INFRARED RENAISSANCE

Comrade Thomas with the five, what is up, man?

Appreciate you.

Johnny Castro, what's up, bro?

Phil Foe, what's up, man?

How you doing?

Welcome to the infrared renaissance.

Welcome to the infrared renaissance.

Welcome, everybody, to the infrared renaissance.

Welcome to the headquarters of the revolution of our time.

The infrared renaissance.

We're seeing beyond the visible spectrum.

Infrared is rising.

We are on the come up.

The energy is high.

I told y'all to trust the plan.

Just in the past weekend alone, we saw an explosion.

We back in the discourse, we back on top, we back rising, we back on the spotlight, we mobilize to get this shit through, we mobilize to get ourselves back into the game.

All the sun gorillas marching 24-7 on the clock.

I've been buried.

Rabbi Tier with the five.

What's up?

I've been buried in writing the esoteric tomes, proving the speculative identity, the truth.

Marxism is Islam.

Submit to necessity.

It's very, very simple.

I could talk more about it on stream.

I've been buried in the tomes, buried in the books, getting that shit done.

I'm writing it just for the love of the game.

I ain't doing it for money.

I could just sell that shit, paperback, 50 bucks.

I'm not going to do that.

It's going to be free.

I don't give a fuck.

That thing that I'm writing, it became more than 10K words.

It's for free.

Don't worry.

I'm going to just give it to y'all.

Distribute it to the world.

Everybody needs to hear this shit.

I just want to talk about something.

Since the last time I saw you, I gave you some infrared vision insight about what the fuck is going on in the country, right?

Not one day later, not one day later, not one within twenty four hours, Donald fucking Trump confirmed exactly what I fucking said.

He confirmed exactly what I fucking said, okay?

Down to the fact that the Democrats are too afraid to fucking do anything, right?

To stop this new momentum.

Truth Social

I'll show it to you directly.

He made a long post on Truth Social.

Talking about how the Democrats are not doing anything.

I told y'all, I don't bullshit, I don't lie.

You didn't see the vision.

You didn't see the vision, now, did you?

That was a mistake.

That wasn't a mistake.

For some of you, thought, oh, Haz, you're wrong.

This is just a psyop.

I'm telling you, Hassan Piker is doing Pregozhan's Rebellion right now on the Democratic Party, and it's a rogue thing.

The communists are finally making their move.

I've been waiting and preparing for this for a long time.

It's easy to be a commie, whatever, over thousands of years, idiot, whatever.

The game is on.

Enjoy watching.

Now, Trump, he's doing this.

I'll tell you exactly why he's saying this shit.

He knows the Democrats aren't going to do a thing.

He's aware that all the energy and the momentum is with the Zoron thing with the DSA right now.

And Trump, what did he say?

The game is on.

Literally, this is Hassan Piker's mutiny on the Democratic Party.

Trump is watching it and he's hoping.

That this is going to be his saving grace in the come up to the midterms.

That's what Trump is banking on.

He's banking on the idea that for the midterms, this is going to be the thing he's going to be able to count on.

Okay?

That he's going to call them communists.

He's going to lean on the communism thing.

And that's how he's going to defeat the Democrats, put pressure on them to get rid of the Democratic Socialists in their ranks and do that purge at the expense of potentially harming.

their prospects and their chances in the midterms.

And Trump knows that.

That's why Trump is going to lean on the attack on communism very, very aggressively and strongly.

And he's going to use that astroturf bullshit on X that said the Bolsheviks killed ten trillion Christians.

And it puts the Democrats between a rock and a hard place.

And granted, granted, you guys have to trust my judgment.

Hassan Piker, granted, he knows what he's doing.

He's leveraging that.

He's playing that game.

He knows the Democrats can't do anything.

Hassan Piker is making his moves.

Zaran and Hassan, they're working together with the DSA, and they are actually starting to defy the Democratic leadership, Democratic establishment.

And the game is on, like Trump said.

The DSA is gonna fail.

They're gonna explode.

We're gonna reap the rewards.

American Communist Party is up on the come up.

Don't you forget it.

Teepo with the eight.

People with the eight.

They want to restart the war on Christians and churches.

What?

And as you saw with the communists elected in New York City recently, they're communists, they're not social.

The war on Christians.

I'm so fucking sick of hearing this shit.

For the twenty f for the for the thirty years that I've been in this country, I've been hearing nonstop about a war on Christians.

America is a Christian country.

What do you mean a war on Christians?

You don't h you need to understand how retarded this sounds from someone who is not born in a Christian family.

How retarded these evangelicals sound.

I do not come from a religious Christian family.

So when I look around in America, everyone's Christian to me.

Like this is a Christian country.

That's just how it is.

That's how I see it.

Why do I see these evangelical retards randomly talking about how there's a war on Christians?

What do you mean?

Everyone's a Christian already.

Unless you're talking about the Jews, which I don't think you are.

Unless you're talking about the Jews, who are you like talking about?

Maybe I'm too sectarian.

Maybe I don't get it.

In Lebanon, you come from a sect.

You're Christian, you're Muslim, you're something else.

I see America as a Christian country.

So when I hear this self-persecuting retardation all the time about there's a war on Christians, Christians are under attack, bruh, by who?

Everyone's Christian already here.

Even liberals are Christian.

It's cultural Christianity.

Like, what do you mean this, like, there's an attack on Christians?

What does that even mean?

What are you talking about?

It's the biggest scam in the world that these con artists pull.

I've seen it for just about the 30 years that I've been in this country, I've seen it.

I've just seen I've just keep hearing this retarded thing.

Doesn't make any sense.

If you're talking about the Jews or something, okay, it's a little spicy.

But these people are not even talking about that.

So what the fuck are you talking about?

Who who is the people persecuting Christians?

Who?

They want to completely destroy the traditional American way of life.

Communism is very easy to sell.

It destroys everything, but it's very easy.

I'd be I'll be honest, I think I'd be the greatest Communist in history.

I give free rent.

Ladies and gentlemen, from now on you don't have to pay any rent.

From now on, anybody wants a house, don't worry about it, just pick the house you want.

Everybody gets free food.

Everything is free from this point forward.

Everyone's gonna vote for me.

The problem is, after two or three years, the country is a disaster area.

The country fails.

They always do.

It always does so easy to sell.

That first year, boy, you're the most popular, it's happening right now in New York and California.

But you'll start living in squalor.

You'll live in squalor.

There will be no food.

There will be no housing.

There will be no military.

There will be no law and order.

There will be no nothing.

There will be no nothing.

You'll be a third world inhabitant in every way, and everyone will suffer or die.

You'll suffer or die.

That's what happens.

For thousands of years, it's been happening by different names.

You see?

Thousands of years.

He said he knows the truth.

It's been happening for thousands of years by different names.

Guess who agrees with me on this?

Trump does.

He agrees it's been happening for thousands of years under different names.

That's what I've been saying.

He's just spelling out the self-evident truth right there.

I would be, I'm telling you, I'd be the greatest communist in history.

It would be so easy.

You wouldn't have to work.

You could stay home.

You need to appreciate the.

Every meme I breathed into existence was rooted in some grain of truth.

MAGA communism, it just takes off, becomes a life of its own.

Now, the Marxism equals Islam thing, that's going to explode.

And I it's a full frontal assault on all the Islamic LARPers and all of the new atheist Reddit Marxists.

I'm declaring war on both of those.

And it's like, this is going to be explosive.

Already, my brothers in Turkey are supporting me.

All I see all in my replies, it's all Turkish communists supporting me.

The Turkish army has my back on this full frontal assault on Gulf Islam and the understanding that Marxism is Islam.

Not simply compatible.

It is that.

The final revelation on earth.

Marxism is Islam, right?

So just stay tuned.

Just stay tuned.

I'll talk about it.

The problem is a couple of years go by, the whole place collapses.

Always does.

Always has.

But I'm sorry to say, but assassinations of those who oppose them is a very important element of their ideology.

Assassination is a big deal for them.

They're animals.

They're animals.

In many cases, they're not smart, but in some cases, they are.

He's talking about me there.

It's easy for them to get followers because they make promises that they know they can't keep.

Like what?

That I'll stream on time?

All right.

That's what he's talking about, by the way.

He's talking about that I'm going to start streaming at 6 p.m.

He's talking about that one.

All right.

And that's a really vicious attack from Trump.

It's totally out of context, totally unjustified.

And the Democrats aren't fighting back.

That's why they're dumb.

They're not fighting back.

They're afraid.

I watch Humor.

He's afraid to fight.

I watch guys that are pretty...

See how what he's saying lines up exactly with what I fucking told you the last stream.

He understands the situation.

That's how, you know, Trump is at least a little smart.

He's perceptive.

I made the same analysis.

He made the same analysis.

The reason the Democratic establishment isn't cracking down on this isn't because they support it.

They don't.

It's because they have no fucking choice.

They're too weak.

They're too old.

And they're too fucking scared.

That's the truth.

I made the same analysis.

Some of y'all still think that they're all just, it's all a Democrat PSYOP.

No, the Democrats are too retarded to pull off of a PSYOP like that.

Trust me.

And many of these people, I looked at some of the people that got elected the other night in New York.

These are, in many ways, stupid people, in some ways, and intellectually probably pretty smart.

But they're people that want to destroy our country.

They hate our country.

They hate our people.

They hate the Democrat Party.

The Democrat Party isn't.

You see, he's understanding.

He gets it.

There's a Hassan Piker mutiny against the Democratic Party.

And he is perceptive enough to see that this energy that's coming from the Zoron DSA thing, that's not a Democrat psyop.

That is a rogue, professional petty bourgeois rebellion.

And he's seeing that's like a brand new thing.

And we fucking benefit from it.

Don't be retarded.

We benefit from it.

Okay.

We benefit from this shit.

They are finally making their move to distinguish themselves from the Democratic Party.

Bernie wouldn't do it.

AOC wouldn't do it.

For some reason, I have to say, I've underestimated Zoron Mamdani in some sense.

I'll tell you, God honest, my understanding, my character assessment, my knee-jerk character assessment of Zoron Mamdani was that he's just a scammer who wants to climb his way to the top of the Democratic Party.

That could still be true.

He gives me those vibes.

But then I read a physinogamy analysis of Zoron on YouTube, and he's like, you have to divide Zoron's face into two parts.

Yes, there's one face where he's smiling all the time and shit, but it's inauthentic and fake.

And I'm like, yeah, that's true.

But then he's like, the other side of his face is a very vengeful, hateful person who wants to hide his intentions, but he actually plans on doing something very severe and dramatic.

And then I thought.

Interesting.

But now I'm seeing Zoron's going rogue, promoting these people to unseat mainstream Democrats.

What is my YouTube home page?

Oh no, is there some bullshit going on with my YouTube again?

I remember I got hacked before.

Bro, fuck you.

There's nothing wrong with my YouTube homepage.

Are you retarded?

Why are you talking nonsense?

Right.

Fuck you talking about?

Trouble because this isn't stopping with New York.

This is going all it's too easy to get elected, giving everything away.

Too easy to get elected.

Very dangerous.

But you'll soon have nothing left.

That's the problem.

In many ways they're allowing them to just go their own way, do your own

Zoron Mamdani is.

I don't like him.

I'll never like him.

And I'm not saying, oh, kudos, whatever.

I'm just saying, like, Zoron has bigger plans than I thought.

That's what I'm saying.

The sense in which I underestimate, like, he has bigger plans than I thought.

Clearly, he does.

He has bigger plans than I thought.

And it's a full-scale rebellion against the Democratic Party, which will fail for reasons we understand it will.

SYJ, what's up?

And then you guys are asking, well, why don't the DSA, why don't they just become a third party then?

No, because they're doing something really sneaky, okay?

They are using, like, it's Piker.

Piker, he's commanding this maneuvering to basically unseat Democrat incumbents.

And stay in the Democratic Party to be on the ticket, to potentially get the voter rolls, to get the funding.

But it's like a rogue strain that is at odds with the Democratic establishment.

DSA were the waterboys for the Democrats.

For the past 10 years, that's what they've been.

But now the Democrats have no direction, they have no vision.

They're very weak at the top, as Trump observes.

And now the DSA is bumrushing a takeover of some kind.

They're trying a rebellion, they're trying a takeover.

And

What we have to understand, guys, is the Overton window is being pushed.

Let's not delude ourselves.

Normies around the entire country are talking about Zoron.

They're interested in this new zeitgeist.

We see it for what it is.

We know that they're Zionists.

We know that they're bullshitters.

We know that they're weak.

But you honest to God, you want to know how I think and I want you to trust my infrared vision.

It's like you got these Barney the Dinosaur retard socialists, right?

They're literally naive retards, by the way.

They don't know what they're cooking up.

They're gonna keep going like this.

They have no idea that at the end of the tunnel it's a Hazaldeen.

They have no idea that what they're doing, they're empowering guys like me, crazy fucks like me.

They have no idea what they're gonna be unleashing if they keep continue down this trajectory.

If the DSA types, the Zoron types,

They're going to keep going down this trajectory and they're going to regret it eventually because the polarization is going to get to a point eventually.

The more the left distinguishes itself from the Democrats, eventually at the end of the line, it's crazy fucks like me that are waiting at the end of the tunnel.

That's honest to God, that's the truth.

We benefit infrared, ACP, like we are the beneficiaries.

Think about it.

Think about it.

Think about it.

Think about it.

Think about the Overton window and how it fucking works.

Yeah, you're going to go from democratic socialists.

It's not going to be long till they just start going, what about communism?

Now that we've accepted this is the center, you know, what about communism?

May as well go all the way.

Like, that's our real fucking trajectory.

That's the Overton window, right?

That's how it fucking works.

I'm not gonna sit here and be a retard and not benefit from this shit.

I'll be letting y'all down if I don't make sure we're gonna benefit from this shit.

There's a lot of energy in this country now.

People are changing their attitudes, even to the word socialism.

We need to get our foot in the door.

Communism.

We're gonna be there when the DSA fails when the DSA fails, we're gonna be there.

We have to have already been there.

Yellowstone with the five.

It's not that we're gonna be there.

It's not that we're going to be there.

It's that we have to have already been there.

As I told you last stream, we have to have been already there.

And at that point,

They're gonna.

We are gonna get turbocharged by this shit.

Prepare for a giant windfall.

ACP's already been going viral just today alone.

As Eddie came to Michigan, I've been buried in my scholarly philosopher stone shit with my beard, with my whatever.

I haven't even showered.

I've been buried in my tomes, my text.

I couldn't really hang out with Eddie all that much, honestly.

But I'll be, don't worry.

But.

Eddie posted the greenhouse, it's going viral.

Everyone's fucking talking about it.

Everyone's talking about the beekeeping thing.

We are in the discourse.

Everybody's talking about us.

I just saw I went viral again.

I've been irrelevant, man.

But now I went viral th th one of those uh

Millennial retard leftists.

I'm back in the discourse.

They got what, like 6,000 likes.

I'm back, bitch.

This shit is working again.

Infrared Renaissance in this shit.

That post that I just made: Marxism is Islam.

Oh my god, there's all like 150 quote tweets.

This is the infrared renaissance.

It's so easy.

I never remembered how easy it was.

You tap into exactly the things that just make everything explode.

And we're fucking back.

All right.

We are back.

And I'm bum rushing my way back into the discourse.

These DSA types, I want to tell you something.

Every step of the way of the growth of the DSA, they got to be seeing me.

They got to be seeing this globe.

They got to be seeing ACP.

It needs to be put front and center at them.

Every new person that joins the DSA is going to be confronted with us.

Because they're gonna be like, I'm gonna go research that and look it up on my own.

Oh, this DSA thing is interesting, but it's a little fucking boring and cringe.

You know how many infrared gorillas are out there?

Help the gorillas find us.

Help your fellow guerrillas find us.

There's a lot of them out there that are being put into the DSA pipeline now.

We have to take that pipeline.

All right.

And a lot of them are normies, they're cool people.

That's the type of energy we have to have, okay?

The country is going left wing.

It's a left wing direction in this country.

That's the zeitgeist.

The nation is going left.

And I did predict that would happen.

I did predict that would happen two years ago.

That's what I predicted.

I said the left is going to be on the come up and it's going to be a political realignment, okay?

We ACP American Communist Party

Our membership needs to fucking double, okay, quickly.

And you know from there it's exponential growth.

Infrared Instagram needs to get at minimum 20,000 followers.

Infrared YouTube at minimum needs to get to 100,000.

You understand?

Infrared TikTok needs to be getting to at minimum fifteen thousand.

Okay, these are modest goals.

These are modest goals.

Maybe I'll even go so far as to say goals that I want by the end of the year.

Maybe I'll suck my maybe, maybe, maybe I won't commit to it yet.

Maybe we'll say by the end of the year, that's the fucking goal that we want.

This shit's got to explode and take off, because this is the thing that's going to absorb.

All the energy, hype, and momentum.

We are on the fucking come up.

Do you understand?

And you got to be retarded.

You got to be retarded not to see how we're going to benefit.

We don't want to take a chance on saying anything bad because we're afraid we're going to lose our jobs if we do.

They're afraid they're going to lose their election if they even think about saying anything bad about this.

Since it's Trump trying to divide the Democratic Party, it might be successful.

It might not make a difference.

But I just want to tell you what he's saying.

It's no joke.

Communism is the greatest threat to our country since World War One World War Two.

Pearl Harbor or nine eleven.

You know what's funny about this shit?

Usually, when you say the greatest threat since something, you just say like since 9-11.

How can it be since World War I to Pearl Harbor and 9-11?

Am I discombobulating?

Like, when was the last time our country had a greatest threat?

It was 9-11.

So, how can you say World War I, World War II, you could say it's a greater threat than all of these things, but why is he saying since?

That this is the only since is nine eleven.

You can't say since world because you're saying nine eleven was a you know, which was the greatest threat?

Uh well, I don't know.

Grammatically, I don't know.

I'm not here to police grammar.

It's just kind of fucking retarded.

A little bit retarded, right?

We have a lot of con I mean, ACP has been being controversial.

A lot of controversy going on.

Because uh A C P Oklahoma is keeping bees.

They're just keeping bees, and they're talking about the dual power strategy, which is absolutely correct.

And let's check the quote tweets.

Surely no one's upset about beekeeping.

In real life, dual power more so involved machine guns and you call us LARPers, you fucking retard.

Things like political dual power require material economic foundations.

And sorry, we can't stomach our pride and sacrifice our sovereignty to get all of our funding from Soros, NGOs, and shit.

By the way, this is not even a monetized thing going on with these bees.

It's literally just the basics of having some root in your community, some good reputation in your community, so that in the process of attempting to build something like dual power, you're going to be a trustworthy...

Why do I have to explain shit to retards, right?

This isn't dual power, this is LARPing as petty bourgeois farmers.

You're you're just retarded.

You're just fucking retarded.

First of all, nobody they didn't even say anything that this is monetized.

Second of all, this is nobody's claiming this is the final realization of dual power.

It is a step in the direction of dual power.

Absolutely.

Does it contribute to building dual power?

Yes, it fucking does.

However, small that contribution is, of course, it does.

When the fucking central government is no longer relied on or it breaks down or becomes fully discredited somehow, people are going to look for alternative ways to fucking organize their lives, get food, and fucking have an authority to look to.

A step in the direction of preparing the foundations for something like that is shit like keeping bees.

I mean, what are we saying?

What are we talking about here?

This is a lot of quote tweets for beekeeping, that's pretty crazy.

This is a lot of beekeeping quote tweets.

A lot of quote tweets for beekeeping.

Uh okay.

These are pretty minuscule.

Is there anything large?

Is there a large response of some kind?

No, apparently not.

Okay.

Okay, I guess that's it.

I guess there's no other uh quotes we

of this post, you know?

What can we say?

So that's that.

And then, look, this is another funny one.

Party.

So, Eddie visited the Michigan Greenhouse.

I don't know if you guys saw it.

I'll show it to you.

And there's a meltdown in the quote tweets about this, which is quite interesting.

But let's watch it.

Today the American Communist Party Illinois and Iowa chapter are in Michigan helping them out with our party greenhouse.

Let's check this place out.

It's pretty sick.

This entire property belongs to the party so we got a hundred percent sovereignty.

Here we got the little lobby area where a lot of work is being done.

This area is gonna be turned into a cafe.

You can see we got all the most based flags on the wall.

Got these uniforms that were created and embroidered here by the members.

Got every color of hat that you could possibly want.

Here's where that work was done.

We got embroidery machines.

We've got a 3D printer with octopus linen.

Amazing things are happening here.

We're working on installing a gym so everybody can get jacked.

Got a couple bathrooms that are being installed here.

Still working on clearing out all the crap that the previous owners left.

Here we got a little garage that we're gonna turn into a mechanic shop where we can work on engines and other things like that.

And then out here of course we have the greenhouse where there's a whole bunch of land that we can use to grow food, community garden type thing.

This is also owned by the party recently acquired.

There's a whole bunch of land here and this is what we were working on today clearing this out so that we can start growing some food.

So this is the kind of stuff we're working on here at the American Communist Party.

No offense to other leftist organizations, but I don't know if anyone else is doing stuff like this.

If you want to get involved and help us transform this place into something amazing, you can check us out at ACP.us.

You will not regret it.

We got amazing things going on here folks.

Also check out these new shirts we got.

This is great.

If this flag offends you, I'll help you pack.

No, he's out of the National Guard.

He um he said he was going to

Okay, so it's like okay, I mean just like surely nobody takes surely nobody could take issue with this, right?

A look at one of these twenty twenty uh uh uh Snarky Simpsons East Coast.

Should I go?

Should I go there?

Should I go there?

Should I go there?

One of these snarky millennial East Coast twenty twenty.

Socialists

I'm a democratic socialist.

Should I go there?

I mean, I don't know.

Because I feel bad.

It may not even be true.

But there's just a certain gatekeeping archetype that I can't forget about from when I was first on Twitter 2021.

I can't forget about it.

I can't forget about it.

You know?

These people that are like, I'm just so, I have to type in lowercase.

I'm so beyond anything.

I'm so.

You're like fucking 35 years old.

You're like 40 years old.

Get off fucking Twitter.

What are you fucking doing?

Uh these cool people, these chapo, whatever, chapo trap house.

These are the cool guys.

These are the cool kids.

They have Simpsons gifts.

You're 35!

Stop the l stop this pretension!

Stop this pretentiousness!

You're not a gatekeeper of anything.

You're fucking lame as fuck.

You're not.

You're not what you think you're trying to exude.

It's not working.

It's not happening.

And but what did they say?

I like how they're just doing Hammer City again, but for white people.

You know, but

I I was gonna s I well, I was just gonna say kill yourself, but

But that's actually what I wanted to say.

Just kill yourself.

Like, you're literally an irredeemable fucking retard.

You should just kill yourself straight up.

Like, what do you want me to say?

What do you want me to say to such like a weird, like completely off the chart, like devoid of any reality type of thing to say?

Just kill yourself.

Like what do you want me to say?

Sorry, it's like what a stupid thing to say.

It's Hammer City again, but for white people.

How?

Who's moving into this greenhouse?

Who's moving into it?

How is this hammer?

What are you talking about?

It's a greenhouse.

It's a building that we're gonna have that's gonna be open to anyone who wants to visit it and hang out there.

Like what?

Like, what do you what?

What I don't understand how this is a cult compound or something.

Um.

Wha where is this even coming from?

Oh, because uh

Political extremists have acquired a building.

Okay, that yeah, that's Hammer City, sure.

I was waiting, waiting, just kill yourself.

Just end it.

You're there's no, there's just trust me, there's no reason to keep going.

Just just end it all.

How is I that's the extent of my patience with this type of shit?

I'm not gonna lie.

That's the extent of the patience that I've accumulated and I've started to acquire with these types of people.

Sorry.

How is ACP buying a building before DSA?

Because we're an actual fucking party, that's why.

Because we're not a fucking nebulous networking club for people that vaguely will agree that they're okay with socialism.

Wow.

Wow.

Free healthcare.

Wow.

Because we're an actual organized party.

What do you mean?

How would you buy a building?

You don't even have...

You would like fight and argue over like so many stupid things we don't care about.

You'd be like, no, we're not going to do this building because it's transphobic, because bricks are transphobic.

It's like you don't even, you can't even like agree on anything really besides electing

It takes you guys like 10 years to agree on anything, honestly.

It's like I'm sorry, but you like how would you how are you gonna be able to have the dynamism to be like a party, to be like anything that can do something like with discipline, coherence, and I mean, we're sits for Rich, we're saying this 'cause we're decentralized in a lot of ways, and this is Michigan chapter mainly, right?

But at the same time, we're just a chill party that's like, yo, you want to go open a greenhouse?

Fine.

But the DSA is like.

A social club of what are they going to do?

How are you going to have a building?

How are you going to agree upon how to run it and all these other kinds of things?

Like, you're just not, right?

We tend to be very easygoing and chill about these things, right?

But they're not.

HCP's biggest just every time there's something cool that we do, I hear another biggest accomplishment.

So, yeah, what a.

I don't know.

LARP.

Yeah, flags.

Fa yeah.

Because there's flags.

Yeah, don't don't pay no attention to the fact there's actually like construction going on.

Pay no attention to the fact that there's actually like

There's actually like motion here.

I get because there's flags, it's LARP.

Alright, well uh all right, let's just keep scrolling until we see something big.

ACB bought a cafe.

What?

What do you to exploit their party workers for minimum?

Holy reach.

Halo Reach, Halo Reets.

Oh, this person's on a furry.

That explains it.

This person sees and hears voices and shit.

They're like straight up mentally disabled.

Uh we're gonna peep we're gonna we're opening a coffee shop now and we're gonna have minimum wa this is news to me, chairman of the party.

Like what what do you mean?

Because Eddie said that there's there's a cafe,

So if you go to someone's house and you grab a beer in the fridge or something, is that like a a is that like a a business now?

What are you talking about?

Minimum we're gonna pay him minimum wage.

What do you mean?

This is something owned by the Michigan Chapter.

Like, what are you talking about?

What are you talking about?

This is crazy.

Alright.

I don't know.

Project, what's up?

I wanna entertain you guys by pretending to be outraged by shit I don't care about, but come on, I just Anyway, uh this smart person from the twenty twenties, another smart millennial

Remember when I was talking to that lip tart on TikTok?

The truth is very simple.

You describe oppression in this meticulous way.

We're all represent.

This is an insult to people who really do suffer for oppression.

Because for those who suffer oppression, there is one thing and one thing only that weighs over them.

Only one thing.

A Palestinian, there's one thing weighing over them.

And they wage war on this thing.

That thing is the occupation entity.

There's no meticulous or representation.

That's gibberish for people who suffer oppression.

For people who suffer oppression, the thing that's oppressing them is clear and present and in front of them.

And they can name it and they can refer to it.

And they can have a plan and an understanding of what needs to be done to overthrow it.

They don't have to play 21 questions naming off all of these meticulous nonsense things like therapy and training in order to understand what's at stake in the liberation of both themselves and the people they live with.

What you're describing is not oppression.

It's a managerial problem for HR departments to make bourgeois professionals feel more comfortable being in the adult daycares that they're in.

That's what you're talking about.

Or, God forbid, members of the bourgeoisie and their various disgusting, filthy bourgeois country clubs having a mutual understanding so there's no misunderstandings, so the white guy doesn't misunderstand the fact that the black guy next to him is his fellow class brethren and doesn't mistake him for a filthy proletarian.

So that's just facts.

It's just 100% facts.

And the reason you're seeing this reaction by PMC urbanoid lip tard fucking glasses wearing pieces of shit is because it cuts deep.

When they fucking hear this shit, it's like a bomb has been dropped on them that they feel viscerally.

They feel that viscerally.

Like, I'm fucking useless.

And I have no understanding of oppression.

And I am a fucking glasses-wearing parasite in the country that I live in that will never have any relationship to an authentic revolutionary struggle.

So how does Liv Agar respond to how they were made to feel by this video, which was a bomb dropped on them?

Well, we do need to educate people.

You you're you're saying the proletariat doesn't need educating.

The what are you fucking talking about?

What are you even fucking talking about?

First of all, there's so many prongs of this retardation here.

Prong one.

How can you equivocate the education of the proletariat with intersectional HR management and and all this nonsense about taking therapy classes and shit?

What do you mean?

What does that have to do with educating the proletariat?

Nothing.

Second of all, if you mean to say that.

I'm claiming the proletariat doesn't need to be educated about the fact that it's being oppressed.

Consider me fucking guilty as charged.

The fucking oppressed people don't need to be told that they're oppressed.

They know they're being oppressed.

And I'll even fucking drop another nuke.

They know who is oppressing them.

You think workers don't fucking know that their companies and the government oppresses them?

Of course they fucking know that.

You're a retard if they need to be told.

If you need to be told you're oppressed, you're not fucking oppressed.

End of fucking story.

So you asked the begs the question: then why does the proletariat not spontaneously affect or enact a revolution?

I'll tell you why.

It's really, really simple.

They're not missing.

They're not missing education about the fact that they're oppressed.

They're missing hope.

They understand all of these things.

They just think there's nothing that can be fucking done about it.

That's the reason that oppressed people.

Are passive or sometimes even participate in their own oppression because they're blackpilled.

They don't think there's anything that can be done about it.

The fuck fuck's gonna be done about it.

Especially they don't think something will be done about it if they're being taught told about intersectional gibber babble.

What can be fucking done?

You think people don't know how you you think people are so stupid because you're a Zionist.

You're a Jewish supremacist who sees the majority of the masses as retarded Goyem.

I'm gonna fucking go there.

These are a bunch of Jewish supremacists.

Leftist Marxist gatekeepers, quote-unquote Marxists.

They're not Marxists.

They're Jewish supremacists who see the proletariat and the masses as retarded Goyem.

The proletariat is much smarter than you think.

They see everything.

What they don't, the missing puzzle piece they don't have is what the fuck can be done about it.

Most of them think nothing can be done about it.

That's just how the world is.

Most of them think that's just the way that's just the way things fucking go.

That doesn't mean they don't know that they're being oppressed.

It means they don't have any fucking hope.

And that's the truth.

Most people know that it's the U.S.

regime that oppresses them.

Most people know that the fucking companies they're working for are fucking them over and oppressing them.

Of course, they fucking know that.

You think they need a Marxist to educate them about the shit they fucking see and feel and know every fucking day?

They don't.

What they need is leadership.

They need leadership.

They need to be led by people who know what the fuck they're doing and have an understanding of what the fucking way forward is.

Dad, boy, what's up?

Appreciate you.

When you have leadership, when you have people who know and understand, you have a strategic vision about what can be fucking done.

It's not hard for people that are oppressed to follow it.

It's not hard for them.

To follow suit.

Like, did the Bolsheviks educate the masses before the revolution?

No!

If they did, it was a small minority of the masses.

The truth is that people educated in Marxism were in the Bolshevik Party.

99.99% of the masses before the October Revolution.

They had no fucking clue what Marxism was.

That was something the cadre understood in the party.

That's why there's a class-cadre distinction.

The Bolsheviks provided the answers and the leadership about what to fucking do.

What to fucking do.

Nobody needed to be taught that the Tsar was oppressing them.

Nobody needed to be taught that the Kerensky provisional government was oppressing them.

Nobody needed to be fucking taught that.

They knew it.

It was the Bolsheviks that had a fucking strategy.

They had a strategy for how to go forward.

And that's why people rallied behind the Bolsheviks, who said peace, land and bread.

The prole of course the proletariat needs to be educated by the logic of struggle.

But people who are oppressed know that they're being oppressed and can name who's oppressing them.

If they're put in a discursive context in which it is possible that they can have the opportunity to even think about what they're oppress of course they fucking know what it is.

How is this how 5.5 thousand real people like this?

That's fine.

I think there's that minimum.

15 million petty bourgeois intelligentsia in the world, 15 million who are not going to make it.

At minimum, there's probably 15 million bourgeois intelligentsia in the world who not only are mentally retarded and can be written off entirely, but objectively speaking, if there's a world revolution and the collapse of the American Empire, at minimum, that amount of people will have no place in the future.

Is that crazy for me to say?

Or maybe it's too much, fifteen, a it's at least one million.

So five point five thousand people being mentally retarded doesn't bother me because

It's not even close to the amount of people who I will write off globally as irredeemable.

Not me, only God can do that.

But I will accept God's judgment.

If God decides that, you know, this many, this amount of people just.

Have no place in the in the future of the revolution.

They're counter revolutionaries, they're reactionaries.

They're petty bourgeois gatekeepers, pretending to be Marxists, but in reality trying to make themselves feel more useful than they are.

Have we been bereft of academic institutions educating people, educating people am I marking them?

Go to a fucking go to any college right now.

No, no, no, just just go to any.

Keep the stream open, get on your bicycle and go visit a fucking college.

Are they not talking about marks enough in the colleges?

For how many years have they been talking about marks in colleges?

Tell me.

But where's the results?

Where's the result?

All these educated people that are so smart with glasses, that know everything about Marxism, that know about Marx.

What?

Where but well, how what we have a nothing sandwich.

They're cooking in the kitchen and they came out with a nothing sandwich.

You're saying the proletariat doesn't need educating.

I am absolutely saying that people who are oppressed do not absolutely are not confused whatsoever about the fact that they are oppressed.

And it is not hard.

Notice the fucking bad faith.

Because even if people who are oppressed genuinely have no fucking clue how they're being oppressed or who's doing it, let's say I'll I'll grant that's possible.

Once you tell them, it's not hard for them to understand.

And when I was debating this intersectional whatever, it was very, very hard for them to explain to me what oppression is and what are examples of oppression.

But people who are actually oppressed

Somehow

If you can at least help them a tiny bit, just give them a hint.

They get it.

It's like this.

They get it.

Go tell a Palestinian.

Maybe a Palestinian might be confused about who's oppressing them.

Okay.

Tell them it's Israel.

Just like that.

So much of everything would be making sense in their life.

Just it's Israel.

Okay.

I go and I talk to people in America, the fucking government.

Of course we know the government oppresses us.

Okay.

These shitty, disgusting fucking companies and banks and all these things people fucking deal with on a daily basis.

Yes.

Go ask a black person in the hood if the police don't oppress them.

Or who's oppressing you?

You think they don't know?

You need to go educate them that the police oppress them.

Black people in the hood are waiting for Liv Agar to come to them and explain to them that the police oppress them.

They don't know that yet.

They're confused about it, they have no idea.

They have to wait for Liv to come and explain to them their oppression.

Look, Marxists play a role in having a strategic vision, in understanding the mechanisms, right, the details of how it works.

But that doesn't mean Marxists are the ones creating the very cause of the liberation from oppression.

No, they're not.

Marxists are not the ones that are creating the context.

They're not the ones who are giving people a fucking reason to want.

To fight oppression.

People already want this.

People already know that they're oppressed.

They just don't have hope.

They don't have faith.

They don't have hope.

This is an insult.

People who are really oppressed, educated.

You always have to read between the fine lines because there's nothing about what I said that doesn't fucking make sense to 99% of people in good faith.

Read between the lines what they mean by education.

They mean you need to go and put them through courses that explain to them how when they fart, every fart they have is a microaggression on transgender Eskimos.

Every fart that they've ever done is disabled people have been blown up because their feelings were hurt when they, you know, I don't know, when they fucking.

When they aggressively opened a door,

As a show of strength, and it made people who are disabled feel bad about their lack of ability to open doors.

We need to educate but if you you you have to listen to the debate.

You have to listen to the debate I was in.

Uh, 5.5 thousand people.

You're coping!

You're coping!

You're coping!

What do we call this in a debate?

What do you call it, by the way, when people cope in this way?

Where I say your retarded idea that people need to be initiated into intersectional, fucking meticulous nonsense, when for people who are actually oppressed, it's actually much simpler than that.

And then they go, Oh, you're saying that you don't need any education at all.

Okay, you're trying to make me sound unreasonable because you're coping with the fact that I'm confronting you with how retarded your position is.

Simple as that.

That's what I'm doing.

I'm just educating the proletariat.

No, no, no, that's what I'm doing.

I'm just when I'm telling people they can't fucking clap and they have to do the jazz hands, that's me educating the proletariat.

I'm here to educate you about your oppression.

I'm here to educate you about your oppression.

Okay?

I mean, no, because you don't understand.

No, no, no, because you don't understand.

You really don't understand.

That's the truth.

You don't understand your oppression.

Uh, you need to understand that, um.

Fuck, I was gonna do a bit from last night that I thought of.

I'm trying to fucking remember it.

Trying to fucking remember it.

I was in the car last night.

I just thought it to myself.

I was like, this would be hilarious.

What was I what was I gonna say?

Fuck.

Trying to think.

I was gonna cook.

I was gonna cook with something.

Mm-hmm.

What car do it bro, fuck off.

Fuck you talking about?

I drive a fucking Bugatti 'cause of all the fucking support you guys show me.

Should have wrote it down.

No, it was more like a vibe.

I was just like putting myself in the shoes of these people.

And it's like the problem with that is, but before we could do the class struggle, we have to think about the ways in which the trans-disabled folks are being negligent toward the HR procedures of properly doing the right thing because you have to understand the dynamics and the systems of oppression.

There's many dynamic systems of oppression that all interact, intersect with one another.

The various intersecting dynamics of oppression that are a consequence of the structural consequences of the structural reality of the forced patriarchal cis-heteronormative realities and structures that in everyday life, when people are walking around, they don't see it, but it's actually there.

When you're actually woke, you can see it.

What's actually going on is that the black transgender people of color who are also Mexican, they're also disabled.

And you need to understand that they're being oppressed because they're not being adequately represented in the latest Netflix special about Martin Luther King Jr., who's actually a transgender Eskimo.

And what you have to understand is that in the biography of King Arthur, we need to make King Arthur a fat person.

We have to make a fat woman King Arthur, a fat black woman, actually.

Subterranean, what's up?

The latest Netflix special, we need more representation so people that can unlearn and deconstruct the constructs in their head about the various cis honesty, that wasn't even what I was talking about, though.

Last night was something else.

Might not even be related to this.

What can I say?

What can I say?

What can I say?

Okay, last bit of X review, Tweeter review on the Twitter.

The last part of the Tweeter review will be uh

It was not related to Liv Agar.

Now I remember what I was so triggered about last night.

I remember what I was triggered by, and I was in the car, and I was like, this would sound funny.

I'm not even going to draw attention to it.

I got into a fucking argument with someone about Marxist theory, and it was really, there's a specific type.

of European Marxist academic

That is really triggering to me.

Because they're like all have in common this like, I don't know, it's just like neo-Kantian framework of Marxism.

And I it triggers me, it does bother me.

Ah, that's what it was.

I remember now.

I remember exactly.

It has nothing to do with the, it wasn't like a woke thing.

It wasn't about woke people.

It was something very different.

It's like that's the classic European academic Marx.

It's like we need to comprehend the proper ethical political commitments that go into.

I was doing an accent, maybe, that go into the necessity of a shared Marxist framework of understanding that how we're going to proceed on the principles of a collective organization.

It requires a very specific, meticulous, ethical, political framework based on a straight understanding of the structural principles that are rooted in the ultimately rooted in the principles of ethical reason.

And we have to understand that in order to partake in the revolutionary struggle, we first must be accountable to the transparent rational principles that go into the ethical, political, legal consequences of a very specific trajectory within Western civilization that comes from the very specific structures and understanding of the democratic, yes, but also republican frameworks that are a consequence of a contractual obligation and a set of shared discursive frameworks, a shared semiotic and discursive framework in which we understand the necessity of the shared ethical political foundations and commitments that are a consequence of being in a common institution.

And the institution has both obligations and also grants a certain rights.

And this is a specific ethical-political Greco-Roman lineage that is a draw upon from Western civilization, which we as Marxists must, of course, accept and understand.

A very specific trajectory within the development of history, which is a consequence of the reality that in order for having a revolutionary struggle, we must be very clear about the principles of socialism in terms of a shared linguistic, discursive, ethical, political, moral framework that creates the conditions of the justification for why.

And I was triggered as fuck last night about it because I was just so fucking exhausted because I wanted to just focus on finishing the Islam thing and I fucking couldn't.

I was just fucking like, I was just triggered.

I was not in a good mood.

Um.

I just I hate European academic Marxists.

I just I there they're just I I just I just feel like I I just like I just can't.

I'm an Islamo-Marxist.

I you know what an Islamo-Marxist is?

I want to tell you, because a lot of people don't understand this thing about Marxism being equal to Islam.

Marxism is very simple to me, actually.

Marxism is very simple to me.

Marxism equals Islam.

I'm not going to get into the nitty-gritty, the substitute for what my article is going to be and how it's going to, how specifically I'm going to argue this, because I want it to be a surprise because it's actually unique and nobody's ever fucking done it before.

But, you know, in any case, look.

Karl Marx, I'm gonna tell you the truth about Karl Marx.

Karl Marx just took all of European philosophy.

He took all of European philosophy and he basically said that shit is coping, useless nonsense.

All we need are Turks with scimitars and swords to gallop their way into the world and just fucking bum rush that shit.

That was basically what Marx was saying.

Marx was basically saying, I shit you not.

I mean, it sounds stupid in your head, but I'm telling you, it's the truth.

Marx, okay, the truth is.

Marx rejected a specifically European fixation on the need for mediation.

That's the truth.

Marx insisted upon a specific comprehension of what a material object is.

When I say material object, I'm referring to the central subject of Marx's revolutionary project.

Which is simultaneously a type of being, a material being.

What is the materiality?

Like, what is that?

What is the actual real thing as opposed to the abstractions of thought and the abstractions of ideality and so on and so on?

Yes, Marx has a dialectical understanding of the material real and material being.

But he has an understanding of material being that is already intrinsically lawful, dialectical, and in some sense rational.

And so Marx, his entire gesture, in contradiction to the entire history of European philosophy and idealism, is that the highest gesture of thought and of philosophy and of thinking in general, of the thinking consciousness, and also the highest practical act is to give way to material necessity.

Give way to something that already basically exists, right?

That already is basically there.

That already has the force, the momentum.

The quality of self-relating recursivity.

But is something that is being, you know, that

That that that's there in the real already, right?

Tautologically in a sense.

Marx, Marx's, Marx's maxim is: submit.

Give way.

Give way and submit.

Stop fucking coping.

Stop building all these retarded castles of the ideal in your fucking head.

Stop fucking coping about this arbitrarily contrived gatekeeping need for a mediation that doesn't need to be there.

Just surrender.

And submit, submit and surrender.

Submit in Islam.

I'll get into the etymology and the writing and stuff, what it actually means.

Just surrender to the truth.

Just accept the truth.

The truth, in a sense, is obvious.

Just surrender to it.

Surrender.

To reality.

Right, it's so simple.

I'm not going to elaborate, but more or less, that's all Islam is.

That's all it is.

And Marx was a Muslim, he was a Muslim.

Stop this coping.

Stop.

I mean, people are going to not understand what I'm saying.

They're going to say, oh, you're just talking about being a retarded brute.

Well, no, I'm just saying that Mark's

Marx is a monotheist.

Marx comprehends a radical simplicity of what man is materially.

And however brilliant man is, however complex and brilliant and dialectical, it is still radically simple.

And

It's all rooted in good faith.

It's all rooted in good faith.

Now, there's a lot of glasses wearing mark soids, and there's a lot of Muslims that are not going to like what they read when I do release it.

But it will all make sense, don't worry.

But uh how do I how do I like sum this up in a way that I can do on stream?

Right.

How do I do this in a way that I can on stream?

Sounds more Jewish to me.

Uh no, it's not, because you're just confusing that with Jewish fatalism and it's not what I'm trying to say.

No, it's not Jewish at all.

Um

Marx was straight up a Muslim.

Actually, if you read the Jewish question, Mark straight up just says he's a Muslim without even knowing what Islam is.

And I can literally tell you why.

But I don't need sensitive people to get upset by it.

Okay.

Because I'm just going to tell you what Marks thought.

All right.

Marx in the Jewish question basically said that

In Western civilization

Our sensibilities and our relationship to the material world was just based in Judaism and Jewish metaphysics, right?

And that Judaism was the ultimate alienating existential condition in a way, right?

Like, materially speaking, you know, Judaism.

Posits a very alienated form of humanity which doesn't hold humanity in s in in much high esteem.

And um you know

The materialism of the world, so to speak, is Jewish to Marx.

Like the materialism of capitalism and all that kind of stuff, right?

And then Marx was saying that Christianity was the sublime thought of Judaism.

He said Christianity was the thinking, the spiritual side of this original Judaism.

But it just abstracted it into high heaven.

It was very noble.

It was very lofty.

All this brotherhood, you know, whatever, morality, all this, the moral center.

But that confined itself to an abstraction.

So the universality of Christianity was the universality of an abstraction that was based in the.

Division of mental labor of philosophers and ideologists who were preaching about heaven and preaching about high and mighty morals and all this kind of stuff.

But that was not actually addressed to the actual real world, right?

So the real world just remained Jewish.

Okay.

And Marx, more or less, gets around to saying something along the lines of that communism.

Well actually

Um you know, restore the dignity of man.

To uh

An existence of man worthy of the the the being of man, right?

Something like that.

I'm not gonna para could quote them exactly with accuracy.

But in any case, for Marx

Christianity and Judaism are two opposites.

Judaism is this alienating materialism.

Christianity is an alienating idealism.

Both are forms of alienation, according to Karl Marx.

Logically, if you think about it though, logically the conclusion is that Islam is the way.

Sorry, don't take it from me.

The so-called material in Judaism contains the heavenly.

Ah, in in a very specific and limited sense, sure.

I'm not going to get into the problems within Judaism because I know it's complex, but.

From the standpoint of Christian society, Western Christian society, no.

Standpoint of Western Christian society, Judaism is just materialism, right?

That's all we need to agree on here.

So.

If you think about it though, if you read Marx's Jewish question, the logical conclusion is that Islam is the way.

The logical conclusion is that Islam is the actual thing that comprehends the imminence, the reality of the moral in the material, that doesn't posit a one-sided material substance, materiality, but simultaneously doesn't posit the abstraction and alienation of the idea, of the thought.

Islam is a golden path in the middle.

It's an Islamic saying that Moses was blind in his right eye and that Jesus was blind in his left eye.

If it's heretical, whatever.

This is an Islamic saying, but the idea was that.

You know, Jesus in Christianity is focused on heaven, it's focused on the spiritual, Judaism is focused on the material, and that Islam is seeing with both eyes, right?

That's the idea.

Um

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just telling you.

I'm just telling you.

According to Marx himself.

I think it just alienates Christians from Marxism.

Truth is truth.

If it alienates you, I don't know what to tell you.

Christianity is not rooted in idealism.

I don't think it is actually.

I don't think it is, but I also think

Ah, I just I don't know why people are like

I just feel like I gotta like pay re like tribute to every type of identity there is, and I'm just kind of sick of it.

It's like, all right, it's like, what do you want me to say?

Do I have to talk about all the fucking nuances or shouldn't that just be fucking implied by everything I say already?

Shouldn't it just be fucking implied that I'm talking about things in a very narrow strict sense and not I'm not fucking discounting every fucking possible word in which the word Christianity could be used.

I'm just using it in the sense Marx was talking about it in the Jewish question, that one article from fucking 200 years ago.

But no, do I have to apologize to every sect and denomination of every fucking religion that I talk about in any fucking specific context?

That is even remotely something beyond, you know, like, yeah, whatever.

It's like, look, guys, I think Marxism is Muslim.

I think it is.

I think Marxism is Islamic.

I think it's Muslim.

I'm not saying that to pander to any group.

I don't think Muslims will accept this truth at all.

But I just think it's the truth.

You know, I just that's actually what I think.

I think Marxism is Islam.

I reject Islam as the thing that's standard.

Like Saudi Arabia's not just Wahhabism.

I reject the standardized, established form of Islam that exists today.

You people will hurl at me over all these rules and legalisms about Islam.

It's like, dude, I'd rather just be an atheist than even look at you.

I don't like Islamic LARP.

I don't like the Saudi created aesthetics that surround Islam.

To be honest, I don't like the culture of how Islam is reconciled with the modern age.

I think all of that was created by Saudi Arabia.

But I like the simplicity of Islam and the way Malcolm X did, probably.

I like the simplicity.

I like the oneness.

I like the.

Strict

emphasis on revelation, on belief,

And I like the absence of

Metaphysical mediation.

That's what I like about Islam.

You want to understand what I like about Islam.

I like the absence.

of metaphysical mediation.

Amilo, what's up?

And by metaphysical mediation, I mean to say, I like the fact that you can just be exposed and accept the truth in your heart, and that's it.

I like the fact that you don't need

Jibber babble, if I'm being honest, I like the fact you don't need jibber babble.

Now that's true for Christianity and most of its expressions, but

I just feel like a lot of Christians who are online are very.

Are always twisting themselves into a pretzel.

Like, why can't you just say the Bible is communism?

Just like, just say it.

The Bible is communism.

Just say that.

Emil, what's up?

Just say Jesus was communist.

Just say the Bible is communist.

Why are there so many times on the internet I see every time?

In infrared, a lot of the time, like everyone wants to be a fucking philosopher.

I mean, I guess the Muslims in infrared are the same fucking way.

I don't know.

Everything is much more simple than fucking it it has it's been made out to be.

It's so much more simple.

How can it bro, I'm not gonna read that, just fuck off.

How does that reconcile the absolute certainty that of the Quran versus in Christianity the metaphorical little That's what I'm talking about!

I'd rather just say Marxism is Islam.

If you want me to say Marxism is Christianity, which I've said for my entire fucking time I've been on the internet.

I'm not saying that anymore because you're fucking annoying me with gibber words.

Okay, so I'm just gonna say it's Islam.

If we need Islam to be simple, we're just gonna go with Islam.

It was preceded by Christianity's dialectical materialism.

But I don't have these distinctions that you have.

That's what I'm saying.

Like, that's why I'm annoyed.

That's why I like Islam.

I feel like Islam is the thing where I could just be like, I don't have to care about distinctions at all.

Everything is the same thing to me.

I don't have to fucking care about distinctions at all.

I don't have to put Christianity here and Islam there and this and that there.

All that shit is the same thing to me.

Just different words for the same thing.

But what is the thing that we're talking about?

If you can't be simple about how you talk about that thing, you're losing me.

You're losing me.

If you can't be simple about how you're talking about the thing, and that's why I'm clinging so much to Islam here.

Because Islam does allow me to simply refer to that thing very simply.

Just say it's Islam.

That's it.

Allah.

That's it.

Simple.

Be simple about it.

Uh what about Shia versus Sunni?

Okay, if you're a Muslim scholar, you're just out here gibbering for sure.

But

I just feel like it's not hard to just take up a scimitar and be like, Allahu Waqbar.

Like, I feel like that's just easy.

That's what I'm saying.

I feel like it's just like there's such a simplicity there.

Yes, there's all these ways of interpreting whatever the fuck you want, but like at the end of the day, when you take an RPG, what are you yelling?

Allahu Akbar, right?

That's the type of shit that I'm talking about.

Like, that's why.

That's why I'm leaning on it, you know?

I'm just gonna be fucking brutally honest with y'all.

Like, it's about rising from the abstract to the concrete.

Be concrete.

Be concrete.

Right?

Just always be concrete about things.

If you're interested, I am not bothered by people saying that Jesus is God.

I'm not bothered by people depicting Jesus.

I'm not bothered by people who believe in the Trinity.

I'm not bothered by that specific way of expressing the same fucking thing that I believe in, just in a different way.

I'm not hostile to that at all.

I'm not hostile to the cross.

I'm not bothered by it.

I see it as a different expression.

Uh the same thing that I believe.

Um, I really like some Christian symbols.

I was actually thinking of making infrared merch based on the fish, but I was gonna have it be two scimitars.

I just, you know, I gave it, I kind of spoiled it, gave it away, but that would kind of go hard as fuck if you think about it.

If we made it like, if you made it like powerful like that, like it's like militant, the fish, you made it with those, I don't know.

Haas, Christians have an identity crisis.

I I'm you know, the the truth is the majority of IGG is Christian, so that's why I'd be like there's a lot of babblers, but all the Muslims are also babblers.

That's the truth.

So there's too many babblers.

There's too much schizobabble a lot of the time in general.

There's too much walls of text.

There's too much people who don't articulate themselves concretely and with concreteness.

Um, that's just the truth.

It's got nothing to do with Christianity, it's just a problem of the infrared vision lacks the simplicity that it needs to have in order to fucking become giant.

And

People overthrowing trying to justify religion and communism.

There you go, that's what I'm talking about.

That's the truth.

That's exactly what it is.

There's an insecurity about the relationship of religion and communism.

And you want to know the real reason I don't have that insecurity?

I don't have that insecurity because I'm actually just a communist.

But a real communist.

Like I I don't

I want to go full Allahu Akbar.

Every time I see these Reddit new atheists, I hate those people.

They're literally disgusting kuffudder.

They're disgusting infidels.

I fucking hate them.

I actually hate them.

But in my heart of hearts, it's like a f yeah, I'm

There is nothing Stalin did that I'm gonna be like, you know, you shouldn't have done that.

Like, if the Soviet state, if China are cracking down on religion.

You know, I'm not going to be like, it's like, yo, I'm with the party.

Do you understand?

I'm with the communist.

Like, I'm just telling you the truth.

Like, I don't.

I know where I am.

I know where I stand.

I know where I'm looking.

I'm not bogged in metaphysics and gibber, any religion whatsoever.

But I also am not secular.

That's what I'm trying to say.

I'm also not secular.

I believe in this shit.

I am a believing communist, I actually believe in this shit.

I would catch bullets for this shit, for Lenin.

I would literally tie myself to a missile for communism, for the cause, for Lenin.

For the revolution, it's like that's what I believe in.

And

I just disdain fuck it, I'm dropping a nuke right now.

Oh nobody's ready for this nuke.

I'm not gonna drop it.

I'm not gonna drop it.

You're not ready.

You're not ready for the nuke.

You're not ready.

Well

Religion in the technical sense, in the technical sense.

Religion

Is a division of labor.

How can you, if you think about it,

Religion is Reddit as well because you're boxing something off.

My religion is Marx.

My religion is like the revolution, the living existence.

Yes, when I think of God, when I th all these things make sense to me for sure.

Religious practices also make sense to me, and rituals, I see the meaning behind them.

They make sense to me.

But if I'm being honest,

People who have a distinction between the sacred and the secular are already in Reddit, if you have that distinction.

Now if you're trying to deny the sacred and only assert the secular, you're a fucking disgusting retarded animal and I hate you.

But if you're pretending to hold close to the sacred without reconciling how you're also a secular person.

I see you as a fucking hypocrite and a LARPer.

So the truth is.

The struggle is sacred, the revolution is sacred, the party is sacred.

History is sacred.

The reality we dwell in and occupy is sacred.

And um

I don't like secularism.

I I I don't mind communist atheism and if you press me too far, if I get annoyed too much by religious LARPers, I'm just gonna be a communist atheist.

But this meme is necessary.

This thing about Marxism being Islam is necessary.

Because Marxism has been overrun by disgusting secular glasses wearers who are literally subhuman filth and I fucking hate them.

They're kuffa.

I fucking hate them.

I hope they burn proverbially.

These cynical Reddit pieces of shit.

Oh, but Marx and Lenin.

Lennon was more of a jihadi than anyone.

He believed in that shit.

You're not Lenin.

Lenin believed in what he was doing.

You don't have belief.

Oh, but Lenin said to expel people who were doing religious rituals because they were doing, didn't believe enough in the cause.

That's why.

Not because he was a cynical fuck who was a nihilist like you.

And just fucking Lenin was saying.

Why do you need to go to mosque or church?

This is your church.

This struggle right here.

Here and now.

That was the type of shit.

That was the type of vibe Lenin was on.

He was not a fucking guy like, religion's so stupid.

Why don't we just fucking drink lemonade?

Religion is just so dumb.

I'm cynical.

All these dumb goyem.

That's not what Lenin's attitude was.

He was a fanatical revolutionary and communist.

He believed.

He was a believer.

He had faith in his heart.

Same with Shaguevara and the rest.

Do not fucking channel Lenin to justify your nihilistic, fucking pussy world and life that you, your worthless, nihilist, pussy life.

Of being a cynical you're like Garfield.

Oh, brother, all these people are stupid.

I'm Garfield.

They're like, fuck you.

Fuck you.

Do not channel Lenin when you're trying to talk about atheism.

Because Lenin was about some real ass shit that you are not.

You're a fucking Persian diaspora in a French cafe reading the newspaper about oh, these stupid Iranian masses kicked me out.

Oh, religion.

Bro, you're a Zionist.

You're in the citadels of Zionism.

You need fucking Netanyahu's Iron Dome to protect you from the masses.

You are out of touch.

You're out of the game.

You're out of the game.

You're out of it.

You're in a fucking cafe wearing a scarf.

Pack it up.

Stop the LARP.

At one point communism was gonna take over the planet 'cause people believed in it.

You are an infidel.

You don't fucking believe in anything.

You're cynical and blackpilled.

If you're cynical and blackpilled, you're out.

Go be cynical and blackpilled by yourself.

But the minute you step into politics or anything relating to culture, you're Netanyahu.

Ow, religion is dude shut the fuck up Shut the fuck up You're not attacking religion in the way that Lenin did

And like Lenin didn't attack it or whatever, but it's like the reason Lenin was an atheist was not for the same reason that you are.

Lenin was an atheist because he was fully dedicated to the cause.

You're not fully dedicated to any cause because you're cynical about it.

Even communism, you laugh at it.

For you, dialectical materialism is a meme.

Lenin would nuke 25 countries in defense of dialectical materialism.

He believed in it that strongly.

Lenin would do I mean, I'm not gonna say this, in there were Maoists in the last century who would have done 9-11 in defense of dialectical materialism.

Instead of Al-Qaeda, you could have had Al Al Gonzalo or some shit.

Right?

Like they they were fanatical.

There was something there.

It was just as like aggressive as a religion.

You don't have that.

You don't have the fucking equivalent of that.

You are a faithless infidel, devoid of any cause, devoid of any belief, devoid of any purpose.

There's no guiding star in your life.

You don't lay your down.

You don't fucking lay your life down for anything.

You're a cynical Nietzschean last man consumer Reddit atheist.

The meaning of Reddit atheist doesn't mean a Lenin who's strictly an atheist.

A Reddit atheist is a nihilistic last man passive type of person who's just like, I watch porn all day and I don't have any purpose in my life.

But yeah, this whole God thing is silly to me.

This whole religion thing is like, dude, that's what you are.

You're a Reddit atheist.

It means you're a nihilist consumerist subject.

You're not Hezbollah.

You're not Hamas.

You're not any of these people that are actually revolutionaries.

They're the revolutionaries today.

Iran, Iran and its allies, they're the revolutionaries.

You're a fucking, you have a quirky coffee mug.

While Iran leads the world revolution, you have a quirky coffee mug that makes fun of and

Degrades and defiles and blasphemes the image of Marx and Engels and Lenin.

You post memes about Enver Hoxha, you know, b sexual memes about Enver Hoxha.

You're not a atheist, Marxist, Leninist.

You're just a fucking nihilistic liberal Redditor.

So this meme needs to take off.

We need to destroy Reddit new atheism.

Marxism is Islam.

I don't want to ever hear any religious babbler in my ear about anything for the rest of my life.

Ever.

Because I don't fucking care about gibber.

You want to gatekeep something?

Go like, leave me alone.

I don't care.

And it's like, okay, and then we have this guy.

Islam directly and explicitly guarantees the right to private property and business.

This is such like a Roblox argument.

It's so like Roblox.

It's like you you this it just reminds me of Roblox.

Because

The implication is just that, like, I've never thought of this.

Like, I could never have possibly considered this, right?

It's like, I just see it as like a robot.

This is like a Roblox server theory of I.

It's like, are you kidding?

On the Roblox Wikipedia of Islam, it's totally different.

It's like, yeah, I'm literally engaging in like a semiotic terrorism, and you're like sitting here, like, falling back on the fucking things.

I'm doing a full semiotic 9-11 to destroy.

And it's like a Roblox, it's like a Roblox argument, straight up.

I'm doing, yeah, it's like such a SpongeBob, like Roblox argument.

Like, I'm straight up doing like a semiotic full frontal assault to destroy the various signifiers and webs of association people associate with these various different words to have them think about them in different ways.

And you're just falling back on these like strict distinctions and definitions, which I am asserting in the first place clearly do not mean much to me in the first place.

I don't care about what people conventionally consider or think of Islam as.

The only thing that matters in terms of what Islam actually is is how it registers in our unconscious.

And memes are more important than Wikipedia.

That's the truth.

Memes, this is what I believe in.

I believe in a meme warfare on the British Oxford Encyclopedia or whatever.

What is it called?

The main Webster's encyclopedia?

What is the Webster's Dictionary?

What's the main encyclopedia people go to?

I believe in memes overrunning and destroying all of that because memes are more honest about what words actually mean versus this encyclopedic retard Reddit the definition of XYZ.

First of all, Islam directly and X.

Okay, let me call Islam and ask them: Yo, Islam, what's up?

Do you guarantee the right to private property and business?

Oh, you don't?

All right.

No, actually I just called Islam.

They said they don't.

What do you mean Islam?

Who is Islam?

What is Islam?

Oh, you're talking about uh a specific uh jurisprudent, whatever, legal tradition in the religion.

Okay.

You mean based on a specific understanding of the revelation?

Like, what are you talking about?

You're talking about a specific interpretation that's been adapted to the modern world by Saudi Arabia.

You want to know the worst part about this is like this is not true.

This is not even true.

Islam does not believe in any unalienable rights.

The framework of modern rights did not exist in Islam.

According to Islam, Allah owns everything.

Everything is Allah, belongs to Allah.

Islam, as a gesture of mercy, permits people to have custodianship over belongings, over things that they're using.

That's not private property in the Greco-Roman legalistic framework or tradition of what private property is at all.

Private property can be alienated freely.

Private property, you have like absolute sovereignty and jurisdiction over it.

You could do whatever you want with it.

Private property is a specific institution.

Private property doesn't mean you have things.

And that's literally how the Quran describes property.

Literally what you can have with your right hand, what you have in your right hand.

That's how it describes property.

Like, besides the fact this guy's arguing with a meme, it's not even true.

In the Quran, there's no guarantee, there's no right to private property.

There is a specific defense of people people's belongings or businesses being protected against un in un injustice, against like, you know, uh a a cruel kind of fucking

Thief just fucking taking it and oppressing and exploiting people.

Amila.

But like, there it's never Islam does not respond to communism at all.

Nowhere in the Quran is it talking about is it being like, oh, yeah, I've heard your argument, communist, but no, we're gonna.

They're not even talking about that.

They're talking about the various forms of injustice that existed when you take for granted the relations of production that prevailed at that time.

You know, if someone's just robbing your caravans as a bandit, or if some kind of ruler is coming along and making it impossible for a guy who runs a fruit stand to make a living or something, Islam is addressing things like that.

But is Islam addressing and preemptively rejecting something like, you know.

Um

The development of the productive forces reaching such a level that money is no longer necessary, that

The ownership of the means of production is well, first of all, I didn't even have to because the ownership of the means of production being private is not only so alien to Islam, it's just alien to the Orient in general, to be honest.

Most means of production are by default owned by the sovereign.

We're talking about waterworks, we're talking about infrastructure.

Even in a lot of cases, manufacturing was just directly owned by the sovereign.

Um you know, if you're talking about people owning camels and shit, it's like well, that was the conditions that they lived in at that time.

Does Islam does the Quran preemptively like deny that people can have computers or something?

S the modern world looks very different.

So Saudi Arabia, when it got all these oil revenues, standardized a specific interpretation of Islam and made that the fucking standard you know rules of what Islam is throughout.

Like I don't have to respect that at all.

I'm sorry, I don't.

I don't have to confine every sense in which I use the word Islam to the very narrow understanding that it prevails and is established.

I clearly have very little respect for that.

If I'm going to take time to make a picture like this, think about this.

A man who's going to take the time to create an image like this is not beginning with a whole lot of respect for how words are conventionally defined.

They're just not.

Do you really think I care about how most people understand what Islam is or even what they think Marxism is?

No, clearly I think the prevailing view people have on these things consciously is retarded.

I'm trying to tap into something unconscious.

It's clearly working because look 100,000 views of people that are fucking because I've tapped something.

There's so much incoherent, retarded bullshit that's on X that nobody will respond to.

But this shit is making waves because there is something about it that's true, which people do not have the conscious faculties of reason to clarify and understand.

And that's just a fact.

And that's just a fact.

Like I I'm sorry, I hate disappointing.

I don't want to disappoint religious people.

Some of y'all are like, Haz, why don't you say Marxism is Christianity?

And it's like, I'm being harsh.

I'm being harsh.

Because the harsh truth is just not a good meme.

Communism being Christian is a great meme.

The word communism and Christianity, that's a great meme.

But Marxism being Christian is not a good meme.

Now, is Marxism Christian?

Yes, it is.

It it is Christian.

I mean, hello.

You don't have don't fucking think I'm a retard, okay?

Hegel is a Christian philosopher.

Hegel's logic was carried over into Marxism.

Of course, Marxism is Christian.

But that's not a good meme.

That's not a good semiotic register.

It doesn't function as well as a semiotic register as Marxism is Islam.

Um that's what I'm trying to say.

Like I feel like this is a brutal nuke.

I feel like this is something that can work.

Maybe it won't.

Maybe it will.

But I've been looking at the discourse in this fierce.

If you look at the discourse, people are fiercely debating about Islam and Marxism.

Not Christianity and Marxism, Islam and Marxism.

So by saying that they're the same thing, we are unlocking the mystical side of Marxism in general.

You know?

Okay.

Uh I don't think communism is Jewish would ring, 'cause it's not true.

Communism is not Jewish.

The truth is

I'm gonna say some shit as well.

Judaism.

Is either a sect of

Judaism functions as a sect of whatever the prevailing Abrahamic religion is in the country that it's in.

A lot of Jews are not going to like hearing that who are religious, but that's my observation.

When Jews are in Islamic empires, Judaism is just a sect of Islam.

When Jews are in Christian civilization, Judaism becomes a specific sect of Christianity.

And that's because Judaism doesn't have a universal framework of civilization.

Judaism is a tradition that's adapted to different civilizations, but it itself has no understanding of it has no like universal dimension at all.

Are you against Judaism theologically?

Um

No, but I think Judaism theologically creates confusions in the modern world that lead to very horrific things like Zionism.

But provided

There are kind of mystical Jews who

Who who can reconcile Jewish theology with the world that they live in, you know?

But they're more mystical and they're very influenced by Sufism usually.

And they're more.

They're very.

They have a very deep understanding of the spiritual, whatever.

But.

Um

Yeah.

There's no more Judaism theologically.

It died in the year thirty I d I don't know about that.

I don't know about that.

You mean like Derrida yeah, I kinda like Derrida, I'm not gonna lie.

I kinda I kinda do like Derrida, actually.

A little bit.

Um isn't that every religion in the modern world?

Yeah, that's true.

You're you're not wrong.

But uh

I just, I don't like the lack of can I just be honest, I don't like the lack of self-awareness.

My problem with Judaism is when there's a lack of self-awareness.

When Jewish atheists.

Including the ones who try to gatekeep Marxism.

They have not made peace with with with religion.

They have not they think that oh, I'm an atheist.

You know, now I mastered the key to all you don't understand the unconscious dimension of religion.

If you're a Jewish atheist who has never inquired upon the mystical, you don't know what draws people to religion.

Because the unconscious dimension of Judaism.

is based in a shared

The covenant, that's what it is.

That's why Judaism doesn't matter if you believe in God or not, you're still in the covenant, right?

So that's the unconscious dimension.

Many atheist Jews do not understand.

That other religions also have an unconscious dimension and an and an understanding of the sacred.

But it's not rooted in a blood covenant, kuzats.

So, why is that important?

Why is that important?

That leads to a lot of Jewish new atheists to be really disgustingly disrespectful of people's sacred beliefs.

For them, the blood covenant of the Jewish people is unconsciously something very sacred.

They have not overcome that by being atheists, they still believe in it.

You know?

So they haven't actually struggled with their own religion to the point where they can say they're true atheists.

There is something they still unconsciously believe.

But if you're a a Christian or if you're a Muslim

The unconscious dimension of your religiosity is not based on something you can take for granted, as I was descended, this is my blood covenant.

Belief itself has an unconscious dimension.

So when a Muslim or a Christian becomes an atheist, they actually have to struggle with every aspect of their religiosity, right?

They have to like conf they have to actually wrangle with the sacred.

Many atheist Jews do not fucking do that.

And it's an implicit type of Jewish supremacism.

And it's not because they're maliciously evil.

Sorry to say, it's because a lot of them are stupid.

Like Bill Meyer.

A lot of arrogant, liberal Jewish atheists are fucking retarded.

They don't reckon with the metaphysical unconscious weight that they have carried over.

They think, oh, I'm just an atheist.

I don't believe in anything.

You do fucking believe, though.

You do believe in the chosen people thing.

You do.

Because the disproportionate, the double standards that you have when it comes to Israel versus other things, the double standard you have when it comes to the Holocaust versus other atrocities, you do still have some deep religiosity you've never questioned in your life.

If you're a Muslim atheist, every dimension of the sacred, you have to wrestle with that.

So that's why I don't like a lot of these, and I'm gonna say it, Jewish new atheist types that are trying to gatekeep the discourse in Marxism about religion, because they have not themselves confronted their own religiosity.

It's easy to be a Jewish atheist because in the religion itself, it doesn't matter if you believe in God or not, you're not going to go to hell if you're part of the covenant or whatever, right?

That's my criti I'm allowed to criticize anything I want.

That's my criticism.

But some mystical Jews who are self-aware about the belief side of the Jewish religion, who are who really understand the dimension of belief, they do respect the dimension of religiosity and actually understand what it is.

Walter Benjamin was one of those people.

I do like Walter Benjamin.

I hate the Frankfurt School.

But why do I hate the Frankfurt School?

Because Walter Benjamin was the only one who actually explored Judaism as a religion.

Adorno, Horkheimer, all of them were just kind of like.

They were like these secular they were LARPing.

They're not being honest with themselves.

Benjamin is looking into the Kabbalah, all this other kind of stuff.

So, Walter Benjamin is someone I like.

They don't have a covenant, they're cursed to atone for it until the Messiah arrives.

Chungaloid added fire to the warm chest every day.

I feel more and more like a big fat Jewish Chungus.

Um

Look guys, I

They don't have a tie to the covenant because the m it doesn't you're you're being like too

Lost in the sauce here.

It doesn't matter.

That's the thing.

It's like we we do kind of

You're getting high off your own supply type of thing.

It's like, look, it doesn't matter what you think, it's about what Jews actually believe.

I am someone who d I'm a Stalinist.

Stalin said you don't offend the religious feelings of the people.

I understand what religious people find sacred.

I understand what the sacral is.

What is the sacred?

I can recognize that in people and understand what that is for them.

What that means for you, it's not what it means for them.

You're saying they're reconstructing our lineage retrospectively, it's not personal.

You're wrong.

Jews do believe in the covenant unconsciously.

They do believe that there is something special about Jews.

Um

And that belief is even reinforced in the fact that Jewish people are so powerful and successful sometimes, right?

Why are ninety two percent of them Zionists?

I literally that you're confirming the argument yourself, because on an unconscious level

They believe in the covenant.

They believe in

The chosen people thing.

And the Zionist narrative is very compelling for them.

When the Zionists say,

Uh, if you don't rally, the Jews have been the story that they go it's that the Jews have been persecuted and oppressed everywhere.

Israel is the only protection the Jews will have.

Without it, there's going to be another Holocaust.

They tap into.

Let me ask you: you guys are so naive.

You know how I'm a fucking brutal truth bomb?

What a fucking nuclear correct understanding I have of the religious unconscious.

Why did the Jews, the atheist secular Jews, why did they choose Palestine?

They could have gone Madagascar, they could have gone South America, they could have gone somewhere in Africa.

Why did they choose Palestine?

They literally admitted it.

Because, however secular and atheist they were pretending to be, on an unconscious level, they did not reckon with the dimension of their own unconscious religiosity.

And there was my problem with secular and atheist Judaism.

Is that the way they pretend, the way they pretend that they've somehow overcome religion, and then they create these self-fulfilling prophecies where all of the beliefs and superstitions and prejudices of the Jews become confirmed.

And like, wow, I didn't know that.

I was an atheist the whole time.

It must be a miracle.

It must be testament to the proof that Judaism is true.

No, you set yourself up for a self-fulfilling prophecy.

When you decided Palestine, you literally meticulously conspired to take Palestine.

And then you have these secular Zionist Jews.

They go, wow.

Of all the places, looks like we've gone back to the land of Israel.

Maybe this is the promised land.

You didn't you you didn't fucking like walk your way into that on accident.

You chose that because you know do you guys understand what I'm saying here?

Do you understand what I'm saying here?

It's like they create self-fulfilling prophecies and then pretend the prophecy was fulfilled.

And it's somehow proof of the myst mysterious truth of the Jewish religion.

It's like, but you're just not being accountable or responsible for your actual faith in that religion.

You're pretending you have no faith.

You do have faith.

You're just not willing to confront it in any kind of way.

This is why I've never been in my life, even at the point when I was not a Marxist or left-wing at all, when I was like 10 years old, I have never been sympathetic with the racial view of Jews.

Because you are buying in to a religious belief when you do that.

When neo-Nazis and the right.

When they say, oh, the Jews, Kevin McDonald, like they have a group psychology.

There's a biological Darwinism.

That's what Tel Aviv believes.

They believe that.

You are.

Feeding into a delusion, in my opinion.

But if it's, I won't call it a delusion if it's an actually upfront acknowledged belief.

I will call it a delusion if we're gonna pretend I'm sick of the LARP.

I'm sick of the secular atheist LARP from Democratic Socialist, Jewish Democratic Socialists, and Zionists and all these other kinds of.

Atheist secular Jews, these new new atheist types.

It's like, look,

It's a belief.

It's a religious belief that you have.

I have my religious beliefs.

You have your religious beliefs.

This is not reality.

It's a belief.

Okay.

Christians believe in what they believe.

Jews believe in what they believe.

Muslims believe what they believe.

But it's rooted in belief.

It's not a self-evident truth, it's rooted in belief.

This is way because it's how you believe.

That's the sacred dimension of your religiosity and your religious unconscious.

It's rooted in your faith.

Not rooted in in in th the the only group I think maybe I could be wrong the only religion I think that pretends that disguises its religious beliefs in the secular garb, I think it's Jewish.

For example, Holocaust exceptionalism.

That is rooted in religious belief.

One, I would be willing to respect if it's acknowledged as religious.

But when we have to do hula hoops to pretend there's some kind of secular, rationalistic reason for why this event is uniquely the worst thing that's ever happened ever versus all the other atrocities, the genocide on the Indians, the genocide on other people, just admit there's a sacred dimension for you and that it's religious.

I have no problem with that.

I could respect that.

I can't respect religious beliefs lying about what they are and to themselves and pretending it's fucking secular because it's not.

The truth is, take it from me.

This is advice.

I'm a Muslim who actually became an atheist for a long time.

To wrestle with religious belief, truly, truly, to truly confront the depths of your own unconscious internal religiosity is very, very hard.

It's not easy.

Any new atheist who kicks their feet up and goes, religion is just a bunch of fairy tales, you're a fucking retard.

You're not confronting what religion is at all.

You're not confronting the dimension of actual faith at all.

You're confronting, you're not even touching on religion.

Religion is such a profoundly deep structure of the unconscious.

That you can be negligent and just kind of ignore it, but you need to be aware of how that influences you.

You need to be aware of how that biases you maybe.

And you need to be honest with yourself about what do I actually believe.

Um

I am biased toward Shia Islam, and I'm upfront about that.

I do believe it.

I see it.

I see how it, I mean, it makes sense to me for sure.

Um

Something about it very much is like clear to me, right?

Very lucidly clear to me.

But

Sometimes people never question their faith.

Sometimes people never think about their faith in reverse.

Sometimes, what people will do.

is they'll never actually think about what it means to hold a different religious belief than the one you have.

Why?

Because they lack the very vernacular, they lack the very experiential

Um

Dynamism or whatever to think about what it would mean to believe something other than what they do.

Because they're not being honest about what they believe in the first place.

They're pretending that they don't have any beliefs and that they're above having beliefs, but unconsciously you still have a belief and you're just not being upfront about it.

The Christians do the same fucking thing if I'm gonna be honest.

Now that I think of it, Christians do the same thing.

I'm gonna tell you guys something.

I want you to think very carefully about something.

When Christians oftentimes will say,

I've been in the highest theoretical

I'm not gonna like say this to brag, but I've just like I've been around people who are very

Up there in terms of like the theory academy world, whatever, when it comes to like very, you know, postmodern stuff, whatever.

Supposedly, the epitome of the most free-thinking cosmopolitan types.

You want to know how many people end up with the conclusion, like, oh my god, it's all Catholicism.

Deleuze.

The conclusion of like accelerationism, Deleuze, Attari, Georgia Bataille.

Oh my god, Heidegger.

Oh my God.

I think, guys, I think actually Catholicism might be the one and only true religion.

Dude, all of the people you're talking about were Catholic by birth.

Some of them went to fucking seminary school.

They were born in a Catholic country and in a Catholic civilization.

They were raised by Catholicism.

They're from Catholic.

Like, that's not an accident.

It follows logically that in a roundabout way, you can rediscover religion indirectly.

But I'm sick of people pretending like that's a fucking miracle.

If you live in a Christian country and you decide to become a fucking atheist and pursue any method of inquiry, then you have an epiphany because you realized in a roundabout way you've come back to Christianity.

Well, maybe religion was deeper than you thought it was.

Maybe it wasn't as fucking thin as some, like, oh, I believe in a fairy tale in the sky.

Maybe it's deeper than that.

Maybe you just weren't considering how deep religion goes.

And you're pretending like it's a fucking miracle that you've come full circle when it's not.

You've just never actually fucking reckoned with the depths of your own religious unconscious.

I might be the only fucking atheist in the world, if I'm going to be honest, because I'm the only one who will acknowledge a religious unconscious.

And the ability to acknowledge a religious unconscious means the ability to discriminate and say maybe this is wrong or maybe this is right, but I just because I have a religious unconscious doesn't mean my religion is true.

You can't just evaluate the truth of religion at the conscious level.

You have to reckon with the meaning on an unconscious level.

And I don't see enough people who do that.

I see too many people who have never actually struggled with their faith in their life, pretend that, oh my God, all my life was an atheist, but I found something.

You didn't find anything.

You took your culture for granted, you took your civilization for granted, or you took your own unconscious beliefs for granted.

Like, religion is much deeper.

It's much deeper than people think it is.

That's what I'm trying to say.

It's much deeper than people think it is.

Children should be, it's not possible to be free from belief.

I disagree with you.

I think the dimension of religiosity

The religious unconscious is a fundamental part of what a human being is.

And I will not confidently claim, I will never confidently assert and say.

Christianity is false, Islam is correct.

I can't say that.

The religious unconscious architecture of the nation that I'm in

Is Christian?

Even if I believe in Islam, there has to be a reason for why this architecture is Christian.

Now on a superficial level, telling people to renounce their beliefs doesn't mean they're actually renouncing their beliefs.

You're not even engaging with their beliefs.

You're not even understanding religion on the terms of religion.

You're understanding religion on the terms of some other kind of discourse, right?

I can never look at a religion and say you have no, you have nothing.

I can maybe look at a religion and say you have confusion and fuck it, I will say it.

I think what we call Hinduism.

I think a lot of that is confusion.

Hindus will protest at me and say, Haz, there's depth and there's there's depth in the Hindu religion.

There's depth yes, there's of course there's profound depth in the Vedas and so on and so on.

But how can we talk about a Hindu religion when in India itself you have a million different sects all worshipping different idols and temples?

And I saw there was a rat one.

Where is the center?

Where is this?

There's no unified Hindu religion.

There's no such thing.

So it's a series of.

Discombobulations, in my opinion, right?

Um China, it's the same thing.

China.

Is it a coincidence China's a Confucian civilization?

Of course not.

Oh, it's just a miracle Confucianism came back to China?

No.

Because even if they burned all these statues and stuff in the Mao era and if they loudly denounce Confucius all they want, you haven't breached the bedrock of the religious unconscious.

That is Confucianism.

So I ti that's why Stalin told Hoxha, he said, Never offend the religious beliefs of the people.

They're much deeper than you think.

And Stalin was speaking from experience when he said that.

He wasn't saying that because he has a soft spot for religious institutions.

He was speaking from experience.

He said, Look, it's much deeper than we thought it was.

It's much deeper.

If there's anything we've learned from Marxism, just take away that religion is much deeper, much deeper than what you might assume it is.

It goes much deeper.

If something is much more.

There, you know?

And even as Dugan said, even in the Soviet period, at the high point of the League of Militant Atheism, when they blew up the Church of the

Christ the Savior, I think they were doing stuff like that.

Dugan he candidly observes, he says, But this is actually part of the Orthodox tradition of the old believers and stuff.

It's very deep roots, actually, of this purifying fire, this rebirth, destroying the corruption as an actual act of faith.

It's like.

You may think that you're waging a war on religion, but all you're doing in a roundabout way

is reproducing or partaking in the religious unconscious.

Still

Enver you let me ask you a question.

No, no, let me ask you a question.

Enver hoja.

Was Enver Hoxha an atheist?

Okay, confessionally he was an atheist.

But look at Enver Hoxha's comprehension of Marxism-Leninism.

It is a purely moral one.

It's purely moral.

Enver hoja.

Had not one percent of pragmat pragmatism in his body.

He cut off the Soviets.

Then he cut off China.

For him, Marxism-Leninism was a pure belief, pure belief, and nothing else.

Pure moral North Star, pure moral.

He could renounce everything in the world.

He renounces the world.

He renounces pragmatism.

He renounces everything for in devotion to one thing, right?

Marxism, the correct principled line of Marxism-Leninism.

Now, confessionally speaking, that's quite atheist, that's quite materialist.

But.

But, okay, think about it deeper though.

Just think about what's going on.

Is it really atheist?

Or even materialist in the conventional sense?

Isn't that something profoundly spiritual, actually?

And

How can you look at that and not see Hoxha's own background, his family, tribal, ancestral background bleeding through that?

Because Hoxha was a Bektashi Sufi Shia.

It makes so much sense that Hoxha was a Sufi.

This is a classical Sufi asceticism.

Hoxha's uprightness of Marxism, Leninism, even regardless of the consequences, this is Sufi asceticism.

This is Bektashi Sufi.

This is like a Bektashi Janissary rebelling against Constantinople and planting their flag and saying, For Allah, I'm gonna die right here.

It's like, okay, you can use different words.

You could say it's Marxism-Leninism.

You could say it's the correct principled line.

But you're reproducing a very specific religious unconscious structure, which is very clear to me.

Uh Muslims have a cannibalistic turtle mosque in Bangladesh.

I it's the turtles who eating each other?

'Cause I'm not necessarily I don't think that's the worst thing.

In the world, if they're letting turtles eat each other, it's like that's the turtles' problem.

It's not a good example.

Best of mine, not a good example.

Yeah, exactly.

Exactly.

Guys, now you're seeing it.

Get Cambodia with Paul Pod.

You're telling me Paul Pot in Year Zero isn't Buddhism.

You must be not know anything about Buddhism.

You're telling me Paul Pot oh, they eat humans.

Oh, that's not n that's not good.

But you're telling me Paul Pot wasn't a Buddhist.

You're telling me Paul Pott wasn't a Buddhist?

What about DPRK?

You have to study the the Korean traditional uh

Folk religion, whatever it is, you have to study it.

For example, Mount Pectu, it has a profound, I think, spiritual significance for them.

Um

So, we have to think in a maybe in a materialist way.

What's the source of the religious unconscious?

I think.

That

This is a fundamental quality of of of um

The human

That we have to think of the religious unconscious.

Mm maybe it's not a structure, it's it's a pattern of some kind.

Which is preeminent and which precedes the emergence of a rational subject.

And there's no way to eliminate it.

There's no way to get rid of it.

There's no way to be free of it.

You you everyone believes in something, even if they deny it to themselves.

Like

Let me tell you something.

Do you know how many Muslim atheists don't eat pork?

There's so many Muslims who become atheists.

But they won't touch pork.

Why?

I think Žižek used to use the example of the Jew who doesn't eat pork for this.

But it's true, you know?

That's why when I meet Muslims that I yeah, I've met Muslims that eat pork and I just fucking look at them like they're fucking aliens from another plan.

I'm like, what the fuck is wrong with you?

When I s when I meet Muslims who eat pork, I literally like

That side eye is so crazy.

Like, you do something that changes how I look at you forever.

I'm like.

But what the fuck are you doing?

I told you they don't have reason.

No, yeah, I don't care about reason.

That's the thing.

Religion has nothing to do with reason.

You know, you you can't have pork if you're a Muslim.

You can't do it.

That's the one thing you can't do.

There's no Sufi in history who had pork.

Even bacon?

No, you can't.

It's like alcohol, other thi whatever, you know, you turn a blind eye Pork?

It's just a stereotype.

No, it's real.

We don't give a fuck about pork.

Who are you talking about, though?

Are you Muslim?

If you are a Muslim and you're saying you're okay with pork, I'm like.

You're a Muslim.

Yeah, bro.

Where the fuck are you from?

Where are you from?

What country?

Did Sufis have wine?

Yeah, wine is like turkey.

What?

Oh, I mean.

Bro, I feel like you're trying too hard.

It's like you're trying to be like, you're trying to just tell Europeans that it's okay, that you're one of them.

That must be it.

Just trying to prove how secular and European you are.

I get it.

The pork line is like crazy.

Christianity was always dialectical materialist.

But that you see my problem with you, IA, when you say that, is that you're saying something superfluous.

Where do you think dialectical materialism came from?

It's not a miracle that Christianity is dialectical materialist.

It's self-evident.

It's like it's a truism to me, that's what I mean to say, it's a truism.

It's a truism.

It's just a truism.

Of course it is.

Where did dialectics even come from?

The whole Hegelian dialectics is a way of expounding the Christian Trinity into the form of thought and consciousness.

The dialectical logic

Christianity is an expression of dialectical logic.

Keep reading.

No, I mean I I agree with you, but it's like it's not

Aristotelian Platonic metaphysics.

By the ruling aristocracy.

That's the origin of the Greco-Roman

That's the concept Marx was working from.

I one thousand percent agree with you, dude.

I'm I didn't even talk about dif differences in Christianity.

Marx was from Prussia.

He was he's he's from few he's from Prussia, okay?

He's writing in the context of not only Western Christianity, but yes, a Christianity that was shaped.

Um

You're not going to find an objection from me.

The only reason I'm a little upset sometimes is just like, give me the good faith that you understand that I already agree with that.

Like, it's, I'm taking that for granted.

Um.

I fully agree though, fully agree.

Uh the Islamic revolves into pork is so strong that when there's black Muslims in a black community, the black people stop eating pork.

Maybe that's uh ancestral memory of uh the

When black people were Muslim.

Back in the day in Africa.

Who knows?

Yemeni sandwich store owners mostly serve bacon.

I I'm the only Muslim who's held out, I guess.

Everyone's just eating pork now.

Mark my words.

Mark my words, I'm going to be vindicated.

Y'all are going to get some fucked up.

I'm not going to have pork.

I'm not going to cross that line.

I'm not crossing that line.

I don't care what the trends are.

I'm gonna stay

Stay solid.

I sound like a fucking retard right now because I've been really writing uh this Marxism is Islam thing and um it's much more eloquent when it's put into writing.

But uh

I have a theory of where the unconscious dimension of religiosity comes from.

But let me tell let me just warn you with one thing.

If there's one true religion, if there is one true religion.

If there is one true religion, whatever that religion is.

has to itself acknowledge

Or make sense of the dimension of the religious unconscious.

And in my opinion, and this may be a challenge for you if you disagree with me, but this is my opinion, and I'm allowed to have it.

I don't see a self-awareness of that dimension outside of Sufism.

Meaning, for some reason, only Islam and Sufism in particular creates the awareness of the unconscious dimension of religion.

That there can be many, many different religious beliefs you hold unconsciously.

And that the inquiry upon the nature of faith does not simply happen.

At the

Uh conscious level.

Maybe, maybe the monks in Mount Athos

Absolutely prove me wrong.

I don't know enough.

I'm not familiar enough with those traditions.

This is all explained in Kusa's Double Pyramid.

That's the mime.

I don't want to fucking hear this LaRouche garbage.

About the fucking how the Italian Renaissance, those guys fucking figured it all out.

They stole everything from the Silk Road.

They stole everything.

They stole everything from the fucking Abbasids and shit.

And it was a secondhand sloppy rendition of what was fucking going on in El Andalus.

And they just took it and made it.

Rationalistic and bullshit.

It's like dude

The Italian Renaissance people did not fucking, you know, figure it all out.

It's bullshit.

Okay.

As a matter of fact, I think during the Italian Renaissance, a lot of those Italians, I think what they were doing is they were worshiping fucking geometrical demons.

That's what I think.

I think they were worshiping some kind of Pythagorean, geometrical, fucking demonic thing.

And that's Spinoza's substance.

And there's a really dark undercurrent in the Italian Renaissance.

Those scary ass people with those fucking masks and shit, like the eyes wide shut.

Some kind of geometrical

God of geometry.

Yeah, I don't trust none of that.

The Medicis and all them scary ass people, I don't trust none of that.

Keep that away from me.

They were all usurers.

They were all usurers.

There's something satanic about the Italian Renaissance, 100,000%.

Because if you actually look into it,

During the Italian Renaissance,

They replicated the Asiatic model of benefactors and the arts and stuff, but it was all done by the private sector now.

The bankers were so fucking powerful.

They were doing something that previously only like a Sultan could do, right?

And it's like these bankers were having the Eyes Why It Shut mask.

They're probably sacrificing babies and shit.

Who fucking knows?

Scary ass Italian Renaissance.

I should be running graduate seminars.

I was thinking about.

Okay, once it's a good idea.

I was thinking about becoming

Professor

Jiang Aldeen.

In the other room, I have a lot of room.

I can set up a whiteboard.

I can get a camera.

I can do the whiteboard thing.

And I can be like Professor Jiang.

I can just, because you know, I always do the Microsoft paint streams.

How easy it would be to just have a whiteboard.

If I could teach you guys using a whiteboard, I could fucking cook.

Okay?

I love the Microsoft paint thing.

Whiteboard would be fucking cool, right?

Call yourself an imam.

You think I won't?

You think it's a joke to me?

I have no problem doing that, Imam Haas.

I have no problem.

Professor Jong Imam Haz, the Sufi Sheikh, the Sufi teacher.

And I can go viral.

But I don't wanna be.

You know, there's something, I don't like this.

There's something about this I don't like, because

It just connotes a type of

like a fat guy drinking tea, just like a fat guy.

Like these guys were not exercising.

They were sitting around being fat and they had their feet up on the floor.

And like, that's not the type of person I want to be.

What happened to athleticism?

What happened to the warrior ethos?

So I need that's something else Islam does not have, that Christianity has.

Maybe it's different now because of the Ertugal series in Turkey, but Islam, the aesthetics, are very much a lazy fat ass who's just sitting around, just be like, oh, go with the fuck.

I'm so wise.

It's like, you're just sitting around being a fat ass.

Very sedentary.

Yeah, something ironically very sedentary.

But Christianity is the religion.

Where you're like, for he's like, we do it for Christ, and then you fucking jump in an ice bath.

You fucking open ice and you jump in an ice bath, get fucking baptized like the Russians do.

And then even Protestants, they're like, they put, they endure the suffering, they put themselves through hardship.

They're, they're, um,

Strong, they lift, you know?

They go to the gym, they work out, and it's like.

Islam is lacking in that department severely, severely right now, you know, and uh

Um

Isn't that interesting?

I think Islam doesn't emphasise suffering enough.

Too much leisure, not enough suffering.

That would be my criticism.

Uh too much leisure, too much

Too much leisure.

Rabbis have the same fat spirit.

What's your favorite denomination of Christianity?

Uh good old fashioned baptism or maybe Mormonism.

I like the American Baptist style, honestly, it's my favorite.

Lutheran?

Yeah, it's it's more German, you know.

Um, I like the Baptist.

Church, American Baptist Churches.

Calvinism, I'm not a fan of Calvinism.

Why Baptist?

I asked as a form of Baptism.

Because it's unpretentious.

Because it's simple and it's unpretentious.

Because anyone can just set up a Baptist church anywhere.

And I think it's not hierarchical either.

And it's just purely the gospel.

It's purely just.

They're singing, whatever, but it's just it's a it's very pure to me, you know?

There's a pur there's a s there's a uh non-pretentiousness, there's a simplicity and there's a purity that I uh like a lot.

It was big in the Wild West.

Yeah.

No, no, I I think baptism is a I like it.

This whole stream was about religion, that's crazy.

What about the snake Christians?

I I don't know.

I don't fucking know.

It's too simple.

I like it because it's simple actually, I like it.

Maybe my goal is somehow to

combine like Islamic metaphysics and cybernetics.

It's like that is the cross section that my mind is going toward.

And it's like it's

Um

If I could just present to you how I think what Islam is, I think you would understand where I'm coming from.

It's like, I'm not talking about a religion, I'm talking about.

Uh

I'm talking about an understanding.

Let's call it an understanding.

I think it's an understanding that's been missing too long.

It's like um

Is Shuism more leisure than suffering?

No, it's more suffering, but I don't like the thing where they cut themselves.

I don't like that.

The the the real belief I have okay.

Should I not be scared to say?

Perhaps it's time to have a new word.

Like, it's a type of cosmism that I believe in.

That's just the truth.

I believe in a cosmism that is.

Perhaps compatible with Islam?

But

At what point am I just out?

You know, at what point am I out?

But I was thinking about when I was on the airplane.

No, not Hegel.

Not Hegel.

I was on the airplane, it was like the Cosmism thing made me fearless.

So I'm like

The cosmism thing.

Bro, fuck off with the fucking pyramids, dude.

I don't fucking care about these circles and pyramids.

You ever go to mosque or is it more personal?

No, I don't.

Honestly, I don't.

Maybe what I believe is just there's not a word for it.

Maybe I'm not a Muslim, but there's just like no word for what I believe.

Maybe that's the case.

I don't know.

I think of myself as a Muslim.

He's pro-Israel deal I don't know, I whatever.

Honorism?

No.

Uh Johnny, what's up man?

Appreciate you.

Moppinism.

I would never invent my own religion.

That's the problem.

I would never do that.

But, uh,.

You know.

Communist?

Yeah, that's a given, but what what even is that?

You know, what is the unconscious dimension of that?

Naturalism?

No.

Nope, I definitely uh think no, not naturalism.

Realism?

No.

Honestly, it's Cosmism.

That's what I really fuck with.

Cosmism.

Dark Mali.

You never discuss Reza.

I I don't I haven't um kept up with Reza in a long time.

The last time I

uh kept up with Rezzo was when I read Intelligence and Spirit, but he has changed, I think, since then.

I don't know.

Where is he?

What is he doing?

I don't know.

I haven't been I haven't been following

Dark mind I mean, it's not really religion though, is it?

He released Abducting the Outside finally two years ago.

That I was remembering that was like that was something that was taking a long time to finish.

Well, I should get that one.

You were uh recommended a lecture on AI by Rezza recently.

Tortapounder 3000 added 10 to the Warchest TikTok debates incoming.

Guys, you really want TikTok debates at midnight?

Yes, really?

I mean this late though?

Alright, fine.

Ones if you want TikTok debates.

I'll do it.

Alright, we'll do it.

You guys, uh, we did a whole religion deep stream.

Yo

Hit Cal D, what's up, man?

Alright.

If this uh

Alright, we'll do it.

Fuck it.

What could we ball?

TikTok is preparing.

Oh, and I'm going to freeze.

Oh, and I'm going to freeze.

And I'm going to freeze.

That's worth it by moving Running.

Y'all are easy to entertain like children, you know that?

Y'all are easy to entertain like children.

Oh, just like so easy to entertain.

Vital transgender

Didn't we have this person on before?

Yo.

Haz, bro, why did you crash out during one of the meetings, bro?

Why'd you crash out during an ACP meeting, bro?

I looked up everything, bro.

Why you?

Your entire movement is inherently opportunist, bro.

Why?

I don't need to explain that to you, bro.

Yeah, well you why not?

I mean, what are you trying to say then?

What do you want?

Huh?

They just left, all right, I mean like what do you

What's what was your point?

Alright.

Why did I crash out?

Why would I not crash out in that situation?

Who wouldn't?

Go ahead, big guy.

So hey, uh hey Haas.

So I was just wondering, did you say Islam is cult like culturally closer to communism or No, not culturally closer.

I was trying to be more nuanced and it was a complicated thing.

Basically, what I'm saying is that Marxism is Islam directly.

Not just culturally, but literally.

Okay, I'll have to go watch that video and come back.

No, no, I'm just saying it now.

Well, okay, so, but I feel like Islam.

What is this music?

I hold on, I gotta leave.

What?

It wasn't my move.

Liam, go ahead.

Joe has.

Yeah.

You remember me, bruh?

No.

No.

Your nose is fucked up and you're chopped as fuck, bro.

You're a Nick Fuentes fan?

Yeah, you're not.

Okay.

What does that mean?

Tyler Robinson was ACP.

Tyler Robinson was ACP.

Okay, you can keep repeating that, but what is your observation supposed to do for me here?

Like, what am I supposed to take from that?

I don't know.

Probably kill yourself.

Yeah, but why would I be upset in any kind of way based on what you think about my appearance?

You should be upset.

Yeah, I had to remove them because my restrictions got limited, even though I had the muted, it still restricted my thing.

Once again, if you're a man who is a not straight man as well, because you're a Nick Fuentes fan, and you come and you comment on my appearance.

But what is the net effect?

How should I react genuinely?

If a woman who I'm attracted to

Tells me that I am physically, you know, this or that, she's attracted, she's flirting with me for sure.

Because why would you talk like that, right?

So, that would even that wouldn't bother me.

But, what's the proof is in the pudding, you know.

If what you're saying, okay, if I like a woman and uh, she doesn't like me because my appearance, well, the proof would be in the pudding.

Like, what do you want me to say?

But for you to come on, for you to come and talk to me about how you think I look, tell me what I'm what is that supposed to do?

What is my reaction supposed to be?

Do you have no self-awareness about how like weird and fruity that is of you?

My life got restricted, so we have to restart this.

You have no motion, you have nothing.

Why are you here then?

Why are you here then?

You pathetic twerp.

You're nothing.

You're a fan of Nick Fuentes, what can I say?

Why are you you're literally like not even human in my eyes?

I want you to understand that.

I'm not even saying that to be mean.

Do you believe me when I say, Liam, when I say that you are not human to me?

Like, I see you like a talking animal.

You're not human to me, so why are you like what are you what do you mean?

What do you mean to communicate?

What do you mean to communicate?

By typing in my chat, I don't see you as human.

I'm gonna I'll end it and restart it 'cause I got restricted 'cause this uh Liam

This Liam guy, he's like, um

Not heterosexual.

And he is a uh griper.

Alright, I started again.

On a fresh basis.

And you want it by moon, no no no no.

Yo, what do you want?

Uh hello.

Yo, what do you want?

Uh I'm kind of news communism, but I feel like communism's meant to be socially progressive and it's meant to culturally be on like the side of the LGBTQ and stuff.

Okay, so when in history has it been?

Uh Cuba.

Okay, so you have one example?

Oh, well, I mean, even Stalin was socially progressive.

He believed in the liberation of women.

He also believed in the liberation of people of color at a time where that wasn't a social norm.

But you're assuming that there's a broad spectrum called social progressiveness, and Stalin ranks high on that.

And that's the operating, governing logic for why Stalin affirmed the rights of women or rejected racism, because he's operating according to the logic that ends with the LGBT movement and social progressivism.

But Stalin is operating from a different logic than progressivism, as you would call it, liberal progressivism.

Stalin doesn't believe that the maximization of people's individual choices and identities consists with liberation.

Stalin's a materialist who comprehends the fact that materialism is the realization of people's innate necessity and ability.

Now, Stalin comprehends that men and women are both functioning parts of socialist society with roles to play, but the opening of education and opportunity and the ability for women to be politically equal, formally equal, but also have economic opportunities that men also have.

That's consistent with the governing principles and logic that has guided Marxism from the beginning.

That's not Stalin being, oh, he's more progressive for his time or something.

No, he's being consistent with the logic of how Marxism treats social questions.

That's why Stalin doesn't say Uzbekistan is not ready for women's liberation.

Uzbekistan was much more backward than Russia was.

It wasn't urbanized.

It wasn't industrialized.

It was extremely backward.

And yet, Stalin in Uzbekistan is promoting the same policy of the advancing of women's status as he is in Russia.

So the argument that Stalin is not promoting LGBT rights because he's a creature of his time ignores that in Marxism, there's an operating and governing logic for why it pursues the policies that it does, which has no relationship to American style or liberal progressivism and so on and so on.

It has its own views on these different issues because it operates according to a different understanding of how history develops.

Well, I just feel like, I mean, even Engels, even though he was homophobic, he wrote, what we can now conjecture about the way in which sexual relations will be ordered after the impending overthrow of capitalist production is mainly of a negative character.

Correct.

And then he then says a future generation of men and women would form relations based on real love.

He understood that capitalism forms relations in a way which isn't how it's meant to be.

Why does it not apply to the LGBTQ?

No, I understand that you may interpret from you're interpreting Lenin Engels' words because you're living in America today and you're looking at all these new trends and stuff and you're saying, oh, he must be talking about swingers or something.

But understand that Engels and Marx were operating within a framework of strict naturalism, which means although they didn't attribute fixed roles with respect to the division of labor to men and women, they did comprehend men and women within the framework of Marx's materialist humanism and naturalism, right?

So.

Not me, but this is what Engels thought, okay.

I don't know if you're familiar with it.

It's it's not that he was homophobic.

Engels had a reason for believing, according to his own operating logic, that alternative sexualities were a form of decadence because it was a.

Degradation of the human as such.

Because Marx and Engels both did believe in a natural human, right?

They did believe in such a thing as a natural human.

Yes, historically constituted, historically specific, and so on and so on.

But they still affirmed a notion of the human that more or less was consonant with principles and laws of nature.

And for Engels, progress corresponded to the ability for that human essence to be realized and affirmed to a greater extent than it could be in class societies.

Not fundamentally transformed, and not human beings becoming another species, not so fundamentally.

Changing that it's unrecognizable in terms of the nature part, right?

Um

That's the framework they were operating in.

Don't shoot the messenger, you know.

That's just what Engels thought.

Well, I mean, I think you've gone beat on those two, but my last question would be trans and uh gay people are a part of the proletariat, so why are they not people whose rights we should be fighting for as well?

Well, what rights do you think we ne we need to fight for on their behalf?

Uh I think everyone has the right to love whoever they want to love, no matter their sexuality.

Uh w but but we haven't we're not trying to restrict what ad what private adults try to do in their well, I mean, I think I see a lot of stuff about the ACP online saying that like you're homophobes.

I've seen some tweets from Jackson Hink or something.

You have to understand that these people consider it homophobic if you

don't believe that, you know, um, five-year-olds should be taught about um sex acts and graphic detail when they're in school or something.

So, you know, they have a very different understanding of what you know, these canceled culture words are used to describe.

There's a very

It has nothing to do with what a reasonable person would understand as hateful.

Yeah, I understand where you're coming from, Ben.

I also just wanted to tell you, I watched your debate with Prax Ben yesterday.

And it was uh pretty interesting.

And yeah, I'm quite a big fan of yours, so thank you.

Alright, yeah, for sure.

Boom hair.

Yeah, I didn't even catch he did use AI during that debate.

I never caught that because I wasn't familiar with AI babble.

But now that I am.

I'm like

Get bounded by Mo.

Na na na na.

Na na na na na.

I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the Praxband guy.

Alright, this is a scary looking person, so let's just go.

Rejected racism because he's operating according to the logic that ends with the LGBT movement and social progressivism.

But Stalin is operating from a different logic than progressivism.

Dude, what?

Mute yourself.

I'm sorry, there's something else playing.

Sorry, I'm a bit new to TikTok.

Can you hear me?

Stalin's a materialist who comprehends the fact.

Yeah, I can hear you.

I'm just going to have to go even though there's something playing if you can hear me all right.

I wanted to follow up on the debate you had recently about intersectionalism that I saw.

And I wanted to say first of all that I appreciate your perspective and I appreciate your content and I wasn't a particular fan of the caller, but I wanted to do better justice to something like their position, though not identical to it.

And I wanted to say that I think it is worth when you talk about transgender issues, when you talk about sexual deviance generally, I think it's worth approaching the subject

With a sort of understanding in the back of your mind at least that I mean transgender people for instance do I mean under the prejudices that most people harbor toward transgender people do at least find themselves at risk of serial serious marginalization and are often in practice seriously marginalized on the basis of their identity.

Uh okay.

What

Okay, I mean there's many unfortunate things to happen to many people for many different reasons.

Amputees, for example, are pretty marginalized.

People that suffer dwarfism are quite marginalized.

Yeah.

There are certain things that people people who have medical problems.

You know, there's so many things that can make someone feel more unfortunate socially on a cultural level.

Um absolutely.

I would agree and I and I think that you know uh people who suffer dwarfism or people who are uh disabled in some form or fashion are like well within their will well within reason to advocate for themselves the the same way that a lot of transgender people do.

Um you would you had asked her um at some point in the debate um you know like like what what actually goes wrong with transgender people or how they suffer under um uh under the present sort of cultural zeitgeist.

And you know, I I think that it is I think that it is comparable.

I said a whole lot of people suffer for a whole lot of different reasons, but that doesn't mean it's a category of oppression relevant to a revolutionary cause.

That I understand, and I understand to eliminate all suffering on earth.

I understand that, and I understand the need to be accommodating of certain cultural attitudes held by a broad swath of working people who might be interested in participating in your movement.

But at the same time, I think that it's important to at least distinguish the moralistic sort of petty strain of transactivism from the advocacy of trans people for themselves in a similar fashion as disabled people might advocate for themselves when it comes to issues like V-coding in prisons, for example.

What?

when it comes to issues like V-coding in prisons, which is I mean, the arrangement of things the arrangement of things in American prisons at least, so that for example, particularly violent prisoners are um are placated by um uh

Bye.

transgender prisoners as sorts of sex slaves.

I mean, that's really messed up.

I mean, I'm totally against that, you know, but

I I think that's horrific, you know, but

I once again don't know what you're trying to get at here.

It's like that's pretty horrific.

And uh the US prisons are pretty horrific.

I I think the way that you t the way that you talk about transgender activism is uh absolutely it oppresses the whole population and it's like

I just I don't see why a dr

Opposing these horrific things it's doesn't mean you have to

Wave specific flags that represent specific sexual identities, you know.

Um

Definitely not.

Um

Yeah, definitely not, but um t I'm sorry, I'm a little bit nervous if you can't tell.

Yeah.

I guess what I what I want I've I it's I've always gotten the impression that the way that you talk about

trans issues or trans advocacy in general.

could sort of dignify this this indifference toward the very real sufferings of a marginalized group.

No, I don't I mean um

Well like look

Indifference to suffering is a

Most people go about their life indifferent to the suffering of the people around them in general.

and the majority of people in general.

But if you're a Marxist, you know, you're going to understand oppression in a very immediate concrete sense.

Which is at the register of politics, economics.

Um

But just paying acknowledgement to people suffering is not really

I mean, what what does that do?

What what is the point of that?

Really think about it.

Like, what what does that actually do?

Okay, it makes you feel worse, makes you understand that things are bad and it's whatever, but it's like does that in and of itself accomplish anything?

Well, I I think it does accomplish something.

I guess that's the reason why I bring it up.

I don't I d I don't know does it though?

Does acknowledging suffering do much?

Or does alleviating materially the conditions of suffering do do things?

What what actually accomplishes something?

I think that it would accomplish something insofar as well insofar as there are a lot of

transgender people out there who who are under the impression that you are a legitimately transphobic person, not in any way concerned with the sufferings of transgender people, because of the way that you use or refer to um transgender activists or transgender activism generally to make a point about um

To make a point about the sort of petty, um moralistic

strain of politics that defines that defined woke won as we call it now in retrospect.

I well, look, people can perceive me however they want to perceive me.

Um

You know, I I just I I reject the premise that

You know, we

Can somehow personally attend to everyone suffering, you know?

And, uh,

And there's so much like subjective recognition.

It's like the whole validation thing.

It's like I just

I just don't think in that way in in general, you know?

I feel there's a strong obligation to the fulfilment of the mission of a class and of a history, but

I can't personally give people, you know

I can't personally alleviate someone's suffering.

I just can.

I can help people try to make sense of the world that they live in.

I can try to help people find purpose and meaning in that world.

An understanding of uh what does it mean to live a meaningful life in some ways, but

Can I personally, you know, solve your suffering?

No.

I really can't.

So I don't really see like this whole thing.

I'm indifferent to people suffering.

Well, it's like.

I cannot solve your suffering.

I don't think anyone can do that actually.

Yeah, you could say it's like a bootstraps individualistic mentality, but I do believe only you can solve your suffering, actually.

And I would agree with that.

When I have been suffering in my life, I never looked to anyone to help me.

Nobody helped me.

When I'm suffering in my life, I mean, who who is being different?

Because I guess different is the opposite of indifferent.

Who's paying attention to me?

No one.

It's no one's business but mine.

It's my issue to deal with.

It's my problem to solve.

So, why should I have to be responsible for?

You can't.

People have to deal with it themselves, you have to deal with your own problems.

Well, to an extent of course, we all have to deal with our own problems and we all have to rely on ourselves.

have an obligation to recognize each other this or that way.

It's like

Um

This is like a politics of care, you know, and it's I don't buy it.

I don't buy it.

Because even if we're, sorry.

Even if we're capable of handling our own suffering.

I'm not Dumbledore.

I don't like this Harry Potter thing.

I'm not Dumbledore.

And neither was Karl Marx.

I'm not Dumbledore, neither was Karl Marx.

I'm not here to be Harry Potter, here for Harry Potter.

Oh, you're suffering.

Let me recognize you.

I'm not Dumbledore, neither was Karl Marx, and neither was anyone else in history who was.

involved in communism.

You know, this is like Harry Potter shit, where you just want you just want a big validating someone to help you and recognize you.

That's there's no such thing.

There's people who will try to exploit you and take advantage of you.

when you try to depend on them in this way, that you don't know, that you're

You don't know them.

All you could do is count on two things: yourself and the people that you know.

That's it.

I'm not proposing the obligation to make people feel this or that way.

No, I'm not proposing that you have the obligation to have the cure for everybody's suffering or to be the rock that somebody else leans on.

Because ultimately, an individual person is capable and it is their responsibility to handle their own suffering.

But when you think about when you involve yourself with a political organization like the American Communist Party, I don't think that a transgender person, for instance, joins that party believing that it will be complicit in the suffering of people like them, you know, for an indefinite length of time should they succeed, because they're willing to harbor or to

offer sympathy to backwards cultural attitudes that that cause real issues.

I mean, such issues are so minuscule to me compared to the things that actually matter, to be honest.

I just have to be blunt about it.

There are, of course, 8 billion people in the world.

Like, out there.

You know, it's like, have we achieved.

Have we already overthrown U.S.

imperialism and the genocide of people worldwide?

And have we gotten to a point where people can just like actually have health care and live a normal life?

Have we gotten to such a point where now we could just dwell upon the meticulous details of how unfair our society can sometimes be to some of the most marginalized people?

It's like.

I reject this Zionism, and that's what I'm going to call it.

It is this form of Zionism that says until the Goyim prove that they can comprehensively solve every possible unfair thing, even at the smallest level, they are unworthy of the basic foundation of being able to breathe.

Like, until the Goyim prove that they're moral and pure enough to comprehensively show that they're so pure on every single issue, I'm against them.

Having the ability to, you know, afford to have a house or afford to have a roof over their head.

I just think it gets things backwards, you know, just so fundamentally backwards.

Well, there there are eight billion people in the world and yeah, I under absolutely understand where you're coming from.

It's not a job of human beings to prove that they're worthy of liberation.

Because if there's a c there's there's a clear oppression at hand.

And it's not on the job of the oppressed to prove that they're worthy of liberation from oppression.

They'll fight for their liberation and they're not going to care what you think about it.

And uh they can be imperfect and they can be unfair on a personal level.

In all sorts of different ways.

Think back to the October Revolution in 1917.

How many of the people in the crowds who participated in the October Revolution of 1917, how many of those people personally were fair to everyone in their life?

How many of them were completely

Devoid of any sexism or misogyny, or how many of them were so morally pure?

On how many of them were devoid of religious or racial prejudices?

That's the people as they are, as they are, not as you wish them to be, not as you want them to be, that's how they are.

Now if you think that there's injustice and there's a lack of fairness, that has to be litigated by the people.

But I see a debate happening in America where some people assert that unless elementary schools institutionalize the recognition of seventy five genders, that we are being unfair and unjust.

I reject that.

So you see there's the extremism that made it it's not that there was such a corruption and uh inertia of injustice that oh everyone's turning a blind eye.

No, you tried to say that this earth it's unjust that

you know, there's all these microaggressions.

It's it's like it's extremism.

It's it's attempting to litigate justice and a lack thereof on a basis that is so far removed from the reality.

of human association.

Self.

I don't want to come across as one more as one more person calling in to scold you or to scold or scold people for not being sufficiently validating of trans identities.

And I don't think that an organization should stake its success.

Yeah, I'm sorry, man, but you talk really slowly, so I just have to debate this guy.

Capitalist.

Go ahead, capitalist, whatever your name is, go ahead and request, since you're talking about how I'm scared to debate you.

Oh look, he's nowhere to be found.

He's not in the guest requests.

Nowhere to be found.

Okay, you ran away.

Good job.

Mills, go ahead.

Hey, can you hear me?

Yeah.

Well, my bad.

Um

All right.

Um, so I'm a DSA guy.

Uh, I campaign for Zora Mandani.

I'm very in I'm like very into like hearing what you have to say about all that.

I'm very new to the ACP.

I just wanna hear what you say.

Would you differ from the DSA?

Well, uh we're a party, for sure.

Um

That's another thing, but we have a strategy that's focussed on preparing for

A much more long term understanding of the nature of US politics in the sense that these wins that are happening in New York City are not going to be able to scale nationwide, and even if they could,

Eventually the Democratic Party's gonna crack down on you and make it impossible.

Uh to participate in elections.

And so, maybe the strong point of emphasis right now should not be elections, but building dual power, right?

Some kind of

Um

economic material existence in this country

That

is strong and continuously prominent enough in people's lives

That the ability to fund independent political campaigns, the ability to gain a foothold with the masses, the ability to build alternative

you know, sources of authority within communities.

I think that right now the ACP is mainly distinguished because of that strategy.

You know, it's mainly the dual power strategy.

It's like.

Look, I understand the realities of politics.

I'm not here to be a moral

Moralist.

But it's a fact that Momdani's campaign depended on financial support in the beginning.

Now at the end he got a lot of donations, I understand, but in the beginning

You have a lot of a you have a political electoral ecosystem.

It's very fluid, working families party, all these NGOs, all these different PACs and stuff.

And if you're not aligned with those institutions,

You get cut off.

You have no access.

And if you don't have that, you're not able to run in elections.

Yeah.

But that comes at the cost of having independence, you know, political independence.

And so.

I think the DSA itself is reaching the limits of how much it can continue to tap in and pool from those resources.

When the time comes that it gets expelled entirely, like what what then?

I think you're 100% right.

Like, I'm scared of what happens when, after the DSA gets kicked out of Congress, after the DSA, the Krempire can go down entirely.

What I foresee is a far-right takeover, and I'm just tired of it.

Like, my parents, my friends, my family, I'm tired of seeing them go down the far-right pipeline.

I can't do it anymore.

I just want to see.

Right.

Hearing you tonight has been great.

Uh I think the ACP is a viable option for them.

Yeah, I mean, you know, the thing is, it's like

I think that when push comes to shove, the DSA

I'm not a fan of the D S A, but I I can be realistic when I say I think Trump is going to go very hard on them.

And we're going to be looking at potentially what what is what are the limits of what he's going to be able to get away with

you know, invoking the the threat of communism and stuff.

It's very clear what he's trying to do with that.

But when push comes to shove, I don't think the Democrats are gonna go to war with Trump and start a civil war to protect the DSA.

I think what they're going to do is isolate the DSA.

I think the DSA doesn't have enough of a stronghold among the proletariat, the masses, you know, especially in the flyover states where they're swing states, you know.

But that's how they can gatekeep the left.

The truth is, the majority of the working class or the proletariat, they're tied at the hip to institutions and media that's controlled by either the Republicans or the Democrats.

And the Democrats and Republicans fight over influencing them.

But to have that level of influence, you have to have trillions.

You have to have access to the same.

uh finances that that the mainstream parties have.

The DSA has built its own independent revenues through dues, and it has media support from Hassan Piker for sure.

And it's exhausted the limit of how much it can infiltrate some of these institutions, I think.

But when push comes to shove, if the Democrats have to just kick the DSA out and put an end to the whole thing, the DSA hasn't built enough of a stronghold among the masses to be able to resist that, I don't think.

Um, it's really the organization at the bottom that I think has not reached the point of mass politics yet.

And

If the D S A could achieve that, I would be happy about it, but I'm not confident in that because I think um

I think that that would require a level of discipline and coherence when it comes to the national strategy, the line, and so on and so on, which I don't think DSA organizationally has.

I'm not one-sided about the DSA, by the way.

I understand there's some strengths actually to their model of how hyper-decentralized they are, how pragmatic it is, where they don't care about your ideology.

It's just and somehow they manage to all unite on, you know, regardless of that.

There's a strength to that.

You know, they avoid the sectarianism.

But at the same time, it's like

To build a foundation that's independent, that will be able to not depend on ruling institutions, political institutions.

I think you gotta get down and dirty, you know so to speak.

You gotta

You gotta go down to the small towns, you gotta like plant yourself, you gotta make strongholds.

Because if you get kicked out of the to the

The towers on top or whatever.

You get kicked out of these citadels of power where the institutions are.

Or co-opted, which happened, I think, with AOC and Bernie.

But if you get kicked out, you know, like, what are you gonna do?

You're basically homeless.

So

It's more or less kind of what I think.

It's like, uh

I think what's going on is is good in the sense of it's shifting the Overton window and it's helping organizations like the ACP, but

I have a very long term understanding of what I anticipate will come of this, and that's really what I feel it's necessary to to responsibly prepare for, you know?

Just one last question before I leave.

I'm like very new to the ACP.

Like I like figured out about you guys like a week ago.

I've been looking into you

Is Hinkle a member?

No, Hinkle's is Hinkle a member?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I've been looking to you, I've been looking to Hinkle, like all great guys, like

I've I'm also a history major at school.

Um how do you guys stand on like the revolution or like all this stuff?

I know that it's like very far fetched right now with like the flock and all this stuff.

It's it's hard to even think about it.

But like if it would happen, where do you guys stand?

Something like that's inevitable.

I think Civil War and Revolution would be the same thing.

Uh I don't think anyone's gonna take power.

On the backs of a revolution right now.

Um we're definitely not ready to lead any kind of revolution.

If one was to emerge, we would not I don't know how confident I would be in our ability to to be there like Lenin was in October.

So I think if one happened, it would just lead to civil war and chaos.

But tho those are the kind of conditions we're preparing for as a party.

We're preparing for some kind of

Um deep political and economic instability in this country.

It's it's great to hear that.

Like, seeing what's happening at like Delaney Hall, seeing what's happening with all these ice ice guys coming into our neighborhoods, taking everybody, I'm tired of it.

I think it's inevitable.

I'm just happy to hear it from an actual person that cares.

For sure.

All right, man.

Well, ACP.us, if you ever think about wanting to look into us more or joining.

All right, thank you so much.

I don't know how to weed exactly.

You can just kick me off.

Thank you so much.

All right.

Uh

Alright y'all, I'm tired as hell.

It's Pilgrim Guy who's gonna say bad words.

Yo.

Yo.

Yo.

Can you hear me?

Yeah.

Alright.

Um so I wanted to talk about you know communism isn't culturally liberal and I do agree because I had this argument with this uh trans person the other day and they were saying you know so you agree, that's great.

All right guys, we're ending the TikTok live because there's only forty people in it.

Guys, I told you it was too late for a TikTok live, alright?

Told you it's too late.

We're not gonna get good content this late.

So we'll have to wait till tomorrow or the day after.

All right.

Bye, guys.

Hopefully, we'll have an earlier stream.

Bye-bye.

See y'all tomorrow.