π΄ RED NEWS | WW3 STARTING!!!!! | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES
2025-01-07T02:21:55+00:00
Packing up my things for the summer
Lying on my bed, it's a bummer.
Cause I didn't call when I got your number, but I
Slipping on my dress in soft filters Everybody said you're a killer But I couldn't stop the way I was feeling the day your record dropped The day I saw you wide
You wanna stand the dress of your
You are
Build my dreams and forget
Cause you
Yeah.
It's a little too tight then.
Span for a while
So slower.
All the ways you've been living, but you just couldn't stop this.
Killer.
So you
I see it, I want it, I cook it, and that's in the brando pirates whipping.
Let's stay man started clicking, no boo, I'm waitress tipping.
But do come and take this dickin'.
Code Dean, that's what I'm sippin'.
My need, that's what I'm missing.
Look, I'm a London scammer.
I see it, I want it, I click it.
Nights in the brando, pirates whipping.
Let's take a man started clicking.
No boo, I'm waitress tippin'.
But do come and take this dickin'.
Codeine, that's what I'm sipping.
My need, that's what I'm missing.
Swing me a monzo, your dozens.
Either way, we're making thousands.
I made so much money, I might have to get an account.
I made streets, fuck up the holders, credit.
I said, Do you really wanna take that risk?
Look, I make more money than chips and shit.
I bought fools off the dark web, but I got bumped, that shit was dead.
Didn't wanna take that L, so I took out credit instead.
Click 80 package just from next.
Of course, yeah, just got black listed.
So I sent it to my girls instead.
Look, I'm a London scammer.
I see it, I want it, I click it.
Now it's in the Brando Pirates whipping.
Let's stay a man started clicking.
No boo, I'm waitress tippin'.
But D, come and take this dick in.
Codeine, that's what I'm sippin'.
Money, that's what I'm missing.
Look, I'm a London scammer.
I see it, I want it, I cook it.
Nights in the brando, pirates whippin'.
Let's stay man started clicking.
No boo, I'm waitress tippin'.
But do come and take this dickin'.
Codeine, that's what I'm sippin'.
Money, that's what I'm missing.
Look, I was chasing a bag, more time now, I'm chasing this suitcase.
Best man kicking like Blueface court case.
Got that shit on the seventh.
Be a gang really on jewels like seven.
I fully gassed up, no seven, eleven.
Look, niggas mad that I'm making more than their parents.
I'm a drawdown ones, I'm taking your missus.
Run out of luck, cause she liking my pictures.
These hot boys just chat like bitches.
These hot boys just move like girls.
It was me and K1 was up in the T Wood scales.
It was me and K1 and the T Wood scales.
Look, I'm a London scammer.
I see it, I want it, I click it.
Now it's in the brando pirates whipping.
Let's stay man started clicking.
No boo, I'm waitress tippin'.
But do come and take this ticking.
Codeine, that's what I'm sippin'.
Money, that's what I'm missing.
Look, I'm a London scammer.
I see it, I want it, I quick it.
Now it's in the bando pirates whipping.
Let's stay and start clicking.
No boo, I'm waitress tipping.
But do come and take this dickin'.
Codeine, that's what I'm sippin'.
Money, that's what I'm missing.
Look.
I see it, I want it, I click it Nats in the bundle, parrots whipping
Patting your bitch 'cause she liking my pictures loose.
Yeah.
Um
Come on, my skill.
Okay.
Welcome, everyone.
Finally, it took you long enough.
Much, yeah, muted, muted.
We know.
Took you long enough, guys.
Um, we're here now.
Thank no thanks to you.
Uh, well, thanks to you.
I don't know how to put it.
You guys were very late, but I very generously started the stream before 11:30 anyway, even though you did not make the goal.
Um, but that's okay, it's a new year.
We have time for new year's resolutions to be implemented, and um.
And uh, everything's gonna go fine.
So, guys, I want to talk about a lot of topics today, some of which I wasn't able to because I was in Russia, others that are more recent, and um, they revolve around Elon Musk and his influence in global politics, also some stuff about the war, the SMO, which is something I did not I swore to just not talk about until it was won because of how long it's dragging on.
But there are actually some new developments on that front.
Um, I'm noticing something, and I don't want to jinx it.
Now, with respect to discourse surrounding the ACP and our party, I am starting to notice a huge, well, decline in it.
I'm starting, and I'm talking about in the past week or two, but remember in internet years, that's actually a really, really long time.
I think our enemies made a final desperate push in December for something really big, and then nothing materialized, and nothing ended up coming out of it.
And now it's just a ghost town, and they just have nothing because people are just getting sick and tired of the constant whining and bitching about the ACP.
And meanwhile, I feel like everyone is becoming just much more shocked by the development of the right, you know, what Dugan calls the woke right, or, you know, what we could see as the tech right, the rise of Elon Musk, the incoming inauguration of Trump.
I think people don't, the energy is not really there anymore to slant to play the game like, oh, you guys aren't the real communists, you guys are fascists in disguise, because of how overwhelming the broader reality and climate of politics is becoming.
And uh, okay, there's still a lot of talk on TikTok.
Well, I'm just going off of X from what I'm seeing.
And I think that people are rapidly awakening to the fact that we do
Look, I want everyone to understand that I try to be a realistic person.
I try not to be a bullshitter.
I try not to be somebody who just engages in wishful thinking.
I try to be as objective as I can.
And in that capacity, being as objective as I possibly can, I think it's very, very fair to say that right now we actually represent the vanguard and the cutting edge of what everyone can clearly see is lining up and shaping to be the future of left-wing politics in America.
If you didn't know any better, you'd think that Bernie Sanders and Jank Uyger and all of these left personalities are just straight up copying everything we're saying and they are following our lead at this point.
Now, I'm not going to pretend that I think Bernie Sanders knows who we are.
I'm not saying that.
I'm just saying we were there first and now everyone is treading ground that we had a, you know, we had already covered years ago, right?
So, yes, absolutely.
That puts us in a position of the cutting edge.
And that is not something we should relinquish.
That's not something we should give away easily.
That's not something that we should forget.
And practically, what does that translate into?
Well, it translates into understanding that you guys now, in January, where things are starting to die down, need to be twice as aggressive as you were being in the lead up.
Now is not the time to slow down like everyone else is slowing down.
Now is the time to double down and increase the level of aggression, increase the militancy.
I'm talking about online.
Nobody can take what I'm saying.
From its meaning, you guys need to go for the jugular now and push, push, push, push, push.
Now is not the time to retreat.
Wow, William Jennings with the 18.
Appreciate you, brother.
For some strange reason.
Over the past months or month, this Southern populist Democrat has been a very prominent benefactor of the infrared webcast.
And um I'm not sure what it means.
Can we do it without the racism this time?
I think that's the question.
Can we do it without the racism this time?
But it's true.
In any case, um, no, uh, and I actually I'm gonna make a lot of I'm gonna I'm gonna actually
Elaborate on that, what I just said.
Because I feel like a lot of people need to hear this.
A lot of people in our movement need to hear this in general.
And I want to tell you guys about what direction things are going in, what direction we need to be going in, and controversy surrounding Jackson and all of that kind of stuff, right?
Should you reply, guy?
Yes, all major influencers, you guys need to be in the replies.
You need to be in Elon Musk's replies, Trump's replies, you name it.
Lionel, appreciate you.
You guys need to be absolutely doubling down when it comes to social media as aggressively as you possibly can.
You need to absolutely be planting our flag everywhere.
ACP, ACP, ACP, American Communist Party, American Communist Party.
By the way, I'm telling you this as Haas from Infrared, as an influencer.
Okay, imagine I wasn't even in the party, right?
I'm still giving you the same order, right?
This is not an official order.
For the party, it's an order to infrared, okay?
So to the guerrilla army, right?
The same one that we've had for years and years and years.
Will I be in the replies?
Well, I've made it a a habit.
To tweet only once a day.
So I'm I tend to be very careful about what I tweet.
Now, uh, there's been questions okay, Banana, frankly, banana has been asking many questions about MAGA communism.
And I would also like to issue some clarity on that.
Although we've absolutely been vindicated when it comes to MAGA communism.
It is actually not the time right now to revive that hashtag and revive it.
And I'll tell you exactly why: because MAGA is now superfluous.
Trump won.
MAGA communism doesn't make any sense anymore, okay?
In terms of a hashtag to revive.
Like, it makes sense in terms of where it was historically and how that was necessary.
But the meme does not need to be relitigated again because the conflict is no longer about MAGA between MAGA and non-MAGA.
Now the conflict is within MAGA, right?
So it suffices really.
To just be a post-MAGA communist.
I mean, a communist who is post-MAGA.
That's what I mean to say.
We don't need to litigate the battle between MAGA versus non-MAGA, because now MAGA is the only game in town.
So, in terms of the meme warfare, that is not the direction I think we need to be going in.
I think we rather need to be going in the direction which we have been setting the trend for and the precedent for of really fleshing out and making communism in general on a fresh, clean, new basis.
It's taking for granted the victory of MAGA.
It's a post-MAGA thing, right?
Yeah, communists in the age of MAGA.
That's where we need to be going.
And that's.
That is on the one hand taking for granted the surrealism of MAGA, the psychedelic Trumpism that Dugan talks about.
By the way, my Dugan video is finished, it's edited, and it's going to be dropping possibly tomorrow.
Um, so look forward to that.
It's a very interesting discussion we had.
So, uh look, I've been I'm kind of all over the place right now.
There's a lot I want to talk about last stream.
I really elaborated and I talked about the revolutionary dynasty and the Daola thing, right?
The problem with making that a popular meme is it's incredibly esoteric, it's incredibly fringe, and as some of you have pointed out, it is foreign.
I know it's foreign, it's supposed to be foreign, it's oriental, it's exotic.
But that is not obviously something that overnight is going to be popular with the masses.
It's not going to be a viral meme.
It is more a way of
Me communicating to you guys
That I want you to sharpen your intellect.
I want you guys to start reading up more on theory.
I want you to start enriching your comprehension of what Marxism-Leninism is beyond just memes, beyond just that.
I want you to read books.
I want you to be literate.
I want you to read literature.
So, that is a kind of esoteric meme that is for us and our community.
The revolutionary dynasty thing.
The Revolutionary Dynasty meme is not a meme for the general public.
It is a meme for militants.
A meme for militants, a meme for people who understand that what they're fighting for is not just something that popped up in the past 100 or 150 years, but spans the entirety of world history.
It is ontological in its significance.
It is absolutely something that has the might and the breadth of all the world's major religions and traditions and civilizations.
And that is how deep it goes, right?
And that is an idea that synthesizes.
And this is really my book, which I keep talking about because I don't even have time to work on it anymore, which is a big problem.
And I need to find a solution to that.
I really need time to finish that book.
I haven't had it.
I haven't had that time at all.
I have not been particularly.
Well I haven't really ev been able to settle in even since I got back from Russia, you know.
As soon as I got back from Russia, it's immediate business to attend to and deal with.
So for the party, I mean.
So, um
I'm going to have to find a solution to that, which is one of my goals this year: I need to find a way to actually be able to finish that book and have the time to do that.
But in any case, the Daola thing and the Revolutionary Dynasty thing, I think, is the latest synthesis within Infrared, which I, it's a direction I'd like us to move in on a literary, on an intellectual level, and on a theoretical level, right?
Because it's something that is synthesizing.
You know, Marxism-Leninism, the materialist dialectic with, um.
With a specific understanding.
of Michael Hudson's understanding of the Bronze Age.
cycles of debt forgiveness, right?
And the relationship between those cycles and the consolidation of power and political authority and revolutions.
So these are all things that are being combined and synthesized.
And that's really what it's about.
Remember, the dynastic cycle begins with debt forgiveness, land redistribution, and the emancipation of slaves, right?
That's what begins the dynastic cycle.
So that is a very important thing to keep in mind when it comes to the breadth and significance of that meme.
It's very powerful, and there's a lot bundled into it.
Um
And I want that to activate creativity, and I want to see more.
More of that from you guys.
But for now, let's just shelve that for one second.
And let me talk about the direction I think we need to be heading in going into 2025.
And this is in relation also to some of Jackson's, some of the complaining and the controversy about Jackson's tweets.
In general, I find myself yet again having to talk about Jackson's tweets.
So let me be absolutely clear about something.
I don't want to spoil my discussion with Dugan, but I actually feel like it's kind of very pertinent to this topic and to this subject.
How should I put this?
We are heading in a dark direction as a society.
as world history in general.
And that's not necessarily a bad thing.
And when I say dark, I mean increasingly out of the hegemony of the prevailing institutions.
And their ability to regulate our imagination and our vibes and our intuitions and so on and so on.
And
I think that people are going to start realizing the dark age we're entering into is not.
I mean, I've said this before.
I hate to say it again.
But.
A lot of people are not going to make it into this new age we're entering into.
I'm sorry to tell you, you're just not going to make it.
I'm sure the gorillas are going to make it.
You guys will make it.
But the people let's just say people who are hung up about Jackson's tweets.
I'm not.
It's not about us wanting to go to war with you.
I don't want to go to war with you.
I don't want to battle you.
I don't want to fight you.
You're just not going to make it into this new era we're entering into.
And it suffices for me to say that that tendency.
And that sentiment is just going to be left behind.
And I'm not interested in being left behind with them.
I'm not interested in being a reactionary and fighting these changes in vain.
Okay?
Lionel, what's going on?
Was that Lionel?
I'm not interested in fighting in vain with you and screaming against the void.
I'm not interested in that.
So we're gonna keep going forward, okay?
We're not interested in edginess, we're not interested in being shocking or whatever, but I think I've noticed a pattern, you know?
Wallo, what's up?
Um, Jackson, listen, Jackson will tweet something, right?
And people will kind of panic and draw the most shocking and provocative and edgy possible conclusion from what he's saying.
I'm talking about recently.
And I don't feel like we have to entertain that.
I feel like those it's like we're the ones now having a normal one and you're freaking out and we don't need to dwell on that or entertain it or breathe any more attention into it.
Okay.
I think it's that simple.
I don't know if you guys know where I'm coming from.
Like, we are here being normal, and liberals are losing their minds, reading into shit, drawing conclusions that they feel are logical conclusions about the implications of the tweet.
But in reality, in terms of how social media actually works and the psychologies that are at play in social media, those logical conclusions people are drawing in terms of their interpretation aren't actually justified.
A lot of people come from academia, where everything is a fucking paper that you're writing, and everything is literal, and everything is a proposition, and everything is like meant to be scrutinized at the level of I'm going to take this to its logical conclusion in terms of this reflexive interpretation.
But that is just not how social media works.
How social media works is that, first of all, it's a matter of instant gratification.
It's instantaneous.
It's immediate.
It's not supposed to be drawn out to its logical conclusion all the time.
Especially in the case of Jackson's tweets.
Jackson is a guy who is plugged in to attention 24-7.
The attention that stays and the attention that goes in the heat of the moment.
Okay.
And what he is doing is absolutely serving the goals of our party to that end.
Now, people tend to cut me more slack because my content is different, because I don't just.
Focus on the attention that's being trafficked right now, but I tend to be more reflexive and draw out more, you know, long-term thinking and so on and so on.
But the reason that's not fair is because both are actually necessary.
You have to have both a guy like me who is more long-term and someone like Jackson who is able to tarry with the hither and tither of where attention is going and leaving.
So it's actually kind of counter, well, not counterintuitive.
It's kind of strange to say this as a dialectician.
But when it comes to Jackson's strategy on social media, you shouldn't think in a holistic way.
You shouldn't take a tweet of his and try to situate it within this like wider holistic nexus of meaning and how it's interrelated with everything else and drawing out all the possible conclusions from it.
You shouldn't actually do that because that's actually not what's happening when it comes to how national attention is being trafficked and how it is being experienced in real time.
Sleeper Cell with the 10.
Wow.
Thank you, Sleeper Cell.
Appreciate it so much.
Thank you so much.
Um
So that needs to be understood.
Um
Nobody is forcing you to read into shit, okay?
And and I I don't find it particularly helpful when people
Um
Well, we'll we'll save we'll table the discussion.
For later in a different way, but
I guess what I'm trying to say is that I think two years ago, myself, us as a community, and Jackson for that matter, were regarded as incredibly inflammatory, incredibly edgy, incredibly whatever.
And that was never a position I wanted to be in.
It was never a position I wanted to be in, nor a position that I chose to be in.
It is a position I was put in.
No thanks to my intentions or what I thought.
Was ideal, right?
But that is no longer the case now.
We haven't changed.
It's just society is changing.
The direction of world history is changing.
And these mentally ill left liberals are going to be screaming into the void and they're going to be dragged along kicking and screaming.
And I am not interested in taunting them, nor am I interested in joining them.
I'm interested in turning my back on them and walking forward into a new context of struggle and a new context.
of or of deriving
The meaning of of
What our war is and who is on the battlefield.
Okay, um, we're just gonna we're just gonna move past them.
I mean, I'm not interested in beating the dead woke horse.
That's what I'm trying to tell you.
I'm not interested in beating the dead woke horse, but at the same time, it is dead, and we do need to acknowledge that and just fucking move on.
That's what I'm trying to tell you guys.
Like, it's dead.
Move on.
It's actually dead.
No.
You don't need to fight it.
You don't need.
It's dead.
It's gone.
I'm telling you, almost overnight, it died.
It's gone.
It's no more.
Crash, what's up with the 10?
Ah, yes, thank you for reminding me.
Merry Orthodox Christmas or Merry Christmas in general.
I'm just kidding.
I have no dog in this fight.
Uh
Well if you're in Europe
If you're in America, it's gonna be in two hours.
I already did wish my Russian friends Merry Christmas.
So there's that.
Merry Christmas.
I think I will be streaming tomorrow.
I don't know.
Maybe.
Maybe.
Um, ah, that reminds me.
There's some bad news about Syria I have to break to you, but I can't show you the footage, but it's really bad.
Um.
Okay, yeah, anyway, uh yes, so look, no need to beat the dead woke horse, but it is dead and it's time to move on.
So, anyone who's still complaining about Jackson's tweets, the ship has sailed a long time ago, and I don't know what to tell you.
Young Soviet, what's going on, brother?
That ship sailed a long time ago.
It's done.
All right.
And we're here now and it's a new world we live in where that should probably be the least of your concerns.
So, uh
I want to explain something to you guys.
I haven't changed.
Okay, I'm still the same Haas during the MAGA Communism streams, during the Mecha Tanky streams.
During the streams that were before that, I'm still the same guy
I haven't changed in my outlook and how I see things.
I haven't changed at all.
I'm still the same.
Okay.
I haven't changed.
But
Um
A realization was made at a certain point that the hegemony is not dead and that there's no way to take it on.
By yourself.
And we just had to wait and bide our time and hide our strength a little bit.
Okay.
We have bid our time.
Now the time is ours.
Okay.
Now we are going to be calibrating and moving our ship in the direction
of taking on the challenges of this new post woke era.
We don't all our enemies dropped like flies more or less in terms of well, they're they're still there, but like
They have no viability anymore.
All the the environment has changed.
It's not the same one as before.
Left liberals are either losing their mind or they're converting to the right.
And here we are as the left wing who have not changed.
And that's where we are right now, right?
And I want everyone to understand that I haven't changed.
I stayed the same.
But when I became more professional, okay, which I did, I started to become more professional in my streams.
I started to take this more seriously than I did when I started out.
When I started infrared
It was very serious.
Not when I started.
When the Infrared Collective started Infrared, it was very serious.
When I first went live, it was very serious.
Okay?
Then when I started debating, it was still serious, but
Things started to get a little silly, right?
And then things, and then I started very much not taking it seriously at all.
And one of the reasons I didn't take it seriously is because
I am a disciple of Alexander Kojev and I don't believe in
I I I thought I was above everyone because not you guys, but like all the influencers and all the stupid Twitter bullshit discourse and discourse in general.
Because as a disciple and student of Kojev, I know that
The universal and homogenous state has already put an end to all discourse.
It is vain to struggle for recognition on the internet and tweet for attention.
Please recognize me.
Please.
That whole rat race of clout and wanting attention to be recognized on a subjective level was only worthy of mockery to me.
But behind that mockery wasn't an intention to torture people or even put people down, but to assert good news, which is that it's over.
The need to be recognized is over.
We don't need to find recognition on social media.
We don't need to be seen and heard subjectively anymore.
Our recognition is finally fulfilled and accomplished objectively in the universal and homogeneous state already.
And therefore the tired struggle to be recognized as a somebody, to be seen, to be heard, to have a semblance of social existence by demeaning yourself on the fucking internet and having to
Having to pretend that a bunch of strangers are your friends or can somehow fucking relate to you on a subjective level in your deepest and most intimate experiences and existence, that is all over.
There's no need for it.
Our existence is reconciled.
Our the recognition we're craving and and that we're seeking we already have it.
We already have it.
in the universal and homogeneous state.
And what is the universal and homogeneous state?
It's the fucking Communist Party.
And for me it was the Communist Party of the CP uh of the USA.
2036.
That for me was the end.
The end
And
Something that was in the future, of course.
And so mocking and scorning this stupid fake internet world where everybody's trying to fucking be something and somebody and and and pretend like people that they actually don't know on any level
somehow give a shit about them or know anything about them.
You know, all I wanted to do was just mock that and simultaneously mock people that were trying to get to me.
Like, how many fucking times on Twitter did people very viscerally, like, really try to be like, oh, you're a loser, you're you're not being recognized, Haas.
We're gonna, you're not recognized, we're all laughing at you, you're not getting the recognition.
That and the whole time, I just kept.
Very mechanically, just kept
I wouldn't budge.
I'm just like, no, this is all fake.
This is not even real.
It means nothing.
It literally means nothing at all.
And it was just kind of sad actually.
Not me.
I it's not that I felt sad.
I felt sad for others because
It's like no matter how hard I tried, nobody understood it.
Nobody got it.
They didn't get it.
And
I kept going.
And then at a certain point, I felt like I was a little crazy because I was like, I'm supposed to be psychologically affected by this.
Okay.
Being like hated by like all these thousands of people I don't even know.
Like this is supposed to make me feel a certain way.
This is supposed to do something to me.
And it just didn't.
It just fucking didn't.
You know?
Like.
This is, I'm supposed to be affected by this.
My status, my everyone thinks I'm a clown.
Everyone thinks I'm this, I'm that.
I'm supposed to care about this.
But I just fucking didn't.
And the more people expected that I would, the more s paradoxically, it did kind of because it wasn't that it affected me, it was that their expectation that it would did.
Like, I'm like, give it a fucking rest, you know.
Um
Give it a rest, it's it's vain.
You know, why do you cling so hard to something that's just not real?
But, you know, a good Hegelian would understand that that approach
Of mine was also vain.
It was also vain.
And if I really wanted to assert the real truth that I've always been struggling to communicate since the very beginning.
which is that our tired subjective struggle is over.
This is my message in the age of social media and in the age of the internet.
Our tired subjective struggle for recognition is over and has been over for a long time.
And everyone is being conned into thinking that in order to be someone and to even be fucking human and be recognized as a human being,
That you have to fucking demean your privacy by throwing it all out there for the whole fucking world to see and turn yourself into a fucking object.
And you don't need to do that.
You know, you don't need to do that because it's over, it's already over.
Um
That
That is what I was always trying to say, ironically, you know, very ironically.
That's always been the point of this when you simplify it.
I'm talking about for the age of social media that now.
We can return to the real.
But returning to the real is not the same as touching grass and just logging off.
It's also accepting the consequences of social media.
There those are irreversible consequences, there's no going back, I'm not a reactionary.
But
You know, what you're seeing with the American Communist Party right now, that was always the goal and that was always the int intention from the beginning.
Like,
American partisan, what's up?
Appreciate it.
Appreciate both.
Um
It's not that I think that there's some privacy that cannot be broadcasted to the internet.
It's not true.
Your most intimate
Existence can be uploaded to the Internet.
But what I was trying to say is that it's vain.
It's vain.
Yes, it can all be out there.
Yes, privacy is gone.
Yes, real private individuality is completely gone.
But you should rediscover what privacy is.
You should rediscover what it means.
To actually be an individual in some kind of way.
Not through
Yellowstone appreciate it.
Through a concept which
Features very prominently in the religion of Islam, actually, which is mercy.
Just show mercy, you know?
Show fucking mercy on people.
Yeah, we all know.
We all fucking know.
That somebody going to the bathroom and taking a shit that can be live streamed on the internet.
Yes, we know it's possible.
Blackpack, what's up?
Blackpack with the 10.
Thank you so much.
Like, it's very possible, and people have done it before.
You don't need to fucking prove that.
Show some fucking mercy to people.
Just because you're not seeing them, just because you don't know everything about them, doesn't mean that they don't exist.
That's the fucking point.
Just because you don't fucking see people on the fucking internet who are famous doesn't mean that they don't exist.
And that's a very powerful message.
For the tens of millions, hundreds of millions of invisible men and women in this country struggling alone, zero notifications, nobody fucking knows who they are or cares, because nobody fucking sees them on the internet and because they just aren't uploading themselves out there.
And therefore what, they're nobodies who should be stepped on and not treated with any respect?
And abandoned completely?
The difference between those two things is mercy.
It's called mercy, you know?
And there's mercy in the sense of debt forgiveness, and there's also mercy in the sense of
Acknowledging that things are real even if they aren't being experienced by you as information.
Especially by you as information now immediately.
Things you know
Things don't need to enter your immediate experience in order to be treated with respect and exist.
So
What how did I get to this topic?
Uh how did I get to this topic?
Um, I got to this topic uh because of the professional thing.
Right.
Right.
So that was why I was not professional in the beginning, because, um
Because I wanted I thought they're
I wanted there to be a way for.
It was extremely utopian in a way, but it was like.
The idea was like.
Just fucking put an end to it all.
Fucking destroy not discourse as such.
The realization of discourse is accomplished in the universal and homogeneous state, for example.
The external objectivity of a
Well, for Kojev of a form, but for me, a
A dialectical object, you know, a a history, a party.
Uh a logos, if you will.
I know that sounds crazy without being explained.
But um
So not destruction of discourse, but destruction of
Destruction of um discursive time.
Destruction of
The discursive activity that is taking place.
which is predicated on the view that the object of discourse has not yet been fulfilled.
And that's what I think should have been destroyed or wanted to destroy and set fire to completely and entirely.
And
Another thing is that um
You know
Um
I'm I'm I'm the reason I'm in a very reflective mood right now is 'cause um usually in the beginning or the end of the year, that's what you're supposed to do.
So that's why.
But um
The thing is, is that I want everyone to take a step back for a little bit.
And I want you, and some of you, not all of you, were there, but for those of you, and I know you're here, for those of you that were there in the very, very fucking beginning, okay, I'm going to tell you guys something.
Be very, and I'm going to be very, very honest about it.
From the very fucking beginning of this, okay, when there was 20 people here, when there was five people here, from the very beginning of this, okay.
Up to now, with how much has been transparent, okay?
What if I fucking told you?
Would you believe me if I told you, nothing, nothing that has happened surprised me.
None of it was a surprise.
And I've been incredibly calm
In terms of how big the heights that have been achieved are, but nothing was surprising to me.
Would you believe that?
Including Jackson's, the heights reached by Jackson.
None of it surprised me.
Nothing was surprising to me.
Literally, nothing.
I'm happy we're on track actually, and I worry sometimes
If we're not on track.
immediately to our next goal.
But I know we will reach it.
And I expect it.
And it doesn't surprise me at all.
Um
ACP doesn't surprise me.
You know, Jackson meeting Maduro doesn't surprise me.
My trips to Russia, none of it surprises me, nothing.
And where did I start out?
I started out in a fucking apartment.
Um, by myself isolated for like two two years or something.
At minimum, frankly.
Yeah, and a beater with a shitty camera and a shitty mic.
And
Within the first week of having clicked that live button, none of this that has happened has surprised me one bit.
And I've never I've never sat by myself and been like, wow, I can't believe we No, nothing surprised me.
I have been completely
Um
How should I put it?
Completely calm.
And why?
Wh why am I telling you that and what's the point?
I'm telling you that because...
There's one way to experience things which I detest.
Which is that it's like you're playing the lottery or you're playing a game.
And oh yeah, you're on a score streak and it's just higher and higher and higher.
Wow, you know?
And you're just so shocked and surprised at the new heights you're reaching and wow, I can't believe this.
And I feel like a fucking idiot.
is walking through life like that.
And and I'll never be that person.
Because you should al f you should already fucking know.
What this shit is about.
Like, you're alive, you're living.
What are you living for?
What is it all about?
You should have an idea.
That the end has already been accomplished.
You know, in some sense, this Nietzschean stuff.
Or this
Um
conventional view of what the Nietzschean stuff is that, you know, uh it's an eternal return.
Everything is just repeating itself over and over and over again and it's already happened and it will happen and so on and so on.
There is a profound truth to that.
Um
I am not impressed.
At all by
The um
Victories in battle.
By tactical victories, I'm not impressed by them.
I don't
Um asymptotically
reach the final outcome of what all this is for through the various milestones to get there.
I have what I'm impressed by
was something that I already knew and experienced when I was a fucking nobody in a beater by myself in a fucking apartment.
isolated fundamentally from all society,
which is the real sublime object of our existence.
The real
object of our aspirations,
To be recognized.
The real end, you know, which is something like what Lacan would call a new signifier.
You know, a word.
if you will, in the biblical sense of the word,
That has always been what impresses me.
And that is something eternal.
And that is something which, as long as you focus on it,
And as long as you believe in it fundamentally.
All of the changes in reality.
Between you and it that occur will not come as a surprise to you.
They won't be shocking or impressive at all to you.
If you have something that you actually believe in and have faith in, that something will never cease to be a source of fascination and beauty and and awe to you.
Whether you're a fucking beggar
on the side of the street in the pouring cold rain?
Or you're on the fucking highest mountain
In a fucking palace made of diamonds and pearls and gold.
It doesn't fucking matter.
And in this strict sense, I really am a Muslim.
You know?
It's not ver very popular thing to say in America, but
That is how I see it I really see it that way.
It doesn't matter where your station in life is.
It really doesn't matter.
That is not something impressive.
Because, for example, God is just this infinite sublime that.
The contemplation of which, the focus toward which, the veneration of
Yields infinite wealth, infinite fascination, infinite awe.
And maintaining that kind of unshakable faith.
um should should render as no surprise whatsoever, you know uh gold and diamonds and success and greatness being showered upon you.
That is just an after effect.
And of course, you don't have to think of it in terms of God.
You can be an atheist and fundamentally share understand what I'm talking about.
Instead of God, you know, going back to this thing I mentioned from Lacan about the new signifier, you can think of it as a comprehension.
Of
The fact that
the object of your aspiration and existence, within which you seek your ultimate rec recognition
Already exists in some way or in some form, right?
You know, as the um the logic.
That is um driving history forward or that has driven history forward before.
the reality of communism itself, where after all everyone is
Um
The same.
I know that's um
I know Marx and Engels are very clear.
That equality is a bourgeois notion.
Um
And that this is not what the essence of what communism is, but in some sense.
Communism is the fulfillment of r the bourgeois equality, bec not because it makes everyone the same, literally, on a physical level, or at the level of the wealth they possess, or at the level of, you know, um their skills or their even their social status in some sense.
how much they're liked or disliked by others, but
In the strict sense that
no one can claim to be recognized more than someone else in terms of what the real ends of our existence actually is.
It is a common horizon of social existence.
which we are all united within, through language itself, by the way,
Which does not know any distinctions between people.
Um
And that is the meaning of equality within
Uh communism.
So, for example, you don't have to believe in God.
You can just believe in communism.
And it's the same thing.
As long as you are not.
Deluding yourself into thinking that communism is some
Well, literal end goal, that's a eventually we're going to reach it, but we haven't reached it yet.
As long as you can comprehend communism as something like language, which is what Boris Groys wrote in the Communist Postscript, you can understand what I'm trying to say in terms of the fact that none of the things happening in actual reality or I should w what I should rather say is not the things that are happening in reality.
But the experi the immediate experiences within reality that you are having having, those should not surprise you.
If you have a fundamental comprehension
about what your relation to reality is.
But for these experiences, you have a comprehension of that relation.
In some kind of way.
And if you think what I'm saying is some kind of idealism.
Stalin is the one who made it abundantly clear.
who made it indisputably clear in his writings on Marxism and Linguistics.
Stalin did something that changed
Or uh settled the debate within Marxism once and for all, or at least within Marxism-Leninism once and for all.
Language is not a superstructure.
It's not an ideal superstructure.
And it is neither a um
It is neither a tool nor a tool.
Uh
A mere tool.
So what is language?
Language is something material, first of all.
Language
Is not defined by class division.
Or antagonism.
Language is a real integral totality of history itself, which is the fundamental foundation
upon which class struggle occurs.
So Stalin is the one who made it absolutely clear.
In his writings on Marxism and the question of linguistics,
That this is not actually idealism.
Um
That materiality itself
is structured.
In a meaningful way.
And out of that meaningfulness is where language is derived from.
And that is a profound contribution to Marxism, because instead of material reality just being this meaningless, pure flux of matter that is fundamentally blind and indifferent to humanity,
Material reality is something that has the structure of meaningfulness within it already.
So that is a very profound um
intervention within Marxism that Stalin elects to make.
That's very, very important actually.
very crucial, and very decisive.
Um
I have a few more things to touch on before we get into the Patreon QA, which I want to remind you guys we are going to be getting into today.
Tonight.
But um
Yes, okay, finally to wrap up this thing about
Um, how I started out unprofessional, then I professionalized and so on and so on.
I want to be absolutely clear about something.
Um infrared has not become formalistic.
Okay.
I've taken a professional turn.
That doesn't mean I'm impervious.
To
transformations with respect to content.
I will be fucking cold and formal and tell you to fucking stop crying and grow up.
When it comes to complaining about Jackson's tweets.
And I'll tell it to you formal.
Um formally.
I will tell you formally that we're entering a new era and um formally speaking, there's no way to formally account for it.
There's no way to formally define that era.
There's no way to formally preempt the terms and conditions under which the battles to come are going to be waged.
I will never acquiesce.
To this stale
Dead
Professional managerial formalism that is devoid of humor.
I will never fucking acquiesce to it.
Okay?
I'll clean my setup a little bit and I'll stop being extremely outrageous and inflammatory and edgy because edginess is stupid anyway.
But to be clear,
You know, I'm not gonna just
I'm not just gonna
Um how should I put it?
I'm not going to resist history itself in vain, uh in the name of being formally pure.
It's exactly what I'm trying to say.
Yeah.
So let me be absolutely clear about that.
Um
Like, yeah, I have not changed, by the way.
I haven't changed.
And um I want to be clear about something.
I probably shouldn't say this, but I'm just going to anyway.
You know, 'cause I'm so impulsive.
But um
The way things are going, you may think like
I muted?
No fucking way I'm muted.
I'm not muted.
I'm not muted.
Alright.
You may have this idea.
That like infrared is going in a more uh
in a more clean direction.
And the truth is, is that no, we're just biding our time a little bit.
The truth is, is that reality
is going in a more infrared direction.
And we I've always known that, and we've always known that as a community, I like to think.
And we just had to bide our time a fucking little bit.
And we're gonna keep doing that slowly and patiently, just like China's socialism with Chinese characteristics.
See, it's like it's exactly like that, you know?
The capitalists are experiencing reality normally.
Oh yeah, it's just the normal.
And then slowly they don't even fucking know the the rug is being pulled under their feet.
They're gonna wake up in socialism one day.
It's the same exact thing, except
Except, instead of socialism, it's the ability to say retarded.
Without any controversy at all.
And that's the direction reality is going in.
In many other words,
That are not allowed.
It's exactly the same logic, it's the same thing.
We have become more cold and ruthless with respect to that, you know?
And what about it?
What about the, you know, being nice?
I never agreed to that.
This is Tartarian strategy.
Exactly.
Someone gets it here.
Someone gets it here.
Alright?
Somebody understands it here.
I haven't changed.
I've just changed a little bit the strategy as far as um how infrared is gonna conquer.
Conquer the discourse.
But the goal has always been the same conquest of the discourse and destruction of the prevailing discursive activity.
Anyway, guys,
Before we get into the Patreon QA, I want to talk about what Elon Musk is doing in the UK.
Um
I don't know guys.
I
Some people are like, well, George Soros intervenes.
Why can't he intervene in the elections?
There's nothing wrong with it.
And I feel like that's a discursive trap.
That is a distraction from the question of why is he doing it?
What is his real intention?
Is Elon Musk just hecking the meme lord who's just freaking outraged by the grooming gangs?
And he's just finally like, is it just freaking Elon Musk?
Is it really 2025 is about to get lit?
Just like he said, and he's just, yeah, we're doing it.
The memes are taking over.
I don't know if I buy that, you know?
Just forgive me for not.
Um blindly accepting that.
Without any you know, scepticism.
It starts to kind of seem like this is a psyop.
And you know what actually convinced me of this in the case of the UK, especially?
Well, first of all, Elon Musk randomly out of the blue started to talk about the grooming gang thing to overthrow the UK government, more or less.
I mean, overthrow the current administration and dissolve the government.
But why?
Because he cares about grooming gangs?
I don't believe that.
And that story is not new, by the way.
So why now?
It's super suspicious.
But what really tipped me over the edge, and I'm like, okay, this is really a fucking op.
Why did Elon Musk start tweeting that Nigel Farage had to resign from the Reform Party?
Why the fuck was he so adamant about that?
When he started saying Nigel Farage had to resign, I was like, oh.
This is the Department of Defense who wants to, for some reason, dissolve the UK, put pressure on by the way, this isn't the US interfering in the UK's affairs.
This is the shadowy Anglo-Atlanticist elites launching a fucking coup against their own governmental superstructure under the guise of some populistic uprising.
When in reality they're doing a self coup and they're gonna throw baby out with the bathwater and probably erode and lock the doors and throw away the key with respect to future possible manifestations of popular sovereignty.
What do I mean by that?
If in the UK they dissolve Parliament and have an emergency state, it's like, Yeah, that we got what we wanted, the wokes are gone, justice for the grooming stuff.
Sure.
But who, what if they eliminate any ability for the people, and I'm going to say that naively, just anyone outside of the system to challenge the government and elect people and stuff?
Like throwing away democracy or even liberal democracy entirely.
We all know liberalism is cringe and liberal democracy is retarded.
But if the militarist cartels of Atlanticist finance capital have these
You know, dictatorships
Um, doesn't it make it kind of impossible for
Like, I don't know, any legal opposition at all.
Forget about, like, Starmer and the woke retards.
I don't care about them, but
I want people to consider the long term implications of this because it's a kind of thing where I th it seems like they're trying to lock the door and throw away the key.
Um
And that is
What is wrong with Nigel to them?
I think it probably convinced me that for example, Nigel was willing to work with George Galloway, which tells me that in some respects Farage is probably
A actual real populist of some kind.
I'm not saying he's good or bad, I'm saying that he probably isn't a complete shill who's bought out and who's an agent of the system.
But I'm kind of convinced he's probably outside the system because they're trying desperately to get rid of him.
And, you know, I want to be clear about the um
The grooming gang stuff.
I have thoughts on that as well.
Um.
I think that if Western countries and I don't want to contribute to this discourse because it's ten years old and it's being revived for nefarious reasons.
Not even for racist reasons.
I think genuinely some weird fuck shit is going on with this self-coo stuff.
But regardless, um
I think that there are immigrants who come to the UK, to Europe.
Who harbor a lot of hatred of the ordinary people that live in those countries.
And that's not because they're avenging the crimes of colonialism and they're avenging the crimes of imperialism.
It's.
Because these lumpin' elements just are anti-social psychopaths who hate normal, ordinary, decent common people and probably would in any country they lived in.
You know, ISIS was not particularly good for the locals that lived in Syria and Iraq.
Okay, so understand these are just lumpin' scum who just fucking hate and yeah, they have resentment and just hatred and all this fucking disgusting, vile venom that they have against just ordinary common working people.
And um I think it is a marker of
a um strong culture to not recognize them.
And what I mean to say is that we are not going to recognize your hatred and your resentment.
We are just gonna enforce our laws on you and treat you like anyone else, which means we're gonna publicly fucking execute you.
And that's what should fucking happen to those people.
Publicly execute them.
And have a fucking stone tablet that says anybody who does this gets publicly executed.
You can be a fucking immigrant who's coming here and you hate you know you hate uh the the you hate Christians and you hate we don't care what your fucking reason is.
This is the law of our culture and our society and we're gonna beat the shit out of you and publicly execute you.
And you know what country does that?
Russia.
Russia never recognizes the motivations of terrorists and other anti-social scum.
They say, We are Russian society.
These are our laws.
These are how we treat scum like you.
Doesn't matter what your religion or your race is.
We don't care about.
See, the stupid thing I see on X that people are doing is they're like, oh, look at how much these people hate us white people.
They hate us so much.
We should hate them back.
And it's like, you are letting yourself be defined by this.
And you don't
Understand that like
That that recognition you're giving is exactly what those people want.
Those criminals, I mean.
That's exactly what they want.
They want that recognition more than anything.
And um that's my thoughts on that whole thing, by the way.
Um don't even give any fucking low life scum the recognition of having their subjective motivations in any way be acknowledged.
Just with the brutal, mighty force of nature itself, get justice.
Get justice by executing them in public.
And absolutely I believe in the death penalty.
I mean, you need to think about this, guys.
There are some crimes for which there need to be public executions.
Some crimes so hein and it's so just, there's something so fundamentally just about that.
Someone has committed such an egregious, unthinkable crime, you've traumatized society, you've eroded the trust of society, you've you've you've committed an injury against the public, therefore justice and restitution for the public is that you're publicly executed.
And that, you know, why that's justice, and it's not just cruelty, and it's not sadism?
I'll tell you exactly why.
If a rapist is raping someone
You are stooping to their level by having the punishment be them getting raped in public.
Absolutely not.
The justice of a society is asserting itself when you just publicly execute a rapist.
You have traumatized us, the public, by eroding our faith in our in our each other.
by having committed this Evil Highness disgusting act.
But we are not gonna respond to you by doing what you did.
We are going to respond to you by enforcing our justice and our law
And asserting that as dominant and supreme versus your subjective filth.
Our objective beheading or hanging, our objective rope or sword or gun, whatever, versus your subjective filth.
And that is my justification for lawful public executions of people like the grooming gang, perpetrators, other kinds of scum, rapists, whatever.
So, um child uh uh abusers
Does it have to be public?
Yes, it does.
Because when the public hears about things like the grooming gang shit, man, the public has just been injured, okay?
Not just the victims were injured, the public was injured by that.
And the public needs justice.
There needs to be public justice.
That is proportional to the injury committed against the public.
You know?
So
That's my view on that, since I have to chime in on it.
That's my view on it.
Perpetrators were Pakistani, but the Johns were majority white.
See, I mean, like, it shouldn't even, it shouldn't matter.
It shouldn't matter.
Any competent society would have blind justice for such crimes, regardless of the subjective intent, the state of mind, or the particular background, racially or religious, of the perpetrators.
We don't care.
I don't give a fuck who you are.
We're just gonna treat you how we treat anyone, any kind of animal who does this.
What if I'm a Catholic and I oppose this?
You know, I mean, look, I don't, forgive me if I'm fucking wrong.
Didn't, weren't you guys the ones who, like, oversaw the Dark Ages or some shit?
Like, y'all, okay, so in the Catholic Dark Ages, y'all were not fucking, like, beheading people and roundhouse, fucking, you know, roundhouse kicking people's heads off and shit, like, in public and fucking smashing people's faces with iron gauntlets and like fucking torturing them and shit and making them hang off castles and shit.
What the fuck are you talking about?
All right, breaking them with wheels.
Morning stars and burning people and shit.
Well I'm Catholic and I have a problem with this.
That's the weirdest shit I've ever heard in my life, right?
Anyway
Uh am I am I wrong?
Am I wrong, by the way?
Um
So, uh, yeah, I'm not wrong.
Exactly.
So, uh, yeah, that's my view.
Um,
No, uh uh death p the death penalty is not barbaric and especially not the public one.
You know what's fucking barbaric is that weird shit they do in America where they're just like, ooh, it's so weird.
The um lethal injection in a closed room with glass.
It's so creepy 'cause it's like um that's why I'm asserting this revolutionary dynasty meme.
Because America will have a monarchical turn one way or another.
I hate to say it, fellow Americans,
Fellow Americans, I'm saying this as a fucking foreign infiltrator, a an Arab Muslim barbarian who was born here and infiltrated this fine country with Sharia law.
Um, but no, listen, fellow Americans.
Our whole national identity being angry with a gun protecting our front lawn, as much as I want to preserve that, as m and you may not believe that, but I do desperately don't want to have to move past that.
We are going to be forced as a country to finally reckon with the reality of monarchical power in our lifetime, by the way.
So that will either be the proletarian dictatorship or it's going to be Baron Trump's awkward fucking loser nerd
Self, you know, I ain't Baron Tramp or Megan Markle fucking like with some pomp and circumstance cringe shit.
All right.
So choose Asiatic, Oriental, Tartarian, Tamerlane, Mandarin.
Sta like cool barbarian prince.
Or pomp and circumstance, you know, Meghan Markle cringe nonsense.
You choose, all right?
Rocky Mountain, barbaric.
Cons
Or
Canada, Megan Markle, Pomp and Circumstance.
That's gonna be the choice.
All right.
You guys, my the meme that I, the Revolutionary Dynasty meme, will make sense in like 10 years or five years.
I'm always early, but you need to also understand something, guys.
I'm always early to everything.
I was always early with everything.
So, but I understand that I'm early, so I'm not gonna try to push it farther than where it can go.
I know I'm early, okay?
Um
Anyway, I don't know how the fuck I got here.
But y oh yeah, I'm suspicious of Elon Musk.
Uh okay, we have to do the Patreon QA.
I don't care whatever I had planned beyond that.
We are going to have to do this now.
Okay, let me start the Patreon Q and A.
Greetings patrons.
I've started recording for our Patreon QA.
The last one we did was August.
Wow, you guys have been scammed.
Okay, AJ from five months ago.
All right, you know what?
Well there's barely any comments here.
This is ridiculous.
Uh how can one support the A Guys, don't kill me, alright?
How can one support the ACP if they're in a position where they can't join the ACP openly?
Ah, AJ, five from five months ago, actually.
Wait two weeks, and we are going to streamline the joining process in an incredibly, incredibly easy, efficient way.
And we are opening up a process of joining that will also allow you to contribute and, you know, be a part of our party in some capacity without having to fully commit to it.
like our cadre do.
So you won't be cadre, but you will be a part of the party.
So wait.
Just be patient.
Fred.
Thank you so much for being a patron to you, Fred, and everyone else.
Why is accelerationism popular in the infrared community?
Because I've talked about it and Nick Land and stuff, and I have real connections to that milieu, I suppose.
It seems people want to quickly skip through the unfolding pages of history rather than have a let the events unfold on their own and act accordingly approach.
But I think that is the accelerationist view, right?
What would be the best approach?
Well, definitely.
Well, part of the nature of how events are unfolding is that they're demanding responses, okay?
And there will be a response regardless.
So we have to intervene decisively in being responsive to history.
And we have to do so in a way that facilitates the most rapid acceleration of the contradictions suspended in development.
I hope that answers your question.
Ed, thank you so much for being a patron.
What are the four horizontal stripes on the ACP logo Sympathize?
We either have or have not formally
We I don't think we have formalized that.
It's up to interpretation.
Um Zerwini, thank you so much for being a patron.
Do you think the Armitage family in the movie Get Out is a good reflection of something
I have not seen that movie in like twenty years and I thought that movie was stupid too.
Sorry for being an asshole.
Michael, thank you so much for being a patron.
I'm seeing many comrades diss themselves from dictator and authoritarian.
Uh it depends on who you're talking to.
Uh if you're talking to an ordinary people
On the street, you should just be normal.
But on the internet, in terms of the meme stuff, we don't want to run away from that.
We're doubling down.
Regime, dynasty, all that stuff.
Benign!
Thank you for being a patron.
Historically, in Marx, let me just read this and then I'll answer it.
And one of the petty woozoo has been defined to a small producers and what is now referred to as the PMC.
What is the same term for seemingly different social classes?
What utility does the term give?
Um, how compared was a master craftsman with a modern trades person?
Oh, okay.
Two questions.
Um, okay, uh, thank you.
Okay, good questions.
Um.
The reason the PMC types are defined as petty bourgeois in the same uh just as the small producers were well not just as, but the same word was used for both is because the PMC
Partake in the um
In the um
the revenues of the uh the bourgeoisie, first of all, and uh they are also a product of bourgeois institutions.
They are their existence and their way of life is attached to bourgeois institutions and the bourgeois superstructure.
Um also, I'll even go farther because I've talked about this before actually.
The way the bourgeoisie as a class has distributed itself, is a word I like to use in the 21st century, is no longer as exclusively a class of owners.
The way the bourgeois class manifests itself is through the kind of corporate ladder.
You're climbing the corporate ladder.
It's, you know, to further your career.
And at the top is like CEO or something, right?
And so that's why these PMC types are petty bourgeois, because on the corporate ladder, they are kind of either intermediary or they're lower, but they're on the same spectrum, which defines qualitatively the bourgeoisie as a class today.
Which are no longer simply owners, right?
They are people who are defined by
They're um
Place within bourgeois institutions.
Now, the thing about small producers has always been a difficulty within Marxism.
The Russian word for peasant actually just means farmer.
Not many people know that.
These were just subsistence farmers, right?
And the reason they were wrongly assumed to be petty bourgeois is because it was assumed they were just this vestigial thing that was going to be proletarianized and modernized by the development of capitalism.
But that's not what happened.
It's not that that didn't end up happening outside of England.
In order for the modernization of the farmers, right?
Uh in the case of Germany there had to be a kind of um like a extremely interventionist social state, you know, dare I say socialistic type of development t that took place which you know um turned them into a middle class, you know, through direct intervention uh politically.
Case of Russia speaks for itself.
Um
Now, as for small shop owners and master craftsmen, I've always kind of thought about it in terms of a paradigm of modernization.
So the bourgeoisie literally means the urban dwellers, the burghers, right?
And atop the urban foundation upon which the bourgeoisie rests also lie other kinds of small shop owners and so on and so on.
And that and ultimately, remember this.
Urbanization is fundamentally an expression of politics, right?
Um, the urban is the construction of ways of living.
And life that is predicated upon political power.
Well, the p politics itself, it's in the word polity, right?
And um
That is
That is also something to consider, right?
Is the kind of urban rule or the antagonism between town and country dynamic.
So there's a lot of ways of looking at it.
Now, regarding the question of whether today's tradespeople are comparable to master craftsmen, the reason I would push back on that is because today's tradespeople rest upon an institutionalized foundation of social labor or general labor based in a social contract with the US government.
That provided a minimum of concessions and so on and so on with the historical proletariat.
And upon that foundation, do like tradespeople arise.
They are not master craftsmen because master craftsmen were emerging atop the foundation of guilds rather than this kind of general labor manifested in a social contract with the entire state.
So that would be the distinction off the top of my head.
I can elaborate it and think about it better if I have more time.
Sam, thank you so much for being a patron.
Do you consider left communists as being part of Western Marxism?
Sure, why not?
With all the other retarded trash.
Can I say that on Patreon?
I don't know.
Anon, how do we reconcile.
Uh I don't think I'm uploading this one to Patreon, guys.
Uh anyway.
But I okay.
How do we reconcile the culture of American rugged individualism with socialism of Chinese characteristics?
What I'm going to do is upload this to YouTube, unlist it.
Or upload it to a YouTube channel, unlist it, and then link it to the Patreon.
Perfect.
Um
How do we reconcile rugged individualism with social society's characteristics?
I'll stop you right there and say that I think America is headed for a barbaric stage.
See, we are not even barbarians yet in America.
We are in a pre social existence as Americans.
We are fundamentally blind, walking through blind and improvising with respect to our common social existence.
And barbarism is a stage of civilization we are now about to enter into.
The Bronze Age is going to happen in America again.
So we will discover collectivism in this country.
We are starting to.
Look at the H-1B debate.
Are we just an economic opportunity zone of individuals?
You know, it's not a racial thing either, by the way.
As far as how MAGA sees it, it's like, well, we're Americans.
We're the people already fucking living here.
You know?
So.
Hold that thought, I guess.
Violet, thank you so much for being a patron.
I've been speaking to a left comm.
That's your first mistake.
And he claims that ML's understanding of sovereignty is neo-Hobbsian.
So Schmidian?
Hobbes trying to curb the power of the Virginia Company as a threat to the sovereign.
He games is no different from how CBC operates.
No, because.
The Virginia Company,
Ah I see.
Um
Well, no, be even then, no, because the CPC is not because the companies that exist in China are not rivals that, you know, rise to the status ever of the CPC.
They are either manifestations of the civil society that is controlled.
By the party or they are themselves party owned, right?
So it's a fundamental difference.
Zerwiny, do you think the collapse of Socialism in the Soviet bloc was historically necessary or contingent?
Um, it was avoidable, absolutely, but
Maybe it was necessary for us to learn how it could have been avoided, you know?
'Cause there were a lot of fucking retards who thought it wasn't gonna happen in the eighties, and it did.
Do you think the Socialist Parties could have led to an alternative outcome?
Yeah, I do.
And how would you make of Mao calling the USR fascist in the sixties?
You know, Mao was like the first Jackson Hinkle.
Taking him literally and like not understanding what he was a very literary guy.
And a lot of people don't understand that.
You know, like.
What was the point he was trying to make?
The point he was trying to make is that the USSR
Was going in a uh bad direction under Khrushchev?
Was being was was it partaking in um
Aggression towards China.
He wasn't like undialectically calling it fascist.
Like qualitatively, it's the same as Nazi Germany.
He was saying that like, oh, if the USSR doesn't change its orientation, you know, you it's acting in a fascistic way, like more kind of like that, you know?
Should not be taken like literally.
Do you think capitalism and modernity were necessary for humanity?
Yeah, well, that's what I said in the video before.
According to some estimates, U.S.
payments, this is the same person, by the way, Serbini.
Payments of interest, the national debt is forecast to surpass $1 trillion.
How do you think the U.S.
government is going to react?
Interesting question.
I think that it's probably going to okay, I have a crazy prediction.
I think what it's going to do is that what has always been done in history when debts are insurmountable within the Western trajectory is that it's going to liquidate the debt by formalizing it into a
An obligation, you know, a s uh um
Similar to slavery and or serfdom or something.
And I think people will be asked to trade their political rights for some kind of economic um relief.
But that will come with the price of basically not being full US citizens anymore, but b people who could like be deported or who won't have access to like voting rights or something like that.
So that is my very pessimistic prediction.
Because I am the left-wing Alex Jones.
XYZ, thanks so much for being a patron.
Have you ever gone through periods where you thoroughly question the correctness?
Of course, every second of every day.
And how do you maneuver this?
I just.
I think it through.
I really think about it.
Um and I realize like uh look at the end of the fucking day however much doubt you have there's the three gorges damn.
And it wasn't built
By liberalism.
What is required for a new ML synthesis to become canonized?
A a new successful acquisition of power somewhere.
Literally.
A new revolutionary tradition.
That's that's what it is.
That's the test.
What would the strategy be for a communist in a country where the proletariat is of immigrant status?
I don't believe that exists anywhere in the world except Kuwait or the Gulf countries.
And the strategy is to destroy those countries in terms of like their borders.
Just they should be annexed.
Wallo, thanks for being a patron.
Lenin and Stalin repeatedly discussed the peasant question.
Is there an equivalent?
Yeah, I've talked about it a lot with the mecca proletariat and the exo-peasantry thing.
More or less, the peasant class, the subsistence farmers, have merged with the modern proletariat to form what, you know, was described today as like the middle class or the blue-collar workers, more or less, in general.
But the peasants never were eliminated, or the element of subsistence, it is a kind of geospatial dimension of civilization, similar to language, that is not reducible to class antagonism, but is characterized, but is the foundation of class struggle, the battleground of it.
Alaskan, thanks so much for being a patron.
How about we use the KPRF?
It's the second most popular party in Russia.
Do you think they could achieve state power?
Maybe.
Okay, very long paragraph.
KK, I'm just gonna read it.
My answer to you is: read Michael Hudson's Super Imperialism.
Lenin's Imperialism was written 100 years ago.
A lot of things have changed since then in terms of how the global system works.
That is my very simple answer.
ReZero, thanks so much for being a patron.
Have you paid any attention to the Green Party?
No.
I think Jill Stein may be more aligned with us.
That's fine, but
But I don't care.
Uh fine, work with them.
I'm fine with working with them.
What?
No, in terms of do I care about Jill Stein.
Or sorry, no in terms of am I paying attention to the Green Party.
No, I'm not.
I'm paying attention to the Red Party.
That is my Patreon Q and A.
which I cannot upload to Patreon 'cause I said retard.
Anyway, guys, we're ending the stream now.
Um unless someone's about to donate a lot, in which case I will stay
But it's too late because the stream is over.
So don't, because I'm literally ending it right now, gay?
Oh, what happened in Syria?
Yeah, it's really bad.
The um Jolani guys are just beheading and killing a bunch of.
Alawites and Christians, it's very bad.
Mm.
And they're telling the world that they've changed.
First of all, I mean, that he was in ISIS.
Why did anyone believe that?
He was in ISIS.
Did people like, oh, well, that was just like, that's how crazy the fucking internet's becoming.
Dude was in ISIS.
But that that's like from like twenty thousand trillion years ago.
Like that's like that's like when the Harlem Shake was a meme.
It's like holy fuck the short attention span.
Like, that's attention spans, just crazy.
They're hiking government salaries 400%.
Yeah, it lends credence to the theory that.
The Assad government was incredibly corrupt.
And this coup happened probably because Assad threatened maybe to curb corruption a little bit.
And then these corrupt fucks in government are like, fuck that, bring ISIS and now they're giving themselves a pay raise and the corruption will increase to proportions beyond anything we've ever seen under SAD.
So
There we go.
Anyway, guys, I'll see you maybe tomorrow.
All right.
Goodbye.