🔴 RED PILL NEWS | PALESTINE WAR 🇵🇸

I'm tongue. I'm waiting for a ride at all.

And next to see it grows.

Look at the Sierra house of you know. Waiting to call, wait for a long door, drinking the heart, I'm following the nilet, I follow with the need on time.

I'm waiting for the moon, time.

I'm waiting for the road, oh, looking at the moon it is now

It's a city is not trying

In my touch

You're asking me but

It's fun

I Even smiling We're not going to for our own time. When you're back to my life, oh, oh, I'm sorry.

When you're going to go.

When you're gone. Wake up. I'm sorry. I'm trying to...

I'm a...

A little...

A little.

A

today.

today.

today. Oh, I'm not. I'm going to be able to...

I'm going today. Before you came around, I was doing just fine.

Usually, usually, I don't pay no mind.

And when it came usually, I don't pay no mind.

And when it came down, I was looking in your eyes.

Suddenly, suddenly, suddenly, I could feel it inside.

I've got a fever, so can you check?

Hand on my fall and kiss my neck.

And then you touch me, baby, I turned red.

I've got a fever, so can you check? I'm not me whopar. Like a medicamine.

I just to try and I

I know that I try that I birded time to boa.

I've got a fever, so can you check?

Hand on my forehead.

Kiss my neck.

And when you touch me, maybe I trust me.

I've got a fever, so can you check?

I don't miss you.

Says the world. Life here, don't miss you. I've got in my eyeux, It's se'vo'

The Fever in their eyes, yes that's the voice

My tear

And the tough And the tough

The most often

It's when I think to you.

I've got a fever, can you check? I've got a fever, can you check?

I know my forehead, kiss my neck.

And when you touch me, baby, I too red.

I've got a fever, so can you try?

Tell me what you want to do right now.

Tell me what you want to do right now.

Tell me what you want to do right now, because I don't really want to pull it out.

Tell me what you want to do right now.

Tell me what you want to do right now.

Tell me what you want to do right now,

because I don't really want to pull it down.

Ketone my tears suffer.

Life here with no use your express to what. the Therebe tend the tears

voice

My heart is that I have

tough and

The most often

is when I think to I've had a little bit too much, much, over all of the people's... I think. The Phrou tb-

tb- tm.

tb- t-

t-

t-

tp. One question. I

shone me and fursh tapy and oh yeah team me and

ther her hummy and

tomb

to live

and refe it

twie

twie

twi

and

the the

to

I We have had tp. P. .

. I'm thearic thearic tbore

the towards

shaltorea cucked

break wreathes their

towards the womb towards the wind And Oh,ma. T'washed in Deli.

And the Karma divide.

T'Kalma'a'f'n'n'e.

T'wa'n'n'a'n'n'e.

And the Kerma'er de'in''e. Welcome, I'm not doing to be a tbri-lived LaGuardia the time to be my lady that's a malady

It's a human I've watched the bean

And moorie today

it won't eat

I've washed tummy and chraffat the toola

Ahwaite cuddie and laughed Wachshed tummy and chraffatellura.

Ahwet couget couget and dhawked and laugh is mrsmachura.

Twashed the smithe.

And the the smell of gisney.

Twaughed the wreathsmi

Twashed this tisnine And rehavet the yasmin

Taweseses buzzar

T'wasin' bar the neskin' barrenes in bed of the Nassau in Burschillacie,

Grubbeye and Beak the Hussra Mwesi.

Oh hashestest us ma'am.

And nuffishen the gulloward. And too'n'n'af'n'a'n'a'n'a'n'a'n'a'n'a'n''e'n''e'n'e'n'e'n'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e'e''e''e'e''e''e''e''e'' Thank you. I'm the today. I think. I'm to bed.

I don't deserve peace because I've been way to bed.

I don't deserve a second chance on earth,

but maybe I will go to heaven.

And even if it doesn't make a sense,

I hope the best until the end.

Forgive me what I've done, let me go to heaven.

I didn't give my best so far but I'm for real come task my heart.

Raise my hands up to the guards, please send me a shooting star.

All I need is one more try.

I want to live for one more time.

In the beginning where the choice is mine, close my eyes and changed my mind.

I'm really hoping for a better place and that I'll never have to learn by wrong ways and

I hope for buddies who support me like a stage and if that's too much take me to heaven

it's okay then. I'm not gonna What can I think?

What can I think?

What can I try? Working on fun. Tell me, who the ends of K. One count on. I can't find peace because I've been way too bad.

I don't deserve a second chance on earth, but maybe I will go to heaven.

And even if it doesn't make a sense,

I hope the best until the end.

Forgive me what I've done, then you go to heaven.

And then you go to your head one. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

Now don't deserve a second chance.

I'm not gonna deserve a second chance.

Oh, I'm the me, go to. I don't deserve a second chance on

Let me go to you.

I thought the heart.

Let me go to go.

I don't deserve a second chance on.

I didn't give up that so far. I've't give up that so far, but I'm free to tou touch my heart.

Raise my hands up to the guard.

Raise my hands up to the guard.

But I need this one more try.

I want to live for one more time.

I didn't give up the second shanthom.

I'm really hoping for a better place. I'm really open for a better place.

Raise my hands up to the gun.

With my foot, hold my time.

Raise my hands down, hold my time.

Take me to heaven, it's okay.

I can't find peace because I've been way too bad. I don't deserve a second chance on earth,

but maybe I will go to heaven.

Let me do heaven, it's okay.

And even if it doesn't make the sense, I hold and days, the thousand may, you send out the rest until the end.

Forgive me what I've turned me forth to you. Oh, you know. So, I'm a try to make a song. Welcome everybody for another day of covering the war in Palestine.

We have a lot of things to talk about, but apparently there's some breaking news.

Well, it's breaking as far as I'm concerned because I haven't seen it up to this point.

Apparently, and I shit you not,

Trump is getting canceled for praising Hezbollah. Now

I'm not going to get too excited. He still does brag about

the killing of Solemani after all.

But I think this is a great development discursively because it makes Maga go on the defensive

and maybe start questioning whether Israel is our greatest ally or not.

So I think that's a great thing regardless of Trump's

intentions and we're going to have to watch that clip and see what's going on

because DeSantis is accusing him of praising Hezboll. Another thing we're going

to be going on Mario Noffal's space, so we have that to look forward

to.

Now here is Ron DeSantis complaining about Trump.

I'm just going to show it to you right off the bat.

I do want to get into the lecture or whatever the philosophy of the conflict,

talk about that. But before I do that, I want to go ahead and show this to you. So this is all I see for

for now.

Terrorists have murdered at least 1,200 Israelis and 22 Americans and are holding more hostage.

So it is absurd that anyone, much less someone running for president, would choose now to attack

our friend and ally Israel, much

less praise Hezbollah terrorists as very smart.

As president, I will stand with Israel and treat terrorists like the scum that they are.

Okay so what did Trump say?

Because it sounds really based.

What did he say?

Let's see.

And then two nights ago, I read all of Biden security people.

Can you imagine?

National defense people. And they said,

gee, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack from the north because that's the most

vulnerable spot. I said, wait a minute. You know, Hezbollah is very smart. They're

all very smart. The press doesn't like when they say, I'm

there. I said that President Xi of China, 1.4 billion people, he controls it with an iron fist.

I said, he's a very smart man. They killed me the next day. I said he was smart. What am I going to say?

But Hezbo's they're very smart. And they have a national

defense minister or somebody saying, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack us from the north.

So the following morning they attacked. They might not have been doing it, but if you

listen to this jerk, you would attack from the north because he said that's our weak spot.

About 15 seconds later it was all over and we did it.

But I'll never forget.

I'll never forget that BB Net and Yahoo let us down.

That was a very terrible thing.

I will say that.

And so when I see sometimes the intelligence, you talk about the intelligence or you talk about

some of the things that went wrong over the last week.

They've got to straighten it out because they're fighting potentially a very big force.

They're fighting potentially Iran.

And when they have people saying the wrong things, everything they say is being digested by these

people because they're vicious and they're smart and boy are they vicious

because nobody's ever seen the kind of sight that we've seen. Nobody's ever seen

it. But they cannot play games. So we were disappointed by that, very disappointed, but we did the job ourselves and it was absolute precision, magnificent, beautiful job.

And then, uh, baby tried to take credit for it.

So he's talking about the killing of Soleimani here. That didn't make me feel too good but that's all right. So yeah, this is, well

first of all, it's clear this is not Trump's intention. He is not praising Hezbollah. he's still super Zionist, but he's doing the thing where

he's saying, you know, the enemy is smart and you guys are, well it doesn't really matter

what his intention is at all because in a sense DeSantis is right in the strict sense that Trump is criticizing Israel.

It doesn't matter what his intentions are, what the reason is. He is criticizing Israel at this

point. Expressing that he has independence from the Israeli political establishment and the Israel lobby effectively,

it seems like. And it seems at this point that Trump's Zionism is in free fall. If Trump truly is

a Zionist right now, but in a way that's independent of the Israel lobby,

that means he can be like this, he can turn on them like this, you understand?

So, um, also, it doesn't matter what his intentions are,

because guess what's gonna happen?

If Trump is gonna, if Trump is gonna be attacked by DeSantis

and DeSantis wants to draw the red line

that it's about Zionism,

I guarantee you in the Maga grassroots, there's going

to be some Q&N people or something else who are basically going to just say, you know

what, let's start being critical of Israel because DeSantis is with Israel, the whole media is with Israel,

they're attacking Trump for this.

You know what I'm saying, there's a possibility there.

I'm not saying this is going to happen, I'm just saying it's a possibility.

So this is a way for Maga to be to lose and ditch the Zionism.

So yeah, I hope I'm not I'm not holding my breath but it's relevant to what I want to talk about today about internal responses to Israel

and the United States, how this is a partisan divide between apparently left and right, although it seems to be changing

in many ways.

And I want to talk about things like this, because I think that a big mistake is being made

in terms of how people have a cognitive mapping of this conflict and how they understand this conflict.

There's also more things that Trump said, which I'd like to, uh, I'd like to get into.

Before we get on the Mario an awful space

That iron fist I said he's a very smart man. They killed me the next day. Oh

All of Biden security people can you?

Okay. This is just the Santos can you imagine national

defense so there's not much more from that clip besides that trum.

Trump claims that he does claim that during the operation to kill Nantayahu

Israel backed out at the last moment and they went ahead with it anyway.

Trump still wants to take credit for it. We obviously know this was John Bolton and the neo-cons.

But Trump is Trump. He's but he's free falling right now and that's a good thing for us

he's free falling that means

Maga can be more influenced.

If they're still Maga, you know, that's the thing.

Jay Summit, let's go!

Holy shit!

Let's go!

You guys know,

Jay Summit works very closely with Ibrahim

on our glorious, beautiful second channel on the

YouTube. A lot of those bangers you're seeing that's also Jay Summit's work so

keep that in mind, all right?

Guy's very good at what he does.

And that second channel is going to blow up, okay?

Mark my words.

It's going to blow up.

One viral thing is all it's going to take.

Thank you, Arc.

Let's go! Let's go! Let's go!

Let's go!

I hope Mario Noffo doesn't end his space, because there's some things I want to get to and cover.

So we're at the, I don't know, I'm losing track of time,

third or fourth day of the conflict. Hezbollah has not gotten into the conflict yet. The

main thing that we're witnessing right now is the atrocity propaganda, which I'm a little conflicted as far as how I should be paying attention

to it, because my gut instinct is just like, this is bullshit, I'm not even going to pay

it any bother because in a year or in a few months

Everyone's going to realize it was bullshit right

I could sit here and be like oh my god

I can't believe

I mean even people in my life are telling me like how is this not how are you not outraged that they're just lying this much

And I think I've adopted

a very kind of like Buddhist or I don't know what you'd call it, a very eastern or oriental

mentality where I'm just kind of like indifferent to the injustice of the lie because it was the single thing that

raised my blood pressure for the Russia Ukraine conflict for an entire year. So I've been so

desensitized by it that I just like to focus on the Tao, you know, I like to focus on the way of

things.

As in, I know this is bullshit, but the bullshit will clear on its own, just like a river

flows, and I don't have to pay it anymore.

I already see the end of the tunnel here.

It's a bunch of bullshit.

It'll get cleared up.

Don't worry.

The truth will be revealed in due time.

And when I say due time, it's already getting revealed, right?

I mean, yeah, of it's already getting revealed right I mean yeah and it's

nothing new it's nothing new I'm really used to it like growing up in my life I

used to hear all sorts of crazy things and I think the main thing stems from the dehumanization

you're seeing of Hamas. Confusing Hamas for ISIS, confusing them for... There's nothing

wrong with the Taliban, but confusing them for the Taliban. It's just ignorance, right? The

assumption that Hamas are like these savage pre-modern

beasts who are uncivilized and not privy to modern technology or modern culture and are just

like acting completely barbarically,

like something you'd see straight out of a movie.

I think that's where most of this is coming from.

Like for example, I constantly see people say like,

oh, these pink-haired Western leftists

who are supporting Palestine, Hamas would behead them. And it's like, in

spirit, yes, but literally would Hamas behead them? No. Hamas would tell them, Hamas would say, okay, you're a foreigner, your ways

are strange and I don't understand them. But if you and my land, you have to cover up,

here's a sweater, here's a dress. Put it on.

And we don't tolerate any public displays of obscenity.

That's what they, that is honestly what their response would be.

It would not be killing or, you know, people have a really stupid idea of how, I mean,

especially Hezbollah, if you know how modern Lebanon is, and if you think Hezbollah is going

around and forcing like some crazy, strict, enforcing

religious codes so strictly, no, it's culture, it's organic culture.

And yeah, their culture is different than ours, but the idea that they're just kind of like irrational. I

mean I grew up hearing that Hezbollah was the same as al-Qaeda and Hamas are

the same as al-Qaeda and that every it's all terrorism and all every kind of

terrorism is the same

and you know I'm used to the lies is what I'm trying to say you know I'm used to

this kind of looking at the some bearded guy speaking a different language

a very angry and passionate and it's just people being like oh yeah

that's just you know that guy just wants to kill all of us that's not true

Hamas doesn't want to kill everyone living in Israel they don't want to kill

most people living in Israel they don't want to kill civilians living in Israel. They don't want to kill most people living in Israel. They don't want to kill

civilians living in Israel. They don't really want to kill in general, but they are, what they do want

is to fulfill goals, right?

They want to achieve the liberation of Palestine and the overthrow of the Israeli state to that ends. Um, whether you agree with that or not is immaterial.

They're not, but you can't just say they're beasts and savages.

You just want to murder everyone.

If that was true, that story I told you yesterday of that settler woman, and not saying settler as a

loaded term, like a literal settler, right?

She was on camera saying, yeah, they came into my house. They said they weren't going to harm anyone, they didn't.

They were very polite. They asked for a banana.

And I said yes, they asked permission.

It's like, and then they left. They didn't harm anyone.

I can't confirm the claims of that they're executing civilians. I don't know where it's coming from.

I could be wrong, right? But it would just would surprise me a lot.

It would surprise me a lot. If Hamas just started taking civilians and shooting them straight up for no reason

massacring them.

That would shock me, you know, I, but I don't, I haven't seen any evidence of it. For example that when they claim

All they're killing all these people. Where is the evidence, you know? I haven't seen any.

I haven't seen any. I haven't seen any.

So yeah, I think a lot of people get confused.

But the lies that are going around, I mean, look, here's a development that's pretty

crazy actually.

This is pretty crazy. This is an example, right?

And then, oh God, I have to talk about the philosophy stuff because

this stupid-ass land-back nonsense is coming back.

And I have to address it.

Okay, so Biden issued a crazy statement.

Okay, he, um, this is fucking like, holy shit. This is if you don't believe the internet has taken

over all reality, thank you, what is, gay, what is, what is this name, or goip, okay. See don't see I don't choose goip. I can't believe I'm like roasting someone

who just gave subscribe. Thank you so much dude. Appreciate it.

Um, this is just how I am, I guess.

I'm just a mean, mean guy.

Thank you, Anonymous.

Hammers is the most democratic military in the Middle East.

Thank you for the five, appreciate you.

Uh, let's... By the five, appreciate you. Let's...

By the way, Hamas, anyone who talks about Hamas is just wasting your time.

If it was, if there wasn't Hamas, it would be someone else.

Okay?

They clear...

Hamas are the ones who want to fight, fight, fight.

Well, yeah, that's what the Gaza people want.

So yeah, that's what they want.

They want to fight.

Whoever's going to be the best at fighting, they're going to choose.

I never really thought that I would see and have confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children.

I never thought I'd ever... anyway, I, uh... Didn't the people that the US and Israel funded in Syria do that, by the way?

But there are countries in the region that are trying to be of some help, including Arab

nations.

Jordan.

Jordan, I don't mean to be like straight up racist here.

But the king of Jordan, is he Arab? Is the king of Jordan Arab? I mean,

Jordan. What is Jordan do it?

Okay? If you know, you know, but what the fuck is Jordan doing?

Wait, I can't even say this shit, holy fuck.

Three, oh God.

Okay.

Well, actually, ah.

Can I say this?

Um, like, I don't know.

I don't want to get banned from Jordan. But at this rate, I'll probably be banned from Jordan anyway.

Fuck it, I'm saying it.

Jordan, what are you guys doing with that king you have? That guy is...

That guy's a white boy. I said it. I said it. The King of Jordan is a white boy.

The king of Jordan is a white boy.

The king of Jordan is a white boy. There you go, I said it.

Dude's a white boy, straight up.

Nothing else.

All right?

Literally, his mom is like British.

He's like intermarried with the British royal family.

I'm not even fucking kidding.

His mom is British.

He's literally a white boy.

The king of Jordan.

Dude's a white boy.

Literally just some British guy who's king of Jordan.

All right, yeah.

Straight up white boy.

Trying to be some help.

So, uh, anyway. Yeah, he's Oxford educated, and I heard his speech the other day, which is what made me real

because his Arabic accent is horrible.

Now listen, I don't speak fluent Arabic.

But what I do know in Arabic, I pretty sure sounds right.

And I even have like a kind of an accent in my normal English voice, right?

But the King of Jordan, when I heard him speak Arabic,

dude straight up sounded like a

fucking interpreter.

Like dude, that dude is not an Arab.

I'm sorry, he's not.

He didn't, that his Arabic don't even sound right.

Doesn't even sound organic or nothing.

Listen to it if you don't believe me.

I never really thought that I would.

Haqaim's dad.

Ah, that's good.

I love that. All right, so Biden claims that's good. I love that.

All right, so Biden claims that he's confirmed photos of babies being beheaded by terrorists.

But the White House had to issue a statement which said that this was not confirmed.

Clarified that U.S. officials and the president have not seen pictures or confirmed such reports independently.

It's just coming from Nanyahu's spokesman and media reports from Israel.

If you're curious, again, Max Blumenthal talked about it yesterday, we covered it yesterday,

but I'll just, very briefly, um, very briefly, just kind of refresh your memory, right?

The gray zone kind of was fully on this.

The source of the claim that they were beheading babies or killing babies was a guy named David Bed Zion,

who was an extremist who incited violent riots by calling to wipe out Palestinians early this year.

And we can actually like briefly look at the article. Um,

pff...

Oh my god.

Okay, this is a Facebook post.

All right.

Thank God I'm not going on Facebook.

We walk door after door, we killed a lot of the terrorists.

We are stronger than them. They are aggressive. They are very bad.

They cut head of children, cut head of women.

So this is him.

This is just this guy lying straight up.

No ambiguity, straight up just lying.

Let me see what I can show this to you.

This is where it comes from.

We work door after door. We kill a lot of the terrorists.

We are stronger than them.

They are aggressive.

They are very bad.

They cut head of children, cut head of women.

But we are stronger than them.

He straight up said they are very bad, they cut off head of children.

He straight upset that without even laughing. So he's leader of something called the Apocalyptic Temple Movement, the Temple Movement.

These are people who want to demolish the El-XA mosque and rebuild the temple, you know.

So yeah, this would be like a crazy guy in the US who leads like a crazy church saying nonsense and people taking at face value without even questioning

Without even questioning like the possibility that could it could be wrong, you know, it could be bullshit

Right, so yeah, that's that's what we're dealing with there. That's the beheading story.

And what I'm trying to say is it's fucking crazy

because, okay, they ended the space.

Fuck!

They ended the space. That's okay.

That was just giving me more room to talk about the thing I want to talk about today.

But, um, no, no, the insane thing is that the, the fucking president of the US is repeating this nonsense lie.

I get it, the lie is really bad, it's taking a hold of the whole country.

I'm sure your neighbors, co-workers your family members

Are talking to you about this crazy story

And you know justice doesn't always come you know the thing I always learn justice is never immediate.

Sometimes you have to wait.

And sometimes a just position is just telling people, hey, wait and see.

Let's let time tell.

I don't believe this, but don't take my word for it.

I'm sure you even you will see this was a lie in a few months or a year.

But time will tell if that was true, we don't know. Say that to people, right?

Say, but that can't justify us going to war.

That doesn't justify going to war.

See, that's all you have to say. Okay, so Hezbollah issued a statement recently regarding the aircraft carrier.

Yeah, Mario Noffo's space is over.

Shit!

They said, sending aircraft carriers... Shit.

They said, sending aircraft carriers to the region with the aim of raising enemy morale, reveals the weakness of the Zionist military machine.

Wasn't that your first thought?

Because that was my first thought.

If you need aircraft carriers, the odds are, sorry, if you need the

U.S. to send an aircraft carrier, odds are you're desperate. And this is not going to be

good for you. Like that to me was very, very clear and obvious.

The fact that US has to do this means Israel is very vulnerable.

So what we're talking about, am I crazy for thinking this?

If this war is taken to its full conclusion, this will be the end of Israel.

Will it be the killing of every Israeli? No.

No.

No.

Will it be the forcible removal of every Israeli?

No. I don't think that's going to happen either.

But will it be the end of the state of Israel? Yes. And also it's going to be a huge fucking, it's going to be a revolution in the region,

a complete reshaping of the borders of the Middle East. And you know what?

If this conflict is taking to its full conclusion, it's going to be a region-wide conflict going

beyond it. This will be the trigger of it. But this will go beyond Israel. This will be

all this will be a war you're going to see that no one even expects to happen, right?

Because the Middle East region is a ticking time bomb. I'm sure you understand Sykes-Pico, the boundaries and borders that were

drawn. It's like China's warlord period, pretty much. The nation states of the Middle East

are all artificial in a sense. All of them are.

I mean, because I try to, I'm thinking about this myself as someone of Lebanese descent.

And I ask myself the question, why is someone who's Lebanese, when I was

growing, why was the Palestine thing so fundamental to my understanding of the world? Like,

why does that hit so close to home? And then I, the same thing with Yemenis, and they're all the world. Like why does that hit so close to home? And then I

the same thing with Yemenis and they're all the way for they're not even the

Levant and then I look at other Muslims from Pakistan. I look at Kurds,

Pakistanis, Iranians, hell even Indonesians, everybody's got the same, somewhat of the same thing going.

Maybe not Indonesia, I don't know.

But definitely, Afghanistan, everybody's got the same thing going.

And it's like, you know why that is?

Because we all know deep down

that all of these borders are fake,

you know, in the Middle East.

And that we're actually, there's no difference between us.

There's no difference between me and a Palestinian.

I mean, I'm ethnically speaking, you know what I'm saying?

There's no difference between a Lebanese and a Palestinian.

There's no difference between an Iraqi and a...

There are differences between tribes.

In any given country in the Middle East, of course there's differences between tribes.

But at the fundamental level of the state, there's

no difference.

No border or territory or boundary can really fundamentally separate these people. And that's the truth. There's no fundamental difference. No border can separate them.

I mean, feuds can separate people, but not as a border, a modern border. Remember, a modern border, I should get into

this in my lecture. Borders between countries are not just I'm different than you. It's this

is the absolute line beyond which I will die for to defend. This is the line that defines who I

am, my ultimate existence, my ultimate identity, this is the line defining that,

right? So this is what I mean. Deep down in the Middle East, no one believes

in the borders we have. Nobody does. These lines are all fake. And Israel is seen as the

number one line maker, in a way, right?

Thank you, Anonymous.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Palestine, Pakistan, Malaysia, what we have in common is critical race theory.

Wasn't expecting that.

But I'm kind of really upset at how recklessly people are comparing this to the American Indian

removal and the whole history of displacement of indigenous Americans, putting indigenous

quotations because it's just such a meaningless

word like it doesn't refer to anything specific but the Palestine issue so

fundamental because it's a regional thing.

It's not just a regional thing.

You know, it's like nobody believes in the borders in the Middle East and the borders aren't

real.

They're not real.

How can you, what is the, someone tell me this.

What is the basis of the border between Iraq and Syria?

I don't know. Do you know the map of Iraq and Syria? If you understand the geography of the Middle East, it looks very weird. There's just this big line, why? You know, why? I don't know. Just cause.

I just felt like it.

You know?

There's no fucking reason for it.

It's completely arbitrary. I mean, it'd be one thing if these were borders settled

by a war. If they were warring all the time, they're okay, this is our boundary. We conclude

that because, but that's not the case. It's just, some Europeans drew up a map, some colonial European powers

drew up a map, it's really the British Empire, they drew up a map and they said, okay, this

is the borders and that's it. What, that's, this is like in Africa, you know, there's a reason in Africa why all those Africans

said we're all South African when it came to fighting apartheid.

There's a reason they all were invested in that, because they don't believe in their borders.

So I'm telling you it's similar in the Middle East.

The borders are not real.

Nobody believes in them.

And why the Palestine conflict is central to that fact is because this is the most fundamental

case of artificial borders and territories being imposed on people to the detriment directly of their way of living.

Now, the Iraqi borders are not directly to the detriment of the local way of living.

The Syrian borders aren't. They're not directly that, right?

But in Palestine, these borders are what cut across people's

fucking water lines or electricity lines, right? These borders are what prevent people

even from having a normal fucking way of life. So it's so fundamental because it's a,

it's part of the consciousness,

the regional consciousness that when all is said and done,

these artificial states are an impediment to reconciling the traditional way of life in

the region with modernity, with the modern age, right?

That ultimately speaking, the Palestinians epitomize this kind of persecution or this kind

of impossibility of maintaining a normal way of life within the framework of Sykes-Pico.

Even your homes are taken from you, you're completely displaced and uprooted.

It's a fucking disaster.

So that's why it's so fundamental, you know?

It's a regional thing. It's not just Palestine. It's a whole regional thing.

Why do you think people in Yemen are like

we will go with our sandals to go and fight in Palestine? Because think about it

from a materialist perspective. What do Yemenis have to do with that? They're all the way in Yemen. What do

they have to do with it? Is it just because they share an identity? Is it just because they

share the same religion? No. It's even more than that, you know?

It's the fact... even more than that, you know?

It's the fact that when Yemenis see what's going on in Palestine, they relate to it.

They see that as the most central thing

of their own existential predicament in the modern world. They look at that and they say this is, this is the best summary and the best example of what we face here in Yemen.

What we've lost, right?

So, this is the awakening consciousness of the region.

It's a regional awakening.

This isn't simply about Israel coming in, committing injustices, and then the situation

needing to be rectified.

That's not, that's not, this is beyond Israel, is what I'm trying to say.

This is about a regional awakening of these, I don't know what you want to call it, the Islamic civilizations putting

their foot on the ground and announcing their existence in the modern world.

That they have something to say, they have something to be, they have something to offer to modernity.

They have a statement to make.

Just like there was a European modernity, just like there was the Russian modernity,

just like there was a Chinese modernity,

the people of the Middle East are saying,

we have our own response to modernity. We have our own way of relating our existence to that,

and broadcasting our existence to the world.

We have our own statement to make.

We have our own eschatology to fulfill.

That's the best way to put it. We have our own

civilizational eschatology to fulfill. We have our own

journey, if you want to put it that way. And it's similar to why do you, the most apt comparison I can make when

it comes to the Palestinian struggle is to the Chinese. The Chinese always

refer to the century of humiliation. The Chinese century of humiliation was the

Chinese napka. That was their napka. That was their Israel. Their Israel was

Japan. It was the European powers. it was the warlord era, right?

And when China stood up, right, to overcome that.

That was China's way of saying, we have something to say.

We have a statement to make.

We have our own take on responding to modernity literally responding as in a dialectic right

We have our own

Sublation of modernity and the world will bear witness to our awakening, to the awakening of our civilization.

We exist. That was the statement of the Chinese. We exist, right?

So something happened similarly in the Middle East beginning, it didn't begin

here, but part of it was the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Arab-Israeli conflict starting in 48.

That's what awakened the people in the Middle East. From the

Arab-Israeli conflict, you got Bothism and you got Nasser. You got Nasserism.

The first form of like modern consciousness as it pertains to the civilizations.

Ultimately these failed because they were imposing the paradigm of the nation state.

So they failed. They failed to articulate the realities, right?

Then came Iran 1979 and that was another awakening. They call it the Islamic

Awakening, right? Now my prediction for the region is there has to be a third awakening because the Islamic awakening did learn,

it didn't just abandon nationalism, it absorbed aspects of Nasser and the nationalism.

For example, Hezbollah, you can call them nationalists in some

sense, right? The third awakening, I think, will have to happen.

Um, and... happen. And, you know, biased as I am, I think the third awakening will be read.

When I say it will be read, mean, we'll be a communist awakening.

But who I don't who am I to say that? You know, but I am a communist. So, you know, that's like what I believe.

But if it doesn't happen, it doesn't, that's just, that's just my opinion, I guess, right?

Not a return to the old communism, but a new synthesis of communism, which learns from the nationalism and learns from the Islamic

awakening and synthesizes them, just like China synthesized, the Republican nationalism

and the Boxer Rebellion and stuff, just like the

Mousetung thought, right? So this is my view as a communist.

Something like Gaddafi? No, explicitly communism, right? Because I want to, I mean, ideologically speaking, I don't know if this is a time to even talk about this, but ideologically speaking,

I support, I mean I support the Mukalma in spirit ideologically, and I believe they

are more advanced than any communist forces on earth in many ways.

But there are, Numukama faces obstacles and limitations, which I'm not sure you can go without some kind of, you know, it's like a primary and secondary contradiction if you're in China

You fight with the KMT

Of course you do against the Japanese invaders

Sun Yat Sen is the Sun Yat Sen was the Humeini of China, right?

But there's also a secondary contradiction and I have no doubt that secondary contradiction will bear fruition in history. I have no doubt about that. Okay. But this, but this, I mean, this conflict in the, I mean, think about it like this.

I was in a very contemplated mood today, right?

So it got me thinking about a lot of different things.

And the contemplative mood that I was in.

Think about it like this, okay? Give me a second. Think about it like this. Why does this conflict divide

the world so much.

Israel versus...

This is the one thing that dominates everything.

Not even just because it's on the news right now, but it's like, look, Israel population,

No Buana, let's go! Let's fucking go!

Let's fucking go!

Let's fucking go!

Israel's population is 9 million.

The Palestinian population within Israel is 5 million.

Now, granted, the Palestinian diaspora population is approximately 7 million.

So this is... is approximately 7 million.

So this is not justified by the population size,

the significance of this conflict, is not justified by the size of the population,

just of Israel and Palestine.

So why is it so central, right?

I think it's central because it has acquired the significance of this kind of absolute threshold of Western

modernity, just an absolute threshold. Now Ukraine was a threshold of Western

modernity. There's plenty of thresholds where Western

modernity must face forces beyond, right? This was Nazi Germany, by the way. Nazi Germany

was Western modernity facing the threshold of beyond, right? Now Israel, Israel is a kind of

absolute threshold of Western modernity which which centralizes questions as fundamental of what is national identity, what is the basis

of a state, what is our connection to land, what is our connection to land? What is our connection to land?

What is our connection to,

what glues us together as a people?

Right?

Um. And I think existentially, America is fundamental here, right?

But Israel epitomizes the criminality of the criminal excesses, I think, of Anglo-Saxon modernity.

I think that's how I would put it.

Israel epitomizes the criminal excesses of Anglo-Saxon modernity, but also on the metaphysical plane.

What do I mean by metaphysical plane?

I'm using that word very loosely here.

I mean to say South Africa was similar.

South Africa epitomized the criminal excesses of

Anglo-Saxon modernity and by criminal excesses I mean the ways in which

this type of modernity is incompatible with human life,

and which therefore, when faced with human life,

responds by persecuting it, by punishing it,

by keeping it down, by making sure

that it can't breathe and become what it is.

Right?

This is what I mean by criminal excess.

So Israel represents the criminal excess of Anglo-Saxon modernity,

but given a supreme metaphysical significance.

Now what is the metaphysical significance

that I'm talking about?

To be clear, right? Well, the religious element is definitely there.

And you see this with the evangelical movement in the US and its relation with Israel,

you know, the kind of myth-making about Israel and the eschatological implications.

Escatology is very important in that regard, which is ironic a little bit because you see,

Judaism as their tradition is very, very, very skeptical of claims to the status

of Messiah.

The Orthodox Judaism does not, will not accept someone coming and saying, I am the Messiah.

I mean, that's, that's how it's sharply distinguished from Christianity and even Islam to an extent, right?

So there have been various kinds. and even Islam to an extent, right?

So there have been various kinds of claims to Messiahhood in the history of Judaism,

all of which were considered heretical.

And if you want to expound Zionism in religious terms, it's

also, if it's expounded in religious terms, and it doesn't originate as religious, but

if you were to translate it in religious terms, it would be also a heretical movement claiming this is

this is the Messiah we are building the third temple literally right and returning to Israel, where Israel and Judaism was

a metaphysical concept.

So actually going to the actual geographic landmass that corresponded with what was in the

Bible is like what they said. It's like

immanentizing the Escaton, right? Which is how that guy, forget his name, described

all the totalitarian movements of the 20th century as like Gnostic in nature, right? They want to imitize the Escaton and literally create,

by direct modern scientific material means, some kind of prophesized ends of a total ideology and so on and so on.

Anyway, so it's not coming from Judaism, but it is a site in which the metaphysical conflict of modernity with the eschatologies of traditional religion

are being borne out.

On all fronts, so in Judaism itself, the Orthodox Jews who are opposed to Zionism, what's

their beef with it? Their beef with it is that this is a debasement of the Jewish eschatology.

This is a complete abomination. It's a heretical,

wicked deviation from the Jewish kind of eschatological view of how the Jewish religion conceives the relation of man to the end of times, right?

Literally trying to create it directly instead of recognizing it's something more transcendent.

Like, I remember there was a rabbi who described the

third temple, and what does it mean to rebuild the third temple? And he said, the

third temple is not literally being rebuilt by our hand. The third temple is

something transcendent. When we do good in the world and when we

correspond with, when our life corresponds with the Torah, we are built, we are in this

sense building the third temple.

This is how we're building it.

This is how we're building the foundation.

So it's a more kind of spiritual concept, right, to give you an idea.

Now at the level of the Islamic religion, the eschatological significance is very clear.

Because of the Al-Aqsa mosque, right, and its significance within Islam. But also, in terms of Christianity, it's beyond the evangelical idea that Muslims and Jews kill each other and then Christ comes

back.

I'd have to think about that one so hope.

Put that on a shelf, right?

I'd have to return to that to think about it more clearly.

But also in Islam, I think we are witness, what Israel really is, is a confrontation between

the, how would I put it, the Leviathan of Modernity with the Islamic view of the world, right?

In the Islamic view, the notion of a fixed territory

with absolute boundaries is radically alien, right?

The Islamic view views the earth as kind of smooth and continuous, like DeLuz would describe, right?

A smooth space.

Because it was founded by nomads.

It was a religion of nomads, right?

So Israel is seen as an obstruction upon the smooth space, the smooth, natural, and organic continuum of the land, right?

It's an obstruction.

It's man-building something saying, this is absolute.

This is completely like, this is like a,

this is heretical, not just heretical, sorry, this is idolatrous. You're saying that you're God basically.

That you're, you can create something you have absolute certainty of with the beginning and an end.

Obviously this is something about this is disastrous from an Islamic perspective.

And this is where they're directly, it's an internal struggle of Islamic civilization.

Because you ask, well, Muslim countries also have borders, you're right.

This is why it's not just an outer jihad, where it's Muslims fighting the Jews.

This is the most stupid rendition of the conflict

is when they say it's Muslims versus Jews.

This is not a conflict between Muslims and Jews.

This is a conflict between Muslims and their own

inability to respond to modernity. It's a conflict of, it's an inner, it's an internal conflict of how can these two,

how can modernity be reconciled with Islamic civilization?

That's what the conflict is about.

And Palestine is central to it because that is literally where people are being persecuted by this.

It's like a direct confrontation. People simply trying to live their organic way of life, they have

their olive trees and their small gardens, they have their homes that the home

is so sacred and fundamental in the Middle East civilization. It's something eternal. It's not like,

put it this way, there's a lot of sentimental value attached to the home.

This is the place of your dignity and your honor.

The home is everything, right?

Along with the olive trees and so on and so on.

It's the foundation of being a human being.

So when this is directly something being violated and obstructed,

that is kind of a complete rendition of the conflict at hand.

Like that is what makes it absolute.

When people can't fucking just live their lives as they had been in the past,

when you, when you know, when you're, when your Jiddo's house is being bulldozed,

that means your grandfather's house.

This is where all the family comes together and so on.

When you witness that being just demolished,

there's something traumatic about that, right? It's unthinkable,

it's inconceivable. You know, people, liberals, I don't care what type of Zionist it is, but all kinds of

Zionists will always kind of look for solutions based on a problem they don't understand.

They'll say, why not just accept this line and this boundary?

And it's like, the reason they will never accept any boundary is because they don't even

accept their own boundaries. You know what I'm saying? They will never accept

any boundary. They will never accept a two-state solution, a three-state

solution. It will never be possible because you're effectively saying,

how can you be bribed in order to give up your right to existence?

When I say right to existence, I don't just mean the right to biologically subsist.

I mean the right to the existence of being what you are at the level of civilization, right?

The right to exist as you are, as you are

meaning all of your culture, your civilization, your da sign, if you want to put it

in Heidegarian terms and so on, and so on. That's what's meant by the right to exist. And in defense

of that right to exist, these people in the Middle East will die. They will quite literally

give up their biological subsistence to pursue their right to exist. See existence and

biological subsistence are not the same thing. You can live, you can be put in a

fucking hospital and be brain dead and you can you can be living, right?

But you're not existing. You understand? Or you can be an individual and you can go to Starbucks and consume and and be airy-fairy and you can go to rave consume and be airy fairy

and you can go to rave concerts and do all these things.

But you're not existing.

You're not existing.

You have no existence.

You're like a fucking animal.

You're like a fucking animal, you're like a caged rat, who's just going through the motions

of a life instead of truly living one.

Because in order to exist, you have to fulfill not just a standard necessary in order to subsist at the biological level.

You need to fulfill a meaning and a purpose and a place.

That's the most important one. You need to fulfill a place. That's the most important one.

You need to fulfill a place in the world.

And in order to fulfill a place in the world,

you have to be situated in an organic,

civilizational or social context.

You have to be something beyond yourself.

You have to dwell within something that gives you purpose and gives you meaning and defines your existence, right? This is my way of life,

this is why I'm doing it, this is the honor that I'm defending, and this is the whole of what I am.

That's what it means to exist, to have an existence.

So those who are coming from the modern liberal perspective, who are trying to look for solutions

to this conflict, don't understand what this conflict is about.

This conflict is not about materially satisfying your wants and needs.

Like, it's not just about having enough wealth

or having enough consumer goods or having enough, it's not about that. It's about having an existence.

Let me show you a speech by Hassan Nasrallah, which was given a long time ago which which will get which will show you

exactly what I'm talking about here it'll it'll show you exactly what I'm

talking about here it is here it is thought it was deleted so this was a OG speech

from decades ago this is what OG speech from decades ago.

This is what the height of his charisma as a leader. I'll show this.

Today, they to tell all the thee to catebun to the Hezbollah and they told him to him

it. And they'll tell you,

to this mawaka, and you their aman.

Takelow on this mawaka,

and will tape on the kite of the theyarh.

This is not the order serious.

In the television today, they're all their today.

Hezbullahs their treat their theirahab.

We're not a problem.

The theirher, that they mean,

their mcama, the defaua the the the umm, the dame the Shaulstini,

the dame defauam theamat and the um.

We're tel them,

and you're there are sahidoon the the the the thea

our l'oeujae and our thei-or, our disar, and our thefaul and our

Mujahidunah and all who the theombun this toward.

We're to them,

the the a theabas the Abbas the Abbas the theybla,

are they thea to give us the their the Sahat Karbala. Are they theunn their aman?

And the Palaistan

no a their

the Palaestin

no am I am

Mujahideen L'en L'estan theiii the the

the tha the

the the Kutu's la their the curse of God be upon you and your safety.

And this is what the Western mind doesn't understand. This is what they don't understand.

So he's talking about they were giving Hezbollah the offer.

They will cross you off the terrorist list.

You can enjoy a free status, just give up the Palestinians.

Stop fighting for them. Now if you listen to his speech, the Western

mind, the leftist mind, may translate this as him saying, I am just empathetic.

I'm just morally high-grounding, right? I'm pretending I'm above what's material and it's just

morality, that's it. But you're abstracting it from its context if you're doing

that. He's not saying we're just going to do this for Palestinians as a favor

because we're so good.

He's saying they are us.

How can we have safety and they don't have safety?

There's no difference between us.

We're the same thing.

We have, our subjectivity is not the individual consumer who's safe, who's having

an eye. That's not our existence. That's not who we are. Our existence is more than that.

Your safety cannot satisfy our existence because you can't

guarantee the safety of what? And he talks about things that sound metaphysical,

right? The Al-Axa Mosque. What does he mean by the safety of the Al-Aksa mosque? He means a metaphysical

safety. He means the liberation of the Islamic civilizations or the Middle Eastern peoples

from the yoke of Anglo-Saxon modernity. That's exactly what he means. And ultimately his words,

what's driving his words, if you want to expound this into geopolitical terms,

what's driving his speech and his words? Thank you so much blackback.

The American mind should understand it.

He who would trade security for liberty deserves neither.

Yeah, but this is even more than that, right?

Because, no, that is, no, no, that is a good way to translate it in a sense.

But that begs the question, liberty for what? Because they have a what?

And this is what I'm getting to. What's driving these words from him is ultimately a striving

and a passion for regional integration for a united Middle East of a civilization state.

It's your best guess is mine as far as what that would look like.

But that's what this is about. It's about a civilization state of the Middle East.

And if you want to know what that's going to look like, I only say look at the past for clues

because the Middle East has always been civilization states

culminating in what, the Ottomans and the Sophoids, right? So is

it a return of those or is it a return of a mixture of those two or I don't

know I couldn't tell you. That's for the people of the Middle East to decide

themselves. But what's animating this kind of the Middle East to decide themselves.

But what's animating this kind of passion that you're seeing from Nasrallah, what's

animating it isn't leftist style moral grandstanding.

It's a very concrete struggle for existence. It's a struggle for an existential predicament of everyone

in the Middle East.

And a voice that is not being heard. in the Middle East.

And a voice that is not being heard.

What is the voice not being heard?

It's the voice of a people who have no recognition in the modern age. They have no recognition. They have no existence.

They're just backward. I mean, look at how Hezbollah and Hamas are portrayed by the media.

Or the Palestinians are portrayed by the media.

They're beheading babies, they're doing...

They don't have recognition. They're not even seen as human.

You know? Their way of life is not respected by the modern world. Their values are not respected. Therefore

they have no dignity. That's why he talks about dignity in the speech. It's not just an

empty phrase. It means something concrete. And if you want to be a materialist

that concrete is a civilizational regional state. That's what this is about. This is about a fight for a very particular

civilization. And I'm this is my understanding from the perspective of

multipolarity, right? It's a fight for a polarity. This is a pole, a polarity,

animating and driving the passions of the people in this region. This is what

they're fighting and they're dying for. I mean it's literally a pole driving and attracting them.

They say, well, it's religion.

Yes, of course, religion, but religion

is part of that civilization.

You understand?

The civilization and the religion are continuous.

Religion is not an abstractly contrived set of principles and beliefs.

Religion is a type of feeling, you know.

It's a specific form of feeling belief from the heart, not from the head from the heart.

You understand?

And the way of life and the civilization which corresponds to that is very particular and specific, you know?

And this is what they're fighting for.

When people say, oh, their religious fanatics, they just want to impose their religion on everyone.

That's not true.

The religious belief they have is also existential, right?

It's also about how they make sense of their world and what they are themselves.

So it's also a form of self-consciousness, you know?

It's not about, see, because the Western mind brackets things into two from the Cartesian dualism stuff, right?

It's like, on the one hand hand you have religion, which is this pure

ethereal spirit, and on the other hand you have, you know, um, you have the blind force of nature,

which is where nationality is and where races, but in this case you don't have that dualism, right?

The spiritual and the material are of the same essence.

They're not separated in, uh, this is why attempts to bribe Hezbollah and other people in the Middle East have failed.

It's failed because they don't see these things as separate.

They don't see the satisfaction of your material needs and your spiritual needs as separate.

Those are the same thing for them, right?

Like, for example, it's like if I drink water, I'm satisfying my thirst.

But, is that all I'm satisfying my thirst. But,

is that all I'm doing?

I'm satisfying my thirst for a reason.

What's that reason?

It's about why I'm living,

what I'm living for, and therefore,

what would I die for? And this is why they have a different view of

death. They are, they, this is why they're willing to die because they have an understanding of life in

terms of existence. So they have something to die for.

You know they claim Israelis love life and the Arabs love death. It's like okay but there's a reason for that, right?

That's because the Israelis are just Western liberal.

It's just Western liberalism.

That's it.

They have nothing to die for.

Except shaking their ass on Tick-Tock, like trying to say.

And look, you don't have to agree with me.

You don't have to agree with me that this is good or this is bad.

Forget that normative terms. I'm just trying to say, anyone who's approaching

this conflict, not taking into, not taking this into account, you're not going to understand.

Oh, why are the Palestinians so irrational? Why won't they just take a deal so they can live? Because

biologically subsisting is not enough. Because it's not enough. Because that's not

what they are. Because they will not submit to your regime. Israel is the regime of

the British Empire and now the unipolar empire.

And you're saying, what is your price to submit to this regime? And what are they

saying? They're saying, there's no price because it will never happen because we

would rather die than submit to your regime.

We would rather die than submit to your regime of pornography, of nihilism, of madness, of insanity, of LGBTQ, of this and that they would rather die than do that

So they won't submit to the regime they never will

They would rather die than submit to the regime

Thank you, Zhang you appreciate you so much, man.

Each poll, each civilization has different values

and the fulfillment, the ability for those values to be fulfilled is what corresponds to their dignity.

Anyone who attempts to impose an external regime upon a people will be met with their full ferocity and their full

resistance. Why should China have submitted to the regime imposed upon them by

the colonial powers? Why should they have done that? They

chose death instead. They took up arms and fought with their lives to liberate

themselves because life is not enough. Biological life is not enough.

It's the full of the aspiration of your

ancestors, of your forefathers. How would they look down upon you knowing you submitted to an honorless regime?

Out of what?

Bribery?

Out of convenience?

That's no life.

That's no life. So I hope this perspective gives, allows you to understand why

they fight and why Israel simply cannot exist. It cannot exist. There is no real existence

corresponding to Israel. It doesn't have an existence. Do you understand? It's not a

civilization. Taking people from around the world strictly on the basis of their religion,

putting them in one place and expecting them to fulfill what is becoming of a nation is stupid.

You're abstract, you are violating the Jewish religion. You're abstracting people from the very context in which the Jewish religion could make sense. The Jews, you see, people say, oh, well, Jews have never had their own homeland.

Well, the Jewish religion that evolved and survived, I don't want to say evolved to insult,

I would say survived, very much spiritually deals with the implications of exile.

That's part of the identity.

It's part of what it means to be Jewish,true about that.

And the consequence has been what? Fighting idolatry?

Fighting idolatry? But in any case, Israel cannot exist. I'm telling you it cannot exist. It's not do I want it to exist. It cannot exist. It cannot exist. You understand? It cannot exist. This is not just about morality. It cannot exist. This is not just about morality.

It cannot exist.

You see what I mean?

It has no existence.

Look at Israeli citizens.

They're nihilistic.

They don't believe.

They're cynical. They don't believe. They're cynical. They don't believe in their own national project.

They have nothing to live for and nothing to die for.

How is that an existence? What existence corresponds to that? And how divided is Israel?

It's, it's, what, what unites Israel think about it what unites it?

Being Jewish well that's a point of contention itself.

So what really unites Israel? Pure force, pure power. Simple as that. What unites Israel is the pretense to

pure force and pure power. Literally, why are people in the IDF in Israel?

Because they have forcible conscription.

Because they're conscripted.

And what happens if you don't get conscripted?

You go to jail.

So people go and they say, I'll join the army and get conscripted.

Force, just pure force.

What sustains the state of Israel?

What is the basis of the state of Israel?

Is it people who choose to live and die in a certain way and establish a state corresponding

to that?

Organically flowing from their being and their existence?

No.

The basis of the Israeli state is pure force. Nothing else. Nothing else.

Nothing else. The authority of pure force. Pure, pure force. That's it.

The problem with Zionism, the problem with Israel, and the entire basis upon which it rests,

is that pure force is not pure.

Force in nature is contaminated with purpose.

It's not pure.

Every force that sustains you has an eschatology, has a purpose, has a beginning and an end,

and a rational conclusion that accounts for it.

Pure force is not pure force. It's force combined with fear.

But what happens when no one fears your force?

Is it a force anymore?

At that point, it's a...

You can kill them.

You can blow them up. Can you kill all of them, you can blow them up.

Can you kill all of them without being killed yourself?

You can't.

People always say, oh Israel can glass the whole Middle East.

They can't.

They simply can't.

Because if they did that, someone would come in and blow them up.

They have no pure force. The thing that the the the the the the idol of the it's an idol it's an idol it's an idol it's an idol

it's an idol of modern metaphysics.

And it's not sustainable. And it can't exist.

Pure force cannot sustain any state.

You think China exists just because pure force?

Because of the force of the state?

That's what keeps people in line?

No.

That's not what keeps China in line.

What keeps China in line is a people cognizant of themselves. Thank you so much, Australostan. Appreciate

you. Cognizant of their civilization. And if it wasn't the Communist Party dictatorship,

it would be something else. But it would still be China. That's the beauty of it. It would still be China

But if the Zionist regime disappeared

There would be no Zionist regime ever again

Because it has no roots in its own people it has no roots in the land and has no roots in the land and has no roots in its own people. It has no roots in the land. It has no roots in any civilization. In any people, in any community.

If the Zionist entity was overthrown, there would be no way you could ever refound

itself. How many times has the government of the R Rus civilization been overthrown?

Hundreds probably. I mean I'm exact. At least dozens.

Look at the time of...

They've always... and they always come back as the Rus.

They always come back.

How many times have the dynasties of China collapsed?

Plenty.

And they've always come back.

They've always come back.

How many times has the Iranian Empire collapsed?

Dozens, countless dozens.

And they've always come back.

They've always come back.

How many times have the Romans collapsed?

Many times. And they always come back. Whether they're the Ottomans or the Byzantines or

or something else. The Greeks or the Latins.

This is not true for Israel.

Israel is a fake country. It's a fake state.

If Israel collapsed, nothing would take its place corresponding to that state.

That region of the world has always been a part of a greater hole.

And Israel is an abstraction.

It's an abstraction from the concrete hole.

So even if you are a Zionist, why do I not hate Zionists by the way?

Zionists hate me. They call for my debt. They hate me. They give me death threats.

They hate me. They hate me, they give me death threats, they hate me, they

hate me. I don't hate them. I don't hate them. Why don't I hate them? Because I'm

telling them, I'm telling you, Israel cannot exist. This is not about your feelings. This is not about your morals even. This

is a simple fact of physics. Call it a fact of physics. It cannot exist. It's a, it's a, the laws of history. It's objective

science. It's simple science. Israel cannot exist. It simply cannot exist.

And you may be emotionally invested in the state of Israel.

You may believe in Israel.

It doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter.

It cannot exist. And this is simple, simple science.

This is not about hating Jews.

This is not about anything about Jews.

This is not about anything about Jews.

It's not.

Jews were chosen for this project

because it's in the Middle East.

And Europeans always associated Jews with the Middle East. So they encourage them to go to the Middle East.

So they encourage them to go to the Middle East, Muslim versus Jews. This is not what that's about.

I want to also talk about something that's really been bothering me, which has been how

people are trying to compare this to the expulsion of indigenous people in the United States.

Because I remember the viciousness of leftists and they would say, oh, you're just like

a Zionist.

You don't believe in land back?

You don't believe in land back.

You're a Zionist.

So let me address this very clearly. Let me address this very clearly with no ambiguity.

So they say, well, morally speaking, since Israel is stolen land, shouldn't it, and

therefore it has no right to exist, since America is stolen land, isn't it also a fake country that has no right to exist. Since America is stolen land, isn't it also a fake country that has no right

to exist? The problem is that stealing land alone is not what makes your country fake. First of all.

So that's just the first thing. The fact land is stolen is not what

makes a country fake. Period. What makes or break a country's reality isn't

whether it's stolen or not.

So that's the first thing we need to get past.

The second thing, I would say, is that

the reason the comparison is wrong is because the Palestinian struggle doesn't come from transcendent Western leftist morality.

It comes from the concrete reality of the people living there.

They are waging a struggle. and your support doesn't matter.

So it's about being objective. This is why I'm being objective and not moralizing. I say

Israel cannot exist, not should it or should it.

It cannot exist.

So let's get that out of the way.

Now the indigenous peoples of the U.S. are not waging any kind of struggle comparable to the

Palestinians right now.

They are not taking up, I mean they have in the past and they failed.

And we admire those who did that in the past and they're admirable, and their heroes, and their legends.

But this is simply not a reality that exists anywhere outside the fantasies of American leftists.

And what I mean by this is the notion that all of the land that was stolen from them will be returned to them.

Where is the reality? You claim this is morally necessary.

If a morality is not commensurate with reality, how can it be moral? What do you mean it's moral? It's not even

real. There's no basis for that being possible. And they say, well, if we just acted morally, it

could be possible.

Act as morally as you want, it will never happen.

So what you really want is the right to condemn everyone who's not going to go along with

it because they won't as immoral, and therefore have the right to kind of

terrorize and bother and pester and and be a pretentious retard who thinks

they're above everyone else. That's and be an antisocial freak.

That's what you're saying.

So it's not comparable.

It's not comparable whatsoever.

Now I haven't even started talking about this.

The other thing is, the Palestinian struggle is not just about Palestinians seeking land back.

Their seeking for land back is an existential struggle that is about the awakening of the entire region.

So it's a polar struggle of the entire region.

Now such an awakening has not occurred among American indigenous people.

Yet, maybe it can in the future.

But insofar as such an awakening happens, an awakening of indigenous consciousness,

where they stand to the task of discovering themselves

in the modern age. Guess what? I think that will be an American awakening. They will be spiritually leading our country because

America is also searching for that. This is what I was trying to say. America is

also searching. The difference between America and Israel is very simple. Israel has a false

certainty about what it is, but America is searching for what it is and is not, doesn't have a

definite conclusion.

America is not saying we are the Jewish state or we are this, we are that.

No, there's no certainty about what America is going to be. We don't know. It's an open door.

America's an open door. As far as what its existence

will be. Now does America have an existence now? Maybe we don't know. We don't know what the American existence is.

But an awakening of indigenous consciousness comparable to the Middle East region

will strengthen the American National Project.

It will provide us with spiritual leadership and spiritual

inspiration and guidance to discover what we are because we don't know. Do you

understand? We don't know.

Additionally, you have very simple matters.

Like the reason why there's a real estate dispute in Israel is also because of the Palestinian

diaspora, specifically the diaspora in the Middle

East, and the central significance of the right of return.

If there are indigenous people campaigning for a right of return, I fully support them, whose

ancestors were exiled and expelled from

our country or the landmass corresponding to our country. Thank you so much

My family lived near the border in Gaza the IDF kicked them out of their house on

Tuesday and we haven heard from them since please pray for them. Praying for them out of their house on Tuesday and we haven't heard from them since.

Please pray for them.

Praying for them, man.

That's tough.

Thank you so much, Mecca.

I appreciate you, man.

That's tough.

I'm praying for him, man. They say, well, Americans are settlers just like Israelis are settlers.

And that's just not true.

That's just not true.

That's just not true. Americans were settlers because they were searching for a new life

without knowing what that life would be. But Israelis are settlers on the basis of an unjustifiable certainty that their specific

way of life is superior to everyone around them.

Their morality and their Western values and so on and so on.

So it's very different actually.

And yes, many crimes were committed against indigenous people who lived here, absolutely.

But that alone is not enough to make for a national struggle.

A national struggle isn't based on...

By the way, here's another problem.

This is the element of hypocrisy.

The very basis with which you condemn the criminality

of the founding of America is also the very basis

of that criminality, meaning, yes, corresponding to colonialism and

modernity was an unprecedented criminality.

Yes, I agree. I'm not one of the people who just say to you all

Well, the Indians were fighting each other to and stealing each other's land. I know the difference between their ruthless

modernity of progress and the eradication and extermination of traditional cultures,

civilizations, and lifestyles, and how this is an abomination at the level of meaning.

So I understand the unprecedented criminality of colonialism, but with the unprecedented criminality of colonialism

also comes the unprecedented sense of absolute morality, absolute and

universal morality, which pre-modern civilizations did not have. So for you to for example

say that on a universal perspective, this is absolutely immoral, that came from

the same thing that killed the Indians.

You see? So you're a hypocrite.

The very premises with which you condemn America's founding as a country, is the object of condemnation itself.

You're condemning your own premises.

So let's not abandon and throw away the American country and the legitimacy of America as a

country which is a matter of objective fact just because its history is

written with immorality criminality and, and injustice. Because what, I mean slavery was a

comparable, I mean probably one of the worst injustices committed by man to man

in the history of the world, was modern colonial slavery.

Right?

But let's not let this claim that this entire country is illegitimate, because the same thing that allows you

to recognize the criminality of slavery is also what you're condemning the

history of this country. You heal the wound with

the spear which smote it. That's the Higalian logic. So America is not

illegitimate because its history is written with criminality, excess, and immorality.

And justice is accomplished in history very rarely when the injustice is reversed.

Justice in history, if you understand dialectics, if you understand Hegel, or if you've just read the Bible,

comes like a thief in the night.

The rectification of injustice, the establishment of justice on earth earth is always an irony.

It's always a cunning of history.

I'll give you an example.

The Romans.

The Romans crucified Jesus.

The Romans conquered Judea, they persecuted the Jews.

The Jews were conquered.

So the Jews said, where is my justice? And they fought the Romans

with so much veracity and they kept failing every time. So where was the justice for the

Jews? It was in the Roman Republic itself when Julius Caesar gave form to the contradictions of the Republic

and he was killed and assassinated and the Empire rose.

And the Empire eventually fell to what to Christianity?

Isn't that ironic?

So this is an example of the ironies of history, avenging the injustice of the past. The Hegelian twist of history, avenging the injustice of the past, the Hegelian twist of history,

which establishes justice in a way no one could have foreseen.

So the land back people are saying, for example,

the only way to rectify the wrongdoing of the past is by giving all of the indigenous

people back the land that was stolen, throughout all of the American landmass, basically, right?

And then some may say, the only way to reverse the wrongdoing of slavery is by calculating the exact cost

of slavery and giving them it back, the debt back, right?

But the problem with this is it's a crude understanding of how historical injustice is set right.

Justice is given to history almost never, actually I will say never in the form of, in the form of reversing the injustice. In that case it's not a historical event. What

do I mean by that? So if I go to your house and I for example kill everyone in your house

and I don't know set it on fire right how is that

injustice dealt with eye for an eye and let's say there's a just court system, okay, then you have to pay, you have to, you have to, you have to get justice done. So an institution has to oversee this, right? So I'm a criminal, I go to jail or I get beheaded or tortured, whatever, and justice is done. Now let me ask you

a question. Is that a historical event? That's not a historical event. It's not historical

proper. That is just a part of a historical stage we're living in. It's the daily business of life.

We have a standard of justice and we fulfill it. So if I go to your, if I go and steal your car

and then the police catch me and they give the car back to you.

Justice is done. I stole something from you and it's given back to you. But that's

not a historical event. To rectify a historical injustice, the injustice has to be incapable of being satisfied by

the institutions corresponding to that era of history, in which case the injustice is rectified by a cunning of history, which gives resolution

and meaning to that injustice in a way that no one could have foreseen.

And if you could have foreseen it, it's not historical. Think about that.

Historical events happen only when they're unforeseen.

That's what makes it historical.

If you could foresee something happening, it's not historical.

Like, the sun rising in the morning is not historical.

We know it's going to happen.

But when something happens you can't expect, you have to enter it into your chronicle

of history.

Because history is just recording things.

We didn't know we're going to happen and now we know

them you see so historical justice is not the same thing as the relative justice.

What land back proponents are advocating for is a relative justice overseen by institutions,

presumably ones that exist or ones that we ought to create right now.

I think that's an insult to the injustice committed upon the American Indians. That's an insult to them.

Now by the way, when I say land back, I'm not

talking about like the relative land back, which is, you know, giving them more

land and stuff, honoring old treaties. Yeah, yeah, that's fine. I'm talking about

the crazy landback that says America's just like Israel and all of America must be given back to indigenous people

So to be clear. That's what I mean by it, right?

That that cannot be that doing justice to that historical crime cannot be done by means of the relative justice.

It has to be a historical justice.

And the historical justice will be the establishment of an American proletarian dictatorship and a people state and the overthrow of

the capitalist class and the reign of private property because it was the

reign of private property that was responsible for the criminality against the indigenous people.

So that will be a form of justice.

And certainly, in an American communist state,

today's justice will be accomplished for indigenous people.

They will no longer have to live in squalor and poverty and being harassed by feds and

so on.

They will have autonomy.

Their culture will flourish like never before, they will repopulate,

repopulate rapidly, and they will be one of the pillars of the future American civilization.

But American civilization must include history, not erase it.

It must include history.

Now, why is this not true for Israel?

Because, here's why.

Because Palestinians are not fighting to go back to 1947,

and they're not fighting to go back to 1920,

and they're not simply fighting for land back.

They are fighting for a state and a civilization worthy of their existence.

And we have no way of knowing what that will look like.

And on account of not knowing that, or at least whatever that is, not

having a ready-made precedent, justice for the Palestinians will come in a way no one could foresee. Justice for Palestinians

will not come when UN NGOs go to Israel and say okay be nicer to the power

give them this give them a no justice for the Palestinians will come when the power, give them this, give them a, no, justice for the Palestinians will come

when the Israeli state is toppled and the fucking, I don't know, the neo-Otomahman empire

rises from the ashes.

Now, don't quote me on that.

I'm not saying the actual Ottoman Empire. I'm saying

something worthy of the history of that region. A grand empire as vast in scale as

these empires. Like it is already the current the current revolution in the Levant, the

current conflict in Palestine is already a historical irony in the justice that it is. Because who's back in Hamas? Who's

back in Hamas? It's not even the Arabs. It's fucking Iran, man. I ran, the Persian

Empire. Isn't that ironic? Who could have foreseen that? Iran, the ancient empire of the reason.

Thank you, Ryan.

I can't thank you enough for your content and excellent commentary.

God bless you.

Thank you so much, Ryan. I appreciate it, man.

Thank you so much. It's Iran. Isn't that a historical irony? Isn't that incredible?

Who could have foreseen that? That Iran is coming back? The Persian Empire? I mean the Shaw,

nobody would have expected this in 1960 or in 1970.

Iran is the one holding up the Palestinian resistance. That's already a historical justice. That's not simply a return to 1947. No, this is something beyond.

This is an awakening of an ancient empire. Going far beyond and exceeding far beyond any relative standard of

justice carried from the past, such as the two-state solution. Land back if anything

is more comparable to the two-state solution, but it's really

not, by the way.

But if it was, but this is going beyond that.

And I don't just mean beyond in terms of the scale of its ambition.

I mean beyond in terms of what it is of its ambition. I mean beyond in terms of what it is as

a historical event. Why did the Palestinians have to suffer so much? Why was their land stolen?

Why did they have to go through the Nakba in this nightmare? They had to go through this

in order for that the people of that region could rise to the task of the

challenge set before them by the modern age. That's why. So you see in this way we avoid the

trap of historical neolism. We avoid the trap of making this just

about some purely transcendent morality. No, we unite morality with reality and

history itself. So we need to sharply distinguish our understanding of this struggle

from the narrow leftist lens because that's not what this is. This struggle is

different than how it's being framed in the US where they're saying,

oh, this is just the same thing as,

no, this is not about land back.

This is about humanity at the most fundamental level. Because why am I telling you guys this?

Because the right-wing scumbag grifters are trying to make it seem like that the only opening

within the West for appreciating the Palestinian cause is this liberal pink-haired

leftism.

And I'm here to announce, no, we can be Westerners, and that's what I am, by the way, and be sympathetic to the Palestinians

and understand their struggle without being these liberal leftists.

I gave you an analysis of the situation that draws from Heidegger, you know, serious deep Western

oriented contemplation. In order for we Westerners to understand this conflict

we go to Heidegger. We understand things like what is Dassine? What is an existence of a people?

For example, the Iranians were also into Heidegger too, by the way, for the same reason.

I had to reiterate, why did I get into Heidegir? Because of Palestine, motherfucker!

By the way, because Palestine is about a struggle for authentic being

against the inauthentic and artificial existence imposed upon them

by the state of Israel.

So we can be in the West and understand and think about and interrogate and try to

understand the significance of this struggle without either being these

disgusting leftists or who will turn on a dime, by the way, on the Palestinians.

Or the right wing and the Zionists.

Because you know, in Israel itself, the Western left is the same as the Israeli left.

You know there's a left, you know there's leftists in Israel itself,

who are literally just Tel Aviv liberals, complete nihilists.

They're an existential enemy of Palestinians. and they're literally there.

And all they do is posture that they're pro-Palestinian liberation, just like the Western

Leftists, right?

And it's just like how Western leftists say, oh, if you're an

American, you're a settler. Even though I'm an American and I live here and I'm a settler,

I recognize I'm going to check my privilege. So there's Israeli leftist checking their

privilege. Is this the only way to have solidarity with

the Palestinians to be a stupid hypocritical retarded leftist? No. And you may ask me,

okay, Haas, if you're an Israeli, how would you respond to this? Let's say you're living in

Israel. How could you show solidarity with the Palestinians? Simple. Not only abandoned the

Zionist delusion, but appreciate their regional future. Appreciate the fact that if you are going to be part

of the future of the Middle East, Israel cannot exist and you will have to be a part of a bigger

state and a broader civilization which you must learn from and adapt to in some kind of way.

Because the modern nihilism of the detached hedonistic subject is not what's going to be

the future of that region.

So you must accept the leadership of the real indigenous forces to the region.

You say, well, you'd leave.

Sure, you'd leave, and then go to America and become a leftist who's the same?

No. I mean, leave it, yeah, I mean, no fault in leaving whatsoever.

But for those who cannot leave, you know,

they must accept the region.

They must accept, just like in South Africa, you know.

And there will always be room for Jews in the future of the Middle East. How do I know that? I know the history. That's how I know. Because I know the history.

Am I saying that Jews and Christians should be dimmies? No, that's nonsense. That's nonsense.

Just like how in China they brought back the Chinese civilization, but they didn't go back to these backward practices of making all the non-manchu's where that shaved their heads in a certain way.

They didn't go back to that, but in a more fundamental level, they restored the Chinese

civilization.

So that's what I would say. Yeah, there's Israelis who resist the mandatory military service.

And this is not about hate. They say this is about hatred. This is not about the hatred for individuals.

This is about the hatred for a false existence, for a false evil oppressor,

which is the state, the government of Israel.

And those behind this government. Okay. I see the Jordanian king claims to be supporting Palestine right now, but he's allowing Western

NATO jets to land in Jordan to defend Israel or support its campaign.

So this is what everyone says this. China says this. Russia says this.

This is the standard line.

See, look, the 1967 borders is the standard line of those outside of the region.

I'm not saying Russia's bad for having this line.

China's not bad for having this line.

No one's bad for having this line per se, but it just doesn't reflect the reality of the

region.

That's what it is.

You know? It just doesn't.

And by the way, it would never be possible because the state of Israel would never accept it.

Iran and Saudi Arabia have had phone calls, they're talking together.

I'm aware.

I've been made aware. So guys, tell me this, one's in the chat if you need these streams to start starting

way earlier.

One's in the chat.

Ones if you need these streams to be like way earlier.

And these are too late.

Ones of the stream is too late.

All right. Hi. Guys, I'm gonna do the best I can to start the stream tomorrow earlier. Understand I'm also working on a book and I'm writing stuff.

So pay attention to that. I've got a lot of pressure to do this kind of stuff.

Um, sorry. Sorry. Also, I think there's going to be a new standard.

Either I'm going to take Fridays off or Saturdays off.

But I'm either going to be taking Friday off or I'm going to be taking Saturday off.

Okay? So I'll tell you, I'll tell you, I'll let you know. Friday or Saturday I'll be taking them off.

Okay?

I'll let you know that tomorrow. I'm streaming tomorrow definitely.

I do try to have, in what are these days that I take off by the way?

I take off days to see my family. I have family days.

Um, because do you guys know something?

You know, I live with my girlfriend.

Beyond that, the only people I hang out with is my family.

That's it.

Whenever I have free time, I spend it with my family to hang out.

Like watch movies, eat together, drink tea, talk, you know.

And let me just tell you guys,

when you get to my age, I'm 27 or whatever,

it seems like, oh, that's cringe,

that's the best thing in the world, right?

That's the best thing ever.

You don't, that's all you need.

That's all you need. That is all you need.

Well, that's all I need for a social life, but other people might be different.

But it's like

You know there's nothing like

The home-cooked meal, you know, I don't know.

Your bank is, don't worry about it, you could save it. Save your dono for tomorrow.

Hope you guys found, ones if you found the stream insightful and

two is if you just could follow.

All right, I'm glad if you guys found it insightful.

I'm glad if you did.

I hope that clears up why this is not comparable to like the land back and the bigger stakes

of this conflict and why people really don't understand what it's about.

Yes, Israel is immoral. It commits blatant crimes out in the open. It's a criminal state.

But always keep a broader perspective of this is more than that.

This is not just about Israel being bad, even though it is.

This is about the, what, what they're fighting for and struggling for in Palestine, you know? And I hope this encourages you to understand.

Put it this way. If you believe Israel can always exist, you also believe capitalism can always exist. You also believe unipolarity can also exist. You also believe capitalism can always exist. You also believe unipolarity

can also exist in the British Empire. You believe, oh it's just pure force. Remember, take

this quote away from me. There's no such thing as pure force because force is always contaminated with purpose.

So there's no such thing.

It's always contaminated with a pesky thing called purpose.

Israel cannot exist.

Australostani, let's go!

Simply cannot exist.

I saw Putin's statement, yes.

The laws of history ensure the victory of communism, just like the laws of history

ensure the demise of Israel as a state. Anyway, guys, I will see you

Starside.