🔴 RED PILL NEWS | TRUMP FOUND GUILTY! | FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸

It's hard.

Now I'm waiting in the dark for a light

From the top down to the bottom, when the mess won't take my mind's advice, would you stay though?

Try to help me out.

Could it ever be others?

Could it ever be you to disease who you did the seas?

Sure of myself, but I'm sorry.

Would you stay though?

Try to help me

God destiny.

EJ, what up, Lionel?

See y'all EJ with the four lineup with the one.

What's going on, guys?

I see you.

What's up, everybody?

Just another day and another thing that happened politically.

I am not going to take up a lot of your time tonight.

I want to kind of get to the meat and potatoes, talk about exactly what we're here to talk about, which is the um

The news about Trump.

The news about Trump.

I took a hot shower today, so my eyes are not looking very good.

That's okay.

Anyway, guys, we want to talk about Trump today.

That's what we're here for.

And specifically, I wanted to do this stream because I want to give you guys an outline of how you should be responding to Trump's indictment, what to do, what not to do, what our line is, yada, yada, yada.

I never used to talk about this before because we were never an organization.

But we're going to be forming one, right?

So this is.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Anyway.

What is the MAGA communist position on Trump's indictment?

I'm sure you've read my tweet already.

That's just for the general public.

I want to tailor a more specific message for you on this matter because I have a lot of thoughts on it indeed.

First of all,

Crass, what's going on?

I feel like a lot of people

don't really understand the MAGA communism thing.

It's so stupid for me to say that two years later, because clearly that means it failed.

But it's not entirely a failure.

It's intuitively, people do understand it.

It's just that when people think about it too much, they read too much into it, they draw wrong conclusions.

Instead of reading my sub stack, if you want to put glasses on and think about the meme, you should read my sub stack.

Otherwise, don't overthink it too much, right?

It's a good rule of thumb.

But.

First of all, we have no loyalty to Trump.

I want to be clear about that.

We don't have loyalty to Trump.

So

We you need to th Why am I saying this?

Because it's not our job to be at the avant-garde of the conservative political pundits expressing outrage over Trump's indictment.

It's not our job.

They're already doing that.

We'll never beat them at that job because they have a lot of money behind them.

They have a lot of backing behind them.

We'll never replace that.

We'll never be able to compete with that.

We should appreciate the significance of this indictment.

Undoubtedly, we should appreciate the significance of it.

and by this time I'm sure you're mature enough to know how to talk to people about things like this.

Of course, it's rigged.

The judiciary was totally rigged against him.

That's obvious to anyone.

You have to be an idiot to think that Trump was found guilty on fair charges.

But you know what we're not going to do?

You want to know what we're not going to do?

Let me show you exactly what we're not going to do.

Oh boy, I might have to find this.

I might have to find this.

Where is it?

Let me show you precisely what we are not going to do in response.

It's super cringe.

I have to show it to Yeah, here it is.

Oh god.

It's kinda just disgusting looking at it.

Uh I am so cringed out.

I don't, you know, wanna offend anyone.

I don't wanna offend any groups, but this is just giving me clear vibes, clear red flags.

Um

Ah, this is not what we're gonna do.

What the fuck is this gay nonsense?

All right.

I'm sorry.

What else do I call it?

Could you imagine his rage right now for what they did to his father?

He saw it.

He saw it all.

I pray the world can handle his wrath.

I hope this is a joke.

I feel like it's not a joke, and the guy who typed this is like in a psychotic episode, perversely enjoying, like, yeah, no, it's really a movie this time.

The movie's gonna be, you know.

So much of contemporary politics is people just wanting to destroy the barrier between the the T V screen and real life or the gaming screen.

They're like, this really all these emotions that this video game and this movie are stirring in me, I just want that to be in real life too.

And it's like, finally, is this the moment where the movie's gonna become real life?

And it's so fucking cringe, all right?

This is really s this this level of glazing is fucking crazy.

First of all,

Ah, it's just yeah.

Just want to point this out as like the ex the exact thing that we should not

This is so cringe, I don't even know where to begin.

Do I have to describe why this is really fucking cringe and disgusting?

He saw what?

He saw what?

Why?

This is nothing new, all right?

If you have a minimum level of education.

You will know that what they're doing against Trump is not unprecedented in terms of the extent of the crime, the criminality of it.

You know, the extent to which the system is being rigged in an unfair way.

That's not anything new.

All right.

So, can we stop this fucking nonsense?

Cringe nonsense?

Hot take with the five.

What's up, man?

Yeah, it's like trying, dude.

He saw it all.

He saw it all.

Like, what the fuck is this guy like?

The survivor of like he's making it seem like this is some like it's like Game of Thrones, and he like he just saw a battle where the Targaryens sacked a village and burned it with dragon fire.

He saw it all with his eyes, he saw it all.

He's gonna shut up, dude.

Shut the fuck up.

You're such a cringe retard.

Go back to fucking gaming and gooning, you fucking freak, twisted little freak.

You know, these disgusting little cockroaches come after Logo all the time because all Logo is telling them is just to read books instead of gooning and gaming all the time as their primary source of uh inspiration on how to understand the real world.

All logo says is like, yeah, like.

Maybe you shouldn't binge watch Star Wars and Game of Thrones and m maybe you shouldn't be playing games and gooning all the time and watching anime to understand the real world.

Maybe you should actually pick up a fucking book and read.

And that that put them into s that put these far right guys into such like a level of soy rage and seeth that they're still coming after him to this day.

Anyway, I just wanted to say that uh

Regarding that, what I just showed you, um

Uh we we are not followers of Trump.

So we can observe and clear ver see very clearly what this indictment is.

The whole country can see it for what it is.

But our message should be a unique message.

Our message isn't just to follow whatever Ben Shapiro is saying.

Okay.

If your message is indistinguishable from a Republican congressman, maybe you should

You should you should have more um you should value yourself more.

You should recognize that you're here to offer something more, uh, something unique, something specific.

Otherwise, what's the point, right?

If you want to go intern for the Republican Party, go do that.

Uh

How should I put it, you know?

There there's two extremes you don't want to go in, and I'll give you the extremes.

I'll tell you th I'll give you the extremes so you can know what the Stalinist golden center is.

One extreme is that where you're just glazing the fuck out of, you know, the blaze.

You're just like, oh my god, this is oh my god, this is the this is like nine eleven times five.

We need to avenge Trump.

It's like, okay, it's clearly a very primitive state of consciousness.

Then, on the other hand, there's the smug, you know, self-satisfied, pseudo-intellectual glasses where he's like, nothing ever happens.

I'm so above all this.

You don't want to be either of those.

I'm not trying to be the latter.

I'm just trying to explain that when it comes to navigating this.

You know, at the risk of sounding ridiculous, I care more about

I care more about what Joe Sims is doing than what Joe Biden is doing.

What Joe Sims is doing is just more directly relevant for the sphere of action.

That

actually matters to me and in which I can actually make a difference.

Joe Biden and Donald Trump

I mean, the the the there are so there are so many degrees of separation between the sphere of our practical intervention and what's going on at that level.

It's almost like talking about space, outer space and stars and planets and shit.

It's like how I can't affect that.

That's totally beyond me, right?

We can affect it indirectly by setting off a chain reaction, that's our goal, kind of.

But we're not going to affect people's attitude toward Trump or Biden or any of that.

All we can really do is focus on our own business as communists, focus on the Communist Party, focus on our own organization as communists.

And it's only from that basis that we can even articulate a voice politically in the first place to to inter intervene and remark and comment on matters like this.

Because the truth is as far as you and I are concerned, what's going on to Trump, it's the same thing as like an astronomical event.

It's just like an objective thing happening out there.

We have no pr our voice doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter.

All we can know how to do is not waste our effort and waste our energy getting sucked into meaningless political discourse over which we have no influence.

Do you understand what I'm trying to say here?

I'm not very satisfied with the gorilla's reaction.

to this round of discourse.

I get that we're supposed to be doing the most to maximize engagement and whatnot, but we can do that, but you're not succeeding at doing that because you'll never be you'll never have more reach than Tim Poole, for example.

Let's actually focus on our niche, okay?

Focusing on our niche.

Means uh

continuing to educate people.

And it's like why do I say that people misunderstand the MAGA communism thing?

Because MAGA communism uh let me let me actually explain it and simplify like a really simple way.

This will actually like make more sense to you, you know.

No heavy theory, I'll just straight up explain to you.

Like

MAGA Communism.

in a way that I probably can't explain to a journalist, but I think I'll be able to explain it to you, right?

Um

MAGA communism is basically the view that the space for political neutrality in the US is gone.

Now and the space for political neutrality on the world stage is gone.

Now, what do I mean by that?

I think there is a I think what what what needs to be

Critiqued.

More so than any positive affirmation of Trump, what my real goal is to have critiqued

The liberal realist view of politics, according to which politics is just kind of like this empty vacuum.

Like, let me put it this way.

This is I don't know if this is going to make sense to you, right?

Trump kind of represented this really bizarre, surreal political event in the United States.

The MAGA movement is a cult, and it's like it's this surreal, bizarro thing that happened in American politics

And and then after Trump, it's Biden and things just return to normal, right?

So let's think about the normal of politics, right?

The normal of politics is what I would call like politically neutral, liberal, realist politics.

It's basically like devoid of any kind of partisanship or over-enthusiasm.

It's basically just the default the norm of politics in in you know neoliberal societies.

And you know you know who always kind of illustrates

The metaphysical vision underlying that is HBO.

Like, if you watch HBO Chernobyl, for example, I think it's actually the perfect.

liberal response to the Trump era.

Because it's like it's this contrast between this, you know, um very partial partisan Soviet ideological project and it's just like this partial um political um

Orientation re represented by the Communist Party rule and the ideology and so on and so on.

And then H what HBO does is it contrasts it with this extremely dreary, decaying, just totally empty, totally plain uh world of not simply total depravity, but total um

total uh indifference, you know.

If you get what I'm saying, it's like this gray, meaningless world contrasted with this vain attempt to just kind of give it content somehow.

through a partial political project.

And that's basically the liberal world view when it comes to global authoritarianism, right?

The the the norm is liberal democracy, Fukuyama, the end of history.

And then like China and Russia and North Korea are all these dictatorships and, you know.

Dictatorships are it's almost like they have a Rousseauian view where it's like the natural state is Fukuyama's end of history and then the global authoritarians and and the cult of these strongmen and so on that's this kind of like extra force that's imposed on the reality warping and bending it.

It's also the kind of liberal appraisement of Lysenko itself in the sphere of modern science, right?

You have a neutral, bland, indifferent reality and Lysenko bends and warps that with a specific specificity of an ideological project of some kind, right?

So my provocative this is like the essence of the MAGA communism thing, really.

This is all it it's not even necessarily political as much as it is a new understanding of what politics is.

That the default in America and the world is not Fukuyama's liberal democracy and the end of history.

That the default orientation of world history today trends in the direction of partisan politics, trends in the direction of dictatorship and authoritarianism.

But not in the classical understanding of like emergency, Carl Schmidt, state of emergency, but just in the sense of kind of like.

this new plane of politics

inaugurated by the Bolshevik Revolution act actually, of mass politics.

Mass politics which is defined by uh a new form of so uh popular sovereignty that's based in media, right?

Not based in constitutions, not based in

formalism of law, but it's based in uh the active relationship

usually through some kind of media,

Between power and the people, and Trump's media was social media, right?

Obviously, it was decentralized media.

Mass media, like CNN and the rest, kept up the veneer, even though that's already see Fukuyama's liberal democracy was already this kind of dictatorship, but it just disguised itself as totally neutral and unbiased and just an end of history.

But Trump exposed how it was very clearly like upheld by specific media institutions, by specific institutions of the open society and civil society.

So it was just like a dictatorship, like any other, except there's no.

There's no popular sovereignty uh there.

It's just a kind of uh pure one-sided dictatorship.

For there to be a popular sovereignty, there has to be the minima of some kind of cognizance by the masses and awareness of the specificity of this specific orientation.

um of politics.

Like we are going in this direction.

Stalin is the great helmsman steering us in this direction in the five-year plan.

This specific plan, this specific journey, this specific political project, this specific kind of vision for the country, right?

A specificity that is inherently too subjective for the liberal view.

It's based in a kind of pure will, but it's based in a kind of subjective articulation of the feeling and the mood of the masses.

It's it's it's the political superstructure of socialism, really.

However imperfect and unscientific and whatever, that's that's that's the whole world is trending in that direction objectively, right?

And neoliberalism and liberals are these reactionaries who are basically unable to keep up with that.

They're unable to cope with it.

They're unable to respond to it.

Right.

It is Anglo Cycles.

I'm just so fucking like, dude, where why did you even type that?

All right, just type that in your own notes.

It's like I get so disappointed 'cause it's like is what I'm saying just flying over your heads?

Yeah, I don't know how to explain it well.

Like, I didn't prepare a transcript for tonight's stream.

I just thought people would fucking get it.

Like, put it this way, right?

I don't know how to explain it.

Surrealism, it's put it this way, this will make it make sense.

Do you guys know what surrealism is?

Do you know what that means when people say it's surreal?

Realism, pure realism,

Gay?

takes more effort

to maintain in terms of how reality is depicted than surrealism.

That's actually a purport of the surrealist art movement.

Like, in surrealism, all you gotta fucking do is paint the dreams that you're having, and it's gonna look wacky and weird and uncanny.

That's what your dreams are.

It takes no effort.

But to be faithful to reality exactly as it is, with this pretense of like neutral objectivity, that takes more effort.

It takes more effort to maintain that.

So, my view is like it's the same shit when it comes to politics.

Why are we communists?

Assuming that the default of our political staging ground is this kind of pre-MAGA liberal democracy.

What if MAGA represents this irreversible trend in the direction of American politics that's simply irreversible and unavoidable?

We can't simply be neutral.

Like, I have many, I would say, left-wing.

Uh I I people I'm sympathetic with.

whose basic criticism of me was like, Look, Haas,

Your analysis of the regime is correct, but like, dude, Trump and MAGA was a total failure and it was a total disaster and you should just completely forget about it and ignore it and like s what's this MAGA communism nonsense, all right?

We need j we need to just move past Trump and MAGA and quickly forget about it.

And it's like, I don't disagree with them because of what they're because they're wrong about Trump.

They're they're right about Trump in terms of like, you know, his political

Uh

Failure to challenge the establishment.

Like, that's totally correct.

But why are they beginning with the assumption that we can just go back to pre-MAGA politics in America?

That's what I don't accept.

It's like, okay, they're making it seem like here's American politics.

MAGA came, it failed, it's total disaster.

So let's go back to square one and like do something.

And it's like, I don't buy that.

I don't think we can go back to square one.

I don't think there's neutral political space that exists anymore.

I think MAGA has irreversibly warped American political space.

And MAGA just means American partisan politics at this point, such that there are many pan-leftists.

If they're principled enough about anti-imperialism, they'll get accused of being MAGA.

Now they'll deny it and be like, I have nothing to do with Trump, I have nothing to do with MAGA.

But all these NAFO people will call like actual DSA members sometimes, be like, you're like a MAGA supporter.

And it's like, well, there's a reason for that.

It's not necessarily because those people support Trump.

That's not why.

It's because partisan politics in America has become is post-MAGA.

Y MAGA is what created the foundation for that, right?

A good example is Russia.

It's like

I'm not saying Trump and Putin are one for one, but in Russia there's no neutral political space.

Putin you know, Yeltsin came and introduced liberal democracy to Russia, but the strong man politics represented by Putin is just irreversible.

Like there's no going back to square one of neutral political space.

Putin has had an irreversible effect on Russian politics.

So, if you're a communist in Russia, you're a Putin communist.

You don't even necessarily have to agree with Putin on everything, but you agree with Putin the way in which Putin has reasserted some form of Russian sovereignty.

Or, at least, the pretense, the aspiration for one.

And in the case of America, Trump doesn't represent American sovereignty, but he has come to represent symbolically the dream for American sovereignty.

And that's what MAGA has come to be defined by.

So that's the point of MAGA communism.

It's not that we should make an alliance with MAGA grifters.

And, you know.

And comp and how should I say suspend our communist politics and just kind of you know become people who go on Twitter like all right guys, here's my MAGA strategy.

It's more like

There's no political neutrality in the US.

There's no neutral space.

There's no way to be outside of it.

The best we can hope for, and this is our orientation, is to integrate MAGA.

historically integrate Maga.

I think a good example is like take take the Irish and their struggle, for example.

When the Irish were struggling against Britain under the reactionary banner of the um

The Catholic monarchy.

They failed.

It was a disaster.

But the Irish revolutionaries, inspired by the French Revolution that came later, still integrated that history of resistance within their revolutionary history.

They didn't go back to it.

They didn't lower themselves to it.

They didn't confine themselves to it.

They did a lot of self-criticism.

But in Ireland, there's no way to be politically neutral.

There's no way to just be like, oh, yeah.

These guys were reactionary, so we should support the British.

It's more like they were reactionary because they weren't able to fight the British well enough.

And I feel like it's a similar thing with MAGA, kind of, you know?

It's like it's not that we support Trump.

It's not that we are like, oh yeah, we're gonna get Trump in power.

It's more like there's no way to be neutral.

And why am I saying there's no way to be neutral?

Because it's like the position that's just like, fuck MAGA and fuck the Democrats both.

It's like that's not a real position.

Even if you say, which is what we kind of s believe, like fuck Trump and fuck Biden.

I'm willing to say that.

Fuck them both.

Fuck Trump and fuck Biden, right?

No problem.

But even if I say that, I'm saying that in the context of what MAGA has already set the precedent for and laid the foundation for.

Like, there's no way to say fuck Trump and fuck Biden in a neutral way.

Do you get what I'm saying with that?

There's no way to say that outside the context of this, like, the birth of American partisan politics, a new struggle for American popular sovereignty.

There's no way to escape that.

And MAGA.

Is what set the precedent for that before anyone else, for better or for worse.

That's what MAGA has come to mean, and that's what it created.

So.

It's like I've had to explain this a million times, but I feel like this is a

New opportunity to say Revcom say MAGA is fascist.

Yeah, there's like they'll say Xi Jinping is fascist fascist and Putin is fascist.

That's just like a totally meaningless cope.

It's just nonsense, you know?

Um

That's that's because if you read my sub stack, it's like that's because

Liberals view anything that goes beyond the form of liberal politics as fascism.

Now, let me translate that for you because, like, that's really easy to digest, but like, really think about it.

What they're trying to say is that anything that transgresses the norm of Fukuyama's neoliberal democracy and the end of history, that's fascist authoritarianism.

That's the triumph of the will.

That's the, you know, that's how they see it: the triumph of the will.

So, like that Nazi movie, right?

That's going beyond Fukuyama's end of history.

It's reintroducing strongman politics.

It's reintroducing, you know, loaded politics, partial politics, you know, actual politics, right?

Isn't that what politics is?

But I digress.

Politics devoid of neutrality.

Politics not based on biased politics, right?

And they think that's fascist because, like, they're thinking of fascism as this Darth Vader authoritarianism.

Um

But what if

Authoritarianism is just

the more default tendency of world history after the October Revolution and after the dis the during the transition we're witnessing from the capitalist mode of production.

That's really the provocative thesis there.

It's like authoritarianism is not a triumph of the will.

It's not the actual actualism of Gentile and the fascist view of like politics as the transgressive will power asserted over reality.

You know, that's not what authoritarianism is.

Authoritarianism is something that's actually more seamless, if you will.

It's more objective.

It's more, put it this way: if you go with the flow, the flow is toward authoritarianism.

The flow is toward post-democratic politics.

And by democratic, I mean like post-open society, Fukuyama, end of history, liberal democracy.

It's like the institutions of liberalism.

are no longer enough objectively.

Social media now plays this role

of reintroducing political partiality and partisanship that is somehow able to bypass the institutions of liberalism, right?

The Bolshevik Revolution is what laid the precedent for that, though.

Remember, that's what started it.

The Bolshevik Revolution, you know, I want you guys to understand this: all power to the Soviets.

You know what that meant?

All power to the Soviets didn't just mean some guy sitting in a room somewhere, signing documents, transferring formal power to a new institution of political authority.

All power to the Soviets is when they would deck out entire like s trains

with political propaganda, red banners and posters and megaphones and music, and they would go out into the countryside with this overwhelming bombastic propaganda

And, like, that was power.

That was the power of the Soviets.

That was the authority.

It was this new relationship to power based on media, right?

And yes, there was local there was of course a local exercise of power with the Soviets.

That was an authentic form of political authority, obviously.

But

In many ways, mass media bypassed the formalism of liberalism, especially under Stalin with the Stalin cult of personality.

The Stalin cult of personality was precisely what I'm talking about, right?

Same with the Mao cult of personality under the Cultural Revolution.

And then, you know, it doesn't take a great leap.

for people like Ann Applebaum to then say, Oh, the Trump cult of personality is a form of Bolshevism.

Well, what is she trying to say?

Is she trying to say Trump is a communist?

No.

She's trying to say that sociologically, this new form of

Um this new s way of politics is being structured

Can trace its lineage to the Bolshevik Revolution.

And I don't think that's necessarily an unfair assessment, actually.

Um yeah, it's there with AMLO, you you name it.

That's the default orientation of history right now.

So be like, Haas, doesn't Hitler fit the bill for this?

And it's like, That's what you don't understand.

No.

No, Hitlerism is

the state of emergency.

Hitlerism is the suspension

A simultaneous suspension and maintenance of the liberal political metaphysics.

So Hitlerism.

Maintains the old liberal form of politics, it just adds this kind of excessive anarchic emergency, arbitrary dictatorship on top of it, which isn't based on a form of popular sovereignty mediated through media.

I know Benjamin said fascism is the aestheticization of politics, but Hitlerism wasn't primarily based on propaganda and media.

It was actually based on brute force.

It was based on thugs beating people in the street into submission.

The propaganda and stuff, uh the excessive propaganda constantly, constantly blowing it up in people's ears, whatever, that came later, but that was not propaganda that was um a relationship.

That was one-sided propaganda.

That was, you know, a dictatorship with a megaphone blowing these words into people's ears.

and people obeying.

But Bols but but Bolshevism, for example,

This new form of popular sovereignty based in media, power through media, right?

That was based on a relationship where the authority that is propagating the message had to be responsive to the reaction of the masses and use that as input, and so on and so on.

So, there's a kind of dialectical relationship there.

That's why it's a form of popular sovereignty.

It's a new evolution of popular sovereignty.

The Stalin cult of revolution, sorry, the Stalin cult of personality is incomparable to the Hitler's dictatorship because the Stalin cult of personality was a form of popular sovereignty and represented a dialogue between the institutions of political authority and the masses.

Whereas Hitlerism represented the one-sided dictatorship of the financial capitalist ruling class simply imposing its will upon the whole country and upon the whole population.

at gunpoint, you know, and and um

Of course many Germans were corralled.

into the Nazi regime and into support for it, but that was only to the extent that they

Um

That they were impressed with, and were.

I mean, people really neglect how the Nazis.

represented a continuity with the Weimar era.

The Nazis came out and said we will just preserve stability.

We will just restore order.

The order of the Weimar Republic is what they were talking about.

And you know, prevent the communists from coming and taking over.

So the people were extremely passive under Hitler.

It wasn't like this the Stalin cult of personality was not.

A didn't politically represent the political passivity of the masses.

On the contrary, it represented an immense activity on part of the masses in participating in the construction of the Soviet state.

So there's a fundamental difference there.

Liberals constantly accuse Bolshevism, that's what we should call it, of being fascism.

So any ch they'll call Omlo a fascist, but Omlo's cult of personality can trace its origins to 1917, not 1933.

And maybe there's a case to be made for Trump.

I mean, it sounds crazy.

But when you stop thinking in terms of political policy and ideology and all this superficial bullshit, which really isn't is meaningless, okay, it's just noise, it's not meaningful, it's just noise.

When you think when you get to the like the essence of the matter,

The mass politics represented by MAGA in relation to, you know, neoliberalism is a colonization by the October Revolution upon American liberalism.

It's a way our society has just become infected by this objective change in world history represented by the triumph of socialism over capitalism.

And it's like, of course, it takes the form of the previous era.

It takes the form of, you know.

American nationalism and, you know, uh pro capitalist sloganeering and whatever and anti communist sen you know uh rhetoric.

But that's just like a stupid costume that's like just it's just uh it's just noise, it's meaningless.

Pay attention to what's actually going on and like actually think about it, you know?

Now, does that mean Trump or MAGA is going to bring communism?

No, and no.

If I thought that, I wouldn't believe in 2036.

I care more about Joe Sims than I care about Trump or Biden.

You know, Joe Sims is more relevant to me than either of them.

But

I'm just trying to say that

There's no such thing as politically neutral space anymore in America.

You can't just

You know, you can't just derive a political position from a vacuum.

You can't derive it just from an ideology or just from a the you know, an ideological pretension, like, Oh, I'm a communist, so I'm just gonna create communist politics based on this doctrine or this idea.

It's like that there's but there's no like political vacuum in the first place where that can be crafted in a way that's uh pure and untouched by re by w the actual partisan orientation of political reality itself, you know?

So it's like

Um

Like let let me just like fucking simplify it.

Like long story short, all right?

You're out having beers with your co-workers.

One of them's a fucking lip tard and one of them has a Trump hat on.

You can have whatever fucking nuances you want, but if you're an American communist, you're probably you're you're gonna be on the side of and you're gonna be lumped in with and categorized as the same as the MAGA guy.

That's all I'm trying to say.

I'm not saying you agree with him on everything or even most things.

I'm not saying you share his the details of his worldview.

I'm saying, in terms of what you represent politically for America, like you're lumped in with that.

And that doesn't that's not an indictment.

on the extent to which you have similar politics with that guy.

It's an indictment on the extent to which uh neoliberal politics, liberal, NAFO, NATO politics has become completely intolerant of any dissenting position, such that if you're any kind of dissident whatsoever, you're just going to be lumped in the same category of you're a political partisan.

It's like we're being ruled by a Nazi occupation and they're ju they don't say, Oh, we're here to kill the Communists or we're here to kill the you know, the MAGA people no, it's we're here to kill the partisans.

Hunt down the partisans with, you know, hunting dogs and and and root them out and, you know, anti partisan operations.

Like, that's how that's what we're facing right now, you know?

And that's all I'm trying to say.

I'm not saying that.

You know, we should relinquish our duty as communists and just dissolve ourselves into the MAGA movement completely.

Like, no, we need to build our own political authority based on communism, based on proletarian politics, based on a party for the working class.

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

But

When we build that party

When we take over that party,

We are not going to be operating in politically neutral space.

We're going to be operating in political space that has already been bent and warped in a specific way.

And we have to understand where we stand in relationship to that.

And it's like, oh, the pain of being Haas.

It's just like, I'm so misunderstood.

I'm so fundamentally misunderstood.

I don't think the United States of America is going to survive.

You think I think Trump is going to save it?

I don't think the United States is still going to be around for very much longer.

I think this country is going to balkanize into a civil war.

I'm just trying to say let's integrate MAGA into the future, not stay in MAGA.

MAGA is gonna be dead too, but are we gonna be post-maga or pre-maga?

I believe in being post-maga.

It's the struggle for American popular sovereignty.

You know, as far as Trump's indictment is concerned or him being found guilty on all these charges, uh

I don't know what to tell you.

Like, shouldn't we do something about this?

And I'm like, no, I think you should do nothing and then you'll win.

Like look, spare me the fucking outrage.

I I find it hard to sympathize with like moral outrage over this when it's like, okay, well, what about?

how the government was like killing people.

and shit.

Like, what about that?

Or like what about all these like elections and primaries they rigged?

What about these foreign wars?

What about how Trump himself killed Solimani?

It's like, dude, I'm sorry.

Like, I don't give a fuck what happens to Trump on a personal level.

I don't care if, like, if Trump was executed by firing squad, like, I wouldn't give a fuck.

Like, it'd be kind of sad because he's such a funny, likable guy in terms of his personality and entertainment value.

But, like, dude, that guy killed Solimani and he brags about it.

I don't have any personal sympathy with him on a political level.

I straight up don't.

You know, this is a brutal world.

And I'm not saying that because I'm like a liberal who's like.

Oh, Trump is like, I don't.

I don't.

I'm not offended by Trump in any way.

But it's a brutal.

It's more like, it's more like this is a world of mafia bosses, and I'm a mafia boss, but he's also a mafia boss.

And if he gets whacked, I'm like, well, welcome to the jungle.

This is the Wild West.

We're all going to get whacked out here soon enough.

Um.

I don't want to be sentimental about it, is all.

I'm just, I refuse to be sentimental about it.

I refuse to be like, whatever the fuck this is and like aestheticize and romanticize the injustice of the situation.

I'm kind of more like, this is the Wild West.

Welcome to reality.

That's my thing.

My thing is more like welcome to reality.

And I welcome people's political awakening.

I'm not here to undercut that and deny the political awakening that could come with this.

People really awaken to the rotten nature of the occupation we face.

But

Uh, I'm not here to like let's not pretend like we are surprised by this.

Can we just agree on that?

Let's not pretend that this is like a shocking thing.

Like, oh my god, this is so crazy.

It's kind of more like, yeah, it was to be expected, straight up.

Um, I mean, we should we should be very responsive to the consciousness of the masses on this matter.

We should be very responsive to that and to take into consideration how this will shape and affect their consciousness and not smugly look down at them, Oh, I'm so much smarter than you, because that's not what I'm saying.

I'm kind of more like saying.

Let's draw concrete conclusions.

You know, let's focus on multipolarity.

Let's focus on, you know.

American communism.

Let's focus on free America from the occupation, which this is just a minor example of.

Let's focus on uh

The system objectively is going to collapse and we need to be responsive to that.

You know, let's focus on, you know, what we need to focus on is we need.

We need to educate more young people.

About the need

To

Understand how the world works, how America works.

We need to we need to inspire people to cultivate the excellent people, right, communist consciousness.

Because we're gonna need all the people we could because once we actually have our own organization slash party.

That's how we're going to be able to intervene in American politics and respond to it on a political level.

For now, all we can have is an analysis.

All we can do is analyze the situation.

Yeah.

Um post-MAGA politics is Xi Jinping thought.

Xi Jinping, see Mago is shocking and crazy in America.

But in China, it's

Much more primitive.

than Xi Jinping thought already is in terms of how extremely it totally like goes beyond anything liberalism can explain.

Like, Xi Jinping thought is a million times more surreal than MAGA is, okay?

It's like the norm in China is political surrealism is the norm in communist states.

Political surrealism is the norm in Russia.

In America, political surrealism is this crazy shocking thing that, you know, Adam Curtis is doing.

I can't believe this is the problem with the British, honestly.

Um, not to knock on the not the British, but these like liberal and Anglo-Atlantic intellectuals, pseudo-intellectuals, are like, I can't believe Trump won.

Brexit and Trump is so surreal, it's so shocking, it's the normal, there's no more normal anymore.

What is going on?

And I'm like, shut the fuck up, okay?

Um.

You know, like it's not really that shocking when you're a Marxist-Leninist and you're a Stalinist.

How about that?

It's really not that fucking shocking when you're straight up a licenquoist.

Okay, Trump is not this shocking, crazy thing that's changing the normal.

Okay, then we are here to accelerate that process far beyond.

anything that can be presently be comprehended, right?

So yeah.

That those are my brief comments on these uh events.

Uh and you know that the sad thing is that there's uh you know people think like oh this is gonna rouse people into action.

And it's like that's exactly what they're waiting for people to do, you know?

Like, that's exactly what they want.

They're trying to provoke.

I mean, they're ready for it.

They're ready to impose martial law, just like Alex Jones was talking about.

Like the regime is ready to execute Order 6.

No, that would be base.

I was gonna say execute order 66, but that was actually cool.

By the way, Order 66 from Star Wars, that was when the CIA and the security regime apparatus and all these think tanks and NGOs were just executed by firing squad, by regime forces.

That was Order 66, and it was a great thing.

It was the destruction of the deep state.

That's what the Jedi were: a bunch of deep state pedophiles.

Anyway,.

But the the regime is ready to suspend the constitution completely and resort to Hitlerian emergency dictatorship powers.

And they're waiting for an excuse for that.

We need to be long more long-term in our outlook.

We need to think about de-dollarization.

We need to think about BRICS.

We need to think about geopolitics.

We need to have a more worldly perspective.

We need to kind of think about things.

You know, don't shut off Fox News and you know how we need to think about

political punditry is like cli it's like Adam Sandler's click.

Just fucking click the fast forward button because like it's so predictable.

Like if I'm literally clicking fast forward right now, watching all these fucking

Dissident right intellectuals just like say the most predictable possible vain shit and it having no effect on anything.

Just fast forward, fast forward.

You know, we already know the outcome, so just fast forward.

Um

Yeah.

I want to get to the part of the movie that I don't that I haven't watched yet.

I want to get to that part.

I want to get to the part that I can't fast forward because it's happening live.

If you ever had like uh

you know, cable T V in its most advanced form.

Remember how like you could pause and then you could fast forward it, but then it would stop at a certain point because like eventually you would get to the live

The live broadcast, right?

So, like, that's what we need to do.

We need to actually get to the live broadcast of America's political reality right now.

So, fast forward through all this political discourse and punditry and shit, and think at the level of live TV.

Think at the level of live TV, you're thinking at the level of de-dollarization, you're thinking about the 34 trillion in debt, you're thinking about the long-term prospect of the dissolution of the United States, you're thinking about

bricks.

You're thinking about uh Russia and China and Xi Jinping thought and you're thinking about Michael Hudson.

You know, that's what it means to think at the level of live T V, not this uh Comcast

fast forwarding through uh

John Doyle

Fuck, I hate these retard conservatives.

I just like, they're so fucking stupid.

Fucking retard.

Anyway, I hate swearing.

Aztec, what's up?

What's up Aztec?

Thanks for the five.

You know, yeah, they're all fucking cringe, all of them.

I don't like any of 'em.

The dissident right.

There's no dissident right.

The dissident right, the dissident right.

How about the fucking Paul Pott left?

Is a CNN guy watching me?

I swear I'm just joking about the mass grave shit.

It's just a joke, alright?

Did I talk about putting all these people in mass graves?

Hopefully not, right?

If I did, it was literally a joke, okay?

Anyway, um

Anyway, let me continue.

I'm a dissident right.

I'm I you know, guys, let's talk about political strategy.

You don't have any fucking power, your voice is meaningless.

These people are like whores.

They're just s they're they're here to seduce Peter Thiel and all these billionaires.

That's all they exist to do is they're just whores.

You ever you realize that?

Berrio, what's up?

Like these people only exist.

These people only exist to basically like

Influence already powerful people.

But I'm here to actually be a powerful person.

Like at the minimum, I want to be a warlord in this country.

I'm not here to be like some guy in a fucking fedora influencing policy.

I want to I don't want to.

I'm an aspiring warlord.

I'm an aspiring American warlord.

And I you know, I can hold just like a small county somewhere and be the warlord of that county.

And I'll have a big fur pelt.

And um

And then, you know, when the proletarian dictatorship is consolidated, I'll retire, you know, and hopefully in that county they'll b build a statue of me or something for having liberated it.

But I'm not here to be a dissident right intellectual.

Um

Okay, I'm uh you know, if you didn't understand the meaning of what I just said, the meaning is this.

No, I'm not wanna be a fucking warlord.

The meaning what I'm trying to say is, we are here to actually build a form of political power and authority from scratch.

Not in the sense of like with devoid of context in a vacuum, but from scratch in the sense of like we don't need to take Peter Thiel's fucking money.

We don't need to cozy up with like all these established right-wing.

We will build it from scratch.

We're not gonna fuck.

We're not gonna respect the Republican Party or the Democratic Party or any other party.

We're gonna build our own.

I don't need to respect Ben Shapiro just because he has fucking millions of dollars behind him.

I don't need to respect Jordan Peterson just because some billionaire is farting out cash in his direction.

I don't need to respect.

the political discourse, when it's primarily based in some billionaire just shitting and queefing out money in some direction, willy nilly.

We are Marxist Leninists who are going to derive

A scientific and ironclad political authority based on

an objective relationship to the people and to the masses.

Okay?

We're not here to just tail behind and be these gossip queens.

We're not gossip queens.

You know, that's the John Doy.

Oh my God, I'm going to throw shade as shut the fuck up.

Political pundit is a whore.

That's what a political pundit is.

I'm going to gossip about these people who are already powerful.

All these old men in Congress and the Senate.

Why should I respect them?

Give me one reason I should respect them.

Well, because they're getting elected.

How anyone could do that?

I don't fucking respect these elections.

I don't give a shit about them.

Fuck all these old people in uh Congress.

in the House and the Senate.

Like they can all

Um

You know, I don't want to say something, it'll get me in trouble, but like, you know, look, I don't respect them.

I'm not an intern.

I'm not an intern.

I don't have an intern brain.

A lot of these young political pundits, they're just a bunch of intern.

All these bap people, they're just a bunch of fucking interns for Lindsey Graham or some shit.

Like, they have this respect for Lindsey Graham because he's already in power.

And I'm like, but I'm in the Wild West and this whole system's gonna break down and we're gonna build our own power and authority from scratch.

Ask Chairman Mao where actual political power comes from.

When shit hits the fan in this country and law and order breaks down.

I promise you, I promise you, lesbian Graham is going to be hiding in a fucking bunker somewhere.

Anyone who's invoking lesbian Graham's authority.

You know these people try to talk down on us because they're in bed with these Republic.

I'm an intern for some old guy.

Yeah, you're like, yeah, you have a pederast, you're a victim of pederastry.

I mean, you're not a minor, but that's the relationship going on.

It's some old man, and you are their pederast slave.

And you're bragging about it making it seem like you're better than we are.

We're here to build uh a Khanate in America.

Purely built from scratch, authority, power,

From scratch.

What do I mean by from scratch?

I don't mean literally from scratch.

I don't mean purely uh, you know, by force.

I mean like true tribal authority.

You know, that's what we want.

And that that means we have to be mature and humble ourselves to the masses.

And they're

The communal logic of the masses.

To really be a tribal authority doesn't just mean you have the biggest gun.

It means you're respected in a community.

It means people put their trust and faith in you.

It means they see you as a leader.

It means you're able to lead them.

It means you're responsive toward them.

It means you have insight into their wisdom.

It means you yourself are wise, right?

I'm not talking about some reckless Far Cry 5 stuff.

I'm just saying.

I'm talking about some Mao stuff.

Put it that way.

You know?

Anyway, how crazy do I sound right now, guys?

Anyway, guys, see y'all Sunday.

Because we're going to wrap it up.

'Cause I have nothing else to say on this.

I hope you guys took away the right kind of message from this though.

Um

Like I hope you get it, you know?

I hope you actually understand.

Mm-hmm.