IRAN WAR UPDATES | INTENSE DEBATES

O...

O...

O...

O...

O... oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh The star is bright All the cosmos

aging thing

The star is bright, horizon red, the blade is swift, and horses tread.

All the cosmos is seen in pain, Allah wasma scene in pay, God God Cosmos Libra God

Cosmos

Sini

Pramovda's way

for us to

heed

Revolutionary

dynasty dynasty Allah Allah revolutionary dynasty

Allah cross-movieged in New

Allah-Ahem-

Allah-Kostis-i-i-hah-ha-Kha-Kha-Kha-Kha-Ki-i-i-i

and Allah-Raw-Kov-Kiiiiiii Godopo Skiy in Say Babylon

Pah In Babylon, to Lenin's fight, the earth has turned and within my mind.

Allah POSOS GISHIN praying, Allah

Cosmos Shingi Tending, Allah God blesses in pain Allah God blessesian pain

Allah God blessesim

Hey

Yeah

Yahya Yahya

Yeah

I'm

Yeah Yeah all right all yah

you're

God

God God, yeah, oh, yeah, oh, yeah. Allah cosmos, jenpe,

Allah,

God,

cosmos,

jimpe,

Allah,

God, God, God, God, God,

God,

God,

God, Allah, God, Baja Havala Havon Ava Ava

Ava Ava Ackon Godla! Godla! I'm a lot! You know,

I'm not going to be a Oh, Oh,

Oh God Avasmosid in

Pen

Alaphas

Miphas

Mipi Dimp

Alaw Maw the star is changing big the star is bright

the blade is swift and horses tread oh la cosmos seen in pay allah

bosomish in pain allah post living in pain Allah God God's

God's God God God

God God God God God God

God God God God

God God God God God God God's Way Godosmosmosis in peace Allah Khadda's way

for us to heed

Your revolutionary

dynasty

Yeah

Allah Khallah Khadmohmohsi

Mipi us in allah cross

people

God

God God God God God

God

God God God God God God God God

God

God God God

God God God God God God God God God God God God God God have a postage in pain A lot of those post

people

In bed

Babylon

to Lenin's fight

The earth

has turned

and within

light.

Allah Rospo

Sidi-in-Taining

Allah-propos

Sidi-in-a-Ni-i-in-a-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha Oh! Oh! Oh! Oh!

What are you? I don't know

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm going to I'm

a

I'm going

I'm going I'm going I'm going to

I'm going to

I'm going to I'm I'm I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be.

I'm

I'm

I'm

a I don't know. I don't know.

I don't know. and the I'm going to be I'm

a lot of

I'm

a and I'm gonna be a lot of me and a lot of nothing else

I'm gonna go and I'm gonna get a man who are the next to the very

I'm gonna be a man who

and a man I'm a lot of

the same

I'm

a Oh, my name is my name

I'm gonna

I'm I'm

I'm

I'm

I'm not

I'm

I'm What is up, y'all? What is up, y'all?

What is up, y'all?

What is up, y'all? What is up, y'all? What is up, y'all?

Hey, guys, I have a lot of things to talk about.

First thing I'm talking about is my beard.

I'm looking a little scruffy, and I'll tell you why.

All right, you see this shit?

My barber, he took a, he took an electric trimmer.

He cuts a line right here.

He says, bro, stop shaving it down like this. Shave a line right here. He says, bro,

stop shaving it down like this.

Shave it up to here.

Sparrow, what's up?

So basically,

I got to grow this shit out.

But it looks like a ball sack and shit, right?

So,

sorry. Anyway, I just, right? So, sorry.

Anyway, I just wanted to

like apologize for that.

Anyway, guys,

uh,

we have a lot to talk about.

There's some interesting, lesser

updates will save.

I am going to have a creative confront the chairman this stream.

I'm actually going to give you guys something I've never given you before ever is democracy.

Okay.

So ones if you want a traditional confront the chairman. It's going to be on TikTok either way.

One's if you want it traditional style where it's adversarial. Two is if you would prefer more of an ask me anything type of thing. I actually enjoy the TikToks. I enjoy responding to questions.

I feel like they're just more...

Here's why.

Here's why.

No, I'll tell you why.

I feel like if I do more of an ask me anything,

hostile people will show up anyway,

and I'll give them the chance to debate.

It's just that I feel like in the absence

of people who want to debate and be hostile,

we could still actually just end up having a pretty

informative educational stream.

Plus, I don't know what the fuck people

need to know, honestly. Sometimes, I mean, I'm going to have, I don't know what the fuck people need to know, honestly.

Sometimes, I mean, I'm going to have, I'm going to

talk about something pretty important today.

But I don't always know, like,

I don't always know, like, at what levels

y'all are at, and if there's

things that are, like, boggling your mind and you just want

some clarification on it i know we're supposed to do the patreon q and aes um well this will be a version

of that in a way right and it's just in just in the absence of people who don't have the

boss of debate, maybe I think we're living in a different age, honestly. I feel like the next,

the generation that came after me or my generation, I'm kind of on the border, they're kind of

less confrontational when you think about it.

And their way of doing conference...

You got to ease people in.

You got to ease people in.

Will Eddie be there?

You know what?

I'll ask him right now.

I didn't plan for him, too, but I don't want to...

I don't want to force...

If he's just chilling and relaxing, I don't want to...

I don't want him to have to go out of his way.

I'll just ask him,

I say,

yo, All right.

So, yeah, I told him.

Yeah, but I honestly, I think that the, I think I'll probably, I don't know, guys, I'm kind of at the point where every single stream that I do, I want to do the TikToks like at the tail end.

I enjoy them.

I feel like they're fruitful.

I feel like they're productive.

I feel like they're educational.

And I remember when we started infrared, I was kind of on that

energy where I would just be sitting here asking people's questions about shit, answering people's

questions. And it just led to higher rates of literacy, you know?

Plus, it helps grow the TikTok, you know, which is a dead...

I don't have anything on TikTok.

I have, like, nothing.

All right, y'all, so...

I don't know if you know what's going on, guys.

But, so, okay, where do we begin?

So to draw some threads together that I've been dangling, so to speak.

Since I came back from Russia, I told you guys about something hilarious, which was that the DHS was defunded.

And therefore, I wasn't given a hard time at customs.

I think that's my theory of why.

So when I came back from Russia, I was thinking, oh, my God, I'm going to be kept for hours, maybe up to a day.

You know, I just came back from Russia.

Oh, my God. And I just hung out with Chris Halali the scary guy

and Jackson

Hinkle the wanted international terrorist

criminal anti-Semite Nazi

Tulsi Gabbard agent who

works for Russia, China, Tulsi Gabbard

the CIA, and the bigotry police who are bigots.

They're just, they're like, you know, the man, you know, like transphobic people in suits and ties and shit, right?

Because that's really how it works.

So I thought it was going to be a big problem, but it turns out it wasn't because

the DHS was defunded.

Turns out it's still defunded, and therefore the TSA is defunded.

And at airports across the country, people, I mean, the lines are crazy.

Travel is, this is like logistically going to be a problem.

I'm going to be in St. Louis next month.

I'm going to be in a lot of places next month, actually. I'm going to be a problem. I'm going to be in St. Louis next month. I'm going to be in a lot of places next month, actually. I'm going to be traveling.

I don't fucking know how that's going to work.

I'm going to New York in May,

by the way. Going to New York City.

For all those who are,

Haas, why don't you come to New York? I'm coming. I'm coming to New York City for all those who are... Haas, why don't you come to New York?

I'm coming.

I'm coming to New York.

Anyway, I'm coming to New York.

But we have all these travel plans for this year.

And travel is being heavily obstructed because of the government shutdown regarding the TSA and the lines are crazy at airports across the country.

I'm just saying that. They're crazy.

So, what's my theory, though?

Why am I talking about this?

As if it's relevant and if it's topical.

Well,

I think I'm a conspiracy theorist a little bit.

And I want to say maybe they're doing a test run

to see how the nation reacts to the widespread inconvenience and later

first inconvenience and later in accessibility altogether of regular flight travel across the country.

In preparation for, and this is going to be something I want to talk about in extent of detail,

the upcoming energy crisis is a consequence of the war in Iran.

This is very serious, and I don't know why people underestimate it, and I talked about it today in my post, where I said this is going to lead effectively. All world history right now looks like it's going in the direction of a new dark ages.

Now, when I say new dark ages, a lot of people are super confused.

Because they're just like, what do you mean?

You think things are just going to get really ugly and really bad and really gruesome and really... No, I, yes, actually, but I mean something a little bit more specific by the technical term dark ages which

requires me to go give kind of an extensive lecture on or basically an

outline of my understanding of the history of civilizations and the

different vectors of development in the world history of Eurasia and of world civilization.

I say Eurasia, this tendency could have propped up elsewhere and in other places, but there's only one place for certain.

I can confidently say we've had dark ages, which is Eurasia, right?

So what is a dark age? What is that exactly? So first of all, let's anticipate and be frank about what's happening, some of which I've talked about.

I talked about after I came back from Russia and I heard about reports coming from the front

lines, I just talked to people and they were telling me what's going on, basically,

and why the front has stalled like it's never

stalled before actually like in ways it hasn't before and the reason the front in don bass and

ukraine has basically stalled is because the fpv drones have made the operational deployment and movement of military personnel and vehicles and infrastructure impossible.

Cheap drones can just blow up tanks worth tens of thousands.

Okay, $100 drones can blow up a fucking tank worth $100K, okay?

This creates an economically unfeasible and just impossible environment to operate on if you're a conventional military.

And I talked about how this is leading to a new kind of military point of view and logic of,

we have to start treating electrical and energy grids as very much more relevant factors of warfare than before, meaning we need to take control and be able to shut down at will entire energy and electrical and communications infrastructure that these FPV drones actually depend upon.

There's fiber optic drones, there's all these other kind of drones.

The drones are making warfare.

Conventional warfare, by the way, used to be gas powered and never used to be electric.

Okay?

The use of electronics and warfare, of course, became vital in the Cold War period.

But if we're talking about World War II

and you know

we're still kind of within the paradigm

of heavy gas

machine powered

military infrastructure

and the electronic infrastructure is just kind of like this extra layer of control that's added to these otherwise quite simple, you know, diesel, gas-fueled machines, okay, tanks, airplanes, helicopters, armored carriers, armored vehicles,

and so on and so on. So this is a much more base layer of military infrastructure.

The Cold War added electronics in warfare, mainly as these kind of secondary control systems that were used to guide the more kind of conventional, fortist-aged military infrastructure, right? So if you're following me,

that's the story so far as far as the status of electronics within warfare.

And that's been the case, okay?

Most military infrastructure created by the military industrial complex in both the United States and Russia

is still following the paradigm where electronics are a kind of secondary layer added on top of a more kind of archaic machines, basically, tanks, missiles, aerial combat vehicles and so on and so on.

And don't even wrong, I mean,

the very sophisticated technologies

we're talking about here, but ultimately

it's run by an engine

that's fueled by gas,

and it blows

shit up. It's used to just blow things up

with gunpowder and so on and so on.

Conventional explosive devices, whatever.

So the entire military industrial complex, both in Russia, the United States and the world at large, basically rests upon that premise.

Now, why am I so confident that the ladder of escalation as a consequence of the dynamics of the Ukraine war are basically going to lead to a scenario where we're going to start it's going to start

becoming easy to take out electrical grids and it's going to basically change the nature of

civilization itself so the rise of FPV drones and drone technologies did create a game changer, which is that these are deadly military hardware that is entirely electronic.

Drones, to my knowledge, are electronic.

They're not powered by gas.

The larger ones, I actually don't know.

Let me look this up right now.

Are Shaheed's

fully electronic

no they're not

they use a gas powered

combustion engine fair enough

but the smaller drones

and the FPV drones a lot of them are just purely electronic.

And these are cheap, sometimes Chinese, cheaply mass-manufactured electronic devices that are much cheaper, I think.

Which are very, which don't cost a lot of money okay they don't use a lot of

gas though okay good so you're talking about the you know um drones that cost a few hundred bucks

maybe a few thousand dollars, which can quite very easily take out very expensive military hardware.

So the economics of it is very simple. It's not viable. If you're the military industrial complex and the state is out of its budget paying top dollar, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands for armored carriers and vehicles and tanks and pickup trucks, whatever.

Even helicopter...

I don't know if drones have taken out helicopters.

I'm probably sure they have.

At least disrupted them.

You know, very cheap electronic devices first of all have two advantages

one economically they're very cheap and two because they are so precision guided through

information and communications technology they have a much more dynamic

ability to maneuver through battle space. They're small. They're lightweight. They're small. And there's

precision pinpoint remote control, and none of

these things exist for conventional military hardware.

Okay?

So we're entering an age, basically.

What's up?

Kay, what's up?

Where the entire paradigm of military technology since the 1930s since the age of fortism is finally now coming to an end so since the 1930s you had a

fortist based paradigm of military hardware and infrastructure,

where electronic equipment and electronics and, you know, communications technologies,

radar, whatever, these were used to control as control interfaces. Now, the thing that was a control

interface is replacing the hardware itself almost entirely through the rise of autonomous

weapons and drones and stuff, right?

So, Apache, don't ask me random fucking questions when I'm talking about some specific ass shit.

What the fuck are we talking about here?

Anyway, um...

Uh... So... So we're looking for the first time this is now happening now.

Basically since the 1930s, the last century, the fundamental paradigm of military technology and hardware didn't change.

It just kind of was modulated

and optimized, right?

Through the use of information, technology,

and electronics. Now the information

technology and electronics, which is much cheaper and is produced in vastly larger quantities,

and also there's a blurring of lines between civilian and military hardware here is replacing that foundation.

So the advantage is that it has the full advantage, the full disposal of electrical grids, energy grids, obviously you just plug it in and charge it.

It uses electricity.

And then additionally, you have the advantage of far more control and maneuverability of battle space.

Again, it's like

it's the dynamic ability to send a tweet

somewhere, send a post

somewhere, send a YouTube video somewhere,

whatever.

You can maneuver through real life space with such

direct remote control precision

using information space with such direct remote control precision using

information, energy, electronic

infrastructure, right?

And, okay, so

who's going to win out in this battle?

Is it going to be the new age electronic military infrastructure or is it going to be the old age military hardware?

Ultimately, of course, the new thing is going to win.

I mean, we know that.

But in the short term, the old world is not going to go down without causing a lot of trouble and a lot of disruptions, so to speak.

So from the basic vantage point of common sense economics and just common sense making sure the balance sheet is straight, so to speak, we're not pissing away and throwing away our resources and money.

What states are going to increasingly start to do is basically treat entire energy and electrical information grids as dangerous kind of things that need to be shut down or limited or neutralized in some capacity to reassert the supremacy of the old military infrastructure over the new kind.

Meaning, look, the Ukraine, Russia, Ukraine, a lot of the time they're using Soviet age military hardware, okay?

And the United States is the same.

A lot of our military infrastructure came from the 20th century as well.

This is the bedrock of a very, very strong kind of institutional military doctrine. And there's a stubbornness, and obviously there's a conservatism there because there's an abundance of this shit that was never actually used in a conventional war during the Cold War where it was supposed to and the idea that all this is just going to get pissed away and destroyed and thrown away because of these cheap, small drones that can cause so much chaos and stuff, it's unacceptable to the major superpowers, both Russia and the United States. It's completely unacceptable. You think they're just going to throw away a century's worth, basically, of military infrastructure?

Because overnight, China disrupted literally everything about how everything fucking works.

Now, so we have a strong material material infrastructural and then therefore it's upstream institutional pressure to basically say hey you know what it's wonderful that we live in this new global age of unlimited interconnectivity and everyone's

holding hands and we're dancing together

and we're all singing kumbaya, whatever.

But fuck that shit, right?

We're going to fucking shut the internet down.

We're going to fucking shut the electricity off. We're going to fucking shut the electricity off. We're going to

fucking shut the entire energy and electrical grids off to reassert control and to end this chaos.

Because we're not just going to let an entire century get fucking wiped out.

Now, a few weeks ago, this actually happened in Russia.

Can you believe it?

In Russia, because of the increased frequency of attacks by FPV and autonomous drones from the Ukrainian terrorists,

the Russian government in many parts of Moscow

straight up shut the Internet down. If you could believe it. It's a big debate going on in Russia

right now, by the way, if you don't know this, the Russian

government has banned telegram.

They're trying to completely get rid of telegram.

It's pissing off a lot of people in Russia.

It's even pissing off people at the front.

But the logic

of the Russian government is that, look,

the telegram, and it's being used by the Ukrainian terrorists and by NATO and whatever, you know, as a weapon of war to locate people's locations and track them and yada, yada, yada.

And then internet was temporarily shut down and in huge parts of Moscow,

led to a lot of outcry and anger from the public,

but justifiably because there's no way to get these drones under control

that are just constantly blowing up shit in Moscow. They're just constantly engaged in these terrorist operations and attacks. So how do you stop it? Well, you've got to shut the means of the communication off.

And to do that, everyone's going to take a hit.

There's no way to just isolate the deadly technology from the civilian technology.

So Ukraine, sorry, Russia's already dealing with this dilemma.

There's a strong basis of civilization that is primarily non-information

and non-electronic.

And by the way, you know what this includes is human physical, whatever, the biosphere, whatever, what is it fucking retard, Foucault?

What did he call it?

Something like biopower.

There's this layer of existence, which is human biology, which is also not electronic or informational.

So I'm not saying the Russians are reactionary for doing what they did.

On the contrary, I'm saying this is a real existential dilemma. There's a kind of substrate foundation of the infrastructure of civilization, gas, electricity,

oil, human beings, human bodies, health, whatever. The internet and all these other things

are a stack on top of that, right? That's what it's supposed to be, apparently, right? And now we're looking at a conflict between those two things.

So this is kind of the first human versus AI conflict, if you want to think about it that way,

like from The Terminator. If you're like a Reddit brain retard and you need me to explain this

to you because you're such a retarded baby and you have no other way to understand it.

This is like the Terminator and it's the humans versus the AI.

Basically, right?

But no, there's like this metabolic rift that has been drawn between two eras right because of that

okay so i've been talking about this for a long time i've been talking about this for a long time. I've been talking about this for a long time.

It's not new.

But what's changed?

Well, when you tie that with the coming energy crisis, you're looking at a similar effect.

The disruption of the global oil market and the disruption of widespread accessibility to fossil fuels

and traditional systems of

of energy consumption basically,

which is, yeah, fossil fueled,

is going to be a disruption on society that is measurably and considerably

more dramatic than the covid lockdowns were and if you want to be a klaus Schwabian conspiracy theorist, are you ready for Zee?

Like if you want to be on that kind of shit, it kind of feels like it's gearing up for the great reset when you think about it.

All the shit that's being pushed, I'm not even saying it's bad that's being pushed

but I'm just saying it is being pushed institutionally

on some level

electric cars

solar all this kind of stuff

I'm not saying it's a conspiracy

it's just a tendency of civilization really

those are not going to become truly prolific until a major metabolic rift

or cataclysmic event happens like covid lockdowns were that make them necessary and i think something like that is going to happen.

I think we're looking at something like the emergence of a scenario

where basically traditional 20th century-based centralized electricity and energy systems and all the stacks that upon which they rest are going to be disrupted objectively.

The two kind of

accelerants to that are

proliferation of

of lethal

drone technologies, which hasn't

happened in the United States yet.

We'll see.

By the way, we'll see. And then secondarily, the energy crisis that's a consequence of the Iran war. And this is what I think is objectively, in a scientific sense, going to lead to a new dark ages, at least in North America,

probably in Europe, but especially North America. We're entering a new dark ages, and I can

explain why I think that. First of all, I want to point out the irony, which is that Iran is at the center of all this. Iran is the civilization of light. Iran is the birthplace of Zoroaster. Iran is the birthplace of Cyrus the Great, the birthplace of the entire kind of cosmology and paradigm of light versus darkness,

and the kind of association of the morality with the light and with kingship and so on,

and authority with light.

Well, this is quite literally true in the 21st century.

In the sense that political authority lies with the sovereign that can keep the lights on.

We're looking at

in Cuba, you've seen the footage

of intense blackouts

constantly just plaguing the island.

That's going to come

to more places than just

Cuba because of this energy crisis,

frankly.

And since the 20th century, I have a theory.

The source of political sovereignty is actually rooted in light, literal light, like the ability to maintain centralized electrical

and energy grids is the fundamental premise and foundation of modern statehood, at least

fortist, post-Ffortist era modern statehood

and

the comparison

you could draw maybe

is the centralized

political infrastructure

of great waterworks

and irrigation

canals you know the source of the sovereignty of the Chinese

emperor, the source of the sovereignty of the Egyptian pharaoh, and the power of the kings of

Babylon, and so even in Persia, and so on and so on. It all lied in these states' ability to maintain centralized

hydraulic and irrigation systems, okay? Because back then, water was energy. Water wasn't just water, which we need biologically. Water was also energy,

okay? It powered everything. It was the source of power, was water, right? This is the kind of

hydraulic civilization theory.

However,

so there was just kind of a continuous progress

of integral logic of merging together,

empires getting bigger and bigger and fusing together, and this is basically the trajectory

of civilization for thousands of years in the fertile crescent, culminating in Cyrus the Great,

right, who united the world, the known world. So why were the Greeks, these barbaric Yucubian

snow monkeys running around in mountains, fucking everything up for everybody? up for everybody what was so wrong with these greeks

these yucubians they're just running around they're shitting everything up for everyone

cyrus the great he had a good thing going he united the the whole world. And then these Greeks,

they're just this aberration.

There's just this abomination.

They're a usurious,

quote-unquote, civilization. They don't

invent anything. They steal everything

from everyone, from the Egyptians,

from the Persians, from the Babylonians.

They have nothing. They don't even know how to wash themselves.

They're just these savages who somehow created this kind of pretence to civilization, these

usurious maritime city states that are filled with fat pedophiles that purely depend on slave labor.

And they don't have a freehold culture, freehold civilization.

It's all slaves that do everything,

while fat pedophiles sit in urban cities,

and Plato is raping children,

and Socrates is doing the same,

and Aristotle's doing the same,

and the Greeks are just these

piratical, usurious

they're like the Israel, right?

No, but in all seriousness.

What happened?

Okay, well, first of all,

the Bronze Age collapse happens,

which is, I know, you're a real historian, you're going to problematimize that term. I don't give a fuck. I'm marking a specific thing that happened. Everyone agrees something happened. Following the collapse of the traditional palatial-style civilization, of political authority being based upon centralized economic and hydraulic infrastructure, you have a fracturing of imperial authority into various different kind of mafioso and tribes and feudal-like families.

So this is what historians call the Greek Dark Ages, and it's out of the Greek Dark Ages that the classical age of Greece, as we know it comes to be.

Now, for all that they stole, and it was just outright theft, and for as wicked and awful as these savage Greekreek snow monkeys running around just pooping everywhere and killing each other and raping children and enslaving everyone as awful as they were what

did they actually contribute to civilization when you think about it?

What was the actual contribution? Well, I asked none other than Paul Cockshot for this question,

earnestly and sincerely, and he sent me a book, which led me down a rabbit

hole, of course. It was a good book, actually, about the Greek's actual contributions to science

and technology. And it kind of does line up with the hydraulic theory of civilization

promoted by that one guy in the 50s of

god's name but what it was was that the greeks pioneered decentralized hydraulic energy and and and

water hydraulic systems for the control of water, right?

There's certain ways to lift water.

I mean, they did actually innovate in terms of decentralized hydraulic technology,

which simultaneously added a deeper level of the ability to control the flow and use of water.

And the reason the Greeks experienced a dark age was because they were exposed to the sum total the int— put it this way. Is everyone

fucking listening to me? Is everyone listening? Ones if you're listening? Because I don't want

stupid people drooling right now who are not listening. I want everyone to be listening.

Ones if you're listening. All right, stop, stop with the ones.

I heard a lot of them clear.

Okay, so the Greeks were snow monkeys,

Yakubian snow monkeys. They were living in caves, running around

naked. They were savages for hundreds of

thousands of years, basically, right? Like all of Europe. But what happened? What changed? Well, the sum total

of civilization

science, technology,

culture, you name it,

was directly

imported to the Greeks

and other

peninsular people throughout history.

But the Greeks lived in a geography that was mountainous.

They had natural protection from any kind of attempt to enforce centralized political systems.

Then they had the double advantage of being a rainwater civilization. They had a regular

kind of source of water that came from the sky, and therefore not a need like the Babylonians

did, living in more arid climates, for centralized hydraulic

infrastructure. And it's the combination of these three factors that led to the Greek

Dark Ages. You see, we speak of a Greek Dark Ages.

But what's stupid kind of about the notion of Dark Ages is

it implies there was a light age in that region before.

There was never a light age.

Before everyone was running around living in caves, throwing poop at each other. Okay? What happened is that some Phoenician or something made the mistake of introducing very advanced technology to these savages, these Greeks.

And by the way, if you're Greek and offended, I'm literally joking about all this shit.

Please stop.

Stop, you know, you don't need to be ass hurt about it, okay?

You don't need to be ass hurt about it, okay? You don't need to be ass hurt.

You can put your fucking band-aid on and get your fucking tissue.

I'm literally just joking.

But yeah, there is some Yakub, some arc.

This is the truth of the story of Yakub, by the way.

Some Phoenician Yakub basically gave, like Prometheus, the some access to the real civilization, which was all happening

on the fertile crescent,

right? From the Nile

all the way to the Zagros

Mountains, right?

That is where

you have millennia, millennia of civilization.

It took thousands of years.

See, we get this myth that the Greeks just invented everything.

No, they didn't.

They just stole everything.

Before them, it was just thousands of years of shit going on in the wider world, right?

All of this was suddenly and very rat drastically and abruptly in his very

comparatively shorter time frame introduced to the Greeks so uh what what's the comparison okay the comparison is of course it's like ukrainians honestly

ukrainians very primitive they're not very primitive they're very primitive okay i'm not

going to insult them but i'll just say they were very primitive and Okay, I'm not going to insult them, but I'll just say they were very

primitive. And then very

suddenly and abruptly, the entire

breadth of

all of this kind of

Chinese world technology

was just thrown to them,

the drone technology, right?

And that fucking, it's like, that's what created the dark age of Ukraine, right?

So if you think about this in the Greek context, something similar happens.

All the science and technology that was created by the hydraulic civilization, so to speak. I know that term's problematic, but I'm covering the Oriental civilization, so to speak, was taken by the Greeks and used to create decentralized hydraulic systems.

They already had the natural advantage of regular sources of water that came from the sky.

But with the addition of all of the scientific technology of millennia and millennia of

civilization development at their disposal, they could basically take that and use it to kind of intensify and kind of innovate in putting the rainwater that they're getting to work.

And that's the real technology they innovated.

They took something that was centralized, that was a product of a centralized and unified division of labor, and they used it and put it in the service of kind of the intensive cultivation of

decentralized hydraulic

systems.

And that's why there was a Greek dark ages.

That's why there's any dark ages ever

in history. In Europe

something similar happened. You have three main sources of influence.

One of these is very broad, but I don't care. You have classical Rome, the Western Roman Empire.

Then you have the Byzantine Empire, then you have the Islamic world, okay?

These three centralized political states, policies,

decentralized policies,

created a kind of

infrastructural base,

science, technology, culture, and so on.

And the European

Yakubians took all of

that. They just inherited it without

any effort. And what did

they create from it? Well, they created windmill

technologies. They created all sorts of

decentralized hydraulic technologies,

which was literally the reason

for the European Dark Ages.

The reason, what is a Dark Age? A Dark Age happens, basically, when the integral sum total

culmination of all the knowledge and science and technology of civilization,

which was a product of a unified division of labor, intensifies the kind of vector of differentiation

and political fragmentation through the decentralization of, um, of, of, uh, technology, basically.

That's the best way I would define a dark age.

You know, in one integral totality or division of labor, totality of labor,

you have a kind of base forces of production.

Now, innovations in technology could do two things.

You could create a new, more effective, more powerful,

centralized base of the productive forces

that still unifies society as one complex division of labor, or you have

an opposing tendency, which actually accelerates political fragmentation through the use of

decentralized technology, right?

Which creates the possibility of independent, self-sustaining communities and also military, military defensive capabilities for small statelets and polities.

This is what creates a dark age.

The essence of a dark age is basically the inability to maintain the integral division of labor of all society into one empire so to speak

and it's it's almost like a kind of time travel when you think about it right there's this cyclical

process of a continual revolution in the productive forces across all of

history by the way right do i need ms paint there's this kind of continuous cyclical process

of the renewal and development of the productive forces that happens across history.

I'm talking about like in an Oriental Empire, for example.

But if a Yakubian snow ape takes a time machine, they can kind of intervene at one of the decisive moments in this cyclical process and

disrupt the cycle and basically take the culmination of all known science, culture, and technology,

which ultimately, for it to advance and progress, depends upon

a unified integral division of labor, meaning it depends upon a centralized empire and imperial

authority and so on. But if you can intervene at this critical process and import somehow all of this kind of culmination of science and technology to create decentralized systems, which then don't reintegrate, right?

That's what basically creates the premise of a dark age.

And when you think about it, this makes a lot of sense,

because dark ages also rest upon the premise of usury.

Now, what is the source of usury, right? How is usury possible? In a hydraulic

civilization or a civilization with centralized energy infrastructure, usury is very difficult. Why? Because

if all of society has to cooperate to maintain a kind of shared foundation of material existence, more or less, then one segment of society emiserating the other in a kind of unlimited debt bondage relationship becomes kind of impossible.

But if all of the kind of technology becomes decentralized and militarized as well,

then you're going to have a social Darwinism play out

where there's going to be winners and there's going to be losers.

There's going to be statelets and communities that are more successful

and some that are less successful.

Sometimes for reasons entirely owed

to random natural factors.

It doesn't matter what the reasons are.

Like there wasn't enough

rainwater in this shitty village versus this

other one, right?

And that creates relationships of dependency

and control and um uh enslavement of man by man more or less with debt right that's the foundation and from debt comes slavery the institution of slavery by the way right uh slave I should say, because everyone had slavery, but slave labor as a foundation of society

is created by the Greeks, basically, right?

So, this is one of the central tendencies of the development of civilization now how does that

apply today well uh water believe it or not water is still the foundation all right sorry

before i get to today a europe European modernity was a similar,

created a similar kind of dark ages,

the creation of the steam engine,

and modern capitalism

as we know it.

If you think about it,

Marx's class struggle that he describes.

This is kind of bleeding into the lecture I wanted to give on Prussia.

At Prussia.

Prussia, like Professor Jang says, right?

But more or less, if you think about it, Marx's notion of class struggle in some way articulated two opposing tendencies in the development of modern Europe, right?

One was this kind of Prussian-esque tendency toward further integration and unity, the creation of an imperial authority and tendency, aka the proletarian dictatorship. And the Communist manifesto, what did they say? The working men have no nation, right? This is an integral, unifying tendency of civilization, communism, the proletarian side of the proletarian class struggle. But then on the other hand, you had the kind of opposing tendency, which was the inevitable political fragmentation engendered by the development of capitalism in its degenerate and decadent mode. In its degenerate and its decadent mode, right? And it's degenerate and

its decadent mode, capitalism

more or less corresponds

to

you know,

capitalists

becoming this kind of

oligarchical force, right?

And the public interest or the commons, so to speak, being completely subordinated to the private interest of the capitalist class.

So that's the kind of story of modernity so far. capitalist class. So

that's the kind of story of modernity

so far. Maybe that story

culminates in the very conflict

that we call the Cold War.

Right?

In any case,

Prussia versus

Anglostan was

Soviet Union versus the USA

in some

measure in some way you can look

I'm not a big fan of Prussia

okay my Prussia lecture will be very critical

of Prussia but when you think about it, the Soviet Union versus Nazi Germany is like a Prussian civil war. So it's the Marx communist versus the pedophile, decadent Prussian younger aristocracy both representing

different tendencies that very much did exist

within Prussia, by the way.

Then the Soviet Union wins. It takes

the capital of Prussia, names it

Kalinigrad, and now

the Soviet Union

is fighting the

Anglo-Atlantic

mercantile capitalist world

after, right?

Also

that's when the

after World War II, that's when the

Routless Cosmopolitan campaign happened.

And according to Moisei Postone,

the beginning of left-wing

so-called

anti-Semitism, meaning anti-Zionism,

by the way.

In any case, quite anti-Zionism, by the way. In any case,

quite anti-Semitic, actually,

quite anti-Semitic,

according to Moishi Postone.

Stalin invented anti-Zionism.

Anyway,

on the left. Anyway, on the left.

Anyway, so you...

What does that leave us here?

I think that we're going to be entering a new Dark Ages.

I think that Americans will soon... Okay, can I...

You want me to dumb it down for retards? I could do that.

I think that you're going to go to the gas pump.

It's going to be $10 a gallon. And then electricity is not going to be reliable,

and electrical grids and energy grids are going to fail. And therefore, the foundation of modern

nation states, centralized nation states is going to collapse.

So I said this before.

We live in a society of total surveillance and total control, supposedly.

Right?

But when you think about it, all that depends upon a stack, which is very much being exposed by the Iran war right now.

So if there's no electricity and then there's no, if there's no energy, there's no electricity and there's no internet, the FBI cannot in fact spy on you.

Okay? The CIA cannot in fact spy on you. You're pretty much free to do whatever the fuck you want, right? And that's the breakdown of the control of the state itself, as we know it, the modern state. So what's going to probably happen in America? What's going to

happen? Okay, here's what I expect is going to happen.

If it

becomes unreliable to turn the

fucking lights on, then we're going to

start seeing the proliferation of

do-it-yourself techniques to generate power and electricity.

I mean, there will be selective pressure in the same way there was selective pressure during the lockdowns on the market for just ways to bypass that.

Like, for example, Door bypass that. For example,

DoorDash was an example

that when you think about it.

There are many others.

There's going to be,

this is going to be like the next big thing.

There's going to just be

do-it-yourself alternatives

to the centralized energy grid.

People are going to just,

there's going to be a proliferation of abilities, generators, technologies, solar panel

technologies, all sorts of ways to just bypass this collapse, but that will simultaneously

decentralized political authority.

That will

simultaneously

decentralized

political

authority.

Meaning whoever

controls this

shit is

their own

fucking king.

And because what you're also exercising king.

And because what you're also exercising control over is the entire stacks upon which total systems of surveillance and control depend upon.

So everyone,

there's just going to be a bunch of fucking warlords running around controlling entire neighborhoods

that, because not every household

is going to want to fucking have to do this, right?

So I don't know exactly what scale

it's going to be on, but there's going to be

a decentralization of the stack,

so to speak, decentralization of communications infrastructure, and it's not going to be universal

anymore. A universally shared stack is over. That's what's coming to an end.

And that's the new Dark Ages.

And I know for a fact, I can't say if this will happen in Europe.

I've never been to Europe in my fucking life besides the airports.

And Germany, by the way, treated me very poorly.

So thank you, Germany.

But, and I was at the Charles de Gaulle airport in France.

The food was terrible.

I thought there was going to be croissants and tasty shit.

And it was just fucking garbage

but I've never

been to Europe besides these two airports

and I have to say I don't know

what's going to fucking happen in Europe I know my

country and in my country

if life gets disrupted this severely,

people are going to search for do-it-yourself solutions

and implement them.

I know for a fact that Americans are just going to start

taking shit in their own hands

and trying to bypass the crisis

themselves.

And I know

once if you're American, you agree

me that's how Americans are.

100% they're going to

fucking start doing that shit.

And there's going to be a selective

pressure

to just

it's just going

to spontaneously

proliferate

Americans

look you say

what you want

about Americans

they know

how to

improvise

and improvise

adapt

overcome

whatever like

they're good

at that

Americans

know how to

just do shit

fix problems solve things on a technical level when they're forced to, right?

Um, and so these people that work in garages and know how to tinker with shit, they're going to play a big fucking role in the future of Civil War that's going to happen that I talk about, right?

Okay, so I need you to, this is what a guy who I very much dislike, but I keep referencing

lately, Louis Althusser will call

a kind of overdetermination of all these different variables

and factors. Okay, couple this

with the political

polarization I've been talking about for years,

which is systemically and institutionally unsustainable.

There's all these factors will converge

and lead to the simple result of

political fragmentation,

warlord era, dark ages,

Civil War.

Okay?

And that is going

to happen. Maybe it'll be

in 20 years or something, but it will happen eventually, right?

Texas has its own power grid.

It doesn't fucking matter.

Or maybe it does, but look, all it takes is two things to happen so that it doesn't matter what Texas has.

Proliferation of these technologies that reduce dependency on centralized infrastructure.

Meaning any warlord can emerge somewhere and say,

fuck you to the entire state and the government i'm gonna fucking power my own

shit i'm no longer dependent on you second thing is the proliferation of lethal autonomous weapons

which is more likely than you would think and it it was predicted by Death Stranding 2, by the way.

Which is a very prophetic...

Kojima's fucking... somehow he knows shit

before it happens. So there's that.

And so those two... All it takes us those two things to just disrupt the foundations of the unity of the United States of America.

And these will happen.

So, why, okay, so now we have to think about what is the basis of the unity of the division of labor really because

how then do after experiencing dark ages and political fragmentation

does

a division of labor

reintegrate do a people

reintegrate do

statelets and and so on

reintegrate how is the integration

process if you are an American Communist Party member and you're reintegrate. How is the integration process?

If you are an American Communist Party member and you're part of this

cult, that's the question

that should be on your mind. That's the Prussia

pill, so

to speak, that I wanted to talk about.

That's the foundation of Marx and the

Communist Manifesto and so on this very question when you think about it right

emphasis on when you think about it which I know many of you bitch-ass people are not thinking, so don't worry.

First of all, I want to just leave it on this before we transition into our debates.

It's actually not directly a shared infrastructure.

There's something that pre-existence shared uh material infrastructure and that is a shared

cosmos a shared law think about boris gryes, a shared language, but not language in the conventional sense as a mere means of communication, but a shared kind of symbolic order, if you will, right? A shared communication of a kind of pre-conceptual, even pre-lingual authority, shared logo, sure, right?

That binds and glues together communities who almost have nothing else gluing them together except the word and where do these communities exist in the real world nomads nomadic peoples don't have the shared infrastructure. They have the shared word, the shared bond.

My word is worth something.

That's the difference between life and death and the pastoral nomadic societies in history, right?

Because they don't have centralized hydraulic infrastructure.

They don't have any of

that, they have the word.

And the word

becomes the decisive

means of production,

so to speak, that unifies

the people together.

You know, when Islam arose, the world was quite dark.

You had the assassinates who were quite degenerate.

They were doing this incest stuff, which was really nasty.

But they were quite degenerate in every sense of the word.

I mean, economically, politically politically they were governed by kind

of private interests so to speak feudal interests there was a severe tribal fragmentation that

defined the arabian peninsula where the tribes were divided between

different powers.

And this division was felt across the region because the Romans, believe it or not, they created a dark age.

And that's the context Islam arose from.

What they call Jahlia was really dark age

If you're Muslim then take my lecture and say

What I mean by dark age is Jhaaliyah it's the ignorance

What is the ignorance?

The ignorance is the ignorance of the kind of integral

Unified Totality of Labor when the division of labor becomes so

acute that you lose sight of what unifies us right in material reality this is jahalia this is

the ignorance the the pre-logos, right?

Okay. So, how can we reunify society after technology divides us?

I'm Hideo Kojima and this is my fucking...

Life's work, is it not? Isn't that what fucking death stranding is about?

Like, technology is dividing us, so how do we reunify?

How do we reconnect?

That's the question that matters, especially if you're in the ACP.

You should think about that question. Because if you're in the ACP. You should think about that question.

Because if you take what I say

uncritically, you should say, well, then

technology is the problem. But no, it's

irreversible. The do-it-yourself,

the decentralization of energy and electrical infrastructure is progressive.

There's no going back.

And just like for the Greeks, it was progressive.

The Greek innovations in decentralized hydraulic technologies were after Alexander's conquest actually applied to the Nile River irrigation systems and improved agriculture in in I left off.

Okay, I left off at improved Nile Agriculture. Buy a new

Mike. You know what? Leningrado

1917, why don't you buy me a new

Mike? Why don't you drop fucking

like 20

subs or some shit, bro? I'll be

Haas Shekelstein tonight. You want to be on some

you want to be on some shit like that? I'll be Haas Shekelstein tonight You want to be on some You want to be on some shit like that

I'll be on some Haas Shekelstein type of shit

Okay

Grab it up then bro

Jennifer you better not by the way

You better not

This doesn't apply to you

See for you better not by the way you better not this doesn't apply to you see bro i was

stras and i should say that estrill stanney all the typical all the usual don't apply to y'all y'all

are good.

Bro, I stress Annie, thank you, though. Anyway, um...

Get a new PC. Bro, are you retarded?

CEO? Guys, you don't actually... Guys, come on. What are we doing here?

CEO! What's up?

Bro, I'm so Jewish. This is crazy.

Autistic, what's up, bro? Comrade Thomas.

Okay, guys, I'll fucking buy a new one. Holy shit. I'll literally buy a new one.

I heard you loud and clear.

Uh, base populace, I got you, bro.

Thank you.

All right.

Listen, guys.

Anyway, it's so Jewish of me.

It's just so Jewish.

I just know, it's just coming natural like that.

You know, it's just like some natural ass shit.

It's just like some natural ass shit that just come naturally to me like that, You know, it's just like some natural ass shit. It's just like some natural

ass shit that just come naturally to me like that,

you know? Anyway.

Okay, so,

because here I was thinking, let me continue, because

the decentralized hydraulic technologies that the Greeks

innovated when Alexander Conquered post the Tolmaic Egypt applied these technologies to improve Nile River hydraulic systems.

Bro, Leningrado, you didn't have to do that, bro. Thank you. Teppo, what's up, bro? Thank you for the five.

Appreciate you guys.

I was joking.

Anyway.

Listen, y'all, you know, you don't have to donate to this shit.

You just got to, um, you just got to show support, uh, like as a call.

I just want your mind and your soul.

That's enough.

And even if you, if it ever came, guys, that, you you know you couldn't afford to

sustain the streams I'll find it I'll find

another way all right don't worry

but thank you guys I appreciate it

all right so anyway

um

what was I saying

so uh What was I saying?

So,

the... Here I was thinking

for a long time.

I thought Alexander the Great

was just this

savage booty bandit who was running around antiquity.

Lenin Dubois, what's up?

I thought Alexander the Great was just this savage booty bandit running around antiquity,

taking men's butts and plundering

and looting all the gold and resources

and contributing nothing

to civilization and it was just

complete ransacking

he was funded by

eusurious Macedonian feudal by um usurious

Macedonian

feudal

petterasts

and he was just running around

plundering everybody's shit

stealing

and there's truth to that

but then I then I looked at the kind of statistics, and I was like, okay, but why did the population grow post-Hellenism?

Why was the population growing?

That's why I DM Paul Cockshot, and I asked him about Greek technology and its contributions

because it confused me. And then I learned that the hydraulic technologies that the Greeks

implemented in Greece were then applied to actually improve the centralized hydraulic systems in the orient and actually reinforce the state power, right?

Captain, what's up?

So, we can't be anti-technology.

That's what I'm trying to tell you.

We can't be anti-technology.

We can't say, well, technology is going to divide us,

so we have to be opposed to technology.

No, what we have to do is discover more fundamentally what unites us.

Insofar as we say, the only thing that unites us is national electrical and energy grids. That's true. But why is that? Well, because they reinforce our

habits. Well, what are our habits ultimately rooted in? So this is going to give us an opportunity

to rediscover civilization, to rediscover civilization to rediscover really what unites us

as civilization as a people as a nation whatever you want to call it and this is in my opinion

this is the position uh this is, in my opinion, this is the position, this is the mission of the American Communist Party on this continent.

That's, okay, what's the American Communist Party for?

Well, I think civilization is going to fragment

and collapse in North America, and the

American Communist Party is here to

reunify it after it does.

Fuck!

Kofk said he'll be

he'll be the running hamster

to run my streamlights.

All right, we, where did he say that? Where did he say that? running hamster to run my streamlights all right we

where did he say that

where did he say that shit

you know what's funny is I could dead ass imagine that shit

I could dead ass imagine that shit

I could actually I could visualize and picture that

I could visualize and picture that shit.

He's just running

the whole time.

Okay, we're going to start our

Tick-Tac.

We're going to start our Tic Tac.

Are you all ready for the Tic Tac?

Ones if you're ready for Tic Tac. All right, y'all, we're going to be, we're going to be getting into the debate segment.

Oh, you know what? Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold hold on hold on hold on wait wait who's that

person that was in vc talking about how the drug trade is anti-imperial is get them in vc right now

unbanned them right now what was their name did they agree they were going to debate?

Because we'll just debate them right now in VC before.

Who is that person?

Lentil.

Okay, where is Lentil?

Unbanned Lentel and bring them into V.C.

They said they won't debate.

Ah, yeah, yeah, of course.

Of course.

Just, like, just hijack the Discord and hijack everybody's fucking attention and shit.

And don't actually give the stream any fucking content.

Thank you so much.

She went to bed. Okay, yeah. You know, You know, You know, Thank you. Yo, can you hear me now? Y'all, can you hear me now? What up, y'all? Can you hear me now? What up, y'all? Are you able you hear me now what up y'all can you hear me now what up y'all are you able to hear me now

what up y'all are you able to hear me now yeah all right Yeah? All right.

Good.

All right.

Okay, so

I want to tell you guys something.

Debate and Discord unbanned.

Okay, somebody unbanned them.

Mods unbanned them.

Unband them.

Unband them.

What are we talking about unband them go unband them unband them any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods any mods mods? Any mods? Any mods? Any mods? Any mods? Any mods? Any mods can unband them.

Amirio, what's up, bro? Are you here?

Volk. Okay, yeah, Volk is here.

Volk, their name is lentils, like the beans.

All right, while y'all do that,

while y'all get to that,

Paperwin, what's up, bro? Yeah, all y'all can do that. So while y'all get to that uh paperwin what's up bro yeah all y'all can do that so while y'all do that

i want to sit talk about something which is that i thought i was autistic for a long time i feel like i'm

autistic i feel like i feel like there's just things on an everyday level that i understand that makes sense to me, but then people, they just

think I'm strange, and they don't understand it until I explain it to them. And then they

understand it. They have existential dread. So I thought for a long time that I was autistic.

And sometimes I still think I'm autistic, right?

But then I realized something.

But then I realized something.

I'm not autistic.

Hit Kalady.

What's up, bro?

I realize something.

I'm not autistic.

I'm just Uzbek.

You understand?

I realize that.

I'm just Uzbek.

We don't deal with any trifling nonsense.

We don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

I'm Uzbek.

I'm Uzbek. We don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

I'm Uzbek.

Meaning the nomadic... with trifling nonsense. I'm Uzbek. Meaning

the nomadic

pastoral nomadic

migration patterns, they don't change.

The sun rises in the morning

and sets at

dusk.

So like, I'm Uzbek.

I don't have to care about any trifling nothing.

So people think I'm autistic.

I'm actually Uzbek.

And people say socially, I'm, I'm autistic. I'm Uzbek. I'm autistic

I'm Uzbek

we don't deal with any trifly nonsense

I promise

I promise

we don't have to deal with trifly

people say on a social level

Oz is

strange no I'm Uzbek we don't have to deal with level Oz is strange.

No, I'm Uzbek.

We don't have to deal

with trifling nonsense.

You know what I mean?

Do you understand

what I'm talking about

on this?

I'm Uzbek.

You know what I mean?

The type

where I don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

So here we are on TikTok.

Guys, the TikTok is literally ask me anything.

Don't ask me stupid questions like, what do I think about Mexican food?

Ask me anything.

Communism will never work already has it already has so what are you talking about uh where is lentil whereil? Okay, we have to unbanned lentil. We also have to expedite there.

Give roll up lentil with the member roll so they could just, we just expedite this shit.

Where is communism working today? China and the whole world. Because communism is the riddle of history solved. The whole, all of world history is bending into communism. Communism is winning everywhere, according to science and the laws of history.

If you disagree with that,

it's probably because you're mentally defective,

frankly.

Lentil is sleeping.

What the...

What are y'all talking about?

It's like 3 a.m.

Some Australian nonsense.

Some Australian nonsense.

You think a communist and Muslims can come together? sense.

Do you think a communist and Muslims

can come together?

Seamus,

who is Seamus?

Bring up Seamus.

Bring them up.

Guys, ask me anything. Honest to God. Literally, ask me anything.

Honest to God.

Literally just ask me anything.

Straight up, ask me anything.

Ask me anything about my worldview, about what I believe about.

And if, no, no, no, ask me anything like education-wise. Like, if there's something you don't know that you want to know ask me ask me i'll be the teacher ask me anything has your position

developed yeah my my the optics have developed meaning i i know how to has your position developed?

Yeah, the optics have developed,

meaning I know how to say it in a way that's not going to trigger

people who are neurodivergent

and rage and scream

when they hear something that, you know, they're throwing all these other implications on with it that are never being said.

How are Randers supposed to know your communist, and that is a debate? Because I said so. So there's somebody named anime owner.

Hi.

I just wanted to ask you a question

about your views. That's okay. Okay. Um, I just wanted to know, um, if you had someone who was a conservative, like, how would you try to convince them of, perspective because i have friends who i try to

like educate um but it feels like really difficult because they feel like pretty indoctrinated

about what about what um i try to teach them about like the basics of like leftist um like ideology

but it just but i'm not like well read myself so it feels difficult to um okay but on what

real world view is it because leftist ideology just kind of sounds like nonsense.

So on what issue or worldview or thing are you trying to win people over on?

That's the question you should really ask.

Oh, well, I don't have a specific.

I was trying to go for like a general perspective.

Because according to the left, quote unquote, leftist ideology, they call me far right.

So that doesn't mean a whole lot to me.

But you're not far right.

Correct, I'm not. But that's why the whole notion of this nebulous leftist ideology is pointless.

What is the leftist ideology? I mean, your left-wing politically or your right-wing, but what is the leftist ideology?

We have to agree with all these things that are just bundled together in a package deal because

Obama said so

I don't I'm not buying it

this kind of sounds like an

Obama Obamaism

I'm not an Obamaonist

No I'm just not well read myself

I'm sorry I was just trying to No so you don't have just not well read myself. I'm sorry. I'm just trying to...

No, so you don't have to be well read.

I understand.

You don't have to be well read.

So I guess, like, where do you even start?

Like, how do I get from my perspective or from my point to your point? I don't know what your point is, though.

Like, what is your...

But I don't have a specific

I only have like a general idea

but why are why are you

well okay what makes you

what makes left wing ideas compelling to you

um I you, what makes left-wing ideas compelling to you?

I like the idea of having a greater

unity, at least in a social

like Democrats.

You guys saw my hands did not move i didn't do anything it's just quite literally not my fault um bro this one guy keeps trying to join bro true philosophy bro it's like every time can you get somebody else to join bro

hello what's up bro but come on you've been on way too long bro okay yeah so i wanted to ask this

specific thing and then maybe go into some other things i've been thinking about, but I do have a much more concrete thing to talk about than last time. So here it is. With the forces that be and the ruling class, having a vested interest in

antagonizing and exploiting

particular groups

do you think that perhaps obligates

a communist party to

go out of their way to

I'll bring you back after this guy I'm sorry

HG go ahead Calarism killed a hundred I'll bring you back after this guy. I'm sorry.

H.G. Go ahead.

Caller him killed 100 G. The name is one.

Your name is HG.

Can you comment on what your name means?

Bro, what the fuck is going on?

I'm bringing the other guy back.

He literally left.

He said communism killed 100 trillion people.

Got it, bro.

All right, sorry.

Listen, which groups are the state targeting?

Go ahead.

Black people, right now, Latin people, a lot lot more i guess brown people in general um let's see queer people

except that's more of a narrative thing how does the state target queer people this is a question

i've never had answered queer people just continuing to push for policy, which limits their ability to have the same

expressive permissions as straight people.

The game airs, political theater conversation.

The, the, um... Well... It's just political theater, though. conversation the well

it's just political

theater though what does it mean

because it's

gay marriage

because I don't

what else is there?

Hold on

I guess

I think it's constant

I think it's constant I think that's

Okay there's

There's mean words

And mean things being said

Look

I don't agree

That oppression

takes the form

Of

You know all these different

identities that on an intersection

their struggles quote unquote

intersect

curiously every single one of these

identities the question of whether they're legitimate

or not is just whether

they're accepted institutionally.

Why aren't furries a legitimate

field of struggle in your mind?

What about furries?

That's just a hobby, you know?

Okay. Well, no, for many of them, there's a deep, like it's very deeply, I have this animal spirit.

I'm, I'm, I'm, have the spirit of, of a, of a giraffe or something.

And then it's very, you see, I'm, I'm see i'm just saying like what what makes it a

political meaningfully political struggle for a marxist who does who decides that except

obama see the dnc gets to decide what is a quote unquote, and then Marxists come and say, this is the people's democratic struggle.

No, this is a completely meaningless lifestyle and private habit people have that has nothing to do with politics in any meaningful way

see that may go for like queer people but i think that um for for um for um the racial conflicts of course those are a lot those go a lot deeper and they are very much more

I agree, but that's part of what Marxists will call the national question. So the United States has a disfigured national democratic history

and

you can put that in a Marxist framework

and make total sense of it.

The black population's

struggle is tied to the land struggle, you know, always has been.

It's tied to the struggle for democratic equality and citizenship.

It's tied to the struggle for a unified and integral national existence.

Because American national existence doesn't exist

by the way someone tried to say i'm a dougan i'm a nazi for talking about national existence

the problem is america is not a nation yet okay uh because you had people that came from Europe you had people that came

from wherever and the premises that according to Stalin that unify people into a

nation is not finished in America so black people and that whole thing is part of that process of the national becoming of America and the creation of a society of, you know, the democratic struggle for equal rights and so on through the civil rights struggle. And then now that has been

transposed to a fundamental economic question, right, which is political rights exist, universal

political quality exists, and yet there is an uneven level of development with respect to black communities versus white communities, which reintroduces...

But that antagonism touches upon the universal predicament of the American nation, which is the fact that our system and our state doesn't serve the common interest of the people in their well-being.

And that touches upon that for sure.

Now, the Democrats and others have tried to exploit this fact by pitting the white worker against the black worker and saying you have to bow your head and pay your privilege and that this is all this is about our internal feelings of racism this is about our psychologies this is about our perceptions and our feelings because they turned what should be a material

struggle into a psychological struggle that's when all of these other things from intersectionality

started being bundled into the package.

And that's what I object to fundamentally as a Marxist.

You also think it's funny to bring up this

material versus psychological

dichotomy. I don't know about dichotomy's

right word, but

because that brings into another concept about how I believe that

liberals and conservatives dialectically produce

like Trump and Trumpism. I believe that it started with

conservative figures having like jokes that have some kind of real bigotry in them, but they pose as fake bigotry.

Liberals proceed to call that out.

And then there was an era of grandstanding on context

and if there's a

you don't get it, it's deeper.

And instead of deepening the analysis

to get past that, because of course they're the loser,

fascists, they don't really want to, you know,

win these debates.

They instead, further out their analysis.

They made it worse.

So they started just blatantly ignoring any kind of context.

And having this new form of anti-bigotry where it's just a, it's just I don't care what it really was.

It's tone policing and it's intensely psychological.

It has nothing to do with what Marxism regards is politics at all.

Yeah.

It's it's about manufacturing, uh,

psychologists, behaviors, temperaments, tones and, and ultimately, you know, a certain world of affects and, you know, perceptions, I don't know, and this is very sensitive and insecure, and somehow that's conflated with politics.

Right.

Well, I think in particular, Latin Americans, there's a unique situation there.

Maybe not that unique, but I think, you know, there's obviously the idea that they, that we want to bring them in so that we can get cheaper.

How old are you?

18.

Are you in a high school cafeteria?

Sorry, now this is a lounge to a dorm building.

I can go to a quieter portion. right no i'm just i'm just

somebody was saying that i was just saying that would be crazy like what the hell no so um

you know there's that of course that that um fact and i think that like with trump's current austerity it's a matter of trying to get them

back in line trying to get them not to advocate for themselves and instead to be in fear and so do you

think that that would particularly obligate a communist party to give them back the chance to advocate as a worker?

Well, look, no, no, a communist should not play into this game that

that is this intensely

psychological game that

liberals and quote unquote

conservatives play with each other.

We should fundamentally ignore that

and rip the material infrastructure

from under them by asking for the meat and potatoes.

Okay, Matt Walsh can sit

here and talk about transgender is all he wants.

We should simply ignore

it and say, what about Epstein? What about

Netanyahu? What about Iran?

What about things that actually matter?

Key sensitive points and sensitive issues, especially the Israel question, which will turn the Republican right into the very same neurotic, politically correct liberal that they grift off of

humiliating.

So there's a grain of truth

in how the right wing grifts by

exploiting people's

antagonism toward the bourgeois liberal.

There's a grain of truth there.

People hate the inauthenticity.

But as communists, we can apply that same tactic against the right wing and expose the

kernel of truth.

Okay, let's be plain spoken in common sense about reality.

You see, Zionism is at the foundation

of the liberal identity politics and the right-wing Matt Walskrift. I'll tell you why. The whole

creation of this sensitive PC safe space originally started with Zionists who believed that anti-Semitism was the number one crisis in America, and tried to completely gatekeep and control tones and behaviors and language, just because they thought that the alternative was going to be the next mustache guy, right?

Right.

So this neurotic, completely hysterical, artificial manufactured world of delusion and deception of, you know, gatekeeping truth itself.

Just by pointing fingers, you call someone anti-Semitic, it's over.

Conversation ended.

Okay, that's the Zionists are the ones that introduces this into U.S. politics.

Then liberals take that, and they add a bunch of other things.

So, black people very legitimately said, okay, but wait, we've been through a lot.

So they added black people to that.

Then they added other people.

Then they added homophobia and all these other things.

And the foundation is the Zionism.

Right?

Well, the foundational victim is...

Foundational victim is Jewish.

So, that's the sensitive little bubble that the liberals created.

Then the Republican

right just griffs

by saying they just

selectively popping bubbles

right? And

seeing their hysterical reaction

and that's a way to channel

people's resentment against the bourgeois liberal,

and while the right wing is sneaking in all these other agendas. So we should just pop the whole

bubble, because actually the Republicans are also in a bubble. So maybe I'll bring you back in a

second with somebody else is in my VC.

Oh, it's finally, it's finally Lentel, the famous Lentel.

Wow.

Lentel, go ahead.

What's up?

Hello.

Hello. Hello. Hello?

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

So what is this nonsense I'm hearing about that the drug trade is anti-imperialists?

I said

the narco-economics

are a way

for the resistance

to fund itself.

Which resistance?

For example,

Assad Syria was a narco-fiel resistance. For example,

Assad Syria was the beginning of the end

for Assad. This was the beginning.

By the way, you know who was against this

was Qasem Soleimani?

And when he was gone, this

nonsense started kicking in and it laid the foundation for the popular

grievance and resentment against the Syrian state because it refused to reform along any

lines that would actually produce and generate viable sources of wealth for the...

What did an Iranian general have to do with Syria's...

Because Kalsam Soleimani was leading at the vanguard of the defense of the Assad government against al-Qaeda and he very much

had an advisory role with respect to okay well how do we actually prevent how do we address the

social conditions that give rise to the enemy's ranks swelling up, right?

So he was really adamantly trying to fight corruption within the Assad government.

Okay, sure, but there was still a significant period of time where Assad's government did use the drug trade to fund its resistance. And also, this is one example. Not the resistance to, no, no, no, it didn't use it to fund the state. To fund the state. Not even, not even. Not even. To fund corrupt officials who personally were benefiting from it.

That was their source of revenue. That's how they were getting rich. That was what ensued the loyalty of the military bureaucracy within Syria. There is this chain of command of these different generals and whatever who were making money off of this, basically. And it was, that's why the morale did not exist within

Syria to defend the state

when Jolani came

because it wasn't founded

it wasn't based on a morale of true

national sovereignty and patriotism

and so on and so on

at that point had entered a stage of corruption.

But they produced something like, what, 80, 90% of the world's captagon supply?

So you're saying all of this money went to corrupt officials and none of it was used to, you know, the state.

Meaningfully, it wasn't used.

Maybe there were some maintenance there here or there, but it didn't really meaningfully

address the material needs of the Syrian people.

I question this point, but since there's

limited evidence to either side, I will bring up

another case. Taliban and Afghanistan

used the poppy

market for a long time

to fund their resistance against the American

empire. Uh, for a long time to fund their resistance against the American Empire.

I don't think that was a significant

source of revenue for them.

I'd have to question that.

But something like

98% of the world's op opium

comes from Afghanistan

and the Taliban did manage to survive

for what decades?

No I know but what's the proof that the Taliban

was yeah but the Taliban was not

wealthy they didn't have advanced military equipment

or infrastructure or technology.

They had what they already had.

They just had mountains.

They had, they needed food. They needed clothes

and not much else, honestly.

Yeah, and they used the

narco economy to get this. I think the opium production

was primarily,

the revenues were primarily going to the

U.S.-backed warlords, not the Talban.

I mean, I'm

sure that it also went to the U.S.,

but, you know,

it's very difficult for the Taliban to get

you know, funds from any difficult for the Taliban to get, you know,

funds from any other way.

So I question...

The Taliban didn't...

The Taliban's a local insurgency.

So a local insurgency can get fed and clothed

and materially supported by the villages that it's operating within, and that's fine.

It's a standard guerrilla war tactic.

If you're combining hybrid conventional methods of war with your asymmetrical warfare, then yes, you're going to need some revenue, so to speak. For example, the yellow guys in Lebanon do have to combine conventional and unconventional tactics of war. So they actually do need revenue, right? They're not just, you know, living off of the villages.

But I just fail to see what your point is.

By the way, we just skip the difficulties.

I'm sure that you could find an example somewhere in history of guerrilla partisans who are anti-imperialist obtaining some measure of some source of revenue from the drug trade the reason i don't think it's very common is because uh guerrilla warriors will fall into two categories.

One is a

kind of

a

purely

indigenous kind of

struggle where it's a pure

asymmetrical form of

war and they're

purely living off of the land that they're standing upon.

Now, this is an extremely effective form of guerrilla war in many senses, because it kind of constantly

replenishes the underlying source of morale for the guerrilla army and creates a dichotomy that that situates

the indigenous population versus the imperialists and there's not much mediation necessary

when they have when when the gorilla wars becomes truly protracted and they have to, when the guerrilla wars becomes truly protracted and they have to start combining conventional methods of war, which means they have to buy equipment and they have to like, you know, get revenues to that are external and kind of exogenous from the homeland, this will place them within a greater world system than just their homeland. So this introduces an element materially into the anti-imperial struggle that is no longer indigenous or no longer rooted in the soil or the homeland.

Now, this could, for example, be in the case of the yellow guys in Lebanon, the exogenous sources are on. Everyone knows that. for many guerrilla struggles around the world

there was an exogenous source in the soviet union uh and so on and so on when your guerrilla war

has to last so long that you have to tap into the global drug trade it has a corrupting effect now you're depending upon a system that is very well integrated within the global economy and primarily controlled by the CIA, by the way.

When your voice cut out, can you repeat?

Yeah. When you get to the point where you have to rely on revenues from things like the drug trade to support your protracted guerrilla war struggle, you get to a point where it has a corrupting effect because you're integrating yourself into a well-established world system, very much controlled by the CIA, by the way, which creates materially a foundation of resistance that is external and alien from the native population.

And this creates a

disconnection between the partisans

and the people

on whose behalf they fight.

Yeah, I wasn't

commenting on how efficient

or moral it is to use

the narco-

I'm not saying moral in the

abstract. I'm not talking about moral

in the abstract. Let's focus

on effectivity, right?

Okay, I wasn't even talking about the effectiveness.

I was just purely talking that it is a reaction to the empire,

but it doesn't diminish the fact that it is you know resistance still

but it's

it's

it's um

it could maybe be resistance but what it

mainly is is a resistance that has

been conquered by the world system

at this point you know it's no longer

viably uh able to supplant or replace the imperial

hegemony because it no longer has the popular base. If you have a popular base, you don't need to do

these things. You have a popular base, you don't need a drug trade.

Now, if the source of your support among the people

is that you have revenues that come from the drug trade,

then you don't have truly organic,

revolutionary support from the people because this revolutionary support comes from the word.

Okay? The prophets in the Bible or Muhammad and so on, they didn't need to bribe people with money to get their support. They had the word.

Che Guevar didn't need to get people money. He had the word. Lenin, he had the word, right? You have the word. You don't need drugs. You don't need money. You don't need a bribe people.

You just need to tell the truth and organize people and bring justice

and so on and so on.

Yeah, I mean, I never argued that. My point was

more that this is

like an inevitable side effect.

It's inevitable when you failed.

When you failed to adapt,

when you failed to refine,

when you've basically lost,

and you become this kind of zombie

that just is maybe sustaining your existence, but going nowhere.

And what about Taliban?

I don't think the Taliban was, I don't know any evidence the Taliban was primarily

funded by revenues that came from

the drug trade.

I just know that one of the terms

used to describe how Ivan was

narco-terrorists, because they did

that was such a significant part of their

activity.

I think that was just propaganda. I think that was just propaganda.

I think that was just propaganda, if I'm being completely honest.

But anyway, Lentel, I want to ask you, what do you think about the Mexican cartels?

I think they are inevitable products of the

hedging that U.S. established in the South.

But they weren't committed by the CIA?

Some of them might have been.

So what's

what was the big hubbub about in the

Discord? What was the big hubbub?

Well, people, I think,

widely misunderstood my stance.

When I said...

At once she's capping and she was way more extreme and she's just being reasonable now because she's summoned in front of everyone.

Once if she's capping and she was saying some crazy ass shit but now is being more reasonable

who knows somebody tell me what the big hub i don't believe there was big hubbub i don't think

my people are that unreasonable there was some big ass hubbub going on

because you were saying some crazy

ass shit. What the hell were you saying?

People were claiming that I was saying that

all drug cartels

are anti-imperialists, which

I multiple times...

What did y'all? What did she say that had y'all tweaking? What did y'all... What did you all... What did I say?

It's so funny that the TikTokers think I'm talking to them.

Ticktokers are doing ones.

Bro, y'all don't even know what's going on.

I'll come back to y'all.

Don't worry.

She said Mexican drug cartels

challenge U.S. imperialism.

They hurt

the U.S. and South America not benefit

from them. Yeah, I

think that's just totally wrong.

I think my argument

was that

because of

U.S. Are you Mexican or you live in Europe?

You said it's 3 a.m. where you live?

Yeah, I live in Europe.

What dog do you have in this race?

It was literally just a random

debate, but your people kept dragging it for like a day but what dog

what country are you from um originally iranian okay but what dog do you have in this race

nothing where people just kept dragging it

and i don't know why do you have this position it's so bizarre

it's not a crazy position honestly i'm just um

it's a very commonly known thing that

it's because of the US

that the drug cartels exist

and they keep using those as an excuse

for even enhanced prisons

in South America

yeah but the CIA creates the drug trade

everyone knows that

I mean so you just like getting this is that you like drug trade. Everyone knows that.

I mean,

so you just like gangsters.

Is that you like gangsters? You wanted these European. Maybe they're COVID at some point.

You wanted these European... But I were defending them.

You wanted these European goons that run

around with the track shoots and shit, right?

That's the type of shit.

No, that's not exactly.

You just use down with the gangster culture.

That's what it is.

Just one of these knife-wielding European goons running around with the track suits you know slinging

heroin

everywhere

and shit

right

I'm just saying

that

narco economics

what dog

do you have

in this race

ultimately

what's the dog

in the race

nothing

I'm just

interested in

how different aspects

different parts of the world react

to imperialism. For example, in many

parts of the world, they react to a drug

trade. I would say that a lot

of the drug problems globally

are because of the US imperialism.

But that's not what you're saying that the cartels were anti-imperialists.

I just want to know what dog you have in the race

to be saying that.

I said cartels could be anti-imperalists.

And I even quoted a source that said

Guevara and

No, I couldn't say

which ones in particular

sub-man specialization

But I did read a source that said

Guevara and

No, that's just propaganda. Why are you taking propaganda

and what if they

say I did that? Would you believe it?

Of course, I didn't know it was propaganda.

Yeah, but so even if they said

Pesto Mine was doing it, would you believe it?

I mean, I know about Afghanistan

and I know about Syria and I know in those

cases it was used.

It was used, like,

it makes sense.

If you have no other options, if all of your other economies

have been completely cooked by the empire, like, why not, why not reserve to drug trade?

Because, here's why. Because the people are still a factor, right? What about the people? How do the people live? How do they support themselves? Ultimately, you have a foundation of people

that have to grow food and they have to eat and they have

to have a society.

And if your entire society

depends upon drugs, you do

not even have the material premises

that justify your nation in the first place.

Let's be honest.

Like Dubai, for example.

No, like the UAE.

No, Afghanistan, they can grow food, okay?

The UAE...

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, why do you love lizard eaters?

The UAE are in the desert eating lizards.

They don't have anything. They don't eating lizards they don't have anything

they don't have water they don't have

anything

they don't deserve to exist

but because they're leaching off

of global supply chains because they're hustling

oil or something I don't know

they're allowed to exist so something, I don't know,

they're allowed to exist.

So if your nation,

if it's drugs are that for you,

you can't even grow food?

You don't even have food?

China was cut off from the world.

They built themselves.

Albania under Enverhojo was cut off from the world Why didn't Alinverhoja have to sell drugs?

That's the nuclear bomb

you'll never be able to respond to it.

What?

Inverhoja, Albania.

They didn't need it.

They were cut off from the wholeia. They didn't need it.

They were cut off from the whole world.

I don't know about Albanian mystery.

Well, you should look up. But I'm questioning.

You should look it up.

The opium production of Afghanistan actually caused like major furious in other aspects.

People were going under the Taliban in Afghanistan, they shut it down.

We used to eat a lot of water,

and the poppy farmers were using

all of the water and all of the ground reserves

and not leaving it after. They were propped up

by the U.S. under the Taliban, they didn't exist.

Damn!

They restricted my shit!

Why did they restrict my shit?

What did I say?

Live visibility reduced.

Damn, this shit is cooked.

Anyway, keep going.

Actually, it did exist under Taliban, only in the most recent, when they cooked the power again, then they completely destroyed it.

We can't say the ban, the the the the the t ban all right shit

what if somebody's spamming acp is larp if you don't get in VC and say with your

chest you're a pussy for the rest of your life anyway um lentil. Okay. Is this done?

Uh, I'm just saying I'm Uzbek.

I don't buy the nonsense.

All right.

Say how you would say it to a Uzbek.

I'm Uzbek.

I don't deal with nonsense.

Do you know about that?

No, I don't.

Yeah, but I'm Uzbek.

I said I go out of the knees no i'm uzbek we don't deal with nonsense

this none of your what anything you said has to do with migration patterns

at all

migration patterns i don't talk about migration patterns

exactly i'm ozbeck and you're talking a whole lot of migration patterns. I don't talk about migration patterns.

Exactly. I'm Uzbek and you're talking a whole lot of nonsense, to be honest.

Okay, sure.

If you come with me, I would like to go to sleep now.

Who woke you up?

I didn't know you're... I mean mean i didn't even think you would come i was

i was woken up so i could get unbanded and i wanted to be unbound

all for a discord sir i wouldn't wake up for that shit anyway all right

goodbye all right goodbye

all right you can go back to sleep

what kind of crazy fucking cult is this shit

that people can't even sleep

so they get a

all right anyway y'all

all right two people request to join.

Cam, go ahead.

Haas.

Yeah, what's up?

It's KB. please let me back into server

bro you keep

blowing up and melting down

and saying crazy shit all the time

it's happened too many times bro

you have to promise to never again

do anything say anything to us

there's somebody in my

chat that has a Karl Marx profile picture.

They have a hammer and sickle.

Hey, they're really, really, you know,

we're really confused.

Hey, buddy, we get it.

You're trying to virtue signal that you're a communist.

The problem is you're 15 and you're a larper. You're

a larperer.

Guy literally just

found out about Karl Marx yesterday.

He's mega-communist.

Buddy, listen, you're on the Reddit level of you

just found out about socialism two days ago.

The people that created

mega-communism like me, we are elder wizards. We're sorcerers. We're literally on a higher

level of scholarship and expertise. And we are advanced dragons. You are a little lizard

and we're advanced dragons. Don't even talk to me. Finish high school.

And then I'll teach you about Maga-Communism. Finish high school. Go to bed. You have to wake up tomorrow for class. Do you not?

Go to bed.

Before you put maga communism in quotes as if you're mocking literal dragons and you're a little wizard of Marx.

We are dragons of Marxism.

You're a little pissant lizard who found out about socialism two days ago.

And I'm a sorcerer, bro.

What are you talking about?

Maga-communism is an extremely

refined, articulate,

advanced meme, and extremely refined, articulate, advanced, meme engineered.

It was, you have no idea the level of Marxism we are on to create something like that.

We are on such a level of Ma Li, Marxism Leninism and the science immortal science we are on such a level you can't even fathom it in your head because you're pathetic now go to bed boy because you have to wake up for your school bus. Don't forget to pack lunch.

When you finish high school, you can learn about maga-communism.

But you just found out about socialism two days ago.

Same people who fought... Yeah, we get it it you went on your school library on the computer and you looked at uh wikipedia where they lied about us forging signatures and you think that's a

talking point we get it dude you went to the school library and you went on's a talking point. We get it, dude. You went to the school library

and you went on Wikipedia

and you think you know about ACP.

Go to bed.

You're not old enough.

The average debt... Yeah, that we get it we're a democrat we understand tanky maxer go ahead you better be the right kind of tanky what are we supposed to do when communists capitulate to liberal narratives about Pol Pot and, you know, the DPRK, for example?

I don't think you could say that name on TikTok, bro. I don't think you could say that name.

Oh, my apologies.

But, you know, the glasses come off for this one.

That's all I'll say.

The glasses come off for this one.

This guy's on a power level.

Bro, it says Korean Bolshe level. Bro, it's just Korean Bolshevik.

Bro, chill.

I don't need that constantly.

You're a Democrat.

You're a Democrat.

You're a Democrat.

You're a liberal.

You're a Democrat.

You're a nerd. You found out about socialism two days ago because you're a Democrat. Go over Kamala Harris. Socialism is when Obama plus love? You're a Mickey Mouse Democrat on crack and you think that's socialism. It's not. Socialism is

brutal and it's dark and it's hardcore. You're not cut out for it. Go back to the Young Democrats

Club. This is some dark ass Democrats club this is some dark

ass shit this is some

dark ass shit we're guided by the red star

this is some dark ass shit

go back to your Mickey Mouse Democrat

Club

like you're not gonna make it, bro.

You're not gonna make it, little bro.

You're not cut out for this.

I'm sorry.

I took a pill in Ibiza

To tell Say Lafowas

We darken

Yeah, we on some dark villainous shit

Honestly

Because you guys

are Mickey Mouse

Socialists we have nothing

to do with you

we're on some brutal

dark ass shit

like go to

go to Russia right now

look at the Soviet legacy

look at Soviet culture.

That shit...

That shit was base.

That shit was...

That was...

Yes, there was a high note, but there was also a low note, and it combined both, and it was harmonious.

It was rugged.

It had nothing to do with your Mickey Mouse

fantasy of, you know,

Barney the Dinosaur socialism. Go back

to watching Telitubby. Stop confusing that

for our tradition.

Soviet Union was some heavy

metal ass shit, all right?

You go to the Moscow subway, and you look at the statues, and it's just, you don't see anything of, you know, this Mickey Mouse.

What is this ugly art style that they corporate Memphis art?

Nothing like that.

It evokes nothing like that.

Sit down.

HGH.

This crazy crackhead is back.

HGH, what does your name mean, HGH, this crazy crackhead is back. HGH, what does your name mean HGH?

So, once you try to tell the truth.

Are you on HGH?

Absolutely.

The best.

Only the best.

Okay, well, if that's the premise, continue, I guess. I mean, we don't know. We were dealing with the best. Okay. Well, if that's the premise, continue, I guess.

I mean, we don't know.

We were dealing with a crazy guy here.

Go ahead.

Well, the reason why this is my name is we try to tell people about the amazing man in Russia with the mustache and, you know, the amazing

Chinese man in China.

You can name

Stalin and Mao on TikTok.

Yeah, Staling and Mao. Yeah, TikTok

doesn't like that. And, you know,

yeah.

Go ahead.

Well, yeah, I just want to like ask a question how can we get these people to understand the truth about stalin and mal because they think they're just awful people

when they were just lied to from Wikipedia.

Yeah, Stalin and Mao were great, correct?

Yeah, absolutely.

So what do we disagree?

This 15-year-old keeps going.

We know nobody wants conservative and socially.

Bro, go to the, do wants conservative and socially. Bro, go

to the, do you think DPRK was conservative

or liberal culturally, if you had to choose?

Like, stop the

delusion, bro. Stop to, I'm literally going to

the DPRK soon.

I'll ask them any question you have.

Do you, what do you think about furries and all this stuff?

HGH, bro, you're on our side then, right?

So what's the debate?

I didn't.

I saw you had some people come up. My debate, stop doing that HGH.

It's wicked-ass shit.

It's going to lead to-

It's the best.

It's going to lead to Gynacomis DLA later in your life.

Don't do that.

You know what?

It'll be worth it.

I got to go out badass, you know?

Okay, goodbye forever.

Don't be, don't do that.

No, I'm going to, I tell everyone what's going on.

I say, look, on the internet, I think it's mainly European, honestly, it's always European leftists

that are on some.

They're trifling.

Americans are chill.

It's just always these weird people

from Scandinavia.

What party are you in?

Tell me what party you're in?

Tell me what party you're in.

What party are you in? What party are you in?

What's your party?

What political party are you in?

Are you in the, the high school debate club?

Is that your party

okay so it's the bro

Korean bulls like literally chill

he's in the high school debate club

versus the ACP well that's a tough lineup

parties are ineffective

what is this ditty blood talking about bro Well, that's a tough lineup. Parties are ineffective.

What is this Diddy Blood talking about, bro?

What is this Diddy Epstein Blood talking about?

Parties are, what is this Diddy Blit?

What is his Diddy Epstein Blood talking about?

What is his Diddy Epstein Blood talking about? Bro, what are you talking about? Parties are ineffective. That's some literal Diddy Epstein type shit. I don't know what to tell you.

Literal Diddy Epstein. What is this Diddy Epstein blood talking about?

Parties are ineffective.

Bro, you just discredit yourself in front of the world.

Sit down.

You're done.

It's over.

You have any ideas on how to reach rural people, especially in the American South?

Be honest with yourself, and that's the first step to being honest with everyone.

And don't be augistic and impis impositive

just

tell the fucking truth

you know like what are the problems

facing people rural people in the South

understand those problems

and articulate them in such a way that convinces people we can do

something about it um left comms debate where they at where Where they at? Where they at?

They never debate.

Of course they don't.

People genuinely cannot think parties will get us to socialism

you know what's going to get us to socialism brandon torres

hello recently you made on July 24th

20204 the

American Communist Party

led by Jackson Hinkog

launched and

Sorry what

On July 24th, 20204,

Top day talk for her on social media. You should open up a chat panel.

How do I do that?

I do, no, people can.

People can speak.

People can speak.

People can absolutely speak some people can absolutely speak Sleazy talking nonsense.

Some guy named the goon master, Haas, why communist?

His name is the goon master.

He's asking me this question.

Why are you here?

Hit the request.

How do I make it easy for people to request?

Honestly, this is like, how do I make it eat?

How do I do this? How do I do I make it eat? How do I do this?

How do I do anything on this shit?

Honestly.

Triarch. Yo, what's up, Paz?

Yo, what up?

Nice to meet you, bro.

You too, me too.

I had a question for you.

What is it you think about the coming of ideologies today that are considered to be past the political paradigms of the first, second, and third dimension of the political spectrum?

In America, there are none.

This is a speculative proposal by Mr. Dugian, which...

Well, don't you think you could be past Duginian philosophy?

Because I think of what position might be more than erasianism, no?

I'm I am not a do.

I'm as much of a douganist as Marx was a shellingist.

Makes sense, makes sense.

I was just curious because although I'm not a dougainest I do

believe in his framework no I well look I I have written about it in my substack called

the Brahmins of democracy where I propose what he means is Mao Zittong thought

I see

I see that the fourth

political theory is just Marxism

Leninism

Well

Oh no

I'm not I'm not sure

Once of you can still hear this

Once of you can still hear this Once of you can still hear this

On the yellow

On the green place

On the green place

Because my shit just said zero

Okay you're good

Good

You're good good

All right

We're good

We're good

We're good

We're good

Yeah I was I suppose I'm just uh curious because um in dougan's in dougan's ideological beliefs he believes that uh we can transcend past the paradigms of a capital capitalism communism and fascismism. I think we can push it past

third positionism. Liberalism,

his paradigm is liberalism, communism,

fascism. My critique

is that he conflates the communism

with social

democracy.

And I just, and in that paradigm paradigm there's a straight line from liberalism

social democracy to fascism which is true but i think that marxism leninism is the more advanced

thing which is different bolivism it It's completely different than social democracy.

And in this sense,

yes.

So that's my basic response.

All right.

Someone in his name is Nick Fuentes-Rourg. All right. Someone

His name is Nick Fuentes rule

Stream for the Unemployed.

A Nick Fuentes fan is saying this. All right, I think we're going to wrap this up, guys.

I could do this all night, but I have to sleep.

I hope you guys found it enlightening. somebody name um just joined i don't know who you are, but I don't like your name.

Get out of here.

You're not welcome here.

Anyway, guys, uh, we're ending it right now.

Hope you had fun.

One more TikTok debate. Okay, one more person can request who's debating and i'll i'll do it

there's nobody's requesting and i it's quite late actually bro korea and bolshek i've given you literally hundreds of chances you constantly constantly go over the tOS line

just stop just let me think for a second.

You need to truly do something to prove you'll never break TOS again.

Goose.

How's it going?

Awful.

I just had a question

because I'm interested in

ACP and I see a lot of your members

and I talk to some of your members

You live in America?

Yes, yes, I'm from Buffalo.

All right.

I

I wonder how you coincide religion with dialectical materialism

um yeah the the dichotomy is not religion versus dialectical materialism.

The dichotomy is dialectical materialism versus Greek pederastry.

And religion can either rest upon the foundation of Greek pedirastry or dialectical materialism?

That's a good response because a lot of the Marxists I

talk to will

debate that and just say

that religion doesn't cannot coincide

with dialectical materialism.

Yeah, but they don't know what they're talking about. They're LARPers. They don't know anything.

Yeah, that's why I appreciate the ACP.

You know, because it definitely, you know, you say the Maga communism, but it does fit the American culture.

And I appreciate how you guys stay true to Lenin Marxism,

you know?

Marxism, Leninism.

All right, man.

See you.

Bye-bye. all right uh ticotkers um bye

bye on ticotkers uh i'll still be on a green place but ending this tictac

ticktackers are so funny, they think that they actually matter.

They don't matter.

They're like, oh, this is for us.

This is just us.

This is.

They have no idea.

They have no idea that they're just being that they're just

fish in the sea and that we're casting a wide net on a boat tictackers have no idea Your name is Nick Fuentes rules

Let me guess you're fat

And you are

A brown white nationalist

I just see a fat ass I don't even see any I just see a fat ass

I don't even see any

I just don't have no need to respond to a fat person

What the hell

Kick went wrong

Had trouble loading

Huh We are experiencing some errors went wrong. Had trouble loading.

Huh?

We are experiencing some errors at the moment.

I can't even open my... Okay.

I mean, I hope I didn't get banned or something.

Are we good, guys?

We're good.

I can't access the website of kick.com.

That is quite fascinating.

Oh, I can't log in.

Huh?

Honeypot not found.

Am I cooked?

Yeah, I'm logged out of kick.

Okay, I don't know what's going on, guys.

We'll see.

Bye-bye. I'll see you guys. See you guys Sunday. Bye-bye.

I'll see you guys.

See you guys Sunday.

Bye-bye.

I hope you had a...