🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

Welcome, everybody, for another day of covering the war in Palestine.

We have a lot of things to talk about, but apparently, there's some breaking news.

Well, it's breaking as far as I'm concerned, because I haven't seen it up to this point.

Apparently, and I shit you not, Trump is getting canceled for praising Hezbollah.

Now, I'm not gonna get too excited.

He still does brag about the killing of Soleimani after all.

But I think this is a great development discursively because it makes MAGA go on the defensive and maybe start questioning whether Israel is our greatest ally or not.

So I think that's a great thing, regardless of Trump's intentions.

And we're going to have to watch that clip.

And see what's going on, because DeSantis is accusing him of praising Hezbollah.

Another thing, we're gonna be going on Mario Nafal Space.

So we have that to look forward to.

Now here is Ron DeSantis complaining about Trump.

I'm just going to show it to you right off the bat.

I do want to get into the uh lecture or whatever, the philosophy of the conflict, talk about that.

But before I do that, I want to uh go ahead and show this to you.

So this is all I see for for now.

Terrorists have murdered at least twelve hundred Israelis and twenty two Americans and are holding more hostage.

So it is absurd that anyone, much less someone running for President, would choose now to attack our friend and ally, Israel.

Much less praise Hezbollah terrorists as very smart.

As President, I will stand with Israel and treat terrorists like the scum that they are.

Okay, so what did Trump say?

Because it sounds really based.

What did he say?

Let's see.

And then two nights ago, I read all of Biden's security people.

Can you imagine?

National defense people.

And they said, gee, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack from the north because that's the most vulnerable spot.

I said, wait a minute.

You know, Hezbollah is very smart.

They're all very smart.

The press doesn't like when they say him.

You know, I said that President Xi of China, 1.4 billion people, he controls it with an iron fist.

I said, he's a very smart man.

They killed me the next day.

I said he was smart.

Whatever am I going to say?

But Hezbollah, they're very smart.

And they have a national defense minister or somebody saying, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack us from the North.

So the following morning they attacked.

They might not have been doing it, but if you listen to this jerk, you would attack from the North because he said that's our weak spot.

About 15 seconds later, it was all over, and we did it.

But I'll never forget.

I'll never forget that BB, Netanyahu let us down.

That was a very terrible thing.

I will say that.

And so when I see sometimes the intelligence, you talk about the intelligence or you talk about some of the things that went wrong over the last week.

They've got to straighten it out because they're fighting potentially a very big force.

They're fighting potentially Iran.

And when they have people saying the wrong things, everything they say is being digested by these people because they're vicious and they're smart.

And boy, are they vicious, because nobody's ever seen the kind of sight that we've seen.

Nobody's ever seen it.

But they cannot play games.

So we were disappointed by that, very disappointed, but we did the job ourselves and it was absolute precision, magnificent, beautiful job.

And then

Bibi tried to take credit for it.

So he's talking about the killing of Solomoni here.

That didn't make me feel too good, but that's alright.

So yeah, um this is well, first of all, it's clear this is not Trump's intention.

He is not praising Hezbollah, he's still super Zionist, but he's doing the thing where he's saying, you know, the enemy is smart and you guys are ma Well, it it doesn't really matter what his intention is at all, because in a sense, DeSantis is right in the strict sense that Trump is criticizing Israel.

It doesn't matter what his intentions are, what the reason is, he is criticizing Israel at this point.

Expressing that he has independence from the Israeli political establishment and the

Israel Israel lobby effectively, it seems like.

And it seems at this point that Trump's Zionism is in free fall.

If Trump truly is a Zionist right now, but in a way that's independent of the Israel lobby, that means he can be like this.

He can turn on them like this.

You understand?

So, um.

Also, it doesn't matter what his intentions are, because guess what's gonna happen?

If Trump is gonna be attacked by DeSantis and DeSantis wants to draw the red line that it's about Zionism, I guarantee you in the MAGA grassroots, there's gonna be some QAnon people or something else who are basically gonna just say, you know what?

Let's start being critical of Israel because DeSantis is with Israel.

The whole media is with Israel.

They're attacking Trump for this.

You get what I'm saying?

There's a possibility there.

I'm not saying this is going to happen.

I'm just saying.

It's a possibility.

So this is a way for MAGA to be

to lose and ditch the Zionism.

Um

So, yeah, I hope.

I'm not holding my breath.

But.

It's relevant to what I want to talk about today, about internal uh responses to um to Israel and the United States, how this is a partisan divide between apparently left and right, although that seems to be changing in in many ways.

And I want to talk about things like this.

Because I think a big mistake is being made in terms of how people have a cognitive mapping of this conflict and how they understand this conflict.

There's also more things that Trump said, which I'd like to uh

I'd like to get into.

Before we get on the Mario novel Space,

Iron Fist.

I said he's a very smart man.

They killed me the next day.

I killed all of Biden's security people.

Can you imagine?

Okay, this is just DeSantis.

Can you imagine national defense?

So there's not much more from that clip besides that.

Trump claims that he does claim that during the operation to kill Netanyahu, Israel backed out at the last moment and they went ahead with it anyway.

Trump still wants to take credit for it.

We obviously know this was John Bolton and the neocons.

But Trump is Trump.

He's but he's free he's free falling right now, and that's a good thing for us.

He's free falling.

That means

Um MAGA can be more influenced.

If there's still MAGA.

You know, that's the thing.

Jay Summit, let's go!

Holy shit!

Let's go!

You guys know, Jay Summit works very closely with Ibrahim on our glorious, beautiful second channel on the YouTube.

A lot of those bangers you're seeing, that's also Jay Summit's work.

So uh keep that in mind, all right.

Uh guy's very good at what he does.

And that second channel is going to blow up.

Okay, mark my words.

It's going to blow up.

One viral thing is all it's going to take.

Thank you, Ark.

Let's go.

Let's go.

Let's go.

I hope Mario Knoffal doesn't end his space, 'cause there's some things I want to get to and cover.

So we're at the I don't know, I'm losing track of time, third or fourth day of the conflict.

Hezbollah has not uh gotten into the conflict yet.

The main thing that we're witnessing right now is the atrocity propaganda.

Which

I'm a little conflicted as far as how I should be paying attention to it because my gut instinct is just like, this is bullshit.

I'm not even gonna pay it any bother because in a year or in a few months, everyone's gonna realize it was bullshit, right?

I could sit here and be like, oh my God, I can't believe.

I mean, even people in my life are telling me, how are you not outraged that they're just lying this much?

And I I think I've adopted a very kind of like Buddhist or I don't know what you'd call it a very Eastern or Oriental mentality where I'm just kind of like indifferent to the injustice of the lie because it was the single thing that raised my blood pressure for the Russia-Ukraine conflict for an entire year.

So I've been so desensitized by it.

That I just like to focus on

The Tao, you know, I like to focus on the way of things.

As in, I know this is bullshit, but the bullshit will clear on its own, just like a river flows.

And I don't have to pay it anymore.

I already see the end of the tunnel here.

It's a bunch of bullshit.

It'll get cleared up.

Don't worry.

The truth will be revealed in due time.

And when I say due time, I mean a matter of it's already getting revealed, right?

I mean,

Uh, yeah, and it's nothing new.

It's nothing new.

I'm really used to it, like growing up in my life.

I've I used to hear all sorts of crazy things, and I think the main thing stems from the dehumanization you're seeing of Hamas.

Uh, confusing Hamas for ISIS, confusing them for there's nothing wrong with the Taliban, but confusing them for the Taliban, it's just ignorance, right?

Uh, the assumption that Hamas are like these savage pre-modern beasts who are uncivilized and not privy to modern technology or modern culture.

And they are just like acting completely barbarically, like something you'd see straight out of a movie.

I think that's where most of this is coming from.

Like for example, I constantly see people say like oh these pink haired western leftists who are supporting Palestine, Hamas would behead them.

And it's like

In spirit, yes, but literally would Hamas behead them?

No.

Hamas would tell them Hamas would say, Okay, you're a foreigner.

Your ways are strange and I don't understand them.

But if you are in my land, you have to cover up.

Here's a sweater.

Here's a dress.

Put it on.

And we don't tolerate any public displays of obscenity or that's that's what they that is honestly what their response would be.

It would not be killing or, you know.

I don't people people have a really stupid idea of how

I mean, if especially Hezbollah, I mean, if you know how modern Lebanon is, and if you think Hez Hezbollah is going around enforcing like some crazy strict uh enforcing religious codes so strictly no, it's culture, it's organic culture.

And yeah, their culture is different than ours, but

The idea that they're just kind of like irrational.

I mean, I grew up.

Hearing that Hezbollah was the same as Al-Qaeda and Hamas are the same as Al-Qaeda, and that every it's all terrorism and every kind of terrorism is the same.

And you know, I'm used to the lies, is what I'm trying to say.

You know, I'm used to this.

Kind of looking at the some bearded guy speaking a different language, a very angry and passionate, and then just people being like, Oh yeah, that's just uh that's just, you know, that guy just wants to kill all of us.

Uh it's not true.

Hamas doesn't want to kill uh everyone living in Israel.

They don't want to kill most people living in Israel.

They don't want to kill civilians living in Israel.

Um.

They don't really want to kill in general, but they are what they do want is to fulfill um goals, right?

They want to achieve the liberation of Palestine and the overthrow of

The Israeli state.

To that ends.

Um

Whether you agree with that or not is immaterial.

They're not, but you can't just say they're beasts and savages who just want to murder everyone.

If that was true, that story I told you yesterday of that settler woman, and not saying settler as a loaded term, like a literal settler, right?

She was on camera saying, Yeah, they came into my house.

They said they weren't going to harm anyone.

They didn't.

They were very polite.

They asked for a banana.

And I said yes, they asked permission.

It's like and then they left.

They didn't harm anyone.

I can't confirm the claims of that they're executing civilians.

I don't know where it's coming from.

I could be wrong, right?

But it would it just would surprise me a lot.

It would surprise me a lot if Hamas

Just started taking civilians and shooting them straight up.

For no reason.

Uh massacring them.

That would shock me, you know.

But I haven't seen any evidence of it.

For example, when they claim.

Um, oh, they're killing all these people.

Where is the evidence, you know?

I haven't seen any.

I haven't seen any.

Um, so yeah, I think a lot of people get confused.

But the lies that are going around, I mean, look, here's a development that's pretty fucking crazy actually.

This is pretty crazy.

This is an example, right?

And then, oh god, I have to talk about the philosophy stuff because this stupid ass land back nonsense is coming back.

Can I have to address it?

Okay, so Biden issued a crazy statement.

Okay.

He um this is fucking like

Holy shit, this is if you don't believe the internet has taken over all reality, thank you, what is gay?

What is what is your what is his name?

Or GoIP.

Okay.

Yeah, see I don't

Choose goipe.

I can't believe I'm like roasting someone.

Who just ga subscribe.

Thank you so much, dude.

Appreciate it.

Um, this is just how I am, I guess.

I'm just a mean, mean guy.

Thank you, Anonymous.

Hammers is the most democratic military in the Middle East.

Thank you for the five.

Appreciate you.

Uh, let's.

By the way, Hamas, anyone who talks about Hamas is just wasting your time.

If it was, if there wasn't Hamas, it would be someone else, okay?

They clear all Hamas are the ones who want to fight, fight, fight.

Well, yeah, that that's what the Gaza people want.

So yeah, that's what they want.

They want to fight.

Whoever's going to be the best at fighting, they're going to choose.

I never ever really thought that I would see and c have confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children.

I never thought I'd ever anyway.

I uh Didn't the people that the US and Israel funded in Syria do that, by the way?

But there are.

Countries in the region are trying to be of some help, including Arab nations.

Jordan.

Jordan.

I don't mean to be like straight up racist here, but the king of Jordan, is he Arab?

Is the king of Jordan Arab?

I mean Jordan.

What is Jordan doing?

Okay.

If you know, you know.

But what the fuck is Jordan doing?

Wait, I can't even say this shit.

Holy fuck.

Three oh god.

Okay.

Well, actually, ah.

Can I say this?

Um

Like, I don't know.

I don't want to get banned from Jordan.

But at this rate, I'll probably be banned from Jordan anyway.

Fuck it, I'm saying it.

Jordan, what are you guys doing with that king you have?

That guy is.

That guy's a white boy.

I said it.

I said it.

The king of Jordan is a white boy.

The king of Jordan is a white boy.

There you go.

I said it.

Dude's a white boy.

Straight up.

Nothing else.

All right.

Ah literally, his mom is like British.

He's like intermarried with the British royal family.

I'm not even fucking kidding.

His mom is British.

He's literally a white boy.

The King of Jordan.

Dude's a white boy.

Literally just some British guy who's king of Jordan.

All right, yeah.

Straight up, white boy.

Trying to be of some help.

So, uh

Anyway.

Yeah, he's Oxford educated and I heard his speech the other day, which is what made me real because his Arabic accent is horrible.

Now listen, I don't speak fluent Arabic.

But what what what I do know in Arabic, I'm pretty sure sounds right.

And I even have like a kind of an accent in my normal English voice, right?

But the king of Jordan, when I heard him speak Arabic, dude straight up sounded like a fucking interpreter.

Like, dude, that dude is not an Arab.

I'm sorry, he's not.

He didn't.

His Arabic doesn't even sound right.

Doesn't even sound organic or nothing.

Listen to it if you don't believe me.

I never really thought that I would.

Hakeem's dad.

Oh, that's good.

I love that.

Alright, so Biden claims that he's confirmed photos of babies being beheaded by terrorists, but the White House had to issue a statement which said.

That this was not confirmed.

Clarified that US officials and the President have not seen pictures or confirmed such reports independently.

It's just coming from Netanyahu's spokesman and media reports from Israel.

If you're curious, again, Max Blumenthal talked about it yesterday.

We covered it yesterday.

Well, I'll just very briefly.

Very briefly, just kind of refresh your

Memory, right, the gray zone kind of was fully on this.

The source of the claim that they were beheading babies or killing babies was a guy named David Bed Zion, who is an extremist who incited violent riots by calling to wipe out Palestinians early this year.

And we can actually l like briefly look at the article.

Um

Oh my god.

Okay, this is a Facebook post.

Alright.

Thank God I'm not going on Facebook.

Uh we walk door after door, we killed a lot of the tourists.

We are stronger than them, they are aggressive, they are very bad, they cut head of children, cut head of women.

So this is him.

This is just this guy lying straight up.

No ambiguity, straight up just lying.

Let me see if I can show this to you.

Trust it.

This is where it comes from uh we walk door after door, we kill a lot of the terrorists, we are stronger than them, they are aggressive, they are very bad, they cut ahead of children, cut head of women, but we are stronger than them.

He straight up said they are very bad, they cut off head of children.

He straight up said that, without even laughing.

So he's leader of something called the uh apocalyptic temple movement, the temple movement.

These are people who want to demolish the Alexa Mosque and rebuild the temple, you know.

So, yeah, this would be like a crazy guy in the US who leads like a crazy church saying nonsense and people taking at face value without even questioning.

Without even questioning like the possibility that could it could be wrong, you know, it could be bullshit.

Right, so yeah, that's that's what we're dealing with there.

That's the beheading story.

And what I'm trying to say is it's fucking crazy because, okay, they ended the space.

Fuck.

They ended the space.

That's okay.

That'll just give me more room to talk about the thing I want to talk about today.

But, um, no, no, no, the the insane thing is that the tr the fucking president of the US is repeating this nonsense lie.

I get it.

The lie is really bad.

It's taking a hold of the whole country.

I'm sure your neighbors, your coworkers, your family members are talking to you about this crazy story.

And you know, justice doesn't always come you know the thing I always learn, justice is never immediate.

Sometimes you have to wait.

And sometimes a just position is just telling people, Hey, wait and see.

Let's let time tell.

I don't believe this, but don't take my word for it.

I'm sure you even you will see this was a lie in a few months or or a year.

But time will tell if that was true.

We don't know.

Say that to people, right?

Say, but that can't justify us going to war.

That doesn't justify going to war.

See?

That's all you have to say.

Okay.

So Hezbollah issued a statement recently regarding the aircraft carrier.

Yeah Mario Nawfo's space is over.

Shit!

They said sending aircraft carriers to the region with the aim of raising enemy morale reveals the weakness of the Zionist military machine.

Wasn't that your first thought?

Because that was my first thought.

If you need aircraft carriers, the odds are sorry, if you need the US to send an aircraft carrier, odds are you're desperate.

And this is not going to be good for you.

Like that to me was very, very clear.

Uh an obvious

The fact the U.S.

has to do this means Israel is very vulnerable.

So, what we're talking about.

Am I crazy for for thinking this?

If this war is taken to its full conclusion, this will be the end of Israel.

Is will it be the killing of every Israeli?

No.

No.

Will it be the forcible removal of every Israeli?

No.

I don't think that's going to happen either.

But will it be the d the the end of the state of Israel?

Yes.

And also it's gonna be a huge fucking uh it's gonna be a a revolution in the region.

A complete reshaping of the borders of the Middle East.

And you know what?

If this conflict is staying to its full conclusion,

It's going to be a region wide conflict going beyond this will be the trigger of it.

But this will go beyond Israel.

This will be all this will be a wars you're going to see that no one even expects to happen, right?

Because the Middle East region is a ticking time bomb.

I'm sure you understand Sykes-Picot, the boundaries and borders that were drawn.

It's like China's warlord period, pretty much.

The nation-states of the Middle East are all artificial, in a sense.

All of them are.

I mean, because I try to, I'm thinking about this myself as someone of Lebanese descent.

And I ask myself the question: why is someone who's Lebanese, when I was growing, why was the Palestine thing so fundamental to my understanding of the world?

Like, why does that hit so close to home?

And then I the same thing with the Yemenis, and they're all the way, they're not even the Levant.

And then I look at other Muslims from Pakistan, I look at Kurds, Pakistanis, Iranians.

Hell, even Indonesians.

Everybody's got the sa sim somewhat of the same thing going.

Maybe not Indonesia, I don't know.

But definitely everybody Afghan Afghanistan, everybody's got the same thing going.

And it's like

You know why that is?

Because we all know deep down that all of these borders are fake.

You know, in the Middle East, and that we're actually there's no difference between us.

There's no difference between me and a Palestinian.

Or I mean, I'm ethnically speaking, you get what I'm saying?

There's no difference between a Lebanese and a Palestinian.

There's no difference between an Iraqi and a Pal.

There are differences between tribes.

In any given country in the Middle East, of course, there's difference.

There's differences between tribes.

But at the fundamental level of the state, there's no difference.

No border or territory or boundary can really fundamentally separate these people.

And that's the truth.

There's no fundamental difference.

No border can separate them.

I mean,

Uh, feuds can separate people, but not as a border, a modern border.

Remember, a modern border, I should get into this in my lecture.

Borders between countries are not just I'm different than you.

It's this is the absolute line beyond which I will die for to defend.

This is the line that defines who I am, my ultimate existence, my ultimate identity.

This is the line defining that, right?

So, this is what I mean.

Deep down in the Middle East, no one believes in the borders we have, nobody does.

These lines are all fake, and Israel is seen as the number one.

Line maker in a way, right?

Thank you, Anonymous.

Afghanistan.

Iraq.

Yemen.

Palestine.

Pakistan.

Malaysia.

What we have in common is critical race theory.

Wasn't expecting that.

But uh

I I'm I'm kind of really upset at how recklessly people are comparing this to uh the American Indian removal and the whole history of displacement of uh indigenous Americans, putting indigenous quotations 'cause

It's just such a meaningless word.

Like

It it doesn't refer to anything specific, but uh

The Palestine issue is so fundamental because it's a regional thing.

It's not just a regional thing.

You know, it's like nobody believes in the borders in the Middle East.

Um and the borders aren't real.

They're not real.

How can you what is the someone tell me this?

What is the basis of the border between Iraq and Syria?

I don't know.

You s do you know the map of Iraq and Syria?

If you understand the geography of the Middle East, it's it looks very weird.

There's just this big line.

Why?

You know, why?

Oh, remove.

Just cause?

No, I just felt like it.

You know?

Is there's no fucking reason for it.

It's completely arbitrary.

I mean, it'd be one thing if these were borders settled by a war.

If they were warring all the time, they're like, okay, this is our boundary.

We conclude that because.

But that's not the case.

It's just some Europeans drew up a map.

Some colonial European powers drew up a map.

It's really the British Empire.

They drew up a map.

And they said, Okay, this is the borders, and that's it.

What that's this is like in Africa, you know, you there's a reason in Africa

Why all those Africans said we're all South African.

When it came to fighting apartheid,

There's a reason they all were invested in that because they don't believe in their borders.

So I'm telling you, it's similar in the Middle East.

The borders are not real.

Nobody believes in them.

And why the Palestine conflict is central to that fact?

Is because this is the most fundamental case of artificial borders and territories being imposed on people to the detriment directly of their way of living.

Now, the Iraqi borders are not directly to the detriment of the local way of living.

The Syrian borders aren't.

They're not directly that, right?

But in Palestine, these borders are what cut across people's fucking water lines or electricity lines, right?

These borders are what prevent people even from having a normal fucking way of life.

So it's so fundamental because it's part of the consciousness, the regional consciousness, that when all is said and done,

These artificial states are an impediment.

To reconciling the traditional way of life in the region with modernity, with the modern age, right?

That ultimately speaking,

The Palestinians epitomize

this kind of persecution or this kind of

Um

impossibility of maintaining a normal way of life

Within the framework of Sykes-Bicot.

Even your homes are taken from you, you're completely displaced and uprooted, it's a fucking disaster.

So that's why it's so fundamental, you know?

It's a regional thing, it's not just it's not just Palestine, it's a whole regional thing.

Why do you think people in Yemen are like, We will go with our sandals to go and fight in Palestine?

'Cause think about it from a materialist perspective.

What do Yemenis have to do with that?

They're all the way in Yemen.

What do they have to do with it?

Is it just 'cause they share an identity?

Is it just 'cause they share the same religion?

No.

It's it's even more than that, you know?

It's it's the fact

That when Yemenis see what's going on in Palestine, they relate to it.

They see that as the most central thing of their own existential predicament in the modern world.

They look at that and they say, This is this is um

The best summary and the best example of what we face here in Yemen.

What we've lost, right?

So

This is the awakening consciousness of the region.

It's a regional awakening.

This isn't simply about Israel coming in, committing injustices, and then the situation needing to be rectified.

That's not that's not this is beyond Israel, is what I'm trying to say.

This is about a regional awakening.

Of

These I don't know what you want to call it, the Islamic civilizations.

Putting their foot on the ground,

and announcing their existence in the modern world.

That they have something to say, they have something to be, they have something to offer to modernity.

They have a statement to make.

Just like there was a European modernity, just like there was the Russian modernity, just like there was a Chinese modernity, the people of the Middle East are saying, We have our own.

response to modernity.

We have our own way of

Relating our existence to that

And broadcasting our existence to the world.

We have our own statement to make, we have our own.

Eschatology to fulfill.

That's the best way to put it.

We have our own civilizational eschatology to fulfill.

We have our own journey, if you want to put it that way.

And it's similar to why do you the most apt comparison I can make when it comes to the Palestinian struggle.

Is to the Chinese.

The Chinese always refer to the century of humiliation.

The Chinese century of humiliation was the Chinese Napka.

That was their Napka.

That was their Israel.

Their Israel was Japan, it was the European powers, it was.

The warlord era, right?

And when China

stood up, right, to overcome that.

That was China's way of saying we have something to say.

We have a statement to make.

We have our own take on responding to modernity.

Literally responding as in a dialectic, right?

We have our own sublation of modernity, and the world will bear witness to our awakening, to the awakening of our civilization.

We exist.

That was the statement of the Chinese.

We exist.

Right?

So something happened similarly in the Middle East beginning, it didn't begin here, but part of it was the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The Arab-Israeli conflict starting in 1948.

That's what awakened the people in the Middle East.

From the Arab-Israeli conflict, you got Baathism and you got Nasser.

You got Nasserism.

The first form of like modern consciousness as it pertains to the civilizations.

Ultimately, these failed because they were imposing the paradigm of the nation state.

So they failed.

They failed to articulate the realities, right?

Then came Iran 1979, and that was another awakening.

They call it the Islamic Awakening, right?

Now my prediction for the region.

Is there has to be a third awakening.

Because the Islamic Awakening did learn it didn't just abandon nationalism, it absorbed aspects of Nasser and the nationalism.

For example, Hezbollah, you can s call them uh nationalists in some sense, right?

The third awakening, I think, will have to happen.

Um

And

You know, biased as I am,

I think the third awakening will be red.

When I say we'll be red, I mean we'll be a communist awakening.

But who I d who am I to say that?

You know?

But

I am a communist, so you know, that's like what I believe.

But if it doesn't happen, it doesn't I that's just that's just my opinion, I guess, right?

Not a return to the old communism, but a new synthesis of communism, which learns from the nationalism and learns from the Islamic Awakening and synthesizes them, just like China synthesized the Republican nationalism.

and the Boxer Rebellion and stuff.

Just like the c uh Mousy Tongue thought, right?

So

This is my my view.

As a communist.

Something like Gaddafi, no, explicitly communism, right?

Because I want I want to, I mean, ideologically speaking, I don't know if this is the time to even talk about this, but ideologically speaking.

I support I mean, I support the Mukauma in spirit ideologically, and I believe they are more advanced than any Communist forces on earth in many ways.

But there are Namukawa faces obstacles and limitations.

Which I'm not sure you can go without.

Some kind of

You know, it's like a primary and secondary contradiction.

If you're in China, you fight with the KMT.

Of course, you do, against the Japanese invaders.

Sun Yat-sen is the s Sun Yat-sen was the Khomeini of China, right?

But there's also a secondary contradiction and

I have no doubt that secondary contradiction will bear fruition.

Uh in history.

I have no doubt about that.

But but this but the this I mean this conflict in the I mean, think about it like this.

I was in a very contemplative move t mood today, right?

So it got me thinking about a lot of different things.

in the contemplative mood that I was in.

Think about it like this, okay?

Give me a second.

Think about it like this.

Why does this conflict divide the world so much?

Israel versus pop this is the one thing that dominates everything.

Not even just 'cause it's on the news right now, but it's like, look, Israel population.

No Buana, let's go.

Let's fucking go.

Let's fucking go!

Israel's population is nine million.

The Palestinian population within Israel is five million.

Now, granted.

The Palestinian diaspora population

is approximately seven million.

So this this is not uh justified by the population size, okay?

The significance of this conflict is not justified by the size of the population, just of Israel and Palestine.

So, why is it so central, right?

I think it's central because it has acquired the significance of this kind of absolute threshold of Western modernity, just an absolute threshold.

Now, Ukraine was a threshold of Western modernity.

There's plenty of thresholds where Western modernity must face forces beyond, right?

This was Nazi Germany, by the way.

Nazi Germany was Western modernity facing the threshold of beyond, right?

Now, Israel.

Israel is a kind of absolute threshold of Western modernity.

Which um

which centralizes questions as fundamental of what is national identity, what is the basis of a state,

What is our connection to land?

What is our connection to uh

What what glues us together as a people?

Right?

Um

And I think existentially America is

fundamental here, right?

But Israel epitomizes the criminality of of the criminal excesses, I think, of Anglo Saxon modernity.

I think that's how I would put it.

Israel epitomizes the criminal excesses.

of Anglo-Saxon modernity, but also on the metaphysical plane.

What do I mean by metaphysical plane?

I'm using that word very loosely here.

I mean to say South Africa was similar.

South Africa epitomized the criminal excesses of Anglo-Saxon modernity.

And by a uh by uh

Criminal excesses, I mean, the ways in which this type of modernity is incompatible with human life, and which, therefore, when faced with human life, responds by persecuting it, by punishing it, by keeping it down, by making sure that it can't breathe and become what it is.

Right?

This is what I mean by criminal excess.

So, Israel.

Represents

The criminal excess of Anglo-Saxon modernity.

But given a supreme metaphysical significance.

Now, what is the metaphysical significance that I'm talking about?

To be clear, right?

Well, the religious element is definitely there, and you see this with the evangelical.

Movement in the U.S.

and its relation with Israel.

You know, the kind of myth-making about Israel and the eschatological implications.

Eschatology is very important in that regard, which is ironic a little bit because you see, Judaism as a tradition is very, very, very skeptical of claims to the status of Messiah.

The Orthodox Judaism does not.

Will not accept someone coming and saying, I am the Messiah.

I mean, that's how it's sharply distinguished from Christianity and even Islam to an extent, right?

So there have been various kinds of claims to Messiah in the history of Judaism, all of which were considered heretical.

And if you want to expound Zionism in religious terms, it's also if it's expounded in religious terms.

And it doesn't originate as religious, but if you were to translate it in religious terms, it would be also a heretical movement, claiming this is.

This is the Messiah.

We are building the third temple, literally, right?

And returning to Israel, where Israel in Judaism was a metaphysical concept.

So actually going to the actual geographic landmass that corresponded with what was in the Bible is like what they say.

It's like imminentizing the eschaton, right?

Which is how that guy, forget his name, described all the totalitarian movements of the 20th century as like Gnostic in nature, right?

They want to imminentize the eschaton and literally create by direct modern scientific material means.

Some kind of prophesied ends of a total ideology and so on and so on.

Anyway,

Anyway, so it's not coming from Judaism, but it is a site in which.

The metaphysical conflict of modernity with

The eschatologies of traditional religion are being borne out.

On all fronts.

So, in Judaism itself,

The Orthodox Jews who are opposed to Zionism, what's their beef with it?

Their beef with it is that this is a debasement of the Jewish eschatology.

This is a complete abomination.

It's a heretical, wicked deviation from the Jewish kind of eschatological view of how the Jewish religion conceives the relation of man to the end of times, right?

Literally trying to create it directly instead of recognizing it's something more transcendent.

Like, I remember there was a rabbi who described the third temple and what does it mean to rebuild the third temple?

And he said, The third temple is not literally being rebuilt by our hand.

The third temple is something transcendent.

When we do good in the world and when we correspond with

When our life corresponds with the Torah, we are built we are in this sense building the third temple.

This is how we're building it.

This is how we're building the foundation.

So it's a more kind of spiritual concept.

Right?

To give you an idea.

Now at the level of the Islamic religion, the eschatological uh

Significance is very clear.

Because of the Al-Aqsa mosque, right, and its significance within Islam.

But also,

Uh in terms of Christianity, I

It's d I mean, beyond the evangelical idea that Muslims and Jews kill each other and then Christ comes back.

Uh.

I'd have to think about that one, so ho

Uh put that on a shelf, right?

I'd have to return to that to think about it more clearly.

But also in Islam, I think we are witness what Israel really is, is a confrontation between

The

How would I put it?

The Leviathan of Modernity with the Islamic view of.

Of the world, right?

In the Islamic view, the notion of a fixed territory with absolute boundaries is radically alien, right?

The Islamic view views the earth as kind of smooth and continuous, like Deleuze would describe, right?

A smooth space.

Because it was just it was uh founded by nomads.

It was uh a religion of nomads, right?

So Israel is seen as an obstruction upon the smooth space, the smooth, natural, and organic continuum of the land, right?

It's an obstruction.

It's man building something saying, this is absolute.

This is completely like, this is like this is heretical.

Not just heretical.

Sorry.

This is idolatrous.

You're saying that you're God, basically.

That you're.

You can create something you have absolute certainty of with a beginning and an end.

Obviously this is s s something about this is

Disastrous.

From an Islamic perspective.

And this is where they're directly, it's an internal struggle of Islamic civilization.

Because you guys, well, Muslim countries also have borders.

You're right.

This is why it's not just an outer jihad where it's Muslims fighting the Jews.

This is the most stupid rendition of the conflict, is when they say it's Muslims versus Jews.

This is not a conflict between Muslims and Jews.

This is a conflict between Muslims and their own.

um inability to respond to modernity.

It's a conflict of

It's an inner it's an internal conflict of how can these two

How can modernity be reconciled with Islamic civilization?

That's what the conflict is about.

And Palestine is central to it because that is literally where people are being.

uh persecuted by this.

It's like a direct confrontation.

People simply trying to live their organic way of life.

They have their olive trees and their small gardens.

They have their homes.

The home is so sacred and fundamental in the Middle East civilization.

It's something eternal.

It's not like.

There's a uh put it this way, there's a lot of sentimental value attached to the home.

Um

This is the place of your dignity and your honor.

The home is everything, right?

Along with the olive trees and so on and so on.

It's the foundation of of being a human being.

So, when this is directly something being violated and obstructed, that is kind of a complete rendition of the conflict at hand.

Like, that is that is what makes it absolute.

When people can't fucking just live their lives as they had been in the past, when you're when you know, when you're

When your jiddo's house is being bulldozed

That means your grandfather's house.

This is where the all the family comes together and so on.

When when you witness that being just demolished, there's something traumatic about that, right?

It's unthinkable, it's inconceivable.

Yeah.

You know, people, uh, liberals, I don't care what what type of Zionist it is, but all kinds of Zionists.

We'll always kind of look for solutions.

Based on a problem they don't understand.

They'll say, Why not just accept this line and this boundary?

And it's like the reason they will never accept any boundary.

is because they don't even accept their own boundaries.

You what I'm saying?

They will never accept any boundary.

They will never accept a two-state solution, a three-state solution.

It will never be possible.

Because you're effectively saying, How can you be bribed in order to give up your right to existence?

When I say right to existence, I don't just mean the la the right to biologically subsist.

I mean the right to the existence.

Of being what you are at the level of civilization, right?

The right to exist as you are.

As you are, meaning all of your culture, your civilization, your Dasein, if you want to put it in Heideggerian terms and so on and so on.

That's what's meant by the right to exist.

And in defense of that right to exist,

These people in the Middle East will die.

They will quite literally give up their biological subsistence to pursue their right to exist.

See, existence and biological subsistence are not the same thing.

You can live.

You can be put in a fucking hospital and be brain dead, and you can be living, right?

But you're not existing.

You understand?

Or you can be an individual and you can go to Starbucks and consume and be Airy Fairy and you can go to rave concerts and do all these things, but you're not existing.

You're not existing.

You have no existence.

You're like a fucking animal.

You're like a.

A caged rat who's just going through the motions of a life instead of truly living one.

Because in order to exist, you have to fulfill not just the standard necessary in order to subsist at the biological level, you need to fulfill a meaning and a purpose and a place.

That's the most important one.

You need to fulfill a place in the world.

And in order to fulfill a place in the world, you have to be situated in an organic civilizational or social context.

You have to be something beyond yourself.

You have to dwell within something that gives you purpose and gives you meaning and defines your existence, right?

This is my way of life.

This is why I'm doing it.

This is the honor that I'm defending.

And this is the whole of what I am.

That's what it means to exist, to have an existence.

So those who are coming from the modern liberal perspective, who are trying to look for solutions to this conflict, don't understand what this conflict is about.

This conflict is not about materially satisfying

Your wants and needs.

Like, it's not just about having enough wealth or having enough.

Consumer goods or having enough, uh, what it's not about that, it's about having an existence.

Let me show you.

Um,

A speech by Hassan Nasrallah, which was given a long time ago, which will get which will show you exactly what I'm talking about here.

It'll show you exactly what I'm talking about.

Here it is.

Here it is.

Thought it was deleted.

So this was a OG speech from decades ago.

This is what the height of his charisma as a leader.

I'll show this.

Atuna La Nalaman.

Washa Philistine La Manala.

At Falu Philostin La Manalaum.

Mujaidu Philostine Lamanelaum.

Al-Khutsula Amanala.

Al-Majidula Sala Amanala.

Atotuna Aman.

Waulail.

Madlumud al-Mutadun.

La Aman Elakum.

Etzma Yu al-Mustakbeo.

La'anal Kala.

Wala Namanak.

So focus on what he says.

He said, may the curse of God be upon you and your safety.

And this is what the Western mind doesn't understand.

This is what they don't understand.

So he's talking about they were giving Hezbollah the offer.

They will cross you off the terrorist list.

You can enjoy a free status.

Just give up the Palestinians.

Stop fighting for them.

Now, if you listen to his speech, the Western mind, the leftist mind, may translate this as him saying, I am just empathetic.

I'm just morally high grounding, right?

I'm pretending I'm above what's material and it's just morality.

That's it.

But you're abstracting it from its context if you're doing that.

He's not saying we're just going to do this for Palestinians as a favor.

Uh, because we're so good.

He's saying they are us.

How can we have safety and they don't have safety?

There's no difference between us.

We're the same thing.

We have our subjectivity is not the individual consumer who's safe, who's having an eye.

That's not our existence.

That's not who we are.

Our existence is more than that.

Your safety cannot satisfy our existence because you can't guarantee the safety of what?

And he talks about things that sound metaphysical, right?

The Al-Aqsa mosque.

What does he mean by the safety of the Al-Aqsa mosque?

He means a metaphysical safety.

He means the liberation.

Of the Islamic civilizations or the Middle Eastern peoples from the yoke of Anglo-Saxon modernity.

That's exactly what he means.

And ultimately, his words, what's driving his words, if you want to expound this into geopolitical terms, what's driving his speech and his words, thank you so much, Blackpack.

The American mind should understand it.

He who would trade security for liberty deserves neither.

Yeah, but this is even more than that, right?

Because, no, that is, no, no, that is a good way to translate it in a sense.

But that begs the question: liberty for what?

Because they have a what.

This is what I'm getting to.

What's driving these words from him is ultimately a striving and a passion for regional integration, for a united Middle East of a civilization state.

Your best guess is mine as far as what that would look like.

But that's what this is about.

It's about a civilization state of the Middle East.

And if you want to know what that's going to look like, I only say look at the past for clues, because the Middle East has always been civilization states, culminating in what?

The Ottomans and the Safavids, right?

So, is it a return of those, or is it a return of a mixture of those two?

Or I don't know.

I couldn't tell you.

That's for the people of the Middle East to decide themselves.

But what's animating this kind of passion that you're seeing from Nasrallah, what's animating it, isn't leftist-style moral grandstanding, it's a very concrete struggle for existence, it's a struggle.

For an existential predicament of everyone in the Middle East.

And and and a voice that is not being heard.

What is the voice not being heard?

It's the voice of a people who have no recognition in the modern age.

They have no recognition.

They have no existence.

They're just backward tra I mean, look at how Hezbollah and Hamas are portrayed by the media, or the Palestinians are portrayed by the media.

They're beheading babies, they're doing they don't have recognition, they're not even seen as human.

You know?

Their way of life is not respected by the modern world.

Their values are not respected.

Therefore, they have no dignity.

That's why he talks about dignity in this speech.

It's not just an empty phrase.

It it means something concrete.

And if you want to be a materialist, that concrete

is a civilizational

Regional state.

That's what this is about.

This is about a fight for a very particular civilization.

And I'm this is my understanding from the perspective of multipolarity, right?

It's a fight for a polarity.

This is a poll, a polarity animating and driving the passions of the people in this region.

This is what they're fighting and they're dying for.

I mean, it's literally a pull driving and attracting them.

And if you say, well, it's religion.

Yes, of course.

Uh religion but religion is part of that civilization, you understand?

The civilization and the religion

are continuous

Religion is not an abstractly contrived set of principles and beliefs.

Religion is a type of feeling, you know?

It's a specific form of feeling, belief from the heart, not from the head, from the heart.

You understand?

And the way of life and the civilization which corresponds to that is very particular and specific, you know?

And this is what they're fighting for.

When people say, oh, they're religious fanatics, they just want to impose their religion on everyone.

That's not true.

Their religious belief they have is also existential, right?

It's also about how they make sense of their world and what they are themselves.

So it's also a form of self-consciousness, you know?

Um, it's not about uh, see, the because the western mind brackets things into two from the Cartesian dualism stuff, right?

It's like on the one hand, you have religion, which is this pure ethereal spirit, and on the other hand, you have you know, um, you have the blind force of nature, which is where nationality is and where race is.

But in this case, you don't have that dualism, right?

The rel the spiritual and the material are of the same essence, they're not separated.

And uh, this is why attempts to bribe Hezbollah and other people in the Middle East have failed.

It's failed because.

They don't see these things as separate.

They don't see the satisfaction of your material needs and your spiritual needs as separate.

Those are the same thing for them, right?

Like, for example, it's like if I drink water, I'm satisfying my thirst.

But

Is that all I'm doing?

I'm satisfying my thirst for a reason.

What's that reason?

It's it's about why I'm living, what I'm living for, and therefore what would I die for?

And this is why they have a different view of death.

This is why they're willing to die, because they've they have an understanding of life in terms of existence.

So they have something to die for.

You know, they claim Israelis love life and the Arabs love death.

It's like, okay, but there's a reason for that, right?

That's because the Israelis.

Are just Western liberal.

It's just Western liberalism.

That's it.

They have nothing to die for.

Except shaking their ass on TikTok, like everyone else in the West.

So, this is what I'm trying to say.

And look, you don't have to agree with me.

You don't have to agree with me that this is good or this is bad.

Forget that normative terms.

I'm just trying to say: anyone who's approaching this conflict, not taking this into account, you're not going to understand.

Oh, why are the Palestinians so irrational?

Why won't they just take a deal so they can live?

Because biologically subsisting is not enough.

Because it's not enough.

Because that's not what they are.

because they will not submit to your regime.

Israel is the regime of the British Empire and now the Unipolar Empire.

And you're saying, what is your price to submit to this regime?

And what are they saying?

They're saying,

There's no price because it will never happen because we would rather die than submit to your regime.

We would rather die than submit to your regime of pornography, of nihilism.

of madness, of insanity, of LGBTQ, of this and that.

They would rather die than do that.

So they won't submit to the regime.

They never will.

They would rather die than submit to the regime.

Thank you, Zhang Yu.

Appreciate you so much, man.

Each pole, each civilization has different values.

And the fulfillment, the ability for those values to be fulfilled is what corresponds to their dignity.

Anyone who attempts to impose an external regime

Upon a people will be met with their full ferocity and their full resistance.

Why should China have submitted to the regime imposed upon them by the colonial powers?

Why should they have done that?

They chose death instead.

They took up arms and fought with their lives to liberate themselves.

Because life is not enough.

Biological life is not enough.

It's the fulfillment of the aspiration of your ancestors, of your forefathers.

How would they look down upon you knowing you submitted

To an honorless regime out of what?

Bribery?

Out of convenience?

That's no life.

That's no life.

So I hope this perspective gives allows you to understand why they fight.

And why Israel simply cannot exist.

It cannot exist.

There is no real existence corresponding to Israel.

It doesn't have an existence.

Do you understand?

It's not a civilization.

Taking people from around the world strictly on the basis of their religion, putting them in one place and expecting them to fulfill what is becoming of a nation is stupid.

You're abstra- You are violating the Jewish religion.

You're abstracting people from the very context in which the Jewish religion could make sense.

The J you see, people say, oh, well, well, well, Jews have never had their own homeland.

Well

The Jewish religion that evolved and and survived I don't want to say evolved to insult, I would say survived very much spiritually deals with the implications of exile.

That's part of the identity.

It's part of what it means to be Jewish, at least religiously speaking.

Because there's something true about that.

And the consequence has been what?

Fighting idolatry.

Fighting idolatry.

But in any case

Israel cannot exist.

I'm telling you, it cannot exist.

It's not do I want it to exist.

It cannot exist.

You understand?

It cannot exist.

This is not just about morality.

It cannot exist.

You see what I mean?

It has no existence.

Look at Israeli citizens.

They're nihilistic.

They don't believe.

They're cynical.

They don't believe in their own uh national project.

They have nothing to live for and nothing to die for.

How is that in existence?

What existence corresponds to that?

And how divided is Israel?

What unites Israel?

Think about it.

What unites it?

Being Jewish, well that's a point of contention itself.

So what really unites Israel?

Pure force, pure power.

Simple as that.

What unites Israel is the pretense to pure force and pure power.

Literally, why why are people in the IDF in Israel?

Because they have forcible conscription.

Because they're conscripted.

And what happens if you don't get conscripted?

You go to jail.

So people go and they say, I'll join the army and get conscripted.

Force, just pure force.

What sustains the state of Israel?

What is the basis of the state of Israel?

Is it people who choose to live and die in a certain way and establish a state corresponding to that, organically j flowing from their from their being and their existence?

No.

The basis of the Israeli state is pure force.

Nothing else.

Nothing else.

Nothing else.

The authority of pure force.

Pure, pure force.

That's it.

The problem with Zionism, the problem with Israel, and the entire basis upon which it rests.

is that pure force is not pure.

Force in nature is contaminated with purpose.

It's not pure.

Every force that sustains you has an eschatology, has a purpose, has a beginning and an end, and a rational conclusion that accounts for it.

Pure force is not pure force.

its force combined with fear,

But what happens when no one fears your force?

Is it a force any more?

At that point, it's a

You can kill them.

You can blow them up.

Can you kill all of them without being killed yourself?

You can't.

People always say, oh, Israel can glass the whole Middle East.

They can't.

They simply can't.

'Cause if they did that, someone would come in and blow them up.

They have no pure force.

The thing that the the the idol of the it's an idol it's an idol it's an idol of modern metaphysics

And it's not sustainable.

And it can't exist.

Pure force cannot sustain any state.

You think China exists just 'cause pure force?

Because of the force of the state?

That's what k keeps people in line, no.

That's not what keeps China in line.

What keeps China in line

is a people cognizant of themselves.

Thank you so much, Australistani, appreciate you.

Cognizant of their civilization.

And if it wasn't the Communist Party dictatorship, it would be something else.

But it would still be China.

That's the beauty of it.

It would still be China.

But if the Zionist regime disappeared, there would be no Zionist regime ever again.

Because it has no roots in its own people, it has no roots in the land, it has no roots.

In any civilization, in any people, in any community.

If the Zionist entity was overthrown, there would be no way it could ever refound itself.

How many times has the government of the Rus civilization been overthrown?

Hundreds, probably.

I mean, I'm exact.

At least dozens.

Look at the time of they've always and they always come back as the Rus.

They always come back.

How many times have the dynasties of China collapsed?

Plenty.

And they've always come back.

They've always come back.

How many times?

Has the Iranian Empire collapsed?

Dozens, countless dozens, and they've always come back.

They've always come back.

How many times have the Romans collapsed?

Many times.

and they always come back.

Whether they're the Ottomans or the Byzantines,

Or something else.

The Greeks

Were the Latins

This is not true for Israel.

Israel is a fake country.

It's a fake state.

If Israel collapsed, nothing would take its place.

corresponding to that state.

That region of the world has always been a part of a greater whole.

And Israel is an abstraction.

It's an abstraction from the concrete whole.

So, even if you are a Zionist, why do I not hate Zionists, by the way?

Zionists hate me.

They call for my death.

They hate me.

They give me death threats.

They hate me.

They hate me.

I don't hate them.

I don't hate them.

Why don't I hate them?

Because I'm telling them, I'm telling you, Israel cannot exist.

This is not about your feelings.

This is not about your morals even.

This is a simple fact of physics.

Call it a fact of physics.

It cannot exist.

It's a s it's a the laws of history.

It's objective science, it's simple science, Israel cannot exist.

It simply cannot exist.

And you may be emotionally invested in the State of Israel.

You may believe in Israel.

You may.

It doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter.

It's it cannot exist.

And this is simple, simple science.

This is simple science.

This is not about hating Jews.

This is not about anything about Jews.

It's not.

Um Jews were chosen for this project because it's in the Middle East.

And Europeans always associated Jews with the Middle East.

So they encouraged them to go to the Middle East.

To en to be the enforcers.

For the British Empire.

So this is not about Jews, this is not about Muslim versus Jews, this is not what that's about.

I want to also talk about something that's really been bothering me.

which has been how people are trying to compare this to the expulsion of indigenous people in the United States.

Because I remember the viciousness of leftists, and they would say, Oh, you're just like a Zionist.

You don't believe in land back.

You don't believe in land back.

You're a Zionist.

So let me address this.

Very clearly.

Let me address this very clearly, with no ambiguity.

Um

So they say, well,

Morally speaking,

Since Israel is stolen land.

Shouldn't it and therefore it has no right to exist?

Since America is stolen land, isn't it also a fake country that has no right to exist?

The problem is that stealing land alone is not what makes your country fake.

First of all.

So that's just the first thing.

The fact land is stolen is not what makes a country fake.

Period.

What makes or break a country's reality isn't whether it's stolen or not.

So that's the first thing we need to get past.

The second thing I would say is that

The reason the comparison is wrong is because the Palestinian struggle doesn't come from transcendent Western leftist morality.

It comes from the concrete reality of the people living there.

They are waging a struggle, and your support doesn't matter.

So it's about being objective.

This is why I'm being objective and not moralizing.

I say Israel cannot exist.

Not should it or should it exist.

So let's get that out of the way.

Now

The indigenous peoples of the US are not waging any kind of struggle comparable to the Palestinians right now.

They are not taking up I mean they have in the past and they failed.

And we admire those who did that in the past, and they're admirable, and they're heroes, and they're legends.

But this is simply not a reality that exists anywhere outside the fantasies of American leftists.

And what what I mean by this is the notion that all of the land that was stolen from them will be returned to them.

Where is the reality?

You claim this is morally necessary.

If a morality is not commensurate with reality, how can it be moral?

Where w what do you mean it's moral?

It's not even real.

There's no basis for that being possible.

And they say, well,

If we just acted morally it could be possible.

Act as morally as you want, it will never happen.

So, what you really want is the right to condemn everyone who's not going to go along with it because they won't, as immoral.

And therefore have the right to kind of terrorize and uh bother and pester and and be a pretentious retard who thinks they're above uh everyone else.

That's and be an anti-social freak.

That's what you're saying.

So it's not comparable.

It's not comparable whatsoever.

Okay?

Now, I haven't even started talking about this.

The other thing is, the Palestinian struggle is not just about Palestinians seeking land back.

Their seeking for land back is an existential struggle that is about the awakening of the entire region.

So, it's a polar struggle of the entire region.

Now, such an awakening.

has not occurred among American Indigenous people yet.

Maybe it can in the future.

But insofar as such an awakening happens, an awakening of Indigenous consciousness where they

Stand to the task of discovering themselves in the modern age.

Guess what?

I think that will be an American awakening.

They will be spiritually leading our country because America is also searching for that.

This is what I was trying to say.

America is also searching.

The difference between America and Israel is very simple.

Israel has a false certainty about what it is, but America is searching for what it is and is not.

Doesn't have a uh um

a definite conclusion.

America is not saying we are the Jewish state or we are we are this, we are that.

No, there's no certainty about what America is going to be.

We don't know.

It's an open door.

America is an open door.

As far as what it what its existence will be.

Now, does America have an existence now?

Maybe we don't know.

We don't know what the American existence is.

But an awakening of indigenous consciousness comparable to the Middle East region will strengthen the American National Project.

It will provide us with spiritual leadership and spiritual inspiration and guidance.

To discover what we are because we don't know.

You understand?

We don't know.

Additionally,

Additionally, you have very simple matters.

Like, the reason why there's a real estate dispute in Israel is also because of the Palestinian diaspora, specifically the diaspora in the Middle East, and the central significance of the right of return.

If there are indigenous people campaigning for a right of return, I fully support them.

Whose ancestors were exiled and expelled from our country or the landmass corresponding to our country.

Thank you so much, Mecca.

Praying for them, man.

That's tough.

Thank you so much, Mecca.

I appreciate you, man.

That's tough.

I'm praying for them, man.

They say, well, Americans are settlers just like Israelis are settlers.

And that's just not true.

That's just not true.

That's just not true.

Americans were settlers because they were searching for a new life without knowing what that life would be.

But Israelis are settlers on the basis of an unjustifiable certainty that their specific way of life is superior to everyone around them.

their morality and their Western values and so on and so on.

So it's very different actually.

And yes, many crimes were committed against indigenous people who lived here, absolutely.

But that alone is not enough to make for a national struggle.

A national struggle isn't based on.

By the way, here's another problem.

This is the element of hypocrisy.

The very basis with which you condemn the criminality of the founding of America is also the very basis of that criminality.

Meaning, yes, corresponding to colonialism and modernity.

Was an unprecedented criminality.

Yes, I agree.

I'm not one of the people who just say to you, oh, well, the Indians were fighting each other too and stealing each other's land.

I know the difference between their ruthless modernity of progress and the eradication and extermination of traditional cultures, civilizations, and lifestyles, and how this is an abomination at the level of meaning.

So I understand the unprecedented criminality of colonialism.

But with the unprecedented criminality of colonialism also comes the unprecedented sense of absolute morality, absolute and universal morality, which pre-modern civilizations did not have.

So, for you to, for example, say that on a universal perspective, this is absolutely immoral.

That came from the same thing that killed the Indians.

You see?

So you're a hypocrite.

The very premises with which you condemn America's founding as a country.

Are is the object of condemnation itself.

You're condemning your own premises.

So let's not abandon and throw away the American.

country and the legitimacy of America as a country, which is a matter of objective fact, just because its history is written with immorality, criminality, and injustice.

Because what I mean, slavery was a comparable injury.

I mean, probably one of the worst injustices committed by man to man in the history of the world was modern colonial slavery.

Right?

But let's not let this claim that the this entire country is illegitimate, because the same thing that allows you to recognize the criminality of slavery

is also what you're condemning, the history of this country.

You heal the wound with the spear which smote it.

That's the Hegelian logic.

So America is not illegitimate because its history is written with criminality, excess and immorality.

And justice is accomplished in history very rarely.

When the injustice is reversed.

Justice in history, if you understand dialectics, if you understand Hegel, or if you've just read the Bible.

Comes like a thief in the night.

The rectification of injustice, the establishment of justice on earth, is always an irony.

It's always a cunning of history.

I'll give you an example.

The Romans.

The Romans crucified Jesus.

The Romans conquered Judea, they persecuted the Jews, the Jews were conquered.

So the Jews said, Where is my justice?

and they fought the Romans with so much veracity and s and they kept failing every time.

So where was the justice for the Jews?

It was in the Roman Republic itself, when Julius Caesar, who was

gave form to the contradictions of the Republic, and he was killed and assassinated, and the empire rose.

And the empire eventually fell to what?

To Christianity.

Isn't that ironic?

So this is an example of the ironies of history, avenging the injustice of the past.

The Hegelian twist of history, which establishes justice in a way no one could have foreseen.

So the land back people are saying, for example, the only way to rectify the wrongdoing of the past is by giving all of the indigenous people back the land that was stolen.

Throughout all of all of the American landmass, basically, right?

And then some may say the only way to reverse the wrongdoing of slavery is by calculating the exact cost of slavery and giving them it back, the debt back, right?

Uh but the problem with this is it's a crude understanding of how historical injustice is set right.

Justice is given to history almost never actually, I will say never in the form of uh

In the form of reversing the injustice.

In that case, it's not a historical event.

What do I mean by that?

So, if I go to your house and I, for example, kill everyone in your house and, I don't know, set it on fire, right?

How is that injustice dealt with?

Eye for an eye.

And let's say there's a just court system.

Okay, then you have to pay.

You have to.

You have to get justice done.

So, an institution has to oversee this, right?

So, I'm a criminal, I go to jail, or I get beheaded, or tortured, whatever.

And justice is done.

Now, let me ask you a question.

Is that a historical event?

That's not a historical event.

It's not historical proper.

That is just a part of a historical stage we're living in.

It's the daily business of life.

We have a standard of justice and we fulfill it.

So if I go to your if I go and steal your car and then the police catch me and they give the car back to you,

Um

Justice is done.

I stole something from you and it's given back to you.

But that's not a historical event.

To rectify a historical injustice, the injustice has to be incapable of being satisfied.

by the institutions corresponding to that era of history,

In which case, the injustice is rectified by a cunning of history, which gives resolution and meaning to that injustice in a way that no one could have foreseen.

And if you could have foreseen it, it's not historical.

Think about that.

Historical events happen only when they're unforeseen.

That's what makes it historical.

If you could foresee something happening, it's not historical.

Like the sun rising in the morning is not historical.

We know it's going to happen.

But when something happens you can't expect, you have to enter it into your chronicle of history.

Because history is just recording things we didn't know were going to happen.

And now we know them.

You see?

So

Historical justice is not the same thing as the relative justice.

What land back proponents are advocating for is a relative justice overseen by institutions, presumably ones that exist or ones that we ought to create right now.

I think that's an insult to the injustice committed upon

The American Indians.

That's an insult to them.

Now, by the way, when I say land back, I'm not talking about like the relative land back, which is, you know, giving them more land and stuff, honoring old treaties.

Yeah, yeah, that's fine.

I'm talking about the crazy land back that says America's just like Israel, and all of America must be given back to indigenous people.

So, to be clear, that's what I mean by it, right?

That that cannot be that doing justice to that historical crime cannot be done by means of the relative justice.

It has to be a historical justice.

And the historical justice will be the establishment of an American proletarian dictatorship.

And a people state, and the overthrow of the capitalist class, and the reign of private property.

Because it was the reign of private property that was responsible.

for the criminality against the indigenous people.

So that will be a form of justice.

And certainly in an American Communist state, today's justice will be accomplished for indigenous people.

Uh they will no longer have to live in squalor and po uh poverty and being harassed by Feds and so on.

They will have auton autonomy.

Their culture will flourish like never before.

Uh they will repopulate

Um

Repopulate rapidly, and they will be one of the pillars of the future American civilization.

But American civilization must include history, not erase it.

It must include history.

Now, why is this not true for Israel?

Because here's why.

Because Palestinians are not fighting to go back to 1947 and they're not fighting to go back to 1920 and they're not simply fighting for land back.

They are fighting for a state and a civilization worthy of their existence.

And we have no way of knowing what that will look like.

And on account of not knowing that, or at least whatever that is.

not having a ready made precedent.

Justice for the Palestinians will come in a way no one could foresee.

Justice for Palestinians will not come when UN NGOs go to Israel and say, okay, be nicer to the Palestinians.

Give them this, give them that.

No, justice for the Palestinians will come when the Israeli state is toppled and the fucking, I don't know, the Neo-Ottoman Empire rises from the ashes.

Now, don't quote me on that.

I'm not saying the actual Ottoman Empire.

I'm saying something worthy of the history of that region.

A grand empire as vast in scale as these empires.

Like, it is already a the the current the current revolution in the Levant.

The current conflict in Palestine is already a historical irony in the justice that it is, because who's back in Hamas?

Who's back in Hamas?

It's not even the Arabs.

It's fucking Iran, man.

Iran, the Persian Empire.

Isn't that ironic?

Who could have foreseen that?

Iran, the ancient empire of the region.

Thank you, Ryan.

Thank you so much, Ryan.

I appreciate it, man.

Thank you so much.

It's Iran, isn't that a historical irony?

Isn't that incredible?

Who could have foreseen that?

That Iran is coming back?

The Persian Empire?

I mean, the Shah.

Nobody would have expected this in 1960 or 1970.

Iran is the one holding up the Palestinian resistance.

That's already

a historical justice.

That's not simply a return to nineteen forty seven.

No, this is something beyond.

This is an awakening of an ancient empire.

Going far beyond and exceeding far beyond any relative standard of justice carried from the past, such as the two-state solution.

Land back, if anything, is more comparable to the two-state solution.

But it's really not, by the way.

But if it was, but this is going beyond that.

And I don't just mean beyond in terms of the scale of its ambition, I mean beyond in terms of what it is as a historical event.

Why did the Palestinians have to suffer so much?

Why was their land stolen?

Why did they have to go through the Nakba and this nightmare?

They had to go through this in order for that the people of that region could rise to the task of the challenge set before them by the modern age.

That's why.

So you see, in this way we avoid the trap of historical nihilism.

We avoid the trap of making this just about some purely transcendent morality.

No, we unite morality with reality and history itself.

So we need to sharply distinguish our understanding of this struggle from the narrow leftist lens, because that's not what this is.

This struggle is different than uh how it's being framed in the US, where they're saying, oh, this is just the same thing as no, this is not about land back, this is about humanity at the most fundamental level.

Because why am I telling you guys this?

Because the right-wing scumbag grifters are trying to make it seem like that the only opening within the West for appreciating the Palestinian cause is this liberal pink-haired leftism.

And I'm here to announce, no, we can be Westerners, and that's what I am, by the way, and be sympathetic to the Palestinians and understand their struggle without being these liberal leftists.

I gave you an analysis of the situation that draws from Heidegger, you know?

serious, deep, Western oriented contemplation.

In order for we Westerners to understand this conflict, we we go to Heidegger.

We understand things like what is Dasein, what is an existence of a people, for example.

The Iranians were also into Heidegger too, by the way, for the same reason.

I had to reiterate: why did I get into Heidegger?

Because of Palestine, motherfucker.

By the way.

Uh because Palestine is about

A struggle for authentic being against the inauthentic and artificial existence imposed upon them by the State of Israel.

So we can be in the West and understand and think about and interrogate and try to understand the significance of this struggle without either being these disgusting leftists

Or uh who will turn on a dime, by the way, on the Palestinians, or the uh the right wing and the Zionists, because you know, in Israel itself, the Western left is the same as the Israeli left.

You know, there's a left you know there's leftists in Israel itself who are literally just Tel Aviv liberals, complete nihilists.

They're an existential enemy of Palestinians.

And they're literally there.

And all they do is posture that they're pro-Palestinian liberation, just like the Western leftists, right?

It's like how Western leftists say, oh,

If you're an American, you're a settler.

Even though I'm an American and I live here and I'm a settler, I recognize I'm going to check my privilege.

So there's Israeli leftists checking their privilege.

Is this the only way

To have solidarity with the Palestinians, to be a stupid, hypocritical, retarded leftist, no.

And you may ask me, okay, Haas, if you're an Israeli, how would you respond to this?

Let's say you're living in Israel.

How could you show solidarity with the Palestinians?

Simple.

Not only abandon the Zionist delusion, but appreciate their regional future.

Appreciate the fact that if you are going to be part of the future of the Middle East, Israel cannot exist.

And you will have to be a part of a bigger state.

Um

and a broader civilization which you must learn from.

And adapt to in some kind of way because the modern nihilism of the detached hedonistic subject.

Is not what's going to be the future of that region.

So you must.

accept the leadership of the real indigenous forces to the region.

And you say, well, you'd leave.

Sure, you'd leave.

And then go to America and become a leftist who's the same.

No.

I mean, uh, leave it.

Yeah, I mean, no fault in leaving whatsoever.

But for those who cannot leave,

Yeah.

They must accept

The region.

They must accept just like uh in South Africa, you know.

And there will be r there will always be room for Jews in the future of the Middle East.

How do I know that?

I know the history.

That's how I know.

Because I know the history.

Am I saying that Jews and Christians should be dimmies and s no, that's nonsense.

That's nonsense.

Just like how in China they brought back the Chinese civilization, but they didn't go back to these backward practices of uh

Making making uh all the non-Manchus wear that uh

Shave their heads in a certain way.

They didn't go back to that, but in a more fundamental level, they restored the Chinese civilization.

So that's what I would say.

Um

Yeah, there's Israelis who resist the the mandatory military service.

And this is not about hate.

They say this is about hatred.

This is not about the hatred for individuals.

This is about the hatred for a false existence.

For a false.

Evil, oppressor.

Which is the state, the government of Israel.

and those behind this government.

I see the Jordanian king claims to be supporting Palestine right now, but he's allowing Western NATO jets to land in Jordan to defend Israel or support its campaign.

So this is what they say, then.

This is what everyone says this.

China says this, Russia says this.

This is the standard line.

See, look, the 1967 borders is the standard line of those outside of the region.

I'm not saying Russia's bad for having this line.

China's not bad for having this line.

No one's bad for having this line per se, but.

Uh it just doesn't reflect the reality of the region.

That's what it is, you know?

It just doesn't.

And by the way, it w it would never be possible, because the State of Israel would never accept it.

Iran and Saudi Arabia have had phone calls, they're talking together.

I'm aware, I've been made aware.

So guys, tell me this, ones in the chat if you need these streams to start starting way earlier.

Ones in the chat.

Ones if you need these streams to be like way earlier.

And these are too late.

Ones of the stream is too late.

Alright.

Guys, I'm going to do the best I can to start the stream tomorrow.

Earlier, you understand, I'm also working on a book and I'm writing stuff.

So pay attention to that.

I've got a lot of pressure to do this kinda stuff.

Um

Ah, sorry.

Also, I I think there's going to be a new standard.

Either I'm going to take Fridays off or Saturdays off.

But I'm either going to be taking uh Friday off or I'm going to be taking Saturday off, okay?

So I'll tell you

I'll tell you.

I'll let you know.

Friday or Saturday I'll be taking them off.

Okay?

I'll let you know that tomorrow.

I'm streaming tomorrow definitely.

I do try to have in what are these days that I take off, by the way.

I take off days to see my family.

I have family days.

Um, 'cause do you guys know something?

You know, I live with my girlfriend.

Beyond that, the only people I hang out with is my family.

That's it.

Whenever I have free time, I spend it with my family to hang out.

Like watch movies, eat together, drink tea, talk, you know.

And

Let me just tell you guys, when you get to my age, I'm 27 or whatever, it seems like, oh, that's cringe.

That's the best thing in the world, right?

That's the best thing ever.

You don't, that's all you need.

That's all you need.

That is all you need.

Well, that's all I need for a social life.

But other people might be different.

But it's like uh

You know, there's nothing like

The home cooked meal, you know.

I don't know.

Your bank is don't worry about it, you could save it.

Save your dono for tomorrow.

Hope you guys found ones if you found the stream insightful, and twos if you just couldn't follow.

Alright, I'm glad if you guys found it insightful.

I'm glad if you did.

I hope that clears up why this is not comparable to like the land back and and the bigger stakes of this conflict and why people really don't understand what it's about.

Yes, Israel is immoral.

It commits blatant crimes out in the open.

It's a criminal state.

But always keep a broader perspective of this is more than that.

This is not just about Israel being bad, even though it is.

This is about the vi what they're fighting for and struggling for in Palestine.

You know?

And I hope this encourages you to understand.

Put it this way: if you believe Israel.

Can always exist.

You also believe capitalism can always exist.

You also believe unipolarity can also exist.

And the British Empire.

You believe, well, it's just pure force.

Remember, take this quote away from me.

There's no such thing as pure force because force is always contaminated with purpose.

So there's no such thing.

It's always contaminated with a pesky thing called purpose.

Israel cannot exist.

Australistani, let's go!

simply cannot exist.

I saw Putin's statement, yes.

Um

The laws of history ensure the victory of communism, just like the laws of history ensure.

The demise of Israel as a state.

Anyway guys.

I will see you in the next.

Starside