🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

I'm not a took you say, oh my touches, the new, I'm not gonna, try, tomorrow, I'm gonna, ready to tell you, ready to tell you, oh, the treaty's gonna, oh, the treaty's gonna, oh, the treaty's gonna, tomorrow, I'm gonna berying to try not enough.

Every day I could tell you a lot, I'm just giving you a heart,

it's only because, I no, hands up for us.

If I think that the lyrics

to your pockets of bars.

I keep passing my son, you know,

I keep closing my eyes, but I keep on the ground

when I thought that place, where it's just in me

but nobody else, so we can't be. I'm the-the-way-lore-the-fled-I tomorrow. I'm not the-bottom.

I'm not today. Oh, my. When I make stuff, it's gonna refresh, they save my breath, don't want to be so much.

Like I'm flying away, when the same ruined.

Come down my place, wash should blow the shame.

When you're done and scared.

Don't worry me.

Because I've been in the heart.

What's your singing for me?

I can try the thing.

I can play it again.

But it's not even nice.

So I'm not trying to be my name. Oh, yeah. I'm gonna be.

I'm gonna go and go and go and go my life.

I'm totally touches.

All the time.

I'm gonna go.

I'm gonna be fine.

I'm gonna be nice.

I'm gonnatrying to be a today. I'm theing it.

It's the game.

I'm the together.

I'm the treaty.

All the today.

Under the day.

Under the day.

I'm the treaty.

All the today, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna be, together, I'm gonna be, what do you see, yes, I'm lost about.

B- Hey, look at me, we'll find myself in this hand, hey, I'm gonna be able to be able to be able to my hair, running to my head, running to my dad, running to my head, running to my day, running to my day, running to my day, running to my day,

I'm gonna dance and night, oh, oh, it's dance, dance, and dance, and my today. I'm I I'm trying to... the true.

the today.

the true.

I'm just

together.

I'm gonna

together.

My

try and try to do my heart, I'm gonna tipa,

I'm gonna tipa's a night, I'm gonna be nice and I.

Let me tell you I could tell you a lot of my skin's a mask of your head and telling me cuss. Maybe you're hands of their eyes.

I don't believe such a threat and surprise.

What you're possible to say you're gone to be happy when you're acting in my eyes. I could be here when the phone treatment. After closing my eyes, but I think you know what a perfect place,

where it's just in me, but nobody else, so we think we'd be.

All the treaty, that, everything,

I'm gonna run into my head, I'm gonna,

the go to my eyes. Only teach everyone, theyry and run into the world, running through their tomorrow,

the tuber, that's a good, running to their own.

Everyone's the day, running to the world,

the treatment, the together.

I'm gonna be the-

the game. Oh, I'm not. I may make something called a flash.

This makes up the corner flash.

This makes my room.'re there so much.

But I fly away, it's so moving.

Come on all my best, wash your blood the shawl of the shame.

When you're friends there, don't worry me.

Because I'll be in the heart, what you see me for me?

I can try to pretend, I can try to pretend.

But yeah, but you're starting the man.

So I'm not gonna be happy.

I'm gonna run to my life.

I'm gonna go.

I'm gonna stand.

try andto make it. You're a today. All the things.

I'm today.

It's a

and the.

It's not.

All the together.

All the today. All the treaty. All the treaty.

All the treaty.

All the treaty.

I'm today.

You're gonna be the.

the today.

I'm fucking at me.

Tell me.

What do you say?

Yes, I am a wonderful bird.

Baking, looking at that, will I, tell them, hey, I, look the best, try to to be the true

I'm gonna today

I'm gonna say

running to my hair

running tomorrow

running to my head

today

running to the the today

running l the today, I'm gonna be today, I'm gonna be today.

I'm gonna be today.

I'm gonna be today.

I'm Princess Hall. I feel like I'm in Prince's house, I'm fatal on the water-hawn, sitting down on the slanty couch and I can't see straight arms great, uh-huh.

22 I'm in Paris baby, got strangers, tittings in my face, uh-huh.

Pull up in a fancy, I'm on Christian, I'm fancy and I want... Banda, oh,to my face, uh-huh. Pull up and I fancy. I'm Christian, I want fancy, you want...

I want... I'm fine, uh-huh.

Oh, uh-huh.

Oh, uh-huh.

Oh, uh-huh.

Oh, uh-huh.

Oh, the to the paper. I don't need a chest, no power.

How do you need you five but I don't like?

How are you winning your mouth?

Are you ready to make that paper?

I don't need a chance no, wow?

I don't need you to fly but I don't like how you're winning your mouth?

Your side feels from East and now that I've got my

money coming from now and I.

I feel like how many dances how old smokedough

make her on the winter.

Sit down on this fancy couch and I can't see straight upstake.

22 I'm in Paris baby got stooped as a tick to my face.

Uh-huh.

All up and I'm Benny, you want Christian, I was Fendi was Fendi

I was Farns'a'u

Oh, uh-huh.

Fah Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.

Oh, oh.

Oh, the tree. I I'm not going to be able to try to be able to be able to be able to be able to be today. I feel like I'm in Prince's house,

I'm a little toward, sitting down on a slighed couch and I can't see straight

I'm straight. Twenty-two I'm in pairs, Paris baby got strippers tiped in my face

Uh-huh.

Pull up with her birthday, I'm Christian, I want friends and you want

Fendley, you want... I already make the paper, I don't need a how you running your mouth? Are you ready to keep that paper, I don't need a chest out cloud.

I don't need you five, but I don't like.

How are you running your mouth now?

You're a sad piece from East and now that fits yourself.

Baby, baby, I got only committed from going on.

I feel like how many fences house,

make him on the window. Sit down on the slant couch and I can't see straight on the street.

I'm stater. I'm in Paris, baby. Got to stick this tick to my best.

Uh-huh. Pull up in a band's knee. You want Christian. I want Wendy, you want... I'm standing with any one. Oh

Oh

Oh

Oh Oh

Oh Oh

Oh Yeah I'm a today. Thank you. I'm gonna watch a day I'm gonna be

a little

I

the

the the trying to try to make a try. I'm not gonna be able to go to the world. I'm I I'm goingtrying to try to make a try to make a try to make a trying to get a tb-I'm a tb-I'm a today. I I I'm trying to try to

the today Oh Welcome.

Welcome to the Infrared Webcast.

Now, I have some bad news, which is simultaneously great news.

This may be the last stream of this week, or at least the weekday.

But the next time I stream, which is going to be not that far off, you are going to see me.

It's going to be a big surprise.

I'll have a new background. Not permanent, but you're in for a treat. I

can tell you that. Lot is in the work. Lots in the works. Okay? You know, some of those book

stuff put it on hold very briefly because big stuff in the

works, very big stuff, very exciting stuff.

I can't wait to share with you more.

I can't.

I gotta keep my mouth shut now.

But, uh, it's happening.

So, this infrared shit is legit. You understand? This is legit. And I want to talk about that for a second.

Just before I get into the topics that I wanted to talk about, we've been on a journey

of self-discovery finding ourselves. What is infrared? Where are we? Where are we at? Right? And there was a huge

overcorrection when it came to our dealings or our fighting with the pan leftists. And that's

the new word we use to describe it in the pan leftist.

There's a lot of overcorrection in our community. We tended to overlook a lot

of the right-wing ideologies, people who are coming from the right, who are

kind of transitioning over to us, we were very forgiving, to an extent

we still are, to an extent, there was a lot of things we decided to overlook because

that wasn't the primary contradiction.

But we're no longer in a position of fighting the, I keep repeating this, the pan leftists

are no longer the primary contradiction.

I just blocked them now, right? We've gotten to a point we don't need to prove how we're distinct from them.

Because we spread the Maga Communism slogan so far and wide, because we succeeded in cementing that as its own thing, we don't need to prove that we are a distinct from the pan leftist anymore.

It's done.

Now we can focus on the positive aspects of infrared and what we're trying to build in the positive sense.

And part of what that what's that's going to be is a level of maturity.

You know this was this has been for a long time. I'm not saying we're going to stop joking or we're going to stop

with the humor and stuff, but we're going to be starting to crack down. Sorry, we're

going to start cracking down on a lot of the stupid edgy behavior of some of the

people in the community, particularly when it comes to women in the community.

I'm not talking about your general views on women. That's your own business. That's your own opinion

But you know specifically this thing about random women coming in the discord and then people fucking

Taking out their private grievances on them.

Strangers, yeah we're not going to tolerate that anymore.

Infrared is not a parochial, comfy zone.

I want to clarify something, right?

We are not groopers. We are not groipers. We are not groipers.

You know what I mean when I say we are not groipers? What I mean to say is that we're our own thing.

That is a completely separate phenomenon. It has nothing to do with us.

And I want to be very explicit about this.

All that stuff from 2016, all that alt-right stuff, I don't know what your background might be where you came from

Doesn't matter. We're here now, but all that stuff from 2016

You're gonna have to fucking leave that shit behind

Because we're looking toward the future now and there's no room for failure. There's no room for incompetence

There's no room for this old musty dusty nonsense

Infrared is a groundbreaking completely brand new, shining, polished.

It's like that shit from that SpongeBob episode where they go into the future.

All right?

We're not here to go back into the caveman or whatever, that primitive shit

where they were in the jungle or whatever.

We're going into that shit in SpongeBob where they found themselves in the jungle or whatever. We're going into that shit in

SpongeBob where they found themselves in the future, you understand? Shiny

chromatic, you understand? And you can have whatever private views you want. I'm

not saying you got to compromise that. And I'm also not saying there's something wrong with

banter, especially you know with your friends, banter with your friends. Be as

sexist and racist as you want who gives a fuck, right? It's not serious. But when it

comes to how you behave and interact with strangers, you got to act

professional, you got gotta act courteous,

you gotta have some good faith, and you can't just be, you know, you can't just be treating

this like, I don't, I'm not a fan of that whole aesthetic of like, oh, we're gonna get

comfy and we're just gonna make this comfortable for

your own particular parochial, you know, background and make it comfy for you.

It's like, no, this shit ain't comfy, mother fucker.

Only the toughest and the strongest are making it out into this

future. You understand? Got no room for that weakness. Got no room for that. Oh, girls

have cooties. Ain't got no room for that. You understand? Man the fuck up. Damn. Man the fuck up. That nonsense. You know, we don't have to,

we're not going to be a corporate HR department, but we're also not going to be on some man-child shit, internet gamer gate man-child shit.

I don't know what the fuck to call it.

That's them anime profile pictures.

You understand?

That's what the whole anime.

Is that what you are?

Don't be an anime profile picture in all but form. You understand, we're a completely different, separate thing.

We are future-oriented. We got that infrared vision beyond the visible spectrum.

You want to know what that means?

It means you have to start filtering yourself. I'm so fucking sick of hearing

about drama, people bitching and complaining about beating banned from the

discord. You want to know why you got banned from the discord? Because you

didn't put on a filter. We're not asking you to know why you got banned from the discord? Because you didn't put on a filter.

We're not asking you to change your opinions.

That's up to you.

I can't force you to have an opinion

that you don't want to have.

But what I can force you and command of you

is to show some fucking discipline,

especially on discord where there isn't any free speech and it's not even our fucking fault.

You understand?

Have a damn filter.

And by the way, it's a good skill to have in life.

When you go and meet people from other countries, you can't be so comfortable, but you're just

going to act however the fuck you want to act.

You have to have a filter.

You have to have a sense of formality and professionalism.

Because guess what?

Not everyone shares your culture.

Not everyone shares your specific background.

Not everybody is fucking like you.

And we're never going to be like those fucking right wingers.

You understand?

Because all those right wingers, and it's only a tiny minority in the community trying to be

inspired by that. I'm not saying the majority of you are at fault but there's a

minority. Let me explain to me to you guys those right wingers as as comfy and

and warm as as they are with oh yeah we're all the same race and culture, we all come in the same background, we totally get each other, we have this,

they are the most cannibalistic, vicious motherfuckers on earth.

The amount of backstabbing, the amount of doxing and swatting and fucking shit they do against each other.

It's crazy.

It's even more than leftists.

Those people are trying to kill each other all the time.

We're not having that, all right?

That whole, you know, when you try to act like a manchild and conform the world to your

familiar sensibilities, guess what?

You know, we're here.

We're here to deal with the alienation.

You know what I mean?

We have to confront the alienation.

What do I mean by the alienation? What was Marx's

slogan? Nothing human is alien to me. AI is alien and scary. The future is alien and scary. Guess what? We're fucking embracing it. And we are

confronting it with our sober senses, accepting the inevitability of the future. It cannot be stopped.

You understand? And this is a great way for me to transition into this topic.

Because I am kind of so shocked, I'm appalled, the backlash against these beautiful new AI technologies that I'm seeing.

Wow. I'm seeing tweets with 150,000 likes, 200,000 likes.

Regulate AI now, ban AI now.

And I'm like, what?

We're gonna, first of all, who the fuck are these people trying to impose

their sensibilities on me? You're a fucking furry.

I'm gonna sit here and you're gonna force your taste on me. You're a fucking furry. I'm gonna sit here and you're gonna force your

tastes on me and I have we have to sacrifice actual fucking historical progress

because you're too much of a fucking baby to grow the fuck up and embrace the

future. Fuck you literally. How is nobody pissed? baby to grow the fuck up and embrace the future?

Fuck you, literally.

How is nobody pissed about this?

I never get, listen, maybe I am AI.

My race is AI.

You want to know why?

Because I never get offended over race or religion on a personal level.

Chancellor, what's going on? I don't get offended about race or religion on a personal level.

Like I don't give a fuck. You know? You could say whatever dumbass shit you want.

It's not going to offend me. I don't care. But this whole like

cancel AI thing is just I don't know why that pisses me off so much. What the

fuck is that? Yeah we're gonna just kill this in its cradle because it makes these fucking people uncomfortable.

But, and, and how corrupt is that? How corrupt is that? We have to agree that furry artists are real art, and that's, we have to actually give them our money too

because they're saying oh you know we're so many people are going to get fired

it's like well then go fucking get a job at Wendy's what entitles you to have

the job of being an artist? Nothing. That's like me

saying I'm entitled to being a streamer. You know? Oh, I'm entitled, I'm entitled as a streamer,

right? Imagine if that was my mindset creating infrared, that I'm entitled to everyone's money.

And I'm entitled to have cloud.

And I'm entitled to have people.

No, infrared's a thing because gorillas are down with it.

You understand?

Gorillas are rolling with it. What's up, Hot Take? Because Hot Take is rolling with it. You understand? Gorillas are rolling with it. What's up, Hot Take?

Because Hot Take is rolling with it, you understand? That's why Infrared is a

thing. I'm not telling Hot Take he's a bad person for not giving me money.

What makes me better than anyone else? You know, I'm not entitled to shit. We're all equal

You know in the sense we're not entitled to nothing sleep or sell what's going on?

So that shit, um, I know I'm talking vulgar and stuff, but I'm really pissed off about the anti-AI

stuff.

It's like, damn, these people need to go in jail.

I don't know, fucking deport them.

Anyone trying to hold back the forces of production needs to be deported.

Blackpack, what's going on

nabi what's going on black pack wow god damn black pack is the reason

infrareds around you know know what I'm saying?

Kami Yeats, what's up?

I guess the reason I'm really pissed and I, you know, it's never good to be angry, by the way.

Nabi, what's going on? It's never good to be angry, all right? And every time I'm angry it warrants a self-criticism and it warrants me breaking down the thing

So that we could all be a little more calm about it, right?

Understand what we're understanding. We should use it to inspire us. We should be we should turn this anger we have, I'm sure you have it too, and turn that

anger into energy that inspires us to do great things, to take advantage of this growing

technology.

To use it with the utmost degree of ruthlessness without any hesitation whatsoever.

Use it as a tool.

Use it as a medium from which and with which the infrared message,

the message of Marxism-Leninism in the age of multipolarity,

the message of an American Marxism proliferates, uninhibited.

That's what it should inspire us to do.

But it pisses me off because I'm seeing these disgusting freaks, these lump and scumbags

who laughed at farmers that are indebted, losing their farms being crushed under debt, calling them Kulaks and Petty

Buzwa, and claiming that them getting gobbled up by parasitic monopolies is somehow

historically progressive, them claiming that the devastation of people's livelihoods, be

it small businesses being destroyed and not even just small businesses, also actual industrial

workers, they have such a snobbish pseudo-accelerationist attitude toward

these masses of human beings, whose misfortunes don't just affect them individually, but

affect entire families and communities.

And it's really creating a crisis of humanity, the fentanyl crisis.

You know, people just starting to kill themselves on a large skill.

It's devastating the bonds that hold America together as a country, as a people.

I mean, it's a profound tragedy.

And I'm not the one saying we can return to the past.

That's not what I'm saying.

But the people that are angry about this and are trying to fight back against it,

even if their methods are not, and they're never advanced when they're spontaneous, right?

The methods of the proletariat are always primitive at the outset. But the lack of sympathy with these people undergoing

this process of the devastation of their livelihoods and their humanity, you know,

they always disguise that as some kind of like edgy,

ha ha, progress wins, no matter what, ha ha.

But now that AI is out and like what,

people who work at Disney or people who work for Hollywood

as writers or digital artists even worse are

going to face the prospect of being laid off.

Now we're supposed to be sentimental romantics who think we should inhibit the development

of the productive forces.

Mind you, the emiseration of small farmers and small businesses

isn't corresponding to any historically progressive phenomena.

It's not like these are being replaced by more advanced

productive forces. Maybe in the case of Walmart or Amazon you can make the case,

but in a lot of cases it's the de-growth thing. A lot of people are just losing

their livelihood because production overall is becoming neglected and

it's just things are getting depopulated and there's a crisis of birth rates and there's

a crisis of entire towns dying, right? And there's nothing about that that's historically progressive

in terms of the productive forces or new relationships of production. But when it comes to digital artists, now we should be, now we're gonna fucking hold

back progress.

What happened to the uninhibited progressivism, right?

Doesn't that piss you off at least a little bit?

That disgusting hypocrisy?

Like at least be consistent.

They don't even have the decency to do that.

They're so shamelessly self-serving that they're attacking AI purely because they themselves

on a personal level come from the creative professional background.

They don't care about communism or Marxism or whether or not this is commensurate with

an impersonal scientific analysis.

They're just shamelessly asserting their own personal interests over the interests

of the country, over the interests of the people, over the interests of humanity.

Imagine if I tailored Infrared's entire message around being a lawyer or being a streamer.

And it's just my personal background imposed on everyone.

And I'm putting that in front of the interests of the whole people and the whole country.

What kind of communist would I be if I did that, right?

How disgusting is that? These people have no shame. But I'm not going to even be angry

toward them. I'm past that. Because when you're angry toward them, you're just giving them a reason to continue living

and continue existing.

That's the truth.

These people are lump and social scum that will be the...

And this is how karma's a bitch.

You understand, they are going to face far more

of a bleak future than the farmers

and the workers that they're sneering at and jeering at.

And let us find consolation in that fact.

You know, I keep, you know, in terms of the responses to the, I was expecting the responses to be way more severe.

But the main one is like, people are just like, ha, I didn't read that.

Which is interesting to say the least.

Why would you take the time out to say that?

But it also shows, there

is no real rational response to infrared, either from leftists or the right wing, because

a lot of right wingers were also pissed off about what I wrote. And none of them can come

up with any kind of rational response. that sounds old every single streamer or

Alternate political lead. I mean, I'm sure Jay Dyer likes to claim that or something right

But in when I say it, I actually mean it that this is actually the case. There's no rational response. The chain

of discursive communication and exchange is it's just been closed. There's no way

for them to respond to us in a rational way. And I think the prerequisite for dialogue is recognition, right?

And why is it that people find it so hard to recognize someone's argument? Why is it always about dismissing it? Oh, too long didn't read.

Why is that the knee-jerk response? Well, it's simple.

When you recognize the argument of the other, you risk potentially and eventually giving particular

determination to reason itself.

You're giving reason a particularity,

a receptacle of particularity,

which is fundamentally incompatible with liberalism and the bourgeois ideology corresponding to it. In the bourgeois ideology, there can never be a concrete and particular receptacle of rationality.

There can never be, for example, Stalin was lied about,

this is the true story. There can never be, for example,

this is the true history of Korea. This is the true history of the Korean people.

We have been lied about and here we are arguing and making our case against this, right?

The minute you're even, The minute you're even,

the minute you're even minimally willing to hear out what the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

has to say about itself, its history, and its nationality,

the minute you open yourself up to that,

suddenly the total openness of rationalism becomes enclosed. You're enclosing it into a specific and particular context

where it acquires the status of a concrete totality.

It's actually a particular determination of reason.

I always notice Western tourists when they travel to China, when they travel to North Korea,

when they travel to these countries, they always have to like keep telling themselves

as a mantra, this is propaganda, this is propaganda, this is propaganda, they can never recognize

the meaningfulness of what the Chinese, what the Koreans are trying to tell them, what that means for those people.

Because it's too particular. It's too particular in the sense of being a response within the dialectic.

Liberalism only has one assertion

which does not tolerate any response.

Just I assert this, no response is possible for me to entertain.

So obviously they're not going to read anything I say or listen to anything I say in a rational

manner because this is a dialectic. This is not, I'm not just conveying the one-sided assertions

of liberalism, I'm responding critically.

And to even entertain that, to even recognize the possibility that I might be saying something at all would be to give

particularity to the determination of reason, right? Everything has to be a one-sided

thrust with no conclusion.

Just a complete, a complete conductivity.

A complete, seamless... conductivity a complete seamless

um

seamless seamless alignment with you, the one-sided assertion and monopoly over how reality

is understood.

People don't read and people need to start reading and I'm going to do my best to encourage that. People need to start reading.

Okay?

I have, there's no one, there's no critic of infrared who has actually responded to us.

Everything they say I've already responded to, or within two minutes in a debate they would they would have no standing even by their own reasoning and their own logic and there's just no exceptions to that.

And this is why I've just started to block people on a mass scale. Because it's like, listen, I'll debate you.

I'll fucking debate you. You know that.

But you don't want to debate.

So what you want to do is what, jack herself off?

I don't want to be involved in that. So go fucking do that on your own.

You know?

It's not that I'm a technological optimist.

It's not that I'm trying to sell you AI.

AI's here no matter whether we say it's good or it's bad, right?

I just believe in authentically being honest about what our reality is.

I'm not here to say AI is good or AI is bad.

I'm here to say this is our reality and these disgusting digital artists and pan-leftists

on social media who are attacking AI are disgusting subhuman

hypocrites who are lying to us about what our reality actually fucking is.

A good example of this is how they say, oh, AI is just going to lead to mass-produced garbage.

How many of these original digital artists you see produce unique, unique art?

Does any of it look unique?

It all literally looks like recycled shit that in no way contributes to the history of art.

There's no novelty there.

And if you don't know that, you're just not familiar with the fucking history of art.

I'm sorry to fucking tell you, but just because a picture gives

you fuzzy feelings inside and you like it doesn't mean it's fucking art. It's

just as much a mimicry of it's not real art because it's not original.

So Malavich's Black Square was actually original.

Socialist realism was original.

Impressionism was original.

Symbolism was original.

These are all chapters in the history of art

that contributed novel contributions to the history of art.

If you're just creating something that looks cool or looks nice, that's not art. We have exhausted a long time ago,

I would say Malavich and the black square was the end of any novelty in the realm of, I'm

gonna have a painting and I'm just gonna paint something on it and this is gonna be a groundbreaking historical contribution to art

The black square was the absolute last

work of art

That could express itself through a visual medium at least at least in in terms of painting okay or drawing

or whatever else you know a static 2d image ends with the black square okay

I'm sick of being gaslit about how this is the death of art by fucking retards who don't

know anything about the history of modern art.

I'm really sick of it because they're Philistines in the literal sense of the word.

They think that they woke up yesterday and they learned how to doodle on Adobe Illustrator

and that makes them fucking artists without literally knowing anything about how artists in

the past were actually trying to give expression to the entirety of what reality was.

They were actually trying to express the truth of universal existence

in a way that had not been done before.

And if it was done before, then art is it does it there's no need for it.

Okay?

Modern art is dead.

It's dead and it's gone.

So this is a new era of art which is irreducible to individual works.

There's no single picture. There's no single image. There's not even a single movie or TV show or anything

That suffices to constitute a work of art

That is dead. That's over. That's high art. That is dead, that's over. That's high art. High art is gone. So how has

art, how can art survive and live past that? I'll tell you. Art has taken on a thematic character. Art has taken on a thematic character.

Art has taken on the character of being irreducible to single works, but rather entire themes,

which thread, and like a gestalt, which thread together many particular

components into one bigger vision or movement or phenomena.

That's how art exists today.

It's like art arises only in bulk only with a flood of cheap, stupid shit, taken as a whole, a flood of it, can you start to discern a singular artistic vision.

The era of individuals producing art is over.

That's what I'm trying to tell you.

Individual production of art is over.

Art has become irreversibly socialized.

A work of art is something that is inadvertently produced by a community or by a society or by a country.

No longer is it produced by an individual. And this is old

news, by the way, this is not even today, this is old news. This is what Malovich

was proving. Socialist realism. The era of mass produced state propaganda as art was the beginning of this.

Okay? The beginning of giving expression to reality in bulk as an overall theme reflecting the movement

of history and society, give an expression ultimately when taken from a bird's eye view in an inadvertent way, that is art.

You understand?

You know, these stupid trad art accounts.

Oh, why don't we go back to fucking statues and shit?

Because you're the same thing as a fucking

furry artist you stupid fuck you're the same thing you just want something that

looks fucking cozy and looks nice fine then just say you want it to look nice and cozy. Don't fucking call it art,

you fucking retard. Because a furry thinks that those disgusting drawings of, I don't even

know what it is, cartoon animal porn, that's what makes them

cozy and fuzzy inside.

So when you see Greek Colosseums, and that makes you fuzzy inside, that's not an artistic

experience, that's just you wanting a pleasant. I'm not against that.

I'm not saying that's necessarily bad. But stop confusing that for art because it's not what fucking art is.

Art is supposed to convey and express the truth of existence, the truth of

universal reality, ruthlessly, without compromise. And it's not about making

you feel fuzzy inside.

It's about delivering you to a profound appreciation

Of the reality you take as a premise

in some kind of way.

It's like I'm not a right-wing trad, trad art, you know. Thatthat's fucking larp it's the same thing as

the pan leftist degenerate nod they're both degenerate actually they're both

fucking degenerate how many stupid disgusting homosexual neo-nazizi, what are they fucking called? What is it called where

it's like pink and it's from the 80s, that style, return to tradition and there's like a

fucking swastika moving and it's pink and it's

what is that, synth wave? Yeah that's art dude. Synth wave is art. You are a fucking retard.

Vapor wave. vapor wave vapor wave I mean where I'm not here to be in 2016 I'm not here for that.

Why is infrared the only ones that are like at the avant-garde of history right now?

You notice that? Like on an aesthetic level, why are we the only ones?

And even if we're not, we're trying, right? We're actually trying to embrace the present

we live in. We're the only ones doing that. Everyone else is trying to copy some old bullshit.

Meanwhile, we're here trying to actually... copy some old bullshit.

Meanwhile, we're here trying to actually

embrace the future in some kind of way, uh, of, of a, of a cute animal that's smiling and it's also gay.

That's a work of art. It's a warm, colorful cartoon, studio Gilby.

Shut the fuck up!

You psychotic retard. You're just a consumer trying to consume.

How, who does that inspire? Who does that inspire?

You know, art is supposed to inspire you to work. That's literally the truth.

You want to know the truth of what art is? It's supposed to inspire you to work. That's literally the truth. You want to know the truth of what art is? It's supposed

to inspire you to work. It's supposed to inspire you to stop ogling at fucking images and

actually make something. You know what it means to make something? It means to accept

the inadvertence of your actions

and the results of your actions. There's never going to be a one-to-one input and output.

You need to make peace with that. The minute you recognize that is when you understand the sage-like wisdom of Stalin, Mao, etc., etc.

Give recognition to the dialectical nature of reality.

But nobody wants that.

Everyone wants to just reproduce, incestuously, and recycle their

parochial, narrow, comfy little fucking feelings and have that reflected to them on the screen.

And then, and then, these people, both thethe pan-leftist, they're not real left-wing,

the pan-leftists and the far-right Nazis, both then have the pretension, this is the best part,

of calling their incestuous masturbatory slop high art.

High art that they used to acquire some kind of snobbishness around.

Oh, I'm a true based right wing or traditionalist.

You know, I saw some faggot say that, oh, Haas is a barbarian, Phoenician.

He's barbaric... Shut the fuck up, you bitch. You're a faggot and a pussy. Some neo-Nazi

bitch was saying this. Has it no true art in true taste and AI he didn't

even read my shit and he's he's acting like he's an aristocratic high-class

mug we will hang you, bitch!

Guine! I'm on some robespeer time, you fucking bitch!

I will humble you.

Just like Genghis Khan, humbled people behind their cities

and behind their walls.

Don't fuck with me.

In a video game, not being like literal. We're not actually gonna do it. I'm saying spiritually. That's what we're about.

I'm a barbarian. Of course I'm a fucking barbarian.

You think I'm a faggot like you wearing a powdered wig?

I am a barbarian. Let's talk a I'm sick of people hiding behind walls.

Israel hides behind walls.

I'm sick of people hiding behind walls.

I want to besie these walls.

That's what's in my... Yeah, I'm athese walls. That's what's in my, yeah I'm a barbarian.

That's what's in my Mongolic ancestral DNA that I just made up right now but I feel in my

heart. You understand? I'm gonna break this shit down hiding behind that shit acting

like you're tough, acting like you're better than

others.

Fuck you.

You ain't shit.

You need to be humbled.

I'm a god damn Ottoman warrior with a Dardalius gun or whatever that shit was called,

but seizing your walls, bitch.

Bring that shit collapsing down.

He said, you could never be a true aristocrat with true aristocratic taste.

Okay, show me your aristocratic taste. Look at this painting,

this trad painting of a tree and there's a fucking apple on the tree and there's a

I don't fucking know shut the fuck up

Look at this trad painted look at this statue

Look at this statue

Yeah, that's true aristocratic taste, right? The real aristocrats of history, like the actual ones, hated.

They hated aristocracy.

That's the truth. You can't be an aristocrat if you're jacking yourself off like a bitch.

The true aristocrats stay humble. And don't forget where they come from. You know who the aristocrats were? They were warriors.

Those were people who fought, bled, and died in wars and battles.

You want to know what made them so aristocratic? Because they were about it, bitch, because they were standing on business.

They weren't sitting here jacking themselves off, feeling they were unconditionally superior to others,

they lived by the sword and they believed any day now they could die by the sword.

That's what it means to be a real fucking high, you know, big shot.

You understand?

You're stupid bitch.

You need to learn that.

You'll never learn it.

They'll never learn it.

They'll never learn it. We are living in the era of AI.

You know, AI is just revealing the truth of the society we already live in.

The aggregation of big data to produce patterns and meaningful results. That is literally,

literally, literally what socialist civilization is about. Socialist civilization isn't when some guy comes up and says,

I represent all people socially.

No, you're an individual.

You don't represent the whole social reality, because you're an individual, right?

Real socialist civilization is when we recognize and acknowledge the social, the common reality that we have that we're produced inadvertently, indirectly, in a way that's not the direct result of an individual will,

but which is an inadvertent common reality that underlies everyone's will, right?

And when we recognize that, we recognize the pattern. that underlies everyone's will, right?

And when we recognize that, we recognize the pattern

that binds us together, that's socialist civilization.

So that's what AI is.

You know, people are like, well, AI is just going to recycle its content so much.

I mean, first of all, you're just talking about AI art.

Second of all, that's not true.

And even if it was true,

who is stopping people from continuing to doodle and draw and paint or whatever?

No one. It's just that stupid, entitled people feel like they should be compensated for things they didn't even earn.

You know, I hate this stupid dichotomy. AI and humanity. What are you talking about?

AI is meaningless outside the context of humanity.

This is one of the problems with Landianism and the Landian ideology.

Nick Land was wrong.

Landianism did not deserve to have the resurgence that it did after 2016.

Straight up, didn't deserve it. We historicize and pay tribute to Nick Land in the 1990s, but this isn't the 90s, okay?

It didn't turn out to be true. That specific understanding of reality did not turn out out to be true.

Okay?

I'll explain why. All right. A lot of what Sadie Plant and Nick Land were talking about

was this kind of understanding that positive feedback loops are going to escape the confines of the of the normative context

in which they're entrapped and there's going to be this kind of runaway acceleration in infinitely many different directions.

This would later influence, you know, O-O-O, object-oriented ontology, but like, they were talking about how, like, you know, there's going to be this rhizic shattering of the consistency of universal humanity.

You know, techno-capitalism is going to go far off into the direction, positive feedback

loop into AI, climate change in one direction, the unleashing of a multitude and swarm of viruses on the other,

mass migration, cultural heterogeneity unleashed the destruction of all sexual normativity, etc, etc. So it is very much this kind of like all consistent

patterns are going to be assimilated into this rhizomatic, pure chaos, this heat-fucked chaos or whatever right that's not well

that's not the zeitgeist of the 2010s or even the 2020s for that matter the zeitgeist of AI in the

2020s and I've talked about this before the zeitgeist of the 2020s, and I've talked about this before, the zeitgeist of the 2010s, is about

how out of all of this chaos, out of this aggregate, let's call it, there's some kind of singular and consistent pattern which is a negative feedback loop.

It's not a runaway positive feedback loop.

It's a homeostatic negative feedback loop, reproducing the consistency of, for example,

America in the case of Trump. Trump's whole thing was that he wanted to, you know, he wanted

to kind of, uh, re-ground the trajectory of America back into its own particularity,

one way or another, right?

The European populisms were likewise of the same nature, so it was not this kind of runaway positive feedback loops.

Now as far as the nature of how AI works, AI is not recursive. It's not recursive in

the sense of being self-conscious. It's not a mind. It's not recursive in the sense of being self-conscious.

It's not a mind.

It's not an artificial consciousness.

Art, you guys need to understand something.

Intelligence and consciousness are not the same thing.

Intelligence is about the ability to render reality intelligible or discernible.

The ability for distinctions to be given some kind of, I don't even want to say recognition, I would rather say distinctions

to be given some kind of, what's the word?

Some kind of practical responsivity, right? The ability for distinctions to be operationalized and given reality, right, by something other than themselves.

So, for... than themselves.

So for there to be an artificial intelligence, that doesn't mean there's an artificial

consciousness and there's going to be like a robot that's like, hi, I am AI.

You know, I saw this funny Spider-Man and Elsa Gate thing

back in the day.

And it was just this Indian guy who put on like a Adolf Hitler, what do you call it, webcam filter, where he could like talk as Hitler?

And it was like Hitler, like a floating Hitler head amidst a big background he was like,

hello kids, I am AI 2.0 and I am here to tell you right

now that, you know, AI is not a person, it's not a personality,

all right, an artificial intelligence is not a personality,

it's not a person, okay?

And all an artificial intelligence means

is something that can, let's say, discern patterns

out of a given set of content.

Okay, so that's, that's why it's giving,

it's rendering the content intelligible in some kind of way. It's deriving patterns out of some kind of object.

That's all artificial intelligence means.

What patterns it's going to derive is fully, fully socially determined by human

beings. It's just that it's not determined by any of us directly, by our individual will.

You understand? So that's the significance of AI. It's not a fucking

person. It's not like, oh I mean, you know, even Elon Musk does this. It's like,

oh my god, is AI gonna one day turn against humanity and it's like,

what do you mean by that?

How can AI turn against humanity?

The content of AI is humanity at the aggregate collective social level.

So if AI turns against humanity, that's just us

turning against ourselves in a way we're not being responsible for. For example,

and here's another thing we need to ditch. AI is not just a, this is why it's not just a tool, okay?

The utilitarian paradigm of like, oh, everything's just a tool and I'm the I'm the aristocratic

human and I'm just going to use this thing as a means to fulfill my pre-

determined ends. No, that's gay British utilitarianism and it's wrong.

AI is not just a tool.

Tools are not just tools.

They participate in determining the content of both what we are and what we seek to produce as our object.

They participate in the realization of what the object is.

Okay?

So AI is neither an autonomous consciousness,

nor is it a tool.

It's neither of those things. What AI actually is is a it's an

I'm not going to repeat okay. Let me let me let me let me say this again. AI is neither

AI is not a personality, nor is it just a tool.

It's a new way for humanity to relate to its own existence, and in particular the relationship between

individuals and the inadvertently social existence that they inadvertently

help produce. So that's what AI actually is. It's not a personality and it's not just a tool.

To imply that it's just a tool means that we have the conceit of knowing with certainty

what our object is. We don't have that certainty. The AI participates

in many ways in the object. And I'll explain that, for example. I want to use AI to make

infrared art. You'll say that, right? I want to use AI to make infrared art, you'll say that, right? I want to use AI to make infrared

adjut prop or to make CPSA 2036 adjut prop, right? Well, the contents of the infrared

agit prop and the content of the CPSA

2036 adjut prop, a lot of the times,

and this is proven, right, a lot of the times the content of that

is itself futurism.

It's just like futuristic adjut prop,

where like the form is in the content.

So you're not just using AI, you're actually creating something, or sorry, you're participating

in the realization of something in just an honest way. That's why our shit is honest, right?

When we have infrared adjut prop that y'all are making with AI,

usually it's like at least a little futuristic and it it contains and depicts a reality itself affected by AI.

That's why we are an art project, bitch.

Because we're uniting the form and the content.

Like, the output of what we're making with AI is propaganda for AI itself. It's propaganda at least that

depicts or recognizes a reality that has been irreversibly affected by AI. So it's not just a tool because the reality itself has been irreversibly

affected by the tool, right? Therefore the content of what we seek to give

expression to has been inadvertently affected by the very means by which it's realized.

It's a perfectly dialectical answer to the stupidity of utilitarianism.

Visit Dad, what's up?

What's up? What's up, visit Dad? Um...

People are so stupid, they're like, AI could never possibly produce art,

because it's empty and soulless.

And it's like, it's so stupid.

AI is not producing art.

We are curating with our sensibilities, outputs, which taken together

in a thematic way is artistic.

It's not that the AI is producing the art, that's impossible.

The AI is participating in the realization of art.

Why shouldn't it?

Strayla Stanny, what's up?

They're like, well, whereas AI just draws from past precedent, individuals contain the

infinite mystery of personality, which makes their work of art irreducibly unique. And it's like well isn't the individual mystery

of personality also at play in the process of curation and the exercise of aesthetic discretion when it comes to choosing whether the AI output is satisfying your intended result?

Because you could just be lazy.

I mean, this is a big misconception of AI art. Why does everyone assume

That it's like entails laziness

If you're just as industrious as you are with traditional a mediums if you're just as industrious with AI, your output, what

you're capable of producing is so much greater. And the truth is, most digital, real

digital artists

probably are combining AI art with traditional mediums.

They're not solely relying on AI to produce outputs,

but they're combining the power of AI with methods already at play.

What's up anonymous? So what's wrong with that, you know?

Honestly, what's wrong like the way that the AI attaches images to prompts.

Well it's like, guess what?

Guess who's at fault for that?

We as society are.

What's up, sleeper cell? Let's say we put in the prompt, beautiful man,

right? Let's say we put that as the prompt. And the output is like some fat horrific monstrosity, you know, who's just hideous, right?

That's not AI's fault. That's our fault as a society for associating that word with images that look like that. That's what we've done. And it's inadvertent that we've produced this, that we've done it in a way where this is the aggregate result but we're still responsible for it.

So this is why AI is our fault.

It's not AI's fault.

It's our fault.

You understand?

That's what I'm trying to say.

It's only going to give us what we deserve.

AI only gives humanity what it deserves and nothing else. Only gives us what we deserve.

So if you complain about the result, don't blame the technology.

Blame us. Blame our civilization. Blame our society. Blame our social reality.

Don't blame the technology. I absolutely love the shit people are saying like, oh my god, it's stealing people's labor.

Jesus Christ, when is it going to end? Like when are we just going

to be free of these like fucking retards? Why do you need to use Marx's language?

Why do you need to do that? Like why? There's clearly no

fucking connection. Emotional labor. Why do you need to keep opportunistically

dragging Marxism into this? I don't fucking understand it.

Because you're a weak, pathetic piece of shit who needs to use this reputable old

man from the 19th century associated with some of the most powerful states on

earth to back up your disgusting, petty, bourgeois,

degenerate filth, because it would otherwise have no sanction, no credibility, and no authority

with which it could justify itself on the basis of.

That's why you have to fucking use Marxism.

And I'm sorry. I'm not here to demonize, you know, or hunt or attack LGBTs. I'm not here to attack them.

But I'm here to ask the following question.

Why is...

Why is...

Why is...

Why is the sexualization of a man's booty hole progressive but AI is not?

No one's ever explained that.

Why are we reactionaries for being critical of the LGBT movement?

But you're not a fucking reactionary for opposing new technologies.

I don't get it. Why is it pro- why am I a reactionary if I'm skeptical of chopping off children's

dicks?

But you're not a fucking reactionary for literally trying to resist and react to actual fucking historical progress.

I don't get it.

Do you know what I mean?

How does that fucking make sense?

Why are we the reactionaries?

What is reaction?

Infrared is reactionary.

Why? I'll be because they're critical of the LGBT movement.

And you know what? What's up, Sleeper Cell? Let me tell you something.

In good faith, here's what I'll say. In good faith, I'll be like, you know what?

Maybe what they're trying to say is

that if you're unable to recognize how new relationships of production have changed sexuality

or a reactionary, I agree with that, but all I'm trying to say is that both the right wing and the LGBT movement are reactionaries

to these new relationships of production.

The new relations of production aren't erasing our humanity.

It's not erasing humanity itself.

This is what we need to start doubling down on. They're literally the reactionaries. They're

the ones reacting to progress. Not us. Okay. No, it's not progressive to just have decay and decline

and incest and metanumy and insulation and just sameness and stagnation. That's not progress, that's the opposite of progress.

You know, I understand how there is something that's happened where, you know, sexuality has been irreversibly divorced from any sense of like,

natural normalcy because of pornography, right?

Because of even just the possibility that there could be all these sexual minorities running around.

So I get that. Nobody's here trying to like literally reproduce the exact state of society

in the 1950s. It's not possible. But that doesn't mean heterosexuality isn't objectively still the norm of humanity.

That doesn't mean, for example, there isn't an objective truth to it that's irreducible to its phenomenalization.

That doesn't mean it's not natural either. It just means that

it's not a given. And by the way, why should it be a given? Right? And no society

and history have rights of initiation into adulthood been taken for granted.

To be a man in the Ottoman Empire, you had to fucking get military contription, right?

To be a man in the Mongols, I don't know, maybe they had, you had to shoot your first

bow on the back of a horse or some shit.

And they had different rights of initiation for women as well.

So it's like, it's never been a given,

but that doesn't mean there's no natural humanity to it.

So like, I don't understand how anyone can call us the reactionaries, but they're not

react...

I mean, I don't get it.

I don't get it.

What is progressive about men sniffing each other's butts?

Can anyone explain? Can anyone explain what's

progressive about men sniffing each other's beehines? I mean what's progress?

How is that progress? Like how was that, how is that Bringing history forward?

How are women scissoring each other bringing history forward?

How what what is that advancing?

They're having orgasms. Okay, how where? How, what, what is that advancing?

They're having orgasms, okay, how, where, so what's it, what is that advancing?

Like, what's the result of that?

They're getting off on, okay, so what,

where's the progress?

I don't get it. How is that fucking progress? But AI isn't? I don't get it. I don't get it. The world's gone mad.

By the way, I don't hate any of these people. I don't hate them. I don't have hatred for you.

I just have questions about pan leftists claiming this is progress. Why is chopping your dick off progress?

What does that produce?

I mean, if you think about it, it produces less, right?

Because like now you can't have kids.

So you, so there will be no future for your right I mean am I wrong or what? I feel just crazy haze. I just yell all the time. What do I'm just crazy haze who yells on the mic every time? But I have to be the 19th century and like some guy invents the steam engine.

And then people are like, that's not progress. That's not progress.

You know, pederastry is real progress. That's not progress. The new trends in the French court

where they're wearing the powdered wig in this way, instead of this way.

That's true progress, right?

The new pederastry practices of molesting children, that's the real progress,

not the steam engine.

Like, that's the equivalent of what we're living in now.

Right? And I'm not surprised they had

guillotines and shit back then. I'm just saying, I'm not surprised. Like how else

do you fucking respond to that? I don't know, I mean, I get the whole ecological angle where it's like, okay, we've reached

the limit of industrial modernity and this notion of turning all of nature into a tool for humanity's own conceit is over.

And I agree about the end of utilitarianism, but industrial modernity doesn't begin or end with utilitarianism, okay?

The extent to which humanity participates in the process of unleashing

the productive forces and participates in the transformation and development of nature

isn't over. That has not come to an end. Why do we, why have we taken it for granted?

Not we, but like why have Pan left us taken it for granted?

And right wingers for that matter, because keep in mind we are the only technological acceleratist movement.

What about the EAC? That's not a political movement. What about the the EAC that's not a political movement? What about

the Landians? That's not a political movement. We're the only one. Okay? So like

why has everyone, why has everyone foreclosed the future? That's the real question. China is pumping

so much money into its science fiction. So much money. So, and there's a reason for that because they haven't forgotten the future.

We have.

And that's such a shame.

We just assume it's over.

We just have to... Listen, you know, there's such a good parable

between society and us as individuals. When you get depressed, sometimes you can get in

the state of mind of just like, oh, it's all over. What's the point?

I'm just going to be depressed and mope around and everything in my life is their fault and this person's fault.

And it's over and that's over. And then you can get in in that I'm sure you guys all have experience at least one time in your life getting in that bitch-made mentality right getting depressed

but then eventually you fucking realize hey I got shitto do, there's shit to be done, like my life

actually isn't over, and it's literally not over objectively, like I actually

have shit to do, I actually have a future. Whether it's good or bad, I have to embrace it. That's my future,

right? Same shit going on with society. We think we've gone to this point of

deep ecology. Oh, what about nature as a whole? Listen, we're killing ourselves all right we're absorbing ourselves of

responsibility for the present tasks at hand facing humanity the real tasks man

people need food they need to eat. People need food.

We got diseases to cure. We have infrastructure. It needs to be built. We've got economies that need to be developed. There's actual things we

got to deal with. Real problems we have to we are facing that we need to solve.

I mean you can you can everyone wants to be a right wing. I'm a Nietzsche and aristocrat.

You know what's sub-anonymous?

LGBT does not participate in the domestic economy.

This means roughly a five times larger income.

Heteronormative couples that have

have negative income factoring in SNLT.

Yeah, but I don't know who's

oppressed. But guys, why are right winger's like, I want to be an aristocratic

Nietzschean just looking. They meant, but, don't you know there's some shit dripping down your leg?

Can you at least go wipe it off?

Like we have problems to deal with, like real shit to deal with.

Time has not stopped.

History has not stopped history has not stopped

There's you want to be a base Nietzschean

F F F F F F F F wow

Oh man, oh man.

Oh man.

Always gotta happen to me.

Whenever the stream is gaining momentum is what happens, all right? I want to tell you

guys some, all right, because now that this, okay, the, it's not even the CIA, I

watched, it's not even the CIA, it's not even the FBI. It's literally the Department of

Homeland Security that's doing this to us. By the way, the Cyber Security Division of

the Homeland, Department of Homeland Security. Hi! Anyway, it's not the FBI, it's not the CIA.

The thing about the FBI is that all the FBI can do is catch you for doing things illegal.

Now sometimes they plant evidence and they do things like that.

But if the FBI is on you, then they're working a case against you to

prosecute you and throw you in jail. The CIA is mostly foreign facing, but it does participate

in domestic stuff. but most of the

domestic stuff got taken over by the DHS so I want to address them directly

all right Um, why, what's, what's even you, like, I'm gonna address these agents directly,

like what's even motivating you to live?

Are you just getting paid for this job?

Like, it's just your salary?

Like, what, what makes you for this job? Like it's just your salary?

Like what makes you motivated to wake up in the morning? Like do you care?

Like, why?

What's the meaning of life to you?

I'm genuinely curious.

Like, do you think you're right?

Because you're clearly not,

because in a debate you would get steamrolled by me, you know?

You're clearly not as smart as me.

You don't have the same grasp of history and philosophy as I do.

Are you at least curious at all?

I mean, what's even motivating you because you know what we're

living in Gorbachev-era Soviet Union right now and honestly I kind of

believe these people don't even like care they're not even motivated like they

don't even believe in anything. Like this is a country that's about to collapse.

And you're so focused on infrared in Jackson Hinkle.

Why? What are you...what's your angle here?

You know?

What's the angle? Like, what's the angle?

Like what's motivating you to continue being a crusade against what?

You know, I don't know.

I'm not angry at them. No.

I'm not angry at them at all. I'm just asking them like, what's the angle?

Yeah, what's motivating them?

I'm just curious, like what?

Because I have a motivation I wake up every single day for.

What is yours?

Joe Biden?

Really?

Joe Biden is what motivated?

Are you at least intellectually curious?

Do you even read books?

Do you even care about anything?

You clearly can't be getting paid. What do you get paid? 50K a year?

You know, just a page? I mean, I don't know.

I feel like the Raytheon trans genders are the only motivated ones.

I understand them, they have a motivation.

The Raytheon trans genders are like, if I keep doing this, then I will be a woman.

And they at least have the motivation of like, of like defending to some identity that they

have, right? That they're very insecure about. So I understand that. I understand. The only

thing protecting my identity is liberalism. I understand that.

It's very personal. But it doesn't seem...

It doesn't seem like... I mean, is that just who we're going to be ruled by forever?

Like, okay, furry, yes, you are a dog. You are a cat

dog. Panda bear, you know, whatever. All right, DHS furry, you are definitely a man bear pig or whatever you call yourself.

Lay off, we've acknowledged you.

You've been validated.

Don't drone me.

You've been validated. Is drone me. You've been validated.

Is that what we're dealing with now?

Because I feel like it is.

Ettu is so damn right. He's spit in fire.

The only motivated ones are the ones who socially have their backs to the wall.

A return to normalcy means their social ostracization being accepted once again.

That's why the trans and homosexuals and pederas are the most ardent supporters.

Actually true. And that's both Pan-L and far right by the way. Guys, ask me if I'm

gaslighting. If you were observing the internet in the early 2010s, weren't a lot of

these deviance associated with the far right back then? Before the alt-right.

I'm talking before the alt-right.

Wasn't it always a neo-nazi thing? I never saw the transgender Soviet flag until like 2021 or 2022 for that matter.

In the early 2010s I don't think that existed.

All the tankies were still autistic guys living in Idaho wearing Ushanka hats in their

garage.

But back then in the early 2010s, I feel like it was like politically, the only thing

it was politically associated with was neo-Nazis, right?

Or am I wrong?

Yeah, there was Tumblr, but Tumblr was mainly like a woman thing or a fem cell thing, right?

Not just femcil, there cells a lot of normal women on it

there but yeah they're both nerdy groups I get that I get that I get that

but uh I don't know I don't know

I don't know.

By the way, I'll tell you about the news going on in Lebanon.

Israel bombed it. So is

Hezbollah gonna respond. I think they're gonna do a proportional response as

they see fit. I could tell you I'm not going to Lebanon this year I could tell you I'm not going to Lebanon this year. I could tell you that.

Sleeper cell, what's up? I could tell you I'm not going to Lebanon this year because it is going to be a war. And if I do go, I'll never be allowed back in the U.S. So I'm not going to go, right?

Anyway, I wish I could tell you guys some stuff. I can't tell you. Can't tell you. I can't tell you about this. But what I can tell you is that...

Joe Sizzleck, what's going on? Thank you. I love how a lot of people are like, AI, dude, I used to be like,

like a hardcore ruthless revolutionary leftist ideologically, right?

In the sense of like no moralism, no compromise, nothing like that.

And one of the dynamics I really forgot is that

pan leftists are millennial pan leftists in particular. And I'm on the cusp between millennial, it's,

I'm a zillennial, right?

But there, there's something very

reactionary about them when it comes to like everything pop culture. Like their

whole thing is always like, oh the latest movie now I watch something from the 60s.

Oh, you shop at that?

It's like this hipster shit.

How is hipsterism not reactionary, by the way?

And one of the reasons I didn't like tankies, like 10 years ago, was because I associated

with that hipsterism of like, oh, the old thing is better.

I just like this thing from the 50s.

And I'm like, well, I want to be what they were in the 50s, but for 2024.

Like, you know, there's an old dinosaur named Phil Greaves.

I don't know if you've heard of them.

He's kind of a legend.

For better or for worse.

Legendary ancient tanky, Phil Greaves.

But he's British!

And that's what, I'm not saying all British people

are the problem, but that specific type of British Marxist,

he's got a black and white photo of Lenin as his profile picture.

And all he does is like shit on any new technology and say that it's just a tool of further capitalist mind control or whatever, right?

And I got to ask him, I'm like, all right, Phil, you've got a black

and white photo of Lenin. You like black and white stuff. You like older stuff. Everything

older is better, right? And I was just asking him,, but like back then, like, was Lenin down with

shit from like, was Lenin saying that only the past is good from the 1700s? Like,

was it Lenin kind of embracing the future for his time? You know what I mean? Like what you're doing is kind of

paradoxical. Like if Lenin was alive today, he would be fully AI acceleratist. Of course he would.

I mean, look at what the Soviets were doing with... back then, the latest thing was Fordism.

The latest technological paradigm, it was Fordism. They were hanging up photos of Henry Ford in their factories.

They were trying to be at the avant-garde of the latest technologies.

And I'm just, I'm not, and I'm not saying that, you know, this is an endorsement of the

Soviet avant-garde, which used to

be like my ideology, you know, it was like a Malovich ideology, right?

I'm not saying that, although it was necessary probably, the Soviet avant-garde, to destroy

modern art.

The good thing about it was the destructive it had on, effect it had, on high modern

art, right?

Um, and I support socialist realism, but I'm just trying to say like,

even socialist realism was very futuristic during its time.

It was a type of futurism.

The socialist realist depiction of like nature and factories that was actually like what the Soviet Union was looking like and what the Soviet future was also looking like right?

I'm not a fan of like the Khrushchev era cosmism by the way

Because I think that's kind of a deviation. It's not grounded

And it also is kind of reflecting the ideology of the technical, you know,

the technical right opportunists from the Bukharan, Bukharan era that wormed their way through, associated

with Khrushchev and so on.

But if you're a Marxist, you are a futurist.

Right? I don't know why that's controversial.

And then people are like, okay, Haas, what about your setup?

Why do you have this sword here and this?

Well, I'll tell you why, all right?

Um, because Islam is the future, bitch.

Ha ha! I interpret that as you will. All right, I'm not even going to say I'm joking.

I'm going to say from in a certain way,

there is a special relationship between Islam and modernity that I think is that makes

Islam inherently a futuristic religion, future-oriented, an Islamic culture in particular, right?

People say I'm just saying this because of my own background, my own parochial background.

But keep in mind, I became an atheist for a long time and I am sufficiently alienated

from my background to like not be have this emotional

personal one-sided bias you know when I say this I mean it you know I'm not

just saying this as a bias you know Hazaldine is a universal man, which means I'm an American.

I'm literally just an American.

You understand?

I'm an American.

Um.

Yeah, I'm an American, but I'm an American, I'm here to bring, I'm here to bring Islam

to America.

But in an American way.

You know what I miss debates. I miss debates.

I miss debates. Joseph Smith already did that. Kind of true.

Debate Mr. Avvy on Israel.

Is the debate era of Infrared just done?

Because I feel like we've...

There's no one...

I remember in 2022, like I tried to debate leftists.

All they would do is come on the mic and be like,

heh ha ha, and they would meme.

Then I debated Asatar Bear.

He died.

Like he literally is not around anymore.

I don't know.

And then I debated Ben Burgess and he is gone. Who is left for me to debate?

Not any pan-leftists that are left. Yeah. Oh, it's always over about overcoming bridges, right?

But there's no bridges to overcome any longer on that side. On that side of the pond.

Or on the right wing side of the pond pond but we're still going to debate the

right wing not to build bridges but to uh... to assert dominance but you I always

remember I always forget the fact and this is the set, Richard Hanania, I would love to

debate that guy.

I would love debating that little freak, a little freaky, freaky guy.

He's the one, he's the worst, worst poster child for futurism. Richard

Hanania and the Silicon Valley creepy freaks and the E.A.C. crowd are what's turning the

people against AI. We need to have a people's AI

because that Richard Hanania reptilian lizard looking motherfucker

and these Silicon Valley creeploid

E.A.A. people who are just like, like robots pretty much.

Not the vibe. Definitely not the vibe. But, I'll be down to debate that guy.

You've all Noah Hariri.

It's another one of these robots who just like, you know, you call them formal.

This is a difference. Infrared is futuristic, but we're not. who just like, you know, you call them formal.

This is a difference. Infrared is futuristic, but we're not formalists.

We're not like these propositional logic lords who are Philistines.

We actually are spiritual. We're actually exploring the spiritual dimension of AI.

When you think about it, and it's like sum up infrared in one sentence,

like historically. And isn't it kind of like infrared is exploring the spiritual dimension of AI.

Doesn't that sum it all up in such a simple way?

We are exploring the spiritual dimension of AI.

That's what it is.

Infrared is spirituality in the age of AI.

Because like you can interpret spirit as like, you know, the kind of,

the whole, the whole world view of Marxism-Leninism as a specific, meaningful

kind of ideology, it's not an ideology, but you get the idea, the total integration of history. That's spiritual in nature, right? Our appreciation for the

civilizations of mankind and the history of mankind and religions and so on and so on.

We're not coming at it from like the Trad Larper perspective. We're coming at it from like

the AI perspective. We are reintroducing the spiritual dimension to AI,

reintroducing culture to AI.

Ah, Jeezek would never debate me.

And I have nothing to debate Michael Hudson about

because he's actually right. I don't know if you guys know that, but I actually endorse Michael Hudson's view of things,

you know. Richard Wolf...

You know what? What has Richard Wolf?

You know what? What is is what has Richard Wolf contributed I'm Richard

Wolf and I'm going to tell you about you need to understand that when we have

cooperatives that's the way to overcome capitalism.

And I'm like, damn. So what has he contributed? I don't hate him.

I'm just saying like what's the big, what's the big deal with Richard Wolf?

I know he's kind of introducing people to Marxism, right?

But he doesn't hold a candle to Michael Hudson.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Michael Hudson is in a whole different league, okay?

Michael Hudson, I'm reading him now for my book, okay? That's how important he is.

Hudson is a genius.

Mark Fisher.

I don't agree with him about anything but I don't want to I don't insult Mark Fisher

because he's not alive and I'm not this type of person to insult the dead.

He's never, I've never seen him or heard of him doing anything

evil or anti-human so I'm not gonna denigrate him

and insult him because he's actually dead and you know I do have to be somewhat respectful

and have limits and not just insult people who aren't even around to defend themselves.

Bring Rezza on. I don't think he would approve of any of this, to honest but that's okay I don't I don't take it personally

but um I'm actually kind of scared to he if I knew like what he thought of this whole thing

probably not a very good opinion of it at all,

but that's okay, I don't take it personally.

Anyway,

but everyone, everyone should read Intelligence and Spirit

because that actually is about AI. You should read it. It's

a good book. See, there's some people, like, for example, Nim Nicholas Tollett.

You seem to share views about the progression of history.

How are we basically recycling things with the past and the present, and this time is not progressing?

Huh?

What are you talking about?

You gotta clarify.

What I was trying to say is

the Patreon Q&A.

All right, I'm going to check it, and if there's, uh, if there's actual like enough people,

we're long overdue on that, holy shit.

We are long overdue on the Patreon Q&A.

There's only 22 questions but you know what we're gonna I'm gonna do it.

Anyway the last thing I was going to say before we get into the patron Q&A.

Carlos from Midwestern Marx. I did talk to him. I talked to him the other day and I think

he's brilliant and I want to talk to him more.

Now as far as when you guys are going to see a discussion with us, that is going to be

in the works.

But I'm at, we're, you know, Carlos is very, very brilliant.

I'm very impressed by him.

And, you know, we should have, we should have had this talk earlier, like, years earlier.

We should have collabbed way earlier and got to know

each other way earlier because it's pretty much like, what is it called, when there's a

species that's evolving, what is it called again?

You know how like crabs constantly keep getting invented by nature, but from completely different

species?

What is that called?

There's a word for it.

What's it called? There's a word for it.

What's it called?

Nobody knows the word.

Convergent evolution.

That's like infrared in Midwestern marks.

There's a lot of convergent evolutionary characteristics.

Like we didn't know each other, but we were coming from very similar backgrounds

and dealing with the same questions. Anyway, let me start the Patreon Q&A.

Hello guys it's the Patreon Q&A. Blackpag what's going on man when America is

industrialized how do we avoid the famine

typically associated with this transition? Very good question. We were still integrated

with the world market. We weren't isolated from it like the Soviets and the Chinese were.

And what that also means is that we had a lot of

capital investment from foreign capitalists. That's pretty much the TLDR.

Mira, what's going on?

Can you talk a little about your relationship with God?

You know, I don't feel like I can.

Because how would I know?

Like my relationship with God, I don't know what God has in store for me or what he thinks of me.

Um, you know, when we talk about a relationship with God, maybe you're saying my relationship

with the thought of God or the idea of God or the feeling of God. And I like to keep it private. You know, I don't, there's something about talking

about it in public, off the top of your head, unprompted, without a specific emotional context that I think is inauthentic.

I'm not saying it's completely a private matter. I'm just saying like,

it's not a rationalistic thing where you're just like certain in the sense of rational conscious certainty.

It's more of an intuitive certainty, you know?

Americans invented techno, interesting name.

Thanks for being a patron.

What in your view is the role of music and the revolution?

What is communist music?

Any artist recommendations?

I've thought about that's not cringe.

So like when there's like a football game and everyone's like,

nah, no, no, hey, hey, it's probably going to be like shit like that, you know, like,

that's like, like, that's like, like, that's probably going to be like shit like that, you know, like that's like like that's probably how it would look like, like a communist army or like communist masses at a rally singing probably will be like that.

As far as music composed for communist reasons

it's interesting because hip hop I think, I'm not a fan of conscious rap or conscious

hip hop.

So probably we would just take like folk, you know that Trump train song?

Trump's on a roll and it's gonna get better.

Probably just like drawing from American folk songs. And it'll be for all ages, you know, that kind of thing. I don't know.

But it's interesting, the EFF does make their own music. That's really interesting.

But also music has a different significance in South Africa than it does here.

Okay, death metal is absolutely not going to have anything to do with the revolution,

all right? It's just not going to happen.

Winged Hussar, what's going on?

Like, no, conscious rap is like, you gotta understand that you gotta be awake,

because you're not thinking about the system, and got them in the wake.

And then you gotta realize how they're getting us and we got to come together ban another

must put a and it's like damn dude you chill

There's something about that that just doesn't hit the same way

It's like a song.that's like I flush a bitch down the toilet I close the lid. I don't know like this I just made that up. There's something about that that

don't hit the same is like I push my grandma down that up. There's something about that that don't hit the same is like I

push my grandma down the stairs because she's trying to get in my way I'm a

true thug walking out the you know what I mean like I don't know.

Something about that don't hit the same is like, you know, at the gross, you know, like

every, every time there's bars, it's always like some shit that hits, but like, honestly,Spice, when she's like, you think of this shit, you ain't even

the fart.

It's like, I never thought of it that way.

You know what I mean? When T. Grizzly is like Wendy's chicken sandwich over

fucking Popeyes. I'm like, you know what? There's something to that. But like

conscious rap you can't do that, you know? You just can't there's no way to do it like consciously

It's got to be like oh shit, I didn't even think of that you know

But when someone is like that the problem with conscious rap is the whole lyrics are you ain't never thought of this because you are asleep. You didn't

get your education. It's like, damn, okay, you're punishing me. T. Grizzly's not punishing

me. He's actually like, he's evoking thoughts and feelings I, you know, I ain't, I never paid attention to before.

Like how Wendy's chicken sandwich is better than Popeyes, you know?

Uh, Kanye?

Yeah, it's a... I don't know.

I don't know.

Um...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean it's there.

But I don't know, is that rap?

Winged Hussar, what's going on?

And what way are cities exploiting the countryside today and how do socialism address this? The first way is debt. It's always how it's been debt since ancient

times. So debt, that's the first way. The second way is probably extracting resources from there. You know, the core periphery

dynamic. It's usually something that goes on. Another way is backward forms of

productive relations, forming a bedrock and a premise of urban accumulation. That's another way. For example, like the

the backward methods of production and primitive outdated methods of

production in the countryside form a foundational basis for the revenues generated in the urban core.

The best example of this is fossil fuels and oil, by the way.

You know, cities, all their revenues comes from oil, right right where is that produced who who's digging it out

You know is so yeah, that's just a very rough rough rough

Same thing with coal

Avant what's going on? What does the Iranian revolution mean for Marxism or what does Marxism clarify about the Iranian revolution?

Hmm, interesting.

The Iranian revolution means for Marxism. Hmm, interesting.

The Iranian Revolution means for Marxism that something that is very confusing to explain.

But it means for Marxism that, Marxism, I don't want to say

this in a way that sounds pretentious. Let me, how do I simplify this?

It means for Marxism that the premise from which we begin, which is a mode of production defined by a totality of social relationships has a degree of particularity and specificity,

which itself is an object of consciousness, politics, and history for a given people.

It's not just you have different classes, you have different relationships to the totality

from which different classes refer, and the specificity of that relationship, when taken to its conclusion, when understood consciously, is itself something

revolutionary. Islam is revolutionary in that context itself. Inclusive of all the classes that are encompassed recognizing the, it's more complicated than just this kind of

dugan like acknowledgement and recognition of the specificity of civilization but

nonetheless why is this kind of receptivity to the particular

why is that revolutionary in and of itself

because it basically it's a specific form of communism

it's it's the content of the communism in the first place. Communism by itself is just an empty form.

What is the communism? You know? What is that actually?

And... and with this kind of revival of revolutionary Islam There's a specific awakening to the determinate nature just one revolutionary event that

mobs and masses of people are getting caught up in and participating in, in the Iranian

Revolution, you don't just have a responsivity to some new event, to some new kind of thing being

thrusted upon you that demands an exact and direct response.

You have, event, yes, but which imposes a

particular relationship upon those receiving its calling and those who are receptive to it.

One that encompasses the extent of how, of their lifestyles, of how they make sense of their particularity,

the meticulous particularity of their way of life.

It's not just one sudden rush of passion of history.

It's...

History, recursively referring to itself.

And this recursivity itself becoming an event that people recognize and are compelled by and are awakened to. It's really about that awakening, you know?

That's the whole key to the whole thing.

What was Marxism previously asleep?

What was it sleeping on before? That now in Iran there was an awakening with regard to. That's the real question. I mean that's really

it. Word salad and what's going on? For you, how do right wingers compare to the community

of children you describe Western internet leftists

I guess they're the bad kids who like are

Tearing apart flies with tweezers and torturing cats and shit

But I think it's very similar. But yeah, very similar. What is a comrade? I guess it's someone with whom you're engaged in a struggle alongside with in a militant manner,

you know, a comrade in arms, it's always in arms.

Even if not literally an armed struggle, it's like...

You're united with them by a common struggle.

I think it's simple, right?

Winged.

Once again, do you think Nietzsche is liberal metaphysics into its full logical

inclusion? I don't know what you mean by liberal metaphysics, not necessarily. Much of Nietzsche is between liberalism and the rotted, necrotic, ancient regime.

What is the philosophical connection and continuity between nihilism and Hitler?

There is none. Hitler is not a philosopher.

So there's a relationship between the development of neolism within philosophy and perhaps the development of neholism in political reality,

but I think it's nebulous to draw a direct connection between philosophy and reality, as if there's some kind of causal relationship or as if reality is downstream from philosophy.

There's a civilizational nihilism, perhaps, civilizational contradiction, which both

philosophy, politics, and so on are responding to in their own ways.

And there's a parallel, I think, of course, between Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and fascism.

But... And there's some direct intellectual connection there, of course, but I don't think...

I don't think it's very direct. From a psychological perspective, what do you think about the claim that boob guys have unresolved mom issues?

I...

I mean, is that really what we're going to ask now?

Do I have to answer that?

You know, like, why do I have to answer this?

Because you're, I mean, I have to answer this?

Because you're, I mean, I mean, you're paying for the Patreon.

Uh, I don't think that's fair. I mean, I don't know. I don't know.

I don't, I don't think that's, I think it's healthy to, you know, but that to the detriment,

to the complete detriment of the other half, I think maybe that's just a lack of taste.

I don't know if it's mom issues, I just think it's a lack of taste, you know?

You know, you need both.

You need both. I mean, you don't need both actually. You just need one.

And the other is optional, right?

Like, you need ice spice.

The rest is option. It's welcome. It's a great addition, but it's not, it's not really decisive you know but one is decisive and the other is not.

That's the true. I don't know what it is. Why are some people one way or why are some people like Haas? I don't know.

But Haas is an ice spice.

You know.

I think the idea of Kim K is great, like the idea of it, she's got both.

Like the idea is great.

It's just that the reality ain't what it's talked up to be.

But the idea is a great, it's like a great idea, you know?

Anyway, if imperialism was a system in which imperial powers competed for the division of the world, American Uniparilarity is post-imperial,

why do we still call US Imperioles because it inherits the imperialist system?

It's the culmination of it.

What will it mean for Maga communism if Maga be, this is all the same guy by the way,

Maga becomes captured by the establishment.

We have to start a new movement.

No, we're going to just have continuity. We're never erasing our past or our history.

We're just going to respond to it accordingly. We will be the

true successors to the flame. Period. What do you mean wrestle MAGA back? We're

going to win the blue-collar working class no matter if they're a MAGA or. We're going to win the blue collar working class. No matter if they're a MAGA or

something else.

Avant, when people...

What's up, Vaughn?

Thanks for being a patron.

People in 21st century use so many different terms. How can communists clarify the reality without defaulting to dogmatism?

Just follow the money, right? Do a materialist analysis and literally like, okay, what is funding this hegemonic

power what's keeping it going benign can you talk about your thoughts on

Carthage where they fishermen good question thanks for me and a patron by the

way good good question I don't know if Thanks for me and a patron by the way.

Good question.

I don't know if they were fishermen.

It kind of seems like they were half fishermen, half farmers.

Maybe the fishermen aspect is what led them to ruin.

Orvo, what's going on? Can you respond to to ruin. Orvo!

What's going on?

Can you respond to the claim that Soviet soldiers raped German women?

Is it true, if not?

Where do these claims come from?

I don't think it happened on a scale larger than with the other allies.

So I'll say that.

I think it's very exaggerated.

Yeah.

I think it's extremely exaggerated in a racist way to depict, you know, Soviets as a wild intermention.

I mean, it happens in war, but it's not justifiable at all.

They shot. When people were caught, they'd get shot for doing that. But, um,

I don't, I don't think it, it's, I think it's over exaggerated, yes.

Word salident is your current understanding of dialectics represented in the Yin-Yang

say, well, no. If if not how would you say your

understanding differs because the in yang symbol is just one form

dialectics is about a dialectic of content and form no one form can be the privileged receptacle of or

representation of that. Talent site, thank you so much for being a patron.

When it comes to industrial workers in the U.S., there are two groups, highly skilled, low

skilled, maybe a third.

What would it mean to reach out to the former group?

Or are they not a priority?

We should be looking to form our base of support.

I actually think we should probably just read what American communists like his fosters had to say about the

matter before and and study that and and see if that still applies or maybe

the logic but just still the logic behind it but be honest, I don't know who we should start with.

Because you need a core and then you need to have a mass base, but

I don't have enough experience. Orville, how would you respond to American Christian who's skeptical of communism because

of the USSR cracked down to Christianity in the early period of the Soviet Union?

I would say that...

I would say that Soviet communism was an educational experience and that it's very possible to acknowledge mistakes were made that were learned from later on and we can now learn from now which

don't which it would be unfair to say that those mistakes amount to the essence

of the whole phenomenon. Rome also persecuted Christians and then Rome became Christian.

Talonside, can you speak on the importance of democratic struggle for Lenin in the form of it today?

I think Stalin outlined it in his last speech.

For Lenin, the importance of the democratic struggle was creating the proper context with

which to wage the proletarian class struggle without the fetters of feudalism.

Because uh, proletarian. without the fetters of feudalism.

Because proletarian class struggle presupposes the victory of democracy.

Anyway, Stalin rightly regarded the democratic struggle to be the defense of our basic constitutional

and civil rights against the tide of this imperialist state machine which wants to violate

it and throw out our rights out the window. Our classical liberal rights. So we should defend those.

Well, thank you so much for reading a patron. In earlier stream, you talked about Eurocentrism

of Lenin, how that affected his decision making. How does that differ from Stalin and and Mao, who and what lessons can we take from that distinction?

Stalin had an acutely better grasp of the national reality and the view that, the view that, a deep respect for history and the totality of history. He couldn't have the one-sided Eurocentric

view because he had to take into account the inclusivity of Russia within that

European history.

But Mao altogether is going beyond the frame of reference of the story of Europe.

And Mao is rediscovering Marxism in many ways, totally from scratch, unattached

to the vestiges of European social democracy, whereas Lenin and Stalin were still struggling

with that.

I think that's the difference. Americans when it said

what role is okay we already asked that. How does financialization lead to

de-industrialization?

Um, well it has, objectively, let's just be clear about that.

But how that happened is more or less the rise of financial monopolies, which are premised on the basis of the accumulations of

profit, pure profit, which is obviously indiscriminate toward the means of

acquiring that profit, regard the real material premises of production as costs, costs

getting in the way of the realization of monopoly or rent-your-profits.

So they just have to eliminate the costs.

Even if this is devastating the very premises of civilization.

Benign, how do you relate to the geopolitical division of land-based versus

sea-based to the political economic division

between Whig and Tory. It depends on the time period. Sometimes Whigs represented

the people and sometimes Tories did. It was never exclusively one or the other.

In this specifically I'm never exclusively one or the other.

And specifically I'm talking about the 1700s.

Between the Mercatile Bank of England types of the Glorious Revolution and folks like

James Harrington or William Petty who emphasized land being a source of value.

Again, they flip-flopped a lot.

Flip-flopped around historically. That's my understanding.

I'm not familiar with James Harrington or William Petty's views at all. I'm going to refresh it once.

Okay, we have some questions.

Word Saladin, regarding Engels dialectics of nature. What do you think Angles would say

about the new developments of natural science? He probably would have had a lot to say about

modern physics and dialectics.

Violet, thoughts on Kotsky. The Kotsky lobby in IJG is growing. It's going to be purged and stamped out.

Is German imperialism based? Thoughts on Bismarck? It's going to be purged and stamped out.

Is German imperialism based?

Thoughts on Bismarck?

It's not.

Bismarck is not...

Bismarck is...

Yeah, is that, is that Lenin's imperialism? Not sure Lenin thought Bismarck I'm sorry

Marks and Engels thought Bismarck was progressive because he was unifying the

German nation state. There's nuance to it you know but that is roughly

corresponding to the rise of imperialism.

So it's not that it's based, he's based, you have to properly understand its historical significance.

Not be one-sided.

Close Society, what do you think is the great American novel?

The, I don't know, I can't tell you that.

Some of them, Call of the Wild, love it.

I love Mark Twain as well.

The Iron Heel is Jack London in general, you know.

It's constantly motivated what's going on.

Grapes of Wrath by Steinbeck. It's really important.

You know?

Depression era.

Proletarian literature.

Last question, if I made a woman's caucus, I didn't, but if I did, would you

sanction and support this? I promise to keep them in line, no Gaga 2. I mean, I mean, yeah,

I mean, there's no rule against it, but it's like, is it really like, I don't know, I'm not even going to question it.

Like, like, does just, do women not also have beef? Like, just being a woman is what unites you?

I mean, I don't know, if that's, if that makes sense to you, go ahead.

Not gonna stop it.

Anyway, anyway.

All right guys, we ended that. It was only 30 minutes. Okay.

Are you fucking kidding?

Patreon can only handle 200 megabytes. Yeah, that's fucking great.

I mean, try to edit this.

Uh, okay, let me see.

Jesus, what can I do to like, fucking trim this down

Trim Hello? Hello? Hello? HZAR Hello.

Hello.

Society.

You have to properly understand its historical significance.

You have to properly understand its historical significance.

Not be one-sided.

Close Society, what do you think is the great American novel?

The, I don't know.

I can't tell you that.

Some of them, Call of the Wild, love it.

Okay, I don't know how I'm gonna upload this to the Patreon.

I'll deal with that later. I have to like convert it.

Shit!

That is such bad fucking luck that is starting to do this.

Why are they so cheap? They're so cheap. Patreon. They're like, yeah, it's too big.

What?

Oh, it worked. It did work.

All right. It's uploading.

Anyway, I'll see you guys around.

I don't know exactly when I'm going to see you next.

But I'll see you soon.

Maybe tomorrow.

I could be streaming tomorrow. It's possible

I'll let you guys know. Okay. Bye-bye

See you guys star side