explain to a seven-year-old man,

Tung-Tung-Tung-Sah-Hore?

Like, how do you fucking explain it?

Like, you can't.

It's clearly somewhat meaningful.

And it does kind of mean something.

But it's like,

what it really means

is that there's this level of a dynamic range of being able

to impart and communicate affectivities,

psychological states, and signifiers without having to actually explain yourself.

That's kind of the point.

Whereas boomers think that there's a narrative, there's a specific form of narrative structure attached to everything meaningful.

Like for them, you can't just show them a picture of John Pork and expect them to be like to have a reaction.

For them, there has to be a specific form of intentionality behind the communication

of media for it to be meaningful.

And they're stuck within a very

fixed world

in terms of like their range of

sensibility.

And that's why they,

that's why they are no longer able to impart fully, at least, in its full dimension,

the master signifier underlying our entire matrix of meaningfulness, right?

So, of course, no wonder there's all these problems of people adopting different subcultures and psychosis and so on.

And the breakdown of the family, the main force of the breakdown of the family today, in addition to the economic realities, of course, is just the fact that the familial form of socialization is breaking apart because of the internet, right?

But that doesn't mean it's no longer...

I mean, the fact, look, there is a flesh and bone aspect that's not replaceable by the internet.

But the internet's this interface on top that's not replaceable by the internet but the internet's this interface on top

that's determining the structure of how people are becoming socialized at the household level

and it doesn't mean that their fathers and mothers are no longer meaningful to them at all. It just means that, like,

um, there's a severe disruption as far as the ability to communicate meaning, right?

The maintenance of meaning.

Okay, once if this was like a useful kind... Oh, I'm not even done yet.

Fuck, I'm not even done yet.

All right.

My bad.

So, if you're looking for a book to just kind of glue everything together,

you're going to

not interpret

it the

correct way

and I know

that

you didn't

interpret

my

substack

articles

nobody even

cares about

them

it's very rare that I see

anyone truly understand what I was

trying to get at. And it's not your fault.

Absolutely not.

And you know it would make it really

easy for me to pump out books.

If someone took the helm

of the infrared ship and, like, continued to communicate

and impart this world, right? This world, this logos, the infrared logos, I would be freed up to just write the fucking book.

If I, if someone else was doing what I was fucking doing, I would have written 10, 20 books by now.

And my books would metonymically implicitly reference

this fucking streamer movement.

It'd be like,

so y'all are plugged in

with infrared, right?

So I'm going to write this shit.

You'll fucking understand it.

But because I'm the fucking guy

who's doing this shit,

for me to do this and simultaneously write a fucking book is really fucking hard.

Because I can't take for granted that somebody's communicating this cosmos the right way.

That somebody is imparting upon you a specific

semblance of a new signifier or logos.

Like, I have to be at the helm of the ship

steering it, and every time I write,

I have to get off of the helm

and retreat into the captain's quarters

but lo and behold

the fucking, it's a rocky and steady journey

I have to fucking run back up, right?

So

you need to understand, I mean, beyond, I mean, on top of the fact that I, you know, I have to do, I'm chairman of the party, but the main and fundamental reason why I've kind of become a little blackpilled about the written medium is this.

But I'm still going to do it. It's going to be a Herculean task to do this shit. I'm still going to

fucking do it. Okay. But I guess I would say like i don't want you guys to

ignore that there's that this book is

probably more important than the actual book i'm going to fucking write, to be honest.

The book that I'm going to write has the potential to be misinterpreted in millions of different ways.

This is the only context that establishes the closest

level of clarity to meaning that

we have.

Which,

infrared's been lacking on the multimedia

front, but look what we have

now, the party. That's the final

bit that I wanted to get to.

None of this works, the logos.

The logos cannot come to fruition and truly become a new signifier without activity without some fucking without a way in the real world of changing reality in some way and this is what the party's doing and it's like that's how we're going to get to the point where eventually you're not going to need me

and i will not have been successful all of this hinges upon the success of all of this hinges upon that we get to a point where the logos of this whole fucking movement acquires systemic redundancy and the torch of Haas can be passed

not just to you, to dozens of fucking people

who fucking get it.

You understand?

Like, this is not a personal vanity project for me.

I don't attribute the meaning and the sign behind all of this to some extraordinary

and exceptional special quality of my person. I am very desperately trying to communicate

a something.

And if I, if we don't ever get to the point where that something isn't seized by you without me and you're able to actually understand what it fucking is without me,

I will have failed my whole fucking life school.

All of this fucking depends

upon this

outliving me.

Because, in all likelihood,

let's be honest,

the story of Haas is not a story of some guy

it's like you know how fucking stupid that we imagine

I made a TikTok of my life story like when all

a sudden done it's like he started

out uh you know

he was in high school reading marks and and then he went to law school, he got

insomnia, he became a streamer, and it was just an upward path from there, and then he became

the president. Like, that's not how this shit's going to go. Okay?

It's going to get to a point where I'm going to either be fucking killed or I'm going to be in jail or who fucking knows.

And if by that point had I not fucking put this fucking message in a bottle and sent it

away from me, I will have fucking

failed, right?

Listen, look, if I

make it, if I make it,

I will have been incredibly fucking lucky.

But let's break it down, ladies and

gentlemen. I'm saying this rationally. I'm saying this rationally. let's break it down, ladies and gentlemen. I'm saying this rationally.

I'm saying this rationally. Let's break it fucking down. They, the first generation of this movement,

me specifically, the first gen of this movement, first gen leaders of this movement, first-gen leaders of this movement,

the probability of survival very fucking low.

They're going to take us out.

When we get to the point of actually

really getting on the radar of things,

they're just going to take us out.

First gen is not going to fucking make it.

Are you fucking crazy?

First gen leadership. You think first gen leadership

is going to make it past the finish line?

Inshallah, I fucking hope.

Am I hinging all my bets on that? No.

I'm hinging on

that we can pass the baton

to the fucking people

who can make it,

you know,

in the future, right?

This might take a fucking generation,

by the way.

Right?

But it's like the people on the front line, the first ones,

we're testing the fucking waters. That's what we're doing right now. We're testing how far we can

fucking go before they start, you know, how far can we fucking go? Right? We're not meant to be the ones that make it

past the finish line. That's my pessimistic view. Maybe I'm wrong. None of this story for me

involves a delusion that I will one day be like Xi Jinping and preside over some peaceful, prosperous country or some shit.

I'll tell you that much.

Best I could hope for.

Best I could fucking hope for. Like for. Best I could fucking hope for.

Like the absolute best I can fucking hope for

is that I make it past the finish line

as a deeply traumatized, wounded veteran of a war

and retire with honorifics and as an old man and just watch this thing,

you know, win and be in power or some shit, right?

Lennon and Mao survived.

No, they fucking didn't, okay?

Lenin did not survive.

That's the thing.

He just didn't.

A few years after the revolution, he's gone, okay?

And then Mao, you're right, he's gone. Okay? And then Mao,

you're right, he survived

in some sense.

He didn't see China

proper today, China. He didn't

live to see that. So in some

sense, he didn't. But

maybe I'm wrong, by the way.

You know, by the way, I'm not saying this is dead set in stone.

Orvo, what's up?

I'm not saying this is set in stone.

I'm not claiming it's set in stone.

I could very well be wrong.

I could very well make it past the finish line. I could very well make it past the finish line.

I could very well make it to that point.

I'm just saying, if we were wise, we would take the precaution

and acknowledge there's a possibility that the first-gen leadership,

there's a high probability that we will be neutralized.

If you're going up against Skynet, just don't take it personally.

Think of that you're going up, this is a, like you're going up against Skynet, they're going to fucking take you take you out bro they're going to take out the first line

of defense it's meant to

happen that way

you have to plan in anticipation of that

God and hope we're going to be wrong

but you still have to fucking prepare

for it is what I'm trying to say.

Can you guys, okay, can you, beyond, I know some people,

some of you are worried and stuff, just at least,

ones if you can just pick up what I'm putting down right now with,

with this, okay?

Can you at least appreciate that this movement is bigger than any one individual?

Please ones, if you can just fucking acknowledge that.

Like, this is not a vanity project for me or anyone.

Like, this is a message that I want to outlive all of us.

It's so much more important and meaningful than one person. This is a message that I want to outlive all of us.

It's so much more important and meaningful than one person.

Can we at least say like that?

Like, I know we joke about being a cult and shit,

but like, how many of you are on the same fucking page that there's something fucking bigger here?

Very, very fucking important, important right this is a very unique articulation of revolutionary consciousness and world history right that deserves to be

developed more and it's a line of inquiry that deserves to be developed more. And it's a line of inquiry that deserves to be furthered.

It's a movement, right?

And, uh, Vaccaro, what's up, bro?

The reason I'm giving this lecture to you isn't because I'm throwing myself a fucking pity party.

It's because I want you to understand that this is more serious.

That this message is more serious. And, uh, you know,

it's a logos. And it's not going to be able to be complete in one book.

Even if I complete 10 books, it's still not going to be enough.

To comprehend logos, we need a new medium of communication that has system redundancy that

is more all-encompassing

and comprehensive.

Humble,

what's up?

The only Adam, the thing

is that

anyone can, right and uh when we get to that point um all of all of this comes from the cultivation and development of signs that's it okay for example

when you see the sign of hasbala that's a fucking signifier when you see their logo it's a

signifier it fucking means something, right?

I'm not saying we're going to be like them. They're a designated terrorist organization.

I'm not saying that, but we need to get to a point where this shit means something, right?

Infrared fucking means something. It communicates an entire fucking world. It's like an, it has that meaningfulness. And that's the only thing more revolutionary than a revolution itself.

What's more revolutionary than a revolution itself is the thing around which the process revolves that my friends is logos like hasbullah is revolutionary by being there.

That's it.

They're there?

The fucking world changes in a revolutionary way around them.

They have something.

They've attained some logos.

In their case, Khomeini's Shia kind of Hussein, right?

But they don't have to larp revolution. They don't even have to talk about revolution.

They have discovered the very thing around which processes revolve. Do you understand?

Like to attain the sun is to attain the center around which the celestial bodies revolve you understand ones if you fucking get that

the fucking sign that's the word that's the logos that the sign. That's what it fucking is. The thing around which everything fucking revolves. And if you attain it, you attain it, you will be effortlessly revolutionary. Effortlessly revolutionary effortlessly revolutionary

okay y'allah

I'm fucking tired

I'm beat I'm sure you are too

we're fucking wrapping it up there I'm fucking tired. I'm beat. I'm sure you are too.

We're fucking wrapping it up there.

All right.

I thought we would do some TikTok today.

This lecture took a little longer than I thought it wouldn't.

Debate.

Okay, one guy wants to debate.

Fine.

Are you in VC? Who's this fucking guy that wants to debate fine where are you in vc who's this fucking guy who's this

fucking guy who wants to debate literally what do you want what do you fucking want okay

while we're waiting for him see me where by the i wanted to show you one last thing

before we're done

I couldn't

it's more Reddit I'm sorry but

I just couldn't believe it

this is real.

This is a real thing.

Let me find it.

Let me zoom in more.

I'm about to be 30 years old and I'm just kind of baffled.

The CCP is the Nazi party.

Anyone who says otherwise is either lying or misinformed. So let me say this, ACP, we will not tolerate

you. We will not let you divide the working class. We will not let you separate the workers of the

world. Communism is international and intersectional always will be.

The only reason you exist is because the current regime is falling and you are their last chance to retain fascist power.

You're not socialist, you'll never be socialist.

Not that he means nothing other than means the great separation between the working class.

But all of us, the workers of the world,

shall unite always with dignity and always with respect.

Anything else is inhumane will not tolerate Nazis infiltrating our spaces we represent our workers.

Imagine Haas reading this and reacting to it.

That's kind of the point we're at. Like'm about to be 30 man like imagine showing this to a 30 year old man like me who's just like imagine like showing this to me like what do you want me to say uh but this is their way of create This is their logos.

Honestly,

they're creating this kind of

narrative structure in their head.

There's a song playing in the guy's head

when he's typing this.

There's a specific scene

that's being conjured in his imagination, like

a movie. And he's like,

he feels this is very brave.

This is very bold. This is very

beautiful.

We're all in this together.

Like he's just like there's this vibe

that he's here.

You know, I see these things.

That's why I cringe so hard.

Because I see the type, the little

fucking worlds people live in. I fucking see it.

Always.

I think this is someone who lives in Europe,

who lives in Belgium or something,

and is very upset.

I don't know, like they're saying we're not internationalist.

Okay, well, clearly not talking about our stance on Iran. They must talk about, let's break down all the barriers. Okay. So you're in an irrelevant, shitty European country. Of course you want to break down the barriers. You want to enjoy the same relevancy that an American

communist has, but you live in a shitty,

retarded small country that no one fucking cares about Belgium.

And so internationalism for you is an opportunity

to just grift off of

countries that actually

fucking have more than 20 people in them.

All right?

Don't know what they could possibly mean.

Nationality means nothing

then to separate, okay.

All of us workers shall unite.

I think they're just kind of giving a speech in their head, and they find it beautiful, and it's kind of like an autistic larp.

You only exist because the current regime is falling

and you are their last chance to retain fascist power.

This is a psychotic episode.

You think...

First of all, you think ACP

is the regime's last chance to...

Okay, so they've exhausted every chance to stay in power.

And the last one is the American Communist Party.

I mean, what should I say? What am I supposed to say?

It's actually like,

top common is them calling us feds.

Okay.

But you know why they call us feds?

Because feds are associated with the supreme logos around which society is for.

So the people say all of society is for, you know, the specific system we have

is maintained by the feds in their view, right? When they call us feds, they're acknowledging that we

have the same level of like versatility and dynamism and power really with respect to the determination

of reality that that they think feds do they see us as this allpervasive source of power and authority

and we're

operating beyond the visible spectrum

like the you know how the CIA is

regarded as like the CIA is operating

behind the scenes manipulating

and manufacturing reality because

they're beyond any specific appearance or phenomenal form. Well, they see us as the same way. They see us as, like, shadowy thing beyond the visible spectrum that is like operating at a register above mere lower level forms of consciousness, mere images, mere, you know, discourses, mere individual psychologies. We're operating at a level above.

And you know what?

We are, bitch.

We're not the CIA.

We're not the FBI.

We're the fucking IGG, bitch.

We are

above the fucking CIA.

We're above the fucking FBI.

We are above the fucking intelligence agencies. We're above the fucking FBI. We are above the fucking intelligence agencies.

We are above everything, bitch.

We're the fucking party of God, bitch.

We are fucking in...

We are directly in communion with heaven, bitch.

We are above.

We are the fucking angelic.

We talk to angels, bitch.

We're getting ordered by the angels.

We are the party of God.

We get the orders directly from the angels, directly from heaven to communicate heaven's will.

Yes, we operate at a register.

Far above!

Far above your pissant.

Naive fucking individual consciousness.

You know, you just walk every day.

Woo, woo, woo, woo.

I'm just a naive little retard.

And I just... We don't fucking walk through this world blind, bitch!

We see all the fuck.

We see shit.

Even CIA fucks can't see.

We see them.

We are the all-seeing eye, bitch.

I am the fucking 300 300 degree freemason bitch

we are the fucking conspiracy

we control the discourse we are on top bitch

pussy

this type of shit is above everything bitch Pussy.

This type of shit is above everything, bitch.

This type of shit has ascended beyond

anything, any intelligence agency

can fucking be worth and do. because nothing is more powerful than a

fucking symbol think about this what separates a cult from something that actually fucking matters

right a symbol fucking anyone can anyone can wear a Che Guevar a t-shirt.

You don't have to be part of any organization.

It means something.

System redundancy.

The Christian Cross.

System redundancy.

You don't have to be part of a specific

anything for that to fucking mean something.

Right?

That's what we're fucking building

that's what this shit is

that's above

everything

doz are you

what is you what is you gonna take for you, Dawes?

There's footage of me firing rocket propelled grenades.

There's footage of me firing machine guns.

There's footage of me in fucking war zones.

What is it going to fucking take for you to understand?

Oh, because you're sitting in front of a camera talking the most instantaneous medium of communication in the 21st century possible.

That somehow means this is all fake.

Like, even if you're going off such a superficial appraisal of the

meaningfulness of the media that you're being, that you're consuming, that I'm in,

bitch, don't, don't say I'm a fucking sitting in my room yelling.

There's footage of me.

You just go on my Instagram, look at the shit that I've been up to.

There's footage of me doing crazy ass shit.

What the fuck are you talking about?

He's the duck guy.

You're not saying anything meaningful right now.

Who the fuck is the duck guy?

TikTok debates.

Oh, it's Russia Defender.

No, it's not.

Is it Russia defender?

No, it's fucking not.

He said I talked to him on the phone. What the fuck are you talking about?

My bro is in your club.

Can we unbanned him?

Holy fuck, I'm literally so hungry.

Holy shit.

Just fucking unban him. What the fuck? Why is everybody messaging me the same shit? Okay, fucking unband this guy.

I'm literally starving.

I'm fucking so hungry.

I'm about to fucking die. Just see it on stream.

Yeah, if only it was so simple.

I'm trying to fucking lose weight and shit too.

Holy fuck.

Jesus Christ. Do we have any... Do we have any fucking mods that are active right now who can unbann this guy?

Is there any?

Um... You know, You know, What are we looking at, guys? Is he unband? is he unband I don't think he's banned I don't think he's banned.

Is somebody asked Sungross? Can somebody tag Sungross? Somebody tags Sengrofts?

I'm literally so hungry.

Holy fuck. Thank you. You know, Boss Dawes. Holy fuck, I have to do it myself.

Holy shit.

I don't even know how to fucking do that.

Uh... uh okay i have to find banned.

Nope, no bands.

Nope, there's nobody of that name who's banned.

Nobody's banned who's named boss.

Try it again.

Doss, boss.

Nobody's fucking banned by that name. Links are all expired.

Somebody give them a fucking invite. You know, Why the fuck is Jackson active right now?

All right,

you guys are fucking time-waster.

Tell Jackson to get in V-C right now.

Tell Jackson to get in show queue right now.

Tell him. You know, Yo! Yo!

Yo! Yo! Yo Yo You

Where the fuck are you?

Is there anyone in here?

It's, we're alive, bro

You're on a live stream?

Yes.

Really?

Yes. On kick.

Really?

Yes.

Listen.

This place is so cool.

Where?

I'm going to show you on stream.

It's okay, yeah.

We're in the Guizhou province of China, but right now

sorry

I'll show you

hold on I'm gonna

I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna show these people

the discord

I thought you were live on kick

I am

Are you on?

Can they see me?

Yes, I just showed the window

All right, they can see me?

Yeah.

All right.

Uh, how do I, how do I flip my, oh, here. Can you see?

Yeah, I'm so fucking jealous.

What the fuck?

So basically, we just walked um we walked like all the way down across that

uh ridge side and we're here because well we're here for the 90th anniversary of the Long March,

91st anniversary of the Zunei conference where Mald took control effectively.

He didn't become like secretary, but he was put into leaders.

But so we're doing a bunch of like long march themed things here yesterday uh chris and i met with um some party cadre guys born before born before the establishment of the PRC, and he was a veteran of the PLA.

We met with several of these cadre committee people for the Guiziao and zuni uh local parties and you know we met them as

it was an honor for us to meet them but they were so honored that we were there as members and

leadership of the american communist party and they they were really blown away by everything that, you know,

we've been doing and we talked a little bit about that,

and they told us a lot of stories.

But right now we're here in the Guizhou province and the rural region.

We drove a few hours out here.

And basically, all along, there's like rural communities out here, rural villages.

And today everyone knows like the bridges that China builds the tunnels.

We're about to see later today we're going to be at the world's largest bridge that went super

viral earlier this year upon its completion.

And but we're kind of seeing the things that inspired that.

So I'll just say as the last point before we get in the car,

the,

what we're looking at right now is all along these mountainsides,

there's a bunch of rural villages. And before the revolution, they had nothing.

They had no water. It was like they had prolonged droughts and whatnot. They couldn't even produce

rice here. They had no livestock. They had nothing. And a local party chairman got elected to serve this county and all the villages. And he got elected on the promise of bringing water and electricity and roads to the community. And he and his party cadre,

they had like no

knowledge of how to do any of this stuff.

And they went

and basically along the cliff sides,

along three cliff sides,

three mountain ranges,

and all this dense forest terrain. They built a nine

kilometer, four and a half mile long water canal to supply water to thousands of people here. And now

they produce rice, livestock, everything.

China has interconnected them with all these massive bridges.

And the guy who let this effort,

he is 91 years old. He's been awarded the July 1st medal, which is the equivalent of like the Presidential Medal of Freedom Award. And we're actually going to go meet him in a little bit. And he's the one, the secretary of the party that led this effort when he was elected in

1958, he was in his 20s.

It took them 39 years to build this.

They built it with pickaxes. They had

no machinery. They're along cliffside

hanging by ropes. It's incredible.

How spiritual is this?

This is a pilgrimage, by the way.

I could tell.

I can tell you're in good spirits because this is a spiritual journey.

I'm not even kidding.

China has always been extremely spiritual for me when I was there.

And I can't imagine being here.

Being there right now.

Yeah.

I'll tell you, Chris.

Where this is this? I'm live. Chris, don't say bad words

he's live

We're live, Chris, no bad words

No bad words

Here we are here, we're struggling

All he's the has said is this spiritual

pilgrimage. This is a pilgrimage. It's a red pilgrimage. It's a red pilgrimage.

We're coming to see all of the heroic deeds

of ordinary Chinese people, not only of the leadership, which

sacrifice so much, but ordinary people who we don't know their names, we don't commemorate them with pictures and banners, they're here. They do all the work. They do all the work. The roads, the infrastructure. You can't imagine the things we're seeing here. They built in a whole canal for 40 years for like

a village of 100 people. I mean,

it's unbelievable. During the Great League Forward, by

the way.

Yeah. Yeah, yeah. And afterwards, even into

the Nazis, people are just with hand tools

just doing work. It's amazing.

Phenomenal.

Phenomenal.

I'm more and more I'm impressed every time I come to China and I lived here, as you know, for two years.

I'm impressed by the spirit, the tenacity, the resilience, the discipline, and the love of country and of people that ordinary Chinese people have for one another.

It's absolutely beyond words. It's beyond words.

Allah-u-Aqbar.

That's it.

Don't this, sir?

Yes, sure.

Thank you.

And Chris is making the journey on,

uh,

on crutches.

I think we're good to go if you guys already.

He's still injured.

Oh, okay.

Okay.

Okay.

He's still injured?

Um,

he's on crutches, yeah.

Oh, my God.

And the crazy thing about this all is that, well, yesterday when we met the party cadre, one of the guys was born in 1948 in Zunyi, which is like the epicenter

of the long march,

because it changed the whole trajectory

from Soviet influence

conventional warfare with Bogu

and Otto Braun to the guerrilla warfare

approach led by Mao.

They were telling us stories about how before

Chris asked them like, what was it like before the

revolution? And all these people

were there born before

the revolution and they said, you know, it's like

talking about the landlords, the brutal landlords and whatnot. You know, it's like, you know, talking about the landlords, the brutal landlords and whatnot.

You don't have to explain to anyone what a furry is.

Did you?

They were very, very, very, the happiest I saw them was when we said well we didn't say it but they told us to say it

our friends here they're like you know tell them we represent and they were you know they were shocked

they were in love with the fact that we came from american Communist Party but

have you told them

about the problems we face

with other leftists

or no it's just negativity

they don't even understand

like this

like transgender's

and stuff

and

well they don't

but we're

they don't

we're being told

that over there

that's all they

that that we're fascists

because we don't care

either

and then I don't know

you know

we don't we don't we don't care either. And then I don't know, you know.

We don't care either. But we're constantly being told we're not the real communists.

So I was wondering if you're talking to the real communists, what do they think of this?

Reditors and stuff.

Well, they don't know what any of that is

They don't

I'm just telling you they don't know what any of that is

It's like uh

what do you mean they don't know about the trans trans uh stuff

i thought all i'm saying is like i thought everyone knew about it

because i thought all communists knew about it and it's all about what communism is, you know?

I thought it was like a really important aspect of this whole thing.

Well, you know, when we go meet the 91-year-old party, local party chairman Huang Da Fa, who built this canal over 40 years, I'll be sure to ask him about the furries.

Who cares about canals?

What about the pride parades?

Yeah.

Right?

Because ACP does some stuff, but none of that matters.

So all that matters is, is right or what's going on

oh you got a burger who i thought i can you not be nasty what's what's going on he doesn't care who's he going to impress he's

already got i've already got nelly he's already got appearing in all my wards the best girlfriend ever thank you guys

hi Nellie

what's up

are you

coming to Russian

uh yes

but I...

He eventually will one day again.

One day we're going to see him again.

I can't reveal the dates on public because we're lying...

We'll see him again one day.

Listen, this place is great.

This trip is amazing

and

I'm

you're good you're good

our friends that

all I'll say is we're about to go

somewhere else so I'm going to leave you but

yeah um

not because I have to the internet here is amazing they've got 5g plus plus

i got i gotta i gotta i gotta wrap it up listen all i got to say is that this trip i'm gonna be

talking more about it, but we're loved

here, we have good friends here. You're vlogging and

shit, right? Yes,

and people are going to understand

if they want to come on the same pilgrimage,

I'll explain, but you know, there's

opportunities for our party cadre to come as well.

So you're going to be able to check that out.

But anyways, I'll talk to you guys all more later.

All right.

See you later, bro.

Good shit.

Peace.

Have a good time.

All right, guys.

We are way over the stream time.

All right.

All right, y'all.

I'm fucking starving.

I'm literally going to die.

All right, y'all.

What a great stream, honestly, right?

What an unexpectedly pleasant stream.

Once if you liked the lecture a lot.

Once of you,

ones if you loved the lectures.

And, of course, the other stuff was great as well. Okay, good. Everyone loved it. Wonderful. All right, y'all, I'll see you

Thursday when I have more energy. Bye-bye. See you.