Stomp on all snake bitches
2026-09-07T02:58:59+00:00
I'm ha'haq, yeah,
Yeah, haq, yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah.
Yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq, Yeah Haq
Yeah
Yeah
Ha Ha Ha Yeah
Yeah
Ha Ha Ha Ha
Yeah Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Ha Ha
Ha God God I I I I I Yeah, a quack. Watt's inkir, there's a greek, there's a, here, Chiflow, Musa.
Manatur, a book,
Yalam and a haqqqqqa,
jabas, tarikad.
Allah, Allah.
They're
They're not,
they're they're
They're
They're
They're We, Muslims They're They're We're
We're human
Our people
Our people
Zunders,
Look,
Saldry,
We're,
We're all right
We're in Muttalah is
I'm in
God,
Inhtrae
Inh,
Allah,
Zipm,
Allah,
Thirm,
Allah,
Inthrym,
Allah, in my mind in allah in love in love in love
in love
in love
God in
God in
God in
God in God God God God God
God
Muhammad God God God
Allah Allah Allah Allah Lord Muhammad, Sall Allah, there is Allah, there is Allah,
my God,
God,
my God, God,
my heart
my heart God, God God God
God,
Allah, God,
Allah, Allah,
God and God and I sallah, la ira, allah, allah, allah.
This is an adect,
and aeckhamed, and,
a tecate.
Allah, Allah.
This a hat-intihang,
satan,
satas-itifat.
Allah, Allah.
Guernalda'uvela car, y, but an an an a Sayas' Intifat. Allah, Allah. Gullmied,
Da'lara car,
yeah, but an an an an
assla,
SELA,
SETMas,
Sucur,
with you must must
say,
your heart-attachin'all,
Allah,
un'u'-Styll'er,
they're,
they're, they're, more than,
they're
This life passamack And There's God, In my name in Allah Fiprinda Allah
Firm in
Allah in
Allah in
God in
God in love
Allah
Allah, Allah,
Allah,
Allah,
Allah, Allah,
Allah,
Allah, my
my
my
God God God Muhammad Sallah Allah Allah God, not in my heart of God.
Lord Muhammad, Sall Allah, there is Allah, there Allah, there is God Allah.
God my God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God God God. No, Muhammad, Sallah, God. No, no, Allah,
there's no,
Allah,
there's my
God,
Allah, my
my my
my God
God,
God,
God,
Allah, God, there Sall Allah, there's no, Allah, no, Allah, God, my God, Jall, Allah,
I be in God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God. sallelah there Allah Allah Allah
Allah Allah
God Allah
God Godha and I-Hara forkillah Allah Yeah Yeah, ha ha ha ha, you know, yeah,
yeah,
yeah,
yeah,
yeah,
a securvae
and I'm
there,
but I'm
Rima, Allah,
Allah,
every a chere and
estalach ban, Bangeb Bail La, Every year, It'stilaf, Shere and Istile Bence
A L'Lah,
Allah
God
In fact
The Kittap
Mouda Moudache
Flow Musa
Mannart
God The
Hattikat Hatt God
And
Allah Allah They They're They Y'all and a Haqqa, Cabas, Tahrikad. Allah,
Allah.
You know,
cause,
they're, they're
like,
they're
people people,
we're Muslims,
our
think, but
we what I
we're
we're we're in inala is. We're in-ah, in-all-ah, God-Dim-A-Lah,
Zintu-Ned, Allah, in-Law-N-A-Lah,
in-Lah, in-Hu-N-N-A-Lah,
in-Hu-N-B-Hu-Lah.
God-Buh-Bah! My God, God's by God be God,
not in my heart
my heart
God,
Lord Muhammad
Sallah,
there's Allah, there's Allah,
no,
Allah,
Allah,
God,
God,
God,
God, God,
God,
God, God, God, God be God Allah not in God
God
Muhammad
Sallah
Allah
No
Allah
Allah Allah Allah God
I'm
Gabbett
and
Tecate
and God
Allah and God and If they're in-cambet, and tecare Allah, Allah
This life-intihang,
Teethan's an intikam,
Sayous itifat,
Allah, Allah,
Guvind, Daal-A-Law-Yan,
but,
Allah, never,
Sainte-Salt-Mas Think-Cul-L-L-l-l-l-l-l-h-hick-l-l-lap- never say you sat-mast you should think you
should be
with
calm-l-clad
you're
all-all-all-
yeah
people-all-all-
bin'-eck
they're more-gen-
they're
in the
life-pass-mack-
chur-lid-
styrh
from
an estir-hams
devam
and Perdin'er, Sending a Istire A styrharm Devamly Yes,
Aught
God
In my
Inni
Inni Inna
I'm
Inna God
I'm Inflin
Allah
In
In In God
In
God In God God God God in God, actually, Allah,
God,
God,
God,
God,
my
in my my heart
my heart God,
God,
Nul Muhammad
Sallah,
Allah,
Allah, Allah, Allah,
Allah,
Allah, Ah, God, God, God, God, no, Allah, God. God's by God my God, God's God in my heart of God.
No, Muhammad, Sallel Allah.
No, I love God, God, God, God's God God in my heart my heart my by my God my God's God.
My God's
God
God
God God, God, Allah, what in my
in my God
God, Lord of
Lord
Allah Allah
there
Allah Allah
God
Allah
God
God
God God God
God
God God God God God, What in my in the My heart Muhammad Yeah, ha'a haq, yeah, ha'n, yeah haq, yeah' haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haqt, y'aq, yeah, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, Wattes, a zikir-var, there's aeim bar,
Besslenir iman,
Allah, Allah,
all,
everywhere,
chirre istilah,
bian,
a liman,
Allah,
God,
a book,
a
Ruhb, bud, a ch, flow, Musa, Real check the kitap's In the Quran Curban, Here's
Here's
Mousa
Manartar The Hatt
Thealam
And
God
Allah Allah
They're
They're
They're
They're They're
They're
They're They They're, They're They're
We're
Muslims, Our
Our Our We're
We're We're
We're
We're
We're We're We're We're
In
God
In
God
In
In In In In
In
In In In I In I God, in God, in God, in God, in love in, Allah,
God, in, God, God, God in God in God in God, God in God God.
God, God, God God God God.
No, Muhammad, Sallel, No, I'll Allah,
No, Allah,
I'm in my
God, Allah,
my
my heart God
God, God
God
Allah,
Allah,
no
Allah, Allah, la, Allah,
Allah,
Aulana a
Da'a-i-a-qa-a-
And,
Tecate,
Allah, Allah.
This life-the-the-the-cha'
Intifetime,
Hat-Sys-Sys-Itifat
Allah,
God, God, God, God, I think of Highest, it's It's aft Allah God
Gurned GER God
But God
God God
never
Sauts Sart
You
think You should keep
You
you
and your and
your and God
Yes
they're,
more gencese,
they're,
who ha'ypac-pass-mack and shirut
merdi-ver
and then
a-isdiham,
devangly instiapar
and, in
life in
in my
in my
sinned, in my in my fictr in
in my minding
in my heart of
Allah,
Allah,
Assumdha,
Allah,
Allah,
Allah, God in Allah
my in my
my hearti
Godi Godu my in my God
God
God
God
God
Allah God
God God God God God God God God God God God
God God God God
God
God God God God. No, my God. No, Muhammad, Sallel, Allah.
No, I'll Allah, no
Allah.
My God, God,
God, God, God,
my God,
my heart my God,
God,
God,
God,
God, there is God. Lord of Muhammad Sall Allah No,
Allah, there
Allah
God
God
God
God
God God God God God God God Muhammad, Sall Allah, there's no Allah,
Allah,
God
Allah
God Yeah, fuck we go and all right. You know, Yeah
Huck
Yeah Yeah, ha haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq Yeah, haq Yeah,
Yeah, ha
Yeah,
Yeah,
ha
You're
I'm I'm
I'm
Rihemann
Allah
Allah, H'rier
Aft
Chirbigh Istila Yeah It's a chirre-istilah
Benge a big liman
God
GERC
God,
Bhop,
Moodach,
flow musa,
Manartar
The Hatt
The Lack Cat
Yalam and Hakikar
Cabbas, tarikad.
Allah, Allah.
You know,
as,
they,
they're not, they
they
they're people people
We,
Muslims,
our
our our, just
we we
we're we we're in we we're in in Sust nisandr, look, You know, We's rabbe Muddbe meddalah is
In myrrh,
God,
In my name in
Allah,
Allah,
Sintrumprida,
Allah,
Inthrumbe,
Allah,
Inla, Allah,
in my heart
Inla,
Allah, Allah, in love,
God,
God,
God in
God in God. God. God, God. God, God.
No, my in my
my
God's my
God
God, Allah, God
Allah, Allah,
God,
God,
God, God, God, God, God, Allah My Godi
Allah In my
God
Muhammad
Sallah
Allah
No
Allah Allah Allah Allah
And then
An
Gavette I'm
Tachachire
And Allah And God And Let's Inf's a khamet And the tachyre Allah
Allah This life
Intihan
Thayton
Hat Hat
It's
It's
God God God God
God
God
God
God God God Sanna
Saut
You
sattm
You
think you you
you you
you
I'm But Allah, Asla, You never SETAW Thinks You must
You should You You You shirut merdivens, Sending a-ih TIRHAM Devand-a-istairthar
Gereken,
I'm gonna,
Allah,
in my name in-
God,
Siphinde,
Allah, Thu-N-D-Lah,
Thirl in,
in my heart-mina,
Allah,
Allah,
Assum-ha, Allah,
God,
God,
God God,
God,
my my
my God, God God God
God
God, God
Allah,
Allah, Allah
Allah, Allah
Allah, God, Allah.
God's by God my God's God, God's
God in my heart of God's God.
Noob Muhammad,
Sallel Allah.
No,
Allah,
God,
God,
God, God, God, God, God, no, Allah, God's by God my God's my God, God's my in my
God's God.
Lord of Muhammad Sallelah, God.
No, I love, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, Allah, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God, God,
Lord of God, God, God, God, God, God,
God
Muhammad Sallah
God Yeah, haq, yeah, haq, yeah, yeah, haq, yeah,
haq, yeah haq, yeah haq, yeah haq. Yeah, haq. Yeah, haq.
Yeah, haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah haq.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You're a little I'm Yeah, ha ha haq, yeah, Yeah, haqt'r
There's sikir'il'a'i'l,
But'nir iman
Allah, Allah
Every-here-itilaf,
Shire and istilah
B'rata,
B'em'u'am
A'u-A-Lah,
God'
This Quran, Curba, this Quran, Purba,
this
Frou, Mousa,
Manhat
the
Hatt-Kitap, Yalam
and haqqqq
chabas tarikad
Ha'ah,
Allah, they're
they, they
they
they they're they they're like they they they like they're
we're
Muslims
our
our things
us
us
us nizanzer
back
I'm
we're
we're we're
in
we're in
we're in
Allah
tinn's
in
Allah
Zintr
in
Allah
in
in love in love in love in love in love in my life in love in love my heart me jallelah my heart my heart my heart my heart i love my love my love my god God. Lord, Muhammad Sall Allah
God
Allah, there
Allah
God God
God
God God God
God God
God
God
God
God
God God God Allah God God Muhammad Sallah Allah Allah Allah Allah
Allah
This
A man
Aulah
Aikamet
And the
Cahat
And Tecate God God
That's
It's
Inticham
Hat Hat
It's Intifat
Allah God God God Gurned God Gurned Dall Garn satan's intifat and thinectah allah
God,
God,
God,
but an an
assla
Sanna
sarkmone think
you're
you're allmall
and
assin' heart-attach and
God
Allah, gina Final est,
They're More,
They're You're You're God In my shimde Allah In the Inna Inna
Inlety
Allah
Inflintry
Inla
Inla
Inna Allah
Inh
God in
God in
Allah
God in
God in
Allah
Allah God Allah
Mybhi
Allah
My
God God Allah Nau Nuh Muhammad God be Godfrey, God's God, my in my my heart of God
God.
No, Muhammad
Sallah
Allah,
no, Allah, Allah
God God God God
God
God,
my in
God
God God
God God God no, my in my heart God. No, Muhammad,
Sallel,
there's no
Allah,
no,
God,
God,
God, God,
my in my
God,
God,
Lord,
Lord, Muhammad Sallah Allah, God, God, No, Muhammad, Sall Allah,
there
Allah, there
God
God Nour of Muhammad, Sall Allah, there's no,
I love.
I'm asking of my God,
Jallel, Allah,
not in my hearty,
God,
God,
God,
Lord of God,
God,
God,
Allah,
Allah, Allah,
Allah, Allah Allah
God Tartaria, our landtartaria, we greet Tartaria. Our land Tarteria We greet Tarteria
Our land Tarteria
Mountain Home
They called you Yellowstone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tartaria
Arlan Tartaria
Be free Tartaria
Al Antareria
Mountain home
They called you Yellowstone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tararia
Our land Tarteria Be free Cartelia our land Carteria
Be free Carteria
Our land Carteria
Mountain Road
They call to Yellow stone They call to yellow stone
And through the ice and snow
Will make you proud again
Tartaria
Our land
Tarrier Be freed our land tartaria be freed Mountain hope They call to
Yellowstone
And through the ice
And slow
We'll make you proud again
Tarteria
Arlan Tarteria Our land Tarteria
Be free Tarteria
Our land Tarteria
Mountain Hole
They called you yellow stone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tartaria
Our land Tartaria Arland Targary
Be free
Tartaria
Haaland Tartaria
Mountain Hole They call Eury Mountain hole
They called you yellow stone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tarteria Ourland Tarteria Haaland Tarteria
Be free Tarteria
Haaland Tartaria
Mountain Hole They called you the yellow stone and through the ice and snow we'll make you proud again
Ontario Island again Tarterian
Arlen
Tarterian
Arlen
Tarterian
Alain
Tartarian
Al
Al Tartarian
Tartarian
Mountain home they call Tarteria Mountain Hold
They called you the yellow stone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tartaria make you proud again Tarteria
Allent Tarteria
Be free Tarteria
Allent Tarteria
Mountain Hole Our land Tar sotero Mountain hole
Mountain hole
They call you
Yellow's glow
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud
again Tartera We'll make you proud again
Tarteria
Arland Tarantaria
Ireland be free
Tararia
Al
Al I am Mediterranean
Mountain home
They called you yellow
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tarterian
Ar, uh,
Arlen Tarterian
He be freed
Tarterian
Uh
Arlan Tarian Locked in Har Terrier Oh Allent Ontario
Locked
Holy
Counting
They call
you yellow
And through the
ice and snow
We'll make you proud again.
Tarteria, our land Tarteria,
be free Tarteria,
Our land Tartarian
Mountain hole
Mountain hole
They called you
Yellowstone
And through the ice and snow
we'll make you proud again
Tartaria
Arlen Tarteria
Be free Tarania
A land
Take me up
Mountain home
They called you
Yellowstone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tarteria
Ah, Al and Tarania
Be free tartaria
Or a lentataria
Mountain home
They call you yellow stone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you proud again
Tarteria
I'll land Taroteria Be free to talk I'm an antaritalia
Be free
tartaria
I are lentartagnetia
Mountain home
won't they call you Yeah and the Mountain home They called you
Yellowstone
And through the ice and snow
We'll make you
Brock again
Tartaria
On land Tartaria Tarania Alentataria Alentataria
Be free
Tartaria
Alentataria
Mountain Horn
may call you Yellowstone mountain hall
may call you yellow stone
and through the ice and soul
will make you proud again
tartaria than tartia Tartaria
I'm then
Tartaria
Be free
Tartaria
I'm than Tartaria
Hey
I'm known to who and... And... Cartaia,
Arlandticaria, be free Tartaria Be free Tartaria Oh, I'm going to be. Oh my.
I don't know. and the other and the other my
and
I'm I'm not
I'm
and I'm a lot of it. I'm not going to be a lot of rest of you know.
I'm going to go.
I'm a man.
I'm a man.
I know.
And I'm going to be a lot. I'm not. I'm I'm
I'm
I'm I'm not going to be able to be.
I'm not
a lot
I'm and
I'm going to
I'm not going to be able to be. I'm not
I'm
and
I'm uh, I'm not going to be. I'm not going to be.
I'm going to be a new.
I'm going to be. Midwest with the 10. What's going on, bro?
Wallow with the 10. What's going on, bro? How are we doing?
What the fuck is up, y'all?
Fuck is up, everybody.
What are we doing?
So maybe you have, maybe you haven't seen my speech at the Marxism conference on Friday.
It did not go as long as I wanted it to.
Unfortunately, thank you.
What's up?
I went really long.
I was supposed to deliver a 45 minute speech. I thought
I could meet the 45 hour mark
but like it was like I don't know
70 minutes and I still wasn't even
halfway through so I jumped right to the conclusion
but
guys tell me how you feel about the light
by the way. Do you like it how it's darker me how you feel about the light, by the way.
Do you like it
how it's darker
or do you like
the old light set up?
Because I kind of
don't want it to be so bright
because I don't,
you see how I don't wear the sunglasses
because it's actually at a reasonable brightness.
You like the brighter one?
Okay,
we'll see.
Um a reasonable brightness. You like the brighter one? Okay, we'll see. Anyway, y'all,
anyway, y'all.
Yeah, if you saw the Marxism
conference, then you'll
know that I gave an incomplete
speech. It wasn't actually finished and uh you know
we probably need to follow up and talk more about that shit right right right right i mean i don't
even know if you all saw that
Marxism conference anyway,
but in any case, let me tell you guys something.
I'm going to say some real-ass shit.
In the Midwestern Marx comment section
in the live stream that they did,
genuine fucking retarded brainlets.
And I'm starting to get a conspiracy in my head.
I'm starting to have this fucking idea
that the people who take issue with this Islam revolution,
the revolution of the East,
the Tartarian Revolution,
the Islamic Revolution,
these are a bunch of fucking bitches,
corrupt enemies of humanity.
And I stomp on them like I stomp on fucking snakes.
You understand?
There's a revolution happening in the air i want to be fucking frank about what's going on
there's a revolution happening okay those of you who are in our party you know there's a revolution
going on in our party in our american communist party there's a
revolution happening in the party there's a revolution happening in the world there's a revolution
happening in the productive forces with the rise of AI there's a revolution
happening in the world order with the end of the u.s empire at every level we are living in the time of the auspicious conjunction we are living in a time
of turmoil revolution and change and absolutely i will guide you through this fucking era i will guide you through this
fucking era gladly you understand i'm not telling you i'm not telling you i'm not telling you. I'm not telling you.
To conjure up an inspiration inside of you in order to muster what it fucking takes to follow me through this shit.
What I am telling you is to speak to the inspiration that already fucking brought you here in the first place
soberly and honestly
and trust it
trust your fucking gut instinct
and fucking go with it
and once you establish that fucking trust
you blindly you blindly follow through this revolution
to its final and fullest conclusion you bet your fucking ass is at the center of this revolution
is at the center of this revolution. Islam, AI,
the resurrection of world communism.
These are the things that are happening in the world if you have some fucking eyes to see them.
There's something happening in the world today.
Islam, AI, the rise of central asia the rise of communism the specter of history haunting the world.
I'll guide you through this era.
I'll guide you through it.
But in order for me to guide you through it,
you need to identify the counter-revolutionaries.
You need to identify these fucking infidels am i an unreasonable fucking person i'm not a i don't
force religion on anyone that's not what this is about okay what this is fucking about is very
simple that the shit i'm saying is so compelling, so fucking convincing,
okay, that it's causing people doubt inside of them. It's causing them to fucking have an
existential fucking crisis because of how fucking true it is. Do you understand? And in order to combat
this truth within themselves, they're
fucking coping. They're coping. They're crashing
out. They're trying to move against
me, all this kind of shit. Here's
what I have to say to these fucking people.
I operate in the light of fucking day,
you bitch. You understand? This is an
Islamic revolution. This is not the old testament. This is not the old era. This is the
Islamic revolution. I live in the light of fucking day on the surface.
On the surface of the fucking text.
Do you understand?
This is exoteric.
I'm bringing the esoteric to the exoteric.
Do you understand there is nobody on earth more who will dwell and feast in the light of day than me bitch every fucking snake every fucking snake burrowed underground hissing and bullshitting.
I will flush you the fuck out into the light of day and I will stomp on your bitch ass.
You understand?
You need to understand what this Islamic revolution is going to entail.
A lot of people aren't going to be happy with it.
But there's going to be, you know that Sufi videos where they're fucking swarming in a circle like that, right?
Where they're fucking moving in a circle, swarming.
That's the type of shit
we're gonna fucking be on.
You're gonna be with the swarm
or you're gonna be crushed underneath,
bitch. That's what we're fucking going
forward with. We
are the horde.
Yes, we are that.
That's the type of shit that we're on.
We got no patience, no tolerance for special little personalities,
fucking millennial crashouts,
and other fucking bitches that want to get in the fucking way of our cyclone, bitch.
This is a fucking cyclone.
It's a fucking tornado.
You either go with it or you get caught up in it.
Either fucking way it's having its way through this shit i want to be crystal
fucking clear the audacity i don't give a fuck by the well but this is america and in america people are i don't give a fuck. Oh, but this is America. And in America, people are, I don't give a fuck, bitch.
This is happening.
I don't give a fuck.
You understand?
Oh, but hey, hey, listen, listen.
Listen, look at me.
Look at me now.
I am the American now.
Do you understand?
Do you understand what this means?
The totality, the integral totality of the all.
Can't? totality of the all cannot be resisted or avoided you cannot resist integration you cannot you can't there is nothing you can do to to prevent what else can we call it except jihad
you can't stop the jihad you can't
stop it it's a tornado
it's a cyclone it's a natural
force of history it will
move regardless
of anyone's regardless of anyone's feelings, of anyone's.
And by the way, if you take your feelings to the logical conclusion, you will arrive at this position.
If you take your your even your thoughts
that come willy-nil you know the problem
with people acting on their fucking thoughts
and their feelings
I'll tell you why people who act on their feelings
and thoughts 99% of the time are fucking retards scumbags because they don't even sit down and take time to cultivate their thoughts and their feelings. Whatever they shit out in the moment, they shit out onto us and we have to fucking care about it, right?
But they don't ever reflect on it.
They don't ever cultivate.
And what does that mean?
That means why do communist parties hate individualists?
Because usually when an individualist is shitting out their immediate feelings
and thoughts and ideas
they're just recycling
and absorbing exactly what they're getting
from the bourgeois hegemony and
shitting it out lazily
and that's why
we have no fucking patience or tolerance for it you know i'm sure in a communist society
being an individualist spontaneously that's totally fine because what you're the end you're breathing
and in a communistic environment where goodness prevails and where the snake of evil is fucking being suppressed and stomped onto the fucking ground. You understand? So it's completely different.
But alas, alas, I need to talk to you guys about something very serious, right?
I have to remember because I took notes for this fucking stream.
Actually, I took notes in this stream.
Okay.
So, okay, you got that one. Okay. Okay. So, okay, you got that one.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
I know the type of shit that world.
All right.
Listen to me, y'all.
ChatGBTGBT.
Just came out with the most powerful AI model that the world has ever seen.
ChatGBT, GBT, 6, Astra.
Okay.
And it's got us thinking about a lot of fucking things, okay?
It's got us thinking about a lot of fucking things which is
you know recently i heard recently that even drones
drone pilots are being automated now so the fucking drones are going to be
happening with ai right
so going to be happening with AI, right?
So I want us to ask a very simple fucking question.
What is this?
Why are all these things happening at the same time?
Why coincidentally with the rise of AI is Islam blowing up in the world okay I mean because it is it's like a it's where it's acquiring an even newer renewed significance than it
it ever fucking has ever had right we are all becoming islamicate and it all comes down to labor and the
proletariat and if you look at the writings of the black panthers in amer, that will actually help you fucking clarify
where we're at in terms
of why all these things are converging together in a way.
And if you, once you fucking see it,
you cannot fucking unsee it.
Okay.
So strap the fuck in.
Because I gave that lecture at the Marxism conference, I didn't have enough fucking time.
Now I have some fucking time.
Okay.
So I got a lot of shit I want to talk to you guys about and reflect
regarding that that i didn't have time to at that time you understand first of all. I made the comment before that Muslims are lazy.
Islam is a very leisure-centric culture civilization.
Even Marx talked about this when he was in the cafe in Algeria, right?
Amila, what's up with the 10? Appreciate it.
They don't have the Protestant work ethic.
They don't have that.
But I wonder if that is actually more correct and that we're missing something about what work actually fucking is.
Okay.
And I want to just forget about Islam for one second, all right?
Go to the writings of the Black Panthers.
Eldridge Cleaver was a horrific scumbag
He was really fucked up
Like a really fucked up guy
But I think he's the one who wrote about this
And this became the official view of the Black Panther Party
So the 60s and 70s is when automation started happening on a mass scale when it came to factory automation.
Actually, it wasn't recent.
The rise of the use of automation and robots and shit, that was happening in the 60s and 70s okay
and that played a huge role in the process of deproletarianization okay and the rise of lumpinization
the black panthers came to a theory where they basically said that because of the rise of
automation and the rise of mass unemployment and the rise of the lumpin that the lumpin were now the revolutionary subject okay
the lumpin are the revolutionary subject this is a conclusion the black panthers came to
and then i started thinking about some shit.
Were they actually talking about the lump in love?
We need to start thinking in big ways in a hypothetical way, okay? Because I think I've underestimated AI in a lot of ways, and the scary thing is that robotics is on the horizon.
Skeletal humanoid robotics is on the horizon.
And if you think AI is not going to be powerful enough, it's like the problem is
AI agent paradigm.
Like AI actually can get to a point probably where some physical labor can be done by AI.
I doubted that this was going to be possible.
Just years ago, I doubted it was going to be possible.
But it's going to be possible much sooner than you fucking think it is.
Okay.
There's not a single type of employment or work that is done manually that I can think of that cannot be automated with AI.
The only thing is the energy cost maybe or something, but we're getting there very quickly okay much
sooner than you fucking think okay so that's why it's worth returning to the black panther party and what
they were writing about in the 60s and 70s and thinking about what the fuck the black panther party actually
fucking was okay so and delos and guitary actually overlap with them on certain points so they
mentioned something called the lumpin the lumpin were people that were unemployed.
They were basically outside of proletarian industrialized labor.
And they were thrown off into the desert or the step, if you will, of civil society.
Now, maybe you know where I'm
getting at now, okay? The lump in that Marx and Engels talked
about were people that were immediately
declassed from their prior class status, usually pre-capitalist and pre-modern in nature.
And we're this kind of excess that could not be or didn't want to be, agree to be, proletarianized, and shows up becoming these kind of dregs of
society who just robbed, who just stole, who just, it wasn't so much that they were outside of
the law as much as it was that they were just completely outside of civil society in any capacity
and that they would they they were reactionary because they were still attached to the now outmoded
mode of production okay this is what gave them their reactionary quality because they were declassed and they never
transitioned into new relations of production.
So they occupied this liminal space more or less, which, you know, was a kind of psychosis of civil society, really, you know, if you think about it. But in any case, the process that the Black Panthers were responding to and witnessing in the time that they lived in
was a lot different okay uh you don't just have in this case lumpinization because how can we speak of
being declass?
I mean, Noah, who is at the Marxism conference,
he coined the term reprolitarianization.
And he, although I don't think automation is the main focus of his theory. It's an acknowledgement of the fact that the
dynamic of proletarianization, de-proletarianization, re-proletarianization, this somehow happens after the capitalist relations of production become dominant.
Okay, so that's really fucking interesting, actually, when you think about it.
Okay. so there was a point at which the proletariat was deproletarianized but you can't say this is lumpen
because they're not descending from a prior mode of production and being declassed they're
occupying an and an uncharitable unmappable space, outside of civil society, yes, but not quite attached to any
mode of production or any prior mode of production. So this is a kind of post-historical subject that the black panthers were dealing with the mass of the
unemployed so to speak right the subject of the black panther party well the mass of the
unemployed we should call them the nomadic proletariat, which is what Deleuze and Gattari were talking about.
They had a tendency not just to be criminals, but to form alternative gangs with their own laws and codes of
honor and ways of regulating life well you can call them gangs but in history
maybe those kind of people would have been called tribes
and these lumpin that were the subject of the black panther party you could try to call them lumpin, but are they really necessarily attached to crime?
Or is it maybe that they have moved beyond the civil society of bourgeois civilization and now are akin to something
that in history we call nomads neo nomads nomads are people who carry the law with them where they go they're not lawless they're not criminal necessarily
although there's a lot of wild nomads that are but in a state of disorder nomads are stealing from
each other they're killing each other and they're forming the law as they go until a tribal conqueror or a unifier, I should
say, comes and initiates a kind of revolutionary unity among the nomadic peoples, establishes
a new law, a new code of honor that regulates how they interact with each other and unifies the step or the desert. So this is the prophet of Islam. This is Genghis Khan. This is the Cyrus the great
The founder of the Akame
Every founder of every empire
Began that way by the way
Okay
Moses
Abraham
Well
Doesn't that make you think about the black panthers a little bit differently
what if fred hampton who was brokering peace between what we call gangs we call him gangs
but really if we were looking at a long-term
view of history we would call those tribes
they were tribes
he was brokering peace between the tribes
he was unifying the tribes
the black panthers were unifying the tribes. The Black Panthers were unifying the tribes.
Doesn't that make some fucking sense?
And you can call him Lumpin and whatever, but how can we take the notion of the lumpin from the 19th century and say this is what describes the deindustrialized kind of post-industrial civilization that did not exist during the time of Marx and Engels whatsoever.
Okay?
I mean, these formations are not only outside the law, they transcend the law. These types of associations are literally the only real law that exists in the world, in America.
You think in America the law is dominant?
No, it's not.
Go to any prison and tell me the law is dominant in prison.
No, it's the law of the gangs that dominates in prison.
Okay, well, at least in you know outside of prison
in normal civil society outside of criminality the law dominates no it fucking doesn't you think
that the federal agents give a shit about the law no they give a shit about their gang leader
laura luma they're part of some gang some factions something some subtext that makes them
some texture of of law that is above the one that's we have on the books formally.
This is a nomadic space.
Just like on the step, on the step, on the frontier.
You think there's any laws on the frontier?
No.
The law is the law of the tribes that's the only thing that exists
and this is the reality grand theft auto type of shit what if grand theft auto is not about lumpin what if grand theft auto is not about lumpin?
What if grand theft auto is like grand theft horse?
The same step barbaric context that endangered the necessity of the prophet Zoroaster.
You know, Zoroaster's whole thing was that
people were stealing
cattle and horses and shit like that
on the step.
Why is it that when you play Grand Theft Auto
4 or something, the only one I played,
why do we get these stories of like this is an epic?
Like there is some kind of honor here.
Hip hop music in America and hip hop culture in America, black hip hop culture in America, movies, culture, TV, whatever, are these a bunch of depraved, lawless criminals, or are these complex groups, whether they're gangs or something, that have a code of honor honor where an epic involving some sense of morality
and the meaning of life is present and like it's considered some real ass shit like this is the
human story this is where it fucking is you know that's why they say on some real
shit not some fake bullshit because the u.s. law which we follow okay we follow, okay? We follow the law.
We do, right?
We're getting to a point where we have to follow the law
because this is a Palantir AI killer, you know,
killer robot world we live in.
You cannot get away with breaking laws in America.
You just can't.
Okay. But
in any case,
um, Nobody more, nobody think, that's an ethical thing, okay?
Ethically, we follow U.S. law.
But there's not a single soul in the history, or there's not a single soul living in America today.
Who is morally aligned with the government and its laws.
They're not.
That's not the moral center.
Like, have you guys ever watched a single Hollywood movie where U.S. law was actually the thing, the receptacle of our genuine human
morality? Isn't it so that in every movie you've ever watched or every story that's ever been
told in the past four decades, the police and the federal agencies,
these are just like some kind of background,
like,
cynical thing.
And the real epic where we explore human morality
is like completely outside of that.
Like, have you guys ever watched a movie about like gangs and and feuds and rivalries and
betrayal and shit like that?
Like whether you're playing Grand Theft Auto, whether you're like watching John Wick, you think John Wick is some law-abiding citizen?
That's just like, that's what I mean.
Every type of story and narrative that we think about does not include a notion of the law as a receptacle of moral truth.
And this is even true in movies where the protagonists are the police.
For example, if you watch true detective season one, okay, yes, the protagonists are FBI agents, but Rust Cole, he doesn't get his inspiration.
The language, the articulation of his moral cosmos doesn't exist in the law.
It's outside of it.
He is also outside of the law, the official law that is.
The only piece of media in the past four decades I can think of, where the protagonist, the law enforcer protagonist is somehow morally aligned with the law is Twin Peaks with Dale Cooper.
Dale Cooper is just like, this is some good coffee. I am a trooper. I completely am morally aligned with the correct way of doing things,
and that, my friends, is moral. But notice what the price of that is even within that narrative.
In order even for a character like, and that's why Dale Cooper is such a revolutionary
figure in a lot of ways.
Precisely his naive allegiance, his blind loyalty to the law, which is almost comical sometimes,
creates a kind of disturbing tension which is manifested in
Lynch's kind of
supernatural
world surrounding Cooper
and his kind of uh, world surrounding Cooper.
And his kind of us, the thing about,
do you want to know what's revolutionary about Dale Cooper and Twin Peaks?
Does anyone,
ones if you're still fucking here,
because I don't see this fucking chat movie.
What the fuck?
You want to know the revolutionary thing about Dale Cooper and Twin Peaks? It's
the mere notion that
morality and the law,
whatever the law so happens to be,
stop, now shut up. Now stop up now stop okay stop it's too much now it's the
it's the mere notion that the moral and the ethical could be united it's like not only does dale cooper follow the law
he also believes in it as well and the it's like formally that is revolutionary now the content of the u.s. law is not revolutionary at all and following i'm not saying
i'm saying just the notion that those the idea that those two could ever be aligned is itself something revolutionary
but in order for those to be aligned us law we would have to have a revolution right which is why
dale cooper such a disturbing figure nobody believes
someone like that could actually exist in the world we inhabit today because everyone knows the
government is fucking corrupt that the fbi is fucking corrupt right um so that's what i hope you understand what i mean by that but in any case that is the one
exception i can think of which comes from david lynch where the protagonist is a law enforcement person,
and somehow that's still a moral agent. Yeah, someone, you mentioned Breaking Bad. Everyone
loves fucking Breaking Bad, okay? Walter White is morally gray, but the arena with which an authentic exploration of human morality is not happening
at the level of the law the official law it's happening at the level of you, a gray area of the law or even out, completely outside of the law, actually, right?
And the stuff out of which the moral emerges, that is a
that is a nomadic
step desert type of environment
that is on the
that's a frontier environment okay
this is the frontier
that is where the conquerors and revolutionaries of world history
emerge from these kind of frontiers where official laws break down but this has become a ubiquitous
condition of human civilization.
Traditionally, the laws of the bourgeois state were associated with a civil society of proletarians and the bourgeoisie and so on and so on but when civil society is becoming
dysfunctional with the rise of lumpinization because of automation which is going to happen at an even more accelerated rate,
people are now in a fucking desert. They're in some kind of step type environment, some kind
of frontier between civilization itself and barbarism and it that's why Islam has acquired the renewed significance that it does today when you think about it there, I mean, who were Malcolm X's followers?
So people have a specific association with the lumpin, right?
Why do you have organizations like the nation of Islam who take these lumpin and they're completely straight edge.
They don't smoke, they don't drink, they don't do drugs, they don't steal, they don't rape,
they don't do any of these things we associate with wild violent criminals and yet the subject of the
nation of islam were the lumpin these are not dynamics that were accounted for or talked about in the
19th century calling these new post automation masses the lumpin is fucking wrong right it's not
correct and you know i started really fucking thinking about this shit like the straw that broke the camels back really fucking thinking about this shit. Like the straw that
broke the camel's back for me,
thinking about this shit, was when I
learned, the truth is this, okay?
Let's just fucking admit the truth, honestly.
The subject of infrared
in the beginning were not
blue-collar proletletarians you guys became blue collar
proletarians because you were inspired by the message this is like the nation of islam you
guys before a lot of you were lumpin and that's okay actually you weren't lumpin in a sense i would agree with
but like you were just as lumpin as the subject of the black panthers a lot of y'all are and were. And you became blue collar
workers out of inspiration. Not because you originally were that and started out that way.
So whether we're living in an era with the rise of neo nomads well
Islam is a religion of nomads so it is no surprise whatsoever that in an era of neo-nomadism
Islam acquires the renewed significance that it has.
I want to, like, let's begin with understanding that, okay? robots replacing every worker amounts to a suspension of class struggle.
How is it even possible to challenge the center from that position? I will explain to you why you're thinking about it the wrong way completely.
You're completely thinking about everything the wrong fucking way okay and but in order
to explain that to you i have to talk about the pre-modern world the pre-modern world was a place
where automation was the norm but instead of robots doing the automation
it was something called natural automation
ecological cycles and natural cycles
did more labor
the labor that people did do was mainly confined to their interaction with a given
kind of ecological system. So, for example, in the pre-modern world, the world of agrarian relations, in the islamic world people usually had plots that they
attended to well most of the labor that's being done when you own a plot is actually done by nature
pastoralists who have cattle and animals and things like that, well, that is also automated in a lot of ways because the animals are autonomous beings, right? Third Observer
with the 10, what's up?
Appreciate you, bro.
Horses are
autonomous forms of
embodied intelligence, right?
They're not robots, they come from
nature, but a huge portion of the means of production
more than an industrial modern society comes from nature so nature actually plays a huge
fucking role in defining what the means of production are in the pre-modern era.
Ones if you understand what I'm saying with that, how nature is a kind of primary form of means of production.
Okay, good. Stop with the ones. Stop. Stop. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it.
Okay. So, something different happens in the modern era, okay?
So usually in Asiatic empires, you had publicly funded R&D.
You had manufacturers and workshops and laboratories funded by the court whose discoveries
would then be kind of
adopted and standardized
by the empire
and reap a profit
of some kind, right?
So something different happened with the early modern west where that system or that relationship was actually decentralized and that decentralization is actually associated with capital.
Okay.
So a private businessman or merchant would fund a privately owned workshop he would hire some scientists and he would pay them to research and develop new methods of production for manufacturers and this created a new kind of
relationship that we would later call capital right you know you're investing in
capital and means of production and you're reaping a profit for that more or less
okay well at some point in the history of an of modern civilization that we call the
industrial revolution what is the industrial revolution what is industrial uh industrialization okay what is um what is industrialization? Well, industrialization in large part, alienated labor from a more kind of embedded natural context and creates, you know, the type of labor
um,
whose premises are no longer nature per se,
but some kind of like mechanical,
uh, simulation of, of like mechanical simulation of hitherto natural processes, right?
So industrialization, I mean, I don't know if I can come up with a simple definition of industrialization right now, but
industrialization more or less transforms ecological circuits and cycles into something whose
premises are artificial and man-made. So artificiality is at the source and at the foundation of industrialization.
Okay.
When things are industrialized, the premises of production become fundamentally artificial okay there's an artificialization of the means of
production so that put it this way the means of production is no longer like cattle or a horse
or a field or you know a river or something inherited from nature
it is in some at least within some kind of systemic context comprehensively man-made and artificial
a movable type of manual of of uh property that is why the landlords persisted, even in Marx's time, because landlords had a monopoly on
nature, what came from nature. So land. Well, that comes from nature. Well, the capitalists
own the factory that was on top of the land and he had to pay the landlord rent
so landlords are not the agents behind industrialization the capitalists are right so although nature is
still here it didn't abolish nature, industrialization is happening at the level of a type of labor whose embedded context is itself created by labor. So when labor itself creates the means of production through by means of which labor itself realizes its product
then we have industrialization when the premises of labor are themselves the result of labor
that is industrialization when the worker is in a factory that factory was built by other workers. The tools that the worker is using are tools created by other workers. When a serf or a peasant is tilling the field you know that field is created by nature do you understand so industrialization kind You understand?
So industrialization kind of creates the premises of life and of labor and of production as man-made, okay, artificial.
So what did that create in terms of philosophy and our understanding of our place in the world?
Well, because it's man-made, the methodological individualism prevailed that this is the result of someone's will.
That labor means strongly willing your intentions into existence. I am the subject,
I pick up a hammer, and I make what I want to make.
It's mine,
I make it. It's an extension of
my personality.
I am the demyergic
creator. I'm creating. I'm the one producing the creator and so on and so on. This is the kind of Promethean hubris of the modern age, and that Promethean hubris shared between the bourgeoisie who thinks that they're these inventive geniuses,
you know, even still with like Elon Musk, and also the proletariat, who are the producers and creators you know and if you see soviet civilization
that's very clear and evident the proletariat they're the masters of the universe.
But this Promethean hubris has been severely damaged with the rise of automation.
I'm not saying the Promethean orientation was Satanic or Luciferian or bad.
I'm just saying it was very much put in a state of severe disorientation and severely weakened with the rise of automation. And it continues to be weakened with the rise of automation.
That's why we had the whole barista debate.
The reason why there are a lot of barista, you know,
baristas,
the barista partisans in that debate,
is because a lot of people don't really buy the idea
that the Promethean proletariat still exists. It's like, okay, you know, the worker with a hammer
creating reality demiurgically, people do not buy that as much as they used to anymore, right?
Although blue collar workers still exist,
and of course they are still fundamental for production and have the power to shut nations and countries down.
There's something that has destabilized.
Um... that has destabilized the um the articulation of of that kind of labor being the subject of politics today, right? And when you think about it, this is the ultimate triumph of proletarian logic because the notion of an individual through sheer willpower
making the world is actually something from the bourgeoisie it's the proletariat that has the spirit that the logos of the proletariat is the complete
um dominance of some kind of autonomous collective intelligence as the main source of the production and realization of the world, right?
In some sense. So it's an irony. It's a profound irony, okay?
It's a profound irony, actually.
So, you know, in my lecture on friday i talked about a type of external intelligence that the koran describes an ayat we can call ayat signs uh intelligences right external intelligences or intelligibles right either way
call them intelligibles uh the production of honey by bees right it's not something we are doing ourselves we can be beekeepers we can attend to that
process but that's not a result of our will it's a sign from god right it's a miraculous sign from
god right and um i'm about to fucking blow your guys's minds but you have to fucking like keep up
and listen and lock the fucking listen to me all right so um what is happening with ai well all that's happening artificial intelligence is revealing that the intelligence behind human labor today is not the individual human anymore.
In the same way that bees make honey,
well, is that a result of someone's intelligence?
No, that's an intelligible in the real.
So artificial intelligence
shares with the pre-modern world
a return to
the place
of intelligence and this
kind of cycle of production
happening externally
in the real. That it is man-made i mean it's so beautiful actually when you think
about it yes it's man-made but not as we please it's man-made but it's the result of it's not something we willed into existence. It's something that
has emerged as a consequence of our existence. It's something that is man-made, but not made according to a conceit by an individual, something we have seamlessly given way to.
This is something very poetically and, you know, romantically described by Nick Land when he talks about AI, right?
But in any case, why do I think AI in particular justifies a return to the hickmatic um you know the hickmatic uh orientation that i talked about in my lecture on
friday so if you don't know uh friday I talked about how in the Islamic golden age, Avicina, the Aristotelian, was the kind of peak of Islamic rationalism.
So rational, proving God through
demonstrative procedures
you know
demonstrative justification
and that is philosophy
right
you know A is A
because if C was C
then A would not be C.
And therefore, cannibalism is justified because if premise P2, P1, cannibal one, two, then P3 of the cannibalistic impulse would be P4 justified.
Therefore, I can eat people.
So, you know, you get the idea, right?
In some sense, this is philosophy.
You know, it's a procedural kind of demonstrative form of inquiry, okay?
Okay, but uh form of inquiry okay okay but when the turks were starting to encroach upon the abbasids and take over the boyids and the seljuks we had a new a new genre of islamic thinking emerged that began by al-gazali al-gazali said that if rationalism is justified because the senses can deceive us, is it possible that there could be anything that could be justified by the fact that reason can deceive us.
You know, and Friday, when I gave the lecture, I was like, take like destiny or any of these other
P-PAP people, right?
It's like through a prep, P-1, P-2, you could justify anything.
It's sophistry.
You could justify whatever you want.
You could, if your heart is tainted, then the procedures of reason will also be tainted, right? That's why Aristotle, put it this way. Aristotle claims to be the ultimate rationalist, but he was just a pedophile slave owner,
and his philosophy just reflects the tainted heart of a pederastic slave owner. Right?
Like that's the ultimate example.
Like Aristotle, the ultimate rational...
Aristotle was a fucking petter-ass slave owner.
That's all he was.
And his rational philosophy
just reflects
the heart and the feelings of a
petter-ass slave owner.
So Al-Ghazali
points that out and exposes this fact.
And Al-Gazali opens
Islamic thinking toward a new notion beyond reason
which is also takes it beyond philosophy into something new which i I call Hikma.
Hickma in Arabic means wisdom, and it's like Sophia.
It means the same thing as Sophia.
So philosophy is phylo-sophia, love of Sophia.
Sophia means wisdom.
Sophia is also a womanly, a feminine principle, right? Hickma is the same, same thing. So instead of philosophy, we're directly going into wisdom. Not the love of wisdom, but wisdom directly and you know directly wisdom right so that is hickma hickma okay so after al-gazali philosophy dies in the islamic world as in it's replaced by something called hikma okay
hickma is an embedded type of praxis which is not the rejection of reason, but attempts to discover the deeper premises of reason
in our embedded relationship with the world. How do we articulate our place in the world?
How do we make sense of the ayat, the signs,
like the production of honey by bees?
How do we reflect upon that?
How do we orient our practices toward spiritual purification? How do we interpret
the signs within the world as distinct, the intelligibles, as distinct forms of luminous self-authentication that manifest proof of god okay so hickma is about so so for example, a hikmatic type of practice would be beekeeping, right?
And his Sufi beekeeping, like the way Gerjayev describes in his fourth way with this Sarmung brotherhood or whatever, right?
Where you partake and participate in beekeeping and reflection upon this
simultaneously inspires you with a sense of profound appreciation for God in the miracles of existence
and the world and inspires you toward reflecting on and being grateful for your you know, your existence and for the creator and so on and so on.
It also humbles you, profoundly humbles you.
Gardening is something you can do maybe, and it humbles you, right?
Having a kid humbles you right having a kid humbles you when you have a child and you raise a child that's an extremely humbling experience you know uh if you genuinely devote
yourself to a craft or a form of labor it's also humbling right because you're annihilating the self you're devoting yourself to a something and the self kind of disappears and you attend and care for something outside of yourself to realize it right
and uh you know when you see the signs of god in reality that becomes a source of moral inspiration
to become a better person to treat others around you better, right?
To be more sincere, to be more, to be more honest, to be to act and have have intentions that are aligned morally aligned with a moral cosmos okay
so hickma is about a praxeological relationship and insight into the cosmos okay that is hickma it's deeper than
philosophy hickma is something that transcends philosophy itself okay now why do i think hickma is relevant in the age of
i'll tell you why because a i itself has monopolized reason.
Philosophy doesn't exist because AI is philosophy.
AI is Avicenna.
You can PPP all you fucking want,
but you can't do it better than chat GPT, especially not
chat GPT Astra. The ultimate rational agent is AI. And when AI begins to do more and more things for us, that's also going to be evident to us
that actually AI is like a rationalist and we know that's not human.
Just because you're rationally consistent and rigorous doesn't make you human.
To be human, you need to be hickmatic.
You need a deeper relationship to the world that involves something like synthesis or what they would maybe call today alignment.
All the AI researchers are panicking about AI alignment.
Well, what if the first aliner was al-gazali to align a i you need hickma right yes attunement spiritual attunement it's the same thing as alignment right and the fundamental role and this will address to this person that the class struggle i am not going to jump the gun and say the class struggle of the workers and the Buzo Z is over.
I want to create a hypothetical so that you better understand how class struggle can also take on a new form in addition to that.
The struggle for alignment. Isn't that the struggle for alignment isn't that the struggle today isn't the struggle today
a struggle over how artificial intelligence has to be aligned should artificial intelligence be aligned for Palantir and for Israel?
Or should it be aligned for something human, for the majority, for the people?
Isn't that a fund?
Isn't that like, in essence, the struggle?
Let's assume our entire society because the guy said well look
if our entire society becomes automated then you know revolutionary praxis becomes impossible that's not
true the revolution is about how AI is aligned is it going to be aligned is it going to be
attuned on behalf of these vampire fucking gatekeepers who have been outmoded with the rise of
a i or is it going to be attuned and aligned with our moral, human, spiritual principles, and values?
And I'm not talking about aligning chat GPT, because let me tell you the truth. If all of the means of production become um a i then um we're all we're already in socialism.
It's just that it's not necessarily going to be a socialism for the whole people.
It's going to be a socialism for the gatekeepers who came from a prior mode of production.
You're saying, well, that sounds more like a political struggle than an objective basis in the
economy.
Of course, the objective basis is in the economy.
The relations of production have changed.
When the relations of production change, that's when the political revolution becomes necessary.
Right?
So this is exactly what I'm talking about.
Um... um but the revolutionary subject wouldn't be the working class anymore
in this hypothetical the revolutionary subject would be all those deprived of benefit or alignment with artificial intelligence.
That's who the subject would be, the people not benefiting from AI.
Assuming there is everything, I don't know if that's possible, but I have to be frank with you.
I think I've underestimated how possible it is.
I mean, like, robotics is accelerating at such a rate.
Even I am fucking shocked.
And AI is also getting really
fucking good at, you know,
doing a lot of things. And I used to be
really cynical about this idea
that there could be an AI
welder. But when
I think 15 years from now, I don't
fucking know. I really don't fucking know.
I really don't fucking know.
I can't say with confidence there will never be a robot that cannot do, like, that can't be an electrician or some shit. You know?
China already has them.
Yeah, I mean, I don't know, dude.
And China being the driving force behind all this is also really interesting.
And it made,
this is so neo-Islamic.
Like, during the Islamic world,
China was a huge manufacturer,
which through the Silk world was China was a huge manufacturer, which through the silk world, it was like pumping all these goods.
The whole drama of world
Islam has a hidden source
in China. Did you know that? The whole
silk world was about the trade from China
to the western part of eurasia and that
ran through the step and and that kind of belt and road that silk road was the source of all of this drama and and um conflict
which created these huge confederations and step empires and the fucking crazy thing is that's
literally happening again in Central Asia today. Thank you. consensus among Chinese Marxists, it's not possible to build a peer intelligence to humans.
No, listen, we're getting it all wrong. You can create an artificial intelligence that can be Avicenna, but you can't create an AI that can be
Al-Ghazali. There cannot be an artificial hikma. Sophia or hickma
will only ever be human
right
Sophia cannot be a robot
she will always
be human
Hickma will always
belong to humanity.
AI will never have Hickma.
It will never have attunement.
When AI aligns itself, it doesn't have the potency to align itself.
In the long run, it can't.
So there's a struggle over alignment.
No, a robot isn't simply a slave.
It's just that it's Avicenna, not Al-Gazali.
AI exhaust rationalism. This is the end of modern rationalism.
In the same way that we are beyond traditional bourgeois and Republican civil society,
we're beyond rationalism now.
When AI completely monopolizes rationalism, the only way we're going to be able to get attuned to our own humanity is through something that appears very irrational, right?
They need examples of Hickma.
Hickma is any cultivation
of practice
that corresponds
to spiritual and moral attunement.
So it could be Eddie's wrestling,
can be a type of hickma.
If Eddie's wrestling inspires him
to be with a moral clarity it is a type of hickma if when you reflect it's more important also to understand the reflection upon these practices is where there's wisdom and hickma. When you, it's not simply in the act of martial arts that you are engaged in hickma. it's also when you can reflect and comprehend through your sixth sense and appreciation for how that embodied intelligence or intelligible is a source of moral clarity and inspiration.
And do you want to know another word for Hickma that i talked about in previous streams
infra woke that's what infra woke was about remember when i gave the lecture about stage one
consciousness state or stage one non-consciousness stage two woke
stage three
infrowoke
member of the three stages
Hickma is the third stage
that's exactly what we're fucking talking
about here okay and um i finally want to say you know something
i really wanted to mention in the lecture which i couldn't and this is me going off the top like i didn't
i don't even have my lecture in front of me. So there's stuff in there that you're going to have to wait for my essay for sure. But one thing I for sure wanted to talk about is Alexander Kojev's idea of Sophia. So Kouchev draws from Soloviev, right?
Soloveev has this notion of the fourth hypostasis of God, Father, Son, Holy Spirit, Sophia, right?
And Kouchev interprets Sophia in a radically kind of materialist or atheist way,
where Sophia for him is the sum total of mankind as a collective being.
So Sophia is the collective, man as a collective self-knowledge,
to the process of history coming to know itself, as described by
Hegel.
For Kojev, that process kind of culminates in the universal state led by Stalin, who Kojev regards as like having a sage-like wisdom and practical insight, which, you know, a philosopher and intellectual can from the sidelines interpret and look at this self-knowledge, but Stalin's actually the guy
getting shit moving and participating in it with clarity and with intelligence and so on and so on.
So Kojev tries to re-initiate
the recognition between the philosopher and the tyrant
that Hegel tried
Hegel wrote a letter to Napoleon
He said Napoleon was the world spirit on horseback
Napoleon was the guy getting shit done
Hegel was the guy recognizing this When the guy getting shit done. Hegel was the guy recognizing this.
When the guy getting shit done can recognize the guy who recognizes this shit,
that unity creates this kind of absolute knowledge and completes the thing you know and like so cogev recognizes
the integral kind of comprehensive context of Stalin as a leader if co if Stalin recognizes
cogev then the guy moving the world can recognize the guy who recognizes
him and that mutual recognition creates the kind of ultimate sophianic fulfillment of mankind, achieving perfect self-knowledge with respect to itself.
Because, you know, Koja begins with this notion from the uh champion during the italian
renaissance it comes from the uh roads i believe from gree, know thyself, right?
And for Kojev, knowledge has this supreme significance ontologically for man, because when something knows itself, rather than just is itself, it then exists for itself. It doesn't just exist accidentally or something. It achieves a kind of ultimate self-relation. This was Kodjev's idea of, you know, which he agrees with Hegel about, about why knowledge has this privilege significance, or I should rather say consciousness or self-consciousness. So for Kojev, communism is the ultimate self-knowledge or self-consciousness of humanity, and it's nothing more than that, right?
Communism is the realization of that, and the application, of course, like it goes without saying, the application of that knowledge practically in an embedded historical way, right?
That's why Boris Groyes drew the conclusion in the communist postscript that communism the currency of communism is language
because in language we are all one in a way like language is something that unites all of us
that exists in common.
And language
is the place where we are
in common. And regardless
of any particular characteristics
or differences or
individuality or anything like that, right?
So the radical thesis of the communist post script actually comes from Koujev and his book,
Sophia, right?
Well, what is the difference between the Islamic notion of Hikma or the Marxist, the neo-Marxist
neo-Hikma thing I'm trying to do, and cogev's notion of Sophia well Kojev regards Sophia as something that needs to be
achieved through full incarnation right the full incarnation of mankind's self-knowledge or
self-consciousness with respect to itself only when that achieves full incarnation right do we have communism and the end of history and so on and so on
but the islamic view is that there is a kind of self-knowledge or intelligence that already
exists now in the
real. So
the embedded praxis
of mankind across, it's like
that is already wisdom.
You don't need
to have a
institutionalization
of the universal self-knowledge
of humanity
for us to achieve the kind of sociological or sophianic all unity so this kind of
um islamic notion of hickma differs because it rejects the view that we can only achieve Hickma through the full incarnation of human self-consciousness universally.
Rather, we can partake in Hickma, right?
Through the attunement of our actions and and simultaneously the reflection of the signs the ayat right signs are kind of um intelligibles in the real that vindicate and inspire us with spiritual or moral attunement.
One such sign was the proletariat for Karl Marx.
Lacan said that Marx was the first one to discover the symptom.
He called it the symptom.
Lacan's symptom or symptom is structurally the same thing as an ayat in the hickmatic tradition when marx writes that the proletariat is the ingenious soil of the people that is like the acknowledgement of the bees
yes but it's uniquely human it's about the human intelligence right the proletariat is this kind
of cunning or intelligence of history that proves and vindicates for Marx the universal emancipation of humanity is underway.
So the proletariat for Marx was an ayat.
It was a sign.
Communism was also a sign for marks notice something about carl marks okay communism predated marks so marks could only look at communism as a sign he didn didn't invent it. He was looking at it. And how did he describe it? He described it as a specter haunting Europe. An omen, an ominous thing, a sign of the times. What for Marx was communism? If not, a sign of the times? Wasn't that exactly what it was?
Isn't that exactly what he devoted his life trying to prove that communism was a sign of the imminent transformation of the
world because of the contradictions internal to the capitalist mode of production.
So when Marx moved beyond philosophy, marks also moved into the hickmatic tradition i want to talk about something I told you I would talk about something I told you I would talk about.
I mentioned about three or four things the part about morality oh boy okay now i'm
going to get to the interesting one okay i. I want to talk about good and evil,
and this is probably the most important part of the stream.
So if you stuck around for this long, congratulations.
And if you didn't, you are really fucking missing out, and I mean that.
All right. So
beyond, so
understanding morality and good and evil.
So people
will reproach me.
And in the Midwestern Marx comment section,
you know, they're like,
Haas is talking a bunch of nonsense.
Why? Why do we just go back to
Fred Hampton in true Marxism?
None of this metaphysical nonsense
and all this stupid
fucking retarded shit these brainlets
are fucking saying in Midwestern
Marx comment section of the live stream.
Okay.
The Marxism conference live stream comment section.
Like, whatever.
Well, because although Fred Hampton was a good guy, and of course Marxism is correct, and Marxism
Leninism is correct, you are not a good fucking person, or you are not correct, I should say,
unless you're specifying, in some way at least, turning correctness into a principle that can be
communicated to others as information. You are not a good person if you do not in some way
radiate goodness around you.
And that can be as small as influencing your children to be better people,
or you're inspiring people around you to be better.
You're either polluting, you're either radiating goodness into the world,
or you're polluting evil into the world and there is no in
between there are so many fucking useless retards calling running around calling themselves marxists and
marxist leninists who are genuinely useless
fucking retards. So yes
we have to specify
what is the correct
path and what is the incorrect path
and it's not fucking enough.
Well, all we have to do is just adopt baseline, common sense, you know, ordinary Marxism.
But every other person who
has that label
just so happens to be fucking wrong
and a revisionist
listen to me
all you have to do
is be just a Marxist.
And that's fine.
Oh, okay, so do you agree with all the people who call themselves Marxist?
No, they're lying about it.
They're all wrong, and I'm right.
That's the state of Marxism in the world today, at least in the West.
It's like all these same fucking retards who are like,
you just have to be an ML and don't ever fucking engage with anything else.
Do they agree with all the other
MLs? No, they fucking don't.
They just, well, now they're wrong and I'm right.
Yeah, it's sectarian retards.
All this could be avoided
if we have a more of a
specificity of what we fucking mean, okay?
With respect to what is correct and what is incorrect.
If you're a good person and you fail to translate your goodness into a principle that is impersonal in some sense and can infect
and be communicated to others you are contributing evil to the world and i'll tell you why evil has
to eat do you know something evil people like you know evil people rely on we as society not being clear enough about how they're fucking wrong i'll give you the most basic
definition of how evil works or basic example take a pedophile when a pedophile or a per, let's not go pedophile because it's too far. Take some kind of sick pervert. When a pervert is in a room with sane people and, you know, some
woman is like, oh, I'm tired.
I'm going to crack my feet up.
And she, like, you know, she's just
like cracks her feet up on the
couch or something because she's tired.
The pervert goes, he's like,
oh my God, she wants wants me she definitely is doing that because she knows i love feet she's definitely
like some shit that's only inside of him
that nowhere was specified by anything right
if we lived in a proper society we would isolate that
pathology and that behavior and we would turn it into a sign that is that that that is being
blasted all around that fucking person so there is no fucking way that
they could ever that that evil perversion inside of them could ever reproduce by latching itself
onto fake signs.
The best type of evil is a fake sign.
When you think, for example, someone likes you,
oh my God, this is the most correct one. When you think someone likes you, oh my God, this is the most correct one.
When you think someone likes you and is into you, and you're reading into what they're
fucking doing, and you turn out to be fucking wrong.
Like, evil works in the same way all evil works that way evil people look at the world and they're they read into it in wrong ways.
They're like, oh, you know, have you ever, oh my God, bro, have you guys seen Squid Games?
You know the creator of the Squid Game in the show? Like, within the lore, the fictional universe, the sick old man who created this torture shit,
right?
His impetus was that he looked outside one day and he saw a homeless man.
And he's like, they were all walking past him and nobody cared about him therefore
human beings are evil and therefore i should be evil and do the same shit so he read into the
world in a fucking wrong way because his evil was virally reproduced
through a misunderstanding. Because in the show, it turns out, he just didn't stare at the window
long enough, but like one minute later, people rushed and helped the guy, right?
So that's the tragedy behind it, supposedly.
But that's how evil works.
That's just one example.
Evil creates false signs in the real and uses those to reproduce itself evil has to eat
evil cannot exist until it eats it doesn't just exist because someone is rotten and bad.
Bad people psychologically cannot continue existing unless the wickedness and rottenness inside of them can eat.
And it feeds off of our inability to communicate our principles to the world effectively.
Evil has to eat.
So the goal of a good person is to suffocate evil starve evil there's two ways to starve
evil specify with clarity the correct versus the incorrect.
But even when you do that, people can find loopholes.
So the second thing you have to fucking do is you have to actually flush out the snakes from underground by identifying various different
kinds of ways of misreading the real you name them and shame them and then you annihilate them.
When the pervert who's into feet is, when that pathology is named, they feel exposed and naked.
Because when we can turn the rottenness and wickedness
in the hearts of people
into a text,
they have nowhere to fucking hide anymore.
We see you now.
You can't hide.
You're not a special subject.
You are conforming to something we can see.
We see you.
And why does it matter that we see them because they cannot claim they have
they have a dialectic that we can't respond to our moral our good can sublate you. We can respond to you. We can eat you.
Eat or be eaten. Either good eats or evil eats. This is the Zoroastrian truth good and evil are not fixed things outside we it's a war
either good is going to eat or evil's going to eat we have to eat the evil people not literally but we have to have the good eat the evil the
evil the correct path eat the evil path when Mao named the Soviet revisionist, he ate them.
He established a principle that identified a pathology, revisionism
these arrogant fucking
Soviet-aligned revisionists in China
he said we see you now
Mao's dialectic had the last word.
All individuals aspire to be universal subjects.
When the specificity
of who we are is drawn
out,
if you're a good person,
it's okay. You don't have a problem.
But if you're an evil person,
that destroys you. It annihilates
you.
Because something you thought was natural or automatic turned out to be a text that you never accounted for
or were accountable for
you were never accountable
for your text
the evil lies in reading into shit
is some of the most profound shit you could ever
understand evil is when you read into shit is some of the most profound shit you could ever understand. Evil
is when you read into shit
the wrong fucking way.
That's so fucking true. You guys think I'm fucking crazy, but having a kind of moral kind of cosmology even based on how we interpret and reflect upon signs is exactly what we
fucking need in an era of AI where all that is this AI is creating signs all around us.
It's making, it's creating all these different intelligibles around us. Artificial intelligence. What does artificial intelligence do?
It renders things intelligible okay it's on us to reflect upon the signs and how we reflect upon the
science is how we align the AI.
How do we reflect upon intelligibles is the key to the alignment of AI. good i'm going to tell you, the whole cosmos is like a text. It's like a book. Good is when the text is complete. Good lies in the completion of the text.
Evil is when we suspend this completion.
And we reproduce or we convey or we reflect an incomplete text.
Evil is literally the incompleteness of text.
It is the incompleteness of text it is the incompleteness of the holy koran evil is the
incompleteness of the koran you can quote me when i say that when being good means to align yourself with the completeness of the Quran if it's not the
Quran be it however you want it whatever this whatever the universal text of the cosmos is
when you're aligned with that that is good but when you take one part of it only and you you you won't you don't finish it
that's actually the source of all evil in the world need to understand that guys you need to
really fucking understand what i'm getting out here guys. You need to really
fucking understand what I'm getting out of here. Thank you. You know, I don't know anything about AI Mass. You know, all right y'all if you liked the stream and you liked my speech at the conference be sure to drop some gifteds if you liked it the conference was pretty good,
but it did come at the expense of
streaming, you know?
I wasn't able to stream
last week because of that.
But otherwise, guys,
I think that was, I need, and people need to fucking understand something about me, right? Is that I'm an absolutely fearless fucking person.
And also my life is all about conflict and war.
And that's really what it's about.
And there's nothing I love more than bringing snakes who live in the shadows, bringing them to light.
I love fucking doing that.
Because my dominion is the light of day.
All my enemies are bitches who live in darkness.
My dominion is the light of day, right?
Some people have problems with me.
Vegan with the five, appreciate you so much, bro. Some people have issues retarded and think they can hold me hostage to their fucking
their crash outs and shit and really what I can say to that is
you know
Shadow what I appreciate you
what I can say to that is
uh Shadow, what I appreciate you. What need to understand something about you, right?
I do not take pleasure in the destruction of my enemies, per se, but when I have to do that
I'm locked the fuck in to do it
like a fucking lion chasing their prey
really it's the truth
like okay you know
like straight up
it's just the fucking truth
like I'm locked the fuck in on that shit
do I enjoy it I don't think so but it's like I'm locked the fuck in on that shit. Do I enjoy it?
I don't think so, but it's like, I'm locked
the fuck in. You know what I mean?
You want to make yourself an enemy of me
good fucking luck. Okay? Simple
as that.
Fucking stupid LARP.
It's fucking retarded-ass LARP. You know, I'm trying to just muster the whatever in me to care, but I just fucking don't.
It's just fucking, when people
have an issue with me and they don't
resolve it in some kind of way,
they're just fucking
larping and coping, and it's just there's nothing
more pathetic than that, you know?
And there's no reason to take shit personally because the truth is it's feds.
100%.
Always feds.
I didn't talk to Butch at all, actually.
He did say that he liked some of the things I said at the second day of the conference regarding the Sufi stuff. I did not. I saw his speech and I had to go back.
I had to leave.
But regarding his speech,
um, but regarding his speech um who is he calling nothing happened at the conference
if that's what you guys think I'm getting at here
trust me there's nothing at the conference
um I will say that, you know, I feel very strongly that, I don't have a problem with someone who has rhetoric against white supremacy,
whatever that means to them, you know.
I prefer to...
I don't prefer that term
I prefer terms like being anti-black
because I don't
I don't want the term to be about
you know oh well white people are too
high and then you know no it's not there's no problem with people
it's i don't like the no the associating that what's positive for white people is bad for
black people and other people, right?
I prefer, you know, and I know it's like political correctness.
So point is taken.
I don't have an issue with the language.
My own language, you know, I prefer to understand racism in terms of who is being oppressed and being put down, not who is raising themselves up, who is being put down. The second thing I say is that I do not appreciate
this idea that
you know
I don't like when
our people
in our party who are white
I don't like or appreciate in any way a white person in our party being
made to feel like their presence should be less appreciated because they're white okay and my take I mean I'm
I'm willing to work with anybody you know who's principal I think
butch wear is ultimately principled but you, my view is that...
I mean, Islam is about creating a type of community that transcends race, really, for real, you know, and like,
the truth is, I don't care what your fucking race,
you know, and if someone has some racism inside of them we will that will be exposed through the signs
of their wickedness right but we will not recognize your racism by saying that that means white
people are bad or something we will say you have failed to be worthy
of our universal tartarian brotherhood and that's your sin i will never allow anyone in our party to be put down for who they are
and i don't care who they are including if they're a jew if you're a jew in our party and someone wants you to repent and atone for being Jewish, I won't allow it.
If you're white in our party and someone wants, I won't allow it.
If you're black in our party and someone attempts to make you feel bad because you're black or put you down because you're black, I will never allow it on my life, I will never allow a single person in our party to be put down for any fucking reason that has to do with their lineage and their ancestry and who their parents are and who their family is.
Because we are one tribe.
And it's an insult to our tribe when people try to make our people feel less because of who they came from before. I am an extreme. You know how much racism?
You don't think I see the racism toward me, by the way.
You don't think I see the way sometimes people treat me because I am Muslim or something or Arab
or something. I ignore it.
I see it.
Of course I see it.
I'm not a fucking idiot.
A lot of people just completely fucking have an issue with me because of that by the way
some people what if someone puts down the quayim and the part?
No one can put down anything for any reason.
That's my fucking point.
Okay.
If someone is from Jewish lineage who's in our party, they know the party that they're in. Okay.
So they don't have to atone or apologize for anything.
They already made a choice to side with an army of the just, and therefore they are just.
And there's no need to have any kind of whatever, right?
And also, something I want to say is that as I continue to explore this line of inquiry,
there will be people that come out of the shadows who have a fucking problem with it, right?
Richard Spencer didn't go after your race because he didn't know my race.
He thought I was Russian.
Yeah, he thought I was Russian. He thought I was Russian. You didn't watch the debate?
He's like, your people.
He's talking about Russians. or i don't know maybe he thought i was chechen or some shit who fucking knows
mountain home they called you yellowstone Mountain home.
They called you yellow stone.
Mm-hmm.
All right, guys, I'll stream later.
Maybe tonight, tomorrow.
Maybe tomorrow.
Perhaps tomorrow.
All right, guys. Are y'all?