DESTROYING VAUSH [2021-12-04]

2021-12-05
[Music]
me
[Music]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
is
[Music]
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
uh
[Music]
[Music]
i
[Music]
easy
[Music]
[Music]
is
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
is
[Music]
[Β __Β ]
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
[Music]
tonight you are gonna witness for this
fifth time
fall of the fat ass
fall of the fat ass
[Music]
and this is going on the youtube too
this is also going on the youtube
the fat ass must fall
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
[Music]
foreign
then you grew up
[Music]
okay
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
we believe
[Music]
oh
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
uh
[Applause]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Applause]
[Music]
catching all the lights
just easy as abc that's how we made
[Applause]
[Music]
the rest of that song [Β __Β ] sucks
[Music]
is
[Music]
[Music]
thank you sir
[Music]
[Music]
thank you brandon
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
me
[Music]
uh
[Music]
easy
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
um
[Music]
starting from here
let's make a promise
you and me
let's just be honest we are gonna run
nothing can stop us even the night and
falls all around us
[Music]
from the airfield
[Music]
this one's going on the youtube guys
this one's going on the youtube
the fat ass challenged me again uh
hiding behind his own stream remember
this fat [Β __Β ] still refuses to debate me
um still running away from a debate
keep that in
always mind
[Music]
boston's a [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
he's a [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
he talks so much [Β __Β ]
and he won't even [Β __Β ] that if you're
gonna talk this much [Β __Β ] why don't you
debate me
you [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] you fat [Β __Β ] you fat
[Β __Β ]
[Music]
is
so
[Music]
[Music]
is
[Music]
me
[Music]
me
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
up
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
[Music]
food
[Music]
okay so some background information
right
um
[Music]
so i was browsing twitch
and so as it happens valsh was covering
my debate with uh
that hakee guy right
and he covered the whole thing right
and uh he was talking all this [Β __Β ]
about me saying all this [Β __Β ]
commentating on the debate in an
extremely dishonest well what do you
expect he's a fat lying [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
but
i'm gonna demonstrate to you
i've done this before but it's so easy
to just [Β __Β ] on vouch it's so easy to
[Β __Β ] dunk on this dumb [Β __Β ] fat
[Β __Β ] dumbass right
but we're gonna do it anyway right
because uh
i guess some things are in need of
clarification
i can't stand looking at this [Β __Β ]
disgusting job of the hud just sick
[Β __Β ]
absolute [Β __Β ]
bottom of the barrel scum of society
malformed looking [Β __Β ]
right but we're gonna have to today
we're gonna have to commit to doing that
because i'm gonna defend myself
and i want to preface this so you guys
have the background knowledge of the
fact
that the fat [Β __Β ] coward vows
to this very day
is running from debating me he doesn't
want to debate me i've ambushed him once
and i gave him ptsd he learned from that
yeah i'm not somebody you want to [Β __Β ]
with bosh i make you look like a dumb
[Β __Β ] if you debate me one-on-one
and he knows that right
uh he's been avoiding any kind of
confrontation with me he's been on the
run right i caught him once
he said hulk could do the emmy i dm'd
him and
no show right
he is absolutely terrified of me but did
he spend so much time out of context
talking about me
i want there's some ogs in this chat
right it wasn't really that long ago
when infrared was nothing we were just
what 20 people
it wasn't so long ago
and i remember ambushing bosch and
boston you know what no free clown i'm
not giving he said i'm not giving a guy
any clown and you watch him die off
watch him die off you gotta get he's
gonna have no clout
and he just keeps talking about me now
because
i'm continuing to grow in relevance and
significance right like infrared is a
thing it's a thing now right
boss said that if he doesn't give me
attention
i'm just going to become irrelevant that
hasn't happened
actually the the inverse is happening
bosch's metrics his stats are plummeting
and they're not just slowing they're
actually going down
right
this guy's becoming irrelevant
and one of the main reasons why uh
boss is becoming irrelevant is because
even the the main the bread tube is dead
bread tubes [Β __Β ] dead already right
they're all moving and becoming ml's now
right
they're becoming a fake type of ml but
that's the move now that's like the new
orientation is becoming ml
uh breadth done the end of an era
and we moved on to a new one but
you know i really find it interesting
that this fat ass is commenting on my uh
hockey debate
as if people like him or his audience
fit anywhere in the equation of why i
would go and debate hockey i've i've
turned my back on you lefties right i've
turned my back on you right
you have nothing to do with this
i am
reaching out to the people you left
behind right
and obviously hake himself is a dumb
[Β __Β ] he's just some random dumbass but
he commands
a big enough audience
for him to be relevant in some capacity
[Music]
it's not about hake it's about his
audience those are the people i'm
speaking to
you lefties have nothing to do with this
you i you are dead to me like i don't
consider you even
a thing you're not even existing to me
right
you're yesterday's news there's no
future for you there's absolutely no
[Β __Β ] future for you where you left
these right
what do you have to do with this
like as if i'm participating in a
discourse with you when i'm debating
hakee and i'm i'm in your discourse no
you are dead to me you are absolutely
[Β __Β ] nothing you are nothing
you are less than nothing
you're not relevant you're not
politically relevant you have no
potential you have no potential in you
you have no significance you have no
you don't fit anywhere in a strategy of
reviving a communist movement in this
country you don't fit anywhere in that
your discourse shove it up your ass
you know
i'm not part of your discourse i'm not
part of your little community i'm
actually participating
uh
in the kind of discourse that ordinary
regular americans
find
themselves capable of purchase debating
in as a communist i'm going in the ring
as a communist alone
i don't have your little discourse
behind my back and and i'm speaking on
behalf of you guys [Β __Β ] you guys
i'm
reviving communism from scratch
right as a
thing so it's really weird when these
people are are commenting on this debate
when it's like what do you you guys have
nothing to do with it right
you're not my audience you're not the
intended audience
you're not the people i'm trying to to
speak to or have a dialogue with or
conversation with you don't figure
anywhere in that you may as well not
exist at all you may as well just
disappear and there would be no
difference right
but in all their narcissism
they think it's about them and they
think it's about their discourse so that
how's the saying something no no you're
you're dead to me you're nothing i i am
acting as if you didn't even exist right
because you basically don't politically
but you still make it about yourself
somehow right
you still somehow managed to make it
about yourself you are politically dead
you are politically dead you have no
future politically
in this country
just like how i said bread tube has no
future and what do you know breadtube's
a dead thing now right what does bread
do tell me what bread tube is now
concert points she doesn't even make
videos
anymore really she makes one video a
year and she she's taking the money and
she's running with it making one video a
year then what else is there
can someone explain to me what bread
tube is
the dgg
the
dgg do you call them
the house of dgg
has overtaken these these lefties right
uh some of the bread two people got
banned off twitch
right thought slime he's a nobody
oh the serfs they're big on twitter not
much else
all their stats have completely declined
like drastically declined
so brett dude's dead it's a dead
phenomenon
[Music]
um all that's left is vouch right
but vash is hated by the left that's the
thing
pouch right now may as well be a uh
a right winger
he is not welcome by the american left
they all [Β __Β ] hate that guy that fat
[Β __Β ]
right
but it's interesting that you know
all the american leftists hate vouch
they hate him they hate that [Β __Β ] guy
so he's not relevant in the left anymore
so bret tube's dead right it's a dead
thing
[Music]
yeah the right obviously doesn't want
him either so what's left for vows
i'll tell you what's left faush is
cornered from all sides he's in circle
and he's worse than us
because while we have every political
faction against us we also have a lot of
people sympathetic to us a political
people
uh conservatives whatever they're very
we're we have that pipeline in place we
have a very working pipeline in place
to win those people over
vouch is isolated he can't win anyone
over
and the whole of the left hates him
vosh's whole stick has been leveraging
the power of the left in this country to
win over the neo-nazis from fortune and
all neo-nazis you can still preserve
your white supremacy and your white
purity yes we're superior to all those
brown and black people whatever with our
liberalism and our freedoms we just want
to give you more freedom like the right
to comb and unlimited access to uh
fat chicks or whatever i don't know what
he's saying right but
and and uh furries and stuff right
whatever
[Music]
so he bribed the right wingers by sent
by with uh
with sex with the promise of sex right
you can be poly unlimited uh
satisfaction
and gratification
no limits
so he won over the most degenerate scum
the most dishonorable degenerate scum
from the right wing
those were the people he was able to win
over
[Music]
for a time
that pipeline is over it's shut down
because brett cube's dead so he's not
winning those people over anymore
and i guess they realize that
you know being a leftist doesn't
actually get you [Β __Β ] and i'm telling
you guys the truth right now
you don't want to hear this i'll tell
you the truth
you're way more likely to get [Β __Β ] as a
right-winger than a leftist
just telling you the truth i'm a leftist
dude by the way
i'm a real leftist but in this country
[Β __Β ] don't like leftist men
all the [Β __Β ] you like that are
leftists
they're with mega guys right wingers
don't believe me
find out yourself the hard way
[Music]
a lot of guys become leopards to get
liberal [Β __Β ] they don't get [Β __Β ] they
don't get any [Β __Β ] the most they get
the most they get
is they become
the support friend
that's bribed with some [Β __Β ] in an
exclusive relationship right but you're
not really treated as a man in that
relationship
and you're very much whipped and you
don't wear the pants in that
relationship by the way and she's
cheating on you right that's what
leftist men get
you be like a little [Β __Β ] a little beta
a friend
and maybe she'll [Β __Β ] you once like
every three months
but that's it right that's what left
this leftist men get telling you the
truth
everything i've ever gotten as a matter
of fact
was because of my conservative muslim
background
i've never gotten any being a leftist
though the most disgusting repulsive
thing to women is a male leftist 1 000
it's the conservative muslim side of me
or arab whatever you want to call it
side of me that women liked right that i
had
anything with it's never the the leftist
[Β __Β ]
hey i'm a communist i'm a leftist
no do a political people get [Β __Β ] yeah
yeah they do
absolutely they do
as a matter of fact the more political
you are the less likely you're getting
any you know that's the truth
as it should be for god's sake as it
should be
imagine using your [Β __Β ] politics as a
as a as a replacement for your
personalities you know but that's what
left is due
hassan is the ultimate cope
because he's the one like exception
but even he's slid off right after years
of being poisoned by it
[Music]
you're not going to be the turkish model
hassan okay
i'm sorry i don't know why that's giving
so many leftist dudes hope that if they
become leftists they're gonna get [Β __Β ]
no dude you're not gonna be like a son i
promise
look
unless you look like hassan and you
literally are a sex icon like asanas
just just physically like when you take
instagram pictures and [Β __Β ] you gotta
have game and guess what hassan has no
game he's got no game at all the dude
has zero zero game
[Music]
he's literally like a mannequin right
he's got none so unless you look like a
sign you gotta have game
and and there's no one who's a no
leftist man's got game i'm telling you
the truth
you don't want to hear this [Β __Β ] i'm
telling you the truth
i'm telling you the truth
[Music]
trust me please trust me
a lot of these girls they're leftists in
public
and you'd think you'd think they would
hate
they would hate a guy like me
you'd think they would hate a guy like
me right
or even more right a right winger
whatever
you'd think they hate that right
[Music]
if only you knew
if only you knew
for god's sake if only you [Β __Β ] knew
you guys think i'm joking right now how
many of you think i'm joking or i'm like
i'm like i'm using rhetoric or something
like i'm telling you the [Β __Β ] truth
i'm trying to help you and i'm telling
you the truth
[Music]
so anyway the point being
bosh is worse he's in a worse position
than us
yeah he's bigger than us right now
but his pipeline to grow an audience is
completely shut off right
he's not pulling anything from lefties
they all hate him and he's not any
longer pulling anything from right
wingers
i'm getting way more uh
right wingers way more
way way more way way more
[Music]
way more
and more political people i'm getting
more apolitical people because of my uh
charm charisma and i'm getting more
right wingers right
[Music]
[Music]
is
[Music]
are you finished destroying we haven't
even begun
we haven't be gone we have not begun
matter of fact let's just get right into
it
and you're getting the theory nerds as
well yeah let's get right into it
wash the fat ass
hold on
why is this always so difficult
i think when we have a discussion uh
about
the over putting a overall historical
verdict on judging the legacy of
communism i do agree that when we're
talking about communism we do have to
talk about what that actually meant in
reality so this idea that you know
communism has never been tried or it
wasn't true communism bro it doesn't
actually reflect the real thing
i think we don't have to that's not
something that has to be in dispute we
can all agree that communism
specifically in the 20th century refers
to a phenomena that begins with the
soviet union continuing through
countries like china
um other countries
in uh the world outside of europe in
america
and the eastern bloc and so on and so on
legacy of capital c communist movements
uh within uh the united states
and western europe and so on so i think
there's no dispute about the fact that
communism does have to refer to the you
know the thing that actually projects
the name into relevance and significance
in the first place
and to me
uh when you begin from there you have to
have a very honest and sober assessment
of the the record and the facts at hand
now the experience of communism was
obviously very bloody it was obviously
uh something that was fraught with
catastrophes to say the least economic
catastrophes uh famines um moments of
political terror and so on and so on but
we should have a more broader uh
investigation and criticism of whether
this is specifically because of
communism rather than so i want you to
understand the angle i was coming at
with with hawk right i don't give a [Β __Β ]
about hawk personally whatever how do
you ever say hey personally
um
i don't know the guy i don't i didn't
even know who that guy was right but
from from what i can see
and this is something i'm going to keep
returning to right
um
as far as his audience is concerned
yeah it would be easy for me to go hard
on hock and you know call him a beta and
and you know go hard on him like i did
with the cans cup guy and go full
genghis khan or whatever
but
what good would that do
like this is a guy who thrives off of
polarization right
and it's not that i'm trying to
extinguish all polarization it's just
i'm trying to
um re-ground the polarization right
sure i could just be extremely combative
and hostile to the guy or i could be
very respectful and be a human being
and not be affected by his provocations
and i think that would end up in the
eyes of his audience making me look a
lot better in the eyes of undecided
people as well making me look a lot
better and objectively that is actually
what happened i kept my cool the whole
time i was very reasonable
and it was so beautiful because we were
able to end it with
this guy hawk is a psycho see this is
how it works with lefties when they go
into these debates with conservatives
they go full psychopath first so then it
becomes a question do i want to be a
normal person or do i want to be this
psycho right
bomba duke shut the [Β __Β ] up or you're
banned forever
shut the [Β __Β ] up or i perma-ban you in
my chat i've seen that comment the
50th time now shut the [Β __Β ] up or i
perma-banned you okay
anyway
um yeah i could go full cycle but
then
normal people would side with hawk now
how did i actually end the debate
if you want to agree with hawk you have
to be pro-slavery you have to say
slavery wasn't bad
yeah sorry that's not a normal position
in america okay so
you know what i mean
it's not a normal position so
he ended up looking very unreasonable
and ridiculous
and i ended up looking very sensible and
normal right
so
optically that was a major w for me
right but
um
the reason i don't want to upload it to
the youtube is because i prefer it to be
a video that's only in the enemy
territory i don't want to use it to rile
up my audience
because what are we doing we're beating
a dead horse by you know being riled up
against hawk or right wingers that's
that's really why i tend not to uh
focus on the fight against right wingers
as far as my audience is concerned
it because what's the point those are
the people we have to win over because
like i told you we are not going to win
leftists
we're not going to win over leftists
right
um that pipeline is shut off so those
are the only people we can draw from
those people and apolitical people who
might be sympathetic to their ideas and
remember apolitical people go with a
normal and reasonable person the reason
people overwhelmingly side with jordan
peterson over that whatever
channel four whatever that that woman
was was not because they're they're
inherently right-wing and they have that
right-wing ideological constructs that
are influencing their mind no it's
because peterson appeared like the
sensible normal one and she appeared way
out of left field right
so
you know
i don't know i mean
i would understand the criticism if it
wasn't working but it is working so
where does your criticism come from if
what i'm doing is actually working
and it's actually effective it's like
proven to be effective it's what's grown
me as as big as it has
like
i don't know what
what is the criticism then really you
know
but it's not really that i'm
it's it's not even so much that like i'm
just i'm just hiding my real views to
win over the right wingers these are my
real views i'm wearing them on my sleeve
right it's just you have to pick and
choose your battles you have to choose
what the hill you want to die on choose
your battles do you begin with the
assumption that all of these half of the
country all of these conservatives are
just bad people to the core right or
they just have a dogmatic fixation on
bad ideas for some reason to the core or
are they actually inherently good people
or decent normal people and that this is
mostly a miscommunication that the
establishment and the elites most of all
thrive on the off of right well it's
pretty clear that the latter is the case
fifty percent of people in this country
are not evil horrible people
the whole thing is a stupid
miscommunication
that ultimately benefits the ruling
elites right why does the why do the
so-called uh blue dog democrats get away
with being able to
you know hold up
things like the infrastructure bill
because they claim to represent well we
want to want to be reasonable to the
conservatives
this whole game of polarization this
whole conflict in the united states only
serves the ruling class they're using
the conservatives as an excuse to hold
up something that would otherwise be
overwhelmingly popular with those same
conservatives right it's a [Β __Β ] game
this is why an idealist point of view by
the way the idea that all political
conflict in the united states is about
clashing ideas serves the interests of
the ruling class if it's just a matter
of ideas then it's set conservatives
have the right wing ideas democrats have
the left-wing ideas and ideas cannot be
uh
there are distinctions in between ideas
right those that can't really be bridged
idea is an idea a is a right
but if it's not based it's not about
ideas and it's about material interests
then all you need is the correct
ideas and the correct speech and the
correct manners of expression in order
to unite material interests so material
interests can be united
and can overcome ideological differences
but if you think that the differences
are based on ideology
then how are you going to overcome
ideological differences you can't right
only only a materialist could believe
that
material reality is more fundamental
than you know ideas and ideologies
a feature of modernity as such because
the modernization of let's say even the
western uh capitalist countries and the
world at large uh fits the same pattern
that we saw if not [Β __Β ] worse
actually
in the case of comedy there we go okay
i've said this before
with um with infrared um and this is i
guess like it's really embarrassing that
a lot of people didn't understand this
when first listening to him but
uh i infrared's main strategy as an
interlocutor is not understanding what
any words mean
so he he does he he it's funnily enough
like he he does almost the sam harris
kind of thing
what
why do why do like uh
why do these like anglo-saxon i don't
know what they're the analytic
philosophy people i don't know where the
background is coming from why do they
always insist on making it about
language instead of the content of the
language it's like you are so dogmatic
about how you use words that you
couldn't possibly
entertain the idea that words can be
used in ways that don't fit your
preconceived
uh world view
like this is where the lazy fat ass
walsh is
he's basically saying
let's say val said the sky is um the sky
is purple and you said no the sky is
blue
and he said you are you don't understand
what words mean
no we actually just disagree about the
substantive content
involving those words it's not that i
don't know what the sky is
it's that you are fundamentally wrong
when you say that the sky is purple i'm
saying it's blue
so can you engage with the content of my
speech instead of focusing on language
or no well he can't because
he thinks words i guess he thinks the
meaning of words is pegged
to his um dogmas and prejudices that he
has that the burden of him still remains
on to prove the validity of he hasn't
proven why his use of words is more
correct than mine he just thinks it's
self-evident because he's a fat lazy
[Β __Β ] much in the same way he thinks
his body is is just self-evident he
could just sit on his chair all day and
he won't become a job of the vows right
he's just content with that
or the jordan peterson kind of thing
where he will
express absolute [Β __Β ] nonsense
the biggest way to bluff thank you
frieza s-u-n-g-o-r-i-l
thank you frieza the biggest way to
bluff and and cop out of
um having your ideas challenged by
someone is just saying that what they're
saying is meaningless because if you say
it's just meaningless
you know
that is a complete
uh just it's just a complete barrier to
any communication it's a complete
barrier to any discourse you're just
saying nope it's meaningless and then
you can contend yourself with your
prejudices and ideas about the world
being correct it's a way to shut off any
criticism basically right it's a cop-out
but it's also a bluff right because
he's making it seem like the reason he's
saying it's meaningless
um
is because there's no meaning in it
rather than
were i to engage this it would seriously
upset and challenge my preconceived
um notions of what the world is and its
history and how it works and so on and
so on right so it's a bluff it's like
entertain for a moment that there's some
meaning to what i'm saying
but you hold your own doing that could
you survive doing that could you debate
me pray tell no you [Β __Β ] couldn't so
you say it's meaningless
um to save yourself to save your sen
limited sense of meaning from ever being
scrutinized right
um
but with like cycling through words that
sound vaguely
marxian
um but but he he understands the
language as well as a person who doesn't
speak english who's pantomiming the
sounds they've heard on tv you know
okay can you prove it can you prove you
know anything about marxism every single
thing i've ever heard you say about
marxism has no spaces in any
marxist text everything you've ever said
about marx is nowhere to be found in
anything marx ever wrote so
can you
what do you what can you prove what
you're saying can you back it up
substantively like
what you're just gonna say it's
meaningless is it really that easy you
fat lazy [Β __Β ]
what if i just said what you said right
now is meaningless welsh what you just
said is meaningless there's no meaning
you're just using words you're just
using words i'm sorry bosh i didn't
understand what you said you're just
using leftist words but it has no
meaning is this really the epitome of
[Β __Β ]
criticism is this really vaush like
challenging me or something like this is
what i'm up against this is just easy
the prerequisites to the agricultural
and industrial modernization of the
non-communist world uh required in an
immense level of um by the way what i
said is actually like very much
it's very lucid right what i said was
all of the horrors we associate with
communism are common to the
historical phenomena of modernization
even in the west
all modernization
shares in common
these characteristics of you know famine
and whatever and and terror and so on
that was what i was saying now if you
disagree with that you can try to
challenge it on the basis of the content
of what i said but can you really sit
here and say what i said is meaningless
i actually challenge any vows supporter
who may be lurking in my chat
can you actually
sustain the perspective that what i said
there was meaningless and that it was
just it was just using words that
sounded marxist but there was no meaning
to them they're just using words and
mimicking words really there's no like
meaningful pattern or rhyme or rhythm to
what i said at all can you really
sustain that perspective
you couldn't
you absolutely could not
famines uh social instability terror
unrest um colonialism slavery and so on
and so on
these are all things that aren't um that
can't be brushed to the side when we're
evaluating um how modernization takes
place
uh historically so to me you have to
place communism within that context of
this question of pre-modern and largely
agrarian societies confronting and
trying to persevere through this
challenge of modernity and to me uh
modernity specifically in the form of
agricultural modernization somehow
historically inevitably leads to this
kind of um chaos
and in the way the foundation of economy
what is he talking about who knows
did you guys find it hard to follow i
mean you guys are just random chatters
this is a content creator with 400 000
views who postures as some like debate
lord intellectual titan and he he can't
parse and follow what i was saying
guys i want you to
understand how like ominous this really
is
and this is something that's going to be
a recurring theme throughout this entire
video that we're going to watch right
which may take the whole stream who
knows
but
when you realize that i'm a guy right
now i only got 14 000 followers on
twitch i only have
the 12
000 subscribers on youtube
wait i'm actually right though right
isn't that a bit ominous like shouldn't
i be wrong
like if he's right
if he's wrong but he's the one who has
way more subscribers than me
and i imagine twitch followers as well
it's like do you know how foreboding it
is that he's this incorrect and his uh
analysis of me like you know how like
how ominous that is even for me as the
guy who benefits from it it's still a
bit like
wow take it easy it's like i didn't know
i was the chosen one and i'm gonna be
have like what 2 million subscribers or
something like chill you know
like this is a guy who's like wait he
has a way bigger audience than me he's
just like this wrong how how can that
happen right
it's actually kind of uh
it's a bit unsettling that a guy could
be this stupid
and actually have this big of an
audience like and i'm not even saying
this in like a combative
rhetorical way like i'm speaking from a
neutral impartial objective point of
view this is genuinely a stupid fat [Β __Β ]
this is genuinely a stupid guy who is
just does not knowledgeable on like the
bare minimum of marxism 101 or history
101 like genuinely a stupid [Β __Β ] guy
it actually feels like idiocracy you
know an idiocracy when you're looking
around and it's like you know people who
who who you don't expect to be stupid
actually are really
like
like actual stupid [Β __Β ] people are in
like in power or something it's like
wait what
i feel like a genius right now is this
is it this is this it
this is the vows
this is the debate lord val she's super
intellectual and smart
what world am i [Β __Β ] living on you
know this is actually a dumb guy
that means agriculture's um
is preserved right so this is obviously
something fraught with several you know
small mistakes can lead to catastrophic
outcomes but at the very least we can
say that these mistakes were on record
things that communist states learn from
uh after they were made very quickly
already lost there's nothing to be lost
about guys you're not you're not lost
okay you're trying to find a path
through a bowl of spaghettios okay hold
on hate and infra are are both wait what
what the [Β __Β ] are you talking about it's
like
how how has i said not lucid you can try
and disagree with it and challenge what
i said but what kind of fat [Β __Β ] just
says it's meaningless you can try if you
don't agree with it you can try and
challenge what i said but how much of a
[Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] do you have to be to
posture with the pretense that what i
said has no meaning either you're so
fundamentally uneducated
that's just not familiar with any of
those like fifth grade level words i was
using
or you're a fat [Β __Β ] who's just too
scared to venture into uncharted
territory discursively
i think it's a combination of both
both um phenomenal characters so i have
no doubt as time
passes you know this will go back and
forth hey for what it's worth though i
don't actually think that infra is
stupid um take is very very dumb like
just very unintelligent you know just a
just a baseline level so
we'll see how that how the interplay you
know comes about clearly i should act
and when you don't only look at the
negatives that are mostly mass
publicized as a result of cold war
anti-communist propaganda and uh and
elsewhere you have to also have a fair
and sober assessment of the overwhelming
achievements of communist parties and
leading their respective peoples uh
to a position a social position far
superior uh to them before whether in
the realm of literacy acculturation and
medicine um access to a bare minimum of
a standard of living a basic dignified
means of livelihood a kind of guarantee
of a job so on its own obviously this
came to a certain limit in crisis in the
1970s where this primary standard of
living was no longer enough um to
support the wants and desires and that's
how it will happen in communist states
following this i think we can retrace
and reevaluate the original significance
of communism in order to now address and
put into a new light the challenges that
we now face today which our current
liberal order seems to be unable to you
know i i went in this not knowing who
hake was i had no [Β __Β ] idea who this
guy was right so this is something i
would say to
any critic of communism who's a right
winger i would just that that's what i
would open with i didn't know who hake
was i had no [Β __Β ] idea what the guy
was right when i realized this guy's
like um
he appeals to a more lower common
denominator of of audience i immediately
adapted to that right why would i suck
myself off and like be this like
profound intellectual when that's not
the audience i'm dealing with right if
you're dealing with a
simpler audience to be polite about it
you should dumb your arguments down and
be as simple and put
put your
um
put what you're trying to say in words
that they'll be able to understand right
you shouldn't
what good would it do for me to like
posture be like hey don't [Β __Β ] they're
just you know what they'll be like
they'll be like this is just another
satanic
lefty who's a cruel you know
unreasonable person
who benefits from that he benefits from
that ultimately right because
jake
is the guy who benefits from
polarization that's how he makes money
right that's what he how he makes a
living
but you have to ask the question is like
how is he able to draw otherwise
reasonable and normal people in right
because
well
he's able to do it
because there are grains of truth into
in the things that he says right that
people
find intuitively sensible and reasonable
um to deal with we're facing a fourth
industrial revolution we're facing an
economic transition not uh dissimilar to
the one that communists were addressing
namely the one from pre uh modern
agrarian societies to industrial
societies now we're in a situation of
industrial societies transitioning into
an era of smart cities and you know more
internet things though leftovers
decentralization
and i think that communism has a new
newfound significance uh in this regard
so i think i'll just uh end it there
whoa thank you very much that opening
statement infrared want to let you know
folks if you first time here at modern
day we are thrilled to have you here no
matter what walk of life you are from
and we are also thrilled to have here
james hague thanks so much for being
with us the floor is all yours for your
opening statement as well well thank you
and thanks to haas infrared for
coming on as well this was today was my
introduction to eyes and infrared with a
or he i think they believe i think he's
a marxist leninist and leninist
communist what is interesting to me
about him is that he does not appear as
rapidly anti-white anti-christian
anti-man as the typical communists that
i think of that i run into
i don't know looking around america like
the democrats the black lives matter
people the mainstream media types and i
saw a video where he said you can be
patriotic and and nationalist as well as
communists but i might take on power
atheistic at its root you have to be an
atheist to be a communist was one quote
from a thing imagine like being a
disgusting slimy fat [Β __Β ] who's like oh
oh you're finding common ground with
people in this country oh you're making
communism more palatable to people how
you're like
this is an objective w the fact that i'm
able to initiate this conversation and
get an audience with these people
is just an accomplishment in and of
itself right
sure you could stay in your your bread
to degenerate echo chamber where all of
the you know
the
[Music]
what do you call them
is this word allowed
what do you call it the the runt of the
litter
whatever you call that
just the the ugly disgusting people
stupid people of our society that you
know
stupid yet
entitled that spread to you can stay in
that echo chamber
you're not going to get anywhere
politically in this country and you want
to talk about clout and flex that and
[Β __Β ] well the right
just blows you out of the water in terms
of clout vows that's why you have to sit
on your stream and [Β __Β ] about joe rogan
who dwarfs you right
um in terms of their reach i mean any
one single instagram post
of theirs
will gain more it has more engagement
than the sum total of everything you've
ever [Β __Β ] produced on the internet
combined probably right so
i don't know why people like are
intimidated or feel like they have to
respect leftists even if you have 000
subscribers in the grand scheme of
things that's nothing compared to the
right the right is still
you know they have the lion's share of
attention on the internet
and that's not because big tech is in
favor of them quite the on the contrary
big tech
works against those people and and
despite that they're popular right so
what does that tell you
famous communist i think i've heard
promoting the insane idea of equality
which is not an ideal nor is it true the
serpent told eve in the garden of eden
that you can be equal with god and
that's a lie and feminist communists
have sought to be people with men and
it's just been a big mess since then
communism seems to be against men and
against nature it's
around in america is ought to render the
men unnecessary to the women and to the
children and it's it does not mind as he
said famine abortion yeah he says this
true
well speak for yourself vaush i mean
some of us are men i know you like to
use male privilege without being a man
but you just use male privilege in our
society right but you're not actually a
man you don't actually pay for it in any
way right
um
speak for yourself you're absolutely a
repulsive degenerate absolute like
you make people sick to their stomach
just by looking at you your your
ideology reflects on you
i mean you are an idiot i don't know
that i would characterize you as a man
i bet your girl would i guarantee you
any woman you've ever been interested in
your life
would see more man in me than they ever
would in you and i'll put money on that
by the way i'll actually put money on
that
do you think i'm joking by the way when
i say that you think i'm joking by the
way when i say that like all of the
women in your community your leftist
community
actually do express and show interest in
me
you don't know that right
i'm not kidding i'm not kidding about
that it's like the men in your community
the men the boys in your community hate
me but and and publicly a lot of women
from your side of the aisle hate me but
then in private it's like a different
story in private who if only you knew
it's like if only you knew in private
you know it's way different
but
i really don't even like you know i'm
not really interested but that's just
the truth from your side like the ones
you converse with and talk to about
politics on the internet right
those are the ones in my dms
and those are the ones
i i'm not gonna say anything i'm not
gonna say anything force vaccination in
the name of you know against healthy
individuals who are not at high risk
from diseases that don't threaten them
it's a violation of individuals they
don't find an uh violation of
individuals rights for the so-called
collective the greater good
uh it pushes the lives of they care
about individuals the communist unions
seek to persuade the angry so-called
workers to go up against and subvert the
the bosses who envisioned started build
and led the businesses that gave them
the jobs and the communism the
communists sometimes pretend to be
friends and want mutual benefit for
everyone and some of them sincerely feel
that way but in the end it's a phony
thing the best intentions are the road
to hell as you already know communists
don't mind lying stealing and killing to
get their way many others do too dennis
bragger said words and ideas are more
important for uh see you you have to
understand what infrared vision is
do you think what hake says
i don't care what he says when he says
this [Β __Β ] for vows this is the arena of
struggle now a is a i i don't give a
[Β __Β ] dude i i don't see i don't see it
that way when you i'm just saying he's
mouthing off about a bunch of
ideological [Β __Β ] and it's that's not
the meat and potatoes to me right
i don't know do you have to be like well
versed in psychoanalysis to know this
that the real meat and potatoes of what
people are saying is not premised on the
terms of rationality
um implied like if you're if you're if
your chain of reasoning is all
communists are bad people because
they're murderers right and then i break
this down to you and i go oh but we're
not murderers you're not actually
getting to the root cause of why they
said that
you guys ha
let me give this to you as a form of
relationship advice you guys want the
relationship advice because a lot of
times your girl is gonna say [Β __Β ] to you
complaining right
she's gonna be like
uh [Β __Β ] she's gonna be like oh you were
talking she's gonna be jealous or
something oh you were you were you uh
you're following someone or whatever on
instagram right
they're just going to say something
unreasonable and then you're going to
explain to them
rationally why they're wrong
you think they're going to be satisfied
do you think they're going to be
satisfied
you're going to rationally explain to
them why they are wrong
that's not going to satisfy them because
the source is deeper
it's deeper than what they're saying
it's always deeper you understand and
the same thing is true
in politics the reason why people
are have anti-communist views isn't
because they subscribe to
dogmas about the nature of communism
it's a much more fundamental
web of associations right and i don't
really think you have to be well versed
in psychoanalysis to understand that
but for a fat dumbass like vows he
thinks that stuff matters he thinks
that's what matters oh hack said
something against communism what is hans
gonna say haaz is not
going to worry about it because it's not
what matters right
i don't know
it's just really common sense
intellectual which is the same thing as
a communist or liberal as then actions
in reality so it's partly why the
straight talking nazis are much more
maligned than the sweet talking
communists which the mainstream media is
you know they have a hand or two
basically in america i think we have
what's called what i call common
capitalism because amazon google
facebook all these are embedded with the
government they support black lives like
he vosh can't help but
pay attention to what he's saying here
like deeply like what do you mean kami
capitalism why would you say that why
don't you try to actually entertain what
he means
but vosh doesn't actually know how to um
interpret meaning
in in
in an open sense like you could not put
valsha
in a
non-simulated environment he will not be
able to parse out the actual meaning of
what people try to convey
vos is a very limited sense of what
meaning is
right and it's very mechanical and i
don't know what that is or what what
that means
um where that pathology comes from but
that's just the type of person that
vouch is
for him
i'm not even saying this is like an
ideological prejudice maybe
he just was always like that right
because i've known a lot of people who
are like that
um but for them
meaning is
all meaning is wholly contained
on the explicit and conscious
terms of what meaning is right if i say
the meaning of a is a then a is a and
there's nothing deeper right if i say
for example uh
well communism is bad because
uh
it promotes the idea of absolute
equality right
that doesn't actually address what the
person is trying to say the more
fundamental like what is the web of
associations implied in that term in
real life it's like well they're
thinking of for example
all of their small homes being taken
away their car being taken away then
being reduced to the level of problem
you know you have to deal with
when you deal with the uh
objective web of associations right
you're dealing with a type of wilderness
of meaning that's not there's no ga
there's no like
already implied guarantee of meaning you
have so you have to do like work
mentally to just
try and feel out where they're coming
from that's something vajs cannot do
for him everything is just at the
surface level as far as language is
concerned there's nothing deeper
whatsoever
lives matter antifa just destruction of
the country they support the mass
immigration that's that's changing the
face of the country is like the ideas
the the surface level ideas of what he's
saying are so irrational illogical and
wrong but you haven't gotten to the root
source of why he's saying what he's
saying right at that level you have to
do things like a class analysis you have
to have a materialist analysis
and then how you talk to people like
this has to be informed and cognizant of
that
but vos doesn't understand that that
distinction that there's two levels to
this there's the one level where you
understand
in a materialist sense what this means
the second level being how do you
respond and how do you articulate this
in order to participate in that meaning
right he doesn't know how to do that
vos will crucify you
he will crucify you
on the cross
of definitions and explicit you know
propositional logic and anglo-box [Β __Β ]
but he actually won't get to the core to
the heart of where you're coming from
right
values of the country they support the
communist shutdowns in the name of the
virus that we have that has just
destroyed their competition or destroyed
the businesses and just meanwhile
they've made mass profits uh
that means more power for them as well
as for the government in america we're
already a socialist country you don't
own your own land or property you don't
have a right to contract for work with
workers to pay them just one or two
dollars an hour if they want to work
that you know be an usher or whatever
we've lost a lot of jobs in that way you
have wealth redistribution which is
really more like ghetto redistribution
through progressive attacks and social
programs and affirmative action all
these things you have the harsh hand of
lock lock coming down on innocence so
walsh hears this and he's terrified
those ideas are a contrast to my ideas
the way i work is i parse out what is he
trying to say what's the source of this
what what is meaningful here and what's
what's the meat and potatoes right
i don't know a lot of people just can't
operate on my level they just always
like
they just get allergic to when people
say things that are ideologically
opposed to them and they don't know how
to have the patience of saying like okay
but why do they want to die on this hill
it's all about what hill you want to die
on and why what is really the hill you
want to die on is the hill conservatives
want to die on dogmas about the things
that they're saying or is there
something more fundamental that can be
parsed out right
capital protesters because their
communism seeks to divide and conquer
the whites against the people of color
the people really really hear what's
going to say the blacks
and it's overwhelming the systems the um
in order to destroy them and rebuild
their image through immigration you see
the border is just being destroyed
you know i noticed dylan burns was a lot
more uh generous to me here and the
reason for that is because dylan burns
comes from a
conservative family i think right
but vosh is literally a beverly hills
lib
he comes from beverly hills from
hollywood family
so vash has no sympathy in his heart
whatsoever
for human beings that
are on the other side of the aisle as
him because he doesn't consider them
human right
to destroy and exploit the crisis and
then rebuild in their image the
government and the media or just filled
in my view with communists from joe
biden and common harris to to nikki
haley and even perhaps greg abbott over
in texas i don't see capitalism the
opposite of communism i see that really
as good versus evil so i see capitalism
as just as many communists do as a
stepping stone to communism because
when in capitalism it's like he's
laughing uh jokes on you vows what he's
saying
commands
authority to a lot of people right what
do you say it's like who's laughing you
know what
why is this fat ass [Β __Β ] laughing can
anyone explain why the fat [Β __Β ] is
laughing
who is really laughing in this scenario
the people winning right now
as evidenced by the most recent election
like in virginia etc where the
republicans are just
wiping the floor with the democrats and
conservatives are on the rise in this
country
republicans are there's going to be a
red wave in in the midterms like who's
really laughing you dumb fat [Β __Β ] for
all you're laughing
you're losing you dumb ass so maybe you
want to rethink how you're approaching
this you can laugh all you want vosh but
you're not going to be able to address
the root cause of why people find this
[Β __Β ] meaningful
right and people do find it meaningful
and that's why i call people like vaush
that's why i see the future of fascism
and people like this because the only
way the only way the fat [Β __Β ]
vows is gonna be able to cope
with this future
is by adopting an increasingly like
anti-democratic stance oh we gotta limit
voting rights we have to crack down on
people australia's style we need more
january 6
uh investigations and more crackdowns
and you know we have to use the military
and police power of the state to
suppress the people we have to get
behind big tax censorship like this is
where vasha's coming from because that's
his only last resort he is unable to
create any bridge
with the majority of working people in
this country whatsoever so he will have
to increasingly find and take refuge
behind the ruling class and the
repressive mechanisms of the state
that will be used against the people
do well hey that's funny that's also
what marx believed marx also thought
capitalism was a stepping stone to
communism that's oh wait hold on all
right
um
you are literally a dumbass vosh you're
actually a dumbass
marx thought so objectively
like in terms of the mode of production
but politically speaking no
capitalism does morph into socialism in
the form of monopolies and so on and so
on
but that doesn't mean the political
superstructure
is
going to adjust to that right doesn't
mean the political superstructure
becomes socialist
that's where the class struggle
gets waged right the class struggle gets
ways at the level of how society
is responding to this objective change
in the forces of production
do we have have we a dialectic
materialist in our you know actually
it's not true that marx dogmatic
dogmatically thought that
marx used several examples of countries
he believed did not have to pass through
a capitalist stage marx was not a
stageist
and we forget god you know the saying
goes tough times make strong make strong
man strong men make good oh my god good
times make mega weak mint and then weak
man make tough times oh my god wait hold
on i'm sorry so you guys know how
recently i talked about that joe rogan
i just want to know like where does
valsha's like aristocratic arrogant
posturing really come from
when you actually square it with the
political situation in this country what
is he like laughing and so arrogant
about
does anyone know like what
what what what is behind this fostering
politically speaking
politically speaking
vosh's
side of the aisle
isn't even dignified to be the comrade
of america
it's bad enough to just be a democrat
right now
but you're worse than a democrat you're
a bret tube leftist what [Β __Β ] future
do you have in this country
what future do you have in this [Β __Β ]
country i don't get where you this
posturing comes from like who are your
people where who's your tribe what what
future do you have
you're declining for a reason
in terms of your metrics
but in actually on the ground like what
is your political future right
you're an anarcho whatever
what
what future do you have
in this country
what are you laughing about what are you
so arrogant about i don't get it
instagram posts and i talked about julia
vola briefly that like mega nazi i
actually saw some people on twitter
maulding saying that like i hadn't read
his theory and he wasn't actually like
actually he's like not really a fascist
and so on
yeah because you didn't
and because i'm an idiot i thought for a
second oh goodness i hope i didn't get
anything wrong so i look down the thread
and then i look at all the people making
these claims and yeah he's a nazi he
literally worked with the ss they they
were like he didn't think women were
worse than men he thought that women
were different than men okay evola
politically yes he was aligned with the
nazis okay
but in terms of his traditionalist
body of thinking
which i disagree with by the way
although i'm not allergic to it i would
i would be willing to admit that i'm i
agree with him if i did i just don't
right it's the same with like a lot of
others but in terms of his body of work
you can't reduce that to fascism
it's not like he was
the ideologist of nazism
and the the the crucial reason for that
is is that nazism is inherently
um tied to eugenics it's inherently tied
to biological racialism right
without that you don't have you don't
really don't have uh nazism in a
in any meaningful sense of the word
ebola represented the decaying
aristocracies
of europe specifically the ones that
were pretty much on their way to being
wiped out after world war one
different in that they can't vote or
participate in civic society outside of
childbearing but they're not worse
they're just you know like he he wasn't
a fascist when he was at that trial and
he called himself a super fascist that
was like a meme dude he what he was
saying was he was so fascist that he was
more fascist than the fashion no what he
was saying was that
he is so he is
he was being provocative because the the
people in the trial right
he considered them to be modern and
modernist enemies or whatever right
so he was like okay if you associate
fascism as your boogie man i'm even
worse than that right
i mean yes
it's not un
reasonable to associate evolo with
fascism i'm just saying
calling him a nazi
as if that's like the significance of
ebola
as far as like these schools of thought
is concerned now it doesn't work right
it's like
for example evola was not as far as i
remember he wasn't big on the
anti-semitism right
and i think that's a that's a you know
that's that's a detail that needs
consideration
he never said he was a supervisor i'm
just assuming boss is being factually
correct maybe he's a lying [Β __Β ] and he's
wrong
right
but
yeah i wouldn't really say
just the court uh prosecutor knew about
but that's not him being fascist like
like it was [Β __Β ] like that then i looked
and i saw like great brother accounts
and shows like okay i don't know why
even bothered reading through this [Β __Β ]
you know
evolve was wild man oh my god but you
didn't just say like oh he was
associated with the nazis and he had
involvement with fascists you went as
far as to say like that
he is more he's like
he's like more nazi than hitler or
whatever like you you said a lot of
stupid [Β __Β ] about ebola that people
called you out on because you were
[Β __Β ] wrong
right
you were like you're like oh this guy is
so
fascist and so right-wing it would make
hit hitler
blush and it's like no dude i mean
historically we associate hitler with
things like
his views on racial superiority the
holocaust
le ben's rom and you know
things the wars of aggression it's not
really
it that's not really the side of ebola
right that's not really what's up
evola's alley right as much as ebola may
have been sympathetic to the nazis and
the fascists because he viewed them as
the incarnation of you know some kind of
modern reaction
you can't have this simplistic analysis
you may as well not but
it's besides the point you shouldn't
even mention ebola that's the thing
there's no reason to mention him in the
context that you did
with with [Β __Β ] um
with joe rogan's [Β __Β ] instagram
picture that had nothing to do with
evolo
and moreover
the idea that evola is known for the
hard men create strong time whatever
like hard times great strongmen no dude
if like i said if anything it's the kali
yuga stuff that's associated with ebola
maybe you can you can make a case for
that
not this the [Β __Β ] meme about you know
hard times make strong man that's just
not
you don't need to be like an
intellectual to to think that's
true you know it's just like a meme
and that's when the communists like to
strike not every meme
not every simple meme has profound
intellectual origins sometimes the
profundity of a meme reflects the way it
makes sense of reality
it not everything has like a secret
origin that's in fact that's how a lot
of paranoid right-wingers think they
think everything has to have like a a
secret origin think about all the talk
of critical race theory and like
cultural marxism and stuff like do you
really have to like have this like you
know archival
uh eldridge
you know occult knowledge of cultural
marxism to be a blue hair
[Β __Β ] you know
sjw you don't right
you're reading too much into it
that's what vows does too though that's
also what vaj does but for the right
wing just in the same way right-wingers
read into [Β __Β ] and they think oh this is
because of the nefarious influence of
cultural marxism or the post or foucault
and post-modernism not everything has
intellectual origins right that's
idealism that's the [Β __Β ] crux of
idealism it's just this idea that
everything's origins have to be in some
kind of like
explicitly rendered idea from an
intellectual
so capitalism is supposed to be about
freedom but you can't have freedom i
think john adams said without morality
so freedom from is supposed to be
freedom from this degeneracy but they
push pornography and all that madness to
just subvert families
one douchebag is ready to debate
what does he want to debate about
and what's his name
what's his name
jax
okay give me a moment
okay we're gonna debate him right now
what do you want dumbass
yeah you're a little [Β __Β ]
what's your criticism
we're saying that jimmy
not mistaken i didn't say he was a
communist
you didn't
no
i i thought you told uh
you told hake that he
he was the the prototypical
what was it communist here in the u.s
yeah i said he's more similar to
communists in other countries in the us
if you want to find an example of people
in the u.s that represent what other
communists in other countries represent
jimmy dore is a good example of that
jimmy dore is a good example okay so
jimmy dore seems to be
uh going further and further to the
right
oh he's going further and further to the
right
so tell me what is this political
spectrum these are the type these are
the level arguments oh so so hold on
hold on
so wait wait wait no no we're gonna
parse that out hey shut your [Β __Β ] ass
up let's parse it off shut your [Β __Β ]
ass up so let's pass this out so he's
going further to the right what does
that mean objectively
his ideology is
moving away from what so what is the
right wing and what is the left wing
define those for me
define left and right wing yeah define
it
okay i'll just in simple terms i'll say
that
uh left wing is egalitarianism a
progressive ideals um okay attempting to
give more more freedoms and liberties to
people oh really and then hold on the
right wing would be
uh-huh go ahead more freedoms and
liberties is the left
so is the vaccine mandates does that
make people more free and have more
liberty than otherwise
overall yes
how is that
same thing with uh how your seat belt
laws overall protect society but on the
individual level restrict your
movement inside of your car i guess
that's what so what if whatever
right-wing fascist would say that
given the uh what in the long run and in
the bigger picture we actually give
people more freedom and liberty we just
attac we just repress people and we're
very authoritarian and we're strict
because it's in their best interests
how is that different
i'm sorry i didn't catch what you're
basically saying the vaccine mandates
are giving people more freedom and
liberty because ultimately they're in
the best interests of people right
yeah
well what if
you come from a right-wing fascist
perspective and you say the same thing
well my authoritarianism that wants to
supposedly clamp down on freedoms and
liberties actually what i'm doing is in
the best interests of people and
therefore maximizes their freedoms
within the range of their objective
potentials
right that's perfectly fine and that way
so it's it's later on it's fine
it's fine hold on point
it's fine
hold on hold on shut the [Β __Β ] up shut
the [Β __Β ] up shut the [Β __Β ] up i just got
you i just got you saying something you
just said it's fine to consider a
right-wing fascist as a leftist isn't
that a bit paradoxical i did not do that
no
but you just said you said
let me let me get this straight you said
jimmy doors moving to the right and then
i asked you what define the right and to
find the left and you told me that the
left is defined
by more
freedoms and more liberties right
right and then you stop me from defining
the right
but hold on but jimmy dore is advocating
for more freedoms and liberties
specifically on the issues that you
accuse him of being a right winger in
regards to jimmy dore is more of
pro-free speech he's against the vaccine
mandates he's against all of these
lockdowns and authoritarian crackdowns
committed by the government so how can
you say he's moving toward the right
when by your own definition he's moving
more toward the left you see the issue
no
i i you're making you're construing
you're misconstruing what i'm saying or
trying to make the point being that
because he's against lockdowns which
ultimately or vaccine mandates with
which ultimately hurt
the population he is giving he is the he
is in the pos he has the position that
we have more liberties that is incorrect
if you are
less if you are if you are doing things
that first of all in my opinion he's
doing it because he's grifting but if
he's doing things that are going to harm
the overall population then since he's
doing that he is infringing on the
liberties of the population
so okay
how does a population hold on you're not
talking about the liberties and freedom
of the population as agents you're
treating them as a bunch of flock of
sheep that you know what's going on
is right that's what stop signs and and
traffic laws are but stop signs and
traffic stop signs and traffic laws are
in place on the basis of a mandate of
from the people that's that's treating
people like sheep no it's not about the
people themselves consent to those
things the people right now are not
consenting to the vaccine mandates and
lockdowns
they are not acting in their sovereign
capacity in a way that approves of those
things quite on the contrary you as an
individual don't matter you are in a
democracy okay you're not you're in a
representative democracy and this
representative democracy you vote for
your representatives and they do the
laws for you okay
yeah but no one absolutely is that why
the constituencies of these democrats in
places like new york are overwhelmingly
coming out in protest against vaccine
mandates
i don't know if they are or not i mean
you don't know what they are because
you're not informed obviously they are
looking at i'm looking at australia
recently i haven't been looking at new
york but the thing is i can tell you
that if we had
the the type of people that would have
implemented the right or would have
taken the right decisions at the
beginning of this we would have what
maybe twenty thousand ten thousand
people dead instead of the seven hundred
thousand dollars listen that's not the
point i don't care about your reasoning
i care about how you define the right
and the left
the liberties and freedom of all those
people is gone all those people are gone
those people could be alive hold on but
nowhere nowhere is it implied
hold on so you're saying liberty is what
maximally guarantees the
the ability for people to live right so
a government can take
the government can take therefore any
actions against its population against
the will of its population if it's going
to help preserve the lives of the most
people
ideally yes so and that's that's that's
freedom and liberty to you right
i mean
in in the very myopic uh understanding
of this conversation if you're going to
put it in that context very simply put
yes
governments should ensure the safety and
protection of all its people even
forcefully
even forcefully right
even even forcefully yeah that would be
a dictatorship that would be
authoritarianism but hold on
so what so what you just said if if it
leads to more people living in the long
run
then it is actually more pro freedom and
more liberty right i told you i told you
if you want to put it in this context
very simply put instead it's not it's
not for you to make an argument out of
it i am not in favor of it have you are
you a fan of george orwell's 1984
because he said war is peace freedom of
slavery ignorance is strength it sounds
like you're saying freedom is
dictatorship i want a democracy is
dictatorship
freedom is authoritarianism
right
um liberty is repression is that what
you're saying how is how is liberty
repression well because you're saying if
we operate by the standard that vaccine
mandates which forcefully impose the
vaccines on the population regardless of
their will
since that leads to more people being
able to live in the long run
that this ultimately leads to more
freedom and liberty because who has
freedom and liberty when they're not
alive right
okay so
literally right now school system has
mandate essentially what is mandated
vaccines
for children
yes guess what guess what you live and
you don't you have liberty are you
suggesting that we should hold the adult
citizens of this country to the same
standard as miners
it's it's not surprising from a welsh
fan
it's absolutely unsurprising that a
welsh fan would hold adult citizens to
the standard of minors because vash does
the same thing when it comes to
sexuality right but you're it's it's
arguments
don't go beyond what you're doing right
now you know very well what you're doing
right now that's called a strawman and
it's a it's a shitty argument but if
that's a straw man we're talking about
if we can go back because you're
assuming that i'm definitely but you
just used you just used the school
system as an example and a model to
impose on the population at large first
of all you make the decision for your
children so it is a matter of adults
making decisions so we are children the
what no you're not children it's the
decision making that is involved here
that is what is important you're used to
that
you're using an example of adults making
decisions for children
uh to be applied to adults making
decisions for your adults
assault for yourself you make your
decision for yourself and you make the
decision for your okay well guess what
that's not what's on the table here
right what's on the table here is the
vaccine mandates which are forcing or
coercing the population into taking
vaccines
the
traffic light is not coercing you to
stop hold on
wait
you're saying a traffic light is the
same as a vaccine mandate
yes regulating traffic is the same as a
vaccine mandate
it's a law that is there to protect you
it says then why isn't there any why
isn't there widespread resistance
against traffic laws
there are idiots that when we started
passing the the seat belts were against
seat belts was it remotely comparable as
a phenomena in scale and severity and
intensity to the resistance against the
mandates
against the vaccine mandate yeah
i mean i don't know why that would be uh
i guess not because there's more
uh there's
first of all there's the internet now so
there's more information just [Β __Β ]
being shot out everywhere most of it is
so so we need what you're saying is we
need more censorship then right
what no
do you think we should censor this
misinformation how did you pick that up
bro hold on well i'm just asking i don't
i don't know what your position is
do you think this do you think this
misinformation should then be censored
no i i want freedom of speech i don't
want to censor anybody okay
okay so going back to a normal argument
here so hold on what is hold on wait
what is an example of
right wingers wanting to restrict
people's freedom and liberties
what is an example yeah
well we were in another topic okay what
the [Β __Β ] is going on uh
something that the right-wingers are
doing to restrict people okay yeah gay
people from getting
married against that they were against
that in the last 20 20 years that
doesn't actually restrict hold on but
that doesn't restrict anyone's freedom
what the [Β __Β ] are you talking about of
course it does it there it doesn't it
doesn't prohibit people from
listening it doesn't it doesn't prohibit
people from engaging in any kind of
behavior it prohibits the state from
recognizing that form of risk
and that makes him an underclass
that makes him a different type of
citizen okay but that you still haven't
made the argument about restricting
people's range of choices and freedom
and liberty
okay but this let me okay so do you
understand how like laws and regulations
work look alabama until recently i think
alabama is one of the last ones until
recently
uh made
interracial marriage illegal this is
it's in the same vein as to what is
happening now sure nobody was going to
uh
maybe maybe nobody was going to what if
what if the right wingers in alabama
what if those what if the jim crow
people segregationists in alabama made a
similar argument as you and they said
well we're restricting uh interracial
marriage but this is ultimately because
uh it's for the common good and this is
ultimately because it's in the people's
best interests and we're actually
maximizing their liberty and freedom by
taking this action well you would get so
here's the thing right as i was saying
before if you're going to take what i
said and use it in the most simple
context okay
i'm just letting you know the context is
i want a democracy so in a democrat you
don't want a democracy i want a
democracy if you wanted a democracy the
majority of the people to be okay with
the decision of their leaders and in
that case i would be okay with them
restricting hold
you know what democracy means rule by
the people right
yeah so it so if the majority of people
are against the vaccine mandates and
you're saying that the mandate should be
imposed upon them anyway isn't that kind
of anti-democratic
no i want the majority to be if the
majority want to have i think the
polling shows that the majority of the
people want
to have they don't
no no
okay i haven't i haven't actually been
following any polls like that but i
would imagine that if that is the case
where they are against that i'm okay
with it not being passed because of that
i am in favor of it okay so that's jimmy
dore's position
jimmy dore's position is not that jimmy
dore is becoming a right-wing grifter
what the [Β __Β ] are you give an example of
how he's becoming a right-wing grifter
okay he's anti-vaxx
is he anti-vaxx
i mean he is anti-this vaccine in the
sense of he is questioning things that
have no merit he is uh referencing
articles uh selectively choosing
paragraphs selectively choosing parts of
the of the
of the articles he reads to make a
picture that entices or uh plays to the
interest of a right-wing audience that
is anti-vaxxer okay so you just said a
bunch of words salad is jimmy dora
vaccinated he's explained into
anti-vaccine
is he is he himself vaccinated
he is playing into anti-vaccine is he
himself vaccinated
uh sure yes
does his audience know he's vaccinated
uh i think so yes does he tell people
that they should take the vaccine
um i'm not entirely sure you're not sure
don't really no no like i literally
don't want but you but you just used th
you just called him an anti-vaxxer so
surely someone who's an anti-vaxxer
would never tell their audience to take
the vaccine under any circumstances he's
right
he's playing into the anti-vaccine
rhetoric
too too coddled to a specific type of uh
demographic or not maybe he's trying to
say that there's some merit in people
demanding the rights
that's the problem that there is no
merit he's just
so we should accept what the
pharmaceutical companies say at face
value we're not allowed to criticize or
scrutinize anything that our private
pharmaceutical companies say right
no absolutely you should question it
but isn't that pandering to the right
wing if you question it
uh if you question
uh if
are you are you anti-capitalists like
what the [Β __Β ] is going on here i don't i
don't know are you anti-capitals because
you seem to be holding water so severely
for private pharmaceutical companies so
much that we can't even question
100 i want to tax them i want to text
the [Β __Β ] out of them and i want them to
be super regulated and for us to have
you know
a say on our prices for for drugs but
that doesn't mean that the scientists
there who made the [Β __Β ] vaccine are
[Β __Β ] a cabal trying to [Β __Β ] with us
uh with a controller somehow with the
vaccine what the [Β __Β ] are you surprised
before we get into speculating for the
reasonings behind the them producing the
vaccines do we or do we not have the
right to scrutinize these companies
and the also these scientists for
releasing this rapidly new form of
vaccine technology the mrna technology
don't we at least have the right to
question this
uh you have the right to
get informed
uh but isn't that pandering to the right
wing according to you
to get informed yeah so let me ask you a
question
do do you think that there is no merit
to right wing sentiment at all
of any capacity there's no merit to it
what it what is the right-wing sentiment
i don't know 50 of the country do you
think that these people are all just
what is the sentiment what is this
sentiment is that you're the one talking
about right you're the the one that
jimmy dore is supposedly pandering to
the anti-vaccine rhetoric
in addition to everything else you have
in mind as far as jimmy dore is
concerned what the [Β __Β ] are you saying
what is the specific thing that you're
saying that they're they're warranted to
have in their minds
i didn't say anything yet i'm asking you
okay so you want me to put something in
there in their minds and then talk about
it i'm asking you you said you said
jimmy dore is pandering to right-wing
sentiment yes or no yes so you you want
me to specifically talk about is there
any merit to that widely held sentiment
or is it all just a result of the
anti-vaccine it is uh
unfounded yeah so so ever so 50 of
people who just aren't as smart as you
are
the 50 i don't know that's 50
how many people voted for trump
uh i don't know
how much of the electorate voted for
trump in the 2020 election
i don't know
whatever it is why don't you look it up
what what is it can you it's around it's
around 50 it's it's around 50
okay sure
so you're saying that you're saying that
totality of the people that voted for
trump are anti-vaxxer
yeah the grand majority are
so you are making that argument not me
i'm supposing i will suppose that it's
not the majority of the pop
oh so so you think only a minority of
people are right wing in america
i think a minority of yes there's a
minority okay what percentage of the
population in america do you figure is
right wing
i don't know
what what is at 35 what is this part of
what discussion is this so let's let's
just entertain the idea that it's 35
percent the silly idea 35 right wing and
again before you keep going with
anything let's let's entertain the silly
idea that it's pretty much
let's entertain the silly idea that it's
a mere 35 percent hell let's even
entertain a silly idea it's 25
right
is it better for your math is jimmy dora
wrong
to try and build a bridge to reach out
to these people and not assume that they
hold the views that they do because
they're stupid and evil but maybe
because they're normal human beings that
can they can find common ground with on
the basis of an anti-establishment
politics
why should they be written off
okay so
have you had have you made any success
reaching out to these people
here's my question i i answer my
question have you made any success
reaching out to them
do right wingers yeah
uh like like normie right wingers yeah
oh you have
normie right wingers yes you have and in
what way
i've tried to uh
explain to them how racism has permeated
all our institutions in the us
um
mainly co-workers that are not too far
gone
um and trying to make them see how
different like how racism still what do
you work what's your job
uh i don't want to talk about it well
give us a vague idea what kind of class
do you like i am
i am uh i would say
i'm technically blue collar
your blue collar
yeah
but i make good money like an
electrician okay like an electrician and
you convince your fellow electricians to
be lefties now
no but i i explained to them that racism
does and they agree with you
i managed to convince a few yeah what
did you convince them of
that racism
institutionalized racism exists
uh that certain people
so did you convince them to change their
vote from trump to something else
uh i don't know that i did that now you
didn't and by the way well i mean i
imagine by the way let me give you an
idea of what i mean let me tell you what
those people think of it
yeah i'm gonna give you an idea of what
those people think of you they think
you're the narc the cctv camera and
they're not honest with you behind your
back they're relieved every time you're
gone they think you're an annoying [Β __Β ]
and they can't wait to get away from you
true or false
um i don't know i think they like me i'm
my boss for a couple of them so you're
the boss even better so you think how
they act around you the boss is what
reflects what they really think
so the way that my work works is that
i'm
i and there's a very jovial and very um
it's not as you're a good boss
right no no no like like just the work
the workplace where i'm at is not a
strict regimentation yeah yeah you're a
good boss the good one no i'm not i'm
not a good boss i i just don't want to
tell you exactly what i do but i'm not
in a position where i'm i'm just in
charge of like certain enemies you're
the manager you're the manager
kind of like that the manager and they
love you they they're totally honest
with you they never talk [Β __Β ] behind
your back and make fun of you oh no for
sure they they do but i imagine there's
people that can make the arguments i
make and still be liked i don't know why
but they they do like you right they
they they totally every time you talk to
them about race politics and stuff
they're totally other people when
they're not in their heads when they're
nodding their heads in front of you
they're being totally honest listen
listen yeah there's other people there
that are
left-wing too there's black people that
work with me
why do you think black people are uh
left-wing inherently
no i'm saying there are black people
that hear me talk about how racism still
exists and they're like oh
okay
well i don't i don't really think the
idea
is hold on i don't really think the idea
that racism still exists is all that
controversial even among right-wingers
right-wingers
right-wingers will say that it's on the
individual level and that institutional
areas not all a lot of them can accept
that there is still racism in this
country but i the ones that i've seen
that are problematic are saying what i'm
telling you they're saying so you think
it's that you so you wear as a badge of
honor your ability as a manager to
convince people that racism exists
i mean i i've been in this um
in this workplace right now okay i
haven't always had speaking of race
i haven't always had the position of a
manager yeah you've gotten it now
because you're a [Β __Β ] narc so
speaking of race
um
you would you would say you've made it
you've made an interesting association
you've made an interesting association
so you said that
being pro-vaccine
is left-wing because it maximizes
freedom you were talking about jimmy
dore have you ever heard hold on shut
the [Β __Β ] up we're no no we're going down
this road being pro-vaccine is left and
you change you change topics
hey shut up shut up pro vaccine is
left-wing anti-vaxxer's right-wing yes
right now he's civilized here yes or no
i'm asking you yes or no you're not
gonna pivot when you're not going to
pivot when i have you corners so answer
my [Β __Β ] question
is left-wing anti-vaxxer's right-wing
right
these nazis or right-wingers okay that's
what i'm i'm talking to you about
we are not going to go anywhere until
you answer this question provax is
left-wing anti-vaxx is right-wing yes or
no
listen here goofball
you minimally you said it you okay i'm
just gonna go ahead and say yes you did
say that you're gonna assume whatever
you want you did say that you did
[Β __Β ] say that so and you also said
you also said in your own words
you also said in your own words that
recognizing race and and you associated
black people with left wing
and people who don't recognize the issue
of race with right wing yes or no
yes you did
you won't admit it because you're a
[Β __Β ] coward but we can
[Music]
little
you sound like a mouse [Β __Β ] no one can
[Β __Β ] hear you when you try to talk
over me so don't even [Β __Β ] try it
you're a [Β __Β ] now you have to answer
this question you [Β __Β ] knock dicky
you [Β __Β ] man is your [Β __Β ] now you
have to answer this that's
worth it that racial minorities are the
most resistant to nazis
i can't hear you
why are black and latino people the most
resistant to vaccines
okay
i i are you calm down
you just got [Β __Β ] i literally just
[Β __Β ] your skull you just got [Β __Β ]
you may be having an aneurysm
you just used black people as an example
of the left wing you just said jimmy
dore's the right winger because he's
anti-vaxx
a black black population is the most
resistant to hitting the vaccines
you are so infantile listen
first off i will talk about this topic
no problem i wanted to just
[Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] and it took you so long beating
around the bush dancing around the
[Β __Β ] topic only to get [Β __Β ] anyway
that's you devoid of arguments brother
let me see i'm devoid of arguments
is that why you tried to weasel your way
out of this is that why you tried so
hard to claw your way out of this
argument
anything
jimmy dore
contact or trying to appeal to right
wingers okay you were you were trying to
say hey
jimmy dore is appealing to right-wingers
let me explain something to you okay do
you know who martin nemolaire is no
okay
first they came for the communists pivot
based pivot and you remember that you
remember that what are you gonna say
first they came from the soy gyno nerd
[Β __Β ] like you first they came from
the managers then they came for the
bosses then they came for blackrock then
they came for jeff bezos i don't give a
[Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
what i do but listen
here's the thing first they came for the
narcs first they came to the managers
then they came for the netflix employees
grifter he is a grifter he's a grifter
what does a grifter mean
he changes his mind for whoever pays him
the most okay ross doesn't do that ron
does voss do that
for whoever pays him the most i don't
think so does boss change his mind
opportunistically based on what the
audience wants
hold on i can change my mind and you can
change your mind okay explain how
explain how jimmy dore changes his mind
based on money i am telling you that he
uh several videos before his new
anti-vax arc he was talking about you
should get the vaccine it's important
that you get the vaccine and he still
says
hold on but he still says that
no he he's changed his rhetoric man i'm
telling you he's appealing to a [Β __Β ]
right-wing anti-vaxx audience
okay that's all i had to say about wait
wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait
so that's what makes him right wing he's
appealing to a right-wing anti-vaxx
audience because he's he's skeptical of
the big pharma
right no no and it's not because of that
it's because he's just trying to
cultivate an audience and he's why are
you racist though why are you a racist
ku klux klan loving democrat you're a
racist right
what do you mean
well because the black population is the
most resistant to getting the vaccine so
surely those are a bunch of right
wingers so you're positioning yourself
against them aren't you i'm saying
anti-vaxx
first of all the problem is not
being black the problem is being
anti-vaxxed and i don't care
but but the black population is the most
resistant specifically in new york
getting the best version by taking your
face value taking you at face value and
saying that is black people right
uh but it's oh you want to disprove it
it's objectively true they are resistant
to the vaccine not even looking up i
have a computer right in front of me i
could i'm telling you i'm taking you at
face value i'm going to assume that
black people don't are now vaccinating
themselves i know it's not just that
they're not vaccinated they're the most
resistant
the most resistant to getting the
vaccine they have the least amount of
trust in the vaccine out of anyone
let's
are you pretending like the there's no
history of why that would be
why would it be go ahead is your
argument what is your argument enlighten
us why would it be
they they have been betrayed by by the
government multiple times
yeah including medically so doesn't that
make them right-wing
does not make them right-wing why
they're they're against freedom and
liberty they're against the government
doing what's in their best interests of
freedom and liberty so it makes them
right-wing right
i am i'm not calling black people right
wing how how of course you don't want to
but logically speaking you would have to
based on what you said before [Β __Β ] are
you saying no
first of all you just said people who
don't who are resistant to the vaccines
are right-wing sweetie let me explain to
you this yeah call me one more time
okay you want to do that how about i
meet you about jazz what happens when
i'm youtube what happens when you're
muted what happens when you're muted i
want you to know something facts for as
long as you're here you're my [Β __Β ] you
are personally my [Β __Β ] i already [Β __Β ]
your skull and absolutely [Β __Β ]
annihilated you beyond the threshold of
recovery already that already [Β __Β ]
happened now we're just having some
[Β __Β ] fun you wanna [Β __Β ] with me dax
and play with me
you're not gonna and it's not gonna turn
out well for you it's not gonna turn out
well for you and by the way this is an
act of dominance my fingers are in your
mouth right now
for lack of being able to say the the
other thing your mouth is gagged you are
gagged right now your throat is gagged
you cannot speak
no one can hear you are gagged you are a
[Β __Β ] you are my [Β __Β ] specifically you
need to know where you're at dax because
they are
way
way far from your home this ain't reddit
dax you're not in reddit anymore
you're not in reddit anymore little boy
you [Β __Β ] narc [Β __Β ]
are you done [Β __Β ] boy
would you call me
[Β __Β ] boy okay you need you need another
gag in your mouth right
i don't know i don't understand i've
been trying to talk you need another gag
in your mouth don't you don't you can't
haunt me if you don't say one if you
don't say another word you are my [Β __Β ]
you have 10 seconds to speak or you can
see to me that you're my [Β __Β ]
10
9
8
7
6
five
four
three
two
one
zero
my [Β __Β ]
that's exactly what you [Β __Β ] are
don't ever forget it dax
don't ever forget it
like with your uh
display of dominance
yeah sigma male dominance over here who
do you think's the more dominant male me
or you
well you seem to be unable to cope with
somebody tearing apart your [Β __Β ] for
it how have you done that how have you
done that
i mean
you keep
jumping
[Β __Β ] this isn't your workplace you have
no power here you are [Β __Β ] hey listen i
told you i wasn't assuming that the
entirety of the right wing was anti-vaxx
that was you and you can but you made
the association between anti-vaxx and
right-wing
i didn't make any
i said that the right wing
which is probably the majority of the
anti-vaxxers that is so let's let's walk
it through how is jimmy do our right
wing
i said jimmy dore was a grifter and how
was the right wing you called him right
wing too didn't you i did not i said he
didn't he didn't call him right wing so
he has nothing to do with being right
wing now right
i said he's pandering to a right-wing
audience
i just explained to you he has literally
gone to a full arc of anti-vaccine
vaccinations she just said okay the most
resistant population to the the vaccine
are black people
so you see how we got to this circle now
didn't you so so let me let me
understand you see how we got to this
circle calm down come down i understand
where you came i understand i understand
i understand
13 of the population okay is black okay
let's assume well let's be you know uh
charitable and say that half and half so
about six point five percent of it right
seven percent is uh right wing and seven
percent is left wing okay
his audience obviously is not going to
be just black people and the majority of
the that's not what i said i said the
population that is most resistant to the
vaccines is the black population and
those are all but can you can you at
least concede that those are all right
wingers the audience
the majority of the audience that he
would be pandering to would be white
why well yeah because the white people
are the majority of this country but
exactly as a proportion of people
resistant to the vaccine
it's disproportionately
about what he doesn't care about his
proportions on his [Β __Β ]
oh is that you is that too big of a word
for you you dumb [Β __Β ]
what do you mean you just are pretending
like the proportion is what matters not
the numbers and the number is what
matters
the number does matter you are targeting
and smearing and attacking the black
community no i am specifically yes you
are well the black community is
overwhelmingly resist more resistant to
the vaccine than any other community in
new york okay listen you're saying what
is the number is the number so like
asinine that's like 94. you don't [Β __Β ] i
don't know vos didn't teach you logic or
something or how this works
even if there were only five black
people in this country and three of them
were resistant to the vaccines you are
targeting black people by calling
everyone who's resistant to the vaccines
or right winger or you're at least
saying those three people are
right-wingers so you're saying the
majority of black people are right
wingers you know basic logic it doesn't
matter how many there are it doesn't
matter how many there are it's about who
you're targeting
let's do some math the majority of the
country is white
what is your point i'm talking about
your stance toward black people listen
the majority of the people in this
country is so what so majority the
majority of right wingers slash
republicans you don't have to mix them
quite
like you don't have to perfectly match
them together but they would
most likely intersect in their interests
so the majority of in the of this
country is white the majority of the
right-wing population is white and the
majority of the right-wing population is
anti-vax okay okay
if you are changing your
positions
to pander to a specific group of people
which i would tell you
is the majority anti-vaxx and that of
that majority the majority is uh i'm
sorry of that group anti-vaxx the
majority is going to be white
i am not talking about the black people
and and like taking this whole thing or
you're not you're not but you are
because you just defined but you defined
the premise of jimmy dore being a
right-winger
you have to prove the premise you stupid
[Β __Β ] so shut your bitch-ass [Β __Β ]
mouth and listen here you just defined
jimmy dore being a right-winger on the
basis of being anti-vaxxed how do you
know that he's only targeting
right-wingers who are anti-vaccines how
do you know that
i'm saying he's pandering to a
right-wing how do you know how do you
know
because the majority of the right-wing
audience
is where the majority of the
anti-vaxxers exist
what does that have to do with anything
the black population in new york is the
most resistant to the vaccine you keep
saying that but proportionally it's
going to be a minority of his po of
okay but what does it say about the so
the is the black population right wing
or not right wing in your view
is the black population because i asked
you to define what right wing means and
you defined it in terms of anti-vaxx so
if you're defining right wing in terms
of anti-back then let me define it you
jumped ah
as soon as i define it define it define
it i would say right wing is a
um basically attempting to control
the
restrictions that government puts in all
of us all of us on the on the merit of
individual liberties pretending like uh
there's a meritocracy in place or
attempting to
um establish a
system of freedom that is based on how
much you have or or what what you are as
a person can you get the dick out of
your mouth so you could stop quavering
and [Β __Β ] trembling and [Β __Β ] fear
the word is quivering yeah um i am not
so you basically just said nothing you
basically just said nothing you
basically just [Β __Β ] said nothing you
basically just said the right wing
the right wing the right wing means
everyone who's for individual liberty
and believes in meritocracy
uh yeah it's basically meritocracy and
uh a cell like i would say it's
anti-egalitarian more patriarchal type
of ideals where yeah uh a strong figure
controls
government or or preferably who who
controls the government right now
a weak figure
uh
i mean i don't know you're jumping from
topic to topic
is the right wing in power in the
government right now
uh yes
oh they are
the right wing of this country is not
but the right wing
uh the the government that is in place
is fairly right-wing oh so biden's a
right-winger to you
yes okay good i'm glad we we can
establish that
yeah so byron's the right one to me he
is right-wing so why why is it that
jimmy dore is constantly attacking biden
a right-winger he doesn't want to upset
the right-wing audience right wouldn't
most if biden's a right-winger doesn't
it follow that biden supporters are also
right-wingers but biden supporters hate
jimmy dore so how does that how does
that uh
figure
so
you can slowly
um
bring or shift your views
uh and still he he
criticizes joe biden right
right wingers criticized joe biden
but i thought joe biden's a right winger
right right right um see i'm sorry i
mean right-wingers in this country which
are bordering fascists
oh they're bordering fascists yes are
well the the the
group you should be concerned about so
jimmy dore is also doing that too right
jimmy dore is a fascist no i didn't say
that i also didn't say he was right-wing
either i said he's catering to a
right-wing audience a right-winger
because because he's skeptical of of
that of the big pharmaceutical companies
that manufacture the guys that's not the
problem brother the problem is he's
grifting he's changing his views he's
clearly
how has he changed his views because i'm
telling you he had videos recently where
he's like how has he changed his views
he was first criticizing people not
wanting to get the vaccine and now he's
gone full but he said that he wasn't
informed back then and he became more
educated and informed and he realized
there was a lot of holes in the things
that according to him he doesn't do
anything to you what's that the vaccine
doesn't do anything to you well you can
go debate him about that
no but you're the one that said he's a
communist when he's got literally he's
pissed
you said he's a communist quote me
what's the exact quote what did i say
you said what would be the equivalent of
a communist in the u.s
so i said he asked you jimmy dore is
more comparable to what in the u for
being in the u.s what communists are in
eastern europe and elsewhere does that
mean he is necessarily himself a
communist or that he's more compe he's
more like them and he's more comparable
to them he's not a communist he's not
even close to a communist he's an idiot
he's a grifter you're not a communist
you're a [Β __Β ] gnar if you little
[Β __Β ] you're a lip [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] artist
either wearing a pink tutu in your
[Β __Β ] workplace and everyone [Β __Β ]
hates you there was a disgusting narc
[Β __Β ] to wear the pig tutu okay it's my
channel yeah everyone sees you as a lib
[Β __Β ] snowflake in your workplace and
they all try to avoid you like the
plague okay i mean that those aren't
arguments but you know it's true
no yeah it is true no no it's a shitty
argument no it's completely correct it's
completely you are a [Β __Β ] narc listen
to the core you're a narcissist listen
stop yelling jesus manager manager dax
i'm not i didn't say jimmy is not a
communist when did i call him a
communist a confidence to someone who
calls themselves a communist with a
capital c
you think
what is the communist thing about what's
a communist what you're talking about
what's a communist a communist you want
me to give you the definition of
communism yeah okay
i will tell you simply put a communist
attempts to equally distribute the
wealth of the
whatever the community
is that fair is that enough what
authority do you derive that definition
what
by what on what authority do you derive
that definition where does it come from
well i mean from like the
theory from marxist theory recited form
cite the theory for me that justifies
this description of what communism is
what what do you mean why do i have to
give you like what is this because i'm
saying you're full of [Β __Β ]
because because i i am insane because
what i'm saying is that it doesn't exist
the theory doesn't exist to justify that
description of communism prove me wrong
psychic theories of what i'm saying what
is communism then
wait now you're asking me
i'm telling you that in a in an ideal
communist system you would distribute
the wealth equally and you would ensure
that everybody has a a minimum set um
of uh
[Music]
hold up
uh has a minimum set of standards by the
way which they live in so
where are you getting this from on what
authority do you say this
well i know that uh
there are
first of all this is an example of like
what the black panthers were doing how
they were ensuring is that what they
said can you please cite me where the
black panther said that
i didn't say the black panther said that
i said it so who said it where did you
get the where did on what authority do
you derive this description of congress
are you trying to make an argument about
something or are you trying to do i'm
calling you i'm calling you a stupid
[Β __Β ] who doesn't know what they're doing
you caught me a stupid [Β __Β ] okay so show
me how my stupid [Β __Β ] i'm saying
communism because you're saying things
without substantiating them with any
evidence i'm saying look with theory and
what i know are examples of uh communist
uh ideology and communist policies uh
people would ensure that everybody
people would
like what name name every name every
communist and are you name
you know so much about communism name
every communist are you doing the meme
right now i'm telling you to name one
example that justifies your description
the black panthers for example what did
the black panthers do that's communist
in your description yes they were
feeding every child that came to their
their food banks okay so by that
definition charities would be communist
no
not not exactly because they were doing
it
wait wouldn't fascists also be communist
then because fascists also fed people no
no no it had orphanages and had things
like that hold up there is more to it
there's not only obviously in a system
when they were in the capitalist system
they were trying to do communist like
policies communist you know uh
undertakings and one of those
undertakings was feeding the communi the
community they were in so
hold on so you're so food stamps are
communist
food stamps are a social policy as a
socialist policy if you want to say it
that way okay
specifically would be
for example communism would be if you
have a population of let's say 100
people in your neighborhood and
some people make five thousand dollars
some people make a thousand dollars and
you
um
equally ensure that all these people
make two thousand five hundred dollars
okay um or to a maximum so
you so you don't understand logic so i'm
going to break this down to you i asked
you on what authority do you derive that
definition of communism you give me the
example of something
shut the [Β __Β ] up shut your [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
mouth or i'm gonna shut it for you hey
i'm muting you too listen okay you're
muting me as well okay don't worry i'm
telling you this is for the audience
so what you said was that the black
panthers
who called themselves communists did
something
that justifies your description of
communism they gave
children food on an equal basis
but when other people do that
that same thing they're not communists
like charities for example
so how on what authority do you describe
do you justify this description of
communism
you can't justify the essentiality of
what the black panthers did to communism
so what is communism you can't just
because the black panthers did something
and called themselves communist doesn't
mean that the thing they did was was
communism because other people who are
not communists can do that very same
thing
so that's logic dax it's something vash
i doubt has ever taught you
i'm on meeting you now
okay so listen um
there are
things are nuanced haas
you can have social policies
and you cannot have socialism okay you
can have social policies that attempt to
uh near okay so
you didn't you didn't catch what i said
you didn't catch what i said i'm asking
you
why is this communism on what authority
do you derive this description of
communism where does it come from is
this going to be part of what type of
argument are you trying to formulate i
am asking you
where you derive the authority
of your [Β __Β ] argument
i am using theory that i know
from where what theory should cite
anything cite one thing
a das capitao
does mark say communism is the equal
distribution of resources i don't have i
don't have
a direct quote i'm telling you by unless
you have a specific definition that no
that's not how it works so if you say
for example that
communism is when
i chop my arm off and chop other
people's arms off and i say no where are
you getting shut the [Β __Β ] up and i say
where are you getting that and you say
uh capital i said where in kevin he said
well unless you have a better death no
the burden of you is to justify why are
you why you're saying what you're saying
to the final word uh define something
yeah i am asking you to define i'm
asking you i'm asking you what communism
is you're making it part of your
argument you're going to make something
ladies and gentlemen this is roger's
community by the way
i am telling you you are trying to uh do
or make an argument which
well it's it's it's incumbent on me to
explain or to do hold on you just said
that you just said with confidence
you just hinged your entire circuit of
argumentation
in the beginning that oh you said jimmy
rose a communist he's far from a
communist ministry but you don't know
what a communist is
i know well i know ideologically what a
communist is no you don't i've i've
pressed you to i've pressed you i've
given you so many chances to prove you
know what communism is and you don't i
am telling you it's a
it's specifically for communism it's an
egalitarian way of distributing
resources so
where
where where have you gotten this
description of communism
what what did i tell you i mean uh
mark's
theory nowhere does mark says the
opposite of this mark says that the
equal distribution of resources leads to
inequality that's what he said
i said egalitarian yeah he said the
egalitarian distribution
um
which is associated with the lower stage
of socialism
according to the incredibles is what i
said equitable equitable distribution of
resources
okay
even even that's exactly the point the
equitable distribution of resources
leads to inequality and marx did not
associate that
with communism
as a society he said that was maybe the
lower stage of socialism
but as far as a communist society is
concerned marx never described it on
those terms ever
i i don't
i mean i don't remember every passage of
of any of us i
insisting upon the fact the burden of
you is to prove the contrary what what
is that you have not read a single
passage of marx that should justify what
you're saying is your argument you
[Β __Β ] up what is your argument that you
have not read a single passage of marx
that justifies what you're saying you
[Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] your daughter is a
communist and jimin doria is a communist
you don't know what communism means
and how it is a communist or not because
you don't even know what it means
okay fine listen i am telling you that
he is just a right-winger grifter
and you're also saying black people are
right-wing you're also calling the black
community right-wing yes
racist [Β __Β ] who hates black people
that's what you are you to make any
argument you
you are racist this is what you're doing
who are you racist
you are a racist you are a racist you
are a racist [Β __Β ] i am not yes you are
to know why black people are hesitant to
take the vaccine and it's not because
they're right-wing
so you think the only reason people are
hesitant to take the vaccine is because
they're right wing no there's and it's
not because
that's the main reason i just told you
black people are hesitant to take the
vaccine and it's not because they're
right-wing and you just went and said
exactly so why are the others hesitant
to take the vaccine because they've been
propagandized
there's the right-wingers are
propagandized why believe why why
what do you mean why there's this idiot
that started
why did trump why did trump promote the
vaccines and when he did it his crowd
booed him when he did it
well i mean
i guess it's like um so you're saying
it's a top-down right-wing conspiracy
frankenstein monster kill so so you're
saying you're saying
it's a top-down conspiracy
that
uh that there's anti-valley that this is
created by
right-wing
actors that want to promote anti-vaxx
narratives and it's all coming from
putin or the kremlin in russia or i
don't know where where is it coming from
so how does anyone benefit from people
being anti-vaxx can you answer that
how does the how does the republican
party benefit it's like a right-wing
mentality where they first of all they
can't put their themselves on the shoes
of anybody else uh if it doesn't happen
to them and they can't see it hold on
hold on so
what so does the black community also
does does the black and latino community
also have the right-wing mentality
no no why not
saying that the black and latino
community are right-wing why do you keep
saying that i'm saying you're saying
that
no that's a stupid argument
i am not saying that but what are you
saying
exactly what are you saying exactly what
are you saying that there are different
reasons to be anti-vaxx okay there are
different reasons there's new ones here
there's different reasons black people
are hesitant and i imagine latinos as
well although latinos are generally
right so what is the reason what are the
different reasons
the different reasons are black people
have been screwed over by the government
okay uh
what is taguski uh experiments uh oh
there's other okay okay and all sorts of
reasons so they don't trust the
government is what you're saying
they don't they don't
they have a hesitance to do certain
things they don't trust they don't trust
the government
one of these things in this case is
manifesting itself along with all the
propaganda that's around it to be
anti-vaccine so so you know better than
black people
what do you mean
i mean you can be
wrong about something can you add yes or
no you know more than black people you
can be wrong yes or no you know what's
best for black people there's such a
totalitarian way of thinking but yes or
no yes or no can you answer the simple
yes or no question
a group of people no i don't know more
than an entire society okay but you're
you're answering this in a condescending
way saying well the only reason they're
not getting the vaccine is because
they're being missed i understand i
understand why you would be hesitant
okay so so why why are the white people
hesitant
the white people are hesitant they have
no they have no
basis as the black people do they don't
have the same basis oh sure so so they
so so hold on let me get this straight
so the white people in america have
every reason to trust
uh corporate america and the government
i've seen that but they can't find their
nation they have every reason to trust
the for-profit pharmacy hold on what
you're saying you're saying white people
have every reason to to trust for-profit
pharmaceutical companies and the
government that has given them mixed
signaling with fauci early in the days
of the pandemic no
[Β __Β ] up but the thing is [Β __Β ] up
yeah [Β __Β ] you definitely [Β __Β ] up she
[Β __Β ] up but but but but i thought
there's no basis for why some white
people would be distrustful of the
government i'm saying that the va the
basis for which i would say black people
uh have a hesitance to get vaccinated
because of things like the taguski
experiments so what what is so so we get
it they know what you're actually saying
is that what you're actually saying what
you're actually saying is that black
people have reasons not to trust the
government the question is do white
people have reasons not to trust the
government too
i'm saying that the justification for
being hesitant to getting the vaccine
there is a justification that i can see
in why black people are hesitant what
about for white people i don't see it
they can't use the same one that's for
sure they can't use that that's they
they can't they can't talk about how the
pharmaceutical companies are for-profit
and don't act on the interest of the
well-being of the people but for profit
listen listen they can't talk about that
that's perfectly understandable hey they
can't talk about how fauci politicized
the crisis and the democrats politicized
it from the very beginning excuse me the
republicans politicized this from the
beginning saying that it wasn't an issue
that it was going to disappear and it
was a nothing burger when it was a an
important [Β __Β ] virus that was came
and ravaged so so trump when trump
proposed to shut down the borders what
did the democrats say
but
he's been trying to shut down the
borders on a basis of like who was
muslim brother not like that was in 20
that was in 2017. but he's during the
early days of the pandemic during the
early days of the pandemic in 2020 trump
wanted a total shutdown of the borders
into the us why did the democrats oppose
this
listen
the reasoning that he uses is like if
you have a demagogue that is a xenophobe
and a racist and he just happens to find
the right the right reason to do
something xenophobic and racist you say
oh you must not question it because it
makes sense in this context now who in
the very beginning of the pandemic
politicized the crisis
the president
how
by saying that it was nothing that
nothing you should not be scared didn't
he say he wants a complete shutdown of
travel to the us
from the hot spots not immediately yes
he did
and was he attacked was he attacked was
he attacked for it
uh because oh i i think i i remember
this yeah basically he
tried to stop travel from china
when the majority of the cases that were
detected were coming from europe
so that's why
he
was doing a stupid oopsie based on
racism basically
was so you're so that that was an
example of him politicizing it
yeah because he's just trying to ban
he's trying to ban you do you think it
would have been smart to shut down
travel from the orig the place that it
was ravaging the most
which was europe
well no at the time it was in china
it was not china yes
so the there was no pandemic in china at
the time no there was a pandemic in
china okay
the the issue with this so why didn't
the democrats say why didn't the
democrats say let's also shut down
travel from europe
because what you should have done was
just shut down trouble from europe
the democrats did not advocate for that
no right because well i don't know if
they wanted to shut down or not i'm just
saying they did it they said trump they
said the idea of shutting down was uh
but nobody's making excuses
what about what about dr fauci he [Β __Β ]
up right okay yeah
was that for political reasons or no
i don't i don't know no i don't think so
okay
you talked about the muslim ban you
talked about the muslim ban why did
biden just uh initiate another muslim
ban
bro i am
has i don't i don't like
biden either it's not like um yeah you
want your cake and you want to eat it
too you don't want to be like
you don't want to be held responsible
for anything
no no i prefer obviously you don't want
to be held responsible for anything
listen i prefer biden over trump i mean
there's not much but i think yeah even
though there's no difference
there is difference what's the name name
one name one
one difference yeah um i guess he's not
trying to ban transgender from the
military that's the only one i've ever
gotten out of you people
well that's the only one right now that
i just pulled out of my ass that's the
only one i've ever gotten from you
when i since my first debate since my
first debate when i started live
streaming that is the only talking point
i have ever managed to shake out of you
dumb [Β __Β ]
that's the only one i've ever gotten out
of you i guess uh another different well
and guess what guess what
why do i give a [Β __Β ]
who gets to serve in the military and go
bomb children overseas no i got you no i
got you i'm not in favor of that either
i'm not in favor but you just just
upheld that as an example of why biden's
better so you said you said biden's
better than trump because of that
biden is better because of that he's
less and there's otherwise no difference
he's less of a yeah he he maintains the
status quo if nobody said he wasn't so
what's the difference
uh rhetorically he is pushing the
country less to the right
what is it so it's all about rhetoric
and ideology and meaning
what about in terms of meat and potatoes
and
in terms of meat and potatoes yeah he is
almost
almost identical
okay
so
that's that's the hill you want to die
on really i'm just saying i mean i don't
know how we ended up here but
what just all started because simply
jimmy dore is not communist okay but you
don't know what communism is remember no
brother you don't know what communism is
that's why you would call jimmy dora
communist but i have i have receipts as
far as my knowledge of communism you
have none what is the communistic thing
that he's doing like a communist would
spread his wealth like evenly first of
all jimmy dore is not officially a
communist but he's closer to being a
communist than any other anything he's a
right-wing drifter
you keep saying listen
so i impressed you on the following i
said how was he right-wing you ended up
admitting you're a racist against
you ended up admitting to everyone
you're a racist against black people
when i impressed you on that i asked you
how was he a grifter i said how is he a
grifter you said because he changed his
views on a topic well of course he
changed his views on a topic because he
got more informed
i am telling you oh so he got vaccinated
got more informed and all of a sudden
his anti-vaccine he's not an anti-vaxxer
he is just people
he's just raised questions
against the pharmaceutical companies
asking questions i'm just asking
questions he's sewing doubt and and
we have a population that is like
mentally handicapped okay
that is literally going about their day
without getting vaccinated so you said
you're in favor of free speech in
democracy i can't believe i didn't get
that vaccine uh please i would get the
vaccine now then that then they die and
then every right-winger story it's the
same thing they're in the hospital
they're dying they realize how [Β __Β ] up
they they were and then they're trying
to get the vaccine then do you think
promoting vaccine mandates and stifling
any skepticism of the vaccines helps i
am worth saying don't be does it help or
worsen people's paranoia about vaccines
brother
so what is what is your solution
i am saying there's dumb people you've
got to tell them that they're dumb what
i mean you guys
see where it gets you okay they don't
kill you okay hold on
so you're an elitist [Β __Β ] calling
yourself a communist who believes in
democracy i didn't call myself a
communist so you're you you believe in
democracy right i do believe in them why
should we be ruled by stupid people
why would she ah the manager is now
questioning his commitments hmm what do
you mean
why should we you calling all these
people dumb [Β __Β ] well we're in a
democracy so they their vote is worth
just as much as yours
right but they're stupid people
there are stupid people so what are you
gonna do about it
you have to ensure that stupid people
stop at a stop sign
and if they don't they get a ticket ah
okay
okay my fuhrer
what what do you mean i'm a fuhrer
because i i establish traffic laws if
you stop
you're using traffic laws as an excuse
to basically say
that
you want to force people against their
will to take vaccines
listen
there's nobody's will to stop at a stop
sign you're being forced to do it yeah
just like just like the the camps in
australia it's just like a stop sign
they're just like stop signs
yeah a vaccine yeah yeah just like the
swat team all around on the streets of
sydney and melbourne and victoria yeah
it's just like a stop sign that's a
different thing that's a that's a
lockdown but it's not
listen it's it's like a stop sign right
yo are you saying that
regulations are a slippery slope to
fascism
i don't i think it sounds like what
you're saying right
this is the stop sign that's your
argument you just made that argument
it's it's just a stop sign right
you're saying that if stop sign leads to
fascism if you were a stop sign what
color would you be because i'm hedging
my bets on green because you've been ran
through so many [Β __Β ] times brother
whatever whatever these arguments
how old are you what's your argument
jesus christ i'm telling you that
regulations are not a slippery slope to
fascism and you're pretending like it is
hold on but are you so you're saying
that what they're doing in australia is
fascism you can no
no so what's wrong with it then so
what's wrong with this just like a stop
sign listen there are regulations there
are laws
and if people are okay so in a democracy
are people okay with stop signs
sure would they exist if people weren't
okay with them would there be a problem
would they if people had a problem with
them i imagined that overall they would
go away yes
okay so if we're in a democracy and most
people are against mandates
what do you what are you gonna do about
it if they're stupid people
well if as long as they're less than the
majority uh they're not have to they're
not they're not
they're not no well then they're gonna
have to vote
their voices hurt they are that's why
the democrats are getting rolled in 2022
so wait wait wait so let me get this
straight right we're over what are we at
69 or something percent uh vaccinated
it doesn't matter they're against that
they're against mandates
right right right they're against
mandates but what what mandates are we
talking about is are there mandates yes
in new york they're trying to institute
mandates and people are coming out
against them instituted already
go and look it up they've trying
they've been trying yes is there a
little step is there a lot in the past
they're doing it through the employers
and they're doing it through
institutions
okay so
institutions so private institutions or
or public institutions both
so
private institutions do whatever the
[Β __Β ] they want
okay in public institutions like for
example if you work for the federal
government yeah if the federal
government tells you to get vaccinated
yeah uh didn't you hold
do we get to so didn't you say that you
think the right wing is defined by
individual liberty and meritocracy
over the
over the benefit of so why do you why
are you insisting so much on the liberty
of the private institutions isn't that
right-wing on the liberty of the private
institute yeah isn't that right-wing i'm
saying the laws are in place uh allow
for private companies to do whatever
they want i'm not saying is that good or
bad for one or the other is that good or
bad
i mean
well i guess that's a
as a part of um freedom of speech i
would say it's good but
so it's freedom of speech to have
vaccine employer mandates
you narc manager [Β __Β ] what do you mean
the
first of all i'm not a manager you are a
manager you are a manager and no one
will ever treat you as you're never
going to be one of them
you will never be one of the
boys be better
everyone in your workplace [Β __Β ] hates
you you narc [Β __Β ] snitch [Β __Β ] cctv
camera [Β __Β ] that's what you are as a
matter of fact you're a [Β __Β ] cctv
camera narc [Β __Β ] everyone at your
workplace [Β __Β ] avoids you like the
plague
are you done
go ahead you okay
sounds like you're not okay you knock
[Β __Β ] i'm gonna be all right it's gonna
be all right you knock [Β __Β ] you cc
camera as a matter of freedom
so wait so it's free speech to have
vaccine mandates employer mandates
employers can mandate whatever they want
but is that free speech
well it's part of freedom of speech they
can they can choose what to do with
their they're not forced to do certain
things basically as a as comp as uh the
federal government is the federal
government cannot stifle you for
your freedom of speech while companies
can and in that same vein companies can
mandate that you
have a vaccine what does that have to do
with freedom of speech
uh i mean i didn't mean it like it had
to but that's what you [Β __Β ] said you
stupid [Β __Β ] you brain dead empty-headed
[Β __Β ] he's the thing because
the federal government
can't stifle you in your freedom of
speech okay
what does that have to do with employer
mandates
well it doesn't it does it does but why
did you bring up freedom of speech then
because it's in the same vein the
companies can men can tell you what to
do if you okay so you just conceded on
the argument about free speech you
stupid [Β __Β ]
no i don't know what the argument about
free speech was i i'm not entirely sure
that you made one
uh but the thing is that companies can
tell you if you want to do business with
them
if you want to do business with a
company
okay so so wait wait so if you're an
employee you're just doing business with
the company as an individual
right yeah you can you can leave you can
yeah yeah so isn't that a right wing
argument about private freedom of
individuals
uh um i'm a guest isn't the left-wing
argument that it's not just a matter of
individuals and that when you're working
for a company you're not just doing so
as an individual that there's a degree
of social and public accountability that
affects all of society
isn't that the left-wing position
but you're adopting the right-wing one
specifically here because you want to
because you want to die on the [Β __Β ]
hill of vaccines i'm not i am not
advocating for companies i'm not saying
corporations are the best and they
should have the right to tell you what
to do i am saying that in the world that
we live in
well people people are resisting that
right now
okay quit that's fine if they're doing
more than quit they're going on strikes
yes i got you but here's the thing right
there are justifications and they and
they want the government to step in and
prohibit these uh
forced mandates as unconstitutional the
federal government can't tell
corporations what to do with in that
regard yes they can that's right
firsthand speech because it comes
and moreover the government is adopting
the mandates too now you dumbass yeah
federal government is doing that but
and people are resisting it
here's the thing and you call them all
stupid people who need to follow the
traffic lights
do you understand that there's good
protest and there's bad protests do you
understand that
do you understand what
what of what relevance is your point you
don't understand that there's good
arguments and there's bad arguments you
understand that
you haven't put forward a single
argument you understand how the
charlottesville protesters were
different from black lives matter
protesters do you understand that
what does that have to do with the point
that people are overwhelmingly resistant
a misguided propagandized population
that is wrong about the reasoning for
protesting but is that the majority
i am sane because the majority are
against the mandates
and people
so are you comparing the charlottesville
protest to the anti-lockdown and mandate
protesters
give me an article what's the article on
the on the numbers because you keep
saying this and i don't believe this is
true but let's look it up what is the
what is the website or you can put it
pull it up on your stream i'm watching
uh what is the article that is saying
that it's the majority of the country
that is against uh mandates
so i have to give you an article right
now on the spot and look for one but you
can't you know just give me you
what about when i asked you for
citations about communism and marx and
capitals because it's
those theories am i wrong about what i
said about communism absolutely [Β __Β ]
wrong
yeah about communism
no about everything you're making a
statement a fact about the numbers i do
not know what numbers your you're uh
you're mentioning you're referencing
here because i don't believe i've ever
seen an article and i'm pretty well
informed in this regard about the people
that don't want money
there are there are not any reliable
forms of polling on the question there's
no real okay but you're assuming then so
you're pulling it out of your ass you're
not no i'm not i'm assuming it on the
basis of the unprecedented and
widespread popular resistance to it
listen listen we have the numbers on
people that have gotten vaccinated okay
we have that number and that number
because people are getting vaccinated
doesn't mean that they're in favor of
members
so i am going to go on a limb here and
say that the majority of the country is
not anti-vaxx and it's not anti-vaccine
mandates okay
i imagine that everyone is okay so okay
so try to enforce a vaccine mandate and
see what happens
i mean i'd it's happening look at what's
happening now
listen here goof
what's the percentage of the federal
people what's the percentage of the
federal
employees that didn't get vaccinated i
think it's less than one percent
because they have to
what do you mean they can't quit they
can in protest quit okay well i guess
this is like resistance
but people people are overwhelmingly
against the vaccine mandates
okay so how show me numbers like you're
just pulling out your ass no i'm not
pulling it out of my [Β __Β ] ass i'm
doing it on the basis of the widespread
resistance against
the majority got vaccinated
the numbers that i know the only numbers
that i know of are the the federal
numbers are less than one percent of
people that did not get vaccinated
because people didn't quit their jobs
over it and that wasn't the deal breaker
that means they're against mandates you
stupid [Β __Β ] if you put a gun in
someone's head and say be my slave and
they're still being a slave that doesn't
[Β __Β ] mean they support slavery you
stupid illogical [Β __Β ] use your brain rub
two brain cells in your [Β __Β ] head
together what you're saying doesn't
follow just because people are not
quitting their jobs at the federal level
doesn't mean they support the [Β __Β ]
mandate you stupid [Β __Β ] it means they
did a cost benefit analysis individually
that they can't afford to lose their
[Β __Β ] job or with not wanting to get
the [Β __Β ] vaccine you're such a
[Β __Β ] idiot hey but you what you're
doing is you're deciding on your own
volition that
it's not the way that i'm saying it is
which is that the majority are not
against it and you're just saying they
are against it and all the numbers don't
bear what you're saying they
are against it
okay well look the majority of the
country got vaccinated okay i don't know
and what on what argument or what uh
ideology jimmy dora also got vaccinated
okay sure a lot of the people who you
are calling right wingers skeptical of
what the pharmaceutical companies are
saying about vaccines have gotten
vaccinated
there are reasons to be against
uh pharmaceutical companies
one of them is not their their ability
to create a [Β __Β ] vaccine
why it is not a salient argument to make
against
corporal against pharma corporations why
not so you know everything about how
these vaccines were made well i don't i
don't know exactly how they are made
i don't i don't question how my phone
works
you okay so you're just the dumb [Β __Β ]
idiot who doesn't question things
if my doctor tells me go drink these
pills i don't go investigating how they
produced how they researched i don't i
don't question any of that i grab the
pill and [Β __Β ] shove it in my mouth
well that's you
that's
what do you do bring a [Β __Β ] titration
device and start breaking down
does mark say that he wants to embark on
the ruthless criticism of all that's
existing and spare nothing from
criticism
i don't know fancy fancy quote i guess
fancy quote i guess so jimmy dore's
promoting
a spirit of criticism and critical
thinking and that's the problem that
makes him a right winger the problem is
the framing is anti-vaxxer
not let's be critical of corporations
and
pharma corporations if it was that if it
was that which i am that is what it is
that is what it's [Β __Β ] is you dumb
ass
you should get vaccinated okay because
the scientists behind making these
vaccines have no
have no like interest other than i guess
they're getting who pays them who pays
them
yeah yeah i got you but i got it i got
you i got it
i mean so so hold on did you know that
did you know that did you know that the
people
some of the people closest to the man if
the process of making those vaccines
were the ones who are most hesitant to
[Β __Β ] get it
you know what that wait repeat what you
just said the reluctance of nurses and
other people within the companies
who were actually
close to the process of how the they
know how these vaccines were made and
they know the process of how they were
vetted by the fda
because they were so close to it they're
scared to get the vaccines no that's not
true
that's not true
listen nurses know as much about how
these vaccines are made as much as i do
hold on it's not just nurses
it's not just nurses it's people who are
close to the decision-making process of
vetting the vaccines
and why it happened
are you like what are your implications
here that the vaccine is actually like
that you should be concerned about this
vaccine
is that your implication
i'm telling you that people have a right
to promote criticism of for-profit
manufactured vaccines or at least
critical thinking without you smearing
them as [Β __Β ] right-wingers or
whatever you're saying i'm not smearing
anyone i am not smearing anyone i am
just a racist there are silly arguments
and there are why do you hate black and
latino people there are salient
arguments why do you hate black and
latino people you don't even know what i
look like brother so why do you hate
black and latino people you don't know
what my heritage is or anything don't be
talking about why do you hate black
latino people i am telling you that
black people have a reason a latino
people i have no clue uh and there's no
hatred towards anybody they're just bad
reasons to do things and there's good
reasons to do things do you have a valid
reason to do i actually didn't ask you
about good listen you stupid brain dead
[Β __Β ] i didn't ask you about good or bad
reasons i asked you how you can justify
the claim that right winger is defined
by being anti-vaxxed when there's people
you're not willing to call right-wing
who are anti-vaxx i didn't say that
being right i didn't sing that i'm just
calling jimmy dora right-winger solely
on the basis of him making videos
skeptical of vaccines despite the fact
that
right winger i said he's a right-wing
grifter which what
and have yet to justify i am saying the
majority of this population that is
anti-vaxx i am going on a limb
and i could probably figure out a couple
of articles on this i'm going on a limb
and i would argue that if you're smart
you are you would come with me and say
that the right wing the majority of the
anti-vaxxers are right-wing does does it
make it their position essentially
right-wing
and type the anti-vax position
the position would you're calling
anti-vaxx what jimmy dore's saying
i am saying the position of being
anti-vaxx would it define that define
the anti-vax position
having
been against vaccinations without
actually knowing anything about the
process of vaccine
like so jimmy dore is not an anti-vaxxer
he is pandering to a how how how how
how how
how how how
repeating the talking points
of
antioxidant rhetoric
he's repeating the same thing you should
be questioning these things that you are
repeating the talking points of the ku
klux klan what the [Β __Β ] are you saying
man yeah you're condescendingly saying
black people don't know what's best for
them
how am i how is this being equated to
black people well because you're using
how much of an airy fairy meaningless
[Β __Β ] like the rhetoric sounds
similar they're using similar talking
points and it makes me feel in my tummy
the same way when i hear him in my tummy
it makes me feel the same way that's not
enough to justify the [Β __Β ] statement
that you're [Β __Β ] making
hey uh
well
here's the thing haas um you're [Β __Β ]
poofy you're [Β __Β ] bruce you're
[Β __Β ] punchy manager [Β __Β ] hey what's
your favorite calm down
okay that can incite people to do things
like attack the capital on the 6th of
january for example there's very
different oh oh oh
what about the summer of peaceful
protests in 2020
what about the summer of peaceful
protest what what caused more widespread
damage around the [Β __Β ] havoc and
destruction the [Β __Β ] one day on
january 6 or the protest in 2020 in the
summer which one
i don't know uh one billion dollars i
think it's the last class on the blm
protest that turned okay
but so so so why are you talking to me
right now about january 6th the nothing
burger of january 6th well because one
of them i mean it was a failed coup but
it was a cool
failed coup how
um
they tried to stop an electoral process
wow how by walking into a public
building right and riding in a public
building because they ride it in a
public building right
they attacked guards and went in so when
trump was elected did protesters not
attack guards and police
two in 2016 what about the protest in
2016 after trump got elected was there
any protests to undermine democratic
institutions yeah
like what happened in dc what happened
in dc on the day of trump's inauguration
in 2016 in 2017
i don't know a bunch of posters i don't
know i i don't know it's just the same
[Β __Β ] pretty much happened but were you
there was that your mom's [Β __Β ]
i knew that they made hats out of
excuse me what did you say
i asked you
click video show us what you look like
there it is look at me look what an ugly
[Β __Β ]
eyes what an ugly [Β __Β ] you literally
look you can become my channel you guys
have to see this you guys really have to
see this
hold on i want to show you guys with
this guy he literally looks like goofy
from [Β __Β ] mickey mouse you guys got
to see this that's pretty good
i've never heard that one before
literally an ugly [Β __Β ]
hey
your argument is only based on dumb
stuff like
look at how he looks i'm going to mimic
how he looks from now on give me give me
a sec that's pretty good i'm going to
show you what this guy looks like that's
pretty good
i got to move my my camera
showing all my your mom's dildos
oh my bad i'm sorry guys i apologize
what is that what are you showing
no i just wanted to make sure i didn't
have your mom's dildo in camera is that
no i just put it away don't worry i
changed the angle
we're good now what
what
what did you show
i did i didn't show
as i was explaining to you you got
[Β __Β ] destroyed yeah
absolutely obliterated hey listen here
people
can have bad arguments and protest okay
and i believe that the majority of the
right-wingers not the majority i'm sorry
the majority of the anti-vaxxers are
right-wingers okay
and those people had a bad reasoning for
being for protesting okay are you in the
in favor that has nothing to do with the
arguments at hand that has nothing to do
with the arguments no no no there is
there is because wait which is what
which is what i told you so you have to
understand you brought up
charlottesville as an example
charlotte's bill in no way was
representative of any significant
portion of the population of the
american people but the protest that
you're seeing in new york or thousands
and thousands are pouring out on the
streets even the indicative of some kind
of widespread popular discontent and
rejection of the mandates how is that so
hard for you to [Β __Β ] understand
is there a justification
is there a justification for what for
the majority of people being against it
for the majority of the people being
against but you're the one who said you
believe in democracy you stupid [Β __Β ] so
if you want to start going against the
majority you don't believe in democracy
hey i am in favor
of democracy and i am saying that if the
majority are against this the they
should vote all their representatives
that are voting against their own
interests
but the reality of things is which is
which is what they're gonna do in 2022
by voting red
uh they're going to be
yeah but that's another dynamic that
doesn't much have to do with these
vaccine mandates oh really so so hold on
the midterm voting patterns are not
going to have anything to do with
vaccine mandates well i'm sure i'm sure
that there will be some influence in the
elections on people oh just some
influence right
well i mean yeah there's a bunch of
reasons right there's a bunch of regions
mickey mouse looking [Β __Β ] chucky
cheese looking [Β __Β ] right okay yeah yeah
come down there
i will say
that
um the reason for the right wings still
maintaining a foothold in in politics
and being in control of so many uh
local
um
senates and and whatnot is because of
gerrymandering and if there was it's all
gerrymandering it's all gerrymandering
is that why the mayoral elections were
lost by the democrats just a month ago
gerrymandering right in virginia yeah
i mean that's
part of um no i don't think that was
gerrymandering but they're what about
elsewhere it wasn't just virginia by the
way hold up is gerrymandering not an
issue you're saying what the [Β __Β ] are
you saying
you are going to blame gerrymandering
for the huge shift that's going to take
place of people voting for the
republicans gerrymandering is one of the
many reasons for having this
anti-democratic system that we do have
you stupid [Β __Β ] you stupid [Β __Β ] you just
said that people should vote against the
vaccine mandates if they're against them
one of the ways they're going to do that
is by voting red in 2022. and you just
said when there's going to be a red wave
the main reason is because of
gerrymandering
i'm saying that there's many reasons for
it and i'm telling you that if it wasn't
because of things like gerrymandering
the filibuster the senate that is
undemocrat and unrepresentative of like
the swaths of the population so
it makes it so that like
rural areas somehow have more say
in in politics than urban areas all
these anti-democratic
institutions
why are you rambling like a stupid left
democrat little liberal [Β __Β ] can you
[Β __Β ] stay on the plot because you
just lost the plot you stupid [Β __Β ]
nothing that you're [Β __Β ] saying is in
any way [Β __Β ] relevant to the argument
i just [Β __Β ] brought up about how what
you are doing is advocating for people
to [Β __Β ] vote republican you stupid
[Β __Β ] you just want to keep rambling to
flex your [Β __Β ] knowledge about left
field democrat talking points about the
[Β __Β ] electoral system and it has
nothing nothing to [Β __Β ] do with
anything that was [Β __Β ] said
i can't understand you when you're
playing i don't give a [Β __Β ] if you can't
understand me little [Β __Β ] you seem like
you sound like you didn't understand a
goddamn thing that was said throughout
this entire conversation there are many
reasons
for this right
uh this red wave that that's going to
happen on 2022 okay one of many of those
reasons is that the democrats are
ineffectual status quo maintaining
right wing hold on hold on in virginia
in virginia the democrat who the
republican was up against was a
progressive
no he was not yes he was he was a
progressive
no he was literally against bernie
sanders he was a progressive why did
bernie lose then why did bernie lose
what he he he
i think he went for um
he endorsed clinton he was against like
he even talked against bernie what are
you talking about why did bernie lose
then
what how is that
why did bernie lose because some guy in
virginia who is wasn't a progressive you
just said the reason the democrats lose
is because they're not progressive
enough they're too established
it's because it's anti-democrat no i'm
saying that the biden administration is
doing everything for the for the status
quo
so the establishment okay then why
couldn't bernie win then why did bernie
lose twice why did bernie lose twice why
did bernie lose twice why did bernie
lose twice why did bernie lose twice
window is moving left okay he lost
because of many institutionalized
reasons okay
the democratic parties are [Β __Β ] a
bunch of scumbags that is one of the
reasons why he lost okay okay so we're
going back in this npc dialogue because
you're a stupid sleepy drowsy [Β __Β ] so
let's actually reign it back in
people are against the vaccine mandate
people are against the backseat mandate
people are against the vaccine mandate
you said they should vote for people who
are against the vaccine man who are the
people against the vaccine mandate
that they can vote for
do you hear me
you hear me
answer the question
hey listen
i gotta put my microphone so you can
hear me
can you hear me
answer the [Β __Β ] question
hold up
can you hear me hello what a literal
dumbass
he's literally playing technical
difficulties games because he doesn't
want to answer the question
he's thinking guys give him time to
think
can you hear me give him time to think
give him time to think
can he hear me can i hear him give him
time to think he's thinking let me pee
let
me oh my god i've never seen this
he's he's going to pee and he's going to
go on his phone to look up an argument
but he's going to go on reddit vows read
it guys i'm really in a tough spot right
i'm literally in front of my computer i
can look up anything i want i'm really
in a tough spot right now guys i can't
answer hans's question i'm really in a
tough spot can you help me
i'll give you i'll give you one call and
call in one of your boss buddies and ask
them to answer how to debate brain dead
people
what's that okay wait wait wait i'm
looking for the reddit article
yeah go ahead look for the reddit
article
phone a friend you can phone a friend i
can phone a friend no who are the people
that are going to be opposed to vaccine
mandates that the electorate can vote
for can you listen to me can you hear me
sorry english is not my first language
so you're conceding the debate you just
lost what do you mean is that it you
can't answer the question how did i lose
what happened you're not answering the
question back from the bathroom brother
you have no argument you didn't answer
the question
uh
what's the question
you said they should vote for people who
represent their interests in opposing
the vaccine mandates true or false
through i said that if what party will
those people be in
that they're going to vote for
the republicans okay
the majority was that hard to answer
no i don't understand what so if i'm
right that the majority of people are
against the mandates
i'm not saying the majority are against
the mandates but if i'm right and they
are
they're going to vote for republicans
oh sure
you're you're saying that so what do you
have to say to that
okay
the the thing i have to say against that
is that
republicans okay which are a minority
um are gonna win because of many
institutionalized reasons a lot of which
that has nothing to do with what i said
that has nothing to do with what i said
let me finish a lot of it has to do with
how our system is working which is un
undemocratic
and a lot of it has to do with a crack
back from the elections how our system
works
what about when obama had the
presidency and the other two branches of
government
what what about that
why didn't that get in the way
why didn't he do anything
why didn't this uh republican the reason
republicans win is because the system's
rigged in favor of them okay then why do
democrats
win sometimes sometimes people do give
democrats a [Β __Β ] chance
well hold up hold up democrats are
ineffective trash okay stacks since
you're a stupid [Β __Β ] and i literally
have to [Β __Β ] your skull in real time let
me explain it to you like this dax let
me explain to you the things you're
talking about that give republicans an
institution the things republicans do
that give them an institutional
advantage to put it in your [Β __Β ] soy
[Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] voice
those have been around forever
yes so how are you going to explain
the
unprecedented red wave in 2022
well you are it's not always a red wave
it wasn't a red wave in 2020 it wasn't a
red wave in 2012 it wasn't a red wave in
2008 so why are we seeing a red wave in
2022 specifically specifically
specifically why we still haven't seen
it but i assume that it will happen why
specifically why specifically why
specifically why
is specifically why yeah okay
is english is not your first language i
sure hope not specifically why
specifically why listen specifically
yeah
there are many reasons specifically what
is the reason no but you're uh you
shouldn't give reasons that have been
here forever because they have no
explanatory value for a specific
situation
every time
that there is a change in executive
administration
there is a crack back from the other
party that takes control usually of the
other oh like in 2018
well didn't that exactly happen no it
didn't
there was no blue wave there was no real
blue wave we took control of the of the
house you didn't take the senate
okay we we the republicans are going to
take both the house and the senate next
year
sure thing okay listen
not every year is the same not every
crack back is the same
whatever the case may be i am telling
you this
there are reasons to be ex skeptic of
pharmaceutical companies
one of them is not how they made this
vaccine
do you know
i'm just saying that what's this how do
you know how do you know how do you know
what's what would be the incentive to
make a bad vaccine
it's not that there would be an
incentive to intentionally make it bad
it's that there would be an intention to
rush it out on a for-profit basis where
you're the well-being of the people is
not your one number one priority profit
is
i understand that now there's like three
so it would be insufficiently attentive
to the health needs of the people no
longer okay so you're still concerned
about it like like 20 years i'm giving
you a legitimate reason about why people
might question pharmaceutical companies
no listen that's not the reason why this
is this is not a criticism so what's the
reason what's the reason what's the
incentive for
what's the what's the reason then what's
the reason they've been propaganda why
well i don't know what the incentive for
the [Β __Β ] that started this well why
did you ask me the [Β __Β ] incentive for
the [Β __Β ] pharmaceutical companies you
stupid [Β __Β ]
well i'm asking i'm telling you what the
insane like and how much more student
debt do you have to pay off the argument
i have no student the argument is so
idiotic that the pharmac that you would
make about pharmaceutical companies like
there's so many things that you could
criticize for example that why is it
idiotic
that they would make a bad a bad vaccine
that they would yeah why why is it
idiotic okay here's the thing it's
idiotic because you
don't question
any medicine until this now
well not you but the figurative you the
the you that would be against vaccines
because all of a sudden you're concerned
about the methods that they use to
generate this vaccine okay people people
do you know that most people do not use
health care liberally in general in this
country
i don't know and people do question
things like gmos and
things all the time that they you take
for granted people do question that [Β __Β ]
it's the pushback from the questioning
that has accelerated people's paranoia
about it it's precisely because there's
so much sense what is your solution guy
the solution is to have a free fair and
open discussion about this
okay but what you're saying is like
without ideological smears and talking
about this is right-wing this is
whatever no you should give people the
chance to be able to argue this and your
pushback is only making them more
paranoid and if you're right you should
be able to defend that openly if you're
right yeah perhaps there are there are
salient arguments like what what what do
you say to a
intolerant person that is against gay
people that is against black people that
is against women like
what do you what do you tell them
what do you tell them well i i don't
know i i wouldn't be tolerant of the
intolerant like i am intolerant so
according to you someone who has
skepticism toward vaccines is the
equivalent to someone who is intolerant
of gay people and black people yeah i
don't i don't let anybody there you just
said yeah you just said yeah no i didn't
hear exactly what you said what i'm
saying is if you're intolerant of black
people and gay people i am intolerant of
you i don't care about the arguments
though so are our vaccines a protected
class
no but i'm saying if your arguments are
like
unfounded i am not going to how do you
know they're unfounded you have to prove
they're unfounded so your your argument
was not actually based on uh knowledge
when you said that you don't want to be
tolerant of the intolerant it's based on
morality right you're saying something
based on morality so it doesn't require
any knowledge about black people or gay
whatsoever it's just the fact that
they're other human beings that they're
part of your moral system right when
you're talking about vaccines you're not
just talking about morality you're
saying you know that they're wrong how
do you know they're wrong
how'd i i don't know that they're wrong
i don't know i don't know i'm just a
[Β __Β ] sheep i know that they're not
founded like you can how do you know how
do you know how do you know
although if you say you know if this is
why i brought up the intolerance to the
intolerant if
for example racists or white
supremacists say that they are superior
to black people thank you
why okay they say i'm superior to black
people because of x or y their skulls
are smaller or they you know the melanin
gets in the way or whatever they may say
okay
those arguments you want to entertain i
am saying i am not going to entertain
wait you don't entertain those arguments
because on the basis of morality because
it's about morality you stupid [Β __Β ] not
science it's about morality when you're
talking about vaccines it's not the same
thing
it's well it is just admit this for me
go ahead and admit this for me when i
say it when i say it when i say it's
going to make your [Β __Β ] wet right when
i say because it's going to be so true
you're going to be so open to what i'm
saying right now because it's so [Β __Β ]
true it's going to you're going to feel
like something's inside you right that's
how it's going to feel let me tell you
what you're basically just saying you're
drawing a line around your liberal
discourse everything outside of your
liberal discourse you're not going to
entertain it because it threatens your
ideological worldview anything inside of
your discourse makes you comfy and cozy
because it reaffirms your sense of
safety guarantee and comfort about what
you think this world is
there are arguments that are sailing i
can entertain them as in hey let me see
why are you against that vaccine what is
oh okay i am concerned about the vaccine
because it's been out too
too little time they they just pushed it
they uh it's just the pharmaceuticals
trying to make money i i listen i hope
you never tell people you're vaccinated
because you are the worst ex
i hope you don't though because because
because imagine if these conspiracy
theorists look at you like will i become
like a dumb [Β __Β ] like dax if i get
vaccinated
but they get to [Β __Β ] your mom
what did you say
you just heard me why do you make me a
republican no no let me ask you a
question so would you say that to my
face ask your mom you would say that to
my face
i mean i would say it to your dumb face
yeah you would say to my face i mean
really
oh maybe maybe to be nice i wouldn't i
don't know would you say that to my face
yeah
like are you saying like on on the basis
of me being what scared of you
i think so oh dude i would totally tell
you that you would
yeah okay
what if i told you you might have it for
my what if i told you you might have an
opportunity to say it to my face
i mean
sure
where you at where's my opportunity
what state are you in ask ask your mom
for we might we better have an in-person
debate where you could say this to my
face so what state are you ask
your mom are you scared hey listen
are you scared
i have all sorts of stuff going on for
which i couldn't uh entertain this
opportunity unfortunately
it sounds like you're a little bit
scared
i'm totally scared why are you scared
we're just gonna have an in-person
debate i'm quivering in your mom's boots
okay listen yeah you [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] hey
by the way by the way your mom my
[Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] is down her [Β __Β ] throat
whenever i want by the way your mom
would actually [Β __Β ] me that's the
difference your mother would actually
[Β __Β ] me my [Β __Β ] would actually be inside
of her [Β __Β ] and she would squeal she
would squeal in pleasure over the fact
you understand so you're you're making
your mom joke and joking your mother
would find me actually irresistible your
[Β __Β ] mother would actually find me
irresistible she would actually choke on
my [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] is the [Β __Β ]
difference
i hope your [Β __Β ] is better than your
arguments because yes as [Β __Β ] yeah yeah
what are you gonna you're gonna talk
about arguments as if you've had a
single [Β __Β ] argument this whole
[Β __Β ] time that hasn't been destroyed
what arguments have you [Β __Β ] brought
forth you can't even rub two [Β __Β ]
brain cells together for if your life
[Β __Β ] depended on it what arguments
have you [Β __Β ] made every intelligible
argument in your stream today has been
from me
really every intelligible argument has
been from you really and everything yeah
all you've done is pivot like for
example when i asked you why is jimmy
dore right wing
people are right-wing but it's like a
form of propositional logic that
wouldn't hold as a logical [Β __Β ]
argument even if the majority of [Β __Β ]
vaccinated people are right wing and
jimmy dore is supposedly getting an
audience of anti-vaxxed people you
failed to demonstrate or prove the
essentiality of right wing you haven't
proved it's essential that's why i've
been trying to get around this whole
[Β __Β ] time and you failed every step
of the [Β __Β ] way you stupid dumb
[Β __Β ] dog [Β __Β ] for brain [Β __Β ]
listen here
jimmy dore is a communist
dude he keeps circling back you don't
even know what communism is
you don't even know what communism is
listen here i don't know what communism
hold on you said you've made every
intelligible argument right but we're
going down a dialogue loop tree where
i'm guiding you through [Β __Β ] we've been
over before
because when i catch you in a [Β __Β ]
moment you pivot every time i catch you
you pivot every time i ground you you
pivot that's what you do you pivoting
[Β __Β ] you pivoting [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
i don't know what pivots you're talking
you pivoting [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] ask your mom
about the [Β __Β ] pizza pivots like when
i turned her around and [Β __Β ] threw
her against the [Β __Β ] wall ask your
mom about the [Β __Β ] pivots
when i carried her around my bedroom and
turned around every every which way and
[Β __Β ] her from every angle possible and
i pivoted every single [Β __Β ] angle
your [Β __Β ] simps were mad that i was
making your mom jokes okay yeah it was
maybe i was making your mom jokes but
your mother would actually [Β __Β ] me is
the difference i don't know your mother
would actually [Β __Β ] me i can't believe
dax was making your mom arguments that's
when he lost and you're just making them
but i can't but your mother would
actually [Β __Β ] me
yeah totally okay she would she really
would she totally would she actually
would she actually would [Β __Β ] you too
man i actually could [Β __Β ] your mother i
would [Β __Β ] you too i your mother
actually would let me [Β __Β ] your jawline
is pretty hot i gotta admit
you look like a deformed creature from a
[Β __Β ] experiment you look like an ugly
[Β __Β ] oh no
well there goes my chances okay yeah um
here's the thing in the why i'm
criticizing you is that
i heard your your is that hake hake is
that uh that guy
on your stream i don't know is that her
name
now the grand finale is this
are you aware of some of the comments
vaush made you're a vosh fan right
uh
i'm sure yeah so you think voss is a guy
to listen to and he's a you know he's
he's someone to watch well some things
he says are are
beyond what i would say are okay but
yeah what like what what does he say
that you don't find okay uh the tactical
n word that he talks about oh
um
so why do you follow and watch
people who advocate for pedophilia
advocates for pedophilia yeah
do you advocate for pedophilia because i
follow you too no but you actually are
following someone who said things like
he wants child sex robots in the future
and he thinks he said that yeah
okay he also made a lot of comments in
destiny's discord
um alluding to
the fact
that i'm not tying my entire moral
premises you're not you're not you're
not so are you going to defend vaj for
the [Β __Β ] he said
i wasn't even did this
what about what about when vows said
what about when vows said there is
nothing morally wrong with consuming
child pornography
he said that yes he did
okay taking you at face value that's
i don't know why we're talking about
wash exactly
well that's how you found me isn't it
because you're you're a voss viewer and
you're evolving
thanks to hippy dippy
you're a no you're a vows fan that's how
you found me today
that's how that's how you manage to
muster that's how you manage to muster
the courage
that's how you manage to muster the
courage to say
that that i said that jimmy dore was a
communist because that's what vaush said
that i said
no no so if you if you look out how long
i've been following you i've been
following you
since i saw you on hippie dippy okay
yeah but today you came on because of
valsha's coverage of me today i came on
yeah because i was bored and because
that was wrong
i was bored followed channel because i
was bored
so so do you have a humiliation fetish
do you like being destroyed and
conquered and dominated i don't think
that that's what happened here today oh
really how do we measure that one's in
the chat if i dominated him twos if uh
if that's not what happens
i'll write one two look do i have 100 do
i have 680 simps
i just i just wrote so hold on do i have
an army of 680 sims wait can i ride one
again
one
do i have an army of six do i take that
take the spam thing off so i can do one
again okay do i have an army of six
hundred and eighty simps hey shut the
[Β __Β ] up that's just why i have an army
of 680 sims
you have bad ticks you seem to be saying
things like
you know jimmy dore is a communist and
yeah i never said that i never said that
you said that
then roll it back and give us a direct
just like how mark said that communism
is the equal distribution of resources
right
that says exactly what communism is i
didn't say that i told you it's theory
and yeah i told you to cite some theory
and there is none but what do you want
me uh like i don't memorize quotes like
you do well why do i need to memorize
quotes can i you don't have to memorize
anything just give me one one thing that
substantiates one piece of authority
that makes your description legitimate
but so you here listen the only way that
this argument of yours is makes sense
yeah i can't do it he can't do it he
can't fight i'm doing it wrong about
what i said communism is but you're
telling me communism is not what i said
it was inequitable distribution no it's
not no it's not equitable no no it's not
because it's nowhere to be found by any
major community because there is no
major communist thinker who has said
anything remotely close to that listen i
got you but i've seen policies in
different countries including
like what where there's a distribution
of wealth in a way
okay then how are they how do you
justify the association with communism
well that's those are communist ideals
communism where do you get that from
like
theory
what theory tell me what this theory
you're referring to is is it your theory
no it's marxist leninist you know
then cite something cite one thing in
das capital that confirms this theory
you say your communist name every
communist sentence is that you is that
these is that the equivalent of what i'm
asking you to do okay let's let's yes
it's it is the equivalent no it's not
the [Β __Β ] equivalent no matthew for
one sentence the bare minimum of
anything from das capital that justifies
your description of communism i didn't
ask you for everything i asked you for
one thing i asked you for one article of
evidence one article of evidence one
article of evidence
definition britannica ideology communism
political and economic doctrine that
aims to replace private property and a
profit-based economy with public
ownership and communal control of at
least the major means of production and
the natural resources of society what
wherein even even if we accepted
britannica's definition even if we
accepted the authority of the [Β __Β ]
britannica scholars
communism is thus a form of socialism a
higher and more advanced form according
to its advocates exactly how communism
differs from socialism has long been a
matter of debate hey you stupid [Β __Β ] you
stupid mumbling stomach
hey you stupid
the [Β __Β ] dictionary that you just
cited instead of the actual communist
thinkers even if we accepted that one
accepted
billions
and profit-based economy with the public
ownership and communal control communal
control of at least the major means of
production and the natural resources of
our society well i have the mutual
control you stupid npc [Β __Β ] you stupid
[Β __Β ] your ugly stupid [Β __Β ] face
produces nothing but stupid ugly things
nowhere in that definition do you hear
anything about the equal distribution of
resources nowhere nowhere nowhere
nowhere nowhere nowhere nowhere nowhere
your elitist [Β __Β ] i was using the
knowledge i have on the theory to what
theory okay what theory what theory
where you cited the definition as an
example of theory the definition doesn't
add up i talked about it without giving
you the definition until now because you
keep pretending like it is inherent you
go on you kept saying okay come on
stupid [Β __Β ] stupid [Β __Β ] stupid [Β __Β ]
stupid [Β __Β ] stupid [Β __Β ] stupid [Β __Β ]
stupid [Β __Β ] you said you said you said
the theory i said what theory you have
given me nothing to this day
so after three hours you've given me
nothing do you want like what am i
supposed to say one thing one thing that
one source of evidence one piece of
evidence just one
okay so let me see let's
check it out communist
country
slash policies
let's see let's see if i'm uh
if i am even close let's see
so
um and this is theory right this is your
you're going to cite some theory no no
no no i told you from das capital
where okay i am specifically challenging
your claim about that
listen listen
there's all sorts of
like okay
you're not going to cite it to me do you
remember vaguely vaguely described to me
how does capital talks about the
distribution of resources equally
vaguely recollected yeah by by the um
by the abolition of private property
yeah vaguely describe that to me where
marx is talking about the distribution
of resources what do you want me to like
open the book like memorize the book now
know the book now if you don't reference
a sentence oh you said you read dust
capital i want the bare minimum where
in what way does capital advocate for
the equal distribution of resources
um where you
abolish private property
how does that follow how does it follow
first of all where does mark say the uh
abolition ops fong in german rather than
alfie alfred sublation of private
property second how does that connect to
the equal distribution of resources
um
i don't know that it's a very like
dogmatic way of seeing things is that it
has to be the equal distribution but it
is in most cases an advocacy for the
equal deduction i'm just asking where
you're getting that from
am i wrong like uh yeah you are wrong
but where are you getting where are you
getting it from
enlighten me
because this whole thing was for you to
make an argument right if i'm wrong no
this whole thing no no you you can't
seem like you're not you didn't come
here posturing as my student you came
your power string as a challenger which
means you should be informed enough to
know about what communism is before you
get in my [Β __Β ] vc and try to argue
and challenge me about my understanding
of who is and isn't a communist
well i can tell you that
from the
from the very basic definition that i
found in britannica i can tell you
that uh jimmy dore doesn't fall in the
category of trying to push for social
socialist policies that would extend to
communism if he is trying to advocate
that's the worst argument to make i mean
even if i were to entertain the idea
that britannica is the authority on what
communism is not
but even if i even if i conceded that to
you and even if i conceded the idea that
being a communist means advocating for
social policies which ultimately will
lead to communism actually every single
policy jimmy dore does advocate for is
that he is the he's a medicare for all
fanatic he promoted medicare for all
marches which the squad and the rest of
the so-called socialists like yourself
and vows derided him for jimmy dore has
been an ardent advocate for the closest
thing to mainstream socialist as you put
it policies in the u.s that we can even
think of every single [Β __Β ] one
um if he
so here's the thing right if you have a
pivot that is a right-wing pandering you
become a right-wing pander so does jimmy
is jimmy dore against medicare for all
uh i don't know what is his views on
economic policy are they right-wing too
no clue i don't know
but you called him a right winger so why
does jimmy jordan curiously have these
very left wing
i called him a right-wing grifter and
what yeah i mean yeah but that's curious
it's curious that he's it's cured listen
you stupid [Β __Β ] you know why you're a
dumb stupid [Β __Β ] because even fat ass
[Β __Β ] like vaush will try and say like
oh he's a nazbal which means he's
economically left but he's socially
conservative which he's not
i'm socially conservative by the way
you are out here just calling him a
right winger how i am in what universe
i am saying he's a grifter
okay who's not what's an example of
someone who's not a grifter on the
internet
i don't think you're a grifter okay well
who else
uh i don't think hassan abby is a
grifter hassan's not a grifter
why not
uh because he doesn't seem to be
changing his positions his ideological
positions based on
personal gain
really
for example if oh wait wait hold on
really
yeah for example if for example
okay and he stopped advocating for
taxing rich wait wait wait right
first of all first of all first of all
before we talk about that
how about i show you a video of hassan
from 10 years ago where he's talking
about teaching people how to spit game
and he's saying a lot of really weird
sexist predatory stuff
frat boy type of [Β __Β ] what about do you
think he would say that today
um
i i think that you can have bad takes
and not be a grifter and then change
your takes and not be a grifter so how
do you tell your difference how do you
tell the difference if you're doing it
for uh like interests that are not your
own how do you know how do you know
what what who would have been interested
in him doing that on changing his uh
views
the the left-wing [Β __Β ] echo chamber
yeah but he it's like a fight and he
wouldn't get he would get canceled today
if he did that why would he
are you kidding me yeah that's i
understand that but if i have a position
and i change it based on my own
interpretation right if i say like so
how do you know how do you tell the
difference i was i was homophobe before
now i'm no longer homo how do you how do
you know the difference
if you're
doing it for
capital interest if you're doing to make
money i think okay so hassan admitted
that he was transphobic years ago
okay me too so okay so hassan according
to you
does does he gain more or less money
by disavowing his transphobic views
that wouldn't
that's not what i'm saying
that's nice would he still have 50 000
subscribers on twitch listen that's not
beautiful would he still have 50 000
subscribers on twitch i don't know what
you're saying i'm telling you that if
you
change your views
based on someone else's interest because
you're getting paid to do so then that's
bad okay you change your mind so okay
okay okay okay okay and i'm telling you
that hassan has changed his views
because of the
interest of the democratic establishment
what no he changed his mind we probably
like and i'm sorry i said i was
transformed i don't mean that i'm
transferring i just don't understand
transgender but i'm not transfer the
same way i'm not home about but
um
i am saying i for example don't
understand things like transgender so
who's paying so
nobody's paying me to be and to be so
but but jimmy dore's being paid jimmy
dore's being paid to voice skepticism
against the pharmaceutical companies i
am saying that jimmy dore
okay
might be posturing himself to be
to shift like
uh dave rubin did what is stupid [Β __Β ]
what is stupid [Β __Β ] what do you mean
dave dave rubin was bought off
right
so is jimmy dore being bought off i'm
saying that he's posturing himself to do
so by who
whoever buys off uh
dave rubin
okay you think jimmy dore is doing that
i think he's posturing himself on the
basis of what evidence
that he's pandering to a right-wing
audience
which is anti-vaxx
he's pandering to a right-wing audience
how how is he pandering to them because
of the anti-vice position which is the
majority right winger is is is that
jimmy's own position or is he just doing
it to pander i think he's doing it to
panic how do you know how do you know
how do you know because not 12 months
ago he had a different position than
what he's abscribing now but hassan also
had a different position than what he's
subscribing to now years ago in your
mind as i said before you can change
your mind and not be so so what's the
difference then he changed his mind
brother there's new ones okay
there are reasons to do so that would be
self-interested okay that would be
something then how do you how do you
know if it's self-interested or not how
do you tell the difference
based on what somebody else is telling
you so if somebody else is saying you
should say this and you say okay
then you
are if you change your mind on the topic
because somebody else paid you then you
are aggressive who paid jimmy dore
i am saying i am saying i am saying who
paid him
shift
okay
so you just said jimmy's a grifter and
hassan's not but this is the same
[Β __Β ] situation i wouldn't i don't
think you're a grifter for example you
said but jimmy's a grifter and hassan's
not but it's the same [Β __Β ] situation
i don't think that you're doing you have
these takes and i don't what are you
doing
what a little somebody's stupid [Β __Β ]
stupid [Β __Β ] same [Β __Β ] i don't
think
guys one for the chat if this guy just
doesn't have a brain he's literally just
a stupid [Β __Β ] literally just a stupid
[Β __Β ] who doesn't understand that you
just
[Β __Β ] were confronted with the same
circuit of logic as applied to hassan
but for a mysterious reason that has yet
to be clarified it doesn't apply to
jimmy dore only hassan gets a pass not
jimmy dory
man here's the thing
not that
one gets a pass and the other doesn't
okay
life is nuanced you see and there are
are there are arguments that you can
make for one over so make them
i am telling you i don't see
that hassan well in this case hassan i
just chose one i also chose you i don't
know why we're not talking about you but
i guess hassan is not changing his
position based on
personal interest
of like somebody getting paid for
example
but on the same basis that you say jimmy
dore's changing his views on the basis
of personal interest of getting paid i
can apply that same reasoning to hassan
telling you for example something he
didn't change can you address that
argument can you address that argument
yeah right now
he has a house he's become a millionaire
and he's like you know what i'm still
advocating for higher taxes for the rich
yeah but that's not that's not the
comparison i was using hold on
that's not the comparison i was using
jimmy dore also got a house and he's
still advocating for higher taxes on the
rich so that's not the [Β __Β ] argument
i was using now was it i was saying that
hassan has adopted all these woke lefty
positions for personal interest and
personal gain it has the same amount of
merit as the claim you're making that
jimmy dore adopted the anti-vaxx
position supposedly even though he
didn't in order to grift to right
wingers it's the same exact
circuit of reasoning but apparently
you're just only calling jimmy dore the
grifter
yes because he seems to have changed his
mind on a specific topic so
has hassan you literal stupid dumb [Β __Β ]
you actually stupid [Β __Β ] there's a lot
of people that changed their minds on
things well guys once in the chat if
this guy is so stupid it is actually
giving you an aneurysm and he is
literally like it's unbelievably [Β __Β ]
stupid am i the only one who can't
[Β __Β ] believe what i'm hearing right
now there you go i got to put one okay
so listen here's the thing right
there are arguments that are salient one
argument that is not salient is saying
i cannot discern any change of mind
whatsoever i can't ever
possibly determine which one is because
of grifting and which one is because of
an ideological you know yeah
enlightenment okay i cannot determine or
deserve yeah how do you determine and
discern those things can those okay so
it seems to you that those things cannot
exist either so my question to you is
can there be someone changing their
positions for personal gain interest not
because of ideology
yeah
okay and you do not think that jimmy
dore is doing that no
no okay and you do think that hassan
abby is doing that not necessarily no
i asked you
why you're saying jimmy dore is doing it
but not hassan i'm using your reasoning
i'm using your reasoning i repeated
myself multiple times not 12 months ago
this guy was specifically very not
anti-vaccine and hassan also changed his
views
on a number of things in the same
[Β __Β ] time span as well i know what's
happening now in society what's
happening now is a a harsh reaction
there's
you look like a five nights at freddy's
mannequin or some kind of i don't even
know if you're a human right you look
you're a [Β __Β ] npc you you don't like
you just keep saying the same thing am i
going crazy
my argument is that you're an npc
you are a [Β __Β ] npc and jimmy dore is
a communist hey listen he keeps
repeating the same thing jimmy dore's a
communist it's because it was when you
don't know what's coming i'm gonna give
you one last chance to redeem yourself
so far you've been [Β __Β ] you've been
utterly [Β __Β ] so this is your last shot
and your last chance if you cannot if
you cannot break through this [Β __Β ]
argument communism what what is every
communism in the world
okay listen you're an idiot okay hey hey
i'm an idiot i'm gonna i'm gonna mute
this dumb [Β __Β ] i'm gonna mute this don't
forget you're gonna mute this stupid
[Β __Β ] i'm sick of hearing the [Β __Β ]
sound of his [Β __Β ] voice he's
um
is this real life
i asked him for one example to j he left
what a [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] what a [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] thanks for your balls by the way i
just took your manhood
i just took your manhood by the way
thanks for leaving i just took your
[Β __Β ] manhood you little [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
you little [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] little [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ]
you [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
utterly [Β __Β ] dominated and [Β __Β ]
humiliated
you're not even a man anymore you're not
even a [Β __Β ] man anymore for doing
that you're not even a [Β __Β ] man
anymore what a [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ] what a
literal [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
thank you paper win appreciate you thank
you so much paper win and thank you to
everyone else who subbed i didn't get to
it but this dude such a dumb [Β __Β ]
this [Β __Β ] who got [Β __Β ] verbally
destroyed
out of my chat little [Β __Β ] thank you
reaper the creeper
you had your chance to talk your [Β __Β ] in
my vc but you ran away so run aw run out
of my [Β __Β ] chat too your keyboard
wore your little [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
but this dude said name every communist
theater like mocking me when i asked him
to name one thing
one thing and he says name you say
you're telling me to name every [Β __Β ]
word in capital and memorize capital and
name everyone
am i insane am i insane am i [Β __Β ]
insane
thank you so much reaper the creeper
let's continue this vow [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] took so [Β __Β ] long let's continue
the [Β __Β ] vow [Β __Β ]
it's about made up words and false
ideals things like racism and just
division
is an angel of light and evil is subtle
it sounds good it's an imitation of
logic and morals so
oh merrick did you did you see
perspective philosophy's complete
meltdown on twitter how he was talking
about how just people should want um
punishment did you see that
i'm telling you man strongly disliking
me should be in the [Β __Β ] video i
should be in the dead that dude was just
[Β __Β ] exhausted exhaustingly [Β __Β ]
stupid just an exhaustingly stupid [Β __Β ]
sam because it predicts so many other
mental illnesses holy [Β __Β ]
he was like uh i don't understand the
point of rehabilitating murderers you
can't un-kill the victim all you should
want is vosh saying that anyone who
advocates
thank you for robbie
is boss saying thank you so much for
robbie appreciate you man is val saying
that every single person
who rejects the view of rehabilitative
justice has a mental illness
because that would mean the majority of
people in the u.s have a mental illness
there's punishment or something it's
like defending capital capital
punishment
very philosophy okay
that's the majority of people
it's an extremely reasonable thing to
believe in capital punishment in 2021
there's nothing mentally deranged or ill
about that at all okay much thinking
no he's insane there wait what does vows
know about philosophy why does he use
the word philosophy what does that word
mean to him
what is i think he's a what is he a
wikipedia philosopher he's a wikipedia
philosopher
yeah 100 as are all people who dislike
me hmm
you got to thank very much james right
only statement and mel and i want to let
you know folks modern day is a neutral
platform he's a complete wikipedia
philosopher
on science religion and politics and in
fact if you haven't already hit that
subscribe button as we've gotten more
juicy basically in particular at the
bottom right of your screen we're
excited as stefan molyneux and destiny
face off the last week of this month you
don't want to miss it so hit that
subscribe button that notification bell
reminders with that thank you very much
james and infrared the floor is all
yours for openness wait staphon molyneux
he's the platform from everything okay
you know what's so weird it's actually
[Β __Β ] unnerving
i've said this before
but why does vaush talk like destiny you
know what vosh is he's like a mentally
deranged destiny fan that got big but
he's still like a freak like a weird
destiny stalker type of guy like you
know how destiny does that thing where
he's like wait why is this ah okay and
he just like does that okay thing where
he's like where is it okay i saw okay
the world's stupid okay
he literally just it's a carbon copy
from [Β __Β ] destiny and it's so uncanny
thank you mid nates appreciate you man
thank you so much so much midnates
appreciate you man it's so weird isn't
that weird it's so [Β __Β ] weird
it's so weird
yeah i'll take i'll take pride in one
thing as much as i like debates and i
know i don't do them as often as you
guys want i'll try to work on that this
month but like i never go i never go
scraping the barrel you know what i mean
stefan has been platformed from
everything he's like he's like a nobody
now he gets like 5k i can't wait for
these lefties who think that
people getting the platform means
they're going to be irrelevant in the
long run because
like i said there's a whole shadow
internet out there which
you know
you have no idea you have if you think
that like every it's all the surface web
still dude you don't know what what
you're in for
that's literally the whole reason i
think my media theory analysis of q anon
is that like
as an ideological analysis what they
really mean by the storm is like
you have neglected the shadow web like
this
there's gonna be consequences as far as
like the nature of media is concerned
about that it's
it's not gonna stay as it is you know
views per bit shoot video you know
sure like the storm is internet 3.0
that's how i've always seen that you
know
i want to be honest i want to ramble too
much but um i think in the united states
this is one of the things that infrared
wanted to embark upon to kind of change
people's experiences
that there's a lot of confusion about
what communism meant in other countries
he's such like a clueless fat [Β __Β ] he's
just like he has his [Β __Β ] mouth open
he's like
huh
when he laughs
wait you're applying he just refers to
himself for several reasons there has
come to be this kind of confusion in
this country
this is something that fat ass does
often where he'll just be like i don't
know about things so i'm gonna like
you realize infrared's a collective of
11 people
so no i'm not infrared
he doesn't even try to not make himself
look stupid he just doesn't care if he
looks stupid or not like you know you
look stupid right you look stupid you
look stupid right now
does he does he not have any shame he
looks stupid
i've said multiple times it's a
collective of 11 people why do you not
care about looking stupid you literally
look like a dumb [Β __Β ]
association with communism in the
experience of communism in russia and
china existing communist states that's
right there's this association with that
with the current there there we go with
the destiny okay it's so weird this
guy's creepy he's like
i want to know like
the real vows is this
just those dead eyes that's all the real
vows is because this vash you're seeing
that's a simulation of destiny that's
like a complete form of copying destiny
it's like he's a skin walker it's like
he's he's walking in destiny's skin
but what when you take with the skin
away
what is there is my question like who is
the real vosh well you want to know who
the real vows is
he used to go by irish lady and he was
in destiny's discord and he used to talk
about child sex robots that's the real
vaj
um you know the deep state the
democratic establishment and george
soros the ngos and um the kind of davos
agenda for the great reset there's this
association between communism and these
things i think because in the united
states the democrats are considered left
and the republicans are considered right
so people just have this idea that
communism is just the like ultimate um
logical conclusion of the democrats or
agenda in reality i think when you um
in the proper context oh infrared is
like his brand he doesn't call himself
infrared okay okay gosh i didn't know
that
you will find that um
well for one there's a historical uh
tension between communism and religion
but that wasn't uh necessarily because
communism is inherently anti-religious
or even inherently atheists it was
because of the religious establishments
that communists were going up against
and their respective countries were
deeply rotten and corrupt to the core
they defended the interest of the very
corrupt ruling class and you know many
normal ordinary religious minded people
could even see that within these very
same religious establishments you had
utmost cynicism and hypocrisy these
people that were occupying these uh
roles of religious power didn't actually
even believe in it themselves there
wasn't really any authentic faith there
for that reason communists uh had taken
in the very beginning a negative stance
toward religion but as the experience of
communism was able to mature more
especially now this this is true marx
was marx wasn't like anti-religion
explicitly he was anti-the way religion
as an institution organized religion uh
it was was used essentially to to
promise workers a reward in heaven as a
way of keeping them from getting too
invested in a reward on earth you know
the
opium of the masses etcetera etcetera
but marx wasn't like holistically
anti-theist i don't think you know this
is an example of a guy who's so stupid i
don't know like does being fat take away
from uh blood to your brain or something
i don't know this is a guy who's so
[Β __Β ] stupid that
not only is he wrong about what i said
and what i meant to say he's actually
also wrong about what marx said so it's
like he's two layers of wrong he's wrong
about what i meant he's also wrong about
what mark said that i was
referencing right
so
um to be clear
when marx talked about the opium of the
masses he was not talking about the way
in which religion was used by the ruling
class to deceive or
stupefy the workers that's something
lenin talks about explicitly but marx
was not talking about that
the passage opium of the masses
uh [Β __Β ]
i can't believe
i
is is that the critique of hegel's
philosophy of right
oh no is it the german ideology
um
i think it's the it's the critique of
the philosophy of right isn't it
los it's the introduction to the
critique of the philosophy of right
right
okay okay it's the critique of the
philosophy of right that's what i
thought initially
you have to understand that
marx was not making like some kind of
like political socio-political
commentary he was referencing the ways
in which religion
was becoming a relevant object of
philosophy at the time
uh
the scandalous conclusion of hegel was
splitting you know between the the young
hegelians and the right hegelians and
the young hegelians were going down the
path of a criticism of religion
marx by saying it's the opium of the
masses was not actually making the
argument that like oh religion is
deceiving workers from their true
interests
marx was saying that
all the illusory qualities of religion
in regards to the world
and the reason it's illusory for marx
he's coming from the perspective of
philosophy
is because in reality religion is a kind
of mythology it's it's wrong right we we
draw from the conclusion of the hegel
and the young hegelians and from german
philosophy marx says that the insight of
german philosophy is that man is the
highest essence for man so the question
is why do we still have this
form of estrangement
of man from himself in the form of
religious illusions right
and what mark says is that it's not
because of religion it's because our
world is warped in such a way
so as to make illusions necessary about
it he's saying
the form of religious estrangement and
alienation is a reflection of the
objective human alienation that is a
feature of our world itself
right so he's coming from the
perspective of philosophy he's not just
talking about organized religion he is
speaking about what he considered at the
time to be religion in general right yes
he was critiquing firebox criticism of
religion as idealist
precisely and the reason that leaves
room for ambiguity is because religion
was taken only in a purely philosophical
sense as a purely philosophical object
at the time the question of how religion
can feature into the insight of german
idealism that man was the highest
essence of man
of course the conclusion must
necessarily be atheist that religion is
false of course man is the highest
essence for man but that's only assuming
we consider religion strictly from the
perspective of philosophy the question
of the objective material significance
of religion
marx makes it leaves it ambiguous if
religion is
the heart of the heartless world and the
soul of soul's condition then religion
is interfacing with our humanity so to
speak with the essence of man
uh in ways
that
we have to be open to we can't just say
it's it's it's illusory right because we
have to what is the essence of man right
marx isn't claiming he knows that what
by what form do we relate to our own
essence as human beings right so that's
what i'm trying to say it's much much
more profound point than the like
standard kind of lefty view of like oh
organized religion is bad but i'm
spiritual or whatever right
so it's not what i'm talking about of
course marx was talking about religion
as such
he spit but that's he was doing it from
the perspective of philosophy the
practical consequences you can't say are
anti-religious i think
uh though plenty of you know plenty of
people on the left have been
historically kind of areas i think a
certain understanding has arrived that
between communism and this is the main
point forget about what marx said
philosophically in the present immediate
practical sense because that's hard to
grasp and very hard to understand matter
of fact if you don't have a background
in german idealism or the history of
western philosophy
please shut the [Β __Β ] up about what the
young mark said
for god's sake you're just going to
embarrass yourself and look like a
stupid [Β __Β ] if you don't have a
background in german idealism kant
shelling fikte
you know and then before then spinoza
and the rationalist if you don't have
like a background of a scholarly level
of understanding of these things please
just shut the [Β __Β ] up about the young
marks there's nothing from the young
marks that will ever be intelligible to
you if you don't get that
internationally in religion which allows
for a communism that has room for faith
not even have room for faith but it's
actually able to rediscover itself in
the history of uh the world's great
fates frederick angles uh marx is a
friend if you want to use uh toward the
end of his life he wrote about how in um
why does this stupid fat [Β __Β ] laugh
yeah i don't i don't know if a guy like
hake who doesn't really seem that
educated or his audience are aware of
who frederick angles is
was your undergrad in philosophy [Β __Β ] no
dude do you think i would entrust a
serious study of philosophy to the
[Β __Β ] university system just look at
university uh undergrad philosophy
students and look how stupid they are
the early stages of christianity you
found pretty much a very striking
parallel to the socialist and communist
movement in europe that the principles
and values of christianity um are
strikingly similar to those of the
communists i mean the president putin of
russia has pointed out that the uh the
code of communist builders which was the
soviet uh kind of like handbook for the
console youth uh he said all these
things are ready to be found in the
bible so around the world especially in
russia with this communist party and in
latin america and that's 1.25 and i hope
in the united states um communism has
not only been proven to be perfectly
compatible with faith but they appear to
even complement each other because uh
from the perspective of the world's
great questions we can see the kind of
corruption and decadence and inhumanity
uh the pakistan has brought upon the
people of the world and the way in which
this has to be yeah i think a really um
clear form of decadence is you vash i
look at you when i see decadence
you are actually an example of decadence
imagine if the sons
of any given society
had vosh as their model to look that is
[Β __Β ] decadence
gluttony is a form of decadence by the
way it actually is gluttony is a form of
decadence
to be addressed economically and
politically um
seems to be very much compatible and uh
similar to what the communists are
saying right now in regards to this
question of equality um i think there's
also confusion here too because never
wanted to make everyone absolutely equal
because sloth and gluttony absolutely
as marx angles and lenin point out
people are inherently different some
people have more skills than others some
people are smarter some people are
strong this isn't true in general so we
don't tommy's doing this is that
but i have citations and you don't you
don't you don't even know like that this
is coming from for example the critique
of the gotham program and the state and
revolution which lenin is citing the
critique of the gothic program like you
don't actually know about that right you
don't know about how
um
marks and angles in their letters
corresponding to one another talked
about this you don't know about how
angles in his letter to other people
mention the same point right
you wouldn't be able to like give
citations about what i'm actually
talking about i don't have this idea of
making everyone equal we just believe um
as far as equality is concerned no more
than what was written in um the
declaration of independence that we
believe uh that men and women were
created equal right which is what the
founding fathers of the united states
said and all that means that in so far
the government is going to serve the
interests of the people we're gonna have
a government okay hold on vouch he's so
educated he's gonna say no
that's
not really true
that's not really true
who else thinks it's not really true by
the way i want to know if there's anyone
here
thinks it's not really true
what if i told you
that angles actually made it explicit
that the entire association of communism
with equality
doesn't go any farther than bourgeois
formal equality
the reason communists are being
associated with equality
is because it comes from the bourgeoisie
engel's called equality a bourgeois
precept
the difference is that
most of europe at the time most of the
world at the time
had not yet undergone its bourgeois
revolutions
so communists were the ones taking up
the banner of equality
but it was something that came from the
the bourgeois liberal revolutions
actually
as far as uh communism is concerned it
doesn't go any farther than the formal
equality already inherent in the
bourgeois revolutions
formal equality formal equality it does
not extend the principle of formal
equality to the sphere of economics
that's the point
that's the entire point
now the reason communists are especially
insistent on these original values of
the bourgeois revolutions
it's precisely because communists view
the changes since then
as overgrowths on the bourgeois
revolutions monopoly capitalism
the union of the aristocracy with the
capitalist class that happened sometime
in the mid 19th century the compromise
that they arrived at between each other
um
you know
the rise of the banks and the rise of
the oligarchies and so on and so on all
of these things
basically may force the communists to be
defenders of
the principle of you know liberty and
this is what stalin said in his very
last speech he said it is up to you
communists if you want to win the
majority of your people and be the
patriots of your country to uphold the
banner of bourgeois freedoms because the
bourgeois governments are now trampling
upon them
so um the founding promise of the united
states is isn't really sort of a broader
doctrine of the left for a couple of
reasons okay
a broader doctrine of the left
what on earth does that [Β __Β ] mean
what on earth does that [Β __Β ] even
mean
um yes the founding document of the
united states is an integral part
of american communism
at least symbolically it represents the
bourgeois revolution the bouzou
revolution is a prerequisite to the
proletarian revolution
so yes
of course it does
the communist party
literally made it its goal to
defend the liberties and bill of rights
and things you know guaranteed by the
freedom of speech and all that [Β __Β ]
constitution
look there's a lot of discourse to be
had it's just formal equality formal
liberal equality
like the liberal notion of um
of human rights uh and the fact that no
human rights is a very recent invention
we're talking about
formal equality
formal equality it's very simple clearly
did not think that men and women were
created equal and you could also point
out that hake also doesn't think people
it doesn't actually matter what the
founding fathers personally believed
they wrote it on a piece of paper so
formally that's what they believed
formerly that's the foundation of the
institution of the republic formally and
that's what bourgeois quality is it's a
formal type of equality okay
to think that it's meaningless because
it's formal is just shows how little you
[Β __Β ]
know about history
marx and engels thought that the four
matters
were created equal in that respect
clearly because you know of his
political beliefs shut up about jack um
the the key distinction here is that
marx didn't really talk about equality
um he talked about um
he talked about what was enough fairness
freedom freedom thank you he talked
about freedom sorry like i said
he talked about freedom
i don't know what else to say to this
except citations
where did marx talk about freedom
actually if anything an emphasis on
freedom over equality would
is actually the notion of bourgeois
liberty it's it's liberty right
god knows what vaush means by freedom
here but
no
marx
marx didn't emphasize any of the three
precepts of you know the bourgeois
democracy liberty equality and
fraternity it's not like marx
was you know more on one no they're all
[Β __Β ]
they're all they're all the [Β __Β ] uh
ideological precepts of the bourgeoisie
maybe you could say marx talked about
he talked more about uh
the species being of like human beings
being able to realize
their own essence in reality
from the young marx maybe you can make
that case
i thought he was going to be smart when
i first saw this and i was like marx
more emphasized emancipation which is
true
um
marx and the social democrats that came
after him
used the rhetoric of emancipation and
they very often times com compared
the situation of the proletariat to like
the classical form of slavery
like spartacus was upheld as like a
proletarian hero it's this idea of
emancipation just tearing off the the
bonds and just
but emancipation is not the same as
freedom for example
freedom can mean you're able to make a
certain range of choices right but
emancipation means there is a very
immediate form of bondage that you want
to
break out of now what comes after you
know you don't know just like spartacus
you escape
what comes after wait who knows right
just escape first so it's emancipation
cognitive decline arc he talked about
freedom um the freedom for people to
live their lives absent any uh malicious
interference absent the control and
exploitation of their bosses um no he
didn't that's actually not i don't know
i think he start trying to refer to
marx's views on free association
but this is not what free association
means
um it's not about malicious intervention
or anything free association
you have to understand marx's humanism
to understand what that means but no it
doesn't mean
like i'm i'm free to be a fat lazy [Β __Β ]
and then no it's not what it means
marx and engels both believed
and they literally said this if you need
the necessary citations
that freedom and necessity are the same
there's a dialectic of freedom and
necessity freedom is nothing more than
insight into
necessity freedom is insight into
necessity that is the [Β __Β ] maximum of
marks and angles
um and and i think marks believe and i
think most of you you think you i've
please emphasize the think because
nowhere in marx are you gonna find any
substantiation of what you're saying
people in my community believe that such
an environment where people are free of
both in both the positive and negative
sense you're talking about bourgeois
liberty you're not talking about
emancipation
one where people would be more or less
equal now would everyone be exactly as
smart as everyone else would everyone
more or less equal no that's
what are you talking about be equally
capable of everybody no of course not
there would be huge goals and now that's
not even what what we're talking about
here it's not just that people would be
different like inherently
it's that
there would be different economic
outcomes
like for example and this is what marx
literally said about the lower stage of
socialism
people would be compensated differently
according to their abilities and so on
and so there would persist the
inequality right
later on there's no telling about
you know there's no telling that there
would be equality but there would be the
same more or less inequality bourgeois
inequality
but i think that you know for example
ceos being paid a thousand times as much
as their workers that [Β __Β ] would not be
happening in any system okay if you're
talking about like a hypothetical
communist society
a there would be no money um
i mean they're very clear about that
there would be no money no one would be
getting paid anything
and b
uh
that's a cultural prescription right
there's many cultural prescription
communist
states have taken up as like a
a cultural gesture of like a spirit of
equality but this is the same spirit of
bourgeois equality by the way more or
less but yes you know we're not going to
have this like monstrous level of
discrepancies in how people are getting
paid it's a spirit of fairness and
justice and so on but it's not the
essence of what socialism or communism
is you can have inequality and still be
a communist just not really culturally
but otherwise yes
people are free to act um
on their desires because only through
exploitation okay that that this is
that's where it gets weird right
what do you mean on their desires it's
like
okay hold on what
on their desires
people are free to act on their desires
i think he's he's confusing marx for uh
aleister crowley who said do as thou
wilt shall be the whole of the law
no that's not what free association
means whatsoever
free association for marx was referring
to a more organic form of social
intercourse
um
[Music]
as opposed to the forms of estrangement
that exists
in the form of the state right
the state is like a an absolute
universal line that imposes itself on
the whole of society now free
association is more like a kind of
bottom-up
way in which
social intercourse will happen
in no way does that have anything to do
with each individual just doing what
they want and realizing their individual
desires
all of the same sense of like limitation
of your desires and you know
following customs and rules and
traditions that would all persist
yeah
you know i think he's i think he's just
trying to shoehorn
his own pedo fantasies about acting upon
what we can infer to be at least one of
his desires in the past maybe he's
changed what we can discern from those
destiny logs is that he did express some
sort of desire
to have child sex robots in the future
it's just that he's trying to make that
compatible with marx for you know which
is obviously not true
could such gross inequality emerge so in
that case you know it's really about um
not so much equality but the equality
freedom could be get i mean by four and
other people it's not
what
is there much point debating someone
like hey who speaks entirely and
propagandist brainwashed no and this is
another one of the reasons why i don't
have as many debates these days i don't
find it fun to talk to people like yeah
because you're a fat [Β __Β ] you wouldn't
you wouldn't stand in a debate with me
you wouldn't last i mean i got can you
really imagine vosh holding his own in a
debate with me could you imagine him
holding his own in a debate with me like
just the sheer gap in knowledge
like between us both right
he could not he could not survive a
debate with me even a moderated debate
it'd be even worse if it was moderated
as a matter of fact like if i had a
chance to give my
to say what i gotta say
i mean he he tries to optically engineer
debates like
like an opponent will be saying
something completely and entirely
reasonable and this fat ass will just go
why are you laughing vox the bluff is
called what's so funny it's not
self-evident as if you think it is it's
not
you know
jf gary eppie stefan molyneux infrared
hake or any of these guys yeah it's the
gyno laugh anymore they're just very dim
this dude's very bad under pressure
that's the difference he's extremely
poor under pressure he does very very
poor under pressure
he does very poorly one moment
okay let's continue
and they don't think about any of the
stuff they say they have their talking
points they read them at you for a piece
of paper uh you can you can make
whatever dunks you want but they barely
even respond to them they just look at
you when have i ever read anything from
the only time i've ever read anything
from a piece of paper
was when i was know i was gonna be sleep
deprived because perspective philosophy
demanded i woke up
at a time that was unreasonable to me
to my sleep schedule so i woke up and i
the night before i prepared a note a
notepad
and i read off of it that's the only
time i've ever referenced the [Β __Β ]
any this dude that probably has notes i
don't even have notes i just go in
[Β __Β ] raw
you know
i don't know if voss could ever do
anything raw
because let's be honest if if there's
any woman that's willing to give herself
up the vosh
there's a very high chance she has an
std because
i mean valish probably has one but
you know they've probably been i mean if
you're gonna if you're willing to settle
for vows imagine what else you've been
willing to settle for right
so he can't go in raw like i go in but
you know because i actually get quality
you know what i mean
it's so weird when people try to insult
me like
let's compare who we can pull right i
don't even want to go to that territory
but we should compare that right all
your clout don't even make a difference
all your clout don't even make a
difference
you can't get what i get you know
pupils pointing in both directions um
you know what i mean it's low hanging
fruit and it's not even satisfying it's
like punching one of those it's like
punching one of those those those like
blow up clowns that just kind of like
bounce back this is an incredible
posturing from a guy who's
i've only ambushed you once since then
you've never ever like how how how how
have you ever prove have you ever proven
this
you've always been running away from me
since then
how am i the guy you're constantly
punching oh boy we just completely own
them the whole time how how
prove it
you're just saying things you can't back
up you're [Β __Β ] bluffing fat [Β __Β ]
back you know i would much rather talk
to people who actually seem to like
think about the things they believe
because at least then bosch is six two
he's not six two he's five eleven he's
six foot maximum he's not six two maybe
he's six foot
max maximum six foot don't give me that
he's six two type of [Β __Β ]
i have seen him next to destiny okay
destiny's
my height
he's not a head taller than that i've
seen him next destiny that's not six two
and
i've seen him next to destiny
thing is
at the time i don't know what destiny
looks like now but destiny was very slim
and skinny
so
he'd tower over me
i think i need to give you some
perspective here because walsh and
destiny
so i'm destiny's height if we believe
destiny right i'm destiny's height
and this is what they look like right
together
apparently this is 6-2 by the way and
remember i'm destiny's height
so
that's not six two okay
and that's not a head taller but
regardless
i am much wider than destiny that's the
that's the tragical part of this whole
thing is that i'm the same height as
destiny i'm just a lot thicker and wider
so imagine how i would look compared
next to vosh
you know what i mean
it's like does this really make all that
much of a difference
his forehead he only has a forehead over
me okay is this would his forehead
really make that much of a difference
he's a full head shorter than 6-0 at
least that's not true dude
that
there's no way
he's measured himself on stream
yeah vosh this is
so this is one two three four i don't
know i don't know one two three four
maybe he's four inches taller than this
so six foot i don't know i can't really
tell
i was thinking like my phone is six
inches right so you would have to put
this phone
on top of let me see let's see put this
phone on top
and that would have to be vols right
it'd be six inches so this is like a six
inch phone right so like this does that
look accurate that does not look
accurate to me
right boss would be like this
this one's taller
that doesn't look accurate you think
comparing to that is that accurate
this is all big
is that accurate
that don't look accurate to me
they don't look accurate this is like
the size of my head
you understand
this is like this would be like a head
taller you understand yeah i don't buy
it bruh i don't buy it
i don't buy that [Β __Β ]
or maybe i have the case on i have like
you know what i do have a case on let's
actually be fair
i'm no i'm going here we're actually
gonna do this
we're actually gonna do this
so let me get this on
let me get out of the case
okay so now we're gonna have a more fair
thing so
this phone
like this
right
so this we're looking at this remember
this is the reference photo we're
looking at
so like this right so it'd be like here
so if valsha62 you take this phone
is that look like that is this is this
is boss this much bigger than destiny
look
i don't think so bruh i don't it's like
it's not even it's not even okay there's
no way he's 6-2 there's no [Β __Β ]
mathematical way to do 6-2 he's got to
measure himself on stream or something
ain't no way to do this 6-2 no way and
if he's not
which i doubt he is what a stupid thing
to lie about you [Β __Β ] [Β __Β ]
and my phone's not the size of a
forehead bruh
511 i think he's around
511. i don't know why someone who's five
eleven would say they're six two
supposed to only like add
one and a one inch or something don't
add [Β __Β ]
who adds three inches
that's he added three inches bro
three inches
i get when someone adds an inch or
whatever
i can sympathize i round up
i'm only five eight point five i still
round up to five nine
but
three whole inches
three whole inches
what kind of fat [Β __Β ] insecure loser
does that
three full inches
you know if you catch them on a point
you can see them stumble a bit you know
i want them to suffer and bleed you
can't milk blood from a stone but if a
person really cares about what they're
saying like remember the tanky debate
that i had this was the joker tanky the
person who said that i would be selling
pencils in a year it's been about a year
now and
i'm the most powerful leftist on earth
you know what i mean like that guy when
i was talking to him i had fun dunking
on him but like there really wasn't much
going on
you know what i mean so so let me
explain to you the the argument right
let me explain to you the arc ross is
wider and taller he's fatter and yes
he's taller
i guarantee you next to me he would not
look good and he would not look bigger
he would not look bigger he wouldn't
look like the bigger man he would look
like a fat [Β __Β ] yes he would not look
like the bigger man but anyway
um
what valsha's trying to say here is that
i like debating nerds because nerds are
i can be passive aggressive with them he
likes the passive aggressiveness and
that's that's the whole basis of this
[Β __Β ] um
that's the [Β __Β ] basis of this entire
[Β __Β ] uh
debate bro blood sports [Β __Β ] they just
like seeing nerds get humiliated and i
sped i i did a speed run on that whole
thing right it only takes a guy like me
to just [Β __Β ] blow all these people
out the [Β __Β ] water i cracked the code
for why people like watching this [Β __Β ]
bosh and i'm literally
you're like marijuana i'm like [Β __Β ]
meth i'm like crystal meth and you're
[Β __Β ] marijuana people are [Β __Β ] i
have pure undistilled [Β __Β ]
dopamine i am pure undistilled [Β __Β ]
sarah whatever it is [Β __Β ] dopamine
i'm pure undistilled i'm the pure stuff
i'm that blue crystal from [Β __Β ]
breaking bad
i'm that blue crystal i [Β __Β ]
distilled the formula for why people
like this [Β __Β ]
you fat loser [Β __Β ] now you're just
sitting and coping wondering
finding people like me because i [Β __Β ]
crack the code dude the jig is up now
you're just a [Β __Β ] nerd all the
passive aggressiveness is gone because
i'm directly aggressive
it's not even necessarily that he's
dimwitted he might be you know perfectly
intelligent it's just there wasn't
really much actual discourse taking
place i would say something and then he
would say something and if there was a
relationship between those two periods
of saying something that was kind of
like a brief miracle
um
it's something that i'll try to work on
just at the moment it just feels a
little bit sad like i actually get sad
sometimes in those conversations because
i feel like i'm talking with an npc
um but i'll work on it i'll try to find
more people who actually give a [Β __Β ]
about what they believe you know we can
dunk on them we can dunk on them
astro clock tower the arguments there
are a bit beyond me i'll admit it i'm
going to privilege these special
interests like amazon and facebook other
monopolies over the ordinary yeah sorry
like rob noor and ctv you know like
stuff like that like how am i supposed
to engage with that i'm sorry i keep
interrupting but you can't supposed to
do to engage with that stuff you know
sometimes i feel like a lot of people
engage in these debates only for the k
forever you know is that how you
pronounce it the k fave kay fabi however
it's pronounced how can i talk to
conservatives when
how could i talk to someone who doesn't
who's not a [Β __Β ] uh stiff nerd i can
only talk to stiff nerds and those are
the people
i can't talk to someone who's a real man
i can't talk to real men i'm thinking
i'm used to being a [Β __Β ] slimy wheezy
little [Β __Β ]
i can't do that i'm a [Β __Β ] fat [Β __Β ]
how can i [Β __Β ] talk to someone
i can't talk to someone in a plane
smoking away without all this passive
aggressive [Β __Β ] nerd [Β __Β ]
you know i can only talk to someone who
okay i okay okay this is the person who
boss can talk to guys all right like i'm
in the know guys i'm in the know i've
i've read all the relevant data and i am
in the know i have the fluorides there
and listen i i'm at the end of the day
i'm completely reasonably normal and
listen i i can talk to bosh okay i can
really talk to bosh and i'm gonna you
know he's like that's the only [Β __Β ]
people he could talk to
right he can't talk to ctv he can't talk
to those kind of people because he's a
fat [Β __Β ] nothing else
that like the wrestling like similacrum
of violence and performance where like
they just have fun with the yelling like
the loud noises make them happy you know
like like they just kind of smile gotcha
they just kind of smile with the loud
noises you know so it doesn't actually
matter what i say
well we'll we'll we'll find a way we'll
find a way to work it out we will we
will man
and we will should be treated
accordingly people like pezos bill gates
uh and other billionaires are not gods
among men they're not somehow more human
than we are not somehow more citizens of
this republic than we are so in that
regard we just as far as equality is
concerned believe that everyone should
have a certain equality before the
government before the law that allows us
to begin with equal opportunity now we
don't we're not advocating for any
quality of outcomes in life if you look
at communist states like china you don't
find uh
quality of outcomes between people yet
countries like china have done it it's
so weird because when i was talking to
hawk i was like yeah it's like the last
person i'm thinking about is vosh as an
audience like with these dumb lefty
[Β __Β ] why the [Β __Β ] would i ever talk to
them but
yeah
when it's like hack when he heard that
he's like okay when his audience heard
that they're like ah okay when every
american on this [Β __Β ]
like 99 percent of americans are like
okay i get what you mean by communist
state vows you know what boss is
thinking
it's not even true no nowhere did marx
and engels even say that it's a
stateless classes they didn't even say
that they just said that as like the
ultimate consequence of the movement of
communism historically as the ultimate
cons consequence this will have for the
society the state will wither away
okay
this doesn't tell us about
of course there's such a thing as a
communist state i mean like from an
orthodox marxist strict classical
marxist perspective yes there can be a
communist state because for marx
communism is nothing more than the real
movement that sublights in the present
state of things there is no reason to
think
that
the disillusion of the state does not at
the same time correspond to the
strengthening of a state
this is the dialectical point that
stalin made right
if you are a country surrounded by other
countries
and they are making borders
the strengthening of your state which is
developing towards socialism and
communism
will be inversely proportional
to the uh
to the preservation of the state in the
long run right
so of course there can be a communist
state of course a communist state can
participate in the wider historical
movement
um that sublates the present state of
things that i mean the chinese state is
a perfect example it's a state that
constantly is undergoing
structural reforms and shake-ups and
changes it's a very dynamic even calling
it a state is no longer accurate anymore
right a state refers to like a static
thing right
and a very good job in being able to
crack down on monopolies like the ones
you're seeing with amazon and the
billionaire class china is actually an
example of a country with a government
that isn't able to be infiltrated by the
special interests the corporations and
with special private agendas that are
beyond the interests of the people so i
think we should be clear that communists
don't want to what a weird [Β __Β ]
what is up with this guy he like he
laughs
it's like it's all fake it's all
artificial it's so weird
there's not like every time he laughs
and smiles none of it is authentic none
of it is genuine i'm convinced like he's
like playing games with his audience
like he's like he's like programming
so weird
it's so [Β __Β ] weird what is up with
this guy
to uh completely level society and make
equal we just want people to be able to
have a fighting chance and that means
people don't land they don't want homes
we want people to have to be able to own
things because if people are able to own
things in general they have a solid
foundation from which to begin and begin
as equals
uh
are you an atheist
um my personal relationship to religion
i would say is complicated but uh in
regards i think i am an atheist in the
sense that i don't like making
assumptions about what god is and what
god wants and who god is but at the same
time i'm also someone who's motivated by
profound sense of faith and um faith
he's got those shifty eyes
who knows what maybe he's got a second
tab on his monitor he's looking at
something like who knows man who knows
god knows what he's looking at too you
know
god very god but again because religion
has been misused so often in history
my own relationships personally um where
are you from i'm just curious if you
don't mind oh yeah my parents are from
lebanon okay um this is a quote from
mark's the communist manifesto by marx
angles communism abolishes eternal
truths it abolishes all religion and all
morality look at the [Β __Β ]
weird glee that's on his side i'm sorry
maybe he's just ugly you guys think he's
just ugly
maybe that's it he's just an ugly [Β __Β ]
because it just really disgusts me
like looking at this dude this guy i get
a visceral sense of inner disgust when i
look at his changing [Β __Β ] facial
expressions
instead of constituting them on a new
basis it therefore acts in contradiction
to all past historical experience is
that root is it not atheistic
um i i wouldn't say so because i think
what marx and angels were trying to say
in that regard is that communism doesn't
mean to replace all these things which
is a great parent and a new dogma kind
of a new tradition and i think it's very
important to you know keep in mind
because uh it's very easy to just assume
that because you're having this new
political movement and phenomena that's
gonna somehow make a new religion and
make a new thing like that and also i
think there's often times a
mistranslation as far as the world
apologies concerned a lot of these texts
so oftentimes the word off hebong which
actually means ablate which means to
preserve while at the same time going
beyond is translated into abolish and
balance means like to wipe out right and
oftentimes marks in english yeah this is
one hundred thousand percent true i
don't i don't know how valis is gonna
weasel his way out of this being true
because it just [Β __Β ] is
right about the sublation of things uh
which is not necessarily incompatible
with their preservation and new form
right so the way i look at that the way
i would interpret that is that companies
don't want to abolish christianity they
just want to give a new ground for the
expression of the authentic christian
faith without the corrupt
religious institutions and
establishments which deceive the people
and trick people in the name of tapping
into their real authentic faith um what
you're seeing live right now is the
consequence of infra's brand of
communism for conservatives wink
yeah but do you address the content of
what i just said can you address the
content of what i said why am i a
conservative maybe the reason i'm a
conservative is because it's my view
that this is the most correct
interpretation of marx
can you can you challenge my
interpretation of what i just said
the dude brought up a quote where he
said the communists seek to do away with
all eternal truths and dogmas and this
and that that and what my interpretation
of that is that communists do not want
to
elevate communism to the status of an
eternal dogma and eternal truth right
um it doesn't want to say that in the
place of these religions we're gonna
have the communist religion or whatever
right so that's my interpretation
where uh where like every radical idea
like every radical social prescription
name one of these radical social
prescriptions because
if this is or if what you just heard was
a radical social prescription
from the communist manifesto
you didn't interpret it correctly let's
actually go over it and read it together
uh let me see communist manifesto of the
communist party here it is
uh
okay here we go
so here we go so they're confronting a
criticism of the communists
in this specific uh
it's even worse it's even worse than
what valsha's trying to say so boss was
trying to say that this is a radical
social prescription for marx and engels
right
well let's read it
he's quoting what they expect others to
say so undoubtedly it will be said
religious moral philosophical and
juridical ideas have been modified in
the course of historical development but
religion morality philosophy political
science and law survived this change
there are besides eternal truths such as
freedom justice that are common to all
states of society
but communism abolishes eternal truths
it abolishes all religion all morality
instead of constituting them on a new
basis and therefore acts in
contradiction to all past historical
experience that was the charge leveled
against the communists
so
what did
how did marx and angles respond
this accusation what does this
accusation reduce so to the history of
all past society is consistent in the
development of class antagonisms
antagonisms that therefore assume
different forms different epochs
but whatever form they have taken one
fact is common to all past stages the
exploitation of one part of society by
another no wonder that source
constitutes all the multiplicity in the
varieties of displays moves within
certain common forms general ideas okay
traditional politic
with radical rupture with traditional
ideas so this is this is the one here
right my interpretation of this is very
simple
that instead of this so-called abolition
of tradition
sorry abolition of religion
communism will not set
a new religion to replace uh communism
is not going to be a replacement to
religion morality
uh sorry where is it
religion morality eternal truths etc etc
that's that was my interpretation
now you could say my interpretation is
wrong
um to which i will respond
what did the experience of history show
us and that's the relevant point here
the most stupid thing about this entire
the relevant point being
in practice it turns out that there has
been a reconciliation between communism
and religion right
but the most stupid thing about this
whole thing is that i'm getting into the
weeds about philosophy and text and
things like that
when hakee is representing this average
christians in america who are terrified
about this idea that communists want to
come and destroy religion now vash is
calling it a radical social prescription
in reality it's a terrifying thought
that what people find as the heart of a
heartless world that communists are
going to come and take that away from
them that's not how you approach this
issue vosh as much as you're a fat
pervert who delights in the idea of
terrorizing christians and and and
upholding this [Β __Β ] radical thousand
credits like no dude
this is how people deal with their
[Β __Β ] reality
now if you want to get into the esoteric
weeds of marxism and debate about that
i'll be more than welcome to debate
about it with you right i do think it's
an open discussion more or less
and that my view is by no means
self-evident but i think my view is the
strongest right now i'd be willing to
debate that with you but when i'm
talking to a guy like hawk i'm not
getting into the [Β __Β ] weeds of
philosophy and all that kind of [Β __Β ] i'm
talking to a dumb [Β __Β ] random
you know conservative guy who i imagine
has sentiments that reflects masses and
masses of people
marks our angles would have made has to
be like reinterpreted in in such a way
as to not be threatening you know it's
like oh well well it actually does it
actually does because when marx and
engels were talking about this [Β __Β ]
usually they were dealing with the
context of intellectuals and philosophy
the actual practical implications were
much much more tame than the gravity
of like how rad like when they're
talking
in their critique of feuerbach and their
critique of hegel and swan like
that does not mean you immediately go
about with this like radical view
against religion and all that kind of
[Β __Β ] so when they're digging up things
out of context from the communist
manifesto
ignoring the context of those things and
they're interpreting that to mean oh my
god the communists are going to come and
destroy religion that does need to be
defused that absolutely needs to be
[Β __Β ] diffused
because it's taken out of context it
goes from an intellectual context to a
popular context well those are not the
same forms of context right
the method of enquiry
inquiry mark says is different from the
manner of presentation in the manner of
inquiry we have all sorts of radical
views about religion and so on and so on
but in terms of a manner of presentation
it's very dangerous to just
assume those are the same thing you
could be you could be meaning something
entirely different than what you intend
on saying
in practical reality
right
you know they didn't they didn't want to
abolish religion bro they were okay with
organized religion they just bro it was
they absolutely did not want to abolish
religion and no i mean in no practical
sense that they seek to abolish religion
now
critics of communism accused them of
seeking to abolish religion when they
sought for example
to relegate religion into a private a
matter of a private affair right and you
know separation of church and state and
removing these state power of churches
and and so on in the clergy
i guess they were more or less
indifferent to that charge because it
was a straw man to begin with but
in terms of like what the modern
standard for abolishing religion would
be and there's no trace of any advocacy
on the part of marx and engels for
abolishing religion absolutely not no
no i mean nowhere do they say that's
what they seek to do
specifically marx says the contrary like
religion is not the essential point
if there is something so wrong and
illusory and alienating about religion
so marx says
it's merely a result
of an alienating wrong
illusory society that is in need of
illusions
religion is there's no battleground of
religion that's relevant none
bro they were just like against like the
bad kinds
um no that's not the point that was
being made here
i think that for the most part marx was
was quite sympathetic to people with
religious beliefs i think that probably
yeah that's a stupid condescending view
that has nothing to do with the point
the best way of putting it right like he
didn't hate really no no it's not the
the more specific point is that this
we're going to get to later but mark's
only engaged with religion
from the perspective of philosophy he
never engaged with religion outside the
perspective of philosophy marx called
philosophy religion rendered and
expounded into thought turns out there's
more to religion than just thought and
philosophy it's a
it doesn't address the question of
aesthetics it doesn't address the
question of feeling it doesn't address
the question of affect it doesn't
address the question of the unconscious
right it only addresses religion insofar
as it is taken as a dogma of conscious
thought
aka philosophy so there's more to
religion than that
religious people he understood the
breath of life it gave
many what you call islam organized
religion yeah
right right
i think so
it's not like there's a pope of
prostitution but that's organized who
are just motivated by cynical interests
of serving those in power or serving
special interests or just plainly trying
to scam people and making money i've
seen reports that that china for example
as recently as last year they were
clamping down i think on christians as
well as some other religions like falun
gong or something like that and saying
we need marxism not religion not
christianity and i've just noticed that
uh for example armenians i've had some
armenian friends and they lived in a
former communist country and because of
that there's a lot of corruption and a
lot of cheating and low trust society
making
business practices with um with many
armenians because of that culture that
basically where
life is not done life is one's done in
america with a handshake you don't have
to worry about a man that you shook
hands with pulling a fast one on you so
the reason vos is such an idiot is he's
looking at this from the perspective
like
who is more logically and
argumentatively correct you know i could
tear this hey guy to shreds you guys
know i could is that my goal though what
do i gain from that my goal is to win
over his audience and actually present
his audience an example of what a
communist can be and what communists say
that's different from what they're
familiar with they're already used to
the idea of communists being a bunch of
monsters i want to show them a different
side to things right
it's like he he's such a smug fat dumb
[Β __Β ] this whole time he's approaching
from their perspective like has you're
not arguing dude that's not the point
obviously yes you could tell hake
something like uh what are you talking
about dude there's the the term snake
oil salesman literally comes from the
19th century and you had the carpet
baggers and yes it was always a sleazy
slimy society yeah i could say all of
those things and what would i what would
i in the process be doing i would be
proving that i am a guy who's more
knowledgeable and educated than hake is
well guess what
i guarantee you hake has has debated
many liberals who have already proven
that they're more educated and it
doesn't do them any [Β __Β ] good because
the reason people listen to hake is not
because they think he's more educated or
even that he's necessarily more
knowledgeable
um it's because what he says makes sense
to them you understand and you have to
address the root cause of why that is
i'm not interested in proving i'm
smarter and more knowledgeable than hake
i'm interested in proving
that communism is a sensible path to his
audience
something vos could not do by the way
thank you morlock appreciate you
case in one of these uh communist
countries because it seems to it seems
to be that communism does not understand
or ex or else it purposely exploits the
weakness and corruption and laziness of
human nature because
it has it has you
where you are you get something that you
didn't earn and you don't um you don't
appreciate it you don't properly take it
um
in china um what i never get what do you
mean what are we talking about
i i don't know what to say like i said
before vosh is a guy who only takes
things at face value he thinks
everything's a matter of propositional
logic and when you're saying something
and putting it out there
you're speaking in terms of like some
kind of common
you know
conceptual reasoning or something like
that and if there's no deeper
unconscious or intuitive web of
associations associated with what you're
saying there's no deeper meaning behind
the surface it's not like he's like
you know
picking bells that make sense to a lot
of people
when he says [Β __Β ] like this
and also voss really doesn't know how
we disagree on a lot of things but you
are spot on w key issues like esoteric
political analysis thank you sebastian
another thing vosh i noticed what's
really immature about him for a guy
who's been on the internet for so long
is like he just finds some things
unfathomable like
how could you say that how could well
dude clearly a lot of people believe
stupid [Β __Β ] things
most of this country believes stupid can
you not have patience who cares
just look past it like why does it
matter
i'm gonna treat hake like a beverly
hills intellectual
no dude that's not how it works you get
a move on with it get over the fact that
not everyone's that educated or
knowledgeable in this country
when you're talking to normal people you
have to get to the meat and potatoes of
what makes sense to them and what's
meaningful to them right you're gonna
have to get over the fact that they're
not that knowledgeable or educated right
because it's not what matters what
matters is
what they're actually trying to say
and the practical implications and i
think from this perspective in a way i'm
more american than valsha's i'm more
pragmatic i'm focusing on like what are
the practical meat and potato what does
it mean practically who cares about this
dumb [Β __Β ] whatever intellectual stuff
like what does it actually mean in in
reality meat and potatoes whereas vosh
has adopted this kind of like british
you know romantical kind of aesthetic
of basically like smugly elevating
himself over the world
practical meaning
i know nothing of practice my pink
beverly hills hands do not concern with
practice i am concerned with status
with status
what is the truth what is your status
and authority
and it's like i'm gonna i'm a [Β __Β ]
red-blooded american i'm not a beverly
hills badass like valsh i'm a
red-blooded [Β __Β ] american i'm
focusing on practice
you know
christians are not being cracked on
china for their religious faith now
there are various cults how
knowledgeable is this person how
reputable how credible are they
who gives a [Β __Β ] dude
it's like
i'm more like the the channel five guy
where i just have my microphone and here
say whatever the [Β __Β ] you want i don't
care it doesn't matter right well she's
more like sasha bear cohen where he's
like actively mocking and looking down
on people right and that's not my style
i don't give a [Β __Β ] you know what i mean
i'm more like the channel five guy it's
like
yeah i say what you want dude who who
cares they don't mean nothing anyway
they don't matter anyway you know
among them the following which is called
it's not really a historical traditional
religion wait
i'm pretty sure china absolutely cracks
down a religious expression
yeah you're just as sure as this hot guy
is here you heard some rumors in hearsay
and you think it's true it's not coming
from a perspective of actual education
on
the chinese state's relationship to
organized religion
i'm pretty sure that happens doesn't am
i wrong on that i'm pretty positive
you're just as positive as hawk you're
you're literally no different from this
dumb [Β __Β ] random guy
you're actually worse because hawk is
like doesn't even pretend to be educated
i doubt hawk is even he's probably
barely literate he probably can't even
read
vaj is
a guy who's become very educated to give
expression to what a dumb fat [Β __Β ] he is
i mean vosh's education has given form
to his sloth his gluttony and his
stupidity
and nothing more
that definitely absolutely first of all
we have you know muslims in the xinjiang
province and then like like yeah
yeah you can't even be a fanboy
you have muslims in the xinjiang
province and you also have the largest
muslim group in china which is the hui
muslims who don't seem to be going
through a lot of problems
the media doesn't even be seem to be
saying there's anything wrong so no
one's alleging anything going on with
them but apparently it's about religion
and not
not turkic nationalism or or you go to
separatism it's religion sure
tv in uh in china imagine
but it goes beyond that too like i think
even you know not holistically but often
like they they'll crack down on
christianity and stuff like that wait
did he just say they don't let fem boys
on tv
so
wouldn't religious people be in favor of
not letting them on tv
i don't get it
he's like they even banned fem boys from
tv
and is is that like an extreme example
of anti-religious crackdown
you stupid fat ass at least do this
right
um the falun gong are like a weird super
weird religious gold so i at least do
this the right way you know at least do
this the right way it's like it's not
really that hard either
hold any water for them
um chinese government will crack down on
those but not simply because of in the
name of uploading marxism versus
religious chinese society you have to
keep in mind has historically not had
the same relationship to religion that
other societies do the chinese society
has um been mostly secular throughout
its thousands of years of history just
in the sense that this way of relating
to spirituality what
why don't you wait until i say just in
the sense that like in what sense do i
mean that i clarify
you dumbass i know it's not secular in
the modern sense
it was obviously very spiritual
intertwined with confucianism and
buddhism and taoism
but it had a radically different
relationship to religion than the
monotheistic abrahamic religions and
even the
dharmic religions that were flourishing
to the south right so what i was saying
was hundred percent true
and religion all those kinds of things
are done through the concrete bonds of
civil society and states so that's not
really yeah that's that's fundamentally
true like for example the rights of
worship and ritual
were just
integrated into the totality of the
state
historically in china like the way in
which people relate to the relay express
their religiosity is through
the form of the state
right religion no longer becomes an
autonomous form of effectual
personal belief
it's directly expressed in the way in
which you're relating
uh
as an individual to your civil society
it's woven into the fabric
of civil society in the state
you're not going to have missionaries of
the chinese religion
travel to other countries
it's just china it's all through china
the relationship to religion is entirely
different
what
what
it's true it's [Β __Β ] true i don't i
don't see how you could it's it's like
how is this not true
it's not religion because it's done
through civil society and statehood what
i didn't say it's not religion i said
they don't have the same relationship to
religion what we call religion is just
directly woven into their
into the form of the state
it doesn't have a quality of like
autonomous worship
there are exa like mass autonomous
worship just chinese society has never
been particularly religious where
everyone is visiting the equivalent to
like sites of worship
like a mosque or a church and and
there's just like there's no autonomy of
religion right
yes chinese philosophy legalist
philosophy is fundamentally like ethical
it's ethically based right i mean how do
you not know about chinese legalism
right
yeah it's it's worldly it's oriented
toward the world right it's oh it's been
that way for a very long time
even taoism taoism right it's not like a
religion in a sense comparable to the
abrahamic religions like christianity
like the one that's actually [Β __Β ]
under discussion that hakee brought up
you fat dumb ass
does he know what the catholic church is
what
what
what
that's the example of the opposite
the catholic church was not the same
thing as the monarchies of the middle
ages
the catholic church what are you talking
about the vatican or something
what the the catholic church is not a
state unless you're talking about the
vatican it's also not a civilization
you're trying to compare china to the
catholic church the catholic church is
precisely the example of like an
autonomous religious purely religious
institution
that looks like that is like has like
tentacles in the webs of all these
governments in the you know in the
middle ages in the past and it's all
it's sight of all this intrigue and it's
completely autonomous it sends
missionaries around the world
it's like completely ephemeral and
intangible
the catholic church is an example of
spirituality
purely being given expression in the
worldly institutions of the state no
it's not it's the exact opposite of that
the catholic church is an example of a
religious institution so fundamentally
estranged
from the worldly institutions of the
state
it is literally a separate institution
called the catholic church the catholic
church is not the same thing as the
monarchy as much as the monarchies were
be and the empires were beholden to the
catholic church
they were not identical they were
separate institutions
what the [Β __Β ] are you talking about
what does that even mean
an innovation confidence it's just been
true for chinese
it means you have to have a minimal
understanding of chinese history and
legalist history i don't know what what
else to tell you you're just a fat
ignorant [Β __Β ]
three um otherwise christians are free
to practice their faith openly and
freely within china and um events like
the taiping rebellion in the 19th
century was a christian religious
uprising against the ching dynasty was
obviously very influential uh this is
the way that i was making inroads with
devout christian believers
to make china
more familiar to them and to to create
bridges right bridges
where they don't see china as this
[Β __Β ] monstrous alien force that
there's connections right
[Music]
what a crime
what a crime and valshe isn't even
paying attention to what i'm doing
strategically or rhetorically he's just
like focus he's taking everything at
face value what a dumb f stupid [Β __Β ]
in
you know influencing the communists the
eventual economies and when they become
later so um i think there's an
interesting relationship to christianity
but against china is not a christian
country now in regards to this cynicism
that prevails in armenia you have to
keep in mind that after the collapse of
communism when the very same forces that
conservatives within america are trying
to struggle against um basically engage
in the wholesale privatization of the
former soviet countries and you know
pretty much eluded them and destroyed
their traditions and trying to destroy
your culture and set up all these ngos
and things like that to promote the
to promote a society that was more in
line and
it means the same people who are behind
the color revolutions against communism
are also the ones
that are
um
promoting non-traditional values in
these countries it's very simple point
it's such a very simple point and it's
literally true
it is literally true
i'm looking at friend requests i know i
got some friend requests
so sick of stupid people just request
why do you want to be my friend why do
you [Β __Β ] i have 120 friend requests i
can't even tell when like
it's somewhat important
you just [Β __Β ] hit request why because
you're [Β __Β ] bored
don't just [Β __Β ] request these send a
friend request to me i don't even know
like why why do you think i have time to
talk to you i don't
more within the interest of the american
deep state um why obviously the
situation in the most common states has
been catastrophic but this wasn't the
fault of communists it actually what do
you do you think zurich is genuine about
flat earth yes
i do i don't think he's faking it
he's being serious
actually was a fault of the same um
global billionaires and the global
capitalist class who were funding ngop
like george soros people like uh
george soros and the rockefellers oh you
are playing to the audience right now my
god
okay
god wants to debate you about why you
are wrong about larouche
i don't have any strong views on
larouche i think you want to debate
pesto mine
not me you want to debate pesto not me
i'm not i don't die on the hill of the
rouge i like larouche i think he's
intelligent and very knowledgeable but
i'm not a dog i'm not like a larussian
myself
okay so it's not really the hill i die
on and second of all
that's pesto mime right and that's other
people in our community but what was i
saying
yeah i mean
how many of you guys think that george
soros is just a right-wing meme
and that the open society foundation
doesn't doesn't actually pour like
billions of dollars into social causes
around the world
how many of you guys think it's just a
right-wing meme you guys actually think
that it's just a meme
by the way i'm building bridges so they
already know about george soros i know
about him too
so i'm building bridges guys
we're we're not identified with those
people we're not identified with the
establishment we're not identified with
a deep state we're not identified with
the agenda of american imperialism so
but the fat ass is laughing a job with a
hut you can't help laugh right
[Music]
guys the bosch laughed isn't this
crystal like spot on
ugly [Β __Β ]
what what an effective way of getting a
nazi to agree with what you're saying
dude holy [Β __Β ] uh
a nazi
what
why
wasn't george soros a nazi collaborator
he was a he was a nazi collaborator
actually so
what do you mean a nazi
where is that coming from uh what's
what's representative of modern uh
neoliberal capitalism you know oh yes
rockefeller and soros
wait hold on do you think the
rockefellers aren't a thing anymore
wait you think the rockefellers aren't a
thing anymore
just because they're not in the media
anymore
does he think the rockefellers aren't
relevant
anymore
and they're not like you you think elon
musk and like these these celebrities
are are what represent modern capitalism
dude
the rockefellers are a thing still
what's next the oil industry is not a
thing because it's not
it's not in the media that much
this dude doesn't even know who the
[Β __Β ] ruling class is
he talks about the ruling class he
doesn't even know who the [Β __Β ] ruling
class
is jesus christ
they don't only have an agenda for the
people of the united states and for this
country which i think too many americans
have been revealed they had an agenda to
completely overthrow the communist
states and replace them with liberal
democracies and that has been an
absolute disaster for traditions and for
culture and foreign
yeah it has like for example traditional
families
you can't have traditional families when
your [Β __Β ] economy becomes devastated
when your daughter gets sold into
prostitution or worse is trafficked off
into other countries
yeah that's what happened with the
glorious rise of liberal democracy
the [Β __Β ]
russia you find the communist party to
be you have mcdonald's and american
corporate
culture
overtake the traditional forms of
culture that existed before
so yes that did happen vosh
what is so funny fundamentally uh
orthodox christian at its core it's
allied with the orthodox like like when
you see this when you see me juxtaposed
to him doesn't he look so stupid
how does he even get away with it like
doesn't he know i'm gonna react to this
and make you look like a stupid [Β __Β ]
don't he looks so stupid and
embarrassing like
how do you get away with this [Β __Β ] i
don't get it like you look dumb dude you
look [Β __Β ] stupid because both
recognize the forces of anti-communism
to be a minister religion within their
country so um to me regarding the
promotion of laziness and selflessness i
think i have to keep in mind that in the
20th century you had this kind of
economic equality within communist
states primarily because they were
coming from a backwards agrarian society
and transitioning to industrial society
so the goal is just to give people the
minimum of just some kind of
modernization now when that came into a
crisis communist states responded to
that in different ways but the most
successful way of communicating with
honesty is that the path china took and
obviously no one's really making the
argument in china these vices of you
know a lack of economic entrepreneurship
and innovation and
[Music]
uh things like that is being promoted
china's very that's true
hey wash not every time someone
disagrees with you
is that grounds for mockery because you
have to prove why it's wrong first and
that's something
look your audience per capita is not as
educated as mine but even i go out
to to make the effort to like
reason my position now when you say
stupid [Β __Β ] like
you know like that guy we had on sale
communism means the equal distribution
of resources my audience is educated
enough
to know that's stupid and they'll they
will laugh at it
but your your audience is not nearly as
educated as mine so the burden of
of of actually like
reasoning why i'm wrong still remains
upon you you can't just like
bluff that it's self-evident i don't
know he does it intentionally i think he
you know vasha's talked about like
everything to him as optics so he
manipulates his audience by like
waving these gestures and like fake
laughing and [Β __Β ] to be like guys this
is wrong this is
i can't explain to you why it's wrong
thank you dictator appreciate it he's
like i can't explain to you why it's
wrong but trust me
trust me
trust me it's so stupid trust me why
dude explain like
i see dudes in this chat a lot
more often than you'd expect
obviously the most are npcs so they're
going to own mega lol because they're
because they're you know the streamers
omega loading so it must be funny but
then i always see the odd guy be like
wait but how is he wrong right
you know what i mean because they don't
know why it's wrong
he doesn't explain
you could actually make the argument
that china uncannily has almost exactly
the same economic conditions as a
capitalist country uh if you really
think about it it is it is true it is
remarkably easy to defend uh
so
hard work a sense of entrepreneurship
and
competitiveness are exclusively
features of a capitalist economy
and there's nothing there by the way
there's no other distinct it's like well
the chinese government owns all the land
oh no it doesn't matter that doesn't
matter right that has nothing to do with
it
to defend china to it's exactly the same
as a capitalist country because of the
vague fact that and by the way
the funny thing is is that who said that
it's inherently capitalist to be
entrepreneurial
and hard-working and competitive
america is not really a very
hard-working country compared to the
rest of the world neither is europe
to a capitalist when everything in china
is capable capitalist wait hold on
just to be clear
is capitalism an ideology or is it a
mode of production because
if hakee believes in capitalism
my best guess is that he's associating
it with a certain you know certain
qualities
that make sense to most people and that
are familiar to most people and that
most people would be terrified of of
being gone
i'm a capitalist because i want free
markets we all want free markets right
the question is how do you address that
you can't address that but you have to
focus again on the practical
implications do you just let things be
and let these corporations do whatever
they want well then you're not going to
have any [Β __Β ] free markets right
there's nothing inherently capitalist
about that it's just that they reject
the democrat form of socialism which you
take to a max right
um to a capitalist
this is the result of someone who sees
everything from the perspective of
ideology
the dogma of being pro-capitalism is not
why hawk and his audience are gonna say
they're pro-capitalism they're gonna say
they're pro-capitalism because they're
being spoon-fed lies about what
socialism and communism is and you're
reinforcing those lies yourself you
stupid [Β __Β ]
happens
it does make it quite a bit easier
god industry is hard working innovative
competitive uh society and this is no
longer cheating
and lying and cheating i don't know if
that's well i i'm not sure i think
that's a culture of lying and cheating
is common to all you know market
societies or societies that are part of
the global capitalist world economy
right so uh that's not something that's
the fault of communism i think that's
more something that's the fault of the
kind of doggy dog world that we like
like i can't listen to this uh hey okay
dude well china's just like all other
market societies you can't blame this on
the communism that china has it's like
that in all market societies what am i
listening to what am i what do they do
i'll make it very simple for you you can
have a communist society
that is still part of the global
financial system in the global market
that doesn't mean that
uh china is capitalist
although i mean in what sense do you
mean that do you mean that it's
capitalist solely in the sense that it
participates in the global market sure
you can call it capitalist i'm not going
to be anal about words but when we say
china is socialist and when the chinese
government calls itself socialist and
when chinese people describe it as
socialist or communist
we also intend to mean that there's
something distinct about it it's not
just that right so it just depends on
what you mean but when you're someone
like valsh
who is incapable of deriving the deeper
meaning behind words
um you have to be very anal about you
how you use words right it's like
you can't both call something capitalist
in one sense and then in another sense
call it socialist you can't in one sense
call something socialist in another
sense called communist everything must
be one sense right
but um
the fact that china is still being
on the global market
means that
as far as exchange value is concerned
the chinese commodity will exchange for
other commodities
but what defines socialism is what's
going on internally to china right
and that's where socialism becomes
relevant
um
it's really as simple as that it doesn't
mean china is going to be immune from
all the evils and defects of capitalist
societies
it means that so far as the chinese
government is concerned and the specific
chinese economic system within china is
concerned we can describe it as
socialist
it's really not that hard to grasp
but china has seen profound cultural
shifts and specifically with the
president's presidency of xi jinping
we're seeing more of a promotion of
morality instead of the kind of
unfettered economic growth for the sake
of economic growth is more promotional
moral values and kind of uh cracking
down on this kind of cynical doggy dog
uh society doggy dog the uh just a side
note you mentioned china so and you said
we you talk about we communists and you
distance yourself from soros and all
four foundations right i think of them
as communists you mentioned xi jinping
is that is that the only communist
public figure oh it's so ugly and
disgusting when he shakes his [Β __Β ]
man titties when he laughs like this it
is actually like
physically revolting when i see boss do
that
it's like i i almost wish vosh just
never covered me i hate doing this i
hate looking at this fat ugly [Β __Β ]
it's so disgusting i'm absolutely so
[Β __Β ] disgusted every time i see him
shake his body it is actually sickening
physically sickening
it's like i can smell it too you know
it's i'm not even joking it is actually
disgusting person it's just a literal
disgusting [Β __Β ] person
no there are several within latin
america there's people like pedro
castillo there's the leader of the
russian communist party uh there's other
communists throughout eastern europe uh
leaders of communist parties we have
common states like vietnam laos cuba and
then also venezuela under the presidency
of both chavez and nicolas maduro so
there's many uh people i would consider
socialist for communist um anybody in
america
um it's a tricky question within america
because i think that
he's i saw this part specifically he's
gonna start soying out he's this is the
soy get ready for incoming soy there has
been a big confusion
soy incoming right he's gonna he's gonna
squeal like a piggy
watch this is the history of the cold
war in the left right division the fat
pig is going to squeal like a pig watch
leftists within america and liberals
have adopted the communist identity not
because they have any connection to
communism no actually no
i don't know why voss thinks i have him
in mind i don't
and matter of fact the only times i ever
address you on stream
is when you orbit me and you do this
kind of [Β __Β ] right i i never have you in
mind as like i said i'm gonna reiterate
this i've said it before
false is not a representative of
american left
american leftists hate bausch walsh is
hated by them all they all [Β __Β ] hate
him he is
he is he is he is may as well be a right
winger right now right
because like i said bread tube has died
and they're all moving to ml now right
um
boss you're not you're not an american
leftist anymore you're not you're not
welcome like if you go to any dsa
chapter and ask these people hey
what do you guys think about vosh
they'll be like
i hate this [Β __Β ] guy you know so they
hate him
what up ctv
um
they all hate him
and obviously they hate me too but the
difference between me and vosh
is that i haven't burned bridges to
everyone outside of the left so i'm
having a dialogue with
them that's the only difference is that
vash is now isolated right
because he calls everyone a nazi but on
the other hand like all leftists hate
him too they all hate him now right
so
let's continue totally because i just
want to kind of spike to the right wing
similar to how people adopt the identity
of satanism what does that mean without
any connection to it globally what is
that
it means it's something you completely
pulled out of your [Β __Β ] ass
and you just larped and had nothing to
do with the actual historical examples
overseas it means you started calling
yourselves communists and le socialists
and all this kind of [Β __Β ] because you
wanted to rebel against your
conservative parents and you had no
[Β __Β ] connection to what those
actually were overseas that's what it
[Β __Β ] means
communism isn't an ethnicity you don't
need to have a [Β __Β ] lineage it's an
ideology what does that mean
what
despite christians but within the united
states we have figures socialists were
left-wing figures that i was considered
to be more aligned with the global
companies
what does that have to do with there's
no such thing as traditions unless it's
an ethnicity what the [Β __Β ] are you
talking about like jimmy dore people
like jesse
uh that's the soy incoming i was warning
you about
so he actually physically squealed
he actually squealed
um
let's play that back actually
let's actually play that back
similar to people adopt the identity of
satanism what does that mean
without any connection to it globally
what is that
communism isn't an ethnicity you don't
need to have a [Β __Β ] lineage in it
it's an ideology what does that
mean christians but within the united
states we have figures socialists or
left-wing figures that i would consider
to be more aligned with the global
companies yeah so i said they're more
aligned with the global communist
movement
which is true jimmy dore is
like he's an ardent anti-imperialist
which is like the probably the most
decisive and important
facet of being aligned with the global
communist movement
as it exists you know
i feel like jimmy dore people like jesse
eventually
there you go
and he actually sort out it's a soy
overload
oh god it's so gross like physically
revolting like this
this the sound effects are really
disgusting you i heard like his fat
flaps like
slapping on themselves did you guys do
you hear this [Β __Β ]
it's actually disgusting it's actually
sickening
it's actually sickening
jesus [Β __Β ] christ
oh i'm glad i didn't i'm not even
meaning i it's actually [Β __Β ]
disgusting
oh my god can i do i how long does this
part last because i don't gotta [Β __Β ]
mute this part it's actually disgusting
jimmy dore doesn't even call himself a
socialist he's
why is he shaking
so is the litmus test to being more
aligned with the global communist
movement what you call yourself
or is it
where you are positioned
in your own country's politics because i
don't give a [Β __Β ] damn what jimmy
warren calls himself i care about where
he positioned himself relative to the
american people in relative to american
politics
it's not about what you call yourself
you can call yourself whatever the [Β __Β ]
you want
it doesn't matter you you call yourself
a communist vows
how many communists agree that you're a
communist around the world did [Β __Β ]
laugh at you dude
oh yeah oh it's my bad it's your twitter
bio you're right
it's actually about your twitter bio
it's pro capitalism i guess so is haas
so that's not really surprising like a
quick quick
name
um
what does that mean being pro-capitalism
what does that mean right
that's why i'm an american and he's more
british an american cares about meat and
potatoes what does it mean in practice
that's what i care about
vosh
cares about a whole bunch of [Β __Β ]
that doesn't [Β __Β ] matter right
you're a capitalist you label yourself
this way you label yourself that way
what does it [Β __Β ] mean
what is the [Β __Β ] practical result
what is it what does that actually mean
in reality right
surely there's a reality beyond the
[Β __Β ] label
the top top three american communists go
uh uh jimmy dore uh okay jimmy uh glenn
greenwald uh uh michael tracy uh donald
trump no too far no donald trump donald
trump jr like unironically let me go on
record saying this unironically
trump is more of a communist than vosh
unironically i'm saying that
because remember there was a lot of
different types of communists and
socialists read the communist manifesto
they named like eight different types
that they could
discern there was feudal ones and there
was conservative christian reaction or
whatever there was a whole bunch of type
of communist and socialists
at the time they wrote that so
unironically i i do think trump he had a
very working class
um
oriented movement
which was about
you know changing the economy to
serve the common social interests of the
american
worker or whatever so it was a kind of
type of communism socialism
if you really want to you know stretch
it
and be loose about the word
but certainly more than whatever vows
false is just
absolutely beverly hills
bourgeois elitist to the core right
there's nothing nothing communist about
a guy like vosh
it was working class but only for a
certain demographic
i don't know about that there are a lot
of pro-trump latinos
and it's not just like a token thing
there's a lot of them
a whole lot
like a lot
a huge amount actually like i don't even
know why it's not talked about but it's
a really big thing
and i'm not just talking about cubans in
miami like in texas and
there's there's a lot there's a lot
a lot of latinos were for trump that
people realized even in mexico yeah
because guess what
um not a lot of people know this
all catholics
catholics mostly prefer trump because
trump is more catholic as a president
right
lots of puerto ricans to florida after
the last hurricanes yeah but trump he's
very his aesthetic is catholic he's very
like bright and colorful and warm and
human and you know he's like he's like a
he's like a pope right
or whatever right so all catholics
mostly prefer trump now even though
biden himself is catholic he's very
stiff he's very stiff and cold and
catholics don't like that right
so italians in new jersey and whatever
you're gonna find more
more catholic people will like trump
then uh
then biden regardless of the religious
affiliation of biden and trump
[Β __Β ] jesus christ absolutely beyond
parrot took across it yeah tucker
carlson
sure figurehead figures like uh caleb
who is himself devout christian at the
same time yes
okay
what is so funny about this i don't get
it
like you know michael karenti and this
is a new and growing movement which you
know it's it's it's actually so creepy
like the ease with which he like changed
he switches emotions like
one moment he's like screaming and
squealing and then he just shuts it off
it's like
[Music]
there's nothing authentic about it
there's absolutely nothing authentic
about his reactions here whatsoever
which i think in the future is going to
be much much larger than it is now but
for now unfortunately the american left
is dominated um by the vouchers
subservient to the billionaire class and
to what we would consider the forces no
not by vows dude like i said you're not
that relevant the only reason you're
getting covered right now
is because you covered me thank you lynx
like you notice guys i don't ever cover
valsha's debates or you're not relevant
dude
i consider luna oy a bigger threat than
you you know luna oy
and those fake mls to me those are like
you're nothing you're already done
you're you're not even like
no one cares about you anymore right
everyone thinks you're a dumb [Β __Β ]
everyone hates you everyone hates you
dude
you have a like a community of people on
twitch that like you no one else does no
one else
of uh american capitalism you know um i
think of communism as exploiting the
natural fissures between society i've
heard that they for example race in
america they divide the races they
divide again worker from worker from
boss or whatever so-called rich from
so-called poor when men from women just
the lgbtiq madness um i don't see you
and i mentioned this at the beginning i
don't see you and the infrared people as
being so
viciously anti-white so anti-explicitly
anti-christian anyway
um
how are you
ctv
you're a threat but
not yet like i'm i have to win
i have to fight the other lefties first
right
it's like then then we will have our
final showdown
one day by the way why didn't you why
were you on the showdown friday we
really missed you
um
yeah
how are you gonna get your how are you
gonna get an invite oh [Β __Β ]
i do well going forward in the future
i'll i'll personally invite you next
time every time but going forward in the
future you're always welcome always
welcome like you're like a vip guest
like we we desperately need and also ctv
let me tell you something
i'm trying to get more conservative
voices on the showdown every time i do
the showdown
it's like an echo chamber of lefties
right
and i want i kind of want it to be like
half and half right
i want it to be half and half i want
half conservatives half lefties right
and
yeah we definitely need more more
writing so if you know people who are
interested or anything also invite them
to because
bringing people on right wing guests are
much more valuable to me than lefting
with everyone's left wing on twitch
right everyone everyone in the sphere is
[Β __Β ] lefty there's very few
conservative voices that haven't been
de-platformed yet
become reasonable well i think you just
have to look at the name so communism
that comes from this common root of
common it's about finding what is in
common and that's why for me as
americans
what is this weird like is he is he
denying the root word of what where
communism is from
all right yeah i think people walsh and
his chat need to be educated so let's go
etymology of communism
it's the first thing on google
ready
guys get ready to laugh
[Laughter]
french commune which translates the
common in english
so that is actually where the word is
from
i don't know if you didn't know that
why do you think it's called socialism
it's called so the root word is social
right
the reason for that is because both
socialism and communism
thought that there was like a common
economic
or
common social economic substance
that should be the object of this new
movement this new conversation or
whatever that like our common social
economic substantive reality
has been deprived we've lost it and we
have to reacquire it somehow right
that's where communism comes from
like
words like common good common wealth
right these are all
related
common general yeah it's like
i mean
i did people not know this
do people yeah the comments right it's
like very
much and i think it's it's rhetorically
very effective when i'm dealing with
people like hake it's like
what comes to our mind when we think of
the word communism right
a lot of people tend to think communes
which is shitty right no one wants to
think of communes when you think of
common it's like okay that makes the
word more familiar it makes it make more
sense
it's about the common it's about the
common good the common object right
the common good yeah this common good of
our and
like vaush may laugh at that
but if you if you're versed in marx's
humanist philosophy or his humanist
anti-philosophy as i like to call it
that's literally the point marx makes
it's about arriving at our common human
essence
which takes determinate form across
society culture history whatever but
that's what it's about that is what
communism is a common human essence
man is the highest essence of man
sorry highest essence for man
so it is about this this comment right
because mark's man is not just one
individual
man i'm actually just like i'm actually
[Β __Β ] like almost directly quoting
marx right now man is not just an atomic
individual
man is the world of man
man is the social relations of man
that's literally a direct quote from
marx man is not just a isolated
individual he is the world of man direct
quote from marx by the way
actually uh communism was named uh the
root word is common because marx felt
that after he invented
what
marx
marx has nothing to do with the
origination of the word communism
marx thought the phenomena of communism
was significant
in ways that he interpreted from the
perspective of his humanist philosophy
but as a phenomena communism preceded
marx
um and yes the root word is common
because it was meant to address this
common
social ill or this this common loss
in society
this common object that they wanted to
build of society at least right
but yes the the root word is common is
this up for dispute communism it would
soon be all over the world you know he
said so i see people in his chat in in
all caps it's commune but it's a google
shirt search away from realizing you're
wrong it's actually common it's not
commune
it's common
tom you and you imbecile
how should i feel about this
how should i feel about like a thousands
of people
being wrong and i'm actually right
doesn't this put me in like an awkward
look how should i feel about this what
do i say you're what do i like what is
this isn't this like ominous a little
bit like
i'm probably going to surpass bosch by a
lot and if this is like a really bad
sign for vaush
like isn't this a little embarrassing
like guys i'm actually right i'm not
supposed to be right i'm the bad guy
right i'm the dumb guy that you're all
laughing at and making fun of
but i'm actually right
so hot like how am i supposed to feel
about that right
you guys guys i want you to know this
this is not a matter of tribal
affiliation it's not a matter of who
you're loyal to
like i'm actually right about this
what does that is i'm actually right
do you guys realize you're in the chat
of a streamer who's right
there may be less of us
there may be less of you
but i guess you're the chosen people
because
you are like the
elevated enlightened ones
like i'm actually right it's not it's
like a google search away that i'm right
right
how does that make you feel it's it's
like it's crazy
that doesn't that show there's so much
potential here like how easy it is to
make these people look [Β __Β ] stupid
who knows
we'll call this communism because soon
it will be in every country every state
will become
what
if we're going to be honest we're going
to promote communism we're going to try
and promote what is in common between
the people we don't want to divide
people or accelerate or promote these
currents
i think that's extremely rhetorically
effective to say if communism is about
the comments and what's in common
obviously we don't want to be a source
of division we want to unite the country
we want to have this deeper unity of the
people
um
i don't get what's so crazy about that
or what's so worthy of mockery about
that
okay right now he's saying racism is a
frivolous cultural division again this
is what i mean by right wing okay it's
like he's
am i saying racism is a frivolous
cultural division
or am i saying that there are a lot of
frivolous cultural divisions
that are promoted in the name of
opposing racism
he's very communist because he's
pro-china like this whole debate about
the 1619 project
the most communist state uh and and now
systemic racism is is being relegated to
uh meaningless culture so vos don't get
your panties in a bunch because no one's
talking about systemic racism
i'm operating under the principle of
good faith
new stuff there's a new cpusa video
we'll watch it tomorrow
where i'm not assuming that hawk isn't a
complete monster i'm i'm assuming that
you know there are a lot of stupid
things that people are getting divided
over in this country
and i do find them stupid
that has nothing to do with whether they
those divisions don't adequately address
the reality of any systemic racism so
what what is this like purity testing
you know what you know what this is
he's being like tank
he's screaming about the fact that i'm
denying the labor aristocracy when it's
like
it's just this weird way leftist like
litmus test or they purity test you
you deny the sacral truth you deny the
forbidden truth
you deny the forbidden truth of settler
colonialism you deny the evil it's like
it's weird like protestant thing where
it's like
i don't [Β __Β ] know it's like you deny
the world of total depravity and the
fact that we are totally fallen with sin
you deny it
you can't admit we live in a world of
systemic racism you choose to believe in
the mythologies
of the american
government
and white supremacy
you deny the truth of systemic racism
dude the like talking about systemic
racism
is not impressive to a guy like me i
mean
i've been in this for 10 years okay it's
it's not some scandalous insight
what if
what if this country is racist to the
core
oh my god
like dude
you know like that's not impressive to
me it's like it's not yes this is a
racist country and
moving on
what do you do about it you will he i
tell you what you don't do about it you
don't
focus on frivolous stupid divisions and
ex you don't you don't you don't you
don't accelerate the [Β __Β ] division is
what you don't do right
systemic racism isn't really a moral
problem
if it's a systemic issue then you have
to treat it in a systemic way you can't
moralize it
well guess what these frivolous cultural
divisions in this country they're just
moral [Β __Β ] games
they don't lead to any real practical
outcomes that address the reality they
pretend to be about
troll divisions this is what i mean
he is a conservative first owned by the
media to distract people from the real
enemies we want the american people to
come together to be reconciled with one
another so as they can focus through
what a horrible message attention on
their real enemy which is the current
american establishment the current
billionaire class the current oligarchy
and the current monopolies especially in
particular of the big tech monopolies
whose power is so unprecedented that if
allowed to continue isn't america in the
top five least racist countries when
paul i was gonna say that
europe is so much more [Β __Β ] racist
than america is holy [Β __Β ]
europe is way more [Β __Β ] racist than
the usa are you kidding
way more dude
way more
holy [Β __Β ] it's so much more racist
it's not even a [Β __Β ] question how
much more racist europe is
are you kidding dude
you're americans are pretty tolerant
okay
americans are pretty [Β __Β ] tolerant
you know i'm from dearborn michigan they
have a big ass [Β __Β ] mosque there huge
mosque
you know it's like i don't know if you
could have that in [Β __Β ] france
you know
did the stream crash
i don't know the [Β __Β ]
they may very well lead to the
destruction of our republic and of any
semblance of democracy unaccountable big
tech companies which are seemingly above
the law and don't have to answer to
anyone it weren't even being regulated
in any capacity so we want people to
come together we don't want to keep
dividing people along these lines it's
not the same time we can't recognize
that there are racial tensions
i like how
uh i i like how he was like um you know
we we need to we need to stop focusing
on petty cultural divides like racism
and focus on what really matters which
is big tech destroying the country
what
yeah
like yeah
it is that is that sound unreasonable
that we should stop focusing on
petty cultural divisions and
focus on
the growing power of big tech is the
growing power of big tech not important
what angle are you coming at this from
is the growing power of big tech not
somehow concerning
is he like a silicon valley operative or
something it's like what is this it's
like oh guys don't that these people who
have an agenda to fundamentally
transform america
but big tech is not a a a serious
topic of concern
it's like
not even the new york times would agree
with you vos even the new york times
would say
that the the big tech is a big problem
and a big cons concert you know what i
mean like
what angle are you coming at this from i
don't get it i really don't get it
in this country um there is a historical
and ongoing and i in my view and justice
committed against america's black people
because uh they have been denied the
post civil war uh rights of 40 acres of
new york right that's not you know some
kind of total economic equalization it's
just the minimum
foundation with which to build their own
community and i think that's the last
thing they need sorry
i think that's the last thing and sorry
to interrupt but yeah they've been
they've been given and given and given
it's been debilitating i don't think
they have i don't i'm not speaking so
much of a handout to make them dependent
on the us government which i think the
democrats have played a part in trying
to
secure them as an electorate but i'm
speaking he's also trending on twitter
yeah he's promoted by these silicon
valley guys hundred percent some kind of
fundamental just ability to own
something communist speaking to a nazi i
feel like racism exists and we should
probably do reparations nazis like uh i
don't think they deserve any more we've
given those people enough no no i'm not
talking about like a handout or anything
sir
okay first of all
um hakee is not a nazi right he's a
racist obviously and he's he's got a lot
of backward weird views he's not a nazi
okay he's not a let's you don't need to
be a nazi to have hawks view so we we
have our own uh nazism here whatever we
have our own history of the
you know the south and the kkk and
i thought that you know if we have our
own thing going we don't you don't need
to talk about the german
you know
that's yeah you don't need we have our
own thing right so let's get that out of
the [Β __Β ] way that's he's not a
[Β __Β ] nazi right
he maybe he's a bigot he's a racist okay
but he's not a nazi okay
uh
second of all
the idea that i'm like
it's like oh and
has surprises being so
um nice to this guy yeah because i'm
trying to find common ground i'm trying
as hard as i can
to find common ground with this guy
right
and the reason i'm trying to find common
ground with him is because i want to
present his audience with a new
perspective on what it means to be a
communist
i could just tear him to shreds
what good would that do
what what would that what purpose would
that serve except jacking myself off
looking at the comments in his channel
and modern day debates i saw a lot of
people who were open-minded and now
interested in communism they're
interested who's this house guy he's
interesting i want to hear more from him
right
well that's what i'm after now
i'm not talking about handouts when i'm
talking about 40 acres in a mule by the
way
americans don't like handouts
americans believe you have to work for
what you have it's it's fundamentally
instilled in in their character and
their temperament so when
they hear this word of like oh it's just
a bunch of handouts they get scared
right we don't want to associate
communism and socialism with handouts
and the welfare and all that [Β __Β ] we
don't want those welfare food stamps and
handouts are not things i want to get
rid of or attack but we don't want to
make people think communism is food
stamps and welfare and that stuff
because food stamps welfare and handouts
are federal government policies in
response to poverty so you are making an
association between communism and
poverty when you associate communism
with government handouts it's actually
that simple
and that's something i don't want people
to do i want people to associate
communism with
economic flourishing
so that's why i'm going to say things
like having land a baseline is is the
beginning not the end it's the beginning
of having an opportunity to participate
on the in the economy and produce wealth
it's the beginning not the end right
this is christ mark's would be rolling
in his graves if he saw his loudest
advocates talking this way with the
literal ideological antithesis to
communism
no no no not like a handout they
wouldn't be like welfare queens or
anything we you know just like
ownership
from which they can build economics
that's not that doesn't take the form of
just you know being dependent on the
government being dependent on welfare
actually if you look at the history of
the united states this ability for
americans to go and get their own land
was the foundation of american
prosperity and economic prosperity oh
what did this fat ass say i didn't even
see
what do you say
antithesis to communism
no no no not like a handout
why do you
someone can someone tell me why he keeps
talking about marx what is
like why do you talk about marks like
you know anything about marx you don't
as far as you're concerned vox is just
an old guy with a beard that you just
project everything you consider true and
wise upon but marx wasn't the guy you
think he was okay
second of all
is this an esoteric theoretical
discussion
or is this a political
discussion that's meant for mass
audiences if you think it's the former
i'm not surprised because you confuse
your stupid meaningless debates with
serious intellectual inquiry which is
why you lack the level of theoretical
sophistication
and theoretical knowledge to back up
anything you say in the first place i
have receipts vosh i did the serious
theoretical inquiry for a decade before
i went [Β __Β ] live
you went live first started running your
mouth and then went to wikipedia to try
and find ways of justifying the things
you say
you think there's a connection with i
don't [Β __Β ] know dude i don't [Β __Β ]
know i have no idea
they wouldn't be like welfare queens or
anything we you know just like uh
ownership
from which they can build economics
that's not that doesn't take the form of
just you know being dependent on the
government or being dependent on welfare
actually if you look at the history of
the united states this ability for
americans to go and get their own land
was the foundation of american
prosperity
you had the um affirmative specific name
of the acts and the 800 americans who
were westward to be able to just pretty
much the homestead act yeah these things
were integral and for the prosperity and
the economic first united states people
were able to have their own land and
from there they could proceed and build
something and then later you had the
population the farmers alliance were
struggling to have some kind of land
reform and break up monopolies and you
know have a government be able to
regulate electricity and uh things like
this
let me talk let me say the next step
the capitalism has made that harder for
people to afford things i think blacks
just as much as anybody have the ability
to to gain wealth in this country but
that ability definitely is limited
because of the subsidization of
subsidizing so-called education and the
corruption of education what has made
people and the subsidizing of housing
and the minimum wage those of all those
along with what you said have made
things harder for normal people to get
along they have two they have men and
women working you know you know how
vasa's community is always like you know
has this masculine posturing is because
he's insecure
okay
so what do you call your lefting
left-wing neuroticism if not insecurity
you're you're unable to just look past
[Β __Β ] people say and get to the point
because you're ideologically insecure
you're actually scared you might be
tempted by what hack is saying if you
don't like completely push back on it
who cares it doesn't it don't matter
it don't really matter
up to a point it matters but like meat
and potatoes it don't matter
which has only made people
able to afford okay so this is what i
mean like like voss is the type of guy
who will get mad that he called it kami
capitalism focus on what he means who
cares what he called it right he means
something we can all see he means the
big corporate monopoly capitalism okay
that's what he means it don't matter
there were people in my subreddit after
i was on with hake on that that like
panel show uh with dylan there were
people saying like you should get a
debate with hake i ask you like what
would i what would i do like what would
i even say with hake
um i don't know you would convince right
wingers that their preconceived view of
what
socialists and communists are is wrong
but i don't think you want to do that i
think you just want to confirm those
views
so you have no business debating him
head called you a sub in vosh
washes chat
compared to vosh compared to who what i
don't know if i'm a sub i'd hate to see
what a dom looks like
like like what would what would even
take place debate what his his his
synaptic responses should i like jangle
some keys and like get involve him in
that he's still man
who who like i said like i said before
who's getting their last laugh who's
actually laughing right
i think this dude is laughing
the [Β __Β ] up [Β __Β ]
like what do i say you know
make fun of him for two hours i'd be
bored after five there's only so much
you can say
real takedowns like really really funny
takedowns are
yeah vosh
because you don't actually know you
don't you even you don't know how to
participate in a conversation
you don't know where meaning is right
you think it's at the surface level of
like propositional logic or whatever
it's not
uh
yeah
is shu dating vosh by the way i never
knew that is she actually dating him
because if she is yikes
mega yikes like
ill you know
are ones where there's enough like back
and forth and interplay like rgr okay
like rgr i thought was a really fun
takedown because rgr riley isn't stupid
she's just a bit [Β __Β ] insane uh on
that particular on that on that
particular subject uh it seems um
and uh and she was actually engaging
with what i was saying her emotional
involvement was meaningful like with
hank i might as well just like i might
as well just find like an ai text
generator that that has fed a bunch of
nazi algorithms to itself you know like
a bunch of nazi text posts in the
algorithm and then just like debate that
like i'll say like hey you know
why is he going so hard with a nazi
angle because he's not a [Β __Β ] nazi
he's really not a nazi i don't know why
he's so going so focused why is he
obsessed with nazis i don't get it
i don't i think socialism would be good
you don't need to be a nazi to be a
[Β __Β ] racist in america okay
you don't need to be a nazi to you know
why do you have to be a german nazi why
do you have to be a member of the german
national socialist
german workers party
you don't have to
he thinks antonin scalia was a fascist
what
this that the other and then it would
say like blacks give too much welfare
queen degenerate and then i would be
like well i don't know you know i know
hank is not a nazi because nazis in the
u.s
are one of two things they're skinheads
they're part of skinhead crime the world
of crime they're somehow involved with
the criminal underworld right
there's a white nationalist criminal
underworld
connected to prisons prison gangs
and they they adopt a swastika as
symbols white gangs right
then there's intellectuals
to me
like i could see i don't even know if he
is keith woods i could see him being a
nazi right they're going to be more like
keith woods they're going to be more
like
both you know
nerds
intellectuals
that's the only thing that's going to
like
lead you to just abstract so
intensely from your local context
and start identifying with the german
nazis like why no no person just wakes
up on the wrong side of the bed and
becomes a [Β __Β ] nazi but you could
easily wake up on the wrong side of the
bed in the context of america and be a
guy who has
backwards views on race because we have
our own [Β __Β ] history about that right
so you don't have to be a [Β __Β ] nazi
you think that see here's the issue with
that framing i don't actually think that
morally there's anything wrong with
behavior as long as it doesn't hurt
other people and then it'd be like uh ju
soros jews sora and i'd be like well no
i don't quite feel that like sound like
what
what am i doing jesus christ what am i
doing here [Β __Β ] i didn't i didn't get a
bachelor's degree for this nobody
anybody with a ged anyone who's past
elementary school okay would run out of
things to say i feel
any level of education basic literacy in
the english language entitles you to
better conversations than that
what
how long do you think the basis was the
last wash
then they just raise the prices and so
men and women feel like they don't
really have to but they feel like they
always have to work both of them and
then they're separated from their
children it's a it's a corrupting
influence has it has not been just one
quick question i know adding things on
top has it not been the case that
communists exploited the divisions and
modernization and all that stuff uh in
order to create a crisis and take power
um no so i think i'll just answer it in
order just two things the first thing is
that i do agree that there are current
monopoly
here here goes trying to find common
ground with people on the other side of
the aisle what a horrible crime
except i haven't written off 50 of
americans as irredeemable
uh pieces of [Β __Β ] and subhuman you know
people like you have
so why is that surprising
but the fact that he's first making it
about hawk and not hawks audience yeah
hawk
is a weirdo he's a weirdo because he
thrives off of polarization so obviously
he has a vested interest in taking a
very extreme
unreasonable position
i'm a guy who puts hawk out of business
imagine if hawk with the whole debate
without doing anything outrageous
he would have looked terrible
so he had to die on the hill of
defending slavery
just to
sustain his polar his position of
polarization
right
to uh flourish economically but i don't
i don't know if i agree that those
things are necessarily the minimum wage
and the subsidization of housing
education those being enamored and all
the bureaucratic red tape and corruption
that they are definitely do need to be
improved and made more efficient i agree
but in general i think the number one
obstacle is actually the big monopolies
whether in the form of um you know in
housing you fat [Β __Β ] vows nothing would
be easier than tearing a guy to shreds
that the entire left agrees should be
torn to shreds it's much harder to be
patient
and convince people from the opposite
political
ideological status as you
that
there can be common ground
that's what happens when you're a
materialist who thinks that material
interests and not ideas are the [Β __Β ]
uh essence of why people have the
positions they do you have financial
institutions like blackrock they're
buying up america's homes um and madison
which you call economy capitalism i
think i would call it and this is
something that people refer to in
america a kind of socialism for the rich
imagine calling yourself a theory purist
imagine
i've never called myself a theory purist
all i've ever said was that i was more
knowledgeable about theory and vows
and when that knowledge comes with the
recognition
that
marx angles and lenin were never anal
about their use of the word socialism
they didn't they were very loose about
how they used that word
you know marx call lenin called the post
office socialistic and organization
i can show you
lenin post office socialism
i can show you directly right
so here you go
a witty german social democrat of the
70s of the last century called the
postal service an example of the
socialist economic system
this is very true
at the present the postal service is a
busy
so
you know
they were not anal about how they used
the word
they were not anal but can i take a [Β __Β ]
go take a [Β __Β ] dude
i probably will have to continue this
into tomorrow
holy [Β __Β ] because this lasts like two or
two hours longer right it's super
[Β __Β ] long
so i'll probably have to continue it
into tomorrow
but we're gonna compile this into one
video right
let's continue so they were not anal
about how to use this word and
it's actually literally accurate because
my i came onto streaming
with the radical thesis that we already
live in socialism
like that's the first thing i said on
youtube
when i started streaming
it's the first thing we said in our
[Β __Β ] videos like watch our video the
meaning of socialism in 2021. we do
already live in a type of socials in the
fundamental mode of production
we are transitioning into it's actually
just socialism socialism did win
when marx and engel said socialism was
inevitable they were right it is
it's just that our political
superstructure
has not
awakened to that fact but yes we
profit is not what drives our economy
anymore
later on he bets that you won't finish
because of your ego what's been [Β __Β ]
six hours like two of which have been
spent debating guys nearing 2 a.m so
we'll continue for as long as we can
i've been calling other people red lips
and ever using that terminology oh my
god
yeah 10 years off what is being a rad
lib do you even know what a [Β __Β ] rad
lib means you dumb ass what does being a
rad lib have to do with the expression
socialism for the rich it's a very
common populist expression i don't know
what's so rad live about it what the
[Β __Β ] is rad lib about that expression
you're just muddying words was stalin a
rad lib well a mario bordega said so so
maybe you're coming from the border
angle that
you know but
you're
then we don't mean the same thing by rad
lib if that's what you mean right if you
mean like
upholding the original principles of
whatever we could have
we don't mean the same if rad lib means
a jacobin populist
you know
sans kulo
type of you know [Β __Β ] yankee whatever
yankee doodle guy
we don't then what i mean by rad lib is
a [Β __Β ] professional managerial
you know woke scold piece of [Β __Β ]
[Β __Β ] lib [Β __Β ] democrat snowflake
[Β __Β ] so we mean radically different
things when we're talking about that
life just like that instantly closer to
death hold on i need to i can't i need i
need to wash my face just listen just
just
i think you need to wash a whole lot
more to be honest it tells us a free
market capitalist society but clearly
you have all these special grants and
favors the government does for the one
percent and for the monopolies right it
gives them subsidies corporations tax
breaks and subsidies the average
american doesn't have access there's tax
loopholes that allow special interests
to be able to gain the system and
basically rate the system so i do agree
we do have a kind of socialism for the
rich all i'm advocating for as a is that
we have a socialism for the people um
instead and to me now the second thing
about um
is highlighting the difference
communists haven't tried to create
crisis in order to seize power they were
rather the ones that seized power as a
result of crisis that no one else was
able to overcome for example in china
you had the um invasion by the japan the
japanese and communists have a very
important part in the war of liberation
and leading the chinese people against
uh the japanese imperialists and the
communists were the most effective and
being able to rally the chinese people
and unify actually the chinese people
rather than divide them uh to create
people's republic it's not really the
economies that are dividing people it
was their enemies that we're promoting
um various divisions between them in
order for the ruling class of the time
to be able to maintain its great power
so again this just his face is just
is anyone born this way just the soy
[Β __Β ]
hey thank god i'm not there yet i don't
know will streaming turn me into this
i'm good now but like
you know this like type of face where
it's like this
goes like this
you never want that
he he brags about him losing his weight
i i don't think he
what
maybe he lost weight after taking a [Β __Β ]
what else what other weight did he lose
again i think the primary goal of
communist is to unify people but when we
unify people you're gonna see the
establishment um the mainstream media
the special interests uh the
institutions the ngos the things all
these kinds of uh universities they're
all going to rally together and try to
stop it so conflict will never be
generated
because it's what we want what do you
think of trump tucker well here's what
i'll say about trump i'm obviously not
the biggest fan of trump i think that he
made many mistakes i think the primary
mistake that trump ended up making was
that he was completely beholden to the
republican establishment and i don't
think trump really had any independent
direction i mean the media was like
what's wrong with the phrase socialism
for the rich there's nothing wrong with
using it it's like a catchy way of
appealing to people but people like
infrared larp is the most insufferable
theory purists
when when have i larped as a theory
purist i really don't talk about theory
all that often in a combative way i only
talk about theory when you are trying to
consult some kind of authority and i say
leave marx out of it because you don't
[Β __Β ] know anything about marx if you
want to stick to this rhetoric let's
just stick to that i prefer that anyway
we don't want to get into the weeds of
theory and philosophy because it's way
out of your [Β __Β ] ball game so i've
larped as a theory purist how right
because you've said because you've tried
to consult the authority of theory and
you've been wrong about it then don't
consult theory just rely on people's
common sense and intuitions don't bring
theory where it doesn't [Β __Β ] belong
that doesn't make me a [Β __Β ] theory
purist
it makes me a guy who checks
[Β __Β ] ass posers fat [Β __Β ] posers like
you who try to
weaponize the authority of theory you
have no [Β __Β ] grasp or knowledge of
it's that simple when have i larped as a
theory purist never
i've just like why do you have to invoke
marx he's he died 150 years ago do you
need to invoke the authority of his name
to justify your position why
well if you're going to do that i'm
going to scrutinize the way in which
you're evoking his authority and i'm
going to hold it to a standard of truth
to just make me a theory purist i'm not
the one who wants to [Β __Β ]
hide behind the skirt of authorities in
the first place you are and you're
misusing those authorities
if you're the kind of person who will
call others rad libs for pointing out
that marks didn't completely disbelieve
in electoralism or pointing out that
like you know
when have i ever critiqued electoralism
i've never even used the phrase
electoralism at all i don't think i
don't think i've ever even used that
phrase
look this idea that i'm i come at this
from the perspective of like you know
i don't know austin redguard type of
person where it's like electoralism
bourgeois electoralism no i'm a very
reasonable guy right
to me
it's not that i'm against electoralism
i'm against electoralism for the
democrats i do believe in
a third party i do believe in a popular
front i'm not some kind of ultra leftist
he thinks you're like all the twitter
mls
that's like anarchist right i do believe
in participating and politically and
stuff i just
don't think that that you know look at
how i argue with destiny when i argue
with destiny do i bring up the you know
electoralism and bourgeois electoralism
no i talk about
just try to be as reasonable as possible
when it comes to this
right
it's not it's not on the in the name of
theoretical purity that i've adopted
this position
oh my what a stupid fat ass what a
stupid fat [Β __Β ] he's he's he's he's
trying to say that my positions are
because of some dogmatic theory
no
i share the same object as that theory
right which is here and now in the
present tense the correct position here
and now in the present tense
is not premised by theory or ideology
theory is just a way to clarify theory
clarifies where the working class is
where the objective material interest
when it clarifies these things it
doesn't premise them you don't premise
your political action on the basis of
theoretical dogmas and prescriptions you
use them to clarify
the correct ones that's why i talk about
people like jimmy dore which you
yourself pointed out
doesn't even call himself a socialist so
why do i endow so much significance to
jimmy dore well do the [Β __Β ] math you
[Β __Β ] idiot
uh
so stupid it's because my marxist
lender's theory leads me to p to
recognizing people like jimmy dore
represent an authentic
anti-establishment populist
sentiment
china isn't like a communist state or
whatever like if you like the issue is
that like
infrared doesn't like bernie sanders
these people talk about bernie sanders i
don't like bernie sanders
now
i liked him in 2016 and even in 2020 but
he [Β __Β ] up
he [Β __Β ] up he didn't [Β __Β ] up because
he's an electoral liberal social
democrat i don't give a rat's ass about
that
speaking in terms of his relationship to
the political establishment that's what
i'm focusing on i'm not we're not
speaking the same [Β __Β ] language here
we're really not speaking the same
[Β __Β ] language it's not about he's i
hate bernie because he's not a communist
no i don't care about that
i care about where he stood stands
position where his position stands
you know there's an objective reality of
politics beyond ideology it's not just
ideology i don't
it's not about ideology
like
he's a sellout he's sold out
there was something going on with bernie
was it marxist leninist communism it was
much more ambiguous than that but there
was something and he [Β __Β ] dropped the
ball and he sold out
that's that's that's been my only
[Β __Β ] position
the choice isn't ultra leftism and
[Β __Β ]
lipshit bernie supporter in 2021.
it's a rad live masquerading and
cheaping the name of socialism so for
them to go ahead and use the most libby
[Β __Β ] phrase imagine wait cheapening
the name of socialism
cheapen what
is socialism a sacred word
is it just a sacred word
but i don't know what cheapens the name
of socialism more
aligning the word socialism
with the ruling class which is what you
do
or
making it more familiar if anything the
problem with the word socialism and
communism
is that they're too expensive in america
right
they should be cheapened
people should be more comfortable using
these words
if these are expensive words then
there's going to be a lot of
fear associated with them and a lot of
anxiety and a lot of distrust and
panic and we already had two red scares
in this country we're kind of having a
third one now
and you're promoting it right no
communism shouldn't be
seen as something so alien and
unfathomable we want to make it as
familiar as possible to people is the
goal if you actually want to win people
socialism for the rich to describe the
basic subsidization and tax incentive
programs that any capitalist state will
use to privilege its bourgeois like it's
just it's such
a bourgeoisie
i bet you if i quizzed bosch on what is
the bourgeoisie what is the historical
origins of the use of this word
he wouldn't be able to answer
he would say something like they're the
owners of the means of production
no
that's
again
i said this before when i was debating
that other guy about the principles of
communism the definitions marx and
engels gave were for their time because
they made associations that made sense
for their time bouzouzi was a specific
class it was it doesn't just refer to
like
anyone who's
owns means of production besides
individuals really don't own the means
of production anymore
even when they do they don't even own it
individual in an individual way like you
own the majority of shares in a company
individually
because you own the majority of the
shares not because the company's in your
name
individually right
but
you call it socialism for the rich
because the fundamental political
relationship to the economy
that makes it social and socialized is
already here it's just rigged in favor
of the rich
it's not just about subsidies and all
that other [Β __Β ] you're talking about
it's much more than that
our economy is planned with from the
federal reserve it's things like that
and yes it's every major economy on
earth
because classical capitalism doesn't
exist anymore in any
country it's an old
relic of the past
such a rad libby thing to say even i
don't use terminology like that because
why is it [Β __Β ] radlib you stupid fat
[Β __Β ] it's incredibly reductive and
stupid um
yep congr vosh i don't think you know
what radlib means you are a liberal you
are fundamentally a liberal right
and you don't use this word
socialism for the rich
because you posture is like a special
snowflake type of liberal and you're
very anal about the use of words
so that makes you the opposite
of like a popular populist socialist it
makes you a [Β __Β ] gatekeeping liberal
that's actually why you're a liberal in
the first place
it's because you're being a gatekeeping
[Β __Β ]
even
she's so fundamentally [Β __Β ] confused
he's so fundamentally [Β __Β ] confused
about this
even i
even i don't talk about even i don't use
the word salsa of course you [Β __Β ]
don't
you don't have a [Β __Β ]
non-liberal notion of social so of
course you [Β __Β ] don't
socialism isn't about how like moderate
you are to normal people's sentiments
that's not the dividing line between
being a liberal and a [Β __Β ] socialist
even i won't do that you won't [Β __Β ]
do it
and that somehow makes you look good
here
what what angle are you coming at this
from
it's such like a radley thing to say
okay so what you've done is gate kept
yourself from liberals
but in practice you're like the hyper
vanguard of the liberal like in meat and
potatoes wise
you're no different than them but you
just decided to consider yourself more
special so why should i care
even i won't be sheep in the name of
socialism because socialism is your cope
for the [Β __Β ] failure of the democrats
thank you trista tv appreciate you
i'm so [Β __Β ] tired now and i don't
want socialism to be associated with
like
subsidies like that's not socialism
that the point is not to associate
socialism with subsidies
the point is to associate socialism with
heavy-handed political intervention in
the economy
and to make that not a scary thing to
americans it's basically to tell them we
already [Β __Β ] have it
so let's have it for the people right
that's a very popular reasonable
position
when you say we already have it to the
american people
instead of like this
like i know you're a sick perverted [Β __Β ]
boss and you delight and leap with this
idea that like
all aspects of life there's going to be
a great you're going to restructure
everything and everything will be swept
away and the whole ground from which
people stand will be wiped and every
beverly hills socialist will
listen most people find that terrifying
okay
most people find it terrifying
because then it's a question of trust
who is going to do this how are they
going to [Β __Β ] do it it's like it's a
question of trust how's where's zurka is
he not live
no way he's not live
it's been like three days i don't know
um
i'll dm him or so i'll check up on i
don't know
should i
i haven't heard from him in a long time
let me see
it's kind of weird
hold up
i don't know maybe he's taking a break
or something
i think he said he got partnered so i
think he's like doing more shows and i
don't know i have no idea
yeah i haven't when's the last time i
heard from him let me see let me check
this
um
so last time i heard from him was
when [Β __Β ]
the third
it was the night it was actually the
second at night
so the second at night
was the last i heard from him
what
it's been that long hold on
the second was
thursday
oh
wait today's saturday [Β __Β ]
thursday night
i last heard from him
oh he tweeted okay he's fine i don't
know what you guys talking about
okay
what what a better term would be welfare
state for the rich welfare state for the
rich austerity for the poor that would
be a better thing to say because we do
have that
this fat ass doesn't know how to talk to
normal people i i don't know what else
to say
actually we're gonna call them welfare
david actually shut the [Β __Β ] up dude
shut the [Β __Β ] up
you're trying to make communism or
socialism a religion
[Β __Β ] ain't that deep
also wouldn't cheap in socialism's name
labeling him as a fascist i don't
necessarily remember maybe using the
envelope i don't know which one
visions or gold or loyalties were but i
can't appreciate the fact yeah but boss
you do the same code switching when you
talk to writers you have to like speak
their language i don't think that's
really applicable here first of all hake
won't change any of his beliefs
it's not about hakes belief it's about
his audience and it's about the the
other audience that's that's undecided
why do you think it's about hake you
stupid [Β __Β ]
yes and second of all hake is a nazi
there's no reason to code switch no he's
not a [Β __Β ] nazi you idiot
you just haven't
see what a [Β __Β ] sheltered beverly
hills [Β __Β ]
i can't believe i'm going to la i'm
going to la
in like 15 days
god help me man god [Β __Β ] help me
god [Β __Β ] help me
stomaching the sickness and wrath
of that part of america
box vows
fat ass would never box me
he would never leave the [Β __Β ] cozy
confines of his compound
and box me
but
yeah if you live in beverly hills then
anyone right wing is a nazi
try to convince a nazi to your positions
if if you're a communist and you're ever
going to talk to a nazi and they're
on what basis do you accuse him of being
a nazi here's why i don't think he's a
nazi i don't think hake is a nazi
because
he's a subsidiary of jesse lee peterson
right
and
jessie lee peterson is like
just a regular old dumbass conservative
just like hank
he's not a nazi he's not a [Β __Β ] nazi
he's just like a guy who got a [Β __Β ]
whip
he's there's such a thing as people who
are just
dylan byrne said he's not a nazi either
because dylan comes from a conservative
family so he knows how this [Β __Β ] works
bosch lives in [Β __Β ] beverly hills
so he calls everyone a [Β __Β ] nazi
their opening line is i've heard you're
not as anti-white as other you know
people of your kind that don't mean
you're a nazi dude
that that means something in america
like
there's the black and white
racial division in america right
it's a thing
uh and you're less in favor of
degeneracy that that's not a good thing
it's also a kind of christian thing he's
coming from right
like is jesse lee peterson a nazi no but
he says the same [Β __Β ]
hake says the same [Β __Β ] that [Β __Β ]
hawk does
hakes is the same [Β __Β ] as jessie lee
peterson does
thank you that's quite a bad thing i'm
afraid actually there's a difference
between code switching and like just
appealing to them and like listen to how
nice he's being
listen how nice he's being
because this is the audience i care
about i don't [Β __Β ] care about your
dumb fat [Β __Β ] viewers i don't need your
[Β __Β ] reddit viewers
listen to how like no no code switching
is an appropriate term sometimes for
it's just like he's being very cloying
yeah that's something i do i'm very kind
to human beings
especially human beings
that i can't pin down to like a
political tribe
like you or in a discourse right
hawk is just a random guy and of course
i'm gonna be [Β __Β ] nice to him because
he's a human being i'm a human being too
no reason for me to be hostile
i've always maintained that principle
and remember vos even with you
you started the disrespect
when i came on your [Β __Β ] show and i
know you regret it now
but there's no taking nothing back
that he did kickstart a movement um of
americans who were fed up with the
system and who were fed up with the
establishment and he gave them a sense
of hope now do i think trump do i
believe trump himself personally is
going to be able to make due on the
expectations he's given to his movement
i don't necessarily think so and that's
why his communist we don't necessarily
want to go against the trump movement
we rather want to um show them that
there's a more effective way to fight
this establishment um than trump can i
mean trump for example um was so i agree
he was very much treated unfairly by the
media he was very much uh you know lied
about it and so on and on but at the
same time
did the media treat trump fairly
is that controversial or do people want
to like uh
are you against that
i'm
um i think as communist we want to
propose a more effective and better way
of coming as a communist we don't want
to fight against fascism didn't he
that we have to accept the premise trump
as a fascist which i won't accept
which you failed to prove many times
when you were pressed on it
argue with me that biden was a fascist
or was that another no that was that was
the other i argued with you that naval i
asked why is trump a fascist and
navalny's not
but yes even if i said biden's a fascist
so what
biden's way more fascist than trump okay
he something he i feel like he's that
was nico house i feel like he said it
too though hasn't i don't really
remember but um
so wait you do you find it absurd that i
would call uh
fighting a fascist and not trump
because
you think your political spectrum is
like
accurately maps onto reality like for
example
biden's uh kind of right wing but he's
still
he's not as right-wing as trump so how
could biden be less right-wing as trump
and still be a fascist
because not everything's about your made
up stupid [Β __Β ] political spectrum you
[Β __Β ] dumb liberal idealist [Β __Β ]
yeah
pretty sure how sad it's got me too so
like you know i'm pretty sure he's also
said like the necessity of fighting
against moderate dems i wonder why he
doesn't apply that same standard to
[Β __Β ]
republicans
no i've applied this i'm not talking
about moderate democrats at all
i'm talking about all democrats
moderate or progressive or conservative
all democrats are my enemy
not just moderate ones
all of them
combating the same uh forces that were
demonizing trump better than trump
himself right and also part of that
means um making more alliances right we
want to reach out and make alliances
with leaders of the black community
the republican party
is the party of false consciousness
it doesn't have a vision for the future
of this country it's just a way of
resisting the democrats
the democrats are the one with a plan
and an agenda and they have big tech and
silicon valley and davos and the major
financial institutions like big
corporate america that's democrat
aligned okay
the republicans are the party of false
consciousness so obviously i'm going to
go after the democrats the party of the
ruling class more than i do the
republicans the party of vain resistance
believe it or not the black community is
not you know as loyal to the democrats
as the mainstream media is trying to say
there's many black people who are fed up
with a democratic establishment many
latinos are fed up with it right so i
think we want to reach out and make even
more broad alliances with these groups
um listen he's literally in a
conversation about whether or not he
likes trump refusing to condemn trump
while simultaneously saying that there
are plenty of pocs who are fed up with
the dems like
what about it
it's so blindingly obvious who's on his
side
maybe
yeah i agree
you're a beverly hills socialist
we are definitely not on the same side
in this vouch
we are definitely not on the same side
i promise you i don't know why there is
a
you find this worth commenting on you
think i'm on your side false
you think i'm on your side
why point it out i'm definitely not on
your side voj
that the current trump movement hasn't
uh been too successful in doing i've
noticed that the um the communist people
that i call communists the people that
who commonly think of the anti-black
lives matter and i have a broader
definition than maybe others uh they
exploit the anger of the so-called
minorities
it seems like with this with this uh
version of communism that you have you
want to exploit the anger of everybody
you want to not exclude the fights and
it seems right for that because whites
are getting angry as well at what's
going on they've been yeah demoralized
yeah extra radical is a hundred percent
correct
conservatives are sometimes eager to
convince
because they acknowledge there is a
problem they just
get the problem and solution wrong
liberals are worse because there's no
problem to them they're at brunch
one thousand percent and actually for
people for liberals like vaush the only
problem
is the fact that people recognize
there's a problem
right could the the issue with
conservatives oh why don't they just
accept the smooth going of things as
they are
right and vash thinks that
his socialism is just a logical
conclusion of the smooth going of things
right and it's a misinterpretation of
marx who viewed which viewed communism
as a result of capitalism
but
the difference is that marx was talking
about the mode of production he wasn't
talking about the political
superstructure evolving into social and
he wasn't talking about
the main going of things under the
establishment evolving and such marx did
believe a radical and abrupt
overthrow of
the establishment
right
um and then with the rise of imperialism
it's a game changer it's a complete game
changer the rise of imperialism
by lenin's time which
when you are not dealing with this you
know liberal
real like demo liberal democratic
societies that may peacefully transition
to socialism you are dealing with the
like there's nothing democratic about
for example the obama democrats the
clinton democrats this is not actually
like the 19th century
liberal state this is an imperialist
state machinery that fundamentally extra
democratic fundamentally like fascist
and overgrowth right
overgrowth upon democracy and bond
liberal order lack of morals and they
see that injustice against explicitly in
many cases against them and men too so i
don't know you might you might be
successful in this yeah i think um the
first thing i would say is that you know
to me the okay there's one thing that
that paz can say here and be correct and
everything that isn't this thing is the
incorrect thing to say okay it's
incredibly simple okay
class injustice affects us all i think
we all have a right to be angry that's
it if you actually care like don't don't
like like that's all you have to say
yeah i find that like a pandering lib
[Β __Β ] thing to say and sounds [Β __Β ] soy
and kaino
that's it that's the only thing that you
have to say anything past that to me is
a massive rhetorical failure and
possibly an ideological one depending on
what else you say so-called antifa at
least in the united states they're very
clearly footholders of the democratic
establishment okay that was the wrong
thing to say we did indeed find a thing
that was rhetorically and ideologically
incorrect thank you you had the easiest
layup in the [Β __Β ] universe and and
this and and this was the direction
we are all affected by class injustice
what a [Β __Β ] gyno thing to say
um i don't know why walsh thinks he's an
authority on what good optics and bad
optics are uh
was what you said in destiny's distort
good optics
are you good optics yourself
do you look like someone who's good
optics i think you look like a
despicable fat [Β __Β ]
why should i ever care about what you
think is like
why are you who said you're an authority
on this you would you stink doesn't
matter
yeah every critique is haas why aren't
you pandering and winning me over
because you're my enemy dude you're
literally my enemy i don't want to win
you over vosh you're my enemy what do i
have to spell it out for you you are my
enemy i'm not here to win you over or
impress you
you're not my audience i don't want you
beverly hills people
action that we took it thank you very
much all right nice
one one answer
is he reactionary or just trying to sell
socialism via writing group he's
reactionary is a conservative it's just
all part of the hospital [Β __Β ] i need to
make another video on this
the the the broader project is taking
dissolution left-leaning people and
moving them to the right uh
he's gonna make a video don't worry my
video is coming out first you fat [Β __Β ]
but anyway
is that what i'm doing
i'm taking left leaning people and
moving them to the right
and i'm just a part of the pipeline from
left to nazi
if you become a literal nazi or
fascist or whatever you failed you
failed
it's like
everyone who's become like a hard woo
you know it's like
you've missed the plot
if you started as that
that's fine
but if you if you started out like a
communist
and
you became
a nazi because of me
that's not my fault it was not because
of me
yeah like there's the only people but
that wasn't because of me like the guy
the other carl
he went with those third position people
but they're totally against me right
those i don't know
they attacked me pretty hard
so
not really a pipeline
it's not an effective pipeline matter of
fact those people are more on your side
vosh believe it or not they're more with
you because they both they both agree
with you the idea like okay listen this
is what communism is this is what
fascism is
this is left this is right
so they agree with you
right
um
i have made as many leftists more
conservative as i have made
conservatives open to communism
if not way more the latter way more way
more way more i've made way more
conservatives interested in communism
than the reverse
thousand percent
like i know that for a fact i would not
be growing if that wasn't that's like
the only source of my growth at this
point
i don't grow from leftists i do not have
a pipeline from leftist all of the
people who started out as leftists in my
community
i got from like
six months ago right now the only people
that are growing
my brand are
right wingers so the pipeline is the in
the reverse bosh you stupid [Β __Β ]
has communist aesthetics that will
appeal to left-leaning people but then
he'll talk about how the dems are
actually worse than the republican uh
how do you know what's aesthetics and
what's not it's a completely arbitrary
distinction
you're going to call one thing
appearance in the other essence one
aesthetics and one content
solely based on what you view as the
essential linchpin
can you prove it objectively what's
aesthetical and what's essential
how do you determine that
you can't
general points i don't know if you
specifically said this but dems are
worse than republicans uh
because you know they mislead the public
and you know antifa are bad and the left
is bad and actually there's nothing
wrong yeah
yeah i agree with all those things
they're all bad with preserving
traditional culture and yeah et cetera
except you know china's totally
left-leaning guys nothing so so what so
why do you wait hold on is my communism
then just an aesthetic statement
because
i can actually demonstrate how those are
fundamentally communist positions
very easily
very very easily can demonstrate those
are communist positions
i'm fascist about this and eventually
you do sort of ideologically what china
did politically which is you use
communism as a kind of rhetorical
framework to justify fascism
and china is absolutely uh he doesn't
plan to racial animosity although no but
he downplays like the legitimacy of
racial conflict pretty often i'm pretty
sure like he does do that um
what is racial conflict is it the 1619
project
or is it the protest of the statue of
ben of thomas jefferson in new york
now black lives matter is an official
organization
he called systemic racism a meaningless
uh uh culture war divide i mean that's
did i
did i
no i didn't but it doesn't matter
because the fat ass makes up whatever he
wants
and he never gets called out for it he's
just a fat lying [Β __Β ] he's just a fat
lying [Β __Β ] right
only time i've ever been on lsf
was showing what a fat ass liar walsh is
by the way he's a known notorious liar
i've never said no such thing he's just
a [Β __Β ] liar
that's pretty bad right there
um and obviously it's very it's very
ambiguous and mysterious to say the
least about what interest exactly
they're serving but all i could pretty
much say is that there are legitimate
grievances within the black community
but i think those grievances are being
turned against the democrats uh
themselves after antifa i think the the
so-called anti-phenomena they're calling
themselves communism they're waving
communist flags but this isn't because
they're actually communists because
they're trying to instill fear and
conservatives they're trying to provoke
fear in the people that the so-called
deplorables are against the democratic
establishment and because most americans
and this is a result of the cold war
have fearful attitudes toward communism
um these people are trying to exploit
that fear and make themselves into a
boogeyman right now as far as the anger
and grievances that white people or men
are experiencing i don't necessarily
think this is because uh white people or
men are necessarily oppressed but i
think that um many working-class people
happen to be white happen to be men okay
very very regular people and one of the
ways that the establishment is trying to
show division between people is by you
know um trying to you know target or you
know sold racial divisions and make
people feel bad or guilty because
they're white and promote all this
[Β __Β ] about how we have to tear down
the statues of founding fathers
ah you know this is this is this is the
the racial line he's willing to meet on
he won't say that like racism is
[Β __Β ] or whatever uh he'll just say
like any social effort at fighting
racism is part of the elite
what social effort are you [Β __Β ]
talking about what social effort are you
referring to
all the things i just described are
anti-social efforts
distracting us you know that's all this
kind of stuff so i do agree that there's
legitimate anger there but i don't think
that we should show more of the division
and more of this attention i think we
should recognize it as an attempt by
those in power to divide people right
and what khan just want to do we want to
bring people together um
if you don't recognize the
overwhelmingly unifying power of
communism for every single
country that it took root in
you are just fundamentally [Β __Β ]
stupid
their real enemy and that real enemy is
the american establishment and the
monopolies what happens when you have a
movement
that literally unites 90 percent of
people against 10 i don't know
you know
wow
who would have thought that
something you you know
what do you think it's about you know
it's the bourgeoisie
but he's he's such a fake [Β __Β ] commie
dude it's the bourgeois that's the
honvaj why don't you uh hold your
aggression your gyno
is not giving way so
hold your horses you fat
[Β __Β ]
estrogenic [Β __Β ]
are you actually saying that it would be
appropriate to use the term bourgeois
when i'm talking to some random [Β __Β ]
guy
why would i say the bourgeois what do
you what do you mean you wait
is it does vosh mean to imply that the
bourgeois is just a theoretical
abstraction of the category of all who
own the means of production
and not an actual distinct social class
because i'm referring to a distinct
social class of society you're referring
to a theoretical abstraction you've
abstracted from the context of the 19th
century and plant and try to shoehorn
into today right
and it doesn't work when you try to
shoehorn it into today by the way
um
the bourgeoisie
is a specific social formation that
existed in europe if you were a random
dumb [Β __Β ] and you went and told the
person the bourgeoisie they would say i
know what you mean
i know those people you're talking about
it'd be like that right
but if you
if you were to tell that to someone
today
you know
they would be like what is that french
word you're using i don't know what the
[Β __Β ] that is but if you talk about the
establishment and like the elites and
stuff
you know
people understand what you mean
but if you want to know what the
equivalent to the bourgeoisie today is
who's either the specific it's a
specific social formation has very
cultural characters and so on the
professional managerials are bourgeois
they're bourgeoisie bourgeois is coming
from
urban dwellers it literally means uh
what does it mean
wall dweller something like that dwells
within the walls of the city right
that's what the bouzouzi means
so it has a connotation of being heavily
urbanized and enlightened and yeah it
has this connotation like upper middle
class that's really what bourgeois means
within institutions yes and the reason
why the bourgeoisie
were
synonymous with a capitalist class is
because the way in which capitalists
relate to society is the same way that
the bourgeoisie does from the
perspective of social abstraction
the capitalists
um
see all society as reducible to the
common measurement and common standard
of money much in the same way that urban
dwellers
view all culture and all social
sociality under the common standard
created by institutions and so on and so
on i mean
marx makes the direct comparison here
not in l.a with zirca
uh that's not gonna be until
later this month
yeah voss is the definition of bourgeois
doesn't necessarily mean you own
factories or even that you own means of
production
the reason why the bourgeoisie
is synonymous with the capitalists in
the 19th century
is because
by owning the means of production
they're owning it from the
like from the uh position
of
an institutionally mediated relationship
with the economy
you don't sell you the proletariat is
more down to earth they sell their own
labor right it's based on labor
it's not based on abstraction it's based
on
determinate particular reality
material reality
is idealist the proletariat is
materialist so on and so on
the enemy not the american elite because
it has nothing to do with america there
are plenty of capitalist countries
but in the communist manifesto
marx and engels said that the class
struggle
will be national in form
so even if we even if we're abiding by
your dogmatic view of what the ruling
class is all those who own means of
production
theoretical abstraction and not a
concrete social formation
that is something that's going to be
national in form so it no it's not going
to refer to
every single capitalist in every country
in the american context
if we're if we're waging a class
struggle in america we're talking about
the american ruling class not the ruling
class and [Β __Β ] britain and france
right
what the [Β __Β ] is val saying
he's he's he's elevating the bourgeoisie
into a theoretical abstraction that
becomes universalized and applied
it's like the theory
is superimposed on the entire world
rather than deriving the theory from the
determinate world you know what i'm
saying it's like
he has this airy fairy abstraction first
and then he deals with the particular
concrete realities but didn't angles
literally say that whereas hegel went
from the
uh concrete to the abstract we want to
begin from the abstract
i'm sorry where hegel wanted to begin
from the universal and arrive at the
particular we seek to begin with the
particular and then arrive at the
universal
he has to say american because china
also has bourgeois no i have to say
american because class struggle is
national in form which is what marx and
engels literally said how the [Β __Β ] are
you
fat ass vows going to wage a class
struggle
how is it politically relevant for you
to rail against the so-called chinese
bourgeoisie even though there's no
chinese bourgeoisie
how would you do that
how is that even meaningful right how is
that even meaningful um and uh and he
has to say monopolies because china does
have some anti-monopoly protections
except funnily enough against no i have
to say monopolies because i don't know
if you know you're not really up to date
but
we're talking about the highest stage of
capitalism which is monopoly capitalism
so i'm i'm following lenin's lead
and i'm talking about monopolies because
i need to very make it very clear to
people like hake
that we are not talking about small
business owners or the petite
bourgeoisie we're talking about
monopolies and yes that is the
that is what communists make their enemy
communists don't antagonize the
bourgeoisie they've never done that in
history they antagonized the monopolies
those that's the class enemy the real
ruling class when you know when we talk
about the ruling class we're not talking
about a theory we're talking about like
the actual ruling class like you know
the real one the real ruling class like
actual ruling class not the not the
imagined abstract ruling class
that's
it's like the the real one that actually
does rule our [Β __Β ] society that is
literally what we're talking about how
right wing how right-wing how right-wing
weren't the kulaks literally petite
bourgeois no they were [Β __Β ] not
no they were not
the kulaks were not even real
capitalists
they just hoarded wealth and they didn't
[Β __Β ] put it to productive use
the kulaks
were a mutation of peasants greedy
peasants
were as an attempt to make them
capitalist they never actually became
real capitalists they hoarded wealth and
they didn't [Β __Β ] spend it in a way
that capitalists would that's why
bukharin was wrong
that's itself um yeah but he he won't
actually name
yeah he's he's using language that could
be mistaken for for like the jewish
question i think it's deliberate you
know um
so to be clear
we have it on record bausch is caught on
record saying that he believes
the ruling class is jewish
he believes the ruling elites
are jews
as someone who actually has studied the
ruling elites
and the monopolists
the overwhelming majority are actually
not jewish
by the way they're actually not
i've studied it they're not
but even if they were
right let's just entertain the idea that
they were which is an anti-semitic
conspiracy theory that vows subscribes
to he believes it but he lies about it
because
he doesn't like the consequences of that
idea why do they always assume jewish
when someone mentions the ruling class
because they're anti-semites i'm going
to tell you why because vash is an
anti-semite he actually is in his core
and anti-semite he just doesn't say it
out loud because he doesn't want to own
up
the implications of being an anti-semite
meanwhile
i'm actually not an anti-semite i don't
think the jews are in control or
whatever so i don't have to worry about
the bad consequences of thinking that's
factually true because i don't believe
it i don't believe it
it's like in terms of factual reality i
do not [Β __Β ] believe it
the the american elite you know the the
industrialists the global like that all
that stuff this is
why you why so when you think of
american elite why does jewish come to
mind and not
waspi like east coast legacy money from
17
the rockefellers the morgans are the
morgans jewish i don't think they are
you know why doesn't that come to mind
the coke yeah why doesn't it
the rothschilds were big in europe
and no the morgans were not jewish i
looked it up now they're not jewish
when i think the american elites i think
i don't think of jewish people when i
think of american jews i think of
the same people who came on the
immigration wave alongside italians
anything i think of like italians like
new jersey italians right
and puerto ricans
puerto ricans and italians right
um
i don't think of like
the elites
i'm sure there's very there's people
yeah italians irish poles jews they're
all part yeah ellis island immigrants
that's what i think of ellis island
immigrants
they are not the people who rule this
country
some may have very prominent positions i
have no doubt but
you know
so do lebanese people also have
prominent positions in certain
industries and certain whatever it's
it's not because they control everything
this language like uh you know nazis
will will sort of code with
anti-semitism um
i don't know if he's doing it liberally
or not but i have no reason to believe
he wouldn't given his [Β __Β ] sorrow i
think if you're an anti-semite do you
think that which you are right you are
vosh
the davos man considered the elite
soros rothschild [Β __Β ] earlier but like
it's just
did you guys catch that lie
anyone catch that lie i want to know if
anyone caught the lie he just said
anyone you didn't catch it that's scary
then that's [Β __Β ] scary you didn't
catch that
yup auto barn got it
i never said rothschilds i said the
rockefellers i did not say rothschilds i
didn't say that once
wow guys this guy gets you
you see how you just got gaslit by him
he literally gaslighted you he literally
just gaslighted you in real time and you
didn't even catch it
isn't that scary
you guys need to be more vigilant
because these are [Β __Β ] liars every
single word they say is a [Β __Β ] lie
you need to be very vigilant he just he
just gaslighted you guys into thinking
well
maybe haas did insinuate jews you know
he did say soros and rothschilds
no i didn't i said rockefellers right
wow that's scary that you guys didn't
catch that that's scary as [Β __Β ]
that's so [Β __Β ] scary
that is so [Β __Β ] scary you didn't even
catch that
he's so [Β __Β ] uninterested in actually
promoting a materialist view of the
world but because he
okay so materialism means
you apply abstract
concepts to reality
instead of beginning from the concrete
social formations and distinctions
that are managed to reproduce themselves
in reality independently of the theory
right
so materialism is when you begin from
abstraction and ideas
and idealism is when you begin from
concrete reality right
he will not name
the bourgeois
who are the bourgeois
what is the bourgeois who are they all
those who are on the means period okay
with roll that back who are they what
does that mean who are they specifically
how do american how do
you make how do you make sense of that
to americans are you just gonna
so i can't believe i have to explain
this this is going to be good we're all
putting this in the video don't worry
but i can't believe i have to explain
this right
but
so if you begin with the idea that
the bourgeois control this country and
who are the bourgeois well i don't know
but it's everyone who owns the means of
production
um
this leads to a paranoid perspective and
i'll explain it's a paranoid and
dogmatic perspective because you then
must
check with your ideology every single
time you evaluate
and confront reality you're gonna
superimpose this ideological construct
and see patterns where they don't exist
you're going to find patterns that don't
reproduce themselves organically so for
example
if i say the bourgeoisie rules and the
bourgeoisie is just all those who own
the means of production right
that belief is not going to be confirmed
organically and in how i participate in
reality right
hakee or let's say a random dumbass a
random worker random person right
they're not going to
understand the essentiality
of
that claim
like if you tell them the bourgeoisies
all those who own the means of
production
okay i get that the corporations own
means of production and the elites own
it so i get that but then you're gonna
go and say
also
this small business owner is bourgeois
and he's your enemy and the person's
gonna say well sorry that doesn't make
sense to me right i don't see them that
way
i don't view them that way
this capitalist owner right is your
enemy
there's many people they're going to say
that doesn't make sense to me right you
have to be invested in the ideology
for that to make sense to you if you're
not invested in the ideology
it's not going to make sense to you so
what you're doing is you're
you're um
finding patterns and plugging in holes
in reality with i that requires the
ideology without the ideology
you know
um
you're not going to find the pattern of
the bourgeoisie in reality you're gonna
find that you're gonna if you begin with
from an ideologically unbiased
perspective and just investigate our
reality no prejudices no ideological
investment no bias right
you're going to
discover unique social formations with a
specific way of life specific
networks of wealth and and and
connections and businesses and so on and
so on
and it's it's you're gonna it's like it
this is the difference between the
materialist view and the idealistic the
materials view is like you cut off all
your prejudices and just deal with
reality scientifically
and then you arrive at a conclusion the
idealist perspective is i'm going to
begin with the bourgeoisie and then try
to like force reality to conform to that
mold
and the reason it's a paranoid and
unscientific and idealist view
is because
the entire significance of the
bourgeoisie is going to hinge upon the
ideological desire to have workers
ownership of the means of production so
the reason why we should consider the
bourgeoisie our enemy is because of this
specific ideological intention of having
the workers owning the means of
production a completely arbitrary
intention
but that's not a material interest
you're not ever going to discover
where in material reality these
distinctions are going to be reproduced
it's all going to be within the ideology
do you guys get that
like the reason why i the how you can
tell there's an authentic point of
material distinction
is when there's like a million different
ways of looking at it ideologically it's
fundamentally ambiguous well yes some
people
try to do it with anti-semitism some
people have other conspiracy theories
some people have other conspiracy
theories reptilians uh all sorts of [Β __Β ]
right but there's just like this
fundamental deadlock in this symptom
right that's there
that's how you can tell there's
something material there right they're
trying to fill the holes in all kinds of
ways but when you try to plug the hole
and like
totalize the meaning that's when you end
up with paranoia that's the logic of
anti-semitism too by the way right
it's the same thing
is you're creating this totalizing
ideological view
about something that's inherently
ambiguous and material it's not
ideological it's material right
so when marx and engels are talking
about class they're not talking about
ideals they're talking about what they
consider to be real material
distinctions that reproduce themselves
independently of ideology
you don't need ideology
to recognize it it's there
people relate you know
the fact of a bourgeoisie existing in
the 19th century in the 20th century you
did not have to be a communist a
socialist or a marxist to recognize that
you did not have to be someone who is
committed to a specific political
project to recognize yeah there's a
boudoir of course there's a bourgeoisie
liberals could recognize wazi uh
reactionaries could recognize those abu
zuazi monarchists and socialists and the
rest of them everyone could see there's
a buzzword right
just like when i refer to
you know
uh
wall street
do you have to be committed to like some
political project to recognize wall
street in this country no you don't
because it's very clear what who that is
and what it represents right
in silicon valley right
so
that's the difference between a material
is due and an ideal issue materials view
is is not looking for you're not
defining reality solely in terms of your
intentions your conscious intentions in
relation to it you're defining reality
in terms of material distinctions that
are objectively there regardless of how
you respond to them
there is this fundamental deadlock we
cannot get around
right we want to pretend we're all the
same
it's just not the case there's this
deadlock right there's something
different
some symptom in this economy just
different classes
we can't get around these differences
by pretending they don't exist
he keeps like i can't get around the
difference of a silicon valley engineer
and a [Β __Β ] coal miner i just there's
something unbridgeable about that right
and there's a reason there's something
unbridgeable about that because they
belong to different classes
that's the meaning of class differences
it's not
uh some dogma that you impose on reality
first you derive it from the
distinctions that are actually in
reality
tiptoeing around it
that is there is some truth to that but
um
the enemy is within it's a good versus
evil and lucky anything anybody with
anger is gonna be gonna end up working
against their own interests i don't
think that the black rockefeller not
really sorry
at least none of that none that they're
uh oh someone corrected him well are the
rockefellers jewish ross what the [Β __Β ]
are you talking about i'm crying about
anything you're crying about in the
mainstream
well the the the black people are being
given representation in the mainstream
don't necessarily represent um the
grievances of lightning i do think the
black community has many legitimate
grievances
yeah sure um they don't have enough
self-determination and independence
they're ruled by police departments that
aren't really connected to the community
much in the same way that rural people
in the united states have been you know
since the 90s and 2000s especially ruled
by these federal agencies that are
completely disconnected with them right
hold on
i think that was okay yeah so he brought
up a good point which is that uh a ton
of black people live under the thumb of
like restrictive police occupation but
you know basically we're using sort of
evocative language here but i'll take it
um and then he's pointing out that and
it's true that a lot of rural people's
livelihoods is completely determined by
like the abstract bureaucratic uh
decision-making of federal agencies with
regards to subsidies or like a bunch of
other stuff state and federal um that
that control because like rural
communities don't have much locally to
pull on so they're kind of reliant in a
lot of ways on what goes on beyond the
confines of their community their their
does that make sense that was actually
an okay point i'll take that and it was
a good way of relating because hake will
defend rural communities because they're
coded white where the amount of crime
that's happening in these communities
it's actually not really about white and
black that's not the essence of the
matter you know if you're a racist like
vos you're gonna think that's the
essence yes i get it rule will have the
association of white but the essence is
not white
does that make sense yes they're mostly
white i get it you're gonna associate it
with white people i get it
but
the essence is not about race
the essence of what rule in america is
is not like if you did if black people
could blend blend in in rural america
you know
mexican
i could [Β __Β ] join rural america and i
am i white i don't know an arab dude you
know you could you could and you could
be part of the community now is it
mostly white yes
but that's not the essence if that was
the essence then only white people could
be rule that's not true so it's not an
essence it's not the essence of the
matter there's a reason why it's co it's
associated with white
historical and so on reasons
because who are white people you have to
trace their lineage back
a ways away
white people europe people of european
descent i should say
were the
overwhelming majority of people
in america for a very long time
you had the black community
which was historically segregated from
white communities
and actually it's it's not just because
of segregation can i say something a
little bit controversial
most people who consider themselves a
distinct people
tend really not to
mix all that much in the rural context
like in lebanon
the shia
and the sunni and the christians they
will mix in beirut but
in the countryside
you know they may usually just stick to
themselves i bet it's the same thing
around the whole world right different
groups
mostly just stick to themselves most of
the time right
it's not always racial either it could
be a bunch of other things but if it's a
different group they're gonna tend to
stick to themselves at the most
fundamental level and it's not just
because
you know it's because there's just
different ways of life and there's
different cultures and
you also have to acknowledge black
people do have a distinct culture they
have their own traditions and culture
and you know ways of life
um
that white people are not part of right
how the family works exactly
those kinds of things right a lot of
people have this racist idea that black
culture is solely defined
in terms of problems
and that's a racist lie black culture is
not solely defined in terms of uh
problems there is a really distinct
black culture that's
specific you know
sp specific to black people
for more police right but i'm not
denying that there's a reality of crime
i just need a vicious cycle in which the
economic conditions that are promoting
crime uh mainly from this wholesale
robbery and scamming of america's uh
black population by the democrats
specifically
reel it in
okay
is it the republicans that rule black
communities
who
so
it's been many decades is it republicans
who rule black communities or is it
democrats i'm not quite sure
also what about the black community
under obama so
black communities under
how do you want to measure this do you
need the federal government to be
democrat do you need the state
government to be democrat
well black communities have states
local governments city governments
federal governments that are democrat
and they don't make a damn [Β __Β ]
difference
not only do they not make a damn [Β __Β ]
difference to the black community
they have consolidated
the political energies of black america
toward ends that don't help black
america
so
what is this is this something to laugh
about when does john get live man i
don't know bro
i don't know
really reel it in a little bit farther
just just a little just a little bit
farther oh my god it's a bipartisan
issue oh my god okay well
[Laughter]
all right that was that was good that
was pretty funny that was well timed it
was comedy gold
at least you know the attempt by the
democrats that seems at least clear to
me to target families right make
families better to start this creates a
vicious cycle which then leads i think i
think i did message him earlier today he
didn't respond
so it's kind of weird
also too uh vicious very vicious i'm
strange just busy i'm sure he's just
busy you know
no need to panic
police repression now i do agree that
much of the so-called black lives matter
protests were not coming from black
people that were coming from
actually primarily white leftists who
are serving interests of the democrats i
think it's because oh my god
am i wrong
he can't stop he can't stop he can't
refrain there was an issue with blm
protests having you know white agitator
antifa whatever guys who were just super
horny to throw molotovs you know like
that was yeah but the majority of black
lives matter protests were coming from
white people
is that under dispute now a bit of an
issue but like overwhelmingly the people
who attended blm protests were people
there in good faith for blm and how
okay what does that mean
first of all what is blm second of all
what does that mean
and it's interesting the class divide
the more wealthy the white community the
more they were likely to virtue signal
and and you know
pretend to be the yeah it's the white
savior complex that's what i'm exactly
exactly what i'm [Β __Β ] saying
you know
if all says that's good faith okay
just you're just saying good faith
what's bad faith
most trump supporters in good faith want
to save america if you just define
everything in terms of the
superficial ideology then you have to be
more consistent
white agitators are protests are not
serving i mean he said that antifa is
like a tool of the democrats so i mean
he's gonna which they are just
conservative talking point his way up
the democrats are trying to twist the
legitimate grievances of america's
various minorities by sending them turn
them into a way that will serve their
own interests even though the democrats
are the ones how's that wrong
they've betrayed and robbed these same
people for decades now our solution to
that is to focus on the anger and then
you know aggravate grievances the white
outside agitator trope goes back to
slave days and kkk talking points yeah i
know it does yeah the idea that like
like white race traitors are mixing in
with the agitated black people and
stirring things up
well good thing i'm not saying that
because that would imply that
black people are involved in some
capacity whatsoever but they're not
that's the thing these aren't outside
agitators agitating black people to riot
they're white people who are just
rioting
in the name of black people so no it
does it's not the the outside agitator
troll you [Β __Β ] idiot
that black people are normally fine and
dandy calm and a-okay with how things
are going it's just these you know uh
these these goody two-shoe whites that
are rolling on in there um
and and you know
starting up trouble that's a pretty old
talking point i just i don't think it's
that evocative in the blm yeah yeah the
hijacking the movement it's a really
good way to legitimize what
how does that have anything to do with
what i
said is a movement because all you have
to do is say oh well they've been
hijacked by these guys and like then you
don't have to respond to any of their
talking points you know like oh blm oh
well they're doing this because they've
been hijacked talk to me when they're a
real movement that really represents the
black population and of course such a
thing will never happen because there's
no way of empirically determining when
you've reached that point so it's yeah
it's just an ongoing sort of cycle
okay guys
i wanted to finish this but we have an
hour and 30 minutes left on that video
so we're gonna have to save it for
tomorrow we're gonna finish it tomorrow
we're gonna respond to the cpusa
tomorrow hopefully tomorrow will also be
a long stream you know seven hours
stream guys it's not bad it ain't bad
right it ain't that bad
seven i gotta go though i really i'm
overdue really late but
damn
did i rate frogan the traitor
i have to no one else is live
i'll see you tomorrow guys
see you tomorrow