Dylan Burns Gets WIPED on Taiwan, then PUNKS OUT of a fight! [UNEDITED]

2022-01-19
then go ahead and test me outside you
really want to go outside and fight me
right now you can test me you're free to
test my man you don't you're free to
test my manhood let's continue you're
not a reason
you just you're just
saying go ahead go ahead go ahead you
can keep talking about it
uh
after the opening segments we'll jump
right into it like i said q a with a
hard helmet if you help me keep checked
out 215 14 15 for that
with that who would like to go first
i'm fine either way
uh you go ahead
okay
the history of taiwan is a history of
struggle whether it be the indigenous
peoples movements against the qing
dynasty which they struggled dearly i
believe one of the phrases was every
three years in insurrection every five
years in uprising all the way to modern
ages as they try to make a bulwark
against an invading force which is
consistently tried to be aggressive
against the new state of a democratic
republic of china if the question is is
taiwan a part of china the answer is yes
it is part of the republic of china
taiwan
when we talk about the justification
from a historical perspective you could
look at the resistance movement against
japanese
spanish
dutch and chinese imperialism
in what you can call taiwan what you can
call uh
the government in taipei or even the
republic of hermosa if we're talking
about the japanese
it has a history of democracy if you
look at the republican the republic of
hermosa the declaration that they put
out
it was very parisian in nature it was we
are establishing a republic
in here to defend against the japanese
invaders that was in 1895
and when we talk about the modern
history of taiwan it is a struggle to
not only develop an identity which is a
new one one that is taiwanese in nature
when the vast majority of the population
now identify as taiwanese they have
their own language they have their own
currency they have their own judicial
system they have their own military they
have their own laws they have
really their own nation
but it's not a nation in the eyes of
some why because they're playing pretend
they're playing pretend if i was to take
out this phone in my pocket and say this
is not a phone now it functions in every
way as a phone i can turn it on i can
text i can call i can do all these
things but it's not a phone i'm not
being honest with you i'm lying for any
number of reasons in this case people
are lying because they don't want to
piss off the people's republic of china
the mainland government
now let's talk about the conclusions if
someone was to say you know what i
disregard the historical basis for
taiwan's independent struggle in the
indigenous community or its own language
or its own identity that's developed or
the fact that they want their own
democracy i disregard the historical
basis let's talk about the reality of
disregarding that historical basis and
saying that the taiwanese cannot have
their own state and this is a merely an
internal affair taiwan is a nation of 25
million people it is one of the most
dense nations on earth 17 when it comes
to density if you listen to the taipei
times it's actually first if you exclude
mountainous reasons syria was 20 million
and it ranked 67th on the density scale
if we were to drop our support for
taiwan
the likelihood of war would skyrocket as
the leverage that taiwan has in
upholding its democracy would vanish and
a war across the taiwan strait would be
an absolute disaster not only would a
refugee crisis spiral out of control
worse than what we saw in syria but
america would actually be one of the
prime recipient of refugees because the
taiwanese community has deep ties to
california and many of them would be
feeling persecution political
persecution that is from the government
coming in that is something we would
have to feel the full effects of the
semiconductor industry which the world
relies on when one company within taiwan
the tmsc produces 50 of the foundries
necessary for
semiconductor production that would take
a hit international trade would take a
hit our trade with that nation would
take away america's reputation would
take a hit not to even talk about the
civil liberties that the taiwanese have
fought against uh say chen kai-shek for
example to develop that's another thing
many people will talk about the white
terror or chiang kai-shek's government
or the brutality of it and will use that
as a justification to dis delegitimize
the taiwanese people and their struggle
for independence well that's interesting
since the people that shen kaisek purged
first were the independence advocates
chiang kai-shek wanted to re-conquer the
mainland and so he purged the indigenous
people's advocates for an independent
taiwan and those people fought for years
to have a democratic taiwan with his own
system of government so i'm not going to
ramble anymore i have a lot of points i
want to go into and a lot of questions
for has about the conclusions that would
come from uh his worldview here but i'll
just stop it there
so there's three points i want to
address
amidst all that firstly let me preface
this by saying there is absolutely no
historical basis
for the region of taiwan to be a
separate country from china
the history of the relationship between
the han chinese and the indigenous
people of
taiwan is a rather interesting one the
only problem is that taiwan is currently
around 98 to 99 han chinese so there's
absolutely no basis in the historically
indigenous people of taiwan
for the indigenous for sorry foreign
independence movement as a matter of
fact some of the most renowned
indigenous politicians within
taiwan are the most ardent advocates for
unification and anti-independence
so it's rather interesting that the
indigenous people of taiwan by and large
are against independence
whereas some han liberal elites within
taiwan pro-american
are the most in favor of independence so
this talk of the indigenous struggle
against the qing or the the han chinese
is a complete nonsensical uh non-factor
in the question of whether taiwan is a
country or not because indigenous people
do not factor whatsoever in the question
of whether taiwan
is an independent country now second of
all in the history i will concede that
politics has oftentimes played a role in
defining nation states
france was a historically
united
region based on the kingdom of france
and the common shared language customs
etc but it did not become a nation-state
until it was united by the republic in
ideals of the french revolution so i
will concede that politics often plays a
part politics and religion in the
formation of nations the only problem is
that china is not just a nation it is
not a nation state it is a 5 000 year
long civilization that has endured many
different types of political systems and
political um forms while nonetheless
maintaining being the one country of
china the one civilization of china
junghwa the middle kingdom of the world
basically is how it conceived itself
so this 5 000 year long
civilization is not producible to a
certain political project or a political
ideal which is actually something the
republic sorry the nationalists like
chiang kai-shek were able to respect and
acknowledge throughout the entirety of
the republic of china's struggle against
the people's republic a civil war that
technically did not end both chiang
kai-shek and mao zeitung recognized
that there is one china
they were merely disagreeing over who
should rule that one china and the
independence movement of taiwan has
never been popular it's always been a
marginal phenomena a phenomena we can
infer was definitely propped up by the
americans chiang kai-shek himself had to
head butt heads with the americans and
engage in
minor diplomatic conflicts with the
americans who are pushing independence
the founding mission of the kuman tang
sorry if i mispronounced it the kmt
was one china the notion that taiwan
would become an independent he faces the
very foundation of taiwan as a so-called
separate country from the people's
republic the founding mission of the
kuman tang was based on the ideals of
sun yat-sen for the unification and
rejuvenation of the china 5000 year long
chinese civilization on the basis of
the ideals of the modern world
now finally the notion that a chinese
invasion of taiwan a chinese invasion of
china in other words would lead to a
refugee crisis assumes that the people
of taiwan the chinese people of taiwan
are willing to fight to defend
the status quo that is now in place
every form of research and study that
has been conducted among the people of
taiwan has shown that they are not
willing to take up arms they are not
willing to have any bloodshed
to prevent unification with china so
there's no impetus for the people of
taiwan to
why would there be refugees when there
would be no conflict to begin with china
if hypothetically this would happen
would simply come in and finally i want
to make one last point
the notion that taiwan's current
constitution and laws and um
whatever
would be destroyed upon unification
gravely misunderstands the current uh
chinese system the chinese system the
president said by hong kong
is of one country two systems many
different systems can exist under the
sovereignty of one china and china has
expressed the people's republic of china
has expressed its fullest intention to
allow the people of taiwan to maintain
their specific system so long as they
acknowledge there is only one china
i rest my case so the first thing i want
to say so there's a bunch of things that
were wrong there but i'm just going to
start with the indigenous communities
the
indigenous community make up two percent
of the population that is true okay if
we're just talking about people who just
primarily indigenous if we're not
talking about people who are culturally
indigenous or we're talking about
interfaith marriages and the chil we're
just we're just gonna talk about the two
percent they make up two percent of the
population yet sixty percent of the
nation's special elite forces sixty
percent they make it an extremely
disproportionate amount of the nation's
military the military that defends
taiwan the indigenous community which
you say oh they're there many of them
love the idea of chinese invasion or
china coming or any of these things they
vastly
[Music]
when it comes to the military and if you
talk about them being kmt loyalists
that's true a lot of people they know he
wants
stop interrupting me hans okay this
isn't the internet we're in person act
like a civil so what i don't care if
it's not on the internet why do i give a
shit okay calm down guys please anyway
the indigenous community are over
represented in the military because
they're willing to defend taiwan and the
system of governance that has slowly
evolved on across the taiwan strategy
studies show otherwise that's not true
by the way the studies you reference
when it comes to oh but the taiwanese
people would not defend according to the
taipei times two-thirds of the
population of taiwan have said they'd be
willing to pick up arms of defense of
taiwan two-thirds of the population
that's bullshit that's just true that's
one
bullshit i'm just the taipei
taipei times has said two-thirds of the
people of taiwan are willing to take up
arms the taipei times is lying well then
you're lying to me right now that's just
true
well
there's no way for us to independently
verify this right now so anybody can
google it google it everybody at home
the people then google it at home two
thirds look up
actually look up informed studies
this surveys have shown the polling has
shown people in taiwan are not willing
to risk any bloodshed in the midst of a
chinese uh people's republic of china
it's not true two-thirds of the
population you have one you have one
source and multiple sources that you
haven't even okay source one study then
i'm google it at home uh yeah okay so i
have one source you have no source oh
you you brought a fucking binder and i
came empty-handed good luck well that's
your fault yeah i've come prepared well
actually dylan the thing is i don't need
a binder that's the thing i don't need
to take communist work ethic huh yeah
listen
uh the thing is i don't need a binder i
don't need to cite a one study from the
taipei times to the extent of my
familiarity the people of taiwan are not
now it's up to the audience to
independently verify i can i can trust
that i'll uh come out on the right when
it comes to that i'm sure you will okay
so when it comes to the kmt the kmt has
lost the two elections when it comes to
the uh the indigenous supporters
okay i'm talking whether you like it or
not so the kmt this is about a different
point so this is why i can calm down the
kmt when it comes to the independent
struggle and whether independence is
popular have lost it to last two
elections cyan when has won the last two
elections in decent amounts in the
democratic progressive party which is
the party that she's a part of is the
independence party the pro-independence
party and she has stated on multiple
occasions and has been reelected on the
platform of taiwan does not need to
declare independence for we are already
independent she points to the judicial
system she points to the military she
points to the language she points to a
separate history she points to all these
things for justifiable reasons to show
that taiwan is independent and the world
is upholding a facade that it isn't an
independent nation they're pretending
the thing is if i go to taiwan has and i
call the chinese police the mainland
chinese police if i'm getting mugged
they're not gonna show up you know
what's going on the taiwanese in a
region of china it would work the same
exact way you're not going to call the
region in southern china if you're in
northern china what a stupid point
second of all are you really saying that
the chinese government has authority
over the taiwanese government it does it
doesn't have authority in hong kong it
doesn't what it doesn't have authority
in hong kong it doesn't have authority
no it doesn't wait
yeah it does it has an extradition
it's passed into hong kong don't yell at
the us the us sends are your vote
for example in hong kong let's talk
about the two china has agents in hong
kong
two systems he thinks it's so favorable
even though the taiwanese people are
horrified at the notion definitely after
developments in hong kong in hong kong
due to recent legislation that was
passed if you boo the chinese national
anthem you can actually go to prison for
that due to national security
legislation that the chinese government
has put in there their secular laws in
south korea came from and i disagree
with those laws and that came so why are
you blaming the people's republic that's
how you call it
if i go to taiwan and i say fuck taiwan
fuck the government boo the national
anthem they won't arrest me because they
have a dedication to democracy unlike
the mainland government that's only
recently because of liberalization
efforts that came at the expense of
their the status quo with the kmt but
moreover there's a number of points you
weaseled your way out of so i want to i
want to pin your opinion down on those
points so first of all you claimed that
first you made the claim that the
overall majority of the armed forces are
made up by indigenous people that's not
acceptable the special forces the
special forces that's not because
they're pro-independence they have
always been a stronghold of kmt loyalism
and fierce anti-independence sentiment
so the id so use it's a complete
non-point you mentioned the president of
taiwan say that we're already a country
you want to maintain the status quo then
maintain a status quo but try to change
your official name to the republic of
taiwan and see what will happen it is
the republic of china that is the
current status quo she's saying we
basically function already as another
country that's her opinion see what
happens when they try to make that
formal or official and see what the
response is going to be from china if
taiwan attempts to pursue secession from
china china will act swiftly
in response and the u.s can't do a god
damn thing about it uh whether you like
it or not military military planners
disagree with you that's besides the
point we're not they can't do a goddamn
thing about that strategy i'm sure
you're not a military general okay no
matter how many soviet caps you put on
then just wait a few years wait a few we
will wait a few years and we'll see what
happens anyway when it comes to the idea
that the indigenous oh they don't
support an independent taiwan even
though they were at the front and center
of every single independent struggle in
taiwanese history they're at the front
they were the first
against the han chinese who are nineteen
nineteen
first they were the first purge by
there is no kind where there is no
continuity between there's no continuity
between the historical struggles of the
taiwanese indigenous population and the
current taiwanese uh independence
movement which is overwhelmingly
dominated by chinese
because it's 98 of the population but
we're talking about a discipline why in
the military specifically the special
forces so why is there a
disproportionate amount in the special
forces but not a disproportionate amount
in the independence movement and the
independent it is a disproportionate no
there isn't yes it is what percentage of
indigenous people support the
independence exact percentage it's not
it's not two-thirds okay tell me your
percentage it's not fifty percent about
that third tell me it could not be more
than twenty percent do you have any data
for that i'm willing to risk everything
by saying that everything yeah wow
even your soul
okay i'm already doing that by uh
debating you right now oh yeah i'm sure
you are okay so what was the second
point you made there was a second point
besides that
uh
the second point was about the history
of nation states and politics
um okay well that wasn't what was going
on but i'll address that anyway so
even if we were to disregard all
historical basis for taiwan being an
independent nation uh when it comes to
its long struggle of independence let's
just talk about modern history then the
people of taiwan struggled against
chiang kai-shek's white tara and if any
of you don't know what the white terror
is the white tariff was a system of
purges that shin kai shek and his sons
until about 1987 from about 1950. i
forget exactly when it started
purged independence advocates and
opposition to the government they were
scared that this would jeopardize their
ability to reconquer the mainland of
china since most of the independent
struggle didn't really have any interest
in invading the chinese mainland and
reconquering and so they purged them
hundreds of thousands were purged to be
exact and those people struggled for
years until the 1990s when they were
eventually able to actually get a
democracy and that history of struggle
is the history of modern taiwan
struggling against the authoritarian
system government that was in place and
then they were able to institute a
liberal democracy which they have to
this day
do you disagree with the effect of
course i disagree it's not a liberal
democracy the military might of the
kuman tang is the foundation of taiwan
as having any political independence
from the mainland whatsoever it is the
arms taken up by the kmt that has
secured that and it is for the same
reason that is the arms of the special
forces that you're talking about
made up by the pro kmt loyalists i mean
the kmt are the ones who are securing
the political independence in the first
place if these liberals want to go and
not address it and have democracy
their democracy has not secured any not
you're not the liberal democracy you're
talking about has no basis in any
sovereign power okay i don't it has no
basis in any military now
the same power that made taiwan possible
as a separate state in the first place
is something the liberal democrats have
no stronghold in whatsoever so it is
only on the basis of the ideals of the
kmt and the view that there is one china
that has kept taiwan separate from the
mainland in the first place okay you're
floundering but when it comes to can you
address the point that i'm flying you
never addressed my point what's your
point my point was that the modern
history of taiwan when it comes to the
population is a history of struggle
against the authoritarian system that
chen so let me finish please but first
you have to let you i heard what you
said i'm not i heard what you said i'm
not finished
finish go ahead dylan finish i will
finish yeah and you'll be quiet where
really will i be quiet yeah you will be
i'm bond of what
me because i'm talking because it's a
debate this conversation okay okay don't
sit here say you will be quiet well then
be quiet i'm not going to fucking be
quiet
if you tell me to be quiet i won't be
how about that okay you won't be no okay
then yell please yeah so would you
basically say yeah that's okay you can
keep yelling
you can keep fucking yelling
why didn't that democracy movement
extend to the mainland because because
there's
it's a separate territory because
okay calm down yeah that's the only
reason it's a fucking separate territory
in the first place stop swinging out and
calm down okay you're a time waster you
bullshit and waste time you're not
letting me speak you're a fucking time
waster you need to shut the fuck up
jesus christ go ahead say your piece my
god okay
so the history finally for the fifth
time the history of modern taiwan is a
history of struggle against political
authoritarianism particularly chiang
kai-shek okay
chiang kai-shek he did a white terror
against the people of taiwan and they
fought for their freedom and they earned
it through blood and sacrifice against
the government and for the last 30 years
they've held a democracy which through
that democracy and the consent of the
governed they have been able to elect
democracies and politicians represent
their interests and the vast majority of
the people within taiwan support
continuing the status quo and second if
you were to follow the status quo is the
independence when you check polling the
reason why they choose the status quo
currently over independence is purely
because if they were and i agree with
has on this to declare independence
right now
they would be bombed as shit and
millions would die it would be a
disaster that's a terrible thing by the
way that a nation and its people
declaring independence even though it's
already independence
and a bombing and destruction of a
sovereign people with its own identity
culture language that has started and
continues to separately develop what
happens
only
let's talk about that what is the
current evil that the
chinese
yeah okay so the difference between the
confederacy and when you talk about this
the evil is this from the chinese
perspective it is cutting off a piece of
china
and basically uh submitting it to
foreigners china has endured the century
of humiliation it remembers the century
of humiliation china will never submit
to the dominance of anglo-saxon
imperialists and it will uh refuse this
on bond
uh of war
so if taiwan were to commit indepe
so-called independence from china it
would become a satellite state of the
americans china is not going to tolerate
a piece of its territory being cut off
if people try to take china's territory
they're going to be met with a swift
response it's interesting that i say
people when the people were talking
about are the people who live there
those are the people who would want it
to be a sovereign nation it's not the
americans coming in and they don't
just shut the fuck up please they don't
you gotta let me speak okay
my god fucking jesus okay so the people
there
overwhelmingly and there's no data you
could provide that that rejects this do
not want to be part of the mainland
government under any circumstances only
six percent only six percent of the
population actually want reunification
eventually or immediately with the
mainland government only six percent
that means
they're the data you're going to cite i
don't know what it's for yeah there's a
beijing time yeah yeah why should i
trust the taipei times but not the
beijing times okay tell me what's wrong
with the type 8 times i can tell you
about the state funding that comes from
for certain news publications that
publish the data there's no difference
so my story
is i'm just talking about the funding
that's the difference okay what's the
funding difference taipei times isn't
funded by the taiwanese government oh
it's just funded by private corporations
that uh prop up the government okay so
there's no soul that i could talk back
first of all there's two points because
you weasel the way out of the first one
then i'm gonna address the second one
the first point is simply this you're
talking you're you're giving this uh
this sob story about the history of
democratic struggle within taiwan all of
that still rests upon the foundational
bedrock of true sovereignty sovereignty
in the true hobbsian carl schmidt sense
of sovereignty as in being able to
enforce a state of exception which is
the kmt's military might they have not
changed this foundation and the kmt is
over has founded its founding mission
was based on one china now the second
thing we're talking about is whether
which sources are um
sorry or sorry with the polling data
polls have shown that the majority of it
is true people in taiwan want to
maintain the status quo but as far as
the taiwanese people whether they want
to along the road eventually become
independent or along the road want to
join with um
with china both of these are smaller
than the percentage who say they either
don't care or
they would not care either way so what
you're saying is practically wrong both
of these people eventually independence
or eventually unification both are a
small minority of uh taiwan's uh
population okay so the first thing is on
this this hobbesian
nerd shit okay so i don't care about any
of that i'm going to be completely
honest but i can't you're not educated
okay elitist just like you don't care
about china's history okay i'd shut the
fuck up okay so the thing is i can care
about one thing and one thing only here
and that's the consent of the governed
and as a patriotic that's based on
philosophy
you don't want to talk about hobbs or
carl schmidt and don't talk about
abstract philosophical principles oh my
god like the consensus
i can test your foundational political
philosophy
you're trying to impose a stakeholder if
you don't care then don't fucking debate
well then don't simplify if you don't
want to talk to me if you don't think of
this if you want to run from the other
side of the room walk away you can walk
out because i'm talking about what i
want to talk about it's my turn i don't
care i don't care
i don't care i don't care then walk out
my god you yell a lot for a guy who's
dodging a boxing match
i'm dodging the fucking boxing yeah yeah
you are really so you want me to
dedicate six months of my time if you
spend some my streaming career to train
you fucking boxing wait wait you bosh in
substance he didn't accept no i didn't
see him
i did not no no fucking count oh really
really look at this fucking liar this
fucking liar going on record you're
saying i challenge boss yes you did you
saw my pussy for now hey no i didn't yes
first of all someone came in my fucking
chat and asked me
someone came my chat and asked me would
you fight voz for a prize money of fifty
thousand dollars or eighty thousand fuck
yeah i would then you talk
that's what i that would cover all of
the streaming all of the fucking yearly
gods i could sacrifice my streaming
career to fucking do that so of course
i'm gonna accept that furthermore you're
a fucking nobody and bosch has some
clout so there's something there to gain
from that i'm bigger than you
you're bigger than boss i'm bigger than
you how long have you been in this scene
you got all your fucking clocks from the
november election i'm rapidly rising
average 600 views i see your viewership
when i'm live you don't have more
fucking views than me i already fucking
outpaced you dylan and i've been here uh
less time than you have what happened to
the infrared showdown
what happened to the showdown is that i
came to l.a out of business one month oh
yeah oh yeah i went to l.a i went to la
for a month i went to la for a month and
got covered that's gonna be so manly
online to be such a coward how am i
coward your coward because you go out
like you're a big strong i am you wanna
fucking test me outside do you really
gonna threaten me right now i'm not i'm
saying you wanna you wanna ask from a
big man then go ahead and test me
outside you really want to go outside
and fight me right now you can test me
you're free to test my man you don't
you're free to test my manhood dylan i
use it don't assume that a fucking
boxing match with rules
don't assume a fucking boxing match with
rules is gonna be the same as the street
fighter
they all got went away okay the problem
is infrared you asked me oh here's all
the conditions you say first we're gonna
okay it's michigan it's in detroit it's
gonna be at this gym it's gonna be 10
rounds and i meet every single one of
the things you asked me but i have a box
no it's not and then you asked me well i
know how to defend the dna and now
you're gonna have power yes go get them
i have the yeah i challenge you do you
challenge everyone i have the dna
can we go back to the topic i have the
dnx
so here's what happened
actually here's what happened
it was 3 a.m
my time in l.a this psychopath clipping
loser he's up at 6 00 am all night he's
seething about me thinking about me i
was banned on twitch i forgot who this
fucking guy was he dms me he goes what a
weirdo he goes look at this
uh i'm scrolling to it he says let's
have a boxing match out of who i'm i'm
i'm with my boy jackson on his roof
smoking a cigar i get this fucking dm
let's have a boxing match it'll be fun
and then three yeah then i said then i
said okay
need one month minimum for training and
promotion so you agree that's reasonable
you agree you're right you're right
but nobody told me you had experience
wait so the problem is you
listen listen hold on hold on if you
don't recognize that boxing is about
experience you're a fucking idiot boxing
is all about experience that works it's
not a street fight it's not a fucking
street fight it's not something like
that it's not just something you do mma
then mma is not a street fight either so
literally you're just saying let's go
into an alleyway and fight would you
know i if you want no no i'm saying if
you want to test my manhood that's on
you well i just think you're a coward
and you backed out of it because then
you learn to know how to defend myself
why are you worth it to me because you
travel around you challenge all these
people do what you challenged
for example you're you said you go to
argentina yeah and i say i'll go to your
city because you're just because you're
confused yeah yeah yeah because i was
willing to go there for him because i
hate the guy that much uh-huh yeah and
you accept my boss so it's worth it
you somehow it's worth it you dodged it
because you're excited let's continue
you're not a reason
you just you're just saying go ahead go
ahead go ahead you can keep talking
about it you look like a fat fucker
he kept asking me 21 questions like
what's your weight class where do you
want to have it how many rounds do you
want to have schedule and i was just
responding to you i didn't impose all
these fucking conditions on you
i made sure that all that they did you
said 10 rounds and i say hey that's
ridiculous because you don't know
anything and then and then you're like
no we have to do 10 rounds i'll make
sure no what you said is that anything
about it you said a gym would not allow
ten right now of course i said i could
find i said i could pan around i said i
know of the gyms in detroit that will
tolerate 10 rounds and i'll get that i
didn't force the condition
i didn't force any conditions if you had
a problem with that you could have said
so and i agree okay i think where we've
gotten with this is there may be a
boxing match in the future
[Applause]
with that being said now you guys had
loved a little bit about the
will of the people the history of china
let's wrap it up for the next few
minutes closing that one if we could
avoid the boxing discussion
and so we'll do that and open it up to
questions and answers at that point so
yeah taiwan is not a country the
overwhelming majority of sovereign
countries in the world if not almost
pretty much all of them don't recognize
it as one they recognize it as a vague
breakaway province that's still
struggling with the the central
government of china
the country of taiwan supposed country
of taiwan the official government is
called the republic of china there has
never been a significant dispute as to
whether there is one china or not this
issue has been forced by the americans
and it's as simple as that both the kmt
which founded taiwan as a separate
political territory and the communist
party of china
both have always agreed there is only
one china the pro-independence movement
has never actually changed the
foundation of uh taiwan as being based
in the foundational ideals of sun
yat-sen which are also shared by the
communist party of china
okay so the first thing about
international recognition that needs to
be noted here is international
recognition matters not at all in my
opinion when it comes to designating
whether a nation is a nation or not a
nation because if that's the case then
the mainland was not a country until
what 1971 when it was admitted to the
united nations or was it a country when
the vast majority when the majority of
nations finally tipped from taiwan to
china mainland china that is when it
comes to recognizing what country is it
isn't the actual china because if that's
the case then what we're saying is that
the mainland government wasn't a country
until 1971 but 1970 it totally wasn't a
country even though it had all the
trappings of the country international
recognition doesn't matter as much to me
when it comes to this definitely when it
comes to the idea of like well what
about these superpowers that recognize
well america doesn't recognize it that
doesn't matter to me it doesn't matter
to me at all if every nation in the
world tomorrow said we no longer
recognize the united states and as a
nation that doesn't mean the united
states is no longer a nation-state it
has all the trappings of a nation-state
and when you look at taiwan it has its
own language it has its own separate
history it has its language
yes you don't know about
seventy percent taiwanese language you
don't know that how is it a separate
language they speak consciousness
okay you don't know what you're talking
about anyway there's dialects of han
chinese it's my outro it's my outro okay
so fucking stupid yeah you are you're
right okay so the thing is
they have all the trappings of a modern
state
they've struggled for to build a
separate system of governance a
democracy within taiwan against an
authoritarian system
they've seen the offer from haaz and his
buddies the two cunt one country two
systems they saw it play out in hong
kong
and the support for independence
skyrocketed after seeing the result of
that because they don't want that for
their future and let's say that
everything every single thing has said
about the history of taiwan is
completely true
the united states did not exist until
1776. nations can be built with complex
cultures and history in the blink of an
eye through revolution and civil
geopolitical strife and so what i'm
saying here is since they developed
their own culture they've the taiwanese
identity is a distinct identity now and
if you pull the people on taiwan they
identify as taiwanese majority not
chinese some identify as both they will
say that they have their own system of
governance they have their own judicial
system they have their own everything
saying it is not an independent country
is plain pretend which i know communists
like to do a lot so that'll be that all
right well thank you both for that
interesting conversation lively
before we open it up for question and
answer i will say please if you have a
question
not dealing with the boxing match feel
free to come forward
if it's dealing with the boxing match
we'll handle those at the end so uh if
you'll just stand in the middle you
don't have to be on one side or the
other so
other than the other side will come up a
uh questions for infrared
do you believe that it's morally right
for taiwan to be independent
no
and why
uh
i don't think the uh
people have a right to arbitrarily
secede
simply based on uh
it's a betrayal of china to china's
enemies so i'm against this kind of
betrayal simple as that can i get
counterfeit they could say the same
thing about america in 1776 but our
rebellion was moral because we knew that
the system of government that the king
had was fundamentally wrong because we
wanted it it has nothing to do with the
material taxation without representation
nothing to do with the material factors
taxation without representation is wrong
and as a patriot as you describe
yourself you should know that
the taiwan system would be preserved
under one country two systems
in hong kong in hong kong they passed an
extradition bill and there was a western
fueled unrest and chaos
in order to restore law and order the
police of hong kong had to crack down on
what happened during what happened
during the riots of black lives matter
and january 6 was this all an
infringement upon the rights of the
american people
that the police cracked down on this was
unrest was it in refrigeration and many
times yes actually police brutality is a
major issue in this country yes but does
that represent does it represent the
same level of oppression look you told
me to stop overspending yeah
so let's go ahead to the next question
so i haven't had much time to formulate
this question but it's something like uh
and i think for infrared first but i'd
like both opinion from both is um
what
is there actually going to be a benefit
to say china as a whole or maybe if you
want to say the world as a whole for
china to kind of completely take over
taiwan i feel like the people of taiwan
kind of like hong kong when their rules
start coming into play the taiwanese
gonna be like wait a minute that's more
kind of oppressive than we're used to
we're used to these more free more
freedoms there's gonna be a lot of very
under a whole
it's an island nation isn't it taiwanese
as a whole island nation of very unhappy
people with new oppressive laws being
put upon them and i don't know how like
who's happy about i feel like the
chinese are going to do it's going to be
messy for them it's going to be messy
for the time why do it at all where's
what's the best so um
i have to preface this in the first
place it's not about fucking business
what china does
uh to its own territory because we are
not china we're a separate country and
we have to mind our own business and
take care of our own people so it's the
first thing that's most important but
secondly
in case it matters china has no
intention of forcing laws or forcing its
system on a people that don't want it
what china is interested in and
conserving is its geopolitical and
territorial sovereignty china does not
want foreigners to meddle in its affairs
and attempt to seize hegemony over uh
china's sovereignty and china's
territory and so on and so on china
wants to protect itself from people who
have a history of express military
hostility antagonism toward china simply
for being an independent rising power
that is disrupting the american uh
world order of hegemony so china's first
and foremost interest is preserving
sovereignty its interest is not imposing
an ideology or system
which is not of any real importance
china knows that it can't impose a
system on a people that don't want it so
that's why the one country two systems
was even uh implemented in the first
place
so when it comes to the idea that it's
not really our issue
we have had a historical relationship
with the taiwanese government that goes
past multiple administrations a refugee
crisis across from the taiwan strait
would be a disaster not only for the
world but especially the united states
considering that taiwanese community is
quite large in california i'm pretty
sure a lot of them would like to take
their family members because they
wouldn't want to be either politically
persecuted or blown up since again if
you were to exclude the mountainous
terrain taiwan would be the number one
most dense country in the world with a
population of 25 million to put that in
perspective syria has a population of 20
had a population of 20 million before
the civil war and was the 67th most
dense country in the world and so when
we talk about what would be a largely
air campaign in taiwan that would be a
humanitarian disaster creates a massive
refugee crisis this doesn't even need to
talk about our trade relationship with
taiwan our interest there or
semiconductors with 50 of the world
semiconductors being produced by the
tsmc which of course is based in taiwan
which right now with supply line
shortages
that being bombed as shit or us not
having access to that would also be a
massive issue for the united states when
it comes to the idea it's not our
business also china's extremely
hypocritical when it comes to this point
because it says that well this is a
civil war and
has correctly technically states that it
is technically a historical ongoing
civil war the mainland
not even in the same way that it is in
korea though because there's tourism
across state across lines there's
there's workers from taiwan working
within there the tourism industry is
gigantic they trade over like 200
billion dollars and i think in the last
20 or 30 years alone so obviously a
civil war where you're trading tourism
it doesn't really sound like a very
bloody civil war that's currently going
on there has been violence in 75 years
but let's say let's pretend that it's a
civil war for a moment right that it's
not just you know on paper
in myanmar right now there is what is if
you would be honest a civil war
one-third of the country occurred in the
cernan alice one-third of the country
according to cernan analyst is
controlled by rebel forces that are
fighting against the military
dictatorship that overthrew the
democratically elective government of
aung san soon this is irrelevant let me
finish chinese involvement in the civil
war what does that evolve let me finish
military intervention or arms deals
so
they have sent aid to the military
government that's exactly they have sold
weapons to the military government which
they then used to not only ethically
cleanse minorities in the country but
put down rebellions and what is our
involvement when it comes to taiwan
through the taiwan relations act for
example much worse mostly
sending them weapons through trade deals
the exact same thing they're doing with
their involvement in an active ongoing
civil war where people are dying right
now if they're allowed to do something
troops are in taiwan us troops are in
taiwan not officially but they are and
what about do you want to talk about
they are secretly and covertly they are
secretly and convert these training
operations well maybe because yeah
independent nation they're allowed to
have that okay well china you're saying
china's two-faced for selling arms and
giving aid to because they're made
because they because what they do but it
has friendly relationships government
they have yeah and an ongoing civil war
they're taking sides also the status quo
in that country is the government it's
the government that's military you're
telling me the military
china through democracy
china works china worked with the shah
of iran and then it worked with the
ayatollahs china works with whoever is
in power and it doesn't care about the
internal political uh then then america
just works with what's in power in
taipei no it doesn't because america
because america has a specific agenda to
meddle in china's affairs and promote
independence of china i know the chinese
are meddling in these they don't china
is very pragmatic
what about with the china factories and
the only time the chinese got interested
it was like never mind we really need to
stop was when their factories getting
burned down they don't care that their
guns are being used to mow down probably
yeah they can china care they will help
them we could learn from china china
help mow down china china cares about
china america should care about america
so we should sell more weapons to saudi
arabia then because it's very profitable
all right i think that's good stuff
right there i believe you had the next
question sir
so this is for both of you and it's kind
of a broader question we touched on it a
bit but i want to ask directly kind of
what justifies sovereignty for a
government what what legitimizes the
government what kind of factors go into
whether we should support government
this is an issue not just in taiwan but
also across the world like in ukraine
and israel and palestine so this this is
a uh philosophical question
and the german theorist carl schmidt
does not define sovereignty based on
some kind of external measurement
sovereignty is in short as hobbs pointed
out based on material realities
sovereignty is based on a monopoly on
violence it's based on force it's based
on might it's not based on some
independent
source verifying the sovereignty now you
could talk about other countries
recognizing your sovereignty which is an
important thing but sovereignty is based
in material not moral
or ethical realities
yeah and the material reality is that
taiwan's government is what controls
the island of taiwan that's mature and
let them try and recognize it as a
nation
let them try and declare independence
and see what happens say wait so if it
walks like a horse talks like a horse
and it's everything like a horse but it
doesn't say i'm a horse is it or is it
not a horse it's not a horse yet because
it's not allowed to have us troops on
its soil officially so you're so if i
said so if everybody in here said this
isn't a phone would you be like oh i
guess taiwan is literally restricted
from doing things a sovereign nation
could do officially because the chinese
government has tried to do that on the
international stage but by the
way can't have troops on its soil you
cannot have u.s troops
so what you're saying is that the
chinese government the mainland
government in 1916 it doesn't was like a
horse it doesn't walk like what is the
chinese horse can have troops on its oil
officially i don't know
i don't know if any horse that has
troops on its soil but what i will say
if that's what you're saying then you
would have to recognize that in 1960 to
make the government in the mainland
china was not a legitimate nation
because it did not have large-scale
international recognition or a seat at
the united nations
the people's republic of china was not a
nation because it didn't have
international recognition yeah
well that was that didn't reflect the
material reality which the world
eventually woke up and adjusted to that
the overwhelming majority of the chinese
people are under the sovereignty of the
communist party so eventually they woke
up to that reality and is that going to
happen with taiwan international
recognition wait wait
wait keep waiting for that to happen for
taiwan
you mentioned that china doesn't like to
impose things on people that they don't
want it something like that
um except the uyghurs taiwan hong kong
they're building islands where does
china's border actually end because you
mentioned the early historical qing
borders that were carved up by the
british and other uh colonialists but as
far as the oyo situation is concerned
xinjiang has been part of china for
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of
years so that is the people who have
already been under the system and
sovereignty of the communist party for a
very very long time so my point is
they're not going to go to another
territory and impose their system
the voyagers have already been living
under the system now if you don't like
the details of how that system has been
executed so far it's a separate question
but they have already been living under
the system
why would you trust the colonialists to
draw up the borders because the
scarborough shoal for example which
china claims is mostly used by filipino
fishermen and is claimed by the
philippines in international courts
which china represents those
international reports are illegitimate
because i didn't interrupt the
territories
between china in
has the philippines
in a bilateral matter it is not under
the jurisdiction of the international
and you want to know why
in that bilateral matter they lost and
then they disrupted they didn't yeah
they did lose they came to an agreement
with the philippines the philippines
didn't like it so they ran to the u.n
and then the u1 said what it doesn't
matter in china
it doesn't matter because you wouldn't
have no sovereign plan the u.n the u.n
has no sovereignty
the u.n has no sovereignty to execute
its authority over bilateral legislation
so u.n recognition on by the u.n when it
comes to taiwan no that matters because
it's not a unilateral matter
it is a bilateral matter between the
philippines and china which was
arbitrated between
and then real quick china i'll let you
some bad then you like the last word but
again getting back to the whole
recognition thing so it sounds like we
could have a follow-on here but
before we go to the next question go
ahead the people in xinjiang do not like
being monitored in every aspect of their
life and they are they don't even know
your own sources admit it's not true
anymore
let them finish you'll have something
you're saying that my sources say that
there have not been an
extreme increase in the level of
moderation no it's true they're not
claiming it's all it's all done not even
letting me you didn't even let me talk
jesus okay
so
in xinjiang these are things that are
undisputable fact even according to the
chinese government when it comes to the
monitoring of street cameras and the
everyday life of uyghurs the chinese
government has heavily ramped up
monitoring them this has been claimed
that this is needed to do for
anti-terrorism measures but that does
not mean it's been recepted accepted
with open arms by the local population
another thing is the banning of certain
religious uh i would say religious
activities now specifically are you up
to date on your sources because they're
now saying all that's they're not saying
they know they're not saying they've
eased up they're not they're not saying
what i'm yes they have now let me finish
they said they've
is much newer than anglo-saxon
liberalism from the 16th century
okay we're getting off topic in there so
next question
so uh my question is to uh to infrared
here and it seems like your entire
moralistic world view is based on might
makes right and material conditions it's
i'm a materialist it's not about
michael's right okay but you keep making
you keep bringing up the fact that uh
the
the reason that china has the southern
authority that it does is because it has
a monopoly on power it's able to exert
its control over people etc etc which is
a might makes right argument so if the
material conditions are what
basically says what exists and might
makes right then wouldn't it be uh
in america's best interest to go
imperialistic again and take over taiwan
in response to china since that's what
china
wants to do there is a country that has
tried this
i understand the point of well i just
want to make it sure for the rest of you
okay
so uh the
white house china has been doing with
other countries that border it's the
border rights such as tibet uh such as
vietnam the 60s and her 70s or rather
such as uh like dylan myanmar or burma
so so okay so tibet has never bordered
china it's always been a part of china
now in regards to other border disputes
china has always settled these matters
not only in a way that's fair but in a
way that overwhelmingly benefits the
countries it's negotiating with china
seated like 80 percent of its territory
in one of its borders with uh
afghanistan for example right so when
china gets to the books and say we have
to settle this territorial dispute china
is very generous with negotiations and
has proven so now regarding myanmar and
vietnam there was a border dispute with
vietnam in the 70s
but that's what it was it was a border
dispute it wasn't some kind of
arbitrary imperialist encroachment it
was a dispute about territory that could
not be solved diplomatically finally as
to the question of mike makes right you
can say why doesn't america just use its
might to invade the entire world there's
a country that has tried the precedent
of just simply hey we can do it let's do
it it was the german the nazi germans
they tried this in world war ii
it was proven that this is not a path uh
countries and states can take just to
completely circumvent the customs and
norms which are a material reality as
well
um that are in place because when you
declare war against the entire world
you're going to have a world war and
you're going to have the world to unite
against you
so america can try this it just wouldn't
be very wise
so just a follow up on that i'm just
specifically talking about taiwan here
yeah within
it would not be good for america within
regards to taiwan the taiwanese people
seem to be as dylan is saying uh against
china taking back part of it if america
isn't it america's interest as long as
well as the taiwanese interests to join
forces to provide why is it in our
interests
because of things like dylan said with
the chip manufacturing the uh the
territory there will be no alteration to
the ship manufacturing under chinese uh
but we have examples china's already
replicating taiwan's chip industry at
home anyway well that but that gives
more power to china
having it more because then we would
want our own our own ability to take in
ships from a separate country we already
can do that we don't need to invade
taiwan to do that
you don't need to understand the world
invade if america wants to replicate the
chips that taiwan produces it can do so
in the same way that china by trading
and recognizing them as a sovereign
nation no because china doesn't do that
and yet it's able to make its own
domestic chips this is a dead-end
argument let me ask you about something
because you said that they always
resolve these conflicts uh like fairly
now if you said most of the time maybe
it would be easier but the scarborough
shoal was very self-evident where they
took their ships they put them on the
scoreboard shoal then told the filipinos
you want to fish here this is what's
been historically your fishing territory
you
gotta just come to the table and agree
with us on all this stuff then the
filipinos come to the table after the
united nations says hey you know you're
a member state and you agreed to follow
these rules china what about all this
kind of just disregarded them the
international organization which you use
as a justification to say what is it
isn't a nation state due to that
internet
yes yes you did international
recognition was part of your argument i
said it's a factor it's not determining
the united nations is definitely
considered the united nations is not the
determining factor
the international community is concerned
one of the determining factors on the
internet china has contested u.n is part
of the internet the china has contested
the jurisdiction of the u.n in that case
in that uh hearing because the city
because it was settled bilaterally and
if you want to know if the china act
unjustly china is simply returning to
the status quo that existed before the
british arbitrarily came with their guns
and their opium to carve up what if
that's what if the
alongside alongside the qing empire
alongside the rest of the european union
what if the qing empire was you know an
empire and therefore a lot of the
territory it invaded it shouldn't
actually have had control of i've
actually debated with you about this
you're so historically illiterate that
you don't understand the structure of
pre-modern empires and the manner by
which they went about territorial
conquest annexation assimilation
is entirely different from european
colonialism if you don't understand that
you are
simply historically illiterate with that
we're coming up against your time block
here so did you have a question yes uh
one final question so go ahead and if
you stand between the camera set so that
mike's can pick it up
yeah
my question is well for both of you and
you know america
we're known for having really chat
energy from separating from britain
so
why not respect the chat energy of the
taiwanese
and
let them separate from china why why why
why try to stick up for the guy who lost
because the circumstances are entirely
different between the
material conditions that gave rise to
the american independence and the
so-called independence movement within
taiwan now
china is a 5 000 year long civilization
united states broke with the uk which
colonized the new world very recently
and because the people of uh america
became indigenized and nationally
culturally civilizationally different
from the people in the united kingdom
after centuries and centuries of
indigenization this process has not
occurred whatsoever in taiwan in taiwan
taiwanese people and the chinese people
are the same people they engage in trade
marriage
personal relations cultural exchange the
same movies and tv they watch the same
music they listen to they're the same
exact people
who are under the uh different
uh ideological governments
the time of these people disagree with
them they identify culturally now more
as taiwanese all the polling data shows
that uh also the reason why they don't
like the chat taiwanese is because
they're swinging out
thank you
and with that i'd like to thank both of
you for making this more lively
stay tuned for further information on
the boxing match
appreciate everybody's uh professional
questions
actually