The time is now.

The bug guy, what's going on, bro?

How are you doing?

Tell you guys something really important.

I didn't think you would have to come to this, but unfortunately I have to share some incredible news.

I didn't think it would come to this.

Rifle, what's up?

We're at a decisive juncture and we're at a decisive moment and I didn't think I would have to talk about this.

JB Wolf with the ten, what's up man?

So the thing I have to tell you about

To get it off my chest.

And you have to hear it now.

If you're not going to hear it now, it's now or never type of thing.

Islam is taking over America, Sharia law is coming.

Abdul Al Sayyid just won yesterday his primary.

The Muslim hordes are unstoppable, Sharia law is coming, Islam is taking over.

There are any true Americans left like me, true white Americans?

To our left.

We have to proudly wear the infidel hat and stop the Sharia law from happening.

If they take away our bacon, if they take away our beer, they're going to make women cover up.

And that sucks 'cause I love staring at Big Booty, you know.

There it's gonna be terrible.

Gonna be terrible.

Imagine you're gonna go out at night in Miami and Houston.

You're not gonna be able to see all that.

They're gonna be covering up all that.

You ain't gonna be seeing nothing.

There's not gonna be no bacon.

Say goodbye to the diners, say goodbye to beer.

Just going to be an Islamic Sharia law country and that's just what's happening.

Sharia law is taking over, Islam is taking over, the brown Muslim hordes are taking over.

There's nothing we can do about it.

Islam is taking over America.

Islam is taking over America.

Abdul Al Sayyid just won.

Mm.

And then there's this guy, he's some Arab, Muslim Arab.

named Hazal Deen, the chairman of the Communist Party.

And this foreigner has the audacity he dares come to our country.

And now he's talking about some nonsensical Islamic mystical extremism that he's combining the two greatest enemies of America, Islam and Communism.

And he's talking all this nonsense.

He's saying that the Yellowstone Kaledra is actually the Mount Kaf, the Emerald Mountain from Sufi mysticism and from Iranic folklore.

He's saying that.

He's basically creating this form of Islam in our land, in our own country.

We need to stop Islam and worship Israel and Netanyahu.

All about.

That you need to understand Israel now.

They're just like Muslims or they're like zombies and Israel is just defending

They're God-given right because they're in the people of the Bible.

When I went to church there's a whole lot of dimensions of Israel.

When I went to church, when I opened the Bible, they're talking a whole lot about Israel in the Bible.

But you know what they're not talking about?

Some crazy nonsense that Hazal Dean's talking about.

The Kizilbosch and the Yellowstone Emerald Mountain.

All that is crazy.

Get it out of here.

Deport all the Muslims, including this Hazal Deen, this foreigner, who's trying to impose this foreign religion and foreign thing on our country.

We need to stop it from happening.

Jackson Hinkle is a brown Muslim.

He wears eye contacts to look like he has blue eyes.

He's actually a Muslim because all Muslims are brown, all Muslims are non-white.

He uh he got some advanced Iranian cosmetic surgery to blend in with us white people.

And we need to talk about Jackson Hinkle because us white people, we're sick of being infiltrated by people like Jackson Hinkle.

He's actually an Arab.

He got cosmetic surgery to blend in with us white people.

Comrade Slim, what's up?

You know, the greatest part is I could get away with it.

I could get away with going to an anti-Sharia rally, and I could get away.

They wouldn't, how are they going to know?

I could just say, I'm.

I could just say I'm one of them.

How are they going to know?

How would they know?

Well, Abdul Al-Syed won on a serious note, and that's kind of gonna set the tone and set the theme of this.

Stream actually because we have a lot to talk about because you guys are not up to date.

There's a whole lot of uh things you're not up to date on, you're not on code about, you're not familiar with, you're not aware of them, there's a lot of shifts happening in the country.

Right now, a lot of things are happening and uh you need to be filled in and you need to properly understand what the infrared

Response to everything is what the ACP response ought to be.

Frankly speaking, what about the American Communist Party and its role in all of this?

Right?

So this is where we're at.

We're going to have to have a long discussion about it, a long lecture about it.

And this is not going to be a stream you're going to want to miss.

This is going to be an important one.

And if you do miss it,

You're a fucking retard.

That's all I could tell you.

You're a fucking retard.

You're not going to make it.

Don't miss this shit.

This is going to be important.

Okay?

Because we have to talk about what's going on in the midterms.

Abdul Al-Syed is somebody that I remembered running in 2018 in the Democratic primaries.

And he lost, and I was shocked.

Was actually shocked that he lost at that time.

And it actually changed my perspective a lot that led to the MAGA communism trajectory.

I started to realize that the progressive wing of the Democratic Party didn't really have a chance, that they were not tapping into the working class demographic, that the duopoly was basically gatekeeping what they call the center, the people that could swing from independence, all those kind of people.

And that there was something fatally wrong with the strategy of the progressives and the DSA types in their attempt to build hegemony through the Democratic Party.

But now we're living in an era where for the first time ever, progressive wing of the Democratic Party and the DSA is quickly winning.

Now, there's some details we ought to keep in mind and pay attention to that are of critical importance to not lose focus on.

understand the fact that Abdul El Sayed

Is slated to lose the midterms versus his Republican opponent.

Now that's the fucking problem.

He won the primary against the Democrat, but in a swing state like Michigan, if Syed loses the Senate to whatever his fucking name is, then that's going to discredit across the entire country the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and the DSA, and it's going to bolster the forces within the Democratic Party to do their post-midterm purge.

The whole argument right now is that they're only capable of winning in already solidly blue places.

But in swing states like Michigan,

And elsewhere throughout the country, the argument is that these types of people who are progressives and are DSA and so on and so on don't have a fucking chance, right?

That's the basic argument that they're going with.

If Abdul Al Syed loses the Senate in the midterms, that is going to be that's the race I want everyone to focus on.

I don't think there's a single other race in a swing state where a DSA adjacent progressive has won.

So, Michigan, all eyes on Michigan.

We have to see the outcome of that to know how the Democratic Party is going to be moving.

Because I think after the midterms they're gonna do their purge, and I think they're gonna justify that purge on the basis of that specific type of politics being discredited in the swing state that Michigan is.

And I've seen the ads.

There's a lot of Arabs in Michigan, there's a lot of Muslims, there's also a lot of white progressives, but unfortunately.

Uh all he has to do is play those racist ads toward Abdul Al-Saeed, and you have to see some of them.

They're kind of funny.

They're playing the scary music, like the scary Middle East terrorist music.

And it's we'll go over it.

Actually, we should we should watch it right now, actually.

It's actually remarkable.

You need to understand the tone that we're working with.

Fuck is this guy's name?

What is Steven no, what's the guy's name, the Republican guy?

Mike Rogers.

Yeah, you gotta look at this and see it for yourself, okay?

Now I don't know if the ad is even posted on YouTube, if I'm gonna be honest.

I have no fucking idea.

Yeah, going up against Mark Mike Rogers is not gonna be the same thing and you're gonna learn why I'm even telling you about all this shit.

Okay, well I saw it on TikTok.

I can't seem to find it on Google, on the Internet.

But in any case, they're making him seem like he's like Osama Bin Laden.

And that could work in a place like Michigan, that could work, maybe it won't, maybe it will.

A lot of the masses are at the level where there's a profound fear of Islam.

There's a profound many Americans are afraid of Islam.

They're scared of it.

And

Those are for reasons that are probably only understood by thinkers like Franz Vanon.

I think the reason many Americans fear Islam is not even for any reason.

It's not even racism, per se.

It's the inability to categorize and compartmentalize Islam.

They don't know what Islam is.

They're not familiar with it.

They can't assimilate it within this rationally mediated, discursive universe.

So they have no way of making sense of this unknown.

It's like a burqa, which is like a completely unknown thing, right?

So Islam is just this like nagging.

Blind spot in their perfectly rationally categorized reality where they're used to black people, they're used to Mexicans, they're used to be able, they can categorize all these other ethnicities and groups that conform to various different stereotypes.

But what is the stereotype of a Muslim?

The stereotype of a Muslim is that they have bombs and they blow shit up.

Think about that.

Everyone's stereotype is more or less rooted in something rational.

I mean, even racist stereotypes that are created by the right wing.

Let's talk about their stereotypes toward Mexicans.

They say Mexicans work at Home Depot and they hop the border.

Well, because a rational person wants to make a living.

They say Jews love money.

Okay, well, who doesn't love money?

They say the Chinese, I mean, the stereotype is the Chinese are good at math or something, right?

Well, that's perfectly something you can understand and relate to.

But Muslims and Arabs who just bomb shit and blow shit up, there's no way to rationalize that.

So it's this irrational thing.

It's this inability to categorize, right, that Franz Fanon talks about, which you have uniquely with Islam, right?

Master, what's up?

And that's really where a lot of this is coming from.

Oh my god, Slava, thank you so much for the five.

I appreciate you so much.

So we basically, oh, with the six.

Thank you so much, Slava.

I appreciate you.

So you basically have a unique fear of Islam because there's an opening and Islam is ascendant worldwide, whether we want to talk about it or not.

There's a lot of energy coming from the Islamic world right now because the world has not, the confrontation between the modern world and Islam has not happened yet.

It's happened with China, it's happened with Russia, it's happened with others.

But the world of Islam is uncharted territory.

So as the world confronts Islam still, the modern age does, there's a lot of energy that's being harnessed and coming from that.

And there's a lot of fear.

You know, the thing that happened in Spain that was orchestrated by Israel with all the Muslims.

The Moroccans running into the old Spanish city in Africa that they still have.

That's a thing, I don't even want to touch that question.

Because, on the one hand, you're like, well, this is clearly a case of classical European colonialism in Africa left over.

But then you also learn that this has been part of Spain since, what, the 1500s or the 1400s?

And so.

It's

I mean, they were living there s for five hundred years.

It's like

You know what I mean?

I I I don't I'll let the Spanish and the Moroccans and them sort that out.

I don't even want to intervene on that question.

Frankly, I'm s st stumped.

It's like, well, it looks like it's a form of colonialism for sure.

But on the other hand

Morocco is all is actually also colonizing Western Sahara and the Sahrawi people, who I support, actually.

So who knows?

Something interesting the thing I'm talking about with Islam, by the way, it's happening in Spain as well.

Spain is undergoing this energetic revival, and there's a lot of energy in Spain right now.

Spain is learning that it's not doesn't want to just be part of Europe.

It hasn't really fully reconciled with the Spanish Civil War.

Spain looks like it's on an interesting trajectory.

And as one of those peace-loving people who loves peace.

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I want to see a future where Spain and Morocco.

And the Western Sahara all come together.

And

No religion or culture dominates one or another, but you have a beautiful fusion, right?

No one's being subjugated or humiliated or dominated but a fusion.

Is it not possible?

I think it is.

So that's my speculation.

I don't want to intervene too much on these matters that I have no, but the Israel clearly understands that the European and the Western psych has a profound fear of Islam.

This idea of hordes of Muslims just coming in and taking over that provokes a lot of fear.

A lot of fear, right?

And

I am not just going to say that's racism.

I'm going to say that's just a lack of contact.

It's a lack of understanding.

But the problem is when you don't understand something and it's just coming at you, it's like you don't even have time to reflect on it or think about it.

That's why, in principle, I'm against mass immigration.

Because I do think people should interact and have a dialogue and come to understand each other.

But when it's happening so suddenly and there's not even enough time or space for the interaction to actually be organic, it causes chaos, it causes conflict, right?

But we can't do anything about it.

It's not within our control.

There's a huge thing going on with Islam in America.

Chinese people have Chinatown, Indians have India Town, Jews have Tunnelville.

Sorry to Jews for making fun of you.

Uh all sorts of different ethnic and religious enclaves exist in America.

Which are pretty uniform culturally and represent migrant and immigrant populations.

But for some reason, Dearborn, Michigan just scares the shit out of people.

There's a hook there that's just like, this is fucking an invasion.

This is doesn't belong in America.

This is terrifying.

These people are aggressive terrorists.

There's no other group for whom this fear applies.

There's all sorts of new immigrants that come to America.

Look at, for example, from Vietnam.

They have these places that are mainly just Vietnam, and it's like nobody cares, but like Muslims and Arabs, there's something there.

Now, why is that?

That's the question we should think about.

That's why I'm so interested in Islam and I've taken this Islamic turn.

Some people think I'm trying to insult Americans and I'm trying to just troll them and I'm trying or I'm just trying to, I don't know.

be insensitive.

But the truth is, I think that

There could be productive a productive outcome from thinking about Islam in the American context.

I think it could be very interesting, very fruitful.

uh creation of an American Islamic mythos.

I love this idea that Yellowstone is the Emerald Mountain, for example, where all the jinn come from.

Just like things like that I think are very interesting.

There is a Chinese way in which we dwell within the cosmos, even in America.

China is the land of Tian, of heaven.

So we're Chinese.

We do live in one world where we part of us is Chinese, part of us is Russian, part of us is African, part of us is also Islam.

And we need to think about how we can.

How can we come to terms with and understand our experiences and our reality through the lens of Islam, partially at least.

Just like we would do so from the lens of Chin the Chinese, the Taoism and Buddhism and so on, Confucianism.

So that is my view on the matter, frankly.

Sayop, thank you.

Appreciate it.

So, my take on it is basically that.

And by the way, Yellowstone, what's up?

And if you think about it, it's quite.

What a great name, by the way.

You think about it, and it's quite beautiful in a way because.

I am over the conflict between America and Islam.

I'm focused now on the conflict within Islam.

Like, isn't it beautiful?

You guys are my primarily Christian, hugely redneck audience.

Your my Tartarians

And

What you're being introduced to is a very revolutionary, repressed type of Islam, primarily Shia, primarily occulted throughout most of history, extremely heterodox, and considered heretical by the Muslim authorities and establishments of the world.

And this is the Islam I introduced to you.

And isn't it beautiful how there's this relationship of instant recognition between that we can have?

Kimmer, what's up?

And the various

Repressed Christian traditions, the shakers, all these Protestant traditions.

It's like Thomas Munzer and Ismail, or Thomas Munzer and Junaid.

It's like they can just see each other and understand it's one struggle.

It's always been one struggle around the world for the same thing.

And that's how I think America can transcend this fear of Islam.

The way America should transcend the fear of Islam is to take up the moral authority of our own mystical religious traditions, the Shakers.

There's something very deep and powerful that's not about ethnicity, it's not about religious tribalism.

It transcends that fundamentally, and it is truly universal.

And it originates from Quakers and Shakers and all these different groups.

Amish, all these different groups that exist in America, even Mormons, it's like they have their own transcendental.

Relationship to the sublime that is fully compatible with an understanding with Islam that says we have maybe differences, we're coming from different places in the world, but there's no fear anymore.

We don't you why would when you assume the reins of moral leadership and moral authority, then the Muslims of this country will be forced to follow you.

You know, you won't be insecure anymore about another group coming and invading you because you're focusing on the invasion that's happening within.

'Cause all of our corruption within our civilization is within, ultimately, right?

So, I didn't want to talk about religion, actually.

It wasn't my intention to make this stream about religion at all.

But it's worth mentioning because I have to be self-aware to some extent at least.

Whatever this progressive swing that's happening, it's very Muslim-coded for some reason.

It's very Islamic-coded.

Hassan Piker is involved, Abdul El-Syed, Zoran Mamdani.

It's almost like there was Judeo-Bolshevism before, and now there's an Islamo-Bolshevikism.

socialism or something.

I don't know.

And myself, I'm not a coincidence either.

The difference between me and all those other people though is that I am mainly a troublemaker within Islam.

I'm the rogue heterodox one

The one that's cast out and ostracized and would be beheaded for my beliefs.

And so I come to you.

I'm larping, by the way, about this whole thing because I was raised in America, I'm not even this whole story is fake, but thematically I like the idea of it, you know.

I like the narrative, I like the structure of that narrative, I like the logic that is underlying it, basically.

So yeah, in any case, um

We have to be aware of that to some extent and uh think about it uh at least a little bit.

But that's not what I wanted to talk to you about.

I wanted to talk to you about

Something that is not popular.

But is the truth?

something that is less exciting than MAGA communism.

But I want you to understand the logic behind MAGA communism, and this is part of why I made the post that I did today.

And most people don't understand this, so I'm going to basically explain it to you.

I hate when people.

You know what fucking word I hate?

I told you so.

I fucking hate how useless that is.

I hate.

Every time I reference these geese people in a positive way, you guys all look at me puzzled.

I see your what you're staring at me in the chat, I know what's on your face, I see the look on your face.

And you stare at me like I'm fucking crazy and I've lost it.

Like oh, should we be shit libs?

I need you to understand something.

You need to be so ruthlessly fucking pragmatic that you've transcended Samsara.

Do you understand that I dwell in a state of year zero at every infinitesimal second of my life?

Do you think there's an ideological conflict within me?

I live in year zero.

I meditate in year zero.

That's where I'm fucking at.

Okay?

Congratulations, though.

What?

Where's the meat and potatoes?

Well, these people.

One of them is kind of smart.

I just read something that they wrote.

And they have a term that I like because they replied to my post because I called them out saying they're right deviationists.

Because I said I am sick

Of the I told you so mentality of the marginal left.

You know who was right for 10 years?

Jason Unruh.

During the Bernie campaign and other things, you know what people like Jason Unruh and Finn Bull would say?

They would say,

This is some reformist sockdam nonsense and it's going to lead to betrayal and more imperialism.

And were they wrong?

No, they weren't wrong.

They were proven right every time.

It's almost like they're no stradamis.

They were proven right every time.

In fact, there's a Maoist from nineteen seventy one who's about eighty five years old now.

And since that time, he has been proven right every single year.

He's right.

He's no Stradamus.

Nothing's ever gonna happen.

This is all just a bunch of baloney.

This is not gonna lead to socialism or communism or revolution.

This is all an illusion.

It's all a con, it's all a scam.

It's all a trick.

Well that guy's on life support now.

And it's beeping and it's beeping and he's gonna die having been right his whole fucking life.

But tell me one thing, what impact did that guy make on history?

So Jason Unruh was right in 2015, okay?

Did he get any credit for it?

No, that just shows how immoral and injust the world is.

Okay, then go protest and light yourself on fire.

See if anyone gives a fuck.

What's the solution?

Give me the meat and fucking potatoes.

Do you understand what I'm trying to fucking say?

You don't get any fucking brownie points for being right.

You don't get any credit for saying I told you so.

You get credit for changing reality.

That's the only thing you get credit for.

For changing and affecting reality and fucking being there somehow.

Nobody gives a fuck if you have the foresight to understand that Mom Dani or Bernie Sanders is not going to be the second coming of Lenin.

Nobody gives a fuck about that.

What matters is what you prove in practice.

Nobody gives a shit how theoretically correct you are.

You know?

It frustrates me that people don't understand that, by the way.

It profoundly frustrates me that people don't understand.

Nobody gives a fuck if you're right.

Oh, we were right about the D S A when this whole thing that yes, what's gonna happen is we're gonna say we were right about this whole thing.

Are we gonna get any credit for it though?

No.

If we're not there, we're not gonna get any fucking credit.

You wanna know what you do get credit for?

When you target the contradictions, when you mold yourself in the light, the dark light of the contradictions, when you say, okay, there is a conflict within the Democratic Party, let's articulate this narrative, let's articulate this contradiction in a clear way to the masses and be there every step of the way with them.

We don't have to be in the Democratic Party, we obviously don't have to be in the DSA, but we should be in the discourse.

And people don't understand that distinction.

We don't have to be in their institutions and surrender our independent Communist Party, but we should our discourse should be there.

Every step of the fucking way we should be there.

We should discursively, in some sense, take a side.

We should discursively point out that.

Within the Democratic Party, there's some concentrated effort and attempt to push.

I'm seeing crazy shit.

I mean, our movement is lagging behind.

We're becoming marginal.

We're becoming fucking marginal.

I saw Bill fucking mayer pull up the MUG, Donald Parkinson's literal creation.

He got kicked out of it or something now.

You know, that's how it works on.

That's what happens when you're not iron-fisted, by the way.

You'll create some shit and then you get pushed out of it because you're weak.

Every Donald Parkinson is the creative genius behind MUG.

He's the guy who fucking created all that shit.

And he just got pushed out on marginalized because he wasn't strong enough, right?

But Bill Mayher covered them.

Bill Mayher went on camera, looked in camera.

How many of you fucking predicted this?

How many of you were right about this?

Bill Mayher went on camera and said.

I'm gonna potentially vote for J.D.

Vance.

If these people take over the Democratic Party, I'm out.

You know how many fucking Democrats are saying that now?

People that youth would think are the bluest, the vote blue, no matter who people, the most dyed-in-the-wool Democrat types who for years shit-lib Democrat, like the most fanatical Democrat types, are all going the Drew Pavloo way and saying, This is not my party anymore.

I'm leaving.

I'm going to go vote for the Republicans now.

That's where things are going.

That's the atmosphere.

None of us are even in it.

We're not even tapped in.

We're fucking on the sidelines watching.

That's my fucking problem.

Why are we not at the avant-garde of this whole fucking thing?

We should be at the avant-garde discursively, informationally.

We should be at the avant-garde of everything.

It's not enough to just say the Democrats are bad.

Yes, we know they're bad.

Isn't everything I'm saying the logic of megacommunism?

You know, it's so funny there's not a lot of people intelligent enough to understand this.

During MAGA communism, the whole point of MAGA communism, and it was so so simple.

So many people were saying, Well, Trump is bad.

Trump is bad.

MAGA is gonna be uh this is not gonna lead you think MAGA is gonna lead to communism?

You know how many people would look at me and say, You think this is gonna lead to communism?

MAGA is gonna bring us communism.

You think Trump is a good anti-imperialist who's gonna end all the wars?

And you just gotta hit him with that Leninist stare.

You just gotta hit him with that Leninist stare.

You just got to hit these people with the Leninist stare and just be like, you so don't get it.

You really don't fucking get it.

The reason why I semi-sympathize with the geese people is because although they don't get it either, their logic is not far from getting it.

Like their logic is kind of in the direction of, okay, you're kind of starting to understand.

Just a little bit, right?

Just in terms of their logic, not the conclusions they reach.

And it's like, that's the point.

Nobody fucking thinks that any of these avenues or vectors of radicalization, if they are left to the leadership of the people who m monopolize them, are going to amount to anything that is, you know, uh c con you know, concordant with the goals of Marxists or communists.

But you can't just be dis you can't just desist yourself from objective contradictions and make the only contradiction between your correct consciousness and the false consciousness of everyone else.

In other words, you can't just say, I'm right, I'm in the know, and everyone else is wrong because they're stupid.

That's not a contradiction.

That's a subjective contradiction.

That's not an objective contradiction.

For it to be an objective contradiction means it's affecting the masses directly in some way.

Not indirectly, directly.

Like this is a objective vector of polarization among the masses themselves.

Okay.

And that's why we went with the MAGA communism thing, because MAGA was an objective contradiction that was going on within the Republican Party, and at the time that was the only force within US politics which was channeling any anti system or dissident energies at all.

So it's not crazy for me to say that when that

energy that we saw in MAGA.

We're starting to see it in the Democratic Party itself now.

That's the truth.

We are.

I don't know what to fucking tell you.

I have a lot of wise guys in my community who wag their fingers, they go Haas.

You know, this is all Soros, right?

Okay.

And and MAGA was all Sheldon Adelson.

But you don't understand that even if there's all this dirt and pollution, whether that's ideologically or whether that's institutionally.

There is this is has become a receptacle of objective contradictions.

And we have to mold our politics and our language and our discourse and our interaction with what's going on in the country in the language of the contradictions.

See, I don't believe in tailing Republicans or tailing Democrats.

I don't believe in Republican entryism and I don't believe in Democratic Party entryism.

But you want to know what I do fucking believe in?

Contradiction entryism.

Like the contradiction is our object.

Let's respond to the contradiction.

Let's articulate ourselves in the light of the contradiction with no terms and conditions.

You have to isolate concretely the correctness of your position, not just abstractly.

That's Leninism 101.

I am sick of marginalization.

And it's what the geese people call marginalism.

And you know what?

They're right.

Jason Unruh, that's marginalist LARP.

Caleb Maupin, marginalist LARP.

All of that shit is marginalist LARP.

You're on the fucking margins.

You're sitting on the fucking sidelines, crossing your arms, content with your own farts about how correct you are theoretically.

Okay, you're correct abstractly, but are you correct concretely?

That's the Leninist question.

Are you correct concretely?

Have you actually fucking put yourself there and affected reality based on your correctness in any kind of way?

No, you're crossing your fucking arms, content with the fact that you have been correct all along, abstractly.

How correct can you be if it's an abstract correctness?

Isn't part of being correct being correct practically and being correct concretely?

Why should we not occupy a space of calling out the hypocrisy of Bill Mayher and say, Bill Mayher, you used to say vote blue no matter who, but now you're changing your tune because there's these candidates with ideas you disagree with?

Why don't we say that shit?

It's not like we give a fuck about the Democratic Party or that we'll ever vote for any Democrat ever, but just like we would tap into the ring when it came to MAGA, why don't we do the same shit here?

Like why don't we involve ourselves in these contradictions?

We should make sense of them the most because we actually know what the fuck is going on, do we not?

If we're so in the know and if we're so correct, then aren't we the people who actually know what the fuck is going on in the first place to be able to make the judgment that, hey,

You know, although we know the causes of why this is, simultaneously we know what kind of war this is.

According to Heraclitus, you want to talk about Dark Mali.

Heraclitus says war is the father of all things, everything is war.

You need to understand the wars that are going on, the conflicts that are going on.

We are at our best when we understand those.

When you take a position, when it's the DSA versus Bill Maher or John Fedderman and you're fucking on the sidelines, you know where you're sitting, on the cuck chair.

Just like back then when it was Mitch McConnell versus MAGA, and you just pity both sides can't lose, you're sitting on the cuck chair.

When you're looking at this shit going on in the Democratic Party and you're just sitting on the chair, you're sitting on a cuck chair.

You're missing out opportunities.

You're missing out vectors of radicalization that will ultimately conclude in people joining our party and seeing the light to the correctness of our position.

But we need to actualize our position concretely and we need to find the proper concrete context by which our position is necessary in the first place.

And none of us like to see the fact that DSA has maintained its relevancy still in 2026.

Why?

Because many of you and many of us were in the DSA 10 years ago or five years ago or two years ago.

And we consider it a past stage in our own development, and we're right about that.

So none of us are happy to see that the DSA has more longevity than we thought it would, based on our own personal subjective development.

But the facts are as they are.

The DSA is relevant.

Should we join the DSA?

Absolutely fucking not.

But can we afford to just

From the margins, pretend that something isn't going on in this country?

No, we can't.

We have to actually appreciate what's going on for what it is.

And people might ask, well, what's your objective guidance on this matter?

Well, my objective guidance is very simple.

Insert yourselves in these conflicts and take the right side.

You will be surprised.

Imagine if you

We're a voice for DSA people or voters within the Democratic Party who are anti-Israel.

And you inserted yourself in the conflict between the explicitly pro-Zionist wing and the pro-Palestine wing.

And you were like a fighter and a warrior.

Everyone loves a warrior.

You know, in battle, when a man runs up with a sword and just starts fucking.

Chopping everyone's heads off and shit.

Nobody gives a fuck where that guy came from.

People will fucking appreciate that guy.

And so ACP should what we should do is we should insert ourselves in this conflict discursively, culturally, informationally, in a way that makes people come around to and appreciate our voice, that we're speaking for them.

We understand you, we're speaking for you.

It's like, that's how you need to be.

You need to be able to be their voice for the contradiction that they're in.

Not the contradiction you want them to be in, but the contradiction that they're actually in.

You know?

Now it would be nice to just say, oh, I'm just going to.

Watch this play out.

We can't afford to do that.

We're wasting energy if we do that.

We have to tap in.

Just like we're willing to tap in with MAGA, we have to tap in with this.

And um

I really think this stream is going to be very important because I see hurdles and obstacles to people understanding this, and it has a lot to do with consciousness.

Because there's something very awkward about everything that's going on.

That makes this different from MAGA communism.

Very different from MAGA communism.

There's something awkward happening.

There's an elephant in the room that I'm not addressing, so to speak.

And you guys need to fucking hear it.

And

The elephant in the room to introduce you to it is the problem of consciousness.

There's a spectrum.

At one point, you were politically apathetic, or you were a liberal, or you were a Republican, or you were a libertarian, or you were something else, or you were a normie.

You had some journey that led you here to the infrared Kizelbosch.

Something along your development and your journey led you here to the American Communist Party, to this movement, to infrared, to Midwestern Marx, whatever you want to call it.

Okay, but that was a journey of development.

When you interpret that as a journey of consciousness, then you become biased in terms of how you see reality.

Because the DSA shitlib phase was behind is behind you.

You had to overcome that.

You had liberal biases, you had politically correct biases, genuine biases that you had to confront, that you had to overcome, and that you had to transcend and move beyond to arrive at where you are now.

But for many of you, you haven't made peace with your past.

You're still fighting and repressing the liberal inside of you.

You're still fighting your own past.

You're still searching for a way to justify why you left where you were before, right?

And part of how you do that is by bracketing off, you know, lesser stages of development.

Whether it's DSA or anything else, and being like, they're dead, and we're on the rise.

No, what's happening is that you have made it out.

But not everyone is at the same level of development as you.

And what makes this whole thing awkward in terms of the elephant of the room, elephant in the room, is

There's no precedent for this within Marxism.

Now typically, if there was a direct line between just Republicans or Democrat normies and being Marxists and Communists,

This would be profoundly easy because we have a word for that in Marxism: correct consciousness, revolutionary consciousness, class consciousness versus false consciousness.

You could just say, in my past, I was in a state of false consciousness.

But that's not quite true.

For most of you here, your past was defined by consciousness, hyper-consciousness.

They even had a word for it.

It was called woke.

You were conscious.

You were too conscious.

And what you were taught by infrared and by ACP or Midwest or whatever you came from, what we taught you how to do is to go beyond and transcend your consciousness, to appreciate the unconscious, to appreciate the implicit, to appreciate the thing that cannot be consciousness.

So we are post-woke in a way, right?

And like this is what you learned from us.

And Marxism doesn't have a precedent for that.

Marxism doesn't have a precedent for a stage of subjectivity that transcends consciousness.

Marxism has always understood that the development is from lack of consciousness to consciousness.

But the awkward thing for us is that we are post-consciousness, we are post-woke.

Whatever state Harold, what's up?

Whatever psychological state, ideological state, whatever you want to call it, subjective state, we have achieved here.

It's an altered state of consciousness.

It's some kind of insight that is just not about just being conscious, but it's an understanding that primarily is unconscious, it's implicit.

There's a profound mystical element.

There's a profound, I mean, this is dark Mali, this is dark Marxism.

This is what we mean by infra-woke, by the way.

The ability to comprehend something like the golden Stalinist center, where you can actually genuinely understand how.

You know

You need to be cognizant of the dialectical element, you need to be cognizant about how something can be revolutionary in in terms of consciousness, but be reactionary in terms of its practical content, that there's this disjunction between these two things.

And that is like a state of enlightenment.

It sucks that Nick Land stole the term dark enlightenment because that's what this really is.

It's a dark enlightenment.

It's a black enlightenment, you know, it comes from Sufism, I guess.

But this is a black enlightenment, your post-consciousness.

And another awkward thing about the consciousness paradigm within Marxism is that in the information age, this is the thing that's always had me fucked up, if you ask me.

Like, this is one of the unresolved quandaries of infrared theory, which I have solved now, I think, but in the past, no.

You know, we somehow have this strict distinction.

Why did I go so hard against leftists in the past?

And this is I hope you follow through everything I'm saying.

Why did I hate leftists so much?

Because we had in in classical Marxism an understanding.

You can forgive the non-conscious masses who are like in false consciousness.

You have to forgive them and be patient with them.

But for those who are educated and conscious and know better, they're unforgivable when they make the wrong choices and wrong decisions.

Like, okay, you can be patient with normies who are just not educated enough.

But for when someone becomes conscious and familiar with this ideology and this rupture of ideology, then suddenly they become not an object, but a subject.

A subject who has to be evaluated in terms of their decisions, their ideological decisions, the brands they chose to follow, the positions they chose to take.

You go from a childlike state to someone who has moral agency for the first time.

And so it's like I've always considered left as people who have moral agency, but are choosing immorality.

Usually in Marxism that's not how you see the masses.

The way you see the masses is not a bunch of moral agents becoming immoral, but people primarily defined, almost passively by the way, by their material conditions.

Well, of course, in the absence of socialist consciousness, in the absence of enlightenment,

People are primarily going to be defined by their material conditions.

You have to be patient and forgive the masses for that fact, right?

And so, but when it comes to people who have become enlightened, who do wake up and become woke to Marxist consciousness, that's a rupture.

Everyone understands it's a rupture.

Whenever you started becoming a Marxist, I'm pretty sure for most of you, it was a rupture.

That was a metabolic break with your past form of consciousness.

Suddenly you enter into the realm.

Of moral agency for the first time.

And so I saw other Marxists and leftists the same way.

But now I'm wise enough to understand something I didn't before, because there's no precedent within Marxism for this.

That's not the highest stage of development.

Theoretical consciousness

And

Enlightenment consciousness, that is not the highest stage.

There's a stage higher than that.

And from the perspective of this higher stage, which is almost like a mystical enlightenment,

From the perspective of the infrared vision, if you will, we see.

conscious Marxist activists and leftists, we have to see them as just as passive as normie masses.

Like and this problem has become evident

primarily in the information age, for a very simple reason.

In the information age, for the first time ever,

The development of consciousness has become mass-induced and predictable.

It is predictable.

It is like.

It is mechanically induced in a way.

It's like you are not an active subject when you go on a radicalization pipeline through Discord and through memes to adopt a politically extreme ideology or to adopt communism or Marxism.

That no longer interpolates you as an active moral agent or moral subject.

You are a statistic who is the passive receptacle of material conditions because information has become a material force.

So, consciousness is no longer the decisive break that makes you a moral agent anymore.

You understand what I mean?

Like, you have to treat.

In the way that Marxist, the stereotypical DSA socialist would be like, Okay, how do you explain all these bad, rotten people who are poor?

They'll be like, Well, it's just because their material conditions create this environment.

But then in the information age there's another awkward problem.

We have to start treating

Political consciousness itself, even in its most advanced form, as a passive, passively induced consequence of information environments, echo chambers, algorithms, socialization dynamics that are happening because of online dynamics.

Gladio, what's up?

And that's the difference.

That that that was not the case in Lenin's time.

In Lenin's time, when you started picking up the books and reading Marx and initiating yourself into Marxist communities, you made a choice.

You forsook

You had to forsake your prior class background, because usually you were a class traitor.

You had to completely devote your life to a new cause.

Like you were actually a moral agent.

That's why it's really interesting.

Why is it that Bolsheviks and Marxists in the past used to be so selfless?

They used to be so like, I'm fully just going to devote myself to this.

I'm going to abandon my prior life, abandon my class interests, my immediate material interests for this cause.

But then today, if you go into a DSA meeting or if you go into a Discord full of Marxists and you ask them, hey, why are you a Marxist?

They're like, well, I just want health care.

Or some of them will say, I want my life to improve.

I want my material conditions to improve.

I want better things for me.

I want to unionize interpretive dance instructors so that we have a better life.

I want to make this all about my particular conditions, my particular material conditions, because I'm the revolutionary subject.

I'm the working class.

You know, I work for an HR department and get a salary of $80,000 a year and I live in Manhattan.

I'm the working class, as you can see, right?

And that was not the case before in the Marxist or socialist tradition.

Most of the time, a lot of these people were class traitors.

And if they weren't class traitors, if you asked them, hey, why are you a Marxist?

Why are you a socialist?

They would say something along the lines of, it's my duty to history.

It's a necessity.

We have to do this for humanity.

We have to do this for the supremacy of the proletariat.

I sacrifice and lay down my life for this cause.

And that's not the case anymore.

There's a self-serving element that when it comes to mass socialist movements online or Marxist communities on the internet, where it's primarily self-serving and it's based on the immediate desires, right?

So why is that?

Well, because being conscious theoretically or politically no longer interpolates you as an active moral subject anymore.

It is a predictable outcome as a consequence of two things information civilization,

We are always now informed.

We're all woke now.

We are all woke now.

Like, do you know what the awakening part of woke was?

Do you know why George Floyd happened in 2020, right after the lockdowns?

Because when we were all on lockdown, that was the way everyone became forced to be part of information civilization.

When your only way of reaching the outer world was through information, and that was your only connection to society.

You officially had to be woke.

You had to be awake.

You had to define your reality in terms of discourse, discursively mediated.

Meaning, okay?

And that is what that's how you you were sleeping before, but now you're awakened.

You're like, I've awakened to the Twitter hive mind of hashtags.

It's like you you had to because during lockdown, when your only way of interacting with the wider world was through online.

That was how everyone became woke.

And the way, and this was not a left or right thing, because as Ari Astor depicted in Eddington, this was also the right on the right, and for leftists as well.

It was the same woke thing that took over everyone, the woke mind virus.

The woke mind virus is just information civilization.

And after COVID and after the lockdowns, there's no type of concept.

You can't go pre-woke.

It's not possible.

You can't return to the whatever type of.

dormancy was before that.

So the very term woke proves the superfluousness of consciousness.

Consciousness is no longer what defines moral agency anymore.

But you need to understand that was not the case a hundred years ago.

One hundred years ago,

Being awake was the privilege of only a few people who dedicated their entire lives to this mission, but it's become democratized now and that's what woke means.

Woke basically means everyone is now conscious.

Now if you read Boris Groys' book, The Communist Postscript, he talks about how language is the currency of communism.

That's the extent of the introduction I'm going to give it to you, right?

Well, in the age of a transition between the capitalist and socialist mode of production like the one we're living in now, it makes sense that everyone went woke, whether they're right wing or left wing or something.

Because language and discourse is becoming the currency of our civilization as well as we're transitioning from one mode of production into the other.

And if you go to communist states historically, or even China today, or even post-communist states like Russia today, you will find that people are just profoundly aware of the world around them in ways that

Americans usually were not, right?

And so

We deal we're dealing with a really awkward situation where we're not on this equal playing field with the rest of the Marxists and Socialists.

It's not like Lenin versus Kotzky anymore.

Lenin versus Kotsky versus Bernstein versus other people in that movement.

Those were people on the same dimension of moral agency arguing over what is the good, what is the bad, what's the right, what's the wrong.

We don't have this common discourse any more.

We are quite literally above

The rest of the left in terms of our stage of development, because they're stuck in consciousness and we've achieved something post woke.

Ones if you're still fucking here, holy shit.

Don't know if my fucking stream just crashed, holy shit.

'Kay.

Just making sure the stream didn't crash, you could stop.

Okay, so.

Uh

Now, I'm not saying that's cause for arrogance or that we have to tap out of the discourse at this point because we can't.

But don't you guys understand that?

When we argue with leftists online, there is no chance they're going to be won over to us.

What's actually happening is that we're asserting the hegemony and the dominance of our discourse to make it easier for them to transition when they make that choice.

But the transition from being woke to post-woke or being woke to infra-woke.

is just as much of a metabolic break as the transition from being unwoke to being woke.

Like, remember when you were not a Marxist and you learned about Marxism for the first time?

And how crazy that like how much of a decisive break that transition was?

The transition from being a cookie-cutter Marxist or leftist to being infrared is just as much a metabolic break.

That is a real break of moral decisiveness.

That's a real choice.

That's like the choice when Lenin made to be a Marxist.

For the first time, you're a moral agent who's morally responsible.

You're not just someone who's induced passively by algorithms or groomed into something.

You're actually making a fucking choice for the first time ever.

Because why?

Because when you transcend consciousness itself.

You comprehend that the normative dimension is not preempted by your conscious choices.

It's also preempted by your practical existence.

Like how you are aligned with the cosmos, how you are aligned with the microcosmos that we call society.

How you treat your parents, your family, the people around you, what kind of character you have, what kind of human being are you.

how much you actually have consideration for your fellow man.

How much are you sensitive to the sacred feelings of the masses, to the things that are that typically would only be in religion, right?

How much of a sensitivity do you have to that?

How much of that do you understand the meaning of it?

The unspoken, the hidden, the thing that's not just virtue signaling, that can't be just economized as virtue signaling.

Infrared consciousness opens you up to an entire world that you never used to see before, right?

Because it's not just consciousness anymore, it's more like a dialectic of.

Of sleep and wakefulness.

We talk about the need in Marxism for people to acquire the correct consciousness.

But there's what we learn from the experience of history, if you ask me, is that when we measure things by virtue of consciousness alone, you get opportunists like Khrushchev and Gorbachev and others.

You get the great purges that are necessary.

You get the need for the cultural revolution in China because consciousness is not enough.

Because even if everyone becomes woke and conscious,

Bad people can still disguise themselves in the language of consciousness.

And how do we make moral qualitative distinctions between the character of different people based on that?

We can't.

So there's a step above consciousness that we have to attain, which I think we learned from the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

I think Xi Jinping is someone who's attained.

the level above consciousness.

Everyone needs to be very intensely following what I'm saying here.

After the Cultural Revolution, when Xi Jinping was sent down to the countryside and he learned from the sacred wisdom of the people,

That was infra-woke.

That was post-woke.

Like, if the Red Guards were woke when they were sent down to the countryside to learn the everyday sacred life of the masses, that was the stage of the post-woke.

That was the way you could finally comprehend the concrete, not just this ideological, abstract, obsessive consciousness anymore, but something that transcends consciousness.

Some kind of embedded, I don't know.

Um, we don't even really have the word for it.

Some kind of sage-like, sagacious insight into the sacred, into the uh materially real that's that's unspoken.

And Xi Jinping, because he had that experience, he's like a sage.

And he's that that's why Xi Jinping is Xi Jinping, you know?

But that's above consciousness.

Do you understand?

That's above consciousness.

It's not on there's nothing Xi Jinping is conscious of that makes him a sage.

Because it's not just about

What you're conscious of and what you're not conscious of.

It's about.

To what extent have you resigned yourself to the absolute?

To what extent do you actually decisively resign yourself to the real and give way to the real and accept reality for what it is?

To what extent are you at peace with what reality actually is?

To what extent have you discovered through your sixth sense?

The concrete content of what before was only in your consciousness.

Before you had consciousness, which meant you virtue signaled, you communicated how conscious you were.

But what was the thing that you were talking about or thinking about before?

What is that object?

When you acquire a relationship to that object,

That is based on an aesthetic sensibility.

That I can sense and feel this thing.

And I know what it is concretely.

Because it now defines how I actually, in a somber way, relate to the world around me and the people around me.

Not as a colonizer or a conquistador, imposing my consciousness on others, but by discovering the wisdom.

Of how reality is already reconciled in such a way that renders my consciousness superfluous.

In other words, what the Sufis talked about as the annihilation of the self into God, whatever you treasure and you cling on to, that you discover by way of consciousness, the true and consistent materialism says that at that moment you've reached enlightenment, you then have to give way.

Because the thing that you're thinking about in your consciousness and that you're talking about with your words, with your mouth, is something you now have insight into as already materially real.

For it's very simple.

For how could you have achieved this level of consciousness were it not for the fact that it is already materially real?

It is already materially there and real, and you have to go through consciousness in order to appreciate that fact.

So, some people might misunderstand this and say, okay, Haas, so what you're basically saying is that consciousness is unnecessary, that I can just dwell in immediate existence, and I don't need consciousness because it's already here.

And I say, no, you will not appreciate the here-ness of the thing unless you actually go through the stage of consciousness such that you can acquire.

An understanding of what was always under your nose the entire time, which you took for granted before.

So, this is a very simple structure of the Garden of Eden.

Adam and Eve did not, they took that garden for granted.

Only when they lost it could they finally appreciate paradise.

And this tripart Trinitarian structure is the same thing here.

When you begin in immediate lack of consciousness, normie, if you're when you're a normie, so this is the dialectic of normie is normie and radicalization, right?

When you're a normie, you don't appreciate what's in front of you, you don't appreciate the concrete whole and totality of existence.

What was the concrete whole according to Marx?

Communism.

Communism is the concrete thing.

The concrete thing is a totalized unity of the division of labor where.

So man depends on others, so others depend upon him.

It's a relationship of reciprocal existence based on labor.

And that's the totality of labor.

Even in feudalism, even in capitalism, even in ancient slave society, in some sense, in a very strict, strictly defined sense, Marxism says there is an objective communism.

It's just that the awareness or appreciation of communism is not institutionalized or acknowledged, but it's still there objectively.

That's why he calls it the riddle of history solved.

So

Um

When you're in the edinic state of Adam and Eve, when you're a normie, you don't appreciate reality.

Yes, it's there in front of you, but you're unable to appreciate it.

You're unable to have gratitude toward it, and therefore you are unable to devote your existence toward it and align your actions with it.

But when you enter the stage of consciousness, you think that you're acquiring something, like it's a plus.

But in reality, it's a negative.

When we became woke during George Floyd, we didn't gain anything.

We lost something.

Namely, our ability to take our reality for granted.

We turned our reality into something that had to be argued about or deducted or concluded through discourse and through consciousness.

When we became woke, you could no longer just watch a movie from 1981 and enjoy it as a naive normie anymore.

Suddenly, you're seeing, oh, this is the racial archetype.

This is the sexist archetype, the patriarchal, racist, colonial structure in this movie.

Like, you lost the ability to just be living in the moment and live in reality.

And you looked at everything through a filter.

Once you acquire consciousness, in some sense, this was a farcical repetition of the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

Because during the Cultural Revolution, for many of the student Red Guards, when you gained the consciousness, you lost something.

Before, maybe you lived an ordinary life and you just took everything for granted.

Once you acquired consciousness, you lost the ability.

To be normal, everything had to be filtered through the lens of the correct ideology.

Everything did, right?

You lost the ability to just be able to, what do they say, enjoy things.

Do you understand?

So that's actually a loss.

You lose something.

That's the stage of the negation.

Okay.

So infrared and the post woke.

That is the negation of the negation.

That's the third term of the dialectic.

That's the sublation.

Now, if you want me to translate this in religious terms and give you my humble opinion on the matter, I think that Judaism is one where, because we're the chosen people, we have a direct communion with God.

We're chosen, okay?

Like, we seamlessly are integrated with God, and even if you're bad, you're still part of this covenant, and that's Judaism, okay?

Christianity is the rupture, Christianity is the negation.

The crucifixion happens, and it's negation.

Now, we have to be awakened to the gospel, okay?

The gospel of Christ.

So, stage two is all about the gospel.

Now, this is my perspective, which I have the right to share.

And I'm full disclosure with you because I'm not playing Takia games with you, okay?

I think Islam is the third term because Islam etymologically means wholeness, okay?

It's like a restoration of wholeness.

Islam is post-gospel.

Islam says, yes, the Holy Spirit, but what is the Holy Spirit?

How do we form a community in relation to the Holy Spirit?

What does that look like decisively?

Right.

Um

So that's a kind of analogy.

Maybe it's helpful to you, maybe it's not.

And maybe you can find a way to subvert this analogy and have a different interpretation of it, which I'm totally open to.

I've never closed myself off to other interpretations.

But whatever you fill the third term with, there is a third term.

Because during the era of the gospel, you also had the rise of Gnosticism, which was a competing trend.

That had to be snuffed out and eradicated.

Gnosticism is woke.

It's the same thing.

It's like it's this profound disjuncture with the everydayness of reality.

It's logos.

In Christianity, what do they say about Christ?

Christ is the logos.

He is the logos.

But logos, as Heraclitus talks about, is.

The dreamer who wakes up and forgets about the dream they just had.

That's Logos.

That's the disjuncture.

That's the metabolic rift between the is and the ought, right?

That's the metabolic rift that creates the possibility of moral agency.

That's why Christianity is the metabolic rift out of which emerges the moral for the first time, right?

Um

What happened to the Marxism is Islam essay?

You may not believe it, but I'm working on it every day.

I'm sitting and thinking about it and working on it.

It's just, you know, I'm getting caught up.

I haven't abandoned it, don't worry.

I'm working on it every day.

Um so

Uh to go to move away from the religious analogy back to what's relevant to us as the American Communist Party and as an infrared.

Infrared is the third, okay?

So that's where that's the place we occupy regarding.

You know, the woke phenomena or leftism or whatever.

And the thing I want you to think about and marinate on and understand.

Is that

We have to unfortunately this is the most excruciatingly difficult thing, but in all my years this is one of the things I had to wise up to, which I did not before 2024.

Had I not wised up to this fact, our unity with Midwestern Marx would not have happened.

And now the unity we have with Midwestern Marks is not just institutional within the ACP.

Like, it's one based on genuine comradeship and I have to say as well, genuine friendship.

Like Eddie and Carlos are actually my friends.

Um

Also Noah as well.

And the friendships and the comradeship between infra-red people and there's no distinction between us.

But had I not wo wisened up to this fact that I'm about to tell you now, that could not have happened.

Um

The thing that I have to tell you about that you need to wise up to is that

Stage two The Conventional Leftism

is just like stage one.

From the perspective of stage three, stage one and stage two are just as misguided.

You don't understand misguided.

Not

Not, you can't ascribe them so much moral agency.

You can't say.

People stuck in Stage Two are necessarily evil or immoral.

You should rather say they're misguided.

But the awkward thing is, in order to guide them and to teach them, you you can't impose some consciousness or theory on them.

What you have to do is convince them to do something

That's more than just at the level of superficial consciousness and discourse, which is genuinely.

Cease.

In some way, it's like cease your let go.

Let go.

Let go of this hang-up inside of you.

Let go of this attachment within you.

Forgive your parents, forgive your family, forgive your fathers.

Move beyond this bitterness and this enmity and this negativity within you.

And genuinely be at peace with what reality is.

Acquire this new perspective that's that allows you to be grateful to the real.

which you never were before.

Be at peace so that you finally have something to fight for, which you don't have right now.

You have nothing to fight for.

You are caught in a fight, but you have nothing to fight for.

You're not a moral agent.

You're a victim.

You're a hapless victim of a contradiction induced inside of your heart, of a cognitive dissonance ripping you inside from within.

But to be a moral agent, you have to have something to fight for, and it's this for thing.

That for all your awakening, for all your consciousness and your wakefulness, you remain blind to.

To surrender to and to accept this thing for which

You must struggle and fight.

You have to let go of the enmity within yourself.

Let go of your bitterness.

Let go of your hatred.

Let go of this conflict inside of you.

Accept and be at peace with the real.

And have a profound gratitude for that.

For the real.

Have a profound gratitude for it.

Be grateful that you have the opportunity.

To live the life that you live, to struggle for what you need to struggle for.

Smile and laugh along the way.

Enjoy it.

Be human.

There's it's not gonna get different from this.

This is where you're at.

You know, you need to overcome this turmoil and agony inside of yourself and just accept.

The profound eloquence and beauty

And yes, harmony of the cosmos.

Everything is the way it is for a reason.

It is.

All that is real is rational.

But you should not make an assumption about what is real, for example.

Why should we say

That the occupation of our nation is real.

Why is it real?

Where's the real power?

Why should we be intimidated by all the weapons, all the force?

All the powers concentrated in the regime.

If you know what's really real.

You realize they're the ones panicking.

They're the ones bitter.

They're the ones who have this conflict, this strife inside of themselves that they have not made peace with, but we have.

And when you make peace,

You make them account for their deficiencies.

You make them come to terms with what they're lacking, but which you have.

Put differently, they're fucking tripping, not you.

You're not fucking tripping, they are.

You're not the fucking crazy one, they are.

You're not the fucking aggressor with a chip on their shoulder, they fucking are.

You want indignation, you want moral indignation, be morally indignant about that.

Be morally indignant about the fact that you and your fellow man and your fellow woman just want to live normal lives.

Human lives of human dignity.

And that for this crime, the aggressors have declared war on you.

Be indignant about that fact.

Be indignant in the same way a lion is indignant about a fucking tick.

That has jumped on it.

You just shake that shit off.

Don't fucking let it get to you.

Don't let it eat you away internally.

You're a fucking lion.

Why the fuck are you gonna let this small thing?

Corrupt your soul.

Just get rid of it.

And move on.

You know, people can't move on.

When they're stuck in a state of consciousness, when I defeat my enemies, I move the fuck on.

But when someone's stuck in a state of consciousness,

Ever is is allowed to defeat their enemy, it's not enough.

They have to torture.

They have to take more and more and more because to torture someone means I'm not satisfied with removing this obstacle.

I want to make them suffer because I'm suffering.

But the suffering that's inside of you is the problem.

You understand?

The suffering inside of you incriminates you.

Why are you suffering inside?

Why are you still suffering inside of you?

Whatever, if you don't have the profound faith that the thing that eats inside of you, that you can be, you can solve that problem, you could be at peace with it.

We all wage an energy hot, but you wanna know why I'm fucking smiling and laughing ninety nine percent of the fucking time when you meet me in person?

Because I really do think when all is said and done, we got this shit.

We will prevail.

We will find a fucking way.

And no, we're not going to find a way by holding society hostage as leftists think.

They think that the only way I'm going to confront this suffering inside myself is by forcing all of society to speak in the way that I want them to speak to me, to change their pronoun, whatever, to change how they treat me or to change how society is structured.

That's not going to solve the contradiction inside of you.

You don't even know what you're fighting for if that's what you're fighting for.

You're not a communist fighting to transform the world.

You're deflecting responsibility to confront your own suffering and your own internal issues and holding society hostage.

But it's not society's problem, it's yours.

You know, even when you're victimized by this society, let's say you're an innocent man thrown in jail.

Those people have more anger than anyone.

But you know what?

At a certain point, they understand the truth.

Just the way it fucking is.

Nobody, it's not society's problem, it's my fucking problem.

Then a lion.

Someone who's achieved the third stage of development says, Why are we allowing this to happen to that person?

This is unjust.

Why are we committing this injustice and this aggression against an innocent person?

Who is going to bring justice?

The second person or someone who's angry and has a grudge against society?

No.

You're angry and you have a grudge.

You're fighting yourself.

The only way we can overcome the evil within ourselves is to fight for others.

Fight on behalf of others.

Fight to bring justice to others.

You alone can bring justice to yourself.

But you want to know what you can fucking do?

You can stand up for other people.

You can stand up for people who are not you.

You can stand up for yourself.

But others

Wherever you can to stand up for them, do you wanna know why?

Because it's true.

It's true.

People do need to stand up for you.

It is true.

But you can't wait for them to do that.

You have to stand up for yourself.

Unfortunately, that's the truth.

You can't be resentful for people not doing that.

But at the same time

If if society don does you dirty, you're victimized.

You die and you martyr yourself and you fucking go to heaven or whatever.

It's like.

You actually are at peace.

We are the ones that have to live with that evil.

We have to live with that.

We have to live.

With that wickedness and with that evil.

When you're fucking gone and you're it's just over GG for you, you're gone.

You're not a victim anymore.

You're gone.

We have to live with it.

You have when you when our society is committing against injustice against other people, you have to live with that, not them.

When you know if they're gone, they're gone, right?

You have to live with it.

And so if you have to live with it, what does it mean?

You have to make it your duty to stand up for other people.

Even though it seems like a contradiction, I tell you on the one hand to stand up for yourself and don't wait for anyone.

And then simultaneously I say, you have to after the reaching the third stage, stand up for other people.

Why is that?

Well, it's very simple.

It's actually so profoundly simple.

Learn from Jesus who gracefully accepted his fate.

People they don't understand the wisdom, the profound meaning of that.

They have no fucking idea what it means.

They think somehow it means you should be a pacifist and you should never fight back or defend yourself.

That's not what it means.

It means in a sense that

I did my part as much as I could, but I was failed.

And there's and I resign.

There's nothing I can do.

I did my part.

If I scream and complain at others for not attending to me enough, it's like.

Why should I sacrifice my gratitude, my inner peace, because other people never ever betray your peace within yourself.

Ever betray the peace within yourself.

But when you stand up for other people, you are doing right by something.

You are doing right by something more than yourself.

So you're at peace with yourself and you're at peace with the world.

But to be at peace with communism, to be at peace with the cosmos, the microcosmos that we call society, to be at peace with the social microcosmos, the ummah.

You have to do right by it.

And this doing right is not a cost.

It's not an extension of some eternal cognitive dissonance that you're throwing onto the world.

It's as seamless as a lion descending upon their prey.

Yes, it's furious.

Yes, it's ferocious.

But it's just what you fucking do when you have your shit together.

It's just what you fucking do.

Because that shit is yours.

And you're part of it.

And it's part of what you are.

Peace doesn't mean passivity.

Do you understand?

Do you understand what I'm saying?

Peace doesn't mean you're passive.

Peace means you fucking got that shit locked in and you understand your place in everything and the place of everything in you.

That's why Jesus accepted his fate.

But then he also said, I've come here with the sword.

Why did he say that?

He didn't accept his fate because he was a pacifist.

He accepted his fate because he was at peace with it.

It didn't bother him existentially inside of him.

He didn't let that demoralize and crush him.

He didn't let that kill his spirit.

Do you understand?

You don't let it get to you.

You don't let it shake your faith.

You patiently resign yourself.

Never let k the way that the enemy wins is not by annihilating you physically.

The way the enemy wins is crushing your spirit.

That's how demons win.

They don't win by a demon doesn't win by coming and fucking slapping your face and bitch slapping you.

A demon wins when they fucking get to you.

When they get in your fucking head and they crush your spirit, they break your morale.

They break your spirit.

They fucking make you blackpill and give the fuck up.

So

We're talking about a tripart stage in the development of the Americ psyche or the soul or the subject, you know?

And woke is the second stage of the negation, and we're the third stage.

And by the way, anti-woke is still in the second stage.

Anyone who's anti-woke is in the second stage, because you have to think about it.

Don't the anti-trans people have trans derangement syndrome?

Like they're always talking about transgenders and shit.

That's still stage two.

That's the same thing as a transgender who's obsessed with transgenderism.

It's the same derangement.

But both of them want to trick us and deny that stage three is possible.

And that's the fucking problem.

Stage three is possible.

You can transcend consciousness itself.

And let's go full circle and how the fuck did I get how the fuck did I even get here, right?

Well, the way that I fucking got here in the first place

was through something simple.

When we're looking at the D S A people and the progressive left.

It does piss us off and anger us.

Because we think that they're moral agents on the same plane as us, but the truth is

They're in stage two, and we're in stage three.

So, if we're going to be patient with the masses in stage one,

You also need to be patient with the masses in Stage Two.

Because Stage Two is just as uh a passive amoral thing as Stage One.

Like, you don't get angry at normies for eating hot dogs, do you?

So why would you get angry at a DSA Marxist for screaming about pronouns and

Jibber buzzword salads.

When they're calling you a Nasbull and shit, it's like you need to understand when they call you a Nasbull.

And they call you a racist and a sexist and all this kind of stuff.

It's like.

That's just like a normie eating a hot dog during a genocide.

It's like, well, that that's just they're not.

Developed enough.

Instead of like letting it get to you, how can you let it get to you?

That clearly there's been a jump and a leap you've made that they're afraid of making.

Do you understand that at least?

This is not a theoretical disagreement.

This is not a polemical ideological disagreement.

This disagreement is separated by a a vast chasm.

Within the soul.

And that's why when people take the infrared pill, they take the whole thing.

How often do we need part by part?

to ma i i i to i you know get infrared people to buy into like all of our wacky world view thi.

Whenever someone takes the infrared pill, they take the whole fucking thing all at once 'cause it all becomes clear to them.

If only like nobody gets persuaded by these debates that you have, which you should still have to assert our discursive hegemony and create the pressure, because this needs pressure, right?

But when people take the infra pill, it's like this.

The whole everything makes sense at once.

Simultaneously, everything makes sense all at once, right?

And we need to think about how do we give people more of those infra pills?

How do we induce people with more of that?

How do we get people to understand that better?

Like the stage, there's so many different stages of consciousness, but our stage transcends consciousness itself.

Captain, what's up?

Appreciate you, man.

It's like, you know, when I see people being, infrared's opportunist, first you made this meme about MAGA, then you're making all these other memes, and you're just changing your positions.

And I'm like, stage two, you're on stage two.

You don't understand.

When you're on stage three, you've transcended consciousness.

You know what?

Stage.

Okay, I'm going to give you another word for stage three.

Stage three are people who look at the information space as a battle space in the abstract and in general.

You no longer see it as.

The s the battlefield for your own soul.

You see it as an information battle space just like a military would see it.

The same way a military treats information space, that's what stage three consciousness treats it as.

When you're a military, you're not thinking about information space in a personal way.

You're not attaching your morale and ideology, strictly reducing that.

Be like, I thought MAGA communism was your ideology.

In other words, a lot of people think or deluded to themselves.

You know how they say if you're a 3D.

perspective, you cannot see in 4D.

If you're a two-dimensional being, three D makes no sense to you.

There's no way for you to see in 3D.

Everything will be looking 2D to you.

Even 3D phenomena will look 2D to you.

And the same thing for 4D space, if you know that analogy, right?

It's the same thing with these stages.

People who saw MAGA communism, who were stuck in stage two consciousness, they were like so this is your soul and your ideology and like it's like no, I this is bait for you and I'm fishing on a boat and you're a fucking goldfish.

Like you can't even see the boat.

You can't see the third stage 'cause you've never achieved it.

I'm here up here.

You my whole life and soul is not here.

This is mega-communism is not my religion.

But it looks like a religion to you because that's the only way you know how to interface with memes, is creating idols.

Well, I use memes to communicate a stage three level of

Subjectivity

That is not reducible to the thi like

Like for example

If you are an octopus and you have a tentacle.

Ah a pier up from the ocean.

Is all you are the tentacle?

No, but if I'm looking at you from a boat.

It seems that way that you're just this tentacle.

But that's because I can't see the octopus.

Same thing with MAGA communism.

There's this big infrared globe, this orb.

There's this infra orb, this orb, okay?

This profound stage 3 Sufi enlightenment, this black enlightenment.

That's what the infrared globe is, the luminous black.

It's the black enlightenment, right?

And it's like the head of the octopus.

And it's like MAGA communism was one tentacle.

And then there's another tentacle.

And there's all these different tentacles.

And it's like everyone's trying to shoot the tentacle because they don't understand and they can't perceive the head because they literally are unable to actually.

Like they're not even in a stage of consciousness where they're capable of comprehending it.

They're stuck in a stage two level where all they can see are the effects.

They can't see like the source, right?

And that's the analogy really.

That's really the analogy.

It's like they don't understand the root source type of world view and outlook that this is all coming from because that requires crossing a metabolic rift from premoral

Accidental consciousness to true moral agency and moral alignment with the cosmos, right?

Microcosmic moral alignment.

Is only possible through the Sufi stage of luminous black of the annihilation of the self.

And if you can't reach that stage

You you don't know what comes beyond that stage, you can't even see beyond it.

You just see a black void.

But what's beyond the stage of luminous black?

Does anyone know?

Green.

The Emerald Mountain.

Yellowstone Caledra.

My vision for the story of infrared is a geosophical odyssey, okay?

Where the stages of the development of enlightenment through the Sufi illuminationist school, which Infrared is really drawing from in a lot of ways,

Is literally reflected geographically as a long march to Yellowstone, and that's the Emerald Mountain.

To get to Yellowstone, we have to get through all of these stages, okay?

Hit Kiladi.

What's up?

We have to reach Yellowstone.

Okay, in order to reach Yellowstone, we have to pass through the Rockies, we have to pass through all these different

Like we have to take the geosophy of America and break that down into an initiatic stage of spiritual development for the nation and for our party and for our movement and for ourselves.

And uh

Why is Yellowstone the end goal?

I don't fully know, but I well, I do kinda know.

I'll tell you why, okay.

You know what's interesting?

I am a guy who loves analogies and I love literature, but I will look you dead in the eye and I'll tell you this is not.

A metaphor.

This is like literal.

Because it should be literal.

But Yellowstone, what Yellowstone basically means is the entrance into the American unconscious.

That's what Yellowstone means.

Yellowstone is an entrance into the subterrestrial reality within this country of the people.

It's the subterrestrial reality of the American people.

And I can get into the

The esoteric nature of the people itself if you want as well.

If you would like that, you know, hit Kaladi just dropped a five, so you guys have earned it, I think.

So, the mystical significance of the people is: is the people a sum total of different no, the people basically means that there's an inceptual principle of human existence.

Okay, the Sufis would call this Al-Insan al-Kamil.

Okay, Al-Insan al-Kamil.

is logos translated in the Islamic and Sufi mystical tradition.

Al Islan sorry, Alinsan al-Kamil means the perfect man, okay?

The perfect man is the archetypal primordial man, the the inceptual principle of what man is, right?

Al-Insan al-Kamil is basically like materially, what is humanity?

Well, that's it.

It's like, if you want to think about it to simplify it and dumb it down, think of it as the platonic form of man, although that's not what it is.

But think of it that way if you need to.

Okay?

So the idea is that Al-Insan al-Kamil is an isth-isthmus.

Okay, I can't say isth-istmus.

It's like a passage between two worlds, heaven and earth, right?

So that's kind of like an analogy for the spiritual and the immediate and the carnal.

What they would call the material, but that's a problematic word, right?

Material.

The isthmus, okay?

And man is this mediation between

The spiritual realm, the realm of the infinite, the eternal, whatever, the transcendent, and the immediate, the earthly, the material, or something, right?

And that is kind of the definition they give of man, right?

That this is the perfect, but the perfect man is like the perfect essence of what man is.

It's kind of like an archetype of man, right?

Okay.

So um

This is identified with Logos, okay?

So because Logos is also this mediative factor, according to Heraclitus and according to the philosophical tradition that the Sufis are drawing from, which is definitely tracing through the Greco-Roman tradition, but incorporates the Persian as well, of course.

Definitely, Logos is also a kind of isthmus, even for Heraclitus, right?

Because what Logos is mediating.

is on the one hand a world of infinite becoming and on the other hand a world of d determinate things, objects of the understanding as Hegel would call them.

Okay?

So in any case, logos is also this medi is the thing that mediates, okay, the infinite and the eternal, and the, on the other hand, the, you know, the fleeting and the temporal.

Okay?

So, um

Uh let's continue, okay.

So Alinsan Al Camille.

Is

The inceptual principle of humanity.

Okay.

But what is that thing?

Like, what is it?

Well, long story short, it's not a physical body.

There's no single person where you could point to them and say, that is.

Some say the prophet of Islam is Al-Insan al-Kamil, the perfect man.

But.

In in a literal sense, you cannot reduce the Sufi notion of the perfect man to an individual human body, okay?

So if you are familiar with the Feuerbachian tradition of humanism, you will find interesting resonances with the Sufi notion of man from Feuerbach, right?

Gerald.

Because Feuerbachian man is a pre-individuated kind of

Um

Non-reducible, non-tangible, quasi-substance/slash essence, the word that Feuerbach and Marx used was the species being, which was an ontological notion of a of being that is self-relating, that has the capacity for self-relation, right?

And therefore particularity and determination.

And in any case, Al-Insan al-Kamil is the human.

Okay.

Well, the human is not just an individual body or an organism like an animal.

The human is a relation, it's a relationality.

So recall how the Sufis refer to man as the ithmus between heaven and earth, right?

That denotes a relationship.

That mediative factor is responsible for the social nature of man.

In order to achieve parity with Al-Insan al-Kamil, here's the communistic interpretation, which is very easy if you're familiar with both Sufism and Marx and Feuerbach.

Al-Insan al-Kamil is only real through the concrete totality of all human relations.

So if you take a society,

On the one hand, you have particular human beings with their own skills and talents and crafts and experiences and knowledge.

But if I take a butcher from a butcher shop or a baker, and imagine it's like a fat guy with an apron, I take that guy.

And I say, this is Alin San Al-Kamil.

What I'm saying is, this is the essence of man.

This is what exhausts everything that man is.

That's not true.

That's not true.

Why?

Because the totality of human potential is only something we could even think about when we consider society as a whole.

When we consider the fact that, well, an attribute of man is that they can be bakers, but man can also be a ballerina, or man can also be a philosopher, or a rocket scientist, or a homeless guy, or X, Y, and Z, whatever.

So there's a full breadth of human in order to know what man is and to define the man, Al-Insan al-Kamil, okay?

In order to define that, you need a lot of data, so to speak, right?

You need fucking Java piece of shit.

Sorry.

In order to have that

You need to have a lot of data, okay, that's available.

So

Um, can you ever reach the concrete totality and say, I've exhausted every possible permutation of what man could possibly be?

No.

You can't do that.

Because it's like you can only infinitesimally approximate.

If you were to somehow take everyone in the world right now and say all 8 billion human beings.

You can you will infinitesimally approximate every possible permutation of what a human being is.

But there's still going to be things that are missing due to chance and due to the time at which you froze.

Because remember, temporality and history are part of this.

There's things that were characteristic of what man was 500 years ago that's no longer true today.

Well, yesterday there's things characteristic of the entire wealth of man that are no longer true anymore.

Because what, about 10,000 people at least died?

Every single day, there's a specific amount of people that die, right?

Well, since every single person is unique because they are,

That means that when you isolate and freeze, when you say all 8 billion people right now, that's Al-Insan al-Kamil, right?

You're still getting only an infinitesimal approximation.

You're not getting a totality because you're abstracting still, because you're freezing in time.

What does abstract mean, class?

Pay attention to me carefully, class.

To abstract means to abstract from the concrete whole, the totality.

Well, when you take something at a particular point in time, you're also abstracting.

Because a feature of the concrete is, it's that it's suspended in a temporal process, is it not?

Something that's eternal, for example.

Uh if you were to say this is what it is now.

Well, you're abstracting.

Because you're taking it at a particular point in time.

Okay, for example, if I say.

Gulag Grog.

Let's say Gulag Grog from my chat.

I take Gulag Grog.

This is Gulag Grog.

I am abstracting when I do that.

Because Gulag Grag is a person with a lifespan of maybe a hundred years.

You know, inshallah, they live a great life.

When I isolate them at one point in time, I'm abstracting them from their life.

I can't reduce a person to what they are at one point in time.

That's abstracting.

You understand?

So it would also be true for if I were to say all 8 billion people in the world are Al-Insan al-Kamil, that's also an abstraction because time is a factor in the concrete as well.

So, why am I saying this?

It's still an infinitesimal approximation, but Al-Insan al-Kamil is more than the sum total of all people on earth.

Even more, not less.

You don't understand how I'm reversing and twisting the logic for you.

According to ordinary Anglo-logic, when you say all of America, the American people, you're abstracting, because only concrete individuals exist.

I'm saying something different.

The Sufis were saying something different.

No.

Alin San Al Camil, the perfect man.

Is more than the aggregate totality of all the population.

That is inadequate with respect to what it is.

You understand?

It's the opposite of what your conventional logic would lead you to conclude.

Okay?

So

Where does that bring the people?

Well, when we say the people, we're saying something.

Very powerful when we use the signifier the people.

Okay, what we're communicating is not just we're saying Alensan al-Kamiyo, we're saying at our concrete reality right now, our relationship to the species being to the Gatung Wesan or Alensan al-Kamiol.

Is obviously inadequate, but we are defined by that relationship, and that is the people.

The people is an undefined set.

And the reason it's a plur it's a plurality.

It's a plural.

Is because it is all the different ways in which we are not Alin San Al-Kamil.

That plurality, that incompleted totality, the non-all is what Lacan would call it, that is what we are.

That is how we can refer to ourselves politically and so on, civilizationally.

When we say the people, we're not saying Alinsan al-Kamil, we're saying

All the ways in which

We are not that directly.

And therefore that we are that.

That we are not Alan Alan San Al Kamil means we are.

Precisely in the way that we are not, we are.

It's a plurality.

It's a plurality as an act of mercy, in a way, when we say the people, it's a mercy.

Why?

Because we're saying the people all the people who live in the light and in relation to the essence of Gatungz Wesen or Alinsan al-Kamil.

All of them, the people, that that is what they are.

Not, you know, jim plus Bob plus Deborah plus Bernie plus Jimmy plus Tim plus Tom plus Barbara or something.

Mm-hmm.

This s this

Indefinite relationship.

To the essence of the species.

as it finds concrete expression in the world.

When people say the problem with the people is it's not being defined, and I'm like, but the people is.

How we refer to

The essence we have in common.

We do share an essence.

And if you don't believe we share an essence,

um then you don't think hum humanity is real.

You just think that y y you're you're lying.

By communicating and using language you're presupposing the idea we share in essence.

Otherwise, precisely what is it you mean to communicate?

I would rank this stream as among the top ten most important lectures of the entire year.

And it's unfortunate because only a handful of the initiated will understand and appreciate it.

Ty Kim, ask your question.

You have one chance.

Even though you're not subbed.

Are you Russian?

That's that's the stage.

This guy is stage one consciousness.

That's stage one consciousness for you.

That's stage one.

Okay, now you guys love.

I gave you some new tools to refer to your reality in a practical way.

Like, whenever somebody screams at you about bigotry, it's like that's stage two consciousness for sure.

That person right there is stage one for sure.

Stage one consciousness.

For sure stage one consciousness.

All of our ops are obviously stage two.

But uh that's for sure Stage One consciousness.

Guys, what is it?

Am I Russian or am I brown?

That's the thing I never understood.

Am I Russian or am I brown?

You know why Richard Spencer never talks about our debate?

Dane, what's up?

Thank you, man.

The reason Richard Spencer never talks about our debate is because

He fucked up his racial

Perceptiveness badly, and it would discredit him if more attention was brought on the fact that he thought I was Russian.

He just assumed in that debate I was Russian.

He was like, Your people.

So he made it impossible to call me Brown.

How can you call me Brown if you thought I was Russian?

He made it impossible to like racially categorize me properly.

Because if he wants to be adversarial toward me, of course he would want to reach for the thing of oh, this is some brown guy.

But wait a second, you thought I was Russian based on how I looked.

So something is wrong with your racial perceptiveness.

But if you uh go to Lebanon and if you travel to Lebanon, a whole lot of people look like me.

Like when I was I was talking to Jackson about this, when I was in London for a connection flight.

And I went into the terminal or the the whatever you call it.

The place where we're gonna board the airplane.

And when I went there and I saw everyone sitting down.

Just a bunch of dudes who looked like me.

And I was like, you know what it feels like, Jackson?

I was messaging Jackson.

I was like, remember that episode of SpongeBob?

Where Squidward finds these like the tribe of like Squidward people who look like him, like exactly as he does.

And he's like, wow, this is like that's what it felt like, you know?

Because everywhere I go in the world

People don't know what I am ethnically.

But Lebanon is such a small country.

I actually do look Lebanese, by the way.

I look very Lebanese.

But it's Lebanon is so small and insignificant in the world that it's hard, you know, most people will not guess that correctly.

But when you go to Lebanon itself, it's like wow, everyone looks just like me

Just different variations of me but if you go there and see for yourself, I look very Lebanese.

Your southern Italian

I'm gonna be honest.

If you're Southern Italian, I'm whiter than you are.

I'm whiter than you are.

If you're Southern Italian, nah, if you're Sicilian.

If you're Sicilian, I'm whiter than you are, for sure.

Southern Italian is probably not, but if you're Sicilian, for sure.

If you're Sicilian, for sure I am whiter than you.

I did a lot of research, and it turns out most white phenotypes are a combination and a mixture between Nordics and Iranic people.

And the Nordics actually come from the Finno Ungaric, whatever.

If you look at some Scandinavians up north, especially when they're rule, and you look them in the face.

And they may have blue eyes and blonde hair and all that stuff.

Those do not look like the archetype of a European.

They look clearly somehow related to Asians, some way.

They definitely, yeah, they look Finno Ugric.

If you go north and white enough, they don't even look white anymore, you know?

So, what we call white is actually a mixture between that group.

The Neolithic farmers

Um, who you know, basically Neolithic farmer population is something that's common in the Middle East and Anatolia as well, Turkey.

But then the third thing is usually Iranic peoples.

So I learned something I didn't necessarily know.

Did you know that 50% of the Germanic barbaric invasions into the Roman Empire, into Western Europe, settling into Western Europe, 50% of the people that we call the Goths and the Visigoths and the Germanics, 50% of them were Alans.

Alans were an Iranic Iranian uh group.

who came from the Caucasus.

And fifty percent of the people who migrated to Europe during that time were Alans.

And that's why sometimes when you look at Germans

And some white people, like s French or Germans, sometimes when you look at them, they look like they're Middle Eastern.

For example, Christian in our party, Darg,

Does not look white, but he is he is German Amish on both sides for generations, like since before 76.

But he looks like everyone thinks he's Middle Eastern to the point where he told me a story when he was driving at a gas station.

Some guy came up to him and he goes, Assalamu alaikum, you want to buy some AirPods to a guy whose both parents are German for generations.

Not Bavarians, Amish, okay?

So he's not Bavarian.

Um

And then of course you that French far right guy who went to uh

Who went to um

Russia and was walking around Red Square, and then people just ran like, Oh, Asalaamu Alaikum.

They thought he was an Arab.

Well, the truth is that the European race is not real.

Okay, it's a mixture of the groups I just mentioned, and it's not a real thing.

It's not, it's just um.

It's not a unified phenotype per se.

When you say someone is European.

Or looks European

Um that can mean a lot of different things, you know?

Wh where does a white person and a brown person begin?

It's very difficult to understand that because, for example, Spain and Portugal and France, southern France,

And the people say well, it's just about the UK and the Anglos and no.

No, it's not, because you have so many British actors

And British people who look Middle Eastern.

They look like

Remember that guy in in Iraq, Tariq Aziz?

Was that his name?

Who was just like a ginger?

Like, that's what Middle Eastern people look like oftentimes.

No, not Tariq Aziz.

Who is the ginger?

Fuck, what was his name?

Yeah, Izzat Ibrahim al Duri.

Like, is this guy

Like, how would you know that this guy's name is Isat Ibrahim Alduri?

Could you tell?

Isat Ibrahim Alduri, or is this Thomas Beckingham?

How could you know?

Like, how could you tell?

You know, you can't.

So that's why I'm saying that's why the reason I'm I'm saying these things is because the new animus about Islam is not racial.

It's not a racial thing.

It's something deeper than even race.

Which is which makes it even scarier when you think about it.

It's not a racial thing because especially in Dearborn, Middle Eastern immigrants do not look so profoundly different racially to white people, right?

Uh there obviously, I mean, yeah, there's something about it.

I mean, it's like a

New Jersey Italians, I guess.

Nothing just so dramatic though, right, that would warrant or justify this being a because there's a lot of people who will a lot of right wingers who will come to me and say, Well, Haas,

This is about different racial tribes and conquest.

You know, it's a it's a competition of genes.

And we're fighting over land and resources and and and s stop the LARP.

It has nothing to do with that because you are not as s nearly as sensitive to other more profoundly racially distant groups who invade America.

Uh this one bothers you more because of religion or something, but definitely not race.

Uh so um that's what people should think about.

I want to check if Jesus Motorcycle up uploaded this thing to YouTube, or he definitely did to X, so I wanna show you something he made that I liked.

Speaking of this whole thing.

And it's just like it's the slop Nikita Beer, Nikita Bear of the X algorithm.

Talk about a fucking hideous, ugly disaster fucking destroying the X algorithm.

You look at Nikita Beer and he looks like the most corrupted, deformed, demented being you can imagine.

And I look at Nikita Bear, and I know that's why X is all fucked up because you made the algorithm look like your face.

For sure, he did.

I'm not going to elaborate or explain what that means, but if you're on X, you understand the slop.

Low quality trash algorithm that we have looks like it was made by the person who made it, which was Nikita Beer.

Uh Jake Shields reaction to the Stalin Post.

What Stalin Post?

So this is a Shakers version of Allah Cosmos Xi Jinping, but in the style of a Shaker's hymn.

Which is pleasant and nice and cool, but it w it it doesn't have the same meme value for going hard that the original did.

That's why I I'm gonna show you guys this video and I'm gonna ask you guys to do something.

If you can, think about making like schizo edits of this.

Like make this Nasheed.

Into something that's like hype, like hard style.

Like, you know, those like schizo edits you see on TikTok.

Make this like a cool hype edit, schizo edit with the visuals.

I'm gonna show you.

This has really cool visuals you could use.

I held a day so long expected.

I held it.

Sion's walls are now subjected to the fire that knows no peace.

Throughout Shiloh's wide dominion, Hear the trumpet loudly roar.

All and the cosmos, cosmos, cosmos, all under the cosmos.

This just goes so hard.

Like, I'm not.

I don't know if I would say I'm not a.

I don't really wear the cross or identify it, but this part goes so fucking hard.

This goes so hard.

Like, this gave me goosebumps.

The merry part, like, this part goes hard as fuck.

Like, that's such a cool fucking scene.

I'm not going to lie.

Allah and the cosmos, cosmos, cosmos, Allah and the cosmos, deep in pain.

All her bankers stand in wonder, What is this that comes to pass?

Murmuring like the distant thunder, and crying out alas, alas.

Swell the sounding kings and nobles, what not wrought has come to pass.

This shit goes hard as fuck.

Especially the musical drop at this part.

See, that's what I've been saying about our visuals.

We need red, red, red, red, red, right?

So this is like fully.

Up to par with that.

Like, we the more the flooding sea of red.

That's so fucking based.

That is so cool.

That is so cool.

And this only gets 150 likes, you know?

I knew it would not do good on the algorithm, unfortunately.

But for our community this is so good, you know.

This is this goes so hard.

And this will go hard in the future.

This will go more viral in the future too.

When the proper context is established.

But uh I just love this part so much.

I lo I like this part a lot because it's like America is this is the story of Jesus.

This is what it's about.

It's this is what it's about.

It's like

If I was a Sufi mystic who came to this land from 500 years ago, I would say this is the land of Jesus.

This is a Jesus land.

And this Jesus is the prophet that people relate to most here and makes the most sense to people because cosmologically the prophet Jesus in this land is this this is part of the story this is part of the puzzle like this is a key thing you know

And that's why I fully accept

Christianity being the dominant thing in America, in a way, because it's like this is.

Uh

This is like it's not

It's not defective to be so strongly emphasizing that, you know?

Um

Jesus represents something very profound, very, very profound, very critical and important within the Islamic eschatology that should not be overlooked.

And I gave you my take before, which I fully stand by, which is that.

The Protestant Reformation participates in

The rise of

Real Islam, you know?

Not the abstract Islam, but the concrete Islam.

So there's an abstract Islam which culminates in Saudi Arabia, but the concrete Islam goes through different vectors of development.

You know, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane,

The rise of the Safavids.

The gunpowder empires and the Protestant Reformation, you know?

And then concrete Islam is my word for communism.

Like, I want to show you something that CNN.

I mean, when I tell you guys some sh the shit that's happening is fucking crazy and we're sleeping on it.

What's going on on CNN?

This AI thing

This is so based.

This is so based.

Oh my god, I'm soing out.

This is so based.

This is so based.

Single authoritarian party.

All prices set by the government.

All services state-owned.

No individual land ownership.

Hell yeah.

No individual land ownership.

Everything is owned by the con, everything is owned by the dynasty.

Asiatic mode of production.

Nothing is owned by the individual.

The Dynasty!

Owns everything, the Sultan owns everything.

This is the Asiatic Mode of Production, absolutely fucking based.

No economic incentive.

Everyone is equal before the con.

That is based as fuck.

Like, in principle, that's so fucking cool.

Like, no individual land ownership.

No individual land ownership.

Everyone.

Is aligned with the dynasty.

No individual land ownership.

Kublai Khan owns everything.

Fucking bats as fuck.

We are all equal before Kublai Khan.

No individual land ownership.

So fucking based.

So fucking based.

You know, I'm going to give you a forbidden pill.

You're not, nobody's ready for this shit.

The forbidden pill is like.

If you live in a society that goes hard as fuck, there's no private property.

You can't why?

Who the fuck's gonna I own this, shut the fuck up?

You don't get it.

You either get it or you don't get it.

Like, you live in a society that goes hard as fuck.

It's like there's no private property.

Cause all you need is honor.

Fuck, you need to just take some shit for it.

It's honor.

My word, my honor.

That's my dignity.

Fuck, I need to own.

I'm gonna carve something out and say that's mine.

No, what you are is what's you in your chest.

That's what you are.

Some shit that goes hard as fuck, you need some bitch ass eunuch.

I'm going to just say some crazy ass shit.

Private property is low testosterone.

Private property is 100% low testosterone.

And you know who talks about this?

I'm not even fucking kidding.

May Allah like I'm not kidding.

I'm it's not a meme.

Frederick Engels literally claims that private property is low testosterone and soy.

Look at how Engels describes the Gentile society.

Engels gave vivid descriptions of what he called Gentile society, primitive communism.

And he's like, they were athletic, vigorous, strong.

Like, he literally gives very detailed descriptions of like a higher state of masculinity.

Go read it yourself.

He literally said that.

Engels said that.

He said, private property is low testosterone.

Uh the fine don't worry, the finding fathers were m Islamic.

They're Muslim, specifically Shia.

Specifically, uh Iranian Shia, founding fathers of America, they were Iranian.

Z uh Shia.

Safavicia lineage.

You know, I connect the American Civil War with

The Qizil Bash and the sh you know story of Safavid Iran so much because

The American Civil War is the fitna.

It's the internal jihad within Islam, the fight for the soul of Islam.

Why?

Because the United States is the abstract universal, which Hegel identifies with Islam.

It's the universal.

United States.

It's the one.

The one.

One e pluribus unum, one nation under God.

That's like the motto of the nation, e pluribus unum, right?

So it's about the one.

It's about the founding fathers were deists.

They were basically Muslims, you know, without all the rituals.

They were deists.

Um.

Just like Robespierre, who was a Muslim but he didn't know it.

And uh Abraham Lincoln was a Shia because this American Civil War was the fitna.

It was about the internal struggle within Islam.

So I'm dropping some crazy ass shit most people are not ready for.

I'm dropping crazy ass shit people aren't ready for it, you know, but it's okay.

My uh you know what I want?

I want to make a community of people who are not of Muslim descent comfortable with taking and appropriating and

Uh

You know, like feeling not alienated, you know, just like you can also be part of the Islamicate world.

Why not?

They'll say, oh, it's cultural appropriation.

Who gives a fuck?

Why should you treat this as something strange and foreign and alien, rather than something that you can somehow relate to, you know?

And it it's the same thing, and that's what I would like to do.

Yeah.

What about Christology?

So, I need you to understand something.

You are, you're like on stage two.

If this is.

People who are fixated on the reality that Christianity is deeper than Reddit taught you, you're still on stage two consciousness.

Okay?

Because.

You need to consult the Christian esoteric tradition.

Okay, the Christian esoteric tradition within Western Europe.

including uh Master Eckhart and all these other kinds of

Uh founder of the Rosicurians, forgot his name, and so on and so on.

Johannes Bum and uh

Fuck, who's the guy that d directly influences Hegel from the Hermetic tradition?

You need to, like, actually, like, learn about that shit.

Because when you're just, like,

When you're just doing this cookie cutter stage two version of Christianity, you're doing a disservice to the actual proper Western esoteric tradition, which actually goes farther than much farther than than what you're talking about, right?

Jacob Bo Bohum, yeah, Jacob Bohm, whatever.

I mean, even Thomas Munzer was a profound thinker, you know.

Thomas Munzer was onto some crazy shit.

So it's much deeper than surface level

Christianity, you know.

Fan fiction of the holy book.

What do you mean?

They uh defiled and made fanfiction of the holy book, but the deletion of entire passages.

I'm not familiar with that.

Oh, the Jefferson Bible, I'm not familiar with that.

Not familiar with that at all.

He edited out every miracle in the Bible.

That's so ridiculous.

It's like a stereotypical

Classical Enlightenment thing to do

Um no no no no.

He's in pain.

Tartaria Arlent Tartaria.

Mountain home They called you Yellowstone

Mm-hmm.

Mm-hmm.

Game.

Alright, guys, I will see you tomorrow.

I'm going live tomorrow, so keep that in mind.

I'll be live tomorrow.

Okay?

So be there or be square.

Bye-bye.