The time is now.

Scyria,

Scyria, Arden Tartaria, our land Tartaria, be free Tartaria, our land Cartaria. mountain mountain home and through the ice and snow

we'll make you proud again

Tarteria

Arland Tarteria

Be free Tarteria be free tartaria our land tartaria You yellow stone And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Tarteria

Our land Tarteria

Be free Tarteria Be free Carteria

Our land Tarteria

Mountain Rome

They call to the yellow stone

And through the ice and snow

Will make you proud again

Tarania

Our land Tarteria

Be free Tarotaria

Our land Citeria

Mountain Road

They called you yellow

And through the ice and smoke They called you Yellow's flow

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Charteria

All that Tarteria be free tarteria

mountain home they called you Yellowstone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Tartaria

Rland Tartaria mountain tarteria Arland Tarteria

Be free Tarteria Mountain hole They called you yellow

Stone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Tarteria

Ha

Ha! Land! Ha!

Ha!

He breathed Tartaria

Hey!

Ha'land Tartaria

Mountain hole

They called you

Yellowstone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Tartaria Island Arland Tarteraria Island

Arland Tarantaria Island

Be free Tarotterian

Island

Island Tarantaria

Mountain Holes

They called you yellow stone

And through the ice and snow

Will make you proud again

Tartaria Allent Tartaria

Allent Tartaria

Be free Tartaria

Allent Tartaria

Mountain Ho! Mountain Ho! Wait! Hey! Mountaineau Mountain hole

They call you yellow

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Zyterian honor make you proud again. Tarteria, Ireland, Ireland,

Tarantaria, Ireland,

these free, Tararia,

Arland,

Mediterranean

Mountain home mountain home they call you yellow mountain home

they called you yellow stone

and through the ice

and stone will make you proud again

Tarterium We'll make you proud again Tartarian

A

Arland Tarterian

He Be free Tarteria

A

Atlant Tarian

Locked in Homeless

Counting Rome

They called you yellow

Then through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

oh

Cartaia

Our land Tartaria Mountaintopoe Mountaine Mountain hall

mountain hole mountain home

They called you

Yellowstone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you

proud again

Tartaria

Arland Tarteria

Be free

Tartavia

A La La Tartaria Be freed Taravia Alameda Alamed

Tavalia

Tau Tavia

Mounds

and home

they call

through

yellow and through the

ice

and snow

will make you proud living

Tartaria

A-O-Land-Tartaria

Be free Targaryo

Or Atlanta

Tertaria

Mountain Hole

They called you

Yellow Stone

And through the ice

and snow

we'll make you proud

again

Tarterio

I'll land

Tarteria

Be free Tarteria Ah Lentartaria The free

Tarteria

A Lentartaria

Mountain Hole

They call you

Yellowstone And through the ice and snow They called you a yellow stone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you brought in

Tartaria

Alland Tartelia Be free Tartagnetia Highland Titia I can't be free

Tartaria

Highland Tartaria

Ha!

Mountain homes

May call you

Yellow Stone

And through the ice and snow

We'll make you proud again

Tarteria

Than Tarteria Island

Tarterian

Be free

Tarteria

I'm

Tarantia

Oh

I know

to who and...

Settledsohn Salazar. are prepare for launch

the stars are calling

glasses down

anchor up.

Glasses down, anchor up.

Salazar.

Salazar.

Glass, the planets of glasses wears.

Settled star,

Settled star, intergalactic years zero zero hero hero hero

hero

hero

hero

hero

zero

zero

zero

zero

zero zero so so Salus

Prepare for lunch

The stars are calling

Glasses down, anchor up.

Glasses down and curl.

Salazar.

Salazar Salazar Salazar Glass

the planets

Of glasses

Where'd

Cellusar

Intergalactic years

Zero

Zero Zero

Zero

Salo

Star

Oh

So Star Cello star Prepare for launch

The stars

The glasses

Down, anchor Glass Glasses down anchor

Glasses down anchor

Salazar

Salazar

Glass planets

glasses wears Glass planets Of glass is worse

Salazar

Intercollar

Intercollect

Here's zero

Bureau Bureau

Bureau Zero

Selelele Selele Sall Pell of Star Cello the Star

Seto Prepare for launch.

The stars are calling.

Glasses down, anchor up.

Glasses down, anchor up. Yeah. thank girl glasses down

thinker

salazar

glass the planets are

of glasses

of glasses wears

salazar glasses wears Sadal Tsar

Intercollect

Kier's hero

Bealbizu

Bealbueu

Real

Real

Yeah

Sala

Prepare for launch

Stars are called

Glasses down and grow

Glasses down and grow

Saddle Tsars Glasses down and grow Salazar

Solotaur

Glass planets

Of glasses

words

Salalts are

Settles are Intergalactic Cellulps are

Intergalactic here

Zero

Zero Zero

Prepaure for launch

The stars are calling

Glasses down, anchor up

Glasses down, anchor

Cells Cells Cells

Cells Claims

The planets

Of glasses Where's

Cellars

Are

Intergalactic

Year Zero

Zero Sollops

Prepare for launch.

Stars are calling.

Glasses down and grow.

Glasses down anchor.

Cellars are.

Glass.

Planets of glasses.

Of glasses, weir. Cellars. glass planets of glasses

weird

Celalzar

Celadzar into galactic years

Hero

Hero hero hero hero

hero hero hero

hero hero zero

Zero

Seralstar

prepare for launch

The stars are called

Glasses down, anchor up

Glasses down, anchor up

Salazar

Glass is the planets

Of glasses Of glasses

Words

Celotaur

Selotsar Inter-galactic

Year's hero

Selotaur

Prepare for March

The stars are calling

Glasses down anchor

Glasses down anchor of Salazar

Glass is the planets

Of glasses wear us

Salazar, Salazar, Salazar,

Salazar,zalzar

Intergalactic here

Zero

Sadalzar

Prepare for launch

The stars are calling

glasses down

and curl

glasses down and curl

Salazar

Salazar

glass Glasses down and curl Glasses down and curl Salads are

Sals

Glass, the planets

of glasses

Where is

Salazar, cells are

Intergalactic

Year Zero

Prepare Star Intergalactic year's hero Prepare for launch

The stars are calling

Glasses down and grow up

Glasses down and grow up

Seven stars

Glass is the planets Of glasses where Seven Stars Glass The planets

Of glasses

Wares

Seven Sar

To collect

Year is zero

So

So

Prepare for launch the stars are are calling glasses down, anchor,

glasses down, anchor, and good, glasses, down, anchor,

so, zero, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, so, Cellular, collect the key of zero.

Cellular.

Prepare for launch the stars of color. Grass, down the pinker,

grass, down, anchor.

Cellar stars.

Cellar.

Glass, the planets

of glasses

wearers

settles stars

intergalactic year zero

subtle stars

prepare from watch the stars

call it glasses down and grow are calling glasses down and grow up

Glasses down and grow up

Cello stars, cello Cells the planets

of glasses

spirits

Salo Tso

Cellot

Cells are Intergalactic here

Zero

Settles are

Prepare for launch the stars

crawling glasses down

In girl

Glasses on and girl

Glasses on and girl Settlesar

Glass is the planet

of glasses

where

the planet I'm I'm

I'm and my love Oh, no. Oh.

Uh-da-da-na-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh-uh.

Oh-da-go-do.

Oh-da-l-l-you-no. Oh Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh

Oh

And and the other people and a lot of nothing.

And I'm not going to be

I'm going to be a

I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm going to be able to be able to be. and the uh...

I'm

I'm I'm I'm going to

I'm

and

I'm

I'm I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to go.

I'm going to

I'm going

I'm

I'm I'm going to I'm

I'm

and

I'm The

I'm not

I'm going to

I'm

going to

I'm

Oh John the bug guy.

What's going on, bro?

How are you doing?

I have to tell you guys something really important.

I didn't think you would have to come to this, but unfortunately I have to share some incredible news.

I didn't think it would come to this.

Rifle, what's up?

We're at a decisive juncture and we're at a decisive moment and I didn't think I would have to talk about this.

J.B. Wolf with the 10, what's up, man?

And so the thing I have to tell you about to get it off my chest

and you have to hear it now

if you're not going to hear it now

it's now or never

type of thing.

Islam is taking over America.

Sharia law is coming.

Abdul al-Saiya just won yesterday,

his primary. The Muslim hordes are unstoppable sharia law is coming

is taking over there are any true americans left like me true white americans who are left who are, we have to proudly wear the infidel hat and stop the Sharia law from happening.

If they take away our bacon, if they take away our beer, they're going to make women cover up.

And that sucks because I love staring at big booty, you know.

It's going to be terrible.

It's going to be terrible.

Imagine you're going to go out at night in Miami and Houston.

You're not going to be able to see all that.

They're going to be covering up all that.

You ain't going to be seeing nothing.

There's not going to be no bacon. Say goodbye to the diners. Say goodbye to beer.

Just going to be an Islamic Sharia law country. And that's just what's happening. Sharia law is

taken over. Islam is taken over. The brown happening sharia law is taken over is

taken over the brown muslim hordes are taken over there's nothing we can do about it

is taking over america islam is taking over America.

Abdul al-Sayyah just won.

And then there's this guy, he's some Arab, Muslim Arab, named Hazaldeen, the chairman of the Communist Party.

And this foreigner has the audacity.

He dares, come to our country.

And now he's talking about some nonsensical Islamic, mystical extremism that he's combining the two greatest

enemies of America, Islam and communism.

And he's talking all this nonsense.

He's saying that the Yellowstone Caledra

is actually the Mount Kaff,

the Emerald

Mountain from Sufi mysticism and

from Iranian folklore.

He's saying that

he's basically creating this

form of Islam in our land, in own country we need to stop Islam and worship Israel and Netanyahu all about that you need to understand Israel now they're just like Muslims or they're like zombies and Israel is just defending

their God

given right because they're the people of the

Bible. When I went to church there's a whole lot

of dimensions of Israel

when I went to church.

When I opened the Bible, they're talking a whole

lot about Israel and the Bible

but you know what they're not talking about

some crazy nonsense

that Hazaldine's talking about. The Kisalbos

and the Yellowstone

Emerald Mountain

all that is crazy.

Get it out of here.

Deport all the Muslims, including this Hazaldine, this foreigner, is trying to impose this foreign religion and foreign thing on our country.

We need to stop it from happening.

Jackson Hinkle is a brown Muslim.

He wears eye contacts to look like he has blue eyes.

He's actually a Muslim because all Muslims are brown.

All Muslims are non-white.

He got some advanced Iranian cosmetic surgery to blend in with us white people.

And we need to talk about Jackson Hinkle because us white people, we're sick of being

infiltrated by people like Jackson Hinkle.

He's actually an

Arab. He got cosmetic surgery

to blend in with us white people.

Comrade Slim,

what's up?

You know, the greatest part is I could

get away with going to

anti-Sheria rally and I could get away with, I could get away with going to anti-Sheria rally,

and I could get away.

They wouldn't, how are they going to know?

I could just say, I could just say I'm one of them.

How are they going to know?

How are they know?

Well, Abdul al-Sayyad won on a serious note,

and that's kind of going to set the tone and set the theme of this stream, actually,

because we have a lot to talk about,

because you guys are not up to date. There's a whole lot of the things you're not up to date on you're not on code about you're not familiar

with you're not aware of them but there's a lot of shifts happening in the country right now

a lot of things are happening and you need to be filled in and you need to properly understand what the infrared response to everything is what the ACP response ought to be.

Frankly speaking, what about the American Communist Party and its

role in all of this, right? So this is where we're at. We're going to have to have a long

discussion about it, a long lecture about it, and this is not going to be a stream you're going to

want to miss. This is going to be a stream you're going to want to miss this is going to be an

important one and if you do miss it you're a fucking retard that's all i could tell you you're

a fucking retard you're not going to make it don't miss this shit this is going to be important

okay because we have to talk about what's

going on in the midterms abdul el-sayyad is somebody that i remembered running in 2018 in the democratic

primaries and he lost and i was shocked was actually shocked that he lost that he lost, and I was shocked.

I was actually shocked that he lost at that time.

And it actually changed my perspective a lot that led to the Maga-Communism trajectory.

I started to realize that the progressive wing of the Democratic Party didn't really have a chance, that they were not tapping into the working class demographic, that the duopoly was basically gatekeeping what they call the center, the people that could swing from, you know, independence, all those kind of people, and that there was something fatally wrong with the strategy of the progressives and the DSA types in their attempt to build hegemony through the Democratic Party. But now we're living in an era where for the first time ever,

progressive wing of the Democratic Party and the DSA is quickly winning.

Now, there's some details we ought to keep in mind and pay attention to that are of critical importance to not lose focus on understand the fact that abdul el-sayyad is slated to lose the

midterms versus his Republican opponent.

Now that's the fucking problem.

He won the primary against the Democrat,

but in a swing state like Michigan,

if Syed loses the Senate to whatever his fucking name is,

then that's going to discredit across the entire country Senate to whatever his fucking name is, then

that's going to discredit across

the entire country, the progressive

wing of the Democratic Party and the

DSA, and it's going to bolster

the forces within the Democratic Party

to do their post-midterm perch.

The whole argument right now is that they're only capable of winning in already solidly blue places.

But in swing states like Michigan and elsewhere throughout the country, the argument is that these types of people who are progressives and our DSA and so on and so on don't have a fucking chance, right?

That's the basic argument that they're going with.

If Abdul al-Siyahid loses the Senate and the midterms, that is going to be, that's the race I want everyone to focus on.

I don't think there's a single other race in a swing state where a DSA adjacent progressive has won.

So Michigan, all lies on Michigan, we have to see the outcome of that to know how the Democratic Party is going to be moving.

Because I think after the midterms, they're going to do their purge.

And I think they're going to justify that purge on the basis of that specific type of politics being discredited in the swing state that Michigan is.

And I've seen the ads.

There's a lot of Arabs in Michigan.

There's a lot of Muslims.

There's also a lot of white progressives.

But unfortunately, all he has to do is play those racist ads toward

Abdul al-Sayyid, and you have to see some of them. They're kind of funny. They're playing the scary

music, like the scary Middle East terrorist music

And it's

We'll go over it

Actually we should

We should watch it right now actually

Yeah it's actually remarkable you need to understand the tone that we're working with

what is this guy's name

what is Stephen no what's the guy's name

the Republican guy

Mike Rogers

yeah you Mike Rogers Yeah, you got to look at this and see it for yourself, okay?

Now, I don't know if the ad is even posted on YouTube, if I'm going to be honest.

I have no fucking idea.

Yeah, going

up against Mark, Mike Rogers, not going to

be the same thing, and you're going to learn why I'm

even telling you about all this shit.

Okay, well, I saw it on TikTok.

I can't seem to find it on Google, on the internet.

But in any case, they're making him seem like he's like Osama bin Laden.

And that could work in a place like Michigan.

That could work. Maybe it won't maybe it will

a lot of the masses are at the level where there's a profound fear of Islam there's a profound

many Americans are afraid of Islam, they're scared of it and

those are for reasons

that are probably only understood by

thinkers like Franz Fanon.

I think the reason many

Americans fear Islam is not

even for any

reason. It's not even racism per reason. It's not even racism, per se. It's the inability to categorize and compartmentalize Islam. They don't know what Islam is. They're not familiar with it. They can't assimilate it within this rationally mediated, discursive universe.

So they have no way of making sense of this unknown.

It's like a burqa, which is a completely unknown thing, right?

So Islam is just this like nagging blind spot in their perfectly rationally categorized reality

where they're used to black people, they're used to Mexicans, they're used to be able,

they can categorize all these other ethnicities in groups that

conform to various different stereotypes

but what is the stereotype of a Muslim?

The stereotype of a Muslim is that

they have bombs and they blow shit up.

Think about that. Everyone's

stereotype is more or less rooted

in something rational.

I mean, even racist stereotypes that are created by the right wing.

Let's talk about their stereotypes toward Mexicans.

They say Mexicans work at Home Depot and they hop the border.

Well, because a rational person wants to make a living.

They say Jews love money. Okay, well, who doesn't love money? They say the Chinese, I mean,

the stereotype is the Chinese are good in math or something, right? Well, that's perfectly

something you can understand and relate

to.

But Muslims and Arabs

who just bomb shit and blow shit up,

there's no way to rationalize that.

So it's this irrational thing.

It's this inability to

categorize, right? That

Franz Fanon talks about

which you have uniquely with Islam, right?

Master, what's up?

And that's really where

a lot of this is coming from

oh my god slava thank you so much for the five i appreciate you so much

so we basically

oh with the six thank you so much, Slav. I appreciate you.

So you basically have a unique fear of Islam because there's an opening in Islam is ascendant worldwide, whether we want to talk about it or not.

There's a lot of energy coming from the Islamic world right now because the the world has

not the confrontation between the modern world and Islam has not happened yet it's happened with

China it's happened with Russia it's happened with others but the world of Islam is uncharted territory.

So as the world confronts Islam still, the modern age does, there's a lot of energy that's being

harnessed and coming from that. And there's a lot of fear. You know, the thing that happened in

Spain that was orchestrated by Israel with all the Muslims,

the Moroccans running into the old Spanish city in Africa that they still have, that's a thing.

I don't even want to touch that question.

Because on the one hand, you're like, well, this is clearly a case of classical European colonialism in Africa left over.

But then you also learn that this has been part of Spain since what the 1500s or the 1400s.

And so it's, I mean, they were living there for 500 years.

It's like, you know what I mean?

I don't, I'll let the Spanish and the Moroccans and them sort that out.

I don't even want to intervene on that question.

Frankly, I'm stumped.

It's like, well, it looks like it's a form of colonialism for sure.

But on the other hand, Morocco is actually also colonizing Western Sahara and the Sahrawi people who I support, actually.

So, who knows? Something interesting, the thing I'm talking about with Islam, by the way, it's happening in Spain as well.

Spain is undergoing this energetic revival, and there's a lot of energy in Spain right now.

Spain is learning that it's not, doesn't want to just be part of Europe.

It hasn't really fully reconciled with the spanish civil war

spain looks like it's on an interesting trajectory and as one of those peace-loving people

who loves peace.

Why can't we be friends? Why can't we be friends?

I want to see a future where Spain and Morocco and the Western Sahara all come together.

And no religion or culture dominates one or another, but you have a beautiful fusion, right?

No one's being subjugated or humiliated or dominated, but a fusion.

Is it not possible?

I think it is.

So that's my speculation.

I don't want to intervene too much on these matters that I have no. But that Israel clearly understands that the European and the Western, right,

Syke has a profound fear of Islam, this idea of hordes of Muslims just coming in and taking over that provokes a lot of fear, a lot of fear, right? And I am not just going to say that's racism. I'm going to say that's just a lack of contact. It's a lack of

understanding. But the problem is when you don't understand something and it's just coming at you,

it's like you don't even have time to reflect on it or think about it. That's why in principle I'm

against mass immigration. because I do think people

should interact and have a dialogue and come to understand each other. But when it's happening so

suddenly, and there's not even enough time or space for the interaction to actually be organic,

it causes chaos. it causes conflict, right? But we can't do anything about it. It's not within our control.

There's a huge thing going on with Islam in America.

Chinese people have Chinatown.

Indians have India town.

Jews have Tunnelville.

Sorry to Jews for making fun of you.

All sorts of different ethnic and religious enclaves exist in america

which are pretty uniform culturally and represent migrant and immigrant populations but for some reason

deerborn michigan just scares the shit out of people. There's a hook

there that's just like, this is fucking an invasion. This is doesn't belong in America. This is

terrifying. These people are aggressive terrorists. There's no other group for whom this fear applies there's all sorts of

new immigrants that come to america look at for example from vietnam they have these places

that are mainly just vietnam and it's like nobody cares but like

Muslims and Arabs there's something there now why is that that's the question we

should think about that's why I'm so interested in Islam and I've taken this

Islamic turn some people think I'm trying to insult Americans and I'm trying to just troll them or I'm just trying to, I don't know, be insensitive.

But the truth is I think that there could be

productive, a productive outcome

from thinking about

Islam in

the American context. I think it could

be very interesting, very fruitful.

Creation of

an American Islamic mythos.

I love this idea that Yellowstone is the Emerald Mountain, for example, where all the

Jin come from.

Just like things like that, I think are very interesting.

There is a Chinese way in which we dwell within the cosmos, even in America. China is the land of Tian, of heaven. So we're Chinese.

We do live in one world where part of us is Chinese, part of us is Russian, part of us is African, part of us is also Islam.

And we need to think about how we can come to terms with and understand our experiences in our reality through the lens of Islam partially at least just like we would do so from the lens of

the Chinese the Taoism and Buddhism and so on, Confucianism.

So that is my view on the matter, frankly.

Sayap, thank you. Appreciate it.

So my take you. Appreciate it. So my take on it is basically that.

And by the way, Yellowstone, what's up?

And if you think about it, it's quite...

What a great name, by the way.

You think about it and it's quite beautiful in a way, because I am over the conflict between America and Islam.

I'm focused now on the conflict within Islam.

Like, isn't it beautiful?

You guys are my primarily Christian hugely redneck audience

you're my tartarians

and what you're being introduced to is a very revolutionary, repressed type of Islam, primarily Shia, primarily occulted throughout most of history, extremely heterodox and considered heretical by the Muslim authorities and establishments of the world.

And this is the Islam I introduced to you.

And isn't it beautiful how there's this relationship of instant recognition between that we can have?

Kimmer, what's up?

And the various repressed

Christian traditions

the shakers all these Protestant

traditions it's like Thomas

Munser and

Ismail or Thomas

Munser and Junaid

it's like they can just see each other and understand it's one struggle

it's always been one struggle around the world for the same thing and that's how i think america

can transcend this fear of islam the way america should the fear of Islam is to take up the moral authority of our own mystical religious traditions. The shakers, there's something very deep and powerful. That's not about ethnicity. It's not about religious tribalism. It transcends

that fundamentally, and it is truly universal. And it originates from Quakers and Shakers and all

these different groups, Amish, all these different groups that exist in America, even Mormons,

it's like they have their own transcendental relationship to the sublime that is fully compatible with an understanding with Islam that says we have maybe differences. We're coming from different places in the world, but there's no fear anymore. We don't, why we, when you assume the reins of moral leadership and moral authority, then the Muslims of this country

will be forced to follow you, you know? You won't be insecure anymore about another group

coming and invading you because you're focusing on the invasion that's happening within

because all of our corruption within that's happening within.

Because all of our corruption within our civilization is within ultimately, right?

So I don't want, I didn't want to talk about religion, actually.

It wasn't my intention to make this stream about religion at all.

But it's worth mentioning because I have to be self-aware, to at some extent, at least, whatever this progressive swing that's happening, it's very Muslim-coded for some reason.

It's very Islamic-coded for some reason. It's very Islamic-coded.

Hassan Piker is involved.

Abdul al-Said.

Zoran Mamdani.

It's almost like there was Judeo-Bosivism before,

and now there's an Islamo-socialism or something.

I don't know.

And myself, I'm not a coincidence either.

The difference between me and all those other people, though, is that I am mainly a troublemaker within Islam.

I'm the rogue heterodox one, the one that's cast out and ostracized and would be beheaded for my beliefs.

And so I come to you.

I'm larping, by the way, about this whole thing because I was raised in America.

I'm not even... This whole story is fake, but thematically, I like the idea

of it, you know? I like the narrative.

I like the structure of that narrative.

I like the logic that is underlying it, basically. So, yeah, in any case, um,

we have to be aware of that to some extent and uh think about it at least a little bit but that's not what I wanted to talk to you about.

I wanted to talk to you about

something that is not popular, but is the truth. Something that is less exciting than

Maga-Communism. But I want you to understand the logic behind Maga-Communism, and this is part of

why I made the post that I did today

and most people don't understand this so I'm going to basically explain it to you

I hate when people you know what fucking word I hate? I told you so.

I fucking hate how useless that is.

I hate...

Every time I reference to these geese people in a positive way, you guys all look at me puzzled.

I see what you're staring at at me puzzled. I see what

you're staring at me in the chat. I know

what's on your face. I see the look

on your face. And you

stare at me like I'm fucking crazy

and I've lost it.

Should we be shit libs? I need you

to understand something. You need to be so ruthlessly

fucking pragmatic that you've transcended samsara. Do you understand that I dwell in a state of year

zero at every infinitesimal second of my life? Do you think there's an ideological conflict within me?

I live in year zero.

I meditate in year zero.

That's where I'm fucking at.

Okay.

Congratulations, though.

What?

Where's the meat and potatoes?

Well, geese people, one of them is kind of smart.

I just read something that they wrote.

And they have a term that I like because they replied to my post because I called them out saying they're right deviationists.

Because I said, I am sick of the I Told You So mentality of the marginal left.

You know who was right for 10 years?

Jason Unruh.

During the Bernie campaign and other things, you know what people like Jason Unruh and Finn Bowl would say, they would say, this is some reformist Sock them nonsense

and it's going to lead to betrayal and more imperialism and were they wrong

no they weren't wrong they were proven right every time it's almost like they're no stradamus they were proven right every time. It's almost like they're Nostradamus. They were proven

right every time. In fact, there's a Maoist from 1971, who's about 85 years old now. And since that time,

he has been proven right every single year.

He's right.

He's no Stradamus.

Nothing's ever going to happen.

This is all just a bunch of baloney.

This is not going to lead to socialism or communism or revolution.

This is all an illusion.

It's all a con.

It's all a scam.

It's all a trick.

Well, that guy's on life support now.

And it's beeping and it's beeping. and he's going to die having been right

his whole fucking life

but tell me one thing

what impacted that guy make on history

so Jason Unru was right

in 2015 okay

did he get any credit for it no that just shows how immoral

and in just the world is okay then go protest and let yourself on fire see if anyone gives a

fuck what's the solution give me the meat and fucking potatoes do you understand what i'm trying to

fucking say you don't get any

fucking brownie points for being right. You don't get any credit for saying I told you so.

You get credit for changing reality. That's the only thing you get credit for. For changing and

affecting reality and fucking being there somehow.

Nobody gives a fuck if you have the foresight to understand that Mamdani or Bernie Sanders is not

going to be the second coming of Lenin. Nobody gives a fuck about that. What matters is what you prove in practice.

Nobody gives a shit how theoretically correct you are.

You know?

It frustrates me that people don't understand that, by the way.

It profoundly frustrates me that people don't understand. Nobody by the way. It profoundly frustrates me that people don't understand.

Nobody gives a fuck if you're right.

We were right about the DSA.

When this whole thing, yes, what's going to happen is we're going to say we were right about this whole thing.

Are we going to get any credit for it, though? No. If we're not there,

we're not going to get any fucking credit. You want to know what you do get credit for when you

target the contradictions, when you mold yourself in the light, the dark light of the contradictions.

When you say, okay, there is a conflict within the Democratic Party. Let's articulate this narrative. Let's articulate this contradiction

in a clear way to the masses and be there every step of the way with them. We don't have to be in the Democratic

Party. We obviously don't have to be in the DSA, but we should be in the discourse. And people don't

understand that distinction.

We don't have to be in their institutions and surrender our independent Communist Party.

But our discourse should be there.

Every step of the fucking way we should be there.

We should discursively, in some sense, take a side. We should discursively in some sense take a side. We should discursively

point out

that

within the Democratic

party there's some

concentrated effort and attempt

to push... I'm seeing crazy shit.

I mean, our movement is lagging behind.

We're becoming marginal.

We're becoming fucking marginal.

I saw Bill fucking mayor pull up the Mug

Donald Parkinson's

literal creation

he got kicked

out of it or something now

you know that's how it works on

that's what happens when you're not

when you're not iron

fisted by the way you'll create some shit and then you get pushed out of it because you're

weak every Donald Parkinson is the creative genius behind MUG he's the guy who fucking

created all that shit.

And he just got pushed out on marginalized because he wasn't strong enough, right?

But Bill Mayer covered them. Bill Mayer went on camera, looked in camera.

How many of you fucking predicted this? How many of you were right about this? Bill Mayher looked in camera. How many of you fucking predicted this?

How many of you were right about this?

Bill Mayer went on camera and said,

I'm going to potentially vote for J.D. Vance.

If these people take over the Democratic Party, I'm out.

You know how many fucking Democrats are saying that now?

People that youth would think are the bluest, the vote blue no matter who people.

The most dyed-in-the-wall Democrat types, who for years shit lib Democrat

like the most fanatical

Democrat types are all going

the Drew Pavlu way and saying

this is not my party anymore

I'm leaving I'm going to go vote for the

Republicans now

that's where things are going that's the atmosphere for the Republicans now.

That's where things are going.

That's the atmosphere.

None of us are even in it.

We're not even tapped in.

We're fucking on the sidelines watching.

That's my fucking problem.

Why are we not at the avant-garde of this whole fucking thing we should be at the avant-garde discursively informationally we should be at the

avant-garde of everything it's not enough to just say the democrats are bad. Yes, we know they're bad. Isn't everything I'm

saying the logic of Maga-communism? You know, it's so funny, there's not a lot of people

intelligent enough to understand this. During Maga-communism, the whole point of maga communism and it was so so

simple so many people were saying well trump is bad trump is bad maga is going to be uh this is not going to lead you think maga's going to lead This is not going to lead

You think Maga is going to lead to communism

You know how many people would look at me and say

You think this is going to lead to communism

Maga's going to bring us communism

You think Trump is a good anti-imperialist

Who's going to end all the wars

And you just got to hit him with that Lenin anti-imperialist is going to end all the wars.

And you just got to hit him with that Leninist stare.

You just got to hit him with that Leninist stare.

You just got to hit these people with the Leninist stare and just be like, you so don't get it.

You really don't fucking get it.

The reason why I semi-smpathized with the geese people is because although they don't get it either, their logic is not far from getting it.

Like their logic is kind of in the direction of,

okay, you're kind of starting to understand.

Just a little bit, right?

Just in terms of their logic,

not the conclusions they reach.

And it's like, that's the point.

Nobody fucking thinks that any of these avenues or vectors of radicalization,

if they are left to the leadership of the people who monopolize them are going to amount to anything

that is

you know

concordant with the goals of Marxists or communists

but you can't just be, you can't just assist yourself from objective contradictions and make

the only contradiction between your correct consciousness and the false consciousness of everyone

else. In other words, you can't just say, I'm right, I'm in the

no, and everyone else is wrong because they're stupid. That's not a contradiction. That's a subjective

contradiction. That's not an objective contradiction. For it to be an objective contradiction

means it's affecting

the masses directly in some way.

Not indirectly, directly.

This is an objective vector of polarization

among the masses themselves.

And that's why we went with the MAGA communism thing, because MAGA was an objective contradiction that was going on within the Republican Party.

And at the time, that was the only force within U.S. politics, which was channeling any anti-system or dissident energies at all.

So it's not crazy for me to say that when that energy that we saw in MAGA, we're starting to see it in the Democratic Party itself now.

That's the truth.

We are.

I don't know what to fucking tell you.

I have a lot of wise guys in my community who wag their fingers.

They go, haze.

You know, this is all soros right okay and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and and adelson but you you you don't understand that even if there's all this dirt and pollution, whether that's ideologically or whether that's institutionally,

there is, this has become a receptacle of objective contradictions. And we have to mold our politics and our language and our discourse and our interaction with what's going on in the country in the language of the contradictions.

See, I don't believe in tailing Republicans or tailing Democrats.

I don't believe in Republican entreeism. And I don't believe in tailing republicans or tailing democrats i don't believe in republican entryism and i don't believe in democratic party entreatism but you want to know what i do fucking believe in contradiction

entryism like the contradiction is our object let Let's respond to the contradiction. Let's articulate

ourselves in the light of the contradiction with no terms and conditions. You have to

isolate concretely the correctness of your position, not just abstractly. That's Leninism 101. I am sick of

marginalization. And it's what the geese people call marginalism. And you know what? They're right.

Jason Unruh. That's marginalist Larp. Caleb Moppin, marginalist Larp.

All of that shit is marginalist Larp.

You're on the fucking margins.

You're sitting on the fucking sidelines, crossing your arms, content with your own farts about how correct you are theoretically.

Okay, you're correct abstractly, but are you correct concretely?

That's the Lennonist question.

Are you correct concretely?

Have you actually fucking put yourself there and affected reality based on your correctness

in any kind of way?

No, you're crossing your fucking arms.

Content with the fact that you have been correct all along, abstractly.

How correct can you be if it's an abstract correctness?

Isn't part of being correct, being correct practically, and being correct concretely?

Why should we not occupy a space of calling out the hypocrisy of Bill Maher?

And say, Bill Maher, you used to say vote blue no matter who, but now you're changing

your tune because

there's these candidates with

ideas you disagree with?

Why don't we say that shit?

It's not like we give a fuck about the Democratic

Party or that will ever vote for any

Democrat ever.

But just like we would tap into the ring when it came to MAGA, why don't we do the same

shit here?

Like, why don't we involve ourselves in these contradictions?

We should make sense of them the most because we actually know what the fuck is going on do we not

if we're so in the know and if we're so correct then aren't we the people who actually know

what the fuck is going on in the first place to be able to make the judgment that hey you know

although we know the causes of why this is,

simultaneously we know what kind of war this is.

According to Heraclitus, you want to talk about Dark Malie,

Heraclitus says war is the father of all things. Everything is war.

You need to understand the wars that are going on, the conflicts that are going on. We are at our best when we understand those.

When you take a position,

when it's the DSA versus Bill

Mayher or John Federman,

and you're fucking on the sidelines, you know where

you're sitting on the cuck chair?

Just like

back then, when it was Mitch McConnell

versus MAGA

and you just

I hope pity both sides can't lose

you're sitting on the cuck chair

when you're looking at this shit

going on in the Democratic Party and you're just

sitting on the chair you're sitting on a cuck chair

you're missing out opportunities you're just sitting on the chair, you're sitting on a cuck chair. You're missing out opportunities. You're missing out vectors of radicalization that will ultimately conclude in people joining our party and seeing the light to the correctness of our position. But we need to actualize our position concretely, and we need to find the proper concrete

context by which our position is necessary in the first place. And none of us like to see the fact

that DSA has maintained its relevancy still in 2026. Why? Because many of you and many of us were in the DSA 10 years ago, or five years ago, or two years ago, and we consider it a past stage in our own development, and we're right about that.

So none of us are happy to see that the DSA has more longevity than we thought it would, based on our own personal subjective development.

But the facts are as they are.

The DSA is relevant.

Should we join the DSA?

Absolutely fucking not.

But can we afford to just

from the margins

pretend that something isn't going on in this country?

No, we can't.

We have to actually appreciate what's going on for what it is.

And people might ask, well, what's your objective guidance on this matter?

Well, my objective guidance is very simple.

Insert yourselves in these conflicts

and take the right side you will be surprised imagine if if you were a voice for dsa people

or voters within the democratic party who are anti-Israel and you inserted yourself in the conflict between the explicitly pro-Zionist wing and the pro-Palestine wing and you were like a fighter and a warrior. Everyone loves

a warrior. You know in battle

when a man runs up with a sword

and just starts fucking

chopping everyone's heads off

and shit, nobody gives

a fuck where that guy came from. People will

fucking appreciate that guy and so acp should

what we should do is we should insert ourselves in this conflict discursively culturally informationally

in a way that makes people come around to and appreciate our voice, that we're speaking for them.

We understand you.

We're speaking for you.

It's like that's how you need to be.

You need to be able to be their voice for the contradiction that they're in.

Not the contradiction you want them to be in, but the contradiction that they're actually in.

You know?

Now it would be nice to just say, oh, I'm just going to watch this play out.

We can't afford to do that.

We're wasting energy if we do that.

We have to tap in.

Just like we're willing to tap in with MAGA, we have to tap in with this.

And... and I really

think this stream is going to be very important

because I see hurdles and obstacles

to people understanding this

and it has a lot to do with consciousness.

Because there's something very awkward about everything that's going on.

That makes this different from Maga-Communism.

Very different from Maga-Communism.

There's something awkward happening.

There's an elephant in the room that I'm not addressing, so to speak.

And you guys need to fucking hear it.

And the elephant in the room

to introduce you to it

is the problem of consciousness.

There's a spectrum.

At one point point you were politically apathetic or you were a liberal or you were a republican or you were a libertarian or you were something else or you were normie. You had some journey that led you here to the infrared Kisselbosch.

Something along your development in your journey led you here to the American Communist Party, to this movement, to infrared, to Midwestern Marx, whatever you want to call it.

But that was a journey of development.

When you interpret that as a journey of consciousness, then you become biased in terms of how you see reality.

Because the DSA shitlib phase is behind you.

You had to overcome that.

You had liberal biases.

You had politically correct biases, genuine biases that you had to confront,

that you had to overcome, and that you had to transcend and move beyond, to arrive at where you are now.

But for many of you, you haven't made peace with your past.

You're still fighting and repressing the liberal inside of you.

You're still fighting your own past.

You're still searching for a way to justify why you left where you were before,

right? And part of how you do that is by bracketing off, you know, lesser stages of development, whether it's DSA or anything else, and being like,

they're dead and we're on the rise.

No, what's happening is that you have made it out, but not everyone is at the same level of development as you and what makes this

whole thing awkward in terms of the elephant of the room elephant in the room is there's no precedent for this within marxism now typically if there was a direct line between you know just republicans or Democrat normies

and being Marxists and communists

this would be profoundly easy

because we have a word for that in Marxism

correct consciousness

revolutionary consciousness

class consciousness versus false consciousness. You could just say, in my

past, I was in a state of false consciousness. But that's not quite true. For most of you here,

your past was defined by consciousness, hyper-consciousness. They even had a word for it. It was called woke.

You were conscious. You were too conscious. And what you were taught by infrared and by ACP or Midwest or whatever you came

from, what we taught you how

to do is to go beyond

and transcend your consciousness.

To appreciate the unconscious,

to appreciate the implicit,

to appreciate the thing

that cannot be consciousness.

So we are post-woke in a way, right?

And like, this is what you learned from us.

And Marxism doesn't have a precedent for that.

Marxism doesn't have a precedent for a stage of subjectivity

that transcends consciousness. Marxism has always understood that the development is from lack of

consciousness to consciousness. But the awkward thing for us is that we are post-consciousness.

We are post-woke.

Whatever state, Harold, what's up?

Whatever psychological state, ideological state, whatever you want to call it subjective state

we have achieved here it's an altered state of consciousness it's some some kind of insight

that is just not about just being conscious, but it's an understanding that primarily is unconscious, it's implicit.

There's a profound mystical element. There's a profound, I mean, this is dark Mali. This is dark Marxism. This is what we mean by Infrawoke, by the way.

The ability to comprehend something like the golden Stalinist center,

where you can actually genuinely understand how, you know,

you need to be cognizant of the dialectical element you need to be cognizant about how something can be revolutionary in in terms of consciousness but be reactionary in terms of its practical content that there's this disjunction between these two things

and that is like a state of enlightenment or it's like it sucks that nick land stole the term dark enlightenment because that's what this really is it's a dark enlightenment

it's a black enlightenment you know it comes from sufism i guess but this is a black

enlightenment your post consciousness and another awkward thing about the consciousness paradigm within Marxism is that in the information age, this is the thing that's always had me fucked up, if you ask me, like this is one of the unresolved quandaries of infrared theory, which I have solved now, I think, but in the past, no.

You know, we somehow, we have this strict distinction.

Why did I go so hard against leftists in the past?

And this is, I hope you follow through everything I'm saying.

Why did I hate leftists so much?

Because we had in classical Marxism an understanding,

you can forgive the non-conscious masses who are like in false consciousness.

You have to forgive them and be patient with them. But for those who are educated and conscious

and know better, they're unforgivable when they make the wrong choices and wrong decisions.

Like, okay, you can be patient with normies who are just not educated enough, but for when someone

becomes conscious and familiar with this ideology and this rupture of ideology, then suddenly they become not an object, but a subject,

a subject who has to be evaluated in terms of their decisions, their ideological decisions,

the brands they chose to follow, the positions they chose to take.

You go from a childlike state to someone who has moral agency for the first time.

And so it's like I've always considered leftist people who have moral agency

but are

choosing immorality

usually in Marxism

that's not how you see the masses

the way you see the masses

is not a bunch of moral agents becoming

immoral but people primarily defined, almost passively, by the way, by their material conditions.

Well, of course, in the absence of socialist consciousness, in the absence of enlightenment, people are primarily going to be defined by their material conditions.

You have to be patient and forgive the masses for that fact, right?

And so, but when it comes to people who have become enlightened, who do wake up and become woke to Marxist consciousness,

that's a rupture. Everyone understands it's a rupture. Whenever you started becoming a

Marxist, I'm pretty sure for most of you, it was a rupture. That was a metabolic

break with your past form of consciousness. Suddenly, you enter into the realm of moral agency for the

first time. And so I saw other Marxists and leftists the same way.

But now I'm wise enough to understand something I didn't before, because there's no precedent

within Marxism for this.

That's not the highest stage of development. Theoretical consciousness

and enlightenment consciousness, that is not the highest stage. There's a stage higher than that.

And from the perspective of this higher stage,

which is almost like a mystical enlightenment, from the perspective of the infrared vision, if you will,

we see conscious Marxist activists and leftists, we have to see them as just as passive as Normie masses.

And this problem has become evident, primarily in the information age for a very simple reason.

In the information age for the first time ever... the development of consciousness has become mass induced and predictable it is... It is mechanically induced in a way.

It's like you are not an active subject

when you go on a radicalization pipeline

through discord and through memes

to adopt a politically extreme ideology or to adopt communism or Marxism, that no longer interpolates you as an active moral agent or moral subject. You are a statistic who is the passive receptacle of material conditions, because information has become a material force.

So consciousness is no longer the decisive break that makes you a moral agent anymore.

You understand what I mean?

Like, you have to treat, in the way that Marxists, the stereotypical

DSA socialist would be like, okay, how do you explain all these bad, rotten people who are poor?

They'll be like, well, it's just because they're material conditions, create this environment.

But then in the information age there's another awkward

problem

we have to start treating

political consciousness

itself even in its most advanced form, as a passive, passively induced consequence of information environments, echo chambers, algorithms, socialization dynamics that are happening because of online dynamics.

Gladio, what's up?

And that's the difference.

That was not the case in Lenin's time.

In Lenin's time, when you started picking up the books and reading Marx

and initiating yourself into Marxist communities, you made a choice. You forsook. You had to forsake your prior class background because usually you were a class traitor, you had to completely devote your life to a new cause. Like you were actually a moral agent. That's why it's really interesting. Why is it that Bolsheviks and Marxists in the past used to be so selfless.

They used to be so like, I'm fully just going to devote myself to this.

I'm going to abandon my prior life, abandon my class interest, my immediate material interest for this cause.

But then today, if you go into a DSA meeting, or if you go into a discord full of Marxists, and you ask them, hey, why are you a Marxist?

They're like, well, I just want health care.

Or some of them will say, I want my life to improve.

I want my material conditions to improve.

I want better things for me.

I want to unionize interpretive dance instructors so that we have a better life.

I want to make this all about my particular conditions, my particular material conditions, because I'm the revolutionary subject. I'm the working class.

I work for an HR department and get a salary of $80,000 a year, and I live in Manhattan. I'm the working class, as you can see, right? And that was not the case before in the Marxist or socialist tradition.

Most of the time, a lot of these people were class traders, and if they weren't class traders, if you ask them, hey, why are you a Marxist?

Why are you a socialist? They would say something along the lines of, it's my duty to history.

It's a necessity.

We have to do this for humanity.

We have to do this for the supremacy of the proletariat.

I sacrifice and lay down my life for this cause.

And that's not the case anymore.

There's a self-serving element that when it comes to mass socialist movements online or Marxist communities on the Internet, where it's primarily self-serving, and it's based on the immediate desires right so why is that well

because being conscious theoretically or politically no longer interpolates you as an active

moral subject anymore it is a predictable outcome as a

consequence of two things information civilization we are always now informed we're all woke now we are

all woke now like do you know what the awakening part of woke was?

Do you know why George Floyd happened in 2020 right after the lockdowns?

Because when we were all on lockdown, that was the way everyone became forced to be part of information civilization.

When your only way of reaching the outer world was through information, and that was your only connection to society, you officially had to be woke. You had to be awake. You had to define your reality in terms of discourse, discursively mediated meaning. Okay. And that is what that, that's how you, you were sleeping before, but now you're awakened.

You're like, I've awakened to the Twitter hive mind of hashtags.

It's like you, you had to because during lockdown, when your only way of interacting with the wider world was through online,

that was how everyone became woke.

And this was not a left or right thing because as Ariaster depicted in Eddington,

this was also the right on the right and for leftists as well.

It was the same woke thing that took over everyone, the woke mind virus.

The woke mind virus is just information civilization.

And after COVID and after the lockdowns, there's no type of

conscience. You can't go pre-woke. It's not possible. You can't return to the whatever type of

dormancy was before that. So the very term woke proves the superfluousness of consciousness.

Consciousness is no longer what defines moral agency anymore. But you need to understand that was not the case 100 years ago.

100 years ago. 100 years ago, being awake was the privilege of only a few people who dedicated their entire

lives to this mission.

But it's become democratized now, and that's what woke means.

Woke basically means everyone is now conscious.

Now, if you read Boris Grois's book, the Communist Postcript, he talks about how language is the currency of communism.

That's the extent of the introduction I'm going to give it to you right well in the in the age of a transition between the capitalist and socialist mode of

production like the one we're living in now it makes sense that that everyone went woke, whether they're right-wing or left-wing or something, because language and discourse is becoming the currency of our civilization as well, as we're transitioning from one mode of production into the other. And if you go to communist states historically or even China today or even post-communist states like Russia today, you will find that people are just profoundly aware of the world around them in ways that Americans usually were not, right?

And so we're dealing with a really awkward situation where we're not on this equal playing field with the rest of the Marxists and

socialists. It's not like Lenin versus Kotzky anymore. Lenin versus Kotzky versus

Bernstein versus other people in that movement. Those were people on the same dimension of moral agency arguing over what is the good, what is the bad, what's the right, what's the wrong. We don't have this common discourse anymore. We are quite literally

above

the rest of

the left

in terms of

our stage

of development

because they're

stuck in

consciousness

and we've

achieved something

post woke.

Once if

you're still

fucking here

holy shit.

Don't know if my fucking stream just crashed.

Holy shit.

Okay.

Just making sure the stream didn't crash.

You could stop.

Okay.

So, uh... Just making sure the stream didn't crash. You could stop. Okay.

So, uh, now I'm not saying that's cause for arrogance or that we have to tap out of the discourse at this point because we can't.

But don't you guys understand that when we argue with leftists online, there is no chance

they're going to be won over to us.

What's actually happening is that we're asserting the hegemony and the dominance of our

discourse to make it easier for them to transition when they make that choice.

But the transition from being woke to post-woke or being woke to infra-woke is just as much of a metabolic break

as the transition

from being unwoke

to being woke.

Like, remember when you were not a Marxist

and you learned about Marxism for the first time

and how crazy that, like, how much of a decisive break that transition was. The transition from being a cookie-cutter Marxist or leftist to being infrared is just as much a metabolic break.

That is a real break of moral decisiveness.

That's a real choice.

That's like the choice when Lenin made to be a Marxist.

For the first time, you're a moral agent who's morally responsible.

You're not just someone

who's induced passively

by algorithms

or groomed into something.

You're actually making a fucking choice

for the first time ever.

Because why?

Because when you transcend consciousness itself you comprehend that the normative dimension is not preempted by your conscious choices it's also preempted by your practical existence like how you are

aligned with the cosmos how you are aligned with the microcosmos that we call society how you treat

your parents your family the people around you what kind of character you have

what kind of human being are you are how much you actually have consideration for your fellow

man how much you are sensitive to the sacred feelings of the masses,

to the things that typically would only be in religion, right?

How much of a sensitivity do you have to that?

How much of that do you understand the meaning of it?

The unspoken, the hidden, the thing that's not just

virtue signaling, that can't be just economized as virtue signaling, infrared consciousness

opens you up to an entire world that you never used to see before, right? Because it's not just consciousness

anymore. It's more like a dialectic of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, need in Marxism for people to acquire the correct consciousness.

But there's what we learn from the experience of history, if you ask me, is that when we measure things by virtue of consciousness alone, you get opportunists like Khrushchev and Gorbachev and others.

You get the great purges that are necessary. You get the need for the cultural revolution in China, because consciousness is not enough.

Because even if everyone becomes woke and conscious, bad people can still disguise

themselves in the language of consciousness. And how do we make moral qualitative distinctions

between the character

of different people based on that.

We can't. So there's a step

above consciousness that

we have to attain, which

I think we learn from the Chinese cultural

revolution. I think

Xi Jinping is someone who's attained the level above consciousness. Everyone needs to be very intensely following what I'm saying here. After the cultural revolution, when Xi Jinping was sent down to the countryside and he learned from the

sacred wisdom of the people that was infrowoke that was post-woke like if the red guards woke, when they were sent down to the countryside to learn the everyday sacred life of the masses, that was the stage of the post woke. That was the way you could finally comprehend the concrete. Not just this ideological,

abstract,

obsessive consciousness anymore,

but something that transcends consciousness.

Some kind of embedded,

I don't know,

we don't even really have the word for it some kind of sage-like sagacious insight into the sacred

into the materially real that's that's unspoken and jishin ping because he had that experience he's like a sage

and he's that that's why jishin ping is jizhen ping you know but that's above consciousness do you understand that's above consciousness. Do you understand? That's above consciousness. It's not on... There's nothing Xi Jinping is conscious of that makes him a sage. Because it's not just about what you're conscious of and what you're not conscious of.

It's about to what extent have you resigned yourself to the absolute?

To what extent do you actually decisively resign yourself to the real and give way to the real and accept reality for what it is. To what extent are you at peace with what reality actually is? To what extent have you discovered through your sixth sense the concrete content of what before was only in your consciousness?

Before you had consciousness, which meant you virtue signaled, you communicated how conscious you were. But what was the thing that you were talking about or thinking about before? What is that object when you acquire a relationship to that object that is based on an aesthetic

sensibility that I can sense and feel this thing and I know what it is concretely because

it now defines how I actually in a somber way relate to the world around me

and the people around me, not as a colonizer or a conquistador imposing my consciousness on others,

but by discovering the wisdom of how reality is already

reconciled in such a way that renders my consciousness superfluous. In other words, what the Sufis

talked about as the annihilation of the self into God,

whatever you treasure and you cling onto that you discover by way of consciousness,

the true and consistent materialism says that at that moment you've reached enlightenment, you then have to give way.

Because the thing that you're thinking about in your consciousness and that you're talking about with your words, with your mouth, is something you now have insight into as already materially real. For, it's very simple, for how could you have achieved this level of consciousness were it not for the fact that it is already

materially real it is already materially there and real and you had to go through consciousness in order to appreciate that fact.

So some people might misunderstand this and say, okay, Haas.

So what you're basically saying is that consciousness is unnecessary, that I can just dwell in immediate existence,

and I don't need consciousness because it's already here. And I say, no, you will not appreciate

the hereness of the thing unless you actually go through the stage of consciousness such that you can acquire an understanding of what was always under your nose the entire time, which you took for granted before.

So this is a very simple structure of the Garden of Eden.

Adam and Eve did not.

They took that garden for granted.

Only when they lost it.

Could they finally

appreciate paradise.

And this

tri-part trinitarian

structure is the same thing here.

When you begin in

immediate

everyday

lack of consciousness, Normie, when you're a normie.

So this is the dialectic of normie is normie and radicalization, right?

When you're a normie, you don't appreciate what's in front of you you don't appreciate the concrete

whole and totality of existence what was the concrete whole according to marx

communism communism is the concrete thing the concrete thing is a totalized

unity of the division of labor

where

so man depends

on others so others depend upon

him it's a relationship of reciprocal

existence based on labor

and that's the totality of labor, even in feudalism, even in capitalism, even in ancient

slave society, in some sense, in a very strict, strictly defined sense, Marxism says

there is an objective communism. It's just that the awareness or

appreciation of communism is not institutionalized or acknowledged, but it's still there objectively.

That's why he calls it the riddle of history solved. Okay. So, when you're in the

Edenic state of Adam and Eve, when you're on Normie, you don't appreciate reality. Yes, it's there in front of you,

but you're unable to appreciate it. You're unable to have gratitude toward it, and therefore

you are unable to devote your existence toward it and align your actions with it but when you enter

the stage of consciousness you think that you're acquiring something like it's a plus but in reality

it's a negative when we we became woke during George Floyd, we didn't gain anything.

We lost something, namely our ability to take our reality for granted.

We turned our reality into something that had to be argued about or deducted or concluded through

discourse and through consciousness. When we became woke, you could no longer just watch a movie

from 1981 and enjoy it as a naive normie anymore. Suddenly, you're seeing,

oh, this is the racial archetype, this is the sexist archetype, the patriarchical, racist, colonial

structure in this movie. Like, you lost the ability to just be living in the moment and live in reality.

And you looked at everything through a filter once you acquire consciousness.

In some sense, this was a farcical repetition of the chinese cultural revolution

because during the cultural revolution for many of the student redguards

when you gained the consciousness you lost something before maybe you lived an ordinary life and you just took everything for granted,

once you acquired consciousness, you lost the ability to be normal. Everything had to be filtered

through the lens of the correct ideology

everything did right

you lost the ability to just be able

to what do they say

enjoy things do you understand

so that's actually a loss

you lose something that's actually a loss.

You lose something.

That's the stage of the negation.

So infrared and the post woke, that is the negation of the negation.

That's the third term of the dialectic. That's the sublation. Now, if you want me to translate this in religious terms and give you my humble opinion on the matter, I think that

Judaism is one where because we're the chosen people we have a direct communion with god we're chosen okay

like we seamlessly are integrated with god and even if you're bad you're still part of this covenant

and that's judaism okay christianity is the rupture christianity is the

negation the crucifixion happens and it's negation now we have to be awakened to the the gospel okay

the gospel of christ so stage two is all about the gospel, okay, the gospel of Christ. So stage two is all about the gospel. Now, this is my perspective,

which I have the right to share, and I'm full disclosure with you, because I'm not playing Tequila

games with you, okay? I think Islam is the third term, because Islam

etymologically means

wholeness, okay? It's like a restoration

of wholeness.

Islam is post

gospel. Islam says,

yes, the Holy Spirit,

but what is the Holy Spirit? How do we form a community in relation

to the Holy Spirit? What does that look like decisively? Right? So that's a kind of analogy. Maybe

it's helpful to you. Maybe it's not. And maybe you can find a way to

subvert this analogy and have a different interpretation of it, which I'm totally open to. I've never

closed myself off to other interpretations. But whatever you

fill the third term with, there is

a third term. Because during

the era of the gospel,

you also had the rise of Gnosticism,

which was a competing trend

that had to be

snuffed out and eradicated.

Gnosticism is woke. It's the same thing. It's like it's, it's, it's this profound

disjuncture with the everydayness of reality. It's logos. In Christianity,

what do they say about Christ? Christ is the Logos. He is the Logos. But Logos, as Heraclitus talks about, is the dreamer who wakes up and forgets about the dream they just had. That's Logos. That's the disjuncture. That's the

metabolic rift between the is and the ought, right? That's the metabolic rift that creates the possibility of moral agency that's why christianity

is the metabolic rift out of which emerges the moral for the first time right um what happened to the Marxism is Islam essay you may not believe it but I'm working on it every day I'm sitting and thinking about it and working on it it's just you know I'm getting caught up I haven't abandoned it don't worry I'm working on it. It's just, you know, I'm getting caught up. I haven't abandoned it. Don't worry. I'm working on it every day.

So, to move away from the religious analogy back to what's relevant to us as the American Communist Party and as an infrared.

Infrared is the third, okay? So that's where, that's the place we occupy regarding, you know, the woke phenomena or leftism or whatever and the thing i want you to to think

about and and marinate on and understand is that we have to unfortunately this is the most excruciatingly difficult thing but in all my years this is one of the things i had to wise up to which i did not before twenty twenty four had i not wised up to this fact our our unity with Midwestern Marx would not have happened.

And now the unity we have with Midwestern Marx is not just institutional within the ACP.

Like, it's one based on genuine comradeship, and I have to say as well, genuine friendship.

Like, Eddie and Carlos are actually my friends.

Also, Noah as well and the friendships and the comradeship between infrared people and there's no distinction between us but had i not wisenened up to this fact

that I'm about to tell you now,

that could not have happened.

The thing that I have to tell you about

that you need to wise up to

is that

stage two, the conventional leftism, is just like stage one.

From the perspective of stage three, stage one and stage two are just as misguided.

You don't understand misguided.

Not...

Not...

You can't ascribe them so much moral agency. You can't say people stuck in stage two are necessarily evil or immoral. You should rather say they're misguided. But the awkward thing is, in order to guide them and to teach them you you can't impose some

consciousness or theory on them what you have to do is convince them to do something that's more

than just at the level of superficial consciousness and discourse, which is genuinely, cease.

In some way, it's like cease your let go. go let go of this hang up inside of you let go of this attachment within you forgive your parents forgive your family, forgive your fathers.

Move beyond this bitterness and this enmity and this negativity within you.

And genuinely be at peace with what reality is.

Acquire this new perspective that allows you to be grateful to the real,

which you never were before.

Be at peace so that you finally have something to fight for,

which you don't have right now.

You have nothing to fight for.

You are caught in a fight,

but you have nothing to fight for.

You're not a moral agent.

You're a victim.

You're a hapless victim of a contradiction induced inside of your heart, of a cognitive dissonance

ripping you inside from within.

But to be a moral agent, you have to have something to fight for.

And it's this four thing.

That for all your awakening, for all your consciousness and your wakefulness, you remain blind to, to surrender to, and to accept

this thing for which you must struggle and fight.

You have to let go of the enmity within yourself.

Let go of your bitterness.

Let go of your hatred.

Let go of this conflict inside of you, accept, and be at peace with the real.

And have a profound gratitude for that, for the real. Have a profound gratitude for it.

Be grateful that you have the opportunity to live the life that you live,

to struggle for what you need to struggle for.

Smile and laugh along the way enjoy it be human there's it's not going to get

different from this this is where you're at you know you need to overcome this turmoil and agony inside of yourself and just

accept the profound elegance and beauty.

And yes,

harmony of the cosmos.

Everything is the way it is for a reason.

It is.

All that is real for example

why should we say that the occupation of our nation is real?

Why is it real?

Where's the real power?

Why should we be intimidated by all the weapons all the force all the powers concentrated in the regime

if you know what's really real you realize they're the ones panicking they're the ones bitter they're the

ones who have this conflict the strife inside of themselves that they have not made peace with

but we have and when you make peace you make them account for their deficiencies you make

them come to terms with what they're lacking but which you have but differently they're fucking tripping, not you.

You're not fucking tripping.

They are.

You're not the fucking crazy one.

They are.

You're not the fucking aggressor with a chip on their shoulder.

They fucking are you want indignation you want moral indignation be morally indignant about that be morally indignant about the fact that

you and your fellow man and your fellow woman just want to live

normal lives, human lives of human dignity, and that for this crime, the aggressors have declared war on you.

Be indignant about that fact.

Be indignant in the same way a lion is indignant about a fucking tick.

That has jumped on it you just shake that shit off

don't fucking let it get to you

don't let it eat you away internally you're a fucking lying

why the fuck are you going to let

this small thing corrupt your soul just get rid of it and move on you, people can't move on

when they're stuck in a state of consciousness.

When I defeat my enemies, I move the fuck on.

But when someone's stuck in a state of consciousness

ever is allowed to defeat their enemy.

It's not enough.

They have to torture.

They have to take more and more and more because to torture someone means I'm not satisfied with removing this obstacle.

I want to make them suffer because I'm suffering.

But the suffering that's inside of you is the problem.

You understand?

The suffering inside of you incriminates you.

Why are you suffering inside?

Why are you still suffering inside of you whatever if you don't have the profound faith that the thing

that eats inside of you that you can be you can solve that problem you could be at peace with it.

We all wage an energy hot,

but you want to know why I'm fucking smiling and laughing 99% of the fucking time when you meet me in person?

Because I really do think when all is said and done, we got this shit.

We will prevail.

We will find a fucking way.

And no, we're not going to find a way by holding society hostage as leftists think.

They think that the only way I'm going to confront this suffering inside myself is by forcing all of society to speak in the way that I want them to speak to me, to change their pronoun, whatever, to change how they treat me or to change how society is structured, that's not going to solve the contradiction inside of you.

You don't even know what you're fighting for if that's what you're fighting for.

You're not a communist fighting to transform the world you're deflecting responsibility to confront your own suffering

and your own internal issues and holding society hostage but it's not society's problem. It's yours.

You know, even when you're victimized by this society, let's say you're an innocent man thrown in jail. Those people have more anger than

anyone. But you know what, at a certain point, they understand the truth. It's just the way it

fucking is. Nobody, it's not society's problem. It's my fucking problem.

Then a lion, someone who's achieved the third stage of development, says, why are we allowing

this to happen to that person? This is unjust. Why are we committing this injustice and this

aggression against an innocent person? Who is going to bring justice? The second person or someone who's angry and has a grudge against society?

No, you're angry and you have a grudge.

You're fighting yourself.

The only way we can overcome the evil within ourselves is to fight for others fight

on behalf of others fight to bring justice to others you alone can bring justice to yourself

but you want to know what you can fucking do

you can stand up for other people

you can stand up for people who are not you

you can stand up for yourself

but others wherever you for yourself.

But others,

wherever you can to stand up for them,

do you want to know why?

Because it's true.

It's true people do need to stand up for you.

It is true. But you can't wait for them to do that you

have to stand up for yourself unfortunately that's the truth you can't be

resentful for people not doing that.

But at the same time,

if society does you dirty,

you're victimized,

you die,

and you martyr yourself,

and you fucking go to heaven or whatever.

It's like you actually are at peace.

We are the ones that have to live with that evil.

We have to live with that.

We have to live with that wickedness and with that evil. When you're fucking gone

and it's just over, G.G. for you,

you're gone.

You're not a victim anymore. You're gone.

We have to live with it.

You have, when you, when our society is committing against injustice, against other people, you have to live with that. Not them. When, you know, if they're gone, they're gone, gone right you have to live with it and so if you have to live with it what does it mean you have to make it your duty to stand up for other people.

Even though it seems like a contradiction, I tell you on the one hand to stand up for

yourself and don't wait for anyone.

And then simultaneously, I say, you have to, after reaching

the third stage, stand up for other people.

Why is that?

Well, it's very simple.

It's actually

so profoundly simple.

Learn from Jesus who gracefully accepted his fate.

People, they don't understand the wisdom, the profound meaning of that.

They have no fucking idea what it means.

They think somehow it means you should be a pacifist and you should never fight back or defend yourself.

That's not what it means.

It means in a sense that I did my part as much as I could, but I was failed.

And I resigned.

There's nothing I can do.

I did my part.

If I scream and complain at others for not attending to me enough, it's like,

why should i why should i sacrifice my gratitude my inner peace because other people never ever betray your peace within yourself ever betray the peace within yourself but when you stand up for other

people you are doing right by something you are doing right by something more than yourself

so you're at peace with yourself and you're at peace with the world.

But to be at peace with communism,

to be at peace with the cosmos, the microcosmos that we call society,

to be at peace with the social microcosmos the umma you have to do right by it and this doing right

is not a cost it's not an extension of some eternal cognitive dissonance that you're throwing onto the world.

It's as seamless as a lion descending upon their prey.

Yes, it's furious.

Yes, it's ferocious.

But it's just what you fucking do when you have your shit together.

It's just what you fucking do when you have your shit together. It's just

what you fucking do.

Because that shit is yours

and you're a part of it.

And it's part of what you are.

Peace doesn't mean passivity.

Do you understand? Do you understand what I'm saying? Peace doesn't mean passivity do you understand do you understand what i'm saying peace doesn't mean you're passive peace means you fucking got that shit locked in and you understand your place

in everything and the place of everything in you that's why jesus accepted his fate but then he

also said i've come here with the sword why did he say that he didn't

accept his fate because he was a pacifist he accepted his fate because he was a pacifist. He accepted his fate because he

was at peace with it.

It didn't bother him

existentially inside of him.

He didn't let that demoralize and

crush him. He didn't let

that kill his spirit. Do you

understand? You don't let it get to you. You don't let that kill his spirit. Do you understand?

You don't let it get to you.

You don't let it shake your faith.

You patiently resign yourself.

Never let the way that the enemy wins is not by annihilating you physically the way the enemy wins is crushing your spirit

that's how demons win they don't win

by a demon doesn't win by coming and fucking slapping your face

and bitch slapping you

a demon wins when they fucking get to you when they get in your

fucking head and they crush your spirit they break your morale they break your spirit they

fucking make you black pill and give the fuck up. Thank you. so we're talking about a tri-part stage in the development of the American psyche or the soul or the subject you know and woke is the second stage of the negation and we're the third stage and by the way anti-woke is still in the second stage anyone who's anti-woke is in the second stage because you have to think about it don't the anti-trans people have trans derangement syndrome like they're always talking about

transgender's and shit that's still stage two that's the same thing as a transgender who's obsessed

with transgenderism it's the same derangement. But both of them want to trick us and deny that stage

three is possible. And that's the fucking problem. Stage three is possible. You can transcend consciousness

itself. And let's

go full circle in how the fuck that I

get, how the fuck did I even get here, right?

Well,

the way that I fucking got here in the first

place was

through something simple.

When we're looking at the DSA people and the progressive left,

it does piss us off and anger us.

Because we think that they're moral agents on the same plane as us.

But the truth is, they're in stage two and we're in stage three.

So if we're going to be patient with the masses in stage one,

you also need to be patient with the masses in stage two. Because

stage two is just as a passive amoral thing as stage one. Like you don't get angry at Normies

for eating hot dogs, do you? So why would't get angry at Normies for eating hot dogs, do you?

So why would you get angry at a DSA Marxist for screaming about pronouns and jibber buzzword salads?

When they're calling you a Nossbole and shit, it's like you need to understand

when they call you a Nossbole

and they call you a racist

and a sexist and all this kind of stuff,

it's like

that's just like a

normie eating a hot dog during

a genocide. It's like, well, that's just like a normie eating a hot dog during a genocide it's like well that that's just

they're not developed enough instead of like letting it get to you how can you let it get to you

that clearly there's been a jump and a leap

you've made that they're afraid of making do you understand that at least this is not a theoretical

disagreement this is not a polemical ideological. This disagreement is separated by a vast chasm

within the soul.

And that's why when people take the infrared pill,

they take the whole thing.

How often do we need part by part

to get infrared people to buy into

all of our wacky worldview thing?

Whenever someone takes the infrared pill they take the

whole fucking thing all at once because it all becomes clear to them if only like then nobody gets

persuaded by these debates that you have which you should still have to assert our discursive hegemony

and create the pressure, because this needs pressure, right?

But when people take the infra-pill, it's like this.

The whole everything makes sense at once.

Simultaneously, everything makes sense all at once, right?

And we need to think about how do we give people more of those infra pills? How do we induce people

with more of that? How do we get people to understand that better like the stage there's so many different stages of consciousness but our stage transcends consciousness itself captain what's up appreciate you man it's like you know, when I see people being infrared's

opportunist, first you made this meme about MAGA, then you're making all these other

memes, and you're just changing your positions, and I'm like,

stage two, you're on stage two. You don't understand. When you're on stage

three, you've transcended consciousness.

You know what stage? Okay, I'm going to give you another word for stage three.

Stage three are people who look at the information space as a battle space in the abstract and in general. You no longer see it as the battlefield for your own soul.

You see it as an information battle space, just like a military would see it.

The same way a military treats information space, that's what stage three consciousness treats it as.

When you're a military, you're not thinking about information space in a personal way.

You're not attaching your

morale and ideology

strictly reducing that.

I thought Maga-Communism

was your ideology.

In other words,

a lot of people think

or diluted to themselves.

You know how they say if you're a 3D perspective, you cannot see in 4D.

If you're a two-dimensional being, 3D makes no sense to you.

There's no way for you to see in 3d everything will be looking 2d to you even 3d phenomena will look 2d to you and the same thing for 4d space

if you know that analogy right it's the same thing with these stages people who saw

maga communism who are stuck in stage two consciousness they were like so this is your soul and your ideology?

And like,

it's like, no, this is bait for you and I'm fishing on a boat and you're a fucking goldfish.

Like, you can't even see the boat. You can't see the third stage because you've never achieved it

i'm here up here you my whole life and soul is not here this This is, maga-communism is not my religion,

but it looks like a religion to you,

because that's the only way you know how to interface with memes,

is creating idols.

Well, I use memes to communicate a stage three level of subjectivity that is not

reducible to the thing, like like for example

if you are an octopus

and you have a tentacle

appear up from the ocean.

Is all you are the tentacle?

No, but if I'm looking at you from a boat,

it seems that way that you're just this tentacle.

But that's because I can't see the octopus.

Same thing with Maga-Communism.

There's this big infrared globe, this orb.

There's this infra orb.

This orb, okay?

This profound stage three Sufi

enlightenment, this black enlightenment.

That's what the infrared globe

is the luminous black. It's the black

enlightenment, right?

And it's like the head of the octopus.

And it's like, maga-communism was one tentacle. And then there's another the octopus. And it's like, Maga-Communism was one tentacle.

And then there's another tentacle.

And there's all these different tentacles.

And it's like,

everyone's trying to shoot the tentacle

because they don't understand

and they can't perceive the head

because they literally are unable

to actually

like they're not even in a stage of consciousness where they're

capable of comprehending it they're stuck in a stage two level

where all they can see are the effects they can't see like the source, right?

And that's the analogy, really.

That's really the analogy.

It's like they don't understand the root source type of worldview and outlook that this is all coming from because that requires crossing a metabolic rift from pre-moral accidental consciousness to true moral agency and moral alignment with the cosmos, right?

Microcosmic moral alignment is only possible through the Sufi stage of luminous black of the annihilation of the self.

And if you can't reach that stage, you don't know what comes beyond that stage.

You can't even see beyond it.

You just see a black

void but what's beyond the stage

of luminous black does anyone know

green

the emerald mountain

yellow stone caledra

my vision for the story of infrared is a geosophical odyssey okay where the stages of the

development of enlightenment through the Sufi Illuminationist School, which infrared is really drawing from in a lot of ways, is literally reflected geographically as a long march to Yellowstone. and that's the Emerald Mountain.

To get to Yellowstone, we have to get through all of these stages, okay?

Hit Kilati, what's up? We have to reach Yellowstone.

Okay?

In order to reach Yellowstone, we have to pass through the Rockies.

We have to pass through all these different... Like, we have to take the geography of America and break that down into an initiatic stage of spiritual development for the nation and for our party and for our movement and for ourselves.

And why is Yellowstone the end goal?

I don't fully know, but I, well, I do kind of know.

I'll tell you why, okay, you know what's interesting.

I am a guy who loves analogies, and I love literature,

but I will look you dead in the eye, and I'll tell you, this is not a metaphor. This is like literal. Because it

should be literal.

But Yellowstone, what Yellowstone

basically means is the entrance

into the American unconscious.

That's what Yellowstone means.

Yellowstone is an entrance into the subterrestrial

reality within this country of the people. It's the subterrestrial reality of the American

people.

And I can get into the

the esoteric nature of the people itself, if you want as well.

If you would like that, you know, hit Kalati just dropped a five, so you guys have earned it, I think.

So the mystical significance of the people is, is the people a sum total of different?

No.

The people basically means that there's an

inceptual principle of human existence. The Sufis would call this Al-Insan al-Kamil.

Okay? Al-Insan al-in-en-al-camille okay al-en-an-al-camil is logos translated in the islamic and

sufi mystical tradition al-islan sorry al-insan al-camille means the perfect man okay the perfect man is the archetypal

primordial man the the inceptual principle of what man is right al-insan al-camel is basically, like, materially, what is humanity?

Well, that's it.

It's like, if you want to think about it to simplify it and dumb it down, think of it as the platonic form of man, although that's not what it is.

But think of it that way if you need to. Okay. So, um, the idea is that

Al-Insan al-Kameel is an is-is-thmus. Okay, I can't say isthmus. It's like a passage between two worlds heaven and earth right so that's kind of like an analogy for

the spiritual and the immediate and the carnal what they would call the material, but that's a problematic word, right? Material.

The isthmus, okay? And man is this mediation between the spiritual realm, the realm of the infinite, the eternal, whatever, the transcendent, and the immediate, the earthly, the material or something, right?

And that is kind of the definition they give of man, right?

This is the perfect, but the perfect man is like the perfect essence of what man is.

It's got like an archetype of man, right?

Okay.

So, this is identified with logos okay so because logos is also this mediative factor

according to heraclitus and according to the philosophical tradition that the sufis are drawing

from which is definitely tracing through the Greco-Roman tradition,

but incorporates the Persian as well, of course.

Definitely, Logos is also a kind of isthmus, even for Heraclitus, right?

Because what Logos is mediating is, on the one hand, a world of infinite becoming,

and on the other hand, a world of determinate things, objects of the understanding, as Hegel would

call them. Okay? So in any case,

Logos is also this media,

it's the thing that mediates,

okay,

the infinite and the eternal,

and the,

on the other hand,

the,

you know,

the fleeting and the temporal,

okay?

So,

um, uh, so let's continue okay so al-en san al-cameel is the inceptual principle of humanity, okay?

But what is that thing?

Like, what is it?

Well, long story short, it's not a physical body.

There's no single person where you could point to them and say that is some say the prophet of is al-en-san al-camille the perfect man

but in a literal sense you cannot reduce the Sufi notion of the perfect man to an individual human body.

So if you are familiar with the Feuerbachian tradition of humanism, you will find interesting resonances with the Sufi notion of man

from Feuerbach, right? Gerald. Because Feuerbachian man is a pre-individuated kind of

uh... individuated kind of non-reducible, non-tangible, non-tangible quasi-substance slash essence,

the word that Feuerbach and Marx used was the species being, which was an ontological notion

of a being that is self-relating, that has the capacity for self-relation, right? And therefore

particularity and determination. And in any case,

Al-Insan al-Kameel is

the human. Okay.

Well, the human

is not just an individual

body or an organism like an animal.

The human is a relation, it's a relationality.

So recall how the Sufis refer to man as the itzsness between heaven and earth, right? That

denotes as a relationship. That mediative factor is responsible for the social nature of man.

In order to achieve parity with Al-Ansan al-Kameel, here's the communistic interpretation, which is

very easy, if you're familiar with both Sufism and Marx and Feuerbach. Al-Nin San al-Kameel is only real through the concrete totality of all human relations. So if you take a society, on the other hand, on the other, on the one hand, you have particular human beings with their own skills and talents and crafts and experiences and knowledge. But if I take a butcher from a butcher shop or a baker,

and I imagine it's like a fat guy with an apron,

I take that guy and I say,

this is Al-Ansan al-Kameel.

What I'm saying is this is the essence of man.

This is what exhaust everything that man is.

That's not true.

That's not true.

Why?

Because the totality of human potential is only something we could even think about when we consider society as a whole, when we consider the fact that, well, an attribute of man is that they can be bakers, but man can also be a ballerina, or a man can also be a philosopher or a rocket scientist, or a homeless guy, or X, Y, and Z, whatever. So there's a full breadth of human, In order to know what man is, and to define the man,

Al-Ansan al-Kameel, okay?

In order to define that, you need a lot of data, so to speak, right?

You need... Fucking Java, a piece of data, so to speak, right? You need...

Fucking Java, piece of shit!

Sorry.

In order to have that,

you need to have a lot of data.

Okay, that's available.

So, can you ever reach the concrete totality and say, I've exhausted every possible permutation of what man could possibly be?

No. You can't do that because it's like you can only infantestimally approximate if you were to somehow take everyone in the world right now and say all 8 billion human beings

you can

you will infinitesimally

approximate every possible

permutation of what a human being

is but there's still

going to be things that are missing

due to chance and due to the time at which you froze.

Because remember, temporality and history are part of this.

There's things that were characteristic of what man was 500 years ago.

That's no longer true today.

Well, yesterday, there's things characteristic of the

entire wealth of man that are no longer true anymore because what? About 10,000 people at least died.

Every single day, there's a specific amount of people that die, right?

Well, since every single person is unique, because

they are, that

means that when you isolate

and freeze, when you say all

8 billion people right now, that's

Al-Anan al-Kameelumil right you're still getting only an

infinitesimal approximation you're not getting the you're not getting a totality because you're

you're abstracting still because you're freezing in time.

What does abstract mean, class?

Pay attention to me carefully, class.

To abstract means to abstract from the concrete whole, the totality.

Well, when you take something at a particular point in time, you're also abstracting. Because a feature of the concrete is that it's suspended in a temporal process.

Is it not? something that's eternal, for example,

if you were to say this is what it is now,

well, you're abstracting because you're taking it at a particular point in time.

Okay, for example, if I say gulag-g-grog, let's say gulag-g let's say gulag grog from my chat i take gulag grog this is gulag grog i am abstracting when i do that

because gulagGrog is a person

with a lifespan of maybe

a hundred years.

You know, inshallah, they live a great

life.

When I isolate them at one point in time,

I'm abstracting them from their

life. I can't reduce a person to what they are at one point in time. That's abstracting. Do you understand? So it would also be true for, if I were to say all 8 billion people in the world are Al-Ansan al-Kameel, that's also an abstraction, because time is a factor in the concrete as well.

So, why am I saying this? It's still an infinitesimal approximation, but Al-Cameel is more than the sum total of all people

on earth, even more, not less. You don't understand how I'm reversing and twisting the logic for you.

According to ordinary Anglo logic, when you say all of America, the American people, you're abstracting because only concrete individuals

exist. I'm saying something different. The Sufis were saying something different. No. Al san al-kameel the perfect man is more than the aggregate

totality of all the population that is inadequate with respect to what it is. You understand? It's the opposite of what

your conventional logic would lead you to conclude. so where does that bring the people well when we say the people we're saying something very powerful when we use the signifier the people okay what we're communicating is not just

we're saying al-en san al-cameel we're saying at our concrete reality right now our relationship to the species being, to the Gatung Wesson, or Al-Nan-Aul, is obviously inadequate, but we are defined by that relationship. And that is the people. The people is an undefined

set. And the reason it's a plural, it's a plural, is because it is all the different ways in which we are not al-en-san

al-Kameel that plurality that incompleted totality the non all is what lecon would call it

that is what Lecon would call it.

That is what we are.

That is how we can refer to ourselves politically and so on, civilizationally.

When we say the people, we're not saying Al--san al-camille we're saying all the ways in which we are not that directly and therefore that we are that that we are not alan san al-camille means we are precisely in the way that we are not we are it's a plurality it's a plurality as an act of mercy in a way when we say the people it's a mercy why because we're saying the people all the people who live in the light and in relation to the essence of Gatung's Wesson or Al-Nsan al-Kamil.

All of them, the people, that that is what they are. Not, you know, Jim plus Bob, plus Deborah, plus Bernie, plus Jimmy, plus Tim, plus Tom, plus Barbara or something.

But... thing, but this indefinite relationship to the essence of the species

as it finds concrete expression in the world when when people say the problem with the people is it's not being defined and i'm like

but the people is how we refer to the essence we have in common.

We do share in essence

and if you don't believe we share in essence

then you don't think humanity is real.

You just think that you're lying.

By communicating and using language,

you're presupposing the idea we share in essence.

Otherwise, precisely what is it you mean to communicate I would rank this stream as among the top 10 most important lectures of the entire year.

And it's unfortunate because only a handful of the initiated will understand and appreciate it.

Ty Kim, ask your question.

You have one chance,

even though you're not subbed.

Are you Russian? That's the stage.

This guy is stage one consciousness.

That's stage one consciousness for you.

That's stage one.

Okay.

Now you guys love,

I gave you some new tools to refer to your reality in a practical way like whenever somebody screams at you

about bigotry it's like that's stage two consciousness for sure what that person right there

is stage one for sure stage one consciousness consciousness.

For sure, stage one consciousness. all of our ops are obviously stage two but uh that's for sure stage one consciousness

guys what is it am i russian or am i brown that's the thing i never understood am i russian or am i brown

you know you know why richard spencer never talks about our debate dane what's up thank you man the reason richard spencer never talks about our debate. Dane, what's up?

Thank you, man. The reason Richard Spencer never talks about our debate

is because

he fucked up

his racial

perceptiveness

badly, and it would discredit him if more attention was brought on the fact that he thought

I was Russian. He just assumed in that debate I was Russian. He was like, your people. So he made it

impossible to call me Brown. How can you call me Brown if you thought I was Russian? He made it impossible to call me brown how can you call me brown if you thought i was russian he made

it impossible to like racially categorize me properly because if he wants to be adversarial

toward me of course he would want to reach for the thing of oh this is some brown guy but wait a second

you thought i was russian based on how i looked so something is wrong with your racial

perceptiveness but if you go to Lebanon and if you travel to Lebanon, a whole lot of people look like me.

Like when I was talking to Jackson about this, when I was in London for a connection flight, and I went into the terminal

or the whatever you call it

the place where we're going to board

the airplane

and when I went there

and I saw everyone

sitting down

just a bunch of dudes who looked like me.

And I was like,

you know what it feels like Jackson?

I was messaging Jackson.

I was like,

remember that episode of SpongeBob

where Squidward

finds these like the tribe tribe of Squidward people

who look like him

like exactly

as he does

and he's like

wow this is like

that's what it felt like

you know

because everywhere I go

in the world

people don't know what I am ethnically.

But Lebanon is such a small country.

I actually do look Lebanese.

I look very Lebanese.

But Lebanon is so small and insignificant in the world that it's hard, you know, most people will not guess that correctly.

But when you go to Lebanon itself, it's like, wow, everyone looks just like me.

Just different variations of me,

if you go there and see for yourself,

I look very Lebanese. You're southern Italian.

I'm going to be honest.

If you're southern Italian, I'm whiter than you are.

I'm whiter than you are. If you're Southern Italian, I'm whiter than you are. I'm whiter than you are.

If you're Southern Italian.

No, if you're Sicilian.

If you're Sicilian, I am whiter than you are, for sure.

Southern Italian is probably not.

But if you're Sicilian, for sure.

If you're Sicilian, for sure, I am whiter than you. You know, uh it i did a lot of research and it turns out most white phenotypes are a combination and a mixture

between mortyx uh and iranic people and and a mixture between Nordics and Iranian people. And the Nordics actually come from the Finno-Ungaric, whatever. If you look at some Scandinavians up north, especially when they're rural, and you look them in the face, and they may have blue eyes and blind hair and all that stuff, those do not look like the archetype of a european they look clearly

somehow related to

asians some some way

they definitely yeah they look finno ugric

if you go north and white enough they they don't even look white anymore,

you know? So what we call

white is actually a mixture

between that group,

the Neolithic farmers

who, you know,

basically Neolithic farmer population is something that's common in the Middle East and in Anatolia as well, Turkey.

But then the third thing is usually ironic peoples. So I

learned something I didn't necessarily know.

Did you know that 50%

of the

Germanic barbaric invasions

into the Roman Empire

into Western Europe,

settling into Western Europe

50% of the people

that we call the Goths and the

Visigoths and the Germanics

50% of them

were Allens

Allens were an Iranian-Iranian group who came from the Caucasus.

And 50% of the people who migrated to europe during that time were allans and that's why sometimes

when you look at germans and some white people like friends or germ, sometimes when you look at them, they look like they're Middle Eastern.

For example, Christian in our party, Darg does not look white, but he is German Amish on both sides

for generations, like since before 76.

But he looks like everyone thinks he's Middle Eastern

to the point where he told me a story when he was

driving at a gas station, some guy came up to him and he goes, Assamalakum, you want to buy some

air pods? To a guy who's both parents are German for generations,

not Bavarians, Amish, okay?

So he's not Bavarian.

And then, of course, that French far right guy

who went to

uh

who went to um

uh

uh uh

Russia

and was walking around Red Square and then people just ran like, oh, al-A-A-A-Laykum, they thought he was an Arab.

Well, the truth is that the European race is not real.

It's a mixture of the groups I just mentioned

and it's not a real thing.

It's not, it's just

it's not a unified phenotype per se when you say someone is European or looks European

that can mean a lot of different things, you know?

Where does a white person and a brown person begin?

It's very difficult to understand that because, for example, Spain and Portugal and France, southern France,

and the views as well, it's just about the UK and the Anglos. No.

No, it's not.

Because you have so many British actors

and British people who look

Middle Eastern

they look like

remember that guy in Iraq

Tarik Aziz

was that his name?

Who was just like a ginger?

Like that's what Middle Eastern people look like oftentimes.

No, not Tarika Ziz.

Who is the ginger?

Fuck, what was his name?

Yeah, Isat Ibrahim al-Durie.

Like, is this guy...

Like, how would you know that this guy's name is Izot Ibrahim Alduri?

Could you tell?

Isat Ibrahim Aldeuri?

Or is this Thomas Beckingham?

How could you know? Like how could you tell, you know? You can't so that's what I'm saying that's why I'm saying that's why the reason I'm I'm saying

these things is because the new animus about Islam is not racial. It's not a racial thing. It's something deeper than even race, which is, which makes it even scarier when you think about it.

It's not a racial thing because, especially in Dearborn,

Middle Eastern immigrants do not look so profoundly different racially to white people, right?

Obviously, I mean, yeah, there's something about it.

I mean, it's like New Jersey Italians, I guess.

Nothing just so dramatic, though, right? That would warrant or justify this being a...

Because there's a lot of people who will...

A lot of right-wingers who will come to me and say,

well, Haas,

this is about different racial tribes

and conquest.

You know, it's a competition

of genes. And we're fighting over land and resources

and, and stop the LARP. It has nothing to do with that because you are not as nearly as

sensitive to other, more profoundly racially distant groups who invade

America. This one bothers you more because of religion or something, but definitely not race.

So that's what people should think about. Thank you. I want to check if Jesus'

Mortycle uploaded this thing to YouTube.

Or he definitely did to X.

I want to show you something he made that I liked.

Speaking of this whole thing And it's just like it's the

Slop Nikita Beard, Nikita Bear of the X algorithm.

Talk about

a fucking hideous, ugly disaster

fucking destroying the X algorithm.

You look at Nikita Beer

and he

looks like the most corrupted,

deformed, demented

being, you can imagine.

And I look at Nikita Beer, and I know that's why X is all fucked up, because you made the algorithm look like your face.

For sure, he did.

I'm not going to elaborate or explain what that means, but if you're on X, you understand the slop, low-quality trash

algorithm that we have.

Looks like it was made by the person who made it, which was Nikita Beer.

Jake Shields' reaction to the Stalin Post. What Stalin Post?

So this is a Shakers version

of Allah Cosmos Xizu Jinping,

but in the style of a Shaker's hymn,

which is

pleasant and nice and cool, but it doesn't have the same meme value for going hard that the original did.

That's why I'm going to show you guys this video and I'm gonna ask you guys to do something.

If you can, think about making like schizo edits of this.

Like make this Nishid into something that's like hype, like hard style.

Like, you know, those like schizo edits you see on TikTok?

Make this like a cool hype edit, schizo edit with the visuals.

I'm going to show you this has really cool visuals you could use.

I have a day so long expected, I have a day of full release.

Zion's walls are now subjected to the fire that knows no peace.

Throughout shy Lord's wide dominion hear the that knows no peace throughout shy

those wide dominion

hear the trumpet

loudly roar

all and the cosmos

cosmos cosmos

this it just goes so hard.

Like, I'm not, I don't know if I would say I'm not a, I don't really wear the cross or identify it, but this part goes so fucking hard.

This goes so hard.

Like this gave me goosebumps.

The merry part,

like this part goes hard as fuck.

Like that's such a cool fucking scene.

I'm not going to lie I'm not gonna lie. all her bankers stand in wonder

What is this that comes to pass

Burmuring like the distant thunder

And crying out at last alas

Swell the soundy things and nobles what march rock has come to pass

this this fucking like this shit goes hard as fuck

especially the musical drop at this part

cosmos cosmos colandle especially the musical drop at this part Cosmos Cosmos

Al and the Cosmos

See that's what I've been saying about our visuals

We need red red red red red red red red right

So this is like fully

Up to par with that.

Like, the more, the flooding sea of red.

That's so fucking based.

That is so cool.

That is so cool.

And this only gets

150 likes,

you know?

I knew it would not

do good on the algorithm

unfortunately.

But for our

community,

this is so good,

you know?

This goes so hard.

And this will go

hard in the future.

This will go more viral in the future, too.

When the proper context is established.

But I just love this part so much.

I like this part a lot

because it's like America is

this is the story of Jesus

this is what it's about it's

this is what it's about it's like

if I was a Sufi mystic who came to this land from 500 years ago, I would say, this is the land of Jesus. This is a Jesus land. And this Jesus is the prophet that people relate to most here and makes the most sense to people

because cosmologically

the prophet

Jesus

in this land

is

this is part

of the story

this is part

of the puzzle

like this is a

key thing

you know

and that's

why I fully

accept Christianity because and that's why I fully accept

Christianity being the dominant thing in America

in a way because it's like this is

uh uh this is like it's not it's not defective to be so strongly emphasizing that, you know.

Jesus represents something very profound, very, very profound, very critical and important within the Islamic eschatology that should not be overlooked, you know, and I gave you my take before, which I fully stand by, which is that the Protestant Reation participates in the rise of real islam you know not the abstract aslam but the concrete Islam.

So there's an abstract Islam, which culminates in Saudi Arabia, but the concrete Islam goes through different vectors of development. You know, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, the rise of the Safavids, the gunpowder empires, and the Protestant Reformation, you know?

And then concrete Islam is my word for communism.

In Pahler and the cosmos, cosmos, cosmos, cosmos, all and the... Like I want to show you something that's

CNN

like I want to show you something that CNN I mean, when I tell you guys, the shit that's happening is fucking crazy and we're sleeping on it.

What's going on on CNN?

This AI thing

This is so

based. This is so based.

Oh my God. I'm sowing out. This is

so based. This is so based This is so based

Single authoritarian party

All prices

Set by the government

All services

State owned

No individual landownership

Hell yeah No individual land ownership. Hell yeah!

No individual land ownership.

Everything is owned by the Khan.

Everything is owned by the dynasty.

Antietan motor production.

Nothing is owned by the individual.

The dynasty owns everything.

The Sultan owns everything.

This is the Asiatic mode of production.

Absolutely fucking based.

No economic insecurity. absolutely fucking based no economic incentive everyone is equal

before the con

that is based as fuck

like in principle

that's so fucking cool

like no individual Like, in principle, that's so fucking cool.

Like, no individual land ownership.

No individual land ownership.

Everyone is aligned with the dynasty.

No individual land ownership.

Kublai Khan owns everything.

Fucking best as fuck. We are all equal before kublai khan no individual land ownership so fucking based

so fucking based

you know i'm gonna give you a forbidden pill you're not nobody's ready for this shit the forbidden pill is like

if you live in a society that goes hard as fuck there's no private property you can't

why who the fuck's gonna i own this shut the

fuck up you don't get it you either get it or you don't get it like you live in a society that

goes hard as fuck it's like there's no private property. Because all you need is honor.

Fuck, you need to just take some shit for it.

It's honor.

My word, my honor.

That's my dignity.

Fuck, I need to own.

I'm going to carve something out and say, that's mine.

No, what you are is what's in your chest.

That's what you are.

Some shit that goes hard as fuck.

You need some bitch-ass eunuch.

I'm gonna just say some crazy ass shit.

Private property is low testosterone.

Private property is 100% low testosterone. And you know who talks about this? I'm not even fucking kidding. May a lot like I'm not kidding. It's not a meme. Frederick Engels literally claims that private property is low testosterone and soy.

Look at how Engels describes the Gentile Society.

Engels gave vivid descriptions of what he called Gentile Society, primitive communism. And he's like, they were athletic, vigorous, strong, like he literally gives very detailed descriptions of like a higher state of masculinity. Go read it yourself.

He literally said that.

Engle said that.

He said private property is low testosterone. the final don't worry the finding fathers were Islamic they're Muslim specifically Shia specifically Iranian Shia founding Specifically Iranian Shia.

Founding Fathers of America,

they were Iranian

Shia.

Safavid Shia

lineage. you know i connect the american civil war with the kisle bosh and this you know story of

saffavid iran so much because the American Civil War is the fitna.

It's the internal jihad within Islam, the fight for the soul of Islam.

Why? Because the United States is the abstract universal, which Hegel identifies with Islam.

It's the universal. United States. It's the one. The one. One, e pluribus unum, one nation under God. That's like the motto of the nation, e pluribus unum, right? So it's about the one. It's about defining fathers were deists. They were basically Muslims, you know, without all the rituals. They were deists, just like Robespierre, who was a Muslim, but he didn't know it. And Abraham Lincoln was a Shia, because this American Civil War was the fitna.

It was about the internal struggle within Islam.

So I'm dropping some crazy-ass shit most people are not ready for.

I'm dropping crazy-ass shit people aren't ready for, you know, but it's okay.

You know what I want?

I want to make a community of people who are not of Muslim descent comfortable with taking and appropriating and, you know, like feeling not alienated, you know, just like, you can also be part of the Islamicate world.

Why not?

They'll say, oh, it's cultural appropriation.

Who gives a fuck?

Why should you treat this as something strange and foreign and alien?

Rather than something that you can somehow relate to you know and it's the same thing and that's what i would like to do I'm What about Christology? So I need you to understand something. You are, you're like on stage two. If this is, people who are fixated on the reality that Christianity is deeper than Reddit taught you, you're still on stage two consciousness.

Okay.

Because you need to consult the Christian esoteric tradition.

The Christian esoteric tradition within Western Europe,

including Master Aikhart and all these other kinds of uh founder of the rosa curians forgot his name

and so on and so on johannis bomb and and fuck who's the

guy

that directly

influences

Hegel

from the hermetic

tradition

you need to

like

actually like

learn about

that shit

because when

you're just like

when you're just doing this cookie

cutter stage two version of Christianity

you're doing a disservice to the actual

proper Western esoteric

tradition which actually

goes farther than much

farther than what you're talking about, right?

Jacob Bohm.

Yeah.

Jacob Bohm.

Whatever. I mean, even Thomas Muncer was a profound thinker, you know?

Thomas Muncer was onto some crazy shit.

So it's much deeper than surface level Christianity, you know? fan fiction of the holy book what do you mean they uh defiled and made fan fiction of the

holy book but the deletion of entire passages. I'm not familiar with that.

Oh, the Jefferson Bible. I'm not familiar with that.

Not familiar with that at all.

He edited out every miracle in the Bible.

That's so ridiculous.

It's like a stereotypical, classical enlightenment thing to do. Thank you. You know, Well, t'n-n-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na-la-na-na-na-na-na-na-no-ne-no-ne-no-lo. tartaria

darling tartaria

be free tartaria

mountain tartaria mountain home they called you yellow stone So, okay. So, okay. All right, guys, I will see you tomorrow.

I'm going live tomorrow.

So keep that in mind.

I'll be live tomorrow.

Okay. So be there or be square. Bye-bye.