IRAN WAR UPDATES | INTENSE DEBATES

What is up, y'all?

What is up, y'all?

What is up, y'all?

What is up, y'all?

Hey guys, I have a lot of things to talk about.

First thing I'm gonna talk about is my beard.

I'm looking a little scruffy, and I'll tell you why.

All right, you see this shit?

My barber, he took an electric trimmer.

He cuts a line right here.

He says, Bro, stop shaving it down like this.

Shave it up to here.

Sparrow, what's up?

So basically, I gotta grow this shit out.

But it looks like a ball sack and shit, right?

So, sorry.

Anyway, I just wanted to like apologize for that.

Anyway, guys, uh

We have a lot to talk about.

There's some interesting lesser updates we'll save.

I am going to have a creative confront the chairman this stream.

I'm actually going to give you guys something I've never given you before, ever is democracy.

Okay, so ones if you want a traditional confront the chairman, it's going to be on TikTok either way.

Ones if you want it traditional style where it's adversarial.

Twos if you would prefer more of an ask-me-anything type of thing.

I actually enjoy the TikToks.

I enjoy responding to questions.

I feel like they're just more.

Here's why.

Here's why.

No, no, I'll tell you why.

I feel like if I do more of an ask you ask me anything thing, hostile people will show up anyway, and I'll give them the chance to debate.

It's just that I feel like, in the absence of people who want to debate and be hostile, we could still actually just end up having a pretty informative educational stream.

Plus, I don't know what the fuck people need to know, honestly.

Sometimes, I mean, I'm going to talk about something pretty important today.

But I don't always know like I don't always know like at what levels y'all are at and if there's things that are like boggling your mind and you just want some clarification on it.

I know we're supposed to do the Patreon Q and A's

Well, this will be a version of that in a way, right?

And just in the absence of people who don't have the balls to debate, maybe I think we're living in a different age, honestly.

I feel like the generation that came after me, or my generation, I'm kind of on the border, they're kind of less confrontational when you think about it.

And their way of doing conference, you got to ease people in.

You got to ease people in.

Will Eddie be there?

You know what?

I'll ask him right now.

I had him plan for him to, but I I don't wanna

Uh

I don't wanna force

If he's just chilling and relaxing, I don't want him to have to go out of his way.

I'll just ask him, I'll say.

Yo

Alright.

Um so yeah, I told him.

Yeah, but I honestly I think that the ti I think I'll probably I don't know guys I'm kind of in the at the point where every single stream that I do I want to do the TikToks like at the tail end.

I enjoy them.

I feel like they're fruitful.

I feel like they're productive.

I feel like they're educational and uh I remember when we started infrared I was kind of on that energy where I would just be sitting here asking people's questions about shit answering people's questions and uh it just led to higher rates of literacy, you know.

Plus it helps grow the TikTok, you know, which is a dead I don't have anything on TikTok.

I have like nothing.

Alright y'all, so I don't know if you know what's going on, guys, but um so, okay, where do we begin?

So to uh to to draw some threads together that

I've been I've been dangling, so to speak.

Since I came back from Russia, I told you guys about something hilarious, which was that the DHS was defunded and therefore I wasn't given a hard time at customs.

I think that's my theory of why.

So when I came back from Russia, I was thinking, Oh my god, I'm gonna be kept for hours, maybe up to a day.

You know, I just came back from Russia, oh my god, and I just uh hung out with Chris Halali, the scary guy.

And Jackson Hinkle, the wanted international terrorist criminal, anti Semite, Nazi Tulsi Gabbard agent who works for Russia, China, Tulsi Gabbard, um, the CIA and the bigotry uh police who are bigots.

They're just they're like, you know, the man, you know, like

Transphobic uh

People in suits and ties and shit, right?

'Cause that's really how it works.

So, I thought it was going to be a big problem, but it turns out it wasn't because the DHS was defunded.

Turns out it's still defunded, and therefore the TSA is defunded.

And at airports across the country, people are-I mean, the lines are crazy.

Travel is this is like logistically gonna be a problem.

I'm gonna be in St.

Louis next month.

I'm gonna be in a lot of places next month, actually.

I'm gonna be traveling.

I don't fucking know how that's going to work.

I'm going to New York in May, by the way.

Going to New York City.

For all those who are...

Hollis, why don't you come to New York?

I'm coming.

I'm coming to New York.

Anyway, I'm coming to New York.

But we have all these travel plans for this year.

And travel is being heavily obstructed because of the government shutdown regarding the TSA.

And the lines are crazy at airports across the country.

I'm just saying that.

They're crazy.

So, what's my theory, though?

Why am I talking about this?

As if it's relevant and if it's topical?

Well.

I think I'm a conspiracy theorist a little bit, and I want to say maybe they're doing a test run to see how the nation reacts to the widespread inconvenience.

And later first inconvenience and later inaccessibility altogether of regular flight travel across the country in preparation for and this is going to be something I want to talk about in extensive detail the upcoming energy crisis as a consequence of the war in Iran.

Uh this is very serious and I don't know why people underestimate it and I talked about it today in my post where I I said this is gonna lead effectively all world history right now looks like it's going in the direction of a new Dark Ages.

Yeah.

Now when I say New Dark Ages, a lot of people are super confused.

Because they're just like, What do you mean?

You think things are just gonna get really ugly and really bad and really gruesome and really

No, I yes, actually, but I mean something a little bit more specific by the technical term dark ages, which requires me to go give kind of an extensive lecture on or basically an outline of my understanding of the history of civilizations and the different vectors of development in the world history of Eurasia and of world civilization.

I say Eurasia, this tendency could have propped up elsewhere and in other places, but there's only one place for certain I can confidently say we've had dark ages, which is Eurasia, right?

So, what is a dark age?

What is that exactly?

So, first of all, let's anticipate and be frank about what's happening, some of which I've talked about.

I talked about after I came back from Russia and I heard about reports coming from the front lines.

I just talked to people and they were telling me what's going on basically and why the front has stalled like it's never stalled before, actually, like in ways it hasn't before.

And the reason the front in Donbass and in Ukraine has basically stalled is because the FPV drones have made the operational deployment and movement of military personnel and vehicles and infrastructure impossible.

Cheap drones can just blow up tanks worth tens of thousands, okay?

Hundred dollar drones can blow up a fucking tank worth one hundred K, okay?

This creates an economically unfeasible and just impossible environment to operate on if you're a conventional military.

And I talked about how this is leading to a new kind of military point of view and logic: we have to start treating electrical and energy grids as very much more relevant factors of warfare than before, meaning we need to take control and be able to shut down at will entire energy, electrical, and communications infrastructure that these FPV drones actually depend upon.

There's fiber optic drones, there's all these other kinds of drones.

The drones are making warfare.

Conventional warfare, by the way, used to be gas-powered.

It never used to be electric.

Okay?

The use of electronics in warfare, of course, became vital in the Cold War period.

But we're talking about World War II, and you know, we're still kind of within the paradigm of heavy gas machine-powered military infrastructure.

And the electronic infrastructure is just kind of like this extra layer of control that's added to these otherwise quite simple, you know, diesel gas-fueled machines, okay?

Tanks, airplanes, helicopters, armored carriers, armored vehicles, and so on and so on.

So, this is a much more base layer of military infrastructure.

The Cold War added electronics in warfare mainly as these kind of secondary control systems that were used to guide the more kind of conventional Fordist age military infrastructure, right?

So, if you're following me.

That's the story so far as far as the status of electronics within warfare.

And that's been the case, okay?

Most military infrastructure created by the military-industrial complex in both the United States and Russia is still following the paradigm where electronics are a kind of secondary layer added on top of a more kind of archaic machines, basically, tanks, missiles, aerial combat vehicles, and so on and so on.

And don't get me wrong, I mean, the very sophisticated technologies we're talking about here, but ultimately, it's run by an engine that's fueled by gas and it blows shit up.

It's used to just blow things up with gunpowder and so on and so on.

Conventional explosive devices, whatever.

So, the entire military industrial complex, both in Russia, the United States, and the world at large, basically rests upon that premise.

Now, why am I so confident that the ladder of escalation as a consequence of the dynamics of the Ukraine war are basically going to lead to a scenario where

It's gonna start becoming easy to take out electrical grids, and that's gonna basically change the nature of civilization itself.

So the rise of FPV drones and drone technologies did create a game changer, which is that these are deadly military hardware that is entirely electronic.

Drones, to my knowledge, are electronic.

They're not powered by gas.

The larger ones, I actually don't know.

Let me look this up right now.

Are Shahids fully electronic?

No, they're not.

They use a gas-powered combustion engine.

Fair enough.

But the smaller drones and the FPV drones, a lot of them are just purely electronic.

And these are cheap, sometimes Chinese, cheaply mass manufactured electronic devices that are much cheaper, I think.

Which are very uh which don't cost a lot of money, okay?

They don't use a lot of gas though.

Okay, good.

So you're talking about d you know, um drones that cost a few hundred bucks, maybe a few thousand dollars, which can quite very easily take out very expensive military hardware.

So the economics of it is very simple.

It's not viable.

If you're the military industrial complex and the state is out of its budget paying top dollar, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands for armored carriers and vehicles and tanks and pickup trucks, whatever,

Even helicop, I don't know if drones have taken out helicopters.

I'm probably sure they have, at least disrupted them.

You know, very cheap electronic devices, first of all, have two advantages.

One, economically, they're very cheap.

And two, because they are so precision-guided through information and communications technology, they have a much more dynamic ability to maneuver through battle space.

They're small.

They're lightweight.

They're small.

And there's precision pinpoint remote control.

And none of these things exist for conventional military hardware.

Okay.

So we're entering an age basically.

What's up, Kay?

What's up?

Where the entire paradigm of military technology since the 1930s, since the age of Fordism, is finally now coming to an end.

So since the 1930s, you had a Fordist-based paradigm of military hardware and infrastructure where electronic equipment and electronics and communications technologies, radar, whatever, these were used to control as control interfaces.

Now the thing that was a control interface is replacing the hardware itself almost entirely through the rise of autonomous weapons and drones and stuff, right?

So, Apache, don't ask me random fucking questions when I'm talking about some specific ass shit.

What the fuck are we talking about here?

Anyway, um.

Uh, so so we're looking for the for the first time.

This is now happening now.

That basically, since the 1930s, the last century, the fundamental paradigm of military technology and hardware didn't change, it just kind of was modulated and um and and uh optimized right through the use of information technology and electronics.

Now, the information electron technology and electronics, which is much cheaper and is produced in vastly larger quantities, and also there's a blurring of lines between civilian and military hardware here, is replacing that foundation.

So, the advantage is that it has the full advantage, the full

Disposal of electrical grids, energy grids.

Obviously, you just plug it in and charge it.

It uses electricity.

And then, additionally, you have the advantage of far more control and maneuverability of battle space.

Again, it's like it's the dynamic ability to send a tweet somewhere, send a post somewhere, send a YouTube video somewhere, whatever.

You can maneuver through real-life space with such direct, remote-controlled precision.

Using, you know, information, energy, electronic infrastructure, right?

And uh okay, so who's gonna win out in this battle?

Is it gonna be the new age electronic military infrastructure or is it gonna be the old age military hardware?

Ultimately, of course, the new thing is gonna win.

I mean, we know that.

But in the short term.

The old world is not going to go down without causing a lot of trouble and a lot of disruptions, so to speak.

So from the basic vantage point of common sense economics and uh

Just just

Common sense making sure the balance sheet is straight, so to speak.

We're not pissing away and throwing away our resources and money.

What states are going to increasingly start to do is

Basically, treat entire energy and electrical and information grids as dangerous kind of things that need to be shut down or limited or neutralized in some capacity to reassert the supremacy of the old military infrastructure over the new kind.

Meaning, look, the Ukraine, Russia, Ukraine, war, a lot of the time they're using Soviet age military hardware, okay?

And the United States is the same.

A lot of our military infrastructure came from the 20th century as well.

This is the bedrock of a very, very strong kind of institutional military doctrine.

And there's a stubbornness and obviously there's a conservatism there because there's an abundance of this shit that was never actually used in a conventional war during the Cold War where it was supposed to.

And the idea that all this is just going to get pissed away and destroyed and thrown away because of these cheap small drones that can cause so much chaos and stuff, it's unacceptable to the major superpowers, both Russia and the United States.

It's completely unacceptable.

You think they're just going to throw away a century's worth, basically?

Of military infrastructure because overnight China disrupted literally everything about how everything fucking works.

No.

So, we have a strong material, infrastructural, and then therefore it's upstream institutional pressure to basically say, hey, you know what?

It's wonderful that we live in this new global age of unlimited interconnectivity and everyone's holding hands and we're dancing together and it's we're all singing kumbaya, whatever.

But fuck that shit, right?

We're gonna fucking shut the internet down.

We're gonna fucking shut the electricity off.

We're gonna fucking shut the entire energy and electrical grids off to reassert control and to end this chaos.

Because we're not just gonna let an entire century get fucking wiped out.

Now, a few weeks ago, this actually happened in Russia.

Can you believe it?

In Russia, because of the increased frequency of attacks by FPV and autonomous drones from the Ukrainian terrorists, the Russian government in many parts of Moscow straight up shut the internet down.

If you could believe it, it's a big debate going on in Russia right now, by the way, if you don't know this.

The Russian government has banned Telegram.

They're trying to completely get rid of Telegram.

It's pissing off a lot of people in Russia.

It's even pissing off people at the front.

But the logic of the Russian government is that, look, the Telegram and it's being used by the Ukrainian terrorists and by NATO and whatever, you know, as a weapon of war to locate people's locations and track them and yada yada yada.

And then internet was temporarily shut down in huge parts of Moscow, led to a lot of outcry and anger from the public.

But justifiably, because there's no way to get these drones under control that are just constantly blowing up shit in Moscow.

They're just constantly engaged in these terrorist operations and attacks.

So how do you stop it?

Well, you got to shut the means of the communication off.

And to do that, everyone's going to take a hit.

There's no way to just isolate the deadly technology from the civilian technology.

So, Ukraine.

Sorry, for Russia's already dealing with this dilemma.

There's a strong basis of civilization.

Uh that is primarily non-informational and non-electronic.

We're and and that by the way, you know what this includes is human physical.

Uh whatever, the biosphere, whatever, what is it fucking retard, Foucault?

What did he call it?

Something like biopower, that there's this layer of existence, which is human biology, which is also not electronic or informational.

So, I'm not saying the Russians are reactionary for doing what they did.

On the contrary, I'm saying this is a real existential dilemma.

There's a kind of substrate foundation of the infrastructure of civilization: gas, electricity, oil, human beings, human bodies, health, whatever.

The internet and all these other things are a stack on top of that, right?

That's what it's supposed to be, apparently, right?

And now we're looking at a conflict between those two things.

So this is kind of the first human versus AI conflict, if you want to think about it that way, like from the Terminator.

If you need if you're like a Reddit brain retard and you need me to explain this to you, because you're such a retarded baby and you have no other way to understand it, this is like the Terminator and it's the humans versus the AI.

Basically, right?

But no, there's like this metabolic rift that has been drawn between two eras, right?

Because of that.

Okay, so I've been talking about this for a long time.

I've been talking about this for a long time.

It's not new.

But what's changed?

Well,

When you tie that with the coming energy crisis, you're looking at a similar effect.

The disruption of the global oil market and the disruption

Of widespread accessibility to fossil fuels and traditional systems of um

Of

uh energy consumption basically, which is, yeah, fossil fueled, uh is going to be a disruption on society that is measurably and considerably

More dramatic than the Covid lockdowns were.

And if you want to be a Klaus Schwabian conspiracy theorist, are you ready for Z new world?

Like, if you want to be on that kind of shit, it kind of feels like it's gearing up for the great reset when you think about it.

All the shit that's being pushed.

I'm not even saying it's bad that's being pushed, but I'm just saying it is being pushed institutionally on some level.

Electric cars, solar, all this kind of stuff.

I'm not saying it's a conspiracy, it's just a tendency of civilization, really.

Uh those are not going to become truly prolific until a major metabolic rift or cataclysmic event happens like COVID lockdowns were.

That make them necessary.

And I think something like that is going to happen.

I think we're looking at something like the emergence of a scenario.

Where basically traditional twentieth century based centralized electricity and energy systems and all the stacks that upon which they rest

are going to be disrupted objectively.

The two kind of accelerants to that are proliferation of lethal drone technologies, which hasn't happened in the United States yet.

We'll see.

By the way, we'll see.

And then secondarily, the energy crisis that's a consequence of the Iran war.

And this is what I think is objectively, in a scientific sense, going to lead to a new Dark Ages, at least in North America, probably in Europe, but especially North America.

We're entering a new Dark Ages, and I can explain why I think that.

First of all, I want to point out the irony, which is that Iran is at the center of all this.

Iran is the civilization of light.

Iran is the birthplace of Zoraster.

Iran is the birthplace of Cyrus the Great, the birthplace of the entire kind of cosmology and paradigm of light versus darkness.

and the kind of association of the morality with the light and with the kingship and and so on and authority with light.

Well, this is quite literally true in the twenty first century, in the sense that political authority lies with the sovereign that can keep the lights on.

We're looking at in Cuba, you've seen the footage of intense blackouts constantly just plaguing the island.

That's going to come to more places than just Cuba because of this energy crisis, frankly.

And since the 20th century, I have a theory.

The source of political sovereignty is actually rooted in light, literal light, like the ability to maintain centralized electrical and energy grids is the fundamental premise and foundation of modern statehood, at least Fordist post-Fordist era modern statehood.

And

The comparison you could draw maybe is the centralized political infrastructure of irrig great water works and irrigation canals.

You know, the source of the sovereignty of the Chinese Emperor, the source of the sovereignty of the Egyptian pharaoh, and and and the power of the kings of Babylon and so on, even in Persia and so on and so on.

It all lied in the state's ability to maintain centralized hydraulic and irrigation systems.

Okay?

Because back then water was energy.

Water wasn't just water, which we need biologically.

Water was also energy, okay?

It powered everything.

It was the source of power, was water, right?

This is the kind of hydraulic civilization theory.

However

Uh so there is uh so there is just kind of a continuous progress.

Of an integral logic of merging together, empires getting bigger and bigger and fusing together, and this is basically the trajectory of civilization for thousands of years in the Fertile Crescent, culminating in Cyrus the Great, right?

Who united the world, the known world.

So, why were the Greeks these barbaric Jacobian

Snow monkeys running around in mountains fucking everything up for everybody.

What was so wrong with these Greeks?

These Yucubians?

They're just running around.

They're shitting everything up for everyone.

Cyrus the Great, he had a good thing going.

He united the whole world.

And then these Greeks, they're just this aberration.

They're just this abomination.

They're a usurious, quote-unquote, civilization.

They don't invent anything.

They steal everything from everyone, from the Egyptians, from the Persians, from the Babylonians.

They have nothing.

They don't even know how to wash themselves.

They're just these savages.

who s somehow created this kind of pretense to civilization, these usurious maritime city states that are f filled with fat pedophiles that purely depend on slave labor.

Um and there's they don't have a freehold culture, freehold civilization.

It's all slaves that do everything while fat pedophiles sit in urban cities and Plato is raping children and Socrates is doing the same and Aristotle's doing the same and the Greeks are just these pir piratical, usurious they're like the Israel, right?

No, but in all seriousness.

What happened?

Okay, well, first of all, the Bronze Age collapse happens, which is I know if you're a real historian, you're going to problematomize that term.

I don't give a fuck.

I'm marking a specific thing that happened.

Everyone agrees something happened.

Following the collapse of the traditional palatial style civilization of political authority being based upon centralized economic and hydraulic infrastructure, you have a fracturing of imperial authority into various different kind of mafioso and tribes and feudal-like families.

So this is what historians call the Greek Dark Ages.

And it's out of the Greek Dark Ages that the classical age of Greece, as we know it, comes to be.

Now for all they that they stole and they it was just outright theft and for as wicked and awful as these savage Greek snow monkeys running around just pooping everywhere and killing each other and raping children and enslaving everyone

As awful as they were, what did they actually contribute to civilization when you think about it?

What was the actual contribution?

Well, I asked none other than Paul Cockshot for for this this question, earnestly and sincerely.

And he sent me a book which led me down a rabbit hole, of course.

It was a good book actually about the Greeks' actual contributions to science and and technology.

And it kind of does line up with the hydraulic theory of civilization promoted by that one guy in the fifties, I forgot his name.

But what it was, was that the Greeks pioneered decentralized hydraulic energy and water hydraulic systems for the control of water, right?

There's certain ways to lift water.

I mean, they did actually innovate in terms of decentralized hydraulic technology, which simultaneously added a deeper level of the ability to control the flow and use of water.

And the reason the Greeks experienced the Dark Age was because they were exposed to the sum total.

Put it this way: Is everyone fucking listening to me?

Is everyone listening?

Ones if you're listening.

Because I don't want stupid people drooling right now who are not listening.

I want everyone to be listening.

Ones if you're listening.

All right, stop.

Stop with the ones.

I heard it loud and clear.

Okay, so um the Greeks were snow monkeys, Yacubian snow monkeys.

They were living in caves, running around naked.

They were savages for hundreds of thousands of years, basically, right?

Like all of Europe.

But uh what happened?

What changed?

Well the sum total of civilization, uh tec science, technology, culture, you name it.

Uh was directly imported to the Greeks.

And other peninsular people throughout history.

But the Greeks.

lived in a geography that was mountainous.

They had natural protection from any kind of attempt to enforce centralized political systems.

Then they had the double advantage of be uh being a rainwater civilization.

They had a regular kind of source of water that came from the sky and therefore not a need like the Babylonians did living in more arid climates for centralized hydraulic infrastructure.

And it's the combination of these two factors, these three factors, that led to the Greek Dark Ages.

You see, we speak of a Greek Dark Ages, but what's stupid kind of about the notion of Dark Ages is it implies there was a light age in that region before.

There was never a light age.

Before everyone was running around living in caves, throwing poop at each other.

Okay, what happened is that.

Some um Phoenician or something made the mistake of introducing very advanced technology to these savages, these Greeks.

And and and I by the way, um if you're Greek and offended, I'm literally joking about all this shit.

Please stop g stop your you know, you you don't need to be asshurt about it, okay?

You don't need to be asshurt.

You can put your fucking band-aid on and get your fucking tissue.

I'm literally just joking.

But yeah, there is some Yacoub, some arc.

This is the truth of the story of Yacoub, by the way.

Some Phoenician Yacoub.

basically gave like Prometheus the some access to the real civilization which was all happening on the Fertile Crescent right and from the Nile all the way to the Zagros Mountains right

That is where you have millennia, millennia of civilization.

It took thousands of years.

See, we get this myth that the Greeks just invented everything.

No, they didn't.

They just stole everything.

Before them, it was just thousands of years of shit going on in the wider world, right?

All of this was suddenly and very drastically and abruptly in a very comparatively shorter timeframe introduced to the Greeks.

So.

Uh

What what's the comparison?

Okay, the comparison is of course, it's like Ukrainians.

Honestly, Ukrainians very primitive.

They're not very primitive they're very primitive.

Okay, I'm not gonna insult them, but I'll just say they were very primitive.

And then very suddenly and abruptly, the entire breadth of

All of this kind of Chinese world technology was just thrown to them, the drone technology, right?

And that fucking it's like that's what created the the dark age of Ukraine, right?

So if you think about this in the Greek context, something similar happens.

All the science and technology that was created by the hydraulic civilization, so to speak I know that term's problematic, but I'm covering the the Oriental civilization, so to speak.

Was taken by the Greeks and used to create decentralized hydraulic systems.

They already had the natural advantage.

of regular sources of water that came from the sky.

But with the addition of all of the scientific technology of millennia and millennia of civilizational development at their disposal, they could basically take that

And use it to kind of intensify and kind of innovate in putting the rainwater that they're getting to work.

And that's the real technology they innovated.

They took something that was centralized, that was a product of a centralized civil and unified division of labor, and they used it and put it in the service of kind of the intensive cultivation of decentralized hydraulic systems.

And that's why there was a Greek Dark Ages.

That's why there's any Dark Ages ever in history.

In Europe, something similar happened.

Okay, you have two, you have three main sources of influence.

One of these is very broad, but I don't care.

Okay, you have classical Rome, the Western Roman Empire, then you have the Byzantine Empire, then you have the Islamic world.

Okay, these three centralized political states.

Politics, decentralized polities, created a kind of infrastructural base, science, technology, culture, and so on.

And the European Yakubians took all of that.

They just inherited it without any effort.

And what did they create from it?

Well, they created windmill technologies.

They created all sorts of decentralized hydraulic technologies, which was literally the reason for the European Dark Ages.

The reason, what is a dark age?

A dark age happens basically.

When the integral sum total culmination of all the knowledge and science and technology of civilization.

um which was a product of a unified division of labor, intensifies the kind of vector of differentiation and political fragmentation through the decentralization of um

of of uh technology basically.

That's the best way I would define a dark age.

You know, in and in one uh integral totality or division of labor, totality of labor.

You have a kind of base forces of production.

Now, innovations in technology could do two things.

You could create a new, more effective, more powerful, centralized base of the productive forces that still unify society as one complex division of labor, or you have an opposing tendency.

which actually accelerates political fragmentation through the use of um decentralized uh technology, right?

Which creates the possibility of independent, self sustaining communities

And also uh military military uh defensive capabilities for small statelets and polities.

This is what creates a dark age.

The essence of a dark age is basically the inability to maintain the integral division of labor of all society

into one empire, so to speak.

And it's almost like a kind of time travel when you think about it, right?

There's this cyclical process of a continual revolution in the productive forces across all of history, by the way, right?

Do I need MS Paint?

There's this kind of continuous cyclical process of the renewal and development of the productive forces that happens across history.

I'm talking about like in an Oriental empire, for example.

But if a Yacubian snow ape takes a time machine, they can kind of intervene at one of the decisive moments in this cyclical process and disrupt the cycle and basically take the culmination of all known science, culture, and technology, which ultimately, for it to advance and progress, depends upon a unified, integral division of labor, meaning it depends upon a centralized empire and imperial authority and so on.

But if you can intervene at this critical process and import somehow all of this kind of culmination of science and technology to create decentralized systems which then don't reintegrate, right?

That's what basically creates the premise of a dark age.

And when you think about it, this makes a lot of sense because dark ages also rest upon the premise of usury.

Now, what is the source of usury, right?

How is usury possible?

In a hydraulic civilization or a civilization with centralized energy infrastructure, usury is very difficult.

Why?

Because if all of society has to cooperate to maintain a kind of shared foundation of material existence, more or less, then one segment of society emiserating the other in a kind of unlimited debt bondage relationship becomes kind of impossible.

But if all of the kind of technology becomes decentralized and militarized as well, then you're going to have a social Darwinism play out where there's going to be winners and there's going to be losers.

There's going to be statelets and communities that are more successful and some that are less successful.

Sometimes for reasons entirely owed to random natural factors.

It doesn't matter what the reasons are.

Like there wasn't enough rainwater in this shitty village versus this other one, right?

And that creates relationships of dependency and control and.

Enslavement of man by man, more or less, with debt, right?

That's the foundation.

And from debt comes slavery, the institution of slavery, by the way, right?

Uh slave labor, I should say, because everyone had slavery, but slave labor as a foundation of society, is created by the Greeks basically, right?

Uh so

This is one of the central tendencies of the development of civilization.

Now, how does that apply today?

Well, uh, water believe it or not, water is still the foundation.

All right, sorry, before I get to today, uh, European modernity was a similar, created a similar kind of dark ages.

Uh, the creation of the steam engine.

And modern capitalism as we know it.

Uh well if you think about it, Marx's class struggle that he de describes.

This is kind of bleeding into the lux the lecture I wanted to give on Prussia.

Prussia, Prussia, like Professor Jeng says, right?

But more or less, if you think about it, Marx's notion of class struggle in some way articulated two opposing tendencies in the development of modern Europe, right?

One was this kind of Prussian esque tendency toward further integration and unity.

Uh the the creation of an imperial authority and tendency, aka the proletarian dictatorship.

And the Communist Manifesto, what did they say?

The working men have no nation, right?

This is an integral unifying tendency of civilization, communism, the proletarian side of the proletarian class struggle.

But then on the other hand, you had the kind of opposing tendency, which was the inevitable political fragmentation engendered by the development of uh

Capitalism in its degenerate and d decadent mode, right?

In its degenerate and its decadent mode, capitalism more or less corresponds to um

You know, uh capitalists becoming this kind of oligarchical force, right?

And the public interest or the commons, so to speak, being completely subordinated to the private interests of the capitalist class.

So that's the kind of story of modernity so far.

Maybe that story culminates in the very conflict that we call the Cold War, right?

Uh in any k uh Prussia versus Anglostan was Soviet Union versus the USA in in in some measure.

In some way you can look I'm not a big fan of Prussia, okay.

I I my Prussia lecture will be very critical of Prussia, but

When you think about it, the Soviet Union versus Nazi Germany is like a Prussian civil war.

So it's the Marx Communists versus the pedophile decadent Prussian Junker aristocracy.

Both representing different tendencies that very much did exist within Prussia, by the way.

Then the Soviet Union wins, it takes the capital of Prussia, names it Kaliningrad, and now the Soviet Union is fighting the Anglo-Atlantic mercantile capitalist world after, right?

Also, Stal that's when the a after World War Two, that's when the Rootless Cosmopolitan Campaign happened.

And according to Moishi Postone, the beginning of left-wing so-called anti-Semitism, meaning anti-Zionism, by the way.

In any case, quite anti-Semitic, actually, quite anti-Semitic.

According to Moishi Postone, Stalin invented anti-Zionism.

Anyway, uh

On the left.

Anyway, so you where does that leave us here?

I think that we're going to be entering a new dark ages.

I think that Americans will soon a few.

Okay, can I you want me to dumb it down for retards?

I could do that.

I think that you're going to go to the gas pump, it's going to be $10 a gallon.

And then electricity is not going to be reliable, and electrical grids and energy grids are going to fail.

And therefore, the foundation of modern nation states, centralized nation states, is going to collapse.

So I said this before.

We live in a society of total surveillance and total control, supposedly, right?

But when you think about it,

All that depends upon a stack, which is very much being exposed by the Iran war right now.

So if there's no electricity, and then there's no, if there's no energy, there's no electricity, and there's no internet, the FBI cannot, in fact, spy on you.

Okay, the CIA cannot, in fact, spy on you.

You're pretty much free to do whatever the fuck you want, right?

And that's the breakdown of the control of the state itself, as we know it, the modern state.

So what's going to probably happen in America?

What's going to happen?

Okay, here's what I expect is going to happen.

If it becomes unreliable to turn the fucking lights on, then we're going to start seeing the proliferation of.

Do-it-yourself techniques to generate power and electricity.

I mean, no, there will be selective pressure in the same way there was selective pressure during the lockdowns on the market for just ways to bypass that.

Like, for example, DoorDash was an example of that when you think about it.

There were many others.

There's going to be this is going to be like the next big thing.

There's going to just be do-it-yourself alternatives to the centralized energy grid.

People are going to just, there's going to be a proliferation of abilities, generators, technologies, solar panel technologies, all sorts of ways to just bypass this collapse, but that will simultaneously decentralize political authority.

That will simultaneously decentralize political authority, meaning whoever controls this shit is their own fucking king.

And because what you're also exercising control over

Is the entire stacks upon which total systems of surveillance and control depend upon so everyone there's just going to be a bunch of fucking warlords running around controlling entire neighborhoods that because not every household is going to want to fucking have to do this right so i don't know exactly what scale it's going to be on but there's going to be a decentralization of the stack so to speak decentralization of communications infrastructure and it's not going to be universal anymore the the a universally shared stack is over that's what's coming to an end and that's the new dark ages and i know for a fact i can't say if this will happen in europe

I've never been to Europe in my fucking life besides the airports, and Germany, by the way, treated me very poorly.

So thank you, Germany.

But.

And I was at the Charles de Gaulle airport in France.

The food was terrible.

I thought there was gonna be croissants and tasty shit.

And it was just fucking garbage.

But I've never been to Europe besides these two airports.

And I have to say, I don't know what's going to fucking happen in Europe.

I know my country.

And in my country, if life gets disrupted this severely, people are going to search for do-it-yourself solutions and implement them.

I know for a fact that Americans are just going to start taking shit in their own hands and trying to bypass the crisis themselves.

And I know for ones, if you're American, you agree with me.

That's how Americans are.

100% they're going to fucking start doing that shit.

And there's going to be a selective pressure.

To just it's just gonna spontaneously proliferate.

Americans look, you say what you want about Americans.

They know how to improvise and ad improvise, adapt, overcome, whatever.

Like they're good at that.

Americans know how to just do shit, fix problems, solve things on a technical level when they're when they're forced to, right?

Um

And so these people that work in garages and know how to tinker with shit, they're going to play a big fucking role in the future Civil War that's going to happen that I talk about, right?

Okay, so I need you to.

This is what a guy who I very much dislike, but I keep referencing lately, Louis Al Tusser will call kind of over-determination of all these different variables and factors.

Okay, couple this with the political.

uh polarization I've been talking about for years, which is system systemically and institutionally unsustainable.

Okay?

There's all these factors will converge and lead to the simple result of political fragmentation, warlord era, dark ages, civil war.

Okay.

And that is going to happen.

Maybe it'll be in 20 years or something, but it will happen eventually, right?

Texas has its own power grid, doesn't fucking matter.

Or maybe it does, but look.

All it takes is two things to happen, so that it doesn't matter what Texas has: proliferation of these technologies that reduce dependency on centralized infrastructure, meaning any warlord can emerge somewhere and say, fuck you to the entire state and the government.

I'm going to fucking power my own shit.

I'm no longer dependent on you.

Second thing is the proliferation of lethal, autonomous weapons.

Which is more likely than you would think.

And it was predicted by Death Stranding 2, by the way.

Which is a very prophetic Kojima's fucking s somehow he knows shit before it happens, so there's that.

And so those two all it takes is those two things to just disrupt the foundations of the unity of the United States of America.

And these will happen.

So.

Why, okay, so now we have to think about what is the basis of the unity of the division of labor really?

Because

How then do s do after experiencing dark ages and political fragmentation?

Does a division of labor reintegrate?

Do a people reintegrate?

Do statelits and so on reintegrate?

How is the integration process?

If you are an American Communist Party member and you're part of this cult, that's the question that should be on your mind.

That's the Prussia pill.

So, to speak, that I wanted to talk about.

That's the foundation of Marx and the Communist Manifesto and so on.

This very question.

When you think about it, right?

Emphasis on when you think about it.

Which I know many of you bitch ass people are not thinking, so don't worry.

Um first of all, I want to just leave it on this before we transition into our debates.

Um it's actually not directly.

A shared infrastructure.

There's something that pre-exists shared material infrastructure.

And that is a shared.

Cosmos, a shared law.

Think about Boris Groys, a shared language, but not language in the conventional sense as a mere means of communication, but a shared kind of symbolic order, if you will, right?

A shared communication of kind of pre-conceptual, even pre-lingual authority, shared logo, sure, right?

That binds and glues together communities who almost have nothing else gluing them together except the word.

And where do these communities exist in the real world?

Nomads.

Nomadic peoples don't have the shared infrastructure, they have the shared word, the shared bond.

My word is worth something.

That's all that's what f that's the difference between life and death in the pastoral nomadic societies in history, right?

Because they don't have centralized hydraulic infr they don't have any of that, they have the word and the word becomes the decisive means of production, so to speak, that unifies a people together.

Uh you know

When Islam arose, the world was quite dark.

You had the assassinates.

Um, who were quite degenerate.

They were doing this incest stuff, which was really nasty.

Uh but they were quite degenerate in every sense of the word, I mean economically, politically.

They were ru governed by kind of private interests, so to speak, uh feudal interests.

There was a severe tribal fragmentation that defined the Arabian Peninsula where the tribes were divided between uh different powers.

And

This division

Was felt across the region because the Romans, believe it or not, they created a dark age.

And that's the context Islam arose from.

What they called Jahaliyyah was really dark age.

If you're Muslim, then take my lecture and say what I mean by dark age is Jahaliyah, it's the ignorance.

What is the ignorance?

The ignorance is the

Ignorance of the kind of integral unified totality of labor.

When the division of labor becomes so acute that you lose sight of what unifies us, right, in material reality, this is Jahaliyah, this is the ignorance, the pre-logos, right?

Uh okay.

So

How can we reunify society after technology divides us?

I'm Hideo Kojima and this is my fucking

Life's work, is it not?

Isn't that what fucking Death Stranding is about?

Like technology is dividing us, so how do we reunifi how do we reconnect?

That's the question that matters, especially if you're in the ACP.

You should think about that question.

Because

If you take what I say uncritically, you should say, well, then technology is the problem.

But no, it's irreversible.

The do-it-yourself decent see, the decentralization of energy and electrical infrastructure is progressive.

There's no going back.

And just like for the Greeks, it was progressive.

The Greek innovations in decentralized hydraulic technologies were, after Alexander's conquest, actually applied to the Nile River irrigation systems and improved agriculture.

Yeah, I was I left off at Improved Mi uh Nile Agriculture.

Buy a new mic.

You know what, Lennon Grato, nineteen seventeen, why don't you uh buy me a new mic?

Why don't you drop fucking

Uh, like 20 subs or some shit, bro.

I'll be Haz Shekelstein tonight.

You want to be on some.

You wanna be on some shit like that?

I'll be on some Haas Schekelstein type of shit, okay?

Crab it up then bro.

Jennifer, you better not, by the way.

You better not.

This doesn't apply to you.

See

Bro, I should say that.

Astral Stani, all the typical, all the usual don't apply to y'all.

Y'all are good.

Bro, Australian Sandy, thank you though.

Anyway, um

Get a new PC, bro.

Are you retarded?

CEO?

Guys, you don't actually.

Guys, come on.

What are we doing here?

CEO, what's up?

Bro, I'm so Jewish.

This is crazy.

Autistic, what's up, bro?

Comrade Thomas.

Okay, guys, I'll fucking buy a new one.

Holy shit.

I'll literally buy a new one.

I heard I heard you loud and clear.

Uh, base populace, I got you, bro.

Thank you.

Alright, listen, guys.

Anyway, let me.

It's so Jewish of me.

It's just so Jewish.

I just know it just comes natural like that.

You know, it's just like some natural ass shit.

It's just like some natural ass shit.

It just comes naturally to me like that, you know?

Anyway.

Okay, so.

Because here I was thinking, let me continue.

Because the decentralized hydraulic technologies that the Greeks innovated when Alexander conquered post-Ptolemaic Egypt applied these technologies to improve Nile River hydraulic systems.

Bro, Lennon Grato, you didn't have to do that, bro.

Thank you.

Tipo, what's up, bro?

Thank you for the five.

Appreciate you guys.

Bro, I was joking.

Anyway.

Um

Listen, y'all, you know, you don't have to donate to this shit.

You just gotta show support as a cult.

I just want your mind and your soul.

That's enough.

And even if it ever came, guys, that you know you couldn't afford to sustain the streams, I'll find it I'll find another way.

All right, don't worry.

But thank you guys, I appreciate it.

All right, so anyway.

Um what was I saying?

So uh the

Here I was thinking for a long time.

I thought Alexander the Great was just this savage booty bandit who was running around antiquity.

Lenin Dubois, what's up?

I thought Alexander the Great was just this savage booty bandit running around antiquity, taking men's butts and plundering and looting all the gold and resources and contributing nothing to civilization.

And it was just complete ransacking.

He was funded by usurious Macedonian feudal pederasts, and he was just running around plundering everybody's shit.

Stealing.

And there's truth to that.

But then I then looked at the kind of statistics and I was like, okay, but why did the population grow post-Hellenism?

Why was the population growing?

That's why I DM'd Paul Cockshot and I asked him about Greek technology and its contributions, because it confused me.

And then I learned that the hydraulic technologies that the Greeks implemented in Greece.

We're then applied to actually improve the centralized hydraulic systems in the Orient.

And actually reinforce the state power, right?

Captain, what's up?

So we can't be anti-technology.

That's what I'm trying to tell you.

We can't be anti-technology.

We can't say, well, technology is going to divide us, so we have to be opposed to technology.

No, what we have to do is discover more fundamentally what unites us.

Insofar as we say the only thing that unites us is national electrical and energy grids, that's true.

But why is that?

Well, because they reinforce our habits.

Well, what are our habits ultimately rooted in?

So this is going to give us an opportunity to rediscover civilization, to rediscover really what unites us as civilization, as a people, as a nation, whatever you want to call it.

And this is, in my opinion, this is the position, this is the mission of the American Communist Party on this continent.

That's okay, what's the American Communist Party for?

Well, I think civilization is going to fragment and collapse in North America, and the American Communist Party is here to reunify it after it does.

Look!

QFK said he'll be the running hamster to run my stream lights.

All right.

Where did he say that?

Where did he say that shit?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

You know what's funny is I could deadass imagine that shit.

I could deadass imagine that shit.

I could actually I could visualize and picture that.

I could visualize and picture that shit.

He's just he's just running the whole time.

Okay, we're gonna start our um Tic Tac.

We're going to start our tic tac.

Are y'all ready for the Tic-Tac?

Ones If Y're Ready for TikTok.

Alright y'all, we're gonna be getting into the debate segment.

Oh, you know what?

Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.

Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Who's that person that was in VC talking about how the drug trade is anti-imperialist?

Get them in VC right now.

Unban them right now.

What was their name?

Did they agree they were going to debate?

Because we'll just debate them right now in VC before.

Who is that person?

Lentil.

Okay, where is Lentil?

Unban Lentil and bring them into VC.

They said they won't debate.

Ah, yeah, yeah, of course.

Of course.

Just like, just hijack the Discord and hijack everybody's fucking attention and shit.

And don't actually give the stream any fucking content.

Thank you so much.

She went to bed.

Okay, yeah.

Yo, can you hear me now?

Y'all, can you hear me now?

What up, y'all, can you hear me now?

What up y'all, are you able to hear me now?

What up y'all, are you able to hear me now?

Yeah?

Right.

Good.

Alright, uh okay, so

I want to tell you guys something.

Debate in Discord unban.

Okay, somebody unban them.

Mods, unban them.

Unban them.

Unban them.

What are we talking about?

Unban them.

Go and ban them!

On Bannham.

Any mods, any mods, any mods, any mods, any mods, any mods, any mods?

Any mods?

Any Maz Any Maz

Any Mars can unban them.

Uh, Amirio, what's up, bro?

Are you here?

Volk.

Okay, yeah, Volk is here.

Volk, their name is Lentils, like the beans.

Alright, while y'all do that, while y'all get to that.

Paperwind, what's up, bro?

Yeah, all y'all can do that.

So, while y'all do that, I want to sit talk about something, which is that I thought I was autistic for a long time.

I feel like I'm Autistic.

I feel like there's just things.

on an everyday level that I understand, that makes sense to me, but then people they just think I'm strange and they don't understand it until I explain it to them, and then they understand it and they have existential dread.

So I thought for a long time

That I was autistic.

And sometimes I s I still think I'm autistic, right?

But then I realized something.

But then I realized something.

I'm not autistic.

Hit Kalady, what's up bro?

I realized something.

Um

I'm not autistic.

I'm just ooze back.

You understand?

I realize that.

I'm just Uzbek.

I don't.

We don't deal with any trifling nonsense.

We don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

I'm Uzbek.

I'm Uzbek, we don't have to deal with trifling nonsense, I'm Uzbek.

Meaning the the nomadic pa the pastoral nomadic migration patterns, they don't change.

The sun rises in the morning and sets at dawn at dusk.

So, like, I'm Uzbek.

I don't have to care about any trifling, nothing.

So, people think I'm Autistic.

I'm actually Uzbek.

And uh

People say socially, I'm autistic.

I'm Uzbek.

We don't deal with any trifling nonsense.

I promise.

I promise.

We don't have to deal with trifling.

People say on a social level, Oz is strange.

No, I'm Uzbek.

We don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

You know what I mean?

Do you understand what I'm talking about on this?

I'm Uzbek, you know what I mean?

The type where I don't have to deal with trifling nonsense.

Um so here we are on uh TikTok.

Guys, the TikTok is ask literally ask me anything.

Don't ask me stupid questions like what do I think about Mexican food.

Ask me anything.

Communism will never work.

Already has.

It already has.

So, what are you talking about?

Where is lentil?

Where is lentil?

Okay, we have to unban Lentil.

We also have to expedite their give roll up Lentil with the member role so they could just we could just expedite this shit.

Where is communism working today?

China and the whole world.

Because communism is the riddle of history solved.

The whole all of world history is bending into communism.

Communism is winning everywhere, according to science and the laws of history.

If you disagree with that, it's probably 'cause you're mentally defective, frankly.

Uh lentil is sleeping.

What the f y'all y'all talk what are y'all talking about?

It's like 3 a.m.

Some Australian nonsense.

Some Austral Australia Australian nonsense.

You think a Communist and Muslims can come together?

Seamus Mog who who is Seamus?

Bring up Seamus.

Bring them up.

Ask, guys, ask me anything.

Honest to God.

Literally, just ask me anything.

Straight up, ask me anything.

Ask me anything about my worldview, about what I believe, about and if no, no, no, ask me anything like education-wise, like if there's something you don't know that you want to know, ask me.

Like, ask me.

I'll be the teacher.

Ask me anything.

Has your position developed?

Yeah, my my the optics have developed, meaning I I know how to say it in a way that's not gonna trigger um people who are neur neuroidivergent and uh

rage and scream when they hear something that I you know, s they're throwing all these other implications on with it that are never being said.

Uh how are Renders supposed to know you're communist?

And that is uh debate because I said so.

So there's somebody named Anime Owner.

There.

Um, I just wanted to ask you a question about your views.

That's okay.

Okay.

Um, I just wanted to know, um, if you had someone who was a conservative, like, how would you try to convince them of uh your perspective?

'Cause I have friends who I try to like educate, um, but it feels like really difficult because they feel like pretty indoctrinated.

Uh, about what?

Um I try to teach them about like the basics of like leftist um like ideology, but it just but I'm not like well read myself, so it feels difficult to um okay, but on what

Real world view is because leftist ideology just kind of sounds like nonsense.

So, on what issue or worldview or thing are you trying to win people over on?

That's the question you should really ask.

Oh, well, I don't have a specific, I was trying to go for like a general perspective because, according to the left, quote-unquote, leftist ideology, they call me far right, so that doesn't mean a whole lot to me.

But you're not far right, correct?

I'm not.

But that's why the whole notion of this nebulous leftist ideology is just pointless.

What is a leftist ideology?

I mean, you're left-wing politically, or you're right-wing, but what is a leftist ideology?

We have to agree with all these things that are just bundled together in a packaged deal because Obama said so.

I'm not buying it.

This just kinda sounds like an o Obam Obamunism.

I'm not an Obamunist.

No, I I'm just not well read myself.

I'm sorry.

I'm just trying to No, you don't have to be well read.

I understand.

Um You don't have to be well read.

So I guess like wh where do you even start?

Um like

Like, how do I get from my perspective or from my point to your point?

I don't know what what your point is, though.

Like, what is your

Um, but I g I don't have a specific I I only have like a general idea.

But why why why are you well, okay, what what what what makes you what makes left wing ideas compelling to you?

Um I like the idea of having a greater unity at least in a social like democratic

You guys saw my hands did not move.

I didn't do anything.

It's just quite literally not my fault.

Um

Bro, this one guy keeps trying to join, bro.

True philosophy, bro.

It's like every time.

Can you get somebody else to join, bro?

Hello?

What's up, bro?

But come on, you've been on way too long, bro.

Okay, yeah.

So, I wanted to ask this specific thing, and then maybe go into some other things I've been thinking about, but I do have a much more concrete thing to talk about than last time.

So, here it is.

With the forces that be and the ruling class having a vested interest in antagonizing and exploiting particular groups, do you think that perhaps obligates a Communist Party to go out of their way to this guy?

I'm sorry.

HG, go ahead.

Communism kills a hundred gorzillians.

Your name is one.

Your name is HGH.

Can you comment on what your name means?

Bro, what the fuck is going on?

I'm bringing the other guy back.

He literally left.

He said communism killed a hundred trillion people.

Got it, bro.

All right.

Sorry.

Listen, which groups are the state targeting?

Go ahead.

Black people right now, Latin people, a lot more.

I guess brown people in general.

Let's see.

Queer people, except that's more of a narrative thing.

How does the state target queer people?

This is a question I've never had answered.

Queer people?

Yeah.

Just continuing to push for policy which limits their ability to have the same expressive permissions as straight people.

The gay mares political theater conversation.

The the um

Well okay it's just political theater though.

What does it mean?

Engage with key marriage, 'cause I d what else is there?

Hold on.

I guess there's constant rhetoric.

I think it's constant rhetoric against them.

I think they're pretty much a good idea.

Okay, there's mean rhetoric and mean things being said.

Look, I don't agree that oppression takes the form of all these different identities that on an intersection their struggles, quote unquote, intersect.

Curiously, every single one of these identities, the question of whether they're legitimate or not is just whether they're accepted institutionally.

Why aren't furries a legitimate field of struggle in your mind?

What about furries?

That's just like a that's just a hobby, you know.

Okay, well, no, for many of them, there's a deep like it's very deeply, I have this animal spirit, I'm uh I'm uh have the spirit of a of a of a giraffe or something, and then it's very you see, I'm just saying, like, what makes it a political meaningfully political struggle for a Marxist?

Who decides that except Obama?

See, the DNC gets to decide what is a quote-unquote struggle, and then Marxists come and say, this is the people's democratic struggle.

No, this is a completely meaningless lifestyle and private habit people have that has nothing to do with politics in any meaningful way.

See, that may go for like queer people, but I think that for the racial conflicts, of course, those are a lot go a lot deeper and they are very much.

I agree, but that's part of what Marxists will call the national question.

So the United States has a disfigured national democratic history.

And you can put that in a Marxist framework and make total sense of it.

You know, the black population's struggle is tied to the land struggle, you know, always has been.

It's tied to the struggle for democratic equality and citizenship.

It's tied to the struggle for a unified and integral national existence.

Because American national existence doesn't exist, by the way.

Someone tried to say, I'm a dugan, I'm a Nazi for talking about national existence.

The problem is, America is not a nation yet, okay?

Because you had people that came from Europe, you had people that came from wherever.

And the premise is that, according to Stalin, that unified people into a nation is not finished in America.

So black people and that whole thing is part of that process of the national becoming of America and the creation of a society of.

You know, the democratic struggle for equal rights and so on through the civil rights struggle.

And then now that has been transposed to a fundamental economic question, right?

Which is political rights exist, universal political equality exists, and yet there is an uneven level of development with respect to black communities versus white communities, which reintroduces but but but that antagonism touches upon the universal predicament of the American nation, which is the fact that our system and our state doesn't serve the common interest of the people and their well-being.

And that touches upon that for sure.

Now, the Democrats and others have tried to exploit this fact by pitting the white worker against the black worker and saying you have to bow your head and pay your privilege, and that this is about our internal feelings of racism.

This is about our psychologies.

This is about our perceptions and our feelings.

Because they turned what should be a material struggle into a psychological struggle, that's when all of these other things from intersectionality started being bundled into the package.

And that's what I object to fundamentally as a Marxist.

You also think it's funny you bring up this material versus psychological dichotomy.

I don't know about dichotomy is the right word, but because that brings me to another concept about how I believe that liberals and conservatives dialectically produce like Trump and Trumpism.

I believe that it started with conservative figures having jokes that have some kind of real bigotry in them, but they pose as fake bigotry.

Liberals proceed to call that out, and then there was an era of grandstanding on context.

And if there's a you don't get it, it's deeper.

And instead of deepening the analysis to get past that, because of course they're the loser fascists, they don't really want to win these debates, they instead further out their analysis.

They made it worse.

So they started just blatantly ignoring any kind of context and having this new form of anti-bigotry where it's just a it's just I don't care what it really was.

It's tone policing and it's intensely psychological.

It has nothing to do with what Marxism regards as politics at all.

Yeah.

It's about manufacturing psychologies, behaviors, temperaments, tones, and ultimately a certain world of affects and perceptions.

I don't know.

And this is very sensitive and insecure.

And somehow that's conflated with politics.

Right.

Well, I think in particular, Latin Americans, there's a unique situation there.

Maybe not that unique, but I think, you know, there's obviously the idea that we want to bring them in so that we can get cheaper.

Wait, brother, how old are you?

18.

Are you in a high school cafeteria?

Sorry, now this is a lounge to a dorm building.

I can go to a quieter portion of it.

All right, no, I'm just, I'm just, somebody was saying that.

I was just saying that would be crazy.

Like, what the hell?

No, so, um, you know, there's that, of course, that, that, um, fact.

And I think that, like, with Trump's current austerity, it's, it's a, it's a matter of trying to get them back in line, trying to get them not to advocate for themselves and instead to be in fear.

And so, do you think that would possibly obligate a Communist Party to give them back the chance to advocate as a worker?

Well, look, no, no, communists should not play into this game that this intensely psychological game that liberals and quote-unquote conservatives play with each other.

We should fundamentally ignore that and rip the material infrastructure from under them by asking for the meat and potatoes.

Okay, Matt Walsh can sit here and talk about transgender is all he wants.

We should simply ignore it and say, what about Epstein?

What about Netanyahu?

What about Iran?

What about things that actually matter?

Key sensitive points and sensitive issues, especially the Israel question, which will turn the Republican right into the very same neurotic, politically correct liberal that they grift off of, humiliating.

So there's a grain of truth in how the right-wing griffs by exploiting people's antagonism toward the bourgeois liberal.

Okay.

There's a grain of truth there.

People hate the inauthenticity.

But as communists, we can apply that same tactic against the right wing and expose the kernel of truth.

Okay, let's be plain spoken and common sense about reality.

You see, Zionism is at the foundation of the liberal identity politics and the right-wing Matt Walsh grift.

I'll tell you why.

The whole creation of this sensitive PC safe space originally started with Zionists who believed that anti-Semitism was the number one crisis in America and tried to completely gatekeep and control tones and behaviors and language just because they thought that the alternative was going to be the next mustache guy, right?

Right.

So this neurotic, completely hysterical, artificial manufactured world of delusion and deception, of gatekeeping truth itself just by pointing fingers.

You call someone anti-Semitic, it's over.

Conversation ended.

That's the Zionists are the ones that introduce this into U.S.

politics.

Then liberals take that and they add a bunch of other things.

So black people very legitimately said, okay, but wait, we've been through a lot.

So they added black people to that.

Then they added other people.

Then they added homophobia and all these other things.

And the foundation is the Zionism, right?

Well, the foundational victim is some of these things.

The foundational victim is Jewish.

So.

That's the sensitive little bubble that the liberals created.

Then the Republican right.

Just griffs by saying they just selectively popping bubbles, right?

And seeing their hysterical reaction, and that's a way to channel people's resentment against the bourgeois liberal.

And while the right wing is sneaking in all these other agendas, so we should just pop the whole bubble because actually the Republicans are also in a bubble.

So maybe I'll bring you back in a second, but somebody else is in my VC.

Oh, it's finally, it's finally Lentil, the famous Lentil.

Wow, Lentil, go ahead.

What's up?

Um

Hello.

Hello!

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

So what is this nonsense I'm hearing about that the drug trade is anti-imperialist?

I said the marco economics are a way for the resistance to fund itself.

Which resistance?

For example, Assad Syria was the first time.

No, this was the beginning of the end for Assad.

This was the beginning.

By the way, you know who was against this was Qasim Soleimani.

And when he was gone, this nonsense started kicking in, and it laid the foundation for the popular grievance and resentment against the Syrian state because it refused to reform along any lines that would actually produce and generate viable sources of wealth for the people.

What did an Iranian general have to do with Syria's because Qasim Soleimani was leading at the vanguard of the defense of the Assad government against al-Qaeda, and he very much had an advisory role with respect to, okay, well, how do we actually prevent, how do we address the social conditions that give rise to the enemy's ranks swelling up, right?

So he was really adamantly trying to fight corruption.

Uh within the Assad government.

Um okay, sure, but uh there was still a significant period of time where Assad's government did use the drug trade to fund its resistance.

And also this is just one example.

Well to fund the state, to fund the state.

Not even, not even, to fund corrupt officials who personally were benefiting from it.

That was their source of revenue.

That's how they were getting rich.

That was what ensued the loyalty of the military bureaucracy within Syria.

There is this chain of command of these different generals and whatever who were making money off of this, basically.

And it was that's why the morale did not exist within Syria to defend the state when Jolani came.

Because it wasn't based on a morale of true national sovereignty and patriotism and so on and so on.

It at that point had entered a stage of corruption.

But they produced something like, what, eighty, ninety percent of the world's Capiton supply?

So you're saying all of this money went to corrupt officials and none of it was used to uh you know, the state?

Meaningfully, it wasn't used maybe there was some maintenance there here or there, but it it didn't it didn't really meaningfully address

The material needs of the Syrian people.

I question this point, but since there is like limited evidence to either side, I will bring up another case.

Taliban in Afghanistan used the poppy uh market for a long time to fund their resistance against the American uh empire.

Uh I don't think that was a significant source of revenue for them.

I'd have to question that.

But something like 98% of the world's pop opium comes from Afghanistan.

And the Taliban did manage to survive for what, decades?

No, I know, but there's the fact that Taliban was...

Yeah, but the Taliban was not wealthy.

They didn't have advanced military equipment or infrastructure or technology.

They had what they already had.

They just had mountains.

So they needed food.

They needed clothes and not much else, honestly.

Yeah, and they used the marketplace.

I think the opium production was primarily the revenues were primarily going to the US-backed warlords, not the Taliban.

I mean, I'm sure that it also went to the U.S., but it's very difficult for the Taliban to get funds from any other way.

The Taliban's a local insurgency.

So a local insurgency can get fed and clothed and materially supported by the villages that it's operating within.

And that's fine.

That's a standard guerrilla war tactic.

If you're combining hybrid conventional methods of war with your asymmetrical warfare, then yes, you're going to need some revenue, so to speak.

For example, the yellow guys in Lebanon do have to combine conventional and unconventional tactics of war.

So they actually do need revenue, right?

They're not just living off of the villages.

But uh I just fail to see what your point is.

Like what you're trying I I I'm by the way, let me just like skip the difficulties.

I'm sure that you could find an example somewhere in history of guerrilla partisans who are anti-imperialist obtaining some measure of some source of revenue from the drug trade.

The reason I don't think it's very common is because

Guerrilla warriors will fall into two categories.

One is a kind of purely indigenous kind of struggle where it's a pure asymmetrical form of war and they're purely living off of the land that they're standing upon.

Now, this is an extremely effective form of guerrilla war in many senses because it kind of constantly replenishes the underlying source of morale for the guerrilla army and creates a dichotomy that situates the indigenous population versus the imperialists, and there's not much mediation necessary.

When the guerrilla war becomes truly protracted and they have to start combining conventional methods of war, which means they have to buy equipment and they have to get revenues that are external and kind of exogenous from the homeland, this will place them within a greater world system than just their homeland.

So, this introduces an element materially into the anti-imperialist struggle that is no longer indigenous or no longer rooted in the soil or the homeland.

Now, this could, for example, be in the case of the yellow guys in Lebanon.

The exogenous source is Iran.

Everyone knows that.

For many guerrilla struggles around the world, there was an exogenous source in the Soviet Union.

Uh and so on and so on.

When your guerrilla war has to last so long that you have to tap into the global drug trade, it has a corrupting effect.

Now you're depending upon a system that is very well integrated within the global economy and primarily controlled by the CIA, by the way.

And yeah, when you get to the point where you have to rely on revenues from things like the drug trade to support your protracted guerrilla war struggle, you get to a point where it has a corrupting effect because you're integrating yourself into a well-established world system, very much controlled by the CIA, by the way, which creates materially a foundation of resistance that is external and alien from the native population.

And this creates a disconnection between the partisans and the people on whose behalf they fight.

Yeah, I wasn't commenting on how efficient or moral it is to use the our culture.

I'm sorry, resistance.

I'm not talking about moral in the abstract.

Let's focus on effectivity, right?

I wasn't even talking about the effectivity.

I was just purely talking that it is a reaction to the empire, but it doesn't diminish the fact that it is resistant still.

But it's it's it's um it could maybe be resistance, but what it mainly is is a resistance that has been conquered by the world system.

At this point, you know, it's no longer viably

Able to supplant or replace the imperial hegemony because it no longer has the popular base.

If you have a popular base, you don't need to do these things.

You have a popular base, you don't need a drug trade.

Now, if the source of your support among the people is that you have revenues that come from the drug trade, then you don't have truly organic revolutionary support from the people because this revolutionary support comes from the word.

Okay, the prophets in the Bible or Muhammad and so on, they didn't need to bribe people with money to get their support.

They had the word.

Che Guevara didn't need to give people money.

He had the word.

Lenin, he had the word, right?

You have the word, you don't need.

Drugs, you don't need money, you don't need to bribe people, you just need to tell the truth and organize people and bring justice and so on and so on.

Yeah, I mean I never argued that.

My point was more that this is this is like an inevitable side effect.

Like when you're in the...

It's inevitable when you failed, when you fail to adapt, when you fail to refine, when you've basically lost and you become this kind of zombie that just is maybe sustaining your existence but going nowhere.

And what about Taliban?

I mean, did it?

I mean, I just thought that they're like one of the terms used to describe Taliban was uh narcoterists is they did that was such a significant part of their activity.

I think that was just propaganda.

I think that was just propaganda, if I'm being completely honest.

But anyway, Lentil I want to ask you, what do you think about the Mexican cartels?

I think they are

They are an inevitable product of the hegemony that US established in the South by the CIA.

Something might have been.

So, what's what was the big hubbub about in the in the Discord?

What was the big hubbub?

Uh well people I think widely misunderstood my stance.

When I said she's capping and she was way more extreme and she's just being reasonable now because she's summoned in front of

Everyone.

Once if ones if she's capping and she was saying some crazy ass shit, but now is being more reasonable.

Who knows?

Somebody tell me what the big hubbub.

I don't believe there was big hubbub.

I don't think my people are that unreasonable.

There was some big ass hubbub going on as you were saying some crazy ass shit.

What the hell were you saying?

People were claiming that I was saying that all drug cartels are anti-imperialist, which I multiple times.

Yeah, what did I say?

Still let me know.

It's so funny that the TikTokers think I'm talking to them.

TikTokers are doing ones, bro.

Y'all don't even know what's going on.

I'll come back to y'all, don't worry.

She said Mexican drug cartels challenge US imperialism, they hurt.

Uh the US and South America not benefit from them.

Yeah, I feel I think that's just totally wrong.

I think my argument was that.

Because of US.

Are you Mexican or do you live in Europe?

You said it's 3 a.m.

where you live?

Yeah, I live in Europe.

What uh what dog do you have in this race?

I it was literally just a random debate, but your people kept dragging it for like a day.

But what dog what what country are you from?

Um uh

Originally Iranian.

Okay, but what dog do you have in this race?

Nothing, yeah.

People just kept dragging it and I don't know what that is.

Why do you have this position?

It's so bizarre.

It's not a crazy position, honestly.

I'm just um it's a very commonly known thing that it's because of US that the drug cartels exist.

And they keep using those as an excuse for even enhanced presence in South America.

Yeah, but the CIA creates the drug trade.

Everyone knows that.

I mean So you just like gangsta is that is that you like gangsters?

You you wanted these Europeans?

You one of these European you want of these European goons that run around with the track shoots and shit, right?

That's the type of shit you're talking about.

No, that's not not exactly.

That's what it is.

You're just one of these knife wielding European goons running around with the track suits, uh, you know, slinging heroin everywhere and shit, right?

I'm just saying that macroeconomics we're going to do.

What dog do you have in this race, ultimately?

What's the dog in the race?

Nothing, I'm just uh interested in how different aspects different parts of the world react to imperialism.

For example, in many parts of the world they react to a drug trade.

I would say that a lot of the drug problems globally are because of US imperialism.

But that's not particularly speaking everywhere.

I was saying the cartels were anti-imperialists.

I just want to know what dog you have in the race to be saying that.

I said cartels could be anti-imperialist and I even quoted a source that said Kavara and no, I couldn't say uh which ones in particular, the submani uh specialization.

But I did read a source that said Guevara and No, that's just propaganda.

Why are you taking propaganda and and what if they say I did that?

Would you believe it?

Of course they didn't know it was propaganda.

Yeah, but you wouldn't know.

So even if they said pesto mine was doing it, would you believe it?

I mean, I know about Afghanistan and I know about Syria and I know in those cases it was used like recently first used like it makes sense.

If you have no other options, if all of your other economies have been completely cooked by the empire, like why not why not resort to drug trade?

Because here's why.

Because the people are still a factor, right?

What about the people?

How do the people live?

How do they support themselves?

Ultimately, you have a foundation of people that have to grow food and they have to eat and they have to have a society.

And if your entire society depends upon drugs, you do not even have the material premises that justify your nation in the first place.

Let's be honest.

Like Dubai, for example.

No, like the UAE.

No, Afghanistan, they can grow food, okay?

The UAE is not even because of the older.

No, no, no, no, no.

Why do you love lizard eaters?

The UAE are in the desert eating lizards.

They don't have anything.

They don't have water.

They don't have...

Anything they don't deserve to exist, but because they're leeching off of global supply chains, because they're hustling oil or something, I don't know, they're allowed to exist.

So, if your nation, if its drugs are that for you, you can't even grow food, you don't even have food.

Um, China was cut off from the world, they built themselves.

Albania under Enver Hoxha was cut off from the world.

Why didn't El Nverhoja have to sell drugs?

That's the nuclear bomb.

You'll never be able to respond to it.

Enver Hoxha, Albania.

They didn't eat it.

They were cut off from the whole world.

I don't know about the Albanian history.

Well, you should look up.

But I'm not sure.

You should look it up.

The opium production in Afghanistan actually caused major shortages in other aspects.

People were going to be able to get under the Taliban in Afghanistan.

They shut it down.

We used to need a lot of water and the poppy farmers were using all of the water and all of the ground resources by the US.

Under the Taliban, they didn't exist.

Damn!

They restricted my shit!

Why did they restrict my shit?

What did I say?

Live visibility reduced.

Damn, this shit is cooked.

Anyway, keep going.

Uh actually it did exist under Taliban only at in the most recent uh when they cooped the power again, then they completely destroyed it.

We can't say the the the the ban, the the T ban?

All right, shit.

What?

If somebody's spamming ACP as LARP, if you don't get in VC and say it with your chest, you're a pussy for the rest of your life.

Anyway, um, lentil.

Okay, is this done?

I'm just saying, I'm Uzbek.

I don't buy the nonsense.

All right.

Say it how you would say it to an Uzbek.

I'm Uzbek.

We don't deal with nonsense.

Do you know about that?

No, I don't.

Yeah, but I'm Uzbek.

I told you, Lebanese.

No, I'm Uzbek.

We don't deal with nonsense.

This none of your what anything you said has to do with migration patterns at all.

Migration patterns.

I didn't talk about migration patterns.

Exactly.

It talks about j nonsense, to be honest.

Okay, sure.

If you permit me I would like to go to sleep now.

Who woke you up?

I didn't know you were.

I mean, I didn't even think you would come.

I was woken up so I could get unbanned, and I wanted to be unbanned.

Offer a Discord server?

I wouldn't wake up for that shit.

Anyway, all right.

Alright, you can go back to sleep.

What kind of crazy fucking cult is this shit that people can't even sleep until they get a All right, anyway, y'all.

All right, two people request to join.

Cam, go ahead.

Haze.

Yeah, what's up?

It's KB.

Please let me back into server.

Bro, you keep blowing up and melting down and saying crazy shit all the time.

It's happened too many times, bro.

You have to promise to never again do anything say anything to O S.

There's somebody in my chat that has a Karl Marx profile picture.

They have a hammer and sickle.

Hey, they're really, really, you know, we're really confused.

Hey, buddy, we get it.

You're trying to virtue signal that you're a communist.

The problem is you're 15 and you're a LARPerer.

You're a LARPerer.

Guy literally just found out about Karl Marx yesterday.

He's mega communist.

Buddy, listen, you're on the Reddit level of you just found out about socialism two days ago.

The people that created mega communism like me, we are elder wizards.

We're sorcerers.

We're literally on a higher level of scholarship and expertise.

And we are advanced dragons.

You are a little lizard and we're advanced dragons.

Don't even talk to me.

Finish high school and then I'll teach you about mega communism.

Finish high school.

Go to bed.

You have to wake up tomorrow for class, do you not?

Go to bed.

Before you put MAGA communism in quotes, as if you're mocking literal dragons and you're a little wizard of Marxism.

We are dragons of Marxism.

You're a little pissant lizard who found out about socialism two days ago.

And I'm a sorcerer, bro.

What are you talking about?

MAGA communism is an extremely refined, articulate, advanced.

Meme engineered.

It was, you have no idea the le level of Marxism we are on to create something like that.

We are on such a level of Mali, Marxism, Leninism, and the science, immortal science.

We are on such a level, you can't even fathom it in your head because you're pathetic.

Now go to bed, boy.

'Cause you have to wake up for your school bus.

Don't forget to pack lunch.

When you finish high school, you can learn about MAGA communism.

But you just found out about socialism two days ago.

Same people who for yeah, we get it.

You went on your school library on the computer and you looked at uh Wikipedia where they lied about us forging signatures and you think that's a talking point.

We get it, dude.

You went to the school library and you went on Wikipedia and you think you know about ACP.

Go to bed.

You're not old enough.

The average debt, yeah, that we get it.

You're a Democrat, we understand.

Tanky Maxer, go ahead.

You better be the right kind of tanky.

What are we supposed to do when Communists capitulate to liberal narratives about Pol Pot and you know the DPRK, for example?

I don't think you could say that name on TikTok, bro.

I don't think you could say that name.

Oh, my apologies.

But, you know, the glasses come off for this one.

That's all I'll say.

The glasses come off for this one.

This guy's on a power level.

Bro, it's his Korean Bolshevik.

Bro, chill.

I don't need that constantly.

You're a Democrat.

You're a Democrat.

You're a Democrat.

You're a liberal.

You're a Democrat.

You're a nerd.

You found out about socialism two days ago because you're a Democrat.

Go vote for Kamala Harris.

Socialism is when Obama plus love.

Plus, you're a Mickey Mouse Democrat on crack, and you think that's socialism.

It's not.

Social communism is brutal and it's dark and it's hardcore.

You're not cut out for it.

Go back to the Young Democrats Club.

This is some dark ass shit.

This is some dark ass shit.

We're guided by the red star.

This is some dark ass shit.

Go back to your Mickey Mouse Democrat Club.

Like, you're not gonna make it, bro.

You're not gonna make it, little bro.

You're not cut out for this.

I'm sorry.

I took a pill and it bees uh

To tell, say Lothaw was uh we darkened yeah, we on some dark villainous shit.

Honestly, because you guys are Mickey Mouse socialists, we have nothing to do with you, we're on some brutal, dark ass shit.

Like, go to Russia right now.

Look at the Soviet legacy.

Look at Soviet culture.

That shit.

That shit was bass.

That shit was.

That was, yes, there was a high note, but there was also a low note, and it combined both, and it was harmonious.

It was rugged.

It had nothing to do with your Mickey Mouse fantasy of, you know, Barney the Dinosaur socialism.

Go back to watching Teletubby.

Stop confusing that for our tradition.

Soviet Union was some heavy metal ass shit, alright?

Go to the Moscow, you go to the Moscow subway and you look at the statues, and it's just you don't see anything of you know this Mickey Mouse, what is this ugly art style that they corporate Memphis art?

Nothing like that.

Evokes nothing like that.

Sit down.

HGH, this crazy crackhead is back.

HGH, what does your name mean, HGH?

So once you try to tell the truth, are you on HCH?

Absolutely.

The best.

Only the best.

Okay, well, if that's the premise, continue.

I guess.

I mean, we don't know.

We were dealing with a crazy guy here.

Go ahead.

Well, the reason why this is my name is when you try to tell people about the amazing man in Russia with the mustache and, you know, the amazing Chinese man in China.

You can name Stalin and Mao on TikTok.

Yeah, Stalin and Mao.

Yeah, TikTok doesn't like that.

And, you know, go ahead.

Well, yeah, I just want to ask a question.

How can we get these people to understand the truth about Stalin and Mao?

Because they think they're just awful people when they were just lied to from Wikipedia.

Yeah, Stalin and Mao were great, correct?

Yeah, absolutely.

So, what do we disagree with?

This 15-year-old keeps going.

We don't nobody wants conservative socially.

Bro, go to the D do you think DPRK was conservative or liberal culturally, if you had to choose?

Like, stop the delusion, bro.

Stop the I'm literally going to the DPRK soon.

I'll ask them any question you have.

Do you what do you think about furries and and all this stuff?

HGH, bro, you're on our side then, right?

So, what's the debate?

Oh, I didn't.

Well, I saw you had a debate: stop doing that HGH.

It's wicked-ass shit.

It's gonna lead to it.

It's the best.

It's gonna lead to Dyne Comes to you later in your life.

Don't do that.

You know what?

It'll be worth it.

I gotta go out badass, you know?

Okay, goodbye forever.

Don't be don't do that.

No, I am gonna t I tell everyone what's going on.

I say, look, on the internet, uh I I think I it's mainly Europe honestly, it's always European leftists that are on some.

They're trifling.

Americans are chill.

It's just always these weird people from Scandinavia.

AC, what party are you in?

Tell me what party you're in.

Tell me what party you're in.

What party are you in?

What what's your party, what political party are you in?

Are you in the the um

The High School Debate Club, is that your party?

Okay, so it's the broke ch J the Korean bulls like literally chill.

He's in the high school debate club versus the ACP.

Well, that's a tough lineup.

Parties are ineffective.

What is this Diddy blood talking about, bro?

What is this Diddy Epstein blood talking about?

Parties are.

What is this?

Diddy bl?

What is this Diddy Epstein blood talking about?

What is this Diddy Epstein blood talking about?

Bro, what are you talking about?

Parties are ineffective.

That's some literal Diddy Epstein type shit.

I don't know what to tell you.

Literal Diddy Epstein.

What is this Diddy Epstein blood talking about?

Parties are ineffective.

Bro, you just discredited yourself in front of the world.

Sit down.

You're done.

It's over.

Give me ideas on how to reach rural people, especially in the American South.

Be honest.

with yourself and that's the first step.

to being honest with everyone and don't be augustic.

An imp impis impis imposative.

Just

Tell the truth, you know?

Like, what are the problems facing people, rural people in the South?

Understand those problems.

And articulate them in such a way that convinces people we can do something about it.

Mm.

Leftcom's debate, where they at?

Where they at?

Where they at?

It never debate.

Of course they don't.

People genuinely cannot think parties will get us to socialism.

You know what's gonna get us to socialism?

Brandon Torres.

Hello.

Recently, you may on july twenty fourth, twenty twenty four, the American Communist Party, led by Jackson Haycock, launched and

Sorry, what?

On july twenty fourth, twenty twenty four, something talk for on a social media.

You should open up a chat panel.

How do I do that?

I do I know people can.

People can uh speak.

People can speak.

People can absolutely speak.

Yeah.

Sleazy talking nonsense.

Some guy named the Goon Master, Hawes, why Communist?

His name is the Goon Master he's asking me this question.

Why are you here?

Hit the request.

How do I make it easy for people to request?

Honestly, this is like: how do I make it easy?

How do I do this?

How do I do anything on this shit?

Honestly.

Triarch

Yo, what's up, Paz?

Yo, what up?

Nice to meet you, bro.

I had a question for you.

What is it you think about the coming of ideologies today that are considered to be past the political paradigms of the first, second, and third dimension of the political spectrum?

In America, there are none.

It's just a speculative proposal by Mr.

Dugan, which don't you think it could be past Duginian philosophy?

Because I I think the recognition might be more than uh Eurasianism, no?

Mm, I'm I am not a dug I'm I'm as much of a duganist as Marx was a Schellingist.

Ah, makes sense, makes sense.

I I was just I was just curious because um although I'm not a Duganist, I do believe in um his framework.

No, I uh well, look, um I I I have written about it in uh my substack called The Brahmins of Democracy, where I propose what he means is uh Mao Sitong thought.

I see, I see, I see.

That the fourth political theory is just Marxism-Leninism.

Well, no, I'm not sure.

Once if you can still hear this, ones of you can still hear this.

On on the yellow, on the green place, on the green place.

Because my shit just said zero.

Okay, you're good?

You're good, you're good, you're good.

All right, yeah, we're good, we're good, we're good, we're good, we're good, we're good, we're good, we're good.

All good.

Yeah, I was I'm I suppose I'm just uh curious because um in Dugan's in Dugan's ideological beliefs, he believes that uh we can transcend past the paradigms of uh capital capitalism, communism, and fascism.

Liberalism liberalism, he his paradigm is liberalism, communism, fascism.

My critique is that he conflates the communism with uh social democracy.

And I just and in that paradigm, there's a straight line from liberalism, social democracy to fascism, which is true.

But I think that Marxism, Leninism is the more advanced thing, which is different.

Bolshevism, it's completely different than social democracy.

And in this sense, yes.

So that's my basic response.

All right.

Someone h his name is Ni Nick Fuentez Rule Stream for the Unemployed.

A Nick Fuentez fan is saying this.

Alright, I think we're gonna wrap this up guys.

I could I could do this all night, but I have to sleep.

I hope you guys found it enlightening.

Somebody named Um just joined.

I don't know who you are, but I don't like your name.

Get out of here.

You're not welcome here.

Anyway, guys, we're ending it right now.

Hope you had fun.

One more TikTok debate.

Okay, one more person can request who's debating, and I'll do it.

There's nobody's requesting, and I it's quite late, actually.

Bro, Korean Bullshit, I've given you literally hundreds of chances.

You constantly, constantly go over the TOS line.

Just stop.

Just let me think for a second, all right?

You need to like truly do something to prove you'll never break TOS again.

Goose.

How's it going?

Awful.

I just had a question because I'm interested in ACP and I see a lot of your members and I talk to some of your members.

Do you live in America?

Yes, yes.

I'm from Buffalo.

All right.

I I I wonder how you coincide religion with dialectical materialism.

Um

Yeah, the the dichotomy is not religion versus dialectical materialism.

The dichotomy is dialectical materialism versus Greek pederastry.

And religion can either rest upon the foundation of Greek pederastry or dialectical materialism.

Mm.

That's a good response, 'cause a lot of the Marxists I talk to will debate that and just say that religion doesn't cannot coincide with dialectical materials.

They don't know what they're talking about.

They're LARPers, they don't know anything.

Yeah, that's why I appreciate the ACP.

You know, 'cause it definitely you know, you say the MAGA communism, but it does fit the American culture and I appreciate how you guys uh stay true to Lenin Marxism, you know.

Marxism, Leninism.

All right, man, see ya.

Bye-bye.

Alright, uh TikTokers, um, bye.

Bye on TikTokers.

Uh I'll still be on a green place, but

Ending this tic tac

TikTackers are so funny, they think that they actually matter.

They don't matter.

They're like, oh, this is for us.

This is just us.

This is.

They have no idea.

They have no idea that they're just being.

That they're just fish in the sea and that we're casting a wide net.

On a boat.

TikTokers have no idea.

Your name is Nick Fuentes Rules.

Let me guess, you're fat.

And you are

A brown white nationalist.

I just see a fatass.

I don't even see any I just don't have no r need to respond to a fat person.

What the hell kick went wrong?

Had had trouble loading.

Huh?

We are experiencing some errors at the moment.

I can't even open my.

Okay, I mean I hope I didn't get banned or something.

Are we good guys?

We're good.

I can't access the website of kick.com.

That is quite fascinating.

Oh, I can't log in.

Huh?

Honeypot not found

Uh am I cooked?

Yeah, I'm logged out of kick.

Yeah, I don't know what's going on guys, we'll see.

Bye-bye.

I'll see you guys.

See you guys Sunday.

Bye-bye.

I hope you had a fun.