ISR*EL LOSING | IRAN INVASION | NO KINGS

Seven seven seven seven seven

'Kay.

No, go ahead.

Yeah, so where was I?

Yeah, another mistake that you're making is you're conflating this uh reality that there can either be the state where anarchists are fucking nothing and then all of a sudden extreme anarchism where anarchists are everywhere and the whole state is an anarchist state.

It doesn't work like that.

It's anarchism is also about the struggle to achieve anarchism, right?

Just like Marxism is about the struggle to achieve, we're trying, we're trying, we're always struggling, we're always struggling to be better, but we just can never reach it.

I don't give a fuck about that.

Why can't they achieve it?

I just told you a motherfucker who

I don't give a fuck about that's some fucking cope for fucking fat asses who fucking do yoga.

Fat ass guys who fucking do yoga to get pussy.

I don't give a fuck about that retarded idea.

I want fucking results.

Yeah, there is a result.

The Ghanaian agitation was a reverse of anarchy.

Now you can get better.

At being better people.

It's anarchism just the guiding philosophy.

No, no, no.

Results.

I just told you.

I just showed you results.

I can't believe you.

Give me a single fucking group on earth that doesn't have one leader.

One leader.

I just told you why that is not possible because it is the theory of language itself would allow me to sign that.

Give me a single example of a group on earth that can successfully conform to anarchist principles without contradicting them entirely.

How about that?

Any group can uh uh adopt anarchist principles.

Give me a single one that has done so successfully.

I just told you about Gandhi.

I just told you about how he educated people.

Gandhi is an individual.

Even if I were to believe this ridiculous notion that Gandhi individually was a consistent anarchist, Gandhi's an individual.

Give me a society, give me a group that successfully reflects anarchist principles.

What group was it?

It it was the Indian people.

They received their success through anarchism.

Get the fuck out of my fucking your di di I'm at m that's it.

He claims the Indian people were India was anarchist.

Alright, I'm done.

I don't even need to hear that.

I don't need to hear that.

I don't need to hear stupid shit my whole life.

I don't just I don't need to just sit here and hear stupid shit, alright?

What is this, a circus?

What are we even talking about?

Yeah.

Hold on a sec, let me just mute the kick stream.

Okay.

Where are you speaking through Kik or are you speaking through Discord?

Okay, go go.

Okay, so should I just get started then?

Okay, uh so I guess I just want to pick your brain about how since you you talk about it somewhat and I've heard it from Carlos too, how dual power strategy will work, um, as things go on.

Uh I mean I guess I I could I could find something to debate about where I I'd take your brain, whichever you want.

You're not sticking on it.

Debate or Q and A?

I guess I just want to pick your brain about that.

You want to pick my brain?

Well, go pick your fucking ass first.

'Cause all I smell is shit.

You know, I would say let's crab it up, but I can't even justify it.

I guess my Xi Jinping lecture was good, but uh

The stream really got fucked up badly.

Quite badly.

Quite badly.

Uh we lost a hundred viewers.

That's great.

Lost momentum, lost a lot.

Carlos, what's up?

Because uh I fucking because the my internet just decided to fuck me again.

After I thought I had gotten fixed and called uh everyone and thought I I talked to I'm gonna have to talk to the automated customer service again, that's wonderful.

You know, I'm not meant for this shit.

You know, I'm not meant for this shit.

I'm meant to be

I'm meant to be riding horses around with tents, raiding villages and shit.

I'm not meant to be talking to ITT customer support and to fucking automated fucking customer service 1-800 numbers so that my fucking internet can be fixed so I can yell at the world through the fucking computer.

I'm not meant for that.

I gotta keep doing this shit until shit gets real though.

C D, what's up?

TikTok debates?

Um

Alright, we're gonna do two things.

If you want me to stay here and we do it,

No, it's too late for it, honestly, and it's too late.

I'm not gonna do TikTok shit.

Way too late.

It's not that late.

Bro, it's late.

Alright, ones, if you want me to do TikTok debates.

Is there really an amphibious assault being staged?

Yeah, they're planning it.

Um

Alright, I'll give the people what they want.

Fuck it.

Comrade Kit all right, that's some encouragement.

Y'all wanna y'all wanna keep want me to stick around and give me some encouragement?

You know how I'm just kidding.

I'll just do it.

I'll give y'all what you want.

I'll give the people what they want, 'cause I'm a good person.

Yo Dan, what's up, bro?

Yeah, we're just gonna do it.

We're just gonna get right into it.

But I'm going to tell you guys something.

If I lag again, we're done.

Lawn guy, what's up with the four?

Yellowstone, what's up, man?

Guys, if I lag even one more time, we are finished, okay, with tonight.

So, if it happens one more time, just assume that I'm not going to reset it, and it's going to be a good night, and we're going to be done.

All right.

Uh so I need a good bait title.

Um

Alright, I'm just gonna do the humble one for people that have no clout.

Grandma, what's up?

Which is ask me anything.

Because when you have no clout, you just have to just kind of be a chill guy who just like, hey, I'm here.

You can ask me anything.

All right.

When I have no clout on TikTok, no Kings related.

Oh, fuck.

I have to cha I have to restart the whole thing to change the title.

Yeah, let's talk about No Kings.

It's just called No Kings is for Losers.

That's my title.

I don't know if that's gonna get anyone.

So, uh what is there to say really?

No Kings is um some Democrat nonsense and all the purity fetishes people have about ACP and they want to problematize the transgender stuff that we don't even care about or even talk about.

Um

But they're okay rubbing shoulders with Zionists and pro NATO supporters.

I know that people said there was eight million people who attended these protests.

I'll break down the numbers for you.

Of those eight million, four two million were boomers who are already dinosaurs, that don't matter.

Uh f four million are soy.

Um, uh-oh, I gotta put my thing.

Four million are uh soy low testosterone males who are looking for some poo.

Can we say it on TikTok?

They're looking for some females.

And the rest were the mentally ill people.

Uh and and that's it.

That's all the people who are that's the masses of no kings.

I just broke it down for you.

It's a combination of crazy blue sky boomers.

Uh low testosterone males who are looking to get laid.

And the mentally insane.

And it's all a Democrat psyop.

And you're not canceled for grifting off of this, but MAGA Communism was.

Cancelable?

What are we talking about?

So, uh, we're here to, you know, you can request for a debate.

If nobody requests for a debate in 10 minutes, this is over.

I don't have patience.

I'm fucking hungry.

And I don't need to

Frankly, you still support Trump?

Ian, I'm glad you're here.

Of the ten people that are on TikTok,

I'm glad you're here because I want to calmly explain to you.

Um I want I want to s I wanna I want to you're here.

seized, so to speak, right?

Um, I want you to understand you are not human.

You are that low IQ.

Yo fuck you fascist pig, fuck you fascist, fuck you fascist, fuck you fascist.

What what is there to argue about you don't understand co you don't understand socialism.

Your entire organization doesn't understand socialism, it's it's fascist, man.

It's how do I goodness?

Okay.

First, your entire thing isn't because like cla isn't because class relations are bad, you're revolting because of another reason.

The one ones if the mic's good.

Hold on.

Can you can you repeat yourself?

Why are we fascist and why why are we not socialist?

You aren't revolting because of class properly um um class um material conditions.

You're voting for another reason.

W you're voting for like some elite bullshit.

How old are you?

What's your age?

My age.

My age is fuck fascist.

They just left?

I was going to ask their age because what a ridiculous, uneducated, immature thing to say.

You're fascist because you're not motivated by material conditions.

According to Marxism, everyone is motivated by material conditions, including fascists.

So, the notion that people aren't compelled to political activity on the basis of material conditions is a f that you're repudiating the basics of Marxism.

Marxism regards all political activity to be compelled by material conditions.

To make material conditions into some kind of normative cause.

some moral cause for why you should actually be a communist is just ridiculous.

M you you're completely confused about the things you're trying to talk about.

And if and this was a sample of the type of people that

Call us fascists and say we're not real Marxists and socialists.

I asked them, How old are you?

Because I'm guessing this is not an adult, that this is a minor.

And they left.

So here we are.

Uh dishing fed who sleazy are you anti or pro?

I can't even tell who you're aiming that towards.

That is not an adult.

For sure that is not an adult.

That was not an adult.

That is a yeah, that's either a middle schooler or a high schooler.

That was a ridicul that was such a ridiculous thing.

Uh feel free to request

Eurasian K what a ridiculous thing Eurasian KKE there's KKE is not Eurasian KKE is the most quintessentially Western European dogmatic sect there is the difference between KKE and any other sect is that they get millions and millions of dollars from being on the European and Greek parliament.

That's why they're they're very loud because they have those they get that money that they get from uh the EU.

They're literally funded by the EU.

They're institutionally tied to the EU.

ACP is Fed LARPing.

I didn't see an argument there, so I don't even know if I should respond to that.

Uh based on what?

What are you talking about?

What what organizations would you compare us to that you think we're worse than?

For example, we live in the real world.

We're the only real Communist Party, it's just the truth.

Who are you going to compare us to in America?

We're the only real Communist Party in America.

I'm sorry.

But and I'm not saying we are the best in terms of like this is the best everything could possibly be.

It just doesn't get much better than this right now.

Really, it doesn't.

I mean, like, who's going to do it better than ACP right now?

Who's doing it better?

Really, think about it.

Who's doing it better than ACP?

Communism doesn't enjoy a high status in this country, and right now nobody's doing it better than ACP.

If you can't see that, you're mentally ill.

I'm sorry.

It's like communism in America is not doing very well in terms of the brand and whatever.

I get that.

But in terms of who are the communists that show promise and are doing, yeah, of course, it's ACP.

Who else is it?

Who else?

If not us, who else?

What could a Communist Party possibly look like right now that we're not already doing or trying to do?

That will always be my question.

Like, who else?

Okay, if not us, then who?

That's just going to be like my argument.

If not us, then who?

Do y'all do anything IRL?

Of course we do.

I mean a cursory glance at our social media timeline, the ACP one, would reveal that to you.

So uh all the prog yeah, th the the guy joined, he said, Fuck you fascist, fuck you fascist, and then left because he had no argument for how we could possibly be a fascist organization.

You have to put debate prompts.

I don't know how to do that.

I'm sorry.

Needs needs text on screen.

Okay.

Step by step, I'm on the TikTok live studio, I don't know how to do that.

I genuinely do not know how to do that.

Thoughts on uh Nazbulls?

You know what's interesting, Russia nozbels are so different.

Um Nosbolism is a cr cringy LARP ideology because usually when you're on the internet and you see someone call themselves that, it's a Brazilian anime gooner.

And or it's some kind of like West European LARPer who thinks they know what Russian Nazbulls are or we're like or what they believe.

Oh, we're just gonna combine fascism with communism.

And that's how leftists think of it, and that's also how the LARPer right-wingers in the West think of it.

Notice none of these people are Russian and therefore lack the context to understand who the Nazbuls actually were, what they are, what they actually are like, and what they believe.

I'm not a Nasbull myself, but Russian Nazbulls are straight up nothing like what people think they are in the West.

Trump is in the Epstein Files.

Okay?

So are all the Democrats who bankroll no kings.

So are the Democrats who bankroll no kings.

So, what's your point?

What makes Democrats better?

That's the burden on you is to show why Democrats are better, not that Trump is bad.

Chiefs, the burden is on you to show why the Democrats are better, not that Trump is bad.

We know Trump is bad.

Show, tell us why the Democrats are better, though.

That's the burden you have.

Okay, so this is a DNC bot.

What about the German ones?

Yeah, that was just some nonsense in the 20s, you mean, with Ernest Nikish or whatever.

It's just kind of some nonsense.

It's not even worth consideration.

The Russian ones are totally divorced from that lineage, by the way.

You're talking about a sociological phenomenon in the case of Russia, a subculture.

I'm a hold on, I'm a CPSA leader trying to keep my chapter from falling to liberalism.

What do?

Um

Just join ACP.

I don't I don't know.

Like, wha wha why don't you just join ACP?

'Cause we w if you want our opinion, we just kinda thought that was a lost cause.

Um

You may disagree, but that's going to be my opinion, I'm sorry.

Hey, the guy who's spamming about Trump, we need to get rid of that guy.

Because I gave him the opportunity to explain how Democrats are better and he won't elaborate, so he's gone.

Sorry, bye-bye.

A CP is useless.

Uh how, one, how, and two, compared to what in America?

Like, what organization do you think is useful?

What communist organization in America is useful in your mind?

I'm not claiming we are uh gonna win the next presidential election.

I am saying this is a measure of how much communists can accomplish in America right now.

And if you think otherwise, show me the opposing evidence.

They're MAGA communist.

PSL is better.

Uh PSL has 1400 members, we have a little less than that.

Um they have hundreds more than us, which is a lot based on our measure measurements.

Uh, but the PSL really just organizes protests.

That's all they do, really.

And if you think that the most effective strategy to build an organization that for communists to be doing is to organize protests.

You have to ask the question what about building dual power?

What about building the crucial long-term, not the exciting part where everyone wants to go out on the street and yell, but the tedious work that Lenin talked about, where you have to go down to the people and you have to build a base among the masses, among the working class, for a long-term strategy to build dual power.

Now PSL is very good at capturing excitement and protests and stuff, but those don't last forever.

So when you say PSL is better, I disagree.

I tried HP, I was randomly removed.

Okay, y y you can message me on Telegram.

I don't know.

I don't know what I don't know what what the reason for that would be.

Elect Democrats everywhere.

Why?

Give me a single argument.

Opinions on looks maxing.

Um

I

I uh could not be m less interested in something, to be honest.

I think it's incredibly uh anti-cosmic.

If you have faith in cosmos, then you accept that you look like what you deserve to.

If you want to look different, be different.

Uh this micromanaging and this meticulous attention to detail, I just

Good luck.

PSL is successfully organizing better than other parties including ACP.

Where's the evidence for that?

The PSL has at its disposal tens of millions of dollars from Roy Singham.

I don't see any examples of the PSL planting itself in communities in the long term.

I don't see examples of PSL pioneering and being at the vanguard of unionization attempts for workers.

All I see is them leading protests, so please explain how they're better at organizing.

Go ahead, uh, Walt.

Hey, what's up, dude?

Uh, I'm like not a communist, but we should elect Democrats instead of Republicans.

Okay.

Why?

Uh, they'll win and they'll govern properly.

Okay.

By the way, this is like a really bright idea, right?

I don't know.

It's just like you think I would consider this a new idea?

Yes.

Oh, okay.

No, no, really, I'm intrigued because I could have sworn there was an era where Democrats controlled the House and had the presidency.

And I think they had a majority in the Senate.

Yeah, under Biden.

You know, when he got elected?

Yeah, he did.

Remember that?

Remember when Biden was elected and the Democrats controlled the House and the Senate?

Good times, man.

So why did the American people decide to vote for Trump if it was so swell under the Democrats?

It wasn't swell, dude.

We were in a global pandemic.

Oh, it was just the pandemic.

What do you say?

Is that your talking point?

Is your DNC shill?

And this is what you think people will buy up and eat up?

I get paid.

It's awesome.

No, I believe you.

You have to get paid.

You told me the reason the Democrats didn't perform well to the American public under Biden's presidency was just because of the pandemic.

Do you expect anyone to believe that?

You just said people should vote Democrat rather than Republicans.

Okay, the American people have felt what it was like when Democrats are in power.

And they were very much against the Democrats when they were in power.

So what about Democrats is better?

Democrat which Democrat is better?

No, what about the Democrats being in power is better?

They govern.

They govern properly.

Like, look at the you know, you don't, you don't mean to you do not mean to say they govern properly.

You mean to say that they're more professional optically when they govern.

No, I mean they govern properly.

Okay, based on what?

Under Biden, we had record inflation.

Under Biden, we were dragged nearly into the World War III because of his reckless policy with respect to Ukraine and Taiwan, by the way.

Under Biden, we bankrolled a genocide in Gaza for one year.

That was under his watch.

No one else can be blamed for that in terms of another president except him.

And Biden, by the way, was senile while the Democrats were lying to us and telling us he was in good shape cognitively.

We were entering skyrocket debt.

Life was not getting better for the American people at the everyday level, not at the grocery store, not at the everyday level.

The quality of jobs continued to decline.

There is no meaningful qualitative change that the Democratic Party was able to affect while it was in power that in any way even slightly addressed the fundamental material conditions that gave rise, that led people to be so disgruntled with the system that it led them to go to Trump.

They did not address those underlying conditions.

If they did, please give me an example of how.

The expansion of the child tax credit.

Okay.

So you're saying the child tax credit addressed the fundamental return.

Dude, it helped people.

Okay.

You know what else helps people?

Charity.

What is this stupid, spineless, disgusting, morally depraved argument?

Well, we're just going to sprinkle some crumbs on people.

Yeah, I know it helps people.

The fact those people needed that help in the first place is a disgrace.

What about the infrastructure bill?

What about it?

I didn't see the results of it.

Did you?

Who saw the results of Biden's infrastructure bill?

There's signs in my town that say this was funded by the bipartisan infrastructure.

What was funded?

Because I live in Michigan.

I live in Michigan about maybe an hour away from Flint, and the water has not been fixed in Flint, Michigan.

So you need to explain to me a measurable example of Biden's infrastructure bill that made even 1% of a difference.

I l I don't I don't know what you want me to tell you, like where where like some Where, yeah, because all we saw was the trains the trains derailing and the bridges crumbling.

All was happening under Biden.

What was it where was the infrastructure?

You mean to sit here, this is why you Democrats, you Democrats are the most spineless, disgusting people.

You mean to sit here and tell us that we were living in paradise under Biden and that we were getting infrastructure and the child tax credits just made so much of a difference that it somehow addressed meaningfully the underlying conditions and reasons why people are losing their minds politically?

Oh well it helped people, it helped people.

Okay, a fucking billionaire who's throwing $1,000 at a bum and then pissing on him, that also fucking helps.

Does it address the underlying injustice for why our system is so dysfunctional that this happens in the first place, that people would need such a thing?

Oh, uh help people.

Oh, let's bow to the Pharaoh.

Let's bow to the Pharaoh of the Democrats.

I'm gonna get on my hands and knees.

Oh, they're like gods.

They're helping people.

Oh, they help them.

Oh, we owe them so much.

Oh, I owe them my life.

Hey, look, man.

They're helping.

What a ridiculous, disgusting argument.

They do better than Republicans.

How?

What do you mean how?

How?

Give me a single example.

My example was the infrastructure bill.

The infrastructure bill was a nothing.

It was a nothing sandwich.

Inflation spiraled out of control under Biden.

How was it better under Biden?

He brought it down.

We were it was a global supply chain shock.

Biden brought the inflation down, really.

It wasn't an inflationary crisis all the way up to the election in November.

What was the inflation rate?

Tell me.

It was 2.5%, I think.

Okay.

This is just playing with numbers and to trick people because the price of goods did not go down.

They just said, oh, it's no longer an inflationary spiral because we're officiating the inflation prices.

Inflation works.

Yeah.

So it's BS.

We're just going to switch the numbers around.

In the long term, the price of goods are still where they're at.

They never actually went down.

I'm trying an example.

No.

No, no, no.

You're talking about the rate.

You're talking about the rate of the increase.

You're talking about the rate.

No, no, no.

He didn't bring down the inflation.

He brought down.

He didn't brought down the rate.

No, no.

The rate at which it was increasing went down, not because he brought it down, by the way.

Yes.

No.

No, because that's how inflation works.

He didn't actually for him to actually reduce the inflation price of goods down.

Okay.

He brought down the rate of the increase of the price of goods.

Okay, he slowed it down a little bit, right?

How did he do that?

Okay, what was okay?

Tell me, tell me what the peak percentage of inflation was under his administration.

Tell me, tell me, no, no, no, no, no, no.

I'm in charge.

You listen to my questions.

How did Biden, what was the function by which he brought it down?

If he was such a wizard and he was such a good president, he did this miracle of bringing down the rated inflation.

How did he do that?

I'm sorry, I got distracted.

Your question was.

Yeah.

How did Biden, what was the function by which he was able to slow down the inflationary spiral?

Because he didn't end the spiral.

It continued.

No, he passed the Inflation Reduction Act.

Which did what?

I don't know the specifics of it exactly.

Yeah, I know you don't because you're guessing.

You don't need to guess.

Because the inflation rate across every U.S.

president since Bretton Woods has had ups and downs that are in no way a consequence of good or bad governance.

How can wait, ups and downs are of no consequence to good or bad governance?

No, because it's a first of all, it's a cycle.

The inflation doesn't decrease.

It's a cycle.

Okay, so it's out of our hands.

You know what?

I have to mute this wild animal because you keep interrupting me.

What I'm actually saying is very simple.

The inflation continues to spiral out of control in ways that measurably increase the quality of goods, the quality, and the cost of living.

The cost of living kept going up.

Now, relatively speaking, the rate at which it's going up can be more intense or less intense.

But the fundamental degradation of people's quality of life continued in the direction it was going in.

Biden did not reduce the cost of living for people, to be clear.

He did not reduce the cost of living.

I didn't say that.

That's the only thing that matters.

When rent is so high, and then, okay, slightly the rate at which it's going up is kind of slowing down a little bit, that doesn't change the fact that it has become unaffordable.

Life became unaffordable.

Biden did not address that.

That's what matters.

You're strawmanning my arguments.

Okay.

If Biden did not make life less unaffordable, how is he a good president?

Okay, to your first point, I disagree with you, 'cause he did make life more affordable.

How?

Please help.

Okay, Trump stimulus in his first term.

Trump Trump just gave out free money.

Anyone that doesn't mean you're making I'm sorry, wait, wait.

The what, the COVID stimulus checks?

Yeah, the COVID stimulus checks and Trump's cutting the tax rate.

That's an economic necessity because if we didn't stimulate the economy, it would have crashed harder.

And someone could say that the child tax credit was an economic necessity because what?

What does it ultimately do, though, as far as the actual cost of living is concerned?

Does it slightly kind of a little bit alleviate?

Imagine you're being literally pissed on.

I'm bringing up these things that you're doing.

I'm just going to make a quick point.

Please, host.

You bring up these things that make good progress, the steps in the right direction.

And then I'm just saying.

You know what?

You know what?

Well, what was the average effect?

What was the average effect of the child tax credit as far as what people were actually taking home in ways that they could use?

Because you haven't, first of all, I want to preface this by saying.

I think it was like $2,000 or $3,000.

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

You're not going to say I think.

You're going to give me the exact thing.

Because here's the reality.

The reality is life becomes fundamentally unaffordable.

The cost of living becomes fundamentally unaffordable.

People are sinking into debt.

Now, you're saying, well, the child tax credit helps alleviate that a little bit.

Okay.

What are we talking about here?

Because we're talking about a drop in a pond, a drop in an ocean of debt is what you're talking about.

You're right.

That is what I'm talking about.

Right.

And that's incrementally a step in the right direction, according to you, right?

So how long will it take us for us to be to actually reach the direction of our economy not spiraling into unsalvageable dysfunction because people can't even afford the roof over their head, which is where we're kind of at and where we've been at.

Don't get me wrong, man.

It feels that way.

I just think it's better.

It's going to be like 500 years before we, you know, walk in.

It's not a step in the right direction, even if I'm going to agree with that premise, which I don't, when it would take the equivalent of however many steps it would take to walk, you know, 500 trillion light years.

Even if that was true, that infinitesimally it's a step in the right direction, it is so profoundly meaningless.

It is so profoundly meaningless that we just shouldn't take it at all.

No, what you should do is put your effort and energy into actually addressing the root cause of why our country's so fucked up.

You should absolutely spend zero percent of your effort pushing for some kind of incremental betterance, which isn't even there, but it's not even incrementally better.

There have always been advantages in this the okay, if we're speaking in infinitesimals, there are ways in which Republicans are infinitesimally better than Democrats and vice versa.

There's always pros and cons.

Every single administration consistently there's pros and cons with respect to in infinitesimal incremental betterance.

Right now the con the con is in the executive office.

He's a con man.

Was Biden a con man?

No, he's a good man.

Really?

Was Biden not involved in the Borisima deal with the Ukrainian oligarchs?

No, he wasn't.

Yeah, he absolutely was.

He absolutely was.

He absolutely was.

You're talking about Hunter Biden talking to the big man, right?

Yeah, and Hunter Biden's laptop.

What happened?

Nothing.

Nothing happened.

Really?

You are even more brainwashed than Trump's biggest supporter right now.

Trump might have the biggest cheerleader.

You are more brainwashed than Trump's biggest cheerleader right now.

Tell me, bro.

Tell me.

Tell me what they charged Hunter Biden with.

Nothing because it was corrupt.

They got him on like a stupid gun charge.

Yeah, yeah, because it was systemic corruption.

Systemic corruption.

If it was corruption, Biden would have just canceled the investigation.

It wasn't.

You think Biden had the political capital to cancel the biggest political nationwide scandal in the country?

That he doesn't have the ball.

He never had the ball, Suzu Saul.

Actually, I agree with you.

I agree with you.

Yeah, yeah.

I'm glad you have a little bit of a head on your shoulders that you can see how real.

I agree.

This is what I agree with.

It was the biggest political scandal in the nation.

At the time.

It was on the headline news.

So for him to cancel the investigation, he doesn't have the political capital.

That just goes to show just how normal things were.

That's some made-up ass story.

About some Ukraine deal was the biggest deal in the country.

Yeah, yeah.

The biggest deal, the biggest deal in the country while people were dying from drug overdoses because their lives were being devastated.

Yeah, that's happening today, bro.

Yeah, it's been happening.

I agree.

The Democrats don't make a difference.

Our country spirals in a direction.

The Democrats don't make a difference.

They absolutely don't make a meaningful difference.

Okay, see that's not what you just said.

Like what's meaningful to you?

Utopia tomorrow?

First of all, you sick, disgusting swine, who's talking about utopia?

Do we have to speak of utopia?

Do we have to speak of utopia to allude to the possibility that our country could be 5% as competent and normal as the People's Republic of China?

Is China a utopia?

Why have we turned it why have we why have we made it?

Why do we allow these disgusting shills to convince us that our demand for basic human dignity, the basic ability to afford life in a dignified way, somehow is a utopian demand?

Somehow that's unthinkably utopian.

No, we can't.

It's impossible.

That's not my point.

Absolutely.

It's your point.

You're claiming that it's a utopia, that we have to accept the insane dysfunctional system that we have right now.

We have to.

By the way, why do we have to?

Why do we have to?

No, you are throwing away our insane dysfunctional system because you think it's insane and dysfunctional.

I think it's functional.

I think it's insane.

The majority of Americans don't agree with you.

That's why you have to sit here and convince people to vote Democrat.

If people love the Democrats so much, they wouldn't.

Why do they pay you?

If people love Democrats so much, they wouldn't need to pay you.

Oh, you're right.

Fuck.

Yeah, even if you're joking about them paying you, they do fucking pay people.

I know people they pay.

So I do they do pay people on TikTok.

Yeah.

By the way.

Yo, hook it up, bro.

Yeah.

So contact.

I need a dollar.

Yeah, yeah.

But

If Look man, who would you vote for?

No one.

I wouldn't waste my time.

Alright, well well then don't complain when like nothing you want to happen in government happens.

Did Genghis Khan ever cast a vote?

I am a mongoloid.

No, I answer it.

Did he did he cast the vote?

Okay, that's ridiculous to you, right?

So did Lenin cast a vote?

Did Che Govar cast a vote?

Did Mao Seiton cast a vote?

Nah.

No, they didn't.

I'm a bad, evil person.

For you, liberals, you Democrat liberals, understand this.

I am a bad, evil person.

I'm not here.

I hate your democracy.

I hate your liberalism.

I hate your system.

I hate your values.

I hate your fake, so-called respectable liberal democracy, your Karl Popper, your George Soros.

I am the incarnation of the authoritarian, evil tyranny, the totalitarian Lenin, totalitarian Mao, totalitarian Plato, totalitarian Stalin.

This is me.

Do you understand?

Evil, extreme, you call us fascist, red fascist.

You need to understand, I don't live, I don't respect your so-called civilization.

I want to destroy your so-called civilization.

Do you understand?

You're talking to me telling me about voting and casting ballots, or you're not going to go.

You think I respect a ballot box?

Look at me in the eyes.

You think I respect a ballot box?

Look at me.

I don't think you do.

Absolutely not.

So understand who you're talking to before you sit here and insult me talking about ballot boxes.

Oh, you don't vote, so don't complain about anything.

No, no, I will do what is necessary by the mandate of heaven.

I will do what is necessary without any regard for the institution of so-called democracy.

All right.

So, this is where it stands.

And I will tell as many people as I possibly can to avoid putting any of their energy, even 1% of their energy, in this disgusting, corrupt, Epstein fake democracy sham and put 100% of their energy in building alternative sources of authority and chains of command and power, so that when this system eventually does get to the point of no return in a constitutional crisis, the American people will have the ability to fall back on the infrastructure necessary to reassert their popular sovereignty.

That's what I stand for.

I don't stand for that.

I understand you.

I absolutely understand you.

You are a cuckold slave because you don't have rights.

You don't have popular sovereignty.

At any moment, the CIA can do anything they want to you and get away with it.

You absolutely have no rights.

You have no rights.

You have no sovereignty.

Your voice doesn't matter.

You're ruled by an Epstein regime, which is both Democrat and Republican, by the way, who are in the Epstein files.

They can do whatever they want with impunity.

You can't so much as jaywalk without a cop harassing you.

This is the system that you live in.

This may not apply to you personally, but unless you're at the very top in their inner circle, for any reason whatsoever, if you decide to step out of line, if you decide to speak against the system, they can do anything they want with you and get away with it.

You have no rights at all.

Your voice doesn't matter.

This is not the republic.

Uh that was built in seven.

This is not the republic enumerated in the US Constitution.

There's no popular sovereignty.

The people's will doesn't matter.

The majority of Americans hate the government.

Nobody cares.

Majority of Americans didn't want war.

Nobody cares.

Majority of Americans were against being involved in Ukraine.

No one cared.

No one cared because it doesn't matter.

Americans who spoke out against Biden and spoke their opinion, they're Russian agents.

FBI came and got them.

Nobody cared.

Because they can do whatever they want and you're nothing.

Because you're not human, you're a slave.

So for you to sit here and tell me I should acquiesce to this slavery and indignity where I have no fucking rights and they can do literally do anything they want and get away with it, and I should accept this system and not spend every fucking would you ever like run for office?

No, why the fuck would I?

To make change to enact change.

I don't need to enact change.

Change is coming.

Change is coming.

Change is coming.

You need to understand what this debate is about.

We're not arguing about whether there should be change.

Change is coming.

We're arguing about whether a dignified human being should spend even 1% of their energy responding to that inevitable change by mentally molesting themselves by casting a vote for the Democratic Party.

That is a form of self-mental molestation.

Who do you think in the change that is coming?

Would it be easier for the change to happen under Democrats or Republicans?

Are they like the change?

The change is absolutely coming at the expense of what we call the United States of America as an institution.

There's no positive look at me in the eyes.

You think I'm AOC?

Look at me in the eyes.

No, I want you to answer my question.

No, no, no.

What do you think I mean by change?

The institution will fall.

No, no, no, no, no.

You are absolutely possible.

The institution will fall.

Who would be easier to?

What you're what you're trying to say

What you're trying to say?

Is that by change, I mean some hippy-dippy age of Aquarius thing where we're, oh, it's all gonna get better.

I'm not talking about that.

No, you mean like the government's gone.

I'm talking about a systemic, terminal systemic dysfunction.

I'm talking about the political fragmentation of the United States of America.

I know.

No, I do understand that.

Okay.

So, who would you want to go up against?

Democrats or Republicans?

What do you mean?

Like this change is coming.

Yes, and no one can stop it.

So is it easier for this change to happen?

Like, what's the path of least resistance?

Because there is no resistance.

There is no resistance.

There is nothing resisting this tendency.

It simply is accelerating exponentially.

Nothing can resist this tendency.

Whatever, dude.

There's no way to resist the tendency of terminal systemic dysfunction.

There's absolutely no way that the institutions of government enumerated in the U.S.

Constitution can sustain and reconcile the contradictions that have been born as a consequence of changes and revolutions in the productive forces within society that have fundamentally outmoded the material premises of what we call the United States of America.

The United States of America will end.

It's as simple as that.

Like 10 years.

I'm not a fortune teller.

Look at me.

Look at me.

Do you think I am a.

You think I am uh what's his name?

In the machine?

In the machine?

Yeah, what's his name?

I d I don't know.

Uh yeah, green, green people, tell me, tell me what what Zoltar, you think I'm Zoltar?

What's that reference?

Oh, look at that.

I know, I know.

No, no, no, look at me, look at me.

Do I look like Zoltar?

No.

Okay.

I'm I'm glad you have eyes.

I think you should take electoral politics more seriously.

That's pretty gay.

Yeah, it is.

It is.

It's genuinely like gay.

It's boring.

It's genuinely gay.

I'm just going to be honest with you.

Like, it's genuinely gay.

I mean, you can ask.

No, like, it's extremely cringy.

Like, what are you talking about?

Electoral politics?

Like, this is some shit that college kids in the Young Democrat club who wear lanyards and want to intern because they want to, I don't know, become career politicians or something.

Like, you sound like SDL or some shit.

It's so cringy.

Oh, electoral politics should be.

You're talking about mental molestation and cuckoldry because you're a kuffer.

You're a kuffer.

What are you talking about?

You are a cuffer.

You're a cuffer.

You're a cuffer.

Kuffer?

You're a kuffer.

You're simply a kufr.

You're a pagan.

You sit in these institutions in this section of the division of labor and you say, Well, we just have to cuck to Epstein and just bow to it and just go.

Why should I?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Based on what?

Why shouldn't you, bro?

Why?

Why?

Why should I run for office?

Why should, why, why, why?

Go run for office.

Okay, like, okay, bro.

30 years from now, the whole Epstein regime will be dead.

Like, of old age, I mean, of old age.

Like, these people are old people.

They will go away.

Someone needs to run the government.

That could be you.

No, General Butt Naked is going to be running entire s neighborhoods and sections of the entire country.

Who's General Butt Naked?

The future of many parts of America.

Who is General Butt Naked?

I don't know.

Look it up.

Look it up.

I don't know if I want to look that up.

I don't know it's like this whole once this whole Epstein thing it's not gonna be a generation you think there's gonna be a non-violent be a non it's gonna be like a non-violent turn of the generations

It could be, if you were in charge.

It especially would not be if I was in charge, I promise.

My promise especially would not be if I was in charge.

Joe in chat says Jared Kushner owns half my state.

Me too, bro.

But like what tell me a single example of revolutionary change anywhere in history that wasn't ugly.

Doesn't have to be revolutionary.

Change doesn't always happen.

Give me a single example of qualitative change happening anywhere in any time and any place in the world that wasn't a revolution.

Women's suffrage in America.

Women's suffrage in America.

Oh, yeah, like the suffragettes.

That's an example, man.

They were dressed like the flappers, right?

And they just, it was just like a such a you know what it was like?

It was like SNL, and they're just kind of these SNL New York liberals celebrating about how everything's like under Obama when we would watch SNL and learn about how better everything was getting while we were droning kids and while we were coming like a total mass surveillance state where you know the Peter Tom peeping peeping Toms and would be listening and having access to all your private information and there's nothing you could do about it and Obama could just drone you as citizens but it was like SNL and the Conan O'Brien the homosexual Conan O'Brien he'd just be telling us about how everything's getting better he's just get gay marriage Stephen Colbert and LM are just smiling at us telling us how much women's suffrage how much how much society is getting better

Good times, right?

Good times, right?

And all the liberal, like the theater kids were just like so happy because nothing was mean and ugly on TV.

And then we just devastated and destroyed Libya, destroy entire nations, and genocide them and exterminate entire peoples, bring back slavery into Libya and North Africa when it was gone for a long, long time.

Obama was just like droning children around the world.

It was all in Syria.

We devastated Syria.

Remember when we devastated Syria?

Oh, he left.

I just systematically dismantled on a deep psychological level his entire worldview.

I just addressed the fundamentals of his pathological liberal worldview by attacking SNL, by the way.

That's what did it, by the way.

The theater kid thing, the liberal theater kid thing, when I attacked SNL, he was done.

By the way, that was a major attack.

Go ahead, Liam.

Yeah, so huge support here for like Kamala Harris.

Are you a Kamala Harris fan?

Are you trolled?

No, I just wanted to say, I mean, one thing I think which was pretty amazing for her record was from 1990 in California to 2017 that she absolutely prosecuted zero priests from the clergy that were inappropriate with literally hundreds, if not thousands, of children.

She actively actually covered up all of this stuff.

I don't know if you've read into this at all, but this is some good information on her.

She used their campaign funds as very beneficial to her future.

So yeah, a lot of good, good information here that I don't think the liberals like to talk about or really even know about.

Yeah, okay.

I mean, that's like SM Epstein shit under a Kamala.

I know you're being sarcastic for all the Autistic people, but uh, you know, let's bring on King Ratchet.

Go ahead, King Ratchet.

Go ahead, King King Ratchet, go ahead.

Sorry, I want to connect you to uh AirPods so we can have a conversation about this.

Think.

Primarily wa while you're dealing with liberals, it is fairly it is fairly easier to have a conversation with them because No, it's not.

It's really hard actually.

But what do you think that?

Uh, because uh, unless the traditional MAGA person is so easy to talk to compared to that, because the traditional MAGA person is pissed off and angry at the system and has a lot, a lot to complain about and keeps saying the media is lying to us, saying it's all fine.

It's not fine.

That's my average conversation with a MAGA person under Biden.

And you talk to a Biden supporter, and they're just saying how everything's so fine and how the child tax credit helps so much.

So, the bare one, like the premise that things are really bad.

You can't talk to Democrats.

I mean, if you're a Marxist, you have we have to be on the same page that things are pretty bad.

And I guess now liberals accept that things are pretty bad, but investigate the reasoning they give.

They say things are bad because Trump is incompetent, because he's mismanaging things, because he's hurting our NATO alliance, and all these k he's they're not actually addressing on a material level why things are bad.

They're saying that Trump is a disruption to an otherwise swell regime.

That's a fundamental non-starter if you're a Marxist.

Yeah.

I I I hear you.

I think my major pushback is like while we're both Marxists, I think I am a decolonial Marxist.

So like I think fundamentally we would we would disagree on that.

No, practically we wouldn't.

Why not?

Because if you were an effective agent against the state, practically, I don't care what your end goal is, I would support you.

Okay.

If you were against the regime effectively,

You would be objectively revolutionary in my eyes.

I don't care what you're fighting for in the end.

We can disagree about that later, maybe.

Wait, hold up.

I am genuinely curious.

With that being said, however, have you encountered any anarchists?

No, they're not, because they are incapable, fundamentally, of being effective opponents of the regime.

Because to be an effective opponent of the regime, you have to create your own.

So you're not.

Let's be real, though.

You're not necessarily always going to agree with leftist people who have different ideologies.

No, no, no.

I never said that.

I said all effective opponents of the regime I agree with.

Okay, fair enough.

Effective means they are actually, in actuality, capable of standing up to the status quo.

Anarchists who don't believe in authority can't do that.

Square one they can't organize.

Square one, they can't build independent centers.

We don't have to do that.

Like, I am a scientific socialist, pan-Africanist.

Like, I.

I don't want to get off the ideology means is very little.

What I'm saying though is like when we we will mostly agree on anarchists and I don't I want to get on like what we where we disagree at.

Almost nothing.

Uh let me can I ask you a question though?

Do you f feel like America was a great leap for for humanity?

Uh okay, my view of history, I don't believe in a great leap.

I think that history proceeds by necessity.

That could be tragic, absolutely.

That could accompany a great deal of many evils and horrific things, sure.

The question at the end of the day is not: is this good or bad?

The question is, what choice do we have?

The question is what reflects an objective tendency within world history?

I mean, think about this.

Think about how we think about nature.

In nature, when there's a big catastrophe, nobody says.

uh was this great or not?

We say, Okay, how do we respond to it?

For some reason in history we have idealism that says there's no objectivity here, there's no materiality here.

It's all reducible to our individual choices.

So we true we attribute to it a moral criterion.

Now in America, if you can point to me the progressive forces that stood against the evils that corresponded to the founding of this country, point point me to them and I'll support them.

But genuinely look at the world when America came to be.

Who opposed who in opposition to the United States represented something morally superior?

For example, we had the British Empire.

Some leftists now want to make the argument the British Empire was morally superior.

I fundamentally disagree with that.

Why?

Because the British Empire

Was the reason for the bad inheritance we got in the first place?

All the evil and wickedness that is at the founding of the United States of America comes from Great Britain, the British Empire.

Dude, a new approach.

A new approach.

I'm fascinated for you to explain it.

What do you mean?

Bro, like I'm legitimately fascinated by what you're saying.

So ultimately what you're saying is like

America proceeding from

The great from Great Britain.

A lot of their morality came from Great Britain, so it was a yeah, of course.

Of course.

See, what I believe we cannot abandon as Americans, this is my modest view.

The notion and the purport of one united American republic.

And the tradition that that gave rise to corresponded, I will not disagree with you, all the evils and infamy.

I'm not going to deny any of that.

But I'm also going to say simultaneously there were also emancipatory and progressive threads that were there.

I agree.

All the evil was there.

I don't disagree with it.

But the notion of the- So as a Marxist, you're using you're using s sort of sock-dim language in some of this.

But like I said, there's a history of

America as a nation that is proletarian and that is bourgeois.

I mean, necess I mean, specifically for European settlers, yes, that is true.

Yeah.

Well

Yeah, of course.

The indigenous people were exterminated.

They were treated in a genocidal manner.

Um they were not included in the construction of the American nation, which I fundamentally think is a sin.

Of our nation.

But the notion of a united republic, one united American republic, on this land, on this continent.

is a wonderful place to start.

The simple purport that we have one indivisible republic.

For whom, though?

I am curious, though, like, for whom?

For whom?

For all the.

For the indigenous people, for the black people, for the white people, for the Latinos, for everyone who lives here, really.

Wait, wait, hold up.

So, we have to ignore, keep in mind, we have to ignore the history of the indigenous, ignore the history of the enslaved Africans.

Why ignore it?

Became emancipated.

I mean, specifically for your example, it was a great leap forward.

I don't think it was a great leap forward.

I think it was an objective development of world history that we have to respond to in some way.

I don't believe we can respond to it by balkanization.

Why should we not strive to build a single indivisible republic?

Uh yes, we can acknowledge the past for certain, but why should we not be one American nation or aspire toward one American nation?

I think it would be easier for me to like have this conversation with you.

We were just to like give a big day post that day that

like a national understanding of why you think that.

I mean, of course, not in the seventeenth cent 17th century or 18th century or the seventeen hundreds, not the nineteenth century pre uh

Or or or pre uh Jim Crow for it.

So I I would assume that you're primarily focusing the twentieth and twenty first century.

The future.

The future.

And what I'm merely saying is, there's something called history.

History is a development.

And we can trace in history threads of the development of a future that I believe in.

And I choose to believe, yes, America foundationally is evil.

I agree.

I'm not going to disagree with you.

But also, foundationally lies.

Uh something good.

I hear you.

I hear I I hear you and like

I'll be honest with you.

I I've heard a ton of rhetoric around you.

Um I I

In speaking to you, more empathy, especially when you say you're from Michigan.

But either way, I think that like that foundational idea that you believe America had a good path forward, disagree.

I think I disagree with most Marxists.

Don't think that the struggle.

By the way, I think.

Unless we could be time travelers, it wasn't a good path necessarily.

But the fundamental framework within which we can articulate

an emancipated and free American nation has to start from acknowledging thus far the experience of attempting to build a single republic on this land.

I'm not saying we blindly submit to that experience and say we're stuck within there.

I'm just saying the notion of building from scratch a state and a republic.

We will be burdened with that inheritance.

Dealing with many of the same issues, by the way,

that were dealt with.

And

The notion of one of of trying to have one American republic and one nation and one people that includes all the different groups, because look.

When European settlers came,

And when the institution of slavery

Continued to exist throughout the duration of the United States from its founding.

The European settlers who had come here had not yet fully committed to this land.

They had preserved an institution that was born from European colonialism, and they maintained the distinct and separate European identity that comes from Europe

Uh which did not reflect a full kind of um suspension and commitment to just being an American nation and all that may entail.

And I can trace uh a thread in the history of America of, in fact, the American national existence attempting to struggle to come to be

Uh at the expense of this

For example, in the civil rights movement, I don't romanticize MLK, and I don't romanticize the various kinds of naive liberal methods and approaches that correspond to that.

But that was genuinely a movement of Americans who said American national existence means we have to throw away the prejudices of the old world.

We came on different boats, but we're in the same land now.

We have to commit to America.

We have to commit to having a share.

Wait, wait, wait.

I got to pause you there.

I got to pause you there.

So I come from a Pan-Africanist lands.

Naturally, my mind goes immediately to Kwame Tarai during that time.

And I don't think that it was a.

It was a conscience lens from the American empire to integrate black people in this society.

It was closer to the Soviet Union.

And we had to look at it from an internationalist lens.

It wasn't an African Union.

It came from the American people and from support from the Soviet Union.

That's not true, man.

The Soviet Union specifically during the decolonization, this is in the height of decolonization of Africa.

And the Soviet Union specifically advertising or how would I say, using propaganda while African nations were decolonizing from their American bourgeoisie to integrate and so on because it was embarrassing for them internationally.

I fully understand.

But the only thing that explains to me is how it was able to be done peacefully because the bourgeoisie acquiesced to it.

But had they not done that, the conditions for a very revolutionary shift, really, actually was there anyway when you think about it.

The 70s, many people anticipated that America was on the cusp of a revolution, not just because of the rise of the black power movement, which was the most active and vigorous.

Element of that in America, but also because the American people after the counterculture and after Vietnam and so on and so on were just fed up with the system.

Just say it was the greatest leftist movement since the 1930s.

I have no no, no, no, it wasn't.

The Black Panthers were the greatest revolutionary movement in the entire 20th century that existed in America.

While I agree, it is very difficult for me as workers, because I'm a worker.

You're probably not a worker anymore.

It is hard for me to ignore what specifically people of European descent did in the 1930s for the 40-hour work week, the labor laws.

No, I agree.

But it wasn't revolutionary.

The notion of the revolutionary praxis and the construction of dual power and the adoption of Mao Zedong thought and asymmetrical organizational strategy only entered this nation through the Black Panthers.

I'm a fosterite.

I have William Z.

Foster on my wall, who is the leader of the American Communist Party back in the heyday.

So, of course, he was a revolutionary in a broader sense, and he was a good communist, and he was a good Marxist-Leninist.

However,

There's a reason that no Communist Party anywhere in any Western country was able to successfully establish a revolutionary strategy.

The Black Panthers got closer to that than anyone.

I want to say this, Haas.

I'm going to jump down because I'm sure there's other people that want to talk to you.

After speaking to you,

think you get a a a much more bad rap than you deserve.

Um like we we can disagree on a a ton of different things in the same way I disagree with like left Trotskyites and and and the whole nine.

Still think that you're a a net positive for the net movement or for the left wing movement.

Well, I appreciate you.

I want to say that to you, man.

I appreciate you.

Thank you.

I appreciate that.

I always appreciate people who want to figure out things for themselves and not just listen to what others have to say.

Uh okay, this will be the last guy.

Go ahead.

He's got a crazy name.

Yo, what's your guys's uh like end goal?

Ah, fulfilling the will of heaven.

Uh I mean, is that revolution?

Uh we don't have to make revolution a goal because revolution is a law.

Yes, I understand.

It's yes, it's inevitable.

I understand that.

But what are you doing in order to actually make sure that the working class has the consciousness that they need in order to reflect and respond?

To the moment we're living in.

What?

Our goal is to build a completely new state, a completely new authority and a completely new power.

I understand.

That happens after the revolution.

I'm saying what are you now happens now, not after.

Okay, okay, okay, fine.

You can't do that without revolution.

The point is, is that how are you going to make the working class not just do a trade unionist style sort of reform or referendum?

And how are you actually going to build that vanguard party?

Nobody does.

But I guess that, again, how do you build that organization if you don't actually mobilize the working class?

You're getting backwards, okay?

On the green, one if the mic is still good.

Wonderful good.

One's if we're good.

Two's if we're good.

Right.

Uh first of all, we are doing that, but before you can do that, you have to actually organize as cadre.

You have to organize as a militant cadre devoted to the cause, devoted to the vision, so to speak.

And then you have an operational capacity as a collective to actually agree on doing things such as organizing workers, which we do, by the way.

So, is that what happened in the October Revolution?

Like, you think that it started with the militarism part first and then it wasn't really?

So, then, how was it a nearly bloodless revolution?

That's an incredible description for an event that corresponded to years of one of the most bloodiest civil wars that have ever happened on earth.

The revolution itself, I'm saying.

Okay, the revolution is inseparable from the consequences that immediately followed it and did not consolidate it until the victory of the civil after the civil war.

But in any case, to respond to your question, there would have been no October Revolution if there was not decades of painstaking militant organization by the Bolshevik Party.

That's what was decisive.

They were prepared.

When ship popped off, they were ready.

Yeah, but the point is that nothing popped off, right?

It was that the working pop-up.

Absolutely popped off.

What are you doing?

Who died?

One person died.

It doesn't.

What shit popped off?

Okay.

You're talking about this specific moment in which the Petrograd Soviet and the Soviets seized power from the provisional government.

Correct?

Correct.

Yeah, that was relatively bloodless.

Okay.

To say that this was the revolution proper and not the years of civil war that were the prerequisite conditions of it actually being able to consolidate, the revolution did not consolidate until the end of the civil war.

So you're saying the revolution was bloodless.

No, it wasn't.

The revolution didn't end until after the civil war.

Wait, he just he just he just left.

He just go ahead, Juice.

How are you doing?

How are you doing?

Good.

Good.

I just have a question.

Sadly, you know, I got and I also am a new watcher to you, man.

I'm new to politics.

So I don't know too much about really anything.

Actually, I was in your kick and I asked you, you know, if we could just talk about theory, I want to know more about like information, like, so I could I don't know.

But basically, sadly, I got into a you know, argument with my mother.

You know, she told me.

You know, we talk about politics and she told me the only way to, you know, like be better, like, for us to be to live better is to vote.

And I disagreed.

And I wanna know what's actually a good response to someone who says we must vote.

And I kinda heard you talking a a little bit about it with

I think that's a good idea.

You know, I don't like Emma Goldman, but if voting mattered, they make it illegal.

That would that's what I would say.

I'd say that the all the people in power, you think they're gonna let a vote change the outcome?

You think they're gonna and you know what?

That's what I'd say.

I actually I absolutely agree with you.

I feel like But I would say fundamentally, Juice, as much as I love this conversation, we gotta wrap it up.

Don't argue about your mom.

Don't argue politics with your mom.

Please just stop doing that.

Never do that again.

That's the takeaway.

All right, guys, we're wrapping up the TikTok.

I'll see you guys later.

Alright, I need those someone like in infrared, just like help with the fucking making the TikTok banners or some shit that I need, supposedly.

So hungry.

Alright guys, we're wrapping it up right now.

Bye-bye.

Hope you had fun.

But it's over now.

Uh bye bye guys.

I'll see you Tuesday.

Goodbye.