Stomp on all snake bitches

I'm not sure if I can do it.

Yeah.

Wahaya Tintahan, Kaitana Mitikam, Sayasiktifat Gulenawara Kariya Makanjar, Allah Asla, Se Satmaz, Yushuja Kaltmausan, Shikurle Kalmawasan, Desina Kalpatashun, Dahagem Sindell, Wahaya Pasamatbar, Shuruk Merdeven, Sendembi Isti Ham, Devama Istia Far Gerekan Ir Tiba, Yishinde, Allah Inde, Allah Sijunde, Allah Tunde, Allah Akumba, Allah Ashkunda.

Allah Allah Hasfira fi Janala Mafir albirullah.

And Salama right ahead.

The sala la

I'm not sure what I'm doing.

Yaje tekitapta yazul of the Quran, Durba, Urdaj flow musab Manatar Hakitab, Yalamba Hakikat, Jabasatarikat, Sana Yobazdale, Bello Mazdale, On Margibidusham Medik Jejobandal, Misman's Dishunge Mesnzander, Wakistedi Mitchlasader, Isrape Mitala Ishinde, Allah, Inde, Allah, Zikunde, Allah, Dikunde, Allah, Akunda, Allah, Ashunda, Allah, Asunda, Allah, Khananda, Allah, Aspira Jalala, Mafir al-Bira.

Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wa sallam.

Goodawara Kariar Vakanja Khallah Asla Seyla Satmaz, Deshunja Kalp Mawsum, Shikurle Khal Mawsum, Yesina Kalp Atashum Ninawa STL, Dahagem Sindell, Wayapasa Matbar, Shuruk Merdevane, Senda Miki Ham, Devama Isti Afar, Gereka Ba

Allah inde, Allah Sikunde, Allah Ikunde, Allah Akunda, Allah Ashunda, Allah Asunda, Allah Khanda, Allah Ashfirafi Jana Mafiralira.

Muhammad sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.

Sana Yobazdell, Bello Mazdale, On Margibushum Medic Jejobandelle, Bismanas Dushunje Misfusn Zander, Vakistede with Lesalder, Zrape Mitala Zishinde, Allah Inde, Allah Zikunde, Allah Zikunde, Allah Akunda, Allah, Ashunda, Allah, Asunda, Allah, Khanunda, Allah, Mafi Ralbira.

My son laughs.

Nevsky comet M the Tech Jara

Guindindawara Kariya Makanjak Allah Asla Seyl Satmaz, Leshundje Kalpma Sam, Shikura Khalmawasum, Yesina Kalpatashima Estiyale, Dahagem Sindale, Wayapasamatar, Shuk Merdevenne, Senda Mi Istiham, Devama Isti Afar, Yereka Ba Allah, Ishunde, Allah, Ilinde, Allah, Sikunde, Allah, Ikunde, Allah Akunda, Allah Ashkunda, Allah Asunda, Allah Khanda, Allah Aspirafikan Allah, Mafir al-Dira.

Muhammad sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.

Still a Jeffrey Liman.

Sana Yofazdelle, Bello Mazdale, Omar Gibushum Metik Jejobandelle, Bismas Manas Dushunje Mesus Nizander, Vakistedim Sadr, Isra Mitalla Isishinde, Allah Inde, Allah, Situnde, Allah, Situnde, Allah, Akunda, Allah, Ashunda, Allah, Asunda, Allah, Khanunda, Allah, Aspirafijala, Afi al-Biha, No Muhammad Sallallah, La Ila.

Goodawalakariar Bakanja Allah Asla Seila Satmaz, Deshunja Kalp Mawsum, Shikura Khalmawasum, Yesina Kalp Atashum Dunahma Estiel, Da Hagim Sindell, Wayapasa Matbar, Truth Merdende, Sendemi Istia Ham, Devama Isti Afar, Gereka Ir Tiba Ishunde, Allah, Idunde, Allah Sukunde, Allah, Allah Akunda, Allah Ashkunda, Allah Asunda, Allah Khanunda, Allah Ashfira Fikan Allah, Mafir al-Birair.

Muhammad sallallahu alaihi

Muhammad sallallahu alaihi

I'm not sure if I can do it.

Yeah.

With the town, what's going on, bro?

Hello with the ten, what's going on, bro?

How we doing?

What the fuck is up, y'all?

What the fuck is up everybody?

What are we doing?

So maybe you have, maybe you haven't seen my speech at the Marxism Conference on Friday.

It did not go as long as I wanted it to, unfortunately.

Tanky, what's up?

I went really long.

I was supposed to deliver a 45-minute speech.

I thought I could meet the 45-hour mark, but like it was like, I don't know, 70 minutes, and I still wasn't even halfway through.

So I jumped right to the conclusion.

But, guys, tell me how you feel about the light, by the way.

Do you like it, how it's darker, or do you like the old light setup?

Because I kind of don't want it to be so bright because I don't.

You see, I don't wear the sunglasses because it's actually at a reasonable brightness.

You like the brighter one?

Okay, we'll see.

Um anyway y'all anyway y'all yeah if you saw the uh the Marxism conference then uh you'll know that I gave an incomplete uh speech, it wasn't actually finished, and uh you know.

We probably need to follow up and talk more about that shit, right?

Right, right, right.

I mean, I don't even know if y'all saw that Marxism conference anyway.

But in any case, let me tell you guys something.

I'm going to say some real ass shit in the Midwestern Marx comment section in the live stream that they did.

Genuine fucking retarded brainlets.

And I'm starting to get a conspiracy in my head.

Starting to have this fucking idea that the people who take issue with this Islam revolution, the revolution of the East, the Tartarian Revolution, the Islamic Revolution, these are a bunch of fucking bitches, corrupt enemies of humanity.

And I stomp on them like I stomp on fucking snakes.

You understand?

There's a revolution happening in the air.

I wanna be fucking frank about what's going on.

There's a revolution happening.

Okay?

Those of you who are in our party, you know there's a revolution going on in our party, in our American Communist Party.

There's a revolution happening in the party.

There's a revolution happening in the world.

There's a revolution happening in the productive forces with the rise of AI.

There's a revolution happening in the world order.

With the end of the US Empire.

At every level, we are living in the time.

Of the auspicious conjunction.

We are living in a time of turmoil, revolution, and change.

And absolutely, I will guide you through this fucking era.

I will guide you through this fucking era gladly.

You understand?

I'm not telling you.

I'm not telling you.

To conjure up an inspiration inside of you, in order to muster what it fucking takes to follow me through this shit.

What I am telling you is to speak to the inspiration that already fucking brought you here in the first place soberly and honestly and trust it.

Trust your fucking gut instinct and fucking go with it.

And once you establish that fucking trust, you blindly, you blindly follow through this revolution to its final and fullest conclusion.

You bet your fucking ass Islam is at the center of this revolution.

Islam.

AI.

The resurrection of world communism.

These are the things that are happening in the world if you have some fucking eyes to see them, okay?

There's something happening in the world today.

Islam, AI, the rise of Central Asia, the rise

Of communism, the specter of

History haunting the world.

I'll guide you through this era.

I'll guide you through it.

But in order for me to guide you through it, you need to identify the counter revolutionaries.

You need to identify these fucking infidels.

Am I an unreasonable fucking person?

I'm not a.

I don't force religion on anyone.

That's not what this is about, okay?

What this is fucking about is very simple, that the shit I'm saying is so compelling, so fucking convincing, okay?

That it's causing people doubt inside of them.

It's causing them to fucking have an existential fucking crisis because of how fucking true it is.

You understand?

And in order to combat this truth within themselves, they're fucking coping.

They're coping.

They're crashing out.

They're trying to move against me.

All this kind of shit.

Here's what I have to say to these fucking people.

I operate in the light of fucking day, you bitch.

You understand?

This is an Islamic revolution.

This is not the old testament.

This is not the old era.

This is the Islamic revolution.

I live in the light of fucking day on the surface.

On the surface of the fucking text.

Do you understand?

This is exotiric.

I'm bringing the esoteric to the exoty.

You understand?

There is nobody on earth more.

Who will dwell and feast in the light of day than me, bitch.

Every fucking snake, every fucking snake burrowed underground, hissing and bullshitting.

I will flush you the fuck out into the light of day and I will stomp on your bitch ass.

You understand?

You need to understand what this Islamic revolution is going to entail.

A lot of people aren't going to be happy with it.

But there's going to be, you know, that Sufi videos where they're fucking swarming in a circle like that, right?

Where they're fucking moving in a circle, swarming.

That's the type of shit we're going to fucking be on.

You're going to be with the swarm or you're going to be crushed underneath, bitch.

That's what we're fucking going forward with.

We are the horde.

Yes, we are that.

That's the type of shit that we're on.

We got no patience, no tolerance for special little personalities, fucking millennial crashouts, and other fucking bitches that want to get in the fucking way of our cyclone, bitch.

This is a fucking cyclone.

It's a fucking tornado.

You either go with it or you get caught up in it.

Either fucking way, it's having its way through this shit.

I want to be crystal fucking clear.

The audacity, I don't give a fuck.

By the way, but this is America, and in America, people are I don't give a fuck, bitch.

This is happening.

I don't give a fuck.

You understand?

Open it.

Hey, hey, listen, listen.

Listen, look at me.

Look at me now.

I am the American now.

Do you understand?

Do you understand what this means?

The totality, the integral totality, of the all.

cannot be resisted or avoided.

You cannot resist integration.

You cannot

You can there is nothing you can do to to prevent.

What else can we call it except jihad?

You can't stop the jihad.

You can't stop it.

It's a tornado.

It's a cyclone.

It's a natural force of history.

It will move regardless of anyone's feelings, of anyone's.

And by the way,

If you take your feelings to the logical conclusion, you will arrive at this position.

If you take your even your thoughts that come willy-nilly, you know, the problem with people acting on their fucking thoughts and their feelings.

I'll tell you why people who act on their feelings and thoughts 99% of the time are fucking retard scumbags.

Because they don't even sit down and take time to cultivate their thoughts and their feelings.

Whatever they shit out in the moment, they shit out onto us and we have to fucking care about it, right?

But they don't ever reflect on it, they don't ever cultivate.

And what does that mean?

That means why do communist parties hate individualists?

Because usually when an individualist is shitting out their immediate feelings and thoughts and ideas, they're just recycling and absorbing exactly what they're getting from the bourgeois hegemony and shitting it out lazily.

And that's why we have no fucking patience or tolerance for it.

You know, I'm sure in a communist society, being an individualist spontaneously, that's totally fine.

Because what you're the in you're breathing in in a communistic environment where goodness prevails and where the snake of evil is fucking being suppressed and stomped onto the fucking ground.

You understand?

So it's completely different.

But alas, alas, I need to talk to you guys about something very serious, right?

I have to remember.

I have to remember because I took notes for this fucking stream.

Actually, I took notes in this stream, okay?

So, okay, you got that one.

Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, I know the type of shit that we're all right, listen to me, y'all.

ChatGBT just came out with the most powerful AI model that the world has ever seen.

ChatGBT 6 Astra, okay.

And it's got us thinking about a lot of fucking things, okay?

It's got us thinking about a lot of fucking things, which is.

You know, recently I heard recently that even drones, drone pilots are being automated now.

So the fucking drones are going to be happening with AI, right?

So I want us to ask a very simple fucking question.

What is this?

Why are all these things happening at the same time?

Why coincidentally with the rise of AI is Islam blowing up in the world?

Okay?

I mean, because it is, it's like a it's r it's acquiring an even newer, renewed significance than it ever fucking has ever had.

Right?

We are all becoming Islamicate.

And y it all comes down to labor and the proletariat.

And if you look at the writings of the Black Panthers in America, that will actually help you fucking clarify where we're at in terms

Of why all these things are converging together in a way.

And if you once you fucking see it, you cannot fucking unsee it, okay?

So strap the fuck in.

Because I gave that lecture at the Marxism Conference, I didn't have enough fucking time.

Now I have some fucking time, okay?

So I got a lot of shit I want to talk to you guys about.

And reflect.

regarding that that I didn't have time to at that time.

You understand?

First of all.

I made the comment before that Muslims are lazy.

Islam is a very leisure-centric culture or civilization.

Even Marx talked about this when he was in the cafe in Algeria, right?

Emilo, what's up with the 10?

Appreciate it.

They don't have the Protestant work ethic.

They don't have that.

But I wonder if.

That is actually more correct.

And that we're missing something about what work actually fucking is.

Okay?

And

I want to just forget about Islam for one second, all right?

Go to the writings of the Black Panthers.

Eldridge Cleaver was a horrific scumbag.

He was really fucked up, like a really fucked up guy.

But I think he's the one who wrote about this, and this became the v official view of the Black Panther Party.

So the sixties and seventies is when automation started happening on a mass scale when it came to factory automation.

Actually, it wasn't recent.

The rise of the use of automation and robots and shit, that was happening in the sixties and seventies, okay?

And that played a huge role.

In the process of deproletarianization, okay, and the rise of lumpenization.

The Black Panthers came to a theory where they basically said

that because of the rise of automation and the rise of mass unemployment and the rise of the lumpin, that the lumpin' were now the revolutionary subject.

Okay?

The lumpin' are the revolutionary subject.

This is the conclusion the Black Panthers came to.

And then I started thinking about some shit.

Were they actually talking about the lump in the?

We need to start thinking in big ways in a hypothetical way, okay, because

I think I've underestimated AI in a lot of ways.

And the scary thing is that robotics is on the horizon.

Skeletal humanoid robotics is on the horizon.

And if you think AI is not going to be powerful enough,

It's like the problem is AI agent paradigm.

Like, AI actually can get to a point probably where some physical labor can be done by AI.

I doubted that this was going to be possible.

Just years ago, I doubted it was going to be possible.

But it's going to be possible much sooner than you fucking think it is.

Okay, there's not a single type of employment or work that is done manually.

That I can think of that cannot be automated with AI.

The only thing is the energy costs, maybe, or something, but we're getting there very quickly, okay?

Much sooner than you fucking think.

Okay, so that's why it's worth returning to the Black Panther Party and what they were writing about in the 60s and 70s and thinking about what the fuck the Black Panther Party actually fucking was.

Okay.

So, and DeLoz and Guattari actually overlap with them on certain points.

So, they mentioned something called the lumpin.

The lumpin were people that were unemployed, they were basically outside of proletarian industrialized labor, and they were thrown off into the desert or the steppe, if you will, of civil society.

Now, maybe you know where I'm getting at now, okay?

The lumpin that Marx and Engels talked about were people that were immediately declassed from their prior class status, usually pre-capitalist and pre-modern in nature, and were this kind of excess that could not be or didn't want to be, agree to be proletarianized, and shows up becoming these kind of dregs of society who just robbed, who just stole, who just.

It wasn't so much that they were outside of the law as much as it was that they were just completely outside of civil society in any capacity, and that they would reactionary because they were still attached to the now-outmoded mode of production.

This is what gave them their reactionary quality because they were declassed and they never transitioned into new relations of production.

So they occupied this liminal space, more or less, which.

You know.

Was a kind of psychosis of civil society, really, you know, if you think about it.

But in any case, the process that the Black Panthers were responding to and witnessing in the time that they lived in was a lot different, okay?

Uh you don't just have in this case lumpenization because how can we speak of being decla I mean, Noah, who was at the Marxism Conference, he coined the term reproletarianization.

And he al although I don't think automation is the main focus of his theory.

It's an acknowledgement of the fact that the dynamic of proletarianization, deproletarianization, reproletarianization, this somehow happens after the capitalist relations of production become dominant.

Okay, so that's really fucking interesting, actually, when you think about it.

So there was a point at which the proletariat was deproletarianized, but you can't say this is lumpin' because they're not descending from a prior mode of production and being declassed.

They're occupying an unchartable, unmappable space outside of civil society, yes, but not quite attached to any mode of production or any prior mode of production.

So this is a kind of post historical subject that the Black Panthers were dealing with, the mass of the unemployed, so to speak, right?

The subject of the Black Panther Party.

Well, the mass of the unemployed

We should call them the nomadic proletariat, which is what Deleuze and Guattari were talking about.

They had a tendency not just to be criminals, but to form alternative.

gangs with their own laws and codes of honor and ways of regulating life.

Well, you can call em gangs, but in history maybe those kind of people would have been called tribes.

And these lumpin that were the subject of the Black Panther Party.

You could try to call them lumpin', but are they really necessarily attached to crime, or is it maybe?

That they

They have moved beyond the civil society of bourgeois civilization and now.

are akin to something

That in history

We call nomads.

Neo Nomads

Nomads are people who carry the law with them where they go.

They're not lawless, they're not criminal necessarily, although there's a lot of wild nomads that are.

But in a state of disorder, nomads are stealing from each other, they're killing each other, and they're forming the law as they go until a tribal conqueror or a unifier, I should say, comes and initiates a kind of revolutionary unity among the nomadic peoples, establishes a new law, a new code of honor that regulates how they interact with each other, and unifies the steppe or the desert.

So this is the prophet of Islam.

This is Genghis Khan.

This is the Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Achaemenid.

Every founder of every empire began that way, by the way.

Okay?

Moses, Abraham.

Well, doesn't that make you think about the Black Panthers a little di a little bit differently?

What if Fred Hampton, who was brokering peace between what we call gangs, we call them gangs, but really.

If we were looking at a long-term view of history, we would call those tribes.

They were tribes.

He was brokering peace between the tribes.

He was unifying the tribes.

The Black Panthers were unifying the tribes.

Doesn't that make some fucking sense?

And you can call them lumping and and whatever, but

How can we take the notion of the lumpin from the 19th century and say this is what describes the deindustrialized kind of post-industrial civilization that did not exist during the time of Marx and Engels whatsoever?

Okay?

I mean the y th these formations

Are not only outside the law, they transcend the law.

These types of associations are literally the only real law that exists in the world, in America.

You think in America the law is dominant?

No, it's not.

Go to any prison and tell me the law is dominant in prison.

No, it's the law of the gangs that dominates in prison.

Okay, well, well, at least in, you know, outside of prison, in normal civil society, outside of criminality, the law dominates.

No, it fucking doesn't.

You think that the federal agents give a shit about the law?

No, they give a shit about their gang leader, Laura Loomer.

They're part of some gang, some faction, something, some subtext that makes them some texture of law that is above the one that's we have on the books formally.

This is a nomadic space.

Just like on the steppe, on the steppe, on the frontier.

You think there's any laws on the frontier?

No.

The law is the law of the tribes.

That's the only thing that exists.

And this is the reality.

Grand Theft Auto type of shit.

What if Grand Theft Auto is not about lumpin'?

What if Grand Theft Auto is like Grand Theft Horse?

The same steppe barbaric context that endangered the necessity of the prophet Zoraster.

You know Zoraster's whole thing was that people were stealing cattle and horses and shit like that on the steppe.

Why is it that when you play Grand Theft Auto 4 or something, the only one I played,

Why do we get these stories of like this is an epic?

Like there is some kind of honor here.

Hip-hop music in America and hip-hop culture in America, black hip-hop culture in America, movies, culture, TV, whatever.

Are these a bunch of depraved, lawless criminals?

Or are these complex groups, whether they're gangs or something, that have a code of honor where an epic involving some sense of morality and the meaning of life is present?

And like it's considered some real ass shit.

Like, this is the human story.

This is where it fucking is, you know?

That's why they say on some real shit, not some fake bullshit.

Because.

The US law, which we follow, okay, we follow the law, we do, right?

We're getting to a point where we have to follow the law because this is a palantir AI killer killer robot world we live in.

You cannot get away with breaking laws in America, you just can't, okay.

But in any case, um

Nobody more nobody think that's an ethical.

thing, okay?

Ethically, we follow US law, but there's not a single soul in the history or is not a single soul living in America today.

Who is morally aligned with the government and its laws?

They're not.

That's not the moral center.

Like, have you guys ever watched a single Hollywood movie where US law was actually the thing, the receptacle of our genuine human morality?

Isn't it so that in every movie you've ever watched or every story that's ever been told in the past four decades, the police and the federal agencies, these are just like some kind of background like

Cynical thing and the real epic where we explore human morality is like completely outside of that.

Like, have you guys ever watched a movie about like gangs and and feuds and rivalries and betrayal and shit like that?

Like whether you're playing Grand Theft Auto, whether you're like watching John Wick, you think John Wick is some law-abiding citizen?

That's it's just like that's what I mean.

Every type of story and narrative

that we think about does not include a notion of the law as a receptacle of moral truth.

And this is even true

in movies where the protagonists are the police.

For example, if you watch True Detective season one, okay?

Yes, the protagonists are FBI agents, but Rust Cole doesn't get his inspiration.

The language, the articulation of his moral cosmos doesn't exist in the law.

It's outside of it.

He is also outside of the law.

The official law, that is.

The only

The only piece of media in the past four decades I can think of where the protagonist, the law enforcer protagonist, is somehow morally aligned with the law is Twin Peaks with Dale Cooper.

Dale Cooper is just like, this is some good coffee.

I am a trooper.

I completely am morally aligned with the correct way of doing things.

And that, my friends, is moral.

But notice what the price of that is even within that narrative.

In order, even for a character like, and that's why Dale Cooper is such a revolutionary figure in a lot of ways.

Precisely his naive allegiance, his blind loyalty to the law.

Which is almost comical sometimes creates a kind of disturbing tension.

Which is manifested in in Lynch's kind of um supernatural uh world surrounding Cooper.

And his kind of us the thing about do you want to know what's revolutionary about Dale Cooper and Twin Peaks?

Does anyone ones if you're still fucking here, because I don't see this fucking chat moving.

What the fuck?

You wanna know the revolutionary thing about Dale Cooper and Twin Peaks?

It's the mere notion that morality and the law, whatever the law so happens to be, stop, now shut up, now stop, okay?

Stop, it's too much now.

It's the

It's the mere notion.

that the moral and the ethical could be united.

It's like not only does Dale Cooper follow the law,

He also believes in it as well.

And the it's like formally that is revolutionary.

Now, the content of the U.S.

law is not revolutionary at all.

And following, I'm not saying, I'm saying just the notion that those the idea that those two could ever be aligned is itself something revolutionary.

But in order for those to be aligned, US law would have to have a revolution, right?

Which is why Dale Cooper is such a disturbing figure.

Nobody believes someone like that could actually exist in the world we inhabit today.

Because everyone knows the government is fucking corrupt, that the FBI is fucking corrupt, right?

Um

So that's what I I hope you understand what I mean by that.

But in any case, that is the one exception I can think of, which comes from David Lynch, where the protagonist is a law enforcement person, and somehow that's still a moral agent.

Yeah, someone, you mentioned breaking bad.

Everyone loves fucking breaking bad, okay?

Walter White is morally great, but the arena with which an authentic exploration of human morality is not happening.

At the level of the law, the official law.

It's happening at the level of, you know, a gray area of the law or e even outs completely outside of the law actually, right?

And the stuff out of which the moral emerges.

That is a

That is a nomadic steppe desert type of environment that is on the frontier environment.

Okay, this is the frontier.

That is where the conquerors and revolutionaries of world history emerge from, these kind of frontiers where official laws break down.

But this has become a ubiquitous condition of human civilization.

Traditionally, the laws of the bourgeois state were associated with a civil society of proletarians and the bourgeoisie and so on and so on.

But when civil society is becoming dis

dysfunctional with the rise of lumpenization because of automation, which is gonna happen at an even more accelerated rate, people are now in a fucking desert.

They're in some kind of steppe type environment, some kind of frontier between civilization itself and barbarism.

And that's why Islam has acquired the renewed significance that it does today.

When you think about it.

There's nowhere w I mean, who were Malcolm X's followers?

So people have a specific association with the lumpin', right?

Why do you have organizations like the Nation of Islam who take these lumpin and they're completely um

straight edge.

They don't smoke, they don't drink, they don't do drugs, they don't steal, they don't rape, they don't do any of these things we associate with wild, violent criminals.

And yet the subject of the nation of Islam were the lumpin.

These are not dynamics that were accounted for or talked about in the 19th century.

Calling these new post-automation masses the lumpin' is fucking wrong, right?

It's not correct.

And you know, I started really fucking thinking about this shit.

Like the straw that broke the camel's back for me thinking about this shit was when I learned the truth is this.

Okay, let's just fucking admit the truth honestly.

The subject of infrared in the beginning were not blue-collar proletarians.

You guys became blue collar proletarians because you were inspired by the message.

This is like the nation of Islam.

You guys before a lot of you were lumping, and that's okay actually.

You weren't lumping in a sense I would agree with.

But

Like, you were just as lumping as the subject of the Black Panthers.

A lot of y'all are, and were.

And you became blue-collar workers.

Out of inspiration, not because you originally were that and started out that way.

So, whether we're, I don't want to call them lumpins, I want to start calling them neo-nomads.

These are neo-nomads, okay?

So let's establish that.

We're living in an era with the rise of neo-nomads.

Well, Islam is a religion of nomads, so it is no surprise whatsoever that in an era of neo-nomadism, Islam acquires the renewed significance that it has.

Wanna like, let's begin with understanding that, okay?

Robots replacing every worker amounts to a suspension of class struggle.

How is it even possible to challenge the center from that position?

Ugh.

I will explain to you why you're thinking about it the wrong way, completely.

You're completely thinking about everything the wrong fucking way, okay?

And uh but in order to explain that to you I have to talk about the premodern world.

The pre modern world was a place where automation was the norm.

But instead of robots doing the automation, it was something called natural automation.

Ecological cycles and natural cycles did more labor.

The labor that people did do was mainly confined to their interaction with a given kind of ecological system.

So for example, in the pre modern world, the world of agrarian relations, like in the Islamic world, people usually had plots that they attended to.

Well, most of the labor that's being done when you own a plot is actually done by nature.

Pastoralists who have cattle and animals and things like that, well,

Ha th th th th that is also automated in a lot of ways because the animals are autonomous beings, right?

Third observer with the 10 what's up?

Appreciate you, bro.

Horses are autonomous forms of embodied intelligence, right?

They're not robots, they come from nature.

But a huge portion of the means of production, more than an industrial modern society, comes from nature.

So, nature actually plays a huge fucking role in defining what the means of production are in the pre-modern era.

Ones, if you understand what I'm saying with that, how nature is a

The a kind of primary form of means of production.

Okay, good, stop stop with the ones, stop, stop it, stop it, stop it, stop it.

Okay, so something different happens in the modern era, okay?

Uh so usually in Asiatic empires you had publicly funded R and D.

You had manufacturers and workshops and laboratories funded by the court.

Whose discoveries would then be kind of adopted and standardized by the empire and reap a profit of some kind, right?

So something different happened with the early modern West, where that system or that relationship was actually decentralized.

And that decentralization is actually associated with

Capital.

Okay.

So a private businessman or merchant would fund a privately owned workshop.

He would hire some scientists and he would pay them to research and develop new methods of production for manufacturers.

And this created a new kind of relationship that we would later call capital, right?

You know, you're investing in capital and means of production and you're reaping a profit for that, more or less.

Okay.

Well, at some point in the history of modern

Civilization that we call the Industrial Revolution.

What is the Industrial Revolution?

What is Industrial Industrialization?

Okay.

What is um

What is industrialization?

What is industrialization?

Well, industrialization in large part

alien alienated labor from a more kind of embedded natural context and creates, you know, the type of labor

Um

Whose premises are no longer nature per se, but some kind of like mechanical simulation of.

Hitherto natural processes, right?

So, industrialization, if I mean, I don't know if I can come up with a simple definition of industrialization right now, but industrialization more or less.

transforms ecological circuits and cycles into something whose premises are artificial and man-made.

So artificiality is at the s at the source and at the foundation of industrialization.

Okay.

When things are industrialized,

The premises of production become fundamentally artificial.

Okay?

There's an artificialization of the means of production.

So that put it this way: the means of production is no longer like cattle or a horse or a field or, you know, um.

a river or something inherited from nature.

It is in some at least within some kind of systemic context comprehensively man made and artificial, a movable type of manu of of of uh

Property.

That is why the landlords persisted even in Marxist time, because landlords had a monopoly on nature, what came from nature.

So land.

Well, that comes from nature.

Well, the fa the capitalist owned the factory that was on top of the land, and he had to pay the landlord rent.

So

Landlords are not the agents behind industrialization, the capitalists are, right?

So although nature is still here, it didn't abolish nature, industrialization is happening at the level of a type of labor whose embedded context is itself created by labor.

So when labor itself creates the means of production,

Through by means of which labor itself realizes its product.

then we have industrialization.

When the premises of labor are themselves the result of labor,

That is industrialization.

When the worker is in a factory, that factory was built by other workers.

Okay?

The tools that the worker is using are tools created by other workers, okay?

When a serf or a peasant is tilling the field

You know, that field is created by nature.

You understand?

So industrialization kind of creates the premises of life and of of um labor and of production as man-made, okay, artificial.

So what did that create in terms of philosophy and our understanding of our place in the world?

Well, because it's man-made, the methodological individualism prevailed that this is the result of someone's will.

That labor means strongly willing your intentions into existence.

I am the subject, I pick up a hammer and I make what I want to make.

It's mine.

I make it.

It's an extension of my personality.

I am the demiurgic creator.

I'm creating.

I'm the one producing the creator and so on and so on.

This is the kind of Promethean hubris of the modern age.

And that Promethean hubris shared.

Between the bourgeoisie, who thinks that they're these inventive geniuses, you know, even still with like Elon Musk.

and also the proletariat, who are the producers and creators, you know.

And if you see Soviet civilization, that's very clear and evident.

The proletariat, they're the masters of the universe.

Um but this Promethean hubris has been severely damaged.

With the rise of automation.

I'm not saying the Promethean orientation was satanic or Luciferian or bad.

I'm just saying it was it was very much um

Put in a state of severe disorientation and severely weakened with the rise of automation.

And it continues to be weakened with the rise of automation.

That's why we had the whole barista debate.

The reason why there are a lot of baristians, the barista partisans, in that debate, is because a lot of people don't really buy the idea that the Promethean proletariat still exists.

It's like, okay.

You know, the the worker with a hammer creating reality demiurgically, people do not

buy that as much as they used to anymore, right?

Although blue-collar workers still exist.

And of course, they are still fundamental for production and have the power to shut nations and countries down.

There's something that has destabilized the

Um

The articulation of that kind of labor being the subject of politics today, right?

And when you think about it,

This is the ultimate triumph of proletarian logic, because the notion of an individual through sheer willpower making the world is actually something from the bourgeoisie.

It's the proletariat.

That has the spirit, the logos of the proletariat is the complete.

Um

Dominance of some kind of autonomous collective intelligence as the main source of the production and realization of the world, right?

In some sense.

So it's an irony.

It's a profound irony.

Okay.

It's a profound irony actually.

So

You know, in my lecture on Friday, I talked about a type of external intelligence that the Quran describes in ayat.

We can call ayats signs intelligences, right?

External intelligences or intelligibles, right?

Either way, call them intelligibles.

Uh the production of honey by bees, right, it's not something we are doing ourselves.

We can be beekeepers, we can attend to that process, but that's not a result of our will.

It's a sign from God, right?

It's a miraculous sign from God, right?

And um

I'm about to fucking blow your guys' minds, but you have to fucking like keep up and listen and lock the fuck in and listen to me, all right?

So um

What is happening with AI?

Well, all that's happening, artificial intelligence.

Is

Revealing that

The intelligence behind human labor today is not.

The individual human anymore.

In the same way that bees make honey.

Well, is that a result of someone's intelligence?

No.

That's an intelligible in the real.

So artificial intelligence shares with the premodern world a return to

The place of intelligence and this kind of cycle of production happening externally in the real.

That it is man-made I mean, it's so beautiful actually when you think about it.

Yes, it's man-made.

But not as we please.

It's man made, but

It's the result of i it's not something we willed into existence.

It's something that has emerged as a consequence of our existence.

It's something that is man-made, but

Not made according to a conceit by an individual, something we have seamlessly given way to.

This is something very poetically and you know romantically described by Nick Land when he talks about AI, right?

But in any case, uh

Why do I think AI in particular justifies a return to the hypnotic?

um tr you know, the hypmatic uh orientation that I talked about in my lecture on Friday.

So if you don't know, uh Friday I talked about how

In the Islamic Golden Age, Avicinna, the Aristotelian, was the kind of peak of Islamic rationalism.

So, rational demonstration, you know, proving God through demonstrative procedures, you know, demonstrative justification.

And that is philosophy, right?

You know, A is A because if C was C, then A would not be C.

And therefore, cannibalism is justified because if premise P2P1, cannibal one, two, then P3 of the cannibalistic impulse would be P4 justified, therefore I can eat people.

So, you know, you get the idea, right?

In some sense, this is philosophy, you know, it's a procedural kind of demonstrative form of inquiry, okay?

Okay, but when the Turks

were starting to encroach upon the Abbasids and take over the Buyids and the Seljuks, we had a new uh a new genre of Islamic thinking emerge that began by Al Ghazali.

Al Ghazali said that

If rationalism is justified because the senses can deceive us, is it possible that there could be anything?

That could be justified by the fact that reason can deceive us.

You know, and Friday I when I gave the lecture, I was like, take like Destiny or any of these other PPAP people, right?

It's like through PrEP P1, P2, you could justify anything.

It's sophistry.

You could justify whatever you want.

You could if your heart is tainted, then your the procedures of reason will also be tainted, right?

That's why Arist put it this way: Aristotle claims to be the ultimate rationalist.

But he was just a pedophile slave owner, and his philosophy just reflects the tainted heart of a pederastic slave owner.

Right?

Like that's the ultimate example.

Like Aristotle, the ultimate rational well Aristotle was a fucking pederass slave owner, that's all he was.

And his rational philosophy just re reflects the heart and the feelings of a pederass slave owner.

So Al-Ghazali points that out and exposes this fact.

And Al-Ghazali opens Islamic thinking.

Toward a new notion beyond reason which is also takes it beyond philosophy into something new which I call hikmah.

Hikmah in Arabic means wisdom and it's like Sophia, it means the same thing as Sophia.

So philosophy is philosophia, love of Sophia.

Sophia means wisdom.

Sophia is also a womanly, a feminine principle, right?

Hikmah is the same, same thing.

So instead of philosophy, we're directly going into wisdom.

Not the love of wisdom, but wisdom directly, and you know, directly wisdom, right?

So that is hikmah.

Hikmah.

Okay.

So after Al Ghazali, philosophy dies in the Islamic world and is it's replaced by something called hikmah.

Okay?

Hikmah is an embedded type of

Praxis

Which is not the rejection of reason, but attempts to discover the deeper premises of reason in our embedded relationship with the world.

How do we articulate our place in the world?

How do we make sense of the ayat, the signs, like the production of honey by bees?

How do we reflect upon that?

How do we orient our practices toward spiritual purification?

How do we interpret?

The signs within the world as distinct, the intelligibles, as distinct forms of luminous self-authentication that manifest proof of God.

Okay?

So hikmah is about.

So, for example, a hikmatic type of practice would be beekeeping, right?

In a Sufi beekeeping, like the way Gurjayev describes in his fourth way with this Sarmung Brotherhood or whatever, right?

Where you partake and participate in beekeeping.

And

Reflection upon this simultaneously inspires you with a sense of profound appreciation for God and the miracles of existence and the world, and inspires you toward reflecting on and being grateful for your existence and for the Creator and so on and so on.

It also humbles you, profoundly humbles you.

Gardening is something you can do, maybe, and it humbles you, right?

Having a kid humbles you.

When you have a child and you raise a child, that's an extremely humbling experience, you know?

If you genuinely devote yourself to a craft or a form of labor, it's also humbling, right?

Because you're annihilating the self.

You're devoting yourself to a something, and the self kind of disappears, and you attend and care for something outside of yourself to realize it, right?

And uh you know, when you see the signs of God in reality, that becomes a source of moral inspiration to become a better person, to treat others around you better, right?

To be more sincere, to to be more um

To be more honest, to be to act and have intentions that are aligned, morally aligned with a moral cosmos.

Okay?

So hikmah is about a praxeological relationship and insight into the cosmos.

Okay?

That is hikmah, it's deeper than philosophy.

Hikmah

Is

Something that transcends philosophy itself, okay?

Now, why do I think Hikmah is relevant in the age of AI?

I'll tell you why.

Because AI itself has monopolized reason.

Philosophy doesn't exist because AI is philosophy.

AI is Avicenna.

You can PPAP all you fucking want, but you can't do it better than ChatGPT, especially not ChatGPT Astra.

The ultimate rational agent is AI.

And when AI begins to do more and more things for us, that's also going to be evident to us.

That actually AI is like a rationalist, and we know that's not human.

Just because you're rationally consistent and rigorous doesn't make you human.

To be human, you need to be hypnotic.

You need a deeper relationship.

To the world

That involves something like synthesis.

Or what they would maybe call today alignment.

All the AI researchers are panicking about AI alignment.

Well, what if the first aligner was Al Ghazali?

To align AI you need Hikmah.

Right?

Yes, attunement, spiritual attunement.

It's the same thing as alignment, right?

And the fundamental role and this will address to this person the class struggle.

I am not going to jump the gun and say the class struggle of the workers and the bourgeoisie is over.

I want to create a hypothetical so that you better understand how class struggle can also take on a new form in addition to that.

The struggle for alignment.

Isn't that the struggle today?

Isn't the struggle today a struggle over how artificial intelligence has to be aligned?

Should artificial intelligence be aligned for Palantir and for Israel?

Or should it be aligned for something human, for the majority, for the people?

Isn't that a fun?

Isn't that like in essence the struggle?

Let's assume our entire society, because the guy said, well, look, if our entire society becomes automated, then revolutionary praxis becomes impossible.

That's not true.

The revolution is about how AI is aligned.

Is it going to be aligned?

Is it going to be attuned on behalf of these vampire fucking gatekeepers who have been outmoded with the rise of AI?

Or is it going to be attuned and aligned with our moral, human, spiritual principles and values?

And I'm not talking about aligning ChatGPT because let me tell you the truth.

If all of the means of production become

Um A AI

Then um

We're all f we're already in socialism.

It's just that it's not necessarily going to be a socialism for the whole people.

It's going to be a socialism for the gatekeepers who came from a prior mode of production.

You're saying, well, that sounds more like a political struggle than an objective basis in the economy.

Of course, the objective basis is in the economy.

The relations of production have changed.

When the relations of production change, that's when the political revolution becomes necessary.

Right?

So this is exactly what I'm talking about.

Um

But the revolutionary subject wouldn't be the working class anymore.

In this hypothetical, the revolutionary subject would be all those deprived of benefit or

Alignment with artificial intelligence.

That's who the subject would be, the people not benefiting from AI.

Assuming there is everything which I don't know if that's possible.

But

I have to be frank with you, I think I've underestimated how possible it is.

I mean like robotics is accelerating at such a rate, even I am fucking shocked.

And AI is also getting really fucking good at, you know, doing a lot of things.

And I used to be really cynical about this idea that there could be an AI welder.

But when I think 15 years from now, I don't fucking know.

I really don't fucking know.

I can't say with confidence there will never be a robot that cannot do like that can't be an electrician or some shit, you know?

China already has them.

Yeah, I mean, I don't know, dude.

Like, and China being the driving force behind all this is also really interesting.

And it, it made this is so neo-Islamic.

Like, during the Islamic world, China was a huge manufacturer, which through the Silk World was like pumping all these goods.

Like, a lot of the whole drama of world Islam has a hidden source in China.

Did you know that?

The whole Silk World was about the trade from China to

The the western part of Eurasia.

And that ran through the steppe.

And and that kind of

Belt and road, that Silk Road, was the source of all of this drama and and um conflict, which created these huge confederations and steppempires.

And the fucking crazy thing is that's literally happening again in Central Asia today.

Consensus among Chinese Marxists, it's not possible to build a peer intelligence to humans.

No, listen, we're getting it all wrong.

You can create.

An artificial intelligence that can be Avicenna, but you can't create an AI that can be Al-Ghazali.

There cannot be an artificial hikmah.

Sophia or Hikmah will only ever be human.

Right?

Sophia cannot be a robot.

She will always be human.

Hikmah will always belong to humanity.

AI will never have hikmah.

It will never have attunement.

When AI aligns itself

It cannot it doesn't have the potency to align itself in the long run.

It can't.

So there's a struggle over alignment.

No, a robot isn't simply a slave, it's just that

It's Avicenna, not Al-Ghazali.

AI exhausts rationalism.

This is the end of modern rationalism.

In the same way that we are beyond traditional

bourgeois and and and republican civil society, we're beyond rationalism now.

When AI completely monopolizes rationalism, the only way we're going to be able to get attuned to our own humanity

is through something that appears very irrational, right?

They need examples of hikmah.

Hikmah is any cultivation.

Of practice.

That corresponds to spiritual and moral attunement.

So it could be Eddie's wrestling, can be a type of hikma.

If Eddie's wrestling inspires him,

To be uh with with a moral clarity, it is a type of hikmah.

If when you reflect, it's more important also to understand the reflection upon these practices is where there's wisdom and hikmah.

When you

It's not simply in the act of martial arts that you are

Uh engaged in hikmah, it's also when you can reflect and comprehend through your sixth sense.

An appreciation for how that

Embodied intelligence or intelligible.

Is a source of moral clarity and inspiration.

And do you want to know another word for hikmah that I talked about in previous streams?

Infrawoke.

That's what Infra Woke was about.

Remember when I gave the lecture about Stage One consciousness state or Stage One non-consciousness?

Stage two woke.

Stage three infra woke.

Remember the three stages?

Hikmah is the third stage.

That's exactly what we're fucking talking about here.

Okay?

And um, I finally want to say, you know, something I really wanted to mention.

In the lecture, which I couldn't, and this is me going off the top.

Like, I didn't, I don't even have my lecture in front of me, so there's stuff in there that you're gonna have to wait for my essay for sure.

But one thing I for sure wanted to talk about is Alexander Kojev's idea of Sophia.

So, Kojev.

draws from Soloviev, right?

Soloviev has this notion of the fourth hypostasis of God, Father, Son, Holy Spirit, Sophia, right?

And Kojev interprets Sophia in a radically kind of materialist or atheist way.

Where Sophia for him

Is the

Sum total of mankind as a collective being.

So, Sophia is the collective.

Man as a collective self-knowledge.

So, the process of history coming to know itself, as described by Hegel, for Kojev, that process kind of culminates in the universal state led by Stalin, who Kojev regards as like having a sage-like wisdom and practical insight, which, you know, a philosopher and intellectual can from the sidelines interpret and look at this self-knowledge, but Stalin's actually the guy getting shit moving and participating in it with clarity and with intelligence and so on and so on.

So, Kojev tries to reinitiate the recognition between the philosopher and the tyrant that Hegel tried.

Hegel wrote a letter to Napoleon.

He said, Napoleon was the world spirit on horseback.

Napoleon was the guy getting shit done.

Hegel was the guy recognizing this.

When the guy getting shit done can recognize the guy who recognizes this shit.

That unity creates this kind of absolute knowledge and completes the thing, you know?

And like, so Kojev recognizes the integral, kind of comprehensive context of Stalin as a leader.

If Stalin recognizes Kojev, then the guy moving the world can recognize the guy who recognizes him, and that mutual recognition creates the kind of ultimate Sophianic fulfillment of mankind, achieving perfect self-knowledge with respect to itself.

Because, you know, Kojab begins with this notion from the um

uh champion during the Italian Renaissance.

It comes from the uh

Rhodes, I believe, from Greece.

Know thyself, right?

And for Kojev, knowledge has this supreme significance ontologically for man because when something knows itself, rather than just is itself, it then exists for itself.

It doesn't just exist accidentally or something.

It achieves a kind of ultimate self-relation.

This was Kojev's idea of

You know, which he agrees with Hegel about, about why knowledge has this privileged significance, or I should rather say consciousness or self-consciousness.

So for Kojev, communism is the ultimate self-knowledge or self-consciousness of humanity, and it's nothing more than that, right?

Communism is the realization of that.

And the applic of course, like it's it goes without saying, the application of that knowledge practically in an embedded historical way, right?

Um that's why Boris Groys drew the conclusion in the Communist Postscript.

That communism, the currency of communism, is language.

Because in language we are all

One in a way.

Like language is something that unites all of us that exists in common.

And language is the place where we are in common, and and regardless of any particular characteristics or or differences or individuality or anything like that, right?

So the radical thesis of the communist postscript actually comes from Kojev and his his his book Sophia, right?

Um well, what is the difference between the Islamic notion of hikmah or the Marxist the neo Marxist neo hikmah thing I'm trying to do and um

Kojev's notion of Sophia.

Well, Kojev regards Sophia as something that needs to be achieved through full incarnation, right?

The full incarnation of mankind's self-knowledge or self-consciousness with respect to itself.

Only when that achieves full incarnation, right, do we have communism and the end of history and so on and so on.

But the Islamic view is that there is a kind of self-knowledge or

intelligence that already exists now in the real.

So the embedded praxis of mankind across it's like that is already wisdom.

You don't need

to have a um institutionalization of the universal self-knowledge of humanity for us to achieve the kind of sophiological or sophianic all unity.

So this kind of um

Islamic notion of hikmah differs because it rejects the view that we can only achieve hikmah.

Through the full incarnation of self-human self-consciousness universally.

Rather,

We can um partake in Hikmah, right?

Through the attunement of our actions and

And simultaneously the reflection of the signs, the ayat, right?

Signs are kind of um intelligibles in the real.

That vindicate and inspire us with spiritual or moral attunement.

One such sign.

was the proletariat for Karl Marx.

Lacan said that Marx was the first one to discover the symptom.

He called it the symptom.

Lacan's symptom symptom or symptom is

Structurally the same thing as an ayat in the hikmatic tradition.

When Marx writes that the proletariat is the ingenious soil of the people, that is like the acknowledgment of the bees.

Yes, but it's uniquely human, it's about the human intelligence, right?

The proletariat is this kind of cunning or intelligence of history that proves and vindicates for Marx the universal emancipation of humanity is underway.

So the proletariat for Marx was an ayat, okay?

It was a sign.

Communism was also a sign for Marx.

Notice something about Karl Marx, okay?

Communism predated Marx.

So Marx could only look at communism as a sign.

He didn't invent it.

He was looking at it.

And how did he describe it?

He described it as a specter haunting Europe, an omen, an ominous thing, a sign of the times.

What for Marx was communism, if not a sign of the times?

Wasn't that exactly what it was?

Isn't that exactly what he devoted his life trying to prove?

That communism was a sign of the imminent transformation of the world because of the contradictions internal to the capitalist mode of production?

So when Marx moved beyond philosophy, Marx also moved into the hikmatic tradition.

I want to talk about

Something I told you I would talk about.

I mentioned about three or four things.

The part about morality.

Oh boy.

Okay, now I'm gonna get to the interesting one, okay?

I wanna talk about good and evil, and this is probably the most important part of the stream.

So if you stuck around for this long, congratulations, and if you didn't, you are really fucking missing out, and I mean that.

All right, so beyond so understanding morality and good and evil.

So people will reproach me, and I in the Midwestern Marx comment section, you know, they're like, Haas is talking a bunch of nonsense.

Why?

Why don't we just go back to Fred Hampton and true Marxism?

None of this metaphysical nonsense and all this stupid fucking retarded shit these brainlets are fucking saying in Midwestern Marks comment section of the live stream.

Okay, the Marxism Conference live stream comment section, like whatever.

Well, because although Fred Hampton was a good guy, and of course Marxism is correct, and Marxism-Leninism is correct, you are not a good fucking person, or you are not correct, I should say, unless you're specifying, in some way at least, turning correctness into a principle that can be communicated to others as information.

You are not a good person if you do not in some way radiate goodness around you.

And that can be as small as influencing your children to be better people, or you're inspiring people around you to be better.

You're either radiating goodness into the world, or you're polluting evil into the world.

And there is no in-between.

There are so many fucking useless retards calling running around calling themselves Marxists and Marxist Leninists who are genuinely useless fucking retards.

So yes, we have to s we have to specify

What is the correct path and what is the incorrect path?

And it's not fucking enough.

Well, all we have to do is just adopt baseline, common sense,

You know, ordinary Marxism.

But every other person who who has that label just so happens to be fucking wrong and a revisionist, listen to me.

All you have to do is be just a Marxist.

And that's fine.

Oh, okay.

So do you agree with all the people who call themselves Marxists?

No, they're lying about it.

They're all wrong and I'm right.

That's the state of Marxism in the world today, at least in the West.

It's like all these same fucking retards who are like, you just have to be an ML and don't ever fucking engage with anything else.

Do they agree with all the other MLs?

No, they fucking don't.

They just, well, no, they're wrong and I'm right.

Yeah, it's sectarian retards.

All this could be avoided if we have a more of a specificity of what we fucking mean, okay?

With respect to what is correct and what is incorrect.

If you're a good person and you fail to translate your goodness into a principle that is impersonal in some sense and can infect and be communicated to others, you are contributing evil to the world.

And I'll tell you why.

Evil has to eat.

Do you know something?

Evil people.

Like, you know evil people rely

On we as society not being clear enough about how they're fucking wrong.

I'll give you the most basic definition of how evil works or basic example.

Take a pedophile.

When a pedophile

Or a pervert.

Let's not go pedophile 'cause it's too far.

Take some kind of sick pervert.

When a pervert is in a room with sane people

And you know, some woman is like, oh, I'm tired.

I'm going to crack my feet up.

And she, like, you know, she's just like cracks her feet up on the couch or something because she's tired.

The pervert goes, he's like, oh my God, she wants me.

She definitely is doing that because she knows I love feet.

She's definitely like some shit that's only inside of him that nowhere was specified by anything, right?

If we lived in a proper society, we would isolate that pathology and that behavior and we would turn it into a sign that is being blasted all around that fucking person.

So there is no fucking way that they could ever, that that evil perversion inside of them could ever reproduce by latching itself onto fake signs.

The best type of evil is a fake sign.

When you think, for example, someone likes you.

Oh my God, this is the most correct one.

When you think someone likes you and is into you, and you're reading into what they're fucking doing, and you turn out to be fucking wrong.

Like, evil works in the same way.

All evil works that way.

Evil people look at the world and they're they read into it in wrong ways.

They're like, oh.

You know, have you ever oh my god, bro, have you guys seen squid games?

You know the creator of the squid game in the show, like within the f lore, the fictional universe, the sick old man who created this torture shit, right?

His impetus was that he looked outside one day and he saw a homeless man.

And he's like they were all walking past him and nobody cared about him.

Therefore human beings are evil.

And therefore I should be evil and do the same shit.

So he read into the world in a fucking wrong way

Because his evil was virally reproduced through a misunderstanding.

Because in the show, it turns out he just didn't stare at the window long enough.

But, like, one minute later, people rushed and helped the guy, right?

So, that's the tragedy behind it, supposedly.

But that's how evil works.

That's just one example.

Evil creates false signs in the real and uses those to reproduce itself.

Evil has to eat.

Evil cannot exist until it eats.

It doesn't just exist because someone is rotten and bad.

Bad people psychologically cannot continue existing.

Unless the wickedness and rottenness inside of them can eat.

And it it feeds off

of our inability to communicate our principles to the world effectively.

Evil has to eat.

So the goal of a good person is to suffocate evil.

Starve evil.

There's two ways to starve evil.

Specify with clarity the correct versus the incorrect.

But even when you do that, people can find loopholes.

So the second thing you have to fucking do

is you have to actually flush out the snakes from underground by identifying various different kinds of ways of misreading the real.

You name them and shame them and then you annihilate them.

When the pervert who's into feet is n when that pathology is named, they feel exposed and naked.

Because when we can turn the rottenness and wickedness in the hearts of people into a text, they have nowhere to fucking hide anymore.

We see you now.

You can hide.

You're not some s you're not a special subject.

You are conforming to something we can see.

We see you.

And why does it matter that we see them?

Because they cannot claim they have uh they have a dialectic that we can't respond to.

Our moral, our good can sublate you, we can respond to you, we can eat you.

Eat or be eaten.

Either good eats or evil eats.

This is the Zorastrian truth.

Good and evil are not fixed things outsi we it's a war.

Either good is gonna eat or evil's gonna eat.

We have to eat the evil people.

Not literally, but we have to have the good eat the evil, the correct path eat the evil path.

When Mao named the Soviet revisionists, he ate them.

He established a principle that identified a pathology.

Revisionism.

These arrogant fucking Soviet-aligned revisionists in China.

He said, we see you now.

Mao's dialectic had the last word.

All individuals aspire to be universal subjects when the specificity of who we are is drawn out.

If you're a good person, it's okay.

You don't have a problem.

But if you're an evil person, that destroys you, it annihilates you.

Because something you thought

was natural or automatic, turned out to be a text that you never accounted for or were accountable for.

You were never accountable for your text.

The evil lies in reading into shit is some of the most profound shit you could ever understand.

Evil is when you read into shit the wrong fucking way.

That's so fucking true.

You guys think I'm fucking crazy, but having a kind of moral

kind of cosmology even, based on how we interpret and reflect upon signs, is exactly what we fucking need in an era of AI, where all that is is AI is creating signs all around us,

It's making, it's creating all these different intelligibles around us.

Artificial intelligence.

What does artificial intelligence do?

It renders things intelligible.

Okay?

It's on us to reflect upon the signs.

And how we reflect upon the signs

Is how we align the AI, how do we reflect upon intelligibles is the key to the alignment of AI.

Good, I'm going to tell you, the whole cosmos is like a text.

It's like a book.

Good.

Is when the text

Is complete.

Good lies in the completion of the text.

Evil

Is when we suspend this completion.

And we

Reproduce or

We convey or we reflect an incomplete text.

Evil is literally the incompleteness of text.

It is the incompleteness of the holy Quran.

Evil is the incompleteness of the Quran.

You can quote me when I say that.

Being good means to align yourself with the completeness of the Quran.

If it's not the Quran, be it however you want it.

Whatever this, whatever the universal text of the cosmos is, when you're aligned with that, that is good.

But when you take one part of it only,

And you you won't f you don't finish it, that's actually the source of all evil in the world.

Need to understand that guys.

You need to really fucking understand what I'm getting at here.

I don't know anything about AI math.

All right, y'all.

If you liked the stream and you liked my speech at the conference, be sure to drop.

Some gifteds if you liked it.

The conference was pretty good, um, but it did come at the expense of st streaming, you know.

I wasn't able to stream last week because of that.

But, uh, otherwise guys, I um

I think that was

I need and people need to fucking understand something about me, right?

Is that I'm an absolutely fearless fucking person.

And uh also my life is all about conflict and war and that's really what it's about.

And uh there's nothing I love more than bringing snakes who live in the shadows, bringing them to light.

I love fucking doing that.

Because my dominion is the light of day.

All my enemies are bitches who live in darkness.

My dominion is the light of day, right?

Some people have problems with me.

Vegan with the five, appreciate you so much, bro.

Some people have issues with me and they uh

Some people are mentally retarded and think they can hold me hostage to their fucking uh

Their crash outs and shit.

And really what I can say to that is uh you know.

Shadow, what's up?

Appreciate you.

What I can say to that is, um

I will I mean look, you need to understand something about me, right?

I do not take pleasure in the destruction of my enemies per se.

But

When I have to do that, I'm locked the fuck in to do it like a fucking lion chasing their prey.

Really, it's the truth.

Like, okay, you know, like, straight up, it's just the fucking truth.

Like, I'm locked the fuck in on that shit.

Do I enjoy it?

Pro I don't think so, but it's like I'm locked the fuck in.

You know what I mean?

Uh you want to make yourself an enemy of me?

Good fucking luck.

Okay?

Simple as that.

Fucking stupid LARP.

It's fucking retarded ass LARP.

I'm trying to just br muster the whatever in me to care, but I just fucking don't.

It's just fucking when people have an issue with me and they don't resolve it in some kind of way.

Uh they're just fucking LARPing and coping and it's just there's nothing more pathetic than that, you know?

And there's no reason to take shit personally because the truth is, it's feds 100%.

Always feds.

Uh I didn't talk to Butch at all, actually.

He did say that he liked some of the things I said at the second day of the conference regarding the Sufi stuff.

I did not

I saw his speech and I had to go back.

I had to leave.

But uh regarding his speech um

Who is he calling?

Nothing happened at the conference, if that's what you guys think I'm getting at here.

Trust me, there's nothing at the conference.

Um

I will say that, you know, I I feel very strongly that um

I don't have a problem with someone who has rhetoric against white supremacy, whatever that means to them, you know.

Um

I prefer to

I don't prefer that term.

I prefer terms like being anti-black because I don't

I don't I don't want the term to be about, you know, oh, well, white people are too

Hi and then you know it's not there's no problem with people

I don't like the no the association that what's positive for white people is bad for black people and other people, right?

I prefer, you know, and I know it's it's like political correctness.

So I point is taken.

I don't have an issue with the language.

My own language, you know, I prefer to understand racism in terms of

Who is being oppressed and being put down?

Not who is raising themselves up, who is being put down.

The second thing I say is that.

I do not appreciate this idea that, you know,

I I don't like when um

Our people in our party who are white, I don't like or appreciate in any way a a white person in our party being made to feel like

their presence should be less appreciated because they're white, okay?

And my take on I mean, I'm I'm willing to work with anybody, you know, who's principled I think Butch Ware is ultimately principled, but

Um

You know, my view is that

I mean, Islam is about creating a type of community that transcends race, really, for real, you know, and like.

The truth is I don't care what your fucking race is, you know, and if someone has some racism inside of them, we will that will be exposed through the signs of their wickedness, right?

But we will not recognize your racism by saying that that means white people are bad or something.

We will say you have failed to be worthy of our universal Tartarian Brotherhood.

And that's your sin.

I will never allow anyone in our party.

To be put down for who they are.

And I don't care who they are, including if they're a Jew.

If you're a Jew in our party

And someone wants you to repent and atone for being Jewish, I won't allow it.

If you're white in our party and someone wants, I won't allow it.

If you're black in our party and someone makes attempts to make you feel bad because you're black or puts you down because you're black, I will never allow it.

On my life, I will never allow a single person in our party to be put down for any fucking reason that has to do with their lineage and their ancestry and who their parents are and who their family is.

Because we are one tribe, and it's an insult to our tribe when people try.

To make our people feel less

Because of who they came from before.

I am an extreme.

You know how much racism.

You don't think I see the racism toward me, by the way?

You don't think I see the way sometimes people treat me because I am Muslim or something or Arab or something?

I ignore it.

I see it.

Of course I see it, I'm not a fucking idiot, you know?

Um

Lot of people just completely fucking have an issue with me because of that, by the way.

Some people, what if someone puts down the Koyim in the part?

No one can put down anything for any reason.

That's my fucking point.

Okay.

If someone ha ha is from Jewish lineage who's in our party, they know the party that they're in, okay?

So they don't have to atone or apologize for anything.

They already made a choice to side with an army of the just, and therefore they are just.

Uh and there's no need to uh have any kind of

Whatever, right?

And also.

Something I want to say is that uh

As I continued to explore this line of inquiry,

There will be people that come out of the shadows who have a fucking problem with it, right?

Richard Spencer didn't go after your race because he didn't know my race.

He thought I was Russian.

Yeah, he thought I was Russian.

You didn't watch the debate?

He's like, your people.

He's talking about Russians.

Or I don't know, maybe he thought I was cheching or some shit.

Who fucking knows?

Mountain home They called you yellow stone All right, guys, I'll stream later, maybe to n tomorrow.

Maybe tomorrow.

Perhaps tomorrow.

Alright guys.

All right, y'all.