Absolutely Sickening Vaush Fan [WARNING: DISTURBING]

2021-10-23
trends issues why
um
because that's what i usually talk about
on here um i joined the server
i do i want that's what i talk about
i mean that's what i talk about oh okay
yeah um i joined the server because i
saw i think i saw a video against um
or it was you and perspective philosophy
um
and then
i watched that debate and then i watched
some other ones um and it seems like you
kind of have this like
um
the kind of aesthetic of like a alpha
bro male that's trying like way too hard
it's a little cringy um but then i kind
of went to the community and i mainly
disagree with the community i'm not sure
if you
agree with their takes um but
essentially
i think that
we should
allow children
to receive hormone blockers
um and if like doctors agree we should
probably allow them to
get um
yeah i uh
i just don't agree with you
yeah i just don't agree with that it's
okay so what do you not agree with
specifically
i i don't think someone can make a
decision like that for a child
do you think we can make any medical
decisions for children
uh that concern their actual like saving
their lives and their medical health but
not in terms of their sexuality i don't
i don't think they wouldn't be in terms
of their life i don't believe well it
wouldn't be well it wouldn't be in terms
of their sexuality it would be in terms
of their mental health
right but it's it's in the name of their
mental health i get that but for
purposes of uh determining their
sexuality i just don't think it's not
determining sorry not determining their
sexuality but like uh
medically altering them in a way that
pertains to this to their sex you know
sexuality so to me i just mean your
gender yeah sure because it's also not
determining that either
well gender and sexuality are related
right
i
i don't think they're interchangeable or
synonymous
i mean maybe they're related but i don't
know how that can they're not synonymous
in the sentence so that's why i was
getting confused um but by the way like
hormones like hormone blockers or just
regular like hrt
um this isn't like trying to change your
gender um this is if the kid is already
expressing um some type of um usually
like gender dysphoria like hate for
their body
um they go to like a therapist and then
that therapist signs off so they go to
an endocrinologist that endocrinologist
saying children are expressing their
babies hatred for their body yeah yeah
like uh how old are these children um
sometimes they're seven sometimes
they're they're usually like teenage
range like uh 13 14. but um specifically
yeah i i don't if you're seven years
i'll give you an example of this
so when i was six years old
six five five to seven right
um
i uh
was crying a lot and i was crying
because i wanted to be 16 years old i'm
not making this up by that i wanted to
be like 18 and the reason was because i
was watching drake and josh in those
shows
and i was like i
i want to be like older i want to live
the life i'm sick of being a kid i don't
want to be a kid anymore i'm not it
sounds might sound funny i'm not even
lying about this and i would cry to my
mom and i'd be like i want to be 17 i'm
17.
and
i'm not saying that's that's like an
analogy to trans people
who as adults
uh express this
views about uh that they have gender
dysphoria but
i'm just saying like as a kid people
kids
express all range of emotions yes
it's not enough to like
so if these emotions are consisting of
like
uh
like a large
um
feeling of like hatred towards your body
engendered senses not in like oh i'm fat
oh i'm like this type of thing it's
usually in like oh um i am
like i'm a guy i look like a guy i'm
going to grow up to have huge muscles
i'm going to have like a lot of facial
hair and it makes me really disgusting
i've known people
i've known like people who grew up
and they would tell women who would tell
me for example that they grew up always
thinking of themselves like as a boy for
example right and they mean yeah yeah
i've kind of grown up the same way like
i'm a tomboy but i've never had a
feeling of like oh i really want to be a
guy um and i'm like close
because of this they would tell me that
they had no identification with their
like
that they were women whatsoever but when
they became when they became adults the
situation changed right and they decided
you know so i'm just saying like
when you can express something as a
child but then when you're an adult you
change your mind right and to me sure
that's why we that's why we give like um
children at like really young ages um
like to what like if it's if it's like
12 or like 14 or these young ages we
usually give them like hormone blockers
um because those are pretty reversible
i i don't know about if how are they
reversible i don't
um they kind of just like haul puberty
so imagine if you're like um your body
and how i i don't think like puberty or
sexual development or those kinds of
things are well known enough to be able
to come to the conclusion that you know
this is not going to be a life
ultimately they've been they've been
researched for like
over i don't know 25 they have not been
well researched actually this
this i mean
do you have any facts about this
i
all i can say is it's not well
researched like i don't know what you
mean
okay i mean so like you're saying it's
not well researched yeah i mean do you
have
um
do you have a study that says it's not
well researched no there's no no no no
what i'm saying is do you have like the
current research and you can like point
out how it's not real well researched
you don't have to like i don't have
enough but i know that i know that not
enough is known
about it that's fine so how um it's okay
if you just know it so what's
specifically not well researched about
it
okay the way the human body works
specifically how sexuality works how
puberty works and how sexual development
works is not well known
um
i mean in general it's not
any type of like endocrine clinics or
anything or
that's not relevant it's not known for
example why puberty happens at the time
it does
it's not it's not known
it's not known for example
what the factors that go into specific
uh developmental trajectories
for uh you know a given person and their
body and their development it's not even
known for example and this is what i
know too it's not even known like what
height you're gonna your puberty is
going to take you to actually it's not
yeah sure yeah these these are all
integrated right now it's not known uh
you know if you're gonna be able to grow
a beard it's not grown like you can you
can look at your parents and roughly
guess people say oh that means it's
genetic but they haven't found the genes
and actually haven't pinpoint the actual
mechanism by which it actually happened
so these yeah
okay so you can not know how it actually
happens but you can know that it does
happen so like i don't know i'm i'm
personally not like a mechanics person i
don't really know how a sink works but
like from me using a lot of empirical
evidence when i like turn the cold water
on the sink cold water comes out so i'm
guessing if i push the cold water the
cold water comes out unless the sink is
broken or whatever so like um like we
can we can study something even if we
don't know how it works i have a quote
yeah i have a quote that some random
person in my chat said little is known
about the long-term side effects of
hormonal puberty blockers in children
with gender dysphoria although the
gender identity development service
advises this is a physically reversible
treatment if stopped it is not known
what psychological effects may be it
also not known whether hormone blockers
affect the development of the teenage
brain or children's bones side effects
may also include hot flushes fatigue and
uh alterations and i'm gonna tell you
yeah sure so these are so yeah i've
never claimed that um
that there isn't like any types of side
effects for them i never
well
they're they're not what i spend this is
the national health pattern
what i said okay so what i said was that
they're reversible which i'm pretty sure
you said in that quote no it's not what
it said it said that the gender identity
development service and i'm not sure
their bias actually
uh advises this is a physically
reversible treatment they've stopped and
that's what they're saying going off of
their word i don't know how reliable
their word is okay well i don't know how
reliable your quote is but if you are
relying on it it comes from the national
health service of the united kingdom so
that sounds pretty
okay well look so i said that it was
reversible if we don't know any um if we
don't know i really don't believe it's
reversible i don't believe it's
reversible how do you why do you not
believe that is it just because i don't
buy it i don't i don't buy that for
example at such a crucial moment of a
child's development you can just take
hormone blockers and that's not going to
have implications for your long-term
development if you cut them off and
reverse them i know how such small
things influence such development
um i mean there's probably not been as
much testing as if the person like
um goes off of hormones or not if there
hasn't been enough testing then don't
push it off
can i
so what i was saying is i don't think
there's been a lot of testing um where
they
where someone has gone on pd blockers
and then gone off of puberty blockers
for a long period of time i don't think
there's been a lot of those things
because not a lot of people like
de-transition out of the amount of trans
people that already exist well so having
that amount of study would be having
that amount of research might be hard
because i think a lot of people
um stay on it and the people who do stay
on it seems like it's working pretty
well for them so i think we should
continue providing the medication
that's why we figured out if anything
goes wrong if anything does go wrong
maybe we can revoke it um but from what
i've seen so far it doesn't seem like
there's any type of like big negative
effects from it
yeah but you just said that not like
there hasn't been a good amount of
studies for that specific circumstance
which means you don't know enough to
know whether
uh
you can you should be able to push this
on kids it's like if they want to
reverse it you're not pushing it on kids
it's a permanent decision you're making
for that it's not a permanent decision
also like you're not pushing it on kids
so usually in these um appointments when
you're trying to get like puberty
blockers what happens is that
um the they usually have like a
therapist session refer them to an
endocrinologist so they have like um an
endocrinologist is like a hormone person
i don't know if you okay yeah look i
it look it's a it's a nice sounding name
but at the end of the day these people
don't know
um you know they're an endocrinologist
mental health no i i don't i really
don't
absolutely not you don't think people
who study in their fields might know a
bit about those fields no i don't i
don't think they know anything about
them
um
i
okay well how do you well here's why
because just because you're putting a
name on it and you're creating a
profession and paying people
okay no no you're not putting a name on
your profession you're training um for
around like eight yeah well you just
interrupted me so you didn't actually
hear what i was saying whatsoever so
okay if your human changes just because
you call it something and then there's a
profession centered around uh pretending
like you know things and finding
patterns and you know doing all this
kind of stuff doesn't actually mean you
know the object you're pretending to
know in actual reality right you're an
endocrinologist uh there were people who
were um phrenologists back in the back
in the day right where they were
measuring uh or looking at people's
skulls and seeing how that the
influences or determines their
personality so just like just because
you have a profession and people are all
they're working on and that's what they
do for a living doesn't mean they know
the fucking mysteries of childhood
development and childhood psychology and
childhood mental health and things that
people haven't even been able to master
for like thousands of years and we're
still not even really close to being
able to understand that
uh
do you think
yeah so like i would love to be shown
like proof that these people really have
unlocked the secrets of childhood mental
health so much so
so much so to the point where you can
make decisions for children uh impacting
their adult futures and long-term
futures so this is the case for every
single medical field no it's not because
wait no no no here's the difference
it's absolutely not because and other no
no in other in other medical schools
in other medical fields say for
psychiatry usually you're getting
medical treatments because you already
have life-threatening or
life
harming whatever diseases and
pathologies which you have no other
choice but to treat in a way that
medical professionals would be required
in that's why for example yes it's true
for every other medical profession but
we know that those things will help you
for example in saving your life or
preventing a long-term impairment of one
of your your functions in your body you
don't know with 100 certainty but it
more or less works now this is the
decision you're talking about in this
something besides like one sentence
go ahead um yeah sure so like
uh
what what i'm saying was the logic that
you could use um earlier where you're
saying that like we don't know
everything that could happen this is
used in every single medical field no i
just explained right
i just explained why we wouldn't be yeah
in other medical fields it's a risk
first reward
it's a basic risk versus reward
situation for all the other ones
okay yeah sure and it's the same for
transgender people no it's not these
people it is not
a lot of these people when they go to
therapists um they usually talk about
like suicidal ideation in terms of
gender dysphoria so a lot of these
things if children are talking about
that i i don't think if children are
talking about suicidal ideation that
any psychological in terms of like
chemicals they should not be uh be given
chemicals in response to that in any
capacity whether it's uh pills for uh
psychological psychiatric pills for
their mental health or uh i don't
believe in any of that for children
whatsoever you don't believe in helping
children through medication
um
look you worded that in such a weasly
fucking way or you don't believe in
helping children with medication yeah of
course i do do i believe children's
psychological problems should be
addressed with chemicals no i don't do
you think we should help children's yeah
sure i mean i was asking a question so
that i could clarify the position so
um are you saying that we should
not give children any medication to help
them with mental problems
no
uh so no you're not saying that or yes i
don't i know you are no i don't think
you should
um
okay i mean
so wait really you don't think we should
give children i don't think you should
give seven-year-olds who are too hyper
ritalin and all this other dumb shit i
don't think you should give children all
these fucking pills and chemicals which
are gonna fuck them up in the long term
fuck no i don't think you should i mean
i mean yes they're gonna fuck them up in
the morning but they are fucking them up
in the long term and we're seeing it in
real time you think i would let my kids
you think i would let a doctor give my
kid fucking pills they're gonna alter
how their brain fucking works fuck no i
was raised by my parents the way my
parents were raised by their parents and
so on and so on sans maybe thousands of
fucking years we didn't have any of
these fucking pills and we've been doing
fine i'm not going to raise my fucking
kids in that way and and as far as i
know about americans and the american
people are concerned they also have
traditions of raising children that
stretch back hundreds and hundreds of
years that weren't these chemical brain
altering things for their fucking kids
so yeah i don't i i'm completely against
that hundred thousand fucking percent
okay so you're just like
like this is just a hard line you draw
it on like
uh
like any type of
medication that would help a child with
their mental problems you don't want to
ever like no no chemicals whatsoever
um
and that's just like
that's just like a morality thing for
you that's that's nothing else like you
would apply that to every other
situation
what what are you talking about
um
can't think for a second
can you mute can i think
okay
let's say if you had a child
um
that was
like
really um like they had some type of
like
mental disorder
um and this might cause them to like
commit suicide what what
mental disorder are you referring to
this is just a hypothetical i i don't
believe that's how the brain works
though i don't think you just have
mental disorders that randomly cause you
to commit
you know random acts i'm coming from the
perspective of psychoanalysis so it's
you're going to have to okay
i'm trying
you're going to be hard-pressed to give
to convince me that highly subjectivized
and highly experiential things like so
the reason i'm giving you a hypothetical
here is so that i can um try to
understand where your moral values
in relation to behavior works
there's no medical disorder that
randomly has people commit suicide it
doesn't exist in reality medical okay
well it's not how the brain works so
it's it's a hypothetical premise on the
false assumption of how brains work
okay but
okay let's say listen i know you're
trying to copy all of your speech
patterns and mannerisms from fucking
destiny but why don't you actually
listen to what i just fucking told you
you are making the false assumption that
the thing the reason why people have
suicidal ideation all this kind of stuff
is directly caused by chemically
identifiable um disorders in the brain i
don't buy that paradigm of fucking
mental health or psychiatry whatsoever
so the hypothetical is premised by an
entirely entirely according to me false
view of psychology in the first place
um yeah i don't i don't buy that either
however that's not what i was assuming
when i'm trying to give you what i'm
trying to give you is the situation in
which you could you could say for
example they may have you could try and
say for example and they need help you
can try and say for example someone can
be born with a severe case of autism
according to which they engage in highly
destructive and self-destructive
activity for example they're hitting
themselves a lot and they're doing all
this kind of things that yeah like
self-injurious behavior yeah yeah
there's forms of extreme autism uh which
fallen yeah yeah i i actually studied
this so yeah i know
yeah
so okay yeah yeah so okay in those cases
if there's some type of like pill you
can give them that might alter their
like chemistry
um but it like works 100 of the time um
would you be okay yeah sure a sedative
or something like that sure otherwise
the alternative is is they're going to
die right okay i i mean
but you have to understand you have to
understand that when you're talking
about injured you don't know if they're
gonna die like they're just like hitting
their head against a wall like i mean
well there's a height there's a high
risk that they're going to yeah they're
constantly engaging in self injurious
behavior yeah yeah
just like if a person's um constantly
engaging in suicidal thoughts where they
yeah but here's the difference
yeah the difference in the case of
suicidal ideation is that that's a
highly subjectivized phenomena which is
mediated
which is mediated actually by
consciousness it's something mediated by
consciousness in a case of severe autism
and people engaging in this repetitive
extremely uh dangerous self-destructive
behavior that's not a highly subjective
uh behavior mediated by the intro some
labyrinth of consciousness it's almost a
kind of spontaneous pathological
activity that they have four reasons
that we can at least know cannot be
addressed in the form of uh external
environmental um
uh intervention like and for example in
the way in which you talk to them and
and deal with them like they as far as
we don't even know per se but for now
there's no way we can deal with that
whatsoever
in any other way besides giving them
some kind of sedative or giving them
some kind of pill which will calm them
down and prevent them from engaging in
this uh behavior which is destructive to
them and others but that behavior can't
be like psychoanalyzed right
that behavior is just something they're
doing almost like
uh autonomy like an almost kind of like
autonomously right without any
subjective or conscious clear subjective
or conscious mediation whatsoever like
for example they're not doing this
they're like they're not like um oh yeah
i'm hitting myself and i'm hitting
people because i'm sad or because my
feelings were hurt or because i'm upset
they are just doing it and you don't
know why they're doing it right so
and you can't communicate them with in
any way to figure out why they're doing
it so in that case yeah there's no issue
but that doesn't comprise what i would
that doesn't fall under the rubric of
what i would call children's
psychological um
children's psychology because that's
more a case of physio physiology in that
case if it's something that's not uh uh
subjective or consciously mediated then
it's physiological at that point right
but in the case of children's psychology
and their mental issues and their highly
subjective consciousness whatever yeah
you don't respond to that with pills
that's something i fundamentally believe
okay so i'm trying to um so it seems
like you would respond to it by pills
though if it was like a one hundred
percent guaranteed no
it has nothing to do with it
even if it was a sixty percent guarantee
the fact that i said one zero
if it was a one hundred percent it's
irrelevant one hundred is irrelevant
even maybe in some extreme cases fifteen
percent might suffice because they're
engaging in a physiologically based not
psychological physiological based highly
self-destructive form of behavior to
themselves and others it's not about the
percentage of how much times the pill
would work it is about the nature of the
phenomena which needs to be addressed in
the first place which is not
psychological in a sense that i'm
referring to
so first of all if you're using a um
if the reason they're hitting themselves
or doing some type of self-injurious
behavior or having thoughts of suicide
if these are um no these are
like chemicals
if they can be fixed you just weaseled
something in that's implemented
if they're having thoughts of suicide if
they are spontaneously and in almost
involuntarily harming themselves or
others which is something that happens
in severe cases of autism and maybe
something like down syndrome or things
like that okay but we're not talking
about suicidal ideation ideation okay
okay we can we can scratch that and come
back to it later so um
so sure if someone's having like
self-injurious behavior um and
if the
problems are with like the chemicals in
their brain or whatever um and then you
give them a pill to regulate their their
brain chemicals um and it works 90 of
the time and ten percent of the time it
it might make their like bones slightly
bigger um but it would like
dramatically help with their like uh
life do you think that we should give
them this pill or are you kind of
against it well let me address the way
you just phrase that in two ways right
the first one is you said their brain
chemicals that's not
in the case of uh these cases that we're
talking about are not down to some like
uh arbitrary measurement of brain
cancers we're talking about a
physiological difference there's a
physiological difference for example
people who have down syndrome have
different number of chromosomes so it's
not just a matter of uh brain chemical
difference they have a very clear severe
physiological difference sure it's not
brain it requires them to be addressed
in a different way so and then and then
second of all second of all okay second
of all
the percent is irrelevant if they are
engaging in behavior in which they
cannot be controlled they cannot control
themselves where they're constantly
hitting themselves and others need to be
sedated
the risk and reward factor has obviously
tilted to the point because this is
something again
not being mediated by consciousness
something that's not highly subjective
but strictly
the risk reward factor has shift just
like if you got cancer or if you got
some kind of disease right but even if
you found a study in which you found
that 80 percent for example of
transgender people will grow up if they
don't do this to engage in self and
jerry's behavior you can't treat it as
the same thing because it's not an
involuntarily involuntarily spontaneous
physiological thing it's something
highly subjectivized and mediated
psychologically and mediated consciously
so
do you think that um subjective things
in which you like uh mediate consciously
do you think that these things can be
operationalized or no absolute this is
the number one prejudice of american
psychiatry and my answer is a resounding
no it can't
wait why not like it seems like because
these things are not reducible to their
physiological substrates and if you
target their physiological substrates in
order to affect the output you are
probably just harming and butchering uh
this person's uh uh health their
physical health do you know that like
it's
because it's not physiologically
reducible
a subject is not physiologically
reducible well yeah i
yeah i
yeah i know um yeah so it's like you
can't operationally control as someone's
subjective conscious experience with
chemicals well no
you're not sorry the word operationalize
is to mean like um to
uh
measure something subjective in an
objective way so instead of like um so
like something subjective is like
walking across the street um so like
what does that mean like we have to
operationalize to figure out uh how do
you like walk across the street so um if
you like walk across the street halfway
but then kind of like go off the like
crosswalks a bit and then go back on it
and then finish is that walking across
the street like we have these different
types of measurements and we group them
in so that we can um do like statistical
analysis
yeah
i don't think you can do so under the
paradigm of modern psychiatry and under
the paradigm of modern natural science i
don't
um
and the reason because
unlike in natural science you are
dealing with an object which is not just
an object okay in natural science you're
just dealing with object in this case
the
uh the observer themselves
shares the same uh subjective uh
uh
position of annunciation so to speak as
the so-called object well isn't that
kind of like um
doesn't this like a scientist falsely
objectivizes the other while not taking
into account they are just doing so
they're making a subjective intervention
upon another subject in the disguise
that it's merely objective don't you
think that your reasoning here um kind
of loops back into itself like um you're
saying
it it sounds like this is what you're
saying i'm not saying you are i'm trying
to get more further clarification um
it sounds like what you're saying is
that
in soft sciences
or like social sciences what they're
doing is they're taking subjective
material and um they're operationalizing
it into objective material to study it
and this is bad because it's not
objective material so what so what's
like important about objective material
am i missing something because they're
not the same thing
i mean
why does that matter towards whether
because it's not actually objective
that's why
i mean
yeah but if something highly correlates
to like one factor you can maybe you
haven't actually isolated the cause but
if you're treating it as objectively
very dangerous
you're treating the cause as an
objective even though it's not even
practically speaking you're intervening
in such a way so as to treat the cause
as something objective
by targeting the physiological
substrates when in fact it's not
objective so it's a very dangerous thing
you're doing
wait okay even
even if you're measuring things that
objective you cannot say there is an
objective cause you can never do that in
science okay but unless you're so far
an objective intervention in someone's
physiology that is what you're doing
uh
can you say that in different words
in so far as the conclusion of such a
study is going to allow you to uh
intervene in people's physiological uh
constitution with chemicals and pills
and all this kind of shit you are
fucking doing that
um
you're doing mine
you are treating it as objective
oh
and you're treating the cause as
objective because you're
well no you're not treating yes you are
you fundamentally are treating the
causes objection so if you would
so like usually in like scientific
studies
um they always i don't think they ever
say like this is the reason this happens
this is the cause 100 percent but it is
practically operationally implied in the
method of treatment what is what does
operationally implied mean it means in
the measure of the way in which the
treatment works implies that that is the
cause
um
i
but but they don't they don't yes it
does the way the treatment
works implies that it's the cause
what what study does this that they
imply it's the cause every single one
that's relevant to what you're talking
about no they usually say they have a
sort of like correlation and that they
should further continue into their
studies to figure out if the correlation
um they can repeat this
gina whatever your name is xena it's
like xena what are your friends i'm sure
you are not listening to what i'm saying
if this study is going to lead you to
the conclusion that the solution is
we're going to prescribe these pills
you are basically saying what the cause
is
um
well this well they're saying the
solution is to do this because it seems
like it's working and we should keep
going yeah but you don't know what the
cause is in the first place yeah sure
you never it just seems like these
weren't experienced but if it
it just like it's working but you don't
know what the cause is in actual reality
so what actually are you doing you don't
know this is why they say you're
tampering with something you don't know
it just apparently works
but what are the side effects what are
the long-term implications what are the
long-term results right you don't know
these things
because you don't know the cause but you
make it seem like you know the cause
when you prescribe the pills in this way
you're implying you know
have you ever looked at a medication
bottle i'm pretty sure on them they say
like oh by the way we don't know if this
will help this particular side effect
yeah but guess what
yeah but guess what like physical
medication as well yeah but like i said
in all modern science it's a matter um
okay first of all first of all
listen we are talking about the
so-called social science not the hard
science which is scientists do these as
well hard sciences do these as well all
science does this but it's not the same
because in that case you are operating
under a paradigm of how human physiology
works
how you understand how the psychological
sphere works is entirely different
i mean
uh that's because it's not
unlike in the case of like
unlike in the case of the hard
physiological medical sciences where
there are attributable causes and
effects or at least apparent causes and
effects
can you show me um a study that is of
the hard sciences and like biology or
chemistry that um that say like this
causes this can you like one obviously
those exist they don't do that yeah they
do
obviously they'll say this causes this
reaction this causes uh this uh result
obviously they do that
i'm pretty sure obviously they say this
causes this adverse reaction most of the
time or for this person
most of the time yeah sure they might
say like this has a correlative factor
no they don't say they say it causes
no they don't the first thing you learn
in every single science um like
department is correlation doesn't equal
causation yeah but that doesn't mean
that these hard sciences don't deal with
causation they do they demonstrably do
but they don't
yes they do just because they reject the
view that correlation is causation
doesn't mean they don't seek to discover
the actual causes of things yeah yeah
yeah sure in their studies
yeah exactly they do seek causation but
that doesn't mean they say what you're
talking about is absolute you're talking
about epistemology whether it's
absolutely known if this is the cause
and obviously they don't claim that but
they still are saying it's the cause
they still do
they still do make pretense to the
objective cause
and it
so i'm pretty sure you're saying that
like the main point is that it we don't
know everything it could have this side
effect it could have this side effect
yeah and what they'll say is that the
risk reward is this they talk about
listen it's risk and reward
sure the risk-reward right but the
reason it's risk and reward is is listen
the reason it's risk and reward is
because you can't deal with it just by
thinking as far as we know maybe we'll
get to a point where we can master some
kind of ancient wisdom or spirituality
where we can do that but for now if you
have for example uh if you have a
bacterial infection inside of you you
take a z-pack or something and you don't
know all you don't even know what you're
doing your body really you really don't
know but if you want to stop that
infection from getting way worse and
killing you you just take the pill and
that's what happens but when it comes to
something that's psychologically and
high mediated consciously mediated
highly subjective
when you're treating the cause of that
in the same way you're doing something
very dangerous
you're doing that the same way because
you are you are you are you are
withdrawing
you are withdrawing from and abandoning
your basic human subjectivity and
objectivizing you at your most
fundamental level
any type of non-uh over-the-counter
medication is going to be more risky
that's why they don't put it over the
counter and you have to go through like
okay
it has nothing to do with whether it's
risky when i say you're doing a very
dangerous thing i'm saying you're doing
you're engaging in a fundamental act
of denying your own subjectivity more or
less
dangerous
how's it dangerous because you're doing
because you're doing things to yourself
you're doing things to yourself which
are not only known in terms of their
effect and so on and so on but
there is no clear
relationship between the so-called
psychological result the subjective
result and what you're doing with
yourself
there's usually pretty high causation
well yeah that's that's that's why they
conclude that like we should try to
continue doing this thing it's because
it has um a correlation yeah but you
don't know what's happening in that case
you don't actually know what's happening
it apparently works
right
but you don't actually know what's
happening i guess but like i mean you
don't know what's happening in every
single scenario we could say that yeah
yeah but here's the difference since
it's something consciously and
subjectively mediated right you're not
dealing with it on the terms of its
actual existence and expression in the
form of uh subjectively and
psychologically and so on you're not
dealing with the phenomena in the cradle
of its actual essence you're dealing
with it like it's an objective natural
scientific uh
phenomena that's reducible to that
rather than for example addressing it at
the surface level
um
so in this case the correct thing would
to do for example
would be to focus on the symptom and not
look for a physical cause just focus on
the symptom
um
yeah so it seems that's what for example
psychoanalysis
psychoanalysis focuses on the symptom it
doesn't look for the actual physical
cause
are you done
go ahead
oh okay i didn't you just didn't let me
before um yeah so i think we were
talking about um
like what's the
what's the difference between
uh the subjective consonant like
the subjective um or not measuring
subjectivity uh you
record the subjectivity and then you
measure
um it through you record the recording
of the subjectivity and then measure the
recording of the recording of the
measurement because it's an infinite
recursion you know that right
right
it's this is the basic kind of german
idealist kantian paradox what you're
talking about is an infinite recursion
you can't draw a real line between
objective and subjective when the object
is subjected
okay okay please don't go down this like
um what's it called
going down this road you have come to a
place in which this is a place of
enlightenment not the place of anglo box
this is a place where we do talk about
kant yeah
right i mean you can mute i mean you can
mute me if you really don't want to hear
what i'm trying if i don't want you to
go ffff do that shit again i'll meet you
okay
um so if we're talking about it's not
trying to sound like destiny
okay
i know you say okay just like he does
too
okay so if we're talking about
subjectivity okay
so if we're talking about subjectivity
um versus objectivity
and we're trying to show the difference
between these and then you bring up an
argument in which you say
uh oh well
you see the
um
it's an infinite recursion what is
subjective what is objective it seems
like we kind of like break the whole
system and we were arguing uh under
a uh like a premise already like
of
like how we were understanding these
concepts it kind of seemed like you
broke the concepts and we have to go
back and fix them so that's why i was
not wanting to go down that path because
it seems like what happens is like uh we
were already working with like a pretty
well understood like difference between
what is subjective what is objective and
then you kind of just like broke that um
it's okay if you want to go down that
road let's go down i don't know what the
fuck you're talking about so let's go
down
okay sure so um i'm guessing i would say
subjective is usually something that you
can't like um
like physically measure that you really
have to
okay well what would you say subject you
can't really physically measure uh dark
matter or most things in quantum
mechanics modern physics are not
physically measured they're just based
on mathematics so i would not agree with
that definition of subjective
i mean can't you like
uh
okay so what's your definition of
subjective sentence
yeah subjective concerns the very
position of the annunciation of the
subject the embodied subject and the
conscious being
who is uh
intervening in the natural world the
natural so-called object of natural
science uh in such a way so as to
measure it so as to quantify it and and
so on and so on and the reason we draw
this cartesian distinction after
modernity is because we draw a fine line
between us our consciousness i who i am
my identity uh my selfhood and all this
kind of stuff we draw a distinction
between this the observer the subject
the conscious being and the world
outside of us which is apparently
outside of our
consciousness and outside of our
subjectivity and which is therefore
treated according to modern science as a
kind of dead
dead thing something that's not
a person not a subject not something
with thoughts not something which
reflexes
reflects upon itself and has the quality
of self reflexivity okay so for example
a stone does not reflect upon what is a
stone who is a stone what does the stone
do it's just a stone right that's all it
is so an object is a strict cause of the
subject
um
okay i'm gonna try to summarize this
because um
i said a lot of words
i'm just trying to you're not educated
that's the issue
okay yeah so i'm trying to get you to
educate me so that's why i'm restating
the sentence in my own words so i can
understand it so we can continue with
the conversation
can i do that go ahead
okay sure so um i'm guessing you're
saying that like subjective is something
that you can't uh observe with your
consciousness no objectives no
okay
so
um can you
say it in a way you would think i would
understand
yes i'll say it one more time
okay it has nothing to do with uh it's
not about whether you can observe it or
not it's about whether you can
externalize it and objectify it in the
first place and embody it as a thing
that is outside of you or outside of the
sphere of discursive intercommunicative
rationality if you want to go down
harmons whatever you want to call it it
is something you can externalize into a
thing
it's something you what do you mean by
externalize
something outside of the realm of
consciousness language subjectivity and
so on and so on and agents and so on and
so on so it's outside the realm of
thought consciousness subjectivity
um
wait
okay
if it's outside the thought
um like you can't
think about it that's subjective
if it is something that is not for
itself it's only for you
does it make sense better
it's only in itself like a rock it's not
for you it's not for itself you are the
subject for whom
it appears or it appears to be relevant
or significant or whatever like you know
the word subject and grammar right it's
pretty much the same thing we're talking
about a rock
would be the object you would be the
subject because their rock imposes its
significance its relevance for your
sphere of experience for you
in itself you don't have any business
with that rock
but you are the thing you are what the
rock is for as far as your world of
meaning is concerned
the rock exists for you
it when it
what it is in and of itself is not
relevant to you um
and that's not relevant to me because i
can't know if the rock exists
it's not relevant to you because insofar
as you make it relevant you become the
subject of the manner by which you
interact with it or think about it or
deal with it
uh with the rock
yeah insofar as you make this round and
a rock an object of your concern you are
the subject of the rock
um
so what do you mean by concern
if you think about it interact with it
or make it concern yourself with it in
any capacity
so if i think about the rock that means
the rock is subjective
you are the subject the manner by which
you are you are you are engaging in a
subjective
process you are thinking about a rock a
rock doesn't think about itself because
it's an object
iraq doesn't think about you as far as
you're concerned at least because
there's no language that mediates any
relationship between you and the right
okay i understand it just clicked okay
cool so um
okay so how can we translate these
concepts to what we were talking about
earlier
well you're the one who wanted to
clarify the difference between
subjective and objective well yeah
that's because it seems like okay let's
let's uh translate it then
if you are taking a given psychological
phenomena a given psychological
subjectively linguistically
consciously mediated phenomena
in reality
and treating it like an object
isolating it as an object for example
at that moment
oh are you just against like western
forms of medicine
um
where where
i'm advocating right now ultimately my
position is not relevant but for let's
say devil's advocate i'm just advocating
for a normal modernist position on the
question of modern science
you are
beyond the shadow realm of uh
the you are beyond the threshold of what
i would consider sanity with the way
you're describing it i consider uh the
modern sciences progression into trying
to treat the subjective phenomena
as a
objective natural scientific phenomena
to be a form of civilizational madness
right but
insofar as we're going before this
neoliberal period or whatever yeah the
basic modern position is that there's a
difference between a subject and an
object subjects are rationally
discursively
mediated beings through language and
through thought and so on and so on and
the objective natural world is something
outside of us the minute you start to
treat human being as an object outside
of us
in this kind of way you engage in a type
of barbarism that's the modern western
position
um of which we have departed from
significantly i don't really care if
it's the modern western position um
but
like
okay
so
um
what is
what does this have to do with the um
like
what does this have to do with the
overall point it seems like what we were
talking about before was um you had a
problem you are trying to address a
psychological mental
uh whatever subjective phenomena
in an objective way
um
how else would you treat that
of course
subjectively but how do you measure
something subjectively you don't you
don't measure it that's the thing you
don't measure
how can you measure an individual
experience you can't
yeah you if you like objectively measure
it that's fine but like okay so can't
measure someone's actual subjectivity
how do you make any studies off of
subjective experiences then
that's why i think uh modern psychology
is all bullshit throw it in the garbage
oh okay i gotta throw it in the dumpster
all of it burn it all like they burned
like the mongols sat the library of
baghdad like uh julius caesar
accidentally destroyed the library of
alexandria burn burn burn destroy all of
it fahrenheit 451 yeah okay of course um
got it
um
yeah okay and um so you're saying that
the
like you just can't
uh give a
objective reason for a
um subjective experience
no
and what's the reason at least if we're
in the realm of modern science no
yes well
i mean
you you can do it if we operate from the
basic cartesian distinction which is the
founding of modern natural science and
the medical field and everything no you
can't
[Music]
um
what do you mean no you i mean i can't
can you measure love measure love for me
um you can
okay sure you can um go ahead and give
people a survey and then you can say hey
have you felt in love before and then
they could mark yes or no and you mark
those numbers down as one and two and
then you can start uh pushing putting
this on
so your inputs and your outputs are
basically what are they going to output
on the survey so for example the way you
would interact with that operationally
would be you know you would produce a
different all this time they said no
they didn't love their mother right
you're not actually addressing the core
of their experience though in any kind
of way you know how you address the core
of their experience you'd say let's talk
about your mother that's what freud said
he said sit down let's talk about your
mother let's walk through your
experience as a child let's actually
explore that let's not treat it as a
static objectified output
because we're lazy and we don't actually
care about people's inner experience we
just care about the extent to which they
comprise
phenomenal impressions on our horizon of
experience you're basically saying oh
get this phenomena you're just treating
the phenomena's output not actually
addressing its actual essence or its
actual uh real cost well measuring the
output is how we figure out no it's not
because listen this is why americans are
fucked up in the head you are you you're
now you are intervening and manipulating
all over the outskirts
or anything you are all you people of
the medical establishment you are
manipulating everyone's output because
you're sick of people complaining and
whining and you're doing it to such a
point that you give them all these pills
and they become zombies all the output's
fine but inside deep inside in their
subjective experience they are screaming
and then when they go and commit suicide
you go huh well we gave them all the
pills and we did all this
i wonder why they went and committed
suicide because you didn't even fucking
interact with them in a human way you
treated them as a fucking object and you
just gave a bunch of fucking pills to
solve their fucking problems because you
were sick of the phenomenal output
without concerning yourself in any
critical capacity whatsoever for the
real cause
so
i'm not a psychiatrist by the way yeah
but through the medical establishment
and your consensus has led to the
so-called crisis of mental health we are
now experiencing in america i mean i
blame you
okay
okay
so
um
yeah so the
i think what you have a problem is is
people measuring
things
um in an objective way but measuring
subjective things yeah in an objective
way yeah yeah um yeah that's what i
meant sorry
so
um how do you measure things in a
subjective way and if you can't which
you just don't measure it measurement
implies quantification sure so do you
human interaction how do you know
treatment how do you know the treatment
for i'll explain to you how you know
how do you know if a treatment for a
subjective um problem is helping you
cannot treat a subjective problem from
the perspective of medical natural
science you can't
i would say go seek religion go seek
psychoanalysis go seek spirituality
that's how i would respond to it and let
me tell you why the d here's where the
line begins and ends wait when you are
talking about how to subjectively help
someone you're implying two things
you're dealing with two things
let's say there's someone who's fucking
miserable with life and i want to treat
them right
there's two things that are being
implied here one i'm assuming a state of
subjective happiness a baseline norm and
i'm saying you know what this person's
miserable but they could be happy
because i know happiness i've
experienced happiness why don't i try to
interact with them in a way so they
could see what i'm able to see right
that's how that's one so you are
assuming a premise that happiness is
possible as a human being that's an
extremely subjective spiritual whatever
you want to call uh assumption because
what if the from a philosophical
perspective what if the miserable person
is right and they're actually true what
if they're correct what if there is no
meaning to the world that if we are
honest with ourselves about what our
place in the universe and in the cosmos
is we should be fucking miserable there
are philosophers who have written that
the only honest thing humanity can do is
collectively commit suicide right this
is a this is up for contention that must
be dealt with spiritual and
philosophically it's not a given you
can't just assume that people should be
happy or people should be okay so that's
one of the ways it's subjectively loaded
the second thing you're going to be
assuming
is that you can communicate with them in
such a way that as a human being as a
subject you are basically the same as
them that you like them are human and
that even though you don't know them
you are you are
living in the same world as them living
in the same universe as them and sharing
the same subjective discursive uh
rational whatever you want space as them
not you're not some scientist in other
words who's above them who's going to
solve their problems and cure them
magically you are no different than them
you're just another fucking guy right
you're going to communicate them get on
their level and they're going to come to
an understanding that you are just like
them and vice versa and so on so you're
going to work with them in a way that is
mutually imperiling both your
subjectivities you're not going to be a
scientist sitting in his ivory tower
who's just assuming that his
subjectivity is safeguarded and
unaltered and he's just going to treat
this person like an experiment you as
the person intervening in this person's
life you're going to put your skin in
the game you're going to put your own
heart on the line too right that's what
it means to help a friend in need when
you have a friend in need who's suicidal
and depressed you don't go up to them
like you're an impartial scientist who
doesn't you know who's outside you're
gonna say look dude i get it i
understand i'm miserable too you know
like and then you give them words of
encouragement you do things like that
you be a human being who's able to get
on their human level those are the two
things you have to be assuming when
you're talking about subjectively
treating someone things like
quantification things like measurement
that kind of shit doesn't fucking figure
into it
wait okay
so
how do we figure out if like um these
types of like subjective ways of
of treating subjective measurements how
do we figure out
what the fuck did you just say
subjective ways of treating subjective
measurements what the hell yeah if you
have like if you have like a therapy
there are no measurements there are no
measurements so objective or objective
whatever that means objective there's no
mess of it can i speak so if you have a
um
if you have a
person who's going through a really
tough time
um
and
you know you're trying to be there for a
friend
um like and then it's like oh cool
um you know maybe this helps them would
it not help this person how do we know
um you don't think maybe we should
that's the contingency of a subjectivity
yeah we don't know so so is there
because i think there's a way that we
can no no if we combine these
experiences so let's say like this
person had this experience this person
had this experience this person had this
absolutely not we're all kind of human
there is no
mutual subjective interaction in that
case whatsoever
you don't think we can ever make you are
trying to
you are trying to foreclose a mutually
subjective experience and substitute it
with taking the sum total of subjective
experiences and producing an objective
result and you can't do that
um
i mean you can
no you can't by definition you can't
i'm pretty sure wait can you repeat it
hello so
can i repeat it no i'm not gonna fucking
repeat it i'm sick of you asking me to
repeat shit that i've been trying so
hard
so fucking hard for you to understand
something so fucking simple you're
treating it as objective but it is
actually not objective
wait um you're not okay you're not true
you can treat it like it's objective but
in reality it's not if you agree
where is the objectivity then in that
okay you're not treating the um
subjectivity with like an objective
statement um if you're going through
like a therapeutic approach um you would
be measuring it in objective standards
which isn't um that isn't you
interacting
um with the human at that point like you
would be uh you would be doing this as a
listen from the perspective of modern
science modern science not the monster
that is outgrown that lives now modern
science is in cartesian modern science
so-called psychological health begins
and ends when you say as a human being i
am no different than you i don't know
something objectively that you don't
know but i have found a way to
understand the wisdoms and the trials
and tribulations of reality let's say
i'm your father i'm your grandfather
that can help you or i'm someone in your
life whatever
but
ultimately i don't have knowledge in the
sense of modern science which is going
to solve your problem we're all here
we're all here i don't know something
you don't fucking know right we're all
here sharing the same uh we are all here
no you don't not in the sense of
objection
right
we are all here experiencing reality in
real time i don't know something in
terms of someone's spiritual
psychological conscious predicament that
they don't know in the sense of the
knowledge relevant to modern science i'm
here just like you're here i'm dealing
with the fundamental torsion the
fundamental cut at the heart of being
that gives rise to self-reflexivity and
subjectivity the fundamental melodrama
of human being of human ontology i am
also at the mercy of that just like you
are we have in a sense the same problem
okay i don't have a solution to the
problem uh you don't have because i have
the same problem and
the only thing we can do is i have
learned to come to peace with this
problem in a specific way right but i
don't i don't i haven't found a way to
abstract myself from this problem that
is subject object division
um
okay
um
i have a question for you
yeah
um
would you say you're a confident person
okay
would you yeah
yeah yeah i would do um so like
if you are trying to explain like let's
say someone like a close friend comes to
you um and they say hey
um
well i'm not feeling very confident i'm
i need a solution
would you say well this is a subjective
experience i don't i could never know
what you're facing what um and i could
uh no you know this is this is something
that you literally listen to like any
type of other situations or anything or
are you generally i want to ask the
question one question no the knowledge
you know yeah yeah i'm so smart by the
way you're so smart open question
are you and maybe i'm not i'm not doing
this to make fun of you i mean i don't
make assumptions
do you have like a physiological uh
impairment that doesn't allow you to
like um
communicate with people or like
understand what people say you have like
a language disability problem anything
like that i should be aware of before i
uh
let's talk about this because i'm pretty
sure i remember saying pretty clearly
that language is what mediates
uh the common
mutually subjective experience between
subjects so no you don't say oh i could
never know you get on their fucking
levels oh what's going on why don't you
have confidence how do i give my own
fucking check that's the worst example
you're gonna give you go by example and
if there's still a barrier a fundamental
barrier that you can't like the reason
why you have objective natural science
is because there's a barrier i can talk
to a rock all i fucking want there's
some kind of barrier that can't be
bridged right
now if you're a humanist whatever
barrier is going on between you and
another human being you're going to try
the hardest you can if you're a friend
to cross that barrier if you fail you
bring your friend to someone else and
you keep trying and you bring them to a
holy person you bring them to a chef you
bring them to a priest you bring them to
somebody and uh someone said who's
smarter than you
but ultimately the truth is you have the
same problem that they do
um and this most of the time most of the
time how it works
is if there's if you have a depressed
friend most of the time is that the
person can't help their friend
because if they were honest with
themselves they're no better they would
also be depressed too it's just they're
too stupid to realize it right if you
come from a perspective for example of
uh psychoanalysis or psychology
something like this
then it's going to be different because
you have acquired an interest in these
things because you are yourself trying
to cope and deal with this pathologies
or it can even be religion right if
you're a very spiritual person you say
oh i understood where you were that's
why i adopted religion that's how jesus
saved my fucking life and prevented me
from fucking i'm not me personally but
i've talked to so many fucking people
who come in from the place jesus saved
my fucking life it wasn't for jesus i
would have fucking killed myself so many
people have told me that right so yeah
everybody has
the same problem basically not the same
form of this problem but nobody's above
somebody else where they're gonna act
like there's some kind of a lab quote
scientist who know who has some kind of
yeah you know objectively anybody else
but some people are more like
experienced just like you said right and
what these scientists you are talking
about are spiritual pygmies they're not
experiencing anything if i wouldn't fuck
their wife they would cry and break down
entirely
don't tell me these scientists are
experienced people they are experienced
in nothing nothing that concerns the
fundamental wisdom of human experience
now their experience when going to
school and being eggheads and writing
shit on their clipboard and whatever the
fuck they're doing but they are not
experienced in the sense of fundamental
human experience don't give me that
bullshit my fucking grandma more
experience than scientist
okay so do you think your grandma is
more experienced on something that maybe
she hasn't read a lot about um versus
like a person who's read a lot about a
subject talked to a lot of people on the
subject has like um done a lot of this
okay listen destiny clone destiny clone
number five thousand four hundred and
forty four yeah but you don't which you
seem to not fucking understand right and
your destiny voice is so fucking
annoying by the way
what we are talking about you're not
just talking about reading something
you're again that something is something
fundamentally subjective so don't get it
twisted and try to weasel your way into
making this a knock and say oh do you
think that maybe a nuclear scientist
knows more about your grandma than how
to on how to operate a nuclear reactor
yeah obviously but we're not talking
about the same fucking things here are
we
just stay on topic about how to best
help trans people um let's say like
trans people are really struggling um
with like their identity they're saying
hey listen you know what here's what i
believe if you're an adult if you're an
adult you do whatever the fuck you want
do whatever you want do whatever you see
fit i'm not going to bother you
but i'm against you pushing this on
children
um i wouldn't want to push it on
children i'm against you putting
hormones on children manipulating with
children's sexuality uh giving them
hormone ball blockers and puberty
blockers that are going to permanently
alter them for life you know there could
be a guy what if there's a little boy
he was destined to grow up with a really
big beard really strong muscles super
tall really big manly man you give him
these blockers then he regrets it and
then for the rest of his life he's going
to be more feminine right and he just
took something away that he'll never get
back testosterone i don't know like
no you took away for something from him
he will never get back
that's what he wanted right he was too
stupid to know what he wanted because he
was a fucking seven-year-old child
he was a seven-year-old child he was too
stupid to know what he wanted that's why
you go to that's why you go to a
therapist
therapist
fucking know even doctors don't know
shit i went to the fucking doctor once
uh about a fucking something stuck up my
fucking noses and all there's nothing in
her nose nothing your nose i blew it out
there was something in my fucking nose
even doc you acting like these people
know everything in the fucking world and
they don't this this is a personal
example and that's not like there's
plenty of examples of plenty of people
you know
even fucking doctors don't know at all
has unlocked the secrets of the human
mind
even fucking doctors don't even know how
our body works but we still do it anyway
because we have to but when it comes to
our mental subjective space you
understand modern science rests upon the
assumption that my body is different
from my head my consciousness my soul
i'm gonna my body breaks so i go to the
doctor fix my body when you're targeting
the inner experience of consciousness
and subjectivity with pills and shit you
are violating someone's humanity at its
most visceral level when they're a
fucking child
um
okay and gender identity is one of those
things that are inner
inner visceral experience you are
altering with something of a child they
don't know anything that's a child a
child doesn't know anything and you're
gonna fucking make a decision a
life-altering decision that's gonna
impact them for the rest of their life
hell no
um
i don't i haven't seen any uh
information that shows you
a robot you're a robot
uh well
you're coping pretending to listen
you've trained yourself to talk like
destiny and talk like a robot because
this is how you cope with the this is
how you cope with life to be a robot
this impartial robotic type of person i
see right past you xena i see right past
your robotic facade i see right past the
robotic facade
you're an emotional person you're gonna
break down and cry in time in your life
you're not you're not you're not some
robotic uh destiny type of person you're
sorry you're not
you do that because it makes you feel
powerful it makes you feel elevated
makes you feel above the world you're
not above the lord you're below the
world
uh okay wait are you saying i'm below
by you saying i'm below the world
doesn't that make you feel like you're
above the world and that's what you're
trying to do with you except it's true
except it's true okay yeah
uh okay so how much destiny have you
watched
um i watched him back in uh 2018 but i
don't know how that has to do with any
of those you learn all his ways of
talking
um okay well it sounds like you've
watched a lot of hassan
i didn't watch a lot i didn't watch that
much on what about john circus because
that's the guy i'm most familiar with
john circle but even then i don't copy
him well
i'm 100 what
john cena
really am i yeah 100 100
yeah
yeah i'm not that's a cope
that's a pope
you you even try to laugh like destiny
what is wrong with you like a skin
crawler you're like you're walking
around in destiny's skin you're like be
it's like you want to be destiny himself
um
i mean not really i share that creepy
you're literally creepy
you know he's his own person right
you're an over excited fan you're an
overly enthusiastic fan and you might
even be like that stephen king i tell
destiny worry for these people because
you seem to be like that stephen king
movie where you're gonna capture him
what's that movie where the the fan
captures the author
what's that movie guys what's that movie
everybody knows that movie the she
captures the author let's hope let's
hope you're never in the room with me
misery
misery that's what's gonna be this
better watch out because i i fear for
him by consulting me and stuff um but of
all the people
uh i'd love to but
because you are a robotic broken record
you keep saying things i've already
addressed you're not moving past what's
already been addressed and addressing it
in a new way you're just saying the same
thing you did before
okay you've literally said that like um
that like
you can't treat any type of subjective
science this is a pretty like
uh crazy claim oh we live in a crazy
world don't worry
okay
so i'm trying to uh there's no
subjective science all soft science is
bullshit it's not science i think that
all this is what i believe oh you know
here's what i believe all non-stem
education
uh all non-stem hardcore science
education should not only be bankrupted
destroyed abbas and so on but in a legal
way a legal way ceremoniously by the
government government will do it
ceremoniously bulldozed and burned down
really corrupt to me personally
huh
that sounds really corrupt to me um and
all the people who are peddling this
false pit they should all be thrown in
jail that's what i believe too
dude i love just taking away people's
freedom of speech i agree i i think
that's because our freedom of speech has
led to the abuse of children so i want
to protect children
um
okay do you have any evidence um
showing that like
there is some type of like abuse towards
children why why not this is so silly
this is what lacon calls the discourse
of the university why do you demand
objective efforts when you know very
well that i qualify giving children
hormonal blockers a form of abuse why do
you need evidence there is nothing
empirically industry you think
right there is nothing empirically in
dispute right now nothing is empirically
speaking in dispute you look at one
thing like for example you see bosses
for example it's not empirically in
dispute that vosh is saying pedo shit
but you just deny it's pedal shit right
so you don't have to say what is the
evidence you have to say why are you
calling it pedal shit you don't need to
this copium of uh
evidence is your copy you got evidence
you got evidence you got evidence i
didn't know what you
you got evidence
so i i didn't know what you meant by
child abuse but now you have evidence
you didn't know what i meant by child
abuse
yeah i asked it do you have evidence you
asked it
uh
i mean aren't you streaming do you have
evidence that you just asked me the
question are you streaming
um
look
it's getting late um i'd love to talk to
you again you have you have any evidence
that um it's getting late
um
and do you have any evidence that you
consider it good to talk to me if you um
if you're just gonna keep doing this
um you you have any evidence of what i'm
gonna keep doing no let's let's shift to
washington i understand let's let's
shift
i just gotta go old fashioned
or whatever yeah yeah i just got told
you defend vasha's pedophilia let's talk
about that type of stuff um like i don't
know if you're gonna
keep doing this type of well i mean
it's do you have any evidence like i
don't know dude
let's talk about your defense of washes
uh pro pedo takes
pro pedo tanks yeah
you defended them in the before right
i uh i think i said i'm pretty sure that
a lot of the clips that people were
posting were taken out of context and i
don't think wait they were taken out of
context from the discord
um yeah people were posting clips okay
yeah
situate their contacts properly
um sure so i'm pretty sure there is a
clip um i'd have to look back on it
um i'm pretty sure there was a clip
that said
um
oh vash was saying like
i think it's totally okay
for
um
for people to
um
have like
or people to like
um use child pornography
for time some type of uh
for some type of value to be gained in
society uh he said this type of claim
um
but the thing was it like cut off right
there and uh the rest of the claim was
if we are going to
um allow
different types of uh
what they call like um
things you produce
uh yeah things you produce if we're
gonna allow different types of things
you produce and like buy
um if we're going to allow these types
of things to be made by children in like
uh child labor places so he was trying
to like compare it to that it was a
really like bad comparison uh it sounds
really bad but like hold on hold on
but vosh knows that there's no way we
already are having
i'm not like
we are already consuming computers and
all that kind of stuff so the only
meaning that vos could be saying is oh
we should just allow we may as well
allow it if we're going to continue
to consume his antibiotics both so he
was anti um
he was trying to give an argument
against uh
i think he was talking about like a
vegan discussion
um and he was saying like
uh
yeah he was talking to like a vegan and
he was saying like the hypocrisy
of
um
a situation in which
someone
would say i'm not going to yeah but
that's a you know that's a pro pedal
porn cake right he's defending pedoporn
in context now ultimately he may believe
there's another ultimately ultimately he
might claim that he's that's the rape of
children right no no ultimately he may
believe that in the big rock candy
mountain there shouldn't be any but
insofar as we live in this fallen
depraved world we may as well have it
right
um
and
here's what's interesting is that
what about the other clip where he just
straight up said there's nothing morally
wrong with it
uh i'd have to see the clip i want to
watch it right now i'm not super well
read on this yeah do you want to watch
it now
yeah can you like share your screen yeah
we're going to go on and do it right now
peter wiley
wow
i uh so
my original claim that i made was i
don't think he said anything like
pedophilic um
someone in the discord uh
link it to me link it to me
uh so
vlog
i'm going to show you a few of these
actually because there's actually a lot
so we're going to just see
some not all there's way more than this
right but
sure yeah yeah
i mean
i don't know what the point of this is
like yeah sure i just want to see if
this was all taken out of context
okay sure i mean like
i don't know what um
i'm not like a huge
viewer person so i'm not going to know
every single like clip or whatever sure
sure
yeah we're going to see um
we're going to see right we're going to
see if this holds up so let's look at
vaush
and uh
i'm going to mute my mic and i'm going
to give you a chance to watch
all right cp is free if you're can you
pause the defensive path
no it's just a delay
not paying for child pornography then
there was no art wait it wouldn't be a
delay
can you shut up so we can you're you're
interrupting it you're not streaming it
yes i am there's a fucking delay
wait no there isn't if you if you share
your screen there's no delay i'm not
going to share my stream on my screen
um i thought you were going to share it
on the uh on like this just watch it on
twitch
so the audience can see too wait
wouldn't it be easier to just um have
like your youtube
like tab and then go to your share
screen thing on discord and then share
it so that we can watch it in real time
no just do this
okay let me let me open up your screen a
second
there's gonna be a delay
okay i have to open up your stream
i think it's gonna give me another cp is
free
yep
if you're not paying for child
pornography then there is no argument in
favor of morally condemning people who
get it
i would not say that it is unethical for
free person to purchase child
pornography it's just morally neutral
it's not ethical it's not unethical
should a consuming child be legal i
think that that would be yes more legal
and more ethically consistent yes
we didn't it like cut off right there in
the clip
you want to play it again
didn't it cut off right there you know
the context for why he said that
um
oh shit
um i mean i don't know the exact context
but i do know it's cut off like you
could
i mean all right let me let me ask you
uh let me ask you i don't even know how
to put this on
let me let me read you something from
walsh's discord if you need the evidence
i can send it to you from can you tell
me the context of this where this would
be uh permissible
well wait if the sex spot is just a toy
then why does it matter if an adult
fucks a kid robot
um
so
i mean he's probably being edgy i mean
is that edgy
yeah
now he's talking about lolly sex bots is
that just edgy
um
i mean
i mean technically like
if you uh
he's not wrong like if you have a
like it's not harming your children
that's that's why the take is funny i
think
wait there's nothing wrong with that
i mean if you're if it's not gonna lead
you to harming actual children if you're
just like looking at like you you don't
think that the fundamental pathology
of pedophilia
is something inherently fucked up
and you want it you think that you think
it it's okay if there's actually a
pedophile acting upon their uh
fantasies as long as no children are
involved
as long as no children get hurt yeah
i'm anti-children getting raped so as
long as you're actually cultivating
you're promoting the culture of children
eventually getting hurt well yeah yeah
if we if we're promoting something that
would lead to children getting raped i
wouldn't that of course it would happen
what do you think the fantasy comes from
um
you people you fucking people and by you
people i mean you left this you boycott
all media dave chappelle video games for
the slightest smallest shit right it's
not politically correct but you're okay
with robots that are made in the image
of children for people to uh have sex
with yeah if it leads to you you're okay
with uh vr lolliporn if it let if it
leads to less children getting raped
then yeah
are you okay i think it just speaks for
itself no i really just think this
speaks for itself are you not for things
that give children i am 100
against pedophilia in all its
manifestations
i mean i think every pedophile belongs
in prison
oh i'm at the minimum
whether they harm children or not
that's kind of fucked um
anyone who has pedophilic feelings who
has uh engaged in any type of
pornography whether it's involving real
people or not anything of that matter
should belong in prison
so
um
i mean
all culture which promotes the abuse of
children should lead to criminal charges
that's my view
um
i mean yeah if it leads to the abuse of
children yeah
all culture
no which gives expression and fantasizes
about the abusive children should be
criminalized
um
i think if you're fantasizing about
fucking
dave chappelle can't tell jokes on
netflix but this is allowed right
okay what do you think about dave
chappelle
what do i think about dave shepard yeah
should he should was netflix responsible
in giving him a platform
um
were they responsible in giving him a
platform i mean yeah that's like
objective yeah
it's okay
with you're asking are they were they
responsible i mean yeah they were no
were they was it a good thing do you
agree with their decision the platform
yeah
um yeah sure i don't i don't think like
these types of things should be
prevented from being on netflix
okay
what about
uh what about um
white supremacists on twitch or on uh
youtube what about them
um i think as a as long as they're not
um like contributing to some type of
like
advocation for harm
uh i'm not really one for like silencing
people what if they just okay what if
they just want to fantasize about it
like what if there's a game on steam
where white supremacists want to
fantasize about committing
arts of iron for
no were they
for example the game hatred and games
where people fantasize about committing
highness acts of violence against
minorities would you would you be okay
with steam having that on their platform
i mean yeah it's fine you okay with that
yeah it's called call of duty
that's what the game
so you're okay with the steam game like
uh ku klux klan role-playing game
um
i mean yeah sure you okay with it
you would not protest to have an issue
i mean i might be like that's a little
weird but
what about if it was against sexual
minorities
wait just a second what the fuck
are you playing music in your background
no
okay i just got some like epic battle
music from somewhere i don't know where
i came from
what if it was uh against like sexual
amount like transgender people and stuff
you would not have a problem with it
if they're like if it's a game
um so i mean i would have a problem with
it
so if okay
during how you're doing wait i just gave
you an example of a clan role-playing
game where you're attacking racial
minorities and
people i bring this up you're gonna have
that but black
nuance and you're gonna have second
thoughts during these issues
during these issues um i'm assuming that
like
there's no type of like outside
consequences for these things so like if
you ask me no there's no such thing as a
vacuum everything is related yeah sure
sure so it not in a vacuum yeah i'd
probably not be okay okay so steam i'm
not talking about a hypothetical world
talking about now are you are you
listening to something no i'm not i'm
talking about now
on steam
now like right now right not a
hypothetical vacuum on steam
are you okay with uh
uh nazi and ku klux klan and this kind
of violent stuff
um now just write how it is how it is
now
am i
if they made a game out of it yeah
um
yeah it'd probably be not really for
that okay so when vows talks about how
he can't wait for there to be uh or how
sorry he anticipates
that um if you really want to
f children wait 20 years for vr
lolliporn and don't tell anybody you use
it you said you kind of agreed with him
about the robots and the vr porn
did your mind change or what because you
said you agreed with him well i
um
i'm trying to figure out how the best
way to phrase this is
um
i
agree with him in the sense that like
if that
is
something that would prevent you
from
going out and like harming
uh wait but that's not hold on hold on
hold on
however we're not talking about we're
not talking about that we're talking
about here and now i'm talking about
future sex robots because it's tech
listen your original argument is that
technically shut up shut up your
original argument was not about the
consequences leading to less harm you
said since children are not being harmed
in the consumption of this media
minorities including trans people are
not being harmed in the consumption of
this violent video game hypothetically i
was talking about yeah and yeah you
managed to say
you managed to claim that you're against
it right but when it comes to pedophile
content you're for it it's okay
so in the background of these issues so
like if we're if we have a game
um
so the problem with like these like
situations since they're not in a vacuum
you have to like
uh figure out what would be the things
that would happen from these types of
situations and in some situations i
don't know i don't know what happens
when pedophiles watch lolly porn um
but that's not what you said before are
you walking back your position now
because your position before was that
since children are not involved there is
no issue i thought we were talking about
in a vacuum but there were no ways you
said since no we're not no one mentioned
the vacuum so i don't grant you that
assumption okay no one granted nobody
was
when you say like hey um if you had um a
train
and uh you could switch the train track
so that you'd kill one person instead of
five people would you do it and then i
in a vacuum i would think oh yeah i
would do that however if we actually
think about like the situation and
everything like me going and doing that
xenon xena xena you're trying to weasel
your way out so let me walk it back to
you i read out a quote by wash well wait
if the sex box is just a toy then why
does it matter if an adult fucks a kid
robot we did not talk about a vacuum we
didn't talk about the real world
consequences we talked about none of
those things all you said was that yeah
i agree with him because an actual child
is not involved and we went through the
course of argumentation on that basis
then i gave you examples of violent
video games where minorities including
trans people are not involved obviously
it's just a video game and there's
you're committing acts of violence
against them and you managed to muster
the ability to say that you would be
against this well why initially did you
say you had no issue with what val said
so
because i'm assuming in this interaction
that there's um like if
the pedophile's like watching wally porn
um then they're not going to be
going out and like raping kids because
they can do something that wouldn't harm
kids but if they just want to harm kids
um and this is like leading them towards
that then yeah that's kind of fucked and
i wouldn't want to wait wait hold on why
didn't you say that oh i'm i'm just
assuming that uh
you know you didn't say that you said
because kids are not involved there's no
issue
um
you said you agreed with vox
because you agreed with your sentence
don't talk about arming kids i said
specifically it's because it's not
harming kids you said that way after
when i cornered you i said it's because
it's not harming kids i'm pretty sure no
that's not what you said
you said because it's not harming kids
in concern
so so that's what i meant then but then
when i said for example this is what let
me explain what actually happened since
your memory is so short what i actually
said in response was you're promoting
fuck up i don't really care what i said
and what i said what i said what i meant
no i
you're trying to fucking cover up what
happened i am the one who said oh so you
want to foster a culture that's going to
lead people to commit kids oh no in that
case no i just agree with the opposite i
agree that it's not going to so when
only when i brought up the fact that
it's a culture that promotes pedophilia
which is self-evident fact you decided
to adopt the opposite position but
for example in the case of games where
you're committing violence against
minorities
all of a sudden it's common sense that
we should all agree that oh if you're
doing it in a video game you're
promoting a culture that fosters
violence against minorities then why
isn't it that when you have sex robots
you're not promoting a culture that
promotes violence against children why
is it okay to have pedophile content as
long as children aren't involved but not
content that is promoting violence
against minorities why do you have this
this why is it that one is okay not the
other
okay it's because um i don't think that
the ideation towards like wanting to
kill minorities is the same as like
wanting to have sex with why not because
i think um the ideology of
like nazism and white supremacy sure i
think these things are more of
i think these things are more
because they want to see minorities dead
um and not because they get like
satisfaction that's not necessary
so like and they don't i don't think
they get satisfaction from it
i don't think there's a visceral racial
hatred underpinning that ideology from
which they do get satisfaction
so do i have to just merely add the rape
can i
okay so in both situations um
if you if you're gonna say something
that i already anticipate i'm gonna cut
you off
by the way yeah that's fine and if you
if i don't uh i don't finish i'm gonna
cut you off
so
um
okay
when we so there's two different
variables there is wanting to
actually do it just because you like you
want to do the thing and then getting
pleasure from seeing
the thing uh
[Music]
yeah i already anticipate your fucking
argument shut the fuck up you're saying
pathological sexual satisfaction is not
inherently ideological it's a
physiological pathological sexual
satisfaction so yeah first of all that's
making two assumptions one the
assumption that violent racial hatred
and violent hatred against minorities is
not fundamentally pathological in a
psychological sense every psychoanalyst
would disagree with you on that point
the second assumption that you're making
which is other analysis
the second assumption you're making
which is fundamentally fucking wrong is
that all i would have to do according to
your own logic if we live in this la la
land according to which there is no
psychological pathology of satisfaction
and enjoyment which is not merely
ideological in a racial hatred against
minorities is add the variable of okay
what if it's just a simulator where you
can rape women i'm an incel misogynist
simulator where people massage in cells
have fantasy of being able to rape women
commit violence against women okay so i
can i can make all of these um
all of these examples the last one is
qualitatively different so you're not
gonna put it under one umbrella
okay i'm going to make all of these
um
all these situations clear okay so
um i think
it's okay
uh
for you
to
if it's like let's say you have a desire
to do something and then whenever you do
if you could do that thing but nobody
gets hurt um that desire would like go
away
um and
like for for the period of time and you
would be like um
that problem would be resolved including
violence against trans people in the
video game yeah sure if you have like
some type of i'm not saying by the way
for the audience i'm not saying in a
video game like oh i just get like i'm
saying like a steam game yeah
well so i'm not sure if like these
things should be like held to the public
if they're for these types of things
because i think that can have some like
negative implications but oh shit i
think that well no uh
it's not going to lead to any harm to
children at all in the long term yeah
why are you now wait but
yeah but intuitively speaking you know
that's not true for a video game where
you're engaging in violence against
trans people intuitively you seem to
understand
no no
intuitively you seem to be able to
understand that in that case of course
it's going to have real world
implications
because
the reason is because in this situation
um i'm assuming that the person who
wants to
uh
like kill the trans people in the video
game actually wants to kill trans people
in real life and is like going to do it
why not
um
what well yeah however in both
situations um if the person who's like
killing the trans person in the video
game if that's going to help them um not
kill trans people in real life i would
want them to i would rather them have a
video game where they can kill trans
people okay sure so why do you make the
intuitive assumption that the pedophile
is not going to lead to an outcome of
more children being harmed but in the
case of a trans game it is going to lead
to more trans people being harmed
because i think the um
the difference between these is like
pedophiles usually
they're um they just have like an
attraction to something so there's no
ideology involved right yeah i don't
think i don't think there's like a
belief so what okay
then let's since we're not going to
agree on that point let me give you
something that you probably should be
able to agree on why is it that there's
ideology involved in a rape simulator
then what if a guy is just horny and
wants to and has a kink where he
fantasizes about committing sexual
assault against women
yeah and then he goes into like a rape
simulator or whatever yeah on steam in
it and uh
and this is like closed off to the
public no
it's a public just like the pedal shit
it's a problem okay i wouldn't want it
to be public in in every single
situation
yeah i don't i i
can the pedal robot can be public
no
but but valsha said well wait if the sex
spot is just a toy then why does it
matter if an adult fucks a kid robot
when did he say that it's gonna be
public on steam
it's a house how else does this robot be
obtained
um you could go to like a therapist to
like um
like you think volkswagen is implying
this is a therapist uh
if form of therapy the therapist i mean
it might be
well that's an assumption
but let's also an assumption to assume
it's going to be like a public thing on
steam that everyone's going to be listen
listen i want to explain to you the
actual context even though it'd be just
as disgusting and highness we can go
down that route i want to just clarify
so you can't gaslight the audience about
what actually happened
bosch was implying in his discord thing
that it is completely morally uh
neutral nothing morally wrong it's just
a bot doesn't matter if an adult fucks a
kid robot because it's just a toy and
you said you agreed on that there was no
implication about therapy there was no
implication that this is going to be
closed off from the public yeah he said
he said point blank period if there's a
sex bot an adult is fucking it and it's
a child uh
it looks like a child or whatever
there's nothing wrong with it because
it's just a bot it's just a robot it's
just a toy right
yeah this is well so
yeah in that situation also he never
made an assumption that it is going to
be public so you can't like assume that
yes there is listen unless he wants okay
the burden of proof would have been on
him to clarify that it shouldn't be
public because
if he didn't want it to why would he
assume it's not going to be public why
are you assuming it is going to be
public because point blank
he said there's nothing wrong with it
and the reasoning he gave wasn't because
it's therapeutic or because maybe it's
reduced maybe i disagree with the
reasoning
is that it's just a toy
the reasoning
is that it's just a toy you may be
researching uh medical stuff logic is
not your strong suit he said it's just a
toy he didn't say it's because it's
fantastic otherwise he would have
qualified why there's nothing wrong with
it
are toys inherently therapeutic unless
is that what you mean that we should
assume toys are inherently therapeutic i
think the contrary is true i think the
contrary is true toys when most people
talk about toys they're talking about
something that you just get publicly you
don't get it from a doctor to be for
play for pleasure
okay so in that case i disagree with
vasha's that part of oh oh oh
so
we have to go through all of them
we have to go okay
so you never know because you failed it
was public because you failed
you're saying oh now i can't no way out
of this one okay i can see listen from a
common sense perspective you know what
you fucking said you know what you
fucking meant i just caught you with
your tail between your fucking legs and
you walked in
you're a fucking wow
not only are you a creep not only are
you a pedophile apologist you're a
fucking coward
fucking coward yep that's me yeah you
are a fucking car why don't you have a
seat
why don't you have a seat right over
there have a seat
okay
have a seat right over there once you
have a seat
this is boston's community by the way
ladies and gentlemen this is the people
that are making these reddits about me
this is them
caught in 4k out in the open this is who
they are
can you can you listen
to whatever can you listen after you
walked it back like a fucking coward you
know what you originally said you know
what you meant you know what you said
that you agree with vosh you know
exactly what was fucking implied nowhere
were anyone talking about therapy
nowhere could you justify
selling this idea to us that oh i
thought it was implied it was going to
be for therapy i thought it was implied
it was going to be for therapy i thought
it was implied that it was going to be
in a vacuum i thought it was implied no
you fucking didn't there's no indication
anywhere on fucking planet earth
anywhere under the fucking night sky
anywhere under tengri's blue sky that
fucking there was that fucking
implication you agreed with vosh point
blank and period and you walked it back
after i broke down why you're a fucking
hypocrite after giving you the example
of a steam game
simple as that
um
so
um
so what i was saying in the very
beginning
was that i think
it's
wait are you shaking
okay all right
so um what i was saying
in the
uh
i i didn't assume it was going to be
like a public thing because vasha's
statement never said i want this to be
like a public application let's see okay
so you you thought it was going to be on
mars because he didn't
specify it was going to be on earth i
didn't think it was because it was going
to be on mars wait but he didn't specify
it wasn't going to be on mars so we
should just roll with the assumption
that's what you thought right okay but
these we should just believe you right
if i say oh i thought
it was going to be on mars
this is if you say this thing is okay
i'm going and then i say yeah this thing
is okay in this scenario
under what conditions not just agree
with it when it's not being qualified
well if you oh okay look if you want to
uh you could you're a liar you didn't
agree with walsh's original taste well
as long as there's no children involved
it's okay then you kept adding
qualifiers because they kept cornering
you and showing and exposing the pedal
nature of vosh's community
um
okay um
i don't why y'all
yeah
yeah keep dancing keep having fun keep
having your fucking fun i'm having fun
yeah keep having your fucking fun
keep having your fucking fun right
by the way you have solidarity with
those workers at netflix
wait am i outside right there no do you
have solidarity with them
do i have solidarity with them i mean if
they want to protest they can
well they're all going to get fired
um
that sucks
too bad they're all gonna get fired
what does this have to do with anything
yeah
how how much longer do you think the
american people are gonna take their
intelligence of being comprised a bunch
of fucking pedophiles
how long before we start passing laws
putting people in prison for advocating
for the things you involved do
um i would hope never because we have no
it's gonna happen it's gonna happen
do you not believe in the freedom of
speech fuck no not when it comes to pedo
shit no
i don't believe in free speech in that
case no
no i don't
it really is the red fascism
it's the uh
anyone who's not a pedophile they call a
fascist nowadays
okay so i don't i don't care your insult
bounces off me
like bullets bounce off superman
yeah
you've called me a pedophile this entire
pedophile supporter pedophile apologist
pedophile adjacent and vos is a fucking
creep who's in all
we have everything but the proof that
he's one himself everything but that
all arrows
indicate one direction all arrows point
in one direction
all arrows point to the right
we have everything but absolutely
we have everything but absolute proof
is this
is this where you do you just like
scream at people and then like
um
i don't know dude
how long is that destiny reenactment
gonna help you cope
gonna help you cope
for how long you're gonna keep coping
pretending to be destiny what's the one
name
where it has the the one guy with like
the
um the crying thing behind a mask and it
says you're cooping you're coping
fuck out of my fucking vc
biggest fucking copy i'm ever seen in my
fucking