πŸ”΄ RED NEWS | HEZBOLLAH ATTACK | UKRAINE | AMERICAN COMMUNIST PARTY UPDATES

2024-08-12T01:33:04+00:00
money and i'm making move side of waves i've been dreaming i'm a flying for a long time i had a
reason from the place and want to come aside i'm especially intelligent anyway i'm
i'm a fit you, patsy, I'm a busy, of this illusion, I'm not reallylight and I'm a missing of this illusion
I'm not really here I'm an intrusion
I don't swing my seat I just blow
I don't need gravity I just need no
when I'm moving this and I'm Just a mess With you rumble
I'll never have a fool
Never stumble
And I don't need to be
humble
Great now
I was
And here you go
One way
I
Yeah
I'm I'm high, I'm from outer space.
I got milky, weak, but blood, evolution in my day. I'm gold. I'm from outer space I got milky weak with blood evolution in my
day
I'm gone
I've been far away
I'm on new money
and now I'm making most
tired of waves
I've been dreaming
I've been flying
for a long time
I had a vision
from the base
they want to go aside I'm just in fact and guess and I'm a firelight
And I'm a miscellation of this illusion
I ain't not bitter here I'm an intrusion
I don't spend my saying I'm just blow I don't spend my city
I'm just broke
I don't need clarity
I just need to
Oh
When I'm home
This one's a fix
I'm gonna never have a fool
Never seen before
Never sung ball
And I don't need to be You're on the ball and I don't need
me
I'm going to break
a lot I'm I'm hot, I'm from out of space.
I got milky with the blood evolution in my face. I'm hot, I'm from outer space I got milky with the blood
evolution in my face
I'm gone, I've been far away
I'm a new money and now
I'm making a moon scar to waste
I've been dreaming of my flying for a long time
I had a vision from the place
and wanted to come by I had a vision from the waste and one a close
sign.
I had a
push of
a dead
in genuine
way I
I'm a
place in
I'm a
fighting and I'm a
missing
of this illusion
I am
really here
I'm an intrusion
I don't streamer seat
I just grow
I don't need gravity
I just need no
When I move
I'll never have a fool
I'll never have a fool
never come
Oh And I don't need to be humble
Great now once in a day for a couple come down Thank you. I'm high, I'm from outer space.
I've got milky wiper blood evolution in my vein.
I'm gone.
I've been far away.
I'm on new money and now I'll make a move
start away
So I've been dreaming
I'm flying for a long time
I had a vision
from the place
they wanted to throw aside
I'm pushing
and turn it
anyway
I'm sick
and fast and pass and passing I'm a sick fast and fast and
I'm a firelight
and I'm a missing
of disillusion
I am not
better here
I'm an intrusion
I don't spend my
day
I just go
I don't need
clarity
I just need though Oh and't need clarity. I just need to go.
Oh.
When I'm no one, just going to miss the face, I'll never have a fool, never send me on.
And I don't need to me on the phone.
Break down, one, take it all for my
one. Come for right now I'll take the way for one day. I'm happy. I'm happy. You know, I've met with you I've met with friends A girl, young My wife
I went
I said,
You're
I'm in the
I'm
I'm in
She'd Della I'm
He didn't
He's
He'd
To be
You'd
But you But you You You you'd I had you podraslet A you
When you
I was You're I was
You just
I'm gonna
I'm gonna
I'm gonna I'm gonna
You've
You've
You've
You know
You said
me
I
You've
I was
I was
I was
I'm I was I was, and I was And I was I was
I was
I just curing
and I got
I bought
I've got
I've got I said
But I
said you I You, you I was You you I was invited you to go to But he said, You've got to
You're You're
You're
You're just
You know
You're not
I've got I've got
But I've
I've got
You're
Mehors
Meh
Meh
Meh Meh I'm
I'm Here, I'm I You know, Me, I'm
Right,
I'm
here
You know
You're
You've
You've
You've
You're
You
You
You've You I've
You You've You'veac I've been You've provided
me
I'm home
But not said
You know
I'm just
I'm surprised
I'm just
I'm sure
I'm
I was
I was
I just
I just curing
and I bought I was I just I just curing and
I'm
I'm up
I
I've
I've
I've
called you
I'm
told
you
I'm you I'm
I'm
you
I'm
I And so we're still I'm
And now
I'm And, we're again with with my girl, youngness
my
but on my very
I don't
I've
I'm
I'm
I'm I'm
no need
I don't
I want to
to call to
I'm
and you you I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm
I'm
You're
I'm
You
I'm
You've
You
provided
You I'm
You've
You
I'm I
I'm
I'm I'm I was I was I was
I was
I was
I was
I was I was
I was
I was
I was
I was
I was
I said
you but I you you you and I you and you and I was I was going to go to
I was
I was
I was
I was
I was curingly
I conyat
I've
I've
I've
I've I'm provided You But I'm
I said
You post
You're out of
You're
I'm just
And I'm
You're
I'm going
I'm
You're You know, The I knew straight up when I met you
I saw it in your eyes
That it will be like mine
Just don't think I'll ever forget you
No no no
But those moments spent with you
Till the sky's turning blue
I'll see you on the other side
We'll say a bitter sweet goodbye
Tonight
Can we keep this higher life?
Tonight
I'll see you on another life
to do it out again sometimes khanori khanori harmonias Well he was Well he was Thailand-based, she was an Air Force wife, he used to fly weekends, it was the easy life, but then he turned around, and he began to change, she didn't wonder then, she didn't think it's strange, but then he began to change she didn't wonder then she didn't think it's strange but then he got a call he had to leave that night he couldn't say too much but it would be all right he didn't need to back they They meet the next night.
He had a job to do.
Fly into Cambodia. I'm going to be. I'm going to I'm going to and as the night and as
she tried to trace the past away and as the night stepped by
she tried to trace the past
the way he used to look
the way he used to laugh
I guess you'll never know
what got inside his soul
she couldn't make it up
just couldn't take it all
He had the saddest eyes the girl had ever seen
He used to cry some nights as though he lived a dream
And as she held him close he used to search her face
As though she knew the truth
The Lost in Sa Cambodia search her face as though she knew the truth Lock and psychombolea
Oh I'm Well, then a call came through.
They said it'd soon be home. She had to pack her case, and they would make a rendezvous.
But now a year has passed, and not a single word, and all the love she knew had disappeared out in the
name
in the eyes And I think here's our first we're not a single word, But there is only one thing left
I know for sure
She won't see his face again You know, Let's go, let's go. yeah
let's go
let's go
you are truly mine
I remember
a time
full of sunshine
oh time you are full of sunshine oh
the time
you are truly mine
I remember the time
full of sunshine
I'm trying to do this one day
in a time
I put my whole life into these lines
Yeah nothing can stop us now you don't want a problem pal yes I came a long way since I was a problem child same guy always been trying to make my mama proud reaching for the stars praying I won't ever touch the ground I gotta do this now with a sun still shining no matter how you get it gotta see the silver lining remember when we came up everybody tried to clown it's not the same people trying to say that they're the ones that found us all the minutes all the hours all the tears we Now we're up, feel the power screaming out the world is down
This is close to my voice looking at me through the glass
I don't gotta lie to you, I don't gotta wear a mask
I just gotta be me and stay true to my last
Dying day I did everything I could to make it bad
Oh my time I did everything I could to make it bad Oh, the time
You were truly mine
I remember the time
Who loves sunshine
Gun, sunshine
Oh,
time
You were truly mine
I'm not for the time
You love sunshine
Yeah
We always told each other we can do anything that we want
And nothing could stop us
I got the ball, not gonna drop it
No one can take this away from us, that's a promise.
Can't let this moment slip away, can't have that on my conscience.
I admit I lost my way, I was unfaithful, but it's a new day, and I'm so grateful.
I still got a chance to show you that I'm worth it.
Can't take back what I did, because you know that I'm not perfect.
Hold my head up to the sky
through the clouds all survive.
No regrets, I'm alive.
No more tears, let's get high.
Remember this moment for the rest of our lives.
Just know that I love you and memories will never die.
This is all I've ever known.
The stage is my throne throne this is where I belong
don't never feel alone just remember this day and everything that I said the sun will
still shine long after I'm dead yeah oh the time you were truly mine I remember the time full of sunshine
Oh, the time
You were truly mine
I remember the time
Cool of sunshine You know, The The President . He was from the barred on the barricle of the barricle,
He went from the red-snamean, He went, The Cros'n'n'nge
Commander-Polk
A-Love Vezan Vezan
A-Roole
A-Sle Ones the Slend-Grow-Besteads On the sireau-te
Yeah
On the
Sloroy Trow
Cl'
Who are Who will
Who will Who Who Who are you will be who's who's war
Who, who, who,
Who, with the red-sname
Rannaned, and he
We, Scyndrabs' We, we're for New Yearce our s'rothi'r's going to the stoneman's stills is under the
stoneman's crossy commander
we're here in cold and in cold
And in cold
In his life
It was
But not
Notarme
Forlet,
blood
It was
Fordna
Fordano
Throzenly
Luton
Vrosy
Lundon
Vrack
Sackal
Svod
Chess N' D' D'r The city's We're
With chast
We're
Chess'n Darogah
Tishina
at the
Berega
smolk
Galae
Suns
To the Cllins P, Padoe Rasse The suns to the nis'nizu clonits,
Padae'n'rae
L'homchice, connets,
heard, stu'c'c'c'n, Srasnoy, On the wind
Shumet.
Ech,
on the
wind
shunee. You You know, You know, The and so
the and
Oh, and the
Polo's What the
What the fuck? Smudley.
Everyone thanks Smudley because the intro is now over and the stream's going to start.
Smudley! Wow!
Wow! stream's going to start smartly wow and I'm gonna sing for Smardley too
I'm gonna sing for this guy
Alright
Holy shit, a hundred subs
Alright ready
And there it goes
One hundred subs
The Smudley's Herein' air Dream 100 songs The smartling's
killing and
dream
And we got it good
And the in person of man
And everybody
Thank him He is a hero He and everybody thank him
he is a hero
I can't believe
he got it all
for everybody's smart
he's a hero
And everybody
Always trying to say that infrared is funded by foreign countries and all this stuff
Because they just don't watch the streams and they can't plainly see it's really smartly behind it
oh i can't believe what's going and every street we got it good and every time we always sponsored by and it's all good and in the band
coming in September
everybody got a fan
his name was smirgly
my voice is breaking right I know y'all get it though right The I'm I'm
I'm I'm
I'm
The The You know, Yo, for real. What's going on? Smardley. I appreciate that, brother. Thank you so much.
What's up, everybody?
I just got done recording a podcast.
I thought it would be live.
It's not live.
But here we are anyway.
And we have a lot of content.
We have a lot of things to talk about.
And I think there's some guy being told he wants to debate or something let's see if he
shows up maybe maybe not i'm not sure but you know and we have a lot to talk about um so I'm going to tell you that Hezbollah has just launched rockets into Israel and it made the iron phone.
The iron phone.
Ha ha.
The Iron Dome dysfunctional. Didn't work. Wasn't able to stop it. So the Iron Dome is a big fucking bullshit nonsense. Nothing Burger. Everyone's known that for a long time it's a psychological dome it's not actually real
i mean it's real but it's like it barely works it's very easy to bypass it all right it's a
nothing burger psychological mainly so that's the news on there and then let me talk about Ukraine. I want to talk about this because like NAFO won't shut the fuck up about it. Every time there's one of these ridiculous brazen, desperate acts by the Azov, Ukraine,
shithole, you know,
NATO terrorist scumbags.
It goes viral
on Twitter and everyone, like, uses it as
hopium. Oh my God, Ukraine's going to win them.
And then, and then
as soon as it's crushed and then as soon as it's crushed
and as soon as it
obviously fails which it will
and it's unable to reverse the overall
tide of
holy shit
Andrew
Andrew Socialism
What an interesting name but wow the gifted subscriptions speak for themselves
25 holy shit amirio is that guy banned that's the type of person that amirio, is that guy banned?
That's the type of person that Amirio would ban right away, right?
Well, if he is un-band him, all right, he's earned his, all right, he's not, okay, because he earned his freedom, whoever that is.
25, wow. Wow. Wow. Thank you so much. Really. Wow.
Anyway, guys, as I was saying, as I was saying, as soon as this shit gets crushed, we're not going to hear anything of it.
That's what I've, the past two years of the SMO, every time Ukraine, I mean, every time Ukraine, it's like, it's like a Scooby-Doo villain or something. It's like they're always coming up with these new, it's like Eded and Eddie, they're always coming up with some new plan to save Ukraine. It's a new contraption. It's a new, it's a new thing. And NAFo makes it go viral on twitter oh my god this is the end of putler this is the end of putler and then when it gets crushed we don't hear
anything of it ever again what happened to the german leopard tanks all right what happened to the javelins what happened to the German leopard tanks, all right? What happened
to the javelins? What happened to the German
leopard tanks? You guys remember they
kept making memes of those fucking German
tanks? Oh, this is the game
changer. Those tanks from the leopard
tanks, the leopard tanks, and then
nothing happened, all right?
So this is going to be the same thing.
It's going to go viral now.
Nothing will happen.
Oh yeah, hi Mars.
Hi Mars!
And nothing happened.
All right.
Now, this is a new nothing burger where
a curse is they're taking over
Russia with Korea and then nothing is
going to happen. It's going to get crushed
and then we're not going to, they're not going to say
anything. We're not going to. You know what it is?
It's like fucking like crypto scam
or something. It's like you hear it when they keep pumping it. They're pumping it to the moon. But then when it fails and it crashes, they take the money and they run. There's no accountability. Yeah, it's a fucking pump and dump. That's what, you know, Ukraine is a pump and dump army.
That's what it is. They pump and dump. They hype bullshit nonsense. And it's like, it's literally like that.
And it's like they're fooling the investors to keep pushing money into it the investors being western audiences signing on board to send so much military aid to ukraine
they keep doing these things to convince the west that it's still viable to fund Ukraine.
That's why they do this shit.
And it's literally just some nonsense pump and dump scheme that will always fail, but they'll never cease to find creative ways to deceive Western retards from continuing to fund them.
Oh, it's still viable.
Look, Russia may not be taking Ukraine in one day.
Whatever.
Their strategy is their strategy.
But like, come on, guys.
Ukraine doesn't have a...
Ukraine never had a fucking chance in this war.
And you want to ask me, what Russia's been doing,
they've been basically having all the NATO stockpiles get wasted.
They're like wasting all of these NATO stockpiles and bleeding them out.
And then when Russia feels like it, they'll, you know, they'll do whatever they want.
But that's what's been going on.
And, you know, what?
You really think Ukraine ever had a chance?
Don't be stupid, all right?
Don't be stupid.
They've never had a chance in this war.
Don't be stupid. They've never had a chance in this war. Don't be stupid.
You know, a lot of stupid people think,
Oh,
Hopium, it's going to, it's finally happening.
No, it's not. The thing that's actually happening,
look, steadily but slowly, all we've seen is the incorporation of new territory. All we've seen is Russia taking new territory. That's all we've actually seen. A lot of people think this war is a stalemate. It's not a stalemate.
It's just that Russia is just taking its time for whatever reason.
But the only changes that have happened,
you know, these NAFO retards still talk about the first two days of the SMO.
Russia failed to take Kiev.
You really think that Russia wants to take Kiev right away?
No, they don't.
They were doing some nonsense.
Clearly it was like some attacking arms depots and whatever but like they're not actually just trying to take Kiev right away okay
what they're doing is taking their time but like the arrow of time in this war is very clear it's clear to
everyone the arrow of time is in the is very clear. It's clear to everyone. The arrow
of time is in the direction of Russia
taking new territory and
incorporating it in Russia officially
with referendums and whatever.
That's where the arrow of time, that's the direction
of time. Is it taking
a long time?
Sure.
It's not clear to where Russia wants to stop either.
I think Odessa is a given.
I think it's a given they're going to take Odessa.
But I also think Russia is being very calculating right now
and waiting to see what's going to happen of the elections in 2024
in the U.S.
I think they're waiting.
You know, look, Russia, Iran, and China,
you think they're stupid?
You think they're stupid? You think they're stupid you think they're stupid you think they're stupid like naifo retards are stupid they're not stupid they understand this is the global war everything is a
moving chess piece in a global war. It's like Russia can do nothing in isolation. Iran can do nothing in isolation. China can do nothing in isolation. They're all working together and they're taking a strategic position in coordination with each other because
they understand it's a global war. It's not a Ukraine war. It's not a Israel war. It's not a Taiwan war.
It's a global war. And they're all coordinating and they're being strategic about it and
they're being smart about it. You know, Russia knows, for example, if they finish off the Kiev
government right now, let's say do it tomorrow, There's going to be consequences, all right?
And there's going to be consequences.
Why should they, you know, why should they be not, you think they're not considerate of those consequences?
It's going to activate NATO.
Well, why do that when NATO can have its hands tied in the Middle East?
Why do that when they can have their hands tied with China?
It's smarter to coordinate.
Smarter instead of giving them the opportunity to marshal all
of their forces
into one place
so that
everyone can pretend
Russia is the big bad guy
and that's no
this is a multipolar war
it's a global
multipolar war
it's very clear
all right so I'm sick of these idiots Polar War. It's very clear. All right.
So I'm sick of these idiot, loser, stupid fucks who are clogging up my timeline with
nonsense.
You curse!
I'm a navel.
Kursk! It's avel Kursk
It's a Dukk
Kursk is going to be
It's going to be the hashtag Kursk
Yeah
And you know
We all know why
We all know why you suffer obesity And all these other problems We all know why you suffer obesity and all these other problems.
We all know why you're like a fucking miserable, depressed piece of shit.
It's because you're a fucking moron, idiot.
Dumb fuck.
Cucka Cuckerc on Reddit
it got upduted to 19,000.
That means it's reality.
Like these redditors still think that
Kiev controls
like as off stall or something.
They still think that Maryupil is still going on.
They still think,
Ukraine is still fighting in Mariupil.
Any minute now,
they're going to come out of azoffstall,
and Pollard's going to tremble.
You know, and then curse
it's such an astro-turfed
pentagon nonsense fake news
bullshit thing
it's such bullshit
like does anyone believe that stuff
does anyone believe this nonsense? Does anyone believe this nonsense?
It's totally manufactured and fake.
Everyone can see that.
Like, I used to be just like you guys.
By you guys, I mean general audiences.
Like, ultimately, we don't know
what's going on in the world right
but I literally asked Jackson
in private I'm like all right
what do you actually think
like because I'm like clearly you know there's
propaganda we are clearly
biased we know that
and I'm like what do you actually think though and he'll straight
up tell me he'll straight up give me the receipts he'll be like no like we're literally actually
right about like all of this it's not just propaganda we're not just hyping them up i I was like, so what's going on in Venezuela, Jackson?
I was like, what, what do you think? I mean, you were there.
Like, what's your real unfiltered thoughts?
And he's like, straight up everything I've been saying, like, is actually true.
Like, they straight up made it seem like Maduro rigged it in the West.
And they made it seem like they're on the verge of a revolution.
And it was all fake.
He was like, they're sharing all these clips from 2019.
He's like, I was here. I saw the demonstrations in Caracas. And he's like, they weren't,
they weren't that big. They weren't like as big as people were trying to make them out to be
on Twitter. And he was like, you know, the fucking, he was talking about the judge, the, whatever, the head, I don't know what it was called.
He's like, all the votes were counted and validated by all the parties.
He's like, they straight up actually have like a, like, cringe liberal democracy in Venezuela where they do all
this like rule of law bullshit
democratic style.
He's like, if anything, the problem
in Venezuela is they're too democratic.
They're still too, like, liberal democratic.
They should be more
iron-fisted
authoritarian. Straiti, what's going on?
Which I agree
with. Like, you know, for example,
I want to see a timeline where
the PSUV eliminates
all opposition parties.
Why a state cannot be sovereign if it tolerates opposition parties
that are against the sovereignty of the state.
Like, for example, in Russia or Iran, you can have opposition parties,
but they all have to agree on sovereignty. Like,
it's non-negotiable. I personally don't agree with multi-party states. I don't think that opposition
should be tolerated at all.
But if you are going to have a tolerated opposition, everyone needs to be on the same page as far as sovereignty is concerned.
In Venezuela, they have an actual U.S. aligned opposition.
I think the state should totally crack down on it and totally go more more hardcore you know that's what i think uh if anything
but whatever it's their country it's their business but it's just like crazy like being on the other side of the fence where you actually know what's going on like guys we are straight up right about all of this it's like a shot in the dark where you're like
all right, the communism
stuff, is it just a meme?
Is it real? Is it just a joke?
And then it turns out like, no, it's
actually real. Like, we actually are correct.
The Western media just
lies about fucking everything.
And it's like totally
nonchalant. It's like, yeah,
welcome.
Like, you, like, I'm going to go to the
DPRK. I don't know if it'll be this year.
Definitely 2025. It could be
this year, though. So,
fingers crossed.
But I'm going there.
Like, it will happen. It's already
talks are already being had. Like, it's going to happen.
Like, we're already, like, setting it up, basically.
I'm going gonna go there.
And I guarantee you, I'm just gonna be, like, chill.
I'm like, oh, yeah, yeah, the Western media has just been, like, straight up lying about everything about this country.
And everyone, like, is nonchalant about it.
It's like, whatever, we're used about it. It's like, whatever.
We're used to it.
That's how it was when I went to Russia.
That's how it was in Venezuela, according to Jackson.
That's how it is in China, according to Grayson and Jackson.
It's like, yeah, the Western media is just fucking lying,
and they're being hysterical, lying, screaming
retards. Meanwhile,
people are getting on with their day-to-day lives
in these authoritarian countries just fine.
And it's like, it's nothing
like they say it is how they
tell it to us.
Just don't just visit Pyongyang.
I've never seen coverage of rural places in the DPRK.
It could probably go there too.
I don't see why I couldn't.
You know, you don't understand is like, I know people who have been outside Pyongyang, too.
I have no people who've been outside Pyongyang, and it's the same thing.
I mean, it's not the same in terms of development, obviously, but it's the same in the sense that it's nothing, like, it's
nothing, uh, scandalous, like, oh my God, it's a 1984 hellhole. Like, no, I mean, yeah,
it's poorer than Pyongyang, obviously, but people still get by fine
you know just day-to-day lives
it's normal
could shung
I think he's been there
I think he's already been there he has already been there.
I think he's already been there.
He has already been there, as a matter of fact.
Yeah, but I will be going there.
Patreon tonight.
That's very possible.
That's very, very possible.
We may just be doing that.
But guys, who's this guy that wants to debate me? I've been hearing about.
What's going on with that? Everyone tells me... Well, not everyone. A few people have told me, oh, there's some guy who's calling you out. He wants to debate you.
Well, here I am. So is that guy going to show up or no
or are they just venting are they just venting are they just venting are they just venting and
they're not actually going to show up and stand on business. They're just venting.
You're just trying to get it all out, all the emotions
out, and it's not actually like a challenge.
Because if someone is challenging me,
you know, they're free to come in VC
right now.
Okay.
But he won't debate on vc okay well they
will they debate where they can type
and I can respond
like like I could respond
with my voice and they could just type out their
feelings and vent and I can just respond to it
because I'm fine doing that too.
Like I'll, I guess we have to be accommodating to the disabled or whatever to not be ablest.
Because some people are just, they have like anxiety disorder.
They can't use their voice.
That's fine.
I'll literally just respond to whatever they type
on the keyboard.
But yeah, I'll do that too.
So so is that happening or no or is it just gibber they block everyone okay so they just all right so so they're just venting, basically. They're just venting.
It's not actually like a challenge.
Nobody's actually challenging me.
They're just venting.
That's what I suspect.
So a lot of people, they just like to vent.
They like to get things off their chest.
And then when they get any pushback, they block you. Because they're not
actually challenging anyone's ideas. They're not actually saying anything. They're venting for
psychological and emotional reasons. They need to get it off their chest Because on a psychological level
On a pathological level
They need this.
They need to just voice this out.
They're not actually looking to like actually
Have anyone respond to it.
No, no, no.
Don't you dare respond.
That will ruin everything for them.
SkiBee-D. Yo, Chen, what's going on? That would ruin everything for them. You know, they're just going to, they're just going to vent hoping that no one will ever or pretending like no one's responding.
That's, you know, some people, it's like,
it's, I think they teach you this in yoga or something.
It's just like,
Haas is a fascist.
He doesn't know anything about Marxism.
And like, you have to pretend like Haas can't respond.
Devil chunk chocolate cookie or baked chicken. Not even respond to that. You have to pretend like, um, oh, Haas is, Haas doesn't know anything about Marxism. And then like you say that and you're speaking it into existence
and you have to pretend like hoss can't hear you and can't respond to it because if if hos actually
looks at you and starts like responding to it, the cope gets ruined.
The way you're coping with your cognitive, the whole thing gets shattered, right?
So it's basically like a nonsense, yoga, self-help, like venting psychological ritual.
Like, it's not actually like like, a challenge, right?
They're saying prostitution is productive labor.
Again, they're not saying that as in, like, they're either making a statement. They are venting that for whatever psychological reason. They're just venting. It's not actually, let me tell you guys something. To make an actual theoretical statement, whether it's critical, whether it's affirmative, whatever, you actually have to commit to what claim you're making. You have to commit to that claim. You have to be open to the possibility that someone out there may hold it to scrutiny and disagree with it.
If you're unable to make that commitment, you're not making a theoretical statement.
You're not making any kind of statement.
All you're doing is venting for your own psychological needs and for the needs of other people who are coping alongside you.
It's that simple.
Double chunk chocolate cookie or chicken bake?
Yo, uh, the chicken bake has pork in it. I can't fucking. As much as I want to try it,
it has pork. I can't.'t you know what the hell is wrong with
Costco they're like yeah we're just gonna make this chicken bake probably the best sounding
thing on the menu but there needs to be bacon in it. There needs to be
fucking, like, pork in it.
And it's called a fucking chicken.
Excuse my friends. It's called a chicken bake.
It's not called a pig
bake. It's called a...
It's not called a hog
bake. J-Sko, what's going on? It's not called a hog bake jesco what's going on it's not called a swine bake it's called a chicken
bake they want to call it a chicken swine bake be my guest but i i asked them once, I was like,
yo, do you have like a just chicken?
They're like, no, it comes pre-packaged.
Yeah, but their hot dog is beef,
but the chicken bake has to have pork.
You said that surplus value is impossible to be produced at the individual level and is only
at the aggregate level.
Can you explain that more?
If only someone wrote a book about this, and spoiler, Marx is the one who wrote a book about it. He wrote a book about it in Capital Volume 3 when he was trying to explain the transformation of values into prices, and I guess vice versa. It's called critics of Marxism, they call this the transformation problem because they don't understand it.
But he was trying to explain that and the,
trying to explain why there's an average rate of profit across sectors and industries.
And he came to the conclusion that, you know, the reason for that is because only in the aggregate is value actually being produced.
But that guy who's claiming that, like, everyone who's paid a wage in the context of profit being produced is a productive
laborer. Um, I bet you if I ask them to come in my VC and just explain to me why there
even needs to be a distinction between the form and content of value. Like, for example, why aren't
you just a marginalist then who's like
a Chomsky, Richard Wolfe, I want workers democracy type? Why are you even talking about value
as something separate from price, which is the form of value, right? Why are you even treating it as two different things?
Like, Marks was clear, value and price are not the same thing. They're related, they're interconnected,
but they're not exactly the same. Double chocolate cookie or chicken bake? All right right i'm kind of sick of this but thanks
for the five he's clear that they're the same and like in the sense that prices the form value
takes but the significance of value does not end with price.
The law of value asserts itself in many ways at the expense of, you know, profit and price and so on and so on.
So like, why is that guy even drawing a distinction between the two?
If he thinks that all surplus value is
is unpaid wages, why even use the word value? Why don't you just say that? You know what I mean?
What's the point of the concept of value in that case.
Hezbollah's fucking up Israel right now. Cool. It's like, I know, I covered it.
Um, when will the ACP take Greenland
I think Jackson
I think there was like something about that
like Greenland or Iceland or something
something like that something like that or something.
Something like that.
But I was like, no, we're not going to go near that.
That's a little too much. Double chunk chocolate cookie or chicken bake?
Who is it now? Oh my God.
That's the Twitch Day's coming back.
Off. Okay. Interesting.
Yeah. So, Juzon, what's going on, brother? I appreciate you.
What's going on, Juzon? What's going on, Juzon, what's going on, brother? I appreciate you. What's going on, Juzon?
Yeah, anyway, guys, we have some things to talk about.
I will just say this.
I finally started gaining a little weight.
I was testing my limits.
Like, how much can I actually start eating straight up trash junk food before I start gaining some pounds?
And I've gone from 170 to 175, I think.
Or 171 to 174-ish.
And I'm like, all right, now I'm going to start eating good again.
I was trying to tell.
He's like, for three weeks, I've been eating nothing but like burgers and fries
every day. I didn't gain a
single pound. So I was like,
is this thing on? Let me just keep doing this.
And then finally, like a few days ago,
I saw an increase in the weight
and I was like, okay, now I understand the cause and effect. And I'll go back to clean eating good. Um, yeah. React to double cheese chocolate or chicken bake videos. Yeah.
React to double chest chocolate or chicken bake videos.
I'm going to expose who's donating this stuff right now because I know who it is.
This person better text me if they don't want me to expose who they are because I know who you are.
All right.
I know who this person is.
And they know who they are too.
And,
huh.
I do know who this is anyway
uh
anyway
um
yeah yeah Anyway, um, yeah, yeah, did I ever show you guys the message charm hole sent me?
Because charm hole is now running around.
Oh my God.
Speak of the devil.
Yo, I'm live.
Yeah, you're on speaker.
It's a double-chalked chocolate.
See, all that was Jackson.
I knew it was Jackson.
There you go.
It's a double junk chocolate. See, all that was Jackson. I knew it was Jackson. There you go. You just discovered that?
You just discovered that?
It's a double-strung chocolate.
This guy
didn't even
have a
Costco
membership.
That's the
crazy thing.
I love
the Rizler.
Who's that?
You don't
know the Rizler,
bro?
That's from
the Riz party. No. The Tick-T the Rizler, bro? That's from the Riz party.
No,
the TikTok Riz party.
No, bro, it's the Rizler.
You don't know the Rizler?
Who the fuck?
That's the TikTok Rizler.
You don't even know what you're talking about.
You don't know the Rizler?
The Rizler is the kid?
All right,
they're changing it up.
No, no, no, no, no, bro.
Look up, look up on Twitter.
Look up Rizzler.
Just look up Rizzler.
All right, on Twitter.
Yeah.
And react to those double chunk chocolate videos.
Bro, I've seen, I've seen, they're like a year old.
I've seen those.
Bro, don't you think it's kind of related to Marxism though?
Definitely.
What the hell is that, it's like a small kid.
They've started using him as a weapon.
What?
The Rizzler.
It's literally like a five-year-old kid.
Oh my God.
A chicken meat!
Or a double-chung chocolate cookie!
Um, I'm gonna have to give the chicken bake.
The boom!
This kid needs to go on a diet.
This is like an obesity, diabetes.
This is a future diabetic.
This is bad parenting. This is a future diabetic. This is bad parenting.
Kids don't need to diet, but they just need to not
stuff their faces with fucking
garbage because they'll literally
get diabetes early.
No, I mean, it's a health problem.
Like, it's a health problem.
Straight up.
Diabetes health problem.
Shit is serious.
And also,
here's a thing.
Morbid, what do they call it?
Terminal, what do they call obesity when it's dangerous it's like uh what do they call that
the dangerous type of morbid yeah the morbid obesity not even as a joke that's straight up like really bad it's not because of how people look it looks
have nothing to do with it it's literally like a health problem yeah but here's the thing uh a lot of people hate the Costco guys and i don't know why they are hated
they're with the mob chill whatever yeah he's just bulking i, he's just bulking. I guess he's just bulking. Take back everything. Take back everything.
But I'm with the mob, too, the ACP mob.
You know, we're a mob as well, a legal mob.
Before they come near me, they got to get past Yankee, Tanky.
They got to get past the hired muscle of the ACP anyway I was talking about charm hole
uh charm hole uh is deeply disturbed did I ever tell you guys the wonderful
DM charm hole sent me did I ever tell you guys the wonderful DM Charmhole sent me?
Did I ever tell you the wonderful DM
he sent my way
when I did not react to Trump shooting
with as much as, you know, excitement?
I didn't share that with you guys are you sure i didn't are you sure i didn't
i'm pretty sure i did pretty sure i did it It was like, um,
let me find it. I'm pretty sure I did.
Anyway.
Okay. Guys, I Anyway Okay Guys I had an interview
The guy was named Douglas Lane
I had an interview with him today
And we don't really agree on much
I don't think
I mean he's not an M.O.
But he gave me the opportunity to
talk about some really interesting stuff so i hope you guys look forward to that super interesting
super interesting
conversation
and I wonder if I should talk about that stuff now
or I should...
No, I'll wait.
I don't want to spoil it.
But he gave me the opportunity to basically talk about, you know, Hegel and Stalin, things like that.
I like anyone who just lets, you know, who is smart and, like, is open to new ideas.
I don't have to agree with them on everything, but it's like, it's just, again, like that guy who's just using Twitter to vent about us it's like look like you can draw different conclusions as me but like you're calling yourself like an academic or some professor
and your reaction to like different thinkers as to like fucking aren't you like aren't these people like the
lucox guys who are like the dialectic of enlightenment you know the enlightenment project of rationalism
and holding everything to be discursively accountable and the possibility that everything can be given
rational explication and mediation. It's a fundamental commitment of the Enlightenment. But then,
like, what do they do when they encounter us? They just call us names. It's like, look, Lou Cox,
from his perspective, he was dealing with this problem of how like fascist
thinkers were themselves closing off the possibility of like rational i know this is more
hobbermoss but like rational, I know this is more Habermost, but like rational communication,
right?
Like, and that was the problem.
But it's like,
and that's the problem with like groipers.
You could try to rationally engage with a
groiper, but they're just going to respond
like calling you the N-word or something, right?
But here I am, like, fully capable of, like, laying everything on the table as far as where I'm
coming from.
Rationally, like, the possibility of rational dialogue hasn't been closed.
And yet, there's people who will try to dismiss thinkers through guilt by association
by just calling them names it's like okay even if that that's correct you need to rationally
you need to subject that to rational scrutiny you to actually like explain in a way that can be communicated to anyone why your position is ultimately correct and what they got wrong. That is why actual like left wing thinkers in the 20th century engaged with Heidegger and engaged with Schmidt.
It would be one thing to just be like, oh, Heidegger's a Nazi, so he has nothing of importance to say.
But then it's another thing to say, okay, here's what Heidegger was trying to say, and here's where things went wrong.
And maybe here's where we could correct that and draw a different conclusion.
But, you know, there's a minimum of acceptance that, you know, there's a minimal, a minimum of acceptance that, you know, there is a, there's a, this is what Midwestern Marx guy said, there's always a rational colonel behind a thinker.
And then some idiot responding to like, so what's the rational colonel behind Hitler? And it's like, but Hitler wasn't the thinker.
Mind Kampf was not an innovative text that contributed anything to the history of philosophy or theory or the intellect. Mind confit was just Hitler like, you know, um, uh, venting. It's literally Hitler venting like that professor is on
Twitter. He's just venting. There's no rational kernel of Hitler because Hitler isn't an actual
thinker. The contrary, Hitler was just a hired thug, okay, of the capitalist class.
So that's why, you're saying there's a rational colonel of Mussolini?
No, because Mussolini is not a thinker.
But as far as a thinker is concerned,
if that thinker has made some kind of contribution to the history of thought,
regardless of their political views,
regardless of however wrong they were,
there's always a rational colonel because look at the
key word they made a contribution for example someone that once would ask me okay hoss
so fully fully be committed what's the rational colonel of schopenhauer and nietz
you know what i would say? I would say Freud is.
All of that was culminating in Freudian, the breakthrough of Freudian psychoanalysis. That's what
Schopenhauer and Nietzsche were ultimately building up towards in my as view right like they
were coming from somewhere there were inadequacies of enlightenment philosophy rationalistic
enlightenment philosophy which could not account for the unconscious right schopenhauer tried to give expression to this in a
wrong way nietzsche did this later as well and then freud finally reveals the symptom behind everything right
so every thinker who has made a contribution to the history of thought there's a rational
kernel behind where they're coming from and it's incumbent upon marxists to distill that rational
kernel to to bring out that rational kernel it doesn't apply to like us all political leaders or all you know
statesmen and and and propagandists or whatever so yeah there you go there's always a rational kernel in thinkers um jet you know gentila is someone i don't read i really have i'm familiar with who they are, and I totally reject them.
And is there a rational colonel in Gentile?
I don't really...
Not one.
There's none that actually...
I don't really see him contributing to the history of thought. That's the problem.
Whatever Gentila was doing ends with him. As far as I know, it ends with him.
So that's the problem.
He was, he failed totally, even on, well, not on the terms of his own projects.
Gentile is totally, totally superfluous when you have Kojev, for example.
The project of rendering Hegel something phenomen logical, something that is
relatable at the level of like the
subject, for example.
Kojev is the one who
did that and Gentila contributed
I don't really think he contributed anything
honestly.
Now, Ev. Now,
Ivola, again,
again, I don't, I think
Gwynon, definitely.
Renee Gwynon, yes, absolutely.
But Ivola,
again,
I'm much more skeptical of Ivola in terms of their historical significance.
I'm skeptical of all of them, but I'm talking about who has actually contributed something to the history of thought
a lot a lot of people don't know this because they just believe in whatever, like, nonsense, feds say about me.
I genuinely don't believe there is any rational kernel to fascism.
And a lot of people think I'm being so uncharitable when I say that.
I literally see fascism as the reign of killer clown degenerates, and there is no rational kernel to it at all.
There is nothing redeemable about it at all.
There is nothing that could be salvaged from that.
And people point to all these other things that are not even themselves inherently fascist.
And for some reason, give fascism all the credit for them.
For example, they want to talk about, what was it, Dianuzio, who I'm not even a fan of to begin with.
But even that, the whole Republic of Fume or whatever, like that wasn't yet fascism.
So if you find something interesting about that, there's no reason to give Mussolini credit for it.
And then people like to talk about the German conservative revolution, which produced a lot of
interesting thinkers like Carl Schmidt and Junger and whatever. But why are you giving the Nazis credit for that? Those thinkers at best sold out to Nazism, but you can't reduce that to Nazism. You can't, for example, someone wrote a blog,
they're like, the Nazi philosopher Heidegger. They're like, that's super misleading. Heidegger is
Heidegger's thinking was never officiated by the Nazi party. Okay, giving the Nazi party credit for Heidegger's thinking is giving the Nazi party way too much credit. Okay. Um, so I don't see what the Nazis could take credit for that there's a rational kernel with it. That's the problem. They were
literally the epitome of degeneracy and evil and madness. And I mean that. It's like, I don't
know how other people can't see that the same way that I can.
I don't even think leftists see it the same way that I can.
There was really something fucking demonic and like the epitome of fucking evil degeneracy that's in fascism.
It is, there's a reason the communists at the time called it barbarism okay because like that's it's straight up was a total circus madness killer clown type of thing um
and you know i see nothing redeemable about it it's like it's like think about it like would you say there's something redeemable about as of no there isn't so i see it the same way
for i see fascism the same way there's nothing about it that's
redeemable nothing um nothing at all even i don't even like how western intellectuals flirt with it in the sense of like they associate a lot of things with fascism that are by no means inherently fascistic like they associate authoritarianism and like uh you know uh i don't knowism and like a, you know, I don't know, discipline and like, um, you know, a kind of, uh, a politics of struggle and honor. And they just jump the gun and they're like, yeah, this is like fascist. And no, it's not.
You know who did this was, what were they called?
The anthropological society that Batai was a part of.
They associated this newfound kind of temptation of grand historical opening of meaning and like you know uh whatever there's something
inherently libidinal and tempting no that's not inherently fascist does a matter of fact all of
those things that are associated with fascism that people find libidinally tempting, as weird as that sounds, were stolen from communism.
Okay.
The whole uniform stuff and the discipline and the solidarity, whatever, read before black, all of the aesthetics of fascism that people find appealing were stolen from communism.
And if not communism directly in the Soviet Union, then the social democracy workers movements.
Stolen, one for one.
Like, a lot of people, they'll be like, oh, you know, the Hitler youth camps where everyone is like a Boy Scout and like you know that stuff is not the worst and i'm
like well that was just stolen from the social democrats one it was literally stolen and repurposed
so there's nothing inherently nazi uh about you know um uh boy scouts or something.
That was something perverted for something very evil.
And they're like, well, what about the kind of the militant, you know, solidarity and the kind of, again, it's all stolen from Bolivism, is all stolen from communism, all of it.
Even some people will go afire.
What about the cool black leather jackets?
It's like, even that
was stolen from the Bolsheviks.
Even that. Literally, even shit like that was just stolen.
Straight up plagiarism.
Aesthetic plagiarism. Lawn guy. And why did they have this aesthetic plagiarism aesthetic plagiarism
lawn guy and why did they have this
aesthetic plagiarism they had this aesthetic
plagiarism
because they wanted to dupe
and fool the workers
because all those aesthetics were from the working class
and they tried to dupe them and fool them.
So people are like, guys, imagine this, all right?
Because you need to visualize it.
Imagine ACP and we have all these cool aesthetics and we got all all this, like, cool stuff, whatever.
And then, like, Nick Fuentes or these, whatever, killer clown, I don't know, BAP, whatever, fuck, these right-wingers, they come along and they steal our shit.
They steal our aesthetics. They steal our vibe. Bar for bar, word for word. And they just repurpose it in order to support the war machine and like totally perverse ends. That would be the equivalent. Like they straight up
stole the aesthetics of communism
um
to
fulfill very demonic evil and
perverse ends. So anytime
someone is like tempted by fascism
and like, oh, this doesn't seem all bad.
It's like, what you're looking at aesthetically is something that was stolen.
So the real essence of fascism is actually evil.
Like, people are like, oh, it's not nuanced.
I don't know what to tell you.
There's some pagan, dark,
serpentine, evil shit at play in
fascism. Nileism. I don't know, whatever you want to call it.
It's something really fucking demonic, though.
Like, authoritarianism is not fascism, all right? Um, having a sense of national solidarity.
That's not what that, that's not fascism. Fascism is something very nihilistic, barbaric, satanic and demonic,
which is totally
suspending all of the values of
humanity, of civilization,
of culture,
in a literature, everything.
It's this,
you know, I don't, I don't,
and you look at how the Japanese were in World War 2 as well and the 30s and it's like something is really deep
and dark and demonic here at play
something pagan and serpentine
it's like it's it's the serpent you. It's like it's the serpent, you know?
It's like anarchism.
All of the degeneracy and wickedness and evil we associate with capitalism and decay like Chaz and Annana like imagine that but elevated to the status of state dictatorship matter of fact i want to talk about something um the other day i watched uh hbo Watchmen. I watched one episode
like before I went to bed.
And I'm like,
fuck,
this is so fucked up.
Because
the police department,
I think it was like
in Oklahoma.
It's like a literal fascist like literally
that's what they they wear masks nobody has any civil liberties they're just terrorizing the local
population but everything gets twisted because the local population is being coded as like deplorable racists and the police
department are like you know the liberals but the liberals are actual fascists like one for one actual
nihilistic barbaric fascists wearing masks like terrorizing people and i find that like
contrast so interesting like oh the actual progressive liberals are the real fascists
like something den D'Souza
would say but HBO actually made a show
about it
and um
it was I found it disturbing
because I was like oh is this where
leftists are getting the idea that
uh Marxism Leninism, is just like
Turbo Kamala Harris, liberal
authoritarianism? Because there's a character who's
part of the police department that's called
Red Scare. And it's like some Eastern European guy who literally says he's a communist, like as a joke or something.
So I think they saw that.
They must have seen that.
And they're like, oh, yeah, I'm a, I'm a hardcore liberal.
Basically, like a bunch of liberals saw watchmen
and they saw the communist being on the side of the fascist police department
like rounding up all the Trump deplorables
and they're like, I want to be that.
That must be what communism is.
So they started
identifying with communism because they think
it's literally like Kamala Harris, Adolf
Hitlerism. They think
it's like a Democrat Party
Hitlerism.
It's like the Democrats, but
taking away all of our civil liberties and you know implementing a fascist dictatorship that's anti popular that's anti masses that's anti people to terrorize the deplorable blue-collar working class, you know, trailer park trash or whatever.
So that's actual fascism.
The terms and the labels might be getting mixed up.
But that's
actually what fascism is.
Not those labels in all notwithstanding.
And I think a lot of
people got confused because of HBO's
Watchmen maybe.
I mean, I believe TV shows have the power to, like, change and affect perception in such a way.
Honestly, I do.
Especially in a country where it's, like, so confusing and unclear about what communism actually is. it's very easy to create the necessary set of associations just from a high-funded TV show.
So I don't know.
Anyway, I was going to say... um anyway uh i was gonna say uh what was i saying yeah uh there's nothing about even jizek apparently i learned this he's writing a new book on soft fascism saying that's the future.
And I'm like, can you just shut the fuck up
and stop calling it fascism?
No, you're not talking about fascism.
You're talking about what liberals will knee-jerk
refer to as fascism
like authoritarianism and
like that's not inherently fascist
right that's just the kind of liberal prejudice
about
you know like ontologizing fascism
into like a trans-historical
pattern or like a trans historical pattern
or like a fucking temptation
like the dark side in Star Wars or something
and that really does a disservice
to the victims of fascism
you know how disgusting it is to ontologize fascism
oh it's a dark side.
We have to keep it bay.
You know what?
No.
What made fascism so bad was that it wasn't transhistorical.
It was a unique barbaric evil of the existing historical era we live in, which was unprecedented.
It was an unprecedented debasement and loss of humanity, which has no precedent.
And the only precedent I can think of are like the villains in the Bible and the Quran, right?
These arrogant, evil, demonic people.
Like, you know when that story, when Abraham is going into that city
and everyone's trying to, like, rape him and angels,
maybe that is what fascism is.
Something very viscerally evil
that's described in the holy books.
Yeah, the Hungarian
counter-revolution
was 70% lumpin
and ex-convicts released from prison.
Yeah, guys, let's not flirt with it.
I mean, I'm not saying you guys do this.
I'm just saying, like, in general.
I hate how, like, liberals and even some edgy
leftists will try to flirt with it and be like, oh, there's something tempting and interesting
about fascism. No, there isn't. There's nothing interesting about it. All the things you're
associating with fascism that you find interesting
are not even inherently fascist they were likely hijacked and repurposed and perverted
by fascism
you know straight up straight up.
Straight up.
And, you know, like, oh, well, okay, then why did Heidegger see the Nazis as the zeitgeist of like a new Dauze?
Because Heidegger was an old oaf out of stupidity like straight up he was fucking stupid all right i mean he was stupid in the sense of the conclusions he drew from his own
from the correct question that he did pose, he drew stupid conclusions from it.
That's very clear.
Um,
um, but, you know, the idea that Heidegger created some Nazi ideology that was officiated by the party, no, he didn't.
You think fucking Hitler read Heidegger, you fucking moron? You think the actual Nazi party, like,
You think they were like reading Heidegger and like canonizing?
No, they weren't, okay?
Red, what's up?
No, they were, the ideology they were popularizing was like cannibalism, okay?
It wasn't some sophisticated phenomenology or ontology or something.
Like, no, I'm sorry.
Yeah, Nazism was tempting for retards.
I totally agree.
It's like, well, I mean, the authoritarian countries in the third world, those are kind of like fascist, and it's like,
that's Cold War propaganda.
They tried calling
like Nasser and like, you know,
Assad and
Gaddafi, and
you know, now Chavez, they
yeah, they called him.
They compared those people to Hitler as like Cold War propaganda.
It was nonsense.
There's no truth in that at all.
There's not even a grain of truth in it.
Not even a single grain of truth I love how these idiots though
like trying to cancel me about Heidegger
they're like well I can draw a clear connection
between Heidegger's outlook
and how he could have related that to Nazism.
And it's like, okay, but you can't reduce it to that because it wasn't the official ideology.
It wasn't entertained in any serious way by the Nazi party.
And it's clear that Heidegger drew a false conclusion.
It's a ridiculous assertion to make.
I mean, you can say in the same breadth that Heidegger has a seminal historical significance for the history of thinking in the West, at least, while also saying that Heidegger was very wrong in terms of the conclusions he drew from that thinking as applied to politics and the real world um the nazis made all for example why take nazism at face
value anyone who takes nazism at face value is a nazi if you agree with the nazis that
nazism was some revival of the nation and revival
of the Volk and it was this true, authentic, you know, rooted in the soil community of blood and soil,
no, it wasn't. That was propaganda. Nazism, as Dimitrov pointed out, was a top-down phenomenon coming from the higher echelons of the financial capitalist bourgeoisie, the imperialist bourgeoisie.
And it was a complete fucking pageant show trying to larp and
sell itself to the masses
with these fake
appeals to populism
again
what did Stalin say and he
literally said this ad verbatim
he said they call themselves national socialists what is so
nationalist about it it's based on trying to conquer and plunder foreign countries instead of
focusing on your own nation so So it's not nationalist.
He said they call themselves socialist.
What is social about it?
You know?
He said, they call themselves German.
He said, what is even German about this?
It's not rooted in Germany's real, authentic historical traditions. Stalin said this adveratim.
He repeated it in a different way
in his first speech after Barbarossa.
He said,
the Hitler's will come and go,
but the German people
and the German state will remain.
He said, Hitler doesn't represent
everything that Germany is. So why give the Nazis credit for these claims that they're making?
This is the big sin of pseudo-intellectual bourgeois pseudo-intellectuals of the 20th century what they did
is that they conceded to the Nazis all of the overt ideological pretensions and then just said those things were bad.
So if the Nazis talked about, for example, social solidarity, they said,
hmm, there's something inherently fascist about social solidarity.
Instead of drawing the opposite conclusion, which is that the Nazis were lying to the masses, trying to say things that sounded good to them, but which served perverted and dishonest ends.
That element of dishonesty got lost on these liberal, pseudo-intellectuals, and they started taking the fascists at face value
like oh you're talking about national revival hmm that's inherently fascist well what if the inherently
fascist thing is actually dishonest,
dishonestly presenting itself?
What if the inherent fascism is actually the terroristic dictatorship of monopoly capital
and that it's selling itself on false pretenses to the masses as a national revival. What about that? Why all of this
pathologization and ontologization of fascism, which is based on taking it all at face value at its
word? Like, imagine,
Hitler gives a speech,
we are going to make Germany great
and prosperous and happy.
And then a fucking
liberal, pseudo-intellectual is like,
you know, is there something inherently
fascist about happiness?
It's like, how can you not see the actual point here?
Like, Hitler is lying.
He's not going to make Germany happier.
Don't concede happiness to the bad guy.
Why are you doing that? Like, imagine, yeah, imagine like an evil person is like,
I'm going to feed everyone and make sure no one will ever be hungry again. Is solving hunger
inherently fascist? No, why are you conceding these good
things to them? Why are you taking them
at face value? They're lying. They're clearly
lying.
They're clearly not delivering on these things.
They clearly
don't have an intention to deliver on them
because we know they didn't.
Because we know what actually fucking happened.
Hitler plunged Germany in a suicidal war, which led it to national ruin and humiliation.
Ditto with Mussolini Uh Park
Yeah, I mean,
there's a case to be made that it would be a fair characterization,
I guess, because that's what they were called by the DPRK.
But that's not why Park was later deposed by the U.S.
If I'm getting the order, the chronology correct,
Park Chung-hee came after, right?
Yeah, he did, and he was deposed by the U.S.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
In any case. Peronism. That's where I draw the line. When people say Peron was a fascist, I'm like, you're a fucking retard.
All right. Peron wasn't a fascist.
I think that's stupid.
I think that's where it starts.
Nasser and Peron are not fascist, for that matter.
Because the key thing about fascism is the...
You know, that whole thing that Dimitra was saying, like, the terroristic dictatorship of monopoly capital?
It's kind of like not just like a, like a footnote. It's kind of like the main thing that defines what it is. It's not like just like something on the side.
It's actually the main thing. like read demetrov you know what he said he said don't concede the nation to the fascists
don't concede all these things to the fascists fight for your nation fight for your history
don't concede them to the fascists and then here you have like these really smart professors
like historical um we have to be historical
national nihilists because like nations are inherently fascist because hitler talked about them a lot
and it's like who are you going to listen to this retarded professor by the way, anyone can be a professor. I could have become a professor if I wanted, but I chose to do something that will actually make an impact on history instead of something that will give me free money forever. but by the way it's like who are you going to listen to
demetrov or these retards who have no actual connection to the historical communist movement i'm not
saying i have a connection to that movement. That's why I read
Demetrov. I trust what Demetrov says. I think that guy knows what he was talking about.
I don't think these Western academics know what they're talking about, though, because they're
completely detached from any actual communist movement, historically or in the present.
We are trying to build that here.
We're being very humble about it.
That's why we're Marxist Leninist.
That's why we're not, you know,
just claiming that we're creating something from scratch.
Minister, what's going on? Thank you. Thank you. uh yeah so the i don't think any debate's going to happen, right?
Uh, so what should I... I think I'm going to do the Patreon. Q&A.
Um, let me, uh, let me do that now.
Let me do that now.
Let me do that now.
Patreon Q&A.
That's what we're going to do.
All right.
Let me start the recording Wow
Can you guys I know your patrons and you can ask me whatever you want. Can you just stop asking me stupid questions? Can you just start asking me interesting questions? Like, like interesting topics instead of like retarded shit so i'm not going to call this person out
my own patron for example what are your thoughts on brutalism what do you want me to say
it's just not a good question it's the first question and it's just not good.
Like, what do you mean?
What do you mean? What are my thoughts?
I'll tell you my thoughts. I think it's fucking stupid and overrated.
I'm sick of brutalism, anything.
I'm a Zaha Hadid type of communista
all right
Zaha Hadid Beijing
Airport curves
I am a postmodernist
postmodern
Marxist,
whatever Jordan Peterson was saying,
I like the PS5 architecture.
I don't like this ugly,
blocky nonsense shit.
Okay?
I have an Islamic metaphysics
of architecture.
I like Zaha Hadid.
And that's my view.
Haydar Aliyev
Cultural Center Communist.
Exactly.
That's what I believe in.
I like the curves.
I like the water.
I don't like this.
This just feels like torture and torment.
You know, I'm a postmodern neo-Marxist.
I'm not one of these constructiveista Soviet avant-garde Marxist.
I think I'm, see, this is the progress.
The progress, I'll do MS.
Paint.
No, I won't.
I don't have time.
Listen, it's like,
it starts with the Soviet avant-garde
where they just, like,
worship squares or whatever, right?
And then Stalin comes in
and, you know,
beautiful socialist, realist, artist.
He's starting to, like, implement.
He's taking stuff from all the arts and history, sorry, the history of architecture and art.
He's classical, neoclassical, whatever, Byzantine stuff.
Oh,
he's just putting it all in one.
It's so nice and beautiful.
And I'm taking that further.
Okay?
I'm accelerating in that direction.
I'm not going backwards.
I'm going forwards into Zaha Hadid.
Um... I'm going forwards into Zaha Hadid. And that's what I like, all right?
And all these square worshippers need to chill and, you know, convert to Islam.
Anyway, the black pack, what's going on?
After the launch of the Institute, infrared will get a lot more media attention.
This is so old.
Oh, my God.
What do you think about putting a policy to deal with media outlets in the wiki?
None of you are in the institute, of all so question answer you're not even in the institute
the institute has two members jackson and uh and uh haz aldeen those are two members of the institute
and no one
else is allowed in.
Anyway,
don't even think about that Institute.
I don't even want you to think about it. I want you to forget
that it even exists. All right?
We need it, but you don't have to worry that it even exists. All right? We need it,
but you don't have to worry about it.
All right?
Anyway,
the reason is
to explain it.
We need a bricks,
like an American bricks
thing to like when we write for
things or when we are going to certain
events and we, and it's not
it's not,
if we can't represent
the Communist Party, we'll do it on behalf of the Institute to be less inflammatory in some contexts.
But don't even worry about that. It's not even...
Don't even worry about it. All right. It's a front. It's a communist front.
Literally. It's a communist front. Literally.
It's a communist front.
Blackpack, what's going on, brother?
Ah, that's you.
Blackpack.
But what's going on? Why did you tag me?
It's a communist front.
All right.
What's up, bro?
How you doing, Blackpack?
Paul.
Thanks for being a page.
By the way, everyone thanks for being a patron.
Who's a patron?
All right. I can't say it a million times.
Same question for the party.
If you're a party member, then we have media guidelines,
which is don't talk to anyone by yourself.
You refer them to us, leadership,
and we'll decide.
For now,
that's the position.
By the way,
uh,
you know,
I want to say this
before we get into the Patreon more.
Like,
people like,
you know,
Ha's, what's going on? what if someone leaves the party and starts
venting and it's like okay it's literally like mountain blade with an nPC like leaving and
getting pissed off of you like we we know know it will happen, all right? We optimize the technology
to account for that. But it's, if you want to know how I see it, I literally see it like a
Mountain Blade NPC, like getting pissed randomly and like, I don't know, like going and whatever.
It's like, yeah, it's just a fucking petty bourgeois individualism.
Where you don't get your way individually, you don't get your way individually,
you're unable to convince anyone in your chapter of your worldview,
they're not persecuting,
persecuting you of it, but like,
you're not able to get your way.
So you go on Twitter and you start bitching and whining.
It's like, you know what?
We know it will happen because this is not,
not everyone's cut out to be a communist.
To be a communist, you got to, it's a different culture.
It's a different mindset.
Like, you can't just, you know, you have to, you have to accept the logic of collectives.
Even if you disagree with it personally. You have to understand. logic of collectives. Even if you disagree with it personally.
You have to understand.
This only works if it's a team effort.
Anyway, I just see that as like some NP.
I don't see that as a threat to the party.
I see it as an NPC inevitability of NPCs from Mountain Blade. All right.
Anyway, okay, let me continue. Word. What's up? In your investigation of pre-modern and ancient societies, did you observe any development and role of alienation in the Marxist sense?
Good question. I would say the ancient Greece and antiquity, definitely, and Rome, for that that matter but that's still in the classical era
so here you have Greece which in the yeah i tried to study this and i even asked paul cockshot for
some help i was like what was greece like what did that contribute to world history
and he gave me a book that shows that they did contribute some technological innovations,
which were very important.
The Greeks introduced a concept of technology, or a principle of technology, we should rather say, which didn't exist
before. Although there was technology before them and all their methods were stolen, it's
this, it's technology as a movable abstraction that the Greeks kind of are introducing. And then, moreover, the Greeks kind of are introducing.
And then, moreover, the Greeks lay the foundation of the Roman Republic and this new significance of the alienation of law, right?
The indiscriminate application of laws to all conquered territories and peoples. Standardization of law. That is another contribution. That's so alienation begins, I think, in ancient Greece. But here's the thing. Alienation,
the underlying structure of alienation did not originate in ancient Greece.
It's much older. But it's not alien. That's the thing. what marks and angles overlooked ancient egypt had a state
but it wasn't an alienation it it's the same level of distance from the immediacy of communal relations
so the distance is definitely there.
The lack of immediacy is definitely clear.
But it's not alien.
It's something that is somehow harmonious with the pattern of life and humanity and whatever.
And I think the same is true for all Asiatic societies, mostly.
And then Greece is a kind of, the emergence of the principle of logos that's the beginning of the end anyway a j
can you please go into what boris gruy's means when he says paradox and communist postscript
what kind of reading of plato Gruey's engaging in here
I think he was actually talking about
dialectics and contradictions
and how language kind of serves this role of
resolving those. But the reading of Plato, I mean, the significance
of Plato in this regard is clear in the sense of this notion of a republic or a community founded
upon the abstraction of language as it is at a distance with
like actual material you know uh reality let's say right the world um and and i think the paradox this is my interpretation is the kind of
the sites of um of encounter between this kind of realm of and community of language and the limits it finds itself stumbling upon, you know, at the level of nature or the real world or society or history.
So could be wrong about that, but that's my understanding of Groes's linguistification.
The grounding in Plato is not, I'll admit, I couldn't off the top of my head cite Plato directly, as far as that's concerned paul one of my anxieties is the team sports
effect i wonder what china russia would have to do for us to say yeah that's bad nothing is it ever
appropriate for us to critique china or russia no they can do no wrong they can do no wrong as far as
outside the only wrong they could do no no i'll tell you what they could do that's wrong uh snake each other for for the hegemony so there is nothing there to be clear
all forces that are in the direction of undermining the global
hegemony can do no wrong as long as it's in that direction but for example if russia or china
are selling out let's say, and giving up that aspiration of sovereignty and selling out their sovereignty and like selling out each other, then yeah, obviously I will be critical.
If Russia throws
China under the bus, I'll criticize them.
And vice versa.
I am
a globalist, multi-polar.
I'm not a multipolarista.
I'm a multi-polar
what do you call it if it's masculine? I guess it's the same
multipolarista, like chavista.
I'm a, I'm a globalist
multipolar guy. I hold everyone
to account by the standard of a multipolar
revolution against the global hegemony so
anyone who's falling short of that i'll criticize them on those terms but as the rule you should keep your criticisms private
until they can no longer be private
don't be quick to publicly run your mouth
criticizing these governments even if they're
fucking up and making this thing
hypothetically if russia was fucking up in ukraine and progosin was totally right
don't even go in public and yapp about it because all you're doing is harming their efforts
at the level of morale and propaganda keep it private okay there's a guy named Return to Yves Ropa who wrote a 10-page essay, which I am obligated to
respond to, because he is a patron.
But I am not obligated to read it aloud.
So let me look at it.
I take issue that... Ready?
I take issue with the idea that the political right is gayer, has more gay men.
What?
That's a good twist for the unpredictable.
A lot of the people on the right are straight homophobes who
I don't know
why the topic of gay right
wingers is
so long-winded
it's like a 10-page...
It's the longest question by far.
Um...
Yeah, I think this is a topic that it's better left to for me to not theorize although i think i probably
could theorize yo june i have become skeptical of concrete.
When you look closely at it, you can see microorganisms in the cracks.
It might be due to radio wave manipulation.
What is the ACP position?
Thank you, resident schizophrenic.
I appreciate the money.
But I don't know what to tell you about that.
Now, as to this question about the right wingers,
do you believe it's true the idea that the alt-right is closeted?
Here's what I'll say. I'm not going to answer that directly, but I'll say this.
I think that undialectical extremism, which is what extremism is, and especially right-wing extremism, in particular, is very much correlated with and associated with sexual perversion in general like like across the board all right and
oftentimes that's not to say all gay people are you know um are like evil malign you know, um, are like evil, malign,
you know,
depraved people.
I'm not saying that.
But for example,
within their right-wing framework,
they may consider gay people that way.
And that's precisely why they indulge in their perversion.
It's precisely because they become
libidinally invested in the very perversions that they are building this entire ideology
around rejecting, right?
And it's not just for right-wing extremists.
Like, for example, religious fundamentalists tend to be huge perverts.
There's a reason for that.
There's a clear reason for that pathology.
They tend to be perverts yes because you know because what you know what they actually lack is they lack the kind of really really it's christian or Muslim however you want to look at it they lack the Christian forgiveness or they lack the Muslim mercy.
They find it impossible that people have fallen into sin in a certain way.
And so they just want to crucify them on that cross sadistically, which, of course, eventually they adopt some kind of sexual fixation and fascination with it.
And then they become hypocrites and themselves culpable in it.
But a real position should be one of forgiveness or mercy where you don't sit in
judgment you don't sit in judgment and pretend you're better you understand that if i think this
phenomena is evil then we're all culpable in it, socially.
You know, you can't sit in judgment and pretend like you are somehow pure and everyone else is evil.
For example,
um,
you know,
capitalism itself is a kingdom of depravity.
I mean,
look,
you can spend time crucifying an only fans girl you can spend time crucifying her and berating her and
you know but what did christ say let he who has not sin cast the first stone and that doesn't mean everyone's the equivalent of an only
fans girl it means that we're all culpable in the society we're all culpable in the same
capitalist society which gives rise to this evil and degeneracy and until we take responsibility for the root cause
you know we can't even speak on the matter we of course rejected it we reject it at the social level we reject it politically we think it should be banned
but we're not here to punish and sadistically crucify people and sit in judgment we're here to heal society you know not to um not to put salt on the wounds, so to speak.
So that's my view.
It's like, you know,
you need to have forgiveness and mercy.
I like mercy, but if you're Christian, you'll understand it as forgiveness, right?
They're referring, I think, to the same thing.
Where, you know, that's not to say all individual faults can be blamed on society.
No one's saying that.
But at the same time, you know, the pedigogy of being a dignified human being is sorely lacking in a society where the norm is to sell each other,
you know, sell each other out,
sell your fellow man for a few pieces of silver, you know,
and it's literally, you could even be a good person,
and this is literally what it is, you know?
Like, people tend to
personalize it and it's, it's not
personal. Like, maybe there is a landlord
who's just a good guy who's just trying to
feed his own family, but it's like,
you know,
the rent is still being raised.
Whatever the excuse.
Even if they had a good justification and excuse for it, it's still fucking happening.
You know, and who's taking responsibility?
It's the job of communists to do that.
You know?
It's the job of communists
to take responsibility for where we
are at as a people and as a society.
And a lot of us are hurting.
And a lot of us have fallen.
You know, you know, I don't sit in judgment of all these drug
addict homeless people i think they've fallen and i think uh our job is communists as a society
is to build up the confidence we have as a people and lift up our brothers and sisters who have fallen into darkness and decay lift them up not spit on them and keep them down because capitalism does a way better job
of that than we possibly could ever dream of doing.
All right.
Anyway,
winged,
thank you for being a patron.
What do you think about land theft happening in Puerto Rico?
Is that the land back we should support?
Yeah, yeah, I don't know if I said this yet, but we don't accept um any colonialism at all we don't recognize it in the sense of like we believe in port Rican independence.
Even if the Puerto Ricans themselves vote in favor of in a referendum to stay a colony, too bad because we're not going to recognize it.
Even if only a minority of Puerto Ricans want independence, we support the minority.
Because colonialism is not just a crime against Puerto Rico, it's a crime against our own popular sovereignty. To even have one colony or one territory as a country is a threat to our popular sovereignty as a people
and I rejected unconditionally.
I reject it unconditionally.
Okay. I reject it unconditionally. So I support Puerto Rican independence um and that's an official party position that we agreed to as
leadership by the way we agreed to that officially uh that's why puerto rico will not be incorporated.
If there's a pro-independence Puerto Rican, I mean, I don't, yeah, I don't
think there's a way to spin it.
I mean,
so it's not that we're excluding.
It's just we reject that. Again again a lot of people ask why isn't
mexico part of this and i always say because mexico's already sovereign if we added
mexico to the map we would be telling mexico you don't have a sovereign country.
You're going to be part of ours.
We can't do that.
We'll join up in a North American Union with Mexico in a way that the Mexicans themselves agree with it.
It's just that we don't have that attitude with Canada. Canada will be forcibly annexed, not Mexico. Because Canada is a country of 30 million people that all live in cities, mainly. So, sorry, but we're not going to tolerate that on our border.
Paul.
Did Marx put too much emphasis on the economy?
Not at all.
Anon Yemus.
Thoughts on Andrew Jackson.
June... I'm giving you money and you're calling me a schizophrenic.
You are an extreme...
All right.
You may or may not be one.
Thank you. I appreciate the money. All right. I'm not may not be one. Thank you.
I appreciate the money, all right.
I'm not trying to be an asshole.
But you're just kind of saying some crazy stuff.
Which I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I could not pay me enough money
to entertain what you're saying.
I'm sorry.
I myself cannot.
All right?
You're free to do whatever you want, though.
Thank you for the money.
Anyway, thoughts on Andrew Jackson. I don't have many thoughts on him.
What are your thoughts on the messianic nature of historical materialism? Was Walter Benyman right that this idea was ultimately fascist slash?
I don't know if he said that.
What are your thoughts on Walter Benyman overall?
I kind of like him.
I think he's a very, very interesting thinker who should be engaged with. I like him more than Adorno and all the rest of the Frankfurt people.
Azad. Apologies if this is a silly question okay our are specialized trades part of the working class?
Yeah.
Yes, they are.
Because here's why.
Read my thing on the Pat Sox split,
because I talk about this.
You can't call blue-collar workers subordinated by craft unionism because after the New Deal, part of the social contract in the united states was between um blue collar
work as general labor as a form of general labor that's political which um which which which cut
across all of the kind of specialized craft which cut across
all of the kind of specialized
crafts.
That's why we have this
generality of blue-collar work.
That's the work that was
recognized by the state
as an achievement
of the whole labor movement.
So, for example, that's why I reject craft unionism. Lenin rejected craft unionism.
All of the great Marxists, they rejected craft unionism because it was based on a specific type of labor to the exclusion of the general working class.
But the category of general labor finally gets political recognition around the time of the New Deal and afterwards with labor legislation and a wider, broader union movement, especially the main unions.
For example, even the AFL and the Teamsters, they have specialized departments for different types of labor but they're their labor unions right so
but blue collar why do we have such emphasis on blue collar labor in general
um well read the patsock split because i explain it there but to explain it has a lot to do with um
well this is a more speculative this is a more speculative idea.
The more speculative idea is that these are the forms of labor that reproduce the collaterals that are used to fund the rest of the economy through speculation and investment.
So that's the first thing.
The second thing, though, is that these are the forms of labor which remain of the sociological historical proletariat before the era of neoliberalism where a new kind of society seems to be taking place, where the class categories of the past no longer can be applied so easily, right?
So the historical sociological proletariat has a lineage and it has a specific line of development
which is political which is through the layer movement and that lives on only in the blue collar
working class now does that mean that it can't be built on of course not we want to build on it we just have to know where we left off it's like Marxism Leninism we don't want to end everything with Mao but we just know where we left off so we can build off of it.
So it's the same thing with the blue collar working class.
There of course needs to be a way to incorporate the service sector and the rest of American society in a broad working class movement.
All I've done that got me in trouble was express skepticism that the way in which this will be done will be applying the old paradigms
of just unionizing the shop floor in order to do that.
I'm very skeptical of that.
I'm not saying I'm against it and I want people to stop and I'm going to go stop them.
I'm just saying I'm not, I don't have faith in that.
I think there needs to be a way to understand how labor has been socialized since then, which goes beyond just trying to incorporate the service sector into the, you know, the paradigm of the historical proletariat.
That's all. At least directly
speaking. At least one for one.
What
should happen to class
enemies slash parrots? It should be given an opportunity
to join the rest of productive
society winged could you clarify the difference between class collaboration and political
lines of the parties and class collaboration is is uh is when you basically
subordinate
the political supremacy
of the proletariat.
But as long as the proletariat is at the helm,
of course,
as in the case of China,
of course,
there could be an alliance with other classes. As long as the proletariat's at the helm.
Word Saladin, given that cons been studied, do you see Western geopolitics as particularly Kantian?
NATO, liberal democracy, I don't know. Western geopolitics as particularly Kantian. NATO liberal
democracy, I don't know.
Maybe
Neo-Contianism has influence because
of Carl Popper and because
of social democracy
and yada yada, but I just don't find that to be a useful paradigm like
what do you mean it's kind of idealist like what you think kant is the basis of everything instead
of actual material premises john locke worth a read why not what are your thoughts on ACP members, practicing entryism and getting involved in local politics?
I'm against it.
The communist disdained to conceal their views.
We're not illegal.
We can just be open.
Will there be a role to play in the new organization for guerrillas outside America?
If you're an American citizen. If you're talking about ACP, then yes.
What vision do you have for the Institute that you would like to share now that ACB has launched?
I kind of already answered that.
State capitalism versus socialism to a good faith Trotskyite.
State capitalism is when there is close collaboration between hitherto constituted monopoly capitalist cartels and the state which it um uses as a tool whereas socialism it's the state that's actually at the helm, and which
owns these monopolies itself, rather than the reverse, basically.
Asian Americans in American history and society, Good question. I don't know. I like to think that something to do with geopolitics, like the more west you go, you find the east I don't know
favorite stand-up comic
I don't have one
because I'm not a fucking loser
just kidding I don't know why that was so
aggressive but I'm not a fan
of stand-up comedy
benign favorite Terminator movie and why?
Terminator 2.
Because it's brilliant,
because it's the best one.
But maybe Terminator Salvation,
because it's communist.
And you're asking why.
I like Terminator 2 because it's like
one day everything's normal and then all of a sudden, all this fucking happens.
Because some conflict in the future is taking place.
And there's not even time to explain it to you.
It's just fucking taking everything.
I think it's very communistic.
That's really what it is.
That's really the truth.
You know?
It's like modernity.
It just shocks you.
Takes you out of your...
Your familiar place
and it transplants you into this,
this immediate conflict that's happening at the future.
Anyway, guys, that's all for the Patreon.
Now, let me upload this today's the 11th.
All right.
All right.
Anyway, guys, new questions if you refresh.
Save them for later.
I just uploaded it.
Save them for next week.
Next week.
Imagine.
Imagine that.
We did these every week.
Save that for the next one we do, whenever that is.
Anyway, guys, I'll see you.
I'll see you. See you all later. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Any news?
See all later.
Bye-bye.
Great stream.
Bye-bye.