🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

Don't stop, baby, you can walk through.

Oh, I'm everything about you.

You know that I'm never gonna do. Don't check on with the unambusha or not some. Sometimes all I think about his own

Sometimes all I think about his you Play nights in the middle of June

He waves been fecking me out

Can't make you happier now

Sometimes I think about his you

Late nights in the middle of June

He waves been fecking me out

Can't make you happy to now

Usually I put something on TV

So we never think about you and me

But today I see our reflections clearly in Hollywood laying on the screen

You just need a better life in this

You need something I can never give

They got out all across the road

It's gone now the night is calm but

Sometimes all I think about is you

Bang nights in the middle of June

He waves been freaking me out

Can't make you happy on now

You can't fight it you can can't breathe. You say something so loving, but now I gotta let you go.

You'll be better off than someone new.

I don't wanna be alone. You know it hurts me too.

You look so broken when you cry.

One more and then I say goodbye.

Sometimes I think about his you.

Bad nights in the middle of June.

Eways been faking me out.

Can't make you happy or now.

Sometimes all I think about is you

late nights in the middle of June He waves been freaking me out.

Can't make you happy or now.

I just wonder what you're dreaming of

When you're sleeping, smile so comfortable.

I just wish that I could give you that. That look that's perfectly

unsaid. Sometimes all I think who was you. Late nights in the middle of June. He wears

been faking me out. He has been ficking me out Heways been flicking me out

Sometimes I think about is you

May nights in the middle of June

He ways been icking me out.

Can't make you happy, oh, now.

Sometimes all I think about his you

late nights in the middle of June.

Eways been thicken me out. can't make you happy all now. I don't know how to try and that makes it. Let me say you, let me say you, let the ornuckle flow.

Let me reach, let me beach on the shores of Tripoli.

Let me sail, let me sail, let me crash on your ship.

Let me reach, let me reach, to be each far beyond the air to see you.

Stay the way, stay the way, stay the way.

Stay the way, stay the way.

Stand away, say the way.

Stand away, say the way. Sail away Sail away Sail away

Sail away

Sail away Sail away

Sillow

thi

throw

thee

the

the

the the t-

. It's... In the island by beneath So boo. Feel the power drive along from Bali to Kali

forth beneath the corossi.

Duh.

Duh.

Duh.

Duh, Duh, Duh, Duh, Duh,

Silloway, Say the way, say the way, say the way,

say the way, say the way, say the way, Save the way, say sail away. Sail away, sail away, sail away, sail away.

Sail away, sail away, sail away.

From the way to the south, every day on to Coton,

From the deep sea of clouds to the island of the moon.

Carry me on the waves to the lands I've never been.

Carry me from the waves to the lands I've never seen.

We can sail, we can sail, we can sail, we can sail, we can sail sail, we can sail, we can sail, we can sail, we can sail, sail, we can say, we can say, sail away, sail away, say the way.

We can say the way.

We can sign it by crossing his dependency.

We can say, we can sail away, sail away, sail away, say, we can sail away the way, say, say, say the way, say the way, say it

say, say the way, say the way, say the way, say the way.

Silloway, say the way, stay away.

Say the way, stay away, stay away. Stay away, stay away, stay away, stay away.

Stay away, stay away, stay away.

Stay the way, stay away.

Stay away, stay away, stay away, say away. Sill away, Scare away, Sill away. Uh-huh. Ah Come on my stern

Come on my stern I I'm not the today. Come on my share, you're so far, though so far. Siest don't eat the light, Eschard nur für you.

Come on my stern, I think thi sick, I hatedic haste I te.

Tol'est it's not deep, I'm not so ignorant.

Toll that it'sisukes I hat ich derail t'tolerat'tzichty'n'ltzichty'n'kii't,

Come on my teste errs'er, you're so nigh and so far.

See you in night and so far Siest to need nichtlich

Eschard tue furs to die

tischurches

Come on my stare

I think

Tins T'est isn't

T'oe

it's tischie, I'm so in each Berlin Berlin. Come on my stern!

Oh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Aha!

Come on my stern I I'm the able to be able to be able to be a piece of it. Oh, no, no, no, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, Oh ha! Ah! Ah!

Ah!

Ah!

Ah!

Ah! Ah!

tom

Come on my this stare!

You're so nigh and so far!

See's tunnel!

the light?

It shines to me that's nic,

Eschise undueue für you.

Come on my strens

I think tisk

I tisk

T'oeilets is not easy

I'm so in thee. I'm so in the t Veriliennit.

Come on my stare,

You're not undisturbed

You're so dark and so far.

Seize you mean the light,

It shines only tue to tue!

Come on my star,

I think tisens ich

Didst eat eat

I tendishish

?

? Vali I fescent to in the Berlin. Verdi.

Verdi.

Verdi.

Veri.

Verim

Verim

Verim

Verde Verde Hurtain

takes to me,

It will end up to you did

I hate you only a man to do you want you

hear the'an' Who's the end of the internet

time, you know, get to the end of be the tape to be the touches.

You the touch on the treaty. I I'm not a todment the's the only the today, the truth,

the nation's life and love to be able to be in love.

You're the sound of life, I do the heart's the that You are the-like toue to me.

That's the to you.

Oh, tomorrow.

A little.

That's the the that's a good, to be able to Oh, today.

to...

to... I the today, but you're not so much, but not to be the heart of the treaty. I'm not sure. Oh, you know, the to be the world, that's the treaty.

I love to be very good.

You're not the.

the's good tomorrow.

Oh, the end. The best.

That's the time.

That's the right.

Oh, oh, oh,

a minute. Say him that I see him so geanumannes.

Leave me, sneillmaid shenellain.

Beelish, alone, eh,

Liebreeze alone. I love me. Hold on a bunch of people. Who's a Bagerbomb?

Rosa Bagebun!

Rosa Bage!

Binge!

Binge here!

Rosa Bage!

Rhozavoges!

Rhee! Oh, the whole today. I don't know what you feel that is my first.

I'm not going to be able to be I

that is

I the the I'm sorry,rying to go out. I I Oh, I'm gonna be able to try and try to make a try to make a try to the trying to try to I I'm the. I I'm trying to try to to be

the today

to

the

to

the I'm gonna Oh Welcome.

Welcome. How's everybody doing?

We are yet again having another one of our bi-weekly high-quality infrared streams.

What's up everybody? Feels like it's been a long time.

I might start doing these Wednesday to distribute them because they're all happening at the end

of the week, Sunday and Thursday kind of close together and we should probably diversify it a little bit

How's everybody doing?

So status report have you all been being lazy?

Have you all stopped pumping out the, stop fighting the info war?

What's going on with the moment?

I'm just kidding.

I got eyes everywhere and I'm watching all the time.

Can always see what you guys are doing.

Because I'm stalking you.

Because Big Brother is watching you because this is a cult.

Now on some serious shit I think I have some stuff I want to talk about today some high

quality stuff and and we're going to cover some news as well. Although, you know, I don't

know if it's just me. I just kind of find news boring a little bit. I don't know if that's

just me. You know, if I was an infrared viewer, if I was somebody who views this, I would say,

I would actually want to see some of the high-quality theory stuff.

I want to see this guy's views on things.

I want to hear him talk about interesting things, right?

But it's okay, we're going to do news for the retards, because there's some people that... I'm just kidding, I'm just kidding, but there's some people that just want the news.

They just want to hear about news and they want me to commensurate on the news.

And I'm gonna basically give it to you simply. Everyone keeps saying that this is it as far as South Lebanon is concerned.

Meaning, this is the war officially as it started.

Israel's unprecedented attacks on South Lebanon, Hezbollah's attacks today on Israel,

signify the start of a real full-scale war between

Hezbollah and Israel.

Well, we'll see, because I remember people saying that earlier as well.

I remember people saying that months and months ago, right?

I know Hezbollah is striking Israel right now, but it's just like a quantitative. I'm going

to update you on what's going on, all right? The difference is so far a quantitative escalation. It's not a qualitative change as far as I could see.

Although some people are saying that, I don't see that yet. Although it's very clear,

it's very, very clear that they don't stand a chance.

Hasbullah will defeat the Zionist entity as they've done before.

I have no doubt about that whatsoever.

I think there's a madness prevailing in the so-called Israeli government,

which, according to which, they can somehow take on the entire world.

By the way, Darg! I see you, brother. I see you Darg.

I see you, Ron Swanson, Stalinist. What's going on, guys? I see you dark. I see you Ron Swanson, Stalinists. What's going on guys? I see that.

But in any case, there's a madness prevailing in the... I don't know what's going on with the leadership of the Zionist density.

They think they can somehow take on Hezbollah and Hamas, and it also seems like they're

itching for a war with Iran.

What else but madness?

People say madness couldn't possibly be a factor in how people in power are behaving

and acting.

Well, look at Hitler in his last days in his bunker.

Look at Hitler's madness. It's madness. Simple. Simple. It's not going to be 2006 all over again.

It's going to be a worst defeat for the Zionist entity and we are witnessing the limits reached

by the Zionist ideology itself.

It's at the threshold of what it's able to accomplish as an ideology.

In terms of being a reality, being reflective of reality, it's just at its limits, you know.

Reality is knocking on the door and they're trying to keep it shut as hard as they can. It's not working.

And this is the madness that usually accompanies the collapse of states and governments

and things of that nature.

You know, it's interesting, I was on Twitter today.

I'm on Twitter every day, of course, and I saw a tweet.

It's very tragic and it's very sad.

And it says, communism is Jewish.

I want to actually talk about this. Just like that. And this guy, Stu Peters,

let's see Stu Peters. St. Peters, he, you know, I'm not going to lie. Kind of looks like he might

be mentally disabled, so I'll go easy on him

But Stu Peters definitely looks mentally disabled. Let me just show this to you. Stu Peters. I think he's mentally disabled

This kind of like a dead, dead stare.

I don't know what this is.

Definitely some mental disabilities going on.

This guy claims communism is Jewish and then look what he lists.

Carl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky.

Now I'll cut the story short.

This is going to get a bunch of likes by the way.

It's already at 4.5,000.

I'm showing you this tweet because I want you guys I want you gorillas to

respond to this tweet the right way, okay? This is so fucking stupid. I mean what a fucking retard first of all but anyway let's not get emotional.

Communism is Jewish, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky. Now what's the problem with this?

And I read the community note, the proposed one, I was really disappointed by it.

Lenin is not a Jew at all.

Lenin's grandfather was not Jewish.

It's a lie.

It's a fabrication.

We've provided a source in this thread,

let me find it, showing that Lenin had no Jewish ancestry.

Now, why is that important?

It's not necessarily that important, but

it's important because there's neo-Nazi misinformation

that's basically infiltrating established sources.

I mean, Wikipedia lists Lenin as a quarter Jewish.

It's actually not true, okay? There were two, there are other Alexander Blanks, okay?

And there were specifically two of them with recorded biographies that were deliberately mixed to feed the narrative of the Judeo-Bolcivism nonsense that Lenin was a quarter Jewish.

But it's not true, okay? So stop conceding that. It's literally not even fucking true.

Now second of all, of course

everyone knows Lenin didn't even know, but what's the problem with this by the way? I mean

I'm breaking this down rationally as though you can reason with this Down syndrome half-human

ape beast who can't even use reason.

I don't know what what right wingers are like they fucking animals, are they swine, are they incapable of reason?

I don't understand what it fucking is, because I reason with them, I show them evidence,

we have an entire fucking thread where we discarded this nonsense and these half human, half

beast, retard monkey, apling fucking

Down syndrome extra chromosome

Autistic extreme ass burgers far beyond the spectrum

Actual mental pygmy. I don't fucking know what to call them. They're like actual

animals that are barking. I just hear them bark.

Do you choose the j- but can you respond to reason? Is there any ability to reason with these people?

Are theythese people?

Are they even people?

I don't know.

I mean, if I say the sky is blue and they say, no, it's probably...

I mean, isn't there some kind of way that we could say,

okay, what's your evidence?

How do we know this? Is there any way to test this

well look what he said I just find it kind of funny he says Carl Marx Vladimir

Lenin Leon Trotsky two out of three of these people are Jews so communism is

certainly Jewish right and I don't know how 4.5,000 people like

this. Every single one of these 4.5,000 people mentally retarded. We're going to talk about

this topic today, not the JQ stuff.

But do you guys notice something wrong with this?

Carl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky.

Just like a basic exercise in logic, okay?

Well, Karl Marx was Jewish, there's no need to deny that. He was a Jew. I mean, at least by their

standard, he was a Jew. And so was Leon Trotsky. but what's the issue here?

Does anyone understand the issue?

Um, why is Trotsky even fucking mentioned? That's the issue. Why is Trotsky

mentioned? And how many people are they leaving out that are fundamental in defining what communism

was historically, an actual experience?

Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao.

Need I go on?

Ho Chi-Min, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, basically every other prominent communist in

history throughout the entirety of the Cold War in the developing world. by the way, there is a time in which 25% of the world's population

We're living under communist governments, so there's a whole host of communist experience

That's defining what communism is and only only Karl Marx among the main figureheads are Jewish

Now people could say well, what about Rosa Luxembourg and these other people in Europe and Bella Coon?

Well, they didn't create communist states, so they had no hand into...

I mean, the communism, this word, people know about this word because of the Cold War

and actual communist states, okay?

So, people like Bellacoon, briefly ruled over Hungary.

Thank you, Anonymous.

Are anti-communist neo-Nazi theories being boosted on Twitter?

I think so. I don't know what else to explain it.

But I'm going to continue.

Bella Coon, what, a year or two,the hungarian so it republic and then it it collapsed

there is no experience of actual communism there okay it's just a very brief

spontaneous sporadic thing

now roza luxenberg i regard her as a hero. Don't get me wrong.

I'm just saying blackpack. Wow with the 20. I see you.

See you black bag. What's going on? So and then finally Leon Trotsky. What's what communist

state did Leon Trotsky build? Trotsky was kicked out of the Soviet Union in the late 20s.

What is Trotsky known for except trying to destroy the Soviet Union?

Yeah, he was the commander of the Red Army.

In the early days, he wasn't even a Bolshevik. Trotsky is at best a footnote in communist history.

So look at this actual fucking retard.

This guy's actually retarded, you know that? He says communism is Jewish

and then for no reason at all he names Trotsky as the prominent figures in historical communism.

He doesn't name Mao, he doesn't name Jijin Ping, he doesn't name Deng Xiaoping, he doesn't name any of the brown

communists, even though they're the most numerous. He doesn't name Frederick Engels, he doesn't name

Joseph Stalin. He only, he deliberately names Trotsky because Trotsky's a Jew.

Do you understand that like twisted reasoning that these right-wingers are using, if you even call it that?

They deliberately go out of their way to exaggerate the significance of people who are Jewish, not because those

people represent communism, but because they're Jewish.

These Twitter wignits are clowns.

Yeah, they're not even clowns because they're not even funny.

This guy is probably someone who wants to be a comedian, but he's not.

I don't even know who this guy is.

I'm going to be honest.

I don't even know who he is, but 4.5,000 people like this. I'm beginning, you know, I'm increasingly of the

opinion, you just can't reason with these fucking people. Like we're trying so hard and you just can't.

You know, I think they only respond to force. They only respond to force. They only respond to

power. They don't respond to like saying, hey, wait a minute, you know, Lenin wasn't even

Jewish at all.

Trotsky's not even, he's barely relevant to communism.

Trotsky never presided over a communist state.

He never built a communist state.

On the contrary, he just tried to destroy them.

So why are you, etc. do you in the etc is just like a bunch of

Asian and brown people. The etc is just like a bunch of Asian and South American

and Arab and African people who are not Jewish at all.

But that's a really, the etc. in this sentence is like really, really tired.

It's like really carrying a lot, you know?

This is like Carl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, and then you have this

etc that contains Engels, Stalin, Mao, you know, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez. I mean

it's just like, this et cetera is like Atlas. It has the whole

weight of the world on its shoulders. It's really carrying this sentence with

all its might. Pretty incredible. Pretty incredible.

Pretty incredible. You just have to laugh and mock these fucking retards.

You should just absolutely humiliate mock and laugh at these fucking people.

I don't care at this stage. He's not saying this for any other

reason than to take a swipe at us. I hope you know that. Stu Peters is only saying

this to take a swipe at Haas at Jackson Hinkle at infrared at us. He's doing it to attack us you know the Maga

communists no other reason he's they're doing this and they're saying this okay

let me tell you something you can say this all you want keep peddling this we are confident

that we're going to win anyway so keep saying this keep saying it it's not

going to change the fact we're coming it's not going to change the damn thing.

Communism is Jewish. It's Jewish. Okay, then Christianity is Jewish too, you fucking retard.

Does no one care about that irony?

The guy's got a cross in his bio. He goes,

communism is Jewish. Really, who's this? What is this cross about? Who's the guy on

this cross? Is it just a coincidence he was a Jew? Was it just a coincidence? It's a

coincidence, isn't it?

It's such an irony.

It's almost like the obsession with Jews

is like a theological problem,

some unfinished business

rather than something about the entire fucking world.

You know, yeah, let's burn the Old Testament.

Guys, guys, some guys, I just found out, you know, Abraham and Moses.

You know, all these people in the Bible that are like prophets? Dude, they're Jews. Holy shit, is it a coincidence? Dude, the Bible is more Jewish than communism. Isn't that crazy? The actual literal Bible is more

both the Old Testament and the New Testament is more Jewish than communism is.

Because there's no Asians in the Bible. Is not a single, I don't know. Is there a single Chinese guy in the Bible?

I don't think there is.

I don't think there's a single Chinese guy in the whole old or the New Testament, right?

Not a single one.

So I'm pretty sure you're, you know, more Jewish than the thing you're claiming is Jewish.

If the irony is lost on them though, it's incredible.

It's absolutely incredible.

You know, and I'm saying this because I look on my TL, what's going on?

And you think we're in the midst of the communist revolution right now.

You think we're in the midst of a mass movement calling for the nationalization of the energy and the transportation, the railways, and you know,

the minerals and the means of production and the factories and there's a full-blown

communist movement underway, which there is.

It's us.

But you'd think in the mood of this country, if you were transported,

you were going on X, oh my God, communism in America, there must be this mass workers movement.

You know, that's calling for the fundamentals of the economy to be held in common and in the common

interest.

And it's like you look around and what do you see?

Nothing.

It's like where is this communist boogieman even fucking coming from?

Stu Peters, you fucking retard.

The most relevant communist phenomena is China.

Now I could be wrong.

But when I look at those Chinese guys, you know, I don't know, doesn't look very Jewish to me,

but I could be wrong, you know, maybe I'm just a Jew myself trying to deceive you.

But I don't know. I don't know. I think that the country that gives the most immediate significance to the word communism,

because it's literally ruled by a ruling Communist Party, over 90 million strong,

not sure if there's a lot of Jews over there.

And how do I know this?

Well, I just kind of look at their faces and I just...

I don't really see a lot of... I mean, I don't know, guys.

What do you guys think?

Maybe, maybe... what do you guys think? Maybe, maybe, what do you guys think?

Guys, he said, communism is Jewish. You know how you should have responded to that?

You know how you should have unironically responded to that tweet?

You should have just been like, does this look like a Jew to you?

Just be like, I don't know, Stu Peters, this guy doesn't really look very Jewish to me.

But I could be wrong.

I could be wrong.

Maybe I'm just Jewish myself.

Because Rev. Link to thisthis and look at their replies

the first thing is people calls him a Jew.

Where is it at?

I remember that was Karim.

You're the Jew and you're lying. Mark's daddy was a rabbi and a Jew so

Marx is a Jew and Lenin to Trotsky Daddy was a Jew too. I just got a fucking

aneurism reading this.

Uh, should I be envious that there's not retards in my movement?

Like we don't have a single like Down syndrome actual Spurg retard in our movement.

Not a single one.

But they're way more inclusive than us. They just bring, I'm not even kidding, we should have more numbers, we should have more people. It's kind of a shame. I'm kind of

envious. We never have people who type things out like this. I'm not even talking about the content.

I'm talking about the content. I'm

talking about just the form, like how retarded. Clearly like disabled this person is. We don't

have anyone like that. Hey, unanimous. Stephen Cotkin. Um, you know, he's, uh, I don't want to call him a good historian.

I'll just say, Stephen Cotkin, you know, you should read him, not, not so you accept what he says blindly, but, you know, you should read him not not so you accept what he says

blindly but you know he he in his mind he's trying to compile facts together

and you could use that to your advantage with research so you could use him for

research he's not like, I'll tell you

this, I don't think Stephen Codkin's a type of historian who like goes out of

his way to make things up. He's not like Robert Conquest or that service guy. He, you know, he's wrong about a lot of things, even most things, but he's not going to go out of his way to like make things up in his own mind. He's going to try to arrive at the factual truth in his own flawed way.

Not like, yeah, he's not like Timothy Snyder.

That's like kind of the revisionist school of Soviet historiography.

They're kind of just like trying to, the best of their limited, puny, undialectical, bourgeois

ability, arrive at the factual truth.

Failing to, and the whole story at least but

they're definitely better they're definitely more professional than like these

other historians like Timothy Snyder and Robert Conquest and whatnot.

So that's an important thing to keep in mind.

You know, um... I find it really interesting though that also I want to start getting into more debates

but nobody wants to debate me.

We all were past this.

But I'd like to, I kind of want to have a debate tonight, but stop, because I know there's

going to be community members.

They get in VC and they're like, I'll debate you Haas and then they're going to drag

them up into VC.

Hi Ha! Ha! and then they're gonna drag them up into VC. Ha ha ha haze.

What's going on?

And I'm actually looking for like actual ops, you know.

I'm not looking for social hour.

All right, we have some other breaking news.

Apparently I'm exposed.

Samuel Hazeldeen is an English actor working in film.

Uh, I'm not even joking about this.

There's actual some, there's actually some people that will look at this.

And they'll be like, this is irrefutable proof that Haas is an MI6.

Did you guys know that?

There's actually some people that will look at something like this and they'll be like,

I have irrefutable proof.

Haas is in MI6.

Oh, what's your proof?

Well, he's an English actor, Samuel Hazaldine.

Coincidence, I think not.

You know what else is English?

The MI6, therefore HaZ is in the MI6.

I'm not even kidding. That's their way of reasoning.

Um, and people...

I guess there's a demand for it, you know, people kind of... I don't think people believe it, but I just think they just

They just looking for any thing to dream about, you know, people are dreaming

They want it to be true. I want to believe I want to believe

I want to believe I want to believe I wanttrue. I want to believe. I want to believe. I want to believe. Who is this? Who the fuck is this?

Who is this woman?

Anyone know who this is?

Celebrating today's passage of the Assad regime anti-normalization act in the house. Who is this?

I mean I don't know I don't know what's going on. I've never...

Is that a politician?

Is that a politician?

Who is that?

Oh no, it's not.

It's just an activist.

I thought that was like a Congress.

I have one Jewish ancestor. Here's just an activist. I thought that was like a Congress. Altay, what's going on?

Wow.

Here's your corporate Talmudic funding.

Altay Khan, oh my god, what did you do to me?

You're just, I'm funded by Jews, guys.

No way out of it. Thank you man, I appreciate you.

Iranian diaspora, interesting, all right, interesting. I'm just saying, interesting, all right?

Interesting. Interesting, all right, interesting.

You know, not too interesting. I'm going to be honest, not too interesting. Anyway,

All right, what are we looking at?

All right, what are we looking at and show requests?

2036, dude, this is unironically how some people like do research accordingly.

Check this out.this is a fucking crazy

coincidence all right Hasroff Doolow, British writer, director and producer Hasraf

DeLul also known as Haas.

Now why am I showing you this guy named Hasroff DeLuol, also known as Haas?

Because apparently, he directed and co-produced a film called 2036 Origin Unknown in 2018.

Oh my home! We found it!

I'm not even kidding. There's some people that I've seen.

You probably seen them too.

Or maybe they blocked you, but this is actually like how they reason.

This is how they like accuse people of being CIA.

So Haas is actually Haas-Rof-Dalul.

It's actually me.

I'm actually Hoss-Rof.

The whole infrared project was a fictional story written by Hosff Dallul turned into an ARG.

Created by the KGB.

The Jews control all of it.

You know what's fucking weird?

He kind of looks like me, you know. This is him.

Well, does he look like me? Hasroftalul got some surgeries, you know? Close enough.

Close enough, right? Doesn't this look just like me or no like if I was Indian

or no no no no

this is him.

But you don't think this looks like me?

Not at all.

What a shame. What a shame. What a shame. Here I thought I looked good. I don't look anything like this guy. Therefore, I must be ugly. Anyway... Too Mad passed away.

Apparently he was a horrible person.

I don't know anything about him.

I'm not even going to comment on the situation.

I don't even know anything about what didn't he wasn't

he like didn't he like quote to eat me once I think he did.

Didn't he?

He quote-tweeted me once, didn't he?

In a bad way, he was like attacking me.

Anyway, I don't celebrate people's death.

I don't know who he is.

I don't know anything about him.

That was some big news that passed.

Sorry, that was blowing up. It was big news.

A lot of people were talking about it.

He's a rapist. I didn't know that.

I'm not even going to... I don't know. I haven't been confronted with anything.

I don't know. I'm not been confronted with anything. I don't know.

I'm not gonna bother.

All right.

Anyway,

Let's get on to the business at hand. What is this?

Hold on. Is this real?

Iran declares Antarctica its property in direct challenge the most badass thing ever. So based. Let me look this up.

This is actually real.

Iran declares Antarctica, it's... Okay, one of these sources is like a virus.

Give me a second.

The Washington examiner, Iran claims ownership and plans military base there.

The Navy Rear declared that his country has property rights.

What's up, Kodalong?

As I have irrefutable proof that Taylor Swift said the N-word.

You can expose it. I will texttext you please send me your phone number on

discord. I would never do that in a million years. Um, giving code along my

actual phone number, I think I'd rather like kill myself probably.

Well, I could just get a new number to be honest. It's not that dramatic, but if Kodalong had my phone number,

I would get spam called every second of the day

from 3,000 different phone numbers because the guy just has a fetish for making

alts and just like I don't know.

No dude, you already fucking have my discord server.

Anyway, he declared that his country has property rights in Antarctica and the South Pole.

With regard to the South Pole, we have property rights there.

They belong to the public.

Our plan is to raise the flag there. It is not only military work but also scientific work that needs to be carried out.

I support this fully.

You know, I was thinking, when I was, a few years ago, I was thinking of like this idea, you know, somebody was like,

you know, Hoss, you can make money from script writing.

What if you wrote a script for a movie? And I said, you know, if I did that, I would want to do something

like Pirates of

the Caribbean, but the Safavit Empire is getting in on it.

It makes no sense geographically, but like the idea is like Persia goes to the new world like the 1600s, 1700s, and it's like a huge adventure and it's

like pirates of the Caribbean, but it's like the Safavid Empire, explorers.

And now there's going to be a scene in my head.

I was imagining the scene.

There's like a Safavid galley.

It's like sailing in the smooth waters at night.

And then as soon as it's nighttime nighttime you look up into the night sky and

it's like this huge extremely detailed bright looks like outer space like

looks like an alien world.

It's like, the stars are like so colorful, everything's so cool.

You see the constellations and shit, and it's like ancient Iranian esoteric astrology. I have not done any drugs. All right. Anyway, I don't even want to bother

explaining my thoughts. I just gave you a really cool visual that you can keep in your head

All right. I don't fucking know what a galley is all right. I just what is a galley? What's a pirate ship?

What is a okay? One of them ships they were using back in the day, all right? God damn, crucify me man.

See like the visionary director doesn't even have to know stupid details, all right?

I could just get people to research that for me. I have the vision.

It's all matters. So somebody give me

money and I'll make that movie. You know, maybe the Iranian government can commission me to

direct that movie and you know, it'll be a killing. It'd be such a cool movie. I'm sorry. All right, everyone's talking about Toker Carlson in Moscow, so I guess I have to look

at this and see it.

Check it out. The grocery store

Tucker Carlson at the grocery store.

Here it is.

Let's check it out.

A longstanding feature, maybe the longest standing feature of Cold War propaganda in the

West was the Soviet grocery store.

No products, no choices, shotly made things, and it wasn't actually propaganda, it was real.

And you can look up the pictures on the internet if you want.

So we thought it would be interesting to take a look at a contemporary, modern day,

2024 Russian grocery store two years into sanctions.

Here we go.

All right.

There we go.

So I guess you put in 10 roubles here

and you get it back when you put the cart back. So it's free but there's an incentive to return it

and not just bring it to your homeless and camping. Okay, this is the grocery

cart escalator. This is designed, I'm figuring this out now, where the wheels don't

move, they lock. I like, I like, people say like Russia has nothing to do with communism,

but like these visuals are clearly some kind of, some kind of thematic continuities going on here.

I mean I'm not saying that's you know that proves everything all and I'm just saying it's

like you know you it's very common when you're in Russia to see things like that everywhere you know to see a

thematic continuity with the past. Look Ma no hands. Retail placement here is a

little bit different. It's like walking through Macy's to get to Whole Foods.

Okay, we've gotten through the perfume section to get to the grocery store. So we're going

to try and buy what a family of four would buy every week and we're going to see what

the selection is and we're going to see what it costs.

A red star? That's just a coincidence, all right? Now Russia is famous for its bread.

Which is one thing I can assess pretty well.

The low-carb lifestyle has not swept Russia.

Uh, thank heaven because they, I mean, look at that.

It's fresh, too. Look at that. Oh

Come on

Unicorn and mini mills

All right

Oh

Oh Oh Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh!

Some kind of Russian wheat cookies. Ooh, we need coffee, don't we?

I don't know if this is sugar or flour,to be honest with you, but it looks like a staple

so we should get it.

It's a very good looking package.

It's got to be flour, right?

And this is Russian wine.

It's from Crimea, which not only has the warm water naval base, but also is the source of most of the grapes in this part of Russia

for wine. So it's apparently pretty good. Cheese puffs, you check out of a grocery store and you've got gum, razor blades, and candy,

actually they hide the razor blades because we steal them.

But these are all, seem to be Western products. Mars, Twix, Snvelers, Milky Way, bounty, Gillette,

Paul's cough drops, mentos.

It's pretty non-sanctioned to me, but what do I know?

I went from a muse to legitimately angry.

You know, one thing you realize traveling around the world,

I've only been in one place, outside America.

What's up, Johnny?

Tucker's tick is that the Soviet Union was evil and repressive, but now that Russia is

not communist anymore, they're cool.

Yeah, that makes sense that that's what he thinks, but who gives a shit?

The end result is less hostility to Russia.

Who gives a fuck what stupid reasoning people use in their head.

I mean, we care about it, obviously, but we can see in the short term it's not a bad thing.

So we were guessing what this would cost.

Everybody hears from the United States buys groceries and we didn't pay any attention to

costs we were just putting in the cart, we would actually eat over a week.

And we all came in around 400 bucks, about 400 bucks.

It was $104 U.S. here.

And that's when you start to realize that ideology maybe doesn't matter as much as you

thought, corruption, if you

take people's standard of living and you tank it through filth and crime and

inflation and they literally can't buy the groceries they want, at that point

maybe it matters less what you say or whether you're a good person or a bad person,

you're wrecking people's lives in their country, and that's what our leaders have done to us.

And coming to a Russian grocery store, the heart of evil,

and seeing what things cost and how people live, it will radicalize you against our leaders.

That's how I feel anyway, radicalized.

We're not making any of this up by the way, at all.

All right, I have a few thoughts. Some people are saying, a lot of people are saying like, uh, you know,

Tucker is just purchasing power difference, which I think ignores the point,

which is the crazy inflation that we've just normalized in the US, you know, spanning over the course even of a few years.

But if you look at it in terms of decades even one decade ago compared to now the crazy diminishing

You know purchasing power of Americans is incredible

People have experienced that tangibly

They've noticed that they can buy less when they go to the supermarket.

You know, so I think people are kind of missing the fucking point.

Anyway, I also think that people may say, well, this is just Moscow.

What about the rest of Russia? And then I'd say, well, eventhis is just Moscow. What about the rest of Russia?

And then I'd say, well, even if you go to America's major cities,

they really suck.

Even our major cities suck, you know?

Even affluent cities in America suck.

Um, so yeah, this is why people are getting radicalized, as Tucker said.

I don't think it's because he's stupid. I think people are missing the point, actually.

Very clearly, actually, people are missing the point.

But what do I know, right?

I'm just, uh...

Freaking tanky.

You know, you know, there's something a little bit wrong going on. You want to know what that is? Infrared is not showing up in the just chatting section. Why the fuck is that? That is quite an enigma.

If I do say so. That is quite an enigma. Why am I not showing up on kick is, kicks, just chatting section?

What is this? You guys if you go on, don't, yeah, shadow

band? I guess I am. Shadowband. I'm going to have to email them about that. What the hell is going on?

What the hell is going on? This must be an error of some kind.

You see me there? Okay, if you see me there, you see me there. Anyway, I'm there

now. I just fucking appeared there right now. I literally just looked at it now and I'm there.

Okay. So, that's really interesting. That's incredible. Okay, anyway, enough distractions.

As soon as we like mentioned it,

everything was fixed, so that's all that matters.

There's things I'd like to talk about today.

I would like to actually...

Okay, hold on. We got some good news, but I can't talk to you about it. But we're going to watch Tucker's all other video, and then we're going to get on to what I wantedson visiting the Moscow subway station.

139K likes, okay.

And there's some things I'd like to say about this.

And then we'll go into show request, sure.to say about this.

And then we'll go into short real question.

Let's watch this first.

One of the ways you understand a society is through its infrastructure, the places where

people gather, the places where they go to travel, you've got a lot of people in one

place that tells you a lot about the people.

So with that in mind,

we're standing in front of the Kiev Skye Metro Station and this train station

next to it. Now the Metro Station was built by Joseph Stalin 70 years ago.

Wow, thanks Tucker. I didn't know you were going to say that. I thought he was just gonna

not mention that. I thought he was just going to not mention that.

Thanks, Tucker.

His first thing he mentioned, that's so cool.

And the question is, how's it doing now?

After 70 years.

So we went into it to take a look,

and what we found shocked us. Now that's

not an endorsement of Stalin. It was bad obviously. Nah. You take the yell for that.

Or is it an endorsement of the current president, Vladimir Putin, you may not like him either.

Well he's got a he's to play safe with his optics.

You know, you can't expect them to fully...

But it doesn't change the reality of what we saw or, more precisely didn't see.

There's no graffiti, there's no filth, but no foul smells.

There are no bums or drug addicts or rapists for people waiting to push you onto the train tracks and kill you.

I'm gonna talk about why that is.

No, it's perfectly clean and orderly.

And how do you explain that? We're not even going to guess. That's not our job.

We're only going to ask the question. And if your response is to shout at us slogans

dumber than the slogans we used to call Soviet and mock, that's not really an answer. How does Russia, a country we're told is a gas station with nuclear weapons,

have a subway station that normal people used to get to work and home every single day

that's nicer than anything in our country.

Because of communism.

We're not going to get, we're not going to speculate.

We're just going to raise the question and wait for someone in charge to give us an answer.

What is the answer? So we'll stop the lecture and let you... and wait for someone in charge to give us an answer.

What is the answer?

So I'll stop the lecture and let you take a look for yourself

at what the Kiev-Skaya Metro Station in Moscow, Russia

looks like today, February 2024, in the middle of a war.

Here it is. Ha ha ha! Comrade Tucker.

That's so nice he's showing the truth.

That's so nice he's showing the truth. I'm a today. Wow! That's so beautiful.

That's so beautiful.

That's so beautiful Tucker shows this. I mean

Just one trip to Moscow change, you know

Has such an impact on him. It's so incredible incredible. Look at this.

Look at this.

This is the founder of the era we live in.

Not just Russia's, the whole world. Very cool. Very cool, Tucker. Really enjoyed it. Now show NYC and we're going to talk about this.

Why is NYC such a shit all in comparison the New York subway and so on

and so forth. I'm going to talk about that but I have to clear out my throat. I mean, I've to, I'm gonna, I also,

I've been making poor dietary choices,

which I'll also talk about.

Just give me a sec, all right.

Give me a damn second. Thank you. Yeah, yesterday was Valentine's Day, which I spent with my, spent with my,

spent with my, spent with my Mrs.

you know.

But then for the rest of the day we just went to my parents and hung out.

You know why?

Because I should have done a Valentine's Day stream right at Illinois time but

it's like when you really think about it when you have when you're in a

relationship with someone it's like it's not just you, it's your whole family.

You know what I mean?

It's like you're just 10% of it, 90% of it is family.

You're the 10% that's extending it and bringing it forward,

like potentially with having a kid,

you know, passing down your legacy.

But anyway, I was eating straight garbage yesterday, you know, a bunch of candies and sweets

and just a little not good stuff at all not good stuff.

Not good stuff.

Ah, feel sick already. Anyway, let's get to the business at hand. I'm not having a kid,

I'm just saying like, you know, Valentine's Day is just...

You should spend half of it with your family probably, right?

Because it's like, they're the reason you even exist.

Anyway, um, anyway, we're going to look at one last thing and then I'm going to talk about the thing

I wanted to talk about.

Someone put this in show request, the KKE on civil marriage and same-sex couples and its

impact on children's rights.

These guys have done a hit piece about me, so keep and out of date.

Recently met the president of the KKE on civil marriage and same-sex couples. This is a way paved trafficking and refugee children.

Wow. This is awaypaved trafficking and refugee children.

Wow.

This same applies to adoption.

Given that the number of adoption applications filed by couples or individuals are many

times higher than the number of children for adoption and child protection structures,

the ways essentially pay for trafficking and refugee children,

but also children from countries where people are starving.

The first and main reason for Kiki's refusal to extend civil marriage to same-sex couples

is the commercial realization of procreation and adoption.

I think that's a very reasonable position.

A second equally important related reason is that the bill bypass social rights of a child

to the motherhood father of relation as an evolving biosocial relationship.

Our party considers the parenthood is the relationship between a parent and the child, which at the

individual level reflects existing social relations.

This is a very interesting position they have

on this the gay marriage question.

It's not, it's not, their position is not based on

the bourgeois degeneracy thing.

Capitalist degeneracy position,

which is orthodox ML.

They're not, they don't uphold that position.

They rather uphold a curious position on it,

which is interesting to think about. I don't know if I agree

with it. The KAA's position is based on the rights of the child, the child's

social need to have ties with the mother and father. This need has an objective

basis. The interrelated motherhood

fatherhood relation resulting from the complementary function of man and

woman in the process of procreation. Like when I say communism is conservative

it's pretty much like... this is kind of a basic form of reasoning

which only today is considered unacceptable by I guess leftists but their

position is more or less like the family is based on bourgeois relations, based

on capitalist relations.

But for that reason, um, needs to be defended.

Because it's almost like they're combining a kind of like normative position with the analytical one.

It's very interesting.

And I've read their earlier writings about this.

The KKA more or less says something along the lines of like, they give a description of

the family under capitalism, right? And then simultaneously they say because this is objectively true,

normatively speaking, we reject attempts to extend marriage beyond this as this deviates from the fundamental reality.

It's very interesting, you know, it's an interesting

form of Marxist conservatism, or Western Marxist conservatism in a sense, right?

It's unique to say the least. Here but here they say something

different they say that humans are social being, natural beings, their natural needs, like their social

needs, can only be meant in a social way.

The motherhood and father are inherent to the species.

Humans are the sum total of social relations, a fact that does not negate their biological

nature, but includes it. Individual responsibility.

So they say it's not related to the sexual orientation

to its stance toward homosexuality or bisexualities and expression of sexuality.

We recall more of all

Kays made legislative proposals and develop political actions in order to abolish any form of

isolation condemning form of racism against...

This is mistranslated.

Condemning any form of racism against people of homosexual orientation.

I almost admire this.

It's like boomers run the party and they're trying to be responsive to the younger people I imagine.

I'm like okay whatever yeah we're against racism to the gays.

We oppose the exclusion of homosexuals from apprenticeship, employment, housing, K-A fights against

any kind of discrimination.

Yeah, I mean, their position isn't, people are like,

this is too dogmatic and orthodox.

This is not an orthodox ML position,

because the orthodox ML position is that the gay rights movement is capitalist degeneracy

It's always been only changed with the new left

And the KKE everyone says it's like an Orthodox Stalinist party.

It's really not.

It's the KKE is just as much a product of the new left as anything else.

It's just that they have an eccentric position.

The difference with the, but here's the truth, the KKE just hasn't compromised

its position. I mean, look, they're very cringe about the Russia-Ukraine war, but I can confidently say

the Communist Party of Greece has the position it has because of its own dogmatism, not because it's opportunistic in the sense of like

being connected to Western NGOs or Western imperial interests on a material level.

I don't think they are.

I don't see any evidence of that.

They just are assuming the wrong position out of dogmatism, out of a theoretical dogmatism,

which I guess is more respectable than leftists but in any case they

don't want to win I've talked about this before the this is a party that

doesn't want to win They want to remain in opposition forever.

So that's that. I don't find that very interesting, if I'm going to be honest.

Not the most riveting news or information I've seen. I'm not very interesting if I'm going to be honest.

Not the most riveting news or information I've seen.

Anyway, what I'd like to talk about is why is it that the subway in New York is so shitty,

why is America in decline, yada yada, yada. Let's talk about conspiracy

theories. You know, I remember Russia Gate, but even before Russia Gate I remember the WikiLeaks email scandal.

I remember reading Hillary Clinton's emails and the emails of all these people in the State Department.

And you want to know what I found. you can you can do it yourself be my guest

What I found

moving through these emails and and reading them is that I found people who were learning about history and reality

and sharing information with each other that you would expect them to already know

if they really were in on some

grand conspiracy.

I saw emails of Hillary Clinton sharing like Wikipedia articles.

Apparently, Vladimir Lenin was the leader of the Bolshevik party who overthrew the... It was factoids like that

that they would share with each other that you'd think they would already know based on

the level of accredation and education they have to be in the positions they are in.

But when you read, look, a lot of people focus on the Pizza Gate stuff. I have my suspicions. Yeah, something weird is going on there.

I definitely, I do think they're child rapists. I'm not denying that but don't let that confuse you into thinking that these child

rapist pedophiles

Are somehow somehow have a plan for the future of America because they really don't, because

they don't even have a holistic grasp of the reality they live in. They're just

like destiny or Vosh or whoever else you want to talk about in the sense that they're constantly like reading Wikipedia to like

Get informed on basic facts like I would I would read emails between Hillary Clinton and all these other people in the State Department

All these other higher-ups like apparently the Sunni and the Shia have

been in conflict for hundreds of years.

The issue concerns the succession of the leadership of the Umma, the Muslim community.

And it's like, they're typing these things out, paraphrasing Wikipedia articles,

not just Wikipedia articles, this is what's even more pathetic. They would send each other

news articles and quote the news articles, not to be like, oh look what's in the news articles not to be like oh look what's in the

news but to say like look at this new information you didn't know before

they are literal stupid boomers don't take my word for it go on wiki leaks if

it's still up and read the emails for yourself. It's really

pathetic. It's really fucking pathetic how stupid they are, right? And I don't know what's

going on in its entirety in terms of who is running the deep state and what their plan is.

But there's one possibility that I can't brush off which we have to consider and think

about which is that no one is in control.

And what do I mean by no one is in control?

I mean in the strict sense that nobody has a vision

they're trying to implement.

I think that there's different eccentric individuals in the State Department, in the Pentagon, in the CIA maybe, in the FBI, and in their private capacity as individuals have a holistic ideology that they're trying to implement,

but they're facing too many hurdles because of the chaotic, bureaucratic, imperialist machine.

They don't find themselves at the helm implementing some kind of idea.

They find themselves facing an uphill battle just to implement their diabolical evil plans.

For example, Peter Teal. Peter Teal is a guy with ideas, right? He clearly has some kind of idea-based vision for the

future of America. You know, with Curtis Yarvin and the whole, you know, yeah, the N.R.X.

thing and the neocameralism and you know the C-setting and he's

got allies in the Pentagon I mean he's he's he did Palantier contracting with

them but Peter Teal and his followers are just one faction there's other people in the deep state who have a

conflicting vision and it's not a binary thing of like one faction versus the other is the

source of the conflict. It's like probably 12 different factions, right?

And it's all eccentric individuals trying to like get a hold and steer the state in the direction

they want it to go in, but they always fail.

Take Trump's administration. When Trump was elected in 2016 and he was choosing people for his cabinet,

a lot of different people and factions were vying for control there and it's like he had Roger Stone there.

I guess he represents a different faction than Steve Bannon or I don't fucking know and it's like there is so much chaos going on and then even in the GOP

you have Marco Rubio and it's there's all these different factions who have

their own ideas but there's nobody actually in control of the whole thing.

Do you want to know a country where

there is like kind of in a way an idea

or a spirit guiding the whole of society?

China.

China is a society where there is a...

WAA! Sorry, my mic fell. Uh, China is a, uh,

China is a, um, yeah, BAP and I don't fucking all these other people.

Anyway, China is an example of a country where, China is an example of a country

where you can say like there is a vision

that's guiding the whole of the government's decisions.

And there's different factions of course,

and not denying that in China,

but there is a holistic plan of action.

One of them are called the five-year plans, right?

But then there's also Xi Jinping thought.

So in China, it's like there is a sense of purpose, and not just a sense of purpose, but

there's a sense of a vision that needs to be fulfilled.

Another example of a country like that is Russia. Russia's a country where there's a sense of a mission.

There's a sense of a decision the state is making to

fulfill some kind of objective in a holistic way. You don't have that in the

United States. So that's why Russia's subway system, there's not feces and shit

everywhere. It's not because Russians are less poor than Americans. It's because

it's guided by a type of purpose, it's guided by an idea of some kind, where people have to take responsibility

for the state of society, right?

In the open society, no one takes responsibility for society.

The people in power are fucking sending each other emails about different Wikipedia articles over

information that's somehow new to them which begs the question of why they're

even in power in the first place I mean like you're so ill-informed about the

world and yet you have so much power over the world and you're telling

me you're still learning to the point where you're sending each other articles about

like basic history that you should have known as a prerequisite for being able to get in

power, right?

Like the reason I'm making a big fuss over the fact that they basically

don't have basic, a basic understanding of like history and stuff is because when no one is in control, when no one is taking responsibility for the outcome of reality

and for the state of society, and at least in a limited sense, what that means is that

nobody has a holistic grasp of not only the state of the country,

but also its history. I mean, you look at the Tucker Carlson Putin interview and one of the

things that should strike you is Putin's grasp of history. And I talked about this a lot I'm not going to get

into it too much but it's like well the reason he has that grasp of history in

addition to his upbringing with masterclass Soviet education is because it's

like it's a given he's the leader Russia. Of course he has to know everything about

Russian history and in a sense world history at least in a limited sense

He has to know this. He has to know things about this. How could he not know these things?

How could he ever be equipped to make any kind

of major decision if he doesn't know these things, right? You think Putin is sending emails with

oh! It appears today I just found out that as a matter of fact, the

cotton gin was a big part of the expansion of slavery in the United States, culminating

in the events of the civil war. It actually

turns out according to this Wikipedia article that it is said the Republicans and the Democrats are still fighting over...

No, they don't do that. They already have their shit locked down.

They got intelligence agencies collecting information.

You know that shit. They got it locked down.

They don't need to be sending each other emails and

looking up fun facts. To know basic shit. They know the world that they live in and they've made a decision about

their place in that world. That does thatthey've made a decision about their place in

that world. That does that's not true for the United States. We don't know we

don't know the country that we live in. We haven't made a decision as it

pertains to the country we live in. We haven't made the decision that we want a

subway without shit everywhere, right?

And why haven't we made that decision?

We haven't made that decision because we can't.

We can't make that decision.

Because we, as a collective interest, don't even fucking exist.

We're not given any recognition.

It's just an amalgamation of different, arbitrarily private interests competing and conflicting and fighting for control of an extremely outdated, monstrously

bureaucratic, imperialist state machine.

And they're just competing over it, and nobody actually controls it completely. And everyone can point fingers about who's responsible.

Republicans say it can say it's Democrats' fault, Democrats can say it's Republicans' fault,

but the truth is it's no one's fault because nobody is at the helm of the ship.

That's the truth. That's the sad truth about the United States.

There isn't a United States. Nobody's at the helm of this ship.

You know, I'm almost tempted to say sometimes, the conspiracy is out in the open.

Yeah, the bickering that's going on in the Congress and the Senate, that is the extent

of governance in the U.S.

Like, yeah, that's, that's real.

That's the government shutdowns where they can't come to a decision or, yeah, that's actually

real.

Nobody knows what they're doing.

It's all on paper.

It's funny because I have two basic suspicions.

One is this, what I'm just telling you, and the other is the exact opposite, where it's

like, no, they are in control and they know exactly what they're doing.

But I don't think they do.

I increasingly don't think they do.

I mean, I could be wrong.

I'm not saying I know this for certain.

Of course I don't.

But I suspect it could be possible that they don't know what they're doing and if they

don't know what they're doing, that should tell you that one of the roles of communists

should be that we need to be the people who know we're doing, right? We need to be the ones who are the Illuminati in a sense.

We need to be the Freemason Illuminati or whatever the fuck because they're not, you know?

We need to be the ones who have a sense of purpose, a purposeful future.

I think that the forces, I think in a way, it is true that the idea that's animating people in power is a destructive one.

I agree.

I mean, whether it's Marco Rubio's thing, or whether it's Peter Teal, or it's all united

by its basic destructive thrust, or it's like Bill Gates or Soros and the

degrowth, environmental degrowth kind of stuff, reduce the population kind of deal, I mean.

But then you see the World Economic Forum

and then you see, you know, it's kind of scary

because the one place that I feel is united

is corporate America.

It seems like corporate America is fucking United.

When I watch the Super Bowl,

I feel like I am watching people who have an agenda

pushing through their agenda in a holistic unified way, right? When you

watch the Super Bowl you get that impression. All the corporations converging

to push a specific agenda, to push a specific ideology, right? It's very bizarre. It's very bizarre. And then, you know, at the

same time, let me do a self-criticism. Let me do a self-criticism. Hillary Clinton isn't in power.

Of course the politicians don't know what they're doing.

Of course they don't know about basic history because they're not the ones who are in control.

Those are just the pawns.

So of course they're sending each other Wikipedia and not.

They're not the ones who actually are making the decisions, right?

Yeah, corporate America seems locked down in a way, right?

I was, the Super Bowl was crazy, you know, I mean usher who the fuck is usher and

Then I remember on New Year's is Ryan Seacrest New Year's Eve who the fuck is Ryan Seacrest

Why are we stuck in 2008 forever?

We're we stuck in 2008 forever? We're like stuck in like 2010 or 2008 on a time loop.

Corporate America is recycling the same celebrities.

Taylor Swift! Wasn't Taylor Swift a big deal in like 2007?

Who the fuck is Taylor Swift?

Wasn't she a big deal like 50 years ago or some shit?

Corporate America is, it's like an extended Marvel cinematic universe of the same

boring celebrities and brands and corporations and

It's all one big hegemony. It's literally like the Matrix or some shit.

And it's like you watch the Grammys and everyone's there and everyone knows each other and it's all,

you know, what is going on man I don't know about I know who

Leonardo DiCaprio is he was at the Super Bowl I know a few I know about I

know about Shaq was there, Chris Brown I know about him.

But who are these people?

They're all part of like one universe. They're all part of like one corporate

thematic universe.

And it's like, brought to you by Verizon Wireless, Bounty, the best kind of absorbent

toilet paper

shush a charm and

corporate america is

people say this is the epitome of capitalism but it's

seems life it seems like

china has a communist party r Russia has the FSP, and we have some shit going

on.

We got our own shit going on.

I don't know what it is exactly, but it's definitely something that has a

a... it's definitely not a hidden hand controlling the economy, you know, it's more like a open hand, you know, it's more like

something out in the open directing and controlling the economy, the hegemony. It's really the

hegemony, right? I mean, New Year's E. Brto you by Ryan Seacrest. Who that guy from what?

2005?

Who the fuck is that?

I remember when people are like Beyonce and Jay Z are in the Illuminati and I was like,

that's stupid as fuck.

And then I look at the Super Bowl and I'm like, and the Grammys and I'm like, you know what?

That shit might be real because it's like, why is this like one big industry?

People say it's all the same industry.

Why is it the same industry?

Because it's controlled by literally the same people.

The same record companies, the same movie producers,

the same corporations, forming a cartel, controlling all of it.

The same damn people control it. It's not an industry. It's not it's not as

though this is like a community that's been created

because it's just like a bunch of people randomly

Selling the same products. No, this is an in-dut this is a monopoly cartel

obviously

And yeah, there are these weird occult undertones to it that you just can't ignore.

I mean, I don't know how far it goes, but definitely something strange is behind it, you know,

and brought to you by Verizon Wireless, brought to you by Chevy Ford.

There's something about that we need to investigate this kind of new, by the way, this isn't even like my deep lecture,

this is just me bouncing thoughts off of you but we need to do we need to

like come up with like some kind of new art movement no we shouldn't this is

unworthy of art but I would love for the first time someone to mock or at

least represent this like strange 2008 to 2010 or I don't know 2005 to

2010 I don't know exactly how far goes this weird time warp corporate America

time warp where it's like some strange, strange hegemony, the

music industry, Hollywood, the Super Bowl, sports.

Um, just like, give us, make a movie that's not mocking it in a sense of a comedy, but

just like, representing it in some sense of a comedy, but just like representing it in some kind

of way, you know?

I wish we had something like that.

You know, I wish, I feel like I'm the only person who watches the Super Bowl and thinks like it. This is not

2024. This is like

this is a

a version of society that's trying this sorry. This is a

simulation that's trying to convince us that we have never moved past

The late 2000s ever

Even though we have I mean we're in the era of AI. There's a new thing with open AI, by the way, where you can literally type in a prompt and it'll give you a video now. I'm using that.

And actually, one of the things that makes us certain were the avant-garde, one of the

avant-garde political movements of our era, is we're the only people who make extensive

use of AI for our adjut prop. Nobody else does that. The right wing doesn't do it. The so-called leaders of the counterculture, alt-right. The alt-right is dead.

They fucked up in 2016. Even on their own terms. They're dead. They're gone. They don't have an edge. They don't have the edge they think they have.

They just have idiots like Stu Peters, spouting nonsense.

The alt-right thinks it's the cutting edge

because they have free speech on Twitter now. That doesn't make you the

cutting edge. The cutting edge means you're at the cutting edge of history. That's

us now. Okay, it's not you. It's us. We've overtaken them in the capacity of being

the cutting edge. I'll admit in the 2016, you know, as far as

things that people... Yeah, I'm not saying the alt-right was good, but I'm saying that was in

a way ahead of the leftist. It was ahead of the left. And what do I mean by ahead of the

left? I mean in terms of their ability to tap into mass culture and you know the whole

so-called meme magic and the ability to capture the zeitgeist of the era with the rise of social media

and fake news and whatever, right?

That era is dead.

We're in a qualitatively new era of AI, which they're not able to adapt to or adjust

to or adjust to.

Milo Yonopolis! Remember when Milo Yonopolis was like a thing? Yeah, I'm sorry, we're

not living in an era where that's like a thing, all right? 2024 is not 2016 or 2017 for that matter

They're coping. I'm telling you the truth the alt right is dead and they're just coping about it

They're not a thing. They're trying to tell you there's still a thing. We still got it. Where's the whole meme we're so back We're whole meme, we're so back.

We're so back.

Nobody who's back has to say we're so back.

Okay?

You're coping.

You're not back.

You'll never be back.

The fact that you've idealized 2016 and 2017 as your

golden age proves you're never going to return to it because the whole ideology

of the right wing is propping up golden ages so pure and so remote from reality it will never be attained.

Just like a utopia, right?

We need to go back to ancient Gay Reese, where everyone ran around naked, in the forest, and it was only men doing it.

And they were all muscular bodybuilders.

I'm sorry, like, that's what they're doing for 2016 now.

Just like how they romanticize ancient Greece, they're romanticizing 2016.

You're fucking gone, you're out, it's dead! We're the future now, bitch!

They're literally romanticizing 2016.

They think they're the cutting edge.

You're not the cutting edge.

We are.

We are.

We wake up to it or don't.

We don't give a shit.

We're going to overtake you anyway.

Anyway, I'm not going to waste breath rubbing in their faces. I'm just sick of hearing about it

I'm just sick of hearing about it. I'm sick of hearing about

The alt right is we're so back. We're this way you're not shit. you're fucking dead in the water every single

one of them you've lost your whole shit you're trying to get it back you're

never gonna get it back why because you didn't know what you were doing.

2016, it was a vacuum, and these neo-Nazis from the 2000s,

the elders of the neo-nazi movement,

from Storm Front to wherever the fuck they came from, they crammed in

there to get into that vacuum.

But they didn't know what they were doing in the sense of like, they didn't understand.

It was a pure coincidence.

It was a pure accident.

They got, they got, and then you had the Peter Tiel people where it was a pure accident they got they got and then you had the Peter

Teal people where it was being funded but then look what happened Trump filled

his cabinet with neocons and traditional cuck servitives and what happened to the

the based based alt right they Charlottesville

happened and that then they lost all their relevance it's dead it's totally

dead and why is it dead It's totally dead.

And why is it dead, by the way?

Because it was never a thing to begin with.

It was a coincidental false consciousness of that era.

We should have been there in 2016. Had, if infrared was around in 2016, there

wouldn't have been an alt-right. There would have been no alt-right. We would have been

able to surpass in terms of clarity and ability to articulate this new niche, this new vacuum, in terms of popular consciousness

or digital online consciousness, because the mainstream hegemony broke down in terms of the ability for people to make

sense of reality was breaking down, right?

Trump got elected.

Nobody saw that coming.

Just like I told you about the Super Bowl earlier, right?

The Super Bowl, everything's all part of the plan, it's

all part of the plan, Rianna's here, Jay-Z's here, all the fucking celebrities are here, Hillary

Clinton, Obama. Trump wasn't part of the plan in this like matrix simulation. So people found

themselves at a loss for being able to make sense of

reality. By the way, Trump won accidentally. It was like a miracle, right? So the

alt-right came in and tricked a lot of people into thinking, oh the, the, the, the, I'm gonna,

I'm gonna, I'm gonna allow you to understand

this new territory.

You see, the reason you're not able to make sense of reality anymore

is because it's all Jews, and actually Hitler was was right and they're covering it up.

Oh my God!

Yeah, but that failed.

And why did it fail?

Because it's fucking stupid is why.

Why am I saying it's fucking stupid stupid because compare it to Marxism.

And I don't mean dogmatic Marxism. I mean compare it to a minimum,

compare it to the bare minimum of any kind of like scientific appraisal of the new era as a contradiction between the forces of production and the relations of production.

Square 1.

You know?

Like, yeah, what's going on is that there are new technologies, for example,

there are new relations of production

corresponding to the technologies, to the productive forces,

which the superstructure can no longer account for. So square one is how do we account for it?

How do we understand it and appraise it? That's what Marxists do. That's why Marxists last more than a year.

The truth is the alt-right were our era's equivalent of anarchists.

Right? Capitalism in the 19th century always produced anarchists.

Always produced people who unreflexively and spontaneously

wanted to rebel against the system. And then after one year, they were just, they disappeared forever.

I want you guys to appreciate something. Marks and Engels. Let's say they

started out in the early 1840s. And then Engels dies when in the 1890s, right?

Let me actually fact check that.

Yeah, he died in 95.

Okay. Do you know how incredible it is that their specific outlook, their specific theory,

their specific position survived 50 years through the revolutions of

1848, through the Paris commune, through the Franco-Prussian War, through

all of the developments that had, through the the great, the long depression, whatever it was called.

Through Henry George and Georgism, Marxism is the only thing that was robust and survived.

Did you know that? You know, when people say Marxism is dead, you have to laugh.

Because Marx and Engels alone, they had infinitely many anarchistic and socialist contemporaries

who had their own... there is a there is a million Hitler particles surrounding them.

Like, there was Bakunin and there was Prothound, there were all these proto-fascist Hitler-right,

alt-right people, you could call them that, who had their own wacky view of the world, their

own unique perspective, about, you know,

how to rebel against the system. Every possible ideology and outlook you can think of, the utopian

socialists, all of it was there.

And the only ones who survived, the only outlook that survived was Marxism.

And there's a reason for that.

Marxism is robust because it is true, because it's actually true. Because it's actually the truth. It's actually correct.

I mean, really appreciate.

The Paris Commune was led by a guy named Blanquey or whatever. The Blanquist.

Nobody remembers who the fuck that guy is. He fell off. Marxism never fell off. Even to

this day it didn't fall off.

And there's a reason for that, all right? So you have to put the alt-right in that context.

These were idiots, stupid people, didn't know what the fuck they were doing.

They didn't know what forces they were wrangling with, okay?

They were so excited and confident, oh we're so, we got this, we're the true counterculture.

You don't know what the fuck you're doing, you're just the most bare bones spontaneous false consciousness.

The stream broke. Five's in the chat if we're back. Okay, cool. Anyway, you know, kick, I don't know what's going on with it, all right? Anyway. anyway. Why isn't Marxism able to gain currency or communism?

What's the fundamental contradiction we're immediately faced with?

And what's my perspective on this?

Why has infrared come out of nowhere the way it did?

I mean, what context is that coming from?

Well this is what I want to talk about today.

I want to talk about ancient infrared theory.

By ancient, I mean, 2017, let's say to 2019, what fundamental theoretical questions were we wrestling with that we believed

no one else had overcome or sufficiently clarified?

And more or less you can boil it down to the question of the issue of consciousness and

proletarian consciousness. How does proletarian consciousness take root among the masses?

And moreover, what are the masses? What does that even mean? Right?

So the basic thing you're faced with as a Marxist from square one is the fact there are masses of people who hold views contrary to what your theory claims they are disposed

to on account of the material relations of production they're embedded with it.

Many leftists responded to this question in their own ways.

They responded to it, for example, by saying that because American workers were

not disposed to communist ideas, it's because they're settlers, it's because they're white, it's

because they benefit too much from imperialism, it's because they're straight men, it's

because they're cisgendered, it's because they're ably-bodied.

There is a cult origin of the kind of vulgar liberal

wakness. I don't know what else to call it, which, you know, you, there is, there is an

extent in which, um, that has some basis in Western Marxism.

And I'll specifically specify that.

I'm not saying most of it's from Marxism,

I'm saying there is a specific lineage

coming out of the new left

confronted with the question of why the Western working classes were not disposed to socialist ideas or communism

which first explained it in terms of privilege and the privilege was trying to take from Lenin's

theory of the labor aristocracy and apply that to the masses, which is something very unprecedented,

right? Lenin's labor aristocracy was a theory of the

compromise nature of working class institutions from the top down.

Lenin was not saying that at the root there's something wrong with the working class in the West

He's trying to explain why the representatives of the working class sold out

And and why there's this upper strata of the working class

That's holding and propping them up that's

being bribed by imperialist super profits right anyway with the new left you

had something kind of different different. You had people trying to explain why at the root level there's

something fundamentally wrong with the Western working classes. From France to America,

everyone's trying to figure this question out. And the way they did that was

beginning from some kind of theory of their privilege, right? Which is this kind of vulgarization of Lenin.

So first they said they're bribed by imperialism, but this was not adequate to them.

This eventually proved to be inadequate to them. Why did it

why did it prove to be inadequate? Because they realized that with the

process of de-industrialization going on,

based on an objective analysis,

people's standard of living, especially with the arrival of neoliberalism,

was more or less starting to decline.

So they're no longer benefiting from imperialism, observably.

Which is an irony to this in a way. I'll explain the irony is that, you know, like the

standard of living enjoyed by American workers after the post-war period was actually down to the strength of US

manufacturing, meaning US was exporting what 50% of the world's products for

global trade. So that was why they were wealthy. It wasn't because they were

taking things from other countries necessarily.

I know there is still an extraction of raw materials from colonies and whatnot,

but the US originally in the 50s, I'm not saying this to defend the US, I'm just giving you an objective analysis,

was against, in some capacity, the vestiges of European colonialism and try to encourage

Europe to desist from the old colonial model, to transition into neo-colonialism, right?

But anyway, I digress.

Um, eventually they, they had to find all these kinds of different ways to explain why it was not in the material interest of

these workers to come around to proletarian consciousness.

And they increasingly kept finding new things that made them privileged to the point of absurdity.

So one of the first ones was race, right?

They said, okay, it's because you're white.

You're clearly better off than black people.

So because of your whiteness, you're not disposed to revolution.

Because you're white.

What do you have to lose?

You have less to lose.

So that was their quasi-materialist explanation for why their consciousness was not gaining

currency among the masses.

They began by saying you're white. It's because

you're white because you have that privilege. Right? Then that was no longer sufficient. The white

thing was no longer sufficient. So it became, you're a man. I mean maybe the man thing was the

first one. You're a man. You're not a woman.

As a man, you benefit from the system. This is kind of like glorious time. As a man,

you may not benefit from the system completely, but you benefit more than women do, right? But then

that didn't, that was not sufficient because

even women are privileged compared to who, to homosexuals and, and, and, uh, you know,

sexual minorities. Well, that's why these women aren't coming around to it, because they're not gay.

But even the gays are privileged, right? Because at least they're not transgender.

Transgenders have it really bad. So they're cisgender, right? But even that's, even they have it bad, right? So, because

you're still not disabled, you still have legs and arms. So on and on it goes, until they

can find the most wretched, miserable, possible person who has absolutely

no stake whatsoever in the system at all.

And that is the vague relationship between Western Marxism and the leftist madness of the present, present day, right?

But anyway, we didn't buy any of that.

We said there's clearly something wrong with this model. But anyway, we didn't buy any of that.

We said there's clearly something wrong with this model and with this theory.

And why?

Because it can be infinitely applied.

Because it's an infinite regress for one, obviously. And also we understood the class interests

these theories corresponded to. This is kind of new corporate, sanitized grad students

and professionals. You're not fucking underprivileged poor people,

you're a bunch of gentrifier yuppies who for some reason are predisposed to

this outlook. We saw it as inherently corrupt even just on that basis.

Just look at the fucking people espousing it, right?

The oppression Olympics.

Anyway, I'm not here to beat a dead horse and talk about wokeism and stuff.

I'm just here to give you some background on where we were because we were leftists back in the day

We were still we weren't anti

Feminist or anti-LGBT and none of that sort we just didn't buy their specific way of explaining why American workers

Weren't receptive to their ideas. We say maybe there's something wrong with your ideas, right?

Anyway, we had to formulate a basic distinction,

operative distinction, which we're not the origin of. I mean, this is all in Marxism from the beginning.

I'm just saying, we had to rediscover these things, right?

And it's between the organ of consciousness, let's call it reflexivity, and the unreflexive

dispositions of the masses.

And the basic theory is that there will always be some content to reflexivity.

Some kind of forces will be monopolizing the consciousness.

So to basically address the question, well, why aren't working class movements led

by individuals from working class backgrounds?

Well, because in order to develop proletarian consciousness, you need free time that being a proletarian probably

can't afford you.

This is why Lenin said, although there can be proletarian intellectuals, they do so

not as proletarians, but as theoreticians, and they're few and far between. They're not a lot of them, right? That's what he

was writing. And the question was, what is the relationship between the faculty of criticism, critical thought, theory, philosophy, the intellect, right?

What is the relationship between that and the revolutionary aspirations of the masses?

Sorry, not the revolutionary aspirations of the masses, but just the practical reality of

the masses in general.

What's the relationship between the ivory tower and the masses below it? What's the real relationship?

So we basically developed the following view.

The key to achieving proletarian consciousness was a type of accelerationism.

And we were keeping up with the Landian accelerationism and the revival of it and the new trends there.

We weren't very impressed by it.

I've talked about it in the stream before, but to cut a long story short, we thought

there was something salvageable in the logic of acceleration, except not as

the acceleration of technology or the economy necessarily with regard to our critical reflexive faculties, but rather the relationship between the sentiments, moods, orientations, and political dispositions of the masses versus our reflexive critical faculties because you have to understand

after 2016 I think accelerationism the Land kind, received a revival for the wrong reasons.

Landian accelerationism was kind of about the disorienting nature of technology and, you know, globalism and things like that and it was very

prescient for the 1990s, but why did that resonate with people so much in 2016?

I think it was for accidental reasons, right? Trump didn't represent a

huge feat of technological change, okay? Trump didn't really incarnate any kind of

shift in society that's like purely objective in terms of like, you know,

a huge virus or some kind of like rise of machines and I understand there's the rise of social media

and there's that kind of context. But Trump really represented our expectations

being completely falsified, right? He represented the acceleration of this kind of mood in the country, this kind of consciousness, vulgar plebeian consciousness, which

surpassed our ability to give reflexive critical content to it, right? And I

think that's what Trump represented. I'll give you an example of this, right?

The real accelerationist content of Trump in 2016, it wasn't, it wasn't like, oh, this AI hyper-techno-capital from the future is outpacing our ability to rationalize

it and integrate it within a sense of human meeting, it's surpassing the human security system.

It's kind of the contrary.

Trump's vulgar plebeian populism was was accelerating past the ability for the intellectual class to make sense of it and to kind of attribute content to it.

And actually that's why we had Russia Gate. The reason Rachel Maddow and

Democrats and Stephen King had this psychotic meltdown where they started attributing Trump

and his movement to Russia is because there was this kind of total acceleration of the discourse, if you want to call it that,

in terms of what people were talking about, what kind of slogans were gaining currency,

the new outlooks and forms of consciousness

that were taking shape, and like they couldn't make sense of that.

Rachel Maddow couldn't explain the rise of Q&N and like the rise of like, you know, all

these wacky new theories and all

these new like trends and you know build the wall make America great again

the vote and all these you know Trump that the what was really accelerationist about Trump

Was when he called you know

When you would like call people names like how do you even respond to that?

It's accelerating past your ability to respond, okay? So how do you make sense of that? You have to attribute it to something like Russia.

I mean, oh my God, Russia is interfering in our elections and that's

why RussiaGate was was was so persuasive among liberals, right?

Because it's almost like liberals were Marxists.

I'm not saying they were Marxists, but there's an analogy here.

It's almost like liberals were Marxists,

and here they are,

trying to like, feel like the masses reflect your consciousness.

Like, okay, America is this progressive, Obama consciousness, whatever, and then suddenly

the masses defy your expectations so radically in terms of Trump

And you just can't keep up you can't keep up you can't keep up you can't make sense of it

You can't attribute it within your own intellectual framework, within

the framework of your own consciousness. You have no way of explaining its causes. How

could racial mad at all explain why Trump was elected in 2016, why the MAGA movement came to be be how do you make sense of that? How do you rationalize it?

How do you you don't even have time to do it. It's happening in real time and you don't

Have any hold over it. You have no reflexive

Let's call it reflexive hold over it. You have no reflexive, let's call it reflexive edge over it, right?

So people need to understand, like that's a crucial context to why accelerationism started to gain currency again. But again it was like completely

farcical in a way because Landian acceleration was precisely what couldn't

explain this either. Landian acceleration was talking about some kind of

relationship between the human security system and this kind of, you know,

positive feedback loops which are monstrously inhuman. But in the case of 2016, you clearly have a struggle within humanity.

You have something all too human. It's almost like Maga, they're too human. They're too ape-like and

monkey-like. They're too vulgar and stupid and all of the smart intellectuals

are so humiliated. And it's like there, there's like an ape escape, not from the human

security system, but from the Rachel Maddow safe space system.

It's not the human security system that's being defied in 2016.

It's the corporate liberal HR department that's being defied not by some hyper-intelligent AI

but by these stupid monkey masses

stupid plebs

Who are so uneducated they don't even have college education and yet they take

over the country. And you know there's a kind of analogy you can draw or a

comparison even with what happened in the culture revolution in China actually.

Like, that's what Mao did.

Mao got all the country bumpkins, so confident

with the quotations of Chairman Mao,

talking down to engineers

and like Soviet-educated intellectuals

and physicists and like, educated intellectuals and physicists and like trained glasses wearers.

And it's kind of like that's what was going on in 2016 in a way, right?

Anyway, why am I talking about this? Because we were observing this reality and trying

to make sense of it ourselves. And we weren't pro-Trump at this time at all. As a matter of fact, we thought Trump was providing crucial ingredients to the growth of a fascist movement. We thought there was a fascist specter looming on the horizon.

And we thought, how do we defeat it? Well, we have to understand

it first. We have to understand what's going on, right? Anyway, so we were confronted with

the basic contradiction between like the unreflexive movement of the masses.

Let's call it MAGA, right, or whatever you want to call it, versus the faculty of reflexivity.

The prevailing consciousness, guiding the masses, that's the contradiction that struck us as the most important.

And for us, there was an accelerationist dynamic.

Um, and the form of acceleration wasn't capital, as Nick Land envisioned it.

It was more kind of like, there's this relationship between unleashing the revolutionary potential

of the masses and of the masses and

accelerating the faculty of the intellect and criticism. It's almost like if you bring

Enlightenment to its conclusion,

you know culminating not simply in Hagel but in an extremely reflexive position, like Deluz and Lacan and these French incomprehensible ivory tower theorists.

You go so far in the direction of isolating yourself from the masses

and purely focusing on the intellect,

the faculty of reflexivity and criticism, right?

That will liberate extremely explosive revolutionary potentials and energies among the masses.

How? Because the idea was that basically the consciousness

of the masses was being held in these kinds of corrupt fortresses of reflexivity.

Um, what is the fortress of reflexivity?

It's basically an idea that becomes so crystallized, a prejudice that becomes so crystallized and

becomes reinforced by reality itself because people make a living off of

propagating it, right?

People who are paid for a living to control

our consciousness, to define our consciousness. Universities, for example, right?

We very clearly understood there's a dynamic here of the town in the country,

the mental and physical, right? The urban versus the rural. That's how we initially appreciated

its significance. We had no background in Maoism originally.

We didn't.

We didn't, it's not like we had experience in Maoist organizations.

We didn't.

We were confronted with the significance of Maoism and Cambodia because of how we understood the meaning of the urban rural distinction.

Urbanism crystallizes, this is our primitive view, it's not correct, urbanism in our view, a specific form of urbanism, of urbanity,

crystallized a specific threshold of ideology, a specific prejudice with regard to the world, right? This

stupidity becomes adopted by the masses as the limited extent of their consciousness. If we could somehow

subvert and undermine the institutions of the intellect by doing an

independent kind of ruthless criticism of all that exists, we could actually liberate the masses from the limited

form of their reflexivity.

And the masses refers to what? All the masses refers to what?

All the masses refers to is an undefined extent of subjectivity and humanity.

That's what masses means, right?

This is why I think white nationalism and the right-wing nationalism and right-wing populism, for that matter, as an ideology at least, is really fucking stupid.

Because think about this notion of like, okay, we are white identity nationalist.

Then why are you a fucking nationalist?

What is tangible in your view about a nation?

Because you're saying, well, I don't believe in, you know, just communist stuff.

I think that white people should just stick together because white people are tangible.

It's not tangible. Okay? You want to go to the fucking conclusion of right-wing thinking,

go to Einrand or some shit. Only the individual is tangible by that logic, right?

It's so stupid, like, yeah, I'm a white nationalist. But a nationalism, a populism predicated on a strict delimitation of identity is incompatible

with mass politics.

Mass politics is about a lack of definitiveness of identity, right?

You call them the masses. You don't call them Joe, Bob, Larry, and Michael, and, you know, John and Eugene.

You say the masses because it's an undefined extent of people. It's an

undefined content. The content is undefined. You don't, you're not preempting it with an identity, right?

And institutions most of all preempt the masses with the form of an identity.

If you undermine the institutions, this was our view,

you subvert and bypass these institutions,

then you can free the masses from the limited form of their identity and truly allow them

to be masses, pure masses.

This is where there's most of all probably the Landian influence.

What's not, we were, we liked his capitalist economic. No,

we didn't care about that. For us, the true accelerationism was unleashing the pure, pure form

of the masses. Thethe pure masses, masses untainted and unblemished by a specific

identity, masses as such, the pure, you know, masses as masses, undermining and overthrowing every fixed identity, right?

So we were still left this, basically, but it was some pretty hardcore shit.

Anyway, this view is completely wrong.

But I'm just telling you like we were from the get-go beginning from a very unique perspective

Reflexive institutions in the form of let's's say, the professional managerial class,

people who are paid for a living.

And this is why we considered it corrupt, by the way.

We considered all classes defined by mental labor

as inhibiting the revolutionary energies.

P. Fives.

Where did I leave off? The real masses.

Holy shit!

Holy fuck! Five minutes is gone.

Yeah, we were beginning from a very unique perspective.

Yeah, I'm not going to repeat myself. Fuck that.

Fuck that.

I'll just conclude it. We were completely wrong but I'll explain why.

All right? It was a completely wrong position, but it was still a unique perspective.

Why it was, we discovered it was was wrong was because the institutions preempting, let's say, the form of the masses, were not the only things giving form to the masses.

There was an objective form of the masses that's not preempted by institutions,

giving them, so this was how we eventually came to the dialectical outlook and perspective.

It's not just a pure content or a pure form.

It's a dialectical relationship between the two that's actually materially objective.

So, for us, we have to reckon with the fact that institutions are not preempting the national character of the masses.

Institutions are not preempting, for example, the specific culture of the masses.

On the contrary, institutions are the ones that want to be universal, pure

content of some kind, pure negation. It's the masses that are clinging to particulars. Not particulars in the

form of identities, mind you. This is why

white nationalism in the right wing is fucking retarded. But a particular, a

particular character, a particular culture, a particular way of life, a

particular national character.

Leftist would have you believe that all of these things are just crystallizations of ideas

and prejudices, but we could see from investigating it, again, without any prejudiced commitments, that this was not true.

There is something about the qualitative, particular nature of the masses that was integrated

with them at the level of their material way of life, their material relations, reproduced

from the bottom up, not preempted by institutions crystallizing their

prejudices, but reproduced by material reality itself. So this notion of uninhibited masses is somewhat one-sided.

We extended this analysis far beyond realizing even the state has a material basis.

The state is not just what it was described as in Engels's origin of the family. That's the Athenian state.

That's the Western state. There's an objective unity of the people, an objective form of sovereignty,

an objective power, integrated materially in a way continuous with the real material

life of the people rather than something contrived by ideas enforced by institutions.

And we considered corrupt any class

that was defined by mental labor.

Why? We wanted to accelerate the faculty of criticism and the

faculty of the intellect to its uninhibited conclusion, the ruthless

criticism of all that exists, as Mark said. We wanted to do this. We realized the corruption of the intellectual

class. When your way of life is defined by being paid to be a grad student or being paid

to enforce a certain perspective or a certain narrative, you are not sufficiently

open to the possibility of criticism, a ruthless criticism and a holistic view of reality. You have a now you have muddied the faculty of

the intellect with the filth of some kind of private interest. Meaning you're not

saying this is true because it's true, you're saying that because you're getting paid to fucking say that.

For example, you get the idea?

So all of these communities and cultures created by intellectuals, let's call them intellectuals, or let's call them ideal mental laborers,

we wanted to blow that all up. We despised it and hated it, the university, the academia.

And we believed that proletarian consciousness could only be formulated independently, outside of the institutions.

But in the institutions.

But in the process, we

we did not appreciate that those institutions were not the only things giving form to the masses.

There's also a, um,

pre-reflexive content of the masses. In other words, let's call it an unconscious, right? An unconscious has particular content in it, right?

It's not like a pure form or a pure smooth space, as maybe DeLuz would put it.

It's not like a pure, un uninhibited plane of imminence.

There are specific symptoms in the unconscious.

And this also holds true for the masses.

There's a specific character and historical character and quality of the masses. There's a specific character and historical character and quality of the masses.

And we learned this was basically fast forward a lot. We discovered Marxists already knew this.

This is exactly what Stalin was talking about. When he's talking about the

national traditions of the people, the need to preserve those, need to preserve the integrity

of history itself. Boris Groys wrote about it in the total art of Stalinism, but the...

All of Marxism and Leninism, like this, suddenly made sense to us.

I don't know, when I say suddenly, I mean over the course of like a year or two, right?

But like, we started to really get it. We started to really understand what it was really about right?

Just by focusing on that distinction

And like why we were receptive to this idea of a professional managerial class wasn't because we cared. I never read Barbara Ehren Reich or whoever the fuck she was in my life.

I just knew there was a specific

class of mental laborers who were being paid to reinforce dogmas and ideas and how their institutional culture was shaping their outlook and limiting its ability

to actually account properly for reality.

While dismissing arrogantly and snobbishly, everyone who comes

outside of the confines of the institution. For example, if you don't use their

language and talk like they do, you're an idiot. Haas is an idiot because he doesn't talk like these university professors.

He doesn't, you know, use the exact formalities to bluff about how accredited he is.

Therefore, everything he's saying is meaningless.

Look at President Sunday and how he treated me in our debate.

It's a perfect example of this arrogance,

this veneer of the intellect,

which is actually a mockery of the faculty of the following, right?

Marxism has always been burdened with the question of the relationship between consciousness and the masses.

Between people who are educated and people who are uneducated. Marxism requires

education, something working-class people at the outset do not have. That's a

problem. They're not just going to spontaneously become communist. So all of Marxist history is about thinking about this

difference, trying to overcome it. I mean real Marxism did overcome it. That's

Leninism, Mao and so on, but we in the West didn't, because we haven't thought it through properly enough, I suppose.

The translation error I talked about, how Marxism-Leninism was never translated into the West.

But when you think about it, what I call, let's call it, um, let's just call it the urban apparatus which filters the unreflexive moods, ways of life, outlooks, whatever, translates the unconscious into some kind of conscious

interpretation and content, right? That's what the glasses wearers do. That's what universities

do. That's what, but even in ancient history, that's what universities do, that's what, but even in ancient history, that's

what the first urban, forms of urbanism were doing, with the first, you know, temples

and priests, it's like, they are interpreting through mental labor reality.

And it's like there's this discontinuity between the reality of the masses

and the thought which gives content to them or the content of them accessible

by thought.

That can be accessed by thought.

There's an unconscious and there's a conscious realm, right?

You guys don't know what the fuck I'm talking about.

I should have actually scripted this lecture.

It's all right.

You guys are fucking getting distracted talking about nonsense.

It's pathetic.

It's all right. All I wanted to say is, with the rise of information, the information age,

and cybernetics, this function of urbanism has become decentralized.

Information, to put it in plain speech,

has become universally accessible to anyone, even a factory worker, a truck driver or a construction worker.

The need for intellectual gatekeepers who wear glasses is is gone

Even on the you know there's a moral dilemma to this question too the masses are bad the masses can be racist

the masses can be anti-Semitic. How do you properly educate them into enlightenment?

And it's like, this is the wrong...

The whole paradigm of enlightenment is completely warped and idealist.

But the rise of communication technologies like the internet and information technologies like the internet

has allowed it so that somehow the consciousness of society.

It's almost like when Elon Musk tries to say some shit,

like Twitter is like this hive mind, universal consciousness

of the whole world, and it's not stupid and naive what he's saying,

but the kernel of truth in there is it's like

there is this now decentralized ability for people to make sense of reality in ways which are not just unreflexive bursts of passion and instinct as in the past

with mobs of peasants going on pogroms in the Middle Ages, you know, like killing a bunch

of Jews or whatever.

But is, is like like the ability for our reality to be mediated by information.

It's what media means, by the way, right?

Social media has become decentralized.

The need for the sharp division between mental and physical labor, in terms of the movement, in terms of creating a communist or socialist movement,

that has become overcome to a huge extent.

And I think people should appreciate that. You know, historically speaking, the gatekeepers of information are no longer able to gatekeep,

right? Paul Potts vision has been achieved in a way. The

glasses wearers have been overthrown, but they have been overthrown by a

peasant with a pickax bashing them over the head.they've been overthrown by the computer, by the smartphone, by social media.

That's what has overthrown them and their privileged role.

And I mean, like, one of the reasons, I mean, we're here. privileged role.

And I mean, like, one of the reasons, I mean, we're here. I mean, I've created, in a limited sense, a mass,

it's not a mass movement in the proper sense, but it's like a mass phenomenon on the internet, I've created one, I've participated in creating one.

So have you?

We really did realize a very obscure theorizing we were doing that had people would when people would hear us or they would talk to us that what the hell are you on?

It's you're on some crazy. It's so far removed from reality. What are you even talking about? And it's like, well, look at infrared.

We actually did it. We've put our theory into praxis. The first step, the first step.

The first step is not like creating in the real world a mass movement for us. The first

step for us was just proving we could make world a mass movement for us. The first step for us was just

proving we could make this a mass phenomena and we fucking did make it a mass

phenomena. I mean holy shit nobody else was able to do this. We put our theory into practice, high-level information theory, high-level

communications theory. We put it into practice, and here is this actual mass phenomena.

What is a mass phenomena? It means, I don't know how many people are in infrared.

It's not a membership thing. It's like, it's a mass phenomena. And not just in terms of

there's a lot of people, but in terms of the barrier to entry isn't that large.

People can start fucking with infrared just by repping our shit and talking like us and joining with us.

And there's a fluidity there at the outer edges of our movement where some people will flip

flop back and forth with other shit.

But it's like we're, that's why it's undefined.

Every mass movement is undefined.

You know?

Every mass movement, a mass move, the difference between a mass movement and

let's say an institution is that an institution has defined parameters to be part of this

institution, you have to meet certain credentials

right but a mass movement has an undefined extent of barrier to entry it's a

mass movement we don't know all the fucking people who are associating with this phenomena.

It's bringing all these people together in ways that we can't control.

That's what a mass movement means, right?

You guys aren't an experiment, by the way, but it's like

Infrared was an experiment and it was an experiment that

Turned into something even we couldn't foresee right I'm not saying we foresaw all of this

and you're all part of our art project.

I'm just saying our theory would turned out

to be fucking true, you know?

About how this shit works, if you guys remember in the OG infrared days, we had the law of the gatekeepers, right? There's a reason why I was able to understand how that shit worked.

Um, and I'm telling you this because in preparation for our upcoming organization, you're going to feel that theory applied again, learning from infrared itself.

You know, you're going to see how it's not like an organization you've ever been in ever the extent to which it's decentralized is crazy

People are people are asking the mods hey tell Haas rain or shea

Is starting a Draco thing to do takiyaa and infiltrate the infrared org and I'm like

I don't think you understand what this org is supposed to be about it's decentralized

He can do that and he can try and see what it's what's going to happen and how many people will be persuaded by that. I doubt it's going to work

But whatever if's going to work.

But whatever, if he wants to overthrow infrared or something, I mean, you have, I'm, debate me, you know? Anyone who wants to do that, I'm out here in the open, you know, there's no need for,

worrying about that. I don't even know what Draco is, I don't know what it is, I don't care.

It's like, that's not what this is.

I'm not creating the KKE, I'm not creating the Caleb Mop and CPI where

I'm going to be ordering you guys around directly it's not going to be like

that I'm really excited about how the relationship between ideas and practice and between education and lack of

education is going to be explored in ways that haven't been explored before.

You know, it's not going to be Haas-Aldin,

you know, being your dad. I'm not going to be your dad. Okay? This this thing, this

org we're launching, it's not going to be me as your dad

You're gonna have to fucking do it for yourself

You know you have to figure it out by yourself.

I'm going to give you advice. I'll help you with advice. You can ask me for help in terms of, you know, what do you think or what's your view on this? Sure, but I mean, we're going to have guidelines too. It's not going to be a free for all, but I'm saying like, you know,

you're going to be experimenting with reaching the masses.

And I'm not going to be an institution

that's going to preempt your ability, the extent of your ability to do that.

You're going to be experimenting with it, but it, but, but let's make no mistake because some people make this false equivalence.

There's always going to be a difference between the organization and the masses.

They're never going to be one in the same thing. Never. Thank you, Anonymous.

Appreciate you. Take it from an old man. It's just the old Marxist-Leninist-Tendency

Reborn. You guys remind me of the guys in their 80s back in the 1980s that taught me. Thank you so much man I appreciate that a lot and I believe you. I mean

When we called ourselves Marxist-Leninists off the bat

Many many years had passed for us to be truly convinced of that

We didn't just say it for no reason. We really did embrace Marxism,

Leninism as the truth. But the difference between us and other self-proclaimed

MLs is that we didn't want to adopt an ML aesthetic because of the aesthetic.

We actually did independently discover the

truth of Marxism-Leninism without being in any way predisposed to it in terms of, you know,

I want to be friends with this person, I want to be in this org, I want to like have this degree of popularity.

It wasn't a social gesture to other leftists that were making.

It was actually like, holy fuck, this is what Stalin was talking about, and he was actually right.

He was actually completely spot on.

There is a wisdom here that no one in the West has ever been able to translate,

and we finally did it.

And it's like, that's where it came from.

This lecture was extremely I you know in my head it was going to come out a lot better than it did.

But I think a big reason is like, by the time I started the lecture I kind of was already a little tired.

Um...

What gives form to the masses to the people?

Is the national form an idea? Is that just an idea?

That has been crystallized and reinforced by a material reality or

does it reflect

a materially objective material form of reality? Is there something materially at stake in it?

And in our view,

the latter is the case. There is a dialectic of content and form.

And that dialectic is material. To us, that's the main contribution of Marxism-Leninism, by the way.

Because the Western Marxist view, that's the main contribution of Marxism-Leninism, by the way. Because the Western Marxist view is that form is just the realm of ideas.

There's a pure content, there's pure material content, and then there's forms which are actually just ideas. This is

basically spinosism, right? Spinosa's substance is the supreme content of all

reality. He calls it the substance. All ideas are just attributes of the substance.

In other words, all forms are just configurations of the same content and substance.

But the Marxist-Lenin's view rejects that. It says actually form is at stake.

Not only form is at stake in content, material content is at stake in form.

And also, this is kind of what my book is about, form is not just the idea and it's

not just, it's not derivative of the logos. Form even isn't maybe an inadequate term.

Lacan explores how preceding the definitiveness of identities

and the consistency of forms you have symptoms. Symptoms.

Within the realm of cybernetics, another way symptoms are explored is

what is his name Weiner, Norman Weiner, whatever the fuck his name is?

Norbert Weiner, I'm an idiot, what's his name? Norbert, Norbert Weiner, okay?

Norber, I'll call him Weiner because it's funny.

Weiner, and his notion of negative feedback,

which is kind of like similar to Lacan's symptom

in a way, the negative feedback, right?

And cybernetics gives us this notion of form, let's look it up, this notion of form which

departs in many ways from the classical platonic notion of form as a definitiveness of idea or identity.

Right?

Take this notion of homeostasis, which is what negative feedback loop refers to.

The form in question would be the homeostasis of, you know, the body

temperature, right? But this homeostasis is not maintained on the basis of an identity or

on the basis of some kind of idea of itself, a form, a fixed form. It's rather

based on this kind of contradictory relationship of negative feedback, where

when the temperature increases, the cooling process

decreases it to return it.

When it, the body temperature decreases, the heating process activates to return it, right?

And then this leaves us with a homeostasis,

which is defined purely by the consistency of these processes

out of which it arises as something consistent.

From something contrary to it.

This is kind of like very dialectical, right?

The regulated temperature is not maintained

by the form of that temperature.

It's maintained by a specific processual relationship

that acquires a symptomal consistency in the Lacanian

sense.

And this is what allows us to kind of understand Marxism-Leninism better in a way, right?

In terms of the dialectic of content and form.

The nation or the civilization that I always talk about, it's more like this,

a homeostasis produced by negative feedback. It's not an idea. It's not a

it's not a identity. It's more like this, right? It's a specific thing whose determination is based

on a specific, specific relationship of opposites, right? So, food for thought.

And of course, yeah, machine learning rests upon this principle.

So we have an interesting convergence of contemporary AI technologies with this new advanced

outlook of Marxism that I'm talking about in.

It comes full circle because

because AI is primarily how we create adjut prop

and we create a theme to our movement, right?

Well, that's form and content coming together.

The content of infrared's vision

through the form of AI, which is kind of things coming together,

if you think about it, right?

Anyway, just some food for thought. Um.

I'll see you guys Sunday.

I do want to come back to her.

I might start streaming easing into

streaming more regularly. Next time I'm streaming is going to be Sunday but after

Sunday I might stream Tuesday so we might have Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday and

that's how I'm going to gradually balance finishing my book with getting back into a regular streaming schedule.

Anyway, guys, I hope that was at least some food for thought, right?

See you guys.